The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About030304 PC Agenda ~ In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to . . participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MARCH 3, 2004 - 6:00 P.M. ........ CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: RollCall: Commissioner Guerriero Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that am not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item .!!2! on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other a!~enda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary QJ]Qr to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAli NOTICE TO THE PUBI.IC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific Items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDA TJON: 1.1 Approve the AgEmda of March 3, 2004 R : \P LAN COM MIA 9 end es \2004 102 .Q3.04. doc 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: . 2.1 Approve the Minutes of February 4, 2004 3 Director's Hearina Case Update RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for February 2004 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. New Items 4 PlanninG Application No. PA01-0605 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 103-unit self storaae facilitY totalina 29.780 square feet with 64 outdoor recreational vehicle spaces on a 173.440 square foot lot. located alone the south side of Overland Drive and east of Commerce Center Drive. Rick Rush. Associate Planner . 5 PlanninG Application No. PAO3-0551. submitted by Shea Homes. is a Product Review for 99 detached sinQle-familv residences within Plannina Area 3 of the RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan. located south of Murrieta Hot SprinGs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield StaGe Road (Tract 29661-3\. Dan LonQ. Associate Planner COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: March 17, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 . R: \P LAN co M MIA ge nd a s \20 04 \O3.Q3 -04. doc . ITEM #2 . . . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 4,2004 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, February 4, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Olhasso le,d the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Olhasso, Chiniaeff, and Chairman Telesio. Absent: Guerriero and Mathewson. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDA TIOI\I: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of February 4, 2004. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of December 17, 2003. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Guerriero and Mathewsol1 who were absent. R:\MinutesPC\O20404 COMMISSION BUSINESS . New Items 3 PlanninG Application No. PA03-0471 a Development Plan to construct a 12,551 square foot buildina on 0.40 acres located at 28461 Old Town Front Street. aenerallv located on the west side of Old Town Front Street. approximatelv 150 feet north of 6th Street Assistant Planner Fisk presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . That the proposed building will be adjacent to the existing Chaparral Center; that visually the building will look like an expansion of the existing Chaparral Center; . That there will be no setbacks between the buildings; that building setbacks either meet or exceed minimum requirements of the Specific Plan (SP) and that the proposed 71.5% lot coverage will be below maximum permitted lot coverage of 100%; . That although the Specific Plan does not require parking spaces, a total of seven (7) spaces will be provided; That the proposed site will provide adequate circulation; That the architecture for the proposed building will be Old Town western style; that the building will incorporate architectural features from the existing Chaparral Center including expansive porch and balcony areas, knee braces at posts, wood sash windows, vertical board and batten siding, and wood lap siding; . . That exterior colors will match those of the existing Chaparral Center; . That the landscape plans will conform to the landscape requirements of the Old Town Specific Plan; That the project conforms to all the development regulations of the Old Town Specific Plan with the exception of the proposed building height and number of stories; however, because the Old Town Specific Plan does allow City Council to approve increases to the limitations on building height and number of stories, the project will be conditioned that final approval of the development plan will be contingent upon City Council approval; . That architecture proposed for the building will meet architectural requirements as stated in the Site Development Standards of the Old Town Specific Plan; . That the memo from Public Works addressed the applicant's concerns. For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Assistant Planner Fisk noted that the proposed project will be consistent with the City's General Plan, Old Town Specific Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. . R:\MinutesPC\O20404 2 . . . Mr. Mathew Fagan, 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera, representing RCM Capital Partners, LLC, requested that Condition of Approval Nos. 47 (be deleted), and 49 and 52 be modified. For Mr, Fagan, Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that Condition of Approval No. 47 has been deleted; No. 49 has been modified to read: the site is in an area identified on the Floor Insurance Rate as Flood Zone A. This project shall comply with Chapter 15, Section 15.12 of the City Municipal Code. A Flood Plain Development Permit shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval; Condition of Approval No. 52 should read: the Developer shall submit one of the following for approval, a Parcel Merger, a Parcel Map, or other mechanism a approved the Director of Public Works. With regard to Condition of Approval No. 11, Mr. Fagan noted that the applicant requested the use downspouts as externalized architecture elements. Also relaying for Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Fagan noted that both Mr. McMillan and Mr. Alan have met with the property owners to the north in November. Assistant Planner Fisk, pe!r PowerPoint presentation, displayed examples of downspouts on the exterior side of a building. Mr. Walt Allen, 28441 Rancho California Road, architect, relayed the following: . That the downspouts have been used in the past; . That the applicant would request to have the option of using downspouts; . That the applicant would request to have Condition of Approval No. 11 deleted; . That the applicant met with the neighbors to the north in November and that they are unable to work together in regard to the proposed project due to the time frame of the project and that the applicant must move forward due to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). For Commissioner Chinia,eff, Mr. Allen stated that if the applicant chooses to use exterior downspouts, the applicant will return to the Planning Commission for approval of the architectural design. In response to Commissioner Olhasso's query regarding timing on TUMF, Planning Director Ubnoske relayed that the deadline is July 1, 2004. Mr. Ed Dool, 28464 Old Town Front Street, owner of Temecula Stage Stop, expressed excitement with the proposed project stating that this project will tremendously enhance Old Town. Mr. Chris Giapapas, 32245 Callesito Fadrigo, property owner north of the proposed project stated that he would respøctfully request a continuation of the proposed project, also stating that the proposed project will significantly devalue his property. At this time, the Public He'aring was closed. R:\MinutesPC\020404 3 Planning Director Ubnoske relayed that every proposed development in the City is handled on a case-by-case basis. Commissioner Chiniaeff echoed Planning Director Ubnoske's comments. Commissioner Olhasso expressed excitement and stated that she would be in support of the proposed project. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the conditions deleting Condition of Approval No. 47, modifying Nos. 49, 52, and 11 as previously noted (that if the applicant were to use downspouts on the exterior of the building, staff approval would be required). Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Guerriero and Mathewson who were absent. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS No Commission reports at this time. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT No Planning Director's reports at this time. ADJOURNMENT At 6:25 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reaular meetina to be held on Wednesday. February 18. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning John Telesio Chairman R:\MinutesPC\O20404 4 . . . . ITEM #3 . . . TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM Planning Commission Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning March 3, 2004 Director's Hearing Case Update Planning Director's Agenda items for February 2004 February 12, 2004 February 19, 2004 February 19, 2004 Attachments: 1. PA03-0501 A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 6 lots totaling 9.25 acres into six (6) commercial lots with a minimum lot size of .93 acres, located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearney Road A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a Budget Car Rental in an existing 22,211 square foot building, located at 40605 Winchester Road A Product Review for 79 detached single- family residential homes with three different floor plans and three architectural designs within VTM 25004, located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, east of Seraphina Road, and north of Nicholas Road PA03-0673 PA03-0531 Action Agendas - I3lue Page 2 . P: IPLANN IN G\D IRHEAR \MEM 0\2 004\02-2004. doc Jack Tarr Approved Diversified Investments Jennifer Approved Neilson Peter Bilicki Approved . . . p, IPLANN IN GID IRHEAR \MEM 0\200 4102-2004. doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 ACTION AGENDAS . . . ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 12, 20041:30 PM TEIMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1: Project Number: Project Title: Applicant: Location: PA03-0501 Tentative Parcel Map Jack Tarr, Diversified Investments Located on the northwest corner of Margarita Road and North General Kearny Road. A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide 6 lots totaling 9.25 acres into six (6) commercial lots with a minimum lot size of .93 acres. Exempt 910-130-87,88,89,90,92 and 96 Dan Long APPROVED Proposal: Environmental Action: APN: Project Planner: ACTION: P,IPLANNINGlDffiHEARlAgendas\2004\02-12-04 Acdon Agenda.doc 1 . . . ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 19, 20041:30 PM TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 CALL TO ORDER: Dave Hogan, Principal Planner PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner on items that are, not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state vour name and address. Item No.1: Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: Environmental Action: APN: Project Planner: ACTION: Item No.2 Project Number: Project Type: Project Title: Applicant: Project Description: Location: PA03-0673 Minor Conditional Use Permit Budget Rent A Car Jennifer Neilson A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a Budget Car rental in an existing 22,211 square foot building 40605 Winchester Road Notice of Exemption per Califomia Environmental Quality Act, Article 19 Categorical Exemptions, Section 15332, Class 32 In-Fill Development Projects 910-290-009 Rick Rush APPROVED PA03-0531 Home Product Review CRV Temecula Estates Peter Bilicki, 200 East Washington Avenue, #100, Escondido, CA 92025 A Product Review for 79 detached single-family residential homes with three different floor plans and three architectural designs within VTM 25004 South of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, east of Serephina Road, and north of Nicholas Road C:\Documents and SettingsICyntbia.Lariccia\Lncal SettingslTemponuy Internet FilesIOLK2D\02-19-04 Action Agenda1.doc 1 Environmental Action: Determination of Consistency with a project for which a Negative Declaration was previously adopted (Sec. 15162-Subsequent EIRS and Negative Declarations) Rick Rush APPROVED Project Planner: ACTION: C,IDocuments and SettingslCynthia.Lariccia\Local SettingslTernpcrary Internet FilesI0LK2D\02-19-04 Action Agendal.doc 2 . . . . ITEM #4 . . . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: File Number STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION March 3, 2004 Rick Hush Title: Associate Planner PA01-0605 Application Type: CUP/Development Plan Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 103 unit self storage facility totaling 29,780 square feet with 64 outdoor Recreational Vehicle spaces on a 173,440 square foot lot, located along the south side of Overland Drive and east of Commerce Center Drive. [8 Approve with Conditions D Deny 0 Continue for Redesign D Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial [8 Categorically Exempt (Class) 15332 D Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R,IC U 1'12001101-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylST AFF REPORT.doc I PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: Kenneth High and Thomas Pecht Completion Date: December 26, 2003 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: June 26, 2004 General Plan Designation: Service CommerciaVBusiness Park Zoning Designation: Service CommerciaVLight Industrial Site/Surrounding land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Commercial Auto Repair Industrial Mini Storage Lot Area: 173,440 Square Feet Total Floor Area/Ratio: 29,780 Square Feet . Landscape Area/Coverage: 10.9% Site and 25.5% Channel Area Parking Required/Provided: 5 Required/ 5 Provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY 1:8]1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. (or) 01. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, and the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan. 1:8]2. (or) 02. The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval. . R\C U P\200I\Ol-0605 Overland Self Stomge FacilityISTAFFREPORT.dnc 2 . . . ANALYSIS The proposed project is a request for a mini storage/recreational vehicle storage use to be located on two separate parcels. Both parcels have different General Plan and zoning designations and take access from two different streets. Parcel one fronts onto Overland Drive and has a General Plan and zoning designation of Service Commercial. Parcel two has 25-feet of frontage onto Commerce Center Drive. The General Plan designation and zoning for parcel two is Business Park and Light Industrial. Ingress to the site will be taken from the 25-foot access point along Commerce Center and egress from the site will be onto Overland Drive. The Development Code states that all projects providing recreational vehicle storage spaces within the Service Commercial zoning district shall apply for Conditional Use Permit. The 103 unit self storage buildings to be located on the site would not require a Conditional Use Permit. The Staff, upon review of the proposed Conditional Use Permit application, can make the required findings and røcommends approval. The proposed recreational vehicle storage lot will be completely surrounding by buildings and will not be visible from the public view. The proposed site plslnning and circulation is consistent with the commercial development performance standards in the Development Code. The proposed site plan has eliminated any conflicts between pedestrian and vehicular traffic. The loading and unloading areas have been located to the rear of the buildings and will not be visible from the public right of way. The drive aisles provided are a rninimum twenty-six feet wide, which take into account the large moving vans and recreational vehicles that will be utilizing this site on a daily basis. The proposed building design is consistent with the architectural design of the Development Code and the architectural elements in the City-Wide Design Guidelines. Providing offsets along the front elevation has broken up the mass and bulk of the proposed building. The tower elements along the front elevation further serves to break up the mass of the building. It also meets the intent of the Community Design Element of the General Plan, by screening the vehicle storage from view of the public right of way. Metal vine trellises have been located along the front elevation, which further breaks up this elevation. The colors and materials serve to compliment the design theme for the building. The proposed landscaping not only exceeds the minimum requirements of the Development Code it also complements the architectural design theme. The large landscape areas that are provided along Overlal1d Drive are planted with varying trees, shrubs and ground cover that create visual interest from the public right of way. Staff has reviewed the proposed project and has determined that the project will be a welcome addition to the surrounding area. The required findings for approval of the Development Plan can be made to construct the proposed buildings. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ~1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class 15332, In-Fill) (or) RolC U NOOIIOI-060S Overland Self Storage FacilitylSTAFF REPORT.doc 3 01. (or) 01. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). . An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. CONCLUSIONIRECOMM ENDA TION Staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Design Guidelines and conforms to all of the applicable development regulations for mini storage facilities. Staff recommends approval of the Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan with the attached findings and conditions of approval. FINDINGS Conditional Use Permit (17.04.010E) 1. 2. 3. 4. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed self-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility is consistent with the Land Use Element of the general plan. The proposed self-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility meets the purpose and intent of a conditional use permit as defined in Section 17.04.010A of the development code. . The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the general plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be a complimentary addition to the area. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the development code requirements for a self-storage and recreational facility and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. . Ro\C U NOO\\O\-060S Overland Self Storage Faciliry\STAFF REPORT.doc 4 . . . Staff has reviewed the proposed self-storage and recreational facility and found that it in no way will be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Ingress and egress to the site have been located in a safe location and will not impede or affect traffic flow along either Overland Drive or Commerce Center Drive. Fire Prevention has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be adequately seNed by the Fire Department in an emergency situation. 5. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Director of Planning. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. Development Plan (17.05.01 OF) 1. The proposed LIse is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for SeNice Commercial (SC) and Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the SeNice Commercial (SC) and Light Industrial (LI) zoning districts in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed self-storage buildings. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and genoral welfare. The architecture proposed for the self-storage buildings are consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 6 2. Plan Reductions -- Blue Page 7 PC Resolution Ncl. 2004-- - Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 3. R:\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland S,Jf Storage FacilitylSTAFFREPORT.doc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET R:\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland SelrStcrage Facility\STAFF REPORT.doc 6 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Planning Application Number: PA01-0605 SC/BP Consistent? Yes 1. General Plan Designation: 2. Zoning Designation: 3. SC/L! Consistent? Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination: D D D 4. [8J [8J [8J [8J [8J [8J [8J [8J D Gene¡ral Plan EIR Sensitive Biological Habitat Map Sensitive Archeological Area Map Sensitive Paleontological Area Map Fault Hazard Zone Map Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map 100 Year Flood Map Future Roadway Noise Contour Map Other (Specify) Yes Previous EIR/N.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date): Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): Other: Environmental Det'3rmination: [8J Exempt D Mitigated Negative Declaration D Negative Declaration D EIR [8J 10 Day Revie,w D 20 Day Review D 30 Day Review 5. General Plan Goals Consistency: Consistent [8J [8J [8J Incol1sistent D D D Land Use Circulation Housing R,\C U P\2001\OI-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 1 Consistent ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Inconsistent D D D D D D D PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial OS/Conservation Growth Management/Public Facilities Public Safety Noise Air Quality Community Design Economic Development . 6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency: ~ ¡g¡ Site Plannina: A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area character? Only one of the proposed buildings will be visible from the public view. This building has been setback 25 feet from the ultimate right of way for Overland Drive. The remainder of the buildings have been placed on site as to not be visible from the public view. B. How do the structures interface with adjoining properties to avoid creating nuisances and hazards? . The proposed project is situated on two adjoining parcels. One parcel has access from Overland Drive and the other from Commerce Center Drive. The proposed project will be surrounding by existing buildings. C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots to define the street edge? As proposed the parking and vehicle storage for the project will not be visible from the publics view. The building fronting onto Overland Drive and the entrance gate will provide a screen into this area. Parkina and Circulation: A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily? The proposed storage facility will has proposed to use the access point off of Commerce Center as the ingress to the site and Overland as the egress to the site. Access to the site will be through a security gate and only costumers will be given the gate code. The circulation for the site has been designed to allow for large recreational vehicles and moving trucks to maneuver through site. . R:\C U 1'12001\01-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 2 . . . 18] PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to pedestrians and bicyclists? Tho proposed storage use by nature will not be used by either pedestrians or /Jicyclists. c. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered from public view? All service facilities as well as the parking lot will be screened via the buiJding located adjacent to Overland Drive. Buildina Architecture: A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass? The' building design provides articulation by providing a varied foot print, breaks in the roofline and breaks in the horizontal plane. The two tower elements serve to project out from the building and above the roofline to bre.3k up the building mass. B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent with all buildings in a complex, and on all elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity within itself? As previously stated only one of the buildings will be visible from the public view. This building will employ similar elements as the buildings located to the east, such as Spanish tiled roofs, arches and columns. c. How does the placement of buildings create a more functional or useful open space between the buildings and/or the street? By setting the building back 25-feet from the ultimate right of way a gen'3rous amount of landscaping will be present. Within this landscaping area the applicant is proposing berrning. D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows, doors and openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, and finish materials meet the intent of the design guidelines? The design guidelines indicate specific elements of buildings to be considered desirable and elements that are considered undesirable. Articulation being provided such as projecting columns, tower elements, and cornice bands are considered to be desirable. As well as the multi planned and pitched roofs. R:IC U 1'\2001101-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEETdoc 3 PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial [8J Landscapina: . A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings? [8J Yes 0 No, why? Trees 10% 36" Box 30% 24" Box 60% 15 Gallon Groundcover 100% Coverage In One Year Shrubs 100% 5 Gallon B. Does the landscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the design guidelines? [8J Yes 0 No C. How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and separate them from the surrounding pavements? Due to the nature of the proposed use no internal site landscaping is required. All landscaping for the site is being provided around the perimeter. D. How does the patio and street' furniture, fixtures, walls and fences integrate with of the architecture and landscaping? . The walls and fences serve to tie into the proposed building and break up the public view into the storage area. 7. Development Code Consistency: A. How does the plan achieve the performance standards specified in Code Section 17.08.070? Circulation: Vehicular circulation has been designed to have ingress and egress from separate areas. Ingress to the site will be taken from Commerce Center and egress will be taken from Overland Drive. Architectural Desian: The proposed architectural design is consistent with the surrounding buildings. The building footprint has been designed with jogs that serve to break up the massing of the building. . R,\C U P\2001\01-O605 Ovedand Self Storage Facility\PROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 4 . . . PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET Development Plan Commercial Site, Plannina and Desian: The> proposed project is to be sited on the site as to screen the storage areas. Cornpatibilitv: The' proposed project is compatible with the surrounding buildings as .J2!!!}/iously stated in the work sheet. B. Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the applicable minimum development standards? 1:8:1 Yes, with conditions [] No Net Lot Area: Total Floor Area: Floor Area Ratio: Lot Coverage: 17'3,440 square feet 29',780 .17 17% Traffic Habitat Subs./Liqfctn Stream/Creek Air Quality II$m~i~§D m'mèi~¡;iD;¡t North Commercial Communitv Commercial Community Commercial East Industrial Llaht Industrial Business Park West Mini Storaae Service Commercial Service Commercial South Car Repair Service Commercial Service Commercial RIC U 1'\2001101-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylPROJECf REVIEW WORKSHEET.doc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 PLAN REDUCTIONS R,IC U 1'\2001101-0605 Overland Se.~ Storage FacilitylST AFF REPORTdcc 7 , I 8 \,l\", Q\~\ ~~ (~-:\! '1ì\~í:;: \:::h \ "\:~~~ \ U.u \ï',~~-@ if ~l------. . t-, "'d!:~V~j. f \ "(Z- n¿Q T=';r:-:L,~;J',~,',.Q,~u_~c':~tJ~,,2-,-- r~~~~ ~~r ;.;;~- ~ '- 'if ~~?,~: i'i:\V~l ~!I¡illi¡.,:,i~:";,¡I,.i,,' ! : 1 - - - - - - -tl~ : ~ili\~~ L~[ 1I"~)i. LI ,,"jl'--il!}k ,Ij',,----- b . ~-,',i\N('I'\J.L I :'-';Q£.,~" ,~r='" ,/ 1 ¡ ,"':'11,1," " "III~¡f.:I' I~, :'v ' ' ¡ ...¡',I _II I' , 'sl+,;1ì-1 I J. t \.")t ',Ii:", :~ ,1,~@ 'I Ii '~' ,i,~~1111 ~~; i <êjiJ' l.. ,~\\'bj,~, _. ,~jj-------_.=~'-~' - B~~~~ i Ir\~~r ! ~~'~~~' 11\4 --- --- "'., \ , ~ "Ii i,I~" I,"', , ' I ',i ¡~ ¡ ~'~~ ¡ ~~;f!l~:Y] .. 'l~ ¡ ,~~:!--~_.1[iJ~~"Ir;.. ~~, :r' ',1'7 ' ' :/"" -'~- / , ""'\"" \ , I -- - " '\ ¡ it, ~:..- ~~\ ~~ -:.'\',:,,:.~~ : \ ¡~To -i----~':==--'~í!i~~~~:",- ~M" ~: ,I",: -- """",~,"':~~'--:!."": U1,' I . - I 1.:'7-1 ! R ..... "., PRWM'NARY LANDSCAPE ID/B/DI CUP IPADI-O.OS 00 ¡'m- i II'... ""","" ' .... "'",CVERLANO SELF STCRM'" H ' ~:;; ~= ==- , : ~ n n ~,,~ n;,;:;:;~ 0-1 THOMAS p, PECHT, ET AL . "'-' DBA RANCHO SELF STCRAGE . :=-..=- I>: I~ I; ,:;; ¡I~ ò,Z D~" !!I~ , ¡i¡~ City of Temecula 100 100 200 Feet e ., ""mop--""""ofT""""""- I_~-' ""mop'-""'-'" -","-Cony-,- ""..T_"""",_- --"Cony. """,_T""""'-~ """""""-""'--'" ~"'mop. -""--~"'mop ..---""-. ""- I_-"",_~_"-",,, _....- ""mop,""""""'_' N A w . . ;~ . ~ . I ; ~ ~ ~ ~ , occ i i i ~ ;,. ~.;~-~- ! ~ d ~! ~j '. 0 ~ 0 ~ ...,- -~- 3","01S '13s"ò><51M.'~ """"" 1V 13 'Hmdd "-OHl I.~o ~~ 3","OlS '13s'ãÑv'i;;;Ïo""",~",, " !~"êêi:!i:!êi:!i:! ¡ .~;;;;B; 0 ","'~'" , ,! ~~~mmi ;1 i ~~~;; ~ m~ m~;; ~i--'~J I - fc..--------.r- . ~ c--~y- ~ . Li--î ( (j i ~~h !! I; :1 ~ " ~~ ~,II ,¡II I .~. . :!~!h¡1i ' "'-~ i1.-~g .~" !i!I"""¡ , ~~~. "~~~., n~.< ~ ¡ ¡,¡,'ll" !í;!,! ' h~~h~~~~ ~~M¡;~ ,~! ~'Oh I 0 ~ ~ i " 1.¡¡,1ì I ~ - r¡l tillJ ~g;;;U ~,u ~ '-"-:F-':-- "-'¡¿'¡¡Ij:T,':-="';C ,-;i¥:~' j~ ,,;'g'~~. , ~ìj ~¡ì ','. F!! ~ ~ I'¡;~~~' "~~ \i ""'~ ~ ~ ~ 0" ~ ê E ~~§';~.~ .~.~ ~-~~, - "00--0>- ~m~;~ ;~ ;~ ~d ~ ~ i ~ !mm~~~ :!:~~~¡\¡\¡\¡\~U~~ ¡' I::i¡:,'~ L,¡¡i,! ,iii, "f;~ ¡¡; , 8 "i" ~" ~i, 1'~1 ì;!;¡ , ",Íc-:1 " !" li,M:i;lft", ,,-, ~~",,¡,~ ! ' -=. ."' ¡¡¡; ~ i I I., u- - LiL._. .. .:<":~j~ "'I, íi i ~I¡ "I g" ['!] @J _u_u_..-. ._u_u_u_. II 'i c:;. G' ; c ..-- SO90-'OV" dO' 1 .. - ...-.- _.~u~ ; t:.g I!I IiI . ¡ ill r-;¡! ¡O¡; "' ! ¡Iii! ¡¡¡II I d~1 I ¡i!! ~h¡i D i, il ! 0 ¡¡ ! Ii . Q! \ \, I> : tl " ! í 'Í ! . ( ¡ ,~ " I~ 11 l '1 II i! ¡¡ II " " " i , ¡ ,~ :1 11 I '" -- 30>"015 ,,;s"'=N:~~.J: 1V 13 '1H03dd SV^OHl ,"V"ClS ",5 ONVl",^C "'" ""'" "--, , 1'01 ¡¡ ,M ¡¡I !I, , Zi\ 91' ::¡I¡ >" ~I ~i H III ~I ! !! :1 II ,i i' /" 11 " ¡¡ ¡¡ II " n I ¡i ¡¡ 'I II ,i " ,1 ~~ ~~ ¡u~ ,~. W; ;':1 ::11 o¡ "'I , ~ ~.i'I¡¡¡ ïÎ! ~ ~:; ¡ ;¡ ,.1. î I.! i "¡¡¡¡¡!illl ~ ! ~ ¡ II ¡ ~ ¡iLl!: @ ~¡ ; H ~ ¡ ¡ B! ì ;Ni SO90-WV", dn, 0 i '"o'm'" '",Cl'n8 ,~".- I ! - " I ¡¡ I: '! I; . z' 01' ~I¡ >;. ~I w, Oi! :~! . ¡i Ii > . 1110 30V"C1S¡13š'=N;;~""~1I ~ ¡i' lV131H03d'dSV"CHl ,....:._~.,,-= "': I -,--_..- -. .. H ;\ .~~ ~~- -- ¡¡ i' -. ,,"'..~ 30V"OJ.Sj13sm:mõ-~"",.. -Q ""p~.,-":';:'""p- ~j~~ -r::;\-~~"",-:,~ :~ --, «Q¡- ,--, ,;~ ;/----!----' .. I,!! ~ i~~" , ~1! i.~ "I ~ ~ '; 1!ïi:",f,ãM~1i I'll \y~)~J, \- ,~. ¡Iii /;r":'~,:-;'-4\.; ¡II ¡ ¡, ~--~ ---0-, (t, ~J!¡J - ~ ~J ~i t! ~~ i:i ! ! - i ~, ¡ II x ! ) . Zi g!: -~:; '>" úM ..1: lUi e! : ,/ (f ! !1 ,--', &,! g,'li <11 GJ!' -JI 1111 11'1 ~I lU' ~I -JI '~ ü [I tI . ¡¡i¡H¡fJ¡¡fU¡¡¡¡Hí¡¡y:i ,¡!JiHW¡Hii¡ !HI ¡Hilm¡, ' ~~!.,I'¡<"ì'¡;f,i,!,H¡:.¡';!" ¡,,'Ii¡-!.,' ~~"."""",t"""""" " '-', . ~¡¡:I';;:'!'¡"¡i 5 ~ ¡ ~Lij¡J¡d : ¡ H ¡ I,f---@'¡'¡"J" ~.\líŒH!,,¡""H U !Î61¡q Iii H i,iH!i;¡/J¡ .! -, " i II¡ !iÌi ~m EI,n: "gO-IOVdH dO' 0 j SNOIl""3 0",01'08'" ... , : ~!; r--=-o.--l o!i 1 I "'j1 'lii51 .1 ~¡i "8:1 ¡ ~I 1151 e,l :01 L'-' Ii @, , ,F V Ii 1! " " \ , I ' , , , ; j ¡ ¡ ¡ ; ! ¡! h- ¡ g: ,,'I'll ¡! ¡~..-h'".t.,-.",..,!"._8. " - 11 , , ,! 1 " ¡ " ) i-" L-=-"l t! [¡ ¡¡1!! 51: ~ii >11 ~L:I UJ' II t--' 11'1 01 z' ,~I ü' ¡¡:! t'sl lul 1Ji¡ "'I ¡J'! Z!\ ~I~ <II' ai ..J' wi ~I ~I wi \,)1 it¡ 0 ui 1Ji! :0' sl IL' «M,I, .Iil [JD "YOO", .,., o:::o';? '1= .I~ ~.'~~'},':.'!' 'YH'.03d'dSYWOH". n" "'" )1 -"'-"--"P 0 ¡ -;:;::;= ";"'.:::: :,;' . ! i .I! ,q"',,"'" ,.YOO", m, ""Y'O""O ,~".-' '." - """"" "", )!. . t 1 " 1¡>---' ,; I ¡! l I .C' -.< ç j:",~,¡" ' .,~ ;,< ~ ~ "'_n ~iþ._n-. ;V;"i""-;o 0" :~ !:. '1" t: :<, 5! ¡:: u ...' \IIi " ,--- , jß! z! 0' ¡::I :HI ", ,'¡ ;J: G~ ! '~~':;:~;;; ~~,~"" "'" . , ,~ j l , " 1 i 1, ~ ¡ I ~~ ì J rv ~i rtJ ii:¡ , ;\ '). zi 1 ",f"". 7' 1 (.l~ III ~ ,~ V ~ D¡ , / ¡~ ~¡ ". °1 ,. ~ 51 \U' 10, , .. ".I ¡ , I . . u ","OiS ,,]S ÕÑV",^O'~" ""'" '. 3".015 ,,;SOHONV";":;:; '-.., ]V 13 'lH03d 'd ""O", I~~ fr-"-,~,,~,~:...., '~-'~.,~---"---,-, " , ,~.._..'~.-, Ic..., I '~'u,,' i- .i ¡ I! , -' . :': 1 O'Oc~Q~~,' òó1>.Q.ÖO . "..".,"""" ,',J',J~i , 'lllltiJ -- -- ~= t:coo~~~m~ : : "I' 1 i'¡ ! ¡ ! , I !, i -f ì ¡ ¡ i I ¡ I i. ~I ¡., ~I ': ' ~i ! i ! i !: i i '~ I' :! , ! I ,I ! ~! - ~ ~~== .~.~, i: ,t-" ~~~o:Lo-;i[~ - -' -- ~,- ',- '1,\' ,-"-,,,.::-_,,-,,----,,~"-"~ -,~_u- I., \ \ \ \' " . I'L ""H,' J1:;~ E' I "L() ! SO90-<OV"" dno ! I <olelo' - , 3dVOSONVl ""N'""'" ,~, ,- ~ ! ',"",'" j~, ~',I ¡ 5;~¿¡. ,I , ¡ " ;,; !\i ¡! >, .' ;! ,j "" !' >, ¡, ~ i! ~ H ., " 0, ; j :, \r; ! I J!I!! ,/1 d. i' ~ HI 1! ò @ó oJ' D z w Ii) W ..J ..J « ìi w f-- « L f-- Z « ..J !L ¡ .¡ , !1 H Hi ¡ :¡ ¡ !¡ ¡ ï¡ :fJ ¡ i: :¡,¡ !" I, ! " èò nil; CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR SELF 'R""ON COR"'", R""", ~ ,-_._~----- ----...-.. -~. -~~-- ,.._--~--_. ..------ ,-~._------ ---,-.._---~. -.------ "---~----- ._..~----- - ~--.._.~-_.,- --.,-..--.-- ,--.,--.----. ---.-- ,------_.~.. --.--.,---.-- --~--,--, ,~._~------- --..------ .---------.- --'-"--'--.'. .--------- -.----..--- '---'~- ..---_u_--. ----~~--~ ,,----,------ ._.__._~--_. "--'-~'~---" ~ ---.--- ..---.---- ----~ ..----.-.......-- --_.~----- - 'o_~.__._--_. ---------- ==:-æ-~.:i!:"'Sã=- ..------.-.- -,--------. .---------- - ----------- "._--_._~_.- -,-----_._~ --- ----- :.::==:=~.::::::-.::.- _n_____-----. -..-,.----- ---_._,_._-~ -----,. --~ -'-----__n _.,-_._--~- , ~-------~- -~----_._- --~---- '-'._-- 0 ----~--- ---.,-.--. ------ 0 -..--------- ---.------ . -----.~---- 0 --------- ---~--- - -.-.------ - ----- --.------ . -----_u_- OVERLAND STORAGE API'UCOO'10""'", ~ ~ --,-- --- //. -</ ./'#'/ \ // / ' /' .,Á \ / ... \ '-IS"" // //,' , \ (/À, \ /--' , , // " V/W"'. \y' .,~ , \ /..\ // ' \.'V'/ 'y/ " \ \. /./ \ "~ \~, />"\ >?~J:\ \, '<, -/~ý,/. ,..tr"",---' \, \,JP' /1"'- \ ,« .,ø~/ I \,"""'-' /' 1 \~/~y í .--. =,;,=.:::-;.;.-:::::--= - --------- ---------- ---------- -- " ~i::-=::~=:: " --------- ___._n__- -----..----. - --___~__n -----_u- ------- ------. -~._--_._- ----". - .-.-------. -_._--~. ---~----- : ~i~~-i;;~~~ _~___n____. .--------- - ---------- - ~------ ---.------ -.------- ---- .. ----_ox_- - ------ --.--..-.-- - E:r.:::.~:.~- - ------- --------- -~----- - -------.--- ------- - --------.- -- --------- ------- ---------.- .-ø-.- . ~----~- . -------- ----.--.-- ---.---- ~ARED BY, u:GA1...DESCI!IPTlON, --,.-,.-.--.-.-.-. .'--"'-.--'---- -.-----.-,.--- ",---'--'---'- .ASSESS<IR'a..P.Al!CEL..HUJ4BE, -- """"" ~~;;E ,""'._-- -..---------. --.--."'---- ': æ ~-.:=-'_.= -- ....0-_.- 0 . ._--- . ._-- -fF.1: _~::r-':,~:.: -----,.-.--- --------- --.~.__._- JWIlImBX¡ ':'- LU '!" i ¡ ,'" '" t '""""""'" ~ ::r.:. ,:: i ------¡-- .............. .--- -...--- --.....-- -- 'Ii... --;:-¡;¡¡;-- -- &U...~-~ . . . -::.:::~- ..::""t::ï: -- -- --- CITY OF TEMECULA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN FOR SELF STORAGE [ I I , ~== i : ) ;~~~,.. ð"~"~" ",l,,~,. ~"'<:::- """ . ."" "",., c,"."W! -.os, "'""' "'""" ';.~:::' ~ . . . OVERLAND " óJ- ~ . ~ ..... :=-~ ~ " .I:. -- =- ~ ~, ~ DETAIL: TYPE A-6 CUKB-GU'lTER """,""~'f""'",,""" Q3 DETAIL: TYPE D-6 CUKB """, ~",'1Ik""" """'" . ~:r"..-......' "-.. il ... -- ïr... ~ ""'"' ~~; L~~ - NIJlk=-E -,~r- !!!ß~~~~ =~ 1"- r '~ ~ UNDER SlDKlfAlK DRAlN """'~"','f"""""'" ""'"" -.. 4 -"_kk- m,.,... "'"------., -::.=._- -- . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- RoIC U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylSTAFF REPORT.doc 8 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF' TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAO1-0605 A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 103 UNIT SELF STORAGE FACILITY TOTALING 29,780 SQUARE FEET WITH 64 OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE SPACES ON A 173,440 SQUARE FOOT LOT, LOCATED ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE 01= OVERLAND DRIVE AND EAST OF COMMERCE CENTER DRIVE, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO.S 921- 480-044 AND 921-480-045 WHEREAS, Thomas Pecht filed Planning Application No. PA01-0605 (Conditional Use PermiVDevelopment Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on March 3, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested pmsons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOI_VE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by referenGe. Section 2. Bndinas The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.04.010E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed conditional use is consistent with the General Plan and the Development Code. The proposed sE/lf-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility is consistent with the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The proposed self-storage and recreational vehicle storage facility meets the purpose and intent of a Conditional Use Permit as defined in Section 17.04.010A of the Development Code. B. The proposed conditional use is compatible with the nature, condition and development of adjacent uses, buildings and structures and the proposed conditional use will not adversely affect the adjacent uses, buildings or structures. R:\C U 1'\2001101-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 1 The proposed conditional use is compatible with adjacent land uses as defined in the General Plan. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the adjacent land uses and has determined that the proposed use will be a complimentary addition to the area. C. The site for a proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer areas, landscaping, and other development features prescribed in the Old Town Temecula Specific Plan and required by the Planning Commission or Council in order to integrate the use with other uses in the neighborhood. Staff has reviewed the proposed project against the Development Code requirements for a self-storage and recreational facility and has found that the project meets or exceeds all of the requirements. D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the community. Staff has reviewed the proposed self-storage and recreational facility and found that it in no way will be detrimental to the health, safety, or general welfare of the community. Ingress and egress to the site have been located in a safe location and will not impede or affect traffic flow along either Overland Drive or Commerce Center Drive. Fire Prevention has reviewed circulation and drive aisle widths and has determined that the site will able to be adequately seNed by the Fire Department in an emergency situation. E. That the decision to approve, conditionally approve, or deny the application for a conditional use permit be based on substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Director of Planning. This application has been brought before the Planning Commission at a Public Hearing where members of the public have had an opportunity to be heard on this matter before the Planning Commission renders their decision. Section 3. Findinas The Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Sections Section 17.05.010F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for SeNice Commercial (SC) and Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan, as well as the development standards for the SeNÍce Commercial (SC) and Light Industrial (LI) zoning districts in the City of Temecula Development Code. The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed self-storage buildings. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The architecture proposed for the self-storage buildings are consistent with the Architectural requirements as stated in the Design Guidelines and the Commercial Performance Standards of the Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, R\C U 1'\2001\01-Q605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 2 . . . . . . and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The project will have no significant environmental impacts and has been found to be categorically exempt pursuant to Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Project) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. Section 5. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves the Application, a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 103 unit seH storage facility totaling 29,780 square feet with 64 outdoor Recreational Vehicle spaces on a 1 ¡'3,440 square foot lot with conditions of approval as set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, al1d incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3rd day of March 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R,IC U P\2ooI101-0605 Overland Self Stnrage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of March 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R,\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland Self Storage Facility\PC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 4 . . . . . . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:IC U 1'\2001101-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilitylPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 5 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0711 (Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan) Project Descrip,tion: A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 103 unit self storage facility totaling 29,780 square feet with 64 outdoor Recreational Vehicle spaces on a 173,440 square foot lot, located on the south side of Overland Drive and east of Commerce Center Drive DIF Category: Service Commercial Assessor's Par,cel No.: 921-480-044 and 921-480-045 Approval Date: March 3, 2004 Expiration Date: March 3, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMI::NT Within Forty-Eight (48} Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public RElsources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)]. General Requirements The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The R:IC U P\2001l01-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 6 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. . The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this development plan. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year extensions of time, one year at a time. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits D (Site Plan), E (Grading Plan), F (Building Elevation), G (Floor Plan), and F (Landscape Plan) contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. . All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being placed below the surrounding parapet wall. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. All downspouts shall be internalized. The construction landscape drawings shall indicate coordination and grouping of all utilities, which are to be screened from view per applicable City Codes and guidelines. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. . R\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland SelfStomge FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 7 . 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. Lighting shall be consistent with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. A separate permit shall be required for any window awnings. All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this Development Plan. This Conditional Use Permit may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.03.080 of the City's Development Code. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 20. . 21. 22. 23. Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies. The applicant shall submit a parking lot lighting plan to the Planning Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees. A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 24. 25. 26. . A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially to the approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). R,IC U 1'12001101-0605 Overland Self Stomge FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 8 27. 28. 29. 30. 31. b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. . c. d. e. All utilities and light poles shall be shown and labeled on the landscape plans and appropriate screening shall be provided. A three-foot (3.0') clear zone shall be provided around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department. The Planning Director shall approve the Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. The building construction plans shall include details for all trash enclosures for the project, which shall consist of masonry walls and metal or wood doors, a trellis structure over the top of the enclosure, a concrete floor and a concrete stress pad to reduce pavement damage from disposal trucks. The construction plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange". . Prior to Release of Power 32. 33. 34. 35. The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning Department for a period of one-year from the date of the first occupancy permit. Prior to release of power, all site improvements including but not limited to parking areas and striping shall be installed. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. The applicant shall submit a comprehensive sign program for review and approval by the Planning Director. All signage shall comply with the approved sign program. . R,\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland Self Storage Facility\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 9 . . . 39. 40. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS General Requirement!¡ 36. A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way. 37. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 38. All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter, drive approach, storm drain facilities, sewer and domestic water systems Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and private property. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. The Developer s,hall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site and upstream 0'1 this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. RôlC U P\200!IOI-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 10 47. 48. 49. 50. 51. 46. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District b. Planning Department c. Department of Public Works d. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. Permanent landscape and irrigation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department and the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off- site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The applicant shall provide a trash enclosure on the plan that is large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as a regular solid waste bin. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 52. 53. 54. 55. 56. 57. Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria shall be observed: Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions. R,\C U P\200I\01-%O5 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc II 58. . . . . . . 59. 60. 61. The Developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over the adjacent property. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 62. 63. 64. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearanCl3 from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District Department of Public Works c. All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT 65. 66. 67. Final fire and Iif'3 safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. In lieu of required access around some buildings, and building less than five feet from property line, or more than 150' from Fire Department access will be required to have a four hour rated exterior wall. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire R,IC U 1"\2001101-0605 Overland Sdf5tnrage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 12 70. 71. 72. 73. 74. 75. 76. 77. Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) . 68. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of 150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are required. (CFC 903.2) 69. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) . Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. One may be an exit only allowing emergency access. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be . R\C U P\2oo1\01-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 13 . . . 78. 79. 80. 81. 82. of a contrastin£1 color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4) Prior to issuancl3 of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9) ALL BUILDINGS in this project are to be sprinkled. Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station. Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10) Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be located to the riøht side of the main entrance door, or entry gate. (CFC 902.4) All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fin3 Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane painting and or signs. Special Conditions 83. 84. 85. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternatiye file formats may be acceptable, contact fire prevention for approval. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105) The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any quantities used or stored on site increase or should changes to operation introduce any additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E) RIC U 1'12001101-0605 Overland SdfStorage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COAdoc 14 89. COMMUNITY SERVICES . General Conditions 86. All perimeter landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or private maintenance association. 87. The trash enclosure shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as, regular solid waste bin. 88. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris. Prior to Issuance Building Permits The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. BUILDING AND SAFETY 90. 91. 92. 93. 94. 95. 96. 97. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code. The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance 03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. . Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review. All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations. Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,1998) Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. . R:\C U P\2001\OI-OO05 Overland Self Storage Facility\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 15 . 98. 99. 100. 101. 102. 103. 104. 105. 106. . 107. 108. 109. Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry. Provide house E>lectrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting, fire alarm systerns. Restroom fixtums, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001 edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans prior to permit issuance. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic and rnechanical plan for plan review. Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal. Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons with disabilities. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. Trash enclosur'3s, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits. Show all building setbacks. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No. 0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday..Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with thesI3 conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Date Applicant's Signature . Applicant's Printed Name R:\C U 1'\2001\01-0605 Overland Self Storage FacilityIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc 16 . ITEM #5 . . . . . STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: March 3, 2004 Prepared by: Dan Long Title: Associate Planner File Number Application Type: Product Review PA03-0551 Project Description: Planning Application No. PA03-0551, submitted by Shea Homes, is a product review for 99 detached single family residences within Planning Area 3 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road (Tract 29661-3). Plan 1, single story 1,997 square feet(18 units): Mission (4 units) Mediterranean (10 units) French (4 units) Plan 2, two story 2,885 square feet (20 units): Mission (7 units) Mediterranean (6 units) French (7 units) Plan 3, two story 3,023 square feet (28 units) Mission (6 units) Mediterranean (10 units) French (12 units) Recommendation: Plan 4, two story, 3,245 square feet (33 units) Mission (15 units) Mediterranean (11 units) French ( 7 units) [8] Approve with Conditions 0 Deny 0 Continue for Redesign 0 Continue to: 0 Recommend Approval with Conditions 0 Recommend Denial R:lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Rao"h SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, P A03-05511ST AFF REPORT-1.doc 1 CEQA: ~ Categorically Exempt (Class) 15162 . 0 Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: Bob Yoder, Shea Homes Completion Date: January 28, 2004 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: April 28, 2004 General Plan Designation: Low Medium Residential (LM) Zoning Designation: Low Medium Residential (LM) SP-11, Roripaugh Ranch Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East: West: Single family Residential (Riverside County) Very Low Density Residential (VL) Vacant Vacant . Lot Area: 5, 000 square foot minimum Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage N/A Parking Required/Provided 2 covered enclosed spaces (20' x 20') BACKGROUND SUMMARY 1811. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Architectural Review The project proposes four (4) floor plans and three (3) architectural styles that are fairly consistent with the Residential Architectural Guidelines found in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Section 4.10. . R,\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3. P AO3-O5511ST AFF REPORT-1.dcc 2 . . . The applicant has chosen the option of Design Group E (pg. 4-97) from the Specific Plan, which allows the use of one style from the design groups A-D. The applicant has chosen to use three architectural styles, inlJluding Mission, Mediterranean and French on four floor plans. This concept is consistent with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan. The various materials and features proposed include the following for each architectural style: Mission: Smooth stucco finish 20/30 aggregate, arched windows, 5:12 roof pitch, "S" tile concrete roof tile, arched chimney cap, wrought iron detail, multi-paned windows, exposed rafter tails, arched doors, and recessed windows. . Mediterranean: Smooth stucco finish 20/30 aggregate, arched windows, 4:12 roof pitch, band detail, "S" tile roof, multi-paned windows, arched doors, wrought iron details, and columns at windows. French: Light I€Lce stucco finish, cultured stone veneer, 6:12 and 10:12 roof pitch, flat shingle roof tile, arched doors, French style shutters and window sills, wrought iron detail, multi-paned windows, and horizontal siding. The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan requires articulation on all sides of the homes ("Four-sided Architecture"). Each side of each product provides specific features of the proposed architecture style. The applicant has provided specific details, which are unique to each style proposed on each elevation, including door and window types, window and door trim, garage door design including windows, materials such as wrought iron details, stone, roof type and pitch, shutters and the overall silhouette. However, it is staff's opinion that the proposed Mission and Mediterranean styles are very similar. As an example, one of the predominant features of any home is the roof; both the Mission and Mediterranean homes have the same roof materials and shape of roof. If one refers to the Design Guidelines and looks at these two styles, one sees that a barrel tile roof is a desired feature, not the low profile "s" tile roof as proposed. In addition, in the Design Guidelines, one can see that the entry for Mission style is completely different that that of the Mediterranean, yet the proposed styles are basically the same. The Mission style shows a wide, recessed entry, while the Mediterranean has a smaller arched entry. The proposed entries for the Mediterranean and Mission are basically the same. In addition, the Design Guidelines callout for smooth plaster walls for the Mission style and the proposal includes a 20/30 aggregate stucco. The Design Guidelines also call for wrought iron detailing and the applicant has provided some wrought iron details. Both the Mission and Mediterranean styles shown in the Design Guidelines have an open entry while the proposed Mission and Mediterranean show gates at the entries. Each style includes a roof pitch that varies from the others styles. The French style includes a typical roof pitch of 6:1:2 with intermittent 10:12 pitches, Mission includes a 5:12 pitch and a 4:12 pitch has been proposød for Mediterranean. Staff feels these roof pitches provide variety in the street scene and furth<3rmore, they are representative of the architectural style. The applicant has included various one-story elements into the two story products by incorporating steps in the plane, gables, first-floor projections and various horizontal and vertical movement throughout the silhouette. In addition, the applicant avoided the "canyon-effecf' by incorporating the above mentioned elements and carefully plotting each plan (setbacks and mixing of each plan). Staff does feel, however, that the Mediteranean and Mission styles are very similar. The applicant has provided main entries that standout as the clear focal point of the front elevation with the use of covered entries, arched doors and entries, towers, low walls, and by R:lProductReviewIRoripaugh Ran;h SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-j)551ISTAFFREPORT-1.doc 3 bringing the living space forward as opposed to garage dominated frontages. Plans one, two and three include single story elements projecting at least 8'-0" in front of the garage, while plan four provides a covered entry/porch projecting 5'-4" forward in front of the garage. The applicant has complied with the 50% architectural forward concept. Plans one, two and three provide architectural forward concepts (at least 8 feet of living space in front of the garage) as defined in the Specific Plan; a total of 66 products proposed through out planning area 3 will maintain the architectural forward concept. . The applicant has proposed plan two and three for all corner lots. The Specific Plan requires single story products or products with single story massing at corner yards. Plan two and three both include single story elements on the exterior corner. Plan two includes a side entry element and tower, which will be visible from the front and exterior side. Plan three includes a courtyard with decorative walls including a gate and wrought iron detail. As shown on the plans, the courtyard and walls will not be visible, however staff has included, as a condition of approval, that corner lots pull the fence back to expose the courtyard from the street. Staff feels this will open up the exterior elevation and beautify the street scene. Both plans carry significant detail to the exterior elevations such as arched windows, wrought iron detail, decorative window sills, stone, and decorative roof treatments as well as numerous windows, which break up the wall plane. Of the three architectural forward products, plans one and three include a shallow recessed garage setback 8'-0" and 8'-4" respectively from the front façade. Plan two includes a mid to deep recessed garage setback 14'-0" from the front façade. In addition to the recessed garages, the applicant has proposed, tandem garages and split door garages (plans one and two) to meet the intent of Section 10.4.3 Architectural Forward Standards. Product Placement . The proposed product placement meets the Residential Architectural Guidelines of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan in that the applicant has incorporated the architectural enhancements on all four elevations. The careful plotting (setbacks) and single story elements on two-story products will avoid the canyon effect, which is required in the Specific Plan. Also, there is no style or plan located side by side more than 3 in a row (with the exception of lots 23, 70, 60 and 53). SinGle StOry The Specific Plan states "The requirement for one-story products shall be determined by the market or as determined by staff as long as some single story products are required in the single family detached areas." The applicant has provided one single story product (floor plan one), which makes up 18 of the 99 residences. Staff recommends that no less than 20 percent of the products shall be single story. Staff recommends that two additional single story products be added on lots 69 or 70 (corner lots) and one other lot. There are a total of 4 plan threes plotted in a row, lot 23, 70, 69 and 53. Staff feels that by replacing lot 69 or 70 with a plan one it will provide a single story on a corner lot and break up the number of plans threes in a row to no more than two. . R,lProduct Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3. PAO3-0551\STAFF REPORT-1.doc 4 . . . ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION !8J 1. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Ne!~ative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEOA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). CO NCLUSIONfRECOMM ENDA TIO N Based on the analysis :summarized in this report, staff has determined that the findings required for approval can be made with the attached recommended Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F) 1. 2. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of residential development proposed. ThEI project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall dElsign of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewecf for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable poli.~ies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions (Under Separate Cover) - Blue Page 6 Roripaugh Ranch Design Guidelines (excerpt) - Blue Page 7 2. 3. PC Resolution 1\10. 2004-- Blue Page 8 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval R:lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Raoch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, P A03-O5511ST AFF REPORT-I.doc 5 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, PAO3-0551\STAFF REPORT-1.doc 6 f:~:;;:;;;:;'~ ='j¡";;-;4",,~"'j;;,"-Y";;;;;'-c;~- æ~; -";~~"'T_,~," . . . ATTACHMENT NO.2 RORIPAUGH RANCH DESIGN GUIDELINES R:lProduct ReviewIRuripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-05511STAFF REPORT-1.doc 7 ASHBY USA, llC FIGURE 4-54 .'i FRENCH COTTAGE - Inspiration Photo: . . (8 The K,ith com"nie1-rKC ~~ TO 'CA'~ Design features: - Steeper roof pitch - Arched resessed entry door . Clipped comer openings - Flat tile or shingle roof - Shutters - Multi-pane windows - Stone veneer base H () rij){l Ll~~d 1 J-: ~ o~ Of .c . 01 Coo (])~ '-~ lJ....' .Ii l !/ g ~ II '" !i I ltlllch (J (' " ) u ASHBY USA. LLC MISSION FIGURE 4-57 Inspiration Photo: Tho Ko;th com.on;o°rT1<.C ~ TO .CAt~ Design feature: - Arched focal point - Round top windows . Tile accents on walls . Smooth plaster walls - Multi-pane windows - Barrel tile roof . Exposed rafter tiles . Wrought iron detailing - Ii ~ ~ ~, £ l '" ~ ~ ¡¡ I . . HorifJaugl1 - H:111Ch . . - ASHBY USA, L~é ' MEDITERRANEAN FIGURE 4-56 .r II :!:ii "'C~ <D~ ~~ i, ~ iI' ~ i ~ I Inspiration Photo: The <"th C ompe"'" ~;. '..0 ~~ , ' .1 Design features: - Arched Focal P , - Stucco windo olnls - Bullnose ban: ds:rroundS - Barrel 1'1 tails , ,I e roofing - ~reramlc tile accents - elhs beam details Multi-pane wind -Wr ' ows oughllron details r' Hor]! );¡ ¡ 1&;11 H:u 1 c11 DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES . 4,10.1 Introduction These design guidelines will be utilized to direct the future physical development of Roripaugh Ranch, an 804.7-acre, mixed-use development currently located in the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. In order to create a unique community structure, these community guidelines provide a framework for site planning, the architectural theme and landscaping relating to the project. The purpose of these guidelines is to assure a high quality community character and land use compatibility. 4,10.2 Purpose It is the intent of these guidelines to provide direction on a project-wide level as well as a planning area and site-specific level. For example, the guidelines establish criteria at the project level to assure a unified environment, while the planning area and site-specific level individual projects will be required to comply with relevant design standards applicable to each use. Although each project should relate to the overall community design theme, these guidelines are not intended to limit innovative design. The use of these guidelines will serve to direct the overall design of Roripaugh Ranch and assure a high quality community character, appearance and land use compatibility. The City of Temecula city staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and other City decision-making bodies will be providing direction when reviewing development projects within Roripaugh Ranch. These guidelines will also serve as design criteria for use by planners, architects, landscape architects, engineers, builders and future property owners. They will provide a viable framework and clear direction during the development process, without limiting innovative design. The resull will be a community with a strong sense of identity, character and cohesiveness. . 4.10.3 Residential Architectural Standards 4.10,3.1 Design Groups The intent of these guidelines is to encourage architectural style diversity between the adjacent residential planning areas. Each builder is required to contact the City Planning Department to discuss and review any established facade styles in adjacent Planning Areas so as to assist in the selection of subsequent styles. Each Planning Area shall be composed of one of the following Exterior Facade Design Groups (Groups A through E) consisting of different Architectural Styles. Within each Residential Planning Area Design Group selected, a minimum of two architectural styles and a maximum of four styles shall be used. Each style as noted in this section shall have a minimum of four-color variations for each Residential Planning Area, No more than four of the same architectural styles may be placed next to one another. Desian Group A (All Planning Areas) I. II. III. IV. Classical Revival (See Figure 4-49) Spanish Revival (See Figure 4-60) Prairie (See Figure 4-59) California Ranch (See Figure 4-48) . 4-96 . March,~OO3. .' 8 - (8 DESIGN GUIDELINES Desian GrauD 8 (All Planning Areas) I. II. III. IV. Colonial (See Figure 4-50) I=rench Cottage (See Figure 4-54) East Coast Traditional (See Figure 4-53) Monterey (See Figure 4-58) Desian GrouD C (Planning Areas 1O, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 338 only) I. II. III. Mediterranean (See Figure 4-56) American Farmhouse (See Figure 4-47) Contemporary Southwest (See Figure 4-51) Desian GrouD D (Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 338 only) I. II. III. 11talianate (See Figure 4-55) Mission (See Figure 4-57) Craftsman (See Figure 4-52) Desian GrouD E (Acceptable for all Planning Areas) One style from each of the above groups. All merchant builders shall submit plans which identity unique aspects of each style to the City for approval that include text, exhibits and any other materials deemed necessary by the City indicating how th,e proposed residences will conform with the architectural styles shown in the exhibits 4.47-61 listed in Design Groups A through E, and all other design requirements of this chapter. 4.10.3.2 Submittal and Review Requirements The following materials shall be submitted for review and confonnance to the Architectural Guidelines and Specific Plan for the Roripaugh Ranch. The Planning Director may choose to require additional materials for review. Color elevations of all four sides at scale of )4" = 1'. Show materials and colors. Provide dimensions of height and width of major elements. Indicate features that would bring elevation design into compliance with the Architectural Design Guidelines and the specific requirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Sections through each elevation at 14" = 1'. Indicate pitch of roof, extent of overhangs, recess of doors and windows and position of trim, trellis and other major architectural features in relation to the primary face of the residence. Site Plan at 1/8' = 1'. Show, in color and with dimensions the areas and type of paving, area and type of landscaping, fencing, site walls, and other site appurtenances. Indicate how the paving and landscaping is consistent with the Architectural Guidelines and specnic re'quirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Provide by separate ,;heet, a matrix indicating the percentage of lot coverage, percentage of impervious paved area and percentage of landscaping. Provide a color and materials board of a minimal 18" x 18" size. Indicate all colors and materials as shown on the color elevations. Provide one board with one reduced color elevation to indicate confonnance with the color variety required by the Architectural Design Guidelines and specific requirements of the Design Group (Figures 4,47 through 4-60). Rortpaugh Ranch Specific Plan N:\31367, OOOldodlSPSect44CCAciopted ,doc , 4-97 . March;<2003' DESIGN GUIDELINES Provide two color sets of the above at the scales indicated including a duplicate set of the color and materials board. In addition, provide six (6) sets of the above in reduced, 11" x 17" black and white format. . 4.10,3.3 Architecture Forward and Garage Standards The following standards shall apply to all residential Planning Areas, except as specified: .Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into 100% of the homes in Planning Areas10, 19,20,21, and 33A. "Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into at least 50% of the homes in each of Planning Areas 1A, 2, 3, 4A, 48,12,14,15,16,17,18,22, 23, 24, and 31. This concept includes advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is held in place or further recessed. Residential dwelling units shall be designed to allow the living portion of the dwelling unit to be .positioned" forward on the lot so that the architecture of the garage will not dominate the street scene. A variety of garage placement solutions shall be incorporated into the overall design of the homes. Minimum driveway length from the property line to the garage door shall be eighteen feet (18') for front-entry garages in all Planning Areas and ten feet (10') from the property line to the garage edge for side entry garages in the Land LM Districts. Garage solutions that should be incorporated into the overall design are as follows: Shallow Recessed Garaaes (See FIgure 4-62) Selting the garage back a minimum of eight feet (8') in relationship to the front of the house. (~) Mid to Deep Recessed Garaaes (See Figure 4-63) Selting the garage back to the middle or rear of the lot. . Third Car Side Loaded (See Figure 4-64) Selting for garage with side-loaded entry. This plan can only occur on larger lots. Side Entry Garaaes (See FIgure 4-65) The use of side entry garages on lots at least 52 feet wide in order to break the continuous view of garage doors along the street scene. . Third Car Tandem (See Figure 4-66) Selting for third car tandem garage. Sinale Width Drivewavs (See Figure 4-67) This setting provides a maximum driveway width of twelve (12) feet for adjacent two-car garage. Porte Cochere (See Figure 4-68) Setting provides for the incorporation of a porte cochere. ~.~ . Rorlpaugh Ranch Specific Plan . 0" N:\31367.000\dod\SPSect44CCAdopted,doc " 4-98 Ma«:h. 2003 . . . DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10,3.5 Building Elevations A key technique for creating a sense of variety within a project is to vary the heights and forms of the detached homes as seen from the street as illustrated in Figure 4-70 by utilizing the following: Within Low and Low Medium density Planning Areas, utilize both one- and two-story buildings. To improve the visual relationship between adjacent buildings, it is desirable to introduce intermediate transition between them. Use a one-story architectural element within the two- story building to lessen its apparent height. Create varying rooflines by maximizing offsets of roof planes. Units located at street corners (see Figure 4-70), should be either single-story or have a significant on3-story mass located towards the exterior side yard. Treatment of Mass Avoid a canyon-like effect between buildings and allow greater light penetration into what otherwise mi9ht be dark side-yards. At interior side yards, it is required to create the appearance c,f increased building separation by stepping the second story mass away from the property line or any other substantial articulation. Provide trims around windows, to break up the wall plane. Avoid long uniinterrupted exterior walls. Vary the depth of plans to create variations in the building façade. Two story homes shall be modified to be compatible with placement on corner lots. The modffication shall create two front elevations. Surface detail, omament and architectural elements such as comices, color contrast, gables applied moldings, arcàdes, colonnades, stairways and light fixtures that provide visual interest, shadow, and contrast shall be used to enrich architectural character, Details shall be integrated with the overall design concept. Vary the height and roof levels of the building or residence so that it appears to be divided into smaller massing elements. Architectural projections shall be used to achieve this goal. Articulate building forms and elevations with varying rooflines, roof overhangs and intermediate roof elements to create strong patterns of shade and shadow. Intertockina Mass Just as stepping the second story mass improves the side yard, it can be used to improve the front yard scene. As an example, the second story should be set back in relationship to the garage face or living space below it. The designer should envision the building form as a series of interlocking masses rather than a rectangular or "L" shaped box. Therefore achieving a more aesthetic design solution. Rortoauoh Ranch Soocific Plan N: 13136 7 . OOO\dod\S P Sect 44CCAoJo pi ad. doc 4,124 March, 2003 , DESIGN GUIDELINES Articulation of Side and Rear Elevations There is a tendency to have "build our planes maximized on side and rear yards without articulated treatment of those planes. This results in a two-story stucco effect with no vertical or horizontal relief. Utilize the following techniques or other acceptable techniques to avoid this effect: . Create a single-story plane at the rear by recessing the second story. Utilize other similar arcMectural treatments and designs such as balconies or pop out staircases to encourage relief on potential large arcMectural planes. Side and rear elevations shall have articulation with modulated facades, window treatment, second story projections and balconies. Articulation shall be provided on all sides of the homes ("Four-sided Architecture"). Front Elevations Architectural projections shall be utilized to emphasize entrances, balconies, and porches. Fronts of houses shall utilize several architectural features. Ground floor windows shall have signfficant trim or relief, second floor overhangs or built in planters. Second story windows shall have similar treatment to emphasize them. All residences shall incorporate entry courtyards, covered entries or covered porches at the entry into the design. (See Figure 4-71 and 4-72). Details shall be concentrated around entrances. Materials used for the front entry shall be distinctive. . Building elements that reflect the arcMectural style should be incorporated into building entries, windows, front porches, and living areas directly adjacent to the street. Ornamental features including wrought iron and exterior light features shall be combined with other features to create interest in the front of the house with architecturally compatible elements. Rorioauah Ranch SDBCific Plan N:\31367.000\dodlSPSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-125 March, 2003 . . . '. DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10,3.6 Architectural Elements A successful project design achieves a proper visual balance and sense of cohesiveness. The differences betwgen the plans and elevation must be readily discemable and create variety, yet at the same time elements, styles and materials should not contrast to such an extent as to result in visual chaos. Amhitectural elements will playa significant role in the establishment of the architectural style. These elements include architectural detailing, colors and materials, and other site structures. The required Archnectural and design elements techniques are as follows: Unit Entries (See Figures 4-71 and 4,72) The entry serves several important architectural and psychological functions: it identifies and frames the front doorway; it acts as an interface between the public and private spaces; and it acts as an introduction to the structure while creating an initial impression. The entry shall be designed and located so as to readily emphasize its prime functions. Accent materials are encouraged to be used to further emphasize the entries. If the front door location is not obvious or visible because of building configuration, the entry shall direct and draw the observer in the desired path. The design of the entry area in merchant-built housing shall be strong enough to mitigate the impact of the garage on the facade. Entry doors and doorways shall be proportional to the architectural style of the structure. Covered entriøs, courtyards and porches shall be provided as entry elements. Doors Emphasis shall bE! placed on the design and type of entry door used. It functions as the major introduction to the interior of the house and concern should be given on the image it creates. Either single or double doors are appropriate. The door shall be covered by an overhead element or recessed a minimum of 3 It into the wall plane. The entire door assembly shall be treated as a single design element including surrounding frame, moldinø and glass sidelights. Recessed doors may be used to convey the appearance of thick exterior doors. Wood may be used for the entry door. Wood grain texture and raised or recessed panels contribute to the appeal of the door. Greater use is being made of metal entry doors but in order to be acçeptable, they shall possess the same residential "feel" provided by the wood grain and panels. Doorways shall be typically rectangular or round-headed and fully recessed. Spiral columns, arches, pilaster, stonework, decorative tiles, or other sculptural details shall be integrated into the doorway design to enhance the visual importance of the entry door. Rorioauoh Ranch SDBCific Plan N:\31367. OOOIdod\SPSect44CCAd opted.doc 4-127 March, 2003 DESIGN 'GUIDELINES The use of glass in the door and overall assembly is encouraged. It expresses a sense of welcome and human scale. It can be incorporated into the door panels or expressed as single sidelights, double sidelights, transom glass or fan windows. . Flexibility is allowed concerning the color of the door. It may match or contrast the accent trim, but should be differentiated from the wall color. Windows Typically, the location of windows is determined by the practical consideration of room layout, possible fum~ure placement, view opportunities and concem for privacy. Greater design emphasis should be directed to ensure that window placement and organization will positively contribute to the exterior architectural character. Windows greatly enhance the elevation through their vertical or horizontal grouping and coordination with other design elements. This relationship to one another and the walVroof plane creates a composition and sense of order. All windows in a specific plan elevation shall be integrated into the architecture of the building. This should not be interpreted that they are all the same shape, size or type but rather that a hierarchy of windows exists that visually relates and complements one window to another. Windows shall be recessed to convey the appearance of thick exterior walls. Non-recessed windows shall be surrounded With articulated architectural elements such as wood trim, stucco surrounds, shutters or recessed openings, shutters, pot shelves, ledges, sills plantons, and rails that compliment the architecture. Merchant-built housing occasionally fails to adequately address proper window design and placement on rear and side elevations. This is usually due to prioritization, maintenance and cost factors. Since side elevations and second story rear windows are frequently visible, greater design effort and budget prioritization need to be given. . Garaae Doors (See Figure 4-73) Utilizing garage types that compliment the architecture, door designs, and plotting techniques will do much to lessen the repetitious garage doors marching down both sides of a residential street. Variations include: 0 Employment of second-story feature windows above the garage. 0 Strong architectural entry elements. Designs with a mix of 2 and 3 car garages, incorporating three single doors in some three car garage plans not facing the street. 0 0 Allowance for a 10-foot setback between adjacent garages. 0 The use of tandem garages may also be incorporated into the building design. 0 Garage plans with a double door and a single door plan shall not be placed next to each other. If applicable, where lot width permits plans should include swing-in or side entry garages with reduced front yard setbacks of ten (10) feet. '; Rorioauah Ranch Scecific Plan N:\31367.000\dod\SPSect44CCAdopted.doc 4-128 March. 2003 . . I. . , . c." DESIGN. GUIDELlNÈS The design of the garage door shall relate to the overall architectural design of the residence. Colors shall be from the same paint palette. Omamentation of garage doors shall be provided to add visual interest from the street scene. The use of the sectional, wood or metal, rolling garage door is required since it maximizes the availability ot useable driveway length. Several different panel designs shall be utilized for any project proposed by each merchant builder. Metal doors shall only be used when they include either texture or raised panels of a "residentiar nature. The use of window elements is encouraged. The design of the door face shall result in a treatment which breaks up the expanse of the door plane while being complimentary to thè architectural elevation of the residence. Architectural detail consisting of cornices, applied molding or trim or applied headers shall be used. There shall be an 8" recess. (See Exhibit 4-73). RoriDauoh Ranch SDeCific Plan N:\31367.000\dod\SPSect44CCAolopted.doc 4-129 March, 2003 . . . ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- R,lProduct ReviewIRoripaugh Rauch SP\Shea Homes Tr 296151-3, PA03-0551\STAFF REPORT-I.doc 8 ~~k,~~..i~~.,¡."""{>fi¡;'W"';",."",~",,- . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0551 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH OF MUi=lRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS TRACT 29661-3.. WHEREAS, Sh'3a Homes, filed Planning Application No.PA03-0551 , in accordance with the City of Temecula G'3neral Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA03-0551 was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA03-0551 on March 3, 2004 at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested pørsons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this mattel~; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission approved Planning Application No. PAO3-0551; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Eindinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application No. PA03-0551 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010.F of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city. The proposed single-family homes are permitted in the Low Medium Density land use designation standards contained in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and the City's Development Code. The project is also consistent with the Low Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly planned and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and density of the residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including the California Environmental Ouality Act (CEQA), the City Wide Design Guidelines, and fire and building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. R:IProduct ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PAO3-0551\Resolution w ColA.doc 1 The overall design of the single-family homes, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working in and around the site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety and welfare. . Section 3, Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning Application No. PA03-0551 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby conditionally approves Planning Application No. PA03-0551 for a Product Review for detached single family residences within Planning Area 3 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Tract Map 29661-3. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 3rd day of March 2004. . John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary {SEAL} . R:\Produc\ Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-oSS1\Resolution w ColA.doc 2 . . . STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) " Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temeculs. at a regular meeting thereof held on the 3rd day of March, 2004, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-0551\Resolution w ColA.doc 3 e EXHIBIT A . CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL . R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PAO3-QSS1\Resolution w ColA. doc 4 . . . EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0551 (Product Review) Project Description: A Product Review for detached single family residences within Planning Area 3 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan located south of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and west of the future extension of Butterfield Stage Road, Tract Map 29661-3. Approval Date: March 3, 2004 Expiration Datil: March 3, 2006 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Røsources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall bE! void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements; 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code', Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify, R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ra lch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-Q551\Resolution w ColA.doc 5 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval. . Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by these changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Director of Planning. This approval is for product review only and shall in no way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall. . Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. All Mediterranean and Mission styles shall utilize a smooth to light texture stucco finish (20/30 aggregate or smoother) as determined acceptable by the Planning Director. French style shall utilize a light lace stucco finish or as determined acceptable by the Planning Director. All Mission style products shall provide a barrel type roof tile as determined acceptable by the Planning Director. . R:\Product Review\Rortpaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3, PAO3.Q551\Resolution w ColAdoc 6 . 16. 17. . 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 13. All hardscape (walks and driveways) within the front yard shall be colored concrete with varying textures and score lines, paving stones of various colors with colored concrete borders, flag stone of various sizes and colors with concrete borders of a combination of various textures:, shapes, material and colors. Hardscape design shall be uniform within each lot. 14. The applicant shall include the additional colors (Harvest Gold, Mocha and Omaha Tan) into the hardsGape plotting plan/matrix as shown on the concrete color schemes provided to the¡ Planning Department. Colors and design scheme shall match the residential unit and architectural design. All slopes five føet or greater in vertical height and greater than or equal to 3:1 shall be landscaped at a minimum with an appropriate ground cover spaced at eight inches on center, one 15 ¡allon or larger size tree per 600 square feet of slope area (50% shall be 15 gallon, 50% shall be 24" box), and one five gallon or larger shrub for each 100 square feet of slope ama. Slopes in excess of eight feet in vertical height and greater or equal to 3:1 shall also be provided with one 24" box or larger tree per 1,000 square feet of slope area in addition to the above requirements. 15. Ground cover shall be planted continuous under all trees and shrubs. A plan one shall be plotted on lot 69 and 70 and one other corner location as determined by the Planning Director. No less than 20 percent of lots shall be single story products. All A/C units shall be plotted in the rear yard. No A/C units shall be plotted on side yards. All roof venting shall be decorative and match the roof design and color. All fencing on cl)rner lots shall be pulled back towards the rear yard where a plan 3 is plotted in order to expose the courtyard to the street scene. All courtyard gates for plan 3 shall utilize decorative wrought iron gates as determined by the Planning Din3ctor. All fencing and pilasters between residential units and fencing visible from the public view shall include slumpstone block and mission cap as approved by the Planning Director. Pilasters located on privacy fencing shall be removed, except where visible from the public view. Fencing between residential units shall include a two-foot break in the plane as shown in figure 2-15 of thE! Specific Plan. Prior to the Issuance o.f Grading Permits 25. . The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. R:\Product ReviewlRoripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-QSS1\Resolution w ColA.doc 7 26. 27. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10' glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. . Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 28. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. 36. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for Tract Map 29353 (PA01-0230, A-Map), Tract Map 29661(PA01-0253, B-Map), and Ordinance No. 02-14, the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, including, but not limited to attachment "5", which requires various on and off-site improvements. The applicant shall submit street lighting and signage plans to the Planning Director for final approval. Street lighting shall comply with the Specific Plan, Riverside County Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program. Said lighting shall comply with the standards as set forth in the Mitigated Monitoring Program and install hoods or shields to prevent either spillage of lumens or reflections into the sky (lights must be downward facing). The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. . Prior to issuance of any residential building permit within Planning Area 3, the construction landscape and architectural plans for paseos (including hardscaping, landscaping, fencing, lights and gates), paseo gates staff gated primary entry, card key entry, and fuel modification zones shall be submitted and approved Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans. plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved, The developer shall demonstrate to the Building Official and/or the Planning Director that all homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recycled through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Services Department. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Codes; 1998 National Electrical . R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661 -3, PA03-0551\Resolution w ColAdoc 8 38. 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. . . . Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. 37. Obtain all buHding plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule for plan review. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calculations, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior to submittal of plans for plan review. Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Monday.. Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays Prior to the Issuance ,:>f Occupancy Permits 44. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 45. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 46. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex ~:tructures). 47. The developer :shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. R:\Product Review\Roripaugh Ranch SPlShea Homes Tr 29661-3, PA03-0661\Resolution w ColA.doc 9 48. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant Printed Name R:\Product ReviewlRortpaugh Ranch SP\Shea Homes Tr 29661-3. PA03-QSS1\Resolution w ColA.doc 10 . . .