The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About081004 CC/PC Jnt. Workshop Agenda Yhb In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (90g) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] AGENDA JOINT CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION AN ADJOURNED REGULAR WORKSHOP CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE AUGUST 10,2004 - 5:00 P.M. ********** At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. CAll TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar Flag.Salute: Councilman Roberts ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, Naggar Planning Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, Telesio PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed .with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five-minute (5) time limit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL/PLANNING COMMISSION REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council/Planning Commission on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. R:\Agenda\081004 COUNCIL/COMMISSION BUSINESS 1 General Plan Land Use Issue Discussion RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Provide direction to staff and the consultant on the Community Advisory Committee's recommended Draft General Plan. ADJOURNMENT City Council next regular meeting: Tuesday, August 24, 2004,7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Planning Commission next regular meeting: Wednesday, August 18, 2004, 6:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\081 004 2 ITEM 1 I, \ APPROV AL CITY ATTORNEY'"t'_;/'U'~ DIRECTOR OF FINAlE ptL- CITY. MANAGER / i ' 1/ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/Planning Commission FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of Planning DATE: August 10,2004 SUBJECT: Joint City Council/Planning Commission Workshop on the Draft General Plan PREPARED BY: David Hogan, Principal Planner RECOMMENDATION: Provide Direction to Staff and the Consultant on the Community Advisory Committee's Recommended Draft General Plan BACKGROUND: The City has hired Cotton/Bridges Associates to assist in updating the General Plan. Since this process began, the Council has appointed the Community Advisory Committee (CAG) to work with the staff and the consultant. The CAC has provided their final comments on the draft of the updated General Plan. In previous joint meetings, the City Council and Planning Commission have reviewed and provided direction on the following important foundations to the Updated General Plan. . Vision Statement . Issues and Concerns . Draft Goals and Policies . Land Use Alternatives . Rural Preservation Areas (Eastern, Southern, and Nicolas Valley) . Mixed Use Areas The purpose of this meeting is to solicit comments and feedback from both the City Council and. Planning Commission on the direction of the Updated General Plan. This will be facilitated by the General Plan Consultant who will present the Community Advisory Committee's recommended changes to the General Plan. A copy of the draft of the Updated General Plan has already been provided to you under separate cover. The Updated General Plan does not include the updated Housing Element that was approved in October 2002. The Housing Element will be incorporated into the Final Plan after it is adopted. Development of the next update of the Housing Element is expected to begin in late 2005. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Final Joint CC PC MeetinQ.doc 1 , , INTRODUCTION: For all the Elements of the General Plan, the essential and overall policy direction is proposed to remain the same. In some areas where changes are proposed they fit within the framework of the existing General Plan. Most of changes represent a shift in format and minor text clean-up items. The most common clean-up items include: items reflecting changed circumstances, to more carefully delineate between goal and policy statements and implementation measures, to try to combine similar policy statements into a single policy for greater clarity, and to update the implementation program for each element. While most of the changes are being made to the Land Use and Circulation Elements, there are a number of other . changes being made to many of the General Plan Elements. Land Use Element The primary changes in the Land Use Element are the inclusion of a discussion for Mixed Use and Rural Preservation Areas. The Mixed Use provisions are expected to provide additional opportunities to revitalize some old areas of the City and to help meet the City's Housing Element goals. Goal 2, Encouraging Mixed Use, provides the framework for future mixed use projects. The Rural Preservation discussion is intended to identify areas that need to stay rural to protect the character and quality of life in the area. Goal 3, Preserving Rural Areas, discusses how these areas should be protected. The direction provided by the remaining Goals and Policies remains the same. Much of the southern and eastern Planning Area is included within Rural Preservation Areas. The locations of the Rural Preservation and Mixed Use areas are shown on Attachment NO.1. Land Use Desionations In the General Plan Update, several new Land Use Designations are proposed to respond to changes within the City and the Planning Area. The new Land Use Designations are as follows: . The Rural Residential Designation would establish a 5 acre minimum lot size. This new designation is intended primarily to help maintain lower density development in more rural areas in and around the City. Much of the eastern Rural Preservation Area is proposed to receive this designation. . The Vineyards/Agriculture Designation is intended to identify areas used for agriculture in the Planning Area. The General Plan currently has no way of designating areas for long term agricultural use. This new designation will be applied to large areas of the Eastern and Southern Rural Preservation Area. . The new Tribal Trust Lands Designation is proposed for properties in the Planning Area that have been designated as lands held in trust for the Pechanga Band by the Federal Government. These areas have important economic and environmental impacts on the City. By identifying them as Tribal Trust Lands, it is our goal to recognize tribal sovereignty while indicating the City's interest in cooperating with the Pechanga Band in these areas. At this time, all the tribally owned property in the southern portion of the City and Planning Area are proposed to receive this designation. . A Commercial Recreation Overlay for golf courses, resorts, as well as RV resorts and campground facilities. This would be used as an overlay on areas designated Open Space to indicate that non-open space accessory commercial uses are envisioned to occur in these areas. A good example of this is Temecula Creek Inn; most of the site is used for open space purposes. However there is also a small area of visitor serving resort and commercial uses that form an integral part of the facility. This change is being suggested in recognition that the current Open Space Designation does not adequately address resort types of open space uses. R:\General Plan\Coll'l> Plan Update\Final Joint CC PC MeeUng.doc 2 The final change is the proposal to rename the Business Park Land Use Designation to Industrial Park to eliminate the confusion with the Business Park Zone. No changes are being proposed to the types of development that would be allowed in these areas with this name change. Land Use MaD The original General Plan Land Use Map was hand drawn at a fairly large scale. In the process of preparing the Updated Plan, Staff has gone back over the original Land Use Map and worked to match General Plan designations to both the existing development pattern that conformed to the General Plan and to the existing property lines. Many of the minor adjustments to the map reflect these types of insignificant changes being made to match the Land Use Plan to the GIS base map. However, there are also a number of other Land Use Map changes that are either more substantial clean up items or are specific change requests to the Land Use Map that were made by the property owners. The various changes are identified in Attachment NO.2. The staff suggested changes to the Land Use Map are as follows: . Chaparral High School, from Business Park to Public Institutional. . Southeast corner of SR-79S and Butterfield Stage Road, from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial. . Great Oak High School, from Medium Density Residential to Public Institutional. . The Westside Specific Plan and other areas along the western City Limits, numerous minor adjustments to reflect the open space conditions, as well as tribal and other ownership conditions. (These changes are not shown on Attachment No.2) Approximately 15 land use requests have been submitted by various property owners through this process. Some of the changes were supported by the CAC, while others were not. For five of these requests, it is recommended that consideration be deferred until other issues are resolved. Three requests (Nos. 2, 4 and 5) are located in or adjacent to the Nicolas Valley area. Because of the uncertainty with the issues of (1) no building permits off of dirt roads and (2) the uncertain timing for the Roripaugh Ranch project, Staff is recommending that the changes in these areas not be seriously considered until these other intervening issues are resolved. In addition, there were two requests (Nos. 8 and 9) adjacent to the proposed Temecula Education Project. It is also recommended that consideration of these requests be deferred until the exact nature of the Education Project is known and construction has been initiated. A summary of all the land use requests considered by the CAC is contained in Attachment NO.3. The property owner requested changes that were supported by the Community Advisory Committee and are included in the Updated General Plan are as follows: Request 1. Five acres on the northside of the Santa Gertrudis channel adjacent to Margarita Road. The CAC supported a change from Public Institutional to Professional Office. Nine acres on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way. The CAe supported a change from Medium Density Residential to a combination of Professional Office and Open Space. Request 3. R:\General PlanlComp Plan Updale\Final Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 3 Request 7. Forty-five acres on the northside of Loma Linda Road, east of Temecula Lane. The CAC supported a change from .Professional Office to a combination of Low Medium Residential and Medium Density Residential. Request 10. Eighteen acres west of Butterfield Stage Road between Chenin Clinet and Ahern Place. The CAC supported a change from Low Density Residential to Low Medium Density Residential. Request 12. Twenty a cres at the northeast corner 0 f Winchester and Nicolas Roads. T he CAC supported a change from Neighborhood Commercial to Community Commercial. The property owner requested changes that were not supported by the Community Advisory Committee and are not included in the Updated General Plan are as follows: Request 6. Seven acres immediately south of the TemecuJa Creek Village. The CAC did not support the requested change from Open Space to a more developable designation. Request 11. Three acres at the northwest corner of Margarita and Dartolo Roads. The CAC did not support the requested change from Professional Office to Community Commercial. Request 13. Three hundred four acres at Temecula Creek Inn. The CAC did not support the requested change for parts of the site from Open Space to Low Medium Density Residential as well as a request to specify the preparation of a Specific Plan on the property. Request 14. Two acres at the northeast corner of SR-79 South and Jedediah Smith Road. The CAC did not support the requested change from Very Low Density Residential to Professional Office. 'j A major change to the Land Use Map in the French Valley area has also been made. Since the initial adoption of the City General Plan, the County made many land use changes without notifying the City. As a result, the City General Plan bore little resemblance to the land use pattern being developed in this area. In modifying the Land Use Map in the French Valley, a great deal of effort was spent trying to work within the context of the granted entitlements trying to ensure the creation of a desirable and livable urban area. Staff is still working on ways to improve the livability of this area given the current land uses. The Eastern and Southern Rural Preservation Areas in the expanded planning area will be designated mostly as Vineyard/Agriculture and Rural Residential, with some limited Very Low Density Residential areas where there is a number of existing 2Y:. acre lots. Circulation Element The primary changes to the policy direction in the Circulation Element are provisions to allow for additional street dedication (beyond the standardized rights-of-way) around higher volume key intersections and the Community Advisory Committee's recommendation to consider opening closed connecting streets to improve citywide circulation. The direction provided by the remaining Goals and Policies remains the same. Roadwav Cross-Sections R:\General Plan\CCllll' Plan Updale\Final Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 4 In an effort to fine tune the road network iJ1 some of less urban portions of the City, two new roadway cross sections are being proposed. Both of the new cross sections are based upon the standard 88 foot Secondary Arterial. The first is the Modified Secondary Arterial, initially assigned to De Portola and Ynez Roads through Los Ranchitos, would have two divided lanes in each direction with no curb, gutter or sidewalk to maintain the rural character of the area. The second is the Limited Secondary Arterial would have one lane in each direction, with a left turn lane and a separated trail. This cross section would be used in areas where lower traffic volumes are expected and where the separation of equestrian and pedestrian traffic is important. This is proposed for portions of Nicolas Road, Santiago Road, and North General Kearny. To better match the County Circulation Plan, a Rural Highway standard is also being proposed. Rural Highways generally have 0 ne lane in each direction with I eft turn pockets, though in some areas two lanes may be needed. Other changes include: o Combining the previous Arterial and Major Arterial Roadway categories into a single roadway designation because there was very little difference between the two. o The addition of a Rural Highway cross section not only protects future rights-of-way, but also helps maintain the rural character of the area. The Rural Highway roadway anticipates that, in most cases, the full roadway cross section will not be constructed until there are substantial changes in the area. The Rural Highway designation is primarily used in the rural areas around the City. Circulation MaD Overall the Circulation Plan is not substantially changing within the City. However, in the Planning Area, there are a number of changes to try to match the County Circulation Plan or address the circulation problems that are expected to remain in French Valley. The proposed Updated Circulation Plan contains a number of new roadways as well as changes to the size designations. The new major roadways are as follows: . Loma Linda/Avenida de Missiones between Pechanga Parkway and SR-79S. . North General Kearny from Deer Meadow .Road (near Nicolas Road) to near the northern segment of Calle Pina Colada. . Eastern Bypass consisting of Anza Road, Deer Hollow Way, and a southern connection to Interstate 15 via a new interchange. T his is consistent with the proposed County Circulation Pian. . Sky Canyon Road/Briggs Road parallel route along Winchester Road past the future bottleneck area by French Valley Airport. The Circulation Plan also incorporates the final roadway designs within the approved specific plan. I n addition, the following roadways a re proposed to bee xpanded ins ize tom eet the projected needs. . Winchester Road from Jefferson Road to Hunter Road - Urban Arterial 6-lane to Urban Arterial 8-lane. R:\GeneraJ P1an\Comp Plan Updale\Fina! Joint CC PC Meeting,doc 5 . Rancho California Road from Old Town Front Street to Ynez Road - Urban Arterial 6- lane to Urban Arterial 8-lane. . Rancho California Road from Ynez Road to Margarita Road - Arterial (4-lane) to Urban Arterial 6-lane. . Ynez Road from Rancho California Road to Rancho Vista Road - Arterial (4-lane) to Urban Arterial 6-lane. . Jefferson Avenue from Winchester Road to the City Limits - Arterial (4-lane) to Urban Arterial 6-lane. . Western Bypass Road - Secondary Arterial to a Major Arterial. Both these roadways have four lane configurations. Housing Element The Housing Element is not being updated as part of this program. The current s(;:hedule has the next update of the Housing Elementbeginning in late 2005 or 2006. Open Space and Conservation Element There are no major policy changes proposed for the Open Space and Conservation Element. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element The only policy change is the addition of a statement discouraging street closures that may limit or delay access to emergency services. There are no other policy changes in the Grow1h Management/Public Facilities Element. Public Safety Element There are no major policy ch,~lnges proposed for the Public Safety Element. Noise Element There are no major policy changes proposed for the Noise Element. Air Quality Element There are no major policy changes proposed for the Air Quality Element. Community Design Element There are no major policy changes proposed for the Community Design Element. However, there is some additional discussion on the Mixed Use Design Concept and on public spaces and public art. Economic Development Element There are no major policy changes proposed for the Economic Development Element. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Updale\Final Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 6 SCHEDULE Based upon the direction and comments provided by the City Council and Planning Commission, we anticipate the following schedule of events: September, 2004 Community Workshop, Community Services Commission and Traffic Safety Commission Presentations September, 2004 Submit the Draft Plan to the Airport Land Use Commission for review October - November, 2004 Public Review Period for the Environmental Impact Report December, 2004 Planning Commission Hearing(s) begin January, 2005 Projected City Council Hearing(s) Attachments: 1. Mixed Use and Rural Preservation Areas 2. Location Map for the Land Use Map 'Change Requests 3. Summary of General Plan Land Use Request Actions R:\General P13rlICornp Plan Updale\Final Joinl CC PC Meeting.doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO.1 MIXED USE AND RURAL PRESERVATION AREAS R:\General PlanlComp Plan Updale\Final Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 8 Figure LU-4 Land Use Focus Areas ... r<klool..'~ .-.. CITY OF TEMECUIA GENERAL PLAN M'~ ih.. legend 11II(1.1 Nlk:o.:J ~/Iy,~ ! Mixed Use Overlay Areas Rural Preservation Areas Future Growth Area Ciryof0"urrieta S here..ol Influen . " ~ j l Temecula City Boundary Sphere of Influence Boundary - Planning Area Source: Temecula GIS and Cotton/Bridges/Associates N 0 5,000 10;000 {l . ~~ H H I IFeet" W _ ~E '" !Y H. H I 1i\1iJes S 0 2 C 1 T Y o F TCMCCLlL:A LU-]I CCNCl1...r\L P L 1\ N .-(/'/,.1 <,,'/L,. / ~!t}Js1- ---~~,'<1~ L A N D u S E ATTACHMENT NO.2 LOCATION MAP FOR THE LAND USE MAP CHANGE REQUESTS R:\General P1anIComp Plan Updale\Final Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 9 General Plan Update - Description of Proposed Changes July 30,2004 r\'"" '-(" MQIiJ ~ V > II " I'W~ \ "/ .~J-;l.... ~ " ,,~ ;:-~I I r.JII INGSRO ',~ "'-, '\.' '':;7"'1'''' ." ~ -[. \/ \1 /'\~ '>(""~~ .~~ ,j~F-~ -1... -,- <~)~~~~~ !:<:0&'? I ~. /" "./, ~~~~.~ ~;~~ ~ ~\ "- /. Q~ ~H''''~~",~Yi0>~' '- -J ~ '~ ~ W; ~~ d. ..::J'J (,V- ~ 7r I "- r f "-'r-~. t . ., ~ yY '-'.rr-~ :c , ~~ Vr: ,~~ ~~/L~ (V~\ ~ X #:=1 ,Ie ~ G-l'<~" "~~~ ~ ~lTfX2Ji~~~] '- fl.~ ,~\~\ \'-~? \, ')'-Y-/'d~J' 4=.~1J::." ,\\ :'< '( /) . ;,. -", /~\ .\ ~). V"'~ _ '\.\ // ~ ,;::::-. i;...\t\- 0 ~:" >NclC.:'Y;,11 ~~ '\ Vv ~ / ~.~~ 2' .~:~ ~~ ~\.~/~~ - ~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ _~ / L; ~J~ h ;' /1~~\~:01- V ~ ~3~ /).;Y/,\ \ \ ~ ( c.. s~K:;.. 11""Yk<~ \..-~ L,f-2 ~\ ' , ',- ~~~~ ,~ .~~0~ I ,J S- ,_ =---=- t.- l.~ ';:: .~)'\ ~ '-<r n 'n ,_ h-, r ~ ~- ql ~ <:::~);: ~: Type of Proposed Chongo e 13 (1 ~-... ')....' \" ~ :..r 8 CAC Not In Support . -j ,0- ;--{ I~ r ~;"~ y/ ~~~tk>no.ten.d .... \ Kt ~~ ~V "~ \\\ -. N~::hw~mendod . ~ '''~~~ :"""-::<.':::J / :rs.t. Streets ffi ____.~_._ I ;I 77'" O.l.W D ctty \AJ ---- ~ J . /~ ~D~~~~~ - ~ - -- -.., rlglsldeg8ngel...cview profectaIgpupdat...pr II ............., ~ [']'J \. --' ATTACHMENT NO.3 SUMMARY OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE REQUESTS ACTIONS .' R\General PlanlCOIlll Plan UpdatelFlnal Joint CC PC Meeting.doc 10 SUMMARY OF GENERAL PLAN LAND USE MAP ACTIONS BY THE CAC ';': ';' L:~~"";:.~EQUE~t:iNF.,9~~ATION':::";' ", .' NO. APN(s): SIZE: REQUEST: REQUESTOR: Peter Stirling, WM 11 Partners, LP LOCATION: Northside of the Santa Gertrudis channel between Margarita Road and Rustic Glen Drive . 911-090-003 5.4 Ac From Industrial Park (IP) and Public Institutional (PI) to Professional Office (PO) DISCUSSION: The property consists of a long thin remnant piece left over from the channelization of Santa Gertrudis Creek. At the northeastern end, there is a developable Industrial Park designated site adjacent to Rustic Glen Drive. At the southwestern end there is a much smaller Public institutional zoned site that could be developed adjacent to Margarita Road. In between these two sites is narrow strip of land approximately 35 feet wide that connects these sites. 1 . CAC RECOMMENDATION: Unanimous support for Professional Office. This has been shown on the draft Land Use Plan. 2. REQUESTOR: Boy Scouts of America LOCATION: Southeast of.the intersection of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo APN(s): 919-350-017,018,019, and 020 SIZE: 72.3 Ac REQUEST: From Very Low Density Residential (VL) to Low Medium Density Residential (LM) and Open Space (OS) DISCUSSION: The property consists of 4 large parcels located between the northeast edge of the Meadowview area between the tract' homes along Nicolas Road and the Nicolas Valley area. The applicant has indicated a desire to concentrate future development adjacent to Nicolas Road consistent with the tract homes along Via Lobo and leave most of.the site as permanent open space. The development potential of the site is limited by existing utility easements, the normally dry wash that bisects the property, and its proximity to the Meadowview and Nicolas Valley areas. At the current General Plan Designation, up to 29 units could be permitted. The applicant's current proposal is to have 73 lots. CAC RECOMMENDATION: There was a lot of discussion on this item with a clear concensus. When the issue of Nicolas Valley was raised, the CAC deferred their recommendation pending a future meeting with the property owners in the Nicolas Valley area. At a subsequent meeting, a majority of the CAC felt that keeping the property Very Low Density was appropriate. No changes were made to Land Use Plan. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Information - Action Summary.doc Page 1 . NO ' ':.,:,.P,.:,..i'::.i'REQi!j'ESm:IN~'ORMAiTIjONJ:J": ....:,..:;; .: : .' ", 'r.', .r.;::. .'.., ';'"''''i.;:::.:,:",,,:'i:::'..Ji,:. ,,', .."".",,6..:1,..,. ':",..,.,. ...., :" .... ..J'~.:.".i...,.,. ':'........ REQUESTOR: Melinda Smith LOCATION: Southeast of the intersection of Margarita Road and Solana Way APN(s): 921-330-005,024,025,026, and 027 SIZE: 9.2 Ac REQUEST: From Medium Density Residential (MD) to Professional Office (PO), . Neighborhood Commercial (NC), and Open Space (OS) DISCUSSION: The property consists of the vacant area east of Margarita Road and west 3. ofdthe ABt'tY PMreSChOtOI.RThde proNPosahlbwohuld ddecsignate thelfrondtathge . a Jacen 0 argari a oa as elg or 00 om mercia an e frontage along Solana Way as Professional Office. The frontage along Via La Vida, including most of the existing stream channel would be the Open Space area. ' CAC RECOMMENDATION: A majority supported Professional Office and Open Sp'ace. Other opinions supported the Neighborhood Commercial component or making the entire site open space. The Professional Office and Open Space designations have been shown on the draft Land Use Plan. 4. REQUESTOR: Steve Galvez '. LOCATION: Between Butterfield Stage Road and Walcott Lane north of Solana Way APN(s): 957-170-032,033,034,035, and 036 SITE: 22 Ac REQUEST: From Very Low Density Residential (V~) to Low Density Residential DISCUSSION: The proposal is to increase the density to allow for % acre lots immediately north of the new Shea Homes development along Walcott Lane. This site is located within the Nicolas Valley area. CAC RECOMMENDATION: The discussion of this request was put off until after a future meeting with the property owners in the Nicolas Valley area. Because of the uncertainty over the dirt road issue and future changes resulting from the eventual development of the Roripaugh Ranch project, land use changes in Nicolas Valley are being deferred. 5. REQUESTOR: Markham Development Management Group LOCATION: South of Nicolas Road between Calle Medusa and Calle Girasol APN(s): 957-150-001,002,003, and 016 SIZE: 18.0 Ac REQUEST: From Very Low Density Residential (VL) to Low Medium Density Residential (LM) DISCUSSION: The proposal is to increase the density to allow for the creation of additional suburban density lots within the Nicolas Valley Area CAC RECOMMENDATION: The discussion of this request was put off until after a future meeting with the property owners in the Nicolas Valley area. Because of the uncertainty over the dirt road issue and future changes resulting from the eventual development of the Roripaugh Ranch project, land use.changes in Nicolas Valley are being deferred. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Infonnation - Action Summary.doc Page 2 6. REQUESJINFORMAmioN". . REQUESTOR: Markham Development Management Group LOCATION: South of the Temecula Creek Vi!lage project and west of the extension of Jedediah Smith Road APN(s): 961-010-004 SIZE: 7.5 Ac REQUEST: From Open Space'(OS) to Unspecified Designations DISCUSSION: The property consists of a long thin strip of land between the Temecula Creek Village project and wetland mitigation areas adjacent to Temecula Creek. According to the applicant they now have an access easement to the property and are requesting that this site be considered to be fully developable with a lower intensity version of the Temecula Creek Village project. CAC RECOMMENDATION: A majority of the CAC felt that Open Space was the correct use for this property. A minority of the CAC supported the request. . . NO. 7. REQUESTOR: Markham Development Management Group LOCATION: Northside of Loma Linda Road, east of Temecula Lane APN(s): 961-010-016,018,019,020, and 021 SIZE: 45.5 Ac REQUEST: From Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (MD) DISCUSSION: The property is located between Loma Linda Road and Temecula Creek between Rawhide Park and the existing single family residences across from Erie Stanley Garner Middle School. The applicant has provided a preliminary plan that suggests a combination of detached and attached units in this area. The detached units are proposed for the eastern side of the site adjacent to the existing tract homes. CAC RECOMMENDATION: Supported Low Medium Density on the eastern-third and Medium Density on the western two-thirds. A minority of the CAC wanted either only Low Medium Density or a change to something that would add no new vehicle trips onto Pechanga Parkway. This has been shown on the draft Land Use Plan. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Information. Action Summary.doc Page 3 NO. , REQUEsrp:lNFORMA TION REQUESTOR: Markham Development Management Group LOCATION: Southwest of the City's Northwest Sports Park (Temecula Education Project) 909-370-018 52.8 Ac From Industrial Park (IP) to Community Commercial (CC), High Density Residential (HD), and Medium Density Residential (MD)/Mixed Use. DISCUSSION: This site is immediately adjacent to the proposed Temecula Education Project. The proposal is for a combination of commercial and residential land uses that would be intended to complement the proposed Education Project. CAC RECOMMENDATION: No discussion on this item. Staff felt that changes in this area should not be considered until after more was known about the Temecula Education Project and it effects on the surrounding area. APN(s): SIZE: REQUEST: 8. REQUESTOR: Ray Hanes, Spanos Group LOCATION: South and west of the City's Northwest Sports Park (Temecula Education Project) adjacent to Request NO.8. 909-370-032 32.6 Ac From Industrial Park (IP) to either High Density Residential (HD) or Medium Density Residential (MD) DISCUSSION: This site is south of the property identified in Request NO.8. The proposal is for additional residential land uses that would be intended to compliment the proposed Education Project. CAC RECOMMENDATION: No discussion on this item. Staff felt that changes in this area should not be considered until after more was known about the Temecula Education Project and it effects on the surrounding area. APN(s): SIZE: REQUEST: 9. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Information - Action Summary.doc Page 4 NO. on REQUEST INFORMATION' 10. REQUESTOR: May Group LOCATION: West of Butterfield Stage Road between Chenin Clinet and Ahern Place APN(s): 935-390-007. and 009 SIZE: 18.3 Ac REQUEST: From Very Low Density Residential (VL) to Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) DISCUSSION: The site is a long thin piece immediately adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road within the Margarita Village Specific Plan. The approved Specific Plan for this area describes the density as one unit per acre. The General Plan identifies 2 Y, acre lots. Realistically, the change would be from Low Density to Low Medium Density. The eventual implementation of this request will also require a Specific Plan Amendment. CAC RECOMMENDATION: Supported a change to Low Medium Density Residential. One member wanted the density to stay at one-unit per acre. This has been shown on the draft Land Use Plan. 11. REQUESTOR: Westfall Construction LOCATION: Northwest corner of Margarita and Dartolo Roads APN(s): 950-100-003 and 016 SIZE: 2.8 Ac REQUEST: From Professional Office (PO) to Community Commercial (CC) DISCUSSION: The site is located west of the proposed hospital site and east of the Albertons/Home Depot Shopping Center along the north side of Dartolo Road. CAC RECOMMENDATION: The CAC felt that retaining PO made the most sense in this location. REQUESTOR: Pacific Development Partners LOCATION: Northeast corner of Winchester and Nicolas Roads APN(s): 920-100-001 and 013 SIZE: 20.2 Ac REQUEST: From Neighborhood Commercial (NC) to Community Commercial (CC) DISCUSSION: The site part of the Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan. Under the original Specific Plan, the land use regulations referenced the C-1/CP (General 12. Commercial) in County Ordinance 348. The text description in the SP described it as Neighborhood Commercial and it was designated as Neighborhood Commercial in the City General Plan. However, typical Neighborhood Commercial sites were envisioned to be smaller than 10 acres while the Neighborhood Commercial zoning standards are more appropriate for shopping centers under 5 acres in size. CAC RECOMMENDATION: The CAC supported this change. This has been shown on the draft Land Use Plan. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Information - Action Summary. doc Page 5 NO: 13. 14. 'REQUEST INFOR~A TlON:' : , . .. REQUESTOR: Temecula Creek Inn LOCATION: Rainbow Canyon Road west of Pechanga Creek APN(s): 922-220-002, 003, 008, 031, and 922-230-002, 003, 004, 007 and 008 SIZE: 304.8 Ac REQUEST: From Open Space (OS) and Highway Tourist Commercial (HT) to Open . Space (OS), Highway Tourist Commercial (HT), and Low-Medium Density Residential (LM) DISCUSSION: Temecula Creek Inn is proposing expand the golf course resort facilities, add time share units, and construct several hundred additional single family residences, and designate this area as a future Specific Plan in the Land Use Element. Their plans also include reducing the number of holes from 27 to 18 to improve the overall quality of the golf experience. CAC RECOMMENDATION: The CAC did not support this change. REQUESTOR: Mel Malkoff for Rancho Community Church LOCATION: SR-79 South east of Jedediah Smith Road APN(s): 959-030-010 SIZE: 2.5 Ac REQUEST: From Very Low Density Residential (VL) to Professional Office (PO) DISCUSSION: In the process of obtaining drainage easements from the adjacent property owner, Rancho Community Church was forced or purchase the property at the northeast corner of SR-79 and Jedediah Smith Road. As a result, the Church would like to change the designation on this property to match the designation on the rest of their property. There is a concurrent proposal to include this property into the previously approved Planned Development Overlay. CAC RECOMMENDATION: The CAC did not support this change. R:\General Plan\Comp Plan Update\Community Advisory Committee\CAC Land Use Request Information - Action Summary.doc Page 6