Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
01062021 PC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JANUARY 6, 2021 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and /or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Planning Manager at stuart .fisk@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted . Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings . CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Turley-Trejo FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Watts ROLL CALL: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Planning Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda January 6, 2021 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action . 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of December 16, 2020Recommendation: Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS 2.Director's Hearing Summary Report Receive and FileRecommendation: Director's Hearing Summary ReportAttachments: 3.Appointment of Planning Commission Chairperson and Vice Chairperson for Calendar Year 2021 1.Appoint the Chairperson, effective January 1, 2021, to preside until December 31, 2021 2.Appoint the Vice Chairperson, effective January 1, 2021, to hold this office until December 31, 2021 3.Recognition of outgoing Chairperson Lanae Turely-Trejo Recommendation: Elect Chair and Vice Chair 2021Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before or during a public hearing in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) in the manner prescribed in the important notice at the top of the agenda. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Planning Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision. Said appeal must be filed within fifteen (15) calendar days after the Planning Commission’s decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. 4.Planning Application No. PA18-0661, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes; and PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road, Scott Cooper Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda January 6, 2021 Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-0661, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 321 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY CONSISTING OF DETACHED HOMES AND ATTACHED TOWNHOMES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DATE STREET AND YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-0662, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37509) FOR THE CREATION OF 111 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 31 CONDOMINIUM LOTS AND 9 OPEN SPACE LOTS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DATE STREET AND YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions - Development Plan Plan Reductions - Tentative Tract Map PC Resolution - Development Plan Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Fiscal Impact Analysis Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing.doc Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda January 6, 2021 PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, January 20, 2021, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Due to the closure of City Hall and other city facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the full agenda packet (Including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), will only be available for viewing on the City’s website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx at least 72 hours prior to meeting. If you have questions regarding an item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. Page 4 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA DECEMBER 16, 2020 - 6:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Planning Manager at stuart.fisk@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings. . CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairperson Turley-Trejo FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Guerriero ROLL CALL: Guerriero, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts, Youmans PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of December 2, 2020 Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Guerriero, Second by Youmans. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 2 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Planning Application No. PA20-0533, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 15,641 square foot industrial building located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado at the terminus of Terra Alta Way (APN: 909-290-001), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0533, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 15,641 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA ALVARADO AT THE TERMINUS OF TERRA ALTA WAY, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Youmans, Second by Guerriero. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 3. Planning Application No. PA20-0534, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 14,544 square foot industrial building located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 530 feet west of Terra Alta Way (APN: 909-290-004), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0534, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 14,544 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA ALVARADO APPROXIMATELY 530 FEET WEST OF TERRA ALTA WAY, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Youmans, Second by Guerriero. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 3 4. Planning Application No. PA20-0535, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 15,944 square foot industrial building located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 710 feet west of Terra Alta Way (APN: 909-290-005), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-42 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0535, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 15,944 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF AVENIDA ALVARADO APPROXIMATELY 710 FEET WEST OF TERRA ALTA WAY, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Youmans, Second by Guerriero. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 5. Planning Application No. PA20-0536, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 11,824 square foot industrial building located on the north side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 760 feet west of Terra Alta Way (APN: 909-290-057), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-0536, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 11,824 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUILDING LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF AVENIDA ALVARADO APPROXIMATELY 760 FEET WEST OF TERRA ALTA WAY, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTION 15332 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) GUIDELINES Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Youmans, Second by Guerriero. The vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT 4 ADJOURNMENT At 6:30 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, January 6, 2021, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson Luke Watson, Director of Community Development CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: January 6, 2021 SUBJECT: Director's Hearing Summary Report Community Development Director’s Agenda item(s) for December 2020. Date Case No. Proposal Applican t Action December 3, 2020 PA20-0783 A Resolution of the Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula Approving Planning Application No. PA20-0783, a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT for Epic Dog Academy to provide dog boarding, training and daycare services within the existing building located at 42346 Rio Nedo Road, Suites A, B, L, and Making a Finding of Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (APN 909-254-009) Olivia K. Smith APPROVED DH RESOLUTION NO. 2020-03 December 17, 2020 PA20-1006 A Resolution of the Director of Community Development of the City of Temecula Approving Planning Application No. PA20-1006, a CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT to allow for Tesla to conduct indoor auto sales within the existing building located at 43191 Rancho Way, and Making a Finding of Exemption under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (APN 921-040-042) Diana Tran APPROVED DH RESOLUTION NO. 2020-04 Attachments: Action Agendas ACTION AGENDA ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S HEARING MEETING Temecula City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 December 3, 2020 1:30 P.M. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed and/or online. Details can be found on temeculaca.gov/tv and/or online and not in person at City Hall. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Planning Manager at stuart.fisk@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Director of Community Development may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings. CALL TO ORDER at 1:30 PM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS: The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on an agendized item. • Chris Woods (1) • Mike Kalscheur (1) Item No. 1 1:30 PM Project Number: PA20-0783 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Epic Dog Academy CUP Applicant: Olivia K. Smith Project Description: Planning Application Number PA20-0783, a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Epic Dog Academy to provide dog boarding, training and daycare services within the existing building located at 42346 Rio Nedo Road, Suites A, B, L Environmental Action: Section 15301, Class Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Jaime Cardenas, Case Planner ACTION: APPROVED ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 1:39 PM ACTION AGENDA TEMECULA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR'S HEARING MEETING Temecula City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 December 17, 2020 1:30 P.M. IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with this order, the public may view/listen to the meeting online at https://temeculaca.gov/tv and not in person at City Hall. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at this meeting, please submit your comments by email to the Planning Manager at stuart.fisk@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be submitted prior to the Public Comments item being called. Email comments on an agenda item must be submitted prior to the close of public comments on that agenda item. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at noticed meetings. Electronic comments may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: Email comments will be read into the record, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Director of Community Development may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at noticed meetings. CALL TO ORDER at 1:32 PM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PUBLIC COMMENTS: None Item No. 1 1:30 PM Project Number: PA20-1006 Project Type: Conditional Use Permit Project Title: Tesla Auto Sales CUP Applicant: Diana Tran Project Description: Planning Application Number PA20-1006, Tesla Auto Sales CUP, a Conditional Use Permit to allow for Tesla to conduct indoor auto sales within the existing building located at 43191 Rancho Way Environmental Action: Section 15301, Class Class 1 Existing Facilities Project Planner: Jaime Cardenas, Case Planner ACTION: APPROVED ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned at 1:36 PM ELECT CHAIR AND VICE CHAIR a) Select nominations and vote for Chairperson to preside until December 31, 2021 b) Select nominations and vote for Vice Chairperson to hold this office until December 31, 2021 c) Recognition of outgoing Chairperson Lanae Turley- Trejo City of Temecula Planning Commission Meeting January 6, 2020 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: January 6, 2021 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA18-0661, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes; and PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: MLC Holdings, Inc. General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Harveston Specific Plan (SP-13) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Temecula Center Drive, Auto Dealership, Vacant Land / Service Commercial (SC) South: Date Street, Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) East: Ynez Road, Single Family Residential / Medium Density Residential (M), Low Medium Density Residential (LM) 2 West: Temecula Center Drive, Auto Dealership, Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI), Service Commercial (SC) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Parking Provided/Required: 833 Parking Spaces 747 Parking Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY On December 1, 2020 the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan was approved by the City of Temecula City Council. As part of that Specific Plan Amendment a Residential Overlay area was established which allows for the development of up to 1,000 residential units on an 87.54 acre portion of Planning Area 12. On May 7, 2018, MLC Holdings Inc. submitted Planning Application No. PA18-0661, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes; and PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. The project was presented to the City Council Ad Hoc Winchester Hills Subcommittee on November 14, 2017 and June 12, 2018 which at that time consisted of Council Members Jeff Comerchero and Mike Naggar. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project is located in the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan on 27.86 acres. The project proposes 150 single family homes within twenty-five 3-story, 6-plex townhome buildings, 60 single family homes within fifteen 2-story, 4-plex townhome buildings, and 111 single family detached homes. The vehicular access to the project is from two separate locations. The main entry which leads directly into the private recreation center is a right in, right out on Ynez Road and the secondary entry is a full movement access on Temecula Center Drive. Both entrances incorporate enhanced paving. Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the project is required to provide 747 parking spaces of which 642 are enclosed within a garage and 105 are uncovered. The project proposes 642 enclosed spaces and 191 uncovered spaces for a total of 833 parking spaces. Community Amenities Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the residents of residential projects developed within the Residential Overlay Area will not have access to the existing private recreational center within Harveston. Each residential development within the overlay shall provide private recreation areas. The project contains a profusion of community amenity spaces that include: 3 An approximately 1,134 square foot private recreation center building that includes a breezeway, restrooms, and great room/gathering space that is of a craftsman architectural style Pool area at the private recreation center that includes a spa, bbq area, and open turf play area Recreation area that includes a play structure, approximately 111’-0” long zip line, bbq with picnic area, and turf play area Dog run Recreation area that includes a tot lot, picnic area, bocce court, and ping pong tables Butterfly garden, paseo areas, and seating areas In addition to the community amenities the project also offers two different “loops” that can be used for walking and exercise along the sidewalks. There is an outer loop on the outside of the private loop road that is 0.60 miles and an inner loop on the inside of the private loop rood that is 0.54 miles long Waste Collection The applicant has prepared a Waste Collection Plan that ensures on waste collection day that the minimum number of parking spaces required by the Specific Plan are available. In order to accomplish this the project will provide one 60 gallon trash bin and one 60 gallon recycle bin per unit for a total of 642 bins and two community organics enclosures that contains two, three cubic yard bins. In addition, each residential unit is provided with a food scraps containers that may be emptied into the community organics enclosure. Video surveillance and signage are provided at the enclosures detailing that the organics bins are only for organic disposal and may be used for residential landscape waste. The Waste Collection Plan has been reviewed and approved by CR&R Environmental Services. Architecture The project proposes three (3) architectural styles throughout the project. The architectural styles include Spanish, Craftsman, and Cottage, which are consistent with the Residential Architectural Guidelines specified in the Harveston Specific Plan Design Guidelines. Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the Harveston Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance, are compatible with the surrounding residential neighborhoods, and provide variety along the streetscape and within the internal residential area. The applicant has provided specific details that are unique to each proposed architectural style and elevation. Each of the three proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials and with articulation provided on elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that work to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: Spanish: “S” shape concrete roof tiles, decorative Spanish stile, main hip roof with intersecting gable roofs, 4:12 roof pitch, and wrought iron 4 Craftsman: stone columns, porch, vertical upper mullioned windows with divided light, flat concrete tile roof, horizontal lap siding, and outlookers Cottage: horizontal lap siding, 6:12 roof pitch, shutters, stone entry elements, 12” roof overhangs, and flat concrete roof tiles Elevations located in an area that are visible to the public shall be enhanced. Instead of having specific enhanced elevations for the buildings located along Date Street, Ynez Road, Temecula Center Drive, and the internal loop road staff has worked with the applicant in order to ensure that the standard elevations are enhanced in order to provide a quality street scene along those corridors. Additional enhanced elevations are proposed on the single family detached project in specific locations where those elevations are visible to the public from recreation areas, public streets, and interior private streets. Landscaping While there is not a minimum landscape coverage percentage within the Residential Overlay the project does propose an abundance of landscaping within the landscape development zones along Date Street, Ynez Road, and Temecula Center Drive, in the recreational areas, along the parkways of the interior loop road and within the alleys in order to soften the massing of the buildings. Plant types used throughout the project include London Plane Trees, Bradford Pear, Strawberry Tree, Coast Live Oak, Silverberry, Daylily, Asian Jasmine, and Boston Ivy. Tentative Tract Map The Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) proposed the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots on 27.86 acres. Per the Harveston Specific Plan the Residential Overlay requires a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet and an average lot size of 2,500 square feet. The TTM proposed a minim lot size of 2,639 square feet and an average lot size of 2,989 square feet which exceed the minimum requirements of the overlay area. Growth Master Plan/Community Amenities On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Action Plan (GMP) which is intended to serve as the City Council’s policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures in the City of Temecula. The GMP applies when projects involve specific land use decisions including General Plan Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments. Consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the previously approved Specific Plan Amendment (PA18-0660) contains requirements for all future residential projects within the Residential Overlay to provide Community-wide public benefits that provide substantial added value to the entire community and citizens of Temecula commensurate with the scope of the project in order to fulfill the requirements of the City’s GMP. The Community-wide public benefit, as determined by the City Council Ad Hoc Winchester Hills Subcommittee, for the project is a $750,000.00 payment to the City of Temecula which will in turn be used by the Temecula Community Services Department for city-wide projects that benefit the residents of the City. The payment shall be made prior to the first certificate of occupancy for the project. Fiscal Impact Analysis The City’s fiscal policies requires that a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) be completed for any development that proposes an increase in residential density from what is currently allowed in 5 the General Plan. The previously approved General Plan Amendment (PA18-0659) changed the land use of the Residential Overlay from Service Commercial (SC) to Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) in order to allow for future residential development. However it was unknown, at the time, the size of the residential projects that would be proposed so it was not possible to prepare an FIA without individual projects to analyze. The Harveston Specific Plan, as amended, requires that any residential projects within the Residential Overlay prepare a FIA. The Harveston Specific Plan provides that the FIA is to evaluate the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the project by estimating the fiscal impact on the General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed project over a 20-year time period. If the FIA determines that the increased cost to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the project area will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the project (“City Services Deficit”), the project shall be conditioned to require the payment of funds to the City for negative impact on the General Fund, that is, the project shall be conditioned to pay the City the loss to General Fund revenues created by the project as determined by the FIA. Here, the applicant prepared a FIA in compliance with this requirement. The FIA found that the project would result in a City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of Four Hundred and One Dollars ($401.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of nine and four tenths percent (9.4%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Specific Plan area for which a building permit for residential construction has been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Twenty years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project , the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Community Meetings There were two community meetings in which the proposed project was presented to the surrounding property owners, residents of the Harveston community and Home Owner’s Association. The first community meeting was held on June 19, 2018 at which 12 people filled out sign-in sheets. The meeting was held in a charrette format with the applicant team providing information to the public, taking notes, and answering questions. The second community meeting was held on February 20, 2020 at which 41 people filled out sign-in sheets. The 6 applicant made a presentation based on the questions, concerns, and comments received from the previous meeting followed by a question and answer session. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the U-T San Diego on December 23, 2020 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03 -110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The applications for a development plan for a 321 unit single family residential community and tentative tract map for 111 single family lots, 31 condominium lots, and 9 open space lots are consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. 7 The proposed project consists of the construction of a single family residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a single family residential community at the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the Residential Overlay of the Harveston Specific Plan is 1,000. The proposed project proposes the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots, and 9 open space lots. As such, the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Harveston Specific Plan. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been subject to any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the 8 previously approved Residential Overlay within the Harveston Specific Plan which allows for 1,000 residential units. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 1,000 residential units with a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet and average lot area of 2,500 square feet. The Tentative Map proposes an average lot size of 2,989 square feet and a minimum lot size of 2,639 square feet. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone (EIR No. SCH# 2019070974). The SEIR identified seven (7) areas where no impacts were discovered. These areas are: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, and Wildfire. The analysis identified seven (7) areas where impacts were not considered to be significant. These areas include: Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems. The SEIR recommended feasible mitigation measures for environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact in the following areas: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted in connection with the SEIR. Consequently, the Tentative Map, which implements the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, based on the analysis in the SEIR. In addition, while the SEIR identified Air Quality as creating significant and unavoidable impacts, in accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted stating that the significant adverse project effects are acceptable because the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the City Council adopted Findings of Facts in Support of Findings that identify that, with respect to Air Quality, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR. The Findings of Fact in Support of Findings are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Because the Tentative Map implements the Harveston Specific Plan as amended, these same considerations and findings apply here. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious pu blic health problems. 9 The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions – Development Plan 3. Plan Reductions – Tentative Tract Map 4. PC Resolution – Development Plan 5. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 6. PC Resolution – Tentative Tract Map 7. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 8. Fiscal Impact Analysis 9. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental- Review-CEQA 10. Notice of Determination 11. Notice of Public Hearing A M E S B U R Y L N L O C K HAVEN CT PLYMOUTHWYCHARLESBURGDRCLARIONCTBRAN D O N LN Q UIN CYLN WAVERLYLNMEDFORDRDYNEZRD ANSELM O W Y DATEST§¨¦15 Proj ect Site Ci ty of Temecula PA18-0661 This m ap w as made by the C ity of Temecul a Geographi c Inform ati on System .The m ap is deriv ed fr om base data pr oduc ed by the Ri versi de County Assessor'sDepartment and the Transportation and Land M anagem ent Agency of Ri versi deCounty. T he C ity of Tem ec ul a ass um es no warr anty or l egal responsi bi l i ty for theinformation contained on thi s m ap. Data and i nform ati on represented on thi s m apare s ubj ec t to update and m odi fication. The Geographi c Inform ati on System andother sourc es shoul d be quer ied for the m ost current i nform ati on.This m ap i s not for r epr i nt or resal e. 0 500250Feet N HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA 12/15/2020 #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 A-1 A-2 A-3 A-4 A-5 A-6 A-7 A-8 A-9 A-10 A-11 A-12 A-13 A-14 A-15 A-16 A-17 A-18 A-19 A-20 A-21 A-22 A-23 A-24 A-25 A-26 A-27 A-28 A-29 A-30 A-31 A-32 A-33 A-34 A-35 A-36 A-37 A-38 A-39 A-40 A-41 A-42 A-43 A-44 A-45 A-46 A-47 A-48 A-49 L-1 L-2 L-3 L-4 L-5 L-6 L-7 L-8 L-9 L-10 L-11 L-12 C-1 C-2 C-3 C-4 C-5 C-6 C-7 C-8 P-1 P-2 PROJECT SUMMARY CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN CONCEPTUAL WASTE COLLECTION PLAN WASTE COLLECTION DAY OVERFLOW PARKING STALL TURNING MOVEMENTS PRELIMINARY ELEVATION AND COLOR ASSIGNMENTS THREE STORY TOWNHOMES (6 PLEX) STREET SCENE FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR FLOOR PLAN - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR SPANISH FRONT ELEVATION SPANISH SIDES AND REAR ELEVATION SPANISH LEFT ENHANCED ELEVATION COTTAGE FRONT ELEVATION COTTAGE SIDES AND REAR ELEVATION COTTAGE LEFT ENHANCED ELEVATION TWO STORY TOWNHOMES (4 PLEX) STREET SCENE FLOOR PLAN - FIRST FLOOR FLOOR PLAN - SECOND FLOOR COTTAGE FRONT ELEVATION COTTAGE SIDES AND REAR ELEVATION CRAFTSMAN FRONT ELEVATION CRAFTSMAN SIDES AND REAR ELEVATION SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER FLOOR PLANS STREET ELEVATIONS STREET SCENE PLAN 1 - FLOOR PLANS PLAN 1 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 1 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 1 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS PLAN 1 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 2 - FLOOR PLANS PLAN 2 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS PLAN 2 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 2 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS PLAN 2 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 2 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS PLAN 2 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 3 - FLOOR PLANS PLAN 3 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS PLAN 3 "A" - SPANISH ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 3 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS PLAN 3 "B" - COTTAGE ELEVATIONS ENHANCED PLAN 3 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS PLAN 3 "C" - CRAFTSMAN ELEVATIONS ENHANCED COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER FLOOR PLAN ELEVATIONS COLOR BOARDS - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES COLOR BOARDS - 2 STORY TOWNHOMES COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - SPANISH COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - COTTAGE COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - CRAFTSMAN COLOR BOARDS - COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER GARAGE AND DOOR DETAILS PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT PRELIMINARY STREET SECTIONS OPEN SPACE PLAN CONNECTIVITY PLAN WALL AND FENCE PLAN KIDS PLAY AREAS MAILBOX STRUCTURES SITE FURNISHINGS SITE FURNISHINGS TITLE SHEET AND SECTIONS PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PRELIMINARY WET UTILITY PLAN TRASH EXHIBIT PHOTOMETRICS PHOTOMETRICS INDEX #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PROJECT SUMMARY HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA S-1PA-18-0661 Nov 2020 Project Summary Property Information • APN: 916-400-034, 916-400-035-2 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 • Street Address: None • Existing Land Use: Vacant • Proposed Land Use: Residential • General Plan Designation: SPI • Zoning Designation: SP • Existing Specific Plan Designation: Service Commercial with Residential Overlay • Property Owner: The Stephen Bieri Company, Inc. Contact: Stephen Bieri P.O. Box 270159 San Diego, CA 92198-2159 Ph: (858) 376-2900 Building Type and Plan Mix SFA - 3-Story Townhomes (6-plex) - 25 Buildings • Plan 1 (1387 SF, 2 bedrooms): 50 homes • Plan 2 (1698SF, 3 bedrooms): 50 Homes • Plan 3 (1893 SF, 4 bedrooms): 25 Homes • Plan 3X (1893 SF, 4 bedrooms): 25 Homes • Total: 150 Homes SFA - 2-Story Townhomes (4-plex) - 15 Buildings • Plan 1 (1495 SF, 3 bedrooms): 30 homes • Plan 2 (1709 SF, 4 bedrooms): 30 homes • Total: 60 homes SFD - Single Family Homes • Plan 1 (1740 SF, 3 bedrooms): 36 homes • Plan 2 (1889 SF, 3 bedrooms): 38 homes • Plan 3 (2176 SF, 4 bedrooms): 37 homes • Total: 111 homes Project Summary • Total Net Site Area: 25.40 Acres • Density:12.6 Homes/acre • Number of Homes: 321 Homes • Building Coverage: 328,496 SF • Gross Building Area: 434,769 SF • FAR: 0.39 • Occupancy: R-3 • Type of Construction: V-B • Sprinkler System: NFPA 13D • Number of Stories 2-3 Open Space Summary Common Open Space Required per SP: 250 per unit x 321 = 80,250 SF Common Open Space Provided (See Sheet L-6): 317,470 (989 SF per Unit)/7.29 Acres Private Open Space Required per SP: • SFD: Min. 250 SF per unit • SFA: Min. 150 SF per unit Private Open Space Provided: SFA - 3-Story Townhomes (Minimum)* - See Floorplans: • Plan 1: 60 SF Deck + 160 SF Patio = 220 SF • Plan 2: 66 SF Deck + 160 SF Patio = 292 SF • Plan 3: 100 SF Deck + 160 SF Patio = 260 SF • Plan 3x: 100 SF Deck + 160 SF Patio = 260 SF SFA - 2-Story Townhomes (Minimum)* - See Floorplans: • 25’ x 10’ Rear Yard = 292 SF SFD - Single Family Homes (Minimum)- See C-Sheets* • Plan 1: 10’ x 44’ Rear Yard = 440 SF • Plan 2: 10’ x 39’ Rear Yard = 390 SF • Plan 3: 10’ x 43’ Rear Yard = 430 SF *Note: Private open space areas are larger for some units depending upon location. https://openstreetmap.org/copyright https://openstreetmap.org Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license https://openstreetmap.org/copyright https://openstreetmap.org Copyright OpenStreetMap and contributors, under an open license Vicinity Map Minimum Parking Spaces Required by Specific Plan Specific Plan Requirement per Unit Total Units Total Required Enclosed Uncovered Enclosed Uncovered Total SFD 2 0 111 222 0 222 SFA 2 0.5 210 420 105 525 Total 321 642 105 747 Parking Spaces Provided (See Sheets S-2 for locations) Garage Spaces per Unit Total Units Enclosed Spaces Uncovered Spaces Total Spaces Total on Waste Collection Day (See Sheet S-3) SFD 2 111 222 0 222 222 SFA 2 210 420 0 420 420 Parallel (8’x22’) -- -- -- 121 121 44 Stalls (9’x18’) -- -- --70 70 70 Total 642 191 833 756 Development Standards (Per Table 11.6 unless otherwise specified) Lot Size/Density Specific Requirement Proposed (See Sheet S-1) Minimum Lot Area per DU 2000 SF (Air Space Condos (SFA) Exempt; May be Varied for Cluster Projects SFD: 2640 SF Average Lot Area per DU 2500 SF (Air Space Condos (SFA) Exempt; May be Varied for Cluster Projects SFD: 2960 SF Dwelling Units per Net Acre 7-20 12.6 Lot Dimensions Note: Applies to SFD only; May be Varied for Cluster Projects Minimum Lot Width at Front Property Line 30 60’ Measured at Street Frontage Average Lot Width 50 60’ Measured at Street Frontage Minimum Lot Depth 40 44’ Measured at Alley Frontage Setbacks Date Street Perimeter Wall per SP Figure 10.1-2 25’ from face of curb (13’ from right-of-way) 25’ from face of curb (13’ from right-of-way) Buildings (Minimum Development Perimeter per Table 11.6) 5’ from Property Line to main structure*10’ from Property Line Ynez Road Perimeter Wall per SP Figure 10.1-3 25’ from face of curb (13’ from right-of-way) 25’ from face of curb (13’ from right-of-way) Buildings (Minimum Development Perimeter per Table 11.6) 5’ from Property Line to main structure*10’ from Property Line Temecula Center Drive Perimeter Wall per SP Figure 10.1-21 20’ from face of curb (9’ from right-of-way) 20’ from face of curb (9’ from right-of-way) Buildings (Minimum Development Perimeter per Table 11.6) 5’ from Property Line to main structure*5’ from Property Line Residential Entry per SP Figure 10.1-12 (Walls and Buildings)8’ from Back of Walk 8’ from Back of Walk Interior Lot Setbacks (per table SP Table 11.6), including Private Loop Road. 5’ from Property Line 5’ from Property Line Maximum Height 3-Story SFA: 50’ 36’4” and 39’2” 2-Story SFA: 30’6” and 27’1.5” SFD 25’4” - 28’11’ * Patios, porches, entrances, architectural pop-outs and utility closets may be setback a minimum of 3 feet Design Team • Applicant: MLC Holdings Contact: Aaron Talarico 5 Peters Canyon Road Suite 310 Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: 949-372-3309 • Architect: Kevin L. Crook Architects, Inc. Contact: Jeff Addison 1360 Reynolds Avenue Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92614 Ph: (949)660-1587 • Civil Engineers Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Contact: Steven M. Cook, P.E., LEED AP Ph. 949-988-5815 • Landscape Architect: BGB | DESIGN GROUP Contact: Jeff Kraus 3185 C1 Airway Ave Costa Mesa, CA 92626 Ph: 714-545-2898 • Photometric: Candella Engineering, Inc. Contact: Don DiDomizio 27201 Calle Juanita Dana Point, CA 92624 Ph: 949-201-1333 Not to Scale Project Location #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 S-1 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA Jun 2020 S-2PA-18-0661 Conceptual Site Plan Legend 3-Story Townhomes 2-Story Townhomes SFD Homes 4-Foot Walk 5-Foot Min. Walk Parallel Parking Space (8’x22’) 90° Parking Stall (9’x18’) Community Amenity Spaces A - Swimming Pool, Spa, BBQ Area, Community Building, and Open Turf Play Area B - Play Structure, Zip Line, BBQ with Picnic Area, and Open Turf Play Area. C - Tot Lot, Fire Pit, Picnic Area, Bocce Court, and Ping Pong Tables D - Off-Leash Dog Run E - Butterfly Garden, Turf Area, and Focal Point Feature with seating area F - Mailbox Kiosk G - Landscaped Paseo Areas H - Passive Seating Area D C A E G G G G G G G G G G B F-3 F-1 F-2 A H Monument Wall Signs Monument Wall Signs * Organics Enclosure Organics Enclosure #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 S-2 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA CONCEPTUAL WASTE COLLECTION PLAN HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA Jun 2020 S-3PA-18-0661 Conceptual Waste Collection Plan Temecula Center Drive Ynez Road Da t e S t r e e tBuilding 117 A2-story THBuilding 1162-story THBuilding 117B2-story THBuilding 118A2-story THBuilding 118B2-story THBuilding 119A2-story THBuilding 120A2-story THBuilding 120B2-story THBuilding 12 1 3-story TH Bui ld ing 1152-story THBui ld ing 114A2-story THBui ld ing 114B2-story THBui ld ing 113A2-story THBui ld ing 113B2-story THBui ld ing 112A2-story THBui ld ing 112B2-story THLot 1SFD P1 Lot 2SFD P2 Lot 5SFD P2 Lot 4SFD P1 Lot 3SFD P3 Lot 8SFD P2 Lot 7SFD P1 Lot 6SFD P3 Lot 11SFD P2 Lot 10SFD P1 Lot 9SFD P3 Lot 12SFD P3 Lot 13SFD P1 Lot 14SFD P2 Lot 17SFD P2 Lot 16SFD P1 Lot 15SFD P3 Lot 23SFD P2 Lot 22SFD P1 Lot 21SFD P3 Lot 26SFD P2 Lot 25SFD P1 Lot 24SFD P3 Lot 27SFD P3 Lot 28SFD P1 Lot 29SFD P2Lot 18SFD P3 Lot 19SFD P1 Lot 20SFD P2 Lot 30 SFD P2 Lot 31 SFD P2 Lot 34 SFD P3 Lot 33 SFD P2 Lot 32 SFD P2 Lot 35 SFD P2 Lot 36 SFD P2 Lot 37 SFD P3 Lot 40 SFD P3 Lot 39 SFD P2 Lot 38 SFD P2 Lot 41 SFD P2 Lot 42 SFD P2 Lot 43 SFD P3 Lot 46 SFD P3 Lot 45 SFD P2 Lot 44 SFD P2 Lot 47 SFD P2 Lot 48 SFD P2 Lot 49 SFD P3 Lot 52 SFD P3 Lot 51 SFD P2 Lot 50 SFD P2 Lot 53 SFD P1 Lot 54 SFD P1 Lot 55 SFD P3 Lot 56 SFD P2 Lot 57 SFD P1 Lot 58 SFD P3 Lot 59 SFD P2 Lot 60 SFD P1 Lot 61 SFD P3Lot 62 SFD P2 Lot 63 SFD P1 Lot 64 SFD P3 Lot 65 SFD P2 Lot 66 SFD P1 Lot 67 SFD P3Lot 68 SFD P2 Lot 69 SFD P1 Lot 70 SFD P3 Lot 73 SFD P3 Lot 72 SFD P1 Lot 71 SFD P2Lot 76 SFD P3 Lot 75 SFD P1 Lot 74 SFD P2 Lot 79 SFD P3 Lot 78 SFD P1 Lot 77 SFD P2 Lot 82 SFD P3 Lot 81 SFD P1 Lot 80 SFD P2 Lot 85 SFD P3 Lot 84 SFD P1 Lot 83 SFD P2 Lot 86 SFD P2 Lot 87 SFD P3 Lot 89 SFD P3 Lot 88 SFD P2 Lot 111 SFD P3 Lot 110 SFD P1 Lot 109 SFD P2 Lot 108 SFD P3 Lot 107 SFD P1 Lot 106 SFD P2 Lot 105 SFD P3 Lot 104 SFD P1 Lot 103 SFD P2 Lot 102 SFD P3 Lot 101 SFD P1 Lot 100 SFD P2 Lot 99 SFD P3 Lot 98 SFD P1 Lot 97 SFD P2 Lot 96 SFD P3 Lot 95 SFD P1 Lot 94 SFD P2 Lot 91 SFD P3 Lot 90 SFD P2 Lot 93 SFD P3 Lot 92 SFD P2 Building 122 3-story TH Building 123 3-story TH Building 1243-story TH Building 1253-story TH Building 1263-story THBuilding 1273-story THBuilding 1283-story THBuilding 1293-story THBuilding 1303-story THBuilding 1313-story THBuilding 1323-story THBuilding 133A3-story THBuilding 134B3-story THBuilding 134A3-story THBuilding 134B3-story THBuilding 135A3-story THBuilding 135B3-story THBuilding 1363-story THBuilding 1373-story THBuilding 1383-story THBuild ing 1393-s to ry THBuild ing 1403-s to ry THBu i l d i n g 1 4 1 3 - s t o r y TH Bu i l d i n g 1 4 2 3 - s t o r y TH GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.* ** ******** *** *** *********** ** *********** **** ** ** ** ** ** **** * * * * * * ** * ** 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 70 6968 67 66 65 64 63 626160 21 22 23 20 24 25 26 27 31 32 29 28 30 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 33 34 35 36 37 38 3940 41 42 4344 48 47 4645 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1718192021222324252627 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 34 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Heirloom Temecula, California July 14, 2019 Legend Trash Cart - 321 total (1 per unit) - See Detail A Recycle Cart - 321 total ( per unit) - See Detail A Organics Enclosures - See Detail B (two 3-yard bins per Enclosure) Parallel Parking Space Available on Collection Day = 44 Spaces Parking Stall Available on Collection Day = 70 Spaces Notes: 1. Video surveillance, signage and literature for residents shall be provided detailing that the organics bins are for organic disposal only.Organics enclosures may be used for residential landscape waste. 2. "No Parking" on collection day shall be enforced through signage and fines. 0 25 50 100 Scale: 1" = 50' * 12" 27"33"60 GAL. RECYCLE 60 GAL. TRASH 27"33"Detail A: Typical Individual Bin Staging Face of Curb 6"4'1"1'3CY Bin 4'4'1"1'6'9" 1' 3CY Bin 1' 6'9" Pedestrian Access Truck Access Detail B: Typical Organics Enclosure Each unit to be provided with a Food Scraps container that may be periodically emptied at the Organics Enclosure. Parking Summary Garage Spaces per Unit Total Units Enclosed Spaces Uncovered Spaces Total Spaces Total Available on Waste Collection Day SFD 2 111 222 0 222 222 SFA 2 210 420 0 420 420 Parallel (8’x22’) -- -- -- 121 121 44 Stalls (9’x18’) -- -- --70 70 70 Total 642 191 833 756 Minimum Parking Spaces Required by Specific Plan Specific Plan Requirement per Unit Total Units Total Required Enclosed Uncovered Enclosed Uncovered Total SFD 2 0 111 222 0 222 SFA 2 0.5 210 420 105 525 Total 321 642 105 747 #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 S-3 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA WASTE COLLECTION DAY OVERFLOW PARKING STALL TURNING MOVEMENTSHEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA Jun 2020 S-4PA-18-0661 Waste Collection Day Overflow Parking Stall Turning Movements 1 2 3 4 R16.0'R25.4'R22.2'R16.2'R16.1'R24.5'R62.9' R57.5' Heirloom Farms Temecula, California 0 15 30 Scale: 1" = 30' Application No.: PA18-0660 Submittal No.: 4TH Submittal October 17, 2019 Applicant: MLC Holdings, Inc. N Loop Road Turning Movement DiagramMotor CourtNot to Scale 9'x18' Parking Stall Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Composite Passenger Vehicle 6.0 6.33 6.33 9.423.00 16.75 Steering Angle 26.4: Plan view of Composite Passenger Vehicle's turning movements to exit parking stall and exit motor court Movement 1 Movement 2 Movement 4Movement 3All Movements Combined 5.0'10.0'Temecula Center Drive Ynez Road Da t e S t r e e tBuilding 117 A2-story THBuilding 1162-story THBuilding 117B2-story THBuilding 118A2-story THBuilding 118B2-story THBuilding 119A2-story THBuilding 120A2-story THBuilding 120B2-story THBuilding 121 3-story TH Bui ld ing 1152-story THBui ld ing 114A2-story THBui ld ing 114B2-story THBui ld ing 113A2-story THBui ld ing 113B2-story THBui ld ing 112A2-story THBui ld ing 112B2-story THLot 1SFD P1 Lot 2SFD P2 Lot 5SFD P2 Lot 4SFD P1 Lot 3SFD P3 Lot 8SFD P2 Lot 7SFD P1 Lot 6SFD P3 Lot 11SFD P2 Lot 10SFD P1 Lot 9SFD P3 Lot 12SFD P3 Lot 13SFD P1 Lot 14SFD P2 Lot 17SFD P2 Lot 16SFD P1 Lot 15SFD P3 Lot 23SFD P2 Lot 22SFD P1 Lot 21SFD P3 Lot 26SFD P2 Lot 25SFD P1 Lot 24SFD P3 Lot 27SFD P3 Lot 28SFD P1 Lot 29SFD P2Lot 18SFD P3 Lot 19SFD P1 Lot 20SFD P2 Lot 30 SFD P2 Lot 31 SFD P2 Lot 34 SFD P3 Lot 33 SFD P2 Lot 32 SFD P2 Lot 35 SFD P2 Lot 36 SFD P2 Lot 37 SFD P3 Lot 40 SFD P3 Lot 39 SFD P2 Lot 38 SFD P2 Lot 41 SFD P2 Lot 42 SFD P2 Lot 43 SFD P3 Lot 46 SFD P3 Lot 45 SFD P2 Lot 44 SFD P2 Lot 47 SFD P2 Lot 48 SFD P2 Lot 49 SFD P3 Lot 52 SFD P3 Lot 51 SFD P2 Lot 50 SFD P2 Lot 53 SFD P1 Lot 54 SFD P1 Lot 55 SFD P3 Lot 56 SFD P2 Lot 57 SFD P1 Lot 58 SFD P3 Lot 59 SFD P2 Lot 60 SFD P1 Lot 61 SFD P3Lot 62 SFD P2 Lot 63 SFD P1 Lot 64 SFD P3 Lot 65 SFD P2 Lot 66 SFD P1 Lot 67 SFD P3Lot 68 SFD P2 Lot 69 SFD P1 Lot 70 SFD P3 Lot 73 SFD P3 Lot 72 SFD P1 Lot 71 SFD P2Lot 76 SFD P3 Lot 75 SFD P1 Lot 74 SFD P2 Lot 79 SFD P3 Lot 78 SFD P1 Lot 77 SFD P2Lot 82 SFD P3 Lot 81 SFD P1 Lot 80 SFD P2 Lot 85 SFD P3 Lot 84 SFD P1 Lot 83 SFD P2 Lot 86 SFD P2 Lot 87 SFD P3 Lot 89 SFD P3 Lot 88 SFD P2 Lot 111 SFD P3 Lot 110 SFD P1 Lot 109 SFD P2 Lot 108 SFD P3 Lot 107 SFD P1 Lot 106 SFD P2 Lot 105 SFD P3 Lot 104 SFD P1 Lot 103 SFD P2 Lot 102 SFD P3 Lot 101 SFD P1 Lot 100 SFD P2 Lot 99 SFD P3 Lot 98 SFD P1 Lot 97 SFD P2 Lot 96 SFD P3 Lot 95 SFD P1 Lot 94 SFD P2 Lot 91 SFD P3 Lot 90 SFD P2 Lot 93 SFD P3 Lot 92 SFD P2 Building 122 3-story TH Building 123 3-story TH Building 1243-story TH Building 1253-story TH Building 1263-story THBuilding 1273-story THBuilding 1283-story THBuilding 1293-story THBuilding 1303-story THBuilding 1313-story THBuilding 1323-story THBuilding 133A3-story THBuilding 134B3-story THBuilding 134A3-story THBuilding 134B3-story THBuilding 135A3-story THBuilding 135B3-story THBuilding 1363-story THBuilding 1373-story THBuild ing 1383-story THBuild ing 1393-s to ry THBuild ing 1403-s to ry THBu i l d i n g 1 4 1 3 - s t o r y TH Bu i l d i n g 1 4 2 3 - s t o r y TH GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.Existing Single Family Detached Homes (SP-13: Medium 2) Existing SFD Homes (SP-13: Medium 2) Vacant (SP-13: Service Commercial) Existing Auto Dealerships (SP-13: Service Commercial)Vacant (SP-13: Service Commercial with Residential Overlay) Vacant (SP-13: Service Commercial with Residential Overlay) Heirloom Temecula, California July 5, 2019 0 25 50 100 Scale: 1" = 50' 1 2 3 4 R16.0'R25.4'R22.2'R16.2'R16.1'R24.5'R62.9' R57.5' Heirloom Farms Temecula, California 0 15 30 Scale: 1" = 30' Application No.: PA18-0660 Submittal No.: 4TH Submittal October 17, 2019 Applicant: MLC Holdings, Inc. N Loop Road Turning Movement DiagramMotor CourtNot to Scale 9'x18' Parking Stall Lock to Lock Time Width Track : : : feet Composite Passenger Vehicle 6.0 6.33 6.33 9.423.00 16.75 Steering Angle26.4: Plan view of Composite Passenger Vehicle's turning movements to exit parking stall and exit motor court Movement 1 Movement 2 Movement 4Movement 3All Movements Combined Location of overflow parking stalls on waste collection day (26 stalls total)#19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 S-4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PRELIMINARY ELEVATION AND COLOR ASSIGNMENTS HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA Jun 2020 S-5PA-18-0661 Preliminary Elevation and Color Assignments Legend Enhanced Elevations Spanish Elevations 3-Story Townhome Scheme 1 SFD Scheme 1 SFD Scheme 2 SFD Scheme 3 Cottage Elevations 3-Story Townhome Scheme 2 2-Story Townhome Scheme 1 SFD Scheme 4 SFD Scheme 5 SFD Scheme 6 Craftsman Elevations 2-Story Townhome Scheme 2 SFD Scheme 7 SFD Scheme 8 SFD Scheme 9 #19025PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 S-5 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-13 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-23 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-33 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-43 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-53 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-63 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-73 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-83 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-93 STORY TOWNHOMES PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-10 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-11 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-12 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-13 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-14 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-15 #190252 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-16 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-17 B #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-18 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-19 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-20 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-21 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-22 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-23 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-24 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-25 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-26 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-27 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-28 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-29 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-30 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-31 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-32 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-33 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-34 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-35 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-36 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-37 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-38 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-39 #19025SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-40 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-41 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA #1902512/15/2020 A-42 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - 3 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOOM FARMS 3 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CAJUNE 25, 2019 #19025 SPANISH SCHEME #1 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIMSECONDARY STUCCOGARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2GABLE END DETAILWROUGHT IRONHEIRLOOM FARMS 3 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CAJUNE 25, 2019 #19025 COTTAGE SCHEME #2 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLESSECONDARY STUCCOGARAGE DOORRAILINGSFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-43 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - 2 STORY TOWNHOMES HEIRLOOM FARMS 2 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CAJUNE 25, 2019 #19025 COTTAGE SCHEME #1 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLESSECONDARY STUCCOGARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2HEIRLOOM FARMS 2 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CAJUNE 25, 2019 #19025 CRAFTSMAN SCHEME #2 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORSECONDARY STUCCOBOARD & BATTEN SIDINGFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-44 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - SPANISH HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 SPANISH SCHEME #1 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSGABLE END DETAILWROUGHT IRONDECORATIVE TILE HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 SPANISH SCHEME #2 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSGABLE END DETAILWROUGHT IRONDECORATIVE TILE HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 SPANISH SCHEME #3 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSGABLE END DETAILWROUGHT IRONDECORATIVE TILE COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-45 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - COTTAGE HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 COTTAGE SCHEME #4 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORGABLE SIDINGFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSHEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 COTTAGE SCHEME #5 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORGABLE SIDINGFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSHEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 COTTAGE SCHEME #6 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOORGABLE SIDINGFRONT DOOR / SHUTTERSCOLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-46 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - SINGLE FAMILY CLUSTER - CRAFTSMAN HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 CRAFTSMAN SCHEME #7 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIMGABLE SIDING / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR STONE HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 CRAFTSMAN SCHEME #8 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIMGABLE SIDING / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR STONE HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CAJAN. 07, 2020 #19025 CRAFTSMAN SCHEME #9 ROOFSTUCCO BODYFASCIA / TRIMGABLE SIDING / GARAGE DOORFRONT DOOR STONE COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-47 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA COLOR BOARDS - COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER HEIRLOOM FARMS REC BUILDING TEMECULA, CAJUNE 20, 2019 #19025 ROOFMAIN BODY - SHINGLE SIDINGFASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLESTILE AT SHOWERS STONEDOORS COLORS MAY VARY DUE TO SCREEN AND PRINTER CALIBRATION. REFER TO PAINT CHIPS AND MATERIALS BOARDS FOR ACTUAL COLORS.#1902512/15/2020 A-48 PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 GARAGE AND DOOR DETAILS GARAGE DOORS WAYNE DALTON NEWPORT SMOOTH STAR S8200 SMOOTH STAR S810 WESTFIELD PROVIDENCE WESTFIELD LEXINGTON DOORS THERMA TRU #19025HEIRLOОM FARMS TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 SUBMITTAL #4 ©: ALL RIGHTS RESERVED 2019 12/15/2020 A-49 TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico L10 feet100 SCALE: 1" = 50' 50 150 200 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN YNEZ ROAD DATE S TREE T DRIVECENTERTEMECULA TREES LIST BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME YNEZ ROAD TREES Existing Lagerstroemia species (Parkway) Crape Myrtle Chitalpa tashkentensis ‘Morning Cloud’ Chitalpa Pinus eldarica Afgan Pine DATE STREET TREES Existing Platanus acerifolia (Parkway) London Plane Chitalpa tashkentensis ‘Morning Cloud’ Chitalpa Pinus eladrica Afgan Pine TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE TREES Platanus acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’ (Parkway) London Plane Tree Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine Pyrus calleryana ‘Bradford’ Bradford Pear VINES & ESPALIERS Parthenocissus tricuspidata Boston Ivy Wisteria sinensis Chinese Wisteria GROUNDCOVER TURF LAWN MARATHON II SHRUBS LIST BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Agapanthus africanus Lily-of-the-Nile Agave desmettiana ‘Variegata’ Variegated Dwarf Century Plant Anigozanthos hybrids ‘Bush Gold’ Dwarf Kangaroo Paw (Yellow) Arbutus unedo ‘Elfin King’ Elfin King Strawberry King Buxus microphylla japonica Japanese Boxwood Callistemon viminalis ‘Little John’ Dwarf Bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis ‘Slim’ Slim Bottlebrush Carex tumulicola Foothill Sedge Dianella revoluta ‘DR5000’ Little Rev Flax Lily Dianella tamanica ‘Silver Streak’ Silver Streak Flax Lily Dietes bicolor Fortnight Lily Elaeagnus pungens Silverberry Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava Festuca glauca Blue Fescue Hemerocallis ‘Dwarf Red’ Daylilly Ilex crenata ‘Sky Pencil’ Sky Pencil Ilex Lantana hybrids ‘New Gold’ New Gold Lantana Ligustrum japonica ‘Texanum’ Wax Leaf Privet Lomandra longifolia ‘LM300’ Breeze Dwarf Mat Rush Phormium cookianum Green Flax Pittosporum tobira Tobira Podocarpus elongatus ‘Monmal’ Icee Blue Yellow-Wood BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Prunus caroliniana ‘Compacta’ Compact Laurel Cherry Punica granatum ‘Nana’ Dwarf Pomegranate Rhaphiolepis indica ‘Clara’ Dwarf Indian Hawthorne Rhaphiolepis x. ‘Montic’ Majestic Beauty Indian Hawthorn Rosa ‘Flower Carpet var. Noatraum’ Pink Carpet Rose Rosa f. ‘Ice Berg’ White Shrub Rose Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Huntington Carpet’ Huntington Rosemary Carpet Rosmarinus officinalis ‘Tuscan Blue’ Tuscan Blue Rosemary Trachelospermum asiaticum Asian Jasmine BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME INTERIOR DEVELOPMENT AREA TREES Magnolia grandiflora ‘Little Gem’ Little Gem Magnolia Pyrus calleryana ‘Chanticleer’ Chanticleer Pear Rhus lancea African Sumac Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Platanus acerifolia ‘Bloodgood’ London Plane Tree Lagerstroemia indica Crape Myrtle Olea europaea Olive Pinus eldarica Afghan Pine Podocarpus gracilior Fern Pine Rhus lancea African Sumac Koelreuteria bipinnata Chinese Flame Tree Schinus molle California Pepper Tree Geijera parvifolia Australian Willow Arbutus ‘Marina’ Strawberry Tree Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak 1 LEGEND CITY NOTES MAIN ENTRY MULCH NOTE: 3” OF MEDIUM GRADE BARK MULCH REQUIRED UNDER ALL PLANT MATERIAL. IN AREAS WITH GROUNDCOVER PLANTED FROM FLATS, THE MULCH DEPTH SHALL BE NO LESS THAN ONE AND ONE-HALF INCHES. FIELD OBSERVATION NOTE: CITY OF TEMECULA REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION: A MINIMUM OF THREE INSPECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED PER CONSTRUCTION PHASING. THE FIRST IS AN IRRIGATION INSPECTION TO VERIFY PIPE DEPTHS AND IRRIGATION MATERIAL CONFORMANCE. THE SECOND IS A LANDSCAPE INSPECTION TO VERIFY IRRIGATION COVERAGE AND OPERATION, AND TO VERIFY THAT ALL PLANTINGS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THE THIRD IS A FINAL INSPECTION ONCE MULCH HAS BEEN LAID AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE IN PLACE. CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SCHEDULE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONS. SITE PLAN CALCULATIONS ENTIRE SITE AREA: 1,155,665 SQ. FT. EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREA: 12,855 SQ. FT. PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA: 224,870 SQ. FT. LANDSCAPE AREA IN R.O.W.: 43,202 SQ. FT. BIOSWALE / WQMP AREA: 9,324 SQ. FT. TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA: 290,251 SQ. FT. 2 SECONDARY ENTRY 3 RECREATIONAL AREA POOL : 1,932 SF POOL AREA: 11,046 SF 4 KIDS PLAY AREA ‘A’ 5 KIDS PLAY AREA ‘A’ - ZIPLINE 6 KIDS PLAY AREA ‘B’ 7 PING PONG TABLES 8 BBQ AREA 9 DOG RUN 10 BUTTERFLY GARDEN 11 RESIDENTIAL PASSIVE AREAS 12 TYPICAL COURTYARD LAYOUT 13 TURF 14 BIOSWALE 15 MAILBOX KIOSK AREA ‘A’ MAILBOX KIOSK AREA ‘B’ MAILBOX KIOSK AREA ‘C’ 16 EXISTING PARKWAYS ON YNEZ ROAD - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE 17 18 19 EXISTING PARKWAYS ON DATE STREET - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE 20 18” STEP OUTS - TYPICAL 1 2 12 12 3 13 14 14 11 10 4 17 20 20 5 19 19 18 18 16 8 9 11 6 157 12 BIOSWALE SHRUBS LIST BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME Carex praegracilis California Field Sedge Lomandra longifolia ‘LM300’ Breeze Dwarf Mat Rush Muhlenbergia capilarius Pink Muhly Grass Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 20 20 20 20 20 20 GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.13 13 1 7 3 15 2 4 9 8 10 11 12 12 12 14 14 16 17 19 19 18 18 6 5 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 YNEZ ROAD EXISTING TURF PARKWAY WITH CRAPE MYRTLE TREES. ADD TREES TO PARKWAY AND BEHIND SIDEWALK SIZE QTY WUCOLS - ZONE 4 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA / CRAPE MYRTLE EXISTING 7 LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA / CRAPE MYRTLE 24" BOX 49 M X CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS `PINK DAWN` / PINK DAWN CHITALPA 24" BOX L PINUS ELDARICA / AFGHAN PINE 24" BOX L DATE STREET EXISTING PLANTED PARKWAY WITH TURF AND LONDON PLANE TREES. ADD TREES BEHIND SIDEWALK. PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA / LONDON PLANE TREE EXISTING 22 PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA / LONDON PLANE TREE 24" BOX 25 M PINUS ELDARICA / AFGHAN PINE 24" BOX L RHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX L TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE GROUNDCOVER PARKWAY WITH LONDON PLANE STREET TREES AND TREES PLANTED BEHIND SIDEWALK PINUS ELDARICA / AFGHAN PINE 24" BOX 111 L PLATANUS X ACERIFOLIA `BLOODGOOD` / LONDON PLANE TREE 24" BOX M X CHITALPA TASHKENTENSIS `PINK DAWN` / PINK DAWN CHITALPA 24" BOX L INTERIOR DEVELOPMENT TREES ARBUTUS X `MARINA` / ARBUTUS STANDARD 24" BOX 418 M GEIJERA PARVIFLORA / AUSTRALIAN WILLOW 24" BOX M KOELREUTERIA BIPINNATA / CHINESE FLAME TREE MULTI-TRUNK 24" BOX M LAGERSTROEMIA INDICA / CRAPE MYRTLE 24" BOX M OLEA EUROPAEA / EUROPEAN OLIVE 24" BOX L PINUS ELDRICA / AFGHAN PINE 24" BOX L PLATANUS ACERIFOLIA 'BLOODGOOD' / LONDON PLANE TREE 24" BOX M PODOCARPUS GRACILIOR / FERN PINE 24" BOX M PYRUS CALLERYANA 'CHANTICLEER' / CHANTICLEER PEAR 24" BOX M QUERCUS AGRIFOLIA / COAST LIVE OAK 24" BOX L QUERCUS VIRGINIANA / SOUTHERN LIVE OAK 24" BOX M RHUS LANCEA / AFRICAN SUMAC 24" BOX L SCHINUS MOLLE / CALIFORNIA PEPPER TREE 24" BOX L CONCEPT TREE LEGEND BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SIZE WUCOLS - ZONE 4 AGAPANTHUS AFRICANUS / LILY-OF-THE-NILE 1 GAL M AGAVE DESMETTIANA ‘VARIEGATA’ / VARIEGATED DWARF CENTURY PLANT 5 GAL L ANIGOZANTHOS HYBRIDS ‘BUSH GOLD’ / DWARF KANGAROO PAW (YELLOW)5 GAL L ARBUTUS UNEDO ‘ELFIN KING' / ELFIN KING STRAWBERRY KING 5 GAL L BUXUS MICROPHYLLA JAPONICA / JAPANESE BOXWOOD 1 GAL M CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS ‘LITTLE JOHN’ / DWARF BOTTLEBRUSH 5 GAL L CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS ‘SLIM’ / SLIM BOTTLEBRUSH 15 GAL M CAREX PRAEGRACILIS / CALIFORNIA FIELD SEDGE 1 GAL M CAREX TUMULICOLA / FOOTHILL SEDGE 1 GAL L DIANELLA REVOLUTA ‘DR5000' / LITTLE REV FLAX LILY 1 GAL L DIANELLA TAMANICA ‘SILVER STREAK’ / SILVER STREAK FLAX LILY 1 GAL M DIETES BICOLOR / FORTNIGHT LILY 5 GAL M ELAEAGNUS PUNGENS / SILVERBERRY 5 GAL L FEIJOA SELLOWIANA / PINEAPPLE GUAVA 5 GAL M FESTUCA GLAUCA / BLUE FESCUE 1 GAL M HEMEROCALLIS ‘DWARF RED’ / DAYLILLY 1 GAL M ILEX CRENATA ‘SKY PENCIL' / SKY PENCIL ILEX 5 GAL M JUNCUS PATENS / CALIFORNIA GREY RUSH 5 GAL L LANTANA HYBRIDS ‘NEW GOLD’ / NEW GOLD LANTANA 1 GAL L LIGUSTRUM JAPONICA ‘TEXANUM’ / WAX LEAF PRIVET 5 GAL M LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA ‘LM300’ / BREEZE DWARF MAT RUSH 1 GAL M MUHLENBERGIA CAPILARIUS / PINK MUHLY GRASS 1 GAL L MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEER GRASS 1 GAL M PHORMIUM COOKIANUM / GREEN FLAX 5 GAL M PITTOSPORUM TOBIRA / TOBIRA 5 GAL M PODOCARPUS ELONGATUS ‘MONMAL’ / ICEE BLUE YELLOW-WOOD 15 GAL M PRUNUS CAROLINIANA ‘COMPACTA’ / COMPACT LAUREL CHERRY 5 GAL M PUNICA GRANATUM ‘NANA’ / DWARF POMEGRANATE 5 GAL L RHAPHIOLEPIS INDICA ‘CLARA’ / DWARF INDIAN HAWTHORNE 5 GAL M RHAPHIOLEPIS X. ‘MONTIC’ / MAJESTIC BEAUTY INDIAN HAWTHORN 5 GAL M ROSA ‘FLOWER CARPET VAR. NOATRAUM’ / PINK CARPET ROSE 2 GAL M ROSA F. ‘ICE BERG’ / WHITE SHRUB ROSE 5 GAL M ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ‘HUNTINGTON CARPET' / HUNTINGTON ROSEMARY CARPET 1 GAL L ROSMARINUS OFFICINALIS ‘TUSCAN BLUE’ / TUSCAN BLUE ROSEMARY 5 GAL L TRACHELOSPERMUM ASIATICUM / ASIAN JASMINE 1 GAL M PARTHENOCISSUS TRICUSPIDATA / BOSTON IVY 1 GAL M WISTERIA SINENSIS / CHINESE WISTERIA 5 GAL M TURF LAWN / MARATHON II H CONCEPT SHRUB LEGEND SYMBOL DESCRIPTION MAIN ENTRY SECONDARY ENTRY RECREATIONAL AREA KIDS PLAY AREA `A` - WITH RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE KIDS PLAY AREA `A` - ZIPLINE KIDS PLAY AREA `B` - WITH WOOD CHIPS PING PONG TABLES BBQ AREA DOG RUN BUTTERFLY GARDEN RESIDENTIAL PASSIVE AREAS TYPICAL COURTYARD LAYOUT TURF BIOSWALE MAILBOX KIOSK AREA `A` MAILBOX KIOSK AREA `B` MAILBOX KIOSK AREA `C` EXISTING PARKWAYS ON YNEZ ROAD - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE EXISTING PARKWAYS ON DATE STREET - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE 18" STEP OUTS - TYPICAL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 LEGEND Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L2 DESIGN STATEMENT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN THE HEIRLOOM FARMS LANDSCAPE DESIGN HAS A COMBINATION OF ORNAMENTAL AND NATIVE PLANTINGS TO ACHIEVE A CHARACTER OF CALIFORNIA AND MEDITERRANEAN STYLE. THE LANDSCAPE DESIGN CONSISTS OF CALIFORNIA-FRIENDLY LOW AND MEDIUM WATER USE PLANT MATERIALS (BASED ON WUCOLS). THE HEIRLOOM FARMS PROJECT ALSO FEATURES SHARED AMENITY SPACES AND PROVIDE RESIDENTS OPPORTUNITIES TO RECREATIONAL USAGES BOTH FOR FAMILY UNIT OR GROUP GATHERINGS. THESE OPEN SPACES INCLUDE RECREATIONAL LOUNGES WITH POOL AND SPA, A TOT-LOT PLAY AREA, A DOG PARK, SHADE STRUCTURES, OPEN TURF PLAY, AND A BUTTERFLY GARDEN. ENHANCED PAVING IS ALSO TO BE USED AT SPECIAL FEATURED AREAS. WHILE THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL AND DESIGN COMPLIMENT THE ARCHITECTURAL TYPE, IT ALSO ADHERES TO THE CITY'S WATER ORDINANCE. TREES AND SHRUBS WILL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 5' AWAY FROM WATER METER, GAS METER, OR SEWER LATERALS; A MINIMUM OF 10' AWAY FROM UTILITY POLES AND A MINIMUM OF 8' AWAY FROM FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE PROVIDED WITHIN 5' OF ANY HARDSCAPE ELEMENT. 3" OF MEDIUM GRADE BARK MULCH REQUIRED UNDER ALL PLANT MATERIAL. IN AREAS WITH GROUNDCOVER PLANTED FROM FLATS, THE MULCH DEPTH WILL BE NO LESS THAN 1-1/2". THE IRRIGATION DESIGN WILL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT CITY OF TEMECULA LANDSCAPE ORDINANCES & STANDARDS. IRRIGATION STATEMENT THE IRRIGATION OF THE SITE LANDSCAPE AREA WILL UTILIZE THE LATEST IN SMART IRRIGATION METHODS AND MEANS. ALL NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL INCLUDE HIGH EFFICIENCY METHODS WITH LOW PRECIPITATION RATES IN ORDER TO MAXIMIZE WATER RETENTION AND DISPERSION TO THE PLANT ROOT ZONES. ALL PLANTERS WILL USE DRIP IRRIGATION. A SMART IRRIGATION CONTROLLER CAPABLE OF RAIN SHUTOFF WILL ALSO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE DESIGN. MEDIUM GRADE BARK MULCH WILL BE USED IN ORDER TO REDUCE WATER LOSS DUE TO EVAPORATION. AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE WILL BE PROVIDED IN ORDER TO PROGRAM THE CONTROLLER. TWO IRRIGATION SCHEDULES WILL BE PROVIDED, ONE FOR THE PLANT ESTABLISHMENT PERIOD AND ONE FOR ON-GOING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ONCE THE PLANTS ARE ESTABLISHED. ALL NEW IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WILL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT CITY OF TEMECULA WATER ORDINANCE. 0 feet100 SCALE: 1" = 50' 50 150 200 CITY NOTES MULCH NOTE: 3” OF MEDIUM GRADE BARK MULCH REQUIRED UNDER ALL PLANT MATERIAL. IN AREAS WITH GROUNDCOVER PLANTED FROM FLATS, THE MULCH DEPTH SHALL BE NO LESS THAN ONE AND ONE-HALF INCHES. FIELD OBSERVATION NOTE: CITY OF TEMECULA REQUIRED FIELD OBSERVATION: A MINIMUM OF THREE INSPECTIONS WILL BE REQUIRED PER CONSTRUCTION PHASING. THE FIRST IS AN IRRIGATION INSPECTION TO VERIFY PIPE DEPTHS AND IRRIGATION MATERIAL CONFORMANCE. THE SECOND IS A LANDSCAPE INSPECTION TO VERIFY IRRIGATION COVERAGE AND OPERATION, AND TO VERIFY THAT ALL PLANTINGS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THE THIRD IS A FINAL INSPECTION ONCE MULCH HAS BEEN LAID AND ALL PLANT MATERIAL AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS ARE IN PLACE. CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO SCHEDULE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE INSPECTIONS. TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico L30 feet40 SCALE: 1" = 20' 20 60 80 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 1 MAIN ENTRY RECREATION CENTER COMMUNITY PLAY AREAS & BUTTERFLY GARDEN 1 LEGEND TURF AREA 2 BUTTERFLY GARDEN 11 3 KIDS PLAY AREA ‘B’ - WITH WOOD CHIPS 4 BIOSWALE 12 RECREATION AREA - BBQ AREA 5 BBQ AREA WITH COMMUNITY TABLE AND STAINLESS STEEL OUTDOOR BBQ - TURBO 3 BUILT-IN GAS GRILL BY BBQGALORE 6 DYMONDIA PATHWAY 13 RECREATION AREA - SPA 14 RECREATION AREA - POOL POOL: 1,932 SF POOL AREA: 11,046 SF 15 RECREATION AREA - CABANA 16 MAILBOX KIOSK: POST MOUNTED CBU AVAILABLE THROUGH FLORENCEMAILBOXES.COM 17 CUSTOM BUILT SHADE STRUCTURE 18 ENHANCED PAVING DECOMPOSED GRANITE EXISTING PARKWAYS ON YNEZ ROAD - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE 19 6” WIDE CURBS 7 PING PONG TABLE IN DECOMPOSED GRANITE 8 9 ENHANCED VEHICULAR PAVING ORCO HOLLAND STONE - TUSCANY 10 24” HIGH LOW WALL 2 6 3 19 9 19 8 8 1315 14 517 16 7 4 12 1 1 1110 9 818 19 19 TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico L4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT 0 feet40 SCALE: 1" = 20' 20 60 80 4 4 1 2 TYPICAL COURTYARD TYPICAL COURTYARD DOG RUN COMMUNITY PLAY AREAS MAILBOX KIOSKS LEGEND TURF AREA 24” HIGH LOW ACCENT WALL BIOSWALE KIDS PLAY AREA ‘A’ - WITH RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE ISD PLAY AREA ‘A’ - ZIPLINE NEIGHBORHOOD SEATING AREA 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 DOG RUN 9 RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY 10 WOOD CHIPS 1 ENHANCED PAVING ORCO HOLLAND STONE - TUSCANY DECOMPOSED GRANITE CALIFORNIA GOLD EXISTING PARKWAYS ON YNEZ ROAD - TREES & LANDSCAPE TO REMAIN IN PLACE 12 13 14 15 6” WIDE CURBS16 PARKING FINGERS PARKING FINGERS AS WELL AS PLANTING AREAS AT THE END OF STALLS MUCH HAVE A 5’ MINIMUM PLANTER WIDTH. 17 11 11 3 16 10 3 8 15 9 16 16 13 16 17 14 16 17 3 7 12 6 5 BBQ AREA WITH COMMUNITY TABLE AND STAINLESS STEEL OUTDOOR BBQ - TURBO 3 BUILT-IN GAS GRILL BY BBQGALORE MAILBOX KIOSK AREA ‘B’: POST MOUNTED CBU AVAILABLE THROUGH FLORENCEMAILBOXES.COM MAILBOX KIOSK AREA ‘C’: POST MOUNTED CBU AVAILABLE THROUGH FLORENCEMAILBOXES.COM TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico PRELIMINARY STREET SECTIONS L50 feet5 SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0” 2 8 11 DATE STREET CROSS SECTION SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0”YNEZ ROAD CROSS SECTION SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0” TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE CROSS SECTION SCALE: 3/8” = 1’-0” PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CAP CMU PRIVACY BLACK/GREEN WALL PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CAP CMU PRIVACY BLACK/GREEN WALL PRECAST CONCRETE WALL CAP CMU PRIVACY BLACK/GREEN WALL 12/15/20 L-1 GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.SYMBOL NOTES QTY PUBLIC OPEN SPACE 318,521 SF GROUND FLOOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 115,138 SF OPEN SPACE LEGEND Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L6 OPEN SPACE PLAN 0 feet100 SCALE: 1" = 50' 50 150 200 GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.LEGEND OUTER LOOP TRAIL (3,172 L.F. / 0.60 MILES) 5FT WIDE INNER LOOP TRAIL (2,862 L.F. / 0.54 MILES) 5FT WIDE CONNECTIVITY PATH 4FT TO 5FT WIDE Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L7 CONNECTIVITY PLAN 0 feet100 SCALE: 1" = 50' 50 150 200 GREAT RM. STORAGE BREEZE WAY MEN'S WOMEN'S POOLEQUIPMENT PATIO EXT.EXT.EXT.SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 6`-0" MAX. HIGH PERIMETER WALL 5`-6" HIGH VINYL FENCE 6`-0" TUBULAR STEEL POOL FENCE 42" PATIO WALL 6`-0" DECORATIVE WALL AT POOL 4`-0" TUBULAR STEEL DOG PARK FENCE MONUMENT WALL MONUMENT PILASTER 3` TUBULAR STEEL GATE 5`-6" TUBULAR STEEL GATE VINYL GATE W-01 W-03 W-04 W-05 W-06 W-07 W-08 W-09 W-10 W-11 W-12 WALL / FENCE LEGEND Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L8 WALL FENCE PLAN 0 feet100 SCALE: 1" = 50' 50 150 200 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L9 KID PLAY AREAS 0 feet8 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 12 16 KIDS PLAY AREA 'A' - ZIPLINE KIDS PLAY AREA 'A' - WITH RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE KIDS PLAY AREA 'B' - WITH WOOD CHIPS MANUFACTURER: LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES SYSTEM TYPE: PLAYBOOSTER DRAWING #: 1130209-01-02 COLOR: PALETTE AI CONTACT: GREGG ROGERS COAST RECREATION (714) 619 - 0100 MANUFACTURER: LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES SYSTEM TYPE: PLAYBOOSTER DRAWING #:1130209-01-01 COLOR: PALETTE AI CONTACT: GREGG ROGERS COAST RECREATION (714) 619 - 0100 RUBBERIZED SURFACING MANUFACTURER: SURFACE AMERICA COLOR A: BEIGE COLOR B: EGGSHELL COLOR C: BROWN NOTE: COLOR 33% EACH CONTACT: (800) 999 - 0555 WOOD PLAY MULCH MANUFACTURER: FOREST WOOD FIBER-FAMILY TREE PRODUCTS TYPE: FIBER PLAY PRODUCT CONTACT: DYLAN (951) 471 - 4040 ZIP LINER MANUFACTURER: RICHTER SPIELGERATE GMBH MODEL #: 6.01100, LARGE GATED CABLEWAY UP TO 30M WEBSITE/CONTACT: HTTPS://WWW.RICHTER-SPIELGERAETE.DE +/- 111'-0" ZIP LINE RUBBERIZED PLAY SURFACE WOOD PLAY MULCH Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 P: 714-545-2898 F: 714-545-2878 bgb-inc.com SUBMITTAL #4 L10 MAILBOX STRUCTURES MAILBOX AREAS 'B' & 'C' - WOOD ARBOR STRUCTURE SIDE ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION MAILBOX AREA 'A' - WOOD OVERHEAD STRUCTURE SIDE ELEVATIONFRONT ELEVATION 0 feet4 SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" 2 6 8 PEDESTAL MOUNT MAIL CLUSTER BOX UNIT MAILBOX INFORMATION: MANUFACTURER: FLORENCE MAILBOXES MODEL #: VITAL 1570-16V2 COLOR: DARK BRONZE L11 SITE FURNISHINGS TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 1 ANOVA CANYON THERMORY GABION-STYLE 6’ BENCH Manufacturer: Anova Site Furnishings Model #: CAN1872T Dimension: 18”H x 24“W x 71”L - Recycled plastic lumber seat with heavy-gauge aluminum case frame and stainless steel mesh panels - Fade resistant, powder coated cage frame and mesh panels feature a state-of-the-art primer to prevent rusting - Planks will not split or rot and the fade-resistant color is uniform throught the planks. - Maintenance-free recycled plastic never needs painting or staining 2 ANOVA MIXX 5’ RECYLCED PLASTIC FLAT BENCH Manufacturer: Anova Site Furnishings Model #: MIX2960R Dimension: 18”H x 15“W x 60”L - Fade resistant, powder coated steel frame and legs feature a state-of-the-art primer to prevent rusting - Fade-resistant color is uniform throughout the planks - Maintenance-free recycled plastic never needs painting or staining - Stainless steel foot glides adjust for leveling and to protect your floor 3 ANOVA MADISON BENCH Manufacturer: Anova Site Furnishings Model #: RCPMC6 Dimension: 35-1/8”H x 27-1/2“W x 79-1/4”L - Recycled plastic planks impervious to moisture and corrosion - 1/2” thick formed steel with manufacturers’ corrosion resistive painted finish - Finish: Powder coated 4 ANOVA MIXX 34” x 72” RECYLCED PLASTIC TABLE Manufacturer: Anova Site Furnishings Model #: MIX2945R Dimension: 31”H x 34“W x 72”L - Fade resistant, powder coated steel frame and legs feature a state-of-the-art primer to prevent rusting - Fade-resistant color is uniform throughout the planks - Maintenance-free recycled plastic never needs painting or staining - Stainless steel foot glides adjust for leveling and to protect your floor 5 ANOVA BISTRO TABLE 33 FEATURES All seating, table tops and receptacle bases are protected by the Fusion Advantage finish (see page 7 for details). Bench ends, legs and armrests, chair pedestal, table frames and receptacle tops are protected with a powder coated finish to resist rusting. Benches and tables are portable/surface mount style. Bistro tables, ADA tables and pedestal chairs are surface mount only. Available in colors shown on page 92. Bistro Tables 12-gauge steel seating and 36" diameter table top with steel frame. 2-Seat Table with Contour Swivel Seats L1401S 36"H x 36"W x 84"L 204 lbs. 2-Seat Table with Contour Seats L1401 35"H x 36"W x 83"L 197 lbs. 2-Seat Table with Flat Seats L1400 30"H x 36"W x 75"L 177 lbs. Lucaya Umbrellas Sunbrella marine-grade, acrylic fabric with aluminum pole shown on opposite page. Standard and premium fabric colors shown on page 93. Pole colors shown at anovafurnishings.com/ patterns. 9' Diameter – Standard Color Fabric 9LPU-CSC 87"H × 9'Dia. 26 lbs. 9' Diameter - Premium Color Fabric 9LPU-CPC 87"H × 9'Dia. 26 lbs. U-Brace Table Brace UBRACE 1⁄2"H × 11⁄2"I.D. 1 lb. Bistro Table L1401S — shown in black Bistro Table L1400 Bistro Table L1401 Table L1444 Table L1449S ADA Table L1451S Tables 12-gauge steel seating and 46" diameter table top with steel frame. (Tables with contour seats also available in fixed seat style at anovafurnishings.com/latitude.) 4-Seat Table with Contour Swivel Seats L1449S 35"H × 93"Dia. 327 lbs. 5-Seat Table with Contour Swivel Seats L1447S 35"H × 94"Dia. 385 lbs. 6-Seat Table with Contour Swivel Seats L1446S 35"H × 93"Dia. 436 lbs. 4-Seat Table with Flat Seats L1448 30"H × 85"Dia. 274 lbs. 5-Seat Table with Flat Seats L1445 30"H × 87"Dia. 319 lbs. 6-Seat Table with Flat Seats L1444 30"H × 85"Dia. 356 lbs. 3-Seat ADA Table with Contour Swivel Seats L1451S 36"H × 70"W × 93"L 289 lbs. 3-Seat ADA Table with Flat Seats L1450 30"H × 66"W × 85"L 249 lbs. 6 ANOVA FRENCH DOOR RECEPTACLE 35 Receptacle L2040 — shown in textured bronze Receptacle L2055 Receptacle L1439 and Receptacle 1438 Receptacle L2055A Receptacle L2040 Receptacles 16- and 40-gallon bases: 12-gauge steel; 55-gallon base: 14-gauge steel; steel tops. 16 Gallon Receptacle with Contour Top and Liner L1438 25"H × 17"Dia. 57 lbs. 40 Gallon Receptacle with Contour Top and Liner L1439 34"H × 24"Dia. 105 lbs. 40 Gallon French Door Receptacle with Built-In L2040 43"H × 25"Dia. 162 lbs. Bonnet Top and Liner 40 Gallon French Door Receptacle with Built-In L2040AT 43"H × 25"Dia. 169 lbs. Bonnet Ash Top and Liner 55 Gallon Receptacle with Bonnet Top and Liner L2055 46"H × 28"Dia. 173 lbs. 55 Gallon Receptacle with Bonnet Ash Top and Liner L2055A 46"H × 28"Dia. 178 lbs. L12 SITE FURNISHINGS TEMECULA, CA HEIRLOOM FARMS 10/29/2019 SUBMITTAL #4PA18-0661APN #: 916-400-034-1, 916-400-035-2, 916-400-036-3, 916-400-039-6, 919-400-060-4 Landscape Architecture 3185 C1 Airway Avenue Costa Mesa, CA 92626 bgb-inc.comO: 714 545 2898 F: 714 545 2878 Planning Urban Design MLC Holdings, Inc.5 Peters Canyon, Suite 310, Irvine, CA 92606 Ph: (949) 378 - 3309 Contact: Aaron Talarico 7 BBQ GRILL IN COMMON AREA Manufacturer: BBQGalore Model #: Turbo 3 Built-In Gas Grill 8 OUTDOOR CONCRETE PING PONG TABLE Manufacturer: Outdoor Creations Inc. Model #: 1500 - Table Tennis Color: Light Grey Texture: Light Sandblast Sealer: Nano Sealer Standard Net - One-piece, precast concrete table that is fully rebar reinforced. 9 DECOMPOSITE GRANITE - CALIFORNIA GOLD Manufacturer: Southwest Boulder & Stone Color: California Gold 10 ENHANCED PAVING (VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN AREAS) Manufacturer: Orco Block & Hardscape Stone: Holland Stone Color: Tuscany Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 TITLE SHEET & SECTIONS HEIRLOOM FARMS C1 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN C2 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN C3 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN C4 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 PRELIMINARY SITEPLAN C5 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400 Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 C6 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 PRELIMINARY WET UTILITY PLAN C7 Huitt-Zollars, Inc. Irvine Phone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-5820 2603 Main Street, Suite 400 Irvine, California 92614 TEMECULA, CA PA18-0661 C8 TRASH EXHIBIT EXTERIOR SITE ELECTRICAL NOTESLIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND 1. EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING CONDUCTORS TO BE 2 #12 THHN/THWN-2 CU IN 3/4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MINIMUM ELECTRICAL DEVICE LEGEND JUNCTION BOX WR RATED - GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLE W/ WEATHERPROOF COVERWP J ELECTRICAL PANEL GATE MOTOR SINGLE POLE SWITCH ELECTRICAL KEY NOTES REMOTE SOLAR READY AREA. PROVIDE 2" C.O. AND PULL ROPE LED WALL LIGHT CONTROLLED BY (1250 LUMENS AT 3000° K) J UNDERGROUND PULL BOX 2. UNDERGROUND PULL BOXES ARE TO BE SIZE 3-1/2. ADDITIONAL PULL BOXES MAY BE NEEDED THAN CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO HELP IN PULLING THE CONDUCTORS DURING INSTALLATION. THE COVER OF THE PULL BOXES ARE TO BE MARKED WITH "ELECTRIC". 3. SPLICES AND TAPS SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES OR POLE BASE HAND HOLES ONLY. 4. REFER TO THE DRY UTILITY CONSULTANT PLANS OR SERVING UTILITY PLANS TO CONFIRM THE SERVICE LOCATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UNDERGROUND WORK. 5. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 3/16" MIN. PULL ROPE IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS OR SLEEVES. 6. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS LOCAL CODES OR THE SOILS REPORT REQUIRE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONDUIT. 7. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST NEVER HAVE A GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE (WALL LIGHT, POLE LIGHT, BOLLARD, ETC.) WIRED AFTER AN ACCENT LIGHT SUCH THAT IF THE ACCENT LIGHT WAS REMOVED OR DAMAGED IT WOULD AFFECT THE GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE'S POWER. 8. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST FLIP THE CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OFF BEFORE ANY MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL FIXTURE, LAMP, DEVICE OR CONTROLLER. 1 TRANSFORMER (240V DIRECT BURIAL): FOCUS INDUSTRIES OR EQUALT M COVER PER NEC 300.5(A) (SEE BELOW) LANDSCAPING 18" MIN NONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT) LOW VOLTAGE (>30V)LANDSCAPE LIGHTINGDIRECT BURIAL CABLE 6" MIN STREETS, HIGHWAYS,ROADS ALLEYS,DRIVEWAYS, ANDPARKING LOTS 24" MIN NONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT),RIGID METAL CONDUITAND DIRECT BURIAL CABLES RIGID METAL CONDUITOR INTERMEDIATE METAL CONDUIT MINIMUM COVER REQUIREMENTS 2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GND IN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT INDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION CONTROLER VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH IRRIGATION PLANS 2 INSTALL 1" CONDUIT AND POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE 3 TO PANEL "EV" FOR FUTURE USE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER FUTURE EV CHARGER LOCATION H..-X210 TO FUTURE LAUNDRY BUILDING INVERTER LOCATION. USA# DSTPB1-VLED-IV-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-164-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV) 16FT POLE 3000° K LAMP USA# DSTPB1-VLED-III-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-164-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE III) 16FT POLE 3000° K LAMP A3 A4 C2 16W LED BOLLARD - TYPE II - 36" TALL COOPER# 303-B1-LEDB2-3000K-UNV-T2--** ** FINISH BY OWNER ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK - TYPICAL LOCATION CONNECT TO UNIT PHOTOCELL CIRCUIT.4 VERIFY LOCATION. HSS HOUSE SIDE SHIELD PER PLAN 2 #6 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #6 CU-GND IN 1-1/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT H..-X26 H..-X D USA# DSTPB1-VLED-II-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE II) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP B2 USA# DSTPB1-VLED-III-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE III) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP B4 9W LED BULLET ACCENT TRELLIS LIGHT HADCO# BL9-D-W-**-SMALL PANCAKE JBOX 3000° K ** FINISH BY OWNER 3000° K 1 B3 USA# DSTPB1-VLED-IV-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP LED WALL LIGHT - SAME AS ABOVE WILL HAVE THIS LIGHT LOCATION. AT NON-TYPICAL LOCATION. NOT ALL UNITS NOT ALL POLE LIGHTS HAVE A SHIELD REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION.1.60.90.91.40.70.81.11.41.00.70.50.71.42.02.31.10.80.60.41.01.90.80.70.60.41.00.90.80.40.30.50.90.50.40.40.50.30.50.91.11.51.01.01.41.31.11.21.01.01.71.42.32.01.51.71.01.01.31.51.41.01.11.71.11.71.00.90.91.41.71.11.01.21.42.22.21.61.81.41.01.41.51.31.11.11.71.50.81.01.11.11.01.10.51.21.31.11.01.12.12.01.51.81.21.11.11.31.21.21.01.71.41.01.61.41.01.61.71.20.91.01.42.31.71.81.71.61.01.21.41.21.11.01.11.41.40.41.00.91.70.91.40.90.91.11.01.30.90.81.51.21.11.01.21.11.11.11.60.90.80.80.91.11.10.71.31.31.00.91.00.91.20.90.91.41.01.11.01.51.11.20.80.91.51.51.11.01.01.51.30.80.90.91.21.50.80.81.11.11.51.01.01.50.91.10.91.00.91.61.10.70.71.41.01.21.10.91.01.51.01.71.00.80.81.00.81.21.40.91.20.91.21.11.20.91.00.91.01.31.01.01.31.21.20.70.71.01.50.80.51.01.31.61.01.20.80.91.41.01.00.90.81.31.40.90.91.31.70.91.00.90.91.21.20.91.01.30.70.91.11.01.01.11.10.91.41.50.80.81.70.60.90.90.81.20.71.10.80.91.50.90.91.50.60.81.50.91.21.11.12.01.41.31.81.71.11.22.21.71.51.61.61.01.21.80.91.00.80.81.31.40.70.40.30.70.71.71.11.01.41.21.11.51.91.21.32.01.22.21.61.21.21.31.11.61.20.90.80.80.91.70.50.31.10.91.71.31.11.11.11.21.70.51.91.41.92.11.32.01.71.41.41.41.21.30.81.51.10.40.80.91.21.60.60.30.50.91.20.91.61.01.11.32.41.21.51.51.61.21.20.91.30.60.70.30.50.71.61.10.91.21.41.41.91.81.21.21.00.91.51.50.81.00.50.90.81.30.90.91.21.71.11.61.81.11.31.01.01.11.70.70.70.61.012.40.716.33.80.50.40.40.40.40.31.19.40.90.40.40.40.40.31.414.61.00.70.410.16.50.33.215.30.70.516.30.814.53.10.70.915.12.20.73.116.50.60.71.111.42.70.50.66.54.10.50.71.711.60.80.70.60.30.80.90.81.11.00.90.51.30.30.51.30.30.61.20.30.61.10.30.51.00.40.50.50.50.51.18.60.60.70.812.32.01.05.08.94.012.50.90.30.61.41.00.60.50.60.91.71.10.52.16.92.42.01.10.71.12.91.91.40.81.32.23.75.02.01.00.91.00.70.40.30.41.01.72.11.31.10.811.31.34.46.82.611.90.60.70.713.52.30.60.51.214.21.20.50.50.61.216.01.40.61.016.31.60.70.41.38.92.50.51.22.22.53.42.62.62.41.91.51.82.16.64.32.31.10.50.71.11.21.62.42.55.13.71.71.71.00.80.91.41.41.72.34.62.51.71.11.11.01.92.52.32.22.61.90.91.21.92.31.91.92.41.91.71.62.52.12.12.31.91.81.82.22.02.02.12.22.20.50.70.90.80.81.72.92.52.21.51.01.21.32.02.51.81.70.80.50.70.70.91.41.62.02.65.72.21.51.11.00.60.50.61.10.91.01.82.02.42.12.82.41.10.80.40.40.60.91.51.82.71.91.71.20.70.61.42.32.23.72.32.11.00.81.62.41.11.11.62.11.52.02.26.02.11.81.41.72.22.37.68.25.42.11.61.31.71.61.93.83.52.21.61.11.06.01.61.11.61.81.31.62.12.62.62.64.32.63.21.42.62.32.42.54.32.22.01.61.92.62.41.71.91.41.10.90.90.81.21.21.31.50.92.61.20.92.01.41.31.01.11.51.61.04.51.41.52.51.71.21.61.61.71.51.31.91.71.81.61.71.61.61.41.61.51.31.41.61.51.62.61.51.61.30.80.51.62.11.91.11.02.32.12.11.00.70.70.61.01.10.52.12.01.00.81.42.82.21.91.2A4C2 C2C2 C2 C2 C2C2C2 B4 C2C2B2B2B2B2B4B4 B4B2 B2B 2 B2B4C2C2C2B4B4C2C2C2C2C2C2 C2C2 C2 C2C2 C2C2DDDDDDDDDDDDA3A3A4A4 A4 D D D DHSSDD DD DD B2 DD B4B4B2B2B2 HSS HSS HSSHSSHSSHSSHSSHSSJOB #: X8-027LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 27201 Calle Juanita Dana Point, CA 92624 Ph. 949.201.1333 candelaengineering.com DATE:10/31/19JOB #: X8-027LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 27201 Calle Juanita Dana Point, CA 92624 Ph. 949.201.1333 candelaengineering.com DATE:10/31/19SCALE: 1" = 40'-0"MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 2PA18-0661, Submittal No. 4 EXT.EXT.EXT.0.90.81.21.11.11.11.50.71.81.01.22.30.91.81.51.41.71.42.11.62.22.82.52.23.51.91.42.30.90.71.31.01.31.11.60.81.71.11.31.92.11.61.30.71.81.21.41.41.31.11.41.50.90.81.31.11.11.11.50.91.41.11.22.11.91.51.21.21.71.21.51.11.41.21.31.60.80.30.70.80.80.50.40.80.90.30.30.51.32.10.30.30.50.91.00.80.40.30.40.61.01.21.21.30.50.31.41.11.10.70.80.41.91.21.30.90.72.02.41.21.01.91.81.61.21.21.62.11.32.01.71.21.81.72.52.72.21.62.31.62.20.41.60.70.61.01.01.21.11.20.91.61.51.11.21.82.11.11.31.81.31.11.61.81.11.11.41.21.31.71.30.50.31.01.11.01.01.11.01.81.41.01.31.61.71.21.91.51.41.21.61.51.01.41.31.21.51.80.41.40.80.60.80.81.21.01.51.01.62.51.21.31.51.61.31.42.11.31.11.41.31.11.11.31.21.41.50.40.31.60.81.10.90.81.21.01.41.01.61.91.11.11.72.11.21.21.81.41.01.51.91.01.01.61.31.31.60.61.40.50.71.11.10.90.70.70.61.01.30.80.60.70.81.30.91.00.80.70.61.00.90.80.70.60.61.11.00.70.70.60.71.10.50.90.80.50.30.50.30.30.60.70.41.01.60.61.42.30.61.11.82.42.50.71.82.32.21.31.02.22.21.21.22.10.90.91.70.70.71.21.91.21.10.90.71.21.11.71.02.10.71.11.21.00.90.81.40.81.22.11.50.90.90.80.71.11.01.60.80.61.21.20.91.11.10.80.80.60.91.60.90.61.22.20.51.42.00.81.31.22.20.61.41.90.40.71.51.60.91.31.11.21.10.81.10.80.81.00.91.41.10.91.41.30.81.21.00.90.71.00.90.81.10.91.50.90.91.51.11.01.01.11.21.41.10.81.51.21.00.91.21.01.01.31.60.90.80.81.01.11.40.81.41.41.00.90.90.91.51.21.00.91.01.01.21.01.60.80.80.71.01.21.51.01.61.50.80.90.80.91.00.90.81.60.91.20.90.81.00.81.21.71.61.01.01.21.41.11.20.81.60.90.91.01.21.21.21.01.51.50.80.90.91.01.00.90.81.51.21.10.91.00.91.31.61.41.31.11.40.91.11.20.41.60.80.80.91.01.21.20.91.41.50.81.00.91.00.90.90.81.70.91.21.00.91.11.01.21.52.32.02.22.11.01.31.71.70.91.01.51.71.41.51.31.61.41.51.91.41.01.31.31.91.00.81.31.20.70.40.30.51.31.01.61.11.21.91.71.31.51.31.71.31.71.91.81.11.21.61.71.10.81.51.10.70.40.40.71.41.01.91.11.22.11.21.81.41.41.11.51.21.52.21.71.61.01.21.11.51.21.01.60.91.30.80.40.40.51.20.91.71.01.22.01.01.81.41.41.11.81.21.42.01.81.51.01.21.31.41.20.91.40.81.10.80.50.50.30.60.81.41.10.91.41.51.11.11.21.22.41.51.31.21.21.31.61.81.31.51.10.91.31.40.80.90.40.80.81.31.00.91.51.51.01.11.31.32.32.21.41.21.41.31.41.51.91.21.31.00.91.31.20.62.50.50.90.91.21.00.91.61.51.01.11.31.32.31.41.21.51.41.41.51.61.91.21.21.00.91.41.20.60.70.40.70.81.31.10.91.51.61.01.11.31.32.42.21.51.21.41.31.41.51.51.81.31.31.10.91.31.30.80.80.50.90.91.21.00.91.61.61.01.11.31.31.91.41.21.31.41.51.91.21.21.00.91.31.20.60.70.40.51.40.30.31.40.50.41.40.40.70.90.51.40.30.80.41.10.90.40.81.30.30.40.80.20.91.20.30.40.80.20.81.20.30.40.80.20.81.20.30.50.90.20.70.613.31.210.54.30.70.50.40.30.60.60.40.30.50.60.31.616.60.68.49.30.53.50.512.61.50.40.40.65.83.90.60.73.211.80.812.11.65.42.112.70.70.50.40.40.40.40.36.12.00.30.30.50.80.412.41.60.40.611.33.50.40.50.40.40.50.84.00.30.40.50.70.50.50.50.73.415.72.215.00.67.23.40.72.10.71.10.70.70.81.20.70.60.81.23.813.16.78.50.91.10.60.60.81.00.70.60.71.14.015.42.511.20.81.20.60.70.81.00.60.60.81.210.410.15.49.01.61.01.81.30.90.60.71.11.82.41.91.31.21.31.60.80.71.32.12.02.72.72.41.20.50.50.90.40.41.52.01.61.11.10.80.40.71.92.92.22.02.11.70.70.71.92.42.21.82.02.21.40.54.42.52.32.11.20.91.31.72.02.42.71.90.80.91.61.95.63.42.41.81.00.81.42.52.41.81.11.72.36.82.22.02.42.11.21.42.22.11.82.12.62.31.20.91.40.60.51.01.61.92.21.31.53.91.11.01.21.41.61.11.11.41.21.31.51.31.11.31.51.32.21.61.01.415.90.60.40.71.11.90.50.50.93.42.14.92.72.12.42.01.012.91.915.50.50.80.56.88.81.91.71.00.80.70.81.31.11.51.12.22.35.82.72.70.60.80.80.80.80.80.70.8C2C2C2C2C2C2C2C2 C2C2C2A2A2A4A4B2 B2 B2 B2C2C 2 C2 C2C2C2C2C2C2C2C2C2B2 B2B4DDDDDDDDDDDD A 3A3 C2 C2C2C2D D D D D D HSSB2C2HSSB2B2 B4HSSHSSHSSHSSHSSHSS1111B3HSSB31111EXTERIOR SITE ELECTRICAL NOTESLIGHTING FIXTURE LEGEND 1. EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING CONDUCTORS TO BE 2 #12 THHN/THWN-2 CU IN 3/4" SCHEDULE 40 PVC CONDUIT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MINIMUM ELECTRICAL DEVICE LEGEND JUNCTION BOX WR RATED - GFCI PROTECTED RECEPTACLE W/ WEATHERPROOF COVERWP J ELECTRICAL PANEL GATE MOTOR SINGLE POLE SWITCH ELECTRICAL KEY NOTES REMOTE SOLAR READY AREA. PROVIDE 2" C.O. AND PULL ROPE LED WALL LIGHT CONTROLLED BY (1250 LUMENS AT 3000° K) J UNDERGROUND PULL BOX 2. UNDERGROUND PULL BOXES ARE TO BE SIZE 3-1/2. ADDITIONAL PULL BOXES MAY BE NEEDED THAN CURRENTLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS TO HELP IN PULLING THE CONDUCTORS DURING INSTALLATION. THE COVER OF THE PULL BOXES ARE TO BE MARKED WITH "ELECTRIC". 3. SPLICES AND TAPS SHALL BE MADE IN PULL BOXES OR POLE BASE HAND HOLES ONLY. 4. REFER TO THE DRY UTILITY CONSULTANT PLANS OR SERVING UTILITY PLANS TO CONFIRM THE SERVICE LOCATION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UNDERGROUND WORK. 5. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL A 3/16" MIN. PULL ROPE IN ALL EMPTY CONDUITS OR SLEEVES. 6. UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40, UNLESS LOCAL CODES OR THE SOILS REPORT REQUIRE A DIFFERENT TYPE OF CONDUIT. 7. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST NEVER HAVE A GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE (WALL LIGHT, POLE LIGHT, BOLLARD, ETC.) WIRED AFTER AN ACCENT LIGHT SUCH THAT IF THE ACCENT LIGHT WAS REMOVED OR DAMAGED IT WOULD AFFECT THE GENERAL LIGHTING FIXTURE'S POWER. 8. THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR MUST FLIP THE CIRCUIT BREAKER TO OFF BEFORE ANY MAINTENANCE OR REPLACEMENT OF AN ELECTRICAL FIXTURE, LAMP, DEVICE OR CONTROLLER. 1 TRANSFORMER (240V DIRECT BURIAL): FOCUS INDUSTRIES OR EQUALT M COVER PER NEC 300.5(A) (SEE BELOW) LANDSCAPING 18" MIN NONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT) LOW VOLTAGE (>30V)LANDSCAPE LIGHTINGDIRECT BURIAL CABLE 6" MIN STREETS, HIGHWAYS,ROADS ALLEYS,DRIVEWAYS, ANDPARKING LOTS 24" MIN NONMETALLIC RACEWAY(I.E. PVC CONDUIT),RIGID METAL CONDUITAND DIRECT BURIAL CABLES RIGID METAL CONDUIT OR INTERMEDIATEMETAL CONDUIT MINIMUM COVER REQUIREMENTS 2 #10 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #10 CU-GND IN 3/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT INDICATES CIRCUIT NUMBER (TYPICAL) IRRIGATION CONTROLER VERIFY EXACT LOCATION WITH IRRIGATION PLANS 2 INSTALL 1" CONDUIT AND POLYPROPYLENE PULL ROPE 3 TO PANEL "EV" FOR FUTURE USE IRRIGATION CONTROLLER FUTURE EV CHARGER LOCATION H..-X210 TO FUTURE LAUNDRY BUILDING INVERTER LOCATION. USA# DSTPB1-VLED-IV-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-164-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV) 16FT POLE 3000° K LAMP USA# DSTPB1-VLED-III-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-164-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE III) 16FT POLE 3000° K LAMP A3 A4 C2 16W LED BOLLARD - TYPE II - 36" TALL COOPER# 303-B1-LEDB2-3000K-UNV-T2--** ** FINISH BY OWNER ASTRONOMICAL TIME CLOCK - TYPICAL LOCATION CONNECT TO UNIT PHOTOCELL CIRCUIT.4 VERIFY LOCATION. HSS HOUSE SIDE SHIELD PER PLAN 2 #6 THHN/THWN-2-CU & 1 #6 CU-GND IN 1-1/4" SCH. 40 PVC. CONDUIT H..-X26 H..-X D USA# DSTPB1-VLED-II-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE II) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP B2 USA# DSTPB1-VLED-III-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE III) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP B4 9W LED BULLET ACCENT TRELLIS LIGHT HADCO# BL9-D-W-**-SMALL PANCAKE JBOX 3000° K ** FINISH BY OWNER 3000° K 1 B3 USA# DSTPB1-VLED-IV-48-350mA-WW-240-XWB-1-**-HSS POLE# RNTS-124-** 53W LED POLE LIGHT (TYPE IV) 12FT POLE 3000° K LAMP LED WALL LIGHT - SAME AS ABOVE WILL HAVE THIS LIGHT LOCATION. AT NON-TYPICAL LOCATION. NOT ALL UNITS NOT ALL POLE LIGHTS HAVE A SHIELD REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR EXACT LOCATION.JOB #: X8-027LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 27201 Calle Juanita Dana Point, CA 92624 Ph. 949.201.1333 candelaengineering.com DATE:10/31/19JOB #: X8-027LIGHTING DESIGN | ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING 27201 Calle Juanita Dana Point, CA 92624 Ph. 949.201.1333 candelaengineering.com DATE:10/31/19MATCHLINE SEE SHEET 1SCALE: 1" = 40'-0" PA18-0661, Submittal No. 4 PROJECTLOCATION1UTILITIESVESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37509BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1 THOUGH 6 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 239, PAGES 33THROUGH 39, OF PARCEL MAPS, ALSO PORTIONS OF PARCELS A THROUGH D OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO PA-15-1434, RECORDEDDECEMBER 15, 2015, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2015-0542234 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA2Huitt-Zollars, Inc. IrvinePhone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-58202603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614CITY OF TEMECULAVESTING TENTATIVETRACT MAP NO. 37509HEIRLOOM FARMS PA16-0662PA18-0661PA18-0661DATA TABLE················IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA STREET D (PRIVATE)STREET E (PRIVATE)STREET A (PRIVATE)STREET B (PRIVATE)STREET C (PRIVATE)WAVERLY LANE(EXISTING)LOT BL.L.A. NO. PA07-0249INST. NO. 2007-0695987O.R.LOT AL.L.A. NO. PA07-0249INST. NO.2007-0695987 O.R.TRACT 32436M.B. 393/47-51TRACT 32436-1M.B. 393/42-46TRACT 32437-1M.B. 393/16-22P.M.B. 239/33-39DOC. NO. 2015-0542235, O.R.ΔYNEZ ROAD(EXISTING)DATE STREET(EXISTING)TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE(PROPOSED)TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE(EXISTING)LEGEND22Huitt-Zollars, Inc. IrvinePhone (949) 988-5815 Fax (949) 988-58202603 Main Street, Suite 400Irvine, California 92614CITY OF TEMECULAVESTING TENTATIVETRACT MAP NO. 37509HEIRLOOM FARMS PA16-0662PA18-0661PA18-0661EXISTING EASEMENTSPROPOSED EASEMENTS PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-0661, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A 321 UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY CONSISTING OF DETACHED HOMES AND ATTACHED TOWNHOMES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DATE STREET AND YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 7, 2018, MLC Holdings, Inc. filed two Planning Applications: No. 18- 0661, a Development Plan and No. PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509). These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on January 6, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA18-0661, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.F A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a single family residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a single family residential community at the project site as the project is located in the Residential Overlay. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has b een found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and no further environmental review is required. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 321 unit single family residential community is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA18-0661, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6th day of January, 2021. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of January, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA18 -0661 A Development Plan for a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-400-034 916-400-035 916-400-036 916-400-039 916-400-060 N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) MSHCP Category: Residential (Attached & Detached) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) Single-Family with Attached Garage January 6, 2021 January 6, 2024 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Filing Notice of Determination. The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Division a cashier’s check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Fifty Dollars ($50.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said 48 hour period the applicant/ developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(c)). 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2002-026470 recorded on January 16, 2002 and Amendments. 7. Compliance with EIR. The Harveston Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2001 and first amended in 2003 and again in 2020 to allow for residential development on the project site. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified as part of this effort (EIR SCH No. 2019070974). The project and all subsequent projects within the site have been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 11. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 12. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. The pre-construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the clearance survey, the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be resurveyed. 13. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 14. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. See the attached color/material schemes. 15. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 16. Organics Enclosures. The organics enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate two organics bins. 17. Organics Enclosures. Organics enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 18. Covered Organics Enclosures. All organics enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the organics enclosures, including the solid cover. 19. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 20. Phasing Plan. If phasing is proposed, a phasing plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Community Development Director. 21. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 22. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Section 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 23. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 24. Fireplaces. Per the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program no residential units shall be constructed with fireplaces or hearths. 25. Fiscal Impact Analysis Compliance. The Project is required to address impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated October, 2020 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of Four Hundred and One Dollars ($401.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of nine and four tenths percent (9.4%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Specific Plan area for which a building permit for residential construction has been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Twenty years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. 26. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 27. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 28. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 29. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 30. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 31. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 32. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 33. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 34. Sensitivity Training. Prior to any ground disturbing activities associated with the Project, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct cultural resources sensitivity training for all construction personnel. Construction personnel shall be informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered, and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The Applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain documentation demonstrating attendance. 35. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 14-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 14 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 36. Burrowing Owl Protocol Surveys. Prior to the start of any ground-disturbing activity, each project applicant shall conduct protocol BUOW surveys in accordance with the protocols established by CDFW in the CDEFW 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation to confirm the presence/absence of BUOW within the Project Site and the buffer area identified within the CDFW protocol. If the burrowing owl is present, protective measures, including active or passive relocation, shall be developed in consultation with CDFW to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other applicable CDFW Code requirements and include, but are not limited to the following: • Occupied BUOW shall not be disturbed during nesting season unless a qualified biologist verifies through non-invasive methods that either 1) the birds have not begun egg-laying or incubation or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of an independent survival flight. • A burrowing owl relocation plan shall be prepared that recommends methods needed to relocate the burrowing owls from the project site and provide measures that will be implemented for the maintenance, monitoring, and reporting of the relocated burrowing owls to increase chances of survivorship and better ensure compliance with CDFW guidelines. This plan shall be implemented during the non-breeding season, and prior to seasonal rains to promote the best outcome for conservation of the burrowing owl. In addition to the above, each project applicant can choose to conduct additional BUOW surveys in advance of the prescribed pre-construction survey(s) protocol established by CDFW in order to assess the presence/absence of BUOW on the project site. Surveys conducted earlier than the prescribed pre-construction surveys per CDFW guidelines, would allow each project applicant to start early consultation with CDFW regarding BUOW relocation (assuming BUOW are present within the project site) well in advance of project construction activities. However, early surveys and consultation with CDFW does not eliminate the need to conduct a pre-construction clearance survey in accordance with CDFW guidelines. The pre-construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the clearance survey, the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be resurveyed. All protective measures, including relocation, shall be reviewed and approved by the CDFW prior to the initiating any ground disturbing activities. 37. Native Sediments. If grading activities are proposed within intact native sediments on the Project Site which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater, the qualified archaeologist shall monitor ground disturbing activities. If cultural resources are discovered, the qualified archaeologist shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified archaeologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the archaeologist, in consultation with the Applicant and the City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. 38. Previously Graded Sediments. If grading activities occur within previously graded sediments and inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered, the construction contractor shall suspend grading within 100 feet of the find until the qualified archaeologist evaluates the find and determines the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 39. Qualified Paleontologist. Prior to the start of earth moving activities, each project applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist defined as one meeting SVP standards (Society for Vertebrate Paleontology, 2010) to attend any pre-grade construction meetings to determine when and where excavations extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site Working with each project applicant and the construction crew, the qualified paleontologist shall determine a paleontological monitoring schedule. The qualified paleontologist, or a paleontological monitor working under the direct supervision of the qualified paleontologist, shall monitor all ground-disturbing activity that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site. The location, duration, and timing of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist designated for the Project in consultation with each project applicant and City and shall be based on a review of geologic maps and grading plans. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified paleontologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the paleontologist, in consultation with each project applicant and City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. Monitoring activities shall be documented in a Paleontological Resources Monitoring Report to be prepared by the qualified paleontologist at the completion of construction and shall be provided to the City of Temecula and filed with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County within six (6) months of grading completion for each individual project on the Project Site. 40. Paleontological Sensitivity Training. Prior to start of earth moving activities that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site, the qualified paleontologist shall conduct pre-construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training. This training shall include information on what types of paleontological resources could be encountered during excavations, what to do in case an unanticipated discovery is made by a worker, and laws protecting paleontological resources. All construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils and instructed to immediately inform the construction foreman or supervisor if any bones or other potential fossils are unexpectedly unearthed in an area where a paleontological monitor is not present. 41. Discovery of Paleontological Resources. In the event of unanticipated discovery of paleontological resources when a paleontological monitor is not present, each construction contractor shall cease ground-disturbing activities within 50 feet of the find until it can be assessed by the qualified paleontologist. The qualified paleontologist shall assess the find, implement recovery and reporting measures, if necessary, and determine if paleontological monitoring is warranted once work resumes. 42. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. Within three days of the start of any ground-disturbing activity during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to determine if there are active nests within the onsite trees and vegetation. If an active nest is not found, no biological monitor is required. If active nests are detected, a minimum buffer (e.g., 300 feet for songbirds or 500 feet for raptors) around the nest shall be delineated and flagged, and no construction activity shall occur within the buffer area until a qualified biologist determines the nesting species have fledged and is no longer active or the nest has failed. The buffer may be modified (i.e., increased or decreased) and/or other recommendations proposed (e.g., a temporary soundwall) as determined appropriate by the qualified biologist to minimize impacts. The qualified biologist shall monitor the removal of onsite trees and vegetation. Nest buffer distance will be based on species, specific location of the nest, the intensity of construction activities, existing disturbances unrelated to the project and other factors. 43. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 44. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground-disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards for archeology (U.S. Department of Interior 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula, to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archeological resources 45. Inadvertent Discoveries and Subsurface Cultural Resources. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered either within the intact native sediments or previously graded sediments, grading activities shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find and the Project Applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. • Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. • If preservation in place is not feasible, the Project Applicant and Pechanga Tribe shall discuss reburial of the resources on the Project property, in perpetuity. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. • If the Project Applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director will make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and will take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director will be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City of Temecula City Council. • Any newly discovered cultural resources shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation pursuant to state law prior to restarting grading within 100 feet of the discovered resources. The cultural resources evaluation of the newly discovered cultural resources shall be detailed in a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan (“Plan”). Furthermore, after ground disturbing activities are completed, the archeologist shall prepare a monitoring report (consistent with the County of Riverside Phase IV monitoring report requirements) and submit the monitoring report to the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 46. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 47. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 48. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 49. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 50. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 51. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance) identifying the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 52. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 53. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 54. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 55. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. 56. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: a. Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or longer and the side yards for corner lots. b. Wrought iron fencing around the pool area and dog park. c. Vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing of the single family detached lots and 2-story townhomes. d. Burnished block wall for all patio walls of the 3-story townhomes 57. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 58. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc. to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 59. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped and irrigated for dust and soil erosion control. 60. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 61. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 62. Roof Mounted Mechanical Equipment. Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however, solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Director of Community Development approval. 63. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of the all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 64. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 65. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 66. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 67. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 68. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection. 69. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed. 70. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 71. Community-Wide Public Benefit. The applicant shall provide a cash payment in the amount of $750,000.00 to the City of Temecula prior to the first certificate of occupancy. This payment will fulfill the requirements of the Growth Management Plan for the proposed project. 72. Organics Enclosure Signage. The applicant shall provide details of the signage placed on the centralized community organics enclosures that details the rules and restrictions of the enclosures. 73. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to (3.61) acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a (15.91%) credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 74. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated June 4, 2018, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 75. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated December 6, 2019, a copy of which is attached. 76. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated June 4, 2018, a copy of which is attached. 77. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton and Associates, Inc transmittal dated October 23, 2018, a copy of which is attached. 78. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 79. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 80. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 81. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 82. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 83. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 84. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 85. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. 86. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 87. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following vehicular movements restrictions: a. The future access onto Ynez Road from the project's entry shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out/left-in movement. b. The future access onto Date Street from Temecula Center Drive shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out/left-in movement. 88. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 89. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 90. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies. 91. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 92. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 93. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 94. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 95. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 96. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 97. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 98. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 99. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 100. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 101. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 102. Ingress/Egress Easement. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over adjacent properties. The easement information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 103. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 104. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 105. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 106. Traffic Signal Plans. The developer shall submit traffic signal plans for review and approval for the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive to include signal interconnect with the signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. 107. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 108. Traffic C ontrol Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 109. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 110. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 111. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map No. 37509 shall be approved and recorded. 112. Traffic Signal Installation. Prior to issuance of the FIRST building permit, the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive shall be operational. 113. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Date Street from Ynez Road to Temecula Center Drive (Urban Arterial (8 lanes divided) Standard No. 100B – 134’ (min) R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median. b. Ynez Road (Principal Arterial (6 lanes divided) Standard No. 100 – 110’ R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median modification. c. Temecula Center Drive (Private Street) from Ynez Road to Date Street (Standard No. 103A – 66’- 78’ R/E) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). d. Streets B, C, D and E (Private Street – 60’ R/E) to include dedication of full-width street, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). e. Street A (Private Street – 58’ R/E) to include dedication of full-width street, installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing, striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 114. Undergrounding Wires. All existing and proposed electrical and telecommunication lines, except electrical lines rated 34KV or greater, shall be installed underground per Title 15, Chapter 15.04 of the Temecula Municipal Code and utility provider’s standards. The developer is responsible for any associated costs, for making arrangements with each utility agency and for obtaining the necessary easements 115. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 116. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 117. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 118. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 119. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 120. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 121. Street improvements. Prior to issuance of the FIRST Certificate of Occupancy, the street improvements on the following streets shall be completed: a. Ynez Road b. Date Street c. Temecula Center Drive. 122. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 123. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2019 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2019 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2019 California Energy Codes, 2019 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 124. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 125. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 126. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 127. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 128. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 129. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 130. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 131. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 132. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 133. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 134. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 135. At Plan Review Submittal Submitting Plans and Calculations. Applicant must submit to Building and Safety four (4) complete sets of plans and two (2) sets of supporting calculations for review and approval including: a. An electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing schematic, and mechanical plan applicable to scope of work. b. A Sound Transmission Control Study in accordance with the provisions of the Section 1207, of the 2016 edition of the California Building Code. c. A precise grading plan to verify accessibility for persons with disabilities. d. Truss calculations that have been stamped by the engineer of record of the building and the truss manufacturer engineer. 136. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 137. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. 138. Prior to Beginning of Construction Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre -construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 139. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For this project hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The fire hydrant and sprinkler line will be its own dedicated fire line and not share with the domestic line. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 140. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5). 141. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 142. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,500GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 143. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. There shall be no obstructions within the 24-feet of clear width. No parking, no trash bins, absolutely no obstructions. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 144. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, cement or asphalt, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 145. Turning Radius (Cul de sac). Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet for Multi-Family dwelling tracts and 37 feet for single family dwellings (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula City Ordinance 15.16.020). 146. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 80,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 147. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 148. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 149. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued. The fire service line will feed the on-site fire hydrants and the fire sprinkler lines for all the homes. It will not share with any other equipment. (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 150. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans for each home must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. A set of plans will be required for each single family dwelling home (not model type) along with hydraulic calculations. The town homes are being constructed as a R3 Occupancy, per CRC Section 302.2 and will also comply with Section 313.3 of the CRC for sprinkler requirements. A NFPA 13D residential sprinkler system is allowed for this R3 Occupancy and the owners are choosing to utilize this option. Each single family home (R3 Occupancy) within the 6-plexes and 4-plexes will have their own dedicated fire sprinkler system and permits will be required for each individual home. The fire sprinkler riser will be located in each of the garages and be accessible to the fire department. Each home will have their own bell placed on the front of their home for notification purposes. Each garage will have their own dedicated fire sprinkler spare head box. 151. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans are not required for this project. Since all the homes are being built as a R3 occupancy, each home is considered a single family dwelling. This also applies to all the townhomes. If the construction type changes then a fire alarm system will be required for monitoring the fire sprinkler system for each building and a dedicated fire monitoring room with exterior access will be required. 152. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Address Directory (Multi-Family). A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 153. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 154. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (City Ordinance 15.16.020). 155. Knox Box. A “Knox -Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the electrical room for each building. (CFC Chapter 5). 156. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Residential buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with individual numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have 4-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and City Ordinance 15.16.020). 157. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 158. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable 159. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 160. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 161. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 162. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 163. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 164. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 165. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 166. Crime Prevention through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 167. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 168. County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 ● RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 KEITH JONES, DIRECTOR Office Locations ● Blythe ● Corona ● Hemet ● Indio ● Murrieta ● Palm Springs ● Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org December 6, 2019 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA – HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN Dear Mr. Cooper: In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s): PA18-0659 – A General Plan Amendment to amend the underling General Plan Land Use designations for Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has no objections as long as the proposal utilizes water and sanitary sewer service from an appropriate purveyor(s) and specific project development is sent to DEH for review. PA18-0660 – A specific Plan Amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan for residential overlay within Area 12. Department of Environmental Health (DEH) has no objections as long as the proposal utilizes water and sanitary sewer service from an appropriate purveyor(s) and specific project development is sent to DEH for review. PA18-0661 – Development plan for 324 unit single family community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes, townhomes and duplexes. See the following headings for additional comments. PA18-0662 – A Tentative Tract Map (37509) to allow for the creation of 215 lots for residential development. See the following headings for additional comments. POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER These project(s) are indicating that all lots developed under this specific plan are proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from (EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as, all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM Based on the information provided in the environmental assessment documents submitted for this project and with the provision that the information was accurate and representative of site conditions, RCDEH-ECP concludes no further environmental assessment is required for this project. If contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact RCDEH-ECP at (951) 955-8980, for further information. *Note: Comments for ECP are only applicable for PA18-0661 and PA18-0662. Specific development of PA18-0659 and PA18-0660 have yet to be evaluated by this program since their Assessor’s Parcel Numbers were not included in the Phase I Environmental Assessment (ESA) report conducted by Group Delta dated October 11, 2017. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES – POOL AND SPA If a pool or spa is proposed, prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate pool/spa permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite “A” Murrieta CA 92563 INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE (IH) This department will no longer be conducting noise evaluations and review of any future noise reports will be the responsibility of the City of Temecula. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim@rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Supervising REHS Department of Environmental Health October 23, 2018 Project No. 11760.010 City of Temecula, Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review #2 Proposed Harveston Development (PA18-0661) Northwest of Ynez road and Date Street, Temecula, California Reference: Geotechnical Investigation for Harveston II, Temecula Site, by Group Delta, dated September 4, 2018 PN: IR-683A. Geotechnical Peer Review, Proposed Harveston Development (PA18-0661), Northwest of Ynez Road and Date Street, Temecula California, by Leighton Consulting Inc., dated June 14, 2018. In accordance with your request, we reviewed the above referenced geotechnical report prepared by Group Delta that was submitted in response to our comments dated June 14, 2018. It is our opinion that the updated version of the submitted geotechnical investigation report is generally satisfactory and substantially addresses our comments. Please note that Group Delta remains the Geotechnical Consultant of record on this project and is liable for the findings and recommendations included in their report. Group Delta should be provided the opportunity to review rough grade plans and update their recommendations, if needed. A final geotechnical report should be submitted after completion of site grading and prior to building permit issuance to confirm that the earthwork recommendations included in the geotechnical report have been properly implemented during subgrade preparation / site grading. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to City and please do not hesitate to us if you have any question. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Robert F. Riha, CEG 1921 Senior Principal Geologist Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE 2641 Principal Engineer Distribution: (1)Addressee (PDF copy via email) PROJECT #19025 CREATED 6/17/2019 Revisions 9/24/2019 "B" ELEVATIONS Revisions 10/2/2019 COTTAGE SCHEME 1 STUCCO 1628 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW6120 BELIEVABLE BUFF SECONDARY STUCCO SW9097 SOFT FAWN STUCCO:OMEGA FASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLES SW6103 TEA CHEST PAINT:SHERWIN WILLIAMS GARAGE DOOR SW6103 TEA CHEST ROOF:EAGLE FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1 SW6152 SUPERIOR BRONZE STONE:BORAL FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2 SW6090 JAVA ROOF: FLAT SLATE BEL AIR 4621 TEHACHAPI BLEND STONE: MOUNTAIN LEDGE DURANGO "C" ELEVATIONS CRAFTSMAN SCHEME 2 STUCCO 1548 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW7507 STONE LION SECONDARY STUCCO SW7508 TAVERN TAUPE FASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOOR SW7040 SMOKEHOUSE BOARD & BATTEN SIDING SW6152 SUPERIOR BRONZE LAP SIDING SW7549 STUDIO TAUPE FRONT DOOR 1 SW7730 FORESTWOOD FRONT DOOR 2 SW6076 TURKISH COFFEE ROOF: FLAT SHAKE PONDEROSA SCP8802 NANTUCKET BLEND ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. *** For photoshop renderings only, do NOT use in the field HEIRLOOM FARMS 2 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CA PROJECT #19025 CREATED 6/17/2019 Revisions 10/2/2019 "A" ELEVATIONS SPANISH SCHEME 1 STUCCO 432 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW7102 WHITE FLOUR SECONDARY STUCCO SW7506 LOGGIA STUCCO:OMEGA FASCIA / TRIM SW7514 FOOTHILLS PAINT:SHERWIN WILLIAMS GARAGE DOOR SW7513 SANDERLING ROOF:EAGLE FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1 SW0032 NEEDLEPOINT NAVY STONE:BORAL FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2 SW7580 CARNELIAN DECO TILE:ROCK MILL GABLE END DETAIL / CLAY PIPES SW6061 TANBARK WROUGHT IRON SW6990 CAVIAR ROOF: "S" TILE MALIBU 2773 WALNUT CREEK BLEND DECO TILE FD 193B "B" ELEVATIONS COTTAGE SCHEME 2 STUCCO 1578 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW6064 RETICENCE SECONDARY STUCCO SW9084 COCOA WHIP FASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLES SW6082 COBBLE BROWN GARAGE DOOR SW6082 COBBLE BROWN RAILING SW6083 SABLE FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 1 SW7675 SEALSKIN FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS 2 SW7591 RED BARN ROOF: FLAT SLATE BEL AIR 4671 VILLAGE BLEND STONE: CYPRESS RIDGE ORCHARD ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. *** For photoshop renderings only, do NOT use in the field HEIRLOOM FARMS 3 STORY TOWNHOMES TEMECULA, CA PROJECT #19025 CREATED 6/17/2019 Revisions 9/24/2019 "A" ELEVATIONS Planning Rev 1/7/2020 SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME 2 SCHEME 3 STUCCO 432 1621 1531 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW7102 WHITE FLOUR SW7521 DORMER BROWN SW7683 BUFF FASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOOR SW7514 FOOTHILLS SW6104 KAFFEE SW9115 COWBOY BOOTS STUCCO:OMEGA FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS SW0032 NEEDLEPOINT NAVY SW7580 CARNELIAN SW7745 MUDDLED BASIL PAINT:SHERWIN WILLIAMS GABLE END DETAIL SW6061 TANBARK SW6061 TANBARK SW6061 TANBARK ROOF:EAGLE WROUGHT IRON SW6990 CAVIAR SW6990 CAVIAR SW6990 CAVIAR STONE:BORAL ROOF: "S" TILE MALIBU 2773 WALNUT CREEK BLEND 2702 CALABAR BLEND 2636 PIEDMONT BLEND DECORATIVE TILE ROCK MILL DECORATIVE TILE FD193 B PD 147 FD 148 "B" ELEVATIONS COTTAGE SCHEME 4 SCHEME 5 SCHEME 6 STUCCO 1628 1548 1565 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW6120 BELIEVABLE BUFF SW7507 STONE LION SW7029 AGREEABLE GRAY FASCIA / TRIM / GARAGE DOOR / GABLE SIDING SW6152 SUPERIOR BRONZE SW7040 SMOKEHOUSE SW7026 GRIFFIN FRONT DOOR / SHUTTERS SW7730 FORESTWOOD SW6076 TURKISH COFFEE SW7075 WEB GRAY ROOF: FLAT SLATE BEL AIR 4621 TEHACHAPI BLEND 4689 BROWN RANGE 4687 BROWN GRAY RANGE "C" ELEVATIONS CRAFTSMAN SCHEME 7 SCHEME 8 SCHEME 9 STUCCO 1588 1553 1549 STUCCO PAINT MATCH***SW7639 ETHEREAL MOOD SW7536 BITTERSWT STEM SW7535 SANDY RIDGE FASCIA / TRIM SW7570 EGRET WHITE SW7028 INCREDIBLE WHITE SW7100 ARCADE WHITE GABLE SIDING / GARAGE DOOR SW6146 UMBER SW6152 SUPERIOR BRONZE SW6103 TEA CHEST FRONT DOOR SW7745 MUDDLED BASIL SW7675 SEALSKIN SW6069 FRENCH ROAST ROOF: FLAT SHAKE PONDEROSA SCP8802 NANTUCKET SCP8803 ARLINGTON BLEND 5671 VILLAGE BLEND STONE: COUNTRY LEDGESTONE DRYSTACK INSTALLATION GRAND MESA HUDSON BAY RED ROCK ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. *** For photoshop renderings only, do NOT use in the field HEIRLOOM FARMS CLUSTER TEMECULA, CA PROJECT 19025 CREATED 6/20/2019 SHINGLE SIDING SW7591 RED BARN PAINT:SHERWIN WILLIAMS FASCIA / TRIM / LAP SIDING AT GABLES SW6236 GRAY'S HARBOR ROOF: EAGLE DOORS SW7006 EXTRA WHITE STONE:CULTURED STONE by BORAL TILE AT SHOWERS KEYSTONES SUEDE GRAY D182 (2x4) BRICK JOINT MOSAIC TILE:DALTILE STONE: COUNTRY LEDGESTONE DRYSTACK INSTALLATION HUDSON BAY ROOF: FLAT SHAKE PONDEROSA SCP8805 SEATTLE BLEND *** FOR PHOTOSHOP & RENDERING PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT USE IN THE FIELD ALL FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ALL EXPOSED STRUCTURAL HARDWARE TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE HEIRLOOM FARMS COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME TEMECULA, CA PC RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA18-0662, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 37509) FOR THE CREATION OF 111 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, 31 CONDOMINIUM LOTS AND 9 OPEN SPACE LOTS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF DATE STREET AND YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On May 7, 2018, MLC Holdings, Inc filed two Planning Applications: No. 18-0661, a Development Plan and No. PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509). These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on January 6, 2021, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA18-0662, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the Residential Overlay of the Harveston Specific Plan is 1,000. The proposed project proposes the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots, and 9 open space lots. As such, the total number of residential units are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Harveston Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been subject to any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Residential Overlay within the Harveston Specific Plan which allows for 1,000 residential units. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 1,000 residential units with a minimum lot size of 2,000 square feet and average lot area of 2,500 square feet. The Tentative Map proposes an average lot size of 2,989 square feet and a minimum lot size of 2,639 square feet. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone (EIR No. SCH# 2019070974). The SEIR identified seven (7) areas where no impacts were discovered. These areas are: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, and Wildfire. The analysis identified seven (7) areas where impacts were not considered to be significant. These areas include: Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems. The SEIR recommended feasible mitigation measures for environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact in the following areas: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted in connection with the SEIR. Consequently, the Tentative Map, which implements the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, based on the analysis in the SEIR. In addition, while the SEIR identified Air Quality as creating significant and unavoidable impacts, in accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted stating that the significant adverse project effects are acceptable because the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the City Council adopted Findings of Facts in Support of Findings that identify that, with respect to Air Quality, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR. The Findings of Fact in Support of Findings are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Because the Tentative Map implements the Harveston Specific Plan as amended, these same considerations and findings apply here.. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Map: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map for 111 single family lots, 31 condominium lots, and 9 open space lots is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 6th day of January, 2021. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 6th day of January, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA18-0662 A Tentative Tract Map (No. 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-400-034 916-400-035 916-400-036 916-400-039 916-400-060 N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) MSHCP Category: Residential (Attached & Detached) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) Single-Family with Attached Garage January 6, 2021 January 6, 2024 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements Indemnification of the City. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City and its attorneys from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any ag ency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 1. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 2. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13). 4. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2002-026470 recorded on January 16, 2002 and Amendments. 5. Compliance with EIR. The Harveston Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2020 to allow for residential development on the project site. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified as part of this effort (EIR SCH No. 2019070974). The project and all subsequent projects within the site have been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within. 6. Modifications or Revisions. The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 7. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 8. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. 9. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 10. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to (3.61) acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a (15.91%) credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 11. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. SCH# 2019070974 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division. 12. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be re quired during the course of the review. 13. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 14. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer’s sole cost and expense. 15. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 16. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality Management Plan. 17. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 18. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 19. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the City Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 20. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 21. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 22. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 23. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant’s signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 37509 require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. _____________________ Luke Watson Director Community Development Approved as to Form: _____________________ Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 24. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article ___ CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA ____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. ____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. ____3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Federal, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. ____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. 25. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 26. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 27. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 28. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 29. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 30. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) 31. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, traffic signal plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 32. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 33. Access restriction. The future access onto public streets shall be restricted as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 34. Landscaped Plans (for parkways and medians). The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards. b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped parkways, medians or public parks until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility. 35. Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, and/or (iv) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, then d. Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 36. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 37. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 38. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 39. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 40. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; b. Rancho California Water District; c. Eastern Municipal Water District; d. Cable TV Franchise; e. Telephone Company; f. Southern California Edison Company; g. The Gas Company; or other affected agencies 41. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive rights of access as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 42. Easements. Note the following: a. An easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 43. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to issuance of any permit. 44. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements (including parkways and medians improvements) to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Date Street from Ynez Road to Temecula Center Drive (Urban Arterial (8 lanes divided) Standard No. 100B – 134’ (min) R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median. b. Ynez Road (Principal Arterial (6 lanes divided) Standard No. 100 – 110’ R/W) to include installation of paving, curb and gutter, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer) and raised landscaped median modification. c. Temecula Center Drive (Private Street) from Ynez Road to Date Street (Standard No. 103A – 66’- 78’ R/E) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 45. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 46. Traffic Signal Installation. The developer shall design and guarantee installation of the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive to include signal interconnect with the signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. 47. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve Street A (Private Street - 58’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. c. Improve Streets B, C, D and E (Private Street - 60’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. d. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. e. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). f. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 48. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 49. Acquisition of Offsite Property. The developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire required offsite property interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the developer shall, prior to submittal of the Tract or Parcel Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to Subdivision Map Act, Sections 66462 and 66462.5. The agreement shall provide for payment by the developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the offsite property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the developer (at developer’s cost). The apprai ser shall be approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 50. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. 51. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 52. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 53. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; or other affected agencies. 54. Traffic Signal Plans. The developer shall submit traffic signal plans for review and approval for the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive to include signal interconnect with the signal(s) at the intersection(s) of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. 55. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 56. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 24, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 57. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 58. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement.. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 59. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 60. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 61. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 62. Geological Report. The developer shall complete any outstanding County geologist’s requirements, recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 63. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 64. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 65. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 66. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Prior to issuance of the FIRST building permit, Tract Map Number 37509 shall be approved and recorded. 67. Traffic Signal Installation. Prior to issuance of the FIRST building permit, the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive shall be operational. 68. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engin eer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 69. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 70. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 71. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 72. Street improvements. Prior to issuance of the FIRST Certificate of Occupancy, the street improvements on the following streets shall be completed: a. Ynez Road b. Date Street c. Temecula Center Drive. 73. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 74. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2019 edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2019 California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, 2019 California Energy Codes, 2019 California Green Building Standards, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and City of Temecula Municipal Code. 75. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 76. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 77. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 78. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 79. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 80. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 81. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Ordinance 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 82. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 83. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 84. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 85. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Onsite Water and Sewer Plans. Onsite water and sewer plans, submitted separately from the building plans, shall be submitted to Building and Safety for review and approval. 86. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Plans Require Stamp of Registered Professional. Applicant shall provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on the plans. 87. Prior to Beginning of Construction Pre-Construction Meeting. A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the building construction. 88. 555 W. Beech Street, Suite 460 San Diego, California 92101 PHONE: 619 718 9500 FAX: 619 718 9508 WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 20116kal 19454.049.003 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BERKELEY A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY DEBBIE M. KERN DAVID DOEZEMA KEVIN FEENEY LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RABE GREGORY D. SOO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY TIM BRETZ SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA MEMORANDUM To: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms - Fiscal Impact Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Objective In accordance with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.’s (KMA’s) agreement for consultant services with the City of Temecula (City), KMA has undertaken a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for the Heirloom Farms project (Project). As background, Bieri Co. Inc. (Developer) has proposed a residential development plan for the 25.40-acre property at the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road (Site) in the Harveston Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The Project is proposed to include 320 single-family units comprised of detached homes, attached townhomes, and duplexes. Due to the proposed change in land use type, completion of the Project will require a Specific Plan and General Plan amendment. This FIA prepared by KMA evaluated the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the proposed Project over a 20-year time period. The 20-year time period begins at the sale of the Project’s first residential unit, which is assumed to be Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 and ending in FY 2041. B. Methodology In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 2 20116kal 19454.049.003 • Reviewed background materials and planning/zoning documents relevant to the Project and the Site. • Reviewed the City’s FY 2020 General Fund Operating Budget to understand the City’s fiscal condition and revenue/expenditure parameters. • Interviewed key City staff regarding cost of service structure and approach to provide services to the Project. • Collected and reviewed demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. • Reviewed trade area residential market data provided by the Developer. • Estimated recurring annual revenues and municipal service expenditures as a result of the Project. It should be noted that this FIA was completed between July 2019 and March 2020, just prior to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Therefore, the estimates of current and projected future fiscal impact contained in this report do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the pandemic and national recession that may follow. C. Report Organization Following this introduction, this FIA is organized as follows: • Section II presents a summary of the KMA key findings. • Section III provides a projection of the fiscal impact of the Project on the City’s General Fund over a 20-year time period. • Finally, Section IV presents limiting conditions pertaining to this report. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Project – 20-Year Fiscal Impact • The Project is estimated to yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund, each year, over the projected 20-year period. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 3 20116kal 19454.049.003 • The major revenue categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include indirect (off- site) sales tax, Measure S, property tax, property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fee (VLF), and franchise fees. • The major expenditure categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include Police, Fire, Public Works, General Government, and Community Development. • The Project’s fiscal impact is estimated at negative $128,000, or negative $401 per unit, in stabilized Year 4 (FY 2025 dollars) and is projected to reach negative $537,000, or negative $1,678 per unit, in Year 20 (FY 2041 dollars) as shown in Table II-1 below. Table II-1: Fiscal Impact of Project FY 2025 FY 2041 General Fund Revenues $539,000 $783,000 General Fund Expenditures ($667,000) ($1,320,000) Annual Net Fiscal Impact to City Deficit per Unit per Year Revenue to Expense Ratio ($128,000) ($401) 0.81 ($537,000) ($1,678) 0.59 III. 20-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT A. Overview of Methodology This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed Project. The detailed KMA 20-year fiscal impact model is provided in Appendices A and B of this report and summarized below. Demographic and Economic Overview Table III-1 presents the findings of the KMA review of demographic and economic factors for the City. The data consist of population, number of housing units, and total jobs. More detail is presented in Appendix A, Table A-1. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 4 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-1: Demographic and Economic Overview, City of Temecula 2019 Estimate Population 113,826 Housing Units 34,078 Jobs 49,647 Overview of City General Fund Budget Table III-2 below provides an overview of the City’s FY 2020 General Fund budget. A more detailed analysis can be found in Appendix A, Table A-2. As shown, the City was operating at a net surplus of $1.8 million in FY 2020. Appendix A, Tables A-3 and A-4 also show the department revenues and expenditures used to calculate the per capita impacts to the General Fund from the development of the proposed Project. The revenues shown are strictly departmental revenues and exclude such revenues as property and sales tax, which are estimated based on projected increases in assessed value and taxable sales as a result of incremental development, respectively. The expenditures used in this analysis reflect a deduction for citizen/user payments in the form of Charges for Services to yield net (unreimbursed) expenditures. B. Key Assumptions – Project As shown in Table III-3 below, the Project will include 320 attached townhome and detached single-family residential units. A more detailed description of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-2. Table III-3: Project Description Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) 60 Units Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) 149 Units Single-Family Detached 111 Units Total Units 320 Units Table III-2: City of Temecula, Mid-Year FY 2020 General Fund Budget General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Net Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio $80,128,000 ($78,312,000) $1,816,000 1.02 To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 5 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-4 below presents the assumed absorption schedule for the Project. The Developer anticipates that for each product type, the first closing will occur during FY 2022 until all units are sold by FY 2025. A more detailed analysis of the projected annual absorption of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-3. C. Key Assumptions to Fiscal Impact Projection General Approach Assumptions used in the FIA are based on an assessment of future circumstances regarding population, employment, property valuation, and taxable sales. It should be noted that this fiscal impact analysis was completed between July 2019 and March 2020, just prior to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Therefore, the estimates of current and projected future fiscal impact contained in this report do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the pandemic and national recession that may follow. Table III-5 below provides a summary of the key assumptions used in this analysis. Table III-5: Key Assumptions Population Resident Equivalents Residential Value 3.0-3.5 0.33 $388,000 - $485,000 persons per unit employees per resident per unit (FY 2020) (1) (1) Source: Developer, July 19, 2019. The FIA also estimates other General Fund revenues and expenditures based on a modified per capita measure known as “resident equivalents.” The approach combines residents and employees to form a single service population. As summarized below, the resident equivalent approach weighs an employee as 0.33 residents, such that three employees are viewed as having the same impact as one resident. Table III-4: Anticipated Schedule of Development (1) FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 Total Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) 27 33 0 0 60 Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) 32 48 48 21 149 Single-Family Detached 30 36 36 9 111 Total Units 89 117 84 30 320 (1) Source: Developer, July 19, 2019. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 6 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-6: Total Resident Equivalents Total Population Total Employment Total Population + Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (1) City of Temecula 113,826 49,647 163,473 130,210 Heirloom Farms Project 965 0 965 965 (1) Assumes a resident equivalent factor of 0.33 (three employees have approximately the same impact as one resident). General Fund Revenues This section discusses the recurring General Fund revenue assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the proposed Project. Annual recurring revenues generated by the Project, such as Property Tax and Sales and Use Tax, were estimated based on assumed real estate market factors such as market values of the residential uses. One-time revenues, such as Development Impact Fees and building permits used to offset one-time City costs, were not evaluated in this FIA. 1. Franchise Fees; Licenses and Permits; and Fines and Forfeitures; and other revenues were estimated by applying a per capita or “per resident equivalent” to the number of new residents anticipated for the Project. 2. As shown in Table III-7 below, KMA applied the following escalation factors to estimate the annual General Fund revenues to the City over a 20-year period. The annual escalation factors were based on KMA’s review of recent historical valuation trends in the City, as well as discussions with the City’s Finance Department. Table III-7: Annual Revenue Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Assessed Value (1) Pre-Build-out Post-Build-out Sales Tax Measure S Special Tax (Measure C) Franchise Fees Other General Fund Revenues 5.0% 2.0% 5.0% (2) 5.0% (2) 0.0% 1.5% 2.5% (1) Reflects assumed market escalation. (2) Escalation is reduced to 2.50% after Project build-out (Year 4, FY 2025). To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 7 20116kal 19454.049.003 General Fund Expenditures This section discusses the recurring annual General Fund expenditure assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the Project at build-out. Annual recurring expenditures, including Fire, Public Works, and City Council, were estimated by applying a per capita or “per resident equivalent” cost estimate to the number of new residents anticipated from build-out of the Project, with the exception of Police. To estimate Police expenditures, KMA applied the Project’s pro rata share of one (1) new police officer, at an approximate annual cost of $327,000, per 1,000 population added to the City. Annual escalation factors for each major expenditure category were estimated by KMA based on five-year financial projections for the General Fund presented in the City’s Budget. As shown in Table III-8, General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase at escalation rates ranging between 2.0% and 5.0% per year. KMA also applied a marginal cost adjustment to each expenditure category to reflect that General Fund expenditures do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services, such as overhead and administrative functions within City government. As shown in Table III-8, the marginal cost adjustments assumed by KMA ranged between 0% (no adjustment to per capita assumptions) to 100% (expenditures not impacted by the Project). To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 8 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-8: Annual Expenditure Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Marginal Cost Impact Adjustment (1) Police Public Works – Land Development, Public Works, etc. Fire Public Works – Parks & Maintenance Community Development Finance City Clerk Retiree Medical Contribution City Attorney City Council Community Support PERS Replacement Benefit Property Tax Administration Asset Management Fund General Government 5.00% 2.50% 5.00% 2.50% 2.75% 2.75% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.75% 2.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.50% 2.50% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 90.0% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 100.0% 30.0% 0.0% 40.0% (1) Reflects adjustment to expenditure categories that do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between population growth and demand for municipal services. For example, an increase in population will demand 95% of Police municipal services expenditures per net new resident equivalent. D. Annual Fiscal Impact to General Fund General Fund Revenues Table III-9 summarizes the KMA estimate of recurring General Fund revenues during the Project’s build- out year (FY 2025). As shown, Sales Tax and Measure S revenues, in the form of off-site resident spending captured within the City, represent the largest components of General Fund revenues as a result of the Project. The Project’s 965 new residents are expected to generate $239,000 of net new revenues (in the form of Sales Tax/Measure S revenues) to the City in FY 2025. This represents about 44.3% of total revenues generated by the Project. Property Tax and Property Tax In-Lieu of Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues are the next largest source of General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project’s 320 residential units. In FY 2025, the Project is projected to generate approximately $97,000 in Property Tax and $97,000 in Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 9 20116kal 19454.049.003 revenues. In combination, these sources represent 36.0% of the total General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project. The other sources, including Franchise Fees, Property Transfer Tax, Measure C, Franchise Fees, and all other revenue sources, are anticipated to account for the remaining 19.7% of General Fund revenues generated by the Project. Table III-9: General Fund Revenues in FY 2025 Total % of Total Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax – Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In – Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues (Rounded) $97,000 $97,000 $10,000 $129,000 $110,000 $24,000 $31,000 $3,000 $7,000 $500 $30,000 $500 $539,000 18.0% 18.0% 1.9% 23.9% 20.4% 4.5% 5.8% 0.6% 1.3% 0.1% 5.6% 0.1% 100.0% General Fund Expenditures As shown in Table III-10, the total annual General Fund expenditures to provide services to the Project are estimated at $667,000 in FY 2025. Major expenditure categories were estimated based on projections from current service levels. As shown, the Project’s pro rata cost for Police represents the largest of the Project-generated expenditures at $382,000, or 57.3% of total expenditures. Fire services represent the second largest expenditure at $85,000, or 12.7% of the total Project-generated expenditures. The remaining departmental expenditures, including, but not limited to, Public Works, Asset Management Fund, and General Government, account for a combined $200,000, or 30.0% of total expenditures. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 10 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-10: General Fund Expenditures in FY 2025 Total % of Total Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works – Land Development, etc. Public Works – Park Maintenance Fire Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures (Rounded) $382,000 $3,000 $200 $23,000 $9,000 $5,000 $19,000 $22,000 $58,000 $34,000 $85,000 $500 $1,000 $0 $25,000 $667,000 57.3% 0.4% 0.0% 3.4% 1.3% 0.7% 2.8% 3.3% 8.7% 5.1% 12.7% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 3.7% 100.0% Annual Fiscal Impact Comparison of the annual revenues and annual expenditures generated by the Project indicates that it will yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund each year over the 20-year period. As shown in Table III-11, the Project’s net fiscal impact is estimated at negative $128,000, or negative $401 per unit, at build-out in Year 4 (FY 2025). The Project’s net fiscal impact reaches negative $537,000, or negative $1,678 per unit, by Year 20 (FY 2041). A more detailed analysis is presented in Appendix B. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 11 20116kal 19454.049.003 Table III-11: Annual General Fund Impact Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues (1) General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year (2) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 2022 $151,000 $164,000 ($13,000) ($40) 0.92 2023 $373,000 $393,000 ($20,000) ($64) 0.95 2024 $534,000 $580,000 ($46,000) ($146) 0.92 2025 $539,000 $667,000 ($128,000) ($401) 0.81 2026 $555,000 $696,000 ($141,000) ($439) 0.80 2027 $572,000 $725,000 ($153,000) ($479) 0.79 2028 $585,000 $757,000 ($172,000) ($538) 0.77 2029 $597,000 $789,000 ($192,000) ($600) 0.76 2030 $618,000 $823,000 ($205,000) ($643) 0.75 2031 $631,000 $859,000 ($228,000) ($712) 0.73 2032 $645,000 $896,000 ($251,000) ($786) 0.72 2033 $659,000 $935,000 ($276,000) ($864) 0.70 2034 $673,000 $976,000 ($303,000) ($947) 0.69 2035 $688,000 $1,019,000 ($331,000) ($1,035) 0.68 2036 $703,000 $1,063,000 ($360,000) ($1,127) 0.66 2037 $718,000 $1,110,000 ($392,000) ($1,226) 0.65 2038 $734,000 $1,159,000 ($425,000) ($1,329) 0.63 2039 $750,000 $1,210,000 ($460,000) ($1,439) 0.62 2040 $766,000 $1,264,000 ($498,000) ($1,556) 0.61 2041 $783,000 $1,320,000 ($537,000) ($1,678) 0.59 (1) Includes Project-generated Measure S revenues. (2) Represents annual General Fund impact per unit based on anticipated annual absorption for the Project. Full build-out of the Project does not occur until FY 2025. IV. LIMITING CONDITONS 1. The KMA analysis is based, in part, on data provided by secondary sources, such as state and local governments, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. While KMA believes that these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. 2. A projection of economic impacts is inherently based on judgment. While KMA considers these projections reasonable for planning purposes, it is the nature of forecasting that some assumptions may not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes may be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, may require review or revision of this report. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 12 20116kal 19454.049.003 3. The projections of future economic impact do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and national recession that is likely to follow. 4. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, Project-specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 5. Any estimates of revenue or cost projections are based on the best Project-specific and fiscal data available at this time as well as experience with comparable projects. They are not intended to be projections of actual future performance of any specific project. 6. Revenue estimates are based on the assumption that sufficient market support exists for the proposed uses and that the Project will achieve industry standard productivity levels. 7. KMA assumes that all applicable laws and governmental regulations in place as of the date of this document will remain unchanged throughout the projection period of our analysis. In the event that this does not hold true, i.e., if any tax rates change, the analysis would need to be revised. 8. Value estimates assume that any necessary entitlements or zoning changes for development can be obtained in a reasonable time frame. 9. Value estimates assume that property titles are good and marketable; no title search has been made, nor has KMA attempted to determine property ownership. The value estimates are given without regard to any questions of boundaries, encumbrances, liens, or encroachments. 10. Property tax projections reflect KMA's understanding of the assessment and tax apportionment procedures employed by the County. The County procedures are subject to change as a reflection of policy revisions or legislative mandate. While we believe our estimates to be reasonable, taxable values resulting from actual appraisals may vary from the amounts assumed in the projections. 11. No assurances are provided by KMA as to the certainty of the projected tax revenues shown in this document. Actual revenues may be higher or lower than what has been projected and are subject to valuation changes resulting from new developments or transfers of ownership not specifically identified herein, actual resolution of outstanding appeals, future filing of appeals, or the non- payment of taxes due. To: Luke Watson, City of Temecula October 26, 2020 Subject: Heirloom Farms – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 13 20116kal 19454.049.003 12. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective, new, or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). 13. KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor to the City and does not assume any fiduciary duty hereunder, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty to the City pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act with respect to the services provided hereunder and any information and material contained in KMA’s work product. 14. The City shall discuss any such information and material contained in KMA’s work product with any and all internal and/or external advisors and experts, including its own municipal advisors, that it deems appropriate before acting on the information and material. attachments APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS HEIRLOOM FARMS Demographic Profile and City of Temecula General Fund Budget DEMOGRAPHICS DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - CITY OF TEMECULA, 2019 ESTIMATES (1) HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Population Population 113,826 Average Household Size 3.34 Jobs (2)49,647 II.Housing Units Single-Family 29,972 82% Multi-Family 6,387 17% Mobile Homes 161 0% Total 36,520 100% III.Occupied Units 34,078 IV.Percent Vacant 6.7% (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2019. (2)Source: U.S. Census Bureau American FactFinder - Employment by Place of Work, 2013-2017 5-Year Estimates. TABLE A-1 2019 Estimates Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL FUND BUDGET - FY 2020 OPERATING BUDGET HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2020 Operating Budget I.Revenues Taxes and Franchises $53,893,154 Operating Transfers In $8,887,305 Intergovernmental Revenues $8,503,309 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges $4,459,772 Reimbursements $3,027,238 Fines and Forfeitures $849,620 Use of Money and Property $451,850 Miscellaneous Revenue $55,380 Total Revenues $80,127,628 II.Expenditures Police $34,860,436 Fire $10,260,935 Public Works $6,294,591 Parks Maintenance $3,958,507 Building & Safety $3,291,298 Finance $2,772,880 Planning $2,609,473 CIP Administration $2,417,537 Land Development $1,898,973 Economic Development $1,572,660 City Manager $1,583,685 Retiree Medical Contribution $1,500,000 City Clerk $1,452,596 Human Resources $1,282,559 City Attorney $942,300 City Council $572,843 Animal Control $475,235 Emergency Management $157,271 Community Support $125,000 Staffing Continuity Reserve $100,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $97,484 Property Tax Administration $85,529 Total Expenditures $78,311,792 III.Total Surplus/(Deficit)$1,815,836 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.02 TABLE A-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Revenues FY 2020 Operating Budget I.Revenues - Included in Analysis Taxes and Franchises Property Tax $8,706,389 projected based on increase in gross AV Sales and Use Tax (1)$36,602,322 projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development Franchise Fees $3,351,304 projected based on population Special Tax C $1,876,279 based on residential units and commercial acreage developed Total $50,536,294 Licenses and Permits (2)$290,000 projected based on population and employment Fines and Forfeitures $849,620 projected based on population and employment Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In Lieu of VLF $8,447,894 projected based on increase in gross AV Vehicle License Fees $55,415 projected based on population Total $8,503,309 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $3,151,887 projected based on population Miscellaneous Revenue $55,380 projected based on population and employment Total Included Items $63,386,490 II.Excluded Items Transient Occupancy Tax $3,338,860 hotel use not planned as part of Project Reimbursements Other Reimbursements $338,157 Pechanga IGA $343,148 Total Reimbursements $681,305 independent of projected incremental development Development Impact Fees $18,000 independent of projected incremental development Use of Money and Property $451,850 independent of projected incremental development Operating Transfers In Operating Transfer in Measure S $5,735,418 independent of projected incremental development Total $5,735,418 Capital Improvement Program $2,345,933 independent of projected incremental development Total Excluded Items $12,571,366 III.Charges for Services Deducted from Community Development Building $1,814,217 Development Fees $325,995 Planning $576,715 Total Deducted from Community Development $2,716,927 Deducted from Public Works Land Development $548,978 Parks Maintenance $1,000 Public Works $6,426 Total Deducted from Public works $556,404 Deducted from Police $144,113 Deducted from Fire $752,328 Total Charges for Services $4,169,772 IV.Total General Fund Revenues $80,127,628 (1)Includes Sales Tax Sharing Agreement. (2)Includes Business Licenses. TABLE A-3 Comments Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 16 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Net After Expenditures Deduction of FY 2020 Charges for Services Operating Budget (Table A-3) I.Expenditures Included in Analysis City Council $572,843 $0 $572,843 Community Support $125,000 $0 $125,000 General Government City Manager $1,583,685 Economic Development $1,572,660 Human Resources $1,282,559 Emergency Management $157,271 Total General Government $4,596,175 $0 $4,596,175 City Clerk $1,452,596 $0 $1,452,596 City Attorney $942,300 $0 $942,300 Finance Finance $2,772,880 Animal Control $475,235 Total Finance $3,248,115 $0 $3,248,115 Community Development Planning $2,609,473 Building & Safety $3,291,298 Total Community Development $5,900,771 ($2,716,927) $3,183,844 Public Works Land Development $1,898,973 Public Works $6,294,591 Total Public Works $8,193,564 ($548,978) $7,644,586 Public Works Parks Maintenance $3,958,507 ($7,426) $3,951,081 Fire $10,260,935 ($752,328) $9,508,607 Property Tax Administration $85,529 $0 $85,529 Retiree Medical Contribution $1,500,000 $0 $1,500,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $97,484 $0 $97,484 Total Included Items $40,933,819 $36,908,160 Add: Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 Grand Total Included Items $43,933,819 $39,908,160 II.Excluded Items Police (1)$34,860,436 ($144,113) $34,716,323 CIP Administration $2,417,537 Staffing Continuity Reserve $100,000 Total Excluded Items $37,377,973 $37,233,860 III.Total General Fund Expenditures $81,311,792 $77,142,020 (1) Per City; police expenditures included in analysis reflect project pro rata share of one new police officer per 1,000 population. TABLE A-4 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 17 APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS HEIRLOOM FARMS 20-Year Projection SUMMARY OF ANNUAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT GENERATED BY PROJECT HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2022 $150,681 $163,520 ($12,840)($40)0.92 2 2023 $372,631 $393,045 ($20,414)($64)0.95 3 2024 $533,564 $580,140 ($46,577)($146)0.92 4 2025 $538,637 $667,075 ($128,438)($401)0.81 5 2026 $555,097 $695,580 ($140,483)($439)0.80 6 2027 $572,188 $725,387 ($153,199)($479)0.79 7 2028 $584,518 $756,556 ($172,038)($538)0.77 8 2029 $597,136 $789,154 ($192,018)($600)0.76 9 2030 $617,649 $823,251 ($205,602)($643)0.75 10 2031 $631,041 $858,913 ($227,872)($712)0.73 11 2032 $644,736 $896,215 ($251,479)($786)0.72 12 2033 $658,749 $935,244 ($276,495)($864)0.70 13 2034 $673,082 $976,072 ($302,990)($947)0.69 14 2035 $687,741 $1,018,789 ($331,048)($1,035)0.68 15 2036 $702,741 $1,063,489 ($360,748)($1,127)0.66 16 2037 $718,086 $1,110,263 ($392,177)($1,226)0.65 17 2038 $733,781 $1,159,215 ($425,434)($1,329)0.63 18 2039 $749,842 $1,210,440 ($460,598)($1,439)0.62 19 2040 $766,268 $1,264,058 ($497,790)($1,556)0.61 20 2041 $783,071 $1,320,183 ($537,112)($1,678)0.59 TABLE B-1 Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed to Date Revenues to Expenditures Ratio Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 18 PROJECT DESCRIPTION HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Site Area 25.40 Acres II.Density 15.75 Units/Acre III.Unit Mix A.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units B.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units C.Single-Family Detached 111 Units D.Total Units 320 Units TABLE B-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 19 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ABSORPTION HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units 27 33 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 27 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units 32 48 48 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 32 80 128 149 149 149 149 149 149 149 III.Single-Family Detached 111 Units 30 36 36 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 30 66 102 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 IV.Total Cumulative Units 320 Units 89 206 290 320 320 320 320 320 320 320 TABLE B-3 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 20 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL POPULATION HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Total Resident I.Residential Factor (1)Persons/Unit (2)Population A.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units 5.0%3.00 171 B.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units 5.0%3.00 425 C.Single-Family Detached 111 Units 5.0%3.50 369 Total/Average 320 Units 5.0%3.02 965 II.Total Population 965 (1)KMA assumption reflecting average vacancy rate, based on typical lender underwriting criteria for residential uses. (2)KMA assumption based on industry standard household size by unit type. Dwelling Units TABLE B-4 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 21 POPULATION ESTIMATES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Factor Per Unit FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units 5.0%3.00 77 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units 5.0%3.00 91 228 365 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 III.Single-Family Detached 111 Units 5.0%3.50 100 219 339 369 369 369 369 369 369 369 IV.Total Population 268 618 875 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 22 POPULATION ESTIMATES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons Factor Per Unit I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units 5.0%3.00 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units 5.0%3.00 III.Single-Family Detached 111 Units 5.0%3.50 IV.Total Population TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 425 369 369 369 369 369 369 369 369 369 369 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 23 ESTIMATE OF ASSESSED VALUE HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2020 Sales Price/Value I.Residential Per Unit (1) A.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)60 Units $402,000 B.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)149 Units $388,000 C.Single-Family Detached 111 Units $485,000 Total/Average 320 Units $424,000 (1)Per Developer, July 19, 2019. Dwelling Units TABLE B-6 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 24 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$12,564,862 $28,941,065 $29,519,886 $30,110,284 $30,712,490 $31,326,739 $31,953,274 $32,592,340 $33,244,186 $33,909,070 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$14,373,072 $37,298,122 $61,813,552 $73,968,922 $75,448,301 $76,957,267 $78,496,412 $80,066,340 $81,667,667 $83,301,021 III.Single-Family Detached $16,843,444 $38,403,052 $61,454,989 $68,533,606 $69,904,278 $71,302,364 $72,728,411 $74,182,979 $75,666,639 $77,179,972 IV.Total Assessed Value $43,781,378 $104,642,239 $152,788,427 $172,612,812 $176,065,069 $179,586,370 $183,178,097 $186,841,659 $190,578,492 $194,390,063 (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 25 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Assessed Value (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $34,587,252 $35,278,997 $35,984,577 $36,704,268 $37,438,353 $38,187,121 $38,950,863 $39,729,880 $40,524,478 $41,334,967 $84,967,041 $86,666,382 $88,399,709 $90,167,704 $91,971,058 $93,810,479 $95,686,688 $97,600,422 $99,552,431 $101,543,479 $78,723,571 $80,298,043 $81,904,003 $83,542,083 $85,212,925 $86,917,184 $88,655,527 $90,428,638 $92,237,211 $94,081,955 $198,277,864 $202,243,422 $206,288,289 $210,414,055 $214,622,336 $218,914,784 $223,293,078 $227,758,940 $232,314,120 $236,960,401 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 26 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 5.64%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$7,085 $16,320 $16,646 $16,979 $17,319 $17,665 $18,018 $18,379 $18,746 $19,121 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$8,105 $21,032 $34,857 $41,711 $42,545 $43,396 $44,264 $45,149 $46,052 $46,973 III.Single-Family Detached $9,498 $21,656 $34,654 $38,646 $39,419 $40,207 $41,012 $41,832 $42,668 $43,522 IV.Total Property Tax Revenues $24,688 $59,008 $86,157 $97,336 $99,283 $101,268 $103,294 $105,360 $107,466 $109,616 TABLE B-8 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 27 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 5.64% I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Property Tax Revenues TABLE B-8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $19,504 $19,894 $20,292 $20,698 $21,112 $21,534 $21,964 $22,404 $22,852 $23,309 $47,913 $48,871 $49,849 $50,846 $51,863 $52,900 $53,958 $55,037 $56,138 $57,260 $44,392 $45,280 $46,186 $47,109 $48,052 $49,013 $49,993 $50,993 $52,013 $53,053 $111,809 $114,045 $116,327 $118,653 $121,027 $123,447 $125,915 $128,434 $131,003 $133,622 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 28 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$7,082 $16,312 $16,638 $16,971 $17,311 $17,657 $18,010 $18,370 $18,738 $19,112 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$8,101 $21,022 $34,840 $41,691 $42,525 $43,376 $44,243 $45,128 $46,031 $46,951 III.Single-Family Detached $9,494 $21,645 $34,638 $38,628 $39,400 $40,188 $40,992 $41,812 $42,648 $43,501 IV.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues $24,677 $58,979 $86,116 $97,290 $99,236 $101,221 $103,245 $105,310 $107,417 $109,564 TABLE B-9 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 29 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues TABLE B-9 OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $19,495 $19,884 $20,282 $20,688 $21,101 $21,524 $21,954 $22,393 $22,841 $23,298 $47,890 $48,848 $49,825 $50,821 $51,838 $52,875 $53,932 $55,011 $56,111 $57,233 $44,371 $45,259 $46,164 $47,087 $48,029 $48,989 $49,969 $50,969 $51,988 $53,028 $111,756 $113,991 $116,271 $118,596 $120,968 $123,388 $125,855 $128,373 $130,940 $133,559 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 30 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$6,911 $15,918 $1,624 $1,656 $1,689 $1,723 $1,757 $1,793 $1,828 $1,865 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$7,905 $20,514 $33,998 $4,068 $4,150 $4,233 $4,317 $4,404 $4,492 $4,582 III.Single-Family Detached $9,264 $21,122 $33,800 $3,769 $3,845 $3,922 $4,000 $4,080 $4,162 $4,245 IV.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $24,080 $57,553 $69,422 $9,493 $9,684 $9,878 $10,074 $10,277 $10,482 $10,692 TABLE B-10 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 31 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10% I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues TABLE B-10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $1,902 $1,940 $1,979 $2,019 $2,059 $2,100 $2,142 $2,185 $2,229 $2,273 $4,673 $4,767 $4,862 $4,959 $5,058 $5,160 $5,263 $5,368 $5,475 $5,585 $4,330 $4,416 $4,505 $4,595 $4,687 $4,780 $4,876 $4,974 $5,073 $5,175 $10,905 $11,123 $11,346 $11,573 $11,804 $12,040 $12,281 $12,527 $12,777 $13,033 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 32 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPENDING BY RESIDENTS HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Single-Family Single-Family Attached Townhomes Attached Townhomes Single-Family (2-Story)(3-Story)Detached I.Estimate of Household Income Average Sales Price $402,000 $388,000 $485,000 Down Payment 10%$40,200 $38,800 $48,500 Loan Amount $361,800 $349,200 $436,500 Interest Rate 5.25%5.25%5.25% Term (Years)30 30 30 Annual Mortgage Payment / Rent $24,000 $23,100 $28,900 HOA $250 /Month $3,000 $3,000 $3,000 Maintenance / Insurance $50 /Month $600 $600 $600 Property Taxes 2.00%$8,000 $7,800 $9,700 Total Annual Costs $35,600 $34,500 $42,200 % of Income Spent on Housing 35%35%35% Annual Income Required $102,000 $99,000 $121,000 II.Number of Households Total Number of Residential Units 149 60 111 Occupancy Rate 95%95%95% Total Number of Full-Time Equivalent Households 142 57 105 TABLE B-11 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename i: \Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 33 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$8,971 $20,933 $21,980 $23,079 $23,656 $24,247 $24,853 $25,475 $26,111 $26,764 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$10,320 $27,090 $45,511 $55,626 $58,408 $61,328 $62,861 $64,433 $66,044 $67,695 III.Single-Family Detached $11,825 $27,316 $44,326 $50,649 $53,181 $55,840 $57,236 $58,667 $60,134 $61,637 IV.Total Sales Tax Revenues $31,116 $75,339 $111,817 $129,354 $135,245 $141,415 $144,950 $148,575 $152,289 $156,096 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 34 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Sales Tax Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 G 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $27,433 $28,119 $28,822 $29,543 $30,281 $31,038 $31,814 $32,610 $33,425 $34,260 $69,387 $71,122 $72,900 $74,722 $76,590 $78,505 $80,468 $82,480 $84,542 $86,655 $63,178 $64,757 $66,376 $68,036 $69,737 $71,480 $73,267 $75,099 $76,976 $78,901 $159,998 $163,998 $168,098 $172,301 $176,608 $181,023 $185,549 $190,189 $194,943 $199,816 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 35 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents 33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$6,011 $17,374 $18,683 $19,617 $20,107 $20,610 $21,125 $21,653 $23,500 $24,088 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$6,914 $22,485 $38,684 $47,282 $49,647 $52,129 $53,432 $54,768 $59,439 $60,925 III.Single-Family Detached $7,923 $22,672 $37,677 $43,051 $45,204 $47,464 $48,651 $49,867 $54,120 $55,473 IV.Total Measure S Revenues $20,848 $62,531 $95,044 $109,950 $114,958 $120,203 $123,208 $126,288 $137,059 $140,486 % of Measure S Supporting General Fund Operations 67%83%85%85%85%85%85%85%90%90% TABLE B-13 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 36 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents 33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Measure S Revenues % of Measure S Supporting General Fund Operations TABLE B-13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $24,690 $25,307 $25,940 $26,588 $27,253 $27,934 $28,633 $29,349 $30,082 $30,834 $62,448 $64,010 $65,610 $67,250 $68,931 $70,655 $72,421 $74,232 $76,087 $77,990 $56,860 $58,282 $59,739 $61,232 $62,763 $64,332 $65,940 $67,589 $69,279 $71,011 $143,998 $147,599 $151,289 $155,070 $158,947 $162,921 $166,994 $171,170 $175,448 $179,835 90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%90% Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 37 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 113,826 (1)49,647 (2)163,473 130,210 Heirloom Farms 965 0 965 965 Amount Per City Resident or New Residents/ FY 2019-2020 Service Resident Resident Operating Budget (4)Population Equivalent Equivalents I.Franchise Fees $3,351,304 P $29.44 965 II.Licenses and Permits $290,000 RE $2.23 965 III.Fines and Forfeitures $849,620 RE $6.53 965 IV.Vehicle License Fees $55,415 P $0.49 965 V.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $3,151,887 P $27.69 965 VI.Miscellaneous Revenue $55,380 RE $0.43 965 VII.Total Other Revenues Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2019. (2) Source: U.S. Census Bureau American FactFinder - Employment by Place of Work, 2013-2017 5-Year Estimates. (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that approximately three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-3. TABLE B-14 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 38 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2019-2020 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Population FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Total Residential Population 268 618 875 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 II.Total Resident Equivalents 268 618 875 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$29.44 P $8,129 $19,027 $27,343 $30,608 $31,067 $31,533 $32,006 $32,486 $32,973 $33,468 Licenses and Permits $2.23 RE $627 $1,482 $2,151 $2,432 $2,492 $2,555 $2,619 $2,684 $2,751 $2,820 Fines and Forfeitures $6.53 RE $1,837 $4,343 $6,302 $7,124 $7,302 $7,485 $7,672 $7,864 $8,060 $8,262 Vehicle License Fees $0.49 P $137 $324 $470 $532 $545 $558 $572 $587 $601 $616 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $27.69 P $7,797 $18,428 $26,744 $30,233 $30,988 $31,763 $32,557 $33,371 $34,205 $35,061 Miscellaneous Revenue $0.43 RE $120 $283 $411 $464 $476 $488 $500 $513 $525 $539 VI.Total Other Revenues $18,647 $43,887 $63,421 $71,393 $72,870 $74,382 $75,926 $77,505 $79,115 $80,766 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 39 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2019-2020 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$29.44 P Licenses and Permits $2.23 RE Fines and Forfeitures $6.53 RE Vehicle License Fees $0.49 P Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $27.69 P Miscellaneous Revenue $0.43 RE VI.Total Other Revenues (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 $33,970 $34,479 $34,996 $35,521 $36,054 $36,595 $37,144 $37,701 $38,267 $38,841 $2,890 $2,963 $3,037 $3,113 $3,191 $3,270 $3,352 $3,436 $3,522 $3,610 $8,468 $8,680 $8,897 $9,119 $9,347 $9,581 $9,821 $10,066 $10,318 $10,576 $632 $648 $664 $680 $697 $715 $733 $751 $770 $789 $35,937 $36,836 $37,756 $38,700 $39,668 $40,660 $41,676 $42,718 $43,786 $44,880 $552 $566 $580 $594 $609 $625 $640 $656 $673 $689 $82,449 $84,172 $85,930 $87,727 $89,566 $91,446 $93,366 $95,328 $97,336 $99,385 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 40 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Single-Family (1)$74.44 /Parcel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story)$2,010 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story)$2,382 $5,955 $9,528 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 III.Single-Family Detached $2,233 $4,913 $7,593 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 IV.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $6,625 $15,334 $21,587 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 (1)All for-sale property is taxed at the Single-Family per unit rate. Source: City of Temecula, July 20, 2017. TABLE B-16 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 41 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Single-Family (1)$74.44 /Parcel I.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (2-Story) II.Single-Family Attached Townhomes (3-Story) III.Single-Family Detached IV.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue (1)All for-sale property is taxed at the Single-Family per unit rate. Source: City of Temecula, July 20, 2017. TABLE B-16 C) REVENUE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $4,466 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $11,092 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $8,263 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 Source: City of Temecula, July 20, 2017. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 42 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population /Jobs City of Temecula 113,826 (1)49,647 (2)163,473 130,210 Heirloom Farms 965 0 965 965 Amount Per Net New City Resident or New Residents/"Marginal Cost"Residents/ FY 2020 Escalation Service Population Resident Resident Impact Resident Operating Budget (4)Factor (5)Population Type Equivalent Equivalent Adjustment Equivalent I.Police ---5.00%------$326.81 (6)965 5%917 II.City Council $572,843 2.75%RE 130,210 $4.40 965 40%579 III.Community Support $125,000 2.00%RE 130,210 $0.96 965 80%193 IV.General Government $4,596,175 2.50%RE 130,210 $35.30 965 40%579 V.City Clerk $1,452,596 3.00%RE 130,210 $11.16 965 30%676 VI.City Attorney $942,300 2.00%RE 130,210 $7.24 965 40%579 VII.Finance $3,248,115 2.75%RE 130,210 $24.95 965 30%676 VIII.Community Development $3,183,844 2.75%RE 130,210 $24.45 965 20%772 IX.Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$7,644,586 2.50%RE 130,210 $58.71 965 10%869 X.Public Works - Parks Maintenance $3,951,081 2.50%P 113,826 $34.71 965 10%869 XI.Fire $9,508,607 5.00%RE 130,210 $73.03 965 5%917 XII.Property Tax Administration $85,529 2.00%RE 130,210 $0.66 965 30%676 XIII.Retiree Medical Contribution $1,500,000 3.00%RE 130,210 $11.52 965 90%97 XIV.PERS Replacement Benefit $97,484 3.00%RE 130,210 $0.75 965 100%0 XV.Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 2.50%RE 130,210 $23.04 965 0%965 XVI.Total Annual Expenditures $39,908,160 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2019. (2) Source: U.S. Census Bureau American FactFinder - Employment by Place of Work, 2013-2017 5-Year Estimates. (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-4. (5) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (6) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($326,808) per 1,000 population. Total Resident Equivalents (3) TABLE B-17 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 43 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2019-2020 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Population FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Total Residential Population 268 618 875 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 II.Total Resident Equivalents 268 618 875 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $326.81 (2)5.00%5%---$91,734 $222,112 $330,203 $382,376 $401,494 $421,569 $442,647 $464,780 $488,019 $512,420 City Council $4.40 2.75%40%RE $747 $1,770 $2,574 $2,917 $2,998 $3,080 $3,165 $3,252 $3,341 $3,433 Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE $54 $126 $182 $205 $209 $213 $217 $221 $226 $230 General Government $35.30 2.50%40%RE $5,963 $14,095 $20,455 $23,123 $23,701 $24,294 $24,901 $25,524 $26,162 $26,816 City Clerk $11.16 3.00%30%RE $2,220 $5,274 $7,691 $8,736 $8,998 $9,268 $9,546 $9,832 $10,127 $10,431 City Attorney $7.24 2.00%40%RE $1,211 $2,848 $4,113 $4,626 $4,719 $4,813 $4,909 $5,008 $5,108 $5,210 Finance $24.95 2.75%30%RE $4,941 $11,706 $17,030 $19,298 $19,829 $20,374 $20,935 $21,511 $22,102 $22,710 Community Development $24.45 2.75%20%RE $5,535 $13,114 $19,078 $21,619 $22,214 $22,824 $23,452 $24,097 $24,760 $25,441 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$58.71 2.50%10%RE $14,878 $35,165 $51,034 $57,690 $59,132 $60,611 $62,126 $63,679 $65,271 $66,903 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $34.71 2.50%10%P $8,796 $20,791 $30,173 $34,109 $34,961 $35,835 $36,731 $37,649 $38,591 $39,555 Fire $73.03 5.00%5%RE $20,498 $49,631 $73,784 $85,442 $89,714 $94,200 $98,910 $103,855 $109,048 $114,501 Property Tax Administration $0.66 2.00%30%RE $128 $302 $435 $490 $500 $510 $520 $530 $541 $552 Retiree Medical Contribution $11.52 3.00%90%RE $328 $778 $1,135 $1,289 $1,327 $1,367 $1,408 $1,450 $1,494 $1,539 PERS Replacement Benefit $0.75 3.00%100%RE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $23.04 2.50%0%RE $6,487 $15,333 $22,253 $25,155 $25,784 $26,429 $27,089 $27,766 $28,461 $29,172 IV.Total Annual Expenditures $163,520 $393,045 $580,140 $667,075 $695,580 $725,387 $756,556 $789,154 $823,251 $858,913 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($326,808) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 44 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2019-2020 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Population I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $326.81 (2)5.00%5%--- City Council $4.40 2.75%40%RE Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE General Government $35.30 2.50%40%RE City Clerk $11.16 3.00%30%RE City Attorney $7.24 2.00%40%RE Finance $24.95 2.75%30%RE Community Development $24.45 2.75%20%RE Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$58.71 2.50%10%RE Public Works - Parks Maintenance $34.71 2.50%10%P Fire $73.03 5.00%5%RE Property Tax Administration $0.66 2.00%30%RE Retiree Medical Contribution $11.52 3.00%90%RE PERS Replacement Benefit $0.75 3.00%100%RE Asset Management Fund $23.04 2.50%0%RE IV.Total Annual Expenditures (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($326,808) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 965 $538,041 $564,943 $593,190 $622,849 $653,992 $686,692 $721,026 $757,077 $794,931 $834,678 $3,527 $3,624 $3,724 $3,826 $3,932 $4,040 $4,151 $4,265 $4,382 $4,503 $235 $240 $244 $249 $254 $259 $265 $270 $275 $281 $27,486 $28,174 $28,878 $29,600 $30,340 $31,098 $31,876 $32,673 $33,490 $34,327 $10,744 $11,067 $11,399 $11,740 $12,093 $12,455 $12,829 $13,214 $13,610 $14,019 $5,314 $5,420 $5,529 $5,639 $5,752 $5,867 $5,985 $6,104 $6,226 $6,351 $23,334 $23,976 $24,635 $25,313 $26,009 $26,724 $27,459 $28,214 $28,990 $29,787 $26,140 $26,859 $27,598 $28,357 $29,136 $29,938 $30,761 $31,607 $32,476 $33,369 $68,575 $70,290 $72,047 $73,848 $75,694 $77,587 $79,526 $81,514 $83,552 $85,641 $40,544 $41,558 $42,597 $43,662 $44,753 $45,872 $47,019 $48,195 $49,399 $50,634 $120,226 $126,237 $132,549 $139,176 $146,135 $153,442 $161,114 $169,169 $177,628 $186,509 $563 $574 $585 $597 $609 $621 $634 $646 $659 $673 $1,585 $1,633 $1,682 $1,732 $1,784 $1,837 $1,893 $1,949 $2,008 $2,068 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,901 $30,649 $31,415 $32,201 $33,006 $33,831 $34,677 $35,543 $36,432 $37,343 $896,215 $935,244 $976,072 $1,018,789 $1,063,489 $1,110,263 $1,159,215 $1,210,440 $1,264,058 $1,320,183 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 45 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2022 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax $24,688 $59,008 $86,157 $97,336 $99,283 $101,268 $103,294 $105,360 $107,466 $109,616 Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $24,677 $58,979 $86,116 $97,290 $99,236 $101,221 $103,245 $105,310 $107,417 $109,564 Property Transfer Tax $24,080 $57,553 $69,422 $9,493 $9,684 $9,878 $10,074 $10,277 $10,482 $10,692 Sales Tax - Resident Spending $31,116 $75,339 $111,817 $129,354 $135,245 $141,415 $144,950 $148,575 $152,289 $156,096 Measure S $20,848 $62,531 $95,044 $109,950 $114,958 $120,203 $123,208 $126,288 $137,059 $140,486 Measure C $6,625 $15,334 $21,587 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 Franchise Fees $8,129 $19,027 $27,343 $30,608 $31,067 $31,533 $32,006 $32,486 $32,973 $33,468 Licenses and Permits $627 $1,482 $2,151 $2,432 $2,492 $2,555 $2,619 $2,684 $2,751 $2,820 Fines and Forfeitures $1,837 $4,343 $6,302 $7,124 $7,302 $7,485 $7,672 $7,864 $8,060 $8,262 Vehicle License Fees $137 $324 $470 $532 $545 $558 $572 $587 $601 $616 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $7,797 $18,428 $26,744 $30,233 $30,988 $31,763 $32,557 $33,371 $34,205 $35,061 Miscellaneous Revenue $120 $283 $411 $464 $476 $488 $500 $513 $525 $539 Total Revenues $150,681 $372,631 $533,564 $538,637 $555,097 $572,188 $584,518 $597,136 $617,649 $631,041 II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $91,734 $222,112 $330,203 $382,376 $401,494 $421,569 $442,647 $464,780 $488,019 $512,420 City Council $747 $1,770 $2,574 $2,917 $2,998 $3,080 $3,165 $3,252 $3,341 $3,433 Community Support $54 $126 $182 $205 $209 $213 $217 $221 $226 $230 General Government $5,963 $14,095 $20,455 $23,123 $23,701 $24,294 $24,901 $25,524 $26,162 $26,816 City Clerk $2,220 $5,274 $7,691 $8,736 $8,998 $9,268 $9,546 $9,832 $10,127 $10,431 City Attorney $1,211 $2,848 $4,113 $4,626 $4,719 $4,813 $4,909 $5,008 $5,108 $5,210 Finance $4,941 $11,706 $17,030 $19,298 $19,829 $20,374 $20,935 $21,511 $22,102 $22,710 Community Development $5,535 $13,114 $19,078 $21,619 $22,214 $22,824 $23,452 $24,097 $24,760 $25,441 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$14,878 $35,165 $51,034 $57,690 $59,132 $60,611 $62,126 $63,679 $65,271 $66,903 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $8,796 $20,791 $30,173 $34,109 $34,961 $35,835 $36,731 $37,649 $38,591 $39,555 Fire $20,498 $49,631 $73,784 $85,442 $89,714 $94,200 $98,910 $103,855 $109,048 $114,501 Property Tax Administration $128 $302 $435 $490 $500 $510 $520 $530 $541 $552 Retiree Medical Contribution $328 $778 $1,135 $1,289 $1,327 $1,367 $1,408 $1,450 $1,494 $1,539 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $6,487 $15,333 $22,253 $25,155 $25,784 $26,429 $27,089 $27,766 $28,461 $29,172 Total Expenditures $163,520 $393,045 $580,140 $667,075 $695,580 $725,387 $756,556 $789,154 $823,251 $858,913 III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit)($12,840)($20,414)($46,577)($128,438)($140,483)($153,199)($172,038)($192,018)($205,602)($227,872) Per Unit Per Year ($40)($64)($146)($401)($439)($479)($538)($600)($643)($712) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 0.92 0.95 0.92 0.81 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.76 0.75 0.73 TABLE B-19 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 46 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT HEIRLOOM FARMS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. Public Works - Parks Maintenance Fire Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year Revenues to Expenditure Ratio TABLE B-19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2032 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 $111,809 $114,045 $116,327 $118,653 $121,027 $123,447 $125,915 $128,434 $131,003 $133,622 $111,756 $113,991 $116,271 $118,596 $120,968 $123,388 $125,855 $128,373 $130,940 $133,559 $10,905 $11,123 $11,346 $11,573 $11,804 $12,040 $12,281 $12,527 $12,777 $13,033 $159,998 $163,998 $168,098 $172,301 $176,608 $181,023 $185,549 $190,189 $194,943 $199,816 $143,998 $147,599 $151,289 $155,070 $158,947 $162,921 $166,994 $171,170 $175,448 $179,835 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $23,821 $33,970 $34,479 $34,996 $35,521 $36,054 $36,595 $37,144 $37,701 $38,267 $38,841 $2,890 $2,963 $3,037 $3,113 $3,191 $3,270 $3,352 $3,436 $3,522 $3,610 $8,468 $8,680 $8,897 $9,119 $9,347 $9,581 $9,821 $10,066 $10,318 $10,576 $632 $648 $664 $680 $697 $715 $733 $751 $770 $789 $35,937 $36,836 $37,756 $38,700 $39,668 $40,660 $41,676 $42,718 $43,786 $44,880 $552 $566 $580 $594 $609 $625 $640 $656 $673 $689 $644,736 $658,749 $673,082 $687,741 $702,741 $718,086 $733,781 $749,842 $766,268 $783,071 $538,041 $564,943 $593,190 $622,849 $653,992 $686,692 $721,026 $757,077 $794,931 $834,678 $3,527 $3,624 $3,724 $3,826 $3,932 $4,040 $4,151 $4,265 $4,382 $4,503 $235 $240 $244 $249 $254 $259 $265 $270 $275 $281 $27,486 $28,174 $28,878 $29,600 $30,340 $31,098 $31,876 $32,673 $33,490 $34,327 $10,744 $11,067 $11,399 $11,740 $12,093 $12,455 $12,829 $13,214 $13,610 $14,019 $5,314 $5,420 $5,529 $5,639 $5,752 $5,867 $5,985 $6,104 $6,226 $6,351 $23,334 $23,976 $24,635 $25,313 $26,009 $26,724 $27,459 $28,214 $28,990 $29,787 $26,140 $26,859 $27,598 $28,357 $29,136 $29,938 $30,761 $31,607 $32,476 $33,369 $68,575 $70,290 $72,047 $73,848 $75,694 $77,587 $79,526 $81,514 $83,552 $85,641 $40,544 $41,558 $42,597 $43,662 $44,753 $45,872 $47,019 $48,195 $49,399 $50,634 $120,226 $126,237 $132,549 $139,176 $146,135 $153,442 $161,114 $169,169 $177,628 $186,509 $563 $574 $585 $597 $609 $621 $634 $646 $659 $673 $1,585 $1,633 $1,682 $1,732 $1,784 $1,837 $1,893 $1,949 $2,008 $2,068 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $29,901 $30,649 $31,415 $32,201 $33,006 $33,831 $34,677 $35,543 $36,432 $37,343 $896,215 $935,244 $976,072 $1,018,789 $1,063,489 $1,110,263 $1,159,215 $1,210,440 $1,264,058 $1,320,183 ($251,479)($276,495)($302,990)($331,048)($360,748)($392,177)($425,434)($460,598)($497,790)($537,112) ($786)($864)($947)($1,035)($1,127)($1,226)($1,329)($1,439)($1,556)($1,678) 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.66 0.65 0.63 0.62 0.61 0.59 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Heirloom Farms_Fiscal Impact Analysis_v8_11 30 20;11/30/2020;mdt Page 47 Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA C:\Users\legistar\AppData\Local\Temp\BCL Technologies\easyPDF 8\@BCL@F80EA941\@BCL@F80EA941.doc January 7, 2021 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA18-0661, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes; and PA18-0662, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (3) Self addressed stamped envelopes (2) [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2019070974 Project Title: Heirloom Farms (PA18-0661, PA18-0662) Project Location: Southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road Project Description: Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on January 6, 2021 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the SEIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the SEIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the SEIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the SEIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the SEIR. This is to certify that the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) that was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 for the Harveston Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: MLC Holdings Inc. Project Title: Heirloom Farms (PA18-0661, PA18-0662) Location: Southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road Project Description: Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots 2. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measur e or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 321 unit single family residential community and tentative tract map for 111 single family lots, 31 condominium lots, and 9 open space lots is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Director of Community Development Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA18-0661, PA18-0662 APPLICANT: MLC Holdings, Inc PROPOSAL: A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 321 unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 37509) for the creation of 111 single family residential lots, 31 condominium lots and 9 open space lots. The project is located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) and Section 15162 ( Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Sections exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 DATE OF HEARING: January 6, 2021 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM PLACE OF HEARING: This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber. The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission meeting. Due to the closure of the library and other city buildings and facilities due to the COVID -19 pandemic, the agenda packet is only viewable on the City’s website at https://temeculaca.legistar.com/Calendar. To view the proposed project application or questions concerning the project, please contact Scott Cooper (951) 506-5137. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the January 6, 2021 Planning Commission meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the Planning Manager. Email comments must be submitted to the Planning Manager at stuart.fisk@TemeculaCA.gov. Electronic comments on agenda items for the January 6, 2021 Planning Commission meeting may only be submitted via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Planning Manager shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Planning Commission may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Planning Commission meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the record of the Planning Commission meeting. Questions? Please call the Case Planner, Scott Cooper at (951) 506-5137 or the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.