HomeMy WebLinkAbout060804 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (909) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
JUNE 8, 2004 — 7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER:
Prelude Music:
Flag Ceremony:
Invocation:
ROLL CALL:
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2004-06
Resolution: No. 2004-58
Mayor Mike Naggar
Ryan Sanford
Councilman Roberts
Reverend Jerry Hangen of Grace Presbyterian Church
Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, Naggar
R:1Agenda\060804
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
Export Council Presentation
Certificate of Achievement to Jordan Price for attaining Eagle Scout rank
Certificate of Achievement to Chase Benson for attaining Eagle Scout rank
Certificate of Achievement to Joshua Bishop for attaining Eagle Scout rank
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink 'Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prlor to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 2004.
R:Wgenda\060804
Resolution approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's report as of April 30, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET
CLOSURES FOR THE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND
AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT
FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT
6 Authorize Temporary Street Closure of Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road and
Second Street: Main Street from the Bridge to Old Town Front Street: Second Street:
Engineer
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RAAgendak060804
7
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE
OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET BETWEEN MORENO ROAD
AND SECOND STREET; MAIN STREET FROM THE BRIDGE
TO OLD TOWN FRONT STREET; SECOND STREET; THIRD
STREET; FOURTH STREET; FIFTH STREET; SIXTH STREET;
AND MERCEDES STREET BETWEEN MORENO ROAD AND
SECOND STREET FOR THE "STAR SPANGLED 4T" OF JULY
PARADE" AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTORS OF PUBLIC
WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS
PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE
OF PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ
ROAD FOR THE "JULY 4T" 2004, FIREWORKS SHOW", AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING
STREET CLOSURES
Parcel Map No. 31821 located on the south side of Remington Avenue, approximatelv
nine hundred (900) feet west of Diaz Road
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Parcel Map No. 31821 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval.
8.2 Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for
the agreement.
Assessment District 03-04 (John Warner Road) Street and Storm Drain Improvement
Project — Project No. PW02-07 - Increase Construction Contingency
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Appropriate $260,000 in General Fund Capital Project Reserves to fund the Rancho
California Water District (RCWD) facility relocation portion of the John Warner Road
Improvement Project;
RAAgenda\060804
9.2 Appropriate $280,000 in General Fund Capital Project Reserves to fully fund the
Assessment District 03-04 (John Warner Road) Street and Storm Drain
Improvement Project — Project No. PW02-07;
9.3 Increase the project contingency and the City Manager's contract change order
approval limit by $200,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency.
10 FY2003/2004 Year End CIP Project Account Reconciliation Administrative and Legal Fees
11
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Appropriate $60,000 to the Rancho California Road Widening and Median
Modifications East of Ynez project from General Fund Capital Project Reserves;
10.2 Appropriate $85,000 to the Diaz Road Realignment project from General Fund
Capital Project Reserves.
RECOMMENDATION:
11.1 Approve Tract Map No. 29798-8 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
11.2 Approve Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
11.3 Approve Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance
Bond, Labor and Material Bond, and Monument bond as security for the
agreements.
12 Resolution Adopting FY 2004-2005 Solid Waste Rates
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
13 Implementation of Special Tax — Measure C
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RMgenda\060804
5
14
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL
TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005 TO PROVIDE FOR
RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE
OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC
PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN
LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Approve an agreement with Converse Consultants in an amount not to exceed
$33,075.00 to provide, as needed, geotechnical and material testing services for the
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Phase II, Project 02-26, and authorize
the Mayor to execute the agreement.
14.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed
the contingency amount of $3,307.50, which is equal to 10% of the agreement
amount.
15 Opposition of Assembly Bill 2162 (Oropeza) relating to Indian Gaming
RECOMMENDATION:
15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 2162 (OROPEZA)
WHICH PROPOSES TO ADD SPECIAL DISTRICTS TO THE
SIXTY -PERCENT NEXUS GRANT CATEGORY ESTABLISHED
IN SENATE BILL 621
16 Purchase of Defibrillators and Paramedic Medical Supplies
RECOMMENDATION:
16.1 Authorize the City Manager to purchase an additional $8,000 of Paramedic supplies
from Life Assist in Fiscal Year 2003-04;
16.2 Authorize the expenditure to purchase four defibrillators for a total cost of $88,000
from Zoll in Fiscal Year 2004-05;
16.3 Authorize the expenditure to purchase general Paramedic medical supplies from
Life Assist for an annual amount $38,500 in Fiscal Year 2004-05.
R:\Hgenda\060804
17 Fifth Amendment to the Contract to update the City General Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
17.1 Approve contract Amendment No. 5 in the amount of $23,026 and authorize the City
Manager to sign the amendment to the contract with Cotton Bridges Associates.
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:\Agenda\060804
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2004-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2004-05
CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 25, 2004.
HVAC Preventative Maintenance Service Contract for all City Facilities
�Kelulul_ ► � _ •
2.1 Award a twelve-month contract to Southcoast Heating and Air Conditioning
Service for a total amount of $65,000.00, effective July 1, 2004.
R:\Hgenda\060804
Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement Areas into
Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2004-2005
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B FOR
PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES FOR
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR
2004-2005
3.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING
CERTAIN SLOPE AND LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT
MAP NO. 23209, CROWNE HILL AND HARVESTON
DEVELOPMENTS INTO SERVICE LEVEL C FOR
MAINTENANCE PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2004-
2005
3.3 Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement
documents.
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the Temecula Community Services District
before a public hearing or may appear and may be heard in support of or in opposition to
the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the
project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
4 TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2004-2005
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:\Hgenda\060804
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B —
RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C —
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D —
REFUSE AND RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
4.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R — ROAD
MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Review and Adoption of the FY2004-2005 Annual Operating Budget
A90101&IIT, hN -IT-yt reffiq
2.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 22, 2004, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R1Ngenda\060804
10
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2004-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2004-07
Chairperson Jeff Comerchero
AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington,
Comerchero
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 25, 2004.
AGENCY BUSINESS
Review and Adoption of the FY2004-2005 Annual Operating Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1
Adopt a resolution entitled:
R:Wgenda\060804
11
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
3 Review and Adoption of the FY2005-2009 Capital Improvement Budget for the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY
2005-09 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
BUDGET FOR FY2004-05
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, June 22, 2004, 7:00 PM City Council Chambers, 43200 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:Wgenda\060804
12
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
PUBLIC HEARING
Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or
may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s)
at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or
in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing.
18 Art in Public Places Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION:
18.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO.04-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 5.08 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
COUNCIL BUSINESS
19 Review and Adoption of FY2004-2005 Annual Operating Budget
RECOMMENDATION:
19.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
19.2 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
19.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FOR 2004-05
R:\Agenda\060804
13
20 Review and Adoption of FY2005-2009 Capital Improvement Budget Program
RECOMMENDATION:
20.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FOR FY2005-09 AND ADOPTING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY2004-05
21 Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment
RECOMMENDATION:
21.1 Appoint one applicant to serve on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission for an
unexpired term through October 10, 2005.
22 Planning Commission Appointments
RECOMMENDATION:
22.1 Appoint two applicants to serve on the Planning Commission for full three-year
terms through June 4, 2007.
23 Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
RECOMMENDATION:
23.1 Appoint two members to serve on the Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular City Council meeting, Tuesday, June 22, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
R:\Agenda\060804
14
PROCLAMATIONS
►9
PRESENTATIONS
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF
THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
MAY 11, 2004
The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and in Open Session at 7:00 P.M.,
on Tuesday, May 11, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Present: 5 Councilmembers:
Absent: 0 Councilmember:
PRELUDE MUSIC
Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and
Naggar
None
The prelude music was provided by Eve Craig.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Father Timothy Robinson of St. Nicholas Orthodox.
ALLEGIANCE
The flag ceremony was presented by Cub Scout Pack No. 148.
PRESENTATION/PROCLAMATIONS
Certificate of Appreciation to Public Traffic Safety Commissioner Katan
Thanking Mr. Katan for his years of service to the community, Mayor Naggar presented a
Certificate of Achievement to Mr. Katan who expressed his appreciation for having had the
opportunity to serve the community.
Mental Health Month Proclamation
With appreciation and on behalf of the Board, Mr. Marlin Harrison, Mid County Region Mental
Health Board Member, accepted the proclamation.
Water Awareness Month Proclamation
Advising that the month of May is Water Awareness Month, Ms. Melanie Nieman, Director of
Community Involvement for Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD), encouraged the public to
use water in a more wisely manner.
Councilman Stone requested an EMWD presentation providing its perspective as to future
availability of water and the potential changes of distribution sources of water.
National Public Works Week Proclamation
Accepting the proclamation, Public Works Director Hughes thanked the City Council for this
proclamation and as well thanked his capable staff for their continued efforts.
R:\Minutes\052504 1
Mayor Naggar commended the Public Works Department on a job well done with Councilman
Stone stating that Public Works Director Hughes is the finest Public Works Director this City has
employed, bringing with him an unbelievable knowledge.
Film Festival Marketing Video
Mr. Terry O'Brien, representing the Film Festival, thanked the City for its continued support; advised
that this year will be the Festival's 10'h anniversary; commented on event activities; shared the
marketing video; and noted that this year's Festival will be September 8 — 12, 2004.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A. Mr. Wayne Hall, 42131 Agena, representing the Veterans of Foreign War, apprised the
City Council and the public of the upcoming Memorial Day Ceremony at the cemetery off
Santiago Road, on Monday, May 31, 2004, at 10:00 A.M., noting that a celebration of
remembrance will be hosted at the Veterans' Center immediately after the ceremony at the
Western Eagle Foundation.
B. Ms. Debbie Woolley and Mr. Joshua Larsen, representing Chaparral High School Club
Chaparral Robotic Engineers and Techno Explorers (C.R.E.A.T.E.), informed the public of the
Club's participation in the National Robotic Competition; advised that this year they will be
building a solar -powered boat for the Metropolitan Water District Solar Cup Challenge for high
school students at Lake Skinner; thanked Rancho California Water District, Eastern Municipal
Water District, and Mayor Naggar for their support; and extended an invitation to the Council
and the public to the May 21 -23, 2004 event.
At this time, Mr. Larsen provided a more detailed overview of the solar -powered boat
project.
Mayor Naggar encouraged public participation.
C. Mr. John Dedovesh, 39450 Long Ridge Drive, commented on the following
• Aesthetically displeasing appearance of signs being posted on poles, stop signs, etc.
and recommended that fines be imposed if not removed
• City should consider annexing the area on the south side of Winchester Road to the
airport
• Pechanga Casino should provide financial assistance with proposed road
improvements such as the Interstate 15 interchange
• Continued abuse of red light running.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. As a Theater Foundation Board Member, Councilman Washington apprised the public of
an upcoming golf tournament fundraiser in Las Vegas, noting that spots are still available.
B. Having had the pleasure and honor to celebrate the 10'" Anniversary of the City's Sister
City relationship with the City of Voorburg, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero presented to the City of
Temecula a 10v' Anniversary statue which was presented to Councilman Roberts and him while
visiting the City of Voorburg.
RAMinutes\052504
C. During his recent trip to the City of Voorburg, Councilman Roberts advised that he had
taken a lot of pictures which will be posted on the City's website.
Advising that he has been elected as the President of Southern California Association of
Governments (SCAG), Councilman Roberts provided a brief overview of the efforts of this
metropolitan planning organization.
Commenting on the availability of $3.6 million, Mr. Roberts, as a member of the Local
Indian Gaming Committee, noted that a determination as to the distribution of these available
funds will be made in the near future and advised that such funds are to be utilized to mitigate
City impacts as a result of Indian Gaming, stating that the following distributions will be
recommended:
• Interchange 15/lower SR 79 improvements - $1.6 million
• County Sheriff's Department - $541,000
for additional enforcement in the County areas
• Wolf Creek Fire Station - $496,000 first year
• Dedicated ambulance and emergency staff
at Pechanga Casino
In closing, Councilman Roberts advised that the Local Coalition will be meeting with the
Governor on May 12, 2004, in Sacramento, to discuss budget impacts and the Governor's
proposed efforts for a constitutional amendment to prohibit the State from impacting cities'
budgets.
D. Councilman Stone congratulated Mr. Roberts on his election as Chairman to the SCAG.
In response to Mr. Stone who had expressed concern with the Governor's ability to
convince the Legislature to approve the passage of a constitutional amendment to prohibit the
State from impacting cities' budgets, Councilman Roberts provided some clarification of the
proposed initiative.
E. Echoing Mr. Stone's congratulation to Mr. Roberts, Mayor Naggar commented on the
recent State of the City address and advised that it will be rebroadcast on May 18 and May 25,
2004 at 5:30 P.M. on Channel 28.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the minutes of April 13, 2004;
2.2 Approve the minutes of April 20, 2004.
R:\Minutes\052504
3 Resolution approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-47
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4 City Treasurer's Report
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of March 31, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 0448
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ORDERING ACTION TO TRANSMIT TO THE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE DOCUMENTS NECESSARY TO
CREDIT THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TAX COLLECTOR
UPON THE TAX ROLL AND TO RELIEVE THE TAX
COLLECTOR OF FURTHER DUTY THERETO IN COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 88-12 AS REQUIRED BY LAW;
ORDERING ACTIONS TO FORECLOSE THE DELINQUENT
SPECIAL TAX LIENS; AND ORDERING THE RECORDATION
OF A NOTICE OF INTENT TO REMOVE DELINQUENT
SPECIAL TAX INSTALLMENTS FROM THE TAX ROLL
Street Name Change from Stanko Circle to Castle Court
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
Ift*Y6Il4111*]�Nil [owl 1 �i*
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA CHANGING THE STREET NAME FROM STANKO
CIRCLE TO CASTLE COURT
R:\Minutes\052504
7 Parking Restrictions — Westside Business Park
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-50
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING: A NO PARKING ZONE ON DENDY
PARKWAY, REMINGTON AVENUE, VIA INDUSTRIA, ROICK
DRIVE, COLT COURT, AND BOSTIK COURT AS SHOWN ON
EXHIBIT A; AND A NO PARKING MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY
ZONE ON ZEVO DRIVE AS SHOW ON EXHIBIT A
Roripaugh Ranch Open Space Grading and Restoration Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Approve the Open Space Grading and Restoration Agreement for the Roripaugh
Ranch Project and accept the surety bonds from Ashby USA, LLC.
Winchester Road Widening — Proiect No. PW00-27 — Acquisition Agreement — BP West
Coast Products, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute in substantially the form attached
hereto, the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Temecula and BP
West Coast Products, LLC for the acquisition of certain real property in the amount
of $92,000.00 plus the associated escrow fees;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the document;
9.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN OR EASEMENT UPON REAL ESTATE AS
PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281
(Pulled for separate discussion; see page 7.)
R:\Minutes\052504
10 Community Theater — Project No. PW02-23 —
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Approve and authorize the City Manager to execute in substantially the form
attached hereto, the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Temecula
and Michael Butler -Grass Valley Associates for the acquisition of certain real
property in the amount of $16,000.00 plus the associated escrow fees;
10.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the document;
10.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-52
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN OR EASEMENT UPON REAL ESTATE AS
PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281
11 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-04 (Grading, Erosion. and Sediment Control)
11.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 04-04
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA,
ADDING TITLE 18 TO THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO GRADING, EROSION, AND SEDIMENT
CONTROL, AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE A GRADING MANUAL
SETTING FORTH THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES AND
TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY TO IMPLEMENT
THIS ORDINANCE
12 Second Reading of Ordinance No. 04-05 (PERS)
RECOMMENDATION:
12.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 04-05
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE
BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFORNIA PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEMS (PERS) AND THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RAMinutesl052504
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-8 and 10-12. (Item
No. 9 was pulled for separate discussion; see below.) Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero seconded
the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
CONSENT CALENDAR CONSIDERED UNDER SEPARATE DISCUSSION
9 Winchester Road Widening — Proiect No. PW00-27 — Acquisition Agreement — BP West
Coast Products, LLC
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Approve and authorize the Mayor to execute in substantially the form attached
hereto, the Purchase and Sale Agreement between the City of Temecula and BP
West Coast Products, LLC for the acquisition of certain real property in the
amount of $92,000.00 plus the associated escrow fees;
9.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the document;
9.3 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-51
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO ACCEPT DEEDS OR GRANTS CONVEYING ANY
INTEREST IN OR EASEMENT UPON REAL ESTATE AS
PERMITTED BY GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 27281
Public Works Director Hughes presented an overview of the proposed project (as per agenda
material).
MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item No. 9. Mayor Pro Tern
Comerchero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At 7:57 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 8:04 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business.
COUNCIL BUSINESS
13 Winchester Road Widening — Jefferson Avenue Medians — Proiect No. PW00-27
RECOMMENDATION:
13.1 Receive and file status update for the construction of the median on Jefferson
Avenue, north of Winchester Road as presented by staff at the April 20, 2004
meeting.
Public Works Director Hughes reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material) and referenced
the traffic study completed by the property owners, relaying the owners' comments as follows:
That the completed traffic study was consistent with staffs recommendation
RAMinutes\052504
• That additional turning movements (U-turns) be requested for the redirected left-hand
turn out movements from the driveways
• That additional turning movements be requested at the north driveway near Richie's
as well as at Sanborn Avenue and Jefferson Road
• That redirection of those trips would further impact the congestion at these
intersections
• That dual left -turn movements at Winchester and Jefferson Roads would be
recommended to further mitigate a portion of this congestion
• That a traffic signal be installed at Sanborn and Jefferson Avenues in conjunction with
this project.
In response to Councilman Roberts, Public Works Director Hughes confirmed that larger
vehicles, traveling southbound, may have a more difficult time maneuvering the U-turn
movements. Mr. Hughes as well indicated that staff could foresee the installation of a traffic
signal at Sanborn and Jefferson Avenues at some future date. Although the installation of a
traffic signal has been placed in the Capital Improvement Program, Mr. Hughes advised that it
would not be installed in conjunction with the proposed project.
Impressed with the City's leadership, Mr. Jack Williams, representing Richie's Dinner, 41640
Yorba Road, stated that he and his wife are proud to own a business in the City of Temecula.
With regard to the proposed project, Mr: Williams confirmed that the completed traffic study is
consistent with staff's recommendation; noted that safety must be the number one priority; and
requested that a traffic signal be installed at Sanborn Avenue in conjunction with the proposed
project to ensure the viability of the existing businesses.
Concurring that the completed traffic study does confirm the proposed staff recommendation,
Ms. Carlene Anderson, 41623 Margarita Road, representing Winchester/Jefferson Plaza,
requested, as per the study, the installation of a traffic signal at Sanborn and Jefferson Avenues
and noted that the study had as well recommended the installation of a traffic light at Richie's
Diner driveway; and requested the installation of additional signage to assist customer direction
as access point change. Ms. Anderson relayed the property owners' desire to continue working
with the Public Works Department staff with regard to the design of the Jefferson median.
Distributing to the City Council a letter from Ms. Judith Burns, Mr. Larry Markham, 41635
Enterprise Circle, also commented on the inclusion of the traffic signal at Sanborn and Jefferson
Avenues in conjunction with the proposed project; advised that Richie's Center driveway will be
widened in order to function as a commercial driveway which will assist with entering/existing
movements; and expressed concern with the continual cut -through traffic from Enterprise Circle
through the Plaza, then making left-hand turn movement onto Jefferson Avenue.
Because of the cost associated with the installation of traffic signals, Public Works Director
Hughes advised that the City regularly installs two traffic signals per year and that based on
existing delay factors, a signal, at this time, at Sanborn Avenue would not be warranted.
If the City were to concur with the installation of a traffic signal at Sanborn Avenue at some
future time, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero noted that it would be staffs opinion that a traffic light
would not be detrimental but that, at this point in time, it would merely be a matter of cost.
Viewing the area of discussion as a principle portion of the City's business community, Mr.
Comerchero noted that the City Council may need to adjust the prioritization of this particular
R:\Minutes\052504
traffic signal and requested that staff explore potential funding sources for the installation of a
traffic signal at Sanborn Avenue.
Viewing the Capital Improvement Program as a five-year living document which is meant to
change to meet priorities dependent on circumstances, Councilman Stone noted that the
installation of a traffic signal at Sanborn Avenue may be such a circumstance. Mr. Stone
requested a copy of the completed traffic study.
Echoing Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero's comments, Councilman Washington as well commented
on the need to be sensitive to the businesses within the area and, therefore, relayed support of
moving up the prioritization of this traffic signal.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero moved to approve staff recommendation with the
caveat to continue discussion of the installation of a traffic signal at Sanborn Avenue to the May
20, 2004 Budget Workshop. Councilman Stone seconded the motion and voice vote reflected
unanimous approval.
For Mayor Naggar, Public Works Director Hughes confirmed that it would be staffs intent to
continue working with the business owners with regard to the design of the signs as well as
traffic movements.
14 Potential Uses for recently acquired property in Old Town
(at the request of Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero)
RECOMMENDATION:
14.1 Provide direction to staff on public use alternatives for the recently acquired
properties in Old Town.
Deputy City Manager Thornhill thanked staff for their assistance associated with this
presentation; advised that the original intent for purchasing the Old Town property was to land
bank the property and to explore future opportunities; and commented on opportunities to
energize the Old Town area, addressing the following:
• Location
Alternative opportunities
• Existing structures
o Parking
o Public plaza/open space/green belt
o Public facilities
o Historical structures
Respecting history/tradition of Old Town
Mr. Thornhill noted that it would be staffs recommendation that the City Council pursue the
development of a Master Plan for a Civic Center Complex to include parking, open space, public
square, and City Hall and authorize $250,000 in the Capital Improvement Program for the
completion of a Master Plan and to authorize the development of an operating agreement
R:\Minutes\052504
between the City and the Temecula Museum Board for the operation of the Escallier
House/Barn in the event it were relocated.
Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero commended Mr. Thornhill on his efforts associated with this project
particularly with regard to the historic structures.
For Councilman Washington, City Manager Nelson noted that the final disposition of the current
City Hall site has not been determined but that all opportunities will be explored as part of the
master planning process and implementation of phasing.
Having a parking agreement with the City for property next to the Stampede, Mr. Neil Cleveland,
28046 Del Rio, one of the owners of the Temecula Stampede, expressed concern with existing
parking issues; supported the proposed parking structure and a City Hall; and requested that
parking be developed to compensate with the development of businesses.
Viewing the construction of a civic center complex as the final piece of the puzzle for Old Town,
Councilman Roberts noted that in light of the property needed for the construction of such a
complex, no other location in the City would meet such requirements. Mr. Roberts as well
commended Mr. Thornhill on a job well done and concurred with placing the appropriation for a
Master Plan in the Capital Improvement Program.
Concurring with Councilman Roberts' comments, Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero stated that the
development of such a complex would further bring life into Old Town and create new
opportunities for private investment and, therefore, expressed his support of it.
As well viewing the possibility of a civic center complex as the final piece of the puzzle for Old
Town, Councilman Stone commented on the synergy that will further enhance Old Town and
the property values that will be increased which will further benefit the City and echoed
comments of commendation for Mr. Thornhill.
Relaying his excitement with this endeavor, Councilman Washington noted that Old Town is
blossoming and will be a beautiful section of this community.
Impressed with the proposed project and relaying his support of it, Mayor Naggar commented
on the City's need to maintain the Western theme throughout Old Town; thanked the associated
efforts of the Museum Board with regard to the Escallier House/Barn; supported the
recommendation of making the house an archive for historical documents; addressed the noted
parking issue in Old Town; and advised that such issues will be addressed in the Master Plan.
Viewing the relocation of the Escallier House to Sam Hicks Park as an expansion of the existing
museum, City Manager Nelson echoed his excitement for this project and, for Mayor Naggar,
noted that once the Master Plan is developed, a phasing plan will be developed; that if the City
were able to control costs and continue to save for this project, the City could be breaking
ground within the next five to six years.
MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to approve funding to pursue the development of a
Master Plan for a Civic Center Complex to include parking, open space/public square, and City
Hall and to authorize staff to develop an operating agreement between the City and the
Temecula Museum Board for the operation of the Escallier House/Barn. The motion was
seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
At!tadJJLI
No additional comments.
R:Vdinutes\052504 10
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
With regard to Closed Session, Assistant City Attorney Assistant City Attorney Curley advised
that there were no reportable actions and noted that because of economic interest, Mayor Pro
Tern Comerchero had excused himself from Closed Session.
ADJOURNMENT
At 9:12 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday,
May 25, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
RAMinutes\052504 11
ITEM 3
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $1,705.283.09.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 81" day of June, 2004.
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 04- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 8`" day of June, 2004 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
OSl20/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
05/26/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
O5/20/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR O6/08104 COUNCIL MEETING:
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
GENERALFUND
$ 506,030.81
165
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
7,858.78
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
115,166.92
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
3,850.04
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
34,610.98
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
6,614.02
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
562,181.84
261
MARGARITA ROAD REIMB DIST
7,900.84
274
CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND
2,772.50
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
12,566.95
300
INSURANCE FUND
7,980.10
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
32,076.46
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
8,231.32
340
FACILITIES
5,145.19
470
CFD 01-2 ADMIWDEBT SVC FUND
60,006.31
475
JOHN WARNER ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
236.50
100
GENERALFUND
165
RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
300
INSURANCE FUND
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
340
FACILITIES
TOTAL BY FUND:
709,809.28
663,420.28
332,053.53
$ 1,705,283.09
1,373,229.56
229,421.49
5,062.09
59,558.65
120.02
5,261.76
827.61
2,271.04
1,037.30
21,047.70
1,773.98
5,671.89 332,053.53
$ 1,705,283.09
PREPARED BY AYONKERSPECIALIST
I , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
GENIE R T ,DIRE R OF FINANCE
I , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
SHAW N NELSON, CITY MANAGER
apChkLst
O5/2012004
2:20:37PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 1
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
322
05/20/2004
000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
State Disability Ins Payment
15,447.50
15,447.50
323
05/20/2004
000283 INSTATAX (IRS)
Federal Income Taxes Payment
60,714.73
60,714.73
324
05/20/2004
001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SO
Nationwide Retirement Payment
19,089.70
19,089.70
325
05/20/2004
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME
PERS ER Paid Member Contr Pmt
59,738.18
59,738.18
326
05/20/2004
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA),
OBRA - Project Retirement Payment
2,378.30
2,378.30
91958
05/13/2004
007638 PARDELL, CHRISTOPHER A.
Design/Creation:Veterans War Mem.
81,653.50
81,653.50
91959
05/17/2004
000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK&
Ntc/Determination:Winch.Rd.Widening
1,314.00
1,314.00
91960
05/20/2004
001104 A R M A
Mb: S.Jones 118998 G.Flores 92035
390.00
390.00
91961
05/20/2004
007707 ALVARDO, DANIEL
Refund: TCC Security Deposit
100.00
100.00
91962
05/20/2004
006463 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE
Mar Idscp impr: Sports Park
346.00
Mar Idscp impr: Sports Park
130.25
476.25
91963
05/20/2004
004022 AMERICAN MINI STORAGE, TE
May storage unit B109 lease
153.00
May storage unit F105 lease
144.00
297.00
91964
05/20/2004
000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
Temp help PPE 5/1 AD/AD/LL
735.75
Temp help PPE 5/1 Medina
580.80
Temp help PPE 5/1 Alexander
381.15
1,697.70
91965
05/20/2004
007465 ARBOGAST, TOMI
Reimb: OES Disaster tmg: 5/3
51.83
51.83
91966
05/20/2004
003137 BARKERS FOOD MACHINERY S
TCC kitchen preventive mntc svc
221.67
CRC kitchen preventive mntc svc
202.67
Sr Ctr kitchen preventive mntc svc
152.00
576.34
91967
05/20/2004
004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES
DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
552.18
DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
438.16
990.34
91968
05/20/2004
006777 BRUSHIA, MICHELLE
Refund: Cartooning -Funny People
30.00
30.00
91969
05/20/2004
003138 CAL MAT
PW patch truck materials
2,288.63
2,288.63
Paget
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 2
05/2012004
2:20:37PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
91970
05/20/2004
005394 CALIF BAGEL BAKERY & DELI
Refreshments: Council closed session
155.16
155.16
91971
06/20/2004
004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCT
Fingerprinting background ck
1,331.00
1,331.00
91972
05/20/2004
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION S
Membership: Gwen Thurston 105694
130.00
130.00
91973
05/20/2004
000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATIONS
'04 So -CA Symposium:RG/JW
80.00
80.00
91974
05/20/2004
002520 CALIF T'S SCREENPRINTING
PW mntc summer uniform t-shirts
463.33
463.33
91975
05/20/2004
006075 CAMPBELL, KENTON SCOTT
TCSD instructor earnings
748.00
748.00
91976
05/20/2004
000131 CARL WARREN & COMPANY I
Jan -Mar Claim adjuster services
1,114.88
Apr Claim adjuster services
184.65
Jan -Mar Claim adjuster services
59.53
1,359.06
91977
05/20/2004
002534 CATERERS CAFE
Refreshments: Indian Gaming Mtg
19.61
19.61
91978
05/20/2004
004837 CHERRY VALLEY FEED & PET
Food & supplies:Police K-9
59.80
59.80
91979
05/20/2004
000137 CHEVRON U S A INC
City vehicles fuel expense:Police
717.57
City vehicles fuel expense: CM
205.08
922.65
91980
05/20/2004
005708 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTI
Youth jazz festival broadcasting svcs
500.00
500.00
91981
05/20/2004
007684 COAKES, ANN
Refund: Security Deposit
100.00
100.00
91982
05/20/2004
004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI
Community Health Charities Payment
163.00
163.00
91983
05/20/2004
001193 COMP U S A INC
Inf System Computer Supplies
264.45
Inf System Computer Supplies
112.74
Inf System Computer Supplies
64.62
441.81
91984
05/20/2004
002147 COMPLIMENTS COMPLAINTS &
MPSC Health Fair Entertainment
100.00
MPSC Health Fair Entertainment
100.00
200.00
91985
05/20/2004
006303 CONDUIT NETWORKS, INC
Network Client svcs: HR mntc
750.00
750.00
91986 05/20/2004 001264 COSTCO W HOLESALE EE computer purchase prgm 1,925.47 1,925.47
Page2
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 3
05/2012004
2:20:37PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
91987
05/20/2004
006042
CREATIVE EVENT SOLUTIONS
EMS Conf:6/9-11:BD,M8,TD,CT
1,747.66
1,747.66
91988
05/20/2004
001393
DATA TICKET INC
Mar Parking citation processing svcs
924.26
924.26
91989
05/20/2004
005598
DEHESA CHARTER SCHOOL
Refund: CRC Security Deposit
100.00
100.00
91990
05/20/2004
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
Btrfld Stage Prk portable restrooms
56.78
56.78
91991
05/20/2004
001714
DREAM ENGINEERING INC
Design Vail Ranch Court Lights
2,305.00
2,305.00
91992
05/20/2004
001380
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
Temp help PPE 4/30 Hear
6,039.02
Temp help PPE 4/30 Grove
2,213.60
Temp help PPE 4/30 Rush
1,841.69
Temp help PPE 4/30 Sang
1,303.03
Temp help PPE 4/30 Novotny
1,214.04
Temp help PPE 4/30 Lontok
1,200.00
Temp help PPE 4/30 Gutierrez
1,192.80
Temp help PPE 4/30 Cammarota
1,040.02
Temp help PPE 4/30 Barreda
1,017.00
17,061.20
91993
05/20/2004
000395
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CO
5/27 EDC Otly mtg:O'Grady/Wolnick
60.00
60.00
91994
05/20/2004
002438
ENGEN CORPORATION
Apr Geotech Srvcs:John Warner
1,882.50
1,882.50
91995
05/20/2004
002939
ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS R
ESRI tmg:K.Beal:5/10-11
850.00
850.00
91996
05/20/2004
005251
EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE
PW mobile equip repair svcs
522.60
522.60
91997
05/20/2004
000164
ESGIL CORPORATION
Apr Bldg & Safety plan check svcs
10,179.67
10,179.67
91998
05/20/2004
006487
EUROPEAN CAFE & VINEYARD
Refreshments:Citizens Advisory Com.
65.13
65.13
Page3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
05/20/2004 2:20:37PM CITYOFTEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
91999 05/20/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
HEWLETT PACKARD
TT 2laptop computer batteries
722.84
HYATT
SJ HtI:CCAC conf:4/21-23:SJ
676.17
CHIVALRY LIMOUSINE LLC
SJ Transportation:Old Town Tour
360.00
ZOOMERANG
TT Web page designer subscriber svc
350.00
COUNTRY GARDEN RESTAURA
WH PW mntc pdt updates mtg
138.95
CIRCUIT CITY
TT Flash memory/Camera accessories
134.66
HAWTHORN SUITES
JO Htl:State Lobby Trip:5/3-4
123.58
SWING INN CAFE
SJ Refreshments:Old Town Tour
119.02
150 GRAND CAFE
JO Refreshments:CM business mtg
110.90
AMAZON.COM, INC
TT Publication purchase
92.94
URBAN LAND INSTITUTE
JM ULI Inland Empire Mtg:5/5
55.00
CHO CHO SAN
SJ Meal:'04 CCAC conf:4/21-23
53.31
BATTERYW EB.COM
TT Panasonic camcorder battery
51.50
EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICES
SN Fuel expense for City vehicles
48.40
JM bank charges
34.02
SPRINT
TT Cellular phone clip
32.30
STADIUM PIZZA
TT Refreshments:late business mtg
30.67
BLACK ANGUS
WH Refreshments: Trffc issues mtg
22.61
ONTARIO AIRPORT
JO Ovmght Prkg:Lobby Tdp:5/3-4
17.00
VERISIGN, INC.
TT Digital ID Class 1: Info System
14.95
EARTHLINK INC
TT Council members Internet svcs
10.97
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS
MN Misc office supplies: Council
6.89 3,206.68
92000 05/20/2004 001135 FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED
Pre -employment physical
85.00 85.00
92001
05/20/2004
004105 GIFTSGALORE
TCSD Egg Hunt supplies
1,301.60
1,301.60
92002
05/20/2004
005405 GILLILAND, ROBIN
Reimb: Photos of Sister City Trip
88.66
88.66
92003 05/20/2004 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies: TCSD recreation 725.94 725.94
PageA
apChkLst
05/20/2004
2:20:37PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check N
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92004
05/20/2004
004890
GOLDEN STATE FIRE
5 yr fire sprklr inspect cert:C.Museum
380.00
380.00
92005
05/20/2004
005947
GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT
Express Mail Service: Fire
15.86
15.86
92006
05/20/2004
007706
GOODWIN, DARRELL
Refund: TCC Security Deposit
100.00
100.00
92007
05/20/2004
001609
GREATER ALARM COMPANY I
Police Sub Stn Alarm Monitoring svcs
66.00
66.00
92008
05/20/2004
007498
GUIDANCE SOFTWARE INC
Police dept Encase forensic software
3,795.13
3,795.13
92009
05/20/2004
007702
GUTIERREZ, REBECCA
Refund: Ex: Getty Museum
12.00
12.00
92010
05/20/2004
005311
H2O CERTIFIED POOL WATER
CRCITES Pool cleaningtchemicals
2,157.94
2,157.94
92011
05/20/2004
002372
HARMON, JUDY
TCSD instructor earnings
475.04
475.04
92012
05/20/2004
007714
HARRIS, MATT
Reimb:'04 Nat'l APA Conf:4/24-28
736.16
736.16
92013
05/20/2004
007686
HERRERA, SOCORRO
Refund: Picnic Shelter
30.00
30.00
92014
05/20/2004
007657
HOBBY SHACK
2004 Kite day supplies
124.27
124.27
92015
05/20/2004
005748
HODSON, CHERYL A.
Support Payment
28.38
28.38
92016
05/20/2004
000963
HOGAN, DAVID
Reimb:'04 AEP Conf:4/15-19/04
169.69
169.69
92017
05/20/2004
004217
HYDRO TEK COMPANY
PW Pressure Washer parts
85.35
85.35
92018
05/20/2004
000193
1 C M A
Membership: Shawn Nelson 265746
1,334.53
1,334,53
92019
05/20/2004
000194
1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45
1 C M A Retirement
6,652.85
6,652.85
92020
05/20/2004
005778
IMAGE WATCHES INC
City of Temecula logo watches
419.45
419.45
92021
05/20/2004
004833
IMPERIAL PAVING COMPANY I
PW Citywide A.C. Repairs
36,185.00
36,185.00
Pages
apChkLst
06/20/2004
2:20:37PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank: union UNION BANK
OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92022
05/20/2004
001517
INTEGRATED INSIGHTS DBA: H
May Employee assistance prgm
686.28
686.28
92023
05/20/2004
001407
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I
Pool sanitizing chemicals
254.29
254.29
92024
05/20/2004
002140
JAGUAR COMPUTER SYSTEMS
May Network Client Services
207.04
207.04
92025
05/20/2004
007708
JOHNSON, HALEY
Refund: MPSC Security Deposit
100.00
100.00
92026
05/20/2004
002575
JONES, SUSAN W.
EE computer purchase prgm
1,844.62
1,844.62
92027
05/20/2004
002424
KELLEY DISPLAY INC
111 American Flag Banners
390.54
390.54
92028
05/20/2004
001091
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT
Apr design svcs:Affordable Housing
1,063.14
Apr design Svcs:Old Town Rehab
243.75
1,306.89
92029
05/20/2004
004481
KIMLEY HORN & ASSOCIATES I
Design Svcs:Murr. Crk Trail Prjt
6,656.50
6,656.50
92030
05/20/2004
000206
KINKOS INC
Stationery paper/mist supplies
12.88
12.88
92031
05/20/2004
004122
KRUEGER, KIMBERLEE
EE computer purchase prgm
1,905.68
1,905.68
92032
05/20/2004
004062
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
Battery packsihandles: Police
667.28
667.28
92033
05/20/2004
002519
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY INC
Safety Supplies for Public Works
292.61
292.61
92034
05/20/2004
006486
LAKE ELSINORE BALLET
Entertainment: TCC Cinco de Mayo
150.00
150.00
92035
05/20/2004
006744
LAMAR CORPORATION, THE
1-15 Old Town billboard advertising
2,500.00
1-15 Old Town billboard change out
450.00
2,950.00
92036
05/20/2004
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
Paramedic squad supplies: Fire
483.76
Paramedic squad supplies: Fire
171.60
655.36
92037
05/20/2004
004174
LIGHT IMPRESSIONS
T. Museum exhibit supplies
247.91
247.91
92038
05/20/2004
006955
LONG, DAN
Reimb:'04 Nat'l APA Conf:4/24-28
108.62
108.62
92039
05/20/2004
004087
LOWE'S
Misc hardware supplies: West Wing
221.95
221.95
Page£
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
05/20/2004 2:20:37PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
92040 05/20/2004 004087 LOW E'S Misc hardware supplies: TCSD 129.69 129.69
92041 05/20/2004 006182 M C M CONSTRUCTION, INC.
92042 05/20/2004 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS
92043 05/20/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC
92044 05/20/2004 004068 MANALILI, AILEEN
92045 05/20/2004 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC
Prgs Pmt #8:R.C. Bridge Widening
Stop Ntc:Cemex:R.C. Bridge Widening
Var. Sign Stock & Repair: PW Maint.
15 "No Dumping Refuse/Fill Dirr Sign
Custodial Supplies: City Hall
Custodial Supplies: Parks
Custodial Supplies: Senior Center
Custodial Supplies: CRC
Custodial Supplies: West Wing
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
TCSD Instructor Earnings
qty 5000:Tem. Demographic Profile
92046 05/20/2004 005565 MCSI MEDIA CONSULTANTS Completion:Traffic Operations Center
92047 05/20/2004 004894 MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIA Mar Eng Svcs:Pechanga Phase II
92048 05/20/2004 007210 MIDORI GARDENS
92049 05/20/2004 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS
92050 05/20/2004 007705 MITCHELL, DANNY
92051 05/20/2004 001892 MOBILE MODULAR
92052 05/20/2004 007685 MORENO, MARGARITA
Install Plants: Tem. Duck Pond
Install Shrubs: Winchester Crk Prk
Install Shrubs: T. Museum
City Stationery: PW Dept.
Business Cards: Police - Truscott
Business Cards: Police - Franchville
Business Cards: Police - Hernandez
Business Cards: Police - Brown
Refund:Sec. Deposit:TCC
May Modular Bldg Rental:Stn 92
Refund:Sec. Deposit:TCC
92053 05/20/2004 000727 NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION Fire Codes & Standards: Fire Prev.
92054 05/20/2004 004933 NATIONAL FIRE SPRINKLER A Sprinkler Protection Sem:6/1-3
116,714.00
-20,796.58
2,425.45
395.98
305.75
222.77
110.52
89.11
44.55
743.20
331.52
250.00
42.00
1,754.17
5,000.00
604.90
634.00
592.00
570.00
778.29
42.83
42.83
42.83
42.83
100.00
832.40
100.00
973.47
297.00
95,917.42
2,821.43
772.70
1,366.72
1,754.17
5,000.00
604.90
1,796.00
949.61
100.00
832.40
100.00
973.47
297.00
Page:?
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 8
05/20/2004
2:20:37PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check#
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92055
05/20/2004
005608
NEUMAN, JASON
Reimb: Office Equipment
107.72
107.72
92056
05/20/2004
007548
NO BUTT BINS COMPANY
standard/high tower bins: City Hall
827.11
827.11
92057
05/20/2004
007703
NOWLIN, AMANDA
Refund:Aquatics-WSI
170.00
170.00
92058
05/20/2004
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
541.67
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
346.36
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
193.19
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
122.86
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
117.68
Tires for Police Trailer
116.71
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
114.88
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
110.59
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
77.60
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
67.50
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
55.63
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
34.79
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
33.50
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
33.50
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
32.22
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
23.50
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
19.29
2,041.47
92059
05/20/2004
002297
OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER
Jan Model Relocation Plan: Prk Lot
2,500.00
Mar Model Relocation Plan: Prk Lot
1,737.50
Feb Model Relocation Plan: Prk Lot
360.00
4,597.50
92060
05/20/2004
002652
PAT & OSCARS RESTAURANT
Refreshments:Sister Cities:6r6/04
559.94
559.94
92061
05/20/2004
007591
PAUL LASLO & ASSOCIATES
Event jotter: emerg. operations
78.96
78.96
92062
05/20/2004
003218
PELA
Apr plan check svcs/inspection:TCSD
5,000.00
5,000.00
92063
05/20/2004
001958
PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG
PERS Long Tenn Care Payment
288.55
288.55
92064
05/20/2004
004790
PETER D BRANDOW & ASSOCI
Design Svcs:79S S/W, Ldscp Imprvs
935.27
935.27
92065
05/20/2004
000249
PETTY CASH
Petty Cash Reimbursement
237.73
237.73
92066 05/20/2004 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPAN Apr Spring Egg Hunt Ad: TCSD 246.00 246.00
PageE
apChkLst
05/20/2004
2:20:37PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 9
Bank:
union UNION BANK
OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92067
05/20/2004
004529
QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY-DA
Repair/Maint:Police Motorcycles
473.14
473.14
92068
05/20/2004
004318
R J BULLARD CONSTRUCTION
Prgs Pmt# 13:Pechanga Soundwall
99,137.41
99,137.41
92069
05/20/2004
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
Various Water Meters
7,382.18
7,382.18
92070
05/20/2004
004584
REGENCY LIGHTING
Electrical Supplies: Old Town
851.25
Electrical Supplies: Senior Center
358.94
Electrical Supplies: CRC
348.33
Electrical Supplies: CRC
286.40
Electrical Supplies: Old Town
278.16
Electrical Supplies: T. Museum
98.70
2,221.78
92071
05/20/2004
006483
RICHARDS, TYREASHA I.
TCSD Instructor Earnings
280.00
280.00
92072
05/20/2004
000266
RIGHTWAY
Equip Rental - Lng Cyn Crk Prk
59.79
59.79
92073
05/20/2004
006371
RIO PROPERTIES, INC.
Htl:Fire/Life-Safety Cf:714-15:Q3FH3
267.05
267.05
92074
05/20/2004
001097
ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC
Maint. Supplies:PW Stencil Truck
656.10
656.10
92075
05/20/2004
000271
ROBERT BEIN W M FROST & A
Mar Consult Svcs:Land Mitigation
500.00
Mar Prjt Study Report: 1-15/SR79S
165.72
665.72
92076
05/20/2004
003544
ROBERT SHEA PERDUE REAL
Appraisal Fee:Roripaugh Ranch
1,500.00
1,500.00
92077
05/20/2004
000873
ROBERTS, RONALD H.
Reimb:Sister Cities/Voorburg:4/29-5/3
52.88
Reimb:APTA Rail Conf:4/16-20/04
37.00
Reimb:SCAG Lobbying:4/14/04
34.02
Reimb:Leag/Gen. Assembly:5/12-13
32.15
156.05
92078
05/20/2004
005018
SACHER, SUZANNE L.
TCSD Instructor Earnings
1,356.80
1,356.80
92079
05/20/2004
005227
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF
Support Payment
33.24
33.24
92090
05/20/2004
006815
SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF
Support Payment
12.50
12.50
92081
05/20/2004
006176
SANTA ANA COLLEGE
Mgmt 2E:J.Neuman:10/18-22104
125.00
125.00
92082
05/20/2004
000793
SCANTRON FPC CORPORATIO
Inspection Request Forms: B&S Dept.
837.24
837.24
Pages
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
05/20/2004 2:20:37PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
92083 05/20/2004 007342 SHUTE, MIHALY & WEINBERGE Mar Legal Services Pmt 3,528.17 3,628.17
92084 05/20/2004 003934 SIMPLER LIFE EMERGENCY 100 emerg. tool kits:Tem. Citizen Corp
92085 05/20/2004 002718 SO CALIF CITY CLERKS ASSN General Mtg:6/17:S.Jones/C.Domenoe
92086 05/20/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Apr 2-00-397-5059 Various Mtrs
May 2-25-393-4681 T.E.S. Pool
May 2-24-628-8963 Btrlld Stage
92087 05/20/2004 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY May Various Gas Meters
May 095-167-7907-2 Fire Sm 84
92088 05/20/2004 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS TRANSCRI Apr Transcription Svcs:Tem. Police
92089 05/20/2004 003840 STRONGS PAINTING
92090 05/20/2004 007683 SYNAPSE
92091 05/20/2004 007704 TARBELL, JUDITH
Prep/paint var. items: Old Town
TCSD staff teambuilding wkshp
Refund:Tennis Camp Kids
92092 05/20/2004 005985 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION G Printer Supplies: I.S. Dept.
92093 05/20/2004 006914 TEMECULA COPIERS INC. Apr Copier Usage Chrgs: City Hall
92094 05/20/2004 000515 TEMECULA VALLEY CHAMBER FY 03104 4th Otr Funding Pmt
92095 05/20/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith Svcs: Aquatics
Locksmith Svcs: City Hall
92096 05/20/2004 004030 TEMECULA VOLUNTEER FIRE Reimb: Support Expenses
92097 05/20/2004 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC D.J. Svcs:Teen Prgm Band Jam:5/14
92098 05/20/2004 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE I "Only Rain In The Drain' Tape: PW
Traffic Control Supplies: PW Maint.
Traffic Control Supplies: PW Maint.
92099 05/20/2004 007118 U S TELPACIFIC CORPORATIO May Internet IF Addresses Block
8,168.02
60.00
7,310.52
468.23
25.15
2,098.19
126.86
1,593.60
13,800.00
2,204.84
80.00
1,203.87
2,996.43
37,000.00
430.00
24335
709.16
225.00
5,150.45
488.11
172.40
539.75
8,168.02
60.00
7,803.90
2,225.05
1,593.60
13,800.00
2,204.84
80.00
1,203.87
2,996.43
37,000.00
673.35
709.16
225.00
5,810.96
539.76
Page:10
apChkLst
05/20/2004
2:20:37PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 11
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92100
05/20/2004
000325 UNITED WAY
United Way Charities Payment
220.00
220.00
92101
05/20/2004
003497 VAIL RANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL
performance:Youth Jazz Festival A/17
200.00
200.00
92102
05/20/2004
004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA
May roor5072 General Usage
4,135.51
May �-0073 General Usage
247.02
May )=-1473 Old Town Stn
110.67
May )=-1603 City Hall
89.46
May m-1941 PTA CD TTACSD
57.89
May)=-3851 General Usage
40.70
May )=-8573 General Usage
27.91
May �-3923 Stone
27.16
4,736.32
92103
05/20/2004
004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES I
May long distance phone svos
1,611.94
1,611.94
92104
05/20/2004
004861 VON RICHTER, POLLY
Reimb:Debt Financing Sem:5/06
145.18
145.18
92105
05/20/2004
007697 WESTIN ST. FRANCIS HOTEL, T
Htl:Aocela Cf:Brown/Ching:7/18-22
1,177.31
1,177.31
92106
05/20/2004
007701 WOLF CREEK DEVELOPMENT,
Refund:Adv. Energy Fees
255.00
255.00
Grand
Total All Checks:
70g 809.28
Page:11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
05/26/2004 5:14:06PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check# Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
92107 05/26/2004 001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS Misc Recreation Supplies 20.38 20.38
92108 05/26/2004 004148 A T & T May Long distance svcs: P.D.
92109
05/26/2004
005735 AEROSURF INC
Apr, May, June internet svcs
92110
05/26/2004
007667 AMERICAN CIVIL WAR ASSN
5/22-23 Western days entertainment
92111
05/26/2004
006463 AMERICAN LANDSCAPE
Apr Idscp svcs: Sports Parks
Apr Idscp svcs: Slopes
Credit: Failure to meet requirements
92112
05/26/2004
000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS
Lifeguard training supplies:Aquatics
92113
05/26/2004
007720 ANCOP FOUNDATION USA, IN
Refund: CRC security deposit
92114
05/26/2004
007726 ANDERSON, AARON
Refund: Sports - BB fundamentals
92115 05/26/2004 000101 APPLE ONE, INC.
92116 05/26/2004 006721 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE
92117 05/26/2004 007496 BOND BLACKTOP INC
92118 05/26/2004 004176 BROADWING
Temp help PPE 5/8 Douvres/Lee
Temp help PPE 5/8 Alexander
Temp help PPE 5/8 Wills
Temp help PPE 5/8 Lee
Temp help PPE 5/8 Medina
Temp help PPE 5/8 Barrett -Scott
Misc office supplies: Finance
Asphalt crackfill prjt various sites
May Long distance & internet svcs
92119
05/26/2004
004621 C-18 INC
Extra street striping project work
92120
05/26/2004
005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE
Membership: Tom Cole
92121
05/26/2004
005384 CALIF BAGEL BAKERY & DELI
PW Staff prjt updates mtg
92122
05/26/2004
000647 CALIF DEPT OF CONSUMER A
CPA license: Genie Roberts 58537
180.80
299.70
200.00
25,645.82
15,533.00
-920.00
32.00
100.00
40.00
1,080.00
602.58
580.80
528.00
435.60
108.00
jkz,
20,187.45
1,775.02
3,069.89
40.00
457.94
200.00
180.80
299.70
200.00
40,258.82
32.00
100.00
40.00
3,334.98
91.26
20,187.45
1,775.02
3,069.89
40.00
457.94
200.00
Page:1
apChkLst
05/26/2004
5:14:06PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 2
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check 0
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92123
05/26/2004
000790 CALIF DEPT OF PESTICIDE
Applicator Certif. M. Wiechec 100906
30.00
30.00
92124
05/26/2004
000398 CALIF MUNI TREASURERS ASS
Membership: Genie Roberts
120.00
120.00
92125
05/26/2004
002520 CALIF T'S SCREENPRINTING
Uniforms for PW mntc staff
698.22
698.22
92126
05/26/2004
004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES,
Stn 73 & CRC Copier lease part
328.63
328.63
92127
05/26/2004
005417 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY
First aid supplies: City Hall
80.60
First aid supplies: PW mntc
51.29
131.89
92128
05/26/2004
003478 CLOUD 9 LIMOUSINE SERVICE
Sister city trip airport transportation
845.00
845.00
92129
05/26/2004
001193 COMP U S A INC
GIS 19" Multimedia Monitor
882.99
882.99
92130
05/26/2004
007179 COMPUTER SERVICE COMPAN
Apr Traffic Signal mntc svcs
164.54
164.54
92131
05/26/2004
003986 COZAD & FOX INC
Apr/May theater storm drain dsgn
1,890.00
1,890.00
92132
05/26/2004
004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES
Jun lease & maint for police satellite
2,086.14
2,086.14
92133
05/26/2004
004569 DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATE
Apr special tax consulting:Roripaugh C
296.82
296.82
92134
05/26t2004
002990 DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES
June Federal lobbyist secs
3,000.00
3,000.00
92135
05/26/2004
007723 DE LA TORRE, MAYRA
Reimb: CDIAC Sem:519.7
272.50
272.50
92136
05/26/2004
005598 DEHESA CHARTER SCHOOL
Refund: MPSC security deposit
100.00
100.00
92137
05/26/2004
003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
Portable restrooms for C. Museum
141.94
Portable restroom for clean-up day
91.55
233.49
92138
05/26/2004
003317 DOMENOE, CHERYL
Reimb: Budget Wrkshp supplies
118.95
118.95
92139
05/26/2004
004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI
Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD 61343
993.12
Fuel for city vehicles: PW Mntc 61353
741.17
1,734.29
92140
05/26/2004
004781 DRAEGER SAFETY INC
Repair of Police breathalyzers
159.86
159.86
Page2
apChkLst
05/26/2004
5:14:06PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 3
Bank:
union UNION BANK
OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92141
05/26/2004
001380
E S I EMPLOYMENT SERVICES
Temp help PPE 4/30 Kanigowski
1,480.06
1,480.06
92142
05/26/2004
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
95366-02 Diego Dr Ldscp
328.86
328.86
92143
05/26/2004
002438
ENGEN CORPORATION
Apr geotech srvcs: John Warner
890.00
890.00
92144
05/26/2004
004464
EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICES
Fuel expense for City vehicles
23.05
23.05
92145
05/26/2004
000478
FAST SIGNS
City web address lettering for vehicles
355.78
355.78
92146
05/26/2004
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
Express mail services
205.49
Express mail services
193.46
398.95
92147
05/26/2004
001511
HELDMAN ROLAPP & ASSOCIA
Financial analysis:Harveston II CFD
2,894.81
Financial analysis:Butterfield CFD
1,267.50
4,162.31
92148
05/26/2004
000166
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
Lot Book Reprt: Petricka
150.00
150.00
92149
05/26/2004
003347
FIRST BANKCARD CENTER
ACCELA.COM
TT Accela Conf:7/19-22:Kmeger
425.00
425.00
92150
05/26/2004
001135
FIRST CARE INDUSTRIAL MED
Apr ee physicals and drug testing
100.00
100.00
92151
05/26/2004
004239
FISHER SEHGALYANEZ INC
Mar/Apr dsgn svos: Comm Theater
385.87
385.87
92152
05/26/2004
004514
G T S I CORP
Panasonic toughbook accessories
1,920.48
1,920.48
92153
05/26/2004
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
Office Supplies: Fire Stns
175.54
175.54
92154
05/26/2004
005947
GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT
Express Mail Service: Fire Prevention
36.88
36.88
92155
05/26/2004
000520
H D L COREN & CONE INC
Apr -Jun Property Tax Consulting Srvc
2,400.00
2,400.00
92156
05/26/2004
004053
HABITAT WEST INC
May Lg Cyn Basin Mntc svcs
558.33
558.33
92157
05/26/2004
007637
IMAGINE ADVERTISING
Oval soft key tags for police 15 min
479.48
479.48
92158
05/26/2004
007718
IMANI TEMPLE OF TEMECULA
Refund: Sr Ctr security deposit
100.00
100.00
Page3
apChkLst
05/26/2004
5:14:06PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 4
Bank: union UNION BANK
OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check If
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92159
05/26/2004
004219
INDUSTRIAL DISTRIBUTION GR
Misc. tools and supplies for PW Mntc
1,675.25
1,675.25
92160
05/26/2004
001407
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I
Pool sanitizing chemicals
292.43
Pool sanitizing chemicals
190.72
483.15
92161
05/26/2004
007727
JEWETT, BRIAN
Refund: Sports - BB fundamentals
40.00
40.00
92162
05/26/2004
004115
K T U & ASSOCIATES
Mar Roripaugh trails mstr dsgn svcs
5,748.10
5,748.10
92163
05/26/2004
006744
LAMAR CORPORATION, THE
Mar Old Town billboard advertising
2,500.00
2,500.00
92164
05/26t2004
001690
LAUTZENHISERS STATIONERY
City's Permanent Record Books
1,235.29
1,235.29
92165
05/26/2004
000210
LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
Agency membership dues
125.00
125.00
92166
05/26/2004
004905
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & WHITMOR
Apr HR legal svcs for TE060400001
432.00
432.00
92167
05/26/2004
004087
LOWE'S
Misc hardware supplies: TCSD
16.12
16.12
92168
05/26/2004
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS
Various signs/Hardware: PW mntc
1,784.61
1,784.61
92169
05/26/2004
001967
MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER
Temp Help w/o 04/11 J.DJA.A./J.N.
1,710.17
Temp Help w/o 04/18 J.DJA.A./J.N.
1,630.77
3,340.94
92170
05/26/2004
004929
MARK FISHER COMPANY, THE
ad in Flying Adventures Magazine
538.00
Balloon/Wine Festival Prgm Ad/CD
188.00
726.00
92171
05/26/2004
004951
MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING I
CRC Welding Services
280.00
280.00
92172
05/26/2004
001384
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Letterhead Stationery:Council
177.37
"Electrical" labels: B&S Dpt.
146.65
324.02
92173
05/26/2004
005887
MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEER
Mar Eng Svcs:F.V. Pkwy/1-15
2,766.38
2,766.38
92174
05/26/2004
007725
MORALES DISPLAY
Refund:Sports-BB Fundamentals
40.00
40.00
92175
05/26/2004
000230
MUNIFINANCIAL
Jan -Jun Assess Eng Svcs/P.Ntcs:TCS
22,690.34
22,690.34
92176
05/26/2004
007564
MURRAYS HOTEL &
Freezer for TCC
2,318.78
2,318.78
PageA
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
05/26/2004 5:14:06PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
unlon UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check#
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92177
05/26/2004
007224
N E C BUSINESS NETWORK
multi -line display phone:PW Dpt.
344.43
344.43
92178
05/26/2004
006814
NATIONAL EMERGENCY TRAIN
htl:Deputy Rachael Frost:10/5-9/03
150.00
htl:Deputy Rachael Frost:10/5-9/03
150.00
300.00
92179
05/26/2004
004473
OLD TOWN TEMECULA
Entertainment:Westem Days:5/22-23
900.00
800.00
92180
05/26/2004
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
33.50
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
30.98
64.48
92181
05/26/2004
004491
OLD TYME FOLK
Entertainment:Westem Days:5/22
250.00
250.00
92182
05/26/2004
003299
OLDER THAN DIRT GANG
Entertainment:Westem Days:5123
250.00
250.00
92183
05/26/2004
002297
OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER
Apr Model Relocation Plan: Prk Lot
880.00
880.00
92184
05/26/2004
007721
PARADISE POOLS
Refund:Bldg Permit 33096 Sotelo Or
295.70
295.70
92185
05/26/2004
000733
PARTY PZAZZ
Linen rentals:Council Budget W rkshp
48.95
48.95
92186
05/26/2004
003218
PELA
Apr Ldscp Plan Ck:Sports Complex
344.00
344.00
92187
05/26/2004
000249
PETTY CASH
Petty Cash Reimbursement
652.06
652.06
92188
05/26/2004
003697
PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTAN
3/8-4/11 Dsgn Svcs:Murr.Crk/Ovdnd
4,158.36
4,158.36
92189
05/26/2004
002793
QUICK WRAP BAGS
plans shipping bags: B&S Dpt.
148.95
148.95
92190
05/26/2004
004029
R J M DESIGN GROUP INC
Mar Dsgn Svcs:Sports Complex Pdt
13,877.20
13,877.20
92191
05/26/2004
004457
R J NOBLE COMPANY
Prgs Pmt #4:R.C. Rd Widening
47,705.54
47,705.54
92192
05/26/2004
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
Various Water Meters
9,645.75
Various Water Meters
344.04
9,989.79
92193
05/26/2004
000947
RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS
Dupl. Blueprints Community Theater
274.21
Dupl. Blueprints: Jefferson Ave Rehab
107.16
381.37
92194
05/26/2004
004584
REGENCY LIGHTING
Electrical Supplies: Parks
374.58
374.58
Pages
apChkLst
O5/2612004
5:14:06PM
Final Check List
CITYOFTEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check#
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
92195
05/26/2004
003742
REHAB FINANCIAL CORPORATI
Apr loan collection svcs
16.00
16.00
92196
05/26/2004
007724
REID, BRETT
Refund:BB Fund/ColorMeMine
70.00
70.00
92197
05/26/2004
007402
RICHARD BRADY & ASSOCIATE
3/28-5/1 Dsgn svcs: West Wing Fac
27,352.15
27,352.15
92198
05/26/2004
002412
RICHARDS WATSON &
Mar 2004 legal services
149,398.71
149,398.71
92199
05/26/2004
000266
RIGHTWAY
equip rental - Riverton Park
59.79
59.79
92200
05/26/2004
000353
RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR
Mar'04 parking cite assessments
2,637.50
2,637.50
92201
05/26/2004
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
Apr aperture card duplicates
48.70
48.70
92202
05/26/2004
000406
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP
April 2004 Booking Fees
8,500.80
8,500.80
92203
05/26/2004
005756
RIVERSIDE CO TREASURER
Returning Funds:Property Tax
60,006.31
60,006.31
92204
05/26/2004
001365
RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF
renew perm0:T.E.S. Pool
235.00
renew permit:Temeku Hills Park
81.00
316.00
92205
05/26/2004
001365
RIVERSIDE COUNTY OF
Jan -Mar Vector Control Svcs
84.00
84.00
92206
05/26/2004
003587
RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC
Stairs/Handrails:C.Museum
8,559.00
Build/install Cabinet:IS Training Room
550.00
Repair wall/floor tile:C.Museum
250.00
9,359.00
92207
05/26/2004
004562
SCHIRMER ENGINEERING COR
Apr Plan Ck Svcs: Fire Prev.
2,600.00
2,600.00
92208
05/26/2004
000645
SMART & FINAL INC
Cinco de Mayo:TCC/High Hopes Supp
238.75
Supplies:Senior Center
127.35
Supplies:Teen Prgm
90.44
Credit:lnv. paid twice
-199.72
256.82
Page£
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
05/26/2004 5:14:06PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check # Date Vendor
92209 05/26/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON
92210 05/26/2004 004496 SPARKS EXHIBITS &
92211 05/26/2004 000293 STADIUM PIZZA
(Continued)
Description
Apr 2-19-999-9442 Various Mtrs
May 2-02-351-4946 Senior Ctr
May 2-18-937.3152 T.Museum
May 2-23-365-5992 Fire Stn 92
May 2-22-891-0550 Various Mtrs
May 2-20-817-9929 P.D. O.T. Stn
May 2-11-007-0455 6th St.
May 2-21-911-7892 S.Side Prk Lot
May 2-21-981-4720 Hwy 79
May 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chpl
May 2-22-057-2226 6th St.
May 2-14-204-1615 Fmt St Rdio
Prgs pmt: Children's museum
relreshments:wreath decorating
92212 05/26/2004 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES, I July Movie Rentals:Movies in the Prk
92213 05/26/2004 003599 T Y LIN INTERNATIONAL Apr constr. Support:R.C.Bridge
92214 05/26/2004 000305 TARGET STORE Office Supplies:PW Dept.
Supplies:Aquabcs Prgm
Supplies:TCSD Neighborhood Prgm
Supplies:Tiny Tots FUNdamentals
92215 05/26/2004 005985 TECHNOLOGY INTEGRATION G Printer Supplies/Cartridges: I.S.Dpt.
92216 05/26/2004 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR Medic Squad Vehicle Repair/Maint
92217 05/26/2004 005412 TEMECULA GARDEN & POWER Equip Repairs:PW Maint
Equip Repairs:PW Maint
Equip Repairs:PW Maint
92218 05/26/2004 006305 TEMECULA SISTER CITY ASSN FY 03/04 Sponsorship
92219 05/26/2004 007719 TEMECULA VALLEY GARDEN C Refund:Sec.Deposit:MPSC
92220 05/26/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith Svcs:CRC Gym
92221 05/26/2004 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC D.J. Svcs:Teen Pool Party 5/22/04
D.J. Svcs:Health Fair 5115/04
Amount Paid
1,275.45
1,093.47
754.48
338.93
237.94
226.96
225.93
104.29
45.88
44.00
38.96
18.24
57,231.88
56.77
1,030.00
937.10
380.43
64.31
35.43
7.42
265.87
290.87
243.35
64.42
62.57
7,500.00
100.00
65.00
350.00
250.00
Check Total
4,404.53
57,231.88
56.77
1,030.00
937.10
487.59
265.87
290.87
370.34
7,500.00
100.00
65.00
Page:7
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
05/26/2004 5:14:06PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total
92222 05/26/2004 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONSTRU Sand/Reseal Boardwalks:Old Town 20,000.00 20,000.00
92223 05/26/2004 007433 TOVEY SHULTZ CONSTRUCTIO Prgs Pmt #2:Community Theater
92224 05/26/2004 006192 TRISTAFF GROUP
92225 05/26/2004 005592 TWINING LABORATORIES
92226 05/26/2004 002065 UNISOURCE
92227 05/26/2004 006807 VANIR CONSTRUCTION
Temp Help We 05/16 Bradley
Temp Help We 05/09 Bradley
Mar Svcs:Soundwall Imprv.
Paper Supplies for City Hall
Paper Supplies for City Hall
Mar Constr Mgmt Svcs:Comm.Theater
92228 05/26/2004 004261 VERIZON CALIFORNIA May x)m-0074 General Usage
May �-3564 General Usage
92229 05/26/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internet svcs: P.D. O.T. Stn
Credit:P.D. Storefront Stn
92230 05/26/2004 001890 VORTEX DOORS Garage Door Repairs:Fire Sin 84
92231 05/26/2004 005804 WELLS FARGO BANK E.S.G. Writing Contest Award
92232 05/26/2004 005868 WILLIAMS, RICHARD Refund:Eng Dep:Tr 3552 Lot 14
60,638.97
520.00
520.00
268.00
1,948.12
706.86
18,036.27
256.57
55.81
39.95
-19.98
215.44
r ie,
Grand Total All Checks:
60,638.97
1,040.00
268.00
2,654.98
18,036.27
312.38
19.97
215.44
50.00
995.00
663,420.28
PageB
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
�t
DIRECTOR OF FIN CE
bV—
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Financ
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2004
PREPARED BY: Karin Grance, Revenue Manag
Shannon Domenigoni, Accounts
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Reportas of
April 30, 2004.
DISCUSSION: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the
City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively.
Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635
as of April 30, 2004.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
Attachments: City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2004
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of April 30, 2004
Cash Activity for the Month of April:
Cash and Investments as of April 1, 2004
$ 124,038,311
Cash Receipts
7,065,019
Cash Disbursements
(6,947,438)
Cash and Investments as of April 30, 2004
$ 124,155,892
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/
Purchase Termination
Market Par/Book
Type of Investment
Institution
Yield
Date Date
Value Balance
Petty Cash
City Hall
Na
$ 1,500
General Checking
Union Bank
Tits
1,353,715
(1)
Flex Benefit Demand Deposits
Union Bank
nta
2,947
(I)
Local Agency Investment Fund
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445%
50,775,423
(2)
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co
2,000 %
6/62003 6/302006
987,700 1,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank
1.885 %
6262003 1232006
993,750 1,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank
2.250 %
6262003 7242006
991,880 1,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank
2.500 %
7/162003 8/142006
1,991,880 2,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Cc
3.000 %
12/302003 3292007
984,920 996,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank
3.000 %
3292004 12282007
3,937,520 4,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS
3.000 %
4n2004 W 2008
2,873,263 2,965,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS
3.000 %
4222004 1222008
1,966,880 2,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS
3.070 %
4/152004 1/152008
1,972,500 2,000,000
Federal Agency- Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS
3.100 %
4/82004 1/82008
3,011,875 3,050,000
Federal Agency -Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank -BDS
3.125 %
4/162004 1/162008
997,810 1,000,000
Federal Agency -Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank -BDS
3.150%
4/142004 1/142008
988,750 1,000,000
Federal Agency -Callable
Federal Home Loan Bank -BDS
3.520 %
4/302004 1/302009
1,997,500 2,000,000
Checking Account - Parking Citations
Union Bank
n/a
4,707
Certificate of Deposit - Retention Escrow
Cormnunity National Bank
n/a
271,436
Band Fund - CFD 88-12
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
n/a
0
(Money Market Account)
Delinquency Maintenance Account - CFD 88-12
CDC Funding Corp
5.430 %
9/12017
500,000
(Investment Agreement)
Delinquency Maintenance Account - CFD 88-12
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
595,353
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Fund -CFD 88-12
CDC Funding Corp
5.430%
9/12017
1,531,469
(Investment Agreement)
Reserve Account - CFD 88-12
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.420 %
16
(Money Markel Account)
Special Tax Fund - CFD 01-2
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
0.410 %
790,802
(Money Market Account)
Admin Expense Fund-CFD 01-2
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410%
771,606
(Money Market Account)
Variable Bond Fund - CFD 01-2
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
2,751
(Money Market Account)
Interest Differential Fund - CFD 01-2
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
131,184
(Money Market Account)
Improvement Fund - CFD 01-2
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
3,536,149
(Money Markel Account)
Special Tax Fund - CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
12,141
(Money Markel Account)
Capital Interest Fund- CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
44,670
(Money Markel Account)
Reserve Fund - CFD 03-1
All; Match Fed Corp Ref
4.830 %
863,900
(Investment Agreement)
Reserve Fund - CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
9,398
(Money Markel Account)
Reserve Fund -CFD 03-1
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
281
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
City Improvement Fund- CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
1,495
(Money Markel Account)
City lmprovemcm Fund -CFD 03-1
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
1,505,485
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Cal Trans Improvement Fund - CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
793
(Money Market Account)
Cal Trans Improvement Fund -CPU 03-1
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
1,002,322
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-1
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
1,020
Page t
City of Temecula
City Treasurer's Report
As of Apra 30, 2004
Cash Activity for the Month of April:
Cash and Investments as of April 1, 2004
Cash Receipts
Cash Disbursements
Cash and Investments as of April 30, 2004
Cash and Investments Portfolio:
Maturity/
Purchase Termination Market
Type of Investment
Institution
Yield Date Date Value
(Money Market Account)
Acquisition Account Fund -CFD 03-1
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Capital Interest Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Capital Interest Fund - CFD 03-3
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Reserve Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Fund -CFD 03-3
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
City Improvement Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
City Improvement Fund - CFD 03-3
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
EMWD Improvement Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
EMWD Improvement Fund -CFD 03-3
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445%
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Acquisition Account Fund -CFD 03-3
State Treasurer-LAIF
1,445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Cost of Issuance Fund - CFD 03-3
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Redemption Fund - AD 03-04
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Admin Expense Fund - AD 034
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Fund - AD 03-04
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Improvement Fund - AD 03-04
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Reserve Account -RDA TABS
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
n/a
(Surety Bond)
Project Account- RDA TABS
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Project Account -RDA TABS
Smte Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
Installment Payment Fund - TCSD COPS
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Delivery Cost Fund -TCSD COPS
U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury)
n/a
(Money Market Account)
Project Fund -TCSD COPS
U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury)
0.410 %
(Money Market Account)
Project Fund -TCSD COPS
State Treasurer-LAIF
1.445 %
(Local Agency Investment Fund)
(1)-This amount is net of outstanding checks.
(2)-At April 30, 2004 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $60,906,524,594.
The City's proponianate share of that value is $50,913,740.
All investments are liquid and currently available.
The City of Temecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy.
Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted
and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months.
$ 124,038,311
7,065,019
(6,947,438)
$ 124,155,892
Par/Book
Balance
2,294,739
1,152
834,269
2,173,186
700
4,838
7,790,780
1,779
3,630,170
6,742
9,917,195
89,926
45,712
33,750
99,738
790,423
1
31,219
5,882,219
101
2
9,504
2,796,183
$ 124,155,892
Page 2
CITY OF TEMECULA
Cash and Investments Report
Through April2004
Fund Total
001
GENERAL FUND
23,016,756.99
100
STATE GAS TAX FUND
114,131.16
101
STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND
73,377.55
120
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
15,465,215.97
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
0.00
150
AB 2766 FUND
116,725.98
160
AB 3229 COPS
0.00
165
RDA LOW/MOD - 20% SET ASIDE
7,070,337.24
170
MEASURE A FUND
4,367,179.27
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
177,502.18
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL °B" STREET LIGHTS
27,112.08
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 'C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE
102,201.95
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 'D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
103,879.96
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 'R" STREET/ROAD MAINT
25,439.13
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
21,497,201.23
271
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON IMPROVEMENT FUND
3,533,424.32
273
CFD 03-1 CROWN HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND
0.00
274
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD-CIP
392,595.78
275
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK-ADMIN EXPENSE
12,646.26
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT
8,805,789.07
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,339,930.49
310
VEHICLES FUND
622.59
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
761,884.23
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
209,313.06
340
FACILITIES
140,531.93
380
RDA 2002 TABS DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,205,059.08
390
TCSD 2001 COP's DEBT SERVICE FUND
2,267.77
460
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE RESERVE FUND
3,075,160.99
470
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON DEBT SERVICE FUND
2,132,926.58
471
CFD 98-1 WINCHESTER HILLS DEBT SERVICE
11,512.37
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
5,918,480.93
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
7,878.73
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
24,448,807.18
Grand Total:
124,155,892.05
ITEM 5
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FII
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: 'yo William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Authorize Temporary Street Closures for the Street Painting Festival in Old
Town (Main Street between Old Town Front Street and the easterly terminus
of Main Street, and Mercedes Street between Main Street and Third Street)
PREPARED BY: 1'ff Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
$Steve Charette, Associate Engineer.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES
FORTHE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC
SPECIAL EVENT
BACKGROUND: The Annual Street Painting Festival scheduled for June 19th and 20th of this
year necessitates the physical closure of certain streets in the Old Town area, and related detouring,
as these streets serve as the canvas on which artists will paint. The street closures will also serve
to accommodate and provide the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential
vehicular -pedestrian conflicts.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, 'Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those
highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for,
among other instances, 'temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local
special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the
closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way.
While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for
delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events.
r.\agdrpt\2004\0608\street paintlng festival.closure
The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the
Street Painting Festival sponsored by the City of Temecula. This authority is limited to and
delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events
requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the
approval of the City Council subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These
rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular
Code Section 21101.
This year's Street Painting Festival requires the closure of Main Street between Old Town Front
Street and the easterly terminus of Main Street and Mercedes Street between Main Street and Third
Street from 6:00 AM on Saturday June 1 gth 2004 to 5:00 PM on Sunday June 201h• 2004. The
designated streets will remain closed through Saturday night. A detour is proposed on Mercedes
Street to Old Town Front Street.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police and for provision, placement, and retrieval of necessary
warning and advisory devices by the Temecula Community Services Department and the City Public
Works Maintenance Division are included in budgetary items.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2004-
2. Location Map
r?agdrpt\2004\0608\street painting festival.dosure
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES
FOR THE STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL AND AUTHORIZING THE
CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC
SPECIAL EVENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the
Street Painting Festival sponsored by the City of Temecula, for which such temporary street
closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for
this special event; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close public streets for the Street Painting Festival; and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve
temporary street closures for the Street Painting Festival sponsored by the City of Temecula, and to
establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and
approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and,
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Street Painting Festival
scheduled from 6:00 AM Saturday June 19th, 2004 to 5:00 PM Sunday June 20th, 2004 and
establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shall be approved or
denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 8th day of June 2004.
ATTEST:
Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
rAagdrpt\2004\0608\street painting fesGval.Gosure
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2004- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
rAagdrpt\2004\0608\street painting festival.closure
is
ITEM 6
CITY ATTORNEY It
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER -9
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Tm Villiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Authorize Temporary Street Closure of Old Town Front Street between
Moreno Road and 2nd Street; Main Street from the Bridge to Old Town Front
Street; 2nd Street; 3rd Street; 4ch Street, 5`h Street, 61h Street, and Mercedes
Street between Moreno Road and 2nd Street for the "Star Spangled 4'hof July
Parade" and Delegate Authority to Issue Special Events/Street Closures
Permit to Director of Public Works/City Engineer.
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
,Steve Charette, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF
OLD TOWN FRONT STREET BETWEEN MORENO ROAD AND
2ND STREET; MAIN STREET FROM THE BRIDGE TO OLD TOWN
FRONT STREET; 2ND STREET; 3RD STREET; 4TH STREET; 5TH
STREET; 6TH STREET; AND MERCEDES STREET BETWEEN
MORENO ROAD AND 2ND STREET FOR THE "STAR SPANGLED
4TH OF JULY PARADE" AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS
PERMIT INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES
BACKGROUND: The Annual City -sponsored "Star Spangled 41h of July Parade'
necessitates temporary street closures to protect the participants and facilitate this event. The
subject special event requires the closure of entire, and portions of, streets in the Old Town area on
July 4, 2004 from approximately 5:00 AM until 4:00 PM. The parade hours are from 2:00 PM to
approximately 3:30 PM. However, staging for the parade will begin at 5:00 AM on Mercedes Street.
The police department will determine the exact hours of street closures. Also, no parking will be
allowed on these subject streets from 5:00 AM until 4:00 PM.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, 'Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those
highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for,
among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local
special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the
RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\2004 4TH OF JULY PARADE STREET CLOSURES.DOC
closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public rights -of -way.
This resolution set forth processes for staff reviewing applications, denying approval or approving
subject to conditions including events requiring changes in normal traffic patterns, and an appeal
process to the City Manager. However the resolution did not delegate authority to temporarily close
streets for these special events.
The subject resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the specific
event, the Temecula Community Services Department sponsored "Star Spangled 4'"of July Parade'
to the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All other special events requiring temporary street
closures, construction -related closures, etc, shall remain subject to the approval of the City Council
subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall
also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101.
Some partial closures, such as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for
block parties on cul-de-sac streets only do not require full street closures. These and similar partial
street closures or restrictions are not submitted for similar resolutions in order to reduce or eliminate
the administrative impact on City Council and staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, and for provision, placement, and retrieval of
necessary warning and advisorydevices bythe Temecula Community Services Department and the
City Maintenance Division are included in budgetary items.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2004-
2. Location Map
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\2004 4TH OF JULY PARADE STREET CLOSURES.DOC
RESOLUTION NO.2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF
OLD TOWN FRONT STREET BETWEEN MORENO ROAD AND
2ND STREET; MAIN STREET FROM THE BRIDGE TO OLD TOWN
FRONT STREET; 2ND STREET; 3RD STREET; 4TN STREET; 5TN
STREET; 6T" STREET; and MERCEDES STREET FROM MORENO
ROAD TO 2ND STREET FOR THE "STAR SPANGLED 4TN OF JULY
PARADE" AND AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS/CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT
INCLUDING STREET CLOSURES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula sponsors the annual "Star Spangled 41h of July Parade',
for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or
proposing to use that street or streets for the special event; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close public streets for this annual "Star Spangled 41h of July Parade; and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the annual "Star Spangled 41h of July Parade",
and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed
and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the
annual "Star Spangled 41h of July Parade' on July 4, 2004, and affirms the general rule that all other
temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 8`h day of June, 2004.
Jeffrey E. Stone, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\2004 4TH OF JULY PARADE STREET CLOSURES.DOC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No.2004- was dulyand regularly adopted bythe City Council of the Cityof Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8" day of June, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\2004 4TH OF JULY PARADE STREET CLOSURES.DOC
dSY
R
U
C
O
C
C
Q
d
O
O
N
d
Q
FM
O)
C_
45
d
a
C
E
d
•V N
a
d
o
Q
ro
am
p
o
�
'c
d
a
V
�
� �
L N
W
o
8
vaona�
Q$ VINNOdPIVD OHD�C
`.
y
ITEM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY :MP4_
DIRECTOR OF FINANC�
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: 1*illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Authorize TemporaryStreet Closure of Pauba Road between Margarita Road
and Ynez Road for the "July 41h, 2004 Fireworks Show' and Delegate
Authority to Issue Special Events/Street Closures Permit to Director of Public
Works/City Engineer.
PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
,Steve Charette, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF
PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD
FOR THE "JULY 4T" 2004, FIREWORKS SHOW", AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING
STREET CLOSURES
BACKGROUND: The Annual City -sponsored "July 41h 2004 Fireworks Show'
necessitates temporary street closures to protect the participants and facilitate this event. The
subject special event requires the closure of a portion of a major City highway and the streets
abutting this highway for a period of 11:00 AM until 11:00 PM on July 4, 2004.
Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, 'Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those
highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for,
among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local
special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the
closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street
during the temporary closing".
The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10,1991, which provided standards
and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public rights -of -way.
This resolution set forth processes for staff reviewing applications, denying approval or approving
subject to conditions including events requiring changes in normal traffic patterns, and an appeal
RAWGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\4TH OF JULY 2004 FIREWORKS.STREET CLOSURE.DOC
process to the City Manager. However the resolution did not delegate authority to temporarily close
streets for these special events.
The subject resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the specific
event, the Temecula Community Services Department sponsored "July 4\h 2004 Fireworks Show" to
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All other special events requiring temporary street
closures, construction -related closures, etc, shall remain subject to the approval of the City Council
subject to rules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall
also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101.
Some partial closures, such as limiting lane widths for construction purposes or partial closures for
block parties on cul-de-sac streets only do not require full street closures. These and similar partial
street closures or restrictions are not submitted for similar resolutions in orderto reduce or eliminate
the administrative impact on City Council and staff time.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, and for provision, placement, and retrieval of
necessary warning and advisory devices by the Temecula Community Services Department and the
City Public Works Maintenance Division are included in budgetary items.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution No. 2004-
2. Location Map
R:WGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804Y4TH OF JULY 2004 FIREWORKS.STREET CLOSURE.DOC
RESOLUTION NO.2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA, AUTHORIZING TEMPORARY STREET CLOSURE OF
PAUBA ROAD BETWEEN MARGARITA ROAD AND YNEZ ROAD
FOR THE "JULY 4T" 2004 FIREWORKS SHOW", AND
AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY
ENGINEER TO ISSUE SPECIAL EVENTS PERMIT INCLUDING
STREET.CLOSURES.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, The California State Vehicular Code provides for the promulgation of rules and
regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary
closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and
WHEREAS, The City of Temecula sponsors the annual "July 41h 2004 Fireworks Show", for
which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or
proposing to use that street or streets for the special event; and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily
close public streets for this annual "July 4th 2004 Fireworks Show" on July 4th, 2004; and,
NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the Director of Public Works/City
Engineer to approve temporary street closures for annual "July 4`h 2004 Fireworks Show", and to
establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and
approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby
authorizes the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the
annual "July 4th 2004 Fireworks Show' on July 4, 2004, and affirms the general rule that all other
temporary public street closures shall be approved or denied approval by the City Council.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 8th day of June, 2004.
Ron Roberts, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:WGENDA REPORTS\2004\0608O4\4TH OF JULY 2004 FIREWORKS.STREET CLOSURE.DOC
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that
Resolution No. 2004- was dulyand regularly adopted bythe City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 81h day of June, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES:
0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES:
0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT:
0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
R:WGENDA REPORTS\2004\06080A4TH OF JULY 2004 FIREWORKS.STREET CLOSURE.DOC
ITEM 8
CITY ATTORN EY
DIRECTOR OF Flf
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 31821 located on the south side of Remington Avenue,
approximately nine hundred (900) feet west of Diaz Road
PREPARED BY: hl Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Kendra Hannah, Junior Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve:
1) Parcel Map No. 31821 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval
2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security
for the agreement.
BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 31821 is a two (2) parcel subdivision for condominium
purposes located on the south side of Remington Avenue, approximately nine hundred (900) feet
west of Diaz Road. All Street improvements have been completed on Remington Avenue.
On December 18, 2003, the City of Temecula Planning Director approved Tentative Parcel Map
31821, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval.
The Developer, Remington Business Center, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company has met all
of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative parcel
map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the approved
tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report for Parcel Map No. 31821
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Parcel Map No. 31821
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PM 31821.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PM 31821
Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE
Flood Control (ADP)
Development Impact Fee
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Paid. This fee is due prior to issuance of a
grading permit.
Not Paid. This fee will be collected prior to
issuance of building permits.
RAGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PM 31821.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
PARCEL MAP NO.31821
DATE: June 8. 2004
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY
Street and Drainage
$ 0
$ 0
Water
$ 0
$ 0
Sewer
$ 0
$ 0
TOTAL
$ 0
$ 0
Monumentation
$ 1,000
-
DEVELOPMENT FEES
RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid
Development Impact Fee $ *TBD
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee $ 56.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 4.00
Plan Check Fee $ 790.00
Monument Inspection Fee $ 250.00
Fees Paid to Date $ 1100.00
Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00
`To Be Determined
3
RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PM 31821.doc
O
f-
C?
vz z
z
S h O a.
w
z @ r O
O £qa8 8 b h Zak In
a d e w
ZF €U .�
W zz ad e a� U
N.pt 88 Z :3e W Q h o
@g 3gg
a lfiln
o' Sp Sip i $p$ w?
O w4 $Y
o•■ s w h w
w
b m tt
YRRR m g �
La
w� � to
coo
�N ,i44yI
CO
O /y�� {Oap,Q6 N45S
o N
O
$ o
L � � 6 tl� •, a ¢ o yy[a[,�9
Fi 4W�h F a' 1W,5'YSA 60 Y�
w o0gg R 1 4d,9'PI
W s o
�„� �� � b� e• o � I I 4 � � s§
Ij I a o"
1 � q
� M9l fypt
I
o I �� Xm Lou. •.4.4.ax] `cPi �j 2
gill o <
y w
I YY U q�q� m
I bIG�Y n .11� m 4d
a };
a a
01
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Assessment District 03-04 (John Warner Road) Street and Storm Drain
Improvement Project — Project No. PW02-07
Increase Construction Contingency
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Appropriate $260,000 in General Fund Capital Project Reserves to fund the Rancho
California Water District (RCWD) facility relocation portion of the John Warner Road
Improvement Project.
2. Appropriate $280,000 in General Fund Capital Project Reserves to fully fund the
Assessment District 03-04 (John Warner Road) Street and Storm Drain Improvement
Project — Project No. PW02-07
Increase the project contingency, and the City Manager's contract change order approval
limit, by $200,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency.
BACKGROUND: On August 12, 2003 the City Council awarded a construction contract to
McLaughlin Engineering and Mining, Inc. (MEM) in the amount of $1,059,569.50, authorized the City
Manager to approve change orders not to exceed a 10% contingency or $105,956.95, and
authorized the use of General Fund reserves to fully fund the project. $124,500t of the original
contract was for RCWD relocations. A t the time of award the extent of all required Rancho
California Water District (RCWD) relocations was unknown and Council was advised that additional
funds may be required to complete the project.
Rancho California Water District
To date $80,000 of the project contingency has been used to fund contract change orders for
RCWD relocation work and an additional $40,000 is forthcoming. These additional RCWD costs
alone ($120,000) will exceed the City's 10% contingency for this project.
The design work required for the waterline relocation was authorized by Council action on July 8,
2004, with the award of a design contract totaling $16,845.00. The design contract was funded with
Capitol Project reserves appropriated for the project.
The City is proceeding with our litigation to recover all costs associated with of the relocation of
RCWD's facilities. Because the recovery of the RCWD related costs is pending a legal decision, it
is necessary to advance the funds to cover these expenses.
I
RAWGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PW0207John Warner Add'I Funds.DOC
Roadway/Storm Drain Change Orders
In addition to the water relocation extras the roadway/storm drain portion project has also had
several field condition changes and field revisions that total approximately $72,000. Staff calculates
an additional $95,000 will be required to cover the net contract item adjustments and any additional
unforeseen changes. Assessment District proceeds are available to cover a majority of the
roadway/storm drain additional contingency. The additional construction cost to the City is roughly
$19,000 above previous appropriations.
The City determined that the benefit to the City of having improved streets and storm drain systems
in this area warranted the City funding the completion of the design; the contract administration and
a portion of the storm drain construction. Unfortunately, the administrative costs for this project have
exceeded original administration allocation for this project. Construction delays caused by utility
relocations have more than doubled the time required to complete the project. In addition, an
extraordinary amount of time has been spent on coordinating the various utilities and the necessary
field revisions. A major portion of the requested additional appropriation will be utilized to cover the
administration costs.
A summary of the use of funds is presented in the following table:
Total Construction
Admin & Design Expenditures $ 350,000.00 $ 16,845.00
(Proiected thru Completion)
Total Admin/Design/Const
Assessment District Bond Proceeds $ 1,030,457.50 $ 0.00
Capital Project Reserves $ 65,000.00 $ 0.00
(Storm Drain Construction)
Capital Project Reserves $ 90,000.00 $ 0.00
Admin & Design)
Total Aoorooriations to Date $ 1,185,457.50 $ 0.00
FISCAL IMPACT: The construction of the John Warner Street and Storm Drain Improvement
Project is funded with Assessment District No 03-04 (John Warner Road) bond proceeds and
Capitol Project Reserves. The $260,000 appropriation from the Capital Reserves will adequately
fund all the RCW D related work. Appropriating $280,000 of Capital Project Reserves to the project
account, Account No. 274-199-727-580' will provide adequate funds to complete the project.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Location Map
2. Project Description
3. Change Order Summary/Contingency Balance
2
R:WGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PW0207John Wamer Add'I Funds.DOC
rJ'
M-
z�
o
oS
8
.. y 0
S ono'
00
o �
V U
v
v
V)6.)
w�
O
o
�
N
o
N
0
O pOp
j O O
]O N M
wn
b
O
O O
O
00
0.
ON
Q4 V% I'll
0
01p0p
O
O
O
M
O
vil `gIfill II
ap
G
V
p
G
�
W
�
o
y
"�i
U2
O
O
•
•N
Y
2V
iJ � N
L
V
Q
U
U A F
W
v�
RECEIVED
MAR 2 6 2004
City of Temecula RCWD
T432
ic Works Department
0 Business Park Drive•Temecula, CA 92590•Mailing Address: PO. Box 9033•Temecula, CA 92589-9033
694-641 1 • Fax i909i 694-6475
J
Rancho California Water District
Steve Brannon, Development Engineer Manager
PO Box 9017
Temecula, CA 92589-9017
RE: Waterline Extension — Letter of Understanding
Dear Steve:
March 23, 2004
PROD. NO. PW02-07
DESC. John Warner Road
Improvement Project
As we've discussed on numerous occasions, the City of Temecula (City) and Rancho California Water
District (RCWD) have agreed that it is in the best interest of the residents/property owners on La Presa
Loop that a permanent extension of the existing water main in John Warner Road, which terminates near
Colver Court, be constructed in lieu of establishing additional "remote" service laterals.
The extension would benefit 3 parcels on La Presa Loop, namely APN 945-120-009-0 (Verano), 945-120-
008-5 (Castillo), 945-120-007-4 (Simonetti). The Verano property is currently served by a remote water
service near Colver Court. At the time the remote service was installed RCWD collected fees for the
Verano's fair share contribution of a future extension of the water main and relocation of the remote
service. Presently the Castillo's have expressed interest in developing their property and will need to pay
water service connection fees. The future development of the Simonetti property is unknown at this time.
In an effort to coordinate the waterline extension with the current road improvement project, the City and
RCWD have agreed to assist in funding such an extension. RCW D's preliminary estimates indicate the
cost of such an extension would be about $103,000. Dividing this on a per acre basis amongst the 3-
benefitting property owners results in a $10,259/acre spread. Verano and Castillo would each be
assessed $25,W. Verano's share would be covered by their previous fees paid at the time the remote
meter was installed, with any shortfall covered by RCWD. Castillo's share would be paid by the property
owner. The $51,704 shortfall would be split equally by the City and RCWD with reimbursement eligible
from the Simonetti property water service connection fees collected at the time of development. The City
and RCWD will also pursue additional contributions from Castillo and Verano as they will no longer have to
relocate remote water service lines.
This letter is intended to serve as a letter of understanding while the formal reimbursement agreement is
finalized. At this time the City is moving forward with a professional services agreement for the design of
the waterline extension. All costs incurred by the City in designing the waterline extension will be counted
toward the City's contribution.
R1Ct"ROJECTS\M02TW02-07 John Warer4etlem5 0040323 RCWDunde Mnd.doc
® Printed on Re ytled Paper - -
If you have any questions or require any additional information, please contact me at (909) 694-6411.
Sincerely,
GrejipaltlEn
er, P.E.
Pringineer—CIP
cc: File 9a
Please indicate your concurrence with this letter by signing in the space below.
.�/ cl a w�
Steve Brannon Date
Development Engineer Manager, RCWD
Edward . "Bob" lemons, P.E. Date
Director of Engineering
RUC1"ROJECTSWW02WW02-07 John WamwV.ellers12W 323 RCWDunde tand.dx
Page 1 of 2
Change Order Summary/Contingency Balance
John Warner AD
PW02-07
ITEM
RESP DESCRIPTION
TOTAL
Responsibility: R =RCWD; C = City
CCO 1
1.1
R
12" CML&C Relocation
$
36,641.05
C
R
Prime Mark-up
$
2,082.06
$
38,723.11
CCO 2
2.1
R
Relocate RCWD Water Service Lati
$
31,072.04
2.2
R
Repair Unmarked RCWD line
$
2,283.87
C
$
33,355.91
CCO 3
3.1
C
Redesign storm drain segment
$
1,395.55
3.2
C
Construct redesigned storm drain
$
7,275.00
3.3
C
Additional survey staking
$
3,850.00
$
12,520.55
Pending/Potential Change Orders
Known
PCO 1
C
Remove trees & masonry - Lolita Rc
$
3,327.37
$
3,327.37
PCO 2
R
RCWD main line potholing
$
1,051.66
$
1,051.66
PCO 3
C
Add'I drainage install - JW Rd
$
3,892.23
$
3,892.23
PCO 4
RL
Verano high line
$
6,902.19
$
6,902.19
PCO 5
C
Cabrillo drainage revisions
$
6,507.74
$
6,507.74
Estimated
C
Reynolds Drvwy C&G/EW
$
3,000.00
$
3,000.00
C
Colver Ct. Drainage fix
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
R
Lolita Grade Adjust Waterline
$
10,000.00
$
10,000.00
C
Lolita Grade Adjust Driveways
$
45,000.00
$
45,000.00
R
Airvac - Readjust
$
870.00
$
870.00
C
Unknown extrawork
$
25,000.00
$
25,000.00
Subtotal Agreed to CCO's
$
200,150.76
Disputed Extrawork
DCO 1
C
Slope Restoration Work
$
3,486.69
$
3,486.69
DCO 2
C
Pavement Edge Restoration
$
3,366.31
$
3,366.31
DCO 3
C
SW PPP Damage - Utility Delay
$
6,029.33
$
6,029.33
Subtotal Disputed work
$
12,882.33
Page 2 of 2
Change Order Summary/Contingency Balance
John Warner AD
PW02-07
ITEM RESP DESCRIPTION
Contract Item Overage/underage
Known
C
Residential Driveway App
C
AC Dike
R
Relocate Water Meter
R
Adjust Valve Cover to Grade
C
18" RCP
C
36" RCP
C
42" RCP D-2000
C
21' Catch Basin
C
1/2 ton RSP
C
Cutoff Wall
R
Relocate Air -Vac
R
8"CML&C
Projected
C
Unclassified Ex
Total Items Over/Under
Beginning Contingency (10%)
Additional Allocation
Adjusted Balance
Contract Change orders
Disputed EW
Item Over/underruns
Contingency Deficit
2550 @ $2.30
7359 @ $4.50
5 @ $950.00
2 @ $150.0.
1 @ $50.00
-3 @ $67.00
-7.2 @ $104.00
2 @ $6500
68 @ $56.00
-34 @ 350
1 @ $870
402 @ $56.00
2550 @ $10.00
$
105,956.95
$
105,956.95
$
200,150.76
$
12,882.33
$
96,920.20
TOTAL
5,865.00
33,115.00
4,750.00
300.00
50.00
(201.00)
(748.80)
13,000.00
3,808.00
(11,900.00)
870.00
22,512.00
25,500.00
96,920.20
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAL
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: FY2003/2004 Year End CIP Project Account Reconciliation
Administrative and Legal Fees
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer —CIP
Julie Dauer, CIP Specialist
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Appropriate $60,000 to the Rancho California Road Widening and Median Modifications
East of Ynez project from General Fund Capital Project Reserves.
2. Appropriate $85,000 to the Diaz Road Realignment project from General Fund Capital
Project Reserves.
BACKGROUND: On August 12, 2003, the City Council approved a contract for the construction
of the Rancho California Road Widening and Median Modifications East of Ynez Project (the
Rancho/Ynez Project) and authorized the transfer of Capital Project Reserves from the Pavement
Rehabilitation Program to the Rancho/Ynez Project to fully fund the construction contract. Because
the construction contract encumbered the majority of the funds in project account, the construction
administration costs incurred subsequent to the award of the construction contract have exceeded
the original appropriation. The requested $60,000.00 appropriation is an administrative adjustment
to re -appropriate funds to cover the construction administration costs.
On April 20, 2004, the City Council approved a contract for the construction/installation of two traffic
signals, one on Diaz Road at Rancho Way and the second Rancho California Road at Business
Park Drive; Phase 1 of the Diaz Road Realignment Project, project number PW95-27. The
necessary legal fees incurred to date during the land acquisition process have depleted the project
account to the extent that administrative costs incurred for design, project management, and
construction will exceed the original appropriation for project administration. The requested
$85,000.00 appropriation is necessary to cover the administrative costs of the Diaz Road
Realignment project.
R:WGENDA REPORT5'2004\0808NV\ 0304 Account RecondleCR.DOC
FISCAL IMPACT: The Rancho/Ynez and Diaz Road Realignment projects are Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) Projects funded with Capital Project Reserves. The John Warner Road
project is a CIP project funded with both Capital Project Reserves and Assessment District Bond
Proceeds. The $60,000 appropriation for to the Rancho/Ynez Project will be reflected in account
No. 210-165-611-5801. The $85,000 appropriation for the Diaz Realignment project will be reflected
in account No. 210-165-632-5801.
ATTACHMENT:
1. Project Location — Rancho/Ynez
2. Project Description — Rancho/Ynez
3. Project Location — Diaz Realignment
4. Project Description — Diaz Realignment
R:\AGENDA REPORTSV004\060804\E 03 04 Account RewncileCR.DOC
d
F
d
z�
w
O
E-F
Wz
o0F
�- U
g:O
0
ZA
qWF
aw
OF
d' ra
U2
xc
z
z
�aa
9
i-312
Q
o
0
0
0
o
00
C
F::o�oM000rn
0
0
0
0
0
0 0
�+
rj
d'
64
�d
N O�
C
��R++•
G
W
'D
m
N
M
M \O
V
p
N
dt
O,
U
sv
09
cn
v>
vi
v� yr
40
W
Go
kl
0
0
N
n
o
to
o
0
O
N
O
M
\0
�o
ss
v�
vi
cfl
vy
0
O
Vl
V1
M
N
T
O
V
.
cn
vj
v3
ss
0
0
0
CD
0
o
o
--�
N
�
N
cn
M IIr
N
N
696q
��Q
y
v
y
M
0
o
N
cl
a
�
A
N
r
U
G
o
W
$
C
p
G
p
Q
w
`
0
U
y
pU
y
}y
d
A
C
C
G
y
^y .`d.
w+
p
4<UUA
c F
fz
W
Em
a
F
d
0
MA
a 1 1 1
3
C
O
0
o
0
0
0
0
W
0
h
�tl
y
O
kn
h
O\
O1
O
O
vi
N
O
ao
G7
c'a
O
--�
N
m
t-
U
U
V
V at
a
O
U
69
69
(n
69
6S
O
3
o
Pk
0
A
c
U
o
O P:
J.,
N
x
a
w
>
CD
W)
rn
a
O u
7
qq�.
�O
N
M
�
M
O
b
M N
.A
N
N
p
69
69
69
64
p
3
x
0
LD
t,
0
00
0
Ln
Q
U
o
w
o
Cl
vi
-It
0n
T
10
N
C4
C
O
O
O-
W
00
•❑d
N
�D
d'
t '
ON
Oa
00❑
N
N
P
• O/-.
69
69
64
69 69
O
cEE
w0
N
w
b 3
77
N
ti
C
V p
A
N
O
CC
pip «
•� O
O
O
O
Go
N
O
O
w❑❑y
`� 3
M
V1
,-�
N
t`
bD
>
H
H V
O
a
N
69
64
vi
a
s
3
u 0uAA
O
ob
U
3>
3 v
v�
00
d
0
cV
N
..N.
w
kq
Orn
�O M
CS,
�,
8&
a
y 3
v
W
ea
ANC
00"
00
o
r"
a
o
s
oLr.
ti
d
•O
O
O�
O
N
w
y
y
30
.~V-
64
69
69
69 69
64
U
V
�
U
N
h
q
h
O
f.
w
Lei
N
•�
U
U
O
O
Y"
dUUAF
wro
z
a
b
C)
C)
0
ol
:3
CD
CD
0
0
0
0
F
00
.
og
a
v
Nf
Ni
Nf
Nf
O
O
N
69 Ni l N' 11
0
0
0
0
0
°-°
06
en
000
0
rn
o
a
a
N
'y
64
69
Ni
6s
69
N)
Ni 69
ao
q
U
C
W
V
�
o
o
F
d
U
U
A F
N
ITEM 11
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: V*illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Tract Map No. 29798-8, Located South of Loma Linda Road, East of
Pechanga Parkway, North of Wolf Valley Road, in the Wolf Creek Specific
Plan No. 12 EIR
PREPARED BY: "1 Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of ,Pyblic Works
Chris White, Assistant Engineer e-
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Tract Map No. 29798-8 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material
Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Tract Map No. 29798-8 is located within Tract 29305-1 of the Wolf
Creek Specific Plan No. 12. As part of Specific Plan, Tract Map No. 29798-8 is subject to all
Specific Plan Amendments and Agreements.
On January 23, 2001 the City Council approved Tentative Tract Map 29305, on December 16, 2003
the City Council approved Final Map 29305-1.On November 7, 2001 they approved Tentative Tract
Map 29798 with a phasing map and their conditions of approval which is a further subdivision of
Tract 29305-1.
Tract Map No. 29798-8 is a forty-nine (49) single family residential lot tract and four (4) lettered lots.
The tract is located South of Loma Linda Road, North of Wolf Valley Road East of Pechanga
Parkway. The site is currently vacant.
The owners of the property:
Wolf Creek Development, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company has met all of the Conditions
of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative tract map. The approval of
a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the approved tentative map, is a
mandatory ministerial act under State Law.
The following fees have been deferred for Tract Map No. 29798-8
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of building permit.
rAagdrpt\04/tm29798,-1,-2,. ma p
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
Development Fee Checklist
Fees & Securities Report
Project Vicinity Map
Tract Map No. 29798-8
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. TM 29798-8
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP) N/A
Quimby Fees N/A
Development Impact Fee To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
rAagdrpt\041tm29798,-1,-2,.ma p
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
TRACT MAP NO. 29798-8
DATE: June 8. 2004
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
MATERIAL
SECURITY
& LABOR
Street and Drainage
$
230,000
$
115,000
Water
$
56,000
$
28,000
Sewer
$
86,000
$
43,000
TOTAL
$
372,000
$
186,000
Monument
$
10,500
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
Development Impact Fee
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
Plan Check Fee
Monument Inspection Fee
Fees Paid to Date
Balance of Fees Due
$ 0.00
$ N/A
$ 0.00
$ 149.00
$ 8.00
$ 2,110.00
$ 525.00
$ 2,792.00
$ 0
3
r:tagdrpt%04/tm29798,-1,-2,.map
TRACT No. 29798-8
WOLF CREEK SPECIFIC PLAN
REDHAWK PARKWAY
WOLF VALLEY ROAD
PROJECT SITE
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
w G a w. �
EIM
�
Z I PITH!
�z
N34
Sn
46
if
_Al a a _ g a a
<
z
00
0
W 1
4
o ' ,
Op
ti rn a
s
o k0
36 �wyga �QYgs ¢
Z o< e3 g�7asd
W
Rio
Z
w Bkr P o3bo �
Hai a ,kA���� �a� n� �xoa € eTjk
1411
xwp
13
PER
kY�iF z°f qyb w
< H < g E gs� g N+M "
r��izo . �®$ $j
e3 Ah
h-1
C4
$ IFba
zM
00
V i
1s �^ III 10A.
jLom 1 _oanwm rh
--- - _ _ r---'7`1
III a
b coCIO uj
!. o I I I III£
----- I I m
1 li 1I'-- __�
VI agaegaq a I PAS N0�•1 r0ow
i !
r-gq'19e-�.90
b -1--
W 1,
b _-- �1 � -^• I r I I � m SIIf
k���
�
w I�l}.o
1, IIL� °N 179FSZ� aI — - i
\\ �IIONNO
NO
<�°Na'
i
Lo
tit 1 i
Ci
�\ � �♦ 1 IUpN I I
I
a
x
`e w Ob
fie A j ii W
X.j J6111 5111
• ■ 0 8: �IW3 GCE ��i6� �nh �iii 3
E,
n(
co
3 nl )
W
H �l avoa A�nvn 0ooM 3 \'� _
[.00�ssai _.o_a000+w—
i
[W Gsrm�� .00.sso�u .eases-v)
N
y �
Z Re I gJ� N� PEE,r a i rQ0. c�D
Wl R II �I A A n I( a
�Qt`-cc 0
.ryKJ T
lot
Q r
01
1
C)
W .$p$909
d 9A+MR
P �"
�i73�IIIICHII
a
tl
a
n
9��
('
NWet
yAytt
El��Of���i�Jf�aa��dGr'i1���l0af�0000000000�00000�i000�989000nOn0000099Onn01
o�000�o�o����o����o�0000�oo�0000�00000000�00000�000�000000000000i
a! 1
MI_ I
1
Olgaa �4
�r \ N \ \
nst 1 \ n \ '—i
ITEM 12
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Resolution Adopting FY 2004-2005 Solid Waste Rates
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst'
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the existing solid waste franchise agreement with C R & R
Incorporated the rates charged for refuse and recycling for residential and commercial services in
the City of Temecula are subject to annual review and modification. The franchise agreement
provides for adjustments based upon changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and Riverside
County landfill tipping fees. The CPI increase as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau
of Labor Statistics -Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange Co; All Urban Consumers is 2.6%. The County of
Riverside Waste Management Department has increased their tipping fee by 1.8% for FY 2004-
2005 at county landfills.
The solid waste commercial rates for fiscal year 2004-2005 reflect the 2.6% CPI increase and 1.8%
increase in the tipping fee. The TCSD Board of Directors will review the single-family residential
refuse and recycling collection rate on June 8, 2004 as a part of the proposed TCSD Rates and
Charges for FY 2004-2005.
The attached Exhibit "D" reflects the new rates for solid waste collection for all collection services to
become effective July 1, 2004.
RAsmithb\Trash\04-05 Rates-Staff.doc
FISCAL IMPACT: No additional costs will be borne by the City of Temecula since these
services are paid for directly by the customers receiving the services.
Attachments: Resolution
Exhibit "D"
U.S. Department of Labor, Consumer Price Index
Riverside County, Waste Management Department Letter
RAsm1thb\Trash\04-05 Rates-Staff.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 04_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE RATES FOR
FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does find, determine and declare
that:
a. The City of Temecula (the "City') and CR & R Incorporated ( the "Grantee") entered
into an exclusive franchise agreement on May 28, 1991 for the collection, transportation, recycling,
composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary
bin/rolloff services in the City.
b. The franchise agreement provides for periodic rate adjustments based on certain
predefined criteria, specifically annual Consumer Price Index ("CPI") adjustments and landfill tipping
fee adjustments.
C. The franchise agreement further provides a formula to calculate the fee adjustments
to be made to the agreement on an annual basis.
d. The CPI adjustment is 2.6% for fiscal year 2004-2005.
e. There is a 1.8% increase to the tipping fee adjustment for fiscal year 2004-2005.
f. The franchise agreement provides that the solid waste fee adjustments are to be
adopted by the City Council by Resolution.
Section 2. That the City of Temecula approves the solid waste fee adjustments as
shown in Exhibit "D" for fiscal year 2004-2005.
Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the Resolution.
W: smidlbUmsh\04-05 Races Reso.dm
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of
Temecula this 8th day of June, 2004.
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
Michael S. Nagger
Mayor
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2004 by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
R:\smthb\T.sh\04-05 Rams Reso.dm
01
93
0
CITY of TEMECULA
Exhibit "D"
Schedule of Rates
(effective July 1, 2004)
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer,
and disposal grantee billing
Monthly Rate:
$ 15.06
Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer,
and disposal parcel charge
Monthly Rate:
$ 15.06
Mechanized single family detached residential additional refuse, and composting container
grantee billing
Monthly Rate:
$ 6.18
Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up - grantee billing
Pick Up Rate:
$ 7.45
5. Commercial. industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic
yard bin) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$ 72.07
2 x week
$ 144.14
3 x week
$ 216.21
4 x week
$ 288.28
5 x week
$ 360.35
6 x week
$ 432.42
7 x week
$ 504.49
Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
Q
7
R
Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$ 83.29
2 x week
$ 166.58
3 x week
$ 249.87
4 x week
$ 333.16
5 x week
$ 416.45
6 x week
$ 499.74
7 x week
$ 583.03
Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly: 2.5 x monthly rate
Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential reeycline monthly bin rates ( one 3
cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$ 37.66
2 x week
$ 75.32
3 x week
$ 112.98
4 x week
$ 150.64
5 x week
$ 188.30
6 x week
$ 225.96
7 x week
$ 263.62
Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic
yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$ 94.54
2 x week
$ 189.08
3 x week
$ 283.62
4 x week
$ 378.16
5 x week
$ 472.70
6 x week
$ 567.24
7 x week
$ 661.78
Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate
9.
Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential recycline monthly bin rates one 4
cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week:
1 x week
$ 49.86
2 x week
$ 99.72
3 x week
$149.58
4 x week
$199.44
5 x week
$249.30
6 x week
$299.16
7 x week
$349.02
10.
Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate:
$ 72.91 per load
11.
Extra 3 cubic yard pick up:
$ 37.97 pick up
12.
Redeliver and reinstatement rate: _
$ 31.20 per occurrence
13.
Roll -off disposal rate:
$173.65 MRF/landfill fee
14.
Roll -off recycling rate:
$173.65 plus market valve
15.
Roll -off compactor rate:
$241.75 MRF/landfill fee
16.
Roll -off recycling compactor rate:
$241.75 plus market valve
17.
"Hard to service" vehicle usage rate:
no charge
18.
"Hard to service" bin moving rate:
no charge
19.
Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate:
no charge
20.
Deodorizing / replacing bin rate:
no charge
D M
Q
V
M M1 r [+: M
C, �(: m M :p
L:
Z N
_ a
q_
t0 ni D VI
r m ^ N a
1� f` NW
M1 N M1
QOl
2C
C
^.r-^ ^M
C N^'VJ-t0
W W
^oJq
gW
QW
LU
�O
c
U
Z
Z
iy rQ
N m
uJ N
if!
J
f
r r r
1 '^ I-
t- r r
7 1` O
a G N c N� a M w a n n
M .T)
OO ON -O W m he Me
O M of C '� C� W )V W O (7 C- . ((J n
Z - h M f^, e C I[) N N f) tp fp Is M1 M1 fD W
R q LO O O 5 M
U O (" to Q 'J C] N q O M N W_ C] F- Ct (O M M1
^ N M M 4< N h N N tC W W M1 A W W
r r r r r - -rrr - -rrr - - -
a
W W- M. Q Q VCl ¢) N h t0 O LO h W W
-rrr - r r r r r --
C� pm W o:m na W oQ mn pmN Roa
W ^- W. D I- W
J q tV q N W N •- fG W VV W N v7 W N W
.']_!�O ro NM1M W M1C Nd'� MMM
� m N 4: N C N O W Oi ` V tC Oi Ni N C c0 r LO
Q O
C W r' ' N W S
^ ^ M
M1 W M O M1 - M. W W C W N W
C¢ O r N^ e R C- N ^ O O^- ^ W-
1
N ^]t> r S O f0 fD C) 1t) 6] lG C M M M Ql (O
Y
0
is
IM M1 c: t- N - W N r m N M In In e M1 O M
N e Q N Lj PI M Ni M N N
fW O N- M1 n- O ^. W O{ M M T W, W r
^- C� 4: v5 C M M r- r - N N M N M
-- W N W W W W O W Q W Q M- - n q
N 'l Q N ID N M N- O N -_ N M N M. r
N C 4i C W M M N O r N r .- (V li (V m �-
'r N W W n C7 M., n n N C^ c M S WON
M e C R W m m �' �'- r N r - N M N M N
N rm r.� cM1pv, w, u)In mm v) tW LW ^
MOM,- Q M1- M W WNM
N V t, u. R" N -- N -- N M M N N
N j V M1 e
N C Q r N
M
M c e n Jl C th N^ r r r r Cj IV (�l to M
UN- afl tL N Y^. n I!) C N [O m W e 0 m N-
tO to O IfJ C' Gf t[` P (V C m G� M1 W m e C R 4 LC C) C ai _ r .- - .- N M N M-
Q WIn
M
M1 '
W M m n n Gi n W 6:
W W O ---- I
Q N -r-
- O -
� T
h
Z 41 M W O O - e O C M N N O M W M1 N W
tf. O r: eJ Q N O R O) N R V) ?- 4 R •^ N GO j R N< C LO W M tt fV - O N N N M N M r
m momw" m°dimm ' mmmrno tyM 6'!
w mrnm�' c)v nM �ssMrnS000
h`.
5
mmmmSi srn �', gs'. m Tmo o"doS
' N N fJ 2
Riverside County
Waste Mananement Denai
Hans W. Kernkamp, General Manager -Chief Engineer
April 6, 2004
TO: Riverside County Waste Management Account Holders
FROM: Hans W. Kernkamp, General Manager -Chief Engineer /044/
Riverside County Waste Management Department
RE: Proposed Disposal Fee Increase
The County of Riverside Waste Management Department is responsible for assuring that there is,
and will be in the future, sufficient and accessible landfill space to properly serve the population
of the County in its disposal needs. To fulfill this mandate, the Department has acquired various
pieces of land, maintained and expanded County landfill sites, and encouraged and developed
recycling programs that minimize the dependence on landfill disposal sites.
We have been fortunate that we have been able to operate in this manner and maintain the
disposal fee without an increase for over 10 years; in fact, reducing the direct haul rate from
$38.50 to $30 per ton in FY 96/97. However, a recent review of the increased costs for
operation, especially with regards to safety issues, and the projections of future expansion costs
have made the Department management aware that the current disposal fee will need to be
increased for FY 04/05. This increase, limited by the Consumer Price Index (CPI) and allowed
for in our Waste Delivery Agreements, will allow the Department to remain fiscally sound. Per
the Waste Delivery Agreements, we anticipate presenting our recommendation to move forward
with a public hearing before the Riverside County Board of Supervisors at least 45 days prior to
implementation of the gate fee increase (targeting a mid -May Board meeting). Future gate fee
increases, if needed, will follow the same process and be evaluated on a yearly basis. The FY
04/05 estimated gate fee increase is projected to be in the range of 40 to 55 cents per ton and
would be effective for tonnage deliveries starting on July 1, 2004.
We thank you for your past support and cooperation and appreciate the careful consideration and
understanding that this proposed increase will engender.
cc: Robert Byrd, Auditor Controller
Barbara Dunmore/Kathy Gifford, Executive Office
William Katzenstein/I.ee Vinocour, County Counsel
Damian Meins, Dept. of Environmental Health
$30.° /+0 , O I.7-1/0 = 't.54
ROCS_GENERAL #20680-vl-Rate_Incm=—.DOC
14310 Frederick Street • Moreno Valley, CA 92553 • (909) 486-3200 • Fax (909) 486-3205 • Fax (909) 486-3230
www. rivcowm. org
nrinted on recvcled naner
ITEM 13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEYTAZW
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 8, 2004 ��JJ
SUBJECT: Implementation of Special Tax - Measure C
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst Wv
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2004-2005 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES
PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING,
AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and
Recreation and Arterial Street Lighting Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were
replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services special tax approved by the voters as
Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services special tax is to provide
for the ongoing operations, maintenance, and servicing of the City's public park and recreation
facilities, recreational and human services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and
traffic signals.
The Parks/Street Lighting Services special tax is levied in the same manner, at the same time as the
TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bill for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
The maximum annual tax has been established at $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit;
$55.84 per multi -family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential
zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-
residential improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for
rRAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Special Tax -Staff Report.doc
agricultural uses.
For Fiscal Year 2004-2005, the total proposed operating budget for parks, recreation, medians, and
arterial street lighting services is $7,464,100.
The total possible revenue received at the current rate from all taxable parcels within the City for
Fiscal Year 2004-2005 is $2,763,532. The difference in operating costs over levy revenue is offset
by fund balance transfers, recreational revenues and user fees, and REST Program contributions.
Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount of the
tax levy each fiscal year, approved by the voters, not to exceed the maximum tax rates identified
above. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied as a special tax for Fiscal Year
2004-2005, be less than the maximum amounts established by City Ordinance No. 96-21, in the
following manner:
$ 63.44 per single family residential dwelling unit
$ 47.58 per multi -family residential dwelling unit
$ 126.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone
$ 253.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
$ 380.64 per acre of non-residential improved property
$ 126.88 per acre of golf course property
$ 31.72 per acre of agricultural property
In keeping with the City Council's continued practice of trying to reduce fees to our property owners
whenever possible, and even though it is allowable for the City Council to approve this year's
Special Tax at the maximum rate, the above recommended Special Tax is a $11.00 per equivalent
benefit unit (EBU) savings from the maximum rate of $74.44 per EBU. In addition, this will be the
ninth consecutive year that the Revenue Excess Sharing in Temecula (REST) program has
contributed to the overall reduction in the rates for parks, recreation, and street lighting services.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Special Tax levy at the proposed rates will generate $2,763,532.
The remaining funds necessary to complete the Parks/Lighting Services budget will be derived from
fund balance, recreation revenue, user fees, and general fund contributions.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to Levy Special Tax.
rRAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Special Tax -Staff Report.doc
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR
2004-2005 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES
PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF
PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING,
AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA HEREBY FINDS,
RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California
Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council
adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula approved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and
assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year,
commencing with fiscal year 1997-98.
Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year as
established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.84 per
multi -family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone,
$297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non-residential
improved property, $148.88 per acre of golf course property, and $37.22 per acre for agricultural
uses.
Section 3. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to
establish the amounts of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to exceed the
maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an adequate
level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance.
Section 4. The City Council hereby determines that the following amounts are
required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in
Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following amounts to be levied as a special tax for
fiscal year 2004-2005, which amounts are less than the maximum amounts established by
Ordinance No. 96-21 and approved by voters:
$ 63.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit
$ 47.58 per multi -family residential dwelling unit
$126.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone
$253.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone
$380.64 per acre of non-residential improved property
$126.88 per acre of golf course property
$ 31.72 per acre of agricultural property
Section 5. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same
dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and
collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together
with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied
until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall,
until paid, constitute a personal obligation to the City of Temecula by the persons who own the
parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of
property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency,
RAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Special Tax-Reso.doc 06/10/03
correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to the special tax, except for
California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831.
Section 6. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special fund to
be used only for the purposes of financing recreational and human services programs, and the
operation, maintenance, and servicing of public parks and recreational facilities, median
landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and
administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith.
Section 7. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state
governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is
exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution
or any paramount law.
Section 8. The City Clerk is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to
the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 11, 2004, the property tax
roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is
hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make
collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary
therefor.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions the
levy of the special tax against such property owner's property, such property owner must appeal the
levy by filing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to
procedures established by the City.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of
the special tax for fiscal year 2004-2005 would create a hardship for that property owner during that
fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the City Clerk
before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to procedures established by the City, in order to
be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any
person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,
such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this
end the provisions of this Resolution are declared to be severable. The City Council does hereby
declare that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause,
phrase, part or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections,
clauses, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared invalid or unconstitutional.
Section 12. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
R:\smithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Special Tax-Reso.doc
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 8th
day of June 2004.
Michael S. Nagger, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 2004- _ was duly adopted by
the City Council of the City of Temecula at the regular meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of
June 2004, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS
RAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Special Tax-Reso.doc
ITEM 14
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: n City Manager/City Council
FROM: 1Ai11\William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: Ilia June 08, 2004
SUBJECT: Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Phase II Project No. PW02-26
Agreement for Geotechnical and Material Testing Services
PREPARED BY: / mer Attar, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
l� Iayra De La Torre, Associate Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve an agreement with Converse Consultants in an amount not to exceed $33,075.00 to
provide as needed geotechnical and material testing services for the Jefferson Avenue
Pavement Rehabilitation Phase II, Project No. PW02-26, and authorize the Mayor to execute
the agreement.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the
contingency amount of $3,307.50, which is equal to 10% of the agreement amount.
BACKGROUND: On May 25, 2004, the City Council awarded a construction contract for Jefferson
Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Phase ll, from south of Overland Drive to Rancho California Road,
Project No. PW02-26, to Griffith Company. This pavement rehabilitation project will require
geotechnical, materials testing and special inspection services.
City staff evaluated four (4) proposals received for geotechnical and materials testing services for the
subject project. Converse Consultants was selected to provide the required, professional services
based upon their experience with similar projects, previous work performed in Riverside County and
their expertise with specific task assignments.
R:\AGENDA REPORTSQ004\060804\PW02-26 Geotechnical.DOC
FISCAL IMPACT: Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II is a Capital Improvement
Program Project funded with Measure A and Capital Project Reserves. Adequate funds are available
in Account No. 210-165-621-5805 to cover the total project cost of $36,382.50, which includes the
contract amount of $33,075.00 plus 10% contingency of $3,307.50.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Location
2. Project Description
3. Agreement with Converse Consultants
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\060804\PW02-26 Geotechnical.DOC
d
H
V
W
O
L
a
z�
\
c
2
/
§
2
�
2
\\\
\/\
\
�_
___
-
)>4
|
\
\
(
2
pa
ƒrr
\
f
eq
_
_
/
\C,
Cl\
CD
Cl
]kk
)r
/»#2
/
)
�
_
§
4
e
co
)]))
./
^_®
4
§o
e]
k$000
&/_
■w
7)30±zn
2
_ q _|
m
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
JEFFERSON AVENUE PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PHASE II
PROJECT NO. PW02-26
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of June 8, 2004, between the City of
Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City') and Converse Consultants ("Consultant"). In
consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on June 8, 2004, and shall remain
and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 8,
2005, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be
obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Consultant shall provide a copy of prevailing
wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a
minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5,
1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion
thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
5. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B other than the payment rates and
schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Thirty Three Thousand
Seventy Five Dollars and No Cents ($33,075.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless
additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
t
R:\CIP\ProjectsIPW02-26\Agreements\Converse Conslts Agreement
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services.
The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the
Agreement or $25,000.00, but in no event shall the total sum of the agreement exceed twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of a invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manageror his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its
designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, togetherwith supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computerfiles containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and otherdocuments prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the Citywithout the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to
property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any
way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising
out of the negligence of the City.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property,
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 1185 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
3
R:\CIP\ProjectsIPW02-26\Agreements\Converse Conslts Agreement
(4) Professional L lability I nsurance s hall b e w ritten o n a p olicy f orm
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) peroccurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial
General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate
limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident
for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4) Professional Liability coverage: One million ($1,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Covera-ge. Consultant s hall f urnish t he C ity w ith o riginal
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at anytime or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in anyway affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, I etters of s upport, testimony at d epositions, response to i nterrogatories o r other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding: Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review
any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
parry under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that parry may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City: City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: Converse Consultants
10391 Corporate Drive
Redlands, California 92374
Attention: Hashmi S.E. Quazi, Regional Manager
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any partthereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without priorwritten consent ofthe
City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for
actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise
agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant.
16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one parry against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses forthe relief granted.
18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of
the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise,
in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this
project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered
whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral orwritten, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CIVIC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Converse Consultants
10391 Corporate Drive
Redlands, CA 92374
(909) 796-0544
Hashmi S.E. Quazi, COB/Regional Manager
Print or Type Name
Print or Type Title
(Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations)
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
Professional Geotechnical and Material Testing
Jefferson Avenue Rehabilitation— Phase II
Project No. PW02-26
g
R:1CIP\ProjectsIPW02-26\Agreements\Converse Conslts Agreement
Converse Consultants
Over 60 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences
May 21, 2004
Ms. Mayra De LaTorre, P.E.
Associate Engineer —Capital Projects
Department of Public Works
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE GEOTECHNICAL AND LABORATORY
MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II, From South of
Overland Drive to Rancho California Road; (Project No. PW02-26)
City of Temecula, California
Converse Project No. 04-81-206-00
Dear Ms. Torre:
Enclosed is our proposal to provide Geotechnical and Laboratory Material Testing
Services for the above referenced project. In preparation of this proposal we reviewed
the request for proposal (RFP No. 128) issued by the City of Temecula dated May 11,
2004.
Converse Consultants (Converse) has the resources and experience to provide the City
of Temecula with quality services in a cost effective and timely manner. We have
extensive experience providing soils, materials testing and inspection services projects
in the Temecula area.
The team we have assembled to provide the required services has recent experience
working in Temecula for both the city and private developers. Dr. Hashmi Quazi will be
the principal -in -charge for this contract. He will be involved in contract negotiations,
technical oversight and assist the project manager with budget oversight and resource
allocation. Dr. Quazi will be available to discuss any issues of concern or mutual
interest.
10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, Califomia 92374
si ,� ..i, A«r '� • b v „ Telephorre',(909)>�T96-0`,r441- Facsimile: (909) 7964675V e-mail: ccieconvcyaol.com _ =
Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory
Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase 11
City of Temecula, California
May 21, 2004
Page ii
Mr. William Chu will be the designated Project Manager (PM). Mr. Chu was the PM for
a similar prior contract with the City of Temecula and has developed an excellent
relationship with City personnel. Mr. Chu will coordinate our scope of work with your
representatives. He will ascertain that all agreed upon tasks are delivered on time and
within budget. He will be involved in the day -today operation of this project. With his
experience working on the City of Temecula and other city projects, Mr. Chu will be a
very effective Project Manager.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to the City of Temecula,
Department of Public Works. Please feel free to call the undersigned or William Chu at
(909) 796-0544 if you have any questions or would like to discuss this proposal in
further detail.
CONVERSE CONSULTAN
Hashmi S. E. Quazi, Ph.D., G. E.
COB/Regional Manager
End: Schedules of Fees and General Conditions
Dist: 2/Addressee
v Converse Consultants
CCIENMOFFICEUOBFILE12004t81104-206\0420"_pro
._ e
Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory
Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II
City of Temecula, California
May 21, 2004
Page 1
1.0 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS CAPABILITIES
1.1 Introduction
Converse Consultants was founded in 1946 by Professor Frederick J. Converse in
Pasadena, California, to provide the construction industry with geotechnical engineering
and geological services. As a pioneer in modem soil mechanics, Professor Converse
developed many innovative techniques and products to deal with varied and complex
foundation engineering issues. Converse Consultants (Converse) has provided
professional consulting services on projects which have varied from rocket engine test
facilities to high rise buildings, steel mills to dry docks, tunnels, roadways, wastewater
treatment plants, water reservoir and dams, educational institutions, and residential,
commercial, and industrial developments.
As a measure of its achievements and successful operation during the past 55 years,
Converse is honored to have among its clients many of the nation's distinguished
architects, engineers, developers, contractors, as well as many private, public and
government agencies.
As a result of its technical excellence and client -oriented services, Converse has grown
substantially and has offices in Southern California (Monrovia, Redlands, Costa Mesa),
Nevada, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York. The organization has more than
250 professionals consisting of geotechnical engineers; civil and structural engineers,
engineering geologists, environmental scientists, deputy inspectors, laboratory and field
technicians, drafting/CAD specialists, and several other support personnel specialized
in their respective fields. Our Southern California offices have more than 40 licensed
and experienced technicians and deputy inspectors specialized in their respective fields
(including concrete, masonry, batch plant, fireproofing, shotcrete, soils, structural steel,
welding, and non destructive testing).
Our services include various disciplines of geotechnical engineering, applied geology
(hydro -and engineering geology), materials inspection, soil and rock testing/analyses,
materials testing, and environmental sciences and engineering:
1.2 Office Locations
All projects for the City of Temecula will be managed and staffed out of our Redlands
office. The lists of our offices are presented below.
9531
V Converse Consultants
CCIENT\OFFICEUOBFILEl2004\81 \04-206\04206-0_pro
Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory
Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II
City of Temecula, California
May 21, 2004
Page 2
Converse Consultants
10391 Corporate Drive
Redlands, CA 92374
(909)796-0544 ® Fax (909) 796-7675
e-mail: hquazi@converseconsultants.com
222 East Huntington Drive, Suite 211
Monrovia, California 91016-3500
(626) 930-1200 0 Fax (626) 930-1212
Fax (626) 930-1280 (Corporate)
e-mail: hquazi@converseconsultants.com
California
185 East Paularino Avenue, Suite B
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
(714)444-9660 a Fax (714) 444-9640
e-mail: hquazi@converseconsultants.com
Nevada
731 Pilot Road, Suite H 421 Court Street
Las Vegas, NV 89119 Elko, NV 89801
(702) 269-8336 A Fax (702) 269-8353 (702) 753-6266 a (702) 738-7955
e-mail: dchristainsen@converseconsultants.com e-mail: dalford@converseconsultants.com
4840 Mill Street, #4
Reno, NV 89502
702) 856-3833 0 Fax (702) 856-3513
e-mail: stanphill@converseconsultants.com
New Jersey
3 Century Drive
Parsippany, NJ 07054-0265
(201) 605-5200 a Fax (201) 605-8145
e-mail: ioweiss@converseconsultants.com
New York
Converse Consultants
2 Penn Plaza, Ste. 1500
New York, NY 10121
(212) 292-4867 0 Fax (212) 292-4979
e-mail: dchristainsen@converseconsultants.com
Pennsylvania
2738 West College Avenue
State College, PA 16803
(814) 234-3223 ® Fax (814) 234-3255
e-mail: bbrusse@converseconsultants.com
Converse Consultants
CCIENT\OFFICEUOBFILE\2004\81 \04-206\0420"_pro
Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory
Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II
City of Temecula, California
May 21, 2004
Page 18
4.0 SCOPE OF WORK
Our scope of work for this project will likely include the following tasks:
4.1 General
• Attendance at the pre -construction meeting by the project manager and the lead
soils technician.
• Review of project plans and specification with emphasis on geotechnical and
laboratory material testing services.
• Provide support staff for sample pick-up and delivery and to assist the project
manager in the office.
• Attendance (if requested) at weekly project progress meetings by the project
manager and the lead technician.
4.2 Geotechnical Monitoring Services
• Provide soils technicians to observe and test compacted fill and backfill and
approve all excavation bottoms. Field density testing will be conducted in
accordance per ASTM Standard D1556 (Sand Cone) or ASTM D2922-96
(Nuclear Gauge) test methods. We estimate that 20% of the field density testing
will be performed using the sand cone method.
• Observation and field testing services during all phases of site grading, including
but not limited to removal of unsuitable soils and approval of areas to receive fill.
• Field observation and testing during trench backfilling operations including
placement of recycled asphalt subbase, crushed aggregate base, asphalt
concrete and asphalt rubber hot mix.
• Field density testing during subgrade and base compaction.
• Field sampling and testing of base, asphalt concrete and asphalt rubber hot mix.
• All necessary laboratory tests to support field services.
• Preparation of field and final compaction reports, as required.
• Concrete sampling and testing.
• Consulting services requiring corrective and/or remedial recommendations, if
necessary.
921
IW Converse Consultants
CCIEN-ROFFICEUOBFILE\2004181 W4-206104206-0�_pro
Proposal to Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory
Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II
City of Temecula, California
May 21, 2004
Page 19
4.3 Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing will be conducted in conjunction with field observations and is likely
to include:
• Maximum density -optimum moisture content relationship (soils)
• Maximum density -optimum moisture content relationship (aggregate)
• Sieve analysis
• Sand equivalent
• Extraction and gradation test of asphalt concrete
4.4 Office Support
• Preparation of field and final compaction reports as required
• Consulting services requiring corrective and/or remedial recommendations, as
required
• At the end of each day work our field technician/inspector will prepare daily
reports. The reports will document the work that was performed under the
observation of our technician, the type of test performed, location of the test,
result of the test and remarks.
Converse Consultants
CCI E NT\OF FICE\JOBFILE\2004\81 \04-206\04206-O_pro
Converse Consultants
Over 50 Years of Dedication in Geotechnical Engineering and Environmental Sciences
C
MAY 2 8 2004
May 27, 2004
CITY OF TEMECULA
Ms. Mayra De LaTorre, P.E.
Associate Engineer — Capital Projects
Department of Public Works
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
Subject: COST ESTIMATE TO PROVIDE GEOTECHNICAL AND LABORATORY
MATERIAL TESTING SERVICES
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II, From South of
Overland Drive to Rancho California Road
(Project No. PW02-26)
City of Temecula, California
Converse Project No. 04-81-206-00
Dear Ms. Torre:
We are pleased to know that we have been selected to provide geotechnical and
laboratory materials testing services for the Jefferson Avenue Pavement
Rehabilitation — Phase II project in the city of Temecula, California.
As requested by you, we have included an estimated cost in the attached table.
Please feel free to call the undersigned at (909) 796-0544 with any questions or if you
would like to discuss our fee schedules in greater detail.
CONVERSE CONSULT
Hashmi S. Quazi, Ph.D., G.E.
COB/Regional Manager
Dist: 2/Addressee
w,n m
10391 Corporate Drive, Redlands, California 92374
a•c,cl•e Telephone: (909) 796-0544 ♦ Facsimile: (909) 796-7675 ♦ e-mail: ccieconv@aol com
0
Cost Estimate To Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II, From South of Overland Drive to Rancho
California Road
City of Temecula, California
May 27, 2004
Page 2
COST ESTIMATE
TASK
ESTIMATED HOURS BY STAFF DESIGNATION
PIC*
PM*
ST*
LT*
DIS*
SS*
Project Set-up
2
4
0
0
0
4
Observation and Testing of
Soil Compaction
(45 days @ 4hr/day)
0
0
180
0
0
0
Asphalt Sampling & Testing
0
0
20
0
0
0
Laboratory Testing of Soils &
Concrete & Asphalt
0
0
0
160t'I
0
0
Sample Pick-up
0
0
0
0
0
15
Project Management
8
20
0
0
16
16
TOTAL HOURS
10
24
200
160
16
31
HOURLY RATE
145
110
80
65
55
55
TOTAL
$1,450
$2,640
$16,000
$10,400
$880
$1,705
Our total cost estimate for the project will be $33,075.00.
* Explanation
PIC — Principal -in -Charge
PM — Project Manager
ST — Soil Technician
LT — Laboratory Technician
DIS — Dispatcher
SS — Support Staff
t'ITests are included
CONDITIONS
In general, our fees are based on the following assumptions:
♦ The hourly rates are based on an eight -hour day. Overtime will be charged 1.5 times
the actual prevailing wage rate.
♦ Minimum show up time will be two hours if scheduled services are canceled.
Converse Consultants
CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\2004\81\04-206\04206-0 cos
Cost Estimate To Provide Geotechnical and Laboratory Material Testing Services
Jefferson Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation — Phase II, From South of Overland Drive to Rancho
California Road
City of Temecula, California
May 27, 2004
Page 3
♦ We will assess a minimum four-hour charge for services less than four hours and eight
hours for services between four and eight hours.
♦ Additional inspections and laboratory testing outside an agreed -upon scope of work
can be provided upon request. Charges for these additional services will be assessed
based on our Schedules of Fees.
♦ For on call service the test locations will be prepared and ready for testing by Converse
field personnel upon their arrival at the site. The client and/or contractor will be
responsible for the excavation and backfilling of all test locations.
♦ No services will be provided prior to signature of an agreement with you. No additional
work required will be provided without written authorization and a budget amendment
from your authorized representative.
♦ Our services will be performed on a time -and -materials basis in accordance with the
unit rates indicated, and/or Schedules of Fees and General Conditions that are
included in the proposal.
♦ Our field representative will not direct, supervise or lay out the work of the contractor.
Our services will not include a review or evaluation of the contractor's safety measures
on or near the project.
♦ Testing services outlined in this proposal will be performed at the request of your
authorized representative. If services are provided on as -needed basis, no comments
regarding compaction procedures or observations will be made. Daily field reports
indicating work performed and test locations will be provided as the testing is
completed.
♦ We require 24 hours advance notice for scheduling of our services. We will, however,
make every attempt to accommodate requests for services with less notice.
Converse Consultants
CCIENT\OFFICE\JOBFILE\2004\81\04-206\04206-0 cos
EXHIBIT B
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
10
R:\CIP\ProjectsIPW02-26\Agreements\Converse Conslts Agreement
CONVERSE CONSULTANTS
Schedule of Fees
Materials Testing Services
Compensation for laboratory testing services will be based on rates in accordance with this schedule. Costs of tests not on this schedule will be
by quote and/or in accordance with our current hourly fee schedule. Our services will be performed in accordance with the General Conditions.
This fee schedule is valid through January 31, 2005,
AGGREGATES
Moisture Content (ASTM D2216).............................................
$10.00
Particle Size Analysis
• Coarse (ASTM C136), each...............................................60.00
• Coarse and fine (ASTM C136 & 137), each ....................
140.00
• Specific Gravity S Absorption
• Coarse Aggregate (ASTM C127).......................................80.00
• Fine Aggregate (ASTM C128)............................................80.00
• Unit weight per cubic foot (ASTM C29)..............................
50.00
• Soundness -Sodium or Magnesium (ASTM C88),each
... 200.00
• Potential Alkali Reactivity (ASTM D289)..........................300.00
• Freeze Thaw Soundness .................................................
175.00
• Los Angeles Abrasion, per Gass (ASTM C131, C535)
...210.00
• Sand Equivalent (ASTM D2419)........................................
70.00
• Lightweight Particles (ASTM C123), each .........................
75.00
• Clay Lumps and Friable Particles (ASTM C142), each
... 100.00
• Stripping test (ASTM D1664), each ...................................
65.00
• Organic impurities (ASTM C40).........................................
W.00
• Durability .......................................................................
By Quote
CONCRETE TESTS
Laboratory Trial Batch (ASTM C192).................................
By Quote
Laboratory Mix Design, historical data ...............................
By Quote
Compression Test, 6"x 12" cylinder (ASTM C39), each.,
........ 20.00
Light Weight Concrete
Compression......................................................................
20.00
UnitWeight.........................................................................
20.00
Specimen preparation, trimming or coring............................50.001hr
Bond Strength (ASTM C321)
• Prepared by Converse.....................................................120.00
• Prepared by Others ............................................................
60.00
Core Compression Test (ASTM C12), each ..............................
45.00
.Flexure test, 6"x 6' beams (ASTM C78), each ..........................60.00
Modulus of Elasticity - Static (ASTM C469), each... ................
110.00
Length Change (3 bars, 5 readings each,
- up to 26 days) (ASTM C157)...........................................
250.00
Splitting Tensile, 6" x 12" cylinders, each ..................................
50.00
Field Concrete Control (sampling, slump, temperature,
cast 4 cylinders, molds, cylinder pick-up, within
10 mi. of office, stand-by extra)
ASTM/UBC, hourly rate schedule, or each Cylinder.........
70.00
Field Concrete Control (same as above plus
air content test) ASTM/UBC, hourly rate
schedule, or each Cylinder.. ........ .... ...........................
80.00
HoldCylinder................................................................................
7.00
Cylinder Mold sent to job site but not coated by Converse or
returned to Converse.. ...................................... ...........................
5.00
MASONRY (ASTM C140, E447, UBC STANDARD 24-22)
Moisture Content, as received, each ....................... ..................
20,00
Absorption, each........................................................................
50.00
Compression, each....................................................................
40.00
Shrinkage (ASTM C426), each... ...............................................90.00
Net Area and Volume, each.......................................................25.00
Masonry Blocks, per set of 9....................................................
650.00
Compression Test, grouted prisms,
8" x 8" x 16". each.............................................................
110.00
;ompression Test, grouted prisms,
12" x 16' x 16". each .........................................................
140.00
Compression Test
• 2" x 4" Mortar Cylinder, each...............................................20.00
• 3" x 6" Grout Prisms, each..................................................20.00
• 2" Cubes (ASTM C109), each............................................20.00
Castby others.............................................................................20.00
Mortar or Grout Mix Designs.................................................By Quote
FIREPROOFING TESTS
Oven Dry Density (per sample)..................................................45.00
ASPHALTIC CONCRETE
Stability, Flow, and Unit Weight,
Marshall ASTM D1559, ASTM D2726, set of
3 Specimens/samples......................................................150.00
Measured Maximum Specific Gravity of Mix (ASTM D2041)
(Ricos Method), each........................................................75.00
Void Analysis of Cores or Marshall Specimens
Calculations Only (ASTM D3203) set of 2 or 3 ................35.00
Laboratory Mixing of Asphalt 8 Concrete, per sample. ..............
50.00
Extraction of Asphalt and Gradation, each...............................120.00
Complete Asphalt Concrete Mix Design
(Hveem or Marshall)....................................................By
Quote
Extraction, % Asphalt (ASTM D2172, Method B) or
California 310, including ash correction, each ...............135.00
Specific Gravity (ASTM D2726 or ASTM D1188)
• uncoated..............................................................................50.00
• coated..................................................................................70.00
Immersion-Compression...........................................................400.00
Particle waling (ASTM 2489).....................................................30.00
Stripping (ASTM D1664).............................................................50.00
Moisture or Volatile Distillates in paving mixtures,
or materials containing petroleum products or
byproducts.......................................................................120.00
Retained Strength (ASTM D10741D1075)
6 specimens................................................................By
Quote
Retained Stability, Mil, Std, 520A, Method 104,
6 specimens................................................................By
Quote
CBR, ASTM D1883, including M/D curve, 1 point ...................210.00
Asphalt Temperature ..................................................................
15.00
STRUCTURALSTEEL
Tensile Test, #11 Bar or Smaller, each......................................45.00
Bend Test, #11 Bar or Smaller, each.........................................35.00
Tensile Test, #14 Bar, each......................................................115.00
Tensile Test, #18 Bar, each......................................................310.00
Rebar coupler tensile test...........................................................60.00
Tensile Test, Welded #11 Bar or Smaller, each ........................50.00
Tensile Test, Welded #14 Bar, each ........................................
110.00
Tensile Test, Welded #18 Bar, each........................................300.00
Tensile Test, Mechanically Spliced Bar, #11 Bar or Smaller,
each...........................................................................................150.00
Tensile Test, Mechanically Spliced Bar, #14 Bar, each ..... ......
310.00
HIGH STRENGTH BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER TESTING
Wedge Tensile Test for A490 Bolts
Under 100,000 Ibs, each........................................................45.00
Over 100,000 Ibs, each..........................................................55.00
Wedge Tensile Test for A325 Bolts
Under 100,000 Ibs, each. ... .............. .......... - ........ ...... 50.00
(verse.Consultans M2004mPage 1 of 2 (See Reverse)
HIGH STRENGTH BOLT, NUT, AND WASHER TESTING,
continued
Tensile Test - Anchor Bolts, tested with displacement
transducers, each.....................................................................
300.00
Nut - Hardness, Proof, and Cone Proof Load Test, each .........
50.00
Washer - Hardness, each..........................................................
30.00
A325 or A490 - Bolt hardness only, each .................................
35.00
Bolt A325 or A490
Wedge Tensile Under 100,000 Ibs, and Hardness, each ....
80.00
Wedge Tensile Over 100,000lbs, and Hardness, each ....100.00
Boll, Nut, and Washer - All Tests per set with bolts
Under100,000lbs...............................................................250.00
Over100,000 Ibs.................................................................
350.00
NOTES:
(1) See Geotechnical-Laboratory Testing Schedule of Fees for
soil testing.
(2) Hourly rates are available upon request.
(3) Field laboratory rates are available upon request.
(4) Listed unit rates are based upon the assumption that samples
will be delivered to our laboratory at no cost to Converse.
Converse Consultants,MTS2004 - - - Page 2 of 2
CONVERSE CONSULTANTS
Schedule of Fees
Geotechnical Laboratory Testing
:ompensalion for laboratory testing services will be made in accordance with this fee schedule. Costs of tests not on this schedule
will be by quote and/or in accordance with our current hourly fee schedule. The rates are based on non -contaminated soil. A
surcharge will be charged for handling contaminated material, which will be determined based on the project.
IDENTIFICATION AND INDEX PROPERTIES TESTS
Visual Classification, ASTM D2488.....................................8.00
Engineering Classification, ASTM D2487 .........................15.00
Moisture Content
• Moisture Content & Dry (Bulk) Density,
ASTM D2216 & D2937.............................................15.00
• Moisture Content, ASTM D2216................................10.00
Shrinkage Limit, ASTM D427............................................85.00
Atterberg Limits, ASTM D4318
• Several points............................................................75.00
• One point...................................................................40.00
Particle Size Analysis, ASTM D422
• Fine Sieve (From +#200 to 94)..................................80.00
• Coarse Sieve (From +#200 to 3 in)............................80.00
• Hydrometer................................................................85.()0
Percent Passing #200 Sieve, ASTM Of 140......................45.00
Specific Gravity
• Fine (passing #4 sieve), ASTM D854 ........................70.00
• Coarse (retained on #4 sieve), ASTM C127..............70.00
Sand Equivalent Test ........................................................
75.00
Double Hydrometer Dispersion, ASTM D4221................150.00
COMPACTION AND BEARING STRENGTH
Standard Proctor Compaction, ASTM D698 or ASTM D1557-
91
• Method A or B... ..................... ..... .... .........................
120-00
Method C (6-inch mold)...........................................140.00
California Impact Method (Caitrans 216) ........................180.00
R-value, ASTM D2844....................................................220.00
California Bearing Ratio (CBR), ASTM D1883
• 1 point......................................................................125.00
• 3 point......................................................................325.()0
Relative Density
• 0.1 cubic foot mold...................................................200.00
• 0.5 cubic foot mold: ..................................................
300.00
SHEAR STRENGTH
Torvane/Pocket Penetrometer..........................................20.00
Direct Shear (per point)
• Quick Test..................................................................60.00
• Consolidated - Drained (granular soil)
ASTMD3080..........................................................140.00
• Consolidated - Drained (fine grained soil),
ASTMD3080..........................................................200.00
• Consolidated - Undrained (fine grained)..................120.00
• Residual Strength, per Cycle.....................................45.00
• Remolded Specimens, per specimen ........................45.00
STATIC UNIAXIAL AND TRIAXIAL STRENGTH TESTS
(PER POINT)
Unconfined Compression, ASTM 2166.............................75.00
Unconsolidated - Undrained, ASTM D2850....................110.00
Consolidated — Undrained (per point).............................700.00
Consolidated — Drained (per point).................................700.00
With Pore Pressure Measurement, per load...................150.00
Remolded Specimens, per specimen...............................45.00
CONSOLIDATION AND SWELL COLLAPSE TESTS
8 Load Increments..........................................................180.00
Additional load increment .................................................
30.00
Time -Ratio, per load increment........................................60.00
Single Point (collapse lest) ...............................................
60.00
Single Load Swell, ASTM D4546
• Ring Sample, Field Moisture......................................65.00
• Ring Sample, Air Dried..............................................65.00
Remolded Sample, per specimen.....................................45.00
Expansion Index Test, UBC 29-2/ASTM D4829 ...............
80.00
HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY TESTS
Constant Head, ASTM D2434........................................
250.00
Falling Head Flexible Wall, ASTM D5084.......................
300.00
Triaxial Permeability, EPA 9100.....................................
350.00
Remolded Specimen, per specimen .................................
50.00
CHEMICAL TESTS
Corrosivity (pH, resistivity, sulfates, chlorides) ...............140.00
Organic Content, ASTM D2974........................................ 65.00
Conditions: Unit rates presented on this fee schedule are for routinely performed
geotechnivai laboratory tests. Numerous other earth material physical tests can
be performed in our geotechnical laboratories, including rock core, soil cement
and soil lime mixture tests. Tests not listed can be quoted upon request. This fee
schedule is valid through January 31, 2005.
Prices are based on the assumption dal samples are uncontaminated and do not
contain heavy metals, acids, carcinogens and/or volatile organics which can be
measured by an organic vapor awlyzer or pholoionization detector with a
concentration greater than 50 pads -per -million (ppm). Quoted testing lees are
based on the assumption that no protective clothing will be required to handle
samples. If Level D protective clothing will be required during handling of samples
as defined in the Federal CFR Part 1910.120), then a 4D% increase in fees
presented in this schedule will be appied. Level C protective clothing will be a
60% increase inees. nverse will not handle samples that require either Level
8 or Level A protection in Our geotechnical laboratories. Contaminated samples
will be returned to the client. Uncontaminated samples will be disposed of 30 days
after presentation of test results. The client must disclose the source of samples.
Samples imported from out or state will be incinerated after testing, in accordance
with requirements of the United States Department of Agriculture. Soil samples
obtained within the State of California currently designated quarantine areas will
also be incinerated in accordance with the requirement of the State of California,
Department of Food and Agriculture, Division of Plant Industry, Pest Exclusion. A
$5.00 incineration fee will be added to each sample that is required to be
incinerated in accordance with State and Federal taw.
Test results requiring plots will be presented in a publishable formal generated
from computer programs. Otherwise, raw test numbers will be presented. A
minimum laboratory fee of $50.00 will be charged to present and mail test results.
Beyond the standard U. S. Mail delivery, specialized transmittal will be charged at
additional cost (e.g., Federal Express, UPS, etc.). Geotechnical testing does not
include engineering andlor geologic review and analysis. Typical turn -around for
geotechnical laboratory testing is two weeks (or roughly ten working days). To
expedite lest turn.around to five working days, a 50% increase in the fees in this
schedule will be applied. Many geotechnical tests require at least one week to
perform in accordance with the ASTM or other standard specification. Fees
presented in this schedule for relatively undisturbed direct shear, consolidation or
expansion pressure tests are based on the assumption that 22-inch-diameter
(2.416-inch inside diameter) brass ring samples will be provided to the
geotechnical laboratory for testing. Remolded specimens will be compacted in
standard 2.5-Inch outside diameter brass rings for direct shear, consolidation and
expansion pressure tests. All fees presented in this schedule are based on the
assumption that the client will deliver samples to our laboratory at no additional
cost to Converse. Sample pick-up is available at a rate of $45 per hour of drive
time and $0.50 per mile driven.
Invoices will be issued monthly and are payable on receipt unless otherwise
agreed upon. Interest of 1.5% per month (but not exceeding the maximum
allowed by law) will be payable on any amount not paid within thirty days; payment
thereafter to be applied first to accrued interest and then to the principle unpaid
amount. The Client shall pay any attorneys' fees or other costs incurred in
collecting any delinquent amounts.
Converse Consultants GLT2004
CONVERSE CONSULTANTS
Prevailing Wage Schedule of Fees
Personnel
Introduction
It is the objective of Converse Consultants to provide its clients with quality professional and technical services and a continuing source of
professional advice and opinions. Services will be performed in a manner consistent with that level of pre and skill ordinarily exercised by
members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar condifions. This fee schedule is valid through January3l, 2005.
Hourly Charges for Personnel
Staff assignments will depend on personnel availability, job complexity, project site location and experience level required to, satisfy the technical
requirements of the project and to meet the prevailing standard of professional pre.
Field Technical Services
Construction Inspector - IC80 and/or AW S/CWI certified (concrete, masonry, structural steel, fireproofing.
Includes concrete batch plant and local steel fabrication inspections) $60
DSA Masonry Inspector 65
Non-DesWctive Testing Inspector (ultrasonic, magnetic particle, dye penetrant pull testing, torque testing.
Schmidt hammer, and pachometer) 75
Sills Technician 80
Supervisory Solis Technician 90
Professional Services (Field and Office)
Staff Professional $70
Senior Staff Professional 80
Project Professional 100
Project Manager 110
Senior Professional 125
Principal Professional 145
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory Technician $65
(Unit prices for routine tests quoted upon request see Geotechnical Laboratory Testing and Materials Testing Services
Schedules of Fees)
Office Support
Cledaal/Word Processing $55
Drafting 60
CAD Operator/Drafting Manager 70
Overtime and special shift rates for Field Technical Services personnel are delemdned in accordance with Prevailing Wage law. An overtime
charge of 50 percent of the above houdyrates for LaboratoryTesting and Office Support personnel will be added for time In excess ofeight fours
per day at time job site and for all time on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays. Travel time to and from thejob site will be charged at the hourly rates
for the appWriate personnel.
Expenses
1. Exploration expenses (drilling, trenching, etc.) are charged at cost plus fifteen percent.
2. Travel and subsistence expenses (transportation, room and board, eta) for Individuals on projects requiring travel and/or living away
from a principal office are charged at cost plus fifteen percent
3. Automobile and truck expenses are charged at cost plus fifteen percent (rentals) or at a rate of fifty cents per mile for company -owned
vehicles traveling between principal office and project
4. Other out-of-pocket direct project expenses (aerial photos, long-distance telephone calls, permits, bands, outside printing services, tests,
etc.) are charged at cost plus fifteen percent
Invoices
1. Invoices will be submitted to the Client on a monthly basis, and a final bill will be submitted upon completion of services.
2. Payment is due upon presentation of Invoice and is past -due thirty days from Invoice date. In time event Client fails to make anypayment
to Converse when due, Converse may Immediately cease work hereunder until said payment, togetherwith a service charge at time rate
of eighteen percent per annum (but not exceeding the maximum allowed by law) from the due date, has been received. Further,
Converse may at its sole option and discretion refuse to perform any further work irrespective of payment from Client in the event Client
falls to pay Converse for services when said payments are due.
3. Client shall pay aftomeys' fees or other costs incurred in collecting any delinquent amount.
General Conditions
The temps and provisions of the Converse General Conditions are incorporated Into this fee schedule as though set forth in full. if a copy of the
General Conditions does not accompany this fee schedule, Client should request a copy from this office.
Converse Consultants PW2004
ITEM 15
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF Fit
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Grant Yates, Assistant to the City Manager
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Opposition of Assembly Bill 2162 (Oropeza) relating to Indian Gaming
PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Sr. Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the following resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 2162 (OROPEZA)
WHICH PROPOSES TO ADD SPECIAL DISTRICTS TO THE
SIXTY -PERCENT NEXUS GRANT CATEGORY ESTABLISHED IN
SENATE BILL 621.
BACKGROUND: Senate Bill 621 (Chapter 858, Statutes of 2003) established the methodology for
calculating the distribution of appropriations for the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund (SDF) to local
jurisdictions impacted by tribal gaming. The methodology recognizes that the most significant impacts are
borne by the county and cities and earmarks sixty -percent of each Individual Tribal Casino Account (ITCA)
to be allocated to the county and cities based on a four-part nexus test.
Each ITCA is to be allocated as follows: 60% for nexus grants to the county and cities (local government
jurisdictions) based on a four-part nexus test; 20% for discretionary grants to local jurisdictions (county,
cities, and special districts) impacted by Indian gaming paying into the SDF; and 20% discretionary grants
to local jurisdictions (counties, cities, and special districts) impacted by a gaming tribe not paying into the
SDF.
Assembly Bill 2162 proposes to add special districts to the sixty -percent nexus grant category thereby
diluting the amount of funds to the county and cities to mitigate impacts from tribal gaming. Riverside
County has approximately 68 special districts that would be "entitled" to a portion of the sixty -percent
nexus grant if Assembly Bill 2162 is approved.
Contrary to the author's office that states the bill is intended as clean up legislation and to make
references to local jurisdictions in the bill consistent, the proposed changes will have a significant impact
on the county and cities. Riverside County has 68 special districts including library, park and recreation,
water, pest and vector control, cemetery, health care, resource conservation, fire, irrigation, and sanitary
districts. These districts would be entitled to a portion of the sixty -percent if their jurisdiction is located
within a 4-mile radius of a tribal casino and partially borders the land on which the tribal casino is located.
In addition, on May, 25, 2004, the County of Riverside passed a resolution of opposition regarding
Assembly Bill 2162.
FISCAL IMPACT: This proposed legislation will reduce the amount of funding to the county and
cities from nexus grants to mitigate the impacts of tribal gaming.
Attachment: Resolution 04-
RESOLUTION NO. 04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA OPPOSING ASSEMBLY BILL 2162
(OROPEZA) WHICH PROPOSES TO ADD SPECIAL
DISTRICTS TO THE SIXTY -PERCENT NEXUS GRANT
CATEGORY ESTABLISHED IN SENATE BILL 621
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER
AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, Senate Bill 621 established the methodologyfor calculating the distribution of
appropriations for the Indian Gaming Special Distribution Fund; and
WHEREAS, this methodology recognizes the most significant impacts from tribal gaming are
borne by the county and cities thus making them eligible for the sixty -percent nexus grant; and
WHEREAS, it has also been calculated in SB 621 that counties, cities, and special districts
impacted by a gaming tribe not paying into the Special Distribution Fund are eligible for a twenty -
percent discretionary grant and counties, cities, and special districts that are impacted by a gaming
tribe that does pay into the Special Distribution Fund are eligible for a twenty -percent discretionary
grant; and
WHEREAS, AB 2162 proposes to add special districts to the sixty -percent nexus grant
category thereby diluting the amount of funds to counties and cities to mitigate impacts from tribal
gaming; and
WHEREAS, Riverside County has sixty eight special districts including library, park and
recreation, water, pest and vector control, cemetery, healthcare, resource conservation, fire,
irrigation, and sanitary districts; and
WHEREAS, these sixty eight districts would be entitled to a portion of the sixty -percent if
theirjurisdiction is located within a four mile radius of a tribal casino and partially borders the land on
which the tribal casino is located; and
WHEREAS, AB 2162 will reduce the amount of funding to the county and cities from nexus
grants to mitigate the impacts of tribal gaming; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City of Temecula hereby opposes the
passage of Assembly Bill 2162 (Oropeza) by the Legislature, and directs the City Council to notify
Assemblywoman Oropeza, the Governor, Assemblyman Haynes and Senator Hollingsworth of its
opposition.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 8th day of June, 2004.
Resos\99-88 1
Mike Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 04-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
Resos\99-88
ITEM 16
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FII
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Howard Windsor, Fire Chief 'j �Lk/
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Purchase of Defibrillators and Paramedic Medical Supplies
PREPARED BY: Greg Adams, Fire Captain
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Authorize the City Manager to purchase an additional $8,000 of Paramedic supplies from
Life Assist in Fiscal Year 2003-04.
2. Authorize the expenditure to purchase four defibrillators for a total cost of $88,000.00 from
Zoll in Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
Authorize the expenditure to purchase general Paramedic medical supplies from Life
Assist for an annual amount of $38,500 in Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
DISCUSSION: In an effort to enhance paramedic service within the City of Temecula, we
are proposing to add paramedics to fire engines assigned to the City. Approximately 80% of all
emergency calls in Temecula are responses to medical calls and traffic accidents. With the
increase in population, as well as the forthcoming annexation of Redhawk, we must look for ways
to help keep our response times below the City's 5-minute expectation and deliver Advanced Life
Support (ALS) on scene as soon as possible. To accomplish this 5-minute response expectation
paramedics are being added to Engines 92 and 12 in July 2004. By adding paramedics to the fire
engines this will reduce the response times of AILS for these locations, which are currently
covered by the Medic Squads from stations 84 and 73. Taking into account the order ship time of
the ALS equipment and operational supplies, it is necessary to initiate these purchases in
advance of July 2004.
Two vendors are primarily used for this support, Life Assist and Zoll. Life Assist is the current
supplier for medications and medical supplies and in Fiscal Year 2003-04 the City has spent
$23,331 with Life Assist. In order to bring fire engines 92 and 12 on line by July 1, 2004 these
purchases are needed. It is anticipated that the City Manger's $25,000 purchasing limit will be
exceeded in Fiscal Year 2004-05; therefore it is necessary to authorize the purchases at the
recommended levels to insure sufficient emergency supplies are available.
Zoll is the manufacturer of the cardiac Monitor we are currently using in both Temecula and
Riverside County Fire Departments. To support the paramedic services on the fire engines it is
also necessary to purchase two monitor/defibrillators in July and anticipate the purchase of two
additional monitors in late Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The cost of the monitor defibrillators and
associated supplies is approximately $20,000.00 per unit with accessories. The following is the
item pricing less tax and shipping/handling for the defibrillators and accessory supply items:
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient funds exist in the current Fiscal Year 2003-04 operating budget
and in the proposed Fiscal Year 2004-05 operating budget.
ITEM 17
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN CE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council/City Manager
FROM: Gary Thornhill, Deputy City Manager
DATE: June 8, 2003
SUBJECT: Fifth Amendment to the Contract to Update the City General Plan
Prepared by: David Hogan, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Contract Amendment No. 5 in the
amount of $23,026 and authorize the City Manager to sign the
amendment to the contract with Cotton Bridges Associates.
BACKGROUND: The City Council initially approved the contract for the General Plan Update in
2001. The current contract amount is $380,285. The original scope of work for the project
anticipated that the County would have completed its Circulation Plan and traffic modeling so that
the City could use the information as the foundation for its own efforts. However, the constant
changes in the County Plan have upset the original schedule and their most recent changes have
resulted in a need to re -run the traffic model to provide an accurate traffic analysis for the
environmental impact report.
In addition to the changes in the County Plan, these delays have also resulted in increased costs for
the Consultant and the need to update the previously completed biologic assessment. The
amendment proposes to use 2004 costs for the remaining work to be completed underthis contract.
Because of the initial project schedule, the contract had originally been based upon 2001 costs. It
is important to note that these cumulative project delays have not been caused by the Consultant's
job performance. Instead, the delays have originated from external sources beyond staff's and the
consultant's control. As a result, staff feels that the proposed amendment to the contract is justified
and reasonable. The total additional cost to complete the General Plan is $23,026.
Approval of this amendment will enable staff to keep the General Plan update moving forward on its
current schedule. The current schedule anticipates that public hearings will begin in November,
2004. This amendment will also extend the term of the contract to reflect the time needed for the
public hearings and the preparation of the final General Plan documents.
FISCAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds within the Planning Department's budget to fund this
amendment. Following Council approval, appropriate budget transfers will be completed using the
remaining funds.
Attachments:
Proposed Contract Amendment
R:\Gcmnl Plan\Conk Plan Update\Conaact\CBA Contract Fifth Amendment CC.doc
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
PROPOSED CONTRACT AMENDMENT
R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Contract\CBA Contract Rhh Amendment CC.doc
FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND
COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATES TO
UPDATE CITY GENERAL PLAN
THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of June 8, 2004 by and between
the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and "Cotton Bridges Associates"
("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On March 6, 2001 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement
entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for "Update City General Plan" ("Agreement")
in the amount of $340,285.00.
B. On October 1, 2001 the contract was amended to revise the scope of work of the
original contract with no additional costs.
C. On June 30, 2002 the contract was amended to extend the term of the agreement to
June 30, 2003.
D. On February 11, 2003 the contract was amended to extend the term of the agreement
to June 30, 2004.
E. On February 11, 2003 the contract was further amended to modify the scope and
increase the payment for services in the amount of $38,000.
F. The parties now desire to increase the payment for services in the amount of
$23,026.00 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
2. Section 1 Term of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows
The Agreement shall commence on March 26, 2001 and shall remain and continue in
effect until tasks herein described are completed, but in no event later than May 31,
2005, unless sooner terminated or extended pursuant to the provisions of this
Agreement.
3. Section 4 Payment of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and
schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B for services described in Section B of
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set
forth in full. The Fifth Amendment amount shall not exceed Twenty Three
Thousand Twenty -Six Dollars and No Cents ($23,026.00) for the completion of
the general plan update for a total contract amount, of Four Hundred Three
Thousand Three Hundred Eleven Dollars and No Cents ($403,311.00).
R:\Geneml Plan\Comp Plan Update\Con"Ct\CBA Contract Fifth Amendment CCAM
4. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on
Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as
though set forth in full.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed
the day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Shawn Nelson, City Manager
ATTEST:
Ii
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
M3
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT:
Cotton Bridges Associates
Attn: John Bridges
747 East Green Street #300
Pasadena, CA 91101-2119
I
003114
TITLE:
Ml
RdGeneral Plan\Comp Plan Update\COntract\CBA Contract Fifth Amendment CCAW
NAME:
TITLE:
(Two Signatures Required For Corporations)
RAGeneml Plan\ConW Plan Update\Contr a\CBA Contract Hfth Amendment CC.doc
ATTACHMENT A
Attached hereto and incorporated herein is the revised cost associated with each task to be
provided to the Consultant.
Cotton Bridges Associates
Task 1- Background Analysis $62,500
Task 5 — Issues Identification $98,650
Task 6 — Program EIR $44,800
Task 7 - Public Hearings $3,230
Task 8 — Final Plan and Map $11,065
Task 9- Project Management $13,276
Merkel and Associates (Sub -agreement with Cotton Bridges Associates)
Sub Agreement Amount $19,507
Austin -Foust (Sub -agreement with Cotton Bridges Associates)
Task 3 - Traffic Forecast $5,000
Task 4 - Special Issues $7,000
Task 5 — Highway Plan Preparation $14,500
RAGeneral Plan\Comp Plan Updaa,\Contract\CBA Conuact Fifth An ndnxnt CCAnc
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
MAY 25, 2004
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:36
P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts,
Washington
ABSENT: 1 DIRECTORS: Stone
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 2004.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the nine months ended March 31,
2004.
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Items No. 1 — 2. The motion
was second by Director Comerchero and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Director Stone who was absent.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
3 S.M.A.R.T. Prooram Presentation
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file report and PowerPoint presentation regarding the "Summer
Months Activities and Recreation in Temecula" (S.M.A.R.T.) program.
Community Services Director Parker introduced Recreation Superintendent Crowe -Pelletier and
Recreation Coordinator Walker who provided a detailed overview of the Summer Months and
Minutes.csd1052504
Recreation in Temecula (S.M.A.R.T.) Program, noting that this year this program will be
provided at seven City park sites.
President Washington commended staff on a job well done.
There being no objection, this report was received and filed.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
No additional comments.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
No additional comments.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
No comment.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No comment.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:40 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, June 8, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CIVIC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
Minutes.esd\052504
ITEM 2
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors /��
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Servic((�C
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Approve HVAC Preventative Maintenance Service
Contract For All City Facilities
PREPARED BY: Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
1. Award a twelve (12) month contract to Southcoast Heating and Air Conditioning Service for a
total amount of $65,000.00, effective July 1, 2004.
BACKGROUND: The Temecula Finance Department in cooperation with the Temecula
Community Services Department (TCSD) released a Request for Proposal (RFP) for HVAC
Preventative Maintenance on April 9, 2004. The TCSD received five (5) proposals, which were
evaluated to determine qualifications and to assess the competitiveness of their pricing. Southcoast
Heating and Air Conditioning was determined to be the lowest qualified bidder for the required
services. The three lowest bids were as follows:
ANNUAL PREVENTATIVE HOURLY RATE FOR
COMPANY MAINTENACE PRICE SUPPLEMENTAL SERVICES
Southcoast Heating $10,940.00 $70.00
A.O. Reed & Co. $12,703.00 $72.00
Jackson & Blanc $15,997.00 $75.00
The one year contract will provide $10,940.00 for preventative maintenance of HVAC equipment at
ten City buildings, including two fire stations. Equipment maintained includes kitchen hoods and
restroom vent fans, kitchen make-up air, heat pumps, heaters and air conditioners. This contract
provides $54,060.00 for additional supplemental services, such as, repair, replacement or the
installation of additional equipment.
RAWedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP Senda Repon Smffi o st Service Contact 04-05.dm
FISCAL IMPACT: The amount of the contract for FY 2004-05 is $65,000.00. Sufficient funds
have been included in the TCSD Budgets for FY 2004-05 in accounts:
190-180
190-181
190-182
190-184
190-185
190-188
340-701
340-702
001-171
Attachments: 1) Agreement
RAWedekib\RFPSt2004 RFPst2004 HVAC RFPtAgenda Report Smthcoast Service Contract 04-05.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA, COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT, made and entered into as of
June 8, 2004 by and between the City of Temecula, Community Services District (the District)
and Southcoast Heating and Air Conditioning ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual
covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM, This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2004 and shall
remain and continue in effect until June 30,2005 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement. The District reserves the option to extend the Agreement under
the same terms and conditions for three (3) additional one-year terms per the attached pricing
schedule in Exhibit B.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the
Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work") and shall
provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all
utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed
and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications
set forth in the Scope of Work.
3. PAYMENT. The District agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance
with the payment rates and schedules and terms as set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Sixty Five Thousand dollars ($65,000.00) for
the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment or change order is approved as
provided in this Agreement.
a. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed
detailing the work performed in a form acceptable to the Director of Finance. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the
previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to
all nondisputed fees. If the District disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice
to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
4. CHANGE ORDERS. The District Manager may approve additional work
provided such work does not exceed the sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00).
Change orders exceeding these limits shall be approved by the District.
5. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein.
Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by
persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in
meeting its obligations under this Agreement.
RAWedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP\Southcmt Agreement 2004.doc
6. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall
be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the District or its
authorized representatives.
7. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under
Paragraph 3., above, Contractor shall submit to the District, in writing, all claims for
compensation under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final
payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the District under or arising out of this
Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall
be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for
payment.
8. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the District has obtained the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk or may
be accessed on the State of California website: www.dir.ca.gov/DLSR/statistics. Copies may
be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of
such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum.
Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6,
and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Contractor shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day,
or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the
stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any
subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract.
9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT
CAUSE.
a. The District may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause,
suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at
least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall
immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the
District suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination
shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
District shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of
termination, provided that the work performed is of value to The District. Upon termination
of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to The
District pursuant to Section 3.
10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this
Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under
R:\WedekibTYPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP\Southcoa t Agreement 2004.doc
the terms of this Agreement, The District shall have no obligation or duty to continue
compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate
this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the
Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes
beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not
be considered a default.
b. If The District Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is
in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall
serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days
after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory
performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of
time, the District shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement,
to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy
to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the District, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and
against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind
or nature which the District, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which
may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising
out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform
under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of
the District.
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the
duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scone of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
RAWedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 RVAC RFMoutheowt Agreement 2004.do
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
and property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury
or disease.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise
acceptable to The District.
d. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the District with
original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The
endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to
bind coverage on its behalf. All endorsements are to be received and
approved by the District before work commences.
e. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires
every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or
undertake self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I
will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the
work of this Contract."
13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times
remain as to the District a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the
services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's
exclusive direction and control. Neither the District nor any of its officers, employees or
agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers,
employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or
in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner
officers, employees or agents of the District. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to
incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against the District, or bind City in any
manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the
Agreement, the District shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for
performing services hereunder for the District. The District shall not be liable for
compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing
services hereunder.
15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of
RAWedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP\Southcoast Agreement 2004.doc
State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in
any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor
shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The District, and its
officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the
Contractor to comply with this section.
16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of
ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that
may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to
make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on
initial investigations or reports prepared by the District for purposes of letting this Contract
out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the
Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be
accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of
time.
17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work
contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the District's Manager his affidavit
stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all
subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding
against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in
an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been
filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the
District, City, or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the
contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore,
the contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or
employee of the District, or City has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than
the District, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a
full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party
or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4
(commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4
of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each parry
is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon
each parry's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
20. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such
part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the District.
R:\Wedekib\RrPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP\Southcoast Agreement 2004.doc
21. UTILITY LOCATION. The District acknowledges its responsibilities with
respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
22. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the
appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
23. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it
will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex, age, or handicap.
24. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to
the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i)
personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not
limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii)
mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested,
addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party
may later designate by Notice:
To District: City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor: Southcoast Heating and Air Conditioning
2664 Vista Pacific Drive
Oceanside, CA 92056
25. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of
this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written
consent of the District.
26. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement,
Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the
performance of the services described in this Agreement.
27. GOVERNING LAW. The District and Contractor understand and
agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and
liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement.
Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal
district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire
understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this
Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and
statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or
effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set
forth herein and upon each parry's own independent investigation of any and all facts such
RAWedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 HVAC RFP\Southcrost Agreement 2004.doc
party deems material.
29. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or
persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or
she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the
authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
R:\Wedekib\RFPS\2004 RFPs\2004 RVAC RFP\Southcoast Agreement 2004.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT,
CITY OF TEMECULA
1')'d
Chuck Washington, President
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Name
By:
Name:
Title:
(Two Signatures Required for Corporations)
EXHIBIT "A-1"
CITY OF TEMECULA
HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE DUTIES
FOR CITY OF TEMECULA
SPECIFICATIONS/SCOPE OF WORK
1. Preventative maintenance duties described in this Scope of Work are to be performed on
the HVAC equipment and vent fans at the following ten locations in Temecula:
• City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive
• Maintenance Facility, 43210 Business Park Drive
• Community Recreation Center, 30875 Rancho Vista Road
• Temecula Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street
• Mary Phillips Senior Center, 41845 6'h Street
• Temecula Valley Museum, 28314 Mercedes Street
• Chapel of Memories, 28300 Mercedes Street
Temecula Children's Museum, 42081 Main Street
• Fire Station 84, 30650 Pauba Road
Fire Station 92, 32364 Overland Trail
2. The items in this scope of work are to be completed four times a year at each location,
unless noted otherwise. The tentative schedule is for this to be completed in July, October,
January and April each year during the term of the contract.
3. Preventative maintenance duties to be performed at each location, four times a year are as
follows:
• Test and observe heating/cooling operation all equipment.
• Furnish and replace all air filters to manufacturer's specification.
• Note size and quantity of each filter for each HVAC unit.
• Check for correct amperage draw out/unit components.
• Check refrigerant system for leaks/proper charge.
• Check and clean condensate pans, drains and drain lines.
• Check all electrical contacts/relays for wear/lube as needed.
• Clean equipment of excessive grease and oil.
• Secure all panels, covers, guards, etc.
• Inspect drive belts for tension, wear, and alignment.
• Inspect/adjust equipment operation and safety controls.
• Inspect/adjust furnace burners, ignition equipment, heat exchangers and gas valves.
• Inspect fan blades/blowers wheels for balance, condition and cracks.
• Check shaft/bearings condition and lubricate as required.
• Check all electrical connectors for condition/tightness.
• Clean evaporator and condenser coils.
• Brush/clean all return air grills.
• Observe air distribution devices for restrictions and adjust as needed.
• Check thermostat/time clock system settings and operation. Adjust as directed by
Maintenance Supervisor.
• Notify Maintenance Supervisor of any needed repairs.
4. Once a year at City Hall, during July's preventative maintenance period, use high-pressure
air to blow all condenser lines clean.
EXHIBIT "A-V Continued
5. The Contractor will complete the "HVAC Preventative Maintenance Report" form (see
Exhibit "A-2") for each HVAC unit at each of the ten facilities. This form is completed each
time preventative maintenance is performed.
6. All thermostats shall have an identifying number physically applied to its exterior. This
thermostat number will then be applied to the exterior of the air handler and compressor
units controlled by that thermostat. The Contractor will provide a numbering system, for
each of the ten facilities, which meet the Maintenance Supervisor's approval. Contractor will
apply identifying numbers during the first preventative maintenance check in July.
7. "Exhibit A-Y is an equipment inventory list for all HVAC units. It should be noted that all
filters are located in standard locations in each unit except for units at City Hall. Air filters
on most City Hall units have been removed from the air -handler units and are now located in
the return air registers. It should be noted that "Exhibit A-3" might not show all kitchen hood
exhaust fans and bathroom vent fan equipment. Contractor is responsible for lubricating
and checking belts on these vent fan units.
EXHIBIT "A-2"
CITY OF TEMECULA
HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE REPORT
FACILITIES MANUFACTURE UNIT/SERIAL NO.
❑ City Hall
❑ Maintenance Facility
❑ Community Recreation Center
❑ Temecula Community Center
❑ Mary Phillips Senior Center
❑ Temecula Valley Museum
❑ Chapel of Memories
❑ Temecula Children's Museum
❑ Fire Station #84
❑ Fire Station # 92
❑ Test and observe heating/cooling operation all equipment.
❑ Furnish and replace all air filters to manufacturer's specification.
Size Qty.
❑ Check for correct amperage draw out/unit components.
❑ Check refrigerant system for leaks/proper charge.
❑ Check and clean condensate pans/drains/drain lines.
❑ Check all electrical contacts/relays for wear/lube as needed.
❑ Clean equipment of excessive grease and oil.
❑ Secure all panels, covers, guards, etc.
❑ Inspect drive belts for tension, wear, and alignment.
❑ Inspect/adjust equipment operation and safety controls.
❑ Inspect/adjust furnace burners, ignition equipment, heat exchangers and gas valves.
❑ Inspect fan blades/blowers wheels for balance, condition and cracks.
❑ Check shaft/bearings condition and lubricated as required.
❑ Check all electrical connectors for condition/tightness.
❑ Clean evaporator and condenser coils.
o Brush/clean all return air grills.
❑ Observe air distribution devices for restrictions and adjust as needed.
❑ Check thermostat/time clock system settings and operation. Adjust as directed by
Maintenance Supervisor.
❑ Notify Maintenance Supervisor of any needed repairs.
Remarks:
a)
CD
aE
QE
co
12 O
E O
E O
O
a)
M (O(O.�
M
�N
O
2 O..
Ox
Od'N�
E�� � ��
ik #
O
co
(7 � 7
U � 3k
L) � �t >
� � C �
LL
MO
a0
700
00
N.
M
N.N N N
LO LO to
t
CO
Z
I
V
a 7
10 0 0 O O
LO
It It It
O)
'cr
�
a7
N
M
O) 0)0) O)O)
0
U U U
(O
O
M
1
00
N
r r r P P
O
.O O O
M
N
W
M
N
O O O O O
O
O 0) 0)
O
co
O
co
co
co co, co co to
O
n r, r
O)
W
N
a0
M
W
0) 0)0) m 0
00 O
J
J
J
O
J
J
J J' J J J
_.. -_. _,_
r)
c?
co CD 000
co O
a0 a0 a0
2
.2
CD
O
a
U
m m' m m m
N
N
C4 CN 04 N
O
O
c�
O
>
� > �
O
O
aCf)
0
aao
aao aao co 0a0 0a0
2
2
CO
m
OO
m
O
M
N fn !n fn N
v
V V a
t
L L L
rn
rn rn rn
z
zZZ
�
a`)a`)m
mmm
�°
r
m
m m m
a)
m
m
m
a)
E
U
U
E
C E
w
O
O
O
O O O
O L
O L
O
O
O
O
O O O O O
U
U
U
U U U
U
'U
U
U
U
U
U U U UiU
aaa
aaa
a
a
a
a
a
a
aaaaa
x
2
2
2xx_
x
x
x_ _
x
x
2_
x2x2x
=
_
_
_
N N
N
N
cn
(n
y y
a)
a)
(a
O
as
a)
a) 5 Fa (a a)
2
2
x
2
2
2
x.2222,
.O'.c'O
vvv
21
?-.
_T
L
UUU
L
L
L L L
UUU
U
_T
U
U
_T
U
U
U
UUU!UU
�:c0 n f` CO N Cl) N 1 0 r 10
00 0 c0 m N M 0, 1� [r LO 00 CO
N,N N N N N" N � N,�-N N ,NyN N.N. N N E
V, f`', O r �� N'M CA f- ,'M'c0 0 �'t M, N M h 0'c0co r� O
co fl Il CO (1)� LOt O N 00 � N O r- M M � N N N •-Oi,,N
N NN w m. 0 O C` f` N N N
•� M M N C` O OMC�CO Nd)CO.CO CO CO
N0)W CO, rM Mco
�
CO M coM M M CO CO 0) N,� N co ....
n , r o N 0 0 a m m 0 a -� 0 J'a co, co a0
Vi 0 o 0, 0 ,) 0 00 m m 0) rn 0) m 0) m« 0) 0) O co' O 0)0 m 0)co o w w U
CO O 0 O.00,00 CO a000mmmmaO co OO�ODO coJMIMM0M00MM0J -i00 0 U)U)LOLOLnLOOLOLOLo.LnLOLOLnLo,
GL N N N N N N N N N Cryy a0L A
a a a M M M M M M M M M M M CO-M'CM M.M
p '00O V 0o 0'COOO W W �����������O CO.O COCOW M
CO CO
� �, N M M M M M v `- � '• I I IT IT 1 11 IT 11 IT
0o0o0oo0oo000mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm'
an. a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a an_aaaaaaaa
oQa xx_xxxxxxxxxxxxx2_xxxx-x_==,x=_=xxxx
U W 3
FW„ x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x
0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0
F D � •� •� •� •� •� •� •� •� •� •� � � c c, c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
2'2222SS SSS S S J JJJ JJJ J JJ,J.J JJ J',J,J J
W e"o
u
J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OO OI
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U'U U 010 010 U
a aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
xxxxx=xxxxxxxxxSSxSSxxSxSxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxSxx
>1 T>1 T TT T>1>1 TTT TTT TTTTTTTTTTTTTT
U,U 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U U 0 U U U' U U U_U U_ U U U
C ..T r, L CO W (O qt (Y) 0)
O, I-W V-i 1-00 W t000m NCoN
(p CO N(0 r- N, 0M00M0n04M
W M W W V V W W W � V 0 W 0 (M 0)
N W V W W W W W W M W 0) N
m 'W O O M M o m m W W W W W co V m
0) co N NN N
WW
W �n222C7U' 2222252222�
mo o o o a a m m m m m m a W
aaaaammmmmmmm0a
}}000000000000000U
vv,vavvvvU
vY� ����pOjMvv(00(00f00 W C)
CN
0) C) o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0' m
r,U a a a a a a a.0 UUUUU U,0 a
x x,
0 0 0 y 0 0 o m d d d m d m m m m d
c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c
J J H. H H H HrF_F__H H h._f'..F- F- 1- HF-
U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U
L
X
W LLJ 04
M
0)
LL
00
W
D)
a a a
coco
U 0
J J
U
QQ�Q2
a
0,0
UoUC)IY
}U
0
O
>`
U
c
m
c
2
E
0
c c c
0
U
N
>
�o
W
m
(7 C9 2
a m�
0
v t: V-
co
zw
Z Z Z
UUUUUUUUUUUUUUU U U U U U
00000_UUUUUUUUUU U U U U U
W in
N
c6
N
`-' 7 `-' 7
NL
—_ �
ML
M LO M
O LL W
C N N
LL X
W,-.
LL x LL X
�LLJ
>�
W
WW W W
0
N aCL
O E _N m y
L O'�6 Cc Uj O N
X O a)O 01
WL3�23U_
LO
1
Cl)
N
m
N
m
co
m
0
O
04
N
co
-Q
Cl)
m
m
m
m
m
Q
Q
0
Nr U co
LL
It
co
It
m
m
U
U
m
M Q
o
co
�
ro
a
m
o
c�
o
2 Q
V'�
U
Q
U
Q
Q
Q
Q
o
Lo
CD
0
o
LO
m
M
LO
m
,I-
w
2
w
°o
o
� o°
)
C c a
E
C O
C
N
a
C
C
O- C
E N
a a)
E
CDU
I- 1 U
F. 0
H
J
U
I-
J
U J
U
' w
c
c
> >
c
tE
- c
a)
o
m
o
CU 0)O
a
o
o
.0
Q c
UY
Uc
Yw00
L CLa
m
oo
OOQ
O
00(r W
o�o=0=0EL0
ZZ2
Z.Z
W Z
W Z co
Z !n
fn Y fn Y fn Of
cn Ix
fn
II
co
0
M
J
r-
U
U U
U
U
U U
U
U
U
U
U
S
2 S
2
S
2 S
S
S
2
2
2
U U U U U U U U U U U U
U- U U U U U U U U U _U U
i
7
U- r-LL
7
y
04
N i .
N
M
i0
co
LU LU
� LLI X
Lu
� Q'
= U
U U
_
� _
„w
Q__
c a
N
N
co
co
LO
Cl)O
co
l0
0)
O
N
N
co
O
CD
rn
in
o
r
N O
(h
O
O
co
co
c7
r
cM
O
O
LO
0
Ln
In
M
M
m
m
p
Cl)U
U
O
p
-,
O
p
o
a
a
o
M
co
a
J
a
v
v
v
co
�
N
U
co
•C
•CC
.0
a
C
C
>
>
>
>
C,Q
'O
'O
'O
"O
!N
M 0)
f0
d
(
d
a>
L
0
ca
L
0
CM
m
L
a)
Oi
CcC
L p%
o ca
L
0)
C L
G
Y
p
L
C'
O
C
0 p
C
0
y3
ffY
O
O
C
N
-pC.)
U U
a3
a
a3
ca
cu
acu
cu
TO
O
w
a3
UarUavL)(L
C
CLv0U
w
O
U
w
m
CDC7
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
00
a
>
a
>
a
>
a
a
a
a
a
a
s
as
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
»
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
x
xx
V
V
V
V
'IT
N
N N
00
a0
00
a0
co
00
00
co
0)
0) 0)
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C C
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
fa
fY�6
N
fa
f~�0
W
f~�p
Yp
fA
fn
C/J
CA
U)
.~O•
0)
fn
fA
.y0-.
fA
fA
fn.(q
LL
LL
lL
LL
E
E
E
lL
Il
LL
LL ll
M
N
N
U)
O`
na O
i
m'U
07
ax.aa
�
o
co
CM
0)0
v
a
LO
CY)N
0)
vt
r
U')
N
N
N
LO
'IT
O
V
O
U
O
U
N
N
LO
N
�-
rG
C7
C9
U
N
C9
O1
C7
C7
L11
=
_
=
O
O
O
04
N
O^)
O
O
W
'Z
Z
Z
_.� _
7
.�_
M
-
0
--
2
M
,�
Cl)
O
co
CV-
10.
m
co
Cl)
co
co
LO
CDO
co
LO
r
r
00
Z
Z
Z
c`�o
O
00
Oa0
N
MGO
O
0
0
W
Z
Z
m
O
a
a
a
LL
LL�
U)
LO
-7
Cl)
07
U
Z_
Z_
• Z
O
O
O
N
LL
Q
l
D U
LO
LO
00
V
00
a
Q
00
V
00
V
o.
C 'O
C 'O
m
M
>O
>O
0)
'C
'C
'C
C
>
'C
CE
Z 0) C
2
Y
Y
Y
c0
0)
m
O C
E O)
cu
�
0) MO
C �..
M p
(n a f n
O
i•
O
}
O
U
U
U
a c n
U
U N
U N
o
c0
$
`
o
c?
c
Cc
CL
FLU
FLO
tu
'DN
0°oLoo
_NU
mNHm
U
U U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
I
N
0)
N >.
0)
T
T
T
Z.
�.
T
T
N
N
N
0)
0)
0)
w
M IL
LL
LL
LL
LL
IL
LL
IL
IL
U
U
U
0
O
O
0
O
d
C
'c
C
'c
C
'm
C
'c
C
'm
C
•m
C
•cu
C
'�
C
'�
C
.0
.0
LL
LL 2
2
2
2
2
U
fn
U
WA
N
U
a
O p
N V
CM
o r
CA �
M x
O m
MO O
00
04
z N
U
x
Co U
c c
c
O
N
N T u) 1
= a) L N--
m U U
U
U
U
U
U
U U.0 U,U
axaxaxaa
a
a
a
a
a
aaaaa
00 O, 0) O
O N
M
W
O
O
W
N
O
^a'
0)
�}'
O
d'
0)
V
O
co
W
co
V' to 0 Cl)
to co CO M Co
MI
r
I
N.N NcQ N
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
LL
W W W W W
p
O
N
N
N
1
O,,
N Cl) Cl) Cl) N N 0)O) O O W
x t�r W)cto LON. W)in Lo 000 to V V �v V
m
O NQ
O CO
N_
0
LO
LO
0
0
0
m
Ca
m
w
a)
c
w
c
>
>
>
E
a)
0-0a-0aaC
0:
E
a
a
a
a
s
C
j
> >
>
>
>
O o O
O
O
O�
Q Y Q
Q
Q
Q F-
NNNN
Q a a U Q
00
0
Co
O
O
OOp 000
0
0
0
0
0
Co Cp 0 CO'
O 0 p 0 0
Z Z Z Z,
rn0) 0)
_0)
t0
L L L L
rnrn CD(M
ZZ ZZ
E
E
E
E
E
c c c c
a)
a)
a)
a)
m
Co N N a)
Q,
m
C 0 U Q
7
7
7
7
7
C C C C C
y
U)
N
N
y
O O O O O
_
_
_
_
=
U U U U U
2
2
Z>
rL
L L w r
>
>
>
>
>
.L7 .+
7 7
O O O O O
zzcncncn
a a a a a as a a a a a aaaaa
x x x x x xx x x x x x xxxxx
w?
E
E
E
E
E
E
7
7
0
0
`O
0
`O
02
2
2
2
2
2
.Ec
-Ec
c
c >.
>
>
>
>
00000
>
a)
w
()
(D
a)
a)
U U U U U
cn_ ---
U
U
U
ti
Cn F
H
F
F-:
--
F -. F F- F-
z
n
m
L
U
r
W
QO
Y
a
a
m
L
a,
U
Q
2
m
m
(D m
E CL
HU
EXHIBIT B
PRICING SHEET
HVAC PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE
DESCRIPTION
PRICE PER
QUARTER
PRICE PER YEAR
CITY HALL HVAC
$1,145
$4,580
MAINTENANCE FACILITY HVAC
$160
$640
COMMUNITY RECREATION CENTER HVAC
$670
$2,650
TEMECULA COMMUNITY CENTER HVAC
$100
$400
MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER HVAC
$160
$640
TEMECULA VALLEY MUSEUM HVAC
$75
$300
CHAPEL OF MEMORIES HVAC
$75
$300
TEMECULA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM HVAC
$125
$500
FIRE STATION 84 HVAC
$150
$600
FIRE STATION 92 HVAC
$75
$300
IANNUALTOTAL
$10,940
ALTERNATE BID ITEMS -For repair or extra work authorized by City
MARK-UP ADDED TO CONTRACTOR'S WHOLESALE PRICE
OF PARTS & EQUIPMENT
30%
HOURLY RATE PER REGUALR MAN HOUR-8am To 5pm
$70
Monday through Friday
HOURLY RATE PER OVERTIME MAN HOUR -After-hours,
$105
Weekends, Holidays, etc.
ITEM 3
APPROV
CITY ATTORNEY `2�,(ALVE--
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Inclusion of Tracts into Service Level B and Acceptance of Slope Easement
Areas into Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2004-2005
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst vtl
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD
SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005.
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04 -
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23209, CROWNE HILL AND
HARVESTON DEVELOPMENTS INTO SERVICE LEVEL C FOR MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005.
3. Authorize the City Clerk/District Secretary to record the slope easement documents.
BACKGROUND: Prior to the beginning of each new fiscal year, applications are
reviewed regarding the acceptance of perimeter slope areas, residential street lighting, and the
inclusion of additional subdivisions into existing TCSD maintenance programs. Energy costs for
residential street lighting is provided through Service Level B and perimeter slope and landscape
areas are maintained through Service Level C.
R:\smithb\Assessmen¢\0"5 Assessment\New B&C Staff&Reso.dm
For Fiscal Year 2004-2005, thirteen (13) tracts and the parcels within those tracts will be levied
within the Service Level B Rates and Charges at $25.68 per parcel, as follows:
Tract Map Number
Total No of Units
Tract No.
23143-00
96
Tract No.
23143-01
81
Tract No.
23143-06
114
Tract No.
23173-08
105
Tract No.
23143-10
71
Tract No.
23143-11
96
Tract No.
29928-00
37
Tract No.
29928-01
33
Tract No.
29928-02
39
Tract No.
29928-03
31
Tract No.
29929-00
47
Tract No.
29929-01
72
Tract No.
30088-00
41
Total
863
In addition, the following tracts have completed the necessary Proposition 218 proceedings for the
transfer of perimeter landscaping into the TCSD maintenance program (Service Level C) beginning
Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Existing Rate Level #4 - $175.00 — Crowne Hill
Tract Map No.
23143-01
81
Tract Map No.
23143-06
114
Tract Map No.
23143-07
85
Tract Map No.
23143-08
105
Tract Map No.
23143-09
127
Tract Map No.
23143-10
71
Tract Map No.
23143-11
96
Tract Map No.
23143-00
96
Total
775
New Rate Level #9 - $200.00 — Serena Hills
Tract Map No. 23209 220
New Rate Level #10 - $100.00 - Harveston
Tact Map No.
29928-00
37
Tract Map No.
29928-01
33
Tract Map No.
29928-02
39
Tract Map No.
29928-03
31
Tract Map No.
29929-00
47
Tract Map No.
29929-01
72
Tract Map No.
30088-00
41
Total
300
Grand Total 1,295
R:\smidtb\Assessm is\0"5 Asuss=nANew B&C Stafr&Reso.dm
FISCAL IMPACT: Acceptance of the aforementioned tracts and the parcels within those
tracts into the appropriate service levels has been incorporated into the TCSD budgets for Service
Level B and C for Fiscal Year 2004-2005
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution to accept certain tracts into Service Level B.
2. Resolution to accept certain slopes into Service Level C
RAsn*hb\Amssme MG4-05 Assessm WNm B&C Smff&Reso.dm
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN SLOPE AND
LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 23209, CROWNE HILL AND
HARVESTON DEVELOPMENTS INTO SERVICE LEVEL C FOR MAINTENANCE
PURPOSES BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. As a result of the passing of a property owner election for following tract
maps, the property owners have requested that the TCSD assume maintenance of the
landscaping along the perimeter of their developments.
Existing Rate Level #4 - $175.00 — Crowne Hill
Tract Map No.
23143-01
81
Tract Map No.
23143-06
114
Tract Map No.
23143-07
85
Tract Map No.
23143-08
105
Tract Map No.
23143-09
127
Tract Map No.
23143-10
71
Tract Map No.
23143-11
96
Tract Map No.
23143-00
96
Total Parcels
775
New Rate Level #9 - $200.00 — Serena Hills
Tract Map No. 23209 220
New Rate Level #10 - $100.00 - Harveston
Tact Map No.
29928-00
37
Tract Map No.
29928-01
33
Tract Map No.
29928-02
39
Tract Map No.
29928-03
31
Tract Map No.
29929-00
47
Tract Map No.
29929-01
72
Tract Map No.
30088-00
41
Total Parcels
300
Parcels Grand Total 1,295
B. The annual parcel charges for perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance services pursuant to Proposition 218, were established by the majority of the
property owners of the various tracts.
C. The Temecula Community Services District is the existing authorized
legislative body authorized to provide maintenance of perimeter slope and landscape areas
within the aforementioned developments.
RAsn ithb\Assess=nMG4-05 Assesswnt%Nm B&C Staff&Reso.dm
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District
hereby accepts:
A. The offer of dedication for the improved slopes and perimeter landscaping
within Tract Map No. 23209, Crowne Hill and Harveston Developments; and
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community
Services District at a regular meeting held on the 8th of June, 2004.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly
adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular
meeting thereof, held on the 8th day of June, 2004, by the following vote of the Board of
Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS:
RAsmhhb\Assessments\G4-05 Assessment\New B&C Staff&Reso.dm
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ACCEPTING CERTAIN TRACTS INTO TCSD
SERVICE LEVEL B FOR PURPOSES OF FUNDING THE ENERGY CHARGES
FOR RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DOES
RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors does hereby find and determine as follows:
A. The Temecula Community Services District has assumed costs
associated with energizing the street lighting within the following residential Tract Map Nos.:
Tract Map Number
Total No of Units
Tract No.
23143-00
96
Tract No.
23143-01
81
Tract No.
23143-06
114
Tract No.
23173-08
105
Tract No.
23143-10
71
Tract No.
23143-11
96
Tract No.
29928-00
37
Tract No.
29928-01
33
Tract No.
29928-02
39
Tract No.
29928-03
31
Tract No.
29929-00
47
Tract No.
29929-01
72
Tract No.
30088-00
41
Total
863
B. The Temecula Community Services District is currently providing
residential street lighting services within these subdivisions through Service Level B; and
C. The Temecula Community Services District is the authorized
legislative body to accept the responsibility of energizing residential streetlights within the City of
Temecula.
Section 2. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District hereby
accepts the aforementioned residential tracts into the Service Level B rate level for residential street
lighting services beginning Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Section 3. The Secretary shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution.
RAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\New B&C Staff&Reso.dm
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District at a regular meeting held on the 8th of June, 2004.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly adopted by
the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting thereof,
held on the 8th day of June 2004, by the following vote of the Board of Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
ABSTAIN: DIRECTORS:
R:\smidtb\Assessments\0"5 Assessment\New B&C Staff&Reso.dm
ITEM 4
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY �lJP
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: TCSD Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2004-2005
PREPARED BY: Barbara Smith, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D — REFUSE AND
RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-
2005
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL R — ROAD
MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-2005
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the TCSD Rates and Charges is to provide necessary
community services and programs to property owners within the City of Temecula. The TCSD
operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and its boundaries are the same as
those of the City of Temecula.
R:\mthMAssessments\04-05 Assessment\Staff-BCD&R.dm 06/11/01
Property owners pay only for the TCSD services used or made available to their property through
separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and
Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by
the City's Parks/Street Lighting Special Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4,
1997. Although the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities
through a cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax is to be
considered and approved by the City Council on June 8, 2004.
As a result, the TCSD is currently comprised of the following four (4) remaining service levels:
Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of residential street lighting.
Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping. Operations, maintenance, utility costs,
improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
3. Service Level D — Refuse and Recycling Collection. Operation and administration of
the refuse and recycling program for single family residential homes.
4. Service Level R - Road Maintenance. Operations, construction, and
maintenance of certain unpaved streets and roads in the City.
Service Level "B" includes only those parcels within residential subdivisions that receive street
lighting services. The proposed rate of $25.68 per property owner has not been increased from last
fiscal year.
Service Level "C" includes only those parcels within residential subdivisions receiving TCSD
perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance. Rate C-8 was created in FY 03-04 for Tract Map
19872 along Pechanga Parkway but was not utilized due to construction delays. The rates C-9 and
C-10 are new this year, C-9 was established forthe Serena Hills Development on near Walcott Lane
and La Serena Way; and rate C-10 was established for the Harveston Development on the north
section of the City. The previously existing eight (8) rate levels for Service Level "C" will not change
from last fiscal year. The rate levels are identified as follows:
Rate C-1:
$ 46.00
Rate C-2:
$ 89.00
Rate C-3:
$116.00
Rate C-4:
$175.00
Rate C-5:
$ 70.00
Rate C-6:
$225.00
Rate C-7:
$129.00
Rate C-8
$ 20.00*
Rate C-9
$200.00
Rate C-10
$100.00
*For Fiscal Year 2004-2005 the assessment will be $10.00. Due to construction delays the
landscaping will only be in place for approximately six (6) months.
R:\smithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Staff-BCD&R.dw
Service Level "D" provides refuse and recycling services to all single-family residential properties in
the City of Temecula. The Service Level "D" residential rate is contractually mandated to change
based on the 2003 CPI and the Riverside County Tipping Fee rate. The 2003 CPI rate is 2.6 % and
on May 25, 2004 the Riverside County Board of Supervisors approved Ordinance 779.5 with a 1.8%
increase in tipping fees to become effective on July 1, 2004. The FY 04-05 contractual rate is
proposed at $180.70 which is 2.51% increase over last year's contractual rate of $176.28.
As per Proposition 218 all property owners are required to be noticed as to the rates and charges
that the TCSD will be assessing at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notices were produced
and mailed on April 20, 2004. The notice stated the rate for Service Level "D" would be $179.86
based on the CPI adjustment only. Due to the late notice of the Riverside County tipping fee
increase the 1.8% adjustment factor was not included in the Service Level "D" rate calculation. The
City will assess single-family residential property owners the noticed rate of $179.86 and subsidize
the difference between the contractual rate of $180.70 which is $0.84 from fund balance. The
number of assessed properties in Service Level "D" is 19,944 which would bring the total subsidyto
$16,752.96.
Service Level "R" includes only those parcels, which receive services forthe maintenance of certain
unpaved roads that become inaccessible after inclement weather. The proposed rate R-1 for this
service level will not increase from last year. Due to the formation of the John Warner Assessment
District which has funded the paving of several roads in the R-2 area, the cost to maintain the area
has decreased. The new rate R-2 for FY 04-05 is $95.86 which is a 21.37% decrease from the FY
03-04 rate of $121.92 for developed property. The new R-2 rate for vacant property is $47.94 which
is also a 21.37% decrease from the FY 03-04 rate of $60.96. The two (2) rate levels for Service
Level "R" are identified as follows:
Residential Rate R-1: $115.26
Vacant Rate R-1: $ 57.64
Residential Rate R-2: $ 95.86
Vacant Rate R-2: $ 47.94
The levy formula used to fund these services has not been changed from last fiscal year. Only
those property owners who receive services from a particular service level pay for those services.
The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges
are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD.
FISCAL IMPACT: The total Levy Budget for Service Levels B, C, and D for Fiscal Year
2004-2005 is $5,267,344. The total Levy Budget for Service Level R is $9,160. The revenue
generated from the TCSD Rates and Charges will fund perimeter landscaping; residential street
lighting; refuse and recycling collection services; and unpaved road maintenance in the City of
Temecula.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. CSD 04-_ Service Levels B, C, and D.
2. Resolution No. CSD 04- Service Level R.
3. Final Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
RAsmithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Staff-BCD&R.dm
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING
RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL
STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER
LANDSCAPING, AND SERVICE LEVEL D — REFUSE AND
RECYCLING COLLECTION SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004-
2005
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide
specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD
has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has
elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same
persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the
TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By
previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation,
maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, and
recycling and refuse collection services for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 2003-2004. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of
Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including
necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed
rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary', and incorporated
herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD,
and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of
the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed
rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and
affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On June 8, 2004, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on
the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard
and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person
concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates
and charges.
RAsn ithb\Assess=nmk04-05 Assessrnent\Rates & Charges-Reso B, C, D & R.dm
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the
District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost of
the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, and
refuse and recycling collection services for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 as set out on Exhibit "A".
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in
the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property
taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and
thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable
to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those
pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are
applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section
4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates
has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide
encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first
installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the
property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2004-2005, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges orthe application of the rates and
charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by
filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or
correction of errors program.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship
appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to procedures
established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 11, 2004, the
Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not exempt
there from; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized,
instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that
roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources
Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and
charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
R:\smithb\Assessments\B4-05 AssessmenA\ ws & Charges-Reso B, C, D & R.dm
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 8th day of June 2004.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting
thereof, held on the 8th day of June, 2004, by the following vote of the Board of Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS:
R:\smithb\Assess==\G4-05 Assessm w\Rams & Charges-Reso B, C, D & R.dm
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVELS B, C, AND D
On January 1, 2002, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the Cityof Temecula to prepare the
Annual Levy Report forthe Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) forthe Fiscal Year 2003-
2004. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the Government
Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et sea., the TCSD has the power to
levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and
facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as follows:
1. Service Level B - Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs
and administration of all residential street lights.
2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping. Operations, maintenance, utility costs,
improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope
maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD.
3. Service Level D — Refuse and Recycling Services. Operations and administration of
the refuse and recycling program, and street sweeping services for all single-family
residential homes.
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes Service Levels B, C, and D with their total levy
budgets for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEL/LEVY BUDGET
RATE LEVEL
PARCEL CHARGE
Service Level B $ 481,680
N/A
$ 25.68
Service Level C $1,198,536
C-1
$ 46.00
C-2
$ 89.00
C-3
$116.00
C-4
$175.00
C-5
$ 70.00
C-6
$225.00
C-7
$129.00
C-8
$ 20.00'
C-9
$200.00
C-10
$100.00
Service Level D $3,587,128
$179.86
'For Fiscal Year 04-05 the assessment will be $10.00. Landscaping will only be in place for approximately six (6) months.
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVELS
B, C, AND D: $ 5,267,344
R:\smhhb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Rates & Charges -Reno B, C, D & R.dm
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES
FOR SERVICE LEVEL R- ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL
YEAR 2004-2005
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICE
DISTRICT HEREBY FINDS, RESOLVES, DECLARES, DETERMINES AND ORDERS AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1,1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide
specified services to properties within its jurisdiction.
Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the TCSD
has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has
elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same
persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes within the
TCSD in the manner prescribed by Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive. By
previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the maintenance of
streets and roads for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, the TCSD caused a
written report ("Report') to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report
contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and
charges for Fiscal Year 2004-2005. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of
Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided, including
necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary or the Report containing the proposed
rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary', and incorporated
herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD,
and is available for public inspection.
Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of
the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed
rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed and published as required by law and
affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD.
Section 5. On June 8, 2004, the Board of Directors conducted a public hearing on
the Report and the proposed rates and charges. At the public hearing, the Board of Directors heard
and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by any interested person
concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates
and charges.
Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the
District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" does not exceed the reasonable cost
of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
RAsmithb\Asmss=m\04-05 Assessmem\Rates & Charges-Reso B, C, D & R.dm
Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and
protests and adopts the rates and charges for the road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2004-
2005 as set out on Exhibit "A" for the services to be provided by the TCSD.
Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in
the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property
taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and
thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable
to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those
pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are
applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section
4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates
has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien of a bona fide
encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first
installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the
property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection.
Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the
classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2004-2005, or claims that an error has been
made with respect to the implementation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and
charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by
filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to
procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or
correction of errors program.
Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that
payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2004-2005 would create a hardship for that
property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship
appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2004, pursuant to procedures
established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program.
Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be
transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 11, 2004, the
Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated foreach parcel not exempt
there from; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized,
instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of all such rates and charges as shown on that
roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore.
Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and
collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources
Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and
charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD.
Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District this 8th day of June 2004.
RAsmithb\Assessments\B4-05 AssessmenARaws & Charges -Reno B, C. D & R.doe
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04- was duly adopted
by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at the regular meeting
thereof, held on the 8th day of June 2004, by the following vote of the Board of Directors.
AYES: DIRECTORS:
NOES: DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: DIRECTORS
RAsmithMAssessments\04-05 Assessment\Rates & Charges-Rm B, C, D & R.dm
EXHIBIT A
PROJECT SUMMARY
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SERVICE LEVEL R
On January 1, 2002, MuniFinancial, Inc. was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare
the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for the Fiscal
Year 2004-2005. Pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Division 3 of Title 6 of the
Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61000 et seg., the TCSD
has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to
provide the services and facilities furnished by it.
The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and
description of each parcel within a specific service level. A Service Level is a defined area that
provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels
contained within that service level, as follows:
Service Level R — Road Maintenance Services. Construction, installation, and
maintenance of streets and roads throughout the City.
The Financial Analysis contained herein includes the Service Level R total levy budget for Fiscal
Year 2004-2005 to be as follows:
SERVICE LEVEULEVY BUDGET RATE LEVEL PARCEL CHARGE
Service Level R
TOTAL TCSD LEVY
FOR SERVICE LEVEL R:
$9,160 R-1Improved
R-1 Unimproved
R-2 Improved
R-2 Unimproved
$9,160
$115.26
$ 57.64
$ 95.86
$ 47.94
R:\smithb\Assessments\04-05 Assessment\Rates & Charges -Reno B, C, D & R.dm
CITY OF TEMECULA
ENGINEER'S ANNUAL LEVY REPORT
Temecula Community Services District
(TCSD)
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
INTENT MEETING: April 13 2004
PUBLIC HEARING: June 8, 2004
Corporate Office
27368 Via Industria
Suite 110
Temecula, CA 92590
Tel: (909) 587-3500
Tel: (800) 755-MUNI (6864)
Fax:(909) 587-3510
MuniFinancial
Office Locations
Anaheim, CA
Jacksonville, FL
Lancaster, CA
Los Angeles Regional Office
Oakland, CA
www.muni.com
Pensacola, FL
Phoenix, AZ
Sacramento, CA
Seattle, WA
ENGINEER'S REPORT AFFIDAVIT
Establishment of Annual Rates and Charges for the:
Temecula Community Services District (TCSD)
City of Temecula
Riverside County, State of California
This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each
of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to
those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention.
Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed
description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned
respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District.
Dated this day of 2004.
MuniFinancial
District Engineer
On Behalf of the City of Temecula and
The Temecula Community Services District
0
Scott Dippolito
Senior Project Manager, District Administration Services
By:
Richard Kopecky
R. C. E. # 16742
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................1
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS.........................................................3
A. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE DISTRICT AND SERVICES...........................................3
B. BUDGET AND LEVY SUMMARY...................................................................................3
C. DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES...........................................................................5
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT............................................................9
A. NOTABLE MODIFICATIONS TO THE DISTRICT...............................................................9
B. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS OF THE DISTRICT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005................9
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS..............................................................................12
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT.....................................................14
APPENDIX A - 2004/2005 COLLECTION ROLL..............................16
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
I. INTRODUCTION
Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula ("City"), effective December 1, 1989,
voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District
("District") to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction
previously provided by the County of Riverside ("County"). The boundary of the
District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the
City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors ("Board") for the
District. The District collects property -related fees and charges ("Charges") in
order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The
District was formed, and Charges are set and established, pursuant to the
Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the Califomia Government
Code ("CSD Law").
Each fiscal year, an Annual Levy Report is prepared, filed and approved by the
Board. This Annual Levy Report describes the District, any changes to the
District and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The Charges contained in
the Annual Levy Report are based on the historical and estimated cost to service
properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the
corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and
include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is
charged for the services provided to the parcel.
The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope
protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well
as road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District.
Pursuant to Government Code Sections 61621 and 61621.2, the District has
prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting
(Service Level B), perimeter landscaping (Service Level C), trash/recycling
(Service Level D), and road maintenance (Service Level R) services furnished by
the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax
roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together
with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by
Government Code Sections 61765.2 to 61765.6, inclusive.
Pursuant to Government Code Section 61621.2, this Engineer's Annual Levy
Report ("Report") is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service
Level B, Service Level C, Service Level D and Service Level R Rates and
Charges for the parcels and territories within the District.
MuniFinancial Page 1
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property
assigned its own Assessment Number or Assessor's Parcel Number by the
Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller
uses Assessment Numbers and specific Fund Numbers, to identify on the tax
roll, properties charged for District services.
A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an
opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration
of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and
review of the Engineer's Annual Levy Report, the Board may order amendments
to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the
Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and
collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. In such case, the levy
information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller, and
included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in
Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
MuniFinancial Page 2
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
II. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A. General Description of the District and Services
The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary, and
includes all parcels within the City of Temecula. The District provides certain
property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate
and distinct services referred to as Service Levels. Each parcel within the
District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the
parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services
provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the
service. The costs associated with the service are proportionately spread
among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is
provided. Services and improvements provided through the District include
residential street lighting; perimeter landscape maintenance and slope
protection; a refuse and recycling collection program; and road improvement
construction and maintenance. The Service Levels are identified as follows:
• Residential Street Lighting
• Perimeter Landscaping
• Trash/Recycling
• Road Maintenance
B. Budget and Levy Summary
The budgets for each Service Level are shown in detail in Section IV of this
report. Each Service Level provides different and specific services and
improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the
services and improvements are levied for are included at each of the Service
Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge Per Levy Unit"
(shown in Table 1), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly
proportions the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The
"Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and D is based on a per parcel
count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel count, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete
description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for
each Service Level, please refer to (Section V), Method of Apportionment.
MuniFinancial Page 3
U V LQ
O O
aO
❑ OV
m O
J N
cc
(D j }
Z C U
C Q N
M LL
E adi
O C
U 'm
co W
0
N
E
F
LU
J
Q
H
D
L0
oowmmm000
V
1m V ob
N
d
I�
t 0 W V V 0 N N O
OOWMMNf
V
f MO
V Nth
o
cl
Oi
~c0
>.0
>
O
000000000 O
o
O
00
If1
) �U)
O
I�
O O O O O O O O O O
GO>(O th M OiC00
O
r
O
O O
N
O
Lo
V <ON V V CO NNO
O
tON
p
C
h
OOtO t�]th Nl� V Nc'�
O
-7Ci- .-
C
0)
0
O
0
N
ry
d>
o
e e o 0 o a° a° e° o o
a
o 0
C d Y
O
O
0000000 000
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
V
O f�
d J C
m
N
o M
Z
o
0000000000
0
0
u
U d=
O O O
N
d
Hl
IL
d
p �Y
0(O00
to
0I�0
co
N
ad
OcD HOC 70OCO
O
��
=d
oJ=
NCNN-0
)
UN
y�
o
coo V o0 0oo
m
comvp
N>'
d
w
CO V N O 1 0000
M
cq
V- W
J
(O
v0 M0 MOI0 NNOO
0
1O
9
r V LL] g V N, 4 O
.
f�
1'N mi
Ib
V M 0)0 O N V M
m!
00
69 to
O m
VV
N V N
r
Lo
a
O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
V
N
.
N
N O
O)
In
O Oi t0 1(7 0 O) 0 0 0
N
N
L0
M
J C
r
NN
O
N N
I
O
t^
d �
59
b9
U
N
a
y
j
a
o o 00 Lo O In 000
10
In
CO CO
}
d
ao0_cV')_aoD t�D f�O.N
n
�mMf
J
rn
l0
nv vi oiv 0)�o�
V 0f0
rn
1�tiN
W
V�
W N
fA N N
O
M
fA �
N
O
w
U.
y
�
m
m
m
a
w
N
Li
d
C
N
N
L
C
C
N
J
I
C_
p
m
Y
a
d
N
N
m
m
•° o
m
�
Q
-
C
i
y)
d
j�N 1`fv If1 ip AOO�ti
Cf
9
W�V
•Z
•00K RM--' R.
Y
4
0#9II�*�#1
V
m#�
d
m d
d
dm
>>>
>d>mmmdd
R_
•�V
d
®
y
NJdd Jdm Jmd Jmd
JJJJJJ
>d m m m d d d d mm m
y
y
Y1
OIJ J d
tu m
N
J
J A 10 10 N N A R i0 W
N
R A
Jy
J
1
J J
Zd
d
d
�d
VJ
N
M
WV)
N
o m v
m 0 C m
O N N O
m � L
m
y�m<o
y
GU� Z�m
fV C�
m ICJ `O
m y a E
rc > v
m n m
6 N� h
m
r $ m
a o m
Eo me
��A c
m � c v
wpm,
AL
y
mmm8
c o a
ysU6
O.O y
E O N c
m O m
v'm m m - m
J m-
v
o$Mo
a LL
y m m E
8��
3 ,1 j N
C m C 9
O 8 L
5 L°MW
8'
s=s�.
w v
c Z £
mN>0
>o-
i68808
D O L d 6
"10nm�
�+YWmO
LL
8 n
y
O N p F .-
VIL d m�
h - - 6
7 O 12
uLL3°a9i
m y
L O m O N
C
H
�oddc
0 m m m
c} LL
azt8
Vp L
Q O c 1i
NCO cc
U NM d
Q O
N H a a
4i
Z
r.
L
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
C. District Services and Charges
Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting — includes all developed
single family residential parcels and residential vacant lots for which the
District provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of local
street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level
B is $25.68 per residential lot and shall be applied to developed and
undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions
for Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
Service Level B Tracts
04153-00 19939-00 20882-03 21760-00 23100-07 23267-03 24134-03 28480-00
04188-00 19939-01 20987-00 21765-00 23100-08 23267-04 24135-00 28482-00
04457-00 19939-02 21067-00 22148-00 23101-01 23371-00 24135-01 28482-01
06559-00 20079-00 21082-00 22203-00 23101-02 23371-01 24135-02 28482-02
07401-00 20079-01 21082-01 22204-00 23101-03 23371-02 24135-03 28482-03
07402-00 20079-02 21082-02 22208-00 23101-04 23371-03 24136-00 28503-00
08369-00 20079-03 21082-03 22593-00 23101-05 23371-04 24136-01 28510-00
08369-01 20130-00 21082-04 22593-01 23101-06 23371-05 24136-02 28510-01
08369-02 20130-01 21340-00 22593-02 23125-00 23371-06 24136-03 28510-02
11087-01 20130-02 21340-01 22627-00 23125-01 23371-07 24182-01 28510-03
11087-02 20130-03 21340-02 22627-01 23125-02 23371-08 24182-02 28526-00
12189-01 20130-04 21340-03 22715-00 23125-03 23371-09 24182-03 28553-00
12189-02 20130-05 21340-04 22715-01 23126-00 23371-10 24182-04 28553-01
12189-03 20130-06 21340-05 22715-02 23128-00 23371-11 24183-00 28810-00
12189-04 20153-00 21340-06 22716-00 23142-00 23371-14 24183-01 29033-00
12189-05 20154-00 21340-07 22716-01 23143-00 23483-00 24184-00 29036-00
12189-06 20319-00 21430-01 22716-02 23143-01 24131-00 24184-01 29286-00
12189-07 20643-00 21561-00 22716-03 23143-02 24131-01 24185-00 29928-00
13060-01 20644-00 21672-01 22716-04 23143-03 24131-02 24185-01 29928-01
13060-02 20703-01 21672-02 22761-00 23143-04 24131-03 24185-02 29928-02
13060-03 20703-02 21672-03 22762-00 23143-06 24132-00 24186-00 29928-03
13060-04 20703-03 21672-04 22786-00 23143-07 24132-01 24186-01 29929-00
13060-05 20735-01 21673-00 22915-00 23143-08 24133-00 24186-02 29929-01
13060-06 20735-02 21673-01 22915-01 23143-09 24133-01 24186-03 30088-00
13060-07 20735-03 21673-02 22915-02 23143-10 24133-02 24187-00 PM 26488
13060-08 20735-04 21673-03 22915-03 23143-11 23173-01 24187-01 PM 27493
18518-00 20735-05 21674-00 22916-00 23173-00 23173-02 24187-02 PM 28122
18518-01 20735-06 21674-01 22916-01 23174-03 23173-03 24188-01 Old Town
18518-02 20735-07 21674-02 22916-02 23174-04 23173-04 24232-00
18518-03 20735-08 21674-03 22916-03 23174-05 23174-01 25004-01
18583-00 20735-09 21675-00 22962-00 23174-06 23174-02 25892-00
19872-00 20848-00 21675-01 23100-01 23177-00 24133-03 26488-00
19872-01 20879-00 21675-02 23100-02 23209-00 24133-04 27827-00
19872-02 20879-01 21675-03 23100-03 23220-00 24133-05 27827-01
19872-03 20882-00 21675-04 23100-04 23267-00 24134-00 27827-02
19872-04 20882-01 21675-05 23100-05 23267-01 24134-01 27827-03
19872-05 20882-02 21675-06 23100-06 23267-02 24134-02 28309-00
MuniFinancial Page 5
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping — includes all developed single
family residential parcels and residential vacant lots for which the District
provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter
landscaped areas and slopes within the public right-of-ways and dedicated
easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The
level of maintenance required within these tracts and subdivisions vary
depending on operating costs. Ten (10) subzones and their corresponding rates
have been established within Service Level C.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-1 is $ 46.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-2 is $ 89.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-3 is $116.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-4 is $175.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-5 is $ 70.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-6 is $225.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-7 is $129.00.
• The proposed rate for C-8 is $10.00, and the maximum rate is $20.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-9 is $200.00.
• The proposed and maximum rate for C-10 is $100.00.
The current rate and charges for Service Level C is per residential lot and shall
be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the
following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2004/2005.
Rate Level C-1
Tract Name
Presley Development
Rancho Solana
The Vineyards
Monte Vista
Rate Level C-2
Service Level C Tracts
Tract Numbers
23267-00
23267-01
26861-02
26861-03
22593-00
22593-01
20879-00
20879-01
28309-00
23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01
22593-02
Tract Name
Tract Numbers
Morrison Homes
22148-00
Ridgeview
20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 21764-00 27493-PM
Winchester Creek
20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04
21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04
21340-07
Woodcrest Country
21561-00 22208-00
20130-05 20130-06
21340-05 21340-06
MuniFinancial Page 6
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Rate Level C-3
Tract Name
Tract Numbers
Martinique
23128-00
Rancho Highlands
20643-00
20644-00
21760-00
22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00
Saddlewood
18518-00
18518-01
18518-02
18518-03
Vintage Hills
22715-00
22715.01
22715-02
22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03
22716-04
22915-00
22915-01
22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01
22916-02
22916-03
28122-PM
Lennar
29286-00
Rate Level C-4
Tract Name
Tract Numbers
Barclay Estates
25004-01
Meadow View
21765-00
Signet Series
20882-00
20882-01
20882-02
20882-03
Tradewinds
23125-00
23125-01
23125.02
23125-03
Village Grove
21672-01
21672-02
21672-03
21672-04 21673-00 21673-01 21673-02
21673-03
21674-00
21674-01
21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01
21675-02
21675-03
21675-04
21675-05 21675-06
Crowne Hill 23143-00 23143-01 23143-02 23143-03 23143-04 23143-06 23143-07
23143-08 23143-09 23143-10 23143-11
Rate Level C-5
Tract Name Tract Numbers
Temeku Hills 23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23371-04 23371-05 23371-06
23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 23371-15
28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00
Rate Level C-6
Tract Name Tract Numbers
Woodside 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03
Rate Level C-7
Tract Name Tract Numbers
Vail Ranch 23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02
23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 28832-00
Rate Level C-8
Tract Numbers
Loma Linda 19872-00 19872-01 19872-02 19872-03 19872-04 19872-05
MuniFinancial Page 7
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Rate Level C-9
Tract Name Tract Numbers
Shea Homes 23209
Rate Level C-10
Tract Name Tract Numbers
Harveston Development 29928-00 29928-01 29928-02 29928-03
29929-00 29929-01
30088-00
Service Level D, Trash/Recycling Collection — provides for the operation
and administration of the refuse collection program including recycling and
street sweeping services for all developed single family residential homes
within the District. The rate and charges for Fiscal Year 2004/2005 for
Service Level D is $179.86 per single family residential home (developed
residential parcel) and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified
as developed residential homes.
Service Level R, Road Maintenance — provides funding for construction,
improvement, service and maintenance of public streets and roads
throughout the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited
to: renovation or restoration due to damage; flood and drainage control;
repairs and re -grading; and upgrades of the existing areas as required for
unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R, share in the cost
of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are
proportionately spread among all parcels within various areas (rate levels) of
the Service Level R. Service Level R currently has two (2) rate levels. The
level of maintenance required within these two (2) areas vary due to
operating costs, and therefore separate rate levels have been established.
Only the parcels within each of the two (2) boundary areas will be charged for
the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in
the area.
• Rate Level R-1 —The parcels within this rate level consists of seventy-
five (75) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets
that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level
provides funding for servicing and maintenance of: Kimberly Lane;
Greenwood Lane; Liefer Road; Gatlin Road; Pala Vista. A total of 1.546
miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
• Rate Level R-2 —The parcels within this rate level consists of thirty-four
(34) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that
are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides
funding for servicing and maintenance of Santiago Road. A total of 0.36
miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area.
MuniFinancial Page 8
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
III. CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT
Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include, but are
not limited to: changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types
of services provided; addition of new services or Service Levels; restructuring of
the current Service Levels; inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels;
or revisions in the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the
District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following.
A. Notable Modifications to the District
On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund
citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service
Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District.
Community Services, Parks, and Recreation — that provided for the
maintenance, service and operation of all public parks and recreation
services within the City.
Service Level A, Arterial Street Lighting and Medians — that provided
servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting and
landscaped medians along arterial streets.
Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997/1998 these two Service Levels were replaced
by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District.
B. Proposed Modifications of the District for Fiscal Year 2004/2005
The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2004/2005 is
related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as
a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the
District accepts additional improvements for maintenance and servicing.
Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts
are included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and
services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific
and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development are included in these
two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally,
individual residential parcels are included in Service Level D when a new
single family residential unit is identified and service is ordered.
MuniFinancial Page 9
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Service Level B
Inclusions to Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting) include 863
additional residential units for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The following tracts are
the new developments for Fiscal Year 2004/2005:
Tract Number
Total Number of Units
23143-00
96
23143-01
81
23143-06
114
23143-08
105
23143-10
71
23143-11
96
29928-00
37
29928-01
33
29928-02
39
29928-03
31
29929-00
47
29929-01
72
30088-00
41
Total
863
The number of units for each of the tracts referenced for inclusion in Service
Level B represents the total number of residential parcels and lots within that
tract. Although these tracts have been fully subdivided or a tract map has
been approved, in some cases, the actual Assessor's Parcel Numbers
(APN's) for each of the individual residential parcels may not have been
established by the County Assessor's Office. In such cases, the APN's
currently recognized by the County are assigned and charged for the number
of residential lots associated with each parcel within the tract. The new APN's
for each of the individual residential parcels and lots are expected to be
established by the time the levy is submitted to the County, but if not, the
existing APN's will be charged based on the number of residential lots
associated with each APN.
Service Level C
There are a total of 940 assessable parcels added to Service Level C
(Perimeter Landscaping), for FY 2004/2005. Subzone C-8 (Loma Linda
Tract), C-9 (Shea Homes) and C-10 (Harveston Development) have been
annexed into the District. The project areas were under construction during
FY 2003/2004. Maintenance of the perimeter landscaping and slopes has
been accepted by Temecula Community Services Department. The
estimated completion of construction is scheduled June of 2004. The new
subzones will be levied for the first time in FY 2004/2005.
In addition, 775 assessable parcels were also added to the existing subzone
C-4. The tract added is known as Crowne Hill Development. The tract will
levied for the first time in FY 2004/2005.
MuniFinancial Page 10
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Service Level D
A total of 761 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and
added to Service Level D (Trash/Recycling) for Fiscal Year 2004/2005. New
single family residential units are identified each year and included in Service
Level D based city building permits and the waste hauler's updated service
records.
The actual cost (contractual rate) per household for this service for Fiscal
Year 2003/2004 was $176.28. A contribution from the General Fund was
used to offset the rate increase, there by reducing the charge for this service
to a rate of $172.54 for Fiscal Year 2003/2004. For Fiscal Year 2004/2005,
the contractual cost for Service Level D per household is $180.70. This
represents a 2.51 % increase from FY 2003/2004 contractual rate. The new
rate of $180.70 shall cover the increased hauler costs based on 2003 CPI
and an increase of the Riverside County Waste Management Tipping Fee
(Tip Fee) rate. Notice of the Tip Fee increase occurred recently and the
additional fee was not incorporated into the assessed rate of $179.86. The
difference between the contractual and assessed rate is $0.84 per parcel,
which will be subsidized from Fund Balance. For more information, please
refer to the section titled "District Budgets." The costs for the District
represents actual service costs, as provided in the City's franchise agreement
with the contracted waste hauler (CR&R).
Service Level R
There are 32 parcels that have been deannexed from Service Level R (Road
Maintenance) beginning Fiscal Year 2004/2005. The parcels are located in
the boundary area of Rate Level R-2. The parcels have become part of the
John Warner Assessment District. The assessment district was formed to
issue bonds to take over funding for servicing and maintenance along John
Warner Road, Lolita Road, Paulita Road and Clover Court. Consequently,
the costs to maintain the roads for the remaining parcels in Rate Level R-2
decreased from $121.92 to $95.86 per parcel development units. For details,
please refer to the section of this report titled "Method of Apportionment".
This change represents a 21.37% decrease as compared to the prior fiscal
year.
MuniFinancial Page 11
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
IV. DISTRICT BUDGETS
The Tables on the next two (2) pages shows the District budget for Fiscal Year
2004/2005.
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2005
Acct.
Budget Items No.
Level B
192
Level C
193
Level D
194
Level R
195
Total
District
PERSONNEL SERVICES
$4,959
$241,472
$38,471
$0
$284,902
Subtotal
$4,959
$241,472
$38,471
$0
$284,902
OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE
Repair & Maintenance Facilities 5212
$0
$46,000
$0
$0
$46,000
Office Supplies 5220
200
0
0
0
200
Printing 5222
0
0
11,000
0
11,000
Election Costs (Offset by Developer
Deposits) 5225
1,000
500
0
0
1,500
Dues and Memberships 5226
0
0
3,500
0
3,500
Postage and Packaging 5230
1,000
0
0
0
1,000
Property Tax Administrative Fees 5231
6,000
3,900
10,000
80
19,980
Utilities 5240
0
265,000
0
0
265,000
Small Tools and Equipment 5242
0
0
6,357
0
6,357
Consulting Services 5248
0
30,000
7,000
0
37,000
Other Outside Services 5250
0
0
5,200
0
5,200
Public Notices 5256
5,700
3,300
6,000
0
15,000
Mileage 5262
0
0
200
0
200
Recognition Program 5265
0
0
2,880
0
2,880
Subtotal 5200s
$13,900
$348,700
$52,137
$80
$414,817
MuniFinancial Page 12
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
FISCAL YEAR 2004/2005 DISTRICT BUDGET
Temecula Community Services District
Operating Budget Department Summary for the Year Ending June 30, 2005
Acct.
Budget Items No.
Level B
192
Level C
193
Level D
194
Level R
195
Total
District
OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE
Waste Hauling 5315
$0
$0
$3,603,881
$0
$3,603,881
Street Lighting 5319
560,000
0
0
0
560,000
Subtotal (5300s)
$560,000
$0
$3,603,881
$0
$4,163,881
Emergency Road Maintenance 5402
$0
$0
$0
$12,080
$12,080
Landscape Maintenance 5415
0
640,000
0
0
640,000
Landscape Rehabilitation 5416
0
35,000
0
0
35,000
Subtotal(5400s)
$0
$675,000
$0
$12,080
$687,080
Capital Outlay
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Subtotal
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
TOTAL DIRECT DISTRICT COSTS
$578,859
$1,265,172
$3,694,489
$12,160
$5,550,680
EXPENDITURES/REVENUES
Reserve Collection (Contingency)
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Total Direct District Costs
578,859
1,265,172
3,694,489
12,160
5,550,680
TOTAL
EXPENDITURESIREVENUES
$578,859
$1,265,172
$3,694,489
$12,160
$5,550,680
CONTRIBUTIONS
Contributions from Other Fund
Revenue Sources
$26,200
$31,120
$37,317
$500
$95,137
Contributions from Other Revenue
Sources
0
31,316
0
0
31,316
Contributions from the General Fund
35,000
4,200
0
0
39,200
Fund Balance Contributions
35,979
0
70,044
2,501
108,524
TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS
$97,179
$66,636
$107,361
$3,001
$274,177
Balance to Le (Budgeted)
$481,680 1
$1,198,536 1
$3,587,128 1
$9,159 1
$5,276,503
MuniFinancial Page 13
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
V. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT
As in past years, the cost to provide services within the District will be fairly
distributed among each eligible property.
Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting); Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping
and Slopes); and Service Level D (Trash/Recycling):
The following is the formula used to calculate each property's District charges by
the per parcel (residential lot) method.
Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) / Total Residential Lots (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge
Service Level R (Roads):
The Charge Per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development
Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction
between developed and undeveloped parcels.
Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels
Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels
Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in rate Level) = Parcel Charge
The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL B
Property Type
Parcel/Unit
X
Charge per
Parcel
=
Parcel
Char a
Multi lier
Single Family Residential Lot
1.00
$25.68
$25.68
Per Parcel
Vacant Residential Lot
1.00
$25.68
$25.68
Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 14
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL C
Property Type and Zone
Parcel/Unit
X
Charge per
Parcel
=
Parcel
Charge
Multi tier
Residential Lot C-1
1.00
$46.00
$46.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-2
1.00
$89.00
$89.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-3
1.00
$116.00
$116.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-4
1.00
$175.00
$175.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-5
1.00
$70.00
$70.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-6
1.00
$225.00
$225.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-7
1.00
$129.00
$129.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-8
1.00
$10.00
$10.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-9
1.00
$200.00
$200.00
Per Parcel
Residential Lot C-10
1.00
$100.00
$100.00
Per Parcel
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL D
Property Type *
Parcel/Unit
X
Charge per
Parcel
=
Parcel
Charge
Multiplier
Single Family Residential Lotj
1.00
$179.86
$179.86
Per Parcel
* Developed residential parcel identified by CRBR for which refuse collections are available.
PARCEL CHARGE CALCULATIONS FOR
SERVICE LEVEL R
Property Type and Zone
Parcel/Unit
X
Charge
per Unit
=
Parcel
Charge
Multiplier
Single Family Residential Lot R-1
1.00
$115.26
$115.26
Per Parcel
Vacant Residential Lot R-1
0.50
$115.26
$57.64
Per Parcel
Single Family Residential Lot R-2
1.00
$95.86
$95.86
Per Parcel
Vacant Residential Lot R-2
0.50
$95.86
$47.94
Per Parcel
MuniFinancial Page 15
Temecula Community Services District
Engineer's Annual Levy Report
Fiscal Year 2004/2005
Appendix A — 2004/2005 COLLECTION ROLL
Parcel identification, for each lot or parcel within the District, shall be the parcel as
shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this report is prepared.
A listing of parcels within this District, along with the charges, has been submitted to
the City Clerk and, by reference, is made part of this report.
MuniFinancial Page 16
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANC
CITY MANAGERJV
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, General Manager
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
Jason Simpson, Assistant Finance irector
RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION: The proposed FY 2004-05 TCSD operating budget includes the operation and
maintenance of district -wide parks and recreation facilities, debt service on the certificates of
participation issued for the construction of the Community Recreation Center, arterial street lighting
and traffic signals, and median landscaping. Rates and charges are also established for residential
street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and emergency street and
road construction and maintenance.
On May 20, 2004, the Board of Directors/City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the
proposed operating budgets. At that time, the Board of Directors/City Council provided staff with
direction to appropriate $25,000 for a feasibility study for the development of a teen center called the
Teen Scene for options that would be attractive to young people. As a result, staff will be
recommending that unappropriated reserves in fund balance be utilized to fund this item.
Parks and recreation services, as well as arterial street lighting and traffic signals, and median
landscaping are primarily funded by the special tax assessed to property owners as approved by the
voters as "Measure C" in March 1997. The maximum level of special tax that was approved by the
voters is $74.44 per single-family dwelling unit. Over the past three years the special tax rate has
been gradually reduced to $63.44 per dwelling unit, with the $11.00 per dwelling unit difference
being funded by the City's General Fund through the Revenue Excess Sharing for Temecula
("REST") program. The proposed FY 2004-05 budget reflects no change in the existing special tax
rate.
Residential street lighting, slope maintenance, refuse collection and street sweeping, and
emergency street and road construction and maintenance services provided by the TCSD are
funded primarily by rates and charges assessed to property owners within the District. No changes
are proposed in any of the service level rates and charges.
TCSD Revenues
Overall, a $824,280 (6.6%) increase in revenues is projected for TCSD. The FY 2004-05 revenue
estimates include no change to the special tax rate, or to any of the TCSD assessment rates. The
total "REST" program revenue (from the City's General Fund) is proposed to be $3,612,000, a
$494,725 increase from FY 2003-04.
TCSD Expenditures
The proposed Community Services District budget reflects a $599,624 (4.6%) increase in total
expenditures from the current year budget. A summary of significant items is as follows:
City-wide Operations
➢ Includes full year operational & maintenance expenditures $219,300 for the Temecula
Children's Museum
➢ Include partial year funding of $90,900 for the new Community Theater being
constructed in Old Town Temecula
Service Level B
➢ $25,000 increase in street lighting costs
Service Level C
➢ $69,250 increase in landscape maintenance costs
Service Level D
➢ $206,160 increase in refuse hauling costs is reflected, per conditions of the franchise fee
agreement for refuse and recycling for a consumer price index adjustment.
➢ $22,000 increase due to tax roll adjustments on EDU counts. This change was identified
following the May 20, 2004 City Council Workshop.
TCSD Fund Balance
Surplus fund balance has been used over the past several fiscal years to fund ongoing operations
and maintenance costs. The proposed FY 2004-05 budget continues to utilize surplus fund
balance, in the following amounts:
• Citywide Operations $188,668
■ Service Level "B" $ 36,420
• Service Level "D" $ 81,509
• Service Level "R" $ 2,541
It is anticipated that the actual amount of fund balance required to be used will be less than the
amounts reflected above, based on a demonstrated pattern of actual expenditures being less than
the budgeted amounts.
FISCAL IMPACT: The services provided by the District are funded primarily by the special tax
that was approved by the voters as Measure C in March, 1997, the "REST" contribution from the
City's General Fund, and the rates and charges assessed to property owners which are to be
approved during a public hearing held on June 8, 2004.
Attachments: Resolution No. CSD 04-
FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District has
reviewed the proposed final FY 2004-05 annual operating budget and has held such public
meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 2004-05 TCSD operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the General Manager.
C. The Board of Directors must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from
the Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget
accounts.
D. The Board of Directors must authorize any increase in regular personnel
positions above the level indicated in the final budget. The General Manager
may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the
limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The General Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of
Directors action.
F. The General Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require
Board of Directors action, except that the General Manager may approve change
orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Board in amounts up to
project contingency established by the Board.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the District books at June 30, 2004 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2004-05.
Section 4. The Board Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 81h day of June 2004.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
District Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 04-_ was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Community Services District at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8'" day of June
2004, by the following vote of the Board of Directors:
AYES: BOARDMEMBERS:
NOES: BOARDMEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
District Secretary/City Clerk
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
OPERATING BUDGET
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
2003-04
2003-04
2004-05
Proposed
2002-03
YTD
Current
Proposed
Increase
Increase
Actual
@ 4/16/2004
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
(Decrease)
Total Revenues by Fund:
Citywide Operations'
6,015,603
3,598,086
6,840,935
7,796,731
955,796
14.0%
Service Level B
528,908
299,883
531,097
542,480
11,383
2.1
Service Level
1,014,574
536,837
1,049,335
1,266,052
216,717
20.7%
Service Level D
3,219,675
1,792,982
3,496,587
3,613,491
116,904
3.3%
SerNce Level R
13,234
7,839
13,054
9,659
(3,396)
-26.0%
Debt Service
554220
498,193
518,126
45,000
(473,125)
-91.3%
Total Revenues'
11,346,214
6,733,820
12,449,133
13,273,413
824,280
6.6%
Total Expenditures by Fund:
Citywide Operations'
6,255,133
4,852,263
7,264,327
7,489,100
234,773
3.2%
Service Level B
479,751
391,656
657,940
578,900
20,960
3.8%
Service Level
1,033,190
726,455
1,137,915
1,265,700
127,785
11.2%
Service Level D
3,250,668
1,750,520
3,472,109
3,695,000
222,891
6.4%
Service Level
18,281
2,873
17,160
12,200
(4,960)
-28.9%
Debt Service
580,132
497,475
498,126
496,300
(1825)
-0.4%
Total Expenditures
11,617,156
8220,242
12937,576
13,537,200
599,624
4.6%
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
(270,942)
(1,486,422)
(488,443)
(263,787)
224,656
Operating Transfers Out:
CIP Fund
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures and Operating
Transfers Out
(270,942)
(1,486,422)
(488,443)
(263,787)
224,656
Fund Balances, Beg. of Year
1,752,814
1,481,872
993,429
Fund Balances, End of Year
1,481,872
993,429
729,642
' Operating transfers between various TCSD Funds are not reflected.
Comparative information reflects amounts previously reported in separate Service Level A Fund
REVENUES BY FUND - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
Actual Actual
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03
Parks and Recreation
$ 5,380,909
$ 6,015,603
Service Level B
423,706
528,908
Service Level C
976,441
1,014,574
Service Level D
3,005,133
3,219,675
Service Level R
12,045
13,234
Debt Service*
6,511,044
-
Total
$16,309,278
$ 10,791,994
*Does not include operating
transfers from Parks and Recreation to Debt Service Fund.
FOUR-YEAR
COMPARISON
Estimated
FY 2003-04
$ 6,840,935
531,097
1,049,335
3,496,587
13,054
20,000
$ 11,951,008
Actual Actual Estimated Projected
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
■ Parks and Recreation ■ Service level B 0 Service Level C
M Service level D ■ Service Level R 0 Debt Service*
Projected
FY 2004-05
$ 7,796,731
542,480
1,266,052
3,613,491
9,659
45,000
$13,273,413
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUNDS
Fund
Parks and Recreation*
Service Level B
Service Level C
Service Level D
Service Level R
Debt Service
Total
Operations
Capital
Personnel
& Maintenance
Outlay
Total
$ 3,165,200
$ 4,303,900
$ 20,000
$ 7,489,100
5,000
573,900
578,900
242,000
1,023,700
1,265,700
38,500
3,656,500
3,695,000
12,200
12,200
496,300
496,300
$ 3,450,700
$ 10,066,500
$ 20,000
$ 13,537,200
*Parks and Recreation does not include $496,300 operating transfer to the Debt Service Fund.
RECREATION
SERVICES
Youth & Adult Sports
Special Events
Volunteer & Cultural Services
Teen & Recreational Services
Senior & Human Services
Aquatic Program Services
Contracted Classes Services
DIRECTOR OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Herman D. Parker
OF
TY SERVICES
lis Ruse
DEVELOPMENT
SERVICES
Park Acquisition
Park Development
Assessment Administration
Development Plan Review
Solid Waste Administration
Cable Television Administration
Capital Improvement Projects
Master Plan Process Review
MAINTENANCE
SERVICES
Park Maintenance
Median Maintenance
Slope Maintenance
Facility Maintenance
Landscape Maintenance
Plan Check Review
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Program: Community Services
Funding Source:
Special Tax
Benefit Assessments
General Fund
PARKS & RECREATION*
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 1,871,075
$ 2,351,286
$ 2,732,370
$ 3,165,200
Operations & Maintenance
2,636,858
3,901,989
4,521,957
4,303,900
Capital Outlay
54,696
1,858
20,000
$ 4,562,629
$ 6,255,133
$ 7,254,327
$ 7,489,100
SERVICE LEVEL B
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel $ 2,650
$ 3,856
$ 4,690
$ 5,000
Operations & Maintenance 360,664
475,896
553,250
573,900
Capital Outlay
$ 363,314 $ 479,751 $ 557,940 $ 578,900
SERVICE LEVEL C
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 99,805
$ 189,300
$ 230,165
$ 242,000
Operations & Maintenance
536,718
843,890
907,750
1,023,700
Capital Outlay
$ 636,523
$ 1,033,190
$ 1,137,915
$ 1,265,700
*Does not include operating transfers out to the Debt Service Fund.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Program: Community Services
Funding Source:
Special Tax
Benefit Assessments
General Fund
SERVICE LEVEL D
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003.04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 22,609
$ 31,529
$ 36,100
$ 38,500
Operations & Maintenance
2,565,567
3,219,140
3,429,739
3,656,500
Capital Outlay
5,487
6,270
$ 2,593,663
$ 3,250,668
$ 3,472,109
$ 3,695,000
SERVICE LEVEL R
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004.05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
$ 12,126
$ 18,281
$ 17,160
$ 12,200
Capital Outlay
$ 12,126
$ 18,281
$ 17,160
$ 12,200
DEBT SERVICE
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
$ 561,700
$ 561,700
$ 498,125
$ 496,300
Capital Outlay
Operating Transfer Out
18,432
$ 561,700
$ 580,132
$ 498,125
$ 496,300
Personnel Allocation
PARKS AND RECREATION
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Authorized Authorized
2003-04 Changes 2004-05
Director of Community Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Director of Community Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Superintendent
0.70
0.00
0.70
Development Services Administrator
0.85
0.00
0.85
Recreation Superintendent
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Services Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Supervisor
1.40
0.00
1.40
Parks/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor
0.00
0.00
0.00
Management Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Senior Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Museum Services Manager
2.00
0.00
2.00
Theater Manager
0.00
1.00
1.00
Aquatics Supervisor
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Supervisor
3.00
0.00
3.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Lead Maintenance Worker
1.50
0.00
1.50
Senior Recreation Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Landscape Inspector
1.25
0.00
1.25
Maintenance Worker
2.50
0.00
2.50
Office Specialist
2.30
0.00
2.30
Custodian
1.00
0.00
1.00
Total
25.50
1.00
26.50
SERVICE LEVEL B
Management Analyst
0.05
0.00
0.05
SERVICE LEVEL C
Maintenance Superintendent
0.05
0.00
0.05
Maintenance Supervisor
0.30
0.00
0.30
Management Analyst
0.30
0.00
0.30
Senior Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Office Specialist
0.30
0.00
0.30
Total
1.95
0.00
1.95
SERVICE LEVEL D
Development Services Administrator
0.15
0.00
0.15
Management Analyst
0.15
0.00
0.15
Office Specialist
0.10
0.00
0.10
Total
0.40
0.00
0.40
Department Total
27.90
1.00
28.90
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: RECREATION SERVICES
MISSION: The Recreation Services Program is responsible for providing a comprehensive,
Citywide recreation program that meets the recreation and human service needs within
the community.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Implemented a "Movies in the Park" summer program at various park sites
• Increase the number of free summer concerts offered
• Expanded the holiday bus tour program
• Implemented the first annual "Stepping Out for Seniors" program
• Expanded the Tiny Tot program opportunities
• Received two California Park and Recreation Society awards for the Mystery Weekend
and Best Logo as well as the Summer Sunset Film /Concert Series
GOAL 1: PROVIDE HIGH QUALITY RECREATION AND LEISURE OPPORTUNITIES
THAT MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS CREATING A STRONG SENSE OF
COMMUNITY WHILE PROMOTING PARTICIPATION IN ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Expand the holiday tours, tree lighting ceremony and Breakfast with Santa programs
➢ Implement a Letter to Santa program
➢ Provide additional programs for early -learning and parent -child interaction
➢ Expand the learn -to -swim program
➢ Sponsor at least three adult softball tournaments
➢ Offer a monthly evening out for parents while providing activities for their children
GOAL2: ENCOURAGE PARTICIPATION IN THE CULTURAL ARTS BY PROVIDING
OPPORTUNITIES FOR CREATIVITY AND SELF-EXPRESSION FOR ALL AGE
GROUPS WHILE INCREASING CULTURAL AND DIVERSITY AWARENESS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Organize a Citywide Western Days event commemorating the ranching heritage and
implement a year -long celebration focusing on the Vail Ranch Centennial
➢ Implement a video transfer and publication recovery program to preserve historical
resources
➢ Provide a summer youth camp that incorporates local history into daily camp activities
➢ Implement a multi -year plan to acquire exhibits at the City's two museums
GOAL3: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT EVALUATION TECHNIQUES OT DETERMINE
THE SUCCESS OF PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND SERVICES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Develop a survey that will gauge successful components of programs, identify areas of
improvement and solicit information to assist in meeting the needs of the community
➢ Create a checklist of observable criteria to assess attainment of specific program goals
➢ Utilize a verbal evaluation format to obtain feedback from participants and instructors
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003414
FY 2004-05
Number of holiday tour participants
168
168
252
336
Number of Breakfast with Santa participants
300
300
400
600
Number of Tiny Tot program activities
108
108
108
468
Number of swim lessons
3,000
3,000
3,000
3,750
Number of adult sports tournaments
6
6
8
10
Number of parents evening out programs
0
0
0
12
Number of specialized youth summer camps
1
2
3
3
Number of senior and City Excursions
3,900
4,500
5,200
6,750
Number of volunteer opportunities
175
190
240
290
Number of surveys utilized
2
2
2
5
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
MISSION: The Development Services Program is responsible for park site acquisition and
development, assessment engineering, development review, and solid waste and cable
television franchise administration.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Completed the design for the Wolf Creek Sports Complex
• Assisted in the completion of the 19.5 acre Harveston park site
Completed the 2004 Recycling Calendar
Completed the Children's Museum project
• Completed an internal audit of Service Level D
• Planned and implemented two successful Community Clean -Up Day events
GOAL 1: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE, BALANCED NEIGHBORHOOD COMMUNITY
PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SYSTEM THROUGHOUT THE CITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Design the Temecula Community Center Expansion
➢ Complete the Roripaugh/Johnson Ranch Trails Master Plan
➢ Coordinate the design and begin construction of the Murrieta Creek trails improvements
➢ Seek grant funding opportunities (i.e. Soccer Grant, Trails Grant, SB 332, CDBG)
GOAL 2: ADMINISTER AN EFFICIENT AND BENEFICIAL ASSESSMENT PROCESS AND
FRANCHISE SERVICES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Complete an audit of all Service Level C assessment services
➢ Administer the easement clean up of Vail Ranch and Woodside Chantemar Development
➢ If warranted, create a new base year to assist the City in obtaining its diversion rate
➢ Review all appeals/special cases for Special Tax
GOAL 3: PROVIDE THOROUGH REVIEW OF ALL PROPOSED CITY DEVELOPMENT
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Participate in the City's development review process for Specific Plans, Environmental
Impact Reports, Tentative Maps, and future park designs
➢ Provide appropriate conditions of approval for future development
➢ Review future park designs conditioned as part of the large developments
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FV 2002-03 FV 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Number of park projects completed 2 2 2 2
Number of capital projects completed 4 3 2 4
Number of large development reviewed 1 1 1 1
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
PROGRAM: MAINTENANCE SERVICES
MISSION: The Maintenance Services Program is responsible for providing effective landscape and
facility maintenance services to parks, slopes, medians, recreation facilities and City
administrative offices.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Completed numerous park, facility and slope area rehabilitation and repair projects
• Implemented energy use reduction measures at City facilities
• Rehabilitated the ornamental lighting throughout the trees at the Temecula Duck Pond
• Rehabilitated the roof systems at all City facilities
GOAL 1: PROVIDE SAFE AND ATTRACTIVE FACILITIES, PARKS, MEDIANS AND
TRAIL SYSTEMS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Ensure sites are safe, clean and green at all times
➢ Ensure performance compliance of City maintenance contractors and repair contractors
➢ Develop priorities for site repairs, renovations and rehabilitation
➢ Work closely with public safety professionals to facilitate community problem solving,
minimize vandalism and increase public safety and awareness
GOAL2: PROVIDE ATTRACTIVE AND SUSTAINABLE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
SERVICE AREAS WHICH WILL ENHANCE THE COMMUNITY'S IMAGE
WHILE PROMOTING THE PROTECTION OF OUR RESOURCES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide thorough review of all proposed maintenance service areas
➢ Encourage the design of water wise landscapes to optimize environmental resources
➢ Promote maintenance friendly landscape designs which will minimize long term
maintenance costs
➢ Identify existing landscape maintenance service areas in need of rehabilitation
➢ Initiate the rehabilitation programs in the designated landscape maintenance service areas
GOAL3: IMPLEMENT THE LATEST TECHNOLOGY AVAILABLE TO EFFECTIVELY
MANAGE THE OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS FOR CITY
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Purchase a Computerized Maintenance Management system (CMMS) to track the
inventory of custodial and maintenance supplies, work orders and preventive
maintenance items
➢ Establish effective preventative maintenance programs to improve mechanical systems
efficiency and minimize non scheduled repairs
➢ Compile and utilize information for accurate budgeting and improved operations
➢ Identify and evaluate current Energy Management systems (EMS)
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY SERVICES
GOAL 4: DEVELOP A STAND BY/CALL OUT EMERGENCY MANUAL IDENTIFYING
PARK AND FACILITY SITE PLANS AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Review and inventory each City park and facility
➢ Prepare site plans and floor plans for each park and facility showing detailed components
of each site, which will include utility shut off points
➢ Develop guidelines to address emergency situation procedures
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Number of enhancement projects completed 0 0 5 0
Number of landscape projects completed 0 0 5 0
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MAY 26, 2004
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:40
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 4 AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Roberts, Washington, and
Comerchero
ABSENT: 1 AGENCY MEMBERS: Stone
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of May 11, 2004.
2 Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the Nine Months Ended March 31,
2004.
MOTION: Agency Member Washington moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1-2.
The motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Agency Member Stone who was absent.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No comments.
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
No comments.
R: M1nutes.rda\052504
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:42 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, June 80, 2004 in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California,
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CIVIC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R: Minutes.rda%052504
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY_
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER ,
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Agency Directors
FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
Jason Simpson, Assistant Finance birector LjY�
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled: U
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
DISCUSSION:The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (RDA) consists of three funds, the
Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund, the Capital Projects Fund, and the Debt Service Fund.
RDA Revenues
Overall, a $588,644 or 6.4% increase in total RDA revenue is projected (operating transfers
excluded). Gross property tax increment revenue is projected to increase by $884,644 (8.0%). This
increase is a reflection of retail and industrial development in the project area.
RDA Expenditures
A summary of the significant items included in the proposed budget is as follows:
Low/Moderate Income Housing
➢ No significant changes
Redevelopment
➢ $150,000 is included for the fagade improvement program
➢ $455,000 is included for the ERAF shift
Debt Service
➢ A $246,000 increase is reflected in passthrough agreements as a result of increased tax
increment revenue
➢ Debt service payments are approximately $1,494,400.
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed RDA operating budget reflects a spending plan that is
balanced within projected revenues, and provides resources for various capital improvement
projects.
Attachments:
Resolution No. RDA 04-
FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
has reviewed the proposed final FY 2004-05 annual operating budget and has held such public
meetings as are necessary prior to adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula as follows:
Section 1. That the FY 2004-05 RDA operating budget is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the Executive Director.
C. The Agency Members must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The Agency Members must authorize any increase in regular personnel positions
above the level indicated in the final budget. The Executive Director may
authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary within the limits
imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The Executive Director may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Agency
Member action.
F. The Executive Director may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require
Agency Member action, except that the Executive Director may approve change
orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Agency Members in amounts
up to project contingency established by the Agency Members.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the Agency books at June 30, 2004 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2004-05.
Section 4. The Agency hereby finds and determines that the planning and administrative
expenses to be paid from the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund for each redevelopment
project are necessary for the production, improvement or preservation of low and moderate income
housing and are not disproportionate to the amounts budgeted for the costs of production,
improvement or preservation of that housing.
Section 5. The Agency Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of Temecula this 8 h day of June 2004.
Michael Naggar, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. RDA 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the
Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 8 h day of June 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS:
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS:
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
Agency Secretary/City Clerk
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
OPERATING BUDGET
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues by Fund:*
Low/Moderate Income Housing
Redevelopment
Debt Service
Total Revenues
2003-04 2003-04 2004-05 Proposed
2002-03 YTD Current Proposed Increase Increase
Actual 4/16/2004 Budget Budget (Decrease) (Decrease)
2,828,077 1,439,007 2,640,871 2,786,800 145,929 5.5%
1,388,669 2,278,459 4,950,500 1,182,100 (3,768,400) -76.1%
8,760,486 4,775,088 9,015,485 9,698,200 682,715 7.6%
12,977,231 8,492,554 16,606,856 13,667,100 (2,939,756) -17.7%
Total Non-CIP Expenditures by Fund:
Low/Moderate Income Housing
1,443,006
3,124,290
7,609,762
1,013,400
(6,596,362)
-86.7%
Redevelopment
1,008,063
1,088,817
1,323,680
1,168,200
(155,380)
-11.7%
Debt Service
8,483,214
5,661,968
8,770,296
9,055,200
284,905
3.2%
Total Expenditures
10,934,283
9,875,076
17 703,637
11,236,800
(6,466,837)
-36.5%
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures 2,042,948 (1,382,522) (1,096,781) 2,430,300 3,527,081
Other Financing Sources:
Deferred Passthrough/Interest - - -
Advances from Other Funds - - -
Excess of Revenues and Other Financing
Sources Over (Under) Expenditures 2,042,948 (1,382,522) (1,096,781) 2,430,300 3,527,081
Transfer of $1,020,100 is included between these funds
•• Excess revenues over expenditures are programmed and budgeted in the Capital Improvement Program
REVENUES BY FUND - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Actual Actual Estimated
Projected
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Low/Moderate Income
Set Aside $ 2,625,203 $ 2,828,077 $ 2,640,871
$ 2,786,800
Redevelopment* 362,287 483,589 392,000 162,000
Debt Service 36,694,733 8,760,485 9,015,485 9,698,200
Total $ 39,682,223 $ 12,072,151 $ 12,048,356 $ 12,647,000
*Does not include operating transfers from Debt Service Fund.
FOUR-YEAR COMPARISON
Actual Actual Estimated Projected
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FUNDS
Operations
Capital
Fund
Personnel
& Maintenance
Outlay Total
Low/Moderate Income Set Aside
$ 278,600
$ 734,800
$ 1,013,400
Redevelopment
110,500
1,057,700
1,168,200
Debt Service`
8,035,100
8,035,100
Total
$ 389,100
$ 9,827,600
$ - $ 10,216,700
'Debt Service does not include a $1,020,100 operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund
DIRECTOR OF
HOUSING/REDEVELOPMENT
John Meyer
HOUSING
Temecula O.N.E.
First Time Homebuyer
Residential Improvement
Programs
Land Acquisition
Affordable Housing
Project Development
Capital Projects
Old Town Specific
Plan Implementation
Community Liaison
REDEVELOPMENT
Program: Low/Moderate Income Housing Set Aside
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 167,098
$ 217,184
$ 246,685
$ 278,600
Operations & Maintenance
188,707
1,225,822
7,363,077
734,800
Capital Outlay
47
$ 355,852
$
1,443,006
$ 7,609,762
$ 1,013,400
Program: Redevelopment
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 72,419
$
91,253
$ 99,970
$ 110,500
Operations & Maintenance
702,242
916,811
1,223,610
1,057,700
Capital Outlay
47
$ 774,708
$
1,008,063
$ 1,323,580
$ 1,168,200
Program: Debt Service*
Funding Source:
Tax Increment
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002.03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
$ 7,183,343
$
7,183,343
$ 7,770,295
$ 8,035,100
Capital Outlay
Operating Transfer Out
1,299,871
1,000,000
1,020,100
$ 7,183,343
$
8,483,214
$ 8,770,295
$ 9,055,200
*Does not include operating transfer to the Redevelopment Fund.
Personnel Allocation
LOW/MOD HOUSING
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Secretary
Total
Department Total
REDEVELOPMENT
Authorized Authorized
2003-04 Changes 2004-05
0.75
0.00
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.75
0.50
0.00
0.50
2.00
0.00
2.00
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
3.00
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PROGRAM: HOUSING
MISSION: The Housing Program is responsible for encouraging private investment, removing
blight, and promoting economic revitalization in the redevelopment project area.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Completed a 17 single-family affordable housing project (Cottages in Old Town) in the
Pujolneighborhood
• Completed a 66-unit affordable senior housing project
Entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Habitat for Humanity
Inland Valleys Inc. for the development of five homes on Pujol and First Street
• Entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement with AGE. Group, LLC, to
develop, construct and operate a mixed use affordable housing and retail complex
GOAL 1: PROVIDE QUALITY HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES FOR LOW AND MODERATE
INCOME FAMILIES AND TO EXPAND THEIR AVAILABILITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Ensure compliance with State Redevelopment Law
➢ Monitor existing affordable housing covenants
➢ Administer the First Time Homebuyer, Employee Relocation Programs and Residential
Improvement Program
➢ Acquire land and develop projects to support new affordable housing opportunities
➢ Encourage private investment in the expansion of affordable housing
➢ Partner with non-profit and for -profit developers to construct affordable family and
senior housing
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of additional affordable housing
units provided
Number of affordable housing units
rehabilitated
Number of first time homebuyers assisted
Number of employee relocation homebuyers
assisted
Number of specialized homebuyer programs
Projected
FY 2002-03
Actual
FY 2002-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-05
17
0
66
30
55
44
55
50
4
0
2
10
4
0
2
2
4
0
4
4
DEPARTMENT: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
PROGRAM: REDEVELOPMENT
MISSION: The Redevelopment Program is responsible for encouraging private investment,
removing blight, and promoting economic revitalization in the redevelopment project
area.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Continued implementation of the Old Town Improvement Program
• Funded 22 facade improvement projects
Completed design development and construction drawings for the Old Town Community
Theater
• Completed the retrofit of the Mercantile Building for the Old Town Community Theater
• Entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement with Old Town Dining, LLC
Baily's Restaurant in Old Town Temecula
• Funded the rancho California Bridge widening
GOAL 1: IMPLEMENT THE OLD TOWN SPECIFIC PLAN
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Work with Old Town merchants, property owners, civic groups and the development
community to make private and public improvements in Old Town, develop projects that
will revitalize Old Town economy, and assist in the private rehabilitation of buildings in
Old Town
➢ Promote and encourage participation in the Facade Improvement Program
➢ Recruit new businesses to open in Old Town
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03
Number of facade improvement projects
completed 20
Actual Projected Projected
FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
15 9
Number of historical structures assisted 0 1 0
Number of redevelopment projects negotiated
and completed 0 2 0
20
ITEM 3
APPROVAL y
CITY ATTORNEY WP
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Agency Directors
FROM: Shawn D. Nelson, Executive Director
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2005-09 Capital Improvement Budget for the
Redevelopment Agency (RDA)
PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2005-09 AND ADOPTING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2004-05
DISCUSSION: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the Citys plan for providing public
improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring. The
proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling
of all capital improvement projects over the next five years.
On May20, 2004 the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the draft CIP. A
presentation was provided to the City Council on an overview of the Capital Improvement Program.
City Councilmembers and staff discussed in detail several projects within the CIP.
COSTS
The total Redevelopment Agency cost as identified in the CIP is $21,121,413 which includes eight
(8) RDA projects and four (4) RDA Housing Projects. A total cost of $12,021,260 is programmed in
FY 2004-05 CIP.
REVENUE
Projected revenue from the RDA and RDA Housing sources for the Five Year RDA Capital
Improvement Program is $22,526,269. Through the five year program, there is adequate funding for
all proposed projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2005-09 Five Year Capital Improvement Program
establishes the project appropriations for FY 2004-05. Projects which do not have sufficient funds
within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured.
Attachments:
Resolution No. RDA 2004-
FY 2005-09 Capital Improvement Program
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2005-09 AND ADOPTING
THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2004-05
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula
has reviewed the proposed FY 2005-09 Capital Improvement Program and has held such public
meetings as are necessary prior to adopting the Capital Improvement Budget for FY 2004-05.
WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to
best serve the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, Capital
Improvement Program is necessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2005-09 is hereby approved. A copy
of the FY 2005-09 Program is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and will be kept on file in the office of
the City Clerk.
Section 2. Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State
Guidelines for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for
possible future actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does
not require preparation of an E IR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of
environmental factors. In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City
Council has considered relevant environmental factors. This City Council, as the lead agency for
environmental review pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines
promulgated thereunder (collectively "CEQA") has reviewed the scope and nature of this Capital
Improvement Program and has concluded that the planning and prioritization process comprising
this activity is not a project pursuant to CEQA because it does not order or authorize the
commencement of any physical or other activity that would, directly or indirectly, have a significant
effect upon the environment. The Capital Improvement Program merely establishes a listing of
priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary planning studies, including
review p ursuant t o C EQA, a t a f uture, u nspecified d ate. T he f uture p lanning s tudies will be
conducted at the earliest possible time, so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to CEQA.
Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City
of Temecula, and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as
regards CEQA, this City Council has also considered this Capital Improvement Program as if it were
a Project pursuant to CEQA. Reviewing this Program as a Project, this City Council concludes that
the Project would be exempt from review under CEQA both pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and
pursuant to the categorical exemption set forth in Section 15262 of CEQA. Section 15061(b)(3)
would apply because it can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program,
cannot and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No
physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical
improvements prioritized in the Program are undertaken. Section 15262 provides a categorical
exemption to actions that are feasibility or planning studies related to possible future actions. This
Council is aware of and has considered the current and relevant environmental factors as an
integral component of the review of this Program. This Council, as lead agency, hereby determines
and decides that the exemption provided by both Section 15061(b)(3) and 15262 apply in the event
this is deemed a Project pursuant to CEQA.
Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2005-09" included herein
appropriations for FY 2004-05 is hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the 2002-2003 Fiscal
Year which have not been completed, encumbered nor included in the FY 2005-2009 CIP are
hereby carried over for each applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2004-2005.
Section 4. On June 2, 2004 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement
Program consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c)
of State Planning and Zoning Law.
Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of
budget appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to
$25,000. Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires Board of Directors action.
C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency
contracts in amounts up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available.
D. That the City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between
approved Capital Improvement Program projects.
E. Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal
Code, the City Manager may authorize Redevelopment Agency contracts in
amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Redevelopment Agency funds
in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City
Manager may approve change orders on Redevelopment Agency contracts
approved by the Board of Directors in amounts up to project contingency
established by Board of Directors.
Section 6. Councilmember Stone abstains with respect to projects within the Old
Town area due to property ownership in Old Town Temecula.
Section 7. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this
resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting held on the 8`h day of June 2004.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution
No. 2004- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the City of Temecula at a
regular meeting thereof held on the 8th day of June, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 18
CITY ATTORNEY
FINANCE DIREC-
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: June 8, 2004 '
SUBJECT: Art In Public Places Ordinance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1) Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled:
ORDINANCE NO. 04-
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 6.08 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
BACKGROUND: In 1998 the City of Temecula developed a Cultural Arts Master Plan. The intent of
developing the Cultural Arts Master Plan was to develop a plan that identified key goals to enhance and
encourage the development of culture and arts in our community. Through a series of workshops,
interviews and focus groups, six (6) goals were identified and established by the community. One of
these goals was to enhance the community through arts in public places. This goal encouraged the
establishment of a public arts ordinance and fee. Over the years, the City has contributed to Art in Public
Places. These investments in Public Art are evidenced by the development of the Veteran's War
Memorial and installation of the sculpture "Singing In The Rain", currently installed at the Temecula Duck
Pond. In addition, three (3) specific plans, Roripaugh, Wolf Creek and Harveston, have all been
conditioned in the Development Agreement to provide a Public Art fee.
The proposed Art in Public Places Ordinance is designed to encourage new development to design,
develop and install artwork in public spaces for the community to enjoy. It requires new development to
install public art, or pay an in -lieu fee for public art if the installation of public art is not feasible. The
artwork or in -lieu fee should have a value equal to 10% of 1% of the building value in excess of
$100,000. This would apply to residential development, multi -family development and commercial or
non-residential development. If artwork installed has a lesser value than the calculated in -lieu fee, the
remaining value would have to be paid by fees.
An example of the public art fee calculations:
Building Value $180,000
Excess of $100,000 80,000
1% 800
10% of 1 % 80
Public Art Fee $ 80
R:0GLERMPEPORM60804 CC public an ordinance.doc
Building Value $3,800,000
Excess of $100,000 3,700,000
1% 37,000
10% of 1% 3,700
Public Art Fee $ 3,700
The ordinance establishes an Art In Public Places fund, and in -lieu fees would be deposited into this
fund. The funds could be used for the design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance and
insurance of public artwork or displays on City property. It could also be used to offer performing arts
programs on City property for the community. In addition, the funds could be used for art education
programs on City property within the community.
With regards to the process, the developer would forward an application for donation of public artwork to
the City, or installation of artwork on private property, to the Community Services Department. The
application would include preliminary sketches, photographs, models and significant design features to
clarify and indicate the nature of the proposed artwork. Evidence of the value of the artwork must also
be submitted with the application along with a resume from the creator of the proposed artwork. The
application would be reviewed initially by the Community Services Department, which would make a
recommendation thereon. If the application is for donation, then the Community Services Commission
shall review the proposed artwork and act as an advisory body to the City Council who will make the final
decision for donation. If the application is for installation on private property, the Community Services
Commission shall review the application and be the final decision maker on the installation of the
artwork. Public artwork installed on private property shall be maintained by the property owner. The City
would be responsible for the maintenance and upkeep of artwork donated to the City and installed on
City property.
The intent of the public art ordinance and fee is to encourage development to provide public art in public
spaces that our community can enjoy. Through the Cultural Arts Master Plan development process it
was apparent that the community felt that public art enhances community aesthetics and cultivates a
sense of community pride.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Public Art Fund will receive ongoing funding from residential fill-in
development and non-residential development. The three major specific plans; Roripaugh, Wolf Creek
and Harveston, have established Development Agreements that require a public art fee for each building
permit. Some of these specific plans have already committed to providing public art in their
development, rather than paying the in -lieu fee.
ATTACHMENTS: Public Art Ordinance
RAZIGLERG\REPOR71060804 CC public art ordinance.doc
N
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADDING CHAPTER 5.08 TO THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Purpose and Findings. The City Council finds, determines
and declares that:
A. Public artwork enhances the quality of life for individuals
living in, working in and visiting Temecula.
B. As development and re -development of real property within
Temecula continues, urbanization of the community results and the opportunity
for creation of public artwork is diminished.
C. The California Supreme Court has ruled that municipalities
can require developers either to include public artwork in their development
projects or to pay an in lieu fee. Ehrlich v. City of Culver City, 12 Cal. 854 (1996).
D. Establishment of the Art in Public Places Program set forth
in this Ordinance will promote the general welfare by ensuring that public artwork
is generated in conjunction with private development projects that contribute to
urbanization of the community.
Section 2. Chapter 5.08, Art in Public Places, is hereby added to the
Temecula Municipal Code to read as follows:
"Chapter 5.08
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
5.08.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to enhance the quality of life for city
residents, workers and visitors by providing for the acquisition and maintenance
of public artwork.
5.08.020 Implementation of chapter.
A. The procedures prescribed by this chapter for review and approval
of public artwork shall be conducted concurrently with any applicable procedures
RAZIGLERGV(AGREEMMord re_ art in public places.DOC- 1 of 7 -
prescribed by Title 17 of this code for review and approval of development
permits.
B. The community services department shall establish guidelines that
specify maintenance requirements for public artwork installed on private property
to satisfy the public artwork requirement.
5.08.030 Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter, the following words and phrases shall
have the following meanings:
"Appropriately maintained" means maintained in conformance with the
city's public artwork guidelines.
"Artwork" means an original creation of physical art including without
limitation a fountain, mobile, mosaic, mural, painting, sculpture and tapestry. An
artwork may be realized through such mediums as bronze, ceramic tile, concrete
stained glass, steel or wood. An artwork may be an integral part of a building or
public space, whether attached to, interior of or external to the building.
"Development project" means construction or modification of a building.
"In lieu art fee" means a fee in the amount of one -tenth of one percent of
the project cost in excess of one hundred thousand dollars.
"Project cost" means the total value of a development project, excluding
the land value, as indicated on the building permit issued by the city for the
project.
"Public artwork" means an artwork that is either (i) donated to the city for
installation on city property; or (ii) installed on private property in a publicly
accessible location.
"Public artwork requirement" means the requirement, imposed by this
chapter, of providing a public artwork or paying the in lieu art fee.
"Publicly accessible" means accessible to the public for viewing, in a direct
line of sight, for a minimum period of ten hours per day, seven days per week.
"Value of a public artwork" means the cost of designing, acquiring,
constructing and installing an artwork, as applicable.
5.08.040 Art in Public Places Fund.
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMN\ord re_ art in public places.DOC- 2 Of 7 -
A. There is hereby established in the city a fund known as the "Art in
Public Places Fund," which shall be a depository for fees paid pursuant to this
chapter and for public art -related monetary donations to the city.
B. The Art in Public Places Fund shall be maintained by the finance
director and shall be utilized for the following purposes:
1. Administration of this chapter.
2. Design, acquisition, installation, improvement, maintenance
and insurance of public artwork displayed on city property.
3. Offering of performing arts programs on city property for the
community.
4. Art education programs on city property for the community;
provided, however, that not more than five percent of the fund's annual budget
shall be used for this purpose.
5.08.050 Applicability of public artwork requirement.
A. Except as provided in paragraph B below, the public artwork
requirement shall apply to the following development projects:
1. Single-family residential unit on a lot within an approved
subdivision and having a project cost in excess of one hundred thousand dollars
($100,000).
2. Multi -family residential units having a project cost in excess
of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) per unit.
3. Commercial, industrial, office and other non-residential units
in excess of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000).
B. The following development projects shall be exempt from the public
artwork requirement:
1. Government agency development projects.
2. Reconstruction of structures that have been damaged by
fire, flood, wind, earthquake or other calamity.
5.08.060 Satisfaction of public artwork requirement.
A. The public art requirement shall be satisfied by completing one of
the following actions in accordance with this chapter:
RAZIGLERGV(AGREEWord re_ art in public places.DOC- 3 Of 7 -
1. Donating a public artwork to the city.
2. Installing a public artwork on private property.
3. Paying an in lieu art fee.
B. If the value of a public artwork used to satisfy the public artwork
requirement is less than the amount of the in lieu art fee that otherwise would be
applicable to the development project, then the difference shall be paid to the city
and deposited in the Art in Public Places Fund.
5.08.070 Procedure for donation or installation of public artwork.
A. An application for donation of a public artwork to the city, or for
installation of a public artwork on private property, shall be filed with the
community services department prior to the issuance of grading or building
permits for a development project. The application shall include:
1. Preliminary sketches, photographs, models or other
documentation of sufficient descriptive clarity to indicate the nature of the
proposed artwork.
iF1"15+Ie INI
2. An appraisal or other evidence of the value of the proposed
3. The resume of the creator of the proposed artwork.
4. If the application is for donation, then the application shall
also include the following:
a. A city attorney -approved written statement executed
by the artwork's creator waiving such person's rights under the Visual Artists
Rights Act of 1990 (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.), California Civil Code Section 1542
and equivalent laws.
5. If the application is for installation, then the application shall
also include the following:
a. Preliminary plans of sufficient descriptive clarity to
indicate the compatibility of the proposed public artwork with the development
project, adjacent parcels and the surrounding neighborhood.
b. A written statement explaining how the proposed
artwork will be publicly accessible.
R:0GLERG\XAGREEMN\ord re_ art in public places.DOC- 4 Of 7 -
C
6. Any other information requested by the community services
department to enable reasonable evaluation of the application.
B. Each application shall be reviewed initially by the community
services department, which shall make a recommendation thereon. If the
application is for donation, then the community services commission shall be an
advisory body and the city council shall be the decisionmaker. The city council's
decision on an application for donation shall be final. If the application is for
installation, then the community services commission shall be the decisionmaker
and its decision shall be final unless appealed to the city council in accordance
with Chapter 2.36 of this code.
C. Prior to installing a public artwork on private property to satisfy the
public artwork requirement, the property owner shall execute and record with the
county recorder a city attorney -approved covenant. Such covenant shall require
the property owner and successors thereof to do the following:
1. Maintain the public artwork in good condition.
2. Allow city representatives to enter upon the property upon
reasonable written notice to perform necessary repairs to the public artwork at
the property owner's expense when it is not maintained in good condition.
3. Indemnify, defend and hold harmless the city, its officers,
employees and agents from any claim, demand, damage, liability, loss, cost or
expense attributable to the public artwork.
6.08.080 Procedure for payment of in lieu art fee.
Payment of the in lieu art fee shall be made prior to the issuance of
grading or building permits unless an alternative deadline is approved by the city
council.
5.08.090 Maintenance of public artwork on private property.
Public artwork installed on private property to satisfy the public artwork
requirement shall be appropriately maintained and insured by the property
owner. The insurance shall be in an amount determined by the city manager and
shall provide coverage in the event of fire damage to or vandalism of the public
work.
5.08.100 Removal or alteration of public artwork on private property.
Artwork installed on private property to satisfy the public artwork
requirement shall not be removed or altered without the prior approval of the city
council. In addition to any other applicable penalty, violation of this section may
R:\ZIGLERG\XAGREEMN\ord re_ art in public places.DOc- 5 Of 7 -
render the property owner liable for payment of the in lieu art fee that would have
been applicable to the development project, and may result in revocation of the
occupancy permit issued for the development project. Prior to any imposition of
in lieu art fee liability or occupancy permit revocation pursuant to this section, the
city shall afford the property owner notice and an opportunity for a hearing."
Section 2. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not
affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Ordinance. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance and each sentence,
clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sentences,
clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or otherwise invalid.
Section 3. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary
thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law.
R:\ZIGIERG\XAGREEMN\ord re_ art in public places.Doc- 6 of 7 -
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this _ day of ,
2004.
Michael S. Naggar
Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby
certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 04-_ was duly introduced and placed
upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
2004, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted
and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the day of
2004 by the following vote:
AYES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson
City Attorney
RAZIGLERGWAGREEMMord re_ art in public places.DOc- 7 Of 7 -
ITEM 19
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget
PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
Jason Simpson, Assistant Finance Pirector
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING
BUDGET AND ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN
APPROPRIATIONS
2. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.04-.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED
POSITIONS
Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR
FY 2004-05
DISCUSSION: Attached is the proposed FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget. The
budget includes revenue projections and expenditure requests for the General Fund, Gas Tax Fund,
State Transportation Fund, Law Enforcement Grant Fund, Internal Service Funds and Community
Development Block Grant Fund.
The City of Temecula remains in a healthy financial condition. Based upon the Finance
Department's revised estimate of revenues and expenditures for the current fiscal year, it appears
that most revenue estimates will be met or exceeded, and that actual expenditures will be less than
the budgeted appropriation amounts for an estimated total savings of $1,000,000.
On May 20, 2004, the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the proposed operating
budgets. At that time, the City Council designated $2.5 million for state budget impacts. No other
adjustments were recommended to the General Fund Operating Budget.
Current Condition -State of California May Revision Budget
The Governor's May Revision package includes a temporary two-year local government reduction of
$1.3 billion statewide annually. The package also comes with the Governor's promise to support a
constitutional amendment that would guarantee revenue stability and mandate reform for local
governments.
The City's proposed share of the statewide reduction is estimated at $978,712 for FY 2004-05 and
an additional $978,712 for FY 2005-06, totaling $1,957,424. Also included is a proposed VLF Gap
repayment in FY 2006-07 of $1.3million. The City has $2.5 million reserved for State Budget
impacts that will cover this anticipated reduction. City staff will continue to monitor the status of the
State's Budget for further potential impacts.
General Fund Revenues
The projected General Fund revenues are $49.1 million for FY 2004-05 which reflects a $4,947,572
or 11.2% increase from the FY 2003-04 revenue estimates. Increases in fee revenues reflect the
new proposed User Fee structure. Some of the significant revenue increases are summarized
below:
➢ $1,565,740 increase in Motor Vehicle In -Lieu Revenue (State backfill restored)
➢ $920,600 increase in Sales Tax (to $24,820,600)
➢ $496,000 increase in Plan Check and Inspection for Fire Department
➢ $378,350 increase in Plan Check fees
➢ $300,000 increase in Building & Safety revenues
➢ $317,860 increase in Property Taxes
➢ $200,073 increase in Land Development Fees
➢ $147,460 increase in Transient Occupancy Tax
➢ $78,000 increase in Franchise Fees
General Fund Expenditures
The proposed budget of $47.2 million reflects an increase in General Fund expenditures of
$3,114,464 or 7.1 % from the FY 2003-04 budget. The primary increases affecting the General Fund
include: 1) Police contract costs due to the addition of four sworn positions, 2) Fire Department
costs due to conversion to paramedic engines and contract costs and 3) an increase in the "REST"
contribution.
2
Personnel costs increases that impact the budget include: 1) the enhanced retirement benefit of
2.5% @ 55 for all regular authorized positions, 2) the increase of $25.00 in the benefit allowance to
$775 per month effective January 1, 2005 for all regular authorized positions per the City's labor
agreement, and 3) a cost of living increase of three percent.
Six new positions are proposed to be added to the schedule of authorized positions. The total net
annual cost of these positions is approximately $275,712.
Department
Position
Fire
Office Specialist
Public Works
Office Assistant
Police
Management Analyst
TCSD
Theater Manager
Building & Safety
Building Inspector II
Information Systems
System Engineer
Three position reclassifications are proposed, at a total annual incremental cost of $20,478 for the
position upgrades. The personnel schedule also includes a change in job title from Administrative
Secretary to Administrative Assistant and no additional cost to the City with this change. A summary
of the proposed position upgrades is as follows:
Deptartment Proposed Position Current Position
Fire Administrative Assistant Office Specialist
City Clerk Senior Records Coordinator Records Coordinator
Building & Safety Building Inspector III Building Inspector II
The proposed budget continues the City's practice of relying on project or temporary help to meet
short-term needs. Included in the proposed budget is approximately $722,840 in project and
temporary help costs, which represents 5.51% of the City's total General Fund personnel cost
budget. Following is a summary of the significant items by department in the FY 2004-05 proposed
budget:
City Manager
➢ Includes $36,000 funding for a federal lobbyist
➢ Includes $42,000 funding for a state lobbyist
City Clerk
➢ Includes $65,000 funding for an election as a result of City Council vacancy
Finance
➢ Reflects a significant reduction in consulting services due to the prior year contracts for
GASB 34 implementation and the user fee study
Planning/Code Enforcement
➢ Reflects an increase due to the addition of a Code Enforcement Officer on a Temporary
basis
Fire
➢ $544,440 increase in Fire Services contract costs due implementation of a labor
agreement and conversion to Paramedic engines (being phased in over a two-year
period)
Police
➢ The following modifications are proposed to sworn staffing levels, exceeding the City's
ratio of one sworn officer per thousand residents:
• Addition of two patrol officers
• Addition of one school resource officer
• Addition of one special teams officer
➢ The City's ratio of one sworn officer per thousand residents will be exceeded by 4.5
officers
➢ Includes continued funding to support the Community Action Patrol ("CAP") program
which would utilize citizen volunteers to perform certain functions
➢ Includes $101,500 in support costs for various special events
Non -Departmental
➢ The "REST" program contribution to TCSD is proposed to be increased from $3,117,275
to $3,612,000
Operating Transfers Out
➢ A $3,730,816 transfer to the Capital Improvement Program is proposed
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Following is a discussion of significant items in the proposed Internal Service Fund budgets:
Insurance
➢ Includes increase in $26,000 for property insurance premium cost increases
Vehicles
➢ Three replacement and four new additional vehicle purchases are proposed as follows:
Replacement:
• Building & Safety: two (2) new sedans for pool vehicle, projected cost
$30,000
• TCSD: (1) One -ton Cargo/Utility Van, projected cost $60,000
New:
• Building & Safety: two (2) mid -size 4,400 to 5,900 GVWR Pickup Trucks
• Fire: one (1) new midsize truck for an Inspector, projected cost $28,000
• Public Works: one (1) passenger sedan for field staff
Information Systems
➢ Since the May 20, 2004 City Council Workshop, staff has determined that an additional
$25,000 for Compensated Absences is necessary to account for employee leave costs
based upon historical levels. This amount will be absorbed within the Internal Service
Fund and will not affect the charges to other funds, primarily the General Fund.
Support Services
➢ No significant changes
Facilities
➢ No significant changes
EI
"Gann" Appropriations Limit
In accordance with Government Code Section 7910, the City Council is required on an annual basis
to adopt by resolution the "Gann" Appropriations Limit. The Appropriations Limit creates a restriction
on the amount of revenue that can be appropriated in any fiscal year. The Limit is increased each
year based on the growth of population, inflation, and non-residential assessed valuation.
Using population data provided by the State Department of Finance, and assessed valuation
information provided by the City's property tax consultant HdL, Coren & Cone, the City's
Appropriations Limit for FY 2004-05 has been computed to be $62,903,756. Appropriations subject
to the limit in the proposed FY 2004-05 budget total of $33,580,295, which is $29,323,461 less than
the computed limit. Additional appropriations to the budget funded by non -tax sources such as
service charges, restricted revenues from other agencies, grants, or beginning fund balances would
be unaffected by the Appropriations Limit, however, any supplemental appropriations funded
through increased tax sources could not exceed the $29,323,461 variance indicated above.
Further, any overall actual receipts from tax sources greater than $29,323,461 from the budget
estimates will result in proceeds from taxes in excess of the City's Appropriations Limit, requiring
refunds of the excess within the next two fiscal years, or voter approval to increase the City's
Appropriations Limit.
FISCAL IMPACT: Due to anticipated additional revenues to be received and expenditure
savings in the current fiscal year, it is estimated that the June 30, 2004 fund balance will be
approximately $1,000,000 higher than originally expected. The proposed FY 2004-05 General Fund
operating budget is a balanced budget that provides for an excess of General Fund revenues over
operating expenditures of $1,953,670 (before operating transfers), and provides $3.7 million to be
transferred to the Capital Improvement Program. The proposed budget provides for a $10 million
designation for economic uncertainties, maintains existing funds for open space acquisition,
additionally designates funds for retiree health benefits, and $2.5 million for State budget impacts as
of June 30, 2005.
Attachments
-Resolution No. 04-
-Resolution No. 04-
-Resolution No. 04-
-FY 2004-05 Proposed Annual Operating Budget
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ADOPTING THE FY 2004-05 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET AND
ESTABLISHING CONTROLS ON CHANGES IN APPROPRIATIONS
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Temecula has reviewed the proposed final FY
2004-05 annual operating budget and has held such public meetings as are necessary prior to
adoption of the final operating budget.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of
Temecula entitled "City of Temecula FY 2004-05 Annual Operating Budget" is hereby adopted.
Section 2. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The Department Director may prepare a transfer of appropriations within
departmental budget accounts, with the approval of the City Manager.
C. The City Council must authorize transfers (appropriations) of funds from the
Unreserved Fund Balance and transfers between departmental budget accounts.
D. The City Council must authorize any changes to the Schedule of Authorized
Positions. The City Manager may authorize the hiring of temporary or part time staff as necessary
within the limits imposed by the controls listed above.
E. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000.
Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
F. Pursuant to Section 3.32.050 of the Municipal Code, the City Manager may
authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any expenditures of Public Works
funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action, except that the City Manager may approve
change orders on Public Works contracts approved by the Council in amounts up to project
contingency established by Council.
Section 3. Outstanding encumbrances shown on the City books at June 30, 2004 are
hereby appropriated for such contracts or obligations for FY 2004-05.
Section 4. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 8t"
day of June 2004.
Michael Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 04-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting thereof held on the 8t' day of June, 2004, by the following vote of the City Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
7
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority under Chapter 2.12.030 of the City's Municipal Code,
the City Manager has the authority to hire, set salaries and adopt personnel policies: and,
WHEREAS, the City Manager has recommended and the City Council now wishes to adopt
the Revised Schedule of Authorized Positions;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. The attached Schedule of Authorized Positions (Exhibit A) is hereby adopted
pursuant to Section 45001 of the California Government Code. Such list is attached to this
Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference.
Section 2. The Schedule of Authorized Positions shall become effective July 1, 2004, and
may be thereafter amended.
Section 3. The City Manager shall implement the attached Schedule of Authorized
Positions and has the authority to select and appoint employees in accordance with the City's
personnel policies.
Section 4. All prior resolutions and parts of this resolution in conflict with this Resolution are
hereby rescinded.
Section 5. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 8" day of June 2004.
Michael Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 8t" day of June 2004, by the following vote of the City
Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
FY 04/05
Authorized
Count
Buildinta & Safet
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
BUILDING INSPECTOR II
7.00
BUILDING INSPECTOR III
1.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TECH
4.00
DEPUTY BUILDING OFFICIAL
1.00
DIRECTOR, BUILDING & SAFETY
1.00
OFFICE ASSISTANT
2.00
OFFICE SPECIALIST
1.00
PLAN CHECKERBLDG INSPECTOR
1.00
SENIOR BUILDING INSPECTOR
1.00
Building & Safety
Subtotals: 20.00
City Clerk
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
CENTRAL SERVICES COORDINATOR
1.00
CITY CLERK/DIR OF SUPPORT SERV
1.00
DEPUTY DIR OF SUPPORT SERVICES
1.00
MINUTE CLERK
1.00
OFFICE ASSISTANT
0.50
OFFICE SPECIALIST
2.00
SR. RECORDS COORDINATOR
1.00
City Clerk
Subtotals: 8.50
City Council
COUNCILMEMBER 5.00
City Council Subtotals: 5.00
City ManagerWuntan Resources
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER
ASST TO CITY MNGR/HR DIRECTOR
CITY MANAGER
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
HUMAN RESOURCES ANALYST
HUMAN RESOURCES SPECIALIST
MARKETING COORDINATOR
SENIOR MANAGEMENT ANALYST
City ManagerUluman Resources
Subtotals:
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
9.00
Exempt/
Minimum Maximum NonExempt
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
$ 3,641
$ 4,661
NE
$ 3,941
$ 5,045
NE
$ 3,010
$ 3,854
NE
$ 5,475
$ 7,009
E
$ 6,845
$ 8,761
E
$ 2,020
$ 2,585
NE
$ 2,178
$ 2,788
NE
$ 3,941
$ 5,045
NE
$ 4,344
$ 5,559
E
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
$ 2,478
$ 3,171
NE
$ 6,845
$ 8,761
E
$ 5,263
$ 6,739
E
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
$ 2,020
$ 2,585
NE
$ 2,178
$ 2,788
NE
$ 3,047
$ 3,900
NE
$ 0 $ 860 NE
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
$ 9,260
$ 11,853
E
$ 6,845
$ 8,761
E
$ 0
$ 13,203
E
$ 3,816
$ 4,885
E
$ 4,199
$ 5,375
E
$ 3,414
$ 4,370
E
$ 4,619
$ 5,913
E
$ 5,102
$ 6,531
E
Exhibit A
Final
City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
FY 04/05
Exhibit A
Final
Authorized Exempt/
Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt
Community Services
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
AQUATICS SUPERVISOR
1.00
$ 3,579
$ 4,581
NE
CUSTODIAN
2.00
$ 2,162
$ 2,768
NE
DEPUTY DIR. OF COMMUNITY SVCS
1.00
$ 6,549
$ 8,382
E
DEVELOPMENT SVCS ADMINISTRATOR
1.00
$ 5,509
$ 7,052
E
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
1.00
$ 8,174
$ 10,463
E
FACILITY MAINTENANCE COORD.
1.00
$ 2,984
$ 3,818
NE
LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
2.00
$ 3,067
$ 3,924
NE
LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER
2.00
$ 3,027
$ 3,873
NE
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
1.00
$ 4,237
$ 5,423
E
MAINTENANCE SUPT. - TCSD
1.00
$ 5,206
$ 6,663
E
MAINTENANCE WORKER
3.00
$ 2,571
$ 3,291
NE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
1.00
$ 4,619
$ 5,913
E
MUSEUM SERVICES MANAGER
2.00
$ 3,679
$ 4,711
NE
OFFICE SPECIALIST
3.00
$ 2,178
$ 2,788
NE
PARK/LANDSCAPE MAINT SUPV
1.00
$ 4,237
$ 5,423
E
RECREATION COORDINATOR
1.00
$ 2,923
$ 3,741
NE
RECREATION SERVICES MANAGER
1.00
$ 4,671
$ 5,978
E
RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT
1.00
$ 5,494
$ 7,034
E
RECREATION SUPERVISOR
3.00
$ 3,579
$ 4,581
NE
SENIOR LANDSCAPE INSPECTOR
1.00
$ 3,525
$ 4,512
NE
SENIOR RECREATION COORDINATOR
1.00
$ 3,216
$ 4,115
NE
THEATRE MANAGER
1.00
$ 4,437
$ 5,680
E
Community Services
Subtotals: 33.00
Finance
ACCOUNTANT
1.00
$ 3,717
$ 4,759
NE
ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT
2.00
$ 2,404
$ 3,077
NE
ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
2.00
$ 2,781
$ 3,558
NE
ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST -PAYROLL
1.00
$ 2,781
$ 3,558
NE
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
1.00
$ 6,490
$ 8,309
E
BUSINESS LICENSE SPEC/CASHIER
1.00
$ 2.485
$ 3,182
NE
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
1.00
$ 8,174
$ 10,463
E
FISCAL SERVICES MANAGER
1.00
$ 5,699
$ 7,295
E
PURCHASING COORDINATOR
1.00
$ 2,781
$ 3,558
NE
REVENUE MANAGER
1.00
$ 5,102
$ 6,531
E
SENIOR ACCOUNTANT
1.00
$ 4,745
$ 6,074
E
SENIOR DEBT ANALYST
0.50
$ 5,102
$ 6,531
E
Finance Subtotals: 14.50
Fire 1.00 $ 2,888 $ 3,697 NE
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
OFFICE SPECIALIST 1.00 $ 2,178 $ 2,788 NE
Fire Subtotals: 2.00
City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
FY 04/05
Exhibit A
Final
Authorized Exempt/
Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt
Information Systems
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
DIRECTOR OF INFORMATION SYSTEM
1.00
$ 6,845
$ 8,761
E
GIS ADMINISTRATOR
1.00
$ 4,717
$ 6,037
E
GIS ANALYST
1.00
$ 3,592
$ 4,598
NE
I.S. ADMINISTRATOR
2.00
$ 4,717
$ 6,037
E
INFORMATION SYSTEMS SPECIALIST
1.00
$ 3,864
$ 4,946
E
SR. I.S. SPECIALIST
1.00
$ 4,237
$ 5,423
E
WEBMASTER
1.00
$ 3,592
$ 4,598
NE
Information Systems
Subtotals: 9.00
Planning
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
ASSISTANT PLANNER
1.00
$ 3,737
$ 4,784
NE
ASSOCIATE PLANNER
6.00
$ 4,238
$ 5,424
NE
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
2.00
$ 3,489
$ 4,466
NE
CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER II
1.00
$ 3,839
$ 4,913
NE
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER
1.00
$ 9,163
$ 11,729
E
DEVELOPMENT PROC. COORDINATOR
1.00
$ 3,840
$ 4,915
NE
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
1.00
$ 7,581
$ 9,704
E
OFFICE ASSISTANT
2.00
$ 2,020
$ 2,585
NE
OFFICE SPECIALIST
2.00
$ 2,178
$ 2,788
NE
PRINCIPAL PLANNER
3.00
$ 6,154
$ 7,878
E
SENIOR PLANNER
1.00
$ 5,353
$ 6,852
E
Planning Subtotals: 22.00
Police
MANAGEMENT ANALYST 1.00 $ 4,619 $ 5,913 E
Police Subtotals: 1.00
City of Temecula SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
FY 04/05
Exhibit A
Final
Authorized Exempt/
Count Minimum Maximum NonExempt
Public Works
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
ASSISTANT ENGINEER
7.00
$ 4,177
$ 5,349
NE
ASSOCIATE ENGINEER
8.00
$ 4,912
$ 6,287
E
CIP SPECIALIST
0.75
$ 3,317
$ 4,246
NE
CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
1.00
$ 4,999
$ 6,616
E
DEPUTY DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS
1.00
$ 7,329
$ 9,381
E
DIR OF PUB WORKS/CITY ENG
1.00
$ 9,163
$ 11,729
E
ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN
1.00
$ 2,822
$ 3,613
NE
JUNIOR ENGINEER
1.00
$ 3,247
$ 4,156
NE
LEAD MAINTENANCE WORKER
4.00
$ 3,027
$ 3,873
NE
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR
1.00
$ 4,237
$ 5,423
E
MAINTENANCE SUPT. - P/W
1.00
$ 5,206
$ 6,663
E
MAINTENANCE WORKER
5.00
$ 2,571
$ 3,291
NE
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
1.00
$ 4,619
$ 5,913
E
OFFICE ASSISTANT
3.00
$ 2,020
$ 2,585
NE
OFFICE SPECIALIST
3.00
$ 2,178
$ 2,788
NE
PRINCIPAL ENGINEER
3.00
$ 6,597
$ 8,444
E
PROPERTY AGENT
1.00
$ 4,912
$ 6,287
E
PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
2.00
$ 3,671
$ 4,699
NE
SENIOR ENGINEER
2.00
$ 5,792
$ 7,414
E
SENIOR PUBLIC WORKS INSPECTOR
4.00
$ 4,221
$ 5,403
NE
SENIOR SIGNAL TECHNICIAN
1.00
$ 4,237
$ 5,423
NE
SPECIAL PROJECTS ENGINEER
1.00
$ 4,912
$ 6,287
E
Public Works
Subtotals:
53.75
Redevelopment
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
1.00
$ 2,888
$ 3,697
NE
DIR OF HOUSING & REDEVELOPMENT
1.00
$ 7,581
$ 9,704
E
MANAGEMENT ANALYST
1.00
$ 4,619
$ 5,913
E
Redevelopment
Subtotals:
3.00
Totals:
Building & Safety
20.00
City Clerk
8.50
City Council
5.00
City Manager
9.00
Community Services
33.00
Finance
14.50
Fire
2.00
Information Systems
9.00
Planning
22.00
Police
1.00
Public Works
53.75
Redevelopment
3.00
Total of Authorized Positions: 180.75
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
ESTABLISHING THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR FY 2004-05
WHEREAS, the voters approved the Gann Spending -Limitation Initiative (Proposition 4) on
November 6, 1979, adding Article XII1 B to the Constitution of the State of California to establish and
define annual appropriation limits on state and local governmental entities;
WHEREAS, SB 1352 provides for the implementation of Article Xlll B by defining various
terms used in this article and prescribing procedures to be used in implementing specific provisions
of the article, including the establishment by resolution each year by the governing body of each
local jurisdiction of its appropriations limits;
WHEREAS, the required computations to determine the Appropriations Limit for FY 2004-05
have been performed by the Finance Department and are on file with the office of the City Clerk,
and available for public review;
WHEREAS, these computations are provided on Exhibit "A" which is herein incorporated by
reference and attached hereto;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as
follows:
Section 1. The Appropriations Limit for the City of Temecula for FY 2004-05 is hereby
adopted.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a
certified resolution to be filed in the office of the City Clerk.
10
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 81h day of June 2004.
Michael Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) SS
CITY OF TEMECULA)
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 04- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula
at a regular meeting thereof held on the 80' day of June, 2004, by the following vote of the City
Council:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
11
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMPUTATION OF GANN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
FY 2003-04 Appropriation Limit................................................................. $57,175,848
FY 2004-05 City Population Change*...................................................................2.39%
FY 2004-05 Increase in Non -Residential Assessed Valuation**...............................7.45%
Cumulative Compound (1.0239 x 1.0745)..........................................................10.02%
FY 2004-05 Appropriation Limit................................................................. $62,903,756
* Source: State of California Department of Finance
* * Source: HdL Coren & Cone
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
OPERATING BUDGET
FUND SUMMARIES
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
GENERALFUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
2003-04
2003-04
2004-05
Proposed
%
2002-03
YTD
Current
Proposed
Increase
Increase
Actual
0411612004
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
(Decrease)
42460,316
30128,002
44341,528
49122,100
4780572
10.8%
Total Revenues
Expenditures by Dept:
399,151
238,520
434,250
380,200
(64,050)
-12.4%
City Council
409,153
383,698
477,000
401,700
(75,300)
-15.8%
Community Support
838,911
676,679
941,751
1,006,100
64,349
6.8%
City Manager
Economic Development
727,175
574,254
821,833
830,600
8,767
(44,785)
1.1%
-4.7%
City Clerk
762,500
572,258
956,785
915,000
912,000
850,000
(65,000)
-7.1%
City Attorney
771,195
1,410,967
295,339
1,032,742
1,703,060
1,729,900
26,840
1.6%
Finance
444,267
316,994
447,480
486,300
38,820
8.7%
Human Resources
3,007,441
1,934,193
3,048,885
3,061,790
12,905
0.4%
Planning
Building & Safety
2,026,886
1,602,649
2,482,503
2,592,840
110,337
138,175
4.4%
Land Development
1,444,014
1,229,267
1,825,126
6,463,558
1,963,300
5,315,800
(147,758)
-.%
2.7
Public Works
3,845,877
1,763,869
2,922,137
1,379,955
2,101,882
2,358,300
256,418
12.2%
CIP Admin
10,309,738
8,301,780
11,549,845
13,516,300
1,966,455
17.0%
Police
3,351,552
2,048,728
4,255,823
5,081,900
826,077
19.4%
Fire
Animal Control
98,280
67,243
2,901,819
132,000
6,622,246
132,000
6,549,400
27,154
0.4%
Non -Departmental
4,960,326
Total Expenditures
36 571,302
26,478,254
44 079,027
47 168,430
3,089,403
7.0%
Excess of Revenues Over
5,889,014
3,649,747
262,501
1,953,670
1,691,169
(Under) Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out:
2 209,000
2,166,955
6,210,656
3,730,816
(2,479,840)
Capital Projects
Total Operating Transfers Out
2,209,000
2,166,955
6,210,656
3,730,816
(2,479,840)
Excess of Revenues Over
(Under) Expenditures and
3,680,014
1,482,792
(5,948,155)
(1, 777146)
4,171,009
Operating Transfers Out
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
GENERALFUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
2003-04 2003-04
2004-05
2002-03
YTD Current
Proposed
Actual
@ 4/16/2004 Budget
Budget
Fund Balance, Beg. of Year 23,030,905
26,710,919 26,710,919
21,762,764 (1)
Revenues 42,460,316
30,128,002 44,341,528
49,122,100
Expenditures and Transfers Out (38,780,302)
(28,645,209) (50,289,683)
(60,899,246)
Fund Balance, End of Year 26,710,919
28,193,711 20,762,764
19,985,618
Detail of Fund Balance:
Reserved for land held for resale
-
Reserved for long-term advance to RDA
870,176
Reserved for long-term advance to CIP (Chaparral Pool)
600,000
Reserved for long-term receivables
288,270
Reserved for comprehensive annual leave
1,058,400
Unreserved:
Designated for continuing appropriation
200,543
Designated for economic uncertainty
10,000,000
Designated for retiree benefits
1,570,851
Designated for open space
506,226
Designated for Dutch Villages
150,000
Designated for State Budget impacts
2,500,000
Designated for Flood Control
2,000,000
Undesignated
241,152
19,986,618
(1) Staff is projecting $1,000,000 in FY2003-04 net revenue to be carried over
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
GAS TAX FUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures and Operating
Transfers Out
Fund Balance, Beg. of Year
2003-04
2003-04
2004-05
Proposed
2002-03 YTD
Current
Proposed
Increase
Increase
Actual @ 4/16/2004
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
(Decrease)
1,508,373 921,106
1,368,850
1,395,500
26,650
1.9%
1,508,373 921,106 1,368,850 1,395,500 26,650
1366,664 724,293 1,368,850 1,395,500
141,719 196,812 141,719 - 26,650
141,719
Fund Balance, End of Year 141,719 141,719
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out:
CIP Fund
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures and Operating
Transfers Out
Fund Balances, Beg. of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
2003-04
2003-04 2004-05
Proposed
2002-03
YTD
Current Proposed
Increase Increase
Actual
0 4/16/2004
Budget Budget
(Decrease) (Decrease)
190,664
659
-
-
20,435
20,435 -
(20,435)
190,664
(19,776)
(20,435)
20,435
120,387 20,435
70,277 (40,211) (20,435) 20,436
22,620 92,897 72,462
92,897 72,462 72,462
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND EQUITY
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures by Fund:
Insurance
Vehicles
Information Systems
Support Services
Facilities
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
Operating Transfers In (Out):
General Fund (Vehicles)
Excess of Revenues and Operating
Transfers Over (Under) Expenditures
Retained Earnings, Beg. of Year
Retained Earnings, End of Year
2003-04
2003-04
2004-05
Proposed
2002-03
YTD
Current
Proposed
Increase
Increase
Actual
@ 4/16/2004
Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
(Decrease)
3263,887
1695,877
3,722,528
3993900
271,372
7.3%
514,841
327,281
633,815
675,300
41,485
6.6
215,668
124,795
243,600
291,900
48,300
19.8%
1,577,411
1,272,135
1,873,615
1,909,600
35,985
1.9%
279,172
183,699
292,655
293,610
955
0.3%
523519
396,160
655352
648,100
(7,252)
-1.1%
3,110,611
2,304,070
3,699,037
3,818,510
119,473
3.2%
153,276
79,000
(608,193) 23,491
232,276 (608,193)
3,245,230
3,477,506
23,491
175,390 151,899
175,390 161,899
3,477,506 3,500,997
3,500,997 3,676,387
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
CDBG FUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out`:
CIP Fund
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures and Operating
Transfers Out
Fund Balances, Beg. of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
2003-04
2003-04
2004-05
2002-03
YTD
Current
Proposed
Actual
@ 4/16/2004
Budget
Budget
50,500
33,261
386,964
478,400
50,500
-
386,964
478,400
33,261
33,261
Proposed
Increase Increase
(Decrease) (Decrease)
91,436
91,436
CITY OF TEMECULA
SUMMARY OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, AND CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE
LAW ENFORCEMENT FUND
2004-05 PROPOSED OPERATING BUDGET
Total Revenues
Total Expenditures
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures
Operating Transfers Out`:
CIP Fund
Excess of Revenues Over (Under)
Expenditures and Operating
Transfers Out
Fund Balances, Beg. of Year
Fund Balances, End of Year
2003-04 2003-04
2004-05
Proposed
2002-03 YTD Current
Proposed
Increase
Increase
Actual @ 4/16/2004 Budget
Budget
(Decrease)
(Decrease)
140,726 - 146,500
101,000
(45,500)
140,726
146,500
101,000
(45,500)
140,726
146500
101,000
(45,500)
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
OPERATING BUDGET
GENERAL FUND
GENERAL FUND REVENUES BY SOURCE
Actual
Actual
Estimated
Projected
FY 2001.02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Taxes and Franchises
Property Tax
$ 2,330,541
$ 2,688,774
$ 2,602,180
$ 2,884,000
Franchise Fees
1,861,385
1,896,915
2,052,000
2,130,000
Sales and Use Tax
19,237,317
21,572,199
24,067,000
24,820,600
Property Transfer Tax
570,974
603,374
863,960
900,000
Transient Occupancy Tax
1,424,167
1,551,113
1,672,540
1,820,000
Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges
230,940
271,467
215,000
270,000
Business Licenses
Land Development
2,135,359
1,984,921
2,203,727
2,403,800
Building
1,464,047
1,851,719
1,855,400
2,155,400
Planning
509,655
488,882
397,650
776,000
Fire
173,029
228,816
302,870
821,000
Fines and Forfeitures
586,364
758,852
839,230
1,000,000
Use ofMoney
908,409
561,577
530,000
400,000
Inveestment Interest
Intergovernmental Revenues
3,698,338
4,076,956
2,400,660
3,966,400
Motor Vehicle in Lieu
105,009
85,599
60,000
55,000
Motor Vehicle License Fees
207,215
58,617
82,776
123,000
Grants
ERAF/Booking Fee Reimbursement
106,867
106,867
106,800
Reimbursement from
695,225
1,174,300
1,699,908
1,886,700
Capital Improvement Program
162,000
162,000
162,000
162,000
Community Services District
225,000
225,000
225,000
225,000
Redevelopment Agency
136,823
119,475
179,800
544,600
Other
Operating Transfers In
1,278,978
1,508,248
1,515,350
1,496,500
Miscellaneous
397,284
484,644
307,677
282,100
Total
$38,444,926
$42,460,316
$44,341,528
$49,122,100
Franchise Fees
Intergovernmental Reimbursement 4
8 6'V0 Licenses and Permits
Operating Transfers
In � Investment Interest
I'%
Transient Occupancy
Tax Fines and Forfeitures
4'Vo TV4
Other
1'%,
Propert} Tax
8`%.
Sales and Use Tax
50
EXPENDITURE SUMMARY BY CATEGORY - GENERAL FUND
Operations Capital
Department
Personnel
& Maintenance Outlay
Total
City Council:
City Council
$ 118,600
$ 261,600
$ 380,200
Community Support
401,700
401,700
City Manager:
City Manager
725,900
280,200
1,006,100
Economic Development
236,300
594,300
830,600
Human Resources
279,000
207,300
486,300
City Attorney
850,000
850,000
City Clerk
592,700
319,300
912,000
Finance
1,269,500
460,400
1,729,900
Community Development:
Planning
2,278,700
783,090
3,061,790
Building & Safety
1,960,940
631,900
2,592,840
Land Development
1,569,900
393,400
1,963,300
Public Works:
Public Works
1,808,600
3,494,700
$ 12,500
5,315,800
CIP Administration
2,007,600
350,700
2,358,300
Police
100,500
13,373,800
42,000
13,516,300
Fire
158,000
4,727,800
196,100
5,081,900
Animal Control
132,000
132,000
Non -Departmental
6,549,400
6,549,400
Total
$13,106,240
$ 33,811,590
$ 250,600
47,168,430
Operating Transfers to CIP
3,730,816
Total
$ 50,899,246
City Manager City Attorney City Clerk
$2,323,000 $850,000 $912,000
Finance
City Council I $1,729,900 Community
$781,900 Development
$7,617,930
Non- �PubGc Works
Departmental $7,674,100
$6,549,400
Animal Control
$132,000 Police $13,516,300
Fire $5,081,900
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
GENERALFUND
CITY COUNCIL
Councilmembers
CITY MANAGER
City Manager
Assistant City Manager
Assistant to the City Manager/HR. Director
Senior Management Analyst
Executive Assistant
Human Resources Analyst
Marketing Coordinator
Human Resources Specialist
Administrative Assistant
Total
CITY CLERK
Authorized Authorized
2003-04 Changes 2004.05
5.00 0.00 5.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
� 11
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
W1741,
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
W
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Director of Support Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Records Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Minute Clerk
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
2.00
0.00
2.00
Total
7.00
0.00
7.00
FINANCE
Director of Finance
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Finance Director
1.00
0.00
1.00
Fiscal Services Manager
0.75
0.00
0.75
Revenue Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Accountant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Debt Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Accountant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
0.75
0.00
0.75
Accounting Specialist
3.00
0.00
3.00
Purchasing Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Business License Specialist/Cashier
1.00
0.00
1.00
Accounting Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Total
14.00
0.00
14.00
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
Authorized
Authorized
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING 2003.04
Changes
2004.05
Deputy City Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Director of Planning
1.00
0.00
1.00
Principal Planner
3.00
0.00
3.00
Senior Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Associate Planner
6.00
0.00
6.00
Development Processing Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer B
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer I
2.00
0.00
2.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
2.00
0.00
2.00
Office Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Total
22.00
0.00
22.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY
Director of Building and Safety
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Building Official
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
Plan Checker / Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
Building Inspector B
7.00
1.00
8.00
Building Inspector III
1.00
0.00
1.00
Community Development Technician
4.00
0.00
4.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
2.00
0.00
2.00
Office Assistant
20.00
1.00
21.00
Total
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - LAND DEVELOPMENT
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.30
0.00
0.30
0.30
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.30
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
Senior Engineer
3.00
0.00
3.00
Associate Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Special Projects Engineer
2.00
0 O0
2.00
Senior Public Works Inspector
0.00
3.00.00
Assistant Engineer
0.00
1.00
Junior Engineer
1.00
1
1.
0.00
1.
Engineering Tech M
50
1.50
0.00
1.50
0
Public Works Inspector
0.25
0.00
0.25
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
0.33
1.00
1.33
Office Assistant
15.68
1.00
16.68
Total
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
Authorized
Authorized
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - PLANNING 2003-04
Changes
2004.05
Deputy City Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Director of Planning
1.00
0.00
1.00
Principal Planner
3.00
0.00
3.00
Senior Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Management Analyst
0.00
0.00
0.00
Associate Planner
6.00
0.00
6.00
Development Processing Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer U
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer I
2.00
0.00
2.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
2.00
0.00
2.00
Office Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Total
22.00
0.00
22.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - BUILDING & SAFETY
Director of Building and Safety
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Building Official
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
1.00
Plan Checker / Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
1.00
Building Inspector B
7.00
1.00
8.00
Building Inspector lII
1.00
0.00
1.00
Community Development Technician
4.00
0.00
4.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Total
20.00
1.00
21.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - LAND DEVELOPMENT
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.30
0.00
0.30
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.30
0.00
.30
Senior Engineer
1.00
0.00
1
1.00
Associate Engineer
3.00
0.00
3.00
Special Projects Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Public Works Inspector
2.00
0.00
2.00
Assistant Engineer
3.00
0.00
3.00
Junior Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Engineering Tech lII
1.00
0.00
1.00
Public Works Inspector
1.50
0.00
1.50
Administrative Assistant
0.25
0.00
0.25
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
0.33
1.00
1.33
15.68
1.00
16.68
Total
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
Authorized
Authorized
PUBLIC WORKS
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.40
0.00
0.40
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.40
0.00
0.40
Principal Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Associate Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Superintendent
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Junior Engineer
0.50
0.00
0.50
Maintenance Supervisor
1.00
0.00
1.00
Management Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Landscape Inspector
0.25
0.00
0.25
Administrative Assistant
0.50
0.00
0.50
Senior Signal Technician
1.00
0.00
1.00
Lead Maintenance Worker
4.00
0.00
4.00
Maintenance Worker
5.00
0.00
5.00
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.33
0.00
1.33
Office Assistant
19.88
0.00
19.88
Total
PUBLIC WORKS - CIP ADMINISTRATION
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.30
0.00
0.30
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.30
0.00
0.30
2.00
0.00
2.00
Principal Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Engineer
4.00
0.00
4.00
Associate Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Construction Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Property Agent
2.00
0.00
2.00
Senior Public Works Inspector
0.00
3.00
Assistant Engineer
3.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
Management Analyst
0.75
0.00
0.75
CIP Specialist
0.50
0.00
0.50
Public Works Inspector
0.25
0.00
0.25
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
0.34
1.00
1.34
Office Assistant
17.94
1.00
18.94
Total
Police
0.00
1.00
1 AO
Management Analyst
0.00
1.00
1.00
Total
FIRE
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
0.00
1.00
1.00
Office Specialist
1.00
1.00
2.00
Total
General Fund Total
131.50
5.00
136.50
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
COMMUNITY SERVICES
Authorized
Authorized
PARKS AND RECREATION
2.003-04
Changes
2004.05
Director of Community Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Director of Community Services
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Superintendent
0.70
0.00
0.70
Development Services Administrator
0.85
0.00
0.85
Recreation Superintendent
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Services Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Supervisor
1.40
0.00
1.40
Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor
0.00
0.00
0.00
Management Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Senior Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Museum Services Manager
2.00
0.00
2.00
Theater Manager
0.00
1.00
1.00
Aquatics Supervisor
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Supervisor
3.00
0.00
3.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Lead Maintenance Worker
1.50
0.00
1.50
Senior Recreation Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Recreation Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Landscape Inspector
1.25
0.00
1.25
Maintenance Worker
2.50
0.00
2.50
Office Specialist
2.30
0.00
2.30
Custodian
1.00
0.00
1.00
Total
25.50
1.00
26.50
SERVICE LEVEL B
Management Analyst
0.05
0.00
0.05
SERVICE LEVEL C
Maintenance Superintendent
0.05
0.00
0.05
Maintenance Supervisor
0.30
0.00
0.30
Management Analyst
0.30
0.00
0.30
Senior Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Landscape Inspector
0.50
0.00
0.50
Office Specialist
0.30
0.00
0.30
Total
1.95
0.00
1.95
SERVICE LEVEL D
Development Services Administrator
0.15
0.00
0.15
Management Analyst
0.15
0.00
0.15
Office Specialist
0.10
0.00
0.10
Total
0.40
0.00
0.40
Community Services Total
27.90
1.00
28.90
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
Authorized
Authorized
INSURANCE
2003.04
Changes
2004-05
Fiscal Services Manager
0.25
0.00
0.25
Administrative Assistant
0.25
0.00
0.25
Total
0.50
0.00
0.50
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Director of Information Systems
1.00
0.00
1.00
Information Systems Administrator
2.00
0.00
2.00
Information Systems Engineer
0.00
1.00
1.00
Information Systems Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
GIS Administrator
1.00
0.00
1.00
GIS Analyst
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Webmaster
1.00
0.00
1.00
Total
8.00
1.00
9.00
SUPPORT SERVICES
Central Services Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
0.50
0.00
0.50
Total
1.50
0.00
1.50
FACILITIES
Maintenance Superintendent
0.25
0.00
0.25
Maintenance Supervisor
0.30
0.00
0.30
Facility Maintenance Coordinator
0.50
0.00
0.50
Lead Maintenance Worker
0.50
0.00
0.50
Maintenance Worker
0.50
0.00
0.50
Custodian
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
0.30
0.00
0.30
Total
3.35
0.00
3.35
Internal Service Funds Total
13.35
1.00
14.35
PERSONNEL ALLOCATION BY DEPARTMENT
LOWIMOD HOUSING
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Total
Director of Housing/Redevelopment
Senior Management Analyst
Administrative Assistant
Total
Redevelopment Agency Total
TOTAL AUTHORIZED POSITIONS
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
0.75
0.00
0.75
0.75
0.00
0.75
0.50
0.00
0.50
2.00
0.00
2.00
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
3.00
174.75
6.00
180.75
COMMISSIONS
ASSISTANT
CITY MANAGER
James O'Grady
CITIZENS
OF TEMECULA
CITY
COUNCIL
CITY MANAGER �I CITY ATTORNEY
Shawn D. Nelson Peter M. Thorson
DEVELOPMENT
ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC SAFETY
DEVELOPMENT
Deputy City Manager
Gary Thornhill
Public Works
Bill Hughes
City Clerk/
Support Services
C a� w t ��
Fire
Howard Windsor
Building�Elmo
Tony
11
Redevelopment "`"b"' Police Plannin
John Meyer Human Resources Grant Yates 11 Ll Jim Domenoe 11 Debbie Ubnoske
Community Services
Herman D. Parker
Finance
Genie Roberts
Info Systems
Tim Thorson
CITIZENS
OF
TEMECULA
Mayor Mayor Pro Tern Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember
tel S. Naggar 11 Jeff Comerchero 11 11 Ron Roberts 11 11 Jeffrey E. Stone 11 11 Chuck Washingto
Program: City Council
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Program: Community Support
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Personnel Allocation
Department Total
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
Funding Source: General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
$ 81,695
$ 101,915
$ 122,860
$ 118,600
259,500
297,236
311,390
261,600
$ 341,195
$ 399,151
$ 434,250
$ 380,200
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004.05
$ 402,728
$ 409,153
$ 477,000
$ 401,700
$ 402,728
$ 409,153
$ 477,000
$ 401,700
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
5.00
0.00
5.00
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
PROGRAM: CITY COUNCIL
MISSION: The City Council is elected by the citizens of Temecula to set overall policies, legislative
and otherwise, to give direction to the City Manager to ensure his effective and efficient
operation of the City and to identify the types and levels of programs and services to be
provided to its residents.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Secured an $8.5 Million Library Grant
• Preserved 200 acres of open space
• Acquired property in Old Town for future public use
• Completed the Children's Museum
• Widened Rancho California Bridge
• Added four new parks
• Adopted TUMF fees
• Created Community PAD (Public Access to Defibrillator) Program
• Secured new Fire Department ladder truck through development agreement
• Provided police ratio of one officer per 960 residents
• Expanded the Temecula Citizen Corps (TCC)
GOAL 1: PROVIDE A SAFE, SECURE, CLEAN, HEALTHY, AND ORDERLY COMMUNITY
BY BALANCING THE UTILIZATION OF OPEN SPACE, PARKS, TRAIL
FACILITIES, QUALITY JOBS, PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION, AND ADEQUATE
INFRASTRUCTURE
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Encourage recreational and educational programs for all age groups
➢ Preserve natural resources while stimulating technology and promoting commerce
➢ Adopt City Ordinances using sound fiscal policy
➢ Enhance and revitalize historic areas
➢ Provide clear policy direction to City staff in programs and services offered by the City
➢ Adopt policies and procedures using legislative action consistent with City goals
➢ Encourage local job creation through retention and attraction efforts
GOAL 2: WORK COLLABORATIVELY WITH THE CITY MANAGER TO ENSURE THAT
ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS OPERATE AS SMOOTHLY AND EFFECTIVELY AS
POSSIBLE
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Organize community workshops to assist in developing action plans
➢ Maintain regular updates and accessible information on City web site
➢ Distribute quarterly newsletters to update the community on capital projects, recreational
events, and other community items of interest
➢ Use City Council meeting intermissions to disseminate community information
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
GOAL 3: IMPROVE THE CITY'S INFLUENCE IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS AND
INTRAGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Lobby State legislators to ensure they support positions that further the City's interest
➢ Lobby Federal legislators to obtain funds for the City's transportation systems upgrades
➢ Continue City Council member attendance and participation on local, regional,
statewide, and national boards and commissions
➢ Continue joint meetings with the Temecula Valley Unified School District Board so that
the two governing entities are working towards common goals
➢ Work closely with City of Temecula Commissions through joint meetings and
Commissioner participation during Council meetings
➢ Continue to support the Temecula Sister City Association to enhance foreign relations
with Temecula's Sister Cities
GOAL4: EFFECTIVELY IMPLEMENT AND ADMINISTER THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT PLAN
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Work collectively with Riverside County and participate in the Riverside County
Integrated Planning (RCIP) process
➢ Coordinate efforts with the City of Murrieta, particularly in the areas of traffic
circulation and economic development
➢ Meet regularly with Temecula Valley Unified School District on issues of mutual
concern and work to develop consensus on solutions
➢ Maintain cooperative working relationships with the Pechanga Tribe
GOAL5: ENHANCE COMMUNICATION TO ENSURE THAT CITIZENS ARE WELL
INFORMED ON COMMUNITY ISSUES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Organize community workshops to assist in developing action plans
➢ Maintain regular updates and accessible information on the City website
➢ Distribute quarterly newsletters to update the community on capital projects, recreational
events, and other community items of interest
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Percent of citizen concerns responded to
within 5 business days of receipt
Number of citizen concern correspondences
addressed
Number of outside organization meetings
Projected
FY 2002-03
Actual
FY 2002-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-OS
95%
95%
95%
95%
300
109
80
70
270
300
320
500
DEPARTMENT: CITY COUNCIL
PROGRAM: COMMUNITY SUPPORT
MISSION: The Community Support Program is responsible for funding various special programs
within the City, such as the Community Services Funding Program, Library funding,
and Sister Cities Program. It also funds the Temecula Valley Arts Council and the
Temecula Valley Playhouse providing cultural events to the community.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Sponsored Susan G. Komen Race for the Cure
Continued sponsorship and support for the Temecula Arts Council & Temecula Valley
Playhouse
GOAL 1: FUND LOCAL NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS, WHICH PROVIDE THE
CITIZENS OF TEMECULA CULTURAL EVENTS, NEEDED SERVICES OR
EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of organizations funded
Total funding for organizations/community
Number of students funded for exchange
trips to sister cities
Projected
FY 2002-03
Actual
FY 2602-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-05
55
55
55
55
$407,000
$409,153
$406,200
$421,500
20
20
12
20
CITY MANAGER
James O'Grady
CITY MANAGER/
HR DIRECTOR
GENERAL
ADMINISTRATION
Public Information
Intergovernmental
Public Relations
Animal Control
CITY MANAGER
Shawn D. Nelson
EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT
Preparedness
Coordination
Tmining
Emergency
Operations Center
CITY MANAGER
Gary Thornhill
ECONOMIC
HUMAN
DEVELOPMENT
RESOURCES
Business Attraction
Benefits
Business Retention
Employment
Marketing
Training
Labor Development' Employee Relations
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
Program: City Manager
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 424,937
$ 603,979
$ 657,335
$ 725,900
Operations & Maintenance
220,841
234,931
284,416
280,200
Capital Outlay
$ 645,778
$ 838,911
$ 941,751
$ 1,006,100
Program: Economic Development
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 240,510
$ 192,494
$ 217,870
$ 236,300
Operations & Maintenance
544,307
534,682
603,963
594,300
Capital Outlay
$ 784,817
$ 727,175
$ 821,833
$ 830,600
Program: Human Resources
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 174,079
$ 221,040
$ 249,230
$ 279,000
Operations & Maintenance
198,040
223,228
198,250
207,300
Capital Outlay
$ 372,119 $ 444,267 $ 447,480 $ 486,300
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
Personnel Allocation
CITY MANAGER
City Manager
Assistant to City Manager/HR Director
Senior Management Analyst
Executive Assistant
Administrative Assistant
Total
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
Assistant City Manager
Marketing Coordinator
Total
HUMAN RESOURCES
Assistant to the City Manager/HR Director
Human Resources Analyst
Human Resources Specialist
Total
Department Total
Authorized Authorized
2003-04 Changes 2004-05
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
4.50
0.00
4.50
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.50
0.00
2.50
9.00
0.00
9.00
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
PROGRAM: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
MISSION: The City Manager is appointed by the City Council to serve as the Chief Administrative
Officer of the organization. The City Manager's Office coordinates the implementation
of policy and programs established by the City Council. The City Manager provides
overall direction to the administration of City programs and services; coordinates
economic development and marketing activities; inter -governmental relations, lobbying,
and public relations efforts; oversees inter -departmental programs for human
resources, strategic planning, emergency preparedness and animal control.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Intergovernmental relations include: Multi -Species Habitat Conservation (MSHCP),
Riverside County Integrated Plan (RCIP), Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee
(TUMF), Indian Gaming (AB621), Highway 79 North and South (SB87)
• Participated in and supported the Chamber of Commerce Government Action Committee
• Coordinated City Council business & special engagements
Authored and lobbied for the Library Grant application and successful funding
• Actively involved in the planning and design of a higher education campus
GOAL1: COORDINATE THE WORK EFFORTS OF ALL CITY DEPARTMENTS TO
ACHIEVE CITY COUNCIL AND COMMUNITY GOALS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct weekly staff meetings with all Department Directors to ensure work efforts are
coordinated effectively
➢ Conduct a Department Director retreat to establish service level and program goals
➢ Encourage and provide resources for continued education and staff development
➢ Respond to all citizen complaints within a timely manner
GOAL2: COORDINATE AND PROVIDE TIMELY AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO
THE PUBLIC AND MEDIA REGARDING CITY EVENTS AND ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Prepare timely press releases regarding City events and activities
➢ Conduct monthly press briefings
➢ Develop and publish the community newsletter
➢ Serve as primary media contact
GOAL 3: UPHOLD THE CITY'S SUPERIOR LEVEL OF CUSTOMER SERVICE BY
PROACTIVELY SUPPORTING EMPLOYEES IN MAINTAINING POSITIVE
CITIZEN RELATIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide training to all employees on the importance of positive customer service and
public relations efforts
➢ Facilitate staff and City Council workshops to obtain public input regarding City projects
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
GOAL 4: REPRESENT THE CITY'S INTERESTS IN INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Assign staff resources and coordinate with Riverside County through the Riverside
County Integrated Planning process
➢ Attend monthly Western Riverside Council of Governments Technical Advisory
Committee Meetings
➢ Track legislative bills and provide support/opposition as requested or required
➢ Encourage State and Federal legislatures to use City Hall as community resource
➢ Encourage department directors or assigned staff to attend relevant intergovernmental
meetings and report on pertinent issues
Projected
Actual Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04
FV 2004-05
Number of legislative responses submitted
25
30 30
35
Number of community workshops held
4
4 5
6
Number of community newsletters published
3
3 3
4
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
PROGRAM: EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT
MISSION: In case of emergency, the City Manager is the Disaster Director. The mission of this
program is to implement, monitor and coordinate the Standardized Emergency
Management System (SEMS) and Emergency Operations Center (EOC). This program
also provides overall coordination and training, and monitors the operational readiness
within the various sections of the emergency management organizational structure.
This program promotes increased preparedness of the City to respond to disasters.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Hosted two Public Safety Expos
• Further developed the Temecula Citizen Corps (TCC) program
• Coordinated AED/CPR training for City staff
• Introduced and organized a Public Access to Defibrillators (PAD) program
• Ensured public access to defibrillators
• Conducted Standardized Emergency Management Systems training for City staff
• Conducted disaster drill training
GOAL 1: ENSURE ALL CITY EMPLOYEES ARE ADEQUATELY TRAINED ON HOW TO
REACT AND WHAT ROLE TO ASSUME DURING AN EMERGENCY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Send employees through the County of Riverside's Planning/Logistics course
➢ Continue to work through the emergency management committee to implement the
updated Multi -Hazard Function Plan
➢ Continue to train employees by simulating actual City disasters
GOAL 2: INFORM/INVOLVE THE COMMUNITY IN THE CITY'S DISASTER PLANS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Continue TCC training program Citywide
➢ Develop an annex to our Multi -Hazard Function Plan for the TCC program
➢ Coordinate with the TCC program to develop a plan to involve homeowners'
associations with disaster preparedness plans
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of employees trained in Emergency
Management courses
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
50 75 100 100
Number of meetings/training drills held 20 7 5 10
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
PROGRAM: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
MISSION: The Economic Development Program is responsible for maintaining a sound and
diverse economic base for business development and tourism for the City. The
Economic Development partners have been a key component in Temecula's success as
they have worked together with City Council and City Staff. Such groups include the
Southwest Riverside County Economic Alliance, Economic Development Corporation of
Southwest Riverside County, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, the Inland
Empire Economic Partnership, and the Temecula Valley Film Council. Through these
professional affiliations many partnerships have been formed, which have helped to
create a strong healthy economy and enhance our exceptional quality of life.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Negotiated the Temecula Auto Mall Development Agreement
• Negotiated the sale of 27500 Jefferson to Kin Auto Dealership
• Worked with colleges and community groups to facilitate planning of the Temecula
Higher Education Center
• Recognized in the Kosmont Cost of Doing Business Survey as a "very low cost City"
• Recognized in the California CEO Magazine -Top 25 Cities to do business in (Temecula
ranked as #11)
• Received two awards for the interactive tourism CD -Rom
• Produced local business brochure and demographic marketing insert
GOAL1: DEVELOP DIVERSE ECONOMIC BASE TO INCLUDE A RANGE OF
MANUFACTURING, RETAIN AND SERVICE ACTIVITIES, AND VINTNERS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Attract new business including high tech, semi -conductor and health
technology/manufacturing, biomedical/biotech, telecommunications, electronics, office,
vintners and research and development space
➢ Promote retail and other support activities that provide a broader selection of high quality
goods and services for residents, workers and tourists, including automobiles, apparel,
general merchandise, home furnishings, appliances and restaurants
GOAL 2: DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN AN ECONOMIC BASE THAT PROVIDES A SOUND
FISCAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CITY AS WELL AS QUALITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES AND HIGH SERVICE LEVELS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Promote Temecula as a major retail hub along the Interstate 15 corridor to help lure high
end retailers/restaurants
➢ Monitor existing businesses and continue to support business retention and expansion
efforts
➢ Provide site selection assistance through updated City/Alliance GIS search capabilities
and demographics and personal site tours
➢ Update economic demographic data base
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
GOAL 3: ESTABLISH A DIVERSE EDUCATION, TRAINING AND JOB PLACEMENT
SYSTEM, WHICH WILL DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY WORK
FORCE IN TEMECULA
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Work with colleges on developing a higher education center
➢ Support and develop activities in higher education and skills training for excellent
workforce development with the school district and local colleges
➢ Supportjob placement through City website, job databases, job fairs and posting system
GOAL 4: DEVELOP TEMECULA AS A COMPREHENSIVE, RECOGNIZABLE TOURIST
DESTINATION, WITH A RANGE OF ATTRACTIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Increase the number of tourists visiting Temecula and increase attendance at all special
events through the marketing outreach and promotional program
➢ Promote Temecula as a prime tourist destination in cooperation with the winery industry
in the Temecula Valley, Convention and Visitors Bureau and special event organizations
➢ Revitalize and enhance Old Town to expand its role in local tourism and improve its
attractiveness, accessibility, and economic vitality through the development of the
Children's Museum, Community theater, and special events
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FV 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of alliance inquiries
4,000
2,796
5,000
4,000
Number of alliance/City leads
300
99
400
300
Number of trade shows
10
4
10
7
Number of business ad placements
N/A
11
7
10
Number of broker breakfasts
3
1
3
3
Total employment
N/A
35,500
35,900
36,200
Number of retention visits
60
18
60
60
Number of Mayor's business roundtables
2
2
3
9
Number of Site Finder GIS page hits
N/A
N/A
6,000
8,000
Number of students enrolled in ROP programs
N/A
N/A
977
1,000
Number of tourism trade shows
4
4
4
4
Number of media placements
20
26
20
25
Number of special events sponsored
8
8
8
12
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
PROGRAM: HUMAN RESOURCES
MISSION: Human Resources is responsible for providing a comprehensive human resources
program throughout the City. Responsibilities of Human Resources include the
administration of recruitment; selection; equal opportunity; classification; salary;
employee benefits; worker's compensation; discipline; training development; employee
relations; and development and implementation of administrative guidelines and
personnel policies.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Adopted an employee assistance program supervisor training
• Adopted mid -manager buddy program
• Created a new hire orientation booklet
• Revitalized the existing recognition program
• Researched and developed revised PEACS evaluation
GOAL 1: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SUPPORT TO ALL DEPARTMENTS IN THE AREAS
OF RECRUITMENT, EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, WORKER'S COMPENSATION,
EMPLOYEE DISCIPLINE AND LABOR RELATIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain a six -week recruitment processing timeline
➢ Administer employee benefit programs to include conducting annual open enrollment
and providing input to benefit providers via City benefit committee, made up of
representatives from each City department
➢ Meet routinely with employee labor/management team to discuss areas of mutual interest
➢ Maintain City Hall bulletin boards
GOAL 2: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYEES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Publish a list of in-house training opportunities
➢ Proactively involve employees in training opportunities, both in-house and outside
➢ Facilitate bi-monthly management training luncheons
➢ Provide three training days per year for each City employee
GOAL3: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT IN THE AREA OF
EMPLOYEE MORALE FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Administer and improve upon employee recognition program, including quarterly
Temecula Pride/Good Deed Award luncheons
➢ Promote "My Bright Idea" Program
➢ Facilitate and direct Administrative Support Group
➢ Facilitate direct special assignment committee and participate in mid -manager's group
➢ Recognize public safety employees of the year
DEPARTMENT: CITY MANAGER
GOAL 4: PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL GUIDANCE AND SUPPORT IN THE AREAS OF
WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND SAFETY FOR CITY EMPLOYEES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct monthly employee safety meetings to implement the City's injury and illness
prevention program
➢ Conduct fire drills and safety inspections
➢ Promote injury prevention programs
➢ Continuous heightening of "Safety First" awareness by offering safety training
➢ Administer Tailgate Safety Program
➢ Administer Safe Driving Program
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of recruitments conducted
Percent of recruitments within
a six -week timeline
Number of applications processed
Number of employee safety meetings
Number of mid -management meetings
Number of training days provided per
employee
Number of employees receiving recognition
awards
Number of Temecula Pride luncheons
Number of administrative support group
meetings
Percent of evaluations processed within
prescribed timeframes
Projected
FY 2002-03
Actual
F V 2002-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-05
40
31
28
30
99%
99%
99%
99%
1,750
1,329
1,000
1,200
11
10
11
11
4
4
4
4
3
3
3
3
30
42
54
50
4
4
4
3
9
11
it
11
75%
80%
85%
90%
�`ww�. t4 �c'y „h Y•` ug .�•
f
�O ,
DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY
Program: City Attorney Funding Source: General Fund
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance $ 750,311 $ 771,195 $ 915,000 $ 850,000
Capital Outlay
Total $ 750,311 $ 771,195 $ 915,000 $ 850,000
DEPARTMENT: CITY ATTORNEY
PROGRAM: CITY ATTORNEY
MISSION: The City Attorney serves as legal advisor to the City Council, City Manager, and the
various City departments, commissions, committees, and boards. The City Attorney
prepares and approves for legality the majority of proposed City ordinances,
resolutions, contracts, and other legal documents. The City Attorney also represents
the City in all litigation.
GOAL1: PROVIDE SOUND LEGAL COUNSEL TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY
MANAGER, AND CITY STAFF, COMMISSIONS, COMMITTEES AND BOARDS
ON ALL MATTERS CONCERNING THE CITY AND ADMINISTRATION OF CITY
POLICY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Render legal advice on all City matters to Council and staff in a manner that permits
timely and appropriate action
➢ Review and advise staff in a timely manner on court decisions and new laws that affect
City operations
➢ Advise and represent the City on litigation matters in a complete and timely fashion
➢ Review all ordinances, resolutions, contracts and agreements in a complete and timely
manner
CITY CLERK/
DIRECTOR OF SUPPORT SERVICES
Susan W. Jones
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
OF SUPPORT SERVICES
Michaela Ballreich
CITY CLERK II SUPPORT
II SERVICES
Council Support Copy Center/Mail Room
Elections Reception Services
Legislative History
Public Information
Records Management
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
Program: City Clerk
Expenditure Summa
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Total
Personnel Allocation
City Clerk/Director of Support Services
Deputy Director of Support Services
Senior Records Coordinator
Administrative Assistant
Minute Clerk
Office Specialist
Department Total
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
$ 432,849
$ 518,806
$ 562,440
$ 592,700
265,014
243,694
394,345
319,300
22,637
$ 720,500
$ 762,500
$ 956,785
$ 912,000
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
0.00
1.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
7.00
0.00
7.00
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
PROGRAM: CITY CLERK
MISSION: To compile and maintain the official records of the City and to make them readily
accessible to all; to conduct fair and impartial municipal elections; to prepare, certify,
and/or adhere to public notice requirements with regard to legal documents,
ordinances, resolutions, public hearings, etc.; to codify and disseminate the City's
Municipal Code; to promote public awareness of the processes of government; to
provide meeting, administrative, and legislative support to the Mayor, City
Councilmembers, and its Commissions and Committees.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Electronically scanned all agendas, minutes, resolutions and ordinances as adopted
Electronically scanned approximately 23,000 large size maps
• Held the City's sixth annual Voter Registration Drive
• Provided appropriate support of the timely processing of City documents to the City
Council, City staff and the community
• Adopted and implemented a newly revised Citywide records retention schedule
• Successfully conducted 2003 Municipal Election
• Provided information on community and City events on the local cable television
channel, to be broadcast during the intermissions at City Council meetings
• Prepared a comprehensive candidates election manual
GOAL 1: PROVIDE APPROPRIATE SUPPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL, CITY STAFF,
AND THE COMMUNITY REGARDING THE TIMELY PROCESSING OF CITY
DOCUMENTS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Prepare and distribute agenda packets to the City Council at least 72 hours prior to all
meetings
➢ Record, transcribe, and finalize meeting minutes in a timely manner for City Council,
Temecula Community Services District, Redevelopment Agency, Temecula Public
Financing Agency, Planning Commission, Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and the
Old Town Local Review Board
➢ Provide timely processing of ordinances and resolutions within one week of adoption
➢ Process contracts and agreements within ten days of City Council action
GOAL 2: DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT A YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Work in conjunction with the school district to select 20 senior advanced placement
government students to participate in the program
➢ Establish a job shadow for City Council Members, Department Directors and key staff
➢ Develop a "mock" City Council Meeting for students to participate as their designated
City official
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
GOAL 3: ADMINISTER A COMPREHENSIVE RECORDS MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
➢ Continue the scanning of permanent records such as City Council Agendas, minutes,
resolutions, ordinances, and agenda packets immediately upon adoption
➢ Conduct training on the newly adopted comprehensive City of Temecula retention and
the usage of Laserfiche
➢ Ensure proper implementation of technology to ensure efficient records retrieval and
archiving
➢ Continue to provide excellent customer service by handling all records requests within a
ten day period
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Average time for distribution of Council
packets before meetings 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours 96 hours
Average time to finalize meeting minutes 4 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks 4 weeks
Average processing of ordinances and
resolutions from time of adoption 6 days 6 days 6 days 6 days
Average processing of contracts from time of
City Council action 8 days 6 days 8 days 6 days
DEPARTMENT: CITY CLERK
PROGRAM: SUPPORT SERVICES
MISSION: The Support Services Fund is the cost center for central duplicating services, mailroom
and switchboard services, receiving, and copy equipment maintenance for City Hall.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Networked copiers throughout City Hall
• Implemented procedures that all copy/fax purchases, whether internally or at outside
facilities, are funneled through Central Services
GOAL 1: ENSURE COST EFFECTIVENESS STANDARDS ARE UTILIZED WHEN
PURCHASING CENTRAL SERVICES PRODUCTS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Explore purchasing options such as "piggybacking" on County/State contracts, the
internet, and the use of existing vendors
➢ Renegotiate existing copier contract to include added equipment needs
GOAL2: PROVIDE TIMELY, HIGH QUALITY, AND EFFICIENT DUPLICATING/POSTAL
SERVICES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain current duplicating equipment, through the maintenance agreement, at an
optimal functioning level and update technology
➢ Ensure staff is adequately trained on associated functions
GOAL 3: PROVIDE THE UTMOST CUSTOMER SERVICE AT THE RECEPTION DESK
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Ensure appropriate staffing and cross training
➢ Obtain information regarding the number of walk-in traffic during the months of April,
July, November to determine peak seasonal needs/traffic/etc.
COST ALLOCATION:
Charges to departments are calculated based on the number of color and regular copies made
by each department, as well as on the number of on -site personnel for each department
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Number of walk-in traffic N/A N/A N/A 23,000
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
Genie Roberts
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR
Jason Simpson
FINANCE
OPERATIONS
Accounts Payable
Accounts Receivable
FINANCE
MANAGEMENT
Operating Budget
Financial Reporting
Payroll Cash & Investments
General Ledger Contract Administration
Maintenance Debt Financing
Community Facilities
FINANCE SUPPORT SERVICES
Gus Papagolos
Capital Improvement
Program Budget
Risk Management
Purchasing
Business Licensing
Cashiering
Grant Administration
DEPARTMENT:
FINANCE
Program: Finance
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 787,812
$ 973,461
$ 1,134,380
$ 1,269,500
Operations & Maintenance
314,073
437,506
563,180
460,400
Capital Outlay
2,085
5,500
$ 1,103,970
$ 1,410,967
$ 1,703,060
$ 1,729,900
Authorized
Authorized
Personnel Allocation
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
Director of Finance
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Finance Director
1.00
0.00
1.00
Fiscal Services Manager
0.75
0.00
0.75
Revenue Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Accountant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Debt Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Accountant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
0.75
0.00
0.75
Accounting Specialist
3.00
0.00
3.00
Purchasing Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Business License Specialist/Cashier
1.00
0.00
1.00
Accounting Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Department Total 14.00 0.00 14.00
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
PROGRAM: FINANCE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT
MISSION: The Finance Operations and Management Program is responsible for managing the
City's financial operations in accordance with established fiscal policies. Primary
responsibilities include cash and investment management, financial reporting,
preparation of the Annual Operating Budget, internal audit, payroll, accounts payable
and receivable, financial oversight, and administration of all City funds and accounts.
Additionally, the department administers the public safety contracts of police and fire.
2003-04 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Received awards from the California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO)
and Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) for excellence in financial
reporting for the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
• Received awards from CSMFO and GFOA for excellence in operational budgeting for
the City's FY 2003-04 Annual Operating Budget
• Completed two Community Facility Districts and an Assessment District financing
Completed office remodel to improve space utilization and add needed storage capacity
GOAL1: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE AND METICULOUS GENERAL ACCOUNTING
SYSTEMS TO ENSURE THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAINTAINS A SOUND
FINANCIAL CONDITION
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Manage the investment portfolio with the safety of principal as the primary objective and
return on investment as the secondary objective, while maintaining liquidity to meet the
City's obligations
➢ Provide timely and accurate check runs for accounts payable and processing of payroll
➢ Provide timely and accurate financial reports, including the CAFR to the decision makers
and operating departments
➢ Continue to prepare the CAFR, obtain an unqualified audit opinion, and comply with the
CSMFO and GFOA award criteria
GOAL2: PROVIDE A SOUND FINANCIAL PLAN FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE
BUDGET PROCESS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Continue to utilize the five-year financial plan to determine the future impact of
proposed programs and capital improvement projects to ensure long term fiscal stability
➢ Prepare an Annual Operating Budget which complies with the CSMFO and GFOA
award criteria
GOAL3: PROVIDE CONTRACT COORDINATION AND OVERSIGHT OF THE CITY'S
POLICE AND FIRE SERVICES CONTRACTS WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Negotiate annual service contracts that provide the highest level of services to the City
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Percentage of bank reconciliations performed
before the close of the subsequent month
Invoices processed per year
Payroll checks/direct deposits processed per
year
CSMFO and GFOA award winning CAFR
documents prepared with unqualified opinions
Management letter comments as a result of
City's annual audit
CSMFO and GFOA award winning operating
budgets prepared
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
100%
100%
100%
100%
13,500
13,511
14,800
14,500
5,800
5,793
5,850
6,150
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
PROGRAM: FINANCE SUPPORT SERVICES
MISSION: The Finance Support Services Program is responsible for the preparation of the Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget document, risk management, purchasing, business
licensing, grant administration, and other Finance Support related projects.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Received the award for excellence in Capital budgeting from the California Society of
Municipal Finance Offices (CSMFO) for the 2004-2008 CIP budget
• Renewed the City's property and liability insurance policies with a smaller than
anticipated premium increase
• Improved the Business License database tracking of Riverside County certificate
requirements for specialized businesses
GOAL 1: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP)
FOR THE CITY THROUGH THE CIP BUDGET PROCESS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Prepare a CIP budget document in accordance with the CSMFO award criteria
➢ Work collaboratively with each department individually and in workshops to ensure
completeness and consistency throughout the CIP process in accordance with City
Council direction
GOAL 2: MINIMIZE CITY LIABILITY THROUGH THE PROPER ADMINISTRATION OF
THE RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct quarterly and as -needed field inspections of right-of-way and parks with the
insurance carrier's loss control administrator
➢ Conduct a preliminary review of all claims within ten calendar days of receipt
➢ Actively participate in monthly Safety Committee meetings
➢ Update the Risk Management Policy and Safety Manuals
GOAL3: ENSURE A CUSTOMER SERVICE ORIENTED PURCHASING OPERATION
WHICH PROVIDES SUPPORT FOR ALL CITY PURCHASES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Process 90% of all purchase requests within 48 hours of receipt
➢ Use California Multiple Award Schedules to streamline the purchasing time line and take
advantage of competitive pricing
➢ Frequently update and train staff on contract requirements for professional services,
maintenance and construction agreements
➢ Assist staff in the preparation and review of Requests for Proposals (RFP) and Requests
for Qualifications (RFQ)
DEPARTMENT: FINANCE
GOAL4: PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE BUSINESS LICENSE PROGRAM WHICH
ENCOURAGES 100% PARTICIPATION BY CITY BUSINESSES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Process 90% of all new license applications within five working days
➢ Process 95% of all business license renewals by February 28th each year
➢ Coordinate administrative action with Code Enforcement for businesses that do not have
an active Business License
➢ Quarterly review business license and sales tax data to identify businesses that do not
have a sales permit number
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of business licenses issued
6,000
6,400
6,000
7,100
Percent of business license applications
processed within 5 working days
95%
95%
95%
95%
Percent of business license renewals
processed by February 29th
95%
97%
95%
95%
Number of purchase orders processed
2,800
2,700
2,800
3,200
Percent of purchase orders processed within
48 hours of receipt
98%
98%
98%
98%
Percent of claims processed within 10 days of
receipt
100%
100%
100%
100%
--
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
Debbie Ubnoske
DEPUTY
CITY MANAGER
Gary Thornhill
BUILDING & SAFETY
Tonv Elmo
CURRENT
ADVANCE
ADMINISTRATIVE
PLANNING
PLANNING
SERVICES11
L
Development Review
General Plan
Agency Review
Public Information
Ordinance Development
Code Enforcement
CEQA Management
CEQA Management
Development Processing
Public Information
BUILDING
SERVICES
Plan Review Processing
Plan Review
Permit Issuance
Inspection Services
DEPUTY DIRECTOR
PUBLIC WORKS
Ron Parks
LAND
DEVELOPMENT
Permits
Plan Checks
Map Recordation
Development Inspection
Plan Review
Program: Planning*
Expenditure Summary
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Funding Source:
Actual Actual
General Fund
Budgeted
Proposed
Personnel $ 1,709,997 $ 1,987,698 $ 2,056,205 $ 2,278,700
Operations & Maintenance 714,829 926,365 992,180 783,090
Capital Outlay 43,144 500
$ 2,467,970 $ 2,914,063 $ 3,048,885 $ 3,061,790
*GIS as of FY 03-04 will be combined with Information Systems in the Internal Service Fund.
Program: Building and Safety
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 1,294,083
$ 1,424,979
$ 1,819,422
$ 1,960,940
Operations & Maintenance
445,723
601,906
658,081
631,900
Capital Outlay
18,219
5,000
$ 1,758,025
$ 2,026,886
$ 2,482,503
$ 2,592,840
Program: Land Development
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 901,066
$ 1,135,666
$ 1,406,240
$ 1,569,900
Operations & Maintenance
200,235
308,349
418,885
393,400
Capital Outlay
$ 1,101,301 $ 1,444,014 $ 1,825,125 $ 1,963,300
DEPARTMENT:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Authorized
Authorized
Personnel Allocation
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
PLANNING
Deputy City Manager
1.00
0.00
1.00
Director of Planning
1.00
0.00
1.00
Principal Planner
3.00
0.00
3.00
Senior Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Associate Planner
6.00
0.00
6.00
Development Processing Coordinator
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer II
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Planner
1.00
0.00
1.00
Code Enforcement Officer I
2.00
0.00
2.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
2.00
0.00
2.00
Office Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Department Total
22.00
0.00
22.00
BUILDING & SAFETY
Director of Building and Safety
1.00
0.00
1.00
Deputy Building Official
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
1.00
Plan Checker / Building Inspector
1.00
0.00
1.00
Building Inspector Il
7.00
1.00
8.00
Building Inspector III
1.00
0.00
1.00
Community Development Technician
4.00
0.00
4.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
2.00
0.00
2.00
Department Total
20.00
1.00
21.00
LAND DEVELOPMENT
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.30
0.00
0.30
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.30
0.00
0.30
Senior Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Associate Engineer
3.00
0.00
3.00
Special Projects Associate Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Senior Public Works Inspector
2.00
0.00
2.00
Assistant Engineer
3.00
0.00
3.00
Junior Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Engineering Tech III
1.00
0.00
1.00
Public Works Inspector
1.50
0.00
1.50
Administrative Assistant
0.25
0.00
0.25
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
0.33
1.00
1.33
Department Total
15.68
1.00
16.68
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM: CURRENT PLANNING
MISSION: The Current Planning Program provides a variety of planning services to the
community, including reviewing and processing of development proposals for
conformance with City policies and regulations and implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In addition, staff provides support to the Planning
Commission and City Council and assists the general public and development
applicants regarding planning information and application processing.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Processed approximately 35% more public hearing cases than the previous fiscal year
• Streamlined the development review process by improving computerized project
tracking capability and equalizing workload distribution
• Revised all land development application forms to simplify process and provide
customer information on the development review process
GOAL 1: MAINTAIN A HIGH LEVEL OF CUSTOMER SERVICE
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Practice and refine the recently modified development process for all new planning
applications including a quarterly review workshop with all affected departments
➢ Evaluate revisions to all planning application forms and submittal requirements by the
end of the 2004-05 fiscal year
➢ Track response of applicant satisfaction surveys on an ongoing basis including a
quarterly assessment/strategy session to include all current planning staff
GOAL 2: CLARIFY THE CITY'S DESIGN OBJECTIVES/REVIEW PROCESS TO THE
COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Complete update of design guidelines document by the end of the 2004-05 fiscal year
➢ Update the department website with revised application forms and submittal
requirements by the end of the 2004-05 fiscal year
➢ Develop an electronic copy of the application forms and design guidelines and make
compact discs available for the public
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Number of public hearing cases submitted 80 46 62 54
Number of pre -application meetings
scheduled 10 20 30 25
Number of "fast track" projects 2 2 3 3
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM: ADVANCE PLANNING/SPECIAL PROJECTS
MISSION: The Advance Planning and Special Projects Program is responsible for a variety of
long-range planning issues affecting the community, including implementation and
maintenance of the City's General Plan and Municipal Code; preparation of special
land use studies; and utilization of vital demographic and geophysical information.
Additionally, this program provides support services to other departments/agencies,
monitors various regional agencies and programs, and develops special projects in
response to City Council direction.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Completed draft documents for seven of ten General Plan Elements
Completed the update of the Old Town Specific Plan
• Processed fourteen environmental reviews
Continued to review major County development project applications in the City's sphere
of influence for consistency with local goals and regional needs
• Participated in regional meetings that affect the City and its residents
Completed revised User Fee Study for the department
GOAL 1: UPDATE AND MAINTAIN THE GENERAL PLAN AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
TO ENSURE THE CONTINUED PROVISION OF ACCURATE GUIDANCE AND
DIRECTION FOR PRIVATE DEVELOPMENT, AS WELL AS LOCAL PROGRAMS
AND PLANNING ACTIVITIES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Complete the comprehensive update of the General Plan
➢ Amend the development code and official zoning map to conform to the updated General
Plan
GOAL2: CONTINUE TO REPRESENT AND PURSUE CITY INTERESTS ON VARIOUS
REGIONAL AND INTER -JURISDICTIONAL ISSUES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Actively participate in regional planning activities
GOAL 3: CONDUCT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW FOR CITY PROJECTS AND REGIONAL
PROJECTS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Work with the Community Services Department, Public Works Department, and project
consultants to ensure compliance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) for projects
having Federal, State, local, or regional jurisdiction and/or funding
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM: CODE ENFORCEMENT/ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIVISION
MISSION: The Code Enforcement/Administrative Services Division provides a variety of planning
services to the community, including; reviewing development proposals; monitoring
regional agencies and programs; and coordinating with outside agencies to protect the
quality of life within the City of Temecula. In addition, this Division is tasked with
implementing and managing an effective code enforcement program. This Division also
provides administrative staff support for the Community Development Department and
aides in the coordination of development services with the public.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Successful adoption of the Western Riverside County Multi -Species Habitat
Conservation Plan Implementation Agreement, Joint Powers Authority, and Habitat
Conservation Fee Ordinance
• Successful completion of the annual Citywide weed abatement program with the
inspection of 800 parcels and forced abatement of 80 parcels
• Initiated annual inspections of local businesses for compliance with proper storage of
graffiti implements
• Secured approximately $16,000 in revenue from the Abandoned Vehicle Abatement
program
• Provided over 4,000 code enforcement field inspections and a total of 13,482 code
enforcement actions
GOAL 1: ENSURE THAT THE CITY'S INTERESTS ARE REPRESENTED ON THE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY INTEGRATED PROJECT (RCIP) AND MONITOR
DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY ADJACENT TO AND WITHIN THE CITY'S SPHERE
OFINFLUENCE
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Represent the City's interests and continue to participate in the Riverside County
Integrated Project, Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and Community
Environmental Transportation Acceptability Process
➢ Provide comprehensive research, written comments, and present public testimony on
projects and issues within the County of Riverside, the City of Murrieta and numerous
agencies and special districts that might affect the quality of life in Temecula
➢ Coordinate inter -governmental relations between the City of Temecula, the County of
Riverside, and local jurisdictions
GOAL2: ENSURE A SAFE, DECENT AND ATTRACTIVE ENVIRONMENT FOR
RESIDENTS, BUSINESSES AND VISITORS AND PRESERVE AND UPGRADE
THE CITY'S HOUSING AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain a three-day response time for addressing citizen generated concerns on
housing, health and safety, land use, public nuisance, animal control, and vector control
matters
➢ Contact reporting party at the close of each case
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GOAL 3: PROVIDE AN EFFECTIVE CITYWIDE WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Manage the commencement of annual weed abatement activities Citywide by May 1 and
complete the program activities in a timely manner
➢ Monitor the completion of weed abatement activities and obtain City Council
confirmation of abatement cost assessments for timely recording on the following year's
property tax rolls
➢ Ensure Code Enforcement Officers are allocated time to respond to public inquiries
GOAL4: MAINTAIN A RESPONSIVE PROGRAM FOR CONTROL OF VECTOR
NUISANCES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide resource information to public within 24 hours of receipt for all citizen concerns
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Code Enforcement concerns responded to
within three working days 2,568 3,045 2,815 3,080
Percent of complaints contacted at the
close of cases 100% 99% 100% 100%
Percent of weed abatement activities
commenced by May 1 100% 100% 100% 100%
Percent of resource information made
available to the public within 24 hours 100% 99% 100% 100%
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM: BUILDING SERVICES
MISSION: The Building Services Program is responsible for enforcing the City's Building and
Safety codes; performing plan checks on construction documentation to ensure that
project proposals meet City codes; distributing plans for review by other agencies or
City departments; issuing building permits; completing final inspections; and issuing
certificates of occupancy. The program also performs special inspections; implements
certain state laws such as the California Disabled Access Regulations; is responsible for
updating Building and Fire codes required by the State of California; provides guidance
to the general public and development community regarding the Uniform Building
Codes and project applications; and is responsible for inspections of private
development projects, construction within the public right-of-way exclusive of capital
projects, and erosion control enforcement.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Hosted two residential and one commercial developers' workshops
• Established an "express permits desk" to expedite issuance of permits for water heaters,
patio covers, and walls
• Established "Builder's Corner", a do-it-yourself project series on the City's website
• Performed over 51,000 inspections of which 4,300 were either unscheduled or
unrequested
• Issued 748,821 square feet of commercial permits for new construction
• Issued 754 and finalized 1,128 residential home permits
• Established individual construction program meetings with building owners/contractors
• Implemented concurrent Building and Fire Department plan reviews resulting in shorter
processing time in approving projects for permit issuance
GOAL 1: PROVIDE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVIEW FOR COMPLIANCE WITH
FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCALLY MANDATED BUILDING RELATED CODES
FOR ALL NEW AND REMODEL PERMIT APPLICATIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide initial plan review comments and conditions within 10-12 working days from
the date of submittal
➢ Provide complete in-house plan review on minor tenant improvements, non-structural
additions and remodels, and permit applications
➢ Provide review of resubmitted plans in a 5 to 7 working day period
GOAL 2: ENSURE THE TIMELY ISSUANCE OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Enhance the City's permit issuance and tracking software by implementing workflow to
increase efficiency in the processing and issuance of building related permits
➢ Increase efficiency at the counter by processing multiple permits
➢ Utilize appointments for the issuance of tract and multiple permits
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
GOAL 3: PERFORM EFFICIENT AND TIMELY BUILDING INSPECTIONS FOR ALL
TYPES OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE CITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Respond to inspection requests within 24 hours of receipt
➢ Continue inspection teams and areas to develop familiarity with product and developer
personnel, resulting in increased inspection efficiency and decreased travel time
➢ Conduct progress meetings to provide contractors with clear expectations of our process
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Percent of initial plan reviews within 12
working days
Percent of residential plan re -reviews within 5
to 7 working days
Percent of commercial plan re -reviews within
7 to 10 working days
Building related permits issued
Percent of combination building inspections
performed within 24 hours
Combination building inspections performed
Number of unrequested "bonus" inspections
performed
Number of Certificate of Occupancy
inspections performed
Number of workshops provided for active
developers within the City
Projected
FV 2002-03
Actual
FV 2002-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-05
98%
100%
100%
100%
98%
98%
100%
100%
98%
98%
100%
100%
3,000
3,438
4,000
4,600
100%
100%
100%
100%
50,000
49,969
60,000
60,000
500
0
1,500
2,500
193
72
225
260
3
2
3
3
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
PROGRAM: LAND DEVELOPMENT
MISSION: The Land Development Division provides a variety of public services related to
engineering, review and construction observation to ensure all private land
development and subdivision activity with the city is designed and completed to the
highest of public standards.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Processed residential and commercial development subdivision maps, encroachment and
grading permits, boundary adjustments, street improvements and field inspections
• Completed review of maps and plans for Harveston Specific Plan phases I and II; Wolf
Creek Specific Plan phase I and the Roripaugh Ranch infrastructure facilities
• Complete Citywide catch basin and storm drain plotting into GIS program
• Improved public internet access by scanning engineering maps, improvement plans and
related ordinances
• Implemented, inspected, and enforced compliance of NPDES and FEMA review and
oversight program
• Completed the Underground Utility Ordinance
GOAL1: ENSURE THAT ALL PRIVATE LAND DEVELOPMENT AND SUBDIVISION
ACTIVITIES ARE COMPLETED TO THE HIGHEST OF STANDARDS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Increase plan check and review capabilities by implementing in-house surveying,
mapping and monumentation services
➢ Ensure development projects are reviewed, conditioned and approved in compliance with
local, state and federal policies and regulations
➢ Work in partnership with other City departments and outside agencies to ensure all
development related issues are addressed
➢ Ensure construction compliance with the approved plans through superior inspection
observation services to the community
➢ Provide review, oversight and public education relating to the implementation of the
NPDES and FEMA programs
GOAL2: PROVIDE THE HIGHEST LEVEL OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE AND
EXCEPTIONAL CUSTOMER SERVICE RELATED TO LONG-TERM GROWTH
AND LAND DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Streamline the application process by implementing Permits Plus Work Flow program
➢ Improve and track plan check and inspection reports by implementing the Crystal
Reports program
➢ Increase accessibility to all engineering plans by continuing to scan/catalog these
documents into LaserFiche
➢ Turn around development review plan checks with three weeks of the first complete
project submittal and subsequent plan checks within two weeks of complete submittal
➢ Turn around encroachment and use permits within one week of complete application
DEPARTMENT: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-0S
Documents scanned into LaserFiche
N/A
N/A
2,500
3,000
Tract/Parcel maps reviewed
N/A
29
40
40
Improvement plans reviewed
N/A
637
750
750
Encroachments/use permits issued
N/A
202
300
350
Permit inspection requests within 24 hours
100%
100%
100%
100%
NPDES compliance inspections
N/A
N/A
400
600
First plan check turnaround time
3 weeks
3 weeks
3 weeks
3 weeks
Subsequent plan checks turnaround time
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
Map changes turnaround time
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
Development review turnaround time
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
2 weeks
Use permits turnaround time
I week
1 weeks
1 week
I week
MAINTENANCE
Pavement Management
Signing/Striping
Tree Trimming
Weed Abatement
Drainage Channels/
Catch Basins
Special Events
Graffiti Removal
Contract Administration
Public Service Requests
DIRECTOR OF
PUBLIC WORKS/
CITY ENGINEER
Bill Hughes
OF PUBLIC WORKS
Ron Parks
TRAFFIC _ SPECIAL CAPITAL PROJECTS 11 11 LAND
ENGINEERING PROJECTS 11 11 ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPM
Commission
Census
Device Inventory
Surveys
Signal Maintenance
Signal Timing
Analysis Investigation
Service Requests
Committees
FEMA Projects
Non-CIP Design Projects
Assessment/CIP Districts
Development Review
Other Agency Review
Project Development
Grant Application
Plans & Specifications
Public Bidding
Construction Management
Construction Inspection
*Detail information for the Land Development program is included in the Community Development Department
Checks
Recordation
eIopment Inspection
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
Program: Public Works Funding Source: General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 1,000,823
$ 1,267,079
$ 1,597,845
$ 1,808,600
Operations & Maintenance
2,548,008
2,578,798
3,846,018
3,494,700
Capital Outlay
132,551
19,695
12,500
$ 3,681,382
$ 3,845,877
$ 5,463,558
$ 5,315,800
Program: CIP Administration
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 1,100,866
$ 1,415,336
$ 1,739,495
$ 2,007,600
Operations & Maintenance
234,590
348,533
354,818
350,700
Capital Outlay
6,014
7,569
$ 1,335,456
$ 1,769,883
$ 2,101,882
$ 2,358,300
Authorized
Authorized
Personnel Allocation
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
PUBLIC WORKS
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.40
0.00
0.40
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.40
0.00
0.40
Principal Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Associate Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Maintenance Superintendent
1.00
0.00
1.00
Assistant Engineer
1.00
0.00
1.00
Junior Engineer
0.50
0.00
0.50
Maintenance Supervisor
1.00
0.00
1.00
Management Analyst
0.50
0.00
0.50
Landscape Inspector
0.25
0.00
0.25
Administrative Assistant
0.50
0.00
0.50
Senior Signal Technician
1.00
0.00
1.00
Lead Maintenance Worker
4.00
0.00
4.00
Maintenance Worker
5.00
0.00
5.00
Office Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
Office Assistant
1.33
0.00
1.33
Total
19.88
0.00
19.88
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
PUBLIC WORKS - CIP ADMINISTRATION
Director of Public Works/City Engineer
0.30
Deputy Director of Public Works
0.30
Principal Engineer
2.00
Senior Engineer
1.00
Associate Engineer
4.00
Property Agent
1.00
Senior Public Works Inspector
2.00
Assistant Engineer
3.00
Management Analyst
0.50
CIP Specialist
0.75
Public Works Inspector
0.50
Administrative Assistant
0.25
Office Specialist
1.00
Office Assistant
0.34
Total 16.94
0.00
0.30
0.00
0.30
0.00
2.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
4.00
0.00
1.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.75
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.25
0.00
1.00
0.00
0.34
0.00 16.94
Dpartment Total 36.92 0.00 36.82
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAM: MAINTENANCE
MISSION: The Maintenance Program is responsible for all maintenance activities associated with
the City's streets, drainage facilities, traffic control devices, street trees and parkways,
graffiti removal, weed abatement, stenciling/striping, pothole patching, and service
order requests.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Planted over 150 new street trees through the "Trees for Temecula" program
• Provided support to City sponsored events
Provided emergency response through its after hours call -out program
Maintained 375 centerline miles of public right-of-way, including related drainage
systems, tree trimming, graffiti removal, and weed abatement
Completed 15,000 square feet of pavement repairs and slurry sealing of streets
Cleaned and checked 2,500 catch basins
GOAL 1: PROVIDE A RESPONSIVE AND COMPREHENSIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
TO MEET THE NEEDS OF THE CITIZENS AND ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY
OBJECTIVES: ➢
Respond to all service order requests within a 24-hour period
➢
Ensure service requests requiring emergency repairs are completed within 48-hours
➢
Remove graffiti within a 24-hour period
➢
Implement a Pavement Management System that addresses a minimum of 85% of all
pavement projects
➢
Re -stencil Citywide street legends twice per year
➢
Continue improvement of routine and major maintenance programs
➢
Monitor and improve the storm drain systems in compliance with the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
➢
Upgrade response and field procedures for emergency situations
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of service order responses
1,500
1,500
500
650
Number of legends stenciled
6,000
3,000
3,000
4,500
Number of street signs replaced
500
700
500
1,000
Square feet of graffiti removed
28,000
45,000
30,000
50,000
Square feet of sidewalks/curb/gutters repaired
20,000
8,000
20,000
20,000
Miles of City streets slurry sealed
18
14
18
18
Miles of street trees planted
N/A
532
200
300
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAM- TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
MISSION: The Traffic Engineering Program is responsible for all daily traffic related operations
and safety issues as well as well as future transportation planning and circulation
management plans. This program is responsible for the collection and analysis of traffic
volumes, accident reports, speed studies, traffic device inventories, maintenance and
timing of existing traffic signals, and establishing future traffic signal priorities.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Developed Citywide Master Plan for the prioritization and installation of Closed Circuit
Television (CCTV) cameras and communication systems
• Completed plans for the installation of traffic signal interconnect facilities on Margarita
Road from Rancho California Road to Pio Pico Road, completing the Margarita Road
interconnect system between Winchester Road and State Route 79 South
• Monitored traffic signal synchronization conditions on City's arterials from City Hall
and implemented temporary traffic signal timing to modify signal operation in the event
of traffic incidents and provided response assistance to the Police and Public Works
Departments through CCTV cameras
• Implemented geometric improvements at various locations to mitigate traffic circulation
• Installed traffic signals and multi -way stop signs at various locations to improve
intersection safety
• Collected traffic data at numerous intersections to improve traffic signal coordination
and improve traffic circulation along the City's major arterials
• Provided technical assistance for special events to ensure mitigation measures were
implemented to enhance safety and traffic circulation
• Conducted traffic investigations related to citizen concerns and implemented appropriate
action
GOAL 1: CONTINUE TO EXPAND THE CITY'S INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION
SYSTEM (ITS) NETWORK
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Install additional CCTY cameras to monitor traffic conditions and signal operations on
the City's major arterials to improve circulation
➢ Develop traffic signal timing plans that will respond to congestion and provide incident
management along the City's arterial corridors
GOAL 2: PROVIDE AN EXCEPTIONAL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Enhance the responsiveness to traffic signal operation issues
➢ Conduct routine maintenance and identify preventative measures
➢ Monitor the city's intersections and respond to traffic congestion issues in a timely
manner
➢ Maintain the City's Traffic Signal System to ensure that traffic signals and
synchronization system are operating properly and providing optimal circulation
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
GOAL3: PROACTIVELY MITIGATE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION ISSUES
THROUGH TRANSPORTATION PLANNING AND REVIEW PROCESS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Review all development projects, site plans and traffic impact studies to asses private
development impacts and identify mitigation measures
➢ Develop a Citywide transportation planning model and software program to identify
roadway system impacts caused by new development
➢ Maintain Citywide traffic census program to identify traffic circulation patterns and
develop growth management strategies
GOAL 4: ENSURE OPTIMAL TRAFFIC CIRCULATION THROUGHOUT THE CITY BY
MONITORING CONDITIONS AND IDENTIFYING AREAS OF CONCERN
➢ Conduct timely investigation of traffic incidents to identify preventative measures
➢ Maintain the City's Traffic Signal System to ensure the traffic signals and
synchronization systems are operating properly and providing optimal circulation
➢ Monitor City activities and special events to ensure public and traffic safety mitigation
measures are implemented
➢ Develop and implement traffic signal coordination timing plans as necessary to ensure
progression along the City's major arterials
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FV 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Citizen generated traffic investigations
N/A
N/A
65
70
Work orders resulting from investigations
N/A
N/A
62
60
Days to complete traffic investigations
10
10
10
10
Number of traffic/construction plans reviewed
N/A
N/A
360
400
Days to complete plan reviews
10
5
10
10
Number of traffic census locations monitored
N/A
N/A
121
121
Number of traffic signals installed
N/A
N/A
4
5
Traffic signals reviewed for timing
100%
100%
100%
100%
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAM: ADMINISTRATION AND SPECIAL PROJECTS
MISSION: The Administration and Special Projects Program is responsible for assisting all Public
Works Divisions in meeting performance goals and objectives by fostering an
organizational environment that encourages a commitment to teamwork. This Division
provides for the coordination with other agencies and organization involved in
transportation, flood control, sanitary sewer, water distribution, State/Federal funding
opportunities, air quality, and congestion management. The Division also tracts
budgets, and coordinates all programs within the Public Works Department.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Obtained $100,000 in SB 821 funding to design the multi -purpose trail under crossing at
Santa Gertrudis Creek and Margarita Road
• Obtained additional $89,000 in California Energy Commission funding to install battery
backup systems for 37 designated LED signalized traffic systems
• Completed the ordinance and procedure manual for Grading, Erosion and Sediment
Control
• Applied for $3.92 million in Highway Bridge Replacement and Rehabilitation Program
(HBRRP) funding for the replacement of the Main Street Bridge
• Applied for $1.8 million in State Bicycle Transportation Account funding for the Santa
Gertrudis Creek Bicycle/Trail Extension and Interconnect Project
• Applied for $425,500 in Safe Routes to School Program funding for the Santa Gertrudis
Pedestrian/Bicycle Bridge over crossing
• Applied for $100,000 in California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) Tire
Track and other Recreational Surfacing grant funding for artificial playing fields for the
future Temecula Sports Complex
• Updated the City's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) Program pursuant to the
Federal Department of Transportation Regulations
GOAL1: MAINTAIN ACTIVE PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL GROUPS TO ENSURE
COMPLIANCE WITH FEDERAL AND STATE MANDATES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Attend monthly Riverside County Transportation Technical Advisory Committee and
Western Regional Council of Governments Technical Advisory Committee to ensure
participation in all federal grant programs
➢ Coordinate with the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) in the
administration of RTIP funding for Public Works projects
➢ Communicate with federal agencies to ensure conformance with federally mandated
regional policies
➢ Participate in the Water Planning Task Force, various Santa margarita Watershed groups,
and the Joint Temecula/Murrieta Traffic Committee
➢ Coordinate with the Western Riverside Council of Governments concerning the
implementation and monitoring of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
GOAL2: PROVIDE A CENTRALIZED SUPPORT CENTER TO ENSURE THE EFFICIENT
ADMINISTRATION OF ALL PUBLIC WORKS FUNCTIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide leadership by representing various programs to the public, City Council,
department heads and other public agencies
➢ Evaluate program policies and procedures to ensure operational plan meets stated goals
and refine and articulate the department vision and values
➢ Process request for information within 72 hours
➢ Negotiate and close property acquisitions, easements and agreements for capital projects
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Council agendas prepared/processed
N/A
161
200
225
Number of contracts/agreements awarded
N/A
N/A
50
65
Number of contracts/agreements administered
N.A
N/A
50
65
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
PROGRAM: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION
MISSION: The Capital Improvement Program provides high quality construction engineering and
management for the coordination, development and implementation of projects
identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program at the scheduled time, within the
approved budget, and with minimal disruptions and inconvenience to the public.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Completed the pavement rehabilitation on Rancho California Road
• Completed the widening of westbound Rancho California Road at Ynez Road
• Completed improvement in the John Warner Assessment District
• Completed the widening of the Rancho California Road Bridge over Murrieta Creek
Broke ground on the Old Town Community Theater Project
• Broke ground on Phase II of the Pechanga Parkway Wolf Creek Channel Improvements
Completed a Value Analysis Study for the French Valley Parkway Interchange Project
• Participated in the first Accelerated Construction Technology Transfer (ACTT)
workshop in California (French Valley Parkway Interchange Project)
GOAL1: PROVIDE TIMELY DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF CIRCULATION,
INFRASTRUCTURE, COMMUNITY SERVICES AND REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY PROJECTS IDENTIFIED IN THE CITY'S ADOPTED CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTPROGRAM
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Update the Capital Improvement Program annually, including a comprehensive review
of projects; initial cost estimates based on available and projected revenues; project
timeliness; and project prioritization
➢ Design and construct proposed projects within funding and time guidelines as set forth in
the Capital Improvement Program document
GOAL 2: PROVIDE A TURNKEY CONTRACT MANAGEMENT OPERATION FROM
PREPARING REQUESTS FOR PROPOSALS TO CONTRACT CLOSEOUT
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Ensure timely and thorough project initiation, design, and complete all associated tasks
➢ Ensure compliance with all requirements of the public bidding process
➢ Provide timely review of plans and specifications
➢ Maintain communication with all parties involved in Public Works projects
➢ Provide timely and thorough inspections of construction projects
GOAL3: PROVIDE EXCELLENCE IN CONTRACT MANAGEMENT OPERATION FROM
PLANNING TO CONTRACT CLOSEOUT
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Improve citizen satisfaction with construction impacts
➢ Provide accurate and timely coordination while developing and implementing the City's
Capital Improvement Program
➢ Coordinate with other City departments on their projects to ensure a seamless process
DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS
GOAL5: COORDINATE, DEVELOP AND IMPLEMENT THE CITY'S CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PLAN ON SCHEDULE AND WITHIN BUDGET
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Develop accurate estimates of capital improvement projects
➢ Develop realistic schedules for capital improvement projects using Microsoft Projects
software
➢ Implement measures including preparation of the monthly Work Progress Sheets and
monthly Activity Report to keep budget and schedule in line
➢ Continue tabulating hours for the engineers and charging it to the appropriate project
budget
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FV 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Total capital project costs incurred $35,000,000 $20,000,000 $25,000,000 $62,000,000*
Percent of projects completed under budget 95% 80% 95% 95%
Percent of projects completed on schedule 95% 80% 95% 95%
Percent completed project budget expended
for project management 10% 9% 12% 12%
*This total includes Community Facilities District/Assessment District projects.
POLICE LIEU TE ANT
Darryl
rme
and
Administration
Detectives
Volunteers
CAP Program
Administrative Support
POLICE CHIEF
Jim Domenoe
Christopher Davis
and
Traffic Team
Patrol Officers
K-9 Officer
Community Service Officers
Accident Investigations
Traffic Enforcement
POLICE LIEUTENANT
John Pingel
ial Teams
and
Crime Prevention Unit
School Resource Unit
POP Teams/Satellite Offices
Special Enforcement Team
Special Event Planning
Citizen Corps
DEPARTMENT:
POLICE
Program: Police
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 16,204
$ 20,272
$ 43,590
$ 100,500
Operations & Maintenance
8,410,402
10,144,768
11,392,570
13,373,800
Capital Outlay
152,349
144,698
113,685
42,000
$ 8,578,955
$10,309,738
$11,549,845
$13,516,300
Authorized
Authorized
Personnel Allocation
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
POLICE
Management Analyst
0.00
1.00
1.00
Departnent Total
0.00
1.00
1.00
DEPARTMENT: POLICE
PROGRAM: POLICE ADMINISTRATION
MISSION: The City contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department for police services.
The Police Administration Program is responsible for providing leadership, direction
and general administrative support required for effective and efficient law enforcement.
The program also includes budget coordination and management, personnel and
payroll administration, planning, organizational development and community support.
Additionally, this program ensures cooperation between the Police Department and the
City Manager, other departments, and City Council. The Police Administration
Program is also responsible for overseeing volunteer support services, with an emphasis
on office and logistics support.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Added five explorers and posse members, and four additional CAP volunteers
• Conducted all mandatory training and remained in compliance with POST mandates
• Implemented a training matrix to ensure future compliance with POST and Cal OSHA
requirements
• Established bi-weekly TCC meetings and recruited approximately 100 volunteers
Obtained more than $49,000 Federal and State grant funding
• Completed the first operational manual
• Received a congressional "Honorable Mention" by US Congressman Issa
GOAL 1: PROVIDE A COMPREHENSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT PROGRAM TO ENSURE
A SAFE ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECULA'S RESIDENTS THROUGH THE USE
OF VOLUNTEERS AND UPDATED TRAINING
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct ongoing recruitment of volunteers for the Police Department
➢ Increase CAP roster from 15 to 25 members
➢ Increase TCC volunteer membership from 100 to 200
➢ Conduct a TCC emergency preparedness drill in conjunction with City staff and City and
County public safety officials
➢ Ensure that all personnel are in compliance with all state training mandates
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of volunteers recruited
P.O.S.T. Training Compliance
Percent of City Council and Traffic/Public
Safety Commission Meetings attended
Projected
FY 2002-03
Actual
FY 2002-03
Projected
FY 2003-04
Projected
FY 2004-05
25
25
20
25
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
DEPARTMENT: POLICE
PROGRAM: PATROL SERVICES
MISSION: The Patrol Services Program provides first responders to law enforcement related
public safety requests. The program is divided into three areas: General Patrol, Traffic
Services and Special Teams. Patrol Officers are responsible for maintaining safety and
order in the community. Patrol staff is involved in focused efforts to reduce crime,
which includes general patrol, the utilization of a Police Service Dog, bicycle patrol, and
foot patrol. A part of this component also includes Community Service Officers.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Reduced response times on priority one and two calls
• Immediately provided resources necessary to address unusual incidents
• Provided a safe and relaxed atmosphere at several special events
• Provided adaptive patrol to address special needs and requests
GOAL 1: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE
COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain a high visibility, crime deterrent presence in business and residential areas
➢ Maintain aggressive enforcement of "quality of life" crimes
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Number of general patrol officer
hours provided per day
Response time for Priority 1 calls
Response time for Priority 2 calls
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FV 2002-03 FV 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
136.5 136.5 136.5 136.5
6.0 minutes 6.7 minutes 6.0 minutes 6.0 minutes
9.0 minutes 11.7 minutes 9.0 minutes 9.0 minutes
DEPARTMENT: POLICE
PROGRAM: SPECIAL TEAMS
MISSION: The Special Teams Program provides a focused, cooperative effort to reduce crime by
utilizing the full resources of the community to address the problem. This program
encompasses the Community Orientated Policing philosophy. Its proactive target areas
include crime reduction in multi -housing areas, street level narcotic enforcement, off -
road vehicle programs, anti -graffiti programs and juvenile offender programs. These
units work with community, county and allied agencies to assist them in a long term
approach to solving crime through educational programs, and enforcement.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Reduced and contained crime at the mall on the weekends
• Placed an additional officer at the auto dealerships to respond to their investigative needs
• Continued the successful Crime Free Multi -Housing program
• Conducted a number of lengthy, complex criminal investigations with successful
conclusions
• Lowered the juvenile crime rates within the City through active participation in the
Youth Court program
• Monitored street gang activity and vigorously enforced applicable laws
GOAL 1: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE
COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct proactive enforcement in identified target areas for specific crime problems and
or traffic enforcement issues to include special teams and traffic team personnel
➢ Provide public education in crime prevention, traffic education and public safety matters
➢ Provide intervention and diversion programs focused on reducing juvenile crime
➢ Enhance community relations by promoting activities, educate the public about safety
issues and increase communication between the police department and the community
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FV 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of crime prevention workshops
50
32
50
40
Number of security surveys conducted
225
163
250
200
Number of businesses visited
325
77
300
100
Number of follow-up visits to businesses
300
199
250
225
Number of business watch articles prepared
12
12
12
12
Number of search warrants served
N/A
12
15
20
Number of complex criminal investigations
conducted
N/A
7
10
15
DEPARTMENT: POLICE
PROGRAM: INVESTIGATIONS BUREAU
MISSION: The Investigations Bureau conducts follow-up investigation of initial reports handled by
Patrol Services. The Investigations Bureau is comprised of a Crimes Against Property
Division and a Crimes Against Persons Division. Investigators from either division may
also be utilized at times to initiate and complete investigations that are high profile in
nature, in order to speed up the investigative process, and provide a single source
contact for victims and prosecutors. The Investigations Bureau's focus is to take initial
investigations conducted by Patrol Services, and complete the necessary steps that
cannot be completed by a field officer, due to time and resources, to ensure the identity
and successful prosecution of criminal offenders.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Identified the suspect in a sexual assault crime through DNA found at the scene
Conducted a Megan's Law notification involving a "high risk offender" being released
into the community
• Added a fifth police investigator position
GOAL1: PROVIDE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT INVESTIGATION OF CRIMINAL
VIOLATIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Contact victims of crimes in a timely manner
➢ Conduct Community Training Seminars to maintain open communication between
members of the business community and provide awareness of current crime trends and
prevention strategies
➢ Act as a liaison between the District Attorney's office and the victim(s) to ensure
successful prosecution
➢ Ensure the public is kept current on information concerning sexual violators who may be
residing in the Temecula area
➢ Provide training to assist investigators in the detection and successful prosecution of high
tech crimes such as identity theft and internet criminal activity
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Case closure rate
67%
83.2%
69%
80%
Open case average per detective
22
25
22
35
Number of community seminars conducted
8
2
7
6
DEPARTMENT: POLICE
PROGRAM: TRAFFIC TEAM
MISSION: The Traffic Division provides enhanced enforcement of traffic laws, issuance of citations
and collision investigations throughout the City of Temecula. Collision investigations
range from non -injury to fatal and involve the use of accident reconstruction
investigators which may result in criminal prosecution. The officers assigned to the
team are highly trained in accident investigation, use of radar and the detection of
drivers under the influence of narcotics or alcohol through the use of high profile
enforcement techniques and public education. The team also conducts monthly sobriety
checkpoints referred to as operation ERACIT, (Enforce Responsible Alcohol
Consumption in Temecula) and has a dedicated DUI enforcement officer. This program
also focuses on various alcohol -related offenses involving minors and includes
presentations at local schools.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Issued 14,000 hazardous citations resulting in approximately fifty percent reduction of
injury traffic collisions through the use of motor officers' high visibility techniques
• Conducted twelve DUE checkpoints and roving DUI patrols resulting in 100 arrests
• Issued 5,000 red light citations under the Signal Light Abuse Program (SLAP)
• Incorporated a dedicated DUI officer into the traffic division
• Added an additional riding motor sergeant position
Conducted twelve safety presentations at local middle and high schools
• Conducted twelve seatbelt and pedestrian safety programs and issued 700 related
citations
Added two additional motor officers
GOAL 1: ENSURE EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT LAW ENFORCEMENT IN THE
COMMUNITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct proactive enforcement in identified target areas for specific traffic enforcement
issues
➢ Reduce the number of injury traffic collisions through enforcement and public education
in traffic, pedestrian and bicycle safety
➢ Provide traffic control measures to ensure public safety and orderly traffic flow at special
events within the city
➢ Reduce the number of DUI related traffic collisions through directed enforcement and
public education
Projected Actual Projected Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES: FV 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004415
Number of citations issued for hazardous
violations 9,600 7,651 14,000 17,000
Number of DUI arrests 450 202 480 350
Number of ERACIT Checkpoints conducted 12 12 12 15
K
FIRE CHIEF
Howard Windsor
FIRE
PREVENTION
Jim McBride
Information and Education
Planning and Engineering
Enforcement
Investigation
EMERGENCY
OPERATIONS
Brian Deyo
Glenn Patterson
Fire Suppression
Emergency Medical Services
All Risk Responses
Non -Response Activites
DEPARTMENT:
FIRE
Program: Fire
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004.05
Personnel
$ 90,913 $
147,603
$ 199,150
$ 158,000
Operations & Maintenance
2,477,871
3,203,949
3,986,733
4,727,800
Capital Outlay
242,867
69,940
196,100
Operating Transfers Out
103,268
$ 2,914,919 $
3,351,552
$ 4,255,823
$ 5,081,900
Authorized Authorized
Personnel Allocation 2003-04 Changes 2004-05
FIRE
Administrative Assistant 1.00 0.00 1.00
Office Specialist 0.00 1.00 1.00
Department Total 1.00 1.00 2.00
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
PROGRAM: PREVENTION
MISSION: The mission of the Temecula Fire Services Fire Prevention Bureau is to preserve and
enhance the quality of fife for the citizens of Temecula through the application of a
comprehensive fire and hazard prevention program.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Collected over 3,000 toys and over $2,750 in cash donations for the Spark of Love Toy
Drive that were given to local families in need during the holiday season
• Secured donations to purchase a 39 foot fire safety trailer to be utilized for public
education and senior fire safety training
• Staff have joined the Southern California Risk Watch Coalition to promote childhood
injury prevention programs throughout the elementary schools in the community
• Developed a policy letter for the Riverside County Fire Department to provide awareness
for heat related injuries and motor vehicle safety for children
• Participated in the Riverside County Fire Department policy to placard all fire apparatus
with the Kaitlyn's Law static cling to help prevent children being abandoned in vehicles
during the summer months
GOAL 1: CONDUCT AN ONGOING, PERPETUAL PUBLIC INFORMATION AND
EDUCATION PROGRAM OF FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY WITH A STRONG FOCUS
ON FIRE PREVENTION
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Educate citizens of all ages in proper fire and life safety practices
➢ Begin Adopt -a -School program by fire stations
➢ Purchase, stock, and distribute an adequate supply of handouts with fire and life safety
messages to the stations for dissemination at fairs and during station tours
➢ Participate in existing Fire and Safety Expos
➢ Institute smoke detector and battery checks/change program in all residences while on
responses at those residences
➢ Continue development and distribution of the "After the Fire" Packet
➢ Adopt and promote the National Risk Watch Program in partnership with the Temecula
Unified School District
➢ Evaluate and purchase technological delivery messages for prevention education
GOAL 2: DETERMINE THE ORIGIN AND CAUSE OF ALL FIRES
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Track trends and patterns for serial and/or suspicious fires, coordinating with CDF Law
Enforcement at Perris Headquarters
➢ Coordinate with Building and Safety, Planning, and Public Works for any fires related to
construction and/or development issues
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
GOAL 3: ENSURE A REASONABLE DEGREE OF LIFE SAFETY IN ALL BUILDINGS OPEN
TO THE PUBLIC THROUGH ENFORCEMENT OF, AND COMPLIANCE WITH
APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS AND STANDARDS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Provide timely in-depth inspections of new construction in a timely fashion
➢ Perform Hazardous Occupancy inspection with a fire protection engineering firm
➢ Educate and assist engine companies in inspection practices
➢ Implement Haz-Mat permitting program
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of businesses inspected
2,150
2,333
2,400
2,500
Number of plan checks
1,900
1,666
2,000
1,800
Number of fire prevention bureau inspections
N/A
2,210
2,350
2,400
Number of education contacts at schools
N/A
188
N/A
60
Number of fairs, expos and tour contacts
N/A
101
N/A
60
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
PROGRAM: EMERGENCY OPERATIONS
MISSION: The Temecula Fire Services are dedicated to protect life, property, and the environment
throughout the City, accomplished by a comprehensive emergency service response
program utilizing responsible fiscal management, a highly trained work force,
progressive technology and modern equipment.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Pool safety education information was made available to the public
• An event support trailer was obtained and placed into service allowing personnel to
transport two utility carts for use during City events and provide emergency medical
services to the public
A Public Access Defibrillation (PAD) program was implemented at City facilities for use
in acute cardiac emergencies
GOAL 1: SAFELY RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTIONS ON ALL FIRES,
MINIMIZING THE LOSS OF LIFE AND PROPERTY TO THE CITIZENS OF
TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF THE TIME
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain 5-minute service level as the City grows geographically and demographically
➢ Apply extinguishing agent in 7-8 minutes (prior to flashover)
➢ Full first alarm assignment in operation in 10 minutes
➢ Provide 15 personnel to first alarm assignments as recommended by NFPA 1710
➢ Continue to expand and develop technology solutions to enhance fire service delivery
capabilities
➢ Maintain and replace equipment as needed to maintain operational readiness
➢ Maintain appropriate training levels and fire performance standards
GOAL 2: SAFELY RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE MITIGATING ACTIONS ON
MEDICAL EMERGENCIES, MINIMIZING THE LOSS OF LIFE AND LIMB TO
THE CITIZENS OF TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF
THE TIME
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain 5-minute service level as the City grows geographically and demographically
➢ Initiate ALS patient care within 5-6 minutes
➢ Provide a minimum of two Paramedic and two EMT level personnel on scene
➢ Continue to expand and develop technology solutions to enhance EMS delivery
capabilities
➢ Maintain and replace equipment as needed to maintain operational readiness
➢ Maintain appropriate training levels and EMS certifications
DEPARTMENT: FIRE
COAL3: RESPOND TO AND TAKE APPROPRIATE MITIGATING ACTIONS ON ALL
OTHER EMERGENCY INCIDENTS TO REDUCE THREATS TO THE CITIZENS
OF TEMECULA, ARRIVING IN 5 MINUTES OR LESS 90% OF THE TIME
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Continue to expand and develop technology solutions to enhance fire service delivery
capabilities
➢ Maintain all risk equipment as needed for operational readiness
➢ Maintain appropriate all risk technical training levels
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
Average response time
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FV 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
5 minutes 3.9 minutes 5.0 minutes 5.0 minutes
Percent of calls on scene in 5 minutes or less 90% 91 % 90% 90%
DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROL
Program: Animal Control Funding Source: General Fund
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance 81,105 98,280 132,000 132,000
Capital Outlay
$ 81,105 $ 98,280 $ 132,000 $ 132,000
DEPARTMENT: ANIMAL CONTROL
MISSION: The City of Temecula receives animal control services from Lake Elsinore Animal
Friends (L.E.A.F.), a non-profit agency dedicated to fulfilling the animal control needs
through contractual agreements. L.E.A.F. monitors dog licensing, patrols City
neighborhoods, and ensures the safety of not only Temecula residents, but also animals
found and detained from this area.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
Remained successful in canvassing/marketing efforts throughout neighborhoods to
promote up to date vaccinations and licensing
• Decreased the number of hearing held for public nuisance issues
• Sent animal control staff to PETCO every Saturday for community adoption and
outreach efforts
Made significant progress regionally with the planning efforts of a new shelter facility
GOAL 1: PROVIDE EFFECTIVE ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICE TO PROVIDE A SAFE
ENVIRONMENT FOR TEMECULA RESIDENTS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THE
CITY'S ANIMAL CONTROL ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Routinely patrol neighborhoods to ensure that animals are properly contained
➢ Respond to citizen complains regarding barking, dangerous, or vicious dogs
➢ Monitor the City's dog licensing program to ensure timely processing
➢ Provide a safe and clean shelter facility for detained animals
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2002-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of new licenses issued
1,500
1,400
1,500
2,000
Number of license renewals issued
2000
2,244
2,50
2,700
Number of administrative hearings conducted
17
9
19
15
Program: Non -Departmental
Expenditure Summary
Operations & Maintenance
Operating Transfers Out
DEPARTMENT: NON -DEPARTMENTAL
Funding Source:
General Fund
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
4,217,581 4,960,326 6,522,246 6,549,400
5,030,000 2,209,000 6,210,656 3,730,816
$ 9,247,581 $ 7,169,326 $12,732,902 $10,280,216
MISSION: The Non -Departmental Program is a cost center for general administrative
expenditures such as sales tax reimbursements, the "Revenue Excess Sharing for
Temecula" Program (REST) and property tax administration fees.
FISCAL YEAR 2004-05
OPERATING BUDGET
INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS
SYSTEMS ADMIN
END USER
SUPPORT
ermits Plus Application
Eden Application
RecWare Application
HDL Business Lie App
Crystal Reports
Printing Issues
Logan Issues
IS Training
f � f
DIRECTOR
OF
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Tim Thorson
IN t06u
Enterprise Servers
Data Backup/Restore
Network
Storage Disk Drives
Data Room Alarms
Council Chambers AN
Voice Phone Systems
EOC Communications
GIS
ESRI AmView Support
Map Software
Address Database
CIP Support
Geo Coding
Map Mobile App
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Program: Information Systems
Funding Source:
Charges to City,
Community Services District,
and Redevelopment Agency
Actual
Actual
Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 285,970
$ 500,506
$ 704,290 $ 788,400
Operations & Maintenance
707,368
809,583
889,675 836,800
Capital Outlay
267,322
$ 993,338
$ 1,577,411
$ 1,593,965 $ 1,625,200
Program: GIS* Funding Source: Charges to City,
Community Services District,
and Redevelopment Agency
Actual Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
Expenditure Summary
FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Personnel
$ 208,760
$ 221,500
Operations & Maintenance
70,890
62,900
Capital Outlay
$ - $ _
$ 279,650
$ 284,400
*GIS as of FY 03-04 will be combined with
Information Systems in the Internal Service Fund.
Authorized
Authorized
Personnel Allocation
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
Director of Information Systems
1.00
0.00
1.00
Information Systems Administrator
2.00
0.00
2.00
Information Systems Engineer
0.00
1.00
1.00
Information Systems Specialist
1.00
0.00
1.00
GIS Administrator
1.00
0.00
1.00
GIS Analyst
1.00
0.00
1.00
Administrative Assistant
1.00
0.00
1.00
Webmaster
1.00
0.00
1.00
Department Total
8.00
1.00
9.00
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
MISSION: The Information Systems Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation, and
replacement of computer and communications equipment It also provides centralized
information systems support and services, as well as computer software and City
enterprise application support.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Moved telephone service from copper to digital channel with Flex Grow
• Migrated the network operating system from Novell to Microsoft Active Directory and
upgraded the e-mail system
• Installed enterprise Storage Area Network (SAN) and backup tape library
• Fully implemented a GIS-based Mobile Fire Response program for fire and medic
response units to enhance response times
• Designed and implemented City's intranet site and provided interface to access data
reports to City departments
• Installed the Accela wireless inspection application with tablet PC's
• Installed the Cisco PIX firewall to support Virtual Private Networking (VPN)
connections to remote terminals and allow for third party application assistance
• Developed and installed anti-SPAM filters to the City e-mail system
• Procured and installed a major retrofit of the City Council Chamber's audio visual
system
GOAL1: IMPROVE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL BUSINESS PROCESSES AND
CUSTOMER SERVICE LEVELS FOR THE CITY
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Use Information Systems Performance Measurements (Metrics) to evaluate customer
support calls and system outages to enable root cause analysis and trend reporting on
equipment performance and customer satisfaction
➢ Provide all necessary resources to facilitate the implementation of best -practice
automation tools throughout the City
➢ Define, test, and implement remote access capabilities, to meet the needs of City Council
and staff for all communication methods
➢ Create dynamic web templates to define editable regions, allowing City departments to
manage the content on their page of the City website
GOAL 2: MANAGE THE CITY'S RAPIDLY GROWING INFORMATION SYSTEMS NEEDS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Maintain the Information System's Strategic Plan that covers the next cycle of
innovation and system usability
➢ Enhance the productivity of City staff, both in the office and in the filed through
increased technology
➢ Create a City intranet page with portal technology for disseminating inter -departmental
information
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
GOAL 3: IMPROVE DISASTER RECOVERY PREPAREDNESS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Upgrade the information systems infrastructure for improved data center environmental
support, data protection, and fail -over distributed data processing capabilities
➢ Plan for load balanced data center services between the data center in City Hall and a yet
to be determined alternate data center
➢ Provide a highly available data center with a consolidated maintenance contract
➢ Maintain and upgrade the City's own radio and wireless communications assets
COST ALLOCATION:
Charges to departments are calculated based on the number of computer workstations
supported by Information Systems staff in each department
Projected
Actual
Projected
Projected
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
FY 2602-03
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
Number of help desk requests completed
1,200
1,400
1,800
2,400
Number of website page hits
288,000
312,000
500,000
800,000
Number of Computers installed and supported
277
283
342
350
Amount of data backed up on the SAN
500 GB
615 GB
1 TB
1.5 TB
DEPARTMENT: INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PROGRAM: GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS (GIS)
MISSION: The GIS Fund accounts for the acquisition of computer equipment, software, and GIS
data used in the application support and service of the City's system.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Fulfilled over 659 mapping and data analysis requests using the GIS
• Created and maintained over 1,100 data layers
• Provided data maintenance for Megan's Law website, fire response mobile mapping
program, emergency notification system, City's internet GIS (map objects), and
economic alliance website
• Implemented Emergency Notification System
• Field tested Code Enforcement mobile mapping system for implementation in 2004-05
• Developed City maintained street layer for Public Works department
• Assisted with establishing Countywide task force to explore feasibility of implementing
GIS based fire response program and integrate fire response program with County
dispatch system
• Supported the establishment of a GIS based in -vehicle response and routing program for
ambulance and fire protection services
GOAL 1: OPERATE THE CITYWIDE GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) TO
MEET LOCAL DATA AND INFORMATION NEEDS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Update the County database and develop additional data layers to support City
departments and programs and to increase efficiency in providing public information
➢ Establish connections between the GIS and other City databases
➢ Produce reports and map exhibit for various City departments in support of their
operations and for the community to improve customer service
➢ Implement Arc Internet Mapping Service (IMS)
GOAL 2: INCREASE USABILITY OF GIS DATA FOR CITY STAFF
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Conduct ArcView training for appropriate and designated staff
➢ Integrate Permits Plus applications with GIS
➢ Develop program for the utilization of the City's GPS unit
GOAL3: COORDINATE WITH CONSULTANTS, JURISDICTIONS, AND OUTSIDE
AGENCIES TO GAIN AWARENESS OF DATA AVAILABILITY AND DATA
SHARING OPPORTUNITIES WITH CITY GIS TECHNOLOGY AND
APPLICATIONS
OBJECTIVES: ➢ Coordinate with Southeastern California GIS Council (SECGIS) to set up regional data
sharing group
➢ Coordinate with other cities and agencies to develop a common database
DEPARTMENT: INFORMATION SYSTEMS
PERFORMANCE MEASURES:
City data sets supported
Number of GIS requests completed
Number of trainings conducted
Projected Actual Projected Projected
FY 2002-03 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
25 26 30 45
500 536 750 1000
Program: Insurance
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Personnel Allocation
Fiscal Services Manager
Administrative Secretary
Department Total
INSURANCE
Funding Source: Charges to City,
Community Services District,
and Redevelopment Agency
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
FY 2001-02 FY 2002.03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
$ 31,126 $ 43,728 $ 46,715 $ 49,200
492,798 471,114 587,100 626,100
$ 523,924 $ 514,841 $ 633,815 $ 675,300
Authorized Authorized
2003-04 Changes 2004-05
0.25
0.25
0.50
MISSION: The Insurance Fund is the cost center for the financing and accounting fo the
City's risk management and insurance functions. Costs reflected in the Insurance
Fund include property, liability, automobile insurance, claims adminstration
services, legal, and other direct costs relating to claims and potential litigation.
2003-2004 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Renewed the City's property insurance policy at a very competitive premium and maintained the same
deductible levels.
• Reduced administrative costs associated with claims due to efficient internal review
COST ALLOCATION:
Charges to departments are allocated based on the number of full-time equivalent personnel
in each department.
0.25
0.25
0.50
VEHICLES
Program: Vehicles Funding Source: Charges to City and
Community Services District
Actual Actual Budgeted Proposed
Expenditure Summary FY 2001-02 FY 2002-03 FY 2003-04 FY 2004-05
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance $ 126,194 $ 215,668 $ 243,600 $ 291,900
Capital Outlay
$ 126,194 $ 215,668 $ 243,600 $ 291,900
MISSION: The Vehicle Fund is used to account for the acquisition, depreciation, and
replacement of City Vehicles.
COST ALLOCATION:
Charges to departments are allocated based on the actual depreciation charge for
vehicles used by each department.
Program: Facilities
Expenditure Summary
Personnel
Operations & Maintenance
Capital Outlay
Personnel Allocation
Maintenance Superintendent
Maintenance Supervisor
Facility Maintenance Coordinator
Lead Maintenance Worker
Maintenance Worker
Custodian
Office Specialist
Department Total
FACILITIES
Funding Source: Charges to City,
Community Services District,
and Redevelopment Agency
Actual
Actual
Budgeted
Proposed
FY 2001-02
FY 2002-03
FY 2003-04
FY 2004-05
$ 197,763
$ 292,633
$ 311,505
$ 369,800
165,784
223,570
268,960
271,300
7,729
7,317
74,887
7,000
$ 371,276
$ 523,519
$ 655,352
$ 648,100
Authorized
Authorized
2003-04
Changes
2004-05
0.25
0.00
0.25
0.30
0.00
0.30
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.50
0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
0.00
1.00
0.30
0.00
0.30
3.35
0.00
3.35
ITEM 20
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR. OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Review and Adoption of the FY 2005-09 Capital Improvement Program
PREPARED BY: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM F OR F Y 2 005-09 A ND A DOPTING T HE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2004-05
DISCUSSION: The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is the City's plan for providing
public improvements which exceed $25,000 in cost, have long-term life spans, and are nonrecurring.
The proposed CIP document serves as a planning tool for the coordination of financing and scheduling
of all capital improvement projects over the next five years.
CIP DEVELOPMENT
The CIP was developed by taking recommendations provided by the staff and the City Council during a
series of workshops. The primary focus of these workshops was to identify community needs in the
areas of roads/streets; bridges; public buildings; parks and recreation facilities; and redevelopment
projects. All projects were reviewed to ensure consistency with the provisions of the City's General
Plan, as well as the long-term vision of the City as developed by the City Council.
The Parks and Recreation Commission at their May 10, 2004 meeting reviewed the Parks and
Recreation portion of the document and approved the proposed projects.
The Public/Traffic Safety Commission at their May 27, 2004 meeting reviewed the Circulation and
Infrastructure portion of the document and found it acceptable, with consideration for comments to
change priorities on several projects.
On June 2, 2004 the Planning Commission found the proposed CIP to be consistent with the General
Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65403 of the State Planning and Zoning Law.
Finance/Papagg/9udgaVCIP 02-M CIP02 Resolution.AGN
On May 20, 2004 the City Council held a workshop to review and discuss the draft CIP. A presentation
was provided to the City Council on an overview of the Capital Improvement Program. City
Councilmembers and staff discussed in detail several projects within the CIP. At the City Council's
request a 10,000 square foot Children's Museum expansion has been programmed in the CIP with
unspecified funding at this time. Also, the traffic signal at the intersection of Sanborn Avenue and
Jefferson Avenue has been fully funded in FY 2005-06.
COSTS
Overall, the total cost as identified in the CIP is $441,272,944. A total of 111 projects are included in
the program, consisting of thirty-eight (38) Circulation Projects, twenty-seven (27) Infrastructure/Other
Projects, thirty-nine (39) Park Projects, and seven (7) Redevelopment Agency/Housing Projects. The
following illustrates the associated costs for each project classification and total cost:
Project Cost
Circulation $284,329,338
Infrastructure/Other Projects $ 98,089,488
Parks $ 45,136,385
Redevelopment/RDA Housing $ 13,717,733
Total $441.27 944
REVENUE
Projected revenue from identified sources for the Five Year Capital Improvement Program is
$291,955,728. Unspecified (unfunded) project costs for the five year program total $148,440,500.
Through the first three years of the five year program, there is adequate funding for all proposed
projects. The CIP is fully funded in FY 2004-05 at $122,357,869 FY 2005-06 at $54,204,077 and in FY
2006-07 at $40,674,118.
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
There are thirty-eight (38) circulation projects in the CIP totaling $284,329,338. The circulation projects
represent 67% of the available funding. Of particular interest is the French Valley Interchange — Interim
South Bound Off -Ramp, Rancho California Road Widening at Old Town Front Street to South Bound I-
15, Pechanga Parkway Improvements, as well as, Winchester Road and Jefferson Road Intersection
Improvements. The first year of the CIP, Fiscal Year 2004-05 has a total circulation funding
requirement of $73,887,478 and contains 23 priority one projects. All of these projects will have a
significant result on traffic circulation and ultimately the quality of life in the City.
INFRASTRUCTURE/OTHER PROJECTS
Within the Infrastructure section of the CIP there are twenty seven (27) projects totaling $98,089,488.
The more complex projects include the Old Town Community Theater, two Fire Stations (Roripaugh
and Wolf Creek) and the Temecula Library. The Fiscal Year 2004-05 funding is over $25,000,000 for
Infrastructure projects.
PARK PROJECTS
The highlight in this section of the CIP is the new Sports Park which is fully funded. The total funding
for Park projects is $39,286,385. Of the thirty-nine (39) park projects identified in this year's CIP,
twenty-seven (27) are fully funded. Other park projects of interest are Pablo Apis Park, Vail Ranch
Middle School Basketball Lighting, Veteran's Memorial, and the Nakayama Garden and Tree Lighting
project proposed for the Duck Pond.
REDEVELOPMENT DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (RDA) PROJECTS
There are seven (7) RDA projects and all are fully funded over a five year CIP. These projects include
Old Town Mixed Use Housing, Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping and the relocation of historic
sites in Old Town (including the Escallier House). Within the first year of the CIP, RDA projects total
over $5,000,000.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of the FY 2005-09 Five Year Capital Improvement Program
establishes the project appropriations for FY 2004-05. Projects which do not have sufficient funds
within the funding source will not proceed until the funding has been secured.
Attachment:
Resolution 2004-
Draft Capital Improvement Program 2005-09
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FY 2005-09 AND
ADOPTING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FY 2004-2005
WHEREAS, the City of Temecula requires public infrastructure improvements in the areas of streets,
highways, transportation facilities, parks, recreational facilities and public buildings and facilities; and
WHEREAS, the careful timing of the installation of such improvements is necessary so as to best serve
the public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, in order to prioritize these public infrastructure and improvements, a Capital Improvement
Program is necessary;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY
RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Capital Improvement Program FY 2005-09 is hereby approved and a copy of this
program will be kept on file in the City Clerk's office.
Section 2.Adoption of this Program is categorically exempt from environmental review under the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Pursuant to Section 15262 of the State Guidelines for
Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning studies for possible future
actions, which actions the City Council has not approved, adopted or funded, does not require
preparation of an EIR or Negative Declaration, but does require consideration of environmental factors.
In reviewing this Program and conducting public hearings on it, the City Council has considered
relevant environmental factors. This City Council, as the lead agencyfor environmental review pursuant
to the California Environmental Quality Act and the Guidelines promulgated thereunder (collectively
"CEQA") has reviewed the scope and nature of this Capital Improvement Program and has concluded
that the planning and prioritization process comprising this activity is not a project pursuant to CEQA
because it does not order or authorize the commencement of any physical or other activity that would,
directly or indirectly, have a significant effect upon the environment. The Capital Improvement Program
merely establishes a listing of priority and allocates funds for the City to commence the necessary
planning studies, including review pursuant to CEQA, at a future, unspecified date. The future planning
studies will be conducted at the earliest possible time, so as to ensure thorough review pursuant to
CEQA.
Recognizing that the protection of the environment is a key factor in the quality of life within the City of
Temecula, and to further the City's strict adherence to both the spirit and letter of the law as regards
CEQA, this City Council has also considered this Capital Improvement Program as if it were a Project
pursuant to CEQA. Reviewing this Program as a Project, this City Council concludes that the Project
would be exempt from review under CEQA both pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) and pursuant to the
categorical exemption set forth in Section 15262 of CEQA. Section 15061(b)(3) would apply because it
can be seen with certainty that this prioritizing and fund allocation program, cannot and does not have
the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment. No physical activity will occur until all
required CEQA review is conducted at the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Program
are undertaken. Section 15262 provides a categorical exemption to actions that are feasibility or
planning studies related to possible future actions. This Council is aware of and has considered the
current and relevant environmental factors as an integral component of the review of this Program.
This Council, as lead agency, hereby determines and decides that the exemption provided by both
Section 15061(b)(3) and 15262 apply in the event this is deemed a Project pursuant to CEQA.
Section 3. That certain document now on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Temecula
entitled "City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program FY 2005-09" included herein appropriations
for FY 2004-05 is hereby adopted. The CIP appropriations for the 2003-2004 Fiscal Year which have
not been completed, encumbered, nor included in the FY 2004-08 CIP are hereby carried over for each
applicable project to the Fiscal Year 2004-2005. Certain Development Impact Fees from future
revenue may be used to replace the expenditure of current capital reserve funds in the CIP.
Section 4. On June 2, 2004 the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement Program
consistent with the General Plan in accordance with Government Code Section 65404(c) of State
Planning and Zoning Law.
Section 5. That the following controls are hereby placed on the use and transfers of budget
appropriations:
A. No expenditure of funds shall be made unless there is an unencumbered
appropriation available to cover the expenditure.
B. The City Manager may authorize expenditures of funds in amounts up to $25,000.
Any expenditure of funds in excess of $25,000 requires City Council action.
C. The City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts in amounts
up to $25,000, if sufficient appropriated funds are available.
D. The City Manager may authorize transfers of up to $25,000 between approved Capital
Improvement Program projects.
Notwithstanding Section 5B, pursuant to Section 3.13.080 of the Municipal Code, the
City Manager may authorize Public Works contracts in amounts up to $25,000. Any
expenditures of Public Works funds in excess of $25,000 require City Council action,
except that the City Manager may approve change orders on Public Works contracts
approved by the Council in amounts up to project contingency established by Council.
Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular
meeting held on the 8th day of June 2004.
Mike Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No.
2004- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting
thereof held on the 81h day of June, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
ITEM 21
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY �y DIRECTOR OF FIN C
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: c 'Susan W. Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Public/Traffic Safety Commission Appointment
PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Secretary
RECOMMENDATION: Appoint one applicant to serve on the Public/Traffic Safety Commission
for an un-expired term through October 10, 2005.
BACKGROUND: Due to the resignation of Commissioner Mark Katan there is an un-expired
term available through October 10, 2005. The City Clerk's office has followed the Council's
established procedure for filling a Commission vacancy by advertising the opening in the local
newspaper. Notices were also posted at various locations within the City and on the City's Web
page. When the deadline was reached for accepting applications, the applications were forwarded
to the subcommittee comprised of Mayor Naggar and Councilmember Stone for review and
recommendation. Both Mayor Naggar and Councilmember Stone recommend the appointment of
Gary Yomans. All applicants are registered voters and live within the city limits of Temecula. The
term is through October 10, 2005.
Attached are copies of the applications that were received by the filing deadline of May 20, 2004
ATTACHMENTS: Five (5) Copies of Applications for Appointment.
Agenda Reports/Appointment Traffic Commission
RECEIVED
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org
(909)694-6444
MAY 12 2004
KS DEPT.
Commission Appointment
Application
Y
III
°{fy oomectt7$'an�egisfer(•'�'ot�Fltl
the o1"nte
Please Check One: /
Planning Community Services. V Public Traffic Safety/
Number of years as a City CIof Terfpp% ytY9ecula Reside t �MoS' Are you a qi Registered Voter? ✓ ��S
Ai /Lw• CDUNf�SfnIC� IQ95 �) VR-5)
NAME: Tuwor 6-xyS5"A) OCCUPATION:%i pj6Y --STAY-/FT- tgM6 e,44t F
ADDRESS: 43,03(o ('.A'MIKID cii5 lbt,116 ?t`✓VLtG�L4- 92592-
DAYTIME PHONE:6dy) 303 1 *5 EVENING PHONE: Id 9� 3e3 /ye a
EMPLOYERNAME: L4j-A) Wf�CC OF SWrG-"D 5MAA) 14.P•C-
EMPLOYER A DRES l'I353fi �Ul fi£PffWC�Ta`O�g E-MA14i�I1'DSSmane!5g yfri
� I
Educational Background/Degrees: f P - (LAW) .LDYah- OF LDS, AV&C 55 LA7J SGd'DDL-Mq�
B.,� - 6 EG'LI5'y) Gielt -- / 911 j 601/R.Scwo'ek (nl e6?T7ntD FfAml"" L, li` lAA/N�r
PP-dfsP-R K 41- Ull CYTt rU.S/qiS
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of
service:
d,0,d6
List any organ5151,6F
to which ou belong (F
TUnIIORr 2.I W ID15me A�J �86�^p�AlP OF'Pigee
yYtDW S ( 4'"8.OF 2nA3�-�nnrr_n
Al
service):
in/,J
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific.(You ma aft h sep rate sheet of paper if necessary.)
As OUP Co n..nu,J � r� t—�I�E�En�ES �x Pt ci�E
J.DJJ6-1Tyem PLR r ld&-) esPC-tRuy ��.Gry /+�FPas�7�Qsvussv�s ,Ps r�>`n�c
CflNT¢pt- H/+vE cEr49�Ksh+1p Qvunss lE2rE�lCt. F�on1 Pe�o2 rCri rr
(AKA s£1zvtCC TV iC kn! OF OULf- Drys Ptu,rC
PI,Rr✓nlrnl(-'rEtt-yv— T A-W, f wvvATEP., OA&A017EyJ JkDIt N-01AtilD 1fVCR45fJd6 .
I understand that any or allinformation on. this form maybe verified. I consent to the
release of this information for pubHe information purposes.
Date: 511010,q
Plea a return to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
PLEASE BE AWARE OF THE ADVERTISED DEADLINE
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org
(909)694-6444
5-14-C-111:21 PC
Commission Appointment
Application
`. :For propaF,eonsidecatlop yowmu"s.�oulrgngyiba a, resident of the.. ,
l lty of Tr )necWla arid a Rgpretiered �/oter ]Atha C,Ity of 7emewa.
RECEIVED
MAY 19 2004
CITY CLERKS DEPT.
Please Check One.
Planning = Community Services ED Public Traffic Safety
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 4 _ Are you a City Registered Voter? YES
NAME: THOMAS WINFIELD JEFFREY OCCUPATION: DEPUTY CITY TREASURER
ADDRESS: 30647 CALLE PINA COLADA, TEMECULA, CA 92591
DAYTIME PHONE: 760.776.6383 (WORK) EVENING PHONE: 909.699.2355 (HOME)
EMPLOYER NAME: CITY OF PALM DESERT
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESERT, CA 92260-2578
E-MAIL tieffreyl8@yahoo.com
Educational Background/Degrees: CLAREMONT McKENNA COLLEGE (B.A., POLITICAL SCIENCE)
LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL (JURIS DOCTOR)
U.S.C. GRADUATE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS (M.B.A., FINANCE)
UC IRVINE EXTENSION PROGRAM (H.R. MANAGEMENT CERTIFICATE)
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service:
MEMBER, CITY OF PALM DESERT INVESTMENT AND FINANCE
COMMITTEE (1998 -- PRESENT)
BOARD OF TRUSTEES, PAUMA SCHOOL DISTRICT (1995 -- 1996)
List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service):
MEMBER, CALIFORNIA MUNICIPAL TREASURERS'S ASSOCIATION
PRESIDENT, CALLE PINA COLADA ROADWAY COMMITTEE
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
SEE ATTACHED SHEET
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for
public Information purposes.
a l tuna4 .i4-er----f� river%�.�(O )
Please return to: City Clerk's O 20 Business Park Drive (909) 4-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Please be aware of the advertised deadline
el
CITY OF TEMECULA
Commission Appointment Application
Public/Traffic Safety —Thomas Winfield Jeffrey
May 17, 2004
In the course of living in Temecula over the past four years, I have taken an interest in
traffic issues, having first lived on Promenade Chardonnay Hills, and then, on Calle Pina
Colada. Consequently, I have done extensive research on traffic calming measures,
including stop signs, traffic undulations, and road markings, in order to be more
informed about community issues. This has led me to develop an interest in the field of
transportation planning.
I believe that this interest, coupled with my local government experience, my strategic
planning experience, and my legal background, would enable me to make a valuable
contribution to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission, in terms of analyzing
transportation issues from a variety of perspectives.
Given the rapid growth of Temecula, I could not think of a more important commission
to serve on than the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
Page 2 of 2
r
,l a_2 0 - it4 F
.,,.._:�-i
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive Commission Appointment
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org Application
(909)694-6444
RECEIVED
Tor proper cons}oars;ron, you 1nutueul
City of Tifjnec4lb and a Registered Vot
Please Check One:
=Planning ®Community Services
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 1_4
NAME: William J. Thomas Jr
ADDRESS: 41893 Niblick Road, Temecula, CA 92591
DAYTIME PHONE: 760-750-4512
itly'b" residentofth'e`.
theCity of TemaPula `
®✓ Public Traffic Safety
Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes
OCCUPATION: Safety Specialist
EVENING PHONE: 909-693-0102
EMPLOYER NAME: California State University San Marcos
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 333 S. Twin Oaks Valley Road, San Marcos, CA 92096-0001
bthomas@csusm.edu or btkt5@yahoo.com
Educational Background/Degrees:
B.S. - Occupational Safety
MAY 2 0 2004
CLERKS Ls
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service:
I have not served on a committee but I was referred to this position by a current Planning Commission member -
Ron Guerriero.
List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service):
American Society of Safety Engineers - Member since 1992
Assistant Varsity/Junior Varsity Basketball Coach - Burrillville High School - Burrillville, RI 2000 - 2002
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
My wife and I moved to Temecula from Rhode Island a little over a year ago. The family focus of the town
appealed to me right away. I would like to serve the community and I believe my professional experience matches
the commission's position opening. In fact, I have recently created a Traffic Control/Flagging PowerPoint training
for the university. Please refer to my resume for a more detailed description of my work experiences.
1 understand that any or all Information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this Information for
public Information purposes. �/�,,
Signature: '�' "' G Date: Q
Please return to: Ciq Clerk's Office, 43 0 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 903 , Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Please be aware of the advertised deadline
WILLIAM J. THOMAS JR.
41893 Niblick Road
Temecula, CA 92591
(909) 693-0102, btkt5@yahoo.com
EXPERIENCE
Safety Specialist, California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, California 2004 - Present
• Administer Health and Safety programs; Occupational, Fire and Life Safety, Industrial Hygiene and
Environmental Compliance.
• Implement the University's Injury and Illness Prevention Program.
• Administer campus safety programs; i.e. Construction Safety, Storm Water Management Program.
• Create/ provide safety training; Traffic Control/Flagging Safety, Electric Cart Safety Training, Confined
Space.
• Conduct routine campus safety inspections of; Labs, Facilities, Visual Performing Arts and
Administrative Buildings.
• Assist in coordinating Hazardous Materials, Radioactive Waste Program and provide Emergency
Response Management.
• Recommend apply, enforce and uphold University, State and Federal polices, procedures and
regulations.
• Prepare written reports and maintain records regarding regulatory compliance.
• Coordinate local, state and federal permit application.
• Provide input to the Risk Management and Safety Director in regards to the RM&S budget.
• Provide direct support to the Director and Risk Manager.
Safety Manager, EDGE Development, Temecula, California 2003-2004
• Responsible for addressing safety and health issues on approximately 30 active construction sites;
average estimated cost of each site, $10.5 million dollars.
• Conduct site safety evaluations, evaluate risk exposures, identify risk factors and develop
recommendations to address substandard conditions and mitigate hazards on each site
• Require superintendents and other responsible parties to ensure timely resolution of issues and inform
management if timely resolution is not achieved
• Coordinate and/or implement safety training i.e.; IIPP, Ergonomics, Incident/Accident
Investigation/Reporting, CPR, First Aid, Emergency Response, Lockoutffagout, Hazardous
Communication, Right -To -Know, Forklift, Heavy Equipment, Scaffolding/Ladders, Fall Protection,
Trenching/Shoring, Ergonomics, OSHA 10 hour training, Competent Person, Permitting Requirements
and basic Toolbox Talks.
• Perform periodic loss analysis and provide management with detailed loss experience analysis that
identifies frequency/severity issues
• Investigate injuries and assist with return -to -work issues along with the human resources coordinator
and superintendents
Loss Prevention Consultant 1,11,111, Beacon Mutual Insurance, Warwick, Rhode Island 1995 - 2003
• Surveyed potential and insured workers' compensation clients with premium sizes in excess of
$100,000
• Evaluated substandard conditions/potential hazards and made recommendations to eliminate the
substandard conditions or mitigate the potential hazards
• Responsible for client problem resolution inquiries about workers compensation insurance
• Highly competent in conducting loss analysis, trending and forecasting to enhance loss prevention
performance and maximize risk profitability
• Managed and coordinated the loss prevention activities for larger insured accounts with multiple sites
and safety groups/associations
• Developed, organized and provided loss prevention PowerPoint seminarsJtraining sessions for insured
accounts and agents. Worked with local hotels and colleges to coordinate off site training. Training
included but was not limited to: Accident Investigation, Developing a Safety Committee, Ergonomics,
Job Safety Analysis (JSA), Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and Defensive Driving.
• Investigated serious accidents with insured clients, provided the claims department with technical
information regarding losses and responded to claim requests for accident investigations
• Conducted noise evaluations / dosimetry testing for insured clients
Loss Control Engineer, Aetna Insurance, Strafford, Connecticut 1993 —1994
• Appraised hazards and exposures of customers in a property casualty setting
• Conducted surveys of current and potential insured accounts, operations and procedures
• Evaluated the hazards, exposures and controls of people, processes, and property
• Pointed out the deficiencies and made recommendations to eliminate the substandard conditions in
regards to multi -line insurance coverages: fire potential, product liability, general liability, workers
compensation, automobile and marine coverage
EDUCATION
Keene State College — Keene, New Hampshire 1993
Bachelor of Science: Occupational Safety, Associate of Science: Chemical Dependency, Minor: Psychology
COMPUTER SKILLS
Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Adobe Photoshop, Lotus Notes, Outlook, AS400, Imaging, Internet
Microsoft Windows 2000 Network and Operating System Essentials, Bryant College 2001
Computer Application Technology, New England Institute of Technology 2001
TRAINING & AFFILIATIONS
Advanced Safety Certificate, National Safety Council/Massachusetts Safety Council 2002
American Society of Safety Engineers 1992 - Present
5-17-04; 7:05PM;FInanee Dapertmant RECEIVED ;,,eo 3414584 x :1 2
MAY 19 2004
CITY CLERKS DEPT.
5 823 ",E,-
City of Temecula
tsTemecula. CA 92590 2oo Business Park Drive Commission Appointment
ryas www.cityoftemocula.org AppliCQtion
(Mg) 694-6444
.,for prgpar ccnaideratlon; yorrmwtcurrynty tre.a raslderB of the .
_ Clly of Temecula and a RftWwW Voter in fho CByof Temecula.' .
Pf we Cheek one:
=Planning =Community Services Public Truffle Satjaty
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 1 Q Are you a City Registered Voter? L
NAME: V�L)LrC
ADDRESS: 3 v
U✓5
EMPLOYERAADI
EMAIL r v
I l-7NMA1 OCCUPATION: SR L LJ Mf A./46 O,
RL L— JOINA Cot 11-0f1- 1 L59 I
` y 57Y c-% EVENM PHONE, �%�
S9066S; jF6-C
, ri , CC)
cuuc uunar oacrQrounaruegrees
re I /2 �Q ; Lk h t V 8 ra ( 4-co 0 1 ((r r'1 vt Q S j ttl j 6 (cJ✓ C.Jt A^ 4SC1.743
14(f� 5L c�y�or i FlrssdH.t — Cluj -Fort l-F*�j� S��ev�e (t�s7>
Lit any Cky or County Boarr~d, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the years) of service: ✓
List any organizations to wh h you belong (professional, technI I, Community service): �I
/M/�'Q�°r►n�er�C c�pc�'SL,(\1 %C'1Qr.L,jvrL(,i �✓nvvlra[nr /�5SF7.
k.VQ i �/ Ci� �t /rcC fUi�s V00 VYLCS Q0.5`j' I�PS1��
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Pleas be (You gray, attach a separate jh09t Of paper if necessary _Tf/C11` a ( C
t,ra�� � (r_`A_r'�,if-6—/ei'h.S (vl ��i'✓� C cc, (cZ 4"'+O� `{- -t'�°tie
-es %1�c..� cLT + i wL
I un any or`a1f " ion on this may bee verieed. I consent to ffia� ease of this irrformathm for
.puWkln/ � ..
over
IG -(9 -0 -
Date:
Please retU tD: City Clerk's Offtae, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694.6444 {pR)
Mail to: P.O Box 9033,.Temecula, CA 9250-9033
Please be aware of the advertised deadline
RECEIVED
MAY - 6 2W4
City of Temecula
PT.
43200 Business Park Drive Commission Appointment
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemeculs.org Application
(909) 694-64*1 1 - --- 7
For proper consideration, you must currently be resident of the
City of Temecula and a Registered Voter In the City of Temecula
Please Check One:
= Planning = Community Services Public Traffic Safety
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 14 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes
NAME: Gary Youmans
ADDRESS: 32206 Corte Chatada, Temecula 92592
OCCUPATION: E.V.P., Community Natl. Bank
DAYTIME PHONE: (760)432-1120 EVENING PHONE: (909)694-5679
EMPLOYER NAME: Community National Bank
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 900 Canterbury PI., Escondido, CA 92025
wineyos@adelphia.net
Educational Background/Degrees:
Bachelor of Science, Political Science, San Diego State University
MBA, Pacific Coast BankingSchool
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service:
General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee
List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service):
National Association of Government Guaranteed Lenders, St. Martha's Catholic Church Finance Committee,
CDC Small Business Finance Corp., EDC of South Riverside County
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
I have lived in Temecula since 1990 and watched it grow. We have enjoyed a great quality of life in Temecula and
now I would like to give back to my community. I believe my involvement in a number of volunteer community
activities such as the youth sports, support of the Arts and Habitat for Humanity and service on the Board of the
EDC and other organizations as welt as the General Plan Citizens Advisory Committee have prepared me to
make a positive contribution to the Public/Traffic Safety Commission.
1 understand that My or all Inform tion on this form may be verified, l consent to the release of this Information for
public infortnaft fr rrposes.
Signature.• Date:
Please tetu : Ai
lerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 (OR)
to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
lease be aware of the advertised deadline
ITEM 22
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY `
DIRECTOR OF FIN/
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: �u Susan W. Jones
v QCity Clerk/Director of Support Services
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Appointments
PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Secretary
RECOMMENDATION: Appointtwo applicants to serve on the Planning Commission for full three-
year terms through June 4, 2007.
BACKGROUND: The terms of Commissioners John Telesio and Mary Jane Olhasso
expired on June 4, 2004. The City Clerk's office has followed the Council's established procedure
for filling a Commission vacancy by advertising the openings in the local newspaper. Notices were
also posted at various locations within the City and on the City's Web page. When the deadline was
reached for receiving applications, the applications were forwarded to the subcommittee comprised
of Mayor Naggar and Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero for review and recommendation. Mayor Naggar
and Mayor Pro Tern Comerchero have recommended the reappointment of Commissioners Olhasso
and Telesio. All applicants are registered voters and live within the city limits of Temecula. This
term is through June 4, 2007.
Attached are copies of the qualifying applications that were received bythe filing deadline of May 20,
2004.
ATTACHMENTS: Three (3) Copies of Applications for Appointment.
Agenda Reports/Appointment Planning Commission
RECEIVED
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org
(909) 694-6444
MAY 10 2004
Commission Appoin 77S
DEPT
Application
- fi*'Prgpw consideratk^ You'1¢ust.6urrvitly b" meident of dip.,
City of t4mecula and a Reolzh ed Viler id tire City of Temecula
i
Phase Chock One:
�Planning =Community Services Public Traffic Safety
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 2 __ Are you a City Registered Voter? Let_
NAME: Clyde Bacon
DAYTIME PHONE:
EMPLOYER NAME: HomeTown Financial Services
OCCUPATION: Corporate Trainer
EVENING PHONE: 909/302-7291
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 135 W. Mission AvSuite 205, Escondido, CA 92025
EMAIL
Educational Background/Degrees:
1973 B.S. Western Kentucky University - Sociology
1975 M.A. Western Kentucky University - Marriage & Family Studies
List any City or County Board, Committee orCommission•on which you have served and the years) of service:
none
List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service):
2003 to Present - Vice President - Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley
2001 to 2002 - President - Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley
1997 to 1998 - President - Toastmasters
2003 to Present -Vice Chair - Board of Administration - Mountain View Community Church
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
'See attached Sheetl
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for
public Information purposes. '/
Signature:'----1� -- Data*( /Jzo
Please return to: ' Clerk s Office, 43200 Business Park Drive 909) 694-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Please be awareof the advertised deadline
May 6, 2004
City Clerk's Office
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Dear Commission Selection Committee:
My wife and three children have lived in the Temecula Valley since 1989.
We have grown to love this valley and this city. We can't think of anyplace else we
would like to live.
I've watched Temecula grow from a small town to a bustling city. One of the most
consistent things I've observed is that Temecula has always strived to be the best it could
be and offer the best facilities and services to its citizens. If fact you could say Temecula
has a reputation for always going first class and thinking years into the future. I like that
attitude and I want to contribute to Temecula continuing to be a first class city.
I think I have the leadership, analytical and communication skills necessary to be apart of
the planning committee. I've been on the Board of Directors for Habitat for Humanity for
over 5 years. During that time I've had the opportunity to work with Ron Roberts, Chuck
Washington, Lori Rubin -Stone and Lori Schulenberg and Christine McCuster. I've also
worked 10 years in the managed care industry as well as 7 years in the real estate
industry.
I would like the city to continue to build more parks and preserve more open spaces. The
potential of the French Valley Airport needs to be addressed and wine country preserved.
At the State of the City address I noted a need to bring more high paying employers to the
city.
I look forward to the challenge of keeping Temecula moving forward to an even brighter
future.
Sincerely,
Clyde Bacon
RECEIVED
MAY 19 2004
City of Temecula CITY KSDEPT.
43200 Business Park Drive Commission Appointment
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org Application
(909)694-6444
for.'prop`erconsideration,you'rtius`tkiin rif(ybea,residentofthe;.
f, r �flty of Temecula and a Registered Voter et City Temecula
Please Check One:
Planning = Community Services Public Traffic Safety
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident t0 _ Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes
NAME: Mary Jane Olhasso, CPA
ADDRESS:
DAYTIME PHONE:
EMPLOYER NAME: City of Ontario
OCCUPATION: Economic Development Director
EVENING PHONE: 909/302-9210
EMPLOYER ADDRESS: 303 East B Street Ontario, CA 91764
E-MAIL
Educational Background/Degrees:
BS Business Emphasis in Accounting - California State University Fullerton
MBA University of Redlands
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service:
Planning Commissioner - 4 years
List any organizations to which you belong (professional, technical, community service):
CORENET
CALED
CSCPA
APA
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
See Attached
1 understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for
public Info"atl n purposes Signature: �� &L"�Date: May 19, 2004
Plea e r to: Vity Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Please be aware of the advertised deadline
Mary Jane Olhasso
Planning Commission Application
May 19, 2004
It has been my honor to serve the City of Temecula as a Planning Commissioner for the
past four years. My colleagues and I have made every effort to implement the direction
of the Mayor and City Council to raise the bar for all forms of development in Temecula
resulting in the preservation and improvement of the quality of life for all residents.
I believe my role on the Commission has been to bring my experience in Finance,
Economic Development, and Real Estate to the discussions concerning short range and
advanced planning. This experience allows me to challenge developers and staff to bring
the best projects possible to produce the greatest impact on the long term value and
viability of this community.
I would appreciate the opportunity to continue this leadership effort at this critical time in
the City's history as the General Plan update process moves forward and the design
review of key residential projects, such as Roripaugh, Harveston and others are
submitted. This is the time to keep the momentum this Commission has gained for the
results the Council is expecting.
Over the past fourteen years, I have served the City of Temecula in various capacities
including the first Finance Director, Assistant City Manager and Redevelopment
Director. This position has been one of the most rewarding and I would like to express
my gratitude to the Mayor and Council and staff for the opportunity to serve.
RECEIVED
City of Temecula 2004
43200 Business Park Drive Commission Appoint
ri(}t�LE KS DEPT.
Temecula, CA 92590
www.cityoftemecula.org Application
(909)694-6444
Fot'prglSer consideration: youynr�9t,bufr@ritly bea,resldent of thg.;
chyr of Teineetila and a Re®fstered Voter Id the City of Temecula-, ,
Please Cheek One:
= Planning = Community Services Public Traffic Safety
Number of years as a City of Temecula Resident 24 Are you a City Registered Voter? Yes
NAME: John H. Telesio
ADDRESS:
DAYTIME PHONE:
EMPLOYER NAME: N/A
EMPLOYER ADDRESS:
OCCUPATION: Retired
EVENING PHONE: Same
Educational Background/Degrees:
Bachelor of Arts (BA), CSU, Los Angeles -Social Studies (History/English Majors)
Master of Science (MS), University of Southern California, Systems Management
Master of Public Administration (MPA). CSU. San Bernardino
List any City or County Board, Committee or Commission on which you have served and the year(s) of service:
Charter member, County Code Enforcement Task Force, Alt. Member, SCAG Regional Airport Aty,1985-92
Commissioner/Past Chairperson, Temecula City Public Safety/Traffic Commission, 1997-2000
Commissioner/Current Chairperson, Temecula City Planning Cotmtmission, -101>D — P
List any organizaCons t ws{Ilmc i youat ng �p�o�€ss�io�r al, `e col; co hiuni sBrVic esent
Several Military Associations including Air Force Assn., Retired Officers Assn., and American Military Assn.
Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce
Veterans of Foriegn Wars (VFW)
State why you wish to serve on this commission, and why you believe you are qualified for the position.
Please be specific. (You may attach a separate sheet of paper if necessary.)
wish to continue serving the people of Temecula as a Planning Commissioner. As such, I will strive to continue
making informed, objective and independent decisions. I consider it my obligation to be present and prepared for
each meeting. I have no personal, political or professional affiliations or conflicts of interest which could affect my
full, open and objective participation in this important process. I do have the interest, experience, education,
proven ability and desire to do the job effectively. Based on my record, I respectfully request reappointment.
I understand that any or all information on this form may be verified. I consent to the release of this information for
public information grtrposes.
Date: 05/17/04
Please r m to: City Clerk's Office, 43200 Business Park Drive (909) 694-6444 (OR)
Mail to: P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Please be aware of the advertised deadline
ITEM 23
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/ ke
ounce
FROM: Gary Thornhill, ty City Manager
DATE: June 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
PREPARED BY: Stephen Brown, Principal Planner
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council appoint two members to serve on the Civic
Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee.
BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2004 the City Council directed staff to pursue the
development of a master plan for a civic center complex that includes parking facilities, open
space/public square and a city hall. Staff is in the process of preparing a Request for
Qualifications (RFQ) for consultant services to prepare a master plan.
Part of that process involves the creation of the Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee
which is anticipated to be composed of two members of the City Council, one representative of
the Old Town Local Review Board and Executive Staff Members appointed by the City
Manager. The Old Town Local Review Board will choose a representative from its current
sitting Board.
Staff envisions that the Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee will provide an initial
"paper screening" of all the responses to the RFQ and a final interview/presentation by the final
candidates that are successful in the paper screening. If the paper screening provides the City
with many qualified candidates, there may be an intermediate face to face interview with the
candidates followed by a final interview/presentation by the finalists.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this phase of the selection process
ATTACHMENTS: None
R: BROWNS\OT Civic Center c staffryt 6-08-04AM
REQUESTS TO SPEAK
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You.
Date ,a,— � 0 1 wish to speak on Agenda Item No.
For Against
Subject:
Name: R-o f . P i
ri cy.-I
Pe-VuA
iPhone:
Address:
-
City/State/Zip:Temec,uAc,
CA J)2 10
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the
public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
Aft r completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You.
Date a I wish to speak on Agenda Item No.
For Against
Subject: /J _T '
Name Zq 4— TLA 174/A/LZ15-4 Phone:
Address: / ] City/State/Zip:(',. , (
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the
The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Plse go to the
public podium and state your name and city of residence for he record.
REQUEST TO SPEAK
CITY OF TEMECULA
After completing, please return to the City Clerk. Thank You.
Date % - 4 - o �/ I wish to speak on Agenda Item No._
For V�' Against
Subject:
k2T A/ Pr'/,g LI L %fit/}-Gc5
Name: k L R Pv"r'r(.�-A/
P
Address: City/State/Zip: "-I-Cm < c 04- n—
9i540
If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name:
The City Clerk will call your name when the matter comes up. Please go to the
public podium and state your name and city of residence for the record.