HomeMy WebLinkAbout050504 PC Agenda
. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909)" 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II)
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
MAY 5,2004 - 6:00 P.M.
**-*..
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2004-020
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
RollCall:
Commissioner Guerriero
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item .!!2! on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary Q[ÎQ[ to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action. .
1 Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of May 5, 2004
R: \P LAN CO M MIA ge nd a s \2 004 \05-05-04. d 00
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of March 17, 2004
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard In support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects In court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or In written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Continued from April 7, 2004
3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0227 and PA03-0625 a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide
4.28 acres into 60 sinale-familv residential lots averaaina 3.000 sauare feet. and a
Development Plan to consider the architectural desian and placement of proposed homes,
located north of Harveston Lake, west of Loop Drive. and east of the Lakefront Cottaaes,
Donald Hazen, Principal Planner.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Next regular meeting: May 19, 2004
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
ADJOURNMENT
R: \PLANe 0 M MlAg e n de s \2 004 105-0 5-04. d oc
2
ITEM #2
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH 17, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday, March 17, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Chiniaeff, and Chairman
Telesio.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aaenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of March 17, 2004.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Olhasso seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Continued from February 18, 2004
2 Plannina Application No. PA03-0429 a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to
construct two 8.573 square foot office/warehouse buildinas on 1.87 acres of land located at
the corner of Enterprise Circle South and Enterprise Circle West
At this time the Public Hearing was opened.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
Mr. Dean Davidson, 40023 Myrtlewood Court, architect for the project relayed that the applicant
has made changes as requested by staff.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-013.
Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-013
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0429, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT TWO 8,~73 SQUARE
FOOT OFFICE/WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS ON 1.87 ACRES OF
LAND, LOCATED AT THE CORNER OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE
SOUTH AND ENTERPRISE CIRCLE WEST KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS 921-480-079 & 921-480-08
New Items
3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0707 a Second Extension of Time for Plannina Application
No. PAOO-0276 a Development Plan to desian and construct a 15. 883 square foot office
buildina on a .64 acre lot located on the southwest knuckle of Enterprise Circle North
Associate Planner Harris presented staff report (as per agenda material), noting the following:
.
. That the planning application is a second extension of time;
. That staff determined that there are no outstanding issues in terms of Development
Code provisions;
. That during review of the time extension request, the Public Works Department
requested that one additional condition of approval be added to address the
Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (see Condition of Approval no. 39);
. That all previous conditions of approval have remained the same.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael Richter, 41635 Enterprise Circle, spoke on behalf of the applicant relaying that the
applicant concurs with the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to adopt PC Resolution No. 2004-014.
CõiññifSsioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
2
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-014
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0707 (THE SECOND ONE YEAR EXTENSION OF
TIME) FOR PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAOO-0276
(DEVELOPMENT PLAN) TO DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A
15,883 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING (KEETON
BUILDING), ON A .64 ACRE LOT LOCATED AT THE
SOUTHWEST KNUCKLE OF ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NORTH,
KNOWN AS ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 909-282-013.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
For Commissioner Guerriero, Director of Planning Ubnoske relayed she would explore the gas
station issue on Del Rio.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that there will be a meeting held with Bill
Storm, Shawn Nelson, Gary Thornhill, and Bill Hughes in regard to Harveston, on Monday,
March 22, 2004.
Commissioner Olhasso expressed concern with the dress code not being enforced at the
Promenade.
For Commissioner Olhasso, Director of Planning Ubnoske noted that she has passed her dress
code concerns to Steve Brown, who has contacted the Police Department.
Chairman Telesio relayed that the State of the City Address will be held March 25, 2004, at
Pechanga.
Chairman Telesio also noted that he spoke with Jean and Elton Ward and they will be returning
to the next Planning Commission meeting.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director of Planning Ubnoske reminded the Commissioners to turn in their Form 700.
Ms. Ubnoske also noted that she has some very good candidates for the assistant/associate
and senior planner positions.
Ms. Ubnoske queried if the Commissioners would be interested in name badges.
R:IMinutesPCI031704
3
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:12 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reClular meetinCl to
be held on Wednesdav. April 7. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula.
John Telesio
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPCIO31704
4
.
.
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
May 5,2004
Don Hazen
Title:
Principal Planner
File Number
Application Type:
Tentative Tract
Map/Development Plan
P A03-0227 /03-0625
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
Tentative Tract Map to subdivide 4.28 acres into 60 single family
residential lots averaging approximately 3,000 square feet, and a
Development Plan to consider the architectural design and
placement of the proposed homes within the tract.
~ Approve with Conditions
D Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
D Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
D Recommend Denial
~ Categorically Exempt
CEQA
15162
0 Negative Declaration
D Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R,ID 1'12003\03-0625 AshvillelSUlff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Greystone Homes
4/22/04
Completion Date:
7/22/04
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
Medium Residential
General Plan Designation:
Zoning Designation:
SP-13 (Harveston SP)-Medium 2 Residential (7-13 du/ac.)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Lot Area:
Site:
Undeveloped
North:
South:
East:
West:
Single family residential
Single family residential
Single family residential
City lake
4.28 acres
10.8 du/ac
.
Proposed Density
N/A
Landscape Area/Coverage
2 covered
Parking Required/Provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[gJ 1.
(or)
01.
[gJ 2.
(or)
02.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff.
The application review has been completed and staff has determined that the proposed
project is consistent with the General Plan, City-wide Design Guidelines, the Harveston
Specific Plan, and the Development Code.
The attached "Project Review Worksheef' (Attachment A) has been completed and
indicates that staff cannot make all the findings of consistency required for approval.
.
R,\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report mugh <haft Ashville.doc
.
.
.
ANALYSIS
Tentative Tract Map
The proposed 60-lot tentative tract map is consistent with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and
the "Medium 2 Residential" land use designation of the Harveston Specific Plan. The Specific
Plan states that the intent of the Medium 2 Residential designation is to "provide residential
homes on average 2,500 square foot lots and will be targeted for small-lot single family detached
and small-lot single family attached town homes" (SP pg. 3-5). The proposed subdivision is for
sixty single family lots averaging 3,000 square feet which equates to a density of 10.8 dwelling
units per acre.
The map has been extensively revised to satisfy all departments and the final design meets with
staff's acceptance in terms of access, parking, trash collection, and home orientation. Access to
the interior private loop street will be from Newport Road and Booth Bay Road. Internal
circulation will be provided by the interior loop road (32 feet curb-to-curb with sidewalks on one
side), alleys (24 foot wide, no parking), and pedestrian access to the lake park via three open
space corridors. All homes will present a façade to the interior loop street, whether they are
technically sides, fronts, or rears.
Product Review
The applicant proposes to construct sixty (60) detached single family residences having seven
(7) elevations and three (3) floor plans ranging from 1,650-2,170 square feet. The seven
architectural styles will be Monterey, Spanish, Italianate, Prairie, Craftsman, Cottage, and
Colonial.
Recognizing the challenges of small lot subdivision design, staff has worked with the applicant to
develop a product design that is consistent with the Specific Plan and will present a quality
aesthetic appearance, as viewed from the lake and surrounding streets. The key areas that staff
emphasized were varying the rooflines, architectural authenticity, and using the landscape
interface to help reduce the appearance of mass and bulk. In staff's opinion, the application as
revised, successfully achieves those objeciives.
1.
Varying rooflines: The selected architectural styles lend themselves to variety and the
opportunity for varying rooflines (see Sheet CS-O and Plan elevations). To further
enhance the roofline variation and break up the side yard mass, staff also recommended
adding partial three-story elements to some of the Plans. The previous design featured
all two-story homes with minimal building separation and little variation in roof heights.
Architectural Authenticity: Each of the seven architectural styles carry elements described
in the Specific Plan Design Guidelines (SP pgs 10-69-78).
2.
Spanish: Two-story massing, 4:12 pitch S-tile roof with intersecting gables, stucco over
foam arched windows and doors to provide recess-look. Other noteworthy features
include wrought iron accents, side-on courtyards, 5:12 entry roof pitch.
Recommendation: Specify light sand stucco finish.
Cottage: Plans 1,2. and 3 have a Cottage style. Elements include varying roof pitches
from 4: 12 to 11: 12, 24-inch eaves, flat concrete roof tiles, and stone veneer at the base.
KID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report cough draft Ashville.doc
3.
Recommendation: Include window-paned garage door as standard on Lots 35, 29, 9, and
6; specify light to medium sand finish or light lace stucco finish,
Prairie: The plan shows two-story massing with horizontal design, vertical windows, 24
inch eaves, flat concrete roof tiles, and covered entries with stone base.
.
Recommendation: Specify fine to light sand stucco finish.
Italianate: Two-story massing with vertical and horizontal breaks. and third story addition
for variation within tract, 4:12 and 5:12 roof pitches, tapered stucco columns, belt course
trim, and arched windows at upper level.
Recommendation: Increase eave to 24 inches and add stuc(:o soffits; specify fine to light
sand stucco finish.
Craftsman: Hardi-board siding with carry over to sides and rear, flat concrete roof tiles,
and entry porches with stone base.
Recommendation: Eliminate third-story element in order to help accentuate side-to-side
width of structure.
Monterey: Wood balcony and railings, 12 inch eaves, round tile attic vents, and window
shutters.
Recommendation: Substitute S-tile with barrel tile roof; substitute stone veneer with brick
painted to match stucco.
.
Landscaping: The proposed lots Harveston Specific Plan permit$ the sideyard setbacks to
be a minimum of four feet. Therefore, it is important that the architectural design and
landscaping provide a visual break between the homes to avoid the appearance of
excessive massing. In this case, the plan has incorporated opposing courtyards on some
model placements to help provide greater building separation.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
01.
(or)
[8J 1.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class,
name, type)
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved EIR and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162
subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). In addition, the City Attorney has
reviewed correspondence received from the Pechanga Cultural Resources on May 12,
2003, and has opined that there is no legal basis to impose additional mitigation
measures beyond those that were approved with the certified EIR for Harveston. The
City Attorney believes that as conditioned, this project is incompliance with CEQA.
.
(or)
KID 1'12003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Report ,"ugh <haft Ashville.doc
.
.
.
01.
An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following
potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigations, staff recommends adoption
of the mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.
CO NCLUSION/RECOMM ENDA TION
Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution approving the application with the following findings
and attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map (Code Section 16.09.140)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal
Code.
Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision
Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code because the project has
been designed for single family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses
specified for this Planning Area in the HaNeston Specific Plan.
The tentative map dOes not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the California land Conservation Act of 1965.
The proposed land division is not land designated for conseNation or agricultural use
and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed
by the tentative map.
The project consists of a 69-lot Tentative Tract Map which includes 60 single family
residential lots and 9 lots for private streets and open space on properly designated for
low-medium density residential use.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land use assumptions of the EIR
prepared for the HaNeston Specific Plan.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building Departments and has been
conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of grading and construction will be
R,\D 1'12003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport rough draft Ashville.doc
8.
inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state and local codes.
.
6.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive (;Ir natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single-
family residences the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building
Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for
energy conservation.
7.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The
Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed
division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the
Tentative Tract Map.
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
The City's parkland dedication requirements are c(;lvered in the Development Agreement
approved with the Harveston Specific Plan and the map provides public access to the
lake park.
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010)
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
.
The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and applicable provisions of the
development code and the Harveston Specific Plan in which the site is located.
The plan will permit the development of 60 single family dwellings at a density of 10.8
dwelling units per acre, which is less than the maximum density of 13 dwelling units per
acre permitted by the Harveston Specific Plan for this area.
The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Medium
Residential and implements the land use goals specified for Planning Area 3 of the
Harveston Specific Plan.
The proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be
detrimental to the public health safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements I the vicinity. \
The homes will be constructed according to the Uniform Building and Fire Codes and will
be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy.
.
R,\D 1"2003\03-0625 A,hvillelStaff Report ,"ugh drnft "'hviUe.doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 8
2.
PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 9
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval Planning Application No. PA03-0227
Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Planning Application No. PA03-0625
R:\D P\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough Waft Ashville.doc
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:ID 1'\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
[}={] ~ [Ri ~ [g ~ lJ (Q) ~
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31276
C~~ (\d)~ 1r~m~<e~~~, C(\d)~ti"ù~ (\d)~ R~'¥'~~~~cdJ~, §~~~~ (\d)~ C~~~~(\d)mü~
~-4-~-
~s 21V ~~,
I
, I
,
"" "I" ""
...f~-1
~--: :r--:'~~
STREET'S: 'A',;'P' 'C' 'D'&'E'
_It~.
J "ì r" f.
ALLEY SECTION
"" r. "'"
r '" -- " J
;---f---'-+=-~-~
"'1H{ .~ .1 ~ ,,-11-"
NEWPORT ROAD
-----...,----
-------
~------
~: :'~::;;;:;:;;è~:'~:::~':::
""'~,
~
VlC:::::V- MAP
- . I -
"1U~-,~,.
BOOTH BAY ROAD
& NEWPORT ROAD
TIT
~~bSI
HARVESTON DRIVE
or-------, ====:].' ""
; " " I
~14" I~~!~
HARVESTDN DRIVE
~û\jf~;;~~~ ~SMES
"'.
~-----
-----.-.-
------.-
---- --.-
----- --
-------
-~"
---- -
==::::-=---"if
-------¡:::::;:5
;;,~p'~;,,;.~o,N
ASSE"'O'S PARC" NUM"".
-,,~..,,-,~. ".."
BAS" OF BEAR"," NO'"
¡Pl~1.~rt~~..j~) ¡¡;~Jf£'7ij.1~:¡¡:
"ENERAL "FORMATION
, """.,~~. ,"m'
, _M ,~ ~ ""W"',..~
, ".~"m '-0
'. mm.,.,. ~"""m -".,. ~""'"m
, _..".~. "'œ"._m.~""'"m
. -
" .,."m""~'~'~"'~""""'.'"'
" ..'"'-~"'-"",-,--"'"
_.n.. .,," Ho. ,~ ,. .,~. "- -,
" '-fl~"'~;;:¡'
:; r;jfJ~;~¡:;::::.~~:~J :,:: :~';;:: :;;:;,;; ',:
<AND USE SUMMARY
="i1'!~.¡.""
"..,.œ "~"m"""'""" .""
¡¡¡:¡¡.'!'"J;:'~:J'" "MM"" i ¡¡¡¡
.""m, '" -,-, '" "
.".,,'" "'".._,."..
""."", ," "-",,.
"'NTATIVE TAACT NO. 31276
APR 19
--'*=~.
~-~~ ,-
P'ann'n" App"c~'an No. 03-am
COVER SHEET
HARVESTON
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 31276
1
¡
. I
I
,
.
",~,
ElEVATION LEGEND
M ~,,~,
S
I n~'~'"
p
CR C"",-
COT. "m~
COL. ,~~",
~
"'C~~_MAP
I
I
~[f"""""o ""..coL"o" O. ~.;:::::~ldf~ l;o~.':1':"~U¡'"
- - "."~,Iu~""", "".". - ,~'."""',"""'..n
c"' n. ~"":';f"¡:'~;~;' ""'::;::: ~,,"::';::::~'~:¡;,
""""""-- . """"h"" ."" ::"::':.~".
TYPlëAL LOT TYPICAL L~R 1 9 2DnJ.
"~"';"r"'- ~'~ on
LEGEND
I
,~~"",un",
~
~ ::.~:;,~~;\~;:~;~;;;~;
GREYSTONE HOMES
""..COUmYCENTEAOANE SUITE'"
TEMECU~. CA"'"
~==
1
0
4----
I
I
'.'.
i
I ~
,
i
i
I
I
I,
! <
0
~!
~
~~
~,
z
0",
¡::ffi
«u
1;;",
-'¡...
"'",
~~
c<
u.
r
Ii
~ê. ! i F~. . ~.' i il ¡
~~~ ¡,. ¡
~¡¡~ ¡
,
Zo ::;
o~ ~~;
'" E-< ~ ~"
'"' rLJ 0- "",
'"' ,~,'" ~z
;:~ - ~~ <0
" :> ,L "...
~ ~~ ~~
0 ."'
<; "~
=:
~
"
if
0
.
,
¡ ~ii~!
i- - ~~ ,,~ ,
,1:, ~~" Ii o' ~
I"I! g. ~.~ I:i~ !A
ILl_,- OW
0
I"
\.
1. ,:,
:~
"
~
¡
I
I
Zo :
OB ~~
'" Eo< ~ ~:c
'" 000- "", .
'" [;oJ >~ ~ z
;:~ :¡~ <0
'" ;>." ;...
~ ,,; ~;::
c .'"
<~ eO:
. to
::c
~
o.¡",
>aJo
~~~
~!;¡~
o..gj~
"'1-0
<en
o.¡
'"
-'
! I
!
l
r
I
\
hk
I
I
"h'.,..",
\r"'f"~
,
If!, .
J~~c --~
.
:q:
LJ:
I
[J
~
u
;¡
0
.
.
.
~~~-=---~ //
===---=-----~~
. ---------- ---------------
LA~E FRO~T
GREES9EL T
.\!TOcm'RI
~~ -------
- -, ==;1 "-
--C.' ' ~ ~
U J /-----,V;-(Ž; ;L:~, \
CONCEPTUAL
PLOT PLAN
ASHVILLF.
AT
.HARVESTON
'I"",.,\\",\IJI',,"H'
ell \SI I
1"'"lll'.C."""R'IA
0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. . ~... .
~ ~ 1 ,~i~ ~~jg ~~~-
g ~ >.j ¡ ~;8~ ~~¡~ .,;§ ~~~~ m~ ~ãji .
¡ I ¡i¡ii!!!! ¡ill ¡Iii II!i JIii III! ¡Iii ¡¡I! I!i! ml
-.~ïi.;.'h;...¡..! ~~m ~.~~~ .." ~~~:~~ .~~.!~ .-.,.¡~I ~i:!.~..,.¡~.P¡.<.~.! ¡e.'.o;.,~
..: .<C' "" m, !!I! )II! 'm 1'" -;, . ,," ",¡
1"tÓ~S1" -h. ~iW mE ~~i~ ~I;~' â". ><';
_. "" ::'0 ,,:: '°"" ~"~: :::, ~,¡¡! 1m m¡
0"
~~ !r~ ~
~ ~ :1 ~.!
gS~ ¡1.!§lrÏf ¡
-':~I-
,.
I
II II I :e 18
0
z
o~ ~~
.. Eo< ~ ~o
',. 3 I:I)~- ,=
: >~f;¡;J~~ ~~
! = >" <0
~ ø::~. ;...
ó ~~
-< ~ ~..
=" .~
0
.
.
.
:J
~
..J
~
æ
~
"
ß
v
.1 Ii!
~-----
I ' j
I~ ~ 1
~
0
-0
~~~ 11-1
g~~ I!§¡
-,¡~J
:z: 0 "'
o~ <'"
'" E--~ ~~
j Cf)~- ~=
>~f;!J;~ ~~
;. >~~ .¿ô
~ ~ ~ ~g
:=; ~~
~-
. .
"
~ ~,-c
o~
0
0
0
~
...
g¡
¡;:
., I' e-..-,
Il'~ H I
- ~ I~
g ',,81
.. IL~J
.
,-,
;~
-'
'~
.~
Zc '"
O~ ..
~ ;;::£
'" ¡..~ ~o
~~:~; ~;
~ > ~~ :;0
< ~: ~~
<~ ~;:;'
=~ "~
.
I~"~-
Ii /-
\ // "
L¿- :_'
~
.~
I :I
Q
I ~
,i"
~ v-
'1
.
0
0
.
.
.
D
-'
'"
>-
'"
..J
l-
V)
~
---l
----:;;¡ _1
-.,.
I
I
L'è.
___i
I
I
, i '"
I ~
I ,j:':.
-I Jz!"
..,.,
..- õ:
~
'"
-'
"
z
p
~
!~
rY
¡L-
-\H !
--;1 Jl'
JJ
n
i!¡! i',
~., ,"
:3~~ :! i.-
'1'-
JU. h !t
Zo V)
o~ ~;
'" ¡..~ ~o
~ oo~- ~::
;~~::; ~~
:: ......~~ .¿õ
V) ....- <" ~ I-
< ~i ~~
== ~ <;
I
I
- ~r: \
~..-I I I
'oL i
I
0
D
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO.2004 -
R:ID 1'12003103-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING
APPLICATION NO. PA03-0227 AND PA03-0625, A
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TIM 31276) TO SUBDIVIDE
4.28 ACRES INTO SIXTY (60) SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL LOTS AVERAGING 3,000 SQUARE
FEET, AND A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVING THE
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF
SIXTY (60) HOMES WITHIN THE TRACT ("ASHVILLE"),
LOCATED IN PLANNING AREA 3 OF THE HARVESTON
SPECIFIC PLAN.
WHEREAS, Greystone Homes filed Planning Application No, PA03-0227 and PA03-
0625 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan,
Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on May 5, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Tentative Tract Map Findinas. That the Planning Commission, in
approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140
of the Temecula Municipal Code.
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal
Code.
Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision
Ordinance, the Development Code, and the Municipal Code because the project has
been designed for single family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses
specified for this Planning Area in the Harveston Specific Plan.
R,\D 1'\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
10
I
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land, hich is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 19 5. I
The proposed land division is not land designated for cons Nation or agricultural use
and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contra ts. I
¡
.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and prop sed density of development
proposed by the tentative map. I
I
The project consists of a 69-lot Tentative Tract Map whic includes 60 single family
residential lots and 9 lots for private streets and open space on property designated for
low-medium density residential use.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed impr vements, with conditions of
approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental da age or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. :
The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land yse assumptions of the EIR
prepared for the HaNeston Specific Plan. I
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems. ~
The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building epartments and has been
conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of gradl g.and construction will be
inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state a d local codes.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future PtSSive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive r natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior. 0 the construction of single-
family residences the applicant will be required to submit t)uilding plans to the Building
Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, ~hich contains requirements
for energy conseNation. I
I '
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improyements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through 01 use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been pro ided on the Tentative Map.
The Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the
proposed division of land and adequate conditions and/or mbdifications have been made
to the Tentative Tract Map. I :
H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkl¡p.ndl dedication requirements
(Quimby). I ,
The City's parkland dedication requirements are covered in the De lelopment Agreement
approved with the Harveston Specific Plan and the map provides PfbliÇ access to the lake park.
Section 3. Development Plan Findinas. That the Plannirg Commission, in approving
the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required: in Section 17.05.010 of the
Temecula Municipal Code. I
RI\D P\2003\O3.Q625 Ashville\StaffReport wugh dnlft Ashville.doc
11
.
.
.
.
.
A. The proposed project is consistent with the objectives and applicable provisions
of the development code and the Harveston Specific Plan in which the site is located.
The plan will permit the development of 60 single family dwellings at a density of 10.8
dwelling units per acre, which is less than the maximum density of 13 dwelling units per
acre permitted by the Harveston Specific Plan for this area.
B. The proposed project is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of
Medium Residential and implements the land use goals specified for Planning Area 3 of the
Harveston Specific Plan.
C. The proposed project together with the conditions applicable thereto will not be
detrimental to the public health safety, or welfare or materially injurious to properties or
improvements I the vicinity.
Section 4. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined
to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan (EIR) and is exempt from
further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations).
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the application (PA 03-0227 and PA03-0625) a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 31276) and
Development Plan for the lot creation, and architectural design and placement of sixty (60)
single family residences in Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan for all of the
foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A and
Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all
other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 5th day of May 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:ID P\2oo3\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
12
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Co mission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by he IPlanning Commission of
the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5t day of May 2004, by the
fu~~~ I
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
I
R,ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshviUe\Staff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc
13
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA03-0227
(Tentative Tract Map 31276)
R:ID P\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
14
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-00227
(Tentative Tract Map 31276)
Project Description:
Tentative Tract Map No. 31276 ("Ashville")
subdividing 4.28 acres into sixty (60) single-
family residential lots averaging 3,000 square
feet generally located north of Harveston
Lake, west of Loop Drive, and east of the
Lakefront Cottages tract within Planning Area
3 of the Harveston Specific Plan area; known
as Assessors Parcel No. 911-180-02, 03, 04
and 015.
DIF Category:
MSHCP Category:
Per the Development Agreement
TUMF Fee:
Single Family Residential
Single Family Residential
Approval Date:
May 5,2004
Expiration Date:
May 5, 2007
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
1.
The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of One thousand three hundred and
fourteen dollars ($1314,00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file
the Notice of Determination required under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b)
and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour
period the applicant has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
[Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
RID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc
15
3.
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and age ts.City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, ~ proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in th defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City de ms to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of Ca ifo~nia Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accord nce with the State Map Act
and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days p iorto the expiration date.
4.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this ondition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City wit I Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetarr damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the ap,proval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appefl board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be dêemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or !appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agehts. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, çr proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deJms to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. I
If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasina plan shall b~ submitted to and approved
by the Planning Director. I
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approvad Exhibit "B" (Conceptual
Landscape Plan) on file in the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the
project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable i¡>atisfaction of the Director of
Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not bein,g maintained, the Director of
Planning shall have the authority to require the property oWner to bring the landscaping
into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The çontinued maintenance of all
landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the devêloper or any successors in
interest.
5.
6.
7.
,
The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring; Program for the Harveston
Specific Plan and contained on file in the Planning Deparmtent.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the !site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the pro~erty owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all turther excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to depos\t a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or a~thorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. '
8.
R,\D 1'12003\03-0625 AshviUe\Staff Report rough drnft AshviUe.doc
16
.
.
.
.
Upon determining that the determination is not an archaeological/cultural resource, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeologicaVcultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
9.
10.
11.
12.
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Division.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
13.
.
.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department:
a. A copy of the Final Map.
b. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) applicable for
the tract.
CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all
buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been
formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly
owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas
and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be
sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to
control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of
the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's
which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or
dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of
maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit
enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval.
The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement
to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This
condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes,
Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to
such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common
areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting
membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities.
Ii.
Iii.
R,ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough <haft Ashville.doc
17
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the t ntative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constr ints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubm tted for further review and
œ~~ I
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading ¡all be obtained from the
Department of Public Works prior to commencement of an construction outside of the
City-maintained road right-of-way. ,
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Depart en.,t of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or pro osed City right-of-way.
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with
adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguou~ to the site and shall be
submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. {
The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Condition of Approval for Harveston
Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99-0418) as approved on August 1 ,2001.
The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of!Approval for Tentative Tract
Map No. 29639(PAOO-0295) as approved on August 14, 2001.
¡
Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indi¡cated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved¡ subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted: ¡
I
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works,¡ the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies: ¡
a. San Diego Regional WaterQuality Control Board I
b. Rancho California Water District I
c. Eastern Municipal Water District I
d. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
I
City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Riverside County Health Department
Cable TV Franchise
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.
I.
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
m.
KID P\2003\03.0625 AshvillelStaff Report mugh draft Ashville.doc
18
.
.
.
. 21.
22.
23.
24,
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
.
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the
design of the street improvement plans:
Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207, 207A and/or 208.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance
with Specific Plan Standards.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400 and
401 or as modified in the Specific Plan.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
All knuckles shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 602.
All cul-de-sacs shall be constructed in accordance with City Standards No. 600.
All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if
the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be
provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-
of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and
constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Harveston Drive on the Final Map.
Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Newport Road on the Final Map with
the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
Relinquish and waive rights of access to and from Booth Bay Road on the Final Map
with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or
abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
36.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the
map. A copy of the ECS shall be transmitted to the Planning Department for review and
approval.
37.
R,ID P\2003\03-0625 AshviUelStaff Report rough draft AshviUe.doc
19
38.
39.
40.
41.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any unde lying maps related to the
subject property. I
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchise of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of st eet improvements.
I
Easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be dedicated to the City where sidewalks
meander through private property.
.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, lands ape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if the~ are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveya1ces shall be submitted for
review and recorded as directed by the Department of Pub ic Works. On-site drainage
facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage
easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating,
"drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. "
I
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
42.
43.
44.
45.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies: '
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conserva ion District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
.
46.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards and approved by the Departmelj1t of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorpor~te adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from drmage due to erosion.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading ~an check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and preliminary pave ent sections.
I
A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Ergineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of
the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site ¡or on-site, public or private,
drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runpff shall be conveyed to an
adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runotr without damage to public or
private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of
all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the
storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for
analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interVal of one hundred years.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the ¡National Pollutant DiSCharge.
R,ID NO03\o3.0625 MhvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc
20
.
.
.
47.
48.
49.
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work
performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other drainage lot.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Prior to the first building permit, Final Map 31276 shall be approved and recorded.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report
addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in
substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and
Developer dated August 28, 2001.
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
55.
56.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
R:\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drafr Ashville.doc
2t
57.
,
I
I
All improvements shall be constructed and completed per t e approved plans and City
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
58. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall bt repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. I
FIRE DEPARTMENT I
59. Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full
force and effect unless superceded by more stringent reqUir,m~nts here.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be b1ed on occupancy. use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CF ). and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
61. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land
division per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The devl3loper shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM ¡¡t 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow rj'lay be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction, type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention ßureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A)
60.
,
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire: hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" Xi 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent pub ic streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be Idcated no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix
III-B) I
I
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum ~ire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The de~eloper shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow /nay be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention ,Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provi<¡Jed. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A) ¡
I
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 47 x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be Idcated no more than 210 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Department access rqad(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of e><istir(1ire ~ rraybe required. (CFC 9032, 903.42, ï A:perdx III-B)
R,\D 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport rough draft Ashville.doc !
62.
63.
64.
22
.
.
.
.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
.
71.
72.
73.
74.
.
All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on
a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii.
Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed
travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible
provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on
each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular
road.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal
roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access
must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a
separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than
35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
R,\D P\2003\03-Q625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
23
75.
76.
I
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or buil ing final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. ( F([; 901.4.3)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Depart ent access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provid d "Yith the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CF 902.4)
I
i
I
Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to th Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) igital version of the map
including parcel and street centerline information. The electr nic file will be provided in a
ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected n a State Plane NAD 83
(California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau ust' accept the data as to
completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of th s ciondition.
Special Conditions
77.
78.
Any existing water system in support of hydrants or fire sp~inkler systems that was
installed as a common system serving the property that w II now be divided into more
than one parcel will be the responsibility of ALL PARCELS and will be maintained and
repaired by ALL PARCELS in perpetuity.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
I
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid aste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul c01struction debris.
All areas intended for dedication to the TCSD for maintenan?e shall be identified on the
final map by numbered lot and indexed to identify said lot number as proposed TCSD
maintenance area. i
All private streets, alleys as well as the parkways within thelright of ways along Newport
and Booth Bay Roads, residential streetlights on private strøets, open space, pedestrian
access areas, monumentation and fencing shall be maintai~ed by an established Home
Owner's Association. i
I
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits I
85. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrange~ents made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
Prior to issuance of building permit or the installation of additional street lighting to be
maintained by TCSD, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD
application process, submit the approved Edison streetlighti improvement plans and pay
the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD
maintenance program. I
i
!
82.
83.
84.
86.
R,\D P\2003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
24
.
.
.
.
.
.
Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
87.
It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of
the TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers.
88.
The developer or his assignee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the
most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
89.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the
above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained
in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to
make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
RID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
25
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PAO3-0625
(Development Plan)
R:\D P\2003\O3-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough draft Ashville.doc
26
.
.
.
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No. PA03-0625 (Development Plan)
Project Description:
A Development Plan to approve the architectural
design and placement of sixty (60) single family
residences located within Tract 31276 ("Ashville"),
generally located north of Harveston Lake, west of
Loop Drive, and east of the Lakefront Cottages tract
within Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan.
DIF:
TUMPF:
Per Development Agreement
MSHCP:
Per Development Agreement
Single Family Residential
Approval Date:
May 5, 2004
May 5,2006
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project
granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c).
General Requirements
2.
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from
any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application
which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public
Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the
way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City shall promptly notify the
R:\D /'\2003\03-0625 Ashville\Staff Repon rough draft Ashville.doc
27
3.
,
I
I
permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding br ught forth within this time
period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of th action and applicant shall
deposit said amount with the City. City may require a. ditional deposits to cover
anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any un~sed portions of the deposit
once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fai;to either promptly notify or
cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter b responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or in trumentality thereof, or any
of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fa/I to timely post the required
deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval t'thout further notice to the
applicant.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the appr val date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period. hich is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion or the beginning of substantial utililation contemplated by this
approval.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the a. proved Exhibits, including
elevations, floor plans, landscaping plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan, contained
on file with the Planning Department or as amended by theS¡ changes.
The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to
the approved colors and materials contained on file with the Planning Department. Any
deviation from the approved colors and materials shall requi(e approval of the Director of
Planning. !
I
This approval is for product review only and shall in no: way limit the city or other
regulatory or service agencies from applying additional req~irements and/or conditions
consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the, review of grading, building
and other necessary permits and approvals for the project. I
: :
The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior
dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on th~ plans prior to the issuance
of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are rreasured from the inside of
garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipmen~ pedestals, bollards or any
similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is morr than 8" above the garage
floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edpe of the stem wall.
Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before constructibn, including Encroachment
Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and
Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department. I
I
Fire Hydrants shall be installed prior to the start of any construction at the site.
I
Driveway widths shall comply with the driveway width requirements per City Standards.
In order to allow for adequate street parking, the driveway widths at curbs will be limited
to 24' maximum. i
.
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
.
R,\D 1',2003\03-0625 Ashville\StaffReport <Dugh <haft Ashville.doc
28
.
.
.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
12.
The applicant shall submit a Grading Plan, subject to the review and approval of the
Planning Department.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X
10" glossy photographic color prints of the Color and Materials Boards and of the colored
version of the approved colored architectural elevations to the Planning Department for
their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable
on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13.
14.
15.
Any optional exterior treatments such as garage doors or front doors shall be shown on
the construction plans and be subject to Planning Department review and approval.
The construction plans shall indicate the following:
a. Cottage: Window-paned garage door as standard on Lots 35, 29, 9, and 6; Light
to Medium sand finish or light lace stucco
Prairie: Fine to Light sand finish stucco
Italianate: 24-inch eaves; stucco soffits; and Fine to Light sand stucco finish
Craftsman:Eliminate third-story
Monterey: Barrel tile roof; brick veneer painted to match stucco
b.
c.
d.
e.
16.
The applicant shall comply with standards conditions and requirements set forth in the
Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, conditions of approval for
PAOO-0295 (Tract 29639), the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula
and Harveston Specific Plan.
17.
The applicant shall submit mailbox elevations and a plot plan clearly indicating the
location of each mailbox area. Mailbox type and location shall be subject to the approval
of the Postmaster and Planning Director.
18.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be submitted to
the Planning Department for approval. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Attachment 1, or as amended by any other related conditions. The location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown, The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The cover page shall identify the
total square footage of the landscaped area for the site. Additionally, the following
revisions shall be made to the landscape construction drawings prior to issuance of
building permits:
Prior to construction of the Model Home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model
Home complex permit.
19,
R:ID 1'\2003\03-0625 AshvillelStaffReport cough draft Ashville.doc
29
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough raping plans, plotting plan,
structural setback measurements shall be submitted and ap roved.
The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director th t ail homes will have double
paned windows with at least a 25 STC rating installed to rekluce noise from occasional
aircraft over flights.
I
I
The developer shall provide proof that construction debris, including but not limited to
lumber, asphalt, concrete, sand, paper and metal is recyc ed, through the City's solid
waste hauler, subject to the approval of the Community Serv ce~ Department.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisio s bf the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing, Mechanical and Fire Code; 1998 National Electrical
Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and isabled Access Regulations
and the Temecula Municipal Code. .
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior 0 commencement of any
construction work.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the biliilding inspector prior to
commencement of any construction or inspections. I
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional witl' original signature on plans
and structural calculations submitted for plan review.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel ~chedule for plan review.
Schematic plumbing plans, electrical plan and load calcula~ions, along with mechanical
equipment and ducting plans shall be submitted for plan review stamped and original
signed by an appropriate registered professional. I
I '
Obtain street addresses from the Building Official prior tol submittal of plans for plan
review. I
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to ~he project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by City of Temecula Ordinance No. 94-
21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside county Ordina~ce No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. !
i
Monday-Friday: 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m. :
Saturday: 7:00 a.m.- 6:30 p.m. I
No work is permitted on Sunday or Governmtnt Holidays
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
31. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have b en installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of wee<ils, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
I
Ro\D 1'\2003\03-0625 "'hvillelStaff Report mugh draft A,hville.doc
30
.
.
.
.
.
.
32.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for
one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and
irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the applicant shall release the bond upon request.
33.
If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
34.
Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping and fencing within individual lots shall be
completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model
home complex structures).
35.
The developer shall submit proof that all local refuse generators have been provided
with written information about opportunities for recycling and waste reduction (i.e.
buyback centers, curbside availability), subject to the approval of the Public Works and
Community Services Departments.
36.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Planning Commission approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R,IJ) P'\2003\O3-0625 AshvillelStaff Report rough drnft Ashville.doc
31