Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout050504 PC Agenda . In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909)" 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II) AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE MAY 5,2004 - 6:00 P.M. **-*.. Next in Order: Resolution No. 2004-020 CALL TO ORDER Flag Salute: RollCall: Commissioner Guerriero Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item .!!2! on the Agenda, a salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Commission Secretary. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary Q[ÎQ[ to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three (3) minute time limit for individual speakers. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. . 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of May 5, 2004 R: \P LAN CO M MIA ge nd a s \2 004 \05-05-04. d 00 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 17, 2004 COMMISSION BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard In support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the projects In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or In written correspondences delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. Continued from April 7, 2004 3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0227 and PA03-0625 a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 4.28 acres into 60 sinale-familv residential lots averaaina 3.000 sauare feet. and a Development Plan to consider the architectural desian and placement of proposed homes, located north of Harveston Lake, west of Loop Drive. and east of the Lakefront Cottaaes, Donald Hazen, Principal Planner. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Next regular meeting: May 19, 2004 Council Chambers 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 ADJOURNMENT R: \PLANe 0 M MlAg e n de s \2 004 105-0 5-04. d oc 2 ITEM #2 . . . MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 17, 2004 CALL TO ORDER The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music. ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute. ROLL CALL Present: Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Chiniaeff, and Chairman Telesio. Absent: None. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Aaenda RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 17, 2004. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. COMMISSION BUSINESS Continued from February 18, 2004 2 Plannina Application No. PA03-0429 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct two 8.573 square foot office/warehouse buildinas on 1.87 acres of land located at the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West At this time the Public Hearing was opened. R:IMinutesPCI031704 Mr. Dean Davidson, 40023 Myrtlewood Court, architect for the project relayed that the applicant has made changes as requested by staff. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-013. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-013 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0429, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO 8,~73 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS ON 1.87 ACRES OF LAND, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE SOUTH AND ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 921-480-079 & 921-480-08 New Items 3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0707 a Second Extension of Time for Plannina Application No. PAOO-0276 a Development Plan to desian and construct a 15. 883 square foot office buildina on a .64 acre lot located on the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North Associate Planner Harris presented staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following: . . That the planning application is a second extension of time; . That staff determined that there are no outstanding issues in terms of Development Code provisions; . That during review of the time extension request, the Public Works Department requested that one additional condition of approval be added to address the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (see Condition of Approval no. 39); . That all previous conditions of approval have remained the same. At this time, the Public Hearing was opened. Mr. Michael Richter, 41635 Enterprise Circle, spoke on behalf of the applicant relaying that the applicant concurs with the Conditions of Approval. At this time, the Public Hearing was closed. MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-014. CõiññifSsioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval. . R:IMinutesPCI031704 2 . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0707 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-0276 (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A 15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING (KEETON BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013. COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS For Commissioner Guerriero, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed she would explore the gas station issue on Del Rio. For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that there will be a meeting held with Bill Storm, Shawn Nelson, Gary Thornhill, and Bill Hughes in regard to Harveston, on Monday, March 22, 2004. Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with the dress code not being enforced at the Promenade. For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she has passed her dress code concerns to Steve Brown, who has contacted the Police Department. Chairman Telesio relayed that the State of the City Address will be held March 25, 2004, at Pechanga. Chairman Telesio also noted that he spoke with Jean and Elton Ward and they will be returning to the next Planning Commission meeting. PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT Director of Planning Ubnoske reminded the Commissioners to turn in their Form 700. Ms. Ubnoske also noted that she has some very good candidates for the assistant/associate and senior planner positions. Ms. Ubnoske queried if the Commissioners would be interested in name badges. R:IMinutesPCI031704 3 ADJOURNMENT At 6:12 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reClular meetinCl to be held on Wednesdav. April 7. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. John Telesio Chairman Debbie Ubnoske Director of Planning R:\MinutesPCIO31704 4 . . . ITEM #3 . . . Date of Meeting: Prepared by: STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION May 5,2004 Don Hazen Title: Principal Planner File Number Application Type: Tentative Tract Map/Development Plan P A03-0227 /03-0625 Project Description: Recommendation: (Check One) CEQA: (Check One) Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 4.28 acres into 60 single family residential lots averaging approximately 3,000 square feet, and a Development Plan to consider the architectural design and placement of the proposed homes within the tract. ~ Approve with Conditions D Deny 0 Continue for Redesign D Continue to: D Recommend Approval with Conditions D Recommend Denial ~ Categorically Exempt CEQA 15162 0 Negative Declaration D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R,ID 1'12003\03-0625 AshvillelSUlff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY . Applicant: Greystone Homes 4/22/04 Completion Date: 7/22/04 Mandatory Action Deadline Date: Medium Residential General Plan Designation: Zoning Designation: SP-13 (Harveston SP)-Medium 2 Residential (7-13 du/ac.) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Lot Area: Site: Undeveloped North: South: East: West: Single family residential Single family residential Single family residential City lake 4.28 acres 10.8 du/ac . Proposed Density N/A Landscape Area/Coverage 2 covered Parking Required/Provided BACKGROUND SUMMARY [gJ 1. (or) 01. [gJ 2. (or) 02. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff. The application review has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-wide Design Guidelines, the Harveston Specific Plan, and the Development Code. The attached "Project Review Worksheef' (Attachment A) has been completed and indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval. . R,\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report mugh <haft Ashville.doc . . . ANALYSIS Tentative Tract Map The proposed 60-lot tentative tract map is consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and the "Medium 2 Residential" land use designation of the Harveston Specific Plan. The Specific Plan states that the intent of the Medium 2 Residential designation is to "provide residential homes on average 2,500 square foot lots and will be targeted for small-lot single family detached and small-lot single family attached town homes" (SP pg. 3-5). The proposed subdivision is for sixty single family lots averaging 3,000 square feet which equates to a density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre. The map has been extensively revised to satisfy all departments and the final design meets with staff's acceptance in terms of access, parking, trash collection, and home orientation. Access to the interior private loop street will be from Newport Road and Booth Bay Road. Internal circulation will be provided by the interior loop road (32 feet curb-to-curb with sidewalks on one side), alleys (24 foot wide, no parking), and pedestrian access to the lake park via three open space corridors. All homes will present a façade to the interior loop street, whether they are technically sides, fronts, or rears. Product Review The applicant proposes to construct sixty (60) detached single family residences having seven (7) elevations and three (3) floor plans ranging from 1,650-2,170 square feet. The seven architectural styles will be Monterey, Spanish, Italianate, Prairie, Craftsman, Cottage, and Colonial. Recognizing the challenges of small lot subdivision design, staff has worked with the applicant to develop a product design that is consistent with the Specific Plan and will present a quality aesthetic appearance, as viewed from the lake and surrounding streets. The key areas that staff emphasized were varying the rooflines, architectural authenticity, and using the landscape interface to help reduce the appearance of mass and bulk. In staff's opinion, the application as revised, successfully achieves those objeciives. 1. Varying rooflines: The selected architectural styles lend themselves to variety and the opportunity for varying rooflines (see Sheet CS-O and Plan elevations). To further enhance the roofline variation and break up the side yard mass, staff also recommended adding partial three-story elements to some of the Plans. The previous design featured all two-story homes with minimal building separation and little variation in roof heights. Architectural Authenticity: Each of the seven architectural styles carry elements described in the Specific Plan Design Guidelines (SP pgs 10-69-78). 2. Spanish: Two-story massing, 4:12 pitch S-tile roof with intersecting gables, stucco over foam arched windows and doors to provide recess-look. Other noteworthy features include wrought iron accents, side-on courtyards, 5:12 entry roof pitch. Recommendation: Specify light sand stucco finish. Cottage: Plans 1,2. and 3 have a Cottage style. Elements include varying roof pitches from 4: 12 to 11: 12, 24-inch eaves, flat concrete roof tiles, and stone veneer at the base. KID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report cough draft Ashville.doc 3. Recommendation: Include window-paned garage door as standard on Lots 35, 29, 9, and 6; specify light to medium sand finish or light lace stucco finish, Prairie: The plan shows two-story massing with horizontal design, vertical windows, 24 inch eaves, flat concrete roof tiles, and covered entries with stone base. . Recommendation: Specify fine to light sand stucco finish. Italianate: Two-story massing with vertical and horizontal breaks. and third story addition for variation within tract, 4:12 and 5:12 roof pitches, tapered stucco columns, belt course trim, and arched windows at upper level. Recommendation: Increase eave to 24 inches and add stuc(:o soffits; specify fine to light sand stucco finish. Craftsman: Hardi-board siding with carry over to sides and rear, flat concrete roof tiles, and entry porches with stone base. Recommendation: Eliminate third-story element in order to help accentuate side-to-side width of structure. Monterey: Wood balcony and railings, 12 inch eaves, round tile attic vents, and window shutters. Recommendation: Substitute S-tile with barrel tile roof; substitute stone veneer with brick painted to match stucco. . Landscaping: The proposed lots Harveston Specific Plan permit$ the sideyard setbacks to be a minimum of four feet. Therefore, it is important that the architectural design and landscaping provide a visual break between the homes to avoid the appearance of excessive massing. In this case, the plan has incorporated opposing courtyards on some model placements to help provide greater building separation. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 01. (or) [8J 1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class, name, type) The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved EIR and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). In addition, the City Attorney has reviewed correspondence received from the Pechanga Cultural Resources on May 12, 2003, and has opined that there is no legal basis to impose additional mitigation measures beyond those that were approved with the certified EIR for Harveston. The City Attorney believes that as conditioned, this project is incompliance with CEQA. . (or) KID 1'12003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Report ,"ugh <haft Ashville.doc . . . 01. An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project. CO NCLUSION/RECOMM ENDA TION Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution approving the application with the following findings and attached conditions of approval. FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map (Code Section 16.09.140) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code because the project has been designed for single family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses specified for this Planning Area in the HaNeston Specific Plan. The tentative map dOes not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed land division is not land designated for conseNation or agricultural use and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The project consists of a 69-lot Tentative Tract Map which includes 60 single family residential lots and 9 lots for private streets and open space on properly designated for low-medium density residential use. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land use assumptions of the EIR prepared for the HaNeston Specific Plan. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building Departments and has been conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of grading and construction will be R,\D 1'12003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport rough draft Ashville.doc 8. inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state and local codes. . 6. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive (;Ir natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single- family residences the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The City's parkland dedication requirements are c(;lvered in the Development Agreement approved with the Harveston Specific Plan and the map provides public access to the lake park. Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010) 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. . The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and applicable provisions of the development code and the Harveston Specific Plan in which the site is located. The plan will permit the development of 60 single family dwellings at a density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre, which is less than the maximum density of 13 dwelling units per acre permitted by the Harveston Specific Plan for this area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium Residential and implements the land use goals specified for Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan. The proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements I the vicinity. \ The homes will be constructed according to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes and will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. . R,\D 1"2003\03-0625 A,hvillelStaff Report ,"ugh drnft "'hviUe.doc . . . ATTACHMENTS 1. Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8 2. PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 9 Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Planning Application No. PA03-0227 Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Planning Application No. PA03-0625 R:\D P\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough Waft Ashville.doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 PLAN REDUCTIONS R:ID 1'\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc [}={] ~ [Ri ~ [g ~ lJ (Q) ~ TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31276 C~~ (\d)~ 1r~m~<e~~~, C(\d)~ti"ù~ (\d)~ R~'¥'~~~~cdJ~, §~~~~ (\d)~ C~~~~(\d)mü~ ~-4-~- ~s 21V ~~, I , I , "" "I" "" ...f~-1 ~--: :r--:'~~ STREET'S: 'A',;'P' 'C' 'D'&'E' _It~. J "ì r" f. ALLEY SECTION "" r. "'" r '" -- " J ;---f---'-+=-~-~ "'1H{ .~ .1 ~ ,,-11-" NEWPORT ROAD -----...,---- ------- ~------ ~: :'~::;;;:;:;;è~:'~:::~'::: ""'~, ~ VlC:::::V- MAP - . I - "1U~-,~,. BOOTH BAY ROAD & NEWPORT ROAD TIT ~~bSI HARVESTON DRIVE or-------, ====:].' "" ; " " I ~14" I~~!~ HARVESTDN DRIVE ~û\jf~;;~~~ ~SMES "'. ~----- -----.-.- ------.- ---- --.- ----- -- ------- -~" ---- - ==::::-=---"if -------¡:::::;:5 ;;,~p'~;,,;.~o,N ASSE"'O'S PARC" NUM"". -,,~..,,-,~. ".." BAS" OF BEAR"," NO'" ¡Pl~1.~rt~~..j~) ¡¡;~Jf£'7ij.1~:¡¡: "ENERAL "FORMATION , """.,~~. ,"m' , _M ,~ ~ ""W"',..~ , ".~"m '-0 '. mm.,.,. ~"""m -".,. ~""'"m , _..".~. "'œ"._m.~""'"m . - " .,."m""~'~'~"'~""""'.'"' " ..'"'-~"'-"",-,--"'" _.n.. .,," Ho. ,~ ,. .,~. "- -, " '-fl~"'~;;:¡' :; r;jfJ~;~¡:;::::.~~:~J :,:: :~';;:: :;;:;,;; ',: <AND USE SUMMARY ="i1'!~.¡."" "..,.œ "~"m"""'""" ."" ¡¡¡:¡¡.'!'"J;:'~:J'" "MM"" i ¡¡¡¡ .""m, '" -,-, '" " .".,,'" "'".._,.".. ""."", ," "-",,. "'NTATIVE TAACT NO. 31276 APR 19 --'*=~. ~-~~ ,- P'ann'n" App"c~'an No. 03-am COVER SHEET HARVESTON TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31276 1 ¡ . I I , . ",~, ElEVATION LEGEND M ~,,~, S I n~'~'" p CR C"",- COT. "m~ COL. ,~~", ~ "'C~~_MAP I I ~[f"""""o ""..coL"o" O. ~.;:::::~ldf~ l;o~.':1':"~U¡'" - - "."~,Iu~""", "".". - ,~'."""',"""'..n c"' n. ~"":';f"¡:'~;~;' ""'::;::: ~,,"::';::::~'~:¡;, """"""-- . """"h"" ."" ::"::':.~". TYPlëAL LOT TYPICAL L~R 1 9 2DnJ. "~"';"r"'- ~'~ on LEGEND I ,~~"",un", ~ ~ ::.~:;,~~;\~;:~;~;;;~; GREYSTONE HOMES ""..COUmYCENTEAOANE SUITE'" TEMECU~. CA"'" ~== 1 0 4---- I I '.'. i I ~ , i i I I I, ! < 0 ~! ~ ~~ ~, z 0", ¡::ffi «u 1;;", -'¡... "'", ~~ c< u. r Ii ~ê. ! i F~. . ~.' i il ¡ ~~~ ¡,. ¡ ~¡¡~ ¡ , Zo ::; o~ ~~; '" E-< ~ ~" '"' rLJ 0- "", '"' ,~,'" ~z ;:~ - ~~ <0 " :> ,L "... ~ ~~ ~~ 0 ."' <; "~ =: ~ " if 0 . , ¡ ~ii~! i- - ~~ ,,~ , ,1:, ~~" Ii o' ~ I"I! g. ~.~ I:i~ !A ILl_,- OW 0 I" \. 1. ,:, :~ " ~ ¡ I I Zo : OB ~~ '" Eo< ~ ~:c '" 000- "", . '" [;oJ >~ ~ z ;:~ :¡~ <0 '" ;>." ;... ~ ,,; ~;:: c .'" <~ eO: . to ::c ~ o.¡", >aJo ~~~ ~!;¡~ o..gj~ "'1-0 <en o.¡ '" -' ! I ! l r I \ hk I I "h'.,..", \r"'f"~ , If!, . J~~c --~ . :q: LJ: I [J ~ u ;¡ 0 . . . ~~~-=---~ // ===---=-----~~ . ---------- --------------- LA~E FRO~T GREES9EL T .\!TOcm'RI ~~ ------- - -, ==;1 "- --C.' ' ~ ~ U J /-----,V;-(Ž; ;L:~, \ CONCEPTUAL PLOT PLAN ASHVILLF. AT .HARVESTON 'I"",.,\\",\IJI',,"H' ell \SI I 1"'"lll'.C."""R'IA 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . ~... . ~ ~ 1 ,~i~ ~~jg ~~~- g ~ >.j ¡ ~;8~ ~~¡~ .,;§ ~~~~ m~ ~ãji . ¡ I ¡i¡ii!!!! ¡ill ¡Iii II!i JIii III! ¡Iii ¡¡I! I!i! ml -.~ïi.;.'h;...¡..! ~~m ~.~~~ .." ~~~:~~ .~~.!~ .-.,.¡~I ~i:!.~..,.¡~.P¡.<.~.! ¡e.'.o;.,~ ..: .<C' "" m, !!I! )II! 'm 1'" -;, . ,," ",¡ 1"tÓ~S1" -h. ~iW mE ~~i~ ~I;~' â". ><'; _. "" ::'0 ,,:: '°"" ~"~: :::, ~,¡¡! 1m m¡ 0" ~~ !r~ ~ ~ ~ :1 ~.! gS~ ¡1.!§lrÏf ¡ -':~I- ,. I II II I :e 18 0 z o~ ~~ .. Eo< ~ ~o ',. 3 I:I)~- ,= : >~f;¡;J~~ ~~ ! = >" <0 ~ ø::~. ;... ó ~~ -< ~ ~.. =" .~ 0 . . . :J ~ ..J ~ æ ~ " ß v .1 Ii! ~----- I ' j I~ ~ 1 ~ 0 -0 ~~~ 11-1 g~~ I!§¡ -,¡~J :z: 0 "' o~ <'" '" E--~ ~~ j Cf)~- ~= >~f;!J;~ ~~ ;. >~~ .¿ô ~ ~ ~ ~g :=; ~~ ~- . . " ~ ~,-c o~ 0 0 0 ~ ... g¡ ¡;: ., I' e-..-, Il'~ H I - ~ I~ g ',,81 .. IL~J . ,-, ;~ -' '~ .~ Zc '" O~ .. ~ ;;::£ '" ¡..~ ~o ~~:~; ~; ~ > ~~ :;0 < ~: ~~ <~ ~;:;' =~ "~ . I~"~- Ii /- \ // " L¿- :_' ~ .~ I :I Q I ~ ,i" ~ v- '1 . 0 0 . . . D -' '" >- '" ..J l- V) ~ ---l ----:;;¡ _1 -.,. I I L'è. ___i I I , i '" I ~ I ,j:':. -I Jz!" ..,., ..- õ: ~ '" -' " z p ~ !~ rY ¡L- -\H ! --;1 Jl' JJ n i!¡! i', ~., ," :3~~ :! i.- '1'- JU. h !t Zo V) o~ ~; '" ¡..~ ~o ~ oo~- ~:: ;~~::; ~~ :: ......~~ .¿õ V) ....- <" ~ I- < ~i ~~ == ~ <; I I - ~r: \ ~..-I I I 'oL i I 0 D ATTACHMENT NO.2 PC RESOLUTION NO.2004 - R:ID 1'12003103-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc . . . PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-- RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0227 AND PA03-0625, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TIM 31276) TO SUBDIVIDE 4.28 ACRES INTO SIXTY (60) SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS AVERAGING 3,000 SQUARE FEET, AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVING THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF SIXTY (60) HOMES WITHIN THE TRACT ("ASHVILLE"), LOCATED IN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN. WHEREAS, Greystone Homes filed Planning Application No, PA03-0227 and PA03- 0625 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application on May 5, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Tentative Tract Map Findinas. That the Planning Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code because the project has been designed for single family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses specified for this Planning Area in the Harveston Specific Plan. R,\D 1'\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 10 I B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land, hich is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 19 5. I The proposed land division is not land designated for cons Nation or agricultural use and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contra ts. I ¡ . C. The site is physically suitable for the type and prop sed density of development proposed by the tentative map. I I The project consists of a 69-lot Tentative Tract Map whic includes 60 single family residential lots and 9 lots for private streets and open space on property designated for low-medium density residential use. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed impr vements, with conditions of approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental da age or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. : The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land yse assumptions of the EIR prepared for the HaNeston Specific Plan. I E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. ~ The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building epartments and has been conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of gradl g.and construction will be inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state a d local codes. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future PtSSive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive r natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior. 0 the construction of single- family residences the applicant will be required to submit t)uilding plans to the Building Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, ~hich contains requirements for energy conseNation. I I ' G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improyements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through 01 use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required rights-of-way and easements have been pro ided on the Tentative Map. The Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and/or mbdifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. I : H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkl¡p.ndl dedication requirements (Quimby). I , The City's parkland dedication requirements are covered in the De lelopment Agreement approved with the Harveston Specific Plan and the map provides PfbliÇ access to the lake park. Section 3. Development Plan Findinas. That the Plannirg Commission, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required: in Section 17.05.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code. I RI\D P\2003\O3.Q625 Ashville\StaffReport wugh dnlft Ashville.doc 11 . . . . . A. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and applicable provisions of the development code and the Harveston Specific Plan in which the site is located. The plan will permit the development of 60 single family dwellings at a density of 10.8 dwelling units per acre, which is less than the maximum density of 13 dwelling units per acre permitted by the Harveston Specific Plan for this area. B. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium Residential and implements the land use goals specified for Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan. C. The proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be detrimental to the public health safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or improvements I the vicinity. Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves the application (PA 03-0227 and PA03-0625) a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 31276) and Development Plan for the lot creation, and architectural design and placement of sixty (60) single family residences in Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A and Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 5th day of May 2004. John Telesio, Chairperson ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] R:ID P\2oo3\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 12 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA ) ) ss ) I I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Co mission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by he IPlanning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5t day of May 2004, by the fu~~~ I AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary I R,ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshviUe\Staff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc 13 . . . EXHIBIT A CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0227 (Tentative Tract Map 31276) R:ID P\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 14 . . . EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-00227 (Tentative Tract Map 31276) Project Description: Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 ("Ashville") subdividing 4.28 acres into sixty (60) single- family residential lots averaging 3,000 square feet generally located north of Harveston Lake, west of Loop Drive, and east of the Lakefront Cottages tract within Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan area; known as Assessors Parcel No. 911-180-02, 03, 04 and 015. DIF Category: MSHCP Category: Per the Development Agreement TUMF Fee: Single Family Residential Single Family Residential Approval Date: May 5,2004 Expiration Date: May 5, 2007 PLANNING DEPARTMENT General Requirements 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One thousand three hundred and fourteen dollars ($1314,00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, RID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc 15 3. employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and age ts.City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, ~ proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in th defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City de ms to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of Ca ifo~nia Subdivision Map Act and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accord nce with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days p iorto the expiration date. 4. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this ondition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City wit I Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetarr damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the ap,proval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appefl board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be dêemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or !appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agehts. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, çr proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deJms to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. I If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasina plan shall b~ submitted to and approved by the Planning Director. I Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approvad Exhibit "B" (Conceptual Landscape Plan) on file in the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable i¡>atisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not bein,g maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the property oWner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The çontinued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the devêloper or any successors in interest. 5. 6. 7. , The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring; Program for the Harveston Specific Plan and contained on file in the Planning Deparmtent. If at any time during excavation/construction of the !site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the pro~erty owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all turther excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion may require the property to depos\t a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or a~thorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. ' 8. R,\D 1'12003\03-0625 AshviUe\Staff Report rough drnft AshviUe.doc 16 . . . . Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 9. 10. 11. 12. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 13. . . The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department: a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) applicable for the tract. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes, Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. Ii. Iii. R,ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc 17 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the t ntative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constr ints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubm tted for further review and œ~~ I A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading ¡all be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of an construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. , An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Depart en.,t of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or pro osed City right-of-way. All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguou~ to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. { The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Condition of Approval for Harveston Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99-0418) as approved on August 1 ,2001. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of!Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29639(PAOO-0295) as approved on August 14, 2001. ¡ Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indi¡cated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved¡ subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: ¡ I As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works,¡ the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: ¡ a. San Diego Regional WaterQuality Control Board I b. Rancho California Water District I c. Eastern Municipal Water District I d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District I City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau Planning Department Department of Public Works Riverside County Health Department Cable TV Franchise 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. Community Services District General Telephone Southern California Edison Company Southern California Gas Company m. KID P\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report mugh draft Ashville.doc 18 . . . . 21. 22. 23. 24, 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. . 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. . Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A and/or 208. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with Specific Plan Standards. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and 401 or as modified in the Specific Plan. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. All knuckles shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 602. All cul-de-sacs shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 600. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right- of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Harveston Drive on the Final Map. Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Newport Road on the Final Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Booth Bay Road on the Final Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. 36. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 37. R,ID P\2003\03-0625 AshviUelStaff Report rough draft AshviUe.doc 19 38. 39. 40. 41. The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any unde lying maps related to the subject property. I The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchise of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of st eet improvements. I Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks meander through private property. . Easements, when required for roadway slopes, lands ape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if the~ are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveya1ces shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Pub ic Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating, "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. " I Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 42. 43. 44. 45. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: ' a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conserva ion District c. Planning Department d. Department of Public Works . 46. A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Departmelj1t of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorpor~te adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from drmage due to erosion. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading ~an check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pave ent sections. I A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Ergineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site ¡or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runpff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runotr without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interVal of one hundred years. The Developer must comply with the requirements of the ¡National Pollutant DiSCharge. R,ID NO03\o3.0625 MhvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc 20 . . . 47. 48. 49. Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other drainage lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 50. 51. 52. 53. 54. Prior to the first building permit, Final Map 31276 shall be approved and recorded. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and Developer dated August 28, 2001. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 55. 56. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. R:\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drafr Ashville.doc 2t 57. , I I All improvements shall be constructed and completed per t e approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 58. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall bt repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. I FIRE DEPARTMENT I 59. Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full force and effect unless superceded by more stringent reqUir,m~nts here. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be b1ed on occupancy. use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CF ). and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 61. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The devl3loper shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM ¡¡t 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow rj'lay be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction, type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention ßureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 60. , The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire: hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" Xi 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent pub ic streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be Idcated no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) I I The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum ~ire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The de~eloper shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow /nay be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention ,Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provi<¡Jed. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) ¡ I The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 47 x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be Idcated no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access rqad(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of e><istir( 1ire ~ rraybe required. (CFC 9032, 903.42, ï A :perdx III-B) R,\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport rough draft Ashville.doc ! 62. 63. 64. 22 . . . . 65. 66. 67. 68. 69. 70. . 71. 72. 73. 74. . All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) R,\D P\2003\03-Q625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 23 75. 76. I Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or buil ing final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. ( F([; 901.4.3) All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Depart ent access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provid d "Yith the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CF 902.4) I i I Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to th Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) igital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electr nic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected n a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau ust' accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of th s ciondition. Special Conditions 77. 78. Any existing water system in support of hydrants or fire sp~inkler systems that was installed as a common system serving the property that w II now be divided into more than one parcel will be the responsibility of ALL PARCELS and will be maintained and repaired by ALL PARCELS in perpetuity. COMMUNITY SERVICES General Conditions I The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid aste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul c01struction debris. All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenan?e shall be identified on the final map by numbered lot and indexed to identify said lot number as proposed TCSD maintenance area. i All private streets, alleys as well as the parkways within thelright of ways along Newport and Booth Bay Roads, residential streetlights on private strøets, open space, pedestrian access areas, monumentation and fencing shall be maintai~ed by an established Home Owner's Association. i I Prior to Issuance of Building Permits I 85. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrange~ents made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. Prior to issuance of building permit or the installation of additional street lighting to be maintained by TCSD, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD application process, submit the approved Edison streetlighti improvement plans and pay the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program. I i ! 82. 83. 84. 86. R,\D P\2003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 24 . . . . . . Prior to Certificate of Occupancy 87. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 88. The developer or his assignee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 89. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name RID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 25 EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAO3-0625 (Development Plan) R:\D P\2003\O3-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc 26 . . . EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No. PA03-0625 (Development Plan) Project Description: A Development Plan to approve the architectural design and placement of sixty (60) single family residences located within Tract 31276 ("Ashville"), generally located north of Harveston Lake, west of Loop Drive, and east of the Lakefront Cottages tract within Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan. DIF: TUMPF: Per Development Agreement MSHCP: Per Development Agreement Single Family Residential Approval Date: May 5, 2004 May 5,2006 Expiration Date: PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c). General Requirements 2. The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the R:\D /'\2003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Repon rough draft Ashville.doc 27 3. , I I permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding br ught forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of th action and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require a. ditional deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any un~sed portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fai;to either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter b responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or in trumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fa/I to timely post the required deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval t'thout further notice to the applicant. This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the appr val date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period. hich is thereafter diligently pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utililation contemplated by this approval. Building elevations shall substantially conform to the a. proved Exhibits, including elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained on file with the Planning Department or as amended by theS¡ changes. The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials shall requi(e approval of the Director of Planning. ! I This approval is for product review only and shall in no: way limit the city or other regulatory or service agencies from applying additional req~irements and/or conditions consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the, review of grading, building and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. I : : The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on th~ plans prior to the issuance of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are rreasured from the inside of garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipmen~ pedestals, bollards or any similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is morr than 8" above the garage floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edpe of the stem wall. Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before constructibn, including Encroachment Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. I I Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site. I Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards. In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited to 24' maximum. i . . 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. . R,\D 1',2003\03-0625 Ashville\StaffReport <Dugh <haft Ashville.doc 28 . . . Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits 11. 12. The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the Planning Department. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits 13. 14. 15. Any optional exterior treatments such as garage doors or front doors shall be shown on the construction plans and be subject to Planning Department review and approval. The construction plans shall indicate the following: a. Cottage: Window-paned garage door as standard on Lots 35, 29, 9, and 6; Light to Medium sand finish or light lace stucco Prairie: Fine to Light sand finish stucco Italianate: 24-inch eaves; stucco soffits; and Fine to Light sand stucco finish Craftsman:Eliminate third-story Monterey: Barrel tile roof; brick veneer painted to match stucco b. c. d. e. 16. The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for PAOO-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Harveston Specific Plan. 17. The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval of the Postmaster and Planning Director. 18. Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown, The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of building permits: Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model Home complex permit. 19, R:ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport cough draft Ashville.doc 29 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough raping plans, plotting plan, structural setback measurements shall be submitted and ap roved. The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director th t ail homes will have double paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to rekluce noise from occasional aircraft over flights. I I The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recyc ed, through the City's solid waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Serv ce~ Department. All design components shall comply with applicable provisio s bf the 1998 edition of the California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Code; 1998 National Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and isabled Access Regulations and the Temecula Municipal Code. . Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior 0 commencement of any construction work. A pre-construction meeting is required with the biliilding inspector prior to commencement of any construction or inspections. I Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional witl' original signature on plans and structural calculations submitted for plan review. Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel ~chedule for plan review. Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calcula~ions, along with mechanical equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original signed by an appropriate registered professional. I I ' Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior tol submittal of plans for plan review. I Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to ~he project that indicates the hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94- 21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordina~ce No. 457.73, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. ! i Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. : Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. I No work is permitted on Sunday or Governmtnt Holidays Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits 31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have b en installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of wee<ils, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. I Ro\D 1'\2003\03-0625 "'hvillelStaff Report mugh draft A,hville.doc 30 . . . . . . 32. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request. 33. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 34. Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 35. The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e. buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and Community Services Departments. 36. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R,IJ) P'\2003\O3-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc 31