HomeMy WebLinkAbout022321 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City
to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11].
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 23, 2021 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of
California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In
accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please
submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email
comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the
agenda must be received prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on
agenda items must be received prior to the time Public Comments for the agenda item is called. Email
comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to
hear public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern
public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via
email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the
meeting record.
CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council will meet
in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with
respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City
Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation
involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to
initiate litigation.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed
session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the potential sale of approximately
Page 1
City Council Agenda February 23, 2021
3.64 acres located at the northwest corner of Rancho California Road and Diaz Road, along with a
portion of adjacent right of way, owned by the City (APN 951-021-989). The parties to the negotiations
for the potential sale of the property are Alitra, LLC and the City of Temecula. Negotiators for the City
of Temecula are Aaron Adams, Greg Butler, Christine Damko, and Peter Thorson. Under negotiation
are the price and terms of payment for the potential sale of the property.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed
session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding four parcels of real property owned by
the City of Temecula, as successor to the assets of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula,
consisting of approximately 1 acre (APN 922-360-004, 005, 006 & 007) located on Main Street at
Mercedes Street in the City of Temecula. The parties to the negotiations for the potential sale of the
property are Marketplace Old Town, LLC (Truax Development) and the City of Temecula. Negotiators
for the City of Temecula are Aaron Adams, Greg Butler, and Luke Watson. Under negotiation are price
and terms for the sale of the property.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards
INVOCATION: Pastor William Rench of Calvary Baptist Church
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PRESENTATIONS
Presentation by David Showalter of Eide Bailly, LLP Regarding Comprehensive Annual Financial
Report
BOARD AND COMMISSION REPORTS
Old Town Local Review Board, Planning Commission, and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
Commission
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
Riverside County Sheriffs Department
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that
appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three
minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes.
For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important
notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A
total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports.
Page 2
City Council Agenda February 23, 2021
ANNUAL JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / OLD TOWN LOCAL REVIEW BOARD
Conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Old Town Local Review Board and
receive presentation regarding the same.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request
specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
Attachments: Agenda Report
2. Approve Action Minutes of February 9, 2021
Recommendation
That the City Council approve the action minutes of February 9, 2021.
Attachments: Action Minutes
3. Approve List of Demands
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution
List of Demands
4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2020
Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of
December 31, 2020.
Attachments: Agenda Report
Treasurer's Report
5. Receive and File the Police Services Joint Powers Authority Feasibility Assessment Prepared by
Citygate Associates (At the Request of Public Safety Ad -Hoc Subcommittee Mayor Edwards
and Mavor Pro Temnore Rahn)
Page 3
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Police Services Joint Powers
Authority (JPA) Feasibility Assessment prepared by Citygate Associates
dated February 2, 2021.
Attachments: Agenda Report
Feasibility Assessment
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
Page 4
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the
important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community
Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
6. Approve Action Minutes of February 9, 2021
Recommendation
That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of February 9,
2021.
Attachments: Action Minutes
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, March
9, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the
Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 5
City Council Agenda February 23, 2021
SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the
important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
SARDA CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Successor Agency to the
Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
7. Approve Action Minutes of February 9, 2021
Recommendation:
Attachments
That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of February 9,
2021.
Action Minutes
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on
Tuesday, March 9, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00
p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 6
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING
JOINT MEETING - TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY / CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER: Chair Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
TPFA PUBLIC COMMENT
A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items
that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to
three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five
minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the
important notice provided at the top of this agenda.
TPFA / COUNCIL BUSINESS
8. Approve and Adopt Resolutions of Intention to Form CFD 20-01, Authorize the Lew of Special
Taxes, Incur Bonded Indebtedness and Approve Related Documents and Agreements
Recommendation: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions
entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES
THEREIN - (HEIRLOOM FARMS)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING ITS
INTENTION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE
PROPOSED TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01 (HEIRLOOM
FARMS)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ACQUISITION
Page 7
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
AGREEMENT
Attachments: Agenda Report
Petition
TPFA Resolution - Establish Community Facilities District
TPFA Resolution - Incur Indebtedness
City Resolution - Community Facilities District
Joint Communitv Facilities Agreement
Acquisition Agreement
Draft Boundary Map
TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
TPFA ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will be held on Tuesday, March
9, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the
Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Page 8
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
COUNCIL / CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one
roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council /
Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate
action.
9. Approve Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments
Recommendation: That the City Council/TCSD Board of Directors adopt the following
resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO. CSD
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGETS
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2021-25 AND AMENDING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
Attachments: Agenda Report
Resolution - City
Exhibit A - General / Measure S Fund
Exhibit B - Special Revenue / Debt Service Funds
Exhibit C - Internal Service Funds
Resolution - Community Services District
Exhibit A - Community Services District Funds
Resolution - Capital Improvement Program
Exhibit 1 - Capital Improvement Program
COUNCIL / CSD ADJOURNMENT
Page 9
City Council Agenda February 23, 2021
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS
10. Discuss and Provide Direction Regarding an Alternate Facility to Serve as the Base of
Operations for the Sheriff's Deputies Assigned to Temecula, a Temecula Police Station within
the Cit. Limits At the Request of Council Member Stewart)
Recommendation:
Attachments
That the City Council:
1. Discuss the current Base of Operations, the Southwest Station, the
current deployment model, and the concept of shifting to a Base of
Operations within the City limits; and
2. Provide direction on exploring an alternate Base of Operations, if, after
discussion, the Council wishes to do so. Additionally, consider forming a
City Council ad -hoc subcommittee to guide the process.
Agenda Report
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS (Receive and File)
11. Community Development Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Planning Activity Report
12. Fire Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Monthly Report
13. Police Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
14. Public Works Department Monthly Report
Attachments: Agenda Report
Project Status Report
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
Page 10
City Council
Agenda February 23, 2021
ADJOURNMENT
The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, March 9, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a
Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at
41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material
available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any
item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing online at temeculaca.gov at least 72 hours prior to the
meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at
(951) 694 6444.
Page 11
Item No. 1
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the
Government Code.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of
the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to
the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of
the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 2
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
REGULAR MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 9, 2021 - 7:00 PM
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING
This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State
of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In
accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The
live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at
temeculaca.gov/tv.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please
submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email
comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the
agenda must be received prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on
agenda items must be received prior to the time Public Comments for the agenda item is called. Email
comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to hear
public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern
public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via
email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading
shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the
time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the
meeting record.
CLOSED SESSION: 6:00 P.M.
CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed
session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding four parcels of real property owned by
the City of Temecula, as successor to the assets of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula,
consisting of approximately 1 acre (APN: 922-360-004, 005, 006 & 007) located on Main Street at
Mercedes Street in the City of Temecula. The parties to the negotiations for the potential sale of the
property are Marketplace Old Town, LLC (Truax Development) and the City of Temecula. Negotiators
for the City of Temecula are Aaron Adams, Greg Butler, and Luke Watson. Under negotiation are price
and terms for the sale of the property.
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards
INVOCATION: Aaron Adam, City Manager
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
PUBLIC COMMENTS
The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on non-agendized item(s):
• Nydia Ibarra
• PJ in Temecula
• Jonathan Hawes
• Maria Pezer
• Kelsey Rosendale
• Treva Bennett
• Sarah Peyton
• Gordon Shipp
• Moira Johnson
• Melinda Reyes
• Maureen O'Sullivan
• Maria Gyori -
• Suzanne Lane
• Melissa Bourbonnais
• Bob Kowell
Temecula Resident
• Courtney Sheehan
• Desar6 Ferraro
• Jordan Bourbonnais
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
BOARD AND COMMISSION REPORTS
• Kevin Baeta
• Rick Reiss
• Christopher Bout
• Phebe O'Neill
• Laurel LaMont
• Tammy Acme
• Geor e Harris
Community Services Commission, Planning Commission, Public Traffic/Safety Commission
PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE)
ANNUAL JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL / COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
Conduct the annual joint meeting between the City Council and the Community Services Commission
and receive presentation regarding the same.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions
Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard
ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically
required by the Government Code.
2. Approve Action Minutes of January 26, 2021
Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of January 26, 2021.
3. Approve List of Demands
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-05
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
4. Adopt Resolution Reaffirming and Proclaiming the Existence of a Local Emergency Related to
the COVID-19 Virus Pandemic
Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-06
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA REAFFIRMING AND PROCLAIMING THE
EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO THE
COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC AND ISSUING CERTAIN ORDERS
FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY AFFAIRS DURING THE LOCAL
EMERGENCY
Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote
reflected unanimous approval with Alexander opposing.
5. Approve the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Agreement with Western Riverside
Council of Governments for the French Valley Parkway Phase III (Jefferson Ave to Ynez Rd)
Right -of -Way Phase, Project No. PW19-03
Recommendation:
RECESS:
That the City Council:
1. Approve the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)
Agreement to reimburse TUMF funds with Western Riverside Council
of Governments (WRCOG) for the French Valley Parkway Phase III
(Jefferson Ave to Ynez Rd) - Right -of -Way (ROW) Phase, Project No.
PW 19-03, and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement; and
2. Appropriate $1,500,000 in WRCOG TUMF funding to the French
Valley Parkway/I-15 Improvements, Phase III Capital Project.
At 8:20 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District
Meeting. At 8:22 PM, the City Council convened to the Successor Agency to the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency / City Council Joint Meeting. At 8:25 PM the City Council resumed with the
remainder of the City Council Agenda.
3
JOINT MEETING - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY / CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER at 8:22 PM: Chair Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA / COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
SARDA / COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
7. Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Purchase of Two Vacant Parcels - Assessor
Parcel Numbers 910-262-009 and 910-262-010
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT
ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AS BUYER, AND HOFF INVESTMENTS, L.P. AND PMD
INVESTMENTS, L.P. AS SELLERS (APNS 910-262-009 AND
910-262-010)
2. Appropriate $1,669,794 from the 2017B Housing Bond proceeds to
the French Valley Parkway/I-15, Phase III Capital Project; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute all necessary
documents, including those in substantially the form attached to the
Agenda Report, and take all necessary actions to effectuate the purchase
of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 910-262-009 and 910-262-010.
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
At 8:25 PM, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally
adjourned to Tuesday, February 23, 2021, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session
4
commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
BUSINESS
8. Review Fiscal Year 2021-22 Budget Policies and Priorities
Recommendation: That the City Council review the Fiscal Year 2021-22 budget policies
and priorities, and provide feedback on fiscal policy metrics.
Receive and file, no action.
CITY MANAGER REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:52 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 23, 2021, at 5:30
PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000
Main Street, Temecula, California.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Item No. 3
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands
PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review
and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached
claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or
authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies
and procedures.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution
2. List of Demands
RESOLUTION NO.2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND
DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in
the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are
hereby allowed in the amount of $6,905,858.83.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
01/28/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/04/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
02/04/2021 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
$ 5,454,699.53
908,871.41
542,287.89
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 2/23/2021 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 6,905,858.83
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 873,309.22
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
13,646.94
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
5,058.05
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
130,267.10
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS
687.40
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING
4,270,473.67
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
11,893.83
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
9,124.61
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND
692,919.29
300
INSURANCE FUND
44,282.84
305
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
2,335.71
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
94,395.32
325
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
30,394.43
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
7,018.66
335
SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT FUND
59,453.62
340
FACILITIES
17,094.89
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE
1,771.46
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,771.45
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
126.15
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,802.19
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,771.45
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,832.90
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II
1,771.40
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
2,877.14
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
2,243.71
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
1,849.49
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
385.04
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
2,154.47
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
1,270.76
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
929.93
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
7,805.14
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
185.31
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
559.29
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
113.90
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
5,116.44
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP.
1,294.97
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
841.00
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
584.65
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
1,239.97
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
112.30
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
5,230.03
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
2,801.87
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
8,554.14
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
11,632.57
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
216.59
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
861.34
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
6,726.78
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
2,916.02
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
113.62
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
521.87
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
9,634.74
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
155.28
700
CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45
11,440.00
6,363,570.94
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
001
GENERAL FUND
$ 296,371.18
140
COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
475.34
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
3,326.12
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
121,614.32
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING
1,313.98
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
524.20
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
2,553.28
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,739.18
305
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
1,455.97
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
36,177.70
330
SUPPORT SERVICES
3,250.08
340
FACILITIES
6,519.18
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE
104.85
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
104.79
474
AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
104.79
475
CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
131.57
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
104.79
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
158.34
478
CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II
104.78
501
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD
0.05
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
0.57
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
0.57
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
0.57
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
0.57
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
0.57
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
0.05
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
258.64
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
0.05
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
0.57
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
0.05
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
129.29
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP.
12.96
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
0.05
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
0.05
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
12.96
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
0.05
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
77.56
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
108.61
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
258.64
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
491.45
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
0.05
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
0.77
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
206.93
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
25.85
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
0.05
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
0.57
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
517.21
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
0.05
700
CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45
64,048.09
542,287.89
TOTAL BY FUND: $ 6,905,858.83
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
01/26/2021 11:19:06AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
500146 1/28/2021 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO
500147 1/28/2021 021376 BORUNDA, BRIANNA
500148 1/28/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
500149 1/28/2021 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT
INC
500150 1/28/2021 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES
500151 1/28/2021 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC
500152 1/28/2021 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT
SOLUTIONS
500153 1/28/2021 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC
500154 1/28/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
INC
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC
183.71
CTR
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: MPSC
34.75
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JRC
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: FOC
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: THEATE
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TPL
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: INFO TE
28.28
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TCC
28.28
416.42
REIMB: CAPIO 2021 WEBINAR
35.00
35.00
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK
976.39
MAINT: PW
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC
796.73
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD
339.62
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP PW
254.57
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC
232.06
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE
95.00
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F
86.16
2,780.53
DEC'20 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN:
1,250.00
1,250.00
WRKRS COM
ENG CONSULT SVCS: OVERLAND:
17,727.50
PW20-11
DEC ENG SVCS: SIDEWALK: 5TH ST: PW
3,423.35
ENG CONSULT SVCS: OVERLAND: PW2C
1,274.40
22,425.25
JAN LDSCP MAINT: 115/79S INTRCHG
8,550.00
MAINT
JAN OVERLAND EXTENSION PROJ LDS(
300.00
JAN LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
58,560.46
JAN LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS PW
56,831.22
JAN LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
40,678.18
JAN LDSCP MAINT SLOPES: PW
24,702.75
JAN LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS: PV
21,133.27
JAN LDSCP MAINT: CITY FACS
12,631.84
223,387.72
REPLACEMENT COPIERS:VARIOUS
59,453.62
59,453.62
DEPTS
REPLACEMENT TRAFFIC POLE: DE 495.71 495.71
PORTOLA
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING 681.42
GARAGE
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 60.94
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC 6.55 748.91
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
01/26/2021 11:19:06AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
500155 1/28/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J
DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
GRAPHIC DSGN - WEB COMICS: TCSD 900.00
Grand total for EFT UNION BANK:
900.00
311,893.16
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
01/26/2021 11:19:06AM CITY OF TEMECULA
10 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 311,893.16
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10334
1/11/2021
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
020792
CANVA.COM
AA MEMBERSHIP FEE FOR WEBSITE
10336
1/11/2021
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
000152
CALIF PARKS AND
PT PLAYGROUND SAFE COURSE:
RECREATION SOC, C P R S
FOX/LUDWIG
10341
1/6/2021
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
004822
RIVERSIDE TRANSIT AGENCY
MW BUS PASSES: HOMELESS
OUTREACH
10363
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-30-066-2889 30051 RANCHO
VISTA RD
10364
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-36-122-7820 31777 DE PORTOLA
RD
10365
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-25-350-5119 45602 REDHAWK
PKWY
10366
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-40-765-3021 28916 PUJOL ST
10367
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-40-765-3179 28922 PUJOL ST
10368
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-41-394-3267 46899 REDHAWK
PKWY
10369
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-29-479-2981 31454 TEMECULA
PKWY
10370
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-41-578-1897 32005 MURRIETA
HOT
10371
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-29-974-7899 26953 YNEZ RD
10372
1/19/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 32131 STA 95 S
LOOP
10373
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-30-608-9384 28582 HARVESTON
DR
10374
1/19/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 28816 PUJOL ST
Amount Paid Check Total
119.40 119.40
1.120.00 1.120.00
250.00
250.00
13.03
13.03
13.68
13.68
17.39
17.39
42.02
42.02
89.05
89.05
122.17
122.17
135.09
135.09
161.55
161.55
204.95
204.95
239.66
239.66
431.21
431.21
598.64
598.64
Page-1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10375
1/19/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
10376
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-02-351-5281 30875 RANCHO
VISTA
10377
1/19/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-05-791-8807 31587 TEMECULA
PKWY
10378
1/20/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
10379
1/20/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- LIBRARY
10380
1/20/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
10381
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS STA95 32131 S
DIST
LOOP RD
10382
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS STA95 32131 S
DIST
LOOP RD
10383
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS- 31991 RORIPAUGH
DIST
VALLEY
10384
1/21/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- CHILDREN'S
MUSEUM
10385
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS- 39656 DIEGO DR
DIST
10386
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS STA 95 32131 S
DIST
LOOP RD
10387
1/21/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATERS SVCS- 31991
DIST
RORIPAUGH VALLEY
10388
1/22/2021
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
VARI DEC WATER 3026656 31367 LA
DISTRICT
SERENA
10389
1/22/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-29-223-9571 30395 MURRIETA
HOT SPR
10390
1/22/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- EXTERNAL DMV
LINE
10391
1/22/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-31-419-2659 26706 YNEZ RD
Amount Paid Check Total
1,137.60
1,137.60
3,842.83
3,842.83
10,427.95
10,427.95
5.31
5.31
5.31
5.31
264.40
264.40
55.76
55.76
76.89
76.89
106.56
106.56
130.98
130.98
145.39
145.39
221.12
221.12
394.21
394.21
11,281.15
11,281.15
25.92
25.92
111.84
111.84
142.56
142.56
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10392
1/22/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-28-171-2620 40820
WINCHESTER RD
10393
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-30-099-3847 29721 RYECREST
10394
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-29-974-7568 26953 YNEZ RD
10395
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-33-237-4818 30499 RANCHO CAL
RD
10396
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-31-693-9784 26036 YNEZ RD
10397
1/25/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 42569
MARGARITA RD
10398
1/25/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 30875 RANCHO
VISTA RD
10399
1/25/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS 30600 PAUBA RD
10400
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-26-887-0789 40233 VILLAGE RD
10401
1/25/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-00-397-5059 33340 CAMINO
PIEDRA
10403
1/26/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
DEC 2-39-043-8521 29028 OLD TOWN
FRONT
10404
1/26/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS- MURRIETA HOT
DIST
SPRINGS
10405
1/26/2021
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
DEC 055-475-6169-5 32380 DEER
HOLLOW WAY
10406
1/26/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS- MURRIETA HOT
DIST
SPRINGS
10407
1/26/2021
002390
EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER
DEC WATER SVCS 39569 SERAPHINA
DIST
RD
10408
1/26/2021
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
DEC 015-575-0195-2 STA 92 32211
WOLF
10409
1/26/2021
001212
SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
DEC 091-085-1632-0 41951 MORAGA
RD
Amount Paid Check Total
410.81
410.81
12.62
12.62
117.26
117.26
125.86
125.86
398.15
398.15
598.64
598.64
598.64
598.64
609.14
609.14
1,937.05
1,937.05
6,760.57
6,760.57
12.99
12.99
27.88
27.88
48.88
48.88
99.51
99.51
202.76
202.76
599.39
599.39
1,966.52
1,966.52
Page:3
apChkLst
01/28/2021
1:24:40PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 4
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
10411
1/28/2021
001035
C RAND R INC
JUL- DEC'20 TRASH HAULING SVCS
4,269,691.44
4,269,691.44
204243
1/28/2021
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
457.50
457.50
MAINT
204244
1/28/2021
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY
-13.00
INC
BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY
160.36
BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY
14.13
BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY
14.13
175.62
204245
1/28/2021
000936
AMERICAN RED CROSS,
STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS:
864.00
HEALTH AND SAFETY SVCS
AQUATICS
STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: AQUATICS
416.00
1,280.00
204246
1/28/2021
021670
ANLIND OF TEMECULA INC,
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
732.61
TEMECULA HARLEY-DAVIDSON
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
252.14
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
758.87
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
269.16
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
237.24
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
229.01
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
270.91
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
144.90
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
237.24
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
1,042.81
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
970.90
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
377.43
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
513.80
VEHICLE MAINT & REPAIR: POLICE
270.91
6,307.93
204247
1/28/2021
000101
APPLE ONE INC
DEC TEMP HELP: COVID
8,311.30
8,311.30
SCREENINGS/FIN
204248
1/28/2021
013332
ARMSTRONG GARDEN
MISC PLANT/GARDEN SUPPLIES TVM
119.41
119.41
CENTERS INC
204249
1/28/2021
022025
ARTHER J GALLAGHER, RISK
INSURANCE CERT VERIFICATION:RISK
13,875.00
MANAGMENT SRVCS INC
MGMT
INSURANCE CERT VERIFICATION: RISK P
13,875.00
INSURANCE CERT VERIFICATION: RISK IN
13,875.00
41,625.00
204250
1/28/2021
018569
ARTINA GROUP INC THE, DBA
TAX FORMS: FINANCE DEPT.
211.30
211.30
TYLER BUSINESS FORMS
204251
1/28/2021
000475
B N I PUBLICATIONS INC
PUBLICATIONS: CIP, LAND DEV,
1,780.16
1,780.16
TRAFFIC
Page:4
apChkLst
01/28/2021
1:24:40PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204252
1/28/2021
011954
BAKER AND TAYLOR INC
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
258.79
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
20.11
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
18.97
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
48.22
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
759.61
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
58.51
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
82.90
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
254.72
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
131.16
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
87.90
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
92.00
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
269.33
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
20.04
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
112.73
2,214.99
204253
1/28/2021
004262
BIO TOX LABORATORIES
phlebotomy services: police—
2,203.00
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: POLICE
92.00
PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: POLICE
1,498.00
3,793.00
204254
1/28/2021
020754
CALIFORNIA LAND
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: MORENO, R.
260.00
260.00
SURVEYORS, ASSOCIATION
204255
1/28/2021
021461
CAMPBELL, BRITTANY
INSTRUCTOR: STUDENT -LED THTR
4,850.00
4,850.00
PROD 20/21
204256
1/28/2021
021349
CASA CENTER AGAINST
SART EXAMS: POLICE
1,200.00
SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV
CO
SART EXAMS: POLICE
800.00
SART EXAMS: POLICE
300.00
2,300.00
204257
1/28/2021
018828
CASC ENGINEERING AND,
ADD'L ENG SVCS: SOMMER'S BEND
854.00
854.00
CONSULTING INC
204258
1/28/2021
004462
CDW LLC, DBACDW
WI-FI EQUIPMENT:WI-FI GARDENS
5,407.53
GOVERNMENT LLC
Computer Iifecycle replacement: info tech
4,052.59
Computer Iifecycle replacement: info tech
26,341.84
COMPUTER LOAN PRGM: RIVERA, TINA
673.18
36,475.14
204259
1/28/2021
000442
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
ALARM SYS UPGRADES: VAR
2,502.00
2,502.00
LOCATIONS
204260
1/28/2021
014521
COSTAR REALTY
JAN WEB SUBSCRIPTION: ECO DEV
720.00
720.00
INFORMATION INC
204261
1/28/2021
017038
CPS HR CONSULTING
RECLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR
1,132.50
RECLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR
1,281.25
2,413.75
Page:5
apChkLst
01/28/2021
1:24:40PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204262
1/28/2021
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
DSGN SVCS: SAM HICKS PARK: PW
2,761.80
2,761.80
ASSOCIATES INC
204263
1/28/2021
002990
DAVID TURCH AND
NOV FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY
5,500.00
ASSOCIATES
MGR
DEC FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY M
5,500.00
OCT FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY M
5,500.00
16,500.00
204264
1/28/2021
012614
DBX INC
TRAFFIC SIGNAL EQUIP:TEM PKWY/LA
5,950.00
5,950.00
PAZ
204265
1/28/2021
021859
EXP US SERVICES INC
CONSULT SVCS: SANTA GERTRUDIS
1,797.86
1,797.86
CRK TRAIL
204266
1/28/2021
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
WEEKLY SVC CHARGE: SUPPORT
16.50
SVCS
WEEKLY SVC CHARGE: SUPPORT SVCS
16.50
33.00
204267
1/28/2021
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
5.44
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
76.13
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
23.40
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
29.09
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
21.75
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
28.77
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
10.60
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
11.69
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
25.28
KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103
29.77
261.92
204268
1/28/2021
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL- CASE#
29.40
29.40
1863175
204269
1/28/2021
019710
FU, JIMMY
PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: ECON DEV
300.00
300.00
204270
1/28/2021
021365
GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC
DEC CLAIM ADJUSTER SVCS:
1,317.00
1,317.00
EOC/RISK MGMT
204271
1/28/2021
022038
GERMKILL365 INC
REISSUE COVID SUPPLIES: WIPES:
391.50
391.50
PW
204272
1/28/2021
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE
26.09
INC
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE
9.24
35.33
204273
1/28/2021
022055
GREAT WESTERN
MISC PARK BENCH PARTS
593.63
593.63
RECREATION LLC, DBA GREAT
WESTERN RECREAT
204274
1/28/2021
000186
HANKS HARDWARE INC
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PW PARKS
346.49
346.49
Pagefi
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204275
1/28/2021
020698
HICKS AND HARTWICK INC
ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: PW
ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: PW
204276
1/28/2021
020673
INTEGRITY SUPPORT
Pre -Employment Screenings - HR
SERVICES INC, EMPLOYMENT
SCREENING RESO
204277
1/28/2021
000501
INTL INSTITUTE OF MUNICIPAL,
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: RAMIREZ, E.
CLERKS
204278
1/28/2021
013286
INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC
JAN ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT
204279
1/28/2021
017118
KRACH BREE B, DBA
ENGRAVING SVCS: CITY CLERK
TEMECULA TROPHY& DES
CREDIT
204280
1/28/2021
000210
LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
2021 MEMBERSHIP DUES: CITY OF
TEMECULA
204281
1/28/2021
000482
LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC
OCT-DEC GEOTECH SVC:BTRFLD
STG,PW15-11
204282
1/28/2021
022058
LOIZU, ROBIN, DBA 19TH HOLE
HPDP: CDBG/GOMEZ
GOLF CARTS
204283
1/28/2021
013982
M C I COMM SERVICE
JAN XXX-0346 GEN USAGE
JAN XXX-0714 GEN USAGE PD MALL ALARM
204284
1/28/2021
013650
MAMCO INC DBAALABBASI
DEC PRGS 9:BTRFLD STG RD,PW15-11
PH III
204285
1/28/2021
018675
MDG ASSOCIATES INC
DEC LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITOR
SVC: ADA
2020-21 CDBG Admin Srvcs
DEC CDBG PRGM ADMIN: COM DEV
204286
1/28/2021
018314
MICHAEL BAKER
DSGN SVCS: 1-15 / SR 79S: PW04-08
INTERNATIONAL
204287
1/28/2021
013443
MIDWEST TAPE LLC
BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY
204288
1/28/2021
019252
NATIONAL CHARITY LEAGUE
COMM SVC FUNDING: CITY CNCL
204289
1/28/2021
000209
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC,
EQPMNT REPAIR & MAIN - STATION 12
DBA CROP PRODUCTION
SRVCS
Amount Paid Check Total
1,485.00
705.00 2,190.00
30.00 30.00
140.00
140.00
300.00
300.00
119.08
-29.77
89.31
28,332.00
28,332.00
3,084.60
3,084.60
1,969.00
1,969.00
37.17
31.34
68.51
478,158.97
478,158.97
456.75
585.01
10,485.13
11,526.89
1,100.00
1,100.00
88.29
88.29
4,800.00
4,800.00
129.85
129.85
Page:?
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204290
1/28/2021
021121
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR
MEDICAL SCREENINGS: COVID-19
OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA
MEDICAL CTR
204291
1/28/2021
021998
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW
INC
STREETS
204292
1/28/2021
021735
ORANGE COUNTY YOUTH
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL
SPORTS, FRIDAY NIGHT
CANCELLED
LIGHTS FLAG
204293
1/28/2021
002734
P V P COMMUNICATIONS INC
MOTOR HELMETS: PD TRAFFIC
204294
1/28/2021
020544
PARKHOUSE TIRE SERVICE
TIRE SERVICE: PW STREET MAINT
INC
TIRE SERVICE: PW STREET MAINT
204295
1/28/2021
014379
PROFESSIONAL IMAGE
BANNERS: ECON DEV
ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME
SIGNSGRAPHICS
204296
1/28/2021
020127
QUINN COMPANY
GENERATOR MAINT SRVCS: STN 92
204297
1/28/2021
001364
R C P BLOCK & BRICK INC
MASONRY SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS
204298
1/28/2021
010777
RIVERSIDE CO EXECUTIVE
FY20/21 2Q SHELTER OPS: TEMECULA
OFFICE
FY20/21 3Q SHELTER OPS: TEMECULA
204299
1/28/2021
000411
RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD
NOV ENCROACHMENT PERMIT: MURR
CONTROLAND, WATER
CRK
CONSERVATION DIST
ADD'L DEPOSIT:MURR CRK ENCROACH
204300
1/28/2021
000278
SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE
DEC BID AD: PAVEMENT REHAB,
PW18-01
204301
1/28/2021
021309
SB&O INC
11/16-12/15 ENG,
SURVEY:SIDEWLKS,19-20
204302
1/28/2021
013695
SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA:
11/23, 12/7 DOC SHRED SRVCS:
SHRED -IT USA LLC
POLICE
12/28, 1/4 DOC SHRED SRVCS: CITY FAC
12/18, 1/5 DOC SHRED SRVCS: PD SBST
204303
1/28/2021
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
JAN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: STA 73
CONTROL INC
JAN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: WOLF CRK
JAN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: DUCK PON
204304
1/28/2021
008337
STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT
MISC SUPPLIES: TCSD
Amount Paid Check Total
52.00 52.00
1,931.27 1,931.27
2,146.00 2,146.00
794.52 794.52
229.60
365.60 595.20
960.00 960.00
780.00
780.00
41.05
41.05
55,914.00
56,181.00
112,095.00
184.18
1,000.00
1,184.18
319.28
319.28
97.50
97.50
42.24
194.92
42.24
279.40
68.00
49.00
49.00
166.00
43.50
43.50
Page:8
apChkLst
01/28/2021
1:24:40PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 9
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204305
1/28/2021
010169
UNITED TOWING SERVICE INC
TOWING SERVICES: TEM SHERIFF
200.00
200.00
204306
1/28/2021
007987
WALMART
MISC SUPPLIES: CRC
53.72
MISC SUPPLIES: CRC
132.18
185.90
204307
1/28/2021
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
CLEANING SUPPLIES: HARVESTON LK
1,266.67
1,266.67
PRK
204308
1/28/2021
020670
WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE
NOV SRVCS: MEASURE C ANALYSIS
1,700.00
LLC
2Q TCSD ADMIN-SERVICE LEVELS
9,691.84
2Q SPECIAL TAX ADMIN: CFDS
9,871.80
21,263.64
204309
1/28/2021
008668
WES FLOWERS
SUNSHINE FUND
99.49
SUNSHINE FUND
99.49
198.98
204310
1/28/2021
003730
WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC
12/1-15 TREE MAINT: PHEASANT RUN
547.00
12/16-31 TREE MAINT: HARVESTON LK P
2,531.10
3,078.10
Grand total for UNION BANK:
5,142,806.37
Page9
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
01/28/2021 1:24:40PM CITY OF TEMECULA
118 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 5,142,806.37
Page:10
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
02/02/2021 11:51:17AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK
Check # Date
Vendor
Description
500156 2/4/2021
009374
ALLEGRO MUSICAL VENTURES
PIANO TUNING/MAINT: THEATER
DBA, ALLEGRO PIANO
SERVICE
500157 2/4/2021
013950
AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT:
AQUATICS
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: AULD R
DEC DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TPL
JAN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TVM
500158 2/4/2021
010650
CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING &
PLUMBING SVCS: HARVESTON LAKE
HVAC INC
PARK
500159 2/4/2021
003945
DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL
TEMP FENCING: RR SPORTS PARK
SRVCS
PORTABLE RESTROOM: RED HAWK PKV
portable restroom & sink rental: police
500160 2/4/2021
004192
DOWNS ENERGY FUEL
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG
INSPECTORS
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI
FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT
500161 2/4/2021
002577
ENGINEERING RESOURCES
LAND ACQUISITION SVCS, PW-CIP
500162 2/4/2021
006914
INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT
DEC COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR:
SOLUTIONS
CITYWIDE
500163 2/4/2021
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
500164 2/4/2021
000944
MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC
TRAFFIC CABINET: MARGARITA/LA
SERENA
500165 2/4/2021
004043
MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY
LED LIGHTING FIXTURES:
INC
HARVESTON COMM
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN MAI
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
500166 2/4/2021
003591
RENES COMMERCIAL
PRE -EMERGENT: CITY OPEN ROW'S
MANAGEMENT
DEC MISC TRASH CLEANUP: CITY ROW!
Amount Paid Check Total
255.00 255.00
67.34
56.57
28.28
28.28 180.47
460.00 460.00
282.60
165.88
109.95 558.43
167.74
91.22
14.89 273.85
1,882.50 1,882.50
3,161.06 3,161.06
63.13
54.84 117.97
13,714.04 13,714.04
1,433.03
328.81
266.68
134.05
39.69
22.84 2,225.10
18,252.00
1,774.00 20,026.00
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
02/02/2021 11:51:17AM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
500167 2/4/2021 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND
GERSHON
500168 2/4/2021 009452 STRAWN, WILLIAM
(Continued)
Description
Amount Paid Check Total
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
21,932.96
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
9,035.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
2,223.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
2,166.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
1,694.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
1,568.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
1,428.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
708.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
513.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
396.00
DEC 2020 LEGAL SERVICES
264.00 41,927.96
REIMB:EQUIPMENT FOR THEATER 65.24 65.24
Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 84,847.62
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
02/02/2021 11:51:17AM CITY OF TEMECULA
13 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 84,847.62
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10337
1/11/2021
006887
UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
012915
LUCILLE'S BBC
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTG
12/08
000210
LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES
RO SEMINAR: NEW LAWS/ELECTIONS:
CLERK
006692
SAM'S CLUB
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY COUNCIL MTGS
010514
CAMPINI'S ITALIAN DELI
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY COUNCIL MTG:
11/19
008956
PANERA BREAD
RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY COUNCIL MTG
003964
OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS
RO MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY CLERK
DIV
021177
NOTHING BUNDT CAKES
RO RFRSHMNTS: SWEARING IN NEW
CNCL
021453
SACRAMENTO BEE
RO SUBSCRIPTION: ONLINE DIGITAL
SUBSCRIP
10402
1/29/2021
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
VARI DEC WATER 3001042 30600
DISTRICT
PAUBA RD
10410
1/27/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 41000 MAIN ST
10412
1/28/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS MPSC SKATE
PARK
10413
1/28/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
10414
1/28/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 32380 DEER
HOLLOW WAY
10415
1/29/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 28922 PUJOL ST
10416
1/29/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS- 41845 6TH ST
10417
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-40-576-0232 44173 BUTTERFIELD
STG
10418
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-33-357-5785 44747 REDHAWK
PKWY
10419
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-28-331-4847 32805 PAUBA RD
10420
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-41-072-5394 29429 TEMECULA
PKWY
Amount Paid Check Total
326.88
300.00
65.24
105.95
296.03
20.65
220.00
12.99 1,347.74
11,486.87 11,486.87
49.77 49.77
197.35 197.35
295.98 295.98
598.64 598.64
598.64
598.64
598.64
598.64
18.72
18.72
29.95 29.95
86.70 86.70
90.45 90.45
Page:1
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10421
2/1/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- TCC
10422
2/1/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- MPSC
10423
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-30-296-9522 46679 PRIMROSE
AVE
10424
2/1/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-34-624-4452 STA 95 32131 S
LOOP
10425
2/1/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
10426
2/1/2021
018858
FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC
JAN INTERNET SVCS- CITY HALL
10427
2/4/2021
010349
CALIF DEPT OF CHILD
SUPPORT PAYMENT
SUPPORT
10428
2/4/2021
017429
COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA
FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT
THE ADVANTAGE GROUP
10429
2/4/2021
021301
I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN
106474
PAYMENT
10430
2/4/2021
000194
I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN
ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457
303355
PAYMENT
10431
2/4/2021
000444
INSTATAX (EDD)
STATE TAXES PAYMENT
10432
2/4/2021
000283
INSTATAX (IRS)
FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT
10433
2/4/2021
001065
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT
SOLUTION
10434
2/4/2021
019088
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
10435
2/4/2021
000389
NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT
OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT
SOLUTION
PAYMENT
10436
2/4/2021
000245
PERS - HEALTH INSUR
PERS HEALTH PAYMENT
PREMIUM
PERS HEALTH PAYMENT
10437
2/4/2021
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT
RETIREMENT)
Amount Paid Check Total
120.98
120.98
150.98
150.98
521.34
521.34
1,354.92
1,354.92
2,820.18
2,820.18
5,494.09
5,494.09
899.07
899.07
19,689.61
19,689.61
1,134.62
1,134.62
15,810.98
15,810.98
26,107.20
26,107.20
86,647.55
86,647.55
12,765.57
12,765.57
305.68
305.68
1,919.68
1,919.68
0.00
141,157.49
141,157.49
111,498.82
111,498.82
Paget
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
10438
2/4/2021
000246
PERS (EMPLOYEES'
PIERS - REPLACEMENT BENEFIT
RETIREMENT)
CONTRIBUTION
10439
2/2/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-35-164-3242 44270 MEADOWS
PKWY
10440
2/2/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-35-164-3663 42335 MEADOWS
PKWY
10441
2/2/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-35-164-3515 32932 LEENA WAY
10442
2/2/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-35-164-3770 43487 BUTTERFIELD
STG
10443
2/2/2021
001986
MUZAK LLC
FEB DISH NETWORK 41952 6TH ST
10444
2/2/2021
001986
MUZAK LLC
FEB DISH NETWORK STA 95 32131
10445
2/2/2021
001986
MUZAK LLC
FEB DISH NETWORK 43230 BUS PARK
DR
10446
2/2/2021
010276
TIME WARNER CABLE
JAN INTERNET SVCS 29119
MARGARITA RD
204311
2/4/2021
013387
ADAME LANDSCAPE INC, DBA
JAN CLEANING SRVCS: PRKG
SWEEPING UNLIMITED
STRUCTURE
204312
2/4/2021
019307
ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: STREET
SMOG
MAINT: PW
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: STREET MAINT:
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: FIRE VEHICLES
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: FIRE VEHICLES
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS & FAC
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: STREETS MAIN"
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: POLICE
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS: PW
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: STREET MAINT:
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS: PW
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: POLICE
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS: PW
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS: PW
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: STREET MAINT:
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: FIRE VEHICLES
ANNUAL SMOG CHECK: PARKS & FACILI
Amount Paid Check Total
1,061.07
1,061.07
13.68
13.68
13.82
13.82
14.02
14.02
15.53
15.53
56.10
56.10
155.08
155.08
166.27
166.27
1,655.67
1,655.67
540.00
540.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
45.00
720.00
Page:3
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK
Check # Date Vendor
(Continued)
Description
204313
2/4/2021
003951
ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MAINT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
204314
2/4/2021
010983
ALL AMERICAN SERVICE, AND
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
SUPPLIES
MAINT
204315
2/4/2021
007282
AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES
SUPPLIES - CHIEF/BC
INC
MISC. SUPPLIES: CRC
MISC. SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS
204316
2/4/2021
004240
AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE
AFN
DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE
FEB STAND BY FEE: POLICE
204317
2/4/2021
000101
APPLE ONE INC
JAN TEMP HELP: FINANCE DEPT
204318
2/4/2021
001445
ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF
COMM SVC FUNDING: CITY CNCL
TEMECULA, VALLEY
204319 2/4/2021 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC
204320 2/4/2021 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL
PRODUCTS INC
204321 2/4/2021 014284 BLAKELYS TRUCK SERVICE,
AKA DONALD W BLAKELY
204322 2/4/2021 011348 BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS
LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER
SOFT
204323 2/4/2021 021588 BRAUN PETER, DBA
TEMECULA PLANTSCAPE
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY
EMBROIDERY SVCS:BLDG & SAFETY
UNIFORMS
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET
MAINT
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET �
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET �
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET �
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET �
VEHICLE/EQUIP REPAIRS: PW STREET �
FEB WTR TANK FILTER REPL: STA 73
FEB PLANTSCAPE SVCS: CIVIC CTR
FEB PLANTSCAPE SVCS: TPL
Amount Paid
507.52
562.46
105.06
105.48
167.49
149.73
175.35
116.90
1,339.00
4,627.35
5,000.00
40.22
82.73
922.14
-21.10
33.92
41.37
483.96
60.79
-9.54
43.50
90.00
165.32
171.00
162.00
90.00
127.03
279.96
500.00
200.00
Check Total
1,069.98
105.06
422.70
1,631.25
4,627.35
5,000.00
1,634.49
43.50
805.35
279.96
700.00
Page:4
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204324
2/4/2021
021502
BUCHER, BRET PHILLIP
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
204325
2/4/2021
001035
C RAND R INC
TRASH HAULING SVCS: FIRE STA73
204326
2/4/2021
003138
CAL MAT, DBA VULCAN
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET
MATERIALS CO
MAINT
ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
204327
2/4/2021
020995
CALAHAN, RICHARD
REIMB: UNIFORMS: BLDG & SAFETY
204328
2/4/2021
001054
CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS,
REGIST. WEBINAR: LA RUE, JESSE
(CALBO)
204329
2/4/2021
004248
CALIF DEPT OF
DEC BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS:
JUSTICE-ACCTING
PD
204330
2/4/2021
004971
CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES
JAN 14 COPIER LEASE - CIVIC CTR
INC
204331
2/4/2021
004931
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
TITLE REPORT SVCS: PW04-08
204332
2/4/2021
005417
CINTAS PROTECTION NO 2,
First Aid Kit Maintenance—
CINTAS FIRE 636525
204333
2/4/2021
000442
COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS
MISC ALARM SVC: IWTCM
MISC ALARM SVC: CIVIC CTR
204334
2/4/2021
017038
CPS HR CONSULTING
RECLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR
204335
2/4/2021
020105
CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL
TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS
CREDIT
204336
2/4/2021
004194
D L T SOLUTIONS, LLC
ENG & CONS COLLECTION SW
RENEWAL: PW
204337
2/4/2021
001233
DANS FEED AND SEED INC
MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW
204338
2/4/2021
012600
DAVID EVANS AND
DEC DSGN SVCS: RRSP EXPANSION
ASSOCIATES INC
18-03
DEC CONST BID SUPPOT: SANTA GERTF
DEC DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ PW17-:
DEC DSGN SVCS: PW17-29 WTR CONVE
AUG DSGN SVCS: TPL PARKING PH II PV
204339
2/4/2021
020360
DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP
CEQAANALYSIS: SERAPHINA
Amount Paid Check Total
455.00
434.00
889.00
1,092.37
1,092.37
345.77
199.00
544.77
97.88
97.88
70.00 70.00
1.155.00 1.155.00
671.56 671.56
2,400.00 2,400.00
62.80 62.80
75.00
508.95 583.95
1,531.25 1,531.25
235.20
-58.80 176.40
8,195.48 8,195.48
37.31 37.31
2,765.00
10, 591.00
10, 664.69
4,994.52
1,700.00 30,715.21
1.125.21 1.125.21
Page:5
apChkLst
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204340
2/4/2021
019720
DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES
FEB WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK
INC
PN D/HARV.
204341
2/4/2021
020904
ECONOMIC ALTERNATIVES INC
FEB CONDENSER WTR SYS PM: CIVIC
CTR
204342
2/4/2021
009618
ENNIS FLINT INC
MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT
204343
2/4/2021
017432
EYEMED VISION CARE
VISION PLAN PAYMENT
204344
2/4/2021
009953
FEDERAL CLEANING
FEB JANITORIAL SRVCS: POLICE MALL
CONTRACTORS, DBA FEDERAL
OFC
BLDG SERVICES
204345
2/4/2021
003747
FINE ARTS NETWORK AKA
COMM SVC FUNDING: CITY CNCL
THEATRE, CO AND BALLET
THEATER
204346
2/4/2021
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
SUPPORT PAYMENT
204347
2/4/2021
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
CUMBERBATCH, JAMAL - CASE#
1863175
204348
2/4/2021
000177
GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE
INC
EMERGENCY SUPPLIES: COVID-19: TCS
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAIN'
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAIN'
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC
MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MPSC: TCSD
204349
2/4/2021
000175
GOVERNMENT FINANCE
3/1/21-2/28/22 MBRSHP: JH/RG/PH
OFFICERS, ASSOCIATION,
GFOA
204350 2/4/2021 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET
MAINT: PW
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER
FIRE EXTINGUISHERS: VARI DEPTS
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM
MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC
MISC HDWR SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT
204351 2/4/2021 020193 HD SUPPLY CONSTR SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW
LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP
CONSTR
MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW
Amount Paid
6,969.00
525.00
3,295.45
1,725.78
1,167.06
2,500.00
100.00
58.80
66.96
439.95
67.82
87.41
146.65
299.32
840.00
115.83
33.22
149.72
496.75
14.11
12.21
314.65
456.91
356.65
978.73
Page: 6
Check Total
6,969.00
525.00
3,295.45
1,725.78
1,167.06
2,500.00
100.00
58.80
1,108.11
840.00
1,593.40
1,335.38
Page6
apChkLst
02/04/2021
2:25:27PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 7
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204352
2/4/2021
013749
HELIXSTORM INC
FIREWALLANNUAL SUB
28,780.00
28,780.00
RENEWAL:INFO TECH
204353
2/4/2021
003198
HOME DEPOT
MISC SUPPLIES: FOC
27.77
MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER
60.16
Misc tools: pw facilities civic center
117.34
205.27
204354
2/4/2021
022056
IDETAIL SUPPLY CO
ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES - BC
36.89
36.89
204355
2/4/2021
020673
INTEGRITY SUPPORT
Pre -Employment Screenings - HR
177.41
177.41
SERVICES INC, EMPLOYMENT
SCREENING RESO
204356
2/4/2021
012883
JACOB'S HOUSE INC
EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS
40.00
40.00
PAYMENT
204357
2/4/2021
012285
JOHNSTONE SUPPLY
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
1,518.36
MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR
81.46
1,599.82
204358
2/4/2021
021896
JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA
BUSINESS CARD PRINTING - BATT 15
81.56
MINUTEMAN PRESS
Business Cards - Planning
145.62
COUNCIL MEMBER BUS CARDS: CIT CNI
435.54
662.72
204359
2/4/2021
001091
KEYSER MARSTON
DEC ON CALL CONSULTANT SVCS:
2,190.00
2,190.00
ASSOCIATES INC
PLANNING
204360
2/4/2021
019691
L C PAVING AND SEALING INC
REL STP NTC: PECHANGA PKWY:
66,568.46
66,568.46
PW15-14
204361
2/4/2021
020222
LANDSCAPE STRUCTURES
PLAYGROUND EQUIP: SAM HICKS
4,993.00
4,993.00
INC.
PARK 20-03
204362
2/4/2021
000482
LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC
Geotech services PA19-0940 Solana
2,200.00
MATLS TESTING SVCS, RRSP PUMP THE
3,865.10
GEOTEC REVIEW: TEMECULA VILLAGE:
3,500.00
9,565.10
204363
2/4/2021
002634
LITELINES INC
LED REPLACEMENT LAMPS: PW
29,606.10
29,606.10
204364
2/4/2021
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET
837.22
ATHACO INC
MAINT
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: STREET MAINT:
641.11
SIGNS & SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW
549.20
CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MP
67.82
MISC SIGN POSTS & SUPPLIES: PARKS
645.85
2,741.20
204365
2/4/2021
020302
MARIS IMAGING SOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT IMAGING SVCS: CITY
15,623.67
15,623.67
LLC
CLERK
Page:?
apChkLst
02/04/2021
2:25:27PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 8
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204366
2/4/2021
018675
MDG ASSOCIATES INC
DEC LABOR COMPLIANCE SVCS:
71.25
71.25
PW18-16
204368
2/4/2021
003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE
DENTAL PAYMENT
12,309.33
12,309.33
COMPANY
204369
2/4/2021
022061
MEZA, REYNA
REFUND: COMMUNITY CENTER
1,450.00
1,450.00
RENTAL
204370
2/4/2021
018314
MICHAEL BAKER
DEC ENG & SURVEY SVCS - PW17-28
15,215.00
15,215.00
INTERNATIONAL
204371
2/4/2021
013443
MIDWEST TAPE LLC
BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY
139.49
139.49
204372
2/4/2021
002925
NAPAAUTO PARTS
AUTO PARTS & SUPPLIES: STA 95
24.99
24.99
204373
2/4/2021
018099
NATIONAL SAFETY
DOT TESTING: HR
204.95
204.95
COMPLIANCE INC
204374
2/4/2021
001323
NESTLE WATERS NORTH
DEC WTR DLVRY SVCS: FOC
117.99
AMERICA, DBA
READYREFRESH
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: MRC
8.69
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: PBSP
17.22
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: SKATE PAI
9.15
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: TESC POC
16.30
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: HELP CTR
33.08
JAN WATER DELIVERY SVCS: HELP CTR
28.99
231.42
204375
2/4/2021
000209
NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC,
EQUIPMENT REPAIR & MAINT: STA 73
170.59
170.59
DBA CROP PRODUCTION
SRVCS
204376
2/4/2021
009337
NV5 INC
DEC PROJ MGT SVCS:MRC, PW17-21
2,722.50
2,722.50
204377
2/4/2021
021121
OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR
MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR
208.00
OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA
MEDICAL CTR
MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR
156.00
364.00
204378
2/4/2021
021998
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW
79.81
INC
PARKS
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW STREEI
111.05
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW STREEI
1,931.27
2,122.13
204379
2/4/2021
021998
OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE
CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: FIRE
38.45
38.45
INC
PREV
204380
2/4/2021
019474
OUR NICHOLAS FOUNDATION
FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING
5,000.00
5,000.00
Page:8
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204381
2/4/2021
016585
PACIFIC PLAY SYSTEMS INC
MISC PLAYGROUND PARTS: PW
PARKS
204382
2/4/2021
020544
PARKHOUSE TIRE SERVICE
VEHICLE REPAIR & MAINT: STA 95
INC
204383
2/4/2021
005820
PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES
PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT
INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD
204384
2/4/2021
012904
PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN
JAN PLAN REVIEW SRVCS: FIRE PREV
AND, CONSULTING
204385
2/4/2021
005075
PRUDENTIAL OVERALL
JAN UNIFORM SRVCS: PW STREET
SUPPLY
MAINT
204386
2/4/2021
021026
QUESTICA LTD
QTRLY REPORTS/ANALYSIS: FINANCE
BUDGET SOLFTWARE & REPORTS: FIND
204387
2/4/2021
020127
QUINN COMPANY
GENERATOR PREV MAINT: CRC
204388
2/4/2021
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER
DEC WATER SVCS 3094865 TEE DR
DISTRICT
204389
2/4/2021
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND,
SCH2O20059004:TRFF
RECORDER
SGNL/PRK&RIDE, 18-11
204390
2/4/2021
001592
RIVERSIDE CO INFO
DEC EMERG RADIO RENTAL: POLICE
TECHNOLOGY
204391
2/4/2021
001365
RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF,
RENEW PERMIT: FOC
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
DEPT
RENEW PERMIT: MARG PARK SPLASH P
204392
2/4/2021
016439
ROTARY CLUB OF TEMECULA,
FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING
FOUNDATION ACCOUNT
204393
2/4/2021
021964
RUSSELL SIGLER INC, DBA
MISC PARTS FOR HVAC UNITS: CIVIC
SIGLER WHOLESALE DIST
CTR
MISC PARTS FOR HVAC UNITS: CIVIC Cl
MISC PARTS FOR HVAC UNITS: CIVIC Cl
MISC PARTS FOR HVAC UNITS: CIVIC Cl
204394
2/4/2021
004274
SAFE AND SECURE
LOCKSMITH SERVICES: PARKS
LOCKSMITH SRVC
204395
2/4/2021
013911
SANTA ROSA PLATEAU
FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING
NATURE, EDUCATION
FOUNDATION
Amount Paid Check Total
4,435.00
4,435.00
295.30
295.30
191.35
191.35
10,004.50
10,004.50
204.08
204.08
4,600.00
850.00
5,450.00
368.50
368.50
283.86
283.86
73.50
73.50
2,159.91
2,159.91
1,747.00
406.00
2,153.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
104.18
235.13
100.23
110.57
550.11
54.38
54.38
2,500.00
2,500.00
Page9
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
204396
2/4/2021
017699
SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M
COUNCIL/CMO PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS
PRESTON
204397
2/4/2021
013482
SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES
JAN AFTER HRS SECURITY: PUMP
INC, DBA BAS SECURITY
TRACK
204398
2/4/2021
000645
SMARTAND FINAL INC
SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES
204399
2/4/2021
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
JAN 2-01-202-7330 VARIOUS
LOCATIONS
204400
2/4/2021
002503
SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY,
FY20/21 FLAT FEE -LAST F-YR
MANAGEMENT DISTRICT
EMISSIONS:TVE
204401
2/4/2021
000519
SOUTH COUNTY PEST
EMERG PEST CONTROL SRVCS:
CONTROL INC
SKATE PARK
204402
2/4/2021
012652
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA,
FEB GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,2593,9306
TELEPHONE COMPANY
204405
2/4/2021
007762
STANDARD INSURANCE
BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT
COMPANY
204406
2/4/2021
012723
STANDARD INSURANCE
VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE
COMPANY
PAYMENT
204407
2/4/2021
017814
STC TRAFFIC INC
DEC TRAFF SGNL SYS UPGRADE:HSIP
CYCLE 9
OCT PLN REVIEW & INSPECTION: PW Cl
204408
2/4/2021
001547
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT
204409
2/4/2021
015412
TEMECULA MOUNTAIN LIONS,
REFUND: SOCCER FIELD RENTAL
RUGBY CLUB
CANCELLED
204410
2/4/2021
003941
TEMECULA WINNELSON
PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS
COMPANY
PARKS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS
PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS
AUTOMATIC FAUCETS: CRC
204411
2/4/2021
003849
TERRYBERRY COMPANY
SERVICE AWARDS: HR
204412
2/4/2021
007824
THESSALONIKA FAMILY
FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING
SERVICES
204413
2/4/2021
021580
TOWNSEND PUBLIC AFFAIRS
FEB CONSULTING SRVCS: CITY
INC
CLERK
Amount Paid Check Total
600.00
600.00
4,424.00
4,424.00
91.71
91.71
687.40
687.40
136.40
136.40
94.00
94.00
613.49
613.49
8,689.71
8,689.71
1,473.37
1,473.37
160.00
4,250.00
4,410.00
4,942.22
4,942.22
96.00
96.00
457.78
351.28
24.93
14.66
848.65
126.82
126.82
5,000.00
5,000.00
6,000.00
6,000.00
Page:10
apChkLst
02/04/2021
2:25:27PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 11
Bank:
union UNION BANK
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
204414
2/4/2021
020963
UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: PW
24.00
SPA LLC
FACS
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: B&S
16.00
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: CODE
8.00
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: FIRE
112.00
OCT VEH DETAILING SRVCS: PW CIP
4.00
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: PW R
20.00
OCT VEH DETAILING SRVCS: PW STREE
12.00
OCT-NOV VEH DETAILING SRVCS: TCSD
8.00
204.00
204415
2/4/2021
021957
US AIR CONDITIONING,
HVAC REPAIR PARTS: STA 73
24.75
24.75
DISTRIBUTORS LLC
204416
2/4/2021
001890
VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC
DOOR REPAIR: STA 12
673.00
AUTOMATIC GATE REPAIR: STA92
1,670.43
DOOR PREV MAINT: TVE2
496.40
2,839.83
204417
2/4/2021
016676
WAVES PROJECT INC
FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING
5,000.00
5,000.00
204418
2/4/2021
001342
WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC
EMERGENCY SUPPLIES: COVID-19
2,854.69
2,854.69
204419
2/4/2021
021024
YANES BLANCAA, DBA DE
AUG LDSCP PLN CK & INSPECTION:
3,065.00
3,065.00
GANGE CONSULTING
PLNG
204420
2/4/2021
016305
YONKER, JOHN
REIMB: UNIFORM SHIRTS
78.26
78.26
1002069
2/3/2021
022062
MOHNS, JOHN
REFUND: PAID INCORRECT BUSINESS
36.00
36.00
LICENSE
1002070
2/3/2021
022063
VASQUEZ, MARIA SHARMINE
REFUND: BUSINESS LICENSE
15.00
15.00
PENALTY FEE
Grand total for UNION BANK: 824,023.79
Page:11
apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12
02/04/2021 2:25:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA
147 checks in this report.
Grand Total All Checks: 824,023.79
Page:12
Item No. 4
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Approve the City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2020
PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report
as of December 31, 2020.
BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the
City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively.
Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the
next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund
(LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust
statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information.
The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and
Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of December 31, 2020.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of December 31, 2020
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Summary
December 31, 2020
City of Temecula
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
(951)694-6430
Par
Market
Book
% of
Days to
YTM
YTM
Investments
Value
Value
Value
Portfolio
Term
Maturity
360 Equiv.
365 Equiv.
Managed Pool Accounts
36,823,123.67
36,823,123.67
36,823,123.67
25.29
1
1
0.186
0.189
Retention Escrow Account
736,666.53
736,666.53
736,666.53
0.51
1
1
0.062
0.063
Letter of Credit
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.00
1
1
0.000
0.000
Trust Accounts
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
11.00
1
1
6.372
6.460
Local Agency Investment Funds
79,019,611.96
79,199,090.63
79,019,611.96
54.27
1
1
0.533
0.540
Federal Agency Callable Securities
6,000,000.00
6,035,590.00
6,000,000.00
4.12
1,567
872
1.733
1.757
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
7,000,000.00
7,120,270.00
7,000,000.00
4.81
1,122
455
2.001
2.029
145,600,407.47
145,935,746.14
145,600,407.47
100.00%
119
59
1.205
1.222
Investments
Cash
Passbook/Checking
3,984,577.69
3,984,577.69
3,984,577.69
1
1
0.000
0.000
(not included in yield calculations)
Total Cash and Investments
149,584,985.16
149,920,323.83
149,584,985.16
119
59
1.205
1.222
Total Earnings December 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date
Current Year 141,047.72 1,928,774.28
Average Daily Balance 149,755,606.19 149,145,693.73
Effective Rate of Return 1.11% 2.57%
Reporting period 12/01/2020-12/31/2020 Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET_MTH: 02/09/2021 12:16 NL! CP
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:16 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management Page 1
Portfolio Details - Investments
December 31, 2020
Average Purchas Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance a Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
233358001-6
01-2 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
5,511.01
5,511.01
5,511.01
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
233358006-6
01-2 REF RES
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
503,224.54
503,224.54
503,224.54
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
233358000-6
01-2 REF ST
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
115,828.38
115,828.38
115,828.38
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
276213009-6
03-02 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl 07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
276213008-6
03-02 IMPR
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
978.88
978.88
978.88
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
276213006-6
03-02 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
741,057.06
741,057.06
741,057.06
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
164741002-6
03-03 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl 07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
164741008-6
03-03IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
194,080.71
194,080.71
194,080.71
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
164741006-6
03-03RES
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
409.13
409.13
409.13
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
164741000-6
03-03SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
217,397.73
217,397.73
217,397.73
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
164742002-6
03-06 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
1.630
1.608
1.630 1
164742000-6
03-06SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
19,222.46
19,222.46
19,222.46
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
229462007-6
03-1 2012 RF
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
3.80
3.80
3.80
0.000
0.000 1
229462002--6
03-1 BOND FD
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
2,193.53
2,193.53
2,193.53
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
229462009-6
03-1 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
229462006-6
03-1 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
17,604.13
17,604.13
17,604.13
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
229462000-6
03-1 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
125,985.92
125,985.92
125,985.92
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
94669921-6
03-1ACQ11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870 1
94669911-6
03-1ACQA11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl 07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669917-6
03-1 RES
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl 07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669916-6
03-1 RESB11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669000-6
03-1 SPTAX11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
276213002-6
03-2 REFU
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.80
0.80
0.80
0.000
0.000 1
276213000-6
03-2 SPEC
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
99,326.53
99,326.53
99,326.53
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
94686001-6
03-4ADMIN11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.060
0.059
0.060 1
94686005-6
03-4PREP11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.070
0.069
0.070 1
94686000-6
03-4RED11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.050
0.049
0.050 1
94686006-6
03-4RES11
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.060
0.059
0.060 1
276213022-6
16-01 BOND F
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
3.23
3.23
3.23
0.000
0.000 1
276213023-6
16-01 CAPINT
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.870
0.858
0.870 1
276213029-6
16-01 COI
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl 07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
276213028-6
16-01 IMP
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
6,722,410.19
6,722,410.19
6,722,410.19
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
276213026-6
16-01 RESERV
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
3,153,472.58
3,153,472.58
3,153,472.58
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
276213020-6
16-01 SPECF
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
309,261.10
309,261.10
309,261.10
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
218848001-6
2017A&B INT
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.000
0.000 1
218848008-6
2017ABPRIORP
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
17,954.93
17,954.93
17,954.93
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
218848013-2
2017B COI
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
218848000-6
2017B IDS
First Amer Govt Oblig
Fund
Cl
1.20
1.20
1.20
0.000
0.000 1
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 02/09/2021 12:33 NL! CP
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:33
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Report Ver. 7.3.6.1
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management Page 2
Portfolio Details - Investments
December 31, 2020
Average Purchas Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity
CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance a Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date
Managed Pool Accounts
218848002-6
2017B PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
982.21
982.21
982.21
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
218848009-6
2017B_PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
13,120,150.84
13,120,150.84
13,120,150.84
0.030
0.030
0.030 1
233358009-6
233358009-6
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94434160-6
RDA-02INT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94434161-6
RDA-02PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
107886000-6
RDA-06AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
107886001-6
RDA06APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
107886010-6
RDA06BINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
107886011-6
RDA06BPRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.680
0.671
0.680 1
107886016-6
RDA06BRES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940 1
107886020-6
RDA071NT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
107886021-6
RDA07PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.930
0.917
0.930 1
107886028-6
RDA07PROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940 1
107886026-6
RDA07RES
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.940
0.927
0.940 1
136343008-6
RDA10APROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
136343018-6
RDA10BPROJ
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
136343000-6
RDA10INT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
136343001-6
RDA10PRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
136343006-6
RDA10RSRV
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
146161000-6
RDA11AINT
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
146161001-6
RDA11APRIN
First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669902-3
03-1 BOND3
First American Treasury
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94434160-1
RDA 02 INT1
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010 1
94434161-2
RDA 02 PRIN2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010 1
136343018-2
RDA 10B CIP2
First American Treasury
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.010
0.010
0.010 1
146161008-3
RDA11APROJ
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.800
0.789
0.800 1
146161006-3
RDA11ARSRV
Federated Institutional Tax Fr
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669921-5
03-01 ACQ11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
94669911-5
03-01 ACQA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
94669917-5
03-01 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94669906-5
03-01 RESA11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.001
0.001
0.001 1
94669916-5
03-01 RESB11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
94669000-5
03-01 SPTAXI1
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
164742006-5
03-06 RES
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
164742000-5
03-06 SPEC
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
94669902-5
03-1bond fd
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
94686001-5
03-4 ADMINI1
Federated Tax Free Obligations
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250 1
94686005-5
03-4 PREP11
Federated Tax Free Obligations
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000 1
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 02/09/2021 12:33 NL! CP
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:33
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Managed Pool Accounts
94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations
94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fu
276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fu
164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fu
94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fu
107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fu
229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK
233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury
Subtotal and Average
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
December 31, 2020
Average Purchas
Balance a Par Value Market Value
0.00
0.00
n 0.00
0.00
n 8,776,612.65
8,776,612.65
n 331,277.56
331,277.56
n 812,685.42
812,685.42
n 0.00
0.00
n 0.00
0.00
n 0.00
0.00
n 1,535,135.97
1,535,135.97
n 0.00
0.00
n 0.00
0.00
n 0.00
0.00
350.93
350.93
0.00
0.00
37,031,512.50
36,823,123.67 36,823,123.67
Page 3
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
0.00
0.250
0.247
0.250
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
8,776,612.65
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
331,277.56
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
812,685.42
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
1,535,135.97
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
0.540
0.533
0.540
1
350.93
0.000
0.000
1
0.00
0.360
0.355
0.360
1
36,823,123.67
0.186
0.189
1
Retention Escrow Account
PACIFIC PREMIER
20190607-882
PACIFIC PREMIER
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848050-0
2002 ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848060-0
2006AESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848070-0
2006BESCRO
USBANK
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
218848080-0
2007ESCROW
USBANK
07/01/2020
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.000
0.000
1
229462020-2
03-01 ESCROW
U.S. Treasury
736,666.53
736,666.53
736,666.53
0.063 0.062
0.063
1
Subtotal and Average
736,403.97
736,666.53
736,666.53
736,666.53
0.062
0.063
1
Letter of Credit
218848006-1
2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2020
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
1
233358006-1
01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2020
1.00
1.00
1.00
0.000
0.000
1
Subtotal and Average 2.00
2.00
2.00
2.00
0.000
0.000
1
Trust Accounts
6746058700
PARS Pension US Bank Trust
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
6.460 6.372
6.460
1
Subtotal and Average 13,689,219.00
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
16,021,003.31
6.372
6.460
1
Local Agency Investment Funds
SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun
SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun
SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 02/09/2021 12:33
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:33
39,990,406.31 40,081,237.24 39,990,406.31 0.540 0.533 0.540
1,884.44 1,888.72 1,884.44 0.540 0.533 0.540
39,027,321.21 39,115,964.67 39,027,321.21 0.540 0.533 0.540
1
1
1
Portfolio TEME
NL! CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
CUSIP Investment # Issuer
Subtotal and Average
Federal Agency Callable Securities
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Portfolio Details - Investments
December 31, 2020
Average Purchas
Balance a Par Value Market Value
78,051,870.02 79,019,611.96 79,199,090.63
3133ELFX7
01252
Federal Farm Credit Bank
12/30/2019
0.00
0.00
3130ABYY6
01235
Federal Home Loan Bank
08/24/2017
1,000,000.00
1,002,330.00
3134GBGZ9
01232
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
04/27/2017
1,000,000.00
1,019,890.00
3134GSMF9
01246
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
05/30/2018
1,000,000.00
1,011,180.00
3134GU6D7
01253
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
01/28/2020
1,000,000.00
1,000,720.00
3134GXJL9
01257
Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp
12/30/2020
1,000,000.00
1,000,020.00
3136G4UL5
01255
Federal National Mtg Assn
02/26/2020
1,000,000.00
1,001,450.00
Subtotal and Average 6,000,000.00
Federal Agency Bullet Securities
3133EJT74
01249
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133ELMA9
01254
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3133ELTU8
01256
Federal Farm Credit Bank
3130ADEB4
01240
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130ADSJ2
01244
Federal Home Loan Bank
3130AHF81
01251
Federal Home Loan Bank
3135GOU92
01250
Federal National Mtg Assn
Subtotal and Average
7,000,000.00
Total and Average 149,755,606.19
11/15/2018
02/07/2020
03/18/2020
01 /12/2018
03/08/2018
10/25/2019
01 /11 /2019
6,000,000.00
1,000,000.00
1, 000, 000.00
1, 000, 000.00
1, 000, 000.00
1, 000, 000.00
1,000,000.00
1, 000, 000.00
7,000,000.00
6,035,590.00
Page 4
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to Maturity
Book Value
Rate
360
365 Maturity Date
79,019,611.96
0.533
0.540
1
0.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
363 12/30/2021
1,000,000.00
1.750
1.726
1.750
54 02/24/2021
1,000,000.00
2.000
1.964
1.991
391 01/27/2022
1,000,000.00
3.000
2.959
3.000
875 05/26/2023
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
938 07/28/2023
1,000,000.00
0.500
0.493
0.500
1,824 12/30/2025
1,000,000.00
1.650
1.627
1.650
1,151 02/26/2024
6,000,000.00
1.733
1.757
872
1,025,570.00
1,000,000.00
3.050
3.008
3.050
318
11/15/2021
1,030,880.00
1,000,000.00
1.420
1.401
1.420
948
08/07/2023
1,021,370.00
1,000,000.00
0.920
0.907
0.920
1,172
03/18/2024
1,000,450.00
1,000,000.00
2.125
2.096
2.125
11
01/12/2021
1,004,240.00
1,000,000.00
2.460
2.426
2.460
66
03/08/2021
1,012,140.00
1,000,000.00
1.600
1.578
1.600
297
10/25/2021
1,025,620.00
1,000,000.00
2.625
2.589
2.625
375
01/11/2022
7,120,270.00
7,000,000.00
2.001
2.029
455
145,600,407.47 145,935,746.14 145,600,407.47 1.205 1.222 59
Portfolio TEME
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 02/09/2021 12:33 NL! CP
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:33
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Portfolio Managment Treasury Report
Portfolio Management
Page 5
Portfolio Details - Cash
December 31, 2020
Average
Purchas
Stated
YTM
YTM
Days to
CUSIP
Investment #
Issuer Balance
a Par Value
Market Value
Book Value Rate
360
365 Maturity
Passbook/Checking
Accounts
1453718479
WORKERS
BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC
07/01/2020 9,888.37
9,888.37
9,888.37
0.000
0.000
1
SYSPetty Cash
Petty Cash
City of Temecula
07/01/2020 3,911.00
3,911.00
3,911.00
0.000
0.000
1
SYSGen Ck Acct
Gen Ck Acct
Union Bank of California
3,963,926.82
3,963,926.82
3,963,926.82
0.000
0.000
1
SYSParking Ck
PARKING CITA
Union Bank of California
07/01/2020 6,851.50
6,851.50
6,851.50
0.000
0.000
1
Average Balance 0.00
1
Total Cash and Investments 149,755,606.19
Data Updated: SET _MTH: 02/09/2021 12:33
Run Date: 02/09/2021 - 12:33
149,584,985.16 149,920,323.83 149,584,985.16 1.205 1.222 59
Portfolio TEME
NL! CP
PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0
Cash and Investments Report
CITY OF TEMECULA
Through December 2020
Fund
# Fund Name
Beginning
Balance
Receipts
Disbursements
Fund Total
001
GENERAL FUND
$
31,357,351.70
$ 11,188,986.59
$ 10,506,636.70
$ 32,039,701.59
002
MEASURE S FUND
17,403,608.38
2,544,981.25
4,346,907.71
15,601,681.92
100
STATE GAS TAX FUND
231,373.08
448,524.36
679,897.44
102
RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT
2,022,815.69
156,430.07
3,196.27
2,176,049.49
103
STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND
1,459,178.35
-
2,140.15
1,457,038.20
106
JEFFERSON STREET IN LIEU FEES
893,675.72
1,310.74
892,364.98
107
CARES ACT
1,382,508.00
-
-
1,382,508.00
120
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND
3,222,118.75
75,154.04
799,136.06
2,498,136.73
125
PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT
463,257.15
-
679.45
462,577.70
145
TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM
198,581.56
-
291.26
198,290.30
150
AB 2766 FUND
36,487.40
37,416.83
108.39
73,795.84
160
SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
114,603.43
8,333.33
122,936.76
-
161
TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND
27,147.68
-
39.82
27,107.86
165
AFFORDABLE HOUSING
1,877,623.65
61,066.00
31,515.91
1,907,173.74
170
MEASURE A FUND
7,884,863.13
281,223.73
905,889.38
7,260,197.48
190
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
992,861.05
68,797.80
1,061,658.85
-
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
180,804.84
-
2,425.19
178,379.65
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
208,827.13
9,312.77
199,514.36
195
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT
28,300.02
-
41.51
28,258.51
196
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
350,929.69
120.00
14,212.21
336,837.48
197
TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
398,166.87
223.10
114,567.96
283,822.01
198
PUBLIC ART
68,846.14
2,581.80
104.76
71,323.18
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND
16,884,738.40
6,131,426.21
1,514,231.24
21,501,933.37
275
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND
194,076.34
4.37
-
194,080.71
277
CFD-RORIPAUGH
8,921,447.22
6.62
211.00
8,921,242.84
278
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
6,722,258.73
151.46
-
6,722,410.19
300
INSURANCE FUND
1,179,977.94
52,210.00
33,621.60
1,198,566.34
305
WORKER'S COMPENSATION
2,247,254.21
20,000.00
53,104.54
2,214,149.67
310
VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND
1,636,902.74
51,919.00
12,818.33
1,676,003.41
320
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
882,575.28
1,161,554.36
483,713.40
1,560,416.24
325
TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
1,121,533.50
39,345.00
2,543.62
1,158,334.88
330
CENTRAL SERVICES
3,106.56
55,388.35
22,987.58
35,507.33
335
CENTRAL SERVICES
353,283.42
6,606.00
5,839.39
354,050.03
340
FACILITIES
79,541.56
265,417.01
87,019.25
257,939.32
350
FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND
520,557.01
8,605.00
300,763.49
228,398.52
380
SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND
12,851,629.41
8,360,907.11
11,001,743.48
10,210,793.04
381
REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST
1,399,508.07
1,399,507.07
1.00
460
CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND
95,210.28
-
139.64
95,070.64
472
CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE
656,839.56
14.07
651.13
656,202.50
473
CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,716,510.18
274.60
634.98
1,716,149.80
474
AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE
7,232.72
-
614.36
6,618.36
475
CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND
1,796,314.19
302.24
809.94
1,795,806.49
476
CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND
381,993.92
0.44
649.94
381,344.42
477
CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND
859,747.81
18.92
917.35
858,849.38
478
CFD-RORIPAUGH II
3,484,722.49
78.02
635.83
3,484,164.68
502
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK
94,925.44
-
620.30
94,305.14
503
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS
27,850.97
579.17
27,271.80
504
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS
2,063.64
97.16
1,966.48
505
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES
15,801.17
555.89
15,245.28
506
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY
31,752.98
461.60
31,291.38
507
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW
2,867.82
522.05
2,345.77
508
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE
64,533.47
3,411.98
61,121.49
509
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA
28,206.17
239.93
27,966.24
510
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE
10,559.80
1,259.30
9,300.50
511
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW
2,557.20
67.89
2,489.31
512
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS
85,205.62
3,281.73
81,923.89
513
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP
17,174.47
817.32
16,357.15
514
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES
6,097.07
646.38
5,450.69
515
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES
7,605.25
142.06
7,463.19
516
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS
48,729.81
1,349.54
47,380.27
517
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA
1,281.67
54.86
1,226.81
518
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS
25,375.03
1,629.95
23,745.08
519
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR
77,837.46
1,151.44
76,686.02
520
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL
175,808.54
4,238.84
171,569.70
521
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH
158,187.05
7,604.66
150,582.39
522
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE
8,523.58
84.10
8,439.48
523
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
19,302.35
-
135.17
19,167.18
524
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON
1,714.84
19,468.61
21,183.45
-
525
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS
53,983.43
-
874.85
53,108.58
526
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION
872.39
59.01
813.38
527
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE
5,276.48
254.89
5,021.59
528
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK
624,478.73
9,063.43
615,415.30
529
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT
2,767.89
66.05
2,701.84
530
SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES
36,225.54
53.13
36,172.41
701
PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND
$
13,611,492.86
4,409,510.45
2,000,000.00
$ 16,021,003.31
Grand Total:
$
150,049,949.67
$ 35,457,046.74
$ 35,586,672.58
$ 149,920,323.83
Journal Entries completed after November's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts I Disbursements columns.
Item No. 5
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Receive and File the Police Services Joint Powers Authority Feasibility Assessment
Prepared by Citygate Associates (At the Request of the Public Safety Ad -Hoc
Subcommittee Mayor Edwards and Mayor Pro Tempore Rahn)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Police Services Joint
Powers Authority (JPA) Feasibility Assessment prepared by Citygate Associates dated February
2, 2021.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula along with the cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa
Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, and Wildomar (Cities) retained Citygate
Associates, LLC (Citygate) to study the feasibility of separating the Cities' police services from
the Riverside County (County) Sheriff's Department into a city -centric Joint Powers Authority
(JPA), with the intent to increase cost-effectiveness while retaining current service levels.
This assessment was prompted by several years of rising costs for the Sheriff's Department's
contracts to the Cities for local law enforcement services. It must be stressed that none of the Cities
had problems with services or law enforcement leadership in their respective Cities. However, the
large agency legacy costs and complicated formulas by which the Cities are charged for direct
services, headquarters services, and overhead had risen to the point the Cities felt it necessary to
study a fiscally responsible alternative without lowering services. City general taxes and revenues
pay for the law enforcement contracts, and in most cities this expense is their largest, with no local
control over annual cost increases, which strains the ability to provide other city services.
In lieu of each city establishing its own police department with resultant duplicated headquarters
and support costs, the Cities wanted to study establishing one new police agency under California
law, which permits local governments of all types to use a JPA structure. JPAs can have governing
boards comprised of members from the partner agencies and directly employ personnel and own
and operate physical assets.
In summary, this study finds and recommends the partners do not establish a police agency JPA
but rather continue to work within the Sheriff's Department's recent efforts to more directly tailor
city costs versus unincorporated area services and general County overhead.
The City of Temecula has participated with Sheriff Bianco's "Research and Development" (R&D)
team to further study alternate deployment and staffing models to further provide for costs savings
while not sacrificing service delivery. Unfortunately, these efforts were curtailed last year when
the global Coronavirus pandemic required local governments, including policing agencies to
redirect their attention to COVID-19 response. We are hopeful these efforts and discussion can
resume soon as the public health crisis eases, and we are able to return to normal operations.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS: Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment, February 2, 2021
POLICE SERVICES IPA FEASIBILITY
ASSESSMENT
FEBRUARY 2, 2021
'n"OTTOfft flN&TfS, LK
600 COOLIDGE DR., STE.150 PHONE: (916) 458-5100
FOLSOM, CA 95630 FAX: (916) 983-2090
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CPrfian
Page
ExecutiveSummary.....................................................................................................................................................1
Recommendation........................................................................................................................................ 3
Section1—Study and Agency Background...............................................................................................................4
1.1 How This Analysis Was Performed...............................................................................................4
1.2 Key Contract Measures per City....................................................................................................4
Section 2—Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis...........................................................................................................8
2.1 Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis and Costing Model..................................................................8
2.2 Existing Contract Operational Analysis........................................................................................9
Section3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis.....................................................................................................................15
3.1 Macro Cost Comparison of Personnel Costs for Current Sheriff's Department Contract Costing
toPolice JPA...............................................................................................................................15
3.2 JPA Start-up Cost Estimate.........................................................................................................18
3.3 JPA Cost Allocation Methodology Options................................................................................19
3.4 New Sheriff's Department Cost Control Measures.....................................................................20
Section4—Recommendation....................................................................................................................................22
Tahln of TahlPc
Table 1-Summary
Personnel Cost and FTE Comparison...........................................................................................2
Table 2-Estimated
JPA Start-up Costs........................................................................................................................2
Table 3—Patrol
Personnel Costs — FY 19/20................................................................................................................9
Table 4—Patrol
Rate Components — FY 19/20.............................................................................................................9
Table 5—Patrol
Plus Dedicated Positions per City per Day — FY 19/20....................................................................10
Table 6—Rate-Supported
Positions — FY 19/20.........................................................................................................11
Table 7—Dedicated
and Rate Supported Positions — FY 19/20..................................................................................13
Table 8—Sheriff
s Department Costs — FY 19/20 Adopted Budgets..........................................................................16
Table 9-JPA
Cost Model with Current Service Levels 80 Percent Classic / 20 Percent PEPRA ...........................17
Table 10
Summary Personnel Cost and FTE Comparison.......................................................................................17
Table 11
Estimated JPA Start-up Costs....................................................................................................................18
Table 12
JPA Cost Allocation Formula Options — Using Sheriff's Personnel Costs................................................19
Table of Contents page i
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula,
and Wildomar (Cities) retained Citygate Associates, LLC (Citygate) to study the feasibility of
separating the Cities' police services from the Riverside County (County) Sheriff's Department
into a city -centric Joint Powers Authority (JPA), with the intent to increase cost-effectiveness
while retaining current service levels.
This assessment was prompted by several years of rising costs for the Sheriff's Department's
contracts to the Cities for local law enforcement services. It must be stressed that none of the Cities
had problems with services or law enforcement leadership in their respective Cities. However, the
large agency legacy costs and complicated formulas by which the Cities are charged for direct
services, headquarters services, and overhead had risen to the point the Cities felt it necessary to
study a fiscally responsible alternative without lowering services. City general taxes and revenues
pay for the law enforcement contracts, and in most cities this expense is their largest, with no local
control over annual cost increases, which strains the ability to provide other city services.
In lieu of each city establishing its own police department with resultant duplicated headquarters
and support costs, the Cities wanted to study establishing one new police agency under California
law, which permits local governments of all types to use a JPA structure. JPAs can have governing
boards comprised of members from the partner agencies and directly employ personnel and own
and operate physical assets.
In summary, this study finds and recommends the partners do not establish a police agency JPA
but rather continue to work within the Sheriff's Department's recent efforts to more directly tailor
city costs versus unincorporated area services and general County overhead.
Citygate's key findings are:
♦ The Cities have been satisfied with police services provided by the Sheriff's
Department.
♦ The Sheriff's Department's revised contract formulas are highly sophisticated.
♦ The current city Sheriff's Department's staffing is not based on detailed workload
analysis.
♦ A macro analysis of JPA operational costs shows no savings.
♦ The fiscal situation post-COVID-19 has worsened, likely curtailing the ability to
fund a large new agency's start-up costs.
" W% "
Executive Summary page 1 a
1111If flSSSCIfl1fS. fK
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
The summary personnel cost comparison model of the current costs and full-time equivalents
(FTEs) versus a JPA revealed the following:
Table 1—Summary Personnel Cost and FTE Comparison
This cost estimate model is based on the current as -is number of Sheriff's Department personnel
supporting the Cities' contracts plus Citygate's estimate of headquarters services positions. The
JPA personnel costs were calculated using an 80/20 split between classic Ca1PERS retirement
formulas and Public Employees' Pension Reform Act (PEPRA) based on the need to hire middle
and upper rank employees, as well as the multitude of Ca1PERS employer regulations.
The total annual Sheriff's Department's costs in Table 1 are based on Fiscal Year (FY) 19/20
adopted budgets as published on each city's website; actual year-end closing costs were lower at
$125,416,738, per Sheriff's Department Administration. The adopted budgets are forecasted prior
to each fiscal year and are impacted by staffing changes throughout the year, leading to the actual
costs incurred. Given that these staffing changes are fluid year over year, Citygate used the more
stable cost comparison of the adopted budget to compare with the estimated JPA model.
Estimated start-up costs are as follows:
Table 2—Estimated JPA Start-up Costs
Category
Real Estate — Facilities ($900 x 43,000 sq. ft.)
$38,700,000
Fleet — Vehicles ($45,000 x 325)
$14,625,000
Police Safety Equipment ($9,000 x 445)
$5,000,000
Information Technology
$2,500,000
Communications (Dispatch) Infrastructure
$15,000,000
Miscellaneous
$4,500,000
Total
$80,325,000
According to a Citygate partner firm, JKA Architecture, new public safety building construction
costs are estimated between $800 to $1,000 per square foot and $550 to $600 for remodeling an
Executive Summary
�..
page 2
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
existing building. Those are hard costs. Soft costs (design fees, permits, project management or
construction management fees, etc.) can add an additional 30 percent to the overall costs.
Construction costs may be offset by utilizing city -owned building spaces.
Without start-up costs, a fully functional year -one JPA is more expensive. When start-up costs are
added, the expense only increases with the amount of needed building work and equipment costs
paid for using debt financing. The debt service payment annually adds more to the cost gap. The
previous model also assumes the County will provide dispatching and radio system access at a
reasonable cost. If the Cities' police JPA needs to construct and operate dispatching and radio/data
services over a large geography, then the annual JPA cost estimate will be substantially higher.
In addition to the start-up costs, there is also the practical difficulty in recruiting, hiring, on -
boarding, and training a 669-person workforce to new agency standards. This would require the
legal establishment of the JPA as an employer, along with enough of a command and human
resources staff to set up the agency and hire the employees. In the first two years, no services
would likely be provided at all to the Cities, so all these costs are in addition to the current contract
amounts. It is only by year three that phased -in conversion of services city by city could
commence, and this will likely take two to three years depending on the rate of hiring.
Citygate observes that all of the Sheriff's Department's proposed and currently implemented
staffing cost efficiencies are best practices and that appropriately using parts or all of them is the
best way to avoid unnecessary over deployment (cost) for the field patrol units.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the current Sheriff's Department Administration's willingness to research and develop
cost -control initiatives, and given this preliminary JPA cost estimation is substantially higher than
the current contract amounts, Citygate recommends the Cities pursue the Sheriff's Department's
cost -controlling initiatives in -lieu of a JPA.
Additionally, over the next year, the Cities should request the Sheriff's Department conduct an
incident and community policing workload demand -based staffing study to further tailor their costs
to the needs of each city. This study would effectively be a Policing Master Plan per city to include
staffing levels, innovation, community engagement, oversight, and social justice/equity structures.
Executive Summary
..
page 3
11111111111KI11111,11 K
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
SECTION 1-STUDY AND AGENCY BACKGROUND
1.1 HOW THIS ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED
Citygate reviewed prior studies on JPA feasibility issues and provided a large background
document and electronic incident data request to the Sheriff's Department. Citygate then met
multiple times with the Cities and regional Sheriff's Department leadership, as needed, to:
♦ Obtain follow-up information to understand current deployment and special
services.
♦ Interview the Sheriff's Department's Command Staff for each city and the Sheriff's
Department's Administrative Supervisor in charge of administering the police
services contracts on contract pricing for each city.
♦ Discuss the risks to be protected in each city and any necessary near -term changes
to policing to accommodate changes envisioned in each city.
♦ Obtain the current Sheriff's Department's contracts by city, with costing
itemizations, to include direct and indirect charges for all types of services, along
with the regional cost sharing of services such as dispatch and specialty teams.
These issues were all tracked through the cost -allocation methodology and
compared to the different sized Cities in this study.
♦ Discuss the possibility of city cost -control better alignment of city versus County
costs with a newly established Sheriff's Department Research and Development
Unit.
♦ Conduct a high-level workload analysis based on the data received to determine the
need for each city's staffing and test the costs of several scenarios for a new
employer JPA based on the study's staffing model and the necessary headquarters
bureaus.
♦ Compare the JPA operating and start-up costs to the Sheriff's Department's
envisioned improvements to the contract cost model.
1.2 KEY CONTRACT MEASURES PER CITY
The following measures allow an understanding of the different scale and complexity in policing
the different Cities:
Canyon Lake
♦ Overall budget: $1,778,934 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
�..
Section 1—Study and Agency Background page 4 a
1111If flSSSCIfl1fS. fK
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
➢ Patrol operations: 24 hours per day (5 Deputies)
♦
Special services
➢ None
♦
Operated from the Sheriff's Department's Lake Elsinore Station
Jurupa Valley
♦
Overall budget: $20,460,073 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
Patrol operations: 180 hours per day (37 Deputies)
♦
Special services
➢ Traffic team (6 Deputies)
➢ Community policing (2 Deputies)
➢ Special Enforcement Team (SET) (6 Deputies)
➢ 5 dedicated Community Service Officers
♦
Operated from the Sheriff's Department's Jurupa Valley Station
Lake Elsinore
♦
Overall budget: $14,369,910 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
➢ Patrol operations: 130.8 hours per day (27 Deputies)
♦
Special services
➢ Traffic team (4 Deputies)
➢ SET / community patrol / lake patrol (5 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ 5 dedicated Community Service Officers
♦
Operated from the Sheriff's Department's Lake Elsinore Station
Moreno Valley
♦
Overall budget: $45,267,540 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
➢ Patrol operations: 458.5 hours per day (94 Deputies)
♦
Special services
➢ 1 Captain (90 percent)
Section 1—Study and Agency Background
page 5 = ?
CTgV, sxifla, ac
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
➢ Traffic team (9 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ K9 teams (3 Deputies)
➢ Crime prevention / graffiti prevention (4 Deputies)
➢ 17 dedicated Community Service Officers
➢ 1 Supervising Office Assistant
➢ 1 Office Assistant
♦ Operated from the Sheriff's Department's Moreno Valley Station
San Jacinto
♦ Overall budget: $13,254,533 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
➢ Patrol operations: 97 hours per day (20 Deputies)
♦ Special services
➢ K9 team (1 Deputy)
➢ Traffic team (4 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ Problem -Oriented Policing (POP) (4 Deputies)
➢ Crime Analyst (0.5)
➢ 4 dedicated Community Service Officers
➢ 2 Office Assistants
♦ Operated from the Sheriff's Department's Hemet Station
Temecula
♦ Overall budget: $34,860,436 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
➢ Patrol operations: 205 hours per day (42 Deputies)
♦ Special services
➢ 2 Sheriff's Department Lieutenants
➢ Traffic team (17 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ SET (5 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ Mall Officers (4 Deputies)
Section 1—Study and Agency Background
page 6 = ?
Tj
U1111salfl,g K
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
➢ K9 teams (2 Deputies)
➢ POP team (8 Deputies, 1 Sergeant)
➢ Gang / Pechanga / School Resource Officers (4.5 Deputies)
➢ 17 dedicated Community Service Officers
♦ Operated from the Sheriffs Department's Southwest Station
♦ Overall budget: $5,303,100 (FY 19/20 adopted budget)
➢ Patrol operations: 70 hours per day (14 Deputies)
♦ Special services
➢ Traffic team (1 Deputy)
➢ Community patrol (1 Deputy)
➢ 1 dedicated Community Service Officer
♦ Operated from the Sheriff s Department's Lake Elsinore Station
Section 1—Study and Agency Background page 7
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
SECTION 2-EXISTING CONTRACT FISCAL ANALYSIS
2.1 EXISTING CONTRACT FISCAL ANALYSIS AND COSTING MODEL
The current Sheriff's Department contract model identifies fully burdened (pay plus benefits)
hourly rates to be charged to applicable contract Cities for Sheriff's Department services at the
beginning of a fiscal year. The model is updated annually based on the prior fiscal year actuals,
and components in the rate structure are updated as needed. The Cities receive a bill for costs that
should have been charged, due by the end of July each year. In the spring of each fiscal year, an
annual presentation is made to the Cities explaining the revised rates and presenting the estimated
costs for the upcoming year.
The cost categories are:
♦ Class 1 — wages, special pays, and benefits (e.g., pension, health, workers'
compensation, etc.)
♦ Class 2 — materials, services, and supplies
♦ Internal service fund costs — motor pool, radio shop, etc.
♦ Countywide cost allocation plan (COWCAP) — equipment use allowance and
administrative costs (e.g., human resources, county counsel, purchasing)
♦ Hourly rates for positions vary depending on dedication levels and support levels.
The rate components are:
♦ Patrol Officers — Deputy Sheriffs and Corporals
♦ Sworn support — Lieutenants, Sergeants, and Investigators
♦ Central dispatch — various communications -related positions
♦ Classified support — classified Analysts, Community Services Officers, Accounting
Technicians, etc.
♦ Other support services — other supportive personnel (e.g., records, information
technology, training, human resources, and accounting).
The fully burdened hourly rate uses an estimate of total annual productive hours (annual minus
earned leave and training hours) for all applicable patrol personnel. In FY 19/20, the total
productive hours used were 1,338,306. Overtime and mileage costs are billed separately and not
included in the personnel base rates.
Section 2—Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 8 Z
1111If flSSKIfl1fS. K
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
This study used the Sheriff's Department's personnel cost model as depicted in the following table:
Table 3—Patrol Personnel Costs — FY 19/20
Average Annual
Average
Average
Salary and
Average Other
Salary/Benefit/
Other
Annual
..
ComponentFY 2019-20 Rate
Benefits per
Compensation
Compensation
Services Cost
Annual Cost
Patrol Officers
$151,712
$4,522
$156,235
$28,099
$184,334
Sworn Support
$213,075
$16,828
$229,903
$26,089
$255,993
Central Dispatch
$65,827
$9,927
$229,903
$8,273
$238,176
Classified Support
$89,461
$2,207
$125,665
$25,784
$151,449
Other Support Services
$102,126
$4,146
$106,272
$23,405
$129,677
Total
$153,789
$7,638
$161,427
$25,047
$180,138
When summarized in the following table, the field patrol personnel dollars calculation yielded the
hourly rates for the personnel costs per city:
Table 4—Patrol Rate Components — FY 19/20
2.2 EXISTING CONTRACT OPERATIONAL ANALYSIS
The following series of tables explains the total number of FTE employee positions currently
supported directly and indirectly by the city contracts based on the aforementioned Sheriff's
Department's cost model.
Section 2—Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 9 1
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
Table 5-Patrol Plus Dedicated Positions per City per Day - FY 19/20
S an
L San
Patrol Hours Contracted
24.00
180.00
130.80
458.50
97.00
205.00
70.00
1,165.30
Police Officers - Patrol'
$188.95
4.92
36.91
26.82
94.02
19.89
42.04
14.35
238.95
Police Officers - Dedicated Supported
$161.73
0.00
14.00
6.00
12.00
9.00
37.00
1.00
79.00
Police Officer - Dedicated Unsupported
$88.14
0.00
0.00
3.00
4.00
0.00
3.50
1.00
11.50
Sergeants - Dedicated
$124.28
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
6.00
Lieutenants - Dedicated
$138.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
Captains - Dedicated
$157.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
CSOs - Dedicated
$61.65
0.00
5.00
5.00
21.00
4.00
17.00
1.00
53.00
Office Assistants - Dedicated
$39.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
Crime Analyst - Dedicated
$60.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
Total FTEs
4.92
55.91
41.82
134.92
37.39
104.54
17.35
396.85
' Calculated based on 1,780 productive annual hours
2 Calculated based on 2,080 annual hours
Service levels in each city vary based on their individual size and needs and are specifically
enumerated in the scope of service section of the city's contract. The basic service provided is
patrol and is quantified by the hour. Each city contracts for a specific number of patrol hours each
day to handle public -generated calls for service (i.e., 9-1-1 calls). In Table 5, these patrol hours are
listed for each city in the first row, which is highlighted in yellow. The number of FTE positions
needed to meet the daily patrol hour obligation is calculated on an annual basis and charged at the
fully burdened hourly contract rate, as depicted in Table 4 ($188.95). The second row of Table 5,
highlighted blue and labeled "Police Officers - Patrol," identifies this FTE position number for
each city. For the purposes of this study, the titles of Police Officer and Deputy Sheriff are
synonymous; the latter title is used for specific employees of the Sheriff's Department and the
former for specific employees of a potential JPA.
If a city desires additional sworn officer positions for services other than patrol, such as traffic
enforcement, community policing, police dogs (K9), etc., these are considered special services and
those positions that are also enumerated in a city's contract are called "dedicated" positions. In
Table 5, these positions are captured in the third row titled "Police Officers - Dedicated Supported"
and are also highlighted blue.
The two aforementioned FTE types that are highlighted in blue in the table form the basis for all
of the "rate -supported" positions to be discussed later. There is a third classification of sworn
officer positions listed in Table 5 titled "Police Officer - Dedicated Unsupported" and highlighted
peach. These positions are assigned to a city and do not require additional support (i.e., dispatch
Section 2-Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 10 Z
�Uff E .Cifl f;
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
services, crime scene support, etc.); they are not factored into the rate -supported positions
calculation.
In addition to the patrol officer positions and the dedicated police officer (Deputy Sheriff) positions
listed, a city can contract for other dedicated positions, such as Sergeants, Lieutenants, Community
Service Officers (CSOs), etc. These positions are calculated at their weighted salary rate and are
listed in Table 5 as dedicated positions.
Included in the contracted rate for the positions highlighted in blue are all of the rate -supported
functions including sworn patrol, sworn support, central dispatch, classified support, and other
support services shown in Table 4, which includes the positions described in Table 6.
All of the aforementioned FTE positions are enumerated in the city contracts and are assigned to
the various Sheriff's Department stations associated with the city contract.
The following table reflects the rate -supported positions as previously mentioned.
Table 6-Rate-Supported Positions - FY 19/20
Investigators - Rate Supported
Ratio
9.80
Canyon
Lake
0.50
..
Valley
5.20
Lake
Elsinore
3.30
Moreno
Valley
10.80
San
Jacinto
2.90
Temecula
8.10
Wildomar
1.60
Total
32.40
Sergeants - Rate Supported
7.00
0.70
7.30
4.70
15.10
4.10
11.30
2.20
45.40
Lieutenant - Rate Supported
27.00
0.20
1.90
1.20
3.90
1.10
2.90
0.60
11.80
CSOs - Rate Supported
17.50
0.30
2.90
1.90
6.10
1.70
4.50
0.90
18.30
SSOs - Rate Supported
41.77
0.10
1.20
0.80
2.50
0.70
1.90
0.40
7.60
Accounting Technicians - Rate Supported
19.59
0.30
2.60
1.70
5.40
1.50
4.00
0.80
16.30
Office Assistants - Rate Supported
11.13
0.40
4.60
2.90
9.50
2.60
7.10
1.40
28.50
Central Homicide - Rate Supported
39.50
0.10
1.30
0.80
2.70
0.70
2.00
0.40
8.00
Administration (Internal Affairs) - Rate Supported
86.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Personnel (Recruiting) - Rate Supported
89.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Information Services (IT) - Rate Supported
28.30
0.20
1.80
1.20
3.70
1.00
2.80
0.50
11.20
Dispatch - Rate Supported
5.00
1.00
10.20
6.60
21.20
5.80
15.80
3.10
63.70
Accounting (Finance) - Rate Supported
52.00
0.10
1.00
0.60
2.00
0.60
1.50
0.30
6.10
Technical Services Bureau - Rate Supported
81.00
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.30
0.40
1.00
0.20
4.00
Grant Writing - Rate Supported
399.90
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.80
Training Center (Range) - Rate Supported
182.00
0.00
0.30
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.40
0.10
1.80
Total FTEs
4.20
42.20
27.20
87.50
24.00
65.30
12.90
263.30
Rate -supported positions are calculated by adding the total number of Police Officers - Patrol
(Table 5, second row) and the total number of Police Officers - Dedicated Supported (Table 5,
third row) assigned to a city. Those two combined numbers are then multiplied against a ratio
..
Section 2-Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 11 a
,r.frf �safl � ��
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
determined by the Sheriff's Department to come up with a rate -supported position. For example,
Investigators are included in the rate -supported ratio of 9.80; meaning that for every 9.80 Police
Officer — Patrol and Police Officer — Dedicated Supported positions a city pays for, one FTE
Investigator is included.
Using San Jacinto for illustration purposes, the calculation is as follows:
(19.89 + 9) / 9.80 = 2.9 Investigators (rate -supported by San Jacinto contract)
These positions are reflected in Table 6. The non -highlighted positions are those FTEs that directly
support the patrol and dedicated positions and work out of each city's respective Sheriff's
Department station. The light -yellow positions are those FTEs that are included in the rate but are
centrally located and operate on a regional basis, most often from the Sheriff's Department's
Headquarters.
The costing structure of dedicated or rate -supported personnel is necessary and common in local
government costing contracts. There needs to be a method to fractionally expense central
administration services at different usage rates to each position dedicated to a city's contract.
The cost model to derive personnel costs to each city then adds the patrol, dedicated, and rate -
supported positions together. For the purpose of Citygate expensing a separated police JPA, the
following table shows the total contracted for positions if all the Cities formed one police JPA.
Section 2—Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 12 a
ongmIft ,Ifl
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
Table 7-Dedicated and Rate Supported Positions - FY 19/20
IL Position
Patrol Hours Contracted
Rate
Ratio
Canyon
Lake
24.00
Jurupa
Valley
180.00
Lake
Elsinore,
130.80
Moreno
Valley
458.50
Sa.
Jac, nj
97.00
_94
205.00
70.00
1,165.30
Police Officers - Patrol
$188.95
4.92
36.91
26.82
94.02
19.89
42.04
14.35
238.95
Police Officers - Dedicated Supported
$161.73
0.00
14.00
6.00
12.00
9.00
37.00
1.00
79.00
Police Officer - Dedicated Unsupported
$88.14
0.00
0.00
3.00
4.00
0.00
3.50
1.00
11.50
Investigators - Rate Supported
9.80
0.50
5.20
3.30
10.80
2.90
8.10
1.60
32.40
Sergeants - Rate Supported
7.00
0.70
7.30
4.70
15.10
4.10
11.30
2.20
45.40
Sergeants - Dedicated
$124.28
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
6.00
Lieutenant - Rate Supported
27.00
0.20
1.90
1.20
3.90
1.10
2.90
0.60
11.80
Lieutenants - Dedicated
$138.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
Captains - Dedicated
$157.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
CSOs - Rate Supported
17.50
0.30
2.90
1.90
6.10
1.70
4.50
0.90
18.30
CSOs - Dedicated
$61.65
0.00
5.00
5.00
21.00
4.00
17.00
1.00
53.00
SSOs - Rate Supported
41.77
0.10
1.20
0.80
2.50
0.70
1.90
0.40
7.60
Accounting Technicians - Rate Supported
19.59
0.30
2.60
1.70
5.40
1.50
4.00
0.80
16.30
Office Assistants - Rate Supported
11.13
0.40
4.60
2.90
9.50
2.60
7.10
1.40
28.50
Office Assistants - Dedicated
$39.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
Crime Analyst - Dedicated
$60.04
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
Central Homicide - Rate Supported
39.50
0.10
1.30
0.80
2.70
0.70
2.00
0.40
8.00
Administration (Internal Affairs) - Rate Supported
86.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Personnel (Recruiting) - Rate Supported
89.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Information Services (IT) - Rate Supported
28.30
0.20
1.80
1.20
3.70
1.00
2.80
0.50
11.20
Dispatch - Rate Supported
5.00
1.00
10.20
6.60
21.20
5.80
15.80
3.10
63.70
Accounting (Finance) - Rate Supported
52.00
0.10
1.00
0.60
2.00
0.60
1.50
0.30
6.10
Technical Services Bureau - Rate Supported
81.00
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.30
0.40
1.00
0.20
4.00
Grant Writing - Rate Supported
399.90
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.80
Training Center (Range) - Rate Supported
182.00
0.00
0.30
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.40
0.10
1.80
Total Sworn FTEs
6.62
68.11
47.82
147.42
39.49
114.04
21.65
445.15
Total Non -Sworn FTEs
2.50
30.00
21.20
75.00
21.90
55.80
8.60
215.00
Total FTEs
9.12
98.11
69.02
222.42
61.39
169.84
30.25
660.2
However, the 660 positions that would yield a singular city -centric police department do not
include Sheriff's Department central administration positions that, by policy, were never expensed
to the Cities' contracts, including:
♦ Sheriff's Department Executive Management Team
♦ Station Captains
♦ Station crime analysis capability / unit
Section 2-Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 13 ?
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
Station forensic units
♦ Social media
Later in this JPA analysis, some of these positions will be added to the separated police JPA, which
further increases the costs for the JPA.
Section 2—Existing Contract Fiscal Analysis page 14
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
SECTION 3-POLICE JPA FISCAL ANALYSIS
3.1 MACRO COST COMPARISON OF PERSONNEL COSTS FOR CURRENT SHERIFF'S
DEPARTMENT CONTRACT COSTING TO POLICE .IPA
The final Citygate research step was to create a staffing and cost plan for a multiple -city police
JPA. In 2020, the Sheriff's Department was still working on testing cost control measures to the
differing contract Cities, so Citygate chose to build a cost estimation model for the JPA using
personnel and contract costs from FY 19/20. It was assumed that if the JPA was more expensive
in this comparison, any cost savings the Sheriff's Department adopted into future contracts would
only widen the cost differences between contracting and a multiple -city police JPA operation.
The following set of JPA cost model tables assumes the following:
♦ FY 19/20 Sheriff's Department personnel costs.
♦ FY 19/20 patrol and headquarters positions. Citygate reviewed field deployment
plans, which, along with Citygate's interviews, determined that patrol staffing
levels are not currently based on any evidence -based workload analysis. For JPA
cost comparison purposes, Citygate used the current staffing levels for FY 19/20.
♦ Given the Sheriff's Department contracts do not expense executive management
positions, these had to be estimated and added to the personnel costs.
Based on this cost model framework, the following table shows the combined cost for all
personnel, by city, in the city contracts:
Section 3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 15 a
- T Pt XIfl
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
Table 8-Sheriffs Department Costs - FY 19/20 Adopted Budgets
Patrol Hours Contracted
Rate
Ratio
LakMiLValley
24.00
180.00
Elsinore
130.80
Valleyo
458.50
Jacinto
97.00
Temecula
205.00
Wildomar
70.00
1,165.30
Police Officers - Patrol
$188.95
4.92
36.91
26.82
94.02
19.89
42.04
14.35
238.95
Police Officers - Dedicated Supported
$161.73
0.00
14.00
6.00
12.00
9.00
37.00
1.00
79.00
Police Officer- Dedicated Unsupported
$88.14
0.00
0.00
3.00
4.00
0.00
3.50
1.00
11.50
Investigators - Rate Supported
9.801
0.50
5.20
3.30
10.80
2.90
8.10
1.601
32.40
Sergeants - Rate Supported
7.00
0.70
7.30
4.70
15.10
4.10
11.30
2.20
45.40
Sergeants - Dedicated
$124.28
0.00
0.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
3.00
0.00
6.00
Lieutenant - Rate Supported
27.00
0.20
1.90
1.20
3.90
1.10
2.90
0.60
11.80
Lieutenants - Dedicated
$138.67
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
0.00
2.00
Captains - Dedicated
$157.08
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.90
CSOs - Rate Supported
17.501
0.30
2.90
1.90
6.10
1.70
4.50
0.90
18.30
CSOs - Dedicated
$61.65
0.00
5.00
5.00
21.00
4.00
17.00
1.00
53.00
SSOs - Rate Supported
41.77
0.10
1.20
0.80
2.50
0.70
1.90
0.40
7.60
Accounting Technicians - Rate Supported
19.59
0.30
2.60
1.70
5.40
1.50
4.00
0.80
16.30
Office Assistants - Rate Supported
11.13
0.40
4.60
2.90
9.50
2.60
7.10
1.40
28.50
Office Assistants - Dedicated
$39.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
2.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
5.00
Crime Analyst - Dedicated
$60.04
1 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.50
0.00
0.00
0.50
Central Homicide - Rate Supported
39.50
0.10
1.30
0.80
2.70
0.70
2.00
0.40
8.00
Administration (Internal Affairs) - Rate Supported
86.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Personnel (Recruiting) - Rate Supported
89.80
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.20
0.30
0.90
0.20
3.70
Information Services (IT) - Rate Supported
28.30
0.20
1.80
1.20
3.70
1.00
2.80
0.50
11.20
Dispatch - Rate Supported
5.00
1.00
10.20
6.60
21.20
5.80
15.80
3.10
63.70
Accounting (Finance) - Rate Supported
52.00
0.10
1.00
0.60
2.00
0.60
1.50
0.30
6.10
Technical Services Bureau - Rate Supported
81.00
0.10
0.60
0.40
1.30
0.40
1.00
0.20
4.00
Grant Writing - Rate Supported
399.90
0.00
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.00
0.80
Training Center (Range) - Rate Supported
182.00
0.00
0.30
0.20
0.60
0.20
0.40
0.10
1.80
Total Sworn FTEs
6.62
68.11
47.82
147.42
39.49
114.04
21.65
445.15
Total Non -Sworn FTEs
2.50
30.00
21.20
75.00
21.90
55.80
8.60
215.00
Total FTEs
9.12
98.11
69.02
222.42
61.39
169.84
30.25
660.2
FY 2019-20 Adopted Budgets
$1,778,934
$20,460,073
$14,369,910
$45,267,540
$13,254,533
$34,860,436
$5,303,100
$135,294,526
Based on Citygate's review of each city contract and interviews with Sheriff's Department
command staff personnel assigned to the supporting Sheriff's Department stations, the FTE
calculations and rate formulas used in the preceding tables are appropriate.
The following table adds JPA executive management positions for Police Chief, a Deputy Chief,
and Bureau Captains to the positions in Table 7 and Table 8. Also added is an estimate for services,
supplies, differential pay, overtime, etc. For pension expense, given likely Ca1PERS regulations
with the JPA's need to employ lateral hire mid- and upper management personnel plus
..
Section 3-Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 16 a
zfff �a1� K
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
investigators, the pension costs are estimated at CaIPERS legacy classic employee pension costs
for 80 percent of the workforce, with the remaining 20 percent of the workforce at entry-level
positions or employees new to CaIPERS under the pension reform PEPRA rates.
The net result of this table and the JPA cost model is a total of 669 full-time personnel at an
estimated annual cost of $139,056,052:
Table 9—JPA Cost Model with Current Service Levels — 80 Percent Classic / 20 Percent
PEPRA
Total Salary
and Benefits
Total Salary
and Benefits
of the
Position
of the
Position
Proposed
Blended
Position Classification
(Classic)
(PEPRA)
FTEs
(80-20 Split)
Police Chief
$446,557
$423,039
1.0
$441,853
Deputy Police Chief
$341,843
$324,153
2.0
$676,611
Captain
$301,359
$286,062
7.0
$2,088,096
Lieutenant
$261,182
$248,121
14.8
$3,826,829
Sergeant
$231,995
$221,040
54.3
$12,478,352
Investigator
$212,868
$202,978
40.2
$8,477,764
Corporal
$192,943
$184,162
0.0
Patrol Officer
$192,943
$184,162
334.5
$63,951,908
All non -sworn positions averaged
$106,792
$106,792
215.0
$22,960,362
Service/supplies costs per sworn
$45,038
$45,038
453.8
$20,438,277
position
Differential pay/mileage/overtime/
$3,716,000
other outside of above
Total
668.8
$139,056,052
The following table summarizes the total position quantities and costs between the FY 19/20
Sheriff personnel contract costs and the JPA model personnel cost estimate:
Table 10—Summary Personnel Cost and FTE Comparison
Section 3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 17
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
The city contracts each year provide for an estimated budget. At the end of a fiscal year there is a
true up where the Cities are charged only the actual costs. At the close of FY 19/20, the Sheriff's
Department's fiscal team reported the final contract city charge to be $125,416,738, or
approximately $10 million less due to some efficiencies being implemented, a lower -than -
estimated need for overtime, and unfilled positions (normal in any large organization due to
retirements and academy dates). The same will be true for a JPA; costs can shift slightly year over
year, even if salary, pension, and health costs stay the same. However, it should be noted that FY
19/20 was extraordinary due to widespread economic disruptions caused by COVID-19 stay-at-
home orders and business closures. The staffing flexibility in a crisis the Cities enjoyed through
direct dialogue with Sheriff's Department Administration would be difficult for a JPA to replicate.
3.2 .IPA START-UP COST ESTIMATE
Even if the personnel costs for the JPA were the same or less than the Sheriff's Department's,
starting a new agency of 669 personnel is a large, expensive effort. Even if some services can
continue to be contracted, start-up and service contracts need to be understood and added to the
previously listed personnel costs. The following table shows the estimated start-up and contract
service costs for a police JPA. While 9-1-1 dispatch center and technology services might possibly
be contracted through the Sheriff's Department, that feasibility is unknown at this point. Therefore,
the following table includes dispatch center spaces and all needed technology services provided
by the JPA.
Table 11—Estimated JPA Start-up Costs
Category
Real Estate — Facilities ($900 x 43,000 sq. ft.)
$38,700,000
Fleet — Vehicles ($45,000 x 325)
$14,625,000
Police Safety Equipment ($9,000 x 445)
$5,000,000
Information Technology
$2,500,000
Communications (Dispatch) Infrastructure
$15,000,000
Miscellaneous
$4,500,000
Total
$80,325,000
The Sheriff's Department owns some of the facilities. Some police station spaces in some of the
Cities might be able to utilize city -owned building space. If not, according to a Citygate partner
firm, JKA Architecture, new building construction costs for public safety "essential buildings"
under the California State building codes are estimated between $800 and $1,000 per square foot
and $550 to $600 for remodeling an existing building. Those are hard costs. Soft costs (design
fees, permits, furnishings, fixtures, equipment, and project management or construction
..
Section 3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 18 a
zFrf 1111� K
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
management fees, etc.) can add an additional 30 percent to the overall costs. If even five new police
buildings were built with bonds, there is still an added cost for debt service, which further increases
the cost difference with contracting and operating a JPA police department.
3.3 .IPA COST ALLOCATION METHODOLOGY OPTIONS
In a shared sub -regional police department, there must be mechanisms for local control via elected
officials, along with the ability to share costs equitably between cities of very different sizes with
different policing needs.
California's JPA law allows for this. In a JPA of this size, the Board of Directors would typically
be elected officials from the member cities. The Board would hire and manage the Police Chief as
the JPA's administrative leader, accountable to the Board. When the JPA is set up, the founding
agencies would choose the voting rules -either simple majority or weighted by agency size.
There are multiple cost allocation strategies possible within the structure of a JPA: per capita, 9-1-1
incident workload (calls for service), quantity of dedicated staffing, use of special teams, blended
multiple -part formulas, etc. As an illustration, the following table compares the Sheriff's
personnel -only costs shared across common formulas, including resident population, budget ratio,
number of sworn police officers, the number of all police department personnel as FTE, and
percentage of 9-1-1 incidents.
Table 12-JPA Cost Allocation Formula Options - Using Sheriff's Personnel Costs
IN.
Population
Canyon IF
Lake
11,106
Juru..
Valley
1031784
Lake
-ElsinoreA,
64,037
Moreno
Valley
205,034
San
&Li�nlo
_
47,474
Temecula
-
112,230
..Total
36,162
579,827
Percentage
1.92%
17.90%
11.04%
35.36%
8.19%
19.36%
6.24%
100.00%
Budget
$1,778,934
$20,460,073
$14,369,910
$45,267,540
$13,254,533
$34,860,436
$5,303,100
$135,294,526
Percentage
1.31 %
15.12%
10.60%
33.40%
9.78%
25.72%
3.91 %
100.00%
Sworn
6.62
68.11
47.82
147.42
39.49
114.04
21.65
445.15
Percentage
1.49%
15.30%
10.74%
33.12%
8.87%
25.62%
4.86%
100.00%
Total FTE
9.12
98.11
69.02
222.42
61.39
169.84
30.25
660.15
Percentage
1.38%
14.86%
10.46%
33.69%
9.30%
25.73%
4.58%
100.00%
2018 Calls
3,101
54,363
37,769
116,819
33,252
54,661
14,387
314,352
Percentage
0.99%
17.29%
12.01%
37.16%
10.58%
17.39%
4.58%
100.00%
As can be seen, given the diversity of size between the seven Cities, all of the formula tests come
out close to each other. If a JPA were to be feasible, the Cities could likely agree on one formula
or a blend of two formulas to use for cost sharing.
Section 3-Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 19 9
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
Other than office space, start-up costs could be shared using the same formula as annual operations.
Capital building construction costs would be the responsibility of each different city based on their
local options.
Another, harder -to -estimate cost at this feasibility point is 9-1-1 dispatch, radio, and mobile data
systems. The Cities' police JPA needs to have dispatching and radio/data services over a large
geography. The previous cost estimate includes the needed personnel, operating expense, and
capital expense for dispatch and technical services. The Sheriff's Department might consider a
contract with the JPA for these services, offering the best regional cost efficiencies.
Not yet fully calculated in the start-up costs is the practical difficulty in recruiting, hiring, on -
boarding, and training a 669-person workforce to new agency standards. This would require the
legal establishment of the JPA as an employer, along with enough of a command and human
resources staff to set up the agency and hire the employees. In the first two years, no services
would likely be provided at all to the Cities, so all these costs are in addition to the current County
Sheriff's Department contract amounts. It is only by year three that phased -in conversion of
services city by city could commence, and this will likely take two to three years depending on the
rate of hiring.
3.4 NEW SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT COST CONTROL MEASURES
After the change of Sheriffs in early 2019, Sheriff Chad Bianco formed a Research and
Development Unit and tasked them to, among other priorities, find cost efficiencies and deeply
review the contract Cities' cost model. The Unit's early efforts focused on patrol operations as that
is the Department's largest personnel expense and customer area. The Unit began developing
staffing plans based on workload measures. As the Unit looked at staffing for cost efficiencies, it
identified three variables:
♦ Reduce or redistribute staffing
♦ Reduce call volume
♦ Reduce time spent on calls.
The research of these variables drove several key findings for workload distribution:
♦ CSOs are currently being underutilized on patrol
➢ CSOs handle only 4 to 10 percent of calls
➢ CSOs are capable of handling an average of 25 percent of calls
♦ The cost difference between Patrol Deputies and CSOs is significant:
➢ The Patrol Deputy cost per hour rate is $188.95
Section 3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 20 a
- T Pt XIfl
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
➢ The CSO cost per hour rate is $61.64
➢ The potential Department -wide annual cost savings is $226,612.
Regarding time spent by Deputies on calls for service to gain efficiencies (cost per hour deployed),
the Unit evaluated the options of:
♦ No response — handling issues with a referral to another better suited type of
assistance
♦ Alternate reporting methods — including electronic, phone in, etc.
♦ Hybrid online reporting — incorporating elements of CSO assistance
♦ Online reporting — largely by the affected party
♦ Auto -populating report forms — easing repetitive entry by the Deputies on standard
issues and reducing report writing time.
Citygate observes that all of these elements to gain efficiencies in per -hour deployment are best
practices and that appropriately using parts or all of them is the best way to avoid unnecessary over
deployment (cost) for police services.
" W% .
Section 3—Police JPA Fiscal Analysis page 21 a
�Frf �safl� ;
Cities of Canyon Lake, Jurupa Valley, Lake Elsinore, Moreno Valley, San Jacinto, Temecula, and Wildomar
Police Services JPA Feasibility Assessment
SECTION 4-RECOMMENDATION
Based on the current Sheriff's Department Administration's willingness to research and develop
cost -control initiatives, and given this preliminary JPA cost estimation is substantially higher than
the current contract amounts, Citygate recommends the Cities pursue the Sheriff's Department's
cost -controlling initiatives in -lieu of a JPA.
Additionally, over the next year, the Cities should request that the Sheriff's Department conduct
an incident and community policing workload demand -based staffing study to further tailor their
costs to the needs of each city. This study would effectively be a Policing Master Plan per city to
include staffing levels, innovation, community engagement, oversight, and social justice/equity
structures.
..�..
Section 4—Recommendation page 22 a
(ITY(II` PS rCfl [,
Item No. 6
ACTION MINUTES
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
CALL TO ORDER at 8:20 PM: President Schwank
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
CSD CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
6. Approve Action Minutes of January 26, 2021
Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of January 26,
2021.
CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT
CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS
CSD ADJOURNMENT
At 8:22 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, February 23,
2021 at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council
Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Zak Schwank, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 7
ACTION MINUTES
JOINT MEETING - SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY / CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
41000 MAIN STREET
TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA
FEBRUARY 9, 2021
CALL TO ORDER at 8:22 PM: Chair Maryann Edwards
ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart
SARDA / COUNCIL PUBLIC COMMENTS - None
SARDA / COUNCIL CONSENT CALENDAR
Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar.
Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Alexander, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected
unanimous approval.
7. Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Purchase of Two Vacant Parcels - Assessor
Parcel Numbers 910-262-009 and 910-262-010
Recommendation:
That the City Council and Board of Directors take the following actions:
1. Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-07
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT
ENTITLED PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT AND JOINT
ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA,
AS BUYER, AND HOFF INVESTMENTS, L.P. AND PMD
INVESTMENTS, L.P. AS SELLERS (APNS 910-262-009 AND
910-262-010)
2. Appropriate $1,669,794 from the 2017B Housing Bond proceeds to
the French Valley Parkway/I-15, Phase III Capital Project; and
3. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute all necessary
documents, including those in substantially the form attached to the
Agenda Report, and take all necessary actions to effectuate the purchase
of Assessor's Parcel Numbers 910-262-009 and 910-262-010.
SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT
SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS
SARDA ADJOURNMENT
At 8:25 PM, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally
adjourned to Tuesday, February 23, 2021, at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session
commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California.
Maryann Edwards, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
Item No. 8
CITY OF TEMECULA / TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
Executive Director/Board of Directors
FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Approve and Adopt Resolutions of Intention to Form CFD 20-01, Authorize the
Levy of Special Taxes, Incur Bonded Indebtedness and Approve Related
Documents and Agreements
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/Board of Directors adopt the following
resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF
SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN — (HEIRLOOM FARMS)
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING
ITS INTENTION TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF
THE PROPOSED TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF AN
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
DISCUSSION: In March of last year, in response to a request by Meritage Homes of California,
Inc. ("Meritage"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted Resolution
No. TPFA2020-01 and the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-15, pursuant to which they
approved a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement, subsequently executed by the Authority, the City
and Meritage, where by Meritage agreed to pay the costs of the Authority and the City in
connection with the formation of a community facilities district. The Resolution of the Authority
also designated various consultants to assist with the formation of the community facilities district.
The Authority has now received a petition (including waivers) (the "Petition") from Meritage
requesting that it move forward with the formation of the community facilities district for the
purpose of financing public facilities and to fund the costs of municipal services in connection
with the planned Heirloom Farms development project. The community facilities district is
designated as the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01
(Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD").
The CFD is generally located west of Date Street between Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive.
The territory to be included within the boundaries of the CFD includes several County Assessor's
parcels identified in the Petition.
Community facilities district financing is a commonly used method of financing infrastructure and
services for new development in California. Commonly referred to as "Mello -Roos Financing"
this type of land -secured financing permits the local agency to levy special taxes and issue bonds
to pay for the public facilities and infrastructure costs and services necessitated by new
development. The costs of authorized facilities and services are, and debt service on any bonds
issued for the CFD is, paid from special taxes levied on real property within the CFD boundary.
The bonds typically are issued on a tax-exempt basis at the federal and state level.
The Authority will consider the adoption of two resolutions related to the formation of the
proposed CFD. The CFD will only include land owned by Meritage as delineated in the Petition.
In the Petition, the Property Owner has requested that the CFD levy special taxes and issue bonds
to provide funds to fund various public improvements identified as the "Facilities" on Exhibit A
in the Petition and to finance other costs of issuing the special tax bonds and of providing a reserve
fund for the bonds. It is also expected that special taxes will be levied to fund the costs of municipal
services identified in Exhibit A of the Petition.
The Authority proposes to use bond proceeds to finance the design, construction and installation
of certain public improvements, including related incidental expenses. These facilities will become
the property of and will be maintained by the City, the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD)
and the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD), as appropriate. To benefit future
residents within the CFD, the Authority expects to enter into a Joint Community Facilities
Agreement with each of the City, EMWD and TVUSD.
SPECIFIC ACTIONS: In order to initiate the process to form the CFD, the Board of Directors
of the Authority will consider adoption of two resolutions of intention relative to the proposed
CFD. These resolutions call for a public hearing on April 13, 2021 on the formation of the CFD
and the issuance of bonds for the CFD, and otherwise specify the boundaries of the CFD (by
reference to a map on file with the City Clerk, as Secretary of the Authority), the rate and method
of apportionment of special taxes to be levied solely on land in the CFD to pay for CFD authorized
facilities and services and to repay any bonds that may be issued for the CFD, and describe the
improvements to be financed and the services to be provided by the new CFD. The resolution of
intention to form the CFD also approves an Acquisition Agreement between the Authority and
Meritage whereby the Authority agrees to use proceeds of special taxes levied on property in the
CFD and proceeds of bonds issued for the CFD to pay costs of certain CFD authorized facilities
to be constructed by Meritage.
The City Council will consider adoption of a resolution approving a Joint Community Facilities
Agreement with the Authority whereby: it agrees to own and operate certain facilities financed by
the CFD, it agrees to provide the municipal services to be funded by the CFD and it agrees to assist
the Authority in administering the Acquisition Agreement. The Joint Community Facilities
Agreement allows for a credit against (or a return of) development impact fees and Quimby Act
fees otherwise applicable to the construction of residential units in the Heirloom Development,
from the proceeds of bonds issued for the CFD. In addition, the City will be allocated $750,000 of
bond proceeds that may be used to finance any capital improvements included in the City's Capital
Improvement Program for Fiscal Year 2021-2025.
FISCAL IMPACT: Meritage has agreed to pay all expenses incurred relative to the
proposed formation of the new CFD and the issuance of bonds for the CFD. Costs of issuance of
the proposed bond issue will be paid from the proceeds of the bonds to be issued by the Authority
for the CFD. All annual costs of administering the new CFD and the bonds issued for the CFD
will be paid from special taxes levied on the properties in the CFD. The bonds, if issued by the
Authority for the new CFD, would be payable solely from special taxes levied on land in the new
CFD and collected by the Authority. All costs of the City and the Authority to administer the
Acquisition Agreement and the Joint Community Facilities Agreement will be paid for with
proceeds of special taxes levied on property in the CFD.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Petition
2. TPFA Resolution of Intention to Form CFD
3. TPFA Resolution of Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness
4. City Resolution Approving JCFA and Implementation of AA
5. City Joint Community Facilities Agreement (JCFA)
6. Acquisition Agreement (AA)
7. Draft Boundary Map
Quint & Thimmig LLP
PETITION
(Including Waivers)
To Create a Community Facilities District and
With Respect to Related Matters
To the Board of Directors of the
Temecula Public Financing Authority
41000 Main Street
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Dear Directors:
1/5/2021
2/3/2021
2/9/2021
This is a petition to create a community facilities district, and with respect to related
matters, under Sections 53311 and following of the California Government Code (the "Act"),
and the undersigned hereby states as follows:
1. Petitioner. This petition is submitted by the entity identified below (the
"Petitioner") as the owner of the parcels of land identified below (the "Land"). By submitting
this petition, the Petitioner represents to the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the
"Authority") that it is the sole owner of the Land, and that the person executing this Petition is
authorized to execute it for the Petitioner.
2. Proceedings Requested. The Petitioner hereby asks that the Board of Directors of
the Authority undertake proceedings under the Act to create a community facilities district to
be designated "Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01
(Heirloom Farms)" (the "CFD"), to levy special taxes in the CFD and to authorize special tax
bonds for the CFD in an amount of not to exceed $17,000,000.
3. Boundaries of CFD. The Petitioner hereby asks that the territory to be included
within the boundaries of the CFD include the Land.
4. Purpose of CFD. The Petitioner hereby asks that the CFD be created, the special
taxes be levied and the bonds be issued (a) to finance costs of the public improvements
identified as the "Facilities" on Exhibit A hereto, and (b) to finance other costs of issuing the
special tax bonds and of providing a reserve fund for the bonds. It is also expected that special
taxes will be levied to fund costs of the "Municipal Services" identified on Exhibit A.
5. Election. The Petitioner hereby asks that the special election to be held under the
Act to authorize the levy of the special taxes and the issuance of the bonds and to establish an
appropriations limit for the CFD be consolidated into a single election and that the election be
conducted by the Authority and its officials, using mailed or hand -delivered ballots and that
such ballots be opened and canvassed and the results certified at the same meeting of the Board
of Directors of the Authority as the meeting at which the public hearings on the CFD under the
Act are to be held, or as soon thereafter as possible.
20009.18:J17269
6. Waivers. To expedite the completion of the proceedings for the formation of the
CFD, the Petitioner hereby waives all notices of hearings and all notices of election, applicable
waiting periods under the Act for the election and all ballot analysis and arguments for the
election. The Petitioner also waives (a) any requirement as to the specific form of the ballot to
be used for the election, whether under the California Elections Code or otherwise, and (b) any
notice with respect to the special taxes to be levied on property in the CFD otherwise required
by California Government Code Section 54930.
This Petition is dated February ___, 2021.
The property that is the subject
of this Petition is identified as
the Riverside County Assessor
Parcel Nos.:
916400034,
916400035,
916400036,
916400039 and
916400060
Meritage Homes of California, Inc.,
a California corporation
Nick Emsiek,
Division President
The address to which a ballot for the CFD election
may be sent:
MLC Holdings, Inc.
5 Peters Canyon Road, Suite 310
Irvine, CA 92606
Attention: Nick Emsiek,
Division President
-2-
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES AND MUNICIPAL SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE CFD
FACILITIES
It is proposed that the CFD be eligible to finance all or a portion of the costs of the following
facilities:
The acquisition and construction of: streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping
and traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways), including Temecula
Center Drive and Ynez Road within and in the vicinity of the CFD; stormwater drainage
systems (including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, junctions,
manholes, catch basins and related dewatering); street light improvements (including
light fixtures, substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street
signage (including traffic, stop and street name signs).
The foregoing are to include the acquisition of any related right-of-way and other land
needed for the installation of any such improvements, demolition of existing structures
and site leveling needed for the installation of any such improvements, erosion control,
and other appurtenances.
• The acquisition and installation of traffic signal improvements, including traffic signal
interconnection and video surveillance systems, at the intersection of Ynez Road and
Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of
Temecula Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances.
• Capital improvements included in the City of Temecula's adopted Capital Improvement
Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
• School improvements to be designated by the Temecula Valley Unified School District,
which may include construction of buildings, equipping of school facilities, and
acquisition of support and other appurtenances with a useful life of five years or more.
Sewer system improvements to be designated by the Eastern Municipal Water District.
The Facilities include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and planning,
the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any required
environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping and irrigation,
soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related overhead costs,
coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any of the foregoing.
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
It is proposed that the CFD be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following
municipal services:
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection.
• Maintenance of parks, and landscaping in public areas, public easements and public
right of way in or near the area of the CFD, such maintenance to include but not be
limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails,
and the furnishing of water for irrigation.
A-1
• Maintenance of public signage in or near the CFD.
• Maintenance of storm drainage systems within or serving the area of the CFD, and
including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins
and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
• Maintenance of sidewalks, streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the area of
the CFD, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and
street sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the CFD, and including
decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals, and traffic interconnection and video surveillance systems,
within and in the vicinity of the CFD, and including electrical, LED replacement,
maintenance and replacement.
• Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the CFD.
The CFD may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of
services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the
improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements,
the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any
lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining
equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus,
facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary
for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to
provide the services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses. The CFD may also
provide for the reimbursement to the City of Temecula to the extent that the City of Temecula
advances funds to pay for any of the foregoing services, and may fund reserves for repairs and
replacements and for future expected costs of services. It is expected that the services will be
provided by the City of Temecula, either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or
any combination thereof.
The services to be financed by the CFD shall be in addition to those provided in the territory
of the CFD before the date of creation of the CFD, and will not supplant services already available
within that territory when the CFD is created.
OTHER
The CFD may also finance any of the following:
1. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisal and price point study
costs, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, landowner
counsel fees and expenses, and all other incidental expenses related to any special tax bonds (the
'Bonds') issued for the CFD.
2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the Bond trustee or fiscal
agent related to the CFD and the Bonds.
3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the CFD advanced by the Authority,
the City of Temecula, any landowner in the CFD, or any party related to any of the foregoing, as
well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any
landowner in the CFD or any party related to any of the foregoing, for facilities, fees or other
purposes or costs of the CFD.
A-2
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO
AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN —
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Under the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, constituting Section
53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), this Board of Directors may
commence proceedings for the establishment of a community facilities district.
Section 2. There have been submitted to this Board of Directors a Petition (Including
Waivers) of Meritage Homes of California, Inc. (the "Petition"), requesting the formation by this
Board of Directors of a community facilities district under the Law to be known as the Temecula
Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the
"District").
Section 3. Under the Law, this Board of Directors is the legislative body for the proposed
District and is empowered with the authority to establish the District and levy special taxes
within the District.
Section 4. This Board of Directors proposes to begin the proceedings necessary to
establish the District pursuant to the Law. Receipt of the Petition to form the District is hereby
acknowledged. In furtherance of the formation of the District, it is also acknowledged that the
Authority, the City of Temecula (the "City") and MLC Holdings, Inc., are parties to a
Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement, pursuant to which MLC Holdings, Inc. has agreed to
deposit funds with City to pay the costs of conducting the proceedings to establish the District
and the possible issuance by the Authority of bonds for the District, subject to reimbursement
from the proceeds of bonds issued for the District, all as more specifically provided in the
Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement.
Section 5. The name proposed for the District is Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms).
Section 6. The proposed boundaries of the District are as shown on the map of the
District on file with the Secretary, which boundaries are hereby preliminarily approved. The
Secretary is hereby directed to record, or cause to be recorded, the map of the boundaries of the
District in the office of the Riverside County Recorder as soon as practicable after the adoption
of this Resolution.
Section 7. The types of public facilities (the "Facilities") and of municipal services (the
"Services") proposed to be eligible for funding by the District, in each case pursuant to the Law,
shall consist of those items listed on Exhibit A hereto under the headings "Facilities" and
"Services," respectively, which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
This Board of Directors hereby determines that the Facilities and the Services to be
financed by the District are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as a
result of development occurring and expected to occur in the territory included in the District.
This Board of Directors hereby expresses its opinion that the public interest will not be
served by allowing property owners to enter into contracts as contemplated by Section 53329.5(a)
of the Law, and does not intend to let property owners avail themselves of the actions otherwise
permitted by said Section 53329.5(a).
The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to enter into a joint community
facilities agreement with the City of Temecula, the Temecula Valley Unified School District, the
Eastern Municipal Water District and any other public entity that will own and/or operate any of
the Facilities, or that will provide any of the Services, with any such agreements to be in a form
provided by Bond Counsel.
Section 8. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay
for the Facilities and the Services, and/or pay the principal and interest as it becomes due on
bonds of the District issued to finance the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs
thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the
District, will be levied within the District and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad
valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall
determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and
method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the District,
in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the
maximum amount such owner will have to pay, and which specifies the tax year after which no
further special tax will be levied on land used for private residential purposes and which
otherwise complies with applicable provisions of the Act is described in Exhibit B attached
hereto which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein.
This Board of Directors finds that the provisions of Section 53313.6, 53313.7 and
53313.9 of the Law (relating to adjustments to ad valorem property taxes and schools financed
by a community facilities district) are inapplicable to the District.
Section 9. It is the intention of this Board of Directors, acting as the legislative body for
the District, to cause bonds of the Authority to be issued for the District pursuant to the Law to
finance the costs of the Facilities. If so issued, the bonds shall be in the aggregate principal
amount of not to exceed $17,000,000, shall bear interest payable semi-annually or in such other
manner as this Board of Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of
interest as may be authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and shall
mature not to exceed 40 years from the date of the issuance thereof.
N
Section 10. This Board of Directors reserves to itself the right and authority to allow any
interested owner of property in the District, subject to the provisions of Section 53344.1 of the
Law and such requirements as it may otherwise impose, and any applicable prepayment penalties
as prescribed in the indenture or fiscal agent agreement for any bonds of the Authority for the
District, to tender to the Treasurer of the Authority in full payment or part payment of any
installment of special taxes or the interest or penalties thereon which may be due or delinquent,
but for which a bill has been received, any bond or other obligation secured thereby, in the
manner described in Section 53344.1 of the Law.
Section 11. The levy of said proposed special tax shall be subject to the approval of the
qualified electors of the District at a special election. The proposed voting procedure shall be by
mailed or hand -delivered ballot among the landowners in the proposed District, with each owner
having one vote for each acre or portion of an acre of land such owner owns in the District.
Section 12. Except as may otherwise be provided by the Law or the rate and method of
apportionment of the special tax for the District, all lands owned by any public entity, including
the United States, the State of California and/or the City of Temecula, or any departments or
political subdivisions of any thereof, shall be omitted from the levy of the special tax to be made
to cover the costs and expenses of the Facilities, the issuance of bonds by the Authority for the
District and any expenses of the District.
Section 13. The Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula is hereby directed to
study the Facilities and the Services and to make, or cause to be made, and file with the Secretary
a report in writing, presenting the following:
(a) A brief description of the special taxes to be prepaid and of the Facilities
and the Services.
(b) An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of providing for the Facilities
and the Services, including the incidental expenses in connection therewith, including the
costs of the proposed bond financing, any Authority or City of Temecula administrative
costs and all other related costs.
Said report shall be made a part of the record of the public hearing provided for below.
Section 14. Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may
be heard, in the regular meeting place of this Board of Directors, City Council Chambers,
Temecula City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby
appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Directors, as legislative
body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the establishment of the District and
consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the
formation of the District and the levy of said special tax.
Section 15. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspaper published in the area of the District. The
3
publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date herein set for
said hearing. Said notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto.
Section 16. The Board of Directors may in the future, by resolution, approve an
agreement pursuant to Section 53314.9 of the Law, to accept an advance or advances of funds or
work -in -kind from one or more landowners in the District or related entities, which advances
may be repaid and work -in -kind may be reimbursed to the person or entity which advanced the
funds or work -in -kind subject to compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 53314.9 of
the Law.
Section 17. The Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that no further
environmental review is required for the funding of the Facilities and Services. On December 1,
2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-078 certifying a Subsequent Environmental
Impact Report ("SEIR") in connection with the Second Amendment to the Harveston Specific
Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. On January 6, 2021, the
Planning Commission adopted Resolution Nos. 2021-01 and 2021-02 finding that the Site
Development Plan and the Tentative Map for the Heirloom Farm's 321-unit residential project,
PA 18-0661 and 18-0662 ("Heirloom Farms Project"), to be consistent with the SEIR. All of the
Facilities and Services that are proposed to be funded by the proposed Bonds were included as
conditions of approval for the Heirloom Farm's Project and were considered and approved as in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") as part of the approval of
the Heirloom Farms Project. The Board of Directors, therefore, hereby finds and determines that
the Facilities and Services are exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182
as the Facilities and Services are in conformity with the Heirloom Farms Project. The Board of
Directors further finds and determines that the funding of the Facilities and Services does not
require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist.
Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the funding of the Facilities and
Services that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR approved by City Council
Resolution No. 2020-078 due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects and no substantial
changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are
undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new
significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified
significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not
known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more
significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously
examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation
measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would
substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines
to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which
are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation
measure or alternative. The Facilities and Services for the Heirloom Farms Project are consistent
4
with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The Facilities and Services are required to meet
all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR.
Section 18. The Acquisition Agreement to be entered into by Authority, for and on behalf
of the District, and Meritage Homes of California, Inc., in the form on file with the Secretary, is
hereby approved. The Executive Director is hereby authorized to execute and deliver the
Acquisition Agreement in said form, with such additions thereto or changes therein as are
deemed necessary, desirable or appropriate by the Executive Director upon consultation with the
Authority's General Counsel and Bond Counsel, the approval of such changes to be conclusively
evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Executive Director of the Acquisition Agreement.
Section 19. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Maryann Edwards, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of
February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES AND SERVICES
TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT
It is proposed that the District be eligible to finance all or a portion of the costs of the
following facilities:
The acquisition and construction of: streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping
and traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways), including Temecula Center
Drive and Ynez Road within and in the vicinity of the District; stormwater drainage
systems (including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, junctions,
manholes, catch basins and related dewatering); street light improvements (including
light fixtures, substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street
signage (including traffic, stop and street name signs).
The foregoing are to include the acquisition of any related right-of-way and other land
needed for the installation of any such improvements, demolition of existing structures
and site leveling needed for the installation of any such improvements, erosion control,
and other appurtenances.
• The acquisition and installation of traffic signal improvements, including traffic signal
interconnection and video surveillance systems, at the intersection of Ynez Road and
Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of Temecula
Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances.
• Capital improvements included in the City of Temecula's adopted Capital Improvement
Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
• School improvements to be designated by the Temecula Valley Unified School District,
which may include construction of buildings, equipping of school facilities, and acquisition
of support and other appurtenances with a useful life of five years or more.
Sewer system improvements to be designated by the Eastern Municipal Water District.
The Facilities include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and
planning, the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any
required environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping and
irrigation, soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related
overhead costs, coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any
of the foregoing.
A-1
MUNICIPAL SERVICES
It is proposed that the District be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following
municipal services:
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection.
• Maintenance of parks, and landscaping in public areas, public easements and public
right of way in or near the area of the District, such maintenance to include but not be
limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails,
and the furnishing of water for irrigation.
• Maintenance of public signage in or near the District.
• Maintenance of storm drainage systems within or serving the area of the District, and
including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins
and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
• Maintenance of sidewalks, streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the area of the
District, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street
sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the District, and including
decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals, and traffic interconnection and video surveillance systems,
within and in the vicinity of the District, and including electrical, LED replacement,
maintenance and replacement.
Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the District.
The District may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of
services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the
improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the
furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any lights or
irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment,
apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or
fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such
maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the
services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses. The District may also provide for
the reimbursement to the City of Temecula to the extent that the City of Temecula advances funds to
pay for any of the foregoing services, and may fund reserves for repairs and replacements and for
future expected costs of services. It is expected that the services will be provided by the City of
Temecula, either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof.
The services to be financed by the District shall be in addition to those provided in the
territory of the District before the date of creation of the District, and will not supplant services
already available within that territory when the District is created.
A-2
OTHER
The District may also finance any of the following:
1. Bond related expenses, including underwriters discount, appraisal and price point study
costs, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond and disclosure counsel fees and expenses, landowner
counsel fees and expenses, and all other incidental expenses related to any special tax bonds (the
"Bonds") issued for the District.
2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the Bond trustee or fiscal
agent related to the District and the Bonds.
3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the District advanced by the Authority,
the City of Temecula, any landowner in the District, or any party related to any of the foregoing, as
well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority, the City of Temecula, any landowner
in the District or any party related to any of the foregoing, for facilities, fees or other purposes or
costs of the District.
A-3
EXHIBIT B
RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX
FOR TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
The following sets forth the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for the levy and
collection of an Annual Special Tax A, an Annual Special Tax B, and an Annual Special Tax C in the
Temecula Public Financing Authority ("PFA") Community Facilities District No. 20-01 ("CFD No. 20-01").
An Annual Special Tax A, an Annual Special Tax B, and an Annual Special Tax C shall be levied on and
collected in CFD No. 20-01 each Fiscal Year, in an amount determined through the application of the
Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax described below. All of the real property within CFD
No. 20-01, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the
extent, and in the manner herein provided.
SECTION A
DEFINITIONS
The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings:
"Acre" or "Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor's
Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on the Assessor's Parcel Map, the land area as shown on the
applicable Final Map, or if the land area is not shown on the applicable Final Map, the land area as
calculated by or on behalf of the CFD Administrator.
"Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 as amended, being Chapter 2.5,
Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California.
"Administrative Expenses" means the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to
the administration of CFD No. 20-01, including but not limited to the following: (i) the costs of
computing Special Tax A, Special Tax B, and/or Special Tax C (the "Special Taxes") and of preparing the
annual Special Tax A, Special Tax B, and Special Tax C collection schedules (whether by the CFD
Administrator or designee thereof, or both); (ii) the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the
Authority, County, City, or otherwise); (iii) the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the fiscal agent or
trustee for any Bonds; (iv) the costs of commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure action
arising from delinquent Special Taxes; (v) the costs of the fiscal agent or trustee (including its legal
counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under any Indenture; (vi) the costs of the Authority,
City, or designee of either in complying with arbitrage rebate, mandated reporting and disclosure
requirements of applicable federal and State of California laws, and responding to property owner or
Bond owner inquiries regarding the Special Taxes or Bonds; (vii) the costs associated with the release of
funds from any escrow account established under an Indenture; (viii) the costs of the Authority, City, or
designee of either thereof related to any appeal of a Special Tax; (ix) an allocable share of the salaries of
the City staff and City overhead expense directly relating to the foregoing and (x) any other expense
eligible under the Act. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts advanced by the City or the
Authority for any administrative purposes of CFD No. 20-01.
B-1
"Annual Special Tax A" means for each Assessor's Parcel, the Special Tax A actually levied in a
given Fiscal Year on such Assessor's Parcel.
"Annual Special Tax B" means for each Assessor's Parcel, the Special Tax B actually levied in a
given Fiscal Year on such Assessor's Parcel.
"Annual Special Tax C" means for each Assessor's Parcel, the Special Tax C actually levied in a
given Fiscal Year on such Assessor's Parcel.
"Approved Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property other than Provisional
Exempt Property: (i) that are included in a Final Map that was recorded prior to the January 1st
immediately preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax A is being levied, and (ii) that have not
been issued a Building Permit on or before the April 1st immediately preceding the Fiscal Year in which
the Special Tax A is being levied.
"Assessor" means the Assessor of the County.
"Assessor's Parcel" or "Parcel" means a lot or parcel of land designated on an Assessor's Parcel
Map with an assigned Assessor's Parcel Number within the boundaries of CFD No. 20-01.
"Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor designating parcels by Assessor's
Parcel Number.
"Assessor's Parcel Number" means that number assigned to a lot or parcel of land by the
Assessor for purposes of identification.
"Assigned Annual Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A as described in Section D below.
"Authorized Facilities" means the public facilities authorized to be financed, in whole or in part,
by the CFD, as identified in the list of authorized facilities approved by the Resolution of Formation of
the CFD adopted by the Board of Directors when the CFD was formed.
"Authorized Services" means the services authorized to be funded, in whole or in part, by the
CFD, as identified in the list of authorized services approved by the Resolution of Formation of the CFD
adopted by the Board of Directors when the CFD was formed.
"Backup Annual Special Tax A" means the Special Tax A as described in Section E below.
"Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority,
acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 20-01, or its designee.
"Bonds" means any bonds or other indebtedness (as defined in the Act), whether in one or
more series, the repayment of which is secured by proceeds of the levy of Special Tax A on Assessor's
Parcels within CFD No. 20-01.
"Boundary Map" means a recorded map of the CFD No. 20-01 which indicates the boundaries of
CFD No. 20-01.
B-2
"Building Permit" means the first legal document issued by the City giving official permission for
new construction of improvements on an Assessor's Parcel in CFD No. 20-01. For purposes of this
definition, "Building Permit" may or may not include any subsequent building permits issued or changed
after the first issuance, as determined by the CFD Administrator.
"Building Square Footage" or "BSF" means the square footage of assessable internal living
space, exclusive of garages or other structures not used as living space, as determined by the CFD
Administrator by reference to the building permit application for such Assessor's Parcel.
"Calendar Year" means the period commencing January 1 of any year and ending the following
December 31.
"CFD No. 20-01" or "CFD" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. 20-01(Heirloom Farms) established by the Authority under the Act.
"CFD Administrator" or "Administrator" means the Finance Director of the City, or designee
thereof, responsible for, among other things, determining the Special Tax A Requirement for Special Tax
A, the Special Tax B Requirement for Special Tax B, and the Special Tax C Requirement for Special Tax C
and providing for the levy and collection of said Special Tax A, Special Tax B, and Special Tax C.
"City" means the City of Temecula, California.
"Consumer Price Index" or "CPI" means, for each Fiscal Year, the Consumer Price Index
published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics for "All Items for All Urban Consumers: in the Riverside -
San Bernardino -Ontario area", measured as of the month of December in the calendar year which ends
in the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Consumer Price Index shall
be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the
Consumer Price Index for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario area.
"County" means the County of Riverside, California.
"Developed Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property: (i) that are included in a
Final Map that was recorded prior to January 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which Special Tax A, Special
Tax B or Special Tax C are being levied, and (ii) for which a building permit was issued on or before April
1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which any or all of the Special Taxes are being levied.
"Exempt Property" means all Assessor's Parcels designated as being exempt from the Special
Taxes as provided for in Section P.
"Exempt Welfare Exemption Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, an Assessor's Parcel that is
(a) receiving a welfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the California Revenue and
Taxation Code (or any successor statute), as indicated in the County's assessor's roll finalized as of
January 1 of the previous Fiscal Year, and (b) exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to Section 53340(c)
of the Act. Pursuant to Section 53340(c) of the Act, after the issuance of the first series of Bonds, any
Assessor's Parcels that receive welfare exemption under subdivision (g) of Section 214 of the California
Revenue and Taxation Code (or any successor statute) shall not be classified as Exempt Welfare
Exemption Property and will be subject to the Special Tax.
B-3
"Final Map" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a final map, parcel map, or lot
line adjustment, pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et
seq.) or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 4285 that creates individual
lots that do not need, and are not expected, to be further subdivided prior to the issuance of a Building
Permit.
"Fiscal Year" means the period commencing July 1 of any year and ending the following June 30.
"Indenture" means the bond indenture, fiscal agent agreement, trust agreement, resolution, or
other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from
time to time, and any instrument replacing or supplementing the same.
"Land Use Type" means Residential Property, Multifamily Residential Property, or Non -
Residential Property.
"Maximum Special Tax A" means for each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property, the maximum
Special Tax A, determined in accordance with Section C that can be levied on each such Assessor's Parcel.
"Maximum Special Tax B" means for each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property, the maximum
Special Tax B, determined in accordance with Section I that can be levied on each such Assessor's Parcel.
"Maximum Special Tax C" means for each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property, the maximum
Special Tax C, determined in accordance with Section L that can be levied on each such Assessor's Parcel.
"Multifamily Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for
which a building permit has been issued for the purpose of constructing a building or buildings
comprised of attached Units available for rental by the general public, not for sale to an end user, and
which attached units are under common ownership, as determined by the CFD Administrator.
"Non -Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a
building permit was issued for any type of use other than Residential Property and Multifamily
Residential Property.
"Partial Prepayment Amount" means the amount required to prepay a portion of the Special
Tax A obligation for an Assessor's Parcel, as described in Section H.
"Prepayment Amount" means the amount required to prepay the Special Tax A obligation in full
for an Assessor's Parcel, as described in Section G.
"Proportionately" means for Special Tax A that the ratio of the Annual Special Tax A to the
applicable Assigned Annual Special Tax A is equal for all applicable Assessor's Parcels. In the case of
Special Tax B and Special Tax C, "Proportionately" means that the ratio of the Annual Special Tax B to
the applicable Maximum Special Tax B and the Annual Special Tax C to the applicable Maximum Special
Tax C is equal for all applicable Assessor's Parcels. In the case of Developed Property subject to the
apportionment of the Annual Special Tax A under Step Four of Section F, "Proportionately" means that
the quotient of (a) Annual Special Tax A less the Assigned Annual Special Tax A divided by (b) the Backup
Annual Special Tax A less the Assigned Annual Special Tax A, is equal for all applicable Assessor's Parcels.
B-4
"Provisional Exempt Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property subject to
Special Tax A that would otherwise be classified as Exempt Property pursuant to the provisions of
Section P, but cannot be classified as Exempt Property because to do so would reduce the Acreage of all
Taxable Property within the applicable Zone below the required minimum Acreage set forth in Section P.
"Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building
permit has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling units, and which
are not otherwise Multifamily Residential Property.
"RMA" means this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax.
"Special Tax(es)" means any of the Special Taxes authorized to be levied on Taxable Property
within and for CFD No. 20-01 pursuant to the Act to fund the Special Tax A Requirement, Special Tax B
Requirement, and/or the Special Tax C Requirement.
"Special Tax A" means any of the Special Taxes authorized to be levied on Taxable Property
within and by CFD No. 20-01 pursuant to the Act to fund the Special Tax A Requirement.
"Special Tax B" means any of the Special Taxes authorized to be levied on Taxable Property
within and by CFD No. 20-01 pursuant to the Act to fund the Special Tax B Requirement.
"Special Tax C" means any of the Special Taxes authorized to be levied on Taxable Property
within and by CFD No. 20-01 pursuant to the Act to fund the Special Tax C Requirement.
"Special Tax A Requirement" means, subject to the Maximum Special Tax A, the amount
required in any Fiscal Year to pay: (i) the debt service or the periodic costs on all outstanding Bonds due
in the Calendar Year that commences in such Fiscal Year, (ii) Administrative Expenses for such Fiscal Year
(apportioned between Special Tax A and Special Tax B), (iii) any amount required to establish or
replenish any reserve funds established in association with the Bonds, and (iv) the collection or
accumulation of funds for the acquisition or construction of facilities authorized to be funded by CFD No.
20-01, and paid for by the levy on Developed Property of the Assigned Annual Special Tax A provided
that the inclusion of such amount does not cause an increase in the levy of Special Tax A on Approved
Property or Undeveloped Property as set forth in Step Two and Three of Section F, less (v) any amount
available to pay debt service or other periodic costs on the Bonds pursuant to any applicable fiscal agent
agreement, or trust agreement.
"Special Tax B Requirement" means, subject to the Maximum Special Tax B, that amount to be
collected in any Fiscal Year to pay for certain Authorized Services as required to meet the needs of CFD
No. 20-01. The costs of services to be covered shall be the direct costs for (i) Authorized Services, and (ii)
Administrative Expenses (apportioned between Special tax A and Special Tax B); less (iii) a credit for
funds available to reduce the Annual Special Tax B levy, if any, as determined by the CFD Administrator.
Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax B Requirement include amounts needed to repay Bonds.
"Special Tax C Requirement" means, subject to the Maximum Special Tax C, that amount to be
collected in any Fiscal Year to pay for certain Authorized Services as required to meet the needs of CFD
No. 20-01. The costs of services to be covered shall be the direct costs for (i) Authorized Services, and (ii)
Administrative Expenses; less (iii) a credit for funds available to reduce the Annual Special Tax C levy, if
any, as determined by the CFD Administrator. Under no circumstances shall the Special Tax C
Requirement include amounts needed to repay Bonds.
B-5
"Special Tax Category" means any of the individual categories of BSF set forth in Tables 1
through 3 in Section D below.
"Taxable Property" means (i) with respect to Special Tax A, all Assessor's Parcels within CFD No.
20-01, which are not Exempt Property or for which the Special Tax A obligation has not been prepaid in
full, and (ii) with respect to Special Tax B and Special Tax C, all Assessor's Parcels within CFD No. 20-01,
which are not Exempt Property.
"Temecula Public Financing Authority" or "PFA" or "Authority" means the Temecula Public
Financing Authority, or its designee.
"Transition Event" shall be deemed to have occurred when the Administrator determines that
the following events have occurred: (i) all Bonds secured by the levy and collection of Special Tax A in
the CFD have been fully repaid, or there are sufficient revenues available to fully repay the Bonds in
funds and accounts that, pursuant to the Indenture, will require such revenues to be applied to repay
the Bonds; (ii) all Administrative Expenses from prior Fiscal Years have been paid or reimbursed; and (iii)
there are no other Authorized Facilities that the Authority or the CFD intends to fund with Bonds and
Special Tax A.
"Transition Year" means the earlier of: (i) the first Fiscal Year in which the Administrator
determines that the Transition Event occurred in the prior Fiscal Year, or (ii) Fiscal Year 2062-63.
"Undeveloped Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property which are not
Developed Property, Approved Property, or Provisional Exempt Property.
"Unit" means any residential dwelling unit excluding dwelling units within Multifamily
Residential Property.
RMA.
"Zone(s)" means Zone 1, Zone 2, or Zone 3 as geographically identified on Attachment A of the
"Zone 1" means the specific area identified on Attachment A as Zone 1 of CFD 20-01.
"Zone 2" means the specific area identified on Attachment A as Zone 2 of CFD 20-01.
"Zone 3" means the specific area identified on Attachment A as Zone 3 of CFD 20-01.
SECTION B
CLASSIFICATION OF ASSESSOR'S PARCELS
Each Fiscal Year, beginning with Fiscal Year 2021-22, each Assessor's Parcel within CFD No. 20-
01 shall be classified as Taxable Property or Exempt Property. In addition, each Assessor's Parcel of
Taxable Property shall be further classified as Developed Property, Approved Property, Undeveloped
Property, or Provisional Exempt Property. In addition, each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property,
Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Exempt Property shall be classified as being
within Zone 1, Zone 2, or Zone 3. If an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, Approved Property,
Undeveloped Property or Provisional Exempt Property is located within more than one Zone, it shall be
deemed to be entirely within the Zone in which the largest portion of its Acreage is located. In addition,
each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property shall further be classified as Residential Property,
B-6
Multifamily Residential Property or Non -Residential Property. Assessor's Parcels of Residential Property
shall be further categorized based on the Building Square Footage of each such Assessor's Parcel.
B-7
SECTION C
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX A
1. Developed Property
The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property,
Multifamily Residential Property or Non -Residential Property in any Fiscal Year shall be the
greater of (i) the Assigned Annual Special Tax A or (ii) the Backup Annual Special Tax A.
2. Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, and Provisional Exempt Property
The Maximum Special Tax A for each Assessor's Parcel classified as Approved Property,
Undeveloped Property, or Provisional Exempt Property in any Fiscal Year shall be the Assigned
Annual Special Tax A.
3. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax A
On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2022, the Maximum Special Tax A shall be increased
by an amount equal to one percent (1.0%) of the amount in effect for the previous Fiscal Year.
4. Maximum Special Tax A at Transition Year
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Special Tax A for any
Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property shall be $0.00.
SECTION D
ASSIGNED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A
1. Developed Property
Each Fiscal Year prior to the Transition Year, each Assessor's Parcel of Residential
Property, Multifamily Residential Property or Non -Residential Property shall be subject to an
Assigned Annual Special Tax A.
The Assigned Annual Special Tax A applicable to an Assessor's Parcel of Developed
Property shall be determined using the tables below.
TABLE 1
ASSIGNED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A RATES
FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY WITHIN ZONE 1
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Building Square
Assigned
Land Use Type
Footage
Special Tax A
Residential Property
Less than 1,801
$2,915 per
Unit
Residential Property
1,801— 2,000
$3,020 per
Unit
Residential Property
Greater than
$3,125 per
2,000
Unit
Multifamily Residential
N/A
$49,422 per
Property
Acre
Non -Residential Property
N/A
$49,422 per
Acre
TABLE 2
ASSIGNED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A RATES
FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY WITHIN ZONE 2
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Building Square
Assigned
Land Use Type
Footage
Special Tax A
Residential Property
Less than 1,551
$2,110 per
Unit
Residential Property
1,551— 1,750
$2,310 per
Unit
Residential Property
Greater than
$2,410 per
1,750
Unit
Multifamily Residential
N/A
$71,940 per
Property
Acre
Non -Residential Property
N/A
$71,940 per
Acre
TABLE 3
ASSIGNED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A RATES
FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY WITHIN ZONE 3
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Building Square
Assigned
Land Use Type
Footage
Special Tax A
Residential Property
Less than 1,601
$2,275 per
Unit
Residential Property
1,601 or Greater
$2,400 per
Unit
Multifamily Residential
N/A
$60,689 per
Property
Acre
Non -Residential Property
N/A
$60,689 per
Acre
2. Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Exempt Property
Each Fiscal Year, prior to the Transition Year, each Assessor's Parcel of Approved
Property, Undeveloped Property, and Provisional Exempt Property shall be subject to an
Assigned Annual Special Tax A. In the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, no Special
Tax A shall be levied on Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, or Provisional Exempt
Property. Notwithstanding the forgoing, if there are delinquent Special Tax A taxes on a Parcel,
such delinquent Special Tax A taxes will continue to constitute a lien against the Parcel until they
are collected. The Assigned Annual Special Tax A rate for an Assessor's Parcel classified as
Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, or Provisional Exempt Property shall be determined
pursuant to Table 4 below:
TABLE 4
ASSIGNED ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX RATES
FOR APPROVED PROPERTY, UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY,
AND PROVISIONAL EXEMPT PROPERTY
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Zone
Assigned Special
Tax A
Zone 1
$49,422 per Acre
Zone 2
$71,940 per Acre
Zone 3
$60,689 per Acre
B-10
3. Increase in the Assigned Annual Special Tax A
On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2022, the Assigned Annual Special Tax A for any
Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property shall be increased by an amount equal to one percent
(1.0%) of the amount in effect for the previous Fiscal Year.
4. Assigned Annual Special Tax A at Transition Year
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Assigned Annual Special Tax A for all
Taxable Property shall be $0.00.
SECTION E
BACKUP ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A
At the time a Final Map is recorded, the CFD Administrator shall determine the Backup Annual
Special Tax A for all Assessor's Parcels with a Zone classified or reasonably expected to be classified as
Residential Property within such Final Map by multiplying the Maximum Special Tax A rate for
Undeveloped Property for the applicable Zone by the total Acreage of Taxable Property within the
applicable Zone, excluding the Provisional Exempt Property Acreage, Non -Residential Property Acreage,
Multifamily Residential Property Acreage and any Acreage reasonably expected to be classified as
Exempt Property, and dividing such amount by the total number of such Assessor's Parcels within the
applicable Zone which are classified or reasonable expected to be classified as Residential Property.
The Backup Annual Special Tax A rate for Multifamily Residential Property or Non -Residential
Property shall be its Assigned Annual Special Tax A rate.
On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2022, the Backup Annual Special Tax A shall be increased by
an amount equal to one percent (1.0%) of the amount in effect for the previous Fiscal Year.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Assessor's Parcels which are classified or to be classified as
Residential Property, Non -Residential Property or Multifamily Property are subsequently changed by
recordation of a lot line adjustment, Final Map amendment, new Final Map or similar instrument, then
the Backup Annual Special Tax A shall be recalculated within the area that has been changed to equal
the amount of Backup Annual Special Tax A that would have been generated if such change did not take
place.
SECTION F
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE ANNUAL SPECIAL TAX A
Commencing Fiscal Year 2021-22 and for each subsequent Fiscal Year, the Board of Directors
shall levy the Annual Special Tax A in accordance with the following steps:
Step One: The Annual Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of
Developed Property at up to 100% of the applicable Assigned Annual Special Tax A rates
in Tables 1, 2, and 3 to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.
B-11
Step Two: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first
step has been completed, the Annual Special Tax A shall be levied Proportionately on
each Assessor's Parcel of Approved Property at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum
Annual Special Tax A to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.
Step Three: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first
two steps have been completed, the Annual Special Tax A shall be levied
Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Undeveloped Property up to 100% of the
Maximum Annual Special Tax A for Undeveloped Property applicable to each such
Assessor's Parcel as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.
Step Four: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first
three steps have been completed, the Annual Special Tax A on each Assessor's Parcel of
Developed Property for which the Maximum Special Tax A is the Backup Annual Special
Tax A shall be increased Proportionately from the Assigned Annual Special Tax A up to
100% of the Backup Annual Special Tax A as needed to satisfy the Special Tax A
Requirement.
Step Five: If additional moneys are needed to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement after the first
four steps have been completed, the Annual Special Tax A shall be levied
Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of Provisional Exempt Property up to 100% of
the Maximum Annual Special Tax A applicable to each such Assessor's Parcel as needed
to satisfy the Special Tax A Requirement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to Section 53321 (d) of the Act, the Special Tax A levied
against an Assessor's Parcel used for private residential purposes shall under no circumstances increase
more than ten (10%) as a consequence of delinquency of default by the owner of any other Assessor's
Parcel or Assessor's Parcels and shall, in no event, exceed the Maximum Special Tax A in effect for the
Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax A is being levied.
SECTION G
PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A
The following definitions apply to this Section G:
"Business Day" means days Temecula City Hall is open for business.
"CFD Public Facilities Amount" means $12,200,000 expressed in 2021 dollars, which shall
increase by the Construction Inflation Index on July 1, 2022, and on each July 1 thereafter, or such lower
number as (i) shall be determined by the CFD Administrator as sufficient to provide the Authorized
Facilities under the authorized bonding program, or (ii) shall be determined by the Board of Directors
concurrently with a covenant that the CFD will not issue any more Bonds.
"Construction Inflation Index" means the annual percentage change in the Engineering News -
Record Building Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles, measured as of the calendar year which ends in
the previous Fiscal Year. In the event this index ceases to be published, the Construction Inflation Index
shall be another index as determined by the CFD Administrator that is reasonably comparable to the
Engineering News -Record Building Cost Index for the City of Los Angeles.
B-12
"Future Facilities Costs" means the CFD Public Facilities Amount minus (i) Bond proceeds
deposited in an Improvement Fund and (ii) other amounts (proceeds of the levy of Special Tax A,
interest earnings, etc.) held in an Improvement Fund that were available to fund such CFD Public
Facilities Amount prior to the date of prepayment.
"Improvement Fund" means any fund or account established under an Indenture to hold funds
which were or continue to be available for expenditure to pay costs of Authorized Facilities and any fund
or account established prior to the issuance of Bonds for such purpose.
"Outstanding Bonds" means the principal amount of all previously issued Bonds which will
remain outstanding after the payment from the amount of any Special Tax A that has therefore been
levied, excluding Bonds to be redeemed at a later date with the proceeds of prior prepayments of
Special Tax A.
Prepayment in Full
The Special Tax A obligation may be prepaid and permanently satisfied for (i) Assessor's Parcels
of Developed Property, (ii) Assessor's Parcels of Approved Property or Undeveloped Property for which
a Building Permit has been issued, (iii) Approved or Undeveloped Property for which a Building Permit
has not been issued, and (iv) Assessor's Parcels of Provisional Exempt Property that are not Exempt
Property pursuant to Section P. The Special Tax A obligation applicable to an Assessor's Parcel may be
fully prepaid and the obligation to pay the Special Tax A for such Assessor's Parcel permanently satisfied
as described herein; provided that a prepayment may be made only if there is no delinquent Special Tax
A previously levied on the Assessor's Parcel at the time of prepayment. An owner of an Assessor's Parcel
intending to prepay the Special Tax A obligation for such Assessor's Parcel shall provide the CFD
Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay, and within 5 Business Days of receipt of such
notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the amount of the non-refundable deposit
determined by the CFD Administrator to cover the cost to be incurred for the CFD in calculating the
Prepayment Amount (as defined below) for the Assessor's Parcel. Within 15 Business Days of receipt of
such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the Prepayment Amount
for the Assessor's Parcel. Prepayment must be made not less than 60 days prior to the redemption date
for any Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds of such prepaid Special Taxes.
The Prepayment Amount (defined below) shall be calculated as follows (capitalized terms are
defined below):
Bond Redemption Amount
plus
Redemption Premium
plus
Future Facilities Amount
plus
Defeasance Amount
plus
Administrative Fees and Expenses
less
Reserve Fund Credit
Equals: Prepayment Amount
The Prepayment Amount shall be determined as of the proposed prepayment date as follows:
1. Confirm that no Special Tax A delinquencies apply to such Assessor's Parcel.
B-13
2. For Developed Property, compute the Maximum Special Tax A for the Assessor's
Parcel. For Approved Property or Undeveloped Property for which a Building
Permit has been issued, compute the Maximum Special Tax A for the Assessor's
Parcel as though it was already designated as Developed Property, based upon
the Building Permit which has been issued for the Assessor's Parcel. For
Approved Property or Undeveloped Property for which a Building Permit has
not been issued or Provisional Exempt Property, compute the Maximum Special
Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel.
3. Divide the Maximum Special Tax A derived pursuant to paragraph 2 by the total
amount of Special Tax A that could be levied on all Taxable Property based on
the applicable Maximum Special Tax A, including for Approved Property or
Undeveloped Property for which a Building Permit has been issued, the
Maximum Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel as though it was already
designated as Developed Property. The calculation of the total amount of
Special Tax A shall exclude Assessor's Parcels for which the Special Tax A
obligation has been previously prepaid in full or the portion thereof that has
been previously prepaid in part.
4. Multiply the quotient derived pursuant to paragraph 3 by the principal amount
of the Outstanding Bonds to determine the amount of Outstanding Bonds to be
redeemed with the Prepayment Amount (the "Bond Redemption Amount").
5. Multiply the Bond Redemption Amount by the applicable redemption premium,
if any, on the Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed (the "Redemption Premium").
6. Determine the Future Facilities Costs.
7. Multiply the quotient derived pursuant to paragraph 3 by the amount
determined pursuant to paragraph 6 to determine the amount of Future
Facilities Costs for the Assessor's Parcel (the "Future Facilities Amount").
8. Determine the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption
Amount from the first bond interest and/or principal payment date following
the current Fiscal Year until the earliest redemption date for the Outstanding
Bonds on which Bonds can be redeemed from Special Tax prepayments.
9. Determine the Special Tax A levied on the Assessor's Parcel in the current Fiscal
Year which have not yet been paid.
10. Determine the amount the CFD Administrator reasonably expects to derive from
the investment of the Bond Redemption Amount and the Redemption Premium
from the date of prepayment until the redemption date for the Outstanding
Bonds to be redeemed with the Prepayment Amount.
11. Add the amounts derived pursuant to paragraphs 8 and 9 and subtract the
amount derived pursuant to paragraph 10 (the "Defeasance Amount").
B-14
12. Verify the administrative fees and expenses of the CFD, including the cost of
computation of the Prepayment Amount not funded from the deposit, the cost
to invest the Prepayment Amount, the cost of redeeming the Outstanding
Bonds, and the cost of recording notices to evidence the prepayment of the
Special Tax A obligation for the Assessor's Parcel and the redemption of
Outstanding Bonds (the "Administrative Fees and Expenses").
13. The reserve fund credit (the "Reserve Fund Credit") shall equal the lesser of: (a)
the expected reduction in the reserve requirement (as defined in the Indenture),
if any, associated with the redemption of Outstanding Bonds as a result of the
prepayment, or (b) the amount derived by subtracting the new reserve
requirement (as defined in the Indenture) in effect after the redemption of
Outstanding Bonds as a result of the prepayment from the balance in the
reserve fund on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less
than zero.
14. The Prepayment Amount is equal to the sum of the Bond Redemption Amount,
the Redemption Premium, the Future Facilities Amount, the Defeasance
Amount and the Administrative Fees and Expenses, less the Reserve Fund Credit.
15. From the Prepayment Amount, the Bond Redemption Amount, the Redemption
Premium, and Defeasance Amount shall be deposited into the appropriate fund
as established under the Indenture and be used to redeem Outstanding Bonds
or make debt service payments. The Future Facilities Amount shall be deposited
into the Improvement Fund. The Administrative Fees and Expenses shall be
retained by the CFD to be used for payment thereof.
The Prepayment Amount may be sufficient to redeem other than a $5,000 increment of Bonds.
In such event, the increment above $5,000 or an integral multiple thereof will be retained in the
appropriate fund established under the Indenture to be used with the next redemption from other
Special Tax A prepayments of Outstanding Bonds or to make debt service payments.
As a result of the payment of the current Fiscal Year's Special Tax A levy as determined pursuant
to paragraph 9 above, if applicable, the CFD Administrator shall remove the current Fiscal Year's Special
Tax A levy for the Assessor's Parcel from the County tax roll. With respect to any Assessor's Parcel for
which the Special Tax A obligation is prepaid, the Board shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in
compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of Special Tax A obligation and the release of the
lien securing the payment of Special Tax A for the Assessor's Parcel, and the obligation to pay the Special
Tax A for such Assessor's Parcel shall cease.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no Special Tax A prepayment shall be allowed unless the
amount of Maximum Special Tax A that may be levied on all Assessor's Parcels of Taxable Property,
excluding all Provisional Exempt Property and all Assessor's Parcels with delinquent Special Taxes, after
the proposed prepayment will be at least 1.1 times maximum annual debt service on the Bonds that will
remain outstanding after the prepayment plus the estimated annual Administrative Expenses, all as
determined by the CFD Administrator.
B-15
Tenders of Bonds in prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax A obligation may be accepted
upon the terms and conditions established by the Board pursuant to the Act. However, the use of Bond
tenders shall only be allowed on a case -by -case basis as specifically approved by the Board.
SECTION H
PARTIAL PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX A
The Special Tax A obligation for an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property, Approved Property
or Undeveloped Property may be partially prepaid. For purposes of determining the partial prepayment
amount, the provisions of Section G shall be modified as provided by the following formula:
PP = ((PE —A) x F) +A
These terms have the following meaning:
PP = Partial Prepayment
PE = the Prepayment Amount calculated according to Section G
F = the percent by which the owner of the Assessor's Parcel(s) is partially
prepaying the Maximum Special Tax A obligation
A = the Administrative Fees and Expenses determined pursuant to Section G
The owner of an Assessor's Parcel who desires to partially prepay the Special Tax A obligation
for the Assessor's Parcel shall notify the CFD Administrator of (i) such owner's intent to partially prepay
the Maximum Special Tax A obligation, and (ii) the percentage of the Maximum Special Tax A obligation
such owner wishes to prepay. Within 5 Business Days of receipt of such notice, the CFD Administrator
shall notify such property owner of the amount of the non-refundable deposit determined to cover the
cost to be incurred by the CFD in calculating the amount of a partial prepayment. Within 15 Business
Days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the
amount of the Partial Prepayment for the Assessor's Parcel. A Partial Prepayment must be made not less
than 60 days prior to the redemption date for any Outstanding Bonds to be redeemed with the proceeds
of the Partial Prepayment.
With respect to any Assessor's Parcel for which the Maximum Special Tax A obligation is partially
prepaid, the CFD Administrator shall (i) distribute the Partial Prepayment as provided in Paragraph 15 of
Section G and (ii) indicate in the records of the CFD that there has been a Partial Prepayment for the
Assessor's Parcel and that a portion of the Special Tax A obligation equal to the remaining percentage
(1.00 - F) of Special Tax A obligation will continue to be levied on the Assessor's Parcel pursuant to
Section F.
SECTION I
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B
1. Developed Property
Maximum Special Tax B
Each Fiscal Year, each Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property, Multifamily Residential
Property, or Non -Residential Property shall be subject to a Maximum Annual Special Tax B.
B-16
The Maximum Annual Special Tax B applicable to an Assessor's Parcel of Developed
Property shall be determined using the Table below.
B-17
TABLE 5
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX B RATES
FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Land Use Type
Maximum
Special Tax B
Residential Property
$459 per Unit
Multifamily Residential
Property
$10,644 per Acre
Non -Residential Property
$10,644 per Acre
2. Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Exempt Property
No Special Tax B shall be levied on Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, and
Provisional Exempt Property.
3. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax B
On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2022, the Maximum Special Tax B shall be increased
by an amount equal to five and six -tenths percent (5.6%) of the amount in effect for the
previous Fiscal Year.
4. Maximum Special Tax B at Transition Year
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Maximum Special Tax B for any
Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property shall be $0.00.
SECTION J
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX B
Commencing with Fiscal Year 2021-22 and for each following Fiscal Year, the Authority shall levy
the Special Tax B at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax B, Proportionately on each
Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property until the amount of Special Tax B equals the Special Tax B
Requirement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to Section 53321 (d) of the Act, the Special Tax B levied
against an Assessor's Parcel used for private residential purposes shall under no circumstances increase
more than ten (10%) as a consequence of delinquency of default by the owner of any other Assessor's
Parcel or Assessor's Parcels and shall, in no event, exceed the Maximum Special Tax B in effect for the
Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax B is being levied.
SECTION K
PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX B
No prepayments of Special Tax B are permitted.
B-18
SECTION L
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX C
1. Developed Property
Maximum Special Tax C
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, each Assessor's Parcel of
Residential Property, Multifamily Residential Property, or Non -Residential Property shall be
subject to a Maximum Special Tax C.
The Maximum Special Tax C applicable to an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property
shall be determined using the table below.
TABLE 6
MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX C RATES
FOR DEVELOPED PROPERTY
FISCAL YEAR 2021-22
Land Use Type
Maximum
Special Tax C
Residential Property
$975 per Unit
Multifamily Residential
Property
$22,609 per Acre
Non -Residential Property
$22,609 per Acre
2. Approved Property, Undeveloped Property and Provisional Exempt Property
No Special Tax C shall be levied on Approved Property, Undeveloped Property, and
Provisional Exempt Property.
3. Increase in the Maximum Special Tax C
On each July 1, commencing July 1, 2022, the Maximum Special Tax C shall be increased by an
amount equal to five and six -tenths percent (5.6%) of the amount in effect for the previous
Fiscal Year.
For each Fiscal Year following the Transition Year, the Maximum Special Tax C shall increase on
each subsequent July 1, by an amount equal to the greater of three percent (3.0%) or the
positive percentage change in CPI, over the amount in effect for the previous Fiscal Year, all as
determined by the CFD Administrator without additional action by the Board of Directors.
B-19
SECTION M
METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX C
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, the Authority shall levy the Special Tax C
at up to 100% of the applicable Maximum Special Tax C, Proportionately on each Assessor's Parcel of
Developed Property until the amount of Special Tax C equals the Special Tax C Requirement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to Section 53321 (d) of the Act, the Special Tax C levied
against an Assessor's Parcel used for private residential purposes shall under no circumstances increase
more than ten (10%) as a consequence of delinquency of default by the owner of any other Assessor's
Parcel or Assessor's Parcels and shall, in no event, exceed the Maximum Special Tax C in effect for the
Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax C is being levied.
SECTION N
PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX C
No prepayments of Special Tax C are permitted.
SECTION O
TERM OF THE SPECIAL TAX A, SPECIAL TAX B, AND SPECIAL TAX C
For each Fiscal Year that any Bonds are outstanding the Special Tax A shall be levied on all
Assessor's Parcels subject to the Special Tax A. If any delinquent Annual Special Tax A amounts remain
uncollected prior to or after the Transition Year, the Special Tax A may be levied to the extent necessary
to reimburse CFD 20-01 for uncollected Annual Special Tax A amounts associated with the levy of such
Special Tax A amounts, but not later than the 2061-62 Fiscal Year.
Prior to the Transition Year, Special Tax B shall be levied as long as the Authorized Services are
being provided. Special Tax B shall not be levied during or after the Transition Year.
For the Transition Year and each Fiscal Year thereafter, Special Tax C shall be levied in perpetuity
as long as the Authorized Services are being provided.
SECTION P
EXEMPT PROPERTY
The CFD Administrator shall classify as Exempt Property within the applicable Zone, (i)
Assessor's Parcels which are owned by, irrevocably offered for dedication, encumbered by or restricted
in use by the State of California, Federal or other local governments, including school districts, (ii)
Assessor's Parcels which are used as places of worship and are exempt from ad valorem property taxes
because they are owned by a religious organization, (iii) Assessor's Parcels which are owned by,
irrevocably offered for dedication, encumbered by or which make use as a dwelling unit, or otherwise,
infeasible by a homeowners' association, (iv) Assessor's Parcels with public or utility easements making
impractical their utilization for other than the purposes set forth in the easement, (v) Assessor's Parcels
which are privately owned and are encumbered by or restricted solely for public uses, or (vi) other types
of public uses determined by the CFD Administrator. The CFD Administrator shall classify such Assessor's
Parcels as Exempt Property in the chronological order in which property becomes Exempt.
B-20
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the CFD Administrator for purposes of levying the Special Tax
shall not, except for any Assessor's Parcel on which the Special Tax cannot be levied pursuant to the
Mello -Roos Act, classify an Assessor's Parcel as Exempt Property if such classification would reduce the
sum of all Taxable Property within the applicable Zone to less than the Acreage amounts listed in Table 6
below. Assessor's Parcels which cannot be classified as Exempt Property because such classification
would reduce the Acreage of all Taxable Property within the applicable Zone to less than the Acreage
amounts listed in Table 6 will be classified as Provisional Exempt Property, and will be subject to the levy
of Special Tax pursuant to Step Five in Section F.
No Special Tax shall be levied on any Assessor's Parcel in any Fiscal Year in which such Assessor's
Parcel is classified as Exempt Welfare Exemption Property.
TABLE 6
MINIMUM TAXABLE ACRES
Zone
Acres
Zone 1
6.78
Zone 2
4.75
Zone 3
2.31
SECTION Q
APPEALS AND INTERPRETATIONS
Any property owner claiming that the amount or application of the Annual Special Tax A, Annual
Special Tax B, or Annual Special Tax C is not correct may file a written notice of appeal with the CFD
Administrator not later than twelve months after having paid the first installment of the Annual Special
Tax A, Annual Special Tax B, or Annual Special Tax C that is disputed. The CFD Administrator shall
promptly review the appeal, and if necessary, meet with the property owner, consider written and oral
evidence regarding the amount of the Annual Special Tax A, Annual Special Tax B, or Annual Special Tax
C in dispute and rule on the appeal. If the CFD Administrator's decision requires that the Annual Special
Tax A, Annual Special Tax B, or Annual Special Tax C for an Assessor's Parcel be modified or changed in
favor of the property owner, a cash refund shall not be made (except for the last year of levy in the case
of the Annual Special Tax A), but an adjustment shall be made to the Annual Special Tax A, Annual
Special Tax B, or Annual Special Tax C on that Assessor's Parcel in the subsequent Fiscal Year(s).
The Board of Directors may interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Tax for
purposes of clarifying any ambiguity or to correct or supplement any defective or inconsistent provision
hereof.
SECTION R
MANNER OF COLLECTION
The Annual Special Tax A, Annual Special Tax B, and Annual Special Tax C shall be collected in the
same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, provided, however, that CFD
20-01 may collect the Annual Special Tax A, Annual Special Tax B, and Annual Special Tax C at a different
time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations.
B-21
ATTACHMENT A
1149 42lt
3321'
4'OJ'42'
y °shy
L-3d A5'
Fi•29A4'-'
h— 45 V7'14'
*
L-M.25'
P
gym'
{
ZONE 2
ZONE 3
{ate
ZONE i,
R-70W
L=�m'
19'49V 95.11'
�09 Yh7 �G�1'
4
J�
r1--1413.hh
r>,•1h'4r
L-39.2]'
R-MM'
trf.5'S'42'
L-51JE'
MAI
Zone 1: Tentative Tract Map No. 37509, Lots 1-111, Lots A (portion), U-X, Y (portion), Z and AC.
Zone 2: Tentative Tract Map No. 37509, Lots 121-142, Lots H (portion), J-S, T (portion), and Y
(portion).
Zone 3: Tentative Tract Map No. 37509, Lots 112-120, Lots A (portion), B-G, H (portion), I, T
(portion), Y (portion), AA and AB.
B-22
EXHIBIT C
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will
conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as practicable, in
the Temecula City Council chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, to consider the
following:
INTENT TO FORM
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
On February 23, 2021, the Board of Director's of the Temecula Public Financing Authority
adopted a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing
Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of
Special Taxes Therein — (Heirloom Farms)" (the "Resolution of Intention"). Reference is hereby made to
the Resolution of Intention on file in the office of the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority
for further particulars.
In the Resolution of Intention, the Board of Directors declared its intention to form the Temecula
Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) to fund costs of
certain public improvements and municipal services identified in an exhibit to the Resolution of Intention.
The proposed boundaries of the community facilities district were identified, and the Resolution of
Intention identified a proposed special tax to be levied on real property to be included in the community
facilities district to fund costs of the public improvements and the municipal services, and/or to pay debt
service on bonds to be issued, in a principal amount not to exceed $17,000,000, for the community
facilities district to finance costs of the public improvements.
In the Resolution of Intention, the Board of Directors provided that the levy of the special tax will
be subject to a mailed ballot election among the landowners in the community facilities district. The
Board of Directors authorized the Executive Director of the Temecula Public Financing Authority to
execute a joint community facilities agreement with the City of Temecula, the Temecula Valley Unified
School District, the Eastern Municipal Water District and any other public entity that will own and/or
operate any of the public improvements, or that will provide any of the services, to be funded by the
community facilities district, ordered the Director of Public Works of the City to prepare a report on the
community facilities district, and called for a public hearing on the community facilities district. The
Resolution of Intention also authorized the Executive Director of the Temecula Public Financing Authority
to execute an Acquisition Agreement with Meritage Homes of California, Inc. relative to the construction
and financing of improvements authorized to be financed by the community facilities district, in the form
on file with the Secretary of the Authority.
At the hearing, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the
establishment of the community facilities district, the extent of the community facilities district or the
furnishing of specified types of public improvements and services will be heard. Any person interested
may file a protest in writing with the Secretary of the Authority. If fifty percent or more of the registered
voters, or six registered voters, whichever is more, residing in the territory proposed to be included in the
community facilities district, or the owners of one-half or more of the area of land in the territory proposed
to be included in the community facilities district and not exempt from the special tax file written protests
C-1
against the establishment of the community facilities district and the protests are not withdrawn to reduce
the value of the protests to less than a majority, the Board of Directors of the Authority shall take no
further action to establish the community facilities district or authorize the special taxes for a period of one
year from the date of the decision of the Board of Directors, and if the majority protests of the registered
voters or the landowners are only against the furnishing of a type or types of public improvements or
services within the community facilities district, or against levying a specified special tax, those types of
public improvements or services, or the specified special tax, will be eliminated from the proceedings to
form the community facilities district.
Any person interested in these matters is invited to comment, using the procedures described
below, either for or against the above item. If you challenge the proposed action in court, you may be
limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice or in written correspondence delivered to the Board of Directors of the Authority at or prior to the
public hearing.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE COUNCIL MEETING
The Council meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent
with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19
pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be
found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public may only view the
meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments during the conduct
of the public hearing at the Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at
the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments must be submitted prior to the time public comments are
closed during the conduct of the public hearing. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as
would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments regarding the
above described matter for the April 13, 2021 Council meeting may only be submitted via email and
comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the
reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with
the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the
record of the Council meeting.
/s/ Randi Johl
Secretary, Temecula
Public Financing Authority
C-2
RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO INCUR BONDED
INDEBTEDNESS OF THE PROPOSED TEMECULA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS)
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. This Board of Directors has this date adopted its Resolution entitled "A
Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its
Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and To Authorize the Levy of Special
Taxes Therein — Heirloom Farms," stating its intention to form a community facilities district
pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Law"), for the purpose of
financing the costs of certain public improvements (the "Facilities"), and the costs of providing
certain municipal services.
Section 2. This Board of Directors estimates that in order to finance the Facilities it is
necessary to incur bonded indebtedness of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the "District") in the amount of not
to exceed $17,000,000.
Section 3. The bonded indebtedness is proposed to be incurred for the purpose of
financing all or a portion of the costs of the Facilities, including costs incidental to or connected
with the accomplishment of said purposes and of the financing thereof.
Section 4. This Board of Directors, acting as legislative body for the District, intends to
authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum aggregate principal amount of
$17,000,000, bearing interest payable semi-annually or in such other manner as this Board of
Directors shall determine, at a rate not to exceed the maximum rate of interest as may be
authorized by applicable law at the time of sale of such bonds, and maturing not to exceed forty
(40) years from the date of the issuance of said bonds.
Section 5. Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may
be heard, in the regular meeting place of this Board of Directors, City Council Chambers,
Temecula City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, be, and the same are hereby
appointed and fixed as the time and place when and where this Board of Directors, as legislative
body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the proposed debt issue and consider and
finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the issuance of
bonds of the Authority for the District.
Section 6. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause notice of said public hearing to be
given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation circulated within the District.
The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven (7) days before the date herein
set for said public hearing. The notice shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit A attached
hereto.
Section 7. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Public Financing Authority this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Maryann Edwards, Chair
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of
Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of
February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
EXHIBIT A
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
Notice is hereby given that the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority
will conduct a public hearing on Tuesday, April 13, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as
practicable, in the Temecula City Council chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula,
California, to consider the following:
INTENT TO INCUR INDEBTEDNESS
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
On February 23, 2021, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority
adopted a Resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public
Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention To Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Temecula
Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)" (the
"Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness"). Reference is hereby made to the Resolution of
Intention to Incur Indebtedness on file in the office of the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing
Authority for further particulars.
In the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness, the Board of Directors declared its
intention to authorize the issuance and sale of bonds in the maximum principal amount of
$17,000,000 for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01
(Heirloom Farms) to finance costs of certain public improvements. The testimony of all interested
persons, including all persons owning property in the area included in the proposed community
facilities district, for or against the proposed debt issuance will be heard at the public hearing.
Any person interested in these matters is invited to attend and present testimony either for or
against the above item. If you challenge the proposed action in court, you may be limited to raising
only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice or in
written correspondence delivered to the Board of Directors at or prior to the public hearing.
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION AT THE COUNCIL MEETING
The Council meeting will be conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means
consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the
COVID-19 pandemic. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online.
Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. In accordance with Executive Order N-29-20, the public
may only view the meeting on television and/or online and not in the Council Chamber.
Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments during the
conduct of the public hearing at the Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be
read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments must be submitted prior to the time public comments
are closed during the conduct of the public hearing. All email comments shall be subject to the same
rules as would otherwise govern speaker comments at the Council meeting. Electronic comments
regarding the above described matter for the April 13, 2021 Council meeting may only be submitted
via email and comments via text and social media (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) will not be accepted.
A-1
Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that
the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide,
consistent with the time limit for speakers at a Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall
become part of the record of the Council meeting.
/s/ Randi Johl
Secretary, Temecula
Public Financing Authority
A-2
RESOLUTION NO.2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY
FACILITIES AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE
FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the
"Authority") is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello -
Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority intends to
issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") in order to finance, among other
improvements, the costs of public improvements (the "Improvements") to be owned and/or
operated by the City of Temecula (the "City") described in the proceedings to form the CFD.
Section 2. The CFD is also expected to be authorized to fund certain maintenance
services (the "Services") described in the proceedings to form the CFD.
Section 3. In order to enable the CFD to finance the Improvements and the Services,
Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority
enter into a joint community facilities agreement prior to the adoption by the Authority of a
resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds, with respect to the portion of the Improvements
to be owned or operated, and with respect to the Services to be provided, by the City for the CFD.
Section 4. A form of joint community facilities agreement, by and between the City and
the Authority relating to the Improvements to be owned or operated by the City, and with respect
to the Services to be provided by the City for the CFD (the "Joint Community Facilities
Agreement") has been filed with the City Clerk.
Section 5. The City Council, with the assistance of City staff, has reviewed the Joint
Community Facilities Agreement, and the City Council now desires to approve the Joint
Community Facilities Agreement and direct its execution and delivery.
Section 6. The Authority expects to enter into an Acquisition Agreement (the
"Acquisition Agreement") with of the developer of the land in the CFD, whereby developer will
construct some of the Improvements to be acquired with the proceeds of the Bonds.
Section 7. The implementation of the Acquisition Agreement will involve actions by the
Director of Public Works of the City and certain other City officials, and the City Council now
desires to authorize City officials to assist in the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement.
Section 8. The City Council hereby approves the Joint Community Facilities Agreement
in the form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the City Manager to
execute and deliver the Joint Community Facilities Agreement in such form together with any
changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney
and Bond Counsel, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution
and delivery by the City Manager of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The City
Council hereby declares that the Joint Community Facilities Agreement will be beneficial to the
residents residing within the boundaries of the City.
Section 9. The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works and all other
appropriate officials of the City to assist the Authority in the implementation of the Acquisition
Agreement, and to perform those functions described in the Acquisition Agreement as to be
performed by officials of the City.
Section 10. The Mayor, City Manager, Director of Finance, the Director of Public Works
and City Clerk, and all other officers of the City, are hereby authorized and directed to take all
actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder to implement the Joint Community
Facilities Agreement and to assist the Authority in implementing the Acquisition Agreement,
including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates,
documents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and
not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution and such agreements.
Section 11. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
Quint & Thimmig LLP 1 /15/2021
1/18/2021
2/9/2021
JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT - CITY
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
This Joint Community Facilities Agreement - City (the "Agreement"), dated for
convenience as of March 1, 2021, is by and between the Temecula Public Financing Authority
(the "Authority") and the City of Temecula, California (the "Participating Agency").
RECITALS:
WHEREAS, the Authority is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public
Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD")
pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and the
Authority intends to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the 'Bonds") in order to finance
various public improvements to be acquired and constructed in the City of Temecula; and
WHEREAS, the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds may
include the improvements described in Attachment A hereto (the "Improvements"), which
Attachment is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and
WHEREAS, the CFD will also be authorized to finance certain maintenance services (the
"Services"), and the Participating Agency is willing to provide the Services to the extent it is
reimbursed for the costs thereof by the CFD; and
WHEREAS, some of the Improvements designated as the CFD Designated Facilities on
Attachment A (the "CFD Designated Facilities") are to be constructed by Meritage Homes of
California, Inc., the owner of the land in the CFD (the "Developer"), and the Authority expects
to enter into an Acquisition Agreement (the "Acquisition Agreement") with the Developer,
whereby the Authority will use proceeds of the Bonds to acquire the CFD Designated Facilities
from the Developer; and
WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Participating Agency will own and operate
the CFD Designated Facilities if they comply with the standards and have been completed to
the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and
WHEREAS, the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement will involve actions by
officials of the Participating Agency, and the Participating Agency is willing to provide the
services of its officials as necessary to implement the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement;
and
WHEREAS, the Improvements designated as the City Designated Facilities on
Attachment A (the "City Designated Facilities") will be determined, constructed, and owned
and operated by the Participating Agency, costs of which will be funded with Bond proceeds;
and
WHEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint
community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the
Authority of a resolution authorizing the issuance of the Bonds in respect of the Improvements
which Improvements are to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion,
20009.18:J17267
are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency, and in respect to the Services to be
provided by the Participating Agency; and
WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this
Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their
understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds, the Improvements, the Services and
the Acquisition Agreement, all as more particularly set forth below.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth
below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows:
Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. If and when it issues the Bonds, the Authority
intends to deposit a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an Acquisition Account (the
"Acquisition Account") of an Improvement Fund (the "Improvement Fund") for the CFD to be
available to finance a portion of the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and
construction of the CFD Designated Facilities, and to deposit a portion of the proceeds of the
Bonds to a City Account (the "City Account") of the Improvement Fund to finance costs of the
City Designated Facilities. Amounts in the Improvement Fund, including in the accounts
therein, together with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in the Improvement Fund
for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amount shall in no way be pledged as
security for the Bonds.
Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no
obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any
costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Any
costs of the CFD Designated Facilities listed in Attachment A hereto in excess of the proceeds of
the Bonds in the Acquisition Account and any earnings thereon while in the Acquisition
Account available to pay such costs will be paid by or on behalf of the Developer. Any costs of
the City Designated Facilities in excess of the proceeds of the Bonds in the City Account and
any earnings thereon while in the City Account available to pay such costs will be paid by the
Participating Agency.
The Participating Agency shall provide a credit against its development impact fees and
Quimby Act fees (together, the "City Development Fees") otherwise payable with respect to the
construction of attached and detached residential dwelling units in the territory of the CFD, on
a dollar for dollar basis, equal to amounts disbursed to the Participating Agency from the City
Account that are in excess of $750,000 (i.e. no credit in respect of the first $750,000 disbursed
from the City Account).
In the event that the Developer pays to the City either a public facility contribution in
the amount of $750,000 (the "Developer Contribution") or any of the City Development Fees
prior to the issuance of any Bonds, the City shall, promptly following the issuance of the Bonds,
rebate to the Developer the amount of the Developer Contribution and any City Development
Fees so paid.
Section 2. Construction of Improvements. (a) The CFD Designated Facilities have been
or will be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating
Agency. The Participating Agency shall not have any liability whatsoever in respect of any
work performed in connection with the CFD Designated Facilities; provided that this sentence
shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or
entities in respect of the acquisition or construction of the CFD Designated Facilities once the
Participating Agency accepts title to and control over the CFD Designated Facilities.
-2-
To the extent that the Participating Agency incurs expenses incident to reviewing and
approving design plans and specifications, conducting construction field inspections and
otherwise in connection with the design, construction and acceptance of the CFD Designated
Facilities, such expenses may be reimbursed to the Participating Agency upon presentation of
invoices as to the nature and amount of such costs and expenses, from available amounts in the
Acquisition Account, or if there are no such available funds, then from one of the owners of the
land in the CFD (as may be required in any applicable subdivision improvement agreements
pertaining thereto) or from any other legally available funds.
(b) The Participating Agency (i) shall determine the specific City Designated Facilities to
be funded in whole or in part with funds in the City Account, each of which shall have a useful
life of five years or longer, shall be owned by the Participating Agency or a governmental entity
(other than the federal government) in which no nongovernmental entity (or the federal
government) has any special legal entitlements; (ii) shall proceed with due diligence to
complete the improvements and to pay costs thereof from amounts in the City Account within
three years of the date of issuance of the Bonds; and (iii) reasonably expects to draw and expend
all amounts in the City Account within three years of the date of issuance of the Bonds. The
Participating Agency shall be responsible for the construction of the City Designated Facilities,
cost of which shall be paid from amounts in the City Account or from other lawfully available
funds of the Participating Agency.
Section 3. Inspection and Acceptance; Ownership. (a) The Participating Agency shall
cause inspections to be made during the construction of the CFD Designated Facilities in
accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon
completion of construction of the CFD Designated Facilities to the satisfaction of the
Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the CFD Designated
Facilities in accordance with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and
responsibility for operation of the CFD Designated Facilities conditioned upon the passage to
the Participating Agency of fee title clear of all encumbrances and easements not otherwise
acceptable to the Participating Agency in its sole discretion. The Participating Agency shall
have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the CFD Designated
Facilities unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the
Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any
of the CFD Designated Facilities.
(b) The Participating Agency shall own all of the City Designated Facilities during their
construction and upon their completion. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time
own or operate any of the City Designated Facilities.
(c) The Participating Agency shall not sell or lease all or any portion of the
Improvements, or grant any special legal entitlements to any of the Improvements, that would
cause the Authority to be in breach of its covenants related to the tax-exempt status of the
interest on the Bonds.
Section 4. Provision of Services. The Participating Agency hereby agrees to provide, or
cause to be provided, the Services authorized to be financed by the CFD and otherwise
identified in Attachment A hereto, but only to the extent and so long as proceeds of special
taxes levied in the CFD are made available to the Participating Agency for such purpose.
Section 5. Assistance with Acquisition Agreement. The Participating Agency hereby
agrees to assist the Authority in connection with the implementation of the Acquisition
Agreement by making its Director of Public Works and other officials available for the purposes,
-3-
on the terms and as otherwise provided for in the Acquisition Agreement with respect to any
actions to be performed by Participating Agency officials under the Acquisition Agreement.
Section 6. Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to
this Agreement shall be limited (a) with respect to the Improvements, to the amounts on deposit
in the Acquisition Account and the City Account of the Improvement Fund and described in
Section 1 above, and (b) with respect to the Services, to the proceeds of special taxes levied in
the CFD for such purpose and otherwise collected from the property owners in the CFD. No
Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable
hereunder.
The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the CFD
Designated Facilities shall be to inspect and accept the CFD Designated Facilities as described
above, and as otherwise provided in Section 3(c) above. The Participating Agency shall have no
responsibility or obligation with respect to the CFD Designated Facilities for any action
occurring prior to acceptance by the Participating Agency. If, for any reason whatsoever, there
are insufficient funds to complete the CFD Designated Facilities or any portion thereof, the
Participating Agency shall have no obligation under this Agreement to fund any such shortfall.
The sole obligation of the Participating Agency with respect to the City Designated
Improvements shall be as set forth in Sections 2(b) and 3(b) and (c) above.
The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the Services
shall be to provide all or such portion of the Services as the Participating Agency shall
determine can be provided for in respect of any special tax revenue from the CFD made
available to the Participating Agency for such purpose.
The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the
Acquisition Agreement shall be to make available officials of the Participating Agency
specifically referenced in, and for the tasks specifically to be undertaken by such officials under
the terms of, the Acquisition Agreement.
If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole
remedy of the Authority shall be the commencement of an action in the Superior Court for
specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations.
Section 7. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this
Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the Bonds are not issued by
December 31, 2023. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this
Agreement shall terminate: (a) as to the Improvements, upon acceptance of the ownership and
operation of the CFD Designated Facilities by the Participating Agency, and disbursement of all
amounts from the Improvement Fund to pay costs of the Improvements, and (b) as to the
Services, when the special taxes are no longer levied on the property owners in the CFD.
Section 8. No Obligation to Form CFD; Agreement of Benefit to Residents. The
provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD or to issue
the Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, by their respective execution of this Agreement, the
Authority and the Participating Agency each declare that this Agreement is beneficial to the
residents within the jurisdiction of their respective entities in assuring the provision of financing
for a portion of the costs of the Improvements and the Services in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act.
-4-
Section 9. Partial Invalidity. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or
unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be
given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible.
Section 10. Successors and Assigns; Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto.
This Agreement is for the benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and
their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary
hereof or have an interest herein; provided, however, that notwithstanding the foregoing
Meritage Homes of California, Inc. is a third party beneficiary of the third and fourth
paragraphs of Section 1 above and shall have the right to enforce such provision against the
Participating Agency, but solely by an action for specific performance.
Section 11. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
-5-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day
and year written alongside their signature below.
20009.18:J17267
CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Participating
Agency")
By:
Aaron Adams,
City Manager
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY (the "Authority")
in
Aaron Adams,
Executive Director
[signature page to CFD 20-01 - Joint Community Facilities Agreement - City]
S-1
ATTACHMENT A
DESCRIPTION OF THE IMPROVEMENTS
CFD Designated Facilities
• Streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping and traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters
and driveways), including Temecula Center Drive and Ynez Road within and in the vicinity of
the CFD; stormwater drainage systems (including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels,
structures, junctions, manholes, catch basins and related dewatering); street light improvements
(including light fixtures, substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street
signage (including traffic, stop and street name signs).
• Traffic signal improvements, including traffic signal interconnection and video surveillance
systems, at the intersection of Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of Temecula
Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances.
City Designated Facilities
• Capital improvements included in the City of Temecula's adopted Capital Improvement
Program for Fiscal Years 2021-2025.
DESCRIPTION OF THE SERVICES
• Public safety services, including police and fire protection.
• Maintenance of parks, and landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way
in or near the area of the CFD, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of
planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for
irrigation.
• Maintenance of public signage in or near the CFD.
• Maintenance of storm drainage systems within or serving the area of the CFD, and including
storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets,
cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection.
• Maintenance of sidewalks, streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the area of the CFD,
and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping.
• Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the CFD, and including
decorative lighting and pull box assemblies.
• Maintenance of traffic signals, and traffic signal interconnection and video surveillance systems,
within and in the vicinity of the CFD, and including electrical, LED replacement, maintenance
and replacement.
• Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the CFD.
A-1
Quint & Thimmig LLP
1/15/21
2/9/21
ACQUISITION AGREEMENT
by and between the
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
and
MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
dated as of , 2021
relating to:
Temecula Public Financing Authority
Community Facilities District No. 20-01
(Heirloom Farms)
20009.18:J17265
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section1.01. Definitions.........................................................................................................................................................1
ARTICLE II
RECITALS
Section2.01.
The CID ............................................................................................................................................................. 3
Section2.02.
The Development............................................................................................................................................. 3
Section2.03.
The Facilities...................................................................................................................................................... 4
Section2.04.
The Financing.................................................................................................................................................... 4
Section2.05.
The Bonds.......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Section 2.06.
No Advantage to Authority Construction.................................................................................................... 4
Section2.07.
Agreements....................................................................................................................................................... 4
ARTICLE III
FUNDING
Section3.01.
Authority Proceedings..................................................................................................................................... 4
Section3.02.
Bonds.................................................................................................................................................................. 5
Section3.03.
Bond Proceeds................................................................................................................................................... 5
Section3.04.
Refunding Bonds.............................................................................................................................................. 6
ARTICLE IV
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
Section4.01.
Plans................................................................................................................................................................... 6
Section 4.02.
Construction of Facilities................................................................................................................................. 6
Section 4.03.
Relationship to Public Works; Bidding Requirements............................................................................... 7
Section 4.04.
Independent Contractor; No Joint Venture.................................................................................................. 8
Section 4.05.
Performance and Payment Bonds.................................................................................................................. 8
Section 4.06.
Contracts and Change Orders........................................................................................................................ 8
Section4.07.
Time for Completion........................................................................................................................................ 9
ARTICLE V
ACQUISITION AND PAYMENT
Section5.01. Inspection.......................................................................................................................................................... 9
Section 5.02. Agreement to Sell and Purchase Facilities.................................................................................................... 9
Section5.03. Payment Requests............................................................................................................................................ 9
Section 5.04. Processing Payment Requests......................................................................................................................10
Section5.05. Payment...........................................................................................................................................................10
Section 5.06. Restrictions on Payments..............................................................................................................................11
Section 5.07. Acquisition of Additional Facilities.............................................................................................................13
Section 5.08. Defective or Nonconforming Work.............................................................................................................14
Section 5.10. Right of City to Make Withdrawals From Improvement Fund..............................................................14
ARTICLE VI
OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER OF FACILITIES
Section 6.01.
Facilities to be Owned by the City — Conveyance of Land and Easements to City..............................14
Section 6.02.
Facilities to be Owned by the City — Title Evidence..................................................................................14
Section 6.03.
Facilities Constructed on Private Lands.....................................................................................................15
Section 6.04.
Facilities Constructed on City Land............................................................................................................15
Section 6.05.
Facilities to be Acquired by Other Public Agencies..................................................................................15
Section 6.06.
Maintenance and Warranties........................................................................................................................15
ARTICLE VII
INSURANCE; RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGE
Section 7.01.
Liability Insurance Requirements................................................................................................................16
Section7.02.
Responsibility for Damage............................................................................................................................18
-i-
ARTICLE VIII
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
Section 8.01.
Representations, Covenants and Warranties of RVR...............................................................................19
Section 8.02.
Indemnification and Hold Harmless...........................................................................................................
21
ARTICLE IX
TERMINATION
Section 9.01.
Termination of Funding Obligations...........................................................................................................
22
Section9.02.
Mutual Consent..............................................................................................................................................
22
Section 9.03.
Authority Election for Cause........................................................................................................................
22
Section9.04.
Force Majeure..................................................................................................................................................
23
Section 9.05.
Survival of Certain Provisions......................................................................................................................
23
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 10.01.
Limited Liability of Authority......................................................................................................................
24
Section10.02.
Excess Costs.....................................................................................................................................................
24
Section10.03.
Audit................................................................................................................................................................
24
Section10.04.
Attorney's Fees...............................................................................................................................................
24
Section10.05.
Notices.............................................................................................................................................................
24
Section10.06.
Severability......................................................................................................................................................
24
Section 10.07.
Successors and Assigns.................................................................................................................................
25
Section10.08.
Other Agreements..........................................................................................................................................
25
Section10.09.
Waiver..............................................................................................................................................................25
Section10.10.
Merger..............................................................................................................................................................
25
Section10.11.
Parties in Interest............................................................................................................................................
25
Section10.12.
Amendment....................................................................................................................................................
25
Section10.13.
Counterparts...................................................................................................................................................
26
Section10.14.
Governing Law...............................................................................................................................................
26
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR ACQUISITION FROM THE DEVELOPER
EXHIBIT B
FACILITIES AND RELATED BUDGETED COSTS
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST
THIS ACQUISITION AGREEMENT (the "Acquisition Agreement"), dated as of
, 2021, is by and between (i) the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a joint
exercise of powers authority organized and existing under the laws of the State of California
(the "Authority"), for and on behalf of the Authority's Community Facilities District No. 20-01
(Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD"), and (ii) Meritage Homes of California, Inc., a California
corporation (the "Developer").
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section 1.01. Definitions. The following capitalized terms shall have the meanings
given to them in this Section 1.01 for purposes of this Acquisition Agreement. Unless otherwise
indicated, any other terms, capitalized or not, when used herein shall have the meanings given
to them in the Fiscal Agent Agreement (as hereinafter defined).
"Acceptable Title" means title to land or interest therein, in form acceptable to the
Director of Public Works, which title or interest is free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments,
leases, easements and encumbrances, whether or not recorded, but subject to any exceptions
determined by the Director of Public Works as not interfering with the actual or intended use of
the land or interest therein. Notwithstanding the foregoing, an irrevocable offer of dedication
may constitute land with an "Acceptable Title" if: (i) such offer is necessary to satisfy a
condition to a tentative or final parcel map, (ii) such offer is in a form acceptable to the Director
of Public Works, (iii) the Director of Public Works has no reason to believe that such offer of
dedication will not be accepted by the applicable public agency, and (iv) the Developer commits
in writing not to allow any liens to be imposed on such property prior to its formal acceptance
by the applicable public agency.
"Acceptance Date" means the date the City Council of the City (or other public entity
which is to own a Facility) takes final action to accept dedication of or transfer of title to a
Facility.
"Acquisition Agreement" means this Acquisition Agreement, together with any
Supplement hereto.
"Act" means the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of
the California Government Code, as amended.
"Actual Cost" means the substantiated cost of a Facility, which costs may include: (i) the
costs (evidenced by payments to parties unrelated to the Developer, or, in the event that the
Developer avails itself of the provisions of Section 4.03(C), determined by reference to the
written contract to be entered into with the Developer as referenced in said Section) incurred by
the Developer for the construction of such Facility, (ii) the reasonable costs incurred by the
Developer in preparing the Plans for such Facility and the related costs of design, engineering
and environmental evaluations of the Facility, (iii) the fees paid to governmental agencies for
obtaining permits, licenses or other governmental approvals for such Facility, (iv) professional
costs incurred by the Developer associated with such Facility, such as engineering, architecture,
landscape architecture, legal, accounting, inspection, construction staking, materials testing and
similar professional services; (v) costs directly related to the construction and / or acquisition of
a Facility, such as costs of payment, performance and/or maintenance bonds, and insurance
costs related to Facilities (including costs of any title insurance required hereunder, but not
including the cost of any insurance described in Section 7.01 of this Acquisition Agreement);
-1-
and (vi) the out-of-pocket cost to the Developer of any real property or interest therein that the
Developer must acquire from one or more entities that are not Affiliates of the Developer and
which acquisition is required for the construction of a Facility and which real property or
interest therein is required to be conveyed to the public entity that will own or operate such
Facility. Actual Cost may include an amount not in excess of five percent (5%) of the cost
described in clause (i) of the preceding sentence in respect of any construction, project
management or other similar fee payable to the Developer or any party related thereto. Actual
Cost shall not include any financing fees, costs or charges, or any interest, cost of carry or other
similar charges.
"Affiliate" means any entity with respect to which fifty percent (50%) or more of the
ownership or voting power is held individually or collectively by the Developer and any other
entity owned, controlled or under common ownership or control by or with, as applicable, the
Developer, and includes the managing member of any entity that is a limited liability company,
and includes all general partners of any entity which is a partnership. Control shall mean
ownership of fifty percent (50%) or more of the voting power of or ownership interest in the
respective entity.
"Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a joint exercise of powers
agency duly created and existing under the laws of the State.
"Bonds" means any bonds issued by the Authority under the Act for the CFD, proceeds
of which are deposited to the Improvement Fund to be used to pay costs of the Facilities.
"Budgeted Cost" means the estimated cost of a Facility as shown on Exhibit B hereto.
"CFD" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District
No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms), created by the Board of Directors of the Authority under the Act.
"City" means the City of Temecula, California.
"City Attorney" means the attorney, or firm of attorneys, serving in the capacity of City
Attorney for the City.
"Conditions of Approval" means the conditions of approvals and mitigation measures
imposed in connection with the granting of the land use entitlements for the development of
land in the CFD, and any subdivision improvement, development or other agreement with the
City relating to the development of the land in the CFD or the installation of the Facilities.
"County" means the County of Riverside, California.
"Developer" means Meritage Homes of California, Inc., a California corporation, and its
successors and assigns to the extent permitted under Section 10.07 hereof.
"Director of Public Works" means the Director of Public Works of the City, or his
written designee acting as such under this Acquisition Agreement.
"Facilities" means the public facilities described in Exhibit A hereto which are eligible to
be financed by the CFD.
"Fiscal Agent" means an entity acting as fiscal agent under a Fiscal Agent Agreement, or
any successor thereto acting as fiscal agent under a Fiscal Agent Agreement.
-2-
"Fiscal Agent Agreement" means any agreement by that name, between the Authority
for the CFD and the Fiscal Agent, providing for, among other matters, the issuance of the Bonds
and the establishment of the Improvement Fund, as executed and as it may thereafter amended
and supplemented in accordance with its terms.
"Improvement Fund" means (a) prior to the date of issuance of any Bonds, a fund
maintained by the Authority into which it will deposit Special Taxes in accordance with section
3.04 hereof; and (b) from and after the issuance of any Bonds, an Acquisition Account within the
Improvement Fund established by a Fiscal Agent Agreement. During the period in which the
Improvement Fund is to be maintained by the Authority, it may be maintained as a component
of any other fund maintained by the Authority and funds therein may be commingled with
other Authority funds for investment and safekeeping purposes, so long as the Authority
maintains separate records for the amounts deposited thereto, any investment earnings thereon,
and any amounts withdrawn therefrom.
"Payment Request" means a document, substantially in the form of Exhibit C hereto, to
be used by the Developer in requesting payment of a Purchase Price.
"Plans" means the plans, specifications, schedules and related construction contracts for
the Facilities approved pursuant to the applicable standards of the City or other entity that will
own, operate or maintain the Facilities when completed and acquired. As of the date of this
Acquisition Agreement, the City standards for construction incorporate those set forth in the
Green Book, Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC), adopted by
Public Works Standards, Inc., as modified by any applicable City Special Provisions.
"Purchase Price" means the amount paid by the Authority for a Facility determined in
accordance with Article V hereof, being an amount equal to the Actual Cost of such Facility, but
subject to the limitations and reductions provided for in Article V.
"Risk Manager" shall mean the person acting in the capacity of Risk Manager for the
City.
"State" means the State of California.
"Supplement" means a written document amending, supplementing or otherwise
modifying this Acquisition Agreement and any exhibit hereto, including any amendments to
the list of Facilities in Exhibit B, and / or the addition to Exhibit B of additional Facilities to be
financed with the proceeds of the Bonds deposited in the Improvement Fund.
ARTICLE II
RECITALS
Section 2.01. The CFD. The Board of Directors of the Authority has established the
CFD under the Act for the financing of, among other things, the acquisition, construction and
installation of public facilities identified in the proceedings to form the CFD, which include the
Facilities listed in Exhibit A hereto.
Section 2.02. The Development. The Developer, together with other entities, is
developing land located within the CFD.
-3-
Section 2.03. The Facilities. The Facilities are within or in the vicinity of the CFD, and
the Authority and the Developer will benefit from a coordinated plan of design, engineering
and construction of the Facilities and the development of the land that is located within the
CFD. The Developer acknowledges that the inclusion of Facilities in Exhibit A hereto in no
way, in itself, obligates the Authority to use any funds in the Improvement Fund to finance the
Facilities or implies that the Authority has in any way engaged the Developer to construct the
Facilities, except as specifically provided in this Acquisition Agreement. The Facilities which
are the subject of acquisition from the Developer under this Acquisition Agreement are only the
Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto, as such Exhibit may be amended and / or supplemented by
any Supplement; however, this Acquisition Agreement shall in no way, by itself, obligate the
Developer to construct any of the Facilities.
Section 2.04. The Financing. The Developer and the Authority wish to finance the
acquisition, construction and installation of some of the Facilities and the payment therefor by
entering into this Acquisition Agreement for the acquisition of the Facilities and therefor as
shown in Exhibit B hereto (as it may be amended and supplemented) with funds deposited to
the Improvement Fund.
Section 2.05. The Bonds. The Authority is proceeding with the authorization and
issuance of the first series of the Bonds for the CFD under the Act and the Fiscal Agent
Agreement, the proceeds of which Bonds shall be used, in part, to finance the acquisition of all
or a portion of the Facilities. The execution by the Authority of this Acquisition Agreement in
no way obligates the Authority to issue any Bonds, or the City to acquire any Facilities financed
with proceeds of any Bonds issued, except the Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto which are to
be acquired subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement.
Section 2.06. No Advantage to Authority Construction. The Authority, by its approval
of this Acquisition Agreement, has determined that it will obtain no advantage from
undertaking the construction by the Authority directly of the Facilities, and that the provisions
of this Acquisition Agreement require that any Facilities to be constructed by the Developer be
so constructed by the Developer as if they had been constructed under the direction and
supervision of the Authority. The Developer hereby represents that it has experience in the
supervision of the construction of public facilities of the character of the Facilities.
Section 2.07. Agreements. In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants set
forth herein, and for other valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, the Authority and the Developer agree that the foregoing recitals, as
applicable to each, are true and correct and further make the agreements set forth herein.
ARTICLE III
FUNDING
Section 3.01. Authority Proceedings. The Authority shall conduct all necessary
proceedings under the Act for the issuance, sale and delivery of one or more of the Bonds for
the CFD; provided, however, that nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the Authority
to issue any of the Bonds for the CFD. Upon the written request of the Developer, the
Developer and the Authority staff shall meet regarding the amount, timing and other material
aspects of the Bonds for the CFD, but the legal proceedings and the principal amount, interest
rates, terms and conditions and timing of the sale of the Bonds for the CFD shall be in all
respects subject to the approval of the Board of Directors of the Authority.
-4-
Section 3.02. Bonds. The Authority shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price of
the Facilities except from amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund. The Authority makes
no warranty, express or implied, that the proceeds of the Bonds deposited and held in the
Improvement Fund, and any investment earnings thereon deposited to the Improvement Fund,
will be sufficient for payment of the Purchase Price of all of the Facilities.
The Developer agrees to assist the Authority in the preparation of any disclosure
document or continuing disclosure agreement deemed necessary by the Authority to issue the
Bonds, including but not limited to the submission of information reasonably requested by the
Authority's disclosure counsel, any appraiser or any market absorption consultant in
connection with the preparation of disclosure materials for the sale of the Bonds, and the
provision of such continuing disclosure obligations, certifications and legal opinions as may be
reasonably required by the underwriter of the Bonds.
Section 3.03. Bond Proceeds. The proceeds of each series of the Bonds shall be
deposited, held, invested, reinvested and disbursed as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
A portion of the proceeds of the Bonds will be set aside under the Fiscal Agent Agreement in
the Improvement Fund. Moneys in the Improvement Fund shall be withdrawn therefrom in
accordance with the provisions of the Fiscal Agent Agreement and the provisions hereof for
payment of all or a portion of the costs of construction and/or acquisition of the Facilities, all as
herein provided.
The Developer agrees that the Authority alone shall direct the investment of the funds
on deposit in the funds and accounts established by or pursuant to the Fiscal Agent Agreement,
including the Improvement Fund, and that the Developer has no right whatsoever to direct
investments under the Fiscal Agent Agreement. The Authority shall have no responsibility
whatsoever to the Developer with respect to any investment of funds made by the Fiscal Agent
under the Fiscal Agent Agreement, including any loss of all or a portion of the principal
invested or any penalty for liquidation of an investment. Any such loss may diminish the
amounts available in the Improvement Fund to pay the Purchase Price of Facilities hereunder.
The Developer further acknowledges that the obligation of any owner of real property in the
CFD, including the Developer to the extent it owns any real property in the CFD, to pay special
taxes levied in the CFD is not in any way dependent on: (i) the availability of amounts in the
Improvement Fund to pay for all or any portion of the Facilities hereunder, or (ii) the alleged or
actual misconduct of the Authority in the performance of its obligations under this Acquisition
Agreement, the Fiscal Agent Agreement, any developer agreement or amendment thereto or
any other agreement to which the Developer and the City or the Authority are signatories.
The Developer acknowledges that any lack of availability of amounts in the
Improvement Fund to pay the Purchase Price of Facilities shall in no way diminish any
obligation of the Developer with respect to the construction of or contributions for public
facilities required by this Acquisition Agreement, the Conditions of Approval or any
development or other agreement to which the Developer is a party, or any governmental
approval to which the Developer or any land within the CFD is subject.
Section 3.04. Special Taxes. The Authority agrees, when and if the CFD is formed, to
levy the Special Taxes on property in the CFD in accordance with the Rate and Method of
Apportionment; provided that Special Taxes shall be levied solely on Developed Property (as
defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment) pursuant to Step One in Section F of the
Rate and Method of Apportionment. The Authority agrees to deposit any Special Taxes
received by it prior to the issuance of any Bonds, after deducting any Administrative Expenses
(as defined in the Rate and Method of Apportionment) theretofore incurred and expected to be
incurred in the then Fiscal Year, in the Improvement Fund.
-5-
On the date of issuance of the first series of the Bonds, the Authority shall transfer all
amounts then held by it in the Improvement Fund maintained by it as described in clause (a) of
the definition of "Improvement Fund" in Section 1.01 hereof to the Fiscal Agent for deposit by
the Fiscal Agent to the Improvement Fund established under the Fiscal Agent Agreement for
such Bonds. Proceeds of Bonds in any Improvement Fund shall be used for payments to the
Developer hereunder prior to the use of Special Taxes deposited thereto, except as may
otherwise be provided in any Fiscal Agent Agreement pursuant to which the Bonds were
issued.
Section 3.05. Refunding Bonds. The Authority may, in its sole and absolute discretion,
determine at any time to issue bonds the net proceeds of which are used to refund any
outstanding Bonds (the term "refund" as used in this sentence, and the term "refunding" as
used in the next sentence, includes any purchase in lieu of redemption of any Bonds). The
Developer shall have no right whatsoever in connection with any such refunding bond issue,
including but not limited to any right to any reduction in special taxes levied or to be levied by
the CFD, or to any additional funds whether pursuant to this Acquisition Agreement or
otherwise as a consequence of any such refunding.
Section 3.06. Fee Credits. The Authority and the City are parties to a Joint Community
Facilities Agreement - City, dated as of March 1, 2021 (the "City JCFA" ), with respect to certain
matters pertaining to the CFD. The Authority hereby acknowledges the provisions of the third
and fourth paragraphs of Section 1 of the City JCFA and agrees with the provisions thereof.
ARTICLE IV
CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES
Section 4.01. Plans. The Developer shall obtain the written approval of the Plans to be
prepared for the Facilities listed in Exhibit B in accordance with applicable ordinances and
regulations of the City and / or the public entity that will own and operate the Facilities. Copies
of all Plans shall be provided by the Developer to the Director of Public Works upon request
therefor, and, in any event, as built drawings and a written assignment of the Plans for any
Facility listed in Exhibit B shall be provided to the City prior to its acceptance of the Facility.
Section 4.02. Construction of Facilities. All Facilities to be acquired hereunder
specified in Exhibit B hereto, as amended from time to time, shall be constructed by or at the
direction of the Developer in accordance with the approved Plans and the Conditions of
Approval. The Developer shall perform all of its obligations hereunder and shall conduct all
operations with respect to the construction of Facilities in a good, workmanlike and
commercially reasonable manner, with the standard of diligence and care normally employed
by duly qualified persons utilizing their best efforts in the performance of comparable work and
in accordance with generally accepted practices appropriate to the activities undertaken. The
Developer shall require that each general contractor performing work in connection with the
Facilities employ at all times adequate staff or consultants with the requisite experience
necessary to administer and coordinate all work related to the design, engineering, acquisition,
construction and installation of the Facilities to be acquired from the Developer hereunder. The
Developer shall at all times have adequate staff or consultants with the requisite experience and
licenses to discharge its obligations under this Acquisition Agreement.
As a condition to the acquisition of the Facilities to be completed by the Developer, the
Developer shall: (i) construct and cause conveyance to the City (or other applicable
governmental agency) all Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto in accordance with the provisions
W
of this Acquisition Agreement and the Conditions of Approval, and (ii) use its own funds to pay
all costs thereof in excess of the Purchase Prices thereof to be paid therefor hereunder, except as
may otherwise expressly provided in the Conditions of Approval.
The Developer hereby acknowledges that (i) because of the limitations imposed by
Section 5.06 hereof, the Purchase Price for any Facility may be less than the Actual Cost, or cost
to the Developer, of such Facility, and (ii) there may be insufficient funds in the Improvement
Fund to pay the Purchase Prices of all of the Facilities listed in Exhibit B, and, in any event, this
Acquisition Agreement shall not affect any obligation of any owner of land in the CFD under
the Conditions of Approval with respect to the public improvements required in connection
with the development of the land within the CFD.
Section 4.03. Relationship to Public Works; Bidding Requirements. The following
shall apply to all contracts applicable to the Facilities acquired with funds withdrawn from the
Improvement Fund:
A. General. This Acquisition Agreement is for the acquisition of the Facilities
listed in Exhibit B hereto from moneys in the Improvement Fund and is not intended to
be a public works contract. The Authority and the Developer agree that the Facilities are
of local, and not state-wide concern, and that the provisions of the California Public
Contract Code shall not apply to the construction of the Facilities. The Authority and
the Developer agree that the Developer shall award all contracts for the construction of
the Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto and that this Acquisition Agreement is necessary
to assure the timely and satisfactory completion of such Facilities and that compliance
with the Public Contract Code with respect to such Facilities would work an incongruity
and would not produce an advantage to the Authority or the CFD. The Developer
acknowledges that State prevailing wage laws apply to any contracts and any
subcontracts for the construction of the Facilities, and that it shall at all times assure
compliance with Section 8.01 G. hereof.
B. Bidding Procedures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer shall
award all contracts for construction of the Facilities listed in Exhibit B, and materials
related thereto, by means of a bid process consistent with this Section 4.03 B. or
otherwise acceptable to the Director of Public Works, in each case consistent with
applicable City regulations. The Developer shall establish a list of written criteria
acceptable to the Director of Public Works (including experience, ability to perform on
schedule and financial ability) to determine qualified contractors for any contract. Such
general contractors shall comply with any applicable City regulations. Formal bids shall
be requested from those entities on the list of qualified contractors.
The Developer shall prepare bid packages, including engineering reports and
estimates, for each of the Facilities, and shall submit such packages to the Director of
Public Works, reasonably in advance of the anticipated bid, for review. Upon agreement
by the Director of Public Works and the Developer on the content of such bid packages
and a schedule of bid prices, plus an acceptable margin of variance, the Developer may
proceed to take bids on the applicable Facilities. At the reasonable request of the
Developer, the Director of Public Works shall also meet with the qualified general
contractors to discuss the requirements of the particular contract to be bid.
Bids for each Facility shall be submitted to the Director of Public Works prior to
the time and date prescribed for bid opening. If a bid is within the constraints of the
approved bid package, the Developer shall award the applicable contract to the lowest
responsible bidder; provided, however, that the Developer shall have the right to reject
-7-
all bids and to rebid the work for any Facility. If all bids are in excess of the bid
parameters, the Developer shall obtain the consent of the Director of Public Works prior
to awarding the contract. Upon written request of the Director of Public Works, the
Developer shall provide an analysis of bids for construction and materials for the
Facilities, indicating how the winning bid was determined and how it was consistent
with the applicable bid package. The Developer shall promptly publish notice of the
award of any contract in such paper as the Director of Public Works shall specify.
C. Scheduling. The Developer shall develop or cause to be developed and
shall maintain or cause to be maintained a schedule, using the critical path method, for
the construction of the Facilities to be acquired hereunder. The Developer shall provide
the Director of Public Works with a complete copy of the schedule and with each update
to the schedule for the review by the Director of Public Works.
D. Periodic Meetings. From time to time (expected to be at least every two
weeks) at the request of the Director of Public Works, representatives of the Developer
shall meet and confer with City staff, consultants and contractors regarding matters
arising hereunder with respect to the Facilities, and the progress in constructing and
acquiring the same, and as to any other matter related to the Facilities or this Acquisition
Agreement. The Developer shall advise the Director of Public Works in advance of any
coordination and scheduling meetings to be held with contractors relating to the
Facilities, in the ordinary course of performance of an individual contract. The Director
of Public Works or the Director of Public Work's designated representative shall have
the right to be present at such meetings, and to meet and confer with individual
contractors if deemed advisable by the Director of Public Works to resolve disputes
and / or ensure the proper completion of the Facilities.
Section 4.04. Independent Contractor; No Joint Venture. In performing this
Acquisition Agreement, the Developer is an independent contractor and not the agent or
employee of the Authority, the City or the CFD. None of the Authority, the City or the CFD
shall be responsible for making any payments directly or otherwise to any contractor,
subcontractor, agent, consultant, employee or supplier of the Developer.
The Developer hereby acknowledges and agrees that the City, the Authority and the
CFD, on the one hand, and the Developer, on the other, are not joint venturers or partners in the
construction, acquisition, and / or installation of the Facilities, and nothing in this Acquisition
Agreement shall be construed as implying any sort of joint venture or partnership relationship
between the City, Authority and / or the CFD, and the Developer or any other entity involved in
the construction, acquisition and / or installation of any of the Facilities.
Section 4.05. Performance and Payment Bonds. The Developer agrees to comply with
all applicable performance and payment bonding requirements of the Authority (and other
applicable public entities and / or public utilities) with respect to the construction of the
Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto. Performance and payment bonds shall not be required of
the Developer to the extent moneys are available in the Improvement Fund to pay the Purchase
Price of a Facility (and consistent with the Budgeted Costs therefore shown in Exhibit B and the
limitations expressed in Section 5.06 hereof); provided that all contractors and / or
subcontractors employed by the Developer in connection with the construction of Facilities shall
provide a labor and materials and performance bonds which name the Authority and the City
as additional insureds.
Section 4.06. Contracts and Change Orders. The Developer shall be responsible for
entering into all contracts and any supplemental agreements (commonly referred to as "change
In
orders') required for the construction of the Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto, as amended
from time to time, and all such contracts and supplemental agreements shall be submitted to the
Director of Public Works. Prior approval of supplemental agreements by the Director of Public
Works shall only be required for such change orders which in any way materially alter the
quality or character of the subject Facilities, or which involve an amount greater than $25,000.00.
The Authority expects that such contracts and supplemental agreements needing prior approval
by the Director of Public Works will be approved or denied (any such denial to be in writing,
stating the reasons for denial and the actions, if any, that can be taken to obtain later approval)
within ten (10) business days of receipt by the Director of Public Works thereof. Any approval
by the Director of Public Works of a supplemental agreement shall in no way affect the
Budgeted Costs listed in Exhibit B for any related Facility, but to the extent that it increases the
Actual Cost of a Facility, such increased cost may be payable as part of the Purchase Price of the
related Facility as provided in Section 5.06A. hereof.
Section 4.07. Time for Completion. The Developer agrees that this Acquisition
Agreement is for the benefit of the Authority and the Developer and, therefore, the Developer
represents that it expects to complete the Facilities and to have requested payment for the
Facilities under this Acquisition Agreement within thirty-six (36) months of the date of issuance
of any of the Bonds. Any failure to complete the Facilities within such time period shall not,
however, in itself, constitute a breach by the Developer of the terms of this Acquisition
Agreement.
ARTICLE V
ACQUISITION AND PAYMENT
Section 5.01. Inspection. No payment hereunder shall be made by the Authority to the
Developer for a Facility until the Facility has been inspected and found to be completed in
accordance with the approved Plans by the City or other applicable public entity or utility. The
Authority shall cause the City to make periodic site inspections of the Facilities to be acquired
hereunder; provided that in no event shall the Authority incur any liability for any delay in the
inspection of any Facilities. For Facilities to be acquired by other public entities or utilities, the
Developer shall be responsible for obtaining such inspections and providing written evidence
thereof to the Director of Public Works. The Developer agrees to pay all inspection, permit and
other similar fees of the City applicable to construction of the Facilities, subject to
reimbursement therefor as an Actual Cost of the related Facility.
Section 5.02. Agreement to Sell and Purchase Facilities. The Developer hereby agrees
to sell the Facilities listed in Exhibit B hereto to the City (or other applicable public agency that
will own a Facility), and the Authority hereby agrees to use amounts in the Improvement Fund
to pay the Purchase Prices thereof to the Developer, subject to the terms and conditions hereof.
The Authority shall not be obligated to finance the purchase of any Facility until the Facility is
completed and the Acceptance Date for such Facility has occurred. In any event, the Authority
shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price for any Facility except from the moneys in the
Improvement Fund.
Section 5.03. Payment Requests. In order to receive the Purchase Price for a completed
Facility, inspection thereof under Section 5.01 shall have been made and the Developer shall
deliver to the Director of Public Works: (i) a Payment Request in the form of Exhibit C hereto for
such Facility, together with all attachments and exhibits required by Exhibit C and this Section
5.03 to be included therewith (including, but not limited to Attachments 1 and 2 to Exhibit C),
and (ii) if payment is requested for a completed Facility, (a) if the property on which the Facility
ME
is located is not owned by the City (or other applicable public agency that will own the Facility)
at the time of the request, a copy of the recorded documents conveying to the City (or other
applicable public agency that will own the Facility) Acceptable Title to the real property on, in
or over which such Facility is located, as described in Section 6.01 hereof, (b) a copy of the
recorded notice of completion of such Facility (if applicable), (c) to the extent paid for with the
proceeds of the Bonds, an assignment to the CFD of any reimbursements that may be payable
with respect to the Facility, such as public or private utility reimbursements, and (d) an
assignment of the warranties and guaranties for such Facility, as described in Section 6.05
hereof, in a form acceptable to the Authority.
Section 5.04. Processing Payment Requests. Upon receipt of a Payment Request (and
all accompanying documentation), the Director of Public Works shall conduct a review in order
to confirm that such request is complete, that such Facility identified therein was constructed in
accordance with the Plans therefor, and to verify and approve the Actual Cost of such Facility
specified in such Payment Request. The Director of Public Works shall also conduct such
review as is required in his discretion to confirm the matters certified in the Payment Request.
The Developer agrees to cooperate with the Director of Public Works in conducting each such
review and to provide the Director of Public Works with such additional information and
documentation as is reasonably necessary for the Director of Public Works to conclude each
such review. For any Facilities to be acquired by another public entity or utility, the Developer
shall provide evidence acceptable to the Director of Public Works that such Facilities are
acceptable to such entity or utility. Within ten (10) business days of receipt of any Payment
Request, the Director of Public Works expects to review the request for completeness and notify
the Developer whether such Payment Request is complete, and, if not, what additional
documentation must be provided. If such Payment Request is complete, the Director of Public
Works expects to provide a written approval or denial (specifying the reason for any denial) of
the request within 30 days of its submittal. If a Payment Request seeking reimbursement for
more than one Facility is denied, the Director of Public Works shall state whether the Payment
Request is nevertheless approved and complete for any one or more Facilities and any such
Facilities shall be processed for payment under Section 5.05 notwithstanding such partial
denial. If multiple payment requests are submitted simultaneously, the Developer shall
designate the order in which they are to be reviewed.
Section 5.05. Payment. Upon approval of the Payment Request by the Director of
Public Works, the Director of Public Works shall sign the Payment Request and forward the
same to the City's Finance Director. Upon receipt of the reviewed and fully signed Payment
Request, the City's Finance Director shall, within the then current City financial accounting
payment cycle but in any event within thirty (30) days of receipt of the approved Payment
Request, cause the same to be paid by the Fiscal Agent to the extent of funds then on deposit in
the Improvement Fund. Any approved Payment Request not paid due to an insufficiency of
funds in the Improvement Fund, shall be paid promptly following the deposit into the
Improvement Fund of proceeds of any investment earnings or other amounts transferred to an
Improvement Fund under the terms of the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
The parties hereto acknowledge that (i) the Developer may be constructing Facilities
prior to the issuance of Bonds for the CFD, (ii) the Developer may be submitting Payment
Requests to the City in advance of such an issuance of Bonds for the CFD, with knowledge that,
other than as described in Section 3.04, there will not be funds available in the Improvement
Fund for reimbursement until the Bonds for the CFD are issued, (iii) the Facilities that are the
subject of the Payment Requests submitted when there are no funds or insufficient funds in the
Improvement Fund will be inspected and reviewed by the Director of Public Works as set forth
in this Article V and that such Payment Requests will be reviewed by the Director of Public
Works and, if appropriate, submitted in the manner set forth in Sections 5.03, 5.04 and 5.05, and
-10-
(iv) the payment for any Payment Requests approved in the preceding manner will be deferred
until the date, if any, on which there are sufficient amounts in the Improvement Fund to make
such payment, at which time the Director of Public Works will forward the approved Payment
Requests to the City's Finance Director, who will then arrange for payment from the
Improvement Fund in the manner set forth above.
The Purchase Price paid hereunder for any Facility shall constitute payment in full for
such Facility, including, without limitation, payment for all labor, materials, equipment, tools
and services used or incorporated in the work, supervision, administration, overhead, expenses
and any and all other things required, furnished or incurred for completion of such Facility, as
specified in the Plans.
Section 5.06. Restrictions on Payments. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Acquisition Agreement, the following restrictions shall apply to any payments made to the
Developer under Sections 5.02 and 5.05 hereof:
A. Amounts of Payments. Subject to the following paragraphs of this Section
5.06, payments for each Facility will be made only in the amount of the Purchase Price
for the respective Facility; however, if the Actual Cost exceeds the Budgeted Cost for a
Facility, the excess shall be borne by the Developer until such time as a Budgeted Cost
for another Facility is greater than the Actual Cost therefore, in which event the savings
shall be applied to reduce any excess of Actual Cost over Budgeted Cost previously paid
for any Facility by the Developer. Any savings attributable to the Actual Cost being less
than Budgeted Cost which are not disbursed under the previous sentence to cover
unreimbursed Actual Costs or as otherwise consented to by the Developer shall be
carried forward to be credited against future cost overruns, or costs related to
supplemental agreements (change orders), or if not needed for either of the foregoing
purposes, to be disposed of as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement for excess
monies in the Improvement Fund.
Nothing herein shall require the Authority in any event (i) to pay more than the
Actual Cost of a Facility, (ii) to make any payment beyond the available funds in the
Improvement Fund, or (iii) to pay for any roadway improvements that are not generally
accessible to the public (i.e. behind gates that impede the free flow of traffic). The
parties hereto acknowledge and agree that all payments to the Developer for the
Purchase Prices of Facilities are intended to be reimbursements to the Developer for
monies already expended or for immediate payment by the Developer (or directly by
the Authority) to third parties in respect of such Facilities.
No payment shall be made for the Purchase Price of any Facility if (i) the
Developer fails to fully provide any information requested pursuant to the second
sentence of Section 8.01G. related thereto, or (ii) if the Authority or the City determines
that the provisions of Section 8.01G. hereof were violated in connection with the work
related to such Facility and such violation has not been remedied to the satisfaction of
the City Attorney.
B. Toint or Third Party Payments. The Authority may make any payment jointly
to the Developer and any mortgagee or trust deed beneficiary, contractor or supplier of
materials, as their interests may appear, or solely to any such third party, if the
Developer so requests the same in writing (including, but not limited to, any financial
institution providing financing to the Developer or any Affiliate thereof) or as the
Authority otherwise determines such joint or third party payment is necessary to obtain
lien releases.
-11-
Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event that the City, the CFD and / or the
Authority has been in any way threatened with legal action or named in any legal action
by any contractor, subcontractor, supplier or other entity that has, or allegedly has,
provided any labor or materials for any Facility for which the Developer has submitted a
payment request, unless and until the Developer provides an unqualified lien release
from each such entity in a form acceptable to the City Attorney, the Authority, at its sole
and exclusive option, may either: (i) require the filing of an interpleader or similar action
in Superior Court with respect to payments for such Facility and make payment to an
escrow subject to approval of disbursement by the Court; or (ii) make payments directly
to the entity or entities that have filed liens or as otherwise demonstrated to the
reasonable satisfaction of the City Attorney that they are owed amounts in respect of the
respective Facility or District Components, up to the amount of such lien or amount
owed.
The provisions of this Section 5.06C. shall prevail over any assignment, or
purported assignment, by the Developer of its rights to payment under this Acquisition
Agreement.
C. Withholding Pam. The Authority shall be entitled, but shall not be
required, to withhold any payment hereunder for a Facility if the Developer or any
Affiliate is delinquent in the payment of ad valorem real property taxes, special
assessments or taxes, or special taxes in each case as levied on property located in the
CFD. In the event of any such delinquency, the Authority shall only make payments
hereunder, should any be made at the Authority's sole discretion, directly to contractors
or other third parties employed in connection with the construction of the Facilities or to
any assignee of the Developer's interests in this Acquisition Agreement (and not to the
Developer or any Affiliate), until such time as the Developer provides the Director of
Public Works with evidence that all such delinquent taxes and assessments have been
paid.
The Authority shall be entitled to withhold any payment hereunder for a Facility
that is the subject of a Payment Request until it is satisfied that any and all claims for
labor and materials have been paid by the Developer for the Facility that is the subject of
a Payment Request, or conditional lien releases have been provided by the Developer for
such Facility. The Authority, in its discretion, may waive this limitation upon the
provision by the Developer of sureties, undertakings, securities and / or bonds of the
Developer or appropriate contractors or subcontractors and deemed satisfactory by the
Director of Public Works to assure payment of such claims.
The Authority shall be entitled to withhold payment for any Facility hereunder
to be owned by the City until: (i) the Director of Public Works determines that the
Facility is ready for its intended use, (ii) the Acceptance Date for the Facility has
occurred and the requirements of Section 6.01, if applicable to such Facility, have been
satisfied, and (iii) a Notice of Completion executed by the Developer, in a form
acceptable to the Director of Public Works, has been recorded for the Facility and
general lien releases conditioned solely upon payment from the proceeds of the Bonds to
be used to acquire such Facility have been submitted to the Director of Public Works for
the Facility. The Authority hereby agrees that the Developer shall have the right to post
or cause the appropriate contractor or subcontractor to post a bond with the City to
indemnify it for any losses sustained by the City or the Authority because of any liens
that may exist at the time of acceptance of such a Facility, so long as such bond is drawn
on an obligor and is otherwise in a form acceptable to the Director of Public Works. The
-12-
Authority shall be entitled to withhold payment for any Facility to be owned by other
governmental entities, until the Developer provides the Director of Public Works with
evidence that the governmental entity has accepted dedication of and / or title to the
Facility. If the Director of Public Works determines that a Facility is not ready for
intended use under (i) above, the Director of Public Works shall so notify the Developer
as soon as reasonably practicable in writing specifying the reason(s) therefor.
Nothing in this Acquisition Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit the
Developer from contesting in good faith the validity or amount of any mechanics or
materialmans lien nor limit the remedies available to the Developer with respect thereto
so long as such delay in performance shall not subject the Facilities to foreclosure,
forfeiture or sale. In the event that any such lien is contested, the Developer shall only
be required to post or cause the delivery of a bond in an amount equal to twice the
amount in dispute with respect to any such contested lien, so long as such bond is
drawn on an obligor and is otherwise in a form acceptable to the Director of Public
Works.
D. Retention. The Authority shall withhold in the Improvement Fund an
amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the Purchase Price of each Facility to be paid
hereunder. Any such retention will be released to the Developer upon final completion
and acceptance of the related Facility and the expiration of a maintenance period
consistent with applicable City policy thereafter (currently a one year warranty period
for any landscaping, and upon receipt of a maintenance bond acceptable to the Director
of Public Works to remain in effect for one year as to other Facilities).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer shall be entitled to payment of
any such retention upon the completion and acceptance of a Facility, if a maintenance or
warranty bond is posted in lieu thereof in accordance with Section 6.06 hereof. Payment
of any retention shall also be contingent upon the availability of monies in the
Improvement Fund therefor. No retention shall apply if the Developer proves to the
Director of Public Work's satisfaction that the Developer's contracts for the Facilities
provide for the same retention as herein provided, so that the Purchase Price paid for the
Facility is at all times net of the required retention.
E. Frequency. Unless otherwise agreed to by the Director of Public Works, no
more than one Payment Request shall be submitted by the Developer in any calendar
month.
F. Right -of -Way. Payments for any right-of-way described in Exhibit B hereto
shall be based upon appraisals of the respective land to be acquired in a form acceptable
to the Director of Public Works, or upon such other basis as the Director of Public Works
shall, in his sole and absolute discretion, determine is appropriate in the circumstances.
Section 5.07. Acquisition of Additional Facilities. If the construction and acquisition
of all the Facilities theretofore listed in Exhibit B have been completed and the Purchase Prices
(including any retentions described in 5.06D. above) with respect thereto have been paid, and
funds remain on deposit in any of the Improvement Fund, the Authority shall notify the
Developer in writing of the amount of funds remaining in the Improvement Fund and shall
allow the Developer thirty (30) calendar days to submit a proposed amendment to Exhibit B to
this Acquisition Agreement to include Facilities not theretofore funded by the CFD. If such
amendment is approved by the Board of Directors of the Authority, the Authority shall retain
the excess funds in the Improvement Fund as necessary to pay the Purchase Prices of the
Facilities so added to Exhibit B, subject to the provisions of this Acquisition Agreement. If such
-13-
proposed amendment is not so approved, or if the remaining funds are in excess of what is
needed to pay the Actual Costs of such Facilities added to Exhibit B, such excess funds will be
disposed of as provided in the Fiscal Agent Agreement.
Section 5.08. Defective or Nonconforming Work. If any of the work done or materials
furnished for a Facility listed in Exhibit B are found by the Director of Public Works to be
defective or not in accordance with the applicable Plans: (i) and such finding is made prior to
payment for the Purchase Price of such Facility hereunder, the Authority may withhold
payment therefor until such defect or nonconformance is corrected to the satisfaction of the
Director of Public Works, or (ii) and such finding is made after payment of the Purchase Price of
such Facility, the Authority and the Developer shall act in accordance with the City's standard
specification for public works construction (which are set forth in the Green Book, Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC), by Public Works Standards, Inc., as
modified by applicable City Special Provisions.
Section 5.09. Right of City to Make Withdrawals From Improvement Fund. The
Developer acknowledges that the City may withdraw or cause to be withdrawn amounts from
the Improvement Fund for payment to the City as necessary to pay costs of the City, the
Authority or the CFD (i) in the event that the construction of the Facilities is substantially
delayed, (ii) in the event that the plans for or any other aspect of such construction are
substantially altered without the consent of the City, (iii) as provided in the last paragraph of
Section 8.02, or (iv) otherwise in the amount of any costs that the Director of Public Works
determines that the City has incurred or reasonably expects to incur in connection with the
performance of the obligations of the City (including the Director of Public Works) under this
Acquisition Agreement. The City shall give written notice of the amount of any such expected
withdrawal from the Improvement Fund for a purpose described in any of clauses (i), (ii), (iii)
or (iv) of the preceding sentence and the purpose(s) thereof to the Developer, prior to
implementing a withdrawal from the Improvement Fund for such a purpose. The Developer
acknowledges that any transfer described in the first sentence of this Section 5.09 will reduce the
amount available to pay the Purchase Prices of the Facilities hereunder.
ARTICLE VI
OWNERSHIP AND TRANSFER OF FACILITIES
Section 6.01. Facilities to be Owned by the City — Conveyance of Land and Easements
to City. Acceptable Title to all property on, in or over which each Facility to be acquired by the
City will be located, shall be deeded over to the City by way of grant deed, quitclaim, or
dedication of such property, or easement thereon, if such conveyance of interest is approved by
the City as being a sufficient interest therein to permit the City to properly own, operate and
maintain such Facility located therein, thereon or thereover, and to permit the Developer to
perform its obligations as set forth in this Acquisition Agreement. The Developer agrees to
assist the City in obtaining such documents as are required to obtain Acceptable Title.
Completion of the transfer of title to land shall be accomplished prior to the payment of the
Purchase Price for a Facility and shall be evidenced by recordation of the acceptance thereof by
the City Council or the designee thereof.
Section 6.02. Facilities to be Owned by the City — Title Evidence. Upon the request of
the City, the Developer shall furnish to the City, with respect to Facilities to be acquired by the
City and not previously dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the City: (i) a preliminary title
report for land for review and approval at least fifteen (15) calendar days prior to the transfer of
Acceptable Title to a Facility to the City, and (ii) a written certification to the effect that the
Developer is not aware of any promises or other arrangements with or for the benefit of the
-14-
owner or any previous owner of the respective land to be conveyed, and there are no known
impediments to the conveyance of such land to the City. The Director of Public Works shall
approve the preliminary title report unless it reveals a matter which, in the judgment of the
City, could materially affect the City's use and enjoyment of any part of the property or
easement covered by the preliminary title report. In the event the City does not approve the
preliminary title report, the City shall not be obligated to accept title to such Facility and the
Authority shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price for such Facility until the Developer
has cured such objections to title to the satisfaction of the City.
Section 6.03. Facilities Constructed on Private Lands. If any Facilities to be acquired
are located on privately -owned land, the owner thereof shall retain title to the land and the
completed Facilities until acquisition of the Facilities under Article V hereof. Pending the
completion of such transfer, the Developer shall not be entitled to receive any payment for any
such Facility.
Section 6.04. Facilities Constructed on City Land. If the Facilities to be acquired are on
land owned by the Authority, the Authority shall cause the City to grant to the Developer a
license to enter upon such land for purposes related to the construction (and maintenance
pending acquisition) of the Facilities. The provisions for inspection and acceptance of such
Facilities otherwise provided herein shall apply.
Section 6.05. Facilities to be Acquired by Other Public Agencies. With respect to any
Facility to be acquired by a public entity other than the City, the Developer shall comply with
such entities rules and regulations regarding title and conveyance of property, and provide the
Director of Public Works with evidence of such compliance, prior to the payment of the
Purchase Price for any such Facility.
Section 6.06. Maintenance and Warranties. The Developer shall maintain each Facility
in good and safe condition until the Acceptance Date of the Facility. Prior to the Acceptance
Date, the Developer shall be responsible for performing any required maintenance on any
completed Facility. On or before the Acceptance Date of the Facility, the Developer shall assign
to the Authority all of the Developer's rights in any warranties, guarantees, maintenance
obligations or other evidence of contingent obligations of third persons with respect to such
Facility. The Developer shall maintain or cause to be maintained each Facility to be owned by
the City (including the repair or replacement thereof) for a period of one year from the
Acceptance Date thereof, or, alternatively, shall provide a bond reasonably acceptable in form
and substance to the Director of Public Works for such period and for such purpose
(specifically, a one-year maintenance period for landscaping improvements, and for the posting
of a warranty bond to remain in effect for one year as to other Facilities), to insure that defects,
which appear within said period will be repaired, replaced, or corrected by the Developer, at its
own cost and expense, to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. During any such one-
year period, the Developer shall commence to repair, replace or correct any such defects within
thirty (30) days after written notice thereof by the Authority, the City or other public entity that
took ownership of the respective Facility to the Developer, and shall complete such repairs,
replacement or correction as soon as practicable. After such one-year period, the City (or other
public entity that has accepted title to the Facility) shall be responsible for maintaining such
Facility. Any warranties, guarantees or other evidences of contingent obligations of third
persons with respect to the Facilities to be acquired by the City shall be delivered to the Director
of Public Works as part of the transfer of title.
-15-
ARTICLE VII
INSURANCE; RESPONSIBILITY FOR DAMAGE
Section 7.01. Liability Insurance Requirements. The Developer shall provide to the
Director of Public Works evidence of insurance and endorsements thereto on forms acceptable
to the Risk Manager within 10 working days of execution by it of this Acquisition Agreement
and prior to any physical work on the Facilities being performed.
The Developer shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Acquisition
Agreement the following minimum insurance coverage and limits against claims for injuries to
persons or damage to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of
the work covered by this Acquisition Agreement by the Developer, its agents, representatives,
employees or subcontractors:
(a) Premises, operation and mobile equipment.
(b) Products and completed operations.
(c) Explosion, collapse and underground hazards.
(d) Personal injury.
(e) Contractual liability.
(f) Errors and omissions for work performed by design professionals.
COVERAGE PER OCCURRENCE
Commercial General
Liability (Primary)
Umbrella Liability
(Over Primary, if required)
Business Auto
Workers' Compensation
Employers' Liability
Errors and Omissions
ISO FORM
CG 00 011185 or 88 Rev.
$2,000,000
GL 00 011185 or 88 Rev.
$1,000,000
CA 00 0106 92 $1,000,000
Statutory
$1,000,000
$1,000,000
Combined single limit per occurrence shall include coverage for bodily injury, personal injury,
and property damage for each accident and a five million dollar ($5,000,000) general aggregate.
Insurance shall be placed with insurers that are admitted to the State of California and with an
AM Best's Rating of no less than A:VII.
The Developer shall furnish to the Risk Manager certificates of insurance and
endorsements on forms specified by the Risk Manager, duly authenticated, giving evidence of
the insurance coverage required in this contract and other evidence of coverage or copies of
policies as may be reasonably required by the Risk Manager from time to time. Each required
insurance policy coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in
coverage or in limits except after fifteen (15) days written notice by certified mail, return receipt
requested, has been given to the Risk Manager.
Liability coverage shall not be limited to the vicarious liability or supervising role of any
additional insured nor shall there be any limitation with the severability clause. Coverage shall
contain no limitation endorsements and there shall be no endorsement or modification limiting
the scope of coverage for liability arising from pollution, explosion, collapse, underground
property damage or employment related practices.
Any umbrella liability coverage shall apply to bodily injury / property damage, personal
injury / advertising injury, at a minimum, and shall include a "drop down' provision providing
-16-
primary coverage above a maximum $25,000.00 self -insured retention for liability not covered
by primary polices not covered by the umbrella policy. Coverage shall be following form to any
other underlying coverage. Coverage shall be on a "pay on behalf" basis, with defense costs
payable in addition to policy limits. There shall be no cross policy exclusion and no limitation
endorsement. The policy shall have starting and ending dates concurrent with the underlying
coverage.
All liability insurance shall be on an occurrence basis. Insurance on a claims made basis
will be rejected. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall be declared to and approved by
the Risk Manager. The insurer shall provide an endorsement to the City eliminating such
deductibles or self -insured retentions as respects the Authority, and its consultants, and each of
its Boardmembers, officials, employees and volunteers.
All subcontractors employed on the work referred to in this Acquisition Agreement
shall meet the insurance requirements set forth in this Section 7.01 for the Developer. The
Developer shall furnish certificates of insurance and endorsements for each subcontractor at
least five days prior to the subcontractor entering the job site, or the Developer shall furnish the
Risk Manager an endorsement including all subcontractors as insureds under its policies.
Neither the City nor the Authority shall be liable for any accident, loss, or damage to the
work prior to its completion and acceptance, and the Developer shall save, keep and hold
harmless the Authority, the City and their consultants, and each of their Boardmembers,
Councilmembers, officers, officials, employees, agents and volunteers from all damages, costs or
expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be claimed because of damages to
property, or personal injury received by reason of or in the course of performing work, which
may be caused by any willful or negligent act or omission by the Developer or any of the
Developer's employees, or any subcontractor.
The cost of insurance required by this subsection shall be born by the Developer and its
subcontractors and no compensation for purchasing insurance or additional coverage needed to
meet these requirements will be paid for by the Authority.
In the event that any required insurance is reduced in coverage, canceled for any reason,
voided or suspended, the Developer agrees that the Authority may arrange for insurance
coverage as specified, and the Developer further agrees that administrative and premium costs
may be deducted from any deposits or bonds the Authority may have, or from the
Improvement Fund. A reduction or cancellation will be grounds for termination of this
Acquisition Agreement and will cause a halt to payment for any work on the Facilities until the
insurance is reestablished.
Liability policies shall contain, or be endorsed to contain the following provisions:
(a) General Liability and Automobile Liability: The Authority, the City and their
respective consultants, and each of their Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers,
officials, employees and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds using ISO
form CG 00 01 11 85 or 88 as it respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or
on behalf of the Developer; products and completed operations of the Developer'
premises owned, occupied or used by the Developer; or automobiles owned, leased,
hired or borrowed by the Developer. The coverage shall contain no special limitations
on the scope or protection afforded to the Authority, the City and their respective
consultants, and each of their respective Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers,
officials, employees, or volunteers.
-17-
The Developer's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance with respect to
the Authority, the City and their respective consultants, and each of their respective
Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any
insurance or self-insurance maintained by the Authority, the City and their respective
consultants, and each of their respective Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers,
officials, employees and volunteers shall be excess of the Developer's insurance and
shall not contribute with it.
Any failure to comply with reporting provisions of the policies shall not affect
coverage provided to the Authority, the City, and their respective consultants, and each
of their respective Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers, officials, employees, and
volunteers.
The Developer's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom
claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's
liability.
(b) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability: The Developer and all
subcontractors shall have workers' compensation for all employees in conformance with
the requirements in Section 3700 of the Labor Code.
(c) Error and Omissions Liability: The Developer and all subcontractors who
are design professionals shall have and maintain errors and omissions insurance.
Section 7.02. Responsibility for Damage. The Developer shall take and assume all
responsibility for the work performed as part of the Facilities constructed pursuant to this
Acquisition Agreement. The Developer shall bear all losses and damages directly or indirectly
resulting to it, to the Authority, to the City, and their respective consultants, and their respective
Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers, employees and agents, or to others on account of the
performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents of any other causes
whatsoever.
The Developer shall assume the defense of and indemnify and save harmless the
Authority, the City, and their respective consultants, their respective Boardmembers,
Councilmembers, officers, employees, and agents, from and against any and all claims, losses,
damage, expenses and liability of every kind, nature, and description, directly or indirectly
arising from the performance of the work, and from any and all claims, losses, damage,
expenses, and liability, howsoever the same may be caused, resulting directly, or indirectly
from the nature of the work covered by this Acquisition Agreement, to the fullest extent
permitted by law and regardless (except as provided in the next sentence) of responsibility for
any negligence. In accordance with Civil Code section 2782, nothing in this Section 7.02 shall
require defense or indemnification for death, bodily injury, injury to property, or any other loss,
damage or expense arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Authority, the
City, and their respective consultants, and their respective Boardmembers, Councilmembers,
agents, servants or independent contractors who are directly responsible to the Authority or the
City, or for defects in design furnished by such persons. Moreover, nothing in this Section 7.02
shall apply to impose on the Developer, or to relieve the Authority or the City from, liability for
active negligence of the Authority, the City, or their respective consultants or their respective
Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers, employees or agents as delineated in Civil Code
Section 2782. Any relief for determining the Authority's or the City's sole or active negligence
shall be determined by a court of law.
go
The Authority does not, and shall not, waive any rights against the Developer which it
may have by reason of the aforesaid hold harmless agreements because of the acceptance by the
Authority or the City, or deposit with the Authority by the Developer of any insurance policies
described in Section 7.01. The aforesaid hold harmless agreement by the Developer shall apply
to all damages and claims for damages of every kind suffered, or alleged to have been suffered
by reasons of any of the aforesaid operations of the Developer, or any subcontractor, regardless
of whether or not such insurance policies are determined to be applicable to any of such
damages or claims for damages.
No act by the City, or its representatives in processing or accepting any plans, in
releasing any bond, in inspecting or accepting any work, or of any other nature, shall in any
respect relieve the Developer or anyone else from any legal responsibility, obligation or liability
it might otherwise have.
ARTICLE VIII
REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS
Section 8.01. Representations, Covenants and Warranties of the Developer. The
Developer represents and warrants for the benefit of the Authority as follows:
A. Organization. The Developer is a limited liability company duly organized
and validly existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, is in compliance with all
applicable laws of the State, and has the power and authority to own its properties and
assets and to carry on its business as now being conducted and as contemplated in this
Acquisition Agreement.
B. Authori1y. The Developer has the power and authority to enter into this
Acquisition Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Acquisition
Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Acquisition Agreement has been duly
and validly executed and delivered by the Developer.
C. Binding Obligation. This Acquisition Agreement is a legal, valid and binding
obligation of the Developer, enforceable against the Developer in accordance with its
terms, subject to bankruptcy and other equitable principles.
D. Compliance with Laws. The Developer shall not with knowledge commit,
suffer or permit any act to be done in, upon or to the lands of the Developer in the CID
or the Facilities in violation of any law, ordinance, rule, regulation or order of any
governmental authority or any covenant, condition or restriction now or hereafter
affecting the lands in the CFD or the Facilities.
E. Requests for Payment. The Developer represents and warrants that (i) it will
not request payment from the Authority for the acquisition of any improvements that
are not part of the Facilities, and (ii) it will diligently follow all procedures set forth in
this Acquisition Agreement with respect to the Payment Requests.
F. Financial Records. Until the date which is one year following the date of the
final acceptance of the Facilities, the Developer covenants to maintain proper books of
record and account for the construction of the Facilities and all costs related thereto.
Such accounting books shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted
-19-
accounting principles, and shall be available for inspection by the Authority or its agent
at any reasonable time during regular business hours on reasonable notice.
G. Prevailing Wages. The Developer covenants that, with respect to any
contracts or subcontracts for the construction of the Facilities listed in Exhibit B to be
acquired from the Developer hereunder, it will assure complete compliance with any
applicable law or regulation for the payment of prevailing wages. The Developer shall
provide, at the written request of the Director of Public Works, evidence satisfactory to
the Director of Public Works that the Developer has complied with the provisions of this
Section 8.01G. with respect to any Facilities to be funded under this Acquisition
Agreement.
H. Plans. The Developer represents that it has obtained or will obtain approval
of the Plans for the Facilities listed in Exhibit B to be acquired from the Developer
hereunder from all appropriate departments of the City and from any other public entity
or public utility from which such approval must be obtained. The Developer further
agrees that the Facilities listed in Exhibit B to be acquired from the Developer hereunder
have been or will be constructed in full compliance with such approved plans and
specifications and any supplemental agreements (change orders) thereto, as approved in
the same manner.
I. Land Owners. The Developer agrees that in the event that it sells any land
owned by it within the boundaries of the CFD other than to an individual prospective
homeowner, the Developer will (i) notify the Authority within 30 days of the sale, in
writing, identifying the legal name of and mailing address for the purchaser, the
applicable County Assessor's parcel number or numbers for the land sold and the
acreage of the land sold, (ii) notify the purchaser in writing prior to the closing of any
such sale of the existence of this Acquisition Agreement and, in general, the Developer's
rights and obligations hereunder with respect to the construction of and payment for the
Facilities, and (iii) notify the purchaser (including for purposes of this clause (iii) any
prospective homeowner buying property from the Developer) in writing of the existence
of the CFD and the special tax lien in connection therewith, and otherwise comply with
any applicable provision of Section 53341.5 of the Act.
J. Additional Information. The Developer agrees to cooperate with all
reasonable written requests for nonproprietary information by the original purchasers of
the Bonds or the Authority related to the status of construction of improvements
required by the Conditions of Approval, the anticipated completion dates for future
improvements, and any other matter material to the investment quality of the Bonds.
K. Continuing Disclosure. The Developer agrees to comply with all of its
obligations under any continuing disclosure agreement executed by it in connection
with the offering and sale of any of the Bonds for the CFD.
L. Ownership By Affiliates. The Developer agrees to provide to the City's
Finance Director on the date of issuance of the Bonds, on (or within five (5) business
days of) July 1 of each year so long as the Bonds are outstanding and the Developer or
any Affiliate thereof owns property in the CFD, and on any other date upon three
business days notice from the City's Finance Director, a written list of all Affiliates of the
Developer which own or control the ownership of land located within the CFD, or
which have options on land within the CFD, indicating the parcels of land by County
Assessor's Parcel number of all such land so owned or optioned.
-20-
M. Allocation of Sales Taxes to Authority. The Developer shall use reasonable
efforts, with respect to any construction contract for a contract price of $5,000,000 or
more and related to any construction by the Developer within the geographical
boundaries of the City, to have the installing contractor obtain a sub -permit from the
California Board of Equalization under the Bradley -Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use
Tax law for the job site on which the work is to be performed.
Section 8.02. Indemnification and Hold Harmless. The Developer shall assume the
defense of, indemnify and save harmless the Authority, the City and the CFD, the members of
the Authority, the members of the Board of Directors of the Authority and of the City Council of
the City, their respective officers, officials, employees and agents and each of them, from and
against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expense of every type and description to which
they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from (i) the breach of any provision of
this Acquisition Agreement by the Developer; (ii) the Developer's or any other entity's design,
engineering and / or construction of any of the Facilities acquired from the Developer
hereunder; (iii) the Developer's non-payment under contracts between the Developer and its
consultants, engineer's, advisors, contractors, subcontractors and suppliers in the provision of
the Facilities, including but not limited to any claim, lien or action by any such entity against the
City, the Authority or the CFD for money or damages; or (iv) any claims of persons employed
by the Developer or its agents to construct the Facilities. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no
indemnification is given hereunder for any action, damage, claim, loss or expense directly
attributable to the intentional acts or negligence of the Authority, the CFD or the City, or their
respective Boardmembers, Councilmembers, officers, officials, directors, employees or agents
hereunder.
No provision of this Acquisition Agreement shall in any way limit the Developer's
responsibility for payment of damages resulting from the operations of the Developer, its
agents, employees or its contractors.
The Developer shall assume the defense of (with counsel satisfactory to the Authority),
indemnify and save harmless the Authority, the City and the CFD, members of the governing
board of the Authority and of the City Council of the City, their officers, officials, employees
and agents and each of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expense of
every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting
from, any alleged or actual material misstatements or omissions of facts necessary to make the
statements with respect to the development by the Developer of the land in the CFD, or the
Developer, not misleading under the circumstances made in any disclosure materials published
in connection with the Bonds. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no indemnification is given
hereunder for any action, damage, claim, loss or expense directly attributable to the intentional
misstatements of material facts or material omissions in any such disclosure materials with
respect to the Authority or the City.
In the event that the Developer fails to discharge its obligations under any of the
foregoing provisions of this Section 8.02, the Authority shall be entitled, following prior written
notice of such failure to the Developer, to draw upon funds in the Improvement Fund as it
deems necessary for the defense, indemnity or hold harmless otherwise to be provided by the
Developer hereunder.
-21-
ARTICLE IX
TERMINATION
Section 9.01. Termination of Funding Obligations. Unless otherwise agreed to in
writing by the parties hereto, this Acquisition Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2030,
if the Bonds have not been issued by that date. If Bonds are issued before such date, this
Acquisition Agreement shall terminate on the date that no funds remain in the Improvement
Fund and the Authority has determined that no further Bonds will be issued for the CFD (other
than possible refunding bonds as described in Section 3.05). From and after the date of
termination of this Acquisition Agreement, the Authority shall have no further obligation to
pay the Purchase Price of any Facilities hereunder.
Section 9.02. Mutual Consent. This Acquisition Agreement may be terminated by the
mutual, written consent of the Authority and the Developer, in which event the Authority may
let contracts for any remaining work related to the Facilities not theretofore acquired from the
Developer hereunder, and use all or any portion of the monies in the Improvement Fund to pay
for same, and the Developer shall have no claim or right to any further payments for the
Purchase Price of Facilities hereunder, except as otherwise may be provided in such written
consent.
Section 9.03. Authority Election for Cause. The following events shall constitute
grounds for the Authority, at its option, to suspend payments to the Developer hereunder as
provided in the second succeeding paragraph, or terminate this Acquisition Agreement as
described in the succeeding paragraph, in each case without the consent of the Developer:
(a) The Developer shall voluntarily file for reorganization or other relief under
any Federal or State bankruptcy or insolvency law.
(b) The Developer shall have any involuntary bankruptcy or insolvency action
filed against it, or shall suffer a trustee in bankruptcy or insolvency or receiver to take
possession of the assets of the Developer, or shall suffer an attachment or levy of
execution made against the property it owns within the CFD unless, in any of such
cases, such circumstance shall have been terminated or released within thirty (30) days
thereafter.
(c) The Developer shall abandon construction of the Facilities. Failure for a
period of ninety (90) consecutive days to undertake substantial work related to the
construction of the Facilities, other than for a reason specified in Section 9.04 hereof,
shall constitute a noninclusive example of such abandonment.
(d) The Developer shall breach any material covenant or default in the
performance of any material obligation hereunder.
(e) The Developer shall transfer any of its rights or obligations under this
Acquisition Agreement without the prior written consent of the Authority.
(f) The Developer shall have made any material misrepresentation or omission in
any written materials furnished in connection with any preliminary official statement,
official statement or bond purchase contract used in connection with the sale of the
Bonds for the CFD.
-22-
(g) The Developer or any of its Affiliates shall at any time challenge the validity
of the CFD, or any of the Bonds, or the levy of special taxes within the CFD, other than
on the grounds that such levy was not made in accordance with the terms of the Rate
and Method of Apportionment of the Special Taxes for the CFD.
If any such event occurs, the Authority shall give written notice of its knowledge thereof
to the Developer, and the Developer agrees to meet and confer with the Director of Public
Works and other appropriate City staff and consultants within thirty (30) days of receipt of such
notice as to options available to assure timely completion of the Facilities listed in Exhibit B.
Such options may include, but not be limited to the termination of this Acquisition Agreement
by the Authority. If the Authority elects to terminate this Acquisition Agreement, the Authority
shall first notify the Developer (and any mortgagee or trust deed beneficiary specified in
writing by the Developer to the Authority to receive such notice) of the grounds for such
termination and allow the Developer a minimum of thirty (30) days to eliminate or mitigate to
the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works the grounds for such termination. Such period
may be extended, at the sole discretion of the Authority, if the Developer, to the satisfaction of
the Authority, is proceeding with diligence to eliminate or mitigate such grounds for
termination. If at the end of such period (and any extension thereof), as determined solely by
the Authority, the Developer has not eliminated or completely mitigated such grounds, to the
satisfaction of the Authority, the Authority may then terminate this Acquisition Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, if an event described in clause (a)
or (b) of the preceding paragraph occurs, the Authority need not comply with any of the
foregoing provisions of this paragraph and may, in its sole and absolute discretion, terminate
this Acquisition Agreement upon twenty (20) days prior written notice to the Developer of such
termination.
Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph, so long as any event listed in any of clauses
(a) through and including (g) above has occurred, notice of which has been given by the
Authority to the Developer, and such event has not been cured or otherwise eliminated by the
Developer, the Authority may in its discretion cease making payments for the Purchase Price of
Facilities under Article V hereof.
Nothing in this Section 9.03 shall in any way prohibit the Authority, the City or the CFD
from drawing funds from the Improvement Fund for any of the purposes described in Section
5.09.
Section 9.04. Force Majeure. Whenever performance is required of a party hereunder,
that party shall use all due diligence and take all necessary measures in good faith to perform,
but if completion of performance is delayed by reasons of floods, earthquakes or other acts of
God, war, pandemic, terrorist attacks, civil commotion, riots, strikes, picketing, or other labor
disputes, damage to work in progress by casualty, or by other cause beyond the reasonable
control of the party (financial inability excepted), then the specified time for performance shall
be extended by the amount of the delay actually so caused.
Section 9.05. Survival of Certain Provisions. The provisions of Sections 7.02, 8.02 and
10.01 of this Acquisition Agreement shall survive the termination of this Acquisition
Agreement, and the obligations of the Developer under said Sections shall remain in effect
following any such termination.
-23-
ARTICLE X
MISCELLANEOUS
Section 10.01. Limited Liability of Authority. The Developer agrees that any and all
obligations of the Authority arising out of or related to this Acquisition Agreement are special
and limited obligations of the Authority and the Authority's obligations to make any payments
hereunder are restricted entirely to the moneys, if any, in the Improvement Fund and from no
other source. No member of the Authority's Board of Directors, or Authority staff member,
employee or agent shall incur any liability hereunder to the Developer or any other party in
their individual capacities by reason of their actions hereunder or execution hereof.
Section 10.02. Excess Costs. The Developer will be responsible for any and all costs of
the Facilities that it is obligated to construct pursuant to the Conditions of Approval in excess of
the moneys available therefor in the Improvement Fund.
Section 10.03. Audit. The Director of Public Works and / or the City's Finance Director
shall have the right, during normal business hours and upon the giving of two (2) business days
prior written notice to the Developer, to review all books and records of the Developer
pertaining to costs and expenses incurred by the Developer in to any of the Facilities, and any
bids taken or received for the construction thereof or materials therefor.
Section 10.04. Attorney's Fees. In the event that any action or suit is instituted by either
party against the other arising out of this Acquisition Agreement, the party in whose favor final
judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to recover from the other party all costs and
expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees.
Section 10.05. Notices. Any notice, payment or instrument required or permitted by
this Acquisition Agreement to be given or delivered to either party shall be deemed to have
been received when personally delivered, or transmitted by telecopy or facsimile transmission
(which shall be immediately confirmed by telephone and shall be followed by mailing an
original of the same within twenty-four hours after such transmission), or seventy-two hours
following deposit of the same in any United States Post Office, registered or certified mail,
postage prepaid, addressed as follows:
Authority or CFD: Temecula Public Financing Authority
41000 Main Street
Temecula, California 92589-9033
Attention: Director of Public Works
Developer: Meritage Homes of California, Inc.
5 Peters Canyon Road, Suite 310
Irvine, CA 92606
Attention: Nick Emsiek,
Division President
Each party may change its address or addresses for delivery of notice by delivering
written notice of such change of address to the other party.
Section 10.06. Severability. If any part of this Acquisition Agreement is held to be
illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Acquisition
Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent possible.
-24-
Section 10.07. Successors and Assigns. This Acquisition Agreement shall be binding
upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This
Acquisition Agreement shall not be assigned by the Developer, except in whole to an Affiliate,
without the prior written consent of the Authority, which consent shall not be unreasonably
withheld or delayed. In connection with any such consent of the Authority, the Authority may
condition its consent upon the acceptability of the relevant experience and financial condition of
the proposed assignee, the assignee's express assumption of all obligations of the Developer
hereunder, and / or upon any other factor which the Authority deems relevant in the
circumstances. In any event, any such assignment shall be in writing, shall clearly identify the
scope of the rights and / or obligations assigned, and shall not be effective until approved in
writing by the Authority. No assignment, whether or not consented to by the Authority, shall
release the Developer from its obligations and liabilities under this Acquisition Agreement.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Developer may assign its rights to payment
hereunder, without the prior consent of the Authority, to any financial institution providing
financing to the Developer or an Affiliate of the Developer.
Section 10.08. Other Agreements. The obligations of the Developer hereunder shall be
those of a party hereto and not as an owner of property in the CFD. Nothing herein shall be
construed as affecting the Authority's or the Developer's rights, or duties to perform their
respective obligations, under other agreements, use regulations or subdivision requirements
relating to the development of the land in the CFD. This Acquisition Agreement shall not
confer any additional rights, or waive any rights given, by either party hereto under any
development or other agreement to which they are a party.
Section 10.09. Waiver. Failure by a party to insist upon the strict performance of any of
the provisions of this Acquisition Agreement by the other party, or the failure by a party to
exercise its rights upon the default of the other party, shall not constitute a waiver of such
party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other party with the terms of this
Acquisition Agreement thereafter.
Section 10.10. Merger. No other agreement, statement or promise made by any party
or any employee, officer or agent of any party with respect to any matters covered hereby that is
not in writing and signed by all the parties to this Acquisition Agreement shall be binding.
Section 10.11. Parties in Interest. Nothing in this Acquisition Agreement, expressed or
implied, is intended to or shall be construed to confer upon or to give to any person or entity
other than the Authority, the CFD, the City, and the Developer any rights, remedies or claims
under or by reason of this Acquisition Agreement or any covenants, conditions or stipulations
hereof; and all covenants, conditions, promises, and agreements in this Acquisition Agreement
contained by or on behalf of the Authority or the Developer shall be for the sole and exclusive
benefit of the Authority, the CFD, the City, and the Developer. The City is an intended third
party beneficiary of this Agreement.
No provision of this Acquisition Agreement shall in any way be construed to provide
any right whatsoever to any contractor, subcontractor, supplier or other party involved in the
acquisition, construction or maintenance of any of the Facilities against the Authority, the City
or the CFD, including but not limited to any right to payment or damages of any nature, in law
or in equity.
Section 10.12. Amendment. This Acquisition Agreement may be amended, from time
to time, by written Supplement hereto and executed by both the Authority and the Developer.
-25-
Section 10.13. Counterparts. This Acquisition Agreement may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
Section 10.14. Governing Law. The provisions of this Acquisition Agreement shall be
governed by the laws of the State applicable to contracts made and performed in the State.
-26-
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Acquisition Agreement
as of the day and year first -above written.
20009.18:J17265
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY, for and on behalf of the
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO.20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS)
By:
Aaron Adams,
Executive Director
MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.,
a California corporation
Nick Emsiek,
Division President
S-1
EXHIBIT A
DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR
ACQUISITION FROM THE DEVELOPER
The acquisition and construction of: streets (including paving, aggregate base, striping and
traffic marking, sidewalks, curbs, gutters and driveways), including Temecula Center Drive
and Ynez Road within and in the vicinity of the CFD; stormwater drainage systems
(including storm drain lines, inlets, outlets, channels, structures, junctions, manholes, catch
basins and related dewatering); street light improvements (including light fixtures,
substructures, conduits and service points of connection); and street signage (including
traffic, stop and street name signs).
• The acquisition and installation of traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Ynez
Road and Temecula Center Drive.
• Landscaping improvements in the public right of way along or in the vicinity of Temecula
Center Drive, Date Street and Ynez Road, including related appurtenances.
Exhibit A
Page 1
EXHIBIT B
FACILITIES ELIGIBLE FOR ACQUISITION FROM THE DEVELOPER AND
RELATED BUDGETED COSTS
Facility Budgeted
No. Description Cost
1 Temecula Center Drive from Ynez Road to Date Street: $1,935,729.20
Improvements include grading, removal of asphalt berms,
sawcut and removal of existing asphalt, paving, grind and
overlay of existing asphalt, curb and gutter, sidewalk,
landscaping, irrigation, signing and striping, street lights, traffic
control, storm drain and other appurtenant improvements
necessary to complete Temecula Center Drive.
2 Ynez Road from Temecula Center Drive to Date Street: $367,138.20
Improvements include sawcut and removal of existing
pavement and median curb, construction of new median and
turn lane, removal of median landscaping, paving, grind and
overlay of existing asphalt, curb and gutter, landscape,
irrigation, signing and striping, traffic control and other
appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Ynez Road.
Date Street from Ynez Road to Temecula Center Drive: $242,284.11
Improvements include sawcut and removal of existing
pavement median curb, construction of new median, removal
of median landscaping, paving, grind and overlay of existing
asphalt, curb and gutter, landscape, irrigation, signing and
striping, traffic control, and other appurtenant improvements
necessary to complete Ynez Road.
4 Traffic Signal at Temecula Center Drive and Ynez Road: $740,520.00
Improvements include traffic signal, traffic signal interconnect
on Ynez Rd. from Temecula Center Drive to Equity Drive, and
other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the
traffic signal at Temecula Center Drive and Ynez Road.
Exhibit B
Page 1
EXHIBIT C
FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST
PAYMENT REQUEST NO.
The undersigned ("the Developer'), hereby requests payment in the total amount of
$ for the Facilities (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement, dated as of
2021, between (a) the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority"), for
and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-
02 (Roripaugh Ranch) and the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities
District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms), and (b) the Developer), all as more fully described in
Attachment 1 hereto. In connection with this Payment Request, the undersigned hereby
represents and warrants to the Authority as follows:
1. He(she) is a duly authorized officer of the Developer, qualified to execute this
Payment Request for payment on behalf of the Developer and is knowledgeable as to the
matters set forth herein.
2. To the extent that this payment request is with respect to a completed Facility,
the Developer has submitted or submits herewith to the City of Temecula (the "City") as -built
drawings or similar plans and specifications for the items to be paid for as listed in Attachment
1 hereto with respect to any such completed Facility, and such drawings or plans and
specifications, as applicable, are true, correct and complete.
3. All costs of the Facilities for which payment is requested hereby are Actual Costs
(as defined in the Agreement referenced above) and have not been inflated in any respect. The
items for which payment is requested have not been the subject of any prior payment request
submitted to the Authority.
4. Supporting documentation (such as third party invoices) is attached with respect
to each cost for which payment is requested.
5. There has been compliance with applicable laws relating to prevailing wages for
the work to construct the Facilities for which payment is requested.
6. The Facilities for which payment is requested were constructed in accordance
with all applicable City or other governmental standards, and in accordance with the as -built
drawings or plans and specifications, as applicable, referenced in paragraph 2 above.
7. The Developer is in compliance with the terms and provisions of the Acquisition
Agreement and no portion of the amount being requested to be paid was previously paid.
8. The Purchase Price for each Facility (a detailed calculation of which is shown in
an Attachment 2 hereto for each such Facility), has been calculated in conformance with the
terms of Section 5.06 of the Acquisition Agreement.
9. Neither the Developer nor any Affiliate (as defined in the Acquisition
Agreement) is in default in the payment of ad valorem real property taxes or special taxes or
special assessments levied in the CFD (as defined in the Acquisition Agreement), except as
follows:
Exhibit C
Page 1
I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above representations and warranties
are true and correct.
DEVELOPER:
MERITAGE HOMES OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
Authorized Representative of the Developer
Date:
AUTHORITY:
Payment Request Approved for Submission
to the Finance Director of the City of Temecula
Director of Public Works
Date:
Exhibit C
Page 2
ATTACHMENT 1
EXHIBIT C
[list here all Facilities for which payment is requested,
and attach support documentation]
Exhibit C-1
Page 3
ATTACHMENT 2
EXHIBIT C
CALCULATION OF PURCHASE PRICE
[Use a separate sheet for each Facility
for which payment is being requested]
1. Description (by reference to Exhibit B to the Acquisition
Agreement) of the Facility
2. Actual Cost (list here total of supporting invoices and / or
other documentation supporting determination of Actual
Cost): $
3. Budgeted Cost: $
4. Permitted Addition to Budgeted Cost (to the extent, and only
to the extent, that Actual Cost exceeds Budgeted Cost),
consisting of Savings (Actual Costs less than Budgeted Cost)
carried forward from prior acquired Facilities (see first
paragraph of Section 5.06A) and not previously applied to
cover cost overruns (Actual Costs greater than Budgeted
Cost) on previously acquired Facilities: $
5. Subtractions from Purchase Price:
A. Holdback for Lien releases (see Section 5.06(C) of the
Acquisition Agreement) $
B. Retention (see Section 5.06(D) of the Acquisition
Agreement) $
6. Total disbursement requested (amount listed in 3, plus
amount, if any, listed in 4 (total of amounts in 3 and 4 not to
exceed amount listed in 2), less amounts, if any, listed in 5) $
Exhibit C-2
Page 1
SHEET 1 OF 1
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING
PROPOSED BOUNDARIES COOMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS), TEMECULA
PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD
ON THE DAY OF ,
2021. BY RESOLUTION NO.
SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING
AUTHORITY, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
THIS DAY OF 12021.
SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
V
5
VICINITY MAP
NOT TO SCALE
�O
�Q
15 AID)
SITE GPO
�Ci
�G
THIS BOUNDARY MAP CORRECTLY SHOWS THE LOT OR PARCEL
OF LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICT. FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND
DIMENSIONS OF LOTS OR PARCELS REFER TO THE COUNTY
ASSESSOR'S MAPS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021.
PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01
(HEIRLOOM FARMS)
TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SEC.26, T.7S., R.3W.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
N
0 500 1,000
I I I Feet
RECORDED THIS DAY OF , 20211
AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK .M., IN BOOK
PAGE OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY
FACILITIES DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
FEE: NO.:
PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR, COUNTY CLERK, RECORDER
DEPUTY
PARCEL IDENTIFICATION NUMBER
916-400-034
916-400-035
916-400-036
916-400-039
916-400-060
LEGEND
PROPOSED CFD BOUNDARY
PARCEL BOUNDARY
*IX 3:e33:e33:�9_1Yy: 101111] : 10111aLfy_%1[9]010 1111111•1:3: IV
M: IGIS AssessmentjTemecula
CFD 20-01.
Item No. 9
TO:
FROM:
DATE
CITY OF TEMECULA / TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AGENDA REPORT
City Council / Board of Directors
Aaron Adams, City Manager / Executive Director
February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year Budget Adjustments
PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council/TCSD Board of Directors adopt the following
resolutions entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGET
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL
OPERATING BUDGETS
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2021-25 AND AMENDING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
BACKGROUND: In accordance with Budget Policy II.B.- Interim Reporting, City
staff conducted a comprehensive Mid -Year review of its Annual Operating Budget and Capital
Improvement Program Budget. The purpose of the review is to analyze revenue and expenditure
trends to identify variances from the Adopted Budget and ensure that the City maintains a healthy
fiscal position. The Mid -Year Budget includes a review of all City funds. The requested
adjustments are summarized in the attached exhibits and discussed in further detail below.
GENERAL FUND:
General Fund Revenue includes a reduction of $1,468,642, bringing total FY20-21 Revenue
to $79,536,270. Adjustments by revenue category are noted below:
• Property Tax — increase of $449,473, to reflect the anticipated 4.5% increase in property
values within the City, as provided by the City's consultant team at HdL Coren & Cone.
• Sales Tax — increase of $917,000, to reflect more favorable sales tax activity than
originally projected. Despite the global pandemic, Sales Tax is expected to increase
2.5% over the prior year, as recent trends have shown that taxpayers who have retained
employment have experienced an increase in disposable income due to less expenditures
on travel, entertainment and job -related expenditures.
• Sales Tax Sharing Agreement — reduction of $352,761, to reflect an anticipated reduction
in the sales tax of a major corporation with whom the City has a tax sharing agreement.
• Franchise Fees — reduction of $69,252, to reflect less cable subscription revenue than
originally anticipated.
• Transient Occupancy Tax — reduction of $560,774, to reflect the prolonged closure of
hotels and motels due to the pandemic.
• Licenses, Permits and Service Charges — increase of $625,333, to reflect the increase in
development -related revenue.
• Fines and Forfeitures — reduction of $272,165, to reflect less Vehicle Code Fine activity
than originally projected.
• Use of Money and Property — reduction of $200,000, to reflect the change in fair value on
the City's investments.
• Intergovernmental Revenues — increase of $56,337, to align Property Tax In Lieu of
Vehicle License Fee revenue with the amount provided by the County for this revenue
source.
• Reimbursements — reduction of $23,165, which reflects the deferral of $115,165 in
Community Facility District fees for municipal services. These fees are assessed on new
homes built within the Sommer's Bend and Rancho Soleo housing developments, offset
by $92,000 increase in Public Works' reimbursements.
• Transfers In — reduction of $2,671,698, as a result of the reduced need for Measure S
funds which were reduced by $3,000,000, partially offset by higher Transfers In from
Gas Tax ($221,624) and the Supplemental Law Enforcement Grant ($106,678).
General Fund Expenditures include a reduction of $64,164, bringing total Expenditues and
Transfers Out to $84,313,207. Adjustments by expenditure category are noted below:
• Salaries and Benefits — reduction of $11,338, due primarily to savings achieved from
vacant positions.
• Operations and Maintenance — reduction of $569,903, due primarily to a $402,794
reduction in the Sheriff's Contract as a result of a more favorable contract rate than
originally projected. Additional reductions include less Economic Development
sponsorship activity ($38,415) and a temporary reduction in the intern/fellowship
program ($21,051) due to COVID. Reductions in Planning's consulting services
($25,000) and staff training ($15,500), combined with a reduction in Public Works'
consulting services ($50,000) all reflect lower levels of service as a result of the
pandemic.
• Capital Outlay — increase of $155,000 for a new license plate reader program for the
Police department, which is offset by savings in departmental Salaries and Benefits.
• Transfers Out — increase of $362,077 for the Sidewalks-DLR Drive capital project, which
was erroneously missed in the October Budget update.
General Fund Ending Fund Balance is protected to be $27,756,5131 with Reserves fully -
funded at $19,829,389. A total of $6,749,159 of fund balance is Unassigned and available to
fund future one-time projects and/or equipment.
General Fund 5-Year Projections
Fund Balance Trend
35,000,000
30,000,000
25,000,000
20,000,000
15,000,000
10,000,000
o12"13 FI1314, 091_15 o10-
6 vo-6.11 FYV_18 oV,-19 01924 o211_21 FY21.22 FY2223 Fy23-2& F,aAr25
+Fund Balance —Funded Reserve O Desired Reserve
In addition, the General Fund 5-Year Projections indicate that Reserves will remain fully -funded
throughout the long-term forecast, as revenues continue to outpace expenditure projections.
MEASURE S FUND:
Measure S Revenue includes a reduction of $377,029, bringing total FY20-21 Revenue to
$27,754,800, which aligns with the City's Sales Tax consultant estimate. Measure S revenue is
remitted on a delayed basis from the State of California and through February, the City has only
received information on sales activity from July — September 2020. Due to the unknown impact
of the statewide closures on our local economy, the City is utilizing the projections of the
consultant team, HdL Companies.
Measure S Expenditures includes a reduction of $3,400,000, bringing total FY20-21
Expenditures to $36,883,883. The transfer to the General Fund to support Public Safety was
reduced by $3,000,000 due to more favorable revenue than anticipated in the General Fund,
reducing the reliance on Measure S. The transfer to the TCSD Fund was also reduced, by
$400,000, due to the prolonged closure of TCSD facilities, programs and events.
Total Measure S Ending Fund Balance is estimated to be $6,316,608.
SPECIAL REVENUE & DEBT SERVICE FUNDS:
The City maintains 15 separate Special Revenue Funds and two Debt Service Funds. Activities
in these funds are legally required to be accounted for in separate and distinct funds. Below is a
summary of the Mid -Year requests for each Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds.
Beginning
Current
Revised
Current
Revised
Ending
Balance
Revenues/
Mid -Year
Revenues/
Expenditures/
Mid -Year
Expenditures/
Balance
2020-21
Transfers In
Adjustment
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Adjustment
Transfers Out
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
SPECIAL REVENUE RINDS
100: GAS TAX
101,877
2,418,092
221,624
2,639,716
2,418,092
221,624
2,639,716
101,877
102: ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT
1,324,432
1,840,342
203,995
2,044,337
2,806,076
-
2,806,076
562,693
(RMRA)
103: STREET MAINTENANCE
1,457,541
2,012,500
-
2,012,500
-
-
-
3,470,041
106: JEFFERSON STREET IN -LIEU FEES
892,717
222,718
-
222,718
-
-
1,115,435
107: CARES ACT
-
1,382,508
-
1,382,508
1,382,508
-
1,382,508
-
120: DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES
4,388,270
4,755,870
-
4,755,870
9,144,140
-
9,144,140
-
125:PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT (PEG)
427,810
222,219
-
222,219
100,000
-
100,000
550,029
140: COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT
(63,909)
1,487,736
1,018,650
2,506,386
1,176,527
1,265,950
2,442,477
-
145:TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM
198,410
1,300
640,754
642,054
-
200,000
200,000
640,464
150: AB 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE SUBVENTION
15,214
153,370
-
153,370
116,900
-
116,900
51,684
160: SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES
-
172,507
106,678
279,185
172,507
106,678
279,185
-
161:TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD
27,124
180
-
180
-
-
-
27,304
165: AFFORDABLE HOUSING
11,957,411
340,100
-
340,100
597,131
(22,367)
574,764
11,722,747
170: MEASURE A
7,741,676
2,818,800
-
2,818,800
9,868,388
-
9,868,388
692,088
198: PUBLIC ART
56,632
13,255
-
13,255
-
-
-
69,887
TOTAL SPECIAL REVENUE FUNDS
28,525,205
17,841,497
2,191,701
20,033,198
27,782,269
1,771,885
29,554,154
19,004,249
INTERNAL SERVICES FUNDS:
The City has nine Internal Service Funds, used to account for services provided internally
between departments. Below is a summary of the Mid -Year requests for each Internal Service
Fund.
Beginning
Current
Revised
Current
Revised
Ending
Balance
Revenues/
Mid -Year
Revenues/
Expenditures/
Mid -Year
Expenditures/
Balance
2020-21
Transfers In
Adjustment
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Adjustment
Transfers Out
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
INTERNAL SERVICE RINDS
300: INSURANCE
748,090
1,097,820
-
1,097,820
1,143,369
-
1,143,369
702,541
305: WORKERS' COMPENSATION
2,376,525
13,000
-
13,000
278,779
-
278,779
2,110,746
310: VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT
3,800,749
891,376
-
891,376
136,616
(125,000)
11,616
4,680,509
320: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
1,110,473
4,578,204
-
4,578,204
5,087,712
-
5,087,712
600,965
325: TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT
1,660,004
712,224
-
712,224
1,142,536
-
1,142,536
1,229,692
330: SUPPORT SERVICES
2,704
379,376
-
379,376
376,769
-
376,769
5,311
335: SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT
421,259
28,524
-
28,524
60,000
-
60,000
389,783
340: FACILITIES
585,694
1,394,190
40,000
1,434,190
1,361,455
402,056
1,763,5111
256,373
350: FACILITY REPLACEMENT
621,233
501,700
48,583
550,283
450,000
(85,000)
365,000
806,516
TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE RINDS
11,326,731
9,596,414
88,583
9,684,997
10,037,236
192,056
10,229,292
10,782,436
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
The Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) provides for a comprehensive
neighborhood and community park system, as well as a complement of recreational and cultural
programs, community and human services and special events. TCSD also provides street
lighting, median and slope maintenance, refuse hauling and recycling, emergency dirt road
maintenance, and library services.
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year adjustments reflect the prolonged closures of TCSD facilities,
programs and events due to the pandemic, and are summarized in the table below.
Beginning
Current
Revised
Current
Revised
Ending
Balance
Revenues/
Mid -Year
Revenues/
Expenditures/
Mid -Year
Expenditures/
Balance
2020-21
Transfers In
Adjustment
Transfers In
Transfers Out
Adjustment
Transfers Out
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
2020-21
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
190: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
845,744
11,558,813
(871,121)
10,687,692
11,881,390
(571,250)
11,310,140
223,296
192: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS
257,367
713,935
-
713,935
575,723
-
575,723
395,579
194: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING
147,821
8,676,945
-
8,676,945
8,685,983
-
8,685,983
138,783
195: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT
20,778
5,652
7,050
12,702
15,150
-
15,150
18,330
196: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT.
418,989
253,232
-
253,232
271,673
-
271,673
400,548
197: TEMECULA LIBRARY
382,653
875,031
(23,067)
851,964
1,090,394
(85,843)
1,004,551
230,066
501-530: TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" ZONES 1-30
1,847,877
1,595,669
-
1,595,669
1,956,415
-
1,956,415
1,487,131
TOTAL TCSD
3,921,229
23,679,278
(887,138)
22,792,140
24,476,728
(657,093)
23,819,635
2,893,734
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Adjustments to the Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program include the following:
• Comprehensive General Plan Update Project - increase grant funding by $10,000 to
match the Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) grant award amount of $310,000.
• Sports Field Lighting - Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Project - increase
funding by $200,000 from the Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset (TEAM) Fund.
• Sidewalks -Old Town Improvements Project - transfer $280,000 in Measure S funding
from the Sidewalks -Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement project.
• I-15 Congestion Relief Project - increase appropriation by $100,000 to reflect the
contribution received from the City of Murrieta.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal impact of each fund is noted in the attached Exhibits.
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution - Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit A - General & Measure S Fund
b. Exhibit B - Special Revenue & Debt Service Funds
c. Exhibit C - Internal Service Funds
2. CSD Resolution - Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit A - TCSD Funds
3. Resolution - Capital Improvement Program
Mid -Year Budget Amendments
a. Exhibit 1 - CIP Mid -Year Adjustments
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGET
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the City maintains a prudent and healthy fiscal position.
Section 2. That each year a mid -year review is conducted of City operating budgets.
Section 3. That the mid -year review has been completed and the recommended
adjustments are reflected in the attached schedules for the City's General Fund, Special Revenue,
Debt Service and Internal Services Funds.
Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2020-21 General Fund and Measure S Fund Annual
Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit A, General Fund
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year Budget.
Section 5. That the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds
Annual Operating Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit B —
Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year Budget.
Section 6. That the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Internal Services Funds Annual Operating
Budgets are hereby amended in accordance with the attached Exhibit C, Internal Services Funds
Fiscal Year 2020-21 Mid -Year Budget.
Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify adoption of the resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
EXHIBIT A
General
Fund
&
Measure
S
Fund
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Property Tax
8,831,452
8,777,137
5,287,251
9,226,610
449,473
5.1 %
Sales Tax
35,263,640
35,260,000
16,S41,339
36,177,000
917,000
2.6 %
Sales Tax Sharing Agreement
(1,354,111)
(1,597,814)
(303,785)
(1,245,053)
352,761
-22.1 %
Franchise Fees
3,039,761
3,631,908
1,542,623
3,562,656
(69,252)
-1.9 %
Transient Occupancy Tax
2,662,876
3,181,349
1,185,331
2,620,575
(560,774)
-17.6 %
Special Tax (Measure C)
1,840,763
1,880,264
43,941
1,880,264
0
0.0 %
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
22,811
18,000
0
18,000
0
0.0 %
Business Licenses
2S4,667
2S5,000
95,780
255,000
0
0.0 %
Land Development
1,847,119
578,504
845,123
1,006,805
428,301
74.0 %
Public Works
1,175
800
4,750
4,750
3,950
493.8 %
Parks Maintenance
25,668
1,000
0
1,000
0
0.0 %
Building
1,959,017
1,660,009
955,233
1,671,009
11,000
0.7 %
Planning
474,845
532,140
243,526
542,722
10,582
2.0 %
Police
150,512
140,557
56,191
149,557
9,000
6.4 %
Fire
794,973
707,269
425,156
786,769
79,500
11.2 %
Development Fees
177,444
159,780
77,510
159,780
0
0.0 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
601,163
691,939
220,300
419,774
(272,165)
-39.3 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
815,902
82,300
(140,893)
(117,700)
(200,000)
-243.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
185,823
148,089
65,221
148,089
0
0.0 %
Other
95,559
0
4,941
4,941
4,941
100.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
Property Tax In Lieu Of VLF
8,434,916
8,745,321
0
8,801,658
56,337
0.6 %
Vehicle License Fees
90,088
55,415
0
55,415
0
0.0 %
Grants
2,249,767
0
3,500
0
0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Capital Improvement Program
169,474
2,435,827
989,959
2,435,827
0
0.0 %
Pechanga IGA
0
356,567
0
356,567
0
0.0 %
Other Reimbursements
233,439
356,614
203,640
333,449
(23,165)
-6.5 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
2,840,294
3,973,107
1,732,209
4,301,409
328,302
8.3 %
Contribution From Measure S
5,592,418
8,944,780
2,236,195
5,944,780
(3,000,000)
-33.5 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
35,251
29,050
20,612
34,617
5,567
19.2 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
77,336,705
81,004,912
32,335,654
79,536,270
(1,468,642)
-1.8 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
16,221,068
16,153,016
7,614,670
16,141,678
(11,338)
-0.1 %
Operations & Maintenance
51,348,094
57,645,829
21,456,538
57,075,926
(569,903)
-1.0 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
5,180,162
5,611,512
2,796,628
5,611,512
0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay
104,791
333,438
74,303
488,438
155,000
46.5 %
Transfers
5,663,044
4,633,575
3,415,871
4,995,652
362,077
7.8 %
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 001 - GENERAL FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 78,517,158 84,377,371 35,358,009 84,313,207 (64,164)
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (1,180,453) (3,372,459) (3,022,355) (4,776,937) (1,404,478)
-0.1
41.6
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 33,713,903 32,533,450 32,533,450
Fund Balance, End of Year 32,533,450 29,160,991 27,756,513
Fund Description
The General Fund is the main operating fund for the City of Temecula. It is used to account for all financial resources for the City
that are not restricted to a special purpose and otherwise required to be accounted for in another fund. The General fund provides
the resources necessary to sustain the day-to-day activities and pays for all administrative and operating expenditures.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 002 - MEASURE S FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Transactions And Use Tax 28,158,664 28,091,029 13,131,207
27,734,000
(357,029)
-1.3 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 164,280 40,800 (13,295)
20,800
(20,000)
-49.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 28,322,944 28,131,829 13,117,913
27,754,800
(377,029)
-1.3 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers 19,641,318 40,283,883 9,860,384
36,883,883
(3,400,000)
-8.4 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 19,641,318 40,283,883 9,860,384
36,883,883
(3,400,000)
-8.4 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 8,681,626 (12,152,054) 3,257,529
(9,129,083)
3,022,971
-24.9 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 6,764,065 15,445,691
15,445,691
Fund Balance, End of Year 15,445,691 3,293,637
6,316,608
Fund Description
Measure S, approved by the voters on November 8, 2016, established a one -cent Transactions
and Use Tax for the City.
The
measure was approved based on the commitment to maintain 9-1-1 emergency response
times, prevent cuts to local
paramedic/police/fire protection, school safety patrols, youth/after-school, senior and disabled services; improve freeway
interchanges/reduce traffic and provide for other general services.
EXHIBIT B
Special Revenue Funds and
Debt Service Funds
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 100 -GAS TAX FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Gas Tax
2,631,080
2,418,092
1,311,033 2,639,716 221,624 9.2
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
9,524
0
510 0 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,640,603
2,418,092
1,311,543 2,639,716 221,624 9.2 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
2,538,726
2,418,092
1,413,420 2,639,716 221,624 9.2
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,538,726
2,418,092
1,413,420 2,639,716 221,624 9.2 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
101,877
0
(101,877) 0 0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
0
101,877
101,877
Fund Balance, End of Year
101,877
101,877
101,877
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the tax per gallon on the
purchase of motor vehicle fuel imposed by the State of California.
A portion is allocated to the City of Temecula as specified in the California Streets and Highways Code (SHC) (Sections 2013, 2105,
2107 and 2107.5). Gas Tax monies are restricted
to the repair, maintenance and
upkeep of City streets and roads, and the purchase
of equipment used to maintain roads.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 102 - ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACCOUNT (RMRA) FUND
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Gas Tax
1,988,186
1,827,342
1,046,267
2,031,337
203,995
11.2
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
25,533
13,000
(1,663)
13,000
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,013,719
1,840,342
1,044,603
2,044,337
203,995
11.1
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
2,000,000
2,806,076
0
2,806,076
0
0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,000,000
2,806,076
0
2,806,076
0
0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
13,719
(965,734)
1,044,603
(761,739)
203,995
-21.1
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,310,713
1,324,432
1,324,432
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,324,432
358,698
562,693
Fund Description
This fund is to account for gasoline and vehicle registration taxes pursuant to the Road Repair and Accountability Act of 2017 (S61
Beall). Monies are collected by the State of California and allocated to local agencies for streets and roads projects and other
transportation uses.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 103 - STREET MAINTENANCE FUND
Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
44,557
12,500
(503)
12,500
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
0
2,000,000
0
2,000,000
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
44,557
2,012,500
(503)
2,012,500
0
0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
44,557
2,012,500
(503)
2,012,500
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,412,984
1,457,541
1,457,541
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,457,541
3,470,041
3,470,041
Fund Description
This fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of streets and roads throughout the City.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 106 - JEFFERSON STREET IN -LIEU FEES
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees 393,933 222,718 0 222,718 0
0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 5,448 0 (352) 0 0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In 493,336 0 0 0 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 892,717 222,718 (352) 222,718 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 892,717 222,718 (352) 222,718 0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 892,717 892,717
Fund Balance, End of Year 892,717 1,115,435 1,115,435
Fund Description
This fund was established in conjunction with the adoption of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee.
The
Specific Plan requires developers to dedicate right-of-way and construct new street improvements adjacent to or through
their
development sites. Developers within the Specific Plan who cannot contribute right-of-way and/or build new streets will
be charge(
a new streets in -lieu fee.
IL
f
Adk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 107 - CARES ACT
Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Reimbursements
Capital Improvement Program
0
1,382,508
1,382,508
1,382,508
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
0
1,382,508
1,382,508
1,382,508
0
0.0
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
0
1,382,508
0
1,382,508
0
0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
0
1,382,508
0
1,382,508
0
0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
0
0
1,382,508
0
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
0
0
Fund Balance, End of Year
0
0
0
Fund Description
CARES Act grant revenue
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 120 - DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
2,559,163
4,213,358
670,308
4,213,358
0
0.0 %
Quimby Fees
518,199
524,512
22,088
524,512
0
0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
70,819
18,000
(1,822)
18,000
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
5,971
0
0
0
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
3,154,152
4,755,870
690,573
4,755,870
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
4,782,851
9,144,140
794,300
9,144,140
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
4,782,851
9,144,140
794,300
9,144,140
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(1,628,699)
(4,388,270)
(103,727)
(4,388,270)
0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
4,221,054
2,592,355
2,592,355
Fund Balance, Adjustment
0
1,795,915
1,795,915
Fund Balance, End of Year
2,592,355
0
0
Fund Description
This fund accounts for the development impact
fees received as a result of development activity
within the City. The fees are
primarily used to fund Capital Improvement Projects designed
to mitigate the impacts of development
projects.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 125 - PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT (PEG) FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Peg Fees
233,144
220,219
34,547
220,219
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
7,420
2,000
(224)
2,000
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
240,564
222,219
34,324
222,219
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Capital Outlay
179,749
100,000
10,245
100,000
0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
179,749
100,000
10,245
100,000
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
60,815
122,219
24,079
122,219
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
366,995
427,810
427,810
Fund Balance, End of Year
427,810
550,029
550,029
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for Public Education and Government (PEG) fees. Fees received from local cable operators for
the sole purpose of supporting the access facilities and activities within the City.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 140 - COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget 12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Intergovernmental Revenues
Grants
0
0 0
329,000
329,000
100.0 %
Community Development Block Grant
S28,033
1,487,736 63,909
1,487,736
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
0
0 412,056
689,650
689,650
100.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
528,033
1,487,736 475,965
2,506,386
1,018,650
68.5 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
111,688
111,441 93,435
157,627
46,186
41.4 %
Operations & Maintenance
127,280
477,489 407,410
1,297,253
819,764
171.7 %
Transfers
3S2,974
S87,597 0
987,597
400,000
68.1 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
591,942
1,176,527 S00,845
2,442,477
1,265,950
107.6 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(63,909)
311,210 (24,880)
63,910
(247,300)
-79.5 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
0
(63,909)
(63,909)
Fund Balance, End of Year
(63,909)
247,300
0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for grants received
from the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD). The
grants are used for the redevelopment of a viable
community by providing decent housing,
a suitable living
environment, and for
expanding opportunities, principally for persons
of low and moderate income.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 145 - TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET (TEAM) FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals Budget 12-31-2020
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,160 1,300 (70)
1,300 0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
0 0 0
640,754 640,754
100.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
4,160 1,300 (70)
642,054 640,754
49,288.8 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
0 0 0
200,000 200,000
100.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
0 0 0
200,000 200,000
100.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
4,160 1,300 (70)
442,054 440,754
33,904.2 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
194,250 198,410
198,410
Fund Balance, End of Year
198,410 199,710
640,464
Fund Description
This fund was established to capture energy efficiency rebates and reimbursements as well
as expenditure savings resulting
from
energy efficiency projects completed at various City facilities. Revenue collected in this fund will be utilized on future energy
efficiency projects.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 150 - AB 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE SUBVENTION FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20
Current Actuals
Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals
Budget 12-31-2020
Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 4,778
1,500 (160)
1,500 0 0.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
AB2766 Motor Vehicle Subvention 142,094
151,870 37,417
151,870 0 0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources 146,872
153,370 37,257
153,370 0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 10,000
10,200 0
10,200 0 0.0
Transfers 347,198
106,700 0
106,700 0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 357,198
116,900 0
116,900 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (210,326)
36,470 37,257
36,470 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 225,540
15,214
15,214
Fund Balance, End of Year 15,214
51,684
51,684
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for subvention funds that are used to implement programs
and projects that reduce air
pollution from motor vehicles. AB2766 Funds are derived from
a Motor Vehicle Registration fee surcharge. Local governments are
allocated $1.60 for every eligible vehicle registered within the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Funds are disbursed
based on the City's population as a percentage of the total population within the District. This fund is used for Capital projects and
the City's share of WRCOG's Clean Cities Coalition.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 160 - SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 663 490 91 490 0
0.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
SLESF Grant 171,239 172,017 228,698 278,695 106,678
62.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources 171,902 172,507 228,789 279,185 106,678
61.8 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers 171,902 172,507 228,789 279,185 106,678
61.8
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 171,902 172,507 228,789 279,185 106,678
61.8 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 0 0
Fund Balance, End of Year 0 0 0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the Supplemental Law Enforcement Services grant monies from the State of California
which are provided to assist cities in delivering front line law enforcement services. These monies supplement existing
services and
may not be used to supplant any existing funding for law enforcement services provided by the City.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 161 - TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 569 180 (10) 180 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 569 180 (10) 180 0 0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 569 180 (10) 180 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 26,555 27,124 27,124
Fund Balance, End of Year 27,124 27,304 27,304
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for a reward for information that leads to the capture and conviction of the person(s)
responsible for the murder of Larry Robinson and Justin Triplett. The General Fund contributed $25,000 and the public can also
contribute to this fund. The fund was established in accordance with Resolution Nos. 13-25 and 15-37. In April of 2018, Council
adopted Resolution No. 18-24 for the continuation of the reward for an additional three years (to March 22, 2021) to assist the
Sheriff in the investigation since no person has been arrested for the Larry Robinson murder.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 165 - AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Police
925
0
1,000
0
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
23,931
4,700
(621)
4,700
0
0.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
1,136,349
85,400
208,000
85,400
0
0.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
Agency Trust Contribution
250,000
250,000
0
250,000
0
0.0
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
75,000
0
0
0
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,486,204
340,100
208,379
340,100
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
294,008
301,732
123,758
279,365
(22,367)
-7.4 %
Operations & Maintenance
97,284
258,462
19,126
258,462
0
0.0 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
35,853
36,937
20,605
36,937
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
427,144
597,131
163,488
574,764
(22,367)
-3.7 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,059,060
(257,031)
44,891
(234,664)
22,367
-8.7 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
10,898,351
11,957,411
11,957,411
Fund Balance, End of Year
11,957,411
11,700,380
11,722,747
Fund Description
The Affordable Housing fund contains the assets as well as loan and rental income which have been transferred to the City of
Temecula from the former Redevelopment Agency.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 170 - MEASURE A FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget 12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
121,678
35,800 (3,676)
35,800
0
0.0 %
Intergovernmental Revenues
Measure A
3,374,987
2,783,000 1,474,871
2,783,000
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
3,496,665
2,818,800 1,471,195
2,818,800
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
773,103
3,520,878 2,464,996
3,520,878
0
0.0
Transfers
0
6,347,510 143,600
6,347,510
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
773,103
9,868,388 2,608,596
9,868,388
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,723,561
(7,049,588) (1,137,400)
(7,049,588)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
5,018,115
7,741,676
7,741,676
Fund Balance, End of Year
7,741,676
692,088
692,088
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the City's
allocation of
the County of Riverside's additional
one-half
percent sales
tax for
transportation. These monies are restricted for use on local streets.
In 2002, Measure A was
extended by Riverside County voters.
Measure A will continue to fund transportation improvements
through 2039.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 198 - PUBLIC ART FUND
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Public Art 34,097 13,055 14,733 13,055 0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 833 200 (37) 200 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 34,930 13,2S5 14,696 13,255 0 0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 34,930 13,255 14,696 13,255 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 21,702 56,632 56,632
Fund Balance, End of Year 56,632 69,887 69,887
Fund Description
This fund was established pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section 5.08.040, whereby the fund serves a a depository for the
fees paid in lieu of art as well as monetary donations for public art. The Public Art In Lieu fee is one -tenth of one percent of an
eligible development project in excess of $100,000. Eligble uses of this fund include the design, acquisition, installation,
improvement, maintenance and insurance of public artwork; offering of performing arts programs on City property for the
community; and art education programs on City property for the community.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 395 - 2018 FINANCING LEASE (CIVIC CENTER) FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In 2,075,512 2,077,767 1,037,967 2,077,767 0 0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources 2,075,512 2,077,767 1,037,967 2,077,767 0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 2,075,512 2,077,767 1,037,967 2,077,767 0 0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 2,075,512 2,077,767 1,037,967 2,077,767 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 0 0
Fund Balance, End of Year 0 0 0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the payment of interest and principal of the refunding of the 2001 and 2008 Certificates of
Participation (COPs). The 2001 COPS were originally issued to finance the construction of the Community Recreation Center and the
2008 COPS were originally issued to finance the construction of the Civic Center. In Fiscal Year 2018-19, the terms of the lease were
refinanced, lowering the interest rate from 3.75% to 3.42%. The term of the lease expires September 1, 2033.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 396 - 2018 FINANCING LEASE (MRC) FUND
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised
Requested
Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In 555,807 555,808 277,904 555,808
0
0.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources 555,807 555,808 277,904 555,808
0
0.0
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 555,807 555,808 277,904 555,808
0
0.0
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 555,807 555,808 277,904 555,808
0
0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 0 0 0 0
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 0 0 0
Fund Balance, End of Year 0 0 0
Fund Description
This fund was established to account for the payments of interest and principal related to the financing of the rehabilitation of the
Margarita Recreation Center (MRC). The Lease Agreement, dated August 1, 2018, generated $6.5 million in proceeds at
an interest
rate of 3.42%. The Term of the lease expires September 1, 2033,
EXHIBIT C
Internal Service Funds
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 300 - INSURANCE FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services 1,284,285
1,092,120
745,955
1,092,120 0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 19,195
5,700
(486)
5,700 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 1,303,480
1,097,820
745,469
1,097,820 0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits 53,192
86,526
36,619
86,526 0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance 823,972
1,056,843
763,655
1,056,843 0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 877,164
1,143,369
800,274
1,143,369 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 426,316
(45,549)
(54,805)
(45,549) 0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 321,774
748,090
748,090
Fund Balance, End of Year 748,090
702,540
702,540
Fund Description
The Insurance Fund was established to account for the City's liability and property insurance costs. Fund Balance is a combination
of both spendable and non spendable assets. These costs are allocated
to each department
based on the total number of Full
Time
Equivalent positions assigned to those departments. The City has a Self -Insured Retention (SIR)
of $150,000 per incident, and
strives to maintain a fund balance equal to three times the SIR.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 305 - WORKERS' COMPENSATION FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
488,843
0
0
0
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
41,747
13,000
(652)
13,000
0 0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
1,071
0
0
0
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
531,660
13,000
(652)
13,000
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
31,357
68,695
28,369
68,695
0 0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
125,759
210,084
173,273
210,084
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
157,116
278,779
201,642
278,779
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
374,544
(265,779)
(202,294)
(265,779)
0 0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
2,001,981
2,376,525
2,376,525
Fund Balance, End of Year
2,376,525
2,110,746
2,110,746
Fund Description
The Workers' Compensation Fund was established in Fiscal Year
2014-15 as the City transitions to a self -insured status for Workers'
Compensation liabilities. Departments are charged
based on each position allocated on a Full Time Equivalent basis, with a cost
assigned to each position based on job duties and potential for
risk. The desired Net Position for this fund is $1.5
million, which
represents three -times the City's Self -Insured Retention amount of $500,000.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
FUND: 310 - VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
182,011
378,076
103,838
378,076
0 0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
45,796
13,300
(549)
13,300
0 0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
0
500,000
0
500,000
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
227,807
891,376
103,289
891,376
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
214,593
0
0
0
0 0.0 %
Capital Outlay
0
136,616
10,433
11,616
(125,000) -91.5 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
214,593
136,616
10,433
11,616
(125,000) -91.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
13,214
754,760
92,857
879,760
125,000 16.6 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
3,787,535
3,800,749
3,800,749
Fund Balance, End of Year
3,800,749
4,555,508
4,680,508
Fund Description
The Vehicles and Equipment Fund was established to account for the depreciation
of vehicles and capital equipment over their
estimated useful lives, and to accumulate resources for the purchase of future
replacement
vehicles and equipment. Fund Balance
is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets.
Departments are charged based
on the replacement
costs for each
asset benefitting the department.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 320 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
3,817,577
4,313,104
2,202,538
4,313,104
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
14,217
5,100
587
5,100
0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
0
0
172
0
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
160,000
260,000
65,000
260,000
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
3,991,794
4,578,204
2,268,296
4,578,204
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
2,008,780
1,978,496
990,244
1,978,496
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
1,836,705
3,109,216
1,767,569
3,109,216
0
0.0 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
2,660
0
1,330
0
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,848,146
5,087,712
2,759,143
5,087,712
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
143,648
(509,508)
(490,846)
(509,508)
0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
966,825
1,110,473
1,110,473
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,110,473
600,965
600,965
Fund Description
The Information Technology Fund was established to fund and
account for computer and telephone system operating and
maintenance expenses. Fund Balance is a combination
of both spendable and
non spendable
assets. Adjustments are made to
Fund Balance to include additional spendable resources available for expenditure. Departments are charged
based on the number
of electronic devices assigned. The Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library
facility is charged directly for all IT expenditures and
personnel costs related to the facility.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 325 - TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description Actuals
Budget 12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services 185,962
202,824 78,690
202,824
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 30,573
9,400 (273)
9,400
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S 0
500,000 0
500,000
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 216,535
712,224 78,417
712,224
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance 284,592
0 0
0
0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay 34,717
379,002 84,645
379,002
0
0.0 %
Transfers 0
763,534 0
763,534
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 319,309
1,142,536 84,645
1,142,536
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (102,774)
(430,312) (6,228)
(430,312)
0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 1,762,778
1,660,004
1,660,004
Fund Balance, End of Year 1,660,004
1,229,692
1,229,692
Fund Description
The Technology Replacement Fund was established in Fiscal Year
2014-15 in order to accumulate resources
for computer
and
telephone equipment and software to fund future equipment replacement. Fund Balance
is a combination of both spendable and
non spendable assets. Contributions to this fund are made by departments utilizing the assets
in an amount equivalent to the
estimated cost to replace the item at the end of its useful life.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 330 - SUPPORT SERVICES FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20 Current Actuals
Revised
Requested Current
Description
Actuals Budget 12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
320,688 379,276 116,876
379,276
0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
256 100 23
100
0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
320,944 379,376 116,899
379,376
0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
223,596 229,352 98,754
229,352
0 0.0
Operations & Maintenance
97,874 147,418 106,544
147,418
0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
321,470 376,769 205,299
376,769
0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(526) 2,607 (88,400)
2,607
0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
3,230 2,704
2,704
Fund Balance, End of Year
2,704 5,310
5,310
Fund Description
The Support Services Fund was established as a cost
center for the City's central receptionist,
duplicating, printing, and mailing
activities. It is also used to depreciate all related
copying and mailing equipment over their
useful lives, and to accumulate
resources for the purchase of future equipment.
Fund Balance is a combination of both spendable and non spendable assets.
Departments are charged based on a count of copies made in the previous fiscal year.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 335 - SUPPORT SERVICES REPLACEMENT FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
36,388
26,424
13,212
26,424
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
6,917
2,100
(83)
2,100
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
43,305
28,524
13,129
28,524
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
59,331
0
0
0
0
0.0
Capital Outlay
0
60,000
59,454
60,000
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
59,331
60,000
59,454
60,000
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(16,025)
(31,476)
(46,324)
(31,476)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
437,285
421,259
421,259
Fund Balance, End of Year
421,259
389,783
389,783
Fund Description
The Support Services Replacement Fund was established
to accumulate resources for the future replacement of the City's
duplicating equipment.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 340 - FACILITIES FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
1,256,593
1,390,890
580,606
1,390,890
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
9,668
3,300
38S
3,300
0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
34,845
0
10,564
40,000
40,000
100.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,301,106
1,394,190
591,555
1,434,190
40,000
2.9 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
381,292
342,301
178,539
342,301
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
893,630
1,019,1S4
6SS,S80
1,009,1S4
(10,000)
-1.0 %
Transfers
0
0
412,056
412,056
412,0S6
100.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,274,922
1,361,455
1,246,175
1,763,511
402,056
29.5 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
26,185
32,735
(654,619)
(329,321)
(362,056)
-1,106.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
559,509
585,694
585,694
Fund Balance, End of Year
585,694
618,429
256,373
Fund Description
The Facilities Fund was established to account for the cost of the Civic Center, Former City
Hall Facility, City Maintenance Facility,
Field Operations Center, and Civic Center Parking Structure operations and maintenance.
Fund Balance
is a combination
of both
spendable and non spendable assets. Departments are charged based on square
footage allotted as well
as full time staff
equivalents assigned.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 350 - FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Charges For Services
29,412
0
17,210
48,583
48,583
100.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
3,511
1,700
(382)
1,700
0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
600,000
500,000
125,000
500,000
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
632,923
501,700
141,828
550,283
48,583
9.7 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
62,507
0
0
0
0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay
0
150,000
0
65,000
(85,000)
-56.7 %
Transfers
300,000
300,000
300,000
300,000
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
362,507
450,000
300,000
365,000
(85,000)
-18.9 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
270,416
51,700
(158,172)
185,283
133,583
258.4 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
350,817
621,233
621,233
Fund Balance, End of Year
621,233
672,933
806,516
Fund Description
The Facility Replacement Fund was established to accumulate resources for the future replacement of equipment, systems and
fixtures within City -owned facilities.
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF
THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE FISCAL
YEAR 2020-21 ANNUAL OPERATING BUDGETS
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES
DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The purpose of this review is to conduct an analysis of revenues and
expenditures to ensure that the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) maintains a
prudent and healthy fiscal position.
Section 2. That each year a Mid -Year review is conducted of all Temecula
Community Services (TCSD) operating budgets.
Section 3. That the Mid -Year review has been completed and the recommended
adjustments are reflected in the schedules attached hereto as Exhibit A.
Section 4. That the Fiscal Year 2020-21 TCSD operating budgets are amended in
accordance with the attached schedules.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula
Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of February, 2021.
Zak Schwank, President
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, Secretary
[SEAL]
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of
Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2021- was duly and
regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the
City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2021, by the following
vote:
AYES: BOARD MEMBERS:
NOES: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS:
ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, Secretary
N
EXHIBIT A
Temecula Community
Services District
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 190 - TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Taxes and Franchises
Special Tax (Measure C)
1,840,763
1,880,264
43,941
1,880,264
0
0.0 %
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Development Impact Fees
542
0
10
10
10
100.0 %
Contract Classes
705,811
500,000
52,708
250,000
(250,000)
-50.0 %
Classes/Activities
33,318
20,458
15,466
20,500
42
0.2 %
Facility Rentals
235,923
246,152
67,367
149,215
(96,937)
-39.4 %
Aquatics
106,819
82,000
35,144
68,000
(14,000)
-17.1 %
Museum Admissions
52,186
44,250
277
5,500
(38,750)
-87.6 %
Theater Admissions
208,484
190,134
743
29,000
(161,134)
-84.7 %
Sports Leagues & Tournaments
111,332
127,828
5,587
93,563
(34,265)
-26.8 %
Day Camps
5,241
44,740
468
44,740
0
0.0 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
0
50
0
50
0
0.0 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
13,026
2,800
413
2,800
0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Capital Improvement Program
19,322
0
0
0
0
0.0 %
Other Reimbursements
57,000
69,894
19,739
229,894
160,000
228.9 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
8,439,182
8,297,243
3,074,311
7,897,243
(400,000)
-4.8 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
66,148
53,000
11,048
16,913
(36,087)
-68.1 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
11,895,098
11,558,813
3,327,221
10,687,692
(871,121)
-7.5 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
6,643,722
6,726,387
3,080,904
6,622,905
(103,482)
-1.5 %
Operations & Maintenance
3,068,186
3,415,314
1,627,620
2,723,546
(691,768)
-20.3 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
1,600,286
1,729,689
886,732
1,729,689
0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay
47,793
10,000
0
234,000
224,000
2,240.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
11,359,987
11,881,390
5,595,256
11,310,140
(571,250)
-4.8 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
535,111
(322,577)
(2,268,035)
(622,448)
(299,871)
93.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
310,634
845,744
845,744
Fund Balance, End of Year
845,744
523,167
223,296
Fund Description
Citywide Operations reflects the collection of the Special Tax (Measure C) charged to households for recreation programs as well as
fees for classes and activities. Accounts for facility operations,
maintenance, and community
recreation
programs. Measure C was
approved by residents in 1997 at a rate of $74.44 per parcel for
the purpose of maintaining the City's parks, recreation facilities,
arerial street lighting and traffic signals. The Special Tax revenue
is allocated equally between TCSD and
the General Fund
to fund
both recreation programs and parks maintenance.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 192 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B"
STREET LIGHTS FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
634,456
640,767
11,182
640,767 0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
327
0
(15)
0 0
0.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Contribution From Measure S
71,037
73,168
18,292
73,168 0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
705,819
713,935
29,460
713,935 0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
23,572
22,718
10,048
22,718 0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
4S5,048
553,005
98,959
553,005 0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
478,620
575,723
109,007
575,723 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
227,199
138,212
(79,547)
138,212 0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
30,169
257,367
257,367
Fund Balance, End of Year
257,367
395,580
395,580
Fund Description
Service Level B reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners.
Service Level B includes only
those
parcels within residential subdivisions that receive residential street lighting
services. This
service level includes operational,
administrative, maintenance and utility costs of residential street lights.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 194 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
8,331,536
8,634,245
156,151
8,634,245
0
0.0
Recycling Program
5,000
18,500
0
18,500
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
12,520
1,200
(129)
1,200
0
0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
0
23,000
0
23,000
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
8,349,056
8,676,945
156,022
8,676,945
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
66,141
59,460
29,356
59,460
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
8,410,603
8,626,523
4,274,977
8,626,523
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,476,744
8,685,983
4,304,333
8,685,983
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(127,688)
(9,038)
(4,148,311)
(9,038)
0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
275,509
147,821
147,821
Fund Balance, End of Year
147,821
138,783
138,783
Fund Description
Service Level D Fund is used to collect benefit assessments charged
to property owners for the purpose of providing refuse
collection, recycling, and street sweeping throughout
the City,
which is provided
by CR&R.
In addition, Service
Level D has received
grants to increase recycling efforts Citywide.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 195 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current Actuals
Revised Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget 12-31-2020
Budget Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
5,475
5,532 461
5,532 0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
416
120 (18)
120 0
0.0 %
Reimbursements
Other Reimbursements
0
0 7,050
7,050 7,050
100.0
Total Revenues and Other Sources
5,890
5,652 7,493
12,702 7,050
124.7 %
Expenditures by Category
Operations & Maintenance
5,410
15,150 0
15,150 0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
5,410
15,150 0
15,150 0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
480
(9,498) 7,493
(2,448) 7,050
-74.2 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
20,298
20,778
20,778
Fund Balance, End of Year
20,778
11,280
18,330
Fund Description
Service Level R Fund reflects the operational, administrative, construction and maintenance costs for certain unpaved roads
that
become inaccessible after inclement weather. Zone
R-1 provides service in the Nicolas/Liefer Road area. The maximum rate that
can be charged for Zone R-1 for an improved parcel is $115.26
and for an unimproved parcel is $57.62.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 196 - TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
236,303
246,732
9,995
246,732
0
0.0
Harveston Lake Boat Revenue
3,977
4,200
2,416
4,200
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
8,139
2,300
(37)
2,300
0
0.0 %
Miscellaneous
Miscellaneous
0
0
390
0
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
248,420
253,232
12,764
253,232
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
24,887
2S,849
12,842
2S,849
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
223,204
245,824
204,166
245,824
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
248,091
271,673
217,009
271,673
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
329
(18,441)
(204,244)
(18,441)
0
0.0 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
418,660
418,989
418,989
Fund Balance, End of Year
418,989
400,548
400,548
Fund Description
Service Level L Fund reflects the benefit assessments
charged to property owners for the purpose of maintaining
the Harveston Lake
Park. Expenditures include operational, administrative
and maintenance
costs.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 197 - TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND
% Change
2020-21
Year to Date
2020-21 Q2
from
2019-20
Current
Actuals
Revised
Requested
Current
Description
Actuals
Budget
12-31-2020
Budget
Adjustments
Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Printing & Copies
11,735
5,400
443
886
(4,514)
-83.6 %
Fines and Forfeitures
Fines & Forfeitures
48,796
15,250
1,197
1,697
(13,553)
-88.9 %
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
7,407
2,200
(155)
2,200
0
0.0 %
Lease/Rental Income
11,792
5,000
(1,152)
0
(5,000)
-100.0 %
Operating Transfers In
Operating Transfers In
(93)
0
0
0
0
0.0 %
Contribution From Measure S
921,203
847,181
211,795
847,181
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,000,840
875,031
212,129
851,964
(23,067)
-2.6 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
117,436
113,419
61,426
113,419
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
422,998
575,063
288,257
489,220
(85,843)
-14.9 %
Internal Service Fund Allocations
293,955
401,913
153,630
401,913
0
0.0 %
Capital Outlay
4,958
0
0
0
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
839,347
1,090,394
503,313
1,004,552
(85,843)
-7.9 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
161,493
(215,363)
(291,183)
(152,588)
62,776
-29.1 %
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
221,160
382,653
382,653
Fund Balance, End of Year
382,653
167,289
230,065
Fund Description
The Library Fund is used to account for the maintenance
and operations
of the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library on Pauba
Road.
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 501 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments 37,358 37,932 465 37,932 0 0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest 151 12 10 12 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources 37,508 37,944 474 37,944 0 0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits 17 2 1 2 0 0.0
Operations & Maintenance 41,612 40,047 33,072 40,047 0 0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses 41,629 40,049 33,073 40,049 0 0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures (4,121) (2,105) (32,599) (2,105) 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year 15,880 11,759 11,759
Fund Balance, End of Year 11,759 9,653 9,653
Fund Description
Service Level C Fund reflects the collection of benefit assessments charged to property owners for the purpose of providing
perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance throughout the City. Service Level C assesses only those parcels within residential
subdivisions receiving TCSD perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance and are separated into 32 zones. The rate levels for
Zones 6 and 29, are subject to a Consumer Price Index -Urban Consumers (CPI-U) annual inflator while all other rate levels will not
increase. Zones 30-32 will not be assessed, as the property owners have elected to have the landscaping maintained by the
respective Homeowner's Associations (HOAs).
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 502 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
42,103
42,542
445
42,542
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,985
575
(23)
575
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
44,089
43,117
422
43,117
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
826
24
23
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
33,822
44,937
33,993
44,937
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
34,649
44,961
34,015
44,961
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
9,440
(1,844)
(33,593)
(1,844)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
96,889
106,329
106,329
Fund Balance, End of Year
106,329
104,485
104,485
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 503 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
46,740
47,328
297
47,328
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
693
170
4
170
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
47,433
47,498
300
47,498
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
20
24
12
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
46,339
48,841
33,201
48,841
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
46,359
48,865
33,213
48,865
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,073
(1,367)
(32,913)
(1,367)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
40,634
41,707
41,707
Fund Balance, End of Year
41,707
40,340
40,340
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 504 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
6,417
6,394
0
6,394
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
56
12
1
12
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
6,473
6,406
1
6,406
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
165
24
14
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
6,362
6,394
4,590
6,394
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
6,527
6,418
4,604
6,418
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(54)
(12)
(4,603)
(12)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
4,260
4,206
4,206
Fund Balance, End of Year
4,206
4,194
4,194
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 505 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
38,518
39,025
440
39,025
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
452
120
4
120
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
38,970
39,145
444
39,145
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
826
24
23
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
40,241
39,389
29,413
39,389
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
41,068
39,413
29,436
39,413
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(2,098)
(268)
(28,991)
(268)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
29,240
27,142
27,142
Fund Balance, End of Year
27,142
26,874
26,874
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 506 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
25,853
678
26,761
190
0
(5)
26,761
190
0
0
0.0
0.0
26,531
26,951
(5)
26,951
0
0.0 %
418
20,914
24
29,413
17
20,762
24
29,413
0
0
0.0
0.0 %
21,332
29,437
20,779
29,437
0
0.0 %
5,199
(2,486)
(20,784)
(2,486)
0
0.0
34,049
39,248
39,248
39,248
36,762
36,762
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 507 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
16,750
15,308
223
15,308
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
65
1
4
1
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
16,815
15,309
226
15,309
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
826
2
12
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
13,252
14,384
10,084
14,384
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
14,079
14,386
10,096
14,386
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,736
923
(9,869)
923
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
4,835
7,571
7,571
Fund Balance, End of Year
7,571
8,494
8,494
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 508 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
136,801
137,025
1,093
137,025
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,736
450
21
450
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
138,537
137,475
1,113
137,475
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
10,478
12,005
6,017
12,005
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
122,032
138,406
104,550
138,406
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
132,510
150,411
110,567
150,411
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
6,027
(12,936)
(109,454)
(12,936)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
107,352
113,379
113,379
Fund Balance, End of Year
113,379
100,443
100,443
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 509 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
5,082
5,106
1
5,106
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
581
175
(9)
175
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
5,663
5,281
(8)
5,281
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
61
2
2
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
3,868
5,770
2,868
5,770
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
3,930
5,773
2,870
5,773
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,733
(492)
(2,878)
(492)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
27,264
28,997
28,997
Fund Balance, End of Year
28,997
28,506
28,506
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 510 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
9,686
9,744
58
9,744
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
229
60
0
60
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,915
9,804
58
9,804
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
331
24
16
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
9,339
9,473
6,656
9,473
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
9,670
9,497
6,672
9,497
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
245
307
(6,613)
307
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
13,082
13,326
13,326
Fund Balance, End of Year
13,326
13,633
13,633
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 511 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
2,450
2,450
0
2,450
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
56
15
0
15
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,506
2,465
0
2,465
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
102
2
2
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
1,959
2,374
1,512
2,374
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,061
2,376
1,514
2,376
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
445
89
(1,514)
89
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
2,990
3,435
3,435
Fund Balance, End of Year
3,435
3,524
3,524
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 512 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
95,254
1,965
96,396
550
2,411
0
96,396
550
0
0
0.0
0.0
97,219
96,946
2,411
96,946
0
0.0 %
4,903
85,331
6,003
102,656
3,090
74,516
6,003
102,656
0
0
0.0
0.0 %
90,234
108,658
77,606
108,658
0
0.0 %
6,985
(11,712)
(75,195)
(11,712)
0
0.0
110,022
117,007
117,007
117,007
105,294
105,294
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 513 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
34,026
34,224
438
34,224
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
420
100
4
100
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
34,446
34,324
441
34,324
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
826
600
301
600
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
31,025
34,931
25,551
34,931
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
31,851
35,532
25,853
35,532
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,595
(1,208)
(25,412)
(1,208)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
25,436
28,031
28,031
Fund Balance, End of Year
28,031
26,823
26,823
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 514 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
14,507
14,774
223
14,774
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
139
25
2
25
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
14,646
14,799
225
14,799
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
252
2
4
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
12,897
14,831
9,551
14,831
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
13,149
14,833
9,555
14,833
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,497
(34)
(9,331)
(34)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
8,942
10,439
10,439
Fund Balance, End of Year
10,439
10,405
10,405
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 515 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
9,800
9,800
0
9,800
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
143
35
0
35
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,943
9,835
0
9,835
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
217
2
4
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
7,302
8,973
6,221
8,973
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
7,520
8,975
6,225
8,975
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,423
860
(6,225)
860
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
8,035
10,458
10,458
Fund Balance, End of Year
10,458
11,317
11,317
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 516 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
Total Revenues and Other Sources
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
Salaries & Benefits
Operations & Maintenance
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
Fund Balance, End of Year
Fund Description
37,188 37,800 525 37,800 0 0.0
1,109
300
(8)
300
0
0.0
38,296
38,100
517
38,100
0
0.0 %
0
940
35,471
21,500
600
40,057
0
303
23,767
21,500
600
40,057
0
0
0
0.0
0.0 %
0.0 %
36,411
62,157
24,071
62,157
0
0.0 %
1,885
(24,057)
(23,554)
(24,057)
0
0.0
54,654
56,539
56,539
56,539
32,482
32,482
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 517 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
2,116
2,116
0
2,116
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
27
5
0
5
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
2,143
2,121
0
2,121
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
20
2
1
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
1,805
2,102
1,252
2,102
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,825
2,104
1,253
2,104
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
318
17
(1,253)
17
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,570
1,888
1,888
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,888
1,904
1,904
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 518 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
92,651
94,010
1,377
94,010
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
870
185
20
185
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
93,521
94,195
1,397
94,195
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
0
10,000
0
10,000
0
0.0
Salaries & Benefits
3,532
3,602
1,790
3,602
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
91,073
100,754
78,216
100,754
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
94,604
114,355
80,006
114,355
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(1,084)
(20,160)
(78,609)
(20,160)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
59,066
57,983
57,983
Fund Balance, End of Year
57,983
37,822
37,822
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 519 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
54,835
54,450
496
54,450
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,933
500
(4)
500
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
S6,768
S4,9SO
492
S4,9SO
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
2,255
5,042
2,464
5,042
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
55,580
62,340
46,180
62,340
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
S7,836
67,382
48,64S
67,382
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(1,068)
(12,432)
(48,152)
(12,432)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
97,215
96,147
96,147
Fund Balance, End of Year
96,147
83,715
83,715
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 520 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
175,486
177,975
1,721
177,975
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,014
1,100
(12)
1,100
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
179,500
179,075
1,709
179,075
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Transfers
0
30,803
0
30,803
0
0.0
Salaries & Benefits
6,556
12,005
5,962
12,005
0
0.0 %
Operations & Maintenance
153,843
185,752
129,991
185,752
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
160,399
228,560
135,953
228,560
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
19,101
(49,485)
(134,244)
(49,485)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
212,034
231,135
231,135
Fund Balance, End of Year
231,135
181,650
181,650
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 521 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
226,159
228,201
3,466
228,201
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
4,426
1,200
15
1,200
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
230,585
229,401
3,481
229,401
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
9,779
22,810
11,230
22,810
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
244,444
279,561
210,029
279,561
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
254,224
302,371
221,260
302,371
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(23,638)
(72,970)
(217,779)
(72,970)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
255,207
231,569
231,569
Fund Balance, End of Year
231,569
158,599
158,599
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 522 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
4,350
4,408
58
4,408
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
142
40
(2)
40
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
4,492
4,448
56
4,448
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
143
2
3
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
1,983
4,208
2,584
4,208
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,126
4,210
2,586
4,210
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,366
238
(2,530)
238
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
7,293
9,659
9,659
Fund Balance, End of Year
9,659
9,897
9,897
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 523 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
8,412
8,400
321
8,400
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
379
110
(5)
110
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
8,791
8,510
316
8,510
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
232
36
21
36
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
5,934
8,296
4,711
8,296
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
6,166
8,332
4,731
8,332
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
2,625
178
(4,416)
178
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
18,667
21,293
21,293
Fund Balance, End of Year
21,293
21,471
21,471
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 524 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
159,953
162,100
2,576
162,100
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
993
115
55
115
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
160,947
162,215
2,631
162,215
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
5,431
9,604
4,765
9,604
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
168,622
171,859
138,324
171,859
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
174,053
181,463
143,089
181,463
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(13,106)
(19,248)
(140,458)
(19,248)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
77,807
64,701
64,701
Fund Balance, End of Year
64,701
45,452
45,452
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 525 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
43,300
44,000
709
44,000
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
1,215
300
(6)
300
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
44,515
44,300
704
44,300
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
1,615
1,201
602
1,201
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
38,309
48,774
35,214
48,774
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
39,924
49,975
35,816
49,975
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
4,591
(5,675)
(35,112)
(5,675)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
63,681
68,272
68,272
Fund Balance, End of Year
68,272
62,597
62,597
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 526 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERY TRADITION FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
1,890
2,160
270
2,160
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
17
4
0
4
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
1,907
2,164
270
2,164
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
41
2
1
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
1,717
2,238
1,292
2,238
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
1,758
2,240
1,293
2,240
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
150
(76)
(1,023)
(76)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,133
1,283
1,283
Fund Balance, End of Year
1,283
1,206
1,206
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 527 - SERVICE LEVEL" C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
8,886
9,100
136
9,100
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
161
40
3
40
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
9,047
9,140
139
9,140
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
232
24
15
24
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
8,533
8,845
6,733
8,845
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
8,765
8,869
6,747
8,869
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
282
271
(6,609)
271
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
8,904
9,186
9,186
Fund Balance, End of Year
9,186
9,457
9,457
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 528 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
230,376
232,974
1,984
232,974
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
8,975
2,600
(438)
2,600
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
239,351
235,574
1,546
235,574
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
8,715
24,011
11,775
24,011
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
299,621
337,793
233,397
337,793
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
308,336
361,804
245,172
361,804
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
(68,985)
(126,230)
(243,626)
(126,230)
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
464,405
395,420
395,420
Fund Balance, End of Year
395,420
269,190
269,190
Fund Description
Alk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 529 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT FUND
% Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Licenses, Permits and Service Charges
Assessments
4,101
4,171
0
4,171
0
0.0
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
38
6
0
6
0
0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
4,139
4,177
0
4,177
0
0.0 %
Expenditures by Category
Salaries & Benefits
143
2
3
2
0
0.0
Operations & Maintenance
2,076
3,003
1,614
3,003
0
0.0 %
Total Expenditures and Other Financing
Uses
2,219
3,005
1,616
3,005
0
0.0 %
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
1,920
1,172
(1,617)
1,172
0
0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
1,628
3,548
3,548
Fund Balance, End of Year
3,548
4,721
4,721
Fund Description
IL
f
Adk
The Heart of Southern California
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Year 2020-21
Quarterly Budget Report
FUND: 530 - SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES FUND
Change
2020-21 Year to Date 2020-21 Q2 from
2019-20 Current Actuals Revised Requested Current
Description Actuals Budget 12-31-2020 Budget Adjustments Budget
Revenues by Source
Use of Money and Property
Investment Interest
759
0
(13) 0 0 0.0 %
Total Revenues and Other Sources
759
0
(13) 0 0 0.0
Excess of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures
759
0
(13) 0 0 0.0
Fund Balance, Beginning of Year
35,461
36,220
36,220
Fund Balance, End of Year
36,220
36,220
36,220
Fund Description
RESOLUTION NO. 2021-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2021-25 AND
AMENDING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
FOR FISCAL YEAR 2020-21
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Recitals. The City Council hereby finds, determines and declares that:
A. On June 3, 2020, the Planning Commission found the Capital Improvement
Program projects are consistent with the General Plan in accordance with
Government Code Section 65401 of State Planning and Zoning Law.
B. On June 9, 2020, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-42 approving
the City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2021-25
(CIP).
C. Adoption of the Amendments noted herein are categorically exempt from
environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA). Pursuant to Sections 15262 and 15061 (b) (3) of the State Guidelines
for Implementation of CEQA, a project involving only feasibility or planning
studies for possible future actions because it can be seen with certainty that this
prioritizing and fund allocation program set forth in the Amendment cannot
and does not have the potential to cause a significant effect on the environment.
No physical activity will occur until all required CEQA review is conducted at
the time the physical improvements prioritized in the Amendment are
undertaken. The Council reaffirms and incorporates herein the findings set
forth in Section 1 of Resolution No. 2020-42.
Section 2. Specific Actions: Based on the findings above, the City Council determines
and declares the following adjustments to the Fiscal Year "City of Temecula Capital Improvement
Program Fiscal Years 2021- 25" are hereby adopted:
A. Amend the 2020-21 appropriation for the Comprehensive General Plan Update
project, to allocate an additional $10,000 in 2020-21 Grants funding to reflect
an updated amount to be received from the Local Early Action Planning
(LEAP) Grant.
B. Amend the 2020-21 appropriation for the Sports Field Lighting — Light
Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion project, to allocate an additional $200,000
from the Temecula Energy Efficiency Asset (TEAM) Fund.
C. Amend the 2020-21 appropriation for the Sidewalks — Old Town
Improvements project, to allocate $280,000 in Measure S funds from the
Sidewalks — Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement project.
D. Amend the 2020-21 appropriation for the I-15 Congestion Relief project, to
allocate $100,000 in funding received from the City of Murrieta.
The budget and appropriation for these projects are set forth in Exhibit 1 and are hereby approved.
Section 3. Certification: The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 23rd day of February, 2021.
ATTEST:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
[SEAL]
Maryann Edwards, Mayor
N
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of February, 2021, by the following vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Randi Johl, City Clerk
EXHIBIT 1
Capital Improvement Program
�a
f
The Heo rt of Southern California
wlee Co try
1-15 CONGESTION RELIEF
Circulation Project
Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of a single auxiliary lane,
northbound Interstate 15 (1-15) connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho
California Road off -ramp.
Benefit: This project provides an operational improvement to relieve congestion on
northbound 1-15. It represents one of several operational improvements identified by the
Move 1-15 Regional Task Force to address congestion on 1-15.
Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity
Project Status: Project development is set to commence in Fiscal Year 2019-20.
Department: Public Works -Account No. 210.265.999.609 / PW19-02
Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2021-25
Capital Improvement Program
-7-..i;:_J0GH -
TEiEUL.A
VALLEY
2020-21
2020-21
Prior Years
2019-20
Mid -Year
Adjusted
2022
2022-23 2023-24
2024-25
Total Project
Project Cost:
Actuals
Adjusted
Request
Budget
Projected
Projected Projected
Projected
Cost
Administration
20,456
49,631
79,398
200,000
100,000
449,485
Construction
-
-
-
775,000
4,875,000
5,650,000
Construction Engineering
-
-
475,000
-
475,000
Design & Environmental
515-
412,599
100,000
889,126
-
-
1,302,240
Total Expenditures
1 20,971
462,230
100,000
968,524
1,450,000
4,975,000
7,876,725
Source of Funds:
General Fund
400,000
951,725 200,000 -
1,551,725
SHOPP
-
- - 1,250,000
1,250,000
Reimbursements
100,000 100,000
100,000
Unspecified
-
- - - 4,975,000
4,975,000
Total Funding
400,000
951,725 100,000 100,000 1,450,000 4,975,000
7,876,725
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:
Total Operating Costs
Notes :
1. (1) SHOPP - State Highway Operation and Protection Program and Minor Program
2. (2) Reimbursement of $100,000 from the City of Murrieta
COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: California State Law requires that each city adopt a comprehensive
General Plan as the fundamental policy document for future development. It provides the
framework for management and utilization of the City's physical, economic, and human
resources. This document guides civic decisions regarding land use, conservation of existing
housing and the provision of new dwelling units, the provisions of supporting infrastructure
and public services, the protection of environmental resources, the allocation of fiscal
resources, and the protection of residents from natural and human -caused hazards. The City's
General Plan was last updated in 2005. The General Plan will serve as the blueprint for the
community for approximately the next fifteen years. This project will update all of the
elements of the General Plan and will also include the implementation of new legislation to
ensure compliance with State Law.
Benefit: The General Plan update satisfies all six of the City's core values: Healthy and Livable
City; Economic Prosperity; Safe and Prepared Community; Sustainable City; Transportation,
Mobility, and Connectivity; and Accountable and Responsive Local Government.
Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: This project is estimated to start in Fiscal Year 2021-22.
Department: Community Development - Account No. 210.265.999.777
Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2021-25
Capital Improvement Program
l]�
a
T h,. Fl n,, r[ cr' o; Inrrn C. n li fn
Wino Co try
2020-21
2020-21
Prior Years
2019-20 Mid -Year
Adjusted
2022
2022-23 2023-24
2024-25
Total Project
Project Cost:
Actuals
Adjusted Request
Budget
Projected
Projected Projected
Projected
Cost
Administration
10,000
310,000
1,000,000
200,000
1,510,000
Design & Environmental
500,000
500,000
Total Expenditures
10,000
310,000
1,000,000
700,000
2,010,000
Source of Funds:
General Fund I 800,000 700,000 1,500,000
Grants 10,000 310,000 200,000 1 510,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:
Total Operating Costs I I I
Notes :
1. (1) Grants funding represents $500,000 in Local Early Action Planning Grant Program (LEAP) funding provided by the California Department of Housing and Community
Development (HCD). LEAP provides one-time grant funding to cities and counties to update their planning documents and implement process improvements that will
facilitate the acceleration of housing production and help local governments prepare for their 6th cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA).
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2021-25
Capital Improvement Program
SIDEWALKS - OLD TOWN BOARDWALK ENHANCEMENT
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project will establish programs that will remove boardwalk plank
boards and replace them with colored concrete sidewalks stamped with wood grain finish
similar to what was installed with the new Main Street bridge.
Benefit: This project promotes a sustainable walkable surface that will require little
maintenance. New sidewalks will enhance American with Disabilities Act(ADA) access. It will
also promote a "walkable" community by connecting the City.
Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: Project is estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year 2019-20.
Department: Public Works -Account No. 210.265.999.696 / PW17-16
Level: I
2020-21
2020-21
Prior Years
2019-20
Mid -Year
Adjusted 2022
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Total Project
Project Cost:
Actuals
Adjusted
Request
Budget Projected
Projected Projected Projected
Cost
Administration
231,473
176,776
-
408,249
Construction
77,482
585,257
(280,000)
24,170
686,909
Construction Engineering
1
37,407
-
37,407
Total Expenditures
1 308,9561
799,439
(280,000)
24,170
1,132,565
Measure S I 710,000 164,529 (280,000) (280,000) I 594,529
Total Funding 1 922,7451 489,820 (280,000) (280,000) 1,132,565
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:
Total Operating Costs
�a
f
The Hear[ of Southern CaliFo-ia
Wine Country
SIDEWALKS -OLD TOWN IMPROVEMENTS
Infrastructure Project
Project Description: This project is comprised of adding new sidewalks, paving, street lights
and trees on both sides of 5th Street from Old Town Front Street to the Murrieta Creek
Channel.
Benefit: This project will provide walking surfaces for pedestrians.
Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity
Project Status: Project is expected to be completed in Fiscal Year 2019-20.
Department: Public Works -Account No. 210.265.999.766 / PW17-04
Level: I
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2021-25
Capital Improvement Program
2020-21
2020-21
Prior Years
2019-20
Mid -Year
Adjusted 2022
2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Total Project
Project Cost:
Actuals
Adjusted
Request
Budget Projected
Projected Projected Projected
Cost
Administration
341,298
5,463
25,000
25,023
371,784
Construction
834,462
71,972
200,000
315,176
1,221,610
Construction Engineering
30,850
15,000
28,900
59,750
Design & Environmental
90,981
40,000
54,022
145,003
Total Expenditures
1,297,591
77,435
280,000
423,121
1,798,147
Source of Funds:
C D BG
653,492
149,655
803,147
Measure A
140,000
140,000
Measure S
400,000
175,000 280,000 280,000
855,000
Total Funding
1,193,492
324,655 280,000 280,000
1,798,147
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:
Total Operating Costs
>
11,e Hear[ of Southern CalfFo-ia
Wine Country
City of Temecula
Fiscal Years 2021-25
Capital Improvement Program
SPORTS FIELD LIGHTING - LIGHT EMITTING DIODE (LED) CONVERSION
Parks/Recreation Project
Project Description: This project provides for the replacement of the aging sports field lighting
components with new LED technology at various sports parks.
Benefit: This project enhances the safety of sport field users, reduces unnecessary light
pollution and increases energy efficiency at City parks.
Core Value: Healthy and Livable City
Project Status: Project will be completed on an on -going basis as funding becomes available.
Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.113
Level: I
2020-21 2020-21
Prior Years
2019-20 Mid -Year Adjusted 2022 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25
Total Project
Project Cost:
Actuals
Adjusted Request Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected
Cost
Construction
77,824
339,629 200,000 412,547
830,000
Total Expenditures
77,824
339,629 200,000 412,547
830,000
TEAM
MeasUFund re SI 250,0001 280,000 200,000 200,000 200,000
Total Funding 1 250,0001 280,000 200,000 300,000 830,000
Future Operating & Maintenance Costs:
Total Operating Costs
Item No. 10
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Discuss and Provide Direction Regarding an Alternate Facility to Serve as the Base
of Operations for the Sheriff's Deputies Assigned to Temecula, a Temecula Police
Station within the City Limits (At the Request of Council Member Stewart)
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Discuss the current Base of Operations, the Southwest Station, the current
deployment model, and the concept of shifting to a Base of Operations within the City
Limits; and
2. Provide direction on exploring an alternate Base of Operations, if, after discussion,
the Council wishes to do so. Additionally, consider forming a City Council ad -hoc
subcommittee to guide the process.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula contracts for policing services with the Riverside
County Sheriff. Currently, sheriff's deputies assigned to the City of Temecula use the Southwest
Sheriff Station on Auld Road as their base of operations. Patrol Deputies are deployed into the
City at the beginning of each shift. Typically, deputies respond to calls for service from their
assigned patrol areas.
The Southwest Sheriff Station is one component of the Southwest Justice Center complex which
also includes the Southwest Detention Center (the local jail), local offices for the district attorney
and the Riverside county courts.
Council Member Stewart placed this item on the agenda to facilitate a Council discussion on the
concept of having the sheriff's deputies assigned to Temecula operate out of a Police Station
located within the City Limits. The outcome of that discussion will drive the second
recommendation included above.
FISCAL IMPACT: Should the Council provide direction to explore the feasibility of relocating
the City's policing base of operations to a facility within the city limits it may be necessary to
engage the services of a consultant through an RFP/RFQ process. The actual fiscal impact will be
determined at the time of award and require separate Council action.
ATTACHMENTS: None
Item No. 11
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development
Department monthly report.
The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of January 2021.
VIRTUAL TRANSITION
The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated the virtual shift of many functions of the City, and Community
Development in particular. Community Development, in collaboration with Business License, Fire, Land
Development, Police, and IT, shifted all Permit Center services online in under one week. Building and
Safety has implemented virtual inspections utilizing FaceTime. While keeping the health and safety of
staff and the community as the top priority, the division has been able to increase the volume of
inspections conducted, and keep projects moving with this new process. Community Development
resumed public hearings and meetings in April by shifting to virtual meetings, conducted via Zoom.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
Planning processed 42 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted four (4)
Public Hearings in January 2021. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report.
Plan Type
January 2021
Long Range ProjeAs
9
Accessary Dwelling
1
Conditional Use Permit
2
Develapment Plan
5
Home Occupation
23
Massage Permits
5
Minor Exception
1
Mod ifications
12
Pre -Application
3
Temporary Use Permit
1
Wireless Antenna Facility
3
Total
6S
Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately
60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison
Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Multi -Family Density Core (PA20-1219, 20-1459): The City is processing a
Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map for a 376-unit multi -family community consisting of
townhomes, motorcourt duplexes, and bungalow 3-packs built on 31.49 acres. The project includes a
paseo connecting the project to the recreation center and sports park, a dog run, play areas, parks,
barbecue areas, bocce ball, and a ninja course. The project is located within Planning Areas 28 & 29 of
Sommers Bend. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend PA15 HPR (PA20-1454): The City is processing a Home Product Review for Planning
Area 15 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for three (3) unique detached single-family plans
with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 45 lots. (CARDENAS)
Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PAs 20-1414, 20-1415, 20-1416): The City is
processing Home Product Reviews for a total of 57 single family lots. This phase is located on the
southern and eastern boundaries of the project, are the larger 20,000 square foot minimum lots and
encompasses Planning Areas 19, 20B, and 21. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PA20-1461): The City is processing Home Product
Review for a total of 115 single family lots located in Planning Area 17A. (COOPER)
Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PA20-1321): The City is processing Home Product
Review for a total of 74 single family lots located in Planning Area 18A. (COOPER)
Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a
Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map
(TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan
Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from
Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay
Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal
impact analysis. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150
feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER)
Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract
Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of
Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER)
Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the
construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning
Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street. approximately 900 feet south of
Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER)
Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan
and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling
pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480
Sanborn Ave. (COOPER)
Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a
Second Amendment to the Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Winchester Hills
I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development
Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property
located within Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER)
LONG RANGE PLANNING
Temporary Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: As the State of California and
Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions related to the COVID 19 pandemic, City Council has
directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local economic activity
while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has developed the Temporary
Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these challenging times. On May 29, 2020,
the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee (Naggar/Schwank) received a presentation from staff
regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. Staff provided updates to the City
Council on July 14, 2020. Approximately 50 businesses have participated in the program throughout the
City. (RABIDOU, WATSON)
CEQA Traffic Impact Analysis - VMT Thresholds and Guidelines (LR18-1506): Per the
requirements of SB 743, the City was required to update its Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to
facilitate compliance with Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT). The City transitioned from level of service
(LOS) based to VMT based before the state deadline of July 1, 2020. On January 28 and April 23, 2020,
Staff met with the General Plan Update Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and
Council Member Rahn. The Planning Commission approved the Guidelines on April 22. On April 23,
the project was presented to the Public Traffic Safety Commission. On May 26, 2020, the City Council
approved the CEQA Transportation VMT Analysis Guidelines. Fehr & Peers has developed a tailored
VMT forecasting tool. Staff has finalized the VMT forecasting tool and the formation of the TIA
Guidelines with the Fehr & Peers. The City of Temecula's Updated TIA Guidelines and the VMT
forecasting tool is now available to use by the public on Public Works webpage. (TOMA)
Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant from
the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective Design
and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with the goal of
expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the foundation for
future regulations and housing laws. Staff is developing Objective Design Standards that will conform
with SB 35, and will incorporate objective design guidelines into the City's Development Code. Staff
has hired P1aceWorks, to assist with development of our design standards for multifamily and mixed
use. On September 28, 2020, staff and Consultant presented six architectural styles to the PC Infill
Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo. The Subcommittee agreed with
staff s six recommended styles. On October 13, 2020, staff and Consultant presented to the CC Infill
Subcommittee consisting of Council Member Naggar and Rahn, the six recommended architecture
styles. The Council Members agreed with staffs recommendation to move forward with detailing the
styles for the Objective Design Standards. Early December, the consultant provided staff with a first
draft of the ODS document. Staff reviewed and provided comments/edits. Currently, the consultant is
reviewing staffs comments will provide an updated draft mid -January. (TOMA, RABIDOU)
Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit
Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of
ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained
at the community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on
PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review
of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. Staff is working with the
consultant to execute the contract. Work is anticipated to begin mid -January. (TOMA, RABIDOU)
Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail
Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying
a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS)
HOUSING
Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit
affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community
building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan
Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation
bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020.
The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. CHW will apply for funding
through the State in 2021. (RABIDOU, WATSON)
Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with
Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned
property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior
to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State
Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the
Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. (WATSON)
Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo Planning
Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process,
community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of
Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The
Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing
needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs.
The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and
Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting
of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies.
Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October
2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant
to update data and write draft chapters. (RABIDOU, TOMA, PETERS)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG)
Temecula Assist: On Thursday, May 21, 2020, during the City Council Budget Workshop, the
Temecula City Council gave the greenlight to a half million dollars in aid for Temecula small businesses.
The program, branded as Temecula Assist, is a set of two small business emergency relief grants
designated for Temecula business owners coping with the financial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Temecula Assist is comprised of two grants: Rent Recovery and Job Retention Grant (funded through
CDBG-CV) and a Business Improvement Grant (funded through the General Fund). The application
period was May 26th through June 9th. The Substantial Amendment to the 2019-20 CDBG Annual Action
Plan was approved at a public hearing at City Council on June 9, 2020. The grant program will assist 67
local businesses. (WATSON)
CDBG Administration: The 2020-21 Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) for CDBG funding was
released in November 2019. Two technical workshops were held for applicants on December 12, 2019.
The Finance Committee provided recommendations for the 2020-21 program on March 10, 2020. City
Council approved the following recommendations on April 28, 2020. (WATSON)
Finance
Organization Project Name Program Description Committee
0 0 0 RecommendatioiJ
Assistance League of Temecula Valley Operation School Bell Clothing & supplies for low $5,491
income students in TVUSD
Round trip school transportation;
Boys &Girls Clubs of Southwest County Before and After School Care activities before and after school $5,491
Canine Support Teams, Inc.
Service Dogs for Disabled
Provide service and assistance
$5,491
Persons
dogs to people with disabilities.
Homeless Prevention and
Connecting homeless individuals
City of Temecula
with services and financial
$20,000
Diversion Program
assistance
Community Mission of Hope
Housing Resource Center
Provide case management for
$5,491
homeless; food pantry
Fair housing education, training,
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County
Comprehensive Fair Housing
technical assistance; landlord/
$20,000
Program
tenant mediation
Hospice of the Valleys
Senior Assistance Program
Provide direct costs of hospice
$5,491
care for senior citizens
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Anti Violence Education and
Provide support and services to
$5,491
Crisis Intervention
survivors of sexual assault
Safe Alternatives for Everyone (SAFE)
Creating SAFE Families
Victim awareness; case
$5,491
management; support for victims
Voices for Children
Court Appointed Special
Case management and advocacy
$5,491
Advocate (CASA) Program
for foster children in Temecula
Total Public Service Funds Requested for 2020-21
$83,928
BUILDING & SAFETY
Building and Safety statistics for January 2021 are highlighted in the following table.
Building& Safety Statistics
January2021
Dermits
302
New Single Family Units
1
New Commercial Building
4
Photovoltaic
103
Tenant Improvements
8
Nan Can struction C of 0
18
Number of Active Plan Checks
200
Number of New Plan Checks
89
Number of Finaled Permits
203
Inspections
2,517
Inspections Per Day
139.8
Inspections Per Person Per Day
35.0
Stops Per Month
755.0
Visitors to Counter
0
New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check
• Truax Hotel (161,586 sf)
• Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf)
• Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each)
• Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos)
• iA Robotics (24,659 sf)
• Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester
• Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf)
• Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf)
• Temecula Valley Lexus Dealership (54,898 sf)
• Epic Dog Academy (5,887 sf)
• At Home (113,903 sf)
Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy
• Gearhart's Cabinet — 42345 Avenida Alvardo Suites A/B
• SpokeX Bike Shop — 43280 Business Park #102
Tenant Improvement
• Flip Flop Shop — 40754 Winchester Bldg F Suite 300
• Simon's Dole Whip — 27636 Ynez Rd Suite L-1
• Evolution Chiropractic & Wellness 31333 Temecula Parkway #140
CODE ENFORCEMENT
During the month of January, Code Enforcement responded to 157 web inquiries. In addition, the
division opened 166 code cases, conducted 263 inspections, and forwarded 20 referrals.
Type of Code Case
January 2021
Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle
1
Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance /infestation/ Mold
13
Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP
4
Trash and Debris Dumping
18
Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard
12
Green Pool I Vector Control /Stagnant Water
1
Graffiti
51
Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control
15
Trailer/ RV Store d/B a at/Pa rki ng
5
Construction w/o Permit/Building Code
12
Encroach Public ROW /Trash Cans
7
Zoning/Signs
5
Public Safety & Health
22
Total Number of Cases
155
Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor
foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties.
Foreclosure Tracking
January 2021
Residential - Default
12
Residential - Foreclosure
21
Residential - REO
23
Total - Residential
56
Commercial - Default
1
Commercial - Foreclosure
1
Commercial - REO
4
Total - tommercia1
G
ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report
PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant
PA21-0006 45105 Via Quivera 961-111-013 Jaime Cardenas 01/04/2021 01/06/2021 Carina
Temecula, CA 92592 Gustafsson
Case Title / Description: Carina's Therapy Service: a home occupation business license for psychotherapy
video consultations.
Company Owner
Plan Type Status
PL Home Approved
Occupation
PA21-0007 28495 Old Town Front St 922-026-008 Eric Jones 01/04/2021 Steve Rawlings CELIA PL Conditional Out
Temecula, CA 92590 SANCHEZ Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Mad Madeline's Minor Conditional Use Permit: A Minor Conditional Use Permit to
allow an existing restaurant to upgrade their current Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 41 License to an
ABC Type 47 License. The project is located at 28498 Old Town Front Street.
PA21-0017 40046 Walcott Ln 957-170-029 Jaime Cardenas 01/04/2021 01/06/2021 Javier Rodriguez
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: FCO Construction: a home occupation business license for a general contractor's
office.
PL Home Approved
Occupation
PA21-0018 28588 Old Town Front St 922-033-021 Jaime Cardenas 01/04/2021 Tamer Gergis Ronald Darling PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Topspin Building Window MOD: a modification application to modify previously
approved windows and create a veranda that serves food and beverages under the second -floor canopy for
Topspin Pizza & Pong, a future tenant in the building located at 28588 Old Town Front Street, Suite 200.
PA21-0019 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Jaime Cardenas 01/05/2021 01/27/2021 Nivia Baijnath Temecula Towne PI -Temporary Approved
Temecula, CA 92591 Center Assoc. Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Smile Bus TUP: a minor Temporary Use Permit to allow a mobile bus to provide
3D mouth scanning services on customers inside and produce aligners off -site. The event date will be from
January 30 through January 31, 2021 and the bus will be parked across the Promenade Mall's main entrance
at 40820 Winchester Road.
PA21-0025 40136 Village Rd, Unit 1821 916-560-001 Jaime Cardenas 01/06/2021 01/12/2021 Jennifer French PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation
Case Title / Description: Jaec Consulting, Inc.: a home occupation business license for bookkeeping and
accounting services.
Page 1 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type
Status
PA21-0027 43655 Corte Cabral 955-122-060 Jaime Cardenas 01/07/2021 01/12/2021 Joshua Brinkman
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: MR. Cool Guy HVAC: a home occupation business license for HVAC service and
repair services.
PA21-0029 31805 Temecula Pky. 735 961-080-011 Jaime Cardenas 01/07/2021 01/12/2021 Tony Sanchez
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Premier Pool Service: a home occupation business license for swimming pool
cleaning and repair services.
PA21-0030 39935 Sweetbriar Cir Jaime Cardenas 01/07/2021 01/12/2021 Abelardo
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591 Vasquez
Occupation
Case Title / Description: A Vasquez Construction: a home occupation business license for general
contracting services
PA21-0033 29500 Mira Loma Dr. N103 944-060-005 Jaime Cardenas 01/07/2021 01/12/2021 Vanda Kingsbury
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Blooms by Vanda: a home occupation business license to conduct florist services.
PA21-0038 964-640-009 Scott Cooper 01/08/2021 01/14/2021 Trent Heiner
WOODSIDE 05S PL Modifications
Approved
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend Entry Monument Landscaping: A Modification for the review of
landscaping Associated with the entry monuments located on the north and south side of Sommers Bend
(North Loop) and Sommers Bend (South Loop)
PA21-0039 31805 Temecula Pky. 961-080-011 Eric Jones 01/08/2021 Kuho Yeo Ureca
GALILEO VAIL
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592 Construction co
RANCH LP
Case Title / Description: Hana Sushi Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification
(Planning Review Only) to allow a restaurant to construct a patio for outdoor dining. The project is located at
31805 Temecula Parkway.
PA21-0047 27711 Diaz Rd 921-030-002 Eric Jones 01/11/2021 Tarek Shaer
RBI TEMECULA
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
PROP
Case Title / Description: Diaz Road Distribution Center Minor Modification: A Minor Modification to allow
architectural and site plan revisions for an existing developed site located at 27711 Diaz Road.
PA21-0048 40531 Margarita Rd 910-470-029 Eric Jones 01/11/2021 Patrick Salcedo
NUMBER 2 PC
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Chick-Fil-A Modification Application: A Major Modification application to allow an
existing fast food restaurant to reconfigure the existing drive-thru and add square footage. The project is
located at 40531 Margarita Road.
Page 2 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA21-0057 40969 Julo Way 957-591-010 Jaime Cardenas 01/13/2021 01/20/2021 Betty Balo PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation
Case Title / Description: BB3 Tax Services: a home occupation business license for tax preparation
services.
PA21-0059 39885 Jeffrey Heights Rd 957-120-018 Jaime Cardenas 01/13/2021 01/20/2021 Lauren Correia PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation
Case Title / Description: White Rabbit Engraving Company: a home occupation business for personal
engraving services.
PA21-0062 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-020 Jaime Cardenas 01/12/2021 Rachel Bruin RANCHO
Temecula, CA 92592 BAPTIST
CHURCH
Case Title / Description: 29775 Santiago T-Mobile Wireless MOD: a modification application existing
wireless facility to remove three (3) antennas, three (3) TTAs, and six (6) coax cables and install three (3)
antennas, three (3) radios, two (2) basebands, one (1) power booster, and one (1) hybrid cable to the existing
T-Mobile wireless facility located at 29775 Santiago Road.
PA21-0063 27363 Via Industria 909-325-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/14/2021 Steffen Sommers
Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: 27363 Via Industria MOD: a modification application to change the storefront
fenestration from window into a glass entry door for the industrial building located at 27363 Via Industria.
PL Wireless Plan Review
Antenna Facility
Temecula PL Modifications Plan Review
Corporate Center
PA21-0064 44260Apis Rd 960-020-026 Eric Jones 01/14/2021 01/22/2021 Rick Alnagar Naythan PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92592 Properties LLC
Case Title / Description: Redhawk Carwash Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor
Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow for architectural revisions to a previously approved auto detailing
structure at an existing gas station. The project is located at 44260 Apis Road.
PA21-0065 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Eric Jones 01/14/2021 Dino Romeo
Temecula, CA 92592
Case Title / Description: AT&T Wireless Telecommunication Facility: A Wireless Telecommunication Facility
application to allow for a new cellular facility to be co -located on an existing tower. The project is located at
29775 Santiago Road.
RANCHO PL Wireless Void
BAPTIST Antenna Facility
CHURCH
Page 3 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA21-0066 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Eric Jones 01/14/2021 Dino Romeo RANCHO PL Wireless Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592 BAPTIST Antenna Facility
CHURCH
Case Title / Description: AT&T Wireless Telecommunication Facility: A Wireless Telecommunication Facility
application to allow for a new cellular facility to be co -located on an existing tower. The project is located at
29775 Santiago Road.
PA21-0067 42375 Remington Ave 909-370-036 Jaime Cardenas 01/15/2021 Jeff Miller
5670 PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECULA
Case Title / Description: Scott's Shade Structure MOD: a modification application to construct an attached
20'x94' patio at the rear of the existing Scott's building located at 42375 Remington Avenue.
PA21-0074 42375 Remington Ave 909-370-036 Jaime Cardenas 01/19/2021 Tony Dixon
5670 PL Modifications Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECULA
Case Title / Description: Scott's Pellet Silo MOD: a modification application to install 2 new silos containing
pellets for the Scott's building located at 42375 Remington Avenue.
PA21-0075 41480 Sanborn Ave 910-272-008 Scott Cooper 01/19/2021 Emer Maulion
Hoff Investments PL Development Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Plan
Case Title / Description: Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station DP: A Development Plan for an approximately
10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant,
and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Ave.
PA21-0076 41480 Sanborn Ave 910-272-008 Scott Cooper 01/19/2021 Emer Maulion
Hoff Investments PL Conditional Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Use Permit
Case Title / Description: Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station CUP: A Conditional Use Permit for an
approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service
restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Ave.
PA21-0077 39674 Foxtail Dr 964-640-019 Scott Cooper 01/19/2021 01/20/2021 Mike Jagels
WOODSIDE 05S PL Minor Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Exception
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA31B Lot 44 ME: A Minor Exception for Lot 44 to reduce the
allowable rear yard setback by 4% from 15-0" to 14'-6" within Planning Area 31 B of Sommers Bend
PA21-0081 31280 Calle Felicidad 919-240-005 Jaime Cardenas 01/19/2021 01/20/2021 Marissa Torres
PL Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: M.T. Baking Delights: a home occupation business license for sales of baked
goods.
Page 4 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type
Status
PA21-0085 31590 Champions Cir 953-591-012 Jaime Cardenas 01/19/2021 01/20/2021 Jesselyn Torlak
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Independent Solar Consultants LLC: a home occupation business license for solar
installation systems consulting services.
PA21-0086 39904 North General Kearny 919-481-006 Jaime Cardenas 01/20/2021 01/29/2021 Christopher
PL Home
Approved
Rd Fields
Occupation
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Christopher Fields: a home occupation business license for telemarketing
services.
PA21-0098 42063Avenida Vista Ladera 921-631-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/21/2021 01/29/2021 Frank Gavit
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: LM Hurley & Associates: a home occupation business license for executive
recruiting services.
PA21-0100 40165 Paseo Sereno 919-140-008 Jaime Cardenas 01/21/2021
KENNETH
PLAccessory
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
MURPHY
Dwelling Unit
Case Title / Description: Murphy ADU: an accessory dwelling unit application to add a 985 square foot ADU
to the second floor of the existing home located at 40165 Paseo Sereno.
PA21-0103 32383 Corte Parado 954-392-013 Jaime Cardenas 01/21/2021 01/29/2021 Mia Kalfus
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Temecula's Little Bread Company: a home occupation business license for the
sale of baked goods.
PA21-0105 909-290-005 Jaime Cardenas 01/21/2021 Carolina Paz
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: Mountainview Building 4 DP: MS Mountain View Building 4 DP: a Development
Plan application to construct a 33,636 square foot building on APNs 909-290-006, -007.
PA21-0107 39761 Rustic Glen Dr 920-035-008 Jaime Cardenas 01/21/2021 01/29/2021 Anil Dwivedi
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Star Team Worx: a home occupation business license to provide staffing services.
PA21-0109 42329 Via Consuelo 918-291-004 Scott Cooper 01/21/2021 01/25/2021 Bobby Ignacio
PI -Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: DiamondKingLLC: A Home Occupation Business License for a building contractor
business.
Page 5 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant
Company Owner
Plan Type Status
PA21-0111 39653 Foxtail Dr 964-640-019 Scott Cooper 01/22/2021 01/26/2021 Candice Fenton
WOODSIDE 05S PL Modifications Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA31 B PPP MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to
modify the previously approved Product Placement Plan to change the building plotting on lots 12, 20, 22, 23,
42, 42, &44 within Planning Area 31 B of Sommers Bend
PA21-0114 43378 Calle Carabana 955-264-015 Scott Cooper 01/22/2021 01/25/2021 Robert Milioto
PI -Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Vivid Running - A Home Occupation Business License for health and wellness
coaching services.
PA21-0119 30492Avenida Estrada 919-161-006 Jaime Cardenas 01/22/2021 01/29/2021 Jenelle Baily
PI -Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Baily Language School: a home occupation business license for reading and
language tutoring services.
PA21-0124 31839 Via Saltio 961-213-003 Scott Cooper 01/23/2021 01/25/2021 Jonathan Peters
PI -Home Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: JP Fix It -A Home Occupation Business License for handyman services
PA21-0125 909-290-055 Eric Jones 01/25/2021 Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View Building 9 Development Plan: A Development Plan to allow for
the construction of an approximately 19,919 square foot industrial building located approximately 1,000 feet
west of the Avenida Alvarado and Tierra Vista Way intersection.
PA21-0127 909-290-007 Jaime Cardenas 01/26/2021 Carolina Paz
RidgeView
PL Development Cancelled
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View Building 4 DP: a Development Plan application to construct a
33,636 square foot building on APNs 909-290-006, -007. Application Cancelled, see PA21-0105.
PA21-0128 916-400-039 Scott Cooper 01/26/2021 Harveston SAB
Harveston SAB
PL Modifications Plan Review
North
North
Case Title / Description: Winchester Hills DA Amendment #2: A Second Amendment to the Development
Agreement between the City of Temecula and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to
rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the
Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within Planning Area 12 of the Harveston
Specific Plan.
Page 6 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company
Owner
Plan Type
Status
PA21-0129 43040 Beamer Ct 955-551-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/26/2021 01/29/2021 Colette Murphy
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Colette Marie Murphy: a home occupation business license for freelance writing,
editing, and educational services.
PA21-0131 30802 Terrace View Cir 957-531-026 Eric Jones 01/28/2021 Rachel Trares
ANDREW
PL Modifications
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
MAMMANO
Case Title / Description: Terrace View Room Addition: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow
for an approximately 190 square foot room addition to the second floor of an existing single-family residential
unit. The project is located at 30802 Terrace View Circle.
PA21-0132 909-290-056 Eric Jones 01/28/2021 Mario Calvillo
RidgeView
PL Development
Plan Review
Business Park
Plan
Dev
Case Title / Description: Mountain View Building 8 Development Plan: A Development Plan to allow for the
construction of an approximately 17,329 square foot industrial building generally located approximately 1,500
feet west of the Avenida Alvarado and Tierra Alta Way.
PA21-0133 33307 Decada St 962-323-028 Jaime Cardenas 01/28/2021 01/29/2021 Mary Drummond
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Deals on Wheels Auto Sales: a home occupation business license for wholesale
auto sales.
PA21-0135 43636 Savona St 959-281-045 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021 01/29/2021 Leisha
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592 Duquesnel
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Barn Tree Marketplace: a home occupation business license to sell homemade
crafts and antiques online and at farmer's markets.
PA21-0136 33079 Puffin St 962-430-013 01/29/2021 Heather Ann
PL Home
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92592 Ramaha
Occupation
Case Title / Description: Healthy Acupuncture - a home occupation business license for acupuncture and
other treatments.
PA21-0139 27725 Jefferson Ave, 106 921-400-031 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021 Shu Wei Collier
Jefferson Capital
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Blue Water Massage: a Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) application renewal
for Blue Water Massage located at 27725 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 106.
PA21-0141 28165 Jefferson Ave, C 921-060-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021 Liefu Sun
Paul Ryan
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Tang Yun Asian Spa MEP: a new Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) for Tang
Yun Asian Spa (formerly Luxury Asian Spa) located at 28165 Jefferson Avenue, Suite C.
Page 7 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status
PA21-0142 27365 Jefferson Ave 909-270-047 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021 Xiaoling Hu JEFFERSON PL Massage Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590 AVENUE Permits
TEMECULA
Case Title / Description: Oasis Spa Massage MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) renewal for
Oasis Spa Massage located at 27365 Jefferson Avenue, Suite K.
PA21-0143 27715 Jefferson Ave 921-400-024 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021 Yunjue Guo
Jefferson Capital
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92590
Permits
Case Title / Description: Moon Bay Spa MEP: a Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) renewal for Moon
Bay Spa located at 27715 Jefferson Avenue, Suite 108.
PA21-0144 40665 Winchester Rd 910-290-006 Jaime Cardenas 01/29/2021
Winchester
PL Massage
Plan Review
Temecula, CA 92591
Marketplace
Permits
Case Title / Description: Massage Green Temecula: a Massage Establishment Permit (MEP) application for
Massage Green Spa located at 40665 Winchester Road.
PA21-0146 31958 Calle Elenita 957-580-006 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2021 02/01/2021 Omar Rodriguez
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92591
Occupation
Case Title / Description: OHMARLIN, INC.: a home occupation business license for professional
management services.
PA21-0149 45380 Escalante Ct 918-382-002 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2021 02/01/2021 George Shunk
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: G's Window Tinting: a home occupation business license for mobile window tinting
services.
PA21-0155 43976 Quiet Meadow Rd 944-031-020 Jaime Cardenas 01/31/2021 02/01/2021 James Germain
PL Home
Approved
Temecula, CA 92592
Occupation
Case Title / Description: JAG Handyman Services: a home occupation business license for handyman
services.
PREAPP21-0 921-280-002 Eric Jones 01/05/2021 01/26/2021 Omar Khoja
Ridge Park Point
PL
Completed
022
Pre -Application
Case Title / Description: The Learning Experience Pre -Application: A pre -application to review a proposed
Development Plan for an approximately 9,990 square foot learning center located approximately 600 feet west
of the Rancho California and Jefferson Avenue intersection.
PREAPP21-0 955-050-016 Jaime Cardenas 01/11/2021 02/01/2021 Kent Cornwall
Corp of Pres
PL
Completed
045
Bish Ch of Jesus
Pre -Application
Christ LDS
Case Title / Description: LDS Church Shade Structure: a pre -application to review a proposed 1800
square -foot shade structure at the vacant lot with APN 955-050-016.
Page 8 of 9
Assigned Planner Approval
PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant
Company Owner Plan Type Status
PREAPP21-0 28780 Single Oak Dr 921-020-050 Jaime Cardenas 01/15/2021 02/01/2021 John Alvarado
068 Temecula, CA 92590
Case Title / Description: Temecula Hills Christian Fellowship Pre-App: a pre -application to review the
proposed tenant improvements for a proposed church within the existing building located at 28780 Single Oak
Drive, Suite 130 and 140.
SINGLE OAK PL Completed
DEV Pre -Application
Page 9 of 9
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: John Crater, Division Chief
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report
PREPARED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Report
Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant
That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly
„�. City of Temecula Fire Department
Temecula Fire Department Service Calls Incident Type
January 2021 Commercial Fire 4
of T Ems,
ti� • w oa
• rr - -
6vc: Plies*
e 1 . w gg. •
— Sid •- � • • • •• ` .��Ks�-��- n�`n ,
• -
.� 1989 -. ...0.0
�
•� • 4b •
�'a"� :� •IJ” �', •, .a ►� • +,••. • . 4USA VALLEY
rG
�t '� �;� Jr '� a �; x• • ~ • -
• • R. •_
{ ~P[[IIRNGACA;[N CI R}iD RV
/� �"+L!t Cf'~• �. scaly �'�■ �-- - / / f/%
Rcfsai
False Alarms
Haz Mat
Medical
Other Fire
Other Misc
M Public Assist
Res Fire
Rescue
imp
Ringing Alarm
Standby
Traffic Collision
Wildland Fire
57
1
606
6
13
24
0
0
4
9 I
58 �
Total 783
,�yCty of Temecula cwv
Temecula FireoeFire� Department
COUHrp
t
�a
Plan Review and Inspections
January 2021
Plan Review and Inspections January Year to Date
Plan Review 309 309
Construction Inspections 225 255
Annual Inspections 670 670
Counter/Public Inquiries 0 0
I
�yCty of Temecula Fire Department
of TtNF, Introduction of Temecula's New
989mv„€
COUHTp
y
Battalion Chief Dan Olson
0
Item No. 12
Item No. 13
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (January 2021)
PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file.
The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of
January 2021.
PATROL SERVICES
Overall calls for police service 6,613
"Priority One" calls for service 56
Average response time for "Priority One" calls 6.16
VOLUNTEERS
Chaplain
6
Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours
206
Reserve officer hours (patrol)
13
Explorer
0
Station/Administration
33
Total Volunteer hours
285
CRIME PREVENTION
Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings 3
Safety presentations/Training 0
Special events 1
Residential/Business security surveys conducted 0
Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0
Station Tours 0
Planning Review Projects 6
Temp Outdoor Use Permits 3
OLD TOWN STOREFRONT
Total customers served
200
Fingerprints/Live Scans
86
Police reports filed
0
Citations signed off
12
Total receipts
$2,418
SPECIAL TEAMS (PROBLEM ORIENTED POLICING)
On sight felony arrests
13
On sight misdemeanor arrests
26
Felony arrest warrants served
11
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
18
Follow-up investigations
4
Parole/Probation Searches
0
Pedestrian Checks
20
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks
35
Crime Free Housing Checks
0
SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM)
On sight felony arrests 3
On sight misdemeanor arrests 24
Felony arrest warrants served 5
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 25
Area Checks 114
Camp Checks 45
Pedestrian Checks 87
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks... 49
Outreach attempts / Success... 13 / 6
SPECIAL TEAMS (SPECIAL ENFORCEMENT TEAM)
On sight felony arrests
3
On sight misdemeanor arrests
14
Felony arrest warrants served
2
Misdemeanor arrest warrants served
14
Follow-up investigations
4
Parole/Probation Searches
1
Pedestrian Checks
25
Traffic StopsNehicle Checks...
30
Marijuana Dispensary Checks
0
SPECIAL TEAMS (Burglary Suppression Team)
Felony arrests
4
Felony filings
3
Total Cases Assigned
25
Total Cases Closed
27
Search Warrants prepared/served
3
TRAFFIC
Citations issued for hazardous violations
745
Non -hazardous citations
144
Parking citations
76
Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations
49
Seatbelts
4
Cell Phone Cites
62
Injury collisions
21
D.U.I. Arrests
35
Grant funded D.U.I. / Traffic safety checkpoints
0
Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0
INVESTIGATIONS
Beginning Caseload
125
Total Cases Assigned
29
Total Cases Closed
38
Search Warrants prepared/served
19
Arrests
4
Out of Custody Filings
2
PROMENADE MALL TEAM
Calls for service 62
Felony arrest/filings 3
Misdemeanor arrest/filings 15
Traffic Citations 0
Fingerprints/Live Scans 83
Total receipts $2,280
SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS
Felony arrests
0
Misdemeanor arrests
0
Reports
2
Citations
0
Meetings/Presentations
160
***No Students on Campus in January* * *
Item No. 14
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: February 23, 2021
SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report
RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for
Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report
may also be viewed on the City's website at:
hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing, PW19-15
Description: Design to 30% and environmental review of the extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz
Road, including a new low -flow crossing of Murrieta Creek.
Cost: $2,387,000
Status: Kickoff January 2021. Design and environmental are expected to last 24 months.
Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25
Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry
Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to
create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases.
Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase
2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road.
Cost: $4,566,513
Status: Phase 1 design and Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities
include Consultant preparation of 60% plans, and several engineering and environmental studies.
French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01
Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the
Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction
with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215.
Cost: $137,356,246
Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
CIRCULATION PROJECTS
1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02
Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula
Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp.
Cost: $7,776,725
Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities include roadway
design, structures design, noise study work program, drainage studies, air quality conformity determination,
design standard decision document, and historical resources compliance report.
Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08
Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route
79 South.
Cost: $52,025,657
Status: City accepted the project as complete on June 30, 2020 and filed the Notice of Completion. Caltrans
accepted the project as complete on September 1, 2020. In accordance with the 3-year Landscape
Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020
through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-
of-way to the State inventory.
Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05
Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road
and Winchester Road.
Cost: $14,307,394
Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council
approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary
Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA
provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. CEQA approval is anticipated in Q2 2021. Type
Selection Report submitted to Caltrans on July 9, 2020. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance
HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years.
oil
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11
Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two
lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights and installation of
the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue.
Cost: $1,340,400
Status: Design is at 30%.
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County
Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01
Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive
loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits.
Cost: $1,105,000
Status: Bids were opened on Tuesday, December 22, 2020. Project is being scheduled to award to Contractor.
Construction is scheduled to start in early Spring 2021.
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17
Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del
Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta
Creek to Jefferson Avenue.
Cost: $1,900,000
Status: Construction start date is March 1, 2021.
Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW19-08
Description: Rehabilitation of Butterfield Stage Road, south of Rancho California Road to De Portola Road and Pauba
Road, from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road.
Cost: $4,320,000
Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021.
3
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19
Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive.
Cost: $346,646.50
Status: Project is currently in design.
Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11
Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project
also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from
Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane.
Cost: $1,347,674
Status: The project is currently wrapping up the design phase. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021.
Ynez Road Improvements, PW17-17
Description This project includes widening Ynez Road, from Rancho Vista Road to La Paz Street, to two lanes in each
direction, and the completion of missing segments of curb & gutter, sidewalk, landscape medians,
streetlights and modification of the traffic signal at Santiago Road.
Cost: $4,571,766
Status: Design is at 60%. This project is currently on hold.
M
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS
Citywide — Concrete Repairs, PW20-10
Description: Remove and replace concrete improvements including, but not limited to curb & gutter, sidewalk, ADA
access ramp, commercial drive approach, cross gutter, and curb outlet top of structure.
Cost: $157,789
Status: Bids opened on November 12, 2020. Construction contract award to IE Engineering is pending.
Citywide Streetlight Acquisition and Light Emitting Diode (LED) Retrofit, PW17-18
Description: Effective November 12, 2019, the City assumed ownership, and operations and maintenance of 7,279
streetlights located within the City limits. The Light Emitting Diode (LED) lighting system retrofit and the
installation of a wireless lighting control node system for all streetlights Citywide has also been completed.
Applications for energy rebates from SCE for the conversion to LED lighting fixtures are currently being
processed and the City is due to receive approximately $640,000.
Cost: $8,003,311
Status: The purchase and acquisition, and LED retrofit of arterial and residential streetlights is complete. The SCE
rebate for the LED retrofit is anticipated to be received in February 2021.
Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07
Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation
Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to
accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety
features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing
office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen
equipment.
Cost: $5,000,000
Status: Planning phase and assessment of existing building is complete. Phase 1 needs design initiated.
5
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19
Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula
Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe.
Cost: $4,427,350
Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — June 2021. Environmental revalidation completed
October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, Design Engineering Evaluation Report, Project
Specific Maintenance Agreement, Landscape Maintenance Agreement, Transportation Art / Community ID
Proposal, and Copyright and Waiver of Moral Rights in Artwork.
Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21
Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool
Cost: $6,760,000
Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020
to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. Evaluation
team is negotiating the scope and fee with the highest ranking firm. Contract award is anticipated in March
2021.
Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04
Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to
the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15
and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta
Creek trail.
Cost: $6,288,595
Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative
Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. Currently processing application for
Caltrans Streamlined Oversite and Encroachment Permit/Plan Check with Riverside County Flood Control
(RCFC). CTC approved construction funding for the project on June 25, 2020. The project was advertised
for construction bids with a closing date of December 3, 2020. Due to various irregularities with the bids
received, staff and the City Attorney's Office, decided to reject all bids and re -advertise. The project is
currently out to bid. The bid opening date is February 18, 2021. The contract award is anticipated to be in
March of 2021.
X
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04
Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at
Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide
a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location.
Cost: $2,716,764
Status: The project is in design. Reviewed 60% plans. 100% PSE expected June 2021.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Third Street), PW17-24
Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side of Third Street, between Old Town Front Street and
Mercedes Street and the west side of Mercedes Street from Third Street for approximately 150' to the north.
Portion adjacent to the proposed parking structure for the hotel will be completed by private developer.
Cost: To be determined
Status: This project has been shelved.
Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28
Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road.
Cost: $198,920
Status: Project is currently in design.
Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18
Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive.
Cost: $442,077
Status: Project is currently in design.
7
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued)
Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20
Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road.
Cost: $467,403
Status: Project is currently in design.
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS
Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10
Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and
fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site.
Cost: $1,280,284
Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Geotechnical investigation for design alternatives
performed in mid -August 2019. Geotechnical report received October 1, 2019. Redesign started in
February of 2020. CEQA to be completed in March of 2021. Plans are 60% complete. Construction is
expected to begin in September of 2021.
Mini Pump Track, PW 20-09
Description: Construction of Mini Pump Track at Ronald Reagan Sports Park to complement existing track and
accommodate newer riders.
Cost: $95,000
Status: Contractor was issued a $60,000.00 construction contract which does not require a formal bid. Contractor
began construction on December 7, 2020. Contractor completed construction on December 16, 2020. City
staff along with a separate maintenance contractor completed final site preparation on December 17, 2020.
Project is complete and was opened to the public on December 18, 2020.
Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06
Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball
Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch
Park.
Cost: $1,127,800
Status: Project is currently in design.
9
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued)
Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing
Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and
federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks.
Cost: $5,157,649
Status: Playground renovations & replacements planned for FY20/21 include Sam Hicks, John Magee, Stephen
Michael Linen, and Winchester Creek Parks. Sam Hicks, John Magee projects completed. Stephen Linen
and Winchester Creek Park projects completing in February.
Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03
Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also
includes renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case.
Cost: $1,120,000
Status: Project is currently in design.
Sports Court Resurfacing
Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts,
basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks.
Cost: $50,000
Status: Court re -surfacing completed in January at Margarita Community Park hockey rink. Project cost $13,900.
Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion
Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports
parks.
Cost: $222,546.70
Status: Musco LED retrofit lighting for Ronald Reagan Sports Park Upper Soccer Fields installation scheduled for
November 2020. Project cost $136,260.00. Currently seeking proposals for LED retrofit installation at
tennis/pickleball courts and hockey rinks.
10
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS
Hilton Garden Inn
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room
Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately
north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division.
Mexico Cafe
Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square
foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection.
Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road)
Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development.
Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division. Project is being phased at this time. Construction of Friendship Park (formerly known as Pala
Park) has begun as of January 11, 2021. It is anticipated the development will reach 25% occupancy by
Spring of 2021.
Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch)
Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community
Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm
Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan.
Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with
streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in
three tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction.
Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Models are open. Production
homes are under construction.
11
City of Temecula
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
PROJECT STATUS REPORT
February 23, 2021
LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued)
Staybridge Suites
Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel
located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue.
Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development
division.
Temecula Village
Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of
Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive.
Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division.
Traffic signal has been installed at Via Portofino.
12
ELECTRONIC COMMENTS
SUBMITTED FOR THE
RECORD
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:51 AM
To:
Subject: RE:open
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
ro i*.e+t of Scathrn
W,M Country
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent:Saturday, February 13, 20217:33 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: open
This has gone on long enough. Open city hall and get back to business. This is ridicules.
Joni Beckman
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:51 AM
To: Belinda Morris
Subject: RE:Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula,along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Original Message
From: Belinda Morris<
Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:51 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:Temecula
To whom this may concern, we the people, United States of America.Temecula can and needs to be a beacon of light.
We need to lead the way for protecting our God given rights and rights given to us by the blood of our brothers and
sisters of this great country. We need to stand and demonstrate the strength of courage to go forward, to rebuild our
communities, our churches, our children.Children, our most precious asset,are being taught to stand down, even
though "the science" doesn't support the closure of schools. Plain and simple open our schools. I will volunteer my
time to assist in anyway, I will be a substitute teacher, I will complete my education to become a teacher. I am 62 years
old and this is unexceptionable what we are doing to our children and parents struggling at this time.We don't want to
depend on government,we want to stand on our own two feet, standing tall and strong, chin held high(looking to God)
as we go forward.Very simple
OPEN OUR SCHOOLS!!! I've got your back.
Sincerely Belinda Morris,One ferocious grandmother. I say this not for my grandchildren for they are homeschooled,
hallelujah. I say this for the ones that need representation at the very troubling time.
Sent from my iPhone
i
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 11:11 AM
To:
Subject: FW: Public Comments at City Council Meeting 2/23/21
Attachments: Temecula City Council Address-PDF.pdf
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD,MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl a(..temeculaca.Qov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
'v 4ut of Southern C..forn..
W .Country
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Craig Evans<
Sent:Thursday, February 18, 2021 5:12 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comments at City Council Meeting 2/23/21
Hi City Clerk,
Below are my comments I would like read at the February 23, 2021 City Council Meeting. I have timed the reading and at
a moderate pace it was 2min, 55 sec in length. Please let me know if your reading would be over the 3 min time limit
and I will shorten to fit. I have also attached the reading as a PDF document for your convenience.
Thank you,
Craig Evans, 951-699-5799
Temecula Valley Neighbors Organized to Influence Sky Environment
www.TVNOISE.org
Good evening Honorable Mayor and City Council members. My name is Craig Evans. I'm a 33-
year resident of the City of Temecula, living in the 4thDistrict. Late last year I formed a citizens
group to address the increasing air traffic over our homes coming from the French Valley
Airport. The group known as TVNOISE.org, (Temecula ValleyNeighbors Organized
to Influence Sky Environment), consists of over 200 neighbors from the Temecula Valley area
with over 100 residents from the City of Temecula. The goal is to help identify solutions to the
growing impact of aircraft noise attributed to operations at the French Valley Airport.
These solutions are based on nationally recognized, voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures to
be followed by pilots and aircraft using the airport. These procedures, also known as Fly
Quiet, Fly Friendly or Good Neighbor programs, are not FAA mandated or regulated. Rather
they are voluntary flight procedures designed and agreed upon by the stakeholders, which
include local citizens, the City of Temecula, City of Murrieta, Riverside County, the Airport,
pilots, airport tenants, and the FAA.
These voluntary procedures often include re-evaluating flight patterns around the airport to
avoid flying over residential neighborhoods, flight pattern elevations, concentrating flights
over already high ambient noise corridors, etc. Airports all over the nation have adopted
robust and effective voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures. Local airports include Corona,
Carlsbad, Santa Monica, Van Nuys, Hawthorne, La Vern, and many, many more. Although
the French Valley airport does have Noise Abatement Procedures, they are lacking, outdated,
unenforced, ignored by pilots, and not meeting current national trends.
90% of French Valley air traffic flies over the City of Temecula. When stakeholders make
future Noise Abatement Procedures decisions, the city must be at the table to protect its
interests and insure the superior quality of life for its residents.
On behalf of the hundreds of citizens negatively affected by French Valley Airport operations,
TVNOISE is asking the City of Temecula to be a major stakeholder in the discussions and act
as catalyst to bring the other stakeholders together. A recent conversation with Luke Watson
and Brandon Rabidou was very productive in introducing the issues and potential solutions
to the city administrators. The City has the power and influence to bring all the stakeholders
to the table to make positive changes. We need your help.
Noise abatement takes dedication, patience, the desire to collaborate and willingness to compromise in
an effort to find solutions to this issue.These initial steps and the willingness of the City of Temecula to
support the effort can serve as a catalyst for future progress toward a more positive quality of life for the
citizens of Temecula. Thank you for your consideration and please visit our website at TVNOISE.org
2
Temecula City Council Address
By Craig Evans
2/23/21
Good evening Honorable Mayor and City Council members. My name is Craig Evans. I'm a 33-year
resident of the City of Temecula,living in the 4th District. Late last year I formed a citizens group to
address the increasing air traffic over our homes coming from the French Valley Airport.The group
known as TVNOISE.org, (Temecula Valley Neighbors Organized to Influence Sky Environment),consists
of over 200 neighbors from the Temecula Valley area with over 100 residents from the City of Temecula.
The goal is to help identify solutions to the growing impact of aircraft noise attributed to operations at
the French Valley Airport.
These solutions are based on nationally recognized,voluntary Noise Abatement Procedures to be followed
by pilots and aircraft using the airport.These procedures,also known as Fly Quiet,Fly Friendly or Good
Neighbor programs,are not FAA mandated or regulated. Rather they are voluntary flight procedures
designed and agreed upon by the stakeholders,which include local citizens,the City of Temecula, City of
Murrieta, Riverside County,the Airport,pilots,airport tenants,and the FAA.
These voluntary procedures often include re-evaluating flight patterns around the airport to avoid flying
over residential neighborhoods, flight pattern elevations, concentrating flights over already high ambient
noise corridors,etc.Airports all over the nation have adopted robust and effective voluntary Noise
Abatement Procedures. Local airports include Corona,Carlsbad,Santa Monica,Van Nuys, Hawthorne, La
Vern,and many, many more.Although the French Valley airport does have Noise Abatement Procedures,
they are lacking,outdated,unenforced,ignored by pilots,and not meeting current national trends.
90% of French Valley air traffic flies over the City of Temecula. When stakeholders make future Noise
Abatement Procedures decisions,the city must be at the table to protect its interests and insure the
superior quality of life for its residents.
On behalf of the hundreds of citizens negatively affected by French Valley Airport operations,TVNOISE is
asking the City of Temecula to be a major stakeholder in the discussions and act as catalyst to bring the
other stakeholders together.A recent conversation with Luke Watson and Brandon Rabidou was very
productive in introducing the issues and potential solutions to the city administrators.The City has the
power and influence to bring all the stakeholders to the table to make positive changes.We need your
help.
Noise abatement takes dedication,patience,the desire to collaborate and willingness to compromise in
an effort to find solutions to this issue. These initial steps and the willingness of the City of Temecula to
support the effort can serve as a catalyst for future progress toward a more positive quality of life for the
citizens of Temecula.Thank you for your consideration and please visit our website at TVNOISE.org
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 11:07 AM
To:
Subject: RE: Public Comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a..temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
". k..arn of Southrn Ca.fornw
W.ne Country
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: M. Bourbonnais<
Sent: Friday, February 19,2021 9:39 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
To be read into the record during the February 23, 2021 council meeting:
Dear Council Members,
I am excited that attainable home ownership will be on the agenda for the March 9, 2021 council meeting. As you may
know,the housing crisis has become part of the national conversation. California state senator Scott Weiner recently
introduced legislation to provide powerful tools to local government to tackle the housing crisis, and major news outlets
like the New York Times have published articles about anti-housing policies being at the heart of the crisis.The point is,
Temecula will not be served by more of the same.
During the February 9th council meeting, the City Manager stated that the affordable housing presentation will be on
the March 9th agenda,as well as information about the Housing Element and what is currently in the pipeline.With all
due respect, this is more of the same.An animated presentation is informative but serves no practical purpose toward a
solution. It is incumbent upon you to think outside the box and consider new ideas.
The Brown Act prohibits Council members from discussing non agenda items.This means it is critically important that
the March 9, 2021 agenda include the following topics: Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations,an inclusionary
housing ordinance,and Lamont's attainable home ownership proposal.
During the February 9th meeting,the City Manager acknowledged the numerous speakers who submitted public
comments and said that he wants speakers to know they've been heard. We appreciate the acknowledgment and
respectfully request that Council, in an act of good faith,follow through on this sentiment and place the aforementioned
items on the March 9, 2021 agenda.
1
Thank you,
Melissa Bourbonnais
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:47 AM
To: Upward Community
Subject: RE: Public Comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohlc temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
la"
C ate S
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Upward Community<hello@upwardcommunity.org>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 8:44 AM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
To be read into the record during the February 23, 2021 council meeting:
Dear Council Members,
Like my colleagues, I am excited that attainable home ownership will be on the agenda for the March 9, 2021 council
meeting.As you may know,the housing crisis has become part of the national conversation. California state senator
Scott Weiner recently introduced legislation to provide powerful tools to local governments to tackle the housing crisis,
and major news outlets like the New York Times have published articles about anti-housing policies being at the heart of
the crisis.The point is,Temecula will not be served by more of the same.
The City needs to think outside the box and consider new ideas; however,the Brown Act prohibits council members
from discussing any non agenda item. This means it is critically important that the March 9, 2021 agenda include the
following topics: Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations, an inclusionary housing ordinance, and Lamont's
attainable home ownership proposal.
During the February 9th meeting,the City Manager acknowledged the numerous speakers who submitted public
comments and said that he wants speakers to know they've been heard. We appreciate the acknowledgement and
respectfully request that Council, in an act of good faith, follow through on this sentiment and place the aforementioned
items on the March 9, 2021 agenda.
Thank you,
Jonnie Estes
www.upwardcommunity.org
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:40 AM
To: Tammy Acme
Subject: RE: For Feb 23rd City Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohle.temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula,CA 92590
cates
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Tammy Acme <
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:36 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: For Feb 23rd City Council Meeting
To the Temecula City Council,
Since you are a new group for 2021, I would like to see you think outside the box and consider some new ideas.
The Brown Act is often used as an excuse for why City Council members refuse to discuss non agenda items.
If the Brown Act is so restrictive, then please put the following topics on the agenda for the March 9th City Council
Meeting:
• Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations
• An inclusionary housing ordinance
• Ms. Lamont's attainable home ownership proposal
These are critical issues that need to be addressed now.
Thank you for reading my email.
Sincerely,
Tammy(Temecula Resident for 14 years)
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:33 AM
To:
Subject: RE: General Comments to the Temecula City Council 2/23/2021
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl a(�.temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
CaleS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 2:38 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc:
Subject: General Comments to the Temecula City Council 2/23/2021
General Comments to the Temecula City Council 2/23/2021
Many of our citizens don't believe that we have free and fair elections anymore. This is real voter suppression and is a
civil rights impropriety.
In order to rectify this, we, the People, are asking the Temecula City Council and any other entity that believes the same
way as the aggrieved aforementioned People to mitigate this voter crisis by suing the Riverside County Registrar of voters
to allow us to become a sanctuary county apart from the repressive voter policies imposed on the People by the State of
California.
• The lawsuit would include but not be limited to:
• Make ballot harvesting illegal again.
1
• Require that Riverside County voters provide an ID before voting that also shows citizenship
• Negate the mail-in only ballot system and return to absentee voting by request or necessity.
• Require an ID when registering to vote that proves citizenship
• Close polls by 8 PM and require all absentee ballots to be in by that time. No back-dating will be allowed such as
happened in some States during the 2020 election count.
• Allow poll watchers to view the ballot process at the polling locations and also at the Registrar of voters. This would
include standing over the employees/volunteers that determine if a ballot is good or not. This would also include watching
to make sure that potential voters provide a real ID before receiving their ballot.
• Require overhead cameras in all Registrar of Voters offices where ballots are brought in or counted that is available for
public viewing and recorded for future viewing. These videos must remain intact for 10 years; not destroyed as as
happened in many States in the 2020 election count.
• Count ballots by hand; no electronic tabulations e.g. Smartmatics, Dominion, etc
Sincerely,
Bob Kowell
President, Murrieta Temecula Republican Assembly
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:30 AM
To: karyn finley
Subject: RE:ATTAINABLE HOME OWNERSHIP
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C7e:AILI
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: karyn finley<
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 4:36 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:ATTAINABLE HOME OWNERSHIP
To be read into the record during the February 23, 2021 council meeting:
Dear Council Members,
I am excited that attainable home ownership will be on the agenda for the March 9, 2021 council meeting. As you may
know,the housing crisis has become part of the national conversation. California state senator Scott Weiner recently
introduced legislation to provide powerful tools to local government to tackle the housing crisis, and major news outlets
like the New York Times have published articles about anti-housing policies being at the heart of the crisis.The point is,
Temecula will not be served by more of the same.
During the February 9th council meeting, the City Manager stated that the affordable housing presentation will be on
the March 9th agenda, as well as information about the Housing Element and what is currently in the pipeline. With all
due respect,this is more of the same.An animated presentation is informative but serves no practical purpose toward a
solution. It is incumbent upon you to think outside the box and consider new ideas.
The Brown Act prohibits Council members from discussing non agenda items.This means it is critically important that
the March 9, 2021 agenda include the following topics: Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations, an inclusionary
housing ordinance, and Lamont's attainable home ownership proposal.
During the February 9th meeting, the City Manager acknowledged the numerous speakers who submitted public
comments and said that he wants speakers to know they've been heard. We appreciate the acknowledgment and
1
respectfully request that Council, in an act of good faith, follow through on this sentiment and place the aforementioned
items on the March 9, 2021 agenda.
Thank you,
Karyn Finley
Karyn Finley Realty® Keller Williams Frisco Stars
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:28 AM
To: Jennifer Cornelius
Subject: RE:Council Meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a�temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
131_
7.;
C
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore maybe subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Jennifer Cornelius<
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 7:51 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:Council Meeting
To be read into record February 23, 2021:
I have been a resident of Temecula since 2005. My husband owns a small business here and I have three
children in Temecula public schools.
I understand that the Brown Act prohibits council members from discussing any non-agenda item and I believe
it is critically important that the March 9, 2021 agenda include the following topics: Warehouse at Creekside
regulatory violations, an inclusionary housing ordinance and Laurel Lamont's attainable home ownership
proposal.
I believe that the people that work here deserve to live here.
Thank you for your time,
Jennifer Cornelius
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:28 AM
To: Basilia M
Subject: RE: Election Integrity in Temecula
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a)temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C a n
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Basilia M <
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 8:21 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Election Integrity in Temecula
Dear Randi Johl and the City Council of Temecula,
As a citizen of the city of Temecula for over a decade, I am writing today to request that the Council represent its citizens
in the case of election integrity.
I worked at Temecula voting center this past election, saw and experienced many election compromising activities take
place. I was appalled to see the many ways the voting protocol was compromised and so vulnerable to tampering and
manipulation. Ineligible people were allowed to vote without being registered, some with business address or P.O. box
(unlawful), all without any ID or proof of citizenship (Non-citizens can vote?This should not be so).When the computer
system wouldn't allow them to be entered,an override was initiated by the supervisors, "magically"the supervisors
were able to get them in to vote after holding up the line for 30 minutes as they worked on helping these people. This
caused enormous time delays and longer lines for the valid voters. Not only was it ineligible and unlawful voting activity
it also prevented valid voters from voting.Additionally, several times systems were "down," not working, preventing
workers from processing voter which caused the lines to be long,valid registered voters had to wait and could not vote.
This caused lines that surpassed the 8:pm deadline causing people to not be able to vote having stood in line for 2 1/2
hours, sometimes more! There were not enough computers to look up registrations,which was the 1st step in being
able to bring the people to the machines to vote,electronically.This also caused long time delays.The computers and
machines were connected to the internet,this leaves all electronic votes completely vulnerable to hacking.Also, the in-
person votes counted each night, but since all the selections that voters made could be easily seen as they were being
counted they could have easily been sorted through and separated out to a particular preference. Since they were
printed on pieces of white paper, the votes with selections that were considered undesirable by a particular counter or
supervisor could be easily discarded and no one would have known nor would be able to track it. What a horrible hole in
the system. I tried to be very cognitive of the number of counted ballots,to watch them ALL be sealed and transported
to the car for delivery to the Registrar. Several nights I was told to leave by managers before ballots were secure. I
insisted on staying, one supervisor insisted I leave. Both supervisors looked nervous when I insisted on watching the
ballot number be recorded (per protocol) and sealed.The main night of the last election 11/3/2020, the bags were
sealed and then re-opened after we left (I watched through the window). When I tried to re-enter, one of the
supervisors stood in the doorway and wouldn't let me in. The same supervisor went unseen for several minutes after re-
opening the bag, then came back and re-sealed the bags. Why did the ballots bag need to be re-opened after counted,
recorded and sealed?A new tally sheet was easily replaced with the signature of the 2 supervisors working in tandem
but without any oversight of anyone else who was legally allowed to observe. The supervisors were both of the same
political persuasion, and working in concert, instead of having supervisors of different or neutral persuasions, to be able
to cross check and verify one another. One of the supervisors had NO experience whatsoever but was given a
supervisory role, but several others who had worked at many elections over many years, were given common roles. I
question the selection of the supervisors. My welcome letter listed all the workers, but not the supervisors. How does a
regulatory body such as the Registrar, not have their supervisors determined when that position requires 6 weeks of
training, and so therefore needs to be chosen, determined and begun with plenty of time prior to an election, but the
subordinate workers are already assigned a location needing only 2 hours of training and can be hired almost last
minute. As business owner and former corporate manager find this order of assignment and scheduling very odd. The
last night there I tried to confirm the ballot counts, but I was refused the information. As an election rep, it was my job
and my right (along with others), to observe, verify and ensure correct counts. How could I do that if persons in the
supervisory roles or even other poll workers refused that information?This wholly egregious to the integrity of
elections, any kind of elections. How can citizens trust that their vote counts when a great many result compromising
activities and actions has taken place? We cannot. This is NOT a trustworthy, vote-safe election system where the
citizens' vote is valued, given protection and implemented. Our country was founded on, freedom, the right to vote for
the people that represent us, and to do so with integrity, not in wrongful, unjust, fraudulent or manipulative
activity. Since there is no trust We the People, begin to question who have been passed or placed in supervisory or
governmental positions or what laws based on an erroneous, manipulative and/or intentionally devised outcomes. I am
beyond dissatisfied with what I observed happening during the last election. It is a travesty, and must not ever happen
again.
I support Bob Kowell's statements and efforts in securing election integrity in our city with some additions of my own in
red:
• Make ballot harvesting illegal again.
• Require that Riverside County voters provide an ID before voting that also shows citizenship
• Negate the mail-in only ballot system and return to absentee voting by request or necessity.
• Require an ID when registering to vote that proves citizenship.
• Do not allow P.O. Boxes and/or business addresses to be used to register to vote. Provide specific and case-by case
provision to those without a current address, for other or extenuating circumstances such as a truck driver who lives in
his/her truck or RV.
• Close polls by 8 PM and require all absentee ballots to be in by that time. No back-dating will be allowed such as
happened in some States during the 2020 election count. If using computers to identify registered voters, provide plenty
of computers and NO connectivity issues to prevent or slow lines or access preventing voters from meeting the 8:pm
deadline.
• Allow poll watchers to view the ballot process at the polling locations and also at the Registrar of voters. This would include standing
over the employees/volunteers that determine if a ballot is good or not. This includes verifying the count and that each ballot is process
equitably. This would also include watching to make sure that potential voters provide a[government issued] ID, verifying eligibility,
photo, address and signature before receiving their ballot and verifying that they have not voted more than once.
• Require overhead cameras in all Registrar of Voters offices where ballots are brought in or counted that is available for public
viewing, live in real time,and recorded for future viewing. These videos must remain intact for 10 years: be duplicated and stored in
different pre-determined locations for safety and security, in the event one set is damaged or destroyed, however would not be
destroyed as as happened in many States in the 2020 election count.
• Count ballots by hand; no electronic tabulations e.g. Smartmatics, Dominion, etc.
• Ballot counting centers,voting centers,workers,observers and supervisors, should be assigned their roles based on knowledge,
experience and honesty(as any other job)and each role, especially supervisory roles, must have equal amounts of persons in the
same position,at the same location,with opposing political affiliations to check and balance.
2
Thank you for your time and attention to this matter.
Andrea Melara
City of Temecula resident
3
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:48 AM
To: Lucille Loman
Subject: RE: Subject: Thank you for Explaining the White Flags
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(c�temeculaca.Oov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
-131
(COCI"
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Lucille Loman <
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:47 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Subject: Thank you for Explaining the White Flags
February 23, 2021 9:28 AM
Dear Randi,
It is scary how the enemy is really controlling our lives. Joe Biden and Hunter took money from China to infect us with
the pandemic.
Not to us only, but the world. The Democrats have succeeded in surrendering our lives and World War III is in order.
The American people need to be saved from the enemy Democrats, China and WHO. Why are we being targeted?
We need to proclaim indictment for Joe Biden, Kamala Harris & Nancy Pelosi. Put them in jail and throw away the key.
Easier, put all the crooked Democrats on a flat bed boat and push them out to sea and let the sharks have a picnic.
Thank you,
Lucille Loman
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:17 PM
To: cj ks 1
Subject: RE: Public comment for tonights meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a temeculaca.c ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C7;aisim's°-,.. /°-
CateS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:47 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public comment for tonights meeting
Dear City Council Members,
Is there any update to when the rec center pool facilities and city hall will get back open without these ridiculous Covid
mandates?
How is the city addressing the impending hit to their budget reserves since the tax income is down from all the small
businesses closing?
I was surprised to see the council is even considering starting their own police dept. Do we really have the funds for this
type of endeavor? Please do not think that the local small social justice warrior group speaks for the majority...they
don't.
Sincerely,
A concerned longtime Temecula resident
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:49 PM
To: Suzanne Lane
Subject: RE: Public Comment
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD,MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl a(�.temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
cafes
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Suzanne Lane<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:27 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment
Good evening,
Thank you for reading my public comment.
I would like to share my thoughts regarding the white flags at the duck pond. I'm confident that you have only the best
intentions and probably anticipated the flags being a positive presence. Unfortunately, it is not the sign of comfort and
compassion that you have hoped for. My experience when driving past, and of everyone else that I have asked on the
subject, is that the duck pond currently is one of oppression. It looks like we have surrendered to communism! Or that
the duck pond is now a giant cemetery. The flags represent death. A body count, if you will. It is a horrible reminder that
things are not as they should be. And since the flags can be placed for anyone that we know, local or not, that has died
from covid, the duck pond could soon be covered with white flags that don't even represent Temecula.
Also, this seems very insensitive. Why not flags all year, every year for those that have died in car accidents, drug
overdoses, heart attacks, suicide, the list goes on. I have a good friend whose son died last year because he was literally
too afraid to go to the hospital, due to all of the propaganda and fear mongoring that took place in our world. I do not
think that people need another reminder right now, that this is one of the darkest times in our lives. As it is, its very
depressing looking at all of the faceless people walking around with masks on that are compromising their oxygen
intake, That alone screams "something is very wrong"! People need comfort and peace and anything that feels normal
right now! Not another reminder of the "Plandemic". Every time a family drives by, they certainly should not have to
explain to their already traumatized children, what the flags stand for. Please remove the flags as soon as
possible. Perhaps leave them through the end of the month if you feel that you must have a memorial for covid. Then we
need to move on with life. I will not accept a "new normal" mentality. I refuse to believe that the current situation will
continue much longer.
Also, I feel that it would be very helpful to the people if we could call in and speak with you live during the meetings. I may
be therapeutic for folks to feel heard.
1
Thank you very much!
Suzanne Lane
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:49 PM
To: Jordan Bourbonnais
Subject: RE:city council meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
c7cates
mi--"zeiric."7----
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Jordan Bourbonnais<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:42 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:city council meeting
Dear council members,
We know the housing crisis is getting worse. The local workforce needs you to discuss new ideas. Please put
the topics related to attainable home ownership on the March 9th agenda. You know what they are
Thank you,
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:31 PM
To: Ferman, Yusur
Subject: RE:Attainable Home Ownership
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl antemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Ferman, Yusur<yferman@csu.fullerton.edu>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Melissa Bourbonnais<
Subject:Attainable Home Ownership
Dear Council members,
As you are aware, the housing crisis is growing worse every day, especially with the economic consequences of the
shutdown. It is important that the City examine new ideas. Please put the following topics related to attainable home
ownership on the agenda for discussion: Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations, an inclusionary housing
ordinance, and Lamont's proposal for attainable home ownership. Please represent all constituents, but most especially
essential workers.
Very Respectfully,
Yusur Ferman
B.A. Political Science Pre-Law 2024
California State University, Fullerton l Grossmont College
e: yferman@csu.fullerton.edu
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:41 PM
To: Omar Pingel
Subject: RE: Housing
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD,MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a�temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C 11
R
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Omar Pingel <
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:52 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Housing
Dear Council,
The housing crisis is getting worse every day. The City needs to discuss the merits of any new idea or proposal. Please
put the following topics on the agenda for discussion: Warehouse at Creekside regulatory violations, an inclusionary
housing ordinance, and Laurel Lamont's proposal for attainable home ownership. It's important that you represent all
constituents, regardless of economic status.
Thank you,
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:06 PM
To: Mary Ames
Subject: RE: Comments on Inclusionary Affordable Housing for Tonight's meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Original Message
From: Mary Ames<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:52 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Comments on Inclusionary Affordable Housing for Tonight's meeting
> Dear Randi,
>
> Please include the following in the public comments for tonight's (February 23, 2021) meeting of the City Council.
>Thank you,
> Mary Ames
>
>
> Dear Mayor Edwards and members of the City Council:
>
> I am writing to add to the comments that I made at your meeting of January 26, urging the City to adopt an
Inclusionary Affordable Housing ordinance that would,at a minimum, require future residential developments to include
a substantial number of units that people who work in Temecula could afford.
>
>Since that meeting, I have read the Inclusionary Affordable Housing Regulations in the San Diego Municipal Code
(Chapter 14,Article 2, Division 13). Also the Bulletins and the Procedures Manual used to monitor and implement the
regulations. I did this to get a better idea of what is already being done in the region.
>
> It struck me immediately that the San Diego model,though an enlightening example for me to study, may not be right
for Temecula. Thanks to the efforts of many people, some of whom are in this meeting,Temecula is truly a community.
But we are a large community that lacks certain characteristics that could make us even better. We lack tight-knit
neighborhoods where people really know one another and help each other. We lack neighborhoods in which young
singles, older people, single-parents with kids,and two-parent families can all afford to live. We lack neighborhoods
with cultural and racial diversity. In cities that are thriving,you find a mix of people in contact with each other. The
differences and the interaction, promote creativity, mutual aid,the exchange of ideas.
1
> Bringing those missing elements to our community should be among the goals of Inclusionary Affordable Housing in
Temecula. Yes, we want to build less expensive housing for lower income workers, but not that alone. To achieve more,
the City would need to tailor its ordinance carefully. We would not, for example, want to allow a developer -- to make
payments or surrender land in lieu of providing affordable housing, as San Diego does. We would want, instead, for the
affordable housing to be mixed in with market value residences. We might not want to perpetuate the old model that
requires the City, or a housing agency like San Diego's Housing Commission, to serve as overseer. We might prefer to
empower low-income, prospective homeowners to join with higher-income, long-time homeowners, to form non-profit
cooperatives which could develop or redevelop property. The City could provide incentives, waive fees. Models like
that abound. I discussed one of them, known as co-housing, with the city manager and staff several years ago at the
invitation of then-mayor Rahn.
> I don't know what model would work best for our City. But I bet the current staff is sufficiently talented and
experienced that it could develop an extraordinary Inclusionary Affordable Housing program for Temecula -- one that
would make our city an even better place to live and work than it already is.
>Thank you for your serious consideration of this matter.
> Sincerely,
> Mary Ames
>
>Temecula 92592
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:06 PM
To: Laurel LaMont
Subject: RE: Council meeting
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(a�temeculaca.00v
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
-5
Cra'"1-
cares
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Laurel LaMont <
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:00 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Council meeting
To be read into the record February 23
Let me start by saying thank you council members for placing attainable homeownership on the March
9th agenda. This is an incredible step forward in the process of representing the best interest of our local
economic workforce.
While the city's animated housing element video is appreciated, council needs to place the attainable
homeownership proposal on the March 9th agenda. The City received this proposal in April of 2020 and cannot
discuss its merits unless the proposal is on the agenda.
As you may know, I reviewed the contracts regarding the developments in the "pipeline", and to the best of my
knowledge, it is more of the same. With all due respect, these agreements are largely the same as the current
"affordable housing", developments that already exist in Temecula. If these existing developments worked,
there wouldn't be a housing crisis. Solutions require new ideas, not more of the same.
Please place the attainable homeownership proposal on the March 9th agenda.
Laurel LaMont
Sent from my iPhone
1
Erika Ramirez
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:28 AM
To: ctmassa
Subject: RE: Public Comment Agenda Item #5 Council Meeting 2/23
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
-131-
Criatof
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: ctmassa<
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 9:20 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment Agenda Item#5 Council Meeting 2/23
Hi Randi,
Hope you are well. Can you please enter this letter as public comment for Agenda Item 5 in the city council meeting on
2/23? Re:Joint Powers Authority Feasibility Assessment?
Dear Council:
Thank you for continuing to delve further into options for public safety for the city of Temecula. I think if the last year,
especially the last 4-5 months has shown anything, it's that more local control is necessary for our public safety to
improve.
As recommended in the most recent JPA assessment, I support thecurrent proposal to ask the County to do their
own assessment of how they can streamline and tailor the city services and their costs to our city.
In parallel, can we ask Chief Hall to take his annual report from last month a few steps further? Rather than just
regurgitate the metrics, I think the city and it's residents would benefit from the following presented back to
council:
o An actual analysis and interpretation of the data:
-Provide strengths and development areas
-Break out the data to a lower degree of detail, e.g., what are priority one calls?
o Show a year-over-year analysis - what is improving and what is not, and what can we
do about it?
Furthermore, I'd request the city also do an independent study to assess our ability to start our own police
department. As you know, the City of Menifee saved $2.5M in their first six months of operating their own police
department, while also increasing their level of patrols. Menifee is just slightly smaller than Temecula, and we
would likely to be able to scale their implementation.
Thank you for your time.
Thank you,
Christine T. Massa
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Summer Berg
Subject: RE: Agenda Item #5
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl aatemeculaca.aov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Crneor.4.1";:e--4(
CateS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Summer Berg<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:58 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:Agenda Item #5
Good evening City Council members. My name is Summer Berg. I am a member of Temecula
Unity and I have been a proud Temecula citizen for 12 years. After reading the Feasibility
Assessment, I urge the council to support the findings of the assessment and ask the Riverside
County Sheriff's Department to conduct their own cost/benefit analysis and recommend ways
they may reduce the city's costs. Additionally, I found the current assessment to be lacking
interpretation of the data. Please ask Chief Hall to expand his report to analyze the data in
greater detail, including a year-over-year analysis.
Finally, and most importantly, I urge the council to do a Feasibility Assessment on Temecula
starting its own police department. I believe that Temecula will observe significant savings over
what we currently spend on our contracts with the county sheriff's department. This is evident
when we look at the success Menifee has seen with their own Police Department, saving $2.5
million in the first 6 months while increasing patrols. Currently Temecula pays nearly twice as
much per citizen than other nearby cities and I believe that those funds could be utilized more
efficiently. I love living in Temecula and want to be sure that as our community grows, our
services develop to properly support it.
Thank you for the time tonight.
-Summer Berg
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Dean Vasquez
Subject: FW: Letter submitted for Council Meeting tonight
Attachments: City Council Letters Feb 23 2021.pdf
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl(ctemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula, CA 92590
C a S
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Dean Vasquez<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:41 AM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Letter submitted for Council Meeting tonight
Good Day Randi,
Please find 2 letters to submit to the council meeting this evening.They should be labeled correctly, but if any
information is missing please advise and I will correct. One is for item#5 and one for item #10.
Thanks for your wonderful assistance and service to our city!!
Dean
Dean Vasquez
Temecula CA 92592
1
Temecula City Council
Letter from Dean Vasquez,
Temecula CA 92592
To:Council Members, Staff and Community,
Comments for Agenda Item #5:
This letter is to speak about the Joint Police Authority and the study presented. I concur with the report
that there is not a financial benefit of a JPA.Also,as a resident of Temecula, I would strongly oppose
moving from the Riverside Sheriff Department contract to a JPA. I also strongly support the
commissioning of a study into creating an independent Temecula Police Department and would suggest
authorizing the funds to commence such a feasibility study immediately.Over time,Temecula needs and
deserves an independent Law Enforcement agency that answers to the City of Temecula, under the
guidance/control of this City Council.
Thanks
Pearl
„tit 4
Dean V squez
Temecula City Council
Letter from Dean Vasquez,
Temecula CA 92592
To:Council Members, Staff and Community,
Comments for Agenda Item#10:
This letter is to speak in support of the effort to build/convert existing building within the City of
Temecula to a police/sheriff station.
Simply stated-a city the size is Temecula needs to have a centralized response location for law
enforcement to base and we currently do not have such a facility.So I strongly support the addition of a
Station if located in the City of Temecula. It is time to start moving to more local influence and control of
the Law Enforcement in our city, and this is the first step.
Thanks
an
Dean Vasquez
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:57 PM
To:
Subject: FW: Public Safety Concerns in Old Town Temecula
Attachments: Open Letter to the City of Temecula.pdf
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
Original Message
From: Monica Chian <
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:49 PM
To:James Stewart<James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>;Zak
Schwank<Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>;Jessica Alexander
<Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>;Aaron Adams<aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Safety Concerns in Old Town Temecula
Hello City Council Officials,
I am enclosing an Open Letter to the City of Temecula regarding concerns I have in my city relative to topics to be
discussed in your council meeting scheduled for this evening. It is lengthy and contains detailed events. I hope you are
able to take the time to review my letter and look forward to your response.
Sincerely,
Monica Chian
1
February 23, 2021
An Open Letter to the City of Temecula
I am a single working mom living in Temecula, California for nearly 14 years. I moved
here from Los Angeles in 2007 to raise my children and because I wanted to live in a
safer community than where we lived before. Like everywhere else in the world, a lot
has changed since 2007, more so now because of the COVID-19 Pandemic. However,
the change in Temecula is not that it is unusually quiet and closed due to the pandemic.
In 2019, our city was listed as one of the Top 10 Best Wine Travel Destinations. So
when state and county health department officials required bars and restaurants to limit
indoor dining and adhere to recommended safety precautions because of COVID-19,
our city continued to have an insurmountable surge of visitors that poured directly into
Old Town Temecula's bars and restaurants, weekend after weekend. Visitors come
from Los Angeles, Orange, San Diego, San Bernardino, and northern Riverside
counties. From what I've observed, our city does not strictly enforce public health
precautions at this particular location. That is, not as much as our neighboring cities or
counties do and to me, this is the reason more out-of-town visitors come to Old Town
Temecula.
I've worked in Old Town Temecula for 3 years. The store I work at is a family-owned
retail grocery store, located on the corner of Front Street and Main Street, right in the
heart of Old Town Temecula. This intersection is one of the busiest and most crowded
parts of our city on weekends. It was once a fun place to work until the pandemic
started. We are an essential business. To keep our customers and staff at our store
safe and to remain open, our store's owners and managers have adapted to the
infrastructure changes and have operated under the Riverside County Health
Department's COVID-19 safety guidelines since April 2020. In recent months, I have
seen an increase in public violence, vandalism, disorderly drunks, overwhelming traffic
violations, thefts, an obvious lack of public health safety observations, and limited law
enforcement presence. As of last summer, there have been only two Riverside County
Sheriff foot patrol deputies assigned to walk and monitor Old Town Temecula activity 7
days a week. I see these officers on Front Street often and know them by name.
Frequently, patrons who visit from out of town often ask why our city is so "open" as
compared to other cities or counties, why aren't people wearing masks, why are so
many crowded together and not social distancing? I simply explain our town has
become the "speakeasy town" in Southern California that no one talks about. Last fall, a
local publication posted an article about a business in Old Town Temecula trying to
raise concerns about the growing problem. The owner was quickly berated by his
neighboring business owners and was called a "snitch" by the public on social media.
On December 10, 2020, FOXLA televised a report called "It is Business as Unusual in
Temecula" where restaurants openly described ignoring capacity restrictions and mask
mandates, thoroughly enjoying the influx regardless of the consequences. Well, I have
recently become a victim of the violence in the city I call home. This is the purpose of
my letter. It is time someone talks about the crowds, the lack of public safety, and most
importantly, the violence. I would like our city to stop turning a blind eye to the crowds
and to really look at the increase in violence the crowds bring into Old Town Temecula.
At 6 pm Saturday, February 20th, 2021 , all four corners were packed and crowded with
bumper-to-bumper cars, including hot rods, low-riders, and obnoxiously loud
motorcycles cruising up and down Front Street. Hundreds of pedestrians from all over
were shopping, walking, drinking, smoking, or waiting for seating at the restaurants and
bars - nothing new for a Saturday night in Old Town Temecula during a pandemic. The
vibe and spectacle are exciting to witness, especially for visitors. For me, it was time to
close the store. As I was attempting to bring in our store's signage, I noticed a woman's
belongings; her driver's license, credit card, and other items were laying on the steps of
my store's porch. Unbeknownst to me, just moments before I arrived outside, the same
woman and 3 other women allegedly attacked a bystander nearby, kicking her in the
face as she lay on the sidewalk. I didn't witness this but as I started to grab my sign, I
pointed to the items on the ground looking up at one of the women concerned to ask her
if the items were hers but instead was immediately attacked by her. She charged at me,
pushed me, and as I turned to catch my fall she pulled my hair, repeatedly yanking at
my scalp and punching my head. My store manager witnessed the attack and instantly
pulled my assailant off me. My attacker and her 3 other cohorts appeared to be under
the influence of drugs or alcohol or both. They were all restrained by several bystanders
until law enforcement came to the scene. Within 2 hours, charges were pressed,
statements were taken and arrests were made.
This crime will run its course through our justice system but the problem will remain until
something changes. Unlike the woman attacked before me, I have no serious injuries
except for a few bumps and bruises. I am learning to overcome my traumatic
experience. I can recall the conversations with officers who monitored and secured the
crime scene. When I asked one of the officers if this activity has become the norm, his
response was "Yes, just never this early." Another officer explained there aren't enough
Riverside County officers contracted by the city to cover the influx of crimes occurring in
Temecula and therefore, many of them are working overtime. Even the lieutenant
investigating the crime cried out angrily, "This is the last call I'm taking in this overtime
shift tonight! I'm so done with this!" One of the assigned foot patrol deputies I mentioned
earlier in this letter was in the middle of booking a previous arrest elsewhere but he was
radioed by the other officers about my incident and arrived at the scene to take my
statement. Yes, he was just doing his job, but I'll say this, his choice in doing so made
me feel heard, he made me feel important, he made me feel safe.
I understand our City Council meeting's agenda this evening includes a review of
Citygate Associates, LLC's Police Services Joint Power of Authority Feasibility
Assessment for 7 cities in Riverside County, including the City of Temecula. Although
the findings do not recommend establishing a JPA and suggest our city continue to
work within Riverside County Sheriff's Department's recent efforts in place as they are.
If the City of Temecula continues to allow the increase in patronage from neighboring
counties, our city needs to re-evaluate its definition of"satisfaction with police services."
Our city needs to look further into using our tax dollars wisely to increase law
enforcement support and presence. Also on the City Council Agenda is a discussion on
moving Temecula Police Operations within city limits which may help to remedy a part
of this issue and should be immediately looked into. Another possible solution: We have
several "free" parking areas in and around Old Town Temecula. Is there any reason
those spots couldn't be turned into "paid" parking spots where the funds could be used
to pay for any additional police resources? Another suggestion: There are signs posted
at every public park in Riverside County warning the public of its restrictions, otherwise
violators would be subjected to fines up to $1000 or up to 6 months in jail. Is there any
reason the city couldn't post similar warning signs visibly all over Old Town Temecula?
I wish to make it publicly known and raise awareness to all communities, the influx of
visitors and crimes is not what the City of Temecula should continue to permit. I do not
want to simply dismiss what happened that night as just another incident on a typical
Saturday night in Old Town Temecula. It will continue to happen. My daughter works at
my store with me. It terrifies me to think it could have been her in that attack. In
speaking on behalf of many Temecula citizens, we have had enough of this shameless
nonsense. No essential worker, nor should a bystander be subjected to any violence
openly invited into our town. It is bad enough we are all struggling to survive a
pandemic. Allowing the flood of out-of-town patrons from all over to squeeze into 8 tiny
blocks of businesses without adequate measures of control just to pump up our city's
economy is not the answer to our survival, it is detrimental to our public safety. If we are
to continue to keep our bars and restaurants open safely, I am asking our city officials,
our local bar and restaurant owners, and our law enforcement to jointly act for change.
responsibly work towards safer solutions, reevaluate the best way for critical resources
to be utilized and ensure public safety is enforced by the best means possible.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Monica Chian
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:32 PM
To: Lisa Sanchez
Subject: FW: Statement -- Agenda Items 5 and 10
Attachments: City Council Letter Feb 23 2021.pdf
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl ar7.temeculaca.00v
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
'151
(7:e't4.*°"";16(...—
CateS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: L S<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:00 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Lisa Sanchez<
Subject:Statement--Agenda Items 5 and 10
Hello Randi. I hope you are well!! I would like the following statement read at the city council meeting tonight for items
5 and item 10.The statement supports for#10, but focuses mostly on item #5.
Please let me know that you've received this.
Thank you, Lisa
* * *
Dear Mayor Edwards and Council:
I am writing regarding agenda item 10 and 5. I believe I speak for most Temecula residents in supporting the effort to
relocate the police to the heart of the city. On item 5, I do not support the adoption of a multi-city police department
model because Temecula needs its own independent police force.At the same time,the default position of being 1 out
of 17 cities in contract with the Riverside County Sheriff disadvantages Temecula residents for the following 3 reasons:
Number One:Temecula is being overcharged for services relative to other cities.According to the 7-city feasibility study
conducted by Citygate Associates,Temecula paid 25%of the sheriff's personnel costs for all 7 cities—nearly$35
MILLION of the total allocated. Considering the size of our population,Temecula paid almost twice as much on average,
at$304 dollars per person per year, compared to the other 7 cities,which averaged $176 dollars per person per year.
Number Two:There is no indication that Temecula is getting better service for the extra money paid.We rarely see
1
helpful community police officers walking the beat and getting to know residents. This past year, we experienced quite
the opposite. As the Riverside County Sheriff publicly declared his absolute refusal to enforce the constitutionally-valid
public health orders, Temecula's hands were tied event to respond to egregious violations like mass overcrowding and
related violence in Old Town and elsewhere precisely because the sheriff's non-enforcement policy was COUNTY-WIDE
and Temecula lacks its own locally-controlled police force.
Number Three: While Temecula has always taken pride in being a safe city, the FBI's Uniform Crime Report shows an
increase in the crime rate in 8 out of 10 offense categories since 2018.Temecula's crime rate, furthermore, exceeds that
of neighboring cities with their own police department in 8 out of 10 offense categories in Murrieta, for example, and 7
out of 10 in Menifee. In some categories, the crime rate in Temecula is 30 to 50% higher.
Having terminated its RCSD contract and hired its own city police force in 2020, the city of Menifee provides the best
policing model for our area: in just 6 months, it saved the city 2.5 MILLION dollars while adding services and patrol
hours.
Rather than accept an unfair budget and county-wide policies that harm our city, an empowered Temecula city council
could advise and direct its own police force while saving the city money. It could work cooperatively with local police to
tailor policies and practices to our specific needs and could assist the police in finding humane solutions to problems like
homelessness and mental illness, which have increased dramatically in recent years.
Because the sheriff's department has a vested interest in maintaining its contract with our city, Temecula residents
would best be served if the city would commission an independent study or city study with a singular focus: the
feasibility of an independent police force for Temecula.
Thank you, Dr. Lisa Sanchez
2
Dear Mayor Edwards and Council:
I am writing regarding agenda item 10 and 5. I believe I speak for most Temecula residents in
supporting the effort to relocate the police to the heart of the city. On item 5, I do not support the
adoption of a multi-city police department model because Temecula needs its own independent
police force.At the same time, the default position of being 1 out of 17 cities in contract with the
Riverside County Sheriff disadvantages Temecula residents for the following 3 reasons:
Number One:Temecula is being overcharged for services relative to other cities.According to
the 7-city feasibility study conducted by Citygate Associates,Temecula paid 25%of the sheriff's
personnel costs for all 7 cities—nearly $35 MILLION of the total allocated. Considering the size
of our population,Temecula paid almost twice as much on average,at$304 dollars per person
per year,compared to the other 7 cities,which averaged $176 dollars per person per year.
Number Two: There is no indication that Temecula is getting better service for the extra money
paid. We rarely see helpful community police officers walking the beat and getting to know
residents.This past year, we experienced quite the opposite.As the Riverside County Sheriff
publicly declared his absolute refusal to enforce the constitutionally-valid public health orders,
Temecula's hands were tied event to respond to egregious violations like mass overcrowding and
related violence in Old Town and elsewhere precisely because the sheriff's non-enforcement
policy was COUNTY-WIDE and Temecula lacks its own locally-controlled police force.
Number Three: While Temecula has always taken pride in being a safe city,the FBI's Uniform
Crime Report shows an increase in the crime rate in 8 out of 10 offense categories since 2018.
Temecula's crime rate,furthermore,exceeds that of neighboring cities with their own police
department in 8 out of 10 offense categories in Murrieta, for example,and 7 out of 10 in
Menifee. In some categories,the crime rate in Temecula is 30 to 50%higher.
Having terminated its RCSD contract and hired its own city police force in 2020,the city of
Menifee provides the best policing model for our area: in just 6 months, it saved the city 2.5
MILLION dollars while adding services and patrol hours.
Rather than accept an unfair budget and county-wide policies that harm our city,an empowered
Temecula city council could advise and direct its own police force while saving the city money.
It could work cooperatively with local police to tailor policies and practices to our specific needs
and could assist the police in finding humane solutions to problems like homelessness and
mental illness,which have increased dramatically in recent years.
Because the sheriff's department has a vested interest in maintaining its contract with our city,
Temecula residents would best be served if the city would commission an independent study or
city study with a singular focus: the feasibility of an independent police force for Temecula.
Thank you, Dr. Lisa Sanchez
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:31 PM
To: Tami Simms
Subject: RE: Please read at tonights City Council General Meeting (and thank you for all you do
Randi)
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C7e;'":
CateS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Tami Simms<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:22 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Please read at tonights City Council General Meeting(and thank you for all you do Randi)
Council Members,
Thank you first and foremost for allowing me to express my views and concerns for OUR City of Temecula. I have been a
resident of Temecula for over 34 years and care very much about our community and hope to continue to make
Temecula an even better place for ALL of us.
I would like to speak to Agenda item#5 Temecula adopting a regional Police department model. I would encourage you
to consider an independent feasibility study to assess our ability to start our own Police department. We can look at and
adopt things that worked for the City of Menifee for example they have now saved 2.5 million dollars in just their first six
months.Temecula's budget is twice the cost per person at$304.00 per person per year than the average taken from 6
other cities which averaged $176.00 per person per year. We can and will save much needed City dollars by having our
own Police Department. We need to really look at the needs of Temecula and compare to other cities independently to
create the best Police department for our community.
Agenda item#10 Repurposing an existing building into a Temecula Police Station. I support this measure for many
reasons,the main one would be the savings,we currently spend $750,000.00 annually to maintain a facility on the
outskirts of the city. We can refurbish and repurpose a building within the city limits and recover the costs within 10-15
years the city could outright own it. There are several buildings that would work and I support this measure.
Thank you for your time and hard work,
Tami Sims
1
Temecula resident
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:30 PM
To: Ashley Clingingsmith
Subject: FW: Agenda item #5
Attachments: Agenda item#5.docx
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD,MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi johlatemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Cre#4.4.1...°
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Ashley Clingingsmith<cling004@cougars.csusm.edu>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:27 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:Agenda item #5
>On Feb 23, 2021, at 3:25 PM,Ashley Clingingsmith<cling004@cougars.csusm.edu>wrote:
>Good afternoon Randi,
> Please find attached letter for agenda item #5.
>Thanks!
>Ashley Clingingsmith<Agenda item#5.docx>
1
Good afternoon Members of Temecula City Council,
I am writing this letter in regard to agenda item #5. The adoption of a regional police
department model is not supported by myself, nor other Temecula residents for numerous
reasons. Rather, an independent police department model is desired with a feasibility study
conducted prior.
The city's own assessment would rationalize and mold the cost of service to the city. I
ask that Chief Hall extends his data interpretation providing a detailed breakdown of a yearly
analysis showcasing the strengths and areas in need of improvements.
I am inquiring that Temecula conduct an independent assessment of their own with the
end goal of the creation of our own Temecula Police Department. The City of Menifee has
recently acquired their own police department with a cost reduction of 2.5 million within the
first six months. Patrols have been increased without an increased cost to the city. In fact,
Temecula's budget ($304 pp/yr) was twice as high than six other cities involved in the study,
averaging $176 pp/yr. Temecula CAN be like our neighboring cities, providing service to the city
at a lower cost.
Community policing is one goal of an independent police department, where residents
can feel safe, protected and served. The police get to know the residents and adopt a real
relationship. In addition, another hope of mine is that our own police department would work
alongside mental health experts in special cases where one is necessary. Our own department
could provide proper bias training and officers would be well trained and mentally sound.
Temecula could be a model for other cities with the adoption of an independent model with
modernized goals.
Thank you for your time,
Ashley Clingingsmith
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:02 PM
To: Tim McDonald
Subject: RE: Regarding agenda item number#5 (Please read into record 2/23/21 Meeting)
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohlna.temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula,CA 92590
CateS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Tim McDonald <
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:45 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Regarding agenda item number#5 (Please read into record 2/23/21 Meeting)
Good Evening Members of the Temecula City Council,
Regarding agenda item number#5, I would like to commend The City of Temecula and this City Council for exploring
alternatives to contracting our law enforcement services to the Riverside County Sheriff's department.Temecula is now
a city of 115,000 people with its own unique policing needs that it seems like the County Sheriff is struggling to meet.
We are unlike any other city in the county with our own special balance of industry, residency, and tourism. It is time
that we find a law enforcement service that meets our specific fiscal and societal needs. It is no shock to me though that
the Police Services Joint Powers Authority Feasibility Assessment came back not recommending the JPA.The JPA would
have us join forces with many other cities in our area that have a variety of other concerns and needs than our city does
when it comes to policing.The JPA would be too similar of a model to our current one of outsourcing to the Riverside
County Sheriff's to make much difference in any aspect of policing. It is about time that Temecula looks to form its own
department which the city,city council, and its citizens would have more local control over. Our city is now over 30 years
old, has the largest population in the valley, and has the largest budget. How can Murrieta and Menifee, both of which
are smaller and younger cities, have their own departments, but we cannot?There is local interest in this and it's clearly
worth looking into. Reports from the City of Menifee a year after they created their own department and coming back
very positive. I recommend the city initiates its own independent study into the feasibility of starting our own City of
Temecula Police Department.
Thank you for your time and attention given to this matter,
Tim McDonald
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:05 PM
To: Julie Geary
Subject: RE: agenda item #5
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl, JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl(a�temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula. CA 92590
jai
qt
CalleS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Julie Geary<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:24 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: agenda item #5
Members of the Temecula City Council, my name is Julie Geary and I am a member of Temecula
Unity, I have lived in this valley since 1997. I am writing today In regards to agenda item #5. I agree
with the assessment that a regional police department is not the correct nor fiscally responsible
direction for the city to take. However this year has made it apparent that there are severe issues and
systemic leadership concerns with the Riverside County Sheriffs Department that need to be
addressed.
First I would like the city to do a feasibility study on Temecula implementing their own independent
police department. When the city of Menifee initiated a study it was shown that an independent police
department would save the city 5-7million dollars a year and give the city more local control over the
services they provide. Since its adoption last year, the city of Menifee has reported, in a January
Press Enterprise article, that the city saved 2.5 million dollars in its first year of having their own
independent police department, even considering the impacts of covid-19. Temecula needs to know if
an independent police department will be the fiscally responsible measure to take.
Second I would like Chief Hall to provide more insight and analysis with his annual police report to the
city. As a woman of science, I know the importance of presenting and analyzing data to provide more
information. I encourage him to break down the crime statistics into more detail e.g. violent and
nonviolent crime, provide strengths and development areas for law enforcement, and to show a year-
over-year analysis of the data. We should know what is improving and what is not.
We know that there are gaps in social justice, equity, oversight and fiscal responsibility with the
Riverside County Sheriff's department, now is the time to take action, conduct a study and take
control back for our City.
Sincerely,
Julie Geary
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:28 AM
To: ctmassa
Subject: RE: Public Comment Agenda Item #10, Council Meeting 2/23
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl antemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula,CA 92590
—15
CafeS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: ctmassa <
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 9:29 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Public Comment Agenda Item #10, Council Meeting 2/23
Hi Randi,
Thank you for considering my second e-mail. Can you please enter this letter as public comment for Agenda Item 10 in
the city council meeting on 2/23? Re: a Temecula Police Station within city limits?
Dear Council:
Thank you for continuing to delve further into options for public safety for the city of Temecula. As I stated earlier,
we've seen that in the last year, especially the last 4-5 months, more local control and interaction could benefit the
community.
I am supportive of creating a police station within the city limits, especially a more centralized location like the former
city hall building. We know that with the current station in French Valley, response times to city of Temecula can be
anywhere from five minutes to 45 minutes to get to South Temecula.
It's also true that with dispatch being in French Valley, our police are challenged with not being freeway-
adjacent. Criminals in cars can make quick getaways without fear of being quickly apprehended. Just think of
all the bank branches right near freeway on ramps off Ynez Rd.
We could also easily see cost savings from this effort. The city currently spends $750k annually to maintain a
facility on the outskirts of town. The city owns buildings that could be refurbished and repurposed, with ROI in
-10-15 years.
Thank you for considering placement of a police department location in a more centralized location.
Thank you,
Christine T. Massa
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 12:17 PM
To: Summer Berg
Subject: RE: Agenda Item #10
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl atemeculaca.c ov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
Cates
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From: Summer Berg<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:59 AM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject:Agenda Item #10
Good evening City Council members. My name is Summer Berg. I am a member of Temecula
Unity and I have been a proud Temecula citizen for 12 years. I would like to make a statement in
support of item #10 on the agenda. Temecula is in desperate need of its own police station. The
Southwest Sheriff's station is too far away to sufficiently dispatch officers in a timely manner;
response times can be as high as 45 minutes in areas of the city. In an emergency, dispatchers
need to be familiar with the area and officers need to arrive significantly faster. The proposed
building is centrally located and freeway adjacent, which will dramatically improve law
enforcement's ability to react quickly. We are currently spending $750k annually to maintain a
station that is no longer appropriate for the city's needs. Refurbishing an existing building is a
smart investment that the city will see a return on in the future. Thank you for your time this
evening.
-Summer Berg
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:40 PM
To: Ashley Clingingsmith
Subject: FW:Agenda item #10
Attachments: Agenda item#10.docx
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula,CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula,along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Original Message
From: Ashley Clingingsmith<cling004@cougars.csusm.edu>
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:39 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Agenda item#10
Good afternoon Randi,
Attached is my letter for agenda item#10.
Thanks!
Ashley C.
1
Good afternoon Members of Temecula City Council,
I am writing this letter in regard to agenda item #10, the repurposing of an existing
building into a Temecula Police Station.
I am in full support of this agenda item. This is absolutely necessary in order to aid the
adoption of an independent police department for the city of Temecula.
The current station is not located within city limits and 911 dispatch is located in
Riverside, making dispatch less familiar with our city and its landmarks. Current response times
are broadened at 5 to 45 minutes, which is unacceptable in an emergency.
Please take these points into consideration when making your decision.
Thank you for your time,
Ashley Clingingsmith
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:02 PM
To: Tim McDonald
Subject: RE: Regarding agenda item number#10 (Please read into record 2/23/21 Meeting)
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohl antemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
C a e S
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Tim McDonald <
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:56 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: Regarding agenda item number#10 (Please read into record 2/23/21 Meeting)
Good Evening Members of the Temecula City Council,
Regarding agenda item number#10, I am very pleased to see this item on the agenda. I have lived in Temecula for over
30 years now and I have wondered on many occasions why we do not have a proper police station within our City Limits.
The current Base of Operations is so far out of the heart of our city that there is no way it can be part of any efficient
policing model. Having a base much closer to the center of Temecula would more greatly serve the community and its
law enforcement needs. A location much closer to the banks, car dealerships, old town, and our neighborhoods where
the majority of chime takes place makes far more sense than working out of a location out past our airport on the edge
of the most rural part of town. I hope the Council forms the recommended subcommittee to explore this topic.
Thank you for your time and the attention given to this matter,
Tim McDonald
1
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:06 PM
To: Julie Geary
Subject: RE: agenda item #10
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.iohlatemeculaca.gov
41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590
R
CMS
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, maybe subject to the California Public
Records Act, and therefore maybe subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
From:Julie Geary<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:43 PM
To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Subject: agenda item #10
Hello, it's Julie Geary, again, and I am writing for a second time tonight In regards to agenda item
#10. I commend councilor Stew on bringing this important and crucial measure forward and
wholeheartedly agree that Temecula needs its own police station.
Our current police station is not within city limits nor is it near a freeway. This has many negative
impacts on the city including, longer response times to calls, 911 dispatch that is not familiar with the
city, and an increased cost to our cities budget.
Having our own police station near the city center would significantly shorten response times for calls,
this could save lives and prevent crime. It currently can take anywhere from 5-25 minutes for a patrol
car to travel from the station to areas in South Temecula. We could also utilize the 911 dispatch
services of the Murrieta Police department to better serve our community with people that are more
familiar with the area.
Currently we rent the South West detention center and spend around $750,000 a year to maintain a
facility that is not in our city limits on a building we do not own. We own and can repurpose the old
city hall building in the heart of Temecula into a police station. We would see our return of investment
in 10-15 yrs and would immediately see the impact of shorter response times, local control of 911
dispatch, and the accessibility of having a station close to the 15 freeway. Please support this
proposal.
Thank you,
Julie
2
From: Randi Johl
Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:24 PM
To: Allison A Donahoe-Beggs
Subject: RE: Item #10 on City Council Agenda
Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting.
Randi Johl,JD, MMC
Legislative Director/City Clerk
randi.johl@temeculaca.gov
41000 Main St,Temecula, CA 92590
Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula,along with attachments, may be subject to the
California Public Records Act,and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt.
Original Message
From: Allison A Donahoe-Beggs<
Sent:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:22 PM
To: Randi Johl<randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>
Cc: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>
Subject: Item #10 on City Council Agenda
Hello,
I am writing to support the proposal to establish an Independent Police Department in Temecula. This measure would
repurpose an existing building, perhaps the old City Hall building, into a Temecula Police Station. I have been a
Temecula resident since 1998. I do not feel our city is well served by the Riverside County Sheriff. The current station is
in Murrieta which slows response time. It is also not freeway adjacent or close to any of the areas needing to be
protected (Old Town Temecula, businesses along the freeway). I would love if we could have our own Police
Department, much like the city of Menifee recently established. This provides for more community policing, meaning
officers are from this community and get to know the members of this community more intimately. We can then have
our own oversight and ideally, the establishment of partnering services to assist when needed (mental health, domestic
violence, substance abuse,etc,).
Thank you for your time.
Allison Donahoe-Beggs
1