HomeMy WebLinkAbout080404 PC Agenda
C;INyJ
. fI" ., In compliance with the Americans with Disabiiities Act, if you need speciai assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Cierk (909) 694-6444.
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibiiity to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
.
.
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
AUGUST 4,2004 - 6:00 P.M.
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2004-039
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Commissioner Oihasso
Roll Call:
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form shouid be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, piease come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary Q.d.Qr: to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time iimit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
Ail matters iisted under Consent Caiendar are considered to be routine and ail wiil be
enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items uniess
. Members' of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of August 4, 2004
R :IPLA N COM MlAg end as \2004 108-04-04. d oc
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
.
2.1 Approve the Minutes of May 19, 2004
2.2 Approve the Minutes of June 2, 2004
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for June 2004
COMMISSION BUSINESS
4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0440 Public Convenience and Necessity Findinqs. submitted
by Greq Strinqer on behalf of Strinqer's. 42210 Zevo Drive. Dan Lone. Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity
5 Planninq Application No. PA04-0442 Public Convenience and Necessity Findinqs, submitted
by John Hamilton on behalf of Stellar Cellar. 28636 Old Town Front Street, Dan Lonq.
Associate Planner
.
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve Findings of Public Convenience or Necessity
6 Planninq Application No. PAOO-0507 an Administrative Development Plan. submitted by
Larry Markham, to modify an exterior material and colors for a previously approved three-
stOry. 31.600 square foot, 56-unit hotel buildinq on 1.35 acres. located approximately 200
feet east of Jefferson Avenue and 200 feet north of Winchester Road. Matthew Harris,
Associate Planner
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Approve Administrative Development Plan
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
.
R :\P LANCOM MlAgendas\2004 \08-04-04. doc
.
.
.
New Items
7 Planninq Application No. PA04-0477 a Development Code Amendment to amend a portion
of Chapter 17.08 of the City of Temecula. Municipal Code establishinq additional
pertormance standards requlatinq office use in Liqht Industrial Zones, Dale West, Associate
Planner
8 Planninq Application No. PA04-0111 a Development Plan, submitted by Gabric and
Associates, to construct a 37,970 square foot warehouse and storaqe facility on 2.01 acres,
located on the north side of Winchester Road, approximately 1.838 feet west of Dial Road,
Dan Lona. Associate Planner
9
Planninq Application No. PA02-0661. a Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan,
submitted by Calvary Baptist Church, to construct a 12.610 square foot two-stOry church
facility addition consistinq of sanctuary, classrooms. offices, remodeled main entrance.
multi-purpose room and pad for future parsonaqe on 5.0 acres, located at 31087 Nicolas
Road, Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
10 Planninq Application PA03-0723 a Development Plan. submitted by MCA Architects. to
construct two sinqle-story retail buildinqs consistinq of 6.480 and 6.870 square feet
respectively on two parcels totalina 1.3 acres, located on the northwest corner of Overland
Drive and Maraarita Way. Matthew Harris. Associate Planner.
11 Planninq Application PA04-0384. an amendment to a Planned Development Overlay,
submitted by David Moscato, to revise the schedule of permitted uses for PDO-4, Temecula
Creek Villaqe, to permit the sale of alcohol in the Villaqe Commerical area, located on the
south side of Hiqhway 79 South between Jedediah Smith and Avenida De Missiones. Emery
Papp, Senior Planner
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: August 18, 2004
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
R :IPLA NC OM MlAgendas \2004108-04-04. doc
.
ITEM #2
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
- PLANNING COMMISSION
MAY 19, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:02 P.M., on
Wednesday, May 19, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Businèss Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Mathewson led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Chairman
Telesio.
Absent:
None.
Chairman Telesio announced that per the Fire Department Code, there is a legal capacity for
only one seat per person and that if necessary there is overilow seating in the Main Conference
Room.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Ms. Carol Marsden, 30955 de Portola Road, expressed concern with an esthetically unpleasing
Happy Mover van at. the residence of 31580 Pio Pico; and stated that it is offensive to the
neighborhood and would request that Code Enforcement explore the removal of the Happy
Mover van.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1
Approve the Agenda of May 19, 2004.
2
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
R:IMinutesPCI051904
2.1
Approve the Minutes of April 7, 2004.
.
Chairman Telesio requested to move Item No.6 before Item No.5
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve the Consent Calendar and to move Item
No.6 before Item No.5. Commissioner Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Continued from Apri/21, 2004
3 Plannina Application No. PA03-0725, submitted by Davidson Communities, is a product
review for 99 detached sinqle-family residences within Planninq Area 2 in the Roripauqh
Ranch Specific Plan, located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road and west of the future
ex1ension of Butteriield Staqe Road (Tract 29661-2)
Associate Planner Long presented a brief staff report (of record), noting the following:
That staff has reviewed the revised plans and determined that while some of the
concerns of the Planning Commission have been addressed, the following issues
identified by staff and the Commission have not been addressed:
0 Conditions Nos. 12, 15, 19, and 20 have not been implemented; that these
conditions deal with arched focal points, variation in the roof plans, and the use
of additional materials such as brick for the Spanish or Monterey styles;
.
0
Massing on Plan Two (2) has not been addressed;
0 Window spacing and windows with single shutters have not been addressed;
0 Entry doors have not been expanded in width (optional doors are proposed,
however, they do not vary in shape or width and glass was not proposed);
0 That the applicant has re-plotted the plans along Brush Creek Drive, however
there is no net loss or gain of any single plan;
That the elimination of the second-story portion of Plan Two (2) be added to the
Conditions of Approval.
That staff has prepared conditions of approval to include the remaining Planning
Commission's recommendation and that staff is recommending approval as conditioned.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Bill Davidson, 1302 Camino Del Monte, of Davidson Communities relayed that the applicant
does not concur with staff in regard to pulling the fence and pilaster back and would request to
leave as conditioned, and is of the opinion that the proposed project is in conformance and is
requesting approval of the plans as submitted.
.
R:\MinulesPCI051904
2
.
.
.
Ms. Linda Beaudon, 22380 Alameda Del Monte, expressed concern with the lack of single-story
homes along the ridgeline and stated that she was of the opinion that there would be more
single-story residences in the proposed project.
For clarification purposes, Mr. Long noted that the direction from the Planning Commission to
the City Council was to require single-story products throughout the single family residential
areas; that the City Council modified the language to state "as determined by the marker' and
that staff would be of the opinion thàt the proposed project has sufficient single-story elements
and meets the intent of the design guidelines in the Specific Plan (SP).
Mr. Long also noted that a single-story element would be a portion of the residence that is not
two-stories high.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff relayed that it would be his opinion that the applicant has complied with
many of the requests but 'does not agree with Condition of Àpproval No. 21, (fencing on corner
lots shall be pulled back towards the rear on exterior corner lots to open up the exposed
elevation to the street as determined acceptable by the Planning Director). .
Commissioner Guerriero echoed Commissioner Chiniaeff's comments and is in agreeance with
staff's Conditions of Approval except for Condition of Approval No. 21.
Commissioner Olhasso also echoed the previous two comments and expressed appreciation
with the work that Davidson's Communities has done with the proposed project; and requested
that staff notify the Planning Commissioners when the City Council makes substantial changes
to their recommendations. .
Commissioner Mathewson concurs with the above mentioned comments but noted his concern
with the two-story massing on Plan 2 and is of the opinion that the number of Plan twos (2) and
threes (3) adjacent to one another has not been addressed and would request that staff explore
the issue.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson move staff's recommendation as presented as well as
the deletion of Condition of Approval No. 21 as presented above.
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern with the removal of 'the second-story element on
Plan Two (2).
At this time, the Public Hearing was reopened.
Mr. Davidson relayed that it would be his opinion the proposed project is in conformance of the
Specific Plan. '
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the
exception of Commissioner Chiniaeff and Commissioner Olhasso who voted No.
R:\MinulesPCI051904
3
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004-022
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO, PA03-0725 A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR 99 DETACHED
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 2 OF
THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED SOUTH
OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS TRACT
MAP 29661-2
.
4 Planninq Application No. PA03-0634, submitted by Meeker Companies, is a product review
for 113 detached sinqle-family residences within Planninq Area 4B in the Roripauqh Ranch
Specific Plan, located south of Murrieta Hot Sprinqs Road and west of the future extension
of Butteriield Staqe Road. (Tract 29661-5)
Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
That staff reviewed the revised plans and it was determined that while the revised plans
have addressed some of the concerns of the Planning Commission, a number of
outstanding issues have not been addressed;
That staff has added some additional recommendations which have been included in the
Conditions of Approval;
That the recommended enhancements are a result of comments from the Planning
Commission hearing;
.
That a Resolution of Approval has been attached for your consideration;
That in reviewing the revised elevations staff has noted the following enhancements:
0 That the front elevation of each architectural style of Plan Two (2) has been
revised to break up the wall plane above the garage;
0 That the left elevation of Plan Two has been revised to include one additional
window on the second floor and the right elevation has been revised to include
two (2) windows on the second floor;
0 That the left elevation of Plan Three (3) has been revised to include one
additional window on the first floor and one additional window on the second
floor; and that three additional windows have been proposed on the second floor
of the right elevation;
0 That the left elevation of Plan Four (4) has been revised to include one additional
window on the second floor and one additional window on the second floor of the
rear elevation;
That the intent of adding additional windows would be to break up the large expanses of
wall;
That staff is recommending as a Condition of Approval, that the applicant provide only
the enhanced elevations; that the standard elevation should not be used due to the
language in the Specific Plan (SP), which states "articulation shall be provided on all
.
R:IMinutesPCIO51904
4
.
.
.
sides of the homes ("four-sided architecture")"; that staff is of the opinion that the
standard elevations do not meet the articulation or the four-sided architecture standards;
That the following issues identified by staff and the Planning Commission of items of
concern, have not been addressed: '
.0 Additional variation of the garage placement and garage door style ,for each plan
has not been proposed; . '
0 The appearance of two front elevàtions has not been proposed and; ,
0 The roof design/silhouette does not offer a significant level of variation within
each plan.
That staff has ,added the Conditions of Approval to ensure these changes are made,
which would bring each product into conformance with the intent of the Design
Guidelines and that staff is recommending the Planning Commission approve the project
with the attached Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearin9was opened.
Mr. M. J. Knitter, representing the applicant relayed the following:
That since the last Planning Commission meeting of April 21, 2004, the applicant has
taken the comments of the Planning Commission and have enhanced a number of the
areas on the sides and rears, revised the second-elevation on the second floor, moved
the egress window (which was on the front of the window) and m"oved it to the side; and
that smaller design element windows were added to the front;
That on all corner conditions, there will be a one"story plan; and that a gable could'be
added for enhancement purposes if it is the will of the Commission;
That six (6) garage door variatiçms will be provided for the home buyer;
That the landscaping and fencing will be taken care of by the landscape architect;
That windows to sides were added to Plan Two (2), Plan Three (3), and Plan Four (4);
That in regard to the four-sided architecture, the applicant is of the opinion that the front
elevations of all plans comply with the intent of the Architectural Guidelines; ,
That there will be enhanced elevations on the rear of every residence along the
ridgeline, every residence that abuts the street, and on all corners;
That on Plan One (1) the applicant would request to stay with thè ridge running front to
back;'
That on Plan Two (2) there will be a hip roof condition which will be on all three of the
elevations;
R:IMinulesPC1051904
5
That on Plan Three (3) there will be a hip roof on the front; that on the side of the
elevation the rear is a gable roof and that if it were the will of the Commission a hip could
be added to the back 3b which would match the front of the b;
.
That on Plan 4, there will be a hip roof on all three elevations;
That on the Spanish Revival, the applicant would propose to use a lace finish on stucco
versus a 20/30 sand finish noting that a 20/30 sand finish is difficult to use, extremely
expensive and that the applicant would like to avoid the call back that the 20/30 sand
finish will entail;
That the applicant would request to use an "S" tile concrete tile roof on the Spanish
Revival versus a barrel tile clay roof;
That if it were the will of the Commission, the applicant could add a hip on the profile of
the roofs on 3b.
Director of Planning Ubnoske clarified that the Design Guidelines for Spanish Revival call out for
a Barrel Tile clay roof.
Mr. George Zeeber, representing Meeker Companies noted that he needed clarification for the
following Conditions of Approval:
Item No. 30 relating to paseos:
.
For Mr. Zeeber, Mr. Hazen relayed that Item No. 30 is based on the terms of the development
agreement and the Conditions of Approval of the Specific Plan.
Mr. Long further clarified that the master developer has some responsibility to implement the
paseos and landscaping in various areas prior to the individual merchant builders being able to
pull building permits.
Item No. 32, 45, and 47.
Ms. Ubnoske clarified that Item No. 32, 45, and 47 would not be for private lots.
Mr. M. J. Knitter relayed that he will work with staff to enhance the sides on corner lots to give
the appearance of a second front elevation.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Olhasso expressed disappointment with the proposed project and suggested that
the applicant work with staff to improve the outdated appearance of the residences.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to continue this item to an indefinite period of time.
This motion died for a lack of a second.
.
R:IMinutesPCI051904
6
.
.
.
Commissioner Guerriero also expressed disappointment with the proposed project stating that a
lot of time and effort has gone into the implementation of the Design Guidelines and the Specific
Plan (SP) and queried why the Design Guidelines and Specific Plan are not being followed.
Director of Planning Ubnoske stated that staff is satisfied with the project as conditioned; that if
the Planning Commission were to approve the proposed project with the conditions that staff
has placed on it, it would then be consistent with the Specific Plan (SP); and that the other
option would be to continue this item off calendar to have the applicant continue to work with
staff.
Commissioner Olhasso apologized to staff, the Commission, and to the developer, but noted
that she would not be able to approve the project as proposed. '
. MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner
Chiniaeff seconded the motion subject to the proposed conditions stated by staff, that the land
developer construct the paseos as it is required in the existing Specific Plan, and that the
applicant upgrade for an architectural elevation for all sidè lots on corners where they occur on
all plans. Commissioner Mathewson amended his motion to include Commissioner Chiniaeff's
requests voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Olhasso and
Commissioner Guerriero who voted No. .
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-023
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO, PA03-0634' A PRODUCT REVIEW FOR 113 DETACHED
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 4B
OF THE, RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN LOCATED
SOUGHT OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD, KNOWN AS
TRACT MAP 29661-5
New Items
Planninq Application PA03-0027, submitted by Cornwall Associates Architects, is a
Conditional Use Permit to construct. establish and operate a 24, 287 square foot church
facility located on the north side of Pauba Road and 140 feet west of Corte Villosa (APN:
955-050-017) ,
This item will be addressed after Item No.6 per the request of the Commission.
. '
5
6
Planninq Application PA03-0534 submitted bY McArdle and Associates Architects is a
Development Plan to construct an 18,981 square-foot. three-story office buildinQ on 1.01
acres. Located in the north side of Ridqe Park Drive, south of Rancho California Road.
(APN: 940-310-027)
Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (~s per agenda material), noting the following:
That the proposed project is for 'a three-story office building; and that it is located on the
site interior loop portion of Ridge Park Drive that wraps around the site;
R:\MinulesPCl051904
7
That there are two existing transformers located on each side of the driveway entrance;
that due to slop restraints it would not be feasible to relocate the driveway; and that the
applicant has proposed plantings around the transformers to soften their appearance;
.
That the first floor of the building includes underground parking which provides direct
access into the building via elevator and stairs;
That there will be vehicular access to the first floor parking structure on the east and
west sides of the building which creates two-way circulation throughout the project site;
That the project requires 57 parking spaces which are being proposed by the applicant;
That the applicant is proposing to exceed the Floor Area Ratio (FAR) standard which is
.40; and that the applicant is proposing .45 FAR;
That staff is of the opinion that the proposed project includes exceptional materials,
design, and landscaping that would qualify the project for an increase in FAR;
That the elevations that are included in the Commission packet are for a blue reflective
glass and that the applicant has revised it to a green color (at this time a sample was
distributed to the Commission);
That the proposed project is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
and that staff would be recommending approval.
.
For the Commission, Fire Marshal McBride relayed that the proposed project meets the fire
code requirements under section 903 of the fire code as well as meeting the practicality of the
requirements; that the Fire Department will have access to both sides of the building as well as
the front of the building for aerial apparatus; and that the Fire Department is of the opinion that
they c°!-lld adequately protect both the occupants and building.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff recommendation. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004-026
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO, PA03-0534M A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 29,622
SQUARE FOOT THREE STORY OFFICE BUILDING ON 1.01
ACRES, LOCATED ON RIDGE PARK DRIVE, SOUTH OF
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, KNOWN AS APN: 940-310-027
New Item
5 Planninq Application PA03-0027. submitted by Cornwall Associates Architects, is a
Conditional Use Permit to construct. establish and operate a 24, 287 square foot church
facility located on the north side of Pauba Road and 140 feet west of Corte Villosa (APN:
955-050-017)
.
R:IMinutesPCI051904
8
.
.
.
Assistant City Attorney Curly relayed that the applicant posted photo simulations of what is
perceived to be the after affect.
At this time the Commission took a 15 minute break.
Assistant City Attorney clarified what a Public Hearing is stating that the Planning
Commission will be making decisions based on the City's laws, State Planning and Zoning
Laws, and Federal Laws; and also explained Religious Land Use and Institutionalized
Persons Act (RLUIPA).
For the Commission; Ms. Ubnoske clarified what correspondence the .Commission should
have.
Associate Planner Harris presented a staff report (as per agenda material), noting the
following:
That the applicant is proposing a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Devèlopment
Plan to construct, establish, and operate a 24',287 square foot church facility
including a sanctuary, multi-purpose room, classrooms, meeting rooms; and that the
subject property is located on the north side of Pauba Road and 140 feet west of
Corte Villosa;
That the proposed project is 4.72 acres in size and that currently the site is vacant;
, .
That there are existing single-family residences to the east that back up to the
proposed property line;
That the north and west side of the proposed project is vacant and to the south there
are 'existing single-family residential residences, part of the Paloma Del Sol Specific
Plan (SP);
That the facility has been sited in the center of the property so as to reduce impacts
on adjacent properties; that approximately 170-foot wide setback has been achieved
between the building and the eastern property lines; that setbacks of 108 feet and
170 feet have been achieved from the north and west property lines; and that these
setbacks far exceed the minimum 10-foot wide setback that is required by the
Development Code and that staff is of the opinion that the setbacks serve as ample
buffers between adjacent residences and the proposed facility;
That there will be a 20 foot landscape buffer proposed along the eastern property
line;
That there will be a 10' to 20' wide landscape buffer on both the north and the west
sides of the property;
That in addition, the applicant is proposing 18' tall parking lot poles with cut-off
fixtures that would force the light downward into the parking lot area and to the
landscaped area to the east;
R:IMinutesPCI051904
9
That landscaping being proposed will be adjacent to each side of the two driveways
that would serve to screen the parking lot from Pauba Road;
.
That a colonial architectural style is being proposed for the church facility; that a
cupola is being proposed out towards the front of the structure that will serve to
breakup the roofline; and with the cupola incorporated into the structure it would be
50 feet tall, which complies with the building height requirements in the very low
zoning district;
That the height and scale of the proposed church facility will be different from the
surrounding residences; however, with the large building setbacks and landscaped
buffers being proposed, staff is of the opinion that the facility will be compatible with
the surrounding single-family residences;
That the building will be covered in brick to give the appearance of a colonial
architectural element; that it will be a cross cable building style with the gable ends
treated with decorative columns and siding, and decorative window treatment to
bring out the architectural style;
That the proposed church facility will be constructed as a stake center; that the a
Stake center accommodates three church wards; and that a ward consists of
approximately 100 families or 500 to 600 people;
That a sanctuary area, offices, a multipurpose area with a stage, a basketball court
area, a variety of Sunday school classrooms, and meeting rooms are being
proposed;
.
That based on calculations provided by the architect, there will be 287 fixed seats
proposed within the sanctuary area; and that the Development Code requires 96 on
site parking spaces (overilow parking has been factored in); that in terms of parking,
the applicant complies with the Development Code;
That non-fixed seating will be provided for overilow potential in the multipurpose
room when necessary;
That staff determined that the project complies with all other applicable Development
standards such as building height, lot coverage, and landscaping;
That there was an initial study periormed for the project site resulting in three (3)
impacts identified that had potential to be significant, Air quality, Cultural Resources,
and TransportationfTraffic; however, mitigation measures have been applied to them
which have subsequently reduced them from being significant;
However, there have been mitigation measures specified in the traffic study, the first
of which is a half-width improvement of Pauba Road along the entire width of the
project site; the second mitigation measure would be a locked gate across the
eastern property line to prohibit vehicles from entering during the evening hours, and
that the iast item would be the payment of both TUMPF and signal mitigation fees;
.
R:IMinutesPCI051904
10
.
.
.
That the applicant provided a new operational statement (see staff report) which
further clarifies how many people will be associated with the various activities on the
property; and that based on the new operational statement provided, staff has
drafted an additional Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Conditions of Approval (see
staff report).
For Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Harris relayed that it is his opinion that the surrounding
residences have received an operations matrix.
For Commissioner Mathewson.. Director of Planning Ubnoske clarified that as a result of the
new statement of operations and the changes to the Conditions of Approval, a temporary use
permits is not required for any of the uses, and that staff reviewed the detailed revised
statement of operations and concurred that the activities and events could be accommodated in
the proposed building.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the applicant would not require the use
of a temporary use permit for the bi-annual Stake Conference.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Principal Engineer Moghadam relayed that at ultimate build-out,
Pauba Road would be able to carry'31 ,000 vehicles a day; that if there are any delays of traffic
due to the proposed project, it will be at the driveways of the proposed project, noting that there
will be full movement. from both driveways.
Mr. Moghadam also relayed that a Level of Service (LOS) Q would condition a project for
signalization; and that the CIP has a design uriderWay for Rancho Vista and Meadows Parkway
which will be going to bid .In the near future.
Deputy Director Parks clarified that the widening of Pauba Road in front of Linfield School is a
condition on its project; and that the Temecula Valley High School expansion project will be
conditioned to widen Pauba for their whole frontage.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Moghadam relayed that the Level of Service (LOS) on Pauba
Road with the improvements of Temecula Valley High School factored in, would be ð or §.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Kent Cornwall, of Cornwall Associates Architects, provided the following history and
thoroughness of the process up until the Public Hearing:'
That the church acquired the property in 1997 with the intent of building this type of
facility on the property;
That Cornwall Arc~itects was contacted by the applicant in early 2002 when it was
ready to move forward with the project; and a pre-application was started to inquire
what the City's procedures would be as far as building plans, appearance, and
statement of operations; "
That the applicant received comments from staff requesting not typically required items
such as an acoustical study, a lighting study, and a traffic analysis; and at that time, the
concerns of staff were ingress and egress of the property, and the comparison of the
R:\MinutesPCIO51904
11
zone use (which is very low density residential) and the proposed use being for a
church; and that staff requested other standard requests;
.
That at that time, Cornwall Architects recommended that the applicant meet with the
surrounding neighbors (particularly the neighbors adjacent to the east) early on to
discuss the proposed project;
That Cornwall Architect has been working with these type of facilities (churches) for
over 30 years and understand the process, concerns, and sensitivities of the
neighborhoods they enter into;
That on August 4, a meeting was scheduled with the residences of Corte Villosa who
would be most affected by the proposed project; that representatives of the church and
construction people were present to discuss the proposed project; that renderings, floor
plans, and a video showing examples of the quality of construction and maintenance
that will be involved was shown; and that at that time, the church representatives took
four (4) pages of notes of concerns expressed by residences; and that as a plans
developed, the church attempted to incorporate mitigating measures to the neighbors
concerns into the project;
That after a result of much discussion with the neighbors, the landscape buffer that was
on the east property line was increased; that the landscape fingers that are on the last
row of parking was doubled; and that the applicant worked with staff to install the west
driveway;
That the applicant went through the process with the design review committee and the
City, in the fall of 2002; and that during that time period, the applicant developed those
standard requirements, preliminary grading plans, landscape plans, material boards,
detailed floor plans, elevations, building sections, soil reports, and the requested
acoustic and photometric studies, and traffic analysis;
.
That a Development Review Committee (DRC) meeting was held in February of 2003;
and that at that time, staff recommended a neighborhood meeting (one that would be
noticed) so that the applicant could receive public input early on in the process;
That the first public meeting announced by the City was held in March of 2003; that the
major impacts of concern that came out of that meeting was security, evening and
morning noise, lighting, future development of the property to the north of the proposed
property (which belongs to the church), screening, height of the steeple, inadequate
landscape buffer, home depreciation, traffic concerns, and the concern that the church
would use other uses outside the statement of operation;
That as a result of the March 2003 meeting, further adjustments were made to the
design such as parking lot light poles that were on the east property line were moved at
the end of the landscape finger so that it would be 40 feet away from the property line of
the adjacent homes; that the steeple was lowered by two-stories (20 feet); that a traffic
study was initiated; that the church committed to sell the excess property so that there
would be no concern that there would be some expansion of the proposed facility, but
that until the church has a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), would the church be able to
.
R:IMinutesPCI051904
12
.
.
.
commit to sell the remaining property; that a gate was added to, the east driveway; and
that a primary building entrance was proposed for the west entry;
That the revised ,documents were accomplished and resubmitted to the City in June;
That per the request of staff, a second community meeting was held with the neighbors
on September 11, 2003 to show the neighbors how their concerns were addressed; that
the applicant listened to similar concerns of neighboring homeowners; that traffic was
the most common expressed concern; that the applicant's traffic engineer was available
to answer questions; and that new concerns arouse such as depreciating homes and
the use of the property north of the proposed property;
That the applicant provided staff with a Phase 1 Cultural Resource Assessment Initial
Study (which concerns archeological issues);
That a palentological study was provided;
That in January 2004, all documents had been provided and staff was'satisfied; and that
the process was set to go through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), staff,
City Attorney, and the CUP hearing;
That the following are concerns that have been adjusted and what is currently in the
project to mitigate and address existing concerns: .
0 Site suitability;
0 Traffic;
0 Privacy;
0 Noise;
0 Parking lot lights; and
0 Property values.
At this time, Mr. Cornwall addressed a letter that was referred to as May 12, 2004, from the
homeowners of Temecula, Corte Villosa, noting the following:
1. Retaininq wall: that the applicant will be engineering and installing a retaining wall, and
if desired by the homeowners, that the applicant would also be willing to install a six-foot
wrought iron fence on top of the wall so that when the condition of the properties being
back filled ag'ainst it, it would not have an 8 foot or 6 foot drop-off, down ,from the
applicant's wall; and that the' Church has offered to install the retaining wall at its
expense. '
2. Back-fillinq back .yards: that the applicant would be willing to make back-fill material
available from its site development at the time of the development; that they would allow
access and encourage their graders to be used by the homeowners to install the back-
fill.
3. Landscape and irriqation for reclaimed land: that the applicant would be willing to offer
the homeowners landscaping and irrigation at a reduced rate.
4. Greenbelt: that the residences concurred that 20 feet between properties would be
adequate; that most of the trees requested by the adjacent homeowners are huge and
dense; and that the applicant would be willing to work with staff to come up with proper
and acceptable landscaping for the proposed property.
R:\MinulesPCI051904
13
5. Roofinq material: that the applicant is willing to change the color of the roof.
6. Liqhtinq: that the applicant is willing to work with staff in regards to parking lot lighting.
.
Mr. Cornwall relayed that the applicant has appreciated the communication between the
applicant, staff and neighbors.
For Commissioner Olhasso, Mr. Harris noted that the results of the analysis that was periormed
by the landscape architect would be in staff's report.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Cornwall relayed that the gate on the east boundary would be
closed at all times.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Cornwall stated that the Church would be willing to be
responsible for the wall, the fence and the landscaping; and that the drainage swale, existing
wrought iron fence and the slope is not the church's property and would be the responsibility of
the homeowners.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Cornwall relayed the following: noted that the proposed
retaining wall would ex1end to the 7'" property line; and that if the homeowners were interested
in the back fill, they could have it at no cost to them; and the applicant is willing to change the
color of the roof, but that they would not be changing the materials; and that the applicant is
open to any combination of light fixtures in the parking lot to address the concerns of lighting.
For Chairman Telesio, Mr. Cornwall noted that the traffic survey was periormed before the
neighboring schools let out; and that if there is a concern in regard to entering the proposed
area through the westerly gate during the evening times, the applicant would be willing to close
the westerly gate in the evening.
.
Mr. Rocky Snider, project manager for the LDS Church, relayed the following:
That staff delete Condition of Approval No. 13;
That on the evenings when activities conclude at 11 :00 p.m., that the lights around the
building remain on until the last person leaves 11 :15 or 11 :30; and that the eastern
parking lot lights shall be turned off at 10:00 p.m. seven days a week;
That because a dance is considered a primary activity, the applicant would request that
the Condition of Approval in regard to dances be modified to allow for more than one day
per month and would also request that it open to other nights of the week other than
Saturday night;
That in regard to Stake Conferences, the applicant would request that Condition of
Approval No. 20 be deleted that it is covered under Condition of Approval No. 19.
That as soon as the applicant receives its Conditional Use Permit (CUP), the real estate
department of the church would start the process of selling the property.
Mr. Kevin Osborne, 32750 Pine Circle, Stake President, relayed the following:
That a commitment has been made to sell the excess property; that as soon as the
applicant receives its Conditional Use Permit (CUP), the real estate department of the
church would start the process of selling the property;
That five (5) percent of the residents of Temecula are members of the LDS church;
.
R:\MinutesPCI051904
14
.
.
.
That there is usually a 50 to 60 percent attendance of services every Sunday;
That the proposed building is designed for the members of the church but that the
community is welcome to participate in the use of the building; and that there are many
different events that are community oriented;
That the applicant are proponents of the Boy Scouts of, America; and that there are
seven (7) different troops located within the, Temecula Stake and non-members are
welcome to the scouting program;
That the proposed facility would also be used for a Blood Drive, where the whole
community is welcome to participate; .
That the proposed facility would also be useable for the community.
The following individuals spoke in favor of the proposed project:
Mr. Benjamin Graff
Mr. Heber J. Hurd
Mr. Brad Start
Mr. Stewart Morris
Ms. Larry Slussor
Ms. Melanie Moore
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
. Temecula
The above mentioned individuals spoke in favor of the proposed project for the following reason:
That the Church would be advocating honesty, integrity, and will teach citizens how to be
responsible members of socieiy; . .
That the Church would strengthen families and increase the quality of life for families in
the neighborhoods;
That the proposed Church would help to build a better community;
That the dances at the Church would have 16 to 20 adult chaperone per day supervised
in the dance and the parking lots; that there would be 100 to 150 youth per dance ages
14 through 18; that most of the individuals do not drive; that the dances will take place
inside three sets of doors which will diminish the sound to the exterior; and that the youth
attending dances would not be able to exit the building without parental consent;
That LDS Churches are built in residential areas and that it does not engage in money
generating endeavors that may classify it as a business;
That the youth program teaches young people to become honest well adjusted adults;
That the Church of LDS will be a beautiful Church; and that they are always well
maintained inside and outside and would be an asset to any community;
The following individual spoke in opposition of the proposed project:
Ms. Jenny Elliott
Mr. Don McLaughlin
Mr. Jim Johnson
Ms. Beth Ceja
Ms. Bobbi Corn
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
R:\MinutesPCI051904
15
Mr. Stephen Longo
Ms. Rebecca Longo
Mr. Tony Hardy
Mr. Kenneth Ray
Mr. David Kimbass
Mr. John Wilshire
Ms. Marjorie Gregory
Mr. William Agnew
Ms. Kristen Boano
Mr. Chris Sorensen
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
Temecula
.
The above mentioned individuals spoke in opposition of theproposed project for the following
reasons:
That the proposed LDS Church does not blend in with the surrounding neighborhood;
That since the proposal of the LDS Church, five (5) residents have relocated;
That the residents would prefer to have single-family units rather than a 24, 287 square
foot church;
That their currently are 12 public institutions within a mile of the proposed area;
That the properties adjacent to the proposed building would be faced with hundreds of
people coming and going and looking into the yards;
That there will be excess noise created by the cars and people coming from the
proposed building;
The quality of life will be compromised by the proposed building;
That a 24, 287 square foot, 31 foot tall building will create a massing affect;
That the residents did not receive the operations matrix or the new draft of the
Conditions of Approval (CUP);
That the drainage issue is a concern for adjacent residents;
That the proposed facility will block the view of many of the surrounding residents;
That the residents are concerned that the traffic analysis has not been adequately
addressed;
That residents were of the opinion that the proposed property was zoned for custom
ranch style homes;
.
Director of Planning Ubnoske clarified that per the Development Code, there are a number of
uses that are conditionally permitted in very low density zones such as mobile home parks,
daycare centers, museums etc.
That the proposed facility deviates from the intent and the character of rural ranch
development;
That no other areas of Temecula have the density of schools and churches concentrated
as much as the proposed area has;
That air pollution is a concern;
That if the proposed facility is approved that it be dramatically scaled down;
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Cornwall relayed that the applicant would be willing to work
with staff in adding more landscaping in front of the church; and that the applicant will be
responsible for maintaining the retaining wall.
R:IMinulesPCIO51904
.
16
.
.
.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
At this time, Commissioner Chiiliaeff moved to extend the meeting to 11 :30 p.m. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed concern of staff's ability to meet the second criteria of the
Conditional Use Permit (compatibility with the surrounding area); and stated that he would be of
the opinion that the proposed facility and/or any other type of public facility would not be
compatible with the surrounding single-family residences.
Commissioner Mathewson stated for the audience that he has been taking notes and takes
every comment seriously.
Commissioner Mathewson expressed some concern with the traffic that the proposed facility
would be bringing but that overall was pleased with the proposed architecture; and noted his
appreciation for the applicant's willingness to address many of the concerns of the community.
Commissioner Guerriero echoed Commissioner Mathewson's comments advising that he would
be in favor of the proposed project.
Commissioner Olhasso commended the speaker's willingness to meet and invest their time;
stating that she also appreciates the work that the applicant and staff have put into the proposed
project.
Chairman Telesio echoed the above mentioned comments.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Deputy Director Parks relayed that currently the capacity of the
,road is 8200 and that at built out it would be 31 ,000 trips a day.
Commissioner Chiniaeff stated that he also appreciates the applicant's willingness to
accqmmodate the surrounding community; but that he has concerns with the overall massing
affect that the proposed project would bring to the surrounding area.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation, modifying the
Conditions of Approval with respect to the operating hours by deletion of Condition of Approval
No. 13, modifying Condition of Approval No. 18 to reflect that the proposed facility may operate
12 primary activities per year until 11 :00 p.m., deletion of Condition of Approval No. 20, and'that
the modification of the roof color be worked out between staff and the applicant. Commissioner
Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Chiniaeff who voted No.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
No reports at this time,
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
No report at this time,
R:IMinutesPCI051904
17
ADJOURNMENT
At 11 :30 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetina
to be held on Wednesday. June 2. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
John Telesio
Chairman
R:\MinutesPCI051904
18
.
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 2, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:02 P.M., on
Wednesday, June 2, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business'Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Olhasso led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Chairman Telesio.
Absent:
Guerriero.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
, CONSENT CALENDAR
Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of June 2, 2004.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
COMMISSION BUSINESS
2 Review of the 2005-2009 Capital Improvement Proqram
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Review the proposed Capital Improvement Program for 2005-2009 and provide
comments to the City Council on the consistency withihe adopted General Plan
R:IMinulesPC1060204
Principal Planner Hogan presented a brief staff report (of record), noting the following:
That the item before the Commission would be for the annual review of the proposed
Capital Improvement Project (CIP);
.
That the CIP is the City's long term capital project that would allow the City to budget
funds for large products over a period of time;
That the decision before the Planning Commission would be to determine whether or
not the proposed program is consistent with the General Plan.
For Principal Planner Hogan, Commissioner Chiniaeff requested that a more detailed analysis
be included in the next CIP report
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hogan relayed that in the future he would be happy to provide
a more detailed analysis.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested the following priorities be moved:
Priority II Diaz Road Extension to Cherry Street to Priority I.; Priority II Diaz Road widening from
Winchester and Rancho California Road to Priority I; and Priority 11\ Rancho California Road
East of Meadows Parkway to Priority I.
For the Commission, Mr. Hogan noted that Commission would not see the funding on the CIP
report because funding is not a General Plan issue.
.
Principal Planner Hogan relayed that he has been taking notes of the Commission's concerns
and will forward the comments to the City Council.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Hogan relayed that it would be his opinion that all the items
in the CIP are consistent with the General Plan.
3 Vacation of Interior Streets within the Tract 26941 (Crowne Hill Larqe Lot), Determination of
Conformity with the General Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Determine that the Vacation of Wolfe Street and Musilek Place to private streets is in
conformity with the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula.
Principal Planner Hogan presented a brief staff report (of record), noting the following:
That the Planning Commission consider the proposed vacation of a residential street
and make a determination the vacation is consistent with the adopted General Plan.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Deputy Director Parks relayed that the community will be a card
key gated community.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner
Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
.
R:\MinutesPCIO60204
2
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004-027
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA DETERMINING THAT THE V ACAllON OF
WOLFE STREET AND MUSILEK PLACE ARE IN CONFORMITY
WITH THE ADOPTED GENERAL PLAN
New Items
4 Plannina Application No. PA03"0582, submitted by Dean Davidson representinq LandAm
Construction Company, a Development Plan to construct a 26.104 square foot
, office/warehouse buildina on 3.64 acres located at the northeast corner of Roick Drive and
Via Industria
Associatè Planner Fisk presented a staff report (of record), highlighting the following:
That the proposed plan is consistent with the General Plan designation of Business Park
and zoning designation of light industrial;
. That the building meets the minimum setback requirements of the Development Code
and the proposed lot coverage of 16 Yo percent, which is below the maximum allowed
percentage of 40 percent;
That access to the site will be provided from two drive aisles off Roick Drive that will loop
around the proposed building and staff has determined that 37 parking spaces are
required to serve the proposed building while 54 spaces will be provided;
That the Fire Department has reviewed the plan determined that there is proper access
circulation for emèrgency services to the site;, .
That the proposed building design is consistent with Development Code and Design
Guidelines, and is compatible with industrial and office buildings in the surrounding area;
That the one-story building will provide multiple building planes, vari~d parapet heights,
and generous window area at the elevations facing Roick Drive and Via Industria; and a
patio with an arched metal frame on cast concrete columns provide a focal point at the
front of the building; .
That the main body of the concrete building' will be painted Dunn-Edwards "Grey Harbor"
with Dunn-Edwards "Cloak of White" trim and Dunn-Edwards "Gallow Glass" accents
and painted roll-up doors at the rear of the building;
That the roll-up doors at the rear of the building will face a significant slope so that the
rear of the building will not be visible from public-right-of-way;
That the proposed Sunbrella window awnings will be Burgundy in color and window
glass will be a "Solar Grey"; ,
That the scale and colors of the building are in proportion and compatible with the
surrounding area;
R:\MinulesPCI060204
3
That the landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development
Code and Design Guidelines;
.
That the tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively serve on site parking area and
effectively soften building elevations;
That the project is proposing to landscape 14,902 square feet or approximately 34
percent of the site which exceeds the minimum requirement of 20 percent in the light
industrial zone;
That the project will provide landscaping around the perimeter of the site with a 20 foot
landscape setback along Roick Drive and Via Industria and varied landscape setbacks
of 3 to 9 feet at various locations around the building foot print;
That a total of 174 trees and 1,358 shrubs are being proposed;
That in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project
has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review; and that
the exemption is class 32 for in-fill development;
That staff has determined the proposed office/warehouse building is consistent with the
City's General Plan Design Guidelines and Development Code and therefore, staff is
recommending approval of the Development Plan with the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
.
Mr. Dean Davidson, architect for the proposed project relayed the following:
That there will be a 4 foot off-set which alternatives in and out;
That the canopy will come out about another 10 feet in the front of the main arched
entry; and that they will be half-round awnings;
That the recesses are typically one-inch and are 12 inches wide;
That the cornice will be 8 inches deep with a radius over the top;
That the applicant agrees with the Conditions of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Mathewson expressed disappointment with the architecture.
Commissioner Chiniaeff echoed Commissioner Mathewson's comment.
Commissioner Olhasso also expressed disappointment with the proposed project stating she
would have preferred to see stone veneer along the base of the building.
.
R:\MinulesPC1060204
4
.
.
.
MOTION: Commissioner Mathewson moved to approve staff's recommendation and that staff
work with the applicant to enhance the base of the building. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded
the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero
who was absent.
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004-028
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA03-0582, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
26,104 SQUARE FOOT OFFICEJWAREHOUSE BUILDING ON
3,64 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
ROICK DRIVE AND VIA INDUSTRIA (APN 909-320060),
5 Planninq Application No. PA04-0152, submitted by Mark Richter, MDMG Inc.. a Conditional
Use Permit and Development Plan to construct a 13,777 square foot school facility on 4.37
acres located at 29275 Santiaqo Road
Associate Planner Long presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
That the proposed project is located on the Southside of Santiago Road, east of the 15
freeway;
. That the proposal, a private school building, is consistent with the land use designation,
and policies reflected in the Rancho Highlands Specific Plan (SP) and land use
standards in the City of Temecula General Plan and the City's Development Code;
That staff identified three (3) major issues with the project which include parking, noise,
and architecture;
That the proposed project requires a total of 55 parking spaces and that applicant is
, proposing 46 on site parking spaces;
That staff would request to add a Condition of Approval stating: that the applicant shall
obtain a shared parking agreement or provide onsite parking spaces to meet the parking
standards;
That in addition, staff would request to add a Condition of Approval stating that: that
upon occupancy of the proposed building, the existing classrooms will be transformed
into storage space only and shall not be used as classroom space; ,
. . That the applicant has submitted a preliminary noise study providing recommendations
to bring the interior noise levels of the proposed building to a less than significant level;
That the outdoor play areas are currently in accordance with the noise element of the
General Plan; .
That staff would request to eliminate the roof projection on the north elevation; that it is
staff's opinion that the roof projection does not conform with the proposed architecture;
R:\MinutesPCIO60204
5
That the project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines; and that staff is recommending approval with the revised conditions.
.
For Mr. Long, Commissioner Chiniaeff noted that staff might want to consider using asphalt
shingles versus flat concrete tile shingles.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Long noted that he will be adding a Condition of Approval
stating: that the applicant shall provide on-site parking to meet the parking demand or provide a
shared parking agreement that will be submitted in accordance with section 17.24.020E which
requires daytime and night uses; and noted that the school is in agreement wit the adjacent
Rancho Baptist Church for additional parking.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Larry Markham, representing the applicant noted the following:
That the applicant is in concurrence with the Conditions of Approval as modified with the
modification to the architecture in front;
That there is a lockable gate that will connect the two parking lots;
That the drop-off and pick-up for students is a separate entrance off of Santiago Road;
That the sideway entry coming from the public sidewalk of Santiago Road will go into the
larger gabled entrance which is the true entrance;
.
That the fencing will be made of a pilaster tubular steel fence.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
COMMISSION DISCUSSION
Commissioner Chiniaeff expressed excitement with the proposed project.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
The architect for the project relayed that the thick-butt composition shingle that is be proposed
would be consistent with the craftsman style roof and that a flat tile would impact the project
budget considerably.
Commissioner Olhasso noted that because there are enough elements in the architecture
features that she would concur with the thick butt composition shingles.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Olhasso moved to approve staff's recommendation with the added
conditions presented by staff. Commissioner Chiniaeff seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner Guerriero who was absent.
.
R:\MinutesPC\O60204
6
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-029
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO, PA04-0152, A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
FOR A 13,777 SQUARE FOOT SCHOOL FACILITY, LOCATED
AT 29275 SANTIAGO ROAD
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-030
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING DIRECTOR OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO,
PA04-0152, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPLICATION FOR A
13,777 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY INSTITUTION, LOCATED AT
29275 SANTIAGO ROAD .
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
Commissioner Chiniaeff requested that Code Enforcement talk to Stuart Anderson's regarding
the water fountain.
Commissioner Mathewson queried regarding the color of the Shell gas station at Rancho
California Road and Margarita Road and also expressed concern with the advertisement
'balloon at the Exxon Mobile on Rancho California Road at the Target Center.
Commissioner Olhasso relayed that the Happy Mover van is still parked on De Portola Road
and would request that Code Enforcement explore the matter.
Chairman Telesio relayed that there are banner signs on the lawn area at the Bell Villaggio
Center.
Chairman Telesio relayed that he attended the VFWs memorial at the cemetery.
Principal Planner Hazen relayed that he would be informing Code Enforcement of the
Commission's concerns.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Principal Planner Hazen relayed that theLDS project and the Davidson home project in
Roripaugh have both been appealed and will be going to Council.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:00 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to the next reqular meetinq to
be held on Wednesdav. June 16. 2004 at 6:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula.
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
John Telesio
Chairman
R:\MinulesPCI060204
7
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
DATE:
July 21,2004
SUBJECT:
Director's Hearing Case Update
Planning Director's Agenda items for June 2004
PA03-0485
June 24, 2004
PA04-0031
Attachment:
A Development Plan to construct a 6,500
square foot, single-story office/restaurant
building on a 1.03 acre site within the Vail
Ranch Town Square, located at the
southwest corner of State Highway 79 and
.MahlonVail Road
A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 5.19
acre parcel (4.19 net acres) into three (3)
commercial parcels with a minimum lot size
of 1.17 acres, located at the southeast
corner of Overland Drive and Ynez Road
A Minor Conditional Use Permit to co-
locate twelve (12) cellular antennas and
four (4) equipment cabinets on an existing
mono-pine, located at 29775 Santiago
Road
1.
Action Agendas - Blue Page 2
.
Po \PLAN NIN OlD IRHEAR IMEM 0\2004106-2004 .doc
Jim Patton
Davcon
Development
Linda Arce
Sprint
Approved
Approved
.
.
.
Po \PLAN N IN Gill IRI I EA RIMEM 0\2004106- 2oo4,doc
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
ACTION AGENDAS
.
.
.
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING'
June 10, 2004 1 :30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listedon the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white" Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the Principal Planner.
When you are caned to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Continued from May 27, 2004
Item No, 1
Project Information:
Project Number:
Project Type
Project Title
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
APN:
Project Planner:
ACTION: .
Item No.2
,Project Information
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
APN:
PA03-0709
Development Plan
Vail Ranch Town Square, Bldg B, Parcel 2
Square One Development
A Development Plan to construct a 6,500 sqft single-story
office/ restaurant building on a 1.03 acre site within the Vail
Ranch Town Square.
Located at the southwest corner of State Hwy 79 & Mahlon
Vail Road.' '
960-020-045
Dan Long
APPROVED
PA03-0485
Tentative Parcel Map
TPM #31724
Davcon Development, 42389 Winchester Rd. - #B,
Temecula, CA
A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 5.19 acre parcel (4.19
net acres) into three (3) commercial parcels with a minimum
lot size of 1.17 acres. '
Southeast corner of Overland and Ynez Road
921-810-020
P,IPLANNINGIDlRHEARlAgendasl2004I06-IO-04 Aetioo Agenda.doc
I
Case Planner:
Case Planner's e-mail address:
ACTION:
Cheryl Kitzerow
cheryl.kitzerow@cityoftemecula.org
APPROVED
.
.
.
P,IPLANNINGIDIRHEARlAgendasl2004I06-IO-04 Action Agenda.doc
2
.
.
.
ACTION AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING DIRECTOR'S HEARING
REGULAR MEETING
June 24, 20041:30 PM
TEMECULA CITY HALL MAIN CONFERENCE ROOM
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
CALL TO ORDER: Don Hazen, Principal Planner
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public 'can address the Principal Planner
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes each.
If you desire to speak to the Principal Planner about an item not listed on the Agenda, a
white "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and tiled with the Principal Planner.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address.
Item No, 1
Project Information:
Project Number:
Project Type:
Project Title:
Applicant:
Project Description:
Location:
APN:
Project Planner:
ACTION:
PAO4-0031
Minor Conditional Use Permit
Rancho Baptist Co-Location
Sprint'
A Minor CUP to co-locate 12 cellular antennas
equipment cabinets on an existing mono-pine.
29775 Santiago Road
922-013-017
Stuart Fisk
APPROVED
and 4
PoIPLANNINGIDIRHEARlAg",das\2004\06-24-04 A,oon Agenda,doc
1
.
ITEM #4
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
. PLANNING DIVISION -
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
, '
FROM:
Dan Long, Associate Planner
DATE:
August4,2004
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity for a business to
conduct mail order alcohol sales, located at 42210 Zevo Drive.
GENERAL PLAN:
Subject:
BP Business Park
North:
South:
East:
West:
ZONING:
Subject:
North:
South:
East:
West:
LAND USE:
Subject:
North:
South:
. East:
West:
BACKGROUND
BP Business Park
BP Business Park
BP Business Park
BP Business Park
LI Light Industrial
LI Light Industrial
LI Light Industrial
LI Light Industrial
LI Light Industrial
Manufacturing and Offices
Industrial Condominiums (Under construction)
Vacant
Southern California Moving and Storage
Industrial Building (Batting Cages)
"Stringer's" is requesting the Temecula City Planning Commission make a finding of public
convenience or necessity in order to authorize a gift packaging business, including wine located at
42210 Zevo Drive. State law requires a' local finding of public convenience or necessity before an
alcoholic beverage sales license will be issued by the Alcoholic Beverage Control.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project for wine sales (included as part of gift baskets) via internet and mail order
requires proper licensing from the Department of Alcohol and Beverage Control (ABC). A type 9, 17
and 20 license is required for the proposed project. Staff has discussed the proposed project with
ABC staff and has determined that the census tract is over concentrated. A maximum of two type 20
licenses are permitted in Census Tract 0437.15; there are currently ten existing. According to the
RIPC&NIPAQ4-Q440 Siring,,', LLOI'C S",¡¡ Report.doc
ABC staff, PC&N findings are not required for type 9 and 17 licenses which allow for non-retail
alcohol sales. Type 9 and 17 licenses are required for beer and wine importers and wholesale
distributor licenses respectively. The type 20 license allows for wine sales only via internet and mail
order. On-site retail sales are not allowed with this type 20 license. The Development Code also
restricts retail sales in the light industrial (LI) zone. Condition of Approval No.7 reiterates on-site
retail sales from the project site are prohibited.
.
The Planning Commission has developed several criteria to determine whether or not a finding of
public convenience or necessity can be made. The criteria and the responses are as follows:
Criteria to Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
1.
Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found in other
similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, and other special
services)?
Yes. Staff is unaware of any other business or manufacturer that setis, distributes or
prepares gift baskets of this sort within the business community.
2.
Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e., patrons of a
different socio-economic class)?
No. Stringer's will not cater to an under-served population. The proposed project will provide
a product that will be sold in venues such as grocery stores and the intemet and will be
available to ati socio-economic classes.
3.
.
Are there geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways,
major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other
establishments?
Yes. The proposed project is located on Zevo Drive in the Business Park. Staff is unaware of
any similar type business in the City or the Business Park.
4.
Are there any sensitive uses within 500 feet of the proposed establishment?
Yes. The closest land use which could be considered a sensitive is Sunridge Community
Church, however since the project is not authorized for retail on-site sales; this will not create
a nuisance.
5.
Would the proposed establishment interiere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by
residents of the area?
No. Stetiar Cetiar is located in an industrial area and will not include retail sales on-site. The
project will include a display area for purchasers to preview, however retaii sales are not
permitted in the LI Zone.
6,
Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
No. According to the Police Department, Stetiar Cetiar is not expected to create or
exacerbate a law enforcement problem in the area.
.
R:IPC&N\PA04-Q440 String""s LLCIPC Sla¡¡ Report-doc
.
.
.
7.
Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed
establishment?
There are currently 10 facilities within census tract 0437.15, only 2 are aI/owed.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the information presented above and
make the appropriate finding.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Zoning/General Plan Map - Blue Page 4
2.
Draft Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
3.
ABC License Types and Summary and Census Tract Map - Blue Page 6
R:\PC&NlPA04-0440 St,.;ngers LLCIPC Staff Report,doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
ZONING/GENERAL PLAN MAP
RWC&NII',\()4-()440 S...inge>', UDPC Staff Report,doc
.
Zoning
General Plan
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R,\I'C&NIPAO4-0440 S',ingcr's LLapc St"rr Rcpon.doc
.
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. 6.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No, PA04-0440
Project Description: '
Findings of Public Convenience and Necèssity to allow
for a gift packaging business to sell wine in gift
baskets for internet and off-site distribution in an
existing industrial building, located at 42210 Zevo
Drive (APN: 909-360-034)
¡
909-360-034
Assessor's Parcel No.: '
Approval Date:
August 4, 2004
Expiration Date:
August 4, 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Dëp~rtme'nt a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption,as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
. above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). .
General Requirements
The applicant shall comply with the statement of operations (attached) dated June 24,
2004, for PA04-0440 on file with the Planning Division, unless superceded by these
Conditions of Approval. '
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this project. '
, The applicant. shall sign .both copies of the final ~onditions of àpproval that will be
provided 'by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied' with prior to any, use allowed by this
permit. . .
Prior to the commencement of any alcohol sales, the applicant shall submit verification
the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has issued the necessary license..
R:IPC&N\PAO4_W40 String""s LLCIDraft CorA.doc
7.
No on-site retail sales are permitted at the project site. All sales shall be via internet,
distribution and/or mail order.
.
8.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
9.
11.
Applicant has applied for the following types of alcohol license through the Department
of Alcoholic Beverage Control:
a. Type 09 (Beer and Wine Importer)
b. Type 17 (Beer and Wine Wholesaler)
c. Type 20 (internet sales, restricted to wine only)
The sales of all alcoholic beverages (beer & wine) shall be packaged for off- premises
sales only. Packaged and carry-out service is not authorized (on-site retail sales).
Applicant will also comply with City Ordinance 97-07, (9.14.010 Temecula Municipal
Code series).
When selling baskets containing alcohol, Identification will be verified utilizing one of the
following:
a. A valid California Driver's License.
b. A valid California Identification Card.
c. A valid Military Identification Card. (Active/Reserve/Retired/Dependent).
d. A valid Driver's License from any of the Fifty States or Territories of the United
States.
A valid U.S. Passport.
A valid government Issued identification card issued by a federal, state, county or
city agency.
.
e.
f.
10.
As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a federal,
state, county or city agency is acceptable, providing it complies with the below
requirements. (25660 B&P).
a. Name of person.
b. Date of birth.
c. Physical description.
d. Photograph.
e. Currently valid (not expired).
Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification
checks for the purpose of any sales of baskets containing alcoholic beverages is trained
in the proper procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department
provides free training for all employers and employees involved in the service and sales
of alcoholic beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training
session for all new employees working at Stringers. Contact the Crime Prevention and
Plans Officer at (909) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training must be completed
prior to the grand opening of this business. If employees have completed the required
training administered through ABC Riverside, this training session is not required.
.
RoV'C&NIPAO4-Q440 Stcingds LLClo"n CofA,doc
.
.
.
12.
Miscellaneous:
a.
Wholesale Beer and Wine - Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for
consumption off the premises where sold. No distilled spirits may be on the
premises. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5 of
the B&P (Business & Profession Code).
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Printed Name
Date
Applicant's Signature
R,\!'C&NIPAO4.Q440 String"'s LLCIDrnft CorA.doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 3
ABC LICENSE TYPES AND SUMMARY AND CENSUS TRACT MAP
R:II'C&NII'A04-0440 SIT;ngds LLCII'C Staff Reportdoc
Department of Alcoholic B~verage Control
COMMON ABC LlC~NSE TYPES
AND THEIR BASIC PRIVILEGES
State of Cat;fom;a
BEER MANUFACTURER - (Large Brewery) Autliorizes the sale of beer to, any person holding a license
authorizing the sale of beer, and to consumers for'èonsumption on or off the maniifacturer's licensed
premises. Without any additional licenses, may sell bèer ,and wine, regardless ôf source, to consumers for
consuri1ption at acbona fide public eating pla5Oe on the manufacturer's licensed'piemisés or at a bona fide
eating place contiguous to the manufacturer's licensed prefiÚses,' May conduct beer tastings under
s ecifiedconditiôni Section233573 . Minorsare:1llowedonthe, remises... "Cc,,', ,'..
" WINEGROWER"C (Winery)' 'Aut¡¡òriiës,thë~ålêòf wii1ë and biaíidito'any'p'êjsoi1,höldiÌ1gã'liêêriie ':c,:,
authorizing the iale'ofwine and brandy, and to consumers for consumption off the prefiÚses where sold.
Authorizes the sale of all wines and brandies, regardless of source, to consumers for consumption on the
premises in a bona fide eating place that is locatéd on the liCensed premises or on premises owned by the
licensee that are èoniiguous,tothe licensed'prerriises and oper~ted by and for the licensee. May possess
wine and braridyfor use in the preparation of food and beverage io'be conSumed at the bona fide eatin'g
place. May éoIlduciviinètasiings under,prescribed'conditions'(Section23356:1; RÍ1le53):.'MiIlors are'
"allowedôn..tÌ1e,"iêiriises, ", .', '.,' ',,', :':,".',:'>:<..~':i...,:/:::,,"','.)""'"
OFF SALE BEER &WINE - (Package Store) Authorizes tne sale ofbeei arid wine for èonslln1ptiôn off
the remises where sold. Minors are allowed on the remises. "
OFF SALE GENERAL " (Pâckage;Store)i.Aúthòiizès the s'ãle,ofbeer"winé ilnddistilléd'spirits for "
consum'tióhoffth¿remise"whereióld.'MiÌ1&ts.'iie"állo'\\ièd'o[;th~'r¡;ri:ûs6s. i' ,"'.. " ',',
SMALL BEER MANUFACTURER -'(Brevi Pub 'or MiCro-brewery) AuthoriZes the same privileges and
restrictions as å TyPe 01. Abrewpubis typically a ,very sinaIÏb~ewerý wiÍliarest'!{¡ránt. Amicro-brewery
is asmall-scale'¡)i<,wery operation that typically is dedicatèd soldy to' ..the prôdiictio'n;óf specialty beers,
althou 'h..sofue do havé a restaúrimto'r úb"~n'tlÍ<;ií'inånufàctiÌii¡¡" låTIt. .,,"'" c .'
ON SALE:BEER: - (Bar, Tavêmj'.AûtnoÌižes'the' sale of,bêer'fúi'coìisúriiptiOn'on:orOffthe premises
where s~"!' "NoY;i¡'eoidistillciIspirits~iriiY!~e~ori¡hepiemisés.Fûlltrii~ls:áré riot ieqiiiied;bowever,
,saridwiches,or..slÌacks must'be'available":"MiiÍórs are'ãlloweifontlie, 'iemises"", ,
ONSALE,BEER8i'W1NE Co EATINGPUACE,'(RêslaUiårit). Aiitnúrizesthe'sale of..beer and wine for
,con~uiri¡,tionon:úroffthe p'reITüseS whêie~òl{[. ,DistiÜ~d's¡iiritS may riotbeõò the prenlises (except
braiidy,rum, oi'¡iqueufsfór use sólelj/i'br cbôÌâ[{gpúi¡jóies).:.Mtistoþ'J,aie"ând'rii'aiti¡;¡iÍthelidòsed
premises as,a'l5Óri~fidê eatiIlg'pláèÚ,Ìv!úst riii."J'ácfuål iÎòd subsfuÌ1tiâis'iiiôs:or-riiêáls;dunng fue nofnial
,myal hòurs iliàttlieyare ópên;at,ieastfi~e,'da~s'awée~.NóiiriålfuÚltimê¥'irê6"ÒÓ'a:m: -, .
9:00 a.m., '11:00 a.m. "2:00piin.."and'6:00 p:m:.- 9:00'p:m.'Premise,dh'at ",enót open' five 'days ã week
. must serve meals,on,the Já sthe ,áfêó èii,'Minor;';"eaiIoWe'dori the" iJinises.':. .
ON SALE BEER& WINE ~PUBLIC PREMISES '(Bar; Táverìi) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine
,for 'consUmption ori or off the prehÜses whei"sold.No'distilled spintsmay'be on the'prefiÚses. Minors are
not allowed to enter and remain (see ,Section 256'63,5 for exception, musiciaris). 'Food service is not
re uired., '.. '
ON'SALEGENERÀL '-EATING'PLACE è :(Rêitàurant)'..Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled
spirits for cónsumpiion on'the licensed premises. Àuthorizes die sale of beer arid wine for consu~ption off
the,licensed premises, Must operate and maintain the licensedpreiÌ1ises asa bona fide eating place. Must
makeactual'andsubstantial sales of meals, during the nonnal meal hours that they are open; at least ,five
days a week. Nonnal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m., II :00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m,
Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the 'days they are open. Minors are
allowed on the remises. '
ON SALE GENERAL- PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Night Club) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and
distilled spirits for consumption on the prefiÚses where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for.
consumption'offthepremiseswhere sold. Minors are not allowed to enter and remainesee Section 25663.5
forëice t;on;iTIusicianS.'Foodsetvicêis'iibÜeuirèd:" .. ',' '. " <",. " , . ,','
ON SALE GENERAL - SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges and restrictions as provided for a
Type 47 license except it is issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the
license certificate.
.'
.
,ABC-616 (4104)
ABC-616 (4104)
CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold, No off-sale privileges, Food service is not required. Minors are
allowed on the remises.
VETERAN'S CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only,
for consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guest
only, for consumption off the licensed premises. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the
remises.
SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL - Generally issued to certain organizations who cannot qualify for club
licenses. Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guests
only, for consumption off the licensed premises. Food service is not required, Minors are allowed on the
remises.
ON SALE BEER AND WINE - SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges as a Type 41. Issued for a
s ecific season. Inclusive dates of 0 eration are listed on the license certificate.
ON SALE BEER - SEASONAL - Authorizes the sale of beer only for consumption on or off the
premises where sold. Issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the license
certificate. Wine or distilled s irits ma not be on the remises. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE BEER - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer only for
consumption on or off the licensed premises. Wine or distilled spirits may not be on the premises. Minors
are not allowed to enter and remain warnin si ns re uired. Food service is not re wred.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN - Authorizes the sale of wine purchased from a licensed winegrower or
wine wholesaler only to registered guests of the establishment for consumption on the premises. No beer
or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Wine shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
wine shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation. Removal of wine
from the ouods is not ennitled. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE GENERAL - RESTRICTIVE SERVICE - Authorizes the sale or furnishing of beer, wine
and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises to the establishment's overnight transient occupancy
guests or their invitees. This license is nonnally issued to "suite-type" hotels and motels, which exercise
the license rivile es for ests' "com limenta "ha hour. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE GENERAL - BREWPUB - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
for consumption on a bona fide eating place plus a limited amount of brewing of beer. Also authorizes the
sale of beer and wine only for consumption off the premises where sold, Minors are allowed on the
remises.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN -GENERAL- Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
purchased from a licensed wholesaler or winegrower only to registered guests of the establishment for
consumption on the premises. Alcoholic beverages shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
alcoholic beverage shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation.
Removal of alcoholic bevera es from the ounds is not enuitted. Minors are allowed on the remises.
.
.
.<HDVe
5"f~,~,..,.,,<J;.9,.
~L ,1 D~
";, "--'i' ¡
<co"o,,;;o
.
2000 Census Tract Boundaries
3000 6000 Feet
~
N
A
c\g;","",", dala',""""2ooo,a,,
.
ITEM #5
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Planning Commission
FROM:
Dan Long, Associate Planner
DATE:
August 4, 2004
SUBJECT:
Consideration of Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity to conduct wine tasting
and wine sales, located at 28636 Old Town Front Street, Suite 102
GENERAL PLAN:
CC Community Commercial
Subject:
Nórth:
South:
East:
West:
ZONING:
Subject:
North:
South:
East:
West:
LAND USE:
Subject:
North:
South:
.East:
West:
BACKGROUND
CC Community Commercial
CC Community Commercial
CC Community Commercial
CC Community Commercial
TRC Tourist Retail Core (Old.Town Specific Plan)
TRC Tourist Retail Core (Old Town Specific Plan)
TRC Tourist Retail Core (Old Town Specific Plan)
TRC Tourist Retail Core (Old Town Specific Plan)
TRC 'T'ourist Retail Core (Old Town Specific Plan)
Vacant tenant space
Vacant
Rosa's Cantina and Restaurant
Retail Commercial
Vacant'
"Stellar Cellars" is requesting the Temecula City Planning Commission make a finding of public
convenience or necessity in order to authorize a wine tasting facility and retail sales of wines to be
located in the Rancon commercial center at 28636 Front Street, Suite 102. When a census tract is
over concentrated, state law requires a local finding of public convenience or necessity before an
alcoholic beverage sales license will be issued by the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board.
The land use matrix (Table 1) in the Old Town Specific Plan allows wine tasting facilities as a
permitted use. A use permit is not required for said facility. -
ANALYSIS
The proposed project, requires a type 42 license from the Department of Alcohol and Beverage
Control (ABC). Staff has discussed the proposed project with the ABC staff and has determined that
RWC&N\I'A04-0442 Stell", Cell", LLOPC Starr Report.doc
the census tract is over concentrated. A maximum of 3 type 42 licenses are permitted in census
tract 0432.15; there are currently 47 existing (most of which are on-site, restaurant uses). A type 42
license allows for on-site beer and wine consumption as well as retail sales for off-site consumption.
.
The Planning Commission has developed several criteria to determine whether or not a finding of
public convenience or necessity can be made. The criteria and the responses are as follows:
Criteria to Justify Making a Finding of Public Convenience or Necessity
1.
Does the proposed establishment have any unique features which are not found in other
similar uses in the community (i.e. types of games, types of food, and other special
services)?
Yes. According to Stellar Cellar, their establishment will be the first dedicated wine tasting
room of its type in the Old Town area. The wine tasting facility will highlight local wines and
local culture as well as providing wines from other parts of the world.
2.
Does the proposed establishment cater to an under-served population (i.e., patrons of a
different socio-economic class)?
No. Stellar Cellar will not cater to an under-served population. The proposed project will
provide additional opportunities for wine consumers to taste and purchase local wines and
wines from around the world
3.
Are there geographical boundaries (i.e. rivers, hillsides) or traffic barriers (i.e. freeways,
major roads, major intersections) separating the proposed establishment from other
establishments?
.
No. There is currently a Beer and Wine garden in the Old Town District, however, the
proposed project will offer wine tasting and retail sales of wines for off-site consumption.
4.
Are there any sensitive uses within 500 feet of the proposed establishment?
No. The closest land use which could be considered sensitive is a private school (Kids
World) located on f1 street, approximately 600 feet from the proposed project. There is also
a church (God's Country) located at the north west corner of Santiago Road and Front
Street, however it is a shared use with the Stampede, which is a country western bar and
entertainment facility.
5.
Would the proposed establishment interfere with the quiet enjoyment of their property by
residents of the area?
No. Stellar Cellar is located in a commercial area and will not be open past 10:00 PM on
weekends and Fridays and 8:00 PM on weekdays.
6.
Will the proposed establishment add to law enforcement problems in the area?
No. According to the Police Department, Stellar Cellar is not expected to create or
exacerbate a law enforcement problem in the area.
.
R,\PC&N\"A04-Q442 Stellar Cellar LLaPC Staff Report,doc
.
.
.
7.
Is there a proliferation of licensed establishments within a quarter mile of the proposed
establishment?
Yes. There area total of47 type 42 licenses within census tract 0432. 15, only 3 are allowed.
According to the ABC, the majority of type 42 licenses within in census tract 0432. 15 are
restaurants with incidental beer and wine.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission consider the information presented above and
make the appropriate finding. .
Attachments
1.
Zoning/General Plan Map - Blue Page 4
2.
Draft Conditions of Approval - Blue Page 5
3.
ABC License Types and Summary and Census Tract Maps - Blue Page 6
R,IPC&N\PA04-0442 Stell" Cell" LLaI'C Staff Report,doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
ZONING/GENERAL PLAN MAP
R,\I'C&N\PAO4-Q442 Stell", CeJl", LLOPC Starr Rcpoct.doc
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RWC&NlPA04.0442 Stell", Cd", LLC\I'C Siaff Rcpocl.doc
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No, PA04-0442
Project Description:
Findings of Public Convenience and Necessity to allow
for a wine tasting a retail sales of wine in an existing
co'mmercial building in Old Town, located at 28636
'Front Street (APN: 922-034-036)
Assessor's ParcefNo.:
922-034-036
Approval Date:
August 4, 2004
August 4, 2006
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a' cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty~Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required
above, the approval for the projeci granted shall be void by'reason of failure of condition
(Fish and G.~me Code Section 711.4(c)). ,
General Requirements
2.
, ,
The applicant shall comply 'with the statement of operations (attached) dated May 28,
2004, for PA04-0442 on file with the Planning Division, unless superceded by these
Conditions of Approval.
3.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of thi,s project.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
4.
5.
All of the foregoing ~onditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit..
6.
Prior to the commencement of any alcohol sales, the applicant shall submit verification
the Department of Alcohol Beverage Control has issued the necessary Type 42 license"
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Applicant has applied for a Type 42 alcohol license through the Riverside office of
Alcohol Beverage'Control. The sales and use of all alcoholic beverages (on sale beer &
R:IPC&NIPA04-0442 Slella, Cella, LLCIDmft CorA.doc
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
wine) shall be consumed on premises only. Packaged and carry-out service is
authorized. Applicant will also comply with City Ordinance 97-07, (9.14.010 Temecula
Municipal Code series):
.
Identification will be verified utilizing one of the following:
a. A valid California Driver's License.
b. A valid California Identification Card.
c.
A valid Military Identification Card. (Active/Reserve/RetiredlDependent).
A valid Driver's License from any of the Fifty States or Territories of the United
States.
A valid U.S. Passport.
A valid government issued identification card issued by a federal, state, county or
city agency.
d.
e.
f.
As noted above, only a valid government issued identification card issued by a federal,
state, county or city agency is acceptable, providing it complies with the below
requirements. (25660 B&P).
a. Name of person.
b. Date of birth.
c.
Physical description.
Photograph.
Currently valid (not expired).
.
d.
e.
Applicant will ensure all employees involved with the sales, service and identification
checks for the purpose of any sales of alcoholic beverages is trained in the proper
procedures and identification checks. The Temecula Police Department provides free
training for all employers and employees involved in the service and sales of alcoholic
beverages. It is the responsibility of the applicant to set up a training session for all new
employees working at Stellar Cellar, LLC. Contact the Crime Prevention and Plans
Officer at (909) 695-2773 to set up a training date. Training must be completed prior to
the grand opening of this business.
Miscellaneous:
a.
On Sale Beer and Wine - Public Premises - Authorizes the sale of beer and
wine for consumption on or off the premises where sold. No distilled spirits may
be on the premises. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section
25663.5 of the B&P (Business & Profession Code) for exception, musicians.
Food service is not required.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, I understand and I accept all the
above-mentioned Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be
maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish
to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Printed Name
Date
.
Applicant's Signature
R:\PC&NIPA04-0442 Stell" Cell" LLCIDmft CofA,doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.3
ABC LICENSE TYPES AND SUMMARY AND CENSUS TRACT MAPS
R,\PC&NIPAO4-0442 Ste[[", Ce]¡', LLC\PC Stoff Repo't.doc
Department of Alooholic Beverage Control
COMMON ABC LICENSE TYPES
AND THEIR BASIC PRIVILEGES
Stole of Califom;a
.
ABC-616 (4/04)
BEER MANUFACTURER - (Large Brewery) Authorizes the sale of beer to any person holding a license
authorizing the sale of beer, and to consumers for consumption on or off the manufacturer's licensed
premises. Without any additional licenses, may sell beer and wine, regardless of source, to consumers for
consumption at a bona fide public eating place on the manufacturer's licensed premises or at a bona fide
eating place contiguous to the manufacturer's licensed premises. May conduct beer tastings under
s ecified conditions Section 23357.3 . Minors are allowed on the remises.
WINEGROWER - (Winery) Authorizes the sale of wine and brandy to any person holding a license
authorizing the'sale of wine and brandy, and to consumers for consumption off the premises where sold.
Authorizes the sale of all wines and brandies, regardless of source, to consumers for consumption on the
premises in a bona fide eating place that is located on the licensed premises or on premises owned by the
licensee that are contiguous to the licensed premises and operated by and for the licensee. May possess
wine and brandy for use in the preparation of food and beverage to be consumed at the bona fide eating
place. May conduct winetastings under prescribed conditions (Section 23356,1; Rule 53). Minors are
allowed on the remises.
OFF SALE BEER & WINE - (Package Store) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for conswnption off
the remises where sold. Minors are allowed on the remises. '
OFF SALE GENERAL - (Package Store) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for
consum tion off the remises where sold. Minors are allowed on the remises.
SMALL BEER MANUFACTURER - (Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) Authorizes the same privileges and
restrictions as a Type 0 I. A brewpub is typically a very small brewery with a restaurant. A micro-brewery
is a small-scale brewery operation that typically is dedicated solely to the production of specialty beers,
althou h some do have a restaurant or ub on their manufacturin lant.
ON SALE BEER - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer for conswnption on or off the premises
where sold. No wine or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Full meals are not required; however,
sandwiches or snacks must be available. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE BEER & WINE - EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for
consumption on or off the premises where sold. Distilled spirits may not be on the premises (except
brandy, rum, or liqueurs for use solely for cooking purposes). Must operate and maintain the licensed,
premises as a bona fide eating place. Must make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the nonnal
meal hours that they are open, at least fiye days a week. Nonnal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. -
9:00 a,m., II :00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m: - 9:00 p.m. Premises that are not open five days a week
must serve meals on the da s the are 0 en. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE BEER.& WINE - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer and wine
for consumption on or off the premises where sold. No distilled spirits may be on the premisés. Minors are
not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5 for exception, musicians). Food service is not
re uired. '
ON SALE GENERAL ~ EATING PLACE - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled
spirits for consumption on the licensed premises. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for consumption off
the licensed premises. Must operate and maintain the licensed premises as a bona fide eating place. Must
make actual and substantial sales of meals, during the nonnal meal hours that they are open, atleast,fiye
days a week. Nonnal mealtimes are 6:00 a.m. . 9:00 a.m., 11:00 a,m. - 2:00 p.m., and 6:00 p.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Premises that are not open five days a week must serve meals on the days they are open. Minors are
allowed on the remises.
ON SALE GENERAL - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Night Club) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and
distilled spirits for consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine for
consumption off the premises where sold. Minors are not allowed to enter and remain (see Section 25663.5
for exce tion musicians. Food service is not re uired.
ON SALE GENERAL:" SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges and restrictiòns as providcd for a
Type 47 license except it is issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed oÌ1the
license certificate, .
(,d~:CD"<:',;-o
iL'.'.:,\I\D)
7<C ,...
O'/OL"'"
CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold. No off-sale privileges. Food service is not required. Minors are
allowed on the remises.
VETERAN'S CLUB - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only,
for consumption on the premises where sold, Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guest
only, for consumption off the licensed premises, Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the
remises.
SPECIAL ON SALE GENERAL - Generally issued to certain organizations who cannot qualify for club
licenses, Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits, to members and guests only, for
consumption on the premises where sold. Authorizes the sale of beer and wine, to members and guests
only, for consumption off the licensed premises. Food service is not required. Minors are allowed on the
remises.
ON SALE BEER AND WINE - SEASONAL - Authorizes the same privileges as a Type 41, Issued for a
s ecific season, Inclusive dates of 0 eration are listed on the license certificate.
ON SALE BEER - SEASONAL - Authorizes the sale of beer only for consumption on or off the
premises where sold, Issued for a specific season. Inclusive dates of operation are listed on the license
certificate. Wine or distilled s irits ma not be on the remises. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE BEER - PUBLIC PREMISES - (Bar, Tavern) Authorizes the sale of beer only for
consumption on or off the licensed premises, Wine or distilled spirits may not be on the premises. Minors
are not allowed to enter and remain warnin si ns re uired . Food service is not re uired.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN - Authorizes the sale of wine purchased from a licensed winegrower or
wine wholesaler only to registered guests of the establishment for consumption on the premises. No beer
or distilled spirits may be on the premises. Wine shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
wine shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy accommodation. Removal of wine
from the ounds is not ennitled. Minors arc allowed on the remises.
ON SALE GENERAL - RESTRICTIVE SERVICE - Authorizes the sale or furnishing of beer, wine
and distilled spirits for consumption on the premises to the establishment's overnight transient occupancy
guests or their invitees. This license is nonnally issued to "suite-type" hotels and motels, which exercise
the license rivile es for ests' "com limenta "ha hour. Minors are allowed on the remises.
ON SALE GENERAL - BIŒWPUB - (Restaurant) Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
for consumption on a bona fide eating place plus a limited amount of brewing of beer. Also authorizes the
sale of beer and wine only for consumption otTthe premises where sold. Minors are allowed on the
remises.
BED AND BREAKFAST INN - GENERAL - Authorizes the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits
purchased from a licensed wholesaler or winegrower only to registered guests of the establishment for
consumption on the premises. Alcoholic beverages shall not be given away to guests, but the price of the
alcoholic beverage shall be included in the price of the overnight transient occupancy acconunodation.
Removal of alcoholic bevera es from the rounds is not ennitled. Minors are allowed on the remises.
-"wuc
t~~ ~, .,a~
\c:~J
OJfO,^""
ABC-616 (4/04)
.
.
.
2000 Census Tract Boundaries
~ 30~ 0
L~
3000 6000 Feet
----,
N
A
"I¡¡¡"'.~u, d,ta\œ~u,2000..p'
.
.
ITEM #6
.
.
CITY OF TEMECULA '
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
'MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
Planning Commission
Matthew Harris, Associate Planner
DATE:
SUBJECT:
August 4, 2004
Exterior Material Change for Jefferson Avenue Inn (PAOO-0507)
On November 19, 2003, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. 00-0507, a
Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a three-story, 56-unit hotel complex
consisting of 31,600 square feet. The 1,35 acre site is located 200 feet east of Jefferson Avenue
and 200 feet north of Winchester Road.within the existing Rancho Temecula Plaza,
A decorative beige "Belgian Castle Stone" veneer was approved by the Commission to be applied
to various columns and offsets on each building elevation. Since that time, the Rancho Temecula
Plaza Association Architectural Committee has reviewed the elevations and has determined that
the proposed decorative stone veneer would not be compatible with other existing buildings within
. the Plaza which have a red brick decorative veneer. The Committee has requested that the
decorative stone veneer be replaced with a thin red brick veneer. The project applicant has now
applied to the City for an Administrative Development Plan to make the material change. In
addition, the applicant is requesting that various exterior colors be changed so as to be more
compatible with the proposed red brick veneer (see attached material sample board).
Staff has evaluated the proposed material and color changes and has determined that the
decorative red brick veneer and proposed colors would both match and compliment the existing
buildings onsite and are consistent with applicable City-Wide Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission approve the requested material and color changes
listed below: '
Material
Color
Decorative Brick Veneer
Metal Windows & Storefronts
Canvas Awnings
Buildin9 Base
Building Field
Fascia & Ornamental Bands
HC Maddox ,"Old Town Red"
Dark Bronze .
To Match Color of Building Base
Frazee 8724M "Meadowlark"
Frazee 8721W "Clay Beige"
Frazee 181 "White Shadow"
Attachments
.
R:ID P12000100-0507 Hampton Inn SuiteslBuilding Material Modification Memo..doc
1
.
.
¡.;::..-~.~"o<.
.~.
J "0---"""""'-----"
.:' '",
~~~"ð[1~ ~~,' .: ;1\\ Bi)
- -~~,~
z
0
¡:::
c::C
:>
w
...J
W
::I:
I-
::J
0
en
(f)
Z
0
¡::
«
>
w
..J
W
IT
0
õ:
W
l-
X
W
.
ITEM #7
.
.
.
.
..
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
, CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 2004
Planning Application No. PA04-0477 (Development Code Amendment) ,
Prepared By: Dale West, Associate Planner'
RECOMMENDATION:
The Community Development Department - Planning Division Staff
recommends the Planning Commission adopt a Resolution entitled:
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINAN'CE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
OFFICE BUILDINGS IN' BUSINESS PARK AND LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL ZONES", (PLANNING APPLICATION 04-0477)
BACKGROUND
The Development Code was adopted by the City Council in 1995. Since its adoption, the Code has
been periodically amended to modify various provisions as opportunities have been identified and to
improve its clarity. The Development Code currently permits "Offices, administrative or corporate'
headquarters with greater than 50,000 square feer' in the Light Industrial (LI) and Business Park
(BP) zones. The Code also permits "Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 square
feet" in the BP zone but prohibits them in the LI zone. The City currently has pending applications
for projects with multiple small office buildings of less than 50,000 square feet in the LI zone. In the
past the City has allowed multiple buildings if the total cumulative square footage was greater than
50,000. However there are circumstances where the site is not large enough to allow 50,000 square
feet of building area. Staff believes that these smaller buildings can be allowed if there are design
criteria to achieve an appropriate development.
Based upon this situation staff is recommending that three changes be made to the Development
Code.
To permit offices, administrative or corporate headquarters in the BP and LI zones,
regardless of square footage. -
To permit'profe~sional service offices in all zones, regardless of total square footage.
. To add periormance standards for designing sites with smaller office buildings in the BP and
LI zones. .
R:IOrdinanceslPertonnance Stds .Office in BP and LI ZoneslPC Staff Report.doc
, 1
ANALYSIS
The amendment proposes to remove the 50,000 square foot requirement for both categories
of office uses (administrative or corporate headquarter offices and professional service
offices) in both the BP and LI zones. This change would allow any size office building in
either zone. The amendment also proposes supplemental periormance standards for small
office uses in both the BP and LI zones. These periormance standards would promote
consistency with office buildings and encourage enhanced site design. The supplemental
performance standards would encourage fewer multi-story buildings when possible and
would require connecting courtyards and plazas between buildings when development
projects with smaller buildings are proposed. These standards support desirable
characteristics of site design by placing emphasis on the orientation of buildings to achieve
compatible scale to the surrounding area and to retain future opportunities for business
growth and expansion. Periormance standards to achieve this include but are not limited to
the following:
1.
Fewer buildings with multiple-stories are preferred over numerous smaller buildings.
This will provide greater opportunities for larger corporate tenants that may desire an
entire building or floor.
2.
Freestanding multiple office buildings on a single site should be clustered around a
courtyard or common area sufficient to retain a pedestrian scale. This creates
opportunities for plazas and pedestrian areas while preventing long "barrack-like"
rows of buildings.
3.
When clustering is impractical, a visual link should be established between buildings.
Areas between buildings should be purposely designed shapes not simply left over
spaces between buildings.
4.
Landscaping and pedestrian scaled elements such as awnings or trellises should be
integrated into the elevation and the passageways should be safely lit.
5.
The site should be designed with features that reinforce the visual and spatial
relationship of each building, such as the use of decorative paving, landscaping, and
pedestrian amenities that complement the architectural design of the buildings."
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This amendment to the Temecula Municipal Code represents a minor change to the allowable use
in the Light Industrial zoned areas of the City, providing clarification for staff's review of project
applications. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Development Code and has
determined that the project has no potential to result in any negative impacts to the environment. As
a result, staff is recommending the Commission make a recommendation to the City Council that a
no impact finding pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act
Guidelines be made.
Attachments
1.
2.
PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 3
Standard Ordinance No. 04-- - Blue Page 6
R:\OrdinanceslPertormance Stds -Ollie. in BP and LI ZoneslPC Stall Report.doc
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
..' ,
R:\OrdinancesIPertormance Stds -Office in BP and LI ZoneslPC Stall Report.doc
3
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
'A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
'CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
OFFICE BUILDINGS IN BUSINESS PARK AND LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL ZONES", (PLANNING APPLICATION 04-0477)
WHEREAS, on November 9,1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the"
General Plan; and . . .
WHEREAS, on January 25,1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the City's
Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the City has identified a need to amend the adopted Development Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on August 4,
2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this matter;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES
HEREBY RESOLVE, DET~RMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1, Approval. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
recommends that the City Council adopt an urgency and standards ordinances amending Chapter
17.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit
A.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The Planning Commission recommends that the
City Council make a determination that the above described ordinances have no potential for an
adverse effect on the environment and that pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California
Environmental Quality Act Guidelines no further environmental analysis is required.
Section 3, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 4th day of August 2004.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\OrdinanceslPerlormance Std. .Office in BP and LI ZoneslPC Staff Report.doc
4
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the
City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August, 2004, by the following
vote of the Commissioln:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:IOrdinancesIPertormance Stds -OHice in BP and LI ZonesIPC StaH Report,doc
5
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
DRAFT STANDARD ORDINANCE NO 04--
R:IOrdinances\Pertormance Stds -Olliee in BP and LI ZoneslPC Stall Report,doc
6
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO, 04--
A RESOLUTION ÖF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING
CHAPTER 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR
OFFICE BUILDINGS IN BUSINESS PARK AND LIGHT
INDUSTRIAL ZONES". (PLANNING APPLICATION 04-0477)
WHEREAS, Section 65800 of the Government Code provides for the adoption and
administration of zoning laws, ordinances, rules and regulations by cities to implement such general
plans as may be in effect in, any such city;
WHEREAS, the continuing economic development in the Temecula Valley has created an
increased demand for office buildings to house desirable and beneficial businesses and the real
estate community has identified a present shortage of necessary and desirable professional office
buildings;
WHEREAS, the City's currently adopted LI zone development standards restrict the size and
type of office buildings that may be developed within the zoning district. However the lands with this
zoning designation are of a type and nature that would accommodate the type of development
deemed necessary and desirable;
WHEREAS, this Ordinance complies with all the applicable requirements of State law and
local ordinances;
WHEREAS, notice of the proposed Ordinance was posted at City Hall, Temecula Library,
Pujol Street Community Center, and the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on
the prop?sed amendments to the Temecula Municipal Code.
to consider
THE CITY COUNCIL ()F THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the Ciiy of Temecula hereby amends portions of Table
17.08.030 of the T emecula Municipal Code for "Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters
with greater than 50,000 sq. ft." and "Offices, professional services less than 50,000 sq. ft., including
but not limited to business law, medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering,
real estate, insurance" with the following: '
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters
Offices, professional services including, but not limited
to, business law, medical, dental, veterinarian,
chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate,
insurance
:;p§~
C C C P p5 p5
P P P P P p5 p5
R:IOrdinancesIPertormance Stds -Office in BP and LI ZoneslPC Staff Report.doc
7
Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends Table 17.08.0300fthe
Temecula Municipal Code to add Footnote No.5 to read as follows:
.
"5. Office uses permitted in the BP and U Zones are subject to Periormance Standards
contained in Section 17.08.070. E."
Section 3, The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of Section
17.08.070 of the Temecula Municipal Code by adding Subsection "E" to read as follows:
"E. Additional Periormance Standards for Office Buildings in the Business Park (BP) and
Light Industrial (LI) Zones. In orderto maintain the desirable characteristics of these zones,
office buildings must be designed to be compatible with the surrounding scale and retain
future opportunities for business growth and expansion. Periormance standards to achieve
this include but are not limited to the following:
6.
7.
Fewer buildings with multiple-stories are preferred over numerous smaller buildings.
This will provide greater opportunities for larger corporate tenants that may desire an
entire building or floor.
Freestanding multiple office buildings on a single site should be clustered around a
courtyard or common area sufficient to retain a pedestrian scale. This creates
opportunities for plazas and pedestrian areas while preventing long "barrack-like"
rows of buildings.
8.
When clustering is impractical, a visual link should be established between buildings.
Areas between buildings should be purposely designed shapes not simply left over
spaces between buildings.
.
9.
Landscaping and pedestrian scaled elements such as awnings or trellises should be
integrated into the elevation and the passageways should be safely lit.
10.
The site should be designed with features that reinforce the visual and spatial
relationship of each building, such as the use of decorative paving, landscaping, and
pedestrian amenities that complement the architectural design of the buildings."
Section 4, Severability. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this
Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any
sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 5, Environmental Compliance. The City Council hereby finds that this amendment
to the Temecula Municipal Code represents a series of minor changes regulating the
implementation of the zoning procedures and requirements that have no potential to individually or
cumulatively to impact the environment beyond that which currently exists. As a result, the adoption
of this ordinance is exempt from further environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3) of
the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines.
Section 6, Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance
and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
.
R:\OrdinancesIPertonnance Slds -Office in BP and LI ZonesIPC Staff Report.doc
8
.
Section 7, Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days
after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of
this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. '
Section 8. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect - 0 days after its passage;
and within - 0 days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members
voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this - day of -, 2004.
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
. [SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 04-- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular
meeting of the City Council on the - day of -' 2004 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was
duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of -'
2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
.
R:IOrdinances\Pertormance Stds -OHice in BP and LI Zones\PC StaH Report.doc
9
.
ITEM #8
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
File Number
PA04-0111
Project Description:
Recommendation:
CECA:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
AuÇJust 4, 2004
Dan LonÇJ
Title:
Associate Planner
Application Type: .
Development Plan
A Development Plan to construct a 31,970 square foot warehouse and
storage facility on 2.01 acres located on the north side of Winchester
Rd., approximately 1,838 feet west of Diaz Road,
I:zJ Approve with Conditions
0 Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
D Recommend Approval with Conditions
13 Recommend Denial'
I:zJ Categorically Exempt
(Class)
15332
0 Negative Declaration
0 Mitigated Négative Declaration with Monitoring, Plan
. DEIR
R:ID "2004104-0111 M"it Moving SystcmslSTAFF REPORT.dot
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Winchester Tech., LLC
.
Completion Date:
June 29, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
September 29, 2004
General Plan Designation:
(BP) Business Park
Zoning Designation:
(LI) Light Industrial
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Industrial Building
Vacant/Industrial Buildings
Storage Facility
Industrial Building
Lot Area:
87,991 sq. ft.
Total Floor Area/Ratio
.36
Landscape Area/Coverage
12,219 sq. ft. 14% (10% required per Development Code)
.
Parking Required/Provided
27 Required/29 Provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[8J 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project is a request for a warehouse and mini-storage facility totaling 31,970
square feet. Storage facilities are subject to the supplemental development standards of the
Development Code (17.10.020.N). This section includes specific standards for setbacks, lot
coverage, landscape coverage, and design. '
The supplemental development standards for storage facilities permit a zero setback from the
sides and rear property lines; however the front setback must be maintained according to the
underlying zone. Staff determined the rear and east setback may utilize a zero setback since the
adjoining parcels also have a zero setback. However staff encouraged the applicant to maintain
a five-foot setback along the western property line since there is existing landscaping and a
parking lot in this location. The setback with landscaping will provide additional screening on the
west side of the building. Staff did not want to create a "dead zone" and determined that
setbacks are not necessary on the eastern side and rear since buildings abut these respective
areas.
.
IUD 1'\2004\04-01 ¡ I M«il Mo,i"g SYslcmslSTAFF REPORT dol
.
.
.
The supplemental development standards allow for maximum lot coverage of 65%, and
minimum landscape coverage of 10%. The proposed lot coverage is 36.3% and the proposed
landscape coverage is. 14% of the project site. The applicant has provided berming with
landscaping, an employee area, meandering sidewalks and decorative stamped concrete at the
driveway. Staff encouraged the applicant to provide the required 36-inch box trees in the front of
the building rather than the rear so they will be more visible from the street. The City's
Landscape architect has reviewed the landscape plans and recommends approval.
The supplemental development standards require the design of storage facilities to be
compatible with the surrounding area in terms of design, bulk, mass, materials and colors. The
proposed project has been designed to appear as an industrial office building. The storage
spaces as well as the loading area for the warehouse are located in the rear, which will not be
visible from the street. There is a truck weighing station, which has been proposed behind a
metal gate, in order to screen large trucks to the greatest extent possible. The design, bulk,
mass and materials will blend with the surrounding uses. The main portion of the building is set
to west side of the parcel with the storage facilities in the rear (128 feet). Landscaping, berming
and the entrance havè each been designed so the building will blend with the surrounding uses
and not appear as a storage facility. The main building entry includes an angled entry towards
the driveway and includes a metal covered canopy, which presents an industrial office
appearance rather than a storage facility.
The supplemental development standards also restrict the uses and materials allowed to be
stored ,on-site. As a condition of approval, the project will be prohibited from renting outdoor
parking spaces for vehicular storage, unless the applicant requests a modification .to the
description of the business, wt)ich may require additional parking facilities. This includes
recreational vehicles, boats, trailers and other similar vehicles. There will not be any business
activity, other than rental of storage units and warehousing activity permitted on the project site.
No service or repair of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, lawn mowers or any similar equipment is
permitted. Storage shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, combustible or
explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals.
The project meets the intent Design Guidelines. The entrance to the building is angled towards
the street and includes a decorative metal trellis over the entry. The front elevation along
Winchester Road includes projections with variations in the roof line. The applicant has proposed
reveal lines with glass and tiles to provide interest. Decorative cornices are proposed on top of
the projections. Glass is proposed on the second story to appear as an office building. In
addition, the projections include doors to appear as secondary office entries. Two metal trellis',
designed to match the metal trellis over the entry, are proposed between the building projections
and will be planted with vines. Decorative stamped concrete is proposed to the office entry to
further accentuate the office entry.
The proposed project meets the minimum development standards as well as the intent of the
design guidelines and the goals and policies in the General Plan.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
IðJ 1.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed' Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class
15332, in-fill)
R,II) roO04I04-0111 M"il Moving SystemslSTAFF REPORT.dol
CONCLUSION/R ECOMMEN DATION
Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms to the
City-Wide Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission
approve the proposed project subject to the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan
(Code Section 17.05.010F)
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan and with all applicable
requirements of State law and other City ordinances.
The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed project and finds that the site is
properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for the type of the
proposed use. The project as conditioned is aiso consistent with other applicabie
requirements of State law and locai ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to
occupancy, City staff will inspect all construction. The site design will provide adequate
emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 5
2.
PC Resolution No. 2004-- - Blue Page 6
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
R,ID 1'\200<104-0111 Morit Moving SystemslSTAFF REPORT.dot
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R,\D F'\2004\04-011] Merit Mo,ing5ystcmslSTAFF IŒI'ORTdot
.
. ""'~;;£,:~
'::JNl ~VDOSSV GNV ::JnJB\fÐ
..:
.,;
~~~ #~ ~..j ~¡z~
~~R ~~ u~~! #::",»:J ß
~~~ ~~ <...~ " ~I
~'~"; .o~ ::;:.: ,'" ¡.
iòiò~~~~ ~'~. §..~§~
.,~!.,. ,~::¡ z ~§~¡;'3
! ' :~ 'a-~~~:\ 6 ~¡m.
.. ~ ::!~~zo"", "~i..,
s~:\ h~~~§~~.~~~ t ~I~~I~'§
~ ~:¡;:\"i ~g;~! ::!~~~ ~~~8~ ¡ ;~g'I~1
~ ~~:¡; ~ 8~~~ ~ '~~ ;s~~i5~~ .'. ~
~ :::~gJ~2~~2§¡g i:!~Ôi!'2~ ~5~"~
:I ~~~.. 9:¡;:~:¡; .. ~~g~::;N
:¡; <ozm__m~ ~
,n
E
0
~
~
..
0
0
0
~ :Jg;g
'I'; ~ '"
§~ 2 z
"I ~~B § ~
l~~;;<o~z
" 2.' i z w
, .~! I ~æ"
N<O<
.
.
:~ .
:1 :!
~
:i
1'1 i.I
:i
II
!i
IT¡
'i Ii
" ,
~:¡~! i!!~
! p: 1<
,I I
.1 ¡Íili -.I!
11m hi¡
'. I.
, .1
" I I', I,
~ í II 1\
. ,~ I¡ I II II
I, I,',
~ Ii' . h
¡Iii II II
f-- 'I "~I'll Ii
:::> . r'
. § I¡III fIIlil
~ h!il!¡;!
Vi - ,i¡ ¡¡ ~ill .
L
~
I!
"
h
':~;:j~;;;~a: ~:;:~...
'JNI S3J.VDOSSV ONV Jlii9VÐ
-.... -------------
-----------------..
------------------
-----..--------.-
-00"'"
-------..----------
..------------------
-------------------
-----..---------..--
, 'ON .133"5 335
NOU\If1NUHOO >IQ ) ,,'n laJ"'"
i
~¡
h
i
i
¡
i
i
i
-=$
,
I
,
------t-----
,
I I
, ,
I ~ I
i '~I
-----l--L---L----
, 0 ,
I ~ I
, ;: ,
I I
, ,
I I
--I-----t----
, ,
I I
---+ ---1- ~_---I--_L
¡Ii ¡!
i 'I i ¡!
. . 'I
i i
.
,
,
I ,
i t~~~
I L__-
.
, L__-
~ ,
: .-----
-----
.
0
~
I ~-----
L__-
, , ~
1 }----
, 0-----
.-----
, }----
~
: ~-----
-----
, L__-
:¡
1 .
, L__-
.
~
, :¡--;---
~
.-----
1 ~
I f---
: ~--:---
~
.-----
1 t_-
.
I.
I ~
1 ~
'Æ:.~a: ~':;;~
-'~ ;:>NI 53..LVD05SV ONV :m g~
:>11 ' H:J3.l ~3153H:JNiM II rn I
n '
-------,._----
~
" .
: : : : : :: : : : : : I
:¡:~:~:~:V:,:,:,:,:.' I i.
,~,~,~,"~'~'~I~'~'~'~:~:~'~
NMood....
z ~
~~
a. ::1
OC 0{
0 ;:
0 ~
...J ~
LL :E
1
1
1
10
,~
1
1
1
I'
,~
~
Nou.vnNliHCXJ
HOd ) ,NIl >OJ.YW
l'~
I
i
I
I
i
i
i
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ¡
I ¡
I ¡ ,
I !
I ¡
'"
II I ~
'I . ~
I.
, ,
i ""'~.:::..~~~ I
I ':)NI ??~~~~"õif'v'j'!'J9V9 I
, -~------------
<I;
Ii
~¡
~ii 11 ~
"'~w
. ,t:::..J' 0
UJ
z
:1
UJ
'"
0
u
VI
~i
~I
~I
'1
~I-
I~
zl~
01"
-I~
!;(~
>~
wz
..J-
w~
wo(
Clz
_0
VII"
tñ~
<l;iiJ
w-
h
'I
i,
-I I I
:)11 ' HJ3..L ¡El1S3HJNIM I 11-.:- II
__I:_~-.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
~i
~I
~I
'I
~I
1-
zl~
01:1'
~I~
>w
~~
w~
wO
Clz
-0
VII"
tñ~
<l;w
w-
"
'I
Ii
'"
~
z
0
~
>
w
..J
W
W
CI
iñ
J:
I-
::>
0
VI
'"
.
I
¡
¡
i
I
.
.
. "
u
, <
z~
o~
¡:~
<C-
~i
w~
wüi
c:;
tñ~
:I:~
~~
Ow
z~
'Æffi7.,;;::; ~:::II:-::
':>NI 53J.\fDOSSV aNY :>nI~
'---~-- ,~-
~
¡,
"
z ~
0",
~ ~
~ ~
-J a
w -
~ §
- z
UI a
:I: ~
~ ~
0 w
Z -
:>n ' H:J3.I. ¡ 3JS3H:>NIM Iln !
: I .
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
il
Ii
Ii
z
0
~
~
-J
W
W
c
tñ
Iñ
w
::
~-~""--~'-'-""-'@ e--
,"::.:;'" "';;'~;;';;:~;';;:;", '", '0.'
""" .."'~ """"", - -----, .
]~":,:;;J~~=V1 ," '~~i
oo'--_~,-m~~,_~_~- ,C
~ll~;~::= '~ :a ~~!;!
II:
z
«
...J
c...
01
z,
~~. , ~i
~ j,
Z ( ! c...!
g - >-!
a:
«,
~¡
:Ji
~I
c...,
!
!
I
I
I
I
I
¡
. ..
I! !
I\!~ I !
,I!i! ,
II" I i
i'lii
,WI¡i
~ liI.I'II.I,
21 ~'~I :i:
"" -
" , "
.. ..,
H!; ~
š L
~ ¡ ¡ ¡ Ii
~¡\~
~
~~
~
~~
I ~ :
on!
¡! i i
(','50-'" )
]0'.015- 'N,"
"---
II!!
~~
on ¡'HI!
¡ ;::: .!.... ; ,
dB""",;
! . -, > ;';!"
;~~~ ww
..:
~~
0
,-
.;
'"",.. """
"
Z
~~
i~
ê;"
g'"
""'" """
'"",.. "'"
--
( ','5 nO'< )
]0'.01'- 'N'"
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
RolJ) 1'\2004\04-0111 Mccit Moving Systcms\STAFF REI'ORT,dot
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0111, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 31,970
SQUI\RE FOOT WAREHOUSE AND STORAGE FACILITIES ON
2.01 ACRES, LOCATED- ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
WINCHESTER ROAD, APP.ROXIMATELY 1,838 FEET WEST
. OF DIAZ ROAD, KNOWN AS APN: 909-31 0~020 AND 909-310-
021. .
WHEREAS, Gabric & Associates, initiated Planning Application No. PA04-0111
(Development Plan), in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development
'Code; .. . . .
WHEREAS, Planning Application No. PA04-0111 (Development Plan) was processed
inèluding, but not limited to public notice, in the timely manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, notice of ' the proposed Development Plan was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and loc'ållaw;
WHEREAS, the Planning Còmmission considered Planning Application No. PAO4-0111
(Development Plan) on August 4, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law,'at
which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in
support or opposition to this matter; ,
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the Planning Commission approved PA04-0111 (Development Plan);
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING' COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Tha,t the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference. .
Section 2. Findinas. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. PA04-0111 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.020.F of the
City of Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for the City of
Temecula and with all the applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city;
The Planning Commission has reviewed the proposed próject and finds that the site is
properly pianned and zoned and found to be physically suitabie for the type of the
proposed use. The project as conditioned is also consistent with other applicable
requirements of State law and local ordinance, including the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA).
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public,
health, safety and general welfare.
11:\0 P\2004\04.0111 Merit Moving SystemslOraft Reso and COAs,doc
,
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to
occupancy, City staff will inspect ail construction. The site design wiil provide adequate
emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site
Section 3, Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning
Application No. PA04-0111 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15332 (In-Fill Development Projects, Class' 32). This project is an in-fill development
and it meets the following criteria:
A. The site is 1.01 acres, which is less than 5 acres.
B. The proposed development is consistent with the existing development in the
area.
.
C.
D.
The site has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species.
The site will be adequately served by public utilities and services.
Section 4, Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission, hereby
approves Planning Application No. PA04-0111 for a 31,970 square foot, warehouse and storage
facility located on the north side of Winchester Road, approximately 1,838 feet west of Diaz
Road. The Conditions of Approval are contained in Exhibit A.
Section 5, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 4th day of August 2004.
.
ATTEST:
John Telesio, Chairperson
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
{SEAL}
.
R:\D P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Resa and COAs.doc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
) .
) ss
)'
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-~ was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4'h day of August 2004, by the
following vote:
AYES: '
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
, R:\D P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
RID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
. DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROV AL
Planning Application No, PA04-0111
Project Description:
A Development Plan for a 31,970 square foot
warehouse and storage facility located on the north
side of Winchester Road, approximately 1,838 feet
west of Diaz Road, (APN: 909-310-020 and 909-310-021)
Development Impact Fee: Industrial
MSHCP Fee:
Industrial
TUMF Fee:
Industrial
Approval Date:
August 4, 2004
Expiration Date:
August 4, 2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California
Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the
applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Division the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
RID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslPraft Reso and COAs,doc
5
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
.
3.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
4.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three, one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
5.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan,
contained on file with the Planning Department.
6.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved (Conceptual Landscape Plan)
contained on file with the Planning Department. Landscaping installed for the project
shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of
Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of
Planning shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping
into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all
landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in
interest.
.
7.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
8.
This Development Plan may be revoked pursuant to Section 17.05.010 of the City's
Development Code.
9.
If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural
resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of
cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately
advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other
disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at
his/her sole discretion may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems
reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully
qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the
significance of the find. Upon determining that the determination is not an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining
that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall
notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until
a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Director of
Planning.
10.
.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
R:ID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslOraft Resa and COAs,doc
6
.
.
.
20.
22.
23.
deemed satisfied by staff prior to approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish, technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of
that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
11.
The applicant shall paint a 3-foot x 3-foot section of the building for Planning Department
inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building.
12.
All downspouts shall be internalized.
13.
All mechanical and roof top equipment shall be screened from public view.
14.
All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the,
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is. not
to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
, light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees. '
À landscape maintenance program shall be s~bmitted for approval wit~ the landscape
construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials
to assure proper growth ,and landscape development for the long-term aesthetics of the
property. The approyed maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsibleto carryout the detailed program.
15.
16.
All stamped concrete shall be decorative and/or colored, subject to the approval of
Planning Director.
17.
In no case shall any parking spaces'be rented as, or used for veh(cle storage.
18.
Any business activity, other than rental of storage, units and interior warehouse is
prohibited. On-site sales of merchandise, garage sales and transfer/storage businesses
which uti_lize vehicles as part of the business is prohibited.
19.
Service' or repairing,of motor vehicles, boats, trailers, I,\wn mowers, tractors or similr
equipment is prohibited.
Storage units shall not be used for the storage of flammable liquids, highly combustible
or explosive materials, or hazardous chemicals. .
Truck 'or vehicle rental is prohibited without obtaining all necessarY approvals subject to
the Development Co'de Schedule of Permitted Uses. . '.'
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
21.
Prior to issuance of building permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval for a
parcel merger. In addition, a Certificate of Compliance shall be submitted and approved,
prior to issuance of a building permit. Applicant shall submit yerification that the parcel
merger has been recorded and new grant deeds have been recorded.
A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. .
RID P\2004\O4-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs,doc
, 7
24.
25.
26.
27.
The applicant shall submit a detailed plan for the employee area. The employee area
shall include decorative furniture and hardscape to match the style of the building
subject to the approval of the Planning Director.
.
An appropriate method for screening the gas meters and other externally mounted utility
equipment shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department.
A Consistency Check fee shall be paid per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "F", or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, genus,
species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent
with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the following
items:
a.
Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Prior to Building Occupancy
28.
29.
The property owner shall fully install all required landscaping and irrigation, and submit a
landscape maintenance bond in a form and amount approved by the Planning
Department for a period of one -year from the date of the first occupancy permit.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
30.
31.
Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings or walls shall be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police
Department immediately so a report can be taken.
All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
Unless otherwise noted, the Developer at no cost to any Government Agency shall complete all
conditions. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all existing and
proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage
.
R:\D P\2004\O4-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs,doc
8
.
.
.
courses, and their omission may requirè the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
General Requirements
32.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work
and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City~maintained street right-of-way.
33.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within anexisting.or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City'
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Depart":1ent of Public Works.
a.' Street improvements, which máy inclúde, but not ,limited to: sidewalk, drive
approach, storm drain facilities and sewer and domestic water systems.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
The Developer sh'all po~t security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in - conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a, (egistered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check.' The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared' by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions'of the site, and
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact 'of ground shaking and
liquefaction. .
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources' Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown t~ be exempt. '
,As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego'Regional Water Quality Control Board
R:ID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
9
42.
43.
b.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
Planning Department
Department of Public Works
Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
.
c.
d.
e.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
44.
45.
46.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard 800, 801, 802 and 803.
Concrete ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages in accordance
with City of Temecula Standard No. 400, 401 and 402.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
.
b.
c.
d.
e.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
f.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a.
Improve Winchester Road (Major Highway Standards - 100' RNJ) to include
installation of sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer).
47.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
.
R:\D P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
10
.
.
.
48.
49.
A construction area l:raffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director'of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee,. District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form- of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordanêe with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipai Code 'and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of ã Certificate of Occupancy
50.
51.
.53.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District'
b.
Eastern Municipal Water ,District
Department of Pubiic Works'
c.
52.
All public improvements shall be constructed and comp'leted per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction" of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works. '
Building Department
54.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, ,and th~ Temecula Municipal Code.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation U~iform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03.-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
55.
56.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown çm electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly up~n adjoining property or'public rights-of-way.
R:IP P\2Q04104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
11
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1,1998)
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
70.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
71.
Show all building setbacks.
72.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
.
R:ID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs,doc
12
.
.
.
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
73.
74.
75.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
All perimeter landscaping, fencing, parkways including areas within the ROWand on site
lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or a private maintenance association.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
76.
77.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
If additional streetlights will be installed as a result of this project then prior to building
permit or installation of streetlights,-, the developer hhall complete the TCSD application
'process, submit an approved Edison Streetlight Plan and pay the appropriate energy
fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD maintenance program.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
78.
79.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Prevention Bureau
reviews building plans. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California
Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFe), and related codes, which are in force
at the time of building, plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commerCial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2375 GPM
at 20-PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 3225 GPM with a 4-hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
80.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III"B:1. A minimum of 3 hydrant, in a combination of on-site and
off"site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
81.
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required, (CFC 903.2)
R:ID P\2004\O4-0111 Merit Moving SystemsIDraft Reso and COAs,doc
13
82.
83.
84.
85.
86.
87.
88.
89.
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Departl)lent vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
suriace for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather suriace designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902) .
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall .
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, and spacing and minimum fire
flow standards. After the local water company signs the plans, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3,901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial and industrial buildings shall
have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite numbers a minimum of six (6)
inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of six (6) inch high letters and/or
numbers on both the front and rear doors as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau.
(CFC 901.4.4)
90.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
91.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
.
R\P P\2004\04-0111 Merit Moving SystemslOraft Reso and COAs.doc
14
.
.
.
92.
93.
94.
95.
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the màin entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) .
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department' access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
Special Conditions
96.
97.
Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted
and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire
and life safety measuresper 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
98.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
99.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
100.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 29, 2004 from the
Riverside County Building and Safety Department.
RIP P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
15
101.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter date stamped April 8, 2004 from the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
102.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 1, 2004 from the Rancho
California Water District.
103.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 2, 2004 from the
Riverside County Department of Environmental Health.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
RID P\2004104-0111 Merit Moving SystemslDraft Reso and COAs.doc
16
.
.
.
CNTY R I V BLOG & SFTY
x: 909-955-2023
Jun 29 20(
7: 18
P.01
--
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TRANSPORTATION AND
LAND MANAGEMENT AGENCY
Building and Safety Department
James J. Mjl/er
Director
,
June 29, 2004 .
EnGEN Corporation
Fax: (909) 296-2237
Attention: Ramon Chavez
RE:
County Geologic Report No. 1286 ,
City of Temecula Project No. PAO4-0111, Merit Moving Systems
County Geologic Report (GEO) No, 1286 was prepared for this project (City of Temecula Project # P A04-
0111, Merit Moving Systems) and consists of the folloWing documents:
.
1. NorCaJ Engineering, January 19,2004, "Geotechnical Engineering Investigation, Proposed Industrial
Development, 42211 to 42235 Winchester Road, Temecula, California". .
2. EnGen C()rporation, February 18, 2004, "Literature Review of Published Fault Investigation Data,
Proposed Storage Facility, Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 909-310-020 and 909-310-021, Lots 92 and,93
ofPan:d Map 21383, Winchester Road, City of Temecula, County or Riverside, CaJiforniji".
3, NorCal Engineering, April 30, 2004, "Re~ponse to County Geotechnical Report Review Sheet,
Proposed Industrial Development - 42211 to 42235 Winchester Road, Temecula, California".
4. EnGen Corporation, May 17, 2004, "Response to Review Comments, County Geologic Report No,
1286, Proposed Storage Facility, Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 909-310-020 and 909-310-021; Lots 92
and 93, Pan:el Map 21383, Winchester Road, City of Temecula, County or Riverside, Califo~ia'~.
5. NorCal Engineering, June 11,2004, "Response to County Geotechnical Report Review Sheet dated,
June 10,2004 - Proposed Industrial Development - Located at 42211 to 42235 Winchester Road,
Temecula, California".
6. EnGen Corporation, June 25, 2004, "Response to Review Comments No 2, County Geologic Report
No. 1286, Proposed Storage Facility, Assessor'~ Pan:d Nwnbers: 909-310-020 and 909-310;021, Lots
92 and 93, Parcel Map 21383, Winchester Road, City of Temecula, County or Riverside, Ca¥fornia".
.
County Admj¡ùstrauve Center
4080 Lemon Street, 2nd Floor
Riverside, CA 92501
CNTY R I V BLDG & SFTY
x: 909-955-2023
Jun 29 201
7: 18
P. 02
OEO No. 1286 concluded:
1. No faults or restricted use zones were found within the site limits, and only a portion of the site lies
within the A-P zone (fault zone),
.
2. The potential for liquefaction at this site is considered to be low.
3, The proposed development is acceptable from a geotechnical engineering standpoint.
4. It is not necessary to conduct additional field work to evaluate the potential for fault rupture because
the entire site lies outside the previously established restricted use zone (RUZ) and no active vaulting
was observed during grading.
5. EnOen accepts the work perfonned to date and accepts the responsibility of geotechnical engineer of
record.
CEO No. 1267 recommended:
1. No structural setbacks are required for the proposed development.
2. All grading and construction of the development should be observed by the geotechnical engineer of
record.
3, All upper fi11Jdisturbed soils shall be removed to competent native material.
OEO No. 1286 is hereby accepted for planning purposes. Engineering and other Uniform Building Code
parameters where not included as a part of this review. Engineering and other building code parameters
should be reviewed and additional comments and/or conditions may be imposed by the City's Builcling and
Safety Department upon application for grading and/or building pennits.
.
Please call me at (909) 955-6863 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
RIVERSIDE COUNTY BUJLDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT
James J. Miller, Building and Safety Director
. Jones, Associate Engineering Geologist
cc:
Applicant: Winchester Tech, LLC, Fax: (909) 245-1161
Planner: Dan Long, ,City of Temecula Office, Fax: (909) 694-6477
CGS - AP Progr~: William Bryant, via US Mail
File: Temecula Review, GEOO1286, PA04-0111
.
Y:\OeologylTemccul, Rcview,IPAO4-01l1 (Of GEOO1286,doc
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
;eneral Manager-Chief Engineer
.
.
.
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955,1200
909.788.9965 FAX
51180:'
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
~Œ@ŒDmŒ~
W APR 0.8 2004 W
City of Temecula
Þ~s~n¿'ìjJ,c~e¡f;~~~f5
Temecula. California 92589-9033
Attention: DOJ'\ Loo~
Ladies and Gentlemen:
By
Re:
PM'- -611.1...
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases. Distnct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific ,Interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, 'other regional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drairiage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided. , '
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public'
health and safety or any other such issue:
..L
This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed. '
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept' ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrahve fees will be
required. . '
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted,
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will
be required for District acceptance. Pian check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
b~~~n~~je~\~~ \~~a~~1C~~~~i~~~eli~~; ~~~~e b~~~~~~p~~~~~1iee ~sT~~~,,~~ ~a~~h~~~~
check or money order only to tfle Fiood Control District prior 0 issuance of building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the ,actual
permit.
X-
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES/ permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board: Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal,Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flooå plain, then, the City should
, require the applicant to provide all stuåies, calculations, plans and other Information required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map. Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map RevIsion (LOMR) pnor to
occupancy.
If a natur~1 watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these reqUIrements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit. ,
c:
Very truly yours,
~4-
ARTURO DIAZ .
Senior Civil ngineer
Date: 7,' ;:: ¿øc/
1'If'! ~
@
Rancho
Water
\ï\ì [?, \"i.".' !.CJ ï!J Œ rn
!\ ~~ ,-,,1) ,--
üU MAR U Z 2004
.
March I, 2004
By
Bo.nlofDi,~.."
Dan Long, Project Plarmer
City of Temccula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
J"hn E. lIon,lond
P",,",n'
C,.ho F. Ko
S" Vi" I'",id",'
SO'ph,n J. C"~n,,
Halph II. Dnily'
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
PARCELS NO. 92 AND NO. 93 OF PARCEL MAP NO,
21383; APN 909-310-020 AND APN 909-310-021
WINCHESTER TECH, LLC
Hen H- Dcak,
U",O,II"m"n
.¡"haV. H",,;
om"rn,
Dear Mr. Long:
H,i"nd.ll,.dy
G"",.I""n.",
I'hillipL. F,,"","
Di~",ofFi.."..,~T,,""'m
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho Califoll1ia Water District (RCWD). Water and sewer
service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site
and/or off-site water and sewer facilities and the completion of financial
a'rrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
.
E.I'. 'B"h'l~m"",
Di'_'orE..",..m'..,
K,nnelh C. """'y
"'",,'" "ro""",'i","
&M.int""',n
~:~;;;',':.:,L""'k If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
Lind" ". '-"."", and requirements.
Di."¡,, S~M.ryIAdmi,i"rnli"
S"~"""n..n,",
C, ""hod C"wn"
H,," n". & Kei"" LLI'
G"".ICo"...,,1
Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RC\VD.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (909) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~ß~
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
04\SB:atO5l\FCF
Ho""h"Colif""'¡oW""",,¡,'ei"
""'W¡n"""",.",d' 1'""om",n",OOJ1' "'"""",lo,C..I"o"i.'25899017' """,290,6900' FAX (90", 290,6860
(
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. COMMU1';dY HEALTH AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
¡.."Iarch 2. 2004
City of Temecula Planning Depaltlllent
P.O. Box 9033
T"mecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Dan Long
RE:
Plot Plan No. I'AO4-0111
Dear Mr. Long:
1. Department of Environmental 'Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. PA04-0il] to construct a
37,970 sq: ft warehouse and storage facility on 2.01 acreS and has no objections. Water and
sewer services should be available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF HUlLDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD
BE REQUIRED: ,
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
.
b) If there arc to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330.
c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance lelter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (600-6333) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
. Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
. Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
. Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 65 1.2).
. Waste reduction managerytent.
mŒ@ŒDWŒm
W MAR 0 4 2004 æJ
Sincerely,
.~
Sam Martinez, Supervising En' nmentat Health Speciatist
(909) 955-8980
_NOTE: Any current additional'requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmentall-lealth clearance.
Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
By
cc:
local Enlorcement Agency' PO, Box 1280, Riverside, CA 92502.1280' 1909) 955-8982 . FAX (909) 781.9653 . 4080 Lemon Street, 9th Flom. Riverside. CA 92501
lAnd U.. And Water Engineering' PO, Box 1206. ffive",ide, CA 925{)2.12Di' . (909) 955.8980 . FAX (909) 955-8903 . 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Roor, Riverside, CA 92501
.
ITEM #9
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August4,2004
Matthew Harris
Title:
Associate Planner
File Number
PA 02-0661
Application Type:
Conditional Use Permit &
DevelopmentPlan
Pr'oject Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
A Conditional Use Permit and Development.Plan to construct a
12,610 square-foot two-story church facility addition consisting of
sanctuary, classrooms, offices, remodeled main entrance, multi-
purpose room and pad for a future parsonage on 5.0 acres located
at 31087 Nicolas Road.
!8J Approve with Conditions
0 Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
0 Recommend Approval with Conditions
0 Recommend Denial
!8J Categorically Exempt
Class 32, In-Fill Development
0 Negative Declaration
0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan'
OEIR
R:IC U P12002\O2-O66 I Calvary Baptist ChurchlCHURCH STAFF REPORT.doc
I
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Calvary Baptist Church
Completion Date:
December 8, 2002
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
August 15, 2004 (With Extension)
General Plan Designation:
Very Low Density Residential (VL)
Zoning Designation:
Very Low Density Residential (VL)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Residential
Residential
Church (Under Construction)
Vacanti
Lot Area:
5.0 Acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio
12,610/NA
Landscape Area/Coverage
3,2 Acres/47%
Parking Required/Provided
34 Spaces Required/116 Provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[8J 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
(or)
01.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff:
R:IC U 1'11002\02-0661 Calvary Baptist Chu,chICHURCH STAFF REI'ORT,doc
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
ANALYSIS
The Calvarý Baptist Church is proposing to expand their existing 8,843 square-foot facility to
accommodate,a growing congregation. The proposed 12,61 0 square-foot expansion includes a
larger sanctuary, Sunday school classrooms, office space, mulli,purpose room, rèmodeled
main entrance and pad for a future parsonage which will be approved under separate permit.
The existing church facility was constructed prior to City incorporation. Development Code
SeCtion 17.06,030 allows for religious institutions in the Very Low Density Residential (VL)
zoning district subject to a Conditional Use Permit. The French Valley Airport Land Use Plan
'indicates that the project site is located in the Airport Traffic Pattern Zone which discourages
auditorium uses where large numbers of people congregate. However, Section 7.5.2 of the
Plan states that "discouraged us€!s which were lawfully established prior to the adoption of the
Plan shall be pèrmitted to be modified or enlarged," The church facility did supercede the PI~n.
The project conforms with all applicable development standards including parking, landscaping
and setback requirements. ,Parking requirements for church facilities are dete'rmined by the
number of fixed seats in the church sanctuary, which typically represents the most intensive
use of the facility. The applicants indicate that their 11 :00 a.m. Sunday morning service is the
most well attended activity at the facilitY,A total of 101 fixeØ seats will exist upon completion of
the sanctuary expansion. Development Code Section 17.24.040 requires'that one off-street
parking space be provided for each three fixed seats. Therefore, 34 parking spaces are
required. The church currently has a much larger onsite parking facility with over 1 00 parking
spaces. Onsite landscaping'will be enhanced where necessary so as to comply with current
City requirements. . .
The architectural style of the building addition will be compatible with the existing colonial style
facility. Matching materials including used brick, and colors will be utilized. The existing main
entrance to the facility will be remodeled with a porch and associated decorative columns to
achieve a more formal appearance. At staffs request, the applicants have agreed to provide a
variety of project enhancements which include wider columns and the incorporation of
decorative windows and an illuminated cross'on the multi-purpose room elevations.
Staff has determined that overall, the project is consistent, with the' General Plan and conforms
with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and development standards. specified in the
Development Code Moreover, the project conforms to the Supplemental Development
Standards for Religious Il1stitutions as specified in Development Code Section 17.06,050.N.
[8J 1.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quaiiiy Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class
32, In-Fill Development) . . .
(or)
01.
The proposèd project, as conditioned, has been determined to be cónsistent with the
previously approved Regional Center Environmental Impact Report and is exempt
from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and
Negative Declarations).
R,IC U P\2002102-066] Co]my Bop'i,! ChucchlCHURCH STAFF REPORT,doc
. )
CO N CLU SIO N/R E COM M EN DATION
.
Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the
City-Wide Design Guidelines and Development Code. Therefore, staff recommends that the
Planning Commission approve the proposed church expansion subject to the attached
conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Conditional Use Permit (Section 17.04,010,E)
1.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code.
The General Pian Land Use Designation and the Zoning of the property is Vety Low
Density Residential and religious facilities require a Conditionai Use Permit in this
Designation.
2.
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the nature, condition, and
development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and will not adversely affect
the adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
The use is compatible with the proposed religious facility to the east and other
surrounding uses.
3.
The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area,
landscaping and other development features.
.
As indicated on the Site Plan and Landscape Pian, the proposed project meets these
requirements and ali the requirements of the Development Code.
4.
The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
The proposed project meets ali Deveiopment Code and building code requirements.
Moreover, the project is compatible with the adjacent land uses, and is not detrimental
to the heaith, safety, and weifare of the community.
5.
The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on substantial
evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City
Council.
The Staff report and ali the exhibits represent the entire record for the proposed project
and support these findings.
.
K\C U P\2002102-066] Co]vary Bop!;st Chmch\CHURCH STAFF REPORT,doc
4
.
.
.
Development Plan (Section 17,05.010.F)
1.
2.
The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable provisions of
the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines,
The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physicaliy suitable for
the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and ali
construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department
staff has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the
case of a need for emergency response to the site.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 6
2.
PC Resolution No. 2004 - Blue Page 7
Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval
R:IC U 1'\2002102-0661 Calvary Baptist Ch""hICHURCH STAFF REI'ORT,do,
5
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
'UC U PI2002102-066' Co',,",y Bop!;st ChmchlCHURCH STAFF REPORTdoc
6
.
.
.
""-""60,)",..."".""""'0";'
"'16 'VO 'VOflO:IW3.L
""'5 '05 "10= 3SnIdM3L" "'"
':J.\,!] "'!ffiI'iIOL\'!]"N~ 9N1N'w¡'
[[I
"""'r.", '
,-","""..".w¿ "
<pin~:J¡5IIáDfT~
h"i
--~-
""
¡:: ~
C "';:",~
'-' ~ "",~
,~H~ U~C
'\j "'j ."': t; ~:::
" ~ .9 <J C":: ~:¡:
~ ~ .s1' ~ \} '" i;;
..i3~,a oq"'%
~!H ~¡¡'"
;:.~ ~ ,,¡¡
ð .;:"-
c3
: I
1 j ! !III
! I l' I, I I, ¡¡JI!
h I' II, 1 '!iP ,II ¡II jJ¡11
1111'11'["1' 1111 ""1'1 1"lli',I, 'hI!
, 'lI,h¡I¡!I!tIlJJllfI ltJ 1'lliIJII[l!jlflll!1
¡ ;¡II!!¡I,¡!Jllu!!If!UmlU\!H![¡lnJ!l¡!U
!I -
:<e>,.....-""",. """'""......",,,,"'w,,-
II -',I~ '
¡Ii I'! II'
It]', ,¡I. J
¡'I Î d
" ¡' 11,.'1-
.. [ ' . 'I' ,
IJf,,"...I,.'.lj, J J, I
.¡ '_Ifll¡ I
'III-IIi";, ¡
I ¡'¡ '~!1¡ i
.,)!jhi!II¡!.'!!!
I.~.'F'¡;;"
, ,
_n-- n_n--__nn-----_--n--
~I'
¡
~.H
¡¡
;
,,¡
~~
~
'I
.- '
: -~
:!
¡ I
~ ¡ ,
~ ,¡¡:j¡ ¡i
ï ,¡¡¡III!!
ð ;.. "" "
L ¡ ¡¡ f ,1
! w ,.¡k(li j
I' ¡¡¡ jiW_- !!lId
I' ii; iii I" ¡i, ii I! ¡
I '
~!!, I III I !
III ¡ iUlf II
!îI ..
"II "rr,
~; jj;! dim
" h,! ill ¡ ~¡ II I !¡!!! ! ¡¡n;
g ¡¡¡¡¡ii, ¡ J! : !! ! III!! ! II! I
,
0.
I I 11
¡¡ I ¡ II
--r--
î
¡
b
ë
,
>
!! i I! ¡ I !
p, 1 .,' . I ii'
II! I' I,' ¡ .
: ',. " i !!(i '
~ :¡ i II t If. ¡ II
Z i¡ Iii I "I! ¡
, 'I I' ¡: ' ,I' ¡ [
Ii "111.1 , !
i ",;,',:: :'.1 \.1
~ ¡ill It! 'II II"
,~ :I! JI ¡¡! I lib II
.. ... ... . ,
.
.
- !
.
.
. ' ',00,"""". ,
~,;~~;;;;;;¡:;ÊIZ;;;I';:J
"., '.
.: "",..-o"'~'."
,~,m""N"'"
UO!I!PPV'P"!l¥:J
" """,.,
'""-",("""",;"",~"(",)"",,,,
, ,. "",-"y> 'y'lil,"":ù
3 "'S 'OS ,">HO osru",]." 168" '
':>NI "'NJ~33NI"N3"KI,",'V"""
, ..
:';.,',':,>è:
""",,;:~>;
. ',," ,
I >',' LaIIL!J',;.'~-;':;~h1l'~;;)^
, I,i I ¡! !rli!tI i : ""¡'(fif:{I¡I:.
I HÍljl¡h~illllililt!';"ÍIH!I!I¡'~H¡ ,
1,~~I:~ ~:::~::~:~:~:1¡~~;:J!:t~!,1WJ~!j.~ri
J
.
.
¡
a
.
J
.
l
J
J
I
I
II
::1
-.-1
..c~----------------- ,
.
r
,J
i
!
!
1
'_n_m__--,
.~r:::;,;::'t"w, I
~>'"~J ""dóg ,úv^ivJ
"OJ
"""""'"~."
"""m,.'."N"
u°!J!PPV ¥""n~:J
i""".'
'HJ,-""'",'UJ...'HJ'-""60,"'O4d
0'><6 'YO 'y'¡¡mJV31
'-'OS 'as "OHIO 3,,",nL<3 "'"
"'.\11 '9,\1ml1~19.'" 9NI.\1NVl'
.
--_m_m___n,
i
i
¡.---",-,--,. j""'----"I
1::::::::::::11 1:::::::::::il
i
I
¡
"..",-,.¡-
¡¡-¡iWI1¡'i¡
! '¡II"
, .1-1'1'
. II
¡I!,'..
I¡q¡ll ¡II
! !!! II'
'\
"<,'; !'
;, ¡, :',: ;'¡';', ;,:J,I
, !! ,¡¡¡ Q! ,I!! !i! j ,II
! ¡, j' I' j' FF VI. ik
¡ . L!.! ! ¡ !! Hi
, ! i'~
J ,.,I,
¡ .
.
I
I,
I,
.
...1
.
.
.
---
.
",~"'(6()')
""'I{1'IwolI,"'"0~, .
~'"n~:J ¡s!¡dVH MVA/V:J
,"O,
16'" '/Q"(="'l
POO'W(O',""""
uompPV'l:1Am/;)
""rodo,"
"i""'" 16061 ")... ""'.",, (606) ooo,d
06'" 'VO 'V"ln03"31
3"" 'OS "'OHIO asIHdH31.N3 ,....
.::>", '~NI1I33>J[~.>N" ~"I>J>JVW
¡¡¡10 "," ¡.., if "" ,
111,¡'I- 1 I'III:II/!IIIJ: "III,
III ',i'"",,
i",II""11 ",11,1"'11"
, "
! If; i; I 'I
I II .1¡ I.ti ,i II"
1111111"'1'11<11"1'1'
1¡¡!¡IIII'!dH..i¡di¡I¡I'!]111
01 ',I> ».. " " 1 ',', I
1o,..... :" """""""
=
... -
o.
.
¡
.
0:
=
fIO"",16Wi
,,"', " .'m'" ""ϗ
¥""mf:J "!láVfI !ÚV^fÐ:J
"'3
I6f"'r:J"¡=.'l
"""""""""""
UO!JIPPV lf~.mlf:J
'pmd"'d
"°1-"'(6")")..."01..,,1"6)"'"
0"'" 'V~ 'V'J"n"31
3 "IS 'OS "'J"l~ 3SJ1lJ>l3.L'" "'"
':>NI '~NnI:ŒNIDN3 DNlNNY1V
.
.
.
""-"'("")"J..."","""",)"""
"""" 'VO 'V'lIJO",,'U
3"'S 'OS 3TI1fD as""""'"3 ,.."
':>NI'.:>Nrn;rn.'I.:>.'<3:""-'I!'1'1VI,-
I :
¡I !
: ! "', III
i pi ., j!
î I i ~ II ."
i 'j' I JlI'
"lli,'i¡f
,I "I 'I!
lill,1111
¡¡¡lid!!
'J
~
, i
.1
";;:J-
....~ ,
_~Im/Jlífll!l
,,"""-.",
",,~;;.5 ~~7J,7¡:ú"'lo.J
~ ,~,
'6f16'r:;:;:;';,;:;" ,
uo(;pw ~o"mi:J
,.m.,
8. .~',', " :,:~?;1 :
'\, ~,:g ~~1 '
'. " :, ~
' I ;
i ~!
!i
.
Ii " I,'. ,If Ii
¡n'¡';ii HI¡'I ¡
"I ,I i' "
,¡hUii' '! ¡,
j't ! il"
I. I' 1"
;,!I ¡¡"!"
~. I' ¡'I II
Ji'! .!,.,
,,'.'!i III!!!
'I I "¡,'¡i
II, ! ¡¡.i'I!!
Mill!i,I,!
, ,
.
"..._-
! ii' 'm¡¡¡,¡mw.,
' WUH I, ""'j""'i::,
! """ --'": " , I j
I I' 1,'1 1!!lIIIP¡ If I¡
I jI IJ II¡I!.I!,iJIIIJlII.I ¡j"
' "I !!I I I ¡ !'Ó I '
! '¡ Ii ¡!J - ,,)1 11
' ! I.!' I~ ',¡I, I !hlll
,¡,.¡;¡.¡',H~!IJJ ~"J'.".lj,-, !lhlj~!D.!U.1
11 'J I L/@[ I'JH!!o!WIT""'.ij¡
¡¡!ke"b0.0Ð0/ ,'.
) ""', II
.
-~---_..__..- ------
", , "
, .",.",i,,"
."""_",,,,'MW," '
, ~Jm~:) ,~ldo¡{'<{Ù"fV:)
",~,
""'~"'",)nJ...""-<¡á,,,",","d
, " 06'" ',5 'V'1!Diw¡u ,
, '"" '°' """'" 3SrndU3.IN' <6m
':IN) "'Nlma."I"N""Nl"'~'Y"
,;
'- ,
~-'I' ,),:,1
: ',,-,n~."'¡
:, ,,' ....., , i" '
d', '_i!t(
, " ~ '[~
'T" .:'.. ' ".'
'Jïlt: ]".",
~"f¡ ~E !",ß~"", 'i!!,"
liilUm! lit
_. I ': :'I"~'.",,',.,~,,,"
," '
'- '~
"tfj
.:'¡~
'O"",'~",,',,~:
, ,@~¡
'" 8:
.. ".~I,
'II'
..
.0,
!!n Iin II
IW IW Ii
I.. I' .
~ I !jiJ . !j
~ I .I j J ,~ ¡ ¡
! III if
~¡ì, ' ~!! !I
~!¡ !! it
~q ¡Iii ~i¡ II
g!¡ !~"" g!I,!~
!f!'I'!!,i! ,,¡¡,ilil f!: i.,! i .1; I,! ¡,¡ 'I
i!,¡¡!¡!Hill-!!jl!lI i!¡¡n,lîll!¡1iI !¡¡li!IL¡illl!¡I¡¡.
¡ ¡ iii !"U,¡,I¡ UBI!!!! '¡II ¡¡iilla! ! i!li ! Uj1, , ,II .!
illllill~ill IIIIIII¡III ill,ll!ilillll!¡llllllil!illilIIII¡/Iilllll!¡ Iii
ï ¡¡¡'i,!il/!L¡!!!'I'i!!!!!¡'U'!:'!'!!!!ìllH!l,i¡'!!1i1i¡luH;¡¡,mlll!IH'¡'!I!~I!ii!Hm!¡i
z" ".., ""'" ,¡".", n., "j! .!! I, 11""'1>."",.,"
1'"00'" ,""",;'",
I:
.
.
.
. ¡: H ,nl Í. H ! 11m !I lii!¡! iii' n 'f! ¡; ~!! ¡fl.!,!! ',. m Pili
,'1 'I II ,I ¡' Jlfl ¡i, ¡¡.! ¡ I 'II ' II i¡ Iii 'I, 'I' '¡ ,Iii' I'
¡,¡ ,,¡ I'] I, ,', J" ¡ ,¡" I I'll (" I,
~! '¡ 1\, !i! ¡¡¡IiI,IUI! !fHi i!1!Ì¡ l¡¡liJ Iii ¡¡¡;¡I! ¡¡I1!¡!)
¡¡!I 11 i ¡¡ ¡¡,!!! "'jllqWI II ¡¡hi! iii H 111!i"Ii!! i i ¡IlUil
i" Î,!I¡I!¡I!!,'I!!I!;,I!,II¡I!,!!,II¡i,,!¡'I¡'![¡Î¡t!¡J!I,JI¡i¡i¡H¡',I,I,:¡II':I'!'III:¡':.:,I,'¡!I,!¡r!!it,H ;'~'I¡îi,fjf,I!.
'n ¡Ii ! ¡!Ii HI! ¡ I hlli!l¡ , hIli ¡¡ !Ii hi j II! í!I !It! ¡!lilt:! ! !I II!! ¡III!
, , , ". . ." '.' ',"", , ,J " , , ,
'000000 Qoo, 00,0,00,00,'0'0000000
,'11 j Ii Hði'I'Tfj!!;fõi m ,I¡ir! I¡mrrl¡p¡ ¡
I - -¡,' h {I' "t'¡ I', I j' I¡ I ' "
(5ì"'iî'aIJI!tj¡;il'I;¡'!¡' I'I!
,. ,i¡ ~ ~¡,!! filII H il !J! :!'I !hlii ¡'II' ';. I'll! !
. ì' I 'I !;, ¡ '\ .:, II) 'i ! ð' I'i ¡ I" 'I ¡
¡ilk)l!: i¡ ¡I H! Î: I!¡¡'W!¡ il,i,:¡I¡lì,i i ¡:lii
¡¡I~¡U¡¡I I¡ !¡! ,¡!Jlhi!¡!¡'!¡I'L!!llì¡" !I¡Ï'¡'¡il,!I!I',¡flli!,
¡ , ' ¡ ! ¡ III I" ¡ ¡ I J Ii! ,I J .. ¡II , ' j ¡ 'I' I' ¡'!!
. , ¡ii ¡¡¡II h!¡lidlì!U¡Î !¡¡illl!! IlI!¡\ !\¡!I\IHi!n¡,
'0 0000 0'00' D '0 ~~ci~ ~ 00 ¡
i ~ -~#-- ~'. I¡ ~\
!ð "'", ,'- -, t¡
WÞ- I ~
§ ~ .
ê ~
i:;
>-
~
¡¡
,
i ~
! }
¡ "
.Ih H
¡¡ ~
~ »::
~ :{"
~~:! :
~ ";;:
;J¡
i:; ~
sit:
I
JJ,! ,\.
'\'Ii
, I "
¡i
'¡);l
! ¡ '1;
II'
i ¡ ~~;
;. ..',
;Iji
.
IrJiJOH)
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
R:\C U P\2002\O2-0ó61 C,lvocy ¡¡'plis! Church\CHURCH STAFF REPORTdoc
7
.
PC.RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA 02-0661, A CONDITI()NAL USE PERMIT AND
DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A 12,610 SQUARE
FOOT TWO-STORY CHURCH FACILITY ADDITION
CONSISTING OF SANCTUARY, CLASSROOMS, OFFICES,
MULTI-PURPOSE ROOM, REMODELED MAIN ENTRANCE
AND PAD FOR FUTURE PARSONAGE ON 5,0 ACRES. THE
SITE IS LOCATED 31087 NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS
ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 914-510-009.
WHEREAS, Calvary Baptist Church filed Planning Application No. PA 02-0661, a
Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan Application, in a manner in accord with the City
of Temecula General Plan and Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a 'regular meeting, ¿onsidered the Application
on August 4, 2004, at a duly noticed public heqring as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had ..an oPP°':Ìunity to and did testify either in ,support or in
opposition to this matter;
.
WHEREAS, a.t the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject.toand based
upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE. CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The. Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Sections 17.04.010.E & 17.05.010.F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
, , ' \ '
Conditional Use Permit (Section 17,04.010;E) .
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated
A, The proposed Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the General Plan and the
Development Code. .
The General Plan Land Use Designation and thè Zoning of the property is Very Low
Density Residential and religious facilities require a Conditional Use Permit in this
Designation,
.
R:IC U P\2002102-066] Calvary Bápt;st ChurchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
]
B. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is compatible with the nature, condition,
and development of adjacent uses, buildings, and structures and will not adversely affect the
adjacent uses, buildings, or structures.
.
The use is compatible with the proposed religious facility to the east and other
surrounding uses.
C. The site for the proposed conditional use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the yards, walls, fences, parking and loading facilities, buffer area, landscaping
and other development features.
As indicated on the Site Plan and Landscape Plan, the proposed project meets these
requirements and all the requirements of the Development Code.
D. The nature of the proposed conditional use is not detrimental to the heaith,
safety, and welfare of the community.
The proposed project meets all Deveiopment Code and building code requirements.
Moreover, the project is compatible with the adjacent land uses, and is not detrimental to
the health, safety, and welfare of the community.
E. The decision to conditionally approve the conditional use permit is based on
substantial evidence in view of the record as a whole before the Planning Commission or City
Council.
The Staff report and all the exhibits represent the entire record for the proposed project
and support these findings.
.
Development Plan (Section 17.05,010.F)
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the objectives and applicable
provisions of the General Plan, Development Code, and the Design Guidelines.
The site is therefore properly planned and zoned and found to be physically suitable for
the type and density of the proposed development. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinance.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and all
construction will be inspected by City staff prior to occupancy. The Fire Department staff
has also found that the site design will provide adequate emergency access in the case
of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section 3, Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption pursuant to Section
15332 (In-Fill Development Projects) Class 32 of the California Environmental Quality Act.
.
R,IC U 1\2002\02.0661 Calmy Bapt;" Ch",hIPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
2
.
Section 4, Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to construct a church facility addition totaling
,12,610, main entrance remodel and pad for future parsonage set forth on Exhibit A, attached
hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all necessary conditions
that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 4" day of August 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4th day of August 2004, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
R,IC U 1'12002102-0661 Calv",y Dapt;s< ChucchIPC RESOLUTION NO.doc
3
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R:\C U 1'\2002102-0661 Colvory Bopl;" ChucchlJ'C RESOLUTION NO,doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No, PA 02-0661
Project Description:
A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to
construct, a two-story church facility addition totaling
12,610 square feet on 5.0 acres. The site is located at
31078 Nicolas Roact
DIF Category:
Exempt
TUMF Category:
Exempt
'Assessor Parcel No.:
914-510-009
Approval Date:
August4,2004
Expiration Date:
August4,2006
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval ?f this Project
1.
The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice o(Exemption as provided
under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Planning Depårtment the check as'required above, the approval for the' project
granted shall be void by reasori' of failure of .condition (Fish and Game Code Section
711.4(c)).
General Reqúirements
2.
The pèrmittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of City's own election, and
hold harmless, the City and' any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its
officers, em'ployees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and
agents, to attack, set aside, void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an
approval of the City, orany agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application which action is brou9ht within the appropriate statute of
limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et
seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City
shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought
forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action
and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to, cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interes\, any unused
R:\C U P12002\()2-O661 Calvary Bap.;" ChurchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
5
portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to
either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be
responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
.
3.
This approval shall be used by the Expiration Date noted above; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or
the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
4.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Planning Department Additionally, the following
criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they
are not placed in prominent locations visible to the public. The specific location of
the equipment and method of screening shall be shown on the landscape
construction drawings.
Two 4' x 7' motorcycle spaces shall be provided onsite. The location of the
spaces shall be shown on the construction drawings.
b.
5.
The applicant shall comply with their Statement of Operations on file with the Community
Development Department- Planning Division.
6
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All parking lot lights and other
exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. Wall pack style light fixtures shall not be utilized.
.
7.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Planning Department. All mechanical and roof-
mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that
purpose as an integral part of the building
8.
Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape Plan).
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the landscaping is not
being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to require the
property owner to brin9 the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape
plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of
the developer or any successors in interest.
9.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board contained on file
with the Planning Department. Any deviation from the approved colors and materials
shall require approval of the Director of Planning.
Material
Exterior Stucco, Facia Board
Color
.
Trim and Eves:
Dunn Edwards SP1 White
Role U 1'12002\O2.()661 Cul"o" Bop';" Ch""hIPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
6
.
.
.
Roof:
Brick:
Monier Villa #231 Charcoal
Robinson Cambridge Red/flash
Rust-Oleum #7779 Black
Handrails:
10.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staff prior to approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish, technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of
that required by the condition' of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which .case the real party in interest may'appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of, approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files. .
12.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X
10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of
the colored version of approved Exhibit "E", the colored architectural elevations to the
Planning Department for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits
13.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Exhibit "H1" and "H2," or as amended by these conditions. The location,
number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans
shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied
by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal). " '
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigatiòn (in accordance with the approved
plan).
b.
c.
d.
The applicant shall submit a Certificate of Compiiance application to the Planning &
Community Development Depa~mentfor review and approval.,
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
15.
14.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
R,IC U P12ÜO2102.<J661 C,I,."" B,pl;st ChmchlPC RESOLUTION NO.doc
7
16.
17.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for
one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and
irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the bond shall be released.
.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
18.
19.
20.
21.
A Grading Permit for either rough and/or precise grading, including all on-site flat work
and improvements, shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way,
All improvement plans and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with
adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be
submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars.
The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a. Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: curb and gutter,
sidewalk, drive approach, street lights, storm drain facilities and sewer and
domestic water systems
.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
22.
23.
24.
25.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check, The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
.
lUG U 1'\2002'O2'()661 C""'C)' 8'pt;'1 Ch"",hIPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
8
.
.
.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
and identify impacts to downstceam properties and provide specific recommendations to
'protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt. . ,
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Dep.artment of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Planning Department
b. Department of Public Works
c.
Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
The Developer shall comply with all constraints' which mày be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works. . .'
A flood mitigation 'charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits" based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plàn fee or mitigation charge has already
.been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
31.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of T emecula Standard No. 207 A.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets' adjoining the site in
accordance with City Standard No. 800.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard No. 400.
Improvement plans shall extend 300 feet beyond the project boundaries.
Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City of Temecula's Standard
No. 113.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at,90 degrees.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
R:\C U P\20021O2-{)66 I Calvary Dapt;SI ChucchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
9
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
h.
Public Street improvement plans shall include plan and profile showing existing
topography, utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades
.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
a.
Improve Nicolas Road (Arterial Highway Standards - 110' R/W) to include
dedication of half-width street right-of-way, installation of half-width street
improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities,
signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer), raised
landscaped median.
b.
Improve Calle Colibri (Local Road Standards - 60' R/W) to include the
installation of sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping (including but not limited
to water and sewer).
All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement
transitions per Caltrans' standards for transition to existing street sections.
The Developer shall submit a Certificate of Compliance to the Department of Public
Works and be approved by the Director of Public Works.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Pro9ram as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
38.
39.
40.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b.
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
c.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
.
RX U 1'12002\02-0661 C,lv",y n"ptist ChucchWC RESOLUTION NO doc
10
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
.
46.
47.
48.
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
. 55.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 1998 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and ,Mechanical Codes; 1998 National Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy and Disabled Access Regulations and
the Temecula Municipal Code.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution: All'street lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rig~ts-of-way.
A receipt or clearance lettèr from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure 'the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Disabled access from the public way to the main' entrance of the building is required.
The path of travel shall meet the California Disabled Access Regulations in terms of
cross slope, travel slope stripping and signage. Provide all details on plans. (California
Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1, 1998)
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulatio'ns effective April
1,1998) "
Show path of accessibility. from parking to furthest poi,nt of .improvement.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 1998
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature 'on plans
prior to permit issuance. . .
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and. panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plan for plan check submittal.to check for handicap accessibility.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior 10 the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standard and any block walls if not on the approved
building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
R,IC U 1'\2002102-0661 Calvary Baptist ChurchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
II
56.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
0-90-04, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any
site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7;00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m,
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
57.
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 2350 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 1 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The uP9rade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required, (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2,2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
.
""C U 1'\2002\02.0661 C,'v")' l)'ptist ChucchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
12
.
.
.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
71.
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have,an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance'of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. ,After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
'presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau. for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, 'approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire' Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
70.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 1O)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the fire sprinkler riser room door. (CFC 902.4)
R:IC U PI2002\OZ-û661 Calvary Oapt;st ChucchlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
. 13
72.
73.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid
entry system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs,
Special Conditions
74.
75.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
76.
77.
If a residential dwelling is added to this project, Quimby and other residential fees,
including DIF, will be applied.
.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
78.
Prior to Issuance of Buildinq Permits
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris,
79.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
80.
The applicant shall comply with the attached correspondence from the Department of
Department of Environmental Health dated December 13, 2002.
The applicant shall comply with the attached correspondence from Rancho Water
District dated December 16, 2002.
.
R:'C U P11002\O2-o661 Calvo')' Baptist ChurrhIPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
14
.
.
.
The applicant shall comply with the attached correspondence from Riverside County
Flood Control dated February 4, 2003.
By placing my signature below,l confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions' of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any change's I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
81.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
RIC U P\2002102-066! C,!v,/}' n'ptist ChuochlPC RESOLUTION NO,doc
15
0)
)
COUN1Y OF RIVERSIDE 0 HEALTh "ERVICES AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
':'
December 13, 2002
, DEC 1 8 2002
City ofTcmccula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033 ,
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Thomas Thornsley
,.,
RE:
Conditional Use Permit P A02-066l
Dear Mr. Thornsley:
The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Conditional Use Permit P A02-066l
for the proposed addition to the Calvary' Baptist Church and REQUESTS T HAT PRIOR TOT HE CUP
APPROVAL THA T THE FOLLOWING IS PERFORMED: '
I. A C-42 state licensed plu'mber is to evaluate or locate the existing septic system. This is to ensure that
the proposed addition does not encroach on the septic system, as it is not depicted on the exhibit. This
evaluation is to be perfonned in accordance with the Riverside County Department of Environmental
Health procedures. Please have applicant cal1 this office for the specific requirements.
Note: Additional soils percolation cngineering,!nay be required prio~ to'building permit approvals.
Sincerely,
'ronmen!al Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
.
4065 County Circle Drive. Riverside, CA 92503'0 Phone (909) 358-5316 0 FAX (909) 358-5017
(Mailing Address - P.O. Box 7600 0 Riverside, CA 92513-7600) p,;""'o"",",dpa,,,@
(@
Rancho
later
ßo",',fDi,~"",
Li," D. He,man
P",ideol
Jeff,ey L. M;okJe,
S" Vi" Pre,id"ol
Stepheo.1. Co'ona
""'ph II. Dafly
Rcn R. D.-.ke
John E. Hoagland
C,oha F. Ko
om""
Joho F. Heon;g",
Geoe,.l M,nog"
Phmip 1.., "O"'"
Di,,"'" ,f F'n"o'~
'lTeaeom
>:'1', "'"h" Lem"n'
D'm'""f",gi""ing
Keoneth C. De.I,
D'","',ofOp",tioo,
& Maio"oaoee
PeITY R. Lonek
Coolmll"
L'nd. M, Frego",
Di,I,"etS~"'"ryIA'm'oi,I,"""e
SeN"" Mono",
c. M;eh..1 C"weU
Bc,1 Be" & Krieg" 1.1..1'
Geo",1 C",owl
Dccember 16,2002
DEC 1 8 2002
Thomas Thomslcy, Case Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
SUBJECT:
WATER AVAILABILITY
A PORTION OF PARCEL 29
OF PARCEL MAP 1, PAGES 44" 46
APN 957-140-009
PLANNING APPLICATION NO.PA02-066I
DcaI' Mr. Thornsley:
Please be adviscd that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water service,
therefore, would be available upon completion of financial anangements
between RCWD and the property owner.
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
Watcr availability would be contingcnt upon the property owner signing an
Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
If
questions,
please
Engineering
Services
have
contact
an
any
you
Repïe;;êntativc at this ùffiec.
Sincerely,
RANCI-TO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~ v~~~
Steve Brannon, P.E.
Development Engineering Manager
02\SRmcIIOIFOI2-T6IFCF
Rao,h" Calif"m'a Wa"', Di,t"el
m:J5W'"h"'"H,,,' - p""om"",,,O!7' Tem~"I"CMorn',92589,90!7 - (909)296.6900-FAX!909)296.6860
1995 MARKET STREET
RIVERSIDE. CA 92501
909.955.1200
909,788.9965 FAX
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
}eneral Manager-Chief Engineer
.
.
.
51180.1
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL .
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT IJi~Œ œ œ 0 W Œ~'\.:i
CilyofTemecula tl FEBO72003 /¡¡¡flil
Þ~s1nCf~c~eEf;:~o"rj t!J¡
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: 7Î-'OMAS ~;Cr<N,Li:.""1 By -., '---'
, P
Ladies and Gentlemen: Re: Pi 02- -066 I
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities, The District also does not plan check city land use cases, or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific mterest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componenf or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees), In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The District has not reviewed Ihe proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such Issue:
v
This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted, ,
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership 01 such lacilities on wntten request
of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will
be required for,,~istrict acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required,
This projett is locaied within the limiis of the'Distii~i's ", '11.1Eí¡:ï .filE :K:>A ' '1Ft'), . Area
Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adop e ; app Ica e ees ou e pal y cashier's
check or money order only to me' Flood Control District priodo issuance of building or grading permits,
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be'at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
L
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES/ permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approva should not be given until the
City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans and other mformation required to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Game and a Ciean Water Act
Section 404 Permit from the U,S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit. . "
c:
Ve,ytrulyyours, " .'
~~\\ç.K, bL-
STUART E. MCKIBBIN
Senior Civil Engineer
Date 2.- -4 - ZùO~
'sKt-1.
.
ITEM #10
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
August 4, 2004
Matthew Harris
Title:
File Number
PA03-0723
Application Type:
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
Associate Planner
Development Plan
PA03-0723 a Development Plan to construct two single-story retail
buildings consisting of 6,480 and 6,870 square feet respectively
on two parcels totaling 1.3 acres loèated at the northwest corner
of Overland Drive and Margarita Road,
I8J Approve with Conditions
0 Deny
. 0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
0 Re'commend Approval with Conditions
0 Recommend Denial.
I8J Categorically Exempt
0 Negative Declaration
15162, SubsequentEIR
0 Mitigated NegativeD.eclaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R:ID P\2003\O3-0723 Ovedand Retail Ccntc,ISTAFFREPORT.doc
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
MCA Architects
Completion Date:
December 19, 2003
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
August 15, 2004 (With Extension)
General Plan Designation:
Service Commercial (SC)
Zoning Designation:
Tem. Regional Center (SP 7)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Office
Vacant
Single-Family Res.lMulti-Family Res.
Restaurant
Lot Area:
Parcel 3 - .72 Acres/Parcel 4 - .58 Acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio
N/A per Specific Plan
Landscape Area/Coverage
14,237 sq. ft./25%
Parking Required/Provided
332 Spaces Required (Entire Center)/ 354 Provided (Entire
Center)
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
[S] 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
(or)
01.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
however, the following issues have not been resolved to the satisfaction to staff:
R,ID P\20031O3-0723 Ovedand Retail Cen",\STAFFREPORT,dne
.
.
.
.
.
.
[8J 2.
The, attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment A) has been completed and
staff has determined that the proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-
wide Design Guidelines, the Temecula Regional Center Specific Pian Specific Plan and
the Development Code.
(or)
02.
. . ,
The attached "Project Review Worksheet" (Attachment Á) has been compleÎedand
indicates that stat,t cannot make all the findings of consistency required forapproval.
ANALYSIS
In July of 2001, the Planning Commission approved a Development Plan for the Overland
Corporate Center complex. The approved site plan indicated that either a motel or restaurant
would be developed on this 1.3 acre pad. Instead of building one of those options, the applicants
are now proposing to develop two retail buildings totaling 13,350 square feet. Condition of
Approval No.7 of the Development 'Plan required that the Planning Commission review and
approve any changes to the approved building types. '
The project conforms with all applicable development standards including parking, landscaping
and setback requirements. Parking requirements were determined based on existing and future
uses throughout the entire Overland Corporate Center. The following analysis is provided:
Future and Existing Office Buildings At,B-1, C-1, D-1 & G1 - 56,000 Sq. Ft.
Building A & B Retail - 13,350 Sq. Ft.
Restaurant F1 - . 7,500 Sq. Ft.
The Regional 'Center Specific Plan requires 4 spacès/1,OOO SF Office and 5 spaces/1O00 SF
Retail & Restaurant. Based on the existing and future uses on site listed above, staff has
determined that 332 parking spaces are required to serve the entire center. A total of 354 spaces
will be provided. Should the future office use on Pad A-1 change, the proposed size or intensity
must conform to available onsite parking requirements. Reciprocal parking and access
easements have been established between adjacent parcels within the center.
À contemporary architecture has been utilized for the complex. Staff believes the retail buildings
are consistent with applicable provisions of the Temecula Re9ional Center Specific Plan and
City-Wide Design Guidelines. While the architectural style of the buildings do not match the
existing office buildings or the future ,restaurant, which has a separate style, staff believes the
buildings are compatible with existing development within the Center and serve as an attractive
addition to the complex.
Staff worked with the applicant to achieve a variety of project enhancements includin9 the
application of faux stone painting on the rotunda element, increased decorative column
projections along rear elevations and a more formalized outdoor courtyard to, include a water
feature. Staff has determined that overall, the project is consistent with the General Plan and
conforms with the City-Wide Design Guidelines and development standards specified in the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
R:ID P\2003\O3-0723 Ove,bnd Retail Cente"STAFFREPORT.d~c
01.
In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project has
been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review. (Class,
name, type)
.
(or)
[8J 1.
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved Regional Center Environmental Impact Report and is exempt from further
Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations).
CONCLUSION/RECOMMEN DATION
Staff has determined that the project is consistent with the General Plan and conforms with the
Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan and City-Wide Design Guidelines. Therefore, staff
recommends that the Planning Commission approve the proposed retail buildings subject to the
attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010F
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Temecula Regional Center
Specific Plan and with all applicable requirements of State law and other City ordinances.
.
The plan to develop two retaii buildings totaiing 13,350 square feet is consistent with the
Temecula Regionai Center Specific Plan and the City-Wide Design Guideiines.
Moreover, the proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape
designs, which wiil achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3,
'Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or
neighborhoods ".
The retail buildings comply with all appiicabie development standards of the Temecula
Regional Center Specific Plan and Development Code including off-street parking and
landscaping requirements.
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to
occupancy, City staff will inspect all construction. The site design will provide adequate
emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
.
ReID P\2003103-0723 Overland Rela;] CenterlSTAFFREPORT,doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue ~age 6 .
2.
Project Review Worksheet - Blue Page 7
PC Resolution No. 2004 - Blue Page 8
Exhibit A -.Conditions of Approval
3.
RID P\200JIOJ-O723 Ove<land Reta;] Center'STAFFREPORT,doc
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R:ID P\2003\03-0723 Ombnd Ret,i] CentcrISTAJ'FREPORTdoc
.
~I ¡.
ill
-----------
.
, '
i
!
~::
-~J
;r¡
¡1¡
¡
i
I
!
"
~~'
illl
K
ï
-t'.l1Iæ!Imr- ---+--
\ -
',,--
~-
--
;; ;
:11 \
¡ ¡
¡il; : !¡i ~"¡~¡
!¡¡ii !¡¡ !.:i
ji,; ¡ '¡II' ,¡¡¡
,,'" ,.
,j "
p:~ ,J~
,~ - ,,-,.¡
.;~ ! ,<' II'
~ ì ¡;¡ '-!i
~~. ;~i¥l;~
i "II ¡!! j!¡
-. - """" -,.
-I
I
\
I
~:/
~ II
Ii¡¡ ~
Is II
~
""
I
-. ¡.. -;;:.'-
¡¡¡¡Î;~!!~!~' ¡¡¡~¡¡
.
:¡;~
¡:!i.
¡¡¡ii,
I;;',!.
,'" ,¡,
¡- .
d
~
I
I!
! I!
¡, ,
! 'p
~_!. I,,:
.'. ..,
., ,
,
¡ ..
";;i
¡a,n!
!~
'I
I"
¡II
ili!
ifi¡
II"
;¡;,'
\"Jc '
-~=
~
~
@!
;r¡
~¡
<;:
z
~
~
¡¡;
.
II:
W
I-
Z
W
()
;
...I'
-,
ct!
I- :,
w!î
II: !I
c!
~¡
...I
II:
W
>
0
.
!
I;
!!
I,
,.
I!
II
'i
'!
I,
I!
..
I:
II
,I
,
0'
"'
~¡-
~m
.
-) ->'1
! 10111
111"1' .
; JI.I
II!;:¡
!lilL
,.I¡;i
0@ eee
.
.
\ '
\,-
"-
~~::
~H
I!:
W
I-
Z
W
()
~ ...II
,,-
go«
;;: 1-.,
"W!í
I!: I!
~cl'
gz
;;:0«' I
...I-
I!:
W
>
0
z
~
t
I.
i¡
¡.
¡¡
i¡
:,
I,
Ii
'I
h
¡:
II
!,
:!i
~
. ¡ l
! H!¡il!j!
¡Willl!I;!
1..;1 wl:t!
II
~ ' I
, I !
. ¡
!t ! !¡J
!
tJI 1 II 11
t' ~
<-~ Ii ~
¿= ¡¡,hi'
I,' .
I !~! !
e
¡ ~
i,~
r,1:
¡III,!
¡,Ii¡
--1'1 I
!i!;,
1m;, -- -.
0
I
i
I
1
cÞ
M
¡III
¡ill I
II e I
! ~';I ¡I I"
. ¡¡II !!,¡
I@!:!! ..!I!
I:!:;;. "I! !II m
¡Ii'
!Ii!!
I
l !
¡.
¡¡
!!
e
G
3C
~ð-
.
&
.
i
~
,~;
:~¡
a:
w
~
z
w
. 0
:.....!
0-1
~ce
..~.,
..w ¡
c a: ¡
cioi
°z~'
;Ice'
.....
a:
w
>
0
.
~
¡¡
I-
i1j
§
~
~
~
'"
:¡
~
..
z
~
~
~
.
I.
~I
I.
II
I,
:1
I.
Ii
,!
¡:
'I
!,
,
"
~j
;".
sj,:
m~
.
iI III
, , , , ,
iu II i!
00000000 00<i><i><i>
j
.
.
, ,J "I
C'.'-~"kJ," .,;
'~rêj!
, ;¡¡
t:;
3:
n! ! ,
" ,! "õ, ¡
I I': : ;! ¡ I
:~, II 'pi-! ¡ ¡
, " :ijl¡!! ¡ ¡n ~
¡i!illll'lllll
I
ô
~
ô
~
r-
~
~
g
~';
~~c
o.
I;;
~,
a:
w
~
z
w
0
"....,
g:cl
æ~',
..wj¡
, a:¡¡
~Q~
gz!
æc( .
....
a:
w
.>
0
,
"'
Ih
~I
~'
u,.
~~
.
~
i
a:
w
I-
Z
W
0
" ,
g::!j
;:~!,
"W!
ca:!¡
del
~Z¡
"et
...
a:
w
>
0
.
,
"
~¡
~¡i!
.
.
!¡hlii ' BJlllllio ~
~¡¡~:"" "",0
!~¡~ j ¡: ¡ in n
¡Ii,! ¡ ¡: ¡ ¡
,:¡I!~ 0(,\00 0E'00i!> Œ>
\< ¡"',> '¡ ,
~¡'iia~¡!,~ nl,'!
~ '¡I! ¡¡ili! ¡ H! ¡I
~ ¡~~!~¡~§n ,(n~ ¡
I" tI
n10
: :~""
'n! in
¡i
¡¡
"
0@I\)@@0@
1 ,
i-I §
dt,d
,\ I, ¡11 1: ~
¡~ j¡ ~.¡ ¡-
"" ,\1. ¡I '
,¡ ,,- I', ,"
'1"'" I"!'
l, '¡"! 'i) ¡! ~
;L!. ãh!¡ .
¡¡ ¡1l ,!!~ :!~
11.,: I,,! ¡"
II ¡~! ." ¡II ~
!',,' ¡Ii '"" .
!i !;1 ~;!! :¡î "
"!I!li ~!~~ ",.1 I
~"'n' §!!~i !¡~
¡ tg
¡ ~§~
. i5u~
¡ ~~~
¡ å~
~~N
:I g~g
,8 tJl°~
ê D ~
~ ii!
~
.9, :
, <-
:~s J.~r~ï¡ . j,¡ ..,1.1 t¡¡'; "
!:1~îí:¡:¡'ilJ¡¡ï¡!!¡,¡¡¡!;!¡¡ , ,
'¡¡'!"¡'t¡!'!"'hli';~lIlj'¡j ',',
¡"i!¡'!'ìIM¡IIII~;\!¡:¡!¡!h 111111111'11'
rH ¡¡in! Ii ml! WI!!!!!;! ~ï¡!! i ì I ìì ¡ i ~ if <
¡';¡!¡>,~¡'¡ìl¡¡~!"I'!.<¡ì;¡~h.ah~ ,
. .. ~-h" " t.'o 'I' > "';' U' , ~ .'
~i 1i!!I!1~!!¡Lì¡qi¡¡!!¡¡~'ì;ì¡ì*~ ¡'Ihi
~~ d ¡ ¡Hm I¡¡ il¡II,:! ¡h m¡ !¡¡¡mil!!!! ml,hIHhm
~~¡!:~¡~m~h~¡~h:¡¡:¡k;,!m¡,;~!m '
""'1 ,',. ',' > " 'I ,'C' P
¡IN'!!:;' .ì'~!¡' ¡,~'¡¡¡¡¡v¡¡."
i!ijl,h'!¡¡~'I¡:I¡,!!¡d!;¡ì¡,,¡I.¡¡~!.~
';. 1;¡¡"1¡1!;!~¡¡,ji,'!1~'!~'I!'¡'I'I~
I, l' I ,i 'I 'I ¡ , il .'. , ~ ".,I! ,,> ¡!I'jl ~ I
¡¡'lö~F ,.!,!~¡~~¡,\¡¡¡~¡¡!~¡¡j¡! :'h
!;'I¡¡I!I!:¡¡¡~'~':':'!¡':,>¡¡¡,'~¡¡,¡F.:,!W!~ìl
,¡ II I"~;, I !I t ,'!!!¡ ¡~ ¡ ¡ , ,;¡) 1.-\ :¡,¡¡i "Ii
~:(",'§~'¡¡¡¡!¡;i¡1¡!¡!ai'¡!:~¡!ì¡'I'¡¡!;..d.h
~ ',~. I,', "¡, I, ",1., '; 'I ~i ;1, I' ,¡¡i ill! ,,;:' ,,;!
~~:i>¡ ~H¡ !1~¡¡¡!¡ ¡¡Hi' ;;:¡,P,¡i¡l¡¡ ¡¡~i¡!¡I¡!:!!¡
'~¡¡~in¡¡¡f¡!ì!¡¡¡¡ !¡¡n¡!!!¡¡.¡¡¡;¡¡¡¡~!~~!!!m!~¡
~'¡, !~¡,~!'I!!:I!:'~¡:i':¡;~:!,,!;¡:H!¡;~¡,~!!m;,,!
! ¡J
i¡1!
,~!!j ,
mli
:.I,:[!,'I'
, 'I j
, )¡ ,
I I;
.
! ,!, i,ilt '
I ",'. ¡,~ 'Ii! ", ,
. t"" ""1' .
1¡ ,¡¡;Ii ¡~';'¡ ¡ ,
',oe,," ""'~ '
¡¡","".' j~I" I,
., "1"; ,!,;~, ."
.: ¡¡¡II! ¡¡Ii 11 ;¡ !
~¡ gmì i'l; Ii ¡f'
'¡~!'~1!> ¡¡I¡ ¡¡ ¡:ij¡
t.' !!i~~.¡¡ ; ¡.H;¡,!¡!~;
¡¡ ~m;¡¡ '¡i!¡ m.t; ~¡
""'U" 'I' "".'1 ~¡.
'I ~,;,¡, '", "'~I 'I
, """"".",
m!!!¡¡1!!¡I!_:ni¡'!¡n¡~PI¡,j¡¡;¡I¡n,'!!,¡
"'i'.'~¡~~',;!",¡!¡!¡'¡"\"!.I'i',¡~.:¡;,:.:i~,:'¡¡
'¡.. . u '" II.,' \ ,. ",," '" ,., ."-,"'" , t \.
¡;,"'~',t"";:'~¡'¡W'l'i",'!¡¡¡j',~"¡.~' ;.
,t¡" ,. " ,.' " !. ,¡! ..,' ,,: ;, ,.. "", ,'<~'¡ ¡ .n ,¡, ï
"'j¡¡';;"['¡;I.,'~'¡'¡;.t"'¡¡"'¡,d1'¡H.5!,e",,I' '~""'<'~
".n"""-"',\p,¡¡"¡,,,,;,"'¡¡¡¡I"'" """""'",.'í¡- Jill
¡~~,¡t;~.,¡¡e!F: ¡\f:'!:i;:i~ì¡¡ì~;',¡'!' ,""'",,' I ,',
¡:""ì"""'I;"""!"'~'¡i"'!'¡""'¡'¡nh> '\,'.' ,
;¡¡','~,¡¡!~¡¡~h~¡~ i: I,,'¡¡¡¡,¡;;¡ !I t~F!¡~h;,!,¡"I¡ ".)~, '
¡.,-:".., "'i'"", 'I" '" "',,' ;",,;,¡¡;, !' ¡V=, I
h",,'¡i~ì!;;U!'¡;!':I'~!,H¡:;¡¡¡,¡¡j'I¡;¡'i¡,I!j'¡ 'Ii',
~¡:!!~¡¡;'!';¡¡¡¡¡!¡'I:ìl¡:¡¡:¡,ii-¡¡i¡;:¡¡!'~lì'Ìi ...........~ ,¡I!
~~i¡ :¡,¡¡m!b,;ïìi ~,:¡Ì-:¡,n!:h¡¡¡¡,wm¡,.t:\t ,
¡ ¡1 ¡ I! mn n¡!,:¡ II! !!in !!! !i ,!II ~ m¡¡!!!!u ¡¡ 1,¡i¡ ,i 8 !¡~!!
1.1 '¡ II;" ¡ '1',1. '11 :..' .'1 ¡¡ ¡ ,¡, ,> ¡¡II I,:.¡ , ¡, '" ""! . ¡ ~¡ i. I
! ¡I .1 ¡.¡¡¡Ii!! ¡¡!!¡/ìIP¡¡¡nn.l¡ !¡¡Ijili! ¡li.'!!!!!I! !U!ï.ill!~~¡!¡¡~iI¡¡!¡'
,1: ¡ .;!,¡!¡!¡¡¡¡¡,¡ i!ï¡¡¡,n,¡¡t 'I¡i'!!" li;ì¡!':, !,.¡¡i¡j; ,
¡¡!!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ii¡¡¡!!!¡i¡¡i¡¡¡i!!!!!!I,;¡!UI¡¡¡¡!!¡¡¡¡¡i¡¡Piìm¡; ~~:I
I¡ ,." " ", 'I!" ,-il,J, i¡¡ I " ! ~'." ":,'" ii' 1'1; >"h' >,. 1\ .,!", < l' g ¥~ !
~¡~j¡,¡¡¡d¡!h,-¡¡¡!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡.,!!~'!¡¡i!;!!!d!¡~!ì!!¡¡¡¡¡;íi!¡¡!¡i¡'¡¡ì1!¡1ì!l:! ~ ~ h.
IJ:,,~,!':'!:'h:~~:¡'¡":¡1 "h:':;h:h::¡I:!!:¡!!:""u~,::!!¡¡¡~¡¡¡!¡ Ie!!
.
"','M--',i':'-==
;.;"
, !~;¡¡
=.~--~-----~-'-'-'::~~~~j~:~,_f!~~.-
'-"""'-'--'-'-.' , ,-,-,-,- "'" I, .~
ì! 1 ¡ :Ú~ _II I!
\ . ~ ã \ 'I
' " . ~j
'~ ' , . :::If, , >-=~-'è---:'=1-(1'-
j'
.~
-,
.-~~
~:
¡~!!,I t~ \,
'U"'IL -,"
I = ~\
,
/1,
I" '"
.j ¡ ~,
~ " i ~.
. . ,
~,
! !
ã \
,
C~~
!i ¡
" ~
, '
~,
.~
"¡
~ R "
./~ ê¡
¡~~ ~;
'II
t,
-~ ,
~* g ~ij : !
,;¡ . à ,. ,
~ ð ¡ ¡
~a¡!
~V'
I
!m
1m
['~) ¡~¡
~ *i ¡~!¡
" ~tl¡ rl--I. . \. '¡¡~
pt ~ "-
Uf::~\¡
;j \
;"'" ¡ ,~.
" (",~,
'P' '" ~~
,I ~ ,~¡:
'; ,: ~"!
¡ ': C"':
'! ¡:
; \
,
¡¡ c.
.~\!
~ì
~I
';~~
'I í ~¡¿¡¡
i¡ ¡ ~~:
1'0 , o~z
I" ¡ ~g"
Ii! ¡ ~~~
,~¡¡ . ~:::¡:;
d ~ ¡~~ti
Iii ~ h~~
. : ¡~
!=-
"
.
'I \ ¡
¡ 'J
,1.11 ;
! ~
" ,
I: i i j " I.
! í I
' ¡
, ¡~
. ,..
!,
¡(l)
¡
.
-~'}--=
-,-----.J.',- .
'---~----,-r.~,;...-;;~ U~U~~-~"',,
, ' ,I "
, \
¡ . " , ' ¡i
", -~.' . '. '. ~j
" "-~---- ------1;!
Vm.
.
0
. I
:1
,
, ,
'~-;
¡:
! .1 ¡
1\
II
. ~1m.
I
.,
,
.I
"
I
1..-
'!'
I
,
,
.
"'.'--0
Ao'
. '
to "
,~~ g.:¡ ¡ I
ii = 7. ¡ ,
~ ð ¡ I
~ap
:§ '<::'"
.
'F ~; 1
- Xê:3
¡ ~z~
¡ ~t!n
,;1;
\í1~:;:
:s ;~,,:
. a ri3¡¡'tJ
~ ¡~ß'~
is !æ
/::
õ
" ,
j,
¡ !
" ,I, ,
" I¡ ¡
: ¡.[!
~ 'A'
d 'I
'. ¡ P
H
0'-::'.
' ,j
j' ':'
~~ I
~g.
'.~
'.~
~~,
~"~
.~.
~~~
:;¡f
~ g~i
~¡§~ .
,0$ - 'I', !
:¡
~ .
J I
~ ,
~~ õ §! , .
.!! >ij!'
l" . ,
aq
~ 1(:;11
---
~ ¡ .;- .
,
d~~
~~g
; ~~>
¡ ~I~
5 ~ ~~:
~ ¡~~w
g ¡~~~
~ I~
.
u
. J
'I'~ .
Ii! i
, ¡I ~
i! ~
,! ,
i
iÌ I I
¡I"
'"
I',
.
~
¡œ
.
.
.
..
. ,
,.,.".~t. =
~.
. ~
. ""
¡ ¡¡ ¡¡ ~!
r '<.
I~í~!
-.--;-
t", ~
",-~!
,Ig¡¡' -,
'" "
~ ¡ en 1
§
s
.;:~~
i ~§~
¡ ;;~g
¡ . ~g"
¡ ~~~
!~~;:
~ '::;~EI
~ ¡bi~~
" '"
~ Ii¡!
~
" ,
!
!~ III
~~oo
I ¡
'II ¡,'
lii- -I
¡¡.I ¡.
!'" !
!¡¡'I!!
:11: Iii
~ ¡¡¡!Hi!
--_.~~--=.._-=-_.- do"
--'Q'~~M ;; õ,'
'=~~= di~~~:~
0'
;H,
;I~
¡,¡
im
~
~
æ
ß
Ii
¡;
¡:/i:d, ~, ~
\ð I. ¡
.I
..,
jH
~ ¡
à . ¡
ð i I
Ii'!"!
"
!
¡¡ ¡
.. : I
" ,
! '
,1. !!I!!ì ! ~
¡ 'ii ¡¡¡¡¡: ¡
i ,. 0 "",' . ~
'Ii """ , ¡
i ," - - ...- . "
~z
~<1;
~-'
0.
CJ
Z
'~
<1;'
-'
0.,
>-'
~I
~i'
w,
'g: I .
!"
¡
¡
i
i
i
¡
¡
I
"
¡
!
¡
,
,
I
¡
i
!
I
I
¡ ,
i
!
r
,
¡
¡
.
.
.
.
I
i J,.r,
!:::=. ;"'-
i":'.'.' ,'.C>
I .
l,.....,...,..", ~
,e' -_J
-, =:>
," -,
C=..
.
Iddl! ¡ I!
¡Ihun Ii I, i ¡
,I¡¡¡II¡!¡!! II I II
¿¡/mi u! ¡I ¡ Ii
<0 <0 OO<ê>
.
"'t).!!
O'!f!!
~~!!!
1'-
. ~
. ~
: §
a:
w
I-
Z
11.10
'" o~
~ ....~
9 <~
'5 I-~ð
: w~s
« a:~~
'-' ~~
z QO~
9 zt
'5 cr:~
'" ....8
a:~
w
>
0
§
~;
g~
~~-
~,!¡¡
~I!~
~,~[
.
.
.
,
"'.~':
r{
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
RolD 1'\2003103-0723 Ovcrbnd R,"il Ccntc,ISTAFFREI'ORTdoc
.
.
.
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Commercial
Planning Application Number:
fA' O"J- 072.??
5e.i"v'ìr e CðmmrfC.i",\ (sc) Consistent?
1. General Plan Designation:
'Ie'?
2. Zoning Designation:
T~(7').¡2¡f>3' l'rrlu- ~P-'1
Consistent?
YpC;
3. Environmental Documents Referred to in Making Determination:
IðJ
18],
~
~
gJ'
ø
.~
ð1
D
D
General Plan EIR
Sensitive BiologicalHabitat Map
Sensitive Archeological Area Map
Sensitive Paleontological Area Map
Fault Hazard Zone Map
Subsidence/Liquefaction Hazard Map
100 Year Flood Map
Future Roadway Noise Contour Map
Other (Specify) ,
Previous EIRlN.D. (Specify Project Name & Approval Date):
. \e.~c.v\rdZ<'3;^""'\ rpr#""'-<;V~r;{.;c. "fIr"., E.::!:JZ')c¡'-hl:>~"'1I Iqq4-
, . I '.)
D
D
Submitted Technical Studies (Specify Name, Author & Date): .
Other:
Rr Exempt
D Mitigated Negative Declaration
D Negative Declara'tion .
D EIR
4. Environmental Determination:
ø 10 Day Review
D 20 Day Review
D 30 Day Review
5. General Plan Goals Consistency:
Consistent
0'
ø
ø
Inconsistent
D
0
D
'Land Use
Circulation
Housing
R:IFORMSIST AFF REPORTSIPROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET,commmia1.dot
, I
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Commercial
Consistent
Inconsistent
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
OSIConservation
Growth Management/Public Facilities
Public Safety
Noise
Air Quality
Community Design
Economic Development
.
ø
0
I?š.'I
~
~
~
~
6. City-wide Design Guideline Consistency:
0
Site Planninq:
0
A. How does the placement of building(s) consider the surrounding area
character?T""-r"-aic¿.r 5i+c-c.00'\' í'15 of 0- ';J,.-D<:\cdú>m~Pt\dw,+J...j" tk ~"i7h'J Dve.l""ð
Cos. ('.'!"\"tb~ýCo"'fk;<. n<.. Jik- j ~ to""<.,.-~ -H<-a:qJ"c"".r5tnd5: 1h<.bvjlðj~~p ¡,.""vm-
- M<."t-
5Wo:.\--.ç.,""~'\~>' '"'" "'vi',).;"" ~ .<"'-'M""T-í":'.~'\ ,~""\-, ..,il-" '"7:jvif"<'~ ÞOuí\di '"'~ """"-' ¡""""'\Pi 'ì
.~. '" """I"." <l.a">"o....c.y,,~\-c.-""0~<:.""h"'\,",,1'" ~<. ~...-o , "',P..~" ¡q,,{¡,
B. How do the siructure~ Interface with adjoining properties to avol ~ng '-'i~~'Î"¡,J"""
nuisances and hazards? r.~,^>~~""
í..... 5""",<.. ç.<>(.;\'-H<:~-NY -\-I--.<:.'ovil';¡;~ 1",=.",=" \o","~ò ..-\--tk.-<-~D¡:'<.~rv.í\ò¡" ~. ,~
~"-""""Ò"'" ~"<)^ ."n.lv,,",! r 1\'" .<.IIs,!,""" ,~I.Ý. ""'."'~)r"""~"r-'" J).h
INI'\)'..,' T"..-\'..c.;\;f-;c> ..i\\ ~ il">j",,* o.J..J"-O:I1"I- VS<:,!",,<1 C;n-vl..-\-.ò" C"-'*\jt.-15 1-.".... b.,-:n, ,
C. How does the building placement allow buildings rather than parking lots ......'.~.
to define the street edge?
ì~<. \?vilð;~> \-..~,,'-- 1;¡<:.",--",~¡-ItJ ,'"TD-t-\"o:.[..V....<..r &f -»-"51"'£' l1-,;s "II"", \'»v +-\."" 50,*" ~
1~ ;i~\~=~t:.1-~~~~,t;t<'\:;:;::-\--f ~~:~~)<;::J;:~\- ~:~t;:~s~.
<.or\-',o"\7 o-ð.>o,CV"r;... ~L."L ',,!O ,- J\ 'w
Parklnq anq ClrCUla!lOn: 7ITec.,~ "" <..- ~J"'<V ""', v, J ~"',.-<£\s '
A. How does the parking lot design allow customers and deliveries to reach
the site, circulate through the parking lot, and exit the site easily?..
"'< f"vW"'J lot- ì,. d.e5;""'ooð "" ocw iJ'-;().. c,'(",-",~, -þ"offt"v r~: \ \-,'\>0.1"""> ",.}u.:;)) >
"" ""--'r< /. ý'""",","") ~f'c .~:; h-O- .r' I,., A,~U"\>- J,,«ù-i o~~"-1\o,,:....) P"'f Dcrp>.5i"'\'+-j ,,~
~"""~""\^j"""" ."'~i-\-1::.. \O"ð¡n5 ~ f~=-""\'"", -to,.- G.oI~"'I.v~ <I.J,VeV') """"".\<- "^"~""5 .
B. How does the parking lot design provide safe and convenient access to
pedestrians and bicy.clist~? l",,~ f"....lLi",~ 1 ot Î>VI, \-o"""""':Il<.l"'l~c.eM rr.J....,\-v\~) "-/;\\."1 Ì<.It...
'n c...,..~ >'> n..o -r......1<..i ,,\ ~,~'<:} 'I-e e~e..r ..-..,1""-, ßi<'jc.J...,..tJG¡ wi" ¡¿,o.yYb,,"' i:kd eo..-t- ~
Þ";"';"") . "'r--<--¡ o.~'"
0
C. How are the service facilities within the parking lot screened or buffered
from public view? ':> <::vv,~c. To-c.II,')ic> .ç.,.,.. 'r},.. I.~i\ð.i ""'~'> vù-, 0.> t\..,.." I....!;^,.s:t~..ce
"""do ~"'~\.-~"I-.\,>,,~ç sh.." \1"s<v~""oð ~'" -ðJ..te",.,..s+,.-t"""~<;;II"", J-I,...,,;;{,'\f,...
~(t><\<'5 ""ð f'<"f'~ l~r'r"^J .J
Buildinq Architecture:
A. How does the building design provide articulation of the building mass?
1\1c, a<::"Ì5~ ~.f ~', þ.¡¡..\¡"y nrL.'IW~ """~"!...'\""': '¡"¡""""'jl, of~ \ -:' ~"'~
hc.\j~"í c:¡ S'5",f'c""'rS"-f",,Y'ø.)-iðV\ b~~=.... v;vlld",)\ ",,~c.""('<:"~"',5 VD'\V"&":'
t!.ú.\- ..ð.)5 'ou;\cI:,,~ o..YJ'jb Gi~J ¡'ro)'Kb G,k:1.ve..-1-h.... \;N;~ì"'jr.v~fIck.J", rv¡r~, v
\:>~---' ~ y".,ç.';...e. Nu",~"> c>-I+-~«o v ' I .
R,IFORMSISTAFF REPORTSIPROJEfT REVIEW WORKSHEET.,omm",i,l.dot ~ 'v¡.. ~ ~f{ov\ ed o-ltI"'í <:.-\"v.... ~l>YLÇ,
Tw\)....ç,.-\- w; ,) {'. c..,,\,,~r.:> 2praù'(.\:-or;;-f- 1-+.(.. rt:<V of +1-,... ÞviI,J,,")5' 0..\. '4 .... I~
Ç().¥I"fie.> -\-t, <t.I""'ì't- o.ý'-\-.\c,\)\o..\\on.
.
.
.
D
PROJECT"REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Commercial
B. How is each building "stylistically" consistent.with all buildings in a
complex, and on áli ,elevations to achieve design harmony and continuity
within itself?
No-,p..~jfì(..""'<.l--.,~("..\ ~""~,ý~'~,,, ..,>v~v;'..d-.'¡'" o..Hød...tí.....",;H-\-\...... ,
- \ " ~. ,. C~YI.......",
c.,-l;>""~,~, G.~k)<. ït.<:.. "'vÎ\.\;"ì.:ð;o.:>...~.10""~J\";"\"'Y~~5",j~ Jr\,.~,-
C,"tJOWdb~~ pYà'è),lrr;~t 'à'tUilðtrf9~fe ~"rï\ctr~~tITñ'biön§'1 ~û~è'ruï "'((lloJ . ~~;......
open space between the buildings and/or the street?' " ' \ . -, \
'1\,<..-\vJo,""";\.\\"'S$' h..v.. ~~ \-<>, "clo<.;":<..",~,,,j..;~<>.'r\-v'..<.-t;ý~."""ððr'\<1z.o..
" Co o',,~
f'lo,2:ø- '7c-NCo) \<>~<.........\,-z.e..~ ¡¡>\c-.: ... o."ð-.p,r.".ð.<--' . ~'J'
D. How do each of the architectural elements (building base, windows,
doors ~nd openings, cornice and parapet, roofline, arid finish materials
meet tt)e intent of the desi!)n guidelines? A .ç.",.,c: SN~ 17...;" \-,~'...,> \, I..J; \I k o,ff1;.a ~ ~<
Ir'o\vnð....,:k.........\-,~v...v,ø"s""'}"'r\~"\v~ <1-\°'" 1\.....:ç...""\-<.~'\"'(),,!>. W;",'\""'3""'a.~
n~."I?">~ \"~~L"""'~ y~"",,~..ç..Ý'ì""'- "". ~..~¡:"'~_.$d_:\' ~..."..y;.;¡>...~-.-~
S-\-Ylb-t"""'\\)' co"'>;>~~'-'\'r'h ""'... ""'=-Y'IL\\ à~>,--,'i'- ~~L' ß,,¡\J,..., "'..'rev~"\s~,.J. ~D\V¿S
LandSCapinq:o-;~ ':"~"".o'" 0>0,';> ().",,} V....,i'Ct) I--. f'Y.".J,... ì"+<"ot.~T: Cø.Y'\of',¡j c..n.-R'.s¡....' ~ &'
0'-'~""'5' . I '/' Go.
A. Does the plan provide the following ratio of plantings?
)8r Yes D No, why?
Trees
10% 36" Box
30% 24" Box
60% 15 Gallon
Shrubs
100% 5 Gallon
Groundcover
100% Coverage
In One Year
B. Does the liomdscaped area, ratio, spacing, and size conform with the
design guidelines? ~Yes D No .
C: How does the internal site landscaping frame the building(s) and
separate them from the surrounding p<;!ve,ments? ~ð,<.C\~c. r"""'¡-C>"> ....".... \:0..",.... f'1>V(qeJ
\7-.:.\y......", \-\"-t. ,:",-,0 =--.1..:0 OT +\.-;"'- \0", lð, ",,> 0".,J +-\.-., "é.l5...<.1:ht- tI~ v)c¡ n) "~,, y
-¡9ot.\t...~ o'f ) "rd>=-f "'j k",v,,- .¡"o ",=",-y,....,'J.,,) <40 "'.5 -tJ,,'C. '¡;".",¡- ~\<"'.},'o_j -h, -, ,
s.,1+;,.. +",,"<::"""<M-io,,~ """ð. ,I?û>-Jið..e. ì('\~ý~~\-. (j'~<,.pY"";~"\.."Ù)<!'..t"Ï";"'-\~o C>""v>~,tL,"...
D. How does the patio anä slreer furniture, flxlures..walls and fences Imegrate,_"~ """.. '--'
~oý<.."Y'7""
with of the arçhitecture and landscáping? 4?[aZ~ ~v,.;"¡,,,.rt..St-¡lcs \).vc ""Y" :t,¡'I.:......ì~#',,-
Io";~;"") ~\:=\vo(...... \'>-c-, à.<,<.oYO,"""'.~'" "..i ().,.d r"'¡"", +r.. c....'r V,v( 1t>Co""'f\!_.
.J,\ð,;~j~ e. f'1~~"""'\\>à.c,>\'j'" \""c~h)"""\-,",;'r\- ~~.'^~~v\...).s 0"'"
7. Development Code Consistency: . ~I:),"ð'
A. "How does the plan achieve the 'performance standards specified in Code
Section 17.08.070? .
R,IFORMS'ST AFF REPORTSIPROJECT REVJEW WORKSHEETcommeroi,l.dot '
3 '
Net Lot Area:
Total Floor Area:
Floor Area Ratio:
Lot Coverage:
PROJECT REVIEW WORKSHEET
Development Plan
Commercial
.
~
Circulation:
TI-.~(>v-C»c<.-'r- ~;;"'Î~ s...y~ b-¡ Co-~"n o.c.C~5S -ro, m> t-\..o.ro.Y-c:."~ "'i ð+-\.eV
Go""",:"",<-",,' a,y, <) C I+í= '-'le;I oN ;\-1.;"'- 'H.-... t""\-c.v~ \\", I, "Iko\-- \-\...e. o...¡.,'k
f"'r~t' ^t" o..l'Ò\"-~ ,,-v~~"r"-v-o.~ 'i'-""" """';" t.i I'",-",\...l--ìo..., {".,,~s.+-i...,..vO; h.v~ Y>....
Arcm ee:Dra eslqn: Jt..,~.
~~~¡~ ""'u~> ~ "'"\)e...-\"'~,,,,- "'='" 0."., ð «I-\-1...va~~h -4.<.-\)\<:- <>'i'v-¡ì...-, r".,,"hti'jl.\-5
INo...\\ ø-tY'>~ o.-..ò, ?<.'J'u.\iD"'~ .-n....... '<>oè).'{ of +-\"""-\-""0 ÞU\\ ð~""J~ 4",,-- ""00' J> Y1I\c..o"';f"
wi\-\... ..,.o'N~ )r,.¡,..... ~ ' "', .
Site rfanmnq and~sian: .¡...... "1'1'o",à~" ~':>",~,co." 'r-t.~" "of-"'.,,'F"""'- 0" 60
"- -Hon'<- "'~ 'f<ß.V ~)<::"""'-ì-\ 0..5 .
Lo(.dì;V\~Jì..,;\i""",h.,,'r ¡"",<::"\"".k,,}.\n'\\"..,,,;,ì~ of- \\;,y ...."~\.\;"],,,,,,';...,...,.s,-,=....à-f.-<>\M
"-ð.j",c...-. . ""r~<>-'i'T,~¡"".""",i'.);"":J>."""~\n,,-,,, ~,,-<.'r-<::.!I\t;o. ~YON~."~""'"
'è'ótno.~"¡jlt <:o,¡~~<>;o..)á,«.bý'¡"¡ve..",~"""'-ÞI,.Jve.,v"',<'"",> ~\-'vVPÞ"V-¡:~~"""'~f"M~
' c.-v""',:,ð> """-~ """ lð.í~'1-' '" s.~ ""'<'>1>- I.,..--.l..-"f"'~ .:.\""",,'r>o,^> '
~"- ~
""":>v+- y"""",d"",,'" \)~"-,>. ""<., J.~~",.t ""-.... ~í""'...', CQ",\",""ì-\,,- ",;'>4-, ,,:"í~,,'j &,>"'1;,,,,> rR
Does the application and submitted plans on file conform with all of the ~ (..~"-
applicable minimum development standards?
B.
N Yes, with conditions
D No
f",...rd ~ - .1;;1.. A(,,~<,/f"<1:d 4-. ')ß
(I",\w'iA- Co 4-M/ C. '61()
N/f't fd ')~~:ç;<.~
w/Pr ~ ~k.dÇt, rl..r-...
, I
(k".s
.
Arch./Paleo
Fault Zone
Flood
Noise
North
East
West
South
Habitat
Subs./Liqfctn
Stream/Creek
Air Quality
! .
.
R:\FORMSISTAFF REPORTSIPROJECT REVIEW WORKSIIEET,comme<ci,l.dot
4
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 3
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
R:II) P\2003103-{)723 Ovcrbnd Rctoil CcnlcrlST AFFREPORT.doc
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION' OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING AP~LlCATION
NO, PA03-0723, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT,
ESTABLISH AND OPERATE TWO SINGLE-STORY RETAIL
BUILDINGS TOTALING 13,350 SQUARE FEET ON 1.3 ACRES.
THE SITE IS, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF OVERLAND DRIVE AND MARGARITA KNOWN
AS ASSESSORS PARCEL ~OS. 921-810-021 & 029/921-830-
030, ' .
WHEREAS, STDR Architects filed Planning Application No. PA03-0723, a Development
Plan Application, in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on August 4, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
, WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the téstimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based.
upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1.
by reference.
The above recitations are true and correct and are hereby'incorporated
Section 2, Findinqs, The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F' of the Temecula Municipal
C~~ '
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan, Temecula Regional
Specific Plan and with all applicable requirements of state law and other City ordinances.
The plan, to develop two retail buildings totaling 13,350 square feet is consistent with the
Temecula Regional Center 'Specific Plan and the City-Wide Design Guidelines.
Moreover, the proposed plan, as conditioned, incorporates architectural and landscape
designs, which will achieve the City's General Plan Community Design Goal #3,
"Preservation and enhancement of the positive qualities of individual districts or
neighborhoods ".
R,ID 1'\2003\03-0723 Overbnd Reta;) CentertPC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
I
The retail buildings comply with all applicable development standards of the Temecula
Regional Center and Development Code including off-street parking and landscaping
requirements
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
The project has been conditioned to conform to the Uniform Building Code, and prior to
occupancy, City staff will inspect all construction. The site design will provide adequate
emergency access in the case of a need for emergency response to the site.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. A Notice of Exemption for Planning
Application No. PA04-0723 was made per the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines
Section 15162. This section applies when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been
certified or negative declaration adopted for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for
that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR.
Section 4. Conditions. That the City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
conditionally approves the Application, a request to develop two single-story retail buildings
totaling 13,350 square feet set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by
this reference together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning
Commission this 4" day of August 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
RolD 1"12003103-0723 O"dand Retail CentenPC RESDLUTION AND COA,doc
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 4'h day of August 2004, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
. PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R,ID 1'\2003\03-0723 O",iand Retail CcntetIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
" , 3
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
R,ID 1'12003\03.0723 Dvcd"nd Rem;! Cent"lPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No, PA03-0723
, Project I;>escription:
A Development Plan to construct, establish and
operate two single-story retail buildings totaling 13,350
square feet on 1.3 acres, The site is generally located
on the northwest corner of Overland Drive and
. Margarita,
DIF Category:
TUMF Category:
Retail Commercial
Commercial
AssE)ssor Parcel No.:
921-810-021 & 029/921-830-030
Approval Date:
August 4, 2004
Expiration Date:
August 4, 2006 ,
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order
made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Six1y-Four Dollars ($64.00) for the
. County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided
. under 'Public Resources Cç:>de Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations
Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant has not delivered
to the Community Development Department - Planning Division the check as required
above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition
(Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2.
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, defend with counsel of City's own election, and
hold harmless, the City and any agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its
officers, employees, and agents from any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against
the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and
agents, to attack, set aside, void: annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an
approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal
board or legislative body including actions approved by the. voters of the City, concerning
the Planning Application which action is brought within the appropriate statute of
limitations period and Public Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et '
seq., including but not by the way of limitations Section 21152 and 21167). The City
R:ID 1'\2003\03-0723 O"dand Retan CenterIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doe
5
shall promptly notify the permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought
forth within this time period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action
and applicant shall deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional
deposits to cover anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused
portions of the deposit once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to
either promptly notify or cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be
responsible to indemnify, defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, or agents.
3.
This approval shall be used by the Expiration Date noted above; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or
the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval.
4.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "D"
(Site Plan), contained on file with the Planning Department Additionally, the following
criteria must be met prior to development of the project:
a. All ground mounted utility/mechanical equipment shall be located such that they
are not placed in prominent locations visible to the public.
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans
and electrical plans for verification of acceptable placement of the transformer
and the double detector check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
In accordance with the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan, the double
detector check assembly shall be installed underground.
b.
c.
5.
Any outside wall-mounted lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All parking lot lights and other
exterior lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety for plan check approval and shall comply with the requirements of
Riverside County Ordinance No. 655. Wall pack style light fix1ures shall not be utilized.
6.
Parking lot lights shall be consistent with the standards used throughout the mall which
include a dark bronze round tapered pole with a mounded height of twenty to thirty-five
(20-35) feet.
7.
Building elevations shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "E" (Building
Elevations), contained on file with the Planning Department. All mechanical and roof-
mounted equipment shall be hidden by building elements that were designed for that
purpose as an integral part of the building. When determined to be necessary by the
Director of Planning, the parapet will be raised to provide for this screening.
a. Landscaping shall substantially conform to the approved Exhibit "F" (Landscape
Plan). Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to
the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Planning. If it is determined that the
landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Planning shall have the
authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance
with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped
areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest.
R,1l) 1'\2003\03-0723 Omland Retail CentelIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
6
.
.
.
.
.
.
8.
9.
10.
The colors and materials for this project shall substantially conform to the following list of
approved colors and materials and with the Color and Material Board còntained on file
with the Community Development Department - Planning Division, Any deviation from
the approved colors and materials shall require approval'of the Director of Planning.
Material
Field Color:
Color
Fr.azee "Burma Buff" 8201W
" Frazee "Tobacco Road" 8214M
Frazee "Spanish Gold" 7745D
Frazee "Brass Bucket" 8205D
Frazee "Autumn Wheaf' 8225D
Accent Color:
Accent Color:
Accent Color:
Cornice Color
Rotunda Veneer: Limes~one Plaster wI Natural Veining, to Match Adjacent Buildings
Aluminum Storefront: Frazee "Elm Courf' 8595D
Glass:
Exterior Lighting:
Metal C~nopies:
W Unco8;ted Vera!ux Green 2000 by Visteon
D.M. Lighting Model # 4920 & Stanza Model # 5301
. ,
Chemtal Brushed Stainless # 710
The constructiòn plans shall indicate the application óf painted rooftop add~essing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The
numerals shall' be painted with a siaridard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent. yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The addresses(s) shall be oriented to. the
street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
The applicant shall comply with ~II miiigation measures contained in the approved
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan.
Prior to the Issuance of Grading Permits
11.
12.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided. by the Community Development Department - Planning Division staff; and
return one signed set to the Community Development Department - Planning Division for
their files. ' . .
The applicant shall submit to the Community Development Department - Planning
Division for permanent filing two. (2) 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the
approved Color and Materials Board and of the colored version of approved Exhibit "E",
the colored architectural êlevations to the Community Development Department -
Planning Division for their files. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on' the photographic prints.
.Prior to the Issuance of Building Permits.
13:
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by.the Community DevE!lopment Department - Planning Division. These plans
shall conform substantially with the ?lPproved Exhibit "H1" and "H2," or as amended by
these conditions. The location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants
R:\D P\200310J-O723 Ovedand Retail Ccnte<\PC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
7
shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The
plans shall be accompanied by the following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
b.
c.
d.
Prior to the Issuance of Occupancy Permits
14.
15.
16.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Community
Development Department - Planning Division for one year from final certificate of
'occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been
maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be
released.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
17.
18.
19.
20.
A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
The Developer shall construct public improvements in conformance with applicable City
Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works.
a.
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalk, storm drain
facilities and sewer and domestic water systems
R,\D 1'12003\03.0723 O"dand Retail Cen<enPC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
8
.
.
.
.
Prior to Issuance of.a Grading Permit
21.
22.
23.
24.
.
25.
26.
29.
.
A 'Grading Plan shail be prepared by a registered .Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property. ' "
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conforman'ce with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
. , )
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections. '
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
'and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this'runoff.' The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer. '
The Developer must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No
grading shall be permitted until an NPDES Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed or the
project is shown to be exempt.
27.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a.' Planning Departm'ent
b. Department of Public Works
c.. Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
The Developer shall comply with all constraints, which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property. .
28.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work periormed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works. '
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid, The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid"
-",
;,
R,ID 1'12003\03-0723 Ovedand Reta;! Cente"rc RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
9
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C.
paving.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
36.
37.
38.
.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b.
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
c.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
39.
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
40.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
.
R,\D 1'\2003\03-0723 Omland Reta;! Cenle<\PC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
10
.
41,
42.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
48.
. 49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
55.
56.
57.
.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor, lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and directed so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees. '
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior t<;> submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable 'disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April
1, 1998)
Provide disabled <:,ccess from the public way to the main entrance of the building:
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems. .
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29. .
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
Provide precise grading plàn' at plan check submittal to 'che'ck accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction. .
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks. .
Signage shall be.posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
R.ID Pl2003103-0723 Qmland Retail CcntcrIPC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
II'
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
58.
59.
60.
61.
62.
63.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1125 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 850 GPM
for a total fire flow of 1975 GPM with a 2 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and
adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each intersection
and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or Fire
Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B)
.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 2 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access
roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 450 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or
Fire Department access road(s) frontage to an hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required, (CFC 903.2)
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any
cul-de-sac shall be forty-five (45) feet. (CFC 902.2.2.2.3 and Subdivision Ord
16.03.020)
.
RolD 1'\2003\03-0723 Ovcdand Retail Ccnle<\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
12
.
64.
65.
69.
. 70.
71.
.
If construction is phased,each phase, shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction, (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to 'building co'nstruction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed.. Temporàry Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) ,
66.
Prior to building final, all loc.ations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an ex1erior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather suriace designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902) .
67,
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) "
The gradient for a fire apparatus access roads shall 'not exceed fifteen (15) percent.
. (CFC 902.2.2.6 Ord. 99-14),
68.
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather suriace roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau.' (CFC 902.2.1)
72.
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; a.nd conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Pre",ention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appròpriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance òf. a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
73.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors.' Singlefamily
residences and multi-family residential units shall have-four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
R,\D 1'\2003103-0723 Omland Retail Cent"IPC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
13
74.
75.
76.
77.
78.
79.
80.
81.
82.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a directory display
monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile
home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the
complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit
numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design
specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior
to installation.
.
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the main entrance door. (CFC 902.4)
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
.
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate lane
painting and or signs.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, building final or occupancy, buildings
housing high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions of Uniform Fire
Code Article 81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. The
storage of high-piled combustible stock may require structural design considerations or
modifications to the building. Fire protection and life safety features may include some
or all of the following: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific
commodity class and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents,
draft curtains, Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. (CFC
Article 81)
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
.
R,ID 1'\2003\03-0723 Omland Reta;l Cent"IPC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
14
.
.
.
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other'
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau,(CFC 7901.3 and 8001,3)' ,
Special Conditions
83.
, Prior to issuance of building permits, fuel modification ,plans shall be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval for all open space areas adjacent to the
wildland-vegetation interlace. (CFC Appendix II-A)
84.
Prior to issuance of building permits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones, (CFC Appendix II-A) ,
85.
, ,
Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted
and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire
and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
86.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupanèy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval. '
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permi¡ process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
87.
88.
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored on site increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports, (CFC Appendix II-E)
COMMUNITY SERVICES DEPARTMENT
General Conditions
92.
89.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
90.
The Applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
91.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul constructio'n debris.
All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
property owner or maintenance association.
R:\D 1"12003103-0723 Ombnd Rein;) Ccntcr\PC RESOLUTION AND COA,doc
IS
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
93.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R:ID "\2003\03-0723 Omland Re ¡¡jl Ccnte<\PC RESOLUTION AND COA.doc
16
.
.
.
.'
.
ITEM #11
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
File Number
, STAFF REPORT - ~LANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
'August 4,2004
Emery J. Papp, AICP
Title:
Senior Planner
PA04-0384
Application Type:
Zone Change (Text Only)
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CECA:
(Check One)
Revise the Schedule of Permitted Uses for the Temecula Creek Village
Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4) to permit the sale of .
alcohol and permit blueprint and copy services in the Village
Commercial area; and correct inconsistencies in footnote text for PDO~
4 located on the south side of Highway 79 South between Jedediah
Smith Road and Avenida De Mission~s .
0 Äpprovè with Conditions
0 Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
I8J Recommend City Council App~oval
0 Recommend Denial
. I8J Exempt
(Section) 15162
0 Negative Declaration
0 'Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
, , ' . . '
DEIR
R:IP D 0\2004\04.0384 Tcrnccula Creek Village (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08.(J4-O4,dot
1
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Temecula Creek Village, LLC - David J. Esoldi
Completion Date:
June 02, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
N/A
General Plan Designation:
Professional Office
Zoning Designation:
PDO-4
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Multi-Family Housing and Commercial buildings under construction
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant (Rancho Community Church)
Open Space (Temecula Creek)
Vacant
Vacant (Creekside Plaza)
Lot Area:
5 Acres
Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A
Landscape Area/Coverage N/A
Parking Required/Provided N/A
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
¡g] 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
RW D 0\2004\04-0384 Tome,"b C""k ViJbge (PDO-4)IPC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04 do<
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
ANAL YSIS
On November 28, 2000 the City Council approved the Temecula Creek Village Planned
Development Overlay District Number 4 (PDO-4). Since this approval, the property regulated by
PDO-4', has changed ownership several times. The project is currently under construction,
including all of the buildings in'the Village Commercial area. The owner has had inquiries from
several potential tenants concerning the sale of alcohol in the Village area..
The applicanVowner has been told by staff that as currently written, the PD~ will cqnditionally
permit sale the sale of alcoholic beverages in the Retail/Support Commercial area only, located
at the south east corner of Highway 79 South and Jedediah Smith Road. The sale of alcohol is
not currently permitted in the Village Commercial area. '
The applicant has expressed concerns that it will be difficult for certain businesses such as
restaurants, delicatessens, and floral/gift basket shops to entice patrons if they are not permitted
to sell alcohol. The applicant has requested a text amendment to PDO-4' to change thè
Schedule of Permitted Uses to conditionally permit alcohol sales in the Village Commercial area
in conjunction with a bona fide use. The Schedule of Permitted, Uses ,for PDO-4 prohibits liquor
stores, and the applicant has expressed in a letter to the City (Attachment 5) that it is not his
intent to permit this use. The applicant is also requesting that "Blueprint, duplicating and copy
service" be changed to a permitted use in the Village Commercial area. '
Staff has reviewed the request to change the Schedule of Permitted Uses to allow alcohol sales,
and determined that it will not conflict with the 500 foot separation requirements from public
parks, schools; and religious institutions. The future Rancho Community Church Site is on the
opposite side of Highway 79 South, however, due to the site layout of both projects, the actual
uses for each project that would require 'separation meet the 500 foot separation requirement.
Staff is not opposed to the request to permit a blueprint, duplicating and copy service in, the
Village Commercial area.
In reviewing the Schedule of Permitted Uses for this PD~, staff discovered inconsistencies with
the use matrix. As a result staff is recommending several "clean-up" changes. The current
schedule of uses identifies "Nightclubs/taverns/bi'lrs/dance club/teen club" as not' being
permitted. However, in the existing use matrix, there is a footnote for this use in the Village
Commercial area, which implies that this use could be permitted. Staff suggests removing the
footnote from this use. Similarly, "Restaurants with lounge or live entertainmenr' is listed as a
use that is not permitted, but also has a footnote for this use in the Village Commercial area.
The supplemental design standards for PDO-4 encourage restaurants and eating places to
provide outdoor dining areas. Staff feels the original intent of the footnote was to permit outdoor
entertainment in concert with restaúrant uses. Therefore, staff suggests conditionally permitting
this use in the Village Commercial area in order to regulate the type of entertainment and hours
of operation.
There are also inconsistencies with the footnote text at the end of the Schedule of Permitted
Uses. Footnote number 1 contains a citation of the Municipal Code that no longer exists. Staff
recommends changing this citation from "Section 17.08.050(G)" to "Section 17.10.020(B)".. Also,
footnote number 3 refers to indoor swap meets and footnote 4 refers to storage and warehouse
facilities. These uses are not permitted in PDO-4. Therefore, these footnotes are not applicable
and should be deleted. The remaining footnotes should be renumbered, and the new footnote
numbers should be cross-referenced in the use matrix.
H:IP I) 0\2004\04-0384 Temecula C"ek Village (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08.04.04,dol
. 3
The proposed changes to the Schedule of Use Table and footnotes are as follows:
.
Alcoholic beverage sales (only as expressly permitted by Section I
17.22.1366)
I
Blueprint, Copying and Duplicating Service
Convenience market (without the sale of alcoholic beverages)
Convenience market (with the sale of alcoholic beverages)
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an
otherwise allowable use
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the
sale of beer and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of
beer, wine, and distilled spirits)
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
P
P
C
P
C
C
C
C
P
p"
CO'
C
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G) 17.10,020(B), special standards for the
sale of alcoholic beverages.
2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
ð-. Soo Soction 17.08.050(E), cpocial ct::md;:¡rdc for indoor cw;:¡p mootc.
4-. Soo Soction 17.080.050(R), cpoci;:¡1 ct;:¡ndardc for coif ctorago or mini ',,-,;:¡rohouco
íaGiIiIie6-.
ã-3. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and
periormance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions
contained in Section 17.06.050.H.
ê 4. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet.
:¡. 5. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted
provided that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off-site conversation.
g 6. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
~1.
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved Negative Declaration for Planning Application 99-0261 and is exempt from
further Environmental Review (CEOA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations).
.
R:\I' n 0\2004\04-0384 Tem"ulo C<eek Viibge (I'DO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04<101
4
.
1.
. 2.
3.
4.
5.
.
CONC LUSION/RECOMMEN DATION
Staff feels that it was never the intent of PDO-4 to prohibit the sale of alcohol for restaurant uses
in the Village Commercial area. However, as presently crafted, the S'chedule of Permitted Uses
does not make exceptions based on the type of use. Staff has reviewed the request by the
applicant to change the use matrix, and supports the changes proposed by the applicant.
Staff has suggested additional changes to clarify footnotes within the use matrix and the text of
the footnotes. Staff feels that .these additional changes further clarify the regulation of alcohol
related uses and will clean up internal inconsistencies within the PDO-4 text.
FINDINGS
Pianning Department staff: in reviewing Planning Application No. 04-0384 finds that the text,
amendment to the Development Code (PDO-4) is consistent with the adopted General Plan for
the City of Temecula, the site is physically suitable for the type of uses that could eventually
occur in this area, and the proposed text change would further the City's long-term economic
development goals.
A IT ACHM'ENTS
PC Resolution No. 2004----':' - Blue Page 6
Proposed Ordinance (Exhibit A) - Blue Page 9
Current Development Code -: PDO-4 - Blue Page 13
Notice of Exemption -: Blu~ Page 28
Letter from Applicant - Blue Page 30
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecula Creek Vmage (PDO-4)IPC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dot
5
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 1
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2004--
R:IP D O\2004\()4-03R4 T'mewb C""k Village (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dot
6
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL APPROVE AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE '17 OF THE TEMECULA
MUNICIPAL CODE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY
NO.4 TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULE OF PERMITTED USES TO
CONDITIONALLY PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL AND TO .
PERMIT BLUEPRINT AND DUPLICATING SERVICES IN THE
VILLAGE COMMERCIAL' AREA OF PDO-4, (PLANNING
APPLICATION PA04-0384)" .
WHEREAS, on November 9,1993, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted the
General Plan; and
WHEREAS, on January 25, 1995, the City Council of the City of Temecula initially
adopted the City's Development Code; and
WHEREAS, on November 28, 2000, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted
Planned Development Overlay District Number 4 (PDO-4); and .
WHEREAS, on June 02, 2004, David J. Esoldi, Temecula Creek Village, LLC applied for
a text only zoning amendment to revise the schedule of uses for the Temecula Creek Village
Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4); and .
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment on, August
4, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and
interested persons had an opportunity to, an did testify either in support or opposition to this
matter; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in approving Planning Application
No. 04-0384 hereby finds that the text amendment to the Development Code (PDO-4) is
consistent with the adopted General Plan for the City of Temecula; the site is physically suitable
for the type of uses that could eventually occur in this area, and the proposed text change would
further the City's long-term economic development goals.
Section 2. Environmental Compliance. The proposed amendment represents a
minor change to the Development Code to allow businesses to sell alcoholic beverages in the
, Village Commercial area of PDO-4, to permit blueprint, copying and duplicating services, and
identify how these Uses are to be approved by the City. A Negative Declaration was previously,
prepared and adopted for Planning Application 99-0261 (PDO-4). This application does' not
constitute an expansion or a change of condition, and asa result, the Planning Commission
recommends that the City Council make a determination that the proposal is exempt from
review under the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA
Guidelines.
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Temeeula Cceck V;]]agc (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04.04,<101
7
Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula
hereby recommends that the City Council adopt an ordinance amending the text of the
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4) and amending the
requirements for conditional use permits for certain businesses selling alcoholic beverages and
make other changes substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A. by the City
of Temecula Planning Commission this 41hday of August 2004.
John Telesio, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby that the
PC Resolution No. 2004-- was duly adopted and regularly adopted b~ the Planning
Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 41 day of August,
2004, by the following vote:
AYES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
K:II' D 0\2004\04.113"4 -remeea'" C"ek Village (I'DO-4)\PC STAH' KEPOKT 08.04-04.<101
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
PROPOSED ORDINANCE (Exhibit A)
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Tern",,]" Creek Vi]bge (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-O4,dm
9
.
.
.
ORDINANCE NO. 04--
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 17 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY NO.4 TO MODIFY
THE SCHEDULE OF, PERMITTED USES TO CONDITIONALLY PERMIT
THE SALE OF. ALCOHOL AND TO PERMIT BLUEPRINT AND
DUPLICATING SERVICES IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL AREA OF
PDO-4, (PLANNING APPLICATION PA04-0384),
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends portions of
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay as described below.
A. Add the listing for "Incidental alcoholic beverage sales" and modify the'listings for
Convenience Market and Restaurants and other eating establishments in Table 17.22.136B of
the Temecula Municipal Code with the following: .
Blueprint, Copying and Duplicating Service
Convenience market (without the sale of alcoholic beverages)
Convenience market (with the sale of alcoholic beverages)
Incidental alcoholic beverage sales in conjunction with an
otherwise allowable use
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with or without the
, sale of beer and wine)
Restaurants and other eating establishments (with the sale of
beer, wine, and distilled spirits)
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment
P
P
C
,P
C
C
C
C
P
pO4
CO4
C
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G) 17,10,020(B), special standards for the'
sale of alcoholic beverages. .
2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
ð-. Soo Soction 17.08.050(E), cpociGI ctGndGrdc for indoor C'fJGp mootc.
4-. Soo Soction 17.080.050(R), cpocial ctGndGrds for coif storage or mini '....(¡rohouse
faGiIitiB6-.
&-3. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and
periormance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions
contained in Section 17.06.050.H.
ê 4. The size of the, use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet.
Ro\P 00\2004\04-0384 Temec"la C"ck V;nage (PDO.4)\PC STAFF REPORT OS-04"04,dot
. ]0
7- 5. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted
provided that the outside noise levels do not interiere with off-site conversation.
S 6. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area.
.
B.
C.
D.
Revise Footnote Number 1 to show correct Code citation.
Delete existing footnotes 3 and 4 because these uses are not permitted.
Renumber the remaining footnotes.
Section 2, Severability. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any
reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity
of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the
provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction
shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision
shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance.
Section 3, Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of. this
Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law.
Section 4. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30)
days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause
copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places.
Section 5. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its
passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City
Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated
in said City.
.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this
- day of _,2004.
Mike Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones. CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
.
R:II' D 0\2004104-0384 Tc","ub C<cek Vmage (I'OO-4)II'C STAFF REPORT 08-04.04,<lul
II
.
.
.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the
foregoing Ordinance No. 04-- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a
regular meeting of the City Council on the - day of -, 2004 and that ¡hereafter, said
Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the -
day of -, 2004, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBER?:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:\P D 0\2004104-0384 Temecula C"'ck Vmage (PDQ-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-O4-O4.dol
12
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.3
CURRENT DEVELOPMENT CODE - TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED
DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT (PDO-4)
R:IF D 0\20O4\Ü4-0384 Temecub Cœck V;]]age (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,001
13
.
.
.
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT
17,22.130
TITLE
Sections 17.22.130 through 1.7.22.138 shall be known as "PDO-4" (Temecula Creek Village
Planned Development Overlay District). (Ord 2000-13) .
17,22,132
PURPOSE AND INTENT
The Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-4) is intended meet
the planned mixed use criteria contained in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. These
requirements are intended to provide regulations for the creative design of, and the safe and
efficient operation of a unique mixed area within the City. (Ord 2000-13)
17,22,134
RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN
GUIDELINES "
A.
The list of permitted, conditionally permitted, and prohibited uses for ,the
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District is contained in
Table 17.22.136.
B.
Except as modified by the provisions of Section 17.22.138, the following rules
and regulations shall apply to all planning applications in this area.
1.
The development standards in the Development Code that would apply to
any development within a Professional Office zoning district that are in
effect at the time an application is deemed complete.
2.
The Citywide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an
application is deemed complete.
3.
The approval requirements contained in the Development Code that are
in effect at the time the application is deemed complete.
4.
Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time
an application is deemed complete. (Ord 2000-13)
,17,22,136
USE REGULATIONS
The list of permitted land uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay
district is contained in Table 17.22.136.8. Planned Development Overlay - 4 contains three
different planning areas. Two of the areas are commercial, the third is residentially based. A
copy of the Planning Area map for this PD~ is contained in Exhibit 17.22.136. The three areas
are identified asf'.¡ollows: '
Retail/Support Commercial. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4R in Table 17.22.1~6.B),
Village Commercial Area. (identified as Planning Area PDO-4V in Table 17.22.136.B);
and,
R:IP D 0\2004\04.0384 Tomeo"la Creek Village (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04.<101
. 14
Multi-Family Residential Planning Areas. Unless specific standards are provided for this
Planning Development Overlay, the residential development standards for the High
Density Zoning District contained in Section 17.06 shall apply to this Planning Area.
.
District
.
SITE"""
,,"ACRES
RETAAl "ACRES
ßUI'<'ORT COMMERCIAL
""LTI-"""LV
~
321><000""
,ACR"
"ACRES
"ACRES
>ACRES
, " !
1 ~
,OTAl
",DACRES
.
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecol, Cleek V;Jlage (I'DO-4)\I'C STAFF REPORT 08-()4-04,dot
15
.
.
.
Where indicated with a letter "p" the use shall be a permitted use. A letter "C" indicates the use
shall be conditionally permitted subject to the approval of a conditional Üse permit. Where
indicated with a "-", the use. is prohibited within the zone.
Table 17,22,136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use. PDO-4R PDO-4V"
A
Adult business - -
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (less '
than 5,000 sq. ft.) P P
Aerobics/dance/gymnastics/jazzercise/martial arts studios (greater P -
than 5,000 sq. ft.)
Airports - -
Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities -
Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) P -
Alcoholic beverage sales C' -
Ambulance services - -
Animal hospital (indoor only) C -
Antique restoration - -
Antique sales, P -
Apparel and accessory shops P P"
Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P -
Arcades (pinball and video games) - -
Art supply stores P P"
Auction houses - -
Auditoriums and conference facilities - -
Automobile dealers (new and used) - -
Automobile sales (broke rag e)-showroom only (new and used)-no - -
outdoor display
Automobile Oil Change/Lube Services with no major repairs - -
Automobile painting and body shop - -
Automobile repair services . - -
Automobile rental C -
Automobile salvage yards/impound yards -
Automobile service stations with or without an automated car wash - -
Automotive parts- sales P -
Automotive service stations selling beer and/or wine - with or - -
without an automated car wash
R:\P [) 0\2004\04-0384 Tcm"" , Üœk Village (I'DO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08.04.O4.dol
, 16
Table 17.22,136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use PDO-4R PDO-4V'
B
Bakery goods distribution -
Bakery retail P p6-
Bakery wholesale - -
Banks and financial institutions P p
Barber and beauty shops P p
Bed and breakfast C -
Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p pb
Billiard parlor/pool hall -
Binding of books and similar publications - -
Blood bank - -
Blueprint and duplicating and copy services p -
Bookstores p pb
Bowling alley p -
Building material sales - -
Butcher shop p -
C
Cabinet shop - -
Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P p6
Candy/confectionery sales p p
Car wash, full service -
Carpet and rug cleaning C
Catering services p
Clothing sales p p6
Coins, purchase and sales p p
Cold storage facilities C -
Communications and microwave installations"
Communications equipment sales -
Community care facilities C
Computer sales and service p
Congregate care housing for the elderly5 C
Construction equipment sales, service or rental -
Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental - -
Convenience market p C
Costume rentals p p
R:W D 0\2004\04-0384 Tomeou]. Creek Vilioge (I'DO-4)IPC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dot
17
.
.
.
.
.
.
Table 17,22,136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description òf Use PDO-4R PDO-4V"
Crematoriums -
Cutlery P P
D
Data processing equipment and systems P
Day care centers C Co
Delicatessen P P
DiscounVdepartment store (less than 20,000 square feet). P -
Distribution facility - -
Drug store/pharmacy P po
Dry cleaners P P
Dry cleaning plant -
E
Emergency shelters - - ..
Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) P -
Equipment sales and rentals (outdoor storage) -
F
Feed and grain sales P
Financial, insurance, 'real estate offices P po
Fire and police stations P P
Floor covering sales P -
Florist shop ." P po
Food processing - -
Fortune telling, 'spiritualism, or similar activity P P
Freight terminals - -
Fuel storage and distribution . - -
Funeral parlors, mortuary -
Furniture sales (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P P"
Furniture transfer and storage -
G ".
Garden supplies and equipment sales and service C
(3as distribution, meter and control station -
General merchandise/retail store less than 10,000 sq. ft. P -
Glass and mirrors, retail sales P -
Governmental offices P po
R:IP D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecula Creek Village (PDO-4)IPC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dol
18
Table 17.22,136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use PDO-4R PDO-4V'
Grocery store, retail (less than 20,000 sq. ft.) P po
Grocery store, wholesale
Guns and firearm sales P
H
Hardware stores P po
Health and exercise clubs (less than 5,000 sq. ft.) P P
Health and exercise clubs (greater than 5,000 sq. ft.) p -
Health food store P P
Health care facility P P
Heliports -
Hobby supply shop P po
Home and business maintenance service p -
Hospitals C -
Hotels/motels -
I
Ice cream parlor P P
Impound yard - -
Interior decorating service P po
J
Junk or salvage yard -
K
Kennel I C -
L
Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers -
Laundromat P
Laundry service (commercial) - -
Libraries, museums and galleries (private) p -
Liquefied petroleum, sales and distribution - -
Liquor stores C -
Lithographic service - -
Locksmith P -
R:II' I) 0\2004\04-0384 Tcmc,"la Creek V;llage (1'1){)-4)II'C STAFF REPORT 08-04.()4,dot
19
.
.
.
.
.
.
Table 17,22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of ,Use PDO-4R PDO-4V.
M
Machine shop - -
Machinery storage yard - -
Mail order businesses P -
Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to, the
following:
Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, - -
and fabrication of goods within enclosed building (no
outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects,
clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and
'repair processes which do not involve frequent truck traffic.
Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, -
packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and
products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer
of heavy or bulky items. Wholesaling, storage, and
warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling,
shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and
wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi-
refined products requiring further processing or
manufacturing, and qutside storage. .'
- -
Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage
Massage . P P
Medical equipment sales/rental p -
Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C -
Mini-storage or mini-warehouse - -
Mobile home sales and service - -
Motion picture studio - -
Motorcycle sales and service - -
Movie theaters - .-
Musical and recording studio - -
N
Nightclubs/taverns/bars/dance club/teen club - -
Nurseries (retail) C -
Nursing homes/convalescent homes c -
R:IP D 0\2004\04-0384 Temccu," C,eek Village (PDO-4)\1'e STAFF REPORT 08-04.04,<101
20 .
Table 17.22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use PDO-4R I PDO-4V.
0
Office equipmenVsupplies, sales/services P -
Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than -
50,000 sq. ft.
Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft.,
including, but not limited to, business law, medical, dental, P p6
veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate,
Insurance
P
Paint and wallpaper stores P
Parcel delivery services -
Parking lots and parking structures - -
Pawnshop - -
Personal service shops P P
Pest control services - -
Pet grooming/pet shop P P
Photographic studio P P
Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) - -
Postal distribution - -
Postal services P P
Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.) -
Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities P -
Commission)
a
Reserved
R
Radio and broadcasting studios, offices P
Radio/television transmitter -
Recreational vehicle parks -
Recreational vehicle sales - -
Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed - -
building
Recreational vehicle, trailer and boat storage-exterior yard -
Recycling collection facilities -
Recycling processing facilities - -
R:\I' D O\2004I04-(ßR4 Temecod" c",k Vilbge (I'DO-4)\I'C STAFF REPORT 08-04-04.<101
21
.
.
.
.
.
.
Table 17,22.136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use PDO-4R PDO-4V.
Religious institution, without a day care or private school C -
Religious institution, with a private school c -
Religious institution, with a day care c -
Residential (one dwelling unit on the same parcel as a commercial - -
or industrial use for use of the proprietor of the business)
Residential, multiple-family housing - -
Restaurant with drive-through window - -
Restaurants and other eating establishments P po
Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment - -
Retail support use (15 percent of total development square footage - ,
in BP and LI)
Rooming and boarding houses - -
S
Scale, public - -
Schools, business and professional - -
Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade ,12) -' -
Scientific research and development offices and laboratories - -
Senior citizen housing (see also congregate care)" c -
Solid waste disposal facility - -
Sports and recreational facilities -
Swap Meet, entirely inside a permanent buildingO - -
Swap Meet, outdoor - -
Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales P -
T
Tailor shop P P
Taxi or limousine service P -
Tile sales P -
Tobacco shop P -
Tool and die casting -
Transfer, moving and storage - -
Transportation terminals and stations - -
Truck rentals (no sales or /service) - -
TV/VCR repair P po
U
Upholstery shop P -
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Tcmee.b C"oek V;]],'ge (PDO.4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08.04.04,dol
22
Table 17.22,136B
Schedule of Permitted Uses
Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District
Description of Use I PDO-4R I PDO-4V'
V
Vending machine sales and service I 1 -
w
Warehousing/distribution -
Watch repair P P
Wedding chapels
Welding shop -
Welding supply and service (enclosed) - -
y
Reserved
Z
Reserved I
1. The CUP will be subject to Section 17.08.050(G), special standards for the sale of
alcoholic beverages.
2. Subject to the requirements of Chapter 17.40 of the Temecula Municipal Code.
3. See Section 17.08.050(E), special standards for indoor swap meets.
4. See Section 17.080.050(R), special standards for self-storage or mini-warehouse
facilities.
5. In PDO-4, all senior housing residential projects shall use the development and
periormance standards for the High Density Residential zone and the provisions
contained in Section 17.06.050.H.
6. The size of the use or activity is limited to 5,000 square feet.
7. Outdoor entertainment in conjunction with an eating establishment is permitted provided
that the outside noise levels do not interfere with off-site conversation.
8. Drive through facilities are not allowed in the Village Planning Area.
Retail/Support Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4R.
Village Commercial Planning Area is identified as PDO-4V.
Multi-Family Planning Areas A & B use the High Density column in Table 17.06.030.
(Ord 2000-13)
Role D 012004\04-0384 Teme,," C<eek V;lIage (!'DO-4)I!'C STAFF RE!'ORT 08-04-04,dûl
23
.
.
.
.
.
.
17,22,138
C.
SUPPLEMENTAL DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS
A.
Multi-Family.
The requirements of the residential component shall depend upon the final
approved residential density. Residential densities less than 12 units per acre
shall comply with the Medium Density Residential zone standards set forth in
Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code. Residential densities in excess of 12
units per acre shall comply with the High Density Residential zone standards set
forth in Chapter 17,06 of the Development Code. The final maximum residential
density shall be determined by a traffic analysis provided to the City when an
application for development is submitted. The total future project trip generation
shall not exceed the number of trips ,allowable under. the General Plan
designation for the site.
B.
Retail/Support Commercial. '.
The development standards for the Professional Office zoning designation set
forth in Chapter 17.06 of the Development Code shall be utilized for the
Retail/Support Commercial planning àrea. .
The Village Planning Area for the Temecula Cre'ek'Village Planned Development
Overlay hás supplemental design guidelines integrated into this PDO. These
guidelines are intended to augment the previously adopted Citywide Design
Guidelines with requirements specific to this area and are as follows:
The Villàge area will serve as the vital activity center of Temecula Creek Vitlage.
Centrally located within the project, this group of buildings will contain a welcome
mixture of goods and services to complement life in the multi-family
neighborhoods. A state-of-the-art clubhouse facility will provide space for
meeting rooms, a librarY and reading rooms, computer rooms and other resident
amenities, as well as a "signature".pool and spa.'
1:
Mix Of Uses
The site' of the proposed Village area is approximately seven acres, and
will contain a variety of shops' and services, including: .
a. Retail stores
b. Restaurants
c. Recreational facilities
d. Commercial services
e. Medical and dental offices
In some cases, office uses could be iocated above ground floor retail
spaces. In addition, the ancillary uses of the residential. Neighborhoods,
such as the Community Clubhouse with its amenities and Support Retail
will be 10cateçJ' in t~e Central Retail Hub. .
R,IP 0 0\2004\Q4-0384 Temecu!a Üeek Village (PDO-4)IPC STAFF REPORT 08.Q4.Q4,dot .
24 '
2.
3.
Site Organization
.
The buildings in the village core will be organized around the A central
spine, which is also the primary entry corridor to the development.
a.
The mixed-use buildings planned for the Village Hub area will be
sited in such a way that their walls help to define the streetscape.
b.
The buildings closest to State Highway 79 will be located at the
minimum required front setback from that road.
c.
The primary driveway into the complex will be framed by buildings
on either side, creating a "gateway" into the central circulation
corridor.
d.
Additional buildings will be organized along the corridor, with their
entries pushed to the "imagined" property line along the circulation
road (the back of the sidewalk), creating an "urban" environment.
Pedestrian pass-through will be created in the gaps between
buildings ("paseos") to give access from parking areas.
e.
The buildings sited along the boulevard will be separated to allow
vehicular entry into the parking areas, which will be located behind
(and in some cases beside) the buildings.
f.
The visual axis of the central corridor will be terminated by the
community center building as its associated open space.
.
Parking And Circulation
The clustering of related used in the Village Retail Core makes shared
parking opportunities possible. The mix of offices, with their predominant
daytime use, with retail and restaurants, busy primarily at night, creates a
reciprocal parking condition. For this reason, the village parking demand
would be lower than what is otherwise required by the City of Temecula's
Development Code. It is proposed that the total demand of the anticipated
uses will be five spaces per thousand square feet of leasable retail/office
area.
a.
Direct vehicular access to the Village will be available via a
proposed controlled inter-section along Highway 79 South onto
the project's principal entry drive. This tree-lined street will provide
easy ingress to the egress from the parking areas serving the
facilities, in addition to angled parking spaces located on the drive
itself. Auto circulation will feature a continuous loop through the
public area of the village, helping to alleviate congestion in this
part of the site.
b,
Parking lots will be located behind (and in some cases beside) the
proposed buildings, so that the buildings help to screen the
parking areas. The lots will be landscaped to soften the hard
edges of the paving, and provide pockets of shade.
.
R,\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Temw,la C,eek Village (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dot
25
.
.
.
c.
-The "downtown" core will also be served by double rows of
diagonal parking, angled in the direction of travel both in and out
of the village area. Pedestrian "collector" walks will be detailed
with contrasting paving materials leading to identified crosswalks.
Accessible parking will be located in the angled parking,
which is curbside near retail entries. '
ii.
. Crosswalks will be laid out to coincide with pedestrian
plaza areas.
4.
Convenient bike parking will be provided in the Village core to
encoura~; human-powered travel in this area.
Pedestrian Open Spaces
d.
Generous landscaped plaza areas are planned in the midst of the retail
village to encourage the accumulation of patrons in the core who will visit
a number of establishments on any given outing.
a.
These oùtdoor gathering areas will be linked to the system of
walkways and bike paths, which traverse the site, creating
convenient access for residents..
b.
Pedestrian gathering areas will be made comfortable through the
inclusion of amenities which encourage rest stops: .
Benches and shade structures or trees.
, ii.
Trash cans and (where applicable) as urns.
. iii.
Kiosks.
5.
Building Scale And Design
The Village area structures will be limited to one or two siories:
,and will be designed to be complementary to the existing
residential scale of the neighborhood.
a.
b.
Buildings will be designed to include sufficient articulation of their
mass to provide an adequate sense of scale. Specific details
which may be used, for the purpose include,: '
Offsetting portions of the buildings to avoid long expanses
of unbroken wall surface. .
ii.
Locating entries and fenestration in recesses to provide
additional shade and shadow on the building faces.
iii.
Use of awnings, canopies, and blade signs to provide
additionallighVshadow play and visual rhythms.
R:\P D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecu!a Creek ymage (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT OS-O4-04,dol .
26
iv.
Large openings with clear glass will be provided at the
street level to provide increased visibility into the retail
spaces.
v.
Select staggering of upper and lower floors to avoid
unbroken two-story wall surfaces.
vi.
Use of staggered parapet heights and sloping roof forms to
give variety to building "skylines."
c.
Buildings with ground floor retail will be set close to the streets to
facilitate pedestrian access.
d.
Restaurants and food uses within the village will be encouraged to
provide outdoor dining facilities. Where possible, these "fresh-air"
eating patios should adjoin pedestrian walkways.
e.
Exterior building finishes should consist of a complementary
variety of quality materials, including the following:
Exterior plaster in various textures and colors.
ii.
Exposed colored concrete block of split face, fluted,
burnished, or sandblasted textures.
iii.
Brick and natural or cultured stone.
iv.
Decorative architectural metals, such as grilles or railings.
v.
Metal or concrete (not mission) tile roof.
vi.
Metal or fabric canopies or awnings. (Ord 2000-13)
R:\P D 0\2004104-0384 Tcmeeula C<cck V;llage (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dot
27
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 4
.
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
.
RoW D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecula C",k V;]lagc (PDO-4)\PC STAF!' REPORT 08-04-04,dol
28
åity of Temecula
.Ianning Department
Notice of Exemption
TO:
County Clerk and Recorders Office
County of Riverside
P.O. Box 751 .
Riverside,'CA 92501-0751
FROM: Planning Department
City of Temecula
P. O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Project Title: Temecula Creek Village Planned Development Overlay District Text Amendment (PA04-0384)
Description of Project:
Revise the Schedule of Permitted Uses for the Temecula Creek Village Planned
Development Overlay District (PDO-4) to permit the sale of alcohol and permit
blueprint and copy services in the Village Commercial area;' and correct
inconsistencies in footnote text for PDÓ-4
Project Location:,
The south side of Highway 79 South between,Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida
De Missiones, in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, California.
Project Applicant/Proponent: David J. Esoldi, Temecula Creek Village, LLC
8e Director of Planning approved the above de'scribed activity on June 16, 2004, and found that the activity is
t a project and is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended.
Exempt Status: (check one)
Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); Sec. 15268):
Deciared Emergency (Sec. 21080(b)(3); Sec. 15269(a));
Emergency Project (Sec. 21080(b)(4); Sec. 15269(b)(c));
Statutory Exemptions (Section Number:_)
Categorical Exemption: Ciass 11 (Section Number -)
Other: Previous Neqalive Deciaration (Section 15162)
.JL
Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt:
A prior Negative Declaration for prepared for the original adoption of PDO-4 (Planning Application 99-026).
The proposed text amendment to Section 17.22.136B of the Development Code will not create any expansion
of use or create additional impacts not already evaluated in the adopted Negative Declaration. As a result, this
project qualifies for an Exemption pursuant to the provisions of Section 15162 of the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelines. .
Contact PersonrTitle: Emery J. Papp, AICP, Senior Planner
Phone Number; (951) 694-6400
Signature:
Date:
Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning
.
R:IP D 0\2004\04-0384 Temecu], Cæck Vill'gc (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,<101
29
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 5
LETTER FROM APPLICANT
RW D 0\2004\04-0384 Tomec"¡,, Cn:ek VilJage (PDO-4)\PC STAFF REPORT 08-04-04,dOl
JO
.
.
.
April 30,2004
Emery Papp
CityofTemeeula
Dear'Emery,
~
TEMECUlA CREEK VlllAGE~
Please consider the following ehanges that are permitted uses on Temecula Creek
Villages PDO-4R but not on our PDO-4V8. It has beeome difficult to lease to
restaùrants, Deli's, flower and gift shops etc. that are not permitted to sell or include in
gift baskets beer or wine. It is not our intent to open a liquor store but to simply be able
to operate a restaurant and be able to serve beer and wine, to have a deli include sales of
beer or wine.
The other ehangesjust give us much more flexibility in leasing. We want to lease the
Village successfully which is favorable for us as owners and the City ofTemecula as
wcll.
Thank you for your consideration in these matters.
, Si;1þrsA
David J. Esoldi (Skeeter)
16236 S," O"GU"O Ro" Su", 3-10
POST o"'G' Bo' 9296
RANGHO SANTA F, CA 92067
TEl.858/756-7584 FAX. 858/756-7S94
~
TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE~
Ref: Table 17.22,136B Schedule of Permitted Uses
The following are change requests for permitted
uses on Temecula Creek Villages PDO-4R
th~ w<; would lik<; to h~v<; inç1wlt;d on onr POO-4 V~
Description of Use
Allowed
PDO-4R
Alcohol bevcrage sales
CI
Blueprint, duplicating & copy service
P
-CBterifig Ser"ic"~
p
T(>Þ~crc, Shop
P
16236 S", °"°"'0 Ro" S"" 3-10
Po" Omcc 80' 9296
RANC<O SAN" FE CA 92067
TEL, 858/756-7584 FAX,858/756-75"
.
Chanl!e To
PDO-4V8
CI
P
p
p -
.
.