Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout10212020 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 21, 2020 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with this order, the public may view/listen to the meeting online at https://temeculaca.gov/tv and not in person at City Hall. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Principal Management Analyst at lynn .lehner@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted . Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings . CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Turley-Trejo FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Youmans ROLL CALL: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Planning Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda October 21, 2020 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action . 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of October 7, 2020Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before or during a public hearing in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) in the manner prescribed in the important notice at the top of the agenda. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within fifteen (15) calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 2.Planning Application No. PA20-0930, the first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0930, THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA15-1885) FOR AN INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING, AND MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY LOCATED AT 31625 RANCHO VISTA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Exemption Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda October 21, 2020 3.Planning Application No. PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, and two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0567, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37925) FOR THE CREATION OF 13 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, TWO NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS (ONE OPEN SPACE LOT, AND ONE LOT THAT WILL BE USED AS A WATER QUALITY BASIN) ON 8.12 ACRES FOR PLANNING AREA 10 OF RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 4.Planning Application No. PA20-0568, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 3 non-residential lots (2 open space lots, and a water quality basin) on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, Scott Cooper Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: 5.Planning Application No. PA20-0569, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots (one of which will include a water quality basin) on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- Recommendation: Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda October 21, 2020 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0569, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37928) FOR THE CREATION OF 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND TWO NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS (ONE OPEN SPACE LOT AND ONE LOT THAT WILL BE USED AS A WATER QUALITY BASIN) ON 11.60 ACRES FOR PLANNING AREA 33A OF RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, November 4, 2020, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Due to the closure of City Hall, the library and other city facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the full agenda packet (Including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), will only be available for viewing on the City’s website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx at least 72 hours prior to meeting. If you have questions regarding an item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. Page 4 Item No. 1 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 7, 2020 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting was being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with this order, the public may view/listen to the meeting online at https://temeculaca.gov/tv and not in person at City Hall. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Principal Management Analyst at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings. CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Turley-Trejo FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Guerriero ROLL CALL: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans PUBLIC COMMENT The following individuals submitted an electronic comment on agendized item. • Adriana Mejia (2) • Leo McGuire (2) • Janet Bird (2) • Lidia Ridder (2) • Kyle Ager (2) • Diego Mejia (2) • Ronald Bauer (2) One public comment was received and signed by the following businesses: • Nice and Easy Smog (2) • Airstream Temecula (2) • One Stop (2) • A2 Auto Temecula (2) • Advanced Automotive (2) • Integrity Auto (2) • All Valley Auto (2) • Rancho Tooling (2) • Precision Alignment (2) • Speed Car Sales (2) • L & M (2) • Consult A Tech (2) • Bird Family Tire and Auto (2) • RV Supercenter (2) 2 • Autopro (2) • Eco Farms (2) • Discrete Sounds Studios (2) • Top Notch Auto (2) • Millennium Motorsports (2) CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of September 16, 2020 Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Watts, Second by Guerriero. The vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING 2. Planning Application Number PA20-0345, a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi-family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck-under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas Street, Brandon Rabidou Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-30 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0345, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 77-UNIT AFFORDABLE MULTI-FAMILY HOUSING COMMUNITY CONSISTING OF TWO RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS, A COMMUNITY BUILDING AND TUCK-UNDER PARKING LOCATED AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN'S 931-050-016 & 921-050-020) Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Guerriero, Second by Telesio. The vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT 3 ADJOURNMENT At 7:38 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, October 21, 2020, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Item No. 2 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2020 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-0930, the first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Exempt Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Generations LLC General Plan Designation: Public Institutional (PI) Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay (PDO-7) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On September 5, 2017 the City of Temecula City Council approved a Development Plan (PA15- 1885) for an approximately 493,044 square-foot independent living, assisted living, and memory care community containing 317 units generally located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road. The application proposed the development and operation of a congregate care facility consisting of ten structures collectively known as the Generations @ Linfield Village project. On January 11, 2018, the City of Temecula Community Development Department approved a Modification for the Generations @ Linfield Village project to modify a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) by adding a construction phasing plan, removing the first floor parking garage on Building B which reduces the height of Building B from 60'-0" to 48'-6", removing the flat roof area over the pool of Building A, replacing the exterior windows of the pool area of Building A with decorative wrought iron, removing 3,400 square feet of the basement area of Building A, and grading and landscape modifications. 2 On August 4, 2020, Generations LLC submitted Planning Application PA20-0930, the first Extension of Time for the Generations @ Linfield project. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Notice of Intent The applicant has applied for the first of five (5) extensions of time that are available per the conditions of approval. A Notice of Intent was mailed to all property owners within a 600-foot radius of the project site and two (2) signs were posted on the project site for ten days prior to the pending approval date. During the ten day period staff received two emails from the public requesting a public hearing for the project stating that they had concerns regarding the development of the project including dirt and dust from the construction of the project and traffic along Rancho Vista Road. With regards to traffic, Rancho Vista Road will be widened in front of the proposed project with dedicated turn lanes added for left hand turns onto Via El Greco and right hand turns into the project traveling east on Rancho Vista Road and a dedicated left hand turn lane into the project traveling west of Rancho Vista Road. In addition, a new crosswalk and notification signage will be added at Via El Greco. Concerns with construction dirt and dust will be controlled through dust control mitigation and City inspections during the construction of the project. After contacting the concerned parties by email and/or phone the request for a public hearing was reiterated to staff and a public hearing was scheduled for the project. Original Analysis of the Project from PA15-1885 Site Plan The project is located in Planning Area 3A of the Linfield Christian School Planned Development Overlay (PDO-7), generally located on the south side of Rancho Vista Road, approximately 2,500 feet east of Margarita Road on an undeveloped lot. The project is for the construction of an approximately 493,044 square-foot independent living, assisted living, and memory care community containing 317 units. The project is broken up into three buildings or building types: Building A is the main building of the community and is approximately 356,352 square feet, including a parking garage, located along Rancho Vista Road. The building varies in number of stories from two and three stories, over a parking garage, along Rancho Vista Road to four stories over a partial parking garage in the middle and the south side of the building adjacent to the Linfield Christian School. Within Building A are 226 independent living, assisted living, and memory care units along with an approximately 9,319 square foot theater for theatrical performances, a vitality center that includes an indoor swimming pool and spa along with exercise and aerobics rooms, offices, salon, credit union, chapels, library, theater, activity and lounge areas, kitchen and dining facilities, wine cellar, and a billiards room. Building B is an approximately 89,652 square foot four story building, including a parking garage, located on the southwest portion of the project that has 59 independent living units along with lobbies on each of the four floors. 3 The C Buildings are eight individual buildings that each contain four units that range in size from approximately 1,120 square feet to 1,170 square feet per unit. Each unit has its own private entry, kitchen, living area, bedroom, and garage and functions as a condominium unit. In addition to the indoor amenities offered, the project will also provide outdoor amenities including individual private open space (balconies or patios) for all the non-memory care residential units, an 18-hole putting green golf course, raised gardens, walking paths with a pond, a rose garden, four different courtyards including a secure courtyard for the memory care residents, fountains, and open space. The vehicular access to the project is from two driveways on Rancho Vista Road. The western driveway is the main access point to the community with a greeter booth and gates. The eastern driveway would function as the secondary access to the community as well as the primary entrance for the memory care portion of the community. In addition, there is fire access only via gates and a knox rapid entry system in case of emergency located at the rear of the site, that will not be accessible by the residents of the community or the surrounding neighborhood. On weekdays from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., the western driveway, or main entrance, outbound gate will be closed and traffic will be directed to the eastern driveway in order to mitigate the forecasted significant outbound left turn delay from the site during those hours. It will also help with morning traffic leaving the residential neighborhood to the north by not causing an additional turn delay. The project will be widening Rancho Vista Road along the project frontage from two lanes to four lanes along with adding in dedicated left turn lanes at the Via Del Greco intersection, one westbound into the project and one east bound onto Via Del Greco. In addition, a dedicated right-hand eastbound turn lane and a dedicated left-hand west bound turn lane will be added to the eastern driveway intersection. The project is required to provide 193 parking spaces for the congregate care use per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The project proposes 265 parking spaces. Architecture The project incorporates several architectural elements within the Spanish Revival design style throughout the community including dark exposed wood rafter tails, white stucco, courtyards and plazas, terracotta s-tile roof throughout, decorative wrought iron, decorative tile at building openings and arch ways along with decorative tile stucco niches, and curves and arches for windows and doorways. The project is also incorporating a divided light element on the majority of the windows. Landscaping The project, when completed, would provide 34% landscaping which exceeds the minimum 25% landscape requirement of the development code. Plant types include crape myrtle, California sycamore and live oak, western redbud, Australian willow, chitalpa, rosemary, lilac, red hot poker, and white sage. 4 LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on October 8, 2020 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Planned Development Overlay Amendment and Development Plan were approved in 2017. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and adopted on September 5, 2017 by the City Council as Resolution No. 17-64. The project applicant is seeking an extension of time for the previously approved development plan. The applicant is not proposing any revisions to the project approvals. Staff has reviewed the MND and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous MND was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the MND; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the MND; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project meets all requirements and mitigation contained in MND. FINDINGS Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; 5 The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Exemption 6. Notice of Public Hearing PA SE O G OLETA RANCHO VISTA RDC O R T E C A M A R IL L OCORTE ALHAM BRACORTE MALLORCA CORTE PACHECOP A U B A R DVIAELGRECOCORTE MADERAProject Site City of Temecula PA15-1885 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System .The m ap is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor'sDepartment and the Transportation and Land Managem ent Agency of RiversideCounty. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for theinformation contained on this map. Data and information represented on this mapare subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System andother sources should be queried for the most current information.This map is not for reprint or resale. 0 1,000500Feet N CXISTI NG [AS [IJ.[NT S: 0 ~~M~A;\M~~R 1~u~~ygRUT~~n~~u~~~~~o~~l~~~~i2~0\\~~ AS INSTRUV[NT NO. 615]0 or OFTICIAL R[COROS. 0 ~civ~~\M~~ 1~u~rc°RuT~~n~~U~~~~D~1~~~~~B~~IS1~Nl97J AS INSTRUM[NT NO. 1 ,4]52] or OFTICIAL RECORDS. 0 ;~R~~~~g~A~Eo 0~~ ;gR 0:~~~~~E R~~/A~G~G~T u~~~fy A AND 1NCIOENTAL PURPOSES R(CORO(D r[BRUARY 23, 1989 AS INSTRUM£NT NOS. 56265. 56266 A.NO 56267, ALL or OfflCAL RECORDS. -· 1 ··~ ' OPEN -~ SPACE BLDGA3 INDEPENDENT LIVING 4STORIES OVER PARTIAL PARKING GARAGE PATIO INING SEEA-A3.0 FOR PARKING - INFO TH£ PROJECT SITE IS LOCATED IN AN AREA THAT HAS THE POTENTIAL FOR BURROWING OWL HABITAI. THE PROJECT Will BE CONDITIONED FOR A PRE-CONSTRUCTION SURVCV IN ORDER TO OCT[R.\.IINE THE PRESENCE OR ABSENCE or BURROWING OWLS. 2 All GROUND MOUNTED OR ROOnOP EOUIPM[NT SHALL 8£ SCREENED FROM VIEW. J. ALL SITE PATHWAYS & SIOEWALl<S ARE TO BE ADA ACCESSIBLE 4. ALL ORiVE AISLE CONNECTIONS to TRASH [NCLOSURES 10 BE 2" II.AX. SLOP[ EA SEMENT NOTE: THIS OCVELOPMENT PROPOSES TO RECORD A RECIPROCAL DRAINAGE AGREEMENT WITH UNFl[LO SCHOOL FOR CROSS LOT DRAINAGE ANO THE USE or OF"FSITE DRAINAGE FACILITIES fOR DETENTION PURPOSES. I 1:1 Ii I BLDGA5 I ASSISTED LIVING I 4 STORIES PROJECT INFO PARCEL NO: LEGAL OESCRIPTION: ZONING: GENERAL PLAN: EXISTING USE: PROPOS(O USE: CONSTRUCTION lYPE: OCCUPANCY: SIT[ AREA: BUILO!NG AREA: BLOG Al BLDG A2 BLOG A] BLOG A~ BLDG A5 BLOG A6 BLDG 8 BLOG C ACCESSORY APN 955-020-018 PARCEL ·c· or LlA NO. PA-02-0245 P00-7 PI.ANNEO DMLOPMENT OVERI.AY PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL {Pl) VACANT SENI0R HOUSING: INDEPENDENT LIVING ASSISTED LIVINC MEMORY CARE VA-SPRINKLERED ANO Al/lRMED R-2, R-2.1, 5-2. A 15.58 ACRES "' 678,665 sr CROSS 14.55 ACRES "' 633.798 sr NET Off!CE/VITALITY TMEATER IND. LIVING/CORE INO. LIV(NC ASStSTEO/IND. LMNG VEIIORY CARE IND. LIVING V,LLAS GREETER BOOTH 15,J76Sf 9.319 sr 1s2,594 sr 61,099 Sf 93,676Sf 24,288 sr 89,652 sr 46,900 sr 140 Sf TOTAL r1.00R AREA RATIO: LOT COVERAGE (OF Nfl ACREAGE): TOTAL NATURAL OPEN SPACE TOTAL BUILDING FOOTPRINT PARKINC/ROAOS S!OEWALK5/PATHS LANDSCAPING BIOSWAL[/WO\.IP 0.72 BASED ON GROSS ACRES 0.77 BASED ON NET ACRES 10J,929 sr 68,349 Sf TOTAL HAROSCAP[ 195.JOOSr 1J.068 sr 493.044 SF" 86.296 Sf(HX:) 166.856 Sf(2SX) 112,210 sr(21~J TOIAL LANOSCAPE TOTAL NET SfTE A.~(A BUILDING HEIGH"IS: BLOG Al 2 STORl(S BLOG A2 1 STORY BLOC A] 4 STORl[S OVER GARAGE BLOG A-4 3 STORIES OVER GARAGE BLOG AS 4 STORIES OVER PART. GARAGE BLOG A6 2 STORIES BLOG 8 4 STORIES OVER GARAGE BLOG C l STORY CRECTER BOOTH 1 STORY GAZEBO 1 S'IORY TRASH ENCLOSURE l STORY PARKING RATIOS: ~ (\\4 IL UNITS, 72 AL UNITS) COVERED UNCOVERED llll!L01"li...J (59 IL UNITS) COVERED UNCOVERED llllli.llllil,_ (32 tl VILLAS) covraro UNCOVERED TOTAL PARKING ACCESSIBLE MOTORCYCLE (BLDC A} BICYCLE (BLOC A&B) UNIT COUNT: INPE PfNDENJ l lY NG STUDIO A-GUEST SlUDIO B-CUEST !~~u,:''~.' UNIT 18 UNIT 1C UNIT 1D UNIT 2A UNIT 28 UN!T 2C UN!l 2D UNIT 2E UNIT 2f UNIT 2C UNIT 2H GU(ST VILLAS 208.368 sr(]4x:) 6J].798 SF(l00") 35'-9_ 30•-o· 62'-6_ 52'-6" 62'-6" 30'-9" 61'-J" 2]"-]" 10"-a· 15·-o· 9·-0· SUBTOTAL IL ~ STUDIO A STUDIO 8 STUO!O C UNIT 1A (180) UNIT 16 (180) SUBTOTAL AL .!illlllfil'... FRIENDSHIP UNIT PRIVAIE UNIT SUBTOTAL MC TOTAL SENIOR LIVING UNllS = = 93 too J7 •o JO JB " ,. " J2 2J "' 265 " " = 1'AllilS JIT! 550 " 525 6 m ~ 722 .. 775 930 ~ ,0 1.\50 J 1.140 " 1.146 i • 1,210 J 1,480 f'.! 2 1.245 \,]20 ~ 1,555 0 950 ~ J90 1,140 J2 20J = JIT! J90 46 500 " <J5 2 722 775 72 = JIT! JB O 20 255 22 PRNATE OPEN SPACE: INPEPfNPEW I MNG PRIVATE PATIOS, BALCONIES, DECKS 2],92] sr SHARED PATIOS, BALCONIES, DECKS 4,779 Sf FOUNTAIN COURTYARD 2,730 Sf GAZEBO COURTYARD 6,506 Sf PLAZA 11.890 Sf TOTAL OUTDOOR SPACE 49.828 Sf (NOT INCLUDING GARDENS. PUTTING. ETC) NUMBER or INDPENDENT LMNG UNITS /20] OUTDOOR SPACE PER UNIT PROVIDED 245 Sf" ~ PRIVATE PATIOS, BALCONIES, DECKS ASSIST[O LMNC COURTYARD & PATIO ., TOTAL OUTDOOR SPACC NUMBER or ASSIST(O LMNC UNITS OUTOOOR SPACE PER UNIT PROVIDED 9,871 SF 6,35JSf 16,224 SF /72 225St ~- 4,700 sr SHAREO COURTYARD (1.424 sr COVERED) /42 UNITS " 112 sr PER UNIT • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Devel opment Co nrtru ction Managc mcn1 8601 SE Causey Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 Tel: (503) 652-0750 Fu: (503) 786-6451 www .gcncn.tion11lc.com >- I- z w::J 0~ <(~ ....J Q 0 < ....Ju QN a,:~(l) <(N- 1-0..0 > w V) ' -<(O t,1- >u~ 0 -J, I<( II) Ozv, U-'o.. z::) .. <uz ....J _ a,: w a. W> II)~< NW '° I- <') LI.. ....J z -~ ....J o z w V) ISSUED fOR: ~~ DEVELOPMENT PLAN -- 05.]0.17 ----- ----- KEY PLAN SITE PLAN APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885 I G A ZEBO ELEVA TIO N SCALE. 1/4"=1'-0" ''</\S·· & '<cC"C.C C··~ '· s rlL •,~ /G TYPICAL BUILDING TRASH/ RECYCLING ALCOVE fs\ SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 1'-.,__~ / -C? //- 80 -0 ~]111111111111111111111111111111111111111( TYPICAL GATE DETAIL SCALE· 1/4""'1'-0" :~ ' I .. At~ --------,,/-L-- ~ Linfield \ILllage 0 G 0 u I'f PICAL MONU_M~NT SIGN~~ SCALE 1/4"•1'-0" ~-/ GREETING BOOTH SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE· 1/4"=1"·0" TYPICAL TRASH/RECYCLE ENCLOSURE GATE f~\ SCALE, 1/4"•1'-0" ~'_) 0 -~-~- 0 0 G 0 0 /G G GREETING BOOTH WEST ELEVATION (EAST _§_I_M) SCALE· 1/4"=1'-0" / ', ~- - // -G -=:c ;c /-G) - -~----- __/ // CD > °"" ~ --: [__ __] TYPICAL TRASH/RECYCLE ENCLOSURE SIDE r.~ SCALE,- 1/4';;;-;::;,;-- -- \!__) GREETING BOOTH NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4ff=1'-0" TYPICAL TRASH/RECYCLE ENCLOSURE DOOR fa\ SCALE· 1/4"=1'-0" \_:_,/ VICINITY MAP FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS & SPACING SCALE· 1"=100'-0'' 5~€ [', A~C~::: GA-~ &- VO,-.,V:'> s c-, c~Aw,cs 9.'0/A· .? PROJECT \ -Af ' /'. \ ,... ·- • ✓- FINISH NOTES 0 ;:_,,55 " ., C· f~MI,~, cc,C4•. !, s . ; s r AC.· ~00' ,c, · AC t ", C0.0"1 J6":: w,,,· ... + J "•s!'<<ICQ"A 0 ,·-::;Qr,_,., ca cs .c J ;;;.,1 sv ccc 2C/JC5A'\J•.OA ••,·5. 0) , ·, ::;411 " co C'<'.J J cw~- s-occc w; "<0v:.A s os cccv-s 2CIJC SA'-J · .011.· '.S· 8 ;•,~:J.,G··· 40, ~A \.G ACC'\.- Go? ·S •·\.C\.G. ce-. co 0'-1 g AC-< .:cwJ:q CCII" .- , S·- 8 ~0,.,C· SIii'/\. "SA·1'•? .AS. ,AV· ·ASCA -os- & ·-1• s s·11 v :i o)(:o;;iJ g;;iow, © V\.'' V.\.)OWS W/C.•.A"S::; Al\.G ·v.::.cA •; GA'!) s-v \.f S•:;>tS cx:--10:;, lHO\.I' '\.S•· (D -- a= ;;i::; ASS c.F) w xoows 11,J socss v./c_u,-. c...At ,c ~ C.:OVVO\. r,'!'f,S V CA'-!,)_ WCC)C A) S:~·S r X1i.'lC4 3'10\./C ''- S- ® "'"<•C11S· W\.JCW S S. Sv'NCv-.OS & ~ASC "Ar-..c S CO oe $1\\JR•" ®J:CO"(A.V' G··· ,x· .. ,1.- @ 5·c. "-!AS- JOO R cc 04 0X'0'C •How, o cv, wr, s & CO ... V\ W/S"..JCCO ·,s-- (3 .>RU'.:AS" CO . .,V\ C11.:> CO 0'< SA\.J;;i- G sc,11::;t/ .· ~;,/\.(.; ,a,· .i::: ,.,"<J,-:. 5c;,r.;;i,,, ::>:-IV 8 CC'-1-!._::;,,-,~ V•"A 'ICC' W/V·"h_ A\.C.' :;>v CO.C-l ~X·O'!~ :f'IGV,\. G 7t CA covc..ccs » oc s·,·.1 ccvv'•?cr. c..,· .:;,~ 1'.1 ( - svoo·- so,.,A'I· ;,;;io, , Jow,s.:>o" ·s · flC-04'" ,("\,A-< ', S Vll\.5/\40 dRCW\. s; :. t. ,.A'IG< o c;;i,_ t - ,:: 3o~r .• H,w.,c 'J,.V•/A·,7 ffi_ • GENERATIONS FAJ'vllLY OF COMPANIES l)cwlopmeot Connruction ~3na~mc11l 8{,01 SE C3uscy Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 ra.. (503) 652 0750 F:u : (503) 786 6451 www.gcncratiomlk.com >- I- z w::J 0~ <(~ _Jo _Ju > w (91- 0 z(/) _J _ W> z w (/) SSv:,; ·C~ J"VL.0''V'"" •1.A\ - - ----- SITE DETAILS "' = < / < > A.::,\ #9!:J":) C2C- c· 8 "7 •.5 1 .J "1:2; ·16 ·,2 .)' '-prl1 ·o " ut'~rl~S~ ~------ Statistics Description Bu1ldmg 'B' Parking Lot Dnve Aisle 'A' & Building 'A' Lot Symbol Avg Max Min Max/Min Avg/Min + 2.4 fc 6.5 fc 1.1 fc + 1.6 fc 4.4 fc 1.0 fc 4.4:1 1.6:1 Drive Aisle 'B' + 2.0 fc 2.9 fc 1.0 fc 2.9:l 2.0:l Drive Aisle 'C' + 1.8 fc 4.8 fc 1.0 fc 4.8:l l.8:1 Drive Aisle 'D' + 6.9 fc 7.5 fc 5.7 fc 1.3:l 1.2:1 Drop-off + 2.4 fc 5.1 fc 1.1 fc 4.6:l 2.2:l Unfield Way --flllDDll!llllllDIIDDI .. --- .... • GENERATIONS FAM ILY OF COM PANIES Dcvcloprrn,:nl Coniuuclion .\13n3gcmcrn '? A T4 • B_T3 1 B_T5M ! • ... A2_T4 A T3 B_TSW C_T4 O_T3 D_T4 ' W"!R\01W.fUSl• ~Sll[Ml!DIU!<lfOUJl>!JHAll>.ft4)j »-j llG,<T11,0l!$Wrt11M,LLCOOl'T1::S 't>l'f j .. ,.. ..... ".-~ I I - J u -1 -,-Y4~+.,,=-+''"~·~·"'-"'~-1 )0 iA\'>l·™·llt>·[·t.l·SU -~~~l,_1~~·=~;~~~ !YI/Sl'lllUGl'tlCOHlllOI,. la"·~ .. ,. .... i ll1C QJ.MICJ-L MtO!VM NCOIU.IIV! .ro lt"'IIU.!ll !•)UG,ril~ WnH A«bUDO'TICS•TVPfl.utfl z• j l-"'- 10 JU·ftl·l.t061•<1-000 Vl,','•l••OJM!O·O< "--+,~-.=.,,~- .. =M~,~-~-· -j:~:i❖?\~t(l~l:;~r~u ! ,i ' I 8601 SE C3u'<:}' Avenue I l'onland, OR 97086 Tel.: (SOJ) 652 0750 F.....-: (503) 786 6451 www.generation~lk.o::om >- I- z w:::) 0~ <(~ _Jo 0 <I'. QN _Ju O:'. 8, (X) 4'.N~ 1--0-0 > w ~,ci:6 >utJ 01- 0 -Ji I<l'.lll Oz(/) U..Jo- z::J .. ,ci:UZ _J _ O:'.LJ.Ja.. ll)~<I'. W> NLJ.J -0 1-- ;;; LL...J z -~ _Jo z w C/) ~-M~~ "l~·, - ~=--:_____ '.}'-.':'.'_:.:..£°~'::__ r:,A, o~ . .!:;,, SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC / < PLA"-"'ING DEPARTMENT SCA f CONOITI ONALL Y '~PPROVEE),:a SUa.JECTTOTME~n~~J;ONOl20FAPPIIOVAL.AS APl't!OVl:0 KIO,~Nf:t'(QU~TY Al'PIIIOVAL - - c;,si~o~~QAW~evn l [ IT Of MECULA _ 0 .,, S IT E S E C T IO N SCALE· 1 "=20'~0" DJ RA:,.,:c110 VISTA RLMD MEMORY CARE ASSISTED LIVJNG SITE SECTION SCALE 1"=20'-0" ASSISTED LIVING BUILDING A CORE SITE SECTION SCAL E 1"=20'-0" RA\"CI 10 VISTA ROAD INDEPENDENT LJVJNG / ' RJ\ "\Cl io \'ISTJ\ ROAD 31411 Corte Madera f A I ~'_,) 31433 Corte Madera SITE SECTION SCALE: 1"=20'-0" 31367 Corte Camarillo ~"~.- :· ,J!'J/, . .... {;~ ',~ - .. 'Ii> •. -. RA'.\:CI 10 \'IST;\ l{Oi\D SITE SECTION - --- SCALE: 1"=20 '-0" --0 • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Dcvdopmcm Construction Management 860 1 SE Cauocy Avenue J Portland, OR 9708 (, Tel.: (503) 652 0750 Fax: (503) 786 6451 \\Ww.gcncrntionsllc.com >- I- z w::J 0~ <(~ _Jo 0 <{ QN _Ju Ck'. s; co <{N- ,-0>0 > w (/) ' -4:0 (j1- >u~ 0 -Ji I <{ Lll Oz(/) u _J °' z:::i .. 4:UZ _J _ c.:wa.. W> Ll) ~ <{ NW --o>-- (') LL _J z -~ _Jo z w Cl) ss.a c 00:, R'"':f - ?!_,-_':.~ xvr c-v.v "'LA'- 0~ !C r-1-..., u ·· ,o·-o· SITE SECTIONS Al .4 "' = z < sj .o 0 A;i'I\ //9':n 020- 018 :>/1. j , 88:", DA RK EXPO SED W O O D r1'> \..._',/ - ELEMENTS OF SPANISH REVIVAL STYLE - EXAMPLES AND FEATURES AT LINFIELD VILLAGE, TEMECULA 14'\ TERRACOTA ROOF \.__) WHITE STUCCO (2) --~:J D VIGNETTE A MAIN ENTRY - INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING A SEE SHEET A-A5.1 ~ ?::~~-:-~~---- □ w . "'V=, I 1III 'L IJJJ VIGNETTE C MEMORY CARE EXTERIOR BUILDING A SEE SHEET A-A5.1 ~---- - -~---, 111111~w~111lm11~11m~m1~@· .... -=' ~ . ~ "" D II II II VIGNETTE F VILLAS BUILDING C SEE SHEET C-A3.1 VIGNETTE B FOUNTAIN PLAZA/CHAPEL EXTERIOR BUILDING A SEE SHEET A-A5.1 VIGNETTED GARAGE ENTRY/SOUTH WING - INDEPENDENT LIVING BUILDING A SEE SHEET A-A5.1 (5) DECORATIVE WROUGHT IRON @ BALCONIES AND PATIOS • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Dc,-elopmcnt Conn ruction Management 860 1 SE Causer Al-'cnuc I Ponbnd, OR 97086 Tel. (503) 652 0750 Fax: (503) 78<, M51 www.gcncratiomllc.com >- 1- z w::) 0~ <(~<( -'O -'u0 > z 0- 0zO -'--' W>- - ::) LL .....I C:0 z -~ -'O z w (/) DESIGN CONCEPTS SPANISH REVIVAL STYLE / < er :,, > o_ 0 VIGNETTE E INDEPENDENT LIVING ENTRANCE BUILDING B SEE SHEET B-A5.1 4 9 4 '-7" MEMORY CAR[ ©- I 11 11 11 II II -© VILLAGE PLAZA ",/!II/!' ~- LJ .. , VITALITY CENTER y-° L_"",a·-o·· l]o. ~ TYP " ;!, ~ -, .. - !" i'======"-',>aa====11 -~,-- -~, - VILLAGE SQUARE ABOVE ©- ©- ©- ©- I I L_l I I I I I I I I I I I L-, I I I - _ __r- - - - - - - - L _ - - -- - -- __ J ©- ~ ~ ~ ,,..... ,, .... --7 ~----L , r---------7 r----7 L .J L .J L .J I I I I I ,, I MEMORY CARE 1 ABOVE I I I I I I r---------------7 L-, I I I J I I I I I I r" r I I I I L----------------~ I I I I L l ~ Ji : I I I I I L7 .~ I ASSISTED LIVING/I MEMORY CARE I LOBBY ABOVE ~ 7 I I I I r _J I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ,. . .,. .. .... LEVEL 00 - INFO BUILDING ARE.A: BLDG Al BLDG A2 BLDG AJ BLDG A4 BLDG A5 BLDG A6 TOTAL sr LEVEL 00 OCCUPAN CY: BLDG Al BLDG Al UNIT COUNT: orrIcE/VHAUTY lHEAT[R GARAGE/SERVICE IND. UViNG (ABOVE) GARAGE MEMORY CARE (ABOVE) BLDG A2 THEATER BLOG AJ GARAG[/SERV,CE BLDG A4 IND. UViNG (ABOVE) BLDG A5 GARAGE BLDG A6 MEMORY CARE (ABOVE) TOTAL OCCUPANTS LEV [l 00 NO UNITS ON LEV EL 00 OrFICE/LOBBY VITALITY CENT ER 15.J76SF 9,319 SF 41,044 SF 0 SC 10,9JOSF 0 SC 76,669 St - -0 ~=1=i=1=1=i=1=1=i=1=1=i= ~~-"" """." "" ... ~ J. I ·1~: ~j I / I I I . I . I . 58 --© ,., 250 "' 0 55 "' -© ' ~ -© 1 --© :~~ --© --© -© --© ~@ • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Development Connru cti on Manage ment 8601 SE Cau1cy Avenue I Ponland, OR 97086 Td. : (503) 652-0750 Fu: (503) 786-6451 www .gencratimullc.com >- I- z w:::, 0~ <( ~ <( 0 _Jo <( _Ju0 QN ~~OJ <(N~ 1-0,.0 > z V, ' -<(O 0- >u~ 0 ,Ji OzO I<( II) u...Jo,. z::J .. _J _ _J <uz ~UJEL W>- II)~<( NW - ::) ~I- f') LL ...J CO z - Q:'. _Jo z w (/) ISSUED FO R: ~D ATE: w "" OEV EL()~MENT ~-- 05.30.17 -.J. ----- I= ----- " <D ----- :, "' ----- ~ KEY PL.A N rS ~ "" EB 5 a. ' ,~ z PROJECT NORiH w ::, a. s BUILDING A ~ LEVEL 00 FLOOR PLAN '.' 1,1-..,.,.,...,..,,,.,...,,,..;;;;;;;'-""-==....,nl : '" ~ ~ z ii' a. APN:#955-020-01 B PA15-1BB5 I 8 • "'$0 .,:9.-:·-r I . MEIJORY ~R_!:_ GENERATIONS ~ ~ <f ~ ~ ~ ? 9 ~?..9 9 9 ? ? ? %? ~ %P ~ ~~ %P %P«%P ? ~ FAMILY OF COMPANIES q? Gf er ... __. ,, .... ,,·-•· ,,._,. ,. .... ,, .... ,.--r ...... ,,._,, . ,. ..•. .. .... .. ~ ,, ..... Development Connruction Management 8601 SE CaUKY Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 ® --© Tel: (503) 652-0750 Fax: (503) 786-6451 www .gcncrationsllc.com --© ©- ©- ~ ---© 5 ---© § ~ ---@ ·(l u u --© " " -© ~~di 0 -· ~-.JI II ® ~, -© _ _, >- D D D ~ ---1 I- ~~-1 -© z (0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ --© w ::::> LEVEL 01 - INFO .. ,.. BUILO:NG ARfA: 0~ --"'":' BLDG Al OFFICE/VITALITY o sr --© BLOG A2 THEATER 0 SF BLDG A] INDEPENDENT L!VING JJ,6J9SF <(~<( BLDG A4 INDEPENDENT UVING 1-',489SF BLOG AS ASSISTED LIVING 22,780 SF BLDG A6 M[IJORY CAR E 14,487 SF TOTAL SF LEVt.L 01 85.J95 SF _Jo 0 ~ ~ ~ OCCUPANCY: <{ BLDG Al OfFI C[/LOBBY _Ju0 ON ~ BLOG A1 VITALITY C[NT [R --© ll! 8; IX) D ~ D BLDG A2 THEATCR <{N~ BLOG AJ INO[P[NQ[NT LIVING '69 BLOG A4 INOEPCNOENT LIVING 72 ,-o-o > z VJ ' Ef'p - 'M BLOG A5 ASSISIEO LIVING -<{O BLOG "5 ASSISIEO UVlfl,G ,. >u~ BLOG A6 MEMORY CARE 72 \' (!)- TOTAL OCCUPAN TS LEVEL O 1 4'3 --© ·; 0 -J, UNll COUNT: OzO I<{ 1/J U--'o- ~ lf:lDE:PrnDE:til l~i!:l:C = !ID --© z::J .. STUD!O A - GUEST 550 ! _J _ _J <{uz stuoo 8 - GU[Sl 52S ll! w Q_ ~ OOi r,' "' --© 1/J ~ <{ 722 w - NW ~~ UNIT 18 775 - > ::::> -0 f-- .... ,oc ... UNll lC 930 ~ OOi UNll 10 1,150 ~v ;;:; UN!l 2A \,140 UNll 28 1,146 LL ....J CO UN!l 2C 1,290 UNfl 20 1,480 z UNll 2E 1,245 -0 UNll 2f" 1,320 © UNll 2G 1,555 -~ UNll 2H 950 SUBTOfAl IL _Jo ~ = !ID -+@ STUDIO A l90 " STUDIO B 500 0 STUDIO C "' 0 UNfl IA (180) 722 0 UNll 1B {18D) 775 2 z ~-- SUBTOTAL AL ----> ,. --© ~ = !ID w FRiENDSHIP UNIT l80 ,0 PRIVATE UNIT 225 SUBTOTAL '-'C (/) lOIAL UNITS LEVEL 01 " --© --© ISSUED FOR ~ OAT[· <O "" II OEVELOPIJ.ENT PLAN_ ~.J0.17 ~ II ----- I= II ----- ~ rel ----- 5l ----- ~ ~ KEY PLAN ~ ~ --© 5R"'~ er ) ! z --© EB :'i ffrlf-J a. \ ) ~ \ 7 ~ ~ -·-· L-- PROJECT NORTH " '----__/ a. g BUILDING A ~ LEVEL 01 0 -- ·-· -· ... --© FLOOR PLAN '.:: I - . - CITY OF T~~ECULA ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ i§ ~H~ Pl..A r.....l NG DE PARTM ENT SCALE J5 Ji ,r-r Ji it .. 4 Js ,.-.,r ~ •H cit"'~ ~ "~ c!i , ..... ~ ...... ~ ....... ~·~(? Ek ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~H4 l DA CONOITIONALL Y "' 0 " ~ 1 • PPRovee,,. w IWII.JECTTOT~~JA " ' NS~APPROVAJ..AS :;, APPROVE •- '" CITY PP!IOVAL 0 ~ g/S/Z017 DRA WING NUMBER z '" Q_ APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885 j @ • 494'-7" ' MOW RY .£~q1 GENERATIONS C? ~ <r c;p Cf <f c;p <f <f 9 9 9-~9 9 ? 9 9 9 %? ~ "f ,,·.,· %? ~ , •..•. %? %? %?,,%? ,, ... ? ~ FAMILY OF COMPANIES U:•( ,. ..... .... , .. ,,._.,. "~ ...... ,,._,. ,. ..... ,r-r '!'•!C Development Conmucrion Management 8601 SE Cuucy Avenue I Porthnd, OR 97086 Tel.: (503) 652-0750 Fax: (503) 786-6451 ~ www.gcncn.tion1llc.com ©- ©- -© -© ©- ,:t,1)~~ ©- -© ©- -- -© >- lJ Li lJ I- -© z ~ ] ·- LEVEL 02 - INFO -@ w :::> BUILDING AREA: 0~ 8LDGA 1 OFFICE/VITAUT'V 0 SF BLDG A2 THEATER OSF BLOG A3 INDEPENDENT LIVING 30,453SF <(~<( BLOG A4 INO[P[NQ[Nl LIVING 14,489Sf BLOG A5 ASS!STEO UI/ING 23,214 SF BLOG A6 M[l-'ORY CAR E 9,801 SF TO TAL SF LEV EL 02 77,957 SF -o 0 OCCUPANCY: < QN BLDG Al omc[/LOBBY _Ju0 ll!~CX) BLDG Al VITALITY CENTER BLDG A2 THEAl[R 4'.C'I- Efp BLDG AJ INO[P(ND[Nl UV!NG 152 1-0-0 > z V) ' BLDG M INO[PCNO[Nl LIVING 72 -4:0 BLDG A5 ASSISTED LMNG '" >utJ BLDG A6 ME~ORY CAR[ " '? 0- TOTAL OCCUPANTS LEVEL 02 "' ~ 0 .,;, UNIT COUNT: OzO I4'.Ltl U-' °' INIJLPEti DEtil I l~l!SQ = = z::J .. SlUDIO A - GUEST 550 5 _J_ _J 4:U Z STUDIO 8 - GUEST 525 ll!WC.. !'"" m lll~< UNrT IA 722 17 w - NW UNrT 18 775 0 _>:::, -0 I- UNrT IC 9JO 2 UNtT 10 1,150 0 ;;; UNlT 2A 1,140 2 UNrT 28 1,146 2 LL ....J a'.) UNrT 2C 1,290 0 UNIT 20 1,480 0 z UNIT 2[ 1,245 2 UNrT 2F 1,l20 0 UNIT 2G 1,555 -~ UNIT 2H 950 SUBTO TAl IL JO _Jo ~ = = --© STUDIO A J90 '5 STUDIO B 500 STU DIO C .,, U"lll 1A (1B0) "12 2 UNll 1B (180) 77 5 z SUBTOTAL AL ----> 27 -- ~ = = w FR ![NQSH!P UNIT J80 10 PRIVATE UNIT 225 SUBTOTAL MC 21 (/) TOTAL UNITS LE\IEL 02 78 ISSUED FOR ~ DATE: ~ .. O~ELOPMENT ~',I 05.J0.17 ~ < ----- I= ----- " "' ----- ~ ----- ~ KEY PLAN r5 ~.--, " :J . 1"--,__c EB z '.I ¼J rJ a. r \ 7 ~ /5 -·-·- L..-- PROJECT NORTH ::, a. '3 BUILDING A ~ LEVEL 02 0 © FLOOR PLAN '.:: . - ____gn' Of TEM~k'- ~ di .. , Ji ...... 4 ~ .. --r c!5 4 ·•·-r cit ,r-r 4 "~ 4 w-r ~ ...... ~ ,r.,.. ~·~b ~ ~ •o":f ~ i§ ~ ~ ~H~ ~ t 4 ik ~ €§'~4 Pl.A t\t,II NG DE PARTMENT SCA LE "' 140A: CONDITIONALLY 0 ~ PPRovee,,. ~ SU&JECff0f~G5A C NS~OVAI..AS APPROVE 'fllell,T, V -~ITY PROVAL 0 r g/S/2017 DRA WING NUMBER z ir a. I APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885 I 0 t "-$0 494'-7" ' 1,1(MORY C~~~- GENERATIONS )9 <y~ <r Gf ~ ~ ~ ~ Er '( ?-~? '( ? 9 ? 9 ? %9 ? 11·-•· Er ? ,,._,. ~ ·•·-•· ? <r .. <r E? ~ FAMILY OF COMPANIES ,, ..... •~-·-- ,, ..... ,,.,. ,r .. · ,, .... ,.. .... .~ .. - Dcvc:.lopmcnt Con1tn1ction Manage ment 8601 SE Cau1c:y Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 @ Tel.: (503) 652-0750 Fax: (503) 786-6451 ~ www.gcncration1llc.com ©- ©- ---© ---© ©- ©- ---© ©- ---© >- [J u D I- ---© --------------------------- z Roar ~ 4 ~ 4 4 6 ~ BELOW LEVEL 03 - INFO w::J ~ BUILDING AREA: 0~ BLDG A1 OfflCE/VITAUTY O SF BLDG A2 THEATER OSF SLOG AJ INDEPENDENT LiVING 30.865 Sf <(~<( BLOG A4 INDEPEN D[NI LIVING 14,489Sf BLOG A5 ASSISTED LIVING 21,110 Sf BLDG A6 J,IEMORY CARE 0 Sf TOTAL sr LEVEL OJ 66,4M Sf _Jo 0 < OCCUPANCY· _Ju0 QN BLOG Al OFFI CE/LOBBY ~~CX) BLOG Al VITALITY CENTER BLOG A2 THEAl[R <N- Erv BLOG AJ INDEP[N O[NT LIVING '" 1-<>-0 > z V) ' BLOG A4 lNO[P(NO[NT LIVING 72 -<O BLOG AS ASSISTED LIVING ,o, >u~ BLOG A6 MEMORY CAR[ 0 (9- TOTAL OCCUPAN TS LEVE L OJ JJ2 0 -J, UNIT COU~: OzO I<l!l U--'o- INQEPE~D:Et:il ll~1f:jQ = !ID z::::> .. STUDIO A - GUEST 550 5 _J _ _J <uz STUDIO 8 - GUEST 52S 0 ~wa.. r: m 0 l!)~< 722 ,. w - NW UNIT 18 775 0 _>:::, '° I- UNIT 1C 930 2 UNIT 1D 1.150 0 ;;:; UNIT 2A 1.140 2 """' UNIT 28 1.146 2 LL _J CO UNIT 2C 1.290 0 UNIT 20 1.480 z UNIT 2E 1.245 UNIT 2f 1,J20 UNO 2G 1,555 -~ UNll 2H 950 SUBTOTAL IL _Jo ~ = !ID STUDIO A 390 " STUDIO 8 500 1 STUDIO C m UNO \A (1B0) 775 0 UNIT 18 (18D) 760 ' z SUBTOTAL AL ----> " NOOI B(LOW TOTAL UNITS LCV(L OJ 60 w (/) ISSUED FOR ~ DAT[: "' a. DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05.J0.17 ~ - --- "' ----- I= ----- " <D ----- :, "' ----- ~ ~ "' EB z s 1:-- <L ~ PROJECT NORTH 3 ::, <L - '3 BUILDING A ~ LEVEL 03 0 FLOOR PLAN c:: __ QT!'._QF TEM~U~~- ci SCA LE "' di 4 ,r-r 4 4 , ...... 4 ·~-, .. ~ ....... 4 •~:!: 4> .. ~ 4i ,,4 ~ ....... it ....... ~•4b Ek b ~ ~ i1i i1i Ji'~~ 4 4 it 4 ik ~HEk PLA.tff NG DE PARTM ENT "' 14~ CONDITI ONALLY 0 ® PPRO'le B'" ~ lU8Jl!CTlOT':A.DfHG$A ~N5~0V~A5 0 APPROVE •- U Cl OVAL ~ g/S/2017 DRA WING NUMBER z °' <L APN,#955-020-018 PA15-18B5 I @ • 494'-7" ! t.'CMORY _f:AR[ GENERATIONS <\? <r ~ er Cf Cf %? Cf Cf ? ? ?H? ? ? ~ 9 ? %? cri cri %? ~~ %? %?---~ ? ~ FAMILY OF COMPANIES '(•( ,. .... , ... , .. ,. .... ,u ··~ ,. ..... ,. . ...,. ··~ H ,. ..•. .. .. ,. ,. .... ,.._,. Development Conmu ction Managemen1 8601 SE Causey Avenue I Ponland, OR 97086 ·p --------- Tel.: (503) 6S2-0750 I ---7 Fax: (503) 786-64S1 I I www.generatioruUc.com I I ©- r :' I © ---© ©- ' [ -~I ' @" ---© ©- ©--- r' ---© ©-- D ---© ------- I D >- LJ u [j I I I- I D ---© I I I D -------------------------- I z :d> ~ ~ cb ~ ~ cb 6 ~ ---· I w::, LEVEL 04 - INFO ~ BUILDING AREA: l')~ BLOG Al OfflCE/VITAUTY OSF SLOG A2 THEATCR OSF BLDG Al INDEPENDENT LIVING 33,704 SF <(~<( BLOG A4 INDEPCNOENT llVl"-G 521 SF aLDG AS IN0EPOI0[Nl LIVING 15,642SF BLDG 116 IAEMORY CARE 0 SF TOTAL sr LEVEL 04 49,867SF _Jo 0 OCCUPANCY: <( _Jul') QN BLDG Al OfflCE/LOBBY ~r:;<X) BLDG Al VITALITY CENTER BLDG A2 THEAT[R <(N~ Ef'p BLOG AJ INDEPENDtNT LIVING 169 1---0-0 > z V) ' BLOG A4 INDEPENDENT UV!NG 2 -<(O BLDG AS INDEPENDENT LIVING 79 > utJ BLOG A6 MEMORY CARE 0 l')- TOTAL OCCUPANTS LEVEL 0( 250 0 ,J, UNIT COUNT: 0z0 I <(II) U---'o- lt:H:!EPEt-.l tmtr I l~lt:,:I, -'1ZE Jill z=> .. SlUOIO A - GUEST ssc _J -ci::UZ STUDIO 8 - GUEST "' _J _ ~wa. r':.' 4JS II)~< m W>- UNll 18 775 NW UNIT \C 9J0 - ::) --0 I- UNIT 10 1,150 UNIT 2A 1,140 <') UNIT 28 \,146 LL -l c:tl l ~:~ :g 1,290 1,480 z UNIT 2E 1,245 UNIT 2r \,.}20 UNIT 2G 1,555 -~ UNll 2H 950 GUEST '90 _Jo TOTAL UNITS LEVE L O• " ~ z w (/) ISSUED FOR: REV: DATE: <D ----- "" l DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05.J0.17 ~ "' ----- ~ ----- ::, <D ----- vl ----- ~ KEY PLAN ~ ~;,,_::.::i © z s &J__J:\ a. ~ C 7c.::= PROJECT NORTH 1c, ~ BUILDING A ~ i;; LEVEL 04 0 FLOOR PLAN '.:: ,. .... ,. ..... ,r-,o• ,..__. >H "~ ,.._.,. .. ..... , •. __. .. -~Ofl~~U.!,,A ~ di it it ~ ~ ~ it ~ ~ ~ ~ ilt'tk 4 ~ •[·" ~ 6 ~ •~::t· ~ 4H~ ~ ~ Ek 4 ~ 4•·•4 PlA J'IIII ING DEPARTMENT SCALE 1 ~~ CONDITIONALLY "' 0 © PPRovee,,. w SUBJECTTOT~O'#lGIA ~_!il~~Al.AS ~ AP'PAO..-E 'Ael'. 1J Ct OVAL ~ g/S/2017 Olt~WING NUMBER z if APN,#955-020-018 PA15-18BSI @ t 494'-r i MEMORY CARE GENERATIONS 9 ~ ~ cri ~ "" er ~ er ~ ? ? 9H9 ? 9 ? 9 ? ? ~ %P %? ~ <r ~ <r -➔<v> ? ~ FA M IL Y O F C O M P A N IE S ...... , ..... ,. .... .. .... , ...... . ....... , ..... ....... , ..... ,,._, . , ..... ll':;t" ...... ,..... , ...... Development Connn.11:tion M m agc m cn1 8601 SE Cauacy Avenue j Portland, OR 97086 ] - _- ____ --_ r -- r----- ---© ra.. (503) 6S2-0750 ________ _J Fax: (503) 786-64S1 www .gcncra tiont ilc.com ©- --® l --© ©- --@w . ~ --© ~ ~ ©- r--------------- rj --@ I ,-----,,----- ©- --@ I II --© ©- D -@ I D >- D D D ROO" [)[LOW I I I- I D --© I I I D I z :~ <bi cb ~ cb <bi (, I w ::::, ~=-1 --@ I I (j~ ROOF I GARDEN I --© B E .O W <C ~<( .....1 0 0 <( ROOf .....lu(j QN BELOW --© ~s,CX) <(N~ Ef'p 1-<>-0 > z V) ' -<(O (j- >u~ --© ' 0 -Ji ·; OzO I <(I.I) U---'o- --© z:::i,. l .....I_ .....I <(uz --© ~WO.. I.I)~<( ROOf W>- NW GARDfN '° I- [)[LOW :~ - ::::, I"') LL .....I 0) --0 z -Ck: ---© +o ROOf BELOW --© z w ---© V) --@ ISSUED FOR: REV: DATE: w ----- = DEVELOPMENT PLAN 05.30.17 ~ ----- ----- " CD ----- :, v> ----- ~ ® ---© KEY PLA N ~ l • ~;''~ ~ z ffi :s ~IJ a. \ 7 ~ § -·- L..--......... PROJECT NORTH ~ BUILDING A ~ ~ LEVEL 05 0 --© ROOF PLAN '.:: • _:________g_yOf_TEMECULA __ ~ di u··r ~ ,,·-r ~ d;i ....... i4i .,_,, ~ .. ..... cit .. ➔ it .. ~ it ,. ..... ~ .. ..•. 4 ,. ..... ~·~~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ €§'~ Ji ik ik ~ ik it 4·➔~ Pl.ANNING DEPARTMENT SCALE "' 14°A: CONDITIONALLY 0 lW ~ .. ~ PPRC>Vt!f!F w SUBJlCT10T~~GSA <;__ "'ljj!~ltl,,t,.S ~ APPIIOVE - ' Cl OVAL >- 91512017 DRAWING NUMBER z g' APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885I 12 5 6 .0 9 -o ROOr 'f" L~[_B.~~$ 12.38.00..!... LEVEL 02 y 1226.00 _ VEL 1 M E M O R Y C ARE FO UN TAI N COURTY ARD NORTH ELEVATION 0 ----------< A SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" 0~~6~-~r 12::i8.50 _[VEL 04 / DECOR:~VE BALUSTERS -+,'MAi" I - = = = _(V[L 00 TYPICAL BALCONY GUARDRAIL 0 ----------, 1 SCALE: 3/8"=1'-0" IN D EPEN D EN T LI VI N G IN DEPEN D ENT LI VI N G / VI LLA GE SQUARE ENTRAN CE INDEPENDENT LI VI NG -"!-c-~-~-,T-;_11L_6_E_=~---t-.-T_IO_N ---10 1261.!,0 TO PLATE 1258.50 • (L04 .. ' ~ LCVEL OJ _d1.__l1_,!8.00 V LEVEL 02 1213.00 LEVEL 00 12-48.25 .rvn, OJ 1238.00 .EVEL 02 ' ~ 1226.00 _[V[L 01 ' "' 0 ' '.".?:. IN D EPE N D E N T LIVI N G DI NING CO U RTY A RD ASSISTED LI VI NG SOUTH ELEVATION 0 ~~----1 c SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" ' il ' :;: <r <r Cf ~ <r 1275.50 10 RODI ' rt -0 62i~~~ $ -0 Ll1;l~S-~~ .. $ ~ $ $ lfV(l 01 M EM ORY CARE i' 1238.00 LM~ 02 ' g FINISH NO TES 0 CLASS A HIGH BARREL CONCRETE S-TIL[S EAGLE ROOFING: EAGL(LIT( - COLOR: 3615 WEATHERED T(RRACOTTA 0 INTEGRALLY COLOREO J PARl STUCCO 20/JO SANO FLOAT flNISH - LA HABRA: X-73 ECG SHELL 0 INTEGRALLY COLORED J PARl STUCCO W/ R[VEALS AS OCCURS 20/JO SAND FLOAT FINISH - LA HABRA: X-820 SILVERADO 0 WROUGHT IRON RAILING ACCENT GRILLES, F[NCING. GATE COLOR: Bl.AO: POWDER COAT FlNlSH 0 ROUGH SAWN RAFTER TAILS, EAVE. FASCIA, POST & TRCLLIS STAINED: OXFORD BROWN © VINYL WINDOWS W/CLEAR GLAZING - TYPICAL IJ.ILGARD: STYLE LJNE SERIES - EXTERIOR ai.:ONZE FINISH 0 flBERGL.ASS Ct.AO WINDOWS & DOORS W/CLE.AR GLAZING D CO.YU.ON AREAS - MILGARO: WOODCLAD SERIES - EXTERIOR BRONZE FINISH © PRECASI WINDOW SILLS, SURROUNOS & BAS[ PANELS COLOR: SANDRlfl ® OECORATIV( LIGHT FIXTURE @ OECORATM: ACCENT TILES @ 21. GA CONTINUOUS 5• DC-STYLE COIJ.MERCIAL GUTTERS W/4" SMOOTH SQUARE PROFILE OOWNSPOUTS FACTORY J<YNAR FINISH: IJ.ANSARO BROWN • GENERATIONS FAM ILY OF CO M PAN IES Deve lopment Connruttion Manage ment 8601 SE Ciu1ey Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 Td.; (503) 652-0750 Fax: (503) 786-6451 www .generation1l1c.com >- I- z w :::> (j~ <(~<( 0 _Jo <( _Ju0 QN ~~CX) <(N- 1-0- 0 > z Vl ' -<(O (j- >u~ 0 -J, 0z0 I<(ll) U-' °' z::J .. _J _ _J <uz ~WCL W>- LI)~<( NW - :::> '° I- (") LL _J d) z -C£ _Jo z w (/) ISSU£0 FOR: ~OAT(: "' "" O(V(L~IJ(Nl ~ _ 05.~.17 J < ----- I= ----- " a, ----- ~ ----- ~ J<EY Pl.AN ~ O'. ffi ~ CL >- PROJ(CT NORTH i5 :, CL s BUILDING A ~ ELEVATIONS APN,#955-020-01 B PA15-1885 I 8 S 8 8 8 e 8 8 8 ~ ~~ . ~ .... G ; 3 + + ~ M EM ORY CARE FOUNTAIN COURn 'ARD ":-'-f"1...L!...l.=-=aLIJ....b==!!!!'!~~1=..:,;li_c,__:=:__'f,~J_.gg~ 0 NORTH ELEVATION SCA LE· 1/1 6"=1'-0" G e 0 8 8 8 0 8 0 ,_ '• ,.,.__:__:uso_g -..1 ~v- O ? " " 0~C~0i. I INDEPENDENT LI VI NG INDEPENDENT LI VI NG/ VI LLAGE SQUARE ENTRA NCE INDEPENDENT LlVING WEST ELEVATION SCA LE 111 6''=1'-0' 0 8 8 q, -~?602, ......... , 'o INDEPEND ENT Ll VING 0 ' ~ ./,~;~ o' "\ 0 .. -:-.,.,' 0 -ase co -~ 'V· C;; - 'o L?600 ,,,,, (,)· 0 8 0 , {) 0 6 8 G 8 0 DI NING COURTY ARD 6 o e 6 8 @ e 8 8 0 INDEPENDENT LI VJ NG. 8 'o ASSISTED LI VJNG SOUTH ELEVATION SCA LE· 1/16"=1'-0' 0 8 I 'o,- , , -:~_Qi ~0_,!f,£.~N.- .. ~ RCAJ I #a il=daa £c:::'3a,~=-daa a!=~!.....~~a>=- i' 8 8 8 6 0 " 0) ·~ G o' ---c"t'{;J':°{9 ' ' I '' I EAST ELEVATION SCALE· 1/16"=1'-0" FIN ISH NOT ES 0 CfiS5" .. :; .. !:lll'l·l', co,c«,·· s - '.5 (A(';_, ROO' ',G ·/\G_E_ ·; CO OR .16"~ W,t<-"R.'-'J "<'N ACC'lll CZ) ,-.~,~" v co.csro J <>11.~· s-cccc 7G/JC SA\.)· ~r,· · ,,s- ft ,-A~'!A ~ 7J ·CG s< ~ '''G"IA ~ co C'F) .! CJA•r s-cccc w/ '1-\/,A.S AS CCC..,R.5 ;>G/JC $/\,\.1 · QA" ,s- J,, •·A9'iA ~-!:i}G s_v~~)C 0 \\·<:i .... c-· '!O\. slA_"\C II.CC·!\" GQ .·S .. vc vc. er..·;: CO. 0~. <; ,\C-< >'Ol'l )CR CQA" '1\ 5 .. @ RO.JG•· 5,,w, :,11r·;q "A S. ~AV':. •ASCA ;,05· & •~ S s·.-. vr c 0X'0'C 9i<0W\ © "'" w-oows WjC,tAR G.A2'<C 'Y-'C,, V Cf,R:) s-v l ,r S~RCS ,~··-!OR asov/, '\S•· 0 . H' R:; ASS C_II) 't, -ccws & JOO·tS W/C._AR C J.7 ,:;. C' covvo-, f,R·AS V :;A 'C l'/Xl~C_II~ S·R·S .y"fROR ,:;-10,z:: r ,s ... @ "~· CAS" I', vaow S _s_ S,HRCv,)S & 8115( "''' 5 CO.OR 51\\JR•· ®O'CCRATVt. C••l'X'...,c(' (]) D"CORMV( AC:':r,· • '5 0 7t GA C0\0\..,C~S ~" :)G sv.t CCVV•RC1A CJ! ~'sS W/C svoo·•· so~A'~t :>R::'.J', • oow,s00..1'5 •AC'OR" -<"\IIR c,5 ... VA\SA'O 3R01'1, • GENERATIONS FAM ILY OF COM PANIES Dc,-c:lopmcnt CorntrU<:tion .\~an3gcmcnl 86 01 st: Cauley Ave nu e I Por1l:1.n d, OR 9708 6 Td.: (503) 652 0750 Fax : (S03) 786 64 S1 www.gc11cu1ioiHllc.com >- I- z w:::, 0~ <C ~<( 0 _Jo <{ QN _Ju0 Cl:'. S; 00 <{N- 1-<>-0 > z V) ' -,i:O 0- >u~ 0 -Ji 0z0 I<{ Lll U-' o- z::::> .. _J_ _J ,i:UZ O:'.W(l_ W>- Ll)~<{ NW - :::, '-0 I- (') LL _JO'.) z -~ _Jo z w C/) 5~~:-9~ ~~\I }:V• C"w··· "·"' O::> ~C • 7 BUILDING A COLORED ELEVATIONS " < > 1 0 > •---~,_-_~_ .. _PU\'"."'c_~ .. u"~"', DE"'•"'~, .. , ... T~LA .. ,NT-~~ -~ -~S .. CA.._,-,. ~ t~'j_. CONDITIONALLY o ~APPROVED·' ~ SUII.J!...C:~~~=tin:~~~~~~. AS i _____ scol."Z~1i(c - - 7 91512017 'JR.NII ,G '-,..VtF'I [ A':l\ /19~:; C/0 c· S I ~ ~ '~, ";J 'j~ L J ----- I I l"il"' ·,om, I ! ~ z,., z z,., z ~ z" z ~~. ~ ~ ~:::: ~ <t ~ C n <O :,. "1:,. _ ~~ ~,m~~ e e e a e a ~::;:::;.:: ::;~ ~r~tt~ l.'l't\\,'l~l,'l'(\ 0 I~ " ,, ' 1 5 OJ 0 I ,i a> )> p oW zZ v,O .. a, ! E& ~o 0 ' Q ! , 111~ 1111~ LINFIELD VILLAGE SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY BUILDING B 31625 RANCHO VISTA ROAD TEMECULA, CA 92592 APN: 955-020-018 PRI NT DA T[: 05.30.17 orv rr OPt,E NT P:AN nrv irw SJAMITTAl #6 DECORATIV[ BALUSTER S ' :~~~·60;$ ~ = = = ' i.l +1218.80' LEVlL 01 ' "' -- +Li~~Bo~$ ~';,.- -';,. TYPICAL BALCONY GUARDRAIL 0 ~-----------{1 SCALE: 3/8"= 1'·0" '? +L~~~- 6°; S ~ 9 EAST ELEVATION 0 -----==--=-'------------------1 B SCAL E: 1/16"=1'..0" '1266SB #) r TO ROOF \J NORTH ELEVATION 0 -------'-'---'---'------------- C SCAL E: 1/16"=1'·0" ➔L~~- 6°; s ~ 1 s +1206.60' l VEL 00 0 ' '.' ' ➔L~t~· ~O~ $ ~ -vara.eo' LEV EL 01 +1206.80" LCV[L 00 ' i.l WEST ELEVATION 0 __ ___, D SCALE: 1/16"=1'--0" FINISH NOTES 0 CLAS S A HIGH BARREL CONCRETE S-TILES EAGLE ROOFING: EAGLW TE - COLOR: J615 WEArnERED TERRACOTTA 0 INTEGRAL LY COLORED J PAR T STUCCO 20/JO SAN O FLOA l fJNISH - LA HAB RA: X-73 EGG SH£LL 0 INTEG RAL LY COLOREO J PART STUCCO W/ REVEALS AS OC CURS 20/JO SAN O FLOAT flNISH - LA HABRA: X-820 SJLVER ADO 0 WROUGHT IRON RAILING ACCENT GRILLES, FENCING. GATE COLOR: BLACK POWDER COAT nNISH 0 ROUGH SAWN RAfl ER TAILS, EAV£. FASCIA, POST & TRELLI S STAINED : OXFORD BROWN © VINYL WINDOWS W/CL[AR GLAZ ING - TYPICAL MILGARO: STYLE LINE SERIES - EXTERIOR BRONZE FINISH 0 FIBERGLAS S Cl.AO WINDOWS & DOORS W/CLEAR GLAZ ING O COMMON AREAS - MILGAR O: WOOOCLAO SER IES - EXTERIOR BRONZE FINISH © PRECAS T WINDO W SILLS, SURROUNDS & BAS E PANELS COLOR: SA1'•1DRln 0 OCCORA TM LIGHT FIXTU RE @ DECORA TIVE ACCENT TIL.ES @ 2.t. GA CONTINUOUS 5" OG-SlYLE COMIJERCIAL GUTTERS W/4" SMOOTH SQUAR E PROFILE DOWNSPOUTS FACTORY KYl'O.R FINISH: IJAN SA RO BROWN • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Dcvcl oprncnt Con1truction Management 8601 SE Causey Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 Tel.: (503) 652-0750 Fax: (503) 786-6451 www .genera.tion1llc.corn >- I- z w:::, t,~ <( ~ C!) .....10 0 <( .....Jut, QN O! S; CX) <(N- z t--0-0 > V) ' -<(O t,- >utJ 0 . .;, OzO I<( 1/J U...Jo- z::J .. .....1_.....J <uz D!wa.. w >:::, 1/) ~ <( NW -0 t-- C') LL .....JC!) z -~ .....Jo z w (/) ISSUED roe. ~~ <O "" OEVELOPM~ ~!_ 05.JQ_l7 ~ "' ----- I= -- --- :, a, ----- 51 ----- ~ K(Y PLAN ~ "' EB z :s CL r PROJECT NORTH /5 :, CL 0 BUILDING B ~ ELEVATIONS 0 '.:: _CITYOF T~!;CULA_ ci Pl>,f'.t,II NG DE PARTM ENT SCALE "l ~ CONDITI ONALLY "' 0 ~PPRO\fefr w :SUBJECT TO TKl!IOINGS ~~IOM@Pf'ROVAI..AS !;, olPP!IOVEO ll'le"' ~ OU E•C PIKIVAL 0 r 9/5/2017°~ z iE CL APN:#955-020-018 PA15-1885 I 6' 8 -0 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" 0 8 :..;-r;tt~ - .. g~~;~ _,_ ' 0 0 EAST ELEVATION SCALE· 1/16"=1'-0" 6 e El e 0 \ -0 \ \_0 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16"=1'-0" 8 ·iy~~:~~' 0 -:~~1!90:i;~ -~ 0 0 WEST ELEVATION SCA LE· 1/1 6"=1'-0" ~ffi 6t~ 6 -0 ro" \__-'_) FIN IS H NO TES o c /ISS " -·G- ',A~'<~- covc.e- '· s - .ES ,,,c [ '<OO•"NG CAC.[: "l cc o= .16"5 w-11· '?'D ·;:.~ACCl"A 0 ~~~i"s~~JC~~~;: ;\~ ;:q· S/:~;'?A X 7j CCC S·,' (v ,·•c~11. v CO.O'?-::: ~ """" s-cccc w/ q;-v,A s 11s ccc.as ]C/JC SA'\'J · CA" -,5. _I, ··ASl<A ~ 87C S V•~.o\')Q 0 y,qo_,c,< QO, RA !\G -cct-,- G~· ·S .. '-C"G. GI\[ cc OQ n AC.: "OWJ~"! cc« '\ S·· G) aocc- SAwr,., ',A'~:::q "A.S 'AV·. '-"SCA "05" & ·q,: __ 15 s111,,0 ox-o-c aecw, © VV, W1f\QOWS W/Ci_t,C/. G fll",C l":1CA V.C"-'<J 5·y_[ \E stvr s ;_y~QOQ BQO\70 ,,5,. 0 r 8· 'IC ASS C..J\'J VI -ocws & )OCQS W /C f/lQ G.N '.C Q CCVVO'- f,Q, AS v .GAQC woox:.r.J S: q ,5 rx•E~ tH nrw,1, r,, S·· @ ;;,.i,c,,s, V/',.)CW s .. s. S;,,'HO ... v::s & i.l/\S~ 0A,~~S CO. Q~- SAV}R ~- 0 JCCCRA.Vl .•C··· --X:"uR· @D:CO~l\1V•ACC£f,-·L[S 0 )t. CA co,,,,J0.5 ~- o::; s-v.r CCVV·RCA C.,TT'IS '11/4" svoo-» so.,,,'E "'<O•· • oow-s=o.rs • GENERATIONS FAtvIILY OF COM PANIES Dcwlopmcnt Conilruction .\1an3gcmcnt 8601 SE Cau.cr Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 ra., (503) r,52 0750 Fa,c (503) 786 M 5l www.gcncration,llc.com >- I- z w::J 02 <(20'.) _J 0 0 <( = u0 QN °" ~ 00 <(N- z >- °' 0 > <I) ' -<(O 0- >u~ 0 -Ji OzO I<( lll U-' °' z:::l .. _J _ _J <uz Q,'WC.. W>::J l/) ~ <( NW '() >- (") LL _J Cl) z -0:::'. _Jo z w (/) 5:'u~_::~ 'FV »c : o:~r.c"v:.!:-.:_P1A, O:>."!c ·7 BUILDING B COLORED ELEVATIONS "' = l,---,-_,,..""'"_11'\Sc,"'rv"o,"'_"'TE;;;..__;;;ec"'u"~'"-~-~-=--. I ~ P\.Ar-.t-llNG DEPARTMENT SCA.:. .,') ·,:~Cj_ CONDITIONALLY o "'P PROVE B11• u SUBJ!~~~i~=n~~~~~~~~~M § ___ scoft.-~lc}~? ,., 9/5/2017 J·M l'I ,::; ,:.JViE.'1 [ ,.l. ~ 7 1 □ 1~.J TYPE 1 V 1. 170 SF TYPE 2Y 1 120 SF TOTAL PER BLDG X 8 BUILDINGS TOTAL COTTAGE UNITS ROOF PLAN 0 ------11 SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION 0 ----1B SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" r-----, I I I I I I ------, I I I r-----, I I I I I I r------ 1 I I COTTAGES - INDEPENDENT LIVING UNIT TYPE $17[ COUNT 32 -;~~A-~-~-, E_ 1 L_ 18 E __ =V_ 1 ,_A_ 0 __ T_IO~N-----0 ...,:.,.cE_AJ.A_E_R_;-,;-.~-,~-t-T_I_O_N -----10 GARAG~ l ~;oi; $ s-ORAG~1~;oi; $ FINISH NOTES G) CLASS A HIGH BARREL CONCRET[ 5-lil[S EAGLE ROOflNG: EAGLELITE - COLOR: 3615 WEATHERED TERRACOTTA 0 INTEG RAL LY COLORED J PART STUCCO 20/JO SAND fLOAT flN!S'i - lA HABRA: X- 7l ECG SHELL 0 INTEGRAL LY COLORED J PAR T STUCCO W/ REV EA LS AS OCCURS 20/JO SANO FLOAT FINISH - LA HABRA: X-820 SILVE:RADO 0 WROUGHT IRON RAILING ACCENT GRILL[S, FENCING, GATE COLOR: BLACK POWDER COAT FINISH © ROUGH SAWN R.6.n[R TAILS, EAV[, f"ASC!A, POST & TR[LUS STAINED: OXFORD BROWN 0 VINYL WINDOWS W/CLEAR GLAZING - TYPICAl MILGARO: STYLE UN[ SERIES - EXTERIOR BRONZE FlNISH 0 INSWING fRENCH VINYL PATIO DOOR - MILCARO: 2-PANCL (1 flXED} TUSCANY SERIES W/CLEAR CLAZINC & BRONZE EXTERIOR flNISH © PR[CAST WINDOW SILLS, SURROUNDS & BAS[ PANELS COLOR: SANDRJn © OECORAT!V[ LIGHT FIXTURE @ DECORATIVE ACCENT TILES @ 24 GA CONTINUOUS 5· QC-STYLE COMMERCIAL GUTTERS W/4" SMOOTH SQUARE PROflLE DOWNSPOUTS fACTORY KYNAR flNISH: IJ.ANSAAO BROWN @ flBERGLASS SINGLE PANEL DOOR - MILGARD: ESSENCE SERIES BRONZE flNISH W/CLEAR SPEAK EASY @ STEEL RECESS[O PANEL INSULATED G1,RAGE DOOR CLOPAY: CM'YON RIDGE COLLECTION - t.lAHOGANY WALNUl FINISH • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Deve lopment Co n1tru ction Mmage mcnt 8601 SE Caiuey Avenue I Portland, OR 97086 Tel.: (503) 652•0750 Fax: (503) 786·6451 www .gcncration1lle,com >- I- z w:J 0~ <C~u 0 _Jo <( _ju0 QN ~~<!l <(N- t--0-0 > z V, ' -<(O 0- >u~ 0 -Ji OzO I<( llJ U...Jo- z:::, .. _j _ _j <uz ~WO.. W>- ll) ~ <( NW - :J '° I- (') LL _j C() z -~ _Jo z w (/) ISSUED fOR· ~ DATE: DEVELOPM~- ~~ 05.30.17 ----- ----- ----- ----- K[Y PLAN EB PROJECT NORTH BUILDING C PLANS & ELEVATIONS APN,#955-020-01 B PA15-1885 I © r.:- - 7 ,,. ... ,, -1:-_--:;·_,.._,_ ·- 1. ~ I I ,, I .:'.--7' -4'' □,J e, _L - - - - - - -,- - - - - - - _J _ __,_j I ,; I I I r:---~+-~--i'' f J I I ,, I I l I l I ,, I I L,_ - _ __-_; j__ _ - - _ _j c~ @· L_ - '.J ·.;: - ~! I I. L - - - - - - - -- ___j- I I I I ___ l _ □ -t;i- ------71/ l I I L, I I ,j -.:! - i ~, I ' I -"'~_J " 'I L_ _ ---- -~ _·_j ·© "' vo ·v s /· ·1.c s:- JV _____:_,~C S· -G-A D: ~ [3 JG x s i..,. J \::s 0 @ G SIDE ELEVATION SCALE· 1/8"=1"-0" ROOF PLAN SCALE 1/8"=1'-0'' e @ @ - =-l•]; ?;; {9 ·v3·~Jr~ @ " - . _f: - - - ®· ®-· @· ·© 0 G -----{-- @ ·® ® -© COTTAGES - INDEPENDENT LIVING @ C_Qyr-.· / 1 L FRONT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" 0 o- CA•M~{JZ~' ~ S"n°'<flC~. ~-i: ~ @ CAS1 s-cv, I', vaow S .• s. S..;•HOu,os. A'\) 3AS[ ::,"" S CO 0~: SA'\ lJt:i :-· ® OcCO•~Mv~ :1=.c,n c►-1 •1x·uql @ 1-:CO'<flll/i. Ace,,·. 0 S'E[. <t• Ct SS! J 011-..:. GA~AC' 'JOO<t C_Q::>AV cev-o-, ~JC[ cc .. ::c10, r v s- 10 IIA"C•1 l-?IJ FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8"=1'-0" SIDE ELEVATION SCALE: 1 /8"= 1 '-0" @ -© REAR ELEVATION SCALE· 1/8"=1'-0" FINISH NOTES o C...ASS,. ·•C•· ;;A'<'<'. co-cs;-. s ,s ,,,c, sec 'IC 1',cA·-,<t,; 1fR'lA::o··t, v CO.O'FU J ;:,11q· s-cccc A "~"" ).. 7;'; · cc 5 ... @ ..,·,c•tA v co C4·_J .3 ;:,18· s-cccc ,,cc;,· w; ~~v,A.s A.S OCC.,'6 70/J'.) St,\D r_c11· \,5 .. 0 w-c,c-' 'IC\ RA.\G f,\:J t.CC•'\· GR r s []_;.:_:,: "CW)·'< cc11· C"\S•· '2) ·X"0S· ~C.,G· Sl<W'. --<11-•:o ·,. 5. ::.v~. •ASCII & ·--r s se vrc 0X'0'I0 :H:>\'I\ © V\"~ 1'/ \;:)QW!, G~/12 ,\G ~ GA'~i) s·v ! S'.l-1,[5 fK"fR:o<; [HC\/' · \ 5., (j) -~s:~~"·t~~; ~,;'c_::,0c~~c~ -& ~l~~\~' 1 ;,~~'~--. ~· .. ~-~· (v r 3·~R(. /,SS S ,_G_( :>:,.•,~ '.JOO"! V ~CA.RJ [SS~"-Ct S: R S '3'1C1';/' ••~S- W/ Ccl/lR 51>,:,..; t/15" @ ~~ ~:~~;- ::~;.JVAlR~c :~0~0.t~~~,~~ ... ~ ... ~~ i·r~- ";:, ~1··."~// sc-vs AC"CQ' .;v'\N< r \ S•· '\ VA\SAR} E'iCW'\ • GENERATIONS FAMILY OF COMPANIES Dcwlopmem Cons truction .Vlanagcmcm 8601 SE Cao"'}" Avenue I Portland, OR 970116 Tel. : (503) 652 0750 Fax: (503) 786 6451 www.gcncratiomlk.com >- r z w::::, 02 <(2u 0 .....JQ <( QN .....Ju0 Cl! S; O'.l <(N- ,-O,Q > z (/) ' -<(O C)- >u8 0 -Ji 0z0 I<( L/l 0--'e>, z::i .. .....J - .....J <(uz Cl! w (L W>- L/) ~ <( NW - ::::, ,o>-- C") LL.....JCO z -0::'. ....Jo z w (/) SSi..~: ; 0'1 <s,V )/,- ~•v£ C"~~~'--- lb.!C__:_f_ BUILDING C COLORED PLANS & ELEVATIONS _____QD'___QE!~MECULA _ Pl.At,.1111NG DEPARTMENT SCI\ c 2~ ~ON~ITIO_NALLY APPROVEB1'' SU8JECTTOT~GS ,__Q___INSO~PPROV.U., .. ""PROVE Ila) U Cll'VrPll:OVAL _ _sco .coo r • __ 9/5/2017 )RAW \C '\.JV3~;:, ? > C 0 > U TILI TY NO TES WATER: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT -12135 WINCHESTER RO. TEMECl/l.A, CA 92590 (951} 296-6930 SEWER. EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATf:R OISll?ICT 2270 TRUMBi.£ ROAD PERRIS. CA 92570 (951) 928-3777 POWER: SO CAL EDISON CO. JJ5! C. FRANCIS ONTARIO, CA 91761 (8 00} 93 0 -852 9 G4S: SO CAL G4S CO. P.O. BOX JOOJ REDLANDS, CA 92373 (800} .,27-2200 PHONE: llf:RIZON P.O. BOX 5156 TAMPA. Fl 33675 (800} 922-020., I I CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN LIN FIELD l,1LLA GE Cl TY OF TEMECULA, CA I I I LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL "C'" OF LI.A NO. PA-02-02,/6 iD,CAft.1'i'l,V,'ff~ ?'"AV} 1)"fft0Ti/lCKU6ll£H/AQ flW-tmo, IN !}£ OIY (T 1lMIUA awrr (T ~tl" swr (T ~ li£aYq(J) #!'al 29, mJASIA5lliULNTMl .,W.kl?lat? (T ~ RW'illi N;OAS 90/NO( AliElXR)(T5UMYC11/IUJ'la::tJ\'l15. Aa3" !6nm.o!Jt IN2 l6M ff liElXR) ff 5llM>S (T 5'fl) ao»: /D,C ,W'l" ~y «smEEJJ AS fW.tllS: aiAOD\C AT n£ CENlllUC INIFRS£C'lOV o: Rf'OO WSi,f liD(O NIJ Rl9lJ l.lla4 AS 5'0IN ClV 540 !lWa') ff Sl.lMY,- ooa: SQJ1!-l-l!N!'52" [AST, toe S4t' CEMlJY,E (T fN.00 lfS!A ~ A OSTA\C£ (T Bl!l .5.9 FlE7 10 n£ flit£ IVNT ff ll71WAG' »oa: SWIH Kl'l80J" WT, l.E,411,',(j 54'0 aN!lN,'{; A DSTM« tT ~'WSl5 flET I{) AR:1NT in\C OV !l-£Sl'lJT}£R YJN'ff SW OOt1l t; HOC[ saJ!H J[f5.J'5{;" HlST, Ai.0.C S4V !D./Tf£Ji!.Y oc A DSTA\C£ (Y '5.8? flIT ll)AVMQER:JN! WS40!xJIMR.Y/J'£· »oa: saJ!H 1?27".JJ" &fST, WU'& SW saJ!JOlY oc A D.m\Cl" o: 197.51 llili n-oa; SaJ!H SJ.J.1:Jtl" H£ST. A oszea tr 21552 flET,· !l-OC£ .v;Ymi81""879"HITT, A!JSfN-II(F.595.81/lEl; l>O,C£AOi'!Ha1!8'!/£AST.ACISTA\CEer..R?..i5/lEl; »oa: AOi'!H!.lN7tYJ"H!ST. APSU\CEer.atr-uflEl lOAfQNTl.n\C()V /}£!a/ll-lR.YMOfftThlfY/J'c(F,9l'O,Q WSTA ~ t£l,l(;,U.((J/lI7 5l1Jll-G!.Y,A£ASlHDAlRGD"A\Cl.a"rFS40R+'OOKSTA,ID4!JaMlRJl£AS" 9-()ft{ ()V S40 /,l"Q'.l/V (T .svi\-£1;' »oa: ,'Oi'f}-l(lf.J6f}/lt[ST A OSTA \CE er ,U.aJllIT IOA FONT l.n\C av I}£ CEMlRJ/£ er SW ~\00 WSTA ~ ,S,ff) IVNT .-1:'..V ID,C R£ /E&,W/C erAM;N-U.'llNTQ.li\C W\Oll£~YAVJMW.CAR61.6er l6ala:Jfll7, A~ ~10.9,'/)fQ,VTtc,WS saJ1H !l"!l'-O"EAS,; »oa IQm£4STOil.Y A!.O'-.C C£MllaJ'£ A'lJ SW CUTI£ !M(U)t A~ A\QE er Jr,t,21}1: A-V Mt' O'SlA'.(t' er 8852-1 rar TO Tl£ [£{JIN,\C er A TMaNT~- LINAFL D CHRIS TIA N SCHO OL , / / / / / I -1 I \ \ ') \ ' \ / r_ O'SlA \CE er !2:5.JI fEEl TO S40 1lif.£ fO,W tr E£(),W,',C OWNER/DEVELOPER: GENERA TIONS, UC 8601 SE CA USEY AVE: SUITE",, PORTlANO, OREGON 9708 6 (.S0J) 6.52-0750 ENC/NEER: KWC ENGINEERS 1860 COMPTON AVENUE. SVITc 100 CORONA, CA. 9286!-JJ70 (951) 7J-l-21J0 ATTN: BRANDON Al &4RNm P.£,P.I..S. ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER APN 955-020-006 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY TOPO MAP FL.OWN J-J0-07 BY ARRO WHEA D MAPP/NC EST7AIATED EARTHWORK OUANTITIES ON~SITE EARTHWORK 0UANTITl£5 CRADINC SUMMARY CUT (CY) Fill (C. Y) RA W OVANllllES 69,{X}O ,57,{X}O TOTA/.M¥,,f .- 15.!iBAO?CS AN~ OF OISTl/HB4NC£ (ONSITF) • !J. 75 ACHCS M'C1 or QfVIJl&M'([ /O([SJTFJ • a M ACNB: ARO OF l}ISTl/li'84NC C (CROSS) .- 1'1. #1 ACfi'ES M2I£ THC Aiit?l< OlWlll TIES Nfl< BffN CS""4 T£0 BY IHC ENCINC£N FOR ~lOPAICNT REWW PtJIH'OSES CA'II.Y! MSC OUAN llllES 00 NO T fr£TUCT ANY SHRINKAGE; SWlWN(;, Sl/BS/0£NC£. OVER [XO(V,,f ,.UV CW ANY SPtCW. C(),vl}IT/OtVS THA T "4Y BE SPtClfiEO IN THE PR£UAIIN4N Y stNI.S REPORT. SJNC£ /HE ENCIIUR O(NN(}T CONTROi. TH£ O'ACT VElNOO OR I/EANS l/S£{) BY TH£ t:aVmACTOli' OiJ/rfNC ~ £ll"m4 J;Uv, M::W CAN TH£ CNC!NllN ClWWHE£ THC EXA CT SOIL S ~S (Jl,(R !H£ $JI£, TH£ lNCINEER ASSl/ll£S NO NESPONSIBlE FOR fitW. £AK/Hlt'OHK OlJWllll£S. THC CONIRACTOR SHAU 0£TEKl,IN £ HIS OWN OlHN llllES ANO HE IS SOLELY R£SPONSIBlE FON /JCT£li'l,(!#WC TH£ IUKJlfA¥T ANO COST OF IVPORT/£KR:Y?T ANO O!HOi' CIW)IIK; OlWfflTJCS FOR THIS PHOJ£CT. LECEND OF SYMBOLS &- ABBREVIATIONS.· ~ rr::r LIGHT PO WER POL£ l;f TS TRA FFIC SIGNAi. oCB CA TCH &tS!N o GI CRATE !NI.ET oS SICN :F/: ~!EZ~T -o- TPP TE"UPORAR Y PO WER POI..£ oU AIE"ffR o POST oV VALl-'f" l.B.O. BLOW OFF :xv ~:fi_fSE VAi. V£ □ VB VllLITY BOX ~fte ~~~ztg gifg~ Jgf:ic ASPH ASPHAL T BLOC BUii.DiNG cec CVRB &- GUTTER C/2. C£NrrRLIN£ CONC CONCRlTE COR CORNER OW'Y' ORM"WAY n Y EAS TE"RLY E Et.ECTHICAL EX. EKtSnNG £1. £1.£VAllON EP £OGE OF PAVEMENT FF FINISHED FlOOR Fl. Fi.OW LINE ElEVAnON Cl CRATE INL ET PAI.Al TREE HP HIGH POINT /CV IRRIGA TION CONTROi. VALVC NO T£: NOT All SYMBOLS/ ABBREJM TJONS ..w4 Y B£ USED. IRRC LP '""'· MIN. N'i.Y PWT PROP. pp PT RET rr! SMH SD S~Y W'i.Y CLF WIF DH -R-- IRRICAllON lOW POINT AIAXIAII.IAI MINIAIVM NORTHERLY PAVEMENT PROPOSED PO WER POL E POINT RETAIN/NC RICHT OF WAY SYC'AAI ORE TREE SEW£R ..w4NHOI.£ STORM ORAIN SOV THERI.Y HrSTERLY CHA IN I.INK FENCE WROUGHT IRON FENCE OV£RHEA0 VllUTY UNES RIDGE LIN£ ~ RIGHT OF WAl1/PARCEL UN£ BO UNOAR Y BVILOINC SETB4 CK PER RES/0. ZONING CENTERLINE PROP. EA SO,IENT EX. £AS£MCNT £X. CVRB ANO GUTTER WR OUGHT IRON FENCE RETAINING WALi. WROUGHT IRON FENCE PAn"O WALKWAY R/W DEOICAllON SLOPE -so- PROPO SED -11/6- Pl-t' STORM /JRAIN PROPO SED 121/18- HOPE STORM ORAIN L/NFIFL D CHRIS 17AN S CH O OL = I) nus Ofl'£1.0Ptl£NT PROPOSE S TO RECOR!) A RCc»"l'i'OCA.l IJRAINACE AGH£EV£NT W!IH l1Nfi£1.1) sa,m FOR CROSS I.OT IJRNNAG£ ANO TH£ l/S£ OF r¥FSIT£ 0/WNACE F..4Cll.lllES f"OR Ol1£N llON PlJRPOSlS. ,o· 80' SCAI.£ IN FEET 120' I \ PREPARED BY:· ; I I I ✓ t I .----C-O_N_C_E_P_TU_II\_L_G_RA_D_IN_G_P._LA_N_S_---1 1 LINFIELD VILLA GE CITY O F TEMECULA ~ [ f------------------------,~ PREPARED FOR: ~ • ~ ~ f---------+-------""1 ------lf----t~ i (U' PROPOSED PAV["Al["NT ~ l-£XISTINC PAI/Cl,ll"NT ~ ~ I RANCHO V!SlA RtW T'tPICAJ. SECTlQN "" 1l ~:WAll BU/lOINC A FF= 1226.00 (LEV!"l I) "'--EXIST/NC SURFACE PROP. VcROllRA WALL SECUOJt E-E SEr;TlONA-A At41N ENW T'tPICAJ. SECOQN "" UAl!T or EXIST/NC V£C£TAT£0 AR£4 I EXIST/NC VCCETATEO AREA I I i BUILD/NC C4 rr - 1203.,1 BUllOINC A ff _. 1213.00 (LEVEl 0) \_~XISTINC SURFACE PROP. SURFACE 6' PCC CtlllfJ ,t Gllf'ffR ,,,. /j/J' ISO' '-EXIST/NC SURFACE PROP. 1-f'"ROURA WAll OAYI..ICHT SECTlQNB-B 6• PC C CVRtl JO' ACCESS RtW T'tPICAL SECTlQN {UNREl,I} WAY &M ASf,~E A 4: &M AS/1.E 'B'l SECUQN f-f N,S RANCHO ~TA RQ,W PROP. AC PAVFM£NT ~ PROP. PERIMETER FENCE NANChfJ l(S'}jt R/W HOOi I IW,ICHO l-1STA (EJ'IST/NC /.IIPH()$£0 ROW Sm££T) f.--~{"""'=~· ~S1""=;"£T7"~"""=""°'=~'1-+-~v u· "" J1' l:WtZICHT f1:_0W ( EXIST/NC RQ.WWAY 'NT EXISllNC PAV01£NT 9£NCH ,,. fkt_XISTINC j RQ40WAY ;s,I)' UNfiElO CHRIS!l4N scHOOJ 7 wsn11.J h--~==-'-==~-=-;L SURFACE OAYUCHT 'NT EX!SllNC PAVDIENT 6' Pee ~ 1:· C UR'B POI CITY or llMf CUA STD. OW:. NO. 202 25' ACCl3:$' RtW T'tPICAI, S£CT7QN &M ASII.E t' 4: Z1' "" BUILOINC Cl FF• 1206.3 ,,. C/l T£HIW. OITT?FLOW BYPASS STl?t/C T7JHE [I/ VA /ION VII VI t,l(}(J{IJA8 WEllANO WITH IN{fRN41, OVEl?Fl.QW B>PASS STR(&'Tl/RE QETAILS "" 2.0K PROP. SURFACE 'II:·,- SECTION c-c "" PRIVAr[ SroRM DRAIN PR<JPOSEO WO/.IP BASIN 8 1199.50 BOT. 1200.00 w.5 -- - __ I ---- PROP. AC PAIIFAIENT 010-Rfi:.rtt: BASIN A/F=:=----ec-'---'2;;;· 0 .. -- .... -~ 1205.7 BOT. J_ ~ ,,~ .. ~ \_EXIST/NC SURFACE SECTION c-c "" IWl'CHO "1STA ROW PROP. PER!AIDrR FENCE fl /5.J' UNFIE£0 WAY EX!SllNC SURFAC~ SECTlQNQ-0 "" 2• rHICK PEA GRA\fl 6" P(RFORATfD P.V.C. AT 10' O.C .. S•0.5.f MIN. l)A)"(JCHT J1JlIL I. INVERT or PCRFORATCD PIP[ SHALL NOT 8[ GR[Ar[R THAN JO" FROM 8/tSIN BOTTOU. J,IJN/J.IUM 2" GRAm SECTION ABO~ ,op OF PIPE ANO eaow BOTTOIJ OF PIP€. 2. CLOHOUr ON UNOCRDRAJN NOT SHOWN FOR Cl.ltRfTY. J. COUNTr RCCOAIM[NDCD PLANT UST FOR THC 8451N IS INCWDCD IN TH[ R[PORT. BIQ-;R£7fMlON BASIN QETAILS "" vf!~ctC \__EXIST SIDEWALK [NCIN[fR[Q 'iQll N[Q/A RfO(IIR[ll[NTSc r>e OQHH1) n. Af1M 9i'.U. ££ mmsw u- B1f UfERlil.. CCU'<HNT NI) 15" t:1iGAI-IC CO/,fJ(NJff, Br Kl.Lil; oo.JJUXIDPF«R1DI\N:£JDff.11CWERN.crM1aOITSHN..L ££ A Cl..'$ A SNDY LOW 1fp sat. ~T IHT'S 1>C fWa SP["7[]) Ii TAil.£ ll2.CW. T>£ CRGANC (X)ll'(HJ{f 5HN..L l£ MTRCaR sr.d8lJZED caFOST. 15-20 .,, 5-10 ,,.., t I .-------------:=-=-=-=-::--:-=:--::-:--:-:-:--=---jl CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS ~ GENERATIONS VILLAGE CITY OF TEMECULA ~ ! I-P.-'R6-PA_R_'EO_fi_'OR._: ---ji I ~ f..---------11--~:"':" ..... ~~~'t'.':"~~--ll----l' ~ ~ PREPARED BY.· PLANTING NOTE$ ELANTIN4 LEYEND A. CONTRACTOR 15 TO ll<EVIEW PLANS, VERFY SITE CONDITIONS AND PLAHT OJANTITIE5 FRIOR TO INSTALLATION. c.otfl.lCT5 BETUEEN TI-E SITE AND Tl-IE~ PLANS OR WITI-IIN Ti-ESE. PLANS 51-iALL BE eROLluUT TO Tl-£ ATTENTION OF ne O.I.NER'S AUTl-lORIZED llcER-:1:SENTATl',lf AND THE CITY Cf TE1ECULA FRIOR TO LANDSCAPE INSTAU.ATION. Al-IT DEVIATION FRct1 Tl-<E PLANS OR 5PEC"'ICAT10Nf, IS TO I-IAVE IJ.RITTEN APFSOVAL. 8. ALL n;:EES ~ALL MAVE A M/Nlt'l.t1 l' CALIPER AT A POIKT lo INCi-ES A50\IE ROOT BALL. ALL OTI-ER ME~S 5llCI-I AS tU"leER OF CAHES. BALL 51ZE:&, QJALITT DE&IGNATIOMS. ETC. SI-IALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITM ne LATEST 5TANDAA:D5 OF ™E 'Al"ERICAN ~RY AHO LANDSCAPE ASSOCIATION' _ _.n!,.org C. LANDSCAPE ARCMITECT 5HALL APPROVE PLANT MATERIAL Pl.4Cf11Et,IT BY CCNTRACTOR FRIOR TO IN&TALLATION. D. SEE PLANTlr-6 DETAIL& FOR PLANT!NC, AND 5TAKn-t:. AND C.l'rlt-t:". llcEGIJ!llcEt'ENTS. E. FERTILIZER FOR ALL 6RCU-1D COYER AREAS &MALL 6E AS !FECIFlED WITI-IIN Tl-E 5PECFICATIOl'6. F. F!EFER TO 5PECF!CATIOM5 FOR STANDARDS OF MATERIALS AND UJOFa(MAN&I-IIP. 6. f<EA:R TO CIVIL PLANS FOR 6l'1F' PLANS t r.f'.GIUll'<EMENT&. M. CONTRACTOR TO INCLUDE IN 1-115 8\D Ti.E llcEPAIR OF ANT AND AU DAHA6E llcESUl.ll),r;, FROM INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. FlfPAIR TO INClOOE ALL DAMACrED IRRIGATION AND PL.<lNTING ITEM&. CGff,IECT TO EXIST!Nu CONDITla-lS. I ne LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SI-IAI..L MAINTAIN AI..L PlANTED AREAS BT MEANS Of CONHNJOJS WATE~. PRI.NINCI, RAISINC, TFlf:E BAI..LS ~ICM SETTLE BELOW GRADE. AFPLICATION Of SPRAYS !U,4ICH ARE NECESSARY' TO KEEP TI-E PlANTINC"sS FFlf:E Of Jt6ECTS AND DISEASES. FE!ll"TILIZ!Ncs. UEEDll't;i,, ROLLINi:'.'J. l10J.lf,j(j . ED<i!Nu, Rl:SEEDING. AND/OR OTHER 0F£RATIONS- NECES&ART FOR FROFER CA1<£ /JND UACEEP. ne LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SMALL MAINTAIN AI..L PLANTINCiS A5 5PECF!ED ABOVE FOR A PERIOD Of NN:TY ('3/D)DATS.CONTACT Oll>ER FOR ONE TEAR SERVICE CONTRACT. COITRACTOR TO WAI..K LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION WIOJ.NER TO INSURE THAT EYfRTTH!NG IS IN IOClRICING O,.OER AND TMAT lME PLANT& ARE MEAL THY AND I& READY TO BE TAIC.EN OVER BT ANOTMER MAINTENANCE cct1PANT IF AFPLICA8lE. J. 6U66TIMIa-lS IN TYPE. AND/OR DEVIATIONS IN SIZE OR GlJANTlrr FRCt"1 TME AFPRO'Y1:D L.tlNDSCAFE OR IRRIGATION PLANS SI-IALL NOT BE FEF<f"!lraD WITHOIJT PRIOR URITTEN APPROYAL Ri.C('1 Tl-I: LANDSCAPE ARCHITl:CT REC.AADING ALL SUBSTtMla6. K. THE CONTRACTOR Sl,jAI..L CCM'IF<f"! LOCATIONS OF ALL lll/LITIES PRIOR TO &TARTINCi ANY IF!RluATION /JND IN5TAU.ATION Of PLANT MATERIALS. L. IRRIGATION ON TMIS PROJECT TO~ TO STATE WATER EFFICIENT MODEL Of<Dlt-WICE &T/JNDAADS AND WILL INCORPORATE RAINS ~. MATCH PF?fCIPITATJON MEADS ANP DROJC,Ml TOI.ERANT Pl.ANT MATERIAL. t1. FINJ5M 6RAOE TO ee I' BELOW TOP Of CURB OR WALK FOR nR= AREAS. 2' FOR 6RQ.H> COVER ARE A&. N. 6RO..ND COVER PlANTINC, BED& TO BE TOP DRE&SED WITH A I JS' AND &I-Re PLANTIN'1 BED& TO BE TOP DRESSED WITH 3' LATER OF RECYCLED &1-RDDED CEDAR OR REDWOOD BAA'tC t1JLCM. &LOPE& TO BE MJLCHED WITH &TA&.IZING PRODtJCT&. NO FILTER FA5Fl:IC. 0. PROPERTY 0.H:R SHALL BE Rl:SPONS!el..E FOR MAINTAJN!Nc. LANDSCAPE A6 DEPICTl:D. P. ALL TREE& IUTHIN !">' OF HARDSCAPE ELEMENT&, SUCH A5 cse e. WALLS, el.JILDIN65- OR WALKS. SHALL BE F'ROVIDED WITH I&' DEEP ROOT BARRIER CONTROi. DEVICE& b' LINEAR BARRIER WITH GRA vEL 6ACIO'ILL. 11.U.W.dseproot.cor.1 Q. ALL LANDSCAPE AREA SMALL CGff"OfiiM TO CITY OF TB"ECULA CITY•IUDE DESICil-l GUIDELltE& R. DESIC":,N INlBIT, ACCENT &1-RJeS ARE U&ED AT ENTRT LOCATICNS. CiATHERINCI LOCATIONS AND ALONCi PEDESTRIAN AND YfHICULAR ACCENT POll'll&. &cFi!EENINC:i &l,R.e& ARE USED ALONCi PROPE!ll"TT LINE WALLS. PAA'tCINC:i ST)la.lCTUF!ES, TRASM ENCLo&uRE&. ETC. TO HELP MITICiATE TI-E t1PACT Of &AID AREA&. MASS!Nu &Mlia.65 ARE LISED to FILL IN Fc£HAININC:, AREA5 ANP RlRTI-ER ESTABl..I51-1 THE AREA& Pl.ANTED WITH ACCENT SHRJB6 . 6. TREES AND SI-RIBS SHALL BE FLACE.D A MIN!t1.11 Of S' AWAY FR01 WATER METERS. 6AS METERS. OR SEUER LATERAL.SI A HINIM.N 0: It>' AWAT FR01 UT(LITY POLES! AND A MIN1t1.11 OF 8' AW.AT Ri.C('1 FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE DEPARTMENl &PRIM<i..ER AND STANDPIPE c.ct,,IECTIONS. T. CONTACT THE crrr a: TEMECULA FlAt+IIN(i, DEPARlMENT TO SCHEDULE REOJIRED IRRIGATION AND LANDSCAPE INSP!:CTIO,!S PRIOR TO Cor-t1ENCH'.::, u.t:lRK = 0 LACiERSTROENIA INDICA ARelITU61.NEDO {'":"',.,trE~~&~n:eEs ", <- ,_.,. LANCEA CERCIS OCCIDENTAL.IS NTFR1PB Offi N SPACE .., 0 !3RACMTCI-IITON POf'UI..NE°US 6LEDJT6IA TRIACAN"Tl-lO& CHITALPA T~TENS-I& CRAPE MTRTI..E 6TRAl.i.eERRY TREE CALl~IA 5YCAMORE 24' 60)( AFRICAN SLMAC UE6TE~ REDelJD 24' 60)( 2-'' 60)( 24' 60>< 24' 60>< M MUI.Tl STANDARD L Ml~ 6RANCM STANDARD STANDARD OPEN SPACE ""' EXISTING VEGITATED AREA BOTTLE TREE HONET LOCUS-T CI-UTALPA «r= LOT SMADE TRE E QJERC!JS ILEX l-40LL Y OAK &AN CHQ YISTA RO AR STREET JEE E .. o-llTALPA TASl-l<£NTENSl6 CMITALPA = MAO'ADYENA l.NCiUIS-CATI CAT'S CLAW VINE 24' 60)( 24' 60>< 24' eox PERIMETER c OPEN SPACE JBANSlllct:l 8) Q..E ROJS N::IR.IFOLIA CAI..IFOfiN1A 1..IYE OAK 24'60>< PLATAH.15 RACEMOSA CALlf<ClR,jlA SYCAMORE 24' 60>< POFULUS Ff<fMONTU FREMONT'S 24' eox COTTONWOOD CQIJ BI!ABt! !RE ES @ GEIJERA PARYFLORA AU5TRAJ..IAN WILLOW 24' eox AR5/JTUS I.NE DD STRAl.i.eERRT TREE 24'60>< CERCI& OCCIDENTAL.IS u.ESTERN REDBUD 24' 60>< 24' 60)( 24' eox S GAL.LON 31625 7!0l?Js- A1-A4 !NOTE, REFEiiTo ARCHIT<CT'& 011' Pt.AN FOR OUTPOOI< RJ,><IME NOTE, SEE SEPARATE ATTAC+-f'1ENT FOR LANDSCAPE DESICil-l 1-llCiHLICiHT& FOR VARIOUS AFi!EAS UATH!N TI-E PROJECT AREA CALCULATION$, SITE • 1!">!>8 ~ ACRES. 14!,!, NET ACFlf:S E><ISTINc. LANDSCAPE AREA • 0 &.F. E><IS-Trt,IG, YfGETATED Of'EN 5f'ACE TO REMAIN • bf>.&«, SF. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE Ali!EA • e-4)&0 &.F. LANDSCAPE AREA LOCATED UATHIN R.O .W. • S~ S.F. 6I0-EiWALEAIX.MP AFl£A • 15~1 &.F. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA • ~.t,13 5.F. ✓ 1 l ~ ~ ~ FESnlCA MAIRE! ,_ 1-ELICTOTRlCHON SEMPERVIRENS t;0:❖•:0;:, 5TIPA TEt>f.JISSIMA C:=J MARATHCt,llfET\IFif t':.:':.:. :I ARTIFICIAL Mf RJTTfNC, c.REEN ~ rJl!J!llJllilj DECGt1POSED CiRANITE STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD 5TANDARO STANDARD M STANDARD STANDARD STANDARD STANDAFcO STANDARD SPACED• 4"' O.C. 1.. TRAINED TO ""'"" ENCLOSURE WAL L BLDG<A3 INDEPENDENT LIVING 4 STORIES OVER PARTIAL PARKING GARAGE ATLAS FESCUE BLUE OAT5 GR.A&& ME><!CAN FEATMER GRA 55 SODDED TUFi!F ARTIFICIAi. TIJFi!F - 5CREENl!'i4 l?HB-IBS 1-ETE~ESARellTIFOLIA LEIX:()Ft.lTU.ll1 F. 'C,f;£EN CLOD' u.ESTRINCilAF. UITNTAaelE CiB1' MASfllN4 SHBYBS LEUCOf'MTLLlM F. 'Cifi!EEN ClCU)' u.ESTRIN6IA F. urrNT AaBIE "6'1' TOTON &GAL. Gfi!EEN CLOUD SAGE & GAL. COAST ROSEMART Gfi!EEN CLOUD SA6E S GAL. COA5T R05EHART 5 GAL. ARCT05T~YLOS 'B"ERALD CARPET' MANZANITA I GAL. R05MARlt-AJS 0. 'PROSTATUS' TEUCRlll1 FRIJTICANS SAL VIA SPECIES CAE!,ALPINIA MEXICANA DAL.EA c.tQEGCill BACCMARIS PILULARIS SAL.VIA AP/ANA ENCELIA CALlfORNICA ERIOGOtU1 FA5CIOJLAT\J1 ACC ENT SHBYBS SALVIA Cifi<EOOII CISl\lS R.IRFUf<f:US CISlUS 'SI.NSET' PERE NN IAL SHRUBS CORfOP51S 'TEOJILA St.NRISE' KNIPHCflA WARIA BACCHARI!> CENTEM-IIAI. TRAILING ROSEMARY 1 GAL. 6U&M GEl-!NANDER 5 GAL. &A6E 5 GAL. MEXIC~ 61~ U- PARADlfJE & GAL. SEJflA ARTEMIS!OlDES FEATHERY CA&S1A & GAL. CEANOTI-llS 6.H. 'TAH<EE POINT' LILAC I GAL. C!SlUS R.R"UREUS ORD-IID ~ 1 GAL. Cl&lUS '61.N&ET' R0CKR0SE 1 GAL. TRAILN::slNDICiO QPEN SPACE TBANSIJIQN NATIVE SHRUBS 1-ETEROMELES ARBl/TIFOLIA TOYON COYOTE BU&M lU-lllE SA6E CAL.FOf;,,IJABRITTLE BUSI-I CALFOf.:t-llA~At NCN &GAL. IC.AL. S GAi.. IGAL. 1 GAL. 5 GAL, !GAi.. & GAL. IGAL. IGAL. !GAL. RED HOT POKER I GAL. g5~,-,.iIAL COYOTE I GAL. Sl OPE ALON(, &AN CHQ YISTA RP AR PLANTINC:i ALONCi Tl-llS AflcEA TO BE I-ITDRO SEEDED UJ!TH NATlYf SPECIES. BLDGA5 ASSISTED LIVING 4 STORIES s,• O.C. I.. 5' oc. L S' O.C '!>' O.C. &' o.c. .3'0,C 1..' 3' oc. 4' O.C. .30' O.C. &' O.C. -4'0.C. 3' O.C. 3' O.C. ,. oc. .3' oc 5' O.C. .3' oc. 4' O.C. b'O.C. 4' o.c. '"' oc 3' O.C. 3' O.C. 2-4'0.C. 24' o.c. 24.'0.C. TO BE SELECTED 1 GAL 6101?> GAL SITE L l GAL 61015 GAL 6ITE L I GAi. 6I0~ C:,AL 5ITE L 50D I2,824SF. 4,510 &F. COLOR TO REPLICATE • &uRROIJNDINC,, NATURAL l<OCK F0!0"1 5 1.~112) SF. I I i-• ¢, I I M W/6't10W ~Re A& eoRD ER I I / 3' THICK LAYER OYER FILTER FABRIC W/ 6' MOW OJRe A& BORDER I&' T0.36' DIA. BURT 113 INTO COMPACTED SU~·GRADE Preliminary Planting Plan f\11\ ~ hourlan associates,inc. landscape architecture + design 107 avenida miramar . suite d san clcmcnte , catifornia 92672 p: 949.489-5623 efex: 877.271.3122 e: team@hourianassociates com >- I- z :J ~ ~ 0 wQ < QN au Ck: e; (X) <(N~ f-0-0 <I) ' <Ca -<(O >u~ 0 ,J, .....J I<( 1/J .....JZ U--'<>- z::::, .. <uz a,:WO.. >> 1/J~< NW '° f- C') Q.....J .....J~ wo u_- zZ _w ...JC/) ISSUED FOR: ~ DATE: DMLOPMENT PLAN 05.30.17 KEY PlAN PROJECT NORTH PRELIMINARY PLANTING PLAN ,-.40·-o- CITY OF TEMECULA Pl.Af'f\11NG DEPARTMENT SCALE CONOITIONALL V ! su~~~,~2E~~Q~V~~~~: i APPIIOVEO MOOIFIC TION. EOUI l!C APPROVAL. SC .C OJte 9/5/2017 DRAWING NUMBER /5 ~ 0: z 5 a. g :, a. '3 ~ Q APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885 HELICTO TRICHON SEMPER VIRENS C 1-f 0 v I S r -"I MIXTURE OF SALVIA GREGGH & CISTU S 'SUNSET' 0 -"I 0 PLATNUS RACEMOSA CERCIS OCCIDENTAILLIS Plan View Enlargement WQMP Basin: 1"=10'-0" R/W CERCI& OCC!DENTALI& /M15CANT'-'U5 $1NEN515 ' . !\'~ _:_i.:.:'!_\<;,, ~.;$:\I/ \ '.\• Section G-G'/WQMP BASIN: ;t"=1'-0" TOF OF SLOFE BEYOND HEUCTO TRJCHON SEMPER VlRENS PLATNUS RACEMOSA LAGERSTR O[MlA INDICA LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA POPULUS FR EMONTII RANC...iO VISTA ROAD hourlan ossoclotes.lnc, landscape orchileclure + design 107 avenida miramar , suite d sari clementc , california 92672 p: 949.489-5623 efax: 877.271.3122 e· tcam@hou,iariassociates.com >- I- z ::) ~ ~ 0 wQ <( QN l?u a.: S; 00 <(N- t-- 0-0 V) ' <((j -<(O >ut1 0 -J, _J I <(lll ....J Z U-'o- z :J .. <l'.uz c.:wa.. >> lll~<( NW --Ot-- ;;; Q....l _J a:::: wo LL - zZ _w _J (/) ISSUED fOR: ~DATE: DEVELOPMENT PLAN D:>.J0.17 KEY PLAN PROJECT NORTH ENLARGEMENTS AND SECTION PLAN CITY OF TEMECULA PI.Atf\llNG DEPARTMENT SCAl.[ 1 ~ CONDITIONALLY w~m,oJ:~~OB~I;;:!;!::: Al'PR0\-1::D MOOl~i!t~fl~f:TYAPl'ftOVAL scott.cooper g/S/201J DRAWING NUMBER APN,#955-020-018 PA15-1885 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0930, THE FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA15-1885) FOR AN INDEPENDENT LIVING, ASSISTED LIVING, AND MEMORY CARE COMMUNITY LOCATED AT 31625 RANCHO VISTA ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On September 5, 2017, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted a Mitigated Negative Declaration, approved a Planned Development Overlay Amendment (PA15- 1886) and a Development Plan (PA15-1885) B. On August 4, 2020, Generations LLC filed Planning Application No. PA20-0930, an Extension of Time in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. D. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 21, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. E. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA20-0930, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project is in conformance with the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type of development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Extension of Time for a Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. The Planned Development Overlay Amendment and Development Plan were approved in 2017. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and adopted on September 5, 2017 by the City Council as Resolution No. 17-64. The project applicant is seeking an extension of time for the previously approved development plan. The applicant is not proposing any revisions to the project approvals. Staff has reviewed the MND and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a Subsequent Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous MND due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous MND was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the MND; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown i n the MND; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the MND would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The proposed project meets all requirements and mitigation contained in MND. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-0930, the first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road, and makes a finding of exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of October, 2020. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of October, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA FINAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20-0930 The first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 955-020-018 N/A (no grading) MSHCP Category: N/A (no new square footage) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (no new square footage) N/A (no new square footage) October 21, 2020 September 5, 2021 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not within Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 1. Expiration. This approval shall be used by September 5, 2021; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the one year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 2. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to four (4) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 5. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 6. Previous Conditions of Approval. All previous Conditions of Approval from PA15-1885 shall remain in full effect unless superseded herein. 7. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 8. FIRE PREVENTION Extension of Time Requirements. Having valid conditions in place, and appearing that no changes are being made that affect life safety all conditions previously placed on the project, and all codes and regulation in affect at the time of building permit application will be in full force and effect. 9. Life Safety Standards. The project will of course be subject to the applicable fire and life safety standards in place in the law at the time building and related permits are issued. 10. October 22, 2020 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Planning Application No. PA20-0930, the first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00, for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 35-day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (2) Self-addressed stamped envelope [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Generations @ Linfield Extension of Time (PA20-0930) Description of Project: The first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15-1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community Project Location: 31625 Rancho Vista Road Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula, County of Riverside The Planning Commission approved the above described project on October 21, 2020 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number) Categorical Exemption: (Section Number) Other: Section 15162 Categorical Exemption Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: The Planned Development Overlay Amendment and Development Plan were approved in 2017. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was prepared and adopted on September 5, 2017 by the City Council as Resolution No. 17-64 including the impacts and mitigation measures identified therein. Staff has reviewed the MND and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a Subsequent Environmental Impact Report or Mitigated Negative Declaration as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Contact Person/Title: Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 Signature: Date: Luke Watson Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA20-0930 APPLICANT: Aaron Walker PROPOSAL: The first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA15- 1885) for an independent living, assisted living, and memory care community located at 31625 Rancho Vista Road ENVIRONMENTAL: A mitigated negative declaration for the project was adopted on September 5, 2017 by the Temecula City Council. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff has determined the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review as none of the conditions requiring the preparation of a subsequent mitigated negative declaration have been triggered, and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such act ion or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting. Questions? Please call the Case Planner Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. Item No. 3 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2020 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, and two non- residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Wingsweep Corporation General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353 which allowed for the subdividing of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch including Planning Area 10. This tentative tract map expired. On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which updated the development standards and facilities within the sports park, provided a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allowed for age-qualified housing, added design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revised the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improved trails and trail connections, updated the landscape architecture master 2 plan, and revised the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for the communi ty while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation submitted Planning Application PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map 37925 for the creation of 13 single-family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Per the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, this Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) is Planning Area 10 which allows for Low Estate Density Residential development with a maximum of 14 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.7 dwelling units/acre. The TTM proposes 13 residential lots with an average lot size of 12,064 square feet and a minimum lot size of 11,495 square feet and 1.6 dwelling units/acre. The TTM also includes two non-residential lots that are used for open space, landscaping, and water quality. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on October 8, 2020 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the 3 EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 13 residential lots, two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II, the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 10 allows for a maximum of 14 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.7 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 13 residential lots with an average lot size of 12,064 square feet and a minimum lot size of 11,495 square feet and 1.6 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes two non-residential lots that will be used for open space, landscaping, and water quality. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. 4 The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identifi ed within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots and water basin will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). 5 The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing BUTTERFIELDSTAGERDRORIPAUGHV A LLEYRD COUNTRY VIEW RD SWEETWATER CIR FIESTARANCHRDMURRIETAHOTSPRINGSRD Project Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-0567 0 400 800200 Feet\Date Created: 9/16/2020 1:4,8001 inch = 400 feet 964-460-007 The map PA20-0567.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis X 1514.7 SECTION LINE EXISTING BIKE LANE CLASS II CURBBIKE LANE CLASS II CURB 1 2 3 (SF) AREA NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOT USE MAINTAINED BY 14 15 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 PROPOSED EASEMENT TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTION WQ+HMP BASIN LANDSCAPE LOT A STREET 11,929 30 0 30 60 SCALE: 1" = 30' CL 5'2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2%2% 2% MAX 2% MAX 20' EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ 5' 25'25' 20' 50' PARKING 8' PARKING 8' LOT 11,978 12,000 12,089 12,053 11,654 12,427 12,683 11,495 11,707 12,069 12,366 12,383 18,488 44,944 HOA HOA HOA MODIFIED LOCAL STREET (PRIVATE) 133,422 37925 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ENGINEER VICINITY MAP 215 SITE T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 20 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 21 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 22 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 28 N.T.S 79 DR SG NIRPS TOH ATEIRRUM DR SALOCIN YWKP SWODAEM DAOR EGAT S DLEIFRETTUBCA OAKS RD DR AT IRAGRAM EV A NOS R EFFEJ POURROY RD15 15 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73-85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37925 PL PL D R Z A ID D R DOOWET IHWDR HTIEK NOTNILC DR NOSPMOHT DR NOTNEB DR DLUA 1 CONTACT: JOSEPH GAUTHIER PHONE: (818) 838-0606 MISSION HILLS, CA 91345 SUITE 310 15535 SAN FERNANDO MISSION BLVD WINGSWEEP CORPORATION WINGSWEEP CORPORATION. PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE HELD IN FEE BY ALL EXISTING PARCELS INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP NOTE TRACT 37925, PA 10 TRACT 37925, PA 10 AREA (SF) 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 1 OF TRACT NO. 29353-2 4. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 13 5. NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS: 2 6. AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 12,064 SF 7. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 11,495 SF 8. MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR SP: 10,000 SF 9. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: SPI 13. TOTAL GROSS AREA: 8.12 ACRES 14. TOTAL NET AREA: 8.12 ACRES RAW FILL: 15,000 CY EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT: (951) 928-3777 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS: (800) 427-2200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON: (800) 892-2253 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: (800) 892-4357 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: SEWER 17. ALL WQMP FACILITIES TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. N.T.S. OWNER CONTACT: JOSH BARRETT, PE PHONE: (951) 782-0707 RIVERSIDE, CA. 92507 1770 IOWA AVE, SUITE 100 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS CLR/W 110' 86' 6'6'10'12'14'14'14'12'10'6'6' R/W S/W S/W MEDIAN LANDSCAPED RAISED 2:1 MAX 2:1 MAX 2:1 MA X 2:1 MAXWQ+HMP HYDROMODIFICATION MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY & 2%2% EXISTING MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD (PUBLIC) DENSITY (DU/AC):.....................................1.6 8.12 ACRES SUM OF TOTAL..............................353,687 SF SUM OF NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS....196,854 SF SUM OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS............156,833 SF 15. APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 16. UTILITY PURVEYORS: 11. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 12. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 2. EXISTING ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 964-460-007 3. EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: SP-11 10. SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: L-E PA20-0567 BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND ACCESS 1 EXISTING EASEMENT 2 QUITCLAIMED 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PER PR 00128177-996 TO BE OTHER PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED DEC 5, 1988 AS INST. NO FOR TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND 20' WIDE EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO GENERAL TELEPHONE RAW CUT: 15,000 CY N.T.S. STREET "A" DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm100.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 2020STREET "A" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910111213 WQ+HMP LOT 14 (LOT A)(LOT A)25'25'50'55'110'50' 25'25' MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD55'6.3 5'14 15 13 11 10 121110VALLEY ROADRORIPAUGHSTREET "A" APN 964-460-007 12 OPEN SPACE LOT 15 R=105 ' L=257.47'R=45'32.53' CV '05 41.04'R=105' R=65'R=109' TR 37925 R=300'L=34.22'74'74' 72' 70' 70' 73'172'173'173'70'70'36'34'70'70'42' 41'52' 6' 81' 33' 48' 24'70'19'53'72'11' 1 6' 4 1' 19'114'26'39'31'21'37' 34'37'96'35'72' 61'151'170'172'173'171'170'158'69'89' 59'70'70'69'68'68'75' 31' 46 '23'6'67' 660.51'447.00'R=2945.00'L=804.69' |=15 39'19"574.27'30' OPEN SPACE LOT 15 OPEN SPACE LOT 15 OPEN SPACELOT 152 2 168'173'167'161'65' 65' 65'138'39'65'60'60'18'216.35' N87°10'31"E N08°37'44"E105.87'2 = R 9 4 5 .0 '0 | = 1 ' 1 3 1 4 "4' 6 2 .7 L = R=3000' | = 4° 55' 3"| = 6° 32' 11"R=3000'L=819.71' | = 15° 39' 19"N13°17'11"E235.65'R=275'R=325'N32°20'06"WN01°40'16"WS00°44'05"WS02°49'29"EN00°40'05"E1 1 1 S00°34'31"WN02°49'29"WZONING: SP-11L/U: OS1NOT A PART APN 964-460-016ZONING: SP-11L/U: OS1NOT A PART APN 964-460-001ZONING: SP-11 L/U: OS1 NOT A PART APN 964-460-016 X 1514.7 X X XXX X X X X 1320 X X X 1325 X 13 3 0 PBXX XXX 1335 X 13401340 134013401340 134513451345XPBXPBXPBX 135013501350 13501350X XX XPBXX XXX 13551355 13551355X X X XX XX X1360136013601360 1360 13601360 X1365 13 6 5 13651365 1365 1365 13651365 1365 X X MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS RD 1370 1370 1370 137013701375 1375 DRAINAGE DITCH PROPOSED 3' GROUND PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LINE SECTION LINE EXISTING PROPOSED FH PROPOSED FH 3' DRAINAGE DITCH EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND RETAINING WALL 3' MAX. RETAINING WALL 3' MAX. EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND PROPOSED GROUND FENCE HABITAT PROPOSED FENCE HABITAT PROPOSED FENCE HABITAT PROPOSED FENCE HABITAT PROPOSED TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 1369.63 FL 1367.87 FL 1362.72 FL 1364.19 FL TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 1361.58 FL/LP 1368.40 FS1365.1 FS 1370.2 FS (1356.00 FS) EXIST. 8" SEWER EXIST. 18" SD EXIST. 18" SD EXIST. FIRE HYDRANT PROPOSED 12" SD LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE PROPOSED 18" SD CATCH BASIN PROPOSED PROPOSED 24" SD CATCH BASIN PROPOSED EXIST. CB WATER EXIST. 12" HABITAT FENCE PROPOSED HABITAT FENCE PROPOSED HABITAT FENCE PROPOSED FENCE HABITAT PROPOSED 1. 30 0 30 60 SCALE: 1" = 30'C2E 2 D 2 F2TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTION CROSS SECTION N.T.S. SOUTH BOUNDARYF 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. ADJACENT LOTSD 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. EAST BOUNDARYE 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NORTH BOUNDARYC 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. WEST BOUNDARYA 2 PL PL PL PL STREET A 2:1 2:1 SPRINGS ROAD MURRIETA HOT MAX2:1 MAX 2:1 2.5'MA X 2:12:1SETBACK SIDE YARD 10' MIN. SETBACK SIDE YARD RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73-85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 1 OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37925 1372.7 LOT 8 2:1 37925 EXHIBIT "A" TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2 9. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 50% 8. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 2 STORIES, 35 FEET 8. MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 20 FT 7. MINIMUM INTERIOR YARD SETBACK: 10 FT 6. MINIMUM CORNER YARD SETBACK: 15 FT -SIDE ENTRY GARAGE: 10 FT -FRONT ENTRY GARAGE: 18 FT 5. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK: 20 FT 4. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 80 FT 3. MINIMUM WIDTH AT SETBACK: 50 FT 2. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT FLAG: 20 FT 1. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT PL: 25 FT B 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. WEST BOUNDARYB 2 PL 10' SETBACK SIDEYARD BOUNDARY W'LY TRACT BOUNDARY W'LY TRACT 65' 1368.2 PE LOT 1 20' SETBACK FUEL MOD 80' MIN. FUEL MOD ZONE 34' TO 23 ** FUEL MOD ZONE 2 * FUEL MOD ZONE 1 NOTE: BOUNDARY N'LY TRACT PL 20' SETBACK FUEL MOD 87' FUEL MOD SETBACK BOUNDARY E'LY TRACT ** FUEL MOD ZONE 2 * FUEL MOD ZONE 1 NOTE: BOUNDARY W'LY TRACT 20'VARIES 58' TO 138' MANAGEMENT PLAN, DATED APRIL 28, 2020 WATER QUALITY & HYDROMODIFICATION 1362 FG TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 15' MIN. TRAIL SOIL FIRE ACCESS 15' MIN. NATIVE TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 15' MIN. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS REQUIREMENTS (M2) SPA LOT DESIGNATION LEGEND 10' MIN. ABBREVIATIONS WQ+HMP MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY & HYDROMODIFICATION FHFIRE HYDRANT SDSTORM DRAIN FSFINISHED SURFACE TOP DAYLIGHT LINE 2:1 SLOPE BOT TOP OF BASIN BOTTOM OF BASIN A 2 SETBACK REAR ** FUEL MOD ZONE 2 * FUEL MOD ZONE 1 NOTE: VARIES* 54' TO 75'12' TO 33' VARIES** VARIES** 27' TO 29' VARIES* 36' TO 38' VARIES** 46' TO 57' VARIES* LOT 5 LOT 8 LOT 9 LOT 11 PA20-0567 1371.9 1372.7 1368.2 1370.6 LOT 15 65' LOT 15 LOT 15 LOT 15 TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 15' MIN. PUE PROP. MIN. 60' LOT 15 PROPOSED EASEMENT BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND ACCESS 1 EXISTING EASEMENT 2 QUITCLAIMED 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PER PR 00128177-996 TO BE OTHER PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED DEC 5, 1988 AS INST. NO FOR TRANSMISSION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND 20' WIDE EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO GENERAL TELEPHONE DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm101.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 2020STREET "A" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8910111213 WQ+HMP LOT 14 (LOT A)(LOT A)25'25'50'55'110'50' 25'25' MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD55'6.3 5' 1.0% 14 15 13 11 10 121110VALLEY ROADRORIPAUGHSTREET "A" APN 964-460-007 12 OPEN SPACE LOT 15 1369.2 1369.9 1370.6 1371.2 1371.9 1372.7 1372.81371.81371.11370.41369.61368.91368.2 R=105 'R=45'CV '05 41.04'R=105' R=65'R=109' TR 37925 15' MIN 74'74' 72' 70' 70' 73'172'173'173'70'70'36'34'70'70'42' 41'52' 6' 81' 33' 48' 24'70'19'53'72'11' 1 6' 4 1' 19'114'26'39'31'21'37' 34'37'96'35'72' 61'151'170'172'173'171'170'158'69'89' 59'70'70'69'68'68'75' 31' 46 '23'6'67'15' MIN15' MIN 15' MIN30' OPEN SPACE LOT 15 OPEN SPACE LOT 15 OPEN SPACELOT 15168'173'167'161'65' 65' 65'138'2:1 3:1 39'2:12:12:12:12:12:12:12:12:12:1 2:1 3:1 3:1 3:13:13:13:1 65'60'60'3 :1 4:1 4:1 2:13:13:15:14:12' BENCH 18'1354.8 BOT 1360.3 TOP2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)R=275'R=325'3.9%ZONING: SP-11L/U: OS1NOT A PART APN 964-460-016ZONING: SP-11L/U: OS1NOT A PART APN 964-460-001ZONING: SP-11 L/U: OS1 NOT A PART APN 964-460-016 135513551355135513601 3 6 0 136013601 3 6 0 1360 1365 13651365 1365 1365 13651365136513651 3 6 5 1369 1370 13701370 13701370 1370 1370 137013701370 1373 1372 1372 1371 1371 1371 1372 1372 1373 1369 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0567, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37925) FOR THE CREATION OF 13 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, TWO NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS (ONE OPEN SPACE LOT, AND ONE LOT THAT WILL BE USED AS A WATER QUALITY BASIN) ON 8.12 ACRES FOR PLANNING AREA 10 OF RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map Application (TTM 37925) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 21, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA20-0567, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II, the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Maps. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 10 allows for a maximum of 14 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.7 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 13 residential lots with an average lot size of 12,064 square feet and a minimum lot size of 11,495 square feet and 1.6 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes two non-residential lots that will be used for open space, landscaping, and water quality. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are subst antially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots and water basin will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Tract Map A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and the Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 13 residential lots, two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the proposed project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of October, 2020. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof hel d on the 21st day of October, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20-0567 A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-460-007 Less than 8.0 dwelling units MSHCP Category: Residential-Detached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Single Family Single Family with Attached Garage October 21, 2020 October 21, 2023 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project Not Located in the Uptown Specific Plan Area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP #11). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti graffiti coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved tentative maps contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 11. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 12. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in the Development Agreement. 13. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 14. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 15. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 16. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 17. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 18. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 19. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 20. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 21. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 22. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 23. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 24. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 25. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, this project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 26. Development Impact Fee (DIF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, the developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all City resolutions by paying the appropriate DIF fee. 27. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 28. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 29. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 30. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), and the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 31. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 32. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 33. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 34. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 35. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 36. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans and/or erosion control to satisfaction of the City Engineer shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 37. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 38. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view pursuant to public agency requirements. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 39. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 40. Performance Securities. For common areas, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 41. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 42. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 43. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All conditions 1 thru 46 shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 44. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 45. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 46. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 47. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement pursuant to the Development Agreement through the payment of in lieu fees equivalent to a determined amount of acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 48. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR), (SCH# 97121030), was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. 49. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, inc luding parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the course of the review. 50. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 51. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and expense. 52. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 53. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality Management Plan. 54. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 55. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 56. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 57. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 58. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 59. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 60. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant’s signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. (TTM 37925) require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. _____________________ Luke Watson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: _____________________ Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 61. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article ___ CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA ____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. ____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. ____3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the more restrictive provision shall prevail, as long as such provision complies with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. The CC&Rs shall include a provision requiring compliance with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. ____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. 62. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 63. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 64. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 65. Outside Agencies Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated August 19, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 66. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geocon West, Inc transmittal dated June 24, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 67. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 68. Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, and/or (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 69. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 70. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 71. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 72. Implementing facilities. The Developer shall ensure the following: a. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, ultimate improvements to provide vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan. b. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional rights of way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the City Engineer. c. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. d. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Drainage Study and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works. e. All areas within the limits of work must be designed to address Water Quality and designated as self treating areas, self retaining areas, areas draining to self retaining areas, or areas draining to BMPs. 73. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 74. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 75. Landscaped Plans. The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards. b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped parkways, medians or public parks until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility. 76. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 77. Access restriction. The future access onto public streets shall be restricted as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 78. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 79. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 80. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 81. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 82. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. General Telephone; b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; c. Rancho California Water District; d. Eastern Municipal Water District; e. Cable TV Franchise; f. Telephone Company; g. Southern California Edison Company; h. The Gas Company; i. Metropolitan Water District or other affected agencies 83. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Murrieta Hot Springs Road on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 84. Easements. Note the following: a. A 50 foot wide easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 85. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements (including parkways) to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve Murrieta Hot Springs (Principal Arterial (6 lanes divided) Standard No. 100 –110’ R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 86. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve Street "A" (Private Street – 50’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. b. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. c. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). d. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 87. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 88. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 89. Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract or Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer (at developer’s cost). The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 90. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. 91. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 92. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 93. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. General Telephone; or other affected agencies. 94. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 95. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 96. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 97. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 98. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 99. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 100. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 101. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 102. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 103. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map Number 37925 shall be approved and recorded. 104. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 105. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 106. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 107. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 108. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 109. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 110. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 111. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 112. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 113. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 114. Fire Requirement. Water will need to be in and hydrants will need to be active. Also, roads will need to be installed with asphalt before combustible materials can be brought onto the site. 115. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 116. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for tract home developments with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 117. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 118. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of plans and calculations are required for each individual home, not model type. 119. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@DC0E3F22\@BCL@DC0E3F22.doc October 22, 2020 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA20-0567, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (3) Self addressed stamped envelopes (2) [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov PA19-0408 @BCL@DC0E3F22 City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 97121030 Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37925 (PA20-0567) Project Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-007 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 21, 2020 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and the five Addendums to the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses, and the five Addendums to the EIR are available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: PA19-0408 @BCL@DC0E3F22 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Wingsweep Corporation Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37925 (PA20-0567) Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-007 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 13 residential lots, two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. PA19-0408 @BCL@DC0E3F22 Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Director of Community Development Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA20-0567 APPLICANT: Wingsweep Corporation PROPOSAL: A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37925) for the creation of 13 single family lots, 1 open space lot, and a water quality basin on 8.12 acres for Planning Area 10 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via t ext and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting. Questions? Please call the Case Planner Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. Item No. 4 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2020 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-0568, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 3 non-residential lots (2 open space lots, and a water quality basin) on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Wingsweep Corporation General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353, which allowed for the subdividing of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch including Planning Area 12. This tentative tract map expired. On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a Ge neral Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which included an update to the development standards and facilities within the sports park, provided a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allowed for age-qualified housing, added design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revised the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improved trails and trail connections, updated the landscape architecture master plan, and revised the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for 2 the community while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation submitted Planning Application PA20-0568, a Tentative Tract Map 37926 for the creation of 104 single-family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Per the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, this Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) is Planning Area 12, which allows for Medium Density Residential development with a maximum of 136 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet and allowable density of 8.3 dwelling units/acre. The TTM proposes 104 residential lots with an average lot size of 4,579 square feet and a minimum lot size of 3,075 square feet and 6.5 dwelling units/acre. The TTM also includes three non-residential lots that will be used for open space and a water quality basin. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on October 8, 2020 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch Addendum and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would 3 in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 104 single family residential lots, two open space lots, and a water quality basin is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda to the EIR. FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II, the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 136 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet and allowable density of 8.3 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 104 residential lots with an average lot size of 4,579 square feet and a minimum lot size of 3,075 square feet and 6.5 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes three non-residential lots (two open space lots and one that will be used as a water quality basin). As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. 4 The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable bui lding, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements, which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public, will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots. open space lots, and water basin will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. 5 ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing BUTTERFIELDSTAGERDRORIPAUGHV A LLEYRD NICO LAS RD SWEETWATER CIR FIESTARANCHRDD A W N INGRIDG E CAMINO CIELO J E S S I E CI RCANTRELL RDSOMMERS BEND DYMONDIA W AY MURRIETAHOTSPRINGSRD Project Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-0568 0 400 800200 Feet\Date Created: 9/16/2020 1:4,8001 inch = 400 feet 964-460-009 The map PA20-0568.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis X 1514.7 DENSITY (DU/AC) LOT #(SF) AREA (SF) AREA LOT # NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOT USE MAINTAINED BY 6.5 HOA HOA STREET STREET STREET 5. NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS: 2 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT: (951) 928-3777 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS: (800) 427-2200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON: (800) 892-2253 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: (800) 892-4357 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: SEWER 17. ALL WQMP FACILITIES TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. 60 0 60 SCALE: 1" = 60' 120 TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTION LINE TABLE NAME DIRECTION LENGTH ---- ---------------- --------- L3 N 86°46'09" E 22.68' L5 N 22°54'37" E 31.87' HOA HOA HOA WQ BASIN 4. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 104 CURVE TABLE NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC ---- ----------- --------- -------- 8. MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR SP: 3,000 SF 13. TOTAL GROSS AREA: 16.01 ACRES 14. TOTAL NET AREA: 16.01 ACRES 37926 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP O/S STREET STREET STREET HOA HOA HOA STREET HOA 10. SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: M2 ENGINEER VICINITY MAP 215 SITE T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 20 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 21 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 22 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 28 N.T.S DR HTIEK NOTNILC DR NOSPMOHT DR NOTNEB DR DLUA 79 DR YORRUOP DR SALOCIN DR ATIRAGRAM YWKP SWOD AEM DR EGAT S DLEIFR ETTUBDR DO OWETIHW EVA NOSREFFEJ DR ZAID 15 15 OAKS RD CA DR S GNIRPS T OH ATE IRRUM 1 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 4 OF TRACT NO. 29353-2 9. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: SPI 3. EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: SP-11 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73-85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 4 OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37926 C2 L6 8°26'30"1055.00'155.44' 129.88'C3 22°20'49"33.00' C4 39°42'03"185.01'267.00' MODIFIED LOCAL STREET (PRIVATE)2:1 MAX2:1 MAXPL 5' 25' 50' 20' EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ 5' 25' 20' PL 477652 404351 3822 50 3941 49 4379 48 4359 47 4378 46 3998 45 4000 44 3637 43 4130 42 4110 41 488940 7110 39 7255 38 467637 323336 344535 324834 307533 3075 32 3075 31 3124 30 330029 3300 28 3300 27 3300 26 3335 25 3389 24 3389 23 3416 22 330021 3375 20 3505 19 370118 3692 17 339016 6076 15 8995 14 5117 13 3548 12 401811 540010 4698 9 49728 44927 43266 41635 42974 39813 62172 82771 4698104 3901103 3614102 3608101 3608100 360399 350898 338197 336296 392295 455594 399593 386792 453391 367990 350889 421488 626787 453786 380485 392984 356783 356782 356781 356780 351979 410678 752377 505176 471275 436574 6186 73 4506 72 419271 388270 3461 69 3545 68 4130 67 485466 5624 65 600564 9745 63 4358 62 330061 3628 60 337059 3403 58 4000 57 4087 56 3187 55 4222 54 643753 4657LOT H 5319LOT G 49573LOT F 24665LOT E 43647LOT D 29984LOT C 5649LOT B WINGSWEEP CORPORATION. PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE HELD IN FEE BY ALL EXISTING PARCELS INCLUDED WITHIN THE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP NOTE PROPOSED EASEMENTS TRACT 37928, PA 12 TRACT 37928, PA 12 MEDIAN LANDSCAPED 2%2%2% 14' CL 12'12'17'12'12'17' 2% 6'10' 8' N.T.S. 96' 122' S/W 6. AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 4,579 SF 7. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 3,075 SF RAW FILL: 32,000 CY RAW CUT: 32,000 CY 15. APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 6 4 CONTACT: JOSH BARRETT, PE PHONE: (951) 782-0707 RIVERSIDE, CA. 92507 1770 IOWA AVE, SUITE 100 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY 5 OWNER LEGEND EXISTING BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD (PUBLIC) AREA (SF) CONTACT: JOSEPH GAUTHIER PHONE: (818) 838-0606 MISSION HILLS, CA 91345 SUITE 310 15535 SAN FERNANDO MISSION BLVD WINGSWEEP CORPORATION 2%2%2% CL 10'12' 2% 44' 66' 5' S/W 6'5' LANE BIKE 5' LANE BIKE 12'5' S/W 6' 11'11' N.T.S. 2%2%2% 10'12' 44' 66' 5' LANE BIKE 5' LANE BIKE 12'5' S/W 6' 11'11' N.T.S. CL 2% 5' S/W 6' 2' BENCH 2' BENCH L/S2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX138.98' EXISTING FIESTA RANCH ROAD (PUBLIC) EXISTING RORIPAUGH VALLEY ROAD (PUBLIC)2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2:1 MAXEASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ CL PARKING 8' 2%2% 8' PARKING 2:1 MAX2:1 MAXR/WR/W R/W R/W R/W R/W 11. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 12. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 16. UTILITY PURVEYORS: 2. EXISTING ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 964-460-009 C5 300.00'4°28'35"23.44' C6 300.26'L7 23.05' L1 N 82°19'20" E 32.31' L2 N 26°39'46" W 25.98' L4 N 34°14'15" W 27.63' 39.17'7°28'54" PA20-0568 L8 34.91' BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND ACCESS REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 EXISTING EASEMENTS 1 2 3' WIDE EASEMENT FOR CROSSLOT DRAINAGE, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, AND HOA MAINTENANCE ACCESS 3 O/S HOA 32911107 24780106 30380105 L9 L10 20.30' 18.34' AS INST NO. 85004 O.R. PER PR 00128181-996 APPROX PER DESC. TO BE QUITCLAIMED. 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO SCE FOR UTILITY PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED MAR. 31,1988 AS INST NO. 92226 O.R. PER PR 00128181-996 APPROX PER DESC. TO BE QUITCLAIMED. 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO SCE FOR UTILITY PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED APR. 7,1988 TO BE QUITCLAIMED. DEC 5, 1988 AS INST. NO 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PER PR 00128181-996 OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND OTHER PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED 20' WIDE EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO GENERAL TELEPHONE FOR TRANSMISSION 20' WIDE EASEMENT FOR EMWD UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES N.T.S. STREET "B"; "C"; "D"; "E"; "F"; "G"; "H" ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: L NOT A PART APN 964-460-018 16.01 ACRES SUM OF TOTAL: 697,371 SF SUM OF NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 251,565 SF SUM OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 445,806 SF MAX 2% MAX 2% DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm200.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 20202 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 56 76 75 74 73 77 57 58 59 60 63 64 65 9 8 76 66 55 53 78 61 62 67 68 69 70 71 72 100 101 102 103 104 34 35 37 39 36 38 RORIPAUGH VALLEY ROAD STREET "D"FIESTA RANCH ROAD NI COLAS ROAD BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD STREET "F"STREET "E"STREET "C"L=573.76'21°25'50"R=1534.00'=|638.97'L1 377.97' 7 3 . 8 3' C1 L 2 6 5 9 .0 5 'LOT 105 (LOT F) (LOT H)(LOT B)(L OT G)(LOT D)S T R E E T "G"STREET "B"STREET "H" APN 964-460-009 BASIN WQ+HMP L1 OPEN SPACE LOT 106 6 2 0'66'33'33'33'33' 66'50'25'25' 25 '25' 50 ' 50 ' 25 '25' 25' 25'50' 1 '60. 982=L LOT 106 OPEN SPACE78'77'75'75'75'75' 75'75'75'78' 102'"42'40°13=| '00.335=R L5L4 C2 L6 L3C3C4 LOT 106 OPEN SPACE76' 5 4 R=300'R=300'99'92'95'77'79'100'55'55'110'25'25'50'414.56'110.15'97.42'L=76.05'94.39'R=1000'L=158.54'L=40.46'136.50'|=1326'10"R=300.00'L=70.35'91.50'137.89'0R=010 .00' 9|=55'15" L=173.15'39.71'142.44'|=1431'32"|=905'02"257.41'|=0743'44"336.32'R=300.00' |=5028L=2 6 4 3 1' . ' 4 8 " 58.67'R=300.00|=3'L=2942'0073".87'108.00' 377.97' R=300.00 '|=11 40 " ' 33 L=60 .5 3'157.96'00|R=1600'L=65=2323'23.3.1"7'6 6 3 .5 7 'R=1600.|=2000'L=8'59.9 52"8 '219.28'100.36'|=2220'9"4R=300.00'L=117.01'638.97'C5L7C6 97.88'35'3 ' 2 ''46'122' 4 '4 ' 43'117' 1 '109' 29'52'3 1'26'84'29' 25'77'52' 14' 36 '51'35' 18' 106' 35' 46'35'131'21'21'78'47'79 '22'4'20'54'44'25'75'20'45'31'31'13'75'13'43'48'75'44'7 5'47'4 4 '4 7 '19'7 5'17' 27' 27'44' 44'7 5'44' 7 5'44'44' 7 5'44' 42' 41' 41' 41'41' 22'28 '7 5'18' 2 2'7'80'12' 8'34'36' 1 0 0' 36'35' 109' 89'10'50'44' 26'42'28'43'27' 27'28' 42'41'102''4'2'2'''35'24'54'33' 34'75'42'75'19'28'9'29' 55'36'27'26'32'77' 28'76' 4 '8'36'36'4'77' 33'75'13'75'44' 44'21'24'47'38'48'38'10' 18'53'128'45'139'45'3'7'46'118'8'35'1 0 5' 4 4 '10'32'9 1' 18' 24' 41' 7 9'42' 42' 41' 9 0' 41' 10 0'41' 2 9' 3 4' 28' 35' 10 5'48'93'119'29'45'14'102' 109'45'4'37'117'41'45' 41'51'46'25'26'51'30'41'85'9'41'87'12'29'87'41'87' 87'41'12'29'41'27'87'18''89'36'38'3'81'5'38'37'85'1' 27' 2 3'51' 40'32'31' 8 3'41' 41' 27' 8 8'2 8' 11' 55'19'31'4'42' 36'19'81'5' 5'83' 90''4'88' 78'41'81'33'41'84'8'41'87'12'88'41'88'29'41'12'29'88'12'88'41'10'34'32'90'55'46'13'37'5'41' 1' 98' 110' 21' 4 3'11'103'50'25'24'45'19' 44' 44' 42' 41' 41' 18'47'4 2 '111'66' 59' 90.76'=8|05'1 0 " R=300.0 0 'L42=.34 '157.88'88' 7 32'26'80'8L81 1 2 1 2 1 12'20' 3 94' 92' 91' 91' 95' 96' 110' 13 1'94'98'100'99'100'OPEN SPACE LOT 107 53.82' 14 0.7 3'N5 5° 3 5'3 9"WS52°17'22"E S48°20'51"ES44°12'12"EN45°47'48"E S53°15'19" E S61°17'18"ES 72°31'40"EN01°10'11"WN08°30'14"ES07°22'36"ES01°09'27"WS02°32'39"WS84°25'35"E S84°25'35"E S84°25'35"E N77°49'09"E S52°13'37"W S52°17'22"E N76°47'15"E S83°43'24"E S02°32'39"WS83°43'24"E S83°43 '24"E S87°30'03"E S87°27'21"ES70°16'33"EN06°47'19"WS07°22'36"EN00°06'18"ES83°43'24"E S61°17'18"ES53°20'14" E S52°17'22"E N83°12'42"E N83°11'30"E S89°53'42"E L9 L 10ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-014 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-013 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-015 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-011 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: NC NOT A PART APN 964-460-008 85' 89' 9 4 1' 1' 4 19'20'24 7 5 7'36'4'3 29'60'26'45' 40' 42'12'29'41' 43' 41' 11 '4 17177 6'76' 54'47'44'54'23'21'42'43'47'47'34'9203140'633'42'44'42'44'42'39'42'42'44'42'97' 93'20'21'2'43'6 561013'42'38'41' ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 EXIST PARK-N-RIDE/EQUESTRIAN STAGING AREA 8 (LOT C)(LOT E)14' X 1514.7 X X MHX 12 0 0 1200X X X X X 1205 120512051 2 0 5 X X X X X MHX X X X X XX X X X XPBXX MHX X X X X PB X X PBX X X 12101210 12 101210X PBX X MHX X MHX P BX MHX X P BX X XX X X X MHX P B X X P B X X MHX X X P BX X X PBX X X P B X X MHX P B X 12 12 X 1212X X X X PB X X X X X X XMHX X X XX X X X X X X X X X X XX P BX X X 1215 1215 1215 1215121512151215 P BX X X PBX X P BX MHX 1220 1220 1 2 2 0 1220122012201220122012 2 0 1220 X PBX PBXX X X X 12251225 12 2 5 12 2 5 12 25 12251225 1225 PBX X X X X XPBXX X 123012301230 1230123 012301230123012301230 1230 1230 XPBX X MHX X X X1235 123512351235 12 3 5 1235 12351235 1235 X XMHX X XX X X X X X X1240 1240124012401240 1240 1240 1240 1240 X X X X XX PBX X X X X X PBX12451245 124512 4 5 1245 X X X PBX XX PBX PB X X 1250 1250 12501250 1250 1250X MHX PB X PBX 1255 1255 1255 1255 XX 1260 1260 1260 PBX X MHX X 1265 1265 12651265PBX 1270 1270 1270 12 7 0 1270MHX X 1275 1275 1275 X X 1280 1280 1280 1280 MHX MHX 1285 EXIST FH EXIST FH EXIST FH FH EXIST FH EXIST FH EXIST FH EXIST FH EXIST EXIST. FH FH PROP. FH PROP. FH PROP. FH PROP. RELOCATED FH TO BE EXIST CB PROP. CB PROP. CB PROP. CB PROP. CB PROP. CB PROP. J-DITCH J-DITCH PROP. FH DRAIN EXIST TERRACE RELOCATED FHBASIN CATCH PROP 12" SD PROP SD PROP 12" SD PROP 24" SD PROP 24" DRAIN EXIST TERRACE PROP 18" SD LINE HINGE 30" SD BE UPSIZED TO EXIST 24" SD TO MONUMENT PROP COMMUNITY PROP. DITCH RETAINING WALL 3' MAX. EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND RETAINING WALL 5' MAX RETAINING WALL PROP. 5' MAX. EXIST. GROUND IRON FENCE WROUGHT PROP J-DITCH PROP SLOPE WALL 4' MAX. RETAINING RETAINING WALL PROP. 5' MAX. EXIST. GROUND IRON FENCE WROUGHT PROP J-DITCH PROP SLOPE 6' SOUND WALL 6' SOUND WALL 2% MAX 2% MAX MONUMENT WALL PROP COMMUNITY 60 0 60 SCALE: 1" = 60' 120 SPA LOT DESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS (M2) TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTIONF2H2D2 I 2 G2 A 2 C2 9. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 65% 8. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 2-1/2 STORIES, 35 FEET 8. MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 10 FT 7. MINIMUM INTERIOR YARD SETBACK: 5 FT 6. MINIMUM CORNER YARD SETBACK: 15 FT -SIDE ENTRY GARAGE: 10 FT -FRONT ENTRY GARAGE: 18 FT 5. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK: 10 FT 4. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 75 FT 3. MINIMUM WIDTH AT SETBACK: 40 FT 2. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT FLAG: 25 FT 1. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT PL: 25 FT PL2:1LOT 54 LOT 104 N.T.S F A 2:1C N.T.S N.T.S 2:1 E N.T.S R/W 2:1 STAGE ROAD BUTTERFIELD D PL G PL 2:1H PL I N.T.S VARIES OPEN SPACE LOT 106 2' BENCH 37926 EXHIBIT A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP VALLEY ROAD RORIPAUGH ROAD NICOLAS STREET E N.T.S 2: 1 N.T.S PL R/W PL B2B N.T.S R/W 2 WEST BOUNDARY NORTH BOUNDARY NORTH BOUNDARY 10' MIN. SETBACK REAR 10' MIN. SETBACK REAR 3' 10' MIN. SETBACK REAR EAST BOUNDARY SOUTH BOUNDARY ADJACENT LOTS 1232.2 1240.3 ADJACENT LOTS N.T.S 1228.9 LOT 73 LOT 69 1222.3 ADJACENT LOTS LOT 73 1228.9 LOT 70 1221.5 ADJACENT LOTS LOT 87 1217.9 LOT 88 1216.5 1. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73-85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 4 OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37926 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 2' BENCH 2:1 EXIST. SW 10' VARIES OPEN SPACE LOT 106 LEGEND 15' 5' 17' ABBREVIATIONS BOT BOTTOM OF BASIN FH FIRE HYDRANT FS FINISHED SURFACE SD STORM DRAIN TOP OF BASINTOP WQ+HMP MANAGEMENT PLAN HYDROMODIFICATION WATER QUALITY AND L/S LANDSCAPE S/W SIDEWALK EXIST.EXISTING PROP.PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LINE 2:1 SLOPE MANAGEMENT PLAN, DATED APRIL 28, 2020 WATER QUALITY & HYDROMODIFICATION E2 LOT 8 LOT 27 LOT 39 PA20-0568 1245.6 1221.2 1213.3 R/W VARIES 2:1 REAR SETBACK 10' TO 15' VARIES 2' BENCH LOT 48 1229.8 2:1 RANCH ROAD FIESTA PKWY 6.0' 46'-127'LOT 107 VARIES PL R/W VARIES 2:1 REAR SETBACK 10' TO 15' VARIES 2' BENCH LOT 3 1240.9 2:1 46'-127'LOT 107 VARIES PL VALLEY ROAD RORIPAUGH 2.8' 25'-42' VARIES ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: L NOT A PART APN 964-460-017 TR 37928 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: L NOT A PART APN 964-460-018 TR 37928 ECNATSID THGIS '0032' 2' PROPOSED EASEMENTS 6 4 5 BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES AND ACCESS EXISTING EASEMENTS 1 2 3' WIDE EASEMENT FOR CROSSLOT DRAINAGE, DRAINAGE FACILITIES, AND HOA MAINTENANCE ACCESS 3 AS INST NO. 85004 O.R. PER PR 00128181-996 APPROX PER DESC. TO BE QUITCLAIMED. 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO SCE FOR UTILITY PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED MAR. 31,1988 AS INST NO. 92226 O.R. PER PR 00128181-996 APPROX PER DESC. TO BE QUITCLAIMED. 10' WIDE EASEMENT TO SCE FOR UTILITY PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED APR. 7,1988 TO BE QUITCLAIMED. DEC 5, 1988 AS INST. NO 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PER PR 00128181-996 OF ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND OTHER PURPOSES PER INST RECORDED 20' WIDE EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO GENERAL TELEPHONE FOR TRANSMISSION 20' WIDE EASEMENT FOR EMWD UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE PURPOSES 6BENCH DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm201.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 20202 3 4 5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 56 76 75 74 73 77 57 58 59 60 63 64 65 9 8 76 66 55 53 78 61 62 67 68 69 70 71 72 100 101 102 103 104 34 35 37 39 36 38 (1.5%)(8.6%)(7.4%) (5.2%) (4.3%)(4.6%)(2 .0 %) 1204.2 BOT 1209.7 TOP RORIPAUGH VALLEY ROAD STREET "D"FIESTA RANCH ROAD NI COLAS ROAD BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD STREET "F"STREET "E"STREET "C" LOT 105 (LOT F) (LOT H)(LOT B)(L OT G)(LOT D)(1212.5 FG) (1213.7 FG) (1215.4 FG) (1274.5 FG) (1281.0 FG) (1270.9 FG) (1264.4 FG) (1256.2 FG) (1250.7 FG) (1247.1 FG) (1245.3 FG) (1223.0 FG) (1217.8 FG) (1214.1 FG) (1212.5 FG) (1212.0 FG) (1214.8 FG) (1239.6 FG) S T R E E T "G"STREET "B"STREET "H" (1221.7 FG) APN 964-460-009 OPEN SPACE LOT 106 1247.1 1246.7 1245.8 1245.5 1245.0 1242.8 1239.9 1236.6 1234.0 1232.0 1230.0 1227.2 1225.1 1224.2 1222.1 1219.1 1218.2 1217.0 1214.0 1240.3 1241.5 1242.1 1245.1 1245.3 1246.7 1247.3 1248.2 1247.3 1233.1 1228.4 1227.4 1224.3 1222.3 1221.5 1219.5 1218.9 1225.4 1216.5 1216.8 1215.2 1222.4 1223.3 1225.4 1226.3 1228.3 1229.1 1231.3 1232.2 (1230.7 FG) 1214.2 66'33'33'33'33' 66'50'25'25' 25 '25' 50 ' 50 ' 25 '25' 25' 25'50' 1240.9 1230.7 1 LOT 106 OPEN SPACE102'LOT 106 OPEN SPACE5 4 (1213.8 FG) (1247.0 FG) 99'92'95'77'79'100'1237.6 1235.3 1233.0 1228.5 55'55'110'25'25'50'1225.3 35'3 ' 2 ''46'122' 4 '4 ' 43'117' 1 '109' 29'52'3 1'26'84'29' 25'77'52' 14' 36 '51'35' 18' 106' 35' 46'35'131'21'21'78'47'79 '22'4'20'54'44'25'75'20'45'31'31'13'75'13'43'48'75'44'7 5'47'4 4 '4 7 '19'7 5'17' 27' 27'44' 44'7 5'44' 7 5'44'44' 7 5'44' 42' 41' 41' 41'41' 22'28 '7 5'18' 2 2'7'80'12' 8'34'36' 1 0 0' 36'35' 109' 89'10'50'44' 26'42'28'43'27' 27'28' 42'41'102''4'2'2'''35'24'54'33' 34'75'42'75'19'28'9'29' 55'36'27'26'32'77' 28'76' 4 '8'36'36'4'77' 33'75'13'75'44' 44'21'24'47'38'48'38'10' 18'53'128'45'139'45'3'7'46'118'8'35'1 0 5' 4 4 '10'32'9 1' 18' 24' 41' 7 9'42' 42' 41' 9 0' 41' 10 0'41' 2 9' 3 4' 28' 35' 10 5'48'93'119'29'45'14'102' 109'45'4'37'117'41'45' 41'51'46'25'26'51'30'41'85'9'41'87'12'29'87'41'87' 87'41'12'29'41'27'87'18''89'36'38'3'81'5'38'37'85'1' 27' 2 3'51' 40'32'31' 8 3'41' 41' 27' 8 8'2 8' 11' 55'19'31'4'42' 36'19'81'5' 5'83' 90''4'88' 78'41'81'33'41'84'8'41'87'12'88'41'88'29'41'12'29'88'12'88'41'10'34'32'90'55'46'13'37'5'41' 1' 98' 110' 21' 4 3'11'103'50'25'24'45'19' 44' 44' 42' 41' 41' 18'47'4 2 '111'66' 59' 90.76'=8|05'1 0 " R=300.0 0 'L42=.34 '157.88'88' 1228.0 1221.2 1216.1 1215.7 1215.3 1214.9 1214.5 1214.1 1213.3 1217.8 1230.7 1221.7 1224.0 1219.5 1217.9 1228.9 1231.2 1233.5 1235.8 1238.1 7 81 1 2 1 2 1 12'20' 3 94' 92' 91' 91' 95' 96' 110' 13 1'94'98'100'99'100'OPEN SPACE LOT 107 14 0.7 3'N5 5° 3 5'3 9"WL9 L 10ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-014 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-013 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 964-460-015 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-011 ZONING: SP-11 L/U: NC NOT A PART APN 964-460-008 85' 89' 1238.4 LP 1254.2 HP 1249.8 LP 1253.1 HP 34'3.6%2.2%5.4%6.5%3.3%1.0%1.6 %5.0%5.4%9 4 1' 1' 4 19'20'24 7 5 7'36'4'3 29'60'26'45' 40' 42'12'29'41' 43' 41' 11 '4 17177 6'76' 54'47'44'54'23'21'42'43'47'47'34'9203140'633'42'44'42'44'42'39'42'42'44'42'97' 93' 1217.5 1221.0 1222.8 1223.8 1225.8 1226.8 1228.8 1229.8 1231.8 1233.7 1234.7 1236.4 1238.9 1239.8 1240.0 1241.5 1242.9 1243.5 1244.9 1245.6 1247.0 1247.2 1215.1 1215.8 1217.2 1217.9 1220.0 1221.2 20'21'2'43'6 561013'42'38'41' ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 EXIST PARK-N-RIDE/EQUESTRIAN STAGING AREA (LOT C)(LOT E)14' 1205 1205 1210 1210 12101 2 1 5 1 2 1 5 12 15 1215 1215 1 2 1 51 2 1 51215 1215 12151215 122012201220122012201220 1220 1220 1220 1220 1220 1219 12251225 1225 1225 1225 1225 1225 1225 1225 12301230123012301230 1230 1230 1230 1230 1230 1230 1235123512351235 1235 1235 1235 1 2 3 5 1235 1235 1235 1240 1 2 4 0 1240 1240 1240 1240 1240 1240 1240 1245 1245 1245 1245 12451245 1245 1245 1245 1245 124512451250 1250 1225 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0568, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37926) FOR THE CREATION OF 104 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS, THREE NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS (TWO OPEN SPACE LOTS AND ONE LOT THAT WILL BE USED AS A WATER QUALITY BASIN) ON 16.01 ACRES FOR PLANNING AREA 12 OF RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA20- 0568, a Tentative Tract Map Application (TTM 37926) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 21, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA20-0568, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Maps. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 136 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 3,000 square feet and allowable density of 8.3 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 104 residential lots with an average lot size of 4,579 square feet and a minimum lot size of 3,075 square feet and 6.5 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes three non-residential lots (two open space lots and one that will be used as a water quality basin). As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantial ly and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed, including the residential lots and water basin, will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Map: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and is exempt from further environmental review (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and the Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 104 residential lots, three non-residential lots that will be used for open space and water quality is consistent with the proposed project that was analyzed by the EIR and Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-0568, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of October, 2020. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of October, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20-0568 A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-460-009 Less than 8.0 dwelling units MSHCP Category: Residential-Detached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Single Family Single Family with Attached Garage October 21, 2020 October 21, 2023 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project Not Located in the Uptown Specific Plan Area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP #11). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti graffiti coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved tentative maps contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 11. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 12. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in the Development Agreement. 13. Class I Multi-Use Trails. Class I multi use trails as specified in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan shall be provided as per the City of Temecula Multi Use Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. The construction plans for the Class 1 trails shall be included on the perimeter landscape plans and constructed in concurrence with the installation of the landscaping. 14. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 15. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 16. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 17. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 18. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 19. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 20. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 21. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 22. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 23. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 24. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 25. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and S afety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 26. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, this project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 27. Development Impact Fee (DIF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, the developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all City resolutions by paying the appropriate DIF fee. 28. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 29. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 30. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 31. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), and the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 32. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 33. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 34. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 35. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 36. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 37. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans and/or erosion control to satisfaction of the City Engineer shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 38. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 39. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view pursuant to public agency requirements. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 40. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 41. Performance Securities. For common areas, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 42. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 43. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 44. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All conditions 1 thru 48 shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 45. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 46. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 47. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 48. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement pursuant to the Development Agreement through the payment of in lieu fees equivalent to a determined amount of acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 49. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR), (SCH# 97121030), was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. 50. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the course of the review. 51. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 52. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and expense. 53. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 54. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality Management Plan. 55. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 56. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 57. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 58. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 59. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 60. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 61. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant’s signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. (TTM 37926) require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. _____________________ Luke Watson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: _____________________ Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 62. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article ___ CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA ____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. ____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. ____3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the more restrictive provision shall prevail, as long as such provision complies with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. The CC&Rs shall include a provision requiring compliance with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. ____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. 63. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prio r to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 64. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 65. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 66. Outside Agencies Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated August 19, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 67. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geocon West, Inc transmittal dated June 24, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 68. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 69. Underlying approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, and/or (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 70. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 71. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 72. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 73. Implementing facilities. The Developer shall ensure the following: a. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, ultimate improvements to provide vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan. b. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional rights of way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the City Engineer. c. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. d. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Drainage Study and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works. e. All areas within the limits of work must be designed to address Water Quality and designated as self treating areas, self retaining areas, areas draining to self retaining areas, or areas draining to BMPs. 74. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 75. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 76. Landscaped Plans. The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards. b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped parkways, medians or public parks until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility. 77. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 78. Access restriction. The future access onto public streets shall be restricted as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 79. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 80. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 81. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 82. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 83. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. General Telephone; b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; c. Rancho California Water District; d. Eastern Municipal Water District; e. Cable TV Franchise; f. Telephone Company; g. Southern California Edison Company; h. The Gas Company; i. Metropolitan Water District or other affected agencies 84. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from the following streets as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map: a. Butterfield Stage Road with no opening, b. Nicolas Road with no opening, c. Fiesta Ranch Road with one opening, and d. Roripaugh Valley Road with one opening. 85. Easements. Note the following: a. A 50 foot wide easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 86. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements (including parkways) to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve Butterfield Stage Road (122' R/W) to include installation of parkway improvements and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) b. Improve Nicolas Road (110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) c. Improve Fiesta Ranch Road (66’ R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). h. Improve Roripaugh Valley Road (66’ R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 87. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve Streets "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "G", and "H" (Private Street – 50’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. b. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. c. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). d. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. e. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 88. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 89. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 90. Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer (at developer’s cost). The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 91. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. 92. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 93. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 94. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Southern California Edison; b. GTE; or other affected agencies. 95. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 96. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 97. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 98. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 99. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 100. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 101. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 102. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 103. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 104. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map Number 37926 shall be approved and recorded. 105. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 106. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 107. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 108. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 109. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 110. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 111. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 112. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 113. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 114. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 115. Fire Requirement. Water will need to be in and hydrants will need to be active. Also, roads will need to be installed with asphalt before combustible materials can be brought onto the site. 116. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 117. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for all tract home developments, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 118. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 119. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of plans and calculations are required for each individual home, not model type. 120. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@740E0639\@BCL@740E0639.doc October 22, 2020 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA20-0568, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (3) Self addressed stamped envelopes (2) [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 97121030 Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37926 (PA20-0568) Project Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-009 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 21, 2020 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and the five Addendums to the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses, and the five Addendums to the EIR are available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Wingsweep Corporation Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37926 (PA20-0568) Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-009 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 13 residential lots, two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Director of Community Development Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA20-0568 APPLICANT: Wingsweep Corporation PROPOSAL: A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37926) for the creation of 104 single family lots, 2 open space lots, and a water quality basin on 16.01 acres for Planning Area 12 of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be submitted via email and comments vi a text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting. Questions? Please call the Case Planner Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. Item No. 5 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: October 21, 2020 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-0569, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots (one of which will include a water quality basin) on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Wingsweep Corporation General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-11) BACKGROUND SUMMARY On November 26, 2002, the City of Temecula City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29353, which allowed for the subdividing of existing property into what became known as Roripaugh Ranch, including Planning Area 33A. This tentative tract map expired. On January 23, 2018, the City of Temecula City Council approved a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designations of Phase II of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to a Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Land Use. At this hearing, the City Council also approved a Specific Plan Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, which included an update to the development standards and facilities within the sports park, provided a greater variety of residential lot sizes, allowed for age-qualified housing, added design guidelines and architectural styles for a multi-family development option, revised the circulation and aesthetics of Loop Road, improved trails and trail connections, updated the landscape architecture master plan, and revised the development of Long Valley Wash as an amenity for 2 the community, while not increasing the number of dwelling units previously approved within the Specific Plan. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation submitted Planning Application PA20-0569, a Tentative Tract Map 37928 for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots (one of which will include a water quality basin) on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Per the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, this Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) is Planning Area 33A which allows for Low Density Residential development with a maximum of 15 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.5 dwelling units/acre. The TTM proposes 15 residential lots with an average lot size of 23,715 square feet and a minimum lot size of 20,031 square feet and 1.29 dwelling units/acre. The TTM also includes two non-residential lots that will be used for open space, landscaping, and water quality. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on October 8, 2020 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the 3 EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 15 single family lots and two non-residential lots (open space lot and one lot with a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed the EIR and Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 33A allows for a maximum of 15 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.5 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 15 residential lots with an average lot size of 23,715 square feet and a minimum lot size of 20,031 square feet and 1.29 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes two non-residential lots that will be used for open space, landscaping, and a water quality basin. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. 4 The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat; or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots and open space lots (one of which will include a water quality basin) will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications are required as Conditions of Approval. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). 5 The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Determination 6. Notice of Public Hearing RADIANT DR N IC O L A S R D RORIPAUGH VALLEY RD ARISTIDA STFIESTARANCHRDBUTTERFIELDSTAGERDJ E S S I E CI RDYMONDIA WAYSOMMERSBENDPALAVISTADR CANTRELL RDProject Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-0569 0 400 800200 Feet\Date Created: 9/16/2020 1:4,8001 inch = 400 feet 964-460-018 The map PA20-0569.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis X 1514.7 EXIST LOT LINE LOT LINE EXIST ROCK SWALE ROCK SWALE 6' BERM EXIST R/W SECTION LINE 2.0%2.0% 2% 2% MAX 3. EXISTING/PROPOSED ZONING: SP 4. NUMBER OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 15 5. NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS: 2 9. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: SPI EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT: (951) 928-3777 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS: (800) 427-2200 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON: (800) 892-2253 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS: (800) 892-4357 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: SEWER 17. ALL WQMP FACILITIES TO BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED. 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 (SF) AREA NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS LOT USE MAINTAINED BY HOA DENSITY (DU/AC)1.29 10 TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTION 60 0 60 SCALE: 1" = 60' 120 LINE TABLE NAME DIRECTION LENGTH 24,220 20,262 20,244 20,106 20,098 23,935 26,829 22,389 29,802 20,023 20,009 20,064 20,071 20,043 20,001 LOT 6. AVERAGE LOT SIZE: 23,715 SF 7. MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 20,031 SF 8. MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR SP: 20,000 SF LANDSCAPE CURVE TABLE ---- ----------- --------- -------- 37928 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16. UTILITY PURVEYORS: ENGINEER VICINITY MAP 215 SITE T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 20 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 21 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 22 T. 7S, R. 2W, S. 28 N.T.S DR HTIEK NOTNILC DR NOSPMOHT DR NOTNEB DR DLUA 79 DR YORRUOP DR SALOCIN DR ATIRAGRAM YWKP SWOD AEM DR EGAT S DLEIFR ETTUBDR DO OWETIHW EVA NOSREFFEJ DR ZAID 15 15 OAKS RD CA DR S GNIRPS T OH ATE IRRUM 1 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73 TO 85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 6 AND LETTERED LOT K OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37928 CONTACT: JOSEPH GAUTHIER PHONE: (818) 838-0606 MISSION HILLS, CA 91345 SUITE 310 15535 SAN FERNANDO MISSION BLVD WINGSWEEP CORPORATION WINGSWEEP CORPORATION. PROJECT BOUNDARY ARE HELD IN FEE BY ALL EXISTING PARCELS INCLUDED WITHIN THE PROPOSED EASEMENTS CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP NOTE TRACT 37928, PA 33A TRACT 37928, PA 33A 13. TOTAL GROSS AREA: 11.60 ACRES 14. TOTAL NET AREA: 10.57 ACRES 17 LANDSCAPE HOA 44,755LOT I STREET HOA 1 2 11 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. RECORDED JUNE 24, 1958 IN BOOK 2290, PAGE 580 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FOR 50' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE METROPOLITAN CONTACT: JOSH BARRETT, PE PHONE: (951) 782-0707 RIVERSIDE, CA. 92507 1770 IOWA AVE, SUITE 100 RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY OWNER LEGEND AREA (SF) PL 2%2% CL 14'12'10' PL 86' 110' EXISTING BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD (PUBLIC)2:1 MAX2:1 MAX2% 6' S/WL/S 6' 2% 6' S/W L/S 6' 12'10'14'14' MEDIAN LANDSCAPED RAISED 2:1 MAX2:1 MAXLANE BIKE LANE BIKE EXISTING EASEMENTS OF TRACT NO. 29353-2 1. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 6 AND LETTERED LOT K 12. PROPOSED LAND USE: RESIDENTIAL 11. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 2. EXISTING ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 964-460-005, -017, -018, -019 10. SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: L-E L2 N 22°48'55" E 106.82' L1 N 23°01'23" W 27.28' L3 N 1°05'00" E 32.21' 3 4 5 6 7 PR 00128213-996. CONTROL PURPOSES BEING ALL OF LOT "K" PER RETAINED PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD PR 00128213-996. FLOOD CONTROL PER 2006-0290817 O.R. PER PURPOSES GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENTS FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 12 AND MAINTENANCE. 15' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES CONSERVATION DISTRICT. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER ACCESS EASEMENT GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE N.T.S. MEDIAN PAINTED CL 2:1 4'3'10' DG TRAIL 5'10'15' N.T.S. EXISTING NICOLAS ROAD (PUBLIC) 35'20'26'9' 11' VARIES 15'-27' VARIES 20'-35' 6'-9' 2' 2' BENCH 6'R/W EX. N'LY R/W EX. S'LY PA20-0569 131,227 QUITCLAIMED. 12-5-88 O.R. PER 00128213-996 TO BE 20' EASEMENT TO GTE PER INSTRUMENT RECORDED PER PR 00128213-996 TO BE QUITCLAIMED. INST. NO 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PURPOSE PER INST RECORDED DEC 5, 1988 AS ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND OTHER GENERAL TELEPHONE FOR TRANSMISSION OF 20' EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO 29, 2001 AS INST NO. 2001-300190 O.R. CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT RECORDED JUNE 40' WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE RANCHO AND ACCESS. BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES 1091 11.60 ACRES SUM OF TOTAL: 505,169 SF SUM OF NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 177,073 SF SUM OF RESIDENTIAL LOTS: 328,096 SF RAW FILL: 14,000 CY RAW CUT: 14,000 CY 15. APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: ZONING: SP-11 L/U: M2 NOT A PART APN 964-460-009 TR 37926 ---- ---------------- --------- NAME DELTA RADIUS ARC C1 21°43'55" 300.00' 3.11' 16* BASIN AND RETAINING WALLS LOT 16 INCLUDE WATER QUALITY *NOTE: ALLOWED USES FOR PR 00128213-996. FLOOD CONTROL PER 2006-0290823 O.R. PER PURPOSES GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 8 9 O.R. PER PR 00128213-996. THE CITY OF TEMECULA PER 2006-0462959 STREET, HIGHWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES TO OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD, O.R. PER PR 00128213-996. THE CITY OF TEMECULA PER 2006-0462960 STREET, HIGHWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES TO OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD, MODIFIED LOCAL STREET (PRIVATE)2:1 MAX2:1 MAXPL 5' 25' 50' 20' EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ 5' 25' 20' PL EASEMENT UTILITY PUBLIC 3' BENCH/ CL PARKING 8' 2%2% 8' PARKING 2:1 MAX2:1 MAXMAX 2% MAX 2% N.T.S. STREET "I" DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm300.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 2020NICOLAS ROAD 50'25'25' 4 5 6 1 2 3 25'25'50'STREET "I" 7 8 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD10 11 9 12131415 (LOT I)NI COLAS ROAD 55' APN 964-460-005 APN 964-460-017 APN 964-460-018L1 =393'5|=55.00'L273"6.28'=16RR=945 .00 ' |=58 24'47" =963 .43 ' OPEN SPACE LOT 106 964-460-019 APN1 10 185'197'219'227'224'214'2 4 8' 2 9 0'26'41'35' 4 1' 24 '66'89'90'97'92' 87' 94' 36'87'86'89'87'27'27'202'230'234'230'218'L6 15'15'46'193' 2' 15 ' 73' 23'58' 102'14' 12 LOT 16 OPEN SPACE LOT 16 OPEN SPACE 11 LOT 16 OPEN SPACE724.62'N00°33'48"E929.53' N89°26'10"E L 86'24'114' 76' 13 0'18'4 8'3 5' 13 4' 90 '86'87' 90' 108' 10 35'32'45'107'17'34'124'28'63'55'110'55'55'110'55'55'110'538.99'R=1600.|=35300'L=2'992.42"6'R=1600.|=2000'L=8'59.952"8 '219.28' R=1000.00 'L=979 .33 '|=56 06 '42"C1L3L240 '3 6 5 6 7 476'48'57'12 2 125' 14 0.7 3'N5 5° 3 5'3 9"WS01°05'00"WS 77 °2 7'5 9 "E N01°05'00"EN15°25'23"WS 5 5°2 5'46"EZONING: VLL/U: VLNOT A PART APN 957-120-001ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 957-130-013 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 957-130-003 ZONING: SP-11L/U: OSNOT A PART APN 964-640-020OPEN SPACELOT 16206.68'S00°33'48"W10 11 12 13 14 15 161717175'OPEN SPACE LOT 17 7' 19' 89 ' 90 '90'90' 99 '461.34'108'ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 EXIST PARK-N-RIDE/EQUESTRIAN STAGING AREA OPEN SPACE LOT 16 9 8 8 8 110' X 1514.712001195119512001195 1200 X1179.7 X1179.7 X1180.6 X1181.2 X1181.8 X1182.5 X1183.4 X X1184.5 X1184.5 1185 X1185.3 X1185.5 X1185.5 CONC X1186.3 X1186.4 X X1187.2 X 1188.2 X1188.8 1190 1190 1190 1190 1190 X 11901192X1193.4 1194 11941195 1195 1195 1195 X1195.2 1196X1197.1 DENSE 11981198X1199.2 X X MHX X1199.7 12001200 1200 1200 1200 1200 1200X X1200.4 X1200.6 X1201.3 X1201.5 X1201.5 1201.6 X1201.7 X1201.8 X1201.8 X1201.9 X1202.1 X1202.2 X1202.3 X1202.6 X1202.6 X1202.6 X1202.7 X1202.8 X1202.8 X1202.8 X1202.8 X1202.9 X1202.9 X1203.1 X1203.2 X1203.2 X1203.2 X X1203.3 X1203.3 X1203.3 X1203.3 X1203.4 X1203.4 X1203.5 X1203.5 X1203.5 X1203.5 X1203.5 X1203.5 X1203.7 X1204.2 X1204.2 X X1204.4 X1204.5 X X1204.5 X1204.5 X1204.6 X X1204.6 X X X1204.8 X X1204.8 X1204.9 1205 1205 1205 X1205.2 X X X1205.4 X1205.5 X1205.5 X1205.6 X X1205.7 X1205.7 X1205.7 X1205.8 X1206.2 X1206.2 X1206.3 X1206.3 X1206.4 X1206.4 X1206.5 X X1206.7 X1206.7 X1206.7 X X1206.9 X X1207.2 X1207.3 X X1207.3 X1207.4 X1207.5 PBXX1207.6 X MHX X1207.7 X1207.7 X X1207.7 X1207.8 DENSE TREES ASPH X1208.2 X1208.3 X1208.3 1208.3 X1208.3 X1208.3 X1208.4 X1208.4 X X1208.5 X1208.5 X1208.5 X1208.5 X1208.8 PB X X1209.2 X1209.3 X1209.3 X1209.5 X1209.5 X X1209.5 X X1209.6 X X X1210.4 X1210.4 X1210.5 X1210.5 X PBX X1211.1 X X1211.4 MHX X1211.5 X1211.6 X1211.7 X X1211.8 XMHX X X PBX X P B XX X MHX P B X X X X1212.4 X1212.5 X X1212.5 X1212.6 X1212.6 X1212.7 X X X1212.8 CONC ASPH X X X X X X1213.2 X1213.2 X X1213.3 X1213.3 X1213.3 X X1213.4 X1213.4 X1213.4 X MHX XCONC X X1213.7 X1213.7 X1213.7 X1213.7 XX MHX MHX X MHX XX P BX XX X X PBX X X X X1214.3 XX1214.4 X1214.4 X X1214.5 CONC X1214.6 X X X X1214.8 X CONC X X X X X X X PBXMHX X1215.1 X1215.2 X1215.2 X X X X1215.2 X XX1215.3 X1215.3 X PBXX X X X1215.4 X1215.4 X1215.4 ASPH X1215.4 X X1215.4 X X1215.5 X1215.6 X X1215.7 X1215.7 X1215.7 X X1215.8 X1215.9 X1216.2 X1216.3 X1216.3X1216.3 X1216.5 X1216.6 X1216.8 X1217.1 X1217.2 X1217.4 X1217.6 XX X X1218.4 X1218.5 X1218.6 X1218.7 X1218.7 X1219.0 X1219.4 X1219.5 X1219.5 X1219.7 X DENSE TREES PROP. FH 6' SOUND WALL FH EXIST FH EXIST PROP. FH EXIST FH. EXIST LOT LINE EXIST FH LOT LINE EXIST GRADED SWALE 3' WIDE EXIST. GROUND PROP. 6' SOUND WALL 6' SOUND BERM EXIST. GROUND PROP. 6' SOUND WALL EXIST. GROUND 1210.11 FS 6' SOUND BERM EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND EXIST. GROUND WALL RETAINING 5' MAX LANDSCAPE PLANS MONUMENT WALL PER 4' MAX RETAINING WALL 6' SOUND BERM 6' SOUND WALL 1205.48 FS 1205.81 FS (1206.67 FS) EXIST R/W 1200.10 FS PROP. 18" SD HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE HINGE LINE LINE HINGE SECTION LINE BASIN PROP. CATCH FS/HP) (1207.45 MONUMENT WALL PROP COMMUNITY EXIST. 24" SD 1205.4 FG 1206.5 FG 1207.4 FG 1208.3 FG 1208.3 FG 1204.0 FG 1216.2 FG 1218.1 FG 1220.1 FG 1216.0 FG 1214.0 FG 1212.3 FG 1211.3 FG 60 0 60 SCALE: 1" = 60' 120 1. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT PL: 30 FT 2. MINIMUM LOT FRONTAGE AT FLAG: 25 FT 3. MINIMUM WIDTH AT SETBACK: 60 FT 4. MINIMUM LOT DEPTH: 90 FT -SIDE ENTRY GARAGE: 10 FT 6. MINIMUM CORNER YARD SETBACK: 15 FT 7. MINIMUM INTERIOR YARD SETBACK: 10 FT 8. MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 20 FT 9. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 50% -FRONT ENTRY GARAGE: 18 FT 5. MINIMUM FRONT YARD SETBACK: 25 FT PL3:13:1BOUNDARY W'LY TRACT 2:12:1A 2 D 2F 2B2 E2CROSS SECTION N.T.S. WEST BOUNDARYA 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NORTH BOUNDARYB 2 2:12:1STAGE ROAD BUTTERFIELD 14.5'2:1PL2:112" 37928 EXHIBIT A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 8. MAXIMUM HEIGHT: 2 STORIES, 35 FEET SPA LOT DESIGNATION REQUIREMENTS (L) 2' BENCH ROAD NICOLAS CROSS SECTION N.T.S. ADJACENT LOTSF 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. SOUTH BOUNDARYE 2 CROSS SECTION N.T.S. EAST BOUNDARYD 22:12:12' BENCH ROAD NICOLAS C2CROSS SECTION N.T.S. NORTH BOUNDARYC 2 2' BENCH BOUNDARY N'LY TRACT EXIST. R/W BOUNDARY E'LY TRACT EXIST R/W 2 RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA MAP ON FILE IN BOOK 342, PAGES 73 TO 85, INCLUSIVE, OF MAPS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF LOT 6 AND LETTERED LOT K OF TRACT MAP NO. 29353-2 AS SHOWN BY IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 37928 PROPOSED WQ+HMP BASIN 1202.5 LOT 15 1208.2 LOT 7 1. MANAGEMENT PLAN, DATED APRIL 28, 2020 WATER QUALITY & HYDROMODIFICATION REFERENCED DOCUMENTS 10' MIN. SETBACK SIDE YARD 20' MIN. SETBACK REAR YARD 20' MIN. SETBACK REAR YARD 10' MIN. SETBACK SIDE YARD 1194.6 BOT 2:12:1 15' MIN. TRAIL FIRE ACCESS NATIVE SOIL 50' BOUNDARY N'LY TRACT EX R/W PL VARIES LOT 16 MAINTAINED HOA 5' TO 13' PL LOT 16 HOA MAINTAINED PL 2:1 15' MIN SETBACK YARD REAR 71' MIN FUEL MOD SETBACK 10' MIN. SETBACK SIDE YARD TRACT MAP BOUNDARY CENTERLINE PROPOSED RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION TOE OF SLOPE TOP OF SLOPE EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT PROPOSED LOT LINE ACCESS RESTRICTION LEGENDABBREVIATIONS BOT BOTTOM OF BASIN FH FIRE HYDRANT FS FINISHED SURFACE SD STORM DRAIN TOP OF BASINTOP WQ+HMP MANAGEMENT PLAN HYDROMODIFICATION WATER QUALITY AND L/S LANDSCAPE S/W SIDEWALK EXIST.EXISTING PROP.PROPOSED DAYLIGHT LINE 2:1 SLOPE ROAD ACCESS CONTROL FLOOD LOT 3 LOT 13 LOT 11 LOT 12 PA20-0569 1204.1 1208.2 LOT 7 1204.4 1206.2 1205.3 ESMT MWD VARIES 8'-23' LOT 16 VARIES 193' - 230' LOT 16 VARIES MIN 5% ZONING: SP-11 L/U: M2 NOT A PART APN 964-460-009 TR 37926 1. MANAGEMENT PLAN, DATED APRIL 28, 2020 WATER QUALITY & HYDROMODIFICATION 10 PROPOSED EASEMENTS 1 2 11 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. RECORDED JUNE 24, 1958 IN BOOK 2290, PAGE 580 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA FOR 50' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE METROPOLITAN EXISTING EASEMENTS 3 4 5 6 7 PR 00128213-996. CONTROL PURPOSES BEING ALL OF LOT "K" PER RETAINED PRIVATE EASEMENT FOR FLOOD PR 00128213-996. FLOOD CONTROL PER 2006-0290817 O.R. PER PURPOSES GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENTS FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 12 AND MAINTENANCE. 15' EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES CONSERVATION DISTRICT. COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER ACCESS EASEMENT GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE QUITCLAIMED. 12-5-88 O.R. PER 00128213-996 TO BE 20' EASEMENT TO GTE PER INSTRUMENT RECORDED PER PR 00128213-996 TO BE QUITCLAIMED. INST. NO 354239 O.R. PLOTTED PER RS 87/28-34, PURPOSE PER INST RECORDED DEC 5, 1988 AS ELECTRIC ENERGY FOR COMMUNICATION AND OTHER GENERAL TELEPHONE FOR TRANSMISSION OF 20' EASEMENT STRIP OF LAND GRANTED TO 29, 2001 AS INST NO. 2001-300190 O.R. CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT RECORDED JUNE 40' WIDE EASEMENT GRANTED TO THE RANCHO AND ACCESS. BLANKET EASEMENT FOR DRAINAGE FACILITIES PR 00128213-996. FLOOD CONTROL PER 2006-0290823 O.R. PER PURPOSES GRANTED TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY EASEMENT FOR FLOOD CONTROL AND DRAINAGE 8 9 O.R. PER PR 00128213-996. THE CITY OF TEMECULA PER 2006-0462959 STREET, HIGHWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES TO OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD, O.R. PER PR 00128213-996. THE CITY OF TEMECULA PER 2006-0462960 STREET, HIGHWAY AND UTILITY PURPOSES TO OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROAD, DATE BY REVISIONSENGINEER OF WORK LAND SURVEYOR L.S. 8805WILLIAM ROHAL DATE DATE DRAWN BY:DESIGNED BY:CHECKED BY:APPROVED BY: ROG ROG NCS OF SHT 2 PLOT DATE:JN 17883E22-SEP-2020 c Rick Engineering Company2020\\cp.rickeng.com\projects\C_RIV_G\17883\17883-E_Wingsweep\Civil\17883Etm301.dgn ROY EVRUS DNAL DESNE CILL AHOR MAILLIW No. 8805 ST ATEO F CALIOFRNIASTAT O F O AIIISEEDSS O ALE N I EERECALIF RNICVLREGTRPROFEINGNNo. 63285 LLIEN 'O LRAC DRA HCIRExp. 6-30-22 RICHARD CARL O'NEILL R.C.E. 63285 REVISED: JULY 24, 2020 PREPARED: MAY 1, 2020 2ND SUBMITTAL - JULY 24, 2020NICOLAS ROAD 50'25'25' 4 5 6 1 2 3 25'25'50'STREET "I" 7 8 BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD10 11 9 12131415 (LOT I) 1.0%NI COLAS ROAD 1194.6 BOT 1199.1 TOP 55' APN 964-460-005 APN 964-460-017 APN 964-460-0181202.8 1203.2 1204.1 1204.9 1205.8 1206.5 1202.5 1203.4 1204.4 1205.3 1206.2 1207.0 1207.7 1208.0 1208.2 L1 =393'5|=55.00'L273"6.28'=16RR=945 .00 ' |=58 24'47" =963 .43 ' OPEN SPACE LOT 106 964-460-019 APN1 10 1.0%185'197'219'227'224'214'2 4 8' 2 9 0'26'41'35' 4 1' 24 '66'89'90'97'92' 87' 94' 36'87'86'89'87'27'27'202'230'234'230'218'15'15'46'193' 2' 15 ' 73' 23'58' 102'14' 12 LOT 16 OPEN SPACE LOT 16 OPEN SPACE 11 LOT 16 OPEN SPACE724.62'N00°33'48"E929.53' N89°26'10"E L 86'24'114' 76' 13 0'18'4 8'3 5' 13 4' 90 '86'87' 90' 108' 10 35'32'45'107'17'34'124'28'63'55'110'55'55'110'55'55'110'2%2%2%(TYP)(TYP)(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2%(TYP)2 %(TYP)R=1600.|=35300'L=2'992.42"6'C1L3L240 '3 6 5 6 7 476'48'57'12 2 125' 14 0.7 3'N5 5° 3 5'3 9"WZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 957-130-013 ZONING: VL L/U: VL NOT A PART APN 957-130-003 ZONING: SP-11L/U: OSNOT A PART APN 964-640-02034'OPEN SPACELOT 16206.68'S00°33'48"W10 11 12 13 14 15 161717175'OPEN SPACE LOT 17 7' 19' 89 ' 90 '90'90' 99 '461.34'108'ZONING: SP-11 L/U: P NOT A PART APN 964-460-003 EXIST PARK-N-RIDE/EQUESTRIAN STAGING AREA OPEN SPACE LOT 16 9 8 8 8 119511951195 1195 1195 1195 1195120012001200120012001 2 0 0 120 0 12001203 1204 1205 1205 1205 1205 12 0 5 1205 1205 1205 1204 1203 1205 1206 1207 1206 1207 1206 1207 1206 12071208 1208 1208 1208 1209 1208120912091210 1210 1210121012101210 1210 1210 1215 121512151 2 1 512 1512201180 118 5 1185 1200 1200 1205 1205 1205 12051205 1205 1210 12101210 1210 1215 12151215 1215 1215 1215122012201225 1210 1215 1220 1215 1215 121012051200 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0569, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37928) FOR THE CREATION OF 15 SINGLE FAMILY LOTS AND TWO NON-RESIDENTIAL LOTS (ONE OPEN SPACE LOT AND ONE LOT THAT WILL BE USED AS A WATER QUALITY BASIN) ON 11.60 ACRES FOR PLANNING AREA 33A OF RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE II, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 4, 2020, Wingsweep Corporation filed Planning Application No. PA20- 0569, a Tentative Tract Map Application (TTM 37928) in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on October 21, 2020, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA20-0569, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the entire Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan is 2,015. With what is proposed as a part of this Tentative Tract Map plus what has been previously approved and constructed as part of Phase I and Phase II the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been entered into any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Maps. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan which allows for 2,015 residential units along with public institutional, public park, private recreation center, and open space development. Specifically, Planning Area 33A allows for a maximum of 15 residential lots with a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet and allowable density of 1.5 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map proposes 15 residential lots with an average lot size of 23,715 square feet and a minimum lot size of 20,031 square feet and 1.29 dwelling units/acre. The Tentative Map also includes two non-residential lots that will be used for open space, landscaping, and a water quality basin. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. An Environmental Impact Report and subsequent Addenda to the EIR have been prepared for the project. The project is conditioned to comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. Therefore, the design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots and open space lots (one of which will include a water quality basin) will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications are required as Conditions of Approval. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been satisfied through the Development Agreement. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch Addendum and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on November 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 15 single family lots and two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed the EIR and Addenda. .The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-0569, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 21st day of October, 2020. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2020- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 21st day of October, 2020, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20-0569 A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Assessor's Parcel No.: 964-460-005 964-460-017 964-460-018 964-460-019 Less than 8.0 dwelling units MSHCP Category: Residential-Detached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Single Family Single Family with Attached Garage October 21, 2020 October 21, 2023 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project Not Located in the Uptown Specific Plan Area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Exemption. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashiers check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP #11). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti graffiti coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2016 0156276 recorded on April 20, 2016. 7. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. SCH# 97121030. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved tentative maps contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 11. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 12. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in the Development Agreement. 13. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 14. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 15. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 16. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 17. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 18. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 19. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 20. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 21. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. A 30-day preconstruction survey, in accordance with MSHCP guidelines and survey protocol, shall be conducted prior to ground disturbance. The results of the 30-day preconstruction survey shall be submitted to the Planning Division prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 22. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 23. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 24. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 25. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, this project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. 26. Development Impact Fee (DIF). Pursuant to the Development Agreement, the developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all City resolutions by paying the appropriate DIF fee. 27. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Eastern Municipal Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 28. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 29. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 30. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), and the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 31. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 32. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection, for common HOA area only, will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 33. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 34. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans as shown in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron or decorative block and wrought iron combination to take advantage of views for side and rear yards. c. Wood and/or vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above. 35. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 36. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans and/or erosion control to satisfaction of the City Engineer shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 37. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 38. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view pursuant to public agency requirements. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 39. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 40. Performance Securities. For common areas, performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 41. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 42. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and i ts service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 43. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 44. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 45. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 46. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 47. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement pursuant to the Development Agreement through the payment of in lieu fees equivalent to a determined amount of acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 48. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR), (SCH# 97121030), was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division. c. This project is within a Liquefaction Hazard Zone. 49. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the course of the review. 50. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall inclu de such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 51. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and expense. 52. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 53. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality Management Plan. 54. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 55. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 56. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 57. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 58. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 59. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 60. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant’s signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. (TTM 37928) require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. _____________________ Luke Watson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: _____________________ Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 61. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article ___ CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA ____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. ____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. ____3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the more restrictive provision shall prevail, as long as such provision complies with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. The CC&Rs shall include a provision requiring compliance with all Federal, State or local laws, ordinances and regulations. ____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. 62. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 63. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 64. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 65. Outside Agencies Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated August 19, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 66. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geocon West, Inc transmittal dated June 24, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 67. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 68. Underlying approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, and/or (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29593, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353 69. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 70. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&W CD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 71. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 72. Implementing facilities. The Developer shall ensure the following: a. Construction of the development permitted by the Specific Plan, including recordation of final subdivision maps, may be carried out in stages provided that, ultimate improvements to provide vehicular access is constructed for all dwelling units in each stage of development and further provided that such development conforms substantially with the intent and purpose of the Specific Plan. b. Adequate primary and secondary access shall be provided for each phase of development as approved by the City Engineer. Additional rights of way at entries to the aforementioned sites may be required to provide for turning lanes as directed by the City Engineer. c. Drainage facilities within each phase shall be constructed immediately after the completion of the site grading and prior to or concurrently with the initial site development within that phase. d. The Developer shall construct the proposed on and offsite drainage facility improvements and the interim detention basin provision as recommended in the Drainage Study and/or as directed by the Department of Public Works. e. All areas within the limits of work must be designed to address Water Quality and designated as self treating areas, self retaining areas, areas draining to self retaining areas, or areas draining to BMPs. 73. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 74. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 75. Landscaped Plans. The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards. b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped parkways, medians or public parks until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility. 76. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 77. Access restriction. The future access onto public streets shall be restricted as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 78. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 79. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 80. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 81. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 82. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. General Telephone; b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; c. Rancho California Water District; d. Eastern Municipal Water District; e. Cable TV Franchise; f. Telephone Company; g. Southern California Edison Company; h. The Gas Company; i. Metropolitan Water District or other affected agencies 83. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from the following streets as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map: a. Butterfield Stage Road with no opening, and b. Nicolas Road with one opening. 84. Easements. Note the following: a. A 50 foot wide easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 85. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for informational purposes prior to issuance of any permit. 86. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements (including parkways, medians and public park improvements) to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Improve Nicolas Road (110' R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) 87. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve Street "I" (Private Street – 50’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. b. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. c. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). d. Identify whether gates will be proposed at entrances to project. If so, configuration, stacking distance, and turn-around ability will need to be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department and the Department of Public Works. e. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 88. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements. 89. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 90. Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer (at developer’s cost). The appraiser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 91. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. 92. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 93. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 94. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Metropolitan Water District; b. Rancho California Water District; c. GTE; d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; or other affected agencies. 95. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 96. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 97. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 98. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 99. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 100. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 101. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 102. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 103. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 104. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map Number 37928 shall be approved and recorded. 105. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of add resses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 106. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 107. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 108. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 109. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 110. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 111. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Life Safety Conditions. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal 112. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 113. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set m inimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 114. Construction Phasing. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction (CFC Chapter 5) 115. Fire Requirement. Water will need to be in and hydrants will need to be active. Also, roads will need to be installed with asphalt before combustible materials can be brought onto the site. 116. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads and driveways shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 117. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet for all tract housing developments with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 118. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Fire Systems (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). All Residential structures are now required under the most current edition of the California Residential Code (identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code), to be equipped throughout with an automatic fire sprinkler system. 119. Required Submittals (Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of plans and calculations are required for each individual home, not model type. 120. C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@740E8677\@BCL@740E8677.doc October 22, 2020 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA20-0569, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (3) Self addressed stamped envelopes (2) [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 97121030 Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37928 (PA20-0569) Project Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-005, 017, 018, 019 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on October 21, 2020 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the EIR and the five Addendums to the EIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) that was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, together with comments and responses, and the five Addendums to the EIR are available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: Wingsweep Corporation Project Title: Roripaugh Ranch TTM 37928 (PA20-0569) Location: Roripaugh Ranch Phase II – APN 964-460-005, 017, 018, 019 Project Description: Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II 2. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2002. An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared and certified on December 17, 2002 as part of this effort. Since that time, five Addendum EIRs have been prepared for the project area with the most recent adopted on January 14, 2020. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Roripaugh Ranch EIR and no further environmental review is required (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the EIR, the First Addendum to the EIR adopted on April 23, 2013, the Second Addendum to the EIR adopted on March 22, 2016, the Third Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 23, 2018, the Fourth Addendum to the EIR adopted on Novembe r 6, 2019, the Fifth Addendum to the EIR adopted on January 14, 2020 (collectively “EIR and Addenda”), and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the EIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the EIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map to construct 13 residential lots, two non-residential lots (one open space lot and a water quality basin) is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the EIR and the Addenda. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in EIR and the Addenda. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Director of Community Development Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA20-0569 APPLICANT: Wingsweep Corporation PROPOSAL: A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37928) for the creation of 15 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 11.60 acres for Planning Area 33A of Roripaugh Ranch Phase II ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 DATE OF HEARING: October 21, 2020 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 p.m. PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the closure of the Library and other City Buildings and Facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the complete agenda is only viewable on the City website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx. For more information or have questions regarding this project, please contact Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Principal Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to Lynn Lehner at lynn.lehner@temeculaca.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for the October 21, 2020 Planning Commission meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Principal Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting. Questions? Please call the Case Planner Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.