HomeMy WebLinkAbout010505 PC Agenda
erI, "', In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to
participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the ,City Clerk (951) 694-6444,
Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements
to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II]
AGENDA
TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE
January 5, 2005 - 6:00 P.M.
........
Next in Order:
Resolution No. 2005-001
CALL TO ORDER
Flag Salute:
Roll Call:
Commissioner Chiniaeff
Chiniaeff, Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Telesio
.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Commission
on items that are not listed on the Agenda. Speakers are limited to three (3) minutes
each. If you desire to speak to the Commission about an item not on the Agenda, a
salmon colored "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the
Commission Secretary.
When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record.
For all other agenda items a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the
Commission Secretary m:[Qr to the Commission addressing that item. There is a three
(3) minute time limit for individual speakers.
CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC
All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will
be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless
Members of the Planning Commission request specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate action.
AQenda
.
RECOMMENDATION:
R: IP LAN C 0 MMlAg end as \20 05 \0 1-0 5-0 5. d oc
1.1 Approve the Agenda of January 05, 2005
.
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of October 6,2004
2.2 Approve the Minutes of October 20, 2004
COMMISSION BUSINESS
Elect new Chairperson and Vice Chairperson
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a
public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the
approval of the project(s) at the time of hearing. If you challenge any of the
projects in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone
else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondences delivered to the
Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing.
New Items
3 PlanninQ Application Nos. PA04-0134 and PA04-136. a Development Plan and Tentative
Tract Map No. 32113. submitted bv Matthew FaQan Consultants. to construct two. multi-
tenant industrial buildinQs on 8.5 acres. BuildinQ A is 73.148 square feet and includes 27
industrial condominium units ranQinQ in size from 2.066 to 4.143 square feet and BuildinQ B
is 55.785 square feet and includes 17 industrial condominium units ranQinQ in size from
2.066 to 4.143 square feet. located on the north side of ReminQton Avenue and south side
of Dendv Road. between Diaz Road and Winchester Road. Cheryl Kitzerow. Associate
Planner.
.
4 PlanninQ Application Nos. PA04-0359 and PA04-0365. Tentative Tract Map No. 32104 and
a Home Product Review. submitted bv Grevstone Homes. to subdivide 5.2 acres into 53
sinQle familv residential lots. 18 open space lots. one street lot. and consider the
architectural desiQn and placement of the proposed homes within the tract. located on the
northwest corner of Lake House Road and Sarasota Lane within the Harveston Specific
Plan area. Matthew Harris. Associate Planner.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORTS
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
ADJOURNMENT
Next regular meeting: January 19, 2005
Council Chambers
43200 Business Park Drive
Temecula, CA 92590
.
R:\PLANCOMMlAgendas\200S\01'()5-0S.dOC
.
ITEM #2
.
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 06, 2004
CALL TO ORDER
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday, October 6, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
Chairman Telesio thanked Eve Craig for the prelude music.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Guerriero led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff, Guerriero, and Chairman Telesio.
Absent:
Mathewson and Olhasso.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Mr. Dough Kerner representing Temecula Creek Inn, expressed concern with the Joint City
CounciVPlanning Commission minutes of August 10, 2004. Mr. Kerner relayed that it is his
opinion that the minutes of the workshop did not completely reflect the substance of the
discussion in regard to the General Plan land use Issue discussion.
For the Commission, Ms. Ubnoske clarified that what came before the Joint Workshop was the
CACs recommendation; noting that it was not a Public Hearing and that it would not be
appropriate for staff or the Commission to be given direction to overturn or change the CACs
recommendation; and that when the recommendation come before the Planning Commission in
a Public Hearing, the Commission at that time, could choose to have a difference of opinion with
respect to the CACs recommendation.
Ms. Ubnoske also relayed that she will bring Mr. Kerner's concerns to the City Clerk's attention.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of October 6, 2004
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
R:\MinutesPC\ 100604
.
2.1 Approve the Minutes of Adjourned Regular Joint City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop of August 10, 2004
2.2 Approve the Minutes of August 18, 2004
2.3 Approve the Minutes of September 1, 2004
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve Items No. 2.2 and 2.3 and because lack of
quorum, roll over Item No. 2.1. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected approval with the exception of Commissioner's Mathewson and Olhasso who were
both ~. --;:-
New Item
3 Planninq Application No. PA04-0200. PA04-0201. PA04-0202. and PA04-0203. a
Development Plan. submitted bv John Clement of Venture Point. to construct a
neiqhborhood shoppinq center with eiqht commercial buildinqs totalinq 80.524 square feet
consistinq of 23.553 square feet of multiple use retail space. 18.722 square feet of multiple
use restaurant space. an 18.000 square foot qrocerv store. a 13. 217 square foot druq store.
and 7.032 square feet of multiple use professional office space. In coniunction. a Vestinq
Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide a 9.77 acre parcel into six (6) parcels. a Minor
Conditional Use Permit for a drive-thru pharmacv at the proposed druq store. and a Minor
Conditional Use Permit to allow for the sale of alcohol (Tvpe 21 license. off-sale qeneral\
from the proposed druq store and the proposed qrocerv store. located at the southeast
corner of Rancho California Road and Meadows Parkwav
.
Associate Planner Fisk presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
. That in May 2003, the City Council denied an application for the project site that was filed
by Venture Point for Community Commercial Shopping Center design Y"ith a 38,372
square foot grocery store
That the applicant has worked with staff to redesign the site to address design concerns
expressed by the City Council including reduction in the size of the market to make the
shopping center compatible with the with site Specific Plan and General Plan
designation of Neighborhood Commercial '
That the City Council expressed concern with the size of the grocery store; that the
loading spaces for the markèt were facing the residential properties on the hill; and that
the scale of the overall project would need to be reduced to a pedestrian scale to better
fit with the surrounding Neighborhood Commercial designation
That staff has worked with the applicant and neighboring community to achieve a variety
of project enhancements that will result in a project where the neighborhood commercial
scale; that the reduction in size of the market was the most essential change necessary
to establishing the project as a neighborhood commercial center; and that the application
is consistent with the Margariìa Village Specific Plan and General Plan and General Plan
designations of Neighborhood Commercial
.
R:\MinutesPC\100604
2
.
.
.
. That the loading facilities will be placed in the rear of the buildings where there will be
minimal activity
.
That a tree-shaded plaza area with a water feature was added to create an outdoor
eating area
That enhanced paving will be provided within the plaza area, such as stone veneer and
enhanced pre-cast concrete on portions of the facades of building E and F
. That pedestrian access will include a walkway placed along a tree-lined aisle that
extends from Rancho California Road to Meadows Parkway (in front of Buildings D thru
I) and a walkway leading from the plaza area to the front of Building B that is separated
from the parking area; that these walkways create an environment with safe and
convenient pedestrian interaction between businesses
. That staff is of the opinion that there is insufficient provisions of a base material for the
buildings throughout the site; and that staff also expressed concern regarding blank wall
spaces and the visibility of delivery doors at the rear of Buildings Band C from Meadows
Parkway; however, the applicant is of the opinion that there is adequate building features
and screening
. That staff has also expressed concern with the lack of landscaping in the front of the
grocery building (Building H); and requested an outdoor seating area to provide seating
for a deli planned within the grocery store; and that the applicant responded that
additional landscaping and outdoor seating would severely limit the function of the
grocery store
. That the sale of beer, wine, and distilled spirits requires that a CUP be obtained from the
Planning Commission; that Type 21 licènse, off-sale general is being proposed at the
drug-store and the proposed grocery store
. That the application is consistent with the Development Code and that the census tract
is not over concentrated with off-sale licenses so Public Convenience or Necessity
findings are not required
That an initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project wiÍl have potential
significant impacts unless mitigation measures are included as a Condition of Approval;
and that based on mitigation listed within the mitigation monitoring program for the
program for the project addressing aesthetics and noise, staff would recommend
adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project
That in conclusion, staff recommends that the proposed project is consistent with the
General Plan and conforms to the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP), the Development
Code, the Citywide Design Guidelines and the Temecula subdivision; therefore, staff
recommends that the Planning commission approve the proposed Development Code,
Vesting Tentative Parcel Map, and Minor CUP
R:\MinutesPC\100604
3
. That staff has some corrections and additions as follows:
a That page 40f the staff report should read: 1 space/300 square feet of gross
floor area versus 1 space/100; noting that the calculations for the proposed and
required parking spaces is correct
a That the Resolution for the alcohol CUP Section 2, delete verbiage: in regards to
criteria for Public Convenience or Necessity.
.
That staff distributed a memo to the Planning Commission requesting that a Condition of
Approval be added to the Development Plan (see memo)
That the Public Works Department requested that the two Conditions of Approval be
added to the Development Plan (see memo); noting that the Condition would limit the
access to the parcel as shown on the Development Plan
That Condition of Approval No. 31 of the Development Plan be revised to read: that
prior to occupancy of the first building permit, all perimeter landscaping must be installed
. That the applicant is requesting that Condition of approval No. 44 of the Vesting
Tentative Parcel Map be removed; and that because the proposed buildings do not
cross property lines and the property could be developed as proposed without
subdivision, both the Planning Department and Public Works Department agree that it
would be appropriate to remove the Condition of Approval.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Fisk relayed that other pedestrian uses would be reviewed by
the Planning Director as to whether or not they would be appropriate for the plaza.
.
Commissioner Chiniaeff queried if the City Attorney should comment.
In response to Commissioner's Chiniaeff's query, Mr. Fisk noted that staff encouraged the
applicant to add additional landscaping to the rear of Buildings of Band C but that the applicant
is of the opinion that no changes or addition of landscaping is necessary.
Via Overhead, Mr. Fisk, displayed elevations of the original proposed project.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. John Clement, of Venture Point Development,oÌfered the following comments:
That the applicant is satisfied with staff's Condition of Approval except for the use
changes (see memo) distributed by Mr. Fisk at the Planning Commission meeting
. That the proposed plaza will offer a pedestrian gathering for the public
. That there are other uses that are not listed on staff's memo such as a florist and card
shop and that Mr. Fisk's list is not conclusive.
.
R:\MinutesPC\ 100604
4
.
.
.
Mr. Richard Sallis, attorney representing the applicant, offered the following:
. That the applicant would be opposed to the additional Conditions beyond what the
existing code requires as it relates to this portion of the property
. That the proposed project conforms to the Specific Plan (SP) and General Plan; that
there are within the uses that are allowed and would not like to further limit it.
Commissioner Chiniaeff queried on what types of material would be used for the bottom portion
of the buildings.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Clement noted that the applicant will be using materials that
will be harmonious to Wine Country; that there will be a blend of pre-cast materials, stone
materials, and brick materials; that on the elevations there would be full height base materials
on building F and wrapping around E and G.
Mr. Brian Wolfe, architect for the project, offered the following comments:
. That dynamic elements have been incorporated to the street elevation of Buildings B
and C
. That the lower 3 feet of Building Band C will be of pilaster; and that there will be a shrub
hedge that will grow 3 to 4 feet tall along the building
. That durable materials will be applied to the buildings
That column bases in front of the market will be of pre-cast; and that the wall will be
protected by a concrete curb element
. That there will not be pre-cast materials along the entire front of the shopping store, only
on the columns and pilasters where the shopping carts will be stored
. That there will be architectural integrated lighting, decorative scones, and wall packs
which are needed for security lighting
Commissioner Guerriero queried if awnings and other materials would be incorporated on the
street side of Buildings A west elevation and I north elevation, other than stucco.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Wolfe responded that landscaping will be incorporated at
those elevations to provide screening.
Mr. John Wieneke, representing the applicant, offered the following information:
That there will be a 20 foot setback of landscaping that is very thick
. That the monument sign is a blockade which is made of a soft edge meant to isolate
building A entirely
R:\MinutesPC\ 100604
5
That building A is architecturally detailed and has nice looking edges; and that this will
be a non-pedestrian area and that because of the grade difference, one would need to
go out of their way to see it
.
For Chairman Telesio, Mr. Weineke relayed that the applicant spent a tremendous amount of
time looking for a fountain that would be proportional to the center; and the amount of trees that
are being proposed is what staff required; and that the applicant is of the opinion that the
proposed water fountain would be the correct size for the center.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Weineke relayed that precautions have been taken to prevent
skateboarding.
For Mr. Madden, Mr. Clement noted that the applicant would expect to begin construction in the
beginning of the New Year and noted that the entire length of the project will be in 15 months;
and that the applicant will be moving expeditiously as possible through the process.
Mr. Tony Harris, Temecula resident noted this appreciation for the proposed center but
expressed concern with the two slopes and queried on what types of tress would be added.
Mr. Clement relayed that the applicant is willing to maintain the slope or let the HOA maintain it;
and that the applicant will leave the decision to the HOA.
Mr. John Wieneke offered the following comments:
. That the declining rosemary on the slope will be removed
.
That the acacia shrubs will be removed and replaced with new acacia shrubs will be
replaced
. That liquid amber, pepper trees, and afghan pine trees will be planted
That larger trees will be added at the bottom of the slope
That all landscape standards have been met
. That the applicant is willing to work with the HOA to satisfy any concerns of adjacent
homeowners in regard to the slope
That the applicant hired a specialty lighting consultant to design the lighting fixtures; and
that all the lights will be directional and will be focused toward the center; and also
advised that the lights will be set on timers
. That construction hours will adhere to the City hours
. That an emergency contact number will be posted to address any type of violation
Commissioner Chiniaeff queried on the hours of trash pick-up.
Ms. Ubnoske relayed that staff will ensure that the contractor will have the trash hauler pick up
trash during reasonable hours.
.
R:\MinutesPC\100604
6
.
.
.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Wieneke noted that to date, no leases for restaurants have
been signed but that the applicant has been actively marketing and currently has 18 letters of
intent; and that the applicant will be encouraging a harmonious blend of tenants.
For the Commission, Deputy of Public Works Parks noted that if delivery trucks are entering into
the residential area, the Public Works Department will address the situation.
For the Planning Commission, Mr. Markham relayed that Mr. Dodson would be available to
answer any concerns in regard to air quality.
Mr. Dodson noted that if smoke odors were to become a nuisance, the public would be able to
address their concerns to the South coast Air Quality District, who would intern help to resolve
the problem.
For Commissioner Guerriero, Mr. Parks relayed that the landscape median will be completed in
conjunction with the proposed project.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested changing the language in the memo distributed by Mr. Fisk
regarding the uses to read: that other pedestrian oriented uses appropriate for the plaza area if
reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to occupancy, (preferably prior to
leasing).
For Commissioner's Chiniaeff and Guerriero, Ms. Ubnoske relayed that the applicant will need
to return to the Planning Commission with a sign program.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that the applicant add a screen over the back doors of the
buildings and that the applicant work closely with the HOA in regard to maintenance of the
slope.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the proposed project subject to the
conditions listed in staff's report, including the uses listed in the memo but adding that: portions
of the buildings that front the plaza area, shall be uses as determined to be appropriate by the
Director of Planning; that all subsequent changes of uses shall be approved by the Director of
Planning. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with
the exception of Commissioner's Mathewson and Olhasso who were both absent.
COMMISSIONER'S REPORT
No reports at this time.
PLANNING DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Ms. Ubnoske advised the Planning Commission that the list of qualifications for the architect
position was released and that interviews will begin November, 10, 2004 and requested two
Commissioners to assist in the interview panel.
Ms. Ubnoske also noted that staff will be meeting with the staff of the upcoming hospital to
discuss architectural design, and requested two Commissioners to sit in the design review.
R:IMinutesPC\ 100604
7
For Ms. Ubnoske, the Planning Commissioners relayed that they will check their calendars and
get back to her. .
ADJOURNMENT
At 7:45 p.m., Chairman Telesio formally adjourned this meeting to next regular meeting to be
held on Wednesday. October 20. 2004.
John Telesio
Chairman
Debbie Ubnoske
Director of Planning
R:\MinutesPC\ 100604
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
CALL TO ORDER
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
OCTOBER 20, 2004
The City of Temecula Planning Commission convened in a regular meeting at 6:00 P.M., on
Wednesday, October 20, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200
Business Park Drive, Temecula, California.
ALLEGIANCE
Commissioner Chiniaeff led the audience in the Flag salute.
ROLL CALL
Present:
Commissioners Chiniaeff Guerriero, Mathewson, Olhasso, and Chairman
Telesio.
Absent:
None.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1 Aqenda
RECOMMENDATION:
1.1 Approve the Agenda of October 20, 2004
2 Minutes
RECOMMENDATION:
2.1 Approve the Minutes of Adjourned Regular Joint City Council/Planning Commission
Workshop of August 10, 2004 (Continued from October 6, 2004)
3 Director's Hearinq Case Update
RECOMMENDATION:
3.1 Approve the Director's Hearing Case Update for September 2004
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve the Consent Calendar. Commissioner
Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected approval with the exception of
Commissioner Guerriero who abstained from Item No. 2.1.
R:\MinutesPC\ 1 02004
COMMISSION BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS
.
New Items
4 Planninq Application No. PA04-0149 a Development Plan. submitted bY Thomas Fanale. to
construct a 13.716 square foot industrial warehouse and office buildinq. located at 42103
Rio Nedo
Assistant Planner Damko presented a staff report (of record), noting the following:
That staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with
the City's General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards,
guidelines, and policies
. That staff recommends approval of the Development Plan with the attached Conditions
of Approval.
At this time, the public hearing was opened and due to no speakers it was closed.
MOTION: Commissioner Guerriero moved to approve staff's recommendation. Commissioner
Mathewson seconded the motion and voice vote reflected unanimous approval.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-054
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0149, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT A
13,716 SQAURE FOOT INDUSTRIAL AND OFFIE BUILDING
ON 0.90 ACRES LOCATED AT 42103 RIO NEDO, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 909-252-009
.
5 ApDlication No. PA04-0456 a Development Plan. submitted bv Kate Salvesen. to construct a
15.000 square foot buildinq for La-Z-Bov on .94 acres in the Power Center II Shoppinq
Center. located west of Marqarita Road at the northeast corner of North General Kearnv
That the application is for a vacant pad at the Power Center II site; and that La-Z-Boy is
proposing a Development Plan at this location
. That staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been
addressed and that the applicant concurs with the Conditions of Approval.
For Commissioner Mathewson, Mr. Hazen relayed that the project will provide 29 parking
spaces onsite; however, 30 spaces are required; that one (1) additional parking spot can be
provided through the reciprocal parking agreement, which was established as part of the
approval for Phase II of the Power Center.
.
R:\MinutesPC\ 102004
2
.
.
.
For Commissioner Chiniaeff, Mr. Hazen noted that the La-Z-Boy facility would be a showroom
only and that there would not be any delivery of furniture out of this facility and would be willing
to add this as a Condition of Approval.
At this time, the Public Hearing was opened.
Mr. Michael Karate, representing the applicant Kate Salvessen, noted the following:
. That most of the deliveries are for gallery show room purposes; however, some
customers will be able to pick-up their furniture from the site but will not be unpacking
any furniture.
. That the whole Development of the Power Center II was parked on a 10:10000 ratio; and
that if every building were to become a restaurant, it would be in fact meet that
requirement
. That the applicant is in agreement of the Conditions of Approval but would request to
change the color of the awning from green to blue.
Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Jack Tarr, made the following comments:
. That the Planning Commission support the applicant's request for the color change of
the awning
. That the Condition of Approval relating to Development Impact Fees, TUMPF, and Art in
Public Places Ordinance which was enacted after the Development Agreement was
taken, is a concern and would request that the fees not apply.
For Mr. Fagan, Assistant City Attorney Curley noted that because he has not read the
document, a condition could be added that states: that to the extent permitted by the
Development Agreement, any current fees will be paid; and that if in review the DA prohibits
them, they will not be imposed.
At this time, the Public Hearing was closed.
Commissioner Chiniaeff suggested that the item be continued to allow the City Attorney to
review the document.
Mr. Curley responded that he would be satisfied by adding a condition indicating that any fees ~
are due and payable under the DA will be charged.
MOTION: Commissioner Chiniaeff moved to approve staff's recommendation subject to the
condition that states that any fees are due and payable under the DA will be charged; that any
trash created by La-Z-Boy be hauled away immediately and the color change request from
green to blue be honored. Commissioner Guerriero seconded the motion and voice vote
reflected unanimous approval.
R:\MinutesPC\ 102004
3
.
ITEM #3
.
.
.
.
8
Date of Meeting:
STAFF REPORT- PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5,2005
Title:
Associate Planner
Prepared by:
Cheryl Kitzerow
Application Type:
Development Plan and
Tentativè Tract Map
File Number
PA04-0134 and
PA04-0136
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CECA:
(Check One)
PA04-0134 is a request for a Development Plan to construct two, multi-
tenant industrial buildings on 8.5 acres. Building A is 73,148 square
feet. Building B is 55,785 square feet. PA04-0136 is a request for
Tentative Tract Map No. 32113 to create 27 industrial condominium
units in Building A and 17 industrial condominium units in Building B,
ranging in size from 2,066 square feet to 4,143 square feet. The project
site is located on the north side of Remington Avenue and south side of
Dendy Road, between Diaz Road and Winchester Road in the City of
Temecula. (Assessor's Parcel Number 909-370-037)
¡:g¡ Approve with Conditions
0 Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
0 Recommend Approval with Conditions
0 Recommend Denial
0 Categorically Exempt
(Class)
0 Notice of Determination
(Section)
0 Negative Declaration
¡:g¡ Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
DEIR
R,\D P\2004I04-0134 CBC Business CenteñSTAFF REPORT,doc
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
.
Applicant:
Matthew Fagan
Completion Date:
March 1, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
January 5,2005
General Plan Designation:
Business Park (BP)
Zoning Designation:
Light Industrial (LI)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant, previously graded
North:
South:
East:
West:
Vacant industrial land
Existing industrial buildings
Vacant land and existing buildings
Existing Scott's building
Lot Area:
8.56 acres net
Total Floor Area/Ratio
128,933 SF 1.345%
.
Landscape Area/Coverage
83,435 SF! 22%
Parking Required/Provided
270 spaces / 265 spaces provided (credits used for provision of
bicycle and motorcycle spaces)
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
~1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
An application for a Development Plan and Tentative Tract Map (Condominium Map) were
submitted on March 1, 2004. A DRC meeting was held on May 20, 2004 to discuss site,
landscaping, architecture and other departmental issues. On June 29, 2004 and August 23,
2004 the applicant submitted revised plans. On November 12, 2004, staff received approval from
the Riverside County Geologist regarding the adequacy of the geotechnical reports prepared by
the applicant.
.
R:\D 1'\2004\04-0\34 CBC Business Ceule>\STAFF REPORTdoc
.
.
.
ANALYSIS
Site Plan
The project conforms to the development regulations of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.
The building setbacks exceed the minimum requirements of the Development Code and the
0.345 Floor Area Ratio is below the target ratio of 0.40 for this zoning district. The proposed 35
percent lot coverage is also below the maximum permitted lot coverage of 40 percent. The
proposed site plan provides adequate circulation for vehicles anticipated to utilize the site, as
well as for emergency vehicles.
Architecture
The proposed building is consistent with the Development Code and Design Guidelines. The
building will be constructed of concrete tilt-up panels, with architectural enhancements to include
glass accents, horizontal reveals and varied base and accent colors which provide visual
interest. The buildings include various breaks in the wall planes and parapet design and height,
which, in conjunction with landscaping, breaks up building mass from the street view. Staff
supports the building design since the variation in building height and materials enhance the
appearance of the buildings which may be visible from other areas of the business park.
Landscapinq
The landscape plan conforms to the landscape requirements of the Development Code and
Design Guidelines. Tree and shrub placement will serve to effectively screen on site parking
areas and effectively soften building elevations. The project proposes to landscape 83,435
square feet or 22 percent of the site, which exceeds the minimum 20 percent landscaping
requirements in the LI (Light Industrial) zone. There is an existing 2:1 slope along the south and
east property lines. Existing landscaping will be protected in place and meets the City's
Landscape Ordinance requirements. Large 36-inch box Red Crepe Myrtles are proposed at the
project entries off Remington Avenue and Dendy Road as enhanced entry statements. In
addition to proposed landscaping around the perimeter of the site, the proposal also includes
varied landscape setbacks around the building footprint. Two outdoor employee eating areas are
proposed for the site. These areas are proposed at the easterly property lines of the site, which
are higher than the adjacent property and Remington Avenue, providing the opportunity for
views. These areas include covered eating areas with picnic tables. The project has been
conditioned to provide details of this area to include vines along the shade structures.
Access. Circulation and Parkinq
Access to the proposed building will be provided from a 26-foot wide drive aisle off Remington
Avenue .and one off Dendy Road, along the southern and northern street frontages for the
project site. This configuration allows for access around both proposed buildings, providing
adequate on-site circulation. The project provides 265 vehicle parking spaces which is below
the 270 vehicle spaces required, however five parking space credits are being requested for the
provision of 12 motorcycle spaces (3 vehicle space credits) and 20 bicycle spaces (2 vehicle
space credits) which exceed the requirements of the Development Code. In addition, 40 loading
spaces are provided throughout the site, in proximity to the building entrances, thereby meeting
the loading space requirements of Section 17.24.060 of the Development Code.
R:ID 1'12004\04-0134 CBC Business Center\STAFF REPORT,doc
The Public Works Department has analyzed the projected traffic impact of the project and has
determined that the impacts are consistent with the traffic volumes projected for the site by the
previously approved City General Plan EIR. The Fire Department also reviewed the plan and
determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide emergency services to the site.
Tentative Tract Map
.
The proposed Tentative Tract Map meets the requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance and the
Development Code for condominiums. Each unit will consist of the suite area, plus the common
area. All off-site improvements in the area exist and will be adequate to serve the proposed
project.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
I:8J 1.
An initial study has been prepared and indicates that the project will have the following
potential significant environmental impacts unless mitigation measures are included as
conditions of approval. Based on the following mitigation, staff recommends adoption of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project.
The proposed project potentially
expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant concentration and could
potentially create objectionable odors
affecting a substantial number of people
working in the nearby area.
Directly or indirectly destroying any unique
paleontological or archaeological
resources.
R:ID P\20O41O4-0134 CBC Business CeuterlSTAFF REPORT.doc
Prior to the issuance of a permit, the
applicant shall verify that moving and
large equipment are properly tuned and
maintained to reduce emissions. In addition,
alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used
where feasible. Construction equipment should be
selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency.
.
Electrical and/or diesel-powered equipment should
be utilized in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines.
During construction and grading phases, the
project site shall be watered down in the morning
before grading and/or construction begins and in
the evening once construction and/or grading is
complete for the day. The project site shall be
watered down no less than 3 times (not including
the morning and evening water-down) during
construction and/or grading activities to reduce
dust.
All fill being transported to and/or from the site
shall be covered and the wheels and lower portion
of transport trucks shall be sprayed with water to
reduce/eliminate soil from the trucks before they
leave the construction area.
The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction
agreement/treatment plan with the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians, rior to the issuance of
.
.
.
Expose people or structures to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the
risk of loss, injury, or death involving
rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake
Fault Zoning Map.
Unstable soil conditions from excavation,
grading or fill.
.
R:ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centcr\STAFF REPORT-due
grading permits, that sets forth and contains the
terms and conditions for the treatment of
discoveries of Native American cultural resources.
The agreement /treatment plan shall contain
provisions for the treatment of all Native American
cultural items, artifacts, and Native American
human remains that may be uncovered during the
project. The agreement! treatment plan may allow
for the presence of Pechanga tribal monitors
during any ground-disturbing activities.
The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to
relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archeological artifacts, that are found
on the Project area to the Pechanga Band of
Luiseño Indians for proper treatment and
disposition.
Prior to any ground disturbance activities a
qualified archaeological monitor will be present
and will have the authority to stop and redirect
grading activities, in consultation with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and their
designated monitors, to evaluate the significance
of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property.
If any human remains are encountered on the
project site, all ground disturbing activities in the
vicinity of the discovery will be terminated
immediately and the County Coroner's office and
the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and
Miranda, Tomaras, Ogas & Wengler, LLP will be
contacted to arrange for the treatment of such
remains.
Habitable structures shall be constructed outside
the 120-foot "restricted use zone" of the main fault
trace which lies along the western edge of Parcel
1, and development shall occur in accordance with
the recommendations set forth in the EnGEN
Corporation studies referenced in Initial Study. In
addition, proposed project will be conditioned to
utilize construction techniques that are consistent
with the California Buildinq Code.
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil
Engineer shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works with the initial grading plan check
and development shall occur in accordance with
the recommendations set forth in the soils report
and the EnGEN Corporation studies referenced in
Initial Study.
Exposure of people or property to seismic Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
ground shaking, seismic ground failure,
landslides or mudflows, expansive soils or
earthquake hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent
with the Uniform Building Code.
.
CO NCLUSION/RECOM M EN DA nON
Staff has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the City's
General Plan, Development Code, and all applicable ordinances, standards, guidelines, and
policies. Therefore, staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve Development
Plan PA04-0136 and Tentative Tract Map No. 32113 PA04-0134, based upon the findings and
with the attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Development Plan
(Code Section 17.05.01 OF)
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and
office, as typical uses in the Business Park designation. The Land Use Element of the
General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing buildings. The
proposed industrial buildings have been designed to be compatible with the surrounding
buildings currently located adjacent to the subject site. In addition, the proposal is
consistent with the development regulations of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.
.
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety, and general welfare.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that
the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public
health, safety and welfare.
Tentative Tract Map
(Code Section 16.09.1400
1.
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code;
.
R:\D 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlSTAFF REPORTdoc
.
.
.
The proposed subdivision is a Tentative Tract Map for industrial condominiums and is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code because the proposed Tentative Tract Map complies
with the development standards and will function as a typical single lot with individual
owners of each building suite.
2.
The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a
Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will
not be too small to sustain their agricultural use;
The project site is not subject to any agreements entered into pursuant to the California
Land ConseNation Act of 1965, because the project site is not within an area requiring
conseNation nor is the land or surrounding land used for agricultural purposes.
3.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map;
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Tract Map because the project site will function as a single lot,
which allows for, required access, circulation and improvements, however the individual
industrial condominium units will be individually owned.
4.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are:
5.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the project conforms with the
adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and all required mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the conditions of approval.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems;
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems because development will be inspected by City Staff prior
to occupancy to ensure all improvements are constructed in a manner consistent with
City of Temecula standards.
6.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible;
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible, because the construction plans will
comply with all applicable building codes and State energy guidelines.
7.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided;
R:ID 1'\2004\04-0134 CBC Business CenteñSTAFF REPORT,doc
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided
because required off-site dedications and improvements have been provided or will be
acquired as conditions of approval.
8.
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby);
Industrial subdivisions are not required to dedicate parkland or fees/requirements
(Quimby), therefore the project is consistent with the City's Parkland dedication
requirements.
ATTACHMENTS
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 9
PC Resolution No. 2005-- Development Plan - Blue Page 10
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
2.
3.
PC Resolution No. 2005-- Tentative Tract Map - Blue Page 11
Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval
Initial Study and Mitigation Monitoring Program - Blue Page 12
4.
R:ID P\20O4\O4-0\34 CBC Business CenterlSTAFFREPORT,doc
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R,ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CentcrlSTAFF REPORTdnc
I ¡¡!!!I;
6;Ø ,. ,
, ,
N I, ¡
::::::, ¡¡ rt¡
1",," i 'I I:: ¡ ,i
Ii" ij I, '. 'i!
i:m il!lI! BW
III
in
" "
¡¡¡¡
~ I
~ lid
~dH
':.---
~è~---~-~~~-~-~-~-
--_.3i-------_.-!:-;~~~;-AVE.
i
~~ ¡j
°B¡P'
~ e¡?" II
i~m¡
dU!!
"'n'¡
!
,
,
i
z ...J
:3 :;!;
a.. a:
~b5
F =>
z 0
:3 ;¡:;
a.. 0
1I: «
« 0
~ a:
:J >-
w 0
a: Z
a.. ill
0
¡' I,.,
I': Ii::
I¡'!! I,!!
P!II!!;~
,ii, ili Ii
II i,il!! I-I:I
~ "~'I ~! ~!,
,I
II
I'
,I
!¡
!'/
!!í¡
.,--,-,..- ---
~I ~,.
! . . . D~ E) I'
':!lldld,~ 1,li
! I., ! II
:1 ¡"! 1.1'
., , Ii .' h..
". ' !Iii
I~! IF '. ":0 '.' ¡Iii! I
'I ,.' "!' ! ..
II Ij: ¡!- II
'" ;1 I îj a.' ,
, i', I' Ii' ,
¡'I' ¡ ! ";1 ¡ § !I I ~
¡¡IIII..I!!¡ !i,!, ,¡jd
. ,¡ ,1 ,,' i . - ~ ¡ . ¡ I . I
II ,,~¡, ¡! ~. , II'
01' ~¡ -I:'~' ¡: i I . '.I
Idi~Llii ""I!
i
l~
._-~--- .
a:
LU
....
Z
~ !
LU j
¡;¡ ,¡
5 "',
0"'. ¡'1:1
1'"
~ ¡¡In
1 II.
t;~
w..:
~ ¡¡~
~ §§
<I: 5:2
>- ~~
W go
u...-
0:: I"~
~ ~[£
c ~:g
æ ~i
:;¡ ;J;..:
<I: !!Ii';
.,~
9
Q
..,
J'
~
Iii
..J
c(
(,)
en
~I
~I
en
~
.
---~~----~~--~-~-
~T1 'S<XNX) """""'"
l'V1WSf1CH OVOO A<J'BCI ~
z
j
..
~
¡ ~
i ~
- ~
~ I
cr: .
.. i
i
¡
i
.
¡
i
I
i
i
I
I
I m~~ ....'" ! 1~ ' I
I
¡
i
i
I
¡
I
,
J
I
I
i
I
.
¡
I
i
I
;
I
i
I
,
¡
¡
i
I
i
I
¡
i
I
I
i
!
I, j"
" !
!I !""I
~,,~q I 'I
I ¡ :¡ I;; i,!
, "l. II!
mil !jl¡i! Iii"
::~!! III! I! ~!!;!
I""
I'
~I.
II:
, n.
¡ II
" "
" "
1m
~ I
i Iii I
¡dll
ì ;
i ¡:
mil: i!
¡¡i¡i ¡¡iml ! d
¡ mil ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ I ~í
I "'~, "¡!!Ii ' ii
'II !.¡!
1'.11..
,Iii ,!1
'¡" 'I'
I¡q¡::
1!:I¡¡ilj
'j!:IIII:I¡I¡
íI ~. ~I ~. ~.'
':----
-,-,/-;;:;,/ / /v///
---~------ re~~'~
,I
Ii
I'
I'
!
!,¡
'¡h
.
.
.
.
I 9 e e
i . Ii, i
~ PI I ¡
II! I! I ¡
e 8
'(
.
F
;
.
...."
us
~h
::c ill:
u ~~
~ ~~I
!Ii! ~~ I
S iI~1
llil ~
Wh
~J
lee e
~~ . I ¡ . i
. ¡ ¡ I!
: I II! ! I
e e
¡~
¡[
Ii
.
c:::
W
::....
:z
w
(.)
en
en
W a
:z ~ :-"
~ ~~ ¡¡i
::»~; 8~
- .~gxe
...... ~~a~~
~¡:,;,~
(.) ~~~=~
m ~~¡!~~
(.) ~~~~~
I-~
U&I
W ~r-
I-~¡g
- ~O>
::J: " or>
U gJ::::
0::: ~ ¡g
« ~....i
>- en ¡¡j
W ~C,)
LL Wr-
0::: Iñ ¡g
::) ci~
C ~~
U)æ:g
WC:;u.:
::æ¡: ~~
«or>
..,g¡
.
.
.
.
.
19Ç6 ç¿¿ agg .113~ 1956 açjo 95a .0,0
~m6 '011\1:) 'OÐ310 NYS VtH 3lS 'O~ ~I~ YS3~ çaa6 ¿
H3.1N3:> SS3NSlnB :>B:> 1~31IH~~V A3:1~nO S3WVr ~
-------~-r-~--~-- -;I ~ 0'
I ¡ I ï1
, I~.
~ I IU"rrtg
§ i , / .!J:
III &~
'I ; I, Ii Ixldh
I ¡ I,.~ I'~~. . '100; II
¡i= II[ ~
I~ c_- ~ .J
I>
!~
iw
I.
I~ ~
II- Jï
, I ~
19L ~..~~ I ig~ :-(h f - ~= "--;
l_- '~ ~ II'E§~~ \jl ~-"- II
, I
~t I '
II
I .
!~
mmillJ
~;;s~~
------
,~,
,
:~~~~!i .
+'
OJ
OJU)
{i<C
~t
I I
~
t
I
)1
m~
l~1
BUilDING A FLOOR PLAN
@~
SCALE: 1/16"=1'.0"
.
9885 MESA RIM
OFF,858
E 104 SAN OIEGO. CALIF. 92121
CELL 858 775 9567
~,
"'~...,~~
,»".oo.~~...
~"'~.-
,~""'~,,~~-,~
.
I~I » ~
¿ W~
'" <+
JAMES DURFEY ARCHITECT
CBC BUISNESS CENTER
E
S
.
SU"..,
EU""" u"...~", EU", "
',"'-"E.,", ~.""'EQ
EU""'" EU"'"
'."""~", ...... E., ", EUIT"'"
"".~",
100
.---------.
.
.
.
~~L~~~16~=?o"B FLOOR PLAN g",
.
CBC BUISNESS CENTER
""~~=
'm__."
-"'~,-
JAMES DURFEY ARCHITECT
9885 MESA RIM RO, STE 104 SAN OIEGO, CAUF. 92121
OFF,8584589567 CElL.8567759587
C')
.,..
.,.. ~
C\lz
(t)~
.IL
00
zul
>
a.W
<°
~!
z
I-:i
00
<~
0::0
1-° Ii
W 3! õilil
>0: hi!
-~ I
I-tD d
<g
1-3!'i
z
W
....
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.2
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005--
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
RID 1'12004\04-0134 CBC Business CenterlSTAFF REPORTdoc
10
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0134, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT
TWO MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS TOTALING 128,933
SQUARE FEET ON 8,5 ACRES IN THE LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
ZONE, LOCATED ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF REMINGTON
AVENUE AND SOUTH SIDE OF DENDY ROAD, BETWEEN
DIAZ ROAD AND WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS
ASSESSOR PARCEL NO. 909-370-037,
WHEREAS, Matthew Fagan filed Planning Application No. PA04-0134 (Development
Plan Application), in a manner in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on January 5, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission approved the Application subject to and based upon the findings
set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findinqs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the
Application, hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.05.010F of the
Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with
all applicable requirements of state law and other ordinances of the city.
The proposal is consistent with the land use designation and policies reflected for
Business Park (BP) development in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General
Plan has listed the proposed uses, including the light manufacturing, warehouse, and
office, as typical uses in the Business Park designation. The Land Use Element of the
General Plan requires that proposed buildings be compatible with existing 'buildings.
The proposed office building has been designed to be compatible with the surrounding
buildings currently located adjacent to the subject site. In addition, the proposal is
consistent with the development regulations of the Light Industrial (LI) zoning district.
R,ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Conditions.doc
I
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public
health, safety, and general welfare.
.
The proposed project is consistent with the development standards outlined in the City of
Temecula Development Code. The proposed architecture and site layout for the project
has been reviewed utilizing the Industrial Development Performance Standards of the
Development Code. The proposed project has met the performance standards in
regards to circulation, architectural design and site plan design.
The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent
with, all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure
that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the
public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to California Environmental Quality
Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study of the
potential environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings contained in
that Study, City staff determined that there was no.substantial evidence that the project could
have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temecula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application PA04-0134, a request to construct, operate and establish two
multi-tenant industrial building totaling 128,933 square feet on 8.5 acres with conditions of
approval as set forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, imd incorporated herein by this reference
together with any and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 5th day of January 2005.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
.
RID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Cnnditions,dnc
2
.
.
.
STATE OF.CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission: .
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
R,ID 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Cnnditions.dnc
3
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN
R:ID 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlDP Draft PC Conditions,doc
4
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA03-0134
Project Description:
A Development Plan to design and construct two,
single-story multi-tenant industrial buildings totaling
approximately 128,933 square feet on 8.5 acres.
Building A is 73,148 square feet and Building EJ is
55,785 square feet. The project site is located on the
north side of Remington Avenue and south side of
Dendy Road, between Diaz Road and Winchester
Road,
DlF Category:
MSHCP Category:
Business Parkllndustrial
Business Parkllndustrial
TUMF Category:
Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No.:
909-370-037
Approval Date:
January 5, 2005
January 5, 2007
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The' applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars
($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination
for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section
21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition, Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c).
General Requirements
1.
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend with Legal Counsel of the City's own
selection, the City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency
or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees,
consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents from any and all claims, actions,
awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, void, annul,
seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of
and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency,
appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City,
R:\D P\2004\04-0134 CBC Business CenteIlDP Thaft PC Conditions.doc
5
concerning the Planning Application. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and
landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and
shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves its right to
take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its
citizens in regards to such defense.
.
3.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this development plan.
4.
The applicant shall comply with the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Planning
Application No. PA04-0134.
5.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
6.
The Director of Planning may, upon an application being filed within thirty days prior to
expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to three one-year
extensions of time, one year at a time.
7.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan
and elevations contained on file with the Planning Department, with the following
revision:
.
a.
Site Plan shall be revised to maintain consistency with the Grading Plan - please
eliminate duplicative ADA access ramp illustrated within curb line access at
Dendy Road.
8.
The condition of approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items,
materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be
deemed satisfied by staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material,
equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent
of that required by the condition of approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to
substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the
regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision.
Material
Concrete Colors (Base)
Color
Oyster - Dunn Edwards SP511
Stonish Beige - Dunn Edwards 68
Sunset Cove - Dunn Edwards SP2480
Concrete Colors (Accent)
Tamborlane - Dunn-Edwards SP161
Village Blue - Dunn Edwards SP39
Reflective Blue
Glass
9.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
.
R:ID 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business Centeno? Draft PC Conditions.due
, 6
.
.
.
10.
11.
12.
to. bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
All mechanical and roof equipment shall be fully screened from public view by being
placed below the surrounding parapet wall.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X
10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and the
colored architectural elevations. All labels on the Color and Materials Board and
Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall verify that all earth moving
and large equipment are properly tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In addition,
alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used where feasible. Construction equipment
should be selected considering emission factors and energy efficiency.(Mitigation
Measure)
Electrical and/or diesel-powered equipment should be utilized in-lieu of gasoline-
powered engines. Documentation confirming the equipment type shall be submitted to
the Planning Department. (Mitigation Measure)
During construction and grading phases, the project site shall be watered down in the
morning before grading and/or construction begins and in the evening once construction
and/or grading is complete for the day. The project site shall be watered down no less
than 3 times (not including the morning and evening water-down) during construction
and/or grading activities to reduce dust.(Mitigation Measure)
All fill being transported to and/or from the site shall be covered and the wheels and
lower portion of transport trucks shall be sprayed with water to reduce/eliminate soil from
the trucks before they leave the construction area.(Mitigation Measure)
The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction agreemenVtreatment plan with the
Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians, prior to the issuance of grading permits, that sets
forth and contains the terms and conditions for the treatment of discoveries of Native
American cultural resources. The agreement /treatment plan shall contain provisions for
the treatment of all Native American cultural items, artifacts, and Native American
human remains that may be uncovered during the project. The agreemenV treatment
plan may allow for the presence of Pechanga tribal monitors during any ground,
disturbing activities.(Mitigation Measure)
The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources,
including all archeological artifacts, that are found on the Project area to the Pechanga
Band of Luiseño Indians for proper treatment and disposition.(Mitigation Measure)
RID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Conditions,doc
7
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
.26.
Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified archaeological monitor will be
present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation
with the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate
the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.(Mitigation
Measure)
.
If any human remains are encountered on the project site, all ground disturbing activities
in the vicinity of the discovery will be terminated immediately and the County Coroner's
office and the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians and Miranda, Tomaras, Ogas &
Wengler, LLP will be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains. (Mitigation
Measure) ~
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check and development shall
occur in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the soils report and the
EnGEN Corporation studies referenced in Initial Study.(Mitigation Measure)
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall be submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. A registered Civil
Engineer shall certify building pads.(Mitigation Measure)
Provide the Planning Department with a copy of the underground water plans and
electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector
check prior to final agreement with the utility companies.
The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot to the Planning
Department, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Palomar
Lighting Ordinance. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to
not adversely impact the growth potential of the parking lot trees.
.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth. in that
Ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid.
The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If at any time
during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any
artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or
archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the
City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the
affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Planning at his/her sole discretion
may require the property to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to
allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to
inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find.
Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeologicaVcultural resource, the
Director of Planning shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall
authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an
archaeological/cultural resource, the Director of Planning shall notify the property owner
that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other
corrective measures have been approved by the Director of Planning."
.
R,ID P\20O41O4-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Conditions.dnc
8
.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
27.
28.
29.
30.
.
31.
.
Habitable structures shall be constructed outside the 120-foot "restricted use zone" of
the main fault trace which lies along the western edge of Parcel 1, and development
shall occur in accordance with the recommendations set forth in the EnGEN Corporation
studies referenced in Initial Study. In addition, proposed project will be conditioned to
utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the California Building
Code.(Mitigation Measure)
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the Uniform Building
Code.(Mitigation Measure)
A separate building permit shall be required for all signage.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform to the approved
conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number,
genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be
consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The plans shall be accompanied by the
following items:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of
submittal).
Provide a minimum five foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all
parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area.
Provide an agronomic soils report with the construction landscape plans.
Detail of outdoor employee eating area. This area shall include a trellis with
appropriate vines to shade the outdoor employee break area, decorative furniture
and hardscape to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the
Planning Director.
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan).
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval, which details
the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth
and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The
approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance
contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not
to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
RID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business Cente<\DP O",ft PC Conditions.doc
9
32.
33.
Building plans shall indicate that all roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange".
The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing
plotted on a 9-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced 9-inches apart. The
numerals shall be painted with a standard 9-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow
paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street
and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street.
Prior to Building Occupancy
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with
the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of
Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The
irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plan shall be filed with the Planning Department for
one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and
irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant.
Each parking space reserved for the handicapped shall be identified by a permanently
affixed reflectorized sign constructed of porcelain on steel, beaded text or equal,
displaying the International Symbol of Accessibility. The sign shall not be smaller than
70 square inches in area and shall be centered at the interior end of the parking space at
a minimum height of 80 inches from the bottom of the sign to the parking space finished
grade, or centered at a minimum height of 36 inches from the parking space finished
grade, ground, or sidewalk. A sign shall also be posted in a conspicuous place, at each
entrance to the off-street parking facility, not less than 17 inches by 22 inches, clearly
and conspicuously stating the following:
"Unauthorized vehicles parked in designated accessible spaces not displaying
distinguishing placards or license plates issued for persons with disabilities may be
towed away at owner's expense. Towed vehicles may be reclaimed by telephoning 909
696-3000."
In addition to the above requirements, the surface of each parking place shall have a
surface identification sign duplicating the Symbol of Accessibility in blue paint of at least
3 square feet in size.
All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use
allowed by this permit.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
Unless otherwise noted, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any
Government Agency. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the site plan all
existing and proposed property lines, easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and
drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further
review and revision.
R,I!) 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Couditinns.doc
10
.
.
.
.
.
.
41.
43.
44.
45.
46.
47.
General Requirements
39. A Grading Permit for precise grading, including all on-site flat work and improvements,
shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any
construction outside of the City-maintained street right-of-way.
40.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit
42.
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and shall be reviewed
and approved by the Department of Public Works. The grading plan shall include all
necessary erosion control measures needed to adequately protect adjacent public and
private property.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A Soil Report shall be prepared by a registered Soil or Civil Engineer and submitted to
the Director of the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and pavement sections.
A Geological Report shall be prepared by a qualified engineer or geologist and
submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The
report shall address special study zones and the geological conditions of the site, and
shall provide recommendations to mitigate the impact of earthquake faults, ground
shaking and liquefaction.
The Developer shall have a Drainage Study prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in
accordance with City Standards identifying storm water runoff expected from this site
and upstream of this site. The study shall identify all existing or proposed public or
private drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. The study shall also analyze
and identify impacts to downstream properties and provide specific recommendations to
protect the properties and mitigate any impacts. Any upgrading or upsizing of
downstream facilities, including acquisition of drainage or access easements necessary
to make required improvements, shall be provided by the Developer.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
RID 1'.2004\04-0134 CBC Business Cente>IDP iliaf! PC Conditions.doc
II
48.
49.
50.
51.
a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff
year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction
BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the
approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project
proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
.
As deemed necessary by the Director of the Department of Public Works, the Developer
shall receive written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall obtain any necessary letters of approval or slope easements for off-
site work performed on adjacent properties as directed by the Department of Public
Works. ' ,
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
.
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
52.
Precise grading plans shall conform to applicable City of Temecula Standards subject to
approval by the Director of the Department of Public Works. The following design criteria
shall be observed:
a.
Flowline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00% minimum over
A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City of Temecula Standard No. 207A.
Concrete sidewalks and ramps shall be constructed along public street frontages
in accordance with City of Temecula Standard Nos. 400, 401and 402.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
b.
c.
d.
e.
53.
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements to City of Temecula
General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved
by the Director of the Department of Public Works:
.
R:\D 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Conditions.doc
12
.J
54.
55.
56.
. 57.
58.
59.
60.
a.
Improve Dendy Parkway (Major Highway Standards - 100' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities, and utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer).
b.
Improve Remington Avenue (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities, and utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer).
The Developer shall construct the following public improvements in conformance with
applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Director of the Department of
Public Works.
a.
Street improvements, which may include, but not limited to: sidewalks, drive
approaches, storm drain facilities, sewer and domestic water systems
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil or Traffic
Engineer and reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works for any street
closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department
of Public Works.
All access rights, easements for sidewalks for public uses shall be submitted and
reviewed by the Director of the Department of Public Works and City Attorney and
approved by City Council for dedication to the City where sidewalks meander through
private property.
The building pad shall be certified to have been substantially constructed in accordance
with the approved Precise Grading Plan by a registered Civil Engineer, and the Soil
Engineer shall issue a Final Soil Report addressing compaction and site conditions.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and
all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.06.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation
Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with,
Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing
Chapter 15.08.
Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy
61.
.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall' receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b.
Eastern Municipal Water District
Department of Public Works
c.
R:ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business Center\DP Draft PC Conditions.doc
13
62.
63.
All public improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and
City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of the Department of Public Works.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of the
Department of Public Works.
.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
The following are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions
regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau.
64.
65.
66.
,67.
68.
69.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or
construction of all commercial buildings per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-1. The
developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2750 GPM
at 20 PSI residual operating pressure, plus an assumed sprinkler demand of 1400 GPM
for a total fire flow of 4150 GPM with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be
adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or
automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire
Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2,
Appendix III-A)
.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix \\I-B, Table A-III-B-1. A minimum of 3 hydrants, in a combination of on-site and
off-site (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) on a looped system shall be located on fire access
roads and adjacent to public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 400 feet apart, at each
intersection and shall be located no more than 225 feet from any point on the street or
Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be
available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in. the system. The upgrade of existing fire
hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B).
As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility is in excess of
150 feet from a water supply on a public street, as measured by an approved route
around the exterior of the facility, on-site fire hydrants and mains capable of supplying
the required fire flow shall be provided. For this project on site fire hydrants are
required. (CFC 903.2)
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2)
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
.
R:\D 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Conditions.doc
14
. 70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
.
75.
76.
77.
78.
.
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development shall have two (2) points of access, via
all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water
system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall
be signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval
signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow
standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be
presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system
including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency
prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC
8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, approved numbers or
addresses shall be provided on all new and existing buildings in such a position as to be
plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. Numbers shall be
of a contrasting color to their background. Commercial, multi-family residential and
industrial buildings shall have a minimum twelve (12) inches numbers with suite
numbers a minimum of six (6) inches in size. All suites shall gave a minimum of six (6)
inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. Single family
residences and multi-family residential units shall have four (4) inch letters and lor
numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 901.4.4)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on square footage
and type of construction, occupancy or use, the developer shall install a fire sprinkler
system. Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for
approval prior to installation. (CFC Article 10, CBC Chapter 9)
Prior to issuance of Certificate of Occupancy or building final, based on a requirement
for monitoring the sprinkler system, occupancy or use, the developer shall install an fire
alarm system monitored by an approved Underwriters Laboratory listed central station.
Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation.
(CFC Article 10)
R,IO Pl2004\04.()134 CBC Business Ceuter\DP Omit PC Couditious,doc
15
79.
80.
81.
82.
83.
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, a "Knox-Box" shall
be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six (6) feet in height and be
located to the right side of the sprinkler riser room door. (CFC 902.4)
.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by fire fighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire
Department for approval, a site plan designating Fire Lanes with appropriate -lane
painting and or signs.
Prior to the building final, speculative buildings capable of housing high-piled
combustible stock, shall be designed with the following fire protection and life safety
features: an automatic fire sprinkler system(s) designed for a specific commodity class
and storage arrangement, hose stations, alarm systems, smoke vents, draft curtains,
Fire Department access doors and Fire department access roads. Buildings housing
high-piled combustible stock shall comply with the provisions California Fire Code Article
81 and all applicable National Fire Protection Association standards. (CFC Article 81)
Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, the
developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground
tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other
hazardous materials from both the County Health department and Fire Prevention
Bureau.(CFC 7901.3 and 8001.3)
.
Special Conditions
84.
85.
86.
Prior to building permit issuance, a full technical report may be required to be submitted
and to the Fire Prevention Bureau. This report shall address, but not be limited to, all fire
and life safety measures per 1998 CFC, 1998 CBC, NFPA - 13, 24, 72 and 231-C.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final a simple plot plan and a
simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau. Alternative file formats may be acceptable, contact fire
prevention for approval.
87.
The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the Fire Code permit process and
update any changes in the items and quantities approved as part of their Fire Code
permit. These changes shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and
approval per the Fire Code and is subject to inspection. (CFC 105)
The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the Riverside County Department
of Environmental Health and City Fire Department an update to the Hazardous Material
Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report on file at the city; should any
quantities used or stored onsite increase or should changes to operation introduce any
additional hazardous material not listed in existing reports. (CFC Appendix II-E)
.
R:ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlDP Draft PC Conditions,doc
16
.
BUILDING AND SAFETY
88.
89.
90.
91.
92.
. 93.
94.
95.
96.
97.
98.
99.
100.
101.
.
All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the 2001 edition of the
California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; 2001 California Electrical Code;
California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled
Access Regulations, and the Temecula Municipal Code.
The City of Temecula has adopted an ordinance to collect fees for a Riverside County
area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). Upon the adoption of this
ordinance on March 31, 2003, this project will be subject to payment of these fees at the
time of building permit issuance. The fees shall be subject to the provisions of Ordinance
03-01 and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Submit at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plans showing compliance
with Ordinance No. 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All street-lights and other
outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Department of
Building and Safety. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and direçted so as not to shine
directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way.
A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley School District shall be submitted
to the Building & Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School
Mitigation Fees.
Obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any
construction work.
Obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings prior to submittal for plan review.
All building and facilities must comply with applicable disabled access regulations.
Provide all details on plans. (California Disabled Access Regulations effective April 1,
1998)
Provide disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building.
Provide van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entry.
Provide house electrical meter provisions for power for the operation of exterior lighting,
fire alarm systems.
Restroom fixtures, number and type, to be in accordance with the provisions of the 2001
edition of the California Building Code Appendix 29.
Provide an approved automatic fire sprinkler system.
Provide appropriate stamp of a registered professional with original signature on plans
prior to permit issuance.
Provide electrical plan including load calculations and panel schedule, plumbing
schematic and mechanical plan for plan review.
R,ID 1'12004\04-0134 CBC Business Cent.,IDP Draft PC Conditions.doc
17
102.
103.
104.
105.
106.
107.
Truss calculations that are stamped by the engineer of record and the truss
manufacturer engineer are required for plan review submittal.
.
Provide precise grading plan at plan check submittal to check accessibility for persons
with disabilities.
A pre-construction meeting is required with the building inspector prior to the start of the
building construction.
Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls if not on the
approved building plans, will require separate approvals and permits.
Show all building setbacks.
Signage shall be posted conspicuously at the entrance to the project that indicates the
hours of construction, shown below, as allowed by the City of Temecula Ordinance No.
94-21, specifically Section G (1) of Riverside County Ordinance No. 457.73, for any site
within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence.
Monday-Friday 6:30 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
Saturday 7:00 a.m. - 6:30 p.m.
No work is permitted on Sunday or Government Holidays
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
.
108.
109.
110.
111.
The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as,
regular solid waste containers.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
The applicant shall comply with the Public Art Ordinance.
All parkways, landscaping, fencing and on site lighting shall be maintained by the
property owner or maintenance association.
Prior To Issuance Of Building Permits
112.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
113.
Landscaping: Applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at
a height of no more than three feet (3') or below the ground floor windowsills. Plants,
hedges and shrubbery should be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from
breaking into the building utilizing lower level windows.
.
R,ID 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Omit PC Cnnditions,doc
18
.
.
.
114.
115.
116.
117.
118.
119.
120.
121.
a.
Applicant should ensure all trees surrounding all building roof tops be kept at a
distance so as to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Trees also act
as a natural ladder. Prune tree branches with at least a 6 feet clearance from the
buildings.
Any burms should not exceed 3' in height.
The placement of all landscaping should comply with guidelines from Crime
Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED).
b.
, c.
Lighting: All parking lot lighting surrounding the complex should be energy-saving and
minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with the State of California Lighting
Ordinance. Furthermore, all exterior lighting must comply with Mt. Palomar Lighting
Requirements.
a. All exterior doors should have their own vandal resistant fixtures installed above.
The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one (1) foot candle of light at
ground level, evenly dispersed.
Hardware: All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous
hardware shall be commercial or institution grade.
Graffiti: Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings shall be removed or painted
over within twenty-four (24) hours of being discovered. Notify the Temecula Police
Department immediately so a report can be taken.
Alarm System: Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored
alarm system installed and monitored 24-hours a day by a designated private alarm
company, to notify the police department immediately of any intrusion. All multi-tenant
office/suites/ businesses located within a specific building should have their own alarm
system.
Roof Hatches: All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange."
Public Telephones: Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings should
be placed in a well-lighted, highly visible area, and installed with a "call-out only" feature
to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the
interior of the buildings.
Marked Parking for Disabled Vehicles: All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall
be marked in accordance with section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code.
Crime Prevention:
a.
All retailing businesses shall contact the California Retailers Association for their
booklet on the California Retail Theft Law at: California Retailers Association
1127-11'h Street, Suite 1030, Sacramento, CA '95814 (916) 443-1975. Penal
Code 490.5 affords merchants the opportunity to recover their losses through a
civil demand program.
Business desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the
crime prevention unit of the Temecula Police Department.
b.
R:ID 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Draft PC Couditions.doc
19
c.
Employee training regarding retail theft, credit card prevention, citizen's arrest
procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related
crime prevention training procedures are also available through the crime
prevention unit.
Any business that serves or sell any type of alcoholic beverages will comply with
all guidelines within the Business and Profession Codes and all other guidelines
associated with the State Department of Alcohol Beverage Control. Contact the
Temecula Police Department for inspections and training for both employees and
owners. This includes special events held at business location where alcohol will
be serviced for a fee and the event is open to the general public.
The Temecula Police Department affords all retailers the opportunity to
participate in the "Inkless Ink Program." At a minimal cost of less than $40.00 for
inkless inkpads, retailers can take a thumbprint of every customer using a
personal check to pay for services. A decal is also posted on the front entry of
the business-advising customers of the "Inkless Ink program in use". If the
business becomes a victim of check fraud, the police department will be able to
track the suspect with the thumbprint.
d.
e.
OUTSIDE AGENCIES
122.
123.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 17, 2004 from the
Riverside County Department of Environmental Health.
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated March 5, 2004 from Rancho
Water. .
The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 30, 2004 from Riverside
County Flood Control and Water Conservation District.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
124.
Date
Applicant's Signature
Applicant's Printed Name
RID 1'12004\04-0134 CBC Business CenterIDP Drnft PC Cunditiuns,doc
20
.
..
.
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. COMMUNITY HEALTH AGENCY
DEPARTMENT Of ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
March 17,2004
RE:-
Plot Plan No. PAO4-0134
f{ò)œ @ [E D f!J [EfñJ
V1J MAR 222004 ill
By
~
City of TemecuJa Planning Depal1ment
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Attention: Stuart Fisk
Dear Mr. Fisk:
1. Department of Environmental Health has reviewed the Plot Plan No. P A04-0134 to construct a
131,890 sq. ft. industrial building and has no objections. Water and sewer services should be
available in this area.
2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS THE FOLLOWING SHOULD
BE REQUIRED:
a) "Will-serve" letters from the appropriate water and sewering districts.
.
b) If there are to be any food establishments, (including vending machines), three complete
sets of plans for each food establishment will be submitted including a fixture schedule,
a finish schedule and a plumbing schedule in order to ensure compliance with the
California Uniform Retail Food Facilities Law 2. For specific reference, contact Food
Facility Plan Examiners at (909) 600-6330.
c) If there are to be any hazardous materials, a clearance letter from the Department of
Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Management Branch (600-6333) will be
required indicating that the project has been cleared for:
+ Underground storage tanks, Ordinance # 617.4.
+ Hazardous Waste Generator Services, Ordinance # 615.3.
+ Hazardous Waste Disclosure (in accordance with Ordinance # 651.2).
+ Waste reduction management.
Sincerely,
Sam Martinez, Supervising Environmental Health Specialist
(909) 955-8980
NOTE: Any current additional requirements not covered can be applicable at time of Building Plan
review for final Department of Environmental Health clearance.
Doug Thompson, Hazardous Materials
.cc:
oeat Enforcement Agency' Po. Box 1280. Riverside. CA 92502.]280 . (909) 955.8982 . FAX (909) 781.9653 . 40B!) Leman Streel. 9th Floor. Riverside. CA 92501
ond Use and Wnter Engineering' PO. Box 1206. Riverside. CA 92502.]206 . (909) 955.8980 . FAX (909) 955.8903 . 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor. Riverside, CA 92501
@
Bancha
Water
March 5, 2004
W~Rr:; ~o;,wl
By
B,.,,¡,fDirecton
Stuart Fisk, Project Planner
City of Temecula
Planning Department
43200 Business Park Drive
Post Office Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
John E, Boa,load
P~id.nl
C~ha F. Eo
S" y", ?reaidonl
SUBJECT:
WATER AND SEWER AVAILABILITY
PARCEL NO.2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 30044
APN 909-370-037
CBC BUSINESS CENTER
[PROJECT NO, PA04-0134]
Stephen J. Coro~
Rolph IL Daily
BonlLDrake
Llaa D. Be=an
John y. Bo~i
Dear Mr. Fisk:
Ofr"""
Please be advised that the above-referenced property is located within the
boundaries of Rancho California Water District (RCWD). Water and sewer
service, therefore, would be available upon the completion of financial
arrangements between RCWD and the property owner.
Brioa J. Brody
Ge..,,1 Manag"
Phillip L. Fo,h..
DU."""fFin'n,~'I>e.,u",
E.P. "Boh" Lemo~
Di",,"" ,fEngin..rin.
Ee=eth C. Deaiy
Direct""fO,...ti,..
& M,intenonoo
If fire protection is required, the customer will need to contact RCWD for fees
and requirements.
Pe,.,." IL Louck
C..troll" Water availability would be contingent upon the property owner signing an
:;::':'~'::=/':-.mini""ativo Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to RCWD.
SeNioo, Menag"
C. Mi"""" Cn~tt
Be'" Be.t & ""ieger u.P
Genenl Coan""¡
This development fronts an existing RCWD recycled water facility. RCWD will
require that the proposed project landscaping use recycled water for irrigation.
If you should have any questions, please contact an Engineering Services
Representative at this office at (909) 296-6900.
Sincerely,
RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT
~e~
Steve Brannon, P £.
Development Engineering Manager
04\SB:atO68\FCF
e:
CBC Remington LLC
Roneho Califn"'" Water o;"rict
42135 Win,h....,"".d . PœtOffiœBca9017 ' T.mocuI.. e,Jifomi. 92589-9017 . (909)296-6900' FAX (909)296-6860
WARREN D. WILLIAMS
;eneral Maoager-ChiefEnginecr
.
1995 MARKET STREET
RlVERSIDE, CA 92501
909.955.1200
909.788.9965 FAX
51180.1
RlVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRlCT
City of Temecula
þ~~nÓ'W.c~ec;~~~rj
Temecula. californ~a 92589-9033 4
Attention: g""", I f\g-o(.. ('
Ladies and Gentlemen:
Re:
PAaL\ -() 3 'i
The District does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated
cities. The District also does not plan check cil)' land use cases. or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or
other flood hazard reports for such cases. Distòct comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited
to items of specific Interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood
control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical componen( or extension of a master plan system,
and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is
provided.
The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail and the following checked comments do not in any way
constitute or imply District approva! or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public
health and safety or any other such Issue:
Å This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities nor are other facilities of
regional Interest proposed.
This project involves District Master Plan facilities. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on
~ written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and
insp~ction will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be
required.
. . - This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be
considered regional in nature andlor a logical extension of the adopted
Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on wntten request
of the City. Facil~ies must be constructed to District standards, and District p!an check and inspection will
be requiréd for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection and administrative fees will be required.
L ~~~n~~¿~~~ ~~~~~~in~~eli~~~ ~~~e b~~~i~~~~~~~JbW~I~tìe ~I~y cas~~~;
check or money order only to lfIe Flood Control District prior 0 issuance of building or grading permits
whichever comes first. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the .actual
permit.
GENERAL INFORMATION
This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the
. City has determined that the project has bèen 9ranted a permit or is shown to be exempt.
If this project involves a Federal Emergen<:y Management Agency (FEMA) mapped flood plain, then the City should
require the applicant to provide all studies calculations, plans and ofher Information re~uired to meet FEMA
requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR)
prior to grading, recordation or other final approval of the project, and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to
occupancy,
.
If a natural watercourse or mapped flood plain is impacted by this project the City should require the applicant to
obtain a Section 1601/1603 Agreement from the California Department OJ Fish and Game and a Clean Water Act
Section.404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies
indicatin.g the project is exempt from these reqUIrements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification
may þe required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404
permit.
Very truly yours,
~~
ARTURO DIAZ
Senior Civil Engineer
Date: ¿;1};/7",- .3q ~:1'
c:
~Œ@ŒO\'OŒ~
~~ JUL 0 2 2004 l!!J
AM"S
By
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 3
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2005--
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
R:\D 1'\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlSTAFF REPORT,doc
11
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0136, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32113 TO
CREATE 44 INDUSTRIAL CONDOMINIUM UNITS IN TWO
BUILDINGS RANGING IN SIZE FROM 2,066 SQUARE FEET TO
4,143 SQUARE FEET ON 8.5 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED
ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF REMINGTON AVENUE AND
SOUTH SIDE OF DENDY ROAD, BETWEEN DIAZ ROAD AND
WINCHESTER ROAD, KNOWN AS ASSESSOR PARCEL NO,
909-370-037.
WHEREAS, Matthew Fagan, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0136 (Tentative Tract
Map No. 32113), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and
Development Code;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice,
in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on January 5, 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in
opposition to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearing and after due consideration of
the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based
upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby
makes the following findings as required by Section 16.09.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code:
A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code.
The proposed subdivision is a Tentative Tract Map for industrial condominiums and is
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code because the proposed Tentative Tract Map complies
with the development standards and will function as a typical single lot with individual
owners of each building suite.
R:\T Ml2004\04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlTracl Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions,doc
I
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land. which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
.
The project site is not subject to any agreements entered into pursuant to the California
Land Conservation Act of 1965, because the project site is not within an area requiring
conservation nor is the land or surrounding land used for agricultural purposes.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the Tentative Tract Map because the project site will function as a single
lot, which allows for, required access, circulation and improvements, however the
individual industrial condominium units will be individually owned.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, will not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, because the project conforms with the
adopted Mitigated Negative Declaration and all required mitigation measures have been
incorporated into the conditions of approval.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems because development will be inspected by City Staff prior
to occupancy to ensure all improvements are constructed in a manner consistent with
City of Temecula standards.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or
cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible, because the construction plans will
comply with all applicable building codes and State energy guidelines.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are
substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided
because required off-site dedications and improvements have been provided or will be
acquired as conditions of approval.
.
R:IT Ml2004104-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlT,act Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions,doc
2
.
.
.
H.
(Quimby).
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
Industrial subdivisions are not required to dedicate parkland or feeslrequirements
(Quimby), therefore the project is consistent with the City's Parkland dedication
requirements.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. Pursuant to California Environmental
Quality Act ("CEQA") and the City's local CEQA Guidelines, City staff prepared an Initial Study
of the potential environmental effects of the proposed Project. Based upon the findings
contained in that Study, City staff determined that there was no substantial evidence that the
project could have a significant effect on the environment and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared.
Section 4. Conditions. The City of Temeéula Planning Commission hereby
approves Planning Application PA04-0136, a Tentative Tract Map No. 32113 to create 44
condominium units within two industrial buildings on 8.5 acres with conditions of approval as set
forth on Exhibit "A", attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any
and all necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 5th day of January 2005.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:IT Ml2004\04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business Cente>\Tcact Map dRaft PC Resn & Conditions.doc
3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005-_was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January, 2005, by the
following vote of the Commission:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:IT M\2004104-0136 TIM 321 13 CBC Business CenterlTract Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions.doc
4
.
.
.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
R:IT M\2004\04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlTract Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions.doc
5
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No.: PA03-0136
Project Description:
A Tentative Tract Map for 44 Industrial Condominiums
within two industrial buildings on 8.5 acres located on
the north side of Remington Avenue and south side of
Dendy Road, between Diaz Road and Winchester
Road.
MSHCP Category:
Business Park/Industrial
Assessor's Parcel No,:
909-370-037
Approval Date:
January 5, 2005
Jànuary 5,2008
Expiration Date:
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty Four Dollars
($64.00) County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination
for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section
21108(a) and California Code of Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight
(48) hour period the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department
the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason
of failure of condition [Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)].
General Requirements
2.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions
listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act
and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the expiration date.
3.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
R,IT Ml2004104-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlTract Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditinns,doc
6
4.
5.
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
If Subdivision phasing is proposed, a phasinq plan shall be submitted to and approved
by thè Planning Director.
The applicant shall comply with the conditions of approval for Planning Application
PA04-0134 and Parcel Map No. 30044, including the mitigation measures included
therein, unless superseded by these conditions of approval.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
6.
7.
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Division.
The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula
M~nicipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that
ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. '
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
8.
A copy of the Final Map.
A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
a. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory.
All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of
Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655.
A Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared for this project and is on file at
the City of Temecula Planning Department.
This project is within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone.
The property is affected by earthquake faulting and ground fissures. Structures
for human occupancy shall not be allowed in the fault and ground fissure hazard
area.
9.
b.
c.
d.
e.
County Geologic Report No. 1314 was prepared for this property on February 24,
2004 (updated July 8, 2004 and October 18, .2004 by Twinig-Goval-Ryan
Geotechnical Services.
10.
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's)
a. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's
shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space,
recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all
landscaped and open areas including parkways.
The CC&R's shall be prepared at the developer's sole cost and expense.
b.
R,IT M\2004I04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business Ceute,IT,act Map dRaft PC Resa & Cauditious.doc
7
.
.
.
.
.'
11.
12.
.
c.
The CC&R's shall be in the form and content approved by the Planning Director,
City Engineer and the City Attorney and shall include such provisions as are
required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the
interests of the City and it's residents.
The CC&R's and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owner's Association
are subject to the approval of the Planning and Public Works Departments and
the City Attorney. They shall be recorded concurrent with the final map. A
recorded copy shall be provided to the City.
The CC&R's shall provide for the effective establishment, operation,
management, use, repair and maintenance of all common areas, drainage and
facilities.
The CC&R's shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated and
maintained so as not to create a public nuisance.
The CC&R's shall provide that the association may not be terminated without
prior City approval.
The CC&R's shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition
required by the CC&R's, then the City, after making due demand and giving
reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner's sole
expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&R's or the City
Ordinances. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure
any such expense not promptly reimbursed.
Every owner of a suite or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot,
either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share
in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common
areas and facilities.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
All open areas and landscaping shall be permanently maintained by the
association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this
maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning and Public Works Department
prior to the issuance of building permits.
k.
Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to
all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives or parking areas shall be
provided by the CC&R's or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the
map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a copy of a recorded Reciprocal
Use Agreement, which provides for cross-lot access and parking across all lots and
establishes mutual responsibility for all commonly accessed areas and street front
landscaping.
No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association,
property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all
properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the
use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment
power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control,
and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development.
Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's, which shall include compulsory
R:\TM\2004I04-0J36 TIM 32113 CBC Business Cente<\T"ct Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions.doc
8
membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet
changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit
enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The
developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land
dedicated to the City for public purposes.
.
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
General Requirements.
13.
14.
15.
16.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the
Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the
City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing
improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of
Temecula mylars.
.
Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
17.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
e. Planning Department
f. Department of Public Works
g. Riverside County Health Department
h. Cable TV Franchise
i.
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
.
j.
k.
I.
R:IT M\2004104.0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlTract Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions,dnc
9
.
18.
19.
.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
.
25.
The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public
improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted.
Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works:
a. Improve Dendy Parkway (Major Highway Standards - 100' R/W) to include
installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities and utilities (including but not limited to
water and sewer)
Improve Remington Avenue (Principal Collector Highway Standards - 78' R/W) to
include installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities and utilities (including but not
limited to water and sewer).
b.
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the
design of the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00%
minimum over A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207A.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos.
400 and 401.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV
shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provider.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Dendy Parkway on the Final Map with
the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Remington Avenue on the Final Map
with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or
abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of
an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior
to City Council approval of the Final Map, the Developer shall make an application for
reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
R,IT M\2004\04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenterlTractMap dRaft PC Resa & Conditions,doc
10
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the
map. .
.
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall record a written offer to participate in, and waive all rights to object
to the formation of an Assessment District, a Community Facilities District, or a Bridge
and Major Thoroughfare Fee District for the construction of the proposed Western
Bypass Corridor in accordance with the General Plan. The form of the offer shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer and City Attorney.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
A 26-foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access
for all private drives.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for
review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage
facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage
easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating
"drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. "
Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit
32.
33.
.
The Development Plan shall be approved.
Other Agencies
64.
The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated May 11, 2004, a copy
of which is attached.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
.
RIT Ml2004\04-0136 TIM 32113 CBC Business CenteflTract Map dRaft PC Reso & Conditions.doc
II
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. COMMlYl'1ITY HEALTH AGENCY
DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
May 11,2004
~re~rscn\VlŒ~..~
W MAY 1 7 2004 W
City of Temecula Planning Department
P.O. Box 9033
Temecula, CA 92589-9033
AnN: Cheryl Kitzerow
By
RE: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 32113 (1 LOT)
Industrial Condorninium Development
Dear Ms. Kitzerow:
1. The Department of Environmental Health has reviewed Tentative Tract Map 32113 and
recommends:
.
'a A water system shall be installed in accordance with plans and specifications as
approved by the water company and the Environmental Health Department.
Permanent prints of the plans of the water system shall be subrnitted in triplicate;
with a minimum scale not less than one inch equals 200 feet, along with the
original drawing to the County Surveyor's Office. The prints shall show the
internal pipe diameter, location of valves and fire hydrants; pipe and joint
specifications, and the size of the main at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. The plans shall comply in all respects with Div. 5, Part 1,
Chapter 7 of the California Health and Safety Code, California Administrative
Code, Title 11, Chapter 16, and General Order No.1 03 of the Public Utilities
Commission of the State of California, when applicable. The plans shall be
signed by a registered engineer and water company with the following
certification: "I certifY that the design of the water system in Tentative Tract Map
32113 is in accordance with the water system expansion plans of the Rancho
California Water. District and that the water services, storage, and distribution
system will be adequate to provide water service to such "Tentative Tract Map".
This certification does not constitute a guarantee that it win supply water to such
Tentative Tract Map at any specific quantities, flows or pressures for fire
protection or any other purpose. A responsible official of the water company shall
sign this certification. The plans must be submitted to the County Survevor's
Office to review at least two weeks PRIOR to the reQuest for the recordation of
the [mal map.
2. This Department has a written statement fi:om Rancho California Water District agreeing
to serve domestic water to each and every lot in the subdivision on demand providing
satisfactory financial arrangements are completed with the sub divider. It win be
necessary for financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final
map.
.
cocal Enforcement Agency . ~o. Box 1280, Riverside. CA 92502-1280 . (909) 955-8982 .. FAX (909) 781-9653 . 4080 Lemon Street. 9th Floor. Riverside. CA 92501
'.and U.. and W.ler Engineering' f!(), Box 1206. Riverside. CA 9251J2-1206 . (909) 955-8980 . FAX (909) 955-89Q3 . 4080 Lemon Street. 2nd Floor, Riverside, CA 92501
Page Two
Attn: Cheryl Kitzerow
3. This subdivision is within the Rancho California Water District and shall be connected to
the sewers of the District. The sewer system shall be installed in accordance with plans
and specifications as approved by the District, the County Surveyor's Office and the
Health Department. Pennanent prints of the plans of the sewer system shall be submitted
in triplicate, along with the original drawing, to the County Surveyor's Office. The prints
shall show the internal pipe diameter, location of manholes, complete profiles, pipe and
joint specifications and the size of the sewers at the junction of the new system to the
existing system. A single plat indicating location of sewer lines and waterlines shall be a
portion of the sewage plans and profiles. The plans shall be singed by a registered
engineer and the sewer district with the following certification: "I certify that the design
of the sewer system in Tentative Tract Map 32113 is in accordance with the sewer system
expansion plans of the Eastern Munícipal Water District and that the waste disposal
system is adequate at this time to treat the anticipated wastes ITom the proposed Tentative
Tract Map". The plans must be submitted to the County Surveyor's Office to review at
least two weeks PRIOR to the request for the recordation of the fmal map.
2. This Department has a written statement ITom Rancho California Water District agreeing
to serve sewer service to each and every lot in the subdivision. It will be necessary for
financial arrangements to be made PRIOR to the recordation of the final map.
Sincerely,
~~ "oUth S¡><ci""
(909) 955-8980
.
.
.
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.4
INITIAL STUDY AND
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
RID 1'12004104-0134 CBC Business CenterISTAFFREPORT,doc
12
City of Temecula
. Planning Department
Agency Distribution List
PA04-0134 is a request for a Development Plan to construct two, multi-tenant
industrial buildings on 8.5 acres. Building A is 73,148 square feet. Building B is
55,785 square feet. PA04-0136 is a request for a Tentative Tract Map No. 32113
to create 27 condominium units in Building A and 17 condominium units in Building
B, ranging in size from 2,066 square feet to 4,143 square feet.
PROJECT:
DISTRIBUTION DATE: December 14, 2004
CASE PLANNER: Cheryl Kitzerow
. CITY OF TEMECULA:
Building & Safety..................................... (X)
Fire Department """"""""""""""""""" (X)
Police Department .................................. (X)
Parks & Recreation (TCSD) .................... (X)
Planning, Advance """"""""""""""""" ( )
Public Works ........................................... (X)
........( )
. STATE:
Caltrans................................................... ( )
Fish & Game........................................... ( )
Mines & Geology..................................... ( )
Regional Water Quality Control Bd .,....... ( )
State Clearinghouse ............................... ( )
State Clearinghouse (15 Copies)............ ( )
'Water Resources """""""""""""""""" ( )
...... ( )
FEDERAL:
Army Corps of Engineers ........................ ( )
Fish and Wildlife Service......................... ( )
........ ( )
REGIONAL:
Air Quality Management District.............. (X)
Western Riverside COG ......................... ( )
...... ( )
. CITY OF MURRIETA:
Planning.................................................. ( )
...... ( )
R ,10 P\2004104-O 134 CBC Business CenterlNotice of Intentdoc
RIVERSIDE COUNTY:
Clerk and Recorder's Office.................... (X)
Airport Land Use Commission .................( )
Engineer """""""""""""""""""""""'" (X)
Flood Control.......................................... (X)
Health Department ................................. (X)
Parks and Recreation ..............................( )
Planning Department...............................( )
Habitat Conservation Agency (RCHCA) .. ( )
Riverside Transit Agency........................ (X)
.......( )
UTILITY:
Eastern Municipal Water District............. (X)
Inland Valley Cablevision........................ (X)
Rancho CAWater District, Will Serve .... (X)
Southern California Gas ......................... (X)
Southern California Edison ..................... (X)
Metropolitan Water District ......................( )
......... ( )
OTHER:
Temecula Valley School District ............. (X)
Pechanga Indian Reservation................. (X)
Eastern Information Center """""""""" (X)
Local Agency Formation Comrn ..............( )
RCTC ......................................................( )
Homeowners' Association ..........................( )
Vicinity Map
.
.
R,ID P12004104-Q134 CBC Bus;ness Cente,\Notice of Intent doc
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Contact Person and Phone Number
Project Location
Surrounding Land Uses and Setting
Environmental Checklist
CBC Remin ton Business Center, PA04-0134 and PA04-0136
City of Temecula
P.O. Box 9033, Temecula, CA 92589-9033
Che I Kitzerow, Associate Planner 951 694-6400
North of Remington Avenue, south of Dendy Parkway in the City of
Temecula. Assessor's Parcel Number 909-370-032
Matthew Fa an, 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera, Temecula, CA 92591
Business Park BP
Li ht Industrial LI
PA04-0134 is a request for a Development Plan to construct two,
multi-tenant industrial buildings on 8.5 acres. BuiJding A is 73,148
square feet. Building B is 55,785 square feet. PA04-0136 is a
request for a Tentative Tract Map No. 32113 to create 27
condominium units in Building A and 17 condominium units in
Building B, ranging in size from 2,066 square feet to 4,143 square
feet.
North:
East:
South:
West:
None
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatdoc1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one
impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
x
I
x
X
Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
x
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not
be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by
the roject ro onent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be re ared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is re uired.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant
unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in
an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT is re uired, but it must anal e onl the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are
im osed u on the ro osed ro'ect, nothin further is re uired.
r~, ~~
Signatur
~/q/°'f
Date
Chervl Kitzerow. Associate Planner
Printed name
City of Temecula
For
.
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Cenlerllnitial Study Correct Format.doc2
1. "AESTHETICS. Would the project:
a.
b.
c.
d.
Issues and Su rtin Infonnation Sources
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic hi hwa ?
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
uali of the site and its surroundin s?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the
area?
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
MiUgation
Inco ",ted
No
1m act
X
X
Less Than
Significant
1m act
X
X
1. a.-c: No Impact The proposed project is not located on or near a scenic vista; therefore, there will not be an
adverse impact on a scenic vista. The project site is not located on a scenic highway. The project site is an 8.5
acre site, that has been previously graded and is currently vacant with no structures or rock outcroppings on
the site. Therefore, the proposed project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including rock
outcroppings or historic buildings. Due to the fact that the project site is vacant with no scenic vistas or
resources, the project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
ad.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project is currently vacant with no sources pf light or
_reo The proposed project will introduce new generators of light and glare typically associated with industrial
development. The City of Temecula requires all new development to comply with the Riverside County Mount
Palomar Ordinance 655. Ordinance 655 requires lighting to be shielded, directed down to avoid glare onto
adjacent properties and emit low levels of glare into the sky.
2. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a.
b.
c.
Issues and Su rtin Information Sources
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland
of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the
maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency,
to non-a ricultural use?
Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
Involve other changes in the existing environment which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion
of Farmland, to non-a ricultural use?
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Fonnatdoc3
Potentiallý
Significant
1m act
Potentially.
. SignifiêantUnless
Mitigation
Inco o",tOO
Less Than
Significant
1m act
No
1m act
X
X
X
Comments:
2. a.-c.: No Impact: The project site is not currently in agricultural production and in the recent and historic
past the site has not been used for agricultural purposes. The site is not under a Williamson Act contract nor is .
it zoned for agricultural uses. This property is not considered prime or unique farmland of statewide or local
importance as identified by the State Department of Conservation and the City of Temecula General Plan. In
addition, the project will not involve changes in the existing environment, which would result in the conversion
of farmland to non-agricultural uses. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
Potenüally
Potentially Signmcant Unless Less Than
Significant Mnigation Significant No
'ssues and Suooortino Information Sou'ces 'moad Incomorated Imoad Imoad
a. Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable X
air quality plan?
b. Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially X
to an existing or projected air aualitv violation?
c. Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- X
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d. Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant X
concentrations?
e. Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number X
of people?
.
Comments:
3. a.: No Impact: The proposed project will not conflict with the applicable air quality plan. The project site is
comprised of 8.5 acres and the proposed development includes two industrial buildings consistent with the
zoning and general plan designations for the site. The City of Temecula Final EIR for the General Plan takes
into consideration the entire project site as an industrial use. No impact is anticipated as a result of the
proposed project.
3. b.: No Impact: The proposed project will not violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation. The proposed project will emit typical emissions and dust associated
with industrial construction; however, this is not considered a significant impact. No impact is anticipated as a
result of the proposed project.
3. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not result in a cumulatively considerable net
increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or
state ambient air quality standard. The proposed project will emit typical emissions and dust associated with
industrial construction which were anticipated in the General Plan EIR; therefore, this is not considered a
significant impact. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
3. d-e.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures:: There are no known sensitive receptors to.
pollutant concentrations in the immediate vicinity. The development of the project for industrial buildings will
create minor pollutants during the grading and construction phase of the project emanating from fugitive dust
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatd0c4
and small quantities of construction equipment pollutants. The following Mitigation Measures will reduce any
impacts to less than significance:
.
a. Prior to the issuance of a oradinQ permit, the applicant shall verifv that all earth movinQ and
larqe equipment are properlv. tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In addition,
alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used where feasible. Construction equipment
should be selected considerinQ emission factors and eneroy efficiency.
b. Electrical and/or diesel-powered equipment should be utilized in-lieu of oasoline-powered
enQines.
c. DurinQ construction and oradinQ phases, the project site shall be watered down in the
morninQ before Qradino andlor construction beoins and in the evenino once construction
and/or oradinq is complete for the day. The proiect site shall be watered down no less than 3
times (not includinQ the mornino and eveninQ water-down) durino construction and/or
qradinQ activities to reduce dust.
d. All fill beino transported to and/or from the site shall be covered and the wheels and lower
portion of transport trucks shall be sprayed with water to reduceleliminate soil from the
trucks before they leave the construction area.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project?
b.
c.
d.
e.
Issues and Su rtin Information Sources
Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species identified
as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the
California Department of Fish and Game oru'S. Fish and~
Wildlife Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat
or other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife
Service?
Have a substantial adverse effect of federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water
Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool,
coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological
interru tion, or other means?
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors,
or im ede the use of native wildlife nurse sites? '
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation
Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat
conservation Ian?
Polentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
loco rated
No .
1m act
X
Less Than
Significant
1m act
x
X
X
X
X
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatdoc5
Comments:
4. a.-f.: No Impact: The project site is void of any natural biological resources, including wetlands, riparian .
forests, vernal pools, and nursery sites. The site is located within the Stephen's Kangaroo Rat Habitat Fee
Area. Habitat Conservation fees will be required as a standard condition of' approval to offset the effect of
cumulative impacts to the species from urbanization occurring throughout western Riverside County. The
project site is a part of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP),
which was adopted by City Council on January 13, 2004, and became effective March 12,2004. The subject
application was received prior to the effective date of the MSHCP and therefore the Plan does not apply and
no impacts are anticipated. The project site has previously been graded, and has also been grubbed and
disturbed for many years in order to comply with the City's weed abatement ordinance (Ord 8.16). There are
some grasses on the project site, however they are not considered sensitive habitat, nor is the site a part of a
wildlife corridor. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Signmcant No
Issues and Suooortino Information Sources Imoad Incomorated Imoad Imoad
a. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5?
b. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of X
an archaeoloGical resource Dursuant to Section 15064.5?
c. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological X
resource or site or unique GeoloGic feature?
d. Disturb any human remains, including those interred X
outside of formal cemeteries?
.
Comments:
5. a-d.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The City of Temecula General Plan
identifies the project site as a sensitive archaeological resource area and area of high paleontological
sensitivity (Figure 5-6 and 5-7, respectively). The applicant submitted a "Historical/Archaeological Resources
Review" prepared by CRM Tech (dated September 22, 2004) which reviewed and summarized previous
cultural resources investigations for the project area completed between 1998 and 2000 (TPM 28657). Among
these previous studies included a Phase I survey, a Phase II testing program, and a subsequent
archaeological monitoring program which occurred when the site was graded as part of the original Parcel Map
approval. The Phase 1 survey identified prehistoric archaeological site, CA-RIV-237 as partially occurring on
the project site, and therefore a Phase II testing program was completed. The testing program recovered more
than 1,000 artifacts which were analyzed by appropriate experts. After the completion of the field testing
program, on-site monitoring of earth-moving activities on TPM 28657 was conducted by CRM Tech and Native
American monitors from the Pechanga Indian Reservation. Based on the above information, identification and
evaluation of potential 'historical resources' within the project area have been completed through the 1998-
2000 studies, and no further impacts are anticipated. In order to ensure no significant impacts will result with
the development of the project site, the following mitigation measures will be implemented:
a. Prior to the issuance of a oradino permit. the applicant must enter into an aQreement with
the Pechanoa Band of Luiseno Indians that addresses the treatment and disposition of all
cultural resources. human resources and human remains discovered on-site. .
R:\D P\2004104.()134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatd0c6
b. The landowner aqrees to relinquish ownership of a/l cultural resources, includinq
archaeoloQical artifacts found on the proiect site, to the Pechanqa Band of Luiseno Indians
for proper treatment and disposition.
.
c. The applicant shall provide an on-site archaeoloQical and paleontoloQical monitorinQ durinQ
all phases of earthmovinQ activities.
d. If sacred sites are discovered durinq qround disturbinQ activities, they shall be avoided and
preserved.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project:
PotentIally
Potentially Significant Untess Less Than .NO"
Significant Mlt;gation SIgnificant
Issues and 5uooortlno Infonnatlon Sou'ces Imoact Inco.oorated tmoact tmpact
a. Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involvinq:
i. Rupture of a known earthquake faull, as delineated on X
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geoloqy Special Publication 42.
ii. Stronq seismic qround shakinq? X
-=iii. Seismic-related qround failure, includinq liQuefaction? X
IV. Landslides? X
b. Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X
c. Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or X
that would become unstable as a result of the project,
and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreadinq, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d. Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B X
of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial
risks to life or property?
e. Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of X
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater?
Comments:
6. a. i-iv: Less Than Significant with Mitigation Measures: Several Geotechnical Investigations have been
prepared for the subject site when the site and surrounding areas were subdivided and rough graded (see
references). These studies were recently reviewed by TGR Geotechnical, Inc. who determined the
information, findings and recommendations of the previous studies are still accurate and applicable ("Updated
Geotechnical Letter, prepared by Twinig-Goval-Ryan Geotechnical Services, February 24, 2004"). The most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area shows that the
~ is located within a State Designated Alquist-Priolo Eflrthquake Fault Zone. There may be a potentially
.nificant impact from seismic ground shaking, ground failure, or expansive soils. There are known fault
hazard zones on the property and the project is located in Southern California, an area that is seismically
active. Any potential significant impacts will be mitigated through building construction, which will be
RID PI2004\04-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Fonnat.doc7
consistent with the Uniform Building Code standards. Furthermore, the project will be conditioned to provide a
soil report concurrent with the submittal of precise grading plans and recommendations contained in this report
will be used to determine appropriate conditions of approval prior to the issuance of grading and building
permits. The soil report will contain recommendations for compaction of the soil, which will serve to mitigate.
any potentially significant impacts from seismic ground shaking, seismic ground failure, liquefaction,
subsidence and expansive soils. The following mitigation measures shall be implemènted:
a. The applicant shall comply with all the recommendations of the followinQ qeotechnical
reports prepared for the subject site:
EnGEN Corporation, 1997. Fault Investiqation. ExistinQ Restricted Use Zone. Parcel Maps
24085 and 24086. City of Temecula. Project No. T1179-FS, dated AuQust 29,1997.
EnGEN Corporation. 1998. Updated Geotechnical/GeoloQical Enqineerinq Study. Proposed
Expansion of Business Center. Parcels 1 throuQh 9 of Tract 28657. Diaz Road. City of
Temecula. Proiect No. T1381-GS, dated May 4,1998.
EnGEN Corporation. 1999. Geotechnical Report and Compaction Test Results. RoUQh
GradinQ Operations, Proposed Expansion of Existinq Business Center. Tract 28657, City of
Temecula. Proiect No. T1381-C. dated June 9, 1999.
6. b.: Less than Significant Impact: The project will not result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil.
The project site is relatively flat will be developed in accordance with City standards, including National
Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) standards, which require the implementation of erosion
control and best management practices (BMP's). The Final Environmental Impact Report for the City of
Temecula General Plan has not identified any known landslides or mudslides located on the site or proximate
to the site. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
6. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or.
that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse. The above referenced geotechnical reports adequately
addressed these concerns.
6. d.: No Impact: The project is not located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform
Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property. The geotechnical investigation prepared by
Twinig-Goval-Ryan Geotechnical Services, February 24, 2004 identifies the soils on the project site as 'very
low to low expansion potential as defined in the Uniform Building Code (UBC) Table No. 18-1-B.
6. è.: No Impact: The project site will not utilize septic tanks. A public sewer system is available and approvals
from the Department of Environmental Health for solid wastes and waste water will be required. The project will
connect to the public sewer system. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project:
Potentially ,
Potentially Signiticant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Issues and SuDDortlno Information Sources Imnad 'Incomorated Imnad 'mnad
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through the routine transportation, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the X
environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and
accident conditions involving the release of hazardous
materials into the environment?
.
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitiaf Study Correct FOfTTlat.doc8
e.
f.
g.
h.
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or
acutely hazardous materials, substances, or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existin or proposed school?
Be located on a site which is included on a list of
hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to
Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result,
would it create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
workin in the ro'ect area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
workin in the ro'ect area?
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation Ian?
Expose people or structures to a significant risk or loss,
injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
x
x
x
x
x
x
Comments:
Aa,: Less Than Significant Impact: The streets leading to the project are not transportation routes
'Wsignated for commercial haulers who may be transporting hazardous materials. However, because the
property and the surrounding area are and will be used for industrial buildings,' future tenants may include
businesses that require the delivery of hazardous materials. When an application is made for future tenant
improvements, a Statement of Operations and a Business Plan will be required for review by the City's Fire
Department to identify the likelihood of hazardous impacts and to assess the appropriate mitigation measures.
Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. b.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project proposes to create a 2 building, 44 unit industrial complex.
Since the activities of future tenants will be addressed during tenant improvements as noted in 9.a. above, it is
not anticipated that the project would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment. Therefore, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
7. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: This site is within one-quarter mile of a proposed college campus site at
the northwest intersection of Dendy Parkway and Diaz Road. The operation of construction equipment and
machinery during the development of this site may emit some hazardous emissions and or handle some
hazardous material. However, these emissions and material should be of limited quantities over a short
duration of time. No impacts are anticipated. .
7. d.: No Impact: The project site is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials
sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, would not result in a significant hazard to
the public or the environment. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project
Ae-f.: No Impact: The project site is not located within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public
.private airstrip. No impact upon airport uses will result from this proposal.
RID P12004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitiai Study Correct Format.doc9
7. g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area and is not a portion of an emergency
response or evacuation plan. Therefore the project would not impair the implementation of or physically
interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. No impact is anticipated as
a result of the proposed project. . -'
7. h.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in or near a wildland area that would be subject to fire
hazards. The location of the proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk or
loss, injury or death involving wildland fires. No impact is anticipated as a result of this project.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project:
.' Potentially
Potentially' ,Significant Unless less Than
Issues aOO Suooortino Information'Sources ' Significant Mitigation Significant No
Imoad IncötOOrated Imnact Imoad
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge X
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere X
substantially with groundwater recharge such ttiat there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of
the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate
of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which
would not support existing land uses or planned uses for
which permits have been aranted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site X
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result
in floodinG on- or off-site?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the X
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff?
f. Otherwise substantiallv dearade water qualitY? X
g. Place housing within a tOO-year flood hazard area as X
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map?
h. Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures X
which would impede or redirect flood flows?
i. '" Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, X
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
ì. Inundation bv seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X
.
Comments:
8. a.: No Impact: The project will not violate any water quality standards or waste discharge reqUirements..
Development will be required to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. No grading shall be permitted until
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatdoc10
an NPDES Notice of Intent has been filed or the project is shown to be exempt. By complying with the NPDES
requirements, any potential impacts can be mitigated to a level less than significant. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
eb.f.: No Impact: The project will not substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level. The project will not have an affect on the quantity and quality of ground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations or through
substantial loss of groundwater recharge capability. Further, construction on the site will not be at depths
sufficient to have a significant impact on ground waters or aquifer volume. No impacts are anticipated as a
result of this project.
8. c-d.: Less Than Significant Impact: The proposed project will not substantially alter the existing drainage
pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that
would result in substantial erosion or siltation and/or flooding on-site or off-site. Some changes to absorption
rates, drainage patterns and the rate and amount of surface runoff is expected whenever development occurs
on previously permeable ground. Previously permeable ground will be rendered impervious by construction of
buildings, accompanying hardscape and driveways. While absorption rates and surface runoff will change,
potential impacts shall be mitigated through site design. Drainage conveyances will be required for the project
to safely and adequé)tely handle runoff that is created. No significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project.
8. e.: No Impact: The project will not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff.
The project will be conditioned and designed to accommodate the drainage created as a result of the subject
site. In addition, the project will be conditioned and designed so that the drainage will not impact surrounding
~operties. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
.g.: No Impact: The proposed project is not a residential project and therefore will not place housing within a
1 DO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project
8. h.: Less Than Significant fmpact: A portion of the project containing parking areas is located within the
1 OO-year flood limits of Murrieta Creek, thereby placing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area improvements that
could impede or redirect flood flows. Conditions of approval will require the submittal of a drainage plan to
address flow and drainage facilities, and payment of flood mitigation fees to the Riverside County Flood
Control and Water Conservation District. A less than significant impact is anticipated as a result of the
proposed project.
8. i.: No Impact: The proposed project would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury
or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam. No impact is
anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
8. j;: No Impact: The proposed project is not located near a coast line which would be subject to inundation by
seiche, tsunami, or mudflow. No impact is anticipated as a result of the proposed project.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project:
Potentially
Significant
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
Inco '"ted
Less Than
Significant.
1m act
No
1m act
X
X
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatdoc11
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including. but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted
for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental
effect?
c, Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or X
natural community conservation plan?
.
Comments:
9, a.-c: No Impact The project will not disrupt or . divide the physical arrangement of an established
community. The project site is vacant and surrounded by industrial lots or buildings. The development of this
site will be consistent with the surrounding properties. The project will not conflict with the applicable General
Plan designation, environmental plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project. The
project is consistent with the City's General Plan land use designation of Business Park (BP) as well as the
zoning of Light Industrial (LI). Impacts from all General Plan land use designations were analyzed in the
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the General Plan. Agencies with jurisdiction within the City commented
on the scope of the analysis contained in the EIR and how the land uses would impact their particular agency.
Mitigation measures approved with the EIR have been applied to this project where necessary. Furthermore,
all agencies with jurisdiction over the project are being given the opportunity to comment on the project, and it
is anticipated that they will make the appropriate comments as to how the project relates to their specific
environmental plans or policies. The project site has been previously graded and services are available in the
area. The project site is a part of the Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(MSHCP), which was adopted by City Council on January 13, 2004, and became effective March 12, 2004.
The subject application was received prior to the effective date of the MSHCP and therefore the Plan does not
apply and no impacts are anticipated. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
Potentially Less T/lao .
Potentially Significant Unless
Significant . . Mitigation Signifitant. No
Issues and Sun~rtinn Information Sou","s Imoact . Incorno",'ed Imnact Imoact
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral X
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important X
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general olan, soecific plan or other land use olan?
"
Comments:
10. a.-b.: No Impact: The proposed project is not located in an area that is known to include minerals that are
considered of value to the region and/or the state. The proposed project will not result in the loss of a locally-
important mineral resource because the project site is not identified as an important site known to maintain
such resources as shown in the Final EIR for the City of Temecula General Plan. No impact is anticipated as a
result of the proposed project.
.
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC BusinessCenterlinitial Study Correct Formatdoc12
11. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
Issues and Su mn Information Sources
Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan
or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
a encies?
Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive
round borne vibration or round borne noise levels?
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
ro'ect?
A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the ro'ect?
For a project located within an airport land use plan or,
where such a plan has not been adopted. within two
miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project
area to excessive noise levels?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project expose people residing or working in the
ro'ect area to excessive noise levels?
Potentially
Significant Unless
Mitigation
tncO ora"'"
No
1m act
Less Than
Significant
1m act
X
X
X
X
X
X
8mments:
11. a.-d..: Less Than Significant Impact: The site is currently vacant and development of the land will result
in increases to noise levels during construction phases as well as increases to noise in the area over the long-
term. However, noise levels will be required to be within established noise level standards. No activities are
anticipated within the proposed project that would expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or ground borne noise levels. The project will create some noise levels over that currently emanating
from the vacant land. However, those noises are not anticipated to create a substantial permanent increasè in
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. The project may result in
temporary or periodic increases in ambient noise levels during construction. Construction machinery is
capable of producing noise in the range of 100+ DBA at 100 feet, which is considered annoying. However,
noise from construction of the project will comply with City ordinances regulating the hours of activity to
Monday through Friday from 6:30 a,m, to 6:30 p,m. and Saturday from 7:00 a.m, to 6:30 p.m. in industrial
areas. No significant impacts are anticipated.
11.e-f: No Impact: This project is not within two miles of a public airport or public or private use airport.
Therefore, people working in the project area will not be exposed to excessive noise levels generated by an
airport and no impacts will result from this project.
.
RID P12004104-0134 CBCBusiness Centerllnitial Study Correct Forrnatdoc13
. ,
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING, Would the project:
' Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Signifocant Mitigation Signifocant No
Issues and SuoDOrtina Infamiation Sources Imoact IncO.oorated Imoad Imoad
a. Induce substantial population growth in an area, either X
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension
of roads or other infrastructure)?
b. Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, X
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere?
c. Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the X
construction of replacement housinq elsewhere?
.
Comments:
12. a.: Less than Significant Impact: The project will not induce substantial growth in the area either directly
or indirectly. The project is consistent with the General Plan Land Use and zoning designations of Business
Park (BP) and Light Industrial (LI). The proposed project may cause some people to relocate to (or near)
Temecula to be closer to their place of employment, which is considered a moderate indirect affect. However,
the project will not induce substantial growth beyond what is projected in the City's General Plan. Less than
significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
12. b-c.: No Impact: The project will not displace substantial numbers of people or existing housing, as the
site is vacant property zoned for industrial development. Therefore, the project will not necessitate the
construction of replacement housing due to displacement of housing or people. No impacts are anticipated as .
a result of this project. f
13. PUBLIC SERVICES.
Potentially Less ThO. ""
,potentiallý Significant Unless
, Significant Mitigation Significant '1m":"",
Issues and SuoDOrtina IlÌfonnatian Sources ,'mood 'Incolt>orated Imoad'
a. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical X
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection? X
Police protection? X
Schools? X
Parks? X
Other public facilities? X
.
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Formatdoc14
Comments:
13. a, b, d, e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will have a less than significant impact upon, or
8ult in a need for new or altered fire. police, recreation or other public facilities. The development of the site
incrementally increase the need for these services. However, the project will contribute its fair share
through the City's Development Impact Fees to the maintenance or provision of services from these entities.
No significant impacts are anticipated.
13. c.: No Impact: The project itself is not creating residential use and therefore will have no impact upon, or
result in a need for new or altered school facilities. Development of the parcels within the project will not cause
significant numbers of people to relocate within or to the City. The cumulative effect from the project will be
mitigated through the payment of applicable School Fees at the time the parcels are developed. No impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
14. RECREATION.
a.
b.
Issues and Su rtin Inloonation Sources
Would the project increase the use of existing
neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational
facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the
facilit would occur or be accelerated?
Does the project include recreational facilities or require
the construction or expansion of recreational facilities
which might have an adverse physical effect on the
environment?
Comments:
PotentIally
S;gnmcant
1m act
Potentially'
Signmcant Unless
Mitigation
'Inco rate<!
,No
1m act
X
Less Than
Significant
1m act
X
14. a-b.: No Impact: The project will have no impact on the demand for neighborhood or regional parks or
other recreational facilities, or affect existing recreational opportunities. No impacts are anticipated as a result
of this project.
15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC. Would the project:
a.
b.
Issues and Su rtin Inloonation Sou,ccs
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the
street system (i.e., result in a substantial increase in
either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity
ration on roads, or con estion at intersections?
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
mana ement a enc for desi nated roads or hi hwa s?
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either
an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that
results in substantial safet risks?
Substantiall increase hazards due to a desi n feature
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Format.doc15
'Potentially:
Significant,
1m act
Potentially
Significant Unless
, ',Mitigation
IncO "'ted
, No
'tm act
LessThan
Significant
1m act
X
X
X
X
e.
f.
g.
x
x
x
.
Comments:
15. a.-b: Less Than Significant: There will be an increase in vehicle trips on adjacent streets once the
proposed project is developed. However, the City's Traffic Engineer has indicated that the project would have
a less than significant impact to the existing road system because the existing roadways have been developed
consistent with the City's General Plan in anticipation of the area's proposed industrial development. Due to
the project's consistency with the General Plan, no further traffic studies were required for this project. The
project will be required to contribute to the Traffic Signal and Street Improvement components of the
Development Impact Fees prior to the issuance of any building permits. No significant impacts are anticipated.
15. c.: No Impact: Development of this property will not result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks. This site is not
within the French Valley Airport influence area. Therefore, no impacts are anticipated as a result of the project.
15. d.: No Impact: The project will not result in hazards to safety from design features. The project is designed
to current City standards and does not propose any hazards. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this
project. .
15. e.: No Impact: The project will not result in inadequate emergency access or inadequate access to nearby
uses. The project is designed to current City standards and has adequate emergency access and will not .
interfere with access to nearby uses. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
15. f.: No Impact: The proposed project will meet industrial use parking requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the
City of Temecula Development Code. No impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
15. g.: No Impact: The project will be required to be designed consistent with adopted policies, plans, or
programs supporting alternative transportation. Therefore, no impacts will result from this project.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS, Would the project:
Potentially
Potentially Significant Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation. Significant Im~ct'.'
Issues and SupPOrtino Infonnation Sources Imoact Incoroornted Imnact
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the X
applicable Reqional Water QualitY Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or X
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new storm water X
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the X
project from existinq entitlements and resources, or are
.
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitiat Study Correct Formatdoc16
1.
g.
new or ex anded entitlements needed?
Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the ro'ect's solid waste dis osal needs?
Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and
re ulations related to solid waste?
x
x
x
Comments:
16. a. b. e.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not exceed wastewater treatment requirements,
require the construction of new treatment facilities, nor affect the capacity of treatment providers. The project
will have an incremental effect upon existing systems. Since the project is consistent with the City's General
Plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
16. c.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities on site that will connect to the existing system currently in place along Remington Avenue.
The design of the existing system is sufficient to handle the runoff from this project and will not require the
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects.
Drainage fees are required by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District to
reimburse the county for the Murrieta CreeklTemecula Valley Area Drainage Plan. Less than significant
impacts are anticipated as a result of this project.
.. d.: Less Than.Significant Impact: The project will not significantly impact existing water supplies nor
~uire expanded water entitlements. While the project will have an incremental impact upon existing systems,
the Final Environmental Impact Report (FEIR) for the City's General Plan states: "both EMWD and RCWD
have indicated an ability to supply as much water as is required in their services areas (p. 39)." The FEIR
further states: "implementation of the proposed General Plan would not significantly impact wastewater
services (p. 40)." Since the project is consistent with the City's General Plan, less than significant impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
16. f. g.: Less Than Significant Impact: The project will not result in a need for new landfill capacity. Any
potential impacts from solid waste created by this development can be mitigated through participation in
Source Reduction and Recycling Programs, which are implemented by the City. Less than significant impacts
are anticipated as a result of this project.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project:
Issues and Su ortin Information Sources
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a
fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population
to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate
a plant or animal community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal
or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California histo or rehisto ?
Does the roject have im acts that are individual!
R:ID P\2004\04-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Format.doc17
a.
Potentially
Significant
1m act
. Potentially
'S;gnificant Unless
Mitigation
Inco rated
LessThBn .
SignifiCant No
1m act I act
X
X
limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in connection with
the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future Droiects)?
c. Does the project have environmental effects which will X
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings,
either directlv or indirectlv?
.
Comments:
17. a.: No Impact: This site, which has been previously graded and is surrounded by industrial development,
does not contain any viable habitat for fish or wildlife species. This is an in-fill development and it does not
have the potential to: degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. No impacts are
anticipated as a result of this project.
17. b.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The individual effects from the project are
less than significant with Mitigation Measures incorporated into the project. The project will not have a
cumulative effect on the environment since the project site is an industrial area in an urban area, surrounded
by development. All cumulative effects for the various land uses of the subject site as well as the surrounding
developments were analyzed in the General Plan Environmental Impact Report. With the mitigation measures
in place, the project will be consistent with the General Plan and Development Code, the cumulative impacts
related to the future development will not have a significant impact.' .
17. c.: Less Than Significant Impact with Mitigation Measures: The projectwill not have environmental
effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, directly or indirectly. The industrial
project will be designed and developed consistent with Development Code, and the General Plan. Mitigation
Measures are required in order to reduce impact to a less than significant level.
18. EARLIER ANALYSES. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering program EIR,
or other CEQA process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or
negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following
on attached sheets.
c.
Earlier anal ses used. Identif earlier anal ses and state where the are available for review.
Impacts adequately addressed. Identify which affects from the above checklist were within the scope
of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state
whether such effects were addressed b miti ation measures based on the earlier anal sis.
Mitigation measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated,"
describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and
the extent to which the address site-s ecific conditions for the ro'ect. .
a.
b.
Comments:
18.a. The City's General Plan and Final Environment Impact Report were used as a referenced source in.
preparing this Initial Study. These documents are available for review at the City of Temecula Planning
Department located at 43200 Business Park Drive. Previously prepared historical/archaeological
R:ID P\2004104.()134 CBC Business Centerllnt!ial Study Correct Formatdoc18
...¡.¡ b .
.c.
.
.
studies were used as a referenced source in preparing this Initial Study. These documents are on file
with the Eastern Information Center at University of California, Riverside.
Not applicable.
The mitigation measures are addressed in the Mitigation Monitoring Program, which is attached.
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct Fonnatdoc19
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
SOURCES
City of Temecula General Plan.
City of Temecula General Plan Final Environmental Impact Report.
.
Historical/Archaeological Resources Review, prepared by CRM Tech and dated September 22,2004.
EnGEN Corporation, 1997, Fault Investigation, Existing Restricted Use Zone, Parcel Maps 24085 and
24086, City of Temecula, Project No. T1179-FS, dated August 29, 1997.
EnGEN Corporation, 1998, Updated Geotechnical/Geological Engineering Study, Proposed Expansion
of Business Center, Parcels 1 through 9 of Tract 28657, Diaz Road, City ofTemecula, Project No.
T1381-GS, dated May 4, 1998.
EnGEN Corporation, 1999, Geotechnical Report and Compaction Test Results, Rough Grading
Operations, Proposed Expansion of Existing Business Center, Tract 28657, City of Temecula, Project
No. T1381-C, dated June 9, 1999.
.
.
R:\D P\2004104-0134 CBC Business Centerllnitial Study Correct fonnat.d0c20
.
.
.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
CBC Remington Business Center
Planning Application No. PA04-0134 & 0136
(Development Plan & Tentative Tract Map No. 32113)
AIR QUALITY
General Impact:
The proposed project could potentially expose sensitive
receptors to substantial pollutant concentration and could
potentially create objectionable odors affecting a
substantial number of people working in the nearby area.
Mitigation Measures:
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant
shall verify that all earth moving and large equipment are
properly tuned and maintained to reduce emissions. In
addition, alternative clean-fueled vehicles shall be used
where feasible. Construction equipment should be
selected considering emission factors and energy
efficiency.
Electrical and/or diesel-powered equipment should be
utilized in-lieu of gasoline-powered engines.
During construction and grading phases, the project site
shall be watered down in the morning before grading
and/or construction begins and in the evening once
construction and/or grading is complete for the day. The
project site shall be watered down no less than 3 times
(not including the morning and evening water-down) during
construction and/or grading activities to reduce dust.
All fill being transported to and/or from the site shall be
covered and the wheels and lower portion of transport
trucks shall be sprayed with water to reduce/eliminate soil
from the trucks before they leave the construction area.
Specific Process:
Planning staff will verify compliance with the above
mitigation measure as part of the grading plan check
review process.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of a building permit.
Responsible Monitoring
Party:
Planning Department
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlMitigation Monitoring Program.doc
1
(
CULTURAL RESOURCES
General Impact:
Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological
or archaeological resources.
.
Mitigation Measure:
The Applicant shall enter into a pre-construction
agreement/treatment plan with the Pechanga Band of
Luiseno Indians, prior to the issuance of grading permits,
that sets forth 'and contains the terms and conditions for
the treatment of discoveries of Native American cultural
resources. The agreement /treatment plan shall contain
provisions for the treatment of all Native American cultural
items, artifacts, and Native American human remains that
may be uncovered during the project. The agreernent/
treatment plan may allow for the presence of Pechanga
tribal monitors during any ground-disturbing activities.
Specific Process:
Place the above condition of approval on this project to
require a pre-construction agreement/treatment plan
between the applicant and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians prior to the issuance of grading permits.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Planning and Public Works Departments
General Impact:
Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological
or archaeological resources.
.
Mitigation Measure:
The Applicant and/or landowner agrees to relinquish
ownership of all cultural resources, including all
archeological artifacts, that are found on the, Project area
to the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians for proper
treatment and disposition.
Specific Process:
Place the above condition of approval on this project so
that if cultural resources are encountered during grading,
ownership shall be relinquished to the Pechanga Band of
Luiseno Indians for proper treatment and disposition.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Planning and Public Works Departments
General Impact:
Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontological
or archaeological resources.
Mitigation Measure:
Prior to any ground disturbance activities a qualified
archaeological monitor will be present and will have the
authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in
.
R:ID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlMitigation Monitoring Program,doc
2
.
.
.
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
consultation with the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians
and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance
of any archaeological resources discovered on the
property.
Place the above condition of approval on this project so
that a qualified archaeological monitor will be present and
will have the authority to stop and redirect grading
activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Band of
Luiseno Indians and their designated monitors, to evaluate
the significance of any archaeological resources
discovered on the property.
During the grading process.
Planning and Public Works Departments
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Directly or indirectly destroying any unique paleontoiogical
or archaeological resources.
If any human remains are encountered on the project site,
all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the
discovery will be: terminated immediately and the County
Coroner's office and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians and Miranda, Tomaras, Ogas & Wengler, LLP will
be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains.
Place the above condition of approval on this project so
that if any human remains are encountered on the project
site, all ground disturbing activities in the vicinity of the
discovery will be terminated immediately and the County
Coroner's office and the Pechanga Band of Luiseno
Indians and Miranda, Tomaras, Ogas & Wengler, LLP will
be contacted to arrange for the treatment of such remains.
During the grading process.
Planning and Public Works Departments
R:ID P\2004104.()134 CBC Business CenterlMitigation Monitoring Program.doc
. 3
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
General Impact:
Expose people or structures to potential substantial
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death
involving rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
delineated on the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map.
.
Mitigation Measure:
Habitable structures shall be constructed outside the 120-
foot "restricted use zone" of the main fault trace which lies
along the western edge of Parcel 1, and development shall
occur in accordance with the recommendations set forth in
the EnGEN Corporation studies referenced in Initial Study.
In addition, proposed project will be conditioned to utilize
construction techniques that are consistent with the
California Building Code.
Specific Process:
Submit building plans consistent with proposed site plan
for the project that incorporate the recommendations of the
soils report and the EnGEN studies referenced in Initial Study
for Building & Safety Department review and approval.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of grading and building permits.
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Public Works and Building & Safety Departments
.
General Impact:
Unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading or fill.
Mitigation Measures:
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the
initial grading plan chèck and development shall occur in
accordance with the recommendations set forth in the soils
report and the EnGEN Corporation studies referenced in
Initial Study.
Specific Processes:
Submit soils report with initial grading plan check erosion
control plans for approval by the Department of Public.
Grading plans shall incorporate the recommendations of
the soils report and the EnGEN studies referenced in Initial
Study.
Mitigation Milestone:
Prior to the issuance of a grading permit.
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Department of Public Works
General Impact:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive
soils or earthquake hazards.
.
Mitigation Measure:
Ensure that soil compaction is to City standards.
R:IO P\2004104-0134 GBG Business CenterlMitigation MonitoringProgram.doc
4
.
.
.
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer shall
be submitted to the Department of Public Works with the
initial grading plan check. A registered Civil Engineer shall
certify building pads.
Prior to the issuance of grading permits and building
permits.
Department of Public Works and Building & Safety
Department.
General Impact:
Mitigation Measure:
Specific Process:
Mitigation Milestone:
Responsible Monitoring Party:
Exposure of people or property to seismic ground shaking,
seismic ground failure, landslides or mudflows, expansive
soils or earthquake hazards.
Utilize construction techniques that are consistent with the
Uniform Building Code.
Submit construction plans to the Building & Safety
Department for approval.
Prior to the issuance of building permits.
Building & Safety Department
RID P\2004104-0134 CBC Business CenterlMitigation Monitoring Program,doc
5
.
ITEM #4
.
.
.
.
.
Date of Meeting:
Prepared by:
STAFF REPORT - PLANNING
CITY OF TEMECULA
PLANNING COMMISSION
January 5, 2005
Matt Harris
Title:
Associate Planner
File Number
PA04-0359/
PA04-0365
Application Type:
Tentative Tract Map/ Home
Product Review
Project Description:
Recommendation:
(Check One)
CEQA:
(Check One)
A Tentative Tract Map (TIM 32104) to subdivide 5.23 acres into 53
single-family residential lots, 18 open space lots and one street lot and
a Home Product Review ("Ashville II") to consider the architectural
design and placement of the proposed homes within the tract. The
subject property is located at the northwest corner of Lake House Road
and Sarasota Lane within a portion of Planning Area 3 of the Harveston
Specific Plan area.
I:8J Approve with Conditions
0 Deny
0 Continue for Redesign
0 Continue to:
0 Recommend Approval with Conditions
0 Recommend Denial
I:8J Notice of Determination
Exempt from further review
0 Negative Declaration
(Section) 15162
0 Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan
OEIR
R,lProduct Review\2004\04-0365 Ashville l\\Final SuffReport.dot
PROJECT DATA SUMMARY
Applicant:
Greystone Homes
Completion Date:
May 20, 2004
Mandatory Action Deadline Date:
February 9, 2004 (With Extension)
General Plan Designation:
Medium (M)
Zoning Designation:
Harveston SP-13 Medium Density 2 (M2)
Site/Surrounding Land Use:
Site:
Vacant
North:
South:
East:
West:
Harveston Rec. Center/Lake Park
Residential
Residential
Residential
Lot Area:
5.23 Acres
Landscape Area/Coverage
N/A
Parking Required/Provided
106 Required/143 Provided
BACKGROUND SUMMARY
i:8J 1.
Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed,
and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval.
i:8J 2.
The application review has been completed and staff has determined that the
proposed project is consistent with the General Plan, City-wide Design Guidelines, the
Harveston Specific Plan, and the Development Code.
RolProduct Review\2004\04-0365 Ashville [!\Final Staff Repon,dot
.
.
.
.
.
.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Tentative Tract Map
Backqround
The Tentative Tract Map proposes to subdivide a portion of Planning Area 3 of the Harveston
Specifc Plan. The project is generally located at the center of the specific plan boundary adjacent
to the recreation center and lake park. The project site is served by two main ingress/egress
points off Logan Court and Lake House Road.
The number of residential lots and corresponding lot sizes associated with Tentative Tract Map
32104 are identified below:
AVERAGE LOT
TRACT NUMBER OF MINIMUM LOT SIZE MAXIMUM LOT SIZE
NUMBER LOTS PROPOSED SIZE PROPOSED PROPOSED
32104 53 2,624 Sq. Feet 3,744 Sa. Feet 2,825 Sq. Feet
Streets "A" and "B" traverse the project site and serve as one private street which provides
connection between exterior roadways. The streets have 30-foot wide throats at connections to
the exterior roadways which flare out and widen to 36-feet wide from curb to curb within the
development. The streets will have five-foot wide parkways and sidewalks on both sides of the
street within the overall 56-foot wide right-of-way. Three 24-foot wide access easements will
accommodate private alleys that will serve rear unit garages within the project. The garages will
directly abut the alleys. Units will either front onto Streets "A" and "B", exterior roadways or onto
landscaped greenbelts with pedestrian pathways providing access to front elevations.
Product Review
The applicant is proposing to utilize the same product types that were approved and utilized in
the Ashville neighborhood directly across the lake and to the east of the project site. Fifty-three
detached single-family residences will be constructed having nine (9) elevations and three (3)
floor plans ranging from 1,674-2,129 square-feet. Seven architectural styles will be utilized
including Monterey, Spanish, Italianate, Prairie, Craftsman, Cottage and Colonial.
Podocarpus and Bradford Pear trees will be utilized on various streets throughout the site. Eight
different varieties of trees will be utilized along the alleys and front yard areas within the project
including, but not limited to Photinia, Italian Cypress and Loquat. A large variety of accent and
massing shrubs will be incorporated along courtyard walls and pedestrian paths. Turf areas will
also be used along street frontages. All common areas outside of private yards will be
maintained by a Homeowners Association.
A combination of view fence designs will be utilized along the northern and eastern property line
to take advantage of lake park views. Fences, viewed by the public around yards will consist of
6-foot tall solid vinyl with decorative lattice along the top of the fence. Vegetated pedestrian
arbors will be placed at the ends of pedestrian pathways to enhance aesthetics and light bollards
will be utilized for illumination. Architecturally treated mail box structures will be dispersed
throughout the site.
R:\ProductReviewl2004I04-0365 Ashville l!\Final Staff Report,dot
ANALYSIS
.
Tentative Tract Map
Tract Desiqn
Both Planning and Public Works staff have determined that the street improvements within the
tract conform with all Harveston Specific Plan requirements. The Fire Department has also
reviewed the map and determined that there is proper access and circulation to provide
emergency services to the site.
The proposed 72-lot (53 units) tentative tract map is consistent with the City's Subdivision
Ordinance and the "Medium 2 Residential" land use designation of the Harveston Specific Plan
including lot area, width and depth requirements. The Specific Plan states that the intent of the
Medium 2 Residential designation is to "provide residential homes on average 2,500 square-foot
lots and will be targeted for small-lot single-family detached and small-lot single-family attached
town homes" (SP pg. 3-5).
With regard to project density, Section 3.0 of the Harveston Specific Plan identifies a density
range of 7-13 dwelling units per acre and a dwelling unit target of 330 units within Planning Area
3. The applicant is requesting to develop 53 units on this 5.2acre portion of Planning Area 3
which has a total acreage of 35.4 acres. When the proposed project density is added to existing
approved densities within the planning area, a total of 321 units is achieved in Planning Area 3.
Therefore, the proposed project density is consistent with the density range allocated in the
specific plan. No density transfers are being requested in association with the development of
h~~~. .
.
Product Review
Architecture
The applicant intends to utilize the same housing products previously approved by the Planning
Commission in May of 2003 in association with the Harveston Ashville project (PA03-0625). At
that time, the Commission and staff worked with the same applicant to achieve a variety of
modifications to the products including enhanced architectural treatments on all sides of third
story elements, upgraded stucco finishes and building materials, deeper eaves and enhanced
roofing materials to further improve the products. Staff has incorporated the same conditions of
approval into this project.
Staff has determined that the products comply with all applicable development standards of the
Harveston Specific Plan. In accordance with Section 10.4.1 of the Harveston Specific Plan, staff
has also determined that none of the nine architectural styles utilized for this project serve to
exceed the 20% maximum style threshold required in Harveston. Moreover, staff has determined
that the proposed home products are consistent with all applicable design guidelines as
specified in Section 10.0 of the Harveston Specific Plan. In addition, staff believes that both the
architectural plotting plan and elevation enhancement plan are logical and appropriate.
Parking
The Specific Plan requires that a minimum of two enclosed parking spaces be provided for each
of the units onsite. Two enclosed spaces have been provided for each unit. However, given that
.
R:lProduct Review\2004104-O365 Ashville Il\Final StaffReport,dot
.
.
.
the products have multiple bedrooms and no driveways leading up to the garages, staff believes
that on site guest parking spaces are necessary. Staff worked with the applicant to achieve 37
guest parking spaces onsite. Staff believes the on site parking is adequate to accommodate the
proposed project.
Landscapinq
The landscape plan including walls and entry statements conforms to the landscape
requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan, Development Code and Design Guidelines.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
~1.
The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously
approved EIR and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162
Subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations).
CONCLUSIO N/R ECOM M EN DATION
Staff recommends adoption of a Resolution approving the application with the following findings
and attached conditions of approval.
FINDINGS
Tentative Tract Map (Code Section 16.09.140)
1.
The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are
consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, Harveston Specific Plan and the
City of Temecula Municipal Code.
Tentative Tract No. 32104 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision
Ordinance, the Development Code and the Municipal Code because the project has
been designed for single-family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses
specified for this Planning Area in the Harveston Specific Plan.
2.
The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered
into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use and
has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts.
3.
The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map.
The project consists of a 72-lot Tentative Tract Map which includes 53 single-family
residences, 18 open-space lots and one private street lot on property designated for
Medium 2 residential use.
4.
The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
R:\Product ReviewI2004104-0365 AshviIle ¡!\Final Staff Report.dot
5.
The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land use assumptions of the EIR
prepared for the HaNeston Specific Plan.
.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause
serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building Departments and has been
conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of grading and construction will be
inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state and local codes.
6.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single-
family residences, the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building
Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for
energy conseNation.
7.
The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within
the proposed subdivision.
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The
Public Works Department and Community SeNices District have reviewed the proposed
division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the
Tentative Tract Map.
.
8.
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby).
The City's parkland dedication requirements are covered in the Development Agreement
approved with the HaNeston Specific Plan and the map provides public access to the
lake park.
Home Product Review (Code Section 17.05.010)
1.
The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all
applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposed single-family detached homes are permitted in the Medium 2 land use
designation contained in the HaNeston Specific Plan. The project is also consistent with
the Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly
planned, designed and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and
density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances, including
the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes.
2.
The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health,
safety and general welfare.
.
R:lProduct Review\2004\04-0365 Ashville ¡!lFinal Staff Report.dot
.
.
.
The overall design of the detached single-family homes, including the site, buildings,
parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and
intended to protect the health and safety of those living and working in and around the
site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be
consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to
ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with
the public health, safety and welfare.
ATTACHMENTS
2.
1.
Plan Reductions - Blue Page 7
PC Resolution No. 2005 -- Blue Page 8
Exhibits A - Conditions of Approval (Tentative Tract Map)
Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval (Home Product Review)
R:lProduct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville lIlFínal Staff Report,dot
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO.1
PLAN REDUCTIONS
R,lProduct Reviewl2004\04-0365 Ashville mFiual Staff Report.dot
~~~--{]
I'
sl'-';-' - ¡
~~g H~ ,i
~~~ II ~i1
-"~I¡
- .-------.-- -------~ - ------- -~-
i
.¡
¡Œ
m~
j;i:¡
un nn
un ~m
IIUlm
~m ~m m~
¡m m~ m~
nn Uti
m~
~m
!In mi ;m
¡¡¡Ii m¡ ¡¡I!'
, ,
~ , "
¡ I ¡¡¡IIIII!
~Im!
im~
mmm
0-'- ""' ..--
-.--> nn nn
0-", ,.., ----
"".,eo ",.,., .....,.,
,'" "'" "".
J'
z,
o~
.. ¡.. ~
... (/);
. ¡:~ ¡¡.¡;
} : >~
- -<~:
<~
Þ:'
.1
. I
,
,
i I' I i.,
¡;. "
If :
!-:J------
. _._------~- -.------..-.- -._---
----.. .-----
.~--_..~~
I
~;¡
~~ ,
<" J
0'" '
<0
~~ ,
~~ I'
.",
"',
Ii
u
~-~
'-~---~
, --,--
-"
---
I'
---T
I
I
I
I
i,
¡
¡
,,~!¡ "
~g", ¡, ,0
g~~ II: .
_.\~
"
II
¡¡
8
z
;;:'"
f-Z
<UJ
>u'
UJoo
...J '
UJt;j
!t~
~oo
"-
z-
""~
>";0
.. ""' ~
j ,r./J ~
-, f;¡; '
~< >'~
~OI: ;
<~
="
""'.
0,", !
'0 I
;.. ;
~~ ' '
~..
,'"
~
~~
~o
==
.
.
;
¡
I
ì
I
.1
0
I
,
i
I
J
,-"
--
-.
~
'"
-'"
>;2:
S¿Ô~
--",,0
ê3!;¡~
0. ~ -~-
"'¡...--
;;'i'"
'"
_r-o;
ii, i!¡~:~
11'11- ~ã~!¡[~;-' -r---'-!
01.. _Jr."- ¡
¡
:Zo
o~
'" ,..:
j oo~
;~r.iI ~
~ >~
"'0:: :
<~
="
"'
~~
.0
~=
~'"
"Z
<0
CO-.
-~~ -
~~ !
"..-',,-',- -",'.. -."'.,-'
<'--~ '""'" ~ ,.....-
--<~~~~~~ j-// ~//.
~, "'-~ ~'".,,/
.,,'~.. "DF\\-'" ~,"'.
"'~~
L\U fRO~T
GRU'"ØEL T
.
; ,\I Toml RI
f1((.~ - ~ -----
í -\~-=--='='~ '. ,
/ ' J .,' /.---'r.. V;<~\ t-~-'I- ~~,~~
, I ,'-.., . \.-- -'---1"', \
CONCEPTUAL
PLOT PLAN
A SH V H. L F
~T
.
.H A RVESTO N
"':' " I, \ "" \ "" " fill'
"\,,, If ,\ '.111(1"".\
.
.
:::J
¡¡j
;>
"'
..J
¡;¡
¡¡:
f.:-~.. -~-.. .:A........... /..... ~
I " . g
.'" .~.. -. ---------;^..... /. . ... . . '"
j( '" ./
\ // '\ . ¡----------¡ /. . I
-¥'-- -~-~ .. kG....~
.
0
D
0
~~~¡;
_!~
z '"
0 ~ :~
'" E-~ ~~
~'~¡ ¡~
<Ë ~~
::c:' r:J
~.
~ ~..
0
~
':
.,~ g
JI-"~!!,;;
..g. ¡;!,". g,
.. ; e:
~
-,.~_.._~ '
,"',,"
~.I'
, ,
. . 0
~L
g
~.
'"
5
~
z^ </>
0 ~ ~~
'" ¡...:: ~~
~.~:~ ~~
.~ ;r ~~.
=~ c;
r~~~-
II /}~-
Ll¿~---
k
I
I
I
I
I
0
~ ._m I
0
0
.
.
.
0
------.--.-..----"---
.
--'
'"
>
:J
1;;
'"
¡;:
---.
'---r---' --"--1
¡
----::;¡_.~
-7 I
-fLJD[
¡ I",
I ¡:¿
I ' ¡: >
--I. J2:E
<;..
-- ¡¡:
~
.:J
:z~
O~
'" E- r
..J ~
..,¡ ~o
;:¡;,;¡ ~
~ ;;. ~
'" =~
<~
:c:'
r~
k "
. '.
. . .).-~-
.J""" // ..
..'><
¡
JL,--- ,---.-----------
-~\1A l
,¡'-.j ~
~-71 --~¡~.
--lLJ
.
~~
§~~
-
'"
:;~
~~
~~
.~.~
"",
':>-
~'"
=",
<;
i "1
oL. :
--- !
---'-------- _--...:.:.:., C1
.C] -----.----....----------
0
0
. .
~~a 11m I
.¡¡[ILI.
~. Zo
:;: o~ ~¡;¡ .
1-<. ~ E-o~ ~~
~ .... ~~ ~j.
, ~...¡:,¡ > ~,,'..
¡:¡ ~..~~ j:
:< '" ."<
::E .. QI ~ ;~
I:J <~ ~~.
1= =" <
J!
~i
8
~,.,
0
i L ~. 0.' .
! i oU
[j
.
""'~:,,~'.',',-.-,,',-,'."':-"",.. ',,"',.:.,,",,""',.','
, ,j" ". ~.."", l~..
:, --,:~: "~" 1;
',.,'., '. , I~.'
',' i ,,!Jü' ..
':'-~~¡'.,"-.- ' r-":':""J'
,..,tJ.;.....IÎ,I,:,',..~..',., ..rr...i.,;..,;.,',:~. -:,::" .I'~.",I.¡,.;..~'.,'..".,..,'.,:" .'"
JI'-l . "~,..
, ' . .. ," ", , ,,',
"""ii¡;¡; '11'" ,,-......:;_.,m.._--:m,__.. ',' :'M"."-""-"
'~:~T"'¡;""lt'¡"'-'1Jl " ,..~,::'f;~..-,
;¡" ,~:!'ii':!;~:':;" '~'~ t,,:.'}~.t
t:~II!'¡ .Jlf 'I' '1
"~'lr"'"" .", II.' '" " , ",
[j; ~.,
.,~,~,;--
0
.
j¡¡~i'
.
'", z.
oJ o~ ~~
~ .. '-'~ ~Q
¡-. .... ... oz
.,¡, .... CI)~ 9~
~ :;: ~~; ~ ~ ¡
¡:: = >~ ~"
~. ~ ø=; ~~
, <~ ~~
=r
¡
I
I
I
!~O , '
it,)..J¡
[]
--
0
fl" f
H-L
u- ~
.=
'". x>
H ~~ :-~~
> < > ~ =" ~t"'
,.. .--« > -< .:~~
,,; ~t-J "';:: ~~.~
'". 000 ...
>; =.-3 "'-
~~ ~o
~~ ~z
..
-.
no -,-- --
-- --------- -- ~
...
-- 0
~
~
...
r
~
..--
-.-----
-..---- -
.
.
.
0
¡ jl'~;
II i . ~ i;; ,
I'"j! §~ II I
u . ~
0
.
~,',-',""'~. - "~-' .."3.:'.!~.-..'...'
~.-~-¡
.
, I
.
,,'
- c__"-::~~3,;:::"':;;.",o_~ ------..,-;
II
..,------------_U'
J!
Zo
0: ~;;;
. '" ...~ ~"
~ffi ~ OO~ ~~
;2;2 ~"f;¡i > <~,
j~ ~..:»~ j:
p.,,;, '" . - <
..: ¡:a:::. ~'"
<~ ~~
=1" -
,~
:~:
9
~ on
¡In
0
0
:J
0 .
<~~ jlß I
í1ilw ~ .
- ~
~:'J-¡
" 'I
~. i
!~ - Ii¡
t
~af
~
-~
~
!È
-~
ZQ ~
°ð ~~
::¡ E-<~ b
- = .., 000 ~...
3~~ ~... ¡:.:¡~ u::
~. Þ>< --, <"
. ~ == ....-. ~<
1'« ~ ØI;:: ; ~
<~ ~~
="
.
WÌ/~
f H: ..- " --. J
~
~
]
i! Nil .
¡ Lô I
0
0
0
II I l~I¡~J
¡fill. 1m I
.
!
t--
I I
'~
5
l~-
, ", ,..Î,D.. '
1 !ifi
i ~ m
L_i '
.
Ii
ii
11
I
I 'z
I ,0
I I i
J,
-~
-r" i ~
I I
..
I '
I
L
I
.
¡¡
d.
0'
~ !
¡ ~ I.
' ! I I
-
z '
0: ~;¡
~ E-<~ ~~
-z .. fIJ~ Sj
3~ ~... ,-p ~z
~ .. '" ""e, -
~ II: >~ i..
""" ~ ~: ~~
, , <; ~~
="
~ f-n
" II
In
0
---"----'-"--'._- '__d ,..,- '----"---'-."_-"_"_--":".'--------'______m~___-"' ,--..,---..-..--.-----.,,--...,..........-----. "
:J
~\¡; .'
~H
,:
0
~,.~-
"'_n
..., ._,...." "..
. "-ccco,"cecc," --"',.- -
~- :þ -=+
~_..,---,-,- ."'- ,..
:J "-~~-,,-,..
"--"-'-'---'-"-
--- -
0
.';
.ill~ ! .
~
~
g¡
z. -
O' <"
¡"' E-<~ ~~
-~ ;:3 (I)~ ~~
~<ti'~"'Ii<1~ "3
Hh~<>~ ~~
~ù ~ ¡¡¡: : ~~
¡ <~~::
=r
~
~.
.
~(ïl.
fro
0
, on,----.. .. .... ,
.
.
.
0
~....~. .
, .
, .'
.~. '_J.LJ ¡ ! .il
i!
Ii
~
~
Iii
~
¡;¡
,i
:J
. 0
I j. I'm I
II I . ~ I ~ .
IIdl § ii'
~
ZQ
o~ ~¡;;
~ E-<~ ~~.
-~ '" rn~ ~j
~¡: ,....,. ¡.:¡~ ~Z'
~~ ~< ~~ j~
..V., ."<
< ~. ~z
<~ .z
=~ ~~.
~
~
§
! -n
,doH
,L,
0
.... --,... ._n- -..... . u
:J
t-
]
0
iilœJ .
I
I
~
~
z. -
, OE ~~
. ~ E-<¡¡ h
~~..,.,oo.~...
;;s<.¡ ~... ¡:,;¡~ u~
;:¡h~<>~ ~~
0.. Ù ~ ~; ;~
<° .'"
== "...
.
~
~
I
I
I
I
.~ Tl
ò !-H
H.u I
0
.
0
.
~...
¡~.'~:-~- ¡ i ->il
.
.
]
. ¡
L!!!
~! I ~I 1'1 '
~I ¡M IÐ~
"ill II
IIUilii
I, f II
¡ I
.-
0
1I1<~~I!rJ '
lid! a 1m ~
- . ~
ZQ -
0: ~;;;
~ ...~ ~~
~~ ... fIJ~ ~,j'
z~ ~... r_'. 'z-
<8 >-<-= "-.
o! 1%1 >~ ~ '"
..u ~ ~~ ~~ -
<~ ~~-
="
~ ~ T.l
joH
./ j
0
-Ii . - .:':" .
. fir!
] . . -
:
0
--h~~~_..'~=..-:- .:-:.~.._~"--...-.--
p
,'-~~-- _u_--
~
!
--
----
~
~--
-
-
ilif'l ~
Æ ~ .
Zo
¡ OJ 05 ~¡;¡
'.., ¡..< .Ø
3-8~'" oo~ g~
~., ;:... f;¡;l" ~...
",ò~=<~i ~~
,-,'~ ØI:: B~
-<;; 2Z
=; ~~.
-.--------..
¡¡ .r..
JI:H
- ,lJ
I
C
--
.
.
.
.
.
'J
~..j
I:
,I
]
~! gIll
~I biB
!hl
n ---------- - "'--------_-..n_- --------,------ -
fJ
I ~¡.~ ~
In ~ i ~ j
,¡ ~~ J
1','1' gw! I_' ~
U - .lJJ ~
Zo
0: ~;;;
'" E-o~ ~Q
-! ~ rn~ g~
z -""1';1" ~~
:"i -- ;.. <......; <'"
o..ó : .....~ ~~
< ~~ ;~
<0 .~
t:rI~ "...
~ or-,
iLb
0
------..---------------
0
'~
~'
- '
:,", ~
" ,," ,,' ,---------" ' '
''i'",+-m-;.~"""""""""",:"" L"" "'(,',":"'/"",'","",.
'/' :r~
/ ,'" '
- " " ' ,h.t
" ,', ' ~
~
~
:J
-0
§~! I!í~, '" J
all[lj,[ .
J
, z
. O~~;;¡
-~,~ E-<: ~ZA
~i!I,,'" tI.J~ ,~
;::¡~t>~f;¡;"¡~ ~~, .
",II .: >~ 1;
.. ~. Uz
<~ h
=~ ~:
~ ~ T]
I i-r¡
.u
.
-0
.
.
]
0
~..-...~;..,"-,:,-"',"".','i",¡
, .,., _':'_'~ - ¡
'- ,-' i '
"" --..'..---
:'/ ,
'i I z
!, I, 0
'il I ' í1
Ii C ~,I ~
"IT ~: ~
I,': "I 'I"
'I
I' Ia.j.,¡ I
¡¡~i
Ii I' ¡
:, I
Ii L
'I
I,
I,
"
"
. .)--
~I ih~
~I ~~Ii
Ud
J
. 0
I j I~ i
III . ~ i:; ,
Ilûl § 111 :
Zo
0; ~;;;
= ....: ~~
~. >4 r/.)~ ~<
zo ~I-<M> ~~
<~ ><""". ~
~d ~ ~~ ~ ~
« ~~ ;~
. <~ ~~.
="
! ,!",fl
I Hi
R ~u
'z
ß
.~
~
0
0
0
i ,~.ii . '
~ ~ ~ -
Iliw I
. ¡.
~
I
I
I
I
Zo I
0= ~;;;
~ '" E-<~ ~~
"'<,:: fIl~ ~j
:<;;~~ ~... ,-,. ~z
;:¡~. >< -= .,-
0.."" II: ;>~ ""'I
. ~"' . °<
., ø::. ~z
<~ ~~
="
I
I
---
ì
L
I
0
~
~
I
I
I
~ J -r: I
j Jj,
. [~
--_._--- ._---"--'--------'~-'--'---_._'.
..-----..--- .------ ..... C,- --"' ...
_.----"--~_._--'-'- .
.
.
0
.
t
-- -------------
.
.
t
i-
I
: ----r: '
I
I
I
.1 Li
ijl:"¡: [, -' I,
_l~IUi LJ
I~'
;~;
:;1'
0
[j
II I'~ 1¡~' J
1M JI.! ill ;
~
Zo
0: ~¡;;
'" '--'~ ~"
~ ... C""~ ~z-
N< ... r/: o ::;~
3-~ ~... ,~» ~z
- ~ ;.-: -" -
, ~ J:I: ,...' j",
""~. ~ ~: ~~
" .z
<~ ~~
="
~n
¡Lo
0
=:J
~
I
; I
, I
., ,
~
~
"""".'."'.""
]
<~~ I~ 1
¡'¡rut.
~.
Z'
0: ~;;¡
N~ ::: ~~ È~
:>j~""" 000 ::;<
,:¡~g >~I";l~ jg
"'~ .: >: ~~.
.. -< ~~ ;~
<~ ....
=;; "...
I
I
I
I
I
.. I
H".f!!
PT1!
.-1 i
. I
0
.
.
.
.
.
0
¡i
'¡
I
! ~
0
?5
¡::,
5
§
I
. I
-'
l-.,-
~LJi j U' I I L' ;
.I_i..,.: ~j
0
, ~ iffi I
II I ~ '~ I
I!,"¡!§ ¡. I
U aRt .
3
Zo -
o' <..
'" E-<~ ê~
'" . '.<
N~ '" 000 "...
~,~ ;~ ~~ ~~
~~ ;;; >: ~~
" .. i:III~ ;~
<g ~:f
="
~ -11
0 LH
P.L!
0
0
0
..'"
~_.
~
:'j
~
IJJ
~
:'j
m
0
41'r-' I
l ! ~I Ii
9 IlJJ f .
~
Zo
0; ~;;¡
"",;::; E-<~ ~~
~~.,.... oo~ '<
~~ ~... ,~'" ~...
8" Þ-< -" oz.
"'ó -: >~ ~;
.., ØI:- ~z
<~ ~~.
=r
~ J "II
j f'H
.Lj I
c
.
.
0
.
.T
j,
"
.. ¡
.
¡i..
.1
. ..! i .
. . . ,..,1,1. . Jii
'.-..".-- .'._.'~"-~_._-~_.". ,-....
0
0
! JÎ.I¡~ I
Iii ~,;¡ ~
Ihil g~ ¡ ~
~
Zo
o~ ~;;¡
o¡ ...~ ~"
Ni3 j (I)~ ~~
~e ...,.. ¡,;j" ~""
;:¡S >< ¡¡ .:
"'<> ~ >~ 5 <
... ~. ~'"
. <g =~
="
~. f .'rl
J :tJ
.D
.., ...
=:J
~ .
"
(
I
I
I
I
I
~
5
~
g¡
.
~
~
:::J
0
<~~ ir~. J '
IAlla¡ ,.
~.
Zo
o~ ~¡;;
. :: E-<~ ~~
",~". ~ t:I}~ 0..
~g~~"J:¡;l> ~~
:Js¡;>< ; <-
"'.I- ~ i>~ ~~
« ¡:¡:;~ ;~
<¥ ~~
="
ì! .~
q-H
R. "c.J
0
.
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
0
.
I' III
I II
.~"
.
Ii
0
0
Ii I ~B 118 .
ihililim I
ã
Zo
0: ~¡;;
~ E-<~ ~~
"'~ '" oo~ ~j
;s~.-...,-,> ~:z..
::is ,.." -" -
'" u;;; >~ ~.~
." ø:;~ ;~
<~ ~~.
=- .
..
~-'1
¡Lb
D
I
0
0
r...
~.
1
. .
. ..
._u_..__._n..... un.
~
~
c
~~~ j~ ~
JilmJle
.
ZQ I
. o:~;;
o¡ E-<~ ~"
.N I.... ~ ~z
. ..... t'l)Q -<
; ~ ~.... r_" ~...
;::¡ o' > -< -" oZ
"'u 0 III >;¡ ~~
~ ~ ~~ ~~
<~ E~
þ: : "...
f -,-
¡I.H
.l!
[
- ..- .---.-.-
--...-..--...-.-- ......_...
...-.----
.,
.
.
.
.
0
1.
I
I
_I
--.. '-"""---""'.m'
0
0
¡ w I'illl
III . ~ !~ ~
¡fin Ii ¡ I I
3
.,
Zo
o~ ~;;¡
01 '--~ ~"
. ~ .., <""'~ ~z
.""" ... (1)0 :¡j
"-e ~... f;I;1" ~z
~ð ~ <: >~ :I;;;
" ~ ~; ~~
-<° ...
== ,~-'
~'fn
h:d
c
0
I
:J
. ...
.~
~
~
~
'--0
jj"~ ~
~ r' j
~~ IUJ I.
~:
§
~
¡;¡
Zo
0; ~;;;
'" E-<~ ~Q
"'l .:¡ {I:J~ g~
~~:i ~E-< ¡:.¡> ~~
¡d~g ~< ¡;;.~ j~
'" ~ ¡:¡;: B~
<~ ;..
=" ~~
~ .,..,
If-HI
.,...J
¡j
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
.:
0
.
~.~
~3
,
i !
I i
' I ~
i!!L-
.
~,"'
.
0
0
I ,,¡ "ill"
I¡ I "I;:¡.
Ibil.Ll¡ If I
~
Zo
0: ~;;¡
~ E-<~ ~~
""~ ... 00: "<
~~ ~... ¡:r¡> 5~
~g ~ < i>~ i~
,0 ~ ~; H
<~ ~'"
="", '"
-,
~ Tl
" -H
j .LJ
[
0
,'~---------
0
i-
_L"L-
, ------:-,-c..==--n
,';:-,
f
f
---
---------
f
i
0
w Ilill- ~
§~~ I: ~ ~.
_iÜ ,'.
~-
- - '-j ;,
z.
c- - - >I o~ ~;;;
_M~- ... ....~ ~~
, ~ ;.;:-'" 00. ~<
.~ ¡g-;:'" ¡,ii' ~...
...~:" III <: >; ~3
-.-"),- ~ ~: ¡¡~
-- .é;"
=~ ~~-
.
-.,;-
:;
¡¡ .r'
Jl+1
--: --,u
C
.
~..........--~--
-"--
-----------
.'"'-----
.
.
.
0
",","1
: ; Ii ~
:1 §ii, \
. III,! ¡ Ii
., I fl,h: '~!dn
I ill limn
0
! ; I~'r
III ,~ Ii ~
I/dl II! I
Zo
O~ ~;;¡
':; ...~ ifi
"'; .., Cl.)o -<
3~ ;: ~ r..1~ 5g
'",~ : >~ ~:¡
.'« ~~ ~~,
<~ .'"
=;; -..
,.
~'t ~n
0 I
I tj
""""",.,..",.
0
0
:J
:::::J
HI
-li
M---" --_!_';~
i - - ~
I -
I
I
--_.~-1
lL__-
-- --,-
i__. " ,- --
_..,,-,- -
,-_..--,., ---,'-,-
§
~
j~ ~'Q__i,D
,I I '
1m f .
§
I
z.
- o~ .;;;
"'I ~ E-<~ ~~
:5_- ~... [ )~ ~ <
-:¡: ~ ;: ~ ¡;.¡~ ~~
"'~.: ~~ ~~
-< :Iii. Uz
<~ =~
=: "",
.
I
i
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
i .n I
11:0 I
--.,-.-,'--,.- ,--,,-- - - 0
"-',-'
.
.
.
.
0
ill!
~ Ii' :
~! Iii!! ¡
'Inll
. I;.
~'
Ii!
f
II
¡¡
II
:i.
I
I
:J
~
.<
~
~
0
II I <~~ !~ '
mn JI ¡ lJ]
~
Zo
0: ~;;¡
. ~ ...~ ~~
~~.='"~:~~
;:¡~ i>... -" >
",> ~ ;>~ "'"
. ~ ø=;; H
~o .'"
tt " "...
~ -n
~ J . I
I rü
0
D
!ì
, ..
-.F
!'i
~,
I
0
0
¡I'D! I
~ 'I a ,
~S I,ffi ~.
~
Zo
, 0: ~;q
:f E-<~ ~~
"'~'" '" oo~ ôj .
:OSJ~,,', ~""¡,;¡~ ~z
;:¡g ~ ~., >~ :j~1
1'<0, '" ~. B~
.. ....~ ;§
<" .'"
=~ >~
I
,
~-'-!
"J I '
111,
D
.
"'n_~___'~'_",-,---- ---------..-----------------.-------------- "-"'--------------
0
.
"
.
.
0
0
I I '~ ~
ill '. ~ ¡~ ~
¡hi! .L I ,
. ~
:2=;0
0: ~;¡
. ~ ....~ ~~.'
..;~ .., rI)~ ~..
~.~ ~..~~ 5~
..::'18 ~ -< ~~ :1:
""'" '" . °<
. .. .~~ ;~.
<~ ~~
=1" .
~ "n
i to
0
]
0
lL
.-
-.
~
~
.-.---..
--.. _._"-~
.,_."..
- --
, ------
0
<~ I!í~.' I
.I¡ill i .
~
~
~.
Zo
OJ OS ~;;;
«>. ... ~~ ~"
~~ ,... oo~ ~~
.~~ :;:0'" ,-,- ~...
8-~<"'" uZ
!'<ó.:= ¡;.; ..-
~ ~: ~~
<; h
=; ~::
.
I
,
~ rl .
jLr1/
f.c..J I
I
0
---..-...,--
....
.
.
0
0
~. '---t~.-r--...
" - "
--.'-.n ..~..-..-.~...... ---'.. .: - ~. i.~
. ~-L - --; , ! ~
Iì
,-
f.
-I ~~.
L~
¡;
¡¡
i:
. -----..-----.---
-----"-----
0
II I<~~ '¡Pi I
¡hit linn Î
3
Zo
O~ - ~;;¡
'" ~ ::: ...~ ~~'
~ < ... ¡no ~ <
~... .. ~"'
..¡§ >-<IiI;l~ o~-,
'" Û ;:; >~ ~ ~
-< ¡:¡:;. ~:z
. <~ ~~
=" .
~ r:l
1 f +1
L,
0
-..----..
0
-__m_~____-,--
- -------------
--------------- -
_____m_---'-~"------ .-
- ---------......--...--------,----
.-.----..-
0
"
~
~
0
<~~1 0 --!
JI iw I .
~
~.
!
Zo
o~ ~;;;
.. E-<~ ~"
M 3 ~ ~~ ~ ~
-:;;;¡z:i- ~... M" <;;1
-;:¡s.- ;;.... -= ~-
....8-..,-= >~ .'"
-ò- ~ ~; H
<~ ~::
1:1::"
.
~',¡ .
! J +~ I
! 01 I
--I
0
--_..,,-- "----- --~----.-_------,-,--------------- ------------..------------ . --------------" ".- - -----
.
.
.
0
..J.. I ~
'i
-
0
0
II I ~~ !¡~ !
1M sJim!
~
Zo
o~ ~:Ö-
'" ¡..o: ~~
"'i j rJ'j~ ~;:¡
z -...~> ~z..
:is ~<>~ j;
0,'6 ~ ~; H
<° ...
=~ >~
~ -r-
it~
0
0
---m_--______m .,
~
!iI
~
- _n.-- -.-
~
~
~
0
_--_"..m
n.._.-
--.---
--------
----,----
--. '.__n-
0
411~! .
z -
.. 02 ~;;;
"'3 '" E-<~ ~ ~
~X, '" t/J° ~<
;:;¡s.- ¡;:.. [;1;1> ;"'
;"8"=< i ~:!:
ò '" >. ~'"
< =;: B~
<~ >z
=~ ~~
,
I
I
I
.
i I:B I
c
.
..-
0
.
it
¡, ï
..~! lilll ¡
~'I:I~i¡
, II~¡I!
.
[I
.
0
P
III <~~ !~ '
1/¡j!JI ¡rni
"", j
z
, 0: ~..
~ E-<~ ~!i.
'" ~ '" oo~ ~j
~.' ~.. M" '".
;::¡S Þ-..:-= v-:
"'.~ ~ >~ ~~'
. ..: ¡:.::~ ;§,
-<! ~~
=:="
.0"
~ rn
j JJ
o.
PRODUCT REVIEW PLANS
HARVESTON
CML.~
.... CCINIIL TNII
21&&1> Y>I!Z IOD. I!Urre .-
TEMECULA, CAL~IA !l2M1
(O&U ""'-8/N2 .... ,O&U ""'-12~ ,..
c::a<rACT. ....., Jc>I'n To..-
I"IMtM ~
........ CCII't1HT88
...1 NORrH HADoI "_eT. I!Urre ...,
caoc:>NA. CA. ...-
(O&U8l1--"" (O&uan-......,..
c::a<rACT, .............. L! I'ICh
8IJILI:>E!IItI
........ IILAIØ 11/ CII8Y81Q8 MCiI'8
- Ca.NTY CÐ<II!R DRM!. "TE. ""
TEMEcu.A. CA !12M)
(0&0'111-10464",,(0&1)_-640&'..
c::a<rACT. Mo. ""'11- .....dIN
~.
~ ~,:n. ~ N:.
2"'"'2 -- c:eNTI! 0.... "T!! '"'
1-' CA ...,,'"
(""~"",_"" (""~""-"'I! ,..
c::a<rACT, ....., Gr-e """ilia III
LAND8C... ~ .
0;I0'fC ~T ~1D, N:.
41&'1'1 ~ØE CIIOCLE NORTH SUITE -
TEMECULA. CALFQfONIA .........
(0&0_'_",,(0&1)2Mo.SöI'..
c::a<rACT, ....., DaVId """".IL
.
Tent. Tract No. 32104
~ I<I!Y I"w-
.
ASHVILLE II
City of Temecula, Ca.
~ VICINIn"
(I
8IoBT IIÐ8>C
TITIJ! &H£ET
TYPICAL FIOI:>NT Y AIOD"
OÆN 8f'Ac:e LECiIENO",
OÆN 8f'Ac:e 1.ANO6c:AÆ
ØEc:TlON&
WALL I'LAN&
C<ON&TRlJCTICN oeTAlL&
~ü
-
--.w_--
.
I
2
.
4-&
",
'-a
9-'"
W.?iJft
:¡ji
.......-
=-::- .:!
0,:::--'"
:......--
<I: ¡j
i{j
I!~
~&
iç
õ
~~~
C )~-;¡
i~1
2~1I !
. ,~¡¡ 'ij
=~Šhi
j f~h
il~bf
e
~~-
,--
-.-
-
'MoO
L-l
." -
....
w
~
w
¡:!
;:
9"I'tOI.W. ......... -
~r-.NI11 ¡1I¡i!.I' wrw~~
Q~1-tI111 III õ'. ~1\'1::)¡ . ¡ J,:IO ..lJ.1:;)
.....>Ii_Y-
.."",... ...... III.... ':œ-;;-~--"~--- !
,..:tK.,:;'Jo,":L L N
""_""""'""'""~- r I I
- """J&O!> liS ""'"" .........., J I ! II ...J 0
NOJ.9~ . II a11/J\H9'9' ! f ! I ,
.
.
.
III ...... ...... ..... I ! II.
II! WW Jm IUH II I !III!
IJ IIII I, 1IIIh I "
In 11111 ml IIIII! II I III! II
I ,I
:IIIIIIIIIIJ IIIII ~ I II IIII
." . mil
.t
I
r
i
.,1 I
in
~
9CKIœ1 """de NBoIO
'~'t.J I ¡"¡i!i' ...",...:.;-~
~~UJjll ill ". ~æ:u_,?_ÅJ.I::I
~
I
I~
I
, . . "
I
I I I
I I I III df1
I .I. I! I I
II , I !
""""'d""'" "'"" ";:;-œ:;~--"~--: t
"'K-""L """" ...
,..... .-:> """'"""! !'
,." -- '-"", .-0::> R>uno:> ....... ~ "I. II J ..J
~9~~311'ãïø;= ~ lifl!;
I I
II
-i
I II ...... ...... ..... ¡!!I.
I ! II ! II !mll wm lUll III I !!II!
II I I II IIIII II II 11111 I I
I II I III! II
II I II III Illhl !II,II III
lid I I I I
5 I III II I 1111 1/1 , lli
If! 11111 1111 ~II
I Ii II ill II III I 111111
~0.$ 00e . . } ~I
I
,
i
.
II
Iii
~I
.
.
.
'ONIJHV1d !Þr<19 N'WO
-o::lIj I'j. ' ,...........
;;" ., I I -..._""""""'"
ð~ JI'1 Jd'!d 1f1n::>aJ.SJ. :k:) ..l.ll:>
. .....",o.uy-
"'þ.'.d""" "".... ':æ---"~--': !
CO""-"L ,...., ,
,..... """'."""""'L I'
...,-"""""""-:>~- ! III, ¡11¡-1
~9~:3Iíãìi= ~ JllfI;
.
i>
. \~
\ \~
\
\
.
.
!
I
I
t
'Î
I.
I
- ---.--.----.-
...."..,.,.. ~d9 NSWO
n; ;.iljf¡IO¡j -..~~
~~ 1¡ldd'!U 't1n::>3I-SJ. ~ .u.1?
. I """"I^UYJHI1
"",.,.......,. "'ow .:-~-_..~-_.-ú\ !
"'K-OIL ,"""'¡ I ¡
,"",. """ ""n08W8 . I.
.."-.,g"""",...."R"",,,,- 1,1-1
~9~~3Iïãìi= !! j f I ;
!
I
I
t
!¡
I.
I
/
,.-
/'
,.-
~
,.-
~ I =] r I ~I
~ ~ I ,Jil]!
R ~ !! ,Iii '!I!I!!!
I ! Inn' I ~
\ " aIlIPJJHlJhd
. \ gHlfHLllHIH
: ~\
.
.
.
.
.
ØNOt~aø
'9=1J;.iH.!1I,o'i' ~~~.:...........
>~ II.
gÐ. 1111 111 ". '9'1ro3J.GJ. ,¡o ..ul::l
""""""'YUGIL
'"IP..Od....,. r;".... ':œ -_..~--'- !
1":"',.:;'~I=i ~ 'P
0011 - '",,'<] '"'""" I\1iño::> ....... ~ ~ I ! III i -!
~9~~'lïâTII; ~ ~! i I ~
it -
"
, \~
"
\~
~
~! t
l m
@
<I(
~¡ . f
~ ! ~
trh I
t'I' I
,IDII "I'
l'UlIHIM
III! Iii ill J
l~! I
t ,I
I~¡ II
III i!
l'
~~
~
¡::: '"
0 .
m t
ED l---------'l'
{
"""'TMI\
~t1'ßHlf ¡iI,i!i' 9NV1oI":,z-=<XIOW
8~11 ¡ !II iI. 'f1ro3l-S1' o AJ.I::>
..... '" "",y",",
""'."d ""'" Iù.... .:o-::-~-_..~--- !
"""'-OIL '0Ø6' '~~ I ¡ Õ
,..'" ..'1'?~lnoewo. l !'
ØI'_'"^"""",,",,'_~...- r -1
."""'" """.."""" Iii CIN'I"1NI ~ IS:; . ! ¡ ! fl'
NOJ.9~H . II a111AH9't . ~ j. .
III dl
IIÎI~I II~I
~1!lil~ ~!
Ii ~! I;i ~i Ii I II!
5 i~ ,! hll~ ;~! ;I!
Illil~5lddÎ ill
I;! III-
æ i i ê
= i i ê
i i .. ¡
<01-
~¡. f
~ ~
!H f
~I I
Ir
~I
.
.
N'r1d 11m
D~~ :il,1 ¡iI,i!'I' -...~~
" ~I ¡ !If u. "'11'031-13.1 dO .lJ.1::>
..............-
""".'.d OW\>' r;".... :œ- -_.""-:'---: 1
"""'-OIL '0Ø6' '^'
'"<I; """OIl""""'"' I I
"""'19'.""<1"'" ~""""- ~ ~I II! ¡ -I
iëT9~H;',rrn= ~ J J J I J ;
.
.
.
III dl
IIil11 III
IM~ ~!K
~i ~s II¡ íÌ Ii ills
t ~. !llit. id~ I ¡,I
It t~Þ .!qla~Þ
I Ii II HI d ~Il :11
lEI '~IIIII
æ ¡ i I
i ! ¡ i
"
, 1n"'!iICI NOI!::nu9NO:)
V5[1j!fIIl¡¡~ I' -..~~
{1 ~ .11 I",
CI~. 'J!,!!!". "t~~~_ÅlI::¡
~~
m r~~
~~
.!
~ i~
, Û'
- 1¡
f "\1'
, ~ Ii
ii
Ii~
~~Ie
h~ f
nil I~§ I
!ldßII
e 1.9 e
"I""." """" "'ow ':;:;(Ð~ ~-_.,~--:!
Ø'K-6IL '0Ø6' "~ I u'
I..œ ...\,?.!I=-<>! II I I ' .
øu_'.^I"'~.._-~- ~ -!
9"""'" "",,!9""""" I" aN'I'1NJ >MtG1 'SIi ! ¡ ]. J .
NOJ.9~ . II aT11AH9'9' . ~ I ! . ,
~
L
~
,.
.",
0
i~~;! 'IlL
jt , i MIIIILI ' I,
11~.b ! L I," . " ä II I
'Wf' "~ IIPI[II II
I, ¡ ~>I~I' I II!'I-II
;,"' . ~ ¡'I Ihll! I
I I [iM ',' , , I ZI ø!hlwl,1I1
I "~I'I -,'II': .-
~ " -" " .'1 ~, I. ¡ 'I I
~ ¡, I, ~ ¡, '\ II,~
~ .
! 1, I ..
., '~II ill II ~ II~ ~I
I¡~ ~~;il ¡~II !i§ I
! ~ 1li ~;jl 1M 111 !
I
I
;.
.
~
IU
~
~ .ø-,g -+ :
~
!
! II I
I'- iu :III ~
H jl!11 I
~:!H~lIe ~
e
f8
I
!
~ J
.
~
I
,
I
.
III
.
.
.
9'1"'Ud NOIL:II'OI19NO=>
fgt1/AHljl ¡1I,ili' -..~~
ß~j ¡II ;¡. 'f1J'l:)EIW3J., O..IJ.I::)
.....",-y",",
""""'d""" "'.... .::;O:-..~-_..~--~ 1
""'-6Il ,...., '^~ 1-
,..œ ..\'?.!I-. II f I'
..., ..,., 'M,'O '"'""" "--,, - ~ ...J
ç....,.. """.....;M> 113 at<o'1NI -, ~ ! ! !. I .
NOJ.9~ . II :n11AH9'1t . ¡ R . ,
ë¡>
Jï
Š
" .
~
0
~
<r::
~
0
¡:¡:¡
d
~
@
" .
<II
I
I
J
@)
~
ji'
Š
~
0
~
~
E-<
¡z¡
~
ß
p..
O=O~~W~~u(Q)~
ASHVILLE "
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 32104
C~1ty (Q)1 r~Mi~(6j~I~, C(Q)~i"i1ty (Q)1 fü~%'~~~~d~, Sit~t~ (Q)1 c~m(Q)m~~
J~
>
.
\ .
fí
ti(~.v
)1(
II
,\
I
i ;"'~:~ ¡~
AlLEY SECTION
.~~. ~~;?i~-,~,'
"'î" "" I~~-----
STREETS 'A' & 'S' ":::"::".~
~ ~ WÐ
~.'1;" miîl¡¡¡¡Î!E!
~~
.~"AACB."""'"
-_........,._,_.
""""",""."" NOIE
~~
-
. ===:
---
---
-----
-----
..
N.
u. ~"""'~._~o..~
n. r~":H"'¡¡'~~M..,=\\"g,.
~-
:=-":'.="
--""-
PIAN SHEET
HARVESTON
ASIMllE n
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 32104
CllyolTernecula
.,,--=~~
m,,___..
~_._.- ~
. .. =,~~:':';::... f
.....=.. -....--..-,.,,--.. \..~..."
GREYSTONE HOMES
_"","",CÐmII"""""""
.......,.....00\-
===
1
" Í-
.
.
.
\
i
ì
¡
¡
j
!
!
I
~
ASHVILLE II
LAKE
PARK
HARVESTON
LAKE
CLUB
T.T.
53 UNITS
37 ON STREET
PARKING SPACES
ElEVATION lEGEND
M -
. ..,.
I "~'_n
p -~
CR ~
COT. =..
CO<. -,~
I.£GEND
. --""",,-a.....
~
~ MAP
Ú~.- ::~:~ .;~!~ ~,~:'~
~U. ",.._,=
,.,.._, ,.",...-.. .;;;; ~.:.:::
TVPIéÃl LOT ~ LOT
"""":,~r-- ".,.,.
PRODUCT PlACEMENT PlAN
. AStMu.E II
HARVESTON
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 32104
ofTemecuJa
~ - ~~~:;~::' '
co.oum_..._... -.,..". -_..
-- GREYSTONE HOMES
.....~=......"
===
1
.. --1-
~...
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT NO, 2
PC RESOLUTION NO, 2005--
R,lProduct Reviewl2004\04-0365 Ashville ¡!\Fiual Staff Report.dot
.
.
.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2005--
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION
NO. PA04-0359 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TIM 32104) and
PA04-0365 (HOME PRODUCT REVIEW "ASHVILLE II") TO
SUBDIVIDE 5.23 ACRES INTO FIFTY-THREE (53) SINGLE-
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOTS, EIGHTEEN (18) OPEN SPACE
LOTS AND A ONE PRIVATE STREET LOT AND A APPROVING
THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND PLACEMENT OF FIFTY-
THREE (53) HOMES WITHIN A PORTION OF PLANNING
AREA 3 OF THE HARVESTON SPECIFIC PLAN,
WHEREAS, Greystone Homes tiled Planning Application No. PA04-0359 and PA04-
0365 (the "Application") in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan,
Development Code and Subdivision Ordinance;
WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in
the time and manner prescribed by State and local law;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application
on January 9, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City
sta1f and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition
to this matter;
WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration
of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder;
WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA
DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1, That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby
incorporated by reference.
Section 2. Tentative Tract Map Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving
the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 16.09.140 of the
Temecula Municipal Code.
. A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision
are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, Harveston Specific Plan and the City
of Temecula Municipal Code.
Tentative Tract No. 32104 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision.
Ordinance, the Development Code and the Municipal Code because the project has
been designed for single-family residential lots which is consistent with the land uses
specified for this Planning Area in the Harveston Specific Plan.
R:lProduct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville [!\Draft PC Reso.doc
B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract
entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965.
.
The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use
and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts.
C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development
proposed by the tentative map.
The project consists of a 72-lot Tentative Tract Map which includes 53 single-family
residences, 18 open-space lots and one private street lot on property designated for
Medium 2 residential use.
D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of
approval, will not likely cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
The design of the subdivision is consistent with the land use assumptions of the EIR
prepared for the Harveston Specific Plan.
E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
The project has been reviewed by the Fire and Building Departments and has been
conditioned to address their concerns. All aspects of grading and construction will be
inspected by City staff to ensure compliance with all state and local codes.
.
F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible.
The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of single-
family residences, the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building
Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements
for energy conservation.
G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision. .
All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Map. The
Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed
division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the
Tentative Tract Map.
H.
(Quimby).
The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements
The City's parkland dedication requirements are covered in the Development Agreement
approved with the Harveston Specific Plan and the map provides public access to the
lake park.
.
R:lProduct ReviewI2004104-0365 Ashville ¡!\Draft PC Reso.doc
.
.
.
Section 3. Development Plan Findinqs. That the Planning Commission, in approving
the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Section 17.05.010 of the
. Temecula Municipal Code.
A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and
with all applicable requirements of State law and other ordinances of the City.
The proposed single-family detached homes are permitted in the Medium 2 land use
designation contained in the Harveston Specific Plan. The project is also consistent with
the Medium land use designation contained in the General Plan. The site is properly
planned, designed and zoned, and as conditioned, is physically suitable for the type and
density of residential development proposed. The project, as conditioned, is also
consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local ordinances,
including the Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and fire and building codes.
B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of. the public
health, safety and general welfare.
The overall design of the detached single-family homes, including the site, buildings,
parking, circulation, and other associated site improvements, is consistent with and
intended to protect the health and safety of those living and working in and around the
site. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be
consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to
ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent
with the public health, safety and welfare.
Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project has been determined
to be consistent with the previously approved Harveston Specific Plan EIR and is exempt from
further Environmental Review (CEQA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative
Declarations).
Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves
the application (PA04-0359 and PA04-0365) a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 32104) and Home
Product Review for the architectural design and placement of fifty-three (53) detached single
family homes in a portion of Planning Area 3 of the Harveston Specific Plan for all of the
foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A attached
hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary
conditions that may be deemed necessary.
Section 5, PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula
Planning Commission this 5th day of January 2005.
John Telesio, Chairman
ATTEST:
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
[SEAL]
R:\Product ReviewI2004104.0365 Ashville lllDraft PC Reso.doc
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
CITY OF TEMECULA
)
) ss
)
I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that PC Resolution No. 2005"- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission
of the City of Ternecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 5th day of January, 2005, by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
ABSTAIN:.
Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary
R:lProduct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville Il\Draft PC Reso.doc
.
.
.
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
R:lProduct ReviewI2004104-0365 Ashville IJlDraft PC Rosa.doc
.
.
.
EXHIBIT A
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No,: PA04-0359
Project Description:
A Tentative Tract Map (TIM 32104) to subdivide 5.23
acres into 53 single family residential lots, 18 open
space lots and one private street lot, The subject
property is located at the northwest corner of Lake
House Road and Sarasota Lane within the Harveston
Specific Plan area
DIF Category:
Per Development Agreement
MSHCP Category:
Per Development Agreement
TUMF Fee:
Per Development Agreement
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Portions of 910-110-027 & 916-170-016
Approval Date:
January 9, 2005
Expiration Date:
January 9, 2008
')
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
1.
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination with a DeMinimus Finding for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration
required under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of
Regulations Section 15075. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicant/
developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above,
the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish
and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
2.
The tentative subdivision shall comply with' the State of California Subdivision Map Act
and to all the requirements of the Temecula Subdivisiòn Ordinance, unless modified by
the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the
State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 30 days prior to the
expiration date.
3.
The permittee/applicant shall indemnify, protect and hold harmless, the City and any
agency or instrumentality thereof, and/or any of its officers, employees, and agents from
R,lProduct RevièwI2004104-0365 Ashville IlIDraft Conditioos of Approva1.doc
1
4.
any and all claims, actions, or proceedings against the City, or any agency or
instrumentality thereof, or any of its officers, employees, and agents, to attack, set aside,
void, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting from an approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application
which action is brought within the appropriate statute of limitations period and Public
Resources Code, Division 13, Chapter 4 (Section 21000 et seq., including but not by the
way of limitations Section 21152 and 21,167). The City shall promptly notify the
permittee/applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding brought forth within this time
period. The City shall estimate the cost of the defense of the action and applicant shall
deposit said amount with the City. City may require additional deposits to cover
anticipated costs. City shall refund, without interest, any unused portions of the deposit
once the litigation is finally concluded. Should the City fail to either promptly notify or
cooperate fully, permittee/applicant shall not, thereafter be responsible to indemnify,
defend, protect, or hold harmless the City, any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any
of its officers, employees, or agents. Should the applicant fail to timely post the required
deposit, the Director may terminate the land use approval without further notice to the
applicant.
This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific
Plan No. 13, the Harveston Specific Plan.
5.
All development fees shall be paid in conformance with the Development Agreement
that regulates this development project.
The project and all subsequent projects within this.site shall comply with all mitigation
measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston
Specific'Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof.
6.
Further, notwithstanding any of the conditions contained herein, Developer may seek an
agreement for reimbursement for any improvements or facilities that qualify for
reimbursement at such time as the City of Temecula adopts an ordinance for such
reimbursement pursuant to and consistent with California Government Code Sections
66485 through 66489, inclusive, and further shall waive the same in' the event of
agreements, consistent with the foregoing, that require or include any or all of the terms
set forth immediately above.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
7.
8.
A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Division.
Prior to Recordation of the Final Map
9.
The following shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Division:
a. A copy of the Final Map.
b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes:
i. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar
Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the
California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations,
Ordinance No. 655.
R:\Prodnct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville [!\Draft Conditions of ApprovaJ.doc
2
.
.
.
.
.
c.
ii. The Harveston Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this
project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development
Department - Planning Division.
A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's).
i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The
CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open
space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all
buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways.
No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a
corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been
formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly
owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas
and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be
sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control,
and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the
development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's, which
shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling
units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance,
repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the
City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall
submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and. receive
approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not
apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes.
iii. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such
dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas
and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an
association owning the common areas and facilities.
ii.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
General Requirements
10.
11.
12.
13.
.
It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and
proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses,
and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and
revision.
A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the
Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the
City-maintained road right-of-way.
An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way.
All improvement plans, grading plans, landscape and irrigation plans shall be
coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements
contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula
my/ars.
R:\Prodnct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville I\\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc
3
14.
The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Harveston
Specific Plan No. 13 (PA99-0418) as approved on August 14, 2001.
.
The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract
Map No. 29639(PAOO-0295) as approved on August 14, 2001.
Prior to Approval of the Final Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall
complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement
agreements executed and securities posted:
15.
16.
17.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies: .
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
d. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau
e. Planning Department
f. Department of Public Works
g. Riverside County Health Department
h. Cable TV Franchise
i.
Community Services District
General Telephone
Southern California Edison Company
Southern California Gas Company
.
j.
k.
I.
Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the
design of the street improvement plans:
a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P.C.C. and 1.00%
minimum over A.C. paving.
Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard Nos. 207 and 207A.
Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in
àccordance with the Specific Plan Standards.
Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos.
400 and 401 or as modified in the Specific Plan.
All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees.
All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door
openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk.
Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and
adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility.
All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV
shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
.
h.
KlProduct Reviewl2004104-0365 Ashville ¡!\Draft Cooditious of Approval.doc
4
.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
. 24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
.
,29.
adequáte right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities
shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility
provider.
A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer
and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or
other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Logan Court on the Final Map with the
exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Sarasota Lane on the Final Map as
delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Lake House Road on the Final Map
with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map.
Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian
facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County
Standard No. 805.
All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the
public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or
abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved
by the Department of Public Works.
Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid.
An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the
Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the
map
The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an
Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the
subject property.
The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property
interests, and if he or she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of
the Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements
pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such
agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to
acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision.
Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount
given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The
appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal.
The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop.
Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements.
A 24 foot easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access
for all private streets and drives.
R:lProduct Review\2004104-0365 Ashville Il\Dnút Conditions of ApprovaLdoc
: 5
30.
31.
Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required' and shall be
delineated and noted on the final map.
.
Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage
facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land
division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for
review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage
facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage
easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating
"drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions. "
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
32.
33.
34.
35.
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board
b. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District
c. Planning Department
d. Department of Public Works
A Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City
of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to
commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control
measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion.
.
A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to
the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall
address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the
construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections.
36.
A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the
Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify
storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of
the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private,
drainage facilities intended to discharge 'this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an
adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or
private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of
all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the
storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for
analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years.
NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post-
construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction-
phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the
City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for
Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction
Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development
Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Projects will include
.
R:lProduct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville IlIDraft Conditiuns of ApprovaI.doc
6
.
.
.
37.
38.
39.
a combination of structural and non-structural on site source and treatment control BMPs
to prevent contaminants from commingling with storm water and treat all unfiltered
runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-
construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and
subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The
project proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term
maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs.
The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading
and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and
subject to approval by the Department of Public Works.
A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's
check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area
drainage plan fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already
been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid.
The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work
performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shall be in a format as
directed by the Department of Public Works.
All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales
independent of any other lot.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permits
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
Final Map shall be approved and recorded.
A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review
and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for
location and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils, Report
addressing compaction and site conditions.
Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code,
the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards
and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be .in
substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan.
The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as
required by, and in accordance with the Development Agreement between the City and
Developer dated August 28, 2001. .
Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy
As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive
written clearance from the following agencies:
a. Rancho California Water District
b. Eastern Municipal Water District
c. Department of Public Works
R'lProduct Review\2004104-0365 Ashville IlIDtaft Coudirions of ApprovaLdoc
7
All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public
agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works.
47. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City
, standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
46.
48.
The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken
due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and
replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works.
FIRE DEPARTMENT
49.
50.
51.
52.
53.
54.
Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full
force and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here.
Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed
by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the
California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which
are in force at the time of building plan submittal.
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land
division per CFC Appendix liLA, Table A-III-A-t. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet
from any point on the street or Fire Departl11ent access road(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903A.2, and Appendix
III-B)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land
division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this
project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating
pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the
approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire
protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as
given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix
III-A)
The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC
Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-21/2" outlets) shall be
located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be
spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet
R:lProduct Reviewl2004I04-0365 Ashville [!\Draft Conditions of ApprovaLdoc
8
.
.
.
.
55.
56.
57.
58.
59.
.
60.
61.
62.
63.
64.
.
from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant.
The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The
upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix
III-B)
Maximum cul-de-sac length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any
cul-de-sac shall be thirty-seven (37) feet for residential and forty-five (45) feet for
commercial. (CFC 902.2.2.3,CFC 902.2.2.4)
All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are
prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on
a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii.
Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed
travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible
provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. load requirements and are at road level.
Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on
each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular
road. .
If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection
prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal
roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access
must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a
separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field.
Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have
approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent
roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather
surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2)
Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved
Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or
any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be
an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of
.25 feet. (CFC sec 902)
Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than
twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than thirteen (13)
feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1)
Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred
and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of
accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4)
Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than
35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all-
weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1)
RolProduct Review\2004104-0365 Ashville ¡!\Draft Cooditions of ApprovaLdoc
9
65.
66.
Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective
Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3)
.
All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates
obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry
system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4)
Special Conditions
67.
68.
Prior to issuance of building perrpits, plans for structural protection from vegetation fires
shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval. The measures
shall include, but are not limited to, enclosing eaves, noncombustible barriers (cement or
block walls), and fuel modification zones. (CFC Appendix II-A)
Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a
georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map
including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a
ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83
(California Zone VI) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to
completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition.
COMMUNITY SERVICES
General Conditions
69.
70.
70.
71.
The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of
construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris.
.
The CC&R's shall address restricted street parking to accommodate solid waste
collection. Specific details shall include a means of notification to residents and visitors
as well as enforcement responsibilities.
TCSD shall review and approve the CC&R's prior to their recordation.
All private streets, parkways within the right of way along Lake House Road, Sarasota
Lane and Logan Court, residential streetlights on private streets, open space, pedestrian
access areas and monumentation shall be maintained by an established Home Owner's
Association.
Prior to issuance of Building Permits
72.
The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's
franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris.
Prior to issuance of building permit or the installation of additional street lighting to be
maintained by TCSD, which ever occurs first, the developer shall complete the TCSD
application process, submit the approved Edison streetlight improvement plans and pay
the appropriate energy fees related to the transfer of street lighting into the TCSD
maintenance program.
.
73.
R:lProduct Rcvicw\2004I04-0365 Ashvillc Il\Drnft Cooditions of ApptOvaI.doc
10
.
.
.
Prior to Certificate of Occupancy
74.
It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of
the TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers.
75.
The developer or his assignee shall submit, in a format as directed by TCSD staff, the
most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project.
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R,lProduct Review\2004I04'()365 Ashville ll\Drnft Couditious of ApprovaJ.doc
11
.
.
.
EXHIBIT B
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
HOME PRODUCT REVIEW
R:lProduct Review\2004104-0365 Ashville IIIDrnft PC Reso.doc
.
.
.
EXHIBIT B
CITY OF TEMECULA
DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Planning Application No,: PAO4-0365 Home Product Review
Project Description:
A Home Product Review "Ashville II" to consider the
architectural design and placement of 53 detached
single-family homes on 5.23 acres located at the
northwest corner of Lakehouse Road and Sarasota
Lane within a portion of Planning Area 3 within the
Harveston Specific Plan area.
DIF Category:
MSHCP Category:
Per Development Agreement
TUMF Fee:
Per Development Agreement
Per Development Agreement
Assessor's Parcel No.:
Portions of 910-110-027 & 916-170-016
Approval Date:
January 9,2005
Expiration Date:
January 9, 2007
PLANNING DIVISION
Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project
The applicant/developer shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or
money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-Four Dollars
($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of
Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and
California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period
the applicant/developer has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as
required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of
condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)).
General Requirements
1.
2.
The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree
to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's
own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings
against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly
or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any
agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body
including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning
Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any
agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers,
R:\Product Review\2004104-0365 Ashville l!\Draft Conditions of Approval.doc
12
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify
both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this
condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The
City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest
of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense.
.
All development fees shall be paid in conformance with the development agreement that
regulates this development project.
All conditions shall be complied with prior to any occupancy or use allowed by this
Product Review.
The permittee shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the
approval of this development plan.
This approval shall be used within two (2) years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall
become null and void. By use is meant the beginning of substantial construction
contemplated by this approval within the two (2) year period, which is thereafter diligently
pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this
approval.
This approval is for product review only arid shall in no way limit the City or other
regulatory or service agencies from applying additional requirements and/or conditions
consistent with applicable policies and standards upon the review of grading, building
and other necessary permits and approvals for the project.
.
The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved building
elevations, floor plans, landscape plans, hardscape plans, and plotting plan/elevation
enhancement plans contained on file with the Planning Department.
9.'
The construction plans shall indicate the following:
a. Prairie: Fine to light sand finish stucco.
b. ttalianate: 24-inch eaves; stucco soffits; and fine to light sand stucco finish.
c. Monterey: Barrel tile roof; brick veneer painted to match stucco.
d. All models with third story: Wrap around architectural treatment on all sides to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director.
10.
The colors and materials (including lighting) for this project shall substantially conform to
the approved colors and materials contained on file .with the Planning Department. Any
deviation from the approved colors and materials shall require approval of the Planning
Director.
11.
The Development Code requires double garages to maintain a minimum clear interior
dimension of 20' x 20'. This shall be clearly indicated on the plans prior to the issuance
of building permits for the project. Interior dimensions are measured from the inside of
garage wall to the opposite wall, steps, landing, equipment pedestals, bollards or any
similar type feature. When the top of the stem wall is more than 8" above the garage
floor, the required dimension is measured from the inside edge of the stem wall.
.
RlProduct ReviewI2004104-0365 Ashville [!\Draft Conditious of ApprovaI.doc
13
.
.
.
12.
Applicant shall obtain the proper permits before construction, including Encroachment
Permit from the Public Works Department for any work done in the City right-of-way, and
Building Permit from the Building and Safety Department.
Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable
satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being
maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner
to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The
continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the
developer or any successors in interest.
13.
14.
The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be
provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning
Department for their files.
The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department for permanent filing two (2) 8" X
10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved Color and Materials Board and of
the colored version of approved Exhibit "P', the colored architectural elevations to the
Community Development Department - Planning Division for their files. All labels on the
Color and Materials Board and Elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints.
Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits
15.
A copy of the Grading Plan shall be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department.
Prior to Issuance of Building Permit
16.
17.
Three (3) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and
approved by the Planning Department. These plans shall conform substantially with the
approved Conceptual Landscape Plan, or as amended by these conditions. The
location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The
plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance. The following items shall
accompany the plans:
a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fèe Schedule at time of
submittal).
One (1) copy of the approved grading plan.
Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water
Efficient Ordinance).
Total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with the approved
plan).
b.
c.
d.
18.
All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall
show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a 3' clear zone
around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the
screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not
to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all
light poles on plans and insure that there are no conflicts with trees.
R:lProdnct Review\2004104-0365 Ashville IlIDraft Conditions of Approval.doc
14
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted for approval with the landscape
construction plans, which details the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials
to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the
property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape
maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carryout the detailed program.
The applicant shall comply with standards, conditions and requirements set forth in the
Harveston Specific Plan, Mitigation Monitoring Program, Conditions of Approval of
PA04-0359 (TIM 32104) and the Development Agreement for the Harveston Specific
Plan.
.
Any optional exterior treatments such as garage doors, front doors, entry gates etc.,
shall be shown on the construction plans and be subject to Planning Department review
and approval.
The applicant shall submit a mailbox plot plan clearly indicating the location of each
mailbox structure throughout the project site subject to Postmaster and Planning Director
review and approval.
Prior to construction of the model home complex, the applicant shall apply for a Model
Home complex permit.
Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans, plotting plan,
and structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved by the Public
Works and Planning Departments.
.
The developer shall demonstrate to the Planning Director that aU homes will have double
paned windqws with at least a 25 STC rating installed to reduce noise from occasional
aircraft over flights.
The applicant shall conduct an acoustical study to ensure acceptable interior and
exterior noise standards pursuant to the General Plan noise levels for residential and
commercial structures. All recommended construction techniques, improvements and/or
walls recommended in the acoustical report shall be incorporated into the construction of
the structures and subdivision.
Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits
27.
All required landscape planting, irrigation and perimeter fencing/walls shall have been
installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition
acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds,
disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good
working order.
28.
Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to
guarantee the maintenance of the plantings, in accordance with the approved
construction landscape and irrigation plans shall be filed with the Planning Department
for one year from final certificate of occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and
irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of
Planning, the City shall release the bond upon request.
.
RlProduct Rev;ewI2004104-0365 AshvHle IJlDraft Conditions of ApprovaLdoc
15
.
.
.
29.
If deemed necessary by the Planning Director, the applicant shall provide additional
landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project.
Front yard and slope landscaping, hardscaping, fences and walls within individual lots
shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding
model home complex structures).
By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above
Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in
conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the
project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval.
30.
Applicant's Signature
Date
Applicant's Printed Name
R,lProduct Review\2004I04-0365 Ashville ¡!\Draft Conditiuns of ApprovaLdoc
16