HomeMy WebLinkAbout121404 CC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will
enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104
ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
A REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
DECEMBER 14, 2004-7:00 P.M.
At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items
can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which
additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M.
wnezner zo;mivaze-uugazion.
Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and vario
parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the Ci
Clerk.
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. 2004-16
Resolution: No. 2004-126
CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Mike Naggar
Prelude Music: Eve Craig
Invocation: Pastor Mike Preston of Southwest Christian Church
Flag Salute: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero
ROLL CALL: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, Nagger
PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS
A History in Stone
R:\Agenda\121404
1
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on
items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on
an item which is listed on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a
pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to
Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item.
There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made
at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the
agenda.
Resolution approving List of Demands
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO.04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS
AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Statements, Auditor's Report,
and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for Fiscal Year ended June 30,
2004.
R:\Agenda\121404
4
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Approve an agreement with Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services, Inc. in an
amount not to exceed $48,577 for professional bridge inspection and construction
engineering services for the Ynez Road Bridge (widen) over Santa Gertrudis Creek
Road Undercrossing — Project No. LD04-051 CO — and authorize the Mayor to
execute the agreement;
4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed
the 10% contingency amount of $4,857.00.
Development)
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Approve and accept the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Subdivision Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for additional storm drain
improvements for Tract Map No. 29305-1;
5.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the Improvement Agreement and file the Faithful
Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds.
6 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) — Property Acquisition and
TUMF Reimbursement Agreement
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Appropriate $1,423,408 from Tribal Association of Sovereign Indian Nation (TASIN)
funds and $4,000,000 from Transportation Uniform Mitigation FEE (TUMF) funds to
the 1-1 5/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of
right-of-way;
6.2 Approve an advance of $4,000,000 from Capital Reserves to the 1-15/SR 79 South
Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of right-of-way.
RECOMMENDATION:
7.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30798 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval;
7.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement;
7.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful
Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond and Monument Bond as security for
the agreements.
R:\Agenda\121404
Acceptance of Grant Deed — Harveston Community Park
RECOMMENDATION:
8.1 Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed for Harveston Community Park, located in
the Harveston development and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to
cause the deed to be recorded.
9 Police Department Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Program Grant Funding
RECOMMENDATION:
9.1 Increase estimated General Fund Grant Revenue by $29,220;
9.2 Appropriate $29,220 from General Fund Grant Revenue to the Police Department.
10 Resolution in Support of Legislation to Improve Infrastructure
(At the request of Councilman Stone.)
RECOMMENDATION:
10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE
INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
LEVEL
RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF
THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
AND
THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
R:Wgenda\121404
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. CSD 2004-01
Resolution: No. CSD 2004-15
CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington
ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of
Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar.
Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of
Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to
Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004.
Second Amendment to the Excel Landscape. Inc. — Maintenance Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. to
provide a 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of
$35,772.00 and to allow for the addition of new and supplemental landscape
maintenance service areas in the amount of $169,224.00;
RMgenda\121404
2.2 Authorize the annual expenditure of $1,397,340.00 for landscape maintenance
services for medians, facilities, sports parks, north slopes, south slopes, and new
and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas, and authorize the City
Manager to approve a 10% contingency for extra work items in the amount of
$139,734.00.
3 First Amendment to the Midori Gardens. Inc. — Maintenance Services Contract
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the First Amendment to the contract with Midori Gardens, Inc. to provide
a 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of $10,800.00
and to allow for the addition of new and supplemental landscape maintenance
service areas in the amount of $40,800.00;
3.2 Authorize the annual expenditure of $411,600.00 for landscape maintenance
services for neighborhood parks and new and supplemental landscape
maintenance service areas, and approve 10% contingency for extra work items
in the amount of $41,160.00.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, January 11, 2005, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
RAAgenda\121404
Next in Order:
Ordinance: No. RDA 2004-01
Resolution: No. RDA 2004-13
CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero
ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Stone, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the
Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent
Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the
Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink
"Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk
Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit
for individual speakers.
Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink
"Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please
come forward and state your name and address for the record.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004.
2 Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Component Unit
Financial Statements for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004.
R:Wgenda\121404
3
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Reject the bid proposal submitted by Pete & Sons Construction, Inc. for Project
No. PW02-20 — Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping;
3.2 Award a construction contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern
Gateway Landscaping to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of
$351,930.50 and authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract;
3.3 Award a maintenance contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern
Gateway Landscaping to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of
$3,600.00 and authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract;
3.4 Authorize the Executive Director to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $35,553.05 which is equal to 10% of the combined
contract amount;
3.5 Transfer $40,000.00 from the Escallier House Relocation to the Old Town
Southern Gateway Landscaping project construction account no. 280-190-833-
5804.
DEPARTMENTAL REPORT
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: Tuesday, January 11, 2005, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
RAgenda\121404
8
RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: City Council, Tuesday, January 11, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., City Council
Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
RECEPTION HONORING OUTGOING CITY COUNCILMAN AND
INCOMING SUPERVISOR -ELECT JEFF STONE
Music Provided by Eve Craig
R:Wgenda\121404
ITEM 1
ITEM 2
RESOLUTION NO. 04
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS
SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND
ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the
Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby
allowed in the amount of $927,550.42.
Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 14'" day of December, 2004.
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the
foregoing Resolution No. 04- was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Temecula on the 14`h day of December, 2004 by the following roll call vote:
AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS:
ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
R:/Resos 2004/Resos 04-
CITY OF TEMECULA
LIST OF DEMANDS
12/02/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 3 572,761.16
12/02/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 354,789.26
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/14/04 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 927,550.42
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
GENERALFUND
$ 469,394.90
165
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
5,065.26
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
53,427.23
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
83.74
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
3,849.24
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
702.44
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
11,649.50
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
3,058.46
300
INSURANCE FUND
430.80
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
18,047.64
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
2,319.15
340
FACILITIES
4,732.80
$ 572,761.16
001
GENERALFUND
$ 249,103.91
165
RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
5,467.34
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
59,967.49
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
114.92
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
4,755.52
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
820.99
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
3,055.34
300
INSURANCE FUND
727.76
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
20,842.73
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
3,122.38
340
FACILITIES
6,810.88
354,789.26
TOTAL BY FUND:
$ 927,550.42
PREPARED BY JADA YONKER, ACCOUNTING SPECIALIST
I
, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE
AND CORRECT.
GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
SHAW N NELSON, CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
'
LIST OF DEMANDS
12/02/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN:
$
572,761.16
12/02/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN:
354,789.26
TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 12/14/04 COUNCIL MEETING:
$
927,550.42
DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND:
CHECKS:
001
GENERAL FUND
$
469,394.90
165
RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
5,065.26
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
53,427.23
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
83.74
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
3,849.24
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
702.44
210
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND
11,649.50
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
3,058.46
300
INSURANCE FUND
430.80
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
18,047.64
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
2,319.15
340
FACILITIES
4,732.80
$
572,761.16
001
GENERAL FUND
$
249,103.91
165
RDA-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE
5,467.34
190
COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
59,967.49
192
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B
114.92
'
193
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C
4,755.52
194
TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D
820.99
280
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP
3,055.34
300
INSURANCE FUND
727.76
320
INFORMATION SYSTEMS
20,842.73
330
SUPPORTSERVICES
3,122.38
340
FACILITIES
6,810.88
354,789.26
TOTAL BY FUND:
$
927,550.42
PREPARED BY ADDA YONKER, CC/OUNTING SPECIALIST
I 'C �/�� %c-� ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
GENIE`RO DIRECYb
OF FINANCE
I , HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT.
SHAW N NELSON, CITY MANAGER
apChkLst
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 1
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
Check If
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
412
12/02/2004
000444 INSTATAX (EDD)
State Disability Ins Payment
17,748.84
17,748.84
413
12/02/2004
000283 INSTATAX (IRS)
Federal Income Taxes Payment
67,162.69
67,162.69
414
12/02/2004
001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SO
Nationwide Retirement Payment
16,617.97
16,617.97
415
12/02/2004
000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME
PERS ER Paid Member Contr Payme
89,729.09
89,729.09
416
12/02/2004
000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA),
OBRA - Project Retirement Payment
2,382.22
2,382.22
417
12/02/2004
000245 PERS (HEALTH INSUR. PREMIU
PERS Health Admin Cost Payment
57,173.99
57,173.99
96269
11/29/2004
000348 ZIGLER, GAIL
raffle prizes for holiday party: 1213
1,000.00
1,000.00
96270
12/02/2004
008142 A B C BOUNCE COMPANY
Jumpers for Breakfast w/Santa
383.00
383.00
96271
12/02/2004
003552 A F L A C
AFLAC Cancer Payment
1,757.80
1,757.80
96272
12/02/2004
001700 A PLUS TEACHING MATERIALS
CRC Tiny Tots Program
44.46
44.46
96273
12/02/2004
001515 ASAP
Citywide weed abatement svcs
7,401.00
7,401.00
96274
12/02/2004
004148 AT&T
Nov long distance svos: P.D.
93.77
93.77
96275
12/02/2004
005288 ADAMS, GREG
Reimb:Prev 1B Course:11/17-21
130.00
130.00
96276
12/02/2004
004064 ADELPHIA
Nov -Dec high speed internet svcs
40.95
40.95
96277
12/02/2004
002877 ALTA LOMA CHARTER LINES
Sister city visitors airport transportation
506.27
Sister city visitors airport transportation
375.94
882.21
96278
12/02/2004
008359 ALVAREZ, LINDA
Refund: Security deposit CRC 11/12
100.00
100.00
96279
12/02/2004
004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES
DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
378.45
378.45
96280
12/02/2004
008279 AMERICOMP INFOSYSTEMS I
Microsoft Office 2003: Police Dept
903.27
903.27
Page:1
apChkLst
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 2
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96281
12/02/2004
000101
APPLE ONE INC.
Temp Help PPE 11/13 Kasparian
518.40
Temp Help PPE 11/13 Buchanan
324.00
Temp help PPE 11/13 Torres
108.00
950.40
96282
12/02/2004
002381
BEAUDOIN, LINDA
Retirement Medical Payment
598.24
598.24
96283
12/02/2004
004262
BIO-TOX LABORATORIES
Oct DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
644.68
Oct DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
466.18
1,110.86
96284
12/02/2004
006721
BOISE CASCADE OFFICE
High back chair: Finance Admin
190.07
Office Supplies: Finance
20.81
Office supplies: Code Enforcement
13.20
Office Supplies: Finance
11.61
235.69
96285
12/02/2004
004176
BROADWING
Long distance & internet svcs
1,775.02
1,775.02
96286
12/02/2004
008366
BROMM, ROBERT AND PEGGY
Refund: Security Depst:TCC 7/26/04
100.00
100.00
96287
12/02/2004
006908
C C & COMPANY INC
Old Town Christmas entertainment
750.00
750.00
96288
12/02/2004
004462
C D W GOVERNMENT INC
PCI Serial Card for Traffic Division
961.54
961.54
96289
12/02/2004
000154
C S M F O
Award Prgm Application Fee
35.00
35.00
96290
12/02/2004
004248
CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE/ACCT
Sept DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
2,975.00
Aug DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening
2,450.00
Credit: Billed wrong agency
-1,330.00
4,095.00
96291
12/02/2004
003775
CHAPARRAL HIGH SCHOOL
Donation for wreath decorating
150.00
150.00
96292
12/02/2004
004837
CHERRY VALLEY FEED & PET
Dog Food for police K-9
59.80
59.80
96293
12/02/2004
008360
CIOTA, JORDAN
Reimb: EMT/Paramedic Certif.
75.00
76.00
96294
12/02/2004
004405
COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI
Community Health Charities Payment
158.00
158.00
96295
12/02/2004
002945
CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL
repair clr mh lamp: pala park
129.30
129.30
96296
12/02/2004
008365
CROWNE HILL RESERVE 29 LL
Refund: Overpmt of Permit Fees
13.27
13.27
96297
12/02/2004
002990
DAVID TURCH & ASSOCIATES
Dec Federal lobbyist svcs
3,000.00
3,000.00
Page2
apChkLst
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 3
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check if
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96298
12/02/2004
008364
E T C O INVESTMENTS
Refund: Overpmt of Permit Fees
880.35
880.35
96299
12/02/2004
005093
EAGLE'S PEAK CHARTER SCH
Refund: Security Depst: TCC 10/15
150.00
150.00
96300
12/02/2004
005692
ELMO, ANTHONY
Reimb:lnt'I Code Council:9/26-28/04
65.84
65.84
96301
12/02/2004
006487
EUROPEAN CAFE & VINEYARD
Refreshments: Dutch Police Visit
235.70
235.70
96302
12/02/2004
000165
FEDERAL EXPRESS INC
Express mail services
313.68
313.68
96303
12/02/2004
008363
FERNS, JAY
Refund: Overpmt for Plan check fees
72.00
72.00
96304
12/02/2004
000166
FIRST AMERICAN TITLE
Lot Book Report: Johnson
75.00
Lot Book Report: Russo
75.00
Lot Book Report: Bogdanski
75.00
Lot Book Report: Cockrell
75.00
Lot Book Report: Cavazos
75.00
Lot Book Report: Chiarelli
75.00
Lot Book Report: Sebanc
75.00
Lot Book Report: Delaney
75.00
600.00
96305
12/02/2004
002982
FRANCHISE TAX BOARD
Support Payment
261.46
261.46
96306
12/02/2004
008362
FUNES, MARTHA
Refund: Security depst: TCC 6/2104
100.00
100.00
96307
12t02r2004
000173
GENERAL BINDING CORPORAT
Copy Ctr binding & lamination supplie
29.63
29.63
96308
12/02/2004
008361
GRAPE STOMPERS SO DANCE
Refund: TCC Hall rental cancellation
75.00
75.00
96309
12/02/2004
000520
H D L COREN & CONE INC
Oct -Dec Property tax consulting srvcs
3,600.00
3,600.00
96310
12/02/2004
001135
HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL GRID
New Hire Pre -employment physicals
155.00
155.00
96311
12/02/2004
005811
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPAN
Laser Jet Printer Stand/Dolly:CIP
368.51
368.51
96312
12/02/2004
002107
HIGHMARK INC
Voluntary Supp Life Insurance
622.70
622.70
96313
12JO212004
007449
HOUSER, GARY
Reimb Agnnnt Pmt:Soundwall Impry
815.00
815.00
Page3
apChkLst
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 4
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96314
12/02/2004
004525
HUMANSCALE CORPORATION
Setup HR ergonomic wrkstn
203.88
203.88
96315
12/02/2004
000194
1 C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45
1 C M A Retirement Trust 457 Paymen
7,207.92
7,207.92
96316
12/02/2004
001407
INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I
Pool sanitizing chemicals
171.65
171.65
96317
12/02/2004
004862
INTL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS I
Prgss pmt:Citywide Concrete Repairs
150,624.00
150,624.00
96318
12/02/2004
000750
INTOXIMETERS INC
Repair police alcohol sensor
95.84
95.84
96319
12/02/2004
004908
JIFFY LUBE 1878
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
33.50
33.50
96320
12/02/2004
002424
KELLEY DISPLAY INC
Banner Pgrm:RDA Car Show
174.98
174.98
96321
12/02/2004
004062
KUSTOM SIGNALS INC
Battery charger for radar trailer
289.12
289.12
96322
12/02/2004
000869
LAW RENCE W ELK RESORT TH
12/16 Sr Excursion:Welk Christ
675.00
675.00
96323
12/02I2004
004905
LIEBERT, CASSIDY & W HITMOR
Oct HR legal svcs for TE060400001
4,851.00
4,851.00
96324
12/02/2004
003726
LIFE ASSIST INC
Supplies For Paramedic Squad
345.00
Supplies For Paramedic Squad
147.24
492.24
96325
12/02/2004
003782
MAIN STREET SIGNS
Street Name Sign "City Of Temecula"
26.66
26.66
96326
12/02/2004
003076
MET LIFE INSURANCE
Met Life Dental Payment
8,084.64
8,084.64
96327
12/02/2004
001905
MEYERS, DAVID WILLIAM
TCSD Instructor Earnings
416.00
416.00
96328
12/02/2004
004894
MICHAEL BRANDMAN ASSOCIA
8/28-9/24/04 SvGS:Pech. Pkwy Ph
1,073.50
1,073.50
96329
12/02/2004
008354
MICHELLE SHERRY
setup fee:photography svcs: 12/3/04
125.00
125.00
96330
12/02/2004
007096
MUSICIANS WORKSHOP
Community Service Funding Award
5,000.00
5,000.00
96331
12/02/2004
001986
MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALIFORN
Dec "On -Hold" Phone Music:Cit
120.86
120.86
PageA
apChkLst
1210212004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 5
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96332
12/02/2004
000727
NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION
2005 membership:H.W.:2915497X
135.00
135.00
96333
12/02/2004
008367
NEWMAN, OLIVIA C
Refund:Sec. Deposit:CRC 8/10/04
100.00
100.00
96334
12/02/2004
002105
OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
260.68
City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs
141.83
402.51
96335
12/02/2004
002256
P & D CONSULTANTS INC
Oct temp help bldg inspector: R.H.
10,881.36
10,881.36
96336
12/02/2004
005850
PAISNER, WILLIAM
Refund:Sec. Deposit:CRC 11/06/04
100.00
100.00
96337
1210=004
004074
PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN
supplies for TCSD holiday events
72.72
72.72
96338
12/02/2004
000733
PARTY PZAZZ
linen rental:Veteran's Mem. dedication
58.74
linen rental: Japan Garden Dedication
9.79
68.53
96339
12/02/2004
001958
PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG
PERS Long Tenn Care Payment
288.55
288.55
96340
12/02/2004
000249
PETTY CASH
Petty Cash Reimbursement
502.75
Petty Cash Reimbursement
336.68
839.43
96341
12/02/2004
001999
PITNEY BOW ES
Jan -Mar postage meter rental
269.11
269.11
96342
12/02/2004
002185
POSTMASTER - TEMECULA
Dec Community Newsletter postage
4,080.00
4,080.00
96343
12/02/2004
005820
PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES I
Prepaid Legal Services Payment
359.75
359.75
96344
12/02/2004
004792
R H A LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT
Oct dsgn svcs: Pablo Apis Park
325.00
325.00
96345
12/02/2004
002612
RADIO SHACK INC
misc. supplies: I.S. Dpt
34.96
34.96
96346
12/02/2004
000262
RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST
Various Water Meters
433.89
Nov 01-08-38009-0 Fire Stn 92
41.90
475.79
96347
12/02/2004
003591
RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE
Clean-up Channels @ var. locations
2,100.00
2,100.00
96348
12/02/2004
008370
REYES, LUCINA
Refund:Sec. Deposit:TCC
100.00
100.00
96349
12/02/2004
007402
RICHARD BRADY & ASSOCIATE
Oct Dsgn Svcs: Maint Fee Expansion
9,436.00
9,436.00
Pages
apChkLst
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
Final Check List
CITY OF TEMECULA
Page: 6
Bank:
union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check#
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96350
12/02/2004
003072
RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS
Community Service Funding Award
5,000.00
5,000.00
96351
12/02/2004
000418
RIVERSIDE CO CLERK &
Oct Copy Fees: PW/RDA
12.00
12.00
96352
12/02/2004
001592
RIVERSIDE CO INFO
Oct emerg. radio rentals: Police
627.00
627.00
96353
12/02/2004
000955
RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFF SW ST
Fall Rod Run patrol svcs:10/9/04
12,120.60
Race for Cure patrol svc:10/17/04
4,422.49
Tractor Race patrol svc:10/2-3/04
3,830.16
Polling Place Security:11/2/04
1,714.12
22,087.37
96354
12/02/2004
003587
RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC
add'I electrical work: O.T. Front Street
750.00
750.00
96355
12/02/2004
000873
ROBERTS, RONALD H.
Reimb:Nakayama trip: 10/31-11/9
95.34
95.34
96356
12/02/2004
007582
SAFEGUARD DENTAL & VISION
Safe Guard Vision Plan Payment
992.18
992.18
96357
12/02/2004
005227
SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF
Support Payment
25.00
25.00
96358
12/02/2004
006815
SAN DIEGO, COUNTY OF
Support Payment
12.50
12.50
96359
12/02/2004
003492
SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
fall sports poster sponsor ad: NHS
100.00
100.00
96360
12/02t2004
003492
SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
ftbll prgm/media guide spnsr ad:CHS
100.00
100.00
96361
12/02/2004
003492
SCHOLASTIC SPORTS
ftbll prgm/media guide spnsr ad:GOH
100.00
100.00
96362
12/02/2004
004609
SHREDFORCE INC
Nov doc shred svcs: Rcrds Mgmt
110.00
Nov doc shred svcs: O.T. P.D. Stn
24.00
134.00
96363
12/02/2004
000645
SMART & FINAL INC
holiday supplies:tcsd special events
196.09
196.09
96364
12/02/2004
000537
SO CALIF EDISON
Nov 2-02-351-4946 Sr Center
729.57
Nov 2-18-937-3152 T. Museum
572.63
Nov 2-22-891-0550 various mtrs
306.17
Nov 2-11-007-0455 6th Street
274.49
Nov 2-20-817-9929 O.T. P.D. Stn
168.64
Nov 2-21-911-7892 O.T. Prk Lot
149.88
Nov 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chpl
74.28
Nov 2-21-981-4720 Hwy 79
61.37
Nov 2-14-204-1615 Front St Rdio
27.76
2,364.79
Pages
apChkLst
Final Check List
Page: 7
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
Check Total
96365
12/02/2004
001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY
Nov City facilities gas meters
3,756.21
Nov 095-167-7907-2 Fire Sin 84
205.10
3,961.31
96366
12/02/2004
005786 SPRINT
10/15-11/14/04 Acct Level Chrgs
36.56
36.56
96367
12/02/2004
000293 STADIUM PIZZA
Refreshments:Tcc Training:
116.51
Rfrshmnts:fall skaters challenge 10/16
74.89
191.40
96368
12/02/2004
007762 STANDARD OF OREGON
Mandatory Life Insurance Payment
2,502.50
2,602.50
96369
12/02/2004
005607 STORCHHEIM, ROBERT
bldg dept newsletter subscription
38.00
38.00
96370
12/02/2004
000305 TARGET STORE
supplies for TCSD holiday events
37.69
supplies for TCSD holiday events
15.06
52.75
96371
12/02/2004
008371 TEA (THEMED ENTERTAINMEN
THEA awards banquet:TCSD staff
1,800.00
1,800.00
96372
12/02/2004
001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911
Union Dues Payment
3,808.00
3,808.00
96373
12/02/2004
006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR
Paramedic vehicle maint/repair
2,793.15
Repair GEM vehicle: Police
2,619.11
Repair GEM vehicle xx975: Police
2,350.81
7,763.07
96374
12/02/2004
000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED S
Oct vehicle fuel usage: PW
594.76
Oct vehicle fuel usage: B&S Dpt
325.56
Oct vehicle fuel usage: PW Maint
157.84
Sep vehicle fuel usage: Police
15.32
1,093.48
96375
12/02/2004
003849 TERRYBERRY COMPANY
svc award pins/safe driving pins
1,060.37
1,060.37
96376
12/02/2004
005873 TRI AD ACTUARIES INC
Child Care Reimbursement Payment
7,180.77
7,180.77
96377
12/02/2004
000325 UNITED WAY
United Way Charities Payment
368.00
368.00
96378
12/02/2004
004819 UNUM LIFE INS. CO. OF AMERI
Long Term Disability Payment
6,839.20
6,839.20
96379
12/02/2004
008369 VALDEZ, ELLEN
Refund:Kids Love Soccer
35.00
35.00
96380
12/02/2004
004261 VERIZON
Nov xxx-2016 general usage
217.83
Nov xxx-3526 fire alarm
84.65
Nov xxx-2676 general usage
28.22
330.70
96381
12/02/2004
004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION
Internet svcs @ O.T. P.D. Stn
42.35
42.35
Page:?
apChkLst
Final Check List
12/02/2004
4:03:19PM
CITY OF TEMECULA
Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(Continued)
Check #
Date
Vendor
Description
Amount Paid
96382
12/02/2004
007208 VINCES SPAGHETTI EXPRESS
Refreshments:TCC training:t 1/13104
172.60
96383
12/02/2004
008368 VOGT, KAREN
Refund:Cake Decoration -Kids
5.00
96384
12/02/2004
003063 WEAVER PACIFIC PUBLICATI
w/s & s/f San Diego pocket guides
6,292.80
96385
12/02/2004
004774 WOODCREST UNIFORMS
telescoping stock equip: Police
384.83
Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA:
Page: 8
Check Total
172.60
5.00
6,292.80
384.83
572,761.16
PageB
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/ City Council
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2004
PREPARED BY: Jason Simpson, Assistant Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial
Statements, Auditor's Report, and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for Fiscal Year
Ended June 30, 2004.
BACKGROUND: As a result of a new accounting rule, Governmental and Accounting
Standards Board's (GASB) Statement Number 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management's
Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for State and Local Governments, the City is required to change
the presentation of its annual financial statements and analysis effective with the fiscal year ending
June 30, 2003. This is the second year the City has presented its financial results in this format.
Staff has reviewed and approved the reports with Diehl, Evans & Company, LLP.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR)
ITEM 4
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: 14William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Professional Services Agreement for Bridge Inspection Services — Parsons
Brinkerhoff Construction Services, Inc.
Ynez Road Bridge (Widen) over Santa Gertrudis Creek — LD04-051 CO
PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer - Capital Projects
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Approve an agreement with Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services, Inc. in an amount not to
exceed $48,577 for professional bridge inspection and construction engineering services for the
Ynez Road Bridge (Widen) over Santa Gertrudis Creek Road Undercrossing, Project No. LD04-
051CO, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement.
2. Authorize the City Manager to approve amendments to the agreement not to exceed the 10%
contingency amount of $4,857.00.
BACKGROUND: In gaining approval of the Harveston Development, the developer, Lennar
Communities, was conditioned to provide numerous offsite improvements. The widening of the Ynez
Road Bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek is one of several conditioned improvements Lennar will be
completing to mitigate the traffic impacts of the Harveston Development.
Due to the specialized nature of bridge construction, it is necessary to supplement the public works
inspection staff with a Bridge Inspector and Bridge Construction Engineer. Staff solicited proposals
from 3 firms that employee individuals that have the specific expertise needed. Of the two firms that
responded, Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services (PB) was selected to provide the needed
services based upon the unique qualifications of their staff, their demonstrated capability with similar
projects in the Inland Empire, and their demonstrated project understanding.
FISCAL IMPACT: The professional services for the Ynez Road Bridge (Widen) over Santa
Gertrudis Creek will be funded with inspection fees collected from the Developer, which will ultimately
be reimbursed from Harveston CFD bond proceeds. The current authorization for this professional
services agreement is $53,434.00, which includes the agreement in the amount of $48,577.00 plus a
10% contingency of $4,857. Adequate funds will be available in Account No. 001-2618.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Agreement with Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services, Inc.
2. Project Location
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\121404\PB Bndgelnsp.Agr.DOC
AGREEMENT
FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTANT SERVICES
YNEZ ROAD BRIDGE (WIDEN) OVER SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK
LD04-051 CO
THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of December 14, 2004, between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction
Services, Inc. ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on December 14, 2004, and shall
remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, but in no event later than
December 31, 2005, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement.
2. SERVICES. Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and
set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant
shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit
A.
3. PERFORMANCE. Consultant shall at all time faithfully, competently and to
the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Consultant
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
4. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the
Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of
per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of
Industrial Relations' Internet web site at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Consultant shall provide a copy of
prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage
rates as a minimum. Consultant shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776,
1777.5,1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code,
Consultant shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion
thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing
rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of
the provisions of the Contract.
5. PAYMENT.
a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A, Payment Rates and Schedule,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon
actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit A other than the scope of work to be
performed, payment rates and schedule of payment are null and void. This amount shall not exceed
Forty Eight Thousand Five Hundred Seventy Seven Dollars and No Cents ($48,577.00) forthe
total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement.
R:\Agreements\HarvestonCFD\Parsons Princkerhoff Agrmt
b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection
with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such
additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Consultant shall
be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City
Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the
performance of said services.
The City Manager may approve additional work up to ten percent (10%) of the amount of the
Agreement or twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this
amount shall be approved by the City Council.
C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed.
Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services
provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of consultant's fees it shall give written
notice to Consultant within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the
invoice.
6. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the consultant at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 4.
7. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, City shall have no obligation or dutyto continue compensating Consultantfor any work
performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice
to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work
hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of
the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant
with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
8. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS.
a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to
sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the
performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of
services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be
maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identi-
fied and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its
designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and
audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and
shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this
Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of
three (3) years after receipt of final payment.
b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this
Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data
generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the
services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and
may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant.
With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make
available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software
and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files.
9. INDEMNIFICATION. The Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect
and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, including attorney fees and expert
witness fees, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may
sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to
property arising out of Consultant's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions arising out of or in any
way related to the performance or non-performance of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising
out of the negligence of the City.
10. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Consultant shall procure and maintain for
the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property,
which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the
Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form
No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88.
(2) Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01
06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the
Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to
the General Liability policy described above is acceptable.
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no
employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's
compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute
a declaration that it has no employees.
(4) Professional L iability I nsurance s hall b e w ritten o n a p olicy f orm
providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than:
(1) General Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per occurrence for
bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial
General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate
limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately
to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident
for bodily injury and property damage.
(3) Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California;
Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for
bodily injury or disease.
(4) Professional Liability coverage: Two million ($2,000,000) per claim
and in aggregate.
C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Consultant shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insured's as respects: liability arising out of activities
performed by or on behalf of the Consultant; products and completed
operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant's insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
R:VAareements\HawestonCFD\Parsons Princkerhoff Aarmt
(4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured
against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self
insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements.
f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant s hall f urnish t he C ity w ith o riginal
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the
coverage required by these specifications.
11. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR.
a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent
contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant
shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its
officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any
of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant
shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are
in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the
power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner.
b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the
Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing
services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to
Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
12. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all
local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those
employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The
Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations.
The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned byfailure
of the Consultant to comply with this section.
13. RELEASE OF INFORMATION.
a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall
be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written
authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written
authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide
declarations, I etters o f s upport, testimony a t d epositions, response t o i nterrogatories o r other
information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or
property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered
"voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena.
b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers,
employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of
deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery
request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed
there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City retains the right,
but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar
proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to
review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review
any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said
response.
14. NOTICES. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
parry under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be
effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following
deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above.
To City: City of Temecula
Mailing Address:
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, California 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Consultant: Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services Inc.
505 South Main Street, Suite 900
Orange, California 92868
Attention: Kim Evans, Project Administrator
15. ASSIGNMENT. The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without priorwritten consent of the
City. Because of the personal nature of the services to be rendered pursuant to this Agreement,
only Rey Nocon and/or Charles Brownyard shall perform the services described in this Agreement.
Rey Nocon and/or Charles Brownyard, may use assistants, undertheir direct supervision, to perform
some of the services under this Agreement. Consultant shall provide City fourteen (14) days' notice
prior to the departure of Rey Nocon and/or Charles Brownyard from Consultant's employ. Should he
or she leave Consultant's employ, the City shall have the option to immediately terminate this
Agreement, within three (3) days of the close of said notice period. Upon termination of this
Agreement, Consultant's sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to,
and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City
Council and the Consultant.
16. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall
have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services
described in this Agreement.
17. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Consultant understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties
to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning
this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic
jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the
other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's
judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted.
18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the
Contractor, or Contractor's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year
thereafter. The Contractor hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of
the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise,
in this transaction, or in the business of the Contractor or Contractor's sub -contractors on this
project. Contractor further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered
whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement.
19. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
20. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the
authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind
Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
Michael S. Naggar, Mayor
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONSULTANT
Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc
505 S. Main Street, Suite 900
Orange, CA 92868
(714)564-2719
Glen Suitor, Sr. Vice President
Charlie Herndon, Sr. Vice President
(Two Signatures of Corporate Officers Required For Corporations)
EXHIBIT A
TASKS TO BE PERFORMED
AND
PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE
Bridge Construction Services for
Ynez Road Improvements
Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening
R:\Agreements\Ha"estonCFD\Parsons Princkerhoff Agrmt
YERflS®
November 16, 2004
Mr. Greg Butler
Principal Engineer
City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Parsons 707 Broadway
Brinkerhoff Suite 1600
San Diego, CA 92101
619-338-9376
Fax: 619-338-8123
NOV 1 8 2004
RE: Bridge Construction Services for Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening Project
Dear Mr. Butler:
Per your recent conversation with Rey Nocon, Parsons Brinckerhoff Construction Services, Inc. (PB)
is pleased to submit our letter of interest to provide professional bridge construction management
services for the Ynez Road - Street Improvements - Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening Project.
Ranked #2 in the nation by Engineering News Record (ENR), PB specializes solely in Construction
Management (CM) and Inspection services. The majority of our work is on transportation
infrastructures and capital improvements particularly bridges, interchange reconstructions, roadway
realignment and widening and water conveyance.
The key to our services is our available highly qualified staff. With a CM staff including 200 in the
Western U.S. and over 70 in Southern California, PB has an extensive pool of resources from which
to draw. PB personnel have had the privilege of providing CM and PM services as an extension of
City staff on numerous local projects. Activities have included resident engineering, on -call
inspection, constructibililty reviews, specification development, review of construction bid
documents, project controls, and utilities coordination. We can offer the City a CM staff extremely
familiar with local conditions, contractors, designers, utilities and stakeholder agencies.
Attached you will find our cost proposal, as well as resumes of Rey Nocon, P.E. and Chuck
Brownyard; staff available to support the City's project. We look forward to the opportunity to provide
services to the City of Temecula. If you have additional questions please contact me or Rey Nocon
at 619-247-4410.
Sincerely,
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
G� or -R.l (r. •,.� � ,r,
Donald W. Olson
Vice President, Area Manager
Over a Century of
Engineering Excellence
=
COST PROPOSAL
moo
YEARS
For
Ynez Road Street Improvements, Santa
Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening
From:
PARSONS BRINCKERHOFF CONSTRUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Approved: W 11AZI Date: November 16, 2004
Glenn W. Suitor, Senior Vice President
To:
City of Temecula
November 16, 2004
Scope of Services
1- Review working drawings for deck forming, shoring, pier and abutment formwork
2- Perform as -built survey of existing bridge, prepare deck contours (4-scale)
3- Prepare grades for abut/pier wall and deck construction
4- Prepare grades for barrier rail construction
5- Provide full-time inspection for
a pile driving
b concrete pours for footings, abutment/pier walls, diaphragms, bridge deck
c deck grinding
d barrier rail
6- Provide part-time inspection, as needed, for all other bridge activities listed on staffing schedule.
Prepared by PBCS, Inc. 11/17/2004 Page 1
PBCS COST PROPOSAL SUMMARY
Ynez Road Street Improvements, Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening
City of Temecula
Project Start:
Project End:
Duration (months):
1-Dec-04
8-Apr-05
4.3
1) BURDENED LABOR COSTS
REGULAR TIME
2) DIRECT EXPENSES:
$44,548
TOTAL BURDENED LABOR COST
..;........y. _._,.�_. _ ...
Fee @ 3% $117
TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES
TOTAL $48,577
Prepared by PBCS, Inc. 11/17/2004
Page 1
gI
PBCS HOURLY RATE / COST SCHEDULE
Ynez Road Street Improvements, Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening
City of Temecula
Project Start: 1-Dec-04
Project End: 8-Apr-OS
Duration (months): 4.3
POSITION NAME FIRM
December 1, 2004 to April 8, 2005
BURDENED
TOTAL WA GE
I HOURS COST"
HRS
YEAR 1
BILLING
RATE
I DIRECT
WAGES
1
Project
Manager/Engineer
lRey Nocon
PB
52
133.00
$6,916.00
52
$6,916
2
n ge nspe or
Chuck Brown ar
PB
392
96.00
37 632.00
392
37 632
444 $44,548 11 444 $44,548
$44,548
Prepared by PBCS, Inc. 11/17/2004 Page 1
PBCS ESTIMATED DIRECT EXPENSES
Vnez Road street Improvements, Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge Widening
City of Temecula
Project Start: 1-Dec-04
Project End: Ill
Duration (months): 4.3
UNIT
UNIT QTY COST ($) SUBTOTAL ($) TOTAL ($)
A) LEASED VEHICLES/O&M
Ford Escape Project Manager/Engineer Months 4 50 $200
Ford 150 PU Bridge Inspector Months 4 443 $1,772
Fuel LS 1 1,500 $1,500
$3,472
B) FIELD EQUIPMENT
Monthly Nextel Service Months 4 60 $240
$240
C) MISCELLANEOUS TOOL / EQUIPMENT
Tools/Equipment LS 1 200 $200
$200
TOTAL DIRECT EXPENSES $3,912
Prepared by PBCS, Inc. 11117/20D4 Page 1
REY NOCON, P.E.
Project Manager/Engineer
Years of Experience
19
Education
B.S., Civil Engineering, San Diego State University, June 1983
Professional Affiliations
American Society of Civil Engineers
Professional Registrations
Professional Engineer: California, 1986 (#41000)
Key Qualifications
Rey Nocon has nearly two decades of engineering experience specializing in design and
construction management of major infrastructure projects. He has served as resident engineer
on several multimillion -dollar construction contracts for both mass transit rail and highway
projects. Rey also has extensive experience in project development, having served as project
manager for the preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E) for numerous bridge
design projects. He has conducted constructibility reviews on a wide range of projects,
including interchanges, seismic retrofits, bridge widening, and roadway construction. Prior to
joining Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB), Rey served 10 years with the California Department of
Transportation (Caltrans) Division of Structures, working primarily on structures construction
projects, where he gained in-depth knowledge of Caltrans policies and procedures.
Experience
• Various Caltrans Projects, California: project engineer for numerous Caltrans retrofit design
projects. Rey performed earthquake analysis of various structure types, including steel,
concrete box, and precast box superstructures as well as construction feasibility studies for
all retrofit PS&E prepared by the bridge design consultant.
• Montezuma Road Overcrossing: project manager for the design of a $3.4M two span
prestressed concrete box girder structure. Design details incorporated staged construction
and analysis utilized Caltrans design criteria and procedures. Rey prepared complete
project plans, specifications, and estimates, and provided construction support. The
structure was successfully constructed with no complications.
Bridge Resident Engineer, Various Projects, California: provided resident engineer services
for several projects, including Rancheros Drive Bridge, a $1 M 260-foot-long structure
spanning a large waterway; Marshall Avenue retaining wall, a $70.000 tieback anchor wall;
and Harbor Drive Bridge, a $700,000 bridge replacement. He conducted construction
feasibility studies for several design projects, including 40th Street Overcrossing structures,
Mission Valley East LRT structures, and seismic retrofit projects.
Route 52 Extension, California: bridge resident engineer for this $25M, 3-mile long state
highway construction project. Project included eight multi -span prestressed concrete box
girder bridges, retaining and sound walls, and radio towers, all constructed through native,
environmentally sensitive terrain. Rey supervised a team of seven bridge engineers
conducting contract administration, performing field inspections, and providing technical
support for the structures construction. He identified and resolved numerous construction
conflicts under conditions in which the contractor utilized an accelerated 60-hour/week work
schedule to allow operations to proceed without delay.
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
Nocon
Interstate 8/Route 125 Interchange, San Diego, California: bridge resident engineer on this
multi -contract project to reconstruct and expand a freeway -to -freeway interchange.
Construction involved 28 multi -span bridges of various structure types, two miles of retaining
walls, temporary detour bridges, and several bridge demolitions. The interchange was
constructed over a 10-year period, requiring complex stage construction and traffic
detouring, with nearly all bridge work constructed over traffic.
San Ysidro Intermodal Transit Center, San Ysidro, California: project manager and resident
engineer on this $13M project that involves new platforms for the Trolley, bus, taxi and jitney
vehicles, realignment of the LRT track, a temporary shoofly, retaining walls, freeway ramp
modifications, a new parking lot, a pedestrian bridge, utility relocations and landscaping. PB
is providing constructibility review and CM services. Rey is responsible for the management
and conduct of all field CM services, including three local subconsultants.
Mission Valley East Light Rail Transit (LRT), San Diego, California: construction engineer for
the final design of a $176M, 5.8-mile (9.3-kilometer) LRT extension for the Metropolitan Transit
Development Board (MTDB). Rey oversaw the construction aspects of the final design,
including contract scheduling and estimating, constructibility reviews, construction staging,
and specifications. Project elements included heavy bridge construction, interchange
modifications, channel improvements, and track and systems work constructed under four
construction contracts.
Mission Valley West LRT, San Diego, California: bridge resident engineer for both the Morena
Segment and Stadium Segment contracts for this LRT construction project. Rey was
responsible for the construction management of the structures element of the projects,
consisting of three miles of elevated track structure, cast -in -place and mechanically stabilized
earth walls, elevated stations, transit structures, and utility structures, with a total construction
value of $60M. He supervised a team of 18 field staff to perform inspection, testing,
surveying, reviews of contractor construction systems, and other construction engineering
tasks. Rey also facilitated several constructibility sessions over the course of construction to
resolve major problem areas so as to maintain project schedule.
Mission Valley West Morena Segment, San Diego, California: resident engineer responsible
for construction management, contract administration, and quality assurance for this $63M,
3.1-mile LRT extension. Construction consisted of 1.5 miles of elevated LRT structure, three
stations, 2 miles of 78-inch sewer line, major grading and utilities, and a 15-acre
environmental mitigation site. Construction management required significant railroad
coordination with existing Amtrak and regional rail commuter lines. Constructed ballasted
track for the at -grade sections, direct fixation track for elevated structures, and overhead
catenary system for the traction power. Rey provided extensive interfacing with
environmental personnel, city agencies, local community, and news media. The project was
completed under budget and 2 months ahead of schedule.
PARSONS
BR/NCKERNOFF
CHARLES "CHUCK" BROWNYARD
Bridge Inspector
Years of Experience
41
Education
A.A., Math and Engineering, San Diego City College, 1965
Key Qualifications
Charles Brownyard is a senior inspector with over four decades of experience, the majority in the
San Diego area. Prior to joining PB, his entire career was spent working for Caltrans serving in
various roles, including Bridge Construction, Inspector, Survey Party Chief, and Field Supervisor.
Charles has extensive experience in field engineering, inspection for bridge and structures
construction, surveying, and the implementation of Caltrans procedures for inspection.
Experience
• San Ysidro Intermodal Transit Center, San Ysidro, San Diego, California: senior inspector on
this $13M project which involves new platforms for the Trolley, bus, taxi and jitney vehicles,
realignment of the LRT track, a temporary shoofly, retaining walls, freeway ramp modifications,
a new parking lot, a pedestrian bridge, a reinforced box culvert, extensive utility relocations
and landscaping. Charles' responsibilities include field inspection of construction activities,
contract administration, and preparing field reports.
• Caltrans Division of Structures Construction. For 32 years Charles served as Bridge
Construction Inspector on numerous infrastructure construction projects in District 11 (San
Diego, Imperial, and San Bernardino Counties.) Projects included bridge widenings,
freeways, interchange renovations, and light rail extensions, all ranging in construction cost
from $1M to $130M. Charles was responsible for field inspection of construction activities and
supervision of field staff. Duties included performing contract administration, preparing field
reports, providing technical support to structures construction, reviewing falsework drawings,
shoring, and other construction submittals, measuring and preparing progress payment
quantities, and supporting preparation of change orders. Projects included:
- I-8/Route 25 Interchange, La Mesa, CA, $130M
- Route Freeway Extension, San Diego, CA, $25M
- Coronado Bridge Retrofit, San Diego, CA, $5M
- I-8/Route 67 Interchange, El Cajon, CA, $20M
- 1-5/1-8 Bridge Retrofit, San Diego, CA, $20M
- 1-805 Viaduct, San Diego, CA, $15M
- MTDB South Line, Chula Vista, CA, $20M
Caltrans - Division of Highways. Charles served as a survey party chief and field surveyor for
six years on various engineering and construction projects in District 11. Tasks included
preliminary surveys, construction staking, and monumentation surveys.
PARSONS
BR/NCKERHOFF
a
Q
J
N
O
O
Z
ITEM 5
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANC
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: /William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Bonds and Agreement for Additional Storm Drain Improvements in
Tract No. 29305-1 (East of Pechanga Parkway and South of Loma Linda
Road in the Wolf Creek Development)
PREPARED BY;�nald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
ve Charette, Associate Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
APPROVE AND ACCEPT the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Subdivision
Faithful Performance and Labor & Materials Bonds as security for additional storm drain
improvements for Tract Map 29305-1.
2. DIRECT the City Clerk to record the Improvement Agreement and File the Faithful
Performance and Labor & Material Bonds.
BACKGROUND: Tract 29305-1 is a twenty-two (22) lot subdivision located north of Wolf
Valley Road and east of Pechanga Parkway within the Wolf Creek Development. On December
13, 2003, the City Council approved Tract Map No. 29305-1, and entered into Subdivision
Improvement Agreements with Standard Pacific Homes. Subsequent to recordation of the map
it was determined that additional storm drain improvements would be needed for the Wolf Creek
Development. The additional improvements are requirements of the Water Quality Control
Board and consist of a system of stormceptors that will collect pollutants from storm runoff
before the runoff enters downstream channels. The agreement and bonds have been submitted
by the developer to guarantee the construction of the stormceptors proposed to be constructed
with Tract 29305-1.
The following lists the additional bonds for drainage improvements and agreement secured by
Standard Pacific Homes and posted by Safeco Insurance Company of America:
Faithful Performance Bond No. 6304125 in the amount of $166,500 to cover stormceptor
drainage improvements.
Labor and Materials Bond No. 6304125 in the amount of $83,500 to secure labor and
materials.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
i
R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2004\121404\TM29305-1.BondsandAgreement.Stormeeptors.DOC
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Project Vicinity Map
2. Subdivision Improvement Agreement (on file)
3. Subdivision Faithful Performance Bond (on file)
4. Subdivision Labor and Material Bond (on file)
2
RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\121404\TM29305-1.BondsandAgreement.Stormceptors.DOC
I
W
H
U
W
r CY-
z
LC) o-
U 3
W
CY)0-
N Wo d
n a
. o �
O w . .', QQ OR
z z
W �
U_
ry o �
U
to
Q J yeti
ry 3: Y6
V
ITEM 6
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANG
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: 4illiam
Ciity Manager/City Council
FROM: G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08)
Property Acquisition and TUMF Reimbursement Agreement
PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
Appropriate $1,423,408 from Tribal Association of Sovereign Indian Nation (TASIN)
funds and $4,000,000 from Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) funds to the I-
15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of right-of-
way.
2. Approve an advance of $4,000,000 from Capital Reserves to the 1-15/SR 79 South
Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of right-of-way.
BACKGROUND: On October 26, 2004, the City Council approved staff's recommendation
to enter into a purchase agreement with Margarita Canyon, LLC for Assessor's Parcel Nos. 922-
210-060, 922-210-061 and 922-210-052 for the purpose of acquiring the necessary right-of-way
for the future 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project. The property is currently in
escrow for the appraised valuation of $7,105,000, plus escrow fees and closing costs.
As indicated in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP), revenues are identified for the
purchase of this property through a combination of Tribal Association of Sovereign Indian Nation
(TASIN) funds, and the Crown Hill and Morgan Hill Community Facilities Districts (CFD's). In
September 2004, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) approved the City's
request for reimbursement of Regional TUMF Funding in the amount of $4,000,000 for right-of-
way acquisition. It should be noted that at the time the CIP budget was prepared, TUMF was
not anticipated as a viable funding source for this project in FY 2004-05. Upon completion of
escrow, staff will execute the necessary documents for reimbursement of the $4,000,000
through the TUMF Reimbursement Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: The 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) is identified
in the City's Capital Improvement Program for FY 2005-09. Funding of $2,175,000 is currently
available from the Crown Hill and Morgan Hill CFD's. In order to acquire the right-of-way for
the project, it is necessary to appropriate $1,423,408 from Tribal Association of Sovereign
Indian Nation (TASIN) funds and advance $4,000,000 from Capital Reserves to the 1-15/SR 79
South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08). Upon execution of the TUMF Reimbursement
Agreement with RCTC, the City will receive a reimbursement of the $4,000,000.
ATTACHMENTS: None
RAagdrpt\2004\121404.PW 04-08115-SR79SInterchangeReimburseAgr
ITEM 7
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: t4/illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 30798, Located North of Highway 79 South, East of Avenida
De Missiones, and the future Rancho Pueblo Road, known as Rancho
Community Church.
PREPARED BY: WRonald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Chris White, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 30798 in
conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Improvement Agreement 3)
Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Material
Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements.
BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 30798 is North of Highway 79 South and Constance
Street. The project was formally tract 15211 and Rancho Community Church is mapping over it.
On April 24, 2003 the City of Temecula Planning Commission approved Parcel Map No. 30798 and
the appropriate conditions of approvals.
Parcel Map No. 30798 is sixteen (16) commercial parcels. The tract is located North of Highway 79
South, West of Avenida De Missions and future Rancho Pueblo Road. The site is currently vacant.
The owners of the property:
Rancho Community (Reformed) Church, A California non-profit Corporation has met all of the
Conditions of Approval. This parcel map is in conformance with the approved tentative parcel map.
The approval of a parcel map, which substantially complies with the approved tentative parcel map,
is a mandatory ministerial act under State Law.
The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 30798:
Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of building permit.
rAagd rpfl04/pm30797ma p
FISCAL IMPACT: None
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Fee Checklist
2. Fees & Securities Report
3. Project Vicinity Map
4. Parcel Map No. 30798
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST
CASE NO. PM 30798
rAagd rpt\04/pm30797ma p
The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project.
FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Flood Control (ADP) N/A
Quimby Fees N/A
Development Impact Fee To be paid prior to issuance of a building
permit
CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT
rAagd rpt\04/pm30797map
DAopr-i MAP tin 'An7QR
DATE: December 14. 2004
IMPROVEMENTS
FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE
SECURITY
MATERIAL
SECURITY
& LABOR
Street and Drainage
$
421,500.00
$
211,000.00
Water
$
0.00
$
0.00
Sewer
$
0.00
$
0.00
TOTAL
$
421,500.00
$
211,000.00
Monument
$
6,375.00
DEVELOPMENT FEES
City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs
$
0.00
RCFCD (ADP) Fee
$
N/A
Development Impact Fee
$
0.00
SERVICE FEES
Planning Fee
$
70.00
Comprehensive Transportation Plan
$
4.00
Plan Check Fee
$
1,070.00
Monument Inspection Fee
$
250.00
Fees Paid to Date
$
1,394.00
Balance of Fees Due
$
336.00
4
rlagd rpt\04/pm30797map
■� � ;ana�� <� G
vi
n F €-W 141
Fw R
H.
ga a sb! ���R� � d� a � ��
r �Wn€�nb:sg
a
00
ea.y�y QQ
'' e� kk d "� 5 g a�
ro R z tl€ g Eo L 6_ z
�i �? b 3�� : q b ���� a ��� l !pill " <LLJ
fib
'� � GHb ��3� G 6 MH
d �
ggg @ £ e s v
sXOP
RX
jM6 z 5 r Z
�� s $SSygByqy 41
g g�g4�p y�S
n s a1�,a=yag
�-<�-PEW84 a� �2WIN a a � � ■ g
F u �~6 µ <g� ffi� E
�iYak�Na a
R �p� 3$ a e a s sq yyyy �� sa ns 3 g 5 k
I�
g� lip Q I& n cq mWe _: b a b g as
���� � �� �. aE � rx�5vj wa WN �a� � �ss�1 9
S
PMKW.Y a I Y '
Y
W Rc Op\`OJ
y2j �=III — I O i V O
M LL Zm $
en
KIP
M1fR.TliE IS u7 .E ,
7A P§
�_'��
p egw - 6
va x
a
¢ � g
Z ' b
:
g-ya ss¢ azs
b a- limp
imp
Q
i
g n4 a 1a
b J kM€ N e ���LLJ
ky�
UN eai z •� __ _ -_
ay b N L `� -- - ---- -
z I.1� pw t6 e. b e.- -
w e i w
zj�
12
8€k�5 k' 8 Aga aa� �k i i N Es i @ g2J Ak
y R'.i 1 - EEI �lA gff
ba $ «''gyv�
�lj IS
3g ^BA�g n� S W y R`44 o f
ii7@@ ��ae,RYs=Me g� .R, g�nap =s�¢ ��� 4a\r y" A e¢
�'L iy gz S�.S ERS � 6 3 R 14 _K$A F) /�'�L7q
j1 R p F r•.R ttl$ pro
tltC'
�� V Jci UanO
SJill
7 e'7
Q
« �
�
� \
..
£;
�
Kw-wS4
,wa
ew
, .; , _,,., ,,,
b�
I E849g� x�tSa
1r � EiS�t
y II'
a I I � 1ftrczc �„c.pcBlxA
c'�'e 1 Ar(Lf xWilyJW
trNE '
ea
M �_ tl
N
toy 9
KJ 8+�y�$
3
y
e9<S'Qf EnS
¢
f S
b
O
O q6 4
8
e4
Z. b
yp
CL Ej"€
= e
-
8
Q%�
i R
a
_Y
' j
n
``Rn
nN
_vy rS
p'Elf 1.f .MBIN
r
1HFEV�VM�
,Y�(y,XBll
_
w-
Tot
>a
�gw
WWI
r
d
n�-n�in�¢
-
W4B_5202-0
�R
'99
z;s8
8
0,.
8
,8
.ge
tlm
sas.s.8sa
sg
88
88g
-0-1
MON
I$ryRR
_n
aei
Pi'GG�
-ieiGGuuC
p�
J i3
a
i /
i�
AtlINMJ
g' //
O< I NiD
VOL
f Y zz8�r
z
e'tl�sy�9 l' F_Isn
J
66 8
K'Wf ]1VA01d.
-' Ism
i9
'r II^ �Y
eY�s24 I
/ Apr III
2VmffP r'e6
i
atl Y
I^ of ,
2
Y
le
=i II
a-
I�
N.LY,BL9W x.[V.BLBW /0 '�/ aS
N
d
d
e b�
aN
I
,6L M,fN,M.
�R�SI Y@y3' Iy lu
9 ! 0 £ 1 1 3 H S 33 S
II
N Sa
w ym
W
w Yr
nip < IP "gl
M yy N
w
0)
O Pik a B �Ba n.
n� mono
O a�pip
$R
GryGry < - 3 rnRo - I•r•�
'¢6 u $ipi€5 �
/Ly'
} i C d I± 'ON O1fl311tl �]NYtl 53NM91X.� N
LLJ
G N IV
Z77
w�R I _
Q g W
a
3�Qa3 � � j9.0o9j.9 n$
3 _
Ri—J III oa
I II I ml � Rm
gBRrv$_.e.�
R _ .
a€ gy age
� � x4
S
YEI➢OWS
PIIX(WWY T
ra
4 p h Z3
2 LL SO , U
1
<
xm
xvc u----- - --J
M1E�t51E t5 u7 ed _ WON J i w
en kR i q l i 0°O
a o en
^R3
= n5g`g
�y�
W� + $7� a y <o a
kayo -Lai • w
_ <P
12
IR
d.
max eaa� ' °�
e Y _
rP
• o a w�—°tiP °e I �
O6kk §5 d ' e ____— —6^--- -------- - __—
CL
AN
151Ll i
V-pill 8 e a
o " y psp 9rs
z lit
Q^ � n� —
4 36 �� e ` <p'------' — ----- e 4
- .,Y
v�
It
E
dE $
LE H a s s Nil 1�z
sake"geL kha
E ai@g ^�O! ���GB�
ORM$ ffig 8 w 4
[J• +�......., �omW`niui'iQ w��++{�{aa��[jC£%�£X
Nn 4v{a 6 d�NA
4
PM 30798
ITEM 8
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FI
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
P `p
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services � �
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Grant Deed — Harveston Community Park
PREPARED BY: Cathy McCarthy, Development Services Administrator
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed for
Harveston Community Park, located in the Harveston development and direct staff to proceed
with the necessary actions to cause the deed to be recorded.
BACKGROUND: Harveston is a large Specific Plan development in northern part of
the City east of Interstate 15. As part of this project, the developer is conditioned to construct
and dedicate a 19.5 acre community park to the City of Temecula.
The park includes two dedicated full size lighted soccer fields; 2 lighted ball fields; age
appropriate play areas; community building; restroom/concession/maintenance building; a large
group picnic area; parking with approximately 300 spaces; benches; tables; drinking fountains
and walkways.
All improvements have been completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director
and the maintenance and establishment period is nearing completion. A policy of title insurance
will be provided by the developer to accompany the transfer of title to the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: Cost for maintaining Harveston Community Park for the remaining
portion of this fiscal year has been estimated at $110,000 and is included in the Temecula
Community Service District current budget.
The developer is entitled to receive fee credit against the park and recreation component of the
City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) in accordance with Development Agreement between City
of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc. and Winchester Hills I, LLC dated August 28, 2001.
ATTACHMENTS: 1) Grant Deed
2) Vicinity Map
R'.WcCanhCWgenda Reports\Harveston Community Park- Grant Deed Coc
EXEMPT RECORDING REQUESTED BY
City of Temecula
PER GOVT CODE § 27383
AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO:
Office of the City Clerk
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO:
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula CA 92589-9033
EXEMPT RECORDING
SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE
FOR RECORDER'S USE
GRANT DEED
The undersigned grantor declares:
FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged,
Harveston, LLC, A Delaware Limited Liability Company
hereby grants to the CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation, the following
described real property in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California:
See Exhibit "A" attached hereto,
Executed on
Signature _
Tom
Title:
2004 , at
California.
Exhibit A
LOT 12 OF TRACT NO. 39639-2, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF
RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON THE MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 345 OF MAPS, PAGES 1 THROUGH 19 INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
,
Vicnity Map
Harveston Community Map
N Highways
:\ " Centerline
'1!!iiJ Parks
D Parcels
(I)
300 0
1""""""'-
This map was rnadebylheClIydTemecuIaGeographk:
Information System. The map ill derived from base data
produced by the Rlver$lde COunty As$e$W. 08plIrtment
end the Tnlll'6portalion aod Lend Management Agency
cfRMltsldeCOl.a1ty. TheCllyofTemeculall$SUmelIl1O
-'lIlntyor legal responsibility lor \tie Infonnatlon contained
on lhIs map. Dalaandln1ormatlonrepr8S8llledonthb:map
aresubjectloupdateandmodificatlon.TheGeographlc
Information system aoo other lIOU'C8S ahould be queried for Ihe
mosteurrentWorrnat\on. Thl$maplsnollorreprintOlresale.
300 600 Feet
Mepprepllred0ecembe<6,2004
r:\gi$\keI~\harvestonpart<..pr
ITEM 9
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Police Department OTS Grant Funding
PREPARED BY: Heidi Schrader, Management Analyst
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Increase estimated General Fund Grant Revenue by $29,220.
2. Appropriate $29,220 from General Fund Grant Revenue to the Police Department.
BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula has been active in seeking grant funding to
participate in the Office of Traffic Safety Sobriety Checkpoint Program for Local Law Enforcement
Agencies. The goal of this program is to reduce the number of victims killed and injured in alcohol
involved crashes in participating cities. Participating agencies will conduct sobriety checkpoints
during a thirteen -month period. That time period could encompass three "You Drink & Drive. You
Lose' statewide and national mobilization periods during an 18 day period for December 17, 2004 -
January 3, 2005, an 18 day period for August 19, 2005 — September 5, 2005 and an additional 18
day period for December 16, 2005 — January 2, 2006 as well as checkpoints outside of the
mobilization periods.
Recently the City received $29,220 in grant funding from the Office of Traffic Safety to participate in
this program per grant agreement AM05150. The City will receive a flat rate of $4,870.00 per
checkpoint for conducting a minimum of 6 DUI checkpoints during the program mobilization periods
and for checkpoints conducted outside the mobilization periods. This checkpoint compensation is
based on the following minimum criteria. Each checkpoint will be operational for a minimum of 8
hours and will be staffed on an overtime basis only, by a minimum of 8 sworn personnel, 1, of which
will be supervisory level, and 1 non-swom personnel. This per rate represents the approved rate
from the grant application.
FISCAL IMPACT: General Fund Grant Revenues will be increased by $29,220 and will offset
the appropriation of $29,220 in the Police Department budget for overtime (Account number 001-
170-999-5279).
ITEM 10
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA E
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Council
FROM: Aaron Adams, Senior Management Analyst
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Resolution in Support of Legislation to Improve Infrastructure
PREPARED BY: Ashley Jones, Management Assistant
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-_
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE
INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL
LEVEL.
BACKGROUND: At the request of Councilmember Jeff Stone, City staff has prepared the attached
resolution of support for legislation that would fund improvements to infrastructure at the local, state and
federal level.
The federal government plays a key role in financing and funding infrastructure. Over the last few years,
Congressional interest in infrastructure spending has shifted and federal spending on infrastructure is
declining in real dollars and as a percentage of the federal budget. As evidence, several major
infrastructure bills with grass roots and industry support were never passed into law by the 108th
Congress.
In the next decade, America's infrastructure faces great challenges. The physical condition of the
infrastructure that we rely on everyday could be described as "tolerated neglect". Last year, the American
Society of Civil Engineers updated its 2001 Report Card for America's Infrastructure with a Progress
Report that showed little or no improvement in 12 categories and an overall "D+" grade for everything from
roads and bridges to water and wastewater facilities. The estimated total needed to bring conditions to
acceptable levels exceeded $1.6 trillion.
In January 2005, the 109th Congress will convene with approximately forty-five new faces. As such, the
infrastructure community will be putting a considerable effort into reclaiming the role of infrastructure as a
budget priority and crafting legislation that will pass in the upcoming Congress. If approved, copies of the
attached resolution of support will be sent to the Citys state and federal representatives.
FISCAL IMPACT: There is no known fiscal impact.
Attachment: Resolution 04-
RESOLUTION NO. 04-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE
INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
LEVEL
WHEREAS, there is a $12 billion annual shortfall in funding for infrastructure needs; and
WHEREAS, more than one third of U.S. surface waters do not meet water quality
standards; and
WHEREAS, there is an $11 billion shortfall in funding to repair or replace water facilities
that are nearing the end of their useful life and/or to comply with federal water quality
regulations; and
WHEREAS, traffic congestion costs the economy $67.5 billion annually in lost
productivity and wasted fuel; and
WHEREAS, the average rush hour grew more than 18 minutes from 1997 to 2000; and
WHEREAS, as of 2000, 27.5% of the nation's bridges (162,000) were structurally
deficient or functionally obsolete; and
and
WHEREAS, the number of unsafe damns has risen by 23% to nearly 2,600 nationwide;
WHEREAS, there have been 21 damn failures in the past two years nationwide;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Temecula hereby
supports future legislation to improve infrastructure including highways, bridges, railways, transit
systems, airports, harbors, water, wastewater systems, and other infrastructure at the local,
state and federal level.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at
a regular meeting held on the 14th day of December 2004.
Mike Naggar, Mayor
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk
[SEAL]
CADocuments and SettingsWichaela.Ballmich\Local SettingMemporary Intemet Fi1es\0LK2FA\KesoImion- Improved Infrastructure-Smne.doc
TEMECULA COMMUNITY
SERVICES DISTRICT
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
DECEMBER 7, 2004
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at
7:52 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS:
ABSENT: 0 DIRECTORS:
Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone, and
Washington
None
Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No comments.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 23, 2004.
2 Approval of the Quitclaim Deed to vacate the Landscape Maintenance Easements
Dedicated on Final Tract Map Nos. 26828. 26828-1, and 26828-2: Acceptance of
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the three Quitclaim Deeds to vacate the landscape maintenance
easements dedicated on Final Tract Map Nos. 26828, 26828-1, and 26828-2;
2.2 Accept 28 revised landscape maintenance easements from Richmond American
Homes of California, Inc. for Tract Map Nos. 26828, 26828-1, and 26828-2,
subject to Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) acceptance of
landscape improvements;
2.3 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Quitclaim Deeds and the Landscape
Maintenance Easements.
RAMinutes. csd\l 20704 1
3 Financial Statements for the three months ended September 30, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended September
30, 2004;
3.2 Approve operating transfer in the amount of $70,000 from Citywide Operations to
Service Level D.
4 Acceptance of Landscape Easement Deed from DroDertv owners within Tract Mao No
19872-2 adiacent to Pechanga Parkway
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Accept one Landscape Easement Deed from a property owner within Tract Map
No. 19872-2 adjacent to Pechanga Parkway;
4.2 Authorize the City Clerk to record the Landscape Easement Deed.
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan — Service Level B, Service Level C, and S
Rates and Charges
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. CSD 04-14
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
ACKNOWLEDGING THE FILING OF A REPORT WITH
RESPECT TO SERVICE LEVEL C AND SERVICE LEVEL D
RATES AND CHARGES FOR RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC
PLAN BEGINNING FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 AND SETTING A
TIME AND PLACE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 5. The motion
was seconded by Director Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
DISTRICT BUSINESS
Appointment of President and Vice President of the Community Services District
for Calendar Year 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to appoint the President, effective
January 1, 2005, to preside until the end of Calendar Year 2005;
R: Winutes.csd\1 20704
6.2 Entertain motions from the Board of Directors to appoint the Vice President,
effective January 1, 2005, who will assume the duties of the President in the
President's absence and hold this office until the end of Calendar Year 2005.
MOTION: Director Roberts moved to reappoint President Washington as the President for
calendar year 2005, effective January 1, 2005 and to appoint Director Naggar as Vice President
for calendar year 2005, effective January 1, 2005. The motion was seconded by Director
Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT
Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse commented on the wonderful Annual Tree
Lighting event and invited all to the Annual Holiday Parade on Jefferson Road between Del Rio
and Overland Roads, Friday, December 10, 2004, at 7:00 P.M.
GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT
General Manager Nelson commended the Community Services Department staff for the many
festive events being offered to the community.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS
No additional comments.
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:56 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park
Drive, Temecula, California.
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/District Secretary
[SEAL]
RAMinutes.csd\120704
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors �
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Second Amendment to the Excel Landscape, Inc. Maintenance
Services Contract
PREPARED BY: Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
1. Approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. to provide a 3%
Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of $35,772.00 and to allow for the
addition of new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in the amount of
$169,224.00.
2. Authorize the annual expenditure of $1,397,340.00 for landscape maintenance services for
medians, facilities, sports parks, north slopes, south slopes, new and supplemental
landscape maintenance service areas, and authorize the City Manager to approve a 10%
contingency for extra work items in the amount of $139,734.00.
BACKGROUND: On November 25, 2003 the Board of Directors awarded a thirty six (36)
month contract to Excel Landscape, Inc. to provide landscape maintenance services for medians,
facilities and the south slope areas. On May 11, 2004 the Board of Directors approved the first
amendment to their contract to include the addition of landscape maintenance services for sports
parks, north slope areas and allowed forthe addition of supplemental landscape service areas/sites.
The original contract allows for an annual price adjustment based upon the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) for the Riverside County area on January 1st of each year for the term of the agreement.
Based upon a projected CPI increase for the Riverside County Area of over 3%, Excel Landscape
has requested and staff is recommending an annual price increase of 3% to their Maintenance
Services Contract.
The Second Amendment with Excel Landscape, Inc. provides for the proposed 3% annual price
increase of $35,772.00, the addition of Harveston Community Park and the Phase 1 Median Islands
to their existing Maintenance Services Contract in the amount of $108,816.00. This Second
Amendment also allows for the Director of Community Services to approve the addition of
R:WARRINGK\AGENDA.RPT\Ciry Cowcil\CC LS MINT SERVICES 2003-04 Revised Excel LS Amend 2. doc
supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in an amount not to exceed $60,408.00
Excel Landscape continues to provide consistent quality landscape maintenance services
throughout our city. Due to their proven performance and the increased cost of labor and materials
for other services staff feels that their request for a 3% increase is justified.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the Second Amendment for services to be provided through
December 31, 2005 is $1,397,340.00 plus an additional ten percent (10%) contingency of
$139,734.00. While the agreement period is on a calendar basis, there are sufficient funds in the
TCSD Budget through June 30, 2005 in the following accounts:
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5212
193-180-999-5415
193-180-999-5212
Attachments: 1) Excel Landscape, Inc. Executed Contract
2) Excel Landscape, Inc. First Amendment
3) Excel Landscape, Inc. Second Amendment
R:\HARRINGK\AGENDA.RP'nCity Council\CC LS MAIM SERVICES 2003-04 Revised Excel LS Amend 2.doc
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC.
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of December 14, 2004 by
and between the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and
Excel Landscape Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions
set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On November 25, 2003 the City and Contractor entered into that certain
agreement entitled "City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Agreement for
Maintenance Services ("Agreement') in the amount of $480,350.00 annually.
B. The original Agreement was amended on May 11, 2004 in order to
increase the payment for additional services in the amount of $406,205.00 through December
31, 2004.
B. The parties now desire to increase the payment for the annual Consumer
Price Index adjustment and for additional services in the amount of $1,397,340.00 and amend
the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
Section 3 PAYMENT of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit A for maintenance services described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set
forth in full. The second amendment amount shall not exceed One Million Three
Hundred Ninety Seventy Thousand Three Hundred Forty and 00/100 dollars
($1,397,340.00) through December 31, 2005. The total contract amount is Two
Million Two Hundred Eighty Three Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety Five and 00/100
dollars ($2,283,895.00). All subsequent years of this three (3) year agreement shall
be adjusted upon approval by City staff of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) of
Riverside County on January 1 st of each year for the term of the Agreement unless
additional payment or change order is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed the annual 10%
contingency. Also, the City Manager may approve change orders up to the 10%
contingency amount.
Director of Community Services District on behalf of District may add new
supplemental areas to be maintained by Contractor in accordance with the
specifications and terms of this Agreement. District shall pay Contractor for such
new supplemental areas at the rates set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS%AGREEMNT\EXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
f:3'/l
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
BY:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Excel Landscape Inc.
Jose Alfaro, President
710 Rimpau Ave, Suite 108
Corona CA 92879
(909) 735-9650 (909) 735-0469 (Fax)
I'm
NAME:
TITLE:
M.
NAME:
TITLE:
(Two Signatures Required For Corporations)
R:IHARRINGKWGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\EXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS/SCHOOL SITES SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
MonthlV Price
Annual Price
SP-1
Rancho California Sports Park
$10,204.00
$122,448.00
SP-2
Paloma Del Sol Park
$
4,445.00
$
53,340.00
SP-3
Pala Community Park
$
2,767.00
$
33,204.00
SP-4
Kent Hintergardt Park
$
4,210.00
$
50,520.00
SP-5
Margarita Community Park (TES)
$
3,995.00
$
47,940.00
SP-6
Temeku Hills Park
$
4,455.00
$
53,460.00
SP-7
Harveston Community Park
$
7,800.00
$
93,600.00
SC-1
Temecula Middle School
$
434.00
$
5,208.00
SC-3
James L. Day Middle School
$
518.00
$
6,216.00
SC-6
Vail Ranch Middle School
$
863.00
$
10,356.00
SC-7
Paloma Elementary School
$
863.00
$
10,356.00
SC-8
Pauba Valley Elementary School
$
432.00
$
5,184.00
TOTAL $40,986.00 $491,832.00
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\EXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
M-01
Rancho California Road Medians
$ 632.00
$ 7,584.00
M-02
Ynez Road Medians (includes Solana Way)
684.00
8,208.00
M-03
Butterfield Stage Road Medians
151.00
1,812.00
M-04
Margarita Road Medians (North)
709.00
8,508.00
M-05
Margarita Road Medians (South)
151.00
1,812.00
M-06
Winchester Road at Jefferson Median
151.00
1,812.00
M-07
Pechanga Parkway Medians
151.00
1,812.00
M-08
Meadows Parkway Medians (North)
709.00
8,508.00
*M-09
Paseo Del Sol Medians
709.00
8,508.00
M-10
Harveston Medians (Date St/Margarita Rd)
1268.00
15,216.00
*M-11
Jefferson Avenue Medians
150.00
1800.00
*M-12
Overland Drive Medians/Bridge
250.00
3000.00
*M-13
Red Hawk Medians
500.00
6000.00
FW-1
Interstate 15
3,792.00
45,504.00
TOTAL
$ 10,007.00
$ 120,084.00
(* Supplemental Area)
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK�AGREEMENTS�AGREEMN-REXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
F-1
Community Recreation Center
$ 1,782.00
$ 21,384.00
F-2
Mary Phillips Senior Center
588.00
7,056.00
F-3
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
1,442.00
17,304.00
F-4
Temecula Community Center
376.00
4,512.00
F-5
Fire Station #84
578.00
6,936.00
F-6
Old Town Temecula
1,628.00
19,536.00
F-10
Temecula Children's Museum
309.00
3,708.00
F-20
Fire Station #92
183.00
2,196.00
TOTAL
$6,886.00
$ 82,632.00
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTSWGREEMNT\EXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
S-3
Rancho Highlands
$ 1,494.00
$ 17,928.00
S-8
The Villages A and B
6,670.00
80,040.00
S-12
Vintage Hills
4,369.00
52,428.00
S-13
Presley (Viranda, Country
Glen, Bridlevale)
1,357.00
16,284.00
S-16
Tradewinds
870.00
10,440.00
S-20
Crowne Hill
1,378.00
16,536.00
S-20A
Crowne Hill (Phase 2 & 3)
4,590.00
55,080.00
S-21
Vail Ranch
10,365.00
124,380.00
'S-23
Pheasant Run
268.00
3216.00
'S-26
Gallery Homes Traditions
160.00
1920.00
TOTAL
$ 31,521.00
$ 378,252.00
(' Supplemental Area)
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNITEXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
S-1
Saddlewood/Pavillion Point
$
2,360.00
$
28,320.00
S-2
Winchester Creek I and II
$
1,575.00
$
18,900.00
S-4
The Vineyards
$
342.00
$
3,104.00
S-5
Signet Series
$
3,607.00
$
43,284.00
S-6
Woodcrest Country
$
825.00
$
9,900.00
S-7
Ridgeview
$
977.00
$
11,724.00
S-9
Rancho Solana
$
60.00
$
720.00
S-10
Martinique
$
294.00
$
3,528.00
S-11
Meadowview Estates
$
188.00
$
2,256.00
S-14
Mirada
$
533.00
$
6,396.00
S-15
Barclay Estates
$
556.00
$
6,672.00
5-17
Monte Vista
$
83.00
$
996.00
S-18
Temeku Hills
$
4,659.00
$
55,908.00
S-19
Campos Verdes
$
2,237.00
$
26,844.00
S-22
Sutton Place/Lennar
$
232.00
$
2,784.00
S-24
Harveston (Phase 1)
$
2,524.00
$
30,288.00
'S-24A
Harveston (Phase 2)
$
3,640.00
$
43,680.00
S-25
Serena Hills
$
2,019.00
$
24,228.00
'S-26
Richmond American (26828)
$
334.00
$
4,008.00
TOTAL
$27,045.00
$324,540.00
(' Supplemental Area)
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNIIEXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance Services
New Landscape Maintenance Service Areas
Maintenance Service Area
Sports Park Service Area (includes ballfield prep.)
Neighborhood Park Service Area
Slope Service Area
Median Service Area
Community Facility Service Area
Trail Service Area
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Mon.-Fri.
Includes trash removal).
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Sat.&Sun.
Includes trash removal).
Price per Square Foot
Monthly
Annually
.0119
.1428
sq.
ft.
.01
.12
sq.
ft.
.008
.096
sq.
ft.
.015
.18
sq.
ft.
.015
.18
sq.
ft.
.004
.048
sq.
ft.
967.50
11,610.00
perfld.
*928.80 11,145.60 perfld.
Up to three (3) fields for same amount.
Authorized Signature
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\EXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
EXHIBIT A
Landscape Maintenance Extra Work
Price Sheet
I. Turf Maintenance (All turf areas)
Unit Cost
1.
Mowing (Including bagging of clippings)
$ .002
sq. ft.
2.
Edging
.05
linear ft.
3.
String Trimming
.10
linear ft.
4.
Aerification (Core/3")
.002
sq. ft.
5.
Aerification (Deep Tine/6")
N/A
sq. ft.
6.
Weed Removal (Manual)
20.00
per man hr.
7.
Pest Control (Manual)
35.00
per man hr.
8.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.001
sq. ft.
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
mark-up
General Landscape Maintenance (Planters and Slooe areas
1.
Edging (Ground Cover)
$ .15
linear ft.
2.
Trimming (Shrubs, Ground Cover)
.02
sq. ft.
3.
Pruning/Shrubs, Vines, Roses
.04
sq. ft.
4.
Pruning/Trees (To 18')
40.00
each
5.
Weed Removal (Manual)
20.00
per man hr.
6.
Pest Control (Manual)
35.00
per man hr.
7.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.002
sq. ft.
8.
Vegetation Removal
.02
sq. ft.
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
mark-up
III. Plant Material (Installed, all areas)
1.
Annual Color (4" Container)
$ 1.50
each
2.
Ground Cover
20.00
flat
3.
One (1) Gallon
6.00
each
4.
Five (5) Gallon
18.00
each
5.
Fifteen (15) Gallon
75.00
each
6.
24" Box Tree
200.00
each
7.
Seeded Turf
.15
sq. ft.
8.
Sodded Turf
.85
sq. ft.
9.
Hydroseed
.10
sq. ft.
10.
Soil Preparation (Existing area)
.20
sq. ft.
11.
Soil Preparation (New area)
.15
sq. ft.
12.
Wood Mulch
35.00
cu. yd.
IV. Irrigation
System Maintenance
1.
Inspection
$ 40.00
per hr.
2.
Repair (Main line, Lateral line, Sprinklers)
35.00
per hr.
3.
Parts
20%
mark-up
V. General Pest Control
1. Written Recommendation by PCA $ 200.00 each
2. Qualified Applicator (QAC) 45.00 per hr.
3. Trained Applicator 35.00 per hr.
4. Material 20% mark-up
R:\HARRINGK\ACPEEMENTS\AGREEMNTIEXCEL LS\Excel Revised Second Amendment 04-05.doc
g3-1,$1
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
EXCEL LANDSCAPE INC.
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of May 11, 2004 by and
between the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and Excel
Landscape Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes:
A. On November 25, 2003 the City and Contractor entered into that certain
agreement entitled "City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Agreement for
Maintenance Services ("Agreement") in the amount of $480,350 annually.
B. The parties now desire to increase the payment for additional services in
the amount of $406,205 and amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
2. Section 3 PAYMENT of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows
a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit A for maintenance services described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set
forth in full. The first amendment amount shall not exceed Four Hundred Six
Thousand Two Hundred Five and 00/100 dollars ($406,205) through December 31,
2004 for the additional landscape maintenance service areas for a total annual
contract amount, of Eight Hundred Eighty Six Thousand Five Hundred Fifty Five and
00/100 dollars ($886,555). All subsequent years of this three (3) year agreement
shall be adjusted upon approval by City staff of the consumer Price Index (CPI) of
Riverside County on January 1 st of each year for the term of the Agreement unless
additional payment or change order is approved as provided in this Agreement.
b. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed detailing the
worked performed in a form acceptable to the Director of Finance. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in
the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees it
shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of invoice of any
disputed fees set forth in the invoice.
C. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed the 15%
contingency. Also, the City Manager may approve change orders up to the 15%
contingency amount.
RAHARRINGKIAGREEMNT1Excel First Amendment 03-04.doc
t
3. Director of Community Services District on behalf of District may add new areas
to be maintained by Contractor in accordance with the specifications and terns
of this Agreement. District shall pay Contractor for such new areas at the rates
set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
set forth in full.
4. Director of Community Services may execute an Amendment to this Agreement
to reflect the new areas.
5. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
RMARRINWAGREEMN'RExosi First Amendment 03-04.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
DISTRICT
Washington,
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jghes, CIVIC, City
ApproaedAvlo Form:
BY• �
bat- Peter M. Thorson, City Attor
CONTRACTOR
Excel Landscape Inc.
Jose Alfaro, President
710 Rimpau Ave, Suite 108
Corona CA 92879
(909) 735-9650 (909) 735-0469 (Fax)
BY:
NA E.
TITLE:f
(Two Signatures Required For Corporations)
R:111ARRINGKWGREEMNTExce1 First Amendment 03-04.doc
M
i
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SPORTS PARKS/SCHOOL SITES SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
SP-1
Rancho California Sports Park
$9,907.00
$118,884.00
SP-2
Paloma Del Sol Park
$4,316.00
$
51,792.00
SP-3
Pala Community Park
$2,686.00
$
32,232.00
SP-4
Kent Hintergardt Park
$4,087.00
$
49,044.00
SP-5
Margarita Community Park (TES)
$3,879.00
$
46,548.00
SP-6
Temeku Hills Park
$4,325.00
$
51,900.00
SC-1
Temecula Middle School
$ 421.00
$
5,052.00
SC-3
James L. Day Middle School
$ 503.00
$
6,036.00
SC-6
Vail Ranch Middle School
$ 838.00
$
10,056.00
SC-7
Paloma Elementary School
$ 838.00
$
10,056.00
SC-8
Pauba Valley Elementary School
$ 419.00
$
5,028.00
TOTAL $32,219.00 $386,628.00
Authorized Signature
RftHARRINGMAGREEMMIEwel First Amendment 03-04.doc 4
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
M-01
Rancho California Road Medians
$ 614.00
$ 7,368.00
M-02
Ynez Road Medians
664.00
7,968.00
M-03
Butterfield Stage Road Medians
147.00
1,764.00
M-04
Margarita Road Medians (North)
688.00
8,256.00
M-05
Margarita Road Medians (South)
147.00
1,764.00
M-06
Winchester Road at Jefferson Median
147.00
1,764.00
M-07
Pechanga Parkway Medians
147.00
1,764.00
M-08
Meadows Parkway Medians (North)
688.00
8,256.00
M-09
Paseo Del Sol Medians
688.00
8,256.00
FW-1
Interstate 15
3,682.00
44,184.00
TOTAL
$7,612.00
$ 91,344.00
Authorized Signature
RMARRINGKWGREEMNTExcel First Amendment 03-04.doc 5
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
COMMUNITY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
F-1
Community Recreation Center
$ 1,730.00
$ 20,760.00
F-2
Mary Phillips Senior Center
571.00
6,852.00
F-3
City Hall/Maintenance Facility
1,400,00
16,800.00
F-4
Temecula Community Center
365.00
4,380.00
F-5
Fire Station #84
561.00
6,732.00
F-6
Old Town Temecula
1,581.00
18,972.00
F-10
Temecula Children's Museum
300.00
3,600.00
F-20
Fire Station #92
178.00
2,136.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
$80,232.00
Authorized Signature
R:+A1RRINGIMGREEMNT1Exoe1 First Amendment 03-04.doc 6
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
Annual Price
S-3
Rancho Highlands
$ 1,450.00
$ 17,400.00
S-8
The Villages A and B
6,476.00
77,712.00
S-12
Vintage Hills
4,242.00
50,904.00
S-13
Presley (Viranda, Country
Glen, Bridlevale)
1,317.00
15,804.00
S-16
Tradewinds
845.00
10,140.00
S-20
Crowne Hill
1,338.00
16,056.00
*S-20A
Crowne Hill (Phase 2 & 3)
4,456.00
53,472.00
S-21
Vail Ranch
10,063.00
120,756.00
*S-23
Pheasant Run
260.00
3120.00
TOTAL
$ 30,447.00
$ 365,364.00
(* New Sites effective July 1, 2004)
Authorized Signature
R:\14ARRINGKWGREEMN7\Exce1 First Amendment 03-04.doc
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(NORTH)
site Site Name
S-1 Saddiewood/Pavillion Point
S-2 Winchester Creek I and II
S-4
S-5
S-6
S-7
S-9
S-10
S-11
S-14
S-15
S-17
S-18
S-19
S-22
*S-24
*S-25
The Vineyards
Signet Series
Woodcrest Country
Ridgeview
Rancho Solana
Martinique
Meadowview Estates
Mirada
Barclay Estates
Monte Vista
Temeku Hills
Campos Verdes
Sutton Place/Lennar
Harveston (Phase 1)
Serena Hills
TOTAL
(*New Sites effective July 1, 2004)
Monthly Price
$2,291.00
$1,529.00
$ 332.00
$3,502.00
$ 801.00
$ 949.00
$ 58.00
$ 285.00
$ 183.00
$ 517.00
$ 540.00
$ 81.00
$4,523.00
$2,172.00
$ 225.00
$2,450.00
$1,960.00
22 398.00
Annual Price
$27,492.00
$18,348.00
$ 3,984.00
$42,024.00
$ 9,612.00
$11,388.00
$ 696.00
$ 3,420.00
$ 2,196.00
$ 6,204.00
$ 6,480.00
$ 972.00
$54,226.00
$26,064.00
$ 2,700.00
$29,400.00
$23,520.00
$268,776.00
Authorized Signature
R,U4ARR1NMAGREEMNI\Exw1 First Amendment 03-04.dm
I i 1
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance Services
New Landscape Maintenance Service Areas
Maintenance Service Area
Sports Park Service Area (includes balifield prep.)
Neighborhood Park Service Area
Slope Service Area
Median Service Area
Community Facility Service Area
Trail Service Area
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Mon.-Fri.
Includes trash removal).
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Sat.&Sun.
Includes trash removal).
Price per Square Foot
Monthly
Annually
.0119
.1428
sq. ft.
.01
.12
sq. ft.
.008
.096
sq. ft.
.015
.18
sq. ft.
.015
.18
sq. ft.
.004
.048
sq. ft.
967.50
11,610.00
per fid.
*928.80 11,145.60 per fid.
* Up to three (3) fields for same amount.
Authorized Signature
RAHARRA7GK\AGREEMNT�Excel First Amendment 03-04.dm
EXHIBIT A
Landscape Maintenance Extra Work
Price Sheet
I. Turf Maintenance (All turf areas)
Unit Cost
1.
Mowing (Including bagging of clippings)
$ .002
2.
Edging
.05
3.
String Trimming
.10
4.
Aerification (Core/3")
.002
5.
Aerification (Deep Tine/6")
N/A
6.
Weed Removal (Manual)
20.00
7.
Pest Control (Manual)
35.00
8.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.001
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
1.
Edging (Ground Cover)
$ .15
2.
Trimming (Shrubs, Ground Cover)
.02
3.
Pruning/Shrubs, Vines, Roses
.04
4.
Pruning/Trees (To 18')
40.00
5.
Weed Removal (Manual)
20.00
6.
Pest Control (Manual)
35.00
7.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.002
8.
Vegetation Removal
.02
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
Plant Material (Installed, all areas
1. Annual Color (4" Container)
2. Ground Cover
3. One (1) Gallon
4. Five (5) Gallon
5. Fifteen (15) Gallon
6. 24" Box Tree
7. Seeded Turf
8. Sodded Turf
9. Hydroseed
10. Soil Preparation (Existing area)
11. Soil Preparation (New area)
12. Wood Mulch
IV. Irrigation System Maintenance
1. Inspection
2. Repair (Main line, Lateral line, Sprinklers)
3. Parts
V. General Pest Control
1. Written Recommendation by PCA
2. Qualified Applicator (QAC)
3. Trained Applicator
4. Material
1.50
20.00
6.00
18.00
75.00
200.00
.15
.85
.10
.20
.15
35.00
$ 40.00
35.00
20%
$ 200.00
45.00
35.00
20%
sq. ft.
linear ft.
linear ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft,
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq. ft.
mark-up
linear ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
each
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
mark-up
each
flat
each
each
each
each
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
cu. yd.
per hr.
per hr.
mark-up
each
per hr.
per hr.
mark-up
R94ARPJNGKWGREEMNTZxce1 First Amendment 03-04.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT, made and entered Into as of November 25.
2003. by and between the Temecula Community Services District ("City'), and
Landscaoe Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions eat
forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. IMThis Agreement shall commence on January 'I. 2004 and shall remain
and continue in effect until December 31. 2006 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement. The City reserves the right' to extend this agreement for an
additional twenty four (24) months within sixty (60) days prior to its expiration.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall perform all of the work described in Exhibit
A and as described in the City's Request for Proposal Landscape Maintenance Services, dated
March 11, 2003 ('Work") and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools,
expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of
said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict
accordance with the specifications set forth in the City's Request for Proposal Landscape
Maintenance Services, dated March 11, 2003.
3. PAYMENT. The.City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the
payment rates and schedules and terms as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
Incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Four Hundred Elahly Thousand Three
Hundred Fifty and 00/100 dollars ($ A% 350.00 ) annually. All Subsequent years of this
three (3) year agreement shall be adjusted upon approval by City staff of the Consumer Price
Index (CPI) of Riverside County on January 1st of each year for the term of the Agreement
unless additional payment or change order is approved as provided in this Agreement.
a. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed
detailing the work performed In a form acceptable to the Director of Finance. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous
month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -
disputed fees. if the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to
Contractor within 30 days of receipt of invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the Invoice.
b. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed the 15%
contingency. Also, the City Manager.may approve change orders up to the 15% contingency
amount.
4. PERFORMANCE, Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder In meeting its
obligations under this Agreement.
R:ULIRREJaKWaREEMNrMinor Maintenance 2003 -Excel LandscW.doc
d. CITY APPROVAL Ali labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or Its
authorized representatives.
G. WAIVER OF CLAIMS, On or before making final request for payment under
Paragraph 3., above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation
under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall
constitute a waiver of all claims against the City under or arising out of this Contract except
those previously made In writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
T. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor
Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job
site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shah comply
with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
the Contract.
8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten
(10) days prior written notice.. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends
or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
Invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
c. The Contractor may terminate this agreement with 120 days written notice to
the City. This correspondence must be delivered to the Maintenance Superintendent.
8. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES,• SUBSTANDARD AND NONPERFORMANCE
a. Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent
(1000/6) of the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the
monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed at the
discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in accordance with the terms
of this Contract.
b. Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a 'Performance
Deficiency Notification".
R:WARMGK\AGREEMN71Minor Maineewce 2003 - Excel Landscape.doc
Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has Incurred a seMce
deficiency sufflciently materiel that a payment reduction or contract termination may result If
Contractor does not take satisfactory corrective action.
The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable time period
for service correction (24 hours to 7 days). Upon re -Inspection of the deficiency, the correction
will either be accepted or rejected by the City. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be
waived, regardless of whether City has Incurred loss as a result of said service failure.
Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a
"Performance Deficiency Status Memorandum'. Should correction not be accepted, a separate
additional Performance Deficiency Notification may be delivered to Contractor, thus incurring
another Performance Deficiency Notice and penalty.
c. If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fail for any reason to perform the
work, the City may Institute the payment reduction and/or terminate the Contract for
nonperformance with ten (10) days written notice to Contractor.
d. In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract
or cause to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor
shalt pay for such work.
10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is In default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor
for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement Immediately
by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and
without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is In
default In the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service
upon It of said notice In which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event that the Contractor fails to cure Its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be
entitled at law, In equity or under this Agreement.
. 11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, Its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature
which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or Incur or which may be
Imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions In performing or failing to perform under the
terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration
of the contract Insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
PLVIARWOIMOREEMMWinor Mainftwee 2003 - End LandecW.doe
may arlse from or In connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor,
Its agents, representatives, or employees.
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form 00 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office forth number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation Insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
than: b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
(1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily Injury,
personal Injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this projectflocatlon or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily Injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
a A —Mability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with Insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
d. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall fumish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that Insurer to bind coverage on Its behalf. All endorsements are to
be received and approved by the City before work commences.
e. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires
every employer to be Insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self.
Insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the.essenoe in this Contract.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Contractor Is and shall at all Umes remain
as to the City a wholly Independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive
direction and control. Neither the City nor any of Re officers, employees or agents shall have
control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees or agents,
R:W JUUNGK\AGREB WMifnorM fnftum2003-M=1Lmdm".doc
except as set forth in this Agreement Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of Its officers, employees or agents are In any manner officers,
employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not Incur or have the power to Incur any debt,
obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind City In any manner.
a. No ampk>yee benefits shall be available to Contractor In connection with
the performance of this Agreement Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the
Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
Indemnification to Contractor for Injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep Itself Informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to
comply with this section.
16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of Ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be
encountered In the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the
necessary Independent examinations and Investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial
investigations or reports prepared by the City for purposes of letting this Contract out to
proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor
to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a
basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated
by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen
and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have
been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or
materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or
items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of
the State of California.
18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of
the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, In the
contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore,
the contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any Interest, whether contractual, non -contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than
the City of Temecula, and that if any such Interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any
time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other
party or parties, even if such Interest would not be considered a conflict of Interest under Article
4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4
of Title I of the Goverment Code of the State of California.
19. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City.
20. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges Its responsibilities with respect to
locating utility facilities pursuant to Califomia Goverment Code Section 4215.
P-MARROJOMORENAMWinor Maintenance 2003 -Excel tadeceM.doc
21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the
appropriate regional notification center In accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
22.. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that It has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate In Its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (1) personal
service, (1I) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (III) mailing In the
United States Mail, certified mall, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To City: City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor.
Excel Landscape Inc.
710 Rimpau Ave
Corona, CA 92879
(909) 735-9650 (phone)
(909) 735-0489 (fax)
24. ASSIGNMENT, The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement,
Gent, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
25. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor
shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the
services described in this Agreement.
28. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place In the municipal, superior, or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described In this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged Into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is
entering Into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon
each party's own Independent Investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has
the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind
Contractor to the performance of Its obligations hereunder.
kWARMG MGRMWM\Minor MdoU== 2M - &=I Landow.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year flrst above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
P ter M. Thorson, City Attomey
CONTRACTOR
Excel Landscape Inc.
(Two Signatures Required for Corporations)
&MMMOMOREWNTMinor Wa mmce 2003 • RrA Gndmpe.doc
Exhibit A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
MEDIANS SERVICE AREA
mg
M-01
Rancho California Road Medians
614.00
7,368.00
M-02
Ynez Road Medians
664.00
7,908.00
M-03
Butterfield Stage Road Medians
147.00
1,784.00
M-04
Margarita Road Medians (North)
688.00
8,266.00
M-05
Margarita Road Medians (South)
147.00
1,784.00
M-06
Winchester Road at Jefferson Median
147.00
1,764.00
M-07
Pechangs Parkway Medians
147.00
1,764.00
M-08
Meadows Parkway Medians (North)
688.00
8,256.00
M-09
Paseo Del Sol Medians
688.00
8,256.00
FW-1
Interstate 15
3,682.00
44,184.00
TOTAL
$7,612.00
$91,344.00
Authorized Signature
Exhibit A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
COMMUNRY FACILITIES SERVICE AREA
a"
F-1
Community Recreation Center
1,730.00
20,760.00
F-2
Mary Phillips Senior Center
571,00
6,852.00
F-3
City Hall/Malntenance Facility
1,400.00
16,800.00
F-4
Temecula Community Center
365.00
4,380.00
F-5
Fire Station #84
661.00
6,732.00
F-6
Old Town Temecula
1,581.00
18,972.00
F40
Temecula Children's Museum
300.00
3,600.00
F-20
Fire Station #92
178.00
2,136.00
TOTAL
$6,686.00
$80,232.00
Authorized Signature
i
Exhibit A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
SLOPE SERVICE AREA
(SOUTH)
E=3rs��
S-3
Rancho Highlands
1,450.00
17,400.00
8.8
The Villages A and B
6,476,00
77,712.00
8-12
Vintage Hills
4,242.00
50,904.00
S-13
Presley (Vlranda, Country
Olen, Bridlevele)
1,317.00
15,804.00
S-18
Tradewinds
846.00
10,140.00
S-20
Crowns Hill
1,338.00
16,056.00
S-21
Vail Ranch
10,063.00
120,756.00
TOTAL
$25,731.00
S 308,772.00
Authorized Signature
R:WARRINOKUORBBMNt\Minm Moint m m 2003 - BxW tandsogmdoo
Pricing Shoot for Landscape Maintenance Services
New Landscape Maintenance Service Areas
Maintenance Service Area
Sports Perk Service Area (includes ballfield prep.)
Neighborhood Park Service Area
Slope Service Area
Median Service Area
Community Facility Service Area
Trail Service Area
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Mon.-Fri.
Includes trash removal).
Salifield Preparation (Single field/Sat.&Sun.
Includes trash removal).
Price per Square Foot
.0119
.1428
sq, ft.
.01
.12
sq. ft.
.008
.09E
sq. IL
.015
.18
sq. ft.
.015
.18
sq. ft.
.004
.048
sq. ft.
967.50
11,610.00
per field
•928.00
11,145.60
per field
' Up to three (3) fields for same amount.
Authorized Signature
&WARRINWAGREEMN7Winor Maintenance 2003 - Excel lmdscape,doc
Landscape Maintenance Extra Work
Price Sheet
I. Turf
1.
Maintenance IAN turf areas)
Mowing (Including begging of clippings)
Linn Coat
$ •002
2.
Edging
.06
3.
String Trimming
.10
4.
AerMcation (Core/3")
.002
6.
Aerificatlon (Deep TinaV)
N/A
6.
Weed Removal (Manuel)
20.00
7.
Pest Control (Manuel)
35.00
8.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.001
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
1. Edging (Ground Cover)
$ .15
2. Trimming (Shrubs, Ground Cover)
.02
3. Pruning/Shrubs, Vines, Roses
.04
4. Pruning/Trees (To 18')
40.00
5. Weed Removal (Manual)
20.00
6. Pest Control (Manual)
35.00
7. Fertilization (Placement only)
.002
8. Vegetation Removal
.02
9. Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
Plant Material (Installed. all areas
1. Annual Color (4' Container)
2. Ground Cover
3. One (1) Gallon
4. Five (5) Gallon
5. Fifteen (15) Gallon
6. 24' Box Tree
7. Seeded Turf
8. Sodded Turf
9. Hydroseed
10. Soil Preparation (Existing area)
11. Soil Preparation (New area)
12. Wood Mulch
IV, Irrigation System Maintenance
1. Inspection
2. Repair (Main line, Lateral line, Sprinklers)
3. Parts
V. General Pest Control
1. Written Recommendation by PCA
2. Qualified Applicator (QAC)
3. Trained Applicator
4. Material
$ 1.50
20.00
6.00
18.00
75.00
200.00
.15
.86
.10
.20
.15
35.00
$ 40.00
35.00
20%
$ 200.00
46.00
35.00
20%
sq. ft.
linear ft.
linear ft.
sq, ft.
sq. ft.
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq. ft.
mark-up
linear ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
each
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq, ft.
sq. ft.
mark-up
each
flat
each
each
each
each
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
cu. yd.
per hr.
per hr.
mark-up
each
per hr.
per hr.
mark-up
RWARMGIMGRB RNTMinor Maintenance 2003 • Bxoel Landr.We.doc
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAN
CITY MANAGER
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Board of Directors
FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services �q t
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: First Amendment to the Midori Gardens, Inc. Maintenance Services
Contract
PREPARED BY: Kevin T. Harrington, Maintenance Superintendent
RECOMMENDATION: The Board of Directors:
1. Approve the First Amendment to the contract with Midori Gardens, Inc. to provide a 3%
Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of $10,800.00 and to allow for the
addition of new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in the amount of
$40,800.00.
2. Authorize the annual expenditure of $411,600.00 for landscape maintenance services for
neighborhood parks, new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas, and
approve 10% contingency for extra work items in the amount of $41,160.00.
BACKGROUND: On November 25, 2003 the Board of Directors awarded a thirty six (36)
month contract to Midori Gardens, Inc. to provide landscape maintenance services for neighborhood
parks in the amount of $360,000.00.
The original contract allows for an annual price adjustment based upon the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) for the Riverside County area on January 1st of each year for the term of the agreement.
Based upon a projected CPI increase for the Riverside County Area of over 3%, Midori Gardens,
Inc. has requested and staff is recommending an annual price increase of 3% to their Maintenance
Services Contract.
The First Amendment with Midori Gardens, Inc. provides for the proposed 3% annual price increase
of $10,800.00. This Second Amendment also allows for the Director of Community Services to
approve the addition of supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in an amount not to
exceed $40,800.00.
Midori Gardens, Inc. continues to provide consistent quality landscape maintenance services
throughout our neighborhood parks. Due to their proven performance and the increased cost of
RdHARRINGKAGENDA.RPTCity ComciRCC LS MArNT SERVICES Midori LS 2003-04 Amend I.doc
labor and materials for other services staff feels that their request for a 3% increase is justified
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the First Amendment for services to be provided through
December 31, 2005 is $411,600.00 plus an additional ten percent (10%) contingencyof $41,160.00.
While the agreement period is on a calendar basis, there are sufficient funds in the TCSD Budget
through June 30, 2005 in the following accounts:
190-180-999-5415
190-180-999-5212
Attachments: 1 Midori Gardens, Inc. Executed Contract
2) Midori Gardens, Inc. First Amendment
R:V1ARRINGK\AGENDA.RPT'City CowciKC LS MAINT SERVICES Midori LS 2003-04 A�nd J.dm
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND
MIDORI GARDENS, INC.
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of December 14, 2004 by and
between the Temecula Community Services District, a municipal corporation ("City") and Midori
Gardens, Inc. ("Contractor'). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes
A. On November 25, 2003 the City and Contractor entered into that certain
agreement entitled "City of Temecula Temecula Community Services District Agreement for
Maintenance Services ("Agreement") in the amount of $360,000 annually.
B. The parties now desire to increase the payment for the annual Consumer
Price Index adjustment and for additional services in the amount of $411,600 and amend the
Agreement as set forth in this Amendment.
2. Section 3 PAYMENT of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows:
a. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the payment rates
and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit A for maintenance services described in
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set
forth in full. The first amendment amount shall not exceed Four Hundred Eleven
Thousand Six Hundred and 00/100 dollars ($411,600) through December 31, 2005.
The total contract amount is Seven Hundred Seventy One Thousand Six Hundred
and 00/100 dollars ($771,600). All subsequent years of this three (3) year
agreement shall be adjusted upon approval by City staff of the Consumer Price Index
(CPI) of Riverside County on January 1st of each year for the term of the Agreement
unless additional payment or change order is approved as provided in this
Agreement.
b. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed detailing the
worked performed in a form acceptable to the Director of Finance. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in
the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each
invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Contractor's fees it
shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of invoice of any
disputed fees set forth in the invoice.
C. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed the 10%
contingency. Also, the City Manager may approve change orders up to the 10%
contingency amount.
R:\HARRINGK�AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\MIDORI GARDENS LS\Midod Gardens Amendment 04-05.doc
3. Director of Community Services District on behalf of District may add new areas
to be maintained by Contractor in accordance with the specifications and terms
of this Agreement. District shall pay Contractor for such new areas at the rates
set forth in Exhibit A, which is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though
set forth in full.
4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions
of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\MIDORI GARDENS LS\Midod Gardens Amendment 04-05.doc 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day
and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
BY:
Chuck Washington, President
ATTEST:
1-ya
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
BY:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
Midod Gardens, Inc.
3231 & Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92590
(714)751-8792 (phone) (714)751-4167 (fax)
M
NAME:
TITLE:
M
NAME:
TITLE:
(Two Signatures Required For Corporations)
R:\HARRINGK\AGREEMENTS�AGREEMN1)MIDORI GARDENS LS\Midori Gardens Amendment 04-05.doc 3
EXHIBIT A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS SERVICE AREA
Site #
Site Name
Monthly Price
AnnualPrice
P-1
Veterans Park
$ 1,508.84
$ 18,106.08
P-2
Sam Hicks Monument Park
1,626.29
19,515.48
P-3
Calle Aragon Park
134.17
1,610.04
P-4
Bahia Vista Park
134.17
1,610.04
P-5
Loma Linda Park
1,219.72
14,636.64
P-6
Riverton Park
2,032.86
24,394.32
P-7
John Magee Park
406.57
4,878.84
P-9
Voorburg Park
101.64
1,219.68
P-10
Nicolas Road Park
1,219.72
14,636.64
P-1 1
Butterfield Stage Park
1,219.72
14,636.64
P-12
Temecula Duck Pond
2,846.00
34,152.00
P-13
Rotary Park
243.94
2,927.28
P-14
Nakayama Park
101.64
1,219.68
P-15
Winchester Creek Park
1,626.29
19,515.48
P-16
Long Canyon Creek Park
1,271.22
15,254.64
P-17
Vail Ranch Park
6,260.94
75,131.28
P-18
Stephen Michael Linen Jr. Memorial Park
813.14
9,757.68
P-19
Pablo Apis Park
813.14
9,757.68
P-20
Crowne Hill Park
1,463.64
17,563.68
P-21
Meadows Park
2,032.86
24,394.32
P-22
Crowne Hill Park A
2,032.86
24,394.32
P-23
Serena Hills Park
1,321.35
15,856.20
*P-24
Harveston Lake Park
3,400.00
40,800.00
SS-1
Via Eduardo Streetscape
129.38
1,552.56
FC-1
Nada Lane
103.00
1,236.00
T-1
Santa Gertrudis Trail
236.90
2,842.80
TOTAL
$34,300.00
$ 411,600.00
(* Supplemental Area)
Authorized Signature
R:\HARR1 NGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNnM] DORI GARDENS LSUdori Gardens Amendment 04-05.doe 4
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance Services
New Landscape Maintenance Service Areas
Maintenance Service Area
Sports Park Service Area (includes ballfield prep.)
Neighborhood Park Service Area
Slope Service Area
Median Service Area
Community Facility Service Area
Trail Service Area
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Mon.-Fri.
Includes trash removal).
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Sat.&Sun.
Includes trash removal).
Price per Square Foot
Monthly
Annual]
NO BID
sq.
ft.
.010
.12 sq.
ft.
.015
.18 sq.
ft.
NO BID
sq.
ft.
NO BID
sq.
ft.
.007
.084 sq.
ft.
NO BID
per field
NO BID per field
Authorized Signature
R:\HAPRrNGK\AGPEEMENTS\AGREEMN'RMIDORI GARDENS LS\Midori Gardens Amendment 04-05.doc
Landscape Maintenance Extra Work
Price Sheet
1. Turf Maintenance (All turf areas)
Unit Cost
1 .
Mowing (including bagging of clippings)
$ .022
2.
Edging
.005
3.
String Trimming
.005
4.
Aerification (Core/3")
.005
5.
Aerification (Deep Tine/6")
.007
6.
Weed Removal (Manual)
19.00
7.
Pest Control (Manual)
30.00
8.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.0006
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
General LandscaDe Maintenance (Planters and SIODe areas
1.
Edging (Ground Cover)
$ .005
2.
Trimming (Shrubs, Ground Cover)
.015
3.
Pruning/Shrubs, Vines, Roses
.03
4.
Pruning/Trees (To 18')
50.00
5.
Weed Removal (Manual)
19.00
6.
Pest Control (Manual)
30.00
7.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.0006
8.
Vegetation Removal
.03
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
Plant Material (Installed. all areas
1. Annual Color (4" Container)
2. Ground Cover
3. One (1) Gallon
4. Five (5) Gallon
5. Fifteen (15) Gallon
6. 24" Box Tree
7. Seeded Turf
8. Sodded Turf
9. Hydroseed
10. Soil Preparation (Existing area)
11. Soil Preparation (New area)
12. Wood Mulch
$ 1.56
16.00
6.00
16.00
65.00
250.00
sq. ft.
linear ft.
linear ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq. ft.
mark-up
linear ft.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
each
per man hr.
per man hr.
sq. ft.
sq. ft.
mark-up
each
flat
each
each
each
each
.30
sq.
ft.
1.00
sq.
ft.
.60
sq.
ft.
.30
sq.
ft.
.40
sq.
ft.
50.00
cu.
yd. (applied)
IV. Irrigation System Maintenance
1. Inspection $ 25.00 per hr.
2. Repair (Main line, Lateral line, Sprinklers) 25.00 per hr.
3. Parts 20% mark-up
V. General Pest Control
1. Written Recommendation by PCA $ 60.00 each
2. Qualified Applicator (QAC)
3. Trained Applicator
4. Material
35.00
per hr.
25.00
per hr.
20%
mark-up
R:\HARR[NGK\AGREEMENTS\AGREEMNT\MIDORI GARDENS LS\Midori Gardens Ameridrnent 04-05.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
FOR
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
THIS MAINTENANCE CONTRACT, made and entered Into as of November 25,
�2003 by and between the Temecula Community Services District (*City"), and Midorl Gardens,
Inc. ("Contractorn). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth
herein, the parties agree as followg:
1. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on January 1. 2004 and shall remain
and continue in effect until December 31, 2006 unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement. The City reserves the right to extend this agreement for an
additional twenty four (24) months within sixty (60) days prior to its expiration.
2. SCOPE OF WORK * Contractor shall perform all of the work described in Exhibit
A and as described in the City's Request for Proposal Landscape Maintenance Services, dated
March 11, 2003 ("Work") and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools,
expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of
said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict
accordance with the specifications set forth in the City's Request for Proposal Landscape
Maintenance Services, dated March 11, 2003.
3. PAYMENT. The City agrees to pay Contractor monthly, in accordance with the
payment rates and schedules and terms as set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent
on the above tasks. This amount shall not exceed Three Hundred Sixty Thousand and
00/100 oilers ($--2§Q&0--0.00
—J annually. All Subsequent years of this three (3) year
agreement shall be adjusted upon approval by City staff of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) of
Riverside County on January 1st of each year for the term of the Agreement unless additional
payment or change order is approved as provided in this Agreement.
a. Contractor shall submit invoices monthly for actual services performed
detailing the work performed in a form acceptable to the Director of Finance. Invoices shall be
submitted on or about the first business day of each month, for services provided in the previous
month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each Invoice as to all non -
disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to
Contractor within 30 days of receipt of Invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
b. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to exceed the 16%
contingency. Also, the City Manager may approve change orders up to the 15% contingency
amount.
4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the
best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor
shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons
engaged In providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting Its
obligations under this Agreement.
P-4L4RMGK\AGREEMN7NMinor Maintene= 2003 - Midori Gardms.dw
5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its
authorized representatives.
6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS On or before making final request for payment under
Paragraph 3., above, Contractor shall submit to City, in writing, all claims for compensation
under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall
constitute a waiver of all claims against the City under or arising out of this Contract except
those previously made In writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release and Indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
7. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor
Code of the State of California, the City has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work In this locality for each craft,
classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the
Department of Industrial Relations. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job
site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply
with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor
Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City,
as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer,
worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done
under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of
the Contract.
8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend
or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten
(10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall Immediately
cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends
or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or
invalidate the remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the
City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination,
provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement
pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
c. The Contractor may ten-ninate this agreement with 120 days written notice to
the City. This correspondence must be delivered to the Maintenance Superintendent.
9. LIQUIDATED DAMAGES: SUBSTANDARD AND NONPERFORMANCE
a. Contractor may be assessed penalties by City up to one hundred percent
(100%) of the monthly value of a site for nonperformance and up to sixty percent (60%) of the
monthly value of a site for substandard performance. Such penalties shall be assessed at the
discretion of the City. Contractor shall be notified of any penalties in accordance with the terms
of this Contract.
b. Contractor shall be notified of service failure by delivery of a "Performance
Deficiency Notification".
1LMARYJKGK\AGMEMNrMinw Maintemce 2003 - Midoii Garcims.doc
Said notice will serve as formal notification that Contractor has Incurred a service
deficiency sufficiently material that a payment reduction or contract termination may result if
Contractor does not take satisfactory corrective action.
The Performance Deficiency Notification will contain the acceptable Ume period
for service correction (24 hours to 7 days). Upon re -Inspection of the deficiency, the correction
will either be accepted or rejected by the City. If accepted, part or all of the penalties may be
waived, regardless of whether City has Incurred loss as a result of said service failure.
Contractor will be notified of correction acceptance status by delivery of a
"Performance Deficiency Status Memorandumn. Should correction not be accepted, a separate
additional Performance Deficiency Notification may be delivered to Contractor, thus Incurring
another Performance Deficiency Notice and penalty.
c. If Contractor should neglect or refuse or fall for any reason to perform the
work, the City may Institute the payment reduction and/or terminate the Contract for
nonperformance with ten (10) days written notice to Contractor.
d. In case of termination by the City for nonperformance, the City may contract
or cause to be done any work not completed at the time of the termination, and the Contractor
shall pay for such work.
10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement
shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor Is In default for cause under the terms of
this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor
for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately
by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the
performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and
without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in
default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the
Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service
upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In
the event that the Contractor falls to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall
have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this
Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which It may be
entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and
hold harmless the City, Its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any
and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature
which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be
imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of
Contractors negligent or wrongful acts or omissions In performing or failing to perform under the
terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration
of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which
&-UiARPNGK\AGREEMNMinorMaintmmce 2003 -Midori GardensAm
may arise from or In connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor,
Its agents, representatives, or employees.
than:
a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87)
covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Workers Compensation Insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
(1) General Liability: $2,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal Injury and property damage. If Commercial General
Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is
used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to
this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice
the required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employer's Liability. $1,000,000 per accident for bodily Injury or
disease.
C. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance Is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
d. V—erification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed
by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on Its behalf. Ail endorsements are to
be received and approved by the City before work commences.
a. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires
every employer to be Insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake. 6eff-
insurance In accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions
before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE: rime Is of the essence in this Contract
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain
as to the. City a wholly Independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times -be under Contractoes exclusive
direction and control. Neither the City nor any of Its officers, employees or agents shall have
control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractoes officers,. employees or agents,
MURMOMORBRANTWinor Maintw=ce 2003 - Midori Cwdem.dm
except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner
represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are In any manner officers,
employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not Incur or have the power to incur any debt,
obligation or liability whatever against the City, or bind City In any manner.
a. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor In connection with
the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided In the
Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for
performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or
Indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILMES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State
and Federal laws and regulations which In any manner affect those employed by it or in any way
affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all
times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and Its officers and
employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to
comply with this section.
16. CONTRACTOR1 INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be
encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the
necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial
investigations or reports prepared by the City for purposes of letting this Contract out to
proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor
to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a
basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
17. CONTRACTORS AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated
by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen
and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have
been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or
materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth In an affidavit covering disputed claims or
items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of
the State of California.
.18. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of
the City of Temect r of a local public body shall have any Interest, direct or indirect, in the
contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore,
the contractor covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or
employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -contractual,
financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than
the City of Temecula, and that if any such Interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any
time, a full and complete disclosure of all such Information will be made, in writing, to the other
party or parties, even If such Interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article
4 (commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4
of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
19. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractors books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged In the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City.
20. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to
locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215.
P_-UiARR1NGK\A0REEMN1%Minor Maintenance 2003 - MidoTi Gardens.doc
21. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the
appropriate regional notification center In accordance with Government Code Section 4215.
22. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will
not, discriminate In Its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin,
color, sex, age, or handicap.
23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the
other party under this Agreement must be In wrriting and may be given either by (1) personal
service, (11) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to,
Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (111) mailing In the
United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the
address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate
by Notice:
To City: City of Temecula
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor:
Midori Gardens, Inc.
3231 S. Main Street
Santa Ana, CA 92707
(714) 751-8792 (phone)
(714) 7514167 (fax)
24. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this
Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of
the City.
25. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor
shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the
services described in this Agreement.
26. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the
laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the
parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation
concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court
with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula.
27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding
between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All
prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or
written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is
entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon
each party's own independent Investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
28. - AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons
executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has
the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind
Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder.
P-4LkRJMGK\A0FYEMNMinor Maintemee 2003 - Midod Gudew.doc
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be
executed the day and year first above written.
TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT
7,
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
By:
RIM-F FEWER
ligore-Twolm "WWW"M 1
(Two Signatures Required for Corporations)
PuVLk"JNGK\AGREEMM%Mhiar Maintenance 2003 - Midorl Ganlens.doc
Exhibit A
Pricing Sheet for Landscape Maintenance
NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
SERVICE AREA
Site Nam
Monthly Price
AnnualPrice
P-1
Veterans Park
$ 1,464.89
$ 17,578.68
P-2
Sam Hicks Monument Park
1,578.92
18,947.04
P-3
Calle Aragon Park
130.26
1,563.12
P-4
Bahia Vista Park
130.26
1,563.12
P-5
Loma Linda Park
1,184.19
14,210.28
P-6
Riverton Park
1,973.65
23,683.80
P-7
John Magee Park
394.73
4,736.76
P-9
Voorburg Park
98.68
1,184.16
P-10
Nicolas Road Park
1,184.19
14,210.28
P-11
Butterfield Stage Park
1,184.19
14,210.28
P-12
Temecula Duck Pond
2,763.11
33,157.32
P-13
Rotary Park
236.83
2,841.96
P-14
Nakayama Park
98.68
1,184.16
P-15
Winchester Creek Park
1,578.92
18,947.04
P-16
Long Canyon Creek Park
1,234.19
14,810.28
P-17
Vail Ranch Park
6.078.58
72.942.96
P-18
Stephen Michael Linen Jr. Memorial Park
789.46
9,473.52
P-19
Pablo Apis Park
789.46
9,473.52
P-20
Crowns Hill Park
1,421.02
17,052.24
P-21
Meadows Park
1,973.65
23,683.80
P-22
Crowns Hill Park A
1,973.65
23,683.80
P-23
Serena Hills Park
1,282.87
15,394.44
SS-1
Via Eduardo Streetscape
125.62
1,507.44
FC-1
Nada Lane
100.00
1,200.00
T-1
Santa Gertrudis Trail
230.00
2,760.00
TOTAL
$30,000.00
$ 360,000.00
Authorized Signature
k-\HARMGK\AGREEMNrMinor Maintenance 2003 - MidoTi Gardens.doc
Pricing Shoot for Landscape Maintenance Services
Now Landscape Maintenance Service Areas
Price per Square Foot
Maintenance Service Area
Monthly
Annuall
Sports Park Service Area (includes ballfield prep.)
NO BID
sq. ft.
Neighborhood Park Service Area
.010
.12
sq. ft.
Slope Service Area
.015
.18
sq. ft.
Median Service Area
NO BID
sq. ft.
Community Facility Service Area
NO BID
sq. ft.
Trail Service Area
.007
.084
sq. ft.
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Mon.-Fri.
NO BID
per field
Includes trash removal).
Ballfield Preparation (Single field/Sat.&Sun.
NO BID
per field
Includes trash removal)
Authorized Signature
R.*\HARRINGK\AGREEMNT\Minor Maintenance 2003 - Midori Gardens.doc
Landscape Maintenance Extra Work
Price Shoot
Turf Maintenance (All turf areas
Unit Coo
1.
Mowing (Including begging of clippings)
$ .022
sq. ft.
2.
Edging
.005
linear ft.
3.
String Trimming
.005
linear ft.
4.
Aerification (Core/3")
.005
sq. ft.
5.
Aerification (Deep Tine/6")
.007
sq. ft.
6.
Weed Removal (Manual)
19.00
per man hr.
7.
Pest Control (Manual)
30.00
per man hr.
B.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.0006
sq. ft.
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
mark-up
II. General Landscape Maintenance (Planters and Slope areajs
I .
Edging (Ground Cover)
$ .005
linear ft.
2.
Trimming (Shrubs, Ground Cover)
.015
sq. ft.
3.
Pruning/Shrubs, Vines, Roses
.03
sq. ft.
4.
Pruning/Trees (To 18')
50.00
each
5.
Weed Removal (Manual)
19.00
per man hr.
6.
Pest Control (Manual)
30.00
per man hr.
7.
Fertilization (Placement only)
.0006
sq. ft.
8.
Vegetation Removal
.03
sq. ft.
9.
Materials (Fertilizer, Soil Amends)
20%
mark-up
Ill. Plant Material (installed, all areas)
1 .
Annual Color (4" Container)
$ 1.56
each
2.
Ground Cover
16.00
flat
3.
One (1) Gallon
6.00
each
4.
Five (5) Gallon
16.00
each
5.
Fifteen (15) Gallon
65.00
each
6.
24" Box Tree
250.00
each
7.
Seeded Turf
.30
sq. ft.
8.
Sodded Turf
1.00
sq.ft.
9.
Hydroseed
.60
sq.ft.
10.
Soil Preparation (Existing area)
.30
sq.ft.
11.
Soil Preparation (New area)
.40
sq.ft.
12.
Wood Mulch
50.00
cu.yd.(applied)
IV. Irrioation System Maintenance
1.
Inspection
$ 25.00
per hr.
2.
Repair (Main line, Lateral line, Sprinklers)
25.00
per hr,
3.
Parts
20%
mark-up
V. General Post Co
1.
Written Recommendation by PCA
$ 60.00
each
2.
Qualified Applicator (QAC)
35.00
per hr.
3.
Trained Applicator
25.00
per hr.
4.
Material
20%
mark-up
R'.UkRR1NrjK\AGREEMNT1Minor Maintenance 2003 - Midori Gardens,doe
TCSD
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY
ITEM 1
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
DECEMBER 7, 2004
A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:56
P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS
ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS
Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and
Comerchero
None
Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
No input.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the minutes of November 23, 2004.
Financial Statements for the three months ended September 30, 2004
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended September
30,2004.
Purchase and Sale Agreement for property in Old Town
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION RDA NO. 04-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THAT CERTAIN
AGREEMENT ENTITLED PURCHASE AND SALE
AGREEMENT AND ESCROW INSTRUCTIONS FOR CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
FIRST STREET, WEST OF OLD TOWN FRONT STREET (APN
922-073-019 AND -021) IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA
RWinutes.rdaN120704
3.2 Authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed $170,000 for acquisition,
escrow, closing costs, appraisal, soils testing, and related fees.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3. The
motion was seconded by Agency Member Naggar and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
PUBLIC HEARING
4 Five -Year Implementation Plan
RECOMMENDATION:
4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. RDA 04-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A FIVE-YEAR
IMPLEMENTATION PLAN FOR THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN NO. 1-1988
Director of Housing and Redevelopment Meyer reviewed the staff report (as per agenda
material), noting that this Implementation Plan will cover the period of January 2005 through
December 2009. In response to Agency Member Washington, Mr. Meyer noted that the Board
has exceeded the expectations of the previous plan.
There being on public input, the public hearing was closed.
MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to adopt Resolution No. RDA 04-11. The motion
was seconded by Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
JOINT CITY COUNCIUREDEVELOPMENT AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING
5 Second Amendment to the Disposition and Development Agreement for the Temecula
Education Center
RECOMMENDATION:
5.1 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled:
RESOLUTION NO. 04-125
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND AGK GROUP, LLC, FOR THE TEMECULA
EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX
R:\Mjn utes. rda\1 20704 2
5.2 That the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula adopt a resolution
entitled:
RESOLUTION RDA NO. 04-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A SECOND AMENDMENT
TO THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA AND AGK GROUP, LLC, FOR THE TEMECULA
EDUCATIONAL COMPLEX
Director of Housing and Redevelopment Meyer presented the staff report (of record),
addressing the identification of cultural resources and poor soil conditions; noting that the soil
condition will require additional soil remediation and alternative foundation designs; that the net
increase to the project will be approximately $3 million due mainly to the increase in remediation
and the recent increases in material cost; and that approval of the recommendation will extend
the schedule of performance by six months.
In response to Agency Member Stone, Mr. Meyer noted that he would not foresee any other
significant delays with regard to this project. Speaking in support of this project, Mr. Stone
expressed his desire for this project to proceed as quickly as possible.
Concurring with Mr. Stone's comment about quickly proceeding with this project, Agency
Member Washington requested that more information be provided as to cultural artifacts found
and the associated delays to which Mr. Meyer responded.
Agency Member Roberts requested that staff provide reports with regard to this project on a
twice -a -month basis to the Agency.
Because of the soils challenges that may extend the grading component and in order to permit
to developer to proceed as soon as possible, Executive Director Nelson advised that staff is as
well exploring the possibility of entering into a license agreement with the developer.
There being no public input, the public hearing was closed.
Commenting on the importance of this project and his desire to proceed with it as quickly as
possible, Mayor Naggar concurred with Mr. Stone's comments as well as with Mr. Roberts'
request to receive an update every two weeks.
Agency Member Washington suggested the establishment of a subcommittee to address this
matter.
Mayor Naggar requested that a project update be provided at the January 25, 2005, City
Council meeting at which time the formation of a subcommittee could be discussed.
MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The
motion was seconded by Councilman Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous
approval.
RAM1nutes.rda%1 20704
AGENCY BUSINESS
6 ADDOintment of ChairDerson and Vice Chairoerson of the RedeveloDment Aaencv for
Calendar Year 2005
RECOMMENDATION:
6.1 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to appoint the Chairperson to
preside, effective January 1, 2005, until the end of Calendar Year 2005;
6.2 Entertain motions from the Agency Members to appoint the Vice Chairperson,
effective January 1, 2005, who will assume the duties of the Chairperson in the
Chairperson's absence and hold this office until the end of Calendar Year 2005.
MOTION: Agency Member Naggar moved to appoint Agency Member Roberts as the
Chairman for calendar year 2005, effective January 1, 2005. The motion was seconded by
Agency Member Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to appoint Agency Member Naggar as the Vice
Chairman for calendar year 2005, effective January 1, 2005. The motion was seconded by
Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Executive Director Nelson relayed staffs excitement with the Temecula Educational Complex.
AGENCY MEMBERS'REPORTS
Because of the complexity of this project, Agency Member Stone strongly supported Agency
Member Roberts' suggestion for staff to provide biweekly reports to the Agency with regard to
the Educational Complex project.
ADJOURNMENT
At 8:12 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to
Tuesday, December 14, 2004 in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive,
Temecula, California.
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC
City Clerk/Agency Secretary
[SEAL]
R: Winutes. rda\1 20704
ITEM 2
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIR.OF FINANCE
CITY MANAGER
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: Shawn E. Nelson, Executive Director
FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004
PREPARED BY: Jason Simpson, Assistant Finance Director
RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency Board receive and file the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year Ended June 30,
2004.
BACKGROUND: Per Section 33080.1 of the Health & Safety Code, the agency is required
to submit an annual report to the board within six (6) months of the end of the agency's fiscal year.
Also included are the Annual State Controller's Report and the Annual RDA Housing Report (HCD
Report.)
As a result of a new accounting rule, Governmental and Accounting Standards Board's (GASB)
Statement Number 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis
(MD&A) for State and Local Governments, the City is required to change the presentation of its
annual financial statements and analysis effective with the fiscal year ending June 30, 2004. Some
major changes include the reporting of infrastructure assets, showing activities on a program level,
and the inclusion of the MD&A.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
ATTACHMENTS: Component Unit Financial Statement
State Controller's Report
Annual Housing Report
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COMEPONENT UNIT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
WITH REPORT ON AUDIT
BYINDEPENDENT
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
JUNE 30, 2004
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
June 30, 2004
Page
Number
Independent Auditors' Report 1-2
Management's Discussion and Analysis 3-7
Basic Financial Statements:
Statement of Net Assets 8
Statement of Activities 9
Balance Sheet - Governmental Funds 10
Reconciliation of Governmental Funds Balance Sheet
to the Statement of Net Assets I I
Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in
Fund Balances - Governmental Funds 12
Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and
Changes in -Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the
Statement of Activities 13
Notes to Basic Financial Statements 14-26
Required Supplementary Information:
Budgetary Comparison Schedule - RDA Low and Moderate
Income Housing Special Revenue Fund 27
Other Supplementary Information:
Computation of Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund - Excess/Surplus 28
Independent Auditors' Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial
Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditiniz Standards 29-30
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS & CONSULTANTS
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATIONS
2121 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92606-4906
(949) 399-0600 - FAX (949) 399-0610
wwwAieblevans.corn
September 13, 2004
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT
Agency Members
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Temecula, California
NRCHAEL R. LUDIN, CPA
CRAIG WSPRAKER, CPA
NITIN P. PATEL, CPA
ROBERT L CALLANAN, CPA
-PHII� H. HOLTKAK9, CPA
'THOMAS M. PERLOWSICL CPA
HARVEY 1. SCHROEDER, CPA
KENNETH R. ANIES, CPA
We have audited the accompanying basic financial statements of the governmental activities and each
major fund of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (a component unit of the City of Temecula), as of
and for the year ended June 30, 2004, which collectively comprise the Agency's basic financial
statements, as listed in the table of contents. These basic financial statements are the responsibility of
the Agency's management. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these basic financial statements
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States
of America and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditime
Standards issued by the Controller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the basic financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall basic
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinions.
In our opinion, the basic financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the respective financial position of the governmental activities and each major fund of the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency as of June 30, 2004, and the respective changes in financial position thereof
for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.
- 1 -
OTHER OFFICES AT: 2965 ROOSEVELT STREET 613 W. VALLEY PARKWAY, SUITE 330
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-2389 ESCONDIDO, CALTFORNIA 92025-2598
(760) 729-2343 - FAX (760) 729-2234 (760) 741-3141 . FAS (760) 741-9890
q
In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated
September 13, 2004 on our consideration of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's internal control
over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations,
contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope
of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing,
and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That
report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and
should be considered in assessing the results of our audit.
The information identified in the accompanying table of contents as management's discussion and
analysis and required supplementary information are not a required part of the basic financial
statements, but are supplementary information required by accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America. We have applied certain limited procedures, which consisted principally
of inquiries of management regarding the methods of measurement and presentation of this
supplementary information. However, we did not audit the information and express no opinion on it.
t I Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that
collectively comprise the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's basic financial statements. The
computation of the excess surplus of the Low and Moderate Income Housing Special Revenue Fund is
presented for additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financial statements. The
information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial
statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial
statements taken as a whole.
z . 6tw�, LLP
') "t"L I
-2-
Redevelopment Agency
Nlanagement's Discussion and Analysis
Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004
As management of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Redevelopment agency, we offer readers of the
Agency's basic financial statements this narrative overview and analysis of the financial activities of the Agency
for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2004. We encourage readers to consider the information presented here in
conjunction with additional information that has been furnished in the accompanying basic financial statements.
i I Financial Highlights
The Agency's governmental activities resulted in net assets (deficit) of $31,098. An increase in nets of
$112,422 from the prior year.
The liabilities of the Agency exceeded its assets at the close of the current fiscal year by $31,098.
Tax increment Revenues increased from $10,949,523 to 11,896,579.
Overview of the FInancial Statements
The discussion and analysis are intended to serve as an introduction to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
basic financial statements. The agency's basic financial statements comprise three components:
1) government -wide financial statements, 2) fund financial statements, and 3) notes to the financial statements.
This report also contains other supplementary information in addition to the basic financial statements
themselves.
Government -wide financial statements
The government -wide financial statements are designed to provide readers with a broad overview of the
agency's finances, in a manner similar to a private -sector business.
The statement of net assets presents information on all the Temecula Redevelopment Agency assets and
liabilities, with the difference between the two reported as net assets. Over tim, increases or decreases in net
assets may serve as a useful indicator of whether the financial position of the agency is improving or
deteriorating.
The statement of activities presents information showing how the government's net assets changed during the
most recent fiscal year. All changes in net assets are reported as soon as the underlying events giving rise to the
change occurs, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this
statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in the future fiscal periods (e.g., uncollected taxes
and earned but unused vacation leave).
The gOvernment-wide financial statements present information about the functions of the Temecula
Redevelopment Agency that is principally supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues (governmental
activities). The governmental activities of the agency include Low and Moderate income Housing,
Redevelopment CIP and Debt Service.
See independent auditors' report.
-3-
11 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
Management's Discussion and Analysis, continued
Year Ended June 30, 2004
Fund financial statements
A Jimd is a grouping of related accounts that is used to maintain control over resources that have been
segregated for specific activities or objectives. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency, like other state and local
governments, uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal
requirements.
Governmentalfinds. Governmentalftinds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as
governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide,
financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near-tenn inflows and ouq7ows of
spendable resources, as well as on balances on spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such
information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financing requirements.
Because the focus of governmental fund is narrower than that of the government -wide financial statements, it is
useful to compare the information presented for govemmental finuls with similar information presented for
governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may be better
understanding the long-term impact of the government's near -term financing decisions. Both the governmental
fund balance sheet and governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances
provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between govemmentalJknds and governmental activities.
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency maintains various individual government funds. Information is
presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of
revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances; all of which are considered to be major funds.
Notes to the Financial Statements
The notes provide additional information that is essential to a full understanding of the data provided in the
government -wide and fund financial statements. The notes to the financial statements can be found on
pages 14-27 of this report.
Other information
In addition to the basic financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents the computation
of the Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund's excess/surplus balance.
Government -wide Financial Analysis
As noted earlier, the net assets for the Temecula Redevelopment Agency decreased (deficit) by $112,422 at
June 30, 2004. The agency's primary source of revenue comes from property taxes and Tax Allocation Bonds.
The agency's plan is to achieve the objectives of the Redevelopment plans. The following summaries of net
assets and change in net assets are presented for the current year prior year amounts for comparative purposes.
See independent auditors' report.
-4-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Management's Discussion and Analysis, continued
Year Ended June 30, 2004
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Summary of Net Assets
June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003
Assets:
Current and other assets
Capital assets
Total Assets
Liabilities:
Long-term liabilities outstanding
Other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Net Assets:
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt
Restricted
Unrestricted
Total Net Assets (Deficit)
Governmental Activities
2004 2003
$ 20,717,560 $ 23,601,831
10.155.881 7.370.994
30,873,441 30,972,82
27,899,008
28,003,733
3,005,531
3,112,612
30,904,539
31,116,345
(31,098) (143,520
L_____aLM $ (143,52)
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Changes in Net Assets
For the Years Ended June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2003
Governmental Activities
2004 2003
Revenues:
General Revenues:
Tax increment
Investment earnings
Other income
Total Revenues
Expenses:
Community Development
Interest expense
Total Expenses
Change in Net Assets
$ 11,896,579 $ 10,949,852
444,411 670,399
500,414 680,209
12,841,404 12,300,460
11,289,231 11,844,030
1,439,751 1,389,402
12,728,982 13,233,432
See independent auditors' report.
5-
11 TEMECULA REOEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Management's Discussion and Analysis, continued
Year Ended June 30, 2004
nFinancial Analysis of the Government's Funds
As noted earlier, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate
compliance with finance -related legal requirements.
Governmental funds. The focus of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's govemmentalfiinds is to provide
information on near -term inflows, outflows, and balances of spendable resources. Such information is useful in
assessing the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's financing requirements. In particular, unreserved fimd
balance may serves as a useful measure of government's net resources available for spending at the end of the
fiscal year. The Temecula Redevelopment Agency tax increment grew by 8.6% or $946,727 over the prior year,
which is representative of the significant development growth realized during the year.
i I Capital Asset and Debt Administration
Capital assets
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency's investment in capital assets for its governmental activities as of
June 30, 2004, amounts to $10.2 million (net of accumulated depreciation). This investment is capital assets
include land, furniture and equipment. More detailed information about the agency's capital assets is presented
L on page 23 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
Long-term debt
At the end of the current fiscal year, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency had $28 miffion of Tax Allocation
Bonds backed by the tax increment credit allocated. More detailed information about the agency's long-term
debt is presented on page 23 and 24 in the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements.
Economic Factors and Next Year's Budgets and Rates
The key assumptions of the Agency's forecast for fiscal year 2004-05 were:
I A 3% increase in tax increment revenue is projected due to strong commercial and industrial development,
as well as increasing property valuations in the project area.
2. To promote, encourage participation in the Farade Improvement Program and to recruit new businesses to
open in Old Town.
3. To encourage private investment in the expansion of affordable housing and partner with non-profit and
for profit developers to construct affordable fandly and senior housing.
All of these factors were considered in preparing the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's annual operating
budget for 2004-05 fiscal year.
See independent auditors' report.
-6-
TEMECULA PEDEVELOPMENTAGENCY
Management's Discussion and Analysis, continued
Year Ended June 30, 2004
Requesb for Infomiation
This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's
finances for all those with an.interest in the government's finances. Questions concerning any of the
information provided in this report or requests for additional financial information should be addressed to
Temecula Redevelopment Agency Finance Department, P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, California 92589-9033.
See independent auditors' report.
-7-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
June 30, 2004
ASSETS:
Cash and investments (Note 2)
Receivables:
Interest
Taxes, including interest, penalties and liens
Notes
Intergovernmental
Other
Land held for resale
Restricted assets (Note 2):
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents
Capital assets (net of accumulated depreciation) (Note 4)
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Interest payable
Deposits
Deferred revenue
Advances from the City of Temecula
Noncurrent liabilities (Note 5):
Due within one year
Due in more than one year
TOTAL LIABILITIES
NET ASSETS (DEFICIT):
Invested in capital assets, net of related debt
Restricted
Unrestricted
TOTAL NET ASSETS (DEFICIT)
Governmental
Activities
$ 13,375,387
61,085
62,740
1,188,566
13,361
4,475
98,484
5,913,462
10,155,881
30,873,441
37,264
16,061
576,819
115,000
638,184
1,512,203
110,000
27,899,008
30,904,539
(31,098)
(31,098)
See independent auditors'report and notes to basic financial statements.
-8-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPNIENT AGENCY
STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES
For the year ended June 30, 2004
Net (Expense)
Revenue and
Changes in
Program Revenues
Net Assets
Operating Capital
Charges for Grants and Grants and
Governmental
Functions/Programs
Expenses Services Contributions Contributions
Activities
PRJMARY GOVEP14NIENT:
Governmental activities:
Community development
$ 11,289,231 $ $ $ -
$(11,289,231)
Interest expense
1,439,751 -
(1,439,751)
Total governmental
activities
$ 12,728,982 $ $ -
(12,728,982)
GENERAL REVENUES:
Taxes:
Tax increment
11,896,579
Investment earnings
444,411
Other
404,983
Gain on sale of property
95,431
Total general revenues
12,841,404
CHANGE IN NET ASSETS
112,422
NET ASSETS (DEFICIT) - BEGINNING OF YEAR
(143,520)
NET ASSETS (DEFICIT) - END OF YEAR
$ (31,098)
See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements.
-9-
I
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BALANCE SHEET - GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
June 30, 2004
ASSETS
ash and investments
Receivables:
Interest
Taxes, including interest, penalties and liens
Notes
Intergovernmental
Other
Land held for resale
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents
TOTALASSETS
LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCES
LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Deposits
Deferred revenue
Advances from the City of Temecula
TOTAL LIABILITIES
FUND BALANCES:
Reserved for:
Encumbrances
Debt service
Land held for resale
Low and moderate income housing
Long-term assets
Unreserved:
Designated for capital projects
TOTAL FUND BALANCES
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
AND FUND BALANCES
Total
Special
Debt
Capital
Governmental
Revenue
Service
Projects
Funds
$ 8,208,292
$ 2,724,428
$ 2,442,667
$ 13,375,387
25,578
6,704
28,803
61,085
12,548
50,192
-
62,740
877,191
-
311,375
1,188,566
13,361
-
-
13,361
3,994
-
481
4,475
-
-
98,484
98,484
1
5,913,461
5,913,462
$ 9,140,964
$ 2,781,325
$ 8,795,271
$ 20,717,560
$ 20,098 $ - $
17,166
$ 37,264
11,040 -
5,021
16,061
100,000 -
15,000
115,000
481,125 -
157,059
638,184
- 1,512,203
-
1,512,203
612,263 1,512,203
194,246
2,318,712
69,801 - 68,900 138,701
- 1,269,122 - 1,269,122
- - 98,484 98,484
8,062,834 - 8,062,834
396,066 154,316 550,382
- 8,279,325 8,279,325
8,528,701 1,269,122 8,601,025 18,398,849
$ 9,140,964 $ 2,781,325 $ 8,795,271 $ 20,717,560
See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements.
10-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPNfENT AGENCY
RECONCILIATION OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS BALANCE SHEET
TO THE STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS
June 30, 2004
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Net Assets are different because:
Fund balances for governmental funds
Capital assets used in governmental activities are not financial resources and, therefore, are not
reported in the governmental funds
Long-term liabilities applicable to the Agency's governmental activities are not due and payable in
the current period and accordingly are not reported as fund liabilities. All liabilities, both current
and long-term are reported in the Statement of Net Assets:
Tax allocation bonds payable
Compensated absences
Accrued interest payable for the current portion of interest due on long-term liabilities has not
been reported in the governmental funds
Net assets (deficit) of governmental activities
$ 18,398,848
10,155,881
(27,960,000)
(49,008)
(576,819)
(31,098)
See independent auditors'report and notes to basic financial statements.
-I]-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPNIENT AGENCY
STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES - GOVERNNEENTAL FUNDS
For the year ended June 30, 2004
REVENUES:
Tax increment revenue
Investment and rental
Other
TOTALREVENUES
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Community development
Capital outlay
Debt service:
Principal retirement
Interest and fiscal charges
Pass -through
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
OTHER FINANCING SOURCES (USES):
Sale of property
Transfers in
Transfers out
TOTAL OTHER FINANCING
SOURCES (USES)
NET CHANGE IN FUND BALANCES
FUND BALANCES - BEGINNING OF YEAR
FUND BALANCES - END OF YEAR
Total
Special
Debt
Capital
Governmental
Revenue
Service
Projects
Funds
$2,379,316
$ 9,517,263
$ -
$ 11,896,579
158,040
23,986
262,385
444,411
335,353
-
69,630
404,983
2,872,709
9,541,249
332,015
12,745,973_
542,808
134,600
1,267,592
1,945,000
2,797,631
-
2,846,688
5,644,319
-
95,000
-
95,000
1,440,939
1,440,939
6,479,524
-
6,479,524
3,340,439
8,150,063
4,114,280
15,604,782
(467,730)
1,391,186
(3,782,265)
(2,858,809)
-
95,431
95,431
1,000,000
1,000,000
-
(1,000,000)
-
(1,000,000)
-
(1,000,000)
1,095,431
95,431
(467,730)
391,186
(2,686,834)
(2,763,378)
8,996,431
877,936
11,287,859
21,162,226
$ 8,528,701
$ 1,269,122
$ 8,601,025
$ 18,398,848
See independent auditors' report and notes to basic financial statements.
-12-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPNIENT AGENCY
RECONCILIATION OF THE STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENDITURES AND
CHANGES IN FUND BALANCES OF GOVERNMENTAL FUNDS
TO THE STATENIENT OF ACTTVrITES
June 30, 2004
Amounts reported for governmental activities in the Statement of Activities are different because:
Net change in fund balances - total governmental funds $ (2,763,378)
Governmental funds report capital outlays as expenditures. However, in the statement of
activities, the costs of those assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives as a
depreciation expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays and dispositon of assets
exceeded depreciation in the current period:
Capital outlay $ 2,881,383
Dispostion of assets (96,496)
Depreciation expense
The issuance of long-term debt provides current financial resources to governmental
funds, while the repayment of long-term debt consumes the current financial resources
of governmental fund. Neither transaction, however, has any effect on net assets.
7 Principal retirement
I Net change in compensated absences
Some expenses reported on the Statement of Activities do not require the use of current
financial resources and therefore are not reported as expenditures in the governmental funds:
Net change in accrued interest
Change in net assets of governmental activities
2,784,887
95,000
(5,275)
1,188
112,422
See independent auditors'report and notes to basic financial statements.
- 13-
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TENECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
June 30, 2004
H1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
History and Organization:
The Temecula Redevelopment Agency (the Agency) was established during July 1991 pursuant to
Tj the State of California Health and Safety Code Section 33000, entitled "Community
Redevelopment Law". The Agency acts as a legal entity, and the City Council of the City of
Temecula (the City) functions as the Agency's governing board. The primary purpose of the
Agency is to eliminate blighted areas by encouraging the development of residential, commercial,
industrial, recreation and public facilities.
The Agency is a component unit of the City of Temecula. City Council members serve as the
Executive Board of the Agency, and thus, the funds of the Agency have been included within the
scope of the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report of the City of Temecula.
j The Agency office and records are located at City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
California.
Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation:
The basic financial statements of the Agency are composed of the following:
Government -wide financial statements
Fund financial statements
* Notes to the basic financial statements
Financial reporting for the government -wide financial statements is based upon all GASB
pronouncements, as well as the FASB Statements and Interpretations, APB Opinions, and
Accounting Research Bulletins that were issued on or before November 30, 1989 that do not
conflict with or contradict GASB pronouncement. FASB pronouncements issued after
November 30, 1989 are not followed in the preparation of the accompanying financial statements.
See independent auditors' report.
-14-
11
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
nNOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTR-TUED):
Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued):
Government -wide Financial Statements:
The govemment-wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net assets and the statement of
activities) report information on all of the activities of the Agency. For the most part, the effect of
interfund activity has been removed from these statements. Governmental activities, which
normally are supported by taxes and intergovernmental revenues, are reported separately from
T business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges for support. The
Temecula Redevelopment Agency has no business -type activities.
The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given
function are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable
with a specific function. Program revenues include 1) charges to customers who purchase, use, or
directly benefit from goods, services, or privileges provided by a given function and 2) grants and
contributions that are restricted to meeting the operational or capital requirements of a particular
function. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported
instead as general revenues.
Fund Financial Statements:
The accounting system of the Agency is organized and operated on the basis of separate funds,
each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. Each fund is accounted for by
providing a separate set of self -balancing accounts that constitute its assets, liabilities, fund equity,
revenues, and expenditures. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in
individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which
spending activities are controlled.
Fund financial statements for the Agency's governmental funds are presented after the
government -wide financial statements. These statements display information about major funds
individually and nonmajor funds in the aggregate for governmental funds. The Agency has no
nomnajor funds.
See independent auditors' report.
_15-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTDaMD)
June 30, 2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED):
Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued):
Fund Financial Statements (Continued):
The funds of the Agency, all of which are major funds are described below:
Governmental Fund Types
The Special Revenue Fund accounts for the monies set aside for low and moderate income housing
projects.
The Debt Service Fund accounts for the payment of interest and principal on long-term debt, and
the accumulation of resources to finance debt service costs.
The Capital Proiects Fund accounts for the financial resources used in developing the project area,
as well as the administrative expenditures incurred in sustaining Agency activities.
Measurement Focus:
Measurement focus is a term used to describe "which" transactions are recorded within the various
financial statements. Basis of accounting refers to "when" transactions are recorded regardless of
the measurement focus applied.
On the government -wide Statement of Net Assets and the Statement of Activities, activities are
presented using the economic resources measurement focus. Under the economic resources
measurement focus, all (both current and long-term) economic resources and obligations of the
government are reported.
In the fund financial statements, all governmental funds are accounted for on a spending or
"financial flow" measurement focus. This means that only current assets and current liabilities are
generally included on their balance sheets. Their reported fund balances (net current assets) are
considered a measure of "available spendable resources". Governmental fund operating statements
present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other
financing uses) in net current assets. Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources
and uses of available spendable resources during a period.
See independent auditors' report.
-16-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCLAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTETUED):
Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued):
Measurement Focus (Continued):
However special reporting treatments are used to indicate, noncurrent portions of long-term
receivables due to governmental funds are reported on their balance sheets in spite of their
measurement focus and, that they should not be considered "available spendable resources", since
they do not represent net current assets. Recognition of governmental fund type revenue
represented by noncurrent receivables are deferred until they become current receivables.
Noncurrent portions of other long-term receivables are offset by fund balance reserve accounts.
Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from nonexchange transaction are
recognized in accordance with the requirements of GASB Statement No. 33.
Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for governmental fund
types excludes amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Since they do not affect net current
assets, such long-term amounts are not recognized as governmental fund type expenditures or fund
liabilities. Amounts expended to acquire capital assets are recorded as expenditures in the year that
resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long-term debt are recorded
as other financing sources rather than as a fund liability. Amounts paid to reduce long-term
indebtedness are reported as fund expenditures.
When both restricted and unrestricted resources are combined in a fund, expenses are considered to
be paid first from restricted resources, and then from unrestricted resources.
Basis of Accounting:
In the government -wide Statement of Net Assets and Statement of Activities, the governmental
activities are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Under the accrual basis of
accounting, revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when the liability is
incurred or economic asset used, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Revenues,
expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange -like
transactions are recognized when the exchange takes place.
See independent auditors' report.
- 17-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
1. SUNflv1ARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTETUED):
Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation (Continued):
Basis of Accounting (Continued):
I J In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the modified -accrual basis
of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net
current assets. Measurable means that the amounts can be estimated, or otherwise determined.
Available means that the amounts were collected during the reporting period or soon enough
thereafter to be available to finance the expenditures accrued for the reporting period.
Revenue recognition is subject to the measurable and availability criteria for the governmental
funds in the fund financial statements. Exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the
period in which they are earned (i.e., the related goods or services are provided). Locally imposed
derived tax revenues are recognized as revenues in the period in which the underlying exchange
transaction upon which they are based takes place. Imposed nonexchange transactions are
recognized as revenues in the period for which they were imposed. If the period of use is not
specified, they are recognized as revenues when and enforceable legal claim to the revenues arises
or when they are received, whichever occurs first. Government -mandated and voluntary
nonexchange transactions are recognized as revenues when all applicable eligibility requirements
have been met. Revenues accrued by the Agency include property taxes levied and collected
within 60 days from the end of the. fiscal year.
Budgetary Practices:
In conjunction with the City's budgeting process, the Agency adopts annual operating budgets for
the Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds that are on a basis consistent with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The legal level of budgetary control,
that is, the level at which expenditures cannot exceed appropriations, is the fund level for these
funds. The Executive Director may transfer appropriations between departments within the same
fund. All increases at the overall fund level must be approved by the Agency's Board.
All unencumbered budget appropriations in the Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds
automatically lapse at the end of the fiscal year.
Capital projects are budgeted on a project -by -project basis in the Capital Projects Fund. Total
Capital Projects expenditures may not exceed appropriations unless approved by the Agency's
Board. Remaining appropriated amounts are carried forward in the Capital Projects Fund to each
new fiscal year until such time as the projects art, completed or terminated.
See independent auditors' report.
M"
q
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
nNOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30,2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTI1,TUED):
Encumbrances:
Unexpended and unencumbered appropriations of the governmental funds automatically lapse at
the end of the fiscal year. As of June 30, 2004 all encumbrances at year-end were closed.
Unexpended appropriations are reencumbered in the following year after reconsideration, without
additional budget appropriations.
Cash and Investments:
The Agency's cash and investments are pooled for investment purposes. Investments are stated at
fair value (quoted market price or the best available estimate thereof).
Land Held for Resale:
' I Land held for resale is carried in the capital projects fund at the lower of acquisition cost or
estimated net realizable value. The land values are re -appraised on a periodic basis and any
adjustments on the properties are shown in the capital projects fund statement of revenues,
expenditures and changes in fund balance.
Capital Assets and Depreciation:
Capital assets, which consist of land, buildings, machinery and equipment, and office furniture, are
reported in the government -wide financial statements. Capital assets are defined by the Agency as
assets with an initial cost of more than $5,000 and an estimated life in excess of I year. Such
assets are recorded at historical cost or estimated historical cost if purchased or constructed.
Donated capital assets are recorded at estimated fair market value at the date of donation. The
Agency has no infrastructure assets.
The cost of normal maintenance and repairs that do not add to the value of the asset or materially
extend asset lives are not capitalized.
Deferred Revenue:
Deferred revenue consists primarily of offsets to loans receivable, which are not currently available
for expenditure.
See independent auditors' report.
- 19-
11 TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June30,2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTRTUED):
Self -Insurance Program:
The Agency participates in the self-insurance program of the City of Temecula. Information
relating to the self-insurance program can be found in the notes to the basic financial statements of
the City of Temecula.
Property Taxes and Tax Increment Financing:
The Agency's primary source of revenue comes from property taxes, referred to in the
accompanying financial statements as "tax increment revenue". The assessed valuation of all
property within each project area was determined on the date of adoption of the Project Area.
Except for certain amounts provided by specific agreement (see Note 7), property taxes related to
the incremental increase in assessed values after the adoption of the Project Area have been
allocated to the Agency, while all property taxes on the "frozen" assessed valuation as of the
adoption date have been allocated to the City and other districts.
Property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on property as of January 1. Taxes are levied on July 1
and are payable in two installments on November 1 and February 1 and become delinquent on
December 11 and April 11. The County bills and collects the property taxes and allocates
installments to various jurisdictions throughout the year.
The County is permitted by California State constitution, as amended, to levy taxes at 1% of fall
market value (assessed value). The growth in the full market value is limited to 2% annually and
the value of new construction and improvements. The Agency receives a share of this basic levy
resulting from incremental growth of the assessed value over a base value established when the
Agency project area was formed or amended.
Fund Balances:
Fund balance reserves represent those portions of fund balances not appropriable for expenditure
or legally segregated for a specific future use. Designated fund balances represent tentative plans
for future use of financial resources.
I
See independent auditors' report.
-20-
n
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED):
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of basic financial statements in conforri-ifty with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions
and affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the basic financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
2. CASH AND INVEST?�M.NTS:
The Agency's cash and investments are presented on the accompanying statement of net assets as
follows:
Cash and investments $ 13,375,387
Restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents 5,913,462
The Agency's cash and investments are pooled with the City of Temecula and allocated to
individual funds except for amounts with fiscal agents, which are recorded in the Debt Service
Fund and Capital Projects Fund.
Interest income from cash and investments is allocated to various funds based on average quarterly
cash and investment balances. Interest income from restricted cash and investments with fiscal
agents is credited directly to the fund.
Authorized Investments:
Under provisions of the Agency's Investment Policy, and in accordance with Section 53601 of the
California Government Code, the Agency may invest in the following types of investments:
* Securities of the U.S. Government, or its agencies
9 Bankers' acceptances
9 Commercial paper of prime quality
Negotiable certificates of deposit
Repurchase agreements
Local Agency Investment Fund (State pool)
Time deposits
Money market funds
See independent auditors' report.
-21-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
H2. CASH AND INVESTMENTS (CONTRTUED):
I
Authorized Investments (Continued):
The Agency also has monies held by trustees or fiscal agents pledged to the payment or security of
certain long-term debt issuances. The California Government Code provides that these monies, in
the absence of specific statutory provisions governing the issuance of bonds, may be invested in
accordance with the ordinance, resolutions or indentures specifying the types of investments its
trustees or fiscal agents may make. These ordinances, resolutions and indentures are generally
more restrictive than the Agency's general investment policy.
Restricted Cash and Investments with Fiscal Agents:
The restricted cash and investments with fiscal agents consisted of $31,243 in money market
mutual funds and $5,882,219 investment in the California Local Agency Investment Fund which
are not required to be categorized under the interpretive guidelines of Governmental Accounting
Standards Board Statement No. 3. The additional information required by GASB Statement No. 3
related to cash and investments is available in the annual report of the City.
California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF)
The Agency is a voluntary participant in the California Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that
is regulated by California Code Section 16429 under oversight of the Treasurer of the State of
California. Per LAIF guidelines, the Redevelopment Agency may invest up to $40,000,000 in the
fund. Investments in LAIF are highly liquid, as deposits can be converted to cash within 24 hours
without loss of interest. The total fair value of LAIF at June 30, 2004 was $57,600,699,158. The
Redevelopment Agency's proportionate share of the fair value of its investments in LAIF
amounted to $5,882,219. Included in LAIF's investment portfolio are certain derivative securities
or similar products, and asset backed securities totaling $923,459,000. LAIF's and the Agency's,
exposure to credit, market, or legal risk is not available.
Additional information required by Government Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 3
regarding the cash and investments pooled with the City of Temecula is available in the. City's
Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
See independent auditors' report.
-22-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINIJED)
June 30, 2004
11 3. LAND HELD FOR RESALE:
Land held for resale consists of property acquired by the Agency and held for resale. The property
is carried in the Agency's Capital Projects Fund at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable
value. The estimated net realizable value at June 30, 2004 is $98,484 with this amount offset by a
reservation of fund balance. Certain properties held by the Agency have been leased to private
parties with future options to purchase the land.
4. CAPITALASSETS:
A summary of capital assets for the year ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:
Balance at Balance at
July 1. 2003 Additions Deletions June 30, 2004
Capital assets, not being depreciated:
Land $ 7,370,994 $ 2,881,383 $ (96,49 $ 10,155,881
Capital assets, being depreciated:
Office furniture and equipment
Less accumulated depreciation for:
Office furniture and equipment
Total capital assets,
being depreciated
Net Capital Assets
5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
7,780 7,780
(7,78 (7,780
7,370.92 L—ObA26
A summary of changes in long-term liabilities for the year ended June 30, 2004 is as follows:
Balance at
Balance at
Due within
July 1, 2003
Additions Deletions June 30, 2004
One Year
2002 Tax
Allocation Bonds
$ 28,055,000
$ - $ (95,000) $ 27,960,000
$ 110,000
Compensated absences
43,733
5,275 49,008
-
Totals
k-2&08 7-33
I—ilSo �000
See independent auditors' report.
-23-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONTEMED):
2002 Tax Allocation Bonds Payable:
in April of 2002 the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula issued
$28,055,000 of 2002 Tax Allocation Bonds consisting entirely of current
interest bonds. The proceeds from the bonds were used to refund the Agency's
Redevelopment Project No. 1 1993 Series A Tax Allocation Bonds, discharge an
obligation pursuant to the County Pass -Through Agreement of the Agency to
the County of Riverside, finance redevelopment activities within or of benefit to
the Project Area and provide for the costs of issuing the 2002 Bonds, including
the premium for the financial guaranty insurance policy and Debt Service
Reserve Surety Bond. A portion of the proceeds from the sale of the 2002
Bonds, together with certain funds made available through the defeasance of the
refunded bonds, were deposited in trust with an escrow agent to provide the
remaining debt service payments on the refunded debt. The trust invests solely
in direct obligations of the United States Government. The advanced refunding
met the requirements of an in -substance defeasance. The Project 1993 bonds
were removed from the RDA!s long-term debt. The amount of defeased debt
outstanding was called on June 10, 2002.
The 2002 Tax Allocation Bonds consist of: 1) $9,030,000 of Serial Bonds with
annual interest rates ranging from 3.0% to 5.0%, maturing on August I of each
year beginning in 2003 through 2020 in amounts ranging from $95,000 to
$755,000; 2) $6,485,000 of 5.125% Term Bonds due August 1, 2027 and
3) $12,540,000 of 5.250% Term Bonds due August 1, 2036. $ 27,960,000
The future debt service requirements on the Tax Allocation Bonds are as follows:
Year Ending
June 30,
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010-2014
2015-2019
2020-2024
2025-2029
2030-2034
2035-2037
Principal Interest
$ 110,000 $ 1,382,716
405,000 1,374,485
415,000
430,000
445,000
2,525,000
3,130,000
3,980,000
5,105,000
6,580,000
4,835,000
1,361,160
1,345,816
1,328,316
5,739,738
5,788,131
4,740,750
3,814,500
2,340,975
516,338
Total
$ 1,492,716
1,779,485
1,776,160
1,775,816
1,773,316
8,264,738
8,918,131
8,720,750
8,919,500
8,920,975
5,351,339
i_51&�25
See independent auditors' report.
-24-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
5. LONG-TERM LIABILITIES (CONTINUED):
Compensated Absences:
This liability represents the total unpaid vacation and compensation time earned
by employees of the Agency.
Total long-term liabilities
6. DITERFUND TRANSFERS:
Mransfers:
RNMEME
Transfers of $1,000,000 were made from the Debt Service Fund to the Capital Projects Fund to
cover operating expenditures in the Capital Projects Fund.
7. PASS -THROUGH AGREEMENTS:
The Agency has entered into agreements with various governmental entities to "pass -through"
portions of tax increments received to entities, which are located within the Agency's project areas.
Tax incremental revenues passed through to other agencies during fiscal year 2004 totaled
$6,479,527
8. AFFORDABLE HOUSING GRANT AND LOAN AGREEMENTS:
The Agency sponsors a program to help first time home buyers afford a home in Temecula. This
program is called the First Time Buyers Program. It provides a 30-year second mortgage at 5%
interest to qualified buyers. The maximum assistance is 20% of the purchase price plus closing
costs up to a maximum of $24,000. The loan is deferred for the first 5 years, and then fully
amortized in years 6 to 30. The balance due the RDA at June 30, 2004 is $158,938 with $70,922
deferred and $88,016 being amortized.
The Agency also sponsors a home improvement loan program. Under this program qualified
residents may borrow up to $5,000 at 5% interest for up to five years. The loan is only made to
fund certain repairs. The program contains provisions allowing the loans to be forgiven at the end
of the five year term if those provisions are not breached. As of June 30, 2004 the RDA was owed
$394,953 under this program.
See independent auditors' report.
-25-
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
NOTES TO BASIC FINANCIAL STATEMINTS
(CONTINUED)
June 30, 2004
H9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
Claims and Judgments:
At June 30, 2004, the Agency was a defendant in a number of lawsuits arising in the ordinary
course of operations, which allege liability on the part of the Agency in connection with workers
compensation and general liability matters. Management believes that potential losses relating to
these lawsuits will not materially affect the financial position of the Agency.
10. NO COMMITMENT DEBT:
On April 25, 1996, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula issued $2,427,500 of
Multifamily Housing Revenue Bonds. The proceeds of the issuance were loaned to the Coachella
Valley Housing Coalition (the "Borrower"), a California nonprofit public benefit corporation, to
enable the Borrower to acquire and rehabilitate a 150-unit multifamily housing rental apartment
development located in the City. A portion of the housing units is rented to persons of very low
income. The Borrower makes loan payments to the trustee, an assignee of the Agency, of amounts
sufficient to pay in full all principal and interest due on the bonds. The bonds are a special
obligation of the Agency payable solely, from revenues of the Borrower and other funds pledged
pursuant to the trust indenture. At June 30, 2004 these bonds had an outstanding balance of
$1,816,000.
On July 17, 1998 the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula borrowed $5,800,000 from
Washington Mutual Bank, FA. The proceeds were loaned to Temecula Gardens LP (the
"Borrower"), a California limited partnership, to assist the Borrower in the acquisition of land,
acquisition and rehabilitation of an existing multi -family housing rental project consisting of 38
units and related appurtenant facilities located on such land, and construction of an additional 38
housing units and related appurtenant facilities located on such site. All of the housing units are to
be rented exclusively to persons or fan -lilies of very low or lower income. The financing has
received a bond volume allocation from the Califonlia Debt Limit Advisory Commission. The
loan is payable solely from project revenues (which include an annual Redevelopment Agency
contribution). The loan is secured by a pledge of project revenues, and deed of trust encumbering
Temecula Gardens, LPs leasehold interest in the project site. At June 30, 2004 these bonds had an
outstanding balance of $17,3 10,000.
The RDA only acts as an agent in respect to these revenue bonds and notes. It does not have any
obligation to pay these debts.
See independent auditors' report.
-26-
REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMAnON
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
BUDGETARY CONTARISON SCHEDULE
RDA LOW AND MODERATE INCOME HOUSING SPECIAL REVENUE FUND
For the year ended June 30, 2004
Variance with
Final Budget
Budgeted
Amounts
Positive
or,27
Final
Actual
(Negative)
REVENUES:
Taxes
$ 2,223,871
$ 2,223,871
$ 2,379,316
$ 155,445
investment and rental
216,000
216,000
158,040
(57,960)
Other
201,000
201,000
335,353
134,353
TOTAL REVENUES
2,640,871
2,640,871
2,872,709
231,838_
EXPENDITURES:
Current:
Community development
904,930
936,401
542,808
393,593
Capital outlay
6,665,370
6,673,361
2,797,631
3,875,730
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
7,570,300
7,609,762
3,340,439
4,269,323
EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER
(UNDER) EXPENDITURES
(4,9N,429)
(4,968,891)
(467,730)
4,501,161
FUND BALANCE - BEGINNING OF YEAR
8,996,431
8,996,431
8,996,431
-
FUND BALANCE - END OF YEAR
$ 4,067,002
$ 4,027,540
$ 8,528,701
$ 4,501,161
See independent auditors' report.
-27-
OTHER SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMAXION
TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
COWUTATION OF LOW/M[ODERATE INCOME
HOUSING FUND - EXCESS/SURPLUS
July 1, 2003
OPENING FUND BALANCE - JULY 1, 2003
LFISS UNAVAILABLE AMOUNTS:
Notes receivable
AVAILABLE LOW/MODERATE INCOME HOUSING FUNDS
LIMITATION (GREATER OF $1,000,000 OR FOUR YEARS SET -ASIDE):
Set -aside for last four years:
2002-2003
2001-2002
2000-2001
1999-2000
TOTAL SET -ASIDE FOR LAST FOUR YEARS
Base limitation
GREATER AMOUNT
COMPUTED EXCESS/SURPLUS - JULY 1, 2003
$ 2,189,970
2,125,311
1,860,100
1,415,019
$ 7,590,400
$ 1,000,000
All Project
Areas
$ 8,996,431
(1,219,805)
7,776,626
7,590,400
$ 186,226
See independent auditors' report.
9 m.
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, LLP
CERrIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS & CONSULTANTS
nA PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATIONS
2121 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 91106-4911
(949) 399-0600 - FAX (949) 399-0610
www,dieh1ev=s.w
MICHAEL R. LUDIN;CPA
CRAIG W. SPRAKER, CPA
NITIN P. PATEI, CPA
ROBERT 3. CALLANAN, CPA
-PHLIP H. HOLTKAMP, CPA
-THOMAS K PERLOWSKI. CPA
HARVEY J. SCHROEDER, CPA
KENNETH R- AMES, CPA
-A�SIONAL�Mn�
September 13, 2004
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER
FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATIERS
BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS PERFORMED
IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS
The Board of Directors
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Temecula, California
We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities and each major fund for the
Temecula Redevelopment Agency as of and for the year ended June 30, 2004, which collectively
comprise the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's basic financial statements and have issued our report
thereon dated September 13, 2004. We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America and the standards applicable to financial audits
contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Temecula Redevelopment Agency's internal
control over financial reporting in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of
expressing our opinions on the financial statements and not to provide assurance on the internal control
over financial reporting. Our consideration of the internal control would not necessarily disclose all
matters in the internal control over financial reporting that might be material weaknesses. A material
weakness is a reportable condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal
control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by
error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited
may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing
their assigned functions. We noted no matters involving the internal control over financial reporting
and its operation that we consider to be material weaknesses.
-29-
OTHER OFFICES ATi 2965 ROOSEVELT STREET 613 W. VALLEY PARKWAY, SUITE 330
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-2389 ESCONDIDO, CALIFORNIA 92025�2598
(760) 729-2343 - FA-X (760) 729-2234 (760) 741-3)41 - FAX (760) 741-9890
ComUliance and Other Matters
As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements of the Fullerton
Redevelopment Agency are free of material misstatements, we performed tests of its compliance with
certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which
could have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. Such
provisions included those provisions of laws and regulations identified in the Guidelines For
CoWliance Audits of California Redevelopment Agencies, issued by the State Controller and as
interpreted in the Suggested Auditing Procedures for Accomplishing Comi)liance Audits of California
Redevelopment Agencies, issued by the Governmental Accounting and Auditing Committee of the
California Society of Certified Public Accountants. However, providing an opinion on compliance
with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion. The results of our tests disclosed one instance of noncompliance or other matters that is
required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards which are described below:
Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code Section 33080.4, a property and blight progress
report must be produced and submitted to the Agency's legislative body and the State Controller on
an annual basis. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003, those reports were not produced and
submitted as required.
This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Members and management of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency and the State Controller's Office,
Division of Accounting and Reporting and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone
other than these specific parties.
LLP
-30-
DIEHL, EVANS & COMPANY, LLP
CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS & CONSULTANTS
A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING ACCOUNTANCY CORPORATIONS
2121 ALTON PARKWAY, SUITE 100
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 926064906
(949) 399-0600 - FAX (949) 399-0610
wwYdiehlevans.com
December 3, 2004
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS'COMPILIATION REPORT
Agency Members
Temecula Redevelopment Agency
Temecula, California
WCHAEL R. LUD�, CPA
CRAIG W. SPRAKEP, CPA
NITIN P. PATEL. CPA
ROBERT J. CALIANAN ' CPA
-PHILIP H. HOLTKAhiP, CPA
-TBONtAS M. PERIOWSKL CPA
-HARVEY J SCHROEDER, CPA
KENNETH R. A�IES, CPA
'A MOITSSION� MMPATION
We have compiled the accompanying Financial Transactions Report and Supplement to the Annual
Report of the Temecula Redevelopment Agency (Report) for the 2003-2004 fiscal year included in the
accompanying prescribed form.
Our compilation is limited to presenting in the form prescribed by the California State Controller's
office information that is the representation of management. We have not audited or reviewed the
accompanying Report and, accordingly, do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on it.
The Report is presented in accordance with the requirements of the California State Controller's office,
which differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Accordingly, the Report is not designed for those who are not informed about such differences.
I .
-�) "OCL 10,
OTHER OFFICES AT 2965 ROOSEVELT STREET 613 W. VALLEY PARKWAY, SMTE 330
CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-2389 ESCONDIDO. CALIFORNIA 92025-2599
(760) 729-2343 - FAX (760) 729-2234 (760) 741-3141 - FAX (760) 741-9890
o4,
c
.2
A
IL
S
Al
E
R
E-M�:�Epz-2`0
X E il EL m
V) N 9L
IL
a z
o m
LOL I Z I LO -�J
0 0
E a E E E E E E E E E
2 2 2 2 m 2 E m
a
CL
E2
IL
c
0
0
0
0
U) z
o
2 2
0
0 0
co
E'5;
E E
n
Z=
8
U)
:a
�o
2 E
B:2 3:
a 0 5
0
0
P
W,
LU 12 �
OR
>
WE a D
0 m w -M 0 0
.0 0 -E Zi
E a-- I
EZ
0 -a -6 0 0 W
E 1:2 2' >7
= 0
8 2 .1 - 9 a
E m .5; 0 m 0
r Z 0 0:5
m E'-
0 oc
E C.0-6 0 0
0 0 m
0
�.G:S 0
a
00-EmmmoE
1.9 0 0 V,�<
0 :E'-- o m
0 , m 0 �
c 0- C
E- 6-4
S � , a E
E 0 0 .2
� m E�v
0 = � ac ,
E ig 0
O.p
A
w
F
0
L) AD
oa 5
11
RD
0
E o
I a , 0
0
UT
5
75
16
.2
E �g
o =
.9
0
—
a. C-) <
0
0
0
0=
Om
E
�5
CL m
V ,
-D
—
:5 a
C
� 0
'm
00
=
E
MOO
E
E
8
o
c
cs
E
0
.8
:m
'a
M:F
E '6
�5
-
0 0
0
0 x
.
t ui
2-
— m
3: 1 0 >-
-- LU
0
CL
m
a.
E
CL
0
0
E
m
z
C-4
LL
m
0
E
'E
F
0
0
a
0
OT
(L
CL
a. c
r
0
w
A
a
E
0
'A
m
co-
0
COO
0
2
11
om
'D
0
0
>-
IL
U)
-0
E
E
0
.-
C)
,
0
z
0
0
L)
0
Q
>
Z
-0
0
0
cS
z
0
z
11
0
0
0
E
w
.2
CL
U)
0
om
0
-
0
0
M
0
a
Lo
0
Z
<
U
LLJ
0
0
<
2-
>
CL
CL
2
c,
m
75
M
0
0
0
C
10
m
C
10
CL
c
<
co
Mo
:E
m
c
0
0
0
0
2
0
ww
w
Lu
z
(L
(L
0 0 0 0 c o E
00 .1-ac
8 a a = a 0
c 0 0 0 m ta 0 , = , 0.-
E c C='O �z '5
E :09 M C m � 0 � > = 0
0 0 0. d R3
-a 2 2 00 0 E
E 8 0
0-
2 E
0
�2 E
O=r
0 =0 mo 00 Lv a 0
0 0 0 0 w -
0 E 62. �5 E�=
.FI.2 0 0 Z 0 T 2 , , m c
.z a E -2 =
CL
2
E
a
0
C-4
LL
CL
m
0 m
Clt
It
C�L
dl
J) a
ce)
CL
CL
E
E
m
0
llf�
U) 0
qT
E
4)
4)
E
z
E
0 IL
"ti
5
0
cL
E5
An
LL
cb
L)
(n
CL
M
7�j
m
F4
CIL
oc�
C71
w
CR
0
0
IQ
IQ
IQ
0
E
E
co
Of
n
o
0
'a
E
Z
z
cc
0
0
LL
cli
C4
N
.1
0
E
z
co w
D 0
E E E
a- < <
19 a < - 'r
.2 Tu a
c
CL
Lu 0
E E
mn iz
0 0 0
E E E
'a 'ffi 76
z .5 .5
a_ m
IL
0
E
76
0
Q
ZN
L)
0
m
20
0
z E
c Q
.2 75
b OC
�-C E
X 0
L)
i6
2
�7
M
0
M i6
02
= o
c
z
0
0 0
M C)
c
0
0
IL
E
0
04
0
E
m
z
a.
CN
m
M 0
we
w
.2 <
0 5 �5 0 W M
.1 m IC5 15 0 z
a_ , 3 = 4 3
'C . C3 w x
E 0 0 0 , 2 S? 2 w 0 0 0 0
:SEE—MM'Fa SE-@E
<
75
- :�, :�, Q .9 E
o la - -
&
0
0 m
a- a_ CL (L
z i5
'.0
0-
7C E
X 0
W L)
0
Za 2
�T
0 0—
= m MO
<
0,
i6
x m
0 m 0
CL
E
0
F7
0
0
m
c
0
0
x
CO
00
Cri
N
E
z
cc
E
0
G
3
<
0
E
<
'Fa
0
E
<
'a
G
wo
m
cl
s
2
w
0
0
4
w
IL
0
0
0
E
0
E
-5
75
0
M
16
0
>-
a
a.
CL
E-
M
:E-�
z
CL
E
E
(L
a.
a.
a.
a-
20
0
z iE
,0
E
X 0
L)
iE
.0
.2-0
a. F
16 2
�7
02
0
M L6
02
o
Z
0
i6
0
0
C o m
7,
CL
E
61
0
'7
r CL
0
r:
CL
0
Z
c
0
z
E
04
4)
E
m
z
t;
IL
a.
E
72
.2
0
<
<
o
E
<
m
o
E
<
a.
CL
.9
<
Lu
.9
<
0
E
IL
0
E
<
a
m
0
E
<
c
CL
'5
0
E
<
c
IL
16
L)
0
0
E
E
0
E
a
0
0
S2
�2
0
z
LU
E
0
.9
U)
0
o c
E
0
IL
E
CL
IL V
4)
E
m
z
T410-
0
0
g
cl�
Cq
-----------
—
C6
Cq
16
m
-,f�
m
L
L
L
.9 U)
CL 0 X C >
E
w
>
76 T E
E -9 o *� 0 &
>
75
S
x
0 C3 0
N
x
LU
E
8
0
1
E
a
CL
x
LLJ
x
LU
E
46
E
4)
E
m
z
a
CD
m
4)
L)
M CD
0 , a,
LL IL
m 0
0
E
0
S
2
m m 0 0
—2 E
c 2'. X <
CL
=0 o .2
m
Z�4
00
G m
CL
x
2 e
LU
E
n
CO
Lu
4)
E
E
a
0
0
—
0
4>1
4)
�o
0 0
4)
:2
z
E
m
0
m
E
z
L)
0
CL
m
E
.7
0
o C�
a(L
a
<
x
IL
L)
*6
LL
(L
0
m 0
(r
Q�
iz
U) 1:
0
0
0
w 0- m
7
'a
m 0
U)
0
E
0
0
E
cc
z
LL IL
co
0
0
2
a-
2
CL
IL
a
E2
.s
I
C6
-a
>
U)
o
-Z3
m 0
ti
0 0
a
C11
r1m, CL
x
LU
IwA —
>
(D
0
-Q! r
0
4L
�io
0 04
E
4- 1
>
ID > 0.-
cc
u =0
E2
o
.0 0
o 0 0 a
'Ej 0
c
z LU
2L
w
m
LL IL 0 0
w 0 WX 0
u .1 0 o
w CL M
17
w
E
8
m
4
6
c 2;
0
ml E
'a 0
6 76
0
om c
E
0
0
IL
a
>
>
U) 0
E E E E
0 1
12 E
0 a
m 0 9 C 'E�
0 8 0 >
0 0 w a D 0 m 0
0 D 0 0 a c 0 cr
CL
Cl)
co
0
0
0
0
.x
c
N w
0
1! E
CL
c
�o
0
0
m
v
�� Lu
E
(L C
Z
m
7m
oc Z�o
E
E
'�i
w
0
=
W'E
0
Z
.2-
0
E
0 E
E
>
E
5
2� of
Z >0
x
E
0
< w
<
V
0
2
'R
0
m E
U) 0
0
r
0 0
0
CL a
w
E 0
0
0 c
*a o
c
5 c
F7
a
2,61,
. :G
50
,
, 0
c
m
o
.=�
>
0
a.
0
0
0
2 E
x
c
m
Z
Z
3
o
o
,
0—
cl 0:
,
L)
0
m
r
2D
Cli
Cl!
0 x
C�t
E
0 0
cli
IL c
CIL
-lj
Li
89
8
m
m
m
Lu
U)
m
m
ca
0
�ow
w
5
co
CT
CL C�
c
1:5
0
0 12!
E E
c
X x
12 0
m
�2
IL
E
E
U)
x
w s
E
8-.2
E
r-
0
E
CL
X
0
>1
0
u r
m
0
E
o
E
CL
.2
4)
CL
0
>
0
mo
0
E
0
CL V
c
IL
0
0
0
40
m 0
-Ci
N
t
0
C
.2
a
0 2
u
(D
LL
E
0
r 0
CD
E
0 E- CL
4) X
E w
E
CL
0
mo
0,
0
E
0
.2 (CL
U)
LLLLLLLLLL
LL
m
.2
t
P
x
0
0
0
0
0
0
E
0
a
x
49
0
CL
UJ
0
a.
0
i
.2
o
S
E
'E
.2
0
o
LU
0
0
0
IL
0'
w
I'K
CL U
a
1
E2
0
0
LLI
0
CL
0)
ul
U)
0
C;
C;
I.:
0 =
E�
0
0
CL
E
x
Lu
r
a
6
L6
m
o
c
m
LL E
U) 0
�o
'cc
E
5,
0
Q
0
m
N
om
oz
4;
w
Cl!
ac�
am
x
.2
E
uj
>
0
C6
'00
E
CL
0
>
0)
T
a
0
z
0
0
v
0
>
0
wo
0
o
m
0
c
U
0
u
L)
IL
w
c
CL
v ,
>
B
2 Lu
0
c 0
2
.2
x
0
m
a
0
alL
x
21
0
LU
0
0
U)
>
Z
:a
E
0
IL
a w
w
2
W.E
0
o
1
w u
�o
wx 0>
.7
0
0
CL
U) 0
U)
m
r-
4)
CL
x
0
CT
0
r
E
uc
CL
0
7F)
>
W
2
LL
V
O(D
:E
73
M
o
v
L)
0
0
0
x
E
E
>
4
e
x
2
&
2
A t�
4
0
2
a
o
12
0
9
Le�
'E
w
t
0
CL
o
-6
c
C
0
U)
4)
Q
cc
M
Cc
c
E fA
m
r-
0
0
0
0
0
0
CL
x
Ew
UJ
0 0
r
M
E-
E
LL
cn
a)
E uc
CL 0)
0 CD
>
0
E
CL
cn
m c
0
'E
>
m
0
u
V
a)
ix
0 E-
-00
0.
w Lu
X X
wow
iL
M
:2
0
0
IR
D
2
0
Supplement to the Annual Report of Community Redevelopment Agencies
For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2004
Redevelopment Agency
ED Number:
13983391700
Name of Redevelopment
Agency:
Redevelopnent Agency of Terrecula
The U.S. Bureau of the Census requests the following information about the fiscal
activities of your government for the 2003-04 fiscal year (defined from July 1, 2003
through June 30, 2004). Governmen s furnishing this information will no longer receive
Census Bureau Form F-32, Survey of Local Government Finances. If you have any
questions please contact:
U.S. Bureau of the Census
Jeffrey Little
1-800-2424523
A. Personnel Expenditures
Report your government's total expenditures for salaries and wages during the year,
including amounts paid on force account construction projects.
I ZOO 1 $ 347,096 1
B. Mortgage Revenue Bond Interest Payments
Report your government's total amount of interest paid on mortgage revenue bonds
during the year.
U20 1$ 1.44n�q4o
U.S Sumu of the Census — Ptevised 05/2004
F-- 1--1-9
LOEM
SAM OF CALIFORNIA �BUSINESS.TRANSPORTATION AND HOUSTNG AQFNCY ARNOLD SCHWAR7FINIMCF11, Qyern
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Division of Housing Policy Development
1800 Third Street, Suite 430
P. 0. Box 952053
Sammento, CA 94252-2053
(916) 323-3177
FAX (916) 327-2643
July 2, 2004 .
MEMORANDUM FOR: Local Redevelopment Agency Officials
6i&.CWWW
FROM: Cathy vreswell, Deputy Director
Division of Housing Policy Development
SUBJECT: Reporting Forms (Schedules HCD-A, B, C, Dl-D7 and E)
Attached are reporting forms to fulfill the annual reporting requirements on the status and use of the low- and
moderate -income housing funds (Low -Mod funds) and housing activities for FY 2003-04. These forms can be
downloaded at our website (b�qp://www.hcd.ca.izo or a word version of the forms can be e-mailed to you.
Many agencies electronically report data using Department of Housing and Community Development's (HCD)
RDA On -Line System Generated Reports in place of submitting paper forms. On-line reporting enables
agencies to self -report, print "summary data" similar to data that HCD publishes in its annual report on
Redevelopment Housing Activities, and provides agencies the opportunity to review and correct data before
submittal to HCD for publication.
State law requires redevelopment agencies (RDA) to file their report within six months of the agency's FY
end (for most agencies, reports must be received by December 31, 2004). Pursuant to Health and Safety Code
sections (Section 33080, et.al.), HCD is required to annually report to the Legislature on the source, use, and
status of redevelopment agencies' Low -Mod funds and agency housing activities. You may download the code
sections at hLV://www.leginfo.ca.pov/calaw.html.
All RDAs, regardless of status (new, inactive, etc.) or choice of reporting method (electronic or forms), must at
least complete the attached HCD cover sheet. Return the cover sheet (and, if applicable, completed schedgI2§1
to the State Controller (SCO) by the reguired due date. To fulfill the reporting requirements, please follow the
guidelines listed below:
I . Cover sheet. Report general information and identify the schedules required to be completed.
2. Please answer each line item or state "not applicable" (N/A) or "none" where a line item does not apply or
there was no activity.
3. Report dates numerically (e.g., report June 30, 2004 as 6/30/2004).
4. Round amounts to nearest dollar and ensure total fund equity is consistent with that reported to SCO.
Please note the opportunity for agency recognition (Item 21 of Schedule HCD-Q. It is important to
showcase your agency's affordable housing projects or programs conducted over the reporting year.
HCD would like to highlight a variety of agencies' housing programs and projects that reflect the important role
of agencies and the service they provide to communities, in its annual report. Agencies can also nominate
exemplary projects or programs for the Director's Housing Excellence Award.
If you desire assistance in completing the agency's HCD report, please call Rita Levy at (916) 324-9629 or
email her at rlevy(a)hcd.ca.gov. Guidelines for Completing HCD Redevelopment Forms are on our website.
Attachments
HCD REPORT OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HOUSING ACTIVITY FOR
FY ENDING: Tn", / 30 /7004
Agency Name and Address: County of Jurisdiction:
REDEVELOPMM AGENCY OF TEMECULA RIVERSIDE
P.O. BOX 9033
TEMECM.A, CA 92%RQ-90-4-4
Health & Safety Code Section 33080.1 requires agencies to annually report on their Low & Moderate Income Housing Fun and housin
activities for the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to annually report on agencies' activities in accordance
with Section 33080.6. Section 33080.3 specifies agencies must send this form, HCD Schedules. and an Audit report to the State
Controller
Please answer each question below. Your answers determine which HCD SCHEDULES must be completed in order for the agency to
fulfill the statutory requirement to report LMJHF housing activity and fund balances for the reporting period.
1. Check one of the items below to identify the Agency's status at the end of the reporting period:
[I New (Agency formation occurred during reporting year. No financial transactions were completed).
Active (Financial and/or housing transactions occurred during the reporting year)
Inactive (No financial and/or housing transactions occurred during the reporting year). ONLY COMPLETE ITEM 7
El Dismantled (Agency adopted an ordinance to dissolve itsell). ONLY COMPLETE ITEM 7
2. How many adopted project areas did the agency have during the reporting period? I
How many project areas were merged during the reporting period? 0
If the agency has one or more adopted project areas, complete SCHEDULE HCD-A for each Proiect area.
If the agency has no adopted proiect areas, DO NOT complete SCHEDULE HQD-A.
3. Within an area outside of any adopted redevelopment project area(s): (a) ! Lid the agency destroy or remove any dwelling units
or displace any households over the reporting period, (b) does the agency intend to displace any households over the next reporting
period, (c) did the agency permit the sale of any owner -occupied unit prior to the expiration of land use controls over the reporting
period, and/or (d)!Ld the agency execute a contract or agreement for the construction of any affordable units over the next two years?'
91 Yes (any question). Complete SCHEDULE HCD-B.
El No (all questions). DO NOT complete SCHEDULE HCD-B.
4. Did the agency have any flands in the Low & Moderate Income Housing Fund during the reporting period?
El Yes. Complete SCHEDULE HCD-C.
El No. DO NOT complete SCHEDULE HCD-C.
5. During the reporting period, were housing units completed within a project area and/or assisted by the agency outside a project area?
El Yes. Complete all applicable HCD SCHEDULES D 1-D7 for each housin_e project comoleted and HCD SCHEDULE E.
91 No. DO NOT complete HCD SCHEDULES DI-D7 or HCD SCHEDULE E.
6. Indicate whether HCD financial and housing activity information has been reported using method A and/or B checked below:
KI A. Forms. All required HCD SCHEDULES A, 13, C, DI-D7, and E are attached.
El B. On-line (http://www.hcd.cagovlrdag "Lock Repore'date: . HCD SCHEDULES not required.
(lock date is shown under "Admin - Area and "Report Change History')
7. To the best of my knowledge: (a) the representations made above and (b) agency information reported arc correct.
Date ature of A41;Azed Alleney Representative
Title
Telephone Number
IF NOT REQUIRED TO REPOR T. SUBMIT ONL Y THIS PA GE.
IF REQ UIRED TO REPOR T. SUBMIT THIS PA GE A AD.
APPLICA BLE MCD FORMS (SCHED ULES A -E) andlor PR OOF OF ELECTRONIC REPOR TING
SUBMIT THIS AND ALL OTHER FORMS HITHA COPY OF THE A UDITREPORT TO THE STATE CONTROLLER:
Division ofA ccounling and Reporting
Local Government Reporting Section
3301 C Street Suite 500- Sacramento, CA 95816
Redevelopment Agency Ammal Report - Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-Cover
Cover (7/1//04) Page I of I
SCHEDULE HCD-A
Inside Project Area Activity
for Fiscal Year that Ended 06 / 30 / 04
PrepareesName,Title:GME ROBERTS, DIRECTOR 0 Preparees E-Mail Address: Genie. Robert0ci ryo teulecula.org
FINANCE
Preparer's Telephone No: 951-694-6430 — Preparer's FacsinlileNo: gsi-694-6479
GENERAL INFORMATION
1. Project Area Information
a. 1. Year I` plan for project area was adopted: 1988
2. Year that plan was last amended (if applicable): N/A
3. Was plan amended after 2001 to extend time limits per Senate Bill 211 (Chapter 741, Statutes of 2001)? Yes— Nox
4. Current expiration of plan: 07 /12 /2028
mo day yr
b. If project area name has changed, give previous name(s) or number:
c. Year(s) of any mergers of the project area:
Identify former project areas that merged:_
d. Year(s) project area plan was amended involving real property that either:
(1) Added property to plan:
(2) Removed property from plan:
2. Affordable Housing Replacement and/or Inclusionary or Production Requirements (Section 33413).
Pre-1976 1)roqect areas not subsequently amended after 1975: Pursuant to Section 33413(d), only Section 33413(a) replacement
requirements apply to dwelling units destroyed or removed after 1995. The Agency can choose to apply all or part of Section
33413 to a project area plan adopted before 1976. If the agency has elected to apply all or part of Section 33413, provide the
date of the resolution and the applicable Section 33413 requirements addressed in the scope of the resolution.
Date: Resolution Scope (applicable Section 33413 requirements): N/A
mo day yr
Post -I 975 promect areas and geogral)hic areas added by amendment after 1975 to pre- 1976 project areas: Both replacement and
inclusionary or production requirements of Section 33413 apply.
NOTE:
Amounts to report on HCD-A lines 3a(l), 3b-3f, and 3i. can be taken from what is reported to the State Controller's
Office (SCO) on the Statement of Income and Expenditures as part of the Redevelopment Agency's Financial
Transactions Report, except for the reclassifying of Transfers -In from Internal Funds and the reporting of Other
Sources as discussed below:
Transfers -In from other internal funds: Report the amount of transferred funds on applicable HCD-A,
lines 3a-j. For example, report the amount transferred from the Debt Service Fund to the Housing Fund
for the deposit of the required set -aside percentagetamount by reporting gross tax increment on HCD-A,
Line 3a(l) and report the Housing Fund's share of expenditures for debt service on HCD-C, Line 4c. Do
notrMrt "net" funds transferred from the Debt Service Fund on HCD-A. Line 3a(3) when renortine debt
service expenditures on HCD-C, Line 4c
Other Sources: Non-GAAP QenerallY Acceptable Accounting 1!rinciples) revenues such as from land sales for
those agencies using the Land Held for Resale method to record land sales should be reported on HCD-A Line
3d. Housing fund receipts for the repayment of loan principal should be included on HCD-A Line 3h.
California Redevelopment Agencies —Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-A
Sch A (7/l/04) Page I of 6
Agency Name: REDEVEIDPMM AGENCY OF TEMECULA
Proiect Area Housin? Fund Revenues and Other Sources
Project Area Name: TEMECUIA PROJECT AREA No. I
3. Report all revenues and other sources of fands from this project area which accrued to the Housing Fund over the reporting
year. Any income related to agency -assisted housing located outside the project area(s) should be reported as "Other
Revenue" on Line 3j. (of this Schedule A), if this prodect area is named as beneficiary in the authorizing resolution. Any
other revenue sources not reported on lines 3a.-3i., should also be reported on Line 3j.
Enter on Line 3a(l) the full 100% of gross Tax Increment allocated prior to Mlicable pass through of funds and deductions
for fees (refer to Sections 33401, 33446, & 33676). Compute the required minimum percentage (0/6) of gross Tax Increment
and enter the amount on Line 3a(2)(A) or 3a(2)(B). Next� report the amount of Tax Increment set -aside before any
exemption and/or deferral (if amount set -aside is less than required minimum M), explain the difference). If any amount of
Tax Increment was exempted or deferred, in addition to completing lines 3aM and/or 3a(5). complete Line 4 and/or Line 5.
To deteniline the amount of Tax Increment deposited to the Housing Fund [Line 3a(6)], subtract allowable amounts
exempted [Line 3a(4)] or deferred [Line 3a(5)] from the actual amount allocated to the Housing Fund [Line 3a(3)].
a. Tax Increment:
(1) 100% of Gross Allocation: S 11,896.57
(2) Calculate only I sct-asidc amount: either (A) or (B below:
(A) 20% required by 33334.2 (Line 3a(l) x LQ%): $ 2,379,316
(B) 30% required by 33333.10(g) (Line 3a(l) x 30%):
(Senate Bill 211, Chapter 741, Statutes of 2001)
(3) Amount of set -aside (Line 3a(2)) allocated to Housing Fund $2,379,316
If, pursuant to Section 33334.3(i), less than the minimum % of Gross Tax
Increment (see 3a(2) above) is being allocated from this project area, identify
the project area(s) contributing the difference. Explain any other reason(s):
(4) Amount Exempted [Health& Safety Code Section 33334.2]
(if there is an amount exempted, also complete question #4, next page):
(5) Amount Deferred [Health & Safety Code Section 33334.6]
(if there is an amount deferred, also complete qucsfion #5, next page):
(6) Total deposit to the Housing Fund [result of Line 3a(3) through 3a(5)]:
b. Interest Income:
c. Rental/Lease Income (combine amounts separately reported to the SCO):
d. Sale of Real Estate:
e. Grants (combine amounts separately reported to the SCO):
f Bond Administrative Fees:
g. Deferral Repayments (also complete Line 5c(2) on the next page):
h . Loan Repayments:
i. Debt Proceeds:
j. Other Revenue(s) [Explain and identify ainount(s)]:
-MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 14,494
-REIMBURSEMENTS 48,236
k. Total Project Area Receipts Deposited to Housing Fund (add lines 3a(6). through 3j.):
$ 2,379,316
$ 128,040
$ 30,000
$ 272,623
Califemia Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Sch A (7/l/04)
HCD-A
Page 2 of 6
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEKECUIA Project Area Name: TEKEGUAL PROJECT AREA NO. I
Exermation(s)
4. a. If an exemption was claimed on Page 2, Line 3a(4) to deposit less than the required amount, complete the following information:
Check only one of the Health and Safety Code Sections below providing a basis for the exemption:
R Section 33334.2(a)(1): No need in community to increase/improve supply of lower or moderate income housing.
n Section 33334.2(a)(2): Less than the minimum set -aside % (20% or 30%) is sufficient to meet the need.
Section 33334.2(a)(3): Community is making substantial effort equivalent in value to minimum set -aside % (20% or 30%)
and has specific contractual obligations incurred before May 1, 1991 requiring continued use of this funding.
Note: Pursuant to Section 33334.2(a)(3)(C), this exemption expired on June 30,1993 but
contracts entered into prior to May 1, 1991 may not be subject to the exemption sunset.
El Other: Specify code section and reason(s)
b. For any exemption claimed on Page 2, Line 3a(4) and/or Line 4a above, identify:
Date that initial (1n) findin wasadopted: /_ Resolution# Date sent to HCD: —
1110 day yr 1110 day yr
Adoption date of nVorting year findin : Resolution # Date sent to HCD: -
mo day yr rEo- day yr
Deferral(s)
5. a. Specify the authority for deferring any set -aside on Line 3a(5). Check only one Health and Safety Code Section boxes:
El Section 33334.6(d): Applicable to project areas approved before 1986 in which the required resolution was sent to HCD
before September 1986 regarding needing tax increment to meet existing obligations. Existing obligations can include those
incurred after 1985, if net proceeds were used to refinance pre-1986 listed obligations.
Note: The deferral previously authorized by Section 33334.6(e) expired. It was only
allowable in each fiscal year prior to July 1, 1996 with certain restrictions.
0 Other. Specify code Section and reason:
b. For any deferral claimed on Page 2, Line 3a(5) and/or Line 5a above, identify:
Date that initial (0) finding was adopted: Resolution #
1110 day yr
Adoption date of reporting year finding: Resolution #
1110 day yr
Date sent to HCD:
1110 ciay yr
Date sent to HCD: /
1110 day yr
c. A deferred set -aside pursuant to Section 33334.6(d) constitutes indebtedness to the Housing Fund. Summarize the amount(s)
of set -aside deferred over the reporting year and cumulatively as of the end of the reporting year:
Amount of Prior
Cumulative Amount
Amount Deferred Deferrals Repaid
Deferred (Net of Any
Fiscal Year
This Renortinli F Duriniz Revorting FY
Aniount(s) Repaid)
(1) Last Reporting FY
(2) This Reporting FY
$
$
I * The cumulative amount ofdeferred set -aside should also be shown on HCD-C, Line
If the prior FY cumulative deferral shown above differs from what was reported on the last HCD report (HCD-A and
HCD-C), indicate the amount of difference and the reason:
Difference: S Reason(s):
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-A
Sch A (7/l/04) Page 3 of 6
Deferral(s) (continued)
5.
KmW4;A;lK@vlF!L1
Project Area Name: TE)fEmA pgojErT ARyA No. I
d. Section 33334.6(g) requires any agency which defers set -asides to adopt a plan to eliminate the deficit in subsequent years.
If this agency has deferred set -asides, has it adopted such a plan? yes F] No El
If yes, by what date is the deficit to be eliminated?
If yes, when was the origina plan adopted for the claimed deferral?
Identify Resolution # Date Resolution sent to HCD
When was the last amended plan adopted for the claimed deferral?
Identify Resolution # Date Resolution sent to HCD
mo
day
yr
mo
day
yr
1110
day
yr
mo
day
yr
1110
day
yr
Actual Proiect Area Households Displaced and Units and Bedrooms Lost Over Reportine Year:
6. a. Redevelopment Pro *ect Activity. Pursuant to Sections 33080.4(a)(1) and (a)(3), report by income category the number of
elderly and nonelderly households permanently displaced and the number of units and bedrooms removed or destroyed, over
the reportinlz year, (refer to Section 33413 for unit and bedroom replacement requirements).
Number of Households/Units/Bedrooms
Project Activity
VL L M AM
Total
Households Permanently Displaced - Elderly
-
seholds Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
To—useholds Permanently Displaced Jotal
Units Lost (Removed or Destroyed) and Required to be Replaced
rooms Lost (Removed or Destroyed) and Required to be Replaced
,Above Moderate Units Lost That Agency is Not Required to Replace
JAbove Moderate Bedrooms Lost That Agency is Not Required to Re�l`ace
b. —Other Activity. Pursuant to Sections 33080.4(a)(1) and (a)(3) based on activities other than the destruction or removal of
dwelling units and bedrooms revorted on Line 6a, report by income category the number of elderly and nonelderly households
permanently displaced over the revortingvear:
Number of Households
Other Activity
VL
L
M
AM
Total
Wo-useholds Permanently Displaced - Elderly
Households Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
Fo-useholds Permanently Displaced - Total
c. As required in Section 33413.5, identify, over the reporfing Year each replacement housing plan required to be adopted
before the permanent displacement, destruction, and/or removal of dwelling units and bedrooms impacting the households
reported on lines 6a. and 6b.
Date
Too day yr
Date I
mo day yr
Name of Agency Custodian
Name of Agency Custodian
IPlease attach a separate sheet of paper listing any additional h
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-A
Sch A (7/1/04) Page 4 of 6
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEMECULA Project Area Name: TEMECUIA PROJECI_ARELNO. I
Estimated Pro*ect Area Households to be Permanently Displaced Over Current Fiscal Year:
7. a. As required in Section 33080.4(a)(2) for a redevelopment project of the agency, estimate, over the current fiscal year, the
number of elderly and nonelderly households, by income category, expected to be permanently displaced. (Note: actual
displacements will be reported for the next reporting year on Line 6).
Number of Households
Project Activity
VL
L
M
AM
Total
Households Permanently Displaced - Elderly
R-o—useholds Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
Households Permanently Displaced - Total
b. As required in Section 33413.5, for the current fiscal year, identify each replacement housing plan required to be adopted before
the permanent displacement, destruction, and/or removal of dwelling units and bedrooms impacting the households reported in 7a.
Date
ITIO day yr
Date
1110 day yr
Name of Agency Custodian
Name of Agency Custodian
I Please attach a !eparate sheet of paper listing any additional h
Units Develol)ed Inside the Promect Area to Fulfill Requirements of Other Proiect Area(s)
8. Pursuant to Section 33413(b)(2)(A)(v), agencies may choose one or more project areas to fidfill another project area's requirement to
construct new or substantially rehabilitate dwelling units, provided the agency conducts a public hearing and finds, based on
substantial evidence, that the aggregation of dwelling units in one or more project areas will not cause or exacerbate racial, ethnic, or
economic segregation.
Were any dwelling units in this project area developed to partially or completely satisfy another project area's requirement to
construct new or substantially rehabilitate dwelling units?
Ej No.
El Yes. Date initial finding was adopted? —/—/— Resolution # Date sent to HCD:—
mo day yr mo day yr
Bumber of Dwellin
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-A
Sch A (7/1/04) Page 5 of 6
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMM AGENCY OF TEMFCM.A Project Area Name: TvmFrm.A pg(ITEr Agli?
.T -A No. I
Sales of Owner -Occupied Units Inside the Pro ffiect Area Prior to the Expiration of Land Use Controls
9. Section 33413(c)(2)(A) specifies that pursuant to an adopted program, which includes but is not limited to an equity sharing program,
agencies may permit the sale of owner -occupied units prior to the expiration of the period of the land use controls established by the
agency. Agencies must deposit sale proceeds into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund andArithin three (3) years from the
date the unit was sold, expend funds to make another unit equal in affordability, at the same income level, to the unit sold.
a.
1.1
Sales. Did the agency permit the sale of any owner -occupied units during the reporting year?
[ENo
[-]Yes it I+— Total Proceeds From Sales Over R--ortin Year
9
Number of Units
ISALES
Vi-
L
M
Total
JUnits Sold Over Reporting Year
Equal Units.
[ENo
E]Yes
Were reporting year funds spent to make units equal in affordability to units sold over the last three reporting years?
$
I+- Total Proceeds From Sales Over Reporting Year
Number of Units
SALES
VL
L
M
otal
Units Made Equal This Reporting Yr to Units Sold Over This Reporting Yr
Units Made Equal This Reporting Yr to Units Sold One Reporting Yr Ago
Units Made Equal This Reporting Yr to Units Sold Two Reporting Yrs Ago
Units Made Equal This Reporting Yr to Units Sold Three Reporting Yrs Ago
Affordable Units to be Constructed Inside the Protect Area Within Two Years
10. Pursuant to Section 33080.4(a)(10), report the number of very low, low, and moderate income units to be financed by any federal,
state, local, or private source in order for construction to be completed within two years from the date of the agreement or contract
executed over the Morting Identify the project and/or contractor, date of the executed agreement or contract and estimated
completion date. Specify the amount reported as an encumbrance on HCD-C, Line 6a. and/or any applicable amount designated on
HCD-C, Line 7a. such as for capital outlay or budgeted ftmds intended to be encumbered for project use within two years from the
reporting year's agreement or contract date.
DO NOT REPORT ANY UNITS ON THIS SCHEDULE A THAT ARE REPORTED ON OTHER HCD-As, B70R Dsl
Cot A
Cot B
Cot C
Cot D
Cot E
Name of
Agreement
Estimated
Sch C Amount
Sch C Amount
Project and/or
Execution
Completion Date
Encumbered
Designated
Contractor
Date
(w1in 2 yrs of Cot B)
[Line 6a]
[Line 7a]
VL
L
M
Total
I Please attach a separate sheet of paper to list additional information. I
California Redevelopment Agencies— Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-A
Sch A (7/l/04) Page 6 of 6
SCHEDULE HCD-B
Outside Project Area Activity
for Fiscal Year Ended 06 / 30 /.04
Agency Name: REDEVEIAWHENT AGENCY OF TEME roject Name: TENECUIA PROJECT ARRA . 1
Preparer's Name, Tide: GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR 0 Preparer's E-Mail AddressCenie.Roberts@cityoftemecula.org
FINANCE
Preparer's Telephone No: 951-694-6430 Preparer's Facsin-ffleNo: o-il-694-6479
Actual Households Displaced and Units and Bedrooms Lost Outside of Pro*ect Area(s) Over Rel)ortiniz Year
1. a. Redevelopment Proiect Activity Pursuant to Sections 33080.4(a)(1) and (a)(3), report by income category the number of
elderly and nonelderly households permanently displaced and the number of units and bedrooms removed or destroyed, over the
reporting ve (refer to Section 33413 for unit and bedroom replacement requirements).
Number of Households/Units/Bedrooms
Activity
VL L M
Total
Households Permanently Displaced — Elderly
seholds Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
seholds Permanently Displaced — Total
Units Lost (Removed or Destroyed) and Required to be Replaced
rooms Lost (Removed or Destroyed) and Required to be Replaced
,Above Moderate Units Lost That Agency is Not Required to Replace
1Above Moderate Bedrooms Lost That Agency is Not Required to ReFla—c
b. Other Activity. Pursuant to Sections 33080.4(a)(1) and (a)(3) based on activities other than the destruction or removal of
dwelling units and bedrooms reported on Line I a, report by income category the number of elderly and nonelderly households
Yermanently displaced over the reporting year.
Number of Households
Activity
VL
L
M
AM
Total
Households Permanently Displaced - Elderly
—
-qo—useholds Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
Households Permanently Displaced — Total
c. As required in Section 33413.5, identify, over the reporting year each replacement housing plan required to be adopted before
the permanent displacement, destruction, and/or removal of dwelling units and/or bedrooms impacting the households reported
on lines Ia. and lb.
Date
mo day yr
Date
mo day yr
Name of Agency Custodian
Name of Agency Custodian
IPlease attach a separate sheet of paper listing any additional h
California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-B
Sch B (7/l/04) Page I of 2
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMENT AG]a= OF TE14Erm.A HCD B (Outside Project Area)
Estimated Households Outside of Promect Area(s) to be Permanently Displaced Over Current Fiscal Year:
2. a. As required in Section 33080.4(a)(2) for a redevelopment project of the agency, estimate, over the current fiscal year, the
number of elderly and nonelderly households, by income category, expected to be permanently displaced. (Note: actual
displacements will be reported for the next reporting year on Line 1).
Estimated Permanent Displacements Number of Households
Activity
VL
L
M
AM
Total
Households Permanently Displaced - Elderly
Wo—useholds Permanently Displaced - Non Elderly
Households Permanently Displaced - Total
b. As required in Section 33413.5, for the current fiscal yeaL identify each replacement housing plan required to be adopted before
the permanent displacement, destruction, and/or removal of dwelling units and bedrooms impacting the households reported on 2a.
Date Name of Agency Custodian
1110 day yr
Date Name of Agency Custodian
Too aay yr
I Please attach a seoarate sheet of oaDer fistina anv additional housine Dlans adomed. I
Sales of Owner -Occupied Units Outside of Proiect Area(s) Prior to the Expiration of Land Use Controls
3. Section 33413(c)(2)(A) specifies that pursuant to an adopted program, which includes but is not limited to an equity sharing program,
agencies may permit the sale of owner -occupied units prior to the expiration of the period of the land use controls established by the
agency. Agencies must deposit sale proceeds into the Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund and within three (3) years from the
date the unit was sold, expend funds to make another unit equal in affordability, at the same income level, as the unit sold.
a. Sales. Did the agency permit the sale of any owner -occupied units during the reporting year?
FINo ------------ Number of Units
ElYes J$ Total Proceeds From Sales Over Renortinp Year
3
lincome Level
VL
L
M
Total
�1
JUnits Sold Over Current Reporting Year
Equal Units.
EINO
MYes
Were reporting year funds spent to make units equal in affordability to units sold over the last three reporting years?
Affordable Units to be Constructed Outside of Project Area(s) Within Two Years From Date of Agreement or Contract
4. Pursuant to Section 33080.4(a)(10), report the number of very low, low, and moderate income units to be financed by any federal,
state, local, or private source in order for construction to be completed within two years from the date of the azreement or contract
executed over the revortiniz ve . Identify the project and/or contractor, date of the executed agreement or contract, and estimated
completion date. Specify the amount reported as an encumbrance on HCD-C, Line 6a. and/or any applicable amount designated on
HCD-C, Line 7a. such as for capital outlay or budgeted ftmds intended to be encumbered for project use within two years from the
reporting year's agreement or contract date.
I DO NOT REPORT ANY UNITS SHOWN ON SCHEDULES HCD As OR Ds.
Col A
Col B
Col C
Col D
Col E
N—ame of
Ag—reement
E;t—Imated
Sch C Amount
Sch C Amount
Project and/or
Execution
Completion Date
Encumbered
Designated
Contractor
Date
(Win 2 yrs of Col B)
[Line 6a]
[Line 7a]
VL
L
M
Total
I Please attach a separate sheet of paper to list additional information. I
Califomia Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-B
Sch B (7/l/04) Page 2 of 2
SCHEDULE HCD-C
Agency -wide Activity
for Fiscal Year Ended k6 /_30 � 04
AgencyName: REDEVIKLOPMENT AGENCY OF TFKFLT19punty: RIVERSIDE
Preparefs Name, Title: GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR 0 Preparer's E-Mail Address: Genie. Robertal0city-af temecula. orE
FINANCE
Preparer's Telephone No: 951-694-6430 — Preparer's Facsimile No: 951-694-6479
Low & Moderate Income Housin2 Fund
Report on the "status and use of the agency's Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund." Most information reported here should
be based on information reported to the State Controller.
1. Beginning Balance (Use "Net Resources Available" from last fiscal year report to HCD)
a. If Beginning Balance requires adjustment(s), identify the reason and amount for each ad'ustment:
Use < $ > for negative amounts or amounts to be subtracted
INCREASE IN RESOURCES $ 75,671
b. Total Adjustment(s) (indicate whether positive or <negative>)
c. Adjusted Beginning Balance [Beginning Balance plus + or minus <-> Total Adjustment(s)]
2. Project Area(s) Receipts and Housing Fund Revenues
a. All Project Areas. Total Deposits [Sum of arnounqs) from Line 3k,HCD-A(s))
b. Other revenues not reported on Schedule HCD-A(s) [Identify source(s) and amount(s)]:
c. Total Housing Fund Revenues
3. Total Resources (Line 1c. + Line 2a + Line 2c.)
UOID&V
$ 8,527,744
$ 468,687
- 8,996,431
$ 2,872,709
11,869,140
Many amounts to report as Expenditures and Other Uses (beginning on the next page) should be taken from amounts
reported
to the State Controller's Office (SCO). Review the SCO's Redevelopment Agencies Financial Transactions Report.
Housing Fund "transfers -out" to other internal Agency funds: Report the specific use of all transferred ftinds on applicable
lines 4a.-k of Schedule C. For example, transfers from the Housing Fund to the Debt Service Fund for the repayment of
principal and interest of debt proceeds deposited to the Housing Fund should be reported on the applicable item comprising
HCD-C Line 4c, providing tax increment (gross and deposit amounts) were reported on Sch-As. External transfers out of the
Agency should be reported on HCD-C Line 4j (e.g.: transfer of excess surplus to the County Housing Authority).
Other Uses: Non-GAAP QGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles) recording of expenditures such as land purchases for
agencies using the Land Held for Resale method to record land purchases should be reported on HCD-C Line 4a(l). Funds
spent resulting in loans to the Housing Fund should be included in HCD-C lines 4b., 4f, 4g., 4h., and 4i as appropriate.
The statutory cite pertaining to Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) is providedfor preparers to review to determine
the appropriateness of Low andModerate Income Housing Fund (LMIHF) expenditures and other uses. HCDdoesnot
represent that line items identifying any expenditures and other uses are allowable. CRL is accessible on the Internet
/website: htti)://www.leginfo.ca. Roy/ (California Low)] beginning with Section 33000 of the Health and Safety Code.
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page I of 8
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMM AGENCY OF TEKECUIA
4. Expenditures, Loans, and Other Uses
a. Acauisitionof Pronertv & Buildine Sites [33334.2(e)(I)l & Housing: f33334.2(e)(6
(1) Land Purchases (Investment —Land Heldfor Resale)* S
(2) Housing Assets (FixedAsset) S
(3) Acquisition Expense S
(4) Operation of Acquired Property $ 40,000
(5)
Relocation Costs
$
(6)
Relocation Payments
$
(7)
Site Clearance Costs
$
(8)
Disposal Costs
$
(9)
Other [Explain and identify amount(s)]:
* Reported to SCO aspart ofAssets and Other Debts
(10) Subtotal Property/Building Sites/Housing Acquisition (Sum of Lines 1-9) $ 40,000
b. Subsidies from Low and Moderate Income Housine Fund (LMW
(1) In Time Homebuyer Down Payment Assistance $
(2) Rental Subsidies $
(3) Purchase of Affordability Covenants [33413(b)2(B)] $
(4) Other (Explain and identify amount(s)]:
MISSIOR VILLAGE $ 305,000
S $ 305,000
(5) Subtotal Subsidies from LMIHF (Sum of Lines I — 4) $305,000
Debt Service F33334.2(e)(9)]. Report LMJHF's share of debt service. If paid from
Debt Service Fund, ensure "gross" tax increment is reported on HCD-A(s) Line 3a(l)
(1) Debt Principal Payments
(a) Tax Allocation, Bonds & Notes
$
(b) Revenue Bonds & Certificates of Participation
$
(c) City/County Advances & Loans
$
(d) U. S. State & Other Long —Tenn Debt
$
(2)
Interest Expense
$
(3)
Debt Issuance Costs
$
(4)
Other [Explain and identify amount(s)]:
(5)
Subtotal Debt Service (Sum of Lines I — 4)
$
d. Plannin2 and Administration costs r33334.3(c)(I
(1) Administration Costs %AQ nQ4
(2) Professional Services (non project specific) 33,714
(3) Planning/Survey/Design (non pro qect specific
(4) Indirect Nonprofit Costs [33334.3(e)(1)(B)] $
(5) Other [Explain and identify amount(s)]:
S
(6) Subtotal Planning and Administration (Sum of Lines I — 5) S 542,808
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page 2 of 8
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMM AGENCY OF TEMECULA
4. Expenditures, Loans, and Other Uses (continued)
e. On�Off-Site Improvements [33334.2(e)(2)] Complete item 13
f, Housing Construction [33334.2(e)(5)] S 2,355,742
g. Housing Rehabilitation [33334.2(e)(7)] 96,889
h. Maintenance of Mobilehome Parks [33334.2(e)(10)]
i. Preservation of At -Risk Units [33334.2(e)(1 1)) S
j. Transfers Out of Agency
(1) For Transit village Development Plan (33334.19) S
(2) Excess Surplus [33334.12(a)(1)(A)] S
(3) Other (specify code section authorizing transfer and amount)
A. Section $
B. Section $
Other Transfers Subtotal $
(4) Subtotal Transfers Out of Agency (Sum of j(I) through j(3))
2,452,631
k. Other Expendin]tres, Loans, and Uses [Explain and identify amount(s)]:
s
Subtotal Other Expenditures, Loans, and Uses $
Total Expenditures, Loans, and Other Uses (Sum of lines 4a.-k.)
$3,340,439
5. Net Resources Available [End of Reporting Fiscal Year]
[Page 1, Line 3, Total Resources minus Total Expenditures, Loans, and Other Uses on Line 4.1.1
$8,528,701
6. Encumbrances and Unencumbered Balance
a. Encumbrances. Amount of Line 5 reserved for firture payment of legal contract(s)
or agreement(s). See Section 33334.12(g)(2) for definition.
Refer to item 10 on Sch-A(s) and item 4 on Sch-B
69,801
b. Unencumbered Balance (Line 5 minus Line 6a). Also enter on Page 4, Line I Ia.
$8,458,900
7- Designated/Undesignated Amount of Available Funds
A, Designated Amount of Line 6b. budgeted/planned to use near -term
Refer to item 10 on Sch-Als) and item 4 on Sch-B 8,458,900
b. Undesignated Amount of Line 6b. not yet budgeted/planned to use $
8. Other Housing Fund Assets (not included as part of Line 5)
a. Indebtedness from Deferrals of Tax Increment (Sec. 33334.6)
[refer to Sch-A(s), Line 5c (2)]. $
b. Value of Land Purchased with Housing Funds and Held for
Development of Affordable Housing. Complete Sch-C item 14. $
c. Loans Receivable for Housing Activities $
d. Residual Receipt Loans (periodic/fluctuating payments) $
e. ERAF Loans Receivable (all years) (Sec. 33681) $
f -Other Assets [Explain and identify amount(s)]:
9. Total Other Housing Fund Assets (Sum of lines 8a.-C) $
9. TOTAL 171 FNn V01 H[TVr1 in, 1; (m,t Rpera,,�c +R� ffm.l Oth�, T-Ta�6.. T7,,nd A ... t�IS
15—IL5
Compare Line 9 to the below amount reported to the SCO (Balance Sheet of Redevelopment Agencies
Financial Transactions Report. [Explain differences and identify amount(s)]:
ENTER LOW -MOD FUND TOTAL EQUITIES (BALANCE SHEET) REPORTED TO SCO
Califomia Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page 3 of 8
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF TEKECUIA
Excess Surplus Information
Pursuant to Section 33080.7 and Section 33334.12(g)(1), report on Excess Surplus that is required to be determined on the first day
of a fiscal year. Excess Surplus exists when the Adjusted Balance exceeds the greater o (1) S 1,000,000 or (2) the aggregate amount
of tax increment deposited to the Housing Fund during the prior four fiscal years. Section 33334.12(g)(3)(A) and (B) provide that
the Unencumbered Balance can be adjusted for: (1) any remaining revenue generated in the reporting year from unspent debt proceeds
and (2) if the land was disposed of during the reporting year to develop affordable housing, the difference between the fair market value
of land and the value received.
The Unencumbered Balance is calculated by subtracting encumbrances from Net Resources Available. "Encumbrances" are finds
reserved and committed pursuant to a legally enforceable contract or agreement for expenditure for authorized redevelopment housing
activities (Section 33334.12(g)(2)].
For Excess Surplus calculation purposes, carry over the prior year's HCD Schedule C Adjusted Balance as the Adjusted Balance on the
first day of the reporting fiscal year. Determine which is larger (1) $1 million or (2) the total of tax increment deposited over the prior
four years. Subtract the largest amount from the Adjusted Balance and, if positive, report the amount as Excess Surplus.
10. Excess Surplus:
Complete Columns 2, 3, 4, & 5 to calculate Excess Surplus for the reporting year. Columns 6 and 7 track prior years' Excess Surplus.
Column I
Column 2
Column 3
Column 4
Column 5
Column 6
Column 7
Sum of Tax
Current
Current
Amount
4 Prior and
Current
Total Tax
Increment
Increment
Deposits Over
Rel?orting Year
I d Day
ftortin Year
I' Day
Expended/Encumbered
Against FY Balance of
Remaining Excess
Surplus for Each
Reporting
Years
Deposits to
Housing Fund
Prior Four
FYs
Adjusted
Balance
Excess Surplus
Balances
Excess Surplus as of
End of RgPortin Year
Fiscal Year as of
End of Reporting Year
0
4 Bpt Yrs Ago
Ag
FY qq—nn
$ 1 415 01
$
$
$
0
3 Rpt Yrs Ago
Ag
FY ()0_01
$1,860,10
$
$
$
o
2 Rpt Yrs Ago
Ag
FY 01-02
$2,125,
$
$
1 Rvt Yr Ago
FY w_m
$2,189,
$
CURRENT
Sum of Column 2
5--
Last Year's Sch C
'
Col 44 minus: larger
—
Adj qustedBalance
ofCol3or$lmm
Reportin
Year
(report positivel
$ 186,226
FY 03-C)q
00
S7.590.400
S 7 �7776 626
$�
$
$ 186,226
11. Reportin Year Ending Unencumbered Balance and Adjusted Balance:
a. Unencumbered Balance (End of Year) [Page 3, Line 6b] $8,458.90
b. If eligible, adjust the Unencumbered Balance for:
(1) Debt Proceeds [33334.12(g)(3)(B)I:
I Identify unspent debt proceeds and related income remaining at end of reporting year S
(2) Land Conveyance Losses [(33334.12(g)(3)(A))]:
Identify Morting year losses from sales/grants/leases of land acquired with low -mod funds,
if 49% or more of new or rehabilitated units will be affordable to lower -income households $
12. 1
kajusteu j3aiance(tor next year' determinationot Excess NUIpIUS)[1-Me it a minus sumot I I b(l)and I I b(;�)] � 8,458,900
Note: Do not enter Adjusted Balance in Col 4. It is to be reported as next year's I st day amount to determine Excess
Surplus
a. If there is remaining Excess Surplus from what was determined on the first day of the reporting year, describe
the agency's plan (as specified in Section 33334.10) for transferring, encumbering, or expending excess surplus:
b. If the plan described in 12a. was adopted, enter the plan adoption date:
1110 day yr
California Redevelopment Agencies - Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/1/04) Page 4 of 8
Agency Name: MEVEIOPMENT AGENCY OF TENECULA
Miscellaneous Uses of Funds
13. If an amount is reported in 4e., pursuant to Section 33080.4(a)(6), report the total number of very low-, low-, and moderate -income
households that directly benefited from expenditures for onsite/offsite improvements which resulted in either new construction,
rehabilitation, or the elimination of health and safety hazards. (Note: If Line 4e of this schedule does not show expenditures for
improvements, no units should be reported here.)
Income
Level
Households
Constructed
Households
Rehabilitated
Households Benefiting
from Elimination of
Health and Safety Hazard
Duration of Deed Restriction
Very Low
Low
Moderate
14. If the agency is holding land for future housing development (refer to Line 8b), summarize the acreage (round to tenths, do not
report square footage), zoning, date of purchase, and the anticipated start date for the housing development.
Site Name/Location*
No. of
Acres
Zoning
Purchase
Date
Estimated Date
Available
Comments
SW CORNER DIAZ/CHERRY
32.32
PUP INS
11-15-94
11-15-94
CANPHq PROJErT
28640 PUJOL STREET
.89
HDR
12-21-99
12-21-99
28731 PUJOL STREET
.23.
14DR
04-16-98
28545 PUJOL STREET
.89
cc
7-31-98
_DA-16-98
07-31-98
I Please attach a separate sheet of paper listing any additional sites not reported above.
15. Section 33334.13 requires agencies which have used the Housing Fund to assist mortgagors in a homeownership mortgage
revenue bond program, or home financing program described in that Section, to provide the following information:
a. Has your agency used the authority related to definitions of income or family size adjustment factors provided in Section
33334.13(a)?
Yes N No E] Not Applicable M
b. Has the agency complied with requirements in Section 33334.13(b) related to assistance for very low-income households
equal to twice that provided for above moderate -income households?
Yes [E No El Not Applicable El
California Redevelopment Agencies —Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page 5 of 8
Agency Name: REDEVELOPMM AGENCY --OF TEMECULA
16. Did the Agency use non-LMIHF funds as matching funds for the Federal HOME or HOPE program during the reporting period?
YES [I NO n
If yes, please indicate the amount of non-LMIRF funds that were used for either HOME or HOPE program support.
HOME $ HOPE $
17. Pursuant to Section 33080.4(a)(I 1), the agency shall maintain adequate records to identify the date and amount of all LMW
deposits and withdrawals during the reporting period. To satisfy this requirement, the Agency should keep and make available
upon request any and all deposit and withdrawal information. DO NOTSUBMITANYDOCUMENTSIRECORDS.
Has your agency made any deposits to or withdrawals from the LMIHF? Yes [I No El
If yes, identify the document(s) describing the agency's deposits and withdrawals by listing for each document, the following
(attach additional pages of similar information below as necessary):
Name of document (e.g. ledger, journal, etc.):
Name of Agency Custodian (person):
Custodian's telephone number:
Place where record can be accessed:
Name of document (e.g. ledger, journal, etc.):
Name of Agency Custodian (person):
Custodian's telephone number:
Place where record can be accessed:
18. Use of Other (non Low -Mod Funds) Redevelopment Funds for Housinz
Please briefly describe the use of any non-LMIHF redevelopment Jbnds (i.e., contributions from the other 80% of tax increment
revenue) to construct improve, assist, or preserve housing in the community.
19. Sueeestions/Resource Needs
Please provide suggestions to simplify and improve future agency reporting and identify any training, information, and/or other
resources, etc. that would help your agency to more quickly and effectively use its housing or other ftinds to increase, improve,
and preserve affordable housing?
20. Annual Monitoring Rworts of Previously Completed Affordable Housiniz Proiects/Programs (H&SC 33418)
Were all Annual Monitoring Reports received for all prior years' affordable housing projects/programs?: Yes El No
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page 6 of 8
2 1. Proiect Achievement and HCD, Director's Award for Housine Excellence
Project achievement information is optional but can serve important purposes: Agencies' achievements can inform others of
successful redevelopment projects and provide instructive information for additional successful projects. Achievements may be
included in HCD's Annual Report of Housing Activities of California Redevelopment Agencies to assist other local agencies in
developing effective and efficient programs to address local housing needs.
In addition, HCD may select various projects to receive the Director's Award for Housing Excellence. Projects may be selected
based on criteria such as local affordable housing need(s) met, resources utilized, barriers overcome, and project
innovation/complexity, etc.
Project achievement information should only be subrrdtted for one affordable residential project that was completed within the
reporting year as evidenced by a Certificate of Occupancy. The project must not have been previously reported as an achievement.
To publish agencies' achievements in a standardformat, please complete information for each underlined category
below addressing suggested topics in a narrative fonnat that does not exceed two pages (see example, next page). In
addition to submitting information with other HCD forms to the State Controller, please submit achievement
information on a 3.5 inch diskette and identify the software type and version. For convenience, the diskette can be
separately mailed to: HCD Policy Division, 1800 3rd Street, Sacramento, CA 95814 or data can he entailed by
attaching theffle andsending it to: atorrens(a),hcdca.zo or rlevv(dlhcd.ca.zo
Project Type (Choose one of the categories below and one kind of assistance representing the l2rim project type)
New/Additional Units (PreviousIv Unoccupied/Umnbabitable): Existine Units (PreviousIv Occunied)
- New Construction to own
- Rehabilitation of Owner -Occupied
- New Construction to rent
- Rehabilitation of Tenant -Occupied
- Rehabilitation to own
- Acquisition and Rehabilitation to Own
- Rehabilitation to rent
- Acquisition and Rehabilitation to Rent
- Adaptive Re -use
- Mobilehornes/Manufactured Homes
- Mixed Use Infill
- Payment Assistance for Owner or Renter
- Mobilchomes/Manufactured Homes
- Transitional Housing
- Mortgage Assistance
Other (describe)
- Transitional Housing
- Other (describe)
Agency Name:
Agency Contact and Telephone Number for the Project:
DESCRIPTION
• Project Name
• Clientele served [owner, renter, income group, special need (e.g. large family or disabled), etc.]
• Number and type of units and location, density, and size of project relative to other projects, etc.
• Degree of affordability/assistance rendered to families by project, etc.
• Uniqueness (land use, design features, additional services/amenities provided, funding sources/collaboration, before/after
project conversion such as re -use, mixed use, etc.)
• Cost (acquisition, clean-up, infrastructure, conversion, development, etc.)
HISTORY
• Timefirame from planning to opening
• Barriers/resistance (legal/fmancial/community, etc.) that were overcome
• Problems and creative solutions found
• Lessons learned and/or recommendations for undertaking a similar project
AGENCY ROLE AND ACHIEVEMENT
0 Degree of involvement with concept, design, approval, financing, construction, operation, and cost, etc.
I Specific agency and/or community goals and objectives met, etc.
California Redevelopment Agencies — Fiscal Year 2003-2004 HCD-C
Sch C (7/l/04) Page 7 of 8
ITEM 3
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINA-r
CITY MANAGER �
CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/Agency Members
FROM: John Meyer, Director of Redevelopment
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Award the Construction Contract for Project No. PW02-20
Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping
PREPARED BY: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
Greg Butler, Principal Engineer
AvIin R. Odviar, Assistant Engineer
RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency Members:
Reject the bid proposal submitted by Pete & Sons Construction Inc. for Project No.
PW02-20 Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping.
2. Award a construction contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern Gateway
Landscaping, to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of $351,930.50 and
authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract.
Award a maintenance contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern Gateway
Landscaping, to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of $3,600.00 and
authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract.
Authorize the Executive Director to approve change orders not to exceed the
contingency amount of $35,553.05, which is equal to 10% of the combined contract
amount.
5. Transfer $40,000.00 from the Escallier House Relocation to the Old Town Southern
Gateway Landscaping project construction Account no. 280-190-833-5804.
BACKGROUND: On October 26, 2004 the Agency Members approved the Construction Plans
and Specifications and authorized the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for the
subject project.
The project involves the placement of landscaping, irrigation, curb & gutter, walkways, decorative
lighting, sifting areas, and fencing for remnant parcels located atthe southern entrance to Old Town.
The project will eliminate undeveloped areas and enhance the appearance of the gateway.
To assure project eligibility for reimbursement by the State Resources Agency's Environmental
Enhancement and Mitigation (EEM) program in the amount of $250,000, a separate maintenance
contract is sought for 90 Day Landscape Maintenance, bid itemno.21. This item of workwill not be
RAAGENDA REPORTS\2004\121404\PW02-20AWARD.DOC
completed by April 30, 2005, which is the EEM grant deadline.
The construction contract will cover the balance of items (bid item nos. I through 20, 22, and 23),
and represents the majority of construction costs. It is anticipated that these items of work will be
completed, billed, and reported prior to the EEM deadline.
Three (3) bids were received and publicly opened on Tuesday, December 7,2004. The results were
as follows:
1 . International Pavement Solutions
$355,530.50
2. American West Landscaping, Inc.
$436,628.38
3. Pete & Sons Construction, Inc.
Nonresponsive
A copy of the bid summary is available for review in the City Engineer's office.
Staff has reviewed the bid proposals and found a minor mathematical error in one bid, and deemed
another nonresponsive due to several errors. The above bid results reflect corrected dollar
amounts. The corrections did not impact the position of the lowest responsible bidder, International
Pavement Solutions of San Bernardino, California. International Pavement Solutions has
experience in the construction of hardscape and installation of landscaping and has successfully
completed similar projects for the City in the past.
The bid proposal submitted by Pete & Sons Construction, Inc. was found to contain numerous
substantive errors, inconsistencies, and discrepancies, which made the schedule of prices and total
bid amount irreconcilable. As a result, the proposal is deemed nonresponsive and staff
recommends rejecting the bid.
The Engineer's estimate for this project was $251,000.00. The specifications allow thirty (30)
working days for the completion of this project, excluding the 90 Day Landscape Maintenance
period. To assure reimbursement through the EEM Program, a condensed work period is specified.
This necessitates an aggressive and expeditious construction schedule. The disparity between the
Engineer's estimate and the low bid can be accounted for by the short turnaround time required to
deliver the specialty lighting system.
FISCAL IMPACT: The Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping is a Capital Improvement
Project funded through the Redevelopment Agency and EEM Grant funds. With the transfer of
$40,000.00 f rom the E scallier H ouse Relocation, adequate funds are available in the Project
construction Account No. 280-199-833-5804. Sufficient funds are available in the Escallier House
Relocation Account No. 280-199-835-5607 for this transfer. The total project cost is $391,083.55,
which includes the construction contract amount of $351,930.50, plus the maintenance contract
amount of $3,600.00, plus 10% contingency of $35,553.05.
ATTACHMENT:
1 . Contracts
2. Location Map
3. Project Description
RAGENDA REPORTS\2004\121404\PW02-20AWARD.DOC
I I I
ro)
N
CA
0
z
>4
0
T
964
0
0
0
H
0
0 CD w 00
2,
U Go� 60� W) 60� fo%
ag
C4
e4
CD 0 (D 00 00
C� Cl� lr�
4
eq
CD
co C�L
61 ss 6s
r
r
4 -1
,t:
0 0 0 0
u u C) �-
C� llc�
cr>
64 61) 1 GAI
C4
W. M
CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRACT
FOR
PROJECT NO. PW02-20
OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into the 14th day of December, 2004 by and between the
City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "CITY", and International
Pavement Solutions, hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR."
WITNESSETH:
That CITY and CONTRACTOR, for the consideration hereinafter named, mutually agree
as follows:
CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. The complete Contract includes all of the Contract
Documents, to wit: Notice Inviting Bids, Instructions to Bidders, Proposal, Performance
Bond, Labor and Materials Bond, Plans and Specifications entitled PROJECT NO. PW02-
20, OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING, Insurance Forms, this
Contract, and all modifications and amendments thereto, the State of California Standard
Plans and Specifications for Construction of Local Streets and Roads, (latest edition),
issued by the California Department of Transportation, where specifically referenced in the
Plans, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications, and the latest version of the
Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction, including all supplements as
written and promulgated by Public Works Standards, Inc (hereinafter, "Standard
Specifications") as amended by the General Specifications, Special Provisions, and
Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO. PW02-20, OLD TOWN SOUTHERN
GATEWAY LANDSCAPING. Copies of these Standard Specifications are available from
the publisher:
BNi Building News
Division of BNi Publications, Inc.
1612 South Clementine St.
Anaheim, California 92802
(714) 517-0970
The Standard Specifications will control the general provisions, construction materials,
and construction methods for this Contract except as amended by the General
Specifications, Special Provisions, and Technical Specifications for PROJECT NO.
PW02-20, OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING.
In case of conflict between the Standard Specifications and the other Contract
Documents, the other Contract Documents shall take precedence over, and be used in
lieu of, such conflicting portions.
Where the Contract Documents describe portions of the work in general terms, but not in
complete detail, it is understood that the item is to be furnished and installed completed
and in place and that only the best general practice is to be used. U nless otherwise
specified, the CONTRACTOR shall furnish all labor, materials, tools, equipment, and
incidentals, and do all the work involved in executing the Contract.
EXHIBIT E E-1 RACIPPROJECMPWOPW02-20 Gateway andscape\specs�Construction Contract.doc
The Contract Documents are complementary, and what is called for by anyone shall be as
binding as if called for by all. Any conflict between this Contract and any other Contract
Document shall be resolved in favor of this Contract.
2. SCOPE OF WORK. CONTRACTOR shall perform everything required to be performed,
shall provide an mish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment,
and all utility and transportation services required for the following:
PROJECT NO. PW02-20, OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING
All of said work to be performed and materials to be furnished shall be in strict accordance
with the Drawings and Specifications and the provisions of the Contract Documents
hereinabove enumerated and adopted by CITY.
3. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished
and work performed and completed under the direction and supervision, and subject to
the approval of CITY or its authorized representatives.
4. CONTRACT AMOUNT AND SCHEDULE. The CITY agrees to pay, and CONTRACTOR
agrees to accept, in full payment for, the work agreed to be done, the sum of: THREE
HUNDRED FIFTY ONE THOUSAND NINE HUNDRED THIRTY DOLLARS and FIFTY
CENTS ($351,930.50), the total amount of the base bid.
CONTRACTOR agrees to complete the work in a period not to exceed thirty (30) working
days, exclusive of the 90 Day Landscape Maintenance period, commencing with delivery
of a Notice to Proceed by CITY. Construction shall not commence until bonds and
insurance are approved by CITY.
5. CHANGE ORDERS. All change orders shall be approved by the City Council, except that
the City Manager is hereby authorized by the City Council to make, by written order,
changes or additions to the work in an amount not to exceed the contingency as
established by the City Council.
PAYMENTS
A. LUMP SUM BID SCHEDULE:
Before submittal of the first payment request, the CONTRACTOR shall submit to
the City Engineer a schedule of values allocated to the various portions of the
work, prepared in such form and supported by such data to substantiate its
accuracy as the City Engineer may require. This schedule, as approved by the
City Engineer, shall be used as the basis for reviewing the CONTRACTOR's
payment requests.
B. UNIT PRICE BID SCHEDULE:
Pursuant to Section 20104.50 of the Public Contract Code, within thirty (30) days
after submission of a payment request to the CITY, the CONTRACTOR shall be
paid a sum equal to ninety percent (90%) of the value of the work completed
according to the bid schedule. Payment request forms shall be submitted on oi
EXHIBIT E E-2 RACIRPROJECTUMARW02-20 Gateway Iandscae6specs�Constructlon Gontract.doc
about the thirtieth (30th) day of each successive month as the work progresses.
The final payment, if unencumbered, or any part thereof unencumbered, shall be
made sixty (60) days after acceptance of final payment and the CONTRACTOR
filing a one-year Warranty and an Affidavit of Final Release with the CITY on forms
provided by the CITY.
C. Payments shall be made on demands drawn in the manner required by law,
accompanied by a certificate signed by the City Manager, stating that the work for
which payment is demanded has been performed in accordance with the terms of
the Contract, and that the amount stated in the certificate is due under the terms of
the Contract. Partial payments on the Contract price shall not be considered as an
acceptance of any part of the work.
D. Interest shall be paid on all undisputed payment requests not paid within thirty (30)
days pursuant to Public Contracts Code Section 20104.50. Public Contract Code
Section 7107 is hereby incorporated by reference.
E. In accordance with Section 9-3.2 of the Standard Specifications for Public Works
Construction and Section 9203 of the Public Contract Code, a reduction in the
retention may be requested by the Contractor for review and approval by the
Engineer if the progress of the construction has been satisfactory, and the project
is more than 50% complete. The Council hereby delegates its authority to reduce
the retention to the Engineer.
LIQUIDATED DAMAGES — EXTENSION OF TIME. In accordance with Government
Code Section 53069.85, CONTRACTOR agrees to forfeit and pay to CITY the sum of one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) per day for each calendar day completion is delayed beyond
the time allowed pursuant to Paragraph 4 of this Contract. Such sum shall be deducted
from any payments due to or to become due to CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR will be
granted an extension of time and will not be assessed liquidated damages for
unforeseeable delays beyond the control of, and without the fault or negligence of, the
CONTRACTOR including delays caused by CITY. CONTRACTOR is required to promptly
notify CITY of any such delay.
WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making each request for payment under Paragraph 6
above, CONTRACTOR shall submit to CITY, in writing, all claims for compensation as to
work related to the payment. Unless the CONTRACTOR has disputed the amount of the
payment, the acceptance by CONTRACTOR of each payment shall constitute a release of
all claims against the CITY related to the payment. CONTRACTOR shall be required to
execute an affidavit, release, and indemnity agreement with each claim for payment.
9. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of
the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per
them wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each
craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contract, from the Director
of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are available from the California
Department of Industrial Relation's Internet Web Site at http://www.dir.ca.gov.
CONTRACTOR shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the
adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. CONTRACTOR shall comply with the
provisions of Section 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code.
EXHIBIT E E-3 RAC1RPR0JECTS\PW02PW02-20 Gateway andscape�specs�Construcfion Untract.dw
Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, CONTRACTOR shall forfeit to the
CITY, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each
laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for
any work done under this Contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation
of the provisions of the Contract.
10. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this contract. All workshallbe
complete and invoiced by March 31, 2005, exclusive of the 90 Day Landscape
Maintenance.
11. INDEMNIFICATION. All work covered by this Contract done at the site of construction or
in preparing or cl�livering materials to the site shall be at the risk of CONTRACTOR alone.
CONTRACTOR agrees to save, indemnify, hold harmless and defend CITY, its officers,
employees, and agents, against any and all liability, injuries, or death of persons
(CONTRACTOR's employees included) and damage to property, arising directly or
indirectly out of the obligations herein undertaken or out of the operations conducted by
CONTRACTOR, save and except claims or litigations arising through the sole active
negligence or sole willful misconduct of the CITY.
The CONTRACTOR shall indemnify and be responsible for reimbursing the CITY for any
and all costs incurred by the CITY as a result of Stop Notices filed against the project. The
CITY shall deduct such costs from Progress Payments or final payments due to the CITY.
12. GRATUITIES. CONTRACTOR warrants that neither it nor any of its employees, agents, or
representatives has offered or given any gratuities or promises to CITY's employees,
agents, or representatives with a view toward securing this Contract or securing favorable
treatment with respect thereto.
13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST. CONTRACTOR warrants that he has no blood or marriage
relationship, and that he is not in any way associated with any City officer or employee, or
any architect, engineer, or other preparers of the Drawings and Specifications for this
project. CONTRACTOR further warrants that no person in its employ has been employed
by the CITY within one year of the date of the Notice Inviting Bids.
14. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the work contemplated by this
Contract, CONTRACTOR shall file with the City Manager, its affidavit stating that all
workmen and persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors
upon the Project have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against
the Project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an
affidavit c overing d isputed c laims o r i tems i n c onnection w ith a S top N otice w hich h as
been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California.
15. NOTICE TO CITY OF LABOR DISPUTES. Whenever CONTRACTOR has knowledge
that any actual or potential labor dispute is delaying or threatens to delay the timely
performance of the Contract, CONTRACTOR shall immediately give notice thereof,
including all relevant information with respect thereto, to CITY.
16. BOOKS AND RECORDS. CONTRACTOR's books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable
times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the CITY.
EXHIBIT E E4 RACIRPROJECTSMZPW02-20 Gateway landscape��\Gonstruction Contract.doc
17. INSPECTION. The work shall be subject to inspection and testing by CITY and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and
places, including without limitation, the plans of CONTRACTOR and any of its suppliers.
CONTRACTOR shall provide all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and
convenience of inspectors. All inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner
as to not unduly delay the work. The work shall be subject to final inspection and
acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final
inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the work.
18. DISCRIMINATION. CONTRACTOR represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national
origin, color, sex age, or handicap.
19. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the
State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to
this Contract and also govern the interpretation of this Contract. Any litigation concerning
this Contract shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with
geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the
parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be
entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
20. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of
a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the
proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no
board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether
contractual, non -contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business
of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest
comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all
such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest
would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 (commencing with Section
1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the
Government Code of the State of California.
21. ADA REQUIREMENTS. By signing this contract, Contractor certifies that the Contractor
is in total compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public Law 101-
336, as amended.
22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any written notice required to be given in any part of the Contract
Documents shall be performed by depositing the same in the U.S. Mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the address of the CONTRACTOR as set forth in the Contract Documents,
and to the CITY addressed as follows:
Mailing Address: Street Address:
William G. Hughes William G. Hughes
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Director of Public Works/City Engineer
City of Temecula City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula. CA 92589-9033 Temecula. CA 92590-3606
EXHIBIT E E-5 RUPPROJECTSTWOOPW02-20 Gateway andscape\spem�Gonstrucfian Contract.dw
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed on the
date first above written.
DATED: CONTRACTOR
International Pavement Solutions
P.O. Box 10458
San Bernardino, CA 92423-0458
(909) 794-2101
Brent C. Rieger, President
Dennis C. Rieger, Treasurer/CEO
(Signatures of two corporate officers required for Corporations)
DATED:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
ATTEST:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
EXHIBIT E E-6 RACIRPROJECTWWONW02-20 Gateway andscape�specs�Construcfion Contract.doc
CITY OF TEMECULA
CONTRACT AGREEMENT
FOR
MAINTENANCE OF THE
OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING
PROJECT NO. PWOI-05
THIS CONTRACT, made and entered into as of December 14,2004 by and between
the City of Temecula, and International Pavement Solutions.("Contractor'). In consideration of
the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows:
1 . SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall complete all of the work described in the Scope
of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Scope of Work") and shall provide
and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and
transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be
furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of
Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractorshall
not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City of Temecula.
a. TERM. This Agreement shall commence on December 14,2004, and shall
remain and continue in effect until June 30, 2005, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the
provisions of this Agreement.
2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section 1 of this Agreement
Contractor shall receive the sum of Three Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No Cents
($3,600.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in
this Agreement.
Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its
performance of this Agreement that are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional
services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be
compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City
Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the
performance of said services. The City Manager may approve additional work not to exceed ten
percent (10%) of the amount of the Agreement, but in no event shall such sum exceed twenty-five
thousand dollars ($25,000.00). Any additional work in excess of this amount shall be approved by
the City Council.
3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly, or at another agreed to
interval, for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth
business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made
within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of
contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of
any disputed fees set forth on the invoice.
4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best
of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall
employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in
providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under
this Agreement. Contractor shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the
site during all construction and to oversee and supervise the Work.
5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be
furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized
representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of
acceptance.
R:\C1P\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway [andscape\specs\Maintertance Contract.doc
6. CHANGE ORDERS. The City Manager may approve additional payment not to
exceed 10% of the Agreement. Change orders exceeding these limits shall be approved by the City
Council.
7. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under
Paragraph 2., above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation
under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall
constitute a waiver of all claims against the City under or arising out of this Contract except those
previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an
affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment.
8. PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor
Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per them
wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality foreach craft, classification,
or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of
Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at
the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site
and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the
provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant
to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the
sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic
employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by
him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. Payroll records
shall be submitted to the City with each pay request. Progress payments will be withheld pending
receipt of any outstanding reports.
9. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE.
a. 'The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or
terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10)
days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all
work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates
a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the
remainder of this Agreement.
b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City
shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided
that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this
Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3.
10. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR.
a. The Contractors failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall
constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this
Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any
work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written
notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of
work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence
of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default.
b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default
in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor
with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said
notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the
Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right,
R:\C1P\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway lands�pe\specs\Maintenance Contract.doc
notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further
notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under
this Agreement.
111. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold
harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all
claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City,
its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for
injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractors negligent orwrongful
acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting
only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City.
12. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of
the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise
from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents,
representatives, or employees.
Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as:
(1) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage
(occurrence form CG 0001).
(2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering
Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto).
(3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of
California and Employer's Liability Insurance.
b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less
than:
(1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury,
personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability
Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either
the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this
project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the
required occurrence limit.
(2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and
property damage.
(3) Employers Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or
disease.
C. Deductibles and Self -insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured
retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City
Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self -insured retentions as
respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a
bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense
expenses.
d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be
covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities
R:\C1P\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway 1andscape\specs\Maintet=ce ContractAm
performed by or on behalf of the Contractor; products and completed
operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by
the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by
the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on
the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials,
employees or volunteers.
(2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractors insurance
coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers,
officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured
maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers
shall be excess of the Contractors insurance and shall not contribute
with it.
(3) Any failure to complywith reporting orother provisions of the policies
including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to
the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers.
(4) The Contractors insurance shall apply separately to each insured
againstwhom claim is made or suit is brought, exceptwith respectto
the limits of the insurer's liability.
(5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to
state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by
either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30)
days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested,
has been given to the City.
e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a
current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City.
f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original
endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a
person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on
forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the Distdct before
work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractors insurer may provide
complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the�
coverage required by these specifications.
9- Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies:
"I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every
employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake
self-insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with
such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract."
13. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract.
14. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to
the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this
Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and
control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the
conduct of Contractor or any of Contractors officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this
Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers,
employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall
not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind the
4
R:TIP\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway 1andscape\specs\Maintemnce Contract.doc .
City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the
performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the
Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for
performing services hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or
indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder.
15. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and
Federal laws and regulations that in any manner affect those employed by it or in anyway affect the
performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe
and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not
be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section.
16. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of
conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be
encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the
necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial
investigations or reports prepared by the City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will
be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every
detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims
whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time.
17. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work contemplated by
this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and
persons employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid
in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials,
except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in
connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of
California.
18. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractors books, records, and plans or such part
thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be
subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City.
19. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to
locating utility facilities pursuant to �alifornia Government Code Section 4215.
20. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the
appropriate regional notification center in accordance wiih Government Code Section 4215.
21. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its
authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places,
including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide
all reasonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. All inspections
and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be
subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections.
Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the Work.
22. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agre es that it will not,
discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color,
sex, age, or handicap.
23. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other
party under this Agreement must �e in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii)
delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that
provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail,
UCIPTROJECTSTW02TW02-20 Gateway landscape\sp�s\Maintemnce ContractAm
certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as
set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice:
To City: City of Temecula
P 0 Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, California 92590
Attention: City Manager
To Contractor: International Pavement Solutions
P.O. Box 10458
San Bernardino, CA 92423-0458
Attention: Brent C. Rieger, President
(909) 794-2101
24. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement,
nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City of
Temecula.
25. LICENSES. At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in
full force and effect, all licenses required of it bylaw for the performance of the services descdbed in
this Agreement.
26. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of
the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this
Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this
Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over
the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the
prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees
and litigation costs incurred in the litigation.
27. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula
or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds
thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter.
Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board
member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non -
contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party
other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party
at any time, a full and complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the
other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under
Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4.6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division
4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California.
28. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the
parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or
contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are
merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entedng into this
Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own
independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material.
29. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing
this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to
RACIPTROJECTSTW02TW02-20 Gateway landscape\specsNaintenance Contract.doc
execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the
performance of its obligations hereunder.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the
day and year first above written.
CITY OF TEMECULA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
Jeff Comerchero, Chairman
Attest:
Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk
Approved As to Form:
Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney
CONTRACTOR
INTERNATIONAL PAVEMENT SOLUTIONS
P.O. Box 10458
San Bernardino, CA 92423-0458
(909) 794-2101
Brent C. Rieger, President
Dennis C. Rieger, Tresurer/CEO
(Signatures of two corporate officers for Corporations
7
RACIPTROJECTSTW02TW02-20 Gateway landscape%specsWainteriance Contract.doc
I EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
MAINTENANCE OF THE
OLD TOWN SOUTHERN GATEWAY LANDSCAPING
PROJECT NO. PWOI-05
MAINTENANCE SERVICES
A. General
Contractor shall maintain all plants in a vigorous, thriving condition bywatering, weeding, cultivating,
and any other necessary operations during the entire period of installation and until final acceptance
by the Owner as advised by the Project Biologist. Improper maintenance that may cause the poor
condition of planted material at termination of the scheduled contract period shall cause
postponement of final acceptance of work. Payment for annual maintenance activities shall be
made monthly in accordance with the annual bid amount. Upon termination of maintenance
activities the Contractor shall be paid the pro rata amount for the year in which the contract is
terminated. The Owner shall pay for metered water used for watering landscape materials.
B. Weeding:
1. Weeds shall be removed by the Contractor at lease once a month during the first two
years, once every four months for years three and four, and twice a year during year five. More
frequent monitoring will be preformed as necessary or as recommended by the Project Biologist to
keep weeks at manageable levels. A licensed Pest Control Advisor shall be consulted if specific
pest control recommendations are required.
2. Weeds and their root systems shall be removed completely, and watering shall
precede weeding if necessary to facilitate root removal. Manual weed removal is preferred and
herbicides, applied by a licensed professional, shall only be used as approved by the Project
Biologist.
C. Pest Control
1 . Insect infestations and plant diseases will be monitored by the Project Biologist and
reported to the owner. The Contractor shall consult a licensed Pest Control Advisor for any
extensive pest control measures.
2. Pesticide and herbicide use beyond that approved for weed eradication is strictly
prohibited unless authorized by the Project Biologist. Biological control agents, such as insect
predators, may be used at the discretion of the Project Biologist and as approved by the Owner.
3. Common pests and diseases that occur naturally in the environment and are not
harmful to plants shall be identified as tolerated and no cultural treatments shall be allowed.
D. Herbivory:
The Contractor shall monitor for herbivory of plants and shall inform the Project Biologist within 24
hours of discovery, who shall then prescribe remedial actions. Any remedial actions, such as
fencing, shall be provided at Owner's expense.
8
RACIPTROJECTSTW02TW02-20 Gateway landscape\specsWaintenance Contract.doc
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
E. Leaf Drop and Organic Debris:
Leaf and branch drop shall be retained unless specially required to be removed for brush
management purposes as directed by the Project Biologist.
F. Debris Removal:
The Contractor shall remove and dispose off site all non -organic debris. Removal of trash and litter
shall continue on a regular basis during the establishment maintenance period. Organic debris
created from the weeding of annual grasses may be left on site if the Project Biologist determines
that it will not affect the establishment of native seedlings. However, noxious weed debris shall be
disposed of off -site to avoid further introduction of undesirable exotic seed or propagules.
G. Erosion Control:
1 . Throughout the project installation, establishment and long-term maintenance periods, the
Contractor shall monitor for erosion within revegetation areas and shall prohibit gullies, rill and sheet
erosion, bare soil areas and silt deposition from occurring.
2. The Project Biologist shall prescribe erosion control procedures, at the expense of
the Owner, after evaluation of potential and existing erosion problems on a case -by -case basis.
3. Erosion control shall emphasize prevention. If needed, however, repair shall include
redirection or dissipation of the water source and recontouring of soil, followed by seeding,
mulching, or planting. In some cases, straw mulching (with weed -free straw) is sufficient to stabilize
the soil. Strategically placed and secured hay bales or sand bags may be used to dissipate water
sources.
1 4. If required, the Project Biologist shall prescribe seeding of eroded areas. The plant
palette and installation treatments employed in the restoration program shall dictate species
selection. The use of invasive exotic species for erosion control shall not be allowed.
5. Erosion control prescribed during the long term maintenance period will be the
responsibility of the Owner.
1. Replanting and Reseeding:
I . The Contractor shall procure replacement planting stock in advance to ensure that
replacement of dead container plants shall not be delayed during the plant establishment and
maintenance periods. Additional container plants shall be added if a bare spot of twenty-five square
feet or greater exists in the revegetation area following 120 days after planting and if the Project
Biologist determines it is necessary for erosion control purposes.
2. Any plants not achieving the success criteria of the CDFG and ACCE permits
following the long term maintenance period shall be removed and replaced by the Contractor. Plants
shall be replaced in kind, as specified in the plant palettes, or with appropriate replacement species
that have shown success in that specific area, as determined by the Project Biologist. Any species
substitutions shall require the approval of the Project Biologist.
9
R:\CIP\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway 1andscape\specs\Maintemnce Contruct.doc
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
3. If certain plant species are failing in an area, plant species substitutions might be
needed to achieve a greater success rate. No substitutions shall be made unless the owner and the
Project Biologist approve the species substitution to achieve a greater success rate. Approved plant
substitutions shall consist of only native plant material, and only local native genetic stock shall be
used.
PERFORMANCE STANDARDS FOR THE CREATION SITE DURING LONG-TERM
MAINTENANCE PERIOD
A. First Year Performance Standards:
1 . Seeded Plants: Sixty (60) percent cover of native seeded species within 120 days
after seeding.
2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree and shrub plantings. If 90
percent survival has not been achieved, replanting necessary to achieve this standard shall be
performed 120 days after planting.
3. If percent survival has not been achieved, replanting in -kind and/or re -seeding may
be required.
4. Listed exotic weed species shall account for less than five percent cover and no
mature specimens shall be present.,
B. Second Year Performance Standards:
1 . Seeded Plants: Coverage sufficient to prevent back erosion and flood damage,
recommended at sixty-five (65) percent.
2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80)
percent survival of all shrub plantings. If the percent survival has not been achieved, any replanting
necessary to achieve this standard shall be performed. If an acceptable growth rate in height has
not been achieved, the Project Biologist may recommend additional remediation measures.
3. Achieve at least five percent natural recruitment of native plants (either at least five
species present or five percent cover from volunteers). If this is not achieved, the Project Biologist
may require remedial grading to divert more floodwater on site to promote natural recruitment or not
re -seeding sparse cover areas.
4. Listed exotic weed species shall account for less than five percent cover and no
mature specimens shall be present.
C. Third Year Performance Standards:
1 . Seeded Plants: Coverage sufficient to prevent bank erosion and flood damage,
recommended at seventy (70) percent.
10
R:\C1PNPR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gateway landscape\specsWaintenance Contract.doc
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80)
percent survival of all shrub plantings. Seventy (70) percent cover of all tree and shrub plantings
including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these standards. All
one -gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least ten feet. All willow species
(excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least seven feet, and Salix exigua shall achieve
a height of at least four feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may
recommend additional fertilizer.
D. Fourth Year Performance Standards:
Seventy-five (75) percent coverage of hydroseeded groundcovers.
2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80)
percent survival of all shrub plantings. Seventy-five (75) percent cover of all tree and shrub
plantings including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these
standards. All one -gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least 13 feet. All willow
species (excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least nine feet, and Salix exigua shall
achieve a height of at least five feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may
recommend additional fertilizer.
E. Fifth Year Performance Standards:
Seeded Plants: Eighty (80) percent coverage.
2. Container Plants: Ninety (90) percent survival of all tree plantings and eighty (80)
percent survival of all shrub plantings. Eighty (80) percent cover of all tree and shrub plantings
including volunteers. Replanting shall be performed as necessary to achieve these standards. All
one -gallon cottonwood plantings shall achieve a height of at least 16 feet. All willow species
(excluding Salix exigua) shall achieve a height of at least 11 feet, and Salix exigua shall achieve a
height of at least six feet. If the minimum heights are not met, the Project Biologist may recommend
additional fertilizer.
11
R:\C1P\PR0JECTS\PW02\PW02-20 Gamway landscap6specsWaintemnee ContractAm
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORT
DEPARTMENTAL
REPORTS
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
A A
DIRECTOR OF FINANCE 4�:2�
CITY MANAGER W
�7j/
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/Ci , IT C 1/1
FROM: D - - - Qirector of Planning
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Monthly Report
The following are the recent highlights for the Planning Division of the Community Development
Department.
CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES
New Cases
The Division received 45 new applications for administrative, other minor cases, and home
occupations and 6 applG—tions for public hearings during the month of November. The new public
hearing cases are as follows:
DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 1
MINOR MODIFICATION 1
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 1
Status of Mamor Promects
New Promects
• Alvarez Del Rio Building — A Development Plan to construct, establish and operate a 17, 378
square foot office/warehouse building on 1.43 acres. The subject property is located on the east
side of Del Rio Road, south of Calle Cortez. A DRC meeting was held on November 18, 2004.
Staff is awaiting revised plans. (PA04-0543 — HARRIS)
• Rancho Baptist Church Monopine — A Conditional Use Permit application to construct an 80'
foot monopine antenna facility with shelter on the northwest corner of the Rancho Baptist
Church property, located at 29775 Santiago Road, APN 922-130-017. The application was
submitted on November 9, 2004. A DRC meeting is scheduled for December 16, 2004. (PA04-
0578 — PETERS)
R:W10NTHLY.RPTV004X1 1-2004 Reporl.doc
La Quinta Inn & Suites — A Pre -Application for a 98 unit facility used for lodging located on
Highway 79 South, east of La Paz Road. Comments are due December 8, 2004. (PR04-0019 —
DAMKO)
Roick Drive Business Condo — A Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a building into 20 units. The
project is located on the northeast corner of Via Industria & Roick Drive. (PA04-0588 —
DAMKO)
Recentiv ADDroved Proiects
• La-Z-Boy — A Development Plan to construct a 15,000 square foot building for La-Z-Boy on .94
acres at the NE corner of North General Kearney and Promenade Loop Road. (APN 910-130-
088). A DRC meeting was held August 5, 2004. The Planning Commission recommended
approval with conditions at its October 20, 2004 meeting. (PA04-0456 — PETERS)
• Temecula Creek Village —A zone change application to amend the text only of PDO-4 to change
the schedule of Permitted Uses to allow alcohol sales in conjunction with restaurants and gift
shops, located on the south side of Hwy 79 S. between Jedediah Smith Road and Avenida De
Missiones. The item was approved at the City Council meeting on November 9, 2004. (PA04-
384 — PAPP)
• Milgard Windows Addition —An Administrative Development Plan to construct an 8,775 square
foot office addition to Milgard Windows located at 26879 Diaz Rd. An ad hoc Planning
Commission sub -committee met with the applicant on September 15, 2004 to resolve design
issues. A letter was sent to the applicant on September 20, 2004. The project was
administratively approved October 18, 2004. (PA04-0479 — PETERS)
• Gallatin Parcel Map — A request to subdivide 2.89 acres into three lots with a minimum lot size of
.92 acres located on the northeast corner of Margarita Road and DePortola Road. Gallatin
Dental Group submitted the project on February 3,2004. The projectwentto DRC on March 11,
2004. The project was resubmitted on August 3, 2004. This project was approved by the
Planning Director on October 14, 2004. (PA04-0074 — LONG)
• Horton Continental — A Product Review for 100 single family residences including four floor
plans and four architectural styles. The project is in planning area 1 of Roripaugh Ranch
Specific Plan. The applicant submitted plans on Marchl, 2004 and submitted revised plans on
May 25, 2004. Staff sent out comments on July 9, 2004. The applicant resubmitted plans on
September 13, 2004. Staff is currently working on a staff report. The Planning Commission
approved this project November 3, 2004. (PA04-0133 — LONG)
Old Town Queen Anne Victorian — A Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to construct
a 11,000 square feet mixed use building to include retail uses (restaurant) on the ground floor
and office uses on the second floor on 1.93 acres, located at the northeast corner of Old Town
Front Street and Fourth Street. A DRC meeting was held on September 11, 2003. Revised
plans were submitted on March 1, 2004. The project was reviewed and recommended for
approval by the Old Town Local Review Board on April 12, 2004. Revised plans that were to
address Public Works comments were submitted on July 28, 2004, and on September 9, 2004.
The project was approved at the November 17, 2004 Planning Commission hearing. (PA03-
0"7 — FISK)
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
Projects Under Review
Commercial
Butterfield Square —A Development Plan to redevelop Butterfield Square in Old Town, resulting
in four two-story buildings totaling 22,048 square feet on 0.56 acres located on the southeast
corner of Old Town Front Street and Third Street. The Applicant submitted plans on March 31,
2004. A DRC meeting was held on June 10, 2004. A DRC letter was sent to the applicant on
July 13, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on September 29, 2004. The project was
presented to the Old Town Local Review Board on November 8, 2004. Staff has requested
conditions of approval from other departments, howeverthe Fire and Public Works Departments
have comments that need to be addressed before and conditions will be issued. The project is
anticipated to be scheduled forthe January 2005 Planning Commission hearing. (PA04-0231 —
FISK)
0 Temecula Town Center Modifications — A Major Modification to construct various fagade
renovations and parking lot modifications within the Temecula Town Center. Located on the
northeast corner of Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. The application was submitted on
September 23, 2004. Staff is awaiting additional signage information associated with the
proposed fagade improvements. (PA04-0530 — HARRIS)
Penfold Plaza —A Major Modification to a Development Plan to add a 1,900 sq. ft. dining area
and a 1,148 sq. ft. patio at the third story of an approved 18,000 sq. ft. building on 0.44 acres
located at 42072 Fifth Street. The application was submitted on December 1, 2004 and staff is
currently reviewing the application. (PA04-0592 — FISK)
Creekside Plaza Circle K/Unocal — An Administrative Development Plan to construct, establish
and operate a service station, self service car wash and retail store within the Creekside Plaza
Shopping Center. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of State Hwy 79 S.
and Pechanga Parkway. The application was submitted on March 31, 2004. The DRC meeting
was held on June 3, 2004. The applicant requested another meeting to further discuss plan
revisions. The meeting was held on June 16, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on June 17,2004.
Applicant resubmitted on August 6, 2004. Sent 3rd iteration of comments out on September 1,
2004. Applicant resubmitted on October 7, 2004. Staff sent 4th iteration of comments out on
November 9, 2004 waiting for applicant response; applicant is currently working with Public
Works to resolve access issues. (PA04 - 0232 — DAMKO)
Roripaugh Town Center — A Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Tentative
Parcel Map, Conditional Use Permit and a Development Plan to design and construct
approximately 171,200 square feet of commercial development, which include four majorteriant
buildings, six smaller freestanding buildings and inline shops on 20.2 acres. The project is
located on the northeast corner of Nicholas Road and Winchester Road. Matthew Fagan
Consulting Services submitted the application on July 24, 2003. A DRC meeting was held
September 4, 2003. The project was resubmitted on November 12, 2003. Staff has reviewed
the revised plans and at this time, the applicant has not complied with most of staffs initial
comments, including: site layout, elevations, and pedestrian circulation. A Planning
Commission subcommittee and Staff met with the applicant on March 29, 2004 to discuss the
project. Staff sent a letter to the applicant on April 6, 2004, summarizing the issue's raised at
the March 29, 2004 meeting. The applicant resubmitted plans on June 16, 2004. A DRC was
held on July 22, 2004. On October 20,2004 the Planning Commission made a recommendation
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
that the City Council approve the project. City Council approved this item on November 23,
2004. (PA02-0364 —LONG)
St. Thomas Episcopal Church — A Development Plan /Conditional Use Permit for a 16,983
square foot sanctuary and a 12,768 square foot parish hall with day care on 3.74 acres, located
at 29132 Avendia de Missiones. This application was submitted on June 4, 2004. A DRC
meeting was held on August 12, 2004. The applicant has been discussing revised Concept
plans with staff since August 12, 2004. Staff is currently awaiting submittal of revised plans.
(PA04-0394 — FISK)
Penny Dome Office Building — a Development Plan to construct a 5,296 square foot office
building on 0. 18 acres located at 41888 0 street. This application was submitted on August 11,
2004. A DRC meeting was held on September 9, 2004 and a DRC letter was sent to the
applicant on September 13, 2004. The project went before the Old Town Local Review Board
on September 13, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on October 7, 2004. A second DRC
letter was sent to the applicant on November 3, 2004. Revised plans were received on
November 29, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the revised plans. (PA04-0498 — FISK)
• Moreno Road Office Building - A Development Plan to construct a two — story 7,000 square foot
office building on.76 acres, located at41919 Moreno Road. The application was submitted on
July 12, 2004. Staff provided a DRC comment letter to the applicant on August 23, 2004 and
continues to await plan revisions. (PA04-0470 — HARRIS)
• Pauba Road Offices — A Development Plan to construct 2 two story office buildings totaling
18,237 square feet located at Pauba Road and Margarita Road. The office buildings will be
used for retail and office space. A DRC meeting was held on October 7, 2004. A DRC letter
was sent October 12, 2004. The applicant is currently meeting with neighbors to discuss site
design. (PA04-0476 — DAMKO)
• Temecula Corporate Center —A Pre -application for a mixed -use business park was submitted
on October 5, 2004, consisting of 17 office, "flextech", and industrial buildings on two parcels
(6.19 and 6.23 acres) on the east and west sides of Via Industria. The application was
submitted October 5, 2004 and a DRC was held November 4, 2004. Staff is waiting for the
formal submittal of a Development Plan application. (PR04-0017 — PETERS)
• Vantage Oncology — A Minor Modification to an existing Development Plan was submitted on
September 27, 2004 to add a 1,250 square foot addition to the Redhawk Medical Center at the
southeast corner of George Cushman Court and Highway 79 South. The application was
submitted September 27, 2004, and a DRC meeting was held October 28, 2004. Staff is
currently waiting for response.(PA04-0535 — PETERS)
• Calle Cortez — A Development Plan application was submitted on October 1, 2004 to construct
two concrete tilt -up service commercial buildings. Building 1 is 16,954 square feet and building
2 is 15,432 square feet. The project is located on the north side of Calle Cortez, just west of
Jefferson. DRC was held on November 18, 2004. Staff is waiting for resubmittal. (PA04-0544
— DAMKO)
• El Torito — A Development Plan to construct and operate a 7,380 square foot restaurant on 0.42
acres located at 40517 Margarita Road (Power Center 11). The application was submitted on
October 25, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on December 2, 2004 and a DRC letter was sent to
the applicant on December 2, 2004. Staff is currently awaiting the submittal of revised plans.
(PA04-0561 — FISK)
R:\M0NTHLY.RPT%2004%11-2004 Report.doc
• Margarita Crossing — A Development Plan to construct a 37,173 square foot mixed use retail
restaurant center on 5.56 acres located at the northwest corner of Margarita Road and Nicole
Lane. The application was submitted on October 28, 2004. A DRC meeting is scheduled for
December9,2004. (PA04-0563— FISK)
• Ruby's Restaurant — A Major Modification to include exterior material and color changes to
convert an existing Coco's Restaurant to a Ruby's Diner at 26495 Ynez Road. The application is
scheduled for the December 15, 2004 Planning Commission meeting. (PA04-0550 — PETERS)
• Orchard Christian Fellowship — A Minor Modification to a 7,832 square foot assembly building to
change windows and doors on two sides of the building, and add new steps and landscape
planter. The application was submitted on October 18, 2004. A DRC meeting was held
November 18, 2004. (APN 921-310-004) (PA04-0552 — PETERS)
• Temecula Education Complex —A Development Plan and PDO forthe construction of a 144,000
sq. ft. education complex, a 10,000 sq. ft. Research and Development and conference center,
16,000 sq. ft. day care facility, 48,000 sq. ft. of retail space, a two story parking structure and
288 apartment units on 40 acres located at the northwest corner of Diaz Road and Dendy
Parkway. The application was submitted on November 17, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing
the application. (PA04-0682 — FISK)
Subdivisions
Seraphina Tract Map 32346 — A request to subdivide 28.6 acres into 67 lots with a minimum lot
size of 7,200 square feet located on the north side of Nicolas Road. The project was submitted
on March 16, 2004. The DRC letter was sent on April 20, 2004. The applicant submitted a draft
development plan via email for staff s review on June 2, 2004. Staff reviewed draft development
plan and sent comments via email on June 15, 2004. Staff met with applicant regarding
additional issues in August. The applicant resubmitted on September 20,2004. Staffsentthird
iteration letter on October 14, 2004. Waiting for applicant response, and currently working on
the Initial Study. (PA04-0178 — DAMKO)
PM 28049 EOT —A fourth Extension of Time for Parcel Map 28049 (A proposed multi -family
residential development. The subject property is located at the northwest corner of Pujol Street
and Calle Carrillo. The application was submitted on September 30, 2004. Staff is awaiting an
environmental study to address MSCHP requirements. (PA04-0539 — HARRIS)
Wolf Creek PA 16 — A Tentative Subdivision Map to subdivide 4.22 acres into 6 custom hillside
lots averaging 30,000 square feet. The application was submitted on May 19, 2004 and a DRC
meeting was held on July 1, 2004. A DRC letter was mailed to the applicant on July 6, 2004.
The project was resubmitted on November 2, 2004 and staff is currently reviewing the revised
plans. (PA04-0368ITTM 32319 — KITZEROW)
Industrial
Roick/Regency Industrial Building —A Development Plan to construct an industrial building with
four suites totaling 12,407 square feet on 1.87 acres on the southwest corner of Roick Drive and
Winchester Road. James E. Horeca submitted the application for Regency, Inc, on July 1,
2003. A pre-DRC meeting was held on July 22, 2003. A DRC meeting was held on July 31,
2003 with the applicant. Staff was informed by the applicant on December 29, 2003 that there
has been a change in architects. Applicant resubmitted on March 11, 2004, but the submittal
RAMONTHLY.RPTU004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
package did not include revised landscape plans. Applicant was advised but has not yet
submitted landscape plans. Letter was mailed to applicant on June 4, 2004 to extend
application processing 6 months. New architect is working on revising plans. (PA03-0359 —
KITZEROW)
Temecula Industrial Park —A Development Plan to construct thirteen single -story office buildings
totaling 56,900 square feet on 4.83 acres located on the west side of Business Park Drive,
between Rancho Way and Rancho California Road, approximately 1,000 feet north of Rancho
California Road. Scott Barone (Lot 11 BPD LLC) submitted the application on December 23,
2003. A DRC Meeting with the applicant was held on January 29, 2004. A DRC letter was sent
to the applicant on February 2, 2004. The applicant submitted revised site plans on March 29,
2004, and again on April 28, 2004. A DRC was held July 15, 2004. Staff is reviewing revised
plans submitted on September 9, 2004. A DRC meeting was held September 30, 2004. Staff is
reviewing revised plans submitted November 12, 2004. (PA03-0728 — PETERS)
Kearny Commerce Center — A Development Plan to construct an 86,175 square foot light
industrial building on 5.55 acres located on the north side of Remington Avenue. Project was
submitted on May 25, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on June 22, 2004. The DRC letter was
sent June 23, 2004. The applicant resubmitted in July without fully addressing staffs comments.
The second iteration letter was sent out on August 6, 2004. Planning Commission hearing date
is scheduled for December 15, 2004. (PA04-0361 — DAMKO)
Temecula Corporate Heights — Applicant is requesting a sign program for a multi -tenant
industrial building at 42301 Zevo Drive, just west of Diaz Road. The DRC letter was sent on May
6, 2004. Applicant submitted on May 22 ' 2004. Sent 2 nd iteration letter on June 8, 2004. The
applicant resubmitted on June 29, 2004. Staff sent 3 nd iteration comment letter on August 4,
2004. Applicant submitted on September 7, 2004. Staff sent 4th Iteration comment letter on
November 18, 2004. (PA04-0198 — DAMKO)
CBC Business Center — A Development Plan to construct two multi -tenant industrial buildings
(Building A — 75,697 SF / Building B -56,193 SF) on 8.59 acres located on the north side of
Remington Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet east of Winchester Road. The applicant
submitted plans on March 1, 2004. A DRC meeting took place on May 20, 2004. A letter was
mailed to the applicant on May 20, 2004. The application was resubmitted on June 28,2004 and
a letter requesting revisions was mailed to applicant on July 27, 2004. The application was
resubmitted on August 23, 2004. Comments from other departments were due September 7,
2004. Clearance from the county geologist was received in late November. This item is
tentatively scheduled for Planning Commission on January 5,2005. (PA04-0134—KITZEROW)
Park Place Office: - A Development Plan to construct a 20,416 SF office building located at the
southwest corner of Diaz Road. & Winchester Road. The applicant submitted plans on July 14,
2004. A Pre-DRC meeting was held on August 10, 2004A DRC letter was mailed to the
applicant on August 12, 2004. Revised plans were submitted on September 21, 2004. This
item is tentatively scheduled for the December 15, 2004 Planning Commission and will require
council review. (PA04-0134 — KITZEROW)
Waste Pointe Business Center —A Development Plan to construct 14 separate office buildings
totaling 50,000 square feet set in a campus setting. The proposed buildings are located on the
corner of Roick Road and Via Industria. A DRC meeting was held on September 29, 2004.
Applicant resubmitted on November4,2004. A Planning Commission hearing date is scheduled
for December 15, 2004. (PA04-0612 — DAMKO)
RAMONTHLY.RPMODC1 1-2004 Report.doc
Mixed Use
Residential
Naron Pacific Tentative Tract Map 30434 — A proposal for a zone change from L-1 to L-2 on
31.93 acres and Tentative Tract Map to create 30 residential lots and 4 open space lots in the
Chaparral area. The applicant has provided all materials, but is now proposing a PDO for the
project. The CAC has made a recommendation on policy for the Chaparral Area allowing 1/2-
acre lots if it does not increase the "net" density. A PDO was submitted on March 25, 2004.
Staff met with applicant in April to discuss grading issues and begin preparation of an Initial
Study. As of November 12, 2004 the applicant has not yet submitted a revised constraint map.
(PA02-0204 — PAPP)
Tierra Vista Condominiums — An Administrative Development Plan to construct 23 residential
condominiums on 1.5 acres. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Tierra
Vista Road and Ynez Road. The application was submitted on September 30, 2003. A DRC
meeting was held on November 6, 2003. Revised plans were submitted on July 7, 2004. A
second DRC letter was provided on September 10, 2004. Staff is awaiting plan revisions.
(PA03-0662 — HARRIS)
Del Val Second Dwelling Unit —An application for a second dwelling was received January 23,
2004 for a 768 square foot mobile unit at 31050 Nicolas Road at Leifer Road. A pre-DRC
Meeting was held on March 9, 2004. A DRC meeting was held August 5, 2004. Waiting for
applicant response. (PA04-0039 — PETERS)
Estero Street — A request for a Zone Change (from L-1 to L-2) and a Tentative Parcel Map to
subdivide a 1.39 acre parcel into two parcels for single family homes. The project is located at
the end of Estero Street. The applications were filed on April 19, 2004. A DRC meeting was
held on July 8, 2004. Staff is awaiting submittal of revised plans. (PA04 -0283 and PA04-0275
—PETERS)
Temecula Ridge Apartments — A Development Plan for the addition of 20 units by adding a 3 rd
story to five buildings in a previously approved 220 unit apartment project. The site is located on
the south side of Rancho California Road, southeast of the intersection of Rancho California
Road and Moraga Road. The application was submitted on April 13,2004. A DRC meeting was
held on June 10, 2004, and a letter was mailed to the applicant on June 14, 2004. Plans were
resubmitted on October 12, 2004. This project was presented at November 17, Planning
Commission meeting with a denial recommendation from staff. The Planning Commission
continued the item to December 15, 2004 to have findings and conditions of approval prepared.
(PA04-0260 — KITZEROW)
Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment - A Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), Tentative
Tract Map and Zone Change PA04-0369, 0370, 0371. A request to change OS to LM and a
tentative tract map to add 6 residential lots. SPA addresses fuel modification issues, general
clean-up items such as fencing and inconsistencies. Staff sent a letter outlining concerns on
June 28, 2004. The SPA was resubmitted on September 1, 2004. Staff sent out a correction
letter on October 11, 2004. The project was resubmitted on October 29, 2004. This project is
scheduled for Planning Commission hearing on December 15,2004. (PA04-0369,0370,0371 —
LONG)
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
• Saratoga Ridge —A Product Review for 10 detached single family residences which offer 2 floor
plans, and 3 architectural styles. The project is located off Rancho Vista Road and Greentree.
It was submitted on July 28, 2004. Sent comment letter to applicant on August 30, 2004. The
applicant resubmitted on October 7, 2004. A Director's Hearing is scheduled for December 1,
2004. (PA04-0488 — DAMKO)
• Temecula Lane — A Conditional Use Permit, Development Plan and Vesting Tentative Tract Map
to construct 59 4-plex: buildings totaling 236 units, 32 3-plex: buildings totaling 96 units and 96
single-family detached units on a 47.5 acre site located at the northeast corner of Loma Linda
Road and Temecula Lane. A DIRC meeting was held with the applicant on October 21, 2004.
Staff is awaiting plan revisions. (PA04-0496 — HARRIS)
Miscellaneous
• Sprint 100 Margarita — A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the co -location of six (6) cellular
telecommunication antennas on a mono -pine, which includes the replacement of the existing 57
foot high mono -pine with a 68'4 ft mono -pine. Located at 41520 Margarita Road. The
application was submitted on September 23, 2004. A DRC letter was sent to the applicant on
October 19, 2004 and staff is currently awaiting revised plans. (PA04-0529 — FISK)
• Faith Bible Church — A Minor Conditional Use Permit to establish a church facility at 42257
Avenida Alvarado. Project was submitted on April 13, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on May
20, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for revised plans. No change as of December 3, 2004.
(PA04-0266 — LONG)
• Cingular Mono -Pine Wireless Antenna — A Conditional Use Permit to construct a 50' high
monopine on Greentree Road, approximately 500'east of Via Sierra. Project was submitted on
April 19, 2004. Staff sent a DRC letter on June 8, 2004. The applicant resubmitted plans on
September 23, 2004. Staff is in the process of contracting with a third party for review of the
project. (PA04-0225 — FISK)
• AT&T and Verizon Wireless — A Conditional Use Permit/Development Plan to construct, operate
and establish an unmanned wireless communication facility consisting of up to eight ±48' high
"Italian Cypress" trees stealth antennas and an 8'x1 2' equipment area, located at the Rancho
California Water District Water Reservoir Complex, east of Meadows Parkway. Staff has
received phone calls from the surrounding residents expressing concerns about this proposal.
The project was scheduled for the October 15,2003 Planning Commission Hearing with a denial
recommendation, however, the meeting was canceled and the project will be renoticed for a
future Planning Commission Hearing. Staff met with the applicant on March 12, 2004, to
discuss design alternatives. As of November12, 2004, the applicant has not resubmitted.
(PA02-0335 — PAPP)
Rancho Medical Group Sports Facility — A Conditional Use Permit for a recreation facility (for
physical therapy and public use) in an existing 76,886 square foot building in the LI Zone located
at 28780 Single Oak Drive. Proposal includes volleyball courts, basketball courts, martial arts
studio and exercise equipment. The project was submitted on August 5, 2004. A DRC meeting
was held on September 9, 2004. A DRC letter was sent on September 10, 2004. The project
was resubmitted on September 14, 2004 and a second DRC letter was sent to the applicant on
October 1, 2004. The project was resubmitted on October 27, 2004. This item is scheduled for
Director's Hearing on December 9, 2004. (PA04-0493 — KITZEROW)
RAM0NTHLY.RPT%2004N1 1-2004 Report.doc
Meadowview Golf Course — Conditional Use Permit and Development Plan to design and
construct a public golf course and driving range within the Meadowview Community. The
Focused EIR requires modification. Staff provided an EIR comment letter to applicant the week
of June 7, 2004. Staff is currently waiting for the revised EIR. (PA01 -0375 — PETERS)
Verizon Wireless Telecommunication — A Conditional Use Permit for a 60-foot high mono -pine
within the Rancho California Water District Headquarters facility. Staff has informed the
applicant that the proposed mono -pole is not an acceptable design for the area. The applicant
indicated alternative sites would not be feasible; however, on November 10, 2003, they offered
to look at alternative sites and designs. The applicant resubmitted on May 10, 2004. Staff met
with the applicant on August 19, 2004 to discuss design alternatives. The applicant is
continuing to cooperate with staff to deveiop an agreeable design solution. On September 16,
2004 the applicant submitted design concepts that were not supported by staff. There has been
no formal resubmiffal since May 10, 2004. (PA02-0637 — PAPP)
Cyberzone — A Minor Conditional Use Permit for the establishment and operation of an Internet
business to rent computer times for Internet and Microsoft applications within an existing suite of
the Promenade Mail. Staff has received conditions of approval from other departments and
scheduled the project for the April 7, 2004 Planning Commission Hearing The applicant lost
their lease prior to the hearing, so the application has been continued off calendar in anticipation
of another lease space becoming available within the mail. (PRJOO-906 — FISK)
Temecula Regional Hospital: A General Plan Amendment, Conditional Use Permit and
Development Plan to construct a fitness center, cancer center, two medical/office buildings (4
stories each) and a six story hospital structure all totaling approximately 535,000 square feet,
located north of Highway 79 S, south of De Portola and west of Margarita Road. Project was
submitted June 30, 2004. A DRC was held on August 18, 2004. Staff and the City Council
subcommittee have met with the applicant twice. The applicant submitted revised plans and a
Tentative Parcel Map (PA04-0571) on November 4,2004. Staff is currently reviewing the plans.
As of December 2, 2004 staff is waiting for revised environmental documents. (PA04-0462,
0463 — LONG)
Verizon Wireless Telecommunication — A one year extension of time for a previously approved
Minor conditional Use Permit (PA01-0019) to co -locate 3 antenna array panels on an existing
monopine structure located at the RCWD tank in Chardonnay Hills, 31008 Rancho California
Road. A Director Hearing was held on September 9, 2004 where it was re -directed to Planning
Commission due to environmental concerns expressed by neighboring property owners. An
Initial Study is being prepared to consider aesthetic impacts. The applicant has been notified
that a Negative Declaration will be prepared. This item has not yet been scheduled for Planning
Commission. (PA04-0264 — PAPP)
Concordia University — A CUP to allow an education facility within an existing building in the LI
Zone, located at 28780 Single Oak Drive. This application was received on October 29, 2004.
Staff is currently reviewing plans and a Pre-DRC was held on November 23, 2004. A DRC letter
was mailed on November 24, 2004 and this item is tentatively scheduled for the December 30,
2004 Director's Hearing. (PA04-0565 — KITZEROW)
Nextel at Bennett —A Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a
cellular telecommunications facility consisting of six antennas (total) on two light poles and 11.5"
x 20" equipment building on 12 acres located at 32240 Highway 79 South. The application was
submitted on November 1, 2004. Staff is in the process of contracting with a third party for
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Reporl.doc
review of the project and will hold a DRC meeting with the applicant upon completion of the third
party review. (PA04-0566 —FISK)
Dalton Historic Building — A sign program for an approved 17, 334 square foot three-story
office/retail building located at the northwest corner of Mercedes Street and Fifth Street. The
application was submitted on November 4, 2004. Staff sent a comment letter to the applicant
requesting revisions to the sign program on November 19, 2004 and is currently awaiting the
submittal of a revised plan sign program. (PA03-0711 — FISK)
Small Business Assistance
La Tacqueria —Staff is working with the owners of this Old Town business on a revised plan for
an exterior fagade improvement that includes new awnings, paint and signs. A proposal from
the contractor is to be submitted to the Planning Department in December.
Rachel's Place — Staff is working with this new business in order to help them obtain funding for
new signs under the Fagade Improvement Program.
The Trick Shop — Staff has helped this Old Town business obtain approval for her signs that
were approved by the Old Town Local Review Board at their November meeting.
Temecula Psychic —Staff is working with this established Old Town business owner to help him
obtain approval for his proposed signs and ensure compliance with the sign program for the
Temecula Stage Stop.
Special Event Permits
2005 Good Old Days Car Show: Staff is helping applicant with their temporary use and special
event permits. This event will take place on February 26, and 27, 2005 in Old Town Temecula.
An initial organizational meeting has been held with the applicant and involved City departments.
Erle Stanley Gardner Mystery Weekend: This event took place November 6 and 7 in Old Town
Temecula. Staff aided the Redevelopment Department in expediting the approval of a
temporary use permit for this activity.
Special Pro*ects & Long Range Plannina Activities
The Division also commits work efforts toward larger scale and longer time frame projects for both
private and public purposes. These activities can range from a relatively simple ordinance or
environmental review to a new specific plan or a general plan amendment. Some of the major
special projects and long range planning activities are as follows:
Comprehensive General Plan Update — Staff anticipates completing their review of the
Screencheck Draft of the EIR by the first week of December. Staff anticipates releasing the
Draft EIR for public comment in January. (HOGAN)
Public Transportation Master Plan —Staff has been researching how these issues have been
addressed by other jurisdictions. Current efforts focus on park-n-ride facilities. (WEST)
Santa Margarita River Watershed Planning Project - Staff members from the Planning and
Public Works Departments are participating in the process to ensure that the results and
RAMONTHLY.RPMOM1 1-2004 Report.doc
10
recommendations are based upon good information, appropriate science, and that the interests
of local residents are protected. Comments on the revised draft of the watershed assessment
report were provided on November 9, 2004. Staff is currently reviewing the draft Watershed
Management Plan. (HOGAN)
• Automobile Dealership Signage and Special Events — Staff is preparing a recommendation for
weekend events and signage issues based on the information proposal received from
Automobile Dealership Association.
• Staff has prepared a final draft ordinance to codify use restrictions and supplemental standards
for "Cyber Caf6s." The final draft was routed to the City Attorney on September 15, 2004. This
item has not yet been scheduled for public hearing. (PAPP)
• Roripaugh Estates Specific Plan Amendment — Staff is proposing to amend the Roripaugh
Estates Specific Plan to resolve commercial zoning issues and existing land uses adjacent to
Planning Area 8. (PA97-0443 — WEST)
• Paloma Del Sol Specific Plan, Amendment 8.1 and Supplemental EIR — Staff is waiting for the
applicant to submit a revised project schedule and the draft of the Specific Plan and
Supplemental EIR. (PA03-0402,0403 —WEST)
• Telecommunications Facilities — Staff reviewed the proposals and selected two firms for
interview on December 15, 2004. Staff anticipates bring forward a contract to City Council in
February. (WEST)
• Supplemental Development Standards (Alcohol Sales) — Staff and the City Attorney are
developing additional performance standards. The tentative schedule has a proposed
ordinance amendment going to the Planning Commission in January 2005. (HOGAN)
• Hillside Development Policy — The policies are being examined for integration into the draft -
grading ordinance. Staff is working with GIS to analyze topography, soil types, environmental
(habitat), and other constraints. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
• Procedures to Implement CEQA — Staff initiated project to develop local guidelines and
procedure manual for processing CEQA documents, including the adoption of local exemptions.
The process will also conform to the new CEQA Guidelines, and will create new templates for
standard CEQA forms. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
• Surface Mining Ordinance — The staff and City Attorney had been making final changes based
upon feedback from the State prior to submitting this item to the Council for their consideration.
This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
• Traditional Neighborhood Development Ordinance — Final changes are being made prior to
scheduling this item for a Planning Commission workshop. This item is on hold pending
additional staff resources.
• South Side Street Improvement Project — The former South Side Specific Plan is being modified
to design guidelines and a street improvement program for Old Town Front Street between First
Street and Highway 79 South. This item is on hold pending additional staff resources.
R:WONTHLY.RPM004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
11
• Update of the Citywide Design Guidelines - Staff has completed its review of the Guidelines and
has provided a comprehensive set of comments to the consultant assisting in this effort. The
consultant will require two to three weeks to respond to staff comments and prepare a Final
Draft. A presentation to Planning Commission is tentatively scheduled for mid -December 2004.
(PAPP)
• Margarita Village Specific Plan Amendment. —A minor amendment was resubmitted to facilitate
HOA ownership of the pool, tennis courts and tot lot. This item is scheduled for the Planning
Commission on December 1, 2004. (PA04-0486 — WEST)
• AQMD Air Quality Element Guidelines — Staff is reviewing the draft to see how the previous
comments were addressed.
* City — Project environmental reviews and permitting:
o Overland Drive Extension — Staff reviewed 2nd submittal of the draft initial study / Mitigated
Negative Declaration and has provided comments to Public Works. No resubmittalto date.
Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping Project — Request from Public Works for
Environmental Determination for this project. Previous Negative Declaration has been
modified because the project description has changed. The revised N.D. has been routed to
Redevelopment, TCSD, and Public Works for comments. Planning has not received
comments. Planning will coordinate with Public Works to schedule this item for City Council.
(EA-93 — PAPP)
Diaz Road General Plan Level Improvements — Staff has prepared an initial study to
determine the impacts of constructing ultimate improvements on Diaz Road. The initial
study will need to be revised because of recent improvements at the intersection of Diaz
Road and Rancho Way. Staff recommends that a Negative Declaration be prepared.
Planning will coordinate with Public Works to schedule this item for City Council. (EA1107—
PAPP)
o 1-15 / SR79 S. Ultimate Interchange Project — Staff has provided comments to the Public
Works Department on the issues that need to be addressed in the NEPA/CEQA document
that is to be prepared for this project. (EA1 11 — WEST)
Mercedes Street Interim Parking Lots — Staff has reviewed the proposed project and
determined that a Categorical Exemption will meet the requirements of CEQA. (EA -I IS
HOGAN)
General Plan Amendments
PA03-0178 TERC 52, LLC — A General Plan amendment application (and Zone Change PA03-
0177) to change the land use designation on 52.83 acres from Business Park to High Density
Residential at the northwest corner of the Rancho California Business park, adjacent to the
Campus project. Staff is awaiting the submittal of additional information and has advised the
applicant that the proposal will not go to hearing until the Comprehensive General Plan Update
is complete. (PAPP)
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
12
Margarita Village General Plan Amendment — (PA04-0391) and Specific Plan Amendment
(PA04-0390) to change the land use designation from VL (very -low -.2 to.4 du/acre) residential
to LM (low medium — 3 to 6 du/ac) for 18.3 acres along the west side of Butterfield Stage road,
north of Chemin Clinet. This is associated with a Tentative Tract Map (PA04-0392) for 36
residential lots ranging in size from 7,200 to 25,000 SF
These applications were submitted on June 2, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on July 8, 2004.
The project was resubmitted on August 2, 2004 and a DRC letter was sent to the applicant on
August 26, 2004. Staff is currently reviewing revised plans submitted on October 4, 2004.
(KITZEROW)
PA04-041 1, Nicolas 73 — A General Plan Amendment application (and Zone Change PA04-
0414, and TTM PA04-0415) to change the land use designation on 73 acres from very low
density Residential to L-1 at the southeast corner of Nicolas Road and Via Lobo. Pre-DRC was
held on July 8, 2004 and DRC was held on July 15, 2004. Based upon issues raised at DRC
and clarified in a follow-up letterthe applicant was informed that staff does not supportthe GPA.
Issues related to the overall project density and number of lots proposed on the map will require
a resubmittal. The proposal will not go to Public Hearing prior to the adoption of the
Comprehensive General Plan update. (PAPP)
RAMONTHLY.RPT\2004\1 1-2004 Report.doc
13
APPROVAL
CITY ATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FIN)
CITY MANAGER I
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: Jim Domenoe, Chief of Police
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Monthly Departmental Report
The following report reflects special teams, traffic enforcement and miscellaneous activity occurring
during November 2004. The Police Department responded to 53 "priority one" calls for service
during the month of November, with an average responsetime of approximately 5.9 minutes. Atotal
of 4,402 calls for police service were generated in the City of Temecula during the month.
During November, the Temecula Police Department's Old Town Storefront served a total of 248
customers. Fifty-five sets of fingerprints were taken, 40 people filed police reports and 13 people
had citations signed off. Crime Prevention Officer Lynn Fanene participated in a number of special
events, neighborhood watch and community -oriented programs during the month. He also
coordinated requests for patrol ride-alongs and conducted police station tours. Additionally, he
continued to provide residential and business security surveys/visits and past crime follow-up.
Officer Fanene also continued to process City Planning Department submissions of site
plans/conditions.
During November, the POP Teams continued their problem oriented policing approach of areas
within the community and made six felony and five misdemeanor arrests for various crimes. The
function of the POP Teams is to address situations that typically require extended enforcement
action or certain expertise in order to solve an on -going problem within a neighborhood. The POP
Teams also wrote five citations during the month. Additionally, the POP Team was responsible for
conducting nightly surveillance in the business districts of Temecula. Members of the POP Team
also began establishing gang database information by identifying and interviewing suspected street
gang members in Temecula.
The traffic team reported that during the month of November there were 748 citations issued for
hazardous violations, 53 citations were issued for non -hazardous violations and 163 parking
citations were issued. During the month there were six injury traffic collisions, 39 non -injury
collisions were reported and 21 drivers were arrested for DUI. In other citation summary
information, the Neighborhood Enforcement Team (NET) program resulted in 95 citations being
issued. This program addresses traffic concerns in residential neighborhoods with a dedicated
motor officer. The SLAP (Stop Light Abuse Program) resulted in at least 317 citations being issued.
Monthly Departmental Report — Police Department
During the month of November, the POP officers assigned to the Promenade Mall handled a total of
51 calls for service. The majority of these calls were for shoplifting investigations. During the
month, calls and on -sight activity resulted in the criminal arrest and filings on two felony and six
misdemeanor cases. Officers Joyner and Rahn continued to provide training to security staff during
the month. The mall off icers continued to work to prevent vehicle theft and vehicle burglaries. There
were five vehicle thefts and no vehicle burglaries reported during the month of November at the
mall.
Ourfive school resource officers have remained active during November, with the beginning of the
school year. The school resource officers conducted many counseling sessions with students. A
total of 60 investigations/reports were conducted/written by the school resource officers during
November. The school resource officers made several felony arrests for burglary and possession of
a dangerous weapon on campus. They also made misdemeanor arrests possession of marijuana
and theft.
The YAT program (Youth Accountability Team) continues to be a success in part through its Youth
Court program. The YAT officer assisted at other schools when needed and conducted follow-ups
with parents of juveniles in the program. Officer Medeiros also worked with "at risk" juveniles
throughout the month and also conducted counseling sessions with their parents. Sheassistedthe
Riverside County District Attorney's Office and Probation Department by providing training during
home visits with incorrigible/at risk juveniles during the month of November. Officer Medeiros is
currently carrying a caseload of about 30 at -risk juveniles. While it is difficult to quantify her
activities, the service Officer Medeiros provides in helping steer young people in the community
away from criminal activity is invaluable.
During the month of November, the Special Enforcement Team (SET Team), consisting of Off icers
Jeff Fisher and James Kaffka, continued their narcotic enforcement efforts. Officers Fisher and
Kaffka made six felony and two misdemeanor arrests for various crimes, including narcotic
violations. Officers also recovered quantities of methamphetamine during the month. The SET
officers wrote and executed a search warrantfor methamphetamine during the month of November.
Volunteers from the community continue to be an integral partof theTemecula Police Department's
staff. Under the guidance of volunteer coordinator Officer Lori Callahan and assistant coordinator
Gayle Gerrish, the Police Department's volunteer staff contributed 297 hours of service in
November. Volunteer assignments include computer data input, logistics support, special event
assistance and telephone answering duties.
CommunityAction Patrol (CAP) Program volunteers have continued their activities, patrollingthe city
for graffiti, conducting vacation residential checks and assisting patrol with special logistical needs
and special events. Other duties these volunteers attend to are business checks and abandoned
vehicles and traffic control. The goal of the program is high visibility, which prevents crime from
occurring. CAP Team members contributed 115 hours of service to the community during the
month of November.
The reserve officer program and mounted posse are additional valuable volunteer resources
available to the police department. The police department utilizes reserve officers to assist with
patrol, traffic enforcement, crime prevention and a variety of special functions. Reserve police
officers worked a total of 43 hours specifically on patrol in Temecula during November.
Monthly Departmental Report — Police Department
The Temecula Citizen Corps Program continued to make good progress during the month of
November. The executive body, or the TCC Council, continued to hold their bi-weekly meetings at
Station 84. There are many indications that TCC will continue to grow and prosper within the
community as the program is introduced to the PTA organization and new volunteers are signed up.
Monthly Departmental Report — Police Department
APPROVAL
CITYATTORNEY
DIRECTOR OF FINAl'
CITY MANAGER e--�
CITY OF TEMECULA
AGENDA REPORT
TO: City Manager/City Council
FROM: William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
DATE: December 14, 2004
SUBJECT: Department of Public Works Monthly Activity Report
RECOMMENDATION: Attached for City Council's review and filing is the Department of
Public Works' Monthly Activity Reports for the month of November, 2004.
MOACTRPT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer
FROM: Brad Baron, Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: December 3, 2004
SUBJECT: Monthly Activity Report - November, 2004
The following activities were performed by Public Works Department, Street Maintenance Division in-house personnel
for the month of November, 2004:
1. SIGNS
A. Total signs replaced 34
B. Total signs installed 20
C. Total signs repaired 70
11. TREES
A. Total trees trimmed for sight distance and street sweeping concerns 4
Ill. ASPHALT REPAIRS
A. Total square feet of A. C. repairs 3,249
B. Total Tons 55
IV. CATCH BASINS
A. Total catch basins cleaned 258
V. RIGHT-OF-WAY WEED ABATEMENT
A. Total square footage for right-of-way abatement 0
VI. GRAFFITI REMOVAL
A. Total locations 17
B. Total S.F. 2,347
VII. STENCILING
A. 6 New and repainted legends
B. 0 L.F. of new and repainted red curb and striping
Also, City Maintenance staff responded to 38 service order requests ranging from weed abatement, tree trimming,
sign repair, A.C. failures, litter removal, and catch basin cleanings. This is compared to 90 service order requests
for the month of October, 2004.
The Maintenance Crew has also put in 142 hours of overtime which includes standby time, special events and
response to street emergencies.
The total cost for Street Maintenance performed by Contractors for the month of November, 2004 was $ 78,690.00
compared to $ 71,098.00 for the month of October, 2004.
Account No. 5402
Account No. 5401
Account No. 999-5402
$ 2,100.00
$75,630.00
$ 960.00
cc: Ron Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works
Ali Moghadam, Senior Engineer - (Traffic)
Greg Butler, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Amer Attar, Senior Engineer - (Capital Improvements)
Jerry Alegria, Senior Engineer - (Land Development)
2
E
OA
4 ou
co
m
0 LU
Q >
w
0
a;
U)
E
0 0
0 co a.
0,
M UJ
00
U
a
LU
0 0
CL
2 ul
M
o
o
ci 6
0 Z
0
LU
LU
�
0 w
CL 0
o C2L
LU Z
Z
ZQ
o
ci
LU cla
�- m
IL z R
w
m
0
00
LL P La
0 0
0 v
c;
Z
LU LU L)
0 0
LU U)
0
W
z �-
900)
w
w V
y I..
W LU
0
0
0
IL 0
W � 0
w
ir
w
w
LU
w
0
cr
0)
u
0)
0
0
LU
z
0
M
Q
a; c6
21
ci ui
� w
0
LU
IL
LU
Of
a)
z
2
U)
0,
c; oi
a m
C; cli
L
0
0
C6
m �
16 c;
m 0
m C�
v 0
v
w
0
LU U)
a
m
0 0
w x
L) w
> W
w
to
z
LU
LU
LU
d
d
0
z
9
0 z
.0
m m
M
E
0
LU
U) �-
Y LU
w �j m
0 CL
0
L)
0
IL
w
0 w >-
F- 0 0
Z�u
LU Z 0)
2 Lu j-
F- �- L
z
CL
LLI
0
ul
LU
coo
7
N
ci
C6
coo
0
0-
LO
N N
9
Lq
LQ
0
N
m
m
m
LU
LU
LU
00-n
00 0
00 0
0
C?
LLI
C'T
m
m
vi
Cd
LLI
0
z
LU
'd
m
a
m
m LQ
N
m
0
00
000
0
�MN m
LU
a
-7
N
C�
LU
m
CL
uj
000
00
m
Ld
w
N
coo
0
0 0
0 0 0
MN m
0
C�
NN m
0.
0
Cf
0
ci
N
LU
Ix
z
Of
LU
I c
�C*
w
�t;
z
z
0
mco
Z
E i ca
w
C-)
E
Cl) C) 0
Cl)
-C-0
Zo
0
E E 0
0 U
0
wo
z
;R
E2
m 0
0
L)
-ED
m
0
w
Of
0
z
o
w
.2).M m
0
F- 02
STREET MAINTENANCE CONTRACTORS
The following contractors have performed the following projects for the month of November, 2004
DA'LE
A )UT
CCO NT
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIDGE
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
TOTAL COST
SIZE
CONTRACTOR: RENE'S COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT
Date: 11/15/04
# 5401
CITYWIDE CHANNELS
MECHANICAL WEED ABATEMENT, DEBRIS AND
TRASH REMOVAL OF CITYWIDE CHANNELS
TOTAL COST
—
$ 9,750.00
Date: 11/23/04
# 5402
CITYWIDE R.O.W.'S
APPLICATION OF PRE -EMERGENT HERBICIDES
TO CITYWIDE R.O.W.'S
rTOTAL COST
$ 2,100.00
CONTRACTOR: MONTELEONE EXCAVATING
Date: 11/01/04
# 999-5402
SERVICE LEVEL "R"
GRADE ALL DIRT ROADS IN SERVICE LEVEL
"R" AREAS
TOTAL COST
$ 960.00
Date: 11/01/04
# 5401
VIA LOBO CHANNEL
REMOVAL OF APPROXIMATELY 4,000 CUBIC
YARDS OF SILT FROM CHANNEL
TOTAL COST
$19,400.00
Date: 11/01/04
# 5401
EMPIRE CREEK
REMOVAL OF STEEL GRATES FROM CHANNEL
TOTAL COST
950.00
Date: 11/03/04
# 5401
VALLEJO CHANNEL BETWEEN
SANTIAGO& JOHN WARNER ROAD
CONSTRUCT 3 DESILTING PONDS FOR EROSION
CONTROL
TOTAL COST
—
$ 8,500.00
Date: 11/29/04
# 5401
VALLEJO AND YNEZ ROAD
REMOVAL OF SILT FROM CHANNEL.
TOTAL COST
$ 5,800.00
CONTRACTOR: BECKER ENGINEERING
Date: 11/04
# 5401
PAUBA ROAD WEST OF METHODIST
CHURCH
REPAIRS TO RIP -RAP AND P.CC DOWN SPOUT
TOTAL COST
$ 6,845.00
DATE
ACCOUNT
STREET/CHANNEL/BRIII)GE
DESCRIPTION
OF WORK
TOTAL COST
SIZE
Date: 11/04
# 5401
JOHN WARNER ROAD
PLACE RIP -RAP AT DRAINAGE OUTLET.
TOTAL COST
$ 645.00
Date: 11/04
# 5401
NADALANE
PLACE RIP -RAP AND P.CC AT TWO DOWN
SPOUTS
TOTAL COST
$ 4,420.00
Date: 11/04
# 5401
LOW FLOW BETWEEN DIAZ AND
VIA MONTEZUMA
REPAIR GATES AND REPLACE PARTS AS
NEEDED
TOTAL COST
$ 2,820.00
Date: 11/04
# 5401
CITYWIDE
EROSION CONTROL SAND BAG PLACEMENT
CITYWIDE
TOTAL COST
—
0.00
Date: 11/04
# 5401
3" STREET FAST OF MERCEDES
REPAIRS TO CULVERT & FENCE
TOTAL COST
5.00
Date: 11/04
# 5401
JEDEDIAH SMITH AT HWY. 79 SO.
PLACE P.CC SLURRY AROUND HEAD WALLS
TOTAL COST
$ 2,815.00_
Date:
TOTAL COST
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5401 $75,630.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #5402 $ 2,100.00
TOTAL COST ACCOUNT #99-5402 $ 960.00
R WAIWAI�OA=�WM�OECEMMR
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
ASPHALT (POTHOLES) REPAIRS
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2004
DATE
LOCATION
SCOPE OF WORK
S.F.
TOTAL
TONS
11/01/04
VALLEJO AT YNEZ
A.C. OVERLAY
72
1.5
11/08/04
CITYWIDE
FILLED POTHOLES
150
TEMP A.C.
11/08/04
CITYWIDE
FILLED POTHOLES
125
TEMP A.C.
11/15/04
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MARGARITA ROAD
R&R A.C.
160
5.5
11/16/04
RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AT MARGARITA ROAD
R&R A.C.
150
4.5
11/17/04
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
A.C. OVERLAY
1200
19.5
11/18/04
RAINBOW CANYON ROAD
A.C. OVERLAY
843
6.5
11/22/04
REISLING COURT
R&R A.C.
175
6.5
11/29/04
DEL REY AT VIA CORSICA
R&R A.C.
230
6.5
11/30/04
DEL REY AT VIA CORSICA
R&R A.C.
144
4.5
TOTAL S.F. OF REPAIRS 3,249
TOTAL TONS 55
R:WAIWAINIWKCMPLTD�PH�T.RPR�.05�OVEMBER.N
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
CATCH BASIN MAINTENANCE
MONTH OF NOIVEMBER, 2004
DATE
LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
11/01/04
CITYWIDE
CLEANED & CHECKED
45 CATCH BASINS
11/08/04
CITYWIDE
CLEANED & CHECKED
37 CATCH BASINS
11/09/04
CITYWIDE
CLEANED & CHECKED
62 CATCH BASINS
11/18/04
AREA #3
CLEANED & CHECKED
19 CATCH BASINS
11/19/04
AREA #3
CLEANED & CHECKED
12 CATCH BASINS
11/23/04
AREA #4
CLEANED & CHECKED
29 CATCH BASINS
11/29/04
CITYWIDE
CLEANED & CHECKED
10 CATCH BASINS
11/30/04
AREAS #1 & #3
CLEANED & CHECKED
44 CATCH BASINII
TOTAL CATCH BASINS CLEANED & CHECKED 258
R WAI�MMWKCMPL�D�ATCMAS�.05WOVEMBER.W
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
GRAFFITI REMOVAL
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2004
DATE
LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
11/10/04
VINCENT MORAGA AT 6 TH STREET
126 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/01/04
TARGET CENTER
-REMOVED
REMOVED
35 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/01/04
WINCHESTER AT YNEZ
REMOVED
210 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/03/04
MIRA LOMA CHANNEL
REMOVED
50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/08/04
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
REMOVED
50 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/08/04
NICOLAS ROAD
REMOVED
16 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/08/04
NO. GENERAL KEARNEY BRIDGE
REMOVED
72 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/09/04
MARGARITA PARK
REMOVED
200 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/15/04
6 T' AT PUJOL
REMOVED
450 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/15/04
VIA LOBO CHANNEL
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/15/04
1-15 AT WINCHESTER
REMOVED
10 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/16/04
BUTTERFIELD STAGE BRIDGE
REMOVED
550 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/17/04
PUJOL AT MAIN STREET
REMOVED
15 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/22/04
TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
203 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/22/04
PUJOL AREA
REMOVED
290 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/23/04
MAIN STREET BRIDGE
REMOVED
40 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
11/29/04
TARGET CENTER
REMOVED
20 S.F. OF GRAFFITI
Li
TOTAL S.F. GRAFFITI REMOVED 2,347
TOTAL LOCATIONS 17
R:��AIMWKCWLTD�GR�Ti\W.05�OVEMBER
co r- CD Lr)
-14, CO)
cm
u 0
0 Z
>
0 Z CS
U
w
0
z
0
I.-
CL
LU
uj
z
:3
w
CL
LU
LL
z
LL
a
Cl)
Cl)
0
It =� CN
00 tn r-
CD
en
tt
fos
C'� Cq
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
RIGHT-OF-WAY TREE TRIMMING
MONTH OF, 2004
DATE LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/30/04 ELINDA ROAD TRIMMED 4 R.O.W. TREES
LETOTAL R.O.W. TREES TRIMMED 4
R XMAT�ATMWRWr�MPTT�ITVPPQN� A�
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SERVICE ORDER REQUEST LOG
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2004
DATE
RFC'D
LOCATION
REQUEST
DATE WORK
COMPLETED
11/01/04
29835 CORTE GRANDE
A.C. REPAIR
11/01/04
11/01/04
45350 TESIBEN COURT
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11101104
11/01/04
LEENA WAY AT MEADOWS PARKWAY
REPAIR R-1
11/01/04
11/01/04
1 32254 CALLE BALAREZA
CAMERA IN CATCH BASIN
11101104
11/01/04
42113 SO. HILLS DRIVE
TREE REMOVAL
11/01/04
11/01/04
RANCHO VISTA AT MIRA LOMA
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/01/04
11/01/04
39340 LIEFER ROAD
STREET GRADING
11/01/04
11/01/04
312007 SHABA CIRCLE
RAISED SIDEWALK
11/01/04
11/02/04
42681 LOMA PORTOLA DRIVE
TREE DOWN
11/02/04
11/02/04
30148 CORTE PLATA
TREE TRIMMING
11/02/04
11/02/04
30940 BRANFORD DRIVE
TREE REPLACEMENT
11/02/04
11/02/04
30216 MIRA LOMA DRIVE
POTHOLES
11/02/04
11/03/04
OVERLAND DRIVE
BROKEN SPRINKLER
11/03/04
11/04/04
41639 CYPRESS POINT WAY
REQUESTING SCRAP METAL
11/04/04
11/05/04
SANTIAGO ROAD
CULVERT PIPES
11/05/04
11/05/04
44856 LINALOU RANCH ROAD
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/05/04
11/58/04
1 JOSEPH ROAD LOW FLOW
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/05/04
11/08/04
45501 CLUBHOUSE DRIVE
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/08/04
11/08/04
DIAZ LOW FLOW
CLOSED LOW FLOW
11/08/04
11/08/04
31250 NICOLAS ROAD
POTHOLE
11/08/04
11/09/04
31745 CORTE ENCINAS
TREE LEANING
11/09/04
11/10/04
DE PORTOLA AT VIA ANGELES
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/10/04
11/12/04
YNEZ AT OVERLAND
POTHOLES
11/12/04
11/12/04
WINCHESTER AT DIAZ
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/12/04
11/15/04
43119 VIA DOS PICOS
HOLE IN A.C.
11/15/04
R WAINTAIM�KCOMPLTD�ORS�.05WOVEMBER W
DATE
FEC'D
LOCATION
REQUEST
DATE WORK
COMPLETED
11/16/04
WINCHESTER AT DIAZ
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/16/04
11/16/04
43447 CALLE NACIDO
SIDEWALK REPAIR
11/16/04
11/17/04
RIDGE GATE DRIVE
S.N.S. MISSING
11/17/04
11/17/04
CAMINO PIEDRA ROJO AT PASQUAL
SIGN DOWN
11/17/04
11/17/04
30552 IRON BARK COURT
ROOT PRUNING
11/17/04
11/17/04
43883 BUTTERNUT DRIVE
DEAD TREE
11/17/04
11/17/04
42356 MASKUAU COURT
S.N.S. DOWN
11/19/04
11/22/04
30150 CABRILLO
DEBRIS PICK-UP
11/22/04
11/22/04
30602 MIRA LOMA DRIVE
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/22/04
11/22/04
27548 PARKSIDE DRIVE
LJFrED DRIVEWAY
11/22/04
11/23/04
MIRA LOMA / RANCHO VISTA
DEBRIS REMOVAL
11/23/04
11/29/04
LIEFER ROAD
SINKHOLE
11/29/04
11/30/04
30368 VIA CAf4ADA
PONDING WATER
11/30/04
L
TOTAL SERVICE ORDER REQUESTS 38
R:WAI�MMWRKCOMPLTD�ORS�.05�OVEMBER.N
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
SIGNS
MONTH OF NOVEMBER- 2804
DATE
LOCATION
WORK COMPLETED
11/01/04
CALLE RIVAS AT BEJARANO
INSTALLED
3 R-1-A
11/01/04
CITYWIDE
REPAIRED
9 SIGNS
11/02/04
MUIRFIELD AT PECHANGA
INSTALLED
G-9
11/03/04
MEADOWVIEW AREA
REPLACED
12 W-80 WITH 12 W-16-A
11/04/04
JEREZ AT MEDENA
INSTALLED
R-1, 3 R-1-A
11/04/04
RORIPAUGH AT JON CHRISTIAN
INSTALLD
R-1
11/08/04
OVERLAND AT PROMENADE WAY
REPLACED
R-7, K MARKER
11/09/04
JEFFERSON AT WINCHESTER
REPLACED
R-7, K MARKER & R- 18
11/09/04
MARGARITA BEFORE DE PORTOLA
REPLACED
R-10
11/10/04
VIA LOS ALTOS AT AVENIDA DEL REPOSO
INSTALLED
W-53
11/10/04
ALRIZO AT CAMINO GALLEGOS
REPLACED
R-7
11/10/04
NICHOLAS AT WALCOTT
REPLACED
9 CARSONITES
11/10/04
1 FELICITA AT VIA NORTE
INSTALLED
W-16
11/15/04
MEADOWVIEW AREA
INSTALLED
6 R2-1 35
11/17/04
OVERLAND AT JEFFERSON
INSTALLED
RI-2
11/23/04
SANTIAGO E/O YNEZ
REPLACED
R-2 35
1 11/23/04
WALCOTT AT CALLE CHAPOS
REPLACED
W-57, "N" MARKER
11/23/04
CITYWIDE
REPAIRED
25 SIGNS
11/24/04
E. LOMA LINDA AT MASKAZCI
REPLACED
S.N.S.
11/24/04
CITYWIDE
REPAIRED
11 SIGNS
11/29/04
MARGARITA AT AVENIDA DEL SOL
REPLACED
R-7, K MARKER
11/29/04
CITYWIDE
REPAIRED
25 SIGNS
11/30/04
NO. GENERAL KEARNEY @ CALLE PNA COLADA
INSTALLED
2 "N" MARKERS
TOTAL SIGNS REPLACED 34
TOTAL SIGNS INSTALLED 20
TOTAL SIGNS REPAIRED 70
CITY OF TEMECULA
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
ROADS DIVISION
STENCILS / STRIPING
MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2004
D LOCATION WORK COMPLETED
11/15/04 MEADOWVIEW AREA INSTALLED 6LEGENDS
TOTAL NEW & REPAINTED LEGENDS 6
NEW & REPAINTED RED CURB & STRIPING L.F. 0
R WAI�AIM�KCOWLTD�TRIPING�.05�OVE�ER.�