HomeMy WebLinkAboutRough Grading C
CHA -R, DONNA Y IIILLS
TO CORONA
GRADING NOTES: TO RIVERSIDE
19� ROUGH GRADING PLANS SERENP b
1. ALL GRADING SHALL CONFORM TO THEA UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, CHAPTER 70, AS AMENDED BY ORDINANCE 457. �� �P-1 PROJECTSITE
2. MINIMUM BUILDING PAD AND DRAINAGE SWALE SLOPE SHALL BE = 17' IF CUT OR FILL IS LESS THAN 10'J, 2Z
IF CUT OR FILL IS GREATER THAN 10'. DRAINAGE SWALES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 0.3' DEEP AND BE CONSTRUCTED
A MINIMUM OF 2' FROM THE TOP OF CUT OR FILL SLOPES. GENERAL
J. MAXIMUM CUT AND FILL SLOPES - 2:1. 23101 ..� z�s FoRN\P
� Opo
3 ) q
4. PROVIDE 5' WIDE OR 1' HIGH BERM OR EQUIVALENT ALONG THE TOP OF ALL FILL SLOPES OVER 5' HIGH. 7RAC7FOR NO �. t !5 GP�' R
5. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF A COMPETENT SOILS ENGINEER WHO SHALL CERTIFY
THAT ALL FILL HAS BEEN PROPERLY PLACED AND WHO SHALL SUBMIT A FINAL COMPACTION REPORT FOR ALL FILLS
RANCHO 'Qo,90 RANCHO go v
STA
6. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER SHALL SUBMIT TO THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WRITTEN CERTIFICATION
OF COMPLETION OF ROUGH GRADING IN ACCORDANCE WIIH IHE APPHUVLU GRADING PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE � ROAD
BUILDING PERMIT. CERTIFICATION SHALL BE TO LINE, GRADE, ELEVATION AND LOCATION OF CUT/FILL SLOPES.
sANriAco
7 PROVIDE A BRO* DITCH, DESIGNED TO HANDLE 100yr Q STORM FLOWS, ALONG TOP CUT OF SLOPE.
8. FINAL COMPACTION REPORT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL FILLS GREATER THAN ONE FOOT.
0
9. ALL GRADING SHALL BE DONE /N ACCORDANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIM/NARY SOILS INVESTIGATION PORTOLA
BY LEIGHTON & ASSOCIATES, DATED APRIL 12, 1988. TWO (2) SETS OF FINAL COMPACTION REPORT SHALL _
BF SUBMITTED TO THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT WHICH SHALL INCLUDE FOUNDATION DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS 79
AND CERTIFICATION INDICATING THAT GRADING HAS BEEN DONE IN CONFORMANCE WITH RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PRELIMINARY HIGHSTATE
SOILS REPORTREPORTWAY
10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT/FY THE CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AT LEAST 24 HOURS /N ADVANCE To SAN DIEGO
REQUESTING FINISHED LOT GRADE AND DRAINAGE INSPECTION.THIS INSPECTION MUST BE APPROVED PRIOR TO BUILDING
PERMIT FINAL INSPECTION FOR EACH L01-1
11. DURING ROUGH GRADING AND PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE VICINITY MAP
CONTROL SHOULD BE PROVIDED TO PREVENT PONDING OF WATER AND DAMAGE TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
12. NO FILL SHALL BE PLACED ON EXISTING GROUND UNTIL THE GROUND HAS BEEN CLEARED OF WEEDS, DEBRIS, TOPSOIL, FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA
NOT TO SCALE
AND OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ,�►�, SEE TRACT 23101--2 44-
s
13. IF STEEP SLOPING TERRAIN OCCURS UPON WHICH Fl IS T P �� __w.. 5 �
LL 0 BE LACED, IT MUST BE CLEARED, KEYED, AND N0 4
BENCHED INTO FIRM NATURAL SOIL FOR FULL SUPPORT. PREPARATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY A REGISTERED SOILSONryit ',�.. t
ENGINEER PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF FILL MATERIAL. G'� '� - - '-"� 3 G FOR GRADING IN THIS AREA
14 CUT SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 5' VERTICAL HEIGHT AND FILL SLOPES EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN 3' IN G ,U5 80 Z �� 0
3 SEE TRi4CT 23101--2
VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS OR GROUND COVER TO PROTECT THE SLOPE FROM EROSION AND �� I f 02 04 I I 8' 55 / ��
INSTABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE NO. 457 PRIOR TO THE APPROVAL OF FINAL INSPECTION. ;U:' _ tB P�
��. 8 r
7 /9
15. DUST SHALL BE CONTROLLED BY WATERING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. IV �0 539
16. ALL EXISTING DRAINAGE COURSES ON THE PROJECT SITE MUST CONTINUE TO FUNCTION, ESPECIALLY DURINGl7 -
-�- 0 9 8 .,
STORM CONDITIONS. PROTECTIVE MEASURES AND TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PROVISIONS MUST BE USED TO PROTECT �Z 85 Q �3 is -4a-
'w
15
ADJOINING PROPERTIES DURING GRADING OPERATIONS. I ~8 -44-
21 �5 ZZ
17. STABILITY CALCULATIONS WITH A FACTOR OF AT LEAST ONE AND FIVE TENTHS (1.5) SHALL BE SUBMITTED BY A I D ` ...8.�. -7+ C �- 4 �"�" Z/ .
SOIL,. ENGINEER TO THE BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT FOR CUT AND FILL SLOPES OVER 30' IN VERTICAL -53FL 2D
C
HEIGHT. /8 17 i8F�'
A CI� �j7
l �• !4 `' - 17 8 I �'� CSR "
18. A REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER OR LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR SHALL SUBMIT CERTIFICATION OF BUILDING PAG 2 I J 8 -
� ?.o � G �9 ELEVATION. WHERE SPECIFIC ELEVATIONS ARE REQUIRED, THE ELEVATION (WITH REPSECT TO MEAN SEA LEVEL) .. ! JB-
o
SHALL BE GIVEN. IF AN ELEVATION WITH RESPECT TO ADJACENT GROUND SURFACE IS REQUIRED, THE ACTUAL � � � I 3
DISTANCE ABOVE THE ADJACENT GROUND SHALL BE GIVEN. . - - 2 �3 2¢ Z3 7 �G - PACE
/ -�s� 1 s 5
• I 15
19. EROSION CONTROL. ALL GRADED SLOPES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH ROSEA ICE PLANTS AT 12" ON CENTERS I V 2/ 14 /4 Of,
OR OTHER APPROVED GROUND COVERS SLOPES OVER 15' IN VERTICAL HEIGHT, IN ADDITION TO GROUND 34 ' W - 17
Z6 Z 13 T 03"71
COVER SHALLBF. PLANT IT PR I T
G
ED WITH APPROVED TREES, SHRUBS OR COMBINATION THEREOF. SHRUBS SHALL BE Z0 1 � 7�'t �--
PLAMTED AT 10'ON CENTERSTREES, 20' ON CENTERS; COMBINATIONS, 15 ON CENTERS. SLOPES OVER 4 FEET - 11 nz IN VERTICAL HEIGHT SHALL HAVE PERMANENT IRRI GA TION SYSTEMS WITH BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES PER I `35 -• - �$ 10 v J - - AHI' N�� ,
� � �► � � w� K..�c��y � -r.Ta� �r o� wy
U.P.C., CHAPTER 10.R. 36 -f�4- /9 7 8 9 9 6 } o�t�cx� hNp fEWef,1� lmnovwzATS s�r�aN 1 16 GOT o�
a s Z /9 7 C��s u �� pis s�
20. FINISH GRADE SHALL BE SLOPED AWAY FROM ALL EXTERIOR WALLS AT NO LESS THAN 1/2 /NCH PER FOOT FOR 4 5 -�- , ,, � � ��" t `h+ �4 gVtt�T S,tip11� $��lKsThL��
A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET 2 3 �8 �� ? / -'"�' 8 �- - N p ^- �tsT ucT�b SuW'Tt*k Ai- Cllr V&9 nnA N,i f, w Lrt+ �F.
21. "NO OBSTRUCTION OF FLOOD PLAINS OR NATURAL WATER COURSES SHALL BE PERMITTED." I I - :- -�; - 4 -4r. -44. 9AI-
S'tr��u�n�Nc� - ArPPrPR��t� s't- tta•��s�N
22. ALL PROPERTY CORNERS SHALL BE CLEARLY DELINIATED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY I \ 3 `
SPACE�s 26 25 �45c.11-� /2 ¢ 5 /� �/
CONSTRUCTION/GRADING. 37 5,5 ' " S ����� • _ W.._ _ r�I� : �2�03
W%AV-WAK 411, r4
/4 / Vk5CtifuNrn: CIVIL
TRACTaro
• /g SEE SHEff 4 0
NOTICE TO CONTRACTOR. Q
-��. _
-� /4_ �--' NOTESAFETY RESPONSIBILITY,- CONTRACTOR AGREES THAT HE SHALL ASSUME SOLE AND COMPLETE RESPONSIBILITY FOR JOB `' \ �:z.. . Sym 3
SITE CONDITIONS DURING THE COURSE OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THIS PROJECT, INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND I CAN rR�l CTOR 727 IUDTII~Y f-/EN1�'�E rTC 140A A16 OF « ' ��',�
PROPERTY; THAT THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY CONTINUOUSLY AND NOT BE LIMITED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS; AND OPERA TI Q N 5 MA 1 N TEN A N C E 15`r2.4 NCH, TEL
THAT THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEFEND, INDEMNIFY AND HOLD THE OWNER, THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE ENGINEER I I AT LEAST 2 WORKING DAYS(AlfaNDA Y T14RU TEI URSD.AY'
HARMLESS FROM ANY AND ALL LIABILITY, REAL OR ALLEGED, IN CONNECT/ON WITH THE PERFORMANCE OF WORK ON THIS PRIOR ro STARTING ANY WoIzh' A/ THE VICIA11l Y OF �
PROJECT,EXCEPTING FOR LIABILITY ARISING FROM THE SOLE NEGLIGENCE OF THE OWNER, THE CITY OF TEMECULA OR I IN
THE ENGINEER. �
SEE r z �.w.a � FACILITIES. ,�
L-b03r O(oq GA, °�
EXISTING UNDERGROUND STRUCTURE. THE EXISTENCE AND LOCATION OF ANY UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES, CONDUITS OR AS SUILT C5Gllinit z
STRUCTURES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE OBTAINED BY A SEARCH OF THE AVAILABLE RECORDS.TO THE BEST OF OUR
KNOWLEDGE, THERE ARE NO EXISTING UTILITIES EXCEPT AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO AS UIT
TAKE DUE PRECAUTIONARY MEASURES TO PROTECT THE UTILITY LINES SHOWN AND ANY OTHER LINES NOT OF RECORD OR
NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAW/NGS. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO NOTIFY THE OWNERS OF THE
UTILITIES OR STRUCTURES CONCERNED BEFORE STARTING WORK. THE CONTRACTOR FURTHER ASSUMES ALL LIABILITY AND M!EWMA-Y(t)NtS R.c. 3 17 VAT'E
RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPES,CONDUITS, STRUCTURES SHOWN OR NOT SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS. THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SIGNING THESE PLANS IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSURING THE
ACCURACY AND ACCEPTABILITY OF THE DESIGN HEREON. IN THE EVENT OF DISCREPANCIES
ARISING DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE PRIVATE ENGINEER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR
UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES & USES DETERMINING AN ACCEPTABLE SOLUTION AND REVISING THE PLANS FOR APPROVAL BY
THE CIT Y.
�,pFESS z
CA U T1 0 N.- THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE Q
FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANGES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS. ALL
CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER �� ^ c)
OF THESE PLANS. , 4FIV G/NEER OF-' //� 9RK 01
o
* 273
ENA &31-03
SOILS ENGINEER'S STATEMENT: Civi
0 100 200 400 600 800 �,4kw..�w Y��i. •, ,�. ^. �: 7
BENCH MARK,
I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS PLAN IS IN SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE 4l� � ,r�: +�t� o
_.
WITH ALL THE PROVISIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SET FORTH IN THE JAY CO COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE B.M. NO. T-29-81 SCALE: 1"=200'
PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION REPORT DATED : APRIL 12, 1988 y1 1-1/2" BRASS DISC IN CONC. CYLINDER LOCATED FROM THE
AND SUPPLF_MENTAL REPORTS, INCLUDING GEOTECHNICAL REVIEW OF ROUGH r ESTJ�,gTEQ INTERSECTION OF FRONT ST. AND RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, 1.8
GRAQING PLANS DATED JAN. 9, 1990. AMD UP�A'TF� REPORT D/4TeD /1lJGutT z7,X998, ��, No.2382 � MILES N.E. ON RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD TO THE INTERSECTION OF
_ U
r EXP.� EARTHWORK QUAl1/T/T/ES. LD�9 2rv5GR
3 S-14?9 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND MARGARITA ROAD, IN THE N.W.
���OTL�CHN��t• CUT 375,400 (;+Y. CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION 1' E. OF A 7' CHA/NLINK FENCE, 21'
A OF p��F X 16 AROUND S0. CALIF. GAS VALVES, 40 N. OF P.P. (N0.#) 94 LD-9q- /(05-qR o
FILL 378,400 C.Y. N. OF THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, FIBERGLASS
WITNESS POST SET 1 W. OF MONUMENT.
N
ADJ. DATE 9-13-82 ELEV. 1128.4 10 �0- �?4 _ `/8
DEVELOPER: BASIS OF BEARINGS: REVISIONSt APPR, DATE APPROVED BY, DRAWN BY- ____pB PREPARED BY- � �
SOILS ENGINEER: � � ems, �� s�v�,�� TRACTS N0. 23 10 1-3, '�, 5, b SHEET
L ENNQ R pomEs DF' REACT!VATS GR.4 D//VG PERMIT ICOR TRACT [ESIGNED BY Pa ms.µ p� 'Q°' CITY OF TEI►iIECU 1
REGISTERED C lL ENGINEER N0. 273fifi
CAL/��RN/A THE BEARI NGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON A Z13101-5 6 C14A/V G L 46/V S/LACER OF 141,GR/< $ l! 7
LE/GHTON & ASSOC/AYES 7 EXP, MARCH 3� 1993 REVIEWED BY BE
PORTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF KAISER PARKWAY DA TE,_ / 99 SCHEDULE "A"
AS SHOWN ON PARCEL MAP LA0. 21884 FILED IN BOOK S� IV 7 5.�. GJ /' APPRO D BY, I SCALE: BENCH MARK: OF S SHTS.
24800 C�/.2/SANTA IVIVE" 4176 9 ENr9*,2P,P/S,6C/,2CL€w 144, PAGES 24 THROUGH 33 OF PARCEL MAPS 1N ROUGH GRADING PLANS
SUI 7-5 20o SU17E 102 THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF RIVERSIDE �H 2 DEPUTY ITY EN INFER
MISS/Oiv V/5.10,CA 9269/ r�M�CuC�4,rA 92590 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING NO 1' 40' 00"W. REVISE PAD E V LOT 2 f A5 BUILT)SHEET 3 �•?.,3-G� CITY of TEMECULA - TITLE SKEET FILE No.
(9¢9)598-$5O0 DOUGLAS M. STEWNFcT AS SHAWN SLE ABOVE
• DA TEf / 3� q/ R.C.E. 37254. EXP. 6-�30-92 SECTION 28, 29, 3� & 33, T.7S .,R2W
�E
AIMMiksm
zm
10111111111111111111
IN
P.
1 416
IN
MINN
oulwm
4F I
� .
.. . , , . w:
® �
-
s
. .,�,
.:
,n ke MFIIIIIII&� mss..
� . , . .. ..
- �
s�
,,®,. .,.w .tea .
s eai
A.
Immmmmm
„ . • .. - . .
AA
lAm
AA
AIIIIII
Ar
IIIIIIMT�ltf 01. 1 NONE==
a e:�..t
Ell
IN
11 AA -
A A
®�.
. ..
o...�
MEW” A
MIN
All A A Ar
,.
. ,
, ;H ,ir ,.
4 bill
wi� IN
A iN
,.n.i4libblill
.,,
�
„•
®.
� li lip
IL
11 LL bill
MCI
Pr �NiiPb—
Opt
fib
q 2v
t N: IL PIPPIN IiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiZ
off
P, common
m.
N .vn.,.e �.,�, v . .
WIN
IL
14A ZNNNNNN�A
mum
R/W R W
9011
20' MIN. B.S L. 45' 45'
1566' 15'
44' 62' MIN.
11' 22' 22' 11'
' 14' Z2' 18' 22' 14' P�� FILL BLANKET
fi. 6 s �� AS NEEDED COMPACTED _
LEVEL LINE 2' `�-0 6' LEVEL LINE 9' 9' 6' PILE OQ
AD ELEV. 6" CURB
A.C. PAVEMENT D. 1 1' 1.5 TYP. .�
�s z 1/4"/1 8" U rl/,4-/l rr f P'' ��- 0.39'FT. C RB 2.0x ---zQX 8" CURBD. 5
_______�� -- _- �___ _ 1 PROJECTED PROM T
0.3' I _
............
�' / �
' DE OF
• - � BACK CUT
� �.� SLOPE TO APPROVED
BENCHING GROUND BENCH SLOPE_
BASE COURSE 1.6 COMPACTED
PRD ECTED
NATIVE MATERIAL / G ADE '
ROUGH GRADE LINE 0.3 UNSUITABLE
8" CURB NATURAL GROUND MATERIAL
TYPICAL STREET SECTION 44' CIC (8" CURB)
RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD 104 T.1.-5.5 Z 1 SLOPE BENCH 6' MIN. BENCH HEIGHT VARIES
t 5X MIN. (TYP) B
CH
ROUGH GRADE LINE � lI (TYPICAL)
PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS AND AHERN LANE
TYPICAL ROUGH GRADE SECTION 90' R/W -- 62' C/C KEY DEPTH 2X M/N. --
2' MIN. KEY
PARDUCCI LANE DEPTH LOWER BENCH
(KEY)
20' MIN. B.S.L.
BENCHING DETAIL
15, 40, 15� FILL SLOPES
SLOPE BUTTRESS OR REPLACEMENT FILL DETAIL
1 20' 20' 10'
6' s'
2' LEM LINE 2'
�. �+ A.C. PAVEMENT 0.20' 1.51TYP. AD ELEV.
F7: 8" CURB 7X 1.7.X 8" CURB- 1/4"/1Fr
--_-__- • - ------------ 1.1
.y 0.3'
BASE COURSE 1.677' -.
.6 ' NA11YE'Y41EW NATURAL GROUND
ROUGH GRADE LINE ET Y WOLY
TYPICAL STREET SECTION 40' CIC (8" CURB) R R/W �
RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD 104 T.1.=5.5
OPEN SPACE 100
LANDSCAPING 50 50
CULBERTSON LANE 2' 76 UNSUITABLE '
MATERIAL MIN.
12' 38 38 12'
6, gyp`' 30" MIN.
LEVEL LINE Q� COMPAC OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT
FILL
A.C. PAVEMENT A � DEEPER OVEREXCAVAT70N do RECOMPACTION SHALL BE PREFORMED
IF DETERMINED TO BE NECESSARY BY THE GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT.
20' MIN. B.S.L. _!14 20X '1 49 1��:f� �p`
15' 60' 15' I� 3'--'O" CUT-FILL L O T
40' ,-. \
10' 20' 20' 10' 0.3' 7/
fi, 6,
2' LEVEL LINE 2' BASE COURSE � 1.01
COWACTED
/W11VE A41Tt7i�lC
A.C. PAVEMENT 0.03' 1'S'T �p� AD ELEV. ROUGH GRADE LINE TYPICAL ROUGH GRADE SECTION
6" CURB 6" CU I114-11' FT.
�• 1.TX RBMEADOWS PARKWAY .�
...................
....... ................ ...
0.31
2'1 a '.00
a
BASE COURSE 1.67/ A647W W1EM „
ROUGH GRADE LINE 6"X6"-W.L 4 X W.L 4 NATURAL GROUND
TYPICAL STREET SECTION 40' CIC (6" CURB)
w.W.M. _
RIVERSIDE COUNTY STANDARD 104 T L-5.
SEBASTIAN/ CIRCLE AND WEIBEL CIRCLE AND BURGESS COURT..
CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS "B" FLOW LINE AS 5'
SLOPE BUTTRESS N O TES: OR GUN/N/TE. SHO WN ON PLAN. Ml
1. KEY DEPTH PER REPORT/PLANS, SUBJECT TO FIELD CHANGE (2' MIN) --
30" MIDI.
2. KEY WIDTH PER REPORT/PLANS, SUBJECT TO FIELD CHANGE (MINIMUM COMPACTED OVEREXCAVATE AND RECOMPACT
WIDTH NORMALLY GOVERNED BY EQUIPMENT SIZE - GENERALLY DOWN DRAIN AND INTERCEPTOR DRAIN15 FEE T) . FILL OR
K PER REPORT PLANS, J LLU��M�
J.
BAC CUT E LA S, SUB ECT TO FIELD CHANGE (GENERALLY C UNWEATHERED BEDROCK OR MATERIAL
1:1 OR FLATTER) �ToPsoi�' APPROVED BY SOIL ENGINEER
4. FILL BLANKET 30" MIN. OR PER REPORT PLANS, SUBJECT TO FIELD CHANGE.
AS P)IJiLI f_Nr'NtER CUT LOT �ry
LEGEND -5 101N ,
B.C. BEGIN CURVE = ----
B.V.C. BEGIN VERTICAL CURVET Po FESS/aN
B.W. BACK OF WALK SEE EARTH BERM :. - � �' '�
Cb. CURB DETAIL HEREON. �� C/ 2
,z-
C.F. UR FAC ,f rn
CURB E
E.C. END CURVE CHANGE �
Lu NO4V-17 rn
E.V.C. END VERTICAL CURVE PLAN14EW F'NG INFER OF NORK: cc� ' COMPACTED O
� �' 1 �0 z_
FF FINISH FLOOR FILL
F.L. FLOW LINE Lor No. (I _ o0
F.G. F/NISH GRADE 1 VARIES 25' Min. " 1,1 d
E
PAD EV. (IYP. 4, 'k.qtBENCH SLOPES
F.S. FINISH SURFACE R/w J MA g40VA/V A. 701-IN15, R.C.E, 2!
G. OR Gr. GRADE 1151.0 1155.0 FLOWUNE 10 or 12 VARIES
G.B. GRADE BREAK ELEV SEE PLAN FINISHED GRADE _
G.F. GARAGE FLOOR RAT PAD FLAT PAD a
H.P. HIGH POINT OF PROTECTIVE SWALE
INV. INVERT
10' MIN.
M.C. OR M.0.C. MID POINT OF CURVRW LINE P0� NATURAL GROUND
E SX
tj
P.I. POINT OF INTERSECTION �
6'
P.L. OR PROPERTY LINE T.C. ELEV. FINISHED 01
MIN
BENCH BENCH HEIGHT VAR/E5
P.O.C. POINT ON CURVE 1�' M/N./10xMAX. 15' M/N. SEE PLAN GRADE (TYPICAL)
P.R.C. POINT OF REVERSE CURVE o.3 2% v
T.C. TOP OF CURB oLe
`� �q� 2X MIN. p
T.F. TDP OF FOOTING �• Q" '�G �G`�" ROUGH GRADE ' MIN. � T�R�AL
T.S. TOP OF SLOPE f
T.W. TOP OF WALL - SECTION "H_H" S��TPB 12' MIN.
(918.56) EXISTING GRADE OR ELEVATION ,
ll� LOWER BENCH �
908.76 PROPOSED FINISH GRADE Q)
CUT DAYLIGHT LINE o � a
-- --- - TYPICAL LOT DRAINAGE �a� � `�
FILL �` GRANULAR SOIL CUT FACE
NOT TO SCALE �i,. M. W (M/N. SAND EQUIVALENT OF 30) BENCHING DETAIL
rr 6' WOOD FENCE �� OVERSIZE TO FILL VOIDS DENSIFIED 5j'� ,k-.
'� MATERIAL .) BY FLOODING. ;::;: _
r�C= CONCRETE BLOCK WALL (RETAINING) Q� `''` FILL OVER CUT SLOPES
----X CHAIN LINK FENCE .�
T.B. TOP OF BERM NOTE: ALL 2:1 SLOPES ARE SHADED. cc 30 6ENCHING NOTES:
Exp. 3 33s6 OVERSIZE MATERIAL DISPOSAL 1. LOWER BENCH. TO BE INSPECTED BY GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT PRIOR TO
F.H. FIRE HYDRANT 93 _ _ E L D O,..,ALDETAIL PLACEMENT OF FILL. o
,.... SLC77ON A AN
4 MA IL BOX POST WITH INDICATION OF THE �• .i:w
NUMBER OF LOTS BEING SERVED �'Q� COMPACTED L O • 94-- /8/ GR
STREET LIGHTS EARTH BERM
PAD REVISIONS: APPROVED BY- PREPARED BY.
� APPR. DATE � DRAWN BY- D.E.CARTER
Pv �, _ „--- D 5 as Pte, TRACTS NO. 23101 SHEET
S�0.1 R�aCT/V�4TE I�//VG JeiPM/T FAR TI?•4 C T.S _ DESIGNED BY-
2:1 SLOPES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 2 _ REGISTERED CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 27366 pyo, cA,gz.j23 CITY OF TEMECULA 5
__�23/O/--5 6� C�fA/V GE �/V G//VEER OF W�I�C !! EXP. MARCH 31, 1993 REVIEWED BY �5d�5O5-aq..35
DATE. T 1996 SCHEDULE "A"
EARTH BERM DETA-�-
DENOTES EXIST. CONTOURS NOT TO SCALE APPR D BY- �� SCALE.• BENCH MARK: ROUGH GRADING PLANS of 5 stirs.
710 LM _
DEPUTY ENGINEER DETAIL SHEET
CITY OF WMECULA AS SHOWN SEEs H T Z FILE NO.
DOUGLAS M. STEWART SECTION 28, 29, 32 & 33, T.7S .,R2W
DA TE, j R.C.E. 37254. EXP. 6-30-92
349-/46-06