Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout020404 PC Agenda . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance 10 participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE FEBRUARY 4, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. ........ CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: RollCall: Commissioner Olhasso Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chiniaeff PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and slate your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary m:!Q[ to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 4, 2004 R: IF LAN COM MIA ge nda s \2004102-04-04. doc ,v oJ' 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of December 17, 2003 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 3 Planninq Application No. PA03-0471 a Development Plan to construct a 12.551 square foot buildinq on 0.40 acres located at 28461 Old Town Front Street. qenerallv located on the west side of Old Town Front Street. approximately 150 feet north of 6th Street. Stuart Fisk. Assistant Planner COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: February 18, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 R: \P LAN COM M\A 9 e nd as \2004\02-04-0 4 , doc 2 . . . . ITEM #2 . . . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DECEMBER 17, 2003 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:02 P.M., on Wednesday December 17, 2003, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio and Chairman Chiniaeff Absent None PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aqenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of December 17, 2003 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION 2.1 Approve the Minutes of November 19, 2003 MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2. Commissioner T el~sio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS 3 Maraarita Medical Plaza Sian Proaram RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file. R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 Senior Planner Naaseh presented a brief staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . . That the applicant requested to amend the Sign Program to allow placement of second- story signage on the Promenade Medical Building; . That the building has been approved for a sign program that allows first-story signage, signage on the towers, but that does allow second-story sign age; . That the Development Code would permit tenant identification signs for office buildings if the main entrances to each suite were from the exterior of the building; . That if the Commission would permit second-story signage, the Development Code, under the Sign Program, would allow staff to exceed the requirements and standards of the Development Code, as long as the proposed signs enhance the existing building; . That the proposed channel letters will not enhance the existing building. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Mr. Ed Anderson, 41278 Margarita Road, Manager of the Limited Liability Corporation (LLC), spoke in favor of second-story signage, relaying the following: That the applicant has met with staff and that the proposed two signs on the second- floor would be to identify two doctors; . . That the two doctors in the building are a new orthopedic office relying on signage for business; . That the property was purchased as a commercial piece of property anticipating that the building would receive the benefits of retail pricing and retail identification; That the Development Code would allow for signage on the second-floor if: 0 The entrances were directly from the outside; 0 The upper suites were to haye entrances directly to the outside; 0 The lettering on signage would be black lettering the applicant is looking for direction from the Commission. Dr. Herron, 41278 Margarita Road, relayed that in order to reduce signage to Advanced Orthopedic yersus Adyanced Orthopedic Surgery Center, it would require his name to be changed through the Medical Board of California, At this time, the public hearing was closed. Commissioner Mathewson expressed reservations with channel lettering, size, and style of the proposed signs, noting that this would detract from the architectural style of the building. . R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 2 . . . MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue this item to the January 7, 2004 meeting. Commissioner Telesio seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING Continued from November 19, 2003 4 Planninq Application No. PA03-0347 submitted by Griffin Communities. is a product review for 100 detached sinale familv residences within Plannina Area 4A of the Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinas Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Staqe Road (APN: 957-340-001) RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Requesting a continuance to January 7, 2004. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to continue Item No.4 to January 7, 2004. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. Continued from December 3, 2003 5 Planninq Application No. PA03-0432. PA03-0433. PA03-0435. and PA03-0436 Four product reviews within the Harveston Specific Plan [(Tracts 30668. 30668-1. 30669-1 (Sarasota): 30667. 30667-2 (Chatham): 30667-1. 30667-3 (St. Auaustine); 30668-2. & 30669-2 (Auburn Ln.)] aenerallv located south of Harveston Lake. north of Loop Rd. and east of Loop Road RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-064 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0432 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 109-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (SARASOTA, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2) 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DENYING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0433 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 78-LOT SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (CHATHAM, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1). 5.3 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-066 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0435 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 93-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (ST. AUGUSTINE, PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 1) . 5.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2003-067 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0436 PRODUCT REVIEW OF A 119-LOT SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (AUBURN LN. PHASE 2 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN PLANNING AREA 2) Associate Planner Powers presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the revised plans as follows: Sarasota: Plan 1 . Spanish Electric: . Entry porch changed as Spanish tower element was added; . Spanish tower element added with wrought iron detail above entry. Cottaqe: . Switched design elements on front two gables in order to enlarge the detail at the second gable. Craftsman: . Revised porch to project in front of bedroom two; . Revised porch to gable details, window at bedroom two, added shed dormer and changed shingle siding to hardy board siding only. Plan 2 Spanish Electric . Reyised entry to court and bonus room layout. . R:\MinulesPC\2003\ 121703 4 . . . Cottaqe Revised entry to court and bonus room layout; Revised gable design elements at entry to court and at gable above entry door; Revised gable design elements at entry to court and rear elevation and at gable above entry door. Craftsman Revised entry with porch and revised bonus room layout; . Added porch and recommended details, siding only (not shingle siding), and gable beam details, and design window icon at master bedroom. Plan 3 Spanish Electric Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation; . Added round windows, wrought iron detail revised entry door recess and added sidelights. Cottaae Revised entry recess; Revised entry with sidelights and stone below; Revised windows at first and second floor per elevation. Craftsman . Revised windows at first and second floor per eleyation; Revised porch with recommended details, added style icon windows above, and revised shingle siding to hardy board siding only. St. Auaustine Plan 1 Enhanced elevations, added closed shutters to rear of tandem garage. R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 5 Plan two Spanish Colonial . Added soft arches to the recessed front windows. American Farmhouse Added pot-shelf below first floor front window. Plan 3 Spanish Colonial . Added full arch to the front center window over garage. Italianate Revised garage door pattern. Cape Cod . Added additional shingle siding and returned down side elevation of living room to both standard and enhanced side. Auburn Lane . Plan 1 Spanish Colonial Enhanced wrought iron potholder located below second-story window; rectangular windows above single story edge (left side) revised to arched windows. Cottaae . Revised sloping roof above garage to a swooping or curved roof. Plan 2 Spanish Colonial Enhanced wrought iron potholder located below second-story window; small rectangular windows above garage revised to arched windows, Cottaqe Added stone wainscot base at single story entry mass. Plan 3 . R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 6 . . . Spanish Colonial Enhanced wrought iron potholder located below second-story window. Craftsman . Added shed roof supported by knickers above three-window pattern at second-story; added 8" lap siding at three window mass (this siding wraps around the right elevation and also continues below on first floor behind porch). Chatham Because revised plans were received after the distribution of the agenda, the Planning Commission will review the reyisions but noted that final action will be taken at a future meeting. Plan 1 American Farmhouse Siding was added to wrap around both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans. Spanish Colonial Provided revised elevation showing shutters and a wrought iron detail above the window and decorative light fixture on that element. Chairman Chiniaeff suggested adding a wrought iron decorative on side windows. Plan 2 Colonial . Siding was added to wrap around to both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans. Cottaqe . The front elevation was re-worked to have the entryway include a swooping roof and a curve in the wall to the right side of the pop-out and added shutters and a pot-shelf. Plan 3 East Coast Traditional Siding was to wrap around both sides of the residence on the standard and enhanced plans. At this time, the public hearing was closed. R:\MinutesPC\2003\ 121703 7 MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve PA03-0432, PA03-0435, and PA03-0436, modifying Condition of Approval No.4 re: within 45 days from the approval.. .and the qaraqe on the other street on lots where feasible... Deleting Condition of Approval Nos. 1 re: County administrative fee and 22, re: compliance of all desian components and bring back to the Commission for approval PA03-0433. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice yote reflected unanimous approval. . The Planning Commission thanked the Harveston Group for its work and professionalism. Commissioner Olhasso presented staff with a gift. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS Commissioner Guerriero thanked staff for acting so quickly on the black plastic on the corner of Solana and Margarita Roads. Chairman Chiniaeff relayed that he would be absent the first meeting of January and that it has been his pleasure to serve as Chairman for the past two years. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske shared with the Commission some elevations of Crowne Hill that will be going directly to the Director's Hearing, and wished the Commission a Merry Christmas. ADJOURNMENT . At 7:40 p.m., Chairman Chiniaeff formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetina to be held on Wednesdav. January 7.2003 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Dennis W. Chiniaeff Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning . R:\MinulesPC\2003\ 121703 8 . ITEM #3 . . . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION February 4, 2004 Stuart Fisk Title: Assistant Planner File Number Application Type: PA03-0471 Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CECA: (Check One) A Development Plan to construct a 12,551 square foot building on 0.40 acres located at 28461 Old Town Front Street, generally located on the west side of Old Town Front Street, approximately 150 feet north of 6th Street. [8J Approve with Conditions D Deny D Continue for Redesign D Continue to: D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial [8J Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 (In-Fill) D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\D 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Center Expansioo\STAFF REPORT,doc I PROJECT DATA SUMMARY: . Completion Date: Matthew Fagan (for RCM Capital Partners, LLC) August25,2003 Applicant: Mandatory Action Deadline Date: February 25, 2004 General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Old Town Specific Plan (SP-5; Tourist Retail Core) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: North: South: East: West: Vacant Retail Retail RetaiVRestaurant Open Space (Murrieta Creek) Lot Area: 0.40 acres Total Floor Area/Ratio 71.5% Landscape Area/Coverage 9.9% . Parking Required/Provided 0 spaces required/7 spaces provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY: ~1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ~2. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, city-wide Design Guidelines, the Old Town Specific Plan, and the Development Code with the exception of the proposed building height and number of stories, for which the Old Town Specific Plan allows the City Council approval of increased heights. On October 13, 2003 the Old Town Local Review Board reviewed the proposed project and made similar findings of consistency and made a recommendation for approyal of the project. ANALYSIS Site Plan The proposed building will be located adjacent to the existing Chaparral Center, which is situated on the south side of the project site, with no setback between the buildings. Visually, the building will look like an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center. . R:ID NOO3\O3-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlSTAFF REPORT,doc 2 . . . The building setbacks either meet or exceed the minimum requirements of the Specific Plan and the proposed 71.5% lot coverage is well below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 100%. Although the Old Town Specific Plan does not require that parking spaces be provided, a total of 7 spaces have been provided and the proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site. The project has been conditioned to record a parcel merger prior to issuance of a building permit in order to avoid building oyer lot lines. Architecture The architectural style for the proposed building is the Old Town western style. The proposed building will incorporate architectural features from the existing Chaparral Center including expansive porch and balcony areas, knee braces at posts, wood sash windows, vertical board and batten siding, wood lap siding, roof shingles to match those used on the existing Chaparral Center, and varying rooflines to minimize building massing and to visually tie the proposed building to the existing Chaparral Center. Exterior colors will match those of the existing Chaparral Center. The architectural plans indicate locations for building and tenant signs and a potential mural. The project has been conditioned to submit and receive approval for a detailed sign program prior to issuance of a building permit. The project, which will be architecturally integrated with the existing three-story and forty-seven foot tall Chaparral Center, conforms to all the development regulations of the Old Town Specific Plan with the exception of the proposed building height and number of stories. The Old Town Specific Plan limits building heights to two stories and 28.0 feet, while like the existing Chaparral Center building, the proposed building has three stories and a height of 44 feet 10 inches. However, Section III.F.8 of the Specific Plan allows the City Council to approve increases to the building height limitations. Staff has determined that an increase to the height limitations for the proposed project is justified because the proposed building is essentially an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center, which does have three stories and a height of 47 feet. Furthermore, the proposed building allows for additional retail and office space in Old Town and the generous porch and balcony areas and varying rooflines minimize building massing and visually tie the proposed building to the existing Chaparral Center, resulting in a desirable addition to Old Town Front Street. The project has been conditioned that final approval of this development plan is contingent upon City Council approval of the proposed building height of 44 feet 10 inches and three stories (condition of approval no. 3). The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan. Plant materials include Purple Leaf Plum and Evergreen Pear trees, Fortnight Iris, Escallonia, Daylily, Variegated Tobira and Wheeler's Dwarf Tobira shrubs and Boston Ivy. Plant materials and placement carry out the Old West theme, soften the development and unify the area as a pleasant environment. The landscaping also serves to tie the project to the existing Chaparral Center in that the landscaping theme from the existing building is carried over to the proposed building. Existing trees and shrubs along Old Town Front Street will be protected during construction and will remain in place. The project proposes to landscape 1,732 square feet or 9.9 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum requirement of zero percent in the TRC (Tourist Retail Core) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan. The Old Town Specific Plan recommends a minimum of one 15-gallon R:\D 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Cenler Expansion\STAFF REPORT-doc 3 size tree for eyery 800 square feet of landscaping and one shrub or vine for eyery 50 feet of landscaping proYided. The project far exceeds this recommendation since the project should proYide a minimum of two trees and thirty-five shrubs based on the Specific Plan recommendations, while seven trees and 162 shrubs are provided. Although the Old Town Specific Plan states that shrubs should be a minimum of 5-gallon size at time of planting, the project proposes ninety-five 1-gallon daylilies. Howeyer, staff has determined that this is acceptable because 108 5-gallon shrubs will be provided, thereby exceeding the recommended number of 5-gallon shrubs by seventy-three. Access and Circulation The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the previously approved City General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plan and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further enyironmental review. (Class, 15332, In-Fill Development Project) CONCLUSIONJRECOMM ENDA TION: Staff has determined that with the exception of the proposed building height and number of stories, the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and policies. Because the Old Town Specific Plan does allow City Council to approve increases to the limitations on building height and number of stories, the project has been conditioned that final approval of this development plan is contingent upon City Council approval of the proposed building height of 44 feet 10 inches and three stories (condition of approval no. 3). Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution approving the Development Plan with the attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as wel1 as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan with the exception of the proposed building height, for which Section III.F.B of the Specific Plan al1ows for City Council approval of increased building heights. The proposed increase to the building height limitations and number of stories are justified because the proposed building al1ows for additional retail and office space in Old Town and provides architectural features that are appropriate to the site and that match the existing Chaparral Center including generous porch and balcony areas and varying rooflines that visual1y tie the proposed building to the existing three-story and 47 foot tal1 R\D N003\O3-Q471 Chapaml Center ExpansionlSTAFF REPORT,doc 4 . . . . . . Chaparral center, resulting in a desirable addition to Old Town Front Street. A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the building meets the architectural requirements as stated in the Site Development Standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the massing of the building. The proposed architecture complements and enhances the visual character along Old Town Front Street and will be a welcome addition to the existing buildings. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Review Sheet - Blue Page 6 2. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7 3. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval R:ID P\2003\O3-0471 Chapaml Center ExpansionIST AFF REPORT,doc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET R:ID 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionIST AFF REPORT-doc 6 t;""'~""""-->""'C-7--'-'.."O,-, . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Planning Application Number: PA03-0471 Community Commercial Consistent? 1. General Plan Designation: 2. Zoning Designation: SP-5 Consistent? 3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: 0 181 0 181 0 r8J r8J r8J r8J r8J 0 0 General Plan EIR Sensitive Biological Habitat Map Sensitive Archeological Area Map Sensitive Paleontological Area Map Fault Hazard Zone Map Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map 100 Year Flood Map Future Roadway Noise Contour Map Other (Specify) yes yes Previous EIR/N.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation, T.H.E. Soils Co., Inc., June 27,2003 Other: r8J Exempt 0 Mitigated Negative Declaration 0 Negative Declaration 0 EIR 4. Environmental Determination: r8J 10 Day Review 0 20 Day Review 0 30 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: Consistent r8J r8J r8J Inconsistent 0 0 0 land Use Circulation Housing RID 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc 1 Consistent Inconsistent 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 181 181 181 181 181 181 181 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial as/Conservation Growth Management/Public Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development . 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: 181 Site Planninq: A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area character? The proposed building placement is consistent with that of the existing Chaparral Center and is consistent with the Old Town Specific Plan. B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating nuisances and hazards? The proposed project is essentially an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center and is architecturally integrated with the existing building. . C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots to define the street edge? As allowed by the Old Town Specific Plan, the front setback is a feet. Although not required by the Old Town Specific Plan, a parking area is provided at the rear of the building. 181 Parkinq and Circulation: A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily? Although not required by the Old Town Specific Plan, a parking area is provided at the rear of the builiding. Because the Old Town Specific Plan does not require that parking be provided for this type of project, the project does exceed the requirements of the Specific Plan. B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to pedestrians and bicyclists? The parking lot is located at the rear of the building where traffic volume will be low due to the number of parking spaces available and where traffic speed will be low due to the layout and size of the parking are, therebyhere allowing safe and convenient pedestrian and bicycle access. . C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered . Ro\D P\2003\O3-0471 Chaparral Center Expansion\PROJECl' REVIEW WORKSHEET-doc 2 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial from public view? Trash bins to be located within the parking lot area will be screened with a trash enclosure and landscaping (including shrubs and vines). ~ Buildinq Architecture: A. How does the building design proYide articulation of the building mass? The building design includes a variety of rooflines, porches and balconies, siding materials and window sizes to provide articulation of the building mass. B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself? The proposed project is essentially an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center and is architecturally integrated with the existing building. C. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful open space between the buildings and/or the street? As allowed by the Old Town Specific Plan, the building has a foot setbacks for both the front and side. This allows for greater building area and is consistent with the goals of the Specific Plan. The design also lends to the "Old Town" ambiance and creates a more pedestrian friendly atmosphere. D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows, doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials meet the intent of the design guidelines? The architectural elements of the proposed Chaparral Expansion will match those of the exisiting Chaparral Center, thereby meeting the intent of the Specific Plan design guidelines. Plywood siding, which was used on the existing Chaparral Center, will not be allowed as the Specific Plan does not allow for the use of plywood on exterior surfaces visible to the public. t81 Landscapinq: A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? DYes t81 No, why? The Old Town Specific Plan states that shrubs should be a minimum of 5-gallon size at time of planting, but the project proposes ninety-five 1-gallon daylilies. However, 108 5-gallon shrubs will be provided, thereby exceeding the number recommended of shrubs recommended by the Specific Plan by seventy-three. Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Year Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon R:\D 1'.2003\03-0471 Otaparral Center ExpansionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the design guidelines? ~ Yes D No . C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and separate them from the surrounding pavements? The Old Town Specific Plan goals related to landscaping are different than those for other areas within the City. Per the Specific Plan, informal landscape forms should be utilized on major thoroughfares to emphasize the "unplanned" appearance of a rustic early California settlement. The buidlings within Old Town should be prominent, with many architectural elements of the late 1800s/early 1900s. The proposed landscaping does meet the requirements of the Specific Plan in that the landscaping: 1) continues an Old West theme; 2) softens the development; and 3) unifies the area as a pleasant environment for residents and visitors. D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate with of the architecture and landscaping? Decks, balconies, fixtures and railings of the proposed Chaparral Expansion will match those of the existing Chaparral Center, which ties together many elements of the Old Town Western Style architecture, 7. Development Code Consistency: A. How does the plan achieye the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? . Circulation: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the circulation guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan by placing parking at the rear of the building, hidden from public view from Front and Main Streets. Architectural Desiqn: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the architectural style guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan in that the building will be the Old Town Western Style, incorporating western style elements recommended by the Specific Plan such as vertical and horizontal wood siding, narrow wood porches, significant wall articulation devices (porches, overhangs), false roof parapets, simple color scheme (matching the existing Chaparral Center), traditional commercial storfron window, balconies with balustrade, exterior stairway (wood), and knee bracing at posts and balconies. . R,ID P\2003\O3-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionIPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc 4 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Site Plannina and Desian: Section 17.08,070 does not apply. With the exception of the proposed building height of 44' 10' and three stories, the project complies with the site planning guidelines of the Old Town Specific Plan in that the buildings are side by side, forming a fairly continuous street wall, and are not set back from the boardwalk. The pedestrian quality of this relationship is enhanced by the lack of emphasis on parking lots and parked cars. As per the intent of the site planning guidelines, parking is provided at the rear of the site to intesify the pedestrian activity which charaterizes this area. The Specific Plan does have provisions to allow for City Council approval of increased building height. Compatibility: Section 17.08.070 does not apply. The project complies with the land use regulations of the Old Town Specific Plan in that in the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district, retail development is permitted. Furthermore, the proposed Chaparral Expansion is essentially an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center building, which contains uses similar to those anticipated for the proposed project. B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? D Yes, with conditions ~ No The Old Town Specific Plan limits building height to 28' and two stories and the proposed building is 44' 10" and three stories. However, the Specific Plan does have provisions to allow for City Council approval of increased building height. Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 15,450 12,551 sq. ft. 71.5 32.3% ~.D¡¡¡m¡!lliI~~~~~¡¡j~! Hillside/Slope ml_! Traffic R,\Ð 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Centcr ExpansionlPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET,doc 5 Arch./Paleo Fault Zone Flood Noise PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Habitat Subs./Liqfctn Stream/Creek Air Quality ",~_TnaJJiI " Ek," North Retail SP-5 TRC) Communi v Commercial East Retail/Restaurant SP-5 TRC/CC) Communi v Commercial West Open Space SP-5 TRC/OS) Communi y CommerciaVOS South Retail SP-5 TRC) Communi y Commercial R:\D P\2003\O3"0471 Chaparral Center ExpansioolPROIECT REVIEW WORKSHEET-doc 6 8 8 8 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:ID P\2003\O3-O471 Chapanal Center ExpansionIST AFF REPORT,doc 7 '_--,--+----ò-",-,--"-,,,,~.-.,,-;";;C;::- "'~'-'- _d-""'?4""Ú""..:-"~,,-õ;;;;'-="-,, . . Vicinity Map . . Site Plan 1------=----- ï-' I EXIST, 6" ............ ------~::':..~-~ ----- ~ =-~,- - i I I I EXIST. DRlve~'I' i~ PAAlQN6 !.OT 0 10' ;:¡O' bO' 100' t-I I \ 1- ~C£~RTH ~11I1I1II11II1I1I11II1I1I11I"1I1II1I1I1II11I1II11I1I11I1I11I1I1I11I1I11I1II1II1I11I1I1II1I1I1I1I1I11i11111111111111111111111111 . . . . ~ 0 0 ~ ~ § 0 0 . ., 0 ~ .3 ] ~ ;¡? ¡. /U ~h ~'I'!ï ¡¡!I;¡ ~~ ~ :r ¡¡ s <> ~ i:; ~i s <> ~ " " " " " ':;, " " " " :: " )J 9 2 ~ 9 .. ~ .I:IIh< .<1-" .t>-,Oj .<1/LOI-." .<1"",1.1. .t>-,Oj .M(>-J. ~ I ,9/Ç <-,OJ .z!'<I-" ~ 0 0 ,.....-4 ~ ""0 ~ 0 C) (1) r/l ! 1¡ -=====================================~========--- , " " ---, n ",-inm .i """"""""""...."~""""""""".."..""~"""~""""~;:~: 'I J :: / - // ' ::-----------------.0;" ik/---- / :,," " ' ------__0-- ,/:n "" I:'"~ . "i'::'::t-;~;t.~......"J """" /1t"- ' " / ' " " //// / \ ---" \ :i /' ¡ ", ", " / ,\ -"\:' /",," / \ ,) ,/ : ", ", " \ ," ( : ", ", ! \ : 1 ", , ' , ~ 3 .. ,g Õ -E. 8 ."',", ,I.-", ."',9 II i~~ ~~~ Ii 8 ~ ., R r¡. '" ~ :r 9 8 . I TM< """ ""~ ~ y " g :,¡ J¡ Õ -& ~ ~ :I 0 0 ~ ~ ! -' " ~ .~ ,..0 ~ . ,<1101-.9 .<II!ò ¡-," .M""" .s..... ~ 0 .~ ~ > (]) ,..-...j ~ . ~ rf1 ~ 0 ~ ~ 1 .:160-,.' r .016""'" 1 .OIL<-,6I ft. ---'-l-- - ¡ i : : I I I , I I I I , , I , , I I , I I , , ~ . . . ~ " ~ . . . ~ 0 .~ 1d ;> Q.) ~ ~ ~ 0 z 0 0 .~ ~ ;> Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) ~ u t ¡¡ 1;\ . . B B B ~ . . . . JJiU I~J , I I ----'---¡----=SHlX1s--1 ,,! i v.~----~------- ~------'-! i i ¡' i I ¡ i ¡ ~i ! ! ¡ ~' ¡ i i g! : i: §! Ii I i I ~ Ii ii~ ! ' J I :. ¡I~-JT' ! : ! I ! ¡ i ¡ ! ¡ i i :---Lj I ' ¡ ~ I' ¡~ ¡ I 1!li I > I" I! Ii:! I!! ,I!! Iii «II:I,!II>! ~ '10' ,I, ~¡¡" . , Z 0 ' ~. ! r----- o..i:!d g~' ~ ',' '0, ,. ~~. II i ~',¡ g¡'! ~'U I w~ < ~ ~i ~:; « 'í ~ 'I - u~ ~ ~~m¡¡d~ t[ ~ð~r¡;~~ 5:m~~F 51 ~zð~ßw- !!i: ~~ :i~;;;~;: ~ :;;~~~~~í n. ~~h;g~ ~r~~8q , ~ m II b ¡ ¡ î , B! ¡ ¡¡!!!!!!! ¡ i! ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ! ~ ! "" ",.. . ! ~ ~ ~ !!!!! ! ~ . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- R:ID 1'\2003\03-0471 OIaparral Center ExpansionlSTAFF REPORT. doc 8 . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0471 , A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 12,551 SQUARE FOOT COMMERCIAL BUILDING ON 0.40 ACRES LOCATED AT 28461 OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET, APPROXIMATELY 150 NORTH OF 6th STREET, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 922- 026-022. WHEREAS, Matthew Fagan filed Planning Application No. PA03-0471 (Development Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; . WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on February 4, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinqs The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code: . A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the General Plan land use policies for Community Commercial (CC) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the Tourist Retail Core (TRC) land use district of the Old Town Specific Plan with the exception of the proposed building height, for which Section 1II.F.8 of the Specific Plan allows. for City Council approval of increased building heights. The proposed increase to the building height limitations and number of stories are justified because the proposed building provides additional retail and office space in Old Town and provides architectural R:ID 1'\2003\03-0471 Chap.mil Center ExpansinnIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 1 features that are appropriate to the site and that match the existing Chaparral Center including generous porch and balcony areas and varying rooflines that visually tie the proposed building to the existing three-story and 47 foot tall Chaparral center, resulting in a desirable addition to Old Town Front Street. . A commercial building and uses are typical land uses found in the Community Commercial land use designation within the General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The proposed commercial use is compatible with the surrounding commercial buildings currently located adjacent to the proposed site. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the building meets the architectural requirements as stated in the Site Development Standards of the Old Town Specific Plan. The proposed building architecture and building materials have been found to be compatible with the adjacent buildings. The varying building shapes and offsets provided serve to break up the massing of the building. The proposed architecture complements and enhances the visual character along Old Town Front Street and will be a welcome addition to the existing buildings. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. . Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct, operate and establish a 12,551 square foot three-story commercial building with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. . R,\D N003\O3-O471 Chaparral Center ExpansionIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 2 . . . Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 4th day of February 2004. ATTEST: John Telesio, Chairperson Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of February 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:ID 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 3 . . . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:ID 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Center Expansion\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA03-0471 (Development Plan) A Development Plan to construct a 12,551 square foot commercial building on 0.40 acres located at 28461 Old Town Front Street, generally located on the west side of Old Town Front Street, approximately 150 feet north of 6th Street. DIF Category: Retail Commercial/Service CommerciaVOffice Assessor's Parcel No.: 922-026-022 Approval Date: February 4, 2004 February 4, 2006 Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the R:ID P\2003\O3-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 5 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. . Final approval of this development plan is contingent upon City Council approval of the proposed building height of 44 feet 10 inches and three stories. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or reyisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approyal date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approyal within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one- year extensions of time, one year at a time. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits B (Site Plan), C (Grading Plan), D (Building Eleyation), E (Floor Plan), and F (Landscape Plan) contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. . All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the surrounding parapet wall. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. 11. 12. All downspouts shall be internalized. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. 13. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeologicaVcultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discoyered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the . R,ID 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Center Expansion\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 6 . . . 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures haye been approved by the Director of Planning. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be proYided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. A separate permit shall be required for any window awnings. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Deyelopment Plan. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 19. 20. 21. 22. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 23. 24. 25. A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Exhibit "P', or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be R:ID 1'12003\03-0471 ChapaITal Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 7 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approyed maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. . b. c. d. e. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. . The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the project, which shall consist of masonry walls and metal or wood doors, a trellis structure oyer the top of the enclosure, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". Prior to Release of Power 31. 32. 33. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approyed by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. Prior to release of power, all site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. . R:\D 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Center Expansioo\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 8 . . . DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS General Requirements 34. 35. 36. 37. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. a. Street Improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb & gutter, sidewalks. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and R,\Ð 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 9 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. mitigate any impacts. . The Developer shall collect the surface run-off in a catch basin and filter or equivalent drainage system prior to draining into Murrieta Creek. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property, Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. . The site is in an area identified on the Flood Insurance Rate Map as Flood Zone A. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code which may include obtaining a Letter of Map Revision from FEMA. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for reyiew and approyal. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 50. 51. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: a. Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance with City Standard No. 401 or as approved by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. . R,\D NOO3\O3-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansioolPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 10 . . . 52. 53. 54. 55. The Developer shall submit a Parcel Merger for approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works, The Developer shall obtain a reciprocal easement for ingress, egress and parking over the adjacent property. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Deyelopment Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the T emecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 56. 57. 58. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Deyeloper shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works c. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 59. 60. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A- 1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 61. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination R,ID 1'12003\03-047 ¡ O1aparral Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 11 62. 63. 64. 65. 66. 67. 68. of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be ayailable from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) . As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approyed route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants ARE NOT required. (CFC 903.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC see 902) Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which haye not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2,2.4) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Preyention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an indiyiduallot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) . Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi- family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire . R,ID 1'\2003\03-0471 Chaparral Center Expansinn\PC RESOLIIT10N AND COAdnc 12 . . . 69. 70. Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser door. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 71. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) COMMUNITY SERVICES 72. General Conditions 73. 74. 75. The developer shall provide a trash enclosure area large enough to accommodate two (2) bins, one for recycling and one for solid waste. All perimeter landscaping, fencing and on-site lighting within this development shall be maintained by the property owner or a private maintenance association. The deyeloper shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 76. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. BUILDING AND SAFETY 77. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project R:ID 1'12003\03-0471 Chaparral Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 13 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. 83. 84. 85. 86. 87. 88. 89. 90. will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. . Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of- way. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998) Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systems. Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. . Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and mechanical plan for plan review. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-25, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays . R:\D 1'12003\03-0471 ChapauaJ Center ExpansinnIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdnc 14 . . . OUTSIDE AGENCIES 91. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated October 6, 2003, from the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District. 92. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated September 3, 2003, from Rancho Water. 93. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated August 27, 2003, from County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approyal and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Name Printed R,ID 1'.2003\03-0471 Chapanal Center ExpansionlPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 15 ðA.. COu,'IIY OF RIVERSIDE . COMMu,~I1Y HEALTIi AGENCY ~Ia ~ DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH . August 27,2003 City of Temecula Planning Department P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Attention: Stuart Fisk RE: Plot Plan No. PA03-0471 Dear MI. Fisk: The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. P A03-047, to construct a 12,000 sq. ft building and we have no objections. Sanitary sewer and water services are available in this area. 1. PRIOR TO ANY BUIWING PLAN CHECK APPROVAL for Environmental Health clearance, the following items are required: a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering agencies. . b) Three complete sets of plans for each food establishment (to include vending machines) will be submitted, including a fixture schedule, a fmish schedule, and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the California Unifonn Retail Food Facilities Law. For specific reference, please contact Food Facility Plan examiners at (909) 600-6330). c) A clearance letter from the Hazardous Services Materials Management Branch (909) 358-5055 will be required indicating that the project has been cleared for: . Underground storage tanks, Ordinance #617.4. . Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance #615.3. . Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance #651.2. . Waste Reduction Management Sincerely, ~\ ~"'""'""""' Hoilih Sp<o;'¡'" (909) 955-8980 Ii) U \WIJ , ~~AUG:9~ ~ NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance. . . cc: Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials Local Enforcement Agency' 1'0. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502.1280 . (909) 955-8982 . FAX 1909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor. Riverside, CA 92501 Land Use and Water Engineering' 1'0. Bo,1206, River;ide, CA 92502.1206 . 1909)955-8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Roor. River;ide, CA 92501 (@ Rancho '* Boan! "ro;""",~ Job. E. Hoagland &- V;uP>u;d~' Step"" J. C=.o Rolpb IL DaD, Be. R. Dn>b ""'D.H~ c.... F. Kn 0"""', PbllUpl.Fo- Inlerim Genen>l Mana.... Di""""oCF;~-"'~ E.F. "Bob" ........ Di""""oCEng;.""¡.. Ken."" C. Dealy Di""",oCOpen"nna "Molnle...... Fe,.,.,. R.""'" ConI.",I1~ September 3, 2003 Stuart Fisk, Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY A PORTION OF LOTS NO. 12 AND NO. 13 OF MAP BOOK 15, PAGE 726 APN 922-026-022 Dear Mr. Fisk: Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service, therefore, would be available upon completion of financial arrangements between RCWD and the property.owner. LI.... M. F....... D;mkts.a.....,./Admlnl"'o"" Se,.;~ M.......,. If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees and :;::'::'e1"~~rU.F requirements. Gen.nl Con_I Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RÇWD. If you have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services Representative at this office. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT /~~~ Steve Brannon, P.E. Devèlopment Engineering Manager 1 \!J Œ ¡ f¡\ n' W SEt' ; 4 2003 : 03\SB:mcO38IFO 12- T6IFCF ßy._-=c._----" Rancho CoIUo"'" Wo"" DIotrkl 42135WI""'~"""'d ° P""OffiuBo,OO17 ° T......,lo"",lIfo....92589-0017 ° (909)296-6900 ° FAX (909)- WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE. CA 92501 909.955.1200 909.788,9965 FAX . . . I"F':-)~ ijèu ¡c'-ñ [1{1 r~-¡-",\¡ ~ ~ H!Ìi¡-"'-'JL;Ü\~if~ini' ~ ./" If', - -- --¡!II! eo" ", I,' II' ,,' OCT 1 3 ZO03 ¡ Ii .11 'I!YAt\'~ ,I:, ,,--1 !iJu Rl\irERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL I. - IBy _m______-----À@ WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT ------, October 6, 2003 84761 CitY ofTemecula Planning Department Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attention: Stuart Fisk Ladies and Gentlemen: Chaparral Center PA03-0471 Re: The District does not usually review land divisionslland use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters/flood hazard reports for projects that are located within incorporated Cities, Exceptions are made for cases with items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety or any other such issues. PA03-047l is aproposal to construct a 12,309 square fèet bu¡¡di~g on a O.I-ilCre site located at 28461 Old Town Front Street in the citY of Temecula. The entire site is located within the Zone AE boundary as delineated on Panel No. 0607420010B of the Flood Insurance Rate Maps issued in conjunction with the National Flood Insurance Program, administered by the' Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). The US Army Corps of Engineers completed a Murrieta Creek Flood Control Feasibility Study on September 2000. Based on information obtained from the feasibility study, the water sUrface elevation for the ultimate flow rate of37,800c¡jbic feet per second islOO&r feet (National Geodetic Vertical Datum 1929). New buildings should be floodproofed by elevating the finished floor a minimum of 12 inches above the water surface elevation for the ultimate flow rate of 37,800 cfs as determined in the Murrieta Creek Flood Control Feasibility Study. Due to the extreme hazard posed by Murrieta Creek, the City should consider not allowing the development to proceed adjacent to the Creek until the ultimate improvements can be constructed, Property within the floodplain should be conditioned to construct the required improvements or participate in a financing mechanism such as an assessment district to ensure necessary improvements are constructed. If the City chooses to allow development to proceed, we recommend that the City should condition the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other pertinent information as needed to meet FEMA requirements. 84761 City ofTemecula Re: Chaparral Center PA03-0471 -2- October 6, 2003 . The project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek!remecula Valley Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted; applicable fees should be paid for by cashier's check or money order written to Flood Control District prior to the issuance of building or grading pennits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual pennit. The following infonnation of a general nature is provided herewith for your use: This project may need to obtain an applicable National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) pennit coverage trom the State Water Resources Control Board or the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) - San Diego Region. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other fmal approval should not be given until the City has detennined that the project has been granted a pennit or is shown to be exempt. . If the mapped flood plain is impacted by the project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement trom the California Department ofFish and Game and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Pennit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence trom these agencies indicating the project is exempt trom these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required trom the RWQCB - San Diego Region prior to issuance of the Corps 404 pennit. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please feel tree to contact Teresa Tung at 909.955.4050, Very truly yours, . ~¿~ STEPHEN C. THOMAS Senior Civil Engineer TT:lib:slj .