HomeMy WebLinkAbout032504 PTS Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk at (909)694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting wili enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR35.1 02.35.1 04 ADA Title IIJ
AGENDA
TEIilECULA PUBLlCrrRAFFIC SAFETY COMMISSION
TO BE HELD AT
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California
Thursday, March 25, 2004 at 6:00 P,M.
CALL TO ORDER:
FLAG SALUTE
ROLL CALL:
COMMISSIONERS: Jacobs, Katan, Lanier, Ramos, Connerton
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Commission on items
that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to
speak to the Commission about an item not listed on the Agenda, a yellow "Request to Speak"
form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Recording Secretary
before the Commission gets to that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual
speakers.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by
one vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Publicrrraffic Safety
Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
COMMENSION REPORTS
Reports by the Commissioners on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not
to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
COMMISSION CONSENT CALENDAR
1.
Minutes of Febnlarv 26. 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Continued to the meeting of April 22, 2004
,,'tcaffic'comm;ssn'agendaI20041032504 Agendalajp
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2.
3.
3.1
4.
Citizen Services Award Proaram
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
That the Publicrrraffic Safety Commission consider staff's recommendation for the
creation of a Citizen Service Award Program to communicate the City and
Commission's appreciation for exemplary service, by recognizing citizens who make
significant contributions to make Temecula one of the best cities to live in.
Implementationl of Geoaraphic Information Systems (GIS)/Global Positionina System
(GPS) in Police Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Publicrrraffic Safety Commission review the presentation and support for
the implE>mentation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS/Global Positioning
System (GPS) in Police Vehicles.
Safety Review -. State Route 79 South and Wabash Lane
RECOMMENDA nON:
4.1
5.
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission review the intersection of State Route 79
South and Wabash Lane for possible safety issues and determine if a traffic signal
should bE> considered.
Multi-Way Stop Sians - Meadows Parkway and Royal Oaks Drive
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1
6.
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a
resolution establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Meadows Parkway
and Royal Oaks Drive.
Pedestrian Walkway - Loma Linda Road east of Pechanaa Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1
7.
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission review this item and provide a
recommendation.
Traffic Engineer's Report
8.
Police Chiefs Røport
9.
Fire Chiefs ReplJrt
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City of Temecula PublicfTraffic Safety Commission will be held on
Thursday, April 22, 2004 at 6:00 P.M., Temecula City Hall, Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
"'traffic'commlssn'agendaI20041032504 Agendalajp
ITEM NO.1
MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 26, 2004
CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF
APRIL 22, 2004
ITEM NO.2
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Publicrrraffic Safety Comrnission
FROM:
Denise Lanier, Human Resources Analyst
DATE:
March 25, 2004
SUBJECT:
Item 2
Citizen Service Award Program
RECOMMENDATION:
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission consider staff's recommendation for the creation of a
Citizen Service Award Program to communicate the City and Commission's appreciation for
exemplary service, by recognizing citizens who make significant contributions to make Temecula
one of the best cities to live in.
BACKGROUND:
At the January, 2004 meeting of the Public\Traffic Safety Commission, City staff was directed to
develop a formal citizen service award program. Commissioners provided staff with concepts and
ideas that the Commission wanted to see included in the citizen service award program effort.
The Citizen Service Award Program was designed to recognize and award local citizens for
exceptional service to their community.
The Public Safetyrrraffic Commission would be the liaison between the City of Temecula staff to
determine and recognizE> Program recipients. Awards would need to be in writing and include the
following facts:
Explain, specifically, what the citizen would be awarded for.
Distinguished Service Certificate
Major, exceptional perscnal effort
Excel/enl=e Certificate
Exceptional Achievement above and beyond
Meritorious Certificate
Acts of heroism performed at great personal risk.
The award will explain what made the citizen's actions stand out. The City Staff will decide upon
awards.
The Public Safetyrrraffic Commission Chairman and the City of Temecula Mayor will then sign the
certificate. Award recipients would be presented with a Certificate of Appreciation at a Public
Safety/Traffic Commissic,n meeting along with the reading of the actual act of service achievement.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Not available at this time.
1
R"TRAFFtC,COMMISSIONIAGENDAIWO41032504ICiû"n S",;ce Aw"d P.-ogmn - Tea!fi, Commission.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CITIZEN SERVICE A WARD PROGRAM
Believing that the citizens of Temecula are one of its most valuable assets makes the City and the
Public Traffic/Safety Commission are proud to have developed a program to recognize their
contributions to the community.
This program is intended to communicate the City and Commission's appreciation, for exemplary
service, by recognizing those individuals who maintain high standards and make significant
contributions to Temecula. The Program is designed to recognize citizens who make exceptional
effort for the betterment of the community.
PROGRAM GOALS:
The Citizen Service Award Program is designed to recognize and award local citizens for
exceptional community involvement. The objectives of the program are:
x
to develop a procedure to officially recognize and honor citizens, who have performed
distinctive acts 01" services for their community who are worthy of recognition.
x
to involve citizens in continuous improvement of City as a whole by recognizing excellent
work;
x
to promote innov3tion,
x
to promote team spirit and unity of purpose, within the City, based on shared achieyements;
Who is eligible?
All residents of Temecula are eligible.
Eligibility Guidelines fo,r Public Safety Commendation Awards:
x
Demonstration of a high level of service to and concern for the needs of the public.
x
Contribution above and beyond that of other residents throughout the City.
x
Application of an exceptional skill or talent.
x
Assumption of a leadership role (consistently sacrificing personal output to assist fellow
residents).
x
Acts on improvin!) relations between the public, other agencies, governmental bodies or
community groups.
",\TRAFFICICOMMISSIONIAGENDA\2004\O'2504\CO",",,"d'tio" P,bH, S'lely Awarn P,og"m - Citi'e'.do,
x
Outstanding performance or courageous manner, above and beyond the call of duty, during
an emergency situation.
x
Makes a substantial contribution to Temecula, which enhances the City.
The Selection Committee
The PublicfTraffic Safety Commission will be the liaison with City of Temecula staff. Award
information must be brought to a designated City Staff member. The City Staff will decide upon the
awards. Awards will need to be in writing and include the following facts:
x
Explain, specifically, what the citizen is being awarded for.
Distinguished Service Certificate
Major, exceptional personal effort
Excellence Cen'ificate
Exceptional Achievement above and beyond
Meritorious Certificate
Acts of heroism performed at great personal risk.
x
Explain what ma:kes the citizen stand alone
x
Explain what he/she does, beyond expectations
x
What you personally have seen him/her do that is noteworthy
(Explain the nominee's actions in detail and the positive results a/those actions.)
Each award will be defined at the appropriate level with a certificate created to read: This
"Distinguished ServiCE! Award" is given to a deserving citizen of the City of Temecula who
has demonstrated exceptional achievement above and beyond. The Public Traffic/Safety
Commission Chairman and the City of Temecula Mayor will sign the certificate. Award recipients will
then be presented with éI Certificate of Appreciation at the next Public Traffic/Safety Commission
meeting along with the reading of the actual act of service achievement.
R"TRAFFlC,COMMISSIONIAGENOA\20041032504IComme"da,loo P"bllo S""y A~,' P,ogcom. CIII,,".,oo
ITEM NO.3
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
PublicfTraffic Safety Commission
FROM:
Tim Thorson, Director of Information Systems
DATE:
March 25, 2004
SUBJECT:
It'~m3
Implementation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)/Global Positioning
System (GPS) in Police Vehicles
RECOMMENDATION:
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission review the presentation and support for the
implementation of Geographic Information Systems (GIS)/Global Positioning System (GPS) in Police
Vehicles.
BACKGROUND:
At the City Council meeting of January 13, 2004 Councilman Jeff Stone noted the benefits of having
GIS/GPS in Fire vehicles. Coucilman Jeff Stone further recommended that City staff examine the
feasibility of installing a digital map capability in Police Department vehicles. The full City Council
concurred with this recommendation, and the following information has been prepared in
accordance with City Council direction.
In February 2000, the Mayor of the CityofTemecula, after having gone on a "ride along"with one of
the City's fire units, directed staff to explore ways to enhance the response capabilities of its fire
response units through the automation of the department's routing procedures by utilizing GPS
technology and the City's GIS capabilities and data sources. At that time, current procedures
involved the use of hard copy books with street maps and pre-plan/floor plan information.
Responding units are dispatched from the Emergency Command Center by way of radio
communication. After re<:eiving the address from dispatch, responding units determine the location
route to the incident on the way to the incident using the hardcopy map books. If the location of the
emergency is within an area containing a special area map or if the site of the incident has a pre-
plan/floor plan, these documents would also be accessed using hard copy books. The City of
Temecula, like many of the other medium sized cities within Riverside County has a fire protective
services contract with thH County. Riverside County in turn contracts with the State of California
Department of Forestry (CDF) for fire protection services countywide.
ExistinQ GIS/GPS TechnoloQY in Fire Vehicles
The ultimate solution which met all the objectives established by the City resulted in the installation
of Plant Equipment's Orion MapMobi/e software on Fujitsu 3500 Pen Tablets. The tablets are
mounted in all of the City'~¡ front line emergency fire response units with Gamber/Johnson mounting
bracket hardware. All units have been equipped with mobile computers with mapping and GPS
referencing capabilities and the ability to access pre-plan/floor plan images stored within the
computer.
"1I<affi,'mmmismlagenda\20041032504IIS P,e.,nlation Tim Thocsonlajp
Specifically the program provides all units with the ability of find the location of an emergency
incident and routing that unit to the location of the incident. The location to an incident can be
identified by asking the system to find an intersection, typing in an address, or by selecting the
desired area and zooming into it. The system provides a map and written directions indicating the
route to the incident and an icon displaying the current GPS location of the responding unit. To find
the location the system first searches the parcel database, and if it is unable to find a match the
street centerline data with its address range field is searched to find the location.
The mapping component of the program utilizes baseline GIS data including street centerline,
parcel, fire hydrant, city limits, schools, parks, public facilities, public safety facilities and commercial
centers. The parcel data provides the exact location of the incident and hydrant information allows
the responding unit to ascertain the side of the street and direction that the equipment should be on.
The other layers provide additional information to assist in referencing the incident and identifying
potentially sensitive loca,tions.
DISCUSSION:
In order to capture the b'3nefits and lessons learned from the Temecula Fire Department, a Police
Department Pilot Evalua,tion is recommended by City Staff. The following goals are proposed for
this pilot eyaluation:
.
Deploy Plant Equipment's Orion MapMobi/e software in two designated police yehicles.
Utilize/develop baseline map data that are accurate and easily updateable.
Utilize hardware in the form of a stand alone tablet PC, which will be mounted on the
designated vehicles.
Determine ways to coordinate with the County Sheriff to integrate this capability into existing
onboard Mobile Data Computer (MDC).
Utilize/develop a program that integrates GPS technology.
.
.
Standalone Tablet PC's are recommended for this Pilot due to the ongoing integration issues with
existing County Sheriff MDC's. . The long term goal oft his program is to integrate G IS/GPS
technology with existing onboard County MDCs. This Pilot Evaluation should last for approximately
6 months after which timH a complete report will be provided to the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission
and the City Council with recommendations for deployment of the next phase of this capability.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
Cost Breakdown by item
""<affi,"ommi"nl'g,nda\2004I032504\1S P""'nt'ltion Tim Tho,"onlajp
4.
Attachment A
Price Cost Breakdown of GIS Pilot Svstems
1.
Tablet PC:
a) Two (2) liP TCI000 Tablet PC's
& Accessories
b) Two (2) ACmC Power Adapters
2.
Plant Equipment MapMobile License Fee
a) Two (2) Orion License Keys
3.
Gamber Johnson Vehicular Integration:
a) Two (2) Clamp
b) Systems Integration Labor
GPS:
a) Two (2) Trimble
b) Miscellaneous Cables, Connectors & HIW
Pilot Project TOTAL:
Unit Price Total Price
$2,330.00 $4,660.00
$130.00 $260.00
$165.00
$500.00
$500.00
$350.00
$150.00
$330.00
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
$700.00
$300.00
$8,256.00
ITEM NO.4
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer - Traffic
DATE:
March 25, 2004
SUBJECT:
Itt~m4
Safety Review - State Route 79 South and Wabash Lane
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review the intersection of State Route 79 South and
Wabash Lane for possible safety issues and determine if a traffic signal should be considered.
BACKGROUND:
Staff was directed by Councilman Washington to review the intersection of State Route 79 South
and Wabash Lane to ens,ure safe access for vehicular traffic to and from Wabash Lane. The public
has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the
agenda notification proc'~ss and by mail.
State Route 79 South is c:lassified as an eight (8) lane Urban Arterial Highway on the City's General
Plan Circulation Element with four travel lanes in each direction and a raised median. Currently,
State Route 79 South is striped for three (3) travel lanes in each direction and a painted median.
The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on State Route 79 South is approximately 48,000 between
Interstate 15 and Pechanga Parkway. The speed limit is posted at 55 MPH on State Route 79
South.
Wabash Lane is a 50 foot wide residential street which functions as a residential collector roadway
providing access to State Route 79 South. The ADT on Wabash Lane is approximately 1,100 south
of State Route 79 South. The prima facie speed limit is 25 MPH on Wabash Lane.
A review of the accident history for the period from January 1, 2001 to February 29,2004, indicates
that there were no report'3d collisions at the intersection during this thirty-eight (38) month period.
In order to evaluate the need for traffic signal controls, entering vehicular volume data and accident
history was reviewed for the intersection. This data along with an evaluation of other roadway
conditions was used to p'3rform a Traffic Signal Warrants analysis.
The guidelines for the installation of a traffic signal are based on an intersection satisfying of one (1)
or more of the eleven (11) basic warrants identified in the Caltrans Traffic Manual. Those warrants
are identified in Exhibit "B".
c Itcaffi cleo m miss n lag end a 12004 103251 wa bashan d Sf 791 a j p
The traffic signal warrant analysis performed for the intersection of State Route 79 South and
Wabash Lane indicates that none of the warrants are satisfied and traffic signals are not justified at
this location. Moreover, with the anticipated traffic volumes of 85,000 vehicles per day on State
Route 79 South between Interstate 15 and Pechanga Parkway, installation of additional traffic
signals along this segment would adversely impact the operation of this major corridor.
It should be noted that State Route 79 South is a State Highway and falls under the jurisdiction of
Caltrans. Therefore, any plans for the addition of traffic controls along this route must be reviewed
and approved by Caltr-3ns. Based on our past experience, Caltrans would not approve the
installation of a traffic si~lnal at this location unless their traffic signal warrant guidelines support the
installation.
Currently, the City is in tile process of preparing plans for the installation of a raised median island
on State Route 79 South from Interstate 15 to Butterfield Stage Road. The plans will include a
traffic signal modification to allow "U" turns at the intersection of State Route 79 South and
Pechanga Parkway. During peak hours, this signal modification will allow Califomia Sunset
residents to make a right-turn onto State Route 79 South, proceed east and safely execute a "U"
turn at the intersection of State Route 79 South and Pechanga Parkway and then proceed west on
State Route 79 South.
Along with these improvements, the City is in the process of soliciting bids for the construction of
sidewalk and landscaping improvements along the south side of State Route 79 South. It is
anticipated that the improvements will be completed within four (4) months.
Staff recommends that the Commission support current plans to construct a median with
uncontrolled left-turn access at Wabash Lane, the proposed traffic signal modification to allow "U"
turns at State Route 7'9 South and Pechanga Parkway, and the sidewalk and landscape
improvements along the south side of State Route 79 South.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "8" - Traffic Signal Warrants
c Itcaffi cleo m m ¡ son lagend a 12004 103251 wa bashan d sr 79/ a j p
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
~
EXHIBIT "B"
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
MajorStreet STATEROUTE79
Minor Street WABASH LANE
Cnlical sP""" of major streettcaffie is >40 MPH...
Cnlical Approach Speed 60 MPH
Critical Approach Speed 25 MPH
c:::o
or ) RURAl
c::::=J
In b,ilt 'p area of isolated eomm"ity of' 10.000 pop...
c::::=J URBAN
MINIMUM REQUIREIAENTS
80% SHOWN IN BRACKETS)
U I R U R
APPROACH
lANES 1 "or more 6-7 AM 7-8 AM 6-9 AM 2-3 PM 3-4 PM 4-5 PM 5-6 PM 6-7 PM
Both Approaohes (~~ I 525 (~~¡\ I=~~¡ 1611 I
Ma'orStreet 420\ 1664 1966 1662 1735 1971 2038 1962
Hig,,"st Approach ~~\ I~{¡k (~~~ I (~) I
Minor Street 29 40 54 60 76 60 40 32
WARRANT 1 - Minim'm Vehicular Vol",""
MINIMUM REQUIRE "ENTS
60% SHOWN IN BR.<.CKETS
U R U R
APPROACH
LANES
Both Approaches
Ma'orStr..t
HighestApproaeh
Minor Street
6-7 AM
7-8 AM
6-9 AM
500
400
150
120
1684
1966
29
40
NOTE, Hea,ierleft-t,rn mo,"mentfrom MajorS"eet inol,ded when LT phasing is proposed...
WARRANT 2 -Inlerr,pllnn of Continunus Traffie
NOTE, Hea,i" left-,"m mo'ement 'om Major St-eet inel,ded when L T ph.,ing is propo."d...
WARRANT 3 . Minimum Pedestrian Vol,me
REQUIRE"ENT
Pedeslnan ,ol,me crossing the majors"eet is 100", more for each of any fo"ho"" oris 190 or
more d"in an one ho", and
There are less than 60 gaps per ho" in the Major Stmet tcaffie stream of ade"ate length lor
es"ians to croSs a""
Thenearesttreffiesi nelalon thaMa'orStreetis r<ater than 300 feet: and
The new "affic si nalwilinotseno",1 disru t ro re,¡si,e tcaffie flow on the Ma'orStreet
WARRANT 4 - School Crossings
100% SATISFIED
60% SATISFIED
YES ~
YES c:::::::J
NO c:::o
NO c:::::K:::J
1662
2-3 PM 3-4 PM 4-5 PM 5"PM 6-7 PM Ho"
1735 1971 2036 1982 1811
60 76 60 40 32
c:::o
54
100% SATISFIED
80% SATISFIED
YES c::::=J
YES L...=:J
NO c:::::K:::J
NO c:::::K:::J
Ho"
c:::o
100% SATISFIED
YES c::::=J
N 0 c:::o
FULFILLED
YES
YES
YES
Not Applicable.................................
See School Crossings Warrant Sheet..
~
WARRANT 5 - P>'O9ressive Movement
MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS DISTANCE TO NEAREST SIGNAL
> 1000 FEET N NA It S NA ft. E1300ft. W 990ft.
On one-way isolated streets or streets with one-way traffic signifanee and adjacent signals
are so far a art that neeessa latoonin aoos seed eontrol wo,ld be lost
On 2-way streets where adjacent signals do not pro,"e neeessa'Y platooning a"" sP"""
eontrol: ro osed si nals eo,ld eonstiMe a ro ressi,~ si nal s stem
SATISFIED
YES c::::=J
NO c:::o
YES
The satisfaction of a warrant is not necessarily j'stifie"lion lor a signal. Delay. congestion. eonfusion or other e,idenee of the ""ed for
nght-of-way assignment m",t be shown.
YES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS
WARRANT. . Accident Experience
SATISFIED
YES c::==J
NO c:::::K:J
0 red"ce accident fre "enc
correction & 'n,ol,' In" or $500 dama e
NUMBER OF ACCIDENTS
0
WARRANT 7 - Systems Wa.rant
SATISFIED
MINIMUM VOLUME
REQUIREMENTS
ENTERING VOLUME - ALL APPROACHES
D"ring Typical Weekday Peak Ho", 2098 ,ehlhr
or D",lng Each of Any 5 Ho"" of a Sat",dayand/or
Sonda "hlhr
CHARACTERISTICS OF MAJ Moor St.
HI hwa S ,tern ,eNln a, a Prinel Ie Netwo'" tcaffio X
R"cal orS"b",ban HI hwa o<rtsideof,enterin .or aCI X
A earn as a Moor Rolrte on an Official Plan X
ANY MAJOR ROUTE CHARAC"RISTIC MET BOTH STREETS
II
r-x1
YES c::==J
NO c:::::K:J
FULFILLED
> 800 VEHIHR
YES
WARRANT 8. Combination ofWa.rants
SATISFIED
REQUIREMENT
TWO WARRANTS
SATISFIED 80%
WARRANT
Warrant 1 - Minl"'"m Vehl,,"lar Vol"me or
Warrant2-lntern¡ tionofContln"o"sTraffic
WARRANT 0 . Fo", Ho", Volume
SATISFIED
A roach Lane,
BothA roache,-MaorStreet
HI he" roaches-Minor Street
20r
More
X
One
X
. Referto Flg",eO'" (Urban Area,) or Flg",eO-7 (Rural Areas) to determine ifthl,warrnnt " ,atlsfied.
WARRANT 10 - Peak Ho", Delay SATISFIED
(ALL PARTS MUS'" BE SATISFIED)
,. The total delay experienced for traffic on one ml"" street approach controlled by a STOP sign eq"als or
exceed, fo", ,ehlcle ho"" of a one lane approach and fi" ,ehlcle ho"" for a two lane approach; AND
2. The "I"me on the same minor ,treet approach equal, or exceeds 100 'ph for one mo,'ng lane and
150 'ph for two mO"ng lane" AND
3. The total entering "'"me seNloed d",ing the ho", eq"al, or exceed, 800 'ph for Inte"ectlons with fo", or
more approaches or 650 ,ph tor Inte"ectlons with three approaChe'.
WARRANT 11 . Peak Hour Volume
SATISFIED
A ro"h Lanes
Both A roache, - Moor SOeet
HI hestA ro"he,-MlnorStreet
20r
More
X
On"
X
. Referto Flg",e9'" (Urban Areas) orFlg"re 9-7 (Rural Area,) to determine Ifthl,warrant Is satisfied.
YES c::==J
NO c:::::K:J
YES c::==J
NO c:::::K:J
YES c::==J NO c:::::K:J
YES c::==J NO c:::::K:J
YES c::==J NO c:::::K:J
YES c:::::K:J NO c::==J
YES c::==J NO c:::::K:J
The ,"",faction of a warrant Is not neceasarlly j"stlfi,:atlon for a "goal. Delay. conge"'on. confusion or other ""ence ofthe need for
right-of-way a'slgnment m"" be ,hown.
ITEM NO.5
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
PublicfTraffic Safety Commission
~Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer - Traffic
March 25, 2004
DATE:
SUBJECT:
It'~m 5
Multi-Way Stop Signs - Meadows Parkway and Royal Oaks Drive
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission recommend that the City Council adopt a resolution
establishing Multi-Way Stop signs at the intersection of Meadows Parkway and Royal Oaks Drive.
BACKGROUND:
The City received a request to review the sight distance for vehicles turning left from Royal Oaks
Drive onto Meadows Parkway and for students on bicycles crossing Meadows Parkway. The public
has been notified of the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue through the
agenda notification process and by mail.
Meadows Parkway is classified as a 76 foot wide four (4) lane Major Highway on the City's General
Plan Circulation Element with two travel lanes in each direction, a raised median and a bike lane in
each direction. The Ave¡-age Daily Traffic (ADT) on Meadows Parkway is approximately 4,800 south
of La Serena Way. The speed limit is posted at 45 MPH on Meadows Parkway.
Royal Oaks Drive is a 40 foot wide residential street with one travel lane in each direction. The
prima facie speed limit i!; 25 MPH on Royal Oaks Drive.
A review of the accident history for the twenty-four (24) month period from January 1, 2002 to
December31, 2003, indicates that there was only one (1) collision atthis intersection. This collision
however, was a left-turn collision and was not attributed to sight distance.
The Caltrans Traffic Manual indicates that the multi-way stop signs may be useful at locations where
the volume of traffic on intersecting roads is approximately equal and/or where a combination of high
speed, restricted sight distance and an accident history indicates that assignment of right-of-way is
necessary. Multi-way stop signs should not be used for controlling vehicular speed. There are
three (3) criteria that Caltrans has established for the evaluation of Multi-Way Stop signs. These
criteria are as follows:
1.
Where signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multi-way stop may be an interim
measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made
for the signal installations. .
", ua fficlcom m i ssn lagan da 12004103251 wa ba s hands' 791 a j p
2.
An accident problem, as indicated by five (5) or more reported accidents within a twelve
(12) month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multi-way stop installation. Such
accidents include right and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
3.
Minimum Traffic: Volumes
a.
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from a II approaches must
average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any eight (8) hours of an average day,
and
b.
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or highway
must average at least 200 units per hour for the same eight (8) hours, with an
average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle
during the maximum hour, but
When the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 40
miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70 percent of the above
requirements.
c.
The Multi-Way Stop warrant analysis performed for the intersection indicates that the existing
volumes are considerably lower than the applicable warrant criteria. Based on the volume warrant
criteria multi-way stop controls are not justified at Meadows Parkway and Royal Oaks Drive.
A review of the prevailin£ speed data on Meadows Parkway indicates that the 85th percentile speed
is 50 MPH in the vicinity of the Royal Oaks Drive intersection.
An evaluation of the intersection's sight distance indicates that the visibility from Royal Oaks Drive
looking north was unobBtructed. However, the sight distance visibility looking south from Royal
Oaks Drive falls below the minimum stopping sight distance for a 52 MPH speed due to the vertical
alignment of the roadway. A sight distance of approximately 500 feet is required for a prevailing
speed of 52 MPH. The ¡¡valuation determined that the sight distance visibility does not meet the
minimum requirement.
The warrant analysis ind.ìcates that multi-way stop controls are not justified at this location based on
volume and accident history. However, the Caltrans Traffic Manual states that multi-way stop
controls may be considered at intersections where the sight distance cannot be improved by
remoYing the obstruction. Although it is likely that the installation of the stop sign will increase noise
levels due to vehicular acceleration and deceleration, staff recommends the installation of multi-way
stop signs at this location based on the lack of sufficient sight distance and visibility.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Funds are available for the installation of signs and associated pavement markings in the Public
Works Routine Street Maintenance Account.
Attachment:
1.
2.
Exhibit "A" - Location Map
Exhibit "B" - Multi-Way Stop Warrant Analysis
r: Itcaffi cleo m m j ssn \agenda 12004 10 3251 wabash and s r 79/ a j p
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
- -.-. ---.--
EXHIBIT "B"
MULTI-WAY STOP WARRANT ANALYSIS
l1ulti-Way Stop Warranting Software
03/09/04
100% 70% COMBINATION
START NB SB EB WB HOUR WARRANT WARRANT WARRANT
TIME TOT MET MET MET
0:00 29 30 7 0 66
1:00 16 13 1 0 30
2:00 13 4 0 0 17
3:00 5 26 2 0 33
4:00 6 70 2 0 78
5:00 34 110 5 0 149
6:00 81 182 10 0 273
7:00 206 454 15 0 675 * *
8:00 169 292 54 0 515 * *
9:00 155 305 17 0 477 *
10:00 189 278 15 0 482 *
11:00 221 278 14 0 513 * *
12:00 182 244 19 0 445 *
13: 00 289 276 27 0 592 * *
14:00 201 212 26 0 439 *
15:00 228 241 26 0 495 * *
16:00 252 235 19 0 506 * *
17:00 277 266 31 0 574 * *
18:00 225 241 18 0 484 * *
19:00 207 161 14 0 382 *
20:00 161 130 11 0 302
21:00 114 104 10 0 228
22:00 78 70 8 0 156
23:00 41 30 6 0 77
Nulti-Way Stop Warranting Software
03/09/04
Major Street: Meadows Parkway
Minor Street: Royal Oaks Drive
Date of Analysis: 03/09/04
Name of Analyst:
Case Number:
Comments:
85th% Speed of Major Street: 52
WARRANT ANALYSIS SUMMARY:
WARRANT 1 - Accident Experience
NOT SATISFIED - The accident warrant of 5 or more reportable accidents
of a correctable type is not met with 1 accidents over a 12 month period.
WARRANT 2 - Miniwlm Traffic Volumes
SATISFIED - The 100% vehicular warrant of 500 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is met with 8 hours meeting the warrant.
SATISFIED - The 70% vehicular warrant of 350 entering vehicles for
any 8 hours of the day is met with 13 hours meeting the warrant.
~ WARRANT 3 - Vehicular & pedestrian Traffic from Minor Road
NOT SATISFIED - The combined total of 200 vehicles and pedestrians
from the minor approach is not met with 0 hours meeting the warrant.
ITEM NO.6
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
Ifj Ali Moghadam, P.E., Principal Engineer - Traffic
DATE:
March 25, 2004
SUBJECT:
Itl~m6
P."destrian Walkway - Lama Linda Road east of Pechanga Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review this item and provide a recommendation.
BACKGROUND:
Staff was directed by CoJncilman Washington to have the Public/Traffic Safety Commission review
the issue of pedestrian access along Lama Linda Road between Pechanga Parkway and Erie
Stanley Gardner Middle :School (located at Via Del Coronado), and provide a recommendation. The
public has been notified of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission's consideration of this issue
through the agenda noWication process and by mail.
Lama Linda Road is identified as a 56 foot wide Principal Collector roadway on the Wolf Creek
Specific Plan providing access to Pechanga Parkway from the Redhawk and Wolf Creek
subdivisions. The Wolf Creek development has been conditioned to provide street improvements
between Pechanga Parkway and Via Del Coronado. The street improvements will provide for one
travel lane in each direction, a painted median, a striped bike lane in each direction and curb, gutter
and sidewalk improvements on the south side of Lama Linda Road.
Currently, Lama Linda Road is a two lane 26 foot wide roadway between Pechanga Parkway and
Via Del Coronado. Thefe are existing school area signs on Lama Linda Road adjacent to the
middle school that reduce the speed limit to 25 MPH "When Children are Present" and a crosswalk
with an adult crossing guard at the intersection of Lama Linda Road and Via Del Coronado.
When the Encroachment Permit was issued to the developer for grading on the project site, a
condition was placed on the permit that requires the developer's contractor to maintain pedestrian
access during construction. Initially, the contractor provided pedestrian access along the dirt
shoulder located on the south side of Lama Linda Road. Along with the temporary access, the City
constructed a concrete sidewalk on the narrow bridge deck to provide a separation between
pedestrian and vehicular traffic.
Recently, the developer was required to place a gravel path on the north side of Lama Linda Road
to provide pedestrian access around the construction site, and provide adult crossing guards to
assist school age pedestrians across Loma Linda Road just east of Pechanga Parkway and in front
of the middle school.
"ltcaffi cleo m m issn lagend a 12004 \032511 0 mal ¡ n daand pecha ngal a j p
In addition to the tempol'ary improvements, the Temecula Valley Unified School District informed
staff that they are providing temporary busing for students that live on the west side of Pechanga
Parkway to minimize pedestrian activity along Lama Linda Road during the construction.
The City is in the process of installing a temporary double yellow center line and white edge lines
along Loma Linda Road between Pechanga Parkway and Redwood Road, west of the middle
school, to define the travel way and to provide traffic calming during the construction. Also, during a
recent plan approval, the City required the contractor to repair and improve the pedestrian path
along Lama Linda Road.
Since the developer has agreed to complete the required improvements during the school's summer
break, any additional improvements that the Commission may want to recommend must be
temporary and of a type that can be implemented quickly.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None
Attachment:
1. Exhibit "A" - Location Map
2. Exhibit "B" - Pedestrian Path Details
"ltraffi cleo m m ; ssn lagen da 120 0410325\1 om a I i n d aa n d pechangal a j p
EXHIBIT "A"
LOCATION MAP
EXHIBIT "B"
PEDESTRIAN PATH DETAILS
~ 1J~r-
,I
, I
I~
....,~ ,~I
þc, ,., ;¡ .: '- I :::¡ I
~~ : I
) I
, I t
I I
I~
~ I~I
~ I
I
\
\
1
\
\ &""
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ '\
\
I
I
~'d _I
tt'9NVIt'J.:?d .-
~
~
~
~
t I
! I
~ II~ ~
i "'- f I~
\!t ~
~~ ()' I~I
~ ~ ' I
~\b I '-
I - ð1VQ Ò'
/-
{ -
I <{ °"<hto9y
I~ /
I ~ / .
I ~j
I § I
1 I
í /
I ,1
'/
-, j I
--r-
II ' l
,I \
, I
, I
I
\ 1
«
I
«
z
0
.-
u
w
(J)
À
~
~
,¡
.
I")
ITEM NO.7
TRAFFIC ENGINEER'S REPORT
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
City Manager/City Council
FROM:
Williarn G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE:
March 23, 2004
SUBJECT:
Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of
Public Works' Monthly AGtivity Reports for the month of February, 2004.
MOACTRPT
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
MEMORANDUM
Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
IJ~Brad Buron, Maintenance Superintendent
March 2, 2004
Monthly ActÌ\'Ìty Report. February, 2004
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel
for the month of February, 201~4:
I. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced
B. Total signs installed
C. Total signs repaired
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
---42
----'!
--1J
TREES
A.
Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns
-.n
ASPHALT REPAIRS
A.
B.
Total square feet of A. C. repairs
Total Tons
3.189
~
CATCH BASINS
A.
Total catch basins cleaned
~
RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A.
Total square footage for right-of-way abatement
--'!
GRAFFITI REMOV AL
A.
B.
Total locations
----!Q
~
Total S.F.
STENCILING
A. ---.!. New and repainted legends
B. -2Q L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to ~ service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming,
sign repair, A.c. failures, litter r~moval, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to -2!L service order requests
for the month of Januarv.2004.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in ---2L hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and
response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of Februarv. 2004 was $22.128.10
compared to $20.513.85 for the month of Januarv . 2004.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
Account No. 999-5402
$ 14,338.00
$ 7,790.20
$ -0-
cc:
Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer (CIPrrraffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer (Capital Improvements)
Jell)' Alegria, Senior Engineer (Land Development)
R,IMAINT AlNIMOAcrRP1\21lO3-2004\
DATE
02/09/04
02/09/04
02/09/04
02/09/04
02/1 0/04
02/1l/04
02/17/04
02/23/04
02/27/04
02/28/04
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF FEBRUARY, 2004
L0CAnON
.'
" ..
w.0~"t¡r0~IJEmFJø
6TH STREET AT FRONT STREET
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
27710 JEFFERSON
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
LAS HACIENDAS AT JEFFERSON
27720 JEFFERSON
TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
RANCHO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
SANTIAGO BRIDGE
GOLDS GYM 1-15 FWY
GOLDS GYM
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
REMOVED
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED
TOTAL LOCATIONS
----2M
---.!J!
710
S.F. OFGRAFFITI
5 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
6 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
II
S.F. OF GRAFFITI
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
30 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
98 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
64 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
R,IMAINTMN>WKCM" meo."",,", M'='" 'AOY M
COSTS
January
February
H___"
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
SQUARE
FOOTAGE
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
$ 2,765.00
$ 1,687.00
1,580
964
CITY OF TEMECULA
2004 GRAFFITI REM 0 V AL
II_~_~ -- - ~
lUlAL CALLS
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
20
10
Totals for the Year
To Date: March 1,2004
Sq. Foot
Cost
Calls
2,544
$ 4,452.00
30
:::: l-- ------ .-. --. . h
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
..--.
-
JAN
FEB MAR APR MAY JUNE JULY AUG SEPT OCT NOY DEC
-- COST -- sa FT
R""'",A>MGR~RAR'TIK><ART_"'.,
ITEM NO.8
POLICE CHIEF'S REPORT
APPROV AL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
FROM:
City Manager/City Council
Jim Domenoe, Chief of POli&J
March 23, 2004
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during February 2004. The Police Department responded to 41 "priority one" calls for service during
the month of February, with an average response time of approximately 5.3 minutes. A total of
3,940 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month.
During February, the TBmecula Police Department's Town Center Storefront served a total of 98
customers. Twenty-eight sets of fingerprints were taken, 27 people filed police reports and nine
people had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of
special events, neighborhood watch and community-oriented programs during the month. He also
coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs and conducted police station tours. Additionally, he
continued to provide residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up.
Officer Fanene also continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site
plans/conditions.
During February, the POP Teams continued their problem oriented policing approach of areas within
the community and made numerous arrests, including seven felony arrests and one misdemeanor
arrest for various crimes. The function of the POP Teams is to address situations that typically
require extended enfon:ement action or certain expertise in order to solye an on-going problem
within a neighborhood. During the month of February, Corporal Quinata and Officer Pierson were
rotated back to patrol, and Officers Michael Littleton and Richard Donoho assumed their places on
the team.
The traffic team reported that during the month of February there were 938 citations issued for
hazardous Yiolations, 114 citations were issued for non-hazardous violations and 148 parking
citations were issued. During the month there were three fatal collisions, nine injury traffic collisions,
31 non-injury collisions were reported and 25 drivers were arrested for DUI. In other citation
summary infonmation, the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program nesulted in 162 citations
being issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a
dedicated motor officer. The SLAP program (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in 209 citations
being issued during February.
Monthly Departmental Report - Police Department
During the month of February, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
123 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the
month, calls and on-sight actiYity resulted in the criminal anrest and filings on 14 misdemeanor cases
and one felony case. Officers McElvain and Rahn continued to provide training to security staff
during the month. The mall officers continued to work to prevent vehicle theft and vehicle burglaries.
There were no vehicle thefts and/or vehicle burglaries reported during the month of February at the
mall.
Our five school resource officers have remained active during February. The school resource
officers conducted many counseling sessions with students. A total of 80 investigations/reports
were conducted/written by the school resource officers during February. The school resource
officers made misdemHanor arrests br battery and possession of marijuana.
The Old Town Storefront serves as an office for the POP Teams and a location to assist the public
with police services. During February, the Old Town Storefront served 216 customers. Fifteen sets
of fingerprints were taken, 45 police reports ~re written, and 11 citations ~re signed off.
During the month of February, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team), consisting of Officers
Jon Wade and Gary Lee, continued working a number of sensitive investigations that will probably
yield arrests and contraband during March. Officer Wade was also off for a good portion of the
month due to the birth of his son. The SET Team continues to play an active role in the
enforcement of street Il3vel narcotics and special problems in Temecula.
The "Good Ole Days Car Show" took place in Old Town from Friday, February 27'h through Sunday,
February 29th, drawing huge crowds estimated to be around 25,000 for Saturday's attendance. The
event was a complete success, with no problems noted by the Temecula Police Department. There
were no arrests associated with the event, and while the numbers of attendees were larger than
ever before, the crowd was orderly and seemed to enjoy the show.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral part of the T emecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Bob Ridley and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 465 hours of service in February.
Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event assistance and
telephone answering duties.
Community Action Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have continued their activities, patrolling the city
for graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs
and special events. Other duties these yolunteers attend to are business checks and abandoned
vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from
occurring. CAP Team members contributed 196 hours of service to the community during the
month of February.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police clepartment. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcemEmt, crime prevention and a variety of special functions. Reserve police
officers worked a total of 95 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula during February.
The Temecula Citizen Corps Program continued to make good progress during the month of
February. The executive body, or the TCC Council, continues to hold their bi-~ekly meetings at
Station 84. The council is comprised ofrepresentatiyes from the police and fire departments, the
Monthly Departmental Report-Police Department
City, local business, th,~ Temecula Valley Unified School District, the American Red Cross, and a
local citizen. Almost all of the yolunteer leadership positions have now been filled, and the program
is progressing well toward meeting the goals provided by members of the city council. Recruitment
continues and the orøanization's policies haye now been formalized and documented in an
administrative and operational manual. There was a general meeting for the volunteer membership
of TCC held in the Council Chambers on February 25th, and there was good attendance for the
meeting. There are now about 100 yolunteers working within the TCC.
Monthly Oepartmenta! Report - Police Department
ITEM NO.9
FIFtE CHIEF'S REPORT
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO:
Public/Traffic Safety Commission
FROM:
Howard Windsor, Fire Chief
DATE:
March 25, 2004
SUBJECT: 2003 Annual Fire Services Statistics
RECOMMENDATION:
That the PublicfTraffic Safety Commission review and file
DISCUSSION:
The attached report provides the statistical infomnation for the Fire and Emergency Medical Services
(Fire/EMS) incident call:, for 2003. The primary purpose of the information contained within the
attached report is to as:,ure that the Fire/EMS response goal established by the Temecula City
Council is being met. The response service goal is as follows:
To provide a five-minute response to all emergency calls within the Temecula City Limits 90% of the
time.
Response time is defined as:
The time the unit indicates its response to the Emergency Command Center (ECC) until this unit
indicates its arrival at thE! scene of the incident.
Five fire stations proYide the primary coverage within the Temecula City Limits. Although, only four
of these five fire stations are located within the City Limit. The four fire stations located in the City
are Old Town Station 12, Rancho California Station 73, Parkview Station 84, and Wolfcreek Station
92. The fifth fire station that responds into the city is located at the French Valley Airport East of
Temecula. This is a County funded facility. .
In 2003, a total of 4,41 0 calls were responded to within the City. 82% (3,598) of these calls were for
medical related emergencies including medical aids and traffic collisions. As one can quickly see,
providing a timely response and an increased level of medical care (Paramedic Services) is a
significant benefit to the residents of the City. Also, as the statistics indicate, providing the highest
quality of Emergency Medical Services is in direct nexus to providing the greatest amount of citizen
benefit. This coupled with the Public Access to Defibrillation (PAD) Program and Citizen CPR
enhances heart related E!mergency survivability to the greatest extent possible based on currently
known standards.
With regard to response time and meeting the service goal referenced above, of the 4,410 calls
responded to within the city, 91 % of them received their service within five minutes or less. The
average response time to these calls was approximately 4minutes.
With the known approved specific plan development projects, fire staff anticipates the need for
another fire station facility within the Roripaugh Specific Plan. This station will assure the City's
Fire/EMS goals are met as this specific plan develops. Further, enhancing Paramedic Services in
the City, to include Paramedics on our Fire Engines, will be presented as part of our budgetary
submittal for the upcoming fiscal year.
C, \OOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\ANrTA. PYLE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILES\OLK28\TRAFOIC SAFETY COMM YEAR END
MEMO 2003.00C 3/17/04
With respect to Fire Prevention issues the goal here is to maintain a built environment that ensures
a reasonable degree of fire and life safety for the public. We conduct plan review of new buildings
and the fire related systems within them. We also conduct inspections on the new buildings and in
an ongoing program we inspect all existing businesses within the city. The attached report shows
our performance measured primarily in turn around of plan reviews for new construction, our most
measurable indicator. Fire Prevention also is responsible for Public Information and Education, and
although this is difficult 1:0 analyze based on performance standards, you can see in the attached
report we do make literéllly thousands of individual contacts each year promoting safety.
The Department of Fore,stry and Fire Protection and Riverside County Fire Department value the
long-standing relationship it has had with the CityofTemeculat hrough the Cooperative Fire
Services Agreement process. We continue to evaluate our business practices to enhance our
services for the good of our organization and the professional services expected by local
government in maintaining these Cooperative Fire Service Agreements.
ATTACHMENT:
2003 Year End Statistics
C, \DOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\MITA.PYLE\LOCAL SETTINGS\TEMPORARY INTERNET FILBS\OLK28\TRAF}l;IC SAFETY COMM YEAR END
MEMO 2003.DOC 3/17/04
.
emecula Fire Services
Response Statistics
ivity Year To Date
i
In/Out Cit) In Oul
Medical Aids 2869 824
Traffic Collisiom, 729 249
RinJriß ~ Alanns .. No Fire 232 50
RinJrin,g Alarms .. With Fire I 0
Commercial Stm::ture Fires 9 0
Residential Strucmre Fires 10 9
Ve,getation Fires 6 II
Other Fire 46 15
False Alarms 156 68
Public Service Assists 197 47
Fire Menace Standbys 119 26
Haz Mats 21 12
Other Incidents 15 10
Total 4410 1321
% of Calls on Scene in 5 min or less 91%
AveraQe Resnonse Time 3.84
January to December 2003
Stations 12, 73, 83, 84 and 92
...~
Number of Calls 33
Time Committed ours 8.2
Fire Prevcntion- Suppression Personnel
ctivities Year 10 Date
School Pro,grams 94
Fairs and Disolay:; 77
Com OIlS 1611
LE-38 Dooryard InsDeCtions 722
BurninQ Permits Issued 182
Pre Plans 103
Total 2789
Other Incidents
Haz Mats
Fire Menace Standbys
Public Service Assists
False Alarms
Other Fire
Vegetation Fires
Residential Structure Fires
Commercial Structure Fires
Ringing Alarms - With Fire
Ringing Alarms - No Fire
Traffic Collisions
Medical Aids
Station In and Out of City Activity Breakdown
ails
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
Other Incidents
Haz Mats
Fire Menace Standbys
Public Service Assists
False Alarms
Other Fire
Vegetation Fires
Residential Structure Fires
Commercial Structure Fires
Ringing Alarms - With Fire
Ringing Alarms - No Fire
Traffic Collisions
Medical Aids
Station In and Out of City Activity Breakdown
lis
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
II
Paramedic
Emergency Response Statistics
January to December 2003
III/OllICit; Year 10 Date
Medical Aids 2282
Traffic Collisions 583
F:escues 0
Commercial Structure Fires 18
F:esidential Structure Fires 52
Vehicle Fires 6
Vee:etation Fires 0
Imorovement Fires 4
F:efuse Fires 2
F:inJÓ11 !;Alanns 23
Public Service Assists 39
Fire Menace Standbys 6
Haz Mats 5
Cover Assi !;l\ßlents I
Other Incidents 4
Total 3025
% of Calls on Scene in 5 min or less 91.0%
Averae:e Resoonse Time 3.9
Other Incidents
Cover Assignments
HaL Mats
Fire Menace Standbys
Public Service Assists
Ringing Alarms
Refuse Fires
Improvement Fires
Vegetation Fires
Vehicle Fires
Residential Structure Fires
Commercial Structure Fires
Rescues
Traffic Collisions
Medical Aids
12003 Paramedic Assists Breakdown I
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
-
re Prevention Bureau Statistics
January to December 2003
I
Check Statistics Year to Date
Buildinp TI 322
NCOM Buildinl! 184
UG Water 170
OverlUnder Ground Tanks 3
NCOM Snrinkler 145
SDrlnlder n 143
Hood Duct 37
Snray Booths 1
Snecial SuDDression Systems 2
Alarms 214
Plaonin" Cases 216
Sœcial Code Permits 0
Miscellaneeous 229
Total 1666
!
Inspection Statistics Year to Date
Fire C of 0 235
Shell Final 5
UG ¡¡ç-dro 45
Thrust Blocks 46
Over Head Hydro 182
Fire Flow 4
Flush 48
SDrinkler Final 147
Weld~Íion 31
Hood Duct Final 22
Alarm Pre-wire 72
Alarm Final 241
Snrav Booth Final I
Fire Saf~rn;;;;ection 60
State Mandated Immection I
SDecial Eve:Œts Insœction 28
P¡;;¡'¡¡;;- Hvdro I
Shear Valves 0
OverlUnder Tank Final 3
Snecial SuDDression SYStem 19
Sneci:l1 Proiect InvesiU!ation 0
Enl!ine Conmanv Follow-un 0
Miscellaneous 276
Total 1467
Miscellaneous
Special Code Permits
Planning Cases
Alarms
Special Suppression Systems
Spray Booths
Hood Duct
Sprinkler TI
NCOM Sprinkler
Over/Under Ground Tanks
UG Water
NCOM Building
Building TI
¡Prevention Plan Checks I
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
.!!J
,9
~
¡::
0
"¡::
t)
'"
~
.....
¡::
0
"¡::
¡::
'"
£
'"
::>
0
'"
c:
.!J!
Q;
0
'"
~
e
'C
>-
I
C>
c:
'5.
ã:
-¡¡;
c:
ü:
.<:::
Õ
0
ID
>-
~
c.
(f)
~
.~
~
a.
E
æ
::;:
.<:::
'"
::>
ü:
e
-g,
I
'C
OJ
'"
I
i;;
>
0
e
'C
>-
I
CJ
:J
c:
0
is
'"
c.
'"
E
'C
Q;
~
c:
0
'&;
C>
:u¡
'"
>
E
U
'"
'õ'
èï.
-¡¡;
c:
ü:
-'"
c:
OJ
l-
i;;
'C
c:
:J
~
>
0
c:
0
is
'"
c.
'"
E
'C
'"
10
'C
c:
OJ
::2;
'"
10
1i5
-¡¡;
'õ
'"
c.
(f)
a
a
'"
a
'"
'"
a
a
'"
a
'"
a
a
a
'"
a
0
õ
0
~
ü:
THIS PAGE
LEFT INTENTIONALLY BLANK