Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
072721 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 27, 2021- 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Rabbi Yonasan Abrams of Chabad of Temecula FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS - NONE BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Public/Traffic Safety Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in person public comments. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. Page 1 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions 2. 3. 4. 5. Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report Approve Action Minutes of July 13, 2021 and July 20, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of July 13, 2021 and July 20, 2021. Attachments: 07/13/2021 Action Minutes 07/20/2021 Action Minutes Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: Attachments: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands Approve City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2021. Attachments: Agenda Report Treasurer's Report Adopt a Resolution to Establish the Amount of Voter -Approved Measure C Annual Special Tax Levv for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. Page 2 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 6. 7. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Adopt a Resolution to Approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution CR&R Rate Adjustment Cover Letter Exhibit D - Schedule of Rates Riverside County Disposal Fees Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, Project PW 11-10, Located at Friendship Park (formerly Pala Community Park J Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Adopt the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, Project PW11-10; and 2. Direct staff to file the Notice of Determination (NOD); and 3. Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW 11-10; and 4. Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids. Page 3 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 8. 9. Attachments: Agenda Report Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration Notice of Determination Project Description Approve Second Amendment to Agreement with David Evans and Associates. Inc. for the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW17-25 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with David Evans and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, for additional contingency in support of the professional design and environmental services of the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW 17-25 and increase the City Manager's authority to approve extra work authorizations by the same amount. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment Project Description Award a Construction Contract to American Asphalt South. Inc. for the Citvwide Slurry Seal Program - Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to American Asphalt South, Inc. in the amount of $1,546,980.04 for the Citywide Slurry Seal Program - Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $154,698, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; and 3. Make a finding that the Citywide Slurry Seal Program - Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. Attachments: Agenda Report Contract Project Location Maps Slurry Seal Street List RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 4 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: Zak Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in person public comments. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 10. Approve Action Minutes of July 13, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of July 13, 2021. Attachments: Action Minutes 11. Annrove Agreement with Douglas Hiner Umnirina Service for Slow Pitch Officiating Services Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the three-year agreement with Douglas Hiner Umpiring Services for slow pitch officiating services in an amount not to exceed $31,000 annually. Attachments: Agenda Report Agreement CSD PUBLIC HEARING 12. Approve Temecula Community Services District Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2021-22 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD Page 5 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B - RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C - PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, SERVICE LEVEL D - RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND SERVICE LEVEL R - EMERGENCY UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A Engineer's Report CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, August 10, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 6 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart TPFA PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to three minutes. For all Public Hearing or Business items on the agenda, each speaker is limited to five minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting by the City Clerk. Email comments must be submitted to randi.johl@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Email comments shall be subject to the same rules as would otherwise govern in person public comments. TPFA CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the Temecula Public Financing Authority request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 13. Authorize Fiscal Year 2021-22 Special Tax Levies for the Community Facilities Districts Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-02 (HARVESTON) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-06 (HARVESTON II) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA Page 7 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-01 (CROWNE HILL) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03 (WOLF CREEK) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01 (MUNICIPAL SERVICES) Page 8 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 Attachments: Agenda Report CFD 01-02 Resolution - Harveston CFD 01-02A Budget Report CFD 01-02B Budget Report CFD 03-06 Resolution - Harveston II CFD 03-06 Budget Report CFD 03-01 Resolution - Crowne Hill CFD 03-01 Budget Report CFD 03-03 Resolution - Wolf Creek CFD 03-03 Budget Report CFD 03-02 Resolution - Roripaugh Ranch CFD 03-02 Budget Report CFD 16-01 Resolution - Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 CFD 16-01 Resolution - Exhibit A CFD 16-01A Budget Report - Facilities CFD 16-01B Budget Report - Services CFD 19-01 Resolution - Municipal Services CFD 19-01 Resolution - Exhibit A CFD 19-01 Budget Report TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS TPFA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will be held on Tuesday, August 10, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 9 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 14. Adopt Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for Fiscal Years 2019-20 and 2020-21 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019-20 AND 2020-21 Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Exhibit A Notice of Public Hearing DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 15. Community Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Planning Activity Report 16. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Monthly Report 17. Police Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Statistics 18. Public Works Department Monthly Report Page 10 City Council Agenda July 27, 2021 Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, August 10, 2021, at 5:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 11 Item No. 1 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 2 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 13, 2021 - 7:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 7:01 PM: Mayor Maryann Edwards INVOCATION: Sylvester Scott of Temecula Baha'i Community FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS - NONE BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission, Planning Commission, and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE) PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on non-agendized item(s): • Steve Martin The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on agendized item(s): • Suzanne Lane (Items 4, 19 and 20) Karen Brooks (Item 20) • Sonia Perez (Item 4) Dario Bianchi (Item 20) • Jason Lund (Item 4) Bob Kowell (Item 20) • Rick Van DerLinden (Item 19) Joyce Bianchi (Item 20) • Mark Lane (Item 19 and 20) Joy Wilson (Item 20) • Jessica Christopher (Item 20 Greta Pontacelli (Item 20) • John Andrews (Item 20) Denise Grandi (Item 20) • Michael Jordan (Item 20) Rob Quaid (Item 20) • Dave Barret (Item 20) Slim Killens (Item 20) • Rick Reiss (Item 20) The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on agendized item(s): • Christine T. Massa (Item 6) • Matt C (Item 4) • Denise Grandi (Item 4) • Good Citizen (Item 4 and 20) • Karen Maria Villa (Item 6) • Cindy Kennedy (Item 20) • Julie Geary (Item 6) • Jorri Caldwell (Item 20) • Albia Miller (Item 14) 0 Robert Lamb (Item 20) CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. 2. Approve Action Minutes of June 22, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of June 22, 2021. 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-39 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4. Approve Purchase of the Flock Automated License Plate Recognition System Recommendation: That the City Council approve the purchase of the Flock Automated License Plate Recognition System ("Flock System") and related services agreement. 5. Receive and File the General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report for the Period of January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020 Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the General Plan and Housing Element Annual Progress Report for the period of January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020. 6. Authorize Preparation and Execution of a Professional Services Agreement with Cit ayg to to Complete a Needs Assessment and Evaluate Potential Sites (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Pro Tempore Rahn and Council Member Stewart) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Authorize the City Manager to execute a $42,451 Professional Services Agreement with Citygate Associates to estimate the size of a police headquarters and patrol station based upon the June 9, 2021 proposal, and approve extra work authorizations up to $4,300, approximately 10% of the agreement amount; and 2. Appropriate $47,000 from undesignated General Fund balance to the consultant services account within the City Manager Department. 7. Approve Sponsorship Agreement with Athlete Recovery Fund for the USA Pump Track Championships (At the Request of Subcommittee Members Mayor Edwards and Council Member Stewart) Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Sponsorship Agreement with Athlete Recovery Fund for in -kind City support valued at $7,000 and $11,415 for promotional services for the USA Pump Track Championships. 8. Approve Agreement with Musson Theatrical, Inc., for Replacement of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater Lighting System Equipment Recommendation: That the City Council approve an agreement with Musson Theatrical, Inc. in the amount of $135,474.98, for the replacement of the Old Town Temecula Community Theater's automated theatrical lighting fixtures. 9. Approve Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project, Phase IIA - Recycled Water Agreement Recommendation: That the City Council approve the Recycled Water Agreement between the City of Temecula, Rancho California Water District, and Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project, Phase IIA and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 10. Approve Agreements for Consultant Services with Dudek, FALCON Engineering Services, Inc., NV5, Inc., and Wallace & Associates Consulting, Inc. for On -Call Construction Management Services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the agreements for consultant services with Dudek, FALCON Engineering Services, Inc., NV5, Inc., and Wallace & Associates Consulting, Inc., in the amount of $1,000,000 each, for on -call construction management services for Fiscal Years 2021-22 and 2022-23. 11. Approve Amendments to Annual Agreements for Fiscal Year 2021-22 for Routine Maintenance, On -Call and Emergency Services for Various Operational Needs of the Maintenance Division, Department of Public Works Recommendation: That the City Council approve the following amendments to the annual agreements for Fiscal Year 2021-22, for routine maintenance, on -call and emergency services for services including weed abatement, painting, excavation and grading, homeless encampment cleanup, and general repairs and maintenance of various facilities as needed: Rene's Commercial Management, Fourth Amendment - $200,000 US National Corp., Third Amendment - $200,000 Miko Mountain Lion, Inc., Fourth Amendment - $300,000 Singh Group, Inc., First Amendment - $100,000 12. Approve First Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement for Landscape and Restroom Maintenance Services with MCE Corporation Recommendation: That the City Council approve the First Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement for landscape and restroom maintenance services with MCE Corporation, in the amount of $129,575.16 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. 13. Approve First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with EXP U.S. Services, Inc. for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail Phase II - Margarita Under -Crossing, PW 19-04 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the First Amendment to the Agreement for Consultant Services with EXP U.S. Services Inc. for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Trail Phase II - Margarita Under -crossing, PW 19-04, increasing the contingency amount by $65,450; and 2. Increase the City Manager's authority to approve extra work authorizations by $65,450. 14. Approve Tract Map 37341-7 and 37341-10 (Located on East Side of Butterfield Stage Road Between Calle Chapos and Murrieta Hot Springs) Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve Tract Map 37341-7 and 37341-10 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; and 2. Approve the Subdivision Improvement and Monumentation Agreements with the Developer; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. RECESS: At 7:51 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting. At 7:53 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL RITSINF IRS 18. Approve Amended Schedule of Authorized Positions and Salary Schedule Effective July 13, 2021 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021-40 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REVISING THE SCHEDULE OF AUTHORIZED POSITIONS AND SALARY SCHEDULE Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Alexander. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 19. Receive and File 2021 Community pinion Survey Report Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the 2021 Community Opinion Survey Report. Receive and file only, no action. 20. Receive Status Update on the Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Initiative, Approve Proposal with NV5 for Media Relations Training, and Provide General Direction Regarding the Creation of a City Council Protocol Manual and/or Other Initiative Items (At the Request of May Edwards and Mayor Pro Tern Rahn) Recommendation: That the City Council receive a status update on the Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (REDI) Initiative, approve the proposal with NV5 for media relations training, and provide general direction regarding the creation of a City Council Protocol Manual and/or other initiative items. Receive and file. City Council provided general direction to proceed with NV5 for media relations training and the compilation of a City Council protocol manual. 21. Receive Presentation on Upcoming Local Redistricting Efforts and Provide General Recommendations Regarding Public Engagement Recommendation: That the City Council receive a presentation on upcoming local redistricting efforts and provide general recommendations regarding public engagement. Receive and file, no action. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 12:18 AM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 27, 2021, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 20, 2021 - 9:00 AM CALL TO ORDER at 9:10 AM: Mayor Maryann Edwards FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Maryann Edwards ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PUBLIC COMMENTS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council on the agendized item: • Bob Kowell Mark Lane • Greta Pontarelli The following individual(s) submitted an electronic comment on agendized item: • Rick Reiss • Christine T. Massa • Bob and Laura Quaid • Jeff Pack • Brian and Christine O'Neill • Laura LaMont • Lori Hulsey • Patricia Ramirez • CB Homes • Suzanne Lane • Julie Geary • Christopher Bout • Karen Brann RITSINESS 1. Conduct Workshop on the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP)Update Workshop with discussion and general direction only; no action taken. ADJOURNMENT At 12:31 PM, the City Council Special meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 27, 2021, at 5:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve List of Demands PREPARED BY: Jada Shafe, Senior Accounting Technician RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $11,743,543.88. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of July, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/01/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 462,780.50 07/08/2021 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 10,625,509.12 07/08/2021 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 655,254.26 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 7/27/2021 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 11,743,543.88 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 5,974,355.02 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 14,397.54 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 7,808.72 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 2,988.02 170 MEASURE A FUND 50.00 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 251,564.21 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B STREET LIGHTS 23,105.39 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 4,270,203.11 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 1,768.37 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 7,556.70 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 212,062.71 300 INSURANCE FUND 45,821.39 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 9,930.39 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 56,093.01 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 3,314.74 340 FACILITIES 70,345.87 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 26.19 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 26.22 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 73.17 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 26.22 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 74.83 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 48.93 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 28.67 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 42.74 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 62.93 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 14.58 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 56.52 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 217.73 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 29.00 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 4,298.59 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 13.92 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 14.46 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 14.09 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 3,161.49 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 95.58 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 42.65 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 764.21 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 298.32 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 14.21 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 137.52 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 1,049.71 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 18,394.68 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 438.03 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 14.37 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 14.48 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 240.39 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 17.09 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 78.39 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 14.74 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 712.34 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 75.11 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 106,292.33 $ 11,088,289.62 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 317,647.80 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 475.35 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 3,600.93 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 206,952.17 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 1,438.40 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 638.94 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 3,331.55 300 INSURANCE FUND 2,243.84 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 1,960.51 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 36,225.94 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 4,562.35 340 FACILITIES 7,924.21 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 28.05 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 28.05 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 84.30 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 28.05 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 84.20 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 56.16 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 0.05 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 0.52 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 0.52 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 0.52 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 0.52 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 0.52 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 0.05 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 321.89 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 0.05 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 0.52 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 0.05 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 160.87 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 15.99 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 0.05 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 0.05 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 15.99 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 0.05 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 96.50 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 135.14 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 321.95 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 611.69 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 0.05 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 1.54 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 257.45 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 32.10 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 0.05 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 0.52 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 643.79 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 0.22 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 65,324.25 TOTAL BY FUND: 655,254.26 $ 11,743,543.88 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 O6/29/2021 1:10:03PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 500688 7/1/2021 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS, STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: HEALTH AND SAFETY SVCS AQUATICS 500689 7/1/2021 000475 B N I PUBLICATIONS INC PUBLICATIONS: MAINT DIV: PW 500690 7/1/2021 003272 DAISYECO INC printer and plotter supplies:GIS/Civic 500691 7/1/2021 020648 DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 REPAIR OF CAMERA EQUIPMENT: INC, CONVERGINT INFO TECH TECHNOLOGIES 500692 7/1/2021 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPORARY FENCING: FRIENDSHIP SRVCS PARK TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC TEMPORARY FENCING: FRIENDSHIP PA 500693 7/1/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARKS: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: BLDG INSPE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CODE ENFOI 500694 7/1/2021 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT MAY'21 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: INC WRKRS COM 500695 7/1/2021 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC IRRIGATION REPAIRS: VARIOUS SLOPES 500696 7/1/2021 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, DECALS: BC: FIRE DEPT CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS DECALS: BC: FIRE 500697 7/1/2021 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: BLDG & SAFETY INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CODE ENFORCEN 500698 7/1/2021 022056 IDETAIL SUPPLY CO ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 84 500699 7/1/2021 020673 INTEGRITY SUPPORT Pre -Employment Screenings - HR SERVICES INC, EMPLOYMENT SCREENING RESO Amount Paid Check Total 708.00 708.00 502.00 502.00 1,308.63 1,308.63 5,555.20 5,555.20 314.26 95.00 74.64 483.90 1,221.28 693.74 465.91 257.84 256.85 157.02 148.54 86.74 39.89 3,327.81 1,250.00 1,250.00 368.60 368.60 208.75 21.49 230.24 52.87 49.97 16.17 119.01 54.38 54.38 409.53 409.53 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 O6/29/2021 1:10:03PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 500700 7/1/2021 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC GEOTECH SVCS: 28500 OLD TOWN FRONT ST 500701 7/1/2021 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC EMERGENCY MEDICAL SUPP - MEDIC 500702 7/1/2021 004141 MAINTEX INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR 500703 7/1/2021 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC MAY CDBG-CV EMERGENCY RENTAL ASSIST PGM MAY CDBG PRGM ADMIN: COM DEV MAY CDBG-CV EMERGENCY RENTAL AS MAY CDBG-CV EMERGENCY RENTAL AS MAY LABOR COMPLIANCE MONITOR SV 500704 7/1/2021 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC MAY JANITORIAL SVCS: MPSC 500705 7/1/2021 018314 MICHAEL BAKER MAY ENG & SURVEY INTERNATIONAL SVCS-SIDEWALKS: 17-28 DSGN SVCS: TEMECULA PKWY PW18-11 500706 7/1/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 INC 500707 7/1/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 500708 7/1/2021 013482 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES 5/26-6/23 AFTER HRS SEC: PMP INC, DBA BAS SECURITY TRAC/LIBRAR 6/24-30 AFTER HRS SECURITY: PUMP TF 500709 7/1/2021 009452 STRAWN, WILLIAM REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THEATER REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THE 500710 7/1/2021 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC DJ/MC/SOUND SET-UP: SMR CONCERT 6/17 DJ/MC/SOUND SET-UP: SMR CONCERT E DJ/MC/SOUND SET-UP: RECOGN 6/15 500711 7/1/2021 009194 VILLAGE NEWS, INC PUBLICATION: COMM SUPPPORT: CLASS OF'21 500712 7/1/2021 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE CO MAY'21 MSHCP PAYMENT REG, CONSERVATION AUTHORITY Amount Paid Check Total 3,850.00 681.21 2,955.85 5,054.88 4,156.63 2,003.50 113.00 66.75 15,531.94 1,676.50 896.05 169.36 2,000.00 5,278.40 1,106.00 817.87 86.97 3,350.00 3,350.00 700.00 250.00 9,384.00 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 3,850.00 681.21 2,955.85 11,394.76 15,531.94 2,572.55 169.36 2,000.00 6,384.40 904.84 7,400.00 250.00 9,384.00 77.796.21 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 O6/29/2021 1:10:03PM CITY OF TEMECULA 25 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 77 796.21 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 11109 5/11/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING LW MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: JONES, 470.00 ASSOCIATION E. 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING LW MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: 365.00 ASSOCIATION RABIDOU, B. 021273 GREEN BUSINESS LW MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: TOMA, 85.00 CERTIFICATION, INC SARA 020370 BEENVERIFIED.COM LW DIGITAL SBSCPTN: CODE 52.45 ENFORCEMENT 021060 LOS ANGELES TIMES, DBA LW EMAIL NEWPAPER SUBSCRIPTION 0.22 LATIMES.COM 020536 WALL STREET JOURNAL LW ONLINE MBRSHP SUBSCRIPTION: 159.16 1,131.83 WATSON 11297 6/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 021003 CVS PHARMACY AA RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTGS 14.12 008669 VONS AA RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTGS 85.47 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 AA RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL MTGS 84.52 184.11 11300 6/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 019360 BUSHFIRE KITCHEN AA RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED 322.32 SESS 020535 LUNA GRILL RO RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED 246.20 SESS 4/27 021453 SACRAMENTO BEE RO SUBSCRIPTION: ONLINE DIGITAL 12.99 581.51 SUBSCRIP 11305 6/9/2021 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 002354 POSITIVE PROMOTIONS INC IG BRANDED ITEMS: HR STAFF 1,408.94 022562 COUNT IT LABS INC IG USER FEE: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 19.95 022562 COUNT IT LABS INC IG USER FEE: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 19.95 022562 COUNT IT LABS INC IG USER FEE: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 199.50 022516 CALIF EMERGENCY SERVICES IG CONF REGIST: ALFORD, M. 195.00 ASSOC 011816 D'ALESIO INC IG FIRE HELMET SHIELD: EMERGENCY 72.09 MGR 022562 COUNT IT LABS INC IG USER FEE: EMPLOYEE WELLNESS 59.85 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES IG CHARING CABLES FOR 56.62 INC ELECTRONICS: HR 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES IG STEP COUNTERS: EMPLOYEE 166.35 2,198.25 INC WELLNESS 11367 6/25/2021 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER MAY WATER SVCS 3000387 RANCHO 24,598.91 24,598.91 DISTRICT VISTA RD Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11370 6/23/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11371 6/23/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11372 6/23/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 11373 6/23/2021 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY 11374 6/23/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11375 6/23/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11376 6/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11377 6/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11378 6/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11379 6/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11380 6/24/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC 11381 6/25/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11382 6/25/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11383 6/28/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11385 6/29/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11386 6/29/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11387 6/29/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total JUNE INTERNET SVCS 30600 PAUBA 609.14 609.14 RD JUNE INTERNET SVCS - CHILDREN'S 130.98 130.98 MUSEUM MAY 055-475-6169-5 32380 DEER 48.72 48.72 HOLLOW WY MAY 015-575-0195-2 STA 92 32211 105.73 105.73 WOLF MAY 700246548782 26953 YNEZ RD 108.32 108.32 MAY 700475634086 26036 YNEZ RD 401.46 401.46 MAY INTERNET SVCS - CITY HALL 5,658.04 5,658.04 MAY INTERNET SVCS - CITY HALL 2,957.30 2,957.30 MAY INTERNET SVCS - SENIOR 150.98 150.98 CENTER MAY INTERNET SVCS - COMMUNITY 120.98 120.98 CENTER JUNE INTERNET SVCS - EXTERNAL 100.98 100.98 DMV JUNE INTERNET SVCS 42569 598.64 598.64 MARGARITA RD JUNE INTERNET SVCS 30875 RANCHO 598.64 598.64 VISTA RD JUNE INTERNET SVCS 32380 DEER 598.64 HOLLOW WAY JUNE INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST 49.77 648.41 MAY 700252118808 29721 RYECREST 15.27 15.27 JUN 700066386743 32805 PAUBA RD 81.31 81.31 JUN 700606072010 46679 PRIMROSE 346.64 346.64 AVE Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 11388 6/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JUNE INTERNET SVCS 41845 6TH ST 11389 6/29/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JUNE INTERNET SVCS 28922 PUJOL ST 11390 6/29/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC JUNE INTERNET SVCS - SKATE PARK AND 11391 6/29/2021 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC JUNE INTERNET SERVICES - CITY HALL 206113 6/29/2021 021516 SOMERSET LP, DBA HOMELESS STONEWOOD APT HOMES PREV/DEPOSIT:ROBERSON-REED 206114 7/1/2021 004594 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC UNIFORM - MEDIC/CHIEF: FIRE DEPT 206115 7/1/2021 013387 ADAME LANDSCAPE INC, DBA JUN SWEEPING SRVCS: PRKG SWEEPING UNLIMITED STRUCTURE 206116 7/1/2021 003951 ALL AMERICAN ASPHALT ASPHALT SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 206117 7/1/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PREVENTION: FIR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY COUNCIL OF MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY COUNCIL MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HR MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CITY COUNCIL OF 206118 7/1/2021 004422 AMERICAN BATTERY BATTERIES: CIVIC CTR CORPORATION, DBA AMERICAN BATTERY SUP BATTERIES: CIVIC CTR 206119 7/1/2021 007065 B&H PHOTO & ELECTRONICS AV SOUND/VIDEO PRODUCTION CORP EQUIP: PEG 206120 7/1/2021 015765 BEISTLE COMPANY THE, DBA PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE FIRE SMART PROMOTIONS 206121 7/1/2021 005716 BIRTH CHOICE OF TEMECULA FY 20/21 DISCRETIONARY GRANT INC FUNDS: JS FY 20/21 DISCRETIONARY GRANT FUND 206122 7/1/2021 005665 BLACKS TOWING TOWING SRVCS: POLICE Amount Paid Check Total 598.64 598.64 598.64 598.64 186.76 186.76 295.98 295.98 1,183.00 1,183.00 1,302.14 1,302.14 540.00 540.00 296.79 296.79 3,620.23 1,444.51 480.50 239.87 186.25 180.16 89.78 32.60 -129.03 6,144.87 678.60 77.23 755.83 14,397.54 14,397.54 2,680.71 2,680.71 2,000.00 500.00 2,500.00 260.00 260.00 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 206123 7/1/2021 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW KEYBOARD & MOUSE REPLACEMENT: GOVERNMENT LLC IT DISPLAYS FOR QLESS: COM DEV 206124 7/1/2021 004931 CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT: PW CIP 206125 7/1/2021 020025 CIVIL SOURCE INC MAY ENG SVCS: BUTTERFIELD STG, PW15-11 206126 7/1/2021 016530 COMMUNITY MISSION OF FY 20/21 DISCRETIONARY GRANT HOPE FUNDS:ME 206127 7/1/2021 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING DIST GARAGE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: LIBRARY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: JRC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: JRC 206128 7/1/2021 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 206129 7/1/2021 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA491 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC RFRSHMNTS/SUPPLIES: FOOD SVC PR( SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 206130 7/1/2021 012600 DAVID EVANS AND MAY CONST BID SUPPOT: SANTA ASSOCIATES INC GERTRUDIS CR 206131 7/1/2021 004222 DIAMONDBACK FIRE & FIRE EQUIPMENT: FIRE STA84 RESCUE, INC 206132 7/1/2021 022525 DOMINGUEZ, SARAH REFUND: HARVESTON COMMUNITY PARK PICNIC 206133 7/1/2021 019681 EJK CORPORATION, DBA BEST PET WASTE BAGS: VARIOUS BAG COMPANY LOCATIONS 206134 7/1/2021 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXP MAIL SVCS: FIRE DEPT 206135 7/1/2021 017866 GARDEN STATE FIREWORKS 2021 Fireworks Display: Special Events INC 206136 7/1/2021 003792 GRAINGER COVID SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 206137 7/1/2021 022574 HARSHMAN, JERRICK REFUND: VIOLATION DISMISSAL #350481 Amount Paid Check Total 536.03 282.63 818.66 750.00 750.00 2,175.00 2,175.00 500.00 500.00 2,934.84 999.96 767.01 53.29 4,755.10 2,806.65 2,806.65 375.52 157.33 67.51 600.36 2,470.00 2,470.00 717.28 717.28 120.00 120.00 685.13 685.13 45.48 45.48 9,975.00 9,975.00 3,211.70 3,211.70 70.00 70.00 Page:4 apChkLst 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206138 7/1/2021 018352 JAMES ELLIOTT TRIBUTE TO JOHNNY CASH 1,000.00 1,000.00 ENTERTAINMENT 6/17/21-THTR 206139 7/1/2021 021870 JOEL S. BITTO, DBAA-ONE FUEL COVER: FIRE STA92 16,100.00 PATIOS PATIO COVER: FIRE STA 73 8,680.00 24,780.00 206140 7/1/2021 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC POOL EQUIPMENT: AQUATICS 434.89 434.89 206141 7/1/2021 013982 M C I COMM SERVICE JUN XXX-0714 GEN USAGE PD MALL 37.68 ALARM JUN XXX-0346 GEN USAGE 37.59 75.27 206142 7/1/2021 005690 MICHELLE'S PLACE WOMENS FY 20/21 DISCRETIONARY GRANT 500.00 500.00 BREAST, CANCER RESOURCE FUNDS: MR CENTER 206143 7/1/2021 000209 NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS INC, EQPMNT REPAIR: PW STREET MAINT 16.36 16.36 DBA CROP PRODUCTION SRVCS 206144 7/1/2021 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW CIP 54.47 DIV OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW CIP 29.35 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW CIP 9.77 93.59 206145 7/1/2021 018830 PLANGEA INC STAFF UNIFORMS: CRC 1,674.70 1,674.70 206146 7/1/2021 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE BANNER: ECON DEV 45.00 45.00 ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME SIGNSGRAPHICS 206147 7/1/2021 010652 QUALITY CODE PUBLISHING MUNICIPAL CODE SRVCS: CITY CLERK 1,563.75 1,563.75 206148 7/1/2021 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER MAY WATER SVCS 31000576 RANCHO 55.03 55.03 DISTRICT VISTA RD 206149 7/1/2021 021603 RENTALS BY PREMIER INC, CANOPY/TABLE/CHAIR RENTALS: 6/15 2,426.16 PREMIER PARTY & TENT RENT EVENT TABLE & CHAIRS RENTAL: 6/24 EVENT 599.50 3,025.66 206150 7/1/2021 017391 RISE INTERPRETING INC SIGN LANGUAGE INTERPRETER: 275.00 275.00 TCSD 206151 7/1/2021 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND, NOE PAVE REHAB, PW21-01 50.00 50.00 RECORDER (LR21-0853) 206152 7/1/2021 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, PLAN CHECK & INSPECTION: RRSP 1,466.00 1,466.00 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH N/S, 17-06 DEPT Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206153 7/1/2021 017446 ROSE AGAIN FOUNDATION 206154 7/1/2021 022575 ROSSI, ELIZABETH 206155 7/1/2021 000277 SANDS WORLDWIDE INC 206156 7/1/2021 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 206157 7/1/2021 011511 SCUBA CENTER TEMECULA 206158 7/1/2021 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 206159 7/1/2021 019250 ST FRANCIS ELECTRIC LLC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total FY 20/21 DISCRETIONARY GRANT 750.00 750.00 FUNDS: ME REFUND: MISS CATHY'S TINY TOTS 66.00 66.00 ART/CRAFT SUPPLIES: SUMMER DAY 1,109.55 1,109.55 CAMP PHOTOGRAPHY: NAGGAR/MARL 300.00 PARK 6/15 PHOTOGRAPHY: FRIENDSHIP PRK MOS, 150.00 450.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 840.00 840.00 JUN EMERG PEST CONTROL: 473.00 HARVESTON PARK MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: RYCRESTi 188.00 MAY EMERG PEST CONTROL: PW STREI 160.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: CIVIC CEN 120.00 MAY EMERG PEST CONTROL: DUCK POI 94.00 JUN EMERG PEST CONTROL: RVSP 94.00 JUN EMERG PEST CONTROL: RVSP 94.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: THEATER 90.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: LIBRARY 90.00 MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: JRC 74.00 MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: PBSP 70.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: MRC 70.00 MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: TVE2 56.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: WOLF CRE 49.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: STA OTC 48.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: T. MUSEUN 42.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: STA 92 42.00 MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: WEST WIN 40.00 MAY PEST CONTROL SRVCS: C. MUSEU 36.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: WED CHPI. 32.00 1,962.00 REWIRE TRAFFIC LOOPS: 6,475.00 6,475.00 YN EZ/SOLANA Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206160 7/1/2021 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT 206161 7/1/2021 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CLEANING 206162 7/1/2021 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS AND MIRROR, COMPANY INC 206163 7/1/2021 003599 TY LIN INTERNATIONAL 206164 7/1/2021 003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY 206165 7/1/2021 019291 TLK ICE, INC., DBA:KONA ICE TEMECULA VAL 206166 7/1/2021 022102 UNITED PARCEL SERVICES INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 1,507.42 MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES: CRC 542.41 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 467.32 MISC SKATE PARK SUPPLIES: CRC 389.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 221.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 148.77 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 103.98 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES 103.63 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 79.87 OFFICE SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES 77.11 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW CIP 72.28 OFFICE SUPPLIES: PW CIP 56.77 MISC SKATE PARK SUPPLIES: CRC 51.06 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 42.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 41.30 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 39.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 39.03 MISC SKATE PARK SUPPLIES: CRC 31.64 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 25.57 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 25.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 25.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES: LIBRARY 13.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 3.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES: TCSD 2.91 CREDIT: OFFICE SUPPLIES/POLICE OTS -41.86 4,068.42 CARPET CLEANING SRVCS: STA 73 1,225.00 CARPET CLEANING SRVCS: STA 84 815.00 CARPET CLEANING SRVCS: STA 95 585.00 CARPET CLEANING SRVCS: MRC 575.00 CARPET CLEANING SRVCS: STA 92 480.00 3,680.00 MISC GLASS WORK: HARVESTON 499.05 LAKE 3/17 MISC GLASS WORK: HARVESTON LAKE 122.35 621.40 5/1-31 CONSULT: FV PKWY/1-15 PH 177,927.62 177,927.62 11,16-01 SERVICE AWARDS: HR 266.93 SERVICE AWARDS: HR 64.89 331.82 REFRESHMENTS: SMR DAY CAMP 2,410.00 2,410.00 EXPRESS MAIL SRVCS: PW TRAFFIC 10.64 10.64 Page:? apChkLst 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 206167 7/1/2021 022532 UPTOWN JAZZ ORCHESTRA DEPOSIT: THEATER PERFORMANCE 10,000.00 10,000.00 10/3/21 206168 7/1/2021 014850 VALLEY PRINTING SERVICES, PRGM PRINTING: PARK DEDICATION: 151.16 151.16 INC. NAGGAR 206169 7/1/2021 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: CITY FACS 4,831.44 CLEANING SUPPLIES: CITY FACS 2,865.85 CLEANING SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN 2,233.73 CLEANING SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 1,339.91 CLEANING SUPPLIES: CITY FACS 897.19 CLEANING SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 897.19 CLEANING SUPPLIES: VAR PARKS 689.20 CLEANING SUPPLIES: CRC 307.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES: CITY FACS 83.91 CREDIT: CLEANING SUPPLIES/CRC -871.71 13,273.92 206170 7/1/2021 022529 WERLE, TIMOTHY J, DBA CHALLENGE COINS - DC 500.00 500.00 CAMPAIGN FIRE COINS 206171 7/1/2021 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC 5/16-31 TREE MAINT: CROWNE HILL 13,629.00 SLOPE 5/1-15 TREE MAINT: PARKS & MEDIANS 6,232.70 5/16-31 TREE MAINT: CAMPOS VERDE 948.45 5/16-31 TREE MAINT: CIVIC CENTER 497.90 6/1-15 TREE MAINT: VINTAGE HILLS 492.30 6/1-15 TREE MAINT: WOLF CREEK SLOPI 355.55 5/16-31 TREE MAINT: PARKS & MEDIANS 328.20 22,484.10 Grand total for UNION BANK: 384,984.29 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/01/2021 12:56:51PM CITY OF TEMECULA 85 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 384,984.29 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/06/2021 2:03:20PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 500713 7/8/2021 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE AFN DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: POLICE 500714 7/8/2021 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS, STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: HEALTH AND SAFETY SVCS AQUATICS STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: AQUATICS STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: AQUATICS 500715 7/8/2021 021670 ANLIND OF TEMECULA INC, VEH REPAIRAND MAINT: TEM TEMECULA HARLEY-DAVIDSON SHERIFF VEH REPAIR AND MAINT: TEM SHERIFF VEH REPAIR AND MAINT: TEM SHERIFF VEH REPAIR AND MAINT: TEM SHERIFF 500716 7/8/2021 021376 BORUNDA, BRIANNA REIMB: PIO WORSHOP: 6/14 - 6/15 500717 7/8/2021 021349 CASA CENTER AGAINST SART EXAMS: TEM SHERIFF SEXUAL, ASSAULT OF SW RIV CO 500718 7/8/2021 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HVAC INC PLUMBING REPAIR: 6TH STREET RESTROOM PLUMBING SVCS: VAR PARK LOCATION; PLUMBING SVCS: VAR PARK LOCATION; 500719 7/8/2021 020436 CRONBERG, RICHARD N TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 500720 7/8/2021 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL ADA RESTROOM: MORAGA RD SRVCS 500721 7/8/2021 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE DEPT FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE DEP' 500722 7/8/2021 021412 EIDE BAILLY LLP FINANCIAL STATEMENT AUDIT: PLANNING FIEL 500723 7/8/2021 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC JUN LDSCP MAINT: 115/79S INTRCHG MAINT JUN LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS: PV 500724 7/8/2021 014865 FREIZE UHLER KIMBERLY DBA, PROMO ITEMS: VARI STATIONS: FIRE CLEAR BLUE PROMOTIONS PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE PROMO ITEMS: MEDIC: FIRE POLOS - PREV/CHIEFS/MEDIC: FIRE PROMO ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE Amount Paid Check Total 1,726.98 292.25 195.00 2,466.00 375.00 210.28 481.19 337.20 149.00 110.79 1,400.00 374.51 472.00 210.00 112.00 325.76 165.99 28.91 2,500.00 8,550.00 21,133.27 239.89 674.01 660.96 924.22 239.78 1,153.13 621.50 508.23 2,019.23 3,036.00 1,177.67 110.79 1,400.00 1,056.51 112.00 325.76 194.90 2,500.00 29,683.27 5,021.72 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/06/2021 2:03:20PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 500725 7/8/2021 013076 GAUDETYVONNE M, DBA YES TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS YOU CAN DRAW 500726 7/8/2021 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: VARI STATIONS: INC FIRE 500727 7/8/2021 004890 GOLDEN STATE FIRE FIRE SPRINKLER: FIRE STA 92 PROTECTION 500728 7/8/2021 022056 IDETAIL SUPPLY CO ENGINE MAINT SUPPLIES: FIRE STATION 92 500729 7/8/2021 018314 MICHAEL BAKER AUG-JUN CIVIL ENG & DSGN SVCS: INTERNATIONAL PW 18-04 500730 7/8/2021 012264 MIRANDA, JULIO C TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 500731 7/8/2021 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRIC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 INC ELECTRIC SUPPLIES: FIRE STA 95 500732 7/8/2021 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 500733 7/8/2021 020946 MUSSON THEATRICAL INC MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD 500734 7/8/2021 009337 NV5 INC MAY PROJ MGT SVCS: MRC, PW17-21 500735 7/8/2021 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR 5/24 MEDICAL SCREENING: COVID-19 OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 5/12-18 MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 500736 7/8/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: INFO INC TECH CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PW PARKS 500737 7/8/2021 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: FIRE INC PREV 500738 7/8/2021 012904 PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN JUN PLAN REVIEW SVCS: FIRE PREV AND, CONSULTING Amount Paid Check Total 399.00 399.00 369.16 369.16 880.00 880.00 113.92 113.92 574.20 574.20 1,276.80 1,276.80 247.32 506.53 753.85 1,785.00 1,785.00 20,974.51 17,620.62 38,595.13 3,960.00 3,960.00 50.00 699.00 749.00 41.77 396.44 438.21 63.18 63.18 15,668.90 15,668.90 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/06/2021 2:03:20PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 500739 7/8/2021 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 500740 7/8/2021 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 500741 7/8/2021 000645 SMART AND FINAL INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total LOCKSMITH SRVCS: PALA PARK 6/10 97.39 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER 47.85 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: T. MUSEUM 27.29 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: CIVIC CENTER 44.92 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: HELP CENTER 20.93 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: PW LAND DEV VEH 128.99 LOCKSMITH SRVCS: OLD TOWN THEATE 279.63 647.00 SIGN POSTING SRVCS PA21-0048: 213.75 PLNG SIGN POSTING-1219,1321,1414-16: PLNC 427.50 SIGNAGE: FRIENDSHIP PARK BUDDY BE 102.62 743.87 SUPPLIES FOR EE LUNCHEON 6/24 136.33 SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES 97.68 REFRESHMENTS: SMR FOOD SRVC PR( 799.01 1,033.02 Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 114,688.09 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/06/2021 2:03:20PM CITY OF TEMECULA 29 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 114,688.09 Page:4 apChkLst 07/08/2021 1:49:37PM Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 500742 7/8/2021 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Description Amount Paid EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 40.00 PAYMENT Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: Page: 1 Check Total 40.00 40.00 Page-1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11392 6/23/2021 001035 C RAND R INC 11394 6/30/2021 011657 CALIF STATE OF PUBLIC EMPLOYEE, RETIREMENT SYS (CALPERS) 11395 6/30/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11396 6/30/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11397 6/30/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11399 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11400 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11401 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11402 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11403 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11404 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11405 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11406 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11407 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11408 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11409 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11410 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11411 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11412 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11413 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11414 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11415 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11416 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11418 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11419 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11420 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11421 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11422 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11423 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Description Amount Paid Check Total JAN - JUN '21 TRASH HAULING SVCS 4,269,691.44 4,269,691.44 TO FUND GASB 45 CERTB 94,709.33 94,709.33 JUN 700187069897 44173 15.68 15.68 BUTTERFIELD STG JUN 700376130476 29429 TEMECULA 62.65 62.65 PKWY MAY 600000000717 30065 CORTE 1,294.10 1,294.10 CANTERRA JUN 700025366655 41955 4TH ST 13.00 13.00 JUN 700451136031 41702 MAIN ST 14.64 14.64 JUN 700404123666 41638 14.74 14.74 WINCHESTER RD JUN 700230666549 28079 DIAZ RD 15.04 15.04 JUN 700230816695 28077 DIAZ RD 15.24 15.24 JUN 700034047650 44270 MEADOWS 15.46 15.46 PKWY JUN 700369097471 27407 DIAZ RD 15.73 15.73 JUN 700390915502 27991 DIAZ RD 15.72 15.72 JUN 700034500823 32932 LEENA WAY 16.25 16.25 JUN 700035621070 42335 MEADOWS 16.42 16.42 PKWY JUN 700035691903 43487 17.71 17.71 BUTTERFIELD STG JUN 700079543781 30153 TEMECULA 17.87 17.87 PKWY JUN 700170354373 28402 MERCEDES 24.17 24.17 ST JUN 700295838526 44747 REDHAWK 30.12 30.12 PKWY JUN 700171448958 33451 S HWY 79 32.14 32.14 JUN 700541167387 30027 FRONT ST 32.39 32.39 JUN 700374361541 29429 TEMECULA 48.06 48.06 PKWY JUN 700021560619 28300 MERCEDES 59.65 59.65 ST JUN 700278695390 32329 OVERLAND 127.82 127.82 TRL JUN 700169846034 41902 MAIN ST 132.68 132.68 JUN 700338442744 43210 BUS PARK 593.85 593.85 DR JUN 700618295727 41952 6TH ST 787.33 787.33 JUN 700395923227 28314 MERCEDES 1,099.41 1,099.41 ST JUN 700169903325 41904 MAIN ST 1,601.06 1,601.06 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 11424 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11425 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11426 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11427 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11428 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11429 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11430 7/6/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 11431 7/8/2021 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT 11432 7/8/2021 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 11433 7/8/2021 021301 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN 106474 11434 7/8/2021 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN 303355 11435 7/8/2021 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 11436 7/8/2021 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 11437 7/8/2021 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 11438 7/8/2021 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 11439 7/8/2021 000389 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SOLUTION 11440 7/8/2021 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PREMIUM 11443 7/6/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11444 7/6/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11445 7/6/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 11446 7/6/2021 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE 102088 7/6/2021 022579 IMPACT FIRE PROTECTION CORP 111393 6/17/2021 020062 MEDLINE INDUSTRIES INC 206172 7/8/2021 022514 2 HOT ACTIVEWEAR & UNIFORMS 206173 7/8/2021 020724 79 FIELD HOCKEY INC 206174 7/8/2021 001517 AETNA BEHAVIORAL HEALTH LLC, DBAAETNA RESOURCES (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total JUN 700024603688 41845 6TH ST 1,863.65 1,863.65 JUN 700168560580 28690 MERCEDES 2,105.27 2,105.27 ST JUN 700316536912 STA 95 32131 S 2,256.82 2,256.82 LOOP RD JUN 700619156906 OTA 32364 3,055.89 3,055.89 OVERLAND TRL JUN 700350108713 43230 BUS PARK 3,169.94 3,169.94 DR JUN 700000050665 43200 BUS PARK 3,691.28 3,691.28 DR JUN 700474429468 41000 MAIN ST 29,290.85 29,290.85 SUPPORT PAYMENT 899.07 899.07 CHILD CARE REIMBURSEMENT FSA 19,692.94 19,692.94 PAYMENT ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 1,134.62 1,134.62 PAYMENT ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 16,793.98 16,793.98 PAYMENT STATE TAX PAYMENT 31,856.64 31,856.64 FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 101,606.41 101,606.41 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT 13,515.57 13,515.57 NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT 344.39 344.39 PAYMENT OBRA- PROJECT RETIREMENT 7,294.14 7,294.14 PAYMENT PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 146,798.25 PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.00 146,798.25 JUNE INTERNET SVCS 32364 119.99 119.99 OVERLAND TRL JUNE INTERNET SVCS 40820 598.64 598.64 WINCHESTER RD JUNE INTERNET SVCS 28300 598.64 598.64 MERCEDES ST JUNE INTERNET SVCS 29119 1,676.29 1,676.29 MARGARITA RD REFUND: PLAN CHECK FEES PERMIT 1,050.00 1,050.00 F21-2649 QE MAR 2021 SALES TAX PHS 275,726.00 275,726.00 MISC ITEMS: PREVENTION: FIRE 900.45 900.45 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,593.90 1,593.90 JUL EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PRGM: 1,381.60 1,381.60 HR Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206175 7/8/2021 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC 206176 7/8/2021 021057 AMERICAN PATRIOT MUSIC PROJECT 206177 7/8/2021 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC 206178 7/8/2021 017797 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO INSURANCE BROKERS OF CA 206179 7/8/2021 017149 B G P RECREATION INC 206180 7/8/2021 006254 BALLET FOLKLORICO, AKA LORENA HANCOCK 206181 7/8/2021 021502 BUCHER, BRET PHILLIP 206182 7/8/2021 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE, ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS 206183 7/8/2021 001267 CALIF DEPT OF MOTOR VEHICLES 206184 7/8/2021 004604 CALPELRA 206185 7/8/2021 004462 CDW LLC, DBACDW GOVERNMENT LLC 206186 7/8/2021 005417 CINTAS PROTECTION NO 2, CINTAS FIRE 636525 206187 7/8/2021 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 206188 7/8/2021 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL DIST 206189 7/8/2021 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 206190 7/8/2021 001233 DANS FEED AND SEED INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC SUPPLIES: WORKFORCE PRGMS 108.27 MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD 43.65 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 2,268.29 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 642.48 MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CHIEF/BC: FIRE 379.40 SUPPLIES: SKATE PARK: TCSD 329.91 MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD 163.95 SUPPLIES: SKATE PARK: TCSD 552.49 4,488.44 FY20/21 COMMUNITY SRVC FUNDING 5,000.00 5,000.00 POOL TEST REAGENTS: AQUATICS 993.78 993.78 21-22 BROKERAGE FEE 51,000.00 51,000.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,494.80 2,494.80 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 426.30 426.30 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 1,057.00 1,057.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: ROMINE, M. 19.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: ROMINE, M. 38.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: ROMINE, M. 25.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 37.50 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 38.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 25.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 38.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 38.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 25.00 WEBINAR REGISTRATION: LEWING, S. 32.00 315.50 REGIST: 4LU7983 FIRE TRAILER TCC 10.00 10.00 #5 CONF REGIST: 11/16-11/19 OBMANN, B. 1,090.00 1,090.00 EMPLOYEE COMPUTER LOAN: 1,846.28 BUTLER, G. KEYBOARD & MOUSE REPLACEMENT: 11 60.68 1,906.96 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 32.52 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 274.00 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 40.26 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 106.89 FIRST AID KIT MAINT: RISK MGMT 187.22 640.89 APR FSA & COBRAADMIN: HR 574.20 MAY FSA& COBRAADMIN: HR 592.70 1,166.90 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKS 1,797.07 1,797.07 MISC SUPPLIES: BC: FIRE 484.80 484.80 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 28.58 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 52.00 80.58 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206191 7/8/2021 002990 DAVID TURCH AND ASSOCIATES 206192 7/8/2021 022506 DESIGN PATH STUDIO 206193 7/8/2021 009618 ENNIS FLINT INC 206194 7/8/2021 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE 206195 7/8/2021 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 206196 7/8/2021 021365 GEORGE HILLS COMPANY INC 206197 7/8/2021 021814 GIROUARD ERICK JOSEPH, DBA E&G DISTRIBUTION LLC 206198 7/8/2021 003792 GRAINGER 206200 7/8/2021 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 206201 7/8/2021 020698 HICKS AND HARTWICK INC 206202 7/8/2021 003198 HOME DEPOT 206203 7/8/2021 022540 ICON HEALTH AND FITNESS INC 206204 7/8/2021 022569 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS INC 206205 7/8/2021 009734 IN-N-OUT BURGERS 206206 7/8/2021 022018 KNOWBE4INC 206207 7/8/2021 004230 LINCOLN EQUIPMENT INC 206208 7/8/2021 005090 LOS RANCHITOS HOME, OWNERS ASSOC. 206209 7/8/2021 022490 MALWAREBYTES INC (Continued) Description APR FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY MGR MAY FEDERAL LOBBYING SVCS: CITY M Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW VISION PLAN PAYMENT SUPPORT PAYMENT JUN CLAIMS RECOVERY SRVCS: RISK MGMT NEWSPAPER SUBSCRIPTION: MPSC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS MAINT: PW MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES: VARI STATION! MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: AQUATICS MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: M FACILITIES MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TVM MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: IWTCM EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES: SPORTS/RANGE MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: TCC MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES: CODE ENF MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN MISC SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN THEATER EQUIPMENT/SUPPLIES: SPORTS MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: MPSC ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: HEIRLOOM MISC HRDWR SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW MISC SUPPLIES TVM /ACE: TVM MISC SUPPLIES: SUMMER DAY CAMP: C SUPPLIES: AQUATICS GYM EQUIPMENT: FIRE STA95 VEHICLE MAINT: STREETS: PW RFSHMENTS: EOQ JUN 2021 STAFF TRAINING: INFO TECH POOL EQUIPMENT: AQUATICS POOL EQUIPMENT: AQUATICS POOL EQUIPMENT: AQUATICS PROPERTY DUES: APN 922-140-010 ANTIVIRUS OFFSITE COMPUTERS INFO TECH Amount Paid Check Total 5,500.00 5,500.00 8,000.00 1,522.81 1,671.67 100.00 1,690.56 68.75 2,359.96 9,312.16 8,759.93 676.80 2,152.50 3,352.92 8.08 2,015.01 212.86 41.82 678.16 187.76 158.96 2,514.06 212.71 465.69 75.71 810.00 1,833.09 380.40 2,488.53 165.00 3,460.41 3,036.61 2,098.09 483.75 1,081.40 494.47 1,089.23 25.00 1.586.50 11,000.00 8,000.00 1,522.81 1,671.67 100.00 1,690.56 68.75 2,359.96 30,825.13 810.00 4,867.02 3,460.41 3,036.61 2,098.09 483.75 2,665.10 25.00 1,586.50 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206211 7/8/2021 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 206212 7/8/2021 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS DIV 206213 7/8/2021 018830 PLANGEA INC 206214 7/8/2021 010338 POOLAND ELECTRICAL, PRODUCTS INC 206215 7/8/2021 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 206216 7/8/2021 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COMPANY INC 206217 7/8/2021 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC 206218 7/8/2021 014379 PROFESSIONAL IMAGE ADVERTISING, DBA EXTREME SIGNSGRAPHICS 206219 7/8/2021 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPLY 206220 7/8/2021 021107 PUBLIC ADVERTISING AGENCY INC 206221 7/8/2021 022552 RAND J RESTAURANTS LLC, DBA BLAZE PIZZA 206222 7/8/2021 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PKASSOC 206223 7/8/2021 011853 RAN CON COMMERCE CNTR PH2,3&4 206224 7/8/2021 000355 RIVERSIDE CO REGISTRAR OF VOTE 206225 7/8/2021 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEPT 206226 7/8/2021 022495 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF'S-GREYBAR (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total DENTAL HMO PAYMENT 12,495.87 12,495.87 COVID19 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 44.99 COVID19 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 280.12 COVID19 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 77.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 147.88 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 34.32 COVID19 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 20.45 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 18.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES: EOC 18.72 641.83 RASH GUARDS/SUN PROTECTION: 1,254.88 1,254.88 AQUATICS MISC CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH 278.02 PAD MISC CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH PAI 246.94 MISC CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH PAI 207.34 MISC CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH PAI 270.00 MISC CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH PAI 191.29 1,193.59 PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT 222.25 222.25 FY21/22 SUBSCR:PW 180905656 506.84 506.84 PUBLIC SWIM WRISTBANDS: 375.82 375.82 AQUATICS 1/1/21-6/30/21 BANNERS: ECON DEV 3,181.75 3,181.75 MAY UNIFORM SRVCS: PW PARK 158.91 MAINT APR UNIFORM SRVCS: PW PARK MAINT 56.89 MAY UNIFORM SRVCS: PW PARK MAINT 59.31 MAY UNIFORM SRVCS: PW PARK MAINT 61.30 336.41 DSGN SRVCS: TEMECULA MAGAZINE 5,995.00 5,995.00 REFRESHMENTS: SMR DAY CAMP 985.82 985.82 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: DIAZ 2,033.07 RD JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: TVE2 2,234.14 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: FOC 1,843.17 6,110.38 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: STN 510.71 73 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLI` 198.38 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLI` 177.27 JUL-SEPT'21 BUS PKASSN DUE: OVRLI` 249.03 1,135.39 NOV'20 ELECTION SRVCS: CITY 48,923.45 48,923.45 CLERK 5/6-6/2 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,560,961.40 4/8-5/5 LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,598,449.65 5,159,411.05 BUSINESS CARDS: POLICE 16.16 16.16 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 206227 7/8/2021 000277 SANDS WORLDWIDE INC 206228 7/8/2021 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE 206229 7/8/2021 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PRESTON 206230 7/8/2021 022542 SHIPPING CONTAINER DEPOT INC 206231 7/8/2021 013695 SHRED -IT US JV LLC, DBA: SHRED -IT USA LLC 206232 7/8/2021 000537 SO CALIF EDISON 206233 7/8/2021 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC 206234 7/8/2021 012652 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, TELEPHONE COMPANY 206235 7/8/2021 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC 206238 7/8/2021 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 206239 7/8/2021 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE COMPANY 206240 7/8/2021 017814 STC TRAFFIC INC 206241 7/8/2021 022539 STUDIO ART QUILT ASSOCIATES, INC 206242 7/8/2021 009061 STURDIVANT, ANGELA P 206243 7/8/2021 007698 SWANK MOTIONS PICTURES INC 206244 7/8/2021 014337 TEMECULA LITTLE LEAGUE 206245 7/8/2021 022102 UNITED PARCEL SERVICES INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 143.04 143.04 MAY PUBLIC NTCS: CITY CLERK 665.54 665.54 PHOTOGRAPHY: EE LUNCHEON 6/24 150.00 PHOTOGRAPHY: SMR MEALS PRGM 6/21 150.00 300.00 SHIPPING CONTAINERS: TCC/MEDIC 12,462.50 12,462.50 MAY-JUN DOC SHRED SRVCS: CITY 293.48 293.48 FACS JUN 700116137841 VARIOUS 32,507.00 LOCATIONS JUN 700276704365 VARIOUS LOCATION; 486.60 32,993.60 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: VAR 493.00 PARKS JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: PBSP 70.00 JUN PEST CONTROL SRVCS: DUCK PON 49.00 612.00 JULY GEN USAGE: 0141,0839,0978,0979 612.93 612.93 REFRESHMENTS: SMR DAY CAMP 229.02 TRNG 6/8 REFRESHMENTS: SMR DAY CAMP TRNC 264.41 REFRESHMENTS: STAFF RECOGN 6/23 290.24 783.67 BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT 9,088.57 9,088.57 VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE 1,542.56 1,542.56 PAYMENT MAY TRAF SGNL SYS UPGRD:HSIP, 3,192.50 P W 19-09 MAY STIR LGHT PLN REVIEW & INSPECT 212.50 3,405.00 BOOKS FOR GIFT SHOP: TVM 300.00 300.00 TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 2,310.00 2,310.00 MOVIE RENTALS: MOVIES IN THE 636.81 PARK 7/9 MOVIE RENTALS: MOVIES IN THE PARK: 753.19 1,390.00 REFUND: SNACK BAR SECURITY 200.00 200.00 DEPOSIT EXPRESS MAIL SRVCS: CITY CLERK 10.54 10.54 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date 206246 7/8/2021 Vendor 007987 WALMART 206247 7/8/2021 020670 WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE LLC 206248 7/8/2021 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 128.46 MISC SUPPLIES: HUMAN SERVICES 70.70 SUPPLIES: (SFSP): HUMAN SERVICES 287.94 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 432.14 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 325.26 OFFICE SUPPLIES: MRC 275.63 SUPPLIES: SFSP HUMAN SERVICES 164.76 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 499.72 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 913.06 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 760.93 MISC SUPPLIES: SPORTS PRGM 165.71 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 182.99 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 503.57 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 12.77 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 310.41 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 1,306.54 MISC SUPPLIES: CRC 1,065.67 7,406.26 TPFACFD NO. 16-01 PREPAYMENT 4,350.00 4,350.00 5/16-31 TREE MAINT: LIBRARY 355.55 355.55 Grand total for UNION BANK: 10,510,781.03 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/08/2021 1:49:37PM CITY OF TEMECULA 126 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 10,510,821.03 Page9 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2021 PREPARED BY: Rudy J. Graciano, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2021. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of May 31, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2021 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2021 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 39,691,950.74 39,691,950.74 39,691,950.74 25.23 1 1 0.104 0.106 Retention Escrow Account 725,106.18 725,106.18 725,106.18 0.46 1 1 0.062 0.063 Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Trust Accounts 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 10.77 1 1 23.652 23.980 Local Agency Investment Funds 86,933,179.78 87,043,572.14 86,933,179.78 55.27 1 1 0.334 0.339 Federal Agency Callable Securities 8,000,000.00 7,971,360.00 8,000,000.00 5.09 1,666 1,409 0.728 0.738 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 5,000,000.00 5,078,010.00 5,000,000.00 3.18 1,132 471 1.897 1.923 157,296,573.91 157,456,336.27 157,296,573.91 100.00% 122 88 2.857 2.897 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking 23,986,819.68 23,986,819.68 23,986,819.68 1 1 0.000 0.000 (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments 181,283,393.59 181,443,155.95 181,283,393.59 122 88 2.857 2.897 Total Earnings May 31 Month Ending Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 143,665.33 2,775,677.49 Average Daily Balance 165,251,959.95 155,320,357.85 Effective Rate of Return 1.02% 1.95% Reporting period 05/01/2021-05/31/2021 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 NL! CP Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2021 Page 1 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 233358001-6 01-2 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 5,513.08 5,513.08 5,513.08 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 233358006-6 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 503,282.20 503,282.20 503,282.20 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 233358000-6 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 414,576.26 414,576.26 414,576.26 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 276213009-6 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213008-6 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 515.82 515.82 515.82 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 276213006-6 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 741,141.98 741,141.98 741,141.98 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 164741002-6 03-03 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 118,414.86 118,414.86 118,414.86 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 164741008-6 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 194,102.94 194,102.94 194,102.94 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 164741006-6 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.000 0.000 1 164741000-6 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 790,215.30 790,215.30 790,215.30 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 164742002-6 03-06 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 25,001.21 25,001.21 25,001.21 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 164742000-6 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 118,766.53 118,766.53 118,766.53 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 229462007-6 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462002--6 03-1 BOND FD First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 2,587.09 2,587.09 2,587.09 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 229462009-6 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462006-6 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,217.67 17,217.67 17,217.67 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 229462000-6 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 359,983.12 359,983.12 359,983.12 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 94669921-6 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 94669911-6 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669917-6 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-6 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669000-6 03-1 SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213002-6 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.80 0.80 0.80 0.000 0.000 1 276213000-6 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 300,247.68 300,247.68 300,247.68 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 94686001-6 034ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 94686005-6 034PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.070 0.069 0.070 1 94686000-6 034RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.050 0.049 0.050 1 94686006-6 034RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 276213022-6 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3.23 3.23 3.23 0.000 0.000 1 276213023-6 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 276213029-6 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213028-6 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,723,180.54 6,723,180.54 6,723,180.54 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 276213026-6 16-01 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3,153,833.94 3,153,833.94 3,153,833.94 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 276213020-6 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 838,470.62 838,470.62 838,470.62 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 218848001-6 2017A&B INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 4.80 4.80 4.80 0.000 0.000 1 218848008-6 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,957.00 17,957.00 17,957.00 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2021 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 218848013-2 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848000-6 2017B DS First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,556,877.19 1,556,877.19 1,556,877.19 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 218848002-6 2017B PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 989.29 989.29 989.29 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 218848009-6 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 13,121,654.33 13,121,654.33 13,121,654.33 0.020 0.020 0.020 1 233358009-6 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-6 RDA-021NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-6 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-6 RDA-06AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA071NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDA07PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDA07RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA10INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343001-6 RDA10PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA10RSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01 SPTAXI1 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 NL! CP Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2021 Page 3 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate YTM 360 YTM 365 Days to Maturity Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03-1 bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 034ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 034 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2020 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 034 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 8,143,767.12 8,143,767.12 8,143,767.12 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 307,153.52 307,153.52 307,153.52 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 814,859.63 814,859.63 814,859.63 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,421,194.27 1,421,194.27 1,421,194.27 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK 438.42 438.42 438.42 0.000 0.000 1 164742006-0 03-06 Cash USBANK 02/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 Subtotal and Average 40,031,760.17 39,691,950.74 39,691,950.74 39,691,950.74 0.104 0.106 1 Retention Escrow Account NOBEL COMPANY 3354 Banner Bank 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury Subtotal and Average 724.950.02 05/01 /2021 07/01/2020 07/01/2020 07/01/2020 07/01/2020 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL CDR 07/01/2020 233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2020 Subtotal and Average 2.00 2,702.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 722,404.17 725,106.18 2,702.01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 722,404.17 725,106.18 2,702.01 0.150 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 722,404.17 0.063 725,106.18 0.148 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.062 0.062 0.150 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 0.000 1 n naz 1 0.063 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 NL! CP Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2021 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Trust Accounts 6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 23.980 23.652 23.980 1 Subtotal and Average 16,823,847.48 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 16,946,335.21 23.652 23.980 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 44,099,919.89 44,155,920.31 44,099,919.89 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,889.48 1,891.88 1,889.48 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 42,831,370.41 42,885,759.95 42,831,370.41 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 Subtotal and Average 86,933,179.78 86,933,179.78 87,043,572.14 86,933,179.78 0.334 0.339 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3133EMQGO 01259 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/10/2021 1,000,000.00 989,160.00 1,000,000.00 0.320 0.316 0.320 1,350 02/10/2025 313OAKQ41 01258 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 1,000,000.00 986,220.00 1,000,000.00 0.520 0.513 0.520 1,702 01/28/2026 3130ALEU4 01260 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2021 1,000,000.00 994,070.00 1,000,000.00 0.350 0.345 0.350 1,273 11/25/2024 3130ALWV2 01261 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/21/2021 1,000,000.00 1,002,320.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 1.011 1.025 1,785 04/21/2026 3130AM2V3 01262 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/29/2021 1,000,000.00 1,000,200.00 1,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 1,428 04/29/2025 3130AMNMO 01263 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/2021 1,000,000.00 999,370.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,821 05/27/2026 3134GBGZ9 01232 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 04/27/2017 1,000,000.00 1,012,620.00 1,000,000.00 2.000 1.964 1.991 240 01/27/2022 3134GSMF9 01246 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 05/30/2018 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.000 2.959 3.000 724 05/26/2023 3134GXJL9 01257 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 1,000,000.00 987,400.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,673 12/30/2025 Subtotal and Average 7,967,741.94 8,000,000.00 7,971,360.00 8,000,000.00 0.728 0.738 1,409 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133EJT74 01249 Federal Farm Credit Bank 11/15/2018 1,000,000.00 1,013,600.00 1,000,000.00 3.050 3.008 3.050 167 11/15/2021 3133ELMA9 01254 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/07/2020 1,000,000.00 1,026,070.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 797 08/07/2023 3133ELTU8 01256 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/18/2020 1,000,000.00 1,016,340.00 1,000,000.00 0.920 0.907 0.920 1,021 03/18/2024 3130AHF81 01251 Federal Home Loan Bank 10/25/2019 1,000,000.00 1,006,170.00 1,000,000.00 1.600 1.578 1.600 146 10/25/2021 3135GOU92 01250 Federal National Mtg Assn 01/11/2019 1,000,000.00 1,015,830.00 1,000,000.00 2.625 2.589 2.625 224 01/11/2022 Subtotal and Average 5,000,000.00 5,000,000.00 5,078,010.00 5,000,000.00 1.897 1.923 471 Total and Average 165,251,959.95 157,296,573.91 157,456,336.27 157,296,573.91 2.857 2.897 88 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 NL! CP Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash May 31, 2021 Page 5 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 WORKERS BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2020 20,049.87 20,049.87 20,049.87 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2020 3,911.00 3,911.00 3,911.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 23,957,068.81 23,957,068.81 23,957,068.81 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2020 5,790.00 5,790.00 5,790.00 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 165,251,959.95 1 181,283,393.59 181,443,155.95 181,283,393.59 2.857 2.897 88 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 07/20/2021 10:11 NL! CP Run Date: 07/20/2021 - 10:11 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution to Establish the Amount of the Voter -Approved Measure C Annual Special Tax Levy for Fiscal Year 2021-22 PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS BACKGROUND: Beginning Fiscal Year 1997-98, the Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Arterial Street Lights Rates and Charges previously levied by the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) were replaced by the City of Temecula's Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. The purpose of the Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax is to provide for the ongoing operations, maintenance and servicing of the City's public parks, recreational facilities; recreational and human services programs; landscaped median maintenance costs; and energy costs for arterial street lighting and traffic signals. Pursuant to City Ordinance 96-21, the City Council is also empowered to establish the amount of the tax levy each fiscal year. As a result, it is recommended that the amounts to be levied for Fiscal Year 2021-22 shall be the maximum tax rate approved by voters within the following categories: $ 74.44 per single family residential dwelling unit $ 55.83 per multi -family residential dwelling unit $ 148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $ 297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $ 446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property $ 148.88 per acre of golf course property $ 37.22 per acre of agricultural property The Parks/Street Lighting Services Special Tax is levied in the same manner, at the same time as the TCSD Rates and Charges, and collected on the annual property tax bills. The anticipated revenue based on the assessed rate from all taxable parcels within the City for Fiscal Year 2021-22 is $3,745,249. This revenue is allocated 50% to the General Fund, to provide funding for Parks Maintenance and 50% to the Temecula Community Services District, to provide funding for the multitude of recreation programs, services and facilities. The difference in operating costs over levy revenue is offset by recreational revenues, user fees, interest income, fund balance, and contributions from the voter -approved one -cent sales tax (Measure S). This will be the twenty-third consecutive year that the General Fund, and now the Measure S Fund, has contributed to the funding of the parks, programs, facilities, and services provided by the TCSD. To make the City's levy of the special tax consistent with the County's application of ad valorem property taxes and with the City's historical administration of the special tax, City Staff further recommends that the tax rate be set at $0.00 for any parcel of property that: (i) qualifies for an exemption from ad valorem taxation under California law, (ii) is owned by a federally recognized Tribal Government, (iii) is owned by a homeowners association and used by the owners and/or occupants of the respective residential development in a manner incidental to residential occupancy or (iv) is zoned for use as open space. FISCAL IMPACT: The $3,745,249 in Special Tax revenue will fund park and recreational facilities maintenance, recreational, human services and cultural arts programs throughout the City. Fifty percent of the levy is receipted in the City's General Fund and 50% is receipted in the Temecula Community Services District Fund. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution to Levy the Parks/Lighting Special Tax RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE AMOUNT OF THE SPECIAL TAX LEVY FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 TO PROVIDE FOR RECREATION AND HUMAN SERVICES PROGRAMS AND THE OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND SERVICING OF PUBLIC PARKS AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES, MEDIAN LANDSCAPING, AND ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTS AND TRAFFIC SIGNALS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Pursuant to the authority of Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, Government Code Section 37100.5, and other applicable law, the City Council adopted, and the voters of the City of Temecula approved, Ordinance No. 96-21, levying and assessing a special tax on each parcel of property in the City of Temecula for each fiscal year, commencing with Fiscal Year 1997-1998. Section 2. The maximum amount of said special tax for each fiscal year as established by Ordinance No. 96-21 is $74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit, $55.83 per multi -family residential dwelling unit, $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone, $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone, $446.64 per acre of non- residential improved property and $37.22 per acre for agricultural uses. Section 3. The City of Temecula has experienced a large amount of mixed use (both residential and commercial) development primarily within the Temecula Old Town area. As a result, all mixed use development assessment for the Special Tax will be calculated using the number and type of dwelling units and the per acre charge for non-residential improved property. Section 4. Pursuant to Ordinance No. 96-21 the City Council is empowered to establish the amount of the special tax levy annually each fiscal year, in amounts not to exceed the maximum amounts specified in Section 2 of this Resolution, as is required to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in the Ordinance. Section 5. The City Council hereby determines that the maximum rates will be required in order to provide an adequate level of service in accordance with the purposes set forth in Ordinance No. 96-21, and hereby establishes the following amounts to be levied as a special tax for Fiscal Year 2021-22: $ 74.44 per single-family residential dwelling unit $ 55.83 per multi -family residential dwelling unit $148.88 per acre of vacant property in a residential zone $297.76 per acre of vacant property in a non-residential zone $446.64 per acre of non-residential improved property $148.88 per acre of golf course property $ 37.22 per acre of agricultural property Section 6. Notwithstanding Section 5 of this Resolution the tax rate shall be $0.00 for any parcel of property that: (i) qualifies for an exemption from ad valorem taxation under California law, (ii) is owned by a federally recognized Tribal Government, (iii) is owned by a homeowners' association and used by the owners and/or occupants of the respective residential development in a manner incidental to residential occupancy or (iv) is zoned for use as open space. Section 7. The special tax shall be collected in the same manner, on the same dates, and shall be subject to the same penalties and interest as other charges and taxes fixed and collected by the County of Riverside on behalf of the City of Temecula. Said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall constitute a lien upon the parcel upon which it is levied until it has been paid, and said special tax, together with all penalties and interest thereon, shall until paid, constitute a personal obligation of the City of Temecula by the persons who own the parcel on the date the tax is due. All laws applicable to the levy, collection and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to the special tax, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. Section 8. The revenue raised by the special tax shall be placed in a special fund to be used only for the purposes of operating, maintaining and servicing public parks and recreational facilities, recreational and community services programs, median landscaping, arterial street lights and traffic signals throughout the City of Temecula and administrative expenses incurred by the City in connection therewith. Section 9. The special tax shall not be imposed upon a federal or state governmental agency or another local governmental agency or upon any parcel of property that is exempt from the special tax imposed by this ordinance pursuant to any provision of the Constitution or any paramount law. Section 10. The Director of Finance is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 2021, the property tax roll with the special tax enumerated for each parcel not exempt therefrom; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such special tax as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore. Section 11. If a property owner subject to the special tax challenges or questions the levy of the special tax against such property owners' property, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2021, pursuant to procedures established by the City. N Section 12. If a property owner subject to the special tax believes that payment of the special tax for Fiscal Year 2021-22 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the City Clerk before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2021, pursuant to the procedures established by the City, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 13. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity or unconstitutionality shall not affect any other provision or applications, and to this end the provision of this Resolution are declared to be serverable. The City Council does hereby declare that it would have adopted this Resolution and each section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrases, parts or portions hereof are declared invalid or unconstitutional. Section 14. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27ffi day of July, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt a Resolution to Approve the Solid Waste and Recycling Rates for Commercial Customers for Fiscal Year 2021-22 PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BACKGROUND: In accordance with the Franchise Agreement between the City of Temecula and CR&R Incorporated, the rates charged for refuse collection and recycling for residential and commercial services within the City of Temecula are subject to annual review and modification. The modification methodology is outlined in the franchise agreement and stipulates the conditions upon which rates may be adjusted on an annual basis at each July 1st to reflect the changes in various applicable indices. The commercial rates for fiscal year 2021-22 will include a .78% increase due to changes in CPI, as reported by the U.S. Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics for the Los Angeles - Riverside -Orange Counties. In addition, the Riverside County Department of Waste Resources has indicated they will adjust their landfill disposal rate by 2.25%, from $31.99 per ton to $32.71 per ton for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The attached Exhibit D reflects the adjusted FY2021-22 Solid Waste and Recycling Schedule of Rates for collection services, as part of the Franchise Agreement between the City of Temecula and CR & R Inc. Commercial rates vary based on the bin size and frequency of collection. These rates will be in effect July 1, 2021. FISCAL IMPACT: Solid waste and recycling services for commercial businesses are paid for directly by the customers receiving service. No additional costs will be incurred by the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. CR & R Rate Adjustments FY2021-22 Cover Letter 3. Exhibit D — Schedule of Rates FY2021-22 4. Department of Waste Resources — Disposal Fees FY2021-22 RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO APPROVE THE SOLID WASTE AND RECYCLING RATES FOR COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: A. The City of Temecula and CR&R Incorporated entered into an exclusive solid waste Franchise Agreement on May 28, 1991, as amended on August 27, 1996, June 24, 1997, July 25, 2000, June 13, 2006, October 27, 2015, and November 28, 2017 ("Franchise Agreement"), for the collection, transportation, recycling, composting, and disposal of solid waste and construction debris and for providing temporary bin/roll off services in the City. B. The Franchise Agreement specifically provides for and stipulates the conditions upon which rates may be adjusted on an annual basis at each July 1', specifically the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics designated change in Consumer Price Index ("CPI") from the previous calendar year, and changes to the Riverside County Department of Waste Resources landfill disposal rates. C. Based on the formula set forth in the Franchise Agreement, the following applicable indices have been used to calculate the rate adjustments for Fiscal Year 2021-22: 1. The CPI from January 2020 through December 2020 has increased by .78% and will be applied to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 rate adjustments. 2. The Riverside County Department of Waste Resources landfill tipping fee has increased 2.25% and will be applied to the Fiscal Year 2021-22 rate adjustments. D. Based on the formula set forth in the Franchise Agreement and the findings set forth above, the City Council hereby approves the maximum solid waste and recycling rates for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as shown in "Exhibit D" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. for Fiscal Year 2021-22, as set forth in the Franchise Agreement. E. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of July, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk cry&MQ environmental servIces LAj March 15, 2021 Mr. Pat Thomas Director of Public Works City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, Ca. 92590 Re: Annual Rate Adjustment Dear Pat, Pursuant to our current Solid Waste and Recycling Services Agreement with the City of Temecula, CR&R Incorporated (CR&R) respectfully submits the attached information which outlines our Annual Rate Adjustment request for fiscal year 2021-2022. As you are aware, our current agreement stipulates the conditions upon which our rates may be adjusted on an annual basis. Per the agreement, these rates shall be adjusted each July 1st to reflect the changes in various applicable indices. In reviewing the data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) for January 2020 through December 2020, the designated CPI Index has increased by .78%. In addition, the County of Riverside's Waste Management Department has indicated that they will adjust their landfill disposal rate by 2.25% from $31.99 per ton to $32.71 per ton. After these adjustments are made, the new standard residential rate for fiscal year 2021-2022 will be $22.55 per month, a very modest increase of 1.3%. Therefore, based upon the data supplied by both the BLS and the County of Riverside, we have prepared the attached rate schedules which pass these adjustments through to the various rates. These new rates would become effective July 1, 2021. As discussed previously, CR&R does not intend to pass on any additional costs related to the implementation of SB 1383 at this time. We are in the process of hiring an individual to help us manage the process as we begin to plan for rollouts in 2022 but we don't have a firm number yet on what the total additional costs will be. If things don't change we will need to add resources for route audits, material sampling and a significant amount of additional reporting. Since we don't have a firm number on those exact costs yet, we don't believe it is fair to add them at this time. We expect to know what those costs are for your July 2022 rate adjustments. QL We are however proposing to memorialize a few on -demand fees that we do not have currently listed in our rate sheets. These are fees for services requested by individual customers, not cost increases that will affect all customers. The fees are as follows: Commercial Bin Delivery Fee: $49.87 This fee pays for the delivery of a commercial dumpster. It is a one-time cost when we deliver a dumpster. Rolloff False Run Fee: $73.56 We would charge this fee after a customer has called us to go out and service their rolloff box and when we get there, it is not ready for service. It could be because the box is blocked, the gates are closed or for whatever reason, we can't get to it. That is when a "False Run Fee" would be applied. Locking Bin Fee: 25.16/bin/occurrence This fee would be applied to a customer who requests a locking bar be placed on his/her dumpster. It is only applied upon request. Commercial Bin Stinger Fee: 28.98/bin/occurrence This fee is applied to customers who have placed their bin in a location that is not accessible by our regular collection truck. As a result of the location requested by the customer, we have to send out a separate smaller truck to pull the bin out every week so that the larger collection truck can empty the container. Once it's emptied, the smaller bin truck puts the bin back where the customer wants it to go. Extra Residential Recycling Cart: 10.35/month If a customer calls us and requests an extra trash or greenwaste cart we currently charge them an additional $10.35 per month for that cart. We currently do not charge for extra recycling carts. Due to the drastic change in global recycling markets, we can no longer provide this service for free. We propose to charge the same amount for recycling as for trash and greenwaste, All of these fees are included in your proposed rate sheets. As we have stated in prior years, we greatly appreciate our long standing relationship with the City of Temecula, as well as the opportunity that we have had to be of service to your residents and businesses. It truly has been and continues to be an honor and a privilege to be of service to the City. Please do not hesitate to call us if you should have any questions or comments. We look forward to any further assistance that we may be able to provide. Respectfully, J. Alex Braicovich Senior Regional Vice President CR&R Incorporated Cc: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst Rodney Tidwell, Public Works Chrystal Denning, CR&R Bill Higginbotham, CR&R CITY of TENIF:CULA EXHIBIT "D" Schedule of Rates (effective July 1, 2021) Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and disposal grantee billing Monthly Rate (without Extraordinary Recycling Fee) $ 22.55 Monthly AD Rate $ 2.23 Extraordinary Recycling Fee $ 0.54 2 Mechanized single family detached residential collection, recycling, composting, transfer, and disposal parcel charge Monthly Rate (without Extraordinary Recycling Fee) $ 22.55 Monthly AD Rate $ 2.23 Extraordinary Recycling Fee $ 0.54 3 Mechanized single family detached residential additional refuse, recycling, and composting container grantee billing Monthly Rate: $ 10.35 4 Single family detached residential additional bulky item pick up - grantee billing Pick Up Rate: $ 12.08 per item 5 Commercial. industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates( one 2 cubic yard bin) with the following pickups per week 1 x week $ 116.46 2 x week $ 231.61 3 x week $ 346.72 4 x week $ 461.83 5 x week $ 576.97 6 x week $ 692.08 7 x week $ 807.23 Compacted 2 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate 6 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates (one 3 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week: l x week $ 133.23 2 x week $ 265.13 3 x week $ 397.06 4 x week $ 528.96 5 x week $ 660.82 6 x week $ 792.73 7 x week $ 924.65 Compacted 3 Cubic Yard monthly: 2.5 x monthly rate 7 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residentialrrc� cling monthly bin rates( one 3 cubic yard bin) with the following pickups per week l x week $ 56.71 2 x week $ 113.41 3 x week $ 170.10 4 x week $ 226.79 5 x week $ 283.45 6 x week $ 340.17 7 x week $ 396.83 8 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential refuse monthly bin rates( one 4 cubic yard bin) with the following pickups per week: I x week $ 150.04 2 x week $ 298.79 3 x week $ 447.51 4 x week $ 596.26 5 x week $ 744.98 6 x week $ 893.69 7 x week $ 1,042.44 Compacted 4 Cubic Yard monthly rate: 2.5 x monthly rate CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT "D" Schedule of Rates (effective July I, 2021) 9 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential recveline monthly bin rates ( one 4 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week 1 x week $ 75.06 2 x week $ 150.17 3 x week $ 225.21 4 x week $ 300.30 5 x week $ 375.38 6 x week $ 450.46 7 x week $ 525.50 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residentialreoein monthly cart rate ( one 96 gallon cart) with the following pick ups per week: I x week $ 50.63 10 Temporary 3 cubic yard bin rate: $ 117.71 11 Extra Temporary or Regular Service pick up: $ 65.49 per pick up (Includes all bin sizes 2, 3 and 4 yards) 12 Commercial and Rolloff Setup Fee $ 50.39 13 Redeliver and reinstatement rate: $ 4241 per occurrence 14 Roll -off Delivery Fee: $ 73.97 per bin 15 Roll -off disposal rate: $ 263.41 + 16 Roll -off recycling rate: $ 263.41 plus market value 17 Roll -off compactor rate: $ 366.76 + 18 Roll -off recycling compactor rate: $ 366.76 plus market value 19 Scheduled Extra Green Waste pick up (up to 10 bags): $ 10.00 per pick up 20 Non -Scheduled Extra Green Waste pick up (up to 10 bags): $ 25.00 per pick up 21 E-Waste Pick up: no charge 22 "Hard to service' vehicle usage rate: no charge 23 "Hard to service" bin moving rate: no charge 24 Special bin lids (locking/CBL) rate: no charge 25 Deodorizing / replacing bin rate: no charge 26 Recycle Bin Contamination $ 50.34 27 MRF Fee: $ 52.08 per ton 28 C&D Fee: $ 52.08 per Ion 29 Inert Disposal: $ 134.38 per load 30 AD Fee: $ 83.09 per ton 31 Extra Food Waste Pail $ 7.40 each CITY OF TEMECULA EXHIBIT "D" Schedule of Rates (effective July 1, 2021) 32 Commercial Bin Delivery Fee $ 49.87 per container 33 Rollff False Run Fee $ 73.56 per incident 34 Commercial Stinger Fee $ 28.98 per bin, per pickup 35 Locking Bin Fee $ 25.16 per bin, per month Commercial Organic AD Rates 36 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residentialnon-food monthly bin rates ( one 2 cubic yard bin ) with the following pick ups per week: 1 x week 146.99 2 x week $ 292.96 3 x week S 438,92 4 x week S 584.89 5 x week S 730.88 6 x week $ 876.84 7 x week 5 1,022.81 37 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential food monthly bin rates( one 2 cubic yard bin) with the following pickups per week l x week $ 218.94 2 x week $ 436.88 3 x week $ 654.79 4 x week $ 872.69 5 x week $ 1,090.66 6 x week $ 1,308.56 7 x week $ 1,526.47 38 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residentialnon-food monthly bin rates( one 3 cubic yard bin) with the following pickups per week I x week $ 194.17 2 x week $ 387.37 3 x week $ 580.52 4 x week $ 773.71 5 x week $ 966.83 6 x week $ 1,160.01 7 x week $ 1,353.20 39 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residential non-food monthly bin rates ( 64-gallon cart) with the following pick ups per week 1 x week $ 40.10 2 x week $ 80.18 3 x week $ 120.29 4 x week $ 160.38 5 x week $ 200.49 6 x week $ 240.59 Extra pickup $ 29.73 40 Commercial, industrial, and multi -family residentialfood monthly bin rates ( 64-gallon cart) with the following pick ups per week 1 x week $ 54.23 2 x week 5 108.45 3 x week S 162.67 4 x week S 216.90 5 x week 5 271.13 6 x week $ 325.38 Extra pickup S 40.01 �Wn uWi 24.1.22 naa omo rn bc`h°-pA8B�y'i8 m`s m'r D �p f4 N N O G h -D O N n (-D 1MO 10 IN N w h Q n N N W CI (pp W N ONi O N W Ohl N (pp ON i0 Oh WW ap pO Oi ' W Q h 01 p N O CV r N N N {"1 Q Y) W W r N M 10 10 h OI r r N N I7 l'� N V Vl 1� W O r N w wwww w w w w N w v t N Y I M M y i i. N /+ N N u 1 u. w w www M w w. a g w u l w N w w w w w u f N w wwwww w eeeee e gee eee eee eeeeeV IIOIl�� Q �{npp {(�pp fp�l O O CW'1 (O� V OhD W OW1 � p� NNNOO� {O Q 0NN(�]mh On NN a www Qwww pwww ON tupl veto en -h um.y yew ypiNw✓1 N m {N� tNa y uppl W O �O �OWppf �OWppi �pnp 1Qnp OWl 10 tWO � N t'1 O N N O O r W 10 R N N N t� t7 O 10 U] N . h ' • ' a Y h M n N w w w w w w w w w n w N g w w n w w N q c m O LL U O C p p p ww wwp fpwp w{w� pp8 {�(pp ��N O NN N N t70 d Q 00 mol V 000 CRoom 00 ra 0 0'o" NN000 r'-0 H L eeeeee egeeeee eeeeeee eeeeeee O O O O O O W W W W W W W 0000000 �- O W N M Ohi N N M(p lO hN{� O T pWp rd�OyyI W.b�ppO r anN y NO O —NrXMwNDhOI p m r {7 w Owe wwwww pwpw w(wpp www www pw �wp w}} w N O0 � 0uW 10 j � m 00�00 tON NN� O (awn pOp n W rNp OpWi 1W0 V 10 N R 01 O OWM1 V N V w h nwngwww N m W Q h S n N n O wwq nw qn M a wwwnn wwy www ub ""W"w ww �pwpwwwwww �w ppw pw pw wppw�w apw wwwwwww wwwww pw ppw� N .NO fh�O NNn PW1RO Qn O � 7�� n �IMOO � W �r (V tN00 rtV f7N W h W � N V NIU 001 OOr �NfV l7 � [V R�I�100 w w w w w w w w w N w w w w w w y 0 l M w w w w w n w .w w w w w W g W w o w w V m o w w o w o o o w" m ;! ;! 8 ;! 7 1N0 IND C 0 0 0 00 00 L U wwwwww ww N N 0 n n n N vim m �00o 00 o0 c c f E tri n �j www ww ww O C e e e e e e e e q �mm88mm ;; m J m W yi 0 0 vl I�i vi vi > O O f- C N � T! NN W NN 0101 m 0 0 (V 0 0 O G N O �, Vwww ww ww c � 8 T � qq11 12 7 p O O O O O m e bbb 2�55 Ie0 �� 00 IWO M N Nqm1� 4`p 0 OO 000 w F W 2 N W G Q wL) U. O a OMO, OR IC�l, m V�� A INO N 2 V� n A N C f0 W O N C W N 00 R h n r 0 r- N M M V O— N m o V a--" M m v w wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww e N N N N N N N N h h h h h h h N N N N N N N h h h h h h h N N N N N N N h h h h h h h N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 woo Vlwww wgMw"ww wwww Nww e e e e e e e e a eeeee e a eee e e e o 8 hhhhhhh M M M M M M M hhr-hhhh M M M M M M M hr-hhl. M M M M M M m N co OI OI OI W OI m 0I O O O O O G G OI OI OI OI Ol OI OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ol OI OI Ol OI OI OI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w H n g q w w w n g n w w n w M w N w w u f V r J c `m .. 'aE y0 m �� U V L U O J p .1 C C- 'a SSS£�L.SSS C c G C C SS c C C C c LSS.L.. S� �C c C c c C LSSL.LLL C C c C O O C m tp O C c o '$ u c'n 3 q O O O O G O E E E E E E E O O O Oo000 E E E* E E E E E g O E O O O E E E E E E E O G O G O E E E E E} E E} * } } ��pp aa ��pp M O O O N m N o O O O yy W W 10 10 N 01 r m p M �p OI N y h O h Q OI fO M r pp W N W OI M h W M h r W O M 1� h OI r M �O W 10 V N r W h N (V O O G r O O '- r IV M M Q O r N N M Q w o O O r r N N t7 O r Ni vi 0 0 U7 w ww www wwwwwwwwww wwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww e ee m W W egg WPM W eeeeee eee e W W e eeee eeegeee m eeeeeee eee eeee e eeeeee h h h h h h W W W W W W m W h h h h h h h 1A h h W W W W W h h h h h W W W' W W h h h h h h W W W W W W W h h h h h h h W W W W W W W h h h h h h h W W W W W W W h h h h 0 00 000 0000000000 00000 0000000 0000000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 h h h 0006000 e ee eee eeeeeeeeegn eeeee eeeeeee eeeeeee eeeeeee eeeeeee O O O W W W O W W w 000 0 0O 0 0 0 0 0 �O W wyl Y)w W W W V1 w W Y)w 0000000 w W_10 W �O w�O W mm h hh nnl: gnr�nnng000 58888 nr�nn�nn n�l�nnni� 888888o III o I� I� N �� �GhO. O W m O W OWI �OWpi �rppn OWi t01D t�NtO N N O O,09 V N r N N M i0 N N m h N n w w w w w w N v t www W N w V t I n M v a N w• n N OO! wr O) i0O m 0w 01(0 N NY.1 Nw n Nm 7 r PW1 N 0 01 W W N urn wvi vtw NwNv�N u.h Inw NMMN y. wwwwwww N a E E E E o LL u u a u w 7 u 7 o v E 0 LL N t9 V v co ff EO V U m a a B C co m Y Y Y Y Y Y m Y Y Y Y Y Y m Y Y Y a� � o E L E rn 0 0 0 o o w K O C LL E E': ,� # 3 3: a 3 U K(r¢� Ir Ir g U c o o 6 o o m x x x x x x x m x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x Q W U w U J W r N M a 10 W h K r N M O w W h a' — N M O w W h K r N M Q 10 W h N D W a O O p�pN pM N7 N tpp N M M o N o N W e e *eee * e N 0 � 0 m m M 0 0 A o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z V p 0 p pp 00Ntp7o0N tM0 A N N O a` wwpwwwpw w t(77pp OOQOmio Om,7 N V r r Q M On, n gyp N j W t`1NMY � o. W w w w w w w w w c W E LL o O W w w w w w w w w oo OOOOO Epp N W uI � rNG01V O M b H Yf ,n VI ✓+ �n N .n w 1" 7 L rJ' fi 5 5 fi fi L 2 E E E E E E E E aakkkkk k °n° °nNS°d$8 8 O N N M IT O � L V w w w w w w p w W e e e ** e e * m00mmmDm M L n n n n r r n n U L 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u **eeee 0 rj O O O O O O O O 8800888 8 to 00701 OOP V NNp O r Q N p n1 n Iap N N > N N M O N a w yv,w u,ww Ny W O, mm O, IOO fpO�.[I O � MYN'11���mpp NpN N N�ntO. OI .M-t7 O ymm p�aDm ��pA tO0 N T10 m Irk pO 0N WO m p� mm —uO'1 04Rp-NVN^mO N O1N0 CV NN wwwwwww wwwwwww wwwwwww u, v, v. ut N u, w yy yr vlw w w *eee**e NN NN N N **See *ee m tDm wm tD m ee**ee* tp eeee* a *e*eee N — r r 1p t010 (01p t0 — ,-- — — — — — NN NeN N - — — r — — O O NNNNNN — — — — ,- O N OI ONi m m m O, 01 1yD fpp0� 7 1r�1 N N V N r p— N O m O, OWl O (Nm� Q b W 6 ppNp 1h. (�mpp pO Nlfl p� pm pN OaD N f0S N N �NtNONNN V l� 0110 eia r{t{I+p+p0,�1 Yp0I [Nn V voa Va ��mn00N{pNpp vVi �Nn w1�0, Vm/ NmN(I wntp wN Nn(�� Nyy� VY0I w0Om vm�y w wv wm m N 198I OD mw Nw r Nt0 Vrf 0h10 N 099 N M M 0 N wwwwwww wv,y u>.y v,w wwwwwww wwwwww w qwy wwq w 2t7S`N81H nu�i o�vNin N RO tDO MN M n w(V b Mt06 N'EO N NNv, v�y, Vl Vr •A wv� NYiN Npp NppN Np �Vpp, pupl pu, 10N� V OIpN NMImp N Om, �(r'] a W NI00 V aD V I p N N N w w w N N y w w w w w w w p p p ** e e** e * e* e** e e e e* e e e N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NfV NN NN(`! NNNfV N [V N IV NN N [V NN e e * e e e e O o 0 o o o 0 6666886 0 OrQOr lh N f0 mm O h O D N M O N N O N w w w w w w w 5555fifi� E E E E E E E kkkkkaa imNNNpp WCDO — — NNM t7 wwwwwww eeeeeee m�mmm�m n n n n n r r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W.817o M N n O Ip M N "IC 4NMVYI N 0 N w YpI w VmI N�Ip co B W Ip �.DN�N88 N O N n wwwwwww eeeeeee 0000000 8888889 O N N ci N (O apD O N aVlnm� wwwwwww fiSfiLLfiS 0 0 o E E E E E E E E E rim 1p (Nym No N m M O r — N (l M M W 0 w 0 w w w ee eeeee mmM�Mmm r r n n n n n oo0ocoo m N N O p h N M vi n of "NNtp WHO oWO w 00 of u1 V,y C M G Ip 2 8�2 N O N m O N IOn w w w w w w w 00eaeeee 00 0000 8888888 n � ODNOIp N O N M O r4 p w w w w w w 0 0 yr w w N w ee a*eee mmmm�m� n r n r n n n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O � �NNIQ N leu�M MOD N M O O N In of y r.f N III N N O n N n 0 N t77 R N f0 m w w w w w w w �95mem 00� Wit`! C4 O w VI w V 0 V w n M O r O O IO N N W O t7 1. t0 0 0 0 •- — — O y N wr N N N w * e * * e * e N N NNN IID Y] N N N N N N Cl NN NNN N t`1 e**eee e 000000 0 COS 0o000 8 m�oIp�BN o w w w w w" w S�Sfifi55 � EEEEEEE O c6 00.-� w w w w 0 p w *****g * mm mrOD r r OD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 N m a � n 9 On 0 tn�! Onl W 0 tY m m V O N N w w w y w eeeeee e 000000 O 999999 8 rn rn m n a N M 0 n ap N N r O N N N ls;�Sfi0 E E E E E E n N C tp bD O M 0 0 0 0 eeeeee * MWmmm�D m n n r n n n n 0a0o00 0 a n a rn M nlIvpp{N�mtppp��app w u/ ur w V 1 N w V8ppNP� 19 N Ot0 MfnON M N N M w w w w w Ow V E ° W P u a u Y rn W u m 'E G W p W U N Y N O tl L YU a m W Y Y Y Y W O Y Y Y Y Y -1 C Y Y Y Y Y y Y Y O Y Y Y Y Y Y a W Y Y ]C Y W 39 40 NM V Nt0r K-x Oz NM ONWn U. NMnN ID 2 NMON 10r Z NM nN Ip Q LL NM ON tp Q _ U.S. BUREAU OF LABOR STATISTICS Databases, Tables & Calculators by Subject Change Output Options:=roIII: I 2011 v To: L 2021 v S 11 inC:ude grJPhS ®,rcLide 3nru31 averages hlnre Fortnnttinp Ontlol Data extlactEd on FcorL13f•i H. 2021 r5:55A7 Pklf CPI for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) Series Id: CUUR549ASA01-2 Not Seasons ly=.dlustEd Series Title: All i-ems less She ICEr In Los Angeles -Long 6eacl`-Ankelm, CA, all urban C0tSLI )Ier5, rot seasonaU_y 3d uSied Area: LosAngele long Beach -Anaheim. CA Item: All items less shelter Base Period: 1982-8,1=100 Download: Q 1 xlax Year Jan Feb i Mar ' Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual' HALF1 HALF2 2011 209.062 210.E64 214.028215.498 115.W. 213,808 212.202 212.97E 214.564 214597 21.1.215 212.3,13 213.285 213.088 213.483 2012 214.7,12 215.904 218-816 218.4158 218.457 216.740; 21G.127 218.077 219.094 221.751 218-360 215.926 217.705 217-188 218.223 2013 218.522 220.919 221-001 219.482 219.521 219.075 218-502 218.G3G 218.948 219.128 217.484 217.339 219.054 219.753 218.355 2014 218.G14 219.973 221.97,1 221.692 222.92E 222.9,12 222.330 221.8,11 221.494 2e0.815 218.208 216.134 220.745 221.353 220.137 2015 214.533 216.374 219.281 218.858 222410 220.669 222,521 221,135 219-652 219.771 219.247 218.173 219.352 2LS-621 220.083 2016 220.019 219.387 219.558 220.292 221-281. 221,134 220.418 219.575 20.676 220.640 218.881 218,445 219.944 220.279 219,1509 2017 220.314 221.681 22247E 223.272! 223.718 223.265 223.536 223-6G3 224.951 22S.188 225.503 225.322 223.591 222-488 224.694 2018 227.71E 229.387 229.885 230.2081730-818 229.91S 230.,187 230-417 231-225 233.375 231.868 230.095 230.450 229.G55 231.2,15 2019 231.460 231.19E 232.548 235-395, 236.119. 231.840 234.910 234 219 235.978 238.399 23G.218 234-021 234.609 233.593 235.G24 2020 236.840 237.401 234.478 232.812 233,970 235.405 237.153 237-G7G 237.055 237.989 238.544 237.923 23G.437 235.141 237.723 2.022 239-459 12-Month Percent Change Series Id: CUUR549ASA0L2 Not Seasonaily Adjusted Series Title: All items less shelter in Los Angeles -Long BEach-Anaheim, CA, all urban carsumers, rot seasonally acllusted Area: Los Angeles -Long Beach -Anaheim; CA Item: All items I£ss shElter Base Period: 1082-84=100 Download: q 1 xlsx Year Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep OCt Nov Dec Annual HALF3 HALF2 2011 2.5 IA 4.3 1.7 'i-•I .I,1 3-1 3.5 4,6 4.0 4.4 2.8 3.8 3.9 3.7 2012 2.7 2.5 2-2 1A IA 1.4 1.8 2 4 2.1 3-3 1.9 1.7 2.1 1.9 2-2 2013 1.8 23 L.0 0.5 0-5 1.1 1.1 0-3 -0.1 -1.2 -0.4 0.7 r},G 1.2 0A 2014 0-0 -0.4 6.4 1.0 1.G 1.8 1.7 15 1-2 0.8 0.3 -0.b 0.8 0.7 0-8 2015 -1.0 •1.6 .1-2 •1-3 -0-4 •1.0 0-1 -0-3 -GA -0.5 0.5 0-0 -0.6 -1.2 0.0 2016 2.6 1.4 0.1 0.7 -0.3 0.2 -0.9 •0.7 0.0 0.4 •0.2 0.1 0.3 0.8 -0.2 2017 0.1 1.0 1.3 14 1.2 1.0 1.--1 1-9 2.4 2.1 3.0 3-1 1.7 1-0 2.3 2018 3A 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.1 3.0 3.1 3-0 2.8 3-u 2.8 2.1 3.1 3.2 2-9 2019 1.6 0.8 1.2 2.3 2-3 2.1 1.9 1.7 2.1 2.2 1.9 1.7 1.8 1.7 1.9 2020 2.3 2.7 0.8 -1.1 -0.9 0.2 1.0 1-5 0.5 -0.2 10 17 0.8 0.7 0.9 2021 0.7 aL RIVEIZSIDE COUNTY DEPAt't1-MENT Or- Hans W Kernkamp, General Manager -Chief Engineer DATE: February 22, 2021 TO: Waste Haulers FROM: Sandra Green — Assistant General Manager, Riverside County Department of Waste Reso Imes�- RE: Disposal Fee Increase — FY 2021/2022 Tile Riverside County Department of Waste Resources (Department) is responsible for assuring that there is, and will be in the Future, sufficient and accessible landfill space to properly serve the population of the County in its disposal needs. To fulfill this mandate, tine Department contirivally maintains and expands County landfill sites, and encourages, supports and develops recycling programs that minimize the dependence on landfill disposal facilities. Due to sustained increases in system -wide labor expenses, capital improvement costs, regulatory compliance costs and closed site maintenance, an increase in disposal rates is essential to allow for continued and improved services. This letter serves as a notice that subject to approval by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors, direct haul rates will increase in FY 21/22 by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), which is 2.25% for calendar year 2020. If approved, the new rates will become effective for tonnage deliveries starting on July 1, 2021. Long-term Waste Delivery Agreement (WDA) rates will be adjusted as outlined in each agreement. Processed green waste used as erosioli control at the landfills will continue to be charged at the $10 per ton rate for the Foreseeable future, as it provides a beneficial use to the landfill system. Thank you for your past cooperation and support, SG:sg cc: Keith Jones, LEA DOCS_GENERA L-N270922-v3-Notice to Haulers 779 22 14310 Fredericl, S(rrcf . ,llurenu Pulley, (A Y2553 • (951) 986 -3Z00 . /'((x (951) 411E-3105. 1'(4x (951.) 4116-3230 mvw rc iv(ISf e.Or(! �.� 1'rintccf nn rrc�-ilcr! paper Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration, Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize Solicitation of Construction Bids for Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, Project PW 11-10, Located at Friendship Park (formerly Pala Community Park) PREPARED BY: Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer Nino Abad, Associate Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt the Initial Study (IS) and Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, Project PW11-10; and 2. Direct staff to file the Notice of Determination (NOD); and 3. Approve the Plans and Specifications for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW 11-10; and 4. Authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids. BACKGROUND: The Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW11-10, is a project to protect City facilities located adjacent to flood control channels from potential damage by water and soil erosion. Each site is evaluated for susceptibility. Appropriate protective measures are developed, designed, and constructed such that flood plain management and safe operation of the facility are maintained. Staff has identified Friendship Park (formerly Pala Community Park) as requiring erosion mitigation consisting of a 427-foot-long sheet pile wall constructed underground along the northern boundary of the park, adjacent to the soccer field. The wall will be embedded approximately 35 feet below the park ground level. Thus, if erosion and significant sediment movement occurs within Temecula Creek during heavy storms, the embedded wall will support the park grounds. A sidewalk will be constructed generally along the top of the wall to mark its location and provide access around the soccer field. As required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) an Initial Study (IS) was prepared. The IS identified no impact or a less than significant impact for the following environmental areas of concern: • Aesthetics • Agriculture and Forestry Resources • Air Quality • Biological Resources • Cultural Resources • Geology and Soils • Greenhouse Gas Emissions • Hazards & Hazardous Materials • Hydrology and Water Quality • Land Use and Planning • Mineral Resources • Noise • Population & Housing • Public Services • Recreation • Transportation and Traffic • Utilities and Service Systems, and • Mandatory Finding of Significance The IS identified the following areas of potential concern that will be reduced to a less than significant impact with mitigation incorporated as summarized: • General: A qualified biologist will be required to conduct pre -construction survey and training for construction personnel and monitor construction activities to ensure practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint. • Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources: Require a certified archaeologist to monitor construction in coordination with the Pechanga Tribe. Implement recommendations for a pre -grading meeting with contractors, grading monitoring on a period and frequency as approved and coordinated with the Pechanga tribe, and cultural resources protection, avoidance, and curation as required in the event of resource discovery (Section Two Part IV MND). Under CEQA guidelines, an Initial Study (IS) determined a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) be completed for the project. The MND includes mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to a level of less than significant. Staff recommends that the City Council approve the IS and adopt an MND for this project. A summary of the proposed mitigation measures is included within the attached Final IS/MND and summarized in Section Two Part VI. The Notice of Intent to Adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration was posted on April 28, 2021. The corresponding public review comment period also commenced on April 28, 2021 and concluded on May 27, 2021. Notification signage was placed on the project site and a notice was placed in the local newspaper. The City of Temecula received two written comment letters which have been evaluated, addressed, and included in the Final IS/MND. The project plans, specifications, and contract documents are complete and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The bid documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works office. The Engineer's Estimate of construction is $1 million and the construction duration is estimated at 45 working days or approximately 2 months. FISCAL IMPACT: The Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2022-26, and is funded with General Fund and Measure S. There are sufficient funds in the project account to cover the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Mitigated Negative Declaration fee of $2,530.25 (includes $50.00 County filing fee) and estimated construction cost. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Initial Study Mitigated Negative Declaration 2. Notice of Determination 3. Project Description FINAL MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION Initial Study & Environmental Analysis For; PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair July 2021 Prepared For. City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951) 694-6400 Community Development Department Prepared By. 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton, California, 92831 TEL (714) 526-7500 1 FAX (714) 526-7004 1 www.cwecorp.com 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION ONE — INTRODUCTION I. PURPOSE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING CEQA II. INTENDED USE OF INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION III. REVIEW PERIOD IV. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS V. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST VI. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS VII. TIERED DOCUMENTS AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE SECTION TWO — CONTENTS OF AN INITIAL STUDY I. PROJECT SUMMARY, LOCATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING II. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND ANALYSIS 1. Aesthetics 2. Agriculture and Forest Resources 3. Air Quality 4. Biological Resources 5. Cultural Resources 6. Geology and Soils 7. Greenhouse Gas Emissions 8. Hazards and Hazardous Materials 9. Hydrology and Water Quality 10. Land Use and Planning 11. Mineral Resources 12. Noise 13. Population and Housing 14. Public Services 15. Recreation 16. Transportation/Traffic 17. Utilities and Service Systems 18. Mandatory Findings of Significance III. EARLIER ANALYSIS IV. PERSONS AND ORGANIZATIONS CONSULTED V. REFERENCES VI. MITIGATON MONITORING & REPORTING PROGRAM (IF ANY) SECTION THREE — NOTICES I. NOI - ND/MND II. NOD - ND/MND SECTION FOUR — COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 2 SECTION ONE — INTRODUCTION I. PURPOSE This document is a project level Initial Study for evaluation of potential environmental impacts resulting from the implementation of the proposed PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction) (Refer to Exhibit "A" & "B"). For purposes of this document, the PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair (Pala Park Sheet Pile Wall Construction) will be called the "proposed project" or "project". II. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) REQUIREMENTS AND GUIDELINES FOR IMPLEMENTING CEQA As defined by Section 15063 of the State of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines an Initial Study is prepared primarily to provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for determining whether an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), Negative Declaration, or Mitigated Negative Declaration would be appropriate for providing the necessary environmental documentation and clearance for any proposed project. According to Section 15065, an EIR is deemed appropriate for a particular proposal if the following conditions occur: • The proposal has the potential to substantially degrade quality of the environment. • The proposal has the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long- term environmental goals. • The proposal has possible environmental effects that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable. The proposal could cause direct or indirect adverse effects on human beings. According to Section 15070(a), a Negative Declaration is deemed appropriate if the proposal would not result in any significant effect on the environment. According to Section 15070(b), a Mitigated Negative Declaration is deemed appropriate if it is determined that though a proposal could result in a significant effect, mitigation measures are available to reduce these significant effects to less than significant levels. Regarding mitigation measures, it is not the intent of this document to "overlap" or restate conditions of approval that are commonly established for future projects or the proposed applications. Additionally, those other standard requirements and regulations that any development must comply with, that are outside the City's jurisdiction, are also not considered mitigation measures and therefore, will not be identified in this document. This Initial Study has determined that the proposed applications will not result in any potentially significant environmental impacts and therefore, a Negative Declaration is deemed as the appropriate document to provide necessary environmental evaluations and clearance. This Initial Study is prepared in conformance with the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code, Section 21000 et. seq.). In accordance with Section 15050 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Lead Agency is the public agency which has the principal responsibility for approving the necessary environmental clearances and analyses for any project in the 91 City. Pursuant to Section 15050 of the CEQA Guidelines, and Section 1.2 of the Temecula Environmental Review Procedures Handbook, (approved by Resolution No. 09-29 of the Temecula City Council) the City of Temecula is designated as the Lead Agency for both publicly and privately initiated projects. Consequently, the City is responsible for ensuring all projects comply with CEQA, pursuant to Section 17.01 of the Temecula Municipal Code. In addition, pursuant to Section 17.03.010 of the Temecula Municipal Code, the City of Temecula City Council, Planning Commission and/or Director of Community Development have the principal authority and responsibility for reviewing and approving projects and the necessary environmental clearances and analyses. III. INTENDED USES OF INITIAL STUDY AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION This Initial Study is an informational document which is intended to inform decision makers, other responsible or interested agencies, and the general public of potential environmental effects of the proposed applications. The environmental review process has been established to enable public agencies to evaluate environmental consequences and to examine and implement methods of eliminating or reducing any potentially adverse impacts. While CEQA requires that consideration be given to avoiding environmental damage, the Lead Agency and other responsible public agencies must balance adverse environmental effects against other public objectives, including economic and social goals. IV. REVIEW PERIOD The Initial Study, prepared for the project will be circulated for a period of 20 days (30-days if submitted to the State Clearinghouse for a ,project of area -wide significance) for public and agency review and comments. The review period for this document will be from April 28, 2021 to May 27, 2021. V. SCOPE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS For evaluation of environmental impacts, each question from the Environmental Checklist Form (Section Two - II) is summarized and responses are provided according to the analysis undertaken as part of the Initial Study. Impacts and effects will be evaluated and quantified, when appropriate. To each question, there are four possible responses, including: 1. No Impact: A "No Impact" response is adequately supported if the impact simply does not apply to the proposed project. 2. Less Than Significant Impact: A "Less Than Significant Impact" is chosen when the proposed project will have the potential to impact the environment; however, the impacts will be less than significant and no additional analysis is required. 3. Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated: A "Less Than Significant with Mitigation" is chosen when mitigation measures have been incorporated into the proposed project and reduced impacts to a less than significant level. 4. Potentially Significant Impact: A "Potentially Significant Impact" is chosen when the proposed project could have impacts that are considered significant. Additional analyses and possibly an EIR could be required to identify mitigation measures that could reduce these impacts to less than significant levels. VI. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST The environmental checklist presents results of the environmental evaluation for the proposed applications and those issue areas that would have either a significant impact, potentially significant impact, or no impact. Each response checked in the environmental checklist is discussed and supported with sufficient data and analysis as 4 necessary. As appropriate, each response discussion describes and identifies specific impacts anticipated with project implementation. VII. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project -specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project -specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off -site as well as on -site, cumulative as well as project -level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from "Earlier Analysis," as described in (5) below, may be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a. Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where it is available for review. b. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. C. Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site -specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 67 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a. The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b. the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significance. VIII. TIERED DOCUMENTS AND INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE Information, findings, and conclusions contained in this document may be based on incorporation by reference of tiered documentation, which are discussed in the following section. 1. Tiered Documents As permitted in Section 15152(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, information and discussions from other documents may be included into this document. Tiering is defined as follows: "Tiering refers to using the analysis of general matters contained in a broader EIR (such as the one prepared for a general plan or policy statement) with later EIRs and negative declarations on narrower projects; incorporating by reference the general discussions from the broader EIR; and concentrating the later EIR or negative declaration solely on the issues specific to the later project." Tiering also allows this document to comply with Section 15152(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, which discourages redundant analyses, as follows: "Agencies are encouraged to tier the environmental analyses which they prepare for separate but related projects including the general plans, zoning changes, and development projects. This approach can eliminate repetitive discussion of the same issues and focus the later EIR or negative declaration on the actual issues ripe for decision at each level of environmental review. Tiering is appropriate when the sequence of analysis is from an EIR prepared for a general plan, policy or program to an EIR or negative declaration for another plan, policy, or program of lesser scope, or to a site -specific EIR or negative declaration." Further, Section 15152(d) of the CEQA Guidelines states: "Where an EIR has been prepared and certified for a program, plan, policy, or ordinance consistent with the requirements of this section, any lead agency for a later project pursuant to or consistent with the program, plan, policy, or ordinance should limit the EIR or negative declaration on the later project to effects which: (1) Were not examined as significant effects on the environment in the prior EIR; or (2) Are susceptible to substantial reduction or avoidance by the choice of specific revisions in the project, by the imposition of conditions, or other means." 2.Incorporation By Reference Incorporation by reference is a procedure for reducing the size of EIRs/MND and is most appropriate for including long, descriptive, or technical materials that provide general background information, but do not contribute directly to the specific analysis of the project itself. This procedure is particularly useful when an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on a broadly -drafted EIR for its evaluation of cumulative impacts of 6 related projects (Las Virgenes Homeowners Federation v. County of Los Angeles- [1986, 177 Ca.3d 300]). If an EIR or Negative Declaration relies on information from a supporting study that is available to the public, the EIR or Negative Declaration cannot be deemed unsupported by evidence or analysis (San Francisco Ecology Center v. City and County of San Francisco [1975, 48 Ca.3d 584, 595]). This document incorporates by reference appropriate information from the "Final Environmental Impact Report and Environmental Assessment for the City of Temecula General Plan EIR. When an EIR or Negative Declaration incorporates a document by reference, the incorporation must comply with Section 15150 of the CEQA Guidelines as follows: • The incorporated document must be available to the public or be a matter of public record (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[a]). The General Plan EIR and documents incorporated by reference are available, along with this document, at the City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Ph. (951) 694-6400. • This document must be available for inspection by the public at an office of the lead agency (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[b]). These documents are available at the City of Temecula Community Development Department, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Ph. (951) 694- 6400. • These documents must summarize the portion of the document being incorporated by reference or briefly describe information that cannot be summarized. Furthermore, these documents must describe the relationship between the incorporated information and the analysis in the tiered documents (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[c]). As discussed above, the tiered EIRs address the entire project site and provide background and inventory information and data which apply to the project site. Incorporated information and/or data will be cited in the appropriate sections. • These documents must include the State identification number of the incorporated documents (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[d]). The State Clearinghouse Number for the City of Temecula General Plan EIR is SCH #2003061041. • The material to be incorporated in this document will include general background information (CEQA Guidelines Section 15150[f]). A complete list of documents incorporated by reference can be found in Section Two - V. rA SECTION TWO - CONTENTS OF AN INITIAL STUDY SECTION TWO — CONTENTS OF AN INITIAL STUDY I. PROJECT SUMMARY Project Title PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 Contact Person Nino Abad Phone: (951) 308-6385 Email: Nino.Abad(- TemeculaCA.gov Review Period Public Review from: April 28, 2021 to May 27, 2021 Project Location Friendship Park (Pala Community Park) 44900 Temecula Ln Temecula, CA 92592 Project Sponsor's Name and Address City of Temecula 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 General Plan Designation Open Space Zoning Open Space and Public Park Description of Project The erosion of the beds and banks are damaging and encroaching on the existing Friendship Park (Pala Community Park [Pala Park]). The City is proposing to let Temecula Creek meander naturally within the vicinity of Pala Park, however, the City is also proposing to protect Pala Park and the recreational fields from future erosion. The project consists of installing a sheet pile wall, approximately 427 feet in length, and an associated anchor system along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park. An impact pile driver will be used to install the sheet pile wall. The sheet pile wall will be driven to a maximum depth of 35-foot below ground surface (bgs). Wall anchors will be placed subsurface to hold the sheet pile wall in place in case Temecula Creek erodes all the way to the sheet pile wall. Any excess materials will be hauled off the site. The project does not propose to remove any trees as part of the project. The project will be constructed during non -nesting season to avoid any biological resource impacts. Staging of construction equipment will be outside of Temecula Creek and located within Pala Park. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The project location is within Friendship Park (Pala Community Park) and surrounded by residential communities. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Not Applicable. Required Environmental Factors Potentially Affected The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Agriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population and Housing Biological Resources Public Services Greenhouse Gas Emissions Recreation Cultural Resources Transportation and Traffic Geology and Soils Utilities and Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Mandatory Findings of Significance Hydrology and Water Quality x None Land Use and Planning Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a X significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. A4 AReviewedd Signature Luke Watson Director of Community Development 4/21 /2021 Date Date 10 m c L r ,40 , . . AK, IL .� � � � ' - - r ,� � 4 II. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST AND ANALYSIS 1. AESTHETICS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state X scenic highway? c Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. No Impact. The Project is not located near a scenic vista. The Project plans to install a sheet pile wall and associated anchors along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field of Pala Park, which will temporarily obstruct existing views during construction. Therefore, there is no impact to a scenic vista. 1.b. No Impact. The Project is not located within or adjacent to scenic resources. Additionally, according to the California Department of Transportation Scenic Highways Program Database, there are no designated state scenic highways located near the Project. Therefore, there is no impact to scenic resources. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact. The installation of the sheet pile protection wall and associated anchors in the park does not have the potential to degrade the visual character of the site. The sheet pile wall and anchors once installed will be installed below grade and will not be seen from the ground surface. Therefore, there is no impact to visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings. 1.d. No Impact. Construction of the Project will take place during daylight hours. Therefore, there is no impact by creating a new source of substantial lighting and glare. I 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state's inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring X Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson X Act contract? c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), X or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g)? d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non -forest X use? Comments: 2.a. No Impact. According to the State of California Department of Conservation Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP), the Project site is not located in an area designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. Therefore, there is no impact to farmland or agricultural resources. 2.b. No Impact. The project site is not zoned for agricultural use and is not under a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, there is no impact to land zoned for agricultural use or a Williamson Act contract. 2.c. No Impact. The Project location is located in land zoned for open space. The project will not conflict with existing zoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. 2.d. No Impact. The Project is not located in forest land. Therefore, there is no impact to forest land. 2.e. No Impact. The Project site is not on land designated for agricultural land use and will not result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use or forest land to non -forest use. 2 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality X standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X Comments: 3.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The City of Temecula is located in the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and USEPA Region 9. The following are applicable air quality plans: ➢ South Coast 2012 PM2.5 Plan and 2015 Supplement ➢ South Coast 1-Hour Ozone Attainment Demonstration ➢ South Coast PMio Redesignation Request and Maintenance Plan ➢ California State Implementation Plan for Carbon Monoxide in the South Coast Air Basin Emissions were calculated using the CalEEMod, Version 2016.3.2, a model used to quantify air quality impacts from land use projects located throughout California. The following table shows the daily emissions rates output for unmitigated construction during the summer compared to SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Pollutant NOx PMlo PM2.5 sox co Maximum Emissions rate (Ibs/day) 20.78 6.40a 3.80b 0.03c 13.57 Mass Daily Thresholds (Ibs/day) 100 150 55 150 550 Exceed Threshold? No No No No No a PMio total modeled emissions b PMz.s total modeled emissions c SOz modeled emissions During the construction phase, there will be temporary and small amounts of air pollutants emitted from construction equipment and excavation, but the effects will cease after construction is complete. The excavated soils will be wetted daily and earthwork will not occur when wind speeds are greater than 15 miles per hour. Project specifications will require the contractor to not violate air quality regulations, and compliance to those specifications will be monitored by the City on -site inspector. Therefore, there is a less than significant impact to applicable air quality plans. 91 3.b. Less Than Significant Impact. See Discussion above in 3.a. The project will not emit substantial amounts of pollutants and therefore, the project will not violate any air quality standards. 3.c. Less Than Significant Impact. See Discussion above in 3.a. This project will install a sheet pile protection wall and associated anchors that will not produce emissions after construction. The only emissions are from construction activities and do not exceed mass daily emission thresholds as detailed in the table above. The ozone precursors, NOX and CO, do not exceed the mass daily thresholds and therefore will not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non -attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact. See Discussion above in 3.a. The project will not emit substantial amounts of pollutants as the emissions do not exceed mass daily thresholds during construction and any emissions associated with post -construction, such as maintenance, will be less than emissions during construction. Therefore, the project will have a less than significant impact on sensitive receptors. 3.e. No Impact. The project area is open and nearest residences are approximately 175 feet away from the project site. Construction equipment used at the site has minimal emissions as compared to the mass daily thresholds and therefore will not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. 4 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, X policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of X Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Service? c Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) X through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the X use of native wildlife nursery sites? e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or X ordinance? f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved X local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Comments: 4.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The work area during construction consists of approximately 0.62 acres. The area consists of California rose briar patch (0.01 acre), developed (0.21 acre), disturbed (0.15 acre), ornamental (0.02 acre), ruderal (0.04 acre), and turf (0.19 acre). Chaparral sand -verbena and paniculate tarplant were observed in the survey area during the Special Status Plant Survey. The Chaparral sand -verbena species is listed in the California Rare Plant Rank CRPR) IBA: Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California and Elsewhere. Plants in this rank meet the definitions of the California Endangered Species Act of the California Fish and Game Code, and are eligible for state listing. The Paniculate tarplant has a CRPR of 4.2: Plant of Limited Distribution on a watch list. These species are located outside of the project construction area and therefore, will not be impacted. Prior to the initiation of the proposed project, the limits of disturbance (temporary impact area) shall be clearly defined and marked in the field with orange snow screen to prevent damage to adjacent vegetation and habitat. Exclusion fencing should be maintained until the completion of all construction activities. Employees shall be instructed that their activities are restricted to the construction areas. No erodible materials will be deposited into watercourses. Brush, loose soils, or other debris material will not be stockpiled within stream channels or on adjacent banks. To avoid attracting predators of the species of concern, the project site shall be kept as clean of debris as possible. All food related trash items shall be enclosed in sealed containers and regularly removed from the site(s). Construction employees shall strictly limit their activities, vehicles, equipment, and construction materials to the proposed project footprint and designated staging areas and routes of travel. The construction area(s) shall be the minimal area 5 necessary to complete the project and shall be specified in the construction plans. Access to sites will occur on pre- existing access routes to the greatest extent possible. 4.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The temporary impact area consists of riparian habitat. Eight focused surveys were conducted for the Least Bell's Vireo ( Vireo beiiii pusi//us), a federally and California State listed Endangered species, between April 2019 and August 2019 to determine the presence or absence of Least Bell's Vireo on the project site. One Least Bell's Vireo was identified in May 2019, however, the individual appeared to be unpaired and migrating west. Furthermore, these surveys identified one California Species of Special Concern (SSC), a yellow warbler (Setophaga petechia6. This individual was not detected in the survey area again, and therefore, was determined to be a migrant and not a breeding individual. Four separate surveys were conducted for the burrowing owl (Athene cunicu/aria) to identify the presence or absence of burrowing owls on the project site. The surveys were conducted in accordance with the Burrowing Owl Survey Instructions for the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) Area. The four surveys were conducted between April 2019 and August 2019, and found that there were no active burrowing owl burrows in the area; therefore, burrowing owls were presumed to be absent from the survey area. The removal of native vegetation shall be avoided and minimized to the maximum extent practicable. Temporary impacts shall be returned to pre-existing contours and revegetated with appropriate native species. 4.c. No Impact. According to the National Wetlands Inventory mapped by the USFWS, there is riverine wetland in the area within Temecula Creek outside of the project area and will not be impacted through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means. 4.d. Less Than Significant Impact. To ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code, all project activities shall be conducted during the non -nesting season for raptors (July 1 to January 31) and the non -nesting season for birds (September 16 to February 28) to avoid any potential disturbance of avian breeding activities. Therefore work will start effective September 16 and will finish prior to January 31. 4.e. No Impact. The Project will not conflict with the City's Heritage Tree Ordinance. 4.f. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project will have a less than significant impact on the MSHCP Criteria Cells #7445 and #7446, which would contribute toward conservation of Proposed Constrained Linkage 14 (Temecula and Pechanga Creeks) according to a Habitat Assessment performed on May 21, 2015. Recommendations provided from the Habitat Assessment, that will be implemented during construction, include conducting construction activities during non - nesting seasons for raptors (July 1 to January 31) and non -nesting season for birds (September 16 to February 28). A Joint Project Review was completed in March 2021, and required mitigation will be incorporated into the project design. Mitigation: BIO1: A condition shall be placed on grading permits requiring a qualified biologist to conduct a training session for project personnel prior to grading. The training shall include a description of the species of concern and its habitats, the general provisions of the Endangered Species Act (Act) and the MSHCP, the need to adhere to the provisions of the Act and the MSHCP, the penalties associated with violating the provisions of the Act, the general measures that are being implemented to conserve the species of concern as they relate to the project, and the access routes to and project site boundaries within which the project activities must be accomplished. BIO2: The qualified project biologist shall monitor construction activities for the duration of the project to ensure that practicable measures are being employed to avoid incidental disturbance of habitat and species of concern outside the project footprint. BIO3: The upstream and downstream limits of projects disturbance plus lateral limits of disturbance on either side of the stream shall be clearly defined and marked in the field and reviewed by the biologist prior to initiation of work. 6 BIO4: Due to the presence of potentially suitable habitat, a 30-day preconstruction survey for burrowing owls is required prior to initial ground -disturbing activities (e.g., vegetation clearing, clearing and grubbing, grading, tree removal, site watering, equipment staging) to ensure that no owls have colonized the site in the days or weeks preceding the ground disturbing activities. If burrowing owls have colonized the project site prior to the initiation of ground -disturbing activities, the project proponent will immediately inform the Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) and the Wildlife Agencies, and will need to coordinate further with RCA and the Wildlife Agencies, including the possibility of preparing a Burrowing Owl Protection and Relocation Plan, prior to initiating ground disturbance. If ground -disturbing activities occur, but the site is left undisturbed for more than 30 days, a pre -construction survey will again be necessary to ensure that burrowing owl have not colonized the site since it was last disturbed. If burrowing owl is found, the same coordination described above will be necessary. S. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a X historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an X archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? c Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of X formal cemeteries? Comments: 5.a. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The project area was assessed through the Cultural Resources Department of the Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians and was determined that there were no specific concerns regarding known cultural resources. The area is also within the territory of the Luiseno people and was determined to not be within Rincon's Historic Boundaries. The Pechanga Tribe states that the area is a culturally sensitive area to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians. However, with incorporation of Discussion noted below in 5.b. and 5.c., the impacts to historical resources will be reduced to less than significant. 5.b. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appear to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. A fully qualified specialist shall inspect the site, to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the work can be resumed. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, no further excavation or development shall take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been prepared and approved. A Pechanga Tribal monitor shall be present and have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. 5.c. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. Mitigation: CUL1: At least 30 days prior to start of any ground disturbing activity, the Pechanga Tribe should be contacted to coordinate with the Tribe to develop a Cultural Resources Treatment and Monitoring Agreement. The Agreement shall address the treatment of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal Monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors, including overtime and weekend rates, in addition to mileage reimbursement; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resource, sacred sites, and human remains discovered on the site. The Pechanga Tribal Monitor will have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps, in consultation with the Project archaeologist. Such evaluation shall include culturally appropriate temporary and permanent treatment pursuant to the Agreement, which may include 8 avoidance of cultural resources, in -place preservation and/or re -burial on the project property in an area that will not be subject to future disturbances for preservation in perpetuity. CUL2: Retention of a Qualified Archaeologist: Prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the City of Temecula shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior's Professional Qualification Standards for archaeology (Department of the Interior, 2012), to carry out all mitigation measures related to archaeological resources and to coordinate the archaeological program with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe). The Project archaeologist will have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribal Monitor. CUL3: If cultural resources are encountered during the course of ground disturbing activities, the City of Temecula shall cease any ground disturbing activities until it can be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and the Tribe. The qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe, shall assess the significance of discovered resources and shall take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Avoidance shall be the preferred manner of mitigation pursuant to California Public Resource Code § 21083.2(b). Preservation in place may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, complete avoidance, incorporating the resource into open space or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. In the event that preservation in place is demonstrated to be infeasible and data recovery through excavation is determined to be the only feasible mitigation option, a treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. The treatment plan shall also provide for the analysis, reporting, and curation/disposition of resources in accordance with the Treatment Agreement required in CUL1. CUL4: If human remains are uncovered during project construction, the City of Temecula shall immediately halt work and follow the procedures and protocols set forth in Section 15064.5(e) of the CEQA Guidelines, which require compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 (as amended by AB 2641). The applicant shall immediately contact the Riverside County Coroner to evaluate the remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are Native American and not subject to his or her authority, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) within 24 hours. The NAHC shall designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) for the remains, who shall have 48 hours from the time of being granted access to the site to provide recommendations to the landowner for the means of treating or disposing of, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and any associated grave goods. Until the landowner has discussed and conferred with the MLD, the landowner shall ensure that the immediate vicinity where the discovery occurred is not subject to further disturbances, is adequately protected according to generally accepted cultural and archaeological standards, and that further activities take into account the possibility of multiple burials. In the event that no MLD is identified, or if the MLD fails to make a recommendation for disposition, or if the landowner rejects the recommendation of the MLD and mediation with the NAHC fails to provide measures acceptable to the landowner, the landowner may reinter the remains and associated grave goods with appropriate dignity on the property in a location not subject to further disturbance. 7 6. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significant of a Tribal X Cultural Resource as defined in Section 21074? Comments: 6.a. Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. See Discussion in Section 5. The Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians, the Soboba Band of Luiseno, Morongo Band of Mission Indians, and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians have been consulted. They have preliminarily deferred to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for the cultural resources in the area. In a letter response from the Pechanga Tribe, the project area is located in a culturally sensitive area affiliated with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno and specific details will be provided during consultation in regards to potential cultural resources in the area. If cultural resources are discovered during construction, all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment. All cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, shall be relinquished to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Mitigation: TRI1: If cultural resources are discovered during construction, all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment. All cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, shall be relinquished to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition. Avoidance shall be the preferred manner of mitigation pursuant to California Public Resource Code § 21083.2(b). Preservation in place may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, complete avoidance, incorporating the resource into open space or deeding the site into a permanent conservation easement. In the event that preservation in place is demonstrated to be infeasible and data recovery through excavation is determined to be the only feasible mitigation option, a treatment plan shall be prepared and implemented by the qualified archaeologist, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe. The treatment plan shall also provide for the analysis, reporting, and address all archeological and cultural artifacts that area found on the project to be relinquished to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition, in accordance with the Treatment Agreement required in CUL1. 10 7. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource X or site or unique geologic feature? Comments: 7.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The project area is located in an area of low paleontological sensitivity according to the County of Riverside General Plan EIR. The project finds shall be consistent with any findings and incorporate actions discussed above in Sections 5 and 6. 11 S. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial X evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii Seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off -site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, X liquefaction or collapse? d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or X property? e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers X are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Comments: 8.a. No Impact. A geotechnical investigation was conducted and determined that the project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. Liquefaction is also not a concern because the sheet pile wall and associated anchors will not be supporting a human occupancy structure. Therefore, there is no substantial adverse effect involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, strong seismic ground shaking, liquefaction or landslides. 8.b. No Impact. The project is proposing to protect park facilities from natural occurring erosion in Temecula Creek. The project will not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil and there will be no negative impact. 8.c. No Impact. A geotechnical investigation was conducted and determined no features typically associated with landslides were noted during the investigation and would not cause landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. 8.d. No Impact. The geotechnical report does not note finding expansive soils at the project site, borings consisted mainly of sand. 8.e. No Impact. The project will not involve the use or will require the use of septic tanks or other alternative waste water disposal systems. 12 9. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, X that may have a significant impact on the environment? b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for X the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact. See discussion in Section 3. The Project will generate criteria pollutant emissions during construction, including CO2 and equivalents. Construction emissions are amortized over 30-years, and are not likely to result in substantive annual greenhouse gas emissions. Operations of the Project are minimal and are not expected to generate substantial levels of greenhouse gasses. Further analysis of this issue is not necessary and no mitigation measure would be required. 9.b. No Impact. The Project would not conflict with the State plan and policy AB 32 (California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006) quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 because the emissions from the project are temporary and minimal. 13 10. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transportation, use, or disposal of hazardous X materials? b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions X involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or X proposed school? d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to X the public or the environment? e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety X hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in X the project area? g Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed X with wildlands? Comments: 10.a. Less Than Significant. Construction activities associated with the Project are unlikely to involve the use of hazardous materials and the most likely sources of hazardous materials would be from vehicles and construction equipment at the site. Small amounts of hazardous materials, including solvents and lubricant, used to maintain construction equipment could occur during construction activities. These materials would be confined and located at the applicable staging areas for each site. Federal and state regulations that govern the storage of hazardous materials in containers (i.e., the types of materials and the size of packages containing hazardous materials), secondary confinement requirements, and the separation of containers holding hazardous materials, would limit the potential adverse impacts of contamination to a contained area. Therefore, the impacts are considered less than significant. 10.b. No Impact. The project will not create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment since there are no hazardous materials involved in the Project. 10.c No Impact. No Schools are found within a quarter mile of the project and no hazardous materials or substances will be emitted during the construction; therefore, there is no impact to the schools nearby. 14 10.d. No Impact. The project is not located on a list of hazardous materials site. 10.e. No Impact. The project is not located within two miles of an airport. 10.f. No Impact. The project is not located within the vicinity of a private air strip. 10.g. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project will not interfere with any emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. The local emergency agencies will be notified by the project prior to construction and will be able to accommodate alternate routes if necessary. 10.h. No Impact. The Project will not expose people or structures to significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires. 15 11. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X requirements or otherwise substantially degrade water quality? b Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing X nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation X on- or off -site? d Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a X manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site? e Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide X substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f Require the preparation of a project -specific WQMP? X g Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or X other flood hazard delineation map? h Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X i Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the X failure of a levee or dam? j Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X Comments: 11.a. No Impact. The project will not violate water quality standards, waste discharge requirements, or degrade water quality. The project will take place on the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park, just south of Temecula Creek. Best Management Practices (BMPs) will be implemented with respect to machinery and other contaminants. During the construction activity during expectant wet -weather conditions, silt fencing will be placed around the perimeter of the construction site to prevent sediment from construction related work from entering Temecula Creek. The minimum amount of BMPs to be used may include the use of gravel bags, plastic covers, and erosion control blankets/mats consistent with the project erosion control plan. Equipment storage, fueling, and staging areas shall be located on upland sites with minimal risks of direct drainage into riparian areas or other sensitive habitats. These designated areas shall be located in such a manner as to prevent any runoff from entering sensitive habitat. Necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent the release of cement or other toxic substances into surface waters. Project related spills of hazardous materials shall be reported to appropriate entities 16 including but not limited to applicable jurisdictional city, FWS, and CDFW, RWQCB and shall be cleaned up immediately and contaminated soils removed to approved disposal areas. Erodible fill material shall not be deposited into water courses. Brush, loose soils, or other similar debris material shall not be stockpiled within the stream channel or on its banks. 11.b. No Impact. The project will not deplete or interfere with groundwater recharge. 11.c. No Impact. The project will not alter the drainage pattern of the area in a way that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or off -site. 11.d. No Impact. The project will not substantially alter the drainage pattern of the area in a way that would result in flooding on or off -site. 11.e. No Impact. The project will not create or contribute runoff water to exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm drain systems or provide source of polluted runoff. 11.f. No Impact. The project will not require a WQMP as the project is not creating impervious areas as part of the project development. 11.g. No Impact. The project does not involve constructing housing and will not place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area. 11.h. No Impact. The project will place a sheet pile wall and associated anchors that will protect park facilities for any potential future erosion along Temecula Creek. The sheet pile and anchors will be buried and are not located aboveground that may impact a 100-year flood flow. 11.i. No Impact. The project does not propose any dam or associated structures to be constructed as part of the project, however, Vail Lake Dam is located upstream of the Project. The Dam safety is under the jurisdiction of the Division of Safety of Dams (DSOD) and appropriate inspection and mitigation measures will be required per Assembly Bill (AB) 1270. Therefore, the project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding. 11.j. No Impact. The project will not cause inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. Seiche will not be possible because Temecula Creek is not an enclosed waterbody. The City of Temecula is not located in an area subject to inundation by tsunamis, according to the Department of Conservation. The project is preventing the future potential of the Temecula Creek channel from encroaching onto park facilities, however, in a large flood event the area is currently subject to mudflows based on upstream watershed conditions. The project does not impede the channel flows and therefore any mudflows generated in the upstream watersheds will be routed in the channel as they would have during any event without the project. Therefore, the project will not have seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. 17 12. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal X program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X Comments: 12.a. No Impact. The project will not physically divide an established community. 12.b. No Impact. The Project will not conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation. 12.c. Less Than Significant Impact. See discussion in Section 4f. 18 13. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the X state? b Result in the loss of availability of a locally -important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, X specific plan or other land use plan? Comments: 13.a. No Impact. The project area is located in a Mineral Resource Zone where mineral deposits are likely to exist; however, the significance of the deposit is undetermined per the County of Riverside general plan. The project site is a riverine channel and procuring any mineral resources will be subject to all local and environmental regulations. The project does not impact the procurement of any available mineral resources and therefore, will not result in the loss of value of mineral resources to the region and the residents of the state. 13.b. No Impact. See discussion in 13.a. and there is no known locally -important mineral resource recovery site at the Project site identified by the general plan. 19 14. NOISE. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or X noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b Result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c Result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the X project? d Result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing X without the project? e If located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or X working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f If located within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to X excessive noise levels? Comments: 14.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The construction equipment will increase the ambient noise around the residential area. Due to the proximity of the residential communities, the contractor will be required to monitor noise levels and use construction muffler devices, sound blankets or other means to reduce to ambient noise levels. In Section 9.20.030 of the Temecula Municipal Code, capital improvement projects are exempt from the City noise ordinances and the increased noise levels are temporary and only during construction. The excessive noise is associated with the excavation phase with the driving of the sheet pile wall and construction of the associated anchors, during weekdays and between the hours of 7 am and 4:30 pm, and will cease after construction. Additionally, the project will have to comply with Section 9.20.060.D of the Temecula Municipal Code. The closest school is approximately 2,000 feet away and the construction noise will not significantly increase the ambient noise within the area. Pile drivers at 50 feet have a 101 decibel (dB) noise level and at a 2,000 feet of unrestricted distance would have a noise level of 69 dB. For comparison, according to a Decibel Level Comparison Chart from Yale Environmental Health and Safety Department, a chainsaw at 3 feet will have a noise level of 110 dB and a vacuum cleaner at 3 feet will have a noise level of 75 dB. 14.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project construction will create some groundborne vibrations from the pile driving activities as part of construction. Construction vibration levels were predicted using methodologies described in the CalTrans and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Noise and Vibration Guidance Manual. The Guidance Manual suggests a limit of 0.5 in/sec Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) for the type of equipment used in this project. The minimum distance for no impact from vibrations while using an impact pile driver is 52 feet, assuming the limit of 0.5 in/sec PPV is used. The nearest sensitive receptor is over 175 feet away. Therefore, groundborne vibrations generated by the construction of this project will not exceed vibration limits and no damage is expected with the equipment used on this project, as long as the minimum distance to buildings and structures is followed for no impact to occur. However, once construction is complete, all groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels will cease. 14.c. No Impact. The Project will temporarily cause an increase in noise levels during the construction phase and will not be permanent. 20 14.d. Less Than Significant Impact. See discussion above in parts 14a. and 14c. The construction contractor will have to monitor noise levels and use construction muffler devices, sound blankets or other means to reduce to ambient noise levels per City ordinances. 14.e. No Impact. The Project is not located in an area designated as airport land use. 14.f. No Impact. The Project is not located in the vicinity of a private airstrip. 21 15. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly X (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating X the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Comments: 15.a. No Impact. The Project will not induce substantial population growth in the area. 15.b. No Impact. The Project will not displace substantial number of existing housing. 15.c. No Impact. The Project will not displace substantial number of people. 22 16. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X Comments: 16.a. No Impact. No adverse impacts to these services are anticipated. During construction, portions of Pala Park may not be accessible, but that will be limited to the staging and construction area and will be temporary. 23 17. RECREATION. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical X deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse X physical effect on the environment? Comments: 17.a. No Impact. The project will not increase the use of existing neighborhood, regional parks, or other recreational facilities. 17.b. No Impact. The project does not include recreational facilities. 24 18. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non -motorized travel and relevant components of X the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths and mass transit? b Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county X congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in X substantial safety risks? d Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., X farm equipment)? e Result in inadequate emergency access? X f Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the X performance or safety of such facilities? Comments: 18.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The project will not conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system. The construction hours will strictly be followed by the contractor which is between 7:00 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Deviation from these hours will not be permitted without the prior consent of the City. Construction workers trips generated are minimal for the project with a vehicle miles travelled of approximately 100 miles per day. All transportation of construction equipment and materials will follow California Department of Transportation and the City guidelines for vehicles use. Therefore, this will be a less than significant impact to the circulation patterns within the project vicinity. 18.b. No Impact. The project will not conflict with the Riverside County Congestion Management Program. Per the Riverside County Congestion Management Program, the Level of Service for Temecula Parkway near the project vicinity is "B". The minimal amount of construction trips generated during traffic times is limited to the construction workers commuting to the site. The number of trips generated from the construction of the Project is limited and temporary, and will not adversely impact the traffic patterns. All equipment will be delivered at non -peak hours and per California Department of Transportation guidance. 18.c. No Impact. The project will not result in a change in air traffic patterns. 18.d. No Impact. The project will not substantially increase hazards due to a design feature. 25 18.e. No Impact. The project would not result in inadequate emergency access. The project does not anticipate closing any streets or intersections that may impact emergency access to the area. There are alternative routes that can be taken during any street closures. The Contractor will be required to notify all emergency agencies of planned closures. 18.f. No Impact. The project will not conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities. 26 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Issues and Supporting Information Sources Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the X construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of X which could cause significant environmental effects? d Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded X entitlements needed? e Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate X capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? f Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? X g Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 19.a. No Impact. The project is not a wastewater treatment type project and therefore, associated requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board will not be exceeded. 19.b. No Impact. The project will not result in the construction of a new water or wastewater treatment facility. 19.c. No Impact. The project will not result in the construction of new stormwater drainage facilities. 19.d. No Impact. The project will not increase the use of water in the area. The existing site is within Temecula Creek and any irrigation necessary for the park will be an ongoing use. 19.e. No Impact. The project will not require the use of wastewater. 19.f. No Impact. The project will excavate soil along the embankment and reuse it as fill and any remaining soil will be properly disposed of. The contractor may use the soil for disposal and the soils can be used as daily cover at the landfill, or the soils may be used as fill for other projects in the area. 19.g. No Impact. The project will comply with federal, state, and local statutes relating to solid waste. 27 20. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Less Than Potentially Significant With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Issues and Supporting Information Sources Impact Incorporated Impact Impact a Have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the X number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b Have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in X connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c Have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 20.a. No Impact. The Project is not anticipated to affect the quality of the environment, habitat, fish, wildlife, and plant populations. 20.b. No Impact. The Project does not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable. 20.c. No Impact. The Project is not anticipated to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings. Note: Authority cited: Sections 21083 and 21083.05, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 65088.4, Gov. Code; Sections 21080(c), 21080.1, 21080.3, 21083, 21083.05, 21083.3, 21093, 21094, 21095, and 21151, Public Resources Code; Sundstiamv. CountyofMendocrno,(1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296; Leonoffv. Monterey8oardof&pervisors, (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 1337; Eureka Citizens forResponsi% Govt. v. Cily of Eureka (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 357; Protect the HistoricAmadorWaterways v. AmadorWaterAgency (2004) 116 Cal.App.4th at 1109; San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v.CilyandCountyofSan Francisco(2002) 102Ca1.App.4th656. 28 III. EARLIER ANALYSIS Earlier analysis may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR, or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration pursuant to Section 15063(c)(3)(D) of the CEQA guidelines. In this case a discussion should identify the following on attached sheets. 1. Earlier Analysis Used. 2. Impacts adequately addressed. 3. Mitigation measures. Not Applicable. IV. PERSONS AND ORGANZIATIONS CONSULTED Luke Watson, Director of Community Development Stuart Fisk, AICP, Senior Planner Morongo Band of Mission Indians Pechanga Cultural Resources Department Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians V. REFERENCES 1. City of Temecula General Plan, April 2005 2. City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report 3. South Coast Air Quality Management District CEQA Air Quality Handbook 4. City of Temecula Environmental Review Procedures Handbook (2009) 5. Consultation with Rincon Band of Indians and Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians 6. Habitat Assessment for Pala Park Stabilization Project: Geotechnical Exploration, BonTerra Psomas 7. California Native Plant Society: Ranking System 8. Department of Conservation: Important Farmland Finder 9. Department of Conservation: California Geological Survey Information Warehouse: Tsunami 10. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper 11. City of Temecula Municipal Code: Title 8. Chapter 8.48 and Title 9 Chapter 9.20 12. Regional Conservation Authority Western Riverside County: Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan 13. Geotechnical Investigation, Flood Control Channel Slope Stabilization Pala Community Park, CTE, South, Inc. 14. South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality Significance Thresholds 15. County of Riverside Environmental Impact Report No. 521, Section 4.9 Cultural and Paleontological Resources and Section 4.14 Mineral Resources 16. 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program 17. Attenuation of ground vibrations from pile driving - Ground Engineering 18. City of Temecula Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Concept for Pala Park 19. Yale Environmental Health and Safety: Decibel Level Comparison Chart 20. Focused Presence/Absence Surveys for Burrowing Owl for Pala Park Stabilization Project, Psomas 21. Focused Presence/Absence Surveys for Least Bell's Vireo for Pala Park Stabilization Project, Psomas 29 22. Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Consistency Analysis, Psomas 23. Geotechnical Engineering Report, Temecula Flood Control Channel Recon and Repair, Terracon Consultants, Inc. 24. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, Federal Transit Administration 25. Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority 30 c 0 fa v 'L rca 0_ > 0 U c O u 0 U Q ro r0 ro ro 0) '— 7 0 0 u u u 'L O , E E E E � 00 H H OH a) O O O O U U U U ro ro c O F, N a) N N E E E O 0 ~ H H CLn 0 0 0 0 LLI � � U U U U 0) C: c O E 0 0 (a U C) L 4-1 yJ C yJ CC O a) "O O ro Ln O_ +' ro O_ � fu O cn r6 _N L 01 O _N L L O1 O7 '> %-� '> O � }� L O "0 C L L . O C L O C L a V ro ro 0 a $ rho a 0 0 ro ro ro ro aa) (U (U 0 E E E E c E H (U (U a� Q M- o 0 0 0 U U U U C o -0 L N N a� o N -O w w rn a� a� w a� c L v w -O C w 4' L cn o 'CM 4- ro -0 � 0 to Qi E a� t -O ai C t _� i` ro o, C C o cm a- .fu +-+ L a- �+ +-i aU o r0 a-J +'' fo 4- -0 w i 4 � }' �+ a� 4 + � ro 41 rU -O 3 C }, C 70 0 o� 0 a o c '� a 0 0 o � -0 Q v `—° 0 a M o ro o +� ca 0 N c ro r6 U cn 0 0 O � � 4' rn +� E 0 C cn a) 0 a) +- L 0 0) 0) 0) O O+ rn 0 Z-0 0= C C (n O Q a) a) cn 4- � a) 0 3 E 4� +� c a) O vn j 3 O 0 O a Ln C w i O O 0 -0 m F (a m .CL o LLJ (_n W W 7 C a) 7 C o rUU 0) U O "0 L N 3� O +_+ C m C 0) U > +� � cn OU O 0 O c U O> w ro p ` r — 01 C ,� O N a) a) Ul)C ,4— L L � (6 3 L s1 rU C C+ O U .L a-1 -0 '� a a Q a � C E O� 4 � V rn N {OJ ���� r� � N L -0 C C (V 0 a) i `i +L-� L ro C:w -O U �-, U �J •^ L U C E L c (B O %� O C 6 .o a) L a) O C L (O � Z m ro L ro U +-+ L �%tr N i a 0 cn O m +�-' o (n U r0 L + O _0 p O L U 0 (/) N^ .O (U C (O _ U " "0 U O 0+ 0_ fo i O C +� 0 c L 0 0 c E ro 0 o« 0 ro +� C 0 _ o m N +� 01 0) 0 a -0 c Q 0) a) a U) cr fo N O C E, fo �J _0 `~ O+ 0 N> .0 i O C ,O O> `_� a) L L C O 4- L O 0 'L —_ ) L o O o U O— a 3 _� O U -0 > 0 0 O� ro + .� a) Q Q o L a� Q(n U -0 O 0_ Q �J 0 O C a) ~ p+ O a) C� O_ O 0 p inC 0_ C U 0- Ol U Ol +� Ql 0 v) M �O c (�6 Q to a +� + E f6 _0 Q +� 0 0 "0 V a) � C 01 i C O N C a) .� U '� N N N N 0} N W N Y O O ro O 'E O 0 a) C a) ow +� 00 +� .0 a) O O O —_ O ro U ro 0 '^ O M O + +� fp a) L r6 O O O 'D U 4 J r6 rn m L 0) 0 ,� 0_ a) 0_ a) U rn o, cn c Q VI w ro o a� 0_ rn L 0. L L 0. 0_ i--i m rn +� O 0_ +� C ro 0_ m E E — = v, E m rn 0. 3 O 0 =0 v 0 fu \ (U @ u / ¥ k u a : % u 2 \ E # / / / y / U a U 2 \ F u § § E e / /CL y � U E 0 E % � fo 2 \ / fu ru U) » - 0)e § 0 k k k m 4-0 � f / u / \ E o ƒ � o ƒ k � O t>��> c o 0 3 _ W$±®� o G c t m I- a U) o m 70> D o fa-04- o=� e 6 0 Ln-0 7® 0 / 7 $ 7 / / / 0� 7 / % ® 2 ° 2 C t / / 2 2 / § § a 3 5 R / 6 2 ±_ 2 0 e E 2 £ 5 2 m 2 § E/ j 2 5 # 7 t o m o w E' # �. u Ln u> E u o c 5 cr 0 0 5 a\ E@ 0 ƒ 5± M 2 c \ c o< 7 : 0) o \ _ @/ Ln 0 2 c/ o o m Ln o 2 r- g -0 . t o E o� o-�-0 \ 2 0 2 M/ -' e / o e ® / E 2 2 2 f/ $ O o o o m \/)/� .= o m R t 2 G E t. 0 m a o /#m �- 7 3 - a ro-0 o = o C 2 �>,# �� a 2 -@ E C '§ fO � � �= p o � . � _ � 0§ m� 0) o M 4 E . = ®£ m 0 � o ». 2®� . � t ra G$ �/ 2 2 2 u 2 :: -0� c 6%%± 7 k o= 2 §_ -0» D o m L W es_ o u m g E� $ £ g o m » f- E/§ E + 2 2 # 5 5§ E m® 7 ƒ J J / o & 0 / % § @ 5 / / / / £ � : Ln . k c£� m U 2 E c 2 g 6 Gƒ 2°§ o 5 0 m o q - t Ln _0 o« 0) 7 /ƒ � / > o / m t£ fu u \ 2 0-0\ 2/ƒ u U) m- % E m / � u 7 E o E \ o E§ 2 a u 2 =_ ol / ¢ 0 2 E u C« � w e 0)#- 0) e -0 (u _ 2 7 E E E E 5 �' 5- 2 0 / a) $ U U% 2£/ 0 m � U) m- § e G e @ c o § CL E S/ a% � m 2 0- � >� y o m f 3 - ° I�� m e� E 3 o E t f ° s\ \? 2 B t 2 E »°_/ G o 5 0ƒ)ƒ/\%$ 4 u 0- m u e£ e<< 7<�(0 c m= 0- c� a£ 4 U m d- u Q y LA E-0-0-0 0 fu \ ƒ� @ u / ¥ k 2 a : % u 2 \ E # / / W 0 / 2 R U a U 2 \ F g § E e § / /CL ¥ � U E 0 E % � fo 2 \fLn e » - c § 0 k k m k - 4-0 4-1 f u / \ E o ƒ 0- o ƒ k � O c c » g o 2 0 ®5 0 » t 4 f o M± 7 ® y y t\ 2 2 E 2 t 2/ = o § § § e �C 2 o E _ § 2 o e @ @ 5 2 \ k ®3 4-1 § E- -0 E- 2 + »� E 5 m� c 2 E 2 ¥ m- °- E ) c 0 O] 2 d\° 2 3 \ 3 §f - 72-2c3 $® k 2 Q u o E E 3/ O t a o a m t a). J= t s o §@ o S 0)¥ « • o m � £° u= $ O o m 2� E 2 2 7 E% ° 0/ 4_ t E o S# B % G" $°@ . m E o 0 o e : 5 2 = m o m 5 » o �' m e $ o _: v k M U ® d& y£ a W£= o- U® § f F k e E 2 2 E > °- 8:® M M M E± 2� o 0 > 2 �� 2 t\� 0)\ S E m m o > % 0 o £ 2\ o f @£ ± ® e � t 2 2 � o c _± 7/ d Ln= m om 2 e\ \ f& 70' % o 0 0 # o: 2 - t � o o M o u o 0 2§ t • 0) - _ ° 2 S m ¥ fa� c : : = k a 2 @ 0 -0 © ): £ / f / / c $ ƒ E s J §� ) -0 0� � / = k 0 C k m E §± / J �ƒ \ 2® \ 2 k/ f ' § \ E E 2 E 4 & ± » o q 7 . . / $ m 7 t ± 5 0' £ °' � o: t W c 2-0 2 ° 2 2 _ ° o m 2= » \ ra 0-/ o - o fu / m / ƒ 5 t = g 2¥ o o q% p/%%/ £ 'n o % E f/ m E o $/ S 0 f m q E G E §® 0 0 0 f // U§ v f v o£ƒ f u o 3/ U I$£ e$//$// e§ e\/< o¢ m m 5 y y[ m u 7 3�» 0 fu \ (U @ u / ¥ k fu : % u -0 / \ E % / / / / U 2 � 0 _ U I U \F / E § e 0 0) OL / ¥ � U E 0 E \ � � § 7 / Ln 2 - 2 §0% @ 3 k M 4-0 oa 2 4-1 f u & E E m 0- ƒ / ƒ k � O °# ro £ G a) -0 fo G° a: E 2 a 5 2 e 2 y 2 a a b U 2 o& o o� �££@ C o 2-0' m= 2 E o t y o £• m E u 2 0 @ » / • / / £ 3 / § a ^ 2 k • 7 § c- 2 g _ = 2 o _ / ± g \ w $ § / / u § E g ƒ » / E 3 ( ± # ° § » -0 e # c 2 2 U k ' a e o R '0 ± � \ § \ - c � 2 E \ / @ o )� 0- -0 @ / t 7 : // 0/¥ § 2 C- g § r k c- S § C C 4-1 E±// 2 2 $_ 2 k 2 S J e£± U k% \ 2 o o m R e o a $ 0 E 3 S O > uƒ' ° a u\)\ t f E G 2/ / 2 2 o" 2 § 2 �. 7 u m ) � 0 tD� o© o 0/ m c£ f W m 4 £ 2 2 2 ru e m o o � c fo t� O 2 C °= 2 0 / 2 0 ± $ / £ £ M R / E E > / £ \ '- � 7 \ S \ _ 5 » > fo- ® 2 0 o o » 2 m B u u m E \ y 3 2 u 3 W c u o \ fo 4- o = 2®£ o 7 o -& m o o m 6� o m E ' m[ 5. 7 (u _0» a 0 2 -�/ 5 a- £ 2 0 £ E> o o _ M o E £ e ° c o ®� = c u m= 2 L® 2 � 0=> o o o o u 2= _ 2 u �� G m o- 2 f E S /= E q § t §/ t - Q 2 E°± m o o m « y § J 2 $ c �� \ 2 q\ S= o=@ t S o' i m o E 2 f=/ E -0 (Ug a m u E o \ E f e 2 m >� 0 §: � 2/-- E 0- E S .-® t E-o 0-2-i u/%ƒ 7 0@ 7 u -0 ._ u_0 o E Lon m :'- am) u E 0 0)$ ) %£ o o c CL fc n/ _ U _� u = o=. u�>� o u o e m c a) E-a m �� E e c a 2 m M� G u Ln_0 M fu< o� I M u M o: m_0 7 w 0 fu � \ d� �d jr, ¥ k 2 fa 0 c A u 0 7 uj E # 0 $ 0 k \ �A �0 t�2 a - u § E e 0 m LU O E 0 E1 fo 0 fu e fu _ 0)" gof kut k0 ru \§ & § E /mot A 7 « 0 0 ± f $ \ C ± ± t f > u m t -0 m * $ .5 0 -o 2 & # 2 2 2 % ± ± / = m 2 u 0 // � �_ � � » I m M-0 m c> E c � o m a 2 c ® � � 4- / O 0° E °° d % 2 § m@ E o m � E 2 k-0 o' 2 f 2 E t �. - u c m fa 0-, ƒ� c t m £ 2 U u 0 I e 2 s 0 0 c o °� § - G @ L Ln [ 2 : 2 £ § « o E o • 2 -0 J ± § \ u 7 0 ° § u 3 y E e � + ' k �� M E W M� / q .- � ± / 0 k / 0 § B ro � \ / A ®� k) S?§ // > e� m t E m 2 �� ) E 8 t u» 2 / o : t e - m[ E m E/ƒ a o f 2 t m d E° - 2 a f e fo � e _£ n / 5 ® $ ° < o � ocn / -C � \ W 2 / _ g 2@ ® E§.2 fƒ§ w p t$ ƒ§ / m m e.- 2 e fu / Ln G e®> b / o 7 2 2£ \ c u a E 3 q u 9\ 0 f$ \£% 0 2 m u 0- - b 2 2 b t o E m 2 g o u- 2 2 � u o f u> 0 � c%-r a)� o& 2£ � 2 0 2' ®\ 3/ $ f {/§ 2 0_ £ E 2-0- g 2 2 r 2>1 f¥ c o $§ f m§ k V) 5 £ .-/ ru m 7 f -: t § 2 f 7 C� o t g 0 f e G 2 c 2< / m \ 0 7 / E 6 a = e E u- k- 7 t a 7� Ln c /§% 2 L 0� 2= R 0 E e$ o u o u E p c �: o� 2 t 0 m U w t m Q u@ U</ o U U e L U< 2 2/ e 5 7 e= S£ 2) 2 \ m 2 k$ c 0 U U ro fZ \L / 0 U C: O 0 U Q fB _ fo 01 _ C p U -0 O C E .0 C O O � 01 O o fo U C N U O a U 4� c E -:2 N U O O Q C O W a..l U 0) c c O fu O X f N fa N C L 0) L fo f0 O f0 f �CC C ~ O N 0- C)-O E U v 0 O fll O C -W� O t O C 1 O 0 C •^ > O 3 fo E � C: '� �.' fo�� 3 Ln fo U a-1 — +, C 7 N fu a--+ -p 0 p E C •i 0 U _0 N _ N +a) fu Ln 7 fn O U fo 0 L fn fo d 00 � � L O a-.+ 4 � N C H fa E 'p1 f0 L O U 0 N U f0 C N C O fn ~ Q E q(CO a--+ M" W a- fn a--' U O (O +� 0) N � 0 Q W N u L N C U 0 -O C OU fll O N Q p E C N _� C O 'fa p LO Q O In 0 4� fn > -p m 0) f0 C w0 N +� O L L E 0 0 f6 fo (0 ( a� L C 0 (6 (" ) V W 7 -0 fo0 2 0 U O +J U— fin V +� •� V o U o O fm C W 0 0 i a +7 2 L Q L C �r _c E u 0 o a N J--, Q' �, rya Q C: C +� •fn } C ro O a� C: N C z 0 0, o O (6 fn o o Q � fu a� fu o O �' a v f6 � +' N U L — v fll a� ai U C C f0 _0 L C fa -0 o w� a�-1 0_ O C U a�-1 f� �O Q U O i 0 .0 > 0 Q Q~ Q 0 •m •� 0) +� L V L }' }' •7 " C N Y (6 — M Q U p 0 C fu _0 f0 Q N +�-� _ fo 0 0 4O C O fL N~ ra m fo 0 4b O O L � 0- C p fn O O O 0 f U fo C pl c c f(_n M V (�6 '� a� N _ C f�0 fop 0 m c0 U 0 fL C C OJ C 6 _ 7 Ol L L Q i ,C N O L L a0 O f6 LO �O ra fu f O L E 6 N "O �.'i O N E Q 7 E N C >� a--+ C fn a fli fli Q fa a. I --I :..) 4- U -6 fQ D Q O C pL (n O fn (� c0 G'0 a -A E E �J C fa � fa O: LaL r; 0 a� .� �J a c l� �! .� � fo L > w .Q/i Q Q O a. Q a. m O fv U L }' VI fa fll Q-0 a� x 0) >, p w Q-0 U § fu � \ d� �d jr, ¥ k E / ? \ k Ln � t a— E ƒ " § k ? E � E E p § \ k k § �2 / � k J kfo = -0 k / 2 41 m J E o° " f ®2 / g O f e� R 7 ��\cufuk� \ 2 � E 2 . m o � 2 � � 0 2 _ / # 6 3 2 U 0a) £ e 0 / 4-1 G ± k 4-1 m § � £ 7 / f f \ / 2 0 Fa -0 cu - e E� / S t w 2 2 2 § m / § / k k \ ° ° E e e / 5 m m e cl m a SECTION THREE - NOTICES SECTION 3. — NOTICES I. Notice of Intent (NOI) to Adopt a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration II. Notice of Determination (NOD) for a Negative Declaration or Mitigated Negative Declaration City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Intent to Adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration PROJECT: PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair APPLICANT: City of Temecula (Nino Abad, P.E., Project Manager) LOCATION: Friendship Park (Pala Community Park), 44900 Temecula Lane, City of Temecula, County of Riverside DESCRIPTION: The erosion of the beds and banks are damaging and encroaching on the existing Friendship Park (Pala Community Park [Pala Park]). The City is proposing to let Temecula Creek meander naturally within the vicinity of Pala Park, however, the City is also proposing to protect Pala Park and the recreational fields from future erosion. The project consists of installing a sheet pile wall, approximately 427 feet in length, and an associated anchor system along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park. An impact pile driver will be used to install the sheet pile wall. The sheet pile wall will be driven to a maximum depth of 35-foot below ground surface (bgs). Wall anchors will be placed subsurface to hold the sheet pile wall in place in case Temecula Creek erodes all the way to the sheet pile wall. Any excess materials will be hauled off the site. The project does not propose to remove any trees as part of the project. The project will be constructed during non -nesting season to avoid any biological resource impacts. Staging of construction equipment will be outside of Temecula Creek and located within Pala Park. The City of Temecula intends to adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for the project described above. This notice is made pursuant to Section 15072 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Based upon the information contained in the Initial Environmental Study and pursuant to the requirements of CEQA; it has been determined that this project as proposed, revised or mitigated will not have a significant impact upon the environment. As a result, the City Council intends to adopt a MND for this project. The mitigation measures required to reduce or mitigate the impacts of this project on the environment are included in the project design and/or the Mitigation Monitoring Program and will be included as part of the MND for this project. As required by Section 15073 of CEQA, the public review and commenting period for this proposed MND is April 28, 2021 to May 27, 2021. Written comments and responses to this notice should be addressed to the contact person listed below at the following address: City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590. After the public comment period is over and comments have been addressed, the project and MND is up for approval through the City Council at a Council meeting. City staff would then file the Notice of Determination. All are invited to comment on the proposed MND. Written comments must be received by the City by 5:00 p.m. on May 27, 2021. Comments that are postmarked on or before this date will also be accepted. The document can be reviewed at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590; Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, 30600 Pauba Road, Temecula, CA 92592; Temecula Chamber of Commerce, 26790 Ynez Court, Ste. A, Temecula, CA 92591; and the City of Temecula Website: http://TemeculaCA.gov. The public notice of the intent to adopt this Mitigated Negative Declaration is provided through: ®The Local Newspaper (San Diego Union -Tribune) ®Posting the Site ❑Notice to Adjacent Property Owners If you need additional informaytion or have any questions concerning this project, please contact the Project Manag r Nino Abad f (951) 308-6385 or Nino.Abad@TemeculaCA.gov 2.0 z Luke Watson (Date Director of Community Development Appendix C Notice of Completion & Environmental Document Transmittal Mail to: State Clearinghouse, P.O. Box 3044, Sacramento, CA 95812-3044 (916) 445-0613 SCH # 2021040626 For Hand Delivery/Street Address: 1400 Tenth Street, Sacramento, CA 95914 Project Title: PW11-10 Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Lead Agency: City of Temecula Contact Person: Nino Abad Mailing Address: 41000 Main Street Phone: (951) 694-6400 City: Temecula Zip: County: Riverside - ------------ Y-------y---------------------- Project Location: County: Riverside City/Nearest /Nearest Community: Temecula Cross Streets: Temecula Lane and Canterfield Drive Zip Code: 92592 Longitude/Latitude (degrees, minutes and seconds): 33 28 ' 17.8 " N / 117 ° 07 ' 03.4 " W Total Acres: 0.62 Assessor's Parcel No.: 961-450-001, 961-450-002 Section: 19 and 20 T p.: 8S Range: 2W Base: Within 2 Miles: State Hwy #: Route 79. Highway 15 Waterways: Temecula Creek Airports: Railways: Schools: Erie Stanley Gardner Middle School ..--------,..--------------------------------. Document Type: CEQA: ❑ NOP ❑ Draft EIR NEPA: ❑ NOI Other: ❑ Joint Document ❑ Early Cons ❑ Supplement/Subsequent EIR ❑ EA ❑ Final Document ❑ Neg Dec (Prior SCH No.) ❑ Draft EIS ❑ Other: ❑■ Mit Neg Dec Other: ❑ FONSI ---------------------------------------------- Local Action Type: ❑ General Plan Update ❑ Specific Plan ❑ Rezone ❑ Annexation ❑ General Plan Amendment ❑ Master Plan ❑ Prezone ❑ Redevelopment ❑ General Plan Element ❑ Planned Unit Development ❑ Use Permit ❑ Coastal Permit ❑ Community Plan IN Site Plan ❑ Land Division (Subdivision, etc.) ❑ Other: -------------------------...--------------------., --- Development Type: ❑ Residential: Units _ ❑ Office. Sq.ft. _ ❑ Commercial: Sq.ft. _ ❑ Industrial: Sq.ft. ❑ Educational: ❑ Recreational: ❑ Water Facilities:Type Acres Acres Acres Acres -------------------- Project Issues Discussed in Document: Employees ❑ Transportation: Type Employees ❑ Mining: Mineral Employees ❑ Power: Type ❑ Waste Treatment: Type ❑ Hazardous Waste:Type MGD [1110 Other: Underground sheet pile wall MW_ MGD ❑ Aesthetic/Visual ❑ Fiscal ❑ Recreation/Parks 0 Vegetation ❑ Agricultural Land ❑ Flood Plain/Flooding ❑ Schools/Universities ❑ Water Quality ❑ Air Quality ❑ Forest Land/Fire Hazard ❑ Septic Systems ❑ Water Supply/Groundwater ❑ Archeological/Historical ❑ Geologic/Seismic ❑ Sewer Capacity ❑ Wetland/Riparian ❑■ Biological Resources ❑ Minerals ❑ Soil Erosion/Compaction/Grading ❑ Growth Inducement ❑ Coastal Zone ❑■ Noise ❑ Solid Waste ❑ Land Use ❑ Drainage/Absorption ❑ Population/Housing Balance ❑ Toxic/Hazardous ❑ Cumulative Effects ❑ Economic/Jobs ❑ Public Services/Facilities ❑ Traffic/Circulation ❑ Other: - Present Land Use/Zoning/General Plan Designation: Open space (Park) ----------------------- Project Description: (please use a separate page if necessary) The erosion of the beds and banks are damaging and encroaching on the existing Friendship Park (Pala Community Park [Pala Park]). The City is proposing to let Temecula Creek meander naturally within the vicinity of Pala Park, however, the City is also proposing to protect Pala Park and the recreational fields from future erosion. The project consists of installing a sheet pile wall, approximately 427 feet in length, and an associated anchor system along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park. An impact pile driver will be used to install the sheet pile wall. The sheet pile wall will be driven to a maximum depth of 35-foot below ground surface (bgs). Wall anchors will be placed subsurface to hold the sheet pile wall in place in case Temecula Creek erodes all the way to the sheet pile wall. Any excess materials will be hauled off the site. The project does not propose to remove any trees as part of the project. The project will be constructed during non -nesting season to avoid any biological resource impacts. Staging of construction equipment will be outside of Temecula Creek and located within Pala Park. Note: The State Clearinghouse will assign identification numbers for all new projects. If a SCH number already exists for a project (e.g. Notice of Preparation or previous draft document) please fill in. Revised 2010 Reviewing Agencies Checklist Lead Agencies may recommend State Clearinghouse distribution by marking agencies below with and "X". If you have already sent your document to the agency please denote that with an "S". X Air Resources Board Boating & Waterways, Department of California Emergency Management Agency California Highway Patrol X Caltrans District # 8 Caltrans Division of Aeronautics Caltrans Planning Central Valley Flood Protection Board Coachella Valley Mtns. Conservancy Coastal Commission Colorado River Board Conservation, Department of Corrections, Department of Delta Protection Commission Education, Department of Energy Commission X Fish & Game Region # 6 Food & Agriculture, Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Department of General Services, Department of Health Services, Department of Housing & Community Development X Native American Heritage Commission Local Public Review Period (to be filled in by lead agency) Starting Date April 28, 2021 Lead Agency (Complete if applicable): Consulting Firm: CWE Address: 1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 City/State/Zip: Fullerton /CA 92831 Contact: Vik Bapna Phone: (714) 526-7500 Office of Historic Preservation Office of Public School Construction X Parks & Recreation, Department of Pesticide Regulation, Department of Public Utilities Commission X Regional WQCB # 6 Resources Agency Resources Recycling and Recovery, Department of S.F. Bay Conservation & Development Comm. San Gabriel & Lower L.A. Rivers & Mtns. Conservancy San Joaquin River Conservancy Santa Monica Mtns. Conservancy State Lands Commission SWRCB: Clean Water Grants SWRCB: Water Quality SWRCB: Water Rights Tahoe Regional Planning Agency Toxic Substances Control, Department of Water Resources, Department of Other: Other: Ending Date May 27, 2021 Applicant: Address: _ City/State/Zip: Phone: ---------------------_. - ----- - -1------------------------ Signature of Lead Agency Representative: Date: 4/27/2021 Authority cited: Section 21083, Public Resources Code. Reference: Section 21161, Public Resources Code. Revised 2010 SECTION FOUR - COMMENTS RECEIVED AND RESPONSE TO COMMENTS l iu ou Baud of Luisefto Indian CULTURAL RAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Cm,e Ga4;em of Center Lane I Valle} Comer I CA 92032 C76a) 749-1051 1 Fay C76a) 74M901 I rmcon-nsn.gw Mzy'12, 2021 Sent 317 ema>J: I uLbn, Sd a Temeculry(_A. gav CLh-of Temecula CGnmxmihf Dev-el Phrming DS4Zaon Mr. Nm Abad 41000 Main Sheet Tee4 CA 9259-0 Re; n-1I-10 Fl*od Control Chanel Reconstirvcbam and Repair Dear Mr. Aha& EL Ida This letbu is mitten on bLbalf of the Rihccea Band of L,nse& Indus �-Rmcaa Band'" or "B.-a3&)- a fedmally recagnized Indian Time and sosermgm gmanmmmL Thank you far pra-i;aduLg us vnth me Noboe of to Adapt a 11 ibgated Negative T1rwluatio O&M) far the ab we reEmenced pa,:Oct. The id-atif; Ed locatim is within the Taritory of'the T xLsx m peopk and is also with Rm n's spe6$c aea of Flistmc Lnteimt. In 2015: the Band chase nat to engage in awm wonwig fhe City and tleafoe haz as comnmnL ruin v the N[R D_ We reumumiend nmrk mg claseFymththe Pechauga Band Dr1An --mw Iacians as #may have may halo pubma t infwmetian_ If you ha4e adEb al que,t<aas air oDncE=, please & na# hate too- *our offute at war m=meuce of (7 297-M35_ Thank you far the ogpoatunity to pruket and pare = cultural assets. &130 1y: Cheryl Madrigal III H:�+ra;o PresenatiomB'itr CuIMM1 R EDMrCS5 Niau_ager Bo Iti'la etti Tisbmall Turner Laurie E. CDazalez Jahn Constantino Joseph Linton rld� V ices Chi- -council 3 5abg cbmx l hi®hQ C maml MM!bw J}5S{R',1 E- UF11TY €'.eireral ManWr id BnghK*r 0 RiVL'RSIDE CDUNTY PLDDDCONTROL AND W ATER GOKSERVATION DIM—Rlt_:1' City Df Temecula tommurdty Development D PUAMOhl 4101II] Mahn Street TrmecuLa CA 92590 AoWion_ Nina Ahead May 21, 2021 1995 M?4RKIEr S'ii+ 1-','r KiYERSIDF,CA Mw 951.955.1200 Z 17f#QAW FAx ww-ffdmd,M Re: PW L i-i-0 Flowod Ckmkoll Chatirtel R cst,oWa on and Repair ;&3RZN The RivErside County 11knd Control. and W ter CnFoci5+at-ton L)isLrid (Oisirict) &es not normally rmmmmen d con,ditirrns for land divisions ur other land u&c cosi.-s in incorponted cities- 'L r)istrict also docs not plan Check 6ty land use uses or provide Stw 131v ixlcm of Kcal P-s atc letters ur oihcr R-oud hazard reports f5r such cases` Dii5hict oornr cr&s'recmmendatiuns for such c2sts Ue narmaily limited to itans of specific interest to the District including District Master Draipagc Phan facilities, other rugion41 tloodcontml ono dminagc; WIiti wNr*envId hecnnsidered a logical u5mpawrAor ien:ion of a mmAeF plan systern, and District Alma Drainage Kan fees (devtlop<ment rn itigation fees). In *dd ition, information of -a general natum, is provided. T1W DistrieL's re -vim i;� Losed on the ulowc-refurenrud projoa trans=iuml, received April 30, 24121- 'lire ] listriel has ■ reviewed the pft- M I�mjccl in dttai L, and the fallowing oomment9 dU -rut in any way constitute 4K imply Oistric.tapproval tyr un.kirsemenL Ofthe pwpo5cdprqjeart wiLhrespect Lo flood hazard, public heafth and safety, or any oLher MICh iSSUC '316i pmj�l would not be ilmpijut-rd by DistricL Ma3[er Drainage Plan facilities, nor arc other tecWtics ar"iomal inwc,-4 propkymcd- © ']iris project involves I]istriat rwcq and Ms%ter []rainagc Ilan facilities, namely, _ _ . The District will artcpt ownership ofguch fkiilitiasun wrilim request Dfthc Orly- Facil[ties mull be wnstruutta] to D-1suict standards, and District plan check and irispeei-1 n will be roquirod for Dim rici acceptance. plan cheat, inspwAiott, and administraiiwe fees will he regluirad_ ❑ This project proposes-Oannels,, wrm drAw .96 inches or largo- in diameter, flr other facilities thx could be onrisicWri5d regional in nature :mWor a logical extcn�irnn of the S&I)Lr d Murri CD=k Master Draina&v Plan- The 1} 2iLricl would consider muixpti ng ownership of such facifitics on VVrilten request of [he Oily. Foci Iitim rnust be consttucled to Distrift standardq, and Ilisric[ plan chink and ire tion wil I tic regLtircd for t)Lgtrirt aorcptanix, flaw- ehmli, InspWien, aMd adminiaMLiVe furs will be mquired. Q T1Lis project is louted within the limits -of the District's Murficts (rrc4* (E]Murrieta Valley ❑ Temecula Valky 0 gouts GertmKlis Valley QWarm Springs Vallcy) Arca Urainagc flan for City of Tomccula Re: pW I I - I0 f I00d COWXOh Ch6finel ReMoMion and Repair ,2- 23RU which drainer fps have been sdopLod- if thw p,roja,-L is; proposing to create additional i nperTium $urface area, applicable fees should be pQid by cmhicea check or muncy urder -cnllr to thic Fickod. Cori l: Dictrira or City prirrr tD issuance of }grading or building permits. Fccs to be paid should br, at the rale in elTed at Lhc lime, of ImuanA -of Lhe actua I permwt, ❑ An enerrmchrrrent pcemil shall be oblaMc J forany consu uaiun rela[od activIl ies occurri ng within District right -of war or f itities, namely. - For further infomr ation, wni,Lurt the Disrtrices E.n,c4YNachmen1 Permit Section A 951.955.1-266. 11 ' 11re DistrieVs previ,oas comrrmentg are 611 val id. GENERAL INFORMAT iON This pmojw may r gni n' a Kattinnal Pnl lutant Discharge El iminatinn stem PDF9) perm it from~ the Stato Watr~r Rcsaurccs Cunirol a -bard, CLe4irance for uadilnk, nNu-ord:alion, or other final ap"al should not be giver` until the City has determined that the project has been grand a prrmit or is shown to be tempt - I f INs project inuolm a Feral Ferrer-gency Managenient Agency (FE:MA) mapped floudpLCin, [he City should require the applicant to pr*vide all studies, calculations, plans, and usher• infor ml ion required to FnmL FEMA requilremertu, tmd should further nquire the appl"m ob4a ilk a Conditional 1,cttcr of Map Ro+rWon (CLOMK) prior try gWing, rwordalion, nr other final approval of the prgjed and -a L611,er of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to uixupancy. if a nature] waR,crcourse or mapped flnedplain is impacted by this projetA, the Cilly should require the appl scant to obtain a Sec[ion 1602 Agwmem frorrr [h,e California Department of Fish mW W i Idlife and a Clime Water Act 5,wtion 404 Permit fmm the U.S. Amy Corps of Engineers, OF WriUm correspandcnce from these aj�eneaes indicating the project is exempt from lhesye requilre nis, A Clean WaLer Ail Section 4101 Water Qual sty Ced ificalion duy be requited from the loyal Cal i forma Reginnal WxWr Quality C'onlol l-oard prior to issuance of the (:orp5 414 permit. Very truly ors, �e�e.,ti dL �e.�esr DEBORA I I LSE CHAMB EAU Fn.Siin€crin.S Prnjea Maimr Riverskle County ]Manning Department Air Phayusnh Nan thavcmgdlnuangsy SLJ:blm RESPONSE TO COMMENTS 1 RINCON BAND OF LUISENO INDIANS Comment Noted 2 RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Comment Noted City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2021040626 Project Title: PW11-10 Mitigated Negative Declaration (SCH#2021040626) for the Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair Project Location: Friendship Park (Formerly Pala Community Park) 44900 Temecula Lane, Temecula, CA 92592 Project Description: The erosion of the beds and banks are damaging and encroaching on the existing Friendship Park (Pala Community Park [Pala Park]). The City is proposing to let Temecula Creek meander naturally within the vicinity of Pala Park, however, the City is also proposing to protect Pala Park and the recreational fields from future erosion. The project consists of installing a sheet pile wall, approximately 427 feet in length, and an associated anchor system along the northern boundary of the existing soccer field in Pala Park. Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Nino Abad, P.E. Telephone Number: (951) 308-6385 This is to advise you that the City Council for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on July 27, 2021 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: �A]k] TI-, I1,C:fnri,i.; %Nillo Co„ -+try City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION & REPAIR Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between specific park sites and flood control channels, and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park sites. A report for Friendship Park, Michael "Mike" Naggar Community Park, and Long Canyon Creek Park was developed. The funding identified through Fiscal Year 2019-20 covers the construction work required to protect Friendship Park. The Future Years funding is to protect Michael "Mike" Naggar and Long Canyon Community Parks. Benefit: This project prevents further erosion into specific park sites. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A study of the affected parks was completed in Fiscal Year 2014-15. Design and construction of the recommended fixes will be implemented based on available funds. Design and Environmental Permitting for the Friendship Park portion is expected to be complete in FY20-21. Construction will begin in September 2021 and be complete by end of 2024. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.127 / PW11-10 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2020-21 Adjusted 2021-22 Proposed 2022-23 Budget Projected 2023-24 2024-25 Projected Projected 2025-26 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 211,844 79,116 220,000 510,960 Construction 56,438 1,039,501 206,000 3,822,532 5,124,471 Construction Engineering 78,500 13,500 160,000 252,000 Design & Environmental 361,734 87,691 550,000 999,425 MSHCP 52,404 6,593 191,127 250,124 Total Expenditures 630,016 1,337,212 226,093 - 4,943,659 7,136,980 Source of Funds: General Fund 650,284 650,284 Measure S 797,427 519,517 226,093 1,543,037 Unspecified 4,943,659 4,943,659 Total Funding 1,447,711 519,517 226,093 - 4,943,659 7,136,980 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 153 Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Second Amendment to Agreement with David Evans and Associates, Inc. for the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW17-25 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Avlin R. Odviar, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Second Amendment to the Agreement with David Evans and Associates, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, for additional contingency in support of the professional design and environmental services of the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW17-25 and increase the City Manager's authority to approve extra work authorizations by the same amount. BACKGROUND: On October 22, 2019, the City Council approved the agreement for consultant services with David Evans and Associates, Inc. to provide professional design and environmental services for the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW17-25. The agreement, as amended by the First Amendment ($100,000 additional contingency), is for $733,312, plus $173,331.20 of contingency under the City Manager's authority. Several extra work authorizations have been issued for services including additional traffic studies and VMT analysis, environmental services, project phasing, and additive bidding. Additional engineering and environmental services are needed to meet increased studies and requirements related to Section 401 Water Quality Certification Applications/Permits. At this time, it is appropriate to increase contingency funds for additional and unforeseen work tasks. This Second Amendment adds $100,000 in contingency and allows for bringing additional services into the agreement through extra work authorization(s). Approval of the Second Amendment results in an agreement amount of $733,312 and a contingency amount of $273,331.20, for a total encumbrance of $1,006,643.20. FISCAL IMPACT: The Diaz Road Expansion Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2022-26, and is funded with DIF (Street Improvements), Measure S, and TUMF (WRCOG). There are sufficient project funds to cover the cost of $100,000 associated with the Second Amendment. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Amendment 2. Project Description 19-a,Sg SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND DAVID EVANS AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PW17-25 DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 27, 2021 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and David Evans and Associates, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On October 22, 2019, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services Between City of Temecula and David Evans and Associates, Inc., PW17-25 Diaz Road Expansion," in the amount of $733,312.00, plus contingency in the amount of $73,331.20. b. On January 20, 2020, the City and Consultant entered into the First Amendment to the Agreement to increase the contingency in the amount of $100,000.00. C. The parties now desire to increase the contingency in the amount of $100,000.00 and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The SECOND Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($100,00.00), to increase contingency for a total Agreement amount of One Million Six Thousand Six Hundred Forty -Three Dollars and Twenty Cents ($ 1,006,643.20). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 12/31 /2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: David Evans and Associates, Inc. (rwo Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By:(V1 Mark Mine4 ce President By: Gavin Powell, Associate Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT David Evans and Associates Inc. Gavin Powell PE LEED AP 41951 Remington Avenue Suite 220 Temecula CA 92590 951-294-9346 GPowell@deainc.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initial d Date: �r1 2 12/31 /2020 f Ak `l The Heart of Southern Caii{ornia Wine Country DIAZ ROAD EXPANSION Circulation Project Project Description: Converts Diaz Road into a Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided) classification, between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. Improvements will be added to Diaz Road on its current alignment as shown in the Roadway Plan of the General Plan's Circulation Element. This project includes the design, environmental clearance, right of way acquisition, and construction necessary to complete the 2.2 mile segment, which will be developed and constructed in phases: Phase 1: Diaz Road from Winchester Rd to Rancho California Rd and Phase 2: Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Rd. Benefit: This project improves traffic circulation by expanding an important north -south arterial on the west side of the City and completes a portion of the designated Western Bypass. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: Phase 1 is in the design and environmental clearance phase. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.521 / PW17-25 Level: III City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2020-21 Adjusted 2021-22 Proposed Budget 2022-23 Projected 2023-24 2024-25 Projected Projected 2025-26 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 39,799 123,714 8,522 60,000 139,478 371,513 Construction 2,423,555 3,276,445 2,800,000 8,500,000 Construction Engineering 560,000 255,000 815,000 Design & Environmental 332,845 733,078 280,000 1,345,923 MSHCP 285,000 140,000 425,000 Total Expenditures 1 372,6441 856,792 8,522 3,328,555 3,276,445 - 3,614,4781 11,457,436 Source of Funds: DIF-Street Improvements 590 590 Measure S 162,923 8,522 3,328,555 3,500,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 1,065,923 1,065,923 Unspecified 3,276,445 3,614,478 6,890,923 Total Funding i 163,513 1,065,923 8,522 3,328,555 3,276,445 - 3,614,478 11,457,436 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs I I I Notes : 1. TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to approval of the Public Works Committee to program PAED and ENG to Diaz Road (designated Western Bypass). After the approval of the WRCOG Executive Committee, an agreement between the City and WRCOG will need to be executed. After the PAED and ENG phases are complete, City will request that any unused funds be reprogrammed to the CON phase. 66 Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Award a Construction Contract to American Asphalt South, Inc. for the Citywide Slurry Seal Program — Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01 PREPARED BY: Kendra Hannah-Meistrell, Senior Civil Engineer Chris White, Associate Engineer II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Award a Construction Contract to American Asphalt South, Inc. in the amount of $1,546,980.04 for the Citywide Slurry Seal Program — Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01; and 2. Authorize the City Manager to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $154,698, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; and 3. Make a finding that the Citywide Slurry Seal Program — Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. BACKGROUND: On May 11, 2021 the City Council approved the project specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the Citywide Slurry Seal Program — Fiscal Year 2020-21, PW21-01. The Citywide Slurry Seal Program - Fiscal Year 2020-21 is an annual project that will utilize slurry to seal the project roadways against water intrusion and deterioration of the asphalt concrete pavement wearing surface. Ideally slurry seal is applied every five to seven years as it prolongs pavement life thereby delaying more costly rehabilitation measures such as asphalt concrete overlays or removal and reconstruction. Construction involves roadway preparation by removal of existing striping and pavement markings, cleaning the roadway surface and sealing cracks. This is followed by application of slurry seal and subsequent restoration of striping and pavement markings. The project consists of slurry sealing over 7 million square feet of residential roadway throughout Temecula (see attached project location maps). The construction contract was publicly advertised between June 4, 2021 and July 6, 2021. On Tuesday, July 6, 2021 five bids were electronically opened and publicly posted on the City's online bidding service, PlanetBids. The results were as follows: Contractor Bid Amount 1. American Asphalt South, Inc. $1,546,980.04 2. VSS International, Inc. $1,592,120.00 3. Roy Allan Slurry Seal, Inc. $1,663,307.60 4. Pavement Coatings Company $1,699,421.20 5. All American Asphalt $1,780,253.12 Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found American Asphalt South, Inc. of Riverside, California to be the lowest responsive bidder. American Asphalt South, Inc. has successfully completed similar projects for various public agencies including the City of Temecula. The Engineer's estimate for the project was $1,844,783. The specifications allow for ninety working days for construction, which is 4 1/2 months. The Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) is an element of the Riverside County Integrated Project (RCIP) to conserve open space, nature preserves and wildlife to be set aside in some areas. It is designed to protect over 150 species and conserve over 500,000 acres in Western Riverside County. The City of Temecula is a permittee to the MSHCP and as such is required to abide by the Regional Conservation Authority's (RCA) Fee Remittance and Collection Policy adopted by Resolution 07-04 on September 10, 2007. The RCA is a joint regional authority formed by the County and the Cities to provide primary policy direction for implementation of the MSHCP. Beginning July 1, 2008, the RCA started requiring that locally funded Capital Improvement Projects contribute applicable MSHCP fees within 90-days of construction contract award. Fees outside the public right of way are calculated on a cost per acre of disturbed area basis, while fees for typical right of way improvements projects are five percent of construction costs. Maintenance only projects, such as this project, are exempt from MHSCP fees. FISCAL IMPACT: The Citywide Slurry Seal is included in the Fiscal Year 2021-22 Operating Budget and is funded with Measure A. Adequate funds are available for the contract amount of $1,546,980.04, plus a 10% contingency amount of $154,698 for a total encumbrance of $1,701,678.04. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Contract 2. Project Location Maps 3. Slurry Seal Street List CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACT for CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2020-21 PROJECT NO. PW21-01 THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 2711 day of July 2021 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City", and American Asphalt South, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Contractor." WITNESSETH: That City and Contractor, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree as follows: CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The complete Contract includes all of the Contract Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2020-21, PROJECT NO. PW21-01, Insurance Forms, this Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard Plans and Specifications, (latest edition), issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc. (hereinafter, "Standard Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2020-21, PROJECT NO. PW21-01. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from the publisher: BNi Building News Division of BNi Publications, Inc. 990 Park Center Drive, Suite E Vista, CA 92081 (760) 734-1113 The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials, and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2020-21, PROJECT NO. PW21-01. In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in lieu of, such conflicting portions. Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. Unless otherwise specified, the Contractor shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract. The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract. 2. SCOPE OF WORK Contractor shall perform everything required to be performed, shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the following: CITYWIDE SLURRY SEAL PROGRAM - FISCAL YEAR 2020-21, PROJECT NO. PW21-01 All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents hereinabove enumerated and adopted by City. 3. CITY APPROVAL All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished, and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to the approval of City or its authorized representatives. 4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE The City agrees to pay, and Contractor agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED FORTY-SIX THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED EIGHTY DOLLARS AND FOUR CENTS ($1,546,980.04), the total amount of the base bid. Contractor agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed 90 working days, commencing with delivery of a Notice to Proceed by City. Construction shall not commence until bonds and insurance are approved by City. 5. CHANGE ORDERS All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order, changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as established by the City Council. PAYMENTS a. Lump Sum Bid Schedule: Before submittal of the first payment request, the Contractor shall submit to the Director of Public Works a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as the Director of Public Works may require. This schedule, as approved by the Director of Public Works, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the Contractor's payment requests. b. Unit Price Bid Schedule: Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within 30 days after submission of a payment request to the City, the Contractor shall be paid a sum equal to 95% of the value of the work* completed according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on or about the 30th day of each successive month as the work progresses. The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be made 60 days after acceptance of final payment and the Contractor filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the City on forms provided by the City. C. Payment for Work Performed: Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law, accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an acceptance of any part of the work. d. Patent of Interest; Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within 30 days pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference. 7. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES / EXTENSION OF TIME a. Liquidated Damages: In accordance with Government Code Section 53069.85, Contractor agrees to forfeit and pay to City the sum of $1,000 per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted from any payments due to or to become due to Contractor. b. Extension of Time: Contractor will be granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor, including delays caused by City. Within ten calendar days of the occurrence of such delay, Contractor shall give written notice to City. Within 30 calendar days of the occurrence of the delay, Contractor shall provide written documentation sufficient to support its delay claim to City. Contractor's failure to provide such notice and documentation shall constitute Contractor's waiver, discharge, and release of such delay claims against City. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6 above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation as to work related to the payment. Unless the Contractor has disputed the amount of the payment, the acceptance by Contractor of each payment shall constitute a release of all claims against the City related to the payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment. 9. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http.ftwww.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or subcontractor hired and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1720.9, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE Time is of the essence in this contract. 11. INDEMNIFICATION All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or in preparing or delivering materials to the site shall be at the risk of Contractor alone. Contractor agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons (Contractor's employees included), and damage to property, arising directly or indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by Contractor, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City. The Contractor shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the City for any and all costs incurred by the City as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The City shall deduct such costs from progress payments or final payments due to the Contractor. 1Z GRATUITIES Contractor warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to City's employees, agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable treatment with respect thereto. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Contractor warrants that none of its partners, members or shareholders are related by blood or marriage to any employee of the City who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or who will administer this project nor are they in any way financially associated with any City officer or employee, or any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this project. Contractor further warrants that no person in its employ nor any person with an ownership interest in the Contractor has been employed by the City within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids. 14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT After the completion of the work contemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 15, NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES Whenever the Contractor has knowledge that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely performance of the Contract, Contractor shall immediately give notice thereof, including all relevant information with respect thereto, to City. 16. BOOKS AND RECORDS Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 17. INSPECTION The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plants of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work. 18. DISCRIMINATION Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 19. GOVERNING LAW The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. 20. PROHIBITED INTEREST No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body who has participated in the development of the specifications or approval of this project or will administer this project shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the Contract or the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the Contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 21. ADA REQUIREMENTS By signing this Contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-336, as amended. 22. WRITTEN NOTICE Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid, directed to the address of the Contractor as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the City addressed as follows: Mailing and Delivery Address: Patrick A. Thomas, PE Director of Public Works / City Engineer City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 23. CLAIM DISPUTE RESOLUTION In the event of any dispute or controversy with the City over any matter whatsoever, the Contractor shall not cause any delay or cessation in or of work but shall proceed with the performance of the work in dispute. The Contractor shall retain any and all rights provided that pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the parties. The disputed work will be categorized as an "unresolved dispute" and payment, if any, shall be as later determined by mutual agreement or a court of law. The Contractor shall keep accurate, detailed records of all disputed work, claims and other disputed matters. All claims arising out of or related to the Contract or this project, and the consideration and payment of such claims, are subject to the Government Claims Act (Government Code Section 810 et seq.) with regard to filing claims. All such claims are also subject to Public Contract Code Section 9204 and Public Contract Code Section 20104 et seq. (Article 1.5), where applicable. This Contract hereby incorporates those provisions as though fully set forth herein. Thus, the Contractor or any Subcontractor must present a claim in accordance with the Government Claims Act as a prerequisite to prosecuting any claim against the City. The filing or prosecution of a claim in compliance with Section 9204 and/or Article 1.5 (if applicable) does not in any way obviate the need to timely present a claim under the Government Claims Act, or in any toll the expiration of any limitations period for the timely presentation of a claim under the Government Claims Act. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the date first above written. DATED: CONTRACTOR: American Asphalt South, Inc. 19792 El Rivino Road Riverside, Ca. 92509 (909) 427-8276 Jeffp@americanasphaltsouth.com By: Jeff Petty _ Print or type NAME President Print or type TITLE* By: _ A'Al Tim Griffin Print or type NAME Secretary Print or type TITLE* (*Signatures of two corporate officers require for Corporations) by -Al 1:19] Rand! Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CITY OF TEMECULA By: Maryann Edwards, Mayor rf', 6,. City of Temecula - Slurry Seal 2021 Q- SUZI LN 9.. SKYLINE DR I U_LLLc'Lr1iR . R p COUNTRY VIEW RD Gr� fop LIEFERR5D . �� �(P D o GATLI_N RD DYN OP ST C JS�\ FN.DR a r (LN �S"(ON p� yC Q FOR O�Q m .0 coMM L . oil� pFtNY RBpGPRS R FIN6�p _ MAOREO W •�` ♦ C\ "� ° A:c ♦p%IiLTEGIRASOL �.Z ■ 2 r ♦ * '*o R/q ✓z �--M\BAN°Rp Ro _ i •p F !0,14 1 - K ti P �wN Hip p 2 ` + Mq NRD Rv� VJ - 2. O.O CO �' J NGH EER MEPD° x�ly FN CT ` io ti■■ �• > , R Oq/ R/STIAN L 'O; ,,. sw..,: r<BERRYGT z•♦.i■yl♦a♦�0.. O� Q9 OSF v0� ; 'OLVk.p\ELp a c�♦i r 44 m F fg S�o° NO \OP Q �h• ♦♦ �♦ ♦ 'i `DO q Wr' � R .♦ �♦.•.T=•�� - ■■RE , 9RVES� QJ :. N c a o � o •. ♦r+w a w • EQU .a.;�� d � y,� CT � o'-, a d. - .� \ rQ i�l' �:KLj■ R�LN'�: �.♦ �00 : '+ �'_� r+. ��.. r, U ' �I' s ��FLL��.. �O •\�O �U.■r �A���� O oof +r '' '�ii`w f •■,• ,tY GGA. ., *+ i'V_ .W; 1■1+� • a ,� ♦ ♦ yJ?� U ■a ;'' .,pQ�� •+' Y ¢ _ g� ....";K...�P\�, EA RD P ?.■rau Oy�,rJ■1 +/� a w p.. t G ♦ ♦W .-' 4`��■ REBOS ♦� • ♦ G� / . `t ♦ O' s ,� ar`, `'ter• 1., �� ♦i■9�o'w �FCENITA� p � „1q ' _ `_ ice• y,1HEITZLN ♦ m9a■ tcn .{�G♦♦ r R s� s i91� Ltd `' •` ' •'O {' }h•S�P ' �m ■•a 4 ♦O♦�i pR"`/c•■rD. F ) F Z_+'.,-.�_--- •0 ♦ 4♦' •tea ♦ Os n 3 • AOFL SOL RO �S`'.'t-Q.Q4' �'+ii IVO�F Ems! •►y♦A �• w♦0•,10 j =� S �� GHA ! • +♦ ♦ f 9P! p '?= U s -._m t OELREYF v P5 s�^^:■'. TsO �p ♦i� ��a ♦� FT o <� i ,,•-m : r�� pq `+.�.. e: U mac\ •♦♦�t��♦►w♦♦�R pA-�+�r■ i0 N�YH♦*. pJtr, Np DR zC� •'♦�+• ftF 1"2V .:..,m.,..e: }d :`fi '� - s ♦a .. '<� SQ9RSIC, ,�..,%../.'NA�'C.* OLAD"m,°�gCrI uQ,'•a•F•p��y��iF��♦iirLJ >♦♦ moor ♦r♦\n`yr♦ ♦ a♦♦ 7��♦G♦� ,♦> I~'w47 QynkN Qi ♦♦i ■■♦u♦ i ♦i90� ♦♦ ♦i :Py.;' r ~►� • P���.�- O+ANPPiQUP 'E $ S Li♦� ���� •�Q■■•�"'Q� • 4J! �■ti, �� d'• fir►♦ u P� . O+ nl, . ♦Z / ,♦ ' i �P� z Z M COR - O ..-y . a pS1♦♦ v♦ . b10�� :E. �• �On/ So �' W ¢.u•' 7 _ \LL _ ,<P crjnw D ••'� ¢.D� ♦ .o•. i' ;1 l\P y �G v sm /tea - • Q� uo S zf%alliia-P l' t►O♦ SC T. ♦ g V'STALAO / n� S ♦♦L2� O O. ♦•SIN ���J♦N�• 0� ,. D ,� Z EGG y ��R O• JU �♦ Y- • t c �; g = �♦ L� 1 Q9 C a. "- c O. '�sZ • n . 1�0 ♦i► Pam; _ m> ♦ ,� O O n -+ .,• M� tZ, Oda ♦�mi �Cj rtu� 4i11�z�♦♦ r Off♦ r♦ ,lr1E�0 �••�.: 9 z A K % CO r, w: LOG ,P♦� .�i■ n1♦ f'A er Ww Q '� ONRD m Z rH ♦� . gE ♦ � O .■ $ ie 1 •1 � � <.."..:.:: � ♦vA A u�.�OrIiA� O♦ U� QP �'(P, O� •� r 'S . > �. ! -• i +s.= y D r . a m o _ n �i•♦ 00 4r as o �♦ ♦� O\' - Qy- 2i.,.. BEND t ' S OP55 ti i '• p�' l: _ : w.., 2anC 5�:+� •�♦i �= i• �� a� ;.. O PO 20 ....Vv�� r• !WN-�Ft(E �.. •Y�iiii�el;, ,- rrm— LINK 9� � ,� a..+� Q A � G- GO O� (YNp Q�,��,:� o MIL/r� 24y� •♦♦♦% p,P-�''a� �� O O o �' mom\ ,S F� y _ m `z nnu...u� n �P�JE G° SCPp�o— \i GOJR NPM6 O% �O �O 9� �m NmA•LY� 4"' ♦ `2 O � ♦ '. ';'!� Q�♦qS�° i'• �J.a:,:,",,I .;:.:`.; O i<,• .%n�G°�lil �� e.'y �1 - Qr1P•���e'p,'A 'ACL►�. �♦ O "po • � * �3' � ti � � ✓'~l� �O � ' ,,¢ - ::;AGENFST. �. o LAMAR w � x ''Y pPj• y � U yC .,,. 0'• ' i % yd OAS; ROMP i D FJ?�♦Y�tXM ►. ;✓ O ZOG��7� tt.�� •—W ��� '• „«• GO M� _ y _G S UO gb�p�AD m +n 3 s � .o s1 0 9NDDR' '�'y GPM\N��•a ��Fs caRRAS;„♦•�i 92i P`S s"..10� of CPDELI F.ELIXVP�(O � � •- 'A_.,- < rr fy� 20 NE � -- F- A- A(2 ��♦ 9 gC �F �RD @ �i�UTAV� ,COLINgG /'A URARD z '♦ GOR N �S w Oi �M QA bCo �Z PCB U 7 HA LCON �m � > v Z �..IJJ u,�w �< D a UQ 3gNpEva°'R O t�S a ' V a d�na�,. J J ♦ + . CP, O rn FJI > a-M O ti RIDGEQ 0� .�� �S,T ;m m IABRlg' """ rt •• i- \P ¢ �� , y i ;;,; ¢ FA'q C m at< s C 5 5 y aG'F �11 ss f � V—: d� /` BPS' : • n ° J' >_ : j ° I/ i° I� 09 �S �� ip0 . °p9 Q s j • . `' �'�4 <<ENO� t a C9` _ • Bpi O? LE CT G , _ . ► a.n E `. LEENA i� Q�� vv GNPNjE..♦ ,gPN(\P ,t r� 00 ♦ :"'a7; <-G °TUTAFLORE �9Y y Er �C1AREN, i, -SS 74 ✓ BAGOJ I� O•Q i t O � %4= ;� • N r .. 1 �Q � � � ♦. �. < A c°pp'"••: .,f��s. tjO RA U FL Ski �a 0 09■ = Q� y ~ �� ��- ' Y r p " 9 o !\ G DA• �_FPIP Yq `@O. - " ' .p�` . a -PE ' F� ♦ ♦ O� rr- ' , g, tis i o e• S ;` �` • O �2i t F s r♦ O J m !2 *_ r y - a oe ye �F v { F< t�G, 1.1 0% ..' Q ➢ Leo -,. U, • -� ES 'f', O ry t q r'r O t9q ♦ �O r �� g'(E ,. Q a < , • EGe riCpN� \p OE OR' . `: • Ao F� \ OR• !�� + s q� O O A • . c4 .`..• GP�� ai. J �PRP N 1 r �POO�} Z o�'icoS uj ♦ ' ♦ m• `r '\ 'A O� -Q- •.-a Q' r .t k .,' T< >6 ' - A=' � � *+pi 0 �v C O 9� • Q�P �, s , � O � <a� � m�. � DPR��L�R�.• +• � • N: �pUP.S,�. Q9t t f '' •• ' w`� ,g �DEP gE0 t3 'VALLEJO AVE.; a � ' � � � et � e.� �G 4so�" � • � ��r � D fR\ �� P�GGgO _ w C+Up � r�� ■. ,.• r w + `TEME � ►...,pP�L \ 'sr m,�..O�MECULPRO v" 1i�O QOR �: S ., C//�N( FNO LN SAMANTyA LN -TAyLO M ` J\PRIO \NDA F?D o ^'" \° NJe Ss PPvGoO- z ° Ow VCREEr!PN ,F a RUFP A lq c�BA VIg-DFZ RD .• R POD y � !� o OER � bi .\�' '• V/ \Jp '•r a O m , OQ w �JEN ��� 9Q STq V� �10 r� CL Sti TG Legend GQLIF Q ' F ly'� rl CUtij SSG �q( qy \P� EiO `m � p� , Slurry Seal 2021 S\ 4 � <9y , '�G O S� '\ '9 .. � S � ON b0 ��� S � � OJ p�� JQ-r'� �Q- � ♦ l u� _•-r f=„= ..� J� O+.pb �P 1� OJ�irOJ�O S; �} o q,�s ' 5,640,067 sq ft Av �u �� ' �� �FpS �o Fo O AzO E sT\'�� gsGr C,, lo,:°/ .'•- e•-•t a" N !y A �cA'F9o<F 'gin:., y Cq�L Highways PK OP r �2i0 p �� •arse FOR C �;, 0 � Public Facilities Temecula Parks ROCKY RAB DRY j CA` qFC Building Footprints 9 HANGq - City Boundary �- PECR0 0 0.5 1 Miles The map SlurryDistricts_2021.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update I I I I I and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this Al map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis Updated 6/25/2021 7uectrY01F TEMECULA De Portola Road Legend Parcels City of Temecula Boundary Notes 166.7 0 583.33 1,166.7 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site a is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not GS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise reliat Latitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATIC Aft City of Temecula - Slurry Seal 2021 'W Will, s OAK G�, �ti�A 0,9G� 1 ff] Public Facilities aTemecula Parks Building Footprints City Boundary 0 50 100 Feet The map SlurryDistricts_2021_TopsfieldCt.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update I I I I I and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis Updated 2/18/2021 0 a: Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2009-2010 �O m Project No. PW09-06 G� Q 0 0 rr LA Slurry Seal Area Centerline LA 0 120 240 480 720 960 Feet May 19,2009 This map was made by the City of Temecula Geographic Information System. The map is derived from base data produced by the Riverside County Assessor's Department and the Transportation and Land Management Agency of Riverside County. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Data and information represented on this map Y q�F,yy p are subject to update and modification. The Geographic Information System for the ��1 A F< and other sources should be queried most current information. This map is not for reprint or resale. s m °< r.\gislarcmap projects\public works\slurry seal chdswhile kb.mxd Alk (14, � -,rIz Citywide Slurry Seal Project FY 2020-2021 Project No. PW 21-01 Addendum No. 2 EASTGATE PO4 D I � OA �U O� 2 RITA WAY f VQ/ � r I] Q ' 0v4v t\T CT o Mo to LU �O > �y�p PL KEPRNY RD O p\ER a O � B PRT pL c� G OG 7 N m \\-DER R\DGE CT I RE DR Q S O PMPD � S\ERR N\Co\"PS RD / 9 WPY / o `ouST \ �g t4l,-p' ko RD 16 LINDEN CT O SALERN IRD MULBERRY CT DEER MEADOW RD C9� Legend Slurry Seal Area Roads City Boundary -- CORTE COE A2 -C _4 0 250 500 Feet The map SlurryDistricts PW21-01.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this ii map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at hftps://temeculaca.gov/gis Updated 6/30/2021 Master Street Names: AHERN PL ALTON CT AVENIDA MALLARI AZUCENA CT BRITTON CIR CAFERALN CALLE ELENITA CARLENA LN CEBU DR CERCLE BEAUREGARD CERCLE CHAMBERTIN CERCLE LATOUR CHABLIS CT CHEMIN CHEVALIER CHEMIN CLINET CHEMIN DOMAINE CHEMIN LA TACHE CHEMIN LAURENT CHEMIN MARGAUX CHENIN BLANC ST CONCANNON CT CORTE CYNTHIA COUR BEAUNE COUR CITRAN COUR MAGDELAINE COUR MEYNEY COUR POMEROL DANIEL WY DUNES CT DURNEY CT ESSEX CT FLAG WY HEITZ LN JULO WY MERLOT CREST MERLOT CT MONTELENA CIR PARDUCCILN PASOS PL PINOT BLANC CT AMBERLEY CIR AMBERLEY CIR ANDREA CIR ANDREA CIR ASHMILL CT AURORA CT AVENIDA ENRIQUE BARET CT BENTLEY CT BRIXTON COVE CABERN CT CALLE COLIBRI CALLE KATERINE CALLE MEDUSA CHALDON CIR CHALON CT CHANTILLY CIR CHAUNCEY WY CLEAR LIGHT RD DANE CT ENFIELD LN EVEREST RD GOLDEN LION DR HUMBOLT CT JEFFREY HEIGHTS RD JURA CT KAHWEA RD KLARER LN LEIGH LN LUZON ST MONIQUE CIR NEW TOWN DR NOB CT REYES CT RIVERTON LN STAMOS CT VALONE CT WELLINGTON CIR WGASA PL WINDSOR RD ASHBURNRD BALATA DR BELLERIVE CT BERKSHIRE LN BOGEY WY BRANFORD DR BRASSIE LN BRITTON CIR BUNKER DR BUNKERS WY BURGESS CT CALLE ELENITA CANTERBURY CT CASCADES CT CHAMPIONS CIR COG HILL DR COLONIAL CT CONGRESSIONAL DR CROOKED STICK DR CRYSTALAIRE DR CULBERTSON LN CYPRESS POINT WY DELMONTE ST DOG LEG CIR DRIVER LN EAGLE CT EAGLE POINT WY FIRESTONE ST FORE WY GLENEAGLES DR HONORS DR INVERNESS CT IRON CIR LAKERIDGE CT LAUREL VALLEY CIR LINKS CT MASHIE WY MEADOW BROOK WY MEDINAH WY MONTEREY PL PLACER BELAIR PLACER CONDRIEU PLACER LAFITE PROMENADE BORDEAUX PROMENADE CHARDONNAY HILLS RIESLING CT RUEJADOT SAINT CROIX SAINT ELOI SAINT MICHEL SAUVIGNON CIR SEBASTIANI CIR SIMI CT SOMERSET HILLS SONOMA LN VINEYARD AV VINTAGE CIR WIEBEL CIR ZINFANDEL AV BOGART PL CROSS CREEK CT GOLDEN ROD RD JACARANDA CT MOONLIGHT CT NORTH GENERAL KEARNY RD PAUMA VALLEY RD SIERRA MADRE DR SILVER RIDGE CT TERRIL CT TISCHA DR VALERIANA CT VERDES LN WARBLER CIR YARDLEY CT TOPSFIELD CT DE PORTOLA ROAD APRIL DR ARALIA CT BARBERRY CT BOLANDRA CT CAMINO CAMPOS VERDES CAMPANA CIR CANARY CIR CERVANTES WY CHANTEMAR WY DANDELION CT JIMSON CIR JON CHRISTIAN PL JUNE CT JUNE RD LARK CT LINNITT CIR MANCERA WY MARIAN RD MIMULUS WY NELLIE CT ODESSA DR PARKSIDE DR RORIPAUGH RD ROSEBAY CT SANDERLING WY SARAH DR SIENNA CT SONORA CIR STANFORD DR STARLING ST NASSAU CT NIBLICK RD OAK HILL DR OTTER CREEK CIR PACIFIC GROVE WY PAR WAY PENNANT CT PIN WAY PINE TREE CIR POINT WOODS CT POOLE CT PUTTER CIR ROYAL BIRKDALE DR ROYAL DORNOCH CT ROYAL OAKS DR SANDHILL LN SEA ISLAND CT SEMINOLE ST SLICE WY SOUTHERN HILLS DR SPOON CIR SPYGLASS HILLS LN SUNNINGDALE DR TEE DR TEMEKU DR VARDON DR WEDGE WY WINGED FOOT ST SWEET BRIER CR TANAGER CIR WARBLER DR SWALLOW CT Item No. 10 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 13, 2021 CALL TO ORDER at 7:51 PM: President Schwank ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Stewart, Second by Rahn. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 15. Approve Action Minutes of June 22, 2021 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of June 22, 2021. 16. Approve Agreement with VisionOne for Theater Ticketing Software Services at the Old Town Temecula Communitv Theater Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve an agreement with VisionOne, Inc. for ticketing software services for the Old Town Temecula Community Theater, for a three-year term and authorize annual payments not to exceed $40,000. 17. Approve Agreement with Christian Stitchery dba So Cal Impressions for Screen Printing_, Embroidery, Artwork and Promotional Items Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve an agreement with Christian Stitchery dba So Cal Impressions to provide screen printing, embroidery, artwork, and promotional items at various City events and programs for Fiscal Years 2021-2022 through 2025-2026, in an amount not to exceed $150,000 over the five-year term. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 7:53 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, July 27, 2021 at 5:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 11 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement with Douglas Hiner Umpiring Service for Slow Pitch Officiating Services PREPARED BY: Andrew Formentera, Community Services Assistant RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors approve the three-year agreement with Douglas Hiner Umpiring Services for slow pitch officiating services in an amount not to exceed $31,000 annually. BACKGROUND: On April 1, 2021, the Temecula Community Services Department entered into an agreement with Douglas Hiner Umpiring Service for the City -run slow pitch softball league for the Winter/Spring 2021 season, with the term expiring June 30, 2021. With the expiration of this term, and after the bidding process, Douglas Hiner Umpiring Services was selected as the successful bidder for a new three-year term. The services to be rendered include • Providing "Qualified Officials" who have appropriate experience, training, and certification • Providing appropriate scheduling and supervision for league officials at all City leagues and tournaments • Conducting on -site evaluations of officials to insure appropriate service and performance levels are maintained This agreement has a three-year term with an option to extend for one additional two-year term. FISCAL IMPACT: This agreement will provide officiating services for three years in an amount not to exceed $31,000 annually and $93,000 over the term of the agreement. Adequate funds have been appropriated as part of the Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Annual Operating Budget. Future years will be addressed during the budget process. ATTACHMENTS: Agreement AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND DOUGLAS HINER DBA DH UMPIRE SERVICES COMPANY THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of July 27, 2021, between the Temecula Community Services District, a community services district (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and Douglas Hiner dba DH Umpire Services Company, Sole Proprietor, (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: fir flM This Agreement shall commence on July 27, 2021 and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than June 30, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. The City may, upon mutual agreement, extend the contract for one (1) additional two (2) year term. In no event shall the contract be extended beyond June 30, 2026. If Agreement is extended beyond the original term, the Agreement price shall be adjusted at the beginning of each fiscal year in accordance with the changes in the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Core Based Statistical Area using the most recently published month annual percentage change. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PEREORM_ANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Thirty -One Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($31,000) each fiscal year for a total not to exceed Agreement amount of Ninety -Three Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($93,000.00) unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the General Manager. Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts 12/31 /2020 and in the manner as agreed to by General Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant's fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement, Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of Fifty Dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. ► r ► � R _ill 1 ■ l � ' ► ll ► A ■ � a a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 6. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the General Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 7. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of 12/31/2020 City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. 8. INDFMNIF(CATI N The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, agents, employees or volunteers may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any way related to the performance or non- performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the negligence of the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. a. Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. b. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: 1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. 2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. 12/31 /2020 3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. 4) Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. C. Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1) General Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 2) Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4) Professional Liability Coverage: One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. d. Deductibles and Self -insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty -Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents($25,000). e. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and the Successor Agency to the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 12/31 /2020 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state in substantial conformance to the following: If the policy will be canceled before the expiration date the insurer will notify in writing to the City of such cancellation not less than thirty (30) days' prior to the cancellation effectivedate. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. f. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A-:VII or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. g. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 10. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 11. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 12/31 /2020 a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the General Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 13. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: General Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: DH Umpire Service Attn: Douglas Hiner 377 Overleaf Way San Jacinto, CA 92583 ► uL�a0 The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 15. LICENSES 12/31 /2020 At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. i�;ii{I►[HW�►�i�� The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into thisAgreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. MENEWHIT9HUM 011 WN =159111 M I • I PRETOi 11 1 The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The General Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreementtermination. 12/31 /2020 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT By: Zak Schwank, President ATTEST: By: Rand! Johl, Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: DOUGLAS HINER DBA DH UMPIRE SERVICES COMPANY (Two signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Peter M. Thorson, General CONSULTANT Counsel DH Umpire Service Attn: Douglas Hiner 377 Overleaf Way San Jacinto, CA 92582 (951)392-5948 City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: MSY 06-29-2021 12/31 /2020 EXHIBIT A Tasks to be Performed The specific elements (scope of work) of this service include: 1, gESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CQNSULTAN . The Consultant shall be responsible for assigning Qualified Officials for all scheduled City League games and tournaments according to the terms which follow. Requests for services will be made on an as -needed basis for the City of Temecula Community Services District at various park facilities: a. Provide "Qualified Officials" who have appropriate experience, training, and certification b. Provide appropriate scheduling and supervision for league officials at all City leagues and tournaments; c. Require all officials to purchase, maintain in good order and wear while officiating Temecula league and tournament games, the prescribed uniform and equipment to fulfill the terms of the contract; d. Conduct on -site evaluations of officials to insure appropriate service and performance levels are maintained. Will periodically provide the Sports Manager copies of evaluations; e. Provide, at no additional cost to the City, representatives to attend any league organizational meeting as deemed necessary by the Sports Manager, when sufficient notice of meeting is given; f. Provide, maintain, and repair the equipment, materials, supplies, and similar items, necessary for the proper conduct of the officiating to beperformed; Within five business days of the date of this Agreement, Consultant shall provide City with a list of the Qualified Officials it will draw from in making assignments to be approved by the Director of Community Services or designee. The Consultant shall update the list each time a new official is added; g. Should an official, for any reason within his/her control, cause a game to be protested, Consultant shall submit a verbal report to the City of the circumstances on the following day and a written report shall be provided, if required, within five (5) days. Officials shall be provided by the Consultant, at no cost to the City for any rescheduled game resulting from a protest that is upheld; h. Consultant shall assist the City in the handling of protests, including but not limited to, representing the official(s) at protest meetings, as required; 12/31 /2020 i. When a grievance is filed with the Consultant, the Consultant shall notify the City in writing not more than five (5) days after the grievance is filled with the Consultant and provide a copy of the grievance. 2. RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE CITY a. City has the right to refuse the services of any Consultant official, with or without cause, provided the City notifies the Consultant of its decision and Consultant shall not assign any such official to City games; b. City shall provide fields in playable condition and set up necessary equipment for games; c. City is to provide the Consultant with a copy of all by-laws and rules unique to the conduct of their games; d. City shall schedule all games as to the time and location. A complete schedule of games shall be furnished to the Consultant in sufficient time as to allow for scheduling of officials. When a game is rescheduled or canceled after notification, the Consultant shall be apprised at least three (3) hours in advance. If this time frame is not met, the District shall pay all fees due as if the game was played; e. Officials shall appear at the game site at least fifteen (15) minutes prior to the scheduled starting time. Should officials fail to appear for a game, when properly notified, the Consultant shall forfeit the fee in the amount as if the game were played for each official who did not show. Games not played due to the non-appearance of one or both scheduled teams, inclement weather, or other misfortune, will be paid for by City at the rate as if the game were played per official, provided an official(s) is present. Should a game in progress be canceled or terminated for any reason, the City shall pay all fees due as if the game was played. 10 12/31 /2020 EXHIBIT B Payment Rates and Schedule Cost for services shall be as per Contractors proposal attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full but in no event shall the total cost of services exceed $93,000 for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in the Payment section of this Agreement. 11 12/31 /2020 Item No. 12 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AGENDA REPORT TO: General Manager/Board of Directors FROM: Kevin Hawkins, Director of Community Services DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Approve Temecula Community Services District Proposed Rates and Charges for Fiscal Year 2021-22 PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors hold a public hearing and adopt resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B — RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, SERVICE LEVEL D — RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND SERVICE LEVEL R — EMERGENCY UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 BACKGROUND: The Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) operates under the authority of Community Services District Law and provides residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection and unpaved road maintenance services in the City of Temecula. The boundaries of the TCSD are coterminous with the City and the City Council serves as the Board of Directors of the TCSD. Property owners pay only for the TCSD services used or made available to their property through separate rates and charges on their property tax bill. The Community Services, Parks and Recreation and Service Level A Rates and Charges previously levied by the TCSD were replaced by the City's Parks/Lighting Services Special Tax, approved by the voters as Measure C on March 4, 1997. Although the TCSD continues to operate and maintain the parks and recreational facilities through a cooperative agreement with the City, the actual levy budget for the special tax is scheduled to be considered and approved by the City Council on July 27, 2021. The TCSD is required to complete an annual levy process, which includes adopting a resolution to accept the filing of a report on the proposed rates and charges necessary to provide the following services; noticing each affected property owner in the City; and conducting a public hearing to consider approving the proposed rates and charges. The four current service levels of the TCSD include: 1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting. 2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. 3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Collection. 4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance. 1. Service Level B — Residential Street Lighting The TCSD Rates and Charges for Service Level B are not proposed to increase from last year's rates. The rate is capped at $25.68 per single family residential. 2. Service Level C — Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance As a result of various property owner elections, there are two zones subject to an annual rate increase. The rate increase is the lesser of: (1) the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario, for the previous calendar year (2) 5% The Annual CPI change for 2020 was 1.87%. As a result, the following zones will see a slight increase in the rates for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Zone No. and Name 6 - Woodcrest County 29 - Gallery Portraits 20-21 Rate 21-22 Rate Increase $116.87 $119.04 $2.17 $417.12 $424.90 $7.78 3. Service Level D — Residential Recycling and Refuse Service Per the Franchise Agreement with CR&R, the change in CPI and land -fill tipping fees determine the increase/decrease in the annual Service Level D rate and charge. An increase of $8.54 is proposed to the annual rate and charge for Service Level D from $303.19 to $311.73 per residential unit beginning Fiscal Year 2021-22. The increase is due to a CPI increase of 0.78% and a land- fill tipping fee increase of 2.25%, and an increase of $3.57 to maintain fund balance in Fund 194. 4. Service Level R — Unpaved Street and Road Maintenance Service Level R will not be levied for Fiscal Year 2021-22. However, due to feedback from residents within Service Level R who attended a meeting held by the City on June 17, 2021, the City will continue maintaining the roads for Service Level R and resume levying the properties within the boundaries of the Service Level commencing Fiscal Year 2022-2023. As per Proposition 218 all property owners are required to be noticed as to the rates and proposed charges that the TCSD will be assessing at least 45 days prior to the public hearing. Notices were mailed on June 11, 2021 calling for a July 27, 2021 public hearing. On May 25, 2021, the TCSD Board of Directors approved a Resolution of Intention that called for the public hearing to be held on July 27, 2021. The levy and collection of the TCSD Rates and Charges is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 21080 (b)(8) of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing services within the TCSD. The total revenue for all service levels as written in the attached 2021-22 Engineer's Annual Levy Report is $11,139,756 which varies slightly from the Annual Operating Budget due to timing differences in the production of the two documents. The revisions did not result in any rate increases. FISCAL IMPACT: The revenue generated for the TCSD Fiscal Year 2021-22 rates and charges will fund residential street lighting; perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance; recycling and refuse collection services in the City of Temecula. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution — Service Levels B, C and D 2. Exhibit A —Project Summary 3. Fiscal Year 2021-22 Final Engineer's Report RESOLUTION NO. CSD 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING RATES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICE LEVEL B — RESIDENTIAL STREET LIGHTING, SERVICE LEVEL C — PERIMETER LANDSCAPING, SERVICE LEVEL D — RECYCLING AND REFUSE COLLECTION, AND SERVICE LEVEL R — EMERGENCY UNPAVED ROAD MAINTENANCE SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 2021-22 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Upon incorporation of the City of Temecula, effective December 1, 1989, voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), to provide specified services to properties within its jurisdiction. Section 2. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD has prescribed, revised and collected rates and charges for the services furnished by it, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, property taxes collected within the TCSD in the same manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. By previous resolution, the TCSD proposed to continue such rates and charges for the operation, maintenance, service and administration of residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, recycling and refuse collection, and emergency unpaved road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2020-21. Section 3. Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, the TCSD caused a written report ("Report") to be prepared and filed with the Secretary of the TCSD, which Report contains a description of each parcel of real property and the proposed amount of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2021-22. The Report is based upon a budget adopted by the Board of Directors for the proposed services for specific areas where such services are provided including necessary staff and administrative expenses. A summary of the Report containing the proposed rates and charges is attached hereto as Exhibit A, entitled "Project Summary", and incorporated herein by this reference. A copy of the Report is on file in the office of the Secretary of the TCSD, and is available for public inspection. Section 4. By previous resolution, the Board of Directors acknowledged the filing of the Report, and appointed a time and place for a public hearing on the Report and the proposed rates and charges. Notice of the public hearing was mailed as required by law on June 11, 2021 calling for a public hearing on July 27, 2021. Notice was published as required by law and affidavits of publication and mailing are on file with the Secretary of the TCSD. Section 5. On July 27, 2021, the Board of Directors held a duly noticed public hearing at which the Board of Directors heard and considered all oral and written objections, protests and comments by interested person concerning the Report, the proposed rates and charges, and the method of collection of such rates and charges. Section 6. The Board of Directors hereby finds that, based on the Report and the District budget, the rates and charges as set out on Exhibit "A" do not exceed the reasonable cost of the services to be provided by the TCSD for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Section 7. The Board of Directors hereby overrules any and all objections and protests and adopts the rates and charges for residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping, recycling and refuse collection and emergency unpaved road maintenance services for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as set out on Exhibit A. Section 8. The TCSD shall collect such rates and charges at the same time and in the same manner and by the same persons as, together with and not separately from, the property taxes collected within the TCSD. These rates and charges shall be delinquent at the same time and thereafter be subject to the same delinquency penalties as such property taxes. All laws applicable to the levy, collection, and enforcement of property taxes, including, but not limited to, those pertaining to the matters of delinquency, correction, cancellation, refund and redemption, are applicable to these rates and charges, except for California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 4831. However, if for the first year the charge is levied, the real property to which the charge relates has been transferred or conveyed to a bona fide purchaser for value, or if a lien or a bona fide encumbrancer for value has been created and attaches thereon, prior to the date on which the first installment of such taxes appear on the roll, then the charge shall not result in a lien against the property, but instead shall be transferred to the unsecured roll for collection. Section 9. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges questions the classification of the owner's property for Fiscal Year 2021-22, or claims that an error has been made with respect to the implantation of the rates and charges or the application of the rates and charges to the owner's property for that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing an appeal with the Secretary of the TCSD before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2021, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the appeal of classification or correction of errors program. Section 10. If a property owner subject to these rates and charges believes that payment of the rates and charges for Fiscal Year 2021-22 would create a hardship for that property owner during that fiscal year, such property owner must appeal the levy by filing a hardship appeal with the TCSD Secretary before 5:00 p.m. on December 1, 2021, pursuant to procedures established by the TCSD, in order to be considered under the hardship appeal program. Section 11. The TCSD Secretary is hereby ordered to transmit or cause to be transmitted to the County Auditor of the County of Riverside, California before August 10, 2021, the Report and the property tax roll with such rates and charges enumerated for each parcel not N exempt there from; and the County Auditor is hereby designated, required, empowered, authorized, instructed, directed and ordered to make collection of such rates and charges as shown on that roll and to perform any and all duties necessary therefore. Section 12. Pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, the levy and collection of these rates and charges is exempt from CEQA pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 21080(b)(8) and Section 15273 of the State Guidelines because the rates and charges are necessary to maintain existing improvements within the TCSD. Section 13. The District Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Zak Schwank, President 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. CSD 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary FXHIRIT A PROJECT SUMMARY TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT On January 28, 2014, Albert A. Webb Associates was retained by the City of Temecula to prepare the Annual Levy Report for the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) for Fiscal Year 2021-22. Pursuant to Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 61115, the TCSD has the power to levy and collect rates and charges in order to carry on its operations and to provide the services and facilities furnished by it. The levy and collection of the rates and charges is accomplished by the identification and description of each parcel within a specific Service Level. A Service Level is a defined area that provides a specific service, operation and maintenance and/or program to only those parcels contained within that service level boundary. The TCSD is currently composed of four (4) Service Levels, as described below: Service Level B — Residential Street Lights. Operations, maintenance, utility costs and administration of all residential streetlights. 2. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping and Slope Maintenance. Operations, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration for all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the TCSD. 3. Service Level D — Recycling and Refuse Collection. Operations and administration of the recycling and refuse collection program for single-family residential dwellings. 4. Service Level R — Unpaved Road Maintenance. Maintenance of unpaved streets and roads. The Financial Analysis contained herein contains each Service Level including their totals for Fiscal Year 2021-22 as follows: Service Level B Service Level C Service Level D Service Level R TOTAL TCSD BUDGET *Single Family Residential SERVICE LEVEL Rate RI in(C FT $640,767.36 $25.68/SFR* $1,587,251.16 Variable $8,911,737.24 $311.73 $0 $0 $11,139,755.76 The Levy and Collection amounts for all non-exempt parcels within the TCSD for the Fiscal Year 2021-22 are as shown on the Levy Roll on file with the City Clerk/District Secretary. Webb MUNIC-IIIAL t-Ii Engineer's Annual Levy Report Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Temecula Community Services District Service Levels 6, C, R and Recycling & Refuse Collection Prepared For The Heart of Southern California Wine Country July 2021 Table of Contents Sections Tables Section i. Engineer's Statement i Section 1. Description of Services 1 Section 2. Budgets and Levy Summary 2 Section 3. District Services and Charges 10 Section 4. Changes to the District 15 Section 5. Method of Apportionment 17 Section 6. Tax Roll 20 Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Table 2-3 Table 3-1 Table 3-2 Table 5-1 Table 5-2 Table 5-3 Table 5-4 Appendices Operating Budget Summary for Service Levels B, D and R Operating Budget for Service Level C Year over Year Budget Comparison Service Level B Service Level C Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level R Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection _ 3 4 9 10 11 17 18 19 19 Appendix A. Tax Roll A-1 i. Engineer's Statement AGENCY: CITY OF TEMECULA PROJECT: TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TO: BOARD OF DIRECTORS CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA REPORT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 61115 Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115, this Report is prepared and presented to the Board to prescribe Service Level B, Service Level C, Service Level R and Refuse/Recycling Collection rates and charges for the parcels and territories within the District. A Public Hearing is held each year before the Board to allow the public an opportunity to hear and be heard regarding the District. Following consideration of all public comments and written protests at the noticed Public Hearing, and review of the Report, the Board may order amendments to the Report or confirm the Report as submitted. Following final approval of the Report, and confirmation of the Charges, the Board shall order the levy and collection of Charges for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. In such case, the levy information will be submitted to the Riverside County Auditor/Controller and included as Charges on the property tax roll for the various services provided in Fiscal Year 2021-2022. SECTION 1 DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES of the areas covered and the services provided for the Fiscal Year. The description of services shows and describes the existing improvements and is sufficient in showing and describing the general nature, location, and extent of the improvements. SECTION 2 A BUDGETS AND LEVY SUMMARY by Service Level of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved for the mentioned Fiscal Year. SECTION 3 A description of the DISTRICT SERVICES AND CHARGES by Service Level, describing the method used to apportion the District charges. SECTION 4 CHANGES TO THE DISTRICT contains details of changes that have occurred within the District since its inception that could affect the levy. SECTION 5 The METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT used to calculate the levy for each of the Service Levels. SECTION 6 The TAx ROLL information. Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 i. Engineer's Statement WHEREAS, upon incorporation of the City of Temecula (the "City"), effective December 1, 1989 voters approved the formation of the Temecula Community Services District (the "District") to provide specified services previously provided by the County of Riverside (the "County") to properties within its jurisdiction. The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City with the City Council acting as the Board of Directors (the "Board") for the District. The District collects property -related fees and charges ("Charges") in order to provide services and maintain the improvements within the District. The District was formed, and Charges were set and established, pursuant to the Community Services District Law, Title 6, Division 3 of the California Government Code ("CSD Law"). WHEREAS, each fiscal year, an Engineer's Annual Levy Report (the "Report") is prepared, filed, and approved by the Board. This Report describes the District, any changes to the District, and the proposed Charges for the fiscal year. The word "parcel," for the purposes of this Report, refers to an individual property assigned its own Parcel Number or Property Identification Number by the Riverside County Assessor's Office. The Riverside County Auditor/Controller uses Property Identification Numbers and specific Fund Numbers to identify, on the tax roll, properties charged for District services. The Charges contained in the Report are based on the historical and estimated costs to service properties within the District. The services provided by the District and the corresponding costs are budgeted and charged as separate Service Levels and include all expenditures, deficits, surpluses, and revenues. Each parcel is charged for the services provided to the parcel. The District provides residential street lighting, perimeter landscaping and slope protection, and refuse collection in numerous residential developments as well as unpaved road improvement and maintenance within specified areas of the District. WHEREAS, Pursuant to Government Code Section 61115 the District has prescribed, revised, and collected rates and charges for residential street lighting ("Service Level B"), perimeter landscaping ("Service Level C"), unpaved road maintenance ("Service Level R"), and Refuse/Recycling Collection services furnished by the District, and has elected to have these rates and charges collected on the tax roll in the same manner, by the same persons, and at the same time as, together with and not separately from, its general taxes in the manner prescribed by Government Code Section 61115. Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 i. Engineer's Statement Now, THEREFORE, I Matthew E. Webb, a Professional Civil Engineer (employed at Albert A. Webb Associates and retained through an agreement between Webb Municipal Finance, LLC and my employer), acting on behalf of the Temecula Community Services District, pursuant to the "CSD Law", do hereby submit the following: The District requested Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to prepare and file an Engineer's Levy Report for Temecula Community Services District (Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) pursuant to the Government Code Section 61115, presenting plans and specifications describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements to be maintained, an estimate of the costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing of the improvements for Service Levels B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection, for the referenced Fiscal Year, an assessment of the estimated costs of the maintenance, operations, and servicing the improvements, assessing the net amount upon all assessable lots and/or parcels within each Service Level and Refuse/Recycling Collection in proportion to the special benefit received; This Report and the information contained herein reflect the proposed budget for each of the various services provided by the District and the rates and charges applicable to those services as they existed at the time of the passage of the Resolution of Intention. Reference is hereby made to the Riverside County Assessor's maps for a detailed description of the lines and dimensions of parcels within the District. The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed Report as directed by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District. Please note that Albert A. Webb Associates provides engineering advice and related consulting services. Albert A. Webb Associates is not a registered municipal advisor and does not participate in municipal advisory activities, and nothing in this Engineer's Report is, or should be interpreted to be, municipal advisory services or advice. Executed this day of 2021. P�pFESSIp�� K A", z w NO . 37385 m a � e/ OF CALII4'!// ALBERT A. WEBB ASSOCIATES MATTHEW E. WEBB PROFESSIONAL CIVIL ENGINEER NO. 37385 ENGINEER OF WORK ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT STATE OF CALIFORNIA Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessments and all matters in the Engineer's Report were made on the day of 2021, by adoption of Resolution No. by the Board of Directors. CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA A copy of the Tax Roll and Engineer's Annual Levy Report were filed in the office of the City Clerk on the day of , 2021. CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA STATE OF CALIFORNIA Temecula Community Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 1. Description of Services The boundary of the District is coterminous with the City boundary and includes all parcels within the City. The District provides certain property related services and improvements consisting of four (4) separate and distinct services referred to as "Service Levels". Each parcel within the District is charged proportionately for only those services attributable to the parcel. Each Service Level has differing costs depending upon the services provided. All parcels identified within a Service Level share in the cost of the service. The costs associated with the service are spread among all properties within that Service Level to which the service is provided in accordance with the Method of Apportionment of the specific service level. Services and improvements provided throughout the District include residential street lighting, perimeter landscape maintenance and slope protection, unpaved road improvement construction and maintenance, and a refuse and recycling collection program. The Service Levels are identified as follows: Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, and administration of residential streetlights. Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping Services include the operation, maintenance, utility costs, improvements, and administration of all perimeter landscaping and slope maintenance areas maintained by the District. Service Level R - Unpaved Road Maintenance Services include the operation and administration of certain unpaved streets and roads maintained by the District. Refuse/Recycling Collection Services include the operation and administration of the refuse and recycling program for single-family dwellings. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary The budgets for each Service Level are shown below. Each Service Level provides different and specific services and improvements to various parcels within the District. Only the parcels that the services and improvements are levied for are included in each of the Service Levels. The "Total Levy Units" and the resulting "Charge per Levy Unit" (shown in Table 2-2), reflect a method of apportionment that most fairly spreads the costs of the services to the parcels in that Service Level. The "Total Levy Units" for Service Levels B, C, and Refuse/Recycling Collection is based on a per parcel count. For Service Level R, levy units are based on a Parcel Development Unit ("PDU"), which is similar to a per parcel count but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. For a more complete description of the methods used for calculating the "Total Levy Units" used for each Service Level, please refer to Section 5, Method of Apportionment. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Table 2-1 Service Levels B, D and R Operating Budget Summary for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022 PERSONNEL Services $0 $60,897 $0 $60,897 Subtotal Personnel Services $0 $60,897 $0 $60,897 OPERATIONS MAINTENANCE 5200'S Repair & Maintenance Facilities 5212 $0 $0 $0 $0 Office Supplies 5220 $0 $0 $0 $0 Printing 5222 $0 $0 $0 $0 Election Costs (Offset by Developer Deposits) 5225 $0 $0 $0 $0 Dues and Memberships 5226 $0 $6,000 $0 $6,000 Postage and Packaging 5230 $0 $0 $0 $0 Property Tax Administrative Fees 5231 $13,265 $15,600 $0 $28,865 Utilities 5240 $0 $0 $0 $0 Small Tools and Equipment 5242 $0 $5,200 $0 $5,200 Consulting Services 5248 $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Outside Services 5250 $0 $20,000 $0 $20,000 Public Notices 5256 $0 $15,600 $0 $15,600 Staff Training/Education 5261 $0 $0 $0 $0 Mileage 5262 $0 $100 $0 $100 Recognition Program 5265 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal5200's $13,265 $62,500 $0 $75,765 Waste Hauling 5315 $0 $8,686,178 $0 $8,686,178 Street Lighting 5319 $475,000 $0 $0 $475,000 Subtotal5300's $475,000 $8,686,178 $0 $9,161,178 Emergency Road Maintenance 5402 $0 $0 $0 $0 Landscape Maintenance 5415 $0 $0 $0 $0 Landscape Rehabilitation 5416 $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal5400's $0 $0 $0 $0 Recycling Programs $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 Subtotal $0 $5,000 $0 $5,000 Capital Outlay $0 $0 $0 $0 Subtotal $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL DIRECT DISTRICT COSTS $488,265 $8,814,575 $0 $9,302,840 EXPENDITURES/REVENUES Contingency Reserve $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EXPENDITURES / REVENUES $488,265 $8,814,575 $0 $9,302,840 CONTRIBUTIONS Contributions from Grants 4025 $0 $0 $0 $0 Operation Income $0 $0 $0 $0 Other Contributions ($152,502) ($97,162) $0 ($249,665) Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COLLECTION/CONTRIBUTIONS ($152,502) ($97,162) $0 ($249,665) Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 3 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Table 2-2 Service Levels C Operating Budget for Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2022 Budget PY 2021-2022 DIRECT COSTS Saddlewood Zone 01 Winchester Creek Zone 02 Rancho Highlands Zone 03 The Vineyards Zone •- Signet Series Zone 05 Woodcrest Country Zone 0. Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,200 $1,530 $2,200 $610 $2,200 $1,200 Utilities $9,600 $8,600 $12,000 $1,600 $11,200 $4,500 Landscape Contract $25,200 $17,400 $19,800 $3,500 $18,000 $9,000 Rehabilitation $0 $10,000 $10,000 $0 $4,500 $10,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $36,000 $37,530 $44,000 $5,710 $35,900 $24,700 INDIRECT COSTS CityAdmin $110 $110 $110 $110 $110 $110 County Fees $307 $390 $348 $204 $238 $245 Special Tax Consultant $500 $500 $500 $200 $500 $350 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $917 $1,000 $958 $514 $848 $70S TOTAL• ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $1,015 $4,012 $2,370 $170 $2,277 $1,855 TOTAL.• EDUs 327 478 408 139 $46.00 223 $175.00 229 FY 2021-2022 Proposed Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $119.04 FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $46.00 $175.00 $116.86 FY 2021-2022 Maximum Rate $116.00 $89.00 $116.00 $46.00 $175.00 $119.05 Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Budget FY 2021-2022 DIRECT COSTS Ridgeview Village Grove Rancho Solana Martinique Meadowview Vintage Hills Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,200 $4,500 $670 $900 $365 $2,350 Utilities $6,000 $33,000 $1,700 $3,600 $1,000 $28,810 Landscape Contract $6,000 $67,200 $900 $3,000 $750 $42,000 Rehabilitation $1,500 $13,000 $1,500 $2,500 $0 $15,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $14,700 $117,700 $4,770 $10,000 $2,115 $88,160 INDIRECT COSTS City Admin $110 $12,677 $110 $105 $110 $6,351 County Fees $224 $569 $189 $173 $143 $609 Special Tax Consultant $200 $1,500 $150 $200 $100 $1,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $534 $14,746 $449 $478 $353 $7,960 TOTAL• ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $74 $4,579 ($113) ($734) ($18) $276 TOTAL0: EDUs 172 $137,025 783 $5,106 111 84 14 831 FY 2021-2022 Proposed Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 FY 2021-2022 Maximum Rate $89.00 $175.00 $46.00 $116.00 $175.00 $116.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Budget FY • COSTS Presley Develop. Morrison Homes Barclay Estates Tradewinds $1,530 $8,500 Monte Vista $100 $900 Temeku Hills Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,000 $798 $6,630 $281 $2,400 $3,060 Utilities $11,600 $22,000 Landscape Contract $13,800 $5,400 $4,800 $11,400 $850 $45,600 Rehabilitation $5,000 $500 $500 $13,000 $0 $12,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $31,400 $13,328 $7,981 $34,430 $1,850 $82,660 INDIRECT COSTS CityAdmin $642 $110 $110 $642 $105 $3,815 County Fees $536 $209 $161 $235 $155 $816 Special Tax Consultant $350 $250 $200 $500 $100 $1,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $1,528 $569 $471 $1,377 $360 $5,631 TOTAL• :• ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $1,296 $877 $1,348 $1,993 ($94) $5,719 TOTAL:00 EDUs 744 166 56 $37,800 216 46 1,343 FY 2021-2022 Proposed Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 FY 2021-2022 Maximum Rate $46.00 $89.00 $175.00 $175.00 $46.00 $70.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Budget FY 2021-2022 DIRECT COSTS Chatemar Crowne Hill Vail Ranch Sutton Place Pheasant Hill Harveston Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,982 $5,471 $12,284 $214 $300 $5,500 Utilities $8,500 $50,000 $43,000 $1,700 $2,400 $30,000 Landscape Contract $30,000 $66,000 $113,436 $1,950 $2,700 $66,000 Rehabilitation $9,500 $36,000 $50,000 $0 $1,200 $40,000 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $49,982 $157,471 $218,720 $3,864 $6,600 $141,500 INDIRECT COSTS CityAdmin $5,320 $12,667 $24,055 $105 $105 $10,145 County Fees $254 $663 $1,176 $153 $355 $1,000 Special Tax Consultant $500 $1,500 $2,000 $100 $150 $1,500 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $6,074 $14,830 $27,231 $358 $610 $12,645 TOTAL• ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution ($1,606) $5,674 ($17,750) $186 $1,190 $7,955 TOTAL0: EDUs 242 1,017 1,769 38 $8,400 1 420 $162,100 1,621 FY 2021-2022 Proposed Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 FY 2021-2022 Maximum Rate $225.00 $175.00 $129.00 $116.00 $20.00 $100.00 Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary Budget FY 2021-2022 DIRECT COSTS Serena Hills Gallery Traditions Avondale Wolf Creek $6,630 Gallery Portraits $500 Repair & Maintenance / Facility $1,651 $100 $400 Utilities $12,000 $900 $4,125 $61,200 $1,020 Landscape Contract $21,000 $750 $3,000 $102,000 $1,100 Rehabilitation $6,000 $0 $0 $27,000 $500 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $40,651 $1,750 $7,525 $196,830 $3,120 INDIRECT COSTS CityAdmin $1,278 $105 $105 $25,303 $105 County Fees $245 $135 $190 $1,167 $138 Special Tax Consultant $500 $100 $150 $2,000 $100 TOTAL DIRECT COSTS $2,023 $340 $445 $28,470 $343 TOTAL•STS $42,674 $2,090 $7,970 $225,300 ADJUSTMENTS Fund Balance Collection/Contribution $1,326 $70 $1,130 $7,674 $786 TOTAL000 EDUs 220 $2,160 8 $9,100 130 1,806 10 FY 2021-2022 Proposed Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $424.90 FY 2020-2021 Maximum Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $417.12 FY 2021-2022 Maximum Rate $200.00 $270.00 $70.00 $129.00 $424.91 Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 2. Budgets and Levy Summary The following Table provides levy information for the various Service Levels within the District, comparing the Budget for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 to the previous fiscal year. Table 2-3 Year over Year Budget Comparison FISCAL YEAR 2020-2021 Total ENROLLMENTS Charge T ota I FISCAL Total YEAR 2021-2022 % Change PROJECTIONS Cha irge Tota I FParcels � Levy Units � Service Level B - Residential Street Lighting Levy Unit Levy Parcels Levy Units per Levy Unit Levy Unit Levy Single -Family Residential 24,612 24,612 $25.68 $632,036.16 24,612 24,612 0.00% $25.68 $632,036.16 Condominium 680 340 $25.68 $8,731.20 680 340 0.00% $25.68 $8,731.20 68-2914 1 25,292 24,952 $640,767.36 25,292 24,952 $640,767.36 Service Level C - Perimeter Landscaping (1)(2) Zone 1 68-2930 327 327 $116.00 $37,932.00 327 327 0.00% $116.00 $37,932.00 Zone 2 68-2931 478 478 $89.00 $42,542.00 478 478 0.00% $89.00 $42,542.00 Zone 3 68-2932 408 408 $116.00 $47,328.00 408 408 0.00% $116.00 $47,328.00 Zone 4 68-2933 139 139 $46.00 $6,394.00 139 139 0.00% $46.00 $6,394.00 Zone 5 68-2934 223 223 $175.00 $39,025.00 223 223 0.00% $175.00 $39,025.00 Zone 6 68-2935 229 229 $116.86 $26,760.94 229 229 1.87% $119.04 $27,260.16 Zone 7 68-2936 172 172 $89.00 $15,308.00 172 172 0.00% $89.00 $15,308.00 Zone 8 68-2937 783 783 $175.00 $137,025.00 783 783 0.00% $175.00 $137,025.00 Zone 9 68-2938 111 111 $46.00 $5,106.00 111 111 0.00% $46.00 $5,106.00 Zone 10 68-2939 84 84 $116.00 $9,744.00 84 84 0.00% $116.00 $9,744.00 Zone 11 68-2940 14 14 $175.00 $2,450.00 14 14 0.00% $175.00 $2,450.00 Zone 12 68-2941 831 831 $116.00 $96,396.00 831 831 0.00% $116.00 $96,396.00 Zone 13 68-2942 744 744 $46.00 $34,224.00 744 744 0.00% $46.00 $34,224.00 Zone 14 68-2943 166 166 $89.00 $14,774.00 166 166 0.00% $89.00 $14,774.00 Zone 15 68-2944 56 56 $175.00 $9,800.00 56 56 0.00% $175.00 $9,800.00 Zone 16 68-2945 216 216 $175.00 $37,800.00 216 216 0.00% $175.00 $37,800.00 Zone 17 68-2946 46 46 $46.00 $2,116.00 46 46 0.00% $46.00 $2,116.00 Zone 18 68-2947 1,343 1,343 $70.00 $94,010.00 1,343 1,343 0.00% $70.00 $94,010.00 Zone 19 68-2948 242 242 $225.00 $54,450.00 242 242 0.00% $225.00 $54,450.00 Zone 20 68-2949 1,017 1,017 $175.00 $177,975.00 1,017 1,017 0.00% $175.00 $177,975.00 Zone 21 68-2950 1,769 1,769 $129.00 $228,201.00 1,769 1,769 0.00% $129.00 $228,201.00 Zone 22 68-2951 38 38 $116.00 $4,408.00 38 38 0.00% $116.00 $4,408.00 Zone 23 68-2952 420 420 $20.00 $8,400.00 420 420 0.00% $20.00 $8,400.00 Zone 24 68-2953 1,621 1,621 $100.00 $162,100.00 1,621 1,621 0.00% $100.00 $162,100.00 Zone 25 68-2954 220 220 $200.00 $44,000.00 220 220 0.00% $200.00 $44,000.00 Zone 26 68-2955 8 8 $270.00 $2,160.00 8 8 0.00% $270.00 $2,160.00 Zone 27 68-2956 130 130 $70.00 $9,100.00 130 130 0.00% $70.00 $9,100.00 Zone 28 68-2957 1,806 1,806 $129.00 $232,974.00 1,806 1,806 0.00% $129.00 $232,974.00 Zone 29 68-2958 10 10 $417.12 $4,171.20 10 10 1.87% $424.90 $4,249.00 Zone 30 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 31 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Zone 32 N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A 0 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 13,651 13,651 $1,586,674.14 13,651 13,651 $1,587,251.16 Service Level R - Road Maintenance Rate Level 1 1 68-2917 1 55 48 $115.26 $5,532.48 55 48 -100.00% $0.00 $0.00 Citywide Recycling/Refuse Collection 68-2916 1 28,476 28,476 $303.18 $8,633,353.68 28,588 28,588 $311.73 $8,911,737.24 (�) The maximum rate per Levy Unit, for Zones 6, 29, 31 and 32 will escalate by the lesser of 5% or the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index ("CPI"). For Fiscal Year 2021-2022 the increase will be 1.87%, the percentage increase in the Annual CPI. Izl Zones 30, 31, & 32 will not be levied for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 as the project areas will be maintained by an HOA. Temecula Services District (Service Level A C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 3. District Services and Charges Service Level B, Residential Street Lighting Service Level B includes all developed single-family residential parcels, condominiums, and residential vacant lots for which the District provides ongoing servicing, operation, and maintenance of local street lighting improvements. The current rate and charges for Service Level B is $25.68 per residential lot ($12.84 per condominium unit within Specific Plans) and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2021- 2022. Table 3-1 Service Level B 04153-00 19872-05 20882-01 21675-04 23063-03 M. 23101-05 23267-02 24135-03 27827-01 29928-00 31053-03 04188-00 19939-00 20882-02 21675-05 23063-04 23101-06 23267-03 24136-00 27827-02 29928-01 31276-00 04457-00 19939-01 20882-03 21675-06 23063-05 23125-00 23267-04 24136-01 27827-03 29928-02 31344-00 06559-00 19939-02 20987-00 21760-00 23063-06 23125-01 23371-00 24136-02 28309-00 29928-03 31898-00 07401-00 20079-00 21067-00 21765-00 23063-07 23125-02 23371-01 24136-03 28480-00 29929-00 32104-00 07402-00 20079-01 21082-00 22148-00 23063-08 23125-03 23371-02 24182-01 28482-00 29929-01 32169-00 08369-00 20079-02 21082-01 22203-00 23064-00 23126-00 23371-03 24182-02 28482-01 30088-00 32170-00 08369-01 20079-03 21082-02 22204-00 23064-01 23128-00 23371-04 24182-03 28482-02 30264-00 32319-00 08369-02 20130-00 21082-03 22208-00 23064-02 23142-00 23371-05 24182-04 28482-03 30264-01 32436-00 11087-01 20130-01 21082-04 22593-00 23064-03 23143-00 23371-06 24183-00 28503-00 30264-02 32436-01 11087-02 20130-02 21340-00 22593-01 23065-00 23143-01 23371-07 24183-01 28510-00 30264-03 32437-00 12189-01 20130-03 21340-01 22593-02 23065-01 23143-02 23371-08 24184-00 28510-01 30264-04 32437-01 12189-02 20130-04 21340-02 22627-00 23065-03 23143-03 23371-09 24184-01 28510-02 30264-05 32437-02 12189-03 20130-05 21340-03 22627-01 23065-04 23143-04 23371-10 24185-00 28510-03 30264-06 32437-03 12189-04 20130-06 21340-04 22715-00 23065-05 23143-06 23371-11 24185-01 28526-00 30264-07 33124-00 12189-05 20153-00 21340-05 22715-01 23066-01 23143-07 23371-14 24185-02 28553-00 30264-08 33125-00 12189-06 20154-00 21340-06 22715-02 23066-02 23143-08 23483-00 24186-00 28553-01 30264-09 34698-00 12189-07 20319-00 21340-07 22716-00 23066-03 23143-09 24131-00 24186-01 28810-00 30264-10 Old Town 13060-01 20643-00 21430-01 22716-01 23066-04 23143-10 24131-01 24186-02 28980-00 30264-11 PM 24387 13060-02 20644-00 21561-00 22716-02 23066-05 23143-11 24131-02 24186-03 29033-00 30264-12 PM 26488 13060-03 20703-01 21672-01 22716-03 23067-02 23173-00 24131-03 24187-00 29036-00 30264-13 PM 27493 13060-04 20703-02 21672-02 22716-04 23067-03 23173-01 24132-00 24187-01 29133-00 30264-14 PM 28122 13060-05 20703-03 21672-03 22761-00 23067-04 23173-02 24132-01 24187-02 29203-00 30264-15 13060-06 20735-01 21672-04 22762-00 23067-05 23173-03 24133-00 24188-00 29286-00 30667-00 13060-07 20735-02 21673-00 22786-00 23100-01 23173-04 24133-01 24188-01 29734-00 30667-01 13060-08 20735-03 21673-01 22915-00 23100-02 23174-01 24133-02 24188-02 29798-00 30667-02 18518-00 20735-04 21673-02 22915-01 23100-03 23174-02 24133-03 24188-03 29798-01 30667-03 18518-01 20735-05 21673-03 22915-02 23100-04 23174-03 24133-04 24232-00 29798-02 30668-00 18518-02 20735-06 21674-00 22915-03 23100-05 23174-04 24133-05 25004-00 29798-03 30668-01 18518-03 20735-07 21674-01 22916-00 23100-06 23174-05 24134-00 25004-01 29798-04 30668-02 18583-00 20735-08 21674-02 22916-01 23100-07 23174-06 24134-01 25892-00 29798-05 30669-00 19872-00 20735-09 21674-03 22916-02 23100-08 23177-00 24134-02 26488-00 29798-06 30669-01 19872-01 20848-00 21675-00 22916-03 23101-01 23209-00 24134-03 26828-00 29798-07 30669-02 19872-02 20879-00 21675-01 22962-00 23101-02 23220-00 24135-00 26828-01 29798-08 31053-00 19872-03 20879-01 21675-02 23063-01 23101-03 23267-00 24135-01 26828-02 29798-09 31053-01 19872-04 20882-00 21675-03 23063-02 23101-04 23267-01 24135-02 27827-00 29798-10 31053-02 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 10 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 3. District Services and Charges Service Level C, Perimeter Landscaping Service level C includes all developed single family and condominium residential parcels and residential vacant lots for which the District provides on -going servicing, operation, and maintenance of perimeter landscaped areas and slopes within the public rights -of -way and dedicated easements adjacent to and associated with certain tracts and subdivisions. The level of maintenance required in these tracts and subdivisions varies depending on operating costs. Thirty-two (32) Zones with corresponding rates have been established within Service Level C. In recent fiscal years, the cost of maintaining the perimeter landscaping for most zones in Service Level C, far accede the maximum assessment that can be levied against the parcels in these zones. As a result, it has been necessary for City staff to reduce services and activities and/or reduce or eliminate the collection of funding for long term repairs, replacements and rehabilitation. The current rates and charges for Service Level C is per residential lot and shall be applied to developed and undeveloped residential parcels within the following Tracts and subdivisions for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Table 3-2 Service Level C KiMUm Rate: 11 11 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Saddlewood 18518-00 18518-01 18518-02 18518-03 Maximum Rate: $89.00 Proposed Rate: $89.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Winchester Creek 20130-00 20130-01 20130-02 20130-03 20130-04 20130-05 20130-06 21340-00 21340-01 21340-02 21340-03 21340-04 21340-05 21340-06 Zone No. 3 Maximum Rate: 11 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Rancho Highlands 20643-00 20644-00 21760-00 22203-00 22204-00 22761-00 22762-00 Zone No. 4 maximum Rate: $46.00 Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: The Vineyards 20879-00 20879-01 KiMUm Rate: 11 11 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Signet Series 20882-00 20882-01 20882-02 20882-03 Zone No. 6 (3) maximum Rate: $119.05 Proposed 14 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Woodcrest Country 21561-00 22208-00 (3) Beginning Fiscal Year 2009-2010, the base rate for Zone 6 was $95.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2021-2022 the adjustment is 1.87%, the percentage increase in the CPI. Rate:KiMUm 11 Proposed - 11 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Ridgeview 20735-07 20735-08 20735-09 20881-00 21764-00 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 8 maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Village Grove 21672-01 21672-02 21672-03 21672-04 21673-00 21637-01 21637-02 21673-03 21674-00 21674-01 21674-02 21674-03 21675-00 21675-01 21675-02 21675-03 21675-04 21675-05 21675-06 Zone No. 9 Maximum Rate: $46.00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Rancho Solana 22593-00 22593-01 22593-02 Zone No. 10 I Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Zone No. 11 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: ... Zone No. 12 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Vintage Hills 22715-00 22715-01 22715-02 22716-00 22716-01 22716-02 22716-03 22716-04 22915-00 22915-01 22915-02 22915-03 22916-00 22916-01 22916-02 22916-03 Zone No. 13 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Presley Development 23267-00 23267-01 23267-02 23267-03 23267-04 26861-00 26861-01 26861-02 26861-03 Zone No. 14 I Maximum Rate: $89.00 I Proposed Rate: $89.00 Numbers:Tract Name: Tract Morrison Homes �� Zone No. 15 I Maximum Rate: $175.00 I Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Barclay Estates :imum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Tradewinds 23125-00 23125-01 23125-02 23125-03 Zone No. 17 I Maximum Rate: $46.00 I Proposed Rate: $46.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Zone . 00 Proposed Rate: $70.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Temeku Hills 23371-00 23371-01 23371-02 23371-03 23771-04 23771-05 23371-06 23371-07 23371-08 23371-09 23371-10 23371-11 23371-14 28482-00 28482-01 28482-02 28482-03 28526-00 29033-00 Zone No. 19 Maximum Rate: 00 Proposed Rate: $225.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Chante mar 28510-00 28510-01 28510-02 28510-03 Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 12 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 20 Maximum Rate: $175.00 Proposed Rate: $175.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Crowne Hill 23143-00 23143-02 23413-03 23413-04 23413-01 23413-03 23413-04 23413-06 23413-07 23413-08 23413-09 23413-10 23413-11 Zone No. 21 Maximum Rate: 00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Vail Ranch Gated Community 28832-00 Vail Ranch Residential 23173-00 23173-01 23173-02 23173-03 23173-04 23174-01 23174-02 23174-03 23174-04 23174-05 23174-06 28480-00 Zone No. 22 Maximum Rate: $116.00 I Proposed Rate: $116.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Sutton Place Zone No. 23 Maximum Rate: 00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Pheasant Run 19872 19872-01 19872-02 19872-03 19872-04 19872-05 Zone No. 24 Maximum Rate: 00 00 00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Harveston 29928 30667 30669 32436 29928-01 30667-01 30669-01 32436-01 29928-02 30667-02 30669-02 32437 29928-03 30667-03 31053 32437-01 29929 30668 31053-01 32437-02 29929-01 30668-01 31053-02 32437-03 30088 30668-02 31053-03 34698 Harveston Ashville 1 31276 Harveston Ashville II 32104 Harveston Condos 32169 32170 Zone No. 25 I Maximum Rate: $200.00 I Proposed Rate: $200.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Zone No. 26 Maximum Rate: $270.00 Proposed Rate: $270.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Traditions/Gallery Homes 29133 Zone No. 27 Maximum Rate: 00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Avondale 26828 26828-01 26828-02 Zone No. 28 Maximum Rate: 00 00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Wolf Creek 29798 29798-01 29798-02 29798-03 29798-04 29798-05 29798-06 29798-07 29798-08 29798-09 30264 30264-01 30264-02 30264-03 30264-04 30264-05 30264-06 30264-07 30264-08 30264-09 30264-10 30264-11 30264-12 30264-13 30264-14 30264-15 31898 33125 32319 33124 Zone No. 29 (4) I Maximum Rate: $424.91 I Proposed Rate: $424.90 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Gallery •. (4) Beginning Fiscal Year 2006-2007, the base rate for Zone 29 was $315.00. Each year thereafter, beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zone 29 the maximum rate as approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2021-2022 the adjustment is 1.87%, the percentage increase in the CPI. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 13 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 3. District Services and Charges Zone No. 30 (5)(6) I Maximum Rate: $129.00 I Proposed Rate: $0.00 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: FARM 1 (5) The maximum rate for Zone 30 is $129.00. (6) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Zone No. 31 (7)(11) Maximum Rate: $35.07 Proposed111 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Roripaugh Ranch TBD 7) __i _ Hi n c.�.,...... I_ _, . _ ,. . ._ _,. _ .._ _ _ _ ,._ _... ...... .... ._ approved by the property owners is annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2021-2022 the adjustment is 1.87%, the percentage increase in the CPI. (8) Zone 31 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Zone No. 32 (9)(10) maximum Rate: $802.05 Proposed 1 11 Tract Name: Tract Numbers: Vineyard View 23103-2 3) ri—i—i— ri—I voter IMP-7n(10 rho k— —ro f— 7— 1) u c drAn nn r—k „ r ♦k.—fro, honin in ri—i Voter )nna-7nl n f— 7— 1) rho m r�roc as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5%. For Fiscal Year 2021-2022 the adjustment is 1.87%, the percentage increase in the CPI. (10) Zone 32 elected to have its perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Service Level R, Road Maintenance Service Level R provides funding for construction, improvement, service, and maintenance of unpaved public streets and roads within specific areas of the District. The services provided may include, but are not limited to, renovation or restoration due to damage, flood and drainage control, repairs and re -grading, and upgrades of the existing areas as required for unpaved roads. All parcels identified within Service Level R share in the cost of the services provided. The costs associated with the services are spread among all parcels within various areas ("rate levels") of Service Level R in accordance with the Rate and Method of Apportionment for the service level. Service Level R currently has one (1) active rate level, Rate Level R-1. The area for Rate Level R-2 has been fully paved and therefore an assessment is currently not required. Only the parcels within Rate Level R-1 boundary area will be charged for the costs associated with servicing and maintaining the roads and streets in the area. • RATE LEVEL R-1 — This rate level consists of fifty-five (55) assessable parcels that have direct access to roads or streets that are serviced and maintained through the District. This rate level provides funding for the servicing and maintenance of Kimberly Lane, Greenwood Lane, Liefer Road, Gatlin Road, and Pala Vista. A total of 1.546 miles of roads are serviced and maintained in this area. The current maximum rates and charges in R-1 are $115.26 per single- family residential lot and $57.62 per vacant residential lot. No levy shall be applied for developed and undeveloped residential parcels within R-1 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. • RATE LEVEL R-2 — This rate level consists of forty (40) assessable parcels that have direct access to Santiago Road. This area has been fully paved and no longer requires service under this District. Refuse/Recycling Collection The Refuse/Recycling Collection Service Level provides for the operation and administration of the refuse collection program, including recycling services for all developed residential homes (or "Households") within the District. The rate and charge for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 Refuse/Recycling Collection is $311.73 per Household and will be applied to all parcels that have been identified as developed residential homes. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 14 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 4. Changes to the District Changes or modifications to the District structure, if any, could include but are not limited to, changes or expansion in the existing improvements or in the types of services provided, addition of new services or Service Levels, restructuring of the current Service Levels, inclusion of parcels into the District or Service Levels, or revisions to the method of apportionment. Changes or modifications within the District that may affect the levy are outlined in the following. Notable Previous Modifications to the District Two Service Levels Replaced with a Special Tax On March 4, 1997, the voters of Temecula approved a Special Tax to fund citywide community services. This Special Tax replaced two existing Service Levels, previously charged through the Community Services District. Beginning in Fiscal Year 1997-1998 the below two Service Levels were replaced by the Special Tax and are no longer charged through the District. • COMMUNITY SERVICES, PARKS, AND RECREATION — This service level provided for the maintenance, service, and operation of all public parks and recreation services within the City. • SERVICE LEVEL A, ARTERIAL STREET LIGHTING AND MEDIANS — This service level provided servicing, operation, and maintenance of traffic signals, street lighting, and landscaped medians along arterial streets. Service I evel R As of Fiscal Year 2008-2009, the streets have been fully paved and there is no longer a need to assess for unpaved road maintenance (Rate level R-2). Proposed Modifications to the District for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 The most notable modification to the District for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 is related to the addition of improvements and expansion of existing services as a result of new development. When a new residential tract is developed, the District may accept additional improvements for maintenance and servicing. Along with acceptance of the improvements, the parcels within those tracts would be included in the appropriate Service Levels. The improvements and services for Service Levels B and C are typically tract or development specific and therefore, all parcels within a tract or development would be included in these two Service Levels when the District accepts the improvements. Additionally, individual residential parcels are included in the Refuse/Recycling Collection when a new single-family residential unit is identified, and service is ordered. Service Level B There were no additional inclusions or modifications to Service Level B for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Service Level C The annual revenue collected for the majority of the Zones in Service Level C is not sufficient to cover the costs to maintain these zones. Due to the rising costs, the District has had to reduce services to the maintenance of the perimeter landscaping for these zones. In Fiscal Year 2019-2020 the District conducted a Proposition 218 ballot proceeding to increase the assessment rates for Zones 1, 4, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15, 17, 22 and 27. The majority of the ballots received were in opposition to the increased assessments in all zones, and the increase was therefore not applied. The assessment rates, for 27 of the 29 zones currently assessed in Service Level C, have not increased since the zones were established. Because the costs continue to increase and the assessments have stayed the same, the service will remain limited and may have to be reduced further due to limited annual funds. In Fiscal Year 2020-2021 the District terminated the flood channel easements in Zone 7 therefore eliminating the need for maintenance of said areas. This action resulted in the termination of the assessment for only the sixteen (16) parcels affected, effective Fiscal Year 2020-2021. In December of 2020, the District initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the maintenance services of the landscape areas in Service Level C. The new maintenance contract that was awarded and approved by the Board resulted in a reduction in the budgeted maintenance cost for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. The new contract is effective July 1, 2021. There are no new inclusions to Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping) proposed for the Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 15 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 4. Changes to the District Service Level R There are no new inclusions to Service Level R (Road Maintenance) proposed for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. No levy shall be applied for developed and undeveloped residential parcels within R-1 for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Due to feedback from residents within Service Level R who attended a meeting held by the City on June 17, 2021, the City will continue maintaining the roads for Service Level R and resume levying the properties within the boundaries of the Service Level commencing Fiscal Year 2022-2023. Refuse/Recycling Collection A total of approximately 112 newly developed residential parcels have been identified and added to Refuse/Recycling Collection for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. These new residential parcels are identified each year and included in Refuse/Recycling Collection based upon the waste hauler's updated service records. The rate for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 for Refuse/Recycling Collection is $311.73 per residential parcel. For Fiscal Year 2020- 2021, the rate for this service was $303.19. For more information, please refer to Section 2, Budgets and Levy Summary. The costs for the District represent actual service costs, as provided in the City's Franchise Agreement with CR&R Waste Services. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 16 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 5. Method of Apportionment Method of Apportionment The cost to provide services within the District will be fairly distributed among each eligible property. Service Level B (Residential Street Lighting): The following formula is used to calculate each property's Service Level B charges by the per parcel/unit (residential "lot/unit") method. Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) _ (Total Residential Lots + Assigned Condominium Units) = Parcel Charge Service Level C (Perimeter Landscaping and Slopes); and Refuse/Recycling Collection: The following formula is used to calculate each property's charges by the per parcel (residential "lot") method. Total Balance to Levy (Budgeted) / Total Residential Lots (in Service Level) = Parcel Charge Service Level R (Roads): The charge per Levy Unit for Service Level R is based on a Parcel Development Unit (PDU), which is similar to a per parcel charge, but makes a distinction between developed and undeveloped parcels. Parcel Development Units = 1.0 for Developed Parcels Parcel Development Units = 0.5 for Undeveloped Parcels Total Balance to Levy / Total Parcel PDU (in Rate Level) = Parcel Charge The following tables reflect the levy calculations for each Service Level. Table 5-1 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level B Defined as Assigned Condominium Units in Service Level B for which the interior streetlights are privately maintained however, the Assigned Condominium Units benefit from perimeter or collector street lighting funded by Service Level B. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 17 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 5. Method of Apportionment Table 5-2 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level C Residential Lot Zone No. 1 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 2 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 3 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 4 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 5 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 6 (12) 1.00 $119.04 $119.04 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 7 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 8 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 9 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 10 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 11 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 12 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 13 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 14 1.00 $89.00 $89.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 15 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 16 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 17 1.00 $46.00 $46.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 18 1.00 $70.00 $70.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 19 1.00 $225.00 $225.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 20 1.00 $175.00 $175.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 21 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 22 1.00 $116.00 $116.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 23 1.00 $20.00 $20.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 24 1.00 $100.00 $100.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 25 1.00 $200.00 $200.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 26 1.00 $270.00 $270.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 27 1.00 $70.00 $70.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 28 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 29 (12) 1.00 $424.90 $424.90 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 30 (13) 1.00 $129.00 $129.00 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 31 (12)(14) 1.00 $35.07 $35.07 Per Parcel Residential Lot Zone No. 32 (12)(14) 1.00 $802.05 $802.05 Per Parcel (12) Beginning Fiscal Year 2007-2008 for Zones 29 and 31 and beginning Fiscal Year 2009-10 for Zones 6 and 32, the maximum rates as approved by the property owners are annually adjustable by the lesser of the percentage increase in the US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index ("CPI") of All Urban Consumers for the Riverside -San Bernardino -Ontario Area (formerly Los Angeles -Riverside -Orange County Area), for the previous calendar year, or 5%. (13) Beginning Fiscal Year 2010-2011, Zone 30 has elected to maintain its own perimeter landscaping under the existing Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zone will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. (14) Zones 31 and 32 Zone 31 elected to have the perimeter landscaping maintained by a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"). As a result, the Zones will not be levied under Service Level C for Fiscal Year 2021-2022. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 18 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 5. Method of Apportionment Table 5-3 Parcel Charge Calculation Service Level K Property Type and Zone Parcel/Unit x Charge per Family Residential Lot R-1 1.00 $115.26 $115.26 Per Parcel Vacant Residential Lot R-1 0.50 $115.26 $57.62 Per Parcel Table 5-4 Parcel Charge Calculation Refuse/Recycling Collection Property Type (15) 1 Parcel/Unit x Charge per Parcel Parcel Charge Multiplier Single Family Residential Lot 1.00 $311.73 $311.73 Per Parcel (ls) Developed residential parcels identified by CR&R for which refuse collections are available. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 19 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 6. Tax Roll Parcel identification for each lot or parcel within the District shall be the parcel as shown on the County Assessor's map for the year in which this Report is prepared under separate cover. Temecula Services District (Service Level B, C, R and Refuse/Recycling Collection) 20 Engineer's Annual Levy Report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022 APPENDIX A Tax Roll (Under Separate Cover) Webb MUNICIPAL FINANCE Item No. 13 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Authorize Fiscal Year 2021-22 Special Tax Levies for the Community Facilities Districts PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-02 (HARVESTON) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-06 (HARVESTON II) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-01 (CROWNE HILL) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03 (WOLF CREEK) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO.03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01 (MUNICIPAL SERVICES) BACKGROUND: The Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") was created pursuant to a joint exercise of powers agreement between the City of Temecula and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency on April 24, 2001. An Amendment was approved on November 10, 2015 to replace the Temecula Redevelopment Agency with the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, due to the Statewide dissolution of all redevelopment agencies, effective February 1, 2012. In addition, the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Housing Authority were added as parties to the Authority Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement. The special tax levy for each CFD is calculated each year based on the formula established in the Rate and Method of Apportionment (RMA), established when the CFD was formed. The special tax levy funds the debt service payments, administrative costs or municipal services which are detailed in the attached Budget Reports for each CFD. The amount of the levies fluctuate each year due to changes in delinquency rates, debt service amounts, or administrative charges. The special tax levies required for Fiscal Year 2021-22, as calculated by the City's special tax consultant, Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, are summarized in the following table. Issue Issue Issue Outstanding Date Name Amount Amount as of Annual Annual 9/1/2021 Levy Levy Prior Year Harveston $17,310,000 $10,850,000 $1,009,726.94 $1,011,322.22 $1,595.28 CFD O 1-02 Sp. Tax A 8/29/2002 Harveston This is a non -bonded special tax established for the ongoing maintenance $246,730.26 $249,203.88 $2,473.62 Sp. Tax B CFD 01-02 Sp. of Harveston Lake. Harveston U 9/9/2004 $4,845,000 $2,985,000 $315,502.20 $310,528.48 ($4,973.72) CFD 03-06 8/7/2003 Crowne Hill $12,155,000 CFD 03-01 Ser. A $8,240,000 $798,193.66 $795,271.83 ($2,921.83) Crowne Hill 8/24/2005 $3,865,000 CFD 03-01 Ser. B wolf Creek 1/8/2004 $30,990,000 $17,880,000 $1,889,000.46 $1,885,046.68 ($3,953.78) CFD 03-03 Roripaugh Ranch 4/27/2006 $51,250,000 $8,160,000 $745,064.74 $741,019.62 ($4,045.12) CFD 03-02 Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 $42,815,000 $40,360,000 $3,167,456.98 $3,163,013.92 ($4,443.06) CFD 16-01 - Special Tax A 3/16/2017 RorThis Ranch Phase 2 is a non -bonded special tax CFFDD 16-01 16-01 -Special Tax B established to pay for ongoing municipal $0.00 $106,944.57 $106,944.57 services provided to this district. This is a non -bonded special tax 1/8/2019 Municipal Services established to pay for ongoing municipal $0.00 $29,466.42 $29,466.42 CFD 19 O1 services provided to this district. City staff reviews each district throughout the year to consider possible refunding opportunities. The City refunded three CFDs in 2012, saving the property owners 10-16% on their annual levies. Additionally, the City refunded Harveston CFD 01-02 in 2016, Roripaugh Ranch CFD 03-02 in 2017, and Crowne Hill CFD 03-01 in 2017, providing savings for homeowners. FISCAL IMPACT: The calculated special tax levy required for the 2021-22 Fiscal Year is listed in the preceding table. ATTACHMENTS: 1. CFD 01-02 Resolution (Harveston) 2. CFD 01-02 Budget Report— Series A (Harveston) 3. CFD 01-02 Budget Report— Series B (Harveston) 4. CFD 03-06 Resolution (Harveston II) 5. CFD 03-06 Budget Report (Harveston II) 6. CFD 03-01 Resolution (Crowne Hill) 7. CFD 03-01 Budget Report (Crowne Hill) 8. CFD 03-03 Resolution (Wolf Creek) 9. CFD 03-03 Budget Report (Wolf Creek) 10. CFD 03-02 Resolution (Roripaugh Ranch) 11. CFD 03-02 Budget Report (Roripaugh Ranch) 12. CFD 16-01 Resolution (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) 13. CFD 16-01 Resolution (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) — Exhibit A 14. CFD 16-01 Budget Report (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 — Special Tax A) 15. CFD 16-01 Budget Report (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 — Special Tax B) 16. CFD 19-01 Resolution (Municipal Services) 17. CFD 19-01 Resolution (Municipal Services) Exhibit A 18. CFD 19-01 Budget Report (Municipal Services) RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 01-02 (HARVESTON) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 01-02 (Harveston) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello - Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01, there is to be levied a special tax of $1,011,322.22 for Special Tax A and $249,203.88 for Special Tax B on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021- 22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. Special Tax A and B as set forth above do not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and Ordinance No. TPFA 02-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax A levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 02-03 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 01-2 (Harveston Special Tax A)" and "CFD No. 01-2 (Harveston Special Tax B)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 27ffi day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary City of Temecula CFD 01-02 Special Tax A (Harveston) 2016 Special Tax Refunding Bonds Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service 020 Difference Note/Comment ($10,000.00) Item 2016 Refunding Bonds 2016 Refunding Bonds March Interest Due $249,187.50 $239,187.50 September Interest Due $249,187.50 $239,187.50 ($10,000.00) September Principal Due $500,000.00 $525,000.00 $25,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Debt Service $998,375.00 $1,003,375.00 Administration 020 Difference Note/Comment $0.00 $131.62 ($3.94) $16.25 $0.00 ($4,637.00) $0.00 Itern Trustee Paying Agent Rate Actual $3,850.00 Rate Levy $3,850.00 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $6,712.81 Auditor -Controller (per Fund, No enrollment fee) ill $91.17 $87.23 Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $162.50 $0.11 $178.75 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $406.25 $0.25 $406.25 City Administrative Costs $6,162.00 $1,525.00 Administration Expenses $180.00 $180.00 Other Costs Total Administration $0.00 $0.00 $12,940.04 $0.00 $17,433.11 ($4,493.07) Other 020 Levy Difference Note/Comment Item Actual Reserve Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Delinquency Allowance $0.00 $0.00 1 $0.00 5% Delinquency Allowance Met Delinquency Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Less: Prior Year Surplus $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Other $0.00 Tota I s 020 Item Total Requirement Actual Levy Difference Note/Comment $1,015,808.11 $1,016,315.04 $506.93 District Adjustment ($6,069.05) ($4,992.82) ($1,076.23) Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment ($12.12) Total Levy $1,009,726.94 1 $1,011,322.22 1 1 $1,595.28 Note/Comment Bonds call protected until 9/1/2026 Levy % Difference 0.16% Administration %of Levy 1.28% City's % of Levy 0.15% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $2,330,022.32 Levy % of Maximum Tax 43.40% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $10,850,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 2.37% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 3.65% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 1,625 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 1,625 Final Maturity 2036 ") Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. City of Temecula Services CFD (No DSS) CFD 01-02 Special Tax B (Harveston) Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Administration Item �Rate Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) Wr- Auditor-Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 City Administrative Costs Other Costs Total Administration $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94 $162.30 $0.11 $178.53 $16.23 $405.75 $0.25 $405.75 $0.00 L,000.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 L,659.22 $1,671.51 $12.29 Other rr2021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Reserve Adjustment Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Levy $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Delinquency Allowance $0.00 Delinquency Charges $0.00 Less: Prior Year Surplus $0.00 $0.00 Total Other $0.00 $0.00 Totals rr2021-22 Item Actual Levy Difference Note/Comment Total Requirement $246,736.52 $249,203.88 $2,467.37 1% annual increase per RMA District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Enrollment Adjustment ($6.26) Total Levy $246,730.26 1 $249,203.88 $2,473.63 Factors: Levy % Difference 1.00% Administration %of Levy 0.67% City's % of Levy 0.40% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $249,203.88 Levy % of Maximum Tax 100.00% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 N/A FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 1.99% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 2.67% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 1,623 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 1,623 Final Maturity N/A "I Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment Max tax increases 1% per year RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-06 (HARVESTON II) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-06 (Harveston II) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $310,528.48 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-03, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-27 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-6 (Harveston II)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 27ffi day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary City of Temecula CFD 03-06 (Harveston II) Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service 020 Difference Note/Comment ($2,843.75) Item Levy Levy March Interest Due $63,618.75 $60,775.00 September Interest Due $63,618.75 $60,775.00 ($2,843.75) September Principal Due $175,000.00 $180,000.00 $5,000.00 Total Debt Service $302,237.50 $301,550.00 ($687.50) Administration 0202021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Itern Trustee/Paying Agent Rate Levy $2,195.00 Rate Levy $2,195.00 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $6,712.81 $131.62 Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94) Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $126.10 $0.11 $138.71 $12.61 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $315.25 $0.25 $315.25 $0.00 Delinquency Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Administrative Costs $6,162.00 $1,525.00 ($4,637.00) Administration Expenses $150.00 $150.00 $0.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $15,620.71 $11,124.00 ($4,496.71) Other Reserve Adjustment Delinquency Allowance Delinquency Charges Less: Prior Year Surplus Total Other I S0.00 15% Delinauencv Allowance Met I Totals 0202021-22 Item Levy Levy Difference Note/Comment Total Requirement $317,858.21 $312,674.00 ($5,184.21) District Adjustment ($2,333.46) ($2,145.52) ($187.94) Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment ($22.55) Actual Levy $315,502.20 $310,528.48 ($4,973.72) Factors: Levy % Difference -1.58% Administration %of Levy 3.58% City's % of Levy 0.49% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $443,181.75 Levy % of Maximum Tax 70.07% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $2,985,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 2.38% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 3.41% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 1,261 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 1,261 Final Maturity 2034 Ill Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment Bonds call protected until 9/1/2022 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-01 (CROWNE HILL) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-01 (Crowne Hill) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $795.271.83 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-05 the Indenture of Trust for the CFD and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-1 (Crowne Hill)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary City of Temecula CFD 03-01 (Crowne Hill) Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2017 and Special Tax Refunding Bonds, Series 2012 Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service 020 Item Series 2012 Series 2017 Series 2012 Series 2017 Difference Note/Comment March Interest Due $146,000.00 $31,368.75 $139,418.75 $31,068.75 ($6,881.25) September Interest Due $146,000.00 $31,368.75 $139,418.75 $31,068.75 ($6,881.25) September Principal Due $405,000.00 $30,000.00 $415,000.00 $35,000.00 $15,000.00 Total Debt Service $697,000.00 $92,737.50 $693,837.50 $97,137.50 $1,237.50 Administration rr2021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Trustee/Paying Agent Rate Actual $4,200.00 Rate Levy $4,200.00 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $6,712.81 $131.62 Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) ill $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94) Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $79.60 $0.11 $87.56 $7.96 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $199.00 $0.25 $199.00 $0.00 City Administrative Costs $6,162.00 $1,525.00 ($4,637.00) Administration Expenses $160.00 $160.00 $0.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $12,971.60 $0.00 Total Administration $17,472.96 ($4,501.36) Totals rr Difference Note/Comment ($3,263.86) Item Total Requirement Actual Levy $807,210.46 $803,946.60 District Adjustment ($9,011.06) ($8,674.77) ($336.30) Credit due to surplus funds Enrollment Adjustment ($5.74) $795,271.83 Actual Levy $798,193.66 ($2,921.82) Factors: Levy % Difference -0.37% Administration % of Levy 1.63% City's % of Levy 0.19% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $2,003,682.40 Levy % of Maximum Tax 39.69% Series 2012 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $6,250,000 Series 2017 Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $1,990,000 Total Bonds Outstanding Prior to Levy $8,240,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 2.59% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 4.62% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 796 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 796 Final Maturity 2035 t" Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment 2017 bonds redeemed the 2005-B bonds 2012 bonds call protected until 9/1/2022 2017 bonds call protected until 9/1/2022 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-03 (WOLF CREED THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-03 (Wolf Creek) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello - Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 03-02 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-02, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $1,885,046.68 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and Ordinance No. TPFA 03-2, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 03-22 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-3 (Wolf Creek)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary City of Temecula CFD 03-03 (Wolf Creek) 2012 Special Tax Refunding Bonds Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service rr2021-22 Difference Note/Comment ($17,212.50) ($17,212.50) Item March Interest Due Levy $434,143.75 Levy $416,931.25 September Interest Due $434,143.75 $416,931.25 September Principal Due $1,020,000.00 $1,055,000.00 $35,000.00 $575.00 Total Debt Service $1,888,287.50 $1,888,862.50 Administration rr2021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Trustee/Paying Agent Rate Levy $2,445.00 Rate Levy $2,445.00 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $6,712.81 $131.62 Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94) Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $180.60 $0.11 $198.66 $18.06 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $451.50 $0.25 $451.50 $0.00 Delinquency Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Administrative Costs $7,636.00 $4,576.00 ($3,060.00) Administration Expenses $150.00 $150.00 $0.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $17,535.46 $14,621.20 ($2,914.26) Other Reserve Adjustment Delinquency Allowance Delinquency Charges Less: Prior Year Surplus Total Other Totals rr2021-22 Difference Note/Comment ($2,339.26) $1,633.45 ($3,953.78) Item Levy Total Requirement $1,905,822.96 Levy $1,903,483.70 District Adjustment ($16,803.57) ($18,437.02) Enrollment Adjustment ($18.93) Actual Levy $1,889,000.46 $1,885,046.68 Factors: Levy % Difference -0.21% Administration % of Levy 0.78% City's % of Levy 0.24% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $2,756,688.40 Levy % of Maximum Tax 68.38% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $17,880,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 1.55% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 3.04% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 1,806 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 1,806 Final Maturity 2034 (') Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment Bonds call protected until 9/1/2022 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 05-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $741,019.62 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. The Special Tax levy set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 05-1 and Ordinance No. TPFA 05-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax levy shall be used to pay, in whole or in part, the costs of the following items: A. Payment of principal and interest on the outstanding authorized bonded indebtedness. B. Replenishment of the required bond reserve funds, or other reserve funds, if necessary. C. Payment of the administrative costs and incidental expenses of the CFD, as provided in Resolution No. TPFA 05-01 and the indenture of trust for the CFD and the Act. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 03-2 (Roripaugh Ranch)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary City of Temecula CFD 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) 2017 Special Tax Refunding Bonds Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service March Interest Due $178,328.13 $170,728.13 September Interest Due $178,328.13 $170,728.13 September Principal Due $380,000.00 $395,000.00 Total Debt Service $736,656.26 $736,456.26 Administration r02021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Trustee/Paying Agent Rate Actual $6,000.00 Rate Levy $6,000.00 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $6,712.81 $131.62 Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94) Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $50.80 $0.11 $55.88 $5.08 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $127.00 $0.25 $127.00 $0.00 Delinquency Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Administrative Costs $9,110.00 $4,576.00 ($4,534.00) Administration Expenses $215.00 $215.00 $0.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $22,175.16 $17,773.92 ($4,401.24) Totals Total Requirement District Adjustment Enrollment Adiustment ($13,761.85)1 ($13,210.56)1 1($551.29) 1 Credit due to surplus funds Levy % Difference -0.54% Administration %of Levy 2.40% City's % of Levy 0.62% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $1,462,413.85 Levy % of Maximum Tax 50.67% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $8,160,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 2.69% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 2.82% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 508 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 508 Final Maturity 2036 ") Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment CFD is fully developed Bonds call protected until 9/1/2025 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 16-04 and Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $3,163,013.92 for Special Tax A and $106,944.57 for Special Tax B on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. Special Tax A and B as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 16-04 and Ordinance No. TPFA 16-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of Special Tax A and B shall be used in accordance with the eligible uses listed on the attached Exhibit A. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 - Special Tax A)" and "CFD No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2 - Special Tax B)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Maryann Edwards, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) DESCRIPTION OF CFD 03-02 SPECIAL TAXES TO BE PREPAID, AND FACILITIES AND SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT CFD 03-02 SPECIAL TAX PREPAYMENT The special taxes to be prepaid are those being levied for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) on property to be included in the District, with the prepayment to be in an amount as necessary to repay the portion of the indebtedness of such community facilities district secured by such special taxes. FACILITIES It is intended that the District will finance all or a portion of the costs of the following facilities: Butterfield Stage,Road Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from La Serena to Rancho California Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signals including a new traffic signal at La Serena and signal modifications at Rancho California Road, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road. Nicolas Road Nicolas Road BSR to the Easterly Metropolitan Water District (MWD) RlW: Improvements include grading right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, underground sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. Nicolas Road from the Easterly MWD R/W to Liefer Road including construction of Calle Garisol realignment to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading partial right-of-way (40' travel way) with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, utility relocations, traffic detour, split rail fence, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, sewer, storm drain, bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek (including channel lining and transition structure to bridge), access road, exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. 166dir the penalty o P.01 ry, 1r%at the above and Iq Llg6ng is a uue'artd'corteci. ,ai,an A-1 ongioal oil Ce ii ijn the r rlordsot Iris City or Temecula;. I day of -' ,, 20 r RAND I JO OLsoN, JD.:MMC, CITY CL RK Yi Long'Vallgy'Channel`. Long Valley Channel from BSR to the Easterly Project Boundary: Improvements include grading of channel, flow -by detention basin, construction of drop structures, trapezoidal channel lining, transition structures to Butterfield Stage Road Bridge, rip -rap, grading and paving of access roads, fencing, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Long Valley Channel. Santa Gertrudis Creek Santa Gertrudis Creek from the Habitat Area to the exit channel at MWD RAW: Improvements include a flow -by detention basin, headwalls, trapezoidal channel lining and transition structures; grading, fencing and paving for access roads; desilting and detention basins, rip -rap protection, rip -rap dissipaters, berms, grading of exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Santa Gertrudis Creek. EnvironmentaWitigation Mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements: Creation of 8.2 acres of habitat within open space to include grading, access road, electrical service, irrigation, plant and seed installation and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete resource agency conditioned environmental mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements. 6 Sports Park Sports Park at the SE corner of the intersection of Loop Road and BSR: Construct 19.7-acre Sports Park including grading, parking, building, lighting landscaping, irrigation, playing fields, basketball courts, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Sports Park. Loop Road Loop Road from North BSR intersection to South BSR intersection (public section only): Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the Loop Road East of BSR. The Facilities shall include the acquisition of right-of-way, the costs of design, engineering and planning, the costs of any environmental or traffic studies, surveys or other reports, the cost of any required environmental mitigation and any required noise mitigation measures, landscaping and irrigation, soils testing, permits, plan check and inspection fees, insurance, legal and related overhead costs, coordination and supervision and any other costs or appurtenances related to any of the foregoing. t hereby ce11!N,i. nder Uie.'Oenalty oLperjury 1,hat the: about~ and:lgregomg �s a Irae and correct copy of an A-2 original on-depo q within ilia r rd§ of the Gity of Temecula, this - day ot- "t Oi L,OLSON' ib, mMc, ci CL RK i� _ SERVICES Is it intended that the District be eligible to fund all or a portion of the costs of the following muriicip!l services: • Public safety services, including police and fire protection, provided to the area within the District. • Maintenance of landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way in the area of the District, including along or near Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, Skyview Park, the Sports Park, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bioretention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation. Maintenance of sidewalks in the area of the District, including Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road. Maintenance of public signage in the District, including signage along Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road. • Maintenance of storm drainage systems within the area of the District, including those along or adjacent to Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection. Maintenance of streets and roadways within the area of the District, including Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping. • Maintenance of street lighting located within the District, including street lights along Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, "Loop" Road, Roripaugh Valley Road, and Fiesta Ranch Road, and including decorative lighting and pull box assemblies. • Maintenance of traffic signals within the District, including traffic signals in or near Butterfield Stage Road, Murrieta Hot Springs Road, and including electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement, Graffiti removal from public improvements within the District. The District may fund any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy, for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the I hereby certify, under the penalty of perjury, that the above and foregoing is a true and correcFcopy',Of an A-3 original on deposi wRhm the r rds of the City of Temecula; this�krday of RANDI J oI SON,_JD. MMC C�RK B •6. y City of Temecula CFD 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Facilities Special Tax Bonds, Series 2017 Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Debt Service 2020-21 2021-22 Difference ($18,287.50) Note/Comment Item Actual Levy March Interest Due $1,243,409.38 $1,225,121.88 September Interest Due $1,243,409.38 $1,225,121.88 ($18,287.50) September Principal Due Total Debt Service $665,000.00 $3,151,818.76 $700,000.00 $3,150,243.76 $35,000.00 ($1,575.00) Administration 020 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Trustee/Paying Agent Rate Actual $2,500.00 Rate Levy $2,500.00 $6,712.81 Consultant Services $6,581.19 $131.62 Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) ill $91.17 $87.23 ($3.94) Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $26.10 $0.11 $62.37 $36.27 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $65.25 $0.25 $141.75 $76.50 Delinquency Management $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Continuing Disclosure/Dissemination $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 City Administrative Costs $6,162.00 $3,051.00 ($3,111.00) Administration Expenses $215.00 $215.00 $0.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $15,640.72 $12,770.16 ($2,870.55) Totals 2020-21 2021-22 Item Actual Levy Difference Note/Comment Total Requirement $3,167,459.47 $3,163,013.92 ($4,445.55) District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Enrollment Adjustment ($2.49) Actual Levy $3,167,456.98 $3,163,013.92 ($4,443.06) Factors: Levy % Difference -0.14% Administration % of Levy 0.40% City's % of Levy 0.10% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $5,987,312.33 Levy % of Maximum Tax 52.83% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 $40,360,000 FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 0.00% FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 0.00% FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied 261 FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 567 Final Maturity 2047 ul Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment Parcel count increased due to parcel splits Bonds call protected until 9/1/2027 City of Temecula Services CFD (No DSS) CFD 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Services Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Administration 2020-21 2021-22 Difference $87.23 Note/Comment Item Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) Rate Actual $0.00 Rate Levy $87.23 Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $0.00 $0.11 $24.09 $24.09 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $0.00 $0.25 $54.75 $54.75 City Administrative Costs $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $1,166.07 $1,166.07 Other rr2021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Reserve Adjustment Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Levy $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Delinquency Allowance $0.00 Delinquency Charges $0.00 Less: Prior Year Surplus $0.00 $0.00 Total Other $0.00 $0.00 Totals rr2021-22 Item Actual Levy Difference Note/Comment Total Requirement $0.00 $106,944.57 $106,944.57 1% annual increase per RMA District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Enrollment Adjustment $0.00 Total Levy $0.00 $106,944.57 $106,944.57 Factors: Levy % Difference N/A Administration %of Levy 1.09% City's % of Levy 0.94% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $106,944.57 Levy % of Maximum Tax 100.00% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 N/A FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 N/A FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 N/A FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied N/A FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 219 Final Maturity N/A "I Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment First year levy Rates increase greater of 2% or CPI per year RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01 (MUNICIPAL SERVICES) THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Temecula Public Financing Authority is the legislative body for Community Facilities District No. 19-01 (Municipal Services) (the "CFD"), created pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"). Section 2. The Board of Directors has enacted Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01 in accordance with Government Code Section 53340 authorizing the levy of a special tax assessment on the property located within the CFD. Section 3. The Board of Directors has completed all steps necessary to levy a special tax assessment in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Act. Section 4. Pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. TPFA 19-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01, there is to be levied an aggregate special tax of $29,466.42 on the taxable parcels located in the CFD for Fiscal Year 2021-22 to be provided by Webb Municipal Finance, LLC, to the Auditor -Controller of the County. Section 5. The Special Tax as set forth above does not exceed the amount previously authorized by Resolution No. TPFA 19-01 and Ordinance No. TPFA 19-01, and is not in excess of that previously approved by the qualified electorate of the CFD. Section 6. The proceeds of the Special Tax shall be used in accordance with the Municipal Services listed on the attached Exhibit A. The proceeds of the special tax levy shall be used as set forth above, and shall not be used for any other purpose. Section 7. The Auditor -Controller of the County is hereby directed to enter the installment of the special tax for the exact rate and amount of the special tax levied in accordance with this resolution for each lot or parcel of land affected in a space marked "CFD No. 19-01 (Municipal Services)" on the next County assessment roll on which taxes will become due. Section 8. The County Auditor -Controller shall, at the close of the tax collection period, promptly render to the CFD a detailed report showing the amounts of the special tax installments, penalties, interest and fees collected, and from which properties they have been collected. Any expenses to be paid to the Auditor -Controller for carrying out the foregoing responsibilities shall be in accordance with a contract entered into between the CFD and the Auditor, pursuant to Section 29304 of the Government Code. Section 9. The Authority Secretary shall certify adoption of the resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 27th day of July, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 271h day of July, 2021, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 19-01 (MUNICIPAL SERVICES) DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES AND RELATED ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES ELIGIBLE TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT SERVICES The services to be financed, in whole or in part, by the community facilities district (the "District') include the following: • Public safety services, including police protection, fire protection and suppression, services, and ambulance and paramedic services. • Maintenance of landscaping in public areas, public easements and public right of way, such maintenance to include but not be limited to maintenance of planting areas, trees, bio-retention filters, multipurpose trails, and the furnishing of water for irrigation. • Maintenance of sidewalks in or near to the area of the District. Maintenance of public signage in or near the District. Maintenance of storm protection and drainage systems within or serving the area of the District including but not limited to storm drain pipes, culverts, detention/desilting basins, manholes, catch basins and drop inlets, cleanout of storm drains and catch basin cleaning and inspection. Maintenance of streets and roadways within or in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to slurry, overlay, curbs and gutters, curb ramps, striping and street sweeping. Maintenance of street lighting located within or in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to street lights, decorative lighting and pull box assemblies. Maintenance of traffic signals within and in the vicinity of the District, including but not limited to electrical, LED replacement, maintenance and replacement. Maintenance and lighting of parks, parkways and open space. Graffiti removal from public improvements within and in the area of the District. • Maintenance of water and sewer systems with an estimated useful life of five or more years and serving the area in or in the general area of the District and owned by the Temecula Public Financing Authority or by another local agency pursuant to a joint community facilities agreement or a joint exercise of powers agreement adopted pursuant to Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code. A-1 The District may finance any of the following related to the services described above: the furnishing of services and materials for the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation and servicing of the improvements, including repair, removal or replacement of all or part of any of the improvements, the furnishing of water for the irrigation and the furnishing of electric current or energy for any lights or irrigation facilities, obtaining, constructing, furnishing, operating and maintaining equipment, apparatus or facilities related to providing the services and/or equipment, apparatus, facilities or fixtures in areas to be maintained, obtaining supplies or appurtenant facilities necessary for such maintenance, paying the salaries and benefits of personnel necessary or convenient to provide the services, payment of insurance costs and other related expenses and the provision of reserves for repairs and replacements and for the future provision of services. It is expected that the services will be provided by the City of Temecula (the "City"), either with its own employees or by contract with third parties, or any combination thereof. The services to be financed by the District are in addition to those provided in the territory of the District before the date of creation of the District and will not supplant services already available within that territory when the District is created. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES The administrative expenses to be financed by the District include the direct and indirect expenses incurred by the Authority and the City in carrying out their respective duties with respect to the District (including, but not limited to, the levy and collection of the special taxes) including the fees and expenses of attorneys, any fees of the County of Riverside related to the District or the collection of special taxes, an allocable share of the salaries of the Authority and City staff directly related thereto and a proportionate amount of the Authority's and the City's general administrative overhead related thereto, any amounts paid by the Authority and the City from its respective general fund with respect to the District or the services authorized to be financed by the District, and expenses incurred by the Authority and the City in undertaking action to foreclose on properties for which the payment of special taxes is delinquent, and all other costs and expenses of the Authority and City in any way related to the District. OTHER The incidental expenses that may be financed by the District include, in addition to the administrative expenses identified above, the payment or reimbursement to the Authority, the City and any owner of land in the District of all costs associated with the establishment of the District. A-2 City of Temecula Services CFD (No DSS) CFD19-01 (Municipal Services) Budget Report Fiscal Year 2021-22 Administration 2020-21 2021-22 Difference $87.23 Note/Comment Item Auditor -Controller (per Fund No enrollment fee) Rate Actual $0.00 Rate Levy $87.23 Auditor -Controller (per Parcel enrollment fee) $0.10 $0.00 $0.11 $6.27 $6.27 Treasurer/Tax Collector (per Parcel fee) $0.25 $0.00 $0.25 $14.25 $14.25 City Administrative Costs $0.00 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 Other Costs $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Total Administration $1,107.75 $1,107.75 Other rr2021-22 Difference $0.00 Note/Comment Item Reserve Adjustment Actual $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Levy $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Delinquency Allowance $0.00 Delinquency Charges $0.00 Less: Prior Year Surplus $0.00 $0.00 Total Other $0.00 $0.00 Totals rr2021-22 Item Actual Levy Difference Note/Comment Total Requirement $0.00 $29,4 66.42 $29,466.42 District Adjustment $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Enrollment Adjustment $0.00 Total Levy $0.00 $29,466.42 $29,466.42 Factors: Levy % Difference N/A Administration %of Levy 3.76% City's % of Levy 3.39% Maximum Authorized Tax (Update Annually) $29,466.42 Levy % of Maximum Tax 100.00% Bonds Outstanding After September 1, 2021 N/A FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 12/10/2020 N/A FY 2020-21 Delinquency Rate as of 4/10/2021 N/A FY 2020-21 Parcels Levied N/A FY 2021-22 Projected Parcels to Levy 57 Final Maturity N/A "I Current Year Per Fund No Charge based upon Auditor -Controller Letter Dated May 14, 2021. Note/Comment First year levy Rates increase 5.6% per year tem No. 14 SUDDlemental Material Item No. 14 - Adopt Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for FY 2019-20 and 2020-21 — Updated Exhibit A Exhibit A 07/27/2021 Case Number Case Status Open Date 1 Balance Due Parcel Number WA21-1350 Legal 04/07/2021 362.00 909290001 WA21-1222 Legal 04/07/2021 982.00 916400043 WA21-1223 Legal 04/07/2021 672.00 916400051 WA21-1219 Legal 04/07/2021 827.00 916400053 WA21-1217 Legal 04/07/2021 927.00 916400064 WA21-1218 Legal 04/07/2021 772.00 916400066 WA21-1244 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 919043003 WA21-1296 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 919152004 WA21-1201 Legal 04/07/2021 334.50 919210015 WA21-1941 Legal 06/08/2021 5,652.00 920212039 WA21-1300 Legal 04/07/2021 672.00 921030012 WA21-1347 Legal 04/07/2021 517.00 921280002 WA521-0463 Legal 03/11/2021 327.00 921411007 WAS21-0479 Legal 03/11/2021 327.00 921433006 WAS21-0493 Legal 03/11/2021 327.00 921614030 WA21-1127 Legal 04/01/2021 337.00 922045016 WA21-1093 Legal 04/01/2021 517.00 1922053047 WA21-1074 Legal 04/01/2021 1,029.00 922072007 WA21-1075 Legal 04/01/2021 417.00 922072020 WA21-1012 Legal 04/01/2021 1,467.00 922190022 WA21-1434 Legal 04/07/2021 8,144.50 922190033 WA21-1459 Legal 04/07/2021 11,227.31 922190034 WA21-0955 Legal 03/31/2021 489.50 922210042 WA21-1330 Legal 04/07/2021 772.00 940300014 WA21-1344 Legal 04/07/2021 682.00 940310014 WA21-1453 Legal 04/07/2021 1,237.00 940320007 WA521-0522 Legal 03/11/2021 327.00 944072002 WA521-0552 Legal 03/11/2021 327.00 944201028 WA21-1410 Legal 04/07/2021 489.50 945090001 WA21-1346 Legal 04/07/2021 644.50 945090007 WA21-1411 Legal 04/07/2021 927.00 945090020 WA21-1412 Legal 04/07/2021 1,237.00 945100005 WA21-0975 Legal 03/31/2021 672.00 957130020 WA21-1233 Legal 04/07/2021 982.00 957170037 WA21-1468 Legal 04/07/2021 799.50 957661010 WA21-1242 Legal 04/07/2021 799.50 959010013 WA21-1203 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 959090012 WA521-0780 Legal 03/16/2021 327.00 960051024 WA21-1087 Legal D4/O1/2021 1,212.00 96601DO07 WA21-1336 Legal 04/07/2021 4,242.00 966090001 WA21-1099 Legal 04/01/2021 814.50 966121017 WA21-1098 Legal 04/01/2021 682.00 966130016 WA520-0572 Legal 04/09/2020 337.00 921411007 WA520-0504 Legal 02/26/2020 337.00 921433004 WA520-2217 Legal 11/12/2020 20,535.00 922130018 WA520-0691 Legal 04/10/2020 337.00 944071013 WA520-0619 Legal 04/09/2020 5,092.75 953090028 WA20-1094 Legal 04/24/2020 337.00 966090001 WA20-0836 Legal 04/23/2020 337.00 966121017 WA20-0835 Legal 04/23/2020 337.00 966130016 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Adopt Weed Abatement Lien Resolution for Fiscal Years 2019-20 and 2020-21 PREPARED BY: Brian Clements, Building Official RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019-20 AND 2020-21 BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is responsible for the abatement of hazardous vegetation for properties that are not cleared of hazardous vegetation during the spring and summer abatement season. On May 1, 2020, City Manager approved an agreement with Inland Empire Property Services to bring parcels with hazardous conditions into compliance with the Temecula Municipal Code. The owners of these parcels are billed by the City to recover the costs of the contractor plus an administrative fee. If the owners do not respond to the billing request, the City places a lien on the property to recover the costs of abatement. All of the owners were properly notified via certified mail, return receipt requested, of the need to abate hazardous vegetation conditions on their properties and were given thirty days to remove the hazardous vegetation themselves prior to the City taking forced abatement action. In 2019-20, forced abatement was delayed on eight properties, resulting in missing the Assessor's deadline. As such, these properties are included in Exhibit A. As per the Temecula Municipal Code Section 8.16.090, the lien process requires that a public hearing be held before the City Council to take comments from the property owners with respect to the costs proposed to be assessed against their properties and to confirm those costs. The Notice of Public Hearing was printed in the Press Enterprise on July 15, 2021. Following the public hearing, the Council must adopt a resolution for the fiscal year which: Confirms the costs incurred by the City in performing the forced abatement work. 2. Provides that the actual abatement costs will become a lien upon the properties, and upon recordation, in the amount of the costs shown on the attached Exhibit A. 3. Provides that the resolution will be transmitted to the Riverside County Treasurer -Tax Collector so the amounts of the assessment can be entered upon the parcels as they appear on the assessment rolls and the costs will be collected on the property tax bill. Upon adoption of the resolution, staff will forward the adopted resolution for filing with the Riverside County Treasurer -Tax Collector and for recording with the County Recorder. FISCAL IMPACT: The recording of these liens will enable the City to recover abatement costs through the County's property tax collection system. The City will recover actual amounts paid out to the weed abatement contractor. The City will also recover an administrative fee placed on each parcel that was abated by the City's contractor. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Exhibit A — Abatement Charges for FYs 2019-20 and 2020-21 3. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO.2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ORDERING CONFIRMATION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS AGAINST PARCELS OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF HAZARDOUS VEGETATION FOR FISCAL YEARS 2019-20 AND 2020-21 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code provides for expedited abatement of hazardous vegetation from vacant lots and parcels. Section 2. Abatement of hazardous vegetation has been completed for each of the parcels as described in the attached list of parcels (Exhibit "A"), at a cost equal to the costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation on each parcel. Section 3. A hearing was held on July 27, 2021, duly noticed in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 8.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code, concerning the costs of abatement of these parcels at which time the Council heard all objections of property owners liable to be assessed for the costs of abatement. Section 4. The list of parcels and costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation for each parcel is hereby reconfirmed and said costs shall constitute special assessments against the respective parcels of land, and are a lien on said land in the amount of the respective assessments. Section 5. A copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the Treasurer -Tax Collector who shall enter the amounts of the respective assessments against the respective parcels of land as they appear in the current assessment roll, and shall collect said assessments at the same time in the same manner as ordinary municipal ad valorem taxes as provided in Section 39577 of the Government Code. Section 6. The costs against any parcel of land listed in Exhibit "A" assessed by this resolution and the lien created thereby shall be deemed discharged and released upon the payment for said parcel of the property taxes for the tax year above -noted. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 27th day of July, 2021. Maryann Edwards, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2021- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 27th day of July 2021, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Exhibit A 07/27/2021 Case Number Case Status Open Date Balance Due Parcel Number WA21-1350 Legal 04/07/2021 362.00 909290001 WA21-1222 Legal 04/07/2021 982.00 916400043 WA21-1223 Legal 04/07/2021 672.00 916400051 WA21-1219 Legal 04/07/2021 827.00 916400053 WA21-1217 Legal 04/07/2021 927.00 916400064 WA21-1218 Legal 04/07/2021 772.00 916400066 WA21-1244 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 919043003 WA21-1296 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 919152004 WA21-1201 Legal 04/07/2021 334.50 919210015 WA21-1941 Legal 06/08/2021 5,652.00 920212039 WA21-1300 Legal 04/07/2021 672.00 921030012 WA21-1347 Legal 04/07/2021 517.00 921280002 WA21-1127 Legal 04/01/2021 337.00 922045016 WA21-1093 Legal 04/01/2021 462.00 922053047 WA21-1074 Legal 04/01/2021 337.00 922072007 WA21-1075 Legal 04/01/2021 417.00 922072020 WA21-1012 Legal 04/01/2021 1,467.00 922190022 WA21-1434 Legal 04/07/2021 8,144.50 922190033 WA21-1459 Legal 04/07/2021 11,227.31 922190034 WA21-1011 Legal 04/01/2021 389.50 922200009 WA21-1057 Legal 04/01/2021 882.00 922200010 WA21-0955 Legal 03/31/2021 489.50 922210042 WA21-1344 Legal 04/07/2021 682.00 940310014 WA21-1410 Legal 04/07/2021 489.50 945090001 WA21-1346 Legal 04/07/2021 644.50 945090007 WA21-1411 Legal 04/07/2021 927.00 945090020 WA21-1412 Legal 04/07/2021 1,237.00 945100005 WA21-0975 Legal 03/31/2021 672.00 957130020 WA21-1233 Legal 04/07/2021 982.00 957170037 WA21-1468 Legal 04/07/2021 799.50 957661010 WA21-1242 Legal 04/07/2021 799.50 959010013 WA21-1203 Legal 04/07/2021 814.50 959090012 WA21-1051 Legal 04/01/2021 644.50 960030013 WA21-1087 Legal 04/01/2021 1,212.00 966010007 WA21-1336 Legal 04/07/2021 4,242.00 966090001 WA21-1099 Legal 04/01/2021 814.50 966121017 WA21-1098 Legal 04/01/2021 682.00 966130016 WA20-0835 Legal 04/23/2020 337.00 966130016 WA20-0836 Legal 04/23/2020 337.00 966121017 WA20-1094 Legal 04/24/2020 337.00 1966090001 WAS20-0504 Legal 02/26/2020 337.00 1921433004 WAS20-0572 Legal 04/09/2020 337.00 1921411007 WAS20-0619 Legal 04/09/2020 5,092.75 953090028 WAS20-0691 Legal 04/10/2020 337.00 944071013 WAS20-2217 Legal 11/12/2020 20,535.00 922130018 Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Applicant: City of Temecula Location: Citywide Proposal: Adopt a resolution ordering confirmation of the special assessment against parcels of land within the City of Temecula for costs of abatement and removal of hazardous vegetation for Fiscal Years 2019-20 and 2020-21. PLACE OF HEARING: DATE OF HEARING: TIME OF HEARING: City of Temecula Civic Center Council Chambers 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA July 27, 2021 7:00 PM Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Community Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to the Code Enforcement Division, City of Temecula Community Development Department, (951) 302-4144. tem No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of June 2021. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed 40 new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted seven (7) Public Hearings in June 2021. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Plan Type June 2421 Long Range Projects 5 Accessary Dwelling Unit 2 Bingo 1 Conditional Use Permit Development Plan 3 Home Occupations 21 Maps 2 Minor Exception 1 Modification 8 Pre -Application 5 Sign Program 1 Temporary Use Permit 4 Wireless Antenna 3 Zoning 2 Tota 1 61 Woodspring Suites (PA20-0072): The City is processing a Development Plan for an approximately 60,600 square foot, four-story, 130 room Woodspring Suites Hotel located on the west side of Madison Avenue between Buecking Drive and McCabe Court. (COOPER) Sommers Bend PA17B & 18B HPR (PAs 21-0507, 21-0508): The City is process a Home Product Review for Planning Areas 17B & 18B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for three (3) unique detached single-family plans with three (3) architectural styles consisting of 62 lots. (COOPER) Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) Solana Winchester (PA20-1371): The City is processing a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350-unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. The City is working with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Ave. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER) Remington Industrial Building (PA21-0384): The City is processing a Development Plan to construct an approximately 33,927 square foot industrial building located at on the southwest corner of Winchester Road and Remington Avenue. (COOPER) Ralph's Fueling Center (PA21-0449): The City is processing a Development Plan for a fuel station consisting of 18 fueling pumps that includes a 174 square foot kiosk located on the southwest corner of Wolf Store Road and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) MS Mtn View Buildings 5, 6,10, & I I (PAs 21-0743, 21-0744, 21-0745, 21-0746): The City is processing Development Plans for four (4) industrial buildings as part of the MS Mtn View Industrial Park. The square footage of the buildings are 17, 503 sf, 19,366 sf, 19,769 sf, and 23,788 sf. And are located along Avenida Alvarado. (COOPER) LongHorn Steakhouse (PAs 21-0793, 21-0823): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 5,710 square foot restaurant with an outdoor patio and a Type 47 (On -Sale General) ABC License located on the former Marie Calendar's site at 29363 Rancho California Rd. (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING Expanded Outdoor Dining and Retail in Old Town: Staff brought this item before City Council on June 8, 2021 for further discussion. The City Council directed staff to extend the temporary program for one year and develop a permanent outdoor dining program. (TOMA, WATSON) Objective Design and Development Standards (LR18-1684): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to update the Objective Design and Development Standards for multi -family and mixed -use residential developments, with the goal of expediting housing production, streamlining approval processes, and establishing the foundation for future regulations and housing laws. Staff is developing Objective Design Standards that will conform with SB 35, and will incorporate objective design guidelines into the City's Development Code. Staff has hired P1aceWorks, to assist with development of our design standards for multifamily and mixed use. On September 28, 2020, staff and Consultant presented six architectural styles to the PC Infill Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo. The Subcommittee agreed with staff s six recommended styles. On October 13, 2020, staff and Consultant presented to the CC Infill Subcommittee consisting of Council Member Naggar and Rahn, the six recommended architecture styles. The Council Members agreed with staffs recommendation to move forward with detailing the styles for the Objective Design Standards. Early December, the consultant provided staff with a first draft of the ODS document. Staff reviewed and provided comments/edits. Currently, the consultant is working through staff s comments from the "Final Draft" review. We anticipate one final review by staff and one review by City Attorney prior to taking the item to the Planning Commission and City Council meetings. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. (TOMA, RABIDOU) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for CEQA evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. (PETERS, TOMA) General Plan Annual Progress Report for 2020 (LR21-0389): State law (Government Code Section 65400 and 65700) mandates that all cities and counties submit an annual report on the status of the General Plan progress in its implementation to their legislative bodies, the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) and the Housing and Community Development (HCD) by April Pt of each year. The purpose of the General Plan Annual Progress Report (GP -APR) is to update the community, City Council, HCD and OPR on General Plan implementation progress. This report is also used as an aid to identify prospective changes, or updates that may be needed for the General Plan. Furthermore, the City has an adopted and certified Housing Element for the period of 2014 to 2021 and pursuant to Government Code Section 65400, is required to prepare and submit an Annual Progress Report (APR) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) and the Governor's Office of Planning and Research (OPR) Department. The APR includes information on the jurisdiction's progress in addressing the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA), including the number of housing units permitted by income level, number of units entitled, and the status of programs identified within the Housing Element. As required by law, the 2020 Housing Element Annual Progress Report will be submitted to HCD on April 1, 2021. The item has been placed on the City Council consent calendar as a Receive and File for July 13, 2021. There are no penalties for resubmitting the annual progress report past the April 1 st date if the City Council wishes to revise the report. (TOMA) Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. (TOMA) Waves to Wineries: Staff is working with the National Parks Service on the Waves to Wineries Trail Plan. The purpose of this plan is to unite Temecula Wine Country with the Pacific Coast by identifying a network of trails along the Santa Margarita River corridor. (PETERS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021 City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021. The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June 2021. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019 for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March, 2021. (WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620 and LR17-1757): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the RHNA process, community engagement, and CEQA. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Mayor Pro Tern Edwards and Council Member Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Youmans, will serve as advisory bodies. Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. (RABIDOU, TOMA, PETERS) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP): Pre -applications are open for the City of Temecula Mortgage and Rental Assistance Program (MRAP). This program will provide rental and mortgage assistance to those eligible recipients who were negatively impacted by COVID-19. The City's consultant is reviewing applications and preparing the first batch of applications for distribution of funds. (RABIDOU, WATSON) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for June 2021 are highlighted in the following table. Building & Safety Statistics June Permits 371 New Single Family Units 36 New Commercial Building 6 Photovoltaic 96 Tenant Improvements 7 Non Construction C of 4 32 Number of Active Plan Checks 119 Number of New Plan Checks 46 Number of Finaled Permits 259 Inspections 3,639 Inspections Per Day 155.4 Inspections Per Person Per Day 41.4 Stops Per Month 1122.4 visitors to Counter 825 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check • Truax Hotel (161,586 sf) • Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 sf) • Town Square Market Place (two buildings at 43,640 sf each) • Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) • Hotel (38,202 sf) on Jefferson and Winchester • Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 sf) • Trinity Lutheran Church Preschool (9,530 sf) • Mountain View — 42589 Avenida Alvarado (14,530 sf) • Mountain View — 42601 Avenida Alvarado (15,895 sf) • Mountain View — 42433 Avenida Alvarado (15,629 sf) • Mountain View Bldg. 9, 42624 Avenida Alvarado (19,919 SF) • Mountain View Bldg. 4, 42613 Avenida Alvarado (33,654 SF) • Mountain View Bldg. 8, 42612 Avenida Alvarado (17,329 SF) Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy • PodTronix, 42355 Rio Nedo (23,800 SF) • Rent A Center, 26451 Ynez Rd. #B (5,000 SF) • Rowhouse Temecula, 33195 Temecula Pky. #A3 (2,500 SF) Tenant Improvement • Epic Dog Academy — 42346 Rio Nedo (5,887 SF) • Mariposa Homemade Ice Cream — 29073 Overland Dr. (1,225 SF) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month of June, Code Enforcement responded to 154 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 209 code cases, conducted 328 inspections, and forwarded 41 referrals. Type of Code Case I June 2021 Abandoned or Inoperable Vehicle 2 Vacant Home / Prop. Maintenance {Infestation/ Mold 17 Business or Horne Occupation w/a license/CUR 6 Trash and Debris / pumping 33 Overgrown Vegetation / Weeds / Fire Hazard 35 Green Pool / Vector Control / Stagnant Water 6 Graffiti 22 Noise/Nuisance/Animal Control 24 Trailer / RV Stored/Boat/Parking 19 Construction w/o Pe rm it/Bu i I d i ng Code 12 Encroach Public ROW /Trash Cans 15 Zon i ng/sign s 21 Public Safety & Health 3 Total Number of Cases 209 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Tracking June 2021 Residential - Default 10 Residential - Foreclosure 19 Residential - REO 18 Total - Residential 47 Commercial - Default C Commercial - Foreclosure 1 Commercial - REO 4 Total - Commercial 5 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0757 42301 Zevo Dr 909-370-017 Jaime Cardenas 06/01/2021 06/03/2021 Meaghan 42301 Zevo PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 Flanagan Drive LLC Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 42301 Zevo ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 42301 Zevo Drive (APN 909-370-017). PA21-0758 30630 Rancho California Rd 921-700-011 Scott Cooper 06/01/2021 06/01/2021 Sandra Hood PK I PALOMAR PL Approved , 503F VILLAGE Modifications Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Yogurt Factory Patio MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) to install an approximately 266 square foot patio located at 30630 Rancho California Road. PA21-0760 41900 Moreno Rd 921-070-025 Jaime Cardenas 06/01/2021 06/03/2021 Kylie Pena Motel 6 PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92590 Operating Planning Letter Case Title / Description: Motel 6 ZL: a zoning verification letter for the property located at 41900 Moreno Road (APN 921-070-025). PA21-0763 28780 Single Oak Dr 921-020-050 Eric Jones 06/02/2021 Randy Shultz SINGLE OAK PL Conditional Out Temecula, CA 92590 DEV Use Permit Case Title / Description: Temecula Hills Christian Fellowship Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit to allow for church services to be conducted within an existing industrial structure located at 28780 Single Oak Drive PA21-0769 29805 Pasada Rd 919-031-003 Jaime Cardenas 06/02/2021 Elizabeth Anne Mark PL Accessory Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Parizeau Spaargaren Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Spaargarden ADU: an Accessory Dwelling Unit application for a proposed 814 square foot garage conversion into an ADU within the existing residence located at 29805 Pasada Road. PA21-0780 960-030-013 Scott Cooper 06/03/2021 Kevin Zenk CRAIG PL Maps Plan Review SWARTS Case Title / Description: Wolf Store Rd. Fuel Station TPM 38189: Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide an existing lot into two separate lots located on the southwest corner of Wolf Store Road and Butterfield Stage Road. PA21-0790 27073 Rainbow Creek Dr 920-054-022 Jaime Cardenas 06/07/2021 06/08/2021 Stephen Todd PL Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Magerkurth Scarpaci-Arton Modifications Case Title / Description: Scarpaci-Arton Addition MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) b add a 186 square foot room addition to an existing single-family residence located at 27073 Rainbow Creek Drive Page 1 of 6 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0793 29363 Rancho California Rd 944-330-011 Scott Cooper 06/08/2021 Nina Raey Land of M&H PL Out Temecula, CA 92592 Investors, LLC Development Plan Case Title / Description: LongHorn Steakhouse DP: A Development Plan for an approximately 5,710 square foot restaurant with outdoor patio located at 29363 Rancho California Rd. PA21-0798 40900 Winchester Rd 910-420-010 Jaime Cardenas 06/08/2021 06/09/2021 Joy Thacker Macy Calif PL Wireless Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Antenna Facility Case Title / Description: Macy's T-Mobile Wireless MOD: a wireless modification application to add fully screened antennas and supporting equipment to the existing wireless antenna facility located at 40900 Winchester Road. PA21-0802 27717 Jefferson Ave 921-400-025 Scott Cooper 06/09/2021 Tito Camacho Jefferson PL Out Temecula, CA 92590 Capital Modifications Case Title / Description: Bastards Canteen MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for the addition of an outdoor patio, revisions to the windows, and additional landscaping located at 27717 Jefferson Avenue. PA21-0804 30643 Temecula Pky 961-410-013 Jaime Cardenas 06/09/2021 06/10/2021 Tam Tran MJ TEMECULA PL Approved Temecula, CA 92592 CO INC Modifications Case Title / Description: JP Handmade Solar MOD: a modification application to install 50 roof mounted panels on the building located at 30643 Temecula Parkway. PA21-0808 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Eric Jones 06/09/2021 Rachel Bruin RANCHO PL Wireless Out Temecula, CA 92592 BAPTIST Antenna Facility CHURCH Case Title / Description: ATC BUP Wireless Antenna Facility Modification: A Modification to an existing wireless antenna facility to allow for the installation of a generator. The project is located at 29775 Santiago Road. PA21-0823 29363 Rancho California Rd 944-330-011 Scott Cooper 06/14/2021 Nina Raey Land of M&H PL Conditional Out Temecula, CA 92592 Investors, LLC Use Permit Case Title / Description: LongHorn Steakhouse CUP: A Conditional Use Permit to allow for LongHorn Steakhouse to obtain a California Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) Type 47 On -Sale General license for a Bona Fide Public Eating Place (Restaurant) located at 29363 Rancho California Road. PA21-0824 45768 Boulder Way 962-480-032 Eric Jones 06/14/2021 Travis Deal Tyron McQueen PL Out Temecula, CA 92592 Modifications Case Title / Description: 45768 Boulder Way Modification: A Modification application to allow for the construction of an approximately 200 square foot observation deck at an existing single-family structure located at 45768 Boulder Way. Page 2 of 6 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0825 41116 Via Halcon 953-030-033 Eric Jones 06/14/2021 Richard Knapp Richard Knapp PL Minor Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Exception Case Title / Description: Knapp Set Back Minor Exception: A Minor Exception to allow for a reduction in the side yard setback. The project is located at 41116 Via Halcon. PA21-0826 42079 Roick Dr 909-321-001 Eric Jones 06/14/2021 Joseph Regency PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Skimming Investments Development Plan Case Title / Description: Dental Office Shell Building Development Plan: A Development Plan to construct an approximately 7,071 square foot two-story shell -building intended for a dental office. The project is located at 42079 Roick Drive. PA21-0833 33320 Temecula Pky 965-410-003 Jaime Cardenas 06/15/2021 Rose Corona Corona Family PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 LTD Use Permit Partnership Case Title / Description: Big Horse Corm Maze: a Temporary Use Permit for an annual corn maze and harvest festival from October 2 through October 31, 2021 from 1:OOPM-5:00 PM Tuesday through Friday and 10:OOAM-5:OOPM Saturday through Sunday on the vacant parcels located at 33320 Temecula Parkway. PA21-0834 28459 Old Town Front St 922-026-044 Eric Jones 06/15/2021 Beth Soltysiak RCM Capital PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Partners Use Permit Case Title / Description: Starpup Coffee Temporary Use Permit: A Temporary Use Permit to allow a dog adoption event to be held on June 26, 2021. The project is located at 28459 Old Town Front Street. PA21-0838 916-400-066 Scott Cooper 06/16/2021 Mark Rosene Harveston SAB PL Out South Development Plan Case Title / Description: Prado DP: A Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres consisting of detached condominiums located at the terminus of Equity Dr. on the west side of Ynez Road. PA21-0839 916-400-067 06/16/2021 Mark Rosene Harveston SAB PL Maps Out South Case Title / Description: Prado TTM: A Tentative Tract Map (No. 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, and two (2) open space lots located at the terminus of Equity Dr. on the west side of Ynez Road. Page 3 of 6 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0840 42129 Dlr Dr 921-730-071 Scott Cooper 06/16/2021 Richard Reaves HYE PL Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Modifications Case Title / Description: American Tire Depot MOD: A Modification to a previously approved Development Plan (PA14-0175) to relocate the driveway approximately 46-feet to the south, moving four (4) parking spaces, and revising the landscape plans to reflect the revised layout. The project is located at 42129 DLR Drive. PA21-0843 27430 Ynez Rd 921-290-014 Scott Cooper 06/17/2021 06/17/2021 Eduardo BTAA Prop Inv II PL Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Galdamez Modifications Case Title / Description: La Vida MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to allow for the installation of three (3) panel antenna and upgrade of existing equipment in an existing enclosure located at 27430 Ynez Road. PA21-0852 40820 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Eric Jones 06/21/2021 07/06/2021 Timothy Temecula PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92591 Maranville Towne Center Use Permit Assoc Case Title / Description: Worship in Temecula Temporary Use Permit: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a Worship Event to take place on July 23, 2021 at the Promenade Mall parking lot adjacent to the former Sears building. The project is located at 40820 Winchester Road. PA21-0854 41845 6Th St 921-070-024 Sara Toma 06/21/2021 Caroline CITY OF PL Bingo Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Hoelzle TEMECULA Case Title / Description: Senior Golden Years Bingo License: a Bingo License renewal for the operation of bingo games for Seniors Golden Years at 41845 6th Street (Mary Phillips Senior Center). PA21-0855 42081 Dlr Dr 921-730-064 Scott Cooper 06/21/2021 Jeannie Chau Diego Dev PL Sign Out Temecula, CA 92591 Program Case Title / Description: Lexus Sign Program: A comprehensive Sign Program (#145) for Lexus located at 42081 DLR Dr. PA21-0858 40770 Winchester Rd 910-420-030 Eric Jones 06/22/2021 Derek Whitmore Temecula PL Temporary Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Towne Center Use Permit Assoc Case Title / Description: Like it Black Coffee Temporary Use Permit: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for coffee to be sold from a trailer at the mall. The project is located at 40820 Winchester Road. PA21-0876 964-640-001 Scott Cooper 06/28/2021 06/28/2021 Dena Upp escrow acct WOODSIDE PL Approved 5074 05S Modifications authorized user Case Title / Description: Sommers Bend PA18A Plan 1 MOD: A Modification (Planning Review Only) for the change in material to the home plus/single care garage front and left elevation for Plan 1 American Farmhouse located in PA18A of Sommers Bend Page 4 of 6 Assigned Approval PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA21-0879 30623 Jedediah Smith Rd 945-160-021 Eric Jones 06/29/2021 Michael A. Richard PL Accessory Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 Perkett Sherman Dwelling Unit Case Title / Description: Sherman Accessory Dwelling Unit: An Accessory Dwelling Unit Application to allow for an existing structure to be converted into an accessory dwelling unit. The project is located at 30623 Jedediah Smith Road. PA21-0880 42101 Moraga Rd 921-310-025 Eric Jones 06/29/2021 Jim Heinrich First Baptist PL Wireless Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 Church of Antenna Facility Temecula Case Title / Description: T-Mobile Wireless Modification Application: A modification to an existing wireless facility consisting of the replacement of antennas and other equipment. The project is located at 42101 Moraga Road. PA21-0881 27941 Diaz Rd 921-040-003 Eric Jones 06/29/2021 Ahmad PRECISION PL Conditional Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Youssufzay PHOTOGRAPH Use Permit Y INC Case Title / Description: Used Car Dealership Conditional Use Permit: A Conditional Use Permit application to allow for a used car dealership. The project is located at 27491 Diaz Road. PREAPP21- 921-280-002 Eric Jones 06/07/2021 Christopher Ridge Park PL Plan Review 0789 Campbell Point Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Wine Making Facility Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow review of a wine manufacturing and tasting facility generally located approximately 300 feet east of the Vincent Moraga Drive and Felix Valdez Avenue intersection (APN:921-280-002) PREAPP21- 27496 Commerce Center Dr 921-480-055 Eric Jones 06/08/2021 Bret Scott 22334 Lupine PL Cancelled 0792 Temecula, CA 92590 Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Willow Creek Archery Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to allow for the review of a proposed archery store with practice lanes located at 27496 Commerce Center Drive. PREAPP21- 41830 6Th St 922-022-018 Eric Jones 06/09/2021 John Goga KATHRYN PL Plan Review 0810 Temecula, CA 92590 KINCAID Pre -Application Case Title / Description: 6th Street B&B Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review a proposed bed and breakfast within an existing single-family home located at 41830 Sixth Street. PREAPP21- 39970 Cantrell Rd 957-130-020 Eric Jones 06/10/2021 Corrine Berge THOMAS PL Plan Review 0815 Temecula, CA 92591 GROPP Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Personal Residence Plus Preapp: a preapplication to review a proposed single family home, guest home and utility building at the existing property located at 39970 Cantrell Road (APN 957-130-020). Page 5 of 6 Assigned PA Number Project Address APN Planner Apply Date Approval Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PREAPP21- 0816 945-100-005 Scott Cooper 06/10/2021 Case Title / Description: Hidden Hills Estates Pre-App: A Pre -Application for 30 single family lots on 31.86 acres located on the north side of Santiago Rd approximately 200 feet east of John Warner Rd. Lawrence (Larry) Slusser South Point Development Inc PL Out Pre -Application Page 6 of 6 Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Report. Wendy Miller, Management Analyst That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Service Calls June 2021 Of T E1114 G Commercial Fire 1 • False Alarms 74 Haz Mat 2 Medical 574 % 1989 Multi-Fam 0 IINEW p4' Other Fire 2 Other Misc 7 Public Assist 25 Residential Fire 5 do Rescue 1 w Ringing Alarm 6 `--_- Standby 10 Traffic Collision 72 WildlandNehicle Fire 6 Total 785 T F MF + w ��..�� • •• • w s � . . •• w + • • E • .4& •��� $ si • .so I opm • •• •. _. o loose �''il�' .a. + �e • 94— l�/i' • • • • •4' • •. r'r me � -1J` * • b;r,4 • i r• . 'i PA V 8 A VALLE v �, rr a rw • + • nY- . i 10 i b le i� ill- + ' •$ • • 1�' .ice •.••, gr wb �... �� �0. +`' _ • .KClHANC' % 51N0'NiD RV, / n\ 4 City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections Of TEn�EC,a — June 2021., Plan Review and Inspections June Year to Date .� Plan Review 446 2329 a 1989 � Construction Inspections 451 2040 +NEW OVVO Annual Inspections 609 3698 Counter/Public Inquiries 12 34 E. ' •! j ' 3167 tem No. 17 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Zachary Hall, Chief of Police DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Temecula Sheriff's Monthly Report (June 2021) PREPARED BY: Steve DaSilva, Lieutenant RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file. The following report reflects the activity of the Temecula Sheriff's Department for the month of May 2021. PATROL SERVICES Overall calls for police service 7,041 "Priority One" calls for service 43 Average response time for "Priority One" calls 6.14 VOLUNTEERS Chaplain 10 Community Action Patrol (CAP) hours 990 Reserve officer hours (patrol) 87 Explorer 115 Station/Administration 34 Total Volunteer hours 1236 OLD TOWN STOREFRONT Total customers served 239 Fingerprints/Live Scans 126 Police reports filed 13 Citations signed off 12 Total receipts $3,646 CRIME PREVENTION Crime prevention/Neighborhood watch meetings 0 Safety presentations/Training 1 Special events 5 Residential/Business security surveys conducted 0 Residences/Businesses visited for past crime follow-up 0 Station Tours 0 Planning Review Projects 6 Temp Outdoor Use Permits 3 SPECIAL TEAMS (HOMELESS OUTREACH TEAM) On sight felony arrests 3 On sight misdemeanor arrests 22 Felony arrest warrants served 4 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 84 Area Checks 173 Camp Checks 95 Pedestrian Checks 122 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 30 Outreach attempts / Success 15 / 3 SPECIAL TEAMS (Special Enforcement Team) On sight felony arrests 22 On sight misdemeanor arrests 47 Felony arrest warrants served 17 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 38 Follow-up investigations / search warrants 5 Parole/Probation Searches 9 Pedestrian Checks 40 Traffic StopsNehicle Checks 77 Marijuana Dispensary Checks 0 SPECIAL TEAMS (Metro District Team) On sight felony arrests 5 On sight misdemeanor arrests 29 Felony arrest warrants served 1 Misdemeanor arrest warrants served 4 Bar checks 70 Business checks 30 D.U.I. Arrests 29 Traffic/Parking citations 62 TRAFFIC Citations issued for hazardous violations 751 Non -hazardous citations 115 Parking citations 218 Stop Light Abuse/Intersection Program (S.L.A.P.) citations 43 Seatbelts 11 Cell Phone Cites 122 Injury collisions 34 D.U.I. Arrests 35 Grant funded D.U.I. Traffic safety checkpoints / saturation enforcement 4 Grant funded traffic click it or ticket / traffic enforcement 3 INVESTIGATIONS Beginning Caseload 156 Total Cases Assigned 40 Total Cases Closed 63 Search Warrants prepared/served 18 Arrests 3 Out of Custody Filings 2 1' ; i7ulil12I:�7ilu/:vilil m.30-1 Calls for service 88 Felony arrest/filings 1 Misdemeanor arrest/filings 5 Traffic Citations 5 Total customers served 936 Fingerprints/Live Scans 247 Total receipts $7,587 SCHOOL RESOURCE OFFICERS Felony arrests 0 Misdemeanor arrests 0 Reports 2 Citations 0 Meetings/Presentations 10 * * *Through June 14, 2021 * * * Incident summaries: Calls for Service: Officers responded to 7,041 calls for service in June 2021. Below is a snapshot of those calls. This is not a comprehensive list. Please be mindful these calls can range from several minutes to several hours, to investigate at the patrol level. Many of these investigations are forwarded to the Detective Bureau for even further investigation and follow-up. Call Type Number of Calls Call Type Number of Calls Arson 1 Hazard 6 Assault with a Deadly Weapon 1 Homeless Outreach 12 Battery (Fights) 46 Illegal Dumping 2 Burglary -Commercial 30 Indecent Exposure 4 Burglary -Residential 4 Juvenile -incorrigible 20 Burglary -Vehicle 36 Juvenile -Run Away 37 Child Abuse 13 Juvenile -Located 2 Domestic Violence Abuse 16 Juvenile -Medical Aid 4 Fraud 54 K9 Uses 10 Homicide 0 Keep the Peace 39 Rape 2 Mail Theft 9 Robbery 4 Marijuana Cultivation Theft- PettyUnder $950 94 Mentally Disturbed Person (5150L 54 Theft -Grand (over $950) 41 Missing Adult or Child 12 Narcotics Violations 114 Person Down 33 Alarm -Audible 420 Prowler 1 Alarm -Robbery Receiving Stolen Property 1 Alarm -Silent 16 Restraining Order Violation 8 Animal Cruelty 17 Sex Offender Registrants Annoying Phone Calls 26 Sexual Battery 3 Area Checks 880 Shooting at a Dwelling 10 Assist Other Department 138 Stolen Vehicle 38 Brandishing a Firearm 4 Stolen Vehicle Recovery 11 Check the Welfare 118 Suicide threat 14 Child Stealing 29 Suspicious Person 151 Criminal Threats 2 Suspicious Vehicle 64 Disoriented Subject 13 Trespassing 84 Disturbing the Peace 418 Unattended Death 11 Drunk in Public 77 Vandalism 37 Extra Patrol Requests Vehicle Embezzlement 5 Fireworks 15 Vicious Dog 2 Follow -Up Investigations/Patrol 261 Warrant Service 260 911 Calls 753 Item No. 18 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: July 27, 2021 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new low -flow crossing of Murrieta Creek. Cost: $2,387,000 Status: In design until March 2022. Design and environmental are expected to last 24 months. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $11,457,436 Status: Phase 1 design and Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities include consultant preparation of 60% plans, and several engineering and environmental studies. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $137,356,246 Status: Currently in design. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $8,382,225 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — March 2022. Current activities include roadway design, structures design, noise study report, drainage studies, design standard decision document, historical resources compliance report, and archaeological survey report. Interstate-15 / State Route 79 South Ultimate Interchange, PW04-08 Description Construction of ramp system that will improve access to Interstate 15 from Temecula Parkway / State Route 79 South. Cost: $52,025,657 Status: Construction of the project has been accepted as complete by the City and Caltrans. Per a 3-year Landscape Maintenance Agreement with Caltrans, the City will maintain the interchange site from June 30, 2020 through June 30, 2023. The City is working with Caltrans on the relinquishment of the interchange right-of-way to the State inventory. Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $14,307,394 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019 meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA provided comments to the JPR application on 7/30/2020. NEPA approval is anticipated in July/August of 2021, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is underway and expected to be complete in July 2021. CEQA is pending results of Temecula Creek monitoring and review by RCA. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management has proposed reducing the curb to curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff will address this with Caltrans HBP Program as the bridge width is the same as original approved grant application. 6 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $1,340,400 Status: Design is at 60%. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Ynez Road (Winchester to Date), Equity Drive, County Center Drive Loop, and Winchester Road (Nicolas to Easterly City Limits), PW18-01 Description: Rehabilitation of Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Date Street, Equity Drive and County Center Drive loop, and Winchester Road from Nicolas Road to easterly City Limits. Cost: $1,105,000 Status: Construction is complete. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — West Side Business Park Area, PW19-17 Description: Rehabilitation of Zevo Drive, Rio Nedo Road, Avenida Alvarado, Via Dos Picos, Business Park Drive, Del Rio Road, Calle Cortez, Las Haciendas Street, Enterprise Circle North, and Via Montezuma from Murrieta Creek to Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $1,900,000 Status: Construction is Complete. Pavement Rehabilitation Program — Butterfield Stage Road and Pauba Road, PW19-08 Description: Rehabilitation of Butterfield Stage Road, south of Rancho California Road to De Portola Road and Pauba Road, from Margarita Road to Butterfield Stage Road. Cost: $3,321,600 Status: Currently in construction, July 2021 to February 2022. 3 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive. Cost: $346,646.50 Status: Project is currently in design. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access of the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,347,674 Status: City Council awarded the construction contract at the meeting on May 25, 2021. Construction started June 21, 2021. Construction duration is six months. 4 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Citywide — Concrete Repairs, PW20-10 Description: Remove and replace concrete improvements including, but not limited to curb & gutter, sidewalk, ADA access ramp, commercial drive approach, cross gutter, and curb outlet top of structure. Cost: $157,789 Status: Construction contract awarded to IE Engineering. Construction started on March 22, 2021. Project is near completion Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $5,000,000 Status: Phase 1 needs design initiated. Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, irrigation, and transportation art between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $3,533,483 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — December 2021. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, Design Engineering Evaluation Report, Project Specific Maintenance Agreement, Landscape Maintenance Agreement, Transportation Art / Community ID Proposal, and Copyright and Waiver of Moral Rights in Artwork. 5 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $10,656,507.91 Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020 to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021 City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Design phase is underway. The first design development submittal has been received and is currently under review by staff and the consultant. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in December of 2022 with a grand opening in early 2023. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows. Cost: $1,000,000 Status: Project design initiated. Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $6,288,595 Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State SB1 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Completion is scheduled for October 2021. 11 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Cost: $2,716,764 Status: The project is in design. 100% PSE expected in December 2021. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18 Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive. Cost: $442,077 Status: Project is currently in design. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $467,403 Status: Project is currently in design. 7 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks - Old Town Improvements (Fifth Street from Front Street to Murrieta Creek), PW20-02 Description: Curb and sidewalk improvements on the north side Fifth Street, between Front Street and Murrieta Creek. Improvements include grind/overlay of entire street, tree grates, bollards, street lights. Cost: To be determined Status: Authorization to Bid was received at the June 8, 2021 City Council meeting. Project is bidding. Bid opening date is August 3, 2021. !- City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Preparation of the environmental document is underway. Redesign started in February of 2020. CEQA IS/MND 30 day public review period ended on May 27, 2021 CEQA approval and authorization to bid is scheduled for the July 27, 2021 City Council meeting. Construction is expected to begin in September 2021. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Butterfield Stage Park and Vail Ranch Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $5,157,649 Status: Playground renovations & replacements projects for FY20/21 are completed. FY 21/22 projects are being designed. pi City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS (Continued) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of the restroom building expansion, including adding stalls and urinals. It also includes renovating the snack bar and enlarging the storage case. Cost: $1,120,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Construction is anticipated in Summer 2021. Sports Field Lighting — Light Emitting Diode (LED) Conversion Description: Replacement of aging sports field lighting components with new LED technology at various sports parks. Cost: $222,546.70 Status: LED retrofit installation at Michael `Mike Naggar Community Park tennis/pickleball courts and hockey rinks is schedule for July 2021 10 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS Hilton Garden Inn Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of an approximately 66,991 square foot, three-story, 104 room Hilton Garden Inn Hotel with underground parking and additional off -site parking located approximately north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued October 4, 2019. Ongoing review of project by the Land Development division. Rancho Soleo (Pechanga Parkway and Loma Linda Road) Description: Grading plan to allow for the final map and construction of a 245-unit multi -family development. Status: Permit issued October 16, 2018. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Project is being phased at this time. Construction of Friendship Park (formerly known as Pala Park) has begun as of January 11, 2021. It is anticipated the development will reach 25% occupancy by Spring of 2021. Sommers Bend (formerly Roripaugh Ranch) Description: Land Development oversight of the following submittals in plan check: Final Map reviews, Community Sports Park Improvement Plan, Sommers Bend — Rough Grading Plan; Street Improvement Plan; Storm Drain Improvement Plan; Street Light Plan; Signing & Striping Plan. Status: Grading Permit issued September 27, 2018. The Loop Road (Sommers Bend) is completely paved with streetlights installed. The Community Sports Park has kicked off construction in June 2020. Models in three tracts are under construction. The Sommers Bend recreation center is also under construction. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Models are open. Production homes are under construction. Staybridge Suites Description: Grading plan to allow for an approximately 90,832 square foot, 4-story, 125-room Staybridge Suites hotel located at 27500 Jefferson Avenue. Status: Permit issued March 11, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. 11 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT July 27, 2021 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Temecula Village Description: Grading plan to allow for the construction of a 160-unit apartment community located on the south side of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive. Status: Permit issued June 27, 2019. Ongoing review and inspections of project by the Land Development division. Traffic signal has been installed at Via Portofino. 12 REQUESTS TO SPEAK AND ELECTRONIC COMMENTS SUBMITTED FOR THE RECORD REQUEST TO SPEAK /� CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 �\ Date: A Z 1 / i I wish to speak on. 0 Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: REbb Cnwn ISSI on ❑ Agenda Item No. For 0 Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk ro for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name_ (,'hrlshy1c Mas� Phone Number: Tel'n P (A. Lk Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to speak on: Publics Com(mejntt Circle One: CITY Subject: -A- Agenda Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA( Date: ICILI CSD I SARDA/THA/TPFA ;n (the hmi q' hme mvynn(p For X] Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk 2Ljgr to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. '-' ����Email address: III, OL If representjng an please give Please note that all information presented at a Ali information pn Council meeting becomes public record. i is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK �` CITY OF TEMECULA:� wag Date: I wish to speak on: Rr Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. 1 (� Name: �"Ce rt � Lg~,� a--I-� Phone Number: Address � '• ci a s 4 2 Emailaddress: (& , If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 19� 27 2oZ Dale: I wish to speak on: 0/Public ggmmmye�ntt Cirir%clee O�n�e::tit 511i;711 fl / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: f� f ,CJ� / (.![/YY/ 4 ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk ro for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk erior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. ,11 /non Name: (/YGY/ U 4 Phone Number: Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. I wish to ask on: wish Comment Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA M. Dale: 2 / Circle One: ITY COUNCIL / D / SARDA / THA / TPFA For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk Prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk ro for to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. / ,, 1 ,/ �[ Name: A! /b % , -% A fib )Phone Number: - Address: / VFVL 1 (II -/ h d— % 2" k-A Email address: If you are representing an or group, please give the name: Please note that all Information presented at a City Council meeting becomes Public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 011r"W 0 Date: JUI� f �wL2 I 1 wish to speak on: fo Public Comment Circle One: CITYCOUNC CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk Drier to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the re�,c1ordd./,,,,'1,, /�, / Name: illy Nt'1fIVyk G-W-CAAAA) Phone Number: Addre: Email If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that aft information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK /� CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 Date: Z' I wish to speak on. DI -Public %Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSID / SA,RRDlA / THA / TPFA Subject ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk grior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the reco,(M.,.yP - NamePhone Number: / I_ you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all Information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 6 Oz z Date: I wish to speak on: PPublic Comment CircleOne: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp ier to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. /� Name: TO.!CO ' � Phone Number: 2/ Email address C/� you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. GJ I wish to speak on: FPublic Comment Circle � Subject: 4--E / , / rc"2 ❑ Agenda Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date. SARDA/THA/TPFA For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. n - Phone Number: / Address: Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1 r 1 a Date: -7 1 wish to speak on: E/Public Comment Circle One. CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rb for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk brlor to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: '—f)M A^�f'S ot..: Phone Number Address Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. �� REQUEST TO SPEAK 1 CITY OF TEMECULA iw9 1 Date: 7 27 20 2 1 I wish to s ask on: ;7PPublic Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: V=.0 ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk Prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: en WkOMB-L Phone Number: Address: Email address:_ ` If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. Ali information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK 1� CITY OF TEMECULA \ flY Date: J'J R7, zo;Xl I wish to speak on. ® Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk ro for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Address: TFM= CVkA 9d592 Email address: If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. _ REQUEST TO SPEAK < CITY OF TEMECULA\2 1989 J Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk ro for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk RE!2E to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the reword. /r,- Name: Cr mn GE PN-e'Ar5 Phone Number: l Address: q w72- Email address: �� If you are representing an organization or group,/,Tqease give the name: / CON9iiTN�10� /�l3saGY /0� Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. 0 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA I wish to speak on: Public Comm t Subject: Agenda Item No. � \A Date: / Cimle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp jor to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk orjor to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: i>6 �� Phone Number: Address. 175ktlF.T•cR�l� � If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public recortl. All information provided is optional. MM ,.,,,`� I wish to speak on: Public Comment Subject: REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: Circle One: ITY COUN L / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against - \6 Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk orior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: l %r�Sk. wcf Ft'P. �C'\V\tl��Q� _ Phone Number: � Address: Email adr If you are Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK \ 0 � CITY OF TEMECULA A 4 9tl9 Date: L;-7 I wish to speak on: Public Comment Circle One: llg Y COUNCIL CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk grlOr to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record(�� Name: �Y-t— 'iV e C Email address: �_ If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. REQUEST TO SPEAK`/` 0CITY OF TEMECULA Z L Date: I wish to speak on: Public Comment %Circle One: ITY COUN/yCI1� CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: — �i' l�/l if1l aCI) Y Y"rS Agenda Item No. For Against Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for [he rec Name: / Email address: If you are re. an ing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA For ❑ Against ❑ M. Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the recortl /f�t ( faC61Y4A Email address: � If you are representing an organization or group, please Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. /� REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA 1989 I wish to speak speak on: p�h� Public Co mme Circle One: Subject: ❑ Agenda Item No. Date. COUNCIL /CSD/SARDA/THA/TPFA For ❑ Against ❑ Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that�Once the speak called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the recortl. ,/1 (� Name: 7 c y II �'C Phone Number. Address. Email ad If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public recortl. All information provided is optional. 9 REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Date: I wish to speak on: IQL Public Comment Circle One: CITY COUNCIL / CSD / SARDA / THA / TPFA Subject: \C_J(.�\ Agenda Item No. R tt For Against `E] Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker Is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. 1 /� i Address: P 1 4S (3 Email If you are representing an organization or group, please give the name: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All Information provided is optional. From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 9:42 AM To: ' Subject: FW: Public Comments for City Council Meeting July 27 Attachments: July 27 City Council Public Comments.docx Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk rand, ohilzinemeculaca.00v 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Gary A Oddi < Sent: Monday, July 26, 20219:38 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments for City Council Meeting July 27 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Here is our email public comments regarding Item#8 Consent Calendar Agenda. Community members Dale Borgeson, Ric Van Der Linden, and George Tamayo, all members of the Bike Temecula Valley Steering Committee have prepared these comments on behalf of Bike Temecula Valley. We have also attached a word document of the comments. Thank you, Steering Committee, BTV Subject: Public Comments, Agenda Item #8 Date: July 26, 2021 From: Dale Borgeson, Ric Van Der Linden, George Tamayo (Representing Bike Temecula Valley, a bicycle coalition) BTV Public Comments Regarding Consent Calendar Item 8, Approve Second Amendment to Agreement with David Evans and Associates, Inc. for the Diaz Road Expansion Project, PW17-25 Mayor Edwards and Council Members, thank you for hearing our comments tonight. Bike Temecula Valley is a new bicycle coalition intent upon advocating for infrastructure and programs that will enhance cycling and pedestrian safety, accessibility to active transportation, improve traffic circulation, and encourage human movement. The Diaz Road Expansion provides opportunities to make improvements on transportation mobility and connectivity, that include car circulation flow and potential human powered vehicle and pedestrian flow. The current paved and dirt trail along the creek side of Diaz Road is a segment of both the "proposed Temecula Loop Trail" and "The Murreta Creek Regional Trail." Though Phase One of the expansion project does not include widening and reconfiguring of this Class One trail segment, the project does include Class II bike lanes and some pedestrian improvements. Since the plans for Phase One are moving forward with some bicycle considerations, and a class one trail is already in place, we would like to focus our comments on Phase Two tonight. The Phase Two Road Expansion should consider improvements to infrastructure that is currently in place along that road segment. There is a concrete trail, gravel trail, and dirt path on the Creek side of Diaz Road from Winchester to Cherry. We would hope that Phase Two will include improvements to the extension of The Murrieta Creek Trail from Winchester Road to the Murrieta / Temecula border at Cherry Street. Soon, we will join The City Council and City Staff to Celebrate the Santa Gertrudis Trail Undercrossing and the opening of the Old Town section of the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail. These two trail projects exemplify the City's commitment to including trails and active transportation in the City's transportation and circulation plans. We urge the Council and City Staff to include improvement to the Murrieta Creek Regional Trail in Phase Two of the Diaz Expansion. Considering building quality trails and infrastructure for bicycles, other human powered vehicles, and pedestrians will encourage more walking and bike trips, thus improving circulation flow in our city and region. We look forward to being a part of the City's dedication to quality of life. Projects like The Temecula Loop Trail and Murrieta Creek Regional Trail exemplify Temecula City Staff and City Council's commitment to advancing our community's quality of life! Dale Borgeson, Ric Van Der Linden, George Tamayo From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 9:42 AM To: 'victor mcdowell' Cc: 'ctmassa' Subject: RE: Public Statement Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Diredor / City Clerk randi.iohkrltemeculacaoov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt From: victor mcdowell < Sent: Sunday, July 25, 20217:15 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: ctmassa < Subject: Public Statement CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Ladies and Gentlemen, Im a 62 year old African American middle school football coach here in the city. In my three previous years of coaching the team, race relations wasnt much of a concern. With the team being probably 90 percent white there wasnt any previous racial issues. Last summer a Hispanic player asked an African American player what is BLM. A white player over hearing the question responded "BLM is a punch of Bullsh"", and more black people kill each other more than the police do. About a week later, another white player told the same African American player that, "Black Lives Dont Matter". First thing, All races victimize their own race more. Secondly unsolicted cruel statements are unnecessary and non productive. 12 year olds learn those hurtful comments from someone. Both incidents are reasons that people in this city need a diversity commission to create more understanding. Thank you for your time, Vic McDowell From: Randilohl Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 4:55 PM To: 'Christine O'Neil' Subject: RE: Pis read at City Council Mtg, July 27th....this is regarding REDI Commission, Thank you Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/City Clerk randi.iohl(dtemeculaca.cov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 call= Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Christine O'Neil < Sent: Monday, July 26, 20214:17 PM To: Randi lohl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Pis read at City Council Mtg, July 27th.... this is regarding REDI Commission, Thank you CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Council Members, We believe that all men and women are created equal under God. We do NOT see the necessity of the REDI Commission.. Brian and Christine ONeill From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 5:06 PM To: 'M. Bourbonnais' Subject: RE: Public Comment 07/ 27/ 21 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/City Clerk randi.iohlORemeculaca.00v 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: M. Bourbonnais < Sent: Monday, July 26, 20212:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comment 07/ 27/ 21 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. This is in response to recent comments made by Council Member Alexander regarding where Temecula is falling short on race. Let's start with data. According to the City's 2020 Pop -Facts Demographics, Temecula's population is predominately White. There isn't anything fundamentally wrong with that, but it's racially homogeneous. Historically, homogenous anything - towns, cities, schools, churches, fill in the blank, are breeding grounds for intolerance, racism, oppression, and all sorts of other social injustices that our country has stood up against for decades. Based on this knowledge alone, Temecula should aspire for better. Progress isn't made in echo chambers and diversity is critical to a thriving community. Let's also look at representation. There's no chance of political equality, or all the great things local government can provide a community, without representation. The City's council members may very well be qualified individuals, but they do not represent people of color in Temecula. Nor do they represent the local economic workforce or the 60% of Temecula's households priced out of home ownership. A lack of representation, which equates deficiencies in understanding and empathy, is at the heart of Temecula's affordable housing crisis. If council members were part of the local workforce, dependent upon the mercy of property owners, living in 500 square foot apartments with 4 other family members, or facing a 3+ year waiting list for basic shelter, I guarantee they'd negotiate better terms for constituents before giving private investors $6 million dollars to build so-called affordable housing. Temecula, for all its charming attributes, falls short on race, equity, diversity, and inclusion. If council members believe otherwise, it's likely because they only hear from affluent constituents. The 60% who are priced out of homeownership are too stressed and busy and overwhelmed to submit public comments. They are trying to find operable washing machines. They are crunching numbers to figure out how they will absorb yet another rent increase. They are disillusioned because politicians, almost always, are charismatic speakers, but lack follow through. FYI: charisma doesn't silence the reverberating windows that tenants "choose" when they are forced to accept the conditions of affordable housing, no matter how slumlord-ish they may be. The notion that Temecula doesn't need the REDI Commission is another example of where the City falls short. The Commission is currently the most diverse piece of Temecula's Executive representation. I'd encourage Council to embrace REDI members and work toward a greater Temecula with an empathetic and open mind. Sincerely, Melissa Bourbonnais From: Randi Johl Sent: Monday, July 26, 2021 5:08 PM To: 'Jeanine Robinson' Subject RE: Public comment for city council meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randl Johl, JD, MIMIC Legislative Director I City Clerk randi.iohintemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jeanine Robinson < Sent: Monday, July 26, 202112:19 PM To: Rand! Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for city council meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Unfortunately, I don't have the privilege to attend the city council meeting in person, like many of us who worked to create the REDI commission and others in our community. I am commenting to thank my representative Zak Schwank and each of you who respond to us with support, open minds, and open hearts, rather than adversarially. I have a service background, but not from a position of power or authority such as policing or as a military sergeant. Rather in medicine as a surgeon's clinic manager and assistant. In serving patients one of my jobs was to listen to what side effects may have been experienced either with medicine or post procedurally, and convey it to the doctor for treatment. Regardless of how unlikely I may have thought it sounded. So, I thank you for listening to what our community has had to say about the side effects of being in the minority whether it be skin color, ethnicity, neurodiversity, differently-abled, medically fragile, or of different socioeconomic status or religion. Thank you for understanding that while the civic unrest of last year played a role in the movement to create the REDI commission, real diversity goes far beyond race alone. And thank you for realizing that the reason for putting R for race first makes sense as an acronym whereas something like DERI just doesn't. Thank you for listening and serving instead of trying to tell anyone that what they are living through isn't happening or hasn't happened. Thank you for respecting that your own understanding of God doesn't apply to everyone, such as our Jewish, Buddhist, or Hindu community members, and for not using your God against anyone. Thank you for understanding that not every bit of representation will always be necessary for everyone, but that EVERYONE does deserve to be represented. To all of you on the REDI commission, I thank you for your service as well. Sincerely, Jeanine Robinson Temecula resident Mother of two and Type 1 diabetes mom Asthmatic Temecula Unity co-founder From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 9:01 AM To: 'Robert Lamb' Subject: RE: July 27ths city council meeting notes: stop the Emergency Orders. Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.johl@temeculaca.gov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. -----Original Message ----- From: Robert Lamb < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:43 AM To: Randi Johl <mnc1Ljohl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: July 27ths city council meeting notes: stop the Emergency Orders. CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To the City Council of Temecula You have continued to abuse authority that you should never have taken by enacting Emergency Orders. There was more than enough proof to prove that covid mainly only harmed the same comorbidity sick people that the regular flu would have harmed. The Emergency Orders should have been dropped just a few months after starting them. You Must vote to immediately stop the Emergency Orders because we have known fora long time there is no emergency! Quarentine's are for sick people only and it is proven that locking down everyone is bad for everyone. This city does not want you to even think of doing it again. Only emotionally over -drawn, anxiety ridden people who have no rational thought are the ones screaming for locking the world down. You are expected to put feelings aside and do what is right. I demand you end the E/O's now. The fact that you kept the lock down going just so you could get millions from the state when this city never needed a dime is despicable and since you voted to do that, you are despicable. You are directly responsible for harming people in Temecula to get state money that we don't need here. For this reason alone even though there are many, you need to be replaced for voting this way. What are you going to do with the money? I doubt you will be transparent and open the books and give us bank statements with out a court fight. If you keep the E/O's in place, you can give city contracts to who ever you want and yes, we think you are going to get kickbacks. If you end the Emergency Orders, the contracts have to go out for bids. I think you're going to do the same underhanded political business like Obama after the 2008 bailouts and you're going to payoff large entities that will feed it back to you, but you won't give anything to the actual people and business owners that you have harmed. Will you promise to be 100%transparent and open the books and all bank statements upon request? Will we have to replace all of you but Jessica Alexander? MaryAnn Edwards is on record saying that the money was not guaranteed even if they continued the lockdowns previously like the state wanted. She and the rest minus Jessica Alexander voted to keep the city locked down while other cities opened up and still got money from the state. This just shows further abhorrent judgment on your part and that you need to be replaced. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 9:04 AM To: ' Subject: RE: General Comments for Temecula City Council Meeting July 27, 2021 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director I City Clerk randi.iohlid)lemeculaca.00v 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City or Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Monday, July 26, 20216:05 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Jessica Alexander <Iessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Erika Ramirez <erika. ram irez@temeculaca.gov> Subject: General Comments for Temecula City Council Meeting July 27, 2021 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Temecula City Council ... I have raised past concerns to you regarding the Temecula Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission. Connecting a few dots will better illustrate some alarming aspects about the genesis of the REDI Commission that are important to know. As per the City Clerk's July 13 briefing, the REDI Commission was modeled after the National League of Cities' Race Equity and Leadership (REAL) program. Additionally, our City Clerk has been personally recognized by the League of California Cities, a subsidiary of the National League of Cities (NLC), as a co-chair promoting the REAL program. The NLC's REAL program was developed in conjunction with the left-wing agitation group Race Forward, aka the Center for Social Inclusion (CSI), and the Government Alliance on Race and Equity (GARE), a subsidairy of CSI and Race Forward. This information is publicly available on the National League of Cities' website as a New The non-profit and non -partisan watch dog organization Influence Watch describes the NLC as follows: The National Leaaue of Cities is a left -leaning network of over 19,000 American communities that engages in federal policy advocacy and leads educational programming on behalf of city governments.... Each year, NLC adopts a federal policy agenda at its national conference, covering a range of issues from recommending environmentalist policy to advocating for left -of -center gun control measures Influence Watch describes the before mentioned Government Alliance on Race and Eauity as follows: Government Alliance on Race and Eouity is a fiscally sponsored project of Race Forward that serves as a coalition of local governments engaging in vocal support for race -first and identity policies. The project is also funded by the Otherino and Belonging Institute (formerly the Haas Institute for a Fair and Inclusive Society), a left -of -center think tank housed at the University of California at Berkeley that produces studies pushing race -first policies. Race Forward, not satisfied in just formulating REAL and REDI programs, also actively promotes Critical Race Theory (CRT) by providing political attack strategies against those offering sincere critiques. Their website reads as follows: Download this guide to craft your response to attacks on racial equity training, whether you are a parent, activist, or government worker. Contact Race Forward at mediaCcDraceforward.org if you want to work with Race Forward's team to develop (and potentially pitch) your story in support of education and training on systemic racism. " Through these connections it becomes readily apparent that this REDI Commission could easily morph into the proverbial Trojan Horse. The base source of the REDI Commission, Race Forward, is a politically poisoned well. As such this current commission should be scrapped. Lastly, the city seems prepared to spend up to $7500 for media training for the REDI Commission. This commission is supposedly to only serve as council advisors, not as public affairs officers. Hence there seems no need for trained commissioners in the art of media spin and prevarication. Temecula does not need commissioners circling around and spinning the community with vague bromides further clouding public relations. If there must be training in the interim, a better alternative for the REDI Commission would be to utilize the Temecula based non -partisan and non-profit Constitution Association. The organization is right here and the commissioners could surely take a lot away from some training conducted by the Constitution Association. Thank you for your time and attention. Rick Reiss Temecula, CA 92592 Post Script: I have Bcc these comments to 100+ contacts including media representatives, local organization leaders and other interested Temecula residents. G'day! References: https: //temeculaca.legista r. com/View. ashx?M = F&ID=9602991&GUID=57C2166B-D7E 4140-81B6-466FB9F3DOEB https: //www. n ic.org/post/2017/05/O 1/new-partnersh i p-between-the-nationa I -league -of - cities -a nd-center-for-socia I-inclusion-to-advance-racia I-eo u itv/ https: //www.ca lcities.org/detai I-pages/news/2021/02/ 12/league-of-cal ifornia-c!ties- la unches-advanci na-ea u itv-advisory-comm ittee-to-support-cities-i n-efforts-to-root-out- systemic-racism httos: //www. i nfluencewatch. org/non-profit/nationa I -league -of -cities/ https: //www. i nfl uencewatch.oru/non-profit/local-and-reaio na I -govern ment-alliance-on- race-and-equity-gare/ httr)s://www.influencewatch.oro/non-profit/race-forward/ httos: //m ove menth u b. org/resou rce/o u ide-to-cou nter-na rrati nci-the-attacks-on-critica (- race -theory/ httos: //temecu laca.lea istar.com/View. ashx?M=F&ID=9602996&GUID=6C242 DOD-7EE 1- 4EEA-B2C8-C288CC392225 https://constitutionassociation.volasite.com it v^ MOVEMENT NUBA •AM CaFige b Cowf�-NarzaYng Ne Auxks an Mugl RaR lfirory _ e.r�l• race forwari _ ;lALJUSTICE � naaiel OvbmO�narralve iW aSalauneMoq po PWa� �FMoxr�MM IN a a eOiNN �n nrn�-aM amury ni arclery �� w-Il •- Id 11 Wp :�.�n'o•'� w �aa ode W ma�.moa� anon N'T5 5 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 2:00 PM To: 'Jon C' Subject: RE: City council comments Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/City Clerk randi: ohl(c)temeculacs.00v 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 FI. Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jon C < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20211:42 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City council comments CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I stand with and support the REDI commission. Representation matters. Our town has made national news multiple times over the past two years for its racial insensitivities from members of this council. Councilman Stew has put forth the effort to learn from his mistakes and attend REDI training. Sadly Jessica refuses to work on her shortcomings, but one obstructionist should not stop the city from wanting to improve. Jonathan Chang. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 2:01 PM To: 'Rachel Dennis' Subject: RE: REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Rand! Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/City Clerk randi.iohl(a8emeculaca.00v 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and there/ore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Rachel Dennis< Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 202111:56 AM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI Commission CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, My name is Rachel Dennis and I am a Pastor in the city of Temecula. I have been working in ministry in our valley for the past 15 years. I want to applause the city for establishing the REDI Commission - a long needed commission to help our beautiful valley become more inclusive and diverse. More loving and humble. Thank you REDI Commission for being servant leaders in the fight for peace. I have been shocked through the years to hear the experiences of racism and homophobia in our valley, to read of the treatment of refugees coming for help, those needing healthcare and the treatment of the homeless who are poor in health and wealth. School administrators, church leaders, city leaders and business owners alike have all been guilty of this destruction toward the oppressed and minority community in our valley. After listening to comments from city members at the last meeting I am embarrassed. After listening to comments from the church community that attended the last meeting to belittle and harass our city council I am embarrassed to call myself a Christian. The God I serve stood with the oppressed. Stood with those excluded and cast away by society and the religious. The God I serve loves, not harms. The God I serve fights for equality of all. The God I serve advanced inclusivity beyond the church and I'm sad to say would still be fighting the religious in our city. The God I serve was a refugee and 1 fear if he came to Temecula he would be met with a sign to "go back home". Thank you for your hard work in bettering this valley for ALL people. Don't let hate stop you. We NEED the REDI Commission to make our valley more beautiful. Rachel Dennis Temecula Pastor Rachel Dennis Outreach and Local Missions Pastor Rancho United This email antl any files transmitted wdh it are confiderdial antl intendetl solely for the use of the Intlividual or entity to whom drey are eddmssed. Ifyou have received this email in error please notify the system manager. This message may contain cordMenfiel information and is intended only for the 4MivWual named. If you am nor the named addresses, you shouts not disseminate, dnanbute or copy this email Please notify the sender immediately by e-mail of mu have moetm,f this a -mail by mistake and tlelete tau e-mail amen your system. Hyou are not the intended recipont you are minted that disckuing, copying, tlistrM." or talvng any action in reliance on the contents ofVes Inramatlon is shirty prohibited From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 2:01 PM To: 'Gillian Larson' Subject: RE: Public comment for tonight please Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Rand! Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director I City Clerk rand.mhl(cdtemeculaca.wv 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 F); Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt From: Gillian Larson <gillianrealityrallyL@gmail. Tuesday, July 27, 202112:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for tonight please CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Ranch, I am on the East Coast so cannot come in to give my comment. Please read it for me. Thanks, Gillian I have lived in Temecula for 20 years and have always thought we were such a unique community which I even called a Utopian Bubble. I have been watching in sadness and with horror at what is happening in our town in so many areas and how the REDI Commission has become a powderkeg with political opinions being the fuse. I can only think that people did not review the slides that were presented way back in an August 2020 Council meeting, so Temecula could see, in detail what this commission would be structured to accomplish. Commissions of this nature have been formed in many cities in this country and our Temecula City Council had started considering a commission of this kind several years ago thinking they would like a body that could be the voice of our residents. It is the R that everyone has become inflamed over when that is only one part and race actually doesn't even mean just black or white. This Commission is tasked with listening to our community to hear the needs of ALL of our citizens. Temecula has been doing a great job including our aging population, special needs groups, those with various religious choices, families with all ages of children, different cultures and races, lifestyle choices and so much more in what has been created and offered in Temecula For one example, look how Temecula led the way in identifying the needs of our Autistic and physically challenged community when it became clear their needs were different than ours in so many areas. One clear and visible proof of that work is, now all of our children can laugh and play in our playgrounds, not just mine. There is always more that can be done to enhance the lives of all of our community to ensure all of our needs are included in what Temecula has to offer and that is what the REDI Commission will be doing. Listening and presenting our ideas to the Council and City for consideration. Thank you for the virtual opportunity to speak. Gillian Larson All the best, Gillian Creator and Event Producer, President Reality Rally Inc My T.E.D talk. My S.U.E Talk www.realityrally.com Please sign up for our News Updates Reality Rally Sizzle Reel Follow us on facebook.com/realitvrally Twitter @realityrally IG @realityrally CBS Survivor Reality Star Gillian Sizzle Reel httos://www.Youtube.com/watch?v Hr6YDFMwu-c From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:29 PM To: 'Karen Gamer' Subject: RE: Public Comments Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director I City Clerk randi.iohl(Mtemeculaca aov 41000 Main St Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments. may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt From: Karen Garner < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20213:51 PM To: Ranch Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public Comments CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good evening, I have lived in the valley with my husband and 4 kids for 21 years. We moved here to raise our family in a slower paced community full of parks, good schools and family activities. In that way, the area lived up to our expectations. I didn't expect to live in a community with so much anger, hate, and division. I have been embarrassed by our city many more times than I have been proud. When churches united to stop a mosque, I was mortified. When church going people blocked busses full of children from our southern border, I cried for them. I was so ashamed. When I was angrily harassed by a local contractor, while in my minivan full of little ones because I had an Obama sticker, I was scared for my safety. I had never seen such anger or heard such vile words in my life. Last week, while watching the city council meeting, I was again embarrassed by the ignorance, disrespect and hate that I heard. I write this note to let you know that when the REDI commission was created, I was proud of our city. My pessimism was proven wrong, you actually did it. You acknowledged that you don't know what you don't know, and you realized that you have an obligation to try to find out. We can't know what people need unless they have a voice. Thank you for creating the commission, listening to their recommendations, and please continue to support the REDI commission. Thank you, Karen Garner From: Randilohl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:29 PM To: 'Craig Dunham' Subject: RE: City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randt Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director City Clerk randi.iohl(cDtemeculaca.my 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Craig Dunham< Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20214:18 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: City Council Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, I want to express my support for the REDI commission. I have lived in Temecula for 12 years with my family. I want to raise my children in a community that values and teaches equality, inclusion and tolerance. I believe the REDI commission will help our community in many ways. Thank you! Sincerely, Craig Dunham From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:29 PM To: 'Lisa Skinner' Subject: RE: Concerns of a Temecula City Supporter Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. ohl@lemeculaca.my 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt From: Lisa Skinner < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20213:48 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: Lisa Skinner< Subject: Concerns of a Temecula City Supporter CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Randi, I MAY be there in person this evening to read this myself ... not sure yet. Mayor Edwards and Council members, I am urging you to remove the local health emergency orders. The cities of Yorba Linda, Laguna, Huntington and Newport have done so. We never want to see Temecula locked down again. We saw how our neighbors, families, friends and small business owners suffered. Many of those neighbors, families, friends and small business are people with brown or black skin and I know that causing those individuals anymore harm with mandates or restrictions goes against all that the REDI commission stands for. I know that council members chose to keep the city locked down and muzzled for the promise of a payday. . In fact, 2 meetings ago, Aaron Adams announced that the $14 million was really an insignificant amount of money compared to the city's overall budget. Hopefully Mr. Adams doesn't deem the hardships the business owners and citizens of Temecula endured during the chosen lock downs as insignificant in the grand scheme of things. It will be interesting to see how the $14million actually gets spent over the next five years and exactly WHO it will benefit. I am sure the 350 businesses that have closed will also be very curious. As news of the "new pandemic being caused by the unvaccinated" takes over the mainstream media's talk track, council needs to be reminded that ALL business owner's and citizens' rights need to be protected and upheld and THIS TIME we expect council to vote NO in following and restrictive mandates that may come down from Washington, Sacramento or the county. you know more mandates are coming. Chose the right's of the citizens over money the next time around. Thank you! Lisa Skinner From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:30 PM To: 'Emily Heyler' Subject: RE: REDI Commission support Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MIMIC Legislative Director/City Clerk randi.iohl(&temeculaca.00v 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Emily Heyler < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 3:39 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI Commission support CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To Whom It May Concern, I am writing this letter today in support of the REDI Commission. As our nation has seen over the past few years, we have a lot of work to do in terms of racial equality, promoting and celebrating diversity, and inclusion. It is important that this work come from the bottom up, the change happening within our communities with input from those directly affected. We cannot stand idly by while any of our neighbors face adversity for who they are. I think the commission can be a source of great support for our community in ensuring a welcoming and diverse city for years to come. Thank you, Emily Heyler, Temecula resident Emily Heyler, M.A., Sp.Ed. From: Randijohl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:45 PM To: ' Subject: RE: My Public Comments for the July 27 Temecula City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randl Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director City Clerk randi.iohlfdlemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20213:36 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: My Public Comments for the July 27 Temecula City Council Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To The Temecula City Council, I want to share an open letter from Justice Now that supports the REDI Commission's demand for Equity. Please realize that equality is not enough... Equity is the key. "To Our White Allies: Talk is not enough. Commit yourself towards taking action and making sacrifices to correct centuries of injustice. Open up spaces for Black and LatinX communities by refusing to send your kids to Ivy League and US News & World Report Top 50 Schools... And encourage friends, neighbors, and family members to do the same. Imagine if those hundreds of thousands of spots at these institutions were occupied only by marginalized communities. Imagine the opportunities. We can achieve true Equity within our lifetimes but only if white folks are willing to sacrifice their privileges." End quote. And also in regard to adding an Equity Core Value to the OLMP, I add this from Professor Sam Williams of Penn State University, "To be less white is to be less Oppressive, less Arrogant, less Certain, less Defensive, less Ignorant. Be more humble, listen, believe, break with party, and break with white solidarity." "Who have you guys oppressed today? You're breathing. Have you left your house today? Okay, so you may have oppressed somebody." End quote. So, to all of you irredeemably racist whites, I repeat the most crucial statement of the open letter, "We can achieve true Equity within our lifetimes but only if white folks are willing to sacrifice their privileges." End quote. It's the least you can do, but it will never be enough... And thank you, Randi, for using your platform as Temecula's City Clerk to help make sure that Equity and Social Justice get permanently installed in our city. Thanks in no small part to your efforts, there is an equitable lens being put on Temecula's City Council and all Commissions. And also thanks to you, Randi, the REDI Commission has the direction, input and influence from your vast experience and numerous connections to get the equitable job done, even here in Temecula. If the white majority here is divested of its white traditions and racist small town ideals then Equity for people of color will finally be advanced and Temecula can be a global city for the future! Lastly, I want to acknowledge the Temecula City Council for approving Agenda Item number 3, The List of Demands that includes your check number 206121 dated July 1, 2021 to Birth Choice of Temecula Inc. They can assist people of color with their quote, "decision counseling," including referrals and abortion options. According to their website quote, "A surgical procedure can terminate a pregnancy in the first, second or third trimester up to 9 months in some cases, while the chemical procedure is an option within the first few weeks of pregnancy." End quote. I'm sure people of color will be happy that you are helping. From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:45 PM To: 'Harmony Pyper' Subject: RE: REDI Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MIMIC Legislative Director City Clerk randiJoInKtitemeculaca m 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Harmony Pyper< Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20214:45 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello - I am writing in support of the Race Equity Commission being established in Temecula. As a local High School basketball coach and the mom of 4 children, 2 of whom are biological, White sons and 2 are adopted, Black daughters, I absolutely seethe benefit of this committee for our community. This is away to ensure that all those in our wonderful community are given equal opportunities. We will all benefit from the diversity that this will ensure in our community and I am excited to see how it will bring us all closer together. My transracial family and the diverse athletes that I work with in our community thank you. Sincerely, Harmony Pyper From: Randi lohl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4A5 PM To: 'Andrea Dunham' Subject: RE: Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JO, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl(atemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Andrea Dunham < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 3:09 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good evening, I am writing in support and appreciation of the REDI committee. I have lived in Temecula with my family for 12 years and I love this city and it's residents. We have a diverse group of friends and value teaching our children about equity and inclusion. Sadly over the years, we have seen a number of friends have to deal with discrimination. In two instances, our friend's children were called the "n" word by classmates. Another friend's child was told that it was wrong to have two mommies. I want all residents of Temecula to feel safe and included in our community. I truly believe the REDI commission will help improve our town. Thank you. Sincerely, Andrea Dunham From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4A5 PM To: 'Rosen-Rager' Subject: RE: Public comments for City Council meeting tonight v 727/2021 Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director I City Clerk randi.iohlatemeculaca.00v 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disdosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Rosen-Rager < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 3:28 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comments for City Council meeting tonight v 7/27/2021 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Randi, Thank you for all your work for the city and for running the council meetings so elegantlyl Kindly read the following during the public comments section. Pronunciation: My first name, Shaul, rhymes with Raul. Comment submitted by: Shaul Rosen-Rager Mayor Edwards and council members, I am writing in support of the amazing work you are doing for this city, and to thank you for your clear thinking about the need for this city to be a welcoming place for everyone. Two weeks ago you were subjected to a coordinated attack on your decision to create and support the REDI commission. Many of the speakers expressed their love for this city, and concern for its future. What happened two weeks ago? Our nation is going through a dark period, and it is in the political interest of certain powers to stock fear and anger, because when people are afraid, they become engaged and motivated. Critical Race Theory was identified as an issue that can be used to ignite fear, anger and even hate amongst certain conservative voters. This anger needs a target, an outlet, and you, as well as the TVUSD, were identified as a local focal point forthis anger. This is not about you. Do not take it personally. Please know that you have a lot of support: Many of us are not succumbing to the fear -mongering. We are ready to hear what the REDI commission will find out. We are ready to make changes, if it means that this city will be a welcome place for everyone. There is strength in diversity, and we want to be strong and united. The march towards a great future can only progress if we notice where we made mistakes in the past, and if we can correct these mistakes. Please stand tall and proud of your achievements. Continue to lead this community towards a future where everyone feels welcome everywhere. P.S. There is no Marxist conspiracy to destroy America. Thank you Shaul Rosen -Roger Co -lead, Southwest Riverside County Chapter Citizens Climate Lobby ( Hope is not the conviction that something will turn out well but the certainty that something makes sense, regardless of how it turns out. (Vaclav Havel) From: Randi lohl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:49 PM To: 'Nancy Carlton' Subject: RE: REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/ City Clerk randi.iohlraltemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 FT, Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula. along with attachments, may be subject to the Califomia Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Nancy Carlton < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20214:47 PM To: Rand! Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI Commission CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. As a resident of Temecula for almost 30 years, I am writing to ask you to reconsider funding and implementing the REDI Commission as it is now proposed. It seems to me that this Commission would have undue influence over the City Council that other groups do not have. Our tax dollars should not be funding this Commission and should not have direct access to the City Council that other citizens and commissions do not have. When you start giving favor to one group, one people or one commission, it will only serve to divide. In the almost 30 years in Temecula. I have never fell that Temecula is a racist community. CRT seems to be at the heart for the purpose of this Commission. I think we can agree, racism in all forms is abhorrent. Our nation has come a long way since Jim Crow and 'Equal but Separate" with the passage of that 964 Civil Rights Act, ". This very act said we should not discriminate based on the color of one's skin. Now we are being told that, based on the color of our skin, we are oppressed or an oppressor! Things like the REDI Commission will build walls of division rather than build bonds of unity. Our nation's constitution is a brilliant document and because of it, we are an exceptional nation that people around the world still want to come to. Just like all people and all nations, we are not perfect. We have had issues to overcome and even fought a civil war over the slavery issue. Equal Opportunity is what we should always strive for. "Equity" is a Marxist code word equal outcomes and has not place in a city commission. The REDI Commission is not the answer for Temecula. Regards, Nancy Carlton Temecula, 92592 From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:57 PM To: 'Gitagreen'. Subject: RE: Reddit commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohlAtemaculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Gitagreen < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20215:52 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Reddit commission CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please stop trying to decide the Human Race!! Inn totally against it ! Brigitte Green From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:57 PM To: 'Cindy Kennedy' Subject: RE: Public comment for tonights council ring Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read Into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/ City Clerk mndijohl(ollemecolaca my 41000 Main SL Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and there/ore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Cindy Kennedy < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20215:48 PM To: Rand! Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Public comment for tonights council mtg CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear City Council, I would like to ask you to please decommission this divisive REDI commission before any further damage is done. You couldn't have selected a more partisan group of members. Most of the REDI commissioners have ties to this local social justice warrior group led by Julie Geary. Several of which speak at their monthly meetings. I find it absolutly mind boggling that you all let yourselves be pressured into creating this very controversial commission. No wonder Mike Naggar decided he had enough. He knew where this was all going. My husband and I have lived in this city since 1989. The direction this city council is going is very concerning. We did not have a racism issue in our city ... but it looks like they are now trying creating one. I've also heard that several of the REDI commissioners speak at their weekly meetings. This group likes to look for issues that create division within our community. One of there primary goals is to see Jessica Alexander recalled from the city council. Jessica is the one council member that actually represents and listens to her constituents and is not letting this group control her. Just last week one of their members wrote a letter to Temecula Police Captain Hall claiming a council member was threatened with violence at the last regular city council meeting. That is an outright lie. I was at this meeting and not one threat was made. Here is an excerpt from that email: Email to Captain Hall:. I'm a Temecula resident, along with being a retired police detective. I retired after 34 years of service. I'd be the first to admit you have a tough job. That being said, I'd like your take on an issue. I recently became aware of the behavior of some individuals at a recent city council meeting. I understand that one of our council members was threatened with violence. If verbal threats were made In a public venue, paid for by the people of Temecula, while individuals were taking part in conducting their civic duties. Some direct action should have been taken. Council members should be able to conduct their business freely, and safely. All people council members,and the general public exercising their rights should feel safe. Any person, and I mean any person promoting those groups to gather at our city hall to preform such acts should be held criminally responsible. All persons making threats should be arrested on site. These actions shouldnt be ignored. It will only allow it to build up momentum. Are you going to wait until a tragic incident occurs before you take action? Captain I hope you strongly consider taking action against these offenses. After some of the incidents in this country over the past year, it's becoming more, and more uncomfortable for people of color to conduct their day to day affairs without the fear of hate mobs protesting a diversity commission. That is the end of the letter to Captain Hall. This women was not even at the meeting, and she now claims Captain Hall has agreed to meet with her in person? Why would he agree tothat? He already told her that didn't happen. I guess since they now have control of the city council, the REDI commission and the school board.... they now are looking to expand their influence and control our Sheriffs dept. I wonder if Captain Hall realizes this group is also trying to recall Sheriff Bianco and persuade the city to create their own police dept? From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:57 PIA To: 'Brigitte Green' Subject: RE: Important Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi. iohlOtemeculaca.my 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Fl, Please note that email correspondence with the City or Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Brigitte Green < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20215:56 PM To: Randi lohl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: Important CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Stop the Redi Commission. Temecula does not need it!! Amy Green From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 6:19 PM To: 'Julia' Subject: RE: REDI Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randl Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/ City Clerk randi.iohl(dtemeculaca.aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City or Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Julia < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20216:01 PM To: Rand! Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I am writing on behalf of myself, My children and grandchildren. I do not believe that CRT should be instituted into our school curriculum. If this is put in place we are teaching our children to be racist. There is nothing positive about any of this indoctrination. It is removing all that MILK and the civil rights movement has accomplished. It is disgusting and I do not want my tax dollars used to violate and indoctrinate our youth. It is a disgrace 1111 Warm regards, Julia Bell Sent from my phone From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 6:20 PM To: 'America First' Subject: RE: to be read tonight at your REDI meeting. Thank you Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Rand! Johl, JD, MIMIC Legislative Director I City Clerk randi.iohlthitemeculacaAoy 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: America First < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20216:16 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: to be read tonight at your REDI meeting. Thank you CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Allow me to begin by stating a fact. There are no "hate groups' in Temecula. Are there people who disagree with one -another, well ya, but that is common place in today's overly sensitive and entitled society. If you think about it, not until the lying mainstream media and other forms of entertainment, along with our politicians began telling us we should all feel the victim and blame our fellow man for so many false injustices, was there such a divide among our people. Not even under President Obama, the original Marxist who attempted to stoke division of this magnitude, was anyone not Black vilified to this extent as an enemy of his fellow man. I'm a white, Christian man with a loving family and friends with a successful business. Yet, because of each one of those things I'm being told I should feel bad about myself and guilty for being loved and appreciated and for accomplishing my dreams. That's not how the American dream is supposed to be, and I don't feel guilty for any of it. I didn't get this far because I am a white man. I am at a disadvantage actually. If I were to go out and try and get a job in today's climate, I'm not a minority, I'm not going to be the top pick anymore, unless someone still believes in the old ways of hiring based on work ethic and skillset and out of the applicants, I happen to fit the bill better than the next man. In fact, if I attempt to win a government contract, I am never going to be picked over the woman -owned or minority -owned business, heck, I won't even get the same grants or special funding as these other groups of people would. My skin color is an automatic disadvantage or even disqualifier. My success should not be looked upon as "white priviledge", that's ridiculous. I am nearly 20 years into my company that I started with no financial help and I got to where I am today with nothing but hard work and by treating everyone with respect, regardless of race, religion or upbringing. After nearly 20 years I still work 14-16 hour days most days, and have yet to ever take off more than 4 days, and never more than 2-3 times per year and always on long weekends. You want to talk about equity? How about being fair and impartial to ME? You send a gay man, a woman, and a Black man for example, along with a younger me into a corporate setting straight out of college these days and you see who gets the job, I guarantee it isn't me, the guy who unbeknownst to the interviewer has the work ethic and drive to start my first company when I was 16 years old and will work 16 - 20 hour days like clockwork to get to where I want to be in life. Nope, don't hire me, the "white devil", all my kind does is take take take according to these people on this panel here. And hiring based on race (affirmative action) is an absolute joke! Why would anyone want to be hired for a job simply because they are of a particular background? Don't they know that there was most likely better candidates and that they are hired just to meet a quota? Why should someone be forced to hire someone in one's own business, when there are far better candidates? On the flip side, why would you want to be that employee that everyone knows was hired for that reason? Work hard, better yourself and become the better you, the one that people want to hire for their skills as opposed to the person whom is needed to simply fill a void. Now how does a group like this REDI group benefit people like me? It doesn't, they want me to be ashamed of who I am. I wasn't born with a golden spoon, hell, I ate mustard sandwiches as a kid, nor was I given anything for free, I believe in the American dream and busted my butt to get where I am today, and I haven't stopped busting my butt yet! News flash, I don't feel guilty, nor do I feel any remorse for someone who doesn't want to put in the same effort as I have to get where I am. It isn't possible for everyone to start at the same place in life, it's just not realistic. However, here in America we are given the tools we need to become whoever it is we want to be, and with faith and perseverance a person in American can become whoever it is they want to be. Need an example, you can make millions of dollars playing football, 17 games per year and you can make millions of dollars. Try and do that in one of these communist countries you are trying to turn our beautiful America into. You say America is so bad, name a place where you are safer than here, name a place where you have as many freedoms and opportunities as here, you can't... it doesn't exist. No other country has an influx of American's trying to sneak into it, that crap only happens here, people only want to get into America. They understand that this is the greatest hope on the planet and I would gladly let them trade places with all of you who constantly bash our nation for false reasons. Also, you speak of the fact that it is more expensive in Temecula and it prices out families who don't earn as much, well I'm sorry, that will never change. There will always be areas that cost more to live in than others, it is supply and demand. Where there is demand and limited supply, the prices are always going to be higher. It's no different than buying a Mercedes SL500 over a Toyota Camry, but, you can always change that in America. You 2 can work hard, and build up your wealth in America and accomplish those dreams of owning a house in the city you want to live in, you may need to be thrifty, and save up, but it is always on the table in America. And to point fingers at a city as being bad because it is predominantly white is absolutely ridiculous. The only ones calling out color and stoking this division are you! You ought to be ashamed of yourselves for telling your constituents that they should feel the victim or the oppressor, when in reality, it is nothing more than a power play to you. You do not let anyone debate you while simultaneously vilifying and demonizing the white man and anyone with capitalist and Christian values, or simply a love for the traditional America our Constitution laid out in writing for ALL Americans regardless of ones race or gender. You attack faith, family and freedoms so that when a person breaks and they no longer have these foundations, who do they turn to, you hope the state. Typical of a marxist / communist regime. Christians are attacked in China as well, it works there, why not try it here in America? That's your marxist teachings at play. It's really this simple, think about the hate and division you are stoking, and then think about your children and your grandchildren, do you REALLY want to be the reason they always feel the victim or always feel ashamed as they grow up for things that they had no control of nor did they have any choice in. Well, you are destroying their futures without even knowing it, or maybe you do know it, and in that case, GOD have mercy upon your soul, and yes, there IS a GOD. Are you wanting to be like Portland? Not a chance. Portland is the absolute worst city in America because of concepts and ideals such as these you are attempting to force on us. All you are trying to push on our great city is your Marxist ideals. Temecula has always been one of the greatest and safest cities in America. I know from experience, I've lived here since 1984, when I was 5 years old. Oh ya, and those friends I mentioned earlier, they are from Japan, Australia, and South Africa to name a few, professional athletes who have traveled the planet many times over and stayed in all of the nicest cities, and do you know where it is they unanimously claim to be the greatest city on Earth, TEMECULA. Our amazing city. They appreciate it and realize just how great it is here, so why can't you? The only ones crying racism right now, are the ones who are racist themselves or feel guilty inside for something they did. White people aren't the problem, racists and marxists are the problem. Some people just like to pretend to be miserable so that people will give them attention even if it destroys the lives of their friends, family, and futures of their own children. America needs to turn back to the values for which it was founded upon, Christianity, freedom and the nuclear family. Give those a chance and you will find your peace and happiness along with all the successes and fortunes you desire. You might even realize that we are all brothers and sisters and cut from the same cloth, not enemies of each other. "We The People" are in this together, and should all be there for each other. We aren't our fellow man's enemy, we are one giant family so let's make the best of our time in this life, we only get one chance! I guarantee if you focused on just being happy and living out your dream instead of constantly looking for false fights and stuff to complain about, your lives would immediately improve. If you want your life to suck, it will suck, so why don't you just flip your thought process and enjoy your time on this beautiful rock, and in this most amazing city. Brian Proud to be raised and from Temecula From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 6:37 PM To: 'Scott Becker' Subject: RE: Opposition to REDI Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Randi Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director I City Clerk mndi'ohl(dtemeculaca aov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Scott Becker < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 6:20 PM To: Randi Johl <randiJohl @temeculaca.gov> Subject: Opposition to REDI CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. The REDI Commission and it's supporters will talk about CRT and Social inclusion, Race and Equity. This commission will be no more than a mouth piece for the left and their divisive agenda to create the actual systemic racism they say they are attempting to eliminate, that they say exists in this country. But in fact they are merely the inventors of it. This is indoctrination at its finest and is being promoted not in secret any longer but blatantly right in front of us front and center. There was no systemic racism until now. There is though systemic Marxism, communism and systemic political and educational degeneration of our society that has been occurring for years. We have become complacent and this it where complacency leads you to. A place where ethics, morals values and common sense have become irrelevant. Our children cannot be subjected to a theory, let me remind you a theory that has only one purpose and that is to divide our children in the same way we as adults have been divided by this ideaology. "Although promoted as "anti -racist" civil rights education, CRT actively encourages discrimination. At its core, CRT segregates people into two main categories: oppressors or victims. The calculation is based solely on skin color. The tenets of CRT stretch far beyond the humanities. We must as a nation, as humans who wish to live peacefully with our neighbors of all races stop this insidious movement now Scott Becker Sent from my Whone From: Randi Johl Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:57 PM To: 'Christine Grenat' Subject: RE: REDI Commission Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Rand! Johl, JD, MIMIC Legislative Director / City Clerk randi.iohl(Ebtemeculaca oov 41000 Main St, Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecula, along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Christine Grenat < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 5:55 PM To: Rand! lohl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Subject: REDI Commission CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi, I wanted to write a quick note in support of this commission. It is absolutely necessary. It is mind -boggling that there are people who do not support it's existence. I moved here in 2018 from the Deep South and thought this area would be more open to diversity. I have been very disappointed to see just how intolerant local citizens are when it comes to acknowledging there's a problem that needs to be addressed. We need this commission. Sincerely, Christine Grenat From: Rani Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 4:29 PM To: 'Jessica Christopher' Subject: RE: For Tonight's City Council Meeting Thank you for your email. It was received and will be read into the record at the next meeting. If you do not wish for your email to be read into the record, please advise. Rand[ Johl, JD, MMC Legislative Director/ City Clerk randi. iohKaMemeculaca.00v 41000 Main St. Temecula, CA 92590 Please note that email correspondence with the City of Temecular along with attachments, may be subject to the California Public Records Act, and therefore may be subject to disclosure unless otherwise exempt. From: Jessica Christopher < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 20214:02 PM To: Randi Johl <randi.johl@temeculaca.gov> Cc: James Stewart <James.Stewart@TemeculaCA.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov>; Maryann Edwards<Maryann.Edwards@TemeculaCA.gov>; Matt Rahn <matt.rahn@TemeculaCA.gov>; Zak Schwank <Zak.Schwank@temeculaca.gov>; Jessica Alexander <Jessica.Alexander@TemeculaCA.gov>; Aaron Adams <aaron.adams@temeculam.gov>; Council Assistant <council.assistant@temeculaca.gov> Subject: For Tonight's City Council Meeting CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Council members and staff, I had not watched the city council meetings in years prior to the first of this year. I must say some of the comments in the past meetings have been seriously horrendous. I find it unfortunate that Temecula has changed so much. I have a few issues I feel are critical to comment on; 1. 1 understand the video of the last meeting was heavity edited, and it no longer has footage of the mayor telling the people that we could not clap and to be quiet. Within the meeting, one of the reports stated, "the council has room for improvement in LISTING to the people" Let me suggest how that might be accomplished. a. Post the entire video, not an edited one from the last meeting. b. Don't run out of the room or try to extend the meeting so people will leave. c. Don't think that you can keep people from clapping; it's our right to be heard. I know some things might be tough to listen to, but you signed up so listen. I was considered an essential worker last year; I was given a letter and told: "go"! Like most, I have been so busy that I didn't see you were creating a REID Community. I have watched the meetings, and it's a HATE community; these people are loaded with hate. You cannot fight racism with hate; you cannot fight any hate with hate. You have created this mess; I would like you to dismantle it or reduce it to the same level as the other Committees that don't have a seat on the dais. a. I would recommend the council members and the REID Community read Unconditional by Brian Zahnd. It explains how you fight racism and everything else. My third concern is the council's lack of understanding of their job/duty to the city. We should not know your political preference. It's why you don't have to disclose it. Yourjob is to oversee the city meetings, hear the people and put aside your political preference. To protect our constitutional rights and to understand what those are. a. They are not to tell us who to like or dislike; you have made things worse, not better. b. I encourage you to read The Constitution of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, and The Bill of Rights, and get the book How to Read the Constitution by Paul B Skousen. I believe this will help you understand that your REID Community, though well-intentioned, is not a good idea or helpful. Jessica Christopher From: JOHN DRISCOLL, CPA < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 6:41 PM To: BRIAN WEAR; Randi Johl Subject: Re: Tonight's City Council Needs Your Voice CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Randi: The words below describe the way most of Temecula's hard working proud Americans feel about attempts to convert our great country. Well said Brian! Thanks! John Driscoll, CPA Office 951-296-9393 / Fax 951-296-6637 / Cell Mailing Address: Temecula, CA 92593 On Tuesday, July 27, 2021, 06:16:29 PM PDT, BRIAN WEAR < wrote: I sent this just now. Allow me to begin by stating a fact. There are no "hate groups" in Temecula. Are there people who disagree with one -another, well ya, but that is common place in today's overly sensitive and entitled society. If you think about it, not until the lying mainstream media and other forms of entertainment, along with our politicians began telling us we should all feel the victim and blame our fellow man for so many false injustices, was there such a divide among our people. Not even under President Obama, the original Marxist who attempted to stoke division of this magnitude, was anyone not Black vilified to this extent as an enemy of his fellow man. I'm a white, Christian man with a loving family and friends with a successful business. Yet, because of each one of those things I'm being told I should feel bad about myself and guilty for being loved and appreciated and for accomplishing my dreams. That's not how the American dream is supposed to be, and I don't feel guilty for any of it. I didn't get this far because I am a white man. I am at a disadvantage actually. If I were to go out and try and get a job in today's climate, I'm not a minority, I'm not going to be the top pick anymore, unless someone still believes in the old ways of hiring based on work ethic and skillset and out of the applicants, I happen to fit the bill better than the next man. In fact, if I attempt to win a government contract, I am never going to be picked over the woman -owned or minority -owned business, heck, I won't even get the same grants or special funding as these other groups of people would. My skin color is an automatic disadvantage or even disqualifier. My success should not be looked upon as "white priviledge", that's ridiculous. I am nearly 20 years into my company that I started with no financial help and I got to where I am today with nothing but hard work and by treating everyone with respect, regardless of race, religion or upbringing. After nearly 20 years I still work 14-16 hour days most days, and have yet to ever take off more than 4 days, and never more than 2-3 times per year and always on long weekends. You want to talk about equity? How about being fair and impartial to ME? You send a gay man, a woman, and a Black man for example, along with a younger me into a corporate setting straight out of college these days and you see who gets the job, I guarantee it isn't me, the guy who unbeknownst to the interviewer has the work ethic and drive to start my first company when I was 16 years old and will work 16 - 20 hour days like clockwork to get to where I want to be in life. Nope, don't hire me, the "white devil", all my kind does is take take take according to these people on this panel here. And hiring based on race (affirmative action) is an absolute joke! Why would anyone want to be hired for a job simply because they are of a particular background? Don't they know that there was most likely better candidates and that they are hired just to meet a quota? Why should someone be forced to hire someone in one's own business, when there are far better candidates? On the flip side, why would you want to be that employee that everyone knows was hired for that reason? Work hard, better yourself and become the better you, the one that people want to hire for their skills as opposed to the person whom is needed to simply fill a void. Now how does a group like this REDI group benefit people like me? It doesn't, they want me to be ashamed of who I am. I wasn't born with a golden spoon, hell, I ate mustard sandwiches as a kid, nor was I given anything for free, I believe in the American dream and busted my butt to get where I am today, and I haven't stopped busting my butt yet! News flash, I don't feel guilty, nor do I feel any remorse for someone who doesn't want to put in the same effort as I have to get where I am. It isn't possible for everyone to start at the same place in life, it's just not realistic. However, here in America we are given the tools we need to become whoever it is we want to be, and with faith and perseverance a person in American can become whoever it is they want to be. Need an example, you can make millions of dollars playing football, 17 games per year and you can make millions of dollars. Try and do that in one of these communist countries you are trying to turn our beautiful America into. You say America is so bad, name a place where you are safer than here, name a place where you have as many freedoms and opportunities as here, you can't... it doesn't exist. No other country has an influx of American's trying to sneak into it, that crap only happens here, people only want to get into America. They understand that this is the greatest hope on the planet and I would gladly let them trade places with all of you who constantly bash our nation for false reasons. Also, you speak of the fact that it is more expensive in Temecula and it prices out families who don't earn as much, well I'm sorry, that will never change. There will always be areas that cost more to live in than others, it is supply and demand. Where there is demand and limited supply, the prices are always going to be higher. It's no different than buying a Mercedes SL500 over a Toyota Camry, but, you can always change that in America. You can work hard, and build up your wealth in America and accomplish those dreams of owning a house in the city you want to live in, you may need to be thrifty, and save up, but it is always on the table in America. And to point fingers at a city as being bad because it is predominantly white is absolutely ridiculous. The only ones calling out color and stoking this division are you! You ought to be ashamed of yourselves for telling your constituents that they should feel the victim or the oppressor, when in reality, it is nothing more than a power play to you. You do not let anyone debate you while simultaneously vilifying and demonizing the white man and anyone with capitalist and Christian values, or simply a love for the traditional America our Constitution laid out in writing for ALL Americans regardless of ones race or gender. You attack faith, family and freedoms so that when a person breaks and they no longer have these foundations, who do they turn to, you hope the state. Typical of a marxist / communist regime. Christians are attacked in China as well, it works there, why not try it here in America? That's your marxist teachings at play. It's really this simple, think about the hate and division you are stoking, and then think about your children and your grandchildren, do you REALLY want to be the reason they always feel the victim or always feel ashamed as they grow up for things that they had no control of nor did they have any choice in. Well, you are destroying their futures without even knowing it, or maybe you do know it, and in that case, GOD have mercy upon your soul, and yes, there IS a GOD. Are you wanting to be like Portland? Not a chance. Portland is the absolute worst city in America because of concepts and ideals such as these you are attempting to force on us. All you are trying to push on our great city is your Marxist ideals. Temecula has always been one of the greatest and safest cities in America. I know from experience, I've lived here since 1994, when I was 5 years old. Oh ya, and those friends I mentioned earlier, they are from Japan, Australia, and South Africa to name a few, professional athletes who have traveled the planet many times over and stayed in all of the nicest cities, and do you know where it is they unanimously claim to be the greatest city on Earth, TEMECULA. Our amazing city. They appreciate it and realize just how great it is here, so why can't you? The only ones crying racism right now, are the ones who are racist themselves or feel guilty inside for something they did. White people aren't the problem, racists and marxists are the problem. Some people just like to pretend to be miserable so that people will give them attention even if it destroys the lives of their friends, family, and futures of their own children. America needs to turn back to the values for which it was founded upon, Christianity, freedom and the nuclear family. Give those a chance and you will find your peace and happiness along with all the successes and fortunes you desire. You might even realize that we are all brothers and sisters and cut from the same cloth, not enemies of each other. "We The People" are in this together, and should all be there for each other. We aren't our fellow man's enemy, we are one giant family so let's make the best of our time in this life, we only get one chance! I guarantee if you focused on just being happy and living out your dream instead of constantly looking for false fights and stuff to complain about, your lives would immediately improve. If you want your life to suck, it will suck, so why don't you just flip your thought process and enjoy your time on this beautiful rock, and in this most amazing city. Brian Proud to be raised and from Temecula From: S J < Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 8:01 PM To: Randi Johl Subject: Fwd: Public Comment 7/27/2021 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please see below message - there was an error in original address. I hope that this can still be considered since the original was attempted to be sent on time. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: S J < Date: Tue, Jul 27, 2021 at 5:32 PM Subject: Public Comment 7/27/2021 To: <randi.iohl@temecula.eov> Dear City Council Members, Thank you for your time tonight to hear the comments of your local constituents. Tonight I wanted to respond to the last City Council meeting to shed more light on the local concern for the REDI Committee. Please don't dismiss these words because you think we don't understand what this committee is about, but please hear our concerns based on the information you yourselves have provided: 1. This committee was made in haste and out of an emotional response. It stated in the presentation that this was created in response to the death of George Floyd before a trial had been concluded, in a town and state that is not our own, and one that was never proven to be because of racism. Many of us are confused about the response from you in creating a committee in a time with so much fear, sickness, and economic uncertainty. It seems some loud voices were heard during the protesting, while most of us were distracted, and this committee was made to save yourselves from the woke mob. 2. Many of us are questioning the need for this committee. What data do we have to show diversity and inclusion issues in temecula? What laws on the books that prevent voices from being heard? Is there rampant racism and discrimination? From what I can tell, there is not. We already have equality under the law in the 14th Ammendment and discrimination laws. 3. According to the presentation given last council meeting, words like "systemic racism" and "inherent bias" were described as some of the problems this committee is meant to address. You have to see how a majority of people do not see these as realities and why focusing on these things make us nervous. Even though it has been denied that Critical Race Theory is behind this group, when we see these terms used we make the connection to the discrimination that this theory elevates. 4. The terms in REDI (Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion) are also of concern, even though you seem to think they are harmless. These terms are vague and seem to value certain physical and external traits over internal differences and diversity of thought. Every single person has things that make them unique and a minority in some way, but generalizing people into these superficial groups discriminates against the individual. Race shouldn't be the most important factor in a person's life, and focusing on it creates division. Diversity of skin color or gender should not be more important than diversity of thought. People of all backgrounds are already included under the law. And equity supports equal outcome rather than equal opportunity, which many find to be a dangerous term that puts empathy over thoughtful policy. 5. Every member of the committee has their own biases and cannot separate them when speaking up for groups they find need a voice. All people should have and do have an equal voice in our local government. We all have the opportunity, and it's ok to be thoughtful and listen to the people of Temecula, but a committee that elevates certain voices will always create disparities. It seems this group was created to try not to offend, but responding out of this can impact the effectiveness of policy making in a negative way. Policy should be based on data to fix solutions, not feelings and avoiding offense. Ultimately this committee comes across as dangerous to our town, too progressive and aimed to attempt to fix problems that aren'tthere, protect all of you from the left and lawsuits, and focus on some over others in our community. We urge you to reconsider the harmful effects that can come from this committee and dismantle it based on the responses from us, your constituents. Thank you. Sincerely, A working mom who couldn't attend.