HomeMy WebLinkAbout012390 CC MinutesMINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
HELD JANUARY 23, 1990
A regular meeting of the Temecula City Council was called to order at 7:07 p.m. in the Temecula
Community Center, 28816 Pujol Street, Temecula, California. Mayor Ron Parks presiding.
PRESENT 5
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Also present were City Manager Frank Aleshire, City Attorney Scott F. Field, and Acting Deputy
City Clerk June S. Greek.
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Pastor Bill Rench of Calvary Baptist Church.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The audience was led in the Pledge of Allegiance by Councilmember Pat Birdsall.
PRESENTATIONS/
PROCLAMATIONS
Captain Bill Reynolds of the Riverside Sheriff's Department presented the City of Temecula with
the first of the official Neighborhood Watch signs which will be posted throughout the
community.
Kim Chubota, Southem California Director of the League of California Cities addressed the City
Council and extended an invitation to the City and City Councilmembers to join the League
organization. She outlined the resources available to member cities and the networking
opportunities afforded to members. Ms. Chubota also presented the City with a number of
resource materials prepared by the League specifically for newly incorporated municipalities.
Minutes 1/23/90 I
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Linda Cloghen, 41304 Bravos Court, Temecula addressed the City Council regarding the timing
for hiring of the position of City Clerk and stated that she felt the current salary for the Deputy
City Clerk was too high. She also questioned who currently holds the position of Deputy City
Manager.
John Cloghen, 41304 Bravos Court, Temecula questioned several budget expenditures he had read
about and expressed concern regarding the City's hiring of consultants.
Gretchen Hass, 41585 Avenida Rancho Vista, Temecula, representing the PTO at Temecula
Valley High School, spoke regarding a Temecula Valley High Grad Night. She requested moral
support from the community, financial support if possible, and general support of the philosophy
of a Grad Night using this forum.
Lynda Meacham, 42109 Roanoake Street, Temecula addressed the City Council regarding the
Valencia Apartments, planned for construction off Rancho California Road. She presented the
City with petitions containing 384 signatures in opposition to building this apartment project. She
cited school overcrowding as a primary concern.
Ronni Crossland, 30632 Hollyberry Lane, Temecula spoke in opposition to two additional
apartment complexes being planned for the one square mile area in the vicinity of Rancho
California Road, bordered by Moraga and Margarita Roads. She specified concerns with an
increase in crime as a result of high density and overcrowded conditions.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Councilmember Birdsall requested that item number 4 be removed from the Consent Calendar.
Councilmember Moore requested the minutes of December 26, 1989 be corrected on pages one
and four to show four Councilmembers present and voting and one Councilmember absent.
Councilmember Mufioz requested a name and street address correction on page two of the minutes
of January 9, 1990. The corrections were noted by the Acting Deputy City Clerk.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to approve items
1, 2 and 3 of the Consent Calendar as corrected.
Minutes 1/23/90 2
o
o
Approval of Minutes
1.1 Approved the minutes of the meeting of December 26, 1989 as amended.
1.2 Approved the minutes of the meeting of January 9, 1990 as amended.
Application for Alcoholic Beverage l,icen~
2.1 Received and Filed application for Alcoholic Beverage License filed by Ralphs
Grocery company - Northeast corner Winchester Road and Nicholas Road.
Resolution Approving Payment of Demand~
3.1 Adopted a Resolution entitled
Resolution No. 90-07
A Resolution of the City Council of the City of Temecula, approving
the warrant register, dated January 23, 1990.
The motion was unanimously carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
Second Reading of Ordinance Fstablishing the Temecula Municipal Code
David Lowry, 273 Jefferson,//206, Temecula addressed the City Council objecting to the
provisions of the code section (2.06.030) limiting participation in City Commissions and
Committees to residents of the City.
Marc Grisham, 35750 Greer Road, Sun City, added his objection to the limitation on
Commissions to residents of Temecula only.
Minutes 1/23/90 3
Larry Markham, 41750 Winchester Road, Ste. N, Temecula, spoke regarding the subject
of the residency requirements for Commission appointments and requested that the City
Council consider members of the business community, who do not live within the City,
eligible to serve on Commissions.
Councilmember Mufioz spoke in favor of retaining the provision of section 2.05.030 as
set forth in the proposed ordinance.
Councilmember Lindemans stated he felt the strong Chamber of Commerce within the City
presents an excellent opportunity for all members of the business community to become
involved with the community and be represented.
Mayor Parks outlined his concerns for making commission spots open to all segments of
the community.
Councilmember Birdsall also stated her preference for not limiting commissions to
residents only.
Councilmember Moore expressed her feelings with regard to having the electorate
represented on the commissions in the same manner as on the City Council.
RECF~S
The mayor declared a short recess at 8:06 p.m. for the purpose of changing the audio tape. The
meeting was reconvened at 8:07 p.m. with all members present.
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Moore to amend
section 2.06.050 of the code to read, "Members of each commission shall be nominated
by an Ad Hoc Committee of two Councilmembers subject to the approval of a four-fifths
(4/5) majority of the City Council."
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
reopen the public comments section on this matter. The motion was unanimously carried.
Howard Chesher, 29710 Valle Olvera, Temecula, addressed the City Council speaking in
opposition to the passage of section 2.06.050 as it applies to the choice of a two member
Ad Hoc Committee. He expressed his opinion that each Councilmember should make a
selection of candidates to be presented to the entire City Council for ratification by a four-
fifths majority.
Minutes 1/23/90 4
Following discussion the motion to amend Section 2.06.050 was passed by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: 4
NOES: 1
ABSENT: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Parks
Mufioz
None
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to read
by title only, waive further reading and introduce Ordinance 90-02 as follows:
ORDINANCE NO. 90-02
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
TEMECULA ESTABLISHING THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL
CODE, AND ENACTING TITLES 1, 2 AND 3 THEREOF,
RELATING TO GENERAL PROVISIONS, ADMINISTRATION AND
PERSONNEL, AND REVENUE AND FINANCE
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Lindemans,
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
C OUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS: None
RECFSS
Mayor Parks declared a recess at 8;30 p.m.
with all Councilmembers present.
The meeting was reconvened at 8:45 p.m.
Minutes 1123190 5
PUBLIC HEARING
Plot Plan No. 10864 - Appeal of Planning, Commi~ion~'s Approval of 335 Unit
Apartment Complex on ~.~z Acres.
Mayor Parks declared the Public Hearing open at 8:46 p.m. and explained the process for
hearing all interested parties.
Staff Report
City Manager Frank Aleshire introduced County of Riverside Planning staff member
Laurie Dobson who gave the staff report outlining the history of the zoning considerations
on the subject property. She explained the basis upon which the appeal had been filed.
Councilmember Lindemans questioned if the provisions of the Quimby Act had been met
for this project. He also inquired if the park fees had been paid.
Richard McCatt, principal planner for the County of Riverside, responded stating that only
he didn't know if this project is subject to park fees.
Applicant Presentation
The applicant, Stan Steel, 13555 Plantation Way, Moreno Valley, addressed the Council,
expressing a willingness to return to the City Council with the specific landscaping plan
showing the percentage of open space and play areas. He also stated that the figure of
1,800 additional residents would represent 5-6 residents per apartment, which in his
opinion could not be determined prior to actual occupancy.
Grant Beckland, 647 North Main, Riverside, engineer for the project, presented a map
showing how drainage is being handled.
Mayor Parks questioned the position of the retaining wall adjacent to the appellants
property.
Mr. Beckland showed a map detailing the retaining wall and percentage of the grade slope
at Los Colinas.
Councilmember Lindemans questioned the street access for the project. Mr. Steel pointed
out two points of entry and exit, one from Moraga Road and one from the cul-de-sac off
Rancho California Road.
City Manager Aleshire requested a report from the developer regarding the fees being paid
for public improvements. The applicant responded that fees were being paid for traffic
Minu~s 1/23/90 6
signalization, fire mitigation, flood mitigation, Kangaroo Rat litigation fees, and building
permit fees.
Appellant Presentation
Robert Oder, 29923 Mira Loma Drive, Temecula, addressed the City Council speaking
in opposition to the proposed apartment development. He addressed the history of the
project and presented his continuing concerns about the project. He advised the Council
that the project represents a 53% increase in density over his neighboring apartment
project.
Tamar Stein, Esq., of Cox, Castle and Nicholson, 2049 Century Park East, Los Angeles,
representing the appellants outlined the points covered in her letter to the City Council
dated January 19, 1990. Her testimony stressed concerns regarding the incompleteness of
the project file currently in the City's possession. In summary, she stated the
environmental assessment was not complete enough for the Council to support the
recommendation of the County Planning Department.
Robert Oder, Sr., 29911 Mira Loma Drive, //63, Temecula, spoke to the matter of
retaining the current topography. In response to a question from Mayor Parks, he stated
that there is not an existing flood control easement across his property. In response to a
question from Councilmember Lindemans, Mr. Oder stated the density of his apartment
project is 12.18 units per acre.
Helen Oder, 29911 Mira Loma Drive//63, Temecula, requested that the Council consider
the fragility of the Empire Creek.
Public Input
Ron Fortson, Assistant Superintendent of Schools, representing the Temecula Valley
Unified School District, requested the City Council allow the School District time to assess
the impact regarding the number of students this project will generate.
Jean Sparkman, 30554 San Pasqual, Temecula, representing the Temecula School Board
requested denial of this project based on the number of additional pupils it will generate.
Steve Sander, 40213 Holden Circle, Temecula spoke in opposition to the project because
of the limited open space and because of the lack of input by citizens of Temecula during
the planning process.
Jim Allmon, 43594 Gatewood Way, Temecula stated that there are already too many
apartmetns and too much traffic congestion.
Minutes 1/23/90 7
John Cloghen, 41304 Bravos Court, Temecula spoke in opposition to the staff
recommendation, citing the traffic congestion and crime rates in rental properties.
Rebuttal
Grant Becklund said there is a need for a flood control easement and that the school
impacts were addressed during the approval process at the staff level.
Stan Steele said he believes the developers have adequately addressed environmental
concerns in the planning of this project. He stated that he would look favorably on a
continuance to allow the developers to explore the City's criteria which differs from that
of the County.
The owner, Mr. Tony Boyd responded to a question from Councilmember Lindemans that
he might not be the builder of the project if further delays occur.
Mayor Parks declared the public hearing closed at 10:15 p.m.
Councilmember Lindemans spoke regarding the density considerations and the need to
respect the existing topography.
Mayor Parks expressed his concern regarding the changes in topography inherent in the
design. He also outlined his concerns about the retaining walls and agreed that the criteria
has changed as a result of the City's incorporation and involvement in these projects.
City Attorney Scott Field outlined the Council's options as follows:
1. Approve the project and deny the appeal.
2. Approve the project and add new conditions.
3. Reopen the hearing and continue the project to a date certain with instructions to
staff for considerations to be addressed at the next hearing.
4. Deny the project subject to staff preparing a resolution reflecting the findings
which confirm the denial.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to deny
Plot Plan 1086 subject to the appropriate resolution to be prepared by City staff reflecting
the appropriate findings.
Minutes 1/23/90 8
Tony Boyd, owner, responded to a question from Councilmember Moore, that he would
prefer to see the project given the opportunity to make modifications rather than
compelling them to start over again with the entire development process.
Councilmember Mufioz withdrew the motion on the floor and Councilmember Lindemans
withdrew the second.
Councilmember Birdsall questioned the necessary time frame needed by the developers to
address the concerns expressed by the City Council during the deliberations.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue the meeting for an additional five (5) minutes.
The motion was unanimously carded.
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Lindemans to
continue the matter "off calendar" and refer it back to staff.
The motion was unanimously carried by the following vote:
AYES: 5
COUNCILMEMBERS
Birdsall, Lindemans
Moore, Mufioz, Parks
NOES:
0 COUNCILMEMBERS None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS None
It was moved by Councilmember Birdsall, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to extend
the meeting to 11:00 p.m. The motion was unanimously carried.
Councilmember Lindemans left the chamber at 10:37 p.m.
6. Appointment of Alternate Voting Member of WRAG
City Manager Aleshire gave a staff report and recommended that the Council appoint an
alternate voting member.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz that
Councilmember Birdsall be appointed as the City of Temecula's alternate voting member
to the Western Riverside Association of Governments.
Minutes 1/23/90 9
The motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: 4 COUNCILMEMBERS: Birdsall, Moore,
Mufioz, Parks
NOES: 0
COUNCILMEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 1
COUNCILMEMBERS: Lindemans
Resolution Approvin_~ a Contract for Financial Services
It was moved by Councilmember Mufioz, seconded by Councilmember Moore to continue
the item to the meeting of January 30, 1990.
Councilmember Lindemans rejoined the meeting at 10:44 p.m.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Traffic lnlprovement Projects on 1-15 Overcrossin_~s
City Manager Frank Aleshim presented a staff recommendation that the City Council
appoint a traffic committee to review proposals to improve traffic movement over the 1-15
bridges. He suggested that the Council appoint the members of the Transportation
Subcommittee of the Growth Awareness Committee of the Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce, to include E. B. Adair, Auto Club of Southern California; Chuck Collins,
Ranpac Engineering; Curt Hawkins, Hawkins and Robertson, Associates; Knox Johnson,
private citizen and Jack Leathers private citizen.
Mr. E. B. Adair, Jr. 450 W. Stetson Avenue, Hemet, representing the Automobile Club
of Southern California addressed the City Council regarding the growth and traffic
problems within the valley and the traffic Auto Club's efforts to work with the community
on the problem areas.
Jim Allmon, 43954 Gatewood Way, Temecula, urged these problems be addressed with
the utmost urgency.
Minutes 1/23/90 10
David Lowrey, 27349 Jefferson,/~r206, Temecula spoke regarding the immediate needs and
priorities for solving the traffic problems. He suggested the City adopt the plan set forth
by Ron Roberts of the CHP for providing uniformed traffic direction at the two 1-15
overcrossings and at Winchester Road at Ynez. In addition he volunteered his efforts to
fund one week of the cost to implement the plan.
The Council directed the staff to add Ron Roberts and David Lowrey to the Traffic Study
Committee as well as a representative from Cal Trans and the County Road Department.
It was moved by Councilmember Moore, seconded by Councilmember Mufioz to
implement and evaluate the uniformed traffic direction as proposed. The staff was directed
to come back to the City council no later than 30 days with a report on the effectiveness
of the experiment.
The City Manager advised that this Traffic Committee must comply with the conditions
of the Brown Act.
In response to a question from Councilmember Birdsall, Captain Ron Roberts of the CHP
stated that the CHP has had experience with this type of program during such events as the
Tractor Races and Balloon and Wine Festival.
After discussion Councilmember Moore and Councilmember Mufioz agreed to restate the
motion as follows:
It is moved to implement the program outlined by Ron Roberts of the CI-IP, with private
funding and to create a traffic committee, subsequent to the implementation, further, to
bring back a report on the effectiveness of the program to the City Council within 30 days.
The motion was unanimously carried.
Minutes 1/23/90 11
AD.IOURNMENT
Mayor Parks declared the meeting adjourned at 11:02 p.m., to an adjourned regular meeting to
be held at 7:00 p.m. on January 30, 1990 at the Rancho California Water District's Community
Room, 28061 Diaz Road, Temecula, California.
Ronald J. Parks, Mayor
ATI~EST:
F. D. Aleshire, City Clerk
Minutes 1/23/90 12