Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
042721 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 27, 2021 - 7:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be received prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on agenda items must be received prior to the time Public Comments for the agenda item is called. Email comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to hear public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the meeting record. CLOSED SESSION - 5:30 P.M. CITY MANAGER ANNUAL PERFORMANCE EVALUATION. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 to evaluate the performance of the City Manager and establish goals and performance objectives for the next year as required by the City Manager's Employment Agreement. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Deacon John Gabriele of St. Catherine of Alexandria Church FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards Page 1 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Proclamation for Conservation Appreciation Month Presentation of Proclamation to Ron Guerriero BOARD AND COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 2. Approve Action Minutes of April 6 and April 13, 2021 Recommendation Attachments: That the City Council approve the action minutes of April 6 and April 13, 2021. April 6, 2021 Minutes April 13, 2021 Minutes Page 2 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands 4. Adopt Ordinance No. 2021-03 Amending Chapter 15.10 to Update the Local Development Mitigation Fee for Funding the Preservation of Natural Ecosystems in Accordance with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP") (Long Range Project No. LR21-0392)(Second Reading) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO.2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10, MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION MITIGATION FEE, OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN Attachments: Agenda Report Ordinance 5. Approve Financial Statements for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. Attachments: Agenda Report Financial Statements 6. Authorize City to Serve as Lead on Preparation and Submission of CAL FIRE Vegetation Management/Fuels Reduction Grant (At the Request of Mayor Pro Tempore Rahn Recommendation: That the City Council provide direction for the City to take the lead on the preparation of a California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection Page 3 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 (CAL FIRE) grant application for the creation of a vegetation management/fuels reduction plan and seek letters of support from regional agencies. Attachments: Agenda Report 7. Approve Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 through 2023-24 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 through 2023-24 2. Designate the City Manager as "Contract Administrator," in accordance with Section E. of the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for the City of Temecula. Attachments: Agenda Report Cooperative Agreement Exhibit A F.xhihit B Exhibit C Exhibit D 8. Approve Third Amendment to the Agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. for Animal Control Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the third amendment to the agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc., in the amount of $120,000, for animal control services within Temecula City limits, for an amended total agreement amount that shall not exceed $720,000, and to extend the term by one year through June 30, 2022. Attachments: Agenda Report Third Amendment 9. Approve First Amendment to the Loan Agreement for Las Haciendas Affordable Housin Development Between the City of Temecula, as Housing Successor to the Former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P. Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. Page 4 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 10. 11. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY) APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution First Amendment Notice of Exemption Approve Funding Agreement Between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and City of Temecula Recommendation: That the City Council approve the funding agreement between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVAPCD") and the City of Temecula ("City"). Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Approve Specifications and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW 19-08 Recommendation Attachments: That the City Council: 1. Approve the specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road; and 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. Agenda Report Project Description Project Location Map 12. Approve Minor Maintenance Agreements for Landscape Maintenance Services with MCE Corporation and Nieves Landscaping, Inc. Recommendation That the City Council: Page 5 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 13. 14. 15. 1. Approve a Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services of Sports Parks and School Sites with MCE Corporation, in the amount of $910,838.40 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. 2. Approve a Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services of Facilities, Medians, Parks, Trails, and Slopes with Nieves Landscape, Inc., in the amount of $1,757,796.00 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement — MCE Corporation Agreement — Nieves Landscape, Inc. Approve First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement with Temecula Valle�pitality, LLC for the Traffic Signal - Park and Ride Access Improvements, PW 18-11 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement with Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC for the Traffic Signal - Park and Ride Access Improvements, PW 18-11. Attachments: Agenda Report First Amendment Project Description Project Map Approve Fifth Amendment to License Agreement No. 96-110 Between City of Temecula and Temeka Advertising for Kiosk Directional Sign Program Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Fifth Amendment to License Agreement No. 96-110 with Temeka Advertising for Kiosk Directional Sign Program. Attachments: Agenda Report Fifth Amendment Approve Fifth Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC for Janitorial Services for City Facilities Recommendation Attachments: That the City Council approve the Fifth Amendment to the Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC, in the amount of $335,367.45, for Janitorial Services for City Facilities. Agenda Report Fifth Amendment 16. Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29 Page 6 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 17. Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of - Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Affidavit and Final Release Project Location Map Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive), PW 15-14 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive), PW15-14, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Affidavit and Final Release RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 7 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 18. Approve Action Minutes of April 13, 2021 Recommendation Attachments That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of April 13, 2021. Action Minutes 19. Approve Financial Statements for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. Attachments: Agenda Report Financial Statements CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 8 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart SARDA PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. SARDA CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 20. Approve Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. Attachments: Agenda Report Financial Statements SARDA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT SARDA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS SARDA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency will be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 9 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart TPFA PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. TPFA CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Public Financing Authority request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 21. Approve Action Minutes of April 13, 2021 Recommendation Attachments That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of April 13, 2021. Action Minutes 22. Adopt Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 Leaving Special Taxes Within Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) Generally Located West of Date Street Between Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive (Second Reading) Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 2021-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) Attachments: Agenda Report OrdinnnrP TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 10 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 TPFA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 11 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before or during a public hearing in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) in the manner prescribed in the important notice at the top of this agenda. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk prior to, the public hearing. 23. Approve Fiscal Year 2021-22 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2021-22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A Notice of Public Hearing 24. Adopt Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF)Pro-ram Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THAT IT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15061, 15062 AND 15378 Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Notice of Public Hearing Page 12 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 BUSINESS 25. Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with Applied Development Economics and Appoint Blue Ribbon Committee Members for the Update to the Quality of Life Master Plan Recommendation: That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Applied Development Economics, in the amount of $175,050, with a 10% contingency of $17,505, for a total agreement amount of $192,555, to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), and appoint Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) members to assist in developing the update to the plan. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement Exhibit A and B QLMP Process Graphic Blue Ribbon Committee List DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 26. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report PlanningActivity Report 27. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Monthly Report 28. Police Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Service Call Statistics 29. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT Page 13 City Council Agenda April 27, 2021 ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, May 11, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 14 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 6, 2021 -10:00 AM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be received prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on agenda items must be received prior to the time Public Comments for the agenda item is called. Email comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to hear public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the meeting record. CALL TO ORDER at 10:05 AM: Mayor Maryann Edwards FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander (absent), Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart BUSINESS 1. Conduct Workshop Regarding Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI)Initiative Workshop conducted, no actions. ADJOURNMENT At 1:20 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 13, 2021, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 13, 2021 - 7:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting was conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on matters not on the agenda must be received prior to the time the item for Public Comments is called. Email comments on agenda items must be received prior to the time Public Comments for the agenda item is called. Email comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to hear public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the meeting record. CLOSED SESSION - 6:30 P.M. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — POTENTIAL LITIGATION. The City Council convened in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to one matter of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City. Based on existing facts and circumstances, the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. CALL TO ORDER at 7:03 PM: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Associate Pastor Wesley Sabio of Reliance Church FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Presentation of Proclamation for DMV/Donate Life Month BOARD AND COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission, Public/Traffic Safety Commission, and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on non-agendized item(s): • Bob Kowell PJ in Temecula • Rick Reiss The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on an agendized item(s): • Joy Wilson (Item #16) Danica Walker (Item #16) • Geraldine Alicia Dearie (Item #16) Nina Hardwick (Item #16) • Adam Rickets (Item #16) Carol Haley (Item #16) • Dawnielle Selden (Item #16) Sue Reichel (Item #16) • Tish B (Item # 16) Fabiola Vazquez (Item # 16) • Melinda Shaw (Item #16) Alissa Nazar (Item #16) • Anonymous (Item #16) Bob Kowell (Item #16) • Tania Reuben (Item #16) Christine Fontes (Item #16) • Sharon C. Mayberry (Item #16) DeeDee Moreda (Item #16) • Jane Lauhon (Item # 16) David and Dara Davis (Item # 16) • Jessica Alexander (Item #16) Ken Thurm (Item #16) • Tim Thompson (Item # 16) Shannon Perkins (Item # 16) • John Andrews (Item #16) Andy Saenz (Item #16) • Krystyn Tello (Item # 16) Diana Gray (Item # 16) • Breanna Owens (Item #16) Darlene McClintock (Item #16) • Richard Owens (Item #16) Cindy Cunniffe (Item #16) • Jennifer Chilton (Item # 16) Les Jenkins (Item # 16) • Holly McKinley (Item #16 Kimberly Mungarro (Item #16) • Al Crossland (Item #16) Mark Lane (Item #16) • Nicky Thompson (Item #16) R K (Item #16) • Jonathan Wigal (Item # 16) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Approve Action Minutes of March 23, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of March 23, 2021. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-15 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Approve City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of February 28, 2021. Adopt Resolution Reaffirming and Proclaiming the Existence of a Local Emergency Related to the COVID-19 Virus Pandemic Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REAFFIRMING AND PROCLAIMING THE EXISTENCE OF A LOCAL EMERGENCY RELATING TO THE COVID-19 VIRUS PANDEMIC AND ISSUING CERTAIN ORDERS FOR THE CONDUCT OF CITY AFFAIRS DURING THE LOCAL EMERGENCY Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Stewart, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Alexander opposing. Approve Renaming Roripaugh Ranch CommunitySports Park to the Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend At the Request of Council Member Zak Schwank) Recommendation: That the City Council approve the renaming of Roripaugh Ranch Community Sports Park to the Sports Ranch at Sommers Bend. 7. Approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC, for Facility Condition Assessment 3 Recommendation: That the City Council approve an agreement for consultant services with Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC, in the amount of $93,026.00, to provide a Facility Condition Assessment at various locations on City property. 8. Approve Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Purchase of 840 Square Foot Permanent Easement on 27511 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula (APN 921-480-032) in Connection with Overland Drive Extension Project (PW16-06) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT, SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT, GENERAL RELEASE, AND JOINT ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND MARK MCMILLIN, LLC IN CONNECTION WITH THE OVERLAND DRIVE EXTENSION PROJECT, PW 16-06 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve and execute all necessary documents, including those in substantially the form attached to the agenda report, and take all necessary actions to effectuate the purchase of the approximate 840 square foot Permanent Easement on the real property located at 27511 Commerce Center Drive, Temecula (Assessor's Parcel Number 921-480-032). 9. Approve the Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Solicitation of Construction Bids for the Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation Project, PW18-03 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation Project, PW18-03; and 2. Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids; and 3. Make a finding that this project is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15302, Replacement or Reconstruction, of the CEQA Guidelines. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 10. Approve Parcel Map 37615 (Located on the West Side of Cantrell Road North of Calle Cha os Recommendation: That the City Council approve Parcel Map 37615, located on the west side of Cantrell Road north of Calle Chapos, for subdivision purposes. 11. Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Mini Pump Track at Ronald Reagan Sports Park, PW20-09 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the improvements for the Mini Pump Track at Ronald Reagan Sports Park, PW20-09, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond not less than 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. RECESS: At 8:02 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Temecula Public Financing Authority. At 8:29 PM, the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 15. Approve Proposed Ordinance to Update the Local Development Mitigation Fee for Funding the Preservation of Natural Ecosystems in Accordance with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP") and Local Development Mitigation - Fee Resolution (Long Range Project No. LR21-0392) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10, MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION MITIGATION FEE, OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 5 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-18 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 15.10 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. BUSINESS 16. Adopt Resolution Formalizing Previous Direction Regarding the Conduct of In -Person Public Meetings and Provide Additional Direction As Needed Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the following resolution formalizing its direction regarding the conduct of in -person public meetings and provide additional direction as needed: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SETTING FORTH THE PROTOCOL FOR THE CONDUCT OF IN PERSON PUBLIC MEETINGS DURING THE EXISTENCE OF A STATE DECLARED EMERGENCY FOR THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Alexander opposing. Motion to revisit the matter at the June 22, 2021 City Council meeting. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT 6 ADJOURNMENT At 10:05 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Adjourned in Memory of John Degange Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $3,127,472.93. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of April, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 04/01/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 1,996,511.79 04/08/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 581,709.32 04/01/2021 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 549,251.82 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 4/27/2021 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 3,127,472.93 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 393,167.15 002 MEASURE S FUND 4,278.05 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 2,257.48 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2,113.17 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 182,971.12 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 458.70 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 9,408.97 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 5,735.73 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 183,409.36 300 INSURANCE FUND 36,550.61 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 2,150.91 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 96,831.31 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 40,243.13 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 6,667.16 340 FACILITIES 18,981.51 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,556,840.63 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 51.62 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 51.64 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 51.64 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 58.65 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 51.64 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 65.65 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 51.62 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 114.82 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 54.16 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 540.01 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 267.16 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 135.16 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 69.67 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 54.00 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 3,195.91 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 54.00 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 54.16 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 27.00 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 2,860.77 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 406.53 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 81.00 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 207.85 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 27.00 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 567.14 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 339.29 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 3,747.80 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 1,111.79 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 27.00 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 27.24 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 292.33 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 63.05 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 70.65 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 197.65 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 21,136.49 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 44.03 $ 2,578,221.11 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 297,146.31 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 475.35 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,326.08 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 122,792.96 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,313.98 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 547.84 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 2,763.09 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,292.17 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 2,009.03 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 35,686.42 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,754.68 340 FACILITIES 7,580.61 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 112.85 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 112.80 474 AD03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 112.80 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 143.55 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 112.80 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 174.30 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 112.81 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 0.07 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 0.57 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 0.57 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.57 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 0.57 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 0.57 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 0.07 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 275.44 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 0.07 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.57 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 0.07 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 137.70 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 13.79 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 0.07 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 0.07 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 13.79 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.07 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 82.63 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 115.65 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 275.44 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 523.42 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 0.07 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 0.86 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 220.34 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 27.54 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 0.07 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.57 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 550.88 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 0.07 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 66,439.22 549,251.82 TOTAL BY FUND: $ 3,127,472.93 apChkLst 03/30/2021 1:37:54PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 500327 4/1/2021 004802 ADLERHORST INTERNATIONAL FEB K9 TRAINING: KING/MUSHINSKIE: LLC POLICE 500328 4/1/2021 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW REPAIRS: VILLAGES BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE SLOPE SEMAN BACKFLOW REPAIRS: VAIL RANCH SLOF BACKFLOW REPAIRS: SLOPES BACKFLOW REPAIRS: VINTAGE HILLS BACKFLOW TESTS: WOLF CREEK SLOP BACKFLOW TESTS: VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW TESTS: VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW TESTS: VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW TESTS - VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW TESTS: VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW TESTS: VARIOUS SLOPES BACKFLOW REPAIRS: WOLF CREEK SLC BACKFLOW REPAIRS: RANCHO CAL ME[ BACKFLOW REPAIRS: VINEYARDS BACKFLOW REPAIRS: PRESLEY BACKFLOW TESTS: RANCHO CAL MEDI/ 500329 4/1/2021 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO MAR DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: POLICE 500330 4/1/2021 021349 CASA CENTER AGAINST SART EXAMS: POLICE SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV CO SART EXAMS: POLICE SART EXAMS: POLICE SART EXAMS: POLICE SART EXAMS: POLICE SART EXAMS: POLICE SART EXAMS: POLICE 500331 4/1/2021 021133 CNS ENGINEERS INC 12/5-1/29 ENG SVCS: OVRLND BR PW16-05 500332 4/1/2021 017542 COX, KRISTI LYN 500333 4/1/2021 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC 500334 4/1/2021 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL SRVCS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS PLUMBING REPAIR - STA 95 COVID CLEANING: CRC TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC PORTABLE RESTROOM & SINK RENTAL: Amount Paid 350.00 1,225.00 805.00 744.00 567.00 459.00 378.00 351.00 324.00 297.00 297.00 270.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 240.00 81.00 56.57 1,200.00 1,200.00 1,200.00 800.00 800.00 800.00 300.00 21,359.07 300.00 125.00 325.56 145.00 114.21 Page: 1 Check Total 350.00 6,758.00 56.57 6,300.00 21,359.07 300.00 125.00 584.77 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 03/30/2021 1:37:54PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 500335 4/1/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK 1,462.18 MAINT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI 1,019.48 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PN 188.77 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT 150.07 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE 132.77 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PW CIP 130.15 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: P 98.23 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 41.36 3,223.01 500336 4/1/2021 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES, ENG CONSULT SVCS: OVERLAND: 13,935.20 13,935.20 OF SOUTHERN CALIF., INC. PW20-11 500337 4/1/2021 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARI 672.71 LOCATIONS IRRIGATION REPAIRS: SLOPES 582.04 FEB OVERLAND EXTENSION PROJ LDS( 300.00 1,554.75 500338 4/1/2021 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MPSC: TCSD 810.19 810.19 INC 500339 4/1/2021 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT FEB COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR: 3,210.43 SOLUTIONS CITYWIDE FEB COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR: CIT 256.05 3,466.48 500340 4/1/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY MISC PARTS: LIGHT REPAIR STA 84 625.32 625.32 INC 500341 4/1/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 400.00 400.00 DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 500342 4/1/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW 605.64 INC TRAFFIC Vehicle Washing Services: PW— 248.28 853.92 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 03/30/2021 1:37:54PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 500343 4/1/2021 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 11,806.39 GERSHON FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 5,658.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 4,400.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 4,328.91 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 4,218.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 3,108.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 2,536.50 NOV 2020 LEGAL SERVICES 2,191.32 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 1,311.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 1,237.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 942.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 556.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 513.00 JAN 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 484.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 176.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 142.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 137.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 114.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 85.50 43,946.62 500344 4/1/2021 000820 WINCHAK KRIS R, DBA K R W & FEB ENG PLN CK-REVIEW: PW LID 7,910.00 7,910.00 ASSOCIATES Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 112,558.90 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 03/30/2021 1:37:54PM CITY OF TEMECULA 18 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 112,558.90 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 10752 3/26/2021 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VARIOUS FEB WATER 3001042 30600 DISTRICT PAUBA RD 10776 3/23/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER FEB WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT DIST SPRINGS 10777 3/23/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-33-237-4818 30499 RANCHO CAL RD 10778 3/23/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS CHILDREN'S MUSEUM 10779 3/23/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER FEB WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT DIST SPRINGS 10780 3/23/2021 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER FEB WATER SVCS 39569 SERAPHINA DIST RD 10781 3/23/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR 8448400730524464 30600 PAUBA RD 10782 3/23/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-26-887-0789 40233 VILLAGE RD 10783 3/23/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-00-397-5059 33340 CAMINO PIEDRA 10784 3/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS EXTERNAL DMV LINE 10786 3/25/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 42569 MARGARITA RD 10787 3/25/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 30875 RANCHO VISTA RD 10788 3/25/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY FEB 091-085-1632-0 41951 MORAGA RD 10789 3/26/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-29-974-7568 26953 YNEZ RD 10790 3/26/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-31-693-9784 26036 YNEZ RD 10791 3/29/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON FEB 2-30-099-3847 29721 RYECREST Amount Paid Check Total 13,007.72 13,007.72 30.50 30.50 108.27 108.27 130.98 130.98 147.37 147.37 197.49 197.49 609.14 609.14 2,030.74 2,030.74 6,633.25 6,633.25 74.55 74.55 598.64 598.64 598.64 598.64 1,892.17 1,892.17 114.18 114.18 376.60 376.60 15.51 15.51 Page-1 apChkLst 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 10792 3/29/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY FEB 055-475-6169-5 32380 DEER 47.24 47.24 HOLLOW WAY 10793 3/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST 49.77 49.77 10794 3/29/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS SKATE PARK 158.19 158.19 AND MPSC 10795 3/29/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS CITY HALL 295.98 295.98 10796 3/29/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY FEB 015-575-0195-2 STA 92 32211 445.59 445.59 WOLF 10797 3/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 32380 DEER 598.64 598.64 HOLLOW WAY 10798 3/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 41845 6TH ST 598.64 598.64 10799 3/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 28922 PUJOL ST 598.64 598.64 10800 3/30/2021 005460 U S BANK '17 TAXALLOCATION BONDS DEBT 1,556,840.63 1,556,840.63 SRVC A&B 10801 4/1/2021 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT 899.07 899.07 SUPPORT 10802 4/1/2021 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT 19,856.27 19,856.27 THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 10803 4/1/2021 021301 I C MA RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 1,134.62 1,134.62 106474 PAYMENT 10804 4/1/2021 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 15,048.98 15,048.98 303355 PAYMENT 10805 4/1/2021 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAXES PAYMENT 26,191.46 26,191.46 10806 4/1/2021 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAXES PAYMENT 87,080.70 87,080.70 10807 4/1/2021 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 13,240.57 13,240.57 SOLUTION 10808 4/1/2021 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT 344.39 344.39 SOLUTION PAYMENT Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 10809 4/1/2021 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 205275 4/1/2021 013387 ADAME LANDSCAPE INC, DBA MAR CLEANING SRVCS: PRKG SWEEPING UNLIMITED STRUCTURE 205276 4/1/2021 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH MAR EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM: LLC, DBAAETNA RESOURCES HR 205277 4/1/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES SUMMER DAY CAMP SUPPLIES: CRC INC MISC SMALL TOOLS/ EQUIPMENT: EM MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD BOOKS: RHRTPL: LIBRARY BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC CABLE BOXES: CONF ROOOM PROJ: IN[ BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY 205278 4/1/2021 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE AFN DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE 205279 4/1/2021 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY BOOK COLLECTIONS: LIBRARY 205280 4/1/2021 022488 BIKE SHOP OF TEMECULA, bicycle equipment & supplies: tern THE 205281 4/1/2021 004262 BIO TOX LABORATORIES 205282 4/1/2021 016870 BLAZAR COMMUNICATIONS INC 205283 4/1/2021 015834 BOYER WAYNE E, DBA MOTOPORT USA PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: POLICE PHLEBOTOMY SERVICES: POLICE PKG TRACKING SFTWR RENEWAL:CENTRALSVCS A % I I [a] Ell] 2 1101 4ARMgo] III IN= Amount Paid 2,020.08 540.00 1,029.60 472.73 243.54 42.33 10.86 62.75 338.42 206.55 157.36 116.90 1,317.83 284.66 232.11 28.59 22.41 174.86 56.51 597.63 30.94 38.53 104.52 20.09 152.62 12.16 247.40 3,863.00 3,661.00 184.00 3,000.00 115.28 Check Total 2,020.08 540.00 1,029.60 1,534.54 1,434.73 1,755.63 247.40 7,708.00 3,000.00 115.28 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205284 4/1/2021 001054 CALIF BUILDING OFFICIALS, REGIST. WEBINAR: BOARD &TIRADO (CALBO) MEMBERSHIP DUES: CLEMENTS, BRIAN 205285 4/1/2021 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES MAR 14 COPIER LEASE - CIVIC CTR INC 205286 4/1/2021 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW KEYBOARD & MOUSE REPLACEMENT: GOVERNMENT LLC IT KEYBOARD REPLACEMENT: LIBRARY 205287 4/1/2021 016446 CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC, SHIRTS/HATS: CRC DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS 205288 4/1/2021 021291 COOKE AARON, DBA PROPER Signage for Day Camp: CRC MANAGEMENT 205289 4/1/2021 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 205290 4/1/2021 017038 CPS HR CONSULTING RECLASSIFICATION STUDY: HR 205291 4/1/2021 012600 DAVID EVANS AND FEB CONST BID SUPPOT: SANTA ASSOCIATES INC GERTRUDIS CR 205292 4/1/2021 021756 EDWARDS, JOEL REISSUE REFUND: SOFTBALL REGISTRATION 205293 4/1/2021 012747 EMERGENCY LIGHTING EMERGENCY LIGHTING SVCS: EQUIPMENT, SERVICE THEATER COMPANY INC DBA: 205294 4/1/2021 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 205295 4/1/2021 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 205296 4/1/2021 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 205297 4/1/2021 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD KRACH, BREE - CASE# 603016103 205298 4/1/2021 022500 FRESNO POLICE DEPT MOTORCYCLE TRAINING: VEROSTEK REGIONAL 4/26-5/07 205299 4/1/2021 013076 GAUDETYVONNE M, DBAYES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS YOU CAN DRAW 205300 4/1/2021 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC MISC SUPPLIES TVM /ACE: TVM MISC SUPPLIES TVM / ACE: TVM Amount Paid Check Total 140.00 295.00 435.00 671.56 671.56 1,842.52 257.90 2,100.42 1,403.96 1,403.96 728.47 728.47 1,487.50 1,487.50 5,531.25 5,531.25 978.00 978.00 600.00 600.00 1,250.00 1,250.00 1,726.55 1,726.55 215.93 215.93 100.00 100.00 13.32 13.32 1,864.00 1,864.00 1,330.00 1,330.00 143.79 628.40 772.19 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205301 4/1/2021 012066 GEOCON WEST INC Geotech review: solana winchester 205302 4/1/2021 021365 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC FEB CLAIM ADJUSTER SVCS: EOC/RISK MGMT 205303 4/1/2021 019721 GOVCONNECTION INC TELECONFERENCING EQUIP: PD MALL 205304 4/1/2021 022478 GOVQA LLC 3/1/21-2/28/22 SFTWRE WEB SUBSCR: RCRDS 205305 4/1/2021 020849 IN THE MIX SOUND LLC MISC STAGE SUPPLIES: THEATER 205306 4/1/2021 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS PAYMENT 205307 4/1/2021 021896 JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA BUSINESS CARDS:HR DEPT MINUTEMAN PRESS 205308 4/1/2021 015358 KELLY PAPER COMPANY INC MISC PAPER SUPPLIES:CENTRAL SVCS MISC PAPER SUPPLIES:CENTRAL SVCS 205309 4/1/2021 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY AND FEB HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 WHITMORE 205310 4/1/2021 004803 MAPLOGIC CORPORATION MAP LAYOUT MGR SFTWR RENEWAL: GIS 205311 4/1/2021 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC ENHANCHED CLEANING: CIVIC CTR 205313 4/1/2021 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL PAYMENT COMPANY 205314 4/1/2021 013443 MIDWEST TAPE LLC BOOKS ON TAPE: LIBRARY 205315 4/1/2021 017861 MYTHOS TECHNOLOGY INC APR-JUN MONITORING SVCS: TVE2 205316 4/1/2021 022499 NAPOLI, RITA REFUND: THEATER CUSTOMER CREDIT 205317 4/1/2021 006140 NORTH JEFFERSON BUSINESS APR-JUN '21 ASSN DUES 3561 #20: FV PARK APR-JUN'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #16: FV APR-JUN'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #17: FV APR-JUN'21 ASSN DUES 3561 #19: FV Amount Paid Check Total 2,500.00 2,500.00 2,640.00 2,640.00 124.48 124.48 8,585.00 8,585.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 40.00 40.00 291.23 291.23 -488.02 1,253.89 765.87 960.00 960.00 625.00 625.00 270.00 270.00 12,756.00 12,756.00 33.81 33.81 450.00 450.00 50.50 50.50 689.51 546.06 507.19 663.29 2,406.05 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205318 4/1/2021 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 205319 4/1/2021 010590 PETRICKA, TAMMY REIMB:OFFICE SUPPLIES/PW INSPECTORS 205320 4/1/2021 010338 POOLAND ELECTRICAL, VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS PRODUCTS INC VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 205321 4/1/2021 021270 POSPAPER.COM THERMAL PAPER FOR CITES: TEM SHERIFF 205322 4/1/2021 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 205323 4/1/2021 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE BANNERS: ECON DEV ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME SIGNSGRAPHICS 205324 4/1/2021 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PKASSOC APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: FOC APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: DIAZ R[ APR-JUN'21 BUS PK ASSN DUE: TVE2 205325 4/1/2021 011853 RANCON COMMERCE CNTR APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: PH2,3&4 OVRLND PRJT APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: STN 73 APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLN APR-JUN'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLN 205326 4/1/2021 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO FEB EMERG RADIO RENTAL: POLICE TECHNOLOGY 205327 4/1/2021 008739 ROSE CITY LABEL, AKA THE CRIME PREV SUPPLIES: TEM SHERIFF BADGER CRIME PREV SUPPLIES: TEM SHERIFF 205328 4/1/2021 017549 ROSEN AND ROSEN SAFETY CLOTHING: PW PARK MAINT INDUSTRIES INC, DBA RAND R INDUSTRIES 205329 4/1/2021 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PHOTOGRAPHY SRVCS: ABBY REINKE PRESTON '21 205330 4/1/2021 007345 SDSU RESEARCH RADIO COMMUNICATION TOWER FOUNDATION LEASE: I.T. 205331 4/1/2021 013695 SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA: 2/22-25 DOC SHRED SRVCS: CITY SHRED -IT USA LLC FACS Amount Paid Check Total 221.00 200.68 93.72 77.72 444.17 77.72 269.75 253.15 1,680.00 1,843.17 2,033.07 2,234.14 177.27 510.71 249.03 198.38 2,159.91 1,639.10 965.60 4,033.20 175.00 7,274.36 199.40 221.00 200.68 693.33 269.75 253.15 1,680.00 6,110.38 1,135.39 2,159.91 2,604.70 4,033.20 175.00 7,274.36 199.40 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205334 4/1/2021 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 205335 4/1/2021 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 205336 4/1/2021 019494 SUPPORT WAREHOUSE SERVER SUPPORT WARRANTY: INFO LIMITED TECH 205337 4/1/2021 017796 TAKKTAMERICAN HOLDING, GIFT SHOP MISC SUPPLIES: T. INC, SPG US RETAIL MUSEUM RESOURCE LL 205338 4/1/2021 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT 205339 4/1/2021 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CENTER COMPANY PLUMBING SUPPLIES: VARIOUS PARKS 205340 4/1/2021 000161 TYLER TECHNOLOGIES, INC SUPPORT & LICENSING:TYLER EXECUTIME 205341 4/1/2021 007987 WALMART MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 205342 4/1/2021 008668 WES FLOWERS SUNSHINE FUND SUNSHINE FUND SUNSHINE FUND 1002078 3/24/2021 022496 TRUONG, HIEU VAN REFUND: PENALTY FEE PAID IN ERROR Amount Paid Check Total 8,869.34 8,869.34 1,559.75 1,559.75 867.00 867.00 287.65 287.65 4,942.22 4,942.22 924.38 202.42 1,126.80 3,809.14 3,809.14 60.79 60.79 99.49 99.49 99.49 298.47 35.00 35.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,883,952.89 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 04/01/2021 11:35:40AM CITY OF TEMECULA 100 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,883,952.89 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/06/2021 2:24:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 500345 4/8/2021 021349 CASA CENTER AGAINST SART EXAMS: POLICE SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV CO 500346 4/8/2021 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: VARI FAC 500347 4/8/2021 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR HVAC INC 500348 4/8/2021 001393 DATA TICKET INC, DBA FEB CITATION PROCESSING: CSD REVENUE EXPERTS 500349 4/8/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPECTORS FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: EOC FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP' 500350 4/8/2021 015966 ERGO SOLUTION INC ERGO EVALUATIONS: HR 500351 4/8/2021 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PLANNING MISC OFC SUPPLIES: FINANCE Misc office supplies: Bldg & Safety 500352 4/8/2021 013827 MIKO MOUNTAINLION INC CHANNEL CLEAN-UP: LONG CANYON BASIN 500353 4/8/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOC INC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATER ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: MPSC 500354 4/8/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS GRAPHICS FOR ART EVENTS: TVM 500355 4/8/2021 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS: TEM CRK MANAGEMENT 2/8-15 HOMELESS ENCAMPMENTS:SITES 4-6,1 FEB CLEANUP SRVCS:CITY R-O-WS CREDIT: BILLING ADJ/APPLIED TO INV# ' Amount Paid Check Total 300.00 300.00 6,765.00 6,765.00 181.84 181.84 200.00 200.00 343.31 339.86 95.54 39.12 817.83 1,000.00 1,000.00 152.26 77.10 65.25 55.52 23.69 16.81 390.63 41,040.00 41,040.00 2,462.27 1,163.72 501.92 435.08 241.34 94.23 57.89 29.60 4,986.05 1,260.00 400.00 1,660.00 6,855.00 2,265.00 1,774.00 -1,774.00 9,120.00 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 04/06/2021 2:24:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 500356 4/8/2021 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND GERSHON 500357 4/8/2021 013482 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES INC, DBA BAS SECURITY (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 5,386.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 5,152.14 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 1,877.50 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 1,363.00 FEB 2021 LEGAL SERVICES 204.00 13,983.14 3/1-28 AFTER HRS SECURITY: PUMP 4,424.00 4,424.00 TRACK Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 84,868.49 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 04/06/2021 2:24:47PM CITY OF TEMECULA 13 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 84,868.49 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 10699 3/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 022442 PROPANE PRODUCTS.COM JC GENERATOR PARTS: FIRE STA92 10700 3/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 006952 PAYPAL JH VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO TRANSACTION 022441 ROTOBRUSH INTERNATIONAL JH AIR DUCT CLEANER: FIRE DEPT LLC 10812 3/30/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-28-331-4847 32805 PAUBA RD 10813 3/30/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-30-296-9522 46679 PRIMROSE AVE 10814 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-35-164-3242 44270 MEADOWS PKWY 10815 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-35-164-3515 32932 LEENA WAY 10816 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-35-164-3663 42335 MEADOWS PKWY 10817 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-35-164-3770 43487 BUTTERFIELD STG 10818 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-40-576-0232 44173 BUTTERFIELD STG 10819 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-33-357-5785 44747 REDHAWK PKWY 10820 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-41-072-5394 29429 TEMECULA PKWY 10821 4/1/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS COMMUNITY CENTER 10823 4/1/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON MAR 2-34-624-4452 STA 95 32131 S LOOP RD 10824 4/1/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS CITY HALL 10825 4/1/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS CITY HALL Amount Paid Check Total 2,274.75 2,274.75 25.00 5,390.00 5,415.00 80.20 80.20 552.03 552.03 13.23 13.23 13.39 13.39 13.39 13.39 14.93 14.93 17.33 17.33 28.90 28.90 75.37 75.37 120.98 120.98 1,413.41 1,413.41 2,877.18 2,877.18 5,611.27 5,611.27 Page:1 apChkLst 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 10826 4/2/2021 001986 MUZAK LLC APR DISH NETWORK 41952 6TH ST 11.03 11.03 10827 4/2/2021 001986 MUZAK LLC APR DISH NETWORK 41952 6TH ST 47.89 47.89 10828 4/2/2021 001986 MUZAK LLC APR DISH NETWORK STA 95 32131 155.08 155.08 10829 4/2/2021 001986 MUZAK LLC APR DISH NETWORK 43230 BUS PARK 166.27 166.27 DR 10830 4/2/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS STATION 73 171.84 171.84 10831 4/2/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC MAR INTERNET SVCS LIBRARY 190.98 190.98 10832 4/2/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR 8448400731120791 29119 1,655.67 1,655.67 MARGARITA 10833 4/5/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS OTA 32364 119.99 119.99 OVERLAND TRL 10834 4/5/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 40820 598.64 598.64 WINCHESTER RD 10835 4/5/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE MAR INTERNET SVCS 28300 598.64 598.64 MERCEDES ST 205343 4/6/2021 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND, NOTARY PUBLIC BOND RECORDING: 69.00 69.00 RECORDER CITY CLERK 205344 4/8/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES BOOKS RHRTPL: LIBRARY 51.98 INC MISC EMERGENCY SUPPLIES: COVID-1� 48.15 MISC OFC SUPPLIES:PD MALL STOREFF 78.88 MISC SUPPLIES EXHIBITS & EVENTS: T\ 3,224.80 SUPPLIES FOR EMPLOYEES: HR 222.96 SUPPLIES FOR EMPLOYEES: HR 538.08 MISC OFC SUPPLIES - PREV: FIRE 244.48 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: POLICE 174.33 MISC. SMALL TOOLS/ EQUIPMENT: EM 250.11 4,833.77 205345 4/8/2021 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES APR STAND BY FEE: POLICE 1,339.00 AFN DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE 563.39 1,902.39 205346 4/8/2021 001947 AMERIGAS PROPANE FUEL - FIRE STA 73 745.97 PROPANE FUEL - FIRE STA 95 1,013.32 1,759.29 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205347 4/8/2021 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 205348 4/8/2021 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS LORENA HANCOCK 205349 4/8/2021 012859 BARRETT ENGINEERED MISC HVAC PARTS: PW FACILITIES PUMPS MISC HVAC PARTS: PW FACILITIES 205350 4/8/2021 022477 BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS STAFF TRAINING: POLICE STAFF TRAINING, INC 205351 4/8/2021 022488 BIKE SHOP OF TEMECULA, BICYCLE EQPMNT & SUPPLIES: THE POLICE 205352 4/8/2021 011348 BONCOR WATER SYSTEMS APR WTR TANK FILTER REPL: STA 73 LLC, DBA SUNSHINE WATER SOFT 205353 4/8/2021 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW wireless headset:risk manag analyst/HR GOVERNMENT LLC 205354 4/8/2021 009640 CERTIFION CORP DBA MAR ONLINE DATABASE SUBSCR: ENTERSECT POLICE 205355 4/8/2021 004837 CHERRY VALLEY FEED & PET k9 food: tern sheriff SUPLY 205356 4/8/2021 016446 CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC, VOLUNTEER T-SHIRTS: AQUATICS DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS 205357 4/8/2021 005417 CINTAS PROTECTION NO 2, FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT CINTAS FIRE 636525 FIRE EXTINGUISHER INSPECTIONS: PD 205358 4/8/2021 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA MAR FSA & COBRAADMIN: HR THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 205359 4/8/2021 011922 CORELOGIC INC, DBA MAR PROP ID SFTWR: CODE CORELOGIC SOLUTIONS ENFORCEMENT 205360 4/8/2021 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 205361 4/8/2021 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 MISC SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 205362 4/8/2021 001233 DANS FEED AND SEED INC MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT Amount Paid Check Total 2,335.87 2,335.87 514.50 514.50 -1,511.63 1,567.18 55.55 2,405.00 2,405.00 195.34 195.34 279.96 279.96 259.17 259.17 200.00 200.00 129.28 129.28 204.45 204.45 64.85 34.84 99.69 578.70 578.70 328.50 328.50 1,428.00 1,428.00 1,214.01 1,214.01 42.48 42.48 Page:3 apChkLst 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 205363 4/8/2021 012600 DAVID EVANS AND JAN DSGN SVCS: PW17-29 WTR 334.53 ASSOCIATES INC CONVERSION FEB DSGN SVCS: RRSP EXPANSION 18-1 1,642.00 JAN DSGN SVCS: SAM HICKS PARK: PW 1,143.00 FEB DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ PW17-� 26,921.13 30,040.66 205364 4/8/2021 019720 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES APR WTR QUALITY MAINT:DUCK 6,969.00 6,969.00 INC PND/HARV. 205365 4/8/2021 021855 ECONNECT INC THERMAL TEMP SCANNERS: COVID-19 7,700.00 7,700.00 205366 4/8/2021 000164 ESGIL LLC FEB PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV DEPT 14,993.86 JAN PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV DEPT 8,195.69 23,189.55 205367 4/8/2021 015330 FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL, OF MAR CDBG SUB -RECIPIENT: FAIR 1,926.74 1,926.74 RIVERSIDE COUNTY INC HOUSING SVC 205368 4/8/2021 022504 FITZGERALD-SWEET, FERN RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 15,000.00 15,000.00 205369 4/8/2021 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC SUPPLIES: 55.79 THEATER SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC SUPPLIES: TH 2O0.84 256.63 205370 4/8/2021 010452 GAYLORD BROS INC MISC SUPPLIES TVM /ACE: TCSD 14.34 14.34 205371 4/8/2021 019721 GOVCONNECTION INC TELECONFERENCING EQUIP: PD MALL 1,021.51 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT: INFO TECH 38,443.13 COMPUTER REPLACEMENT: INFO TECH 1,800.00 WEBCAMS: INFO TECH 9,324.22 50,588.86 205372 4/8/2021 003792 GRAINGER MISC TOOLS: PW PARKS 40.12 MISC TOOLS: PW PARKS 1,818.29 1,858.41 205374 4/8/2021 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC 74.77 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT 852.23 HDWR SUPPLIES:GRAFFITI ABATEMENT 111.75 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC 68.23 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PW PARKS 254.19 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM 100.98 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PARKS 4,146.82 MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES - FIRE DEPT 356.39 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 35.69 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: FACILITIES/FIRE 3,070.86 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TPL 795.69 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 92.57 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: THEATER 312.16 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: VARI FACILITIES 3,549.26 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 363.62 14,185.21 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205375 4/8/2021 020193 HD SUPPLY CONSTR SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW LTD, DBA HDS WHITE CAP CONSTR Amount Paid Check Total 48.81 205376 4/8/2021 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & 3RD QTR MEASURE S SALES TAX 4,578.05 ASSOC AUDIT SVCS 205377 4/8/2021 003198 HOME DEPOT MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 75.60 SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 194.66 MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 391.30 MISC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 535.79 205378 4/8/2021 018184 INLAND VLY BUS & COMM EXPENSES: VIDEO PRODUCTION: '20 2,500.00 FNDTN, DBA TEDX TEMECULA CONF 205379 4/8/2021 006924 INTL MUNICIPAL SIGNAL IMSAAGENCY MEMBERSHIP: PW 425.00 ASSOC, IMSA 205380 4/8/2021 021896 JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA BUSINESS CARDS - STA 73 81.56 MINUTEMAN PRESS 205381 4/8/2021 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA ENGRAVING SVCS: HR 53.29 TEMECULA TROPHY& DES CREDIT: -13.32 205382 4/8/2021 019691 L C PAVING AND SEALING INC REL STP NTC: SUPERIOR PAVEMENT: 62,830.00 PW15-14 RET RELEASE: PECHANGA PKWY: 15-14 100,751.51 STP NTC: SUPERIOR PAVEMENT: PW15-14 -62,830.00 205383 4/8/2021 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA MISC SIGNS: HOMELESS 2,332.95 ATHACOINC ENCAMPMENT CITY STREET SIGNAGE: PW STREET MAINT 272.44 205384 4/8/2021 021343 MILLER ARCHITECTURAL FEB ARCHITECTURAL SVCS: MPSC 4,900.00 CORP RENOVATION 205385 4/8/2021 022502 MOREHOUSE, MADELINE RELEASE CLAIMS AGREEMENT PMT 9,000.00 205386 4/8/2021 000209 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC, EQUUIPMENT REPAIR & MAIN - 10.92 DBA CROP PRODUCTION STATION 12 SRVCS EQPMNT REPAIR & MAIN - FIRE STA 12 164.93 205387 4/8/2021 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 104.00 OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 205388 4/8/2021 012818 PLANETBIDS INC ONLINE BID SYSTEM RENEWAL: INFO 28,674.00 TECH 48.81 4,578.05 1,197.35 2,500.00 425.00 81.56 39.97 100,751.51 2,605.39 4,900.00 9,000.00 175.85 104.00 28,674.00 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205389 4/8/2021 021026 QUESTICA LTD MAR SOFTWARE & REPORTS: FINANCE 205390 4/8/2021 022494 REVZILLA MOTORSPORTS LLC, MOTOR BOOTS: TEM SHERIFF DBA REVZILLA.COM 205391 4/8/2021 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD ADD'L DEPOSITWURR CRK CONTROL AND, WATER ENCROACH PERMIT CONSERVATION DIST 205392 4/8/2021 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC YELLOW TRAFFIC PAINT: PW STREETS 205393 4/8/2021 000277 S ANDS WORLDWIDE INC ART/CRAFT SUPPLIES: SMR DAY CAMP 205394 4/8/2021 022051 SINGH GROUP INC HOMELESS ENCMPMNT CLEANUP 3/18-19 205395 4/8/2021 020545 SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP MAR HOMELESS OUTREACH SRVCS: TCSD 205396 4/8/2021 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST MAR PEST CONTROL SRVCS: STA 95 CONTROL INC 205397 4/8/2021 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, APR GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,2593,9306 TELEPHONE COMPANY 205398 4/8/2021 004282 SOUTHWEST TRAFFIC MISC TRAFFIC PARTS: PW TRAFFIC SYSTEMS 205399 4/8/2021 015648 STEIN ANDREW, DBA PARKINK STEP INTO SPRING PROMO ITEMS: CRC 205400 4/8/2021 022473 T AND G GLOBAL LLC, DBA ST. ARTIFICIAL TREE: OLD TOWN HOLIDAY NICK'S 205401 4/8/2021 017796 TAKKTAMERICAN HOLDING, GIFT SHOP MISC SUPPLIES: T. INC, SPG US RETAIL MUSEUM RESOURCELL 205402 4/8/2021 018174 VCA PET MEDICAL CENTER, VETERINARY SERVICES: POLICE DBA VCAANIMAL HOSPITALS 205403 4/8/2021 007987 WALMART MISC SUPPLIES T. MUSEUM 205404 4/8/2021 001881 WATER SAFETY PRODUCTS POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS INC POOL SUPPLIES: AQUATICS Amount Paid Check Total 550.00 550.00 323.20 323.20 1,000.00 1,000.00 4,326.25 4,326.25 2,657.05 2,657.05 5,712.00 5,712.00 31,843.12 31,843.12 80.00 80.00 613.07 613.07 10,676.53 10,676.53 3,347.27 3,347.27 33,825.80 33,825.80 258.85 258.85 682.02 682.02 16.27 16.27 265.89 88.09 353.98 Page.-6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 205405 4/8/2021 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: CITY FACS 205406 4/8/2021 008668 WES FLOWERS SUNSHINE FUND 205407 4/8/2021 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: PARKS & MEDIANS 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: WOLF CREEK SLOPI 2/16-28 TREE TRIMMING: PARKS & MEDI. 1/1-15 TREE MAINT: RANCHO HIGHLAND 2/16-28 TREE TRIMMING: WOLF CRK SL( 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: HARVESTON LK PRF 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: CROWNE HILL SLOF 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: OLD TOWN MAINT 01/16-31/21 TREE MAINT: VINTAGE HILL 3/1-15 TREE MAINT: CITY R-O-W 205408 4/8/2021 000339 WEST PUBLISHING MAR CLEAR SUBSCRIPTION: POLICE CORPORATION, DBA:THOMSON REUTERS 205409 4/8/2021 021148 WEX BANK 3/5-4/6 FUEL USAGE: POLICE 205410 4/8/2021 008530 WITMER PUBLIC SAFETY EMERG OXYGEN EQUIP: AQUATICS GROUP INC 205411 4/8/2021 003776 ZOLL MEDICAL CORPORATION, AED REPLACEMENT: MEDIC GPO 1002079 4/1/2021 022507 RIVERSIDE SYSTEM DESIGNS REFUND: F21-1093 PERMIT NOT INC REQUIRED 1002080 4/1/2021 004498 SIEMENS INDUSTRY, INC. REFUND: FOR PLAN CHECK FEES F20-4526 Amount Paid Check Total 777.93 99.49 1,420.10 11, 619.00 1,265.55 458.85 8,637.65 1,613.65 464.95 1,226.45 820.50 574.35 937.65 1,568.03 595.79 19,427.25 1,012.00 173.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 777.93 99.49 28,101.05 937.65 1,568.03 595.79 19,427.25 1,012.00 173.00 496,840.83 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 04/08/2021 4:12:29PM CITY OF TEMECULA 95 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 496,840.83 Page:8 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. 2021-03 Amending Chapter 15.10 to Update the Local Development Mitigation Fee for Funding the Preservation of Natural Ecosystems in Accordance with the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP") (Long Range Project No. LR21-0392) (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10, MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION MITIGATION FEE, OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the City Council present. Ordinance No. 2021-03 was first introduced at a noticed public hearing at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 13, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO.2021-03 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.10, MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION MITIGATION FEE, OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT MITIGATION FEE FOR FUNDING THE PRESERVATION OF NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 15.10, Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Mitigation Fee, is hereby amended to read as follows: CHAPTER 15.10 MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION MITIGATION FEE 15.10.020 Findings. In adopting this chapter, the city council finds and determines that: A. The ecosystems of the City and western Riverside County, and the vegetation communities and sensitive species they support are fragile, irreplaceable resources that are vital to the general welfare of all residents. B. These vegetation communities and natural areas contain habitat value which contributes to the City's and the region's environmental resources. C. Special protections for these vegetation communities and natural areas are being established to prevent future endangerment of the plant and animal species that are dependent upon them. D. Adoption and implementation of this Chapter will help to enable the City to achieve the conservation goals set forth in the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"), adopted by the City Council on December 16, 2003, to implement the associated Implementing Agreement, executed by the City Council on December 16, 2003, and to preserve the ability of affected property owners to make reasonable use of their land consistent with the requirements of the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA"), the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the Federal Endangered Species Act ("FESA"), the California Endangered Species Act ("CESA"), the California Natural Community Conservation Planning Act ("NCCP Act"), and other applicable laws. E. The purpose and intent of this Chapter is to update its Local Development Mitigation Fee to assist in the maintenance of biological diversity and the natural ecosystem processes that support this diversity; the protection of vegetation communities and natural areas within the City and western Riverside County which are known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species; the maintenance of economic development within the City by providing a streamlined regulatory process from which development can proceed in an orderly process; and the protection of the existing character of the City and the region through the implementation of a system of reserves which will provide for permanent open space, community edges, and habitat conservation for species covered by the MSHCP. F. The Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority ("RCA") has prepared an updated nexus study entitled "WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN NEXUS FEE STUDY UPDATE" (2020 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government code sections 66000 et seq. for the purpose of updating the Local Development Mitigation Fee ("LDMF"). On December 7, 2020, the RCA Board of Directors reviewed the 2020 Nexus Study and directed RCA Permittees to adopt this updated MSHCP fee Chapter. G. The findings set forth herein are based on the MSHCP and the 2020 Nexus Study, and the estimated implementation costs of the MSHCP as set forth in the 2020 Nexus Study, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's office; H. Pursuant to Article 11, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City is authorized to enact measures that protect the health, safety, and welfare of its citizens; I. Pursuant to Government Code sections 66000 et seq., the City is empowered to impose fees and other exactions to provide necessary funding and public facilities required to mitigate the negative effect of new development projects; J. On December 16, 2003 the City Council took action on the MSHCP and the associated Implementing Agreement and adopted the original LDMF, and made appropriate findings pursuant to CEQA; K. The levying of LDMF has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that the adoption of this Chapter is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines; and L. Pursuant to Government Code sections 66016, 66017, and 66018, the City has: (a) made available to the public, at least ten (10) days prior to its public hearing, data indicating the estimated cost required to provide the facilities and infrastructure for which these development fees are levied and the revenue sources anticipated to provide those facilities and infrastructure; (b) mailed notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to this meeting to all interested parties that have requested notice of new or increased development fees; and (c) held a duly noticed, regularly N scheduled public hearing on April 13, 2021 at which public comments were received regarding the proposed fee. M. The preservation of vegetation communities and natural areas within the City and western Riverside County which support species covered by the MSHCP is necessary to protect and promote the health, safety, and welfare of all the citizens of the City by reducing the adverse direct, indirect, and cumulative effects of urbanization and development and providing for permanent conservation of habitat for species covered by the MSHCP. N. It is necessary to update certain development impact fees to ensure that all new development within the City pays its fair share of the costs of acquiring and preserving vegetation communities and natural areas within the City and the region which are known to support plant and wildlife species covered by the MSHCP. O. A proper funding source to pay the costs associated with mitigating the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of development to the natural ecosystems within the City and the region, as identified in the MSHCP, is a development impact fee for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The amount of the fee is determined by the nature and extent of the impacts from the development to the identified natural ecosystems and or the relative cost of mitigating such impacts. P. The MSHCP and the 2020 Nexus Study provide a basis for the imposition of development impact fees on new construction. Q. The use of the development impact fees to mitigate the impacts to the City's and the region's natural ecosystems is reasonably related to the type and extent of impacts caused by development within the City. R. The costs of funding the proper mitigation of natural ecosystems and biological resources impacted by development within the City and the region are apportioned relative to the type and extent of impacts caused by the development. S. The facts and evidence provided to the City establish that there is a reasonable relationship between the need for preserving the natural ecosystems in the City and the region, as defined in the MSHCP, and the direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts to such natural ecosystems and biological resources created by the types of development on which the fee will be imposed, and that there is a reasonable relationship between the fee's use and the types of development for which the fee is charged. This reasonable relationship is described in more detail in the MSHCP and the 2020 Nexus Study. T. The cost estimates for mitigating the impact of development on the City's and the region's natural ecosystem and biological resources, as set forth in the MSHCP, are reasonable and will not exceed the reasonably estimated total of these costs. U. The fee set forth herein does not reflect the entire cost of the lands which need to be acquired in order to implement the MSHCP and mitigate the impact caused by new development. Additional revenues will be required from other sources. The City Council finds that the benefit to each development project is greater than the amount of the fee to be paid by the project. V. The fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be used to finance the acquisition and perpetual conservation of the natural ecosystems and certain improvements necessary to implement the goals and objectives of the MSHCP. 15.10.030 Administrative Responsibility. The RCA is hereby reaffirmed as the Administrator of this Chapter. The RCA is hereby authorized to receive all fees generated from the Local Development Mitigation Fee within the City, and to invest, account for, and expend such fees in accordance with the provisions of the MSHCP, MSHCP Implementing Chapter, this Chapter, and the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. The detailed administrative procedures concerning the implementation of this Chapter shall be contained in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual adopted December 7, 2020 and as may be amended from time to time. The RCA Board of Directors may adopt a policy that will allow the City to authorize the RCA to calculate the fees due and collect those amounts directly from property owners. If such a policy is adopted, it will be included in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. 15.10.040 Definitions. As used in this Chapter, the following terms shall have the following meanings: "Accessory Dwelling Unit" means an accessory dwelling unit as defined by California Government Code section 65852.20)(1), or as defined in any successor statute. "City" means the City of Temecula, California. "City Council" means the City Council of the City of Temecula, California. "Credit" means a credit allowed pursuant to 15.10.110 of this Chapter, which may be applied against the development impact fee paid. "Development" means a human -created change to improved or unimproved real estate, including buildings or other structures, mining, dredging, filing, grading, paving, excavating, and drilling. "Development Project" or "Project" means any project undertaken for the purpose of development pursuant to the issuance of a building permit by the City pursuant to all applicable Chapters, regulations, and rules of the City and state law. "Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit" means a junior accessory dwelling unit as defined by California Government Code section 65852.22(h)(1), or as defined in any successor statute. "Local Development Mitigation Fee" or "Fee" means the development impact fee imposed pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter. "Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan" or "MSHCP" means the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, adopted by the City Council on December 16, 2003. "MSHCP Conservation Area" has the same meaning and intent as such term is defined and utilized in the MSHCP. "Project Area" means the area, measured in acres, within the Development Project including, without limitation, any areas to be developed as a condition of the Development Project. Except as otherwise provided herein, the Project Area is the area upon which the project will be assessed the Local Development Mitigation Fee. See the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual for additional guidance for calculating the Project Area. "Revenue" or "Revenues" means any funds received by the City pursuant to the provisions of this Chapter for the purpose of defraying all or a portion of the cost of acquiring and preserving vegetation communities and natural areas within the City and the region which are known to support threatened, endangered, or key sensitive populations of plant and wildlife species. "Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority" or "RCA" means the governing body established pursuant to the MSHCP that is delegated the authority to oversee and implement the provisions of the MSHCP. Any capitalized term not otherwise defined herein shall carry the same meaning and definition as that term is used and defined in the MSHCP. 15.10.050 Local Development Mitigation and Local Infrastructure Fee. A. Adoption of Local Development Mitigation Fee Schedule. The City Council shall adopt an applicable Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule provided by the RCA through a separate resolution, which may be amended from time to time. B. Public Projects. The City is required to mitigate the impacts of Public Projects pursuant to the MSHCP and the MSHCP Implementing Agreement. The definition of Public Project and the method for mitigating Public Projects will be set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. C. Periodic Fee Adjustment. The Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule set forth in the fee resolution referenced above may be periodically reviewed and the amounts adjusted as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. D. Automatic Annual Fee Adjustment. In addition to the Periodic Fee Adjustment mentioned above, the RCA shall provide the City with an automatic annual fee adjustment for the Local Development Mitigation Fee established by this Chapter as set forth in the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. 15.10.060 Imposition of The Local Development Mitigation Fee. A. The Local Development Mitigation Fee will be paid no later than at the issuance of a building permit. Notwithstanding any other provision of the City's Municipal Code, no building permit shall be issued for any Development Project unless the Local Development Mitigation Fee applicable to such Development Project has been paid. The amount of the Fee shall be calculated in accordance with the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. B. In lieu of the payment of the Local Development Mitigation Fee as provided above, the Fee for a Development may be paid through a Community Facilities District, provided that such arrangement is approved by the RCA in writing. 15.10.070 Payment of Local Development Mitigation Fee. A. The Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be paid in full in accordance with applicable law. B. The Local Development Mitigation Fee required to be paid under this Chapter shall be the fee in effect at the time the permit is issued for which the Local Development Mitigation Fee is assessed; provided, however, that Housing Development Projects as defined by California Government Code section 65589.5(h)(2) may be entitled to pay the fee in effect at the time of the preliminary application was submitted. C. Notwithstanding anything in the City's Municipal Code, or any other written documentation to the contrary, the Local Development Mitigation Fee shall be paid whether or not the Development Project is subject to conditions of approval by the City imposing the requirement to pay the fee. D. If all or part of the Development Project is sold prior to payment of the Local Development Mitigation Fee, the Project shall continue to be subject to the requirement to pay the fee as provided herein. E. The fee title owner(s) of the Property is responsible for the payment of the Local Development Mitigation Fee. 15.10.080 Refunds. Under certain circumstances, such as double payment, expiration of a building permit, or fee miscalculation due to clerical error, an applicant may be entitled to a refund. Refunds will be reimbursed by the end of the fiscal year on a first come, first served basis, depending upon the net revenue stream. Refunds will only be considered reimbursable if requested within 3 years of the original LDMF payment. In all cases, the applicant must promptly submit a refund request with proof of LDMF payment to the RCA if RCA collected the LDMF, or if collected by a local jurisdiction, the refund request shall be submitted to that local jurisdiction, which will subsequently forward the request to RCA for verification, review, and possible action. A. Expiration of Building Permits. If a building permit should expire, is revoked, or is voluntarily surrendered and is, therefore voided and no construction or improvement of land has commenced, then the applicant may be entitled to a refund of the LDMF collected which was paid as a condition of approval, less administration costs. Any refund must be requested within three (3) years of the original payment. The applicant shall pay the current LDMF in effect at the time in full if s/he reapplies for the permit. B. Double Payments. On occasion due to a clerical error, a developer has paid all or a portion of the required LDMF for project twice. In such cases, a refund of the double payment may be required. C. Balance Due. When LDMF is incorrectly calculated due to City clerical error, it is the City's responsibility to remit the balance due to RCA. The error must be discovered within three (3) years of the original payment for the City to be held accountable. The amount due can be remitted through alternate methods agreed to by the RCA Executive Committee. If first approved through RCA staff in writing, the calculation is not subject to additional review. 15.10.090 Accounting and Disbursement of Collected Local Development Mitigation Fees. A. All fees paid pursuant to this Chapter shall be deposited, invested, accounted for, and expended in accordance with Section 66006 of the Government Code and all other applicable provisions of law. B. Subject to the provisions of this section, all fees collected pursuant to this Chapter shall be remitted to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority at least quarterly. C. In the resolution mentioned in Section 15.10.050, the City may also add an additional cost to the Local Development Mitigation Fee schedule to cover the costs of collecting the fees from project proponents. Any amounts collected by the City shall not reduce the amount collected and remitted to the RCA under this Chapter. 15.10.100 Exemptions. The following types of construction shall be exempt from the provisions of this Chapter: A. Reconstruction or improvements that were damaged or destroyed by fire or other natural causes, provided that the reconstruction or improvements do not result in additional usable square footage. B. Rehabilitation or remodeling to an existing Development Project, provided that the rehabilitation or remodeling does not result in additional usable square footage. C. Accessory Dwelling Units, but only to the extent such fee is exempted under state law. D. Junior Accessory Dwelling Units, but only to the extent such fee is exempted under state law. E. Existing structures where the use is changed from an existing permitted use to a different permitted use, provided that no additional improvements are constructed and does not result in additional usable square footage. F. Certain Agricultural Operations as allowed by the MSHCP, as amended. G. Vesting Tentative Tract Maps entered into pursuant to Government Code section 66452 et seq. (also, Government Code section 66498.1 et seq.) and Development Projects which are the subject of a development agreement entered into pursuant to Government Code section 65864 et seq., prior to the effective date of Ordinance No. 03-14, wherein the imposition of new fees are expressly prohibited, provided that if the term of such a vesting map or development agreement is extended by amendment or by any other manner after the effective date of Ordinance No. 03-14, the MSHCP Fee shall be imposed. Except as exempted above, all projects are required to make a mitigation payment/ contribution and where no mitigation payment process is specified, the project will pay the updated per acre mitigation fee. 15.10.110 Fee Credits. Any Local Development Mitigation Fee credit that may be applicable to a Development Project shall be determined by the City and approved by the RCA. All Fee Credits shall comply with the resolutions, ordinances, Implementing Agreement, and policies of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority including, without limitation, the MSHCP Mitigation Fee Implementation Manual. Section 2. Severability. This Ordinance and the various parts, sections, and clauses thereof, are hereby declared to be severable. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance shall be affected thereby. If any part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Ordinance, or its application to any person entity is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid, such unconstitutionality or invalidity shall affect only such part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Ordinance, or person or entity; and shall not affect or impair any of the remaining provision, parts, sentences, paragraphs, sections, or clauses of this Ordinance, or its application to other persons or entities. The City Council hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been adopted had such unconstitutional or invalid part, sentence, paragraph, section, or clause of this Ordinance not been included herein; or had such person or entity been expressly exempted from the application of this Ordinance. Section 3. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby finds that in accordance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines the adoption of this Ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 21080(b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines. Section 4. Ordinance Superseded. This Ordinance supersedes the provisions of Ordinance No. 03-14, establishing the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Fee and this Chapter, 8 provided this Ordinance is not declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction. If, for whatever reason, this Ordinance is declared invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, Ordinance No. 03-14, and all other related ordinances and policies shall remain in full force and effect. Section 5. Certification and Publication. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be published or posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of April, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Mayor 01 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2021-03 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 13th day of April, 2021, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 10 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached Financial Statements reflect the unaudited activity of the City for the 1 st quarter ended September 30, 2020. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2020 2. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance -Budget and Actual for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 (General Fund, Special Revenue Funds, Capital Improvement Fund, Debt Service Fund) 3. Combining Statement of Net Position as of September 30, 2020 4. Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Net Position for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 (Internal Service Funds) 5. Statement of Net Position - Fiduciary Fund California Employee Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) Fund and Pension Rate Stabilization Fund as of September 30, 2020 6. Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position — Fiduciary Fund (CERBT) and Pension Rate Stabilization Fund for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 CITY OF TEMECULA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET As of September 30, 2020 Streets Uptown General Measure S State Gas Road Maintenance Maintenance Temecula New Fund Fund Tax Fund Rehabilitation Act Fund Streets In Lieu Fees ASSETS: Cash and Investments $ 32,475,087 $ 13,236,592 $ 548 $ 1,650,893 $ 1,456,189 $ 891,844 Receivables 11,749,801 5,170,981 231,792 193,055 3,549 2,175 Due from Other Funds 642,293 - - - - Advances to SARDA - - Deposits 1,325 Inventory 3,058 Land Held for Resale - - - - - TOTAL ASSETS $ 44,871,564 $ 18,407,573 $ 232,340 $ 1,843,948 $ 1,459,738 $ 894,019 LIABILITIES: Due to Other Funds $ - $ - $ 231,161 $ - $ - $ - Other Current Liabilities 12,868,169 - TOTAL LIABILITIES 12,868,169 231,161 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES: Unavailable Revenues 1,010,867 - TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 1,010,867 FUND BALANCES: Nonspendable: Deposits 1,325 Inventory 3,058 Land Held for Resale - Restricted For: Community Development Projects - Capital Projects 1,843,948 Public Education - - - - Public Works 1,179 1,459,738 894,019 Reward - - - - Committed To: Contractual Obligation - Encumbrances 3,742,089 Economic Uncertainty (20%) 14,006,770 Secondary Reserve (5%) 3,501,693 Assigned To: Capital Projects 2,100,000 Pechanga-funded Police support 326,810 Unrealized Gains 56,910 - Unassigned 7,253,873 18,407,573 - - - TOTAL FUND BALANCES 30,992,528 18,407,573 1,179 1,843,948 1,459,738 894,019 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, and FUND BALANCES $ 44,871,564 $ 18,407,573 $ 232,340 $ 1,843,948 $ 1,459,738 $ 894,019 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET As of September 30, 2020 Assembly Public Community Temecula Bill2766 Supplemental Development Education & Development Energy Motor Law Cares Act Impact Fund Government Block Grant Efficiency Vehicle Enforcement Fund Fund Asset Team Subvention Services Fund Fund ASSETS: Cash and Investments $ 691,254 $ 2,879,031 $ 427,854 $ 481,504 $ 198,174 $ 36,461 $ - Receivables - 12,774 35,550 - 533 358 106,311 Due from Other Funds - - - - - Advances to SARDA Deposits Inventory Land Held for Resale - - - - - - - TOTAL ASSETS $ 691,254 $ 2,891,805 $ 463,404 $ 481,504 $ 198,707 $ 36,819 $ 106,311 LIABILITIES: Due to Other Funds $ - $ - $ - $ 306,522 $ - $ 21,667 $ 106,311 Other Current Liabilities 17,659 444 23,114 - - TOTAL LIABILITIES - 17,659 444 329,636 21,667 106,311 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES: Unavailable Revenues 691,254 - - 151,868 - - TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 691,254 151,868 FUND BALANCES: Nonspendable: Deposits - - Inventory Land Held for Resale Restricted For: Community Development Projects - Capital Projects 2,874,146 - 15,152 Public Education - 462,960 - Public Works - 198,707 Reward - Committed To: Contractual Obligation - Encumbrances Economic Uncertainty (20%) Secondary Reserve (5%) Assigned To: Capital Projects Pechanga-funded Police support Unrealized Gains Unassigned - - - - TOTAL FUND BALANCES - 2,874,146 462,960 198,707 15,152 - TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, and FUND BALANCES $ 691,254 $ 2,891,805 $ 463,404 $ 481,504 $ 198,707 $ 36,819 $ 106,311 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA COMBINING BALANCE SHEET As of September 30, 2020 Temecula Financing Major Affordable Measure A Capital Project Lease Civic Financing Crimes Housing Fund Fund Center and Lease MRC TOTAL Reward Fund CRC Fund ASSETS: Cash and Investments $ 27,092 $ 1,919,360 $ 7,729,748 $ 16,631,048 $ $ $ 80,732,679 Receivables 73 28,668,285 920,468 3,170,660 50,266,365 Due from Other Funds - - - 23,259 665,552 Advances to SARDA 5,250,954 - 5,250,954 Deposits - 1,325 Inventory - 3,058 Land Held for Resale 4,400,388 - - 4,400,388 TOTAL ASSETS $ 27,165 $ 40,238,987 $ 8,650,216 $ 19,824,967 $ $ $ 141,320,321 LIABILITIES: Due to Other Funds $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ 665,661 Other Current Liabilities 19,108 738,840 1,770,812 15,438,146 TOTAL LIABILITIES 19,108 738,840 1,770,812 16,103,807 DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES: Unavailable Revenues 28,350,604 - 3,120,779 33,325,372 TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES 28,350,604 3,120,779 33,325,372 FUND BALANCES: Nonspendable: Deposits - - 1,325 Inventory - 3,058 Land Held for Resale 4,400,388 4,400,388 Restricted For: Community Development Projects 7,468,887 - 7,468,887 Capital Projects - 7,911,376 12,644,622 Public Education - 462,960 Public Works 2,553,643 Reward 27,165 27,165 Committed To: Contractual Obligation - Encumbrances - 3,742,089 Economic Uncertainty (20%) 14,006,770 Secondary Reserve (5%) - 3,501,693 Assigned To: Capital Projects 14,933,376 17,033,376 Pechanga-funded Police support - 326,810 Unrealized Gains 56,910 Unassigned - - 25,661,446 TOTAL FUND BALANCES 27,165 11,869,275 7,911,376 14,933,376 91,891,142 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, and FUND BALANCES $ 27,165 $ 40,238,987 $ 8,650,216 $ 19,824,967 $ - $ - $ 141,320,321 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERALFUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: Sales Tax Sales Tax Sharing Agreement Franchise Fees Motor Vehicle In Lieu Property Tax- Secured/Unsecured Property Tax in Lieu of VLF Property Tax Relief (Homeowner) Property Transfer Tax Residual RPTTF Distribution Transient Occupancy Tax Vehicle Code Fines Development Services: Building & Safety Fire Land Development Planning Park Maintenance Public Works Police Bids and Proposals Business Licenses Investment Interest Lease Income Miscellaneous Rental Income Right of Way Advertising AB1379 Collection State Fee/SB1186 State Fee Operating Transfers In Measure S SLESF State Gas Tax Reimbursements: CIP Mandated Cost Pechanga IGA Other TOTALREVENUES Annual Total Percentage of Amended Activity Budget Budget $ 33,054,736 $ 9,809,825 30% (1,597,814) (303,785) 19% 3,381,908 1,031,308 30% 55,415 - 0% 7,871,976 458,557 6% 8,745,321 - 0% 86,383 - 0% 318,778 232,891 73% 102,000 - 0% 3,181,349 560,961 18% 521,839 67,806 13% 1,595,275 459,620 29% 811,415 206,900 25% 578,922 150,425 26% 670,502 148,002 22% 1,948,711 16,612 1 % - 91,954 100% 438,745 102,320 23% 800 - 0% 255,000 19,905 8% 82,300 (33,655) -41% 7,500 1,875 25% 15,170 4,214 28% 143,028 12,961 9% 20,880 6,420 31 % 29,140 1,761 6% 8,944,780 2,236,195 25% 172,507 203,676 118% 2,418,092 785,700 32% 2,435,827 523,620 21% 29,000 44,532 154% 356,567 - 0% 146,974 380 0% $ 76,823,026 $ 16,840,980 22% Notes: (1) The Motor Vehicle In Lieu revenues are scheduled to be received in December of this fiscal year. (2) Property Tax revenues are scheduled to be received in January and May of this fiscal year. (3) The variance is due to greater property sales than expected during the pandemic period. (4) The variance is due to lower occupancy and decreased rates, as well as tax delinquencies, during the pandemic period. (5) Special assessment taxes for Park Maintenance are schedule to be received in January and May of this fiscal year. (6) Reimbursements received from FEMA and Cal-OES for the 2019 Storm Emergency Event. (7) The annual business license renewal cyle will primarily start in January 2021. (8) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (9) The variance is due to rent deferrals for CONVIS. (10) Fees will be received during the annual business license renewal cycle in January 2021. (11) Pechanga IGA revenue is scheduled to be received in May 2021. (1) (2) (2) (2) (3) (2) (4) IM STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL GENERALFUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Year -to -Date Year -to -Date Percentage Amended Activity Encumbrances Activity and of Budget Budget Encumbrances EXPENDITURES: City Council $ 584,784 $ 155,120 $ 564 $ 155,684 27% Community Support 125,000 - - - 0% City Manager 1,565,398 384,734 59,745 444,479 28% Economic Development 1,717,854 530,079 184,839 714,918 42% Emergency Management 119,571 181,044 - 181,044 151% City Clerk 1,336,985 300,426 95,986 396,412 30% City Attorney 961,146 93,006 - 93,006 10% Finance 2,570,422 628,940 143,819 772,759 30% Human Resources 1,035,192 233,156 61,635 294,791 28% Planning 2,955,737 620,544 307,429 927,973 31% Building & Safety 3,338,105 784,150 199,054 983,204 29% Land Development 1,796,617 413,014 71,886 484,900 27% Public Works 5,930,776 1,142,195 367,052 1,509,247 25% CIP Administration 2,400,265 634,950 27,729 662,679 28% Parks Maintenance 3,950,446 1,034,224 1,463,875 2,498,099 63% Police 36,314,935 7,879,109 258,423 8,137,532 22% Fire 10,230,872 2,308,215 181,192 2,489,407 24% Animal Control 500,958 182,096 318,861 500,957 100% Non Departmental Property Tax Admin 88,095 - - - 0% Retiree Medical Contribution 1,000,000 219,336 219,336 22% PERS Replacement Benefit 99,434 - - - 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES (excluding transfers) 78,622,592 17,724,338 3,742,089 21,466,427 27% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Operating Transfer Out 2018 Financing Lease (Civic Center) 2018 Financing Lease (MRC) Total Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 (1,799,566) (883,358) (2,077,767) (518,612) (555,808) (138,952) (2,633,575) (657,564) (4,433,141) (1,540,922) 32,533,450 32,533,450 $ 28,100,309 $ 30,992,528 IE (2) (3) (4) Notes: (1) Distribution of Community Service Funding to start in December 2020. (2) Economic Development's budget variance is due to the $171,000 in Temecula Assist grants paid out to recipients in the 1st quarter. (3) Emergency Management expenditures exceeded budget due to purchased of equipment to assist the City in providing virtual services, as a result of the pandemic. (4) The variance for City Attorney expenditures on litigation/legal support is due to less activity than anticipated. (5) The variance in Parks Maintenance and Animal Control is due to encumbrances that are recorded for the entire fiscal year. (6) Property Tax Admin fees are expected to be paid in January 2021 when Property Tax revenues are received. (7) The payment to CALPERS for employee replacement benefit will be paid by the end of this fiscal year. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL MEASURE S FUND for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total Percentage of Amended Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: Measure S (Transactions and Use Tax) $ 28,091,029 $ 7,672,546 27% Investment Interest 40,800 19,929 49% TOTAL REVENUES 28,131,829 7,692,475 27% Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating Transfers In - - 0% Operating Transfers Out: General Fund (9,074,493) (2,236,195) 25% Information Technology (260,000) (65,000) 25% Facility Replacement (500,000) (125,000) 25% TCSD Operations (8,297,243) (2,074,311) 25% TCSD Service Level B (73,168) (18,292) 25% Library Services (847,181) (211,795) 25% Capital Improvement Program (15,798,331) 0% Total Transfers Out (34,850,416) (4,730,593) 14% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) (6,718,587) 2,961,882 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 15,445,691 15,445,691 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 8,727,104 $ 18,407,573 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (2) Transfers to CIP will occur as the projects are expended. Im (2) CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL STATE GAS TAX FUND for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total Percentage Budget Activity of Budget REVENUES: Section 2103 - 2107 Investment Interest TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfers Out - General Fund Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 2,418,092 $ 684,280 28% - 722 100% 2,418,092 685,002 28% 2,418,092 685,002 (2,418,092) (785,700) 32% 101,877 101,877 $ 101,877 $ 1,179 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACl for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total Percentage Amended Activity of Budget Budget REVENUES: RMRA $ 1,827,342 $ 517,650 28% Investment Interest 13,000 1,866 14% (1) TOTAL REVENUES 1,840,342 519,516 28% EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses TOTAL EXPENDITURES - - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 1,840,342 519,516 Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfers Out - CIP (3,097,213) - 0% (2) (3,097,213) Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) (1,256,871) 519,516 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 1,324,432 1,324,432 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 67,561 $ 1,843,948 Note: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (2) Transfers to CIP will occur as project expenditures occur. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total Percentage Budget Activity of Budget REVENUES: Investment Interest $ 12,500 $ 2,197 18% (1) TOTAL REVENUES 12,500 2,197 18% EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfer In - Measure S - - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) 12,500 2,197 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 1,457,541 1,457,541 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 1,470,041 $ 1,459,738 Note: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL UPTOWN TEMECULA NEW STREETS IN LIEU FEES for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total Percentage Budget Activity of Budget REVENUES: Jefferson Street In Lieu Fees 222,718 - 0% Investment Interest $ - $ 1,302 100% TOTAL REVENUES 222,718 1,302 1% EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfer In - Measure S - - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) 222,718 1,302 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 892,717 892,717 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 1,115,435 $ 894,019 Note: (1) The variance is due to the timing of developers pulling building permits. (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CARES ACT for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total Percentage Budget Activity of Budget REVENUES: Grants 691,254 TOTAL REVENUES 691,254 EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses - TOTAL EXPENDITURES Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Transfer Out - General Fund 691,254 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) 1,382,508 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 - Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 1,382,508 $ Note: (1) Additional assist grant funds received for distribution due to COVID-19 Pandemic. (2) Transfer Out to General Fund occurred subsequent to September 30, 2020. 0% 0% 0% (1) CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Budget REVENUES: Open Space $ 123,508 Investment Interest 18,000 Quimby 524,512 Street Improvements 2,516,611 Traffic Signals 360,300 Parks & Recreation 423,726 Corporate Facilities 277,978 Fire Protection 134,481 Library 244,897 Police 131,857 TOTAL REVENUES 4,755,870 EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 4,755,870 Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfers In - Transfers Out (4,625,217) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (4,625,217) Net Change in Fund Balances 130,653 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 2,592,355 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 2,723,008 Total Activity $ 22,636 3,895 8,835 48,365 6,850 77,658 33,298 14,156 55,661 10,437 281,791 Percentage of Budget 18% 22% 2% 2% 2% 18% 12% 11% 23% 8% 6% 0% - 0% 281,791 281,791 2,592,355 $ 2,874,146 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the timing of developers pulling building permits. (2) Transfers to CIP will occur as the projects are expended. 0% 0% 1E (2) CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual YTD Total Percentage of Amended Activity Encumbrances Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: PEG Fees Revenues $ 220,219 $ 34,547 $ - $ 34,547 Investment Interest 2,000 603 TOTAL REVENUES 222,219 35,150 EXPENDITURES: Operating Expenses - Equipment - - TOTAL EXPENDITURES - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures 222,219 35,150 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 427,810 427,810 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 650,029 $ 462,960 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (2) Operating Expenses -projects have been postponed due to the COVID-19 Pandemic. 35,150 16% 30% (1) 16% 0% (2) 0% CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual YTD Percentage of Amended Activity Encumbrances Total Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: Grant Revenue $ 888,063 $ $ $ 0% (1) TOTAL REVENUES 888,063 - 0% EXPENDITURES: Salaries and Wages 111,441 29,534 - 29,534 27% Other Outside Services 477,489 230,655 26,320 256,975 54% (2) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 588,930 260,189 26,320 286,509 44% Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 299,133 (260,189) Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfers In - 324,098 100% (2) Transfers Out (273,904) - Transfers Out - CIP (313,693) - 0% (1) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (587,597) 324,098 Net Change in Fund Balances (288,464) 63,909 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 (63,909) (63,909) Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ (352,373) $ Notes: (1) CDBG Revenue is booked on a reimbursement basis as eligible expenditures occur. (2) The variance in expenditures is due to Temecula Assist Grants (additional grants, due to the COVID-19 Pandemic) which were processed in the 1st quarter. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET MANAGEMENT TEAM for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: Investment Interest TOTALREVENUES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Annual Amended Budget $ 1,300 $ 1,300 Total Percentage of Activity Budget 297 23% (1) 297 23% 1,300 297 198,410 198,410 $ 199,710 $ 198,707 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL ASSEMBLY BILL 2766 MOTOR VEHICLE SUBVENTION FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: AB 2766 Investment Interest TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: Other Outside Services TOTAL EXPENDITURES Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfers Out Net Change in Fund Balances Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Annual Percentage of Amended Total Activity Budget Budget $ 151,870 $ - 1,500 (62) 153,370 (62) 10,200 10,200 143,170 (62) (106,700) - 36,470 (62) 15,214 15,214 $ 51,684 $ 15,152 0% (3) Notes: (1) Variance is due to timing of First Quarter receipts, which are expected to be received in December 2020. (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (3) Transfers Out to CIP will be recorded as Capital Project expenditures occur. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES FUND (SLESF) for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total Percentage of Amended Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: AB 3229 - COPS Investment Interest TOTALREVENUES Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfers Out Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 172,017 $ 203,698 490 131 172,507 203,829 (172,507) (203,829) Notes: (1) The variance is due to adjustments made from prior year allocations. (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (3) Transfers Out reflects the transfer of revenue to the General Fund to support Police activity. (3) CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Percentage of Amended Total Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: Investment Interest TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: Other Outside Services TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 180 $ 41 23% 180 41 23% 180 41 27,124 27,124 $ 27,304 $ 27,165 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. rd CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Contributions to Agency Trust Investment Interest Reimbursements Rental Income TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: OPERATING EXPENDITURES: Salaries & Benefits Operating and Administrative Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Notes Annual YTD Total Percentage Amended Activity Encumbrances Activity of Budget Budget $ 250,000 $ - $ $ - 0% 4,700 2,981 2,981 63% - 1,000 1,000 100% 85,400 - 0% 340,100 3,981 3,981 1% 301,732 72,501 72,501 24% 294,516 19,616 5,076 24,692 8% 596,248 92,117 5,076 97,193 16% (256,148) (88,136) 11,957,411 11,957,411 $ 11,701,263 $ 11,869,275 (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (2) The variance is due to receipt of a non -anticipated tax credit. (3) The variance is due to Temecula Gardens rental invoice, which will be generated in 3rd quarter of fiscal year. (4) The variance is due to lower than anticipated legal services and operating expenditures. (1) (2) (3) (4) CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL MEASURE A FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total Total Percentage Amended Activity Encumbrances Activity of Budget Budget REVENUES: Investment Interest $ 35,800 $ 11,077 $ $ 11,077 31% (1) Measure "A" 2,783,000 896,600 896,600 32% TOTAL REVENUES 2,818,800 907,677 907,677 32% EXPENDITURES: Street Maintenance 3,520,878 737,977 751,901 1,489,878 42% (2) TOTAL EXPENDITURES 3,520,878 737,977 751,901 1,489,878 42% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (702,078) 169,700 Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfers Out (6,347,510) - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) (7,049,588) 169,700 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 7,741,676 7,741,676 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 692,088 $ 7,911,376 Notes: (1) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments and fluctuating interest rates. (2) The variance is due to higher than anticipated Street Maintenance. CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Account Annual Year -to -Date Percentage Number Amended Activity Encumbrances Total Activity of Budget Budget REVENUE: Operating Transfers In Operating Transfers In -Measure S Grants DIF Reimbursements Other Reimbursements CSD Reimbursements TUMF Contributions Graffiti Abatement MSRC Mobile Source Air Review Committee Investment Interest TOTAL REVENUE EXPENDITURES: Pechanga Parkway Environmental 265-516 Pedestrian Signal Equipment Upgrade 265-518 Diaz Road Expansion 265-521 Emergency Vehicle Preemption 265-522 Traffic Cameras Communication Equipment 265-523 Cherry St Ext Murrieta Creek 265-524 Citywide Buffered Bike Lane Striping 265-526 Pechanga Parkway Widening 265-530 Ynez Road Improvements 265-535 Fiber Optic Communication System 265-550 Overland Drive Extension Commerce Center Drive to West of Enterprise Circle) 265-602 Illuminated Street Name Sign Replace 265-603 Nicolas Road Extension & Improvements 265-604 Traffic Signal Park & Ride Access Improv 265-605 1-15 Congestion Relief 265-609 Traffic Signal System Upgrade 265-610 American with Disabilities Act (ADA) Plan 265-612 PW-Roundabout Improvements on Ynez Road 265-613 Medians and Parkway Citywide 265-622 Murrieta Creek Bridge @ Overland 265-648 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Winchester Road 265-650 Pavement Rehabilitation Program - Citywide 265-655 Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange 265-662 Flashing Beacons & Speed Advisory Signs 265-670 $ 53,193,408 $ 964,589 $ $ 964,589 20,873,916 - - 109,738,123 4,295,181 - - 1,588,942 165,024 165,024 11,054,957 - - - 331,096 331,096 178,236 - - 330,036 141,000 - - - 32,763 32,763 201,393,799 1,493,472 1,493,472 188,500 945,485 856,792 105,326 136 577,657 92,527 242,210 924,671 1,202,033 564,175 100,000 11,639,788 999,555 868,524 538,641 269,872 57,668 228,000 1,489,450 385,960 9,717,395 2,961,470 116,963 416 1,848 98,993 15,459 29,688 5,737 36,691 120,032 1,001 21,103 5,339 82,095 45,527 7,449 16,458 16,874 23,165 25,013 387,454 486,447 15,459 155,925 185,613 143,719 143,719 693 693 1,779 7,516 10,281 46,972 583,775 703,807 44,114 44,114 12,820 13,821 1,303,327 1,324,430 - 5,339 49,239 131,334 308,650 354,177 39,326 46,775 2% 0% 0% 0% 10% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 100% 9% 3% 57% 0% 0% 3% 0% 77% 16% 0% 1% 0% 0% 5% 81% 8% 5% 0% 0% 89% 1% 1% 12% 40% CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND (continued) for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Account Annual Year -to -Date Percentage Number Amended Activity Encumbrances Total Activity of Budget Budget EXPENDITURES - cont d: Traffic Signal Equipment Replacement Program -Citywide 265-680 1,294,394 - - - 0% Traffic Signal Installation -Citywide 265-682 912,739 24,408 5,698 30,106 3% PW-Electric Vehicles Charging Station 265-683 69,555 - - - 0% Fire Station 84 Training Room Improvement 265-687 605,622 34,576 62,753 97,329 16% Citywide Street Light Acquisition and LED Retrofit 265-688 465,839 50,722 95,206 145,928 31% Expanded Recycled Water Plant Material Conversion Project 265-689 176,939 121,745 34,364 156,109 88% 1-15 Branding and Visioning- Conceptual Landscape Corridor Plan 265-690 203,739 44,002 102,169 146,171 72% Margarita Recreation Center 265-692 8,157,786 224,346 720,923 945,269 12% Old Town Parking Structure 265-694 856,958 - 26,582 26,582 3% Sidewalks -Old Town Boardwalk Enhancement 265-696 304,170 11,932 26,298 38,230 13% Fire Station 73 Gym Garage 265-697 262,412 31,589 89,717 121,306 46% City Facilities Rehabilitation 265-701 308,786 10,436 29,482 39,918 13% Facilities -Field Operation Center 265-703 130,469 - - - 0% Medians & Ornamental Pedestrian Barriers - Citywide 265-704 385,248 16,081 20,064 36,145 9% Sidewalks -Citywide 265-708 673,664 56,731 48,359 105,090 16% Citywide Surveillance Cameras 265-711 307,582 - 252,230 252,230 82% Bike Lane Trail Prgm Pump Track 265-718 37,961 4,614 3,729 8,343 22% French Valley Pkwy/1-15 Improvements - Phase 1 265-719 172,709 - - - 0% Bike Lane Trail Temecula Creek South Trail 265-720 256,224 19,285 68,163 87,448 34% Sidewalks-DLR Drive 265-721 360,061 23,911 4,930 28,841 8% Butterfield Stage Road Extension, Ph 111 265-723 4,296,263 75,676 376,516 452,192 11% Citywide Financial System Upgrade 265-724 1,313,972 3,389 249,566 252,955 19% French Valley Pkwy/1-15 Improvements - Phase II 265-726 107,149,508 259,105 612,491 871,596 1% French Valley/1-15 Phase III 265-728 99,032 16,637 9,983 26,620 27% Community Recration Center - CRC 265-730 2,084,943 36,097 36,355 72,452 3% Santa Gertrudis Creek, Phase II 265-732 797,909 25,978 447,535 473,513 59% Murrieta Creek Improvements 265-735 725,091 10,591 38,965 49,556 7% Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect 265-739 5,396,285 215,758 5,855 221,613 4% Temecula Park and Ride 265-747 421,966 453 263,268 263,721 62% Fire Station Roripaugh- Phase II 265-753 5,971 - - - 0% Local Roadway Safety Plan 265-755 90,000 0% Sidewalks -Old Town Improvements 265-766 143,121 0% CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FUND (continued) for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Account Annual Amended Year -to -Date Encumbrances Total Activity Percentage Number Budget Activity of Budget EXPENDITURES - cont'd: Sidewalk-Ynez Road 265-775 29,663 0% Utility Undergrounding-Citywide 265-776 155,314 0% Comprehensive General Plan Update 265-777 300,000 - - - 0% City Facility Security 265-779 216,871 1,275 11,868 13,143 6% Bike Lane & Trail Prgm Mini Pump Track 265-781 95,000 445 - 445 0% MP Senior Center Enhancement Renovation 265-782 430,000 - - - 0% Overland Drive Widening 265-783 352,000 11,247 113,587 124,834 35% ADA Compliance Pavement Rehab Prgm 265-784 456,600 32,810 - 32,810 7% Nicolas Road Multi -Use Trail Extension 265-785 450,000 - - - 0% Sport Field Lighting LED Conversion 290-113 222,547 - 122,510 122,510 55% Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation 290-114 953,535 20,493 534,941 555,434 58% Community Recreation Center (CRC) Pool Site Enhancements & Renovations 290-116 - 2,892 - 2,892 0% Community Services Master Plan 290-117 - - 12,704 12,704 0% Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing 290-120 1,752,161 947,087 947,087 54% Children's Museum Enhancement 290-125 235,623 36,746 36,746 16% Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and repair 290-127 1,337,212 19,046 64,601 83,647 6% Parks Improvement Program 290-130 171,914 - 6,138 6,138 4% Sam Hicks Monument Park Playground Enhancement 290-132 201,137 - - 0% Harveston Lake Infrastructure Improvements 290-136 14,291 14,290 14,290 100% Sports Court Resurfacing 290-141 50,000 - - - 0% Temecula Elementary School (TES) Pool 290-143 82,164 717 283 1,000 1% Eagle Soar Splash Pad Control System 290-145 32,413 15,910 - 15,910 49% Ronald H Roberts Temecula Library 290-146 18,287 - - - 0% Library Parking- Phase II 290-153 95,996 7,825 77,765 85,590 89% Public Restroom Renovation=. 290-155 969,312 3,337 9,025 12,362 1% Ronald Reagan Sports Park Channel Silt Removal and Desilting Pond 290-187 27,767 - 25,085 25,085 90% Urban Forest Management Plan 290-204 351,230 - - 0% CRC Splash Pad & Shade Structures 290-205 99,676 98,125 98,125 98% Sam Hicks Monument Park Perimeter Fence 290-220 201,000 - - 0% Tenant Imprvs-Old Town Prkg Structure 299-5213 - 3,663 3,663 0% Affordable Housing Project 815-5804 3,341,940 - - 0% Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Prjt 817-5804 10,130,000 0% Vine Creek Affordable Housing Prjt 820-5804 2,710,000 - - 0% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 199,023,369 1,905,437 8,790,344 10,695,781 5% (1) Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfers Out - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Other Financing Sources/(Uses) 2,370,430 (411,965) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/202( 15,345,341 15,345,341 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 17,715,771 $ 14,933,376 Notes: (1) The variance is primarily due to the timing of project expenditures and revenues differing from that anticipated in the budge CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL 2018 FINANCING LEASE CIVIC CENTER for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total Percentage of Amended Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: 2018 Financing Lease Revenues TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: Debt Service Principal Debt Service Interest TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfer in Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ $ 0% - 0% 1,547,000 381,000 25% 530,767 137,612 26% 2,077,767 518,612 25% (2,077,767) (518,612) 2,077,767 518,612 CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL 2018 FINANCING LEASE MARGARITA RECREATION CENTER (MRC) for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: 2018 Financing Lease MRC TOTALREVENUES EXPENDITURES: Debt Service Principal Debt Service Interest TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses): Transfer in Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Annual Total Percentage of Amended Activity Budget Budget $ $ 0% - 0% 358,531 88,491 25% 197,277 50,461 26% 555,808 138,952 25% (555,808) (138,952) 555,808 138,952 CITY OF TEMECULA COMBINING STATEMENT OF NET POSITION INTERNAL SERVICE FUNDS As of September 30, 2020 Workers' Vehicles and Information Technology Support Support Facility Insurance Services Facilities Compensation Equipment Technology Replacement Services Replacement TOTAL Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Replacement Fund Fund Fund ASSETS Cash and Investments $1,274,165 $ 2,290,146 $ 1,633,622 $ 1,356,184 Receivables 2,673 5,744 5,238 31,970 Due from Other Funds Prepaid Assets - - 1,000,000 - Property, Plant, and Equipment (net of $ 1,119,188 $ 46,026 $ 352,583 $ 286,265 $ 519,718 $ 8,877,897 2,947 411 847 725 995 51,550 9,739 9,739 - - - - - 1,000,000 accumulated depreciation) - 1,217,133 145,253 498,610 - 101,903 - 234,663 2,197,562 TOTAL ASSETS 1,276,838 2,295,890 3,855,993 1,533,407 1,620,745 46,437 465,072 286,990 755,376 12,136,748 LIABILITIES AND NET POSITION LIABILITIES: Current Liabilities 527,134 12,524 874 295,466 137 40,689 - 112,263 989,087 Capital Leases Payable - - - 125,253 - 2,982 36,654 - 164,889 TOTAL LIABILITIES 527,134 12,524 874 420,719 137 43,671 36,654 112,263 1,153,976 NET POSITION: TOTAL NET POSITION $ 749,704 $ 2,283,366 $ 3,855,119 $ 1,112,688 $ 1,620,608 $ 2,766 $ 428,418 $ 174,727 $ 755,376 $ 10,982,772 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA COMBINING STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES, and CHANGES IN NET POSITION for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Workers' Vehicles and Information Technology Support Support Facility Insurance Services Facilities Compensation Equipment Technology Replacement Services Replacement TOTAL Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Fund Replacement Fund Fund Fund REVENUES: Investment Interest $ 1,614 $ 3,532 $ 2,451 $ 1,848 $ 1,843 $ 32 $ 552 $ 544 $ 538 $ 12,954 Charges for Services 693,745 51,919 1,073,491 39,345 66,838 6,606 326,214 8,605 2,266,763 TOTAL REVENUES 695,359 3,532 54,370 1,075,339 41,188 66,870 7,158 326,758 9,143 2,279,717 EXPENSES: Salaries and Wages 16,493 12,306 - 521,512 - 56,036 - 94,427 - 700,774 Operating Expenses 677,252 84,384 616,611 80,585 10,512 231,242 1,700,586 Interest 258 258 TOTAL EXPENSES 693,745 96,690 1,138,123 80,585 66,806 325,669 2,401,618 Revenues Over/(Under) Expenses 1,614 (93,158) 54,370 (62,784) (39,397) 64 7,158 1,089 9,143 (121,901) Other Financing Sources/(Uses): Transfer In- Measure S - - 65,000 - - - 125,000 190,000 Transfer out - - - (412,056) - (412,056) Net Position as of 7/01/2020 748,090 2,376,524 3,800,749 1,110,472 1,660,005 2,702 421,260 585,694 621,233 11,326,729 Net Position as of 9/30/2020 $ 749,704 $ 2,283,366 $ 3,855,119 $ 1,112,688 $ 1,620,608 $ 2,766 $ 428,418 $ 174,727 $ 755,376 $ 10,982,772 CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - Fiduciary Fund CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE RETIREE BENEFIT TRUST (CERBT) FUND As of September 30, 2020 ASSETS: CERBT FUND Cash and Investments $ 13,700,632 TOTAL ASSETS 13,700,632 LIABILITIES: Accounts Payable 73,587 TOTAL LIABILITIES 73,587 NET POSITION: 13,627,045 Held in Trust for Retiree Benefits 13,627,045 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 13,627,045 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION - Fiduciary Fund CALIFORNIA EMPLOYEE RETIREE BENEFIT TRUST FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 CERBT FUND ADDITIONS Employer $ 219,336 Investment Earnings 712,054 TOTAL ADDITIONS 931,390 DEDUCTIONS: Benefits 292,923 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS 292,923 CHANGE IN NET POSITION 638,467 Net Position as of 7/01/2020 12,988,578 Net Position as of 9/30/2020 $ 13,627,045 CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF NET POSITION - Fiduciary Fund PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND As of September 30, 2020 ASSETS: PENSION FUND Cash and Investments $ 12,797,553 TOTAL ASSETS 12,797,553 LIABILITIES: Accounts Payable - TOTAL LIABILITIES - NET POSITION: 12,797,553 Held in Trust for Retiree Benefits 12,797,553 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 12,797,553 NOTE: Balances are unaudited CITY OF TEMECULA STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION - Fiduciary Fund PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 ADDITIONS: Employer Investment Earnings TOTAL ADDITIONS DEDUCTIONS: Benefits TOTAL DEDUCTIONS CHANGE IN NET POSITION Net Position as of 7/01/2020 Net Position as of 9/30/2020 PENSION FUND 558,372 558,372 558,372 12,239,181 $ 12,797,553 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Authorize City to Serve as Lead on Preparation and Submission of CAL FIRE Vegetation Management/Fuels Reduction Grant (At the Request of Mayor Pro Tempore Rahn) PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Assistant City Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council provide direction for the City to take the lead on the preparation of a California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) grant application for the creation of a vegetation management/fuels reduction plan and seek letters of support from regional agencies. BACKGROUND: There are several areas located within the City limits that would benefit from a professionally completed vegetation management/fuel reduction plan. Input, support and collaboration with valued partners and stakeholders such as Riverside County Fire, Pechanga, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, the Nature Conservancy, Camp Pendleton, US Border Patrol and others will be important to develop a comprehensive plan that will be complementary to the long-term goals of each agency and be of benefit to the impacted property owners. Locations include sensitive habitat areas in Temecula and Murrieta Creeks and tributaries and involves multiple property owners. Topics of concern include wildland fires in areas of dense vegetation and overgrown non-native species; negative impacts to riparian and other sensitive habitats from illegal homeless encampments, trespass/vandalism and as well as their impacts on water quality and wildlife movement. The benefits of such a plan will allow for improved habitat for sensitive and endangered species, removal of invasive species, alleviating flood risks through improved stormwater conveyance. All such variables will be evaluated and addressed as part of a comprehensive plan. Council Member Rahn has been made aware of an opportunity that has opened up at the State level and is seeking full Council support for the City to take the lead and author a grant application, outlining a multi jurisdictional approach and cooperation for such a plan. Grant applications are due May 17, 2021. Related, the City of Temecula Legislative Platform within the environmental quality section cites a City -Specific Policy Statement: • Resolution No. 95-37 — Support legislation that provides adequate safeguards to ensure conservation of threatened and endangered wildlife resources while balancing significant quality of life and financial impacts on local communities. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no known fiscal impact at this time, just the staff time associated with the preparation of a grant application/letters of support. ATTACHMENT: None CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 through 2023-24 PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 through 2023-24 2. Designate the City Manager as "Contract Administrator," in accordance with Section E. of the Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services for the City of Temecula. BACKGROUND: Since the City of Temecula's incorporation, Fire services have been provided through a Cooperative Fire Service Agreement to provide fire protection, fire prevention, rescue, fire marshal and medical aid with the County of Riverside. The current Cooperative Agreement expires June 30, 2021. The Cooperative Agreement is for the three-year term July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2024. Also provided is the schedule of contract staffing costs (Exhibit "A") for the three-year period. Staffing levels will remain at the 4-person per engine standard. This may be amended with 120 days' written notification, if an increase or a reduction in services is desired, however service levels may not fall below the County Board of Supervisors approved staffing level for any fire station (3-person per engine). Amendments to contract staffing (Exhibit "A") can be negotiated with the Riverside County Fire Chief and the City Manager, as the City's designated "Contract Administrator." FISCAL IMPACT: As reflected in the Exhibit A of the attached Cooperative Agreement, Fire Contract services, net of the County Structure Fire Tax Credit, are estimated as follows, and will be included in the respective Annual Operating Budgets: Fiscal Year 2021-22 $7,701,776 Fiscal Year 2022-23 $8,505,761 Fiscal Year 2023-24 $9,349,393 ATTACHMENTS: Cooperative Agreement with the County of Riverside to Provide Fire Protection, Fire Prevention, Rescue, Fire Marshal and Medical Emergency Services A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MARSHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of , 2021, by and between the County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the State of California, on behalf of the Fire Department (hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY"), and the City of Temecula a duly created city (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), whereby it is agreed as follows: SECTION I: PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to arrange for COUNTY, through its Cooperative Fire Programs Fire Protection Reimbursement Agreement ("CAL FIRE Agreement") with the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection ("CAL FIRE"), to provide CITY with fire protection, hazardous materials mitigation, technical rescue response, fire marshal, medical emergency services, and public service assists (hereinafter referred to as "Fire Services"). This Agreement is entered into pursuant to the authority granted by Government Code sections §55600 et seq., and will provide a unified, integrated, cooperative, regional fire protection system. COUNTY's ability to perform under this Agreement is subject to the terms and conditions of the CAL FIRE Agreement. SECTION II: DESIGNATION OF FIRE CHIEF A. The County Fire Chief appointed by the Board of Supervisors, or his/her designee (hereinafter referred to as "Chief"), shall represent COUNTY and CITY during the period of this Agreement, and Chief shall, under the supervision and direction of the County Board of Supervisors, have charge of the organization described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof, for the purpose of providing Fire Services as deemed necessary to satisfy the needs of both the COUNTY and CITY, except upon those lands wherein other agencies of government have responsibility for the same or similar Fire Services. B. The COUNTY will assign an existing Chief Officer as the Fire Department Liaison (hereinafter referred to as "Fire Liaison"). The Chief may delegate certain authority to the Fire Liaison, as the Chief's duly authorized designee, and the Fire Liaison shall be responsible for directing the Fire Services provided to CITY as set forth in Exhibit «A„ C. COUNTY will be allowed flexibility in the assignment of available personnel and equipment in order to provide the Fire Services as agreed upon herein. Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 1 of 9 SECTION III: PAYMENT FOR SERVICES A. CITY shall annually appropriate a fiscal year budget to support the Fire Services designated at a level of service mutually agreed upon by both parties and as set forth in Exhibit "A" for the term of this Agreement. This Exhibit may be amended in writing by mutual agreement by both parties or when a CITY —requested increase or reduction in services is approved by COUNTY. B. COUNTY provides fire personnel and services through its CAL FIRE Agreement. In the event CITY desires an increase or decrease in CAL FIRE or COUNTY civil service employees or services assigned to CITY as provided for in Exhibit "A," CITY shall provide one hundred twenty (120) days written notice of the proposed requested increase or decrease. Proper notification shall include the following: (1) The total amount of increase or decrease; (2) The effective date of the increase or decrease; and (3) The number of employees, by classification, affected by the proposed increase or decrease. If such notice is not provided, CITY shall reimburse COUNTY for relocation costs incurred by COUNTY because of the increase or decrease, in addition to any other remedies available resulting from the increase or decrease in services. COUNTY is under no obligation to approve any requested increase or decrease, and it is expressly understood by the parties that in no event will COUNTY authorize or approve CITY's request to reduce services below the COUNTY Board of Supervisors —approved staffing level for any fire station, or to reduce services to the extent that the services provided under this Agreement are borne by other jurisdictions. COUNTY shall render a written decision on whether to allow or deny the increase or decrease within thirty (30) days of the notice provided pursuant to this section. C. CITY shall pay COUNTY actual costs for Fire Services pursuant to this Agreement. COUNTY shall make a claim to CITY for the actual cost of contracted services, pursuant to Exhibit "A," on a quarterly basis. The COUNTY is mandated per Government Code section §51350 for full cost recovery. CITY shall pay each claim, in full, within thirty (30) days after receipt thereof. D. Any changes to the salaries or expenses set forth in Exhibit "A" made necessary by action of the Legislature, CAL FIRE, or any other public agency with authority to direct changes in the level of salaries or expenses, shall be paid from the funds represented as set forth in Exhibit "A." The CITY is obligated to expend or appropriate any sum in excess of Exhibit "A" increased by action of the Legislature, CAL FIRE, or any other public agency with authority to direct changes. If within thirty (30) days after notice, in writing, from COUNTY to CITY that the actual cost of maintaining the services specified in Exhibit "A" as a result of action by the Legislature, CAL FIRE, or other public agency will exceed the total amount specified therein, and CITY has not agreed to make available the necessary additional funds, COUNTY shall have the right to unilaterally reduce the services furnished under this Agreement by an appropriate amount and shall promptly notify CITY, in writing, specifying the services to be reduced. Any COUNTY or CAL FIRE personnel reduction resulting solely due to an increase in employee salaries or expenses occurring after signing this Agreement and set forth in Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 2of9 Exhibit "A" that CITY does not agree to fund, as described above, shall not be subject to relocation expense reimbursement by CITY. If CITY desires to add funds to the total included herein to cover the cost of increased salaries or services necessitated by actions described in this paragraph, such increase shall be accomplished by an additional appropriation by the City Council of CITY, and an amendment to Exhibit "A" approved by the parties hereto. E. Chief may be authorized to negotiate and execute any amendments to Exhibit "A" or Exhibit "C" of this Agreement on behalf of COUNTY as authorized by the Board of Supervisors. CITY shall designate a "Contract Administrator" who shall, under the supervision and direction of CITY, be authorized to execute amendments to Exhibits "A" or "C" on behalf of CITY. F. [ X ] (Check only if applicable, and please initial to acknowledge) Additional terms as set forth in the attached Exhibit "B" are incorporated herein and shall additionally apply to this agreement regarding payment of services. G. [ X ] (Check only if applicable, and please initial to acknowledge) Additional terms as set forth in the attached Exhibit "C" are incorporated herein and shall additionally apply to this agreement regarding payment for the Fire Engine Use Agreement. H. [ X ] (Check only if applicable, and please initial to acknowledge) Additional terms as set forth in the attached Exhibit "D" are incorporated herein and shall additionally apply to this agreement regarding payment for Fire Marshall Services. I. Notwithstanding Paragraph G, as it relates to the Fire Engine Use Agreement herein if applicable, additional terms as set forth are incorporated herein and shall additionally apply to this Agreement regarding payment of services. In the event that a fire engine, owned and maintained by the CITY has a catastrophic failure, the COUNTY Fire Chief may allow use of a COUNTY fire engine, free of charge up to one hundred twenty (120) days. After the initial one hundred twenty (120) days, a rental fee will be applied to the CITY invoice for use of said COUNTY fire engine. The rental fee shall be Two Thousand Fifty -Five Dollars ($2,055) per day; or Fourteen Thousand Three Hundred Eighty -Four Dollars ($14,384) per week. J. Notwithstanding Paragraph H, as it relates to Fire Marshal services herein, if applicable, additional terms as set forth are incorporated herein and shall additionally apply to this agreement regarding Fire Marshal services. In the event the CITY elects not to use Fire Marshal services outlined in Paragraph H (Exhibit D), the services must be provided by the COUNTY Office of the Fire Marshal pursuant to Health and Safety Code section 13146.3 at a cost to the owner as outlined in COUNTY Ordinance No. 671(Establishing Consolidated Fees For Land Use and Related Functions). SECTION IV: INITIAL TERM AND AMENDMENT A. The term of this Agreement shall be from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2024. Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 3of9 B. One (1) year prior to the date of expiration of this Agreement, CITY shall give COUNTY written notice of whether CITY intends to enter into a new Agreement with COUNTY for Fire Services and, if so, whether CITY intends to request a change in the level of Fire Services provided under this Agreement. SECTION V: TERMINATION During the term of this Agreement, this Agreement may only be terminated by the voters of either the COUNTY or the CITY pursuant to Government Code §55603.5. SECTION VI: COOPERATIVE OPERATIONS All Fire Services contemplated under this Agreement shall be performed by both parties to this Agreement working as one unit; therefore, personnel and/or equipment belonging to either CITY or COUNTY may be temporarily dispatched elsewhere from time to time for mutual aid. SECTION VII: MUTUAL AID Pursuant to Health and Safety Code sections 13050 et seq., when rendering mutual aid or assistance, COUNTY may, at the request of CITY, demand payment of charges and seek reimbursement of CITY costs for personnel, equipment use, and operating expenses as funded herein, under authority given by Health and Safety Code sections 13051 and 13054. COUNTY, in seeking said reimbursement pursuant to such request of CITY, shall represent the CITY by following the procedures set forth in Health and Safety Code section 13052. Any recovery of CITY costs, less actual expenses, shall be paid or credited to the CITY, as directed by CITY. In all such instances, COUNTY shall give timely notice of the possible application of Health and Safety Code sections 13051 and 13054 to the officer designated by CITY. SECTION VIII: SUPPRESSION COST RECOVERY As provided in Health and Safety Code section 13009, Riverside County Ordinance No. 787, section 5.E.2., and California Fire Code, COUNTY may bring an action for collection of suppression costs of any fire caused by negligence, violation of law, or failure to correct noticed fire safety violations. Additionally, COUNTY may bring action for collection to any person who negligently, intentionally or in violation of law causes an emergency response, including, but not limited to, a traffic accident, spill of toxic or flammable fluids or chemicals is liable for the costs of securing such emergency, including those costs pursuant to Government Code section 53150, et seq, as may be amended from time to time. When using CITY equipment and personnel under the terms of this Agreement, COUNTY may bring such actions for collection of costs incurred by CITY and the COUNTY. In such a case CITY appoints and designates COUNTY as its agent in said collection proceedings. In the event of recovery, COUNTY shall apportion Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 4of9 the recovered amount via the annual Cost Allocation Plan. This recovery does not include CITY resources outside of this Cooperative Agreement. Those resources would require the CITY to obtain cost recovery directly. In all such instances, COUNTY shall give timely notice of the possible application of Health and Safety Code section 13009 to the officer designated by CITY. SECTION IX: PROPERTY ACCOUNTING All personal property provided by CITY and by COUNTY for the purpose of providing Fire Services under the terms of this Agreement shall be marked and accounted for in such a manner as to conform to the standard operating procedure established by the COUNTY for the segregation, care, and use of the respective property of each. SECTION X: FACILITY CITY shall provide Fire Station(s), strategically located to provide standard response time within the City of Temecula from which fire operations shall be conducted. If the Fire Station(s) are owned by the CITY, the CITY shall maintain the facilities at CITY's cost and expense. In the event CITY requests COUNTY to undertake repairs or maintenance costs or services, the costs and expenses of such repairs or maintenance shall be reimbursed to COUNTY through the Support Services Cost Allocation, or as a direct Invoice to the CITY. SECTION XI: INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, COUNTY shall and does agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless CITY, its agencies, districts, special districts and departments, their respective directors, officers, elected and appointed officials, employees, agents and representatives (collectively, "Indemnitees") for, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, awards, judgments and expenses, attorney and/or consultant fees and costs, taxable or otherwise, of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity, directly or indirectly arising out of, caused by, or resulting from (1) the Services performed hereunder by COUNTY, or any part thereof, (2) the Agreement, including any approved amendments or modifications, or (3) any negligent act or omission of COUNTY, its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents, or representatives (collectively, "Liabilities"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the only Liabilities with respect to which COUNTY's obligation to indemnify, including the cost to defend, the Indemnitees does not apply is with respect to Liabilities resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnitee, or to the extent such claims do not arise out of, pertain to or relate to the Scope of Work in the Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, CITY shall and does agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless COUNTY, its agencies, departments, directors, officers, agents, Board of Supervisors, elected and appointed officials and representatives (collectively, "Indemnitees") for, from and against any and all liabilities, claims, damages, losses, liens, causes of action, suits, awards, judgments and expenses, Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 5of9 attorney and/or consultant fees and costs, taxable or otherwise, of any nature, kind or description of any person or entity, directly or indirectly arising out of, caused by, or resulting from (1) the services performed hereunder, by CITY, or any part thereof, (2) the Agreement, including any approved amendments or modifications, or (3) any negligent act or omission of CITY its officers, employees, subcontractors, agents, or representatives (collectively, "Liabilities"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the only Liabilities with respect to which CITY's obligation to indemnify, including the cost to defend, the Indemnitees does not apply is with respect to Liabilities resulting from the negligence or willful misconduct of an Indemnitee, or to the extent such claims do not arise out of, pertain to or relate to the Scope of Work in the Agreement. SECTION XII: AUDIT A. COUNTY and CITY agree that their designated representative shall have the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation of the other party hereto pertaining to the performance of this Agreement. COUNTY and CITY agree to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of three (3) years after final payment, unless a longer period of records retention is stipulated or as required by law, and to allow the auditor(s) of the other party access to such records during normal business hours. COUNTY and CITY agree to a similar right to audit records in any subcontract related to performance of this Agreement. (E.g., Gov. Code, §8546.7). B. Each party shall bear its own costs in performing a requested audit. SECTION XIII: DISPUTES CITY shall select and appoint a "Contract Administrator" who shall, under the supervision and direction of CITY, be available for contract resolution or policy intervention with COUNTY, when, upon determination by the Chief that a situation exists under this Agreement in which a decision to serve the interest of CITY has the potential to conflict with COUNTY interest or policy. Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under the terms of this Agreement which is not disposed of within a reasonable period of time by the CITY and COUNTY employees normally responsible for the administration of this Agreement shall be brought to the attention of the Chief Executive Officer (or designated representative) of each organization for joint resolution. For purposes of this provision, a "reasonable period of time" shall be ten (10) calendar days or less. CITY and COUNTY agree to continue with the responsibilities under this Agreement during any dispute. Disputes that are not resolved informally by and between CITY and COUNTY representatives may be resolved, by mutual agreement of the parties, through mediation. Such mediator will be jointly selected by the parties. The costs associated with mediator shall be shared equally among the participating parties. If the mediation does not resolve the issue(s), or if the parties cannot agree to mediation, the parties reserve the right to seek remedies as provided by law or in equity. The parties agree, pursuant to Battaglia Enterprises v. Superior Court (2013) 215 Cal.AppAt" 309, that each of the parties are sophisticated and negotiated this agreement and this venue at arm's length. Pursuant to this Agreement, the parties agree that venue for litigation Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 6ofs shall be in the Superior Court of Riverside County. Should any party attempt to defeat this section and challenge venue in Superior Court, the party challenging venue stipulates to request the Court change venue to San Bernardino County and shall not ask for venue in any other County. Any claims or causes of actions, whether they arise out of unresolved disputes as specified in this section or claims by third parties that are made against the COUNTY, shall be submitted to the Office of the Clerk of the Board for the County of Riverside in a timely manner. For claims made against the COUNTY that involve CAL FIRE employees, to the extent permissible under the COUNTY's contract with CAL FIRE, the claims will be forwarded on to CAL FIRE for processing. SECTION XIV: ATTORNEYS' FEES If CITY fails to remit payments for services rendered pursuant to any provision of this Agreement, COUNTY may seek recovery of fees through litigation, in addition to all other remedies available. In the event of litigation between COUNTY and CITY to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement or any right of either party hereto, the unsuccessful party to such litigation agrees to pay the prevailing party's costs and expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, all of which shall be included in and as a part of the judgment rendered in such litigation. SECTION XV: DELIVERY OF NOTICES Any notices to be served pursuant to this Agreement shall be considered delivered when deposited in the United States mail and addressed to: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA Riverside County Fire Chief City Manager 210 West San Jacinto Avenue City of Temecula Perris, CA 92570 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Provisions of this section do not preclude any notices being delivered in person to the addresses shown above. Delivery in person shall constitute service hereunder, effective when such service is made. SECTION XVI: ENTIRE CONTRACT This Agreement contains the whole contract between the parties for the provision of Fire Services. It may be amended or modified upon the mutual written consent of the parties hereto where in accordance with applicable state law. This Agreement does NOT supplement other specific agreements entered into by both parties for equipment or Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 7of9 facilities, and excepting those equipment or facilities agreements, this Agreement cancels and supersedes any previous agreement for the same or similar services. [Signature Provisions on following page] Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the duly authorized officials of the parties hereto have, in their respective capacities, set their hands as of the date first hereinabove written. Dated: /_raION9 By: Randi Johl, City Clerk Dated: ATTEST: KECIA HARPER Clerk of the Board By: Deputy (SEAL) (SEAL) CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, City Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter Thorson, City Attorney COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE Chair, Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM: GREGORY P. PRIAMOS, County Counsel By: MELISSA R. CUSHMAN Deputy County Counsel F. WataIRRU County Finance)Contract odes)COOPERATIVE A GREEMENTITEMPLATEI COOPERATIVE A GREEMENTYTEMPLATE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT 20210316.docx Cooperative Fire Agreement City of Temecula July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2024 EXHIBIT "A" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MARSHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 FOR FY2021/2022 THRU FY2023/2024 CITY BUDGET COST ESTIMATE (with Tax Credit) FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 TOTAL CITY BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR FY2021/2022 THRU FY2023/2024 CITY BUDGET COST ESTIMATE (without Tax Credit) FISCAL YEAR 2021/2022 FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 FISCAL YEAR 2023/2024 $7,701,776 $8,505,761 $9,349,393 $25,556,930 $16,956,560 $17,760,545 $18,604,176 TOTAL CITY BUDGET ESTIMATE FOR FY2021/2022 THRU FY2023/2024 $53,321,281 EXHIBIT "A" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MARSHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 FOR FY2021/2022 *See notation below for estimate assumptions CAPTAINS CAPTAIN ENGINEERS ENGINEER FF II FFII TOTALS MEDICS _ MEDICS- MEDICS STA #12 Medic Engine 450,542 2 396,564 2 347,662 2 399,919 2 1,594,688 8 STA #73 Medic Engine 450,542 2 198,282 1 226,431 1 347,662 2 399,919 2 1,622,837 8 (Truck Co.) 675,813 3 594,846 3 521,493 3 599,879 3 2,392,032 12 STA #84 Medic Engine 450,542 2 396,564 2 347,662 2 399,919 2 1,594,688 8 STA #92 Medic Engine 450,542 2 198,282 1 226,431 1 347,662 2 399,919 2 1,622,837 8 STA #95 Medic Engine 450,542 2 198,282 1 226,431 1 347,662 2 399,919 2 1,622,837 8 Fixed Relief 225,271 1 226,431 1 173,831 1 199,960 1 825,493 4 Vac. Relief - Engine 225,271 1 198,282 1 452,862 2 347,662 2 199,960 1 1,424,037 7 SUBTOTALS 3,379,067 2,181,104 1,358,585 2,781,296 2,999,395 $12,699,447 SUBTOTAL STAFF 15 11 6 16 15 63 BATTALION CHIEF 263,060 each 263,060 1 CAPTAIN MEDIC 254,658 each 254,658 1 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR (PCN 110077) 173,935 each 173,935 1 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST (PCN 00006966 & 00131494) 161,564 each 323,129 2 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR (PCN 00006972, 00133413, 00131566) 141,812 each 425,437 3 SUBTOTAL $1,440,219 71 ESTIMATED SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire Cost Allocation Plan) Administrative/Operational (Schedule A) 16,082 per assigned Staff "* 1,045,346 65 Volunteer Program (Schedule B) 5,504 Per Entity Allocation 5,504 1 Medic Program (Schedule C) 10,648 Medic FTE and 1,370 per Defib 231,824 21 ECC Support (Schedule E) 28.12 per Call and 18,529 per Station 340,808 Fleet Support (Schedule F) 65,330 per Fire Suppression Equip 326,652 5 Comm/IT Support (Schedule G) 41.21 per Call and 27,160 per Station 499,495 Hazmat Support (Schedule I) 1,096 per Call and 4,468 per Station 43,912 SUPPORT SERVICES SUBTOTAL $2,493,542 DIRECT CHARGES 142,102 FIRE ENGINE USE AGREEMENT 36,250 each engine 181,250 5 TOTAL STAFF COUNT 71 TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $16,956,560 * TEMECULA ESTIMATED FIRE TAX CREDIT ($9,254,784) NET ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $7,701,776 * STRUCTURAL FIRE TAXES (956,601) ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PASS THRU (8,298,183) TOTAL TAX FUNDING ($9,254,784) 4.5 Fire Stations 63.00 Assigned Staff 9,156 Number of Calls 2.0 Batt. Chief/Capt. Medic Support 21 Assigned Medic FTE ** 65.00 Total Assigned Staff 6 Monitors/Defibs 4.5 Hazmat Stations 20 Number of Hazmat Calls FY21122 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 2 of 7 SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire _Cost Allocation Plan) Administrae & Operational Services Finance / Accounting Public Affairs / Education Training Procurement Data Processing Fire Fighting Equip. Personnel Office Supplies/Equip. Volunteer Program - Support staff, Workers Comp, and Personal Liability Insurance Medic Program - Support staff, Training, Certification, Case Review & Reporting, Monitor/ Defibrillator replacement cycle. Fleet Support - Support staff, automotive costs, vehicle/engine maintenance, fuel costs Emergency Command Center Support - Dispatch services costs Communications / IT Support - Support staff, communications, radio maintenance, computer support functions Hazmat Program - Support staff, operating costs, and vehicle replacement FY 21/22 POSITION SALARIES TOP STEP (per assumptions below) 316,514 DEPUTY CHIEF 36,250 FIRE ENGINE 312,336 DIV CHIEF 16,082 SRVDEL 263,060 BAT CHIEF 5,504 VOL DEL 225,271 CAPT 10,648 MEDIC FTE 254,658 CAPT MEDIC 1,370 MEDIC MONITORS/DEFIBS REPLACEMENT 198,282 ENG 78,644 BATT DEL 226,431 ENG/MEDIC 18,529 ECC STATION 173,831 FF II 28.12 ECC CALLS 199,960 FF II/MEDIC 65,330 FLEET SUPPORT 173,935 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR 27,160 COMM/IT STATION 161,564 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST 41.21 COMM/IT CALLS 141,812 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR 1,442 FACILITY STATION 83,148 OFFICE ASSISTANT III 418.92 FACILITY FTE 94,600 SECRETARY I 4,468 HAZMAT STATION 179,773 COUNTY DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL 1,095.74 HAZMAT CALLS 1,891 HAZMAT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 'Cost Assumptions: All Salaries based on FINAL Salary, Pay Differentials, and Operating Expenses Schedule FY 2021-2022 Dated January 1 Z 2021 Benefits and Admin Fee based on Staff Benefit Rate Matrix FY 2021-22 dated February 2021 - Prelim Direct cost of benefits (COBEN) is based on 1st Qtr AO-17 data. Estimated Support Services based on assumptions above FY 21/22 DIRECT BILL ACCOUNT CODES 520230 Cellular Phone 522340 Station Budgeted Maint-Building and Improvement 520300 Pager Service 522360 Maint-Extermination 520320 Telephone Service 522380 Maint-Critical Systems 520800 Household Expense 522410 Maint-Health & Safety 520805 Appliances 522860 Medical Supplies 520830 Laundry Services 522890 Pharmaceuticals 520840 Household Furnishings 523220 Licenses And Permits 520845 Trash 523680 Office Equip Non Fixed Assets 521380 Maint-Copier Machines 526700 Rent -Lease Building 521440 Maint-Kitchen Equipment 529500 Electricity 521540 Maint-Office Equipment 529510 Heating Fuel 521660 Maint-Telephone 529550 Water 521680 Maint-Underground Tanks 537240 Interfnd Exp-Utilities 522310 Maint-Building and Improvement 542060 Capital Improvements Facilities FY21122 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MARSHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 FOR FY2022/2023 *See notation below for estimate assumptions CAPTAINS CAPTAIN ENGINEERS ENGINEER FF II FFII TOTALS MEDICS __MEDICS__ MEDICS STA #12 Medic Engine 473,069 2 416,393 2 365,045 2 419,915 2 1,674,422 8 STA #73 Medic Engine 473,069 2 208,196 1 237,752 1 365,045 2 419,915 2 1,703,979 8 (Truck Co.) 709,604 3 624,589 3 547,568 3 629,873 3 2,511,633 12 STA #84 Medic Engine 473,069 2 416,393 2 365,045 2 419,915 2 1,674,422 8 STA #92 Medic Engine 473,069 2 208,196 1 237,752 1 365,045 2 419,915 2 1,703,979 8 STA #95 Medic Engine 473,069 2 208,196 1 237,752 1 365,045 2 419,915 2 1,703,979 8 Fixed Relief 236,535 1 237,752 1 182,523 1 209,958 1 866,767 4 Vac. Relief - Engine 236,535 1 208,196 1 475,505 2 365,045 2 209,958 1 1,495,239 7 SUBTOTALS 3,548,020 2,290,159 1,426,515 2,920,360 3,149,365 $13,334,420 SUBTOTAL STAFF 15 11 6 16 15 63 BATTALION CHIEF 276,213 each 276,213 1 CAPTAIN MEDIC 267,391 each 267,391 1 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR (PCN 110077) 177,414 each 177,414 1 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST (PCN 00006966 & 00131494) 164,796 each 329,591 2 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR (PCN 00006972, 00133413, 00131566) 144,649 each 433,946 3 SUBTOTAL $1,484,555 71 ESTIMATED SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire Cost Allocation Plan) Administrative/Operational (Schedule A) 16,886 per assigned Staff ** 1,097,614 65 Volunteer Program (Schedule B) 5,779 Per Entity Allocation 5,779 1 Medic Program (Schedule C) 11,180 Medic FTE and 1,439 per Defib 243,415 21 ECC Support (Schedule E) 29.52 per Call and 19,455 per Station 357,848 Fleet Support (Schedule F) 68,597 per Fire Suppression Equip 342,985 5 Comm/IT Support (Schedule G) 43.27 per Call and 28,518 per Station 524,470 Hazmat Support (Schedule I) 1,151 per Call and 4,691 per Station 46,108 SUPPORT SERVICES SUBTOTAL $2,618,219 DIRECT CHARGES 142,102 FIRE ENGINE USE AGREEMENT 36,250 each engine 181,250 5 TOTAL STAFF COUNT 71 TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $17,760,545 * TEMECULA ESTIMATED FIRE TAX CREDIT ($9,254,784) NET ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $8,505,761 * STRUCTURAL FIRE TAXES (956,601) ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PASS THRU (8,298,183) TOTAL TAX FUNDING ($9,254,784) 4.5 Fire Stations 63.00 Assigned Staff 9,156 Number of Calls 2.0 Batt. Chief/Capt. Medic Support 21 Assigned Medic FTE ** 65.00 Total Assigned Staff 6 Monitors/Defibs 4.5 Hazmat Stations 20 Number of Hazmat Calls FY22123 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 4 of 7 SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire Cost_ Allocation Plan) Administrative & Operational Services Finance / Accounting Public Affairs / Education Training Procurement Data Processing Fire Fighting Equip. Personnel Office Supplies/Equip. Volunteer Program - Support staff, Workers Comp, and Personal Liability Insurance Medic Program - Support staff, Training, Certification, Case Review & Reporting, Monitor/ Defibrillator replacement cycle. Fleet Support - Support staff, automotive costs, vehicle/engine maintenance, fuel costs Emergency Command Center Support - Dispatch services costs Communications / IT Support - Support staff, communications, radio maintenance, computer support functions Hazmat Program - Support staff, operating costs, and vehicle replacement FY 22/23 POSITION SALARIES TOP STEP (per assumptions below) 332,340 DEPUTY CHIEF 36,250 FIRE ENGINE 327,953 DIV CHIEF 16,886 SRVDEL 276,213 BAT CHIEF 5,779 VOL DEL 236,535 CAPT 11,180 MEDIC FTE 267,391 CAPT MEDIC 1,439 MEDIC MONITORS/DEFIBS REPLACEMENT 208,196 ENG 82,576 BATT DEL 237,752 ENG/MEDIC 19,455 ECC STATION 182,523 FF II 29.52 ECC CALLS 209,958 FF II/MEDIC 68,597 FLEET SUPPORT 177,414 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR 28,518 COMM/IT STATION 164,796 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST 43.27 COMM/IT CALLS 144,649 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR 1,514 FACILITY STATION 84,811 OFFICE ASSISTANT III 439.86 FACILITY FTE 96,492 SECRETARY I 4,691 HAZMAT STATION 183,369 COUNTY DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL 1,150.52 HAZMAT CALLS 1,986 HAZMAT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT *Cost Assumptions: All Salaries based on FINAL Salary, Pay Differentials, and Operating Expenses Schedule FY 2021-2022 Dated January 12, 2021 Benefits and Admin Fee based on Staff Benefit Rate Matrix FY 2021-22 dated February 2021 - Prelim Direct cost of benefits (COBEN) is based on 1st Qtr AO-17 data. Projected increase of 5% to Safety & 2% Non -Safety Staff and 5% Support Services from previous FY21/22. FY 22/23 DIRECT BILL ACCOUNT CODE 520230 Cellular Phone 522340 Station Budgeted Maint-Building and Improvement 520300 Pager Service 522360 Maint-Extermination 520320 Telephone Service 522380 Maint-Critical Systems 520800 Household Expense 522410 Maint-Health & Safety 520805 Appliances 522860 Medical Supplies 520830 Laundry Services 522890 Pharmaceuticals 520840 Household Furnishings 523220 Licenses And Permits 520845 Trash 523680 Office Equip Non Fixed Assets 521380 Maint-Copier Machines 526700 Rent -Lease Building 521440 Maint-Kitchen Equipment 529500 Electricity 521540 Maint-Office Equipment 529510 Heating Fuel 521660 Maint-Telephone 529550 Water 521680 Maint-Underground Tanks 537240 Interfnd Exp-Utilities 522310 Maint-Building and Improvement 542060 Capital Improvements Facilities FY22123 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 5 of 7 EXHIBIT "A" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MARSHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 FOR FY2023/2024 *See notation below for estimate assumptions CAPTAINS CAPTAIN ENGINEERS ENGINEER FF II FFII TOTALS MEDICS _ MEDICS- MEDICS STA #12 Medic Engine 496,723 2 437,212 2 383,297 2 440,911 2 1,758,143 8 STA #73 Medic Engine 496,723 2 218,606 1 249,640 1 383,297 2 440,911 2 1,789,177 8 (Truck Co.) 745,084 3 655,818 3 574,946 3 661,367 3 2,637,215 12 STA #84 Medic Engine 496,723 2 437,212 2 383,297 2 440,911 2 1,758,143 8 STA #92 Medic Engine 496,723 2 218,606 1 249,640 1 383,297 2 440,911 2 1,789,177 8 STA #95 Medic Engine 496,723 2 218,606 1 249,640 1 383,297 2 440,911 2 1,789,177 8 Fixed Relief 248,361 1 249,640 1 191,649 1 220,456 1 910,106 4 Vac. Relief - Engine 248,361 1 218,606 1 499,280 2 383,297 2 220,456 1 1,570,001 7 SUBTOTALS 3,725,421 2,404,667 1,497,840 3,066,378 3,306,834 $14,001,141 SUBTOTAL STAFF 15 11 6 16 15 63 BATTALION CHIEF 290,023 each 290,023 1 CAPTAIN MEDIC 280,761 each 280,761 1 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR (PCN 110077) 180,962 each 180,962 1 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST (PCN 00006966 & 00131494) 168,091 each 336,183 2 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR (PCN 00006972, 00133413, 00131566) 147,542 each 442,625 3 SUBTOTAL $1,530,554 71 ESTIMATED SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire Cost Allocation Plan) Administrative/Operational (Schedule A) 17,731 per assigned Staff "* 1,152,494 65 Volunteer Program (Schedule B) 6,068 Per Entity Allocation 6,068 1 Medic Program (Schedule C) 11,739 Medic FTE and 1,511 per Defib 255,586 21 ECC Support (Schedule E) 31.00 per Call and 20,428 per Station 375,741 Fleet Support (Schedule F) 72,027 per Fire Suppression Equip 360,134 5 Comm/IT Support (Schedule G) 45.43 per Call and 29,944 per Station 550,693 Hazmat Support (Schedule I) 1,208 per Call and 4,926 per Station 48,413 SUPPORT SERVICES SUBTOTAL $2,749,130 DIRECT CHARGES 142,102 FIRE ENGINE USE AGREEMENT 36,250 each engine 181,250 5 TOTAL STAFF COUNT 71 TOTAL ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $18,604,176 * TEMECULA ESTIMATED FIRE TAX CREDIT ($9,254,784) NET ESTIMATED CITY BUDGET $9,349,393 * STRUCTURAL FIRE TAXES (956,601) ESTIMATED REDEVELOPMENT PASS THRU (8,298,183) TOTAL TAX FUNDING ($9,254,784) 4.5 Fire Stations 63.00 Assigned Staff 9,156 Number of Calls 2.0 Batt. Chief/Capt. Medic Support 21 Assigned Medic FTE ** 65.00 Total Assigned Staff 6 Monitors/Defibs 4.5 Hazmat Stations 20 Number of Hazmat Calls FY23124 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 6 of 7 SUPPORT SERVICES (Fire _Cost Allocation Plan) Administrae & Operational Services Finance / Accounting Public Affairs / Education Training Procurement Data Processing Fire Fighting Equip. Personnel Office Supplies/Equip. Volunteer Program - Support staff, Workers Comp, and Personal Liability Insurance Medic Program - Support staff, Training, Certification, Case Review & Reporting, Monitor/ Defibrillator replacement cycle. Fleet Support - Support staff, automotive costs, vehicle/engine maintenance, fuel costs Emergency Command Center Support - Dispatch services costs Communications / IT Support - Support staff, communications, radio maintenance, computer support functions Hazmat Program - Support staff, operating costs, and vehicle replacement FY 23/24 POSITION SALARIES TOP STEP (per assumptions below) 348,957 DEPUTY CHIEF 36,250 FIRE ENGINE 344,350 DIV CHIEF 17,731 SRVDEL 290,023 BAT CHIEF 6,068 VOL DEL 248,361 CAPT 11,739 MEDIC FTE 280,761 CAPT MEDIC 1,511 MEDIC MONITORS/DEFIBS REPLACEMENT 218,606 ENG 86,705 BATT DEL 249,640 ENG/MEDIC 20,428 ECC STATION 191,649 FF II 31.00 ECC CALLS 220,456 FF II/MEDIC 72,027 FLEET SUPPORT 180,962 FIRE SAFETY SUPERVISOR 29,944 COMM/IT STATION 168,091 FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST 45.43 COMM/IT CALLS 147,542 FIRE SYSTEMS INSPECTOR 1,590 FACILITY STATION 86,507 OFFICE ASSISTANT III 461.86 FACILITY FTE 98,422 SECRETARY I 4,926 HAZMAT STATION 187,036 COUNTY DEPUTY FIRE MARSHAL 1,208.05 HAZMAT CALLS 2,085 HAZMAT VEHICLE REPLACEMENT 'Cost Assumptions: All Salaries based on FINAL Salary, Pay Differentials, and Operating Expenses Schedule FY 2021-2022 Dated January 12, 2021 Benefits and Admin Fee based on Staff Benefit Rate Matrix FY 2021-22 dated February 2021 - Prelim Direct cost of benefits (COBEN) is based on 1st Qtr AO-17 data. Projected increase of 5% to Safety & 2% Non -Safety Staff and 5% Support Services from previous FY22123 FY 23/24 DIRECT BILL ACCOUNT CODE 520230 Cellular Phone 522340 Station Budgeted Maint-Building and Improvement 520300 Pager Service 522360 Maint-Extermination 520320 Telephone Service 522380 Maint-Critical Systems 520800 Household Expense 522410 Maint-Health & Safety 520805 Appliances 522860 Medical Supplies 520830 Laundry Services 522890 Pharmaceuticals 520840 Household Furnishings 523220 Licenses And Permits 520845 Trash 523680 Office Equip Non Fixed Assets 521380 Maint-Copier Machines 526700 Rent -Lease Building 521440 Maint-Kitchen Equipment 529500 Electricity 521540 Maint-Office Equipment 529510 Heating Fuel 521660 Maint-Telephone 529550 Water 521680 Maint-Underground Tanks 537240 Interfnd Exp-Utilities 522310 Maint-Building and Improvement 542060 Capital Improvements Facilities FY23124 EXHIBIT "A" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 7 of 7 EXHIBIT "B" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE AND MEDICAL AID FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES ADDITIONAL TERMS COUNTY shall make a claim to CITY for the actual cost of contracted services as shown on Exhibit "A" during each of the following periods: (1) July 1 through September 30, claim in October; (2) October 1 through December 31, claim in January; (3) January 1 through March 31, claim in April; and (4) April 1 through June 30, claim in July/August. The claims shall be for actual costs of services after any deduction for estimated Structural Fire taxes and/or Redevelopment, with final reconciliation of fire taxes to actual revenue received which may result in an additional credit or expense to CITY in the August final claim. CITY shall pay each claim within 30 days after receipt thereof. COUNTY shall allow a credit in the amount of the Structural Fire taxes as determined by COUNTY Auditor Controller/Treasurer Tax Collector Office to be collected in each fiscal year of this Agreement. The allowed credit shall not exceed the cost of contracted services. Exhibit "B" CITY OF TEMECULA 1 of 1 EXHIBIT "C" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, RESCUE, FIRE MASHAL AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 PAYMENT FOR SERVICES ADDITIONAL SERVICES FIRE ENGINE USE AGREEMENT Station 12 Engine E12, RCO No. 12-820 $ 36,250.00 0tatinn 7.'� Engine E73, RCO No. 16-804 $ 36,250.00 Station 84 Engine E84, RCO No. 16-806 $ 36,250.00 .qtntinn A9 Engine E92, RCO No. 08-869 $ 36,250.00 Station 95 Engine E95, RCO No. 15-847 $ 36,250.00 $ 181,250.00 The Fire Engine Use Agreement is utilized in the event that a fire engine(s) which was initially purchased by the CITY, and then the CITY elects to have the COUNTY take responsibility of said fire engine(s). The Fire Engine Use Agreement guarantees the CITY the use of this fire engine(s), the COUNTY network of equipment, and resources of the COUNTY. This fire engine(s) shall be used as an integrated unit for Fire Services as set forth in this Cooperative Agreement between the COUNTY and CITY, and shall be stationed primarily in the CITY. The change in ownership of the fire engine does not waive or supersede any responsibilities of the CITY pursuant to this agreement. This Exhibit "C CITY OF TEMECULA Page 1 of 2 exhibit is strictly to further detail for the CITY, the responsibilities and costs associated within the Cooperative Agreement between the COUNTY and CITY; therefore, the Fire Engine Use Agreement is inseparable. The CITY will have the option of transferring title of said fire engine(s) to the COUNTY. If the CITY transfers title of said fire engine(s) to the County, the County will take ownership of the said fire engine(s), and the County will maintain insurance on said fire engine(s). If the CITY opts to maintain ownership and title of said fire engine(s), the CITY will maintain insurance on said fire engine(s). Proof of Insurance is to be provided to the COUNTY. The COUNTY will ensure a working fire engine(s) is available for the CITY at all times under this agreement. All capital improvements and/or betterments to the fire engine(s) listed above, will be the responsibility and paid for by the owner of said fire engine(s). All other maintenance and repairs to the fire engine(s) listed above, will be the responsibility and paid for by the COUNTY under this Agreement. When the Riverside County Fire Department Fleet personnel determine the fire engine(s) listed above is due for replacement, the COUNTY will purchase a new fire engine(s); and, the owner of the old fire engine(s) may survey said fire engine(s) or reallocate as a second roll response fire engine. The annual cost for this service is calculated at 1/20 of the replacement cost. The current replacement cost is $725,000. If this Agreement is entered into mid- year, the annual cost will be prorated accordingly. The CITY may opt out of this Agreement at any time in writing and the costs will be prorated accordingly by fiscal year. No refunds will be provided for any prior payments. If the fire engine(s) have been titled to the COUNTY and the fire engine(s) are still within their useful life cycle, the ownership will not revert back to the CITY unless the entire Cooperative Agreement is terminated. Exhibit "C CITY OF TEMECULA Page 2 of 2 Item No. 7 EXHIBIT "D" TO THE COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE FIRE PROTECTION, FIRE PREVENTION, FIRE MARSHAL, RESCUE AND MEDICAL EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA DATED JULY 1, 2021 PAYMENT FOR ADDITIONAL SERVICES OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL AGREEMENT The Fire Marshal Agreement is utilized in the event a CITY elects to fund locally direct COUNTY Fire Marshal personnel at the CITY to perform the duties of the Office of the Fire Marshal. These duties include: For conformance with applicable laws, codes and regulations concerning fire protection and life safety - • Review Planning and Development Cases for the CITY • Review and inspection of construction development for the CITY • State mandated Fire/Life Safety Inspections in accordance with Health and Safety Code 13146.1, 13146.2, 13146.3, 13217 and 13235 • Review, Permitting and Inspection of Special Events • Investigation of fire safety complaints • Meeting with development applicants and customers Administrative activities - • Creation and maintenance of forms for review and inspection of construction development and fire/life safety inspections. • Provide information to customers on CITY Ordinances and Standards for construction • Creation and maintenance of Information Bulletins, Technical Policies and Standards for Fire Protection in the CITY • Provide recommendations on updating CITY Ordinances and Standards in regards to fire/life safety In the event CITY desires an increase in the Office of the Fire Marshal duties services provides, CITY shall provide sixty (60) days written notice of the proposed increase in services. COUNTY is under no obligation to approve any requested increase. COUNTY shall render a written decision on whether to allow or deny the increase within thirty (30) days of the notice provided pursuant to this section. It is the CITY responsibility to provide funding for all direct operating supplies for each position in accordance with COUNTY requirements and/or standards. These supplies include, but are not limited to: • Vehicle and regular maintenance • Training • Office space, furniture, Code & Standard reference books, and general & field supplies Exhibit "D" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 1 of 2 • All IT and Communication tools (such as cell phone, computer, etc.) • Uniform costs All costs including salaries and benefits will be included in each quarterly invoice as outlined in the Cooperative Agreement. The CITY may opt out of this Agreement and eliminate funding for locally direct COUNTY Fire Marshal personnel at the CITY in writing with a minimum notice of one hundred and twenty (120) days. The costs will be prorated accordingly by services provided and fiscal year. It is the responsibility of the CITY to obtain cost recovery for the Fire Marshal services provided by these personnel for the CITY. Contract CitieslEXHIBIT D - Fire Marshal Services l Template Exhibit D - 20180215.docx Exhibit "D" CITY OF TEMECULA Page 2 of 2 Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Third Amendment to the Agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. for Animal Control Services for Fiscal Year 2021-22 PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the third amendment to the agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc., in the amount of $120,000, for animal control services within Temecula City limits, for an amended total agreement amount that shall not exceed $720,000, and to extend the term by one year through June 30, 2022. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has contracted with Animal Friends of the Valley, Inc., a non-profit organization, since 1995 for animal control services provided within Temecula City limits. In 2004, the Council approved Temecula's participation in a Joint Powers Authority referred to as the Southwest Communities Financing Authority (SCFA) with other member agencies for the construction of an animal shelter and subsequent shelter services (that now include the member cities of Temecula, Murrieta, Menifee, Lake Elsinore, Canyon Lake, Wildomar, and the County of Riverside). The SCFA contracts with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. for animal shelter operations where citizens can adopt and license pets. The animal control services agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. provides the City a complete program which includes, but is not limited to, Animal Control Officers who conduct field and other services, sheltering of lost or abandoned dogs and cats, impounding of stray animals, quarantine of rabid animals, removal of deceased animals from the public right-of-way, dog licensing, vaccination clinics, animal complaint investigation and resolution to Temecula residents, and emergency response to the City of Temecula Code Enforcement Department, Fire Department and law enforcement agencies as required. Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. has provided excellent animal care services to the City of Temecula for many years. To align the City animal control services Agreement with the current term of the SCFA shelter contract, staff recommends Council approve the amendment to the agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. extending the term by one year. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds exist in the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 operating budget for the $120,000 annual payment. ATTACHMENTS: Third Amendment to Agreement with Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS, INC. FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES THIS THIRD AMENDMENT ("Amendment") is made and entered into as of July 1, 2021 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc., a Non -Profit (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2016, the City and Contractor entered into that certain four-year Agreement entitled "Agreement for Animal Control Services," in the amount of $480,000.00. b. On April 5, 2017, the City and Contractor entered into the first Amendment to revise the Scope of Work. C. On July 1, 2020, the City and Contractor entered into the Second Amendment to extend the term of the Agreement and increase the payment in the amount of $120,000. d. The parties now desire to extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2022, revise Section 4.c and increase the payment in the amount of $120,000.00, as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2022 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The THIRD Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($120,000.00) for a total Agreement amount of Seven Hundred Twenty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($720,000.00). 4. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "c" is hereby amended to read as follows: Contractor will submit invoices monthly. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non- disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice_ For all reimbursements authorized by this 2/1712021 Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($ 50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby replaced with the revised Exhibit B set forth on Attachment "A" to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 6. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. W 7izozi IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALLEYS, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless hcorporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Aaron Adams, City Manager ATTEST: By: Randl Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: Tammi Boyd, Presi e t By: Marcene Carre', Secretary CONTRACTOR Animal Friends of the Valleys, Inc. Attn: Tammi Boyd, President 33751 Mission Trail, Wildomar, CA 92595 951-674-0618 tammi@animalfriendsofthevallevs.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: Rsy 04-12-21 3 2117f202' ATTACHMENT A Exhibit B Payment Rates and Schedule The City shall pay a flat rate to Contractor in the amount of $10,000 per month for animal control services. The cost for animal control services shall not exceed $120,000 annually for a total not to exceed Agreement amount of $720,000 for the total term of this Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided pursuant to Section 4 of this Agreement. 2/1712021 Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Community Development Director DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve First Amendment to the Loan Agreement for Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Development Between the City of Temecula, as Housing Successor to the Former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P. PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY) APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ PROJECT DESCRIPTION: A 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The Project is 100% affordable and is located in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Area. BACKGROUND: In 2015, the City as Housing Successor to the Former Redevelopment Agency obtained clearance from the Department of Finance to spend the remaining 2010 and 2011 affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds for their originally intended purpose — for the creation of affordable housing. Staff has met with many developers over the potential development of affordable housing throughout the community. On August 19, 2019, Community HousingWorks (CHW) submitted a proposal to the City to develop Las Haciendas, a 77-unit affordable residential community in the Uptown Temecula on Las Haciendas Street. This project would be the first residential project in the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan (UTSP) area. Residential development in the Uptown Temecula has the potential to be catalytic, providing the necessary residents to support future development in the area. On October 8, 2019, the Supportive Housing/Services Subcommittee, consisting of Council Members Naggar (at the time) and Rahn, met with the development team from CHW and expressed interest in moving forward with negotiations of the affordable housing project, with the contribution of affordable housing funding, deferred development impact fees (DIF), and a reimbursement from the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan New Streets In -Lieu Fee Funds for the construction a new road and alley. On December 9, 2019, the City provided a Letter of Intent (LOI) to CHW to demonstrate intent towards a partnership to increase the competitiveness of tax credit applications and establish the local commitment to the production of affordable housing. The LOI was contingent upon CHW acquiring two parcels in the UTSP area. CHW closed escrow on these two parcels on December 16, 2019. On February 11, 2020, CHW met again with the Supportive Housing/Services Subcommittee to provide an update on the entitlement process and project. On May 26, 2020, the City Council approved the original Loan Agreement for the Las Haciendas housing project. The developer is requesting the First Amendment to the Loan Agreement to allow for the extension of the term of the agreement, in order to allow for additional applications for tax credit financing through the State. The developer will apply for tax credits through 2023. The Developer is also looking to amend the closing of the City Loan to within 180 days after the award of the tax credits, which is more customary for affordable housing projects. Affordability The Project consists seventy-six affordable units that will be affordable to extremely low, very low, and low-income households, plus one manager's unit. The Project is located in the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) that was adopted by City Council in 2018. The development of the affordable units will assist in the City in meeting our Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) goals, as defined by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Because of the City's financial assistance, the Project must comply with the obligations of SB 341, which stipulates that the City, as Housing Successor to the Redevelopment Agency, must target its expenditures of affordable housing funds as follows: • At least 30% of the funds must be spent for the development of housing for extremely low income households earning 30% or less of the area median income (AMI) • No more than 20% of the funds may be spent for the development of housing affordable for households earning between 60% and 80% of the AMI • The balance of the funds may be spent for the development of housing affordable for households earning 60% or less of the AMI CHW, who created a new operating entity, Las Haciendas Housing Associates for the Project, plans to apply to the State of California for 9% Low Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC). Seventy-six of the units will be restricted per LIHTC requirements. The Developer has proposed an affordability mix competitive for an LIHTC application, as demonstrated in the following chart: Area Median Income Tax Credit CA Redevelopment Law Regulatory Agreement Regulatory Agreement Extremely Low (30% 24 12 AMI) Very Low (50% AMI) 8 18 Low Income (60% AMI) 44 7 Total Restricted Units 76 37 Per the previously approved Loan Agreement, thirty-seven of those units will be further restricted per California Redevelopment Law (CRL) and the Developer will be required to comply with CRL requirements when determining household income and affordable rent calculations. The term of affordability is fifty-five years for all units. City Financial Contribution The financing of Las Haciendas Apartments will involve the following sources: Source of Funds Amount Deferred Developer Fee $85,000 General Partner Equity Contribution $194,000 Utility Deposit Refunds $199,000 Las Haciendas Housing Associates $3,585,000 City of Temecula as Housing Successor to the $10,130,000 RDA California Tax Credit Allocation Committee $23,361,000 Total Development Costs $37,554,000 The previously approved Loan Agreement dictates that the City contribute a total of $10,130,000 toward the Project, in the form of two residual receipt loans and one reimbursement as follows: Description Amount Deferred Fee Loan $718,445 Capital Loan $8,910,698 UTSP In Lieu Fee Reimbursement $500,857 Total City Contribution $10,130,000 The Deferred Fee Loan of $718,445 consists of deferred Development Impact Fees (DIF), Quimby fees, permit fees, Public Works fees, and Fire fees for the Project, locked in at 2019-20 amounts. The Capital Loan of $8,910,698 is from the 2010 and 2011 affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds. The City loans will bear an annual interest rate of three percent, commencing on the date of disbursement. The City will receive fifty percent of residual receipts toward the repayment of City loans. Payments will be made first to pay down the Deferred Fee Loan. The UTSP New Streets In -Lieu Fee Reimbursement will be approximately $500,857. The actual reimbursement will be determined based on the costs of the completion of the new road connecting Las Haciendas and Calle Cortez, but will be no more than 1.75% of the total land acquisition and hard costs of the Project. Development and Construction Timeline (First Amendment Terms) As outlined in Exhibit H (First Amendment) to the Loan Agreement, the Developer is obligated to meet certain deadlines associated the construction of the Project: • The Developer will have until June 2023 to apply to, and secure from LIHTC, and must apply at every opportunity. The First Amendment would extend this deadline from 2022. • If the Developer is not successful in securing 9% tax credits, the Developer will have the option to apply to the California Debt Limit Allocation Committee for a tax-exempt bond to combine this source with 4% LIHTC and pursue other sources of funds. • The close of City Loan shall occur within one hundred and eighty days after the award of tax credits, but no later than December 31, 2023. The First Amendment would extend this deadline from thirty days. • Construction shall commence thirty days after the close of the City Loan and completed no later than eighteen calendar months after the commencement of construction. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This Loan Agreement was analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the proposed Loan Agreement is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15162 and 15182. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2013061012) was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is divided into six planning districts, all of which allow residential uses. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan does not contain maximum or minimum density requirements, although residential development is anticipated at a range of 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre. For planning purposes, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan assumes a residential density of 45 dwelling units per acre in all zoning districts. The proposed project that is the subject matter of the Loan Agreement proposes to construct 77 units on 2.5 acres, which is under the 45 dwelling units per acre analyzed by the EIR. As such, the environmental impacts for the project have been evaluated by the previously adopted EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. In addition, staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City Council has reviewed staff s determination of exemption and, based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staffs determination that the proposed First Amendment to the previously approved Loan Agreement is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and that no further environmental review is needed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Staff is directed to prepare a Notice of Exemption. FISCAL IMPACT: As discussed above, the previously approved Loan Agreement dictates that the City contribute a total of $10,130,000 toward the Project, in the form of two residual receipt loans and one reimbursement as follows: Description Amount Deferred Fee Loan $718,445 Capital Loan $8,910,698 UTSP In Lieu Fee Reimbursement $500,857 Total City Contribution $10,130,000 The First Amendment does not change the financial terms of the agreement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. First Amendment to Loan Agreement 3. Draft Notice of Exemption RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY) APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI -FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Recitals. The City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City") hereby finds, determines and declares that: (a) The City of Temecula entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) dated May 26, 2020. (b) The City of Temecula desires to extend the term of the agreement, and amend the time that the developer must close on the loan to 180 days. Section 2. Approval of the First Amendment. The City Council hereby approves the "FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE "LAS HACIENDAS" 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT" and authorizes the Mayor to execute said First Amendment on behalf of the City in substantially the form presented to the City Council. Section 3. Certitication. The City Cleric shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of April, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT (LAS HACIENDAS) THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT ("Amendment"), dated and effective as of March , 2021, is entered into by and between CITY OF TEMECULA, as successor to the housing assets and funds of the former Temecula Redevelopment Agency ("City"), and LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership ("Borrower"). RECITALS A. City and Borrower are parties to that certain Loan Agreement dated as of May 26, 2020 ("Agreement"). All capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings set forth in the Agreement unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. B. City and Borrower mutually desire to modify the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows: AGREEMENT 1. Amendment. Exhibit "H" to the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with the new Exhibit "H" attached to this Amendment. 2. No Other Amendments; Amendment Governs and Controls. The Agreement, as amended by this Amendment, is hereby reaffirmed. Except as expressly modified hereby, the Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect. To the extent any of the provisions of this Amendment are inconsistent with any of the provisions set forth in the Agreement, the provisions of this Amendment shall govern and control. All references in the Agreement to the "Agreement" shall mean the Agreement as amended by this Amendment. 3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. Each counterpart may be delivered by email or other electronic transmission. The signature page of any counterpart may be detached therefrom without impairing the legal effect of the signature(s) thereon provided such signature page is attached to any other counterpart identical thereto. 11086-0001\2497144v2.doe IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Borrower have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first above written. CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA am Maryann Edwards Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney BORROWER: LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership By: CHW Las Haciendas LLC, a California limited liability company, its General Partner By: Community HousingWorks, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, its Sole mber d M nager By: • A Ma r ne a�Eini, Senior Vice President 11086-0001 \2497144v2.doc EXHIBIT "H" SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE Action Date / Deadline Items 1— 8 Relate to Developer Actions and Requirements Prior to the Closing 1. Project Budget. The Developer shall Prior and as a condition to Closing. submit a comprehensive Project Budget for the Improvements. 2. Final Plans and Specifications. The Prior and as a condition to Closing. Developer shall submit the Final Plans and Specifications for City approval. 3. Building Permits. The Developer shall Prior and as a condition to the Closing. obtain the Building Permit for the construction of the Improvements. 4. Construction Contract. The Developer Prior and as a condition to the Closing. shall submit the Stipulated Sum construction contract for the construction of the Improvements to the City for approval. 5. Performance and Payment Bonds. The Prior and as a condition to the Closing. Developer shall deliver to the City copies of the required performance and payment bonds, or security in lieu thereof. 6. Insurance. The Developer shall submit Prior and as a condition to the Closing. evidence of insurance to the City. 11086-0001 \2497144v2. doe Action Date / Deadline 7. Tax Credit AWlications/Award. Developer must apply for 9% tax credits in both round in 2021 (until awarded), both round in 2022 (until awarded), and first round in 2023 and must provide evidence thereof to City, and form a limited partnership to provide for investment of tax credit -based equity, and deliver a copy of the partnership agreement to City for approval. Developer must be awarded tax credits and must provide evidence thereof to City prior (and as a condition) to Closing. In addition, in the event Developer is unsuccessful at securing 9% tax credits, the Developer shall have the option to pursue 4% tax credits during 2021, 2022, and on or before June 30, 2023 as an alternative. 8. Tax Credit Equity. All tax credit equity Prior and as a condition to Closing. must have been committed and available to pay the initial Project costs, as shown by reasonable evidence delivered to City. Items 9 —13 Relate to Closing and Re uirements After the Closing 9. Closing. The Developer shall close the Within 180 days after award of tax credits, but City Loan. not later than December 31, 2023. 10. Commencement of Construction. No later than 30 days after the Closing. Developer shall substantially commence the Improvements. 11. Completion of Grading. Developer Not later than six (6) months following the shall substantially complete the grading commencement of construction. for the Project. 12. Commencement of Vertical Not later than eight (8) months after the Construction. Developer shall commencement of construction. commence vertical construction. 13. Completion: Qualification for No later than eighteen (18) months after the Certificate of Completion. The Project commencement of construction. shall be completed and shall qualify for a Certificate of Completion. 11086-0001 \2497144v2. doc City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951 ) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov April 28, 2021 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for the First Amendment to the Loan Agreement for Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Development Between the City of Temecula, as Housing Successor to the Former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P. Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $50.00, for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506-5142. Sincerely, Luke Watson Director of Community Development Enclosures: Check Copies of this letter (2) Self-addressed stamped envelopes (2) Previous Filing Fee Receipt (if applicable) 1 CD229 C:\USERS\LEGISTAR\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECH NCLOG IES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@AOOFF4A4\@BCL@AOOFF4A4.DOCX City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: First Amendment to the Loan Agreement for Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Development Between the City of Temecula, as Housing Successor to the Former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P. Description of Project: An amendment to the previously approved Loan Agreement for Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Development Between the City of Temecula, as Housing Successor to the Former Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and Las Haciendas Housing Associates, L.P. Project Location: 28715 Las Haciendas Street, and 28772 Calle Cortez Applicant/Proponent: City of Temecula The City Council approved the above described project on April 27, 2021 and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) ❑ Ministerial (Section 21O8O(b)(1); Section 15268); ❑ Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); ❑ Emergency Project (Section 21O8O(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); ❑ Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) ❑ Categorical Exemption: (Section XXXXX, Class X,) ® Other: Section 15162 & Section 15182 Categorical Exemption Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: This Loan Agreement was analyzed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA'), the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's local CEQA Guidelines. Staff has determined that the proposed Loan Agreement is exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines 15162 and 15182. On November 17, 2015, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (SCH#2013061012) was certified in connection with the approval of the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan is divided into six planning districts, all of which allow residential uses. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan does not contain maximum or minimum density requirements, although residential development is anticipated at a range of 20 to 60 dwelling units per acre. For planning purposes, the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan assumes a residential density of 45 dwelling units per acre in all zoning districts. The proposed project that is the subject matter of the Loan Agreement proposes to construct 77 units on 2.5 acres, which is under the 45 dwelling units per acre analyzed by the EIR. As such, the environmental impacts for the project have been evaluated by the previously adopted EIR for the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan, and no further environmental review is necessary. None of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 exist to require any additional environmental review and no further documentation is necessary. In addition, staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan. The City Council has reviewed staff's determination of exemption and, based on its own independent judgment, concurs in staffs determination that the proposed First Amendment to the previously approved Loan 2 CD229 C:\USERS\LEGISTAR\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECH NOLOG IES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@AOOFF4A4\@BCL@AOOFF4A4.DOCX Agreement is exempt from CEQA pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and that no further environmental review is needed pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. Contact Person/Title: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst Telephone Number (951) 506-5142 Signature: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: 3 CD229 C:\USERS\LEGISTAR\APPDATA\LOCAL\TEMP\BCL TECH NOLOG IES\EASYPDF 8\@BCL@AOOFF4A4\@BCL@AOOFF4A4.DOCX Item No. 10 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Funding Agreement Between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and City of Temecula PREPARED BY: Betsy Lowrey, Assistant to the City Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve funding agreement between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("SJVAPCD") and City of Temecula ("City"). BACKGROUND: The City is informed that its application for a reimbursement grant through the California Volkswagen Mitigation Trust (VW Trust) in the amount of $160,000 is tentatively approved pending execution of the attached Funding Agreement, which outlines the terms of the grant. As part of the grant process, the City will purchase an all -electric, zero -emission shuttle bus for City transportation seating groups up to 16 individuals including 2 wheelchair positions. The new electric bus will not consume any gasoline, and is powered entirely by electric charge, which makes it economical in terms of future operational costs (no gasoline), and environmentally sustainable with zero emissions. The Temecula Community Services Department, Human Services Division, will have oversight of the new electric bus which will be stored at, and used primarily for activities managed by, the Mary Phillips Senior Center. However, the bus will be available to other City departments as needed. Its electric drive -range is approximately 150 miles, which is conducive for shuttle needs within the City and nearby surroundings. The cost of the bus is approximately $211,000 and SJVAPCD will agree to reimburse the City $160,000 through the VW Trust upon proof that, within 60 days of receiving the new electric bus, the City's existing 2006 gasoline bus is dismantled (and permanently incapable of functioning) by a scrap yard authorized by SJVAPCD, and the appropriate documentation is filed with the Department of Motor Vehicles. It is estimated that the cost to dismantle/destroy the City's 2006 gasoline bus will be less than $2,000. Upon reimbursement, the net cost of the new all -electric bus will be approximately $53,000 plus the cost of approximately $12,000 for an electric charging station (if not funded by secondary grant) as follows: $210,928 Cost of new all -electric bus $12,072 Approximate cost for 70 amp/Level 2 Electric charging station, unless funded by a secondary grant $2,000 Approximate cost to dismantle the City's existing 2006 gasoline bus $225,000 Anticipated Budget Appropriation ($160,000) (Grant Reimbursement) $65,000 Approximate Net Cost FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available within FY20-21, account 190.181.999.5610, for the expenditure of the electric bus/charging station. The grant reimbursement revenue in the amount of $160,000 that is anticipated for the electric bus will be allocated to account 190.181.4076. ATTACHMENTS: Funding Agreement between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District and City of Temecula. PLEASE READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE YOU SIGN YOUR CONTRACT 1. Your agreement is not yet executed. DO NOT purchase, install, or in any way take possession of the reduced -emission technology until you are notified that your agreement has been executed. Agreements are executed after signatures from all parties involved (Applicants and SJVAPCD) have been obtained. 2. Please print and have the signing authority sign the signature page of the contract offer attached. 3. Do not date or place any stamps, stray marks or written comments on the contract. The contract will be dated when the final signature is received. 4. Return the signature page of the contract and any additional forms included in this packet. 5. Please email, fax, or mail the signature page and any additional forms via one of the following: Email: grantsCaD_valleyair.org Fax: (559) 230-6112 Mail: 1990 E. Gettysburg Ave., Fresno, CA 93726 6. Staff will route the signed contract offer for District's signatures and approval once signature pages are received. 7. The contract is fully executed and dated after it is signed by all parties (applicant and District). 8. Applicant will receive a copy of the executed contract. 9. A payment procedures packet will be included along with your executed contract. Office hours are Monday — Thursday from 7:30 am — 5:30 pm and every other Friday from 8:00 am — 5:00 pm Agreement G-100357A 1 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY UNIFIED AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund Transit Bus FUNDING AGREEMENT This Agreement, made this day of , 2021, between the San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District ("District") and City of Temecula ("Participant"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project ("the Project") is one of the eligible projects included in California's Beneficiary Mitigation Plan, developed to summarize how the State of California plans to use the VW Mitigation Trust Funds allocated under the Environmental Mitigation Trust that resulted from the Volkswagen "defeat device" settlement; and WHEREAS, past and future excess NOx emissions emitted from Volkswagen vehicles are intended to be mitigated, in part, by the Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project, which also assists in furthering the State's long-term goals; and WHEREAS, the Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project provides funding to be used toward the purchase of new zero -emission replacement buses for owners of transit, school, and shuttle buses, to mitigate excess NOx emissions, reduces pollution in disadvantaged and low-income communities, supports advanced technology vehicle and equipment deployments and accelerates the zero -emission transformation of the heavy-duty fleet; and WHEREAS, the District is the Project Administrator for using VW Mitigation Trust Funds to replace eligible used transit, school, and shuttle buses throughout the State in accordance with the Project Agreement and Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund Implementation Manual; and WHEREAS, Participant has submitted an application for funding under the Project, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, Participant has reviewed and is familiar with the Program Guidelines, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B, and agrees to adhere to them; and G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 NOW, THEREFORE, based on their mutual promises, covenants, and conditions, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. PROJECT The purpose of this Agreement is to provide incentives to Participants in the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust. Under this program, District provides cash incentives to be used toward the purchase of new zero -emission replacement buses. Participant shall receive Project funding from the VW Mitigation Trust Fund, administered by District, to be applied towards the purchase of a new, Project -eligible electric transit replacement bus (hereinafter the "new bus"), to replace Participant's current internal combustion engine transit bus (hereinafter the "current bus"), for use primarily within the state of California. Participant has agreed to undertake such participation through their submission of their application, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. 2. DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE(S) A. Funding under this Agreement shall be utilized by Participant for the purchase of the following new electric Replacement; hereinafter the "new bus;" to replace Participant's current Replacement; hereinafter the "current bus." Specifications for the current bus and the new bus, including the specifications for the motor, are identified in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein. B. No payment shall be made toward the new replacement bus other than as listed in § 2.A. C. Participant agrees that the current bus as listed in Exhibit B, as the vehicle to be replaced, will be permanently removed from operation, dismantled and reported to the California Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) as a dismantled bus. ■ Definition of "dismantle" for the purpose of this Agreement, is as follows: to punch, crush, stamp, hammer, shred, or otherwise render permanently and irreversibly incapable of functioning as originally intended, any vehicle or vehicle part. 3. OBLIGATIONS OF DISTRICT A. District shall provide up to $160,000.00 of VW Mitigation Trust Funds to Participant for the purchase of one (1) new bus as indicated in § 2.A, and not to exceed the funding levels specified in the Guidelines, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit C. B. District shall make payment to Participant upon receipt and verification of a properly supported Claim for Payment including itemized invoices. 2 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 C. Funding shall only be allowed toward the purchase of the new bus described in § 2.A, which complies with the VW Mitigation Trust Fund and all program requirements, which must be met for the full three (3) year Project Implementation Phase. D. Payment will be issued upon verification that the new bus is purchased and program eligible including, but not limited to, verification that the new vehicle is California Highway Patrol (CHP) safety certified (for school buses only), insured, and operating. 4. AGREEMENT TERM A. Project Completion Phase — Participant shall take delivery and place the new bus into service within eighteen (18) months of the effective date of this Agreement, as indicated on Page 1, Paragraph 1. This includes dismantling the current bus and placement of the new replacement bus into service. B. Claim for Payment Request for Reimbursement: Participant shall submit a complete claim for payment request to be reimbursed for the purchase of the new bus within eighteen (18) months of the effective date of this Agreement, as indicated in Page 1, Paragraph 1. The claim for payment request must be made through the VW Mitigation Trust Fund website at: http://vwbusmoney.valleyair.org C. Project Implementation Phase — Participant shall own, operate, and maintain the new electric bus according to the terms of this Agreement for a period of not less than three (3) years from the date in which the new electric bus is first placed into service. Participant agrees to cooperate with District in implementation, monitoring, enforcement, and other efforts to assure the emissions benefits are real, quantifiable, surplus, and enforceable. D. If Participant cannot meet the eighteen (18) month Project Completion Phase, Participant must notify District in writing with justification explaining why the Project Completion Phase cannot be met. District will review the request and determine, in its sole discretion, whether to amend the Agreement to account for Participant's written request. Participant agrees to amend the Agreement as necessary, if requested by District, to ensure the project is completed in a timely manner. Though District agrees it will not unreasonably deny Participant's request, Participant understands that even with written justification; District does not guarantee an amendment will be made to the Agreement to adjust Project Implementation Phase, and expressly reserves the right to deny such request. Participant may be subject to conditions in § 8 for noncompliance with Project Completion Terms. E. Participant will meet the following milestones unless prior arrangements have been submitted to District and approved in writing: 3 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 ■ Purchase Order Milestone: A copy of the purchase order must be submitted to District within ninety (90) days of the contract execution, unless otherwise authorized by District. ■ Implementation Milestone: Entire project must be completed, and claim for payment submitted, within eighteen (18) months of the date of contract execution, unless otherwise authorized by District. ■ Date of Delivery Milestone: The estimated delivery date of the new bus. ■ Scrapping of Current Bus Milestone: Participant must scrap the current bus within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the new bus by rendering the current bus permanently and irreversibly incapable of functioning as originally intended. ■ Annual Report Milestone: Participant must supply the requested report information annually for a period of three (3) years from the date the new bus is placed into service. ■ Record Retention Milestone: Participant must retain project documentation for the contract term plus three (3) years after contract term. Milestone Name Milestone Timeframe Purchase Order Submitted within 90 days of contract execution Implementation Completed within 18 months of contract execution Estimated Delivery Within 12 months of Purchase Order date Current Bus Scrapping Within 60 days of receipt of new bus Annual Report 12, 24, 36 months after new bus in service Record Retention Six 6 ears from contract execution 5. REPORTING A. Participant affirms that the information reported on the current bus, as identified is Exhibit B, is true and accurate. B. Participant shall submit annual reports on new bus operation, annual miles traveled, program participation rates, identified problems and proposed solutions, maintenance and any other pertinent information requested by District on a form to be provided to Participant by District. Participant must submit annual reports each year for the duration of the Project Implementation Phase as described in § 4.C. C. Annual reports are due at 12, 24, and 36 months after the date that the new bus in this project is in service. D. Noncompliance with the reporting requirements shall require on -site monitoring by District personnel. 4 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 E. District reserves the right to monitor and enforce the terms of this Agreement at any time during the Project Implementation Phase as described in § 4.0 and for a period of three (3) years after. 6. OBLIGATIONS OF PARTICIPANT A. Participant shall purchase the new bus specified in § 2.A and indicated in Exhibit B. It is the responsibility of Participant to ensure the new bus purchased through this Agreement meets all program eligibility requirements. Participant must ensure the new bus purchased through this Agreement adheres to all the requirements set forth in § 2.A. If Participant purchases a new bus that does not meet program requirements, District may deny the disbursement of project funds. B. If the new bus is a school bus, the new bus must undergo a CHP safety certification inspection after its purchase and prior to transporting children. C. The new bus shall be operated and maintained according to the manufacturer's specifications. D. In the event Participant does not complete the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase required by this Agreement, Participant shall refund to District a pro -rated incentive amount. E. If necessary, Participant shall obtain through other sources sufficient additional funds to purchase the new bus specified herein. F. In the event Participant cannot obtain sufficient funds to complete the purchase of the new bus, District reserves the right to terminate this Agreement. In that event, if requested by District, Participant shall return any District funds received. G. All forms and documents necessary for the submission of the claim for payment for reimbursement will be available at: http://vwbusmoney.valleyair.org. Participant must submit all necessary forms and documents required for reimbursement to District through the website at- http://vwbusmoney.vallevair.org. H. The following records are required for payments. No payments will be made until the following documents are submitted to District: ■ The vendor delivers of the eligible replacement bus to Participant. ■ Participant dismantles the current bus through an approved dismantler. ■ District receives itemized invoices from Participant. ■ District receives proof that the current bus has been scrapped: the current bus must be scrapped within 60 days of the receipt of the new bus and proof of scrap must be provided before District can make any payments. 5 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 ■ District receives self -certification from Participant that match funds are not either: (1) from funding sources where any portion of the resulting NOx reductions could be double counted, including but not limited to Carl Moyer Program, AB923, and AB617; or (2) from the Hybrid and Zero Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). ■ Participant provides a copy of the Department of Motor Vehicle registration for the new vehicle to District. ■ The documentation of the new vehicle and verification of the new vehicle specifications have been provided to District. ■ (For school buses only) CHP has inspected the school bus and has completed written documentation signifying that the school bus is safe to operate with children aboard and the applicant has provided a copy of the documentation to District. Initial Reporting by Participant will include, but is not limited to: ■ Current bus information, ■ New bus information, ■ Funding information (including match funding amounts and sources), ■ Selected applicant information, and ■ Supporting documentation needed such as engine serial numbers, data tag photos, etc. J. Participant must complete the Disclosure of Funds form, self -certifying that match funds are not either: (1) from funding sources where any portion of the resulting NOx reductions could be double counted, including but not limited to Carl Moyer Program, AB923, and AB617; or (2) from the Hybrid and Zero Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP). K. Participant must scrap the current bus with a VW Mitigation Trust Fund approved dismantler within sixty (60) days of the receipt of the new bus by rendering the current bus permanently and irreversibly incapable of functioning as originally intended. VW Mitigation Trust Fund approved dismantlers can be found at- http://vwbusmoney.vallevair.org. L. Payment for Scrap: Income for scrap is not allowed. District will allow Participant to receive payment for scrap under the following conditions: ■ Participant provides to District the receipt for any scrap payment showing the amount of funds received from the dismantler. ■ District will reduce the VW Mitigation Trust Funds awarded to Participant by the scrap payment amount if the scrap amount, plus VW Mitigation Trust Funds amount, plus match exceeds the new bus purchase price. 0 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 District and Participant will retain documentation of any scrap payment as part of the project record. M. Participant agrees to maintain the new bus per the manufacturer's specifications. N. District shall only reimburse Participant for project costs incurred on or after the date of execution and subject to the provision limits in Project Expenditure Limitations Section of the VW Mitigation Trust Fund Guidelines. Funds will be disbursed within 30 days of District's receipt and approval of all required documentation. 7. GENERAL CONDITIONS A. Participant agrees that as of the date of execution of this Agreement, it has not yet purchased and/or received delivery of the new bus. B. Participant agrees that, for the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase plus three (3) years, District shall be allowed upon request to inspect the new replacement bus and/or records relating to the new bus including but not limited to those listed in Exhibit C. C. Participant agrees that the gross vehicle weight rating of the new bus shall be 14,001 pounds or greater. D. Participant agrees that the new bus shall, by a test method approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) or the California Air Resources Board (CARB), be new and certified for sale in California, or under an experimental permit for operation in California, and must be a part of the Hybrid and Zero -Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) eligible vehicle catalog, unless previously approved in writing by District and CARB. The new bus shall meet or exceed said requirements. E. Participant agrees and represents that the new bus will operate primarily within the state of California and shall remain so for the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase. F. Participant acknowledges that they are prohibited from making or allow any modifications to the vehicle's emissions control systems, hardware, or software calibrations, (Vehicle Code Section 27156), and not install any combustion source such as a fuel fired heater. G. Participant waives all rights to any emission reduction credits that may accrue as a result of purchase of the new bus. Any such potential credits shall be the sole property of the VW Mitigation Trust Fund. 7 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 H. If Participant intends to sell or transfer ownership of the new bus in this Agreement during the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase specified in paragraph 4(C), Participant must notify and receive approval from District prior to the sale or transfer of the new bus. In the event Participant sells or transfers ownership of said new bus to a buyer outside of the state of California during the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase specified in paragraph 4(BC), Participant shall return, if requested by District, pro -rated incentive funds to District. District reserves the right to reduce the incentive amount if it is determined that the actual costs paid by Participant are less than the costs indicated on the Application, as indicated in Exhibit A and Exhibit B, or if the incentive amount exceeds the funding levels specified in the Guidelines, as identified in Exhibit C. Additionally, District reserves the right to disallow certain ineligible costs submitted on the Claim for Payment and thereby reduce the incentive amount. A determination of cost eligibility will be at the sole discretion of District. J. Participant agrees that the project will comply with the Volkswagen Environmental Mitigation Trust Fund Guidelines and shall meet all program requirements for the three (3) year Project Implementation Phase of the Agreement, all of which are incorporated herein by reference. K. For projects involving installation or construction of infrastructure, Participant agrees that only licensed professionals will be used to perform services under this Agreement where such services are called for and licensed professionals are required for those services under state law. L. If applicable, Participant agrees to be bound by all the provisions of State Labor Code Section 1771 regarding prevailing wages. If applicable, Participant shall monitor all services subject to reimbursement from this Agreement to ensure that the prevailing wage provisions of State Labor Code Section 1771 are being met. M. Participant shall be responsible for work and for persons or entities engaged in work, including, but not limited to, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and providers of services. Participant shall be responsible for any and all disputes arising out of its contracts for work funded by this Agreement, including, but not limited to, payment disputes with contractors, subcontractors, and providers of services. District will not mediate disputes between Participant and any other entity concerning responsibility for performance of work. 8. REPERCUSSIONS FOR NONPERFORMANCE A. Participant must operate the new bus purchased through this Agreement according to the terms of the Agreement and cooperate with District and CARB in implementation, monitoring, enforcement, and other efforts to assure the emission benefits are real, quantifiable, surplus, and enforceable. 8 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 B. Repercussions for noncompliance with the requirements, terms, and conditions set forth in this Agreement shall result in, including but not limited to, District cancelling the Agreement with Participant and recapturing project funds in proportion to any loss of emissions reductions as agreed to in this Agreement. C. District and CARB have authority to seek any remedies available under the law for noncompliance with VW Mitigation Trust Fund requirements and nonperformance with the Agreement. District may consider unforeseen circumstances beyond Participant's control in determining repercussions for nonperformance. D. CARB, as an intended third party beneficiary, reserves the right to enforce the terms of this Agreement at any time during the contract term to ensure emission reductions are obtained. 9. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR In performance of the work, duties, and obligations assumed by Participant under this Agreement, it is mutually understood and agreed that Participant, including any and all of Participant's officers, agents, and employees, shall act in an independent capacity and not as an officer, agent, servant, employee, joint venture, partner, or associate of District. 10. INSURANCE Participant shall insure the new bus in an amount not less than the full replacement value of the bus and provide satisfactory evidence of such insurance to District. The evidence shall be provided at the time of claim and with the annual report through the full three (3) year Implementation Phase of this Agreement. 11. FUNDING OUT The terms of this Agreement and the services to be provided hereunder are contingent on the approval and receipt of funds by the appropriating government agency. Should sufficient funds not be allocated, the services provided may be modified or this Agreement terminated at any time by giving Participant thirty (30) days' prior written notice. 12. NON ASSIGNMENT Neither party shall assign, transfer, or subcontract this Agreement, nor their rights or duties under this Agreement, without the prior express, written consent of the other party. 0 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 13. TERMINATION District may immediately suspend or terminate this Agreement, in whole or in part, or withhold payment where District determines there is: A. An illegal or improper use of funds; B. A failure to comply with any term of this Agreement; or C. A substantially incorrect or incomplete report submitted to District. In no event shall any payment by District constitute a waiver by District of any breach of this Agreement or any default that may then exist on the part of Participant. Neither shall such payment impair or prejudice any remedy available to District with respect to the breach or default. District shall have the right to demand of Participant the repayment to District of any funds disbursed to Participant under this Agreement that, in the judgment of District, were not expended in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Participant shall promptly refund any such funds upon demand. In addition to immediate suspension or termination, District may impose any other remedies available by law, in equity, or otherwise specified in this Agreement. 14. INDEMNIFICATION Participant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the District, State and CARB and their respective officers, employees, agents, representatives, and successors in interest against any and all liability, loss, and expense, including reasonable attorneys' fees, from any and all claims for injury or damages arising out of the performance by Participant, and/or out of the operation of equipment that is purchased with trust funds. 15. RECORD KEEPING Participant shall maintain records sufficient to provide, on an annual basis for the full term of this Agreement, information regarding annual mileage, fuel usage, general maintenance details, and any other available information that may be deemed pertinent to the evaluation of the program. Participant shall agree to maintain such records for possible audit for a minimum of the Agreement term plus three (3) years. Participant shall agree to allow the auditor(s) access to such records during normal business hours and to allow interviews of any employees who might reasonably have information related to such records. Further, Participant agrees to include a similar right to the State and CARB to audit records and interview staff in any subcontract related to performance of the Agreement. This includes the right to review and to copy any records and supporting documentation pertaining to the performance of the Agreement — this includes programmatic and fiscal records and documentation. On -going Recordkeeping and Reporting will include: ■ Participant must supply the required information annually and for three (3) years after contract term, including: 10 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 The new bus mileage at 12, 24, and 36 months after date the new bus is in service, ■ Self -certify that the bus is still owned by Participant, and ■ Self -certify that the bus is still in operation in California. 16. AVAILABILITY OF DATA District will make project documentation, records, reports, and other material available to CARB upon request and as needed to respond to legislative inquiries. District will make data summaries available to the public in response to data requests. 17. NOTICES The persons and their addresses having authority to give and receive notices under this Agreement are as follows: PARTICIPANT DISTRICT Aaron Adams Samir Sheikh City Manager Executive Director/APCO 41000 Main Street 1990 E. Gettysburg Avenue Temecula, CA 92590 Fresno, California 93726 Any and all notices between District and Participant provided for or permitted under this Agreement or by law shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly served when personally delivered to one of the parties, or in lieu of such personal service, when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, addressed to such party. 18. CONFLICT OF INTEREST No officer, employee, or agent of District who exercises any function or responsibility for planning and carrying out the services provided under this Agreement shall have any direct or indirect personal financial interest in this Agreement. Participant shall comply with all federal and state conflict of interest laws, statutes, and regulations, which shall be applicable to all parties and beneficiaries under this Agreement and any officer, agent, or employee of District. 19. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of California. Venue for any action arising out of this Agreement shall only be in Fresno County, California. 11 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 20. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS Participant shall comply will all federal and state laws, statutes, regulations, rules, and guidelines which apply to its performance under this Agreement, including California driving eligibility and financial liability laws. 21. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE It is understood that for Participant's performance under this Agreement, time is of the essence. Participant will, to the reasonable satisfaction of District, complete all activities provided herein within the time schedule outlined in this Agreement, provided that Participant is not caused unreasonable delay in such performance. District reserves the right to cancel the Agreement if the owner does not execute it in a timely manner. 22. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between Participant and District with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all previous negotiations, proposals, commitments, writings, advertisements, publications, and understandings of any nature whatsoever unless expressly included in this Agreement. 23. MODIFICATION Any matters of this Agreement may be modified from time to time by the written consent of all the parties without in any way affecting the remainder. 24. NO FINANCIAL THIRD -PARTY BENEFICIARIES Notwithstanding anything else stated to the contrary herein, it is understood that Participant's services and activities under this Agreement are being rendered only for the benefit of District, and no other person, firm, corporation, or entity shall be deemed an intended financial third -party beneficiary of this Agreement. 25. SEVERABILITY In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, such holding shall not affect any other provisions of this Agreement, and the Agreement shall then be construed as if such unenforceable provisions are not a part hereof. 12 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 26. AUDIT District reserves the right to audit and enforce the terms of this Agreement at any time during the agreement term plus three (3) years. Additionally, District shall be permitted to inspect the project equipment during the entire Agreement term plus three (3) years and as long as it is still in use after the Agreement term. 27. FORCE MAJEURE Neither District nor Participant shall be liable for or deemed to be in default for any delay or failure in performance under this Agreement or interruption of services resulting, directly or indirectly, from acts of God, enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, strikes, lockouts, labor disputes, fire, or other casualty, etc. 28. NON-DISCRIMINATION During the performance of this Agreement, Participant and its contractors shall not unlawfully discriminate against, harass, or allow harassment against any employee or applicant for employment because of sex, race, religion, color, national origin, ancestry, disability, sexual orientation, medical condition, marital status, age (over 40) or allow denial of family -care leave, medical -care leave, or pregnancy -disability leave. Participant and its contractors shall ensure that the evaluation and treatment of their employees and applicants for employment are free of such discrimination and harassment. 13 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 PARTICIPANT City of Temecula Aaron Adams City Manager DISTRICT San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Craig Pedersen Governing Board Chair Recommended for approval: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Samir Sheikh Executive Director/APCO Approved as to legal form: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Annette A. Ballatore District Counsel Approved as to accounting form: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Mehri Barati, C.P.A. Director of Administrative Services For accounting use only: San Joaquin Valley Unified Air Pollution Control District Program: Account No.: 14 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 EXHIBIT A COPY OF APPLICATION G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 Project No. G-100357 Califnrnia Mitigation Trust Zero -Emission Shuttle Bus Application Applicant Information Received Date/Time: 9/18/2020 4:22 PM 1. Applicant Type: Government 2. Applicant Name (as it will appear on the contract and IRS W9): City of Temecula 3. Physical Address: 41000 Main Street 4. City: 5. State: 6. ZIP Code: Temecula CA 92590 7. Mailing Address (if different from above): 8. City: 9. State: 10. ZIP Code: 11. County of Operation: 12. Tax ID Riverside 33-0383649 Primary Contact Information 1. First Name: 2. Last Name: Stacey Brown 3. Title: 4. F-Mail: Office Aide III, City Manager's Office stacey.brown@temeculaca.gov =1��06-511 Number: 6. Alternate Contact Number: 7. Fax Number: 00 (951) 506-5100 Aurn 1. First Name: 2. Last Name: Aaron Adams 3. Title: 4. F-Mail: City Manager aaronadams@temeculca.gov 5. Phone Number: 6. Alternate Contact Number: 7. Fax Number: (951) 506-5100 (951) 506-5100 Old Bus Information 1. Bus Identification Number: 0136 2. Bus Storage Address: 41375 McCabe Court 3. City, State, Zip Code: Temecula, CA 92590 4. Total Mileage: 146884 6. Percent of Miles Traveled within CA: 100.0 8. Bus Model: THOR 290 AERO ELITE 10. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR): 9979 12. License Plate Number: 1213639 13. Bus Type: special mobility services Engine Information 5. Annual Mileage for the Bus: 17000 7. Bus Make: GENERAL MOTORS 9. Bus Model Year: 2006 11. Vehicle Identification Number (VIN): 1 GBG5V1 E751F513455 1. Engine Make: 2. Engine Model: CHEVROLET C5500/C5V042 3. Engine Model Year: 4. Horsepower: 2006 340 5. Engine Serial Number: 5GMX H08.1503 6. EPA -Certified Family Name (e.g., XCEXH0123MAH): 7. Two Stroke Engine: TBD No 8. Displacement: 9. Fuel Type: 0.81 Gasoline 10. If this has a retrofitted DPF, please list the DPF make, model and serial number: Application Page 2 of 4 New Electric Bus Information 1. New Bus Make: 2. New Bus Model: GreenPower EV Star ADA 3. New Bus Model Year: 4. GVWR: 2019 14330 5. New Bus Type: special mobility services 6. Range of Electric Bus (in Miles): 7. Total Cost of New Bus: 150 210927.75 Proposed New Electric Motor Information �1. Motor Make: 2. Motor Model: TM4 Prestolite �TZ290XSPEUONH 3. Motor Model Year: 4. Horsepower: 2019 201 5. EPA -Certified Family Name (e.g., XCEXH0123MAH): KGPC2VOCVGPB Electric Bus Charging Station 1. Do you require charging station installation or upgrades to support this bus? Yes New Electric Bus Dealer Information 1. Dealership Name: GreenPower Motor Company 2. Address: 1700 Hope Avenue 3. City: 4. State: S. Zip Code: Porterville CA 93257 6. Contact Name: 7. Contact E-Mail: Michael Perez michael@greenpowerbus.com 8. Contact Phone Number: 9. Contact Fax Number: (909) 308-0967 10. May we share your project information directly with the Dealer? Yes or No Yes Application Page 3 of 4 Signature Form Signing Authority Certifications By signing this Certifications form, I certify that I have read and understand the Eligibility Criteria and Application Guidelines document and agree to adhere to its requirements. Additionally, by signing this Certifications form, I certify to the statements and agree to adhere to the terms and conditions described below: 1. The emission reductions obtained through this program are not required by any federal, state, or local regulation, memorandum of agreement/understanding (MOA/MOU) with a regulatory agency, settlement agreement, mitigation requirement, or other legal mandate. 2. Projects funded by VW Mitigation Trust Funds will not be used as marketable emission reduction credits, to offset any emission reduction obligation, or for credit under any federal or state emission averaging, banking and trading program. In addition, projects funded through this program may not be used to generate a compliance extension or extra credit for determining regulatory compliance. 3. Proposed project has not received funding or is not under agreement with any other air district, ARB, or any other public agency. Any current financial incentive that directly reduces the project cost; including tax credits or deductions, grants, or other public financial assistance for the same engine or equipment; must be disclosed. 4. Any funding received, including funding from other sources, combined with this grant must not exceed the full cost of the new bus. 5. The bus within this application is based within the state of California and operate within the state of California for at least three (3) years from the date the new bus is purchased, unless prior written authorization has been granted by the SJVAPCD to travel outside of the state of California. 6. During the previous 24 months, at least 51% of the total usage of this bus was within California. 7. Bus identified in this application is currently in compliance with any State of California regulations. 8. Applicant understands the VW Mitigation Trust Project Administrator (SJVPACD), CARB, or their designee maintains the right to inspect the bus at any time during the agreement period. 9. Applicant will not order, purchase, make payment, or take delivery of the new bus without an executed agreement from the VW Mitigation Trust Funds. I hereby certify that all information provided in this application and any attachments are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Aaron Adams Signing Authority Signature 9/18/2020 Date Application Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B DESCRIPTION OF VEHICLE G-100357-A1 City of Temecula Current Bus New Bus Make: General Motors GreenPower Model: 290 Aero Elite EV Star VIN: 1GBG5V1E75F513455 Year: 2006 2020 Fleet ID: 06 136 Current Engine New Engine Make: General Motors TM4 Prestolite Model: CC5V042 PMSM Serial #: ECRGN291451084293 Year: 2005 2020 HP: 340 201 GVWR: 22,000 14,330 EPA Family Name: 5GMXH08.1503 LGPC2VOCVGPM Fuel: GS ELECTRIC Equipment Usage Average Annual Mileage: 17,000 Geographic Area: Riverside Project Life (reporting length): 3 Estimated Eligible Cost' Grant Amount 2,3 $210,927.75 1 $160,000.00 Estimated Total Cost may differ from the final invoice amount. 2 Grant amount cannot exceed the funding levels specified in the Guidelines (Exhibit C) 3 Funding amounts for non -government owned transit, school, and shuttle buses must not exceed 75 percent of project costs 16 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 EXHIBIT C Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund Guidelines 17 G-100357-A1 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund April 2020 Mitigation Trust Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund Guidelines Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project Table of Contents I. Project Overview........................................................................................ 1 II. Project Requirements................................................................................ 1 A. Application Requirements.......................................................................... 1 B. Eligible Applicants...................................................................................... 2 C. Requirements for the Old Bus.................................................................... 2 D. Requirements for the New Bus.................................................................. 3 E. Project Expenditures.................................................................................. 3 F. Project Expenditure Limitations.................................................................4 G. Match Funding (Co-Funding).....................................................................5 H. Payment for Scrap..................................................................................... 5 L. Vehicle Purchasers....................................................................................6 M. Resale of Vehicles..................................................................................... 8 N. Vehicle Leasing or Rental Agencies.......................................................... 9 III. Project Non-Performance.......................................................................... 9 1. Table of Figures Table 1: Maximum Funding Expenditures per Bus..........................................................4 Table 2: Maximum -Funding Expenditures per Entity, per Installment ............................. 4 Table 3: Processing Flow Chart...................................................................................... 6 Volkswagen Mitigation Trust Fund Guidelines Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project I. Project Overview The Zero -Emission Transit, School and Shuttle Bus Project provides funding for new zero -emission replacement buses for owners of transit, school, and shuttle buses. This project mitigates excess NOx emissions, reduces pollution in disadvantaged and low-income communities, supports advanced technology vehicle and equipment deployments and accelerates the zero -emission transformation of the heavy-duty fleet. Applicants will complete the application and meet the other requirements of the project such as submitting required documentation, scrapping the old vehicle, and complying with reporting requirements. II. Project Requirements A. Application Requirements 1. Applications: The applicant for transit, school and shuttle buses must apply through the online application portal for each individual bus. 2. Statewide: Applications must be submitted for each individual bus through the web based application portal from entities that own buses domiciled in California and operate primarily within the state of California. a. Applicants must receive prior written authorization from the SJVAPCD for new buses that will travel outside of the state of California at any time during their contract life. 3. First come, first served: Applications will be selected on a first come, first served basis based off a complete and eligible application per bus, subject to the maximum funding expenditures per Entity specified in Table 2: Maximum - Funding Expenditures per Entity 4. Authorization for submittal: Applicants must obtain authorization for the submittal of the applications and identification of the individual authorized to implement the bus purchase project. 5. Multiple buses allowed: Applicants must submit a separate application for each individual bus to be replaced. 6. Prior Purchases: Applicants must not purchase, make down payments, become financially committed, or take possession of the new replacement bus under funding consideration prior to the issuance of a completely executed contract that is signed by all parties — doing so will render the project ineligible. a. A fully refundable deposit is allowed, as long as it is clearly stated that the deposit is fully refundable 7. Information for reports: Applicants must include information needed to fulfill the reporting requirements in Project Reporting 8. Information to determine eligibility: Applicants must submit required documentation to determine eligibility of the applicant and of the old bus. B. Eligible Applicants 1. Eligible Applicants are owners of transit buses, school buses and shuttle buses. 2. Indian Tribes are eligible for this program. In addition, Indian Tribes Beneficiaries (i.e., for federally -recognized Indian Tribes) have entered into their own Environmental Mitigation Trust Agreement. For more information, please visit the Volkswagen Diesel Emissions Environmental Mitigation Trust site at: https://www.vwenvironmentalmitigationtrust.com/tribe-trust 3. Agencies that are the lessors that lease or rent applicable transit, school and shuttle buses to third parties may apply, however, additional requirements must be met. These requirements are specified in Vehicle Leasing or Rental Agencies C. Requirements for the Old Bus 1. Only buses with internal combustion engines are eligible 2. Fuel type of the old bus can be gasoline, diesel, or compressed natural gas (CNG), or propane. 3. Engine Model Year of the old school bus must be 2006 or older 4. Engine Model Year of the old transit or shuttle bus must be 2009 or older 5. Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) must be 14,001 pounds or greater 6. Current California Highway Patrol (CHP) certification for school buses is required 7. All old school buses may be eligible regardless of their compliance with the Truck and Bus Regulation. However, noncompliant school buses are subject to additional funding limitations specified in Project Expenditure Limitations 8. Compliance with the Truck and Bus Regulation must be submitted with the application. Acceptable documentation includes, but is not limited to, any of the following: a. Invoice(s) for the purchase of the Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) and its installation on the old bus specified on the application. b. Pictures of the DPF on the bus engine specified on the application. The pictures must be able to identify both the DPF and the old bus. c. CHP 292 school bus safety inspection of the installed DPF on the old bus 2 specified on the application. d. Compliance certificate from CARB TRUCRS database. D. Requirements for the New Bus 1. Zero emission: Hydrogen fuel cell and battery electric -powered vehicle technologies are eligible projects. Eligible buses must be listed as an Eligible Vehicle for the Hybrid and Zero -Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) and listed on the HVIP website at www.californiahvip.org . SJVAPCD may consider other zero emission technologies for eligibility on a case by case basis, subject to approval by the California Air Resources Board (GARB). 2. New Vehicle: The vehicle must be a new vehicle as defined in California Vehicle Code Section 430. 3. Not converted: SJVAPCD and CARB does not consider a new vehicle to be a new chassis that has been converted with aftermarket parts or equipment to create a zero -emission vehicle, unless the completed zero emission vehicle has obtained CARB new vehicle certification. Eligible vehicles (and vehicle chassis) must be new and not yet have been registered in any state or paid for by the purchaser (other than a vehicle down payment). Used vehicles (including vehicles used by dealers, manufacturers, or other entities or for demonstration purposes) are not eligible. 4. GVWR 14,001 pounds or greater: Zero -emission vehicle makes/models must be 14,001 pounds GVWR or greater. 5. CARB certified: The manufacturer must have obtained CARB approval/certification of the vehicle model. 6. HVIP eligible: Stacking VW Mitigation Trust Funds with HVIP funds is prohibited. For additional information regarding match funding, please see section Match Fundin 7. CHP certification: Current CHP 292 certification is required for the new school bus. E. Project Expenditures 1. Eligible Costs: Eligible costs include purchase price and taxes for new eligible buses. 2. Maximum Project Funding Expenditures: Listed in Table 1: Maximum Funding Expenditures per Bus. 3 Table 1: Maximum Funding Expenditures per Bus New Bus Maximum Funding Level Battery Electric Transit bus $180,000 Fuel Cell Transit bus $400,000 Electric School bus (replacing a compliant old bus) $400,000 Electric School bus (replacing a non -compliant old bus) $380,000 Electric Shuttle bus $160,000 F. Project Expenditure Limitations 1. Entity Funding Limitation: The maximum funding expenditures per Entity, as determined by Tax Identification Number, is $3,250,000. a. If insufficient applications are received to expend trust funds, SJVAPCD reserves the right to issue additional contracts beyond the above stated limit. Table 2: Maximum -Funding Expenditures per Entity, per Installment Entity Maximum Funding Level Determined by Tax ID $3,250,000 2. Category Funding Limitation: Of the three bus categories — transit, school bus, and shuttle — funding for a single bus category must not exceed 50 percent of the available VW Mitigation Trust Funds, including earned interest, in each installment. 3. Equipment Options: While not specifying any particular ineligible equipment options, SJVAPCD reserves the right to deny reimbursement for non-standard accessories and equipment considered excessive peripheral costs. The applicant may still choose to purchase these options, however, they are not eligible for reimbursement nor will they be used in the calculation of the limitations of funding amounts specified below. 4. Bus Funding Limitation: Funding amounts for buses must not exceed actual project costs. 5. Non -government owned limitation: Funding amounts for non -government owned transit, school, and shuttle buses must not exceed 75 percent of project costs. 6. Non -Compliant School Bus: For school buses that are not compliant with the CARB Truck and Bus Regulation, the maximum funding amounts will be reduced by $20,000 to account for the cost of compliance through the purchase of a DPF. 7. Multiple Funds Limitation: Selected applicants may not receive more funds 12 than the eligible project costs, whether funded solely with the VW Mitigation Trust Funds or funded with multiple funding sources. 8. Leasing Limitations: Replacement bus owners can lease the buses purchased using VW Mitigation Trust Funds to third parties, provided the following requirements are met: a. Lease agreement must be a minimum of 36 months b. Lease agreements must contain program requirements, including, but not limited to: requirements of the new bus, contract requirements, record requirements, reporting requirements. Additional requirements can be found in Section Vehicle Leasing or Rental Agencies 9. Returned VW Mitigation Trust Funds: The SJVAPCD must spend returned trust funds on eligible projects, or return trust funds to the Trustee. 10. Unspent VW Mitigation Trust Funds: CARB Executive Officer or designee reserves the right in his or her sole discretion to award any remaining unspent trust funds to another Project Administrator or other mitigation projects. G. Match Funding (Co -Funding) Match funding from the applicant is encouraged and required for school bus purchases (at least 5 percent) and all non -government owned purchases (at least 25 percent). For school bus purchases, the cost of the required infrastructure for the new, replacement bus is used to meet the required 5 percent match. Match funding may include funding from other State, local, federal, non-profit, or private revenue sources. Match funding may not include funding where any portion of the resulting NOx reductions could be double -counted, including but not limited to Hybrid and Zero -Emission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP), Carl Moyer Program, AB923, and AB617. The applicant must report all match funding amounts and sources to SJVAPCD prior to contract and again during the reimbursement process. H. Payment for Scrap The selected applicant must scrap the old bus within 60 days of the receipt of the new bus by rendering the old bus permanently and irreversibly incapable of functioning as originally intended Income for scrap is not allowed. SJVAPCD will allow a selected applicant to receive payment for scrap under the following conditions a. The selected applicant provides to the SJVAPCD the receipt for any scrap payment showing the amount of funds received from the dismantler. b. SJVAPCD will reduce the VW Mitigation Trust Funds award by the scrap payment amount if the scrap amount, plus VW Mitigation Trust Funds 5 amount, plus match exceeds the new bus purchase price. c. SJVAPCD and the selected applicant will retain documentation of any scrap payment as part of the project record. Table 3: Processing Flow Chart solicitation pplication submitted through online portal Application is date stamped with the time submitted Application Application determined to be determined to be Eligible ineligible Entity fund cap Offered Contract Cancelled met Applicant is Project comple waitlistedte Contract sent Applicant has to report for 3 years L. Vehicle Purchasers 1. Responsibilities for Vehicle Purchasers: The bus purchaser is responsible for completing an application, executing a contract with SJVAPCD, complying with A the terms of the contract, and obtaining funding for or paying the match portion of the vehicle cost. 2. Requirements for Vehicle Purchasers: The bus purchaser must be an individual, business, non-profit, or government entity that is based in California or has a California -based affiliate. A bus leasing/rental agency based outside of California is also eligible if the vehicle is leased/rented to an entity that will meet all operational, reporting, and other applicable requirements. 3. Restriction for Vehicle manufacturers and Dealers: Vehicle manufacturers and dealers may apply for no more than two vehicles in each installment. This applies to vehicles the manufacturer produces and for vehicles the dealer makes available for sale. Vehicle manufacturers and dealers will be required to provide SJVAPCD and CARB additional information including, but not limited to, manufacturing costs and dealer invoice or acquisition costs. If a vehicle manufacturer or dealer chooses to purchase a vehicle they do not produce or sell, then this condition will not apply. 4. Insurance Requirement: Maintain insurance as required by law. If an accident or other cause destroys or otherwise renders permanently inoperable the purchased vehicle, the bus purchaser must notify SJVAPCD within one week of the occurrence. The written notification must provide proof that the funded vehicle has become inoperable, including photographs of the inoperable vehicle with license plates or other identifying markings, as well as any applicable insurance or police documentation. 5. Expectation to Operate: SJVAPCD expects the vehicle to operate primarily in California for three years after purchase. 6. Prohibition to Modify Vehicle: Not make or allow any modifications to the vehicle's emissions control systems, hardware, or software calibrations, (Vehicle Code Section 27156), and not install any combustion source such as a fuel fired heater. 7. Reporting Requirement: Submit annual activity reports for three years. SJVAPCD requires the funded vehicle owner to complete activity reports. SJVAPCD and CARB reserve the right to bar a fleet that does not provide timely and accurate usage surveys/questionnaires as required from future project participation. 8. Access to DMV Records: Allow CARB, SJVAPCD, or their designees to verify the bus registration with the DMV for three years after initial registration. 9. Inspection Availability: Be available for follow-up inspection if requested by the SJVAPCD, CARB, or designees. 10. Penalty for Falsifying Information: The bus purchaser is responsible for ensuring the accuracy of the vehicle and purchaser information on the application forms. SJVAPCD and CARB may consider submission of false information on these forms a criminal offense, punishable under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California. 7 11. Requirement to Maintain Records: Bus purchasers must keep written records of the bus purchase for buses funded with mitigation trust funds — including the vehicle invoice, proof of purchase, and DMV records — for the contract term plus three years. 12. Requirement to Provide Records: A bus purchaser must provide SJVAPCD, CARB, or its designees with all requested information related to any bus purchased with mitigation trust funds within ten days of a written request for such information. Requested information may include but is not limited to purchase orders or agreements, vehicle payment information and related bank records, and purchaser fleet information. SJVAPCD and CARB may require selected applicants that submit false information to return the full mitigation trust fund amount and may exclude them from future project participation. In addition, SJVAPCD and CARB may pursue other remedies available under the law. M. Resale of Vehicles 1. Notification of Intent to Resell: The original vehicle purchaser must notify SJVAPCD in writing of its intent to sell the vehicle at least seven calendar days prior to the vehicle resale. 2. CARB Approval: CARB and SJVAPCD expects selected applicants to keep the vehicle and meet all applicable project requirements for a minimum three-year period after the vehicle purchase date. However, unforeseen or unavoidable circumstances may allow for the resale of a vehicle within this three-year period. Resale of a funded vehicle must receive SJVAPCD and CARB written approval prior to resale. 3. Prohibition To Resell More Than Once in Three -Year Project Life: A funded vehicle may not be resold more than once within three years of the original purchase date. 4. Contract Amendment (Novation): For vehicles resold within three years of the original vehicle purchase date (and after SJVAPCD and CARB provides written approval), the original vehicle purchaser must inform the new purchaser in writing about the project requirements — by sharing a copy of the project contract. The new vehicle purchaser must agree in writing to meet all applicable requirements of original vehicle purchasers — by signing an amended version of the project contract with SJVAPCD. 5. Notification of Resell: Within seven calendar days after the vehicle resale, the original vehicle or purchaser must notify SJVAPCD that the vehicle has been resold and provide the mailing address, phone number and email (if any) of the purchaser as well as the vehicle resale price. 6. Information Required from Second Owner During Three -Year Project Life: Within thirty calendar days after the vehicle resale, the entity buying the vehicle from the original vehicle purchaser must also provide SJVAPCD with: a. Mailing address n. b. Phone number and email (if any) c. A copy of the new DMV title documenting the vehicle resale d. A written commitment to meet the project requirements e. A written commitment to complete and return the annual usage survey/questionnaire as required by the project contract. 7. Prorated Funds for Resell or Moving Out -of -State: For funded vehicles resold or moved out of the State, the vehicle purchaser must refund promptly to SJVAPCD a prorated portion of their mitigation trust funds received, in an amount equivalent to the original amount divided by 36 months and then multiplied by the number of months remaining in the original 60 month period (rounded to the nearest month): (Original Voucher Amount = 36 Months) x (36 — months since vehicle purchase date). 8. Pursuit of Remedies for Noncompliance: SJVAPCD and CARB reserve the right to pursue all remedies available under the law for noncompliance with these requirements. N. Vehicle Leasing or Rental Agencies Any vehicle lease or rental entity that leases or rents a vehicle purchased with VW Mitigation Trust Funds maintains responsibility for all recordkeeping and reporting requirements, and must disclose the recordkeeping and reporting requirements to the vehicle renter or lessee. The lease or rental agreement must include all commitments needed from the lessee or renter to ensure that: 1. The vehicle operates primarily in California as required by the contract with SJVAPCD; and 2. The lease must ensure that all required annual activity reports are submitted to SJVAPCD. SJVAPCD, CARB or its designees reserve the right to review lease or rental agreements to confirm appropriate disclosures are made regarding VW Mitigation Trust Funds received and vehicle activity and reporting requirements. Selected applicants must provide SJVAPCD, CARB, or its designee all requested information related to any vehicle purchased with VW Mitigation Trust Funds (including lease or rental agreements) within ten days of SJVAPCD or CARB's written request for such information. The selected applicant (i.e. the lessor for lease agreements) is responsible for ensuring annual activity reports are accurate and are submitted as required. SJVAPCD provides a contract at time of vehicle purchase only, and not at the time a vehicle is leased or rented. III. Project Non -Performance SJVAPCD, CARB or its designee has the authority to recoup VW Mitigation Trust Funds received based upon misinformation or fraud, or for which SJVAPCD or its subcontractors, a dealership, manufacturer, or vehicle purchaser is in significant or 9 continual non-compliance with this Implementation Manual or State law. SJVAPCD and CARB also retains the authority to prohibit any entity from participating in other incentive programs due to non-compliance with project requirements. 10 Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Specifications and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW 19-08 PREPARED BY: Avlin Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer Shawna Bennetts, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road; and 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. BACKGROUND: As part of the Capital Improvements Program and Budget for Fiscal Years 2021-25, the City Council approved appropriations to support a Citywide Pavement Rehabilitation Program that would implement the recommended maintenance activities identified in the Pavement Management Program update (PMP). The PMP prioritized the areas in need of repairs and identified the recommended method for these repairs. Using the PMP, staff selected Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road based on its ranking in the PMP report, economy of scale, and the available budget. The project will rehabilitate the full width of Pauba Road from Margarita Road (excluding the intersection) to Butterfield Stage Road, and the full width of Butterfield Stage Road from 405 feet south of De Portola Road to 230 feet south of Rancho California Road. Work generally will consist of cold milling 2 to 3-inches of the existing pavement, placing asphalt concrete, reconstructing ADA ramps, adjusting utilities to grade, replacing striping, and providing new protected bike lines, pavement markers, and traffic signal loops. Project Specifications are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the office of the Director of Public Works. The Engineer's Construction Cost Estimate is approximately $3,600,000.00 and the number of allowable working days is 144, which is seven months. This Project is exempt from CEQA requirements pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15301 states that the repair and maintenance of existing highways, streets, and gutters are Class 1 activities, which are exempt from CEQA. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Citywide is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program, Fiscal Years 2021-25, and is funded with General Fund, Gas Tax, Measure A, Measure S, Reimbursements and funding from the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account (RMRA), which is part of the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program created with the passage of SB1. Costs for portions of work on this project will be reimbursed by various utility companies and Riverside County which have jurisdiction over existing facilities within the project limits. Adequate funds are available in the project accounts to construct the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Description 2. Project Location Map Alk 1,c•rn C a :1�rni.- ir: Co.:,iIF, City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROGRAM - CITYWIDE Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the environmental processing, design, construction of pavement rehabilitation, and reconstruction of major streets as recommended in the Pavement Management Program update. Benefit: This project improves pavement conditions so that the transportation needs of the public, business industry, and government can be met. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects from the Pavement Management Program is used to determine the projects to be undertaken. Construction is completed annually based on the allocated funds. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.655 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2019-20 Adjusted 2020-21 Proposed Budget 2021-22 Projected 2022-23 Projected 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 2,574,251 1,601,669 531,089 659,259 668,205 662,724 682,098 7,379,295 Construction 20,054,090 8,612,926 1,529,526 1,366,410 1,373,475 1,404,571 1,398,633 35,739,631 Construction Engineering 327,929 1,038,070 528,539 378,934 383,203 377,723 385,277 3,419,675 Design & Environmental 789,099 508,943 1,298,042 Total Expenditures 23,745,369 11,761,608 2,589,154 2,404,603 2,424,883 2,445,018 2,466,008 47,836,643 Source of Funds: Gas Tax 1,200,000 1,200,000 General Fund 5,692,614 5,692,614 Measure A 16,646,857 5,701,509 470,675 540,714 523,716 505,828 488,034 24,877,333 Measure 5 2,000,000 2,000,000 Reimbursements 36,000 36,000 RMRA 1,251,263 2,978,734 2,118,479 1,863,889 1,901,167 1,939,190 1,977,974 14,030,696 Total Funding 26,826,734 8,680,243 2,589,154 2,404,603 2,424,883 2,445,018 2,466,008 47,836,643 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. (1) Road Repair and Accountability Act (RMRA) 85 '• *M1 '�44RR'' Mid a O ^•'"^✓. c R.yµ, •'Jrr_,.t�1 "•` - r .�....--_ � �R- 1Nf f�� •� � �� 'E, �' �?Q v.61°_= i i_ r: v ew f�F�y35j ` 1 '� �'c { My • s `�9��' ti. MUM Legend ���R�EE Cie' r alb O� a c�(" � t�i N' ! 0•'.y!, vim•- 7• 'M➢lkylk?i,� � G� `C'�y' . ;1� � T �, � w,�,��'.. ,� r�.�;+�•�dF. � .+� � ;�y, 6 s- g.f". /` F p•:. Z _-''r ply §F,..�". • ► t �.�:. ^ C9 w r. y y U' W•� - r• _ s y� i �. ,•s,LN.ii ''.rs:'4 r �' �.�! ''. y� � � �•;r• �tvr'' ' �1 � N �� j�....��:r' «yy'�pGP '���: . ��"a:• +�^� '�''FcSai • `•! ° .!'' r. l:� `Y, �. .+ ..4��°rM'':�[+a � � l�y.'"A''+ � �Ie .`''-'�9r}� t y��'L�'•.�: ' 1 �� _ �„ q 1. �w�a: ��' � »•: w..k r,'���� ,�,�4' '� �.� '' .'�. r� roc ����}, O �;' �.fr .� j. • p2 ,�r :Yr Nr.. �y.,Y .• ',�� :. "y ��� -''�-� 'lr �' ,� �} <'' g��'�' iw.���,; `Pf�*a ,�� e+.' �,�+,�PFsF,P'i• � F' _p� : i�y�; V�►PraRN �. bG' ICI �w �'d '�i > `R+r�' � µ � _ •� ��EO ''�` -�. •i� - . �i :;' ,� � � . '1�.� 't1•�?,. iQ ,{. x � " 5 Q � • TVA }i - 'y. ,� jpN�S - y+ , '1' ''X = •� [ •V' •:�17j'. l'_ . � ..' ! •�J'.ti . GORT,E+F��RE6\ "` : yR iRp ��. r � ..' �`��SP ,• �w�,��`� �-'� Ni$r�3ye�§il3�t��` G Ma��i � . x f r , 6�4 �• � ''i'O� �� %� �� � ° � � � � +� ^'�'C�•j O$NUNEZ �,tEZP ) •��� L :}� �?5r. �� ,�� #; �ti�.� Rid` �•?iq��r �� �• �O z .. r�+`;a+ T ; °g., .,\P;• 0. COR:TE'CARMELq \ Ep 1, eq_4 •(DEL .p�C .\t��` p`��5' - �i'P+i -v—da ° a5-�,` p � �9 � E, R E � I'�'• �ppp,,,,,�' �Q� �. p,... � 'O�RY �` �rs'. ,o iu, �''gg__ �1 f � p G y }ly 31'F '� ,�.:' N R.. > ?g�: yo ,��L•a�AVy. � �' ° }� "�"e�,r���e .i:,, tp 4pjY' yy0: 7N j y ,�'�$Q' k ''' ar rti4. •'gyp ,.�� 1p ^11' '•,y\�111�1 D'L'N����"= 0� d N qq ! 0�� `.T�r C _• JJ `9�J"�Y ati - N :• 5 ��Ypl" CREST PLC ;';,ir ' ^s2 r N V . �P r t r R �-� �, �- � Y � `• pr� �T ! r*• .'1' -.0 . `4 7�p.•/,'':: �::.._. T �"� N. � �= .�.r,'i�. r 1 ` � rt y c .y, ,t •y.-._ ' c3J fr1'pR '9' �0ii' mow:• 4: JI`i�F�'� �`-;r. m :•�� �v IN— N �,- !e.� �4. +}' rF '' � G� • � N ark+ `�a� �,..�I$Sk�� ;. oj•;ti. �ssr.a��,App?s'.' K ., '�#}iE,ly c{� A 'ti1�'rY. +'i�'w•%' . a � V �' � r'�f�d �'�j. P,ao� ,,.,,' GPI. �S�r ' ,.yham •, r• ��� + 0�7 ,I � s ;'�i :'�„`�'ii�■�: .0 � � �9X�� ' � �•�r?�', � ��-,�m`�,�� :�o,.�' �• y,.r '^ 2• , „�:� �-?' ,y • 7 Jap'7� pf} �,y •ate + . Rp VI- •P o ��ig4 pit . �� j g ?bD�_� •� � I �� �'.. �. � n� }: . rvF �?, y ` -u�. 'Lp� . .'t� ,•'Fyp +9�i..� �����•,�, �,.�A. �ti�3 I �i {�. ., i � �•R ;' ,a PA A ,��� � .� 16 . �`�•'r'• '� re• :�+, ` J �,,,- __ .Zw"�r�iR t: �0���• ,�•,a ,`,. :o'S';'a„ e, q�1P��- .pa`.• 4 ��EN'.1 a • C.c' z y'Sa ^�.g p' •' yr.Q ,�"�`: t"' t' '.a :D. C9 - v .%'�.-�^:^ �.'i pt �� A , ' aaiFC' 41 w• a.�N 4LLERSA �I a of o �'" . .•.:.. ".4h Q'.. � ' �°� � O 'NOC n'' O,���il y;ix y9� �a1Y y p o S� �r' • G° r '^y�a�9>IK•r vim• . +"% ems. P.! (�' = VIA':BANDE G N'N•s` . •sa0 .GROWN , • iY .,L q' ��,�W •t a'�sQ►Ap�`'+.� 'o' sP . �� 5i ak�� °9�. !. peP�y?" r A.`i� f sN ` ! " Oda ^��- iM Q� i4'�(��•. 7• 2 �, ~O S aj y i�o:. �>'71•.z,;"{�P,O _SAN 1 yv fi• fi• m aa1�O J. 4t Y" ''' i. " �f�� s��P 'yIIp... .: mTr+`�. O :3Lr -c. - :*CT °'.3'• " a BIE:ST ( !x' 9 �r V 9¢• z• y� I. �g�1'� ,,,r 6r� ,� ►l�rEt �a241 Yr•�' ,a � 4e '�, 'r r^r�Y'- all.w �� ' 3� i�r�G�`Y,.� ��95 ,��qL• ` .J���'"�� ` A +� � I �� � .y,fl � RAP,•. - �' . •� .lk+� . •� `�,g�t�R �� .. � �S A�j�P," `q✓�0.1 + r_ ®p^ 96:6F ° aAI C046A' d�q'ba�91�,�' �. ^V 4; � � ' A �i��Np+� � �! �� °RSE AL�6E(' 1 �� 1 9'E'A .`EENA Wqy' Gq� • RGq�O, .. '4` ; a ^ ����� � �'�.�� ��.y� , �':'�'� . �i�3�►i i 1 qT . C.T � VAL- E T �- pR O �� r fradr ty� Ilti Il�l� � �C � �/.y f `+l���A�►. CLw� G\aP � � Y z �. C' :; : f• ��++��',, •'�� , � "''r A%:i� •r: � � c� .'� fq.S p _ ti per,. * �'� � :�., ''Ne , ' 7�k. � .i, ,p,.,•t '"'mod � `. � . ���. , i .Np.iCAL1ARl - : � � .� .. ..9�1F�� -- i 4: - �S��gi��ejr�'+AN�E� '-� '- �v �2 :t. 4i :_O. '°..:•..'�:� awl .. �1.R l� _ ...k WcYr, .:rap; I,.; _ - SPP - ,r#d� 1 _ +fir O O T Tq:N]+�il A y C�Q�y +S►i,' E• `� Ir N A' cri'� n l_ !''�. ��I AN°�•� y o '��?L; � 1 Pq �,. >;� � R �hff jr ���p' O �gP.GO• V1A BE' •. r A - A � ._ •Qrdx".. 1„• PR� , 9�., �'^�:-oeMit+�.. P'I-P' OfS�.Y 4f''� '1 iti �• Z!r V r<^Q� din :::CCC]]]-S•A�pT.�i ° it �'�,�. �I ,- _1 evf:39d4'l�i�r•� �O�S�E\-�"- -VP •�f` .�� x��. �n �,�,ir�':P"l�`.�-'�'n'�y:..�-.. �Il�gl,. �a�"�..r����'..`"'.-, ,4:. • 1's�a• - .t 'P �PNtx f�: � �il�'=�y �! L�1p\FORA - -. :, - •.r ,r,�°j ,,�. �,t;�y�rMfW�R. GP�4+• �°,�,rGP' �-�CX�°1 y 1 Project g. n - ,. •, .�y City Boundary Wk=O �•' S1T1'1' `�� , � •CyA� i� L}��e • 1���¢i�i!•�*C' �S:1�e�: ��i E3'��Yai"_/L }.p' "L•' .;eiT i. ' E Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Minor Maintenance Agreements for Landscape Maintenance Services with MCE Corporation and Nieves Landscape, Inc. PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve a Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services of Sports Parks and School Sites with MCE Corporation, in the amount of $910,838.40 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. 2. Approve a Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape Maintenance Services of Facilities, Medians, Parks, Trails, and Slopes with Nieves Landscape, Inc., in the amount of $1,757,796.00 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. BACKGROUND: On December 10, 2020, the Public Works Department Maintenance Division posted on the City of Temecula' s online bidding service, Planet Bids, a Request for Proposal (RFP) No. 248 for Landscape Maintenance Services. The Public Works Department received six (6) electronic proposals. Selected panel members reviewed each proponent's submittals and collectively determined that MCE Corporation and Nieves Landscape, Inc., to be the most qualified and competitively priced vendors to provide landscape maintenance services. Staff is recommending the approval of agreements for landscape maintenance services through FY 2021-2022. Each agreement also includes a provision for a CPI adjustment each fiscal year, and upon mutual agreement between the City and Contractor, an allowance to extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year terms, and in no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds will be available in the Annual Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2021-2022. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement — MCE Corporation 2. Agreement — Nieves Landscape, Inc. AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MCE CORPORATION LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE — SPORTS PARKS & SCHOOL SITES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 27, 2021, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MCE Corporation, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2021, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2022, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year term(s). In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2026. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each fiscal year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Core Based Statistical Area using the most recently published month annual percentage change not to exceed 3% of the previous fiscal year's total agreement amount. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A and as outlined in RFP No. 248 Scope of Service, General and Special Specifications. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Nine Hundred Ten Thousand, Eight Hundred Thirty -Eight dollars and Forty cents ($910,838.40) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees, it shall give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed 06/11 /2020 shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. Contractor shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Contractor shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.cagov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.htmi 06/11 /2020 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 06111 /2020 1) Insurance Services Office_ Commercial General Liability Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two Million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 06/11/2020 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self- insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION 06/11/2020 No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Agreement, Contractor shall file an affidavit with the City Manager stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 20. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 22. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 23. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt 06/11/2020 showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: MCE Corporation Attn: Steve Loweree PO Box 508 Concord, CA 94522 24. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 25. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. O6/11/2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: MCE CORPORATION (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) Jeff Core, President and CEO By: /6�n= Steve Lowelfee, Vice President and Secretary By: _ Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR _MCE Corporation Attn: Steve Loweree PO Box 508 Concord, CA 94522 Ph: 925-452-2709 SLoweree MCE-CORP.COM City Purchasing Mgr. Init nd pate: � O6/11/2020 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Contractor recognizes and agrees that this Agreement is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship between the City of Temecula and the Contractor, for landscape maintenance at the various locations upon real and personal property of the City. Work will include maintenance services, and emergency call -out. The procedure for assigning work is set forth as follows: 1. The City Manager or his designee shall submit to Contractor a written "Request for Work". The Request for Work shall include a description of the work to be completed, the time for completion of the work, and the plans and specifications, if any, work. 2. Within five (5) business days of the date of the Request for Work, Contractor shall respond in writing to the Request for Work and advise the City Manager whether it can perform the work and specify the cost of material which will be required and the estimated cost of labor and equipment necessary to complete the work in accordance with the labor and equipment rates set forth in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement. 3. In the event emergency work is required, the City Manager may transmit the Request for Work orally to the Contractor. As soon as practical following the emergency, the Contractor and Director shall in good faith confirm in writing the scope of the emergency work undertaken. 4. Upon acceptance of the Contractor's response by the City Manager, the Contractor shall proceed with the work. The performance of the work shall be pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals as required by the Agreement for the above -stated services. The general items to include: General Landscape Maintenance Services, including labor, material, supplies and equipment as needed for maintenance of landscape area, plant material and irrigation equipment. Services to be performed in accordance with the City of Temecula General Landscape Maintenance Specifications (Specifications), and as outlined in RFP No. 248 Scope of Service, General and Special Specifications which establish the scope, service level and frequency under which the Contractor will provide Landscape Maintenance Service (Service) at the designated sites. Any extra work determined to be required under the scope of services of the agreement shall be awarded at the agreement price. City reserves the right to reduce scope of landscape maintenance services and adjust monthly service fees accordingly at any time over the course of the agreement term. [III.11SY 011411 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Landscape Maintenance Service Area Fee Schedule SPORTS PARKSISCHOOL SITES Site No. Site Name Monthly Fee FY21122 Annual Cast FY21t22 SP-01 Ronald Reagan Sports Park $ 14,787.59 $ 177,451.08 SP-02 Paloma Del Sol Park $ 5,501.91 $ 66.022.92 SP-03 Pala Community Park $ 3,176.48 $ 38,117.76 SP-04 Kent Hintergardt Park $ 5,454.62 $ 65,457.84 SP-05 Margarita Community Park $ 5,385.61 $ 64,627.32 OOP-06 Temeku Hills Park $ 5,666.82 $ 68,001,84 SP-07 Harveston Community Park $ 8,814.95 $ 105,779,40 SP-08 Patricia H. Birdsall Sports Park S 13,334.46 $ 160,013.52 SP-09 IRoripaugh Ranch Sports Park' $ 8,470.01 $ 101,640.12 SC-01 Temecula Middle School - baseball fields $ 423.98 $ 5,087.76 SC-02 'Temecula Elementary School - baseball fields $ 435.78 $ 5,229.36 SC-03 James L Day Middle School - baseball fields $ 359.77 $ 4,317.24 SC-04 Temecula Valley High Schaal - tennis courts $ 424.67 $ 5,096.04 SC-06 'Mail Ranch Middle School - baseball Cieldsdbasketlaall courts $ 588.89 $ 7,066.68 SC-09 Great Oak High School -tennis courts $ 338.73 $ 4,064.76 SC 10 Erle Stanley Gardner Middle School - tennis courts $ 338.73 $ 4,064.76 F-01 lCommunity Recreation Center $ 2,400.00 $ 28,800-00 TOTAL: 3 73,503.20 1 $ 910,838.40 • Roripaugh Ranch Sports Park- currently in development and is anticipated to be active park in Fy21/22 10 06/11/2020 AGREEMENT FOR MINOR MAINTENANCE SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE FACILITIES, MEDIANS, PARKS, TRAILS, & SLOPES THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 27, 2021, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Nieves Landscape, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on July 1, 2021, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2022, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for four (4) additional one (1) year term(s). In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2026. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each fiscal year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Core Based Statistical Area using the most recently published month annual percentage change not to exceed 3% of the previous fiscal year's total agreement amount. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work"), and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A and as outlined in RFP No. 248 Scope of Service, General and Special Specifications. 3. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Million, Seven Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand, Seven Hundred Ninety -Six Dollars ($1,757,796.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. C. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt 06/11 /2020 give written notice to Contractor within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Contractor shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 4. PERFORMANCE Contractor shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Contractor shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 5. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 3 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this Agreement. The acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against City under or arising out of this Agreement, except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify Agreement with each claim for payment. 7. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Agreement from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http:Jlwww.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 8. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http:llwww.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html O6111/2020 9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 11. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 12. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 06111 /2020 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability Form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Contractor owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Contractor has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Contractor shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: Two Million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Contractor shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A. M. Best rating of A -:VI I or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self-insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. f. Verification of Covera e. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City 's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. By executing this Agreement, Contractor hereby certifies: I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. 13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this Agreement. 14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 06/11/2020 16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Agreement, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by City for purposes of letting this Agreement out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Agreement. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the Work contemplated by this Agreement, Contractor shall file an affidavit with the City Manager stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 18. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 19. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Agreement, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 20. UTILITY LOCATION City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 22. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 06/11/2020 23. WRITTEN NOTICE Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Contractor: Nieves Landscape, Inc. Attn: Walter Sato 1629 E. Endinger Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92705] 24. ASSIGNMENT The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Contractor's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Contractor. 26. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor O6/11/2020 and has -the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 06/11/2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA NIEVES LANDSCAPE, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Rand! Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: By: -/';� Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR Nieves Landscape, Inc. Attn: Walter Sato 1629 E. Endinger Ave. Santa Ana, CA 92705 Ph. (7114) 334-1677 WSato@nieveslandscape.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initl nc(D Its 06i1 v2020 EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Contractor recognizes and agrees that this Agreement is for the purpose of establishing a contractual relationship between the City of Temecula and the Contractor, for landscape maintenance at the various locations upon real and personal property of the City. Work will include maintenance services, and emergency call -out. The procedure for assigning work is set forth as follows: 1. The City Manager or his designee shall submit to Contractor a written "Request for Work". The Request for Work shall include a description of the work to be completed, the time for completion of the work, and the plans and specifications, if any, work. 2. Within five (5) business days of the date of the Request for Work, Contractor shall respond in writing to the Request for Work and advise the City Manager whether it can perform the work and specify the cost of material which will be required and the estimated cost of labor and equipment necessary to complete the work in accordance with the labor and equipment rates set forth in Exhibit "B" to this Agreement. 3. In the event emergency work is required, the City Manager may transmit the Request for Work orally to the Contractor. As soon as practical following the emergency, the Contractor and Director shall in good faith confirm in writing the scope of the emergency work undertaken. 4. Upon acceptance of the Contractor's response by the City Manager, the Contractor shall proceed with the work. The performance of the work shall be pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. The work to be done consists of furnishing all materials, equipment, tools, labor and incidentals as required by the Agreement for the above -stated services. The general items to include: General Landscape Maintenance Services, including labor, material, supplies and equipment as needed for maintenance of landscape area, plant material and irrigation equipment. Services to be performed in accordance with the City of Temecula General Landscape Maintenance Specifications (Specifications), and as outlined in RFP No. 248 Scope of Service, General and Special Specifications which establish the scope, service level and frequency under which the Contractor will provide Landscape Maintenance Service (Service) at the designated sites. Any extra work determined to be required under the scope of services of the agreement shall be awarded at the agreement price. City reserves the right to reduce scope of landscape maintenance services and adjust monthly service fees accordingly at any time over the course of the agreement term. 10 06/11/2020 EXHIBIT "B" PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE Landscape Maintenance Service Area Fee Schedule FACILITIES Site No. Site Name Monthly Fee FY21122 Annual Cost FY21122 F-02 Mary Phillips Senior Center $ 700.00 $ 8,400.00 F-03A Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2) $ 1 000.00 $ 12,000.00 F-03C Field Operations Center (FOC) $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00 F-04 Temecula Community Center $ 450.00 $ 5,400.00 F-05 Fire Station #84 $ 650.00 $ 7,800,00 F-06 Old Town Temecula $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000.00 F-10 Temecula Children's Museum $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00 F-12 Temecula Community Theater $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00 F-13 Temecula Public Library $ 1,100.00 $ 13,200.00 F-15 Wolf Creek Fire Station #92 $ 450.00 $ 5,400.00 F-16 Fire Station #73 $ 200.00 $ 2,400.00 F-17A Civic CenterfTown Square $ 1,000.00 $ 12,006-00 F-17B Parking Garage $ 200.00 $ 2,400-00 F-19 Roripaugh Fire Station #95 $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 F-20 Overland Training Center $ - 150.00 $ 1,800.00 F-21 Margarita Recreation Center $ 200.00 $ 2,400.00 F-30 Jefferson Recreation Center $ 100-001 $ 1,200.00 TOTAL: $ 10,150.00 S 121,800.00 06/11/2020 MEDIANS Site No. Site Nance Monthly Fee FY21122 Annual Cost FY21122 M-01 Rancho California Road Pvtedians $ 1,000.00 $ 12,000.00 M-02 Ynez Road Medians $ 1,000.00 $ 12,000.00 M-03 Butterfield Stage Road Medians $ 1,400.00 $ 16,800.00 M-03 Butterfield Stage Road Medians (North)' $ 1,600-00 $ 19,200.00 M-04 Margarita Road Medians (North) $ 750.00 $ 9,000.00 M-05 Margarita Road Medians (South) $ 150-00 $ 1,800.00 M-06 Winchester Road at Jefferson Median $ 2,700.00 $ 32,400.00 M-07 Pechanga Parkway Medians $ 1,600.00 $ 19,200.00 M-08 Meadows Parkway Medians (North) $ 750.00 $ 9,000,00 M-09 Paseo Del Sol Medians $ 750-00 $ 9,000.00 M-10 Harveston Medians (Date StreetfMargadta Road) $ 2,500-00 $ 30,000.00 M-11 Jefferson Avenue Medians $ 150-00 $ 1,800.00 M-13 Redhawk Medians $ 1,000.00 $ 12,000.00 M-14 Temecula Parkway Medians $ 2,000.00 $ 24,000.00 M-15 'Wolf Valley Road Medians $ 80-00 $ 960.00 M-16 Diaz Rd Medians f Parkway $ 600-00 $ 7,200.00 M-17 Meadows Parkway Medians (South) $ 700-00 $ 8,400.00 M-18 Murrieta Hot Springs Road Medians $ 500.00 $ 6,000.00 M-19 De PWola Rd Medians at Temecula Valley Hospital $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00 FW-01 Interstate 15 OrVOff Ramps (Alinchester Road, Rancho California Road, Temecula Parkway Interchange) $ 2,500-00 $ 30,000.00 TOTAL: $ 21,830.00 $ 261,960.00 ' Butterfield Stage Road Medians (North) - currently in development and due to be active in FY20121 IPA 06/11 /2020 Passive Parks, Streetseapes & Traits Site No. Site Name UGnthly Fee FY21122 Annual Cost FY2t122 P-01 Veterans Park S 1.9001M b 22,8DD.DD P-02 Sam Hrks Monument Park ffi 1.600.00 b 19,20D.00 P-03 Calle Aragon Park S 300.00 b 3.800.00 P-04 Bahia Vista Park S 300.00 b 3,600.00 P-415 LDma Linda Park S 1,250.00 b 15,000.00 P-06 RNe tc, Park ffi 2.000.00 $ 24,000.00 P-07 Join Magee Park S 550.00 b 6,6DO.D0 P-09 Voor-,urg Park S 400.00 ffi 4,800.013 P-10 Niealas Road Park S 1.200.00 b 14,400.00 P-11 Butterf-eld "stage Park S 1,200.00 $ 14,40D.00 P-12 Terr*cula Glick Pored Park ffi 2,500.00 b 30,000-00 P-13 Rotary Park S 350.00 b 4,200.01) P-14 Nakayama Park S 350.D0 b 4,200.00 P-15 Winchester Creek Park S 1.600.00 b 19,200.00 P-16 Long Canyon Creek Park ffi 1.600.00 b 19,200.00 P-17 Vail Ranch Park S 6.700.00 b 80,400.00 P-19 Stephen Michael Lien Jr. Memorial Park ffi 800.00 $ 9,60D.DD P-12 Pablo Apis Park S 806.00 $ 9, MOOD P 20 Crowne H -4 Park S 1.500.00 ; 18,000.00 P-21 Meadows Park S 2.000,Ii0 b 24,000.00 P-22 Pautaa Ridge Park ffi 2.000.00 b 24,000.00 P-23 Serena H *s Park ffi 1.300.00 b 15,600.00 P-24 Ha-vzstor, Lake Park S 3.800.00 .b 45,600.00 P-25 Sunset Park S 650.00 b 7,80D.00 P-26 Paseo Gallante Park ffi 750.00 b 9.000.00 P-27 Temecula Creek Trail Park S 1.000.00 b 22.800.00 P-28 Redhawk Community Park S 6.200.00 .5 74.400.00 P-29 'Wolf Creek Trail Park S 3.000.00 b 36,000.00 P-30 Wolf Creek Park ffi 250.00 b 3,000-00 P-31 Skyview Park ffi 1,800.00 b 21.600.00 PR-01 Ternecula Park 8 Ride ffi 850.00 b 7.800.00 SS-01 IVia Eduardo Streetscape S 250.00 b 3,000.00 SS-03 Margarita Road Right -of -Way S 600.00 b 9.600.00 FC-01 Nada Lane S 20D.00 b 2,400.00 T-01 Santa Ge?ir-cisCreek Tra3 S 400.00 b 4,800-00 T-02 Temecula Creek Village Trail $ 200-00 b 2,400.00 T-D3 ML4rieta Creek M ti-Purpose Trail S 1,100.00 b 13,200.00 T-04 Murrieta Creek Trail - Phase 2' S 1.800.001 $ 21,800.00 TOTAL: $ 55,950-001 $ 671,400.00 ' Butterfield Stale Road Mediana North - currently in deaeto ment and due to he active in FY24/ai 13 [dclffFIKIKe, SLOPES - Service Level C Site No. Site Flame Monthly Fee FY21/22 Annual Cost FY21122 5-01 Saddtewood (Pavilion Point) $ 2,100.01) S 25?00.00 5-02 Winchester Creek (I and II) $ 1,450.00 S 17,400,00 5-03 Rancho Highlands $ 1,650.00 $ 19,800.E 5-04 The Aneyards $ 291.67 $ 3,500_DD 5-05 Signet Series $ 1,500.00 3 18,000.00 5-06 Woodcrest Country $ 750.00 $ 9,000.00 S-07 Rvdgevim $ 500.00 $ 6,000_DO S-08 Village Grove $ 5,600.00 5 67,200_DO E-09 Rancho Solana $ 75.00 $ 900.00 Si 0 Martinique $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00 5-11 Meadowview $ 62.50 $ 750.00 5-12 `Antage Hills $ 3,500.00 $ 42,000.00 5-13 Presley Development (Veranda. Country Glen, Bridlevale) $ 1.150.00 S 13,800.00 5-14 Morrison Hanes (Mirada) $ 450.00 $ 5,400.01) 5-15 Barclay Estates $ 400.00 $ 4,800.00 5-16 Tradeninds $ 950.00 $ 11,400_DO 5-17 IMonte lrsta $ 70.83 $ 850_DO 5-18 Temeku Hills $ 3,800.00 $ 45,600-00 5-19 Chantemar (Campos Verde) $ 2,50D_00 $ 30,000.00 5-20 Crowne Hill $ 5,500.00 S 66,000_DO 5-21 Vail Ranch $ 9,453.00 $ 113,436.D0 5-22 Sutton Place $ 162.50 $ 1,950.D0 5-23 Pheasant Run $ 225.00 $ 2,700.00 5-24 Harveston $ 5,500.00 5 66,000.00 5-25 Serena Hills $ 1,750.00 $ 21,000.00 5-26 Gallery Traditions $ 62.50 $ 750.00 5-27 Avonclale $ 250.00 $ 3,000.00 5-28 Wolf Creek $ 8,500.00 S 102,000.00 5-29 Gallery Portrait $ 100.00 $ 1,200.00 TOTAL: S 68,653.00 $ 702,636.00 14 06/11 /2020 Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement with Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC for the Traffic Signal — Park and Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 PREPARED BY: Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer Laura Bragg, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement with Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC for the Traffic Signal — Park and Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Signal — Park and Ride Access Improvements Project, PW18-11, is a Capital Improvement Program Project that proposes the construction of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane and relocates the access of the existing Park and Ride facility from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. The new access road crosses property owned by Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC. On December 12, 2017, the City Council passed, approved, and adopted Resolution No. 17-83 to enter into a Reimbursement Agreement with Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC for the Traffic Signal — Park and Ride Access Improvements. On February 24, 2021, the City Manager, under the authorities delegated by the City Council of the City of Temecula in Resolution 2021-06, approved and adopted the Final Initial Study (IS)/Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project. The IS/MND contains a mitigation measure to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including sacred items, burial goods and all archaeological artifacts that are recovered as a result of project implementation to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Since Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC is the property owner, the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement adds the necessary language committing Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC to relinquish ownership of cultural resources. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to the City by approving the First Amendment to the Reimbursement Agreement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. First Amendment 2. Project Description 3. Project Map 17-252 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA VALLEY HOSPITALITY, LLC FOR TEMECULA PARKWAY/WABASH LANE TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS AND CERTAIN ONSITE IMPROVEMENTS This First Amendment to Reimbursement Agreement for Temecula Parkway/Wabash Lane Traffic Signal Improvements and Certain Onsite Improvements ("First Amendment") is entered into between the City of Temecula ("City") and Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC, a California limited liability company ("TVH"). The City and TVH are referred to below collectively as the "Parties". The First Amendment is effective on the date that it is fully executed by the Parties ("Effective Date"). The City and TVH may be referred to below collectively as the "Parties". 1. RECITALS. This First Amendment is made with respect to the following purposes and facts that the Parties acknowledge are true and correct: A. On December 14, 2017, the City and TVH entered into that certain Reimbursement Agreement for Temecula Parkway/Wabash Lane Traffic Signal Improvements and Certain Onsite Improvements ("Reimbursement Agreement"). B. Pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement, the Parties agreed to certain provisions in connection with the City's construction of traffic signal improvements at the intersection of Temecula Parkway and Wabash Lane described in Exhibit "A" to the Reimbursement Agreement ("Traffic Signal Improvements"). The Parties also agreed to the City's construction of onsite improvements described on Exhibit "B" to the Reimbursement Agreement ("Onsite Improvements") on that certain real property owned by TVH identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Number 922-190-033 ("TVH Property") that would provide access to the adjacent City -owned parcel located at 30100 Temecula Parkway in the City of Temecula, and identified as Riverside County Tax Assessor's Parcel Number 922-190-035 ("City Property"). The City has constructed the Temecula Park and Ride Project ("Park and Ride") on the City Property. Pursuant to the Reimbursement Agreement, the Parties also agreed to certain reimbursement provisions relating to the City's construction of the Traffic Signal Improvements and Onsite Improvements. C. In entering into the Reimbursement Agreement, the City and TVH studied the nature of the Traffic Signal Improvements and Onsite Improvements and the benefits that said improvements will have on the TVH Property and the City Property. The Parties agreed that the construction of said improvements will provide for full access to the TVH Property instead of limited right -in and right -out access and will result in time and cost savings in the future for TVH at the time of development of the TVH Property. Construction of said improvements will also benefit the City Property by providing vehicular access, and egress and ingress through the TVH Property to the adjacent City Property, D. The City plans to commence construction of the Traffic Signal Improvements and Onsite Improvements in connection with the Traffic Signal — Park and Ride Access Improvements Project ("Project") in the near future. In connection with the AB 52 1 1086-0111 \2436589v 1. doe consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians ("Pechanga Tribe"), the City included in the Plans and Specifications for the Project the Standard Mitigation requirements for treatment and protection of cultural and archeological resources, except for one mitigation measure that requires a commitment from the owner of the TVH Property. The City has discussed the required mitigation measures with TVH and TVH has agreed to amend the Reimbursement Agreement to incorporate in the Reimbursement Agreement the commitment required by the owner of the TVH Property. E. The Parties desire to amend the Reimbursement Agreement by amending Section 5 of the Reimbursement Agreement titled "TVH Obligations" to add a new subsection e. to confirm TVH's agreement to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources that are found in the Project area in connection with the construction of the Project. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions of this First Amendment, and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree to amend the Reimbursement Agreement, subject to the terms and conditions set forth below. 2. AMENDMENT TO SECTION 5 OF THE REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT. The City and TVH agree to amend Section 5 of the Reimbursement Agreement titled "TVH Obligations" to add a new subsection e. that reads as follows: 5. TVH Obligations. e. TVH agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the Project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. 3. NO OTHER CHANGES. Except for the changes specifically set forth in this First Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the Reimbursement Agreement will remain in full force and effect. [SIGNATURES ON NEXT PAGE] -2- 1 1086-01 1 1 \2436589v I .doc IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this First Amendment is executed on the date set forth below: Temecula Valley Hospitality, LLC A California limited liability company Dated: September 11, , 2020 City of Temecula, a municipal corporation Dated: Attest: Randi Johl, City Clerk Approved as to form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney 2020 By: Title: -.Managing Member Kitit Po nsurict. Maryann Edwards, Mayor -3- 1 1086-01 11\2436589v 1.doc Alk f The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program TRAFFIC SIGNAL - PARK & RIDE ACCESS IMPROVMENTS Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Benefit: This project improves traffic safety and circulation throughout the City. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: Design is underway and construction will follow in Fiscal Year 2020-21. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.605 / PW18-11 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2020-21 2019-20 Adopted 2021-22 2022-23 2023-24 2024-25 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost Administration 82 147,043 147,125 Construction 562,365 300,000 862,365 Construction Engineering 17,655 17,655 Design & Environmental 109,975 166,129 276,104 MSHCP 29,425 15,000 44,425 Total Expenditures 110,057 922,617 315,000 1,347,674 Source of Funds: Developer Contribution 175,000 175,000 General Fund 226,725 226,725 Measure S 50,505 80,444 315,000 445,949 Settlement Proceeds 500,000 500,000 Total Funding i 777,2301 255,444 315,000 1,347,674 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 89 / CO Traffic Signal Park and Ride Access lmprovements Circulation Project Location ,.� Ft %'V . _ •� r I G a •'i'� 6-6 16 J•'�_.i Eqpt � .,! � "' .1. �/ < • �> Y Ira �{ I% �'�Jt2 e _ ,♦ ��° !� <ky 4b 1hC `�_� ti '�:: wl� ♦fir"` � `ae, .v:'i �` _�+ _ --. „_ -z yam, y I e k Z y�� C f 3 r 0". I`r R+-• �i� x ' '' 4 �' � r # * C�.�. E •.� ♦ ems.._ ' �'iSMt e F w ♦ <! Legend CIPArea 0 200 400 Feet The map TraffcSignal_ParkandRide.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update I�i�l and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis 2018 Aerial Data 82 Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Fifth Amendment to License Agreement No. 96-110 Between City of Temecula and Temeka Advertising for Kiosk Directional Sign Program PREPARED BY: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council Approve the Fifth Amendment to License Agreement No. 96-110 with Temeka Advertising for Kiosk Directional Sign Program. BACKGROUND: On May 26, 1996, the City Council approved a License Agreement granting Temeka Advertising an exclusive License to locate kiosk directional signs within the public right-of-way. According to the original agreement, Temeka Advertising shall install, construct and maintain kiosk signs within the public right-of-way, work with the City on placement of the signs, market the sign program, own the sign structures and pay the City a portion of revenue derived from leasing of space on each kiosk sign. The License Agreement was amended twice on February 27, 2001 (First and Second Amendments), on December 16, 2003 (Third Amendment) and on June 13, 2006 (Fourth Amendment). The Fourth Amendment extended the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2012. The parties now wish to amend the Agreement to extend the term to June 30, 2022. All terms of the original Agreement and previous Amendments shall remain in place. The Fifth Amendment includes new Exhibit B, Payment Schedule. FISCAL IMPACT: The above -referenced agreement does not impose any cost or expenses on the City and results in approximately $24,000 in annual revenue. ATTACHMENTS: Fifth Amendment to License Agreement FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMEKA ADVERTISING THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of Apri127, 2021 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation and Temeka Advertising. In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Fifth Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. On May 26, 1996 the City and Temeka Advertising entered into that certain "License Agreement" providing for the administration of kiosk directional signs within the City. The License Agreement was amended twice on February 27, 2001 (First and Second Amendments), on December 16, 2003 (Third Amendment) and on June 13, 2006 (Fourth Amendment). The May 26, 1996 License Agreement, as amended, shall be known as the "License Agreement." B. The parties now wish to amend the License Agreement to extend its term to June 30, 2022 and to make certain changes to the Agreement. 2. Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "As compensation for grant of this License, Temeka Advertising Incorporated shall pay City a monthly license fee as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. The lease schedule for the "Kiosk" Directional Sign Program shall be as set forth on Exhibit B." 3. Section 8 of the License Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: TERM The term of this License Agreement shall be extended through June 30, 2022. 4. Exhibit B to the License Agreement is amended by substituting a new Exhibit B attached to this Fifth Amendment. 5. Except for the changes to the License Agreement specifically described in this Fifth Amendment, all other terms and conditions of the License Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Date Temeka Advertising, Inc. Date: 'q- I - 2 Date: -� -a I Maryann Edwards, Mayor Attest: Randi Johl, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Lo By: �'' 0 4 Ji ilson, Vice President City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: I�3/1D" 96-110 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT SCHEDULE Lease schedule for the "Kiosk" Directional Sign Program shall be no more and no less than as follows: One time construction fee: Single Face $92.66 $145.00 single face $185.00 double face Double Face $116453 ].Temeka Advertising shall pay City $41.70 per sign per month per sign panel, payable thirty (30) days after the close of each quarter. 2. The City and Temeka Advertising agree to meet annually to review lease price and participation. Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Fifth Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement with Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC for Janitorial Services for City Facilities PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst Stacey Biddle, Management Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Fifth Amendment to the Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services with Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC, in the amount of $335,367.45, for Janitorial Services for City Facilities. BACKGROUND: On May 23, 2017, City Council approved the original agreement, and subsequent amendments each fiscal year to the agreement with Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC to provide janitorial services for City facilities. The original agreement allows for term extensions for continued services through June 20, 2022. Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC has provided services for on -call and emergency services, as well as regular janitorial services in a timely manner and has performed satisfactorily. To support the ongoing need for continued maintenance and services staff recommends the City Council approve the Fifth Amendment to extend the term of the agreement through June 30, 2022, and increase payment in the amount of $335,367.45, for a total contract value of $1,457,509.83. FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $2,035.65 is for services provided at the Police Mall Substation for April — June 2021, and is included in the Fiscal Year 2020-21 Annual Operating Budget. The remaining $333,331.80 is for services to be provided in Fiscal Year 2021-22. Adequate funds will be requested in the Department of Public Works, Maintenance Division Annual Operating Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. ATTACHMENTS: Fifth Amendment — Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC FIFTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MERCHANTS BUILDING MAINTENANCE, LLC JANITORIAL SERVICES FOR CITY FACILITIES THIS FIFTH AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of April 27, 2021 by and between the City of Temecula , a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC, a Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as "Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes. a. On May 23, 2017, the City and Contractor entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services," in the amount of $260,199.00. b. On January 31, 2018, the City and Contractor entered into the First Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services", to add a provision governing security access to City facilities. C. On August 28, 2018, the City and Contractor entered into the Second Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services," to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2019, and to increase the payment in the amount of $277,686.78. d. On July 9, 2019 the City and Contractor entered into the Third Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services," to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2020, increase the payment in the amount of $281,245.32. e. On July 1, 2020 the City and Contractor entered into the Fourth Amendment to that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Minor Maintenance Services," to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2021, increase the payment in the amount of $303,011.28. f. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2022, increase the payment in the amount of $335,367.45, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2022 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 3 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon 12/31 /2020 actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Fifth Amendment amount shall not exceed Three Hundred Thirty -Five Thousand, Three Hundred Sixty -Seven Dollars and Forty -Five Cents ($335,367.45) for additional janitorial services for city facilities for a total Agreement amount of One Million, Four Hundred Fifty -Seven Thousand, Five Hundred Nine Dollars and Eighty -Three Cents ($1,457,509.83). 4. Exhibit B to the Agreement is hereby amended by adding thereto the items set forth on Attachment A to this Amendment, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 12/31 /2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: #V-i d Haas, President By: &A q k JK rista Haas, President CONTRACTOR Merchants Building Maintenance, LLC Contact Person: Angel Meza 1995 W. Holt Avenue Pomona, CA 91768 Phone Number: 909 622-4660 an el ,mbmonline.com City Puric " g gr. Initials an Date: 12/31/2020 ATTACHMENT A 1 *4 " 11 = 1i= Job## Job Name 2020-2021 Change 2021-2022 11931 City of Temecula July 1 2021 - June 30, 2022 11931 Monthly Janitorial Services 11931-A Temecula Public Library $ 4,111.77 $ 295.47 $ 4,407.24 11931-B Community Recreation Center $ 3,069.40 $ 221.32 $ 3,290.72 11931-C Margarita Recreation Center (YMCA) $ 713.38 $ 51.23 $ 764.61 11931-D Harvest Community Room / Office $ 197.42 $ 14.21 $ 211.63 11931-E Temecula Valley Museum $ 806.54 $ 58.56 $ 865.10 11931-F Mary Phillips Senior Center $ 837.56 $ 60.39 $ 897.95 11931-G Civic Center $ 81737.95 $ 622.33 $ 9,360.28 11931-H Parking Garage / Police Office $ 197.63 $ 14.28 $ 211.91 11931-1 Old Town Temecula Community Theather $ 3,216.75 $ 233.70 $ 3,450.45 11931-J Temecula Community Center $ 677.53 $ 49.12 $ 726.65 11931-K Temecula Valley Entrepreneur Exchange $ 1,174.87 $ 85.00 $ 1,259.87 11931-L Facility Operations center $ 988.15 $ 71.36 $ 1,059.51 11931-M Jefferson Recreation Center $ 209.89 $ 14.99 $ 224.88 11931-N Help Center $ 312.10 $ 16.25 $ 328.35 Substation Promenade Mall $ 678.55 $ 39.95 $718.50 2020-2021 Ending Total: $25,929.49 Total Change: $1,848.16 2021-2022 Billing- $27,777.65 • Police Substation Promenade Mall FY2020-2021 (April 1, 2021 - June 30, 2021): $678.55/mo. (FY20-21 total $2,035.66) 12/31 /2020 Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Principal Civil Engineer Stacy Fox, Park Maintenance Supervisor RECOMMENDATION: That City Council: 1. Accept the construction of — Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW 17-29, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On January 14, 2020 the City Council awarded a construction contract to Marina, Landscape, Inc. in the amount of $329,000.00 to complete the Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, PW17-29 (Project), and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders up to 10% of final contact amount, $32,900. The Expanded Recycled Water Conversion Project will convert six sites within the City of Temecula from existing potable water irrigation systems to efficient systems approved for distributing recycled water, the installation of purple pipe equipment and correction of system inefficiencies. This effort was in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements in association with the State of California Department of Water Resources (DWR) Proposition 84 Grant. At the August 27, 2019 meeting, the City Council approved agreement with RCWD for each site within this Project. The retrofitted sites were as follows: 1. Butterfield Stage Road, De Portola Road to south of Crowne Hill Drive — Crowne Hill 2. Butterfield Stage Road, south of Jerez Lane to south of Royal Crest Place — Crowne Hill 3. Butterfield Stage Road Median, Crowne Hill Drive to north of Jerez Lane— Crowne Hill 4. Butterfield Stage Road Median between De Portola Road and Crown Hill Drive — Crowne Hill 5. Rancho California Road and Margarita Road — Temeku Hills 6. Rancho California Road between Meadows Parkway and Margarita Road — Temeku Hills The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works / City Engineer. All work is warranted for a period of one year from December 11, 2020, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the Project. The retention for this project will be released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The Project was funded with DWR Proposition 84 Grant, General Fund, Measure S and Service Level C zones 16, 18 and 20. The amount of the construction contract awarded was $329,000. Approved contract change orders totaled $24,511.59. The resulting total contract amount was $353,511.59. The City is eligible to receive up to $426,029 from RCWD for the design and construction of this Project. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact for accepting the project and filing the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release 4. Project Location Map RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Marina Landscape, Inc., 3707 W. Garden Grove Blvd., Orange, CA 92868 to perform the following work of improvement: EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT Project No. PW17-29 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council on April 27, 2021. That upon said contract the Berkley Insurance Company, 475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, CT 06830 was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT Project No. PW17-29 6. The location of said property is: Various locations within the City of Temecula, California as follows: 1. Butterfield Stage Road, De Portola Road to south of Crowne Hill Drive Crowne Hill 2. Butterfield Stage Road, south of Jerez Lane to south of Royal Crest Place — Crowne Hill 3. Butterfield Stage Road Median, Crowne Hill Drive to north of Jerez Lane— Crowne Hill 4. Butterfield Stage Road Median between De Portola Road and Crown Hill Drive Crowne Hill 5. Rancho California Road and Margarita Road — Temeku Hills 6. Rancho California Road between Meadows Parkway and Margarita Road — Temeku Hills Dated at Temecula, California, this 27' day of April, 2021. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of April, 2021. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk 20-02 SURETY BOND REVIEW FORM The attached surety bond(s) have been reviewed in the following amount(s) PROJECT: iExpanded Recycled Water Conversion Project, Project PW17-29 J CONTRACTOR: I Marina Landscape, Inc. SURETY BOND BOND TYPE NUMBER BOND AMOUNT Berkley Insurance Company Maintenance 0229432 $32,900 Berkley Insurance Company Rider 0229432 $35,351.16 The surety company is ® is not ❑ an admitted company in the State of California: • Financial Strength Rating: A+ XV • A.M. Best #: 003630 • NAIC #: 32603 • CA Company ID #: 3050-2 Insurance Verified By: Risk Wnagement Division Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney NOTES: 04/13/2021 Date Date Surety Rider to increase the bond amount to $35,351.16 to account for change orders. 4/13121 Submitted by Tammy Petricka - CIP CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 0229432 Premium: Included with Performance Bond, MAINTENANCE BOND for EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT PROJECT NO. PW17-29 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT a Marina Landscape, Inc. - 3707 W. Garden Grove Blvd, Orange, CA 92868 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR Corporation (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) (hereinafter called "Principal"), and Berkley Insurance Company 475 Steamboat Road, Greenwich, CT 06830 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") in the penal sum of THIRTY-TWO THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED DOLLARS AND ZERO CENTS ($ 32.900.00) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 4 4th day of January , 20 20 , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT, PROJECT NO. PW17-29. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all deflects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the 8th day of December 20 20 . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred MA:NTENANCE BOND MB•1 The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been duly executed by the Principal and Surety above named, on this 9th day of March , 20 21 (Seal) SURETY: Berkley Insurance Company By: �( Matthew J. C ats (Name) Attorney -in -Fact (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, NOTE: Signature Acknowledgement Signatures. City Attorney PRINCIPAL: Marina ndscape, i B f (Name) (Title) 1 By: I (Na� (Title) s of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal PERFORMANCE BOND PB-2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Orange ) On af � �.� before me, Kristen Ness Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared lAfi Tavakoli who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory eve ence o be the person( whose name( is/a*e subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that heisheAhey executed the same in hisi"rt,e„th& authorized capacity(ies), and that by hisihe0heit signature(s) on the instrument the personal, or the entity upon behalf of which the persons) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. �- KRISTEN NESS �� +: y:� No Public • California WITNESS my hand a official seal. `f5:u. Orange County -�� 3pYk� Commission r 2267970 My Comm. Expires Nov 25, 2022 Signature (Seal) CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of �? ) �( r On before me, Date Here Insert Name and Title ofi e Officer personally appeared . C� 1 lSZL Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person;5)y whose name,(aY is1y76, subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that ,hershetthey executed the same in ffi6.herlthKr authorized capacity,(i4, and that by biAerl it signatureWon the Instrument the persor�(a), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sKacted, executed the instrument. ti S. SVVANSON NotaryPublic- California [ ?' •'"' Orange County 3 Y1. a Commission 2211836 My Comm. Expires Sep 24, 2021 r 11,11"10---ft- Place Notary Seal Above I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and rrect. WITNESS m and a fficial seal. Signature ja"- Signature of Notary Public OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document _ Title or Type of Document:.VW1��rc Number of Pages: _ J_.. _ Signer(s) Other Than Named Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): . Partner — E7 Limited ❑ General 11 Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator Ll Other: Signer Is Representing: Document Date: 3 A bc. .`, Above: Signer's Name: _. ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s):._ _ Partner — ❑ Limited 11 General ❑ Individual D Attorney in Fact E] Trustee 0 Guardian or Conservator C Other: _ Signer Is Representing: ©2014 National Notary Association - www.NationalNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Orange On MAR 0 9 2021 Date personally appeared before me, Summer L. Reyes, Notary Public Matthew J. Coats Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. ` ' T SUMMER L. REYES Notary Public - California f Orange County Commission # 2339686 Comm, Expires Dec 8, 2024 r I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Sigr.)re of aattNotary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: 02014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org - 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item #5907 No. BI-7987c POWER OF ATTORNEY BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE NOTICE: The warning found elsewhere in this Power of Attorney affects the validity thereof. Please review carefully. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Linda D. Coats or Matthew J. Coats of Coats Surety . Insurance Services, Inc. of Laguna Hills, CA its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated N below and to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty Insurance, providing that no single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to the same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its D principal office in their own proper persons. This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to the following o > resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25, 2010: RESOLVED, that, with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chairman of the Board, Chief 0 o Executive Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant y Secretary are hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney -in -fact named therein oto execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations on behalf of the Company, and to affix the corporate seal of the Company to powers of attorney executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such attorney -in -fact and revoke any power of attorney previously granted; and further Q ° RESOLVED, that such power of attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds, undertakings, recognizances, ;a or other suretyship obligations specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the L manner and to the extent therein stated; and further RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attorney -in -fact named; and o further Cd RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Q • power of attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or other suretyship obligation of the Company; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as 3 though manually affixed. The Company may continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any 5 person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Company, notwithstanding the fact that they may have ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued. wIN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Com T y has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its o o corporate seal hereunto affixed this Ky of iJ16% •� CZ Attest: Berkl Insurance Company (Seal) By By [� 4r� o Tr 4rm Je a fter o Executive Vice President & Secretary Se i e resident b � INR WARNING: THIS POWER VALID IF NOT PRINTED ON BLUE "BERKLEY" SECURITY PAPE STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: N ° COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD ) u Swom to before me, a Notary Public in the State of Connecticut, this day of (9 by Ira S. Lederman and Jeffrey M. Ilafter who are sworn to me to be the Executive Vice President Secretary, and t Senior Vice President, respectively, of Berkley Insurance Company. MArRI ARRYUNnRRAKEN /J CONNEOTICUI. T �r MY COMM! SSiON EXPIRES o APHIL30.2024 Aotary Public, State of Connecticut z CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of the original Power of Attorney; that said Power of Attorney has not been revoked or rescinded 3 and that the authority of the Attorney -in -Fact set forth therein, who executed the bond or undertaking to which this Power of y Attorney is attached, is in full force and effect as of this date. W 7 Given under my hand and seal of the Company, this r day of (Seal) VincenForte RIDER To be attached to and forming a part of Maintenance Bond Number 0229432 issued by Berkley Insurance Compan}, as Surety in the amount of Thirty -Two Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars and 00/100s l$32 900.00) effective the 9t" day of March, 2021. on behalf of Marina Landscape, Inc., as Principal, and in favor of City of Temecula, as Obligee, said bond is hereby modified as follows: Bond amount shall be increased: From: Thirtry-Two Thousand Nine Hundred Dollars and 00/100s ($32,900.00) To: Thirty -Five Thousand Three Hundred Fifty -One Dollars and 16/100s ($35,351.16) PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the liability of the Surety under said bond and as changed by this rider shall not be cumulative. Signed, Sealed and dated: March 31, 2021 Marina ands • Pe I C. r Pri acipal BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY -Az-� e�'� Matthew J. Coats, Attorney -in -Fact BSG RIDER 8/06 A Berkley Company Page l oft ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of__ Orange On _ before me, lKiristen Ness, Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer) personally appeared Ali Tavakoli who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person() whose name( isfawe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that helsheAhey executed the same in his'"�;r authorized capacityoes), and that by hisi".�, 'sir signature(s) on the instrument the personal, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(* acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my haled and official seal. Signature"( - (Seal) KRISTEN NE55 Notary Public -California commission w LC6/9/u "` My Comm. Expires Nov 25, 2022 a CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California ) County of Orange ) On MAR 3.12021 before me, Date personally appeared Matthew J. Coats Summer L Reyes, Notary Public Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WhVIER L. REYEs Nntary Pubtic • Cadfiunja s 1 grange County commfssivn P 2339686 µy Comm. Expires flet 8, 20' . y I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature r•' Signatqk of Notary Public Place Notary Seal Above OPTIONAL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Number of Pages: Signer(s) Document Date: Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian or Conservator ❑ Other: Signer Is Representing: ©2014 National Notary Association • www.NationalNotary.org • 1-800-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) Item 45907 No. BI-7987c POWER OF ATTORNEY BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY WILMINGTON, DELAWARE NOTICE: The warning found elsewhere in this Power of Attorney affects the validity thereof. Please review carefully. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY (the "Company"), a corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, having its principal office in Greenwich, CT, has made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint: Linda D. Coats or Malthew J. Coats of Coats Surety - : Insurance Services, Inc, of Laguna Hills, CA its true and lawful Attorney -in -Fact, to sign its name as surety only as delineated v below and to execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver any and all bonds and undertakings, with the exception of Financial Guaranty -r Insurance, providing that no single obligation shall exceed Fifty Million and 00/100 U.S. Dollars (U.S.$50,000,000.00), to the same extent as if such bonds had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected officers of the Company at its principal office in their own proper persons, r f This Power of Attorney shall be construed and enforced in accordance with, and governed by, the laws of the State of Delaware, without giving effect to the principles of conflicts of laws thereof. This Power of Attorney is granted pursuant to the following resolutions which were duly and validly adopted at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company held on January 25, 2010: "J RESOLVED, that, with respect to the Surety business written by Berkley Surety, the Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, President or any Vice President of the Company, in conjunction with the Secretary or any Assistant Secretary are hereby authorized to execute powers of attorney authorizing and qualifying the attorney -in -fact named therein to execute bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations on behalf of the Company, and to affix the corporate seal of the Company to powers of attorney executed pursuant hereto; and said officers may remove any such attorney -in -fact and revoke any power of attorney previously granted; and further RESOLVED, that such power of attorney limits the acts of those named therein to the bonds, undertakings, recognizances, or other suretyship obligations specifically named therein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent therein stated; and further RESOLVED, that such power of attorney revokes all previous powers issued on behalf of the attorney -in -fact named; and further rr1 RESOLVED, that the signature of any authorized officer and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or certification thereof authorizing the execution and delivery of any bond, undertaking, recognizance, or - other suretyship obligation of the Company; and such signature and seal when so used shall have the same force and effect as though manually affixed. The Company may continue to use for the purposes herein stated the facsimile signature of any ~, person or persons who shall have been such officer or officers of the Company, notwithstanding the fact that they may have ceased to be such at the time when such instruments shall be issued. r IN WITNESS WFIEREOF, the Comppa�y has caused these presents to be signed and attested by its appropriate officers and its corporate seal hereunto affixed this �'3 3ay of t#�kjh , _t.Z01C Attest: �f .' Bcrkl Insurance Company r v� (Seal) By _ >ay 1. It ederman Je after f Executive Vice President & Secretary Se i e resident r WARNING: THIS POWER INVALID IF NOT PRINTED ON BLUE "BERKLEY" SECURITY PAPER. STATE OF CONNECTICUT ) ss: COUNTY OF FAIRFIELD ) Sworn to before me, a Notary Public in the State of Connecticut, this day of 2�s l by Ira S. Lederman and Jeffrey M. Rafter who are sworn to me to be the Executive Vice President Secretary, and t Senior Vice President, E respectively, of Berkley Insurance Company. MARIACRUNMAKEM NOTARY PUFF IC CONNECTICUT , MY COAIMISSION EXPIRES APHIU30,2024 ataxy Public, State o Connecticut CERTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of BERKLEY INSURANCE COMPANY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of the original Power of Attorney; that said Power of Attorney has not been revoked or rescinded and that the authority of the Attorney -in -Fact set forth therein, who executed the bond or undertaking to which this Power of Attorney is attached, is in full force and effect as of this date. Given under my hand and seal ofthe Company, this 'day of TdZ (Seal) Vincen orte Please verify the authenticity of the instrument attached to this Power by: Toll -Free Telephone: (800) 456-5486; or Electronic Mail: BSGlnguiry@berkleysurety.com Any written notices, inquiries, claims or demands to the Surety on the bond attached to this Power should be directed to: Berkley Surety 412 Mount Kemble Ave. Suite 31ON Morristown, NJ 07960 Attention: Surety Claims Department Col, Email: BSGCiaim@berkleysurety.com Please include with all communications the bond number and the name of the principal on the bond. Where a claim is being asserted, please set forth generally the basis of the claim. In the case of a payment or performance bond, please also identify the project to which the bond pertains. Berkley Surety is a member company of W. R. Berkley Corporation that underwrites surety business on behalf of Berkley Insurance Company, Berkley Regional Insurance Company and Carolina Casualty Insurance Company. 20-02 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT PROJECT NO. PW17-29 This is to certify that Marina Landscape, Inc. (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as EXPANDED RECYCLED WATER CONVERSION PROJECT, PROJECT NO. PW17-29, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Various Locations Near Butterfield Stage Rd, Temecula, CA 92592 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute NONE ZERO Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR: Dated: 03/ 16/2021 By: Signat6re TERI NGUYEN, C.F.O. Print Name and Title RELEASE R-1 -119, xm�r,47 r low r ++J r xIk 44 -119, xm�r,47 r low r ++J r xIk 44 41L IW 6S,1116�jk Mr. 4 7- 'Pik. -M Ao Of P& 0 OL 77,jxr PO 04, If, 4 V� A A A& k tv . wov r4k LAY lk ILI - L , qV - tw�� Item No. 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive), PW15-14 PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer William Becerra, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive), PW15-14, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On December 11, 2018, the City Council awarded a construction contract to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. in the amount of $2,931,500.10 to complete the Pechanga Parkway Widening (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive), PW 15-14 (Project), and authorized the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $293,150. The scope of the work included providing a Principal Arterial Road with six traffic lanes. These improvements included the widening of the existing roadway and the construction and/or relocation of support structures, storm drain, sewer & water utilities, curb & gutter, and other related items. L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements on May 11, 2020. The retention for this project was released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code Section 7107. The original Contract amount was $2,931,500.10 There were approved change orders in the amount of $206,271.33, which brought the total cost to $3,137,771.43. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the project, and filing and recording the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc., 660 Alpine Way, Escondido, CA 92029 to perform the following work of improvement: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive) Project No. PW15-14 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on April 27, 2021. That upon said contract Argonaut Insurance Company, c/o CMGIA, 20335 Ventura Blvd., Suite 426, Woodland Hills, CA 91364, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Pechanga Parkway Widening Project (From Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive) Project No. PW15-14 6. The location of said property is: along Pechanga Parkway, from Via Gilberto to North Casino Drive, Temecula, California. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27t" day of April, 2021. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 27th day of April, 2021. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk 1 r" 1 #18-268// SURETY BOND REVIEW FORM The attached surety bond(s) have been reviewed in the following amount(s). PROJECT: Pechanga Parkway Widening (from Via Gilberto to North Casino Dr.) Project No. PW15-14 CONTRACTOR: I L.C. Paving & Sealing, Inc. SURETY Arqonaut Insurance Companv BOND TYPE BOND NUMBER BOND AMOUNT Maintenance CMGP0001895 $313,777.14 The surety company is ® is not ❑ an admitted company in the State of California: ■ Financial Strength Rating: A- XIV ■ A.M. Best #: 002056 ■ NAIC #: 19801 ■ CA Company ID #: 1523-0 Insurance Verified By: Risk Management Division Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney NOTES: 03/12/2021 Date Date 3-29-21 Please see attached corporate document naming Jose A. Salinas as sole officer of the corporation. Submitted by Tammy Petricka 3/12/21 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. CMC-P0001895 MAINTENANCE BOND for PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING (FROM VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE) PROJECT NO. PW15-14 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT LC Paving & Sealing, Inc. 660 Alpine Way Escondido CA 92029 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a Corporation (hereinafter called "Principal"), and (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) Argonaut Insurance Company c/o CMGIA - 20335 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 426 Woodland Hills, CA 91364 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called °Owner")In the penal Sum of Three Hundred Thirteen Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Seven DOLLARS AND Fourteen CENTS ($313 7�77.14) in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 11th day of December , 2018 a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING (FROM VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE), PROJECT NO. PW15-14. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of ❑lie year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the I Ith day of May , 2020 NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred MAINTENANCE BOND MB-1 by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 10th day of March 20 21 . (Seal) SURETY: �Onjo%+ ce Kornpany PRINCIPALI LC PAying dealing, Inc. (Name) f Attorney -in -Fact (Title) (Title) By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: (Name) Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. MAINTENANCE BOND MB_2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or Lali6ty of that document. State of California County of San Diego On.before me, personally appeared Jose A. Salinas Marisa Haas, Notary Public (insert name and title of the officer) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. �rrM �)V.."'My MARISA ANN HAAS WITNESS my hand and official seal. Q ;rNotary Public - California San Diego County Commission a 2306519 Comm. Expires Sep 24, 2023 Signature (Seal) Bond No.: CMGP0001896 Argonaut Insurance Company Deliveries Only: 225 W. Washington, 24th Floor Chicago, IL 60606 United States Postal Service: P.O. Box 469011, San Antonio, TX 78246 POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the Argonaut Insurance Company, a Corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of Illinois and having its principal office in the County of Cook, Illinois does hereby nominate, constitute and appoint: Gabriella Grades Sh 1o_Lee_Losino, Stephanie Hope Shear, Elizabeth Santos. Stacey Garcia, Matthew Dionisio Their true and lawful agent(s) and attomey(s)-in-fact, each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above, to make, execute, sea] and deliver for and on its behalf as surety, and as its act and deed any and all bonds, contracts, agreements of indemnity and other undertakings in suretyship provided, however, that the penal sum of any one such instrument executed hereunder shall not exceed the sum of: $15.000.000,00 This Power of Attorney is granted and is signed and sealed under and by the authority of the following Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of Argonaut Insurance Company: x "RESOLVED, That the President, Senior Vice President, Vice President, Assistant Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer and each of them hereby is authorized to execute powers of attorney, and such authority can be executed by use of facsimile signature, which may be attested or acknowledged by any officer or attorney, of the Company, qualifying the attorney or attorneys named in the given power of attorney, to execute in behalf of, and acknowledge as the act and deed of the Argonaut Insurance Company, all bond undertakings and contracts of suretyship, and to affix the corporate seal thereto." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Argonaut Insurance Company has caused its official seal to be hereunto affixed and these presents to be signed by its duly authorized officer on the 8th day of May, 2017. Argonaut Insurance Company ��seroRe�C�no SEAL: by: 1946 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF HARRIS SS: Joshua C. Betz, Senior Vice President On this 8th day of May, 2017 A.D., before me, a Notary Public of the State of Texas, in and for the County of Harris, duly commissioned and qualified, came THE ABOVE OFFICER OF THE COMPANY, to me personally known to be the individual and officer described in, and who executed the preceding instrument, and he acknowledged the execution of same, and being by me duly sworn, deposed and said that he is the officer of the said Company aforesaid, and that the seal affixed to the preceding instrument is the Corporate Seal of said Company, and the said Corporate Seal and his signature as officer were duly affixed and subscribed to the said instrument by the authority and direction of the said corporation, and that Resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of said Company, referred to in the preceding instrument is now in force. IN TESTIMONY, WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed my Official Seal at the County of Harris, the day and year first above written. ,1� • y n r t�i. t ,. M r 1 �Tiu�kll `YY) . ` YY`�t�o.Yz r1 �4�.r•F n (Notary Public) I, the undersigned Officer of the Argonaut Insurance Company, Illinois Corporation, do hereby certify that the original POWER OF ATTORNEY of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy is still in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, and affixed the Seal of said Company, on the 10t1 day of March , 2021 . c•�.�5uk.a;yC ,.,�. SEAi.nyy�: Iy.. .H�a.' •�i ■�Inll.aH ���'" Y' James Bluzard , Vice President -Surety IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS ON AUTHENTICITY OF THIS DOCUMENT CALL (833) 820 - 9137. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1188 1 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies ordy the identity of the individual who signed the j document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of Califomia ] County of On LIAR 10 2021 before me, Lucas Malcolm -Shane Patterson, Notary Public Date Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer personally appeared Gabriella Grad Name(s) of Signer(s) who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/shelthey executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. tuCAS W._`rai M 5HA10 PA`TERSON WITNESS my hand and official seal. lClls Signature- _ Signature of Notary Public "The notary commission is extended pursuant to Executive Order N-63-20 and Executive Order N-71-20" Place Notary Seal Above OPnONAiL Though this section is optional, completing this information can deter alteration of the docu or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: `W Number of Pages: Signer's) Caipacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: _-_- Other Than Named lJ Corporate Officer — Title(s): -1 Partner — LJ Limited C) Gene _1 Individual L! Atto Fact J Trustee ardian or Conservator -Other-... Signer's Name: L_ Corporate Officer — Ti(le(s), i -' Partner — 'I Limited II General L Individual ;'_ I Attomey in Fact _i Trustee 1 Guardian or Conservator __. Other: Signer Is Representing: 02014 National Notary Association - www.NationaiNotary.org - 1-BOG-US NOTARY (1-800-876-6827) hem #5907 18-268 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING (FROM VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE) PROJECT NO. PW15-14 This is to certify that L.C. PAVING & SEALING, INC. (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PECHANGA PARKWAY WIDENING (FROM VIA GILBERTO TO NORTH CASINO DRIVE), PROJECT NO. PW15-14, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: PECHANGA PKWY & WOLF VALLEY ROAD, TEMECULA, CA ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description j Dollar Amount to Dispute I NONE Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. Dated: March 12, 2021 By. nature Jose A. Salinas, President Print Name and Title RELEASE R-1 Item No. 18 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER at 8:02 PM: President Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 12. Approve Action Minutes of March 23, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of March 23, 2021. 13. Approve an Amendment to the Agreement Between Temecula Community Services District and Social Work Action Group (At the Request of the Human Services Subcommittee Mayor Edwards and Council Member Alexander) Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the first amendment to the agreement between Temecula Community Services District and Social Work Action Group. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 8:06 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 27, 2021 at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 19 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 PREPARED BY: Jordan Snider, Accountant II RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached Financial Statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Temecula Community Services District for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. Please see the attached Financial Statements for an analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Combining Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2020 2. Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balance — Budget and Actual for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMBINING BALANCE SHEET as of September 30, 2020 ASSETS: Cash and Investments Restricted Cash and Investments Wolf Creek Receivables TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES: Other Current Liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES: Unavailable Revenues TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES FUND BALANCES: Restricted For: Community Services TOTAL FUND BALANCES TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, and FUND BALANCES NOTE: Balances are unaudited Parks & Service Service Level Service Level Recreation Level B C Slope D Refuse Street Lights Maintenance Recycling $ 1,204,949 $ 211,737 $ 1,612,974 $ 143,740 - - 315,881 - 44,045 598 14,662 71,826 $ 1,248,994 $ 212,335 $ 1,943,517 $ 215,566 $ 692,317 $ 33,318 $ 440,239 $ 3,790 692,317 33,318 440,239 3,790 40,920 - - - 40,920 - - - 515,757 179,017 1,503,278 211,776 515,757 179,017 1,503,278 211,776 $ 1,248,994 $ 212,335 $ 1,943,517 $ 215,566 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT COMBINING BALANCE SHEET as of September 30, 2020 ASSETS: Cash and Investments Restricted Cash and Investments Wolf Creek Receivables TOTAL ASSETS LIABILITIES: Other Current Liabilities TOTAL LIABILITIES DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES: Unavailable Revenues TOTAL DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES FUND BALANCES: Restricted For: Community Services TOTAL FUND BALANCES Service Level R Service Level Street Road L Lake Park Library Public Art Maintenance Maintenance Total $ 27,906 $ 392,183 $ 462,107 $ 62,634 $ 4,118,230 - - - - 315,881 2,416 2,385 4,301 150 140,383 $ 30,322 $ 394,568 $ 466,408 $ 62,784 $ 4,574,494 $ - $ 34,338 $ 23,007 $ - 34,338 23,007 - $ 1,227,009 - 1,227,009 2,350 - 3,045 - 46,315 2,350 - 3,045 - 46,315 27,972 360,230 440,356 62,784 3,301,170 27,972 360,230 440,356 62,784 3,301,170 TOTAL LIABILITIES, DEFERRED INFLOWS OF RESOURCES, and FUND BALANCES $ NOTE: Balances are unaudited 30,322 $ 394,568 $ 466,408 $ 62,784 $ 4,574,494 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL CITYWIDE OPERATIONS for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total % Amended YTD Activity Encumbrances Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: Special Tax (Measure C) $ 1,880,264 $ 46,513 $ - $ 46,513 2% Recreation Funding(Measure S) 8,297,243 2,074,310 - 2,074,310 25% Recreation Program 2,507,218 135,094 - 135,094 5% Investment Interest 2,800 941 - 941 34% TOTAL REVENUES 12,687,525 2,256,858 - 2,256,858 18% EXPENDITURES: General Operations 3,422,976 968,816 87,288 1,056,104 31 % Senior Center 374,070 84,205 26,025 110,230 29% Community Recreation Center (CRC) 1,044,558 181,417 96,452 277,869 27% Special Events 1,245,991 143,834 342,313 486,147 39% Temecula Community Center (TCC) 392,498 90,508 27,444 117,952 30% Museum 450,723 90,581 42,467 133,048 30% Aquatics 1,215,529 300,980 85,816 386,796 32% Sports 349,908 46,788 82,997 129,785 37% Children's Museum 82,535 12,562 13,081 25,643 31 % Community Theater 1,350,740 256,564 108,789 365,353 27% Cultural Arts 213,039 38,700 10,800 49,500 23% Human Services 190,655 30,516 10,217 40,733 21 % Margarita Recreation Center 267,491 35,041 15,577 50,618 19% Jefferson Recreation Center 57,220 9,044 8,601 17,645 31 % Contract Classes 879,067 41,275 1,000 42,275 5% Park Rangers 429,751 122,885 4,478 127,363 30% Responsible Compassion 609,222 133,129 - 133,129 22% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 12,575,973 2,586,845 963,345 3,550,190 28% Transfers Out - - Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures and Transfers 111,552 (329,987) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 845,744 845,744 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 957,296 $ 515,757 NOTES: (1) Special assessment taxes are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) These variances are due to the closures and cancellations due to COVID-19 pandemic. (1) (2) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTS for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: Assessments Recreation Funding(Measure S) Investment Interest TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Salaries and Wages Street Lighting Fees Property Tax Admin Fees TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01 /2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Annual Total YTD % of Amended Activity Budget Budget $ 640,767 $ 5,983 1 % 73,168 18,292 25% - 365 - 713,935 24,640 3% 22,718 5,937 26% 540,000 97,053 18% 13,005 - 0% 575,723 102,990 18% 138,212 (78,350) 257,367 257,367 $ 395,579 $ 179,017 NOTES: (1) Special assessment taxes are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments, fluctuating interest rates, and improved cash flows. (3) The cost of Street Lighting fees has decreased due to the acquisition of the street lights from Southern CA Edison and the conversion to LED bulbs. (1) (2) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SLOPE MAINTENANCE for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total YTD Total Encumbrances % of Budget Activity Activity Budget REVENUES: Assessments $ 1,586,674 $ 19,732 $ - $ 19,732 1 % Investment Interest 8,995 2,760 - 2,760 31 % TOTAL REVENUES 1,595,669 22,492 - 22,492 1 % EXPENDITURES: Zone 1 Saddlewood 40,049 10,838 20,250 31,088 78% Zone 2 Winchester Creek 44,961 8,250 16,003 24,253 54% Zone 3 Rancho Highlands 48,865 9,418 21,558 30,976 63% Zone 4 The Vineyards 6,418 1,520 2,775 4,295 67% Zone 5 Signet Series 39,413 8,562 14,574 23,136 59% Zone 6 Woodcrest Country 29,437 5,394 8,404 13,798 47% Zone 7 Ridgeview 14,386 3,457 5,150 8,607 60% Zone 8 Village Grove 150,412 33,535 67,626 101,161 67% Zone 9 Rancho Solana 5,773 566 895 1,461 25% Zone 10 Martinique 9,497 1,990 2,824 4,814 51 % Zone 11 Meadowview 2,376 727 563 1,290 54% Zone 12 Vintage Hills 108,658 23,352 46,921 70,273 65% Zone 13 Presley Development 35,532 7,784 11,526 19,310 54% Zone 14 Morrison Homes 14,833 3,465 4,526 7,991 54% Zone 15 Barclay Estates 8,975 1,822 3,953 5,775 64% Zone 16 Tradewinds 40,657 6,762 8,470 15,232 37% Zone 17 Monte Vista 2,104 445 643 1,088 52% Zone 18 Temeku Hills 104,355 23,922 51,252 75,174 72% Zone 19 Chantemar 67,382 12,501 33,062 45,563 68% Zone 20 Crowne Hill 197,757 38,226 86,715 124,941 63% Zone 21 Vail Ranch 302,372 51,266 151,318 202,584 67% Zone 22 Sutton Place 4,210 874 1,459 2,333 55% Zone 23 Pheasent Run 8,332 1,564 2,801 4,365 52% Zone 24 Harveston 181,464 34,923 99,773 134,696 74% Zone 25 Serena Hills 49,975 9,367 18,251 27,618 55% Zone 26 Gallery Tradition 2,240 480 623 1,103 49% Zone 27 Avondale 8,869 3,037 2,869 5,906 67% Zone 28 Wolf Creek 361,805 62,525 83,507 146,032 40% Zone 29 Gallery Portrait 3,005 519 905 1,424 47% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,894,112 367,091 769,196 1,136,287 60% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (298,443) (344,599) Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01 /2020 1,847,877 1,847,877 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 1,549,434 $ 1,503,278 NOTES: (1) Special assessment taxes are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in expenditures is due to encumbrances that are recorded for the entire fiscal year. (1) (2) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SERVICE LEVEL D - REFUSE COLLECTION, RECYCLING & STREET SWEEPING for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total YTD Encumbrances Total aka of Budget Budget Activity Activity REVENUES: Assessments $ 8,634,245 $ 81,397 $ - $ 81,397 1 % Recycling Program/Grant 18,500 - - - 0% Investment Interest 1,200 163 - 163 14% Miscellaneous 23,000 - - - 0% TOTAL REVENUES 8,676,945 81,560 - 81,560 1 % EXPENDITURES: Salaries and Wages 59,460 15,554 - 15,554 26% Department of Conservation Grant 23,000 - - - 0% Refuse Hauling 8,543,282 - - - 0% Operating Expenditures 60,241 2,165 - 2,165 4% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 8,685,983 17,719 - 17,719 0% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (9,038) 63,841 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 147,935 147,935 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 138,897 $ 211,776 NOTES: (1) Recycling grant program revenues are expected to be received early in FY20-21. (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments, fluctuating interest rates, and improved cash flows. (3) The variance in expenditures is due to the first payment to CR&R for refuse hauling services is not due until January 2020. (1) (2) (3) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SERVICE LEVEL R - STREETS AND ROADS for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: Assessments Investment Interest Reimbursement Charges TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Emergency Street Maintenance Property Tax Admin Fees TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01 /2020 9/30/2020 Annual Amended Budget $ 5,532 $ 120 5,652 15,000 150 15,150 (9,498) 20,778 Total YTD Activity 115 29 7,050 7,194 7,194 20,778 $ 11,280 $ 27,972 % of Budget 2% 24% 127% NOTES: (1) Special assessment taxes are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance is due to receipt of a FEMA claim for a prior year storm event. (3) The variance is due to timing of Emergency Street Maintenance services during this quarter. 0% 0% 0% TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL SERVICE LEVEL L - LAKE PARK MAINTENANCE for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Amended Total YTD Encumbrances Total % of Budget Activity Activity Budget REVENUES: Assessments Harveston Lake Boat Fees Investment Interest TOTAL REVENUES EXPENDITURES: Salaries and Wages Operating Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01 /2019 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 246,732 $ 9,995 $ - $ 9,995 4% (1) 4,200 428 - 428 10% 2,300 645 - 645 28% 253,232 11,068 - 11,068 4% 25,849 6,653 - 6,653 26% 245,824 63,174 116,883 180,057 73% (2) 271,673 69,827 116,883 186,710 69% (18,441) (58,759) $ 400,548 $ 360,230 NOTES: (1) Special assessment taxes are primarily received in January and May each fiscal year. (2) The variance in expenditures is due to encumbrances that are recorded for Lake Park, Rehabilitation, and Landscape maintenance TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL TEMECULA LIBRARY for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Annual Total YTD Total % of Amended Activity Encumbrances Activity Budget Budget REVENUES: Library Services $ 105,860 $ - $ $ - 0% Recreation Funding(Measure S) 847,181 211,796 211,796 25% Investment Interest 2,200 (299) (299) -14% TOTAL REVENUES 955,241 211,497 211,497 22% EXPENDITURES: Salaries and Wages 113,419 32,539 32,539 29% Operating Expenditures 984,182 121,254 201,540 322,794 33% TOTAL EXPENDITURES 1,097,601 153,793 201,540 355,333 32% Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures (142,360) 57,704 Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01/2020 382,652 382,652 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 $ 240,292 $ 440,356 NOTES: (1) The variance is due to the Library being closed (2) The variance is due to the change in the fair value on investments, fluctuating interest rates, and improved cash flows. (3) The variance in expenditures is due to encumbrances that are recorded for the entire fiscal year. (3) TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES, and CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE - BUDGET AND ACTUAL PUBLIC ART for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 REVENUES: Public Art Revenues Investment Interest TOTAL REVENUES Other Financing Sources (Uses): Operating Expenditures TOTAL EXPENDITURES Revenues Over/(Under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources/(Uses) Transfers Out Beginning Fund Balance as of 7/01 /2020 Ending Fund Balance as of 9/30/2020 Annual Amended Total YTD % of Budget Activity Budget $ 13,055 $ 6,065 46% 200 87 44% 13,255 6,152 46% 13,255 6,152 56,632 56,632 $ 69,887 $ 62,784 Item No. 20 THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Financial Statements for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors receive and file the Financial Statements for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. BACKGROUND: The attached Financial Statements reflect the unaudited activity of the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency for the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020. Please see the attached Financial Statements for analytical review of financial activity. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Statement of Fiduciary Net Position as of September 30, 2020 2. Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position -for the 1 st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 SARDA STATEMENT OF FIDUCIARY NET POSITION As of September 30, 2020 Successor Agency to the Former RDA ASSETS: Cash, Restricted and Investments $ 14,542,592 Receivables 5,049 Prepaid Insurance 1,278,717 Land Held for Resale 98,484 Land 3,819,107 Property, Plant, and Equipment (net of accumulated depreciation) 24,186,444 TOTAL ASSETS $ 43,930,393 DEFERRED OUTFLOW OF RESOURCES: Deferred Amounts on Refundings $ 5,976,846 TOTAL DEFERRED OUTFLOWS 5,976,846 LIABILITIES: Accounts Payable $ 20,000 Advances from City-SERAF 5,250,954 Accrued Interest Payable 930,790 Net Bonds Payable 78,371,378 (1) TOTAL LIABILITIES 84,573,122 NET POSITION/(DEFICIT): TOTAL NET POSITION/(DEFICIT) $ (34,665,883) (2) NOTES: Note: Amounts are unaudited (1) Net Bonds Payable includes the TABs 2017 Refunding Bonds and related unamortized bond premiums/discounts. (2) The deficit balance is primarily attributed to SARDA long term debt, which will be reduced when future revenues are received and matched with their annual debt service payments. SARDA STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN FIDUCIARY NET POSITION For the 1st Quarter Ended September 30, 2020 Successor Agency to the Former RDA ADDITIONS: Investment Earnings $ 3,383 TOTAL ADDITIONS 3,383 DEDUCTIONS: Affordable Housing Obligations 295,000 Interest 804,639 Depreciation 294,999 Bond Insurance Premium 17,191 TOTAL DEDUCTIONS 1,411,829 Change in Net Position (1,408,446) Net Position/(Deficit) as of July 1, 2020 (33,552,437) Net Position/(Deficit) as of September 30, 2020 $ (34,960,883) (1) Note: Amounts are unaudited (1) The deficit balance is primarily attributed to SARDA long term debt, which will be reduced when future revenues are received and matched with their annual debt service payments. Item No. 21 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER at 8:06 pm: Chair Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart TPFA PUBLIC COMMENTS — None TPFA CONSENT CALENDAR 14. Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)Generally Located West of Date Street Between Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive Recommendation: That the Board of Directors: 1. Hold a public hearing regarding the formation of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) (the "CFD"), the levy of special taxes in the CFD, and the issuance of bonds by the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for the CFD, and adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, AND PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-05 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Schwank, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Stewart opposing. 2. That the Board of Directors hold an election regarding the CFD, and adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN — COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Stewart opposing. 3. That the Board of Directors have the first reading of the ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 2021-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Stewart opposing. TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS N TPFA ADJOURNMENT At 8:29 PM, the Temecula Public Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 5:30 PM, for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 22 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 Levying Special Taxes Within Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) Generally Located West of Date Street Between Ynez Road and Temecula Center Drive (Second Reading) PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 2021-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. With the exception of urgency ordinances, Government Code Section 36934 requires two readings of standard ordinances more than five days apart. Ordinances must be read in full at the time of introduction or passage unless a motion waiving the reading is adopted by a majority of the Board of Directors present. Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 was first introduced at a noticed public hearing at the regularly scheduled meeting of April 13, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: TPFA Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 2021-01 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.20-01 (HEIRLOOM FARMS) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. On February 23, 2021, this Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein — (Heirloom Farms)" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to establish the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms) pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), to finance the costs of certain public improvements (the "Facilities") and of certain public services (the "Services"). Section 2. Notice was published as required by the Law of the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the costs of the Facilities. Section 3. The Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing on the District to be held on April 13, 2021 and on such date this Board of Directors held the public hearing relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District. Section 4. At the public hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of special taxes in the District were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held. Section 5. Subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, and Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District" (the "Resolution of Formation"), "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)" (the "Resolution of Necessity") and "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Calling Special Election Within Community Facilities District No. 20-01 (Heirloom Farms)", which resolutions established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax with the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying the special tax and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively. Section 6. On April 13, 2021 an election was held within the District in which the sole eligible landowner elector approved said propositions. Section 7. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District, pursuant to the Law, at the rate and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District approved by the Resolution of Formation (the "Rate and Method") which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in Fiscal Year 2022-2023 and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds issued by the Authority for the District (the "Bonds") as contemplated by the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Necessity, payment in full all costs of administering the District, and so long as necessary to pay for the Services. Section 8. The Authority Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to work with the Finance Director for the City of Temecula (who is identified as the "CFD Administrator" in the Rate and Method) each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Rate and Method. Section 9. Properties or entities of the State, federal or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes, to the extent set forth in the Rate and Method attached as Exhibit B to the Resolution of Intention. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method. Section 10. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Law and in the Resolution of Formation including the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the replenishment of the reserves for the Bonds, the payment of the costs to provide the Facilities and the Services, the costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula in administering the District, and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. Section 11. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the secured real property tax roll in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 5286.1 of the California Government Code shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector of the County of Riverside and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may collect one or more installments of the special taxes on any one or more parcels in the District by means of direct billing by the Authority N of the property owners within the District, if any of the Bonds bear interest at a variable interest rate, or otherwise if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. In such event, the special taxes shall become delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the applicable property owners. Section 12. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of April, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. TPFA 2021-01 was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 131h day of April, 2021, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary Item No. 23 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Fiscal Year 2021-22 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2021-22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM BACKGROUND: The Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program was established through the Housing and Community Development Act in 1974. The primary purpose of CDBG funding is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for persons of low and moderate income. From 1992 to 2012, the City participated in the Riverside County Economic Development Agency Entitlement Program to receive CDBG funding. On April 10, 2012, City Council adopted the first Five -Year Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), authorizing the City to become an Entitlement Community and direct recipient of CDBG funds. In preparation for the 2021-22 Action Plan, staff held two virtual CDBG community workshops online (due to the COVID-19 pandemic) on Tuesday, December 8, 2020. A morning and evening session was provided to accommodate users with varying work schedules. Wi-Fi Gardens are available in strategic areas throughout the City to support students and users who may not be able to afford internet access. An additional sub -recipient workshop will be held in June, prior to the start of the program year. The workshops encouraged participation regarding CDBG funding and provided technical assistance to applicants. Based on input gathered from the public, and the adopted ConPlan, the following objectives continue to guide the City in allocating CDBG funds: • Promote the development of affordable housing. • Preserve the existing housing stock. • Ensure equal access to housing opportunities. • Provide public services for low and moderate income residents. • Provide public services for residents with special needs. • Provide public services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness. • Provide public services for seniors and veterans. • Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure. • Promote economic opportunity. • Amend land use and zoning laws to promote the development of affordable housing. • Provide greater access to public facilities for persons with disabilities. The Finance Committee, consisting of Mayor Edwards and Mayor Pro Tem Rahn, convened on February 23, 2021 to make recommendations on CDBG funding for the upcoming fiscal year. Their recommendations are reflected in this report. The draft 2021-22 Annual Action Plan was available for public review from March 28, 2021 through April 27, 2021. 2021-22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN The City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $556,445 through the Community Development Block Grant program for the 2021-22 program year. This anticipated allocation was lowered from $559,907 between the Finance Committee meeting on February 23, 2021, and the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. Consequently, anticipated amounts have been adjusted to reflect allocations for most projects. A maximum of 20 percent maybe allocated for administration of the program, and a maximum of 15 percent may be allocated for public services, with the remainder, approximately $361,851.30, available for capital improvement projects. The breakdown of the estimated budget is demonstrated in the following chart. 2021-22 CDBG Budget (Original) Updated Allocation from HUD 2021-22 Allocation $559,444.OG $555,982.00 2021-22 Program Income $0:00 $0.00 Available Unallocated/Reprogrammed Funds $463.00 $463.00 Total Funds Available $559, $556,445.00 �blic Service Allocation Maximum 15% of 2021-22 Allocation _ $83,916.60 $83,397.30 Total Public Service Funds Available $83,397.30 2021-22 Allocation $«9-444.00 $555,982.00 2021-22 Program Income $0 00 $0.00 Minus Allocated Administrative Funds $1 1�QO $111,196.40 Minus Allocated Public Service Funds $83,916. $83,397.30 Plus Available Reprogrammed Funds $463.99 $463.00 Total Capital Improvements Funds Available $36 , $361,851.30 Administrative Funds Maximum 20% of 2021-22 Allocation c, 1'-888.oO $111,196.40 Total Administrative Funds Available $11 ,TSl=, QSCO $111,196.40 Public Services A maximum of $83,397.30 (15%) may be allocated for public services during the fiscal year. Staff completed an extensive review of the applications to determine the benefit to low and moderate - income persons, activity need, cost efficiency, effectiveness, activity management, and experience and past performance. A summary of the funding recommendations of the Finance Committee is below. All applicants for the 2021-22 funding period satisfy at least one Consolidated Plan priority, and are therefore eligible for funding. Subcommite Updated HUC Organization Program Name FY 21-22 Request Recommendation Allocation Recommendations 1 Community Mission of Hope Housing and Food Resource Center $ 15,000 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 2 Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Anti Violence Education and Crisis $ 5,491 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 Intervention to Prevent Homelessness 3 Safe AlternativS�E) Everyone, Inc. Creating SAFE Farm ies $ 10,000 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 4 Voices for Children Court Appointed Special Advocate $ 10,000 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 (CASA) 5 City of Temecula Homeless Prevention & Diversion $ 20,000 $ 20,000 $ 20,001.30 Program 6 Boys & Girls f Southwest Before and After School Care for Kids $ 20,000 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 wiry 7 Assistance League ofTemecula Valley Operation School Bell $ 10,000 $ 6,902 $ 6,816.00 8 Fair Housing Council ofRiverside Comprehensive Fair Housing Program $ 25,000 $ 22,500 $ 22,500.00 County 1 s 83,397 Housing Activities and Capital Improvement Projects The City received one application for housing funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program proposes to provide three to five low-income households with home repair and maintenance services to keep homes affordable. The Finance Committee recommended funding Habitat for Humanity $50,000 from capital improvement funds. The Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repairs Program meets the ConPlan goal of "preserv[ing] the existing housing stock." The Finance Committee recommended that the remainder of the CIP funds ($311,851.30) be allocated towards high priority accessibility projects in City parks and facilities, as identified in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan. Financial allocations towards these projects satisfy the ConPlan goal of "provid[ing] greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities." FISCAL IMPACT: Upon the approval of the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula anticipates receiving approximately $556,445 through the CDBG program for 2021-22, and approximately $2.75 million through the duration of the Consolidated Plan cycle. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A: 2021-22 Annual Action Plan 3. Notice of Public Hearing (English and Spanish) RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE 2021-22 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN AS AN APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012; B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions; C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011 initiating the City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action Plan, and the Citizen Participation Plan; D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-43 on June 28, 2016, approving the updated Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration of federal CDBG funds; E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-57 on September 23, 2016, approving the 2017-21 Assessment of Fair Housing; F. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-24 on April 25, 2017, approving the 2017-21 Five -Year Consolidated Plan and 2017-18 Annual Action Plan; G. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-28 on April 24, 2018, approving the 2018-19 Annual Action Plan; H. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-25 on April 23, 2019, approving the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan; H. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-25 on April 28, 2020, approving the 2020-21 Annual Action Plan; L The City of Temecula has prepared an Annual Action Plan to implement the fifth year of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan; J. The Annual Action Plan includes HUD entitlement funding and the proposed use of Federal CDBG funds for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2021-22; K. The 2021-22 Annual Action Plan was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law; L. The Annual Action Plan is required by the US Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), and must be approved by that agency for the City to receive federal CDBG funds each year. M. At the conclusion of the Finance Subcommittee meeting and after due consideration of the testimony, the Finance Subcommittee provided funding recommendations for the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan on February 23, 2021; N. The 2021-22 Annual Action Plan was available for public review between March 28, 2021 and April 27, 2021; O. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan on April 27, 2021 at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. P. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the City Council approved the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. Q. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Plan hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Part 91 Consolidated Submissions For Community Planning And Development Programs (24 CFR Part 91) each entitlement jurisdiction must adopt a Five-year Consolidated Plan that states its overall plan to develop a viable urban community by providing for decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate -income persons, and prepare an Annual Action Plan each year describing the activities the jurisdiction will undertake during the next year to address those five-year priority needs and objectives; B. The City Council must adopt a plan that serves the following functions: 1. A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders; 2. A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for jurisdictions; 3. A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and 4. A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the Annual Action Plan (2019-20) is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1) because the 2019-20 Annual Action Plan is a resource identification study and the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section 15262 and 15378(b)(4). Section 4. Approvals. A. The City Council hereby approves the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan, set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD to obtain the annual CDBG allocation of the federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the City Manager, or his designee, to serve as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. B. The City Council hereby approves an application for CDBG Entitlement funds in the amount of $556,445; the allocation of the CDBG current year program administration of $111,196.40; the allocation of the CDBG current year program activities of $445,248.60; Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of April, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk City of Temecula 2021-22 Community Development Block Grant Annual Action Plan City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 May 2021 Draft a� CX` The H eart of Southern California VA in a Country Action Plan 2021-2022 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 City of Temecula Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary.......................................................................................................................................1 AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.200(c), 91.220(b)........................................................................1 TheProcess................................................................................................................................................... 9 PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b)............................................................................. 9 AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I).................................................................................10 AP-12 Citizen Participation.....................................................................................................................29 AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2)........................................................................................... 33 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives........................................................................................................37 AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d).....................................................................................................................41 AP-38 Project Summary..........................................................................................................................44 AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f).............................................................................................50 AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.220(g)...................................................................................................53 AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h)...........................................................................................................56 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i)............................................................57 AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j)...................................................................................61 AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k)............................................................................................................ 63 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(I)(1,2,4)......................................................................66 Alternate/Local Data Sources........................................................................................................... Appendix A Citizen Participation and Consultation.....................................................................................Appendix B Grantee Unique Appendices.....................................................................................................Appendix C Map of Eligible Census Block Groups....................................................................................... Appendix D Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications.......................................................................Appendix E Action Plan 2021-2022 City of Temecula OMB Control No: 2506-0117 Executive Summary AP-05 Executive Summary - 24 CFR 91.2OO(c), 91.22O(b) 1. Introduction On April 25, 2017, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted its Five -Year Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan. The Consolidated Plan describes the City's housing and community development needs, as well as strategies and activities to address those needs over a five-year period using entitlement grant funds provided by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The 2021-2022 Action Plan, which covers July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022, represents the fifth year in that five-year plan. The City's grant program is consistent with HUD's national strategy to provide decent housing opportunities, a suitable living environment and economic opportunities particularlyfor low- and moderate -income persons. Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program. The primary objective of the CDBG Program is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable living environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for persons of low- and moderate -income. CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the following national objectives: • Benefit low- and moderate -income persons; • Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or • Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency. Each year, the City certifies with the submission of its Annual Action Plan that it has given maximum feasible priority to activities, which meet the first objective above. Additionally, the City certifies that no less than 70 percent of the CDBG funds received, over a three-year certification period, will be designed to benefit low- and moderate -income persons. For Program Year 2021-2022, 100 percent of the CDBG activities primarily benefit low- and moderate -income persons. 2021-2022 Program Year Funding The City has been granted $555,982 in Community Development Block Grant funds in Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Coupled with an availability of $463 from previously closed out programs, the City will have a total of $556,445 to spend during program year 2021-2022. The proposed breakdown of those funds can be found in the following sections. 1 2021-2022 CDBG Program Public Service Activities Fair Housing Council Comprehensive Fair Housing Program $22,500 City of Temecula Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program $20,001.30 Boys and Girls Club Before and After School Care for Kids $6,816 Assistance League of Temecula Valley Operation School Bell $6,816 SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Temecula Safe and Healthy Families $6,816 Voices for Children Court Appointed Special Advocate (CASA) Program $6,816 Community Mission of Hope Housing and Food Resource Center $6,816 Riverside County Rape Crisis Center $6,816 Capital Improvement Activities ADA Compliance Program (Mary Phillips Senior Center) $311,851.30 Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program $50,000 Program Administration City of Temecula: Administration Total $111,196.40 $556,445 If additional funds become available during the program year from unanticipated increases in appropriations, savings from completed projects or dropped projects, City staff will increase the funding of the Capital Improvement Activities included in the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. No substantial amendments will be required for such an action. 2. Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan Needs Assessment Overview HUD's Community Planning and Development (CPD) Outcome Performance Measurement Framework classifies objectives in three categories: decent housing, a suitable living environment, and economic opportunity. Based on the Needs Assessment and Market Analysis, the Strategic Plan within the Consolidated Plan identifies eleven high priority needs to be addressed through the implementation of activities aligned with nine Strategic Plan goals. The last two priority needs were included to achieve goals identified in the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH). The high priority needs and program objectives for the City of Temecula are: • Promote the development of affordable housing 2 • Preserve the existing housing stock • Ensure equal access to housing opportunities • Provide public services for low- and moderate -income residents • Provide public services for residents with special needs • Provide public services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness • Provide public services for seniors and veterans • Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure • Promote economic opportunity • AFH: Amend land use and zoning laws • AFH: Address inaccessibility needs The following nine goals are identified in the Strategic Plan: • Affordable housing development • Housing preservation • Fair housing services • Services for low- and moderate -income residents • Services for residents with special needs • Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness • Services to seniors and veterans • Public facilities and infrastructure improvements • Small business creation and expansion 3 Table 1- Strategic Plan Summary 5-year Goal 2021-2022 Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Outcome Outcome Indicator indicator 1. Affordable Housing Affordable Expand the supply 100 rental units 0 rental units Development Housing of affordable housing 2 Housing Affordable Preserve the 15 owner- 5 owner - Preservation Housing existing housing occupied units occupied units stock 3. Fair Housing Affordable Ensure equal 1,750 people 324 people Services Housing access to housing opportunities 4. Services for low- Public Provide public 600 people 61 people and moderate- Services services for low- income residents income residents 5. Services for Public Public services for 300 people 58 people residents with Services residents with special needs special needs 6. Services for the Homeless Prevent and 350 people 195 people homeless and eliminate those at risk of homelessness homelessness 7. Services to seniors Public Public services to 160 people 0 seniors and veterans Services seniors and veterans 8. Public Facilities and Non -Housing Neighborhood and 30,000 people 7,805 persons Infrastructure Community Infrastructure with disabilities Improvements Development Improvement 9. Small business Non -Housing Promote economic 24 businesses 5 businesses creation and Community opportunity expansion Development 3. Evaluation of past performance The investment of HUD resources during the first four program years under the current Five -Year Consolidated Plan was a catalyst for positive change in the community. Totals shown below do not reflect accomplishments for the current 2020-2021 program year, as the program year is not complete. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources allowed the City and its partners to: 4 • Provide fair housing services to 854 clients. • Include a new translation tool on City's website that can translate each page into 104 languages, including information regarding the CDBG Program and fair housing. • Complete sidewalk segments on Fourth Street and Old Town Front Street in Old Town, serving a low- and moderate -income area. • Complete an additional sidewalk segment on Ynez Road providing better transit connections to social services. • Complete the construction of a third sidewalk project along Mercedes Street. • Replace the boardwalks in Old Town. • Provide 154 underserved LMI youth with new clothing and school supplies through the Assistance League. • Assist eleven startup businesses through the Temecula Valley Entrepreneur's Exchange (TVEZ) incubator program and conduct 281 one-on-one consultations, resulting in twelve jobs created. • Complete seventeen housing rehabilitation projects through the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Improvement Program for a total of 38 housing units over the life of the program. • Acquire six computers and set up six workstations for the recently created City Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program and serve eleven homeless persons in the final two weeks of the Program Year 2017-2018 and another 23 homeless and at - risk of homelessness persons including 14 children in 2018-2019 and twenty households in the first part of Program Year 2019-2020. • Provide 127 homeless and underserved LMI individuals with emergency food through the Circle of Care food bank. • Provide services to 43 persons through Community Mission of Hope. • Provide health care services to 59 women through Michelle's Place. • Provide hospice care through Hospice of the Valleys for 71 elderly persons. • Provide recreational programs to 59 foster care children through the Kids of Summer Program. • Provided specially trained service and assistance dogs through the Canine Support Team for three persons with disabilities; • Provide a protection program for nine at -risk young people and assistance to 94 victims of domestic violence through SAFE. • Provide direct advocacy for sixteen foster children through the Voices for Children program. 5 • Provide before and after school care through the Boys and Girls Club for 24 low- income children. • Complete the preparation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan and budgeted its first two projects based on its recommendations. • Entitle deed -restricted, age -restricted units in the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment on December 20, 2017. • Conduct numerous homeless outreach days that provided case management, dental, medical, and job search services to individuals experiencing homelessness. • Adopt an accessory dwelling unit ordinance. • Complete the third phase of construction for Madera Vista, creating an additional 30 affordable housing units. • Complete the rehabilitation of the 55-unit Rancho California Apartments. • Approve a series of "Quality of Life" ordinances in October 2017, aimed at expanding the City's homeless outreach efforts. • In response to the City's Affordable Housing RFP for $12.4 million of Tax Allocation Bond (TAB) proceeds, select the first developer to enter into a Disposition and Development Agreement for the provisions of affordable housing. Sixty affordable housing units will be constructed as a result of that City contribution. The City is negotiating with a second developer for the construction of 77 rental units. The City continues to negotiate with other developers to utilize the remaining funds. • Work with Affirmed Housing to re-syndicate/rehabilitate Mission Village apartments. If successful, project completion is estimated by end of 2020. • Develop a community resource guide for those experiencing homelessness and at risk of homelessness. • Take a leadership role in a five -city regional homelessness alliance. • Promote economic development activity through programs such as: College and Vocational Fair, Future Physician Leaders, Global Citizens, Junior Women's STEM, Medical Scribe, Summer Foods Service Program, Leadership Academy, Summer Legal Scholars, Young Women's Career Conference, Youth Entrepreneurs and Youth Innovators. • Host an Outreach/In-Reach Event at the HELP center, which allowed a one -stop shop for homeless, at -risk for homeless and at -risk populations in general. It included an incentivized meal, haircuts, medical and dental services, DPSS, Housing Authority, phone distributer, rehab providers, workforce development and mental health providers. • Complete City's Limited English Plan N. While the City and its partners were able to successfully implement the activities listed above since July 2017, there are insufficient resources to fully address the level of need identified in the last Consolidated Plan. In June 2011, the State of California passed AB1X2 to eliminate Redevelopment Agencies —a substantial funding source for housing, community and economic development programs in California —significantly curtailed the City's ability to implement activities that benefit low- and moderate -income residents. 4. Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process The City adopted a revised Citizen Participation Plan on June 28, 2016 that reflects regulatory changes and process improvements. The revised Citizen Participation Plan addressed HUD regulations pertaining to the Assessment of Fair Housing requirements for a more robust citizen involvement process. During the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan preparation process, the City broadened its citizen participation through surveys, community meetings and public hearings. During the preparation of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan preparation process, the City made efforts to encourage the participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with disabilities. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data and assisted the Cityto ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid duplication of effort. This broadened process has continued with each Action Plan. On December 8, 2020, the City conducted two virtual technical workshops for agencies interested in applying for CDBG funds. On February 23, 2021, the City's Finance Committee conducted a public meeting to prepare a CDBG funding recommendation to the City Council. The City published a notice in the local newspaper, which has a general circulation within the City, that the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan is available for public review and comment. A public hearing was held on April 27, 2021. The stakeholders, who were notified for each hearing, are included in Section AP-10 of this Action Plan. S. Summary of public comments In the development of the Action Plan, the City solicited applications from City Departments, the local fair housing agency and the public services agencies. The draft Action Plan was available for public review and comment from March 28, 2021 to April 27, 2021. The City Council convened a public hearing on April 27, 2021 to receive comments on the Action Plan. A summary of public comments can be found in Table 5 and Appendix B. 7 6. Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting them There were no comments or views that were not accepted. 7. Summary The City continues to make tremendous progress in meeting the nine goals identified in the 2017- 2021 Consolidated Plan. The 2021-2022 Action Plan will address seven of the nine Strategic Plan Goals from the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan by allocating $556,445 of CDBG funds to projects and activities to be implemented from July 1, 2020 to June 30, 2021. The ninth goal is to expand the supply of affordable housing. The City Council approved a Disposition and Development Agreement with Pacific West Associates in June 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units. The agreement includes City land as well as tax allocation bond proceeds. The developer is currently applying for financing through the State of California. Construction is anticipated to begin in 2022. The City approved a Disposition and Development Agreement with Las Haciendas Housing, L.P., a development for the construction of 77 affordable rental units. Both developments are subject to receiving an allocation of tax credits from the State of California. The City is continuing negotiations with other developers to utilize the remaining Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. 0 The Process PR-05 Lead & Responsible Agencies 24 CFR 91.200(b) 1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and funding source The following is the agency responsible for preparing the Consolidated Plan and responsible for the administration of CDBG program. Table 2 — Responsible Agencies Agency Role Name Department/Agency CDBG Manager City of Temecula Community Development Department Narrative The Community Development Department is the lead department responsible for the administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with MDG Associates, Inc. to prepare the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and the 2021-2022 Action Plan. In the implementation of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual Action Plans, the Community Development Department shall be responsible for all grant planning, management and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD regulations and City policy. Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information Brandon Rabidou Senior Management Analyst City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 506-5142 brandon.rabidou(@TemeculaCA.L-ov Wl AP-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.200(b), 91.215(I) 1. Introduction In preparing the Consolidated Plan and the Assessment of Fair Housing, the City of Temecula consulted with representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and moderate -income residents, and the provision of services to children, seniors, persons with special needs, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons. The primary agencies, groups or organizations consulted can be found on the following pages. A comprehensive list of stakeholders is provided in Appendix B. The input received from these consultation partners helped establish the objectives and goals described in the Strategic Plan. Specific comments received from these organizations are included in Appendix B. To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following methods: • Stakeholder surveys (web -based and paper -surveys) • Individual stakeholder consultations • Community meetings • Public hearings • Receipt of written comments Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction's activities to enhance coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private and governmental health, mental health and service agencies (91.215(1)). The City recognizes the importance of coordination and alignment among various service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result, during the development of the Consolidated Plan, the City consulted closely with organizations that provide assisted and public housing, health services and other community -focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys including specific questions associated with coordination, invitations to community meetings and follow-up in -person interviews where appropriate. The City further recognized the importance of continued coordination and alignment during the preparation of the 2021-2022 Action Plan with these organizations and agencies. The City continues strengthening relationships and alignment among these organizations in the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds and through technical assistance provided to subrecipients of CDBG funds each year. The City monitors its affordable housing units every year to ensure compliance with State and Federal requirements, supports the Housing Authority's Section 8 program and participates in the County's Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC) program. 10 Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness The Continuum of Care of Riverside County (CoC) guides the development of homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness throughout the region. The CoC is comprised of a network of public, private, faith -based, for -profit and nonprofit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources in providing services for homeless persons. The County and its cities, including the City of Temecula, also provide resources for services that assist the homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. The nonprofit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County, including the City Departments, provide a variety of programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to the chronically homeless, homeless families with children as well as single men and women. The nonprofit and faith -based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with disabilities and unaccompanied youth. During the Five -Year Consolidated Planning process, the City provided a detailed questionnaire to the CoC to identify the CoC's perceived needs in the County and its objectives to address the needs of different homeless populations, specifically chronically homeless families and individuals, families with children, veterans, unaccompanied youth and persons at risk of homelessness. Following the delivery and response to this questionnaire, the City followed up with the CoC to clarify existing needs and objectives and understand opportunities for collaboration and coordination during the five-year planning process. Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding, policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS In the development of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula consulted 130 housing, social services and other entities involved in housing, community and economic development in Temecula and throughout the region. Through this process, the City obtained valuable information on priority needs and how resources should be invested to provide decent affordable housing, a suitable living environment and economic opportunities primarily for its low- and moderate -income residents. The CoC was consulted directly by telephone and emails to discuss performance standards, outcome, policies, and procedures for HMIS. The City was referred to the Ten -Year Plan to End Homelessness, the 2020 Point -in -Time Homeless Count and other publicly available reports. The City does not receive an allocation of Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds. 11 Table 3 includes a representative listing of the entities consulted as part of the consultation process. 2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations and others who participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations with housing, social service agencies and other entities Table 3 — Agencies, groups, organizations who participated 1 Agency/Group/Organization Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Inc. Agency/Group/Organization Type Service -Fair Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Public Services Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying fair housing needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 2 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing PHA What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Public Housing Needs AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying rental housing needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 3 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Housing Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 12 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? modifying their program within the City and understanding the housing rehab needs of City residents. 4 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Regional Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities Regional organization What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Homeless Special Needs AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying needs of outcomes of the consultation or areas for the special needs population and developing improved coordination? the programs and strategies. 5 Agency/Group/Organization State Council on Developmental Disabilities Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities Other Government -State What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Non -Homeless Special Needs AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying needs of outcomes of the consultation or areas for the special needs population and developing improved coordination? the programs and strategies 6 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Riverside Association of Realtors Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders Business and Civic Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? Market Analysis AFH AP 2021-2022 13 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying economic outcomes of the consultation or areas for development needs within the City and improved coordination? developing the market analysis and strategies. 7 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of the homeless and developing strategies to address those needs. 8 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Continuum of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of the homeless and developing strategies to address those needs. 9 Agency/Group/Organization Wells Fargo Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 14 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying business outcomes of the consultation or areas for needs within the City and developing the improved coordination? market analysis and strategies. 10 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Sheriff's Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -County What section of the Plan was addressed by Other: Crime Prevention Consultation? AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying existing crime prevention outcomes of the consultation or areas for programs and needs within the City and how improved coordination? the City is addressing the needs of the homeless and victims of domestic violence. 11 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Economic Development Agency Agency/Group/Organization Type Other Government -County What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Intergovernmental cooperation Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Information was used in consulted and what are the anticipated identifying needs of the business community outcomes of the consultation or areas for within the City and developing the market improved coordination? analysis and strategies. 12 Agency/Group/Organization Desert AIDS project Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with HIV/AIDS What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated needs of those with AIDS and developing outcomes of the consultation or areas for strategies to address those needs. improved coordination? 13 Agency/Group/Organization GRID Alternatives Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AP 2021-2022 15 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information used to develop local consulted and what are the anticipated housing rehab priorities. Notification of outcomes of the consultation or areas for 2021-2022 Action Plan preparation. improved coordination? 14 Agency/Group/Organization Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview and survey. Information was used consulted and what are the anticipated in identifying housing needs within the City outcomes of the consultation or areas for and developing the market analysis and improved coordination? strategies. 15 Agency/Group/Organization VA Loma Linda Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health Publicly Funded Institution/System of Care What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Veterans Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated needs of veterans within the City and outcomes of the consultation or areas for developing the market analysis and improved coordination? strategies. 16 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Empire Rescue Mission Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated needs of the homeless and developing outcomes of the consultation or areas for strategies to address those needs. improved coordination? 17 Agency/Group/Organization Western Riverside Council of Governments Agency/Group/Organization Type Regional organization Planning organization 16 What section of the Plan was addressed by Market Analysis Consultation? Other -regional planning AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey and coordination. Information was consulted and what are the anticipated used in identifying needs in the region and outcomes of the consultation or areas for developing strategies to address those needs. improved coordination? Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan preparation. 18 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Unified School District Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Education What section of the Plan was addressed by Economic Development Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used to identify consulted and what are the anticipated needs of especially persons with disabilities outcomes of the consultation or areas for and employment needs and to develop improved coordination? strategies to address those needs. 19 Agency/Group/Organization California Apartment Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing Housing Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used to identify the needs of outcomes of the consultation or areas for the renters and to understand what is improved coordination? happening in the local market to better develop strategies. 20 Agency/Group/Organization Court Appointed Special Advocate of Riverside County Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth Services What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of those in foster care within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 17 21 Agency/Group/Organization Hospice of the Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Seniors What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information on needs of seniors and consulted and what are the anticipated application guidance. outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 22 Agency/Group/Organization Autism Society Inland Empire Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying needs outcomes of the consultation or areas for persons with disabilities within the City and improved coordination? developing the market analysis and strategies. 23 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Office on Aging Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Elderly Persons What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated needs of the elderly within the City and outcomes of the consultation or areas for developing the market analysis and improved coordination? strategies. 24 Agency/Group/Organization League of Women Voters Agency/Group/Organization Type Civic leaders What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -community leaders Consultation? AFH How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying needs outcomes of the consultation or areas for within the City and developing the market improved coordination? analysis and strategies. 25 Agency/Group/Organization SMURF - Single Mothers United in Rewarding Fellowship Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children 18 What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Children services Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying childcare needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 26 Agency/Group/Organization Community Mission of Hope Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 27 Agency/Group/Organization Jamboree Housing Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview and survey. Information was used consulted and what are the anticipated in identifying housing needs within the City outcomes of the consultation or areas for and developing the market analysis and improved coordination? strategies. 28 Agency/Group/Organization VNW Circle of Care Agency/Group/Organization Type Services homeless 19 What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 29 Agency/Group/Organization Love of Christ Christian Fellowship Agency/Group/Organization Type Other -Religious Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying needs of outcomes of the consultation or areas for the Asian populations within the City and improved coordination? developing the market analysis and strategies. 30 Agency/Group/Organization SAFE Domestic Violence Services Program Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of those suffering domestic violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 31 Agency/Group/Organization Assistance League of Temecula Valley Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless needs -Families with Children Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 20 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 32 Agency/Group/Organization Path of Life Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies 33 Agency/Group/Organization Michelle's Place Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Health What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Health Services Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying women's health needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 34 Agency/Group/Organization Boys and Girls Club of SW County Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Recreational Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 21 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying recreational needs of children living in the target areas within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 35 Agency/Group/Organization Voices for Children Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Children Services -Victims Child Welfare Agency AFH AP 2021-2022 What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth - Consultation? How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of foster children within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 36 Agency/Group/Organization Canine Support Teams Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Persons with Disabilities What section of the Plan was addressed by Non -Homeless Special Needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying needs of persons with disabilities within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 37 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Police Department/County Sheriff's Department Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Crime Prevention Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 22 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying crime outcomes of the consultation or areas for prevention needs and the needs of the improved coordination? homeless and victims of domestic violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 38 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Community Services Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Services -Children Consultation? Services -Elderly Persons Services Person with Disabilities AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying recreational and socialization needs of the disabled population within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 39 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Public Works Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Public Works needs Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying infrastructure and public facility needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 40 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula Office of Economic Development Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Local What section of the Plan was addressed by Other -Community Development Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 23 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying economic development and microenterprise needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 41 Agency/Group/Organization Project Touch Agency/Group/Organization Type Services -Homeless What section of the Plan was addressed by Homeless Needs -Chronically homeless Consultation? Homeless Needs —Families with children Homelessness Needs —Veterans Homelessness Needs -Unaccompanied Youth AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan outcomes of the consultation or areas for preparation. Information was used in improved coordination? identifying homeless needs within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 42 Agency/Group/Organization U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development Agency/Group/Organization Type Other government -Federal What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Interview. Assistance was sought regarding consulted and what are the anticipated the fair housing assessment. outcomes of the consultation or areas for improved coordination? 43 Agency/Group/Organization Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula Agency/Group/Organization Type Religious - Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Economic Development Anti -poverty Minority populations AFH AP 2021-2022 24 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying Hispanic outcomes of the consultation or areas for needs within the City and developing the improved coordination? market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 44 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho en Espanol Agency/Group/Organization Type Religious - Minorities What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Need Assessment Consultation? Economic Development Anti -poverty Minority populations AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Consolidated Plan survey and interview. consulted and what are the anticipated Information was used in identifying Hispanic outcomes of the consultation or areas for needs within the City and developing the improved coordination? market analysis and strategies, identify AFH fair housing issues. 45 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 46 Agency/Group/Organization Rose Again Foundation Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Damacitas 25 47 Agency/Group/Organization Type Services —Victims of Domestic Violence Services -Victims What section of the Plan was addressed by Homelessness Needs -Families with Children Consultation? AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Notification of 2021-2022 Action Plan consulted and what are the anticipated preparation. Information was used in outcomes of the consultation or areas for identifying needs of those suffering domestic improved coordination? violence within the City and developing the market analysis and strategies. 48 Agency/Group/Organization Bridge Housing Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated housing needs within the City and developing outcomes of the consultation or areas for the market analysis and strategies. improved coordination? 49 Agency/Group/Organization Building Industry Association Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? AFH AP 2021-2022 How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated housing needs within the City and developing outcomes of the consultation or areas for the market analysis and strategies. improved coordination? 50 Agency/Group/Organization U.S. Vets Initiative Agency/Group/Organization Type Services — Veterans What section of the Plan was addressed by Housing Needs Assessment Consultation? Services - Homeless How was the Agency/Group/Organization Survey. Information was used in identifying consulted and what are the anticipated housing needs within the City and developing outcomes of the consultation or areas for the market analysis and strategies. improved coordination? 26 Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not consulting The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have expressed an interest in City's CDBG program and invited representatives from each entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were strongly encouraged to attend meetings and participate in surveys. There were no agency types that were not consulted. Any agency or organization that was not consulted and would like to be included in the City's list of stakeholders is encouraged to contact Brandon Rabidou in the Community Development Department at (951) 506-5142. Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when preparing the Plan Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your Strategic Plan overlap with the goals of each plan? Continuum of Care Continuum of Care of Riverside Strategic Plan goals are County consistent with Ten Year Strategy to End Homelessness 2014-2021 Housing Element City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are Update consistent with Housing Element policies and goals 2017-2021 Assessment of Fair City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are Housing consistent with Assessment of Fair Housing 2005 General Plan Update City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are consistent with the General Plan policies and goals 2030 Quality of Life City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are Management Plan (QLMP) consistent with the QLMP policies and goals Table 4 — Other local/regional/federal planning efforts Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities, including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(1)) In the development of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and the 2021-2022 Action Plan, the City afforded the following public entities with the opportunity to provide input on the Consolidated Plan. The City welcomes their input concerning the future implementation of project to address the Strategic Plan goals identified in section SP-45 of the Consolidated Plan: 27 • Housing Authority of the County of Riverside • Regional Homeless Alliance • Riverside County Continuum of Care • Riverside County Department of Social Services • Riverside County Office on Aging • Riverside County Economic Development Agency • Riverside County Health Department • Riverside County Veterans Services • Riverside County Behavioral Health Department • Riverside County Sheriff's Department • Riverside Transit Agency • Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) • Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) • State of California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resource Protection • State of California Department of Housing and Community Development • State of California Department of Employment Development Department • State of California Council on Developmental Disabilities • Southwest Workforce Development Center • Inland Regional Center • U.S. Veterans Administration • Temecula Valley Unified School District • Mt. St. Jacinto College • City of Murrieta • Federal Emergency Management Administration • Charter Communications • Federal Communications Commission 28 AP-12 Citizen Participation 1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden citizen participation Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal -setting On June 28, 2016, the City adopted a revised Citizen Participation Plan to significantly expand community outreach efforts in the development of the Consolidated Plan. Through this process and the preparation of the Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), the City doubled the number of stakeholder organizations from its previous consolidated planning process to promote broader citizen participation. The City provided outreach via electronic media in accordance with its Citizen Participation Plan and made public notices, surveys and other planning documents accessible to residents with limited English proficiency. To solicit and encourage participation in the identification of community needs and Strategic Plan goals, two surveys were conducted in the preparation of the AFH and Consolidated Plan. One survey was for residents of Temecula and the other was for stakeholder organizations serving Temecula residents as well as those stakeholders addressing regional needs. The resident survey was available on the City webpage and advertised in the San Diego Union Tribune, a media of general circulation in Temecula. The survey was distributed in City Hall at the front counter and permit center. Paper copies of the survey were provided for distribution to Temecula Pantry, Regional Homeless Alliance, and community churches whose congregations are comprised of mostly minority populations. On December 8, 2020, two virtual community workshops, convened to discuss housing, community and economic development needs and priorities along with request for funding requirements for Temecula. These workshops were interactive, with discussion of a variety of needs. A concerted effort was made to reach out to nonprofit organizations through the community workshops and consultations with area nonprofits and other organizations serving Temecula residents. On February 23, 2021, the City of Temecula Finance Subcommittee conducted a public meeting to consider the CDBG funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The Finance Subcommittee performs in an advisory capacity to City staff and to the City Council concerning planning, implementing, and assessing CDBG programs and activities. After reviewing all submitted applications, the Finance Committee made their funding recommendation. On March 28, 2021, the City published a notice in the San Diego Union Tribune providing the public a 30-day notice to review and comment on the draft 2021-2022 Action Plan. On April 27, 2021, the City Council considered public testimony regarding the Action Plan and authorized its submission to HUD. 29 Table 5 — Citizen Participation Outreach Sort Mode of Target of Summary of response / attendance Summary of Summary of URL Order Outreach Outreach comments received comments not (If applicable) accepted and reasons 1 City Fair Housing Minorities The AFH Fair Housing and 2017- 100 Temecula All comments were Not and 2017-2021 Persons with 2021 Consolidated Plan Needs residents and accepted and applicable. Consolidated Disabilities Assessment Survey for residents stakeholders incorporated into the Plan Needs was disseminated on paper and in responded to the survey results and Assessment Non -English electronic form in English and in survey. The survey included in the Residents' and Speaking - Specify Spanish to advise the City on the its was available from Assessment of Fair Stakeholder other language: fair housing and highest priority June through August Housing. Surveys Spanish housing, community and economic 2016. development needs in Temecula. Non -targeted/ broad community 2 Newspaper Ad Minorities Newspaper ads were published on The purpose was to All questions were Not November 27, 2020 in the San explain the revised answered; all applicable. Persons with Diego Union Tribune announcing application process comments accepted. disabilities two Community Workshops to and to answer receive input on the preparation of questions. Non -targeted/ the City's 2021-2022 Action Plan. broad community Residents of Public and Assisted Housing 3 Internet Non -targeted/ Notice posted on City website, City The purpose was to All questions were temeculaca.gov Outreach broad community Hall, and Library inviting residents explain the revised answered; all to the community workshops at application process comments accepted. City Hall on November 27, 2020. and to answer questions. 30 Sort Order Mode of Outreach Target of Outreach Summary of response / attendance Summary of comments received Summary of comments not accepted and reasons URL (if applicable) 4 Community Minorities Stakeholders attended two virtual Residents and All comments were Not Workshops Community Workshops held in the stakeholders accepted. applicable. Non -English morning and evening on December participated in a Speaking - Specify 8, 2020 via zoom (due to COVID-19 presentation other language: social distancing practices). concerning the Spanish Consolidated Plan and Action Plan. A Persons with facilitated discussion disabilities of community needs followed the Residents of presentation. Public and Assisted Housing 5 Public Hearing Non -targeted/ A public hearing was held before Representatives All comments were Not broad community the City Finance Subcommittee on from 8 service considered prior to applicable. February 23, 2021 at 4:30 p.m. to providers were the Subcommittee receive a presentation concerning available to speak making their the Consolidated Plan and about their recommendation. community needs. Persons proposed projects representing nonprofits and City and available to employees were available to answer questions. answer questions about City projects. 31 Sort Mode of Target of Summary of response / attendance Summary of Summary of URL Order Outreach Outreach comments received comments not (if applicable) accepted and reasons 6 Newspaper Ad Minorities Notice of the 30-day public review temeculaca.go v CDBG Persons with and comment period for the draft Disabilities 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan was published in the San Diego Union Non -English Tribune. The public notice invited Speaking - Specify interested residents to review the other language: draft document and to provide Spanish written comments at the City of Temecula Community Development Non -targeted/ Department, City of Temecula City broad community Clerk's Office, or online at the CDBG website. Due to the Corid-19 virus epidemic, residents were invited to participate through a virtual public hearing to provide oral comments before the Temecula City Council on April 27, 2021 at 7:00 p.m. 7 Public Hearing Non- Public hearing for the draft 2021- Not targeted/broad 2022 Annual Action Plan was held applicable. community before the Temecula City Council on April 27, 2021. 32 AP-15 Expected Resources — 91.220(c)(1,2) Introduction The projects and activities included in this Action Plan are based on resources that are reasonably anticipated to be available to the City from federal, state, local and private sources for the period of July 1, 2021 through June 30, 2022. The actual resources available to support activities during the implementation of the remainder of the Consolidated Plan may vary significantly due to factors outside of the City's control. For example, HUD formula grant allocations are subject to change each year based on a number of factors, such as the amount of the national appropriation, changes in ACS population data applied to the CPD grant formulas, statutory changes to the CPD grant formulas, the addition or removal of entitlements receiving a particular CPD grant and the availability of reallocated funds. Additionally, state, local and private resources will vary significantly depending on economic conditions. For Program Year 2021-2022, the City will receive $555,982 of CDBG funds from HUD. Coupled with an availability of $463 from previously closed out programs, the City will have a total of $556,445 to spend during program year 2021-2022. If additional funds become available during the program year from unanticipated increases in appropriations, savings from completed projects or dropped projects, City staff will increase the funding of the Capital Improvement Activities included in the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan. No substantial amendments will be required for such an action. 33 Table 6 - Expected Resources — Priority Table Program Source of Funds Uses of Funds Expected Amount Available Year 5 Expected Amount Available Narrative Description Annual Program Prior Year Total: Allocation: $ Income: $ Resources: $ $ Reminder of Con Plan $ CDBG Public- Admin and Planning Based on level federal Economic funding in Development $555,982 $0 $463 $556,445 $2,750,000 subsequent Housing years Public Improvements Public Services Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private, state and local funds), including a description of how matching requirements will be satisfied To address housing and community development needs in Temecula, the City will leverage its CDBG entitlement grant with a variety of funding resources in order to maximize the effectiveness of available funds. The City's former Redevelopment Agency was the primary non-federal source of leveraged funds. With the elimination of the City's Redevelopment Agency, the City's ability to leverage federal funds has been substantially reduced. The City and its development partners will continue to seek new opportunities to leverage federal funds, such as the Low -Income Tax Credit program and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Section 202 and 811 for the Elderly Program. In addition, the City will leverage federal, state and private funds in investing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds in creating affordable housing opportunities for its low- and moderate -income residents. The City has selected its first developer to utilize these funds in the construction of 60 units of affordable housing (Vine Creek Apartments). The project is subject to the developer receiving tax credits. In addition, the City has approved another Development Agreement with another developer for the construction of another tax credit project, which will provide an additional 77 affordable units. Federal Resources • Continuum of Care (CoQ Program • HUD Veterans Affairs Supportive Housing (HUD-VASH 34 • Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202) • Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811) • Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) • Youthbuild • Federal Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program State Resources • State Low -Income Housing Tax Credit Program • Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN) • CalHome Program • Multifamily Housing Program (MHP) • Housing Related Parks Grant • CaIHFA Single and Multi -Family Program • Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding Local Resources • Riverside County CoC • Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARIVCO) • Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA) • Local Tax Allocation Bond proceeds • City Measure S funds Private Resources • Federal Home Loan Bank Affordable Housing Program (AHP) • Community Reinvestment Act Programs • United Way Funding • Private Contributions If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan On February 1, 2012, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and preservation of affordable housing. This negatively affected affordable housing and residential investment. While there are mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, the available resources for affordable housing are scarce. The City has selected two developers that will receive a portion of the $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds to construct affordable housing in the City for low- and moderate -income 35 persons. Any land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. The City has approved the construction of 137 affordable housing units (Vine Creek and Las Haciendas), 21 of which are set aside for persons with disabilities. In addition, the City adopted of an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance as an incentive for the construction of affordable housing by the private sector. Discussion The City issued a request for proposals (RFP) for the development of affordable housing with the City's Tax Allocation Bond proceeds ($12.4 million), which could include more than one site, some of which are located east of 1-15. The City received twenty proposals from thirteen interested developers. The City has selected the first development to utilize these funds, negotiating with a second developer and working with other developers utilizing the remaining funds. In addition, the City is negotiating with a second developer for the construction of additional rental units. Both projects are subject to receiving tax credit allocations. Implementation of the approved proposals will likely take place during the final years of the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan. Based on prior project experience, it is anticipated that these funds will leverage other public and private funding, including but not limited to: o Low -Income Housing Tax Credits o Project -based Section 8 certificates o Project financing at favorable interest rates from local lenders o Private market real estate investments o Market rate housing that subsidizes affordable units on the same site o City -owned properties Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend CDBG funds on community development, public facilities, housing preservation, infrastructure and public services activities that promote a suitable living environment between July 2017 and June 2022. 36 AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives Sort Start Geographic Goal Name End Year Category Needs Addressed Funding Goal Outcome Indicator Order Year Area CDBG: Rental Housing CDBG/AFH: Affordable Affordable Promote the $0 Constructed in 2021: 0 1 2021 2022 Citywide development of Housing Development Housing Local Funds: rental units affordable housing $12.4 million Homeowner Housing CDBG/AFH: Housing Affordable Preserve the existing CDBG: Rehabilitated: 2 Preservation 2021 2022 Housing Citywide housing stock $50,000 5 Household Housing Units Other: 324 Other Ensure equal access Other: Fair housing CDBG/AFH: Fair Affordable CDBG: 3 Housing Services 2021 2022 Housing Citywide to housing $22,500 workshop for housing opportunities industry and 1 training for homeless providers CDBG: Services for low- Provide public Public CDBG: Public service activities: 4 and moderate -income 2021 2022 Services Citywide services for low - $20,448 58 Persons Assisted residents income residents CDBG: Services for Provide public Public CDBG: Public service: 61 5 Residents with Special 2021 2022 Services Citywide services for residents $13,632 Persons Assisted Needs with special needs Provide public CDBG: Services for the services to the CDBG: Public service activities: 6 homeless and at risk of 2021 2022 Homeless Citywide homeless and those $26,817.30 195 Persons Assisted homelessness at risk of homelessness Provide public CDBG: Services to Seniors and CDBG: Public service activities: 7 2021 2022 Citywide Services to Seniors Seniors and Veterans Veterans 0 0 Persons Assisted and Veterans CDBG/AFH: Public Improve Facilities and Non -Housing CDBG Neighborhood, public CDBG: Public Facility or 8 Infrastructure 2021 2022 Community Target facilities and $311,851.30 Infrastructure Activities: Development Areas 7,805 Persons Assisted Improvements Infrastructure 37 9 Small business creation and expansion 2020 2020 Non -Housing Community Development Citywide Promote Economic Opportunity CDBG: $0 Other: 0 businesses Other: Adopted Affordable Housing Overlay; Density AFH: Amend land use and Affordable Promote the CDBG: Bonus Ordinance on 10 Zoning 2017 2019 Housing Citywide development of $0 September 25, 2018; affordable housing Implementation of 2017 California Housing Package Non -Homeless Address accessibility CDBG: Other: Adopted and 11 AFH: Inaccessibility 2017 2019 Special Needs Citywide issues $0 Implementing Transition Plan Table 7 — Goals Summary 38 Goal Descriptions 1 Goal Name Affordable Housing Development Goal In partnership with housing developers, leverage tax allocation bond proceeds in Description support of the development of new housing units affordable to households earning less than 30, 60 or 80 percent of Area Median Income. CDBG funds would not be used to address this goal. Marketing plans will be required that will include affirmative outreach methods targeted to protected class individuals including Hispanic and Native American households as well as households that include persons with disabilities. This goal addresses AFH Goal #2 "to increase and preserve affordable units for renters and homeowners." The City has awarded funds for the construction 137 affordable housing development utilizing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. The goal is to construct at least 100 additional units of affordable housing. Due to the complexity of assembling financing packages, construction and developing marketing plans will occur in a future year. 2 Goal Name Affordable Housing Preservation Goal Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low - Description and moderate -income households. This goal also addresses AFH Goal #2 "to increase and preserve affordable units for renters and homeowners." The City will provide CDBG funds to Habitat for Humanity to address critical housing maintenance and repair issues of at least five houses occupied by at lower income households. The rehabilitation of the Rancho California Apartments was completed in March 2018, extending the affordability of 55 affordable units. Solar panels were installed on all 103 units in the Madera Vista apartment complex in November 2018. 3 Goal Name Fair Housing Services Goal This goal also addresses AFH Goal #4 to provide equal housing opportunities for Description protected classes. In 2021-2022, the City will be providing 27% of its public service funds from CDBG to a fair housing service provider to provide outreach, education and assistance enforcing fair housing laws — particularly those protecting the rights of disabled residents. Throughout the year, the City will provide fair housing information on its webpage and distribute fair housing material at City facilities. The City website has a Google Translate tool, which can translate information about fair housing and the CDBG program into 104 languages. 39 4 Goal Name Services for low- and moderate -income residents Goal Provide low and moderate -income persons with appropriate health, fitness, Description recreational, educational and other services including, but not limited to, childcare, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the well-being of low- and moderate -income families. 5 Goal Name Services for Residents with Special Needs Goal Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not Description limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities, domestic violence, substance abuse, foster care and HIV/AIDS. 6 Goal Name Homelessness Prevention Services Goal Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate Description homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the homeless and those at -risk of homelessness, including homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. 7 Goal Name Services to Seniors and Veterans Goal Provide seniors and veterans with appropriate supportive services, including, but Description not limited to, those related to health, fitness, recreational and educational services. 8 Goal Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Goal Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and Description moderate -income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be low - and moderate -income such as the elderly and disabled adults. This goal also addresses AFH Goal #3 "to provide greater access to public facilities and improvements for persons with disabilities." During the 2017-18 program year, the City developed its ADA Transition Plan that has evaluated public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. The assessment included city parks, trail systems, tennis/basketball courts, swimming pools, public facilities, fire stations, signalized intersections, bus stops and roadways with ADA ramps. Each year, the City will be addressing one or more of the needs identified in the ADA Transition Plan with CDBG funds. 9 Goal Name Small business creation and expansion Goal The City will not be addressing this goal with CDBG funds. Instead, the City will Description fund the TVE3 incubator program with its other resources. 40 10 Goal Name AFH: Land use and zoning laws Goal This goal addresses AFH Goal #1, by amending the Zoning Code to promote the Description development of affordable housing. The City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ) Program by amending Title 17 of the Municipal Code (Zoning Code) to accommodate Temecula's regional housing need for 2,007 affordable units for lower income households. The City established an AHOZ on at least 100 acres. After the establishment of the AHOZ, sites identified will require: 1) minimum densities of 20 units per acre; 2) 50% of need (1,003 units) will be on sites allowing exclusively residential uses; 3) multi -family uses at the densities established under the AHO will be allowed by right, without a conditional use permit. 11 Goal Name AFH: Address Inaccessibility Goal This goal addresses AFH Goal #3 "to provide greater access to public facilities and Description improvements for persons with disabilities." To accomplish this goal, the City has prepared the ADA Transition Plan, which evaluated public facilities to ensure equal access for persons with disabilities. Initiated in program year 2018-2019, the City will address at least one accessibility deficiency each year with CDBG funds, which was identified in the City's ADA Transition Plan. In Program Year 2021-2022, the City will address ADA access needs at the Mary Phillips Senior Center. AP-35 Projects — 91.220(d) Introduction To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan to the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula will invest CDBG funds in projects that preserve affordable housing; provide fair housing services; provide services to low- and moderate -income residents; provide services to seniors, veterans and residents with special needs; prevent homelessness; improve public facilities and infrastructure; and facilitate the creation or expansion of small businesses. Together, these projects will address the housing, community and economic development needs of Temecula residents, particularly those residents residing in the low- and moderate -income CDBG Target Areas. Two AFH activities, the adoption of the Affordable Housing Overlay and the ADA Transition Plan, were not included among the following projects, because the City used other funding sources to accomplish these goals. They are discussed in more detail in the Sections AP-20, SP-25 and the AFH. The final AFH activity is the utilization of the Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds. The City has selected two developments to utilize these funds, which will result in construction of 137 affordable units. Both are subject to receiving tax credits from the State of California. The City is continuing negotiations with other developers in utilizing the remaining funds. 41 # Project Name 1 Affordable Housing Development 2 Housing Preservation 3 Fair Housing Services 4 Services for Low- and Moderate -Income Residents 5 Services for Residents with Special Needs 6 Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness 7 Services to Seniors and Veterans 8 Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements 9 Small Business Creation and Expansion 10 Program Administration Table 8 — Project Information 42 Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to addressing underserved needs Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG investments for program year 2021-2022 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. The City's CDBG investments in public facilities and infrastructure improvements activities are directed toward addressing the needs of persons with disabilities. For that reason, the program is not limited to CDBG target areas. The housing and public services activities will also be primarily benefiting low- and moderate -income limited clientele on a citywide basis to better address the needs of the underserved. The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, the high cost of housing, and the lack of availability of home improvement financing in the private lending industry. To address these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2021-2022 Action Plan in projects that provide grants to low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements; and projects that provide public and neighborhood services to seniors, veterans, persons in foster care, the homeless and other low- and moderate -income people and those with special needs. To address its housing needs, the City has entitled the construction of 137 units of affordable housing with the $12.4 million Tax Allocation Bond proceed funds. Both developers are subject to receiving tax credits. Securing funding commitments such as tax credits continues to be a lengthy process and the completion of the construction will most likely occur in the later years of the five-year Consolidated Plan cycle. The City continues to work with other developers in utilizing the remaining bond proceeds. 43 AP-38 Project Summary Table 9 — Project Summary Information 1 Project Name Affordable Housing Preservation Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Housing Preservation Needs Addressed Preserve the supply of affordable housing Funding CDBG: $50,000 Description Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock occupied by low- and moderate -income households through the implementation of the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program. Also addresses AFH Goal #2 to increase and preserve affordable units for renters and homeowners. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number Approximately 5 low- and moderate -income households will benefit and type of families that from the proposed activities. will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Habitat for Humanity - Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program (5 households) CDBG: $50,000 44 2 Project Name Fair Housing Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Fair Housing Services Needs Addressed Ensure equal access to housing opportunities Funding CDBG: $22,500 Description Affirmatively further fair housing choice through the provision of fair housing education, counseling, anti -discrimination and landlord - tenant mediation services. Also addresses AFH Goal #4 to provide equal housing opportunities for protected classes. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and Approximately 324 low and moderate -income people will benefit type of families that will from the proposed activity. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Fair Housing Council of Riverside County (324 people) CDBG: $22,500 45 3 Project Name Services for Low- and Moderate -Income Residents Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services for low- and moderate -income residents Needs Addressed Provide public services for low-income residents Funding CDBG: $13,632 Description Provide women with health services and youth with appropriate health, fitness, recreational, educational and other services to support the emotional and developmental well-being of children and youth from low- and moderate -income families. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and Approximately 61 low- and moderate -income people will benefit type of families that will from the proposed activities. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Assistance League of Temecula Valley (54 children) CDBG: $6,816 Boys and Girls Club (7 children) CDBG: $6,816 46 4 Project Name Services for Residents with Special Needs Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services for Residents with Special Needs Needs Addressed Public services for residents with special needs Funding CDBG: $20,448 Description Provide special needs services including, but not limited, to those who are persons with disabilities and victims of domestic violence. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and Approximately 45 special needs and low and moderate -income type of families that will people will benefit from the proposed activities. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities SAFE Alternatives for Everyone (40 persons) CDBG:$6,816 Voices for Children (CASA) (6 children) CDBG: $6,816 Riverside County Rape Crisis Center (12 persons): $6,816 47 5 Project Name Homelessness Prevention Services Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Services to the Homeless and Those at Risk of Homelessness Needs Addressed Provide public services to the homeless and those at risk of homelessness Funding CDBG: $26,817.30 Description Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate homelessness including, but not limited to, homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and Approximately 118 homeless or at -risk of homelessness people will type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities. benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program (60 persons) $20,001.30 Community Mission of Hope (135 persons) $6,816 m 6 Project Name Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Target Area Citywide Goals Supported Public Facilities and Infrastructure Improvements Needs Addressed Improve Neighborhoods, Public Facilities and Infrastructure Funding CDBG: $311,851.30 Description Remove architectural barriers in City of Temecula public improvements and facilities to benefit those with disabilities presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate -income. Target Date 9/30/2022 Estimate the number and 7,805 disabled residents in the City will benefit from the 2021-2022 type of families that will CDBG removal of architectural barrier activities. Also addresses AFH Goal #3 to provide greater access to public facilities and benefit from the improvements for persons with disabilities. proposed activities Location Description Citywide Planned Activities Mary Phillips Senior Center Rehabilitation (7,805 persons): $311,851.30 7 Project Name Program Administration Target Area Citywide Goals Supported All Needs Addressed All Funding CDBG: $111,196.40 Description This project provides for the administration of the CDBG programs. Target Date 6/30/2022 Estimate the number and Not applicable. type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities Location Description Not applicable. Planned Activities City of Temecula: CDBG Administration $111,196.40 49 AP-50 Geographic Distribution — 91.220(f) Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed The City of Temecula is located along Interstate 15 (1-15) in southwestern Riverside County, just north of the San Diego County line. Based on the 2019 State Department of Finance population estimates, the population of Temecula is 111,970. The City has undergone a 0.08 percent increase in population between January 1, 2019 and January 1, 2020. The population of Temecula is a multi -culturally diverse community. Hispanics of any race are the largest ethnic or racial group, comprising about 25 percent of the population, along with Asians (9.8%) and African Americans (4.1%). According to the State Department of Finance, the City had 36,550 housing units in 2020. Of these, 5.6% were vacant. In 2010, almost a quarter (24.6%) of the population in Temecula fell into the lower (extremely low, very low, and low) income category. This is not likely to have changed appreciably, although data is unavailable to substantiate that. In 2010, the unemployment rate was 10.8 percent. In 2020, the unemployment rate had increased to 6.9 percent, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (this increase was attributed to the COVID-19 global pandemic). In 2020, 82 percent of the households are single family attached and detached housing units. The average household size 3.24 persons per unit, up from 3.15 in 2010. The City of Temecula will use CDBG funds to address the needs of the 7,805 persons with disabilities in the City by removing architectural barriers in City -owned public improvements and facilities. This will be done by addressing the ADA components and rehabilitation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center and the recommendations identified in the City's Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan for this designated location. In accordance with the AFH goals, affordable housing provided by the Affordable Housing Tax Allocation Bond Proceeds will be developed outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty. The same goal will be achieved by the Affordable Housing Overlay Zone. The City of Temecula is an exception community underthe CDBG Program with onlythree census tracts where at least 51 percent of the residents are of low and moderate income. These scattered tracts (CT 512, 432, 496) are located where there are existing apartment complexes. See Appendix D for a map identifying census tracts with greatest number of low- and moderate - income person. According to the adopted Assessment of Fair Housing, the City remains a diverse and integrated community with no significant concentrations of minorities. The City has no 50 Racially or Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAPs) and that the City's dissimilarity index score and mapping all indicate a highly integrated community. Table 10 - Geographic Distribution Target Area Percentage of Funds CDBG Target Area 0% Citywide 100% Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically The City's primary method of allocating CDBG dollars is to assist low- to moderate -income areas and special needs populations. While 100% of the funds will be used to address the needs of lower income persons, none of the 2021-2022 Program Year funds will be used exclusively in eligible target areas, because the City will be addressing ADA needs in accordance with the AFH. For affordable housing, the City's resources will be allocated in areas where affordable housing is lacking and/or infill areas can accommodate affordable housing, when feasible. During Program Year 5, the City is allocating resources to those activities/programs defined as high priority pursuant to those established within the Consolidated Plan. Activities listed as high priority include housing rehabilitation; facility and infrastructure improvements including accessibility upgrades; and a provision of services including childcare, clothing, food, fair housing, shelter, health care, victims of domestic violence, assistance to persons with disabilities and other social services and economic development. As mentioned in the City's Strategic Plan, the greatest obstacle to meeting underserved needs is lack of funding. The City has many needs that exceed available funding, including infrastructure maintenance and repair, housing and services to special needs populations, comprehensive housing and services to assist persons who are chronically homeless move into supportive housing environments and provision of affordable housing. Both private foundations and public agencies have limited resources available to address social, community, and economic development goals pale in comparison to the recognized needs. For example, the City was able to fund only about 72 percent of the public service requests received from non-profit and government agencies this fiscal year. The City strongly encourages its subrecipients to seek other resources, to forge new partnerships, and to leverage additional funding whenever possible from local, State, Federal, and private sources. The City urges CDBG- funded programs and services to be flexible, while at the same time to be as efficient and effective as possible to achieve expected performance outcomes. 51 Discussion Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG funds for program year 2021-2022 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate - income people. The City does not have any Neighborhood Strategy Areas. 52 AP-55 Affordable Housing — 91.22O(g) Two high priority affordable housing needs are identified in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan and one Strategic Plan goal is established to provide the framework necessary to invest CDBG funds to address the affordable housing needs of the City. Expand the Supply of Affordable Housing Based on evaluation of 2009-2013 ACS and CHAS data, there is a high need for housing units affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Of the 8,625 households earning 0-80 percent of AMI in the City, 7,025 are cost -burdened households —meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing. Additionally, 5,175 of the cost - burdened households are considered severely cost -burdened households —meaning that they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Of the 5,175 severely cost -burdened households, 2,895 are rental households and 2,280 are owner -occupied households. Of those severely cost -burdened renter households, 2,025 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless. To address the need for affordable housing, the City has approved the entitlement of 137 units of affordable housing utilizing Tax Allocation Bond proceed and will continue negotiating with other developers for the remaining bond proceed funds. Because both projects are dependent upon receiving an allocation of tax credit funds from the State, it is not likely that the units will be constructed and occupied within the 2021-2022 Program Year. Preserve the Supply of Affordable Housing As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain safe and habitable. The situation is of particular concern for low- and moderate -income homeowners who may not be in a financial position to maintain their homes. The age and condition of Temecula's housing stock is an important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing systems. Housing over 15 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air- conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish plumbing fixtures. According to HUD's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data showing the year that housing units were built categorized by owner and renter tenure, the breakdown is as follows: 53 Age of Housing Stock Built prior to 1980 Built between 1980-1999 Total Number Percent Number Percent 20,734 1,538 7.42% 11,954 57.65% 10,634 844 7.94% 6,078 57.16% Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units occupied by low - and moderate -income households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low- and moderate -income households in the community. Addressing substandard housing conditions through housing preservation activities by providing CDBG funds to Habitat for Humanity provide that all economic segments of the community have the means to ensure that their property meets local standards and that all Temecula residents have the opportunity to live in decent housing. One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported Homeless 0 Non -Homeless 5 Special -Needs 0 Total 5 Table 11- One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through Rental Assistance 0 The Production of New Units 0 Rehab of Existing Units 5 Acquisition of Existing Units 0 Total 5 Table 12 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type Discussion The Strategic Plan identifies a high priority need to expand the supply of affordable housing and a high priority need to preserve the supply of affordable housing. During the 2021-2022 program year, the City of Temecula will invest CDBG funds in the preservation of affordable housing units. Specifically, CDBG funds will be used to support affordable housing preservation projects including the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance & Repairs Program. A number of developer proposals to construct affordable housing were under consideration utilizing $12.4 million in Tax Allocation Bond proceeds. The City has approved the construction of two developments utilizing these funds and continues to negotiate with other developers in constructing and/or rehabilitating additional affordable housing projects. Due to the length of 54 time to receive tax credit funding commitments, no new housing units are expected to be completed in 2021-2022. The City has approved Affirmed Housing proposal to re -syndicate and rehabilitate the 76-unit Mission Village apartments to preserve affordable housing in the City. Rehabilitation is to was completed in 2020. 55 AP-60 Public Housing — 91.220(h) Introduction There are no public housing developments in Temecula. All public housing programs consist of housing choice and project -based vouchers administered by the Housing Authority of the County of Riverside (HACK). The data presented in the tables below is for HACR and the narrative responses address the needs for the entire County. Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public housing There are no public housing developments or units planned for the City of Temecula in the next year. HACR will continue to actively support and assist Temecula residents with Housing Choice Vouchers. Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved in management and participate in homeownership HACR maintains active resident councils at all public housing developments and includes resident members on its Board of Directors. HACR constantly seeks feedback from residents on improvements and planning documents to ensure activities are meeting the needs of residents. HACR maintains a home ownership program for current public housing tenants through its Homeownership Program. HACR also links its Homeownership Program with its Family Self - Sufficiency Program to help households save money for a down payment through an escrow account. If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which financial assistance will be provided or other assistance Not applicable. HACR is designated as a High Performing PHA. Discussion According to the Housing Authority, there are 107 households receiving tenant -based Section 8 vouchers and fifteen project -based Section 8 vouchers in Temecula, including eight recently awarded to Mission Village Il. 56 AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities — 91.220(i) Introduction The City will invest CDBG funds during the 2021-2022 program year to address high priority needs identified in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan including preventing homelessness and providing public services to special needs populations including victims of domestic violence. Homelessness Prevention Services According to the results of the most recent data available from the bi-annual Point -in -Time Homeless Count (PIT Count) held on January 29, 2020, on any given night, approximately 2,884 people are homeless in Riverside County, which was a 2.6 percent increase over 2019. (The results of the 2021 PIT have not been released yet.) This increase can be attributed to several factors including an increase in the efficiency through mobile web -based technology; revision in the survey question; planned targeting of encampments; and an increase in the number of volunteers. According to the 2020 PIT, there were 59 homeless persons in Temecula, which was a 0.0 percent change over the previous year's count. The other cities in Southwest Riverside County experienced similar decreases, unlike the increasing trends elsewhere in the county. To address incidences of homelessness in Temecula and to prevent extremely low-income Temecula families from becoming homeless, the City places a high priority on programs that work to prevent homelessness or rapidly connect homeless individuals with housing and supportive services. To address this need, the City will support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate homelessness including, but not limited to, homelessness prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing. Using CDBG funds, the City will invest in homelessness prevention services by funding City's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program. Sixty persons are expected to benefit from this service. Community Mission of Hope is expected to assist an additional 135 persons who are homeless or at -risk of homelessness with housing and food. Those who will be addressed by these programs may include the chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth along with low-income individuals and families seeking to avoid homelessness. Services for Residents with Special Needs Analysis of available data and consultation with organizations providing services for special needs populations revealed a high need for a range of additional services including, but not limited to, those concerned with domestic violence. To address these needs, the City will support one activity that provides services to victims of domestic violence. The SAFE Alternatives for Everyone 57 Program will provide approximately 40 Temecula residents with counseling and support services to help victims of domestic violence and child abuse. Riverside County Rape Crisis Center will assist 12 persons who have experienced domestic violence. Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs To reach out to unsheltered homeless persons and assess their individual needs to connect them with available emergency shelter and transitional housing resources, the City of Temecula created the Responsible Compassion for the Homeless Program on June 11, 2015. The program is comprised of one sergeant and four (4) full-time Riverside County Housing Outreach Team (HOT) officers specially trained in working with homeless -related problems and knowledgeable about local and regional resources. They provide referrals to local service providers to address the homeless person's needs. The City's CDBG-funded homeless prevention and diversion program and Community Mission of Hope will assist 135 individuals experiencing or at risk of homelessness. The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier, the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. Through the City's Homeless Prevention and Diversion Program (HPDP) and the assistance from the Community Mission of Hope (CMOH), the City will be assisting the 135 homeless persons and persons at -risk of homelessness in Program Year 2021-2022. The City's HPD Program was awarded CDBG funds to make payments for the following short-term financial assistance: Rent, mortgage payment, security deposits and utility payments. Assistance will be on a one-time basis for at most three successive months. The CMOH program will provide case management for homeless individuals in obtaining permanent housing. Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of homeless persons The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier, the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance and housing counseling to low- and moderate -income residents to prevent homelessness. The City is using CDBG funds for the City's HPDP Program and CMOH to connect individuals and families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness with services and financial assistance to help them retain or return to housing and provide food to those in need. 58 Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period of time that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from becoming homeless again The City's HPDP Program will connect individuals and families that are homeless or at risk of homelessness with services and financial assistance to help them retain or return to housing. CMOH will provide additional support to those who are homeless and are at risk of homelessness. The HPDP program will work closely with the City's Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) officers, who have been connecting chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth with available resources through the Riverside County CoC, which is comprised of a network of public, private, faith -based, for - profit, and non-profit service providers who utilize several federal, state and local resources to provide services for homeless people. The goal is to help unsheltered homeless people make the transition to permanent housing and independent living, including shortening the period that individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units. The non-profit and faith -based community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are available to homeless families with children, and single men and women. The non-profit and faith -based community also serves special needs populations, such as victims of domestic violence, veterans, the disabled and youth. To prevent individuals and families who are at risk of homelessness due to domestic violence, the City will provide CDBG funds to the SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Program to assist 40 persons with domestic crisis intervention, domestic violence education groups and training, assistance with restraining orders, safety planning and case management. Riverside County Rape Crisis Center will assist 12 persons who have experienced domestic violence. Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless, especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or, receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing, health, social services, 59 employment, education, or youth needs The City participates in the Riverside County CoC. The Riverside County CoC Ten -Year Plan to End Homelessness included a goal to establish Countywide protocols and procedures to prevent people from being discharged from public and private institutions of care into homelessness that will help decrease the number of persons being discharged into homelessness by at least 10 percent annually. This would mean that the proportional share for the City would be a reduction of three homeless persons. The CoC is seeking improve coordination among publicly and privately funded institutions of care and local service agencies in the County of Riverside in order to decrease the number of persons being discharged into homelessness annually. The City is also funding the CASA program, which will provide case management assistance for foster care children. Discussion With limited CDBG resources available, the City is investing CDBG public service funds through the CDBG public service grants. Additionally, the City is investing general funds through the Police Department budget to provide for one sergeant and four full-time Homeless Outreach Team (HOT) Program officers to connect unsheltered homeless individuals and families with emergency shelter, transitional housing and permanent housing opportunities. The program also connects individuals with other services to address special needs such as drug and alcohol rehabilitation and mental health services. The City will continue to take a leadership role in the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance team meetings, where homeless providers will collaborate in addressing the homeless needs. .e AP-75 Barriers to affordable housing — 91.220(j) Introduction: A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing, such as land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements, environmental protection, cost of land and availability of monetary resources. Barriers to affordable housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful. Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2017-2021 Assessment of Fair Housing (AFH), the Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Survey, the 2014-2021 City of Temecula Housing Element and market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable housing. The two barriers are related in the sense that demand for affordable housing exceeds the supply and insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable housing to meet demand. Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on residential investment In the development of the 2014-2021 Housing Element, the City evaluated significant public policies affecting affordable housing development such as land use controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees and charges and growth limitations. Based on this evaluation, the City determined that it has taken significant steps to ameliorate the negative effects of public policies that may have been a barrier to affordable housing. Moreover, the City is actively engaged with affordable housing developers concerning the siting of affordable housing and ensuring that the entitlement process runs smoothly from inception to completion. The City's Housing Element has provided an affordable housing inventory. On September 25, 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance, which identifies sites throughout the City where transitional and supportive housing is allowed by right, identify incentives for affordable and senior housing. The City established an AHO on at least 100 acres. After the establishment of the AHO, sites identified will require: • Minimum densities of 20 units per acre; • 50% of the need (1,003 units) will be on sites allowing exclusively residential uses; 61 • Multi -family uses at the densities established under the AHO will be allowed by right, without a conditional use permit. The Affordable Housing Overlay was adopted by City Council on September 25, 2018. The City, in conjunction with the Temecula Trekkers, has hosted presentations to educate local housing advocates on fair housing issues and affordable housing issues. The City will continue to host multiple forums related to homelessness and those at risk of homelessness. The City has updated their fair housing webpage so that the information can be provided into 108 languages. This tool is available for all City web pages. Discussion: Although the City no longer has Redevelopment funding, the City will continue to leverage its local funds to attract private and other available public resources, including land conveyed to the City for affordable housing, to facilitate affordable housing development. This strategy will increase the supply of affordable housing and preserve existing affordable housing in the City. To address housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources for affordable housing, the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan calls for the investment of its Tax Allocation Bond proceeds over the next five (5) years to address its affordable housing needs. The City has approved the construction of 137 affordable housing units (Vine Creek and Las Haciendas), 21 of which are set aside for persons with disabilities. Both are subject to obtaining tax credits. In addition, the City adopted of an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance as an incentive for the construction of affordable housing by the private sector. 62 AP-85 Other Actions — 91.220(k) Introduction: In the implementation of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles in meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate -income people include lack of funding from federal, state and other local sources, the high cost of housing, and the lack of availability of home improvement financing in the private lending industry. Despite these obstacles, the City is investing CDBG funds through the 2021-2022 Action Plan in projects that provide low- and moderate -income homeowners for home improvements, fair housing services, public services to low- and moderate -income those with special needs, victims of domestic violence and those facing or experiencing homelessness. To address underserved population needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non -administrative CDBG investments for program year 2021-2022 to projects and activities that benefit low- and moderate -income people. Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing In the implementation of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG funds to preserve and maintain affordable housing through the Habitat for Humanity Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program, which will provide minor exterior home repairs for approximately five (5) owner -occupied single-family or manufactured housing units. Actions planned to reduce lead -based paint hazards The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing -based approaches. Because nearly all the City's housing stock was built after 1978, it is rare for the City to encounter lead -based paint hazards as part of its housing rehabilitation program. Should a hazard exist, the City will require lead - based paint testing and risk assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978 and safe work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead - based paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35. Habitat for Humanity has a policy that it will not use CDBG funds for rehabbing housing units constructed before 1978. 63 Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty -level families The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan and this Annual Action Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty -level families by: • Supporting activities that expand the supply of housing that is affordable to low- and moderate -income households; • Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is affordable to low - and moderate -income households; • Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate homelessness; • Supporting housing preservation programs that assure low-income households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and • Supporting public services for low- and moderate -income residents including those with special needs and those at -risk of homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG public services grants In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide pathways out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational opportunities. Additionally, in California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are CaIWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness. Actions planned to develop institutional structure The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high functioning and collaborative —particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development activities that are implemented by the City support and enhance this existing institutional structure. To address housing affordability and the lack of monetary resources for affordable housing, the 2017-2021 Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan calls for the investment of its Tax Allocation Bond proceeds over the next five (5) years to address its affordable housing needs. The City has approved the construction of 137 affordable housing units (Vine Creek and Las Haciendas), 21 of which are set aside for persons with disabilities. Both 64 are subject to obtaining tax credits. In addition, the City adopted of an Affordable Housing Overlay Zone ordinance as an incentive for the construction of affordable housing by the private sector. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies To enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies, the City will continue consulting with and inviting the participation of a wide variety of agencies and organizations involved in the delivery of housing and supportive services to low- and moderate - income residents in Temecula. Discussion: In the implementation of the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain affordable housing, reduce lead -based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty -level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between public and private housing and social service agencies. 65 AP-90 Program Specific Requirements — 91.220(1)(1,2,4) Introduction: In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program and recapture requirements for the HOME program. Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG) Reference 24 CFR 91.220(1)(1) Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is available for use that is included in projects to be carried out. 1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before $0 the start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be $0 used during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified in the grantee's Strategic Plan 3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements $0 4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the $0 planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan. 5. The amount of income from float -funded activities $0 Total Program Income $0 Other CDBG Requirements 1. The amount of urgent need activities 0 2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that benefit persons of low and moderate income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive period of three (3) years may be used to determine that a minimum overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low and moderate 100.00 income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action Plan. % Discussion: In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2021-2022 Annual Action Plan, the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program income, forms of investment and overall low- and moderate -income benefit for the CDBG program. M. Consolidated Plan and Action Plan Appendices Alternate / Local Data Sources.......................................................................................Appendix A Citizen Participation and Consultation........................................................................... Appendix 6 Grantee Unique Appendices........................................................................................... Appendix C Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications.............................................................Appendix D Appendix A Alternate / Local Data Sources 1 Data Source Name Riverside County 2020 Homeless Count Report List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. The County of Riverside Department of Public Social Services Homeless Programs Unit Provide a brief summary of the data set. There are 2,884 adults and children who are homeless during a point -in -time in the County of Riverside according to the Riverside County 2020 Homeless Count and Subpopulation Survey. This represents a 2.6% increase when compared to the number of homeless persons who were counted in 2019. What was the purpose for developing this data set? To meet HUD requirements. Provide the year (and optionally month, or month and day) for when the data was collected. The homeless count was conducted on the streets during the hours of 5 a.m. and 9 a.m. on January 29, 2020. The count was also conducted on the same day in shelters and transitional housing programs throughout the county. Briefly describe the methodology for the data collection. Data collection was obtained using HUD -required methods for the conduct of a PIT Count. Describe the total population from which the sample was taken. Per HUD's instructions, a person was considered homeless, and thus counted, only when he/she fell within the HUD -based definition by residing in places not meant for human habitation, such as cars, parks, sidewalks and abandoned buildings; in an emergency shelter; and In transitional housing for homeless persons. Describe the demographics of the respondents or characteristics of the unit of measure, and the number of respondents or units surveyed. See NA-40. 2 Data Source Name 2020 CoC Homeless Program Inventory Point in Time (PIT) Count List the name of the organization or individual who originated the data set. Riverside County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) Provide a brief summary of the data set. Provides the inventory of emergency, transitional and permanent supportive housing beds. What was the purpose for developing this data set? To monitor the effectiveness of HUD programs in addressing the needs of the homeless population How comprehensive is the coverage of this administrative data? Is data collection concentrated in one geographic area or among a certain population? The PIT covers the entire County's homeless population including Temecula. What time period (provide the year, and optionally month, or month and day) is covered by this data set? January 29, 2020 What is the status of the data set (complete, in progress, or planned)? Complete. Appendix B Citizen Participation and Consultation Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Affirmed Housing Affordable Housing AMCAL Multi -Housing Affordable Housing Assistance League of Temecula Valley Youth Services Atria Senior Living Senior Services Autism Society Inland Empire Health Services Better Days ARF Senior Services Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County Youth Services Bridge Housing Affordable Housing Building Industry Association Housing California Apartment Association Inland Empire Rental Property California State University San Marcos, Temecula Education Cameron Historical Building Affordable Housing Canine Support Teams Persons with Disabilities Catholic Charities Social Services Circle of Care Ministries Food Bank City of Murrieta Municipal Government City of Temecula Municipal Government Coachella Valley Housing Coalition Affordable Housing Community Access Center Services for those with Disabilities Community Mission of Hope Homeless provider Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Comprehensive Autism Center Health Services County of Riverside Department of Social Services Social Services County of Riverside Economic Development Agency Local Government County of Riverside Health Department Health Services Riverside University Health System — Behavioral Health, Homeless Housing Opportunities, Partnerships & Education Program Mental Health Court Appointed Special Advocate of Riverside County Youth Services Creekside Senior Apartments Senior Housing Desert AIDS AIDS Service Provider Economic Development of Southwest California Economic Development Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside County, Inc. Fair Housing Foothill AIDS AIDS Fountain Glen at Temecula Senior Housing Front Street Plaza Affordable Housing Go Banana Special Needs GRID Alternatives Affordable Housing Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley Affordable Housing Heritage Mobile Home Estates Affordable Housing Hitzke Consulting Affordable Housing Hospice of the Valleys Health Services Housing Authority of the County of Riverside Public Housing Authority Hugs Foster Family Agency Services for Those with Developmental disabilities Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Iglesia Bautista del Valle de Temecula Faith -Based Organizations Inland Regional Center Services for Those with Developmental disabilities Jamboree Housing Affordable Housing Jesus Love Church Faith -based Organization John Stewart Company Affordable Housing Ken Follis Realtor, developer League of Women Voters Nonprofit organization Legacy Ridge Services for those with Developmental disabilities Love of Christ Fellowship Church Faith -based Organization Madera Vista Apartments Affordable Housing Michelle's Place Healthcare Mission Village Apartments Affordable Housing Mt San Jacinto College Education NAACP Protected Class Nu -Way International Christian Ministries Faith -based Organization Oak Tree Apartments Affordable Housing Our Nicholas Foundation Services for those with Autism Palomar Heritage Affordable Housing Pechanga Casino and Resort Employer Path of Life Ministries Homeless provider Portola Terrace Apartments Affordable Housing Project Touch Homeless services provider Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Rancho California Apartments Affordable housing Rancho Community Church Faith -based Organization Rancho Creek Apartments Affordable Housing Rancho Damacitas Foster Youth Services Rancho en Espanol Faith -based organization Rancho West Apartments Affordable Housing Renee Jennex Small Family Health Services Riverbank Village Apartments Affordable Housing Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Domestic Violence Riverside City and County Continuum of Care Homeless services provider Riverside County Office on Aging Senior Services Riverside County Veterans Services Veteran Services Riverside County Sheriff's Department Crime protection Riverside Transit Agency Transportation Rose Again Foundation Foster Youth SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Domestic Violence Safety Research Associates, Inc. Special Needs and Senior Housing Senior Care Referral Specialists Senior Services Senior Citizens Service Center Food Bank Food Bank Single Mothers in Rewarding Fellowship (SMURF) Youth Services Solari Enterprises Affordable Housing Southwest Riverside County Association of Realtors Housing St. Catherine's Catholic Church Faith -based organization Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type State Council on Developmental Disabilities Services for those with Developmental Disabilities TEAM Evangelical Assistance Ministries Food Bank City of Temecula Planning Commission City Commission City of Temecula Community Services Commission City Commission City of Temecula Public Safety Commission City Commission Visit Temecula Valley Convention and Visitors Bureau Business Community Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission Homeless Services Provider Temecula Reflection Townhouses Affordable Housing Temecula Homeless Coalition Homeless services provider Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Business Community Temecula Valley Historical Society Non -Profit Organization Temecula Valley Hospital Health Services Temecula Valley Therapy Services for Individuals with Disabilities Temecula Valley Unified School District Education Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association Employer The Center for Life Change Drug Treatment U.S. Vets Initiative Veteran Services VA Loma Linda Healthcare Veteran Services Vintage View Apartments Affordable housing Voice of Children Youth Services Warehouse at Creekside Apartments Affordable Housing Wells Fargo Business Community Stakeholder Consultation List Agency Type Western Riverside Council of Governments Regional Government Note: For some of the above agencies, there are multiple stakeholders, but the agency is listed once. NOFA Workshop Notice THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR CLERKIRECORDING STAMP PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C. C. P. ) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to orinterested in the above -entitled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of THE CALIFORNIAN An Edfhon of The San Diego onion-Tritxrne A newspaper of general circulation, published DAILY in the City of Temecula, California, 92590, County of Riverside, Three Lake Judicial District, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court o f the County of Riverside, State of California, under the date of February 26, 1991, Case Number 209105; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not in any supplement thereof, on the following dates, to wit: November 271h, 2020 1 cerfffy 'or declare) under penaiiy of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated at TEMECULA, California, this 30th, day of November, 2020 Is/ c a� Ja Allshouse - Legal Advertising The Californian - an Edition of the San Diego Union Tribune 28441 Rancho California Rd. Suite 103, Temecula, CA 92590 CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY MEETING NOTICE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) The City of Temecula annually receives Community Development Black Grant (CDBG) program funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The City is now acneppii�rng applications for CDBG funding under its Fiacal Year (FY) 2021-22 WUD formula entitlements. Two virtual community meetings will be held by the City of Temecula on (Tuesday, December 0, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. and second being held at 5:00 p.m.) The purpose of these meetings is to discuss the City's COgG program and funding for FY 2021-22, and to provide technical assistance to nonprofit organizations (501 (c) 13)] and govemment agencies that will be submitting an application requesting C08G funds from the City of Temecula. Alt agencies or entities applying for CDBG funding assistance must complete the application. All interested citizens are invited to attend. Citizen 'input regarding community development and dousing needs for the City of Temecula is encouraged and will be considered in the development of CDBG activities Ter the City Annual Action Plan (AAP) for FY 2021-22. beginning Jury 1, 2021. Zoom Meeting Links- (9:00 AM: https:llus02web.zao_m_usIj1926B34958Q9) (5:00 PM): h=sJaysO byeb.zoom.usli/89777262563} The fnllr]wing is an approximate timaiine for the awarding of annual funds. Summary of the CDBG Funding TimelineG CDBapplications disseminated/available online November 23, 2020 • CD8G overview and application assistance workshop December 8, 2020 • Deadline for submission of applications December 18, 2020 • Finance Committee Review February 2021 • 30-day public review for Draft Annual Action Plan (AAP) March 27 - April 27. 2021 - City Council Public Hearing on AAP April 27, 2021 Program year begins July 1, 2021 - Provide award letters to grant subrecipients July 2021 Please direct any questions to Frank Perez, CDBG Program Consultant, at (951) 693 3928 or frark.oerezC�tOfSl@g1fili:S;B,,y,Qy Persons needing special accommodations or a translator should make their re Sl one week before the meeting so that the City can assure the special needs are met. For more information on the program and In download the application, please Wsit the City's website, htttn:l/Yemectrlaca.9ovICO9G Publish: November 27. 2020 THIS SPACE RESERVED FOR CLERKIRECORDING STAMP PROOF OF PUBLICATION (2015.5 C.C. P.) STATE OF CALIFORNIA County of Riverside I am a citzen of the United States and a resident of the County aforesaid: I am over the age of eighteen years and not a party to or interested in the above-entifled matter. I am the principal clerk of the printer of THE CALIFORNIAN An Edition of The San Diego Union -Tribune A newspaper of general circulation, published DAILY in the City of Temecula, California, 92590, County of Riverside, Three Lake Judicial District, and which newspaper has been adjudicated a newspaper of general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, under the date of February 26, 1991, Case Number 209105; that the notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil, has been published in each regular and entire issue of said newspaper and not In anysipplement thereof, on the following dates, to wit: November 27fh, 2020 I certify `or declare) under penally of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated of TENECULA, California, this 30th, day of November, 2020 I sl Ja Allshouse - Legal Advertising The Californian - an Edition of the San Diego Union Tribune 28441 Rancho California Rd. Suite 103, Temecula, CA 92590 AVUNTAMIENTO DE LA CIUDAD DE TEMECULA AVISO DE REUNION COMUNITARIA PROGRAMA DE SUBSIDIOS GLOBALES PARA EL DESARRRLLO COMUNITARIO (CDBG) EI Ayu ntamionto On la Ciudad de Temecula recibe anualmente tondos del Prnggrama de Subsidio Globales para el Desarrollo Comunilano (CDFI . per sus siglas en ingl6s) por parte del Drps�rl 1r 11vi llu [1b Vivierrscle y Dnaari olio Lirb's]nu du iva Ealadua Urn dos (HUD, per sus siglas en ingl6s). El ayuntamiento ahora estb aceptando solicitudes Para Tondos de CDBG finandados Ab a as derechos de jurisdicci6n de to f6rmula de HUD para el W. Fiscal 2021-22_ Se 1levar6n a cabo dos reunions de la comunidad virtual an nombre de la Ciudad de Temecula el (Marles, 8 de, diciembre de 2020 a las 9.00 a.m. y la segunda a las 5:00 p.m_) Ell prop6sito de estas reunianes as para discutir at Programs de CDBG del Ayuntamiento y sus fondos Para el Ano Fiscal 2021-2022, y proporclonar ascia Wonice a las organizaciones sin fines Iucrati=' s [isten501(c)(3)] y agencias gubemamentales que presentarAn una solicitud pars racibir €ondos de CD6G del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula. Todas las aggencias a entidades que salicitan asistencia de fondos de C013G deben completer la solicitud, Todos ios ciudadanos intaresados estan invitados is asistlr. Las aportaciones de [as ciudadanos en relaci6n con el desarrotto comunitario y las necesidades de vivienda de to Ciudad de Temecula se incentivan y a la vez yer¢n cpngldaradas on to aIat� .Ci6n ds Is$ actividadas de CDBG pare el Plan de Desempeno Anual [AAP, por sus siglas an ing$6s) Para el a8o fiscal 2021-22. of coal comienza at 1 de Julio del 2021. Zoom Meeting Links: 9:00 AM: h s� lu 2we _ _US)- 92B6349 86 S:OO Ill htt-11 02w x m.us 897772625fi3 Lo siguiento as un crpnngrama aproximado pare is adjudicaci6n de fondos anuales. Resumen del Cronograma Para la Aslgnaci6n de Fondos de CDBG • Solicitudes de CDBG diseminadas El 23 de Noviembre del 2020 • Visi6n general de CDBG y tatter the asistencia pare solicitudes El 8 de Didembre de4 2020 • Fechn lirnite Para sumial6n de apltaitudes El 18 de Dicterribre del 2020 - Revision del Comil6 de rinanzas En Febroro del 2021 - Revisidn Publica de 30 dias del Bonador del Plan de Du"ropoilo Anual El 27 de Marzo al 27 de Abrii 2021 • Audiencia l ice del Concejo Municipal del Ayuntamiento sobre AAP El 27 de Abril del 2021 - Comienzo del Programa Anual EI 1 de Julia del 2021 • Proporcionar cartas de adjudications a los sub—ecipientes de sul idios En Julio del 2021 Si usted liens pregunta9, por favor cnmuni uese con Frank Perez, Consultor del program. C1]6G, al (951T 6S3-3928 o via corroo etectr6nico a frank.aerezWameculaca.eov_ Las Personas que oecesiten adaptations esl isles o un traductor deben presentar so petsci6n una semana antes de las reuniones Para fin de que ei Ayuntamiento pueda asegurar que laz necesidodes especiales sean proporcionadas debidamente_ Para obtener rn$g irzfun rrauidn sGt�re al proyrall)o yy cIFaS4t+rypr la sulkGtud, visits el sitio web del Ayyuntamiento de 4a Ciudad de Temecula a h1tp'!!temracular-8 govIcil G- Pubhcar[ EI 27 do Noviembre del 2020 Finance Committee Public Notice In compliance with the Americans Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Clerk's Department at 951-694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] MEETING NOTICE/AGENDA FINANCE SUBCOMMITTEE GREAT OAK CONFERENCE ROOM 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2021 4:00 PM IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THIS MEETING This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the Senior Management Analyst. Email comments must be submitted to brandon.rabidou@temeculaca.gov. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. Reading of Public Comments: The Senior Management Analyst shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed five (5) minutes, or such other time as the Subcommittee may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Subcommittee meeting. The email comments shall become part of the meeting record. CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: Mayor Maryann Edwards and Mayor Pro Tem Matt Rahn PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Committee on items that are not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. For this meeting, public comments may be submitted and read into the record pursuant to the important notice provided at the top of this agenda. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Funding Recommendations for 2021-2022 CDBG Applications. ADJOURNMENT 2/11/2021 Date Randi Johl, City C erk NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC Due to the closure of City Hall and other city facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), will be available for public viewing on the City's website at https:Htemeculaca.gov/911/Committee-Noticed-Meetings at least 72 hours prior to meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694- 6444. Summary of Public Comments at Public Hearings and Community Meetings Technical Workshop for Notice of Funding Availability December 8, 2020 Staff answered questions regarding application submittal process and eligibility issues. Temecula Finance Committee Meeting Tuesday, February 23, 2021 No public comments received. Finance committee convened and determined funding recommendations for City Council to consider. Public Hearing Tuesday, April 27, 2021 Comments will be inserted after the meeting. Appendix C Grantee Unique Appendices Th. Hea. orso aa-c.iro y Fiscal Year 2019-20 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report LARGEST EMPLOYERS BY NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES Current Year and Nine Years Ago Percent of Percent of Number of Total Number of Total NAME OF EMPLOYER Employees Employment Employees Employment As of June 2011 As of June 2020 Temecula Valley Unified School District 2,749 4.29% 2,600 4.19% Abbott Laboratories (aka Guidant) 2,938 4.59% 1,500 2.42% Temecula Valley Hospital - 0.00% 900 1.45% PHS Medline (aka Professional Hospital Supply) 1,100 1.72% 900 1.45% Infineon Technologies (aka International Rectifier) 700 1.09% 650 1.05% Walmart - 0.00% 570 0.92% Southwest Traders, Inc 233 0.36% 455 0.73% MilgardManufacturing lnc.(DBAMilgardWndows&Coors) 210 0.33% 450 0.73% Costco Wholesale 373 0.58% 420 0.68% Millipore Sigma 272 0.42% 350 0.56% DCH Auto Group Temecula (aka Norm Reeves Auto) 260 0.41 % 326 0.53% Channell Corporation 184 0.29% 311 0.50% FFF Enterprises 178 0.28% 300 0.48% City of Temecula 153 0.24% 176 0.28% Macy's 300 0.47% 295 0.48% The Scotts Company 120 0.19% 290 0.47% Paradise Chevrolet Cadillac - 0.00% 270 0.44% Temecula Valley Toyota 170 0.27% 240 0.39% Home Depot#1028 143 0.22% 225 0.36% Air Bus IDS Communications - 0.00% 190 0.31% Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. - 0.00% 175 0.28% Lowe's #775 152 0.24% 169 0.27% Target 174 0.27% 168 0.27% Rancho Family Medical Group - 0.00% 167 0.27% National Merchants Association 0.00% 160 0.26% WinCo Foods 0.00% 154 0.25% BJ's Restaurant & Brewery - 0.00% 150 0.24% Opto 22 135 0.53% 150 0.24% Pacific Hydraulic Services/MWA - 0.00% 150 0.24% Temecula Valley Winery Management - 0.00% 150 0.24% Rancho California Water District 150 0.23% 150 0.24% JC Penney 170 0.53% 138 0.22% Gosh Ford Lincoln Mercury (AKA Rancho Ford) 97 0.15% 120 0.19% Stater Brothers Market 105 0.16% 110 0.18% Source: City of Temecula -Finance Department, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Fiscal Year 2019-20 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report 189 Appendix D City of Temecula Map of Eligible CDBG Areas City of Temecula if 14 "�Wt-L - o aSw CDBG— LOW AND MODERATE INCOME AREA MAP 2919-2015 A[$ DAM LAa of F6Eru9ry 14 2619} LEGEM. ..— GT'BOUW RY LOW AND MODERJkTE INCOME BLOCK GROUPS CENSUS 7PAOT BLACK GROUP Appendix E Grantee SF-424s and Action Plan Certifications To be inserted after the Public Hearing on April 27, 2021. PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING AND PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE CITY OF TEMECULA 2021-2022 CDBG ACTION PLAN Pursuant to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations, the City of Temecula has prepared a 2021-2022 Action Plan. The 2021-2022 Action Plan is the City's application to HUD for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds delineating the projects to be undertaken during the program year. The Action Plan identifies the federal and other resources expected to be used to address the priority needs and goals noted in the City's Five -Year Consolidated Plan (2017-2021) adopted by the City in 2017. The City anticipates receiving approximately $555,982 in CDBG funds during 2021-2022. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a copy of this draft document will be available to the public for review and comment from March 28, 2021, to April 27, 2021. Due to the closure of City Hall and other city buildings and facilities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the document is only viewable on the City website at http://temeculaca.gov/CDBG. For more information regarding the Action Plan, please contact Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506-5142 or via at brandon.rabidou(atemeculaca.gov NOTICE IS HEREBY FURTHER GIVEN that the Temecula City Council will conduct a virtual public hearing on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter. The purpose of the public hearing is as follows: a. To receive public comments, suggestions or other information for consideration prior to approving the 2021-2022 Action Plan. b. To approve the 2021-2022 Action Plan. This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20 dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. Submission of Public Comments: For those wishing to make public comments at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting, please submit your comments by email to be read aloud at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to the City Clerk at randi.johl(d),temeculaca.gov. Email comments on public hearing items must be received prior to the time the public hearing is opened to hear public comments. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this meeting may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. For more information, contact Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506-5142. Reading of Public Comments: The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed three (3) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments submitted shall become part of the meeting record. Additional information regarding the City of Temecula's CDBG program may be obtained from Brandon Rabidou at (951) 506-5142. The City of Temecula is committed to providing reasonable accommodation for persons with special needs and non-English speaking individuals. If you require these accommodations, please call for assistance at (951) 506-5142 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Publish: March 28, 2021 AVISO PUBLICO AVISO DE AUDIENCIA PUBLICA Y PERIODO DE COMENTARIOS PUBLICOS PARA EL PLAN DE DESEMPENO 2021-2022 DEL AYUNTAMIENTO DE LA CIUDAD DE TEMECULA Conforme a las regulaciones del Departamento de Vivienda y Desarrollo Urbano de los Estados Unidos (HUD, por sus siglas en ingl6s), el Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula ha preparado el Plan Desempeno 2021-2022. El Plan de Desempeno 2021-2022 es la solicitud del Ayuntamiento para HUD para los fondos de Subsidios Globales para el Desarrollo Comunitario (CDBG, por sus siglas en ingl6s), el cual delinea los proyectos que se llevaran a cabo durante el programa anual. El Plan de Desempeno identifica los recursos federales y otros recursos que se anticipa ser utilizados para abordar las prioridades de las necesidades y metas mencionadas en el Plan Consolidado de Cinco Anos (2017-2021) del Ayuntamiento adoptado en 2017. El Ayuntamiento anticipa recibir aproximadamente $555,928 en fondos de CDBG durante el periodo 2021-2022. POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que una copia de los borradores de dichos documentos estaran disponibles al publico para su revisi6n y comentarios a partir del 28 de marzo de 2021, al 27 de abril de 2021. Debido al cierre de la Biblioteca y otros Establecimientos a Instalaciones del Ayuntamiento a causa del Nuevo Coronavirus (COVID-19), el documento estara solamente visible en el sitio web del Ayuntamiento en hqp://temeculaca.gov/CDBG. Para obtener mayor informaci6n referente al Plan de Desempeno, por favor comuniquese con Brandon Rabidou al (951) 506-5142 o correo electr6nico a brandon.rabidougtemeculaca.gov. ADEMAS, POR MEDIO DE LA PRESENTE SE NOTIFICA que el Concejo Municipal del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, llevara a cabo una audiencia publica el martes, 27 de abril de 2021, a las 7:00 p.m. o un poco despu6s. El prop6sito de la audiencia publica es por to siguiente: a. Para recibir comentarios, sugerencias u otra informaci6n para ser considerados antes de la aprobac16n del Plan de Desempeno 2021-2022. b. Para aprobar el Plan de Desempeno 2021-2022. Esta junta se esta llevando a cabo utilizando medios electr6nicos y de teleconferencia consistentes con la Orden Ejecutiva N-29-20 del Estado de California con fecha del 17 de marzo de 2020, con respecto a la pandemia COVID-19. La transmisi6n en vivo de la junta puede verse en televisi6n y/o en Linea. Los detalles se pueden encontrar en temeculaca.gov/tv. En conformidad con la Orden Ejecutiva N-29-20, el publico solo puede ver la reuni6n en televisi6n y/o en Linea y no en la Camara del Concejo. Presentaci6n de comentarios publicos: Para aquellos que deseen hacer comentarios publicos en la junta del Concejo Municipal del 27 de abril de 2021, envie sus comentarios por correo electr6nico para ser leidos en voz alta en la junta por el Secretario Municipal del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad. Los comentarios electr6nicos sobre los puntos del orden del dia de la junta del Concejo Municipal del 27 de abril de 2021 s6lo podran enviarse por correo electr6nico y no se aceptaran comentarios a trav6s de texto y redes sociales (Facebook, Twitter, etc., no seran aceptados). Los comentarios por correo electr6nico deben enviarse al Secretario Municipal del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad al randi.johl&temecula.gov. Para mayor informaci6n, comuniquese con Brandon Rabidou al (951) 506-5142. Lectura de comentarios publicos: El Secretario Municipal del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad leery todos los comentarios recibidos por correo electr6nico, siempre que la lectura no exceda de tres (3) minutos, o el resto del tiempo que el Concejo pueda proporcionar, de conformidad con el plazo para los exponentes en una junta del Concejo. Los comentarios por correo electr6nico presentados formaran parte del acta de la junta del Concejo. Informaci6n adicional referente al programa de CDBG del Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula, puede ser obtenida comunicandose con Brandon Rabidou al (951) 506-5142. El Ayuntamiento de la Ciudad de Temecula esta comprometido a proporcionar acomodo especial para las personas con necesidades especiales y para individuos que no hablan el idioma ingl6s. Si usted requiere alguno de estos acomodos, por favor llame para solicitar asistencia al (951) 506-5142 por to menos 48 horas antes de la junta. Publicado: 28 de marzo de 2021 Item No. 24 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution to Amend the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program PREPARED BY: Ron Moreno, Senior Civil Engineer Anissa Sharp, Office Specialist II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THAT IT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15061, 15062 AND 15378 BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a Member Jurisdiction of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and eighteen (18) cities located in Western Riverside County. Acting in concert, in 2002-2003, WRCOG member jurisdictions developed a plan whereby the shortfall in funds needed to enlarge the capacity of the Regional System of Highways and Arterials due to new development in Western Riverside County could be made up in part by a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee ("TUMF") on future residential, commercial, and industrial development. As a member jurisdiction of WRCOG and as a TUMF participating jurisdiction, the City of Temecula participated in the preparation of a certain "Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Fee Nexus Study," ("2002 Nexus Study") later adopted by the WRCOG Executive Committee. Based on the 2002 Nexus Study, the City of Temecula adopted and implemented an ordinance authorizing the City's participation in a TUMF Program. Pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act (Gov. Code § § 66000 et seq.), WRCOG prepared a new Nexus Study ("2016 Nexus Study") to update the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions update their fees by amending their applicable TUMF Ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF Network and the cost of construction. FISCAL IMPACT: The City of Temecula's existing ordinance provides the legal basis for a revised TUMF schedule. The attached resolution will establish the Fee Schedule for TUMF as follows: From January 1, 2021 the fee schedule shall be as follows: (1) $9,810.00 per single family residential unit (2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit (3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project (4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project (5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project (6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE APPLICABLE TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) APPLICABLE TO ALL DEVELOPMENTS IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND FINDING THAT IT IS EXEMPT FROM CEQA PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 15061, 15062 AND 15378 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula ("City") is a member agency of the Western Riverside Council of Governments ("WRCOG"), a joint powers agency comprised of the County of Riverside and eighteen cities located in Western Riverside County; and WHEREAS, the member agencies of WRCOG recognized that there was insufficient funding to address the impacts of new development on the regional system of highways and arterials in Western Riverside County (the "Regional System"); and WHEREAS, in order to address this shortfall, the member agencies formulated a plan whereby a transportation mitigation fee would be assessed on new development and would be used to fund the necessary improvements for the Regional System; and WHEREAS, WRCOG, with the assistance of TUMF Program participating jurisdictions, has prepared an updated Nexus Study entitled "Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Nexus Study: 2016 Update" ("2016 Nexus Study") pursuant to California Government Code sections 66000 et seq. (the Mitigation Fee Act), for the purpose of updating the fees. On July 10, 2017, the WRCOG Executive Committee reviewed the 2016 Nexus Study and TUMF Program and recommended TUMF participating jurisdictions amend their applicable TUMF ordinances to reflect changes in the TUMF network and the cost of construction in order to update the TUMF Program; and WHEREAS, consistent with its previous findings made in the adoption of Resolution No. 2020-30 the City Council has been informed and advised, and hereby finds, that if the capacity of the Regional System is not enlarged and unless development contributes to the cost of improving the Regional System, the result will be substantial traffic congestion in all parts of Western Riverside County, with unacceptable Levels of Service. Furthermore, the failure to mitigate growing traffic impacts on the Regional System will substantially impair the ability of public safety services (police and fire) to respond and, thus, adversely affect the public health, safety and welfare. Therefore, continuation of a TUMF Program is essential; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the use of the TUMF and the type of development projects on which the fees are imposed because the fees will be used to construct the transportation improvements that are necessary for the safety, health, and welfare of the residential and non-residential users of the development in which the TUMF will be levied; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that there is a reasonable and rational relationship between the need for the improvements to the Regional System and the type of development projects on which the TUMF is imposed because it will be necessary for the residential and non-residential users of such projects to have access to the Regional system. Such development will benefit from the Regional System improvements and the burden of such developments will be mitigated in part by payment of the TUMF; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that the cost estimates set forth in the new 2016 Nexus Study are reasonable cost estimates for constructing the Regional System improvements and the facilities that compromise the Regional System, and that the amount of the TUMF expected to be generated by new development will not exceed the total fair share cost to such development; and WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to the TUMF Ordinance shall be used to help pay for the design, planning, construction of and real property acquisition for the Regional System improvements and its facilities as identified in the 2016 Nexus Study. The need for the improvements and facilities is related to new development because such development results in additional traffic and creates the demand for the improvements; WHEREAS, section 15.08.040 (A) of the TUMF Ordinance authorizes periodic review and adjustment to the applicable TUMF in accordance with any adjustments made by the WRCOG Executive Committee; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2019, the WRCOG Executive Committee approved the CCI adjustment based upon the annual change in Construction Cost Index (CCI) as described in the TUMF Administrative Plan. WHEREAS, the fees collected pursuant to this Resolution shall be used to finance the public facilities described or identified in the Nexus Study; and WHEREAS, the levying of TUMF has been reviewed by the City Council and staff in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the CEQA Guidelines and it has been determined that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3), 15062, and 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of Temecula does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. Findings. The recitals set forth above are hereby adopted as findings in support of this Resolution. In addition, the City Council re -adopts the findings contained in Section 15.08.020 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code in support of the adjusted TUMF contained herein. SECTION 2. TUMF Schedule. In accordance with Section 15.08.040 (A) of the Temecula Municipal Code, there is hereby adopted the following fee schedule for the TUMF which replaces the fee schedule set forth in Section 2 of Resolution No. 2020-30 in its entirety as of July 1, 2021 . N A. There is hereby adopted the following TUMF schedule: (1) $9,146.00 per single-family residential unit (2) $6,134.00 per multi -family residential unit (3) $1.77 per square foot of an industrial project (4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project (5) $4.56 per square foot of a service commercial project (6) $2.19 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office B. The fees set forth in Section 2.A. shall be phased in as follows: From July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020, the fee schedule shall be as follows: (1) $9,478.00 per single family residential unit (2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit (3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project (4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project (5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project (6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office From January 1, 2021, the fee schedule shall be as follows: (1) $9,810.00 per single family residential unit (2) $6,389.00 per multi -family residential unit (3) $1.81 per square foot of an industrial project (4) $7.50 per square foot of a retail commercial project (5) $4.75 per square foot of a service commercial project (6) $2.38 per square foot of a service Class A and B Office SECTION 3. CEQA Findings. The City Council hereby determines, in accordance with 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 15061(b) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA Guidelines") that the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Schedule as described in this Resolution is not a "project" within the meaning of Section 15378 and Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. The Resolution establishes a funding mechanism for potential transportation improvements and does not approve the construction nor cause the construction of any specific transportation improvements within Riverside County. This Resolution will have no effect on the environment. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(d)and 15062, the City Manager is hereby directed to cause a Notice of Exemption to be prepared, executed and filed for the foregoing determination in the manner required by law, that this is not a project under the California Environmental Quality Act and, therefore, not environmental impact assessment is necessary. SECTION 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall become on July 1, 2021. 3 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of April, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of , April, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk M Notice of Public Hearin THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. APPLICANT: City of Temecula Location: Citywide PROPOSAL: Adopt a resolution amending the applicable Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) applicable to all developments in the City of Temecula. ENVIRONMENTAL ACTION: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the City Council will make a finding that the proposed ordinance and resolution are exempt from the requirements of CEQA pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the Public Resources Code and Sections 15273 and 15378(b)(4) of the State CEQA Guidelines and that there is no possibility that the ordinance and resolution would have a significant impact on the environment. DATE OF HEARING: April 27, 2021 TIME OF HEARING: 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard. PLACE OF HEARING/HEARING PROCEDURES: This meeting at which the public hearing will be held is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing and electronic means consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020, regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. In accordance with the order, the public may not view the meeting in -person in the Council Chamber. The live stream of the meeting may be viewed on television and/or online. Details can be found at temeculaca.gov/tv. For those wishing to make public comments at the public hearing, you must send your comments by email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johlktemeculaca.gov. Email comments on the public hearing must be received prior to the close of the public hearing. All email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern public comments at an in -person meeting. Public Comments for this public hearing may only be submitted via email. Comments via text and social media will not be accepted. The City Clerk shall read all email comments, provided that the reading shall not exceed five (5) minutes, or such other time as the Council may provide, consistent with the time limit for speakers at an in -person Council meeting. The email comments shall become part of the meeting record. Email shall include written correspondence. JUDICIAL REVIEW: Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. If you would like further information about the proposed TUMF Resolution, please contact Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works, at (951) 694-6411. Item No . 25 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with Applied Development Economics and Appoint Blue Ribbon Committee Members for the Update to the Quality of Life Master Plan PREPARED BY: Matt Peters, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an Agreement for Consultant Services with Applied Development Economics, in the amount of $175,050, with a 10% contingency of $17,505, for a total agreement amount of $192,555, to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), and appoint Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) members to assist in developing the update to the plan. BACKGROUND: The Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) was adopted during the Fall of 2011 and identified six Core Values including: 1. Healthy and Livable City; 2. Economic Prosperity; 3. A Safe and Prepared Community; 4. A Sustainable City; 5. Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6. Accountable and Responsive City Government The plan includes specific goals; key accomplishments; key findings; metrics of progress; and strategic priorities. The City's Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and Annual Operating Budget (AOB) are reviewed annually for conformance with the City's Core Values identified in the QLMP. Given the substantial progress made to implement the QLMP during the last several years, the General Plan Update Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Maryann Edwards and Mayor Pro-Tem Matt Rahn, decided it was an opportunity to update the QLMP. In addition, the update will include a seventh Core Value, currently referred to as "Equity." The newly established Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Commission will provide significant input on the development of this section of the plan. On April 13, 2021, after soliciting interest from Commission and Board Members, the General Plan Update Subcommittee selected representatives to serve on a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC). The BRC will be responsible for guiding development of the QLMP by attending meetings, reviewing data and reports, and providing input at meetings facilitated by the Consultant. Commission and Board members who serve on the BRC will have the additional responsibility to report back to their assigned Commission/Board to provide updates and solicit further input. In addition to one representative from each Commission and Board, the BRC will also include a diverse group of stakeholders to represent a wide range of interests in the City. It is further intended that the QLMP will set the foundation for a comprehensive update to the City's General Plan using the seven Core Values as the organizing principles. Staff will present additional details regarding the QLMP update process and a four -phase work program to update the General Plan by 2025. FISCAL IMPACT: The $192,555 consultant fee is completely funded by a Housing and Community Development (HCD) S132 Planning Grant. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement with Applied Development Economics 2. Exhibit A and B - Proposal 3. QLMP Process Graphic 4. Blue Ribbon Committee List AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND APPLIED DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS QUALITY OF LIFE MASTER PLAN UPDATE THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of April 13, 2021, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Applied Development Economics an S Corporation, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on April 13, 2021 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2023, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed One Hundred Seventy -Five Thousand Fifty Dollars and Zero Cents ($175,050.00), plus 10% Contingency if applicable of Seventeen Thousand Five Hundred Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($17,505.00) for the total term of this agreement for a total not to exceed Agreement amount of One Hundred Ninety -Two Thousand Five Hundred Fifty -Five Dollars and Zero Cents ($192,555.00) unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. C. The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement as approved by City Council. Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by the City Council. 12/31 /2020 d. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 5. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to 12/31 /2020 examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. 9. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS a. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. b. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. 12/31 /2020 C. Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional Liability Coverage: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. d. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). e. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effective date. 12/31 /2020 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. f. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. g. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project 12/31 /2020 or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: Applied Development Economics Attn: Doug Svensson 3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd., #248 Lafayette, CA 94549 14. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 16. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in 12/31 /2020 the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 17. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 19. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 12/31 /2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By APPLIED DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS '1 t { BY: Doug Sv son, AICP, President By: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Applied Development Economics Attn: Doug Svensson, AICP 3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd., #248 Lafayette, CA 94549 (925) 934-8712 dsvensson adeusa.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: !4Y 03-18-2021 12/31 /2020 EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed All tasks to be performed are per the proposal provided by the Consultant attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 12/31 /2020 EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Cost for services shall be as per Contractors proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $192,555.00 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 10 12/31 /2020 A P P L I E D EXHIBIT A and B DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS March 1, 2021 Mr. Matthew Peters, Senior Planner City of Temecula 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Proposal for Update of Quality of Life Master Plan Dear Matt: We are pleased to submit this proposal to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) for Temecula. As you are aware, my firm prepared the original QLMP in 2010 and for this update we have also included MIG, Inc., who bring a wealth of experience in community engagement and planning and have previously assisted the City with the Youth Master Plan among other projects. The proposed scope of work is described on the following pages, followed by our budget proposal. We proposed to complete the plan for a not -to -exceed cost of $192,555, including a 10% contingency; however, we have also outlined additional optional activities the City may wish to consider to further strengthen the community outreach and final product. We appreciate this opportunity and look forward to any questions you may have. Sincerely, Doug Svensson, AICP President 3527 Mt. Diablo Blvd. #248, Lafayette, CA 94549 ■ Tel 925.934.8712 www.adeusa.com CITY OF TEMECULA QUALITY OF LIFE MASTER PLAN UPDATE SCOPE OF WORK INTRODUCTION The City of Temecula has made extensive use of the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP) adopted in 2011. In the past ten years, it is estimated the City has already accomplished as much as two-thirds of the implementation projects identified in the QLMP. Now, as the City prepares to update its General Plan, the City would like to update the QLMP to reaffirm the Core Values, update progress on the indicators and identify additional implementation projects for the next 20 years. In addition, the updated QLMP will provide confirmation of the Community's vision for the future and a framework for updating the General Plan. The process for updating the QLMP will include a multi -faceted community engagement program as well as data analysis to update the indicators and implementation projects. The graphic on page 3 portrays the various elements of the program, which are further described in the task descriptions below. TASK 1: PROJECT INITIATION AND MANAGEMENT The project start will include an initiation meeting with the Consultants and City staff to review the proposed process, timeline and community engagement program. MIG will prepare a final community and education and engagement plan reflecting this discussion. Subsequently, the Consultants will meet regularly with City staff (biweekly or monthly depending on the need), to review progress and next steps throughout the process. In addition, the Consultants will facilitate two (2) staff workshops with City personnel from all relevant departments. TASK 2: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ACTIVITIES BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE The City will form a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to serve as the main steering committee to advise and coordinate with the ADE/MIG Team throughout the process. The Consultants will conduct a series of structured, facilitated meetings to review the project plan, review preliminary work products, provide input on key issues and identify key stakeholders and groups in the community to include in the outreach process. The process will include six (6) BRC meetings as follows: 1. Project Kick-off - review of experience with 2010 QLMP, goals for the update, describe BRC role and charge, confirm update process and community outreach plans. 2. Review updates of existing indicators and discuss core values 1-3. 3. Review and discuss core values 4-6 4. Discuss the addition of a seventh value for social equity. Review City vision language and receive input from community engagement process. 5. Provide input on implementation projects. 6. Review Draft QLMP Update document. The ADE/MIG Team would compile analysis and conduct community outreach activities in between the BRC meetings in order to provide discussion material for the committee and to gain their input for subsequent steps in the process. Applied Development Economics I Page 2 Aft 7/4-v,� OA (The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Recruit and Select BRC Meeting 61 Blue Ribbonsw�^� CbrnmitteeCammu,.y f�rygm«� Members -.1 E�2 fa-wxKly Moenxgx Euass ro M«nq I I�i Pr Jett Team Initiation Meeting BRC Meeting#2 BRC Meeting 93 �a Ld�a+ �4iw�566 Pac�al -v�.t xa a:a�nma 1�a�raxs stxoanx Inscnnxa5veeegu ;#A, ■ Staff Leadership Workshop #1 kf4rJ Key Stakeholders: Interview & Focus Groups M dia Event Launch {Optional) Ca unlTy Engag sment Web to fit Communitryy Initial Community Surrey Results Stakeholder Engagemem ReseT-4-th Analysis Plan _ OR Data Gathering Updawd and Background Indicators Research Analys;s Ciry Council Workshop. Core Values °e R Community Questionnaire 41 Care Values Quality of Life Master Plan CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 2021 © 0A k BRC Meeting il4 aeRi« a Pop-l1p Engagement Anivities (4ptionan Presentations '11" oR QMeeting #8 -Rxamna�tlxo4'�ry Ccval ;W,& • StaHLeadership Workshop It2 ■ am Community Questionnaire Implementation Ideas ---------------------------------------------------- Media Engagement C.—Un1 & Communi School -based Communi Workshops Webinars: Values Erg genre t ioolkit Curriculum & Engagement Workshops & Webinars (Optional) (Uptional} Implementation •Ideeas Com~iity Coro Education Vi-eli Co�iTy Engg gg ent En agement -uty Education Videotf2 Get Involved Find n's Findings New OLMP (Optional) Updated Indicators and Strategies Development Administrative Draft QLMP Core Values & Draft indi®tors Applied Development Economics I Page 3 ® i Ravia� Ciry Council With City Adoption Commissions Com unity Presentations: Draft OLMP (Optional) R QLMP Dashboard i a Einal Qi Version #2 - 121l8/20 COMMUNITY AND STAKEHOLDER OUTREACH MIG will design and carry out a series of community outreach approaches to gain input from key stakeholders and members of the community at large. These activities will be staged throughout the process to gain input early on about changes or additions needed to the QLMP as well as feedback later in the process as draft updates of QLMP elements are prepared. We recognize in the early stages of the process, Covid-19 may affect our ability to conduct in -person events and we will structure the activities to work on Zoom or other media as appropriate. The outreach approach will include a combination of the following elements: ■ Interviews of stakeholders in the areas of: economic development, real estate development, transportation, business, tourism, recreation, education, technology, and housing. ■ Two community polls and/or questionnaires ■ Conduct a City Council workshop to review the Core Values and understand priorities for policies and initiatives ■ Host four (4) community workshops through videoconference platforms and/or in -person events, as conditions allow TASK 3: COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT TOOLS MIG will develop the following tools for use in the Community Engagement Process. ■ Project Identity and Graphics ■ Project website and Database ■ A social media campaign conducted through the City's platforms, including a combination of organic postings that leverage community partners' social networks, as well as paid postings that target hard -to -reach or under -represented demographics ■ A short informational video that inspires interest and draw people into the process IDENTIFY IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES When the BRC and community input on Core Values and indicators is complete, MIG will facilitate a second Staff Leadership Workshop to discuss implementation. For each objective, ADE/MIG will assist City Staff in the development of a prioritized list of action items, including a timeline for completion and staff and other resource requirements. ADE/MIG will review the recommended priorities with the BRC, in light of input received through the community engagement process as well as technical input from City staff, to ensure that the QLMP reflects the community interests. Applied Development Economics I Page 4 TASK 4: RESEARCH AND DATA DEVELOPMENT ADE will update the data used to measure progress for each of the indicators in the QLMP. As noted in Tasks 1 and 2, MIG will facilitate a Staff leadership Workshop at the outset of the process and ADE/MIG will interview department personnel to obtain information on current issues with delivery of services as necessary to complete the Scan. For other indicators we will update data from secondary data sources, including the 2019 SCAG Community Profile for Temecula. Part of this update will also involve reviewing existing reports and plans such as the Youth Master Plan; Cultural Arts Master Plan; Old Town Visioning; Sustainability Program documents; Parks and Recreation Master Plan; and others as necessary. TASK 5: DRAFT AND FINAL QUALITY OF LIFE MASTER PLAN ADE/MIG will draft the updated QLMP for review by City staff and the BRC. ADE/MIG will facilitate a discussion of the format for the QLMP document to determine if a new format is warranted. As part of this discussion, MIG will provide options for posting an interactive version of the QLMP, and/or a dashboard for the indicators, on the City's website (budget is optional as indicated below). Following review of the Draft QLMP by City staff and the BRC, ADE/MIG will prepare a public review draft for presentation to the community, City Commissions and the City Council. MIG will facilitate workshops to present the Draft QLMP to the public and to the City commissions including Planning, Community Services, Public Traffic Safety, REDI, and the Old Town Local Review Board. ADE/MIG will address comments received in the public review process and prepare a Draft Final QLM for consideration by the City Council. ADE/MIG will present the Final Draft QLMP to the City Council, along with a description of the process used to prepare the document. ADE/MIG will prepare a final Draft QLMP to reflect revisions requested by the City Council. MIG will also provide a dashboard version of the QLMP on the City's website. BUDGET PROPOSAL The ADE/MIG Team proposes to complete the QLMP update for a not -to -exceed price of $192,555, which includes a 10% contingency. The table below shows the staff time commitment and budget by task. Additional detail for the MIG staff may be found in the tables below, along with prices for optional activities the City may wish to include beyond the base budget. Task 1. Project Initiation and Management Svensson 00 00 25 Cheng $150.00 MIG 1 142 Expenses Total $27,220 2. Community Engagement Activities 28 347 $1,600 $54,465 3. Community Engagement Tools 151 $26,055 4. Research and Data Development 16 40 $9,200 5. Report and Presentations 68 163 $1,765 $58,110 Total Hours 137 40 803 Total Base Budget $27,400 $6,000 $138,285 $3,365 $175,050 Contingency 10% 17 505 Total Budget $192,555 Applied Development Economics I Page 5 The following table shows MIG staff hours and costs. The last table shows additional direct costs for MIG and the MIG total budget for each task. Esmeraida Garcia Andy .. Danyel Cisneros Joey Nielsen Project Manager/ Communications Creative Director Graphic Designer MIG Outreach Associate Tasks ChargePrincipal-in- Outreach Lead & Marketing Director Total Professional i Fees Task 1: Project Initiation and Management 1.1 Project Initiation Meeting 4 $900 6 $1,050 6 $900 0 $0 0 $0 6 $510 22 $3,360 Community Education 1.2 and Engagement Plan 2 $450 6 $1,050 4 $600 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,020 24 $3,120 and Update Project Team Meetings 1.3 and Management (Bi- 8 $1,800 32 $5,600 4 $600 0 $0 0 $0 8 $680 52 $8,680 Weekly) 1.4 Staff Leadership Workshops 2 12 $2,700 16 $2,800 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 16 $1,360 44 $6,860 Subtotal Task 2: Community 26 $5,850 60 $10,500 14 $2,100 0 $0 0 $0 42 $3,570 142 $22,020 Engagement 2.1 Blue Ribbon Committee 12 $2,700 48 $8,400 2 $300 0 $0 0 $0 60 $5,100 122 $16,500 Meetings 6 2.2 City Council Workshop 6 $1,350 8 $1,400 2 $300 0 $0 0 $0 12 $1,020 28 $4,070 2.3 Stakeholder Interviews 1 $225 24 $4,200 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 8 $680 33 $5,105 & Focus Groups 15 2.4 Questionnaires (2) 2 $450 8 $1,400 0 $0 2 $300 4 $340 24 $2,040 40 $4,530 2.5 Community Workshops 2 $450 40 $7,000 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 60 $5,100 102 $12,550 & Webinars 4 2.6 Community Engagement 2 $450 4 $700 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 16 $1,360 22 $2,510 Reports (2) Subtotal 3: Community 25 $5,625 132 $23,100 4 $600 2 $300 4 $340 180 $15,300 347 $45,265 ToolsTask Engagement 3.1 Project Identity and Graphics 2 $ 450 4 $ 700 6 $900 16 $2,400 16 $1,360 4 $340 48 $6,150 Applied Development Economics I Page 6 Esmerai.. Garcia Andy Pendoley Ann Berchtold Aaron Ishaeik Danyel Cisneros Joey Nielsen Project Manager/ Communications Creative Director Graphic Designer Outreach Associate MIG ChargePrincipal-in- • ..Total DirectorProfessional i Hrs@ :. :: 3.2 Project Website and Database 2 $450 4 $700 4 $600 8 $1,200 4 $600 8 $680 16 $1,360 42 $4,990 33 $3,775 3.3 Social Media Calendar 1 $225 2 $350 6 $900 8 $680 12 $1,020 and Postings 3.4 Educational Video 2 $450 2 $350 8 $1,200 12 $1,800 4 $340 0 $0 28 $4,140 Subtotal 7 $1,575 12 $2,100 24 $3,600 40 $6,000 36 $3,060 32 $2,720 151 $19,055 Task 5: Draft and Final • . ftAdministrative Dra 5.1 2 $450 8 $1,400 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 0 $0 10 $1,850 LMP 5.2 Draft QLMP - Public 4 $900 8 $1,400 4 $600 4 $600 12 $1,020 0 $0 32 $4,520 Review 5.3 Final QLMP and Brochure 2 $450 8 $1,400 4 $600 4 $600 24 $2,040 8 $680 50 $5,770 Design and Build $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $0 $0 0 $0 Dashboard - QLMP 5.4 City Commission Presentations 2 2 $450 30 $5,250 0 $0 2 $300 4 $340 12 $1,020 50 $7,360 5.5 City Council Presentation 1 $225 8 $1,400 0 $0 0 $0 4 $340 8 $680 21 $2,645 Subtotal 11 $2,475 62 $10,850 8 $1,200 10 $1,500 44 $3,740 28 $2,380 163 $22,145 •. . includedTotal) 2 A Project Launch & Media 2 $450 6 $1,050 12 $1,800 2 $300 4 $340 8 $680 34 $4,620 Event 23 Pop -Up Engagement 1 $225 8 $1,400 2 $300 0 $0 4 $340 16 $1,360 31 $3,625 Activities 1 3.A Educational Video 2 $450 2 $350 8 $1,200 12 $1,800 4 $340 0 $0 28 $4,140 33 Engagement Toolkit 1 $225 4 $700 4 $600 0 $0 0 $0 16 $1,360 25 $2,885 Applied Development Economics I Page 7 Profes- sional. Fees and MIG Total Costs, including Direct Costs (From Video Task 1: Project Initiation and Management 1.1 Project Initiation Meeting $3,360 $0 Professional Direct Fees Costs $0 $3,360 1.2 Community Education and Engagement Plan and Update $3,120 $0 $0 $3,120 1.3 Project Team Meetings and Management (Bi-Weekly) $8,680 $0 $0 $8,680 1.4 Staff Leadership Workshops (2) $6,860 $22,020 $0 $0 $200 $200 $7,060 $22,220 Subtotal Task 2.1 2: Community Engagement Activities Blue Ribbon Committee Meetings (6) City Council Workshop Stakeholder Interviews & Focus Groups (15) Questionnaires (2) Community Workshops & Webinars (4) Community Engagement Reports (2) Subtotal $16,500 $0 $800 $17,300 2.2 $4,070 $0 $200 $4,270 2.3 $5,105 $0 $100 $5,205 2.4 $4,530 $400 $0 $4,930 2.5 $12,550 $0 $500 $13,050 2.6 $2,510 $0 $0 $2,510 $45,265 $400 $1,600 $47,265 3.1 ToolsTask 3: Community Engagement 1 Project Identity and Graphics Project Website and Database $6,150 $0 $0 $6,150 3.2 $4,990 $2,000 $0 $6,990 3.3 Social Media Calendar and Postings $3,775 $0 $0 $3,775 3.4 Educational Video $4,140 $5,000 $0 $9,140 Subtotal Task 5: Draft and Final QLMP 5.1 Administrative Draft QLMP $19,055 $1,850 $7,000 $0 $0 $0 $26,055 $1,850 5.2 Draft QLMP - Public Review $4,520 $0 $0 $4,520 5.3 Final QLMP and Brochure $5,770 $0 $0 $5,770 Design and Build Dashboard - QLMP $0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 5.4 City Commission Presentations (2) $7,360 $0 $500 $7,860 5.5 City Council Presentation $2,645 $0 $100 $2,745 Subtotal $22,145 $0 $600 $42,745 TOTALFINAL •.Total) 2.A Project Launch & Media Event 2.B Pop -Up Engagement Activities (1) 0: 00 $0 $2,400 $200 $4,820 $0 $300 $3,925 3.A Additional Educational Video $5,000 $0 $9,140 3.B Engagement Toolkit $0 $500 $3,385 Applied Development Economics I Page 8 a The Heart of Southern California Wine Country Quality of Life Master Plan CITY OF TEMECULA COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 2021 ��•�� AM; • ��� • • 000 • L�i"J 4impi • ��� • li"i • 000 • 4i"J 0 000 • L��?J • • L�i"J • Recruit and Select BRC Meeting #1 BRC Meeting #2 BRC Meeting #3 BRC Meeting #4 BRC Meeting #5 BRC Meeting #6 Bllue Ribbon ue m I Process Ove view Updated Data and Community Engagement Indicators Indicators Updated Values 4, 5 & 6: Potential -Values 7: Potential Indicators & Strategies Initial Implementation Ideas & Prioritization Draft QLMP Recommend to City Review Members - Stakeholders and - Values 1, 2, & 3: Potential Issue Areas Indicators & Strategies Indicators & Strategies - City Vision Council with City Commissions • • — — — IN (Bi-weekly Meetings Across the Process) • �i v1W : :`: IT�I` j__4 Project Team Initiation Meeting Staff Leadership Workshop #1 City Council Workshop: Core Pop -Up Engagement Activities Staff Leadership Workshop #2 y y •r�•�r•�jr Values (Optional) 0000 • Community Presentations: 4TV A _ A � •rrriir A =� Draft QLMP (Optional) �R Key Stakeholders: Community Community Community Interview & Focus Questionnaire #1 Presentations Questionnaire #2: Groups Core Values Implementation Ideas 4W;MOL so* Media Event Launch Launch Social fir (Optional) Community Media Engagement Engagement Community Community School -based Website Workshops & Engagement Curriculum & Webinars: Values Toolkit Engagement (Optional) (Optional) Lam► / �/r Community Community 130mmuni M11 Community Education Video#1: Engagement Survey Results Stakeholder Engagement Get Involved Findings (True North Analysis Plan Research) r� r r Data Gathering Updated and Background Indicators Research Analysis Updated Indicators and Strategies Development Core Values & indicators •——————— — — — — —— .--_1111111- * • •* . •* . • ire%� ire Community Workshops & Webinars: Implementation Ideas �Ir • Community Community Engagement Education Video#2: Findings New QLMP (Optional) Administrative Draft QLMP Draft © MA 000 Ah Ah All City Council Adoption QLMP Dashboard (Optional) 12 Final QLMP Version #2 - 12/18/20 Blue Ribbon Committee Quality of Life Master Plan Update The following list was created by the General Plan Update Subcommittee consisting of Mayor Maryann Edwards, and Mayor Pro-Tem, Matt Rahn. The final list will be presented for consideration by the full City Council on April 27, 2021 as part of the QLMP Update contract. 1. Mayor, Maryann Edwards (General Plan Update Subcommittee) 2. Mayor Pro-Tem, Matt Rahn (General Plan Update Subcommittee) 3. Lanae Turley-Trejo (Planning Commission) 4. Ross Jackson (Old Town Local Review Board) 5. David Matics (Public/Traffic Safety Commission) 6. Kathy Sizemore (Community Services Commission) 7. Denyse Wilson (REDI Commission) 8. Principal or Superintendent (Rancho Christian Schools) 9. Rabbi Rosenstein (Interfaith Council) 10. Roger Schulz (MSJC) 11. Representative (TV Hospital) 12. Representative (Chamber of Commerce) 13. Representative (Visit Temecula Valley) 14. Representative (Pechanga) 15. Representative (Camp Pendleton) 16. Tom Ainsworth (Caltrans) 17. Juan Carlos (Optiforms) 18. Representative (Social Work Action Group — SWAG) 19. Tammy Marine (Habitat for Humanity) 20. Teri Biancardi (Environment) 21. Carl Love (Local History) 22. Representative (Public Schools) In addition to the list above, staff will reach out to Yvette Martinez regarding a contact to represent the Special Needs community, and to local High Schools for a Sophomore or Junior interested in representing Youth on the Blue Ribbon Committee. Item No . 26 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of March 2021. RE -OPENING TRANSITION The Permit Center is now open to the public, with all services still available online. Staff has implemented a new queueing software, called Qless, that allows for mobile, audible, and visual notifications that expedite the public's access to in person services. The new software allows customers to further distance themselves by staying outside or six feet apart, without a concern for missing their spot in various Permit Center lines. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed 38 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted one (1) Public Hearing in March 2021. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type March 2021 Lang Range Projects 7 Development Plan 2 Extension of Time 1 Home Occupation Maps 1 Minor Exception Modifications 12 Pre -Application Sign Program 1 Wireless Antenna 1 Temporary Use Permit 1 Zoning 4 Total 66 Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Multi -Family Density Core (PA20-1219, 20-1459): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map for a 376-unit multi -family community consisting of townhomes, motorcourt duplexes, and bungalow 3-packs built on 31.49 acres. The project includes a paseo connecting the project to the recreation center and sports park, a dog run, play areas, parks, barbecue areas, bocce ball, and a ninja course. The project is located within Planning Areas 28 & 29 of Sommers Bend. (COOPER) Sommers Bend PA15 HPR (PA20-1454): The City is processing a Home Product Review for Planning Area 15 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for three (3) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 45 lots. Project is slated for the April 21, 2021 Planning Commission. (CARDENAS) Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PAs 20-1414, 20-1415, 20-1416): The City is processing Home Product Reviews for a total of 57 single family lots. This phase is located on the southern and eastern boundaries of the project, are the larger 20,000 square foot minimum lots and encompasses Planning Areas 19, 20B, and 21. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PA20-1461): The City is processing Home Product Review for a total of 115 single family lots located in Planning Area 17A. (COOPER) Sommers Bend Home Product Review (HPR) (PA20-1321): The City is processing Home Product Review for a total of 74 single family lots located in Planning Area 18A. (COOPER) Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Ave. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER) Remington Industrial Building (PA21-0384): The City is processing a Development Plan to construct an approximately 33,927 square foot industrial building located at on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Remington Avenue. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING Temporary Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: As the State of California and Riverside County Public Health loosen restrictions related to the COVID 19 pandemic, City Council has directed staff to implement multiple programs (Temecula Revive) that accelerate local economic activity while maintaining compliance with all State or County mandates. Staff has developed the Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program to assist businesses during these challenging times. On May 29, 2020, the City Council Old Town Steering Subcommittee received a presentation from staff regarding the proposed Temporary Expanded Dining/Retail program. Approximately 50 businesses have participated in the program throughout the City. Staff met with the subcommittee on March 17, 2021 and was directed to solicit input from Old Town to inform the subcommittee about future next steps. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is developing Objective Design Standards that will conform with SB 35, and will incorporate objective design guidelines into the City's Development Code. Staff has hired P1aceWorks, to assist with development of our design standards for multifamily and mixed use. On September 28, 2020, staff and Consultant presented six architectural styles to the PC Infill Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo. The Subcommittee agreed with staff s six recommended styles. On October 13, 2020, staff and Consultant presented to the CC Infill Subcommittee consisting of Council Member Naggar and Rahn, the six recommended architecture styles. The Council Members agreed with staffs recommendation to move forward with detailing the styles for the Objective Design Standards. Early December, the consultant provided staff with a first draft of the ODS document. Staff reviewed and provided comments/edits. Currently, the consultant is working through staff s comments from the "Final Draft" review. We anticipate one final review by staff prior to taking the item to the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design) of the project's scope of work. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for CEQA evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On February 22nd, Planning staff kicked off the project with F&P and Public Works. Currently, staff is working with F&P to compile GIS data. (PETERS, TOMA) General Plan Annual Progress Report for 2020 (LR21-0389): State law (Government Code Section 65400 and 65700) mandates that all cities and counties submit an annual report on the status of the General Plan progress in its implementation to their legislative bodies, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April 1 st of each year. The purpose of the General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP -APR) is to update the community, City Council, HCD and OPR on General Plan implementation progress. This report is also used as an aid to identify prospective changes, or updates that may be needed for the General Plan. Furthermore, the City has an adopted and certified Housing Element for the period of 2014 to 2021 and pursuant to Government Code Section 65400, is required to prepare and submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Department. The APR includes information on the jurisdiction's progress in addressing the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), including the number of housing units permitted by income level, number of units entitled, and the status of programs identified within the Housing Element. As required by law, the 2020 Housing Element Annual Progress Report will be submitted to HCD on April 1, 2021. Per state law, the item has to be heard at a public meeting, the item has been placed on the City Council consent calendar as a receive and file for April 27, 2021. There are no penalties for resubmitting the annual progress report past the April 1 st date if the City Council wishes to revise the report. (TOMA) Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. (TOMA) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. CHW will apply for funding through the State in 2021. An amendment to the Loan Agreement is anticipated for the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. A tax allocation application forwarded to the state in March, 2021. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. A tax allocation application forwarded to the state in March, 2021. (WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tem Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies. Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. (RABIDOU, TOMA, PETERS) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP): Pre -applications are open for the City of Temecula Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP). This program will provide rental and mortgage assistance to those eligible recipients who were negatively impacted by COVID-19. Pre -applications will close on April 9, 2021 at 5 p.m. (WATSON) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for March 2021 are highlighted in the following table. Building & Safety Statistics March 2021 Permits 433 New Single Family Units 66 New Commercial Building 0 Photovoltaic 134 Tenant Improvements 6 Non Construction C of D 28 Number of Active Plan Checks 109 Number of New Plan Checks 88 Number of Finaled Permits 281 Inspections 3,425 Inspections Per Day 149.0 Inspections Per Person Per Day 37.2 Stops Per Month 1007.0 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 sf) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf) • Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester • Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf) • Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf) • Temecula Valley Lexus Dealership (54,898 sf) • At Home (113,903 sf) Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy • Innovative Packaging Solutions (19,567 sf) • Stichich, Women's Retail (6,427 sf) • PodTronix (9,984 sf) Tenant Improvement • BioPro LLC 43214 Black Deer Loop • Flip Flop Shop — 40754 Winchester, Building F, Suite 300 • Simon's Dole Whip — 27636 Ynez Road Suite L-1 • Evolution Chiropractic & Wellness 31333 Temecula Parkway #140 CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of March, Code Enforcement responded to 183 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 247 code cases, 406 weed abatement cases, conducted 1,347 inspections, and forwarded 45 referrals. Type of Code Case I March2M I Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 2 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance /Infestation/ Mold 2 Business or Home Occupation w/o license/CUP 8 Trash and Debris/ Dumping 34 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 7 Green Pool / Vector Control / Stagnant Water o Graffiti 86 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 17 Trailer/ RV Stored/Boat/Parking 17 Construction w/o Pe rm it/Bu i I d i ng Code 24 Encroach Public ROW/Trash Cans 16 Zoning/Signs 23 Public Safety & Health 11 Total Number of Cases 247 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreckmawe Tracking I March 2021 Residential - Default 12 Residential - Foreclosure 23 Residential - REG 20 Total - Residential 5S Commercial - Default Commercial - Foreclosure 1 Commercial - REO Total - Commercial 7;;G ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0349 28072 Calle Bonita 944-332-010 Jaime Cardenas 03/01/2021 03/08/2021 Joe Gigantino Sr PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: One Bet Draw Poker LLC: a home occupation business license for the selling and marketing of a new casino game table invention. PA21-0350 33547Abbey Rd 966-150-011 Eric Jones 03/01/2021 Peter Frazier Racheal Allen PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Abbey Road Minor Modification (Planning Review Only): A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow the third car garage at an existing single-family residence to be converted into a bedroom with attached bathroom. The project is located at 33547 Abbey Road. PA21-0354 922-034-022 Scott Cooper 03/03/2021 Matt Liesemeyer TV Old Town LP PL Extension of Plan Review Time Case Title / Description: 4th St. Hotel EOT (DP): The first Extension of Time for a previously approved Development Plan (PA17-0854) for a four-story hotel with underground parking. The fourth floor is designated as residential condominium units as required by the Old Town Specific Plan. The project proposes the option of developing the fourth floor as hotel guest rooms if the Old Town Specific Plan is amended to allow for a four-story hotel outside of the hotel overlay district. The project is located approximately 50 feet southwest of Mercedes Street on the south side of 4th Street. PA21-0356 909-290-003 Scott Cooper 03/04/2021 04/07/2021 Josh Barrett MS -Mountain PL Modifications Approved View, LLC Case Title / Description: MS Mountain View - Basin MOD: A Modification to Parcel Map 21382 for the construction of a master bioretention basin on Parcel 3 to serve Parcels 4 through 9 and 53 through 58 for storm water drainage and water quality purposes located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado approximately 370 feet west of Terra Alta Way (APN: 909-290-003) PA21-0357 40435 Winchester Rd 910-290-016 Jaime Cardenas 03/04/2021 03/15/2021 Francisco Winco Foods PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Santizo Case Title / Description: Winco Light MOD: a Modification Application to retrofit the existing parking lot light to LEDs for WinCo Foods located at 40435 Winchester Road. PA21-0359 42061 Majestic Ct 965-041-009 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2021 03/09/2021 Katrina Zaleski PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Katrina Zaleski Psychotherapist: a home occupation business license for telehealth therapy services. Page 1 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0360 32482 Rosa Ct 955-442-019 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2021 03/09/2021 Mustafa PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Haidermota Occupation Case Title / Description: Haidermota, Inc: a home occupation business license for bookkeeping services. PA21-0361 32938 Romero Dr 960-103-006 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2021 03/09/2021 Ryan Maciel PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: 031-lundo Bassin Kayak Guide: a home occupation business license for fishing guide services. PA21-0364 42797 Twilight Ct 944-252-006 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2021 03/09/2021 Carol PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Destacamento Occupation Case Title / Description: The Spirited Mermaid: a home occupation business license for the sale of handcrafted art. PA21-0366 31173 Strawberry Tree Ln 961-457-045 Jaime Cardenas 03/05/2021 03/09/2021 Marcus Burton PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Twiinstar: a home occupation business license for social media production with a focus in fashion. PA21-0369 43165 Sereno Dr 959-332-016 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2021 03/09/2021 Veronica Lawson PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Diacono Leather: a home occupation business license for handcrafted leather goods sales. PA21-0374 40431 Charlesburg Dr 916-641-043 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2021 03/09/2021 Shawn Dennstedt PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Temecula Pallet Solutions Inc: a home occupation business license for pallet recycling and distribution. PA21-0376 46332 Koh inoor Way 962-381-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2021 03/09/2021 Rachel Goyette PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Tenacious Endurance LLC: a home occupation business license for online athletics coaching services. PA21-0377 41704 Margarita Rd , Apt. 58 921-810-010 Jaime Cardenas 03/08/2021 03/09/2021 Vincent Gajewski PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 III Occupation Case Title / Description: ITSOKAY LLC: a home occupation business license for music production and sales. Page 2 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0378 42368 Rio Nedo 909-254-010 Jaime Cardenas 03/09/2021 03/22/2021 Ariel Washington TIMOTHY BAL PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 42368 Rio Nedo ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 42368 Rio Nedo Road (909-254-010). PA21-0379 44989 Checkerbloom Dr 961-420-011 Jaime Cardenas 03/09/2021 04/05/2021 Baldwin REYNALDO PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Madriaga BOLO Case Title / Description: Bolo Residence Addition: a Modification Application for a 103 square -foot addition to the north side of the existing single family home located at 44989 Checkerbloom Drive. PA21-0380 28381 Vincent Moraga Dr 921-281-021 Jaime Cardenas 03/09/2021 03/11/2021 Elizabeth Thiet Nguyen PL Zoning or Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Johnson Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 28381 Vincent Moraga Road: a zoning verification letter form the property located at 28381 Vincent Moraga Road. PA21-0382 42380 Zevo Dr 909-360-026 Jaime Cardenas 03/10/2021 Ariel Pepper MAISA ONE PL Wireless Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Antenna Facility Case Title / Description: 42380 Zevo T-Mobile MOD: a modification application for T-Mobile to modify the existing wireless facility by installing nine (9) antennas, six (6) RRHs, nine (9) power -fiber hybrid cables, a voltage booster and new cabinet at 42380 Zevo Drive. PA21-0384 42398 Remington Ave 909-370-044 Scott Cooper 03/10/2021 Glen Daigle RemTem PL Development Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Development, LP Plan Case Title / Description: Remington Industrial DP: A Development Plan to construct an approximately 33,927 square foot industrial building located at on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Remington Avenue PA21-0386 31830 Corte Sagunto 955-284-006 Jaime Cardenas 03/10/2021 03/17/2021 Kayla Throop PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Throop Enterprises LLC: a home occupation business license for wine country shuttle services. PA21-0391 41455 Bellerive Ct 953-532-020 Jaime Cardenas 03/11/2021 03/12/2021 Anique Mautner PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Mautner Communications: a home occupation business license for marketing consulting services. PA21-0401 45549 Jaguar Way 961-372-017 Jaime Cardenas 03/12/2021 03/12/2021 Luz Angulo PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Luz M. Angulo RDHAP: a home occupation business license for mobile dental services. Page 3 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0403 32599Angelo Dr 955-473-011 Scott Cooper 03/12/2021 03/19/2021 Brian Tidd PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Premier Construction Management Group - A Home Occupation Business License for a construction home office PA21-0405 39784 Roripaugh Rd 920-141-004 Scott Cooper 03/12/2021 03/19/2021 Shelly Van Hanja PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: CPRfundraising.com - A Home Occupation Business License for online fund raising services PA21-0406 41943 Shorewood Ct 921-591-007 Scott Cooper 03/12/2021 03/19/2021 DAVID PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 TOWNSEND Occupation Case Title / Description: NoWankerWines Co. LLC - A Home Occupation Business License for online clothing sales PA21-0407 27304 Prescott Way 916-682-006 Scott Cooper 03/12/2021 03/19/2021 Stephen Wilson PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Memento Mori Investments LLC - A Home Occupation Business License for residential real estate services PA21-0409 964-630-005 Scott Cooper 03/15/2021 Dena Upp escrow acct WOODSIDE 05S PL Minor Out 5074 authorized Exception user Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA17A ME: A Minor Exception to reduce the minimum rear yard setback on 23 lots (lots 1, 7, 10, 11, 13, 22, 30, 35, 37, 41, 46, 48, 49, 52, 54, 55, 63, 65, 70, 72, 74, 104, 110) from 20'-0" down to a minimum of 17'-0" which is a 15% reduction allowed by the Minor Exception. PA21-0412 39948 Sweet Brier Cir 920-170-008 Eric Jones 03/15/2021 David Greyshock David Greyshock PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Greyshock Residential Addition (Planning Review Only): A Modification application (Planning Review Only), to allow for a first and second story addition to an existing single-family residential unit located at 39948 Sweetbrier Circle. PA21-0413 30294 Calle Halcon 945-252-001 Jaime Cardenas 03/15/2021 03/25/2021 William Furlong John Diehl PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Diehl Patio MOD: a Modification Application for a proposed 324 square foot pavilion located at the rear of the existing property located at 30294 Calle Halcon. Page 4 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0414 30318 Deer Meadow Rd 919-362-037 Scott Cooper 03/15/2021 03/19/2021 Kevin Johnson PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: SoCal Tile & Grout Care - the and grout cleaning PA21-0416 30327 Pechanga Dr 922-342-029 Scott Cooper 03/15/2021 03/19/2021 Olga Salas PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Olga Salas Cleaning Services -A Home Occupation Business License for janitorial services PA21-0423 28120 Jefferson Ave 921-060-032 Eric Jones 03/16/2021 Mike Wardlaw JEAN PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 DOMENIGONI Case Title / Description: Broadmoor Place Modification Application (Planning Review Only): A Modification application for an existing commercial center to reconfigure an ADA parking space and make architectural revisions. The project is located at 28210 Jefferson Avenue. PA21-0428 31263 Via Nubes 961-450-070 Jaime Cardenas 03/17/2021 03/23/2021 Savanna Cilingir PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Soul Bound Beauty LLC: a home occupation business license for online retail sales cosmetics and clothing. PA21-0429 31717 Calle Redondela 955-282-008 Jaime Cardenas 03/17/2021 03/23/2021 Steven Preyer PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Fixed Focus Inspections: a home occupation business license for residential inspections. PA21-0431 43190 Lancashire Common Jaime Cardenas 03/17/2021 03/23/2021 Clemente PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Ambrosano Occupation Case Title / Description: Ambro Electric: a home occupation business license for electrical contracting services. PA21-0433 40710 Winchester Rd 910-420-029 Jaime Cardenas 03/18/2021 Seritage PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Dick's Sporting Goods: a Modification Application for a major modification to the westerly facade of the former Sears store to incorporate a new design for the new tenant, Dicks Sporting Goods located at 40710 Winchester Road. PA21-0442 29825 Santiago Rd 922-130-016 Jaime Cardenas 03/22/2021 Shirley Ruiz Reliance Church PL Zoning or Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Reliance Church ZL: a zoning Letter for the property located at 29825 Santiago Road. Page 5 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0443 27973 Diaz Rd 921-040-003 Jaime Cardenas 03/22/2021 PRECISION PL Maps Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 PHOTOGRAPHY INC Case Title / Description: Wiens Building Condo Map (PA for tracking CC&Rs Only): This planning application was created for CC&R tracking purposes of a proposed subdivision of APN 921-040-003 with five industrial buildings into condominiums. PA21-0447 27500 Jefferson Ave 910-310-007 Jaime Cardenas 03/25/2021 Ron Davison Heritage Inn of PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Temecula, LLC Case Title / Description: Staybridge Tesla EV Charging MOD: a modification application (Planning Review Only) for the installation of seven (7) electric vehicle charging stations on the parking stalls of Staybridge Suites Hotel located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. PA21-0448 27393 Ynez Rd 921-260-018 Jaime Cardenas 03/25/2021 04/06/2021 phillip lindstrom Heritage PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Partners Case Title / Description: 27393 & 27403 Ynez Fence MOD: a modification application to fence in the perimeter of the buildings located at 27393 Ynez and 27403 Ynez Road. PA21-0449 960-030-013 Scott Cooper 03/25/2021 Kevin Zenk CRAIG SWARTS PL Development Plan Review Plan Case Title / Description: Wolf Store Rd. Ralph's Fuel Station DP: A Development Plan for a nine (9) dispenser fuel station that includes a 174 square foot kiosk located on the southwest corner of Wolf Store Road and Butterfield Stage Road. PA21-0450 42440 Moraga Rd 944-290-021 Jaime Cardenas 03/25/2021 03/29/2021 Taryn Johnson TEMECULA PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92592 RIDGE LTD Planning Letter PARTNERSHIP Case Title / Description: Temecula Ridge Apartment Homes ZL: a zoning verification letter for the apartment property with Assessor's parcel Number 944-290-021. PA21-0452 28410 Old Town Front St 922-023-019 Jaime Cardenas 03/29/2021 Ronda Arend OTP FRONT PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: Shake and Shop TUP: a Temporary Use Permit application to raise funds and awareness for the Salvation Foundation from 6pm-9pm on April 16, 2021 at the parking lot outside of 28410 Old Town Front Street, Suite 107. PA21-0453 30218 Santiago Rd 945-080-024 Brandon Rabidou 03/29/2021 03/29/2021 Kara Stone PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Wild Skyes - a home occupation business license to conduct retail services. Page 6 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0455 27230 Madison Ave 910-272-003 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 Bender Sign Bender Sign MADISON PL Sign Program Cancelled Temecula, CA 92590 Company Company AVENUE ASSOC Case Title / Description: Madison Freeway Park Sign Program Amendment: a sign program amendment to modify the sign placement areas for the buildings located at 27230 Madison Avenue. PA21-0456 41695 Big Sage Ct Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 03/30/2021 Guadalupe Silva PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Dario Cuevas: a home occupation business license for handyman services. PA21-0457 32239 Via Bejarano 959-341-027 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 03/30/2021 Robert Scholten PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Robert Daniel Scholten Properties: a home occupation business license for residential design and build investments. PA21-0458 28895 Vallejo Ave 922-130-007 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 03/30/2021 Scott Partridge PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Partridge Equestrian Farms: a home occupation business license for horse boarding. PA21-0459 28895 Vallejo Ave 922-130-007 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 03/30/2021 Scott Partridge PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Ranch and Fields Tractor Service: a home occupation business license for tractor services. PA21-0460 921-330-052 Scott Cooper 03/30/2021 Sean Illes Case Title / Description: Solana Assisted Living Courtyards MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to a previously approved Development Plan (PA19-0940) to update the beautification of the interior courtyard elements for the project located on the southeast corner of Margarita Road and Solana Way. Temecula RCFE PL Modifications Plan Review Group, LLC PA21-0461 42374 Avenida Alvarado 909-253-024 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 Tony ALVARADO PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Chotibhongs INDUSTRIAL 6 Case Title / Description: Wencor Entry MOD: A Modification Application to create a new building entry for the Wencor Building located at 42374 Avenida Alvarado. PA21-0462 43276 Camino Caruna 955-341-014 Jaime Cardenas 03/30/2021 03/30/2021 Edith Diaz PI -Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Precision Management Enterprise LLC: a home occupation business license for virtual assistant services. Page 7 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0463 42375 Remington Ave 909-370-036 Jaime Cardenas 03/31/2021 Yegesh 5670 PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Wickramsinghe TEMECULA Use Permit Case Title / Description: Scott's Storage Containers TUP: a Temporary Use Permit application to allow for eight (8) storage containers to be placed on the north side of Scott's Company parking lot located at 42375 Remington Avenue. PA21-0465 42499 Garcia Way 955-481-018 Scott Cooper 03/31/2021 04/02/2021 Sidney Handy PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: Fat Pleasures Bakery - A Home Occupation Business License for home bakery services. PA21-0466 28886 Kennebunk Ct 916-441-002 Scott Cooper 03/31/2021 04/02/2021 Jonathan St. PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 John Occupation Case Title / Description: Changing -Paths Inc. -A Home Occupation Business License for online and phone coaching and training consulting services. PA21-0475 45774 Corte Mislanca 962-352-011 Scott Cooper 03/31/2021 04/02/2021 Linda Georgian PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Occupation Case Title / Description: L Georgian Consulting- A Home Occupation Business License for health care consulting services. PA21-0476 39930Amberley Cir 957-163-012 Scott Cooper 03/31/2021 04/02/2021 Eric Cox PL Home Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Occupation Case Title / Description: Inspired by the Vine -A Home Occupation Business License for online craft sales. PREAPP 26478 Ynez Rd 910-320-048 Eric Jones 03/02/2021 03/11/2021 Hannibal Petrossi FD TEMECULA PL Completed 21-0352 Temecula, CA 92591 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Temecula Express Car Wash Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow for the review of an express car wash located at 26487 Ynez Road. PREAPP 41955 Main St 922-034-028 Jaime Cardenas 03/03/2021 Phillip Moore TEMECULA PL Plan Review 21-0353 Temecula, CA 92590 HILLS WINERY Pre -Application AT VILLA DI CALABRO Case Title / Description: Rust Belt Pre-App: a Pre -Application for a proposed modification to the site and buildings located at 41955 Main Street to convert the Calabro wine tasting facility into a restaurant. PREAPP 922-024-002 Jaime Cardenas 03/10/2021 03/25/2021 Cheryl Miller CLAY SIDES PL Completed 21-0385 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Gardenladys: a pre -application for a proposed garden hosting workshops at the vacant with Assessor's Parcel Number 922-024-002. Page 8 of 9 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PREAPP 42079 Roick Dr 909-321-001 Eric Jones 03/15/2021 03/30/2021 Joseph Skimming Regency PL Completed 21-0410 Temecula, CA 92590 Investments Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Dental Office Shell Building Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a proposed two-story shell building intended for a dental office use. The project totals approximately 6,936 square feet and is located on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Roick Drive. PREAPP 31670 Rancho California Rd 953-090-028 Eric Jones 03/15/2021 03/30/2021 Leonard Urquiza LANXING PL Completed 21-0411 Temecula, CA 92591 INVESTMENT Pre -Application LLC Case Title / Description: Tentative Tract Map Pre -Application: A Pre -Application for a proposed Tentative Tract Map comprised of twelve lots totaling approximately 2.67 acres. The project is generally located approximately 1,700 feet west of the Butterfield Stage Road and Rancho California Road intersection. PREAPP 29540 Rancho California Rd 921-320-061 Eric Jones 03/16/2021 03/30/2021 George Ray NEW WORLD PL Completed 21-0418 Temecula, CA 92591 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Claim Jumper Site Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow the review of two restaurant structures totaling approximately 5,946 square feet proposed for the former Claim Jumper site. The project is located at 29540 Rancho California Road. PREAPP 910-272-014 Scott Cooper 03/25/2021 Beau Brand PL Out 21-0446 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Jefferson/Buecking Apartments Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a 330-unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection. PREAPP 28613 Pujol St 922-054-011 Eric Jones 03/31/2021 Kate Du U2 LLC PL Plan Review 21-0473 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: JMK Development Plan Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a proposed eight -unit townhouse project located at 28613 Pujol Street. Page 9 of 9 Item No . 27 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: Wendy Miller, Administrative Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly Report City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Service Calls Incident Type i March 2021 Commercial Fire 1 .� 0 T E111Ecr r- ► , False Alarms 73 Haz Mat 0 Ire• ` _ 4-9 V��Y go 01 1989 74ONSINEW OVV _N�' ! • • • ti � • r'' 00 • •. 4�.r as - • • z • • • • • '�, tw ,.e. nb� fco •'.. • 7• •• • ,r .Axe. r ��F �-• � '»• � • � PALBA vALier � I>tiy � r J' ry �� • • •• A . ge I' r i •• _• • r 1 "Y� sf. • • • :F"t •• _ Apo .Ilion lip I Medical 553 Other Fire 7 Other Misc 7 Public Assist 29 Res Fire 1 Rescue 1 Ringing Alarm 2 Standby 11 Traffic Collision 58 WildlandNehicle 5 Fire k Total 748 City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections Of TEn�EC,a — March 2021 Plan Review and Inspections March Year to Date .� Plan Review 446 1065 eb 1989 � Construction Inspections 334 819 +NEW pV'?O Annual Inspections 590 1527 City of Temecula Fire Department Welcome T-73 TEME2021 KME Ladder Truck G ' 40 '0 1989 !jr Item No . 28 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (March 2021) PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of March 2021. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 8,001 "Priority One" calls for service 68 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 5.60 VOLUNTEERS Chaplain 15 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 837 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 23 Explorer 94 Station/Administration 51 Total Volunteer hours 1020 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 241 Fingerprints/Live Scans 122 Police reports filed 3 Citations signed off 5 Total receipts $2,904 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings 4 Safety presentations/Training 0 Special events 0 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 1 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours 0 Planning Review Projects 2 Temp Outdoor Use Permits 0 SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM) On sight felony arrests 1 On sight misdemeanor arrests 13 Felony arrest warrants served 5 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 78 Area Checks 99 Camp Checks 55 Pedestrian Checks 67 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks... 24 Outreach attempts / Success... 9/7 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team) On sight felony arrests 31 On sight misdemeanor arrests 25 Felony arrest warrants served 4 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 13 Follow-up investigations / search warrants 17 Parole/Probation Searches 0 Pedestrian Checks 0 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 13 Marijuana Dispensary Checks 1 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team) On sight felony arrests 7 On sight misdemeanor arrests 26 Felony arrest warrants served 17 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 38 Bar checks 36 Business checks 10 D.U.I. Arrests... 6 Traffic citations... 176 **The Metro District Team Began Operations on 03/11/2021** TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 1169 Non -hazardous citations 172 Parking citations 93 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 47 Seatbelts 9 Cell Phone Cites 221 Injury collisions 20 D.U.I. Arrests 41 Grant funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints / Saturation enforcement 1 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket 0 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 141 Total Cases Assigned 47 Total Cases Closed 31 Search Warrants prepared/served 23 Arrests 7 Out of Custody Filings 6 PROMENADE MALL TEAM Calls for service 107 Felony arrest/filings 4 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 9 Traffic Citations 0 Fingerprints/Live Scans 382 Total receipts $4,777 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 1 Misdemeanor arrests 0 Reports 4 Citations 1 Meetings/Presentations 134 Incident summaries: Calls for Service: Officers responded to 8,001 calls for service in March 2021. Below is a snapshot of those calls. This is not a comprehensive list. Please be mindful these calls can range from several minutes to several hours, to investigate at the patrol level. Many of these investigations are forwarded to the Detective Bureau for even further investigation and follow-up. Call Type Number of Calls Call Type Number of Calls Arson 2 Hazard 4 Assault with a Deadly Weapon 10 Homeless Outreach 14 Battery (Fights) 42 Illegal Dumping 3 Burglary -Commercial 17 Indecent Exposure 3 Burglary -Residential 17 Juvenile -incorrigible 12 Burglary -Vehicle 49 Juvenile -Run Away 51 Child Abuse 4 Juvenile -Located 12 Domestic Violence Abuse 29 Juvenile -Medical Aid 9 Fraud 36 K9 Uses 88 Homicide Keep the Peace 43 Rape 4 Mail Theft 8 Robbery 13 Marijuana Cultivation Theft- PettyUnder $950 111 Mentally Disturbed Person 5150 51 Theft -Grand (over $950) 33 Missing Adult or Child 19 Narcotics Violations 91 Person Down 18 Alarm -Audible 370 Prowler 7 Alarm -Robbery Receiving Stolen Property Alarm -Silent 6 Restraining Order Violation 7 Animal Cruelty 4 Sex Offender Registrants 1 Annoying Phone Calls 16 Sexual Battery 5 Area Checks 1746 Shooting at a Dwelling 6 Assist Other Department 125 Stolen Vehicle 42 Brandishing a Firearm 4 Stolen Vehicle Recovery 15 Check the Welfare 184 Suicide threat 17 Child Stealing 16 Suspicious Person 144 Criminal Threats 3 Suspicious Vehicle 69 Disoriented Subject 12 Trespassing 102 Disturbing the Peace 383 Unattended Death 10 Drunk in Public 70 Vandalism 46 Extra Patrol Requests 26 Vehicle Embezzlement Fireworks 3 Vicious Dog 3 Follow -Up Investigations/Patrol 295 Warrant Service 271 911 Calls 661 Item No. 29 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: April 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: http://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-Improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new low -flow crossing of Murrieta Creek. Cost: $2,387,000 Status: In design until March 2022. Design and environmental are expected to last 24 months. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $11,457,436 Status: Phase 1 design and Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities include consultant preparation of 60% plans, and several engineering and environmental studies. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $137,356,246 Status: Currently in design. Work continues on the environmental re-evaluation. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $8,312,240 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities include roadway design, structures design, noise study work program, drainage studies, air quality conformity determination, design standard decision document, and historical resources compliance report. Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South. Cost: $52,025,657 Status: Construction of the project has been accepted as complete by the City and Caltrans. Per a 3-year Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-of-way to the State inventory. Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $14,307,394 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. CEQA approval is anticipated in Q2 2021. Type Selection Report submitted to Caltrans on July 9, 2020. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $1,340,400 Status: Design is at 60%. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits. Cost: $1,105,000 Status: Bids were opened on Tuesday, December 22, 2020. Construction contract has been awarded. Currently in construction, March to July 2021. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17 Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta Creek to Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $1,900,000 Status: Currently in construction, March to August 2021. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW19-08 Description: Rehabilitation of Butterfield Stage Road, south of Rancho California Road to De Portola Road and Pauba Road, from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Cost: $4,320,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive. Cost: $346,646.50 Status: Project is currently in design. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,347,674 Status: The project is being advertised for construction bids. Bid opening is scheduled on April 28, 2021. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Citywide — Concrete Repairs, PW20-10 Description: Remove and replace concrete improvements including, but not limited to curb & gutter, sidewalk, ADA access ramp, commercial drive approach, cross gutter, and curb outlet top of structure. Cost: $157,789 Status: Construction contract awarded to IE Engineering. Construction started on March 22, 2021. Contract is for 60 working days. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $5,000,000 Status: Phase 1 needs design initiated. Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, irrigation, and transportation art between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $4,427,350 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — June 2021. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, Design Engineering Evaluation Report, Project Specific Maintenance Agreement, Landscape Maintenance Agreement, Transportation Art / Community ID Proposal, and Copyright and Waiver of Moral Rights in Artwork. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $10,656,507.91 Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020 to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in December of 2022 with a grand opening in early 2023. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows. Cost: $430,000 Status: Project design initiated. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $6,288,595 Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed with construction has been issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Completion is scheduled for October 2021. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Cost: $2,716,764 Status: The project is in design. 100% PSE expected June 2021. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18 Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive. Cost: $442,077 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $467,403 Status: Project is currently in design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW17-02 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side Fifth Street, between Front Street and Murrieta Creek. Improvements include grind/overlay of entire street, tree grates, bollards, street lights. Cost: To be determined Status: Project is in design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Geotechnical investigation for design alternatives performed in mid -August 2019. Geotechnical report received October 1, 2019. Redesign started in February of 2020. CEQA to be completed in April of 2021. Plans are 60% complete. Construction is expected to begin in September of 2021. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $5,157,649 Status: Playground renovations & replacements projects for FY20/21 are completed. FY 21/22 projects are being designed. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also includes renovating the snack bar, and enlarging the storage case. Cost: $1,120,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Sports Court Resurfacing Description: Repairs and resurfacing of sport court surfacing at various parks and facilities. This includes tennis courts, basketball courts, and hockey rinks at various parks. Cost: $50,000 Status: Court re -surfacing completed in January at Margarita Community Park hockey rink. Project cost $13,900. Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks. Cost: $222,546.70 Status: Musco LED retrofit lighting for Ronald Reagan Sports Park Upper Soccer Fields installation scheduled for November 2020. Project cost $136,260.00. Currently seeking proposals for LED retrofit installation at tennis/pickleball courts and hockey rinks. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS Hilton Garden Inn Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division. Mexico Cafe Description: Grading plan and Street Improvement Plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 13,375 square foot Mexico Cafe restaurant south of the Temecula Parkway and Pechanga Parkway intersection. Status: Permit issued September 13, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road) Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development. Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Project is being phased at this time. Construction of Friendship Park (formerly known as Pala Park) has begun as of January 11, 2021. It is anticipated the development will reach 25% occupancy by Spring of 2021. Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch) Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan. Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in three tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Models are open. Production homes are under construction. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT April 27, 2021 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Staybridge Suites Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Temecula Village Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive. Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Traffic signal has been installed at Via Portofino. ELECTRONIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 19, 2021 8:37 AM To:Suzanne Lane Subject:RE: Public comment Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Suzanne Lane < Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2021 1:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment I completely agree with how this is worded so I didn’t see any reason to make changes. Thank you! As citizens, we demand the draconian measure of requiring the council members to wear masks against their will be withdrawn. The measure is unfounded and goes against logic, common sense, and many well trusted doctors. In fact, according to America's Front Line Doctors, It is a testimony to the power of propaganda, institutional capture, and the desire to socially conform that masking of the general population has successfully been imposed during the COVID-19 era. The harms from this imposition are palpable, and potentially long-term and gargantuan, not the least of which is the psychological training of the public to comply with an absurd measure that has direct personal negative impact. They review the mounting evidence of the obvious: Universal masking harms people and society, without any detectable benefit. You can read their scientific finding here: https://www.americasfrontlinedoctors.com/wp-content/uploads/5thsciencereview-masksharm-1.pdf I eagerly await your response as we are sure you understand your need to represent the countless constituents you have that want this nonsense to stop. You need to lead by example, and the example you are setting is one that defies logic and science. Please change course! 2 Thanks you! Suzanne Lane Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 20, 2021 1:56 PM To:Jane Lauhon Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jane Lauhon < Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 2:03 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Duh, I read the calendar wrong. Thank you! Jane Lauhon -----Original Message----- From: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> To: Jane Lauhon < Sent: Mon, Apr 19, 2021 1:52 pm Subject: RE: Jessica Alexander They are on the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. I will read it on April 27th. Thank you. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 2 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jane Lauhon < Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 1:51 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Dear Randi. I thought the meetings were the 2nd and 4th Tuesdays. Please wait until the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting to read my letter. Thank you for letting me know; I really appreciate it! Sincerely, Jane Lauhon -----Original Message----- From: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> To: Jane Lauhon < Sent: Mon, Apr 19, 2021 1:41 pm Subject: RE: Jessica Alexander Our next Council meeting is on April 27th. I can read it then or share with the Council sooner if you would like. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jane Lauhon < Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 11:58 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Dear Randi, I accidentally sent an email asking for the following letter to be read at tonight's City Council Meeting. It should be read at tomorrow evening's, April 20, 2021. Please read the following corrected copy. Thank you. Jane Lauhon Please read this at the Tuesday, April 20, 2021 Temecula City Council Meeting. To whom it may concern, I am appalled to be reading about and listening to the many malicious, nasty and hateful comments being spewed about Temecula City Council Member, Jessica Alexander because she chooses to take a stand on an issue she feels strongly about. We all feel strongly about something and, when intolerant people feel the need to be malicious, nasty and hateful, all it causes is division. We are certainly witnessing division at the highest level I have ever seen in our country, which saddens me to my core. 3 If I have learned anything, it is that "Those who preach tolerance, are the least tolerant!" "Those who preach tolerance, but aren't willing to tolerate another point of view, are hypocrites!" Jessica Alexander is an upstanding and honorable person with the highest of integrity, who served her community as a Police Officer and her country as a United States Marine. She deserves the upmost respect for her sacrifices! I want Jessica to know that I support her as a current Temecula City Council Member and that she doesn't deserve the malicious, nasty and hateful comments that she has had to endure at the hands of an intolerant, hateful group that only see things through their own rose colored glasses. I wish Jessica much success as a City Council Member. Sincerely, Jane Lauhon Temecula 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 20, 2021 1:50 PM To:jeff ducommun Subject:RE: Mask mandate Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: jeff ducommun < Sent: Monday, April 19, 2021 4:19 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Mask mandate As a physician of over 30 years and a concerned citizen, I strongly suggest that you reevaluate your policy on masks. Please follow the "science " and common sense approach to this issue. Many states have eliminated the "mask" mandate and are not experiencing any significant negative effects. In fact, I would suggest that they have had numerous positive consequences as a result of more normal social interactions. Florida is certainly a prime example. The vast majority of politicians remove their masks during on camera interactions, even when in a public venue. They understand the importance of facial expressions in communication with the public. When people are separated by greater than 6 feet, the usefulness of a mask is virtually nil. The risk of an infection causing significant illness/death is minuscule with the exception of how it affects specific subsets of the population. Someone would have to be totally "off the grid" to have not heard that the elderly, medically complicated, immune comprimised, and those who are obese are all known to be at increased risk. Please let people make their own choices as to how much risk they are willing to take. If attendees at the meeting feel more comfortable with a mask, no problem. If someone is obviously ill, then they should not attend but otherwise let Board members and other individuals exercise their God given rights to live their lives without having to endure absurd attempts to eliminate all risk. Otherwise, what is next? Shall we eliminate skydiving, football, Corvettes or other potentially dangerous activities in order to eliminate all risk? Shouldn't Temecula be on the forefront of science and a beacon to others on how common sense should be applied? I look forward to seeing the faces of your board members and not their surgical or designer masks. 2 Thank you for your time and consideration of this issue. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 20, 2021 1:45 PM To:jamie_rdh Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander Rant Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: jamie_rdh < Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 1:03 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Rant I am appaled at the rant council member Jessica Alexander made comparing mask wearing to the plight of Rosa Parks!? The mental gymnastics that is required to equate the inhumane treatment of blacks for hundreds of years to the temporary mask mandate is really astonishing. Her rant reeks of white privilege and I find her comments and beliefs to be insensitive and way out of touch with reality. Please remove her of her duties. How does this person represent Temecula? She is another smear to our fine city. There should be no place for this level of ignorance in our city's government. Jamie Ann Lopez Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Wednesday, April 21, 2021 8:16 AM To:Laura Quaid Subject:RE: Attacks on Council Members : "Wearing Masks Or Not Wearing Masks" -April 27, 2021 Council Meeting-Public Comments Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Laura Quaid < Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2021 8:30 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Attacks on Council Members : "Wearing Masks Or Not Wearing Masks" -April 27, 2021 Council Meeting-Public Comments TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Let it be known that I fully support Council members Alexander and Stewarts' reasons for not wearing a mask at Council meetings. It is not reasonable or logical to require a mask to be worn when we allow no masks to be worn in public restaurants "upon being seated." Council members Alexander and Stewart will be sitting during the council meetings and at least 20 feet away from fellow council members. Is Covid only transferable when one is standing? As a citizen of this country, I find it discriminatory to require citizens to wear a mask to "hide" their faces, their emotions, their expressions, and their individuality. It has become a tool used to manipulate people to continue to live in a state of suspended fear . I wish to see the faces of our council members and to clearly hear what they are saying. A state of unreasonable fear is being fostered in this community with the continued "mask required" demands. . I expect our leaders to demonstrate a posture of confidence to their citizens and to not foster fear demonstrated by hiding behind a mask with muffled voices. I respect Council members Alexander and Stewart's position to not wear a mask in chambers. 2 Respectfully, Laura Quaid 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Wednesday, April 21, 2021 9:08 AM To:Bob Quaid Subject:RE: For April 27 Council Meeting-Public Comments Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Bob Quaid < Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 8:36 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: For April 27 Council Meeting-Public Comments Honorable Mayor and City council members. It has come to my attention that there is a group of individuals who are attacking council member Alexander because of her stance against the ludicrous mask mandate requiring members to mask up if they want to be allowed to attend in-chamber council meetings or stay segregated in their offices. Councilmember Alexander referenced her plight to Rosa Parks, an American hero who stood up against the injustice shown blacks back in the dark days of the Jim Crow south. Council member Alexander's comparison may have been a bit of a stretch , but for her detractors to label her comment as racist and hateful is an extremely racist and a twisted interpretation of her stance against oppression, implying that a white women cannot use a black women as her example. The people of Temecula are tired of being manipulated by the state and county officials to gain power over us and segregating our council between mask or no mask only bows to the manipulation and is not acceptable. Wearing anything less than an N95 rated mask has never been unquestionably proven by science to stop the spread of the COVID virus, no more than a rabbit's foot is scientifically proven to bring good luck. Both are superstition. The mask wearing has outlived whatever illusion it was intended to serve. It's time to end the COVID paranoia represented by the mask and get back to regular City business in person. Our council members were elected to serve the residents of their district in-chambers where their constituents 2 can clearly see and hear them without the encumbrance of a useless mask that only muffles speech and in Council Member Alexander's case further endangers, not protects her health. Lastly, our beautiful City Hall should be wide open again just like Old Town where every weekend you find people like me and my wife who are not so afraid of dying that we stop living...eating, drinking, and enjoying our neighbors and friends without the chain of wearing a mask. Life is wonderful when you're trusting your amazing God given 99% effective immune system for protection and not living in the darkness of fear and death. As our elected officials, it's time for you to stop trusting in man and start acting in faith and trusting in God to whom you pray to before each council meeting (Reference to Jeremiah 17:5). Thank you for your consideration. Bob Quaid Resident of District 2 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:54 AM To:Summer Berg Subject:RE: Public Comments for Next Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Summer Berg < Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:36 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments for Next Council Meeting Good evening Temecula City Council, Thank you for taking the time to hear my concerns. My name is Summer Berg and I have been a resident of Temecula for over a decade. I would like to address the shocking culturally insensitive remarks made by Council Member Jessica Alexander at the April city council meeting. To hear Councilmember Alexander compare the mask mandate to the oppression of the Black Community and herself to Rosa Parks was so out of line it made me feel nauseated. This is especially sickening after I learned that Councilmember Alexander did not attend the Diversity Training Workshop on April 6. Councilmember Alexander’s own Facebook page tagline states “Strengthening the Heart of Temecula, Protecting its Values and Traditions, Unify, Educate, Serve.” I do not see those words reflected in Councilmember Alexander’s actions and statements. She chose not to educate herself at the workshop. She is choosing not to unify the city or the council by defying mask mandates. She should be setting an example for citizens, yet she is dividing the community by making tone-deaf statements about racial icons. I urge the council and the city to take action. Please address this behavior with a public statement in support of unity and in support of the Black community. And please demand that 2 Councilmember Alexander receive the diversity and equality training that she needs and has previously refused. I ask that if she chooses to remain ignorant and closed minded on matters of racial equality and her own privilege that she resign from office. Please stand up for the BIPOC community in Temecula. There is no place for this behavior here. Period. Thank you for your time, Summer Berg 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:33 AM To: Subject:RE: General Comment for May 1st Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 7:15 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: General Comment for May 1st Please, just open up the Temecula City council to the citizens on May 4th. Most of the surrounding city councils are open and some of the city councilpersons don’t wear masks. You are more than 6 feet apart and maybe 20 feet from the citizens. Masks should be as needed now; the worst is over and most people have had it or have been vaxxed. Those that can’t wear a mask should not now be required to wear one. Those who want to wear a mask can continue to wear one. It’s time to return to normal. We Americans are free to make our own choices on most things and it is time to let us free so we can relive our lives before Covid started. Thank you. Bob Kowell 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:30 AM To:Whitney Walsh Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander's comments during the council meeting of 4/13/21 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Whitney Walsh < Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 9:22 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander's comments during the council meeting of 4/13/21 To the Temecula City Council: I have seen the video of the last council meeting and am deeply shocked and offended that one of our civic leaders is comparing wearing a mask to protect the health of our community to Rosa Park's actions after being forced to submit to institutional racism. This is especially disturbing in light of the fact that another one of Temecula's city council members, James “Stew” Stewart, made headlines a few months ago by saying he didn’t “believe there’s ever been a good person of color killed by a police officer.” I understand that Ms. Alexander failed to attend the Equity and Diversity Training that all other Councilmembers attended, set up in part as a response to Councilman Stewart’s headline-making remarks. It appears she truly needs this training and should rectify this immediately and apologize for comparing herself to a civil rights icon. She should also apologize for her self-centered remarks that do nothing but harm to this community. When running for her office, Ms. Alexander said she was exactly the City Council member that Temecula needs right now in these trying and unpredictable times. She said one of her 3 visionary goals was: Building Bridges: Unifying the community by connecting diverse people and organizations together. Her remarks on April 13th have done just the opposite and once again, our city council is presenting Temecula as, at the very least, as tone deaf. 2 Whitney Walsh 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:30 AM To:Allison Donahoe-Beggs Subject:RE: Last City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Allison Donahoe-Beggs < Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 11:18 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Last City Council Meeting I would like this public comment read before the 4/27 City Council Meeting and the next REDI Meeting. Hello, I am a Temecula resident of 23 years and my husband and I have raised our two children in this community. My youngest is currently a Sophomore at Great Oak High School. After hearing the remarks made by Jessica Alexander at the last City Council meeting about mask-wearing, I had to send in a comment. All I heard from this public servant was how mask wearing affects her. Not only was this extremely selfish and inappropriate to her seat and her job, she then compared herself to Rosa Parks for not wearing a mask. This should not go unaddressed as this is extremely offensive. I understand that Ms. Alexander failed to attend the Equity and Diversity Training that all of the other Councilmembers attended. It appears she truly needs this training and should rectify this immediately and apologize for comparing herself to a civil rights icon. She should also apologize for her self-centered remarks that do nothing but harm to this community. To combat COVID and ensure no more deaths, no more debilitating illness, no more jobs and businesses lost, we HAVE to be in this together. We need to follow the safety protocols to ensure we are not infecting each other and one EASY way to do this is wear a mask. To say, in a City Council meeting, that she is against mask-wearing, is just downright dangerous. Jessica Alexander should resign unless she retracts her statement, apologizes for comparing herself to Rosa Parks, attends the Diversity and Equity Training, and attends the REDI Commission meetings. 2 Thank you, Allison Donahoe-Beggs Temecula, CA 92592 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:30 AM To:Lloyd Mize Subject:RE: Aaron Adams & Temecula City Council Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Lloyd Mize < Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 12:33 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Subject: Aaron Adams & Temecula City Council My last email to Temecula City Council was in August 2020. You are not representing the interest of the majority of citizens in Temecula and it is getting worse. I, supported by a majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, wrote you in August demanding not to form the REDI Commission. You did not listen. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, again supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2 Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula, if people want to wear a mask great. There is no science or evidence that Mask stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful. Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Christ Centered and Conservative Values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! Embrace Jessica and the citizens that elected her to the office of Temecula City Council. She and we strive to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of all citizens and people within our community. We are people of love and care for all of our citizens of our beautiful Temecula. Together we support, care for and love all people. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Lloyd Mize CalDRE 006400092 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:34 AM To:Jennie Soderquist Subject:RE: Support Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jennie Soderquist < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:23 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Support You are not representing the interest of the majority of citizens in Temecula and it is getting worse. I, supported by a majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, wrote you in August demanding not to form the REDI Commission. You did not listen. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, again supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2 Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula, if people want to wear a mask great. There is no science or evidence that Mask stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful. Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Christ Centered and Conservative Values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! Embrace Jessica and the citizens that elected her to the office of Temecula City Council. She and we strive to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of all citizens and people within our community. We are people of love and care for all of our citizens of our beautiful Temecula. Together we support, care for and love all people. Let’s be a “model community” for others communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Jennie Soderquist Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:30 AM To:Yolanda Villafana Subject:RE: Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Yolanda Villafana < Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 2:44 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, again supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula, if people want to wear a mask great. There is no science or evidence that masks stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful. Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements. 2 Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Christ Centered and Conservative Values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! This type of behavior creates more division, not unity. We, the people, voted for Jessica Alexander and appreciate her love for this city and dedicated service over the years for our nation. Thank you. Yolanda Villafana 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:29 AM To:Gia Rueda Subject:RE: Denounce Alexander's racially insensitive comments, & require training Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Gia Rueda < Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2021 6:45 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Denounce Alexander's racially insensitive comments, & require training April 24, 2021 Dear Temecula City Councilmembers, City Manager & REDI Commission, I request that the members of the City Council make a public statement denouncing the words of Councilmember Jessica Alexander regarding her inappropriate and racially insensitive comment comparing mask wearing to Rosa Parks. I also request she be required to attend the Diversity & Equality Training Workshop she previously missed on April 6, 2021. I was disappointed to hear comments by Councilmember Jessica Alexander, comparing the reasonable, lifesaving act of donning a face covering, to the civil rights struggles of Rosa Parks. Her comments were insensitive and historically ill- informed. It is shockingly inappropriate to compare the task of slowing the spread of a deadly virus, to the hateful institutionalized segregation enforced upon people of color in the Jim Crow south. Furthermore, if Ms. Alexander is going to invoke the spirit of Rosa Parks, she should at least understand the bus incident, instead of making up her own version of history. News flash, Jessica: Rosa Parks did not dema nd to sit in the front of the bus, she simply refused to give up her seat in the “colored section” of the bus, for a white man. 2 Hate and intolerance has no place in Temecula. Denounce Ms. Alexander’s comments, and require her to attend training. With Respect, Gia Rueda Temecula Resident Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:29 AM To:Simon Cooper Subject:RE: Support for Jessica Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Simon Cooper < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 8:36 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Support for Jessica Alexander Hello, As a concerned citizen of the community, please consider the following. In November, citizens of Temecula elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. Since that time, there has been an abundance of hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander, and it must stop. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, again supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, to do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. Also, I am asking that you support the immediate elimination of the ‘Mask Wearing’ edict in Temecula. There is no science or evidence that face coverings stop the transmission of disease, and in fact there are studies that show evidence of them actually being harmful to humans. 2 It is time that all local businesses should be allowed to stay open with no restricted capacity requirements. Jessica Alexander is our elected official and needs to be respected, and the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’ needs to be discouraged and condemned. She has the Christ-centered and conservative values that were voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that Jessica and her supporters are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging by discouraging and condemning it! With Jessica representing the citizens of her district, we strive to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of all citizens and people within our community. We are people of love and care for all of our citizens of our beautiful Temecula, and everywhere. Together we support, care for and love all people. Let’s be a “model community” for other's communities as well. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Respectfully, Simon Cooper Executive Pastor (951) 444-7337 Ext. 103 simon@412murrieta.com 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:29 AM To:Tanya Littman Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander Remarks Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Tanya Littman < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 10:52 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Remarks The views expressed by City Councilor, Jessica Alexander at the City Council meeting on April 13th were extremely misleading and hurtful. To compare a mask mandate to the racist laws of segregation is a false equivalency. It’s very simple, and please make sure Mrs Alexander is aware, that she is comparing being discriminated against for something you CAN change with being discriminated against for something you CAN’T change. Mrs Alexander could change whether or not to put on a mask and move freely anywhere she may choose where Rosa Parks could NOT change the color of her skin and could NOT take any action to change whether she was discriminated against or not. Please share this simple concept with all of Temecula Valley City leadership so that these false comparisons will end. They are only serving to damage and divide our community and the MUST stop. Thank you for your consideration to this matter. Sincerely, Tanya Spedalieri Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:28 AM To:Jeanette-Marie Bassi Subject:RE: Constituent Concern Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jeanette-Marie Bassi < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 1:20 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Constituent Concern Dear City Council Members and Staff, hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true! I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. Are you allowing yourselves to be intimidated, and as a result, vote against the majority of your constituents? I certainly hope this is not the case. 2 I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The behavior and messaging, discourage it! 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask t hus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! I understand that freedom of citizens regarding wearing masks is controversial (I wear my mask when I am out in public even though I received both vaccine shots) but wearing masks should not be mandated by the government. I firmly believe that speech without harassment, and being called a racist for standing up for religious beliefs and values, is beyond wrong and against our constitution, let alone our city values. Harassment toward our elected official, Jessica Alexander, should not be tolerated and as your constituent, you should not tolerate it either. Allowing Ms. Alexander to be called “culturally insensitive” or/racist has become the cliché term for anyone who doesn’t agree with 3 you. This needs to stop and it starts with you, as our representative, to make sure it stops infiltrating our community. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. Jeanette Marie Bassi ( 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:28 AM To:Bruce and Marjorie Drayton Subject:RE: Community Information Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Bruce and Marjorie Drayton < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 2:12 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Community Information City Council members, City Clerk & City Manager, My husband and I have lived in Temecula for the past 21 years. We Love our community and all of our neighbors. We have seen our community become more and more Liberal and less and less Conservative. But we believed in our good neighbors and Churches always would be open to our thoughts and needs too. Now we are learning that our City Council & City Managers have turned into a biased bigoted group who wishes to CANCEL those members who are are more Conservative than the others. We find that outrages and unfair!. We are also citizens and should also have a voice in our community. We as citizens voted to elect Jessica Alexander and re-elect Stew Stewart. And then learned you had decided to form the REDI Commission to review our city. We are respectively demanding that you STOP the required training of the REDI commission. As a matter of fact it should be eliminated completely!! The citizens of Temecula do not want this and we did NOT vote for the REDI Commission! We as citizens also do NOT approve of demanding MASKING for everyone. If citizens prefer to wear a mask so be it…But with Religious Beliefs and Vaccines it should be up to the individual citizen. It may be that wearing masks for long periods of time may be harmful. We also want to keep all business open with NO restriction requirements. 2 We want Respect for all Board Members. Including Jessica Alexander. She was dually elected and her Conservative values should be welcome. IN conclusion the inference and outright statements that Temecula is NOT inclusive and that we are racist is very hurtful and not true. We love our Community and all of it’s people. Stop this behavior of messaging, discourage it all! Embrace Jessica and the citizens that elected her to the office of Temecula City Council. She and we strive to engage and make better our beautiful Temecula. Regards, Bruce and Marjorie Drayton 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:28 AM To:Jon C Subject:RE: Public Comments to be read at next city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jon C < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 4:03 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: maryannedwards@temeculaca.gov; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Public Comments to be read at next city council meeting Does Jessica Alexander represent Temecula? Does she represent her district? I don't know, and I hope she doesn't. Last summer the city council unanimously passed a resolution condemning racism. Now another member of the city council is spewing racist rhetoric. I saw each of your faces and reactions to Jessica's abhorrent remarks, however not one of you took a stand to condemn her words or even educate her. Is this what Temecula has become, a city that allows racist rhetoric to exist and go unchecked, and for racists to sit at the table of government? Why didn't Jessica attend the Equity and Diversity Training every other member of the council attended? Mayor Pro Tem Edwards, if you do not condemn Jessica's actions, that will be a part of your legacy as well. To each of you who plan on running for re-election, if you remain silent, I assure you your silence on this matter will be the loudest part of your challengers' election campaign. Jonathan Chang 1 Erika Ramirez From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:28 AM To:LeeAnn Keer Subject:RE: Public comments for next city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: LeeAnn Keer < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 6:30 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comments for next city council meeting Good evening and thank you for taking the time to read this. My name is LeeAnn Keer and I have been a Temecula resident for the last 4 years. I recently learned about some abhorrent statements made at the April City Council Meeting by Council member Jessica Alexander. I am appalled and horrified that an elected official in my city would feel it is ok to compare herself to a civil rights icon like Rosa Parks. This is not acceptable! In no uncertain terms, is the requirement for EVERYONE to cover their face for public safety during a pandemic anywhere near the same as forcing Black citizens to give up their seat on public transportation to a white citizen! For Council member Alexander to make that connection shows an unbelievable amount of privilege and ignorance. I have also learned recently that Council member Alexander was the only member on the council that was absent at a Workshop Regarding Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Initiative. This is again unacceptable. Temecula needs to be uplifting, supporting, and protecting its BIPOC community, not trivializing their struggles. I urge the council and the city to take action! Demand that Council member Alexander receive the training that she missed earlier this month, or resign from office. I would also like to see a public statement from city leadership denouncing her words at the April council meeting. Hate has no place in Temecula. Thank you for your time. -LeeAnn Keer Sent from my iPad 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:28 AM To:Julie Geary Subject:RE: Please read this into the record for the next city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julie Geary < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 7:28 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Please read this into the record for the next city council meeting Hello I am Julie Geary, a member of Temecula Unity, I have lived in this valley since 1997, and I am a resident of Temecula. I love this city, and because I love Temecula I push for it to be a place where All feel welcome. On August 11th 2020 The Temecula City Council passed a resolution denouncing racism in ALL its forms, and declaring its commitment to the advancement of equity, diversity, and inclusion. A few weeks later REDI was born and had the most applicants in the city's history. I commend you for committing to this journey and wanting to be a leader in the valley for positive change and growth. On April 6th, 2021 the city council along with the city clerk, the City Manager, and the city attorney, underwent Race, Equity, and Leadership training through the league of cities. Thank you for acknowledging that many truths and histories were excluded in our schools growing up; it’s not our fault for not knowing, but once we know we can do better. You were brave in being vulnerable and sharing your unique stories and perspectives. However, someone was noticeably absent from this meeting. Jessica Alexander did not show up, and her omission from the training shows that she is not committed 2 to the advancement of equity, diversity, and inclusion. Her values do not align with the resolution denouncing racism. People of color can’t opt out of learning about the history of systemic oppression in this country; they live with it daily. It’s not enough to say you are not racist therefore you don’t need to attend training. It’s not enough to say that it’s better now than sixty years ago and that racism is over. One must b e actively anti racist. Active anti racists acknowledge that there is more work to be done right here in our city. What does it say when an elected official refuses to show up, refuses to learn, listen and grow? Their silence is deafening. In the next city council meeting on April 13th, Jessica Alexander made the following statement. “Look at Rosa Parks, she was accommodated in the back of the bus and she finally took a stand and moved to the front because she knew that that wasn’t lawful, so she took a stand. At what point in time do we? I’m getting pushed to the back of the bus, this is what I feel like.” This statement is: one historically inaccurate, and two extremely insensitive to people of color to equate having the option of wearing a mask, face shield or attending meetings via zoom to the systems of systemic oppression faced by people of color in this country. Council member Rahn quoted George Santayana in saying “ Those who can not remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” Jessica didn’t sho w up to learn about the past, and now the city is once again making news because of racism. Rosa Parks didn’t move to the front of the bus as Jessica stated, rather she refused to give up her seat in the “colored section” to a white man. Jessica is not systematically oppressed for wearing a mask, she hasn’t lost any freedoms, or liberties. The mask is required by OSHA and is part of the current dress code at City Hall, the guideline is applied equally to everyone regardless of race, class, ability, gender, or sexuality. This false equivalence is abhorrent, and perhaps it wouldn’t have been made if she attended the training and understood the implicit bias of her words. In the meeting, she only spoke only about how she felt, she continually used I statements in her messaging. This shows that Jessica has an unwillingness to put public service above self. Her words and actions show that she refuses to listen to people that do not agree with her, and shows that she is an ineffective leader. Council member Zak stated “that decisions we make at the local level truly matter to the people that live in and around the city”. It is time to make a decision. Does Jessica Alexander represent the values we want in city leadership? Do her words and actions build bridges and unify the city? Or does she cause division. Council member Edwards, you referenced the MLK quote; 'The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people but the silence over that by the good people.' You then went on to say that you need to start speaking up and to be brave. The time to be brave is now, I am asking you to be brave and condemn the actions and speech of Jessica Alexander. I am calling on the city council to censure her rhetoric and actions. I am calling on you to require all council members to make a commitment to the advancement of equity, diversity, and inclusion or resign from office immediately if they are unwilling . 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:26 AM To:Maliha Williamson Subject:RE: I Strongly Condemn Jessica Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Maliha Williamson < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 10:14 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: I Strongly Condemn Jessica Alexander Hi Randi, I am writing to strongly condemn the views expressed by Jessica Alexander at the City Council meeting on April 13, 2021. Throughout the meeting, we could see her shaking her head, as facts were being shared regarding the current public health crisis concerning Covid-19 and a lack of empathy regarding what this country has gone through the past year in dealing with a pandemic that was poorly handled to begin with. Her anti-masker views were not only self-serving and mis-leading but also dangerous for the constituents she represents. If she doesn't possess the flexibility to understand others' viewpoints and the ability to adapt to an ever-changing environment, which will always be the case in any environment, maybe she needs to go find another job. To add to the injury, towards the end of the meeting, she compared herself to Rosa Parks. How dare she? These comments were insensitive and showed her lack of understanding of the civil rights movement as a whole. This is a week after she was the only one who refused to show up to the Race, Equity and Leadership training. I see her unfit to serve in public office and I am asking for her immediate resignation. Best Regards, Maliha Williamson ADEM Delegate AD67 2 ( 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:23 AM To: Subject:FW: public comments Attachments:Public comments to Temecula City Council.pdf Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: v gotay < Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 11:22 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: public comments I would like my comments to be publicly read at the next meeting on April 27. You can find my comments attached in the document. Thank you! Public comments for Temecula City Council Good evening. As a concerned citizen, I write the following comments: I want and request in person meetings open to the public. In addition, per the protection granted us by ADA, those in attendance who have exemptions will not be wearing a face covering or shield. I do NOT approve of any pay raise whatsoever for Aaron Adams. I support both Stu and Jessica in their stance against wearing face coverings. I support Jessica Alexander’s request of having in person council meetings instead of continuing meeting through Zoom. I feel very strongly of the importance of face to face interaction and eye contact in establishing connection, trust, and respect. I feel very strongly that the council will be more effective by working together face to face. Valerie Hernandez 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:27 AM To:Joy Wilson Subject:RE: City council meeting 4/27 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Joy Wilson < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:25 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City council meeting 4/27 Good Evening City Council! We believe this local hate group in Temecula has taken it too far with their accusations of Jessica. Rosa Parks belongs to all of us as an inspiration to stand up for what you believe in no matter what. Jessica had no ill-intent of bringing up Rosa’s story. This local group is pushing everything to be racist when it is not. We are over their games and antics, they are nothing but an immature, violence-inciting hate group tackling every tiny word and twisting it to their agenda. There are thousands in this town and millions across the country who believe the mask mandate needs to go, for many reasons. We respect and support Jessica in her stand. Thank you! 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:29 AM To: Subject:RE: City Council Action Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2021 11:00 AM To: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Action Dear City Council Members and Staff, I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask thus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. Denise Grandi 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:32 AM To: Subject:RE: REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:29 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI Commission Dear City Council Members and Staff, I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected James Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! 2 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask thus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:19 AM To:Connie Villaseñor Subject:RE: Please Read Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Connie Villaseñor < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 7:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Please Read Dear City Council Members and Staff, I am writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of like-minded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop 2 the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected James Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask thus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. 3 Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. Thank You, Connie Villasenor Temecula Resident 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:18 AM To:Janine Plano Subject:RE: Issues that need to be addressed that don't reflect values of community. Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Janine Plano < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:27 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Issues that need to be addressed that don't reflect values of community. Dear City Council Members and Staff, I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of likeminded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask thus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be a “model community” for other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. Anders and Janine Plano Residents for 30 years 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:20 PM To:thunnell Subject:RE: Dear City Council Members and Staff, Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: thunnell < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:12 PM To: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Dear City Council Members and Staff, Dear City Council Members and Staff, I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of likeminded Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI 2 commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2. In November Jessica Alexander was elected and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent the citizens values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is Temecula citizens city, collectively. Respect Jessica Alexander as the elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values that were voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! 3. Immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula. If people want to wear a mask fine; if people don’t want to wear a mask that is fine too. A study published on April 20, 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Journal concluded that public wearing of masks increased risk of: -bacterial and viral infections, -lowered oxygen levels, -headache, -fatigue of the wearer, -psychological effects, -social effects These effects happen because of not having the same hygiene standards of those available to workers in a hospital environment. These effects were also amplified when the wearer communicates because of the need to speak louder to be heard through the mask t hus increasing the moisture and particulates within the mask. Let our citizens chose their preference! 4. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. Together we support, care for, and love all people and businesses within the community. Let’s be the “model community” we have always exemplified, by leading other communities. Thank you for your open hearts and for your time of service. Your actions that reflect the values of the people you represent are appreciated. Claudia Thunnell 3 Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 8:44 AM To:M. Go Subject:RE: Stop spreading hate with a dose of covid Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: M. Go < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:39 AM To: Erika.ramirez@temecula.org; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; jessica.alexander@temecula.org; maryann.edwards@temecula.org; matt.rahn@temecula.gov; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stop spreading hate with a dose of covid I am I resident of Temecula. Equating mask wearing to the struggle for equal dignified human rights is frankly inflammatory idiocy. That Alexander was absent from diversity training speaks loudly to her closed mind. Those who don’t learn from history end up repeating the same sorry mistakes. For a health substantive meaningful healthy city I call for Alexander to be sanctioned for inflammatory useless rhetoric. Thank you M. Golden 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 11:45 AM To:Nobiensky Subject:RE: Do Away with REDI Commission and Listen to Jessica Alexander's Objections Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Nobiensky < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:20 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Do Away with REDI Commission and Listen to Jessica Alexander's Objections Dear Temecula Council Members, Life has been crazy enough without adding REDI Commission training to the mix. Critical Race Theory is racist to the core. Read Hillsdale College's article on it. It only breeds hatred and victimhood; as well as instability and chaos to usher in the marxist revolution desired by those already in power--Democrats, academia, big tech, mainstream media, and the billionaire athletes. Be wiser than they are. Consult the Great Barrington Declaration of esteemed scientists and public health officials around the globe and eliminate the wearing of masks. The air quality within the mask is toxic to the individuals wearing them. Let's march to the beat of better drummers, Laura Nobiensky Temecula Citizen 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 11:44 AM To:Gillian Larson Subject:RE: My public comment for Tuesdays meeting please Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Gillian Larson < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 10:36 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: My public comment for Tuesdays meeting please Hi Randi, Please read my comment, including my name at the meeting tomorrow. Thanks Gillian My name is Gillian Larson and I have been a resident of Temecula for 20 years. I attend or watch City Council meetings frequently to hear what the City is doing, to feel the pulse of the community, and know what is happening in our city. I found the agenda item during the meeting of April 13th to vote on opening the meetings to in-pe rson sessions, in my mind, take a turn for the worse in many ways. I found Ms. Alexander insinuating that the Council and City Staff had not been productive over the past year because of virtual meetings, insulting and indicating how little she must know about what has been achieved through hard work over the past year in all City departments for the good of Temecula. I am fully aware there are different views on masks and other health and safety guidelines to help prevent the spread of Covid. After hearing the scientific and legal information presented by City 2 Council and Council Member Rahn, I considered it shameful for a Council Member to blatantly express personal views and intentions from the dias in a public and evergreen setting. In the last few minutes, Ms. Alexander comparing herself to Rosa Parks was abhorrent. This type of behavior from a Council Member has once again and will continue to put Temecula in the national spotlight representing who we all are in Temecula totally false. Thank you for the virtual opportunity and privilege to express my opinion. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 11:41 AM To:Michelle Naron Subject:RE: Temecula city manager Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Michelle Naron < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 10:55 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula city manager No raises for anyone on city council. No raises for city manager!!!! This is excessive, when so many of us have suffered financially this past year...NO MONETARY INCREASES! 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:30 PM To:Silvia Gray Subject:RE: Pay raise Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Silvia Gray < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 11:56 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Pay raise I’m a taxpayer in the City of Temecula and I’m in oposición to pay raises to the City Council. They make enough money as it is! Silvia Gray. Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:30 PM To:Silvia Gray Subject:RE: Correction Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Silvia Gray < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 11:59 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Correction City manager makes to much money already! Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:30 PM To:Vivian Crowe Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander statements Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Vivian Crowe < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:09 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander statements Again, Temecula City Council is in the headlines for statements that are at best insensitive to the current client in the community. Council members need to be aware of the impact of their thoughtless and wreckless remarks and the shadow those words caste on the entire community. Words Matter, please address this ongoing issue. Vivian Crowe 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:29 PM To:Kevin Subject:RE: Pay raise Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Kevin < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:23 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Pay raise I understand there will be meeting to determine pay raises. With many folks still jobless and businesses struggling with closure and limited capacity and parents struggling to manage their family and education I am requesting a cease to all pay raises. Has the city seen an increase in revenue or reduction in expenses to justify pay increases? Thank you for your attention into this matter. Kevin Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:29 PM To: Subject:FW: PUBLIC COMMENT TO BE READ AT COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 27TH Attachments:Public Comment Temcula City Council April 27-2021.pdf Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Lisa Skinner < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:27 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: PUBLIC COMMENT TO BE READ AT COUNCIL MEETING ON APRIL 27TH Randi, Please read my comments in the attached document during the Public Comment section of the city council meeting on April 27, 2021. Document is 37k and will take just over 2 minutes to read. I will be on the Zoom and looking forward to hearing my comments being read in their entirety. Thank you, Lisa Skinner -- It is time for the city council to open up City Hall that We the People pay for. It is time for in person city council meetings that allow for the general public to be in attendance. Under both OSHA and the California Health Department regulations, NO ONE with a medical exception will be required to wear ANY type of face covering to attend these public meetings. I am sure I do not need to remind the council of the ADA laws protecting my rights. I am against Aaron Adams or any other city official, receiving any sort of compensation increase. I have spoken to many local business owners and NOT ONE has heard from Aaron Adams to see how they are doing. Not one has been asked how Aaron Adams can be of service to them. But yet, Aaron Adams has control of how money is being spent. I support Jessica Alexander's request of having in-person council meetings and feel very strongly that the council will be more effective by working together "face-to-face". The importance of eye contact is undeniable. Eye contact shows respect and reflects our sincerity, warmth and honesty. Eye contact shows the speaker you understand what they are saying. Eye contact is powerful in creating long-lasting bonds. Eye contact evokes presence and projects confidence, self-esteem and assertiveness while speaking. Interpreting body language is also a crucial part of the communication process. I have been on your Zoom city council meetings. I see council members appear distracted. I see council members looking away from their screens. I see council members with blank looks on their faces that can be interpreted as indifference. Whether you care or not, the people of this community need to be able to make eye contact with each of you when expressing our concerns and grievances. To Jessica Alexander, keep fighting! I feel compelled to remind each of you that you work for me and every other community member. We are YOUR boss and your only concern should be how to do your jobs in a way that honors, respects and edifies the lives of your constituents. That means no special favors. That means equal opportunity for all. That means when we win, we win together. And that means, when we lose, we lose together. That means NOT expecting the public to lose businesses, lose life savings, lose the ability to put food on the table and a roof over their heads while servants like Aaron Adams makes $420,000 per year with his wife pulling in another $150,000 without missing one paycheck. The local business community is feeling betrayed and that should weigh heavy on all your minds. You all have a choice. You all took an oath to defend the Constitution. I suggest that you start by actually reading that document, then I expect you, as our servants, to do your jobs. Respectfully, Lisa Skinner 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:28 PM To:Torie Moreno-Riano Subject:RE: Ceasing City Council Raises & Transparency Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Torie Moreno-Riano < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 12:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Ceasing City Council Raises & Transparency Dear Randi, I would like to formally request that raises made for city council member be but on hold and re-assessed along with the needs of the city. As a family member of a small business owner in Temecula, this last year has been brutal to so many. Many have had a decrease in income, lost jobs, and livelihoods. To improve trust and transparency as well as support by community members, the move to increase an already high salary should be explained to our community. So many are suffering because they were forced to shut down with no choice to ignore it. How can such a large raise for a city council member be justified in any way but specifically during this day and age of COVID economic suffering. Can you explain why this is a closed meeting and what protocol is used to justify such large raises? Thanks, Victoria Cole 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:28 PM To: Subject:FW: Request for comment time Attachments:4-27-2021 Comments.docx Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jason Lund < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 1:14 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Request for comment time Please find attached my comments as requested for presentation. Regards, JRL Jason R. Lund CA Insurance License 0808110 43460 ridge park drive Suite 200-M 2 Temecula ca 92590 Office: 951-461-3638 www.lundfinancialmanagement.com Please use the link below to schedule an appointment: www.calendly.com/lundfinancialmanagement Advisory Services Offered Through Client One Securities, LLC an Investment Advisor. Lund Financial and Client One Securities, LLC are not affiliated. Notice: This E-mail (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS2510- 2521 and is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any retention, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Please reply to sender if you have received this message in error; then permanently delete it. Thank you. Subject: Public Commentary From: Jason R. Lund To: Randi Johl My commentary is as follows for presentation during the City Council Meeting on 4/27/2021. Please immediately open all council meetings to the public. All persons that are categorized as protected under ADA will not be wearing any face coverings. We are in need of the leadership that may be exhibited by such an action. I disapprove wholeheartedly with any increase in compensation for Aaron Adams in any way. His current inability to properly serve the community is borderline reprehensible in these trying times. Simply closing down the city buildings and refusing the owners access is not way to serve the voters. I fully support council members Stew and Jessica for their willingness to face opposition in their refusal to wear any mask. Strength of will is a necessary thing these days in our elected officials. Please begin in person council meetings immediately so there is a rebuilding of cohesiveness among the elected members. Keeping an in person visual presence and a visual contact in proximity to others will allow for a more sincere and certainly more forthright representation of all statements made during meetings. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:27 PM To:Christina Herington Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander, REDI Commission and masks Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Christina Herington < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 1:53 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander, REDI Commission and masks Dear City Council members, Mayor Edwards, City Manager/Assistant Manager, I believe you are making a grave and all too common error. You have mistaken the pandemic induced silence of the citizenry for consent and agreement. Politicians have for years taken the silence of those busy with their lives and families for consent, and shame on us citizens for being complacent and not making our voices heard. I have been a silent Christ following conservative Temecula resident for over 20 years. There are thousands more like me and I guarantee continuing on the dark and destructive path you have chosen will bring us out in droves. Jessica Alexander was elected to City Council by the residents of Temecula. She is doing exactly what we elected her to do, stand up for us! You say you embrace diversity, well here it is. Or does the new definition of diversity only apply to skin color and exclude thoughts, beliefs, values and world views? Critical Race Theory is anti-God, anti-Christianity and against all that our country stands for and holds dear. It is nothing more than Marxism in disguise. Marx pitted worker against capitalist and encouraged violent revolution; in the simplest of terms, Critical Race Theory pits dark skinned people against light skinned people. I believe it would be criminal to coerce, shame or demand that Jessica Alexander against her will be subjected to the REDI Training dogma. Forcing someone into reeducation training brings to mind rather dark chapters of history wouldn’t you say? The REDI Commission is a Trojan horse designed to infiltrate and infect our local government with these anti American and anti Christian Neo-Marxist doctrines. Temecula residents didn’t ask for it, didn’t vote on it’s creation and don’t want it. We are and have always been an inclusive and welcoming community. We do not need to have our children taught to judge or rank 2 one another or themselves based on ethnicity. What happened to the biblically grounded teachings of Rev Martin Luthier King - content of character not color of skin. These right and true ideals seem to have been cast aside in favor of low thinking. I have a proposal, rather than focusing on diversity, let’s as a city strive for excellence. Excellence is a standard that will challenge people of all backgrounds to achieve their highest potential. Shouldn’t that be our goal? In accordance with striving for excellence we need to be a city that does not fall prey to false beliefs based in fear. Mask wearing has now been proven to be useless in stopping the spread of COVID 19. I will link studies below. Not only do they fail at their intended purpose, they are causing physiological and psychological harm. Requiring mask wearing of City Council members only serves to perpetuate fear and false propaganda. Mask wearing should be at the discretion of the individual, not mandated. Continuing to keep our businesses and restaurants muzzled by masks and capacity restrictions is only serving to cast economic despair and fear on our population. States that chose to remain open throughout the pandemic have faired better than those that shut down in health and economic metrics. Temecula, the city of Excellence needs to be a shining beacon of freedom in our state. In closing I strongly encourage you to 1) Stop this unfounded persecution of Jessica Alexander - she represents our God centered values 2) Distance yourselves from forced reeducation training - this is downright evil - everyone is entitled to disagree 3) Immediately disband and defund the REDI Commission - they are a Trojan horse bent on destruction 4) Eliminate forced mask wearing at Council meetings and everywhere - it is false scientism, not science 5) Open Temecula. All businesses and restaurants for business as usual - science supports it and courage is contagious Thank you for your time, Christina Herington Links to mask studies: https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/ https://www.aier.org/article/masking-children-tragic-unscientific-and-damaging/ Please read this article by Christopher R Rufo for a better understanding of Critical Race Theory https://www.city-journal.org/how-to-fight-critical-race-theory 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:27 PM To:April Texeira Subject:RE: PAY RAISES Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: April Texeira < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:01 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: PAY RAISES I am writing to let you know that I am adamantly against Aaron Adams receiving any type of pay raise in the annual performance review. Some citizens of this town took a hard hit to their livelihood (job losses, small business closures) thanks to the year long shutdown/lockdown that was forced upon in the name of Coronavirus. Some of us have worked throughout the entire pandemic coming in contact with thousands of people and have yet to receive any type of incentive, raise, or hazardous pay. Until our city has returned to “normal”, I vote that no one in charge of the city nor their staff should receive raises. If we are handing out raises, let’s start with our actual public servants not making a fortune from taxpayer monies ... Law Enforcement. Since their raises are controlled by the county, we, the citizens, will gladly accept a refund in lieu of city officials raises. April Texeira Temecula resident since 2009 Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:13 PM To:eventsconcerts Subject:RE: Temecula City officials raises Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: eventsconcerts < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:09 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Temecula City officials raises Randi, i am not in support of any Temecula City officials of any money raises. Mr. Aaron Adams is to be included in this. For the last year Temecula businesses have been shut down. Sent from my Galaxy 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:13 PM To: Subject:FW: Comments for April 27 Temecula City Council Meeting ... Attachments:46F1275A-DAE8-400C-973B-83808FFBDAD7.jpeg; 26568EB1-4593-4A2E-BD20- CEE0941DA5CB.jpeg Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:18 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comments for April 27 Temecula City Council Meeting ... Dear Temecula City Council; The recent political attacks against a member of this city council for finding inspiration by a civil rights icon is much ado about nothing. This is all being orchestrated by self appointed so called “social justice” activists, like local leftist Julie Geary, in order to sow even more political division and angst within our community and throughout our country. That an elected member to the city council finds inspiration by the actions of Rosa Parks is laudable. Why is it now all of the sudden an elected city leader cannot cite the worthy actions of somebody like Rosa Parks? Is it because the council member is religious? Or patriotic? Or white? Or female? We are all Americans. We should all especially look to those noteworthy Americans for inspiration who have sacrificed and made great contributions to our country, particularly when a thought or idea in such political climates may go against the current conventional wisdom. 2 Julie Geary and her ilk demonstrate their ignorance by suggesting that there is no connection whatsoever between Rosa Parks’ stand for civil rights and the desire of millions and millions of fellow citizens to do away with restrictive mask edicts and social gathering bans as dictated by our California governor. The simple truth is that the US Supreme Court had ruled five times against our California governor because his diktats were indeed violating the civil rights of those Californians seeking to exercise their naturally ordained First Amendment freedoms. The Court has ruled time and time again that the governor cannot shut down churches and other social and political gatherings because he has no authority to do so. Similarly, Rosa Parks sought justice when she was denied her seat on a bus in the Democratically controlled Jim Crow South of last century. The Jim Crow policies that existed then were little more than government imposed diktats that were ruled as unconstitutional. If anything, Gavin Newsom’s anti-civil rights actions this past year should entitle him to join the ranks of fellow unconstitutional political demagogues like Woodrow Wilson, Orval Faunus and Bull Connor ... all Democrats. So instead of letting these race-baiters and political grievance hustlers continue to try to spread dissension, angst and recriminations throughout Temecula, let’s remember that we should honor, celebrate, invoke and seek inspiration from all American leaders and heroes of virtue, of conscience and of bravery. These fellow Americans come from all walks of life and from all natural origins of class, race and creed. Much like the banners honoring Veterans that are periodically displayed throughout Temecula, these honorees transcend race, class, gender and creed. I would highly recommend that local agitator and grievance-monger Julie Geary make an appointment with the REDI Commission so that she can learn some tolerance herself as well as understanding that race-baiting is just as bad as racism. Note: I have Bcc the e-mail contact of the REDI Commission so that they can perhaps expect a call from Ms. Geary in the near future for her remedial counseling. Lastly, I once again strongly encourage this esteemed city council to fully re-open City Hall and City Council meetings to the public as quickly as possible. City Council meetings should be done in person, in council chambers, with the public attending in person and interacting with the Council. Public comments should revert back to live in person comments only so that people cannot hide behind computers and/or anonymous internet names. This would also relieve our capable and dedicated City Clerk from reading these e-mailed and frequently anonymous, redundant and noxious comments into the record. Let the public read their own comments in person into the record. Besides ... you’ll probably also hear less from me as well, which may or may not put smiles on your faces. Thank you for your time and attention. Respectfully Submitted, Rick Reiss Paseo Del Sol Temecula, CA 92592 Sent from my iPad Reference: https://www.pe.com/2021/04/23/temecula-councilmember-compares-coronavirus-mask-rules-to-rosa-parks- struggle/ 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:11 PM To:Christine Fontes Subject:RE: Urgent Concerns Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Christine Fontes < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:21 PM To: Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Urgent Concerns Dear Temecula City Council and City Manager, I would like to address a few concerns of mine. 1. As I wrote to you in August, there is no need for the REDI Commission. This commission is a waste of time and taxpayers money. It is divisive and does not promote peace in our community. The whole premise on which the commission is based on is unfounded and riddled with lies. It is being pushed by a small group of people with an agenda that will ultimately destroy our city. The REDI Commission should be eliminated. 2. Jessica Alexander was duly elected to represent District 2 in the Temecula City Council. As such, she deserves your respect. Mrs. Alexander and many of her constituents have conservative values, however, that does not make them a racist. Please be aware that just because one throws the “R word” around to intimidate her or us, we will not stop proclaiming truth nor stop exposing the lies being perpetrated in our community. All smear campaigns against Mrs. Alexander, including the rhetoric that she is “culturally insensitive“, must immediately stop. Also, any pressure for her to have diversity training or forced mask wearing should not take place. 3. Speaking of masks, eliminate the mask mandate in the city of Temecula. There is plenty of evidence showing the harm wearing one can be and little evidence that it actually stops the transmission of COVID-19. Wearing a mask is basically just symbolism over substance. 2 4. Lastly, why are there still restrictions on businesses? It has been over a year now! Every business is essential because it provides the livelihood of our citizens. Open Temecula up now with no capacity or any other restrictions. Let our beautiful city fully thrive once again. Thank you, Christine Fontes Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:48 PM To: Subject:RE: Next meeting on Tuesday 27th 2021 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Brigitte < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:33 PM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Next meeting on Tuesday 27th 2021 Stop the required training of the REDI commission Do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission Immediately eliminate of Mask Wearing in Temecula, if people want to wear a mask great. There is no science or evidence that Mask stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements Also stop engaging with Jessica Alexander in regards to her choices and her votes. We and I have elected her as our representative in my district and am very disturbed by this. Our council is not representing our community and the spending of the city council has gone far beyond its duties. We are a conservative community and we need to preserve this. The REDI Commission is not the majority. 2 Brigitte Green 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:09 PM To:cjks1 Subject:RE: Public comment for next city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: cjks1 < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:37 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for next city council meeting “Hear ye hear ye, hard working tax payers of TEMECULA” On Tuesday April 27 city council will have a closed session for an annual performance evaluation AKA a salary raise for City Manager who already takes in over $412,000. Do you believe Aaron Adams should get paid more especially for never giving “We the People” a tax refund after all the parks, schools, city hall, etc... were closed all year long? He never missed a paycheck but the people sure did. Cease all raises to any staff. If the hard working citizens were told to lockdown and not make a livelihood why should the servants who work for us get raises? I also would like to thank council member Jessica Alexander for standing up for her those that voted for her. The majority of our city is still Conservatives....although the local social justice warrior group and some public officials are desperate to change that. Candice Temecula, CA 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:08 PM To:Ariella Brauer Subject:RE: Public Comment Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ariella Brauer < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment Randi, Please read my comments in the Public Comment section of the city council meeting on April 27, 2021. "I am against Aaron Adams or any other city official, receiving any sort of compensation increase. I have spoken to many local business owners and NOT ONE has heard from Aaron Adams to see how they are doing. Not one has been asked how Aaron Adams can be of service to them. But yet, Aaron Adams has control of how money is being spent." I will be on the Zoom and looking forward to hearing my comments being read in their entirety. -- Thank You, Ariella Brauer Virus-free. www.avast.com 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:07 PM To:Ryan Bradley Subject:RE: My deep concerns about Jessica Alexander as her constituent Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ryan Bradley < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:50 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: My deep concerns about Jessica Alexander as her constituent Good Afternoon City of Temecula- I would like to officially register my deep concerns over Jessica Alexander’s conduct both as a pattern and her more recent egregious comments. As someone who lives in Jessica’s district I attempted to engage her thru her public social media to ask her without judgement when she planned to take Temecula’s diversity & inclusion training. The comment was not accusatory nor was it condescending at all yet she felt the need to block me from interacting with her without any response. Given this it seems Jessica is unwilling to fulfill her basic duty to her constituents (or at least those she doesn’t deem as aligning with her views I’d surmise) and as such is unfit for her role. Beyond that individual issue her comments on Rosa Parks were abhorrent, deeply ignorant, factually wrong and have landed our town on the front page once again for racial insensitivity. We must do better as a town and that needs to start with removing Jessica Alexander from a role she is so clearly unfit for. Thank you for your time, Ryan Bradley 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:49 PM To:Dana Connolly Subject:RE: Comments for 4/27 City Council mtg. & input re: J. Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Dana Connolly < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 3:29 PM To: Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comments for 4/27 City Council mtg. & input re: J. Alexander As a resident of Temecula for over 33 years, and a retired TVUSD teacher of 22 years, I must express my shock and great disappointment with Councilwoman Jessica Alexander’s recent refusal to wear a mask and her comparison of herself to Rosa Parks. Does Councilwoman Alexander understand that her job is to represent everyone in our city, which means setting aside her personal and political leanings, and to do what is best for our entire community? Has she not seen the beautiful and touchin g white flags flown around the Duck Pond with the names of those who have passed from Covid? Ask those who submitted their loved ones’ names, if they wish masks had been worn by their loved ones and/or by those who exposed them to the virus, and I guarantee their answers would be, “Yes!” Does she realize that all teachers, students and staff must wear masks in our school district? Just like City Council members, teachers and staff are expected to model appropriate behavior, and one of those behaviors is to follow California Department of Public Health’s 2 mask mandate: https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DCDC/Pages/COVID-19/guidance- for-face-coverings.aspx Eighth grade Social Studies students understand that African-Americans were forced to sit at the back of the bus based on the color of their skin. How could Councilwoman Alexander compare her having to wear a simple mask during her work hours to the plight that Rosa Parks, and all African-Americans, have had to bare…and, continue to bare based on their skin color? Finally, regarding Councilwoman Alexander’s question, “When is enough enough?”, enough will be enough when the scientists and experts who study this deadly disease say it is safe and when California lifts the mandate. I think of the Jews who had to hide in attics during WWII, without heat, electricity, water, toilets, etc., 24/7 for months to save their lives and the lives of their families, and Councilwoman complains about wearing a simple, cloth mask while working and representing her city? Simply stated, her behavior is selfish and shameful. Councilwoman Alexander does not represent the Temecula I know and love, she represents herself, period. I hope she steps down and realizes that her job is for the people, not for her own wishes. If she does not step down, it is my hope that the council asks for her resignation. Mrs. Dana Connolly 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:48 PM To:myrthamdeleon Subject:RE: no increase for city employees. no real work on 2020. Lower city folks tax instead. Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: myrthamdeleon < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:01 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: no increase for city employees. no real work on 2020. Lower city folks tax instead. Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:47 PM To:Jason Wenning Subject:RE: No Raise! Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Jason Wenning < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:13 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: No Raise! There is no way in hell the City Manager should receive a raise! Thanks, Jay 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:47 PM To:Bonnie Clark Subject:RE: Raises Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Bonnie Clark < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:22 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Raises My husband and I want to put our input to you about a raise for city manager Aaron Adams. 1000% NO!!! He is already making a very high salary. He never missed a paycheck all year while our community businesses and families suffered. If anything we vote to refund taxes to the Temecula residents we pay for parks, schools, City Hall, etc that were all closed. Sincerely, Bonnie Clark Schedule a 15 minute Discovery Call Have a Better Retirement Wealth is the ability to fully experience life. Henry David Thoreau 2 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:47 PM To:Gary McIntosh Subject:RE: City manager raise Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Gary McIntosh < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:25 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City manager raise It has come to my attention that you are considering a raise for the Temecula city manager, and perhaps other employees. While I’m normally for employee raises, I believe it is inappropriate this year. The fact that so many businesses and individuals lost their livelihoods this past year, and in many cases are still out of work or on reduced incomes, giving the Temecula city manager a raise will send the wrong message to residents. As a show of support for those who have been financially hurt this last year, no raises should be given at this time. Our city manager already makes enough to carry through another year without a raise. Doing so will send a powerful signal of support for many residents of our fine city. -Gary L. McIntosh. Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 4:47 PM To:Sonia Perez Subject:RE: Public Comment April 27 meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sonia Perez < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 4:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment April 27 meeting Please read my comment below at the council meeting on April 27 Dear Elected City Servants, You were all elected to serve "We the People". Your resolve in resolution NO.2021, Section 2 A. number (1, 2, and 5) are not approved by me. That $74 million dollar building you all hide in belongs to the hard working citizens of Temecula and you have closed it for entry for an entire year. We will be present inside the building for the city council meetings without social distancing, without masks and no one has my permission to take my temperature. Impeding on my constitutional rights is a violation of the oath of office you have all taken and a violation against my rights and any other citizen who will not be allowed entrance inside the council meeting to address you all in person. Thank you and I will be on Zoom to listen to my comments being read allowed, Sonia Perez www.soniaperez.org 2 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:20 PM To:Lady Liberty Subject:RE: Meeting April 27, 2021 RE:Annual Performance Evaluation Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Lady Liberty < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:16 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Meeting April 27, 2021 RE:Annual Performance Evaluation To: Mayor Maryann Edwards Council Members Zak Schwank. James "Stew" Stewart. Jessica Alexander. Matt Rahn From: Jeannie Thompson Temecula, Ca 92591 RE: Pay Raises I am writing to you in regards to salary raises for the City Manager Aaron Adams and any other city official or worker for that matter. I am opposed to any salary raises to any city employee until all Temeculan residents are back at full employment as they were prior to this Covid-19 pandemic 2 and shut down. I think it is unreasonable as well as irresponsible to be giving "cost of living raises" or "salary raises" when many residents have yet to recoup from their financial hardships of unemployment as a result of the pandemic. as a home owner and tax paying resident of Temecula, it is my expectation that all vote NO on any form of pay raise at this time. Sincerely, Jeannie Thompson 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:34 PM To:ctmassa Subject:RE: Public Comment for City Council Meeting April 27 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: ctmassa < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:32 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment for City Council Meeting April 27 Hi Randi, I would like to submit the below for public comment for tomorrow's council meeting. I believe it will fall into general public comment as I did not see a corresponding agenda item. Thank you for all you do! _____________________________ Dear Temecula City Council, Maya Angelou said, “When you know better, you do better.” I would like to thank the council members who have educated themselves about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. It seems obvious that the tide in our town is turning, and even though Temecula is predominantly white, it is becoming increasingly less white, an increasingly filled with residents who care about inclusion and racial equity. On a run through my own Harveston neighborhood, there are more and more houses with signs and flags supporting black lives, LGBTQ rights, and faith in science. It’s encouraging. I also see actions and hear words from most of our council supporting the same. From most of our council, but not the whole council. I would like to commend our previous city council for creating the Commission for Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion. I would also like to commend the four members of our council who attended the April 6 Diversity workshop. Jessica Alexander was conspicuously absent from that workshop, with no explanation. Rather than make assumptions, I have reached out to her in two different forums to find out why she did not attend, and how she plans to make up for her absence, but she has yet to respond to me. Based on the council member’s campaign, I can only assume that she has no interest in true race relations, though I would welcome the opportunity to have her explain her absence in her own words. And based on the council member’s most recent comparison of her discomfort in the name of public safety, to 2 the civil rights movements of the ‘50s and ’60s, I can assume she is woefully in need of education on these matters, but she’s remained silent and appeared unwilling. This silence has not been my experience with the other members of city council. What I have experienced with the other members is a willingness to listen, a willingness to engage, and a willingness to put the needs of their constituents over their own personal agendas. I have had several conversations with each of the rest of you, either over e-mail, on Zoom, or in-person with masks and social distancing. And all without media fanfare. None of the rest of you felt the need to call a rally – you just talked to people. We have seen no such approach from Councilmember Alexander. Perhaps on the advice of counsel??? When we know better, we do better. We all remember Councilmember Stewart’s poor word choices last year. They were painful and, I’m sure, regrettable. However, what we have also seen from Councilmember Stewart is effort to try and do better. He is walking the walk. I know he has met one-on-one with diverse community leaders, and asked questions, and tried to get himself to a better place. He is willing to talk to his constituents and both answer and ask questions, even after a long-day personally serving at his brick-and-mortar businesses. What we are seeing from Councilmember Alexander is her making bold statements to rile up an audience, much like our former president, and only address the community via rallies that advance her personal agenda. As she is a member of a five-person council, this can’t be an effective way to govern. This is not the behavior of a team player. In closing, I would like to thank our four council members who promote public safety, equity, diversity, and inclusion in all matters. And for the council member who has yet to demonstrate this, I would hope that her fellow council members can educate her. And if she is unwilling or unable to receive that education, or to use her own words, “cannot and will not,” then my request would be at minimum to call for her censure for her insensitive and abhorrent comments at the last council meeting. At best, I would call for her resignation, as she does not appear to represent the whole of Temecula’s values. Thank you. _____________________ Thank you, Christine T. Massa 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 5:38 PM To:Suzanne Lane Subject:RE: Public Comment Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Suzanne Lane < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:37 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment Hello! Would you agree that discriminating against someone based on their race or skin color is “RACISM”? If so, is it only racist behavior if a white person discriminates against others? Is it not also racist behavior for blacks, Asians, Latinos, etc to discriminate against white people? This is so fundamental that I am scratching my head at what has happened to people’s common sense over the past year. Fear has really done a number on folks! If I constantly point out to my child that his friends are different races and have different skin color, then he will be aware and no longer just see his friend as a person. A child of God! In this country, we are to be a melting pot and not a divided pot! To quote Jesus Christ in Matthew 12:25, “Every city or house divided against itself will not stand!” We can appreciate differences without separating people because of it and causing more harm than good! Somebody is purposely trying to start a race war! Can you see it yet? It’s very obvious. You have radical leftists like BLM and groups supporting BLM that want to divide us under the auspice of equal rights but these bullies want to destroy society as we know it. I respectively demand that you stop the required training of the REDI commission. It does not represent the Citizens of Temecula and we did not vote for it and it is in line with BLM's values! The Citizens of Temecula love and respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official. We appreciate her values. We discourage the lies that she is culturally insensitive. This is not true! She is a woman of God! Just as Jesus said in Galatians 3:27-28 “For as many of you as were baptized into 2 Christ have put on Christ! There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is neither male nor female; for you are all ONE in Christ Jesus! In our modern society, this includes there is neither black nor white, Asian nor Hispanic etc. Jessica sees people as people and not races and colors! All are created in the image of God and we are not to discriminate! Embrace Jessica and the Citizens who elected her to office. I also respectfully demand that all mask requirements in Temecula cease and desist! It’s been a year! This needs to stop now! You must have seen by now the many studies that prove masks actually cause harm physically and mentally/emotionally! And there is no science or evidence that masks stop the transmission of Covid-19 all! If there are, please enlighten me! Also, please do your research on HCQ. It’s an absolute crime the way it has been covered and and labeled dangerous and ineffective! In reality, it’s a prentative and CURE for Covid-19. And, it is designated as an actual “VACCINE” as opposed to the clinical trials that are being pushed and touted as a vaccine for covid. These are experimental and do not carry the designation of Vaccine! Again, HCQ is a CURE for Covid. Isnt that wonderful? If people had access to HCQ, this all goes away! I wonder why the radical left wants to keep it out of the hands of the people? All businesses need to open up without restrictions. It’s absolutely unbelievable and greatly disappointing that this council would agree to keep the businesses and the good people of Temecula under this oppression. The Citizens of this city were told to lockdown and not make a living but our civil servants, who work for us are voting on their own raises??? Are you kidding me? I’m calling you out! I thought “Temecula Cares”! It is unconscionable! Cease all raises to any staff immediately! The radical left will not stop at lockdowns, masks, vaccines.....they want to destroy us! I am praying for open eyes and courage for this Council to do the right thing! Thank you! 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:20 AM To:Anthony Young Subject:RE: Please read at city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Anthony Young < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:50 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Please read at city council meeting Your council woman, Jessica Alexander, is what’s wrong with America. A snowflake that thinks she’s like no other snowflake and has the audacity to compare herself to a woman who is an icon of the movement to keep black people down for ages?!? That’s ridiculous and selfish and frankly shameful. The fact that she won’t wear a mask is why this stupid pandemic endures. If people like her would shut the hell up and wear a mask, and get vaccinated FFS, we could’ve been done with this long ago, but she thinks she’s special. She’s no more special than the 600k people who have died because of her actions that many other snowflake, babyshit conservatives have taken. While we’re at it, ask her if she feels persecuted because she’s Christian, White, or other. Then we will truly know why America is a sad sack of a country. Btw, I’m white, Texan, right leaning independent, Christian, and married to an immigrant, so she can go pound sand for a while. Tell her to scratch her little mask boo boo and it’ll feel better when people stop dying. You’re welcome. A concerned Texan for Temeculan prosperity Get Outlook for iOS 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:20 AM To:Jorri Caldwell Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander being unfairly targeted Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jorri Caldwell < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 5:54 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Fw: Jessica Alexander being unfairly targeted Temecula City Council Members: As a resident of District 2, It is my opinion that council woman Jessica Alexander is being unfairly targeted. She was airing her frustration and feelings (of which she has every right to) with mask wearing at the last council meeting. Her reference to Rosa Parks was in reference to Rosa Parks taking a stand in what she believed to be unjust treatment. In our hypersensitive climate people put meanings and references where there is none. Council woman Alexander was taking a stand against Mask wearing, nothing more. In my opinion it would behoove our city council to educate themselves and our city on mask wearing. Jessica is right there is no science to back up the mask wearing mandate. In fact many doctors have spoken out against it especially with people with underlying health conditions. It is my hope that her fellow council members will stand with Jessica and support her against all the hate messages, and those asking for her resignation. 2 Best Regards, Jorri Caldwell 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:20 AM To:Ana Neri Subject:RE: Letter to be read at City council Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ana Neri < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:13 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter to be read at City council Temecula City Council, I am completely appalled by Jessica Alexanders statement of comparing herself to Rosa Parks. Rosa Parks was discriminated and oppressed for the color of her skin. Does Jessica know she is not being oppressed, that no one is singling her out specifically, that there is a worldwide pandemic happening? How ill informed, completely ignorant and out of touch with reality does one have to be to make such abhorrent statements? This is a perfect example of someone throwing a tantrum over a policy made by medical and scientific experts who would know more than someone who has is not an expert in viruses, has the credentials nor is in a position to challenge them. Sit down and show humility to the people you represent. Opinions can run rampant but not in a public seat where you are representing people. Jessica Alexander is a public servant and making those statements shows how selfishly individualistic those comments are. They were all about her and how she feels about wearing a simple mask and kept repeating herself and not giving a real “excuse”. That is proof that she is in that seat to be self- serving. That is not the attitude to have when representing the citizens of Temecula. Where is servant leadership in any of her statements? There is division and contempt in her words and the way she carries herself. Clearly, she is not fit for the position and should resign immediately.There is also the question of where is her professionalism? Who throws these antics in public? City council is there to represent the people. It is not a self-serving, or agenda driven seat to further one’s personal interests or that of the donor’s who may have put you there. The city is a diverse group of people who have integrity, values, respect and compassion. Our public leaders should embody and exemplify these qualities. If that’s not what you are doing, then who are you truly serving? Thank you, 2 Ana Neri 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:19 AM To:Amanda Perez Subject:RE: Public Comment for April 27, 2021 City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Amanda Perez < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 6:50 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment for April 27, 2021 City Council Meeting Randi, Please read my comments in the Public Comment section for the city council meeting on April 27, 2021. "I am against Aaron Adams or any other city official, receiving any sort of compensation increase. I have spoken to many local business owners and NOT ONE has heard from Aaron Adams to see how they are doing. NOT ONE has been asked how Aaron Adams can be of service to them. Yet, Aaron Adams has control of how OUR money is being spent." I will be on the Zoom and looking forward to hearing my comments being read in their entirety. -Concerned Citizen 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:19 AM To:Nancy Young Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Nancy Young < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 7:34 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Dear City council members, I find Jessica Alexander's comments comparing herself to Rosa Parks and refusing to wear a mask during a city council meeting indefensible and completely selfish. Once again, embarrassing comments from a Temecula City council member are making not only national news, but now international news. We have all had to adjust to wearing masks during this pandemic. I wear one several hours every day while working. Am I Rosa Parks? No! I am doing my part to end this pandemic. What about surgeons who have to wear both n95 masks and surgical masks for hours on end while doing surgeries? Are they Rosa Parks? No, they are doing what is necessary to keep patients safe. She needs to resign now and if she won't resign you need to remove her. Nancy Young 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:18 AM To:Judith Ipema Subject:RE: Pay Raise Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Judith Ipema < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Pay Raise I just saw on Facebook that there will be a closed door meeting to discuss raising Aaron Adam’s salary. I had to read it twice. I couldn’t believe the audacity of any city official or employee asking for a raise on top of the exorbitant salaries that they are currently receiving; especially Aaron Adams. I think a salary of over $400,000 should suffice. Please understand that the people in our community are hurting as a result of the Covid pandemic. There are many who are food and shelter insecure because of lost wages. I vote NO raises. Judy Ipema 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:18 AM To: Subject:FW: Letter for April 27th City Council Meeting Attachments:CouncilLetter_Alexander_Kandus.docx Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julia Kandus < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 8:45 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter for April 27th City Council Meeting Hello, Attached is my letter to be read at the city council meeting on Tuesday, April 27th, 2021. Thank you, Julia Kandus Hello Temecula City Council, My name is Julia Kandus. I have been a Temecula resident since 1998. Equity for individuals in our community, as well as education and training for those in office in regards to inclusivity and diversity, is of utmost important. As a teacher, practicing and teaching equity is at the forefront of my life and classroom. I would hope that practices of equity and inclusivity are intertwined in the decisions and actions of elected officials as well. Jessica Alexander has not been reflecting these values, which are held by not only myself but also by many individuals in this community. This has been shown in her unwillingness to participate in the Diversity Training City Council meeting on April 6th (the workshop regarding Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Initiative), which she framed as a punishment rather than an opportunity to grow as a human being. Her ignorance has been clearly highlighted by her recent comparison of her refusal to wear masks to the civil rights demonstrations by the iconic Rosa Parks. This is racially insensitive to the struggle of Rosa Parks and people in the BIPOC (Black, Indigenous, and People of Color) community, who are still experiencing major racism and discrimination in our society today. Refusing to wear a mask puts others in danger who may be older, immunocompromised, etc. Wearing a mask shows empathy to others in our community, and the refusal to do so should not be the actions demonstrated by elected officials. Jessica Alexander has clearly shown ignorance, racial insensitivity, and a lack of empathy in her actions and statements. Alexander’s Facebook tagline includes the words “Unify, Educate, Serve”. Some of my BIPOC friends have told me that she not only does not unify this community, but her actions actually makes this city feel unsafe for them, their families, and their friends. Elected officials should make the people in their city feels safe, not the opposite. She has also clearly shown that she is not willing to educate herself, with her refusal to attend the REDI trainings. She does not set the example or reflect the values that many of us want to see in Temecula city leadership. Her actions leave me wondering, who is she truly trying to serve? We cannot allow elected officials to behave this way and ignore the struggles, trials, and tribulations of diverse voices in the community. I would like to see the city council address this abhorrent behavior from Jessica Alexander. I also greatly push for Jessica Alexander to sit down with members of the BIPOC community, receive the diversity and equity training she missed, and/or resign from office. Hate has no place in Temecula. Best regards, Julia Kandus, M.A. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:17 AM To:Jessica Christopher Subject:RE: Hate Speech, and Encouraging More Hate Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jessica Christopher < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:08 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Hate Speech, and Encouraging More Hate Importance: High Dear City Council Members and Staff, I am writing to express my concern that my values and the community's values are not being represented. I recently watched the new commission on diversity on the web, their first meeting. I found it more than disheartening. Those people are hell-bent on causing more harm than good. Only the chair seemed concerned about the people of this city. It was disgusting to see that she was the only one who thought a prayer to open the meeting would be good. What the heck?! This is what Temecula has become? These people want to use the positions you created to harm the people of the city that was clear by what I saw. Now I understand they are now attacking our newest city councilperson. When will this stop? I know one of them, and she has a chip on her shoulder the size of Half Dome. Why on earth would you put someone like that on a commission? One that the people of this city did not vote for or want. Then you put a person on the commission who was a major campaign supporter of Jessica Alexander's competitor? This is shameful, and I am so disappointed in this city we have lived here for over 20 years; it is fast becoming a place I do not recognize. With this kind of city management, it is clear why 2 California is losing so many people and why Texas, Montana, Florida, and Organ are gaining people. I have lived in the south as my husband was military, and I know what true redlining is; I know what actual racism looks like, I have seen and experienced it. I have seen people living in dirt floor hovels, and let me tell you, that is not HERE! We moved back to Temecula so we would not be near racist of any kind. This horrible commission you created is encouraging attacks and force race training. This has got to stop; that commission needs to be disbanded. The hate speech against Jessica Alexander must stop. I respectfully ask and respectively demand an action supported by the majority of like-minded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is 'culturally insensitive. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist are hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging; discourage it! No more' Mask Wearing' in Temecula; if people want to wear a mask, fine; if people do not want to wear a mask, that is fine too. Keep all businesses open with no restricted capacity requirements. The governor of South Dakota served her people well, Melissa Melendez post regularly the hospital capacity, and we were NEVER at capacity with our hospitals. Be a city council we can be proud of, stand up for the rights of the people, and do not bow to encouraging hate. Be a South Dakota governor. On a different note, if you are going to put flags up at the Duck Pond, can we get some flags for all the young people who committed suicide/overdosed during this lockdown and mask frenzy? We know of eight young people who paid a high price for the lockdown. One was a young engineer who had gotten his first job, he grew up in Temecula, and I know his mom and dad would love to see a flag for him. Red would be the color I would suggest for the flags. I am 100% sure when the count is done there will be more red flags than white. Jessica Christopher 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:16 AM To:Richard Kandus Subject:RE: Equity in our community Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Richard Kandus < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:21 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Equity in our community April 26, 2021 Dear Temecula City Council, I generally have a lot of respect for the members of Temecula City Council. You are performing an essential and at time, difficult job balancing various decisions regarding Temecula and the people who live here. However, I feel compelled to write and express my disappointment and discontent with one councilor, Jessica Alexander. I am appalled by Jessica Alexander’s recent behavior and comments. Black Lives Matter, the murder of George Floyd, and other members of the community have clearly indicated that w e, 2 as a society, need to take significant steps toward equity and fairness. Jessica’s refusal to educate herself with equity trainings is a strong indication of her need to attend such trainings. Further, her recent comments comparing her refusal to wear a face mask during a global pandemic to Rosa Parks is beyond insensitive, it is a sign of ignorance and lack of understanding of racial equality and the struggles toward that equality. Has she and other people who refuse to protect all of us through a face mask suffered hundreds of years of mistreatment, hate, prejudice, discrimination, and struggled to correct these societal injustices? Clearly, this is a rhetorical question, but one that she needs to understand before she makes any other ugly and erroneous comments. Jessica Alexander’s comments and behavior have clearly indicated that she is part of the problem we face today. I encourage her to be involved in extensive diversity and equity education with members of our diverse community. The Temecula City Council does not have room for anyone unwilling to work toward increased equity in our community. Sincerely, Richard Kandus 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:16 AM To:Tami Simms Subject:RE: City council letter Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tami Simms < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:30 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Re: City council letter Randi, Can you please read at the next City Council meeting on April 27th? Thank you for your time and attention to all of this! City Council members, I am calling for the resignation of Jessica Alexander. I have been a resident of Temecula for 33 years I am also a former Navy ICU nurse. I am and I hope you are as well, completely shocked and offended that Jessica Alexander, one of our City Council members is comparing wearing a mask to protect the health of our community to that of Rosa Parks actions after being forced to submit to institutional racism. It has not even been a year since another one of our city council members, James Stewart had to resign for making the comment “He did not believe there has ever been a good person of color killed by a police officer in Temecula“. How is it possible that we have not learned from that mistake? Yet here we are on April 13 during a general meeting of the Temecula City Council ,Jessica Alexander made the following statement “ look at Rosa parks, she was accommodated in the back of the bus and she finally took a stand and moved to the front because she knew that 2 wasn’t lawful, so she took a stand. At what point in time do we? I’m getting pushed to the back of the bus, this is what I feel like.” This is wrong on so many levels but the two most obvious are, as an ICU nurse, shame on any civic leader who refuses to follow the CDC guidelines of mask wearing in which to protect the public. We have now had 572,000 people die from this disease and she is unwilling to wear a mask that might save someone’s life? She is unfit to serve our community. She also needs to apologize for comparing herself to Rosa Parks who is a civil rights icon and fought against institutional racism. I understand Ms. Alexander failed to attend the equity and diversity training that all other councilmembers attended. It is very obvious that she needs this type of training much more than anyone. If she is unwilling to join her fellow council members, she needs to resign as she has shown she is not a team player. I would also like to point out that Jessica Alexander advertised and promoted the Jan 6th inserection 92 times on her Facebook page. Anyone who was part of or promoted the insurrection does not deserve a seat on our city Council. I know we are better than this, I urge you to consider and encourage Ms. Al exander to step down for the greater good of our community. Ms. Alexander does not have what it takes to be a representative of our community and as a fellow Veteran I am embaresed by her words, her actions, and encourage her to do the right thing and resign. Thank you for your time, Tami Sims Temecula Resident of 33 years Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:16 AM To:Ira Robinson Subject:FW: Letter Re Jessica Alexander and Rosa Parks Attachments:Letter Re Jesica Alexander and Rosa Parks.pdf Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ira Robinson < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:38 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter Re Jessica Alexander and Rosa Parks Madam City Clerk, The attached message is for reading during the “Public Comments” portion of the Council’s April 27 meeting. As I will be away from home most of the day, it is requested that you acknowledge receipt of this message ASAP. Thanks. Ira April 27, 2021 Madam Mayor, members of Council and staff. This message is submitted in connection with the Council’s April 13 agenda item concerning Council Member Jessica Alexander’s request that they consider whether and when the Council should return to in person public meetings. First, I would like to thank Mayor Edwards, Mayor Pro Tempore Rahn and Council Members Schwank and Stewart for their thoughtful consideration of the request. In connection with Council Member Alexander’s approach – which struck me as being highly politically motivated, I believe it must be said that her statement comparing the late Ms. Rosa Parks’ situation with hers was insensitive, inappropriate and in almost every respect historically inaccurate. Only Ms. Parks’ name and the word “bus” were accurate. I also found it remarkable that Ms. Alexander has already (quote) “had enough” of working in a virtual environment after only a few days on the very job she campaigned through months of pandemic to win. And when it comes to having “had enough”, Ms. Alexander obviously needs to be informed and helped to understand that it took Ms. Parks almost a lifetime of exposure to tyrannical treatment and unjust laws before she finally reached the point where SHE had “had enough”. One has to wonder how Ms. Alexander reached having (quote) “had enough” after less than one hundred days on the Council. An agenda perhaps?? Hopefully, Ms. Alexander’s future public utterances - on this or any subject – will be more responsibly researched, and more tastefully and respectfully conceived and delivered. Finally, I would like to share a comment I overheard about Ms. Alexander’s unfortunate Rosa Parks comparison. The speaker said: “Talk about false equivalency! One would think the Councilwoman would be content to simply give voice to her extraordinary selfishness. But no! She has to flaunt her ignorance too.” So that’s it. . . . . . Thank you for the opportunity to express these views. Ira Robinson Ira Robinson Temecula 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:16 AM To:DANIEL WARNER Subject:RE: Pay increase Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: DANIEL WARNER < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 9:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Pay increase Are you kidding me? Arron Adams needs a pay increase? No, No, No. Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:15 AM To:jennifer scharf Subject:RE: Public Comments Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: jennifer scharf < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 10:33 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments Good Evening Temecula City Council, I am writing because I am outraged and sickened by Council Member Alexander's unmitigated audacity. The temerity of someone of her privilege- a middle class white woman who holds a position of power in one of the safest cities around- to compare themselves to someone who was sent to jail fighting against Jim Crow, segregation, and systemic racism because she- like the rest of us- has been asked to care about our fellow citizens and where a mask is so gross, so disgusting, and frankly, so disconcerting that she needs to resign and spend her time learning about history, which she is twisting to serve her own agenda. Her histrionics regarding a simple, albeit effective, (notice the lack of a significant flu season this past year?) preventive measure such as wearing a mask shows that Council Member Alexander lacks a basic understanding of science and the fortitude to do what is right for her 2 community. It is abundantly clear that the only reason she is on the Temecula City Council is to forward her QOP beliefs and not to serve her constituents. The silence of the rest of the council when Council Member Alexander uttered her ridiculous comparison was deafening and disappointing. Your silence is complicity. It is time for the rest of the council to stop coddling her and stand up for the people they swore to serve. I urge you to condemn her remarks. Thank you for your time. Jennifer S. -- Best Regards, Jennee Scharf secretary@ tvdems.org TV Dems Secretary Events & Fundraising Committee Member 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:15 AM To:Donna Mollet Subject:RE: shameful salary increase for city manager Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Donna Mollet < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 10:46 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: shameful salary increase for city manager $412,000.00 yearly proposed salary for Aaron Adams, can this be true? Disgusting. MORE than a US president earns?? NOT ACCEPTABLE 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:15 AM To: Subject:RE: Please REJECT the notion of REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 11:08 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Please REJECT the notion of REDI Commission Dear Temecula City Council Members: My name is Judy Smith. I've been a resident of this wonderful Valley for 33+ years and am BEYOND CONCERNED for my beautiful City of Temecula. I will get right to the point. I am strongly against any REDI training whatsoever and did not vote for such a commission because I do NOT agree with what it represents. I believe it to be divisive, because it infers that some sort of racial problem exists WHICH IT DOES NOT! We are a community of supportive neighbors who get along and help one another. We always have! We are 2 people of all colors and nationalities who have been coexisting for decades quite successfully and we do not need a REDI commission, not now, not EVER!!! Quit stirring the pot of hatred with such a waste of our tax dollars. STOP this nonsense and get to work on what the citizens of Temecula really want and need! We want Jessica Alexander to be allowed to do her job and to be honored and respected for the immensely talented and cherished City Council member that we voted her to be! Her Christian values, her outstanding character, her upright lifestyle and hardworking ethics are why we love her and why we voted for her! The hateful lies against her are a disgrace! Reject such hatred. Stop at once this despicable false chatter and stop at once any further spread of it by standing up for truth instead! Additionally, I want the City of Temecula to cease the mask mandate and allow ALL Businesses to fully open and run at full capacity mask- FREE! We as citizens are intelligent enough to decide for ourselves whether we want to wear a mask or not. We abhor and reject being forced to wear one because each of us who are healthy do not need to wear a mask in the first place! We know the science and recognize they are not safe, nor do they prevent disease. Stop this nonsense please! Thank you for taking the time to read my sincere concerns. Mrs. Judy Smith ( 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:15 AM To:Sam Smith Subject:RE: REJECT any/all forms of the REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sam Smith < Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 11:16 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REJECT any/all forms of the REDI Commission Dear City Council Members: My name is Brian "Sam" Smith. My wife Judy and I have been residents of this wonderful Valley for 33+ years. We are BEYOND CONCERNED for our beautiful City of Temecula. Allow me to get right to the point. I am strongly against any REDI training whatsoever and did not vote for such a commission because I do NOT agree with what it represents. I believe it to be divisive, because it infers that some sort of racial problem exists WHICH IT DOES NOT! We are a community of supportive neighbors who get along and help one another. We always have! We are 2 people of all colors and nationalities who have been coexisting for decades quite successfully and we do not need a REDI commission, not now, not EVER!!! Quit stirring the pot of hatred with such a waste of our tax dollars. STOP this nonsense and get to work on what the citizens of Temecula really want and need! We want Jessica Alexander to be allowed to do her job and to be honored and respected for the immensely talented and cherished City Council member that we voted her to be! Her Christian values, her outstanding character, her upright lifestyle and hardworking ethics are why we love her and why we voted for her! The hateful lies against her are a disgrace! We ask that you reject such hatred. Stop at once this despicable false chatter and stop at once any further spread of it by standing up for truth instead! Additionally, I want the City of Temecula to cease the mask mandate and allow ALL Businesses to fully open and run at full capacity mask- FREE! We as citizens are intelligent enough to decide for ourselves whether we want to wear a mask or not. We abhor and reject being forced to wear one because each of us who are healthy do not need to wear a mask in the first place! We know the science and recognize they are not safe, nor do they prevent disease. Stop this nonsense please! Thank you for taking the time to read my sincere concerns. My wife has submitted a like-minded letter expressing exactly the same strong concerns. Respectfully, Brian "Sam" Smith 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:14 AM To:Meri Rosa-Pyrce Subject:RE: Closed Meeting - City Manager Salary Increase Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Meri Rosa-Pyrce < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 12:26 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Closed Meeting - City Manager Salary Increase Just heard through the community grapevine that there is a closed meeting scheduled to give the City Manager, Aaron Adams, a salary increase from his already ridiculous salary package of over $412,000…this is OUTRAGEOUS! Not only for the fact that this a closed meeting where the tax payers of this city are not allowed to attend to voice our opinion (more like frustration), but the fact that a salary increase would even be an agenda item to increase the already outrageous compensation package Mr. Adams is making in these difficult times is beyond unacceptable. Let me remind you that the citizens of this city have been out of work, losing our businesses, our schools have been closed and children were forced to do Zoom schooling where they sat at home depressed and learned absolutely nothing, we couldn’t use the city’s recreational facilities we pay for and never got a tax credit for not being able to use them, taxes in this city in all categories are unbearably high, and this individual deserves a salary increase…for what? How shameful. As a tax-paying citizen of this city, I am not happy with this, and I guarantee you that I am not the only one. Meri Rosa-Pyrce 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:14 AM To:G NEAR Subject:RE: Public Comment- Non agenda related Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: G NEAR < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:33 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Greg Butler <greg.butler@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org> Subject: Public Comment- Non agenda related My name is George, sovereign, and I am a People of California. I have a few issues to address. This meeting is being conducted utilizing teleconferencing consistent with State of California Executive Order N-29-20, dated March 17, 2020. According to California Government Code 8627.5-B "The Order shall remain in effect until the order or regulation is rescinded by the Governor, the Governor proclaims the termination of the state of emergency, or for a period of 60 days, whichever occurs first. It is my wish and I require the next public meeting to be in-person. Follow the law! We move on to California Civil Code 51. Which reads... All PERSONS in California are free and equal, 2 and are entitled to the full and equal accommodations, advantages, facilities, privileges, or services in all business establishments of every kind whatsoever. Being served outside is against the law. Just yesterday, I came to the Temecula city hall to conduct business. I calmly and respectfully spoke with three employees outside. This led me being denied access to the Temecula City Hall to conduct business. I was then intimidated when City Hall management contacted the Riverside Sheriff Department. Two officers arrived and surrounded me. You're probably wondering what did I do to require law enforcement intervention? The answer is ....... I REFUSED TO CONSENT TO AN ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE. I did not allow my temperature to be taken. I'm guilty of defended the 4th amendment. Policy does not supersede the law! City Hall policies violates California laws. IN CLOSING.... GOVERNMENT CODE -11120. It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. YOU SERVE US! Thank you for your time. George, A People of California FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Ralph Civil Rights Act of 1976. Tom Bane Civil Rights Act. Quo Warranto Court of Records 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:14 AM To:Eva Smith Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander Needs To Apologize to BIPOC Community and Take Diversity and Inclusion Training or RESIGN Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Eva Smith < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 7:48 AM To: Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Cc: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika.ramirez@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander Needs To Apologize to BIPOC Community and Take Diversity and Inclusion Training or RESIGN Good morning Mayor and City Council members, I am also copying Randi Johl and Erika Ramirez to request that my statements be read into record respectfully at the City Council meeting and REDI commission. My name is Eva Smith, I am a registered voter, retired Wireless Communications Engineer, Community Volunteer, Faithful voter and a proud resident of Temecula for over 23 years. Serving the City of Temecula is a great honor and should be revered as such. During the past two months I have seen a lot of growth in our City's leadership thru the formation of the REDI Commission, a Diversity and Equity workshop and Temecula City Council's open discussions on face masks mandates and best practices to keep our community safe. I commend you for having several transparent public discussions. However, during the last Temecula City Council meeting, City Council member Jessica Alexander 2 compared her disapproval for Riverside County health orders to Civil Rights icon Rosa Parks and her remarks are problematic. As a concerned citizen, I demand action against Council member Jessica Alexander for her culturally insensitive and tone deaf remarks comparing her unwillingness to protect her colleagues from the spread of coronavirus by wearing a face mask to Civil Rights icon Rosa Park's segregation protests. I would also like to request a public statement on whether or not the City of Temecula has a social media policy for City Council members. How does the City of Temecula protect itself from liability when events, messages and content posted on social media platforms, blogs, newsletter by public officials is perceived as being made on behalf of the City of Temecula or organized by the City. What is the liability the City of Temecula has when City officials post, promote and spread disinformation and misinformation? Where does the City of Temecula draw the line? As the wife, daughter, sister and sister in law of military veterans who have proudly served our country in all branches of the Armed Forces, I also find it concerning that Council Member Jessica Alexander fails to follow County, State and Federal guidelines to protect our citizens, teachers, students and first responders. Especially since she is also a veteran. There is no comparison between Rosa Parks refusal to give up her seat on a bus to fight racial segregation on public transportation and Council member Jessica Alexander's tone deaf statements. Rosa Parks refusal to give up her seat was just the beginning of a twelve month boycott. After the segregation laws were made unlawful Black teens were beaten, shot and churches were bombed. It also resulted in years of hardship for Rosa Parks as she received death threats, lost her job, her marriage, her home and financial stability in the wake of the Montgomery boycotts. History teaches us that on that faithful day, it wasn't a planned protest, it was a day when she was burdened, pained and angered by the details of Emmet Till's death and systemic racism which failed to hold his murderers accountable. It's shameful and disheartening that Council member Jessica Alexander would compare her refusal to follow social distancing and face mask health orders to the pain, brutality and injustice suffered by segregated Black Americans during the Jim Crow era. There is no comparison. Jessica Alexander's statements show a disregard for Black American's pain, suffering and systemic racism then and today. Council member Jessica Alexander has also spread COVID misinformation during the City Council meeting with statements that minimize the severity 3 of the widespread coronavirus pandemic by falsely stating that "coronavirus has a 99.9% recovery rate" and that "coronavirus cured the flu". These statements show a disregard for human life, health orders and safety of immune compromised constituents, especially those who have not fully recovered from coronavirus, but continue to experience fatigue, loss of smell, loss of taste, brain fog, heart, lung damage and cognitive disfunction months after reporting their first symptoms. Jessica Alexander's callous statements disregards the lives of over 572,000 victims who died from COVID. Coronavirus is REAL. Coronavirus also took the life of many of my loved ones. Coronavirus severely impacted my immediate family members, including my mother and father. Unfortunately, my young nephew is still suffering with COVID long-hauler symptoms including body aches, the loss of smell and taste. These statements of misinformation and disinformation are not isolated incidents. Since taking office, Council member Jessica Alexander was also absent from a recorded virtual Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Training workshop which shows disregard for the BIPOC community members which she serves. Especially since the City of Temecula made a commitment to raise awareness and educate themselves on the intersection of race, equity and systemic racism. Council member Jessica Alexander has also made questionable statements in public settings via social media. Can public officials use their positions and title as a public servants to organize, promote and speak at events that may be perceived as organized by the City of Temecula ? Can public officials align themselves with organizations which fuel distrust in authority? Here. Here. Here. Is this something that is sanctioned or condoned by the City of Temecula? Can a public servant use their title, position, digital platforms and social media platform with their City of Temecula titles to fuel rejection of County healthcare policies, mistrust of authority and still serve her constituents in a nonpartisan manner? I demand that the city of Temecula investigate her questionable statements and take necessary action against Jessica Alexander. A s a representative of the City of Temecula, h er spread of COVID misinformation and disinformation is dangerous, violates human rights and does not align with the core values we seek from nonpartisan public servants. I also demand that Jessica Alexander sit with members of the BIPOC community to discuss Rosa Park's legacy and f ormally receive the Diversity and Equity training she missed in public. There is no place for Hate in Temecula. There is no place for cultural insensitive statements and spread of disinformation by 4 public officials. If the City of Temecula has an existing policy on City of Temecula public servant use of Social Media and Digital platforms policy please make it public and provide more information of whether or not city officials can participate, organize, promote, lead and speak at events which promote human rights violations and fuel mistrust in public offices? Temecula City Council Member Jessica Alexander needs to represent all her constituents or RESIGN! Human lives are at Stake! Sincerely, Eva Smith Questionabale statements, acts : 1. Jessica Alexander absent from the Diversity Training City Council Meeting April 6th (Workshop Regarding Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Initiative). 2. Jessica Alexander's disrespectful and tone deaf statements at Temecula City Council Meeting - April 13, 2021. This is a caption of Jessica Alexanders statements made: “Look at Rosa Parks … She finally took a stand and moved to the front, because she knew that that wasn’t lawful. It wasn’t true,” Alexander said, according to a videotape of the meeting. “So she took a stand. At what point in time do we? … I’m getting pushed to the back of the bus. This is what I’m telling you I feel like.” Alexander added that she “cannot” and “will not” wear a mask. “So it’s not that I want to be disrespectful,” she said. “But the fact of the matter is when is enough enough?” 3. Jessica Alexander promoting event that fuels facemask disregard and mistrust in authority on politician page. and personal page. 4. Rosa Parks Was My Aunt. It's Time to Set the Record Straight The quiet, tired seamstress caricature isn't her real story. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:14 AM To: Subject:RE: Opposing Raise Increase For Aaron Adams Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:10 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Opposing Raise Increase For Aaron Adams So it is being said that On Tuesday April 27 city council closed session for an annual performance evaluation AKA a salary raise for City Manager Aaron Adams who already takes in over $412,000. He makes more than the president! How can that be justified for a servant of such a small city without their own police department to protect the residents/ people who pay the salaries!? This is ridiculous, outrageous, greedy and poor management of our hard earned money. Temecula has suffered greatly over the last year and a half. Crime is way out of control. Half of the mail boxes ( or more) have been and continue to broken into. theft is up, home break in, cars stolen from people’s driveways, etc!!! The homeless situation is disgusting and the fact the city is allowing homeless to be bussed in from San a diego to dirty the city, causing even more crime is totally frustrating! We need our own police department! That is where any “extra” money should be going to. We will all be demanding this soon. There are not nearly enough CHP or rented Sherrif’s to handle the crime and the abundance of rude and careless drivers / traffic violators. And the city keeps building more low income housing .... what are you servants who are working for “We the People” doing to keep this city of ours peaceful , and to grow, and be a point in the map where people are drawn to come for vacation. A city where we can feel safe a “proud” to live. Temecula is losing out to criminals who run freely by committing crimes and either not going to jail or are back on the street to commit crimes the next day. There are too many people renting out their homes (period) and to criminals who commit crimes and disturb residents and even caused shootings ( on more than a few occasions) and now we are seeing greedy public servants. i have only lived here for 4 1/2 years and have watched Temecula go down hill . we moved from Los Angeles to get away from all that. Now it’s all even closer to home. The community is going to voice their opinions, they /we are getting fed up. 2 oh... and speed limits are way too high! they need to be lowered. Butterfield , Rancho Cal and Temecula Parkway are not a freeways. people are driving 70 miles an hour on these streets. Too many reckless snd careless drivers causing accidents. Respectfully, Dawn 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:07 AM To: Subject:RE: Rosa Parks comment Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ann Fedorchak < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 8:10 AM To: Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org> Cc: Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Rosa Parks comment Good morning, I want to express my concern for the remarks made by Jessica Alexander comparing Rosa Parks and wearing masks. Will anyone be beaten, killed arrested or denied access to community facilities because they do not wear a mask? NO. Businesses have a right according to current supreme court rulings to access to services and property they own. Thankfully they are following CDC guidelines in most cases. Ms. Alexanders hyperbole is negatively impacting the health and welfare of our community by promoting such ludicious comparisons. Wear a mask, don’t wear a mask, nothing happens except you are showing consideration for your fellow citizens, family member, and self. Perhaps Ms. Alexander needs to take a stroll by The Pond. Thank you for your time. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:03 AM To:Jodie Christopher Subject:RE: Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jodie Christopher < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:01 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Dear City Council Members and Staff, I’m writing to express my concern that my values and the values of much of the community aren’t being represented. I’d appreciate your actions on the following: 1. Last year the REDI Commission was formed even though a large majority of citizens in Temecula were not in support of this commission. The council’s actions did not reflect the position of its citizens. I watched the last REDI commission meeting online and was very confused at their purpose. I thought this Commision was created to further the equality and inclusion of all to our community Having lived in Temecula and Invested in the community with two businesses, and this commission did not make me or my wife feel included. I respectfully ask and respectively demand, an action supported by the majority of like minded Temecula Citizens, the Temecula City Council to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. 2. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to Office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. The hate speech and untruths leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop. This is our city, collectively. I support 2 Jesssica Alexander. The smear campaign being leveled against her must be renounced and she must be defended as a valued member of our community and respect for Jessica Alexander as our elected official must be defended. We as a community must discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She has the Judeo-Christian values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that our community is racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! V/r, Jodie Christopher 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:29 AM To:Kelly Subject:RE: Nzo to city Pay raises Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Kelly < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:21 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Nzo to city Pay raises To whom it may concern There is No Way, that any city employees should be getting any pay raise at this time. DO NOT think for a moment that this is okay with the people of Temecula. We have all lost so much this last year and are still struggling to make ends meet. Once again NO! Nobody gets any pay raise. Such an insult to us all that this should even be a consideration at this time 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:48 AM To:Tammy Acme Subject:RE: Comment for 4-27-2021 council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tammy Acme < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 9:30 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment for 4-27-2021 council meeting I can not believe we have such an ignorant person representing the Temecula City Council. Jessica Alexander is an embarrassment to the city of Temecula if she doesn't understand the history of the civil right movement. Words matter. This pandemic is going to keep everyone from going back to business as usual if selfish people like Ms. Alexander keep denying science. She's basically thumbing her nose at every white flag around the duck pond. She clearly does not care about the families in Temecula that have lost loved ones to COVID-19. She doesn't care about our health care professionals taking care of those fighting COVID in our hospitals and long term care facilities. Shame on your Jessica Alexander. RESIGN 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:47 AM To:P J Subject:RE: Public comment for April 27 meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: P J < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:29 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for April 27 meeting Good evening, mayor and council, thank you for allowing me time to speak tonight. I won’t belabor the point that Jessica Alexander is unfit for our Temecula City Council, she seems to be doing a fine job of hammering home that truth as it is. I’ve no doubt she will continue to double down on her behavior tonight, revealing herself to be the sycophantic zealot that she is — not working for the city’s residents, but for herself and her tight circle of insurrectionist pretenders. This council is all about you, Jessica, right? Keep dragging the city and this council through the mud with your Q-conspiracy rantings and false — and racist — equations. Congrats on making Temecula a laughing stock for another 15 minutes, amiright Stew? Here’s to hoping Cap’n Zach descends upon Alexander’s next planned Misinformation Fest with the same fury that he had when attacking and threatening the gathering of BLM protesters at the Duck Pond back when they were demanding — and since validated conviction — of the murderer, Inmate Derek Chauvin. Wait — if Americans don’t have freedoms, how on earth would it be possible for them to gather on public property in a planned event so freely disseminated? 2 Looking forward to the rubber bullets and the tear gas, Cap’n. For those planning to attend the event — pairing your Jean Shorts and White New Balances with an American Flag as a shirt is a clear violation of the Flag Code — I’m talking to you Reiss and Kowell. The fact that neither of you quote-unquote patriots have the sense to respect the flag of this country as you adorn it with images of an Adderall addicted reality TV star and allow it to be defaced with discolorations of the stripes while hanging it from the back of your filthy lifted F-150 — speaks volumes. Enough — respect the flag — don’t use it as a cover for your thinly-veiled racism and ignorance. It insults me, it insults each and every one of us. Listen, it’s time for the city council to get back to the business of creating a treasure map for driving lanes around the Vail Ranch loop, determining whether speed bumps in Meadowview will cause an increase in minivan wheelies, and ALL CAPS figuring out how to make it so it doesn’t take me 45 minutes to drive to Murrieta! Last thought … make Temecula City Council boring again! PJ in Temecula 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:47 AM To:Jennifer Reeves Subject:RE: Letter for council meeting. Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Jennifer Reeves < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:39 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter for council meeting. From Jennifer Reeves of the Temecula Valley When I saw the city council meeting with the comments from Jessica Alexander I was honestly taken aback to hear her try to compare the serious oppression of which Rosa Parks faced, with her being asked to wear a mask and/or stay home and attend meetings via an online video platform. Her comments were tone deaf and show her lack of true understanding of what so many people of color have had to live through even today right here in Temecula Valley. This is sadly not the first time this city council has had this occur, but there has been progress made by both the city and the other city council member to learn and take in a different perspective. This does not seem to be something Jessica Alexander is willing to do. I respectfully ask that she be required to take the Race, Equality, and Leadership training that every other member of the city council, as well as other people from the city has taken, or that she step down as a member of the city council. Her comments can not serve as a reflection of what this valley stands for. Thank you 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:54 AM To:Troy Chavez Subject:RE: Meeting Tonight Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Troy Chavez < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:51 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Re: Meeting Tonight Thank you, Mrs. Johl. See below for my (less than three minutes) public remark: I want to say first, this is not a call for Jessica Alexander to resign. Instead, this is a call for a public official – representing more than one demographic – to educate herself whole heartedly on a topic she obviously does not understand. I won’t even call it a mistake. We can call it a “misunderstanding” of American history. Rosa Parks represented a minority, yes, but that minority of people had much more severe problems to face then whether to wear a mask – that everyone – is told to wear. I don’t see hoses being sprayed on no-mask supporters, either. The separation between the Honorable Councilwoman Jessica Alexander and Rosa Parks couldn’t be starker. I understand she has supporters who believe her words carried zero weight, but that is just representative of the deep divisions living and thriving in our country and town. I ask both parties to not find fervor, anger, or to chastise – but rather to – as a community, come together and have the important conversations we preach about; so, we can build bridges of understanding, not bombastic language furthering us apart. I will say this, however, if Councilwoman Alexander doubles down on her remarks, then the belly of the beast will have presented itself – or herself – for the whole community to see. We must use this situation as an opportunity to learn. There are plenty of other issues to grand stand about. -- Let me know if there are any further steps or questions. 2 Warm regards, Troy Chavez On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 10:35 AM Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> wrote: Yes, you just have to send in an email to me based on the notice on the top of the agenda (attached). Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Troy Chavez < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 10:22 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Meeting Tonight Hello Mrs. Johl, Are we still allowed to send in email responses for public comment? What is the current process? Warm regards, Troy Chavez 3 ( -- Troy Chavez ( 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 12:18 PM To:Ed Dool Subject:RE: COUNCILWOMAN'S JESSICA ALEXANDER WORDS Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Ed Dool < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 11:54 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: COUNCILWOMAN'S JESSICA ALEXANDER WORDS As a long time resident of district 2, and a supporter of Councilwoman Jessica Alexander I and others in are district are appalled that out of town residents are trying to use hateful and hurtful words and twist them into hate speech against her , We would like the city clerk to make sure as in regular city counsel meetings. that when she reads public comments that she gives names. and cities where there coming from and if it's not on the e-mail's it should not be entered in to the record., Thank you Ed Dool 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 12:21 PM To:Kaitey Elliott Subject:RE: randi.johl@temeculaca.gov Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Kaitey Elliott < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 12:17 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: randi.johl@temeculaca.gov Dear City Council ~ I love Temecula. I am excited to see that Temecula recognizes the importance of DEI, and celebrates Temecula's multicultural history. Jessica Alexander, refusing to show up to DEI training is an insult to the people you represent. Jessica, your statements about wearing a mask, and being sent to the back of the bus are hurtful, insensitive, and disrespectful. To refuse to attend DEI training, and THEN make a comment comparing being asked to wear a mask to the experience of Rosa Parks, shows you have zero understanding of what it means to be discriminated against based on your race. You can take a mask off or put one on, black and brown men and women cannot change the color of their skin to escape racism that happens here in Temecula. Temecula is full of diversity! Dozens of studies show the success organizations have when they choose to embrace DEI. This council is no different. Temecula City Council we need you to step up. We need people who can celebrate Temecula's differences, not make them insignificant. We need a team who can recognize that DEI is not a partisan issue, DEI and cultural intelligence is a way of better loving our neighbors, and the people we do life with. Thank you, Kaitey Elliott 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:22 PM To:Jeanine Robinson Subject:RE: Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jeanine Robinson < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:17 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Hello, I am Jeanine Robinson, Temecula resident since 2016 and mother to two young children. First, I would like to thank the council members who have continuously put the safety and health of our community first, ahead of your own opinions and agenda. Jessica Alexender's comments at the last meeting that she "cannot and will not" wear a mask horrified me for multiple reasons. Wearing a mask during a pandemic is the bare minimum to protect ourselves and one another from a potentially deadly respiratory virus. The ophthalmology office, where I worked for five years, required patients who came in sick to wear a disposable mask to protect staff and other patients. My physician required me to wear a mask when I needed to see her for any contagious illness. It is actually covered by OSHA. So what I hear Jessica saying is that she "cannot and will not do the bare minimum" to protect the community that she supposedly represents. I find it absolutely abhorrent that the inconvenience and discomfort of something so small and simple is not worth my life. Now that may sound dramatic, but this is the reality for both me and my three-year-old daughter. I am severely asthmatic. My lungs are weak and I take multiple medications every day to be able to breathe like your average person. Covid, being a pulmonary virus, could very realistically end my life and leave my children motherless. What's more, even with my breathing limitations, I am an athlete. I snowboard and compete in obstacle course races and 5k runs. Many times I do so while wearing a face-covering for protection against wind and cold, or dust. I carry a travel breathing treatment to do so, and often have to stop my activity to use it, but I am able to do these things with my face covered. I can assure you, these activities take a lot more energy, especially with a cloth face covering, than going shopping or stopping for a coffee. I have a difficult time understanding how someone with both military and police force training cannot find the discipline or wherewithal to do so for the amount of time it takes to go grocery shopping. 2 My three-year-old is not asthmatic, but she is a Type 1 Diabetic. For those unfamiliar with T1D, any illness, as small as the common cold, puts diabetics at risk of going into diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) which can cause cerebral and pulmonary edema and organ damage. Combine the risk of DKA with the potential long-term organ effects of covid, and I am looking at multiple levels of danger for my toddler. Because a mask is too much to ask. Or, my children and I ought to be confined to our home because somehow that is more reasonable than adults wearing a mask during a pandemic. This has been our life for the last year, due to the politicization of masks and stances like Jessica Alexender's. Knowing that not only community members, but now definitely someone who sits on our city council, cannot take families like mine into consideration before making such harmful and insensitive comments reveal that Temecula may not be the place I hoped it was. Thank you, Jeanine Robinson 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:20 PM To:John Andrews Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander and Mask Choice Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: John Andrews < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:58 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander and Mask Choice Dear Randi, The recent political attacks against a member of this city council for finding inspiration by a civil rights icon is much ado about nothing. This is all being orchestrated by self appointed so called “social justice” activists, like local leftist Julie Geary, in order to sow even more political division and angst within our community and throughout our country. That an elected member to the city council finds inspiration by the actions of Rosa Parks is laudable. Why is it now all of the sudden an elected city leader cannot cite the worthy actions of somebody like Rosa Parks? Is it because the council member is religious? Or patriotic? Or white? Or female? We are all Americans. We should all especially look to those noteworthy Americans for inspiration who have sacrificed and made great contributions to our country, particularly when a thought or idea in such political climates may go against the current conventional 2 wisdom. Julie Geary and her ilk demonstrate their ignorance by suggesting that there is no connection whatsoever between Rosa Parks’ stand for civil rights and the desire of millions and millions of fellow citizens to do away with restrictive mask edicts and social gathering bans as dictated by our California governor. The simple truth is that the US Supreme Court had ruled five times against our California governor because his diktats were indeed violating the civil rights of those Californians seeking to exercise their naturally ordained First Amendment freedoms. The Court has ruled time and time again that the governor cannot shut down churches and other social and political gatherings because he has no authority to do so. Similarly, Rosa Parks sought justice when she was denied her seat on a bus in the Democratically controlled Jim Crow South of last century. The Jim Crow policies that existed then were little more than government imposed diktats that were ruled as unconstitutional. If anything, Gavin Newsom’s anti-civil rights actions this past year should entitle him to join the ranks of fellow unconstitutional political demagogues like Woodrow Wilson, Orval Faunus and Bull Connor ... all Democrats. So instead of letting these race-baiters and political grievance hustlers continue to try to spread dissension, angst and recriminations throughout Temecula, let’s remember that we should honor, celebrate, invoke and seek inspiration from all American leaders and heroes of virtue, of conscience and of bravery. These fellow Americans come from all walks of life and from all natural origins of class, race and creed. Much like the banners honoring Veterans that are periodically displayed throughout Temecula, these honorees transcend race, class, gender and creed. I would highly recommend that local agitator and grievance-monger Julie Geary make an appointment with the REDI Commission so that she can learn some tolerance herself as well as understanding that race-baiting is just as bad as racism. Note: I have Bcc the e-mail contact of the REDI Commission so that they can perhaps expect a call from Ms. Geary in the near future for her remedial counseling. Lastly, I once again strongly encourage this esteemed city council to fully re-open City Hall and City Council meetings to the public as quickly as possible. City Council meetings should be done in person, in council chambers, with the public attending in person and interacting with the Council. Public comments should revert back to live in person comments only so that people cannot hide behind computers and/or anonymous internet names. This would also relieve our capable and dedicated City Clerk from reading these e-mailed and frequently anonymous, redundant and noxious comments into the record. Let the public read their own comments in person into the record. 3 Thank you for your time and attention. John Andrews 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:41 PM To:Melissa Bahou Subject:RE: City Council open letter Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Melissa Bahou < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:28 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council open letter Hello Council Members, I am not very excited to be writing to you yet again, but after seeing our town make news headlines I can’t remain silent. I am so tired of Temecula only making the news when one of our representatives blindly acts with ignorance. Seriously, it’s exhausting and pathetic. I’m sure you will get plenty of eloquently written letters, mine? I’ll keep it short because, well honestly, I’m tired of this mess. It seems as though Jessica Alexander needs both a reality check and a history lesson after seeing her be wrong about both public health and Rosa Parks. She was right about one thing, we are a year into a pandemic, A YEAR, and yet people still want to deny the validity of masks and distancing to protect our community. At this point, there’s no reason to respect that opinion nor take anything else those holding that thought seriously. Frankly, it’s a joke and one that’s not very funny. I’m over it. Jessica is not a martyr, and using her status as a council member to try and compare herself to Ms. Rosa Parks while completely getting the story wrong is such an embarrassment. It shows how badly Ms. Alexander needs to agree to diversity training, and maybe a GED American History course. We are better than this, at least I want to believe so. Temecula is better than this. Encourage your fellow council members to be better than this, please. Your exhausted community member, 2 Melissa Bahou 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:41 PM To:Paul Bahou Subject:RE: Council meeting open letter Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Paul Bahou < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 2:58 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Council meeting open letter Dear council members, Jessica Alexander is being unfairly maligned. She understands that true freedom cannot exist when public safety is a concern. Though I’m curious why she is only advocating against masks? Why stop there? In the spirit of council member Alexander’s stunning and brave stance on masks, I propose we also do away with stop signs and stop lights. Why should my freedom to drive when it pleases me be infringed? Saying I need to wait my turn is clearly liberal state overreach. Speed limits need to be banned as well. I think Rosa parks would have wanted us to blast through residential neighborhoods. Nothing says freedom like white knuckling it through a school zone with the gas pedal to the floor. Also, I only feel comfortable when I have a running chainsaw with me. Some people have a therapy dog, well I have a therapy chainsaw, yet apparently I can’t take my running therapy chainsaw into target. I didn’t know this was Soviet Russia. I thought this was America. The shame! I don’t know about you, but true freedom means having zero responsibility towards your neighbors and colleagues. Isn’t that the America we all want? Isn’t that the America our founders envisioned? One free of inconvenience and consequence and the need to understand basic historical concepts? As the great Patrick Henry said: “Give me liberty… and if that causes your death, too bad, it’s my right to cough maskless in public places during a pandemic.” 2 Thank you for your time Paul Bahou 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:38 PM To:Carter Family Subject:RE: Stop the REDI Commission and stop the Masks Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Carter Family < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:19 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Stop the REDI Commission and stop the Masks Hello, It has come to my attention that Temecula City Council, where I reside, is not valuing our Christ Centered and Conservative values and is targeting those who have such values. Please see below for items in which I would like you to address: Stop the required training of the REDI commission Do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission Immediately eliminate of Mask Wearing in Temecula, if people want to wear a mask great. There is no science or evidence that Mask stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she culturally insensitive. She has the Christ Centered and Conservative Values we voted for. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright 2 statements that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Stop this behavior and messaging, discourage it! Embrace Jessica and the citizens that elected her to the office of Temecula City Council. She and we strive to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of citizens and people within our community. We are people of love and care for all citizens of our beautiful Temecula. Sincerely, Keri and David Carter Temecula, CA 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:55 PM To:Tim McDonald Subject:RE: To be read into the record at tonight's council meeting. Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Tim McDonald < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:44 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: To be read into the record at tonight's council meeting. Good Evening Members of the Temecula City Council, I, Tim McDonald, have been a part of this city for over 30 years. I was born here, grew up here, went to school here, worked here for most of my adult life, and bought a house here. There are only a handful of people here today that have as deep of roots in this city as I do. I understand and recognize there are at least a couple of members on this council that can make these claims as well. As a long-term resident, I like to celebrate our achievements as I am sure you do. I feel them very deeply as the city played such a big role in who I am today. I was so pleased to hear that the city was one of the first in the area to pass a unanimous resolutio n to condemn racism as well as create one of the first diversity committees in the state. At the time, I thought to myself “finally! Temecula is taking a step in the right direction”, because what I have witnessed over the course of the 30+ years I have resided in Temecula are some glaring issues regarding race, equity, and inclusion. As an elementary student at one of our cities oldest schools, I saw students repeatedly called racial slurs or be made fun of because of the color of their skin. In high schoo l, I saw students carve swastikas into desks and threaten the lives of my black classmates. As an adult, I worked for prominent business owners in this city that actively would not hire employees based on their race or ethnicity. I have friends that have moved out of town and are wary to come to Temecula for a night of dinner and drinks because of the traumatic experiences they have been through here in the past and they are afraid of reliving those nightmares. I constantly see my friends and colleagues being treated unfairly or not given the same opportunities as others because of the color of their skin IN THIS VERY CITY. What is even sadder is 2 that I rarely see people in power such as teachers, managers, or community leaders stand up when they see something wrong. On June 6th it was a breath of fresh air to see so many members of our city leadership attend a workshop on race, equity, and inclusion. Your willingness to be venerable and admit that there is always more to learn will not go unnoticed. What was noticed though was the absence of one member of this council from the workshop, Councilwoman Jessica Alexander. It does not seem to be a coincidence either a week after missing the meeting on race, equity, and diversity she makes national news for racially insensitive comments. Though Councilwoumen Alexader's actions are not as direct or transparent as the ones I mentioned earlier it seems as though a clear pattern is beginning to form. Mayor Edwards, you have recently mentioned and provided commentary on the MLK Jr quote, “the ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty of the bad people but the silence over that by the good people”. It is time for you all to truly do the right thing and stand up and unify against Jessica’s actions and words. Your silence on the matter is truly an embarrassment to our city, and until you stand up and do something it will likely continue to plague our town. You have participated in the workshops and have spoken of how this behavior should not be tolerated. Now's the time to stand up and do something. Once again, I am not some outsider trying to “fan the flames” I am someone that has lived here as long as any member on this council who wants you all to stand up and take action against someone who is showing a pattern of racial insensitivity. The negative media will not disappear until the city acts against its deep-rooted problem. This city has the potential to be a bigger, better, more diverse, and inclusive city than ever. I encourage you to listen to your informed constituents and work alongside the REDI commission to make your city a great place to live for all. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:57 PM To:Reynisha Day-Ballinger Subject:RE: Comment to be read into the record at the city council meeting tonight Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Reynisha Day-Ballinger < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 3:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Comment to be read into the record at the city council meeting tonight Dear Temecula City Councilmembers, My name is Reynisha Day. I lived, worked, and went to school in the Temecula Valley. I am also a member of Temecula Unity. First of all, I would like to commend the four members of the City Council that attended the diversity training on April 6. Your actions let me, and other residents of color, know that you are committed to knowing better to do better. You have my thanks. Once again, I am saddened to see Temecula on the news for utter nonsense. As I said during the Unity in the Community event held last summer, Temecula has a reputation to people of color and it is not a positive one. I was appalled and angered to hear Councilwoman Jessica Alexander’s incendiary remarks during April 13th’s meeting. Perhaps she skipped on the day they covered The Civil Rights Movement in school (not unlike how she skipped the diversity training she clearly needs) but I would like to set a few things straight: 1. As an elected official who prides herself on serving her constituents, Councilwoman Alexander certainly used the word “I” a lot. “I can not” “I will not”... The focus should be more on the nearly 5,000 Riverside 2 County residents who lost their battles to Covid and the prevention of any more deaths, not throwing a temper tantrum about having to wear a mask? 2. No one likes wearing masks. You know what doesn’t care about anyone’s feelings about that? Covid- 19. 3. Rosa Parks never moved from the back of the bus to the front. She refused to give up her seat at the back of the bus to a white man. If you are going to co-opt a Civil Rights leader’s defining moment in history to make a painfully terrible metaphor, at least do the research and get the story correct first. 4. Speaking of poorly planned uses of figurative language, as an English teacher, I would also like to point out that a nationwide mandate to wear masks for the health of your fellow countrymen is in no way, shape, or form comparable to the dehumanization, subjugation, and oppression of an entire racial group. Full stop. I am calling on Councilwoman Alexander to apologize to the members of the community whom she hurt with her racially insensitive remarks and commit to going to diversity training. If she is unwilling to do these things to make amends, then it is clear she has no place in public office and needs to resign. I hope she will take the positive road and decide to grow and be better. Sincerely, Reynisha Day 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:41 PM To:LEE FOLLANSBEE Subject:RE: NO MORE STAFF RAISES!!!! Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: LEE FOLLANSBEE < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:01 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: NO MORE STAFF RAISES!!!! Cease raising income levels of the city staff! Many of them make ridiculous amounts of money as it is! The City Manager is way overpaid! Lee Follansbee 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:43 PM To:James Laverty Subject:RE: Letter to Council Member Jessica Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: James Laverty < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:06 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; ; erica.ramirez@temeculaca.gov; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov> Subject: Fwd: Letter to Council Member Jessica Alexander ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: James Laverty < Date: Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 4:02 PM Subject: Re: Letter to Council Member Jessica Alexander To: Jessica.alexander@temecula.gov <Jessica.alexander@temecula.gov>, erica.ramirez@temecula.gov <erica.ramirez@temecula.gov>, randi.johl@temecula.gov <randi.johl@temecula.gov> On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 3:39 PM James Laverty < wrote: Dear Council Member Alexander: I’m writing this letter regarding recent comments you made during a city council discussion about whether or not the Council ought to continue to meet virtually in light of the COVID pandemic. Your comments were that you, “cannot and will not” wear a mask. This letter is not intended to be a personal attack, but one of constructive criticism. 2 While there are a number of issues to discuss regarding your comments. Such as historical accuracy and appropriate comparisons, I will focus on the rights and responsibilities of citizens in our democracy, the relationship between the two, and how your comments fit in to the conversation. It starts with the premise that for every right there is are corresponding responsibilities. To illustrate my point, we all have a right to drive our cars, but it is not an unfettered right. As you know, we must obtain a license by meeting certain criteria including passing a written test, and registering our vehicle with the DMV. Additionally, we have to obey traffic laws, and drive within speed limits, and maintain our car so that it is safe to drive. So, our right to drive is truly there, but it comes with duties and responsibilities for the safety of oneself and for all; in other words, for the common good. The same is true with wearing a mask under certain conditions during this pandemic. Wearing a mask provides for the safety of the wearer and for others; again, for the common good. Refusing to wear a mask is like saying “I cannot and will not follow traffic regulations.” In my opinion, today in our country, there is a great deal of focus on rights and liberties, and not enough focus on responsibilities and duties that accompany them. Hopefully, this will change. There is something else inherent in the relationship between rights and responsibilities, and that is selfishness and care for others. We all have the privilege of exercising our rights, as long as, in exercising them, we don’t infringe upon the rights of others, such driving one’s car the way one wants to, disregarding the rights and safety of others, or not wearing a mask resulting in hurting others; in other words, the common good. At the start of this letter I stated that this is not a personal attack, and it is not. I truly believe that you are not a selfish person. How could you be, having been a Marine and a police officer? I certainly have a soft spot in my heart for Marines, who helped me out more than once under dire circumstances. Some decisions, however, can give people the wrong impression. I would hope that you not only reconsider your statements, but possibly the way you look at rights,liberties, and responsibilities in our democracy. Respectfully, James J. Laverty 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:38 PM To:Mark Lane Subject:RE: City Council Concerns Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Mark Lane < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:18 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards <Maryann.Edwards@citycouncil.org>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Concerns Dear Temecula City Council members and staff, I am a three year resident of the City of Temecula in the Rancho Highlands Community. I have come to enjoy living in this city and up until Covid, would have recommended it as a conservative place to live and enjoy. Recently however, I have been made aware of a couple of positions adopted by the City Council that are contrary to these conservative values. This includes diversity training required by a commission formed unilaterally by the city council (REDI) that I/we as residents of the city were not part of forming. I would like to know why the commission was formed and for what purpose. That information should have been communicated upfront to all citizens of the City of Temecula in order for us to have the opportunity to discuss the intentions and ramifications of such training. As I understand, this training is mandatory. This is certainly an elimination of certain liberties is it not? I certainly did not elect council members who would deny the liberty of opting out of this training. This includes a mandate to wear a mask in city council meetings. Let this be a choice, not a requirement as there have been ZERO peer reviewed studies that say masks are effective in preventing the spread of Covid. In fact, just recently a Stanford University peer reviewed study claims the opposite. Information such as this is critically important before draconian measures such as mask wearing and social distancing are instituted. Furthermore, to attack one of your fellow council members and accuse them of racial insensitivity because she is taking a stand (as Rosa Parks took a stand) to not wear a mask is absolutely unacceptable. Racially insensitive? Do you realize how absurd that sounds? 2 Would you say the same if she was a person of color? As elected officials I expect that due diligence is performed and that actions like these are agreed upon with the residents of the city before implementation. Finally with respect to due diligence, there is evidence that the BIPOC Community Organization of Temecula has ties to the Black Lives Matter movement/ corporation. I would expect that through your due diligence, you know that the BLM movement is a Marxist organization that aims to defund the police and attack core family values. These are American values that should not be compromised, so I strongly question your support of such a movement. You as City Council members must take a stand AGAINST this type doctrine as it only serves to perpetuate the hate you appear to abhor. As a resident of this city, I do NOT agree with the stance you’ve taken on these issues and strongly urge you to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it, immediately eliminate the edict of ‘Mask Wearing’ in Temecula and let people choose for themselves whether to wear one or not, and finally respect the wishes of conservative council members who have been elected for their values and Christian beliefs without the shaming and name calling we have heard as recently as yesterday in the mainstream media. Thank you for your time and regards, Mark Lane – Rancho Highlands Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:38 PM To:Marcia Blackmun Subject:RE: Raise Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Marcia Blackmun < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:25 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Raise No raise for Aaron Adams Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:37 PM To:Kurt Shafer Subject:RE: PLS JUSTIFY ANY RAISES BEFORE APPROVING THEM Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Kurt Shafer < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:32 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: PLS JUSTIFY ANY RAISES BEFORE APPROVING THEM KURT AND DARLENE SHAFER TEMECULA Sent from Mail for Windows 10 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:37 PM To:COLLEEN KANDUS Subject:RE: Letter regarding council member Alexander Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: COLLEEN KANDUS < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:33 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter regarding council member Alexander I’m a 23 year resident of Temecula, and would like to take this opportunity to address the Temecula City Council on a recent issue about which I feel strongly. Firstly, recent comments by councilmember Jessica Alexander comparing her refusal to wear a mask to Rosa Parks’ brave actions on the bus in Montgomery Alabama that day in 1955, are misguided and insensitive. Pretending to identify with the enormous daily struggle of people of color in this country by Ms. Alexander belies her lack of knowledge of history, of the civil rights movement, the nuances of inclusivity, and clearly shows her lack of qualifications to sit on the city council. Apparently Ms. Alexander chose to skip the diversity training that she most desperately needs. Secondly, refusing to wear a mask in situations where the CDC recommends to do so, shows a cavalier attitude toward the health and safety of her fellow citizens. Her vocal refusal sets a poor example for others in a time in which we all are suffering from the repercussions of a global pandemic. City council members should represent all citizens of Temecula, have a working understanding and sensitivity to equity, and set a good example for public health. I call for Ms. Alexander to receive the diversity and equity training (Racial Equity Diversity & Inclusivity training), so that she will better understand and serve all the citizens of Temecula. Best Regards, Colleen Kandus Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:52 PM To:Denise Taylor Subject:RE: supporting public servant Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Denise Taylor < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:49 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: supporting public servant Stop the required training of the REDI commission Do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission Immediately eliminate the mandate of mask wearing in Temecula, if people desire to wear a mask that is their purgative. There is no science or evidence that Mask will stop the transmission of disease. They are harmful. Keep all business open without restriction capacity requirements I am asking that you respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is culturally insensitive. She is Christ Centered and has conservative values and that is why we voted for her. We love our community and all people. The inference and outright statements that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful and not true. Please stop this behavior and untruth! I am asking that Jessica be embraced and the citizens that elected her to the office of Temecula City Council. We will strive to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of citizens and people within our community. We are a people who deeply care for all citizens. 2 I am requesting that you hold the interest of the majority of the citizens in Temecula. I am supported by a majority of like minded Temecula citizens, demanding not to form the REDI Commission. In November we elected Jessica Alexander and re-elected Stew Stewart to the office of Temecula City Council to represent our values and city government. These hate speeches and untruths that are being leveled against Jessica Alexander must stop immediately. This is our city, collectively. I ask and respectively demand, again supported by the majority of like minded Temecula Citizens, to immediately stop the required training of the REDI commission, do away with the expense of the REDI commission & eliminate it. The Citizens of Temecula do not want this and did not vote for the REDI Commission. Immediately eliminate the mandate of ‘mask wearing’ in Temecula, if people want to wear they are at liberty to do so. There is no science or evidence that mask wearing will stop the transmission of disease. They can be harmful. Keep all business open with no restricted capacity requirements. Respect Jessica Alexander as our elected official and discourage the rhetoric that she is ‘culturally insensitive’. She is Christ Centered and has our godly views that are conservative values we voted for. We love our community and all the people who live here. These untruths that we are not inclusive and that we are racist is hurtful, harmful and are not true. I ask that you stop this rhetoric and discourage it! Please embrace Jessica and the citizens that elected her to the office of Teme cula City Council. We try to engage and make better the struggles, trials and tribulations of all citizens and people within our community. We are people of love and care for all of the citizens of Temecula Valley. We care for and love all people. We need to be a “model community” for others communities. Thank you for your understanding and for your time of service. Good day and God bless. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:04 PM To:albia miller Subject:FW: Attachments:Jessica bLACK April 27, 2021.doc Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: albia miller < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 4:58 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE HOUSING SUCCESSOR TO THE FORMER TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (AND, WITH RESPECT TO A LOAN OF CITY FEES, ALSO IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE CITY) APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE LOAN AGREEMENT WITH LAS HACIENDAS HOUSING ASSOCIATES, L.P. FOR THE “LAS HACIENDAS” 77 UNIT LOW INCOME AFFORDABLE MULTI-FAMILY (APARTMENT) PROJECT AT 28715 LAS HACIENDAS STREET AND 28772 CALLE CORTEZ I would be much more worried about Jessica’ Black’s voting for development on small projects like Las Haciendas 77 apartments and overcrowding Temecula than her disconnection of unrelated agendas and Valued Historical Actions such as Rosa Park’s moving Equity Forward. She hasn’t come into this Over Crowded, over developed, water draining, crime increasing, polluted, traffic generating sprawling bedroom town and done anything to pull projects off the plans, reform the general Plan that is allowing 40 more apartment complexes and secure a Moratorium against any more building. Some people think there is a housing crisis which is a developer invented phrase. There is no housing crisis. There is too many people desiring to live in Southern California and it is affecting the weather from paving over the Nature and concentraring fumes from fossil fueled vehicles. There is way too much covering over of valued open spaces that house the endangered animals, absorb floods, sequester heat and CO2 People here seem to spend much too much time traveling somewhere else and disturbing the philosophy of “live where you work.” Many people wish to weigh in on a remark that needs explanation more than if they wake up to Premature Earth Rumbling because more heavy buildings will be moved onto converging Earth Quake Faults in Riverside County. We need your time spent on saving Temecula from the unkept promises and inability to retain Natural Open Spaces because developers can’t create open land. If you want to redeem yourself, Ms Black, then, get in this Council and shut down the attack of multi Unit Housing on Temecula or any Housing or malls or gas stations or any more of any thing. People will find housing from the homes they left back East in States they haven’t lived in yet. If we continue over heating the West Coast we will continue to have blizzards and tornadoes and hurricanes on the warming gulf of Mexico, Pacific, and Atlanta. And instead of complaining about masks and her Comfort Zone, she should Honoring the Heroes of Those who are helping the American Consciousness to Mature in Equity. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:23 PM To:Skylar Tempel Subject:RE: Public Comment for 4/27/21 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Skylar Tempel < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:15 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment for 4/27/21 Hi Randi! Sorry this is coming in late, thanks so much for reading this tonight! Good evening council and staff, I feel that many other residents have already made excellent comments about Councilmember Alexander’s comments and actions so my comments will be limited on her Rosa Parks comment. Simply put, equating your public health concern to a monumental civil rights action is unconscionable. Councilmember Alexander’s words were not being used as an inspiration, rather a false equivalency in an attempt to appear justified in her cause. I will no longer be kind on the subject of Councilmember Alexander. After receiving nearly $50,000 of support from the Riverside Sheriffs union and sending mailers that darkened the skin of her african american opponent, it’s clear to me that Councilmember Alexander has no interest in diversity and equity education. It’s also clear to me that Councilmember Alexander has no business continuing to serve on the Temecula City Council. Councilmember Alexander does not put in the work, nor the time needed to effectively serve her residents. Councilmember Alexander may also be in violation of the brown act and other open government laws. Councilmember Alexander has yet to file her Form 700, a form that allows the public to be aware of 2 any potential conflicts of interest relating to finances or real property. Every other council member has filed this form, and continues to file annually. To the rest of council; I recommend a full censure of your colleague for her behavior and inaction to represent her constituents. Councilmember Alexander has proven by not disclosing her financial interests that any vote she takes may be a vote to enrich herself. This is a danger to all of Temecula. My last comment is for everyone watching this meeting. Thank you to everyone standing up to denounce and call out Councilmember Alexander. To everyone still defending her, why? Why do you choose to defend someone in this only for themselves? Why do you defend someone who when given the opportunity has used her position to inject hatred and fear into our community? Temecula forgives when you are remorseful and set themselves on paths to improve. Temecula will never forget perpetrators that abuse the power we the people granted to them. My family has lived in Temecula for over 27 years and I’ve never had to call for the resignation of a councilmember until now. Councilmember Alexander is a disgrace to our community. Resign. Your time is up. All my best, Skylar Tempel 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:00 PM To: Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander should be removed from office Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:56 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: FW: Jessica Alexander should be removed from office [Verified City Account] -----Original Message----- From: Terri Wells < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:42 PM To: Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander should be removed from office Dear Mr. Adams, Jessica Alexander has sullied the reputation of our beautiful Temecula Valley by comparing herself to Rosa Parks. We need to show that Temecula Valley does not tolerate her whiny, ignorant behavior. Please vote to remove Ms. Alexander from office. Terri Wells Murrieta Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:00 PM To:Terri Wells Subject:RE: Jessica Alexander is an embarrassment to the Temecula Valley and to the nation Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message----- From: Terri Wells < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 5:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Jessica Alexander is an embarrassment to the Temecula Valley and to the nation Dear Council Members; It is imperative that Jessica Alexander be removed from the Temecula City Council. She is, in common parlance, a “Karen” and demonstrated this by whining about wearing a mask and comparing herself to the great Rosa Parks. Ms. Alexander—your comparison is simply delusional. This privileged white woman is no Rosa Parks. She is an embarrassment to the entire Temecula Valley and to the nation. Her comments were so egregious that they made national news. Council Members: I implore you to step up to the plate and publicly denounce Jessica Alexander and remove her from office. Demonstrate to the citizens of Temecula Valley and to the nation that our beautiful wine country will not tolerate bigots. Terri Wells Sent from my iPhone 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:40 PM To:victor mcdowell Subject:RE: Letter to City Council for tonight's meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: victor mcdowell < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 6:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Letter to City Council for tonight's meeting Hello Temecula City Council, I'm a 62 year old retired police detective that grew up in South LA. My dad (the grandson of a slave), and my uncles joined the military during WW2 to help defend the world against the Nazi threat. My dad and uncles were forced to serve, and wait on white soilders, and were not allow to participate in combat duty. Jessica Alexander, has absolutely no idea of the struggles of the Civil rights movement. Her attempt to equate that struggle, to mask wearing is ridiculous, and extremely insensitive. I believe Councilwoman Alexander should take an open minded approach to the diversity training, and the commission. How does her refusal to do either benefit the people of Temecula Valley? Vic McDowell 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Monday, April 26, 2021 3:10 PM To:JessicaM@speakupnow.org Subject:FW: Written public comment for City Council meeting on April 27 - Agenda item 23 Attachments:VFCRiv_PublicComment_CDBG_CityofTemecula_20210427FINAL.pdf Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next City Council meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jessica Muñoz, Esq., MFS <JessicaM@speakupnow.org> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2021 2:22 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Written public comment for City Council meeting on April 27 - Agenda item 23 Good afternoon, Please find attached to this email written public comment for tomorrow’s city council meeting, agenda item 23: the public hearing for CDBG funding. Thank you, Jessica Jessica Muñoz, Esq., MFS Pronouns: She/Her Executive Director, Riverside County jessicam@speakupnow.org Direct: 951-357-9100 Main: 951-472-9301 speakupnow.org City of Temecula – City Council Meeting – April 27, 2021 Agenda item 23 : CDBG Public Hearing Public Comment Submitted by: Jessica Muñoz, Executive Director, Voices for Children’s Riverside County Program Voices for Children – Recommendation for $6,816 (to provide a CASA for 4 children) Voices for Children is very grateful for the investment of CDBG funds we have received in the past. These funds have enabled us to provide advocacy for Temecula children in foster care. This fiscal year we have served 420 children across the county to date, seven of whom are from Temecula. These funds will make it possible for us to continue to grow our program and serve more children from the City of Temecula. Children in foster care have been removed from their homes and families because they have been abused or neglected. Taken into the Court’s protective custody, they live in foster homes, group homes, or other temporary situations, sometimes moving homes—and schools—several times a year. Meanwhile, the Court makes all decisions about each child’s life. This is where Voices for Children has a unique role in improving children’s lives. Voices for Children is the only agency in Riverside County designated by the Superior Court to recruit, train, and supervise volunteer advocates called Court Appointed Special Advocates, or CASAs. In other words, if a child in Temecula has an opportunity to be assigned a CASA, that CASA will come from Voices for Children. April 26, 2021 Page 2 Our volunteer CASAs get to know the children they serve on a one-on-one basis, as advocates and mentors. Our CASAs form and nurture strong relationships with their assigned child, and our CASAs are often the only consistent adult that these children have in their lives. CASAs are able to share what they learn about their child with the child’s social worker, judges, and other dedicated professionals who are striving to make the best decisions possible for these children. On behalf of Voices for Children, we hope you will approve the recommendation that the City of Temecula once again partner with Voices for Children through the to support the most vulnerable children in this community. 1 From:Randi Johl Sent:Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:22 PM To:Dorcas Shaktman Subject:RE: Assistance League of Temecula Valley Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next Council meeting. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Dorcas Shaktman < Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2021 1:19 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Assistance League of Temecula Valley Public Comments for tonight's City Council meeting: Agenda item: 23. Approve Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Annual Action Plan From: Dorcas Shaktman, Assistance League of Temecula Valley Thank you to the City of Temecula for all of the support that you have provided to Assistance League of Temecula for many years. You have supported us in making a difference and strengthening our community, and for that, we are grateful. Tonight, I would like to provide an update on Operation School Bell, our main philanthropic program which was significantly impacted over the past year by the COVID-19 pandemic. Due to the restrictions of the pandemic, it was necessary to create an alternative plan to continue to service the needs of our students living in poverty and to satisfy the requirements of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). 2 For Temecula residents Assistance League partnered with Community Mission of Hope Food Pantry to meet these needs. Families completed forms providing student size and preference information. These forms were provided to Assistance League members who then shopped at Target stores for $125 in clothing for each qualified student. The bags of clothing were delivered to the food pantry for distribution to the student. Although this process was labor intensive, it accomplished our goal of meeting the CDBG grant requirements and of serving the needs of the community. With the expectation that students will be in school in the 2021-2022 school year, families will use the Operation School Bell online registration system to enroll in the program and will once again have the experience of shopping in the retail stores for their new clothes and shoes. 100% of CDBG grant funds are used to buy clothing for Operation School Bell students. Thank you again for your ongoing commitment to supporting Operation School Bell. Dorcas Shaktman