HomeMy WebLinkAbout011790 CC MinutesMINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 17, 1990
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:03 p.m. in the Temecula
Unified School District Board Room, 31350 Rancho Vista Road, Temecula, California. Mayor
Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attomey Scott F. Field, and Acting Deputy
City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Councilmember Sal Muffoz.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Pat Birdsall.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
There were no announcements made.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Howard Chesher, 29710 Valle Olvera, spoke in favor of the KRTM TV antenna tower remaining
at its present location.
Bill Benson, Del Rey Road, addressed the Council regarding the dumping problem occurring
along Solana Way.
Jimmy Moore, 41747 Borealis Drive, commented on the poll conducted in the Rancho News
relative to the antenna tower erected by KRTM.
Minutes 1/17/90 I
COUNCIL BUSINESS
2. Procedure for lnlposing a Business lJcenqe Tax and Increasing the Tranqient
Occupancy Tax.
City Attorney Scott Field presented the staff report and advised the City Council on the
procedures required for increasing any tax. He outlined the three options available to the
City as contained in the staff report.
In response to a question from Mayor Parks, Mr. Field stated that the Transient
Occupancy Tax being collected by the County of Riverside is currently at 8 %.
Councilmember Lindemans stated that in his opinion the purpose of a business tax was
more regulatory in nature, and not adopted necessarily as a revenue producer.
Dean Manning, representing the Temecula Creek Inn, spoke regarding the Transient
Occupancy Tax and stated that the Temecula Creek Inn had received an opinion that the
City did not have the right to receive any of the funds collected by the County of Riverside
from December 1, 1989.
Councilmember Birdsall, suggested that the City Attorney contact Michelle Zimmerman,
Asst. Chief Administrative Officer with the County of Riverside, to determine the
distribution of these tax funds.
Howard Chesher, 29710 Valle Olvera, encouraged the City Council to leave the Transient
Occupancy Tax at its current level.
Allan McDonald, representing the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, addressed the
Council regarding the Business License Tax and requested a 30 day period for the
Chamber to conduct a study of the effects of this tax as it will affect the members of the
chamber.
Bill Bopf, representing Bedford Properties, asked that the City make the Transient
Occupancy Tax competitive with the surrounding areas and suggested that some of the
moneys realized from this tax be earmarked for the community's tourism promotion.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans that the
question of the Business License Tax be continued for 30 days to allow the Temecula
Valley Chamber of Commerce the time to conduct their proposed study.
The motion was unanimously carried by the following vote:
Minutes 1/17/90 2
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Mayor Parks directed the City Attorney to return to the City Council with a report on the
disposition of the Transient Occupancy Tax funds after he has addressed this matter with
the County of Riverside.
Me!!o-Roos Financial Consnltant's Report
City Manager Frank Aleshire gave a staff report explaining the reasons for the withdrawal
by the consulting firm of Kadie-Jensen, Johnson & Bodnar.
City Attorney Scott Field advised that Council, that since the matter of selecting a
replacement did not appear on the agenda, the council could, at their discretion, vote to
add this matter to the agenda, but it must be passed by a 4/5 majority.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to add
cons'Meration of the appointment of a Financial Consultant for Mello-Roos to the agenda.
The motion was unanimously carried.
City Manager Frank Aleshire outlined the material contained in the staff report prepared
for the City Council agenda of January 9, 1990 and recommended that the City Council
approve the proposal of Douglas Ford and Associates.
Councilmember Birdsall pointed out that the staff report indicated a figure of $9,500 in
error, the total amount to conduct the study according to the Douglas Ford proposal should
be $9,800.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz, to retain
the services of Douglas Ford and Associates as financial consultant on the Mello-Roos
project.
In response to a question from Councilmember Birdsall, Mr. Ford indicated that while he
could, if necessary, meet the original deadline, he would like to have the full 5 weeks
originally specified in the R.F.P.
Minutes 1/17/90 3
Councilmember Mufioz questioned the consultant, regarding any possible conflict of
interest he might have. Mr. Ford responded that to the best of his knowledge he did not
have any existing conflicts.
The motion on the floor to hire the finn of Douglas Ford and Associates was unanimously
carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
C OUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0
C OUNCILMEMBERS: None
City Manager Frank Aleshire outlined the need for the City Council to clarify any
questions with regard to the proposal at this meeting, to allow the consultant to begin
immediately.
Mr. Doug Ford addressed the Council explaining how the report would be structured and
how his firm would be proceeding to prepare the report. He stated that the report would
be outlining alternative funding methods to Mello-Roos.
Mayor Parks stated that he would like to have the major emphasis placed on the area of
the City's funding responsibilities rather than on an analysis of the viability of Mello-Roos
districts.
Councilmember Lindemans requested that the consultant dwell on the aspect of the benefits
to be derived by the City.
Councilmember Mufioz stressed that he would like to see the equity of the proposal and
he would like to see the funding and income figures extended for a 20 to 25 year period
of time. He would like to know what other Mello-Roos Districts are in operation with
customs and practices similar to the proposal for Temecula.
Bill Bopf requested that the consultant look at a possibility of the City being given
additional control by the County of Riverside. He also responded to a question from
Mayor Parks that the schedule of construction could be changed, but the
developer/landowners would want some form of agreement to guarantee the continuance
of future phases.
Councilmember Mufioz requested that the consultant place a value on the benefit of having
Mello-Roos funding versus other available funding methods.
Minutes 1/17/90 4
Mr. Douglas Ford stated that he would like to be assured of the level of response he might
expect from all the participants in order to complete the study within the tight time
constraints.
3. Me!!o-Roos Traffic Conqultant's Report
City Manager Frank Aleshire gave a brief staff report and introduced John Kain with the
firm of Kunzman and Associates.
Mr. Kain introduced his associate Carl Ballard who will be working on the study as well.
He outlined the manner in which his firm will be proceeding to complete the required
report. He stated that ideally the City would be setting up a forecast model but that due
to the time limits involved, that would not be undertaken as a part of this study. He
explained that Kunzman and Associates will take existing traffic data and project various
land use proposals, assigning those traffic generation figures on top of the existing traffic
to project the present and future needs of the area.
Mayor Parks requested that the consultant address the benefits to the City specifically
from a Mello-Roos District.
Councilmember Lindemans requested information based on the question "can the City live
with the phasing suggested?".
Councilmember Mufioz asked the consultant to address if the proposal solves the traffic
problems identified. He would like to know the length of time these solutions will be good
for.
Mr. Kain responded that solutions need to be tied to development. He stated that there
will need to be some assessments of land use elements in order to make the assumptions
asked for.
Councilmember Mufioz asked if the consultants could validate the numbers included in the
plan. Mr. Kain responded that this could not be done within the scope of the proposed
study.
Councilmember Moore requested the consultant deal with the efficacy of an additional
freeway overcrossing.
Mayor Parks asked that they address the improvements proposed for Margarita Road
within the first phase of development.
Minutes 1/17/90 5
Bill Bopf stated that the developers would like the consultant to look at the timing to be
anticipated for the needed improvements without the implementation of a Mello-Roos
District. He would also like to know what the traffic impacts will be without any action
being taken. Finally he suggested looking at the data from the developers traffic
consultants regarding the other overcrossings and interchanges proposed.
City Attorney Scott Field advised the City Council that Mr. Douglas Ford had expressed
some concern with regard to his firm's working on a project for a parmership, which was
partially owned by Bedford Properties. Mr. Field advised that he would meet with Mr.
Ford the following day (January 18, 1990) to determine if this in any way constitutes a
conflict of interest.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to
reconsider the matter of the hiring of the firm of Douglas Ford and Associates.
The motion carded by the following vote:
AYES: 4
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Parks
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to award
the contract as a financial consultant to Douglas Ford and Associates subject to a finding
by the City Attorney that no conflict of interest exists.
The motion was unanimously carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 C OUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECESS
Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8:52 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:08 p.m.
Minutes 1/17/90 6
1. Ordinance E~tabli,~hing the Temecula Municipal Code
City Manager Frank Aleshire gave a staff report explaining the way in which the
ordinances are set up for codification.
The City Attorney suggested the Council consider the sections individually, and take straw
votes on the various sections, prior to taking action on the adoption of the whole code.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned if the provisions of Section 1.01.250, dealing with
nuisance abatement, would be retroactive upon adoption of the code.
The City Attorney replied that the provisions would apply for on-going nuisances.
Councilmember Mufioz questioned Section 2.06.050 and stated that he felt all of the City
Councilmembers should be involved in the appointment of members of various
commissions.
Mayor Parks stated that he felt any two councilmembers could be effective doing the
screening and review of commission candidates.
Councilmember Lindemans suggested the two members to nominate commissions should
be the mayor and one other member of the council.
Councilmember Birdsall recommended that the ordinance should read "Members of each
commission shall be appointed by an Ad Hoc Committee of two Councilmembers.
Councilmember Moore suggested substituting the word nominate for the word appoint in
section 2.06.050.
The City attorney read the amended wording for the section as follows: "Members of each
commission shall be nominated by an Ad Hoc Committee of two Councilmembers subject
to the approval of a majority of the City Council."
The council took a straw vote on the amendment to section 2.06.050. The straw vote
passed by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans
Moore, Parks
NOES: 1
C OUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes 1/17/90 7
Mayor Parks addressed his concern regarding the residency requirement for commissioners
in section 2.06.030. He also expressed concern that the limitation in the section should
be for two "consecutive" terms.
On a motion by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore a straw vote
was taken to amend the wording in Section 2.06.030 to read "No person shall be eligible
for appointment as a commission member for more than two full consecutive terms (six
(6) years).
The straw vote carded by the following vote:
AYES:
3 COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Moore, Parks
NOES:
2 COUNCILMEMBERS
Lindemans, Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS None
Mayor Parks requested that Chapter 2.50.020, be changed to reflect the date of January
1, 1990, rather than 1989.
Councilmember Birdsall, requested that the section number in 1.01.250 (a) be corrected
to read 1.01.240 of this chapter.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to waive
further reading and introduce the ordinance as amended by the City Council in discussion
and by straw vote. The motion carried as follows:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Parks
NOES:
1 COUNCILMEMBERS: Mufioz
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Minutes 1/17/90 8
ADJOURNMENT
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Birdsall to adjourn
to Saturday, January 20, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. at the Temecula City Hall, 43172 Business
Park Drive, Temecula, California. The motion was unanimously carded and the Mayor
declared the meeting adjourned at 9:57 p.m.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATTEST:
F. D. Aleshire, City Clerk
Minutes 1/17/90 9