Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout011105 CC Agenda In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title II] . AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL A REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 43200 BUSINESS PARK DRIVE JANUARY 11, 2005 - 7:00 P.M. / At approximately 9:45 P.M., the City Council will determine which of the remaining agenda items can be considered and acted upon prior to 10:00 P.M. and may continue all other items on which additional time is required until a future meeting. All meetings are scheduled to end at 10:00 P.M. 6:00 P.M. - Closed Session of the City Council pursuant to Government Code Sections: 1. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 with respect to labor negotiations. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and California Teamsters Local 911. City negotiators are Shawn Nelson, Jim O'Grady, and Grant Yates. 2. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 with respect to six matters of existing litigation involving the City. The following cases will be discussed: 1) City of Temecula v. KIR Temecula, L.P., a California Limited Partnership, et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401200; '2) City of Temecula v. EHG Associates, a California General Partnership, et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401208; 3) City of Temecula v. Taco Bell Corporation, a California Corporation, et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401211; 4) City of Temecula v. Sansom, et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401218; 5) City of Temecula v. Ellis-Faerber Medical Building, LLC, et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401224; and 6) City of Temecula v. D'Angelo, Trustee, etc., et al. - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. RIC 401227. 3. Conference with City Attorney and legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) with respect to one matter of existing litigation involving the City. The following cases will be discussed: 1. City of Temecula v. County of Riverside (RCIP litigation - Riverside County Superior Court Case No. 402766). Public Information concerning existing litigation between the City and various parties may be acquired by reviewing the public documents held by the City Clerk. R:\Agenda\011105 ~ Next in Order: Ordinance: No. 2005-01 Resolution: No. 2005-01 CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Jeff Comerchero Prelude Music: JoAnn Algier Invocation: Pastor Randy Ponder of Lamb of Life Flag Salute: Councilman Naggar ROLL CALL: Naggar, Roberts, Washington, Comerchero PRESENT ATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Report on the Spark of Love Toy Drive PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 30 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Council on items that appear within the Consent Calendar or ones that are not listed on the agenda. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you desire to speak to the Council on an item which is iisted on the Consent Calendar or a matter not listed on the agenda, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all Public Hearing or Council Business matters on the agenda, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to the Council addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time iimit for individual speakers. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten (10) minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless Members of the City Council request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. R:\Agenda\011105 2 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of November 23, 2004; 2.2 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004; 2.3 Approve the minutes of December 14, 2004. 3 Resolution approvina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2004. 5 Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for Fiscal Year 2005/06 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff; 5.2 Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to reprogram CDBG funds in accordance with the current budget resolution for general administration of the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Community Development Biock Grant Funds. 6 Parcel Map No. 31751 (located on the southeast side of County Center Drive - approximatelY 850 feet east of Ynez Road) RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 31751 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 6.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. R:\Agenda\011105 3 7 Parcel Map No. 31724 (located south of Overland Drive. east of Ynez Road. west of Maraarita Road. beina a subdivision of parcel no. 1 as shown by Tract Map No. 30107 RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 31724 in conformance with the conditions of approval; 7.2 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Certificate of Deposit for Monuments as security for the agreements. 8 Completion and Acceptance of Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2003/2004 - Proiect No. PW04-11 RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Accept the Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2003-2004 - Project No. PW04-11 as complete; 8.2 File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract; 8.3 Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven months after fiiing of the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. 9 Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Good Old Oavs Car Show 2005 Event in Old Town (Old Town Front Street. between Moreno Road and Second Street and other related streets) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM SECOND STREET TO MORENO DRIVE EAST FOR THE GOLD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW 2005 EVENT ON FEBRUARY 25, 26, AND 27, 2005 AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT 10 Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II - Proiect No. PWOO-09 - Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Solicitation of Construction Bids RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PWOO-09 - Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II. R:\Agenda\011105 4 '-.. 11 Amendment NO.2 to Professional Services Aareement with Vali Cooper & Associates. Inc. for Inspection Services for various CIP Proiects RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Approve Amendment NO.2 to the agreement with Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. to provide professional inspection serYices in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 12 State Route 79 Relinauishment RECOMMENDATION: 12.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FROM THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) TO PROCEED WITH THE PHYSICAL RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SR 79) AND DEFERMENT OF THE NEGOTIATED PAYMENT IDENTIFIED IN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-1258 TO A LATER DATE, AS DETERMINED BY THE AVAILABILITY OF STATE FUNDING 13 Temecula Lodaina. LLC - Median Reimbursement Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 13.1 Approve the Temecula Lodging, LLC, Median Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Temecula and Temecula Lodging, LLC, in the amount of $163,255.94 and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. 14 Renovation of the Swimmina Pool at Temecula Elementary School RECOMMENDATION: 14.1 Approve renovations to the Temecula Elementary School (TES) Swimming Pool in the amount of $142,500 as a FY 20004/05 Capital Project; 14.2 Approve the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $67,500 from the Dog Park to the TES Pool Project; 14.3 Approve the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $75,000 from the Skate Park Drainage Project to the TES Pool Project; 14.4 Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Temecula Elementary School Swimming Pool Improvement Project. R:\Agenda\011105 5 15 Emeraency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek RECOMMENDATION: 15.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RATIFYING EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES FOR THE RESTORATION OF PORTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY THEATER AND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM SITES CAUSED BY STORM WATER AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES FOR THE IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE DURING THE RAINY SEASON 15.2 Approve a contract with Road Builders, Inc. in the amount of $125,000 to provide the necessary emergency repairs and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract; 15.3 Appropriate $125,000 from the City's General Fund Designated Fund Balance for Flood Control. ******************** RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE CITY OF TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, AND, THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY *********** R:\Agenda\011105 6 , ,,"';,'" , ************;****~~**********************************************************~*~******i*********~********~~**.** TEMECULACOMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING ", ' . , ' ",' I",'!', " *****************************************************************************************~*********************** Next in Order: Ordinance: No. CSD 2005-01 Resolution: No. CSD 2005-01 CALL TO ORDER: President Chuck Washington ROLL CALL: DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Washington PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Board of Directors on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 14, 2004. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 7:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011105 7 ***************************************************************************************************************** TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING ***************************************************************************************************************** Next in Order: Ordinance: No. RDA 2005-01 Resolution: No. RDA 2005-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Ron Roberts ROLL CALL AGENCY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Naggar, Washington, Roberts PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Redevelopment Agency on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 14, 2004. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: Tuesday, January 25, 2005, City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011105 8 ************************************************************************************************************* TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ************************************************************************************************************* Next in Order: Ordinance: No. TPFA 2005-01 Resolution: No. TPFA 2005-01 CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Jeff Comerchero ROLL CALL: AGENCY MEMBERS: Naggar, Roberts, Washington, and Comerchero PUBLIC COMMENTS A total of 15 minutes is provided so members of the public may address the Temecula Public Financing Authority on items that are not listed on the agenda or on the Consent . Calendar. Speakers are limited to two (2) minutes each. If you decide to speak to the Board of Directors on an item not on the agenda or on the Consent Calendar, a pink "Request to Speak" form should be filled out and filed with the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name for the record. For all other agenda items, a "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk Prior to the Board of Directors addressing that item. There is a five (5) minute time limit for individual speakers. Anyone wishing to address the Board of Directors should present a completed pink "Request to Speak" form to the City Clerk. When you are called to speak, please come forward and state your name and address for the record. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004 RECONVENE THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT JOINT CITY COUNCIL. TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council, Temecula Public Financing Authority, and the Community Services District before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. R:\Agenda\011105 9 2 Formation of Temecula Public Financina Authority Community Facilities District No. 03- 02 (Roripauah Ranch) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 That the City Council hold a public hearing regarding the proposed bond financing by the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) of various public improvements; 2.2 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03- 02 2.3 That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT, AND APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR LONG VALLEY WASH RECREATIONAL TRAILS - RORIPAUGH RANCH 2.4 That the Temecula Community Services District adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. CSD NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - RORIPAUGH RANCH 2.5 That the Public Financing authority hold the continued public hearings regarding the formation of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch - the CFD), the levy of special taxes in the CFD, and the issuance of bonds by the Public Financing Authority for the CFD; R:\Agenda\011105 10 2.6 That the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 2.7 That the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT 2.8 That the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) 2.9 That the Public Financing Authority hold an election regarding the CFD; 2.10 That the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02 R:\Agenda\011105 11 2.11 That the Temecula Public Financing Authority introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. TPFA OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) ADJOURN THE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT AND RECESS THE CITY COUNCIL. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT BOARD MEMBERS' REPORTS ADJOURNMENT R:\Agenda\011105 12 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public Hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the Approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing. 16 Amendments to TUMF Ordinance RECOMMENDATION: 16.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, SECTION 4(A); SECTION 6(B), AND SECTION 11 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ALLOWING FOR FUTURE FEE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION (TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM) 17 Plannina Application for a Specific Plan Amendment to the Maraarita Villaae Specific Plan (SP-3 - PA04-0486) RECOMMENDATION: 17.1 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE EXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-3) ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46 TO ALLOW NO MINIMUM BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY LINES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 46 AS LONG AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS USED SOLELY FOR RECREATION, OPEN SPACE, OR PARKING PURPOSES (PA04-0486) 18 Roripauah Ranch Specific Plan Amendment - PA04-0370: General Plan Amendment- PA04-0371: Specific Plan Amendment - PA04-0369: Tentative Tract Map No. 32004: Amendment to Development Aareement - PA04-0590 RECOMMENDATION: 18.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\Agenda\011105 13 RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 7B IN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), AND CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E) - LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0370) 18.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF PLANNING AREA 7B FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW-ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E), MODIFY THE FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE BOUNDARY, ADD ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, AMEND THE DESCRIPTION SUMMARIES OF PLANNING AREAS 1 A, 7B, 10, 12, AND 27, REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND MAKE OTHER MINOR TEXT CHANGES TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0371) 18.3 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE A LOW- ESTATE ZONE, AND ADD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, GARAGES, AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO YARD AREAS (PA04-0371) R:\Agenda\011105 14 18.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0369 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32004) TO CREATE SIX ADDITIONAL LOTS AND MODIFY THE CONFIGURATION OF A TOTAL OF 18 LOTS IN PLANNING AREA 1A TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENSION OF A CUL-DE-SAC, LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0369) 18.5 Introduce and read by title only an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-05090) COUNCIL BUSINESS 19 Council Vacancy created by the election of Jeff Stone to Riverside County Board of Supervisors RECOMMENDATION: 19.1 Provide direction to staff regarding filling of Council vacancy. 20 Selection of City Council Committee Assianments RECOMMENDATION: 20.1 Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: Commission Liaison (One Member) Community Services Commission Old Town Local Review Board Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Planning Commission Public/Traffic Safety Commission R:\Agenda\011105 15 20.2 Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Advisory Committees: Advisorv Committees (Two Members) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee Economic Development/Oid Town Steering Committee Finance Committee Joint City Council/TVUSD Committee Library Task Force Old Town Temecula Community Theater Ad Hoc Committee/Theater Advisory Committee Public Works/Facilities Committee 20.3 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following external committees: Representative AssiQnments (External Organizations) Animal Friends Liaison/JPA Representative French Valley Airport Committee League of Calif. Congress - 2005 Voting Delegates Murrieta Creek Advisory Board National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2005 Voting Delegate Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (adYisory only) Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors Trails Master Plan Development Committee WRCOG/RCA Representative 20.4 Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Council Subcommittees: Council Subcommittees Cable Franchise Renewal Committee Campus Project Ad Hoc Council Subcommittee Children's Museum Ad Hoc Subcommittee Electrical Needs Ad Hoc Subcommittee Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Open Space Subcommittee Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee SAF-T NET Subcommittee Technology Ad Hoc Subcommittee Telecommunications Subcommittee Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee Temecula/Murrieta Subcommittee Veteran's War Memorial Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Committee Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) R:\Agenda\011105 16 20.5 Review the current members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee and appointment new members as appropriate: General Plan Community Advisorv Committee 1 Planning Commissioner - David Matthewson. 1 Public Traffic Safety Commissioner - Darrell Connerton 1 Community Services Commissioner - Jim Meyler 5 City Residents - Mark Broderick, Tony Harris, Paul Jacobs, Greg Morrison, John Telesio 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce - Janese Reyes 1 Representative of the EDC - Gary Youmans 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization - Bob Wheeler The 5 City ~esidents represent one appointment from each Council member. Darrell Connerton is no longer on the Traffic Commission so another representative for that commission will need to be appointed. 21 Disaster Relief Donation to the American Red Cross (Tsunami Victims) (Requested by Mayor Comerchero and Councilman Naggar) RECOMMENDATION: 21.1 Provide direction to staff regarding an appropriation and donation of $25,000 to the American Red Cross to assist with the disaster relief efforts underway in South Asia; 21.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONTINUED TSUNAMI DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT IN SOUTH ASIA 22 Draft Heritaae Tree Policy RECOMMENDATION: 22.1 Review the draft of the Heritage Tree Preservation and Protection Policy and appoint a subcommittee to finalize the policy. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT ADJOURNMENT Next regular meeting: City Councii, Tuesday, January 25, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. R:\Agenda\011105 17 ~ ITEM 1 , , ITEM 2 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 23, 2004 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and in Open Session at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, November 23, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: 5 Council members: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Naggar Absent: o Council members: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by Sienna Naggar accompanied by Helen Miller. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Reverend Lance Kerwin of Calvary Chapel of Temecula. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Councilman Stone. PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS Candleliaht Tribute Proclamation Ms. Mejia introduced Ms. Harkey, Ms. Strickland, and Chaplain Wimberly; accepted the proclamation; and invited the public to attend the Candlelight Tribute. Chaplain Wimberly as well welcomed the community to come together to take this opportunity to remember those that were loved and lost. Mayor Naggar thanked those involved for sharing their loss and, thereby, allowing the community to grieve together. Certificate of Appreciation for Darrell Connerton Thanking the City Council for this recognition, Mr. Connerton accepted the certificate and expressed his delight with having had the opportunity to serve the City. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Sharing a picture and fond comments made to him by visitors of the Veterans' Memorial, Mr. and Mrs. David and Barbara Micheal, Murrieta, publicly praised Community Services Director Parker for his dedicated effort, support, patience, and care and presented to the City a check in the amount of $23,000 from the Veterans of Foreign Wars for its share of the expenses for the Path of Honor - Veterans' Memorial. R:\Minutes\112304 Mrs. Micheal extended a special gratitude to the Community Services Department for their associated efforts. Mayor Naggar thanked Mr. Micheal for his dedicated efforts with the completion of this memorial. B. Commenting on the number of times this matter has been addressed at the City Council, Ms. K. Laura Upton, Temecula, expressed continued concern with the speeding problem on Calle Pina Colada and requested that the City Council address this issue and suggested the possibility of installing stop signs. C. Noting that Calle Pina Colada is being utilized as a collector road/arterial road, Ms. Jayme Christian, Temecula, requested that this matter be addressed by the City Council. D. Mr. Todd Johnson, Temecula, representing 3M Company, familiarized to the City Council with an effective traffic control device - driver feedback sign. Having invited Mr. Johnson to the City Council to share this device, Councilman Stone requested that a few extra minutes be granted to Mr. Johnson. Continuing with his presentation, Mr. Johnson described the driver feedback sign. Mr. Stone encouraged the City Council to grant Mr. Johnson the ability to meet with the Public Works Department in an effort to reduce speeds throughout the City. Mayor Naggar suggested that Mr. Johnson contact Public Works Director Hughes to explore the services of the 3M Company or any other company with similar services. For the public, Mr. Hughes briefly advised that the City is currently utilizing similar signs. E. Speaking on behalf of Mr. Howard Cunningham, Ms. Sue Heh, Wildomar, addressed the closure of the Workforce Development Center; encouraged the City Council to continue its efforts on behalf of the unemployed or underemployed; and suggested that the City obtain further assistance in reestablishing the Workforce Development Center. Mayor Naggar requested that information with regard to possible closure of the Workforce Development Center be forwarded to the City Council. City Manager Nelson noted that staff is in process of working on this matter. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Having lost a recent golf bet, Councilman Washington, as a result of this loss, confessed his loss on television. Having heard a number of complaints about the new Employee Benefit Program with Sprint, Mr. Washington requested that the matter be explored by staff. Commending City Manager Nelson, Community Services Director Parker, and City staff for the wonderful Veterans' ceremony, Mr. Washington expressed his feelings with regard to the outstanding memorial. Mr. Washington as well commended Mr. Micheal on his efforts associated with the memorial. R:\Minutes\112304 2 In light of the upcoming Candlelight Tribute on December 4, 2004, at the Promenade Mall, Mr. Washington expressed his and his family's deepest sympathy to Sheryl Brogden and her children on the loss of her husband and their father. B. Councilman Roberts commended Mr. Washington on publicly announcing that he had a bad golf game. Concurring with the comments made by the residents of Pina Colada, Councilman Roberts noted that the problem is that Pina Colada is a wide street and it has no stop signs for a long distance, viewing this street as a cut-through street and noting that the previously installed speed bumps did not resolve the problem; and that, therefore, these bumps were removed. Mr. Roberts requested that this matter be addressed by the Public Traffic Safety Commission. C. Having recently traveled to Nakayama, Japan, Councilman Roberts commented on the 10-year Sister City relationship celebration and shared City-to-City gifts. By way of a video, Mr. Roberts shared the unveiling ceremony, celebrating the 10th anniversary of our Sister City relationship in Nakayama. Mr. Roberts commended Community Services Director Community Services Director Parker, Maintenance Superintendent Harrington, and the Community Services Department staff for their diligent efforts in completing the Japanese Garden, with special recognition to Mr. Harrington on his design of the garden and the coordination of it. In closing, Mr. Roberts distributed commemorative anniversary gifts to each Councilmember. Echoing Councilman Roberts, City Manager Nelson as well commended Maintenance Superintendent Harrington on his efforts and as well recognized Mr. Vince Dedonado who volunteered his time to assist Mr. Harrington in the completion of the Japanese Garden. D. Thanking Councilman Roberts for bringing the Japanese Garden project to the Council's attention, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero encouraged the public to visit the Duck Pond. Expressing his appreciation of the Veterans' Memorial, Mr. Comerchero encouraged the public to view the memorial. Thanking those involved in the Children's Museum project, Mr. Comerchero advised that the museum has received an award from the Themed Entertainment Association - an international association. E. Congratulating Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and Mrs. Pat Comerchero on their vision of the Children's Museum, Councilman Stone commended the City on its receipt of this award. Mr. Stone commended Councilman Roberts for his vision of the Duck Pond property and extended kudos to Councilman Washington for his efforts with the construction of the City's theater. In response to Ms. Christian's concerns with regard to Pina Colada, Mr. Stone noted that he was under the impression that the cut-through problem was under control and appreciated her input and encouraged the public to communicate with the City Council members regarding any concerns. Having attended a California Association of County Governments seminar, Councilman Stone commented on this learning experience for incumbent supervisors and newly elected supervisors to better acquaint themselves with their new job responsibilities, noting that there are 257 supervisors in the State of California; that 50 of these 257 were newly elected R\Minutes\112304 3 supervisors, which was one of the highest percentage turnoyers of supervisors; that at the seminar, he had met Mr. Todd Johnson of 3M Company; and that he had as well communicated with a company that explores State and Federal grants for cities for various projects. And, lastly, having visited the Farmers' Market last weekend, Mr. Stone expressed his delight with the market and its operation and encouraged the expansion of the Farmers' Market. F. Mayor Naggar wished everyone a Happy Thanksgiving. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the minutes of October 26, 2004; 2.2 Approve the minutes of November 9, 2004. (Councilman Roberts abstained with regard to 2.2.) 3 Resolution approvina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-114 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 4 Acceptance of the northerly half-width of Deer Hollow Way into the City-maintained Street System within Tract Map No. 29305-1 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: R\Minutes\ 112304 4 RESOLUTION NO. 04-115 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACCEPTING THE NORTHERLY HALF-WIDTH OF DEER HOLLOW WAY INTO THE CITY-MAINTAINED STREET SYSTEM (WITHIN TRACT MAP NO. 29305-1) 5 Environmental Enhancement and Mitiaation Proaram (EEM) Grant Application for FY 2005-2006 RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Receive and file this report regarding our Enyironmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program (EEM) Grant Application for the development of the Temecula Park and Ride Landscape Enhancement Project and authorize the Director of Public Works to forward said application to the California Resources agency; 5.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-116 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS FOR THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENHANCEMENT AND MITIGATION PROGRAM UNDER SECTION 164.56 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE FOR THE TEMECULA PARK AND RIDE LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENT PROJECT 6 Revisions to the Schedule of Authorized Positions RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Approve the Schedule of Authorized Positions as amended. 7 Purchase of six City Vehicles RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Paradise Chevrolet: . One 2005 - Sedan Impala . One 2005 - SUV Trailblazer $17,457.78 $27,208.87 7.2 Approve the purchase of the following vehicles from Carriage Motor Company: . Two 2005 - 2WD GMC Sierra Pick-up Trucks $17,801.38 (each) $24,670.95 . One 2005 - 4WD % ton GMC Sierra Pick-up Truck R\Minutes\112304 5 . One 2005 - 1 ton Cargo Van $20,131.67 8 Appointment to Weed Abatement Appeals Board RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Appoint the Standing Chairs of the Public/Traffic Safety Commission and the Community Services Commission to the Weed Abatement Appeals Board. 9 Second Readina of Ordinance No. 04-14 (Temecula Creek Villaae) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04-14 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE TEMECULA CREEK VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) ZONING DOCUMENT TO PERMIT THE SALE OF ALCOHOL IN THE VILLAGE COMMERCIAL PLANNING AREA AND OTHER MINOR TEXT AMENDMENTS FOR CLARIFICATION MOTION: Councilman Washington moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 9. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Councilman Roberts who abstained with regard to Item No. 2.2. At 7:59 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Temecula Public Financing Authority. At 8:06 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. 10 Taraet Corporation - PA03-0726 - Minor Conditional Use Permit and Findinqs of Public Convenience and Necessity RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-117 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA UPHOLDING THE PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL FOR A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND FINDINGS OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY TO ALLOW THE SALES OF BEER AND WINE (TYPE 20 LICENSE) WITHIN AN EXISTING 101,909 SQUARE FOOT TARGET STORE LOCATED AT 19676 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. 921-320-053 R:\Minutes\112304 6 As an owner of property outside of the City but because he is negotiating an easement over his property to accommodate the expansion of a Target Store, City Attorney Thorson advised that Mayor Naggar will be abstaining from this matter. Planning Director Ubnoske provided the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that Alcohol Beverage Control (ABC) uses census tracts as its means of calculating, based on existing population, the allowable number of permits; that, in response to Councilman Washington, noted that the boundary map drawn by ABC has no correlation to City zoning; that, for Councilman Stone, advised that City staff used the same argument as far as convenience and necessity in denying a neighboring business the opportunity to sell spirits as was used for the Target Corporation; and that, for Councilman Roberts, Section 2 of the Findings was answered by the applicant. At this time, the public hearing was opened. Ms. Sharon Bishop, representing Target Corporation, provided an oyerview of Target Corporation's desire to sell premium wine in the Temecula Target Store; emphasized that Target shares the City's concerns with regard to the sale of alcohol; that, therefore, training and point-of-sale measures have been implemented to ensure the proper sale of wine; that currently 100 Target stores in California sell wine; and that Target Corporation has an interest in selling wine in order to expand its market. For Councilman Roberts, City Attorney Thorson confirmed that the Target Corporation is only requesting the sale of wine. At this time, the public hearing was closed. Although having no problem with Target Corporation selling wine, Councilman Stone stated that the City must be consistent in its approval/denial process for all businesses. Having, in the past, entertained an alcohol license for spirits, Mr. Stone advised that the City has denied such a license to a business owner who owns a couple of convenience stores. Mr. Stone reiterated the need for the City to be consistent with its decisions regarding this matter and, therefore, concurred with the Planning Commission to deny the Target Corporation the ability to sell wine. Not having been on the Council when that prior denial of an alcohol license was considered, as mention by Councilman Stone, Councilman Washington relayed his opposition to the arbitrary nature of the boundaries set by ABC and its basis on population; that the sale of wine at Target would be a public convenience; that the request would not be to consume wine on the premises; that living in wine country, this would be an opportunity to promote premium wines at Target; that although he concurred with Mr. Stone with respect to inconsistency on the decision-making process, Mr. Washington stated that the Target Corporation should not be penalized for this action and, therefore, spoke in support of establishing a consistent policy. Considering the number of Type 20 alcohol licenses (12) in the surrounding neighborhood and considering only five should have been approved, Councilman Roberts expressed his opposition to the sale of wine at Target. Having previously yoted against an upgrade to sell hard spirits for a neighboring business, Mr. Roberts reiterated his opposition. Making the general acknowledgement that the system by which the City approves and allocates liquor license should be addressed, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero noted that the City is in the process of overhauling that system; however, at this point, other businesses within the City have R:lMinutes\112304 7 had to adhere to this standard. Mr. Comerchero echoed the comments made with regard to consistency and to treat all business owners the same. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero, City Attorney Thorson advised that with regard to this matter, the City is operating under the City's Conditional Use Permit which may be amended and the State law which requires the City to address the findings of necessity and convenience in the census tract and that if the applicant were denied at this time, the applicant may reapply at a future date. In response to Councilman Washington, Councilman Stone commented on the City's reasoning for exceeding the allowable licenses, noting that these licenses were primarily for larger retailers (grocery stores and department stores); that he would prefer the findings for convenience and necessity be completely eliminated; and that the City must apply these decisions on a consistent basis whether for a larger retail business or a small business. If the request before the Council were denied, Deputy City Manager Thornhill suggested that it be denied without prejudice, giving the applicant the ability to reapply within a 12-month period in the event the City were to resolve this issue within the near future. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to deny the appeal without prejudice for a 12-month period and to uphold the Planning Commission's decision. The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts. The electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Naggar who abstained and Councilman Washington who voted in opposition. While staff will be addressing this issue, Councilman Stone suggested that there should be a distinction between the two different types of licenses. By denying this appeal without prejudice, City Attorney Thorson advised that the applicant will not have to wait one year to readdress this matter and that the applicant will not have to resubmit fees. 11 Rancho Temecula Town Center - PA02-0360 General Plan Amendment: PA02-0363 Specific Plan Amendment: PA02-0364 Development Plan: PA02-0365 Tentative Parcel Map: PA04-0540 Conditional Use Permit RECOMMENDATION: 11.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-118 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR THE RANCHO TEMECULA TOWN CENTER, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0360, 02-0363, 02-0364, 02-0365, AND 04-0540) , 11.2 Adopt a resolution entitled: R:\Minutes\ 112304 8 RESOLUTION NO. 04-119 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) ON 20.2 ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND GENERALLY KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001. THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02-0360) 11.3 Introduce and read by title only and ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 9, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD (PA02-0363) 11.4 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-120 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 30719 TO SUBDIVIDE 20.2 ACRES INTO 12 PARCELS, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD AND KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 (PA02- 0365) 11.5 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-121 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA02-0364 - A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL RETAIL SPACE, INCLUDING THREE MAJOR TENANTS, SEVEN PADS, AND A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100- 013 R:\Minutes\112304 9 11.6 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-122 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0S40 - A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWING A TOTAL OF FOUR DRIVE-THROUGH FACILITIES WITHIN A RELATED DEVELOPMENT PLAN (PA02-0364) CONSISTING OF APPROXIMATELY 162,860 SQUARE FEET OF RETAIL COMMERCIAL SPACE, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WINCHESTER ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD KNOWN AS ASSESSORS PARCEL NOS. 920-100-001 THROUGH 920-100-013 Planning Director Ubnoske reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), noting that there will be a right in and right out exit on Winchester Road. For Councilman Roberts, Public Works Director Hughes advised that a bus turnout has been proposed but that no deceleration/acceleration lane has been proposed or required. Mr. Roberts expressed concern with no deceleration/acceleration lane and requested that it be imposed as a condition. Concurring with the suggestion of a deceleration/acceleration lane, Councilman Stone suggested that some of the landscaped area on Winchester Road be utilized as a deceleration/acceleration lane. Public Works Director Hughes noted that based on the Council's comments, the matter could be reviewed in more detail during the design process of the construction drawings, advising that the additional landscaped area is part of the 25' transportation corridor. . While reviewing the possibility of a deceleration/acceleration lane, Councilman Washington requested that staff provide information as to the determination of when such a lane is necessary and when it's not. In response to Councilman Washington's comments regarding the architectural review of this project by the Planning Commission, Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the L.A. Fitness structure was a concern as to its different appearance from the rest of the center, requesting the incorporation of tower elements and that with regard to the Rite~Aid structure, concern was expressed with regard to its proximity to the street but that no concern was expressed with its appearance or the appearance of the rear elevation of all buildings. Councilman Roberts reiterated his reasoning for the need for a deceleration/acceleration lane. City Manager Nelson ensured the City Council that if it were the wish of the Council, a condition of approval could be imposed, requiring the installation of a deceleration/acceleration lane. For Mayor Naggar, Public Works Director Hughes advised that the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan does require the developer to provide extensive improvements at Nicolas and Winchester Roads; that the proposed project will be dedicating the additional right-of-way necessary for Roripaugh Ranch to make these improvements; that the proposed project as well has been conditioned to complete improvements at the intersection to mitigate the project's impacts on R\Minutes\112304 10 the intersection; and that it would be expected that the improvements from both projects (the proposed and Roripaugh Ranch) will be completed in unison. For Mayor Naggar, Planning Director Ubnoske noted that the land use to the south of the proposed project is a mini-storage facility and that the land use to the east of the proposed project is residential (County). At this time, the public hearing was opened. Requesting the City Council's support of the proposal, Mr. Matthew Fagan, representing Pacific Development Partners, Temecula, noted that the applicant has diligently worked with staff over several years and the Planning Commission, advising that the Commission unanimously approved the project; stated that the applicant is in support of the conditions of approval; that although L.A. Fitness expressed flexibility of incorporating its appearance into the center, L.A. Fitness has requested the retention of the rotunda feature; and that with regard to the deceleration/acceleration lane, the applicant would be open to exploring any option for the betterment of the project and the community. There being no additional requests to speak, the public hearing was closed. Viewing the proposed uses compatible with the community's needs, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero expressed his support of the project. With regard to the architectural design of the project, Mr. Comerchero was of the opinion that those discussions should be held at the Planning Commission level and that Council discussion should be confined to the issue of the General Plan Amendment and its associated issues. Mr. Comerchero expressed concurrence with the installation of a deceleration/acceleration lane. Reiterating his support of the deceleration/acceleration lane, Councilman Roberts voiced no concern with the proposed project. Viewing the proposed plan as one that will meet the needs of the community, Councilman Stone commented on the sales tax revenue for the City, future jobs, and the positive impacts on lessening traffic; supported the architectural details; and expressed his support of the project. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adopt Resolution Nos. 04-118 and 04-119 with the addition of a condition of approval, requiring the installation of a deceleration/acceleration lane. The motion was seconded by Councilman Roberts. (After additional Council discussion, this motion ultimately passed; see page 12.) Because appropriate and mitigating measures haye been implemented to address traffic concerns, Councilman Washington stated that he would not view this center as creating additional traffic; concurred with the installation of a deceleration/acceleration lane; and as well concurred with Mr. Comerchero's comments pertaining to architectural reyiew occurring at the Planning Commission level; and, therefore, spoke in support of this project. At this time, the previously made motion, by electronic vote, reflected unanimous approyal. At this time, City Attorney Thorson introduced Ordinance No. 04-15. MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to introduce Ordinance No. 04-15. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. R:\Minutes\112304 11 MOTION: Councilman Stone moved to adopt Resolution Nos. 04-120, 04-121, and 04-122 with the addition of a deceleration/acceleration lane. The motion was seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS No additional comments. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No additional comment. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that with respect to the first Closed Session Item (potential litigation - Domenigoni-Barton Specific Plan pending before the County of Riverside), the City Council's action was to direct the City Attorney to take the necessary actions to express the City's acceptance of the conditions of approval and the phasing plan for that project as currently proposed, noting the vote on that action was three in favor and two did not participate (Councilman Stone and Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero who has a potential conflict of interest, owning an interest in property next door). With regard to the second Closed Session Item (Educational Project), the Council gave direction to staff and stated that this item will be forwarded to the City Council forfinal action at a public hearing on December 7, 2004. ADJOURNMENT At 9:09 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday, December 7, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\112304 12 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 7, 2004 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and in Open Session at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 7, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: 5 Councilmembers: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Naggar Absent: o Councilmembers: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by eve Craig. Ms. Caylie Gregorio sang the National Anthem. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Pastor Ranch of Calvary Baptist Church of Temecula. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Councilman Washington. PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMATIONS Viewing Guidant Corporation as a community neighbor and appreciating the work Guidant Corporation has accomplished in the community, Mayor Naggar stated that the City of Temecula is a better place as a result of Guidant Corporation and, therefore, noted that Guidant would be honored in the following manner: Certificate of Appreciation to Ronald Dollens. President and CEO of Guidant Corporation Advising that Mr. Ronald Dollens has recently retired, Mayor Naggar presented a certificate of appreciation, in his absence, to Mr. Ken Carlisle, Senior Vice President of Guidant Corporation. By way of a video presentation, Mr. Dollens expressed his honor in receiving this certificate and provided an overview of the Guidant Corporation and City of Temecula relationship. Proclamation - December 14. 2004. Guidant Corporation Day At this time, Mayor Naggar presented to Mr. Ken Carlisle, Senior Vice President of the Guidant Corporation, a proclamation proclaiming December 14, 2004, Guidant Corporation Day. With appreciation, Mr. Carlisle accepted the proclamation and expressed his desire to continue the work relationship between Guidant and the City of Temecula. He briefly explained the products produced by Guidant. R:\Minutes\120704 2004 Spark of Love Toy Drive and Dent Event Update Commenting on the 2004 Spark of Love Toy Drive and the Fifth Annual Dent Event, Fire Safety Specialist Horton advised that the event was hosted by the Guidant Corporation and shared the many activities throughout the day and the many generous toy and cash donations. Mr. Horton thanked all the co-sponsors of the event and with great pleasure, announced that this year's event yielded 694 toys, 29 bikes with helmets, 6 bike pumps, and a grand total of $9,445. City's 15-year Anniversarv Slide Show With much appreciation, Mayor Naggar presented to Mrs. Eve Craig a poinsettia plant for her continued efforts associated with coordinating the prelude music all year long. At this time, a slide show presentation was shown reflecting the many City accomplishments over the past 15 years. PUBLIC COMMENTS A. Ms. Lanae Turley-Trejo, Temecula, invited the City Councilmembers and the public to the Second Annual Community Creche Festival on Friday and Saturday, December 10 and 11, 2004, at the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints on North General Kearney, from 5:00 to 8:00 P.M. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Having seen significant progress with the City's Sprint Employee Servicing Contract, Councilman Washington thanked Information Systems Director Thorson and Administrative Assistant Casey for their efforts associated with rectifying this matter. Commenting on the recent Youth in Government Program hosted by the City and held at City Hall, Mr. Washington thanked Danielle Clark from the Temecula Unified School District, City Clerk Jones, and City Manager Nelson for their efforts in putting together a meaningful program for the students. Having attended the Candlelight Tribute, Mr. Washington thanked Ms. Mejia, Ms. Harkey, and Ms. Strickland for their efforts with this very moving and touching event to recognize those we loved and lost. Mr. Washington thanked Captain Neuman for chaperoning him to the Spark of Love Toy Drive, commenting on an outstanding effort; thanked the Community Services Department on another outstanding Tree Lighting Ceremony at the Duck Pond; reminded the public of the Annual Holiday Parade on Friday, December 10, 2004, at 7:00 P.M.; and in closing, praised his wife for being selected as Employee of the Year at her workplace. B. Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero extended a special tribute to Fire Safety Specialist Horton for his efforts associated with the 2004 Spark of Love Toy Drive and commended all those involved with this very special event. Expressing emotions he felt during the 15-year City Anniversary slide show, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero addressed the accomplishments this City has achieved during such a short period of time. R:\Minutes\ 120704 2 C. Having attended a conference in Washington, D.C. which addressed the infrastructure issues in the United States, Councilman Stone noted that this City is not the only City with such dilemma; shared important statistics; forwarded the Fourth Annual Underground Infrastructure Advanced Technology Conference Manual to Public Works Director Public Works Director Hughes; and requested, at the next City Council meeting, the adoption of a resolution in support of legislation to improve infrastructure at the local, State, and Federal level. D. Thanking staff for their efforts associated with the completion of the 15-year Anniversary Slide Show, Councilman Roberts noted that it had brought back many memories and wished everyone a safe Holiday Season. E. Advising that staff has explored the possible closure of the Workforce Development Center, Mayor Naggar noted that this center will be downsizing and relocating but will not be closing. Since the December 14, 2004 City Council meeting will primarily be dedicated to recognizing Councilman Stone for his years of service to the City, Mayor Naggar welcomed those that wish to honor, celebrate, share fond memories, or express appreciation to Mr. Stone for his years of service. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Resolution approvina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-123 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A 3 City Treasurer's Report RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of October 31, 2004. R:\Minutes\ 120704 3 4 Financial Statements for the three months ended September 30. 2004 RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Receive and file the Financial Statements for the three months ended September 30, 2004. 5 Southwest Communities Joint Powers Authority Aareement for Animal Shelter RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve formation of the Southwest Communities Joint Powers Authority (JPA) agreement. 6 1-15/SR 79S Ultimate Interchanae (PR) - Desian Cooperative Aareement with the State of California Department of Transportation - PW04-08 RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-124 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DESIGN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT - NO. 08-1249 - BETWEEN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR THE DESIGN OF A MODIFICATION TO THE INTERCHANGE ON INTERSTATE 15 AT STATE ROUTE 79 SOUTH 7 Pechanaa Parkway Phase liB Storm Drain Improvements - Wolf Valley Creek Channel- Staae 2 - Proiect No. PW99-11CH -Increase Construction Continaencv RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Increase the project contingency and the City Manager's contract change order approval limit by $300,000 above the previously approved 10% contingency for the Pechanga Parkway Phase liB Storm Drain Improvement Project (Wolf Valley Creek Channel- Stage 2) - Project No. PW99-11CH. 8 Aareement for Consultinq Services between the City of Temecula and Nichols Melbura and Rossetto (NM&R) Architects and Enaineers RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Approve the contract with Nichols Melburg and Rossetto, Architects and Engineers for master planning consulting services in the amount of $161,550.00. 8.2 Approve a contract contingency of 10% for an amount of $16,155.00. R:\Minutes\120704 4 9 Second Readina of Ordinance No. 04-15 (Amendina Land Use Roripauah Specific Plan) RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 04-15 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR PLANNING AREA 9 OF THE RORIPAUGH ESTATES SPECIFIC PLAN FROM NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (NC) TO COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL (CC) AND INCORPORATE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR PLANNING AREA 9 (PA02-0363) MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 9. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. At 7:52 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District, the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, and the Temecula Public Financing Authority. At 8:15 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. COUNCIL BUSINESS 10 Appointment of Mayor and Mayor Pro Tem for Calendar Year 2005 RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to appoint the Mayor to preside, effective January 1, 2005, to the end of Calendar Year 2005; 10.2 Entertain motions from the City Councilmembers to appoint the Mayor Pro Tem, effective January 1, 2005, who will assume the duties of the Mayor in the Mayor's absence and hold this office until the end of Calendar Year 2005. MOTION: Mayor Naggar moved to appoint Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero as Mayor for calendar year 2005. The motion was seconded by Councilman Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero thanked his colleagues for the vote of confidence and expressed his desire for the coming year to be an equally productive year as was 2004. MOTION: Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero moved to appoint Councilman Roberts as Mayor Pro Tem for calendar year 2005. The motion was seconded by Councilman Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. Councilman Stone thanked Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero for his years of service to this community. To Councilman Roberts, Councilman Stone expressed his excitement with supporting him as Mayor Pro Tem for 2005 and as well commended Mayor Naggar on an R\Minutes\ 120704 5 outstanding job in representing the City. In closing, Mr. Stone as well commended Mr. Washington on his first year on the Council. Councilman Washington commended Mayor Naggar on a job well done as Mayor, commenting on his leadership skills and his ability to represent the City in a professional and outstanding manner. Viewing 2004 as one of the least stressful year on the Council, Councilman Roberts commended Mayor Naggar on his ability to handle many issues in a positive manner. Echoing the commendations for Mayor Naggar, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero noted that because the Councilmembers like each other and work well together, many goals are accomplished for the City. Mayor Naggar thanked his colleagues for the kind comments. He complimented the staff, the community, and the volunteers of this community on a wonderful City. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT In light of the previous comments, City Manager Nelson as well expressed his gratitude for the leadership provided by the City Council and the teamwork of this City Council, commenting on the positive message it sends to staff and to the community. Although being extremely proud of the accomplishments achieved in 2004 as well as those accomplished over the past 15 years, Mr. Nelson stated that even greater goals are planned for 2005. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there were no matters to report for Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT At 8:25 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday, December 14, 2004, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\ 120704 6 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL DECEMBER 14, 2004 The City Council convened in Closed Session at 6:00 P.M. and in Open Session at 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, December 14, 2004, in the City Council Chambers of Temecula City Hall, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Present: 5 Councilmembers: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Naggar Absent: o Councilmembers: None PRELUDE MUSIC The prelude music was provided by eve Craig. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mayor Naggar. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The pledge of allegiance was presented by Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero. PRESENT A TIONS/PROCLAMA TIONS Mayor Naggar noted that all Council, District, and Agency business would be considered out of order after which the presentation portion of the agenda will be considered which will be a tribute to Councilman Stone. Certificate of Appreciation to Executive Assistant Steffen On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Naggar commended Ms. Steffen on her professionalism, her dedication, and her abilities and presented her with a Certificate of Appreciation. A Historv in Stone At this time, a slide show was presented, reflecting the many accomplishments achieved by Councilman Stone. Mayor Naggar presented to Councilman Stone a Certificate of SpeCial Congressional Recognition from Congressman Issa. Expressing his delight with haYing the opportunity to honor Councilman Stone, Assemblyman Benoit congratulated Mr. Stone on his successful election to the Board of Supervisors and presented to him a Resolution from the California State Legislature. R\Minutes\121404 With great pleasure, on behalf of the Registrar of Voters, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero presented the framed Certificate of Election to Councilman Stone and read the Oath of Office that Mr. Stone has already taken. On behalf of Team PACE and City staff, Administrative Assistant Casey and Senior Management Analyst Adams thanked the City Councilmembers and Executive Staff for the support and encouragement provided to Team PACE; congratulated Councilman Stone on his newly elected position; wished him much success; and presented to Mr. Stone a clock in appreciation of his support. On behalf of the Southern California Association of Governments, Councilman Roberts recognized Councilman Stone for his leadership and dedication to the critical policy issues facing the City of Temecula and personal commitment to public service and presented to him a Certificate of Recognition. Mayor Naggar presented to Councilman Stone a City proclamation proclaiming December 14, 2004, as Jeff Stone Day, honoring him for his diligent service, active membership in many organizations, his many accomplishments, for his vision, and leadership. Having known Mr. Stone for over 20 years, Ms. Joan Sparkman, Murrieta, expressed how proud she is of his accomplishments and noted that his mother would, as well, be very proud of him. Sharing fond memories of Councilman Stone, Mr. Bill Harker, Temecula, expressed his and his late wife's support of him for Council and now his support of him as Supervisor. On behalf of the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, Ms. Alice SUllivan and Ms. Pamela Voight, Temecula, thanked Councilman Stone for his continued support not only of the Chamber but of the business community and presented an Award of Appreciation for the 12 years of dedicated service, devotion, and service to the City and wished him much success. On behalf of the Economic Development Corporation's Board of Directors and Members of the Economic Development Corporation, Mr. Dennis Frank, Temecula, expressed appreciation for the many achievements Councilman Stone has accomplished for the City and, personally, Mr. Frank expressed appreciation to Mr. Stone for his vision, leadership, and guidance. Representing the Rancho Community Church, Pastor Struikmans, Temecula, on behalf of the Pastors of this Valley, thanked Mr. Stone for his support, encouragement, and participation and wished him much success. Not having voted for Councilman Stone for every Council term, Mr. Chris Peterson, Temecula, expressed appreciation to Mr. Stone for his years of service and accomplishments and advised that he did vote for him as Supervisor. Having attended City Council meetings for almost 10 years, Mr. Elton Ward and his wife, Jeannie, County, relayed their delight with Mr. Stone's election as Supervisor and wished him much success. Mrs. Pat Birdsall, Temecula, expressed her pride in haYing had the opportunity to serve with Councilman Stone on the City Council and her appreciation of his accomplishments for this City. R:\Minutes\121404 2 " Congratulating Mr. Stone for his 12-years of service to this City, Mr. Jim Domenoe, Temecula's Police Chief, expressed his appreciation for Councilman Stone's strong support of law enforcement for this City, looking forward to working with him as Supervisor and for his continued support. Having served with Councilman Stone on the Council since 1992, Councilman Roberts commented on Mr. Stone's vision for the Promenade Mall property; noted that Mr. Stone will continue to represent the City; and relayed how proud he is of his accomplishments. Having served with Councilman Stone on the Council for only one year, Councilman Washington, as a former Murrieta City Council member, shared fond memories of his relationship with Mr. Stone; commented on the respect he has for Mr. Stone and his visionary approach as well as his sincerity and concern for citizens; and wished him much success. Commenting on Councilman Stone's fingerprint throughout the City, Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero advised that in 1993, Mr. Stone nominated him to serve as a Commissioner to the Community Services Commission; noted that in 1997, Mr. Stone and he co-chaired Measure C; commended Mr. Stone on his vision of the Promenade Mall property; and wished him much success. City Manager Nelson relayed fond memories of Mr. Stone particularly expressing great appreciation to Mr. Stone for his assistance/support to the Nelson Family in 1997 during this time of need when Mr. and Mrs. Nelson's daughter was involved in a car accident. Mr. Nelson expressed great enthusiasm with Mr. Stone serving in his new leadership position. On behalf of all City employees, Mr. Nelson thanked Mr. Stone for his strong support of staff and wished him much success. Sharing fond memories of Councilman Stone, Mayor Naggar viewed Councilman Stone as a mentor and commended Mr. Stone on his political ethics. On behalf of the City Council, Mayor Naggar presented to Councilman Stone an aerial photograph, signed by each Council member, of the City of Temecula. At this time, Mayor Naggar handed the floor to Councilman Stone. Thanking everyone for their kind comments, Councilman Stone thanked staff for its teachings over the past 12 years, paying special tribute to key individuals throughout this organization as well as many other individuals; extended appreciation to Assemblyman Benoit for attending this meeting; commended Councilman Roberts on his experience with public safety, his leadership, and his dedication to this City and, therefore, advised that Mr. Roberts will be a member of his staff, beginning January 3, 2005; wished he would have had more time on the Council with Councilman Washington, expressing how fortunate this City is to have Mr. Washington on the Council; appreciated Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero's support on the Veterans' Memorial; commended City Manager Nelson on his very strong work ethic and high-professional standards, stating that Mr. Nelson's priorities are in the right place; and although having disagreed over the year on certain issues, Mr. Stone commended Mayor Naggar on his maturity as a public official and congratulated Mr. Naggar on an outstanding year as Mayor. In closing, Mr. Stone recognized his family for their continued support, acknowledging his daughter, Britney - a freshman at the University of San Diego; his son, who is back East at George Washington University, studying law; his wife, Regina; his sister, Lori, and brother-in- R:\Minutes\1214Q4 3 . law, Dan; his son, Anthony; his other son, Vincent; and his nephews, Travis and Chase. Noting that anyone in the community can make a difference, Mr. Stone encouraged residents to get involved in their community. Mr. Stone promised that he will work hard as County Supervisor in an effort to improve the quality of life and to obtain what is deserved for Southwest Riverside County - roads, bridges, freeway improvements, and public safety. He advised that he would be accessible for input as well welcomed volunteers for his offices in Riyerside, Menifee, Hemet, and Idyllwild; thanked the citizens of Temecula for their confidence and for the opportunity to serve them; and promised to not let them down in the future. PUBLIC COMMENTS On behalf of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Valley Balloon and Wine Festival and Executive Director Carol Pope-Joy, Mr. Dennis Frank thanked the City Council for its continued support of the Festival and apprised the City Council of awards the Festival has recently received. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilman Washington congratulated the recipients of the Holiday Lights and Festive Sites Awards and thanked Deputy Director of Community Services Ruse, Senior Recreation Coordinator Gilliland, and Community Services Department staff on another outstanding Holiday Parade; encouraged everyone to be safe during the Holidays; and wished everyone a Happy Hanukah, Merry Christmas, and a Happy Holiday Season CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Standard Ordinance and Resolution Adoption Procedure RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Motion to waive the reading of the text of all ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda. 2 Resolution approvina List of Demands RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-126 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A R:\Minutes\121404 4 3 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004 RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Receive and file the Comprehensive Annual Financial Statements, Auditor's Report, and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004. 4 Professional Services Aareement for Bridae Inspection Services - Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services. Inc. - Ynez Road Bridae (widen) over Santa Gertrudis Creek- LD04-051 CO RECOMMENDATION: 4.1 Approve an agreement with Parsons Brinkerhoff Construction Services, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $48,577 for professional bridge inspection and construction engineering services for the Ynez Road Bridge (widen) over Santa Gertrudis Creek Road Undercrossing - Project No. LD04-051 CO - and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement; 4.2 Authorize the City Manager to approye amendments to the agreement not to exceed the 10% contingency amount of $4,857.00. 5 Bonds and Aareement for additional Storm Drain Improvements in Tract Map No. 29305-1 (located east of Pechanaa Parkway and south of Loma Linda Road in the Wolf Creek Development) RECOMMENDATION: 5.1 Approve and accept the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, Subdiyision Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds as security for additional storm drain improvements for Tract Map No. 29305-1; 5.2 Direct the City Clerk to record the Improvement Agreement and file the Faithful Performance and Labor and Materials Bonds. 6 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchanae Proiect (PW04-08) - Property Acauisition and TUMF Reimbursement Aareement RECOMMENDATION: 6.1 Appropriate $1,423,408 from Tribal Association of Sovereign Indian Nation (TASIN) funds and $4,000,000 from Transportation Uniform Mitigation FEE (TUMF) funds to the 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of right-of-way; 6.2 Approye an advance of $4,000,000 from Capital Reserves to the 1-15/SR 79 South Ultimate Interchange Project (PW04-08) for the acquisition of right-of-way. (Mayor Naggar and Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero abstained with regard to this item.) R:lMinutes\121404 5 7 Parcel Map No. 30798 (located north of HiQhway 79 South. east of Avenida De Missiones and the future Rancho Pueblo Road (known as Rancho Community Church) RECOMMENDATION: 7.1 Approve Parcel Map No. 30798 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval; 7.2 Approve the Subdivision Improvement Agreement; 7.3 Approve the Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Faithful Performance Bond, Labor and Materials Bond and Monument Bond as security for the agreements. 8 Acceptance of Grant Deed - Harveston Community Park RECOMMENDATION: 8.1 Authorize acceptance of the Grant Deed for Harveston Community Park, located in the Harveston development and direct staff to proceed with the necessary actions to cause the deed to be recorded. 9 Police Department Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) Proaram Grant Fundina RECOMMENDATION: 9.1 Increase estimated General Fund Grant Reyenue by $29,220; 9.2 Appropriate $29,220 from General Fund Grant Revenue to the Police Department. 10 Resolution in Support of Leqislation to Improve Infrastructure (At the request of Councilman Stone.) RECOMMENDATION: 10.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 04-127 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION TO IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE AT THE LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL LEVEL MOTION: Councilman Stone moyed to approye Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 10. The motion was seconded by Councilman Washington and electronic vote reflected approval with the exception of Mayor Naggar and Mayor Pro Tem Comerchero who abstained with regard to Consent Calendar Item NO.6. R:\Minutes\121404 6 At 7:09 P.M., the City Council convened as the Temecula Community Services District and the Temecula Redevelopment Agency. At 7:12 P.M., the City Council resumed with regular business. At this time, a special tribute was paid the outgoing Councilman Stone and incoming Supervisor Stone; see page 1 - Presentations/Proclamations. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT No additional comment. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT City Attorney Thorson advised that there was nothing to report under Closed Session. ADJOURNMENT At 8:28 P.M., the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to a regular meeting on Tuesday, January 11, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\Minutes\121404 7 ITEM 3 RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the Office of the City Clerk, have been audited by the City Manager, and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $4,706,529.20. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, this 11th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:/Resos 2005/Resos 05- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby do certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 05-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of T emecula on the 11 th day of January, 2005 by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:lResos 2005/Resos 05- 2 12109/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/16/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/22/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12129/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12109/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 12116/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 12129/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS $ 1,144,973.48 1,480,574.50 859,350.93 487,954.85 24,307.58 356,511.58 352,856.28 $ 4,706,529.20 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01111/05 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 192 193 194 195 210 280 300 310 320 330 340 001 165 190 192 193 194 280 300 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV.LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL 8 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.CIP INSURANCE FUND VEHICLES FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES GENERAL FUND RDA.lOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACilITIES PREPARED BY LEAH THOMAS, ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT TOTAL BY FUND: I GENIE ROBERTS, DIRECTOR OF FINANCE I SHAWN NELSON. CITY MANAGER S 1,724,868.15 49,090.08 314,315.63 42,242.37 72,083.32 10,975.30 920.00 1,259,718.63 27,433.55 276,415.43 44,743.87 116,004.73 7,323.97 26,718.73 $ 3,972,853.76 $ 503,694.23 10,776.75 133,776.74 229.89 10,819.39 1.646.57 6,148.77 1,462.07 44,636.30 6,605.05 13,879.68 733,675.44 $ 4,706,529.20 . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. I I I 12/09/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/16/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/22/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/29/04 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 12/09/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 12/16/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 12/29/04 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 01111/05 COUNCIL MEETING: DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: 001 165 190 192 193 194 195 210 280 300 310 320 330 340 GENERAL FUND RDA DEV-LOW/MOD SET ASIDE COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B TCSD SERVICE LEVEL C TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D TCSD SERVICE LEVEL R CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ. FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP INSURANCE FUND VEHICLES FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES 001 GENERAL FUND 165 RDA.LOW/MOD SET ASIDE 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL B 193 Teso SERVICE LEVEL C 194 TeSD SERVICE LEVEL 0 280 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY-CIP 300 INSURANCE FUND 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES TOTAL BY FUND: I GEN I SHAWN NELSON, CITY MANAGER s 1 ,144,973.48 1,480,574.50 859,350.93 487,954.85 24,307.58 356,511.58 352,856.28 $ 4,706,529.20 $ 1,724,868.15 49,090.08 314,315.63 42,242.37 72,083.32 10,975.30 920.00 1,259,718.63 27,433.55 276,415.43 44,743.87 116,004.73 7,323.97 26,718.73 $ 3,972,853.76 $ 503,694.23 10,776.75 133,776.74 229.89 10,819.39 1,646.57 6,148.77 1,462.07 44,636.30 6,605.05 13,879.68 733,675.44 $ 4,706,529.20 . HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. ,HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOLLOWING IS TRUE AND CORRECT. apChkLst Final Check List . Page: 1 12/0912004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 418 12/09/2004 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 2,500.71 2.500.71 419 12/09/2004 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Income Taxes Payment 478.98 478.98 96386 12/09/2004 004918 A W DIRECT INC Supplies for Paramedic squad 398.68 398.68 96387 '2/09/2004 008394 ALBERTSON, RENEE Refund: Fee chg for temp use permit 97.00 97.00 96388 12/09/2004 006915 ALLlE'S PARTY EQUIPMENT Equip rental: Veterans Memorial 4,208.18 Equip rental: Japanese Garden dedica 1,353.32 Equip rental: Old Twn Christmas 1 ,226.32 Equip rental: Old Twn Christmas 388.24 Equip rental: ESG Mystery weekend 358.24 Equip rental: Halloween carnival 265.43 Equip rental: Old Twn Christmas 247.66 8,047.39 96389 12/09/2004 005713 ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION Alzheimers booth sponsorship 500.00 500.00 96390 12/09/2004 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Oct-Nay DUI Screening 382.50 Credit: 435307 SIB billed to RVSD Co. -32.50 350.00 96391 12/09/2004 007280 AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONS CPRlAED cards for fire paramedics 150.00 150.00 96392 12/09/2004 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALL Refund: Fee chg for temp use permit 97.00 97.00 96393 12/09/2004 008386 ANIOL, KONRAD A Refund: Security Depst: CRC 12/10/0 165.00 165.00 96394 12/09/2004 000101 APPLE ONE INC. Temp help PPE 11/13 Wills 906.88 Temp help PPE 11/06 Wills 854.56 Temp help PPE 11/20 Wills 697.60 Temp help PPE 11/20 Kasparian 672.30 Temp Help Ppe 11/20 Buchanan 526.50 3,657.84 96395 12/09/2004 008393 ARNOLD. KRYSTA Refund: Cotillion. Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96396 '2/09/2004 008062 ARROW STAFF RESOURCES, I Temp help PPE 11/14 Grove/Heer 2.626.69 Temp help PPE 11/28 Grove/Heer 2,389.37 Temp help PPE 11/21 Grove/Heer 2,389.37 7,405.43 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96397 12/09/2004 001323 ARROWHEAD WATER INC Bottled wtr servs @ City Hall 348.04 Bottled wtr servs @ Mnte Fae 158.83 Bottled wtr servs @ CRG 92.20 Bottled wtr servs @ C.Museum 46.41 Bottled wtr servs @ City Hall 39.86 Bottled wtr servs @ T.Museum 26.16 Bottled wtr servs @ Skate Park 17.02 Bottled wtr servs @ Tee 11.47 Bottled wtr servs @ lES Pool 9.69 749.68 96398 12/09/2004 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CA Membership: Jeff Grove 84339291 45.00 45.00 96399 12/09/2004 008387 BAKER, GLEN Refund: Security Depst: TCC 11/12/04 150.00 150.00 96400 12/09/2004 002713 BALLOONS GALORE Veterans Memorial balloons decoratio 329.71 329.71 96401 12/09/2004 003137 BARKERS FOOD MACHINERY S Refrigerator repairs: CAG 168.00 168.00 96402 12/09/2004 008395 BARRELS UNLIMITED INC. Old Town used whole oak barrels 416.88 416.88 96403 12/09/2004 008295 BASSETT SULLIVAN. JOE ESG Mystery Weekend performance 100.00 100.00 96404 12/09/2004 002541 BECKER CONSTRUCTION SRV Heavy rains damage street repairs 11,910.00 Low Flow damaged gate repairs 2,820.00 14,730.00 96405 12/09/2004 003984 BENOIT, VINCENT H,'....... Santa Claus: Old Town Christmas 500.00 Deduction: DA# 16-28-86 -187.50 312.50 96406 12/09/2004 005712 BINKY PATROL FY 04105 Comm Sves Funding Award 1,500.00 1,500.00 96407 12/09/2004 006721 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE Office Supplies: Finance 83.81 Office Supplies: Finance 64.53 Office Supplies: Finance 55.95 Credit returned merchandise:Finance -6.83 197.46 96408 12/09/2004 004380 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FY 04105 Comm Svcs Funding Award 1,500.00 1,500.00 96409 12/09/2004 004380 BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA FY 04105 Comm Svcs Funding Award 1,500.00 . 1.500.00 96410 12/09/2004 006930 BROWN, TAMMY Refund:Cotillion.Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96411 12/09/2004 006908 C C & COMPANY INC D.T. Halloween entertainment 1.800.00 Mr & Mrs Claus Suit Rentals 879.19 . 2.679.19 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96412 12/09/2004 007629 C S LEGACY CONSTRUCTION I Sr 79 S. Sidewalk Improvements 553.50 553.50 96413 12/09/2004 000924 CALIF ASSOC OF PUBLIC Ann'l Conf:1/17-21/05:Vollmuth 400.00 400.00 96414 12/09/2004 001159 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICE Fingerprinting 10 svcs:Police Dept 32.00 32.00 96415 12/09/2004 000502 CALIF MUNI STATISTICS CAFR Debt statement as of 6/30/04 400.00 400.00 96416 12/09/2004 004228 CAMERON WELDING SUPPLY Helium tanks refill:TCSD 28.40 28.40 96417 12/09/2004 005714 CAMP DEL CORAZON FY 04/05 Comm Svcs Funding Award 4,000.00 4,000.00 96418 12/09/2004 008392 CARBY, LEIGH Refund: Cotillion- Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96419 12/09/2004 008069 CHIN, VIKKI Refund:Cotillion-Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96420 12/09/2004 008385 CINEMA ENTERTAINMENT ALL Refund: Fee chg for temp use permit 344.00 344.00 96421 12/09/2004 000447 COMTRONIX OF HEMET Motorcycle squad radios repairs 75.43 75.43 96422 12/09/2004 005216 DEGAETANO, MONTSERRAT Refund:Cotillion- Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96423 12/09/2004 004450 DENNIS A HIBBERTS PLUMBIN Repair toilet @ Fire Stn 84 377.50 Repair toilet @ Fire SIn 92 192.75 570.25 96424 12/09/2004 006150 DIALOGIC COMMUNICATIONS Emerg Notification Sys ann'] support 2,322.00 2,322.00 96425 12/09/2004 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable Restrooms: Veteran 314.65 Portable restrooms:Halloween Camiva 116.56 Portable restrooms:C.Museum 114.95 546.16 96426 12/09/2004 004222 DIAMONDBACK FIRE & RESCU Fire & rescue equip: Throttle Cable 15.47 15.47 96427 12/09/2004 003610 DOMENOE, JIM Reimb: Mgmt Analyst Flash Drive 79.99 79.99 , Page:3 apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 4 12/0912004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96428 12/0912004 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI Fuel for city vehicles: PW mnte 61353 793.31 Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD 61343 677.19 Fuel for city vehicles: Land D. 61345 607.13 Fuel for city vehicles: 8&8 61348 478.24 Fuel for city vehicles: Planning 61347 356.26 Fuel tor city vehicles: C1P 61351 224.21 Fuel for city vehicles: Trtfc 61953 204.02 Fuel for city vehicles: City Van 61349 84.45 Fuel for city vehicles: Land D. 61345 78.97 Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD 61343 45.83 Fuel for city vehicles: CIP 61863 39.05 Fuel for city vehicles: Police 61347 13.79 3,602.45 96429 '2/0912004 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS I New employee glass mugs 50.64 50.64 96430 12/0912004 006002 ELWELL, JENNIFER Refund:Cotillion-Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96431 12/0912004 002438 ENGEN CORPORATION Veteran's Memorial Geotech S 385.00 385.00 98432 12109/2004 005251 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE Repair PW backhoe 595.97 595.97 96433 1210912004 000478 FAST SiGNS Duck Pond closed for remodeling sig 250.92 250.92 96434 1210912004 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services 63.03 63.03 96435 1210912004 008064 FELDEN. DAHRIS Refund:Coti11ion-Sock Hop 12.00 12.00 96436 1210912004 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Lot Book Report: Okabayashi 75.00 75.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 12109/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96437 12/09/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARO CENTER 008397 BENJAMIN MEDIA INC. JS Reg:Udrgrnd Infrastructure Cl:.l2/ 495.00 007115 LIGHTHOUSE LODGE. LLC AE htl:CALBO Ann'l Mtg:l0/28-3O 490.23 003478 CLOUD 9 LIMOUSINE SERVICE GY Airpt Transp:Sister City-LAX 258.00 005531 BAILY WINE COUNTRY CAFE DU Rfrshmnts:Dept structure mtg 246.14 008027 ISLANDS TEMECULA GY Refreshments: Gift giving cammill 204.47 001060 HYATT RR HtI: SCAG Mtg:l1/11-12 176.05 008272 JOHNNY CARINO'S GY Refreshments:Team Pace Mtg 172.79 001060 HYATT RR Htl: SCAG lorecast:11/17-18104 164.76 004808 DINE IN DELIVERY GY Refreshments:City Business 153.91 000871 HILTON AE Htl:Access Tmg:1119-10104 142.55 007148 MARIE CALLENDER HP Refrshmnts:Theater Interviews 131.72 007023 HUNGRY HUNTER GY Refreshments:lnterview Panel Fire 90,09 007747 MIMI'S CAFE HP Refrshmnts: Sister Cities Mtg 64.85 000152 CALIF PARKS & RECREATION S HP CPRS Label rental 55.00 000170 FRANKLIN OUEST COMPANY I AE Day timer supplies - B&S 50.52 004432 ALBERTSONS GROCERY STOR GY Refreshments:Public Safety Expo 44.71 004980 RITZ CAMERA GY film processing: 15yr slide show 32.33 000854 URBAN LAND INSTITUTE GT Reg:ULI Dist. Mtg:11111104 30.00 008396 TAPEANDMEDIA.COM GY 3 pack Sony Compac Disc 25.61 007065 B & H PHOTO VIDEO INC GY computer disk for Citizen Corp 23.65 008398 ST REGIS MONARCH BEACH GR Parking:Econ & Strategy Sem:1111 10.00 RR bank charges 1.75 3,064.13 96438 12/09/2004 007576 FITZPATRICK, KELLY Refund:Cotillion-Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96439 12/09/2004 005270 FLAGS UNLIMITED INC US Flags for Japanese Garden Dedica . 222.50 222.50 96440 12/09/2004 008391 FOSTER. JUDI Refund:2 Tennis- Beg.llnter. Jr. 31.67 31.67 96441 12109/2004 000170 FRANKLIN QUEST COMPANY I Day timer supplies. Finance 99.04 99.04 PageS apChkLst 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 6 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Check # Date. Vendor 96442 12/09/2004' 008390 GERKE, JON . Refund: CotHlion- Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96443 12/09/2004 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office supplies: Police Dept 23.32 23.32 96444 12/09/2004 005947 GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT Express Mail Service: Fire Prevo 45.09 45.09 96445 12/09/2004 008245 GROVE. JEFF Reimb: Employee uniform purchase 157.32 157.32 96446 12/09/2004 005056 GUTIERREZ. BETH refrshmnts:lnterview panel/EE luncheo 190 .Q1 190.01 96447 12109/2004 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies: TCSD Hardware supplies: PW 8t mnte Hardware supplies:TCSD Hardware supplies: CRG Hardware supplies: Fire Prevo Hardware supplies: TCSD Hardware supplies: Tee Hardware supplies: Sr. Center 1,044.95 472.21 288.51 222.11 . 147.54 141.71 37.10 14.03 2,368.16 96448 12109/2004 004525 HUMANSCALE CORPORATION Ergonomic supplies: Info Sys Ergonomic supplies: Info Sys 1,103.19 635.95 1,739.14 96449 12/09/2004 004624 INFOPLACE USA Spark of Love Drive gih cards 1.000.00 1.000.00 96450 12/09/2004 002166 INGRAM ELECTRIC Troubleshoot Duck Pond lights 690.00 690.00 96451 12109/2004 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizing chemicals 76.29 76.29 96452 12/09/2004 007654 INTERACTIVE DESIGN ArChitectural study: Old Town 2.068.00 2.068.00 96453 12/09/2004 004795 J B E S Telephone Input Module:Pala Prk 685.00 685.00 96454 12/09/2004 008241 JOHN WEBER CONSTRUCTION Rei Retention: Japanese Garden 12.628.00 12,628.00 96455 12/09/2004 008389 JOHNSON, AMIE Refund: Cotillion- Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96456 12109/2004 000820 K R W & ASSOCIATES Sept-Nay Plan check svcs Tract No. 30264.8 calc wrong 7,560.00 210.00 7,770.00 96457 12/09/2004 005271 KARMA, VIVIAN Refund:2 Cotillion-Sock Hop 12.00 12.00 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96458 i 2/09/2004 001282 KNORR SYSTEMS INC Pool equip: 318N white tube 188.38 188.38 96459 12/09/2004 004024 KOCH HEATING & AIR CONDIT Resid impr prgm: Garcia, Albert 3,480.00 Sr Resid impr prgm: Bowman, D. 1,171.00 4,651.00 96460 12/09/2004 000209 L & M FERTILIZER INC PW Small Tools/Stn 73 Chains 893.77 893.77 96461 12/09/2004 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERVICE LJ 8550 Printer troubleshooting 125.00 125.00 96462 12/09/2004 006744 LAMAR CORPORATION, THE Billboard chg outs:Old Town 455.00 455.00 96463 12/09/2004 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC Supplies For Paramedic Squad 1,456.22 Supplies for Paramedic squad 584.95 Fire medical s~pplies: Hmld security 424.23 2,465.40 96464 12/09/2004 008388 LINDSAY, COURTNEY Refund: Cotillion- Sock Hop 12.00 12.00 96465 12/09/2004 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS misc. signslhardware: PW Maint 745.09 745.09 96466 12/09/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC City Hall custodial supplies 446.89 CRC custodial supplies 351.94 Old Town custodial supplies 288.79 Parks custodial supplies 253.69 1.341.31 96467 12/09/2004 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER temp help wle 11/21 Hoof/Dankworth 1,162.40 temp helpw/e 11/14 Hoof/Dankworth 929.92 2.092.32 96468 12/09/2004 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Nov Sports Prgm Officiating Svcs 2,030.00 2,030.00 96469 12/09/2004 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC CAFR document covers: Finance 758.56 CAFR tab dividers: Finance 410.53 1.169.09 96470 12/09/2004 008067 MAWBERRY, YVONNE Refund:Cotillion - Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96471 12/09/2004 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC Traf. Poles/Mast Arms:Pech. P 1.204.56 1 ,204.56 96472 12/09/2004 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS reimb expenses: Dickens holiday 685.83 685.83 96473 12/09/2004 007669 MILES, KATRINA TCSD Instructor Earnings 126.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 42.00 TCSD Instructor Earnings 42.00 210.00 Page:7 apChkLst 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank; union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total Check # Date Vendor 96474 12/09/2004 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS windowenvelopes:Finance business cards: AlberVKurlowicz business cards: HanhardVDekker 875.29 85.66 85.66 1.046.61 96475 12/09/2004 004534 MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES Dec EOC stn satellite phone svcs 70.82 70.82 96476 12/09/2004 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING Remove silVdebrls: Vallejo Channel Install Temp Fence:Nw Sport Service Level "R" area's grading svc 5,800.00 4,900.00 920.00 11.620.00 96477 12/09/2004 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY Res Impr Prgm: Ristau, Fred & Leoni 448.00 448.00 96478 12/09/2004 007860 MT SAN JACINTO COMMUNITY O.T. holiday pertormance 12/04/04 300.00 300.00 96479 12/09/2004 001986 MUZAK -SOUTHERN CALlFORN Dec Music Broadcast:Old Tow 64.86 64.86 96480 12/09/2004 006077 NTH GENERATION COMPUTIN engineering time for SAN support 405.00 405.00 96481 12/09/2004 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Nav internet ad for H.R. Dept. 50.00 50.00 96482 12/09/2004 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS mise office supplies: P.D. O.T. Stn 371.50 371.50 96483 12/09/2004 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Mainl Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVGS City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs City Vehicle Repair/Maint SVGS City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 306.35 246.03 217.23 198.90 156.09 123.12 106.92 46.34 26.19 1,427.17 96484 12/09/2004 005819 ORANGE CO DA FAMILY SUPP supportpmt: 16-28-86 187.50 187.50 96485 12/09/2004 001171 ORIENTAL TRADING COMPANY TCSD special events supplies TCSD special events supplies TCSD special events supplies 406.34 281.20 123.85 811.39 96486 12/09/2004 008376 ORTIZ, MARIA Refund: Sec. Deposit: TCG 100.00 100.00 96487 12/09/2004 008378 P & R PRODUCTIONS Refund:!ee change for temp use perm 344.00 344.00 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 .12/09/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96488 12/09/2004 005161 PAGEL. TERESA Refund:Cotillion - Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96489 12/09/2004 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN High Hopes prgm supplies 122.31 122.31 96490 12/09/2004 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 536.12 536.12 96491 12/09/2004 000249 PETTY CASH ee's of the year raeogn. awards 500.00 500.00 96492 12/09/2004 008068 PLANTIER. WENDI Refund:Cotillion - Sock Hop 6.00 6.00 96493 12/09/2004 005362 PONTARELLI, ANTHONY A. performance:ESG Mystery weekend 100.00 100.00 96494 12/09/2004 002185 POSTM!'.STER - TEMECULA postage for business license renewals 2,858.60 2.858.60 96495 12/09/2004 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA annual p.o. box fee: Police 410.00 410.00 96496 12/09/2004 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTAN 8/9-9/5/04 Dsgn Svc:79s Medians 28,030.00 9/6-10/10/04 Dsgn Svc:79s Median 6,590.00 34,620.00 96497 12/09/2004 004529 QUAID TEMECULA HARLEY-DA Police motorcycles repair/maint svcs 3,092.89 3.092.89 96498 12/09/2004 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY maint parts for PW back hoe 61.15 maint parts for PW back hoe 44.18 105.33 96499 12/09/2004 000981 R H F INC Police radar equip. repair/maint 64.68 64.68 96500 12/09/2004 002612 RADIO SHACK INC misc. supplies for 1.8. Dept 54.48 54.48 96501 12/09/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 2.694.87 Various Water Meters 581.82 Various Water Meters 67.13 3.343.82 96502 12/09/2004 008381 RANCHO CHRISTMAS TREES Refund: temporary use permit 300.00 300.00 96503 12/09/2004 006738 RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURC Refund:fee change for temp use perm 97.00 97.00 96504 12/09/2004 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS Dupl Blueprints:Pech. Soundwall 28.84 28.84 96505 12/09/2004 004584 REGENCY LIGHTiNG various parks electrical supplies 230.93 C. Museum electrical supplies 57.67 288.60 Page:9 apChkLst 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96506 12/09/2004 000526 REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF General/Community Plans:l/6-3124/05 395.00 395.00 96507 12/09/2004 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE weed spraying:City owed properties 7,775.00 7.775.00 96508 12/09/2004 004498 REPUBLIC ELECTRIC Oct On-Call Traffic Signal Maint Svc 2,217.81 2,217.81 96509 12/09/2004 000267 RIVERSIDE CO FIRE trench rescue training:2/23-24/05 100.00 100.00 96510 12/09/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP 9/16-10/13104:lawenforcement 832,194.50 832,194.50 96511 12/09/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP Oct 04 booking fees 11,150.40 11,150.40 96512 12/09/2004 003587 RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC Repair broken window:City Hall 1,200.00 1,200.00 96513 12/09/2004 006555 S B C PACIFIC BELL annual maint on Cisco Routers 2,400.71 2,400.71 96514 12/09/2004 004598 S T K ARCHITECTURE INC Oct dsgn svc: Wolf Crk Fire Stn Oct Dsgn Sves: Wolf Crk Fire S 8,973.57 405.00 9,378.57 96515 12/09/2004 005018 SACHER. SUZANNE L. TCSD Instructor Earnings 96.00 96.00 96516 12/09/2004 008384 SAFF2NAY INC Spark/Love toy drive gift cards 1,000.00 1,000.00 96517 12/09/2004 004562 SCHIRMER ENGINEERING COR Oct plan check srvcs:Fire prev 6,500.00 6,500.00 96518 12/09/2004 008327 SEAWEST STUDIOS INC partial pmVconstruct 2 gates: C.Museu 5,000.00 5,000.00 96519 12/09/2004 008377 SHARED SERVICE CENTER Refund: fee change for temp use perm 344.00 344.00 96520 12/09/2004 004814 SIMON WONG ENGINEERING 1 Oct Dsgn Svcs: Main Street B 5,129.00 5.129.00 96521 12/09/2004 000645 SMART & FINAL INC ee recognition supplies High Hopes prgm supplies TCSD special events supplies 209.92 155.52 60.35 425.79 Page:l0 apChkLst 12109/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 1:10:32PM Page: 11 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Check Total 96522 12/09/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Nov 2-00-397-5042 City Hall Nov 2-02-502-8077 Maint Fac Oct 2-19-683-3263 various mtrs Nav 2-00-397-5067 various mtrs Dee 2-10-331-2153 TCC Nov 2-22-575-0876 O.T. Front St. Nov 2-18-528-9980 Santiago Rd 96523 12/09/2004 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Nov091-085-1632-0T.E.S. Pool 96524 12/09/2004 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETI annual mbrshp dues: McCarthy 1788 annual mbrshp dues: Willcox 1792 annual mbrshp dues: ,Parker 635 96525 12/09/2004 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST pest control svcs: City Hall pest control sves: T. Museum pest control Bves: Maint Fac pest control Bves: C. Museum pest control Bves: Tee pest control Bves: Wedding ChpJ pest control Bves: MPSC 96526 12/0912004 007851 SOUTHCOAST HEATING & AIR HVAC Repairs: CRC HY AC repairs: CRC 96527 12/09/2004 000293 STADIUM PIZZA refreshments: O.T. wreath decorating 96528 12/09/2004 004420 STATE COMP INSURANCE FUN November 04 Workers' Comp Premi 96529 12/09/2004 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCES StOlTIl water permitW.C.Sprts Cmplx 96530 12/09/2004 003000 STATE WATER RESOURCES Storm water permit: Library prjt 96531 12109/2004 006145 STENO SOLUTIONS TRANSCRI Novtranscription svcs: Police 96532 12/09/2004 004247 STERICYCLE INC Paramedic med waste disposal Bve 96533 12/09/2004 000465 STRADLEY. MARY KATHLEEN TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 96534 12109/2004 004221 SUSAN G KOMEN INLAND VAL Refund:fee change for temp use perm 96535 12109/2004 000305 TARGET STORE Spark/Love toy drive gift cards Amount Paid 5.544.20 1,467.46 1,131.61 955.73 596.84 272.76 48.82 14.30 50.00 50.00 50.00 56.00 42.00 40.00 36.00 36.00 32.00 29.00 140.00 70.00 65.94 48,098.23 521.00 356.00 1,601.12 94.60 580.00 288.00 344.00 1,000.00 10,017.42 14.30 150.00 271.00 210.00 65.94 48.098.23 521.00 356.00 1.601.12 94.60 868.00 344.00 1,000.00 Page:11 apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 12 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96536 12/09/2004 000305 TARGET STORE TCSD special events supplies 119.20 TCSD special events supplies 89.91 TCSD special events supplies 54.90 MPSC recreation supplies 44.94 308.95 96537 12/09/2004 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR Paramedic vehicle repair/maint Bves 1.323.60 1,323.60 96538 12/09/2004 006914 TEMECULA COPIERS INC. Copier supplies for Copy elr 42.02 42.02 96539 12/09/2004 005412 TEMECULA GARDEN & POWER small equip repair/maint: PW Maint 28.00 28.00 96540 12/09/2004 000515 TEMECULA V ALLEY CHAMBER Refund:fee change for temp use perm 1 ,528.00 1,528.00 96541 12/09/2004 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & SU various parks irrigation supplies 526.91' 526.91 96542 12/09/2004 003067 TEMECULA V ALLEY R V SERV Police Command elr repair/maint 366.87 366.87 96543 12/09/2004 000977 TEMECULA V ALLEY SPECIAL Community Service Funding Award 2,000.00 2,000.00 96544 12/09/2004 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED S Oct City vehicle fuel usage 55.45 55.45 96545 12/09/2004 008379 THEATER FOUNDATION. THE Refund:fee change for temp use perm 344.00 344.00 96546 12/09/2004 003031 TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICE I barricades for various parks 424.54 traffic control supplies: PW Maint 45.26 469.80 96547 12/09/2004 002702 US POSTAL SERVICE Postage meter deposit 2,825.25 2,825.25 96548 12/09/2004 004504 V AIL RANCH SELF STORAGE doc. removal from storage:Rcrds Mgrn 145.75 145.75 96549 12/09/2004 006398 VALUE MANAGEMENT STRATE Nov Consultant Svcs:F.V.Pk 947.41 947.41 96550 12/09/2004 004261 VERIZON Nav xxx-9897 general usage 90.10 90.10 96551 12/09/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internet svcs: xx0544 72.35 72.35 96552 12/09/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internetsvcs: xx7411 72.35 72.35 Page:12 apChkLsl 12/09/2004 1:10:32PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 13 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Description Amount Paid Cheek Tolal 12.00 12.00 912.28 912.28 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,610.00 1.610.00 65.00 65.00 6.00 6.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 194.40 194.40 Cheek # Dale Vendor 96553 12/09/2004 008380 VOLM. LISA Refund:Cotillion - Sock Hop 96554 12/09/2004 001890 VORTEX DOORS garage doorrepair/maint: Fire Stn B4 96555 12/09/2004 007987 WALMART Spark/Love toy drive gift cards 96556 12/09/2004 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC Oct Citywide tree trimming svcs 96557 12/09/2004 008382 WILLIAM HODGSON FML Y LMT Refund: dupl NSF payment 96558 12/09/2004 008070 WILLIAMS. LORENA Refund:Colillion - Sock Hop 96559 12/09/2004 004829 WILSON GROUP LLC, THE Dee State lobbyist svos for City issues 96560 12/09/2004 000348 ZIGLER. GAIL ReimbursementTree Lighting 12/6 Grand lotallor UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 1,144,973.48 Page:13 apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 1 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 420 12/16/2004 000444 INSTATAX (EOD) State Disability Ins Payment 17,030.26 17,030.26 421 12/16/2004 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 64,922.66 64.922.66 422 12/16/2004 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT SO Nationwide Retirement Payment 19.092.15 19,092.15 423 12/16/2004 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME PERS ER Paid Member Cantr Pmt 89,502.63 89.502.63 424 12/16/2004 000389 U S C M WEST (OBRA), OBRA - Project Retirement Payment 2.726.60 2,726.60 96561 12/14/2004 000305 TARGET STORE Spark of Love toys/gift certificates 3.000.00 3.000.00 96562 12/16/2004 004594 2 HOT ACTIVEWEAR Sprts prgm prizes: Gildan T-shirts 57.11 Sprts prgm prizes: Gildan t-shirts 50.64 107.75 96563 12/16/2004 004973 ABACHERLI, LINDI leSO instructor earnings 374.40 leSO instructor earnings 141.84 516.24 96564 12/16/2004 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES Dee stand by DUI Screening svcs 500.00 500.00 96565 12/16/2004 004446 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL Membership: Steve Beswick 354626 240.00 240.00 96566 12/16/2004 008279 AMERICOMP INFOSYSTEMS I Misc. Computer Supplies: IS 75.43 75.43 96567 12/16/2004 002187 ANIMAL FRIENDS OF THE VALL Nav Animal control services 8,750.00 8,750.00 96568 12/16/2004 000101 APPLE ONE INC. Temp help PPE 11/27 Wills 906.88 Temp help PPE 11/27 Buchanan 324.00 Temp help PPE 12/04 Mason 57.38 1 ,288.26 96569 12/16/2004 008062 ARROW STAFF RESOURCES, I Temp help PPE 1215 Grove/Hear 2,789.96 2,789.96 96570 12/16/2004 005335 ARTIST TOUCH STUDIO Sister City Gift - framed photo 283.90 283.90 96571 12/16/2004 003203 ARTISTIC EMBROIDERY Info System Staff jackets 124.99 124.99 96572 12/16/2004 002648 AUTO CLUB OF SOUTHERN CA Membership: Ryan,Patrick 53956093 45.00 45.00 Page:l apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96573 12/16/2004 004778 BERRYMAN & HENIGAR INC Nav temp 8&8 inspector help: Grance 7,500.00 7,500.00 96574 12/16/2004 000128 BROWN & BROWN OF CALIF. I 04.05 Insurance policy renewal 208,514.50 04-05 Insurance policy renewal 65.547.88 274,062.38 96575 12/16/2004 003138 CAL MAT PW patch truck materials 1.846.95 1,846.95 96576 12/1612004 000790 CALIF OEPT OF PESTICIOE Certificate renewal: K.Harrington 60.00 60.00 96577 12/16/2004 000790 CALIF DEPT OF PESTICIOE Certificate renewal:D.Camberos 60.00 60.00 96578 12/16/2004 008411 CALIF DEPT OF REHABILlTATI Refund: Massage establishment 496.00 496.00 96579 12/16/2004 002534 CATERERS CAFE Refreshments: Breakfast w/Santa 2,670.00 2,670.00 96580 12/16/2004 000137 CHEVRON USA INC Police motorcycle fuel expense 527.88 eM vehicle fuel expense 80.90 608.78 96581 12/16/2004 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI Community Health Charities Payment 158.00 158.00 96582 12/16/2004 002756 COMPLETE EMBROIOERY OES Embroidered baseball caps for PD 323.25 323.25 96583 12/1612004 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS Jan/FeblMar Alarm monitoring SVCS 1.659.00 1,659.00 96584 12/16/2004 001923 CONVERSE CONSULTANTS Aug-Sept Geo Testing: Jefferson 751.00 751.00 96585 12/16/2004 003739 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATE OCI-Nav consultant update general pin 5.460.30 5,460.30 96586 12/16/2004 006954 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & HV A Plumbing repairs @ CRG 219.16 Plumbing repairs @ City Hall 191.43 410.59 96587 12/1612004 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Dee Lease/earn Chrgs:Police 2.086.14 2,086.14 96588 12/16/2004 008413 D'SOUZA, NEIL Refund: Security DepstMPSC 100.00 100.00 96589 12/16/2004 001393 DATA TICKET INC Oct prkg citation processing svcs 306.00 Oct prkg citation processing svcs 200.00 506.00 96590 12/16/2004 007057 DERNBACH. ESTHER MARIE TCSD instructor earnings 604.80 TCSD instructor earnings 504.00 1.108.80 Page2 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96591 12/16/2004 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable Restroom: Bttrild Stage Prk 77.48 Portable Restroom:Riverton Prk 57.48 Portable Restroom:Veterans Prk 57.48 Portable Restroom:Lg Canyon Prk 57.48 Portable Restroom:Vail Ranch Prk 57.48 Credit: Items returned: Bttrfd Stage Pk -20.00 287.40 96592 12/16/2004 002701 DIVERSIFIED RISK Nav special events premiums 1,603.16 1,603.16 96593 12/16/2004 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI Fuel for city vehicles: Gode Enf 61384 32.99 32.99 96594 12/16/2004 002577 ENGINEERING RESOURCES Sept-Oct svcs:Wolf Creek Storm Drain 196.00 196.00 96595 12/16/2004 000164 ESGIL CORPORATION Nov B&S Plan Check sves 26,009.57 26.009.57 96596 12/16/2004 006487 EUROPEAN CAFE & VINEYARD Refreshments:4th Otr ae luncheon 3,237.89 RefreshmentCouncil closed session 202.03 3,439.92 96597 12/16/2004 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Oct Idscp mntc: Sports Parks 32.219.00 Oct Idscp mntc: South Slopes 25.731.00 Oct Idscp mntc: North Slopes 22,173.00 Oct ldscp mntc: Medians 6.924.00 Oct Idscp mntc: City Facilities 6.686.00 Oct Idscp impr: Slope Area 2.308.00 Oct Idscape impr: Slope Area 1,933.98 Irrigation Repairs: Slopes 1,847.37 Oct Idscp impr: Santiago Rd 950.00 Oct Idscp impr: Sports Park 675.00 Oct Idscp impr: Slope Area 550.00 Oclldscp impr: Vail Ranch 502.00 Oct Idscp impr: Slope Area 454.35 Oct Idscp impr: Mntc Fac. 408.00 Oct Idscp impr: Old Town 360.00 Oct Idscp impr: Sports Park 350.00 Oct Idscp impr: Medians 288.00 Oct Idscape impr: Slope Area 225.00 Irrigation repairs: TCC 177.90 Oct Idscp impr: Slope Area 72.00 104,834.60 96598 12/16/2004 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services 21.00 21.00 96599 12/16/2004 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Payment Case # 452379267 75.00 75.00 96600 12/16/2004 000795 FRED PRYOR SEMINARS/CARE Trng:Managing Priorities:01/12:Casey 149.00 149.00 Page::! apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 4 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96601 12/16/2004 004944 FULLCOURT PRESS Business license applications printing 1.516.65 1.516.65 96602 12/16/2004 007866 G C S SUPPLIES INC computer printer toner supplies 705.07 computer printer toner supplies 337.74 1.042.81 96603 12/16/2004 003946 G T ENTERTAINMENT Me for breakfast w/Santa 250.00 Me for Holiday tree lighting ceremony 50.00 300.00 96604 12/16/2004 004514 G T S I CORP 8-Panasonic 18" tablet pes 41,049.39 41,049.39 96605 12/16/2004 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS Office Supplies: Land Devel. 771.72 Shelving for T. Museum 538.48 Office Supplies: Planning 523.99 Office Supplies: Finance 432.62 Office Supplies: City Manager 346.39 Office Supplies: Fire Dept 233.84 Office Supplies: Human Resources 190.13 Office Supplies: Info System 181.99 Office Supplies: Bldg & Safety 179.19 Office Supplies: Sr. Center 158.31 Office Supplies: RDA/Low-Mod 108.95 Office Supplies: TCSD 107.13 Office Supplies: Central Sves 102.50 Office Supplies: Records Mgmt 34.44 Office Supplies: City Clerk 26.91 3,936.59 96606 12/16/2004 005947 GOLDEN STATE OVERNIGHT Express Mail Service: Fire Prevo 27.39 27.39 96607 12/16/2004 008409 GOLOVICH, MICHAEL Refund: Overpmt of Bldg fees 70.20 70.20 96608 12/16/2004 000175 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFI Applic Fee:Excellence in Financial Rp 550.00 550.00 96609 12/16/2004 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC Hardware supplies:T.& C.Museums 136.89 136.89 96610 12/16/2004 002372 HARMON. JUDY TCSD instructor earnings 151.20 151.20 96611 12/16/2004 008412 HIGGINS, CORBIN Refund: Ovrpmt-Temp use permit 97.00 97.00 96612 12/16/2004 001013 HINDERLITER DE LLAMAS & AS 4th Qtr Sales tax & recovery srvcs 13.933.74 13.933.74 96613 12/16/2004 003624 HOWELL. ANN MARIE New tourism ad for existing publication 452.55 452.55 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96614 12/16/2004 004525 HUMANSCALE CORPORATION Ergonomic supplies: CIP 228.65 228.65 96615 12/16/2004 001060 HYATT HtI:CAPPO Conf:1/17-21:M.Vollmuth 430.08 430.08 96616 12/16/2004 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45 I C M A Retirement Trust 457 Pmt 7,328.62 7,328.62 96617 12/16/2004 006924 INTL MUNiCIPAL SIGNAL Membership: Richard Uribe 21276 60.00 60.00 96618 12/16/2004 001186 IRWIN,JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 476.00 476.00 96619 12/16/2004 004795 J B E S Telephone 1 yr. Contract: Pala Prk 360.00 360.00 96620 12/16/2004 004908 JIFFY LUBE 1878 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Sves 33.79 33.79 96621 12/16/2004 003046 K FRO G 95.1 FM RADIO Radio broadcasting: Summer Nights 696.00 696.00 96622 12/16/2004 002424 KELLEY DISPLAY INC Car show banners cleaning/date chg 1.404.91 1,404.91 96623 12/16/2004 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAT Nav affordable housing consulting svc 13,365.02 13,365.02 96624 12/16/2004 001719 L P A INC Nav prof. SVCS: Library project 3,443.45 3,443.45 96625 12/16/2004 006744 LAMAR CORPORATION. THE Dee billboard advertising: Old Town 2,700.00 2,700.00 96626 12/16/2004 008410 LAMB'S FELLOWSHIP Refund: Security Deposit CRe 100.00 100.00 96627 12/16/2004 003286 LIBRARY SYSTEMS & SERVICE Nav svcs-library system agrmnt 10,028.00 Nav svcs-library system agnnnt 1,268.68 11.296.68 96628 12/16/2004 008414 LICITRA, ALDO Reimb:Arrest-Search-Seizure: 12J6~1 0 100.00 100.00 96629 12/16/2004 004697 LOWES HIW INC Mise hardware supplies: Fire 304.11 Mise hardware supplies: Fire 167.83 471.94 96630 12/16/2004 004087 LOWES INC Mise Hardware Suppfies: eRC 192.31 Mise hardware supplies: TCSD 133.06 325.37 96631 12/16/2004 004776 M P SIGNS vehicle renumberinglstriping:Fire Prev 734.00 734.00 PageS apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 6 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96632 12/16/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC custodial supplies: City Hall 276.14 276.14 96633 12/16/2004 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER temp help w/e 11/28 HooflDankworth 697.44 697.44 96634 12/16/2004 000220 MAURICE PRINTERS INC printing svcs:Temecula newsletter 5,634.25 5.634.25 96635 12/16/2004 000944 MCCAIN TRAFFIC SUPPLY INC traffic poles/mast arms:Muirfield/Pech. 14.636.44 14,636.44 96636 12/16/2004 006571 MELODY'S AD WORKS Old Town holiday promotion SVCS 3.000.00 3,000.00 96637 12/16/2004 007210 MIDORI GARDENS Nav ldscp maint: neighborhood prks 30,000.00 install shrubs/tree @ Butterfield Park 314.00 irrigation repairs: Rotary Park 119.98 irrigation repairs: Vail Ranch Park 83.42 30.517.40 96638 12/16/2004 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS business cards; M. Allen 114.86 business cards: B. Beers 114.86 business cards: K. Harrington 114.86 business cards: B. Deyo 114.86 business cards: T. Arborgast 114.86 574.30 96639 12/16/2004 000883 MONTELEONE EXCAVATING remove siltldebris:DePortola Channel 9,850.00 install fence: Pechanga Pkwy Ph liB 600.00 10,450.00 96640 12/16/2004 001214 MORNINGSTAR PRODUCTION announcer for holiday parade: 12/1 0 1.300.00 1,300.00 96641 12/16/2004 004898 NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTHCAR Community Service Funding Award 5,000.00 5,000.00 96642 12/16/2004 008407 NELSON, GAIL Refund:Sec.Deposit:TCC 150.00 150.00 96643 12/16/2004 002139 NORTH COUNTY TIMES Nov holiday ads: TCSD/RDA 1,862.06 Nov public ntcs:City ClerklPW/PJn 702.90 2,564.96 96644 12/16/2004 002292 OASIS VENDING coffeelkitchen supplies: City Hall 258.60 coffeelkitchen supplies: Maint Fac 51.72 310.32 96645 12/16/2004 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 231.24 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 151.22 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 65.00 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 49.95 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 49.95 547.36 96646 12/16/2004 002668 OMEGA LAKE SERVICES Nov Duck Pond water maint. svcs 620.00 620.00 Page:6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 12/16/2004 2:56:21 PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96647 12/16/2004 008406 ONARECKER, SHASTA M Refund:Sec. DepositCRC 12/2 100.00 100.00 96648 12/16/2004 000472 PARADISE CHEVROLET CADI 2005 Chevy Trailblazer:PW 27,208.87 2005 Chevy Impala:B&S Dept 17,457.78 44.666.65 96649 12/16/2004 002099 PASCOE MANAGEMENT LLP Dee lease:Old town restroom 826.00 826.00 96650 12/16/2004 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COM PAN equipment repairs: TCSD Maint 292.10 parts for equip repairs: TCSD Maint 119.98 412.08 96651 12/16/2004 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG PERS Long Term Care Payment 288.55 288.55 96652 12/16/2004 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 634.62 Petty Cash Reimbursement 222.07 856.69 96653 12/16/2004 000253 POSTMASTER Express Mail & Postal SVC5 80.95 80.95 96654 12/16/2004 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE COM PAN Old Town holiday ads for RDA 342.00 342.00 96655 12/16/2004 002176 RANCHO CALIF BUS PRK ASSN Jan-Mar Business Park Dues: Diaz 1,948.77 Jan-Mar Business Park Dues: C.H. 1,417.29 Jan-Mar Bus.Prk Dues:C.H. Adj Prop 1.169.26 4,535.32 96656 12/16/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 5,236.43 Various Water Meters 3,838.93 Various Water Meters 65.58 9.140.94 96657 12/16/2004 006738 RANCHO COMMUNITY CHURC Refund:Bldg permit31352 RComm. 110.00 110.00 96658 12/16/2004 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING electrical supplies: Parks 318.34 electrical supplies: Parks 105.51 electrical supplies: CRG 98.70 electrical supplies: T. Museum 57.67 580.22 96659 12/16/2004 006408 REYNOLDS, AMY Refund:Sec. DepositCRC 10/26/04 100.00 100.00 96660 12/16/2004 000352 RIVERSIDE CO ASSESSOR Nov Assessor Maps: B&S Dept 3.00 3.00 96661 12/16/2004 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR Oct parking citation assessments 1,690.50 1,690.50 96662 12/16/2004 000873 ROBERTS, RONALD H. reimb;Nat'l League Cf:11/30.1214 44.62 44.62 96663 12/16/2004 002226 RUSSO, MARY ANNE TCSD Instructor Earnings 776.00 776.00 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 12/1612004 2:56:21PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96664 12/16/2004 007113 RYLE, SHEILA H. TCSD Instructor Earnings 1,108.80 TCSD Instructor Earnings 403.20 TCSD Instructor Earnings 100.80 1.612.80 96665 12/16/2004 000277 S & S ARTS & CRAFTS INC TCSD special event supplies 119.67 Credit: Items returned -11.98 107.69 96666 12/16/2004 005227 SAN DIEGO COUNTY OF Support Payment Case # DF099118 25.00 25.00 96667 12/16/2004 006815 SAN DIEGO. COUNTY OF Support Payment Account # 58109502 12.50 12.50 96668 12/16/2004 008405 SHAFFER POOLS INC Refund: overpayment of fees 72.00 72.00 96669 12/16/2004 008281 SIGN-A-RAMA Fac Imprv Prgm: Art Diaspora 1,636.72 1,636.72 96670 12/16/2004 000645 SMART & FINAL INC supplies for holiday parade 136.78 MPSC Recreation Supplies 83.48 CRG Teen Program Supplies 74.77 295.03 96671 12/16/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Dee 2-01-202~7330 City street lamps 38,621.88 Dee 2-01-202-7603 various mtrs 16,187.98 Nav 2-00-397-5059 various mtrs 9,390.01 Nav 2-05-791-8807 Nov 4,737.89 Dee 2-00-987-0775 Vail Ranch 4,655.72 Dee 2-02-351-5281 CRC 4,187.71 Dee 2-06-105-0654 various rntrs 2,603.07 Dee 2-20-798-3248 C. Museum 1,065.77 Dee 2-10-331-1353 Fire Stn 84 852.71 Nav 2-24-151-6582 various mtrs 144.88 82,447.62 96672 12/16/2004 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST bee pest control svcs: Maint Fac 84.00 84.00 96673 12/16/2004 000293 STADIUM PIZZA refreshments:Duck Pond tree lighting 77.33 77.33 96674 12/16/2004 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS Misc office supplies: Finance 206.71 206.71 96675 12/16/2004 004221 SUSAN G KOMEN INLAND VAL 2004 Sponsorship:Race for the Cure 25,000.00 25,000.00 96676 12/16/2004 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR Fire Prev vehicle repair/maint svcs 103.95 103.95 96677 12/16/2004 006914 TEMECULA COPiERS INC. Nov copier usage chrgs:City Facilities 4,558.59 4,558.59 Page:8 apChkLst 12/16/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2:56:21 PM Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Description Vendor 96678 12/16/2004 000168 TEMECULA FLOWER CORRAL Sunshine Fund 96679 12/16/2004 005633 TEMECULA MIDDLE SCHOOL pertormance:O.T. holiday:12/11/04 96680 12/16/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith svcs: City HalllT. Museum 96681 12/16/2004 003140 TEMECULA VALLEY TAEKWON TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings 96682 12/16/2004 003858 TOM RONEY ROOFING Refund:overpayment of fees:29762 Refund:overpayment of tees:29760 96683 12/16/2004 007433 TOVEY SHULTZ CONSTRUCTIO Prgs pmt #8: Community Theater stop ntc:C.E.D.lComm. Theater prjt 96684 12/16/2004 006192 TRIST AFF GROUP temp help w/e 11/07 LonglTidwell temp help w/e 11/21 LongITidwell temp help w/e 11/14 LonglTidwell 96685 12/16/2004 002706 US POSTAL SERVICE AIS viewer carrier route subseT 96686 12/16/2004 007766 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALE Dee Udrgmd svcs alert tickets:PW 96687 12/16/2004 004981 UNISOURCE SCREENING & 11/16-30/04 bckgrnd screening svc 96688 12/16/2004 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 96689 12/16/2004 004794 V ALLEY WINDS COMMUNITY B pertormance:O.T. holiday 12/11/04 96690 12/16/2004 003665 VARTEC SOLUTIONS INC Nov long distance phone SVCS 96691 12/16/2004 006941 VERISIGN INC. Payflow Pro Pricing svcs:Safari Sys. Amount Paid Check Total 129.20 150.00 33.47 60.00 60.00 40.00 40.00 40.00 25.00 20.00 19.60 19.60 343.947.15 -4,162.84 1,425.13 1.323.40 1,063.40 50.00 96.60 96.00 213.00 150.00 25.05 850.00 129.20 150.00 33.47 285.00 39.20 339,784.31 3,811.93 50.00 96.60 96.00 213.00 150.00 25.05 850.00 Page:9 apChkLst 12/16/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 2:56:21 PM Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Description Amount Paid Check Total Vendor 96692 12/1612004 004261 VERIZON Dee xxx-5072 general usage Nav xxx-5509 general usage Nav xxx-1540 general usage Dec xxx-1941 PT A CD TT ACSD Dee xxx-3851 general usage Nav xxx.1999 general usage Nov xxx-2629 Naggar Nov xxx-0049 general usage 4,662.71 147.49 90.10 58.03 39.98 37.40 29.29 28.22 96693 12/16/2004 004279 VERIZON CALIFORNIA INC. Nav access-CRG phone line Nav access-C. Museum phone line 348.48 292.72 96694 12/16/2004 004789 VERIZON INTERNET SOLUTION Internet svcslEOC backup @ sIn 84 72.35 96695 12/16/2004 004864 VINEYARD OF THE NEW WINE- Community Service Funding Award 5,000.00 96696 12/16/2004 002658 VOLLMUTH, MARY ee computer loan prgm 1,174.47 96697 12/16/2004 003063 WEAVER PACIFIC PUBLlCATI 2005 Official Visitors Guide wls 5,226.00 9669B 12/1612004 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC Nov Citywide tree trimming svcs 12,000.00 96699 12/16/2004 000621 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNC Nov '04 TUMF fees 86,43B.43 96700 12/16/2004 008402 WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNT Nov 2004 MSHCP payment 4,953.00 96701 12/16/2004 002109 WHITE CAP INDUSTRIES INC Misc supplies for PW Mainl Div 12.95 96702 12/16/2004 003932 WOODSIOE HOMES OF CALIF I Refund: Eng. Deposit: TM29798-7 1,030.00 96703 12116/2004 003776 ZQLL MEDICAL CORPORATION defibrillator paddles/sensor:Paramedic 1,816.47 Grand total for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 5,093.22 641.20 72.35 5,000.00 1,174.47 5.226.00 12,000.00 86,438.43 4,953.00 12.95 1,030.00 1,816.47 1,4BO,574.50 Page:l0 apChkLsI Final Check List Page: 1 12/22/2004 8:23:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96704 12/22/2004 001587 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS AS 2005 membership dues: G. Butler 152.50 152.50 96705 12/22/2004 001823 ATKINSON, DAVID MICHAEL Ctd 88.12 reimbursement 192.48 192.48 96706 12/22/2004 004855 BABER, GABRIELE TCSD instructor earnings 294.40 TCSD instructor earnings 192.00 486.40 96707 12/22/2004 003984 BENOIT, VINCENT H......... Santa Claus: Old Town Holiday 500.00 Deduction: DA# 16-28-86 -187.50 312.50 96708 12/22/2004 006908 C C & COMPANY INC D.T. holiday entertainment 750.00 Marionette show:12/12:0.T. holiday 600.00 Santa Claus suit rental: MPSC 150.00 1.500.00 96709 12/22/2004 008422 CHAVEZ, SANDRA refund:sec. deposit:CRC 11/28/04 100.00 100.00 96710 12/22/2004 008421 CHENG, LEONILA refund: room rental/sec. deposit 357.00 357.00 96711 12/22/2004 005708 CLEAR CHANNEL BROADCASTI '04 Holiday advertising svcs 930.00 ESG Weekend advertising svcs 510.00 1.440.00 96712 12/22/2004 008425 CONSTRUCTION REHABILlTA Refund: Pin Deposit 909370037 62.52 62.52 96713 12/22/2004 008424 COVE EQUITY GROUP. THE Refund: Pin Deposit 922110013 601.00 601.00 96714 12/22/2004 008426 DE ROBERT, RAYMOND Refund: Admin Citation 1901 25.00 25.00 96715 12/22/2004 003610 DOMENOE, JIM Reimb: MS Project 2003 Software 77.97 77.97 96716 12/22/2004 000523 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER 95366-02 Deigo Dr Ldscp 29.63 29.63 96717 12/22/2004 005692 ELMO, ANTHONY Reimb:I.C.C.:9/26-28/04 286.90 286.90 96718 12/22/2004 008372 FAGERNESS, TARYN Speaker:Erle Stanley Gardner Mystery 250.00 250.00 96719 12/22/2004 003174 FIREHOUSE MAGAZINE 1 yr subscription for Stn 84 30.00 30.00 Page:1 apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 2 12/22/2004 8:23:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96720 12/22/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER SOUTHWEST AIRLINES MN AirFare: D.C. Coni 01/19.22/05 770.70 HYATT TT htl:MISAC Conl:l1n-8/04 263.20 AARON BROTHERS ART & FRA SJ recogn awards: Stone 221.70 STADIUM PIZZA SJ refreshments: YouthlGovt 11/16 117.18 BARNES AND NOBLE STORE TT Microsoft Sharepoint Pro:I.S. Opt 67.87 STADIUM PIZZA SJ refreshments: Gift Giving Campaig 47.96 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & SJ copy fees for recorded documents 41.00 MICHAELS STORES INC SJ holiday supplies:Council Chambers 37.66 CALIFORNIA PIZZA KITCHEN TT library mtg: 11/18/04 32.60 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN SJ recogn supplies:Council mtg 12114 28.00 EARTHLlNK INC TT Council members internet sves 26.45 TARGET STORE SJ holiday supplies:Council Chambers 17.75 AARON BROTHERS ART & FRA SJ recogn. certificate: Stone 16.15 FIVE STAR PARKING LOT JO parking:Auto Mall Hearing:12/1 16.00 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MN mise computer supplies 11.84 WORLD CHOICE TRAVEL MN booking fee: D.C. Coni 1/19.22/05 10.50 TT Additional Bank charges 1.75 1,728.31 96721 12/22/2004 004053 HABITAT WEST INC Lg Canyon Detention Basin Mnte 450.00 450.00 96722 12/22/2004 006081 HALL & FOREMAN INC Prof. Survey Srvcs: long Canyon 5,720.00 5,720.00 96723 12/22/2004 008427 HAPIOT. MICHELE NELLY Refund: Admin Citation 1901 25.00 25.00 96724 12/22/2004 006356 HORIZON MECHANICAL OF CA Install pool water heater: CRC 33, 110.00 33,110.00 96725 12/22/2004 001186 IRWIN, JOHN TCSD instructor earnings 96.00 96.00 96726 12/22/2004 002575 JONES, SUSAN W. '04 New Law/Ejection Sern:121B.9 6.00 6.00 96727 12/22/2004 004051 LOR GEOTECHNICAL GROUP Geotech testPechanga Storm Drain 2,697.50 Geotech testPechanga Storm Drain 2,407.50 5,105.00 Page2 apChkLst 12/22/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA B:23:59AM Page: 3 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Description Vendor 96728 1212212004 003975 LAWRENCE, JEFF Computer purchase program 96729 1212212004 008423 LIFE CHURCH OF TEMECULA V refund:sec.depositCRC 12112104 96730 1212212004 006897 LORY, SUSAN, J. TCSD instructor earnings leBD instructor earnings leSO instructor earnings leBD instructor earnings leSO instructor earnings leSO instructor earnings 96731 1212212004 004697 LOWES HIW INC res imprv prgm: Benazngo, Ronald 96732 1212212004 000394 MAINTENANCE basic supervision:1/19-20/0S 96733 12122/2004 005887 MOFFATT & NICHOL ENGINEER Oct Prof Svcs: F.V.Pkwy SIB off-ramp 96734 1212212004 007096 MUSICIANS WORKSHOP entertainmentO.T. Holidays 96735 1212212004 005372 OASIS CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHI Refund:Sec. DepositCRC 12111/04 96736 12122/2004 002100 OBJECT RADIANCE INC TCSD Instructor Earnings leSO Instructor Earnings TCSD Instructor Earnings leBD Instructor Earnings 96737 12122/2004 005819 ORANGE CO DA FAMILY SUPP support pmt 16-28-86 96738 12/22/2004 005850 PAISNER, WILLIAM Relund:Sec. DepositCRC 12/12/04 96739 12/22/2004 003218 PELA Oct Idscp inspect svc:Soundwall Oct Idscp dsgn svc:W.C.Sprts Cmplx 96740 12/22/2004 002185 POSTMASTER - TEMECULA postage for CSD wtr/spr brochures 96741 12122/2004 003697 PROJECT DESIGN CONSULTAN 10/11-11/14/04 dsgn svc:Murr. Creek 10/11-11/14/04 dsgn svc:SR79median 96742 12122/2004 008419 PUTERBAUGH, CECELlA Refund:Sec. DepositCRC 12/04/04 96743 12/22/2004 004029 R J M DESIGN GROUP INC Oct dsgn SVCS: W.C. Sports Complex Amount PaId Check Total 624.94 100.00 367.50 311.50 294.00 227.50 196.00 175.00 775.45 120.00 64,845.55 400.00 100.00 364.80 230.40 136.80 136.80 187.50 100.00 495.00 180.00 4,519.39 7,804.52 6,222.50 100.00 20,315.27 624.94 100.00 1,571.50 775.45 120.00 64,845.55 400.00 100.00 868.80 187.50 100.00 675.00 4,519.39 14.027.02 100.00 20,315.27 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 12/22/2004 8:23:59AM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96744 12/22/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 5,914.54 Dee 01-02-98010-0 Fire Stn 84 174.16 Dee 01-04-10033-2 Marg. Rd. 104.57 Dee 01-02-98000-0 Fire Stn 84 12.73 6.206.00 96745 12/22/2004 003591 RENES COMMERCIAL MANAGE annual weed spraying/City's R.O.W.'s 9,500.00 Street clean-up/City R.O.W.'s 4,500.00 14,000.00 96746 12/22/2004 002110 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATI equip fuel usage: PW Maint 13.94 13.94 96747 12/22/2004 008420 RICE, BRETT Refund:permit lee5:41925 Kaffirboom 141.95 141.95 96748 12/22/2004 006483 RICHARDS, TYREASHA I. TCSD Instructor Earnings 200.00 200.00 96749 12/22/2004 005406 RIVERSIDE CO TRAIN OFF. Mgmt 2A: 02/14-17. 19/05: J.Neuman 130.00 130.00 96750 12/22/2004 003587 RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC light towers: holiday light parade 4,143.36 4,143.36 96751 12/22/2004 007830 ROAD BUILDERS INC prgs pmt #5: Pechanga Pkwy PhllB 477,865.83 477,865.83 96752 12/22/2004 004872 SANTA MARGARITA Community Service Funding Award 2,500.00 2.500.00 96753 12/22/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Nav 2-19-999-9442 various mtrs 1,444.96 Dee 2-25-393-4681 T.E.S. Pool 651.48 Dee 2-23-365-5992 Fire Stn 92 435.39 Dee 2-24-628-8963 Btrfld Stage 29.23 2,561.06 96754 12/22/2004 000282 SO CALIF MUNICIPAL ATHLETI SCMAF Instilute:1 017104:9 TCSD Staff 490.00 490.00 96755 12/22/2004 004465 STITCH PRO Embroidery svcs:Temecula Police 745.63 745.63 96756 12/22/2004 004221 SUSAN G KOMEN INLAND VAL sponsorship:H.S. educational literature 5.000.00 5,000.00 96757 12/22/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY locksmith svcs: Harveston Camm etr 364.59 locksmith svcs: C. Museum 95.00 459.59 96758 12/22/2004 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED S Refund:Sec. DepositTCC 150.00 150.00 96759 12/22/2004 004030 TEMECULA VOLUNTEER FIRE support/training reimbursement 2,808.10 2,808.10 96760 12/22/2004 004001 U C REGENTS Suburban growth/20 yrs:01/21/05 95.00 95.00 Page:4 apChkLsI 12/22/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA B:23:59AM Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Amount Paid Vendor Description Check Total 96761 12/22/2004 004001 U C REGENTS Suburban growth/20 yrs:01/21/05 95.00 95.00 96762 12/22/2004 004001 U C REGENTS Suburban growth/20 yrs:01/21/05 95.00 96763 12/22/2004 007118 US TELPACIFIC CORPORATIO Dee Internet IP Addresses Block 539.75 96764 12/22/2004 004261 VERIZON Dee xxx-0074 general usage Dee xxx-Q073 general usage Dee xxx-1473 P.D. O.T. Stn Dee xxx-3564 alarm Dee xxx-8573 general usage Dee xxx-5473 Moraga Rd 253.58 233.95 99.85 56.43 30.64 28.22 96765 12/22/2004 008418 WOODSIDE WOLF CREEK 1211 Refund:permit fees:TR29798-1 17-18 Refund:permit fees:TR29798-1 44-48 22.52 22.51 96766 12/22/2004 001544 YEAGER SKANSKA INC Prgs pm! #7: Peehanga Pkwy PhllA 178,888.39 Grand lotal for UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 95.00 539.75 702.67 45.03 178.888.39 859.350.93 PageS apChkLst 12/29/2004 Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA 3:14:34PM Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA Check # Date Vendor Description 425 12/29/2004 000389 US C M WEST (OBRA), OBRA. Project Retirement Payment 426 12/29/2004 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' RETIREME PERS ER Paid Member Contr pmt 427 12/29/2004 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) State Disability Jns Payment 428 12/29/2004 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) Federal Income Taxes Payment 429 12/29/2004 001065 NATIONWiDE RETIREMENT SO Nationwide Retirement Payment 96767 12/29/2004 002038 ACTION POOL & SPA SUPPLY Aquatics pool supplies 96768 12/29/2004 004765 ACTIVE NE1WORK INC. THE RecWare Safari Main!. & Software 96769 12/29/2004 004064 ADELPHIA Dec-Jan high speed internet svcs 96770 12/29/2004 000106 ALFAX WHOLESALE FURNITUR Chairs for Harveston Park Facility 96771 12/29/2004 002877 AL TA LOMA CHARTER LINES 2004 Holiday Lights Bus Tour 12/12 96772 12/29/2004 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening DUI Drug & Alcohol Screening QUI Drug & Alcohol Screening QUI Drug & Alcohol Screening 96773 12/29/2004 000101 APPLE ONE INC. Temp help PPE 12/04 WillS/Plaseen Temp help PPE 12111 Buchanan Temp help PPE 12/04 Lynn 96774 12/29/2004 008062 ARROW STAFF RESOURCES, I Temp help PPE 12/12 Grove/Heer Temp help PPE 12/19 Grove/Heer 96775 12/29/2004 008437 BETZ, MARTIN Reimb: Airtare tor second interview 96776 12/29/2004 004262 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES Nov-Dec DUI Drug & Alcohol Screen Nov QUI Drug & Alcohol Screening Amount Paid Check Total 2.145.68 90,639.22 17,741.88 66,660.39 4,291.65 112.38 17,656.39 40.95 922.07 751.88 403.95 390.00 155.00 34.45 751.60 108.00 3,146.04 1.840.33 700.00 1,006.20 573.97 2,145.68 90.639.22 17.741.88 66,660.39 4.291.65 112.38 17.656.39 40.95 922.07 751.88 963.40 1,399.60 4,986.37 700.00 1,580.17 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96777 12/29/2004 006721 BOISE CASCADE OFFICE Space Plan Modifications 6,336.47 Office Supplies: City Hall Space Plan 890.43 Office Supplies: Finance 100.19 Office Supplies: Finance 31.71 Office Supplies: Finance 22.95 7.381.75 96778 12/29/2004 007243 BROOKSTONE Service Award For Employees 1.599.42 1.599.42 96779 12/29/2004 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Annual CACE Dues: Grove, Jeff 40.00 40.00 96780 12/29/2004 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Annual CACE Dues: Voshall, Jean 40.00 40.00 96781 12/29/2004 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Annual CACE Dues: Cole, Tom 40.00 40.00 96782 12/29/2004 005321 CALIF ASSOC OF CODE Annual CACE Dues: Parker, Marianne 40.00 40.00 96783 12/29/2004 005384 CALIF BAGEL BAKERY & DELI refreshments: PW team bldg 12/08 518.55 refreshments: Council mtg 232.74 refreshments: Council mtg 10/26 181.02 932.31 96784 12/29/2004 000837 CALIF DEPT OF FRANCHISE T State Withholding Payment 185.00 185.00 96785 12/29/2004 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUSTICElACCT fingerprinting ID svcs:HR & Police 2.348.00 2,348.00 96786 12/29/2004 002543 CALIF DEPT OF WATER Annual Waste Discharge Fees 11.109.00 11,109.00 96787 12/29/2004 004604 CALPELRA 2005 membership dues: G. Yates 255.00 255.00 96788 12/29/2004 005417 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY First aid supplies: City Halt 55.73 First aid supplies: Maintenance 41.89 97.62 96789 12/29/2004 008435 COLDWELL BANKER 1 st place winner: Electric Parade 200.00 200.00 96790 12/29/2004 004405 COMMUNITY HEALTH CHARI Community Health Charities Payment 127.00 127.00 96791 12/29/2004 001193 COMP USA INC Computer Supplies for IS dept 293.03 293.03 96792 12/29/2004 003739 COTTON BRIDGES ASSOCIATE Nov-Dec consuJtantupdate gnl plan 5,790.26 5.790.26 96793 12/29/2004 002631 COUNTS UNLIMITED INC Citywide traffic count collection svcs 765.00 765.00 Page2 apChkLsl Final Check List Page: 3 12129/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96794 12129/2004 004123 D L PHARES & ASSOCIATES Lease & Carn Chrgs:Police 5tn 2.186.14 Lease & Carn Chrgs:Police 5tn -100.00 2,086.14 96795 12129/2004 004194 D L T SOLUTIONS INC Autocad 2005 For Info System 6.888.95 Autocad 2005 For Info System 905.10 7.794.05 96796 12129/2004 005766 DATA BUSINESS SYSTEMS INC W2Jl099 forms and envelopes 257.44 257.44 96797 12129/2004 004569 DAVID TAUSSIG & ASSOCIATE Special tax consulting: Roripaugh CFD 1,681.01 1,681.01 96798 12129/2004 002990 DAViD TURCH & ASSOCIATES Jan Federal lobbyist svcs 3,000.00 3.000.00 96799 12129/2004 003383 DEAMER APPLIANCE SERVICE Repair Sin 84 Dishwasher 78.00 78.00 96800 12129/2004 008436 DECRAUSAZ, LISA Refund: CPR & First Aid Training 45.00 45.00 96801 12129/2004 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL Portable Restroom:Children'sMuseum 114.95 Portable Restroom:Bttrtld Stage Prk 67.48 182.43 96802 12/29/2004 004192 DOWNS COMMERCIAL FUELI Fuel for city vehicles: TCSD 61343 774.07 Fuel for city vehicles: PW 61353 680.94 1,455.01 96803 12129/2004 001669 DUNN EDWARDS CORPORATI PW graffiti removal supplies 95.73 95.73 96804 12129/2004 002528 EAGLE GRAPHIC CREATIONS I New employee glass mugs 119.60 119.60 96805 12/29/2004 008399 ELSINORE VALLEY RENTALS Light Tower Rentals: Holiday Parade 161.00 161.00 96806 12/29/2004 005251 EQUIPMENT REPAIR SERVICE Repair/Maint. PW Truck 635.77 Repair/Maint. PW Patch Truck 544.88 1,180.65 96807 12129/2004 008434 ERDEL YI, ANA Refund: Dep. Tract 3929 Lot 148 995.00 995.00 96808 12/29/2004 006487 EUROPEAN CAFE & VINEYARD Museum Docent Brunch 963.02 refreshments: Nakayama Visit 148.43 1.111.45 96809 12/29/2004 001056 EXCEL LANDSCAPE Irrigation Repairs: Sports Park 470.15 Irrigation Repairs: Slopes 429.20 Irrigation Repairs: Slopes 367.92 Irrigation Repairs: Medians 344.70 Irrigation Repairs: Sports Park/School 308.39 1,920.36 96810 12/29/2004 004464 EXXONMOBIL CARD SERVICES Fuel expense for City vehicles 62.77 62.77 Page3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96811 12/29/2004 000478 FAST SIGNS Facade Imp Prog: Old Town Leather 1.636.00 Sports Park Signs -Field Closed" 377.13 City Seal Sign PW CIP Pool Vehicle 77.22 2,090.35 96812 12/29/2004 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC Express mail services 61.85 61.85 96813 12/29/2004 000166 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE Lot Book Report: Kester 75.00 Lot Book Report: Williams/Ritter 75.00 Lot Book Report: Morton 75.00 Lot Book Report: Lehman 75.00 300.00 96814 12/29/2004 003347 FIRST BANKCARD CENTER FORGE, THE DU rfrshmnts:PlnlComm. team bldg 300.42 BAILY WINE COUNTRY CAFE DU Creditdupl billing of sales tax -5.26 295.16 96815 12/29/2004 003281 FOREMOST PROMOTIONS Crime prevention supplies 743.55 Crime prevention .supplies 397.41 Crime prevention supplies 370.17 1,511.13 96816 12/29/2004 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD Support Payment Case#452379267 75.00 75.00 96817 12/29/2004 004944 FULLCOURT PRESS Business License Certificates 413.01 413.01 96818 12/29/2004 003946 G T ENTERTAINMENT Holiday Light ParadeJBus Tour 300.00 300.00 96819 12/29/2004 000711 GRAPHICS UNLIMITED L1THOG Printing of Annual Recycling Calendar 9.780.47 9,780.47 96820 12/29/2004 002174 GROUP 1 PRODUCTIONS Video Taping: Erie Stanley Gardner 400.00 400.00 96821 12/29/2004 005209 GUZON, SUSAN Refund: Sec. Deposit: Tee 100.00 100.00 96822 12/29/2004 005311 H20 CERTIFIED POOL WATER Nav pool mnte SVC$ @ CRG I TES 1.500.00 1,500.00 96823 12/29/2004 001135 HEAL THPOINTE MEDICAL GRO New Hire Pre-employment physicals 135.00 135.00 96824 12/29/2004 003106 HERITAGE SECURITY SERVIC Security Guards: Veterans Memorial 649.00 649.00 96825 12/29/2004 004811 HEWLETT PACKARD HP Storage Works Software 3,176.47 2m LC.LC Fibre Channel Cable 118.53 3,295.00 96826 12/29/2004 002126 HILLYARD FLOOR CARE SUPPL CRC Gym floor cleaning supplies 116.16 116.16 Page:4 apChkLst 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 5 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96827 12/29/2004 005748 HODSON. CHERYL A. Support Payment 11.69 11.69 96828 12/29/2004 001517 HORIZON HEALTH Dee 04 EE Assistance Program 715.14 715.14 96829 12/29/2004 000194 I C M A RETIREMENT TRUST 45 Det Comp Catch Up Contribution 750.00 750.00 96830 12/29/2004 004406 IGOE & COMPANY INC Flex Benefit Plan Design 400.00 400.00 96831 12/29/2004 006713 iNTEGRATED MEDIA SYSTEMS Service Call: AMX Power Supply 1,296.04 1,296.04 96832 12/29/2004 001407 INTER VALLEY POOL SUPPLY I Pool sanitizin9 chemicals 127.15 127.15 96833 12/29/2004 007247 10MA SUBSCRIPTION 1099 CDs for Finance 96834 12/29/2004 003266 IRON MOUNTAIN OFFSITE Records mgmt microfilm storage unit 96835 12/29/2004 004265 JEWELL FENCE COMPANY Res Imp Prgm: Cockrell, Alice Res Imp prgm: Legg. Merrell 96836 12/29/2004 008241 JOHN WEBER CONSTRUCTION Rei Retention: Japanese Garden 96837 12/29/2004 003046 K FRO G 95.1 FM RADIO Radio broadcasting: Summer Nights 96838 12/29/2004 000206 KINKOS INC Stationery paper/mise supplies 96839 12/29/2004 004062 KUSTOM SIGNALS INC Radar Trailer:Police Smart VMS Tamper Alarm for trailer 96840 12/29/2004 000945 L P S COMPUTER SERViCE printer repair/maint svcs: 1.8. Dept. 96841 12/29/2004 000210 LEAGUE OF CALIF CITIES '05 City Membership Dues 449.00 449.00 586.50 586.50 2,530.00 1,100.00 3,630.00 6,786.00 6.786.00 780.00 780.00 20.11 20.11 24,227.59 242.44 24.470.03 85.00 85.00 16,852.00 16.852.00 96842 12/29/2004 004905 L1E8ERT, CASSIDY & WHITMOR Nov HR legal svcs for TE060-#QOO01 1,035.00 1.035.00 96843 12/29/2004 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS Citywide street name replacement prg various signs for Traffic Division 9.413.31 918.57 10,331.88 PageS apChkLsl Fillal Clleck list Page: 6 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96844 12/29/2004 004141 MAINTEX INC custodial supplies: C. Museum 470.84 custodial supplies: City Hall 158.77 custodial supplies: City Halt 43.25 Credit: custodial supplies returned -43.25 629.61 96845 12/29/2004 001967 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SER temp help wle 12/05 Hoof/Dankworth 1,162.40 temp help w/e 12/12 HooflDankworth 1,162.40 2,324.80 96846 12/29/2004 000217 MARGARITA OFFICIALS ASSN Nav/Dee Sports ?rgm Officiating Svcs 150.00 150.00 96847 12/29/2004 001384 MINUTEMAN PRESS window envelopes: CRCITCSD 244.46 business cards: DC/BW/JW/BS/DT 214.15 business cards: P.D.Stns/Dep.H 128.49 business cards: J. Domenoe 114.86 business cards: P. Ruse 114.86 business cards: A. Loera 42.83 business cards: L. Nottingham 42.83 902.48 96848 12/29/2004 001067 MITY UTE INC Tables:Harveston Park Facility 3,067.35 3.067.35 96849 12/29/2004 001892 MOBILE MODULAR Dee modular bldg rental:Fire SIn 92 832.40 832.40 96850 12/29/2004 007011 MORRIS MEYERS .MAINTENAN Nav maint svcs:park r.r.lpicnic shelle 4,690.00 credit: Nav svcs not provided @ T.E.S -210.00 4,480.00 96851 12/29/2004 002257 MOST DEPENDABLE FOUNTAI drinking fountain parts: var. park sites 876.00 876.00 96652 12/29/2004 008329 MURRIETA WEST HVAC Res Imp Pgrm: Gibbs, Vivian 3,225.00 3.225.00 96853 12/29/2004 002925 NAP A AUTO PARTS equip parts/supplies: PW Maint 67.10 equip parts/supplies: PW Maint 53.85 equip parts/supplies: PW Maint 30.15 151.10 96854 12/29/2004 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS mise office supplies: P.O. C.T. Stn 58.00 credit: item returned: P.O. OT. Stn -11.56 46.44 96855 12/29/2004 002105 OLD TOWN TIRE & SERVICE City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 754.52 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 547.54 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 522.11 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 135.61 City Vehicle Repair/Maint Svcs 19.19 1,978.97 96856 12/29/2004 002256 P & D CONSULTANTS INC Nov temp help bldg inspector: R.H. 10,385.76 10,385.76 96857 12/29/2004 004074 PARTY CITY OF TEMECULA IN MPSC recreation supplies 102.41 102.41 Page:6 apChkLst final Checklist Page: 7 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Cheek Total 96858 12/2912004 004538 PAULEY EQUIPMENT COMPAN battery for TCSD maint equipment 48.43 48.43 96859 12/29/2004 001958 PERS LONG TERM CARE PROG PEAS Long Term Care Payment 288.55 288.55 96860 12/29/2004 000249 PETTY CASH Petty Cash Reimbursement 522.11 522.11 96861 12/29/2004 007484 PHILIPS MEDICAL SYSTEMS I AED cabinet: Comm.Grant AED Prgm 282.85 282.85 96862 12/29/2004 007771 PPSN CORPORATION Refund: deposit CRG room rental 100.00 100.00 96863 12/29/2004 003493 PRO-CRAFT OVERHEAD DOOR Res Imp Pgrm: Betancourt, Robert 1,022.00 1.022.00 96864 12/29/2004 002880 PRO-CRAFT SASH & SUPPLY Res Imp Prgm: Hiscks, Rodney 3,561.00 3,561.00 96865 12/29/2004 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL SUPPL uniforms/mat/towel rentals: city facility 896.60 Credit: items not received: CRGIG.Mus -12.64 883.96 96866 12/29/2004 002012 R D 0 EQUIPMENT COMPANY maint/svcs for PW Maint back hoe 888.64 credit: sales tax on labor chrg -15.50 873.14 96867 12/29/2004 002612 RADIO SHACK INC mise computer supplies: I.S. dept. 56.61 56.61 96868 12/29/2004 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER DIST Various Water Meters 523.42 Dee 01-08-38009-0 Fire Stn 92 54.29 577.71 96869 12/29/2004 000947 RANCHO REPROGRAPHICS dupl blueprints: B&S dept. 72.95 dupl blueprints: B&S dept. 9.07 82.02 96870 12/29/2004 004584 REGENCY LIGHTING electrical supplies: City Hall 63.36 electrical supplies: C. Museum 28.45 credit: item returned -9.61 82.20 96871 12/29/2004 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK & nte/exemption filing fee: Heritage Tree 64.00 64.00 96872 12/29/2004 001592 RIVERSIDE CO INFO Nov emerg. radio rentals: Police 627.00 627.00 96873 12/29/2004 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS DEP Raves/Rave Drugs trn:L. Alves 11/22 29.00 29.00 96874 12/29/2004 003587 RIZZO CONSTRUCTION INC light towers: holiday light parade 5.049.92 5.049.92 96875 12/29/2004 003027 ROOFTEK Res Imp Prgm: Disilvestro, Donald 3.700.00 3,700.00 Page:7 apChkLst 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 8 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96876 12/29/2004 001942 S C SIGNS Nav-Dee posting public nics: Planning Sep-Oct posting public nics: Planning Sep-Oct invoice incorrectly billed 1,785.00 1,105.00 340.00 3.230.00 96877 12/29/2004 003843 SCREEN DOCTOR, THE Res Imp Prgm: Sroka, Reannette Res Imp Prgm: Mendoza, Jesus 361.96 351.00 712.96 96878 12/29/2004 008327 SEAWEST STUDIOS INC balance: construct 2 gates: C. Museu 8,828.00 8.828.00 96879 12/29/2004 007342 SHUTE, MIHALY & WE]NBERGE Nov legal services pmt 243.20 243.20 96880 12/29/2004 000645 SMART & FINAL INC supplies for Council/City Mgr meetings special event supplies: holiday lights meeting supplies for Finance 82.42 62.92 47.92 193.26 96881 12/29/2004 000537 SO CALIF EDISON Dee 2-02-351-4946 MPSC Dec 2-18-937-3152 T. Museum Dee 2-22-891-0550 Various Mtrs Dec 2-11-007-0455 6th Street Dec 2-20-817-9929 P.D. O.T. Stn Dee 2-21-911-7892 S. Side Prk Lot Dee 2-21-981-4720 Hwy 79 Dec 2-19-171-8568 Wedding Chpl Dee 2-14-204-1615 Front 8t Radio 685.78 540.77 353.76 249.66 238.46 145.91 70.01 66.15 32.02 2,382.52 96882 12/29/2004 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY Dec City facilities gas meters Dec 095-167-7907-2 Fire SIn 84 2,618.40 334.64 2,953.04 96883 12/29/2004 002503 SOUTH COAST A]R QUALITY generator operating fees: Stn 84 emissions fees: Stn 84/109664 207.82 77.25 285.07 96884 12/29/2004 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST Sep/Dec pest control svcs: CRC Dee pest control svcs: Stn 92 Dee pest control svcs: C. Museum 180.00 42.00 36.00 258.00 96885 12/29/2004 002366 STEAM SUPERIOR CARPET CL floor maint svcs @ City facilities 800.00 800.00 96886 12/29/2004 000305 TARGET STORE misc office supplies for PW dept. recreation supplies for C. Museum TCSD special events supplies TCSD special events supplies Teen Program Supplies recreation supplies for MPSC Teen Program supplies Teen Program supplies 247.71 236.89 156.D1 128.78 46.88 46.09 45.89 28.84 937.09 96887 12/29/2004 006465 TEMECULA AUTO REPAIR vehicle repair/maint svc: Fire Prey. 68.50 68.50 Page:8 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96888 12/29/2004 007929 TEMECULA POLICE EXPLORER re1reshments: Safety Expo 11/06/04 520.00 520.00 96889 12/29/2004 000307 TEMECULA TROPHY COMPAN TCSD basketball sports prgm awards 66.81 66.81 96890 12/29/2004 004274 TEMECULA VALLEY SECURITY Locksmith svcs; CRG 65.00 65.00 96891 12/29/2004 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED S Fac Rental: Public Safety Expo 11/6 840.00 Nov vehicle fuel usage:L.D.lPW Mote 435.72 Nav vehicle fuel usage: B&S dept. 212.27 Nav vehicle fuel usage: Police dept. 34.99 Nav vehicle fuel usage: PW Mote 33.87 1,556.85 96892 12/29/2004 005937 TOMCZAK, MARIA T. TCSD Instructor Earnings 40.00 40.00 96893 12/29/2004 003366 TORAN DEVELOP. & CONSTRU Reseal Boardwalk in Old Town 11,500.00 11,500.00 96894 12/29/2004 000978 TRAUMA INTERVENTION PRG 2nd Otr Emerg. Response Vol. prgm 2,181.25 2.181.25 96895 12/29/2004 005873 TRI AD ACTUARIES INC Dee Administration Fees 365.50 Credit: 41 participants for Dee -17.00 348.50 96896 12/29/2004 006192 TRISTAFF GROUP temp help PPE 12/19 Tidwell/Long 1,309.43 temp help PPE 12/05 RG/MUKT 1,009.78 temp help PPE 11/28 Tidwell/Long 791.38 temp help PPE 12/12 Tidwell 512.04 3,622.63 96897 12/29/2004 000325 UNITED WAY United Way Charities Payment 202.00 202.00 96898 12/29/2004 003497 VAIL RANCH MIDDLE SCHOOL Old Town holiday perfonnance: 12/13 150.00 150.00 96899 12/29/2004 004261 VERIZON Dee xxx.3923 Stone 28.24 28.24 96900 12/29/2004 004848 VERIZON SELECT SERVICES I Dee long distance phone svcs 1,344.34 1.344.34 96901 12/29/2004 007695 VIDO SAMARZICH INC Prgs Pmt #3: Pablo Apis Park 42.850.00 42,850.00 96902 12/29/2004 003730 WEST COAST ARBORISTS INC Nav Citywide tree stump removal svcs 495.00 495.00 96903 12/29/2004 007949 WESTERN ARTS ALLIANCE membership dues: B. BeerslOOOO86 250.00 250.00 Page:9 apChkLsI 12/29/2004 3:14:34PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 10 Bank: union UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 96904 12/29/2004 008316 WESTSIDE SELF STORAGE Off-site records storage: unit Al000 1,000.00 1,000.00 96905 12/29/2004 003932 WOODSIDE HOMES OF CALIF I Refund: permit fees:TR 29798-5 38-40 171.19 171.19 96906 12/29/2004 003434 Z E P MANUFACTURING Misc. supplies for PW Maint 239.85 239.85 Grand lolallor UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA: 487,954.85 Page:10 ITEM 4 APPROVAL ,~ CITY ATTORNEY~;?~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCE l':1// CITY MANAGER /WI' rr CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council Genie Roberts, Director of Finance p1"'" January 11, 2005 DATE: SUBJECT: City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2004 PREPARED BY: Karin Grance, Revenue Manager ffgfJ-- Shannon Domenigoni, Accountant~ That the City Council receive and file the City Treasurer's Report as of RECOMMENDATION: November 30, 2004. DISCUSSION: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of November 30, 2004. FISCAL IMPACT: None Attachments: City Treasurer's Report as of November 30, 2004 Cash Activity for the Month of Novemher: Cash and Investments as of November 1,2004 Cash Reccipts Cash Disbursements Cash and Investments as of November30, 2004 Cash aud Investments Portfolio: Type of Investment Generdl Checking Rex Bencfit Demand Deposits Checking Account- Parking Citations Local Agency Investment Fund Petty Cash Federal Agency- Callahle Federal Agency- Callable Fedeml Agency- Callable Fedcml Agency- Calluble Federal Agency- Callable Federal Agency- Callable Federal Agency- Callahle Federal Agcncy- Calh:lble Federal Agency- Callable Federal Agency- Callable Fedeml Agency- Callable Federdl Agency- Callable Bond l-<und - Cf1) B8-12 (Money Market Account) Delinquency Maintenance Account - CFD 88-12 (Invcsunent Agreement) Delinqucncy Maintenance Account - Cf1) 88-12 (Money Market Account) RcscrvePund - CFD 88-12 (Investment Agreement) Reserve Fund - CFD 88-12 (Investment Agreement) Special TaxPund - CFD 01-2 (Money Market Account) Admin Expense Fund - Cf1) 01-2 (Money Market Account) Variable Bond Fund - CFD 01-2 (Money Market Account) Interest Differential Fund - CFD 01-2 (Money Market Account) Improvement Fund - CFD 01-2 (Money Market Account) Special Tax Fund - Cf1) 03-1 (Money Market Account) Capit.allnterest Fund - em 03-} (Money Market Account) Reserve Fund - CFD 03-1 (Investment Agreement) City Improvement Fund - CFD 03-1 (Money Market Account) City Improvement Fund - CFD 03-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Cal Trans Improvement Fund - CFD 03-1 (Money Market Account) CaI Trans Improvement Fund - CFD 03-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-1 (Money Market Account) City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of November 30, 2004 Institution Union Bank Union Bank Union Bank State Treasurer-LAIF City Hall Federal Home Loan Bank Fedeml Home Loan Bank Feder:11 Home Loan Bank - BDS Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS Federal Home Loan Bank Fedeml Home Loan Bank. BDS Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS Federal Home Loan Bank - BDS Fedeml Home Loan Bank - BDS Fedeml Home Loan Bank. BDS Federal Home Loan Bank Federal Home Loan Mortgage Co U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury) CDC Funding Corp U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury) CDC Funding Corp U.S. B,nk (Fm;t Am. Treasury) u.s. Bank (First Am. Treasury) u.s. Bank (First Am. Treasury) U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) U.S. Bank: (First Am Treasury) U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Aig Match Fed Corp Ref U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) State Treasurer-LAlF U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury) State Treasurer-LAIF u.s. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Yield nt, n/. nt, 2.003 % nt, 1.885 % 2.500 % 3.000 % 3.000 % 3.000 % 3.070 % 3.100 % 3.125 % 3.150 % 3.520 % 2.250 % 2.000 % 1.120 % 5.430 % 1.120 % 5.430 % 1.100 % 1.120 % 1.120 % 1.120 % 1.120 % 1.120 % 1.120 % 1.110% 4.830 % 1.120 % 2.003 % 1.120 % 2.003 % 1.120 % Page 1 $ 126,140,792 4.093.133 (4.650.530) $ 125.583,395 Maturityl Purchase Tennination Market Par/Book Date Date Value Balance @ 11130/04 762.452 (I) 9,635 (I) 4,018 57,608,112 (2) $ 1.500 6n6/2003 1123/2006 988.130 987.500 7/16/2003 8/14/2006 1.979.380 1,975.620 4n/2004 In/2008 2.878,837 2,852.894 4122/2004 1122/2008 1.966,260 1.951.260 3/29/2004 12/28/2007 3,936.240 3.907.520 4/15/2004 1/15/2008 1.970.620 1,956.880 4/8/2004 1/8/2008 3,008,063 2.988.054 4/16/2004 1/16/2008 986,880 980.000 4/14/2004 1/14/2008 987.500 980.940 4130/2004 1130/2008 1.993.120 1.983.760 6/26/2003 7/24/2006 986.250 983,750 6/6/2003 6/30/2006 983.480 979,800 56.247 9/1/2017 500,000 535,560 9/1/2017 1,531,469 9 561,065 644.613 7.569 131,728 3,550,79g 18.549 32 863,900 170,613 1.235.785 1,119 1.010.882 1.332 Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-1 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Capital Interest Fund - CFD 03-3 (Money Market Account) Capital Interest Fund - Cf1) 03-3 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Resenre Fund - CFD 03-3 (Investment Agreement) Resenre Fund - OU 03-3 (Money Market Account) City Improvement Fund - crn 03-3 (Money Market Account) City Improvement Fund - Cffi 03-3 (Local Agency Investment Fund) EMWD Improvement Fund - Cl-<U 03-3 (Money Market Account) EMWD Improvement Fund - CFD 03-3 (Local Agency Investment Fund) Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-3 (Money Market Account) Acquisition Account Fund - CFD 03-3 (Local Agency Investmcnt Fund) Capital Inten~<;t Fund - CFD 03-06 (Moncy Market Account) Rcscnrc Fund - CFD 03-06 (Money Market Account) City Improvement Fund. CFD 03-06 (Money Market Account) Cost ofIssuancc Fund - CPO 03-06 (Money Market Account) Redemption Fund - AD 03.04 (Money Market Account) Admin Ex.pense Fund - AD 034 (Money Market Account) Resenre Fund - AD 03-04 (Money Market Account) Interest Account - RDA TABs (Money Market Account) Reserve Account - RDA TABs (SUrelY Bond) Project Account - RDA TABs (Money Market Account) Project Aceount-RDA TABs (Local Agency Investment Fund) Installment Payment f"'Und - TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Project Fund - TCSD COPs (Money Market Account) Project Fund. TCSD COPs (Local Agency Investment Fund) City of Temecula City Treasurer's Report As of November 30, 2004 State Treasurer-LAIP 2.003 % U.S. Bank (FJISl Am Treasury) Ll20 % State Treasurer-LAIF 2.003 % Cdc Funding Corp 3.000 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) LI20 % U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury) Ll20 % State Treasurer-LAIF 2.003 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Ll20 % State Treasurer-LAIF 2.003 % U.S. Bank (FJISl Am Treasury) Ll20 % State Treasurer-LAIF 2.003 % U.S. Bank (Fust Am. T=sury) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (FJISl Am Treasury) Ll20 % US. Bank (Frrst Am. Treasury) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasnry) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (FlfSt Am Treasury) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Tcc.asury) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Tre.1sury) 1.120 % U.S. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Ll20 % US. Bank (First Am. Treasury) nta US. Bank (FJISl Am Treasury) 1.l20 % State Treasurer-LAIF 2.003 % US. Bank (First Am. Treasury) Ll20 % U.S. Bank (First Am Treasury) LI20 % State Treasurer-LAlF 2.003 % (I)-This alllount is net of outstanding checks. (2)-At November 30,2004 total market value (including accrued interest) for the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) was $51 ,500,151 ,707. TIIC City's proportianate share of that valuc is $57,535,343. All investments are liquid and currently available. The City ofTemecula's portfolio is in compliance with the investment policy. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six. months. Page 2 1,293,186 4.492 2.441 2,171.120 11,588 1.242 7.460.619 2,959 3,657.449 9,974 9.992.780 245.389 338,398 3,831,381 21.482 8,103 370 100,151 81 504 2.714,585 264 868 1.979.002 $ 125,583.395 001 100 101 120 150 160 165 170 190 192 193 194 195 210 261 271 273 274 275 276 280 300 310 320 330 340 380 390 460 470 471 473 474 475 476 CITY OF TEMECULA CASH AND INVESTMENT REPORT NOVEMBER 2004 GENERAL FUND STATE GAS TAX FUND STATE TRANSPORTATION FUND DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND AB 2766 FUND AB 3229 COPS RDA DEV LOW/MOD 20% SET ASIDE MEASURE A FUND TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS TCSD SERVICE LEVEL"C" LANDSCAPE/SLOPE TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSElRECYCLING TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREETIROAD MAINT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND CFD 88-12 ADMIN EXPENSE FUND CFD 01-2 HARVESTON IMPROVEMENT FUND CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL IMPROVEMENT FUND AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER IMPROVEMENT FUND CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 IMPROVEMENT FUND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - CIP PROJECT INSURANCE FUND VEIDCLES FUND INFORMATION SYSTEMS SUPPORT SERVICES FACILITIES RDA 2002 TABS DEBT SERVICE TCSD 2001 COP'S DEBT SERVICE CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 01-2 HARVESTON DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 98-1 WINCHESTER HILLS DEB SERVICE CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND GRAND TOTAL Fund Total 18,567,740.27 250,015.12 1,381.48 13,106,467.75 164,232.37 113,790.00 7,907,255.43 4,930,380.56 138,622.53 16,544.13 58,218.62 73,254.35 29,045.07 29,426,160.70 7,975.38 3,546,868.80 3,712,917.60 102,953.74 21,125,023.82 3,831,380.93 5,216,538.74 1,517,134.79 164,752.01 703,453.12 190,766.83 97,043.14 1,708,028.04 132,161.1 5 2,756,303.77 2,010,151.39 11 ,598.31 943,050.64 124,139.52 2,262,754.67 635,290.06 125,583,394.83 ITEM 5 APPROVAL ,L) CITY ATTORNEY CftJ;?~ DIR.OF FINANCE ~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Genie Roberts, Director of Finance DATE: January 11,2005 SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant Application Proposals for FY 2005/06 PREPARED BY: Gus Papagolos, Fiscal Services Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funding recommendation from the Finance Committee and staff. 2. Authorize the Director of Finance to execute Sub-Recipient Agreements and to reprogram CDBG funds in accordance with the current budget resolution for general administration of the Fiscal Year 2005-06 Community Development Block Grant Funds. DISCUSSION: The CDBG program is a federal grant program administered by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in which funding is allocated to the City annually through the Economic Development Agency (EDA) of Riverside County. The application requests were reviewed for eligibility for CDBG funding by our program representative at the EDA and all of the applications are eligible for funding. In order for a project to be considered for funding, it must meet one of the following national goals: 1. The activity benefits 51 percent low/moderate income persons; or, 2. The activity aids in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or, 3. The activity meets an emergent community development need. A total often (10) applications were submitted to the City for consideration and all were determined to be eligible for CDBG funding. The City's allocation for FY 05/06 is anticipated to be $481 ,825. CDBG regulations impose a 15 percent cap from the total allocation for Public Services. The Finance Committee is recommending a total expenditure of $72,273 for Public Services, which is within the 15% cap and the balance of $409,552 is for public facilities and capital improvement projects (refer to the table on the foliowing page). FY 05/06 CDBG ALLOCATION FUNDING CATEGORY FUNDING ALLOCATION 2005-06 CDBG Allocation - estimate $481,825 Less Public Services (15% CAP) -72,273 Project Funding available for Public Facilities/Infrastructure $409,552 Due to the possibility that the City's allocation may be reduced, it is recommended that all projects be reduced equally, according to the percentage in allocation reduction. All projects are subject to final approval at a future Riverside County Board of Supervisors meeting. The EDA will submit a supplemental agreement to the City identifying the projects approved for funding in June 2004. Also, for general information this FY 2005/2006 CDBG funding cycle begins the second year of a three-year cooperation agreement with the County EDA. At the term of this agreement the City will review the benefits for application of entitlement status with HUD. The Finance Committee composed of Mayor Mike Naggar, and Councilmember Jeff Stone, met on December 14, 2004 and after thorough review, are proposing CDBG funding for ten (10) public service organizations and two (2) City capital projects as described in the attachment. FISCAL IMPACT: The CDBG funds allocated to outside agencies have no impact on the City, other than staff time needed to administer program requirements. Attachments: 1. Finance Committee Recommendations 2. FY 05/06 CDBG Applications Funding Summary FINANCE COMMITTEE FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS Alternatives to Domestic Violence $10,000 $69,222 $10,000 (ADV) Operation School Bell 14,000 15,000 11,000 Boys & Girls Club of Temecula 11,000 30,000 11,000 Court Appointed Special 2,000 10,500 2,000 Advocates Rape Crisis Center 4,000 5,000 4,000 Safe Alternative For Everyone 5,000 10,000 8,000 Emergency Food Aid 10,000 10,000 10,000 Circle of Care 7,000 46,200 7,500 YMCA 7,500 10,000 4,773 American Red Cross 0 20,000 4,000 Total Public Services Projects $70.500 $225.922 $72 273 115% Cap = $72,273) Prior Year Public Services Award Funding Requested Finance Committee Funding Recommendation Non-Public Service Projects Prior Year City Facility Award Funding Requested Finance Committee Funding Recommendation Old Town Gym $203,332 $216,500 $216,500 Temecula Community Center 206,730 216,500 216,500 Expansion $410.062 $433.000 $433.000 Total Non-Public Service Grand Total $478.426 $658.922 $505 273 (Total Projected CDBG Allocation = $433,000 City of Temecula FY 05/06 CDBG Applications Funding Summary FUNDING QUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY REQUEST CRITERIA Alternatives to Alternatives to Public Servicel Provide 24-hour crisis Domestic Violence Domestic $69,222 Limited Clientele intervention, advocacy Violence services, shelter, community education and the Children's Support Program. Operation School Asst. League of Public Service/ Provide clothing to children Bell Temecula $15,000 Low-Mod Income identified by TVUSD in need of Valley clothing. Boys & Girls Club of Boys & Girls Public Servicel Scholarship program for low- Temecula Club of $30,000 Low-Mod Income income families to participate Temecula in AM/PM Camp activities & transportation. Court Appointed Court Public Service/ CASA trains community Special Advocates Appointed $10,500 Low-Mod Income volunteers to serve as court of Riverside County Special advocates for Advocates of abused/neglected children Riverside who have been removed from County (CASA) their homes in order to ensure the child's safety. Riverside County Local Rape Public Service/ This program provides Rape Crisis Center Crisis Center $5,000 Low-Mod Income assistance to victims of sexual assault in the Temecula area at Rancho Springs Medical Center. Safe Alternatives for Safe Public Servicel Provide services for children, Everyone Alternatives for $10,000 Low-Mod Income youth and families who have Everyone experienced or are at risk of (SAFE) abuse and violence. Emergency Food & Temecula Public Servicel Provide emergency food Aid Senior Center $10,000 Limited Clientele distribution and limited utility assistance to households based on referrals from Social Services and local churches. Circle of Care Vineyard of the $46,200 Public Service/ Provide emergency food New Wine Low-Mod Income distribution and resource center assistance (clothing & house hold items) based on referrals and a walk-in basis. 1 , City of Temecula FY 05/06 CDBG Applications Funding Summary \ APPLICATION TITLE AGENCY FUNDING QUALIFYING PROJECT SUMMARY REQUEST CRITERIA YMCA YMCA Public Service/ This program will provide $10,000 Low-Mod Income scholarships to day camp for under privileged children at Temecula Elementary School. American Red Cross Temecula $20,000 Public Servicel Emergency services for low Low-Mod Income and moderately low income persons Subtotal Public . $225.922 Services . . Old Town Temecula Temecula $216,500 Design and construct an Gymnasium Community Public Facility indoor Gymnasium in Old Services Town with approx 6,800 sq ft District and spectator seating. The , City will partner with the Temecula Boys & Girls Club on this proiect. Temecula Temecula Community Center Community $216,500 Public Facility This project will include an Expansion Services expansion of 2,800 square District feet and add an office and meeting area to the TCC facility. Subtotal Facilityl $433.000 Infrastructure : TOTAL FUNDING REQUESTED $658.922 2 ITEM 6 APPROVAL;) CITY ATTORNEY ~rrl DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: City Manager/City Council -yJ~ William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer . January 11, 2005 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Parcel Map No. 31751 located on the southeast side of County Center Drive, approximately eight hundred and fifty (850) feet east of Ynez Road . PREPARED BY: {/f Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~ Kendra Hannah, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve: 1) Parcel Map No. 31751 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Monument Bond as security for the agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 31751 is a Parcel Map with two (2) commercial parcels located on the southeast side of County Center Drive, approximately eight hundred and fifty (850) feet east of Ynez Road. All Street improvements have been completed on County Center Drive. On August 12, 2004, the City of Temecula Planning Director approved Tentative Parcel Map 31751, with the appropriate Conditions of Approval. The Developer, Temecula Highlands, LLC, A California Limited Liability Company has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This final map is in conformance with the approved tentative parcel map. The approval of a final subdivision map, which substantially complies with the approved tentative map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State law. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fees & Securities Report for Parcel Map No. 31751 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Parcel Map No. 31751 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\200510111 051PM 31751.doc CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO. PM 31751 Staff reviewed the following fees relative to their applicability to this project. FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Flood Control (ADP) Paid. This fee is due prior to issuance of a grading permit. Development Impact Fee Not Paid. This fee will be collected prior to issuance of building permits. 2 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\200510111051PM 31751.doc CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT PARCEL MAP NO. 31751 DATE: JanuaN11,2005 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 Monumentation $ 1,400.00 - DEVELOPMENT FEES RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ Paid Development Impact Fee $ *TBD SERVICE FEES Planning Fee $ 291.00 Fire Fee $ 206.00 TCSD Fee $ 141.00 Plan Check Fee $ 1907.00 Monument Inspection Fee $ 274.00 Fees Paid to Date $ 2819.00 Balance of Fees Due $ 0.00 ''To Be Determined 3 R:\AGENOA REPORTS\200510111051PM 31751.doc VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE \ ~ ....... .-('\ ~ 'b ,;.t- >L @ ~ Q? 0" Q::' ~ ~ /--10 / ,(.-\ ~ ~<v ~ *-~ ~~~ SITE TEMECULA HIGHLANDS COUNTY CENTER DRIVE ~ lli ~ '" ~ 1 ~c ~ ~~"j I ~~~~ . I ~eiiS~ ~...!!lO I <roFfj I ~~~~ 7~X!n I 8l:;"'z \21!~: 'i . ,,,_ ~ a \ ~;,;~~ ~~~! .! ~~~~11 ~I~:f I I:, \ '5"~0 ill ~'" 0 Sll.~8~ ~ ~~ \ ,\ ~~~~~ ~<~- \ . \ 8 ____, 55u~ \ . \ I ;~~~ \ .\ 1----- I ~~8N \ If< \ r- Ii I -~". \. "'0'" 0 ~S~. \. \ 'i\~ -. {'>!"~111' -b~" \ '" .. 10 !:l... ~ So _l -' ~ ~,,~. \~", ~ PAR' 0 J___ 05.,,~ 'os'w """_.".. . "zoo w.... =-000,", , f 'V/ \ ------TH..,,'OSW 7 " ~i ~ ~llI\/f \ '~~~ PAR' 3 ~ )0"-':>::01 \l.~')..~" \ \\ ~'.;:;, f ~ "'?:;'W??~("N"'~ /(;'i'> \'0:..J ~_ ""'!~~i!l~~~;;:~M~~", ~';j \. [NI50'55'JTw 618..5e'} Ii ____-........ ~ ~ ~M~....r...~1ilR~...;n;n '6 'a \ 1518.57 :::, '" ":::";;h,,~~~~ -. -. \ ..,',,',rw ' ~;;i!:: a>... "'ClINZ Z'"'''' ::):::;j 0'" z Z'" .J.J 1_-- "" i ,,0"" ~---- \ \ ~~ ~"NM"'~I~~~~;~~ ~~ " :l""""! I \ " ~ "" ei I ~I&" ~ ';i fi 8 ill *~ B~ ~ G , .. _, ~~ 8 ~ : =- B! II, I I '" 1 ~~I"(..~ ; ~~ / €i ~ ~ ~ (...to~-_J'''''''' ~ ~ ~:E:(1?)}-.";"' <1<1 C'v .:!;.."/ 8/~i;' "0 "f; E; / 51 'f:) .. N4e'tlJ'~20I1' .... /8 ,- ii;;r!:i [N4e'tlJ"20IV 54".50' f::: i, III "/," '<"OJ ~ <lJ/lt"<l:/" ;;:: 'ii/ ~ I 8. f" ~. Q / Iii ~ il;l 1 I', '-' . ~ / .~.~ /l.< ","" ~~*ll <:., /~~." ~ ~l. , ^?^'" I,~,! ~ i ',., , /.... <V i ~~~~ r, ~ ..' . EJ ""~., Q: '". ~ l 0': ~ " ~~ ~g ~ li:~ S!~ ~~ C\,j ::l !;;'wQ "'..: z ::l h l "'-Pi ,,:.:ti g ~1l1 ;:::tl", !J.J ~ ~.--:@ ~i6 &:ltl~ '" ....~ lJj~~ IJj ti:~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ lil~~ :t ~" i;~ ~>r- ~i!~ ~g ~~ .~~ CI) on 1ra..f a. -< Z < I..~ :I:ZW ::OS! E[ UJ Nfl'i aOO<...",... lfIa;:l. -"; ~i3.......lr 1::%00 ~~;;6 ~um ><~ ~...'" :...", ~~!i a~ gi1", :::.. ~fl ~a;~ ClE~ ~~~~:lI ~~a ~~~ r'lll. ~;::;~ ~<'l~ 0::i:J~ li;!ll. ti0::8 i~1= ~~ ~~ll e~f ~~~.~ .~~ ~.g f'l:.i '" I ~8"'....~ <(<'l <(:::Ii I F:::Ii ~~ 86m ~:.:~ S}~1:.'j ~S; Mg! i!'~~ ~c: a~~ ~~~ ~~E ~:II ~o_ ~~::l zi ~~_ _ ~~... - I ,~" o. . ~~~ " :'!; ~ f2 ::J ('j ~ ~ 1! '" ~~~ts Ck:~"'C a':~~~ ~~U)1E ~",o ~~~~ Q~n::Q::: "ii:",-~ "" "''' ~lt.._:':) Cl Cl L<i ~~iS'-' S,l ;;:; tJ '" 0 '" lQ t--..: O:::::::i co ~ ~ ....... ~8~lJ.. Q: ("") L... ~C:l a "- Cl... C);S l'j '" o ::;; "GQ:~ ~ < g\;l8~ ~ ~ ~~fgLu 8 ~ Q." 0. i!= "'-J '<CC:i~ :'i c.:: "-~Q:~ :::, ~ 0"",,,,. ~ Q.; "", 0. Q. ~ Q;:tVJ~ !-U Vlt-::'<( .--. :s "- iS~"cj)..: a en ~~I- :::. ~ Q::; ...... <: V)(Qp~:::. "'- 0 '<l:;~::JlJ..<...> \2 ('joC) -Q. .- G:i~L....O:",( co:::E OO'l V) ~ G !j! " ~ PAR . . o d. Q 8e 3 ~i I I I~ I'~ ~i "0 .' $~ ..~ ! ~ ~!] "'Iii " :.l ;> "" ~ ~8 ,..., 88 .. I U HH ~~ . ~ I " " w '. fi.1i '. ::all . Ii , ", "'-- "" .. " <>::. " >!' " ~~ CO ., ;::~ Ii o [N41J'OtJ'Jeir N~nlJ'Jp.1Y (1?)} "--..---_.!It) --;-.:..., /""!'l N~!?s/f! ...~~r;IR " "," /"" :!..!!..:::<I<l:..:/..... ~ .b8. ~g~ oHfi '" ", i~ < i! 3 d 3 .t~." ~ " .....,.(~e-~. . " , i .........,"\~"" ~ '..:.,~.y)J ~ ", . - ;;J ~ ~d ~~~: . ~.... ~~ ." ;~ '.~ ~j~ oa~ nj~ U"_ ~.~ :~~ "O~ Ii ' "~ ~~. Vl~~ ~<o uo~ ~~~ ~' 0 l'Z ~.~~ ~G ""c.;r5 i':i!~ ", " '" ,;. .' j,.:; ,,:; , ^ , , .:! ----- ITEM 7 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY --t:rJ/1 DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: City Manager/City Council ~1 William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 2005 Parcel Map No. 31724, Located South of Overland Drive, EastofYnez Road, West of Margarita Road, Being a subdivision of parcel 1 as shown by tract map 30107. TO: DATE: SUBJECT: PREPARED BY: fflRonald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works Chris White, Assistant Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve 1) Parcel Map No. 31724 in conformance with the Conditions of Approval 2.) Subdivision Monument Agreement and accept the Certificate of Deposit for Monuments as security for the agreements. BACKGROUND: Parcel Map No. 31724 is located within Parcel Map 30107, Parcel Map No. 31724 is subject to all underlying conditions of approvals. Parcel Map No. 31724 is a Parcel with three (3) lot commercial parcels. The parcel is located South of Overland Drive, West of Margarita Road and East of Ynez Road. The site is currently being constructed for commercial/retail purposes. The owners of the property is: Overland Land & Cattle Company, A California Limited Liability Company has met all of the Conditions of Approval. This Parcel Map is in conformance with the approved tentative parcel map. The approval of a final parcel map, which substantially complies with the approved parcel map, is a mandatory ministerial act under State Law. The following fees have been deferred for Parcel Map No. 31724: Development Impact Fee due prior to issuance of building permit. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. Development Fee Checklist 2. Fee & Security Report 3. Project Vicinity Map 4. Parcel Map No. 31724 r:\a9drptI04/tm29798,-1,-2.,map CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT FEE CHECKLIST CASE NO, PM 31724 The following fees were reviewed by Staff relative to their applicability to this project. FEE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Flood Control (ADP) N/A Quimby Fees N/A Development Impact Fee To be paid prior to issuance of a building permit 2 r:\aQdrptI04/tm2Q7Q8..1,-2,.map CITY OF TEMECULA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FEES AND SECURITIES REPORT Parcel MAP NO. 31724 DATE: Januarv11,2005 IMPROVEMENTS FAITHFUL PERFORMANCE MATERIAL & LABOR SECURITY SECURITY Street and Drainage $ 0 $ 0 Water $ 0 $ 0 Sewer $ 0 $ 0 TOTAL $ 0 $ 0 Monument $ 2,000 - DEVELOPMENT FEES City Traffic Signing and Striping Costs $ 0.00 RCFCD (ADP) Fee $ N/A Development Impact Fee $ 0.00 SERVICE FEES Planning Fee $ 58.00 Comprehensive Transportation Plan $ 4.00 Plan Check Fee $ 830.00 Monument Inspection Fee $ 250.00 Fees Paid to Date $ 1,058.00 Balance of Fees Due $ 84.00 I 3 r:lagdrptI04/tm29798,-1. ,2.,map ,,~,y SCALE'-=60' ,~~ ~~~.1~ AC PJtRCEIi.M~P31724 GROSS ACREACE=5.19 AC IN THE CiTY Of 1EMECULA, COUNTY Of RIVERSlOE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA BEING A'SUBDIVlSlON Of PARCEL 1 OF PARCEl )lAP 30107 AS SHOVIN ON A MAP RECORDED 'IN BOOK 204 OF PARCELMAPS,-,'PAGES60 THROUGH 64, INCLUSIVE, . 'RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE. COUNTY, STAlE,OF CALIFORNIA. ,'. '.-; DEHNlSC. fARNSWORTH, R.C.E. 31653 ;,AJL Y 2003 .' DWIt/F11'S'iTATFIIF.NT JJF H€RE8'1 SrATe YE'ARC THE ottNERS OF mE LAND /NCLl/OEJ),MTHIN THE SlJ81)IIIfSKJN . SHO'ftN.'HE:RffJN: ,THAT /IE HE lJE lMY PERSONS,IIfHOSf:,CONSENT IS NliCESSAfrY TO PASS.A ClEAR,71M TO s.t4l LAND; THAT K CONSENT TO'f1(E ill"A~ AMO RE'(:(JRf)II{(; , OF THIS SI/BOMS/ON AlAP AS SHOIW M7H/N THE /JISTfNC11.1.C fJOIWffi LINE. lIE' HEREBY DEDIc.-. If" AavT1ERS Rf(;HTS OF Aca:ss ALONG OYmtAND lJRIlIt: AND mEZ RtAI.f) 1V THE PU8UC. THE OJlNERS OF PARCC/.S t 'THROUGH J, A8V17JNG THeSE HGHWA ~ i4N() DURING SUCH 17ME: JlILL HA\IC NO '"GIfTS OF ACtUS E~T M:GENERAL EASDIENT OF 71i'AI-fi; ALSO EXCEPTING 7JIO ADJACENT rHIIlTY FOOT OPENINGS, ONE F:ACH, f"ORPARCELS NtlM/JER r AN/) N!JM89 J, AND PARt."D..S NWBER 2 AHIJ NIJM8ER .:t ~S SHOItN Hef(EC#I. ANY,CHAJiIGE OF ~UGNMOIT OR MQ1H'7H~TKESVLrs IN-TH!: ~Gl'l",W THERF:OF.SHAl.L lER1tIINA~7fflSDaJJCI4I1ONASroTHE:PARrVACAlCO. IIf'RETAIN UNro 0URSa~ ()(.JR HfIRS AN[) ASS1aNrrs.' THE:,RB:IPROCAL ACCE:SS EASa/VlT FOR INCRESS ECI?<SS SHOW; ON THE: lIAP HERETJN OlE'R PAHCaS I~. AND .1 FOR THE BENEFTT OF PARCELS r. 2 AN/) 3- JlI: ALSO HelEBY Rt:TAIN UNTO OURSIlI.lo!'S: OUR HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, THE PRi't'A rt: S!1lE1i' EASEMENT O~ PMCEL I FOR JHF: BENEFIT OF PMCn 2 AND 71-fC PRiVArt: Sl1lEJi' EASDlENT O;e;' PARCElS I AND 2 FOR THF: S€NUIT or IWlCEL .J. O~ANO LAND ~ CAme GU. A, CAI.1FIJIfNJA l.II/ITED UABlUTY COMPANY .JAMES C H1/N!)!EY, MANAGING UD/BER RFNFFlC/AHY TEllECiJlA VAlLEY BANK. No'" 8ENEFICI~RY I.INOER f)a:t) OF TR/JST ~lJE() JlJN< '&; 2tXD. AS INSTRI.iItIENT NO. 2O()J-41J076. O(F'1CTA[ RECORDS OF m'tERSJOE COI/NTY. STArt: OF CAUFOIfNIA. '"'' NtJTARY AfYt'N(JIM~T STATFOF'CALJFOIfNIAk COUNTY OF ) ON BEFaiiEIJE. f'ffiSONA1LY APPEAREl) JAMES E. HIINDlEY. PF:RSONALL Y.KNOIIIN TO liE (Off PROW TO liE ON THe BASlSOFSA71SFACTORY ElifDENCI) ro BE THE PERSON /tHOSE NAM€ IS SlIIJSCIlIBBJ IV THE WITHIN INS1F?IJAI€NT AND ACKNOIItIBJCED. IV ME THAT HEDtECUlCO THE SAlK IN HiS AI/1Hamm ~PAaTY. ANlJ THATBYH/SSlCNAnJRE ON THEINS1lWJrIENT 7HE PmSON, OR THe EN71TY /JPON BOfAiF OF IfMCH 11ft; PERSON ACrm. EXECl/1EO rwF: INS1RI.IMENr. ItITN€SS IIYHAN/): MY C()MI.IISS/ON EXP/IiES NOTARY PI/BLlC IN ANlJ FOR SAID STArt: MY PRINCIPII! RAat OF evS/NESS IS IN "''''''''''' """'" NDTARY AfYfNDWI~T STArt: OFCAUFORNI...} r COON'" OF ON BEFDR<ME; PERSONALLY APF'F:A/f€/) PE'RSONALLY KNOIW TO ME (OR F>ROW;D IV liE ON THE fJAS/S OF SAi1S1'ACn:ll\'Y EVlDCNCE) TO BE 11-IE PERSON(S) WfI()!1E NAME(S) IS/ARE StlBSCffJ/E{) TO THE WITHIN INS'fR!AlOIT AND A~ 1lJ ME THAT H€/SHF:/lHa EXEaJ1ED THE' SWE IN HfS/HBf/1HBR A1/1HORfZ8J CAP/IIGYTY(IE5.t AN!) 7HAT BY HfS/'HER/1H8R SlGNA1lJR€(S) ON lHE,fNSlRIJM€NT lHE PCR$aN{S.t OR THE EN71TY //PON BD-fAIf OF'.WI1ICH me PERSON(S} AC/!'ZI, EXEC111ED 1IIE INSrRllMWr. ffl1/iIESS 11'1' HAND: MY COMIIIJSSION E:XPfRE:!' NOTARY PUBUC IN AND FOR S4/O STA TF: MY PRINCIPAL PLA~ OF 8IJS/NESS IS IN """""" """'" 'i1CNA7UHF"~ PlJRSUANT TO SCC71C#1 -6UJ6 (eXI) OF THE Sl.JiW/lIIS/ON 1rI/JP ACT; THE SIGNA nJRF:S.OF THE FOLLOIt1NC OIllNO?S OF EASEllF:N1S AND OR OTHER /N1ER€STS HA IoF BEEN OUITTrn. 1HelR INTEREST BEING.SlJCH THAT IT CANNOT RIPEN INTO A F€€.' 1. lHE COUNTY OF R/;e;'SJ<< HOU'J€R IfCrJ)$ OF AN EASEMO<T FOR Sl.~ &SDIENTS RECORDED ON I4PRIL ~ .,9fi6 AS INS1'RfJN!NTNO. :170S1, Cf'F1C1AL MCORbS. NOT PLOTTABU: PER REctJRI}$. 2. THe cotINTY. OF RI'lERSIO€ Ha.lX8 OF 1W EAS€/iENT FOR PU8iIC 1/71UTY f't.mPOSES AS SHOWN 8'1' ~ TRACT MAP 3.JJ0I- ON f1lE IN,fJOOt( 54, PACES 25 7HROUCH:JO OF UAPS; IN THE CQl/NTy OF Rfv&Slt)f; ffECORfJ&. .1 S{)iJTHERN Gl'll/FCRM... EVlSON COAIPNoIY AND G'F:NFRAL TElEPHONE CalPANY OF C/lllFCIffNf'" HOWER OF AN EASEMENT FOR P/J8L1C.1/71l./TY PIJRf'OSES RECORDlif) ON fF8RUARY 4, 1970 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 172.J2.0FFlCIA1. RECORDS. SHEIl I OF 2 SHEETS ~~STA'1FVFNT mro1H!S_()AYOF~2fXU AT _ _.AI" IN 800K ~ or PARCa J.lq<S.ATPAGES~AT1HE RirOUEST OF THE: aD?/( OF THE CITY OF rt:MECI/LA NO ""I GotIi'Yt.. ORSl:l, cotlNTYASSES:.S'CW Q.ERK-- B" ~ l:T..7FUFNT SIJBl>>I<fS/ON (;IJARAN1CF 8~ CHICAGO mzr COMPANY THIS /tIAP WAS PflCPAREf},llY lIE OR iINDER MY SlIPERWSION AND IS BA.s:ro ON A F1EW SU'i'~ IN ~ tl/7HifHE_RefJfJIREMENTS OF THE SlJB()IVlSION /JAP ACT AND LOCAL ORDINANcE AT mE REOUES7' OF DAVCON DE'tf:I.DPIIIe/T ON JUNE /2. "'"' ' I HEREBY STA TE: THA T AU MONIIJ.IE1flS AHE or THE: CHARACTER AND OCCUPY' THE' PQSIllONS INOICA7FD, OR IfIU BE SET IN ACCORDANCE "'11/ 71tE TERMS OF THE MONt.J/fIENT AGRffMENT f'(M THE MAP; AND fHAT ~fllltlONllltft:NlS ARE SfJFF/QENT TO ENA8t.E, THE: SURl>FY TO tr Rf:WACET). I HERBJY STArE THAT THIS PARCEL MAP SV8STANTlAUY CDNF'ORJ.IS TO 1HE APPROIlt:D OR CClNOITlQNAUY APPROW TQlTAn!>F MAP. IFANY. ()AT~: II/#"""': t)~ . c:.~ DENNIS G:. FARNSWORTH, uc. EXP. 12/:11/04 ~/ "" en.", CITY,~ o;'TAT1'JIfflr I HEREBY ST~TE: THAT THIS MAP. CONS/STINe OF ~ (2) SHEErs. HAS BEE'N EXANlNCD BY ME OR. /.WDERMY SVPa?I<fS/ON NolO FfJlJN/) TO BE SV8STANTlALLY THE ~IK AS IT APPEARED ON ;HE TENTA 711'f' MAP OF TRACT /tIAP 317201- AS FlLFtJ AND APPROI1f:D BY rHE CITY OF 7r:MJ:ctJlA oN FF8RUA1{i 14 2004. THE €XP/RA"fltJN a'irE BEJNC FEBRtJARy 1/1, 2006. THAT ALL PRO\I1S/ONS OF APPLIC.A8I.E STATE LAW AND ClTr' RCCULA71CWS HAI1f: BEEN COUPUm MTH, ~NIJ THAT I All SA71SF1ED THIS IllAPIS 1'ECf/NI(;MLYCORRECT. R<:iNAlD,J. PARKS, RCE/97# DESlGNA TFl) AC71NC ClTr' ENGINEER . CITY OF IntE'ClIlA EXPlRA710N CATE: 9j)O~ CITY r.J nw-'<: ('7" TRIFNT THE CITY (;(JIJNCfl. OF THE CITY or 1l)(!"CIIl.A, STATE OF CAJ.JFORNIA, BY ITS CITY CLERK. SI.I~N 1f..JONES, CMC. HFRaJY APPROV€S 1HE PARGU MAP. """" CITY CLERK, OTYOF TF:MEctJlA Sl.lSAN II! ~ CMC TAl'lIDND,f:FR71F1CA7F" I HE1?E1JY C!lrT1FY THAT A lJONl) IN 11fE'SUM or HAS BFEN EXCCI/TFD AND RUJ) "'711 THE 8I>>.RD OF SUPCRI1SOHS OF THE COUNTY OF RI'r'ERSIDF:, CALIFORNIA. CWOlTlONED /JPON THE: PA '/'MEWT OF AlL T..uF~ STA IF, COUNTY. MUNICIPAL OR LOCAL. AND All SP(CIAL ASSESS1ENTS COl.UCTEI' AS TAXE:'t 'ItH1CH A T THE 1IUE: OF 7HE:F1lJNC OF 1HlS MAP II1TH THE COIJNTYRECOIltJER AIiE A /JFN AGAINST SAID PfWPFRTY, SUT NCT l'U PA rAULE" AND SAIO BON/) HAS BEEN lNI/. Y APPROvm BY SAI/) BOARD OF 5t1P€R\IISORS . OAW: CASH TAXlJON(J PAf)l Mt:DONNn1. COUNTY TAX C011.ECTOR NANCY I?OMB?O Ct.E1/f( "' THE" BOARO or SUPERI1SORS " -'" TA.YtYJ//~TnI1"!;;f'$II~7F" I HF:HEBY a:R71FY THAT ACIXBDING ro THE: ReCORDS OF THIS 0f'F1CE, AS OF THIS OAT!: 1HFRE ARE NO lKNS ACNNST THE REAL PROPF:RTY SHOlIIN ON THE 1t11HlN MN' FOR /.JNPA/l! ST~lE,.COtJNTY.Itll.lNlC/PA1 OR LOCAL T~ M SPECIAl ASSESSMENTS caLEC1W AS TA.I(!:S f:XCEPT T~ OR SPE'ClAL ~SSl:SSUEN1S COLlECTED AS TAXES NOW A Uf:N Bl/T NOT rETPAYABLE, IfH1C/1AftEES11UATED TO BE ,------. 0A1ED: PAUL ftIdJONNEU. . COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR '" -'" 5<C_ r. R. .JW , 1 SCALE '-=60' NO. Of' ,PARCElS 3 NET Aa:tEAGE-5.19 AC GROSS A~EAGE-5.19 AC PARCEL MAP 31724 SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS " IN THE ClTY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RI'<8<SIDE. STATE OF CAUFORNIA BEING.ASUSDlVlSION QFPARCEL 1 OF PARCEL'MAP 30107 -AS SHO'Mll ON A MAP I RECORDED IN. BOOK 204 OF PARCElMAPS,PAGES.60 lHROUGH 6., INQ.US11JE. , RECORDS OF R1VERSlOECOUNlY. STAlE OfCAUFORNIA. DENNIS C. FARNSWORTH, R.c.E. 31653 JULY 2003 I I D...Cft'tJI"RF~ ~"!;NO~ SCALE.: 1--60' lJCAI1N(;S ARC BASED lIF'ON THE CEHmttNE OF' O~M' 011111(" BE1NG NIJ5"2'<<JY PET?PARCn IiIAP:ro107 AS $HOIfN (If MAPOfI RJ..E IN 800K ~,orPMCEI.. UAPs, PACCSS~64. fWCLU$l1tE Rn;ORf)SfYf?lVV?SIOCCO/JNrr;~. FNlAR'nNUFNTAI IJt'1N'I:7RANT NfJ'f'Ih 1110 ENWfONll/OirAJ, catSITfAIIT SlaT AFfCC11N(; I ~~;:~~~c:o:;~ PAct:......... rHlS AAn:7'S ALL PARCELS. . 1NDICA1CS FrJtJM) 1KNf.IIIOI"A$ NOTED. o ':ri:rTESNAll.SCT~';ArRCCPrPJriAGCED R.CE. J165.J Fl./J9IItT All. COIlNCRS ( ) INDICA TES 1lEASUf?CD ANI) RaoNJ PER PM JatO?, PM8 204/50-64- 1H1S PA/I'CCl MH CONTAINS ""'I AC (;ROSS ",7H1N 1H€OISrwcnIlFBORtJER. tJlMINACE CASDlCNTS SHAI..L BE' KEPT FREE OF BIII/.1JtN(;S AND alS71nJC1/ONS. '~INDICA1CSHCSlRICrEDACC!"S:S'fNQfTS., OJRIF DATA' I ""11": fRfn I!\,'\S I'i.'l/I' l~l!I"1 .J, eo 0 eo ~~-- Scale 1" ~ '" 60' FOI.ffl) t' lP. STAMPm LSJ7T2 PER PIJ8 '99/89-'2, AfXEp7!J) AS CENTFR<.W< Be L-2tJl.81' . . \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \, \ ~ \ \ \ F()(h,f) "/.P. TA(;(;C(fI.S26Q2, UP .,' PER,.,. 'W7"'~ _\ -~'~ \ ".pl. ~' FOUND BRASS CAP sr~ l.SJtJ/tJ. ACa:J>rElJ AS e.c. i PMB /92/.18-46 LfCINtTYIIAP .. Map of Overland Dr & Ynez Rd Temecula, CA by MapQuest Page 1 of2 ~ - MA~QYES't ~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ Mal - - Seal '.".,~> Airp FIND I! MAPS DIRECTIONS tlQJn~ I !i<;jp, I S~!tlnas I M.oblle I IQ91b,a ~ YELLOW PAGl!5 Busi Discount Hotel Rooms Our Exclusive Rates Come With A 110% Lowest Price Guarantee www.CheapTickets.com EXRedia: Discount Hotels Hot Deals at Over 10,000 Hotels Save up to 50% on hotels at Expedia www.Expedia.com *- Overland Dr & Ynez Rd Temecula, CA 92591, U5 HoteLOJf'eIS - EligbLQeals Street M ap I'rjnt I E~~ail I Qownload_to_I'D!\ I l'Jew_~_ap, .; ~Al"o.V[S,.".~ , ... C 2004 NAVTE;Q Get Directions l~~ Above Location Address or Intersection I Search for a Business Business Name or Category I ZOOM IN iSI --.J - --.J --.J --.J --.J --.J --.J --.J --.J m ZOOM OIlT City 1__._, Address IOverland Dr & Ynl City ITemecula I S.tateL~[Q)L, _________.-11 I ~;uill.c;:~tli11[rrectlC1!\~.1 18f;rn[<'l~~a.:c_1 State leA I A,ILrights_Ieser:.ved ,_Use5ubject.toJ..icens,eI.COPYrigpt I t!1QP.legend r N AVTEO 1 ~.l:.'l."'j'.~ This map is informational only. No representation Is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapQuest and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any loss or delay resulting from such use. Choice Hotels Official Slte- Book and Save r with Best Choice e-Rate Guar www.ChoiceHotels.com At Temecula Offers: I Hotels Discount Hotel Our Exclusive Rates C A 110% Lowest Price www.CheapTickets,' EXRedia: Disc;o~ Hot Deals at Over 10, Save up to 50% on hi www.Expedia.com CheaR Hotel~ Find Low Rates from t Experts - Book Online www.hotels.com Temecula Hote Our Lowest Rate Guar Customer Service. 60 www.Travelworm.c( BeauJiful Embas~ Temecula award-win luxurious suites & ma www.embassysuite~ C;,tle,gR.,tio,teI Dee Search 1000's of Hotl Great Rooms for Less www.ORBITZ.com Chea.R HQtels 70% off rates at 29,0' Book online now Lodg www.Lodging.com J:[i~el i fle_l>-i~C;,Q,lI Incredibly Low Prices 40% on Hotels with I www.priceline.com IHotels ~ http:/ /WWW .mapquest.com/maps/map.adp?country=US&countryid=US&addtohistory=&s... 11/10/2004 ITEM 8 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEy~A DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: ,\ City Manager/City Council rr! fl William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 2005 DATE: SUBJECT: Completion and Acceptance of Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2003/2004 - Project No. PW04-11 PREPARED BY: ~reg Butler, Principal Engineer if Scott Harvey, Associate Engineer RECOM!VIENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2003/2004 - Project No. PW04-11 as complete. 2. File a Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one (1) year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the contract. 3. Release the Materials and Labor Bond seven (7) months after filing of the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: At the meeting of June 22, 2004, the City Council awarded the construction contract to International Pavement Solutions, Inc. in the amount of $172,415.00 and authorized the Mayor to execute the contract. One change order for an amount of $12,845.30 (Seventeen additional locations) and a decrease in final quantities decreased the contract amount by $17,900.30, bringing the total cost of the project to $167,360.00. The project consisted of replacin9 damaged sidewalks, curb & gutter, cross gutters, spandrels, driveway approaches, access ramps, and under sidewalk drains throughout the City. The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and within the allotted contract time to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. The construction retention for this project will be released on or about 35 days after the Notice of Completion has been recorded. FISCAL IMPACT: This project was funded through the Public Works Maintenance Division Routine Street Maintenance account. The total cost of the project was $167,360.00. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\01110S\PW04-11 Accept.DOC RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula. CA 92589.9033 NOTICE OF COMPLETION' NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: 1. The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. Nature of Interest Vendee Under Contract. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California 92590. 3. A Contract was awarded by the City of Temecula to International Pavement Solutions, Inc.. P.O. Box 10458 San Bernardino, CA 92423 to perform the following work of improvement: CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY2003-2004 Project No. PW04-11 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of T emecula at a regular meeting thereof held on January 11, 2005. That upon said contract the Safeco Insurance Company of America, 130 W, Vine St., Redlands, CA 92373 was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law, 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY2003-2004 Project No. PW04-11 6. The location of said property is: Various City Streets, Temecula, California Dated at Temecula, California, this 11th day of January, 2004 City of Temecula STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk I, Susan W. Jones CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California and do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded ,in the Office of the Cou~ty Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. ' Dated at Temecula, California, this 11th day of January, 2004. City of Temecula Susan W, Jones CMC, City Clerk R:\CIP\PROJECTS\PW04\PW04-11 pcc Repairs\COMPlETlON NOTE.doc D~e 27 2004 3:42PM HP LASERJET 3330 p. Bond # 6276832 Premium: Inclnded CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MAINTENANCE BOND FOR PROJECT NO. PW04-11 CITY 11117DE CONCRETE REPAiRS FY2003-2004 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT: International Pavement Solutions, Inc., P.O. Box 10458, San Bemanlino, CA 92423-{1458 NAME AND ADDRESS CONTRACTORS a Corpomtion (MIn wftfher 8 CorpmNon, P&Ow.a:- or IhdWuW) , hereinafter called Pri ncipal, and Safeco Inswance Company of America, 130 W. Vine Street, Redlands, CA 92373 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY hereinafter called SURETY, are hold and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA, hereinafter called OWNER, in the penal sum of One Hundred Seventy-Two Thousand Four Hundred Fixteen DOLLARS and No CENTS ($ 172,415.00, \ In lawful money of the United States said sum being not less than tan (10%) of the Contract value payable by the said City of temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by timm presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION Is such that whereas, the Principal entered Into a certain Contract with the OWNER, dated the 22nd day of June 2004 a..C.O.PY of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of PRUJI:CT NO. PW04. 11, CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY2003.2004. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the pedod of one (1) year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the OWNER, against all defects In workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed,'and was the final estimate approved on_ Januaty 11, 2005 ,~ NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor wortmanship in the execution of said wort, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall aprear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain In ful force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void. As a part of the obligation, secured hereby and In addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, Induding reasonable attorneys fees incurred by the City of Temecula In successfully enforcing this obligation, all to be taxed as costs and induded In any judgment rendered. ' MAINTENANCE VlME) M.l FLTlPPWK-CMPWO<WVOU-I I POC NP"fAPWW"l-l I PCC FWPlS Q$f'c Dee 27 2004 3:42PM HP LASERJET 3330 -p_. ( The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed therelJnder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and It does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contact or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 27th day of December .2004. (Seal) SURETY S,.rC<:OlnsunmceC~eriC' By: l '-(ilkJJ g,.6i" . (/ Karen J. BJornestad (Name) , AttomeylnFact (nle) PRINCIPAL International Pavement Solutions. Inc. By: _ c: ~ ~___ (Name) Brent C. Rieger (Tide) President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney By: Dennis C. Rie~r ~" (Name) Treasurer (Tito) . ...C~~ ' , APPROVED AS TO FORM: MAIWINAKE 8M U.2 RZPPRWWMPWUPWD4-11 PM RV"'Ap"'-11 POC AWAh 05M4AX CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of California County of San Bernardino On December 27,2004 . o..t, before me, Gabrielle B. Fulton, Notary Public Name and Title of Officer (e.g., 'Jane Doe, Notary~ublic' personally appeared Karen J. Bjomestad Name{s) of Signet1:s) ~ personally known to me - OR - 0 Jjr9'/oG ta me an tile easis af satisfaGtary e'liaeAGe to be the person{sj whose namefsl is/af6 subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that lleIsheltlley executed the same in llisJher/tlleif authorized capacity{ie6t.- and that by lli6Iher/tlleif signature{sj on the instrument the person{sj, or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s} acted, executed the instrument. GAIlRIEUE 8, F JON . C~lYl' 1452688 Notary PublIC . CallfomlO SOn Il8'OO'dlnO CountY ., Mv' NllY2'1:llXl1 WITNESS my hand and official seal. ~~u-Q(k ~- ~~Lvr~ Signature of Nctary Public OPTIONAL Though the information below is not mquired by law. it may prove valuable to persons relying on the ctJcument snd could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Maintenance Bond Document Date: December 27,2004 Number of Pages: 2 Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Brent C. Rieger Capacity(les) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: Karen J. Bjornestad Signer's Name: o Individual o Corporate Officer nle(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General ~ Attorney-i n- Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o Other: Top of thumb "m - ,- - - - -- ::c.3:: ;:1, o Individual o Corporate Officer Title(s): o Partner - 0 Limited 0 General o Attorney-i n- Fact o Trustee o Guardian or Conservator o other: Top of thumb here - - - - - - -. - - ~ :;- :: c: ::, Signer Is Representing: Signer Is Representing: Safeco InsUl'allCe Company of America CITY OF TEMECULA, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE PROJECT NO. PW04-11 CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY2003-2004 'International Pavement This is to certify that _ Solutions, Inc._, (hereinafter the "CONTRACTOR") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the CONTRACTOR or by any of the CONTRACTOR's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of it's contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as PROJECT NO. PW04-11, CITYWIDE CONCRETE REPAIRS FY2003-2004, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Proje~ No. PW04-11 Citywide Concrete Repairs FY2003-04 INSERT ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The CONTRACTOR declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the CONTRACTOR. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the CONTRACTOR hereby disputes the following amounts: i , f-.JIA Description Dollar Amount to Dispute -A Pursuant to Public Contract Code !j7100, the CONTRACTOR does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the CONTRACTOR by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the CONTRACTOR has, not disputed above. ' CONTRACTOR / / i' Dated: /;)1 c2? l{iY By: Print Name and Tille RElEASE R.l R:'CIF'PROJECTS\PW04\PWQ4.1 j FCC Repais\Specs\PW04.11 FCC Repais 052504.c1oc ITEM 9 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY '-tVI'i, DIRECTOR OF FINANC CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: pity Manager/City Council .-yJ'lANilliam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Authorize Temporary Street Closures for Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event in Old Town. (Old Town Front Street, between Moreno Road and Second Street, and other related streets) PREPARED BY: 11Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works ~teve Charette, Associate Engineer. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM SECOND STREET TO MORENO DRIVE EAST FOR THE GOOD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW 2005 EVENT ON FEBRUARY 25, 26 AND 27, 2005, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT BACKGROUND: The first Annual Good Old Days Car Show necessitates the temporary closure of Old Town Front Street between Second Street and Moreno Drive East as well as abutting streets in the Old Town area on February 25,26 and 27, 2005 to accommodate and provide the "Street Scene" ambience that allows the free movement of pedestrian traffic by minimizing potential vehicular-pedestrian conflicts. The event times will be from 5:00 PM to 8:00 PM on Friday night and 5:00 AM to 6:00 PM for both Saturday and Sunday of the event. Motorists will be detoured through Mercedes Street. The event will accommodate designated handicap parking. Under Vehicular Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways", local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing". The City Council adopted Resolution No. 91-96 on September 10, 1991, which provided standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways. sidewalks, or pUblic right of way. While a process was established for reviews and approvals, no mechanism was provided for delegating authority to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these special events. 1 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\011105\GOOD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW,CLOSURE,doc ~ The recommended resolution delegates the authority to approve temporary street closures for the Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event sponsored by Central Cost Productions, Inc. This authority is limited to and delegated to the City Engineer (or an authorized representative) only. Any other special events requiring temporary street closures, construction related closures, etc., remain subject to the approval of the City Council subject to nules and regulations established by the City Council. These rules and regulations shall also be adopted by resolution in accordance with California Vehicular Code Section 21101. The sponsors of the Good Old Days Car Show Event propose street closures as follows: Old Town Front Street between Moreno Road (E) to Second Street from 4:30 PM to 8:00 PM on Friday, February 25th and 4:30 AM to 6:00 PM on both Saturday, February 26th and Sunday, February 27'h,2005. Vehicles will be detoured through Mercedes Street. In addition, portions of Sixth Street, Fifth Street, Fourth Street, Third Street, and Second Street will be closed (See Attached Exhibit). Main Street will be closed from Mercedes Street to the southwesterly side of the Main Street Bridge. Access is provided to handicap parking lots located at Sixth Street and Mecerdes Street and at First Street and Old Town Front Street. Show car parking will be at designated parking lots and along both sides of Old Town Front Street as shown on the attached Location Map. FISCAL IMPACT: Estimated costs for the Public Works Department Maintenance Division support is estimated at $3,800.00. Adequate funds are available in Account No. 001-164-601-5402. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2005-_. 2. Location Map 2 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\011105\GOOD OLO DAYS CAR SHOW.CLOSURE,doc RESOLUTION NO. 2005-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING STREET CLOSURES FOR OLD TOWN FRONT STREET AND ABUTTING STREETS FROM FIRST STREET TO MORENO DRIVE EAST FOR THE GOOD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW 2005 EVENT ON FEBRUARY 25, 26 AND 27, 2005, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY ENGINEER TO ISSUE A PERMIT FOR THIS SPECIFIC SPECIAL EVENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The California State Vehicle Code provides for the promulgation of rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets by local authorities by Resolution; and, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to establish rules and regulations for the temporary closure of public streets in the interest of promoting safety and protection; and, WHEREAS, The City of Temecula desires to authorize the closure of public streets for the Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event sponsored by Central Coast Productions, Inc. for which such temporary street closures promote the safety and protection of persons using or proposing to use those streets for the special event: and, , WHEREAS, the City Council desires to facilitate the issuance of permission to temporarily close public streets, specifically Old Town Front Street between Second Street and Moreno Road east as well as portions of Sixth Street, Fifth Street, Fourth Street, Main Street, Third Street, and Second Street for the Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event; and, NOW, WHEREAS, the City Council desires to authorize the City Engineer to approve temporary street closures for the Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event sponsored by Central Coast Productions, Inc., and to establish the general rule that all other proposed temporary street closures shall be reviewed and approved subject to conditions, or disapproved, by the City Council; and, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby authorizes the City Engineer to permit temporary street closures for the Good Old Days Car Show 2005 Event, and establishes the general rule that all other temporary public street closures shaH be approved or denied approval by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W.Jones, CMC, City Clerk 3 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\011105\GOOD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW.CLOSURE,doc [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2005- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: o ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: 4 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\0111 05\GOOD OLD DAYS CAR SHOW. CLOSURE-doc 0.. <C :E z o - n if I- II)I'jll!' <C j'jlfli~li!! ~ ~ 6'!~"1 ' 0 d!l~Ull~ ..J tlallptU !lidntn . l< ~ , xeS 83 ~::l -.. I t!!!t:: g PHI;i III Q!IIl'is II ;0:... ..-: ... n ~ N i ~!~~~~R~~~n~~~~~~~i;1i'e~~g~~$12;gg~I~~~~~~~~~~g~III~1i;ggll~ig!~~~~E~~!~!~~~~a~!~~~~"~~~~~2~ .........................................................................<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<~mmmmmmmmmm !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]!]!]!]!]!]]!!!!]]]]!!!!]]]] j ! !,~l,l. 1"'11111. , ,IIIJ i 111111 i 1111, I .1 II 'i'! I , .lljl Ul II I jllji!fJ!fjf~II!~fgiiilliil,ililffifiJI~ifjffJflfjlj!J1;II!i!rJlfl!fffjllljJfl:lfJII~lflfff~i ~ i fO""::!::":!:::!::!,::!:::!"":::!!:!,!! o"(:!S!....tl<t1::l.S!,,..."oo......,! fi f ~oOtl::~:!llHH.IilII'!:;I'i$!.. !l !i '" 8 1 ! ! rd ~ ~ H~ll"ll I ! L'l ~ -g i f ~Ill j I I I I I! I I I I I I I I I I ! I t, If 8 ! I !8 lj Is ! H !,ff f f ~ h ~ 'II I ' I Ii! ilfUfl~njJl ell du ~ dl~hlhd: !l I}! I ; ; I ~ ! f! IlhJlIuu.Aid ] 8 ~~.L-._ ('1ol11I - h'Ulo'.I.l,nl ~ l~~3l~3g~~g~Xll~II~311 ! f "'~~,~,,",'sll ITEM 1 0 APPROVAL~ CITY ATTORNEY -uJ,Pt!; DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT FROM: City Manager/City Council ~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer TO: DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II, Project No. PWOO-09 Approval of the Plans and Specifications and Solicitation of Construction Bids PREPARED BY: mer Attar, Principal Engineer ~A Laura Bragg, Project Engineer~ RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the Construction Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Project No. PWOO-09, Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II. BACKGROUND: The Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II Project will widen Pauba Road to its ultimate width from Margarita Road to west of Showalter Road. This project will include asphalt pavement, curb & gutter, sidewalk, asphalVconcrete berm, drainage facilities and striping for access to the new library site, and construction of the new water line that will service the new Temecula Library. The Plans, Specifications and Contract Documents have been completed and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. These Plans and Specifications are available for review in the City Engineer's office. The Engineer's estimate for this project is $1,766,000.00. FISCAL IMPACT: The Pauba Road Improvements - Phase II is a Capital Improvement Program project funded through Development Impact Fees - Street Improvements and Measure A. ATTACHMENT: 1. Location Map 2. Project Description r:\agdrpt\2002\0423\pw02-05 bid/AJP = ~ ~ ~ I fll ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ '-l b ~ ~ .. ;: E::: 'tl OJ 0' .. ~ ~ " 31lY.> """'- mI taNW"M ....,,"'...... ~"" w o TlEMA R06LE$ ~ / z~ ~ E:: ,~ u ~ I:l .... U E:; ~ ~ ..... ..... '" 0 ~ ~.-~ Eo-< '" '" '" ~ ..0.1::: u ~'ii;9 ~~1;; t: Q) Vl .::: ~ 8 ro ~._ ~ .- t) ~~E lI'l '" ....."0" o liJ 8 ~ '" blJ"O ~ .S liJ 0.9- 6i, ..... J::._ --g Vl ~ o ."0 p:: S '" -~..Q ~.D"'" .- 0 :;; '" ~ bOt) = :;; ~_o "" g:€ ""0"0 ",0"0 ".., '" 0- " ~ 15.- "'0 0.. u"' (Ij ~.~ o '" ~~~ -Els,o (l;jV;'::: "" ~ ~ " 0. '" o ~ " ",- '" ,:11;9 e ~ ~ '" > '" ~ e"'O v 0."", S <:;" . .-.s ~ !? (lj _ 0 .... .- OJ S,o ~..c: blJ:=: o..VlC:U ~ '" '-e ;9 o 'E (1) ;:> '" a 0 1;; s ""E s ~ ~ Q) u 8 g.~ c: "'t:I 0.. v:-;: .S liJ.5 "g ~ 1a 0 (OJ -= .~] ~ ;9 ~V1t:OO ._ v C'j .... c:: uOo.o.:=: ;;.; Eo-< ..... p:: o ~ ~ ..... ..... r.l '" ..( =: ~ I '" Eo-< Z r.l :?j ~ o l:l:: ~ ..... ~ o l:l:: ..( ~ ;:l ..( ~ ;; -= E:: .. u " .~ Q ... ~ ;; i:l o E-<;:: .. Q, u 'C " U Q '" ... " ~Q '" a,,o o a 0"" o " ::: 0 "" '" ~ " '" s '" > o ~ Q, .5 ~ .5 ~ -= ..... o " o .., ,t " o o "0 liJ g; .;;; '" "0 00 " ';;; '" '" o o ~ \00. ~] on " \0 '" d g _ 0 '" ~ 'S: ci " Z '" ~.s o '" 0"0 o " <<:; I .5 -E- o .- ::: ~ ~ o 0 . ;.:u"'O .D ''='1 (lj ::3 e 0 """"p:: 2 .;;; " Q .. ... " ..'C.. ~ S u(l ~ ~ " OJ .. " &;.. .;: u " ,~ .;.: E ~~ S... t: Q '" ~ " Q QJj '" ;9 o ~ '" '" '" o o '" '" "0 'S: o ~ "0 liJ " o .~ -= g 'u o 12 1'; '" > o ~ .5 ;::;0 .~ ~"' 'OM "'~ e (',1" "" .;: '" o U .. u " .~ Q ... e5~ " - " .f! " Q ~E-< o I-- .!3 ~ N (l;I C'\S .q-" .e Q on U Q ..(.. '" 000 000 000 0" \0"' v)"' 0\00 1--. - - 000 MOM a, on "" 00" r-"' t---"' ,,"_M o ",. {;I}V7~V7Ytf;l} a, o , QO o o .... ..... o oJ, o o .... \0 o J, o o .... 00 00 on on r-:r-: - - '" '" 0000 000("1'1 1/')0000\ Cl 0 \0" ..,.) 00" ..J.O\OO,," g...... ~- .... YtYt6"7Yt o o o N M - '" '" blJ " .;::: '" '" " '5h " c ~ -a .g g s E (lj ._ ..... <l) .~ ~ ~ 6i, ~ '" 's ~ ~ 'Vi .~ '5 "Ooo~=o <UU.....~... 000 I-- M 0 I-- a, I-- -~ ff)0\ -~.. 0-'" \0 \0 '" ~ N" '" '" '" o M a, 0;- - o ",. '" '" 1:i '" S '" > o ~ 0. e ..... ~ '" '" ;::; lI'l '" .... '" , >. '" ;:::: ~ g ~ E '0 < g, s ..... o 1:i o "'.... O. S ~ V)g.~ " " > ~ ] '" '" 0 ",o::'EEo-< o ..... '" \0. 00 - bO " '6 !3 ~ ;,; .. '" o '" U"O :?j ~ o(l~ 0'0 " " ... U " ... .. " " Q ~'" ITEM 11 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY .-uJ.A DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER -?:JJ- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council IlJs:r\William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Amendment NO.2 to Professional Services Agreement with Valj Cooper & Associates, Inc. for Inspection Services for Various CIP Projects PREPARED BY: Greg Butler, Principal Engineer David McBride, Senior Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve Amendment NO.2 to the Agreement with Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. to provide professional inspection services, in an amount not to exceed $45,000.00, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: The Capital Improvement Project (CIP) Division of the Public Works Department currently has one of its full-time inspectors serving our Country in Iraq for seven months. He is expected to end his tour of Duty at the end of January of 2005. In order to fill the gap of this temporary staffing shortage, and to cover exceptionally high work loads staff requested proposals for inspection services and Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. was deemed the most qualified and cost effective proposal. The original Agreement with Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc., in the amount of $24,000.00, was approved administratively and Amendment No.1, approved by City Council on August 10, 2004, increased the total compensation by $121,000.00, for an Agreement total of $145,000.00 Based on actual expenditures through the end of November of 2004 and our forecast of inspection needs going forward, we anticipate the current Agreement amount of $145,000.00 will be exhausted in the middle of the January 2005. Further we do not have an exact date when our inspector will be returning from Iraq and many of our current projects have substantial night work components. Therefore we are requesting an additional $45,000.00 be added to the Agreement, $190,000.00 total, to cover inspection needs through the end of February. R:\AGENDA REPOATS\ZOO5\01 1 1 05\Vali Cooper Amend 2.doc FISCAL IMPACT: Inspection services are funded in the administrative (5801) portion of various CIP Projects. The amount of the original inspection Agreement was $24,000.00. Amendment NO.1 was for an amount not to exceed $121,000.00, for an Agreement total of $145,000.00. Amendment NO.2 is for an amount not to exceed $45,000 for an Agreement total of $190,000. Funding for the original Agreement and Amendment No. 1 were identified previously. Adequate funds for Amendment NO.2 have been identified in the following projects: 1. Project / Account # Pechanga Pkwy Storm Drain and Channel (210.165.668.5801 ) Amount $ 25,000.00 2. Pavement Rehabilitation (Jefferson Avenue) (210.165.621.5801 ) $ 20,000.00 Total $ 45,000.00 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Amendment NO.2 2 R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2Q05\011105\Vali Cooper Amend 2.doc SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND VAll COOPER & ASSOCIATES,INC. VARIOUS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of January 11, 2005 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation ("City") and Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc, ("Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with respect to the following facts and purposes: A. , On July 22,2004 the City and Consultant entered into that certain agreement entitled "City of Temecula Agreement for professional inspection services ("Agreement") in the amount of $24,000.00 ("Agreement"). B. The Agreement for additional inspection services was amended on August 10, 2004, in the amount of $121,000,00, for a total contract amount of One Hundred Forty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($145,000.00) the Agreement as amended shall be referred to as the "Agreement." C. The parties now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2, Section 5 of the Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit A, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent 0 n t he above tasks. T he Second Amendment for additional inspection services amount shall not exceed Forty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($45,000.00) for inspection services. The maximum amount of payment under this Agreement shall not exceed the total Agreement amount of One Hundred and Ninety Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($190,000.00) for the total term of the Agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. 3, Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreementto be executed the day and year first above written. R:\Agreements\CIP Mise AgreementsWali Amendment 2.doc CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT Vali Cooper & Associates, Inc. Agnes Weber, Executive Vice President 41 Washington Avenue Point Richmond, CA 94801 (510) 788-6028 Regional Office 3900 Market Street, Suite 250 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 788-6028 Agnes Weber, P.E., Executive Vice President Connie Preston, Executive Vice President (Two Signatures Required For Corporations) 2 R:\Agreements\CIP Mise Agreements\Vali Amendment 2.doc ITEM 12 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY P DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: ~~illiam G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 11. 2005 SUBJECT: State Route 79 Relinquishment PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. OS-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FROM THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) TO PROCEED WITH THE PHYSICAL RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SR 79) AND DEFERRMENT OF THE NEGOTIATED PAYMENT IDENTIFIED IN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO. 8-1258 TO A LATER DATE, AS DETERMINED BY THE AVAILlBIL TY OF STATE FUNDING BACKGROUND: On November 9, 2004, the City Council unanimously approved Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258 with the State of California to accept the relinquishment of those portions of State Route 79 (SR 79) located within the City's boundaries. At that time, we anticipated formal approval of the Cooperative Agreement by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in January 2005 with the actual transfer of the facilities to occur by March/April 2005. Last week, Caltrans' State Headquarters notified our local Caltrans' District 8 office that this matter may be pulled from the CTC's agenda in January due to certain provisions of the Agreement that require the State to pay the City an amount of $750,000 as part of the terms of the relinquishment. After consulting with our District 8 office, it was recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution requesting special consideration from the CTC to proceed with the physical relinquishment of the highway and allow for the deferment of the $750,000 payment until the State would be able to provide the funding. If the CTC does not consider the City Council's request at the January 2005 commission meeting, Caltrans' Headquarters indicated that the matter may be rescheduled for the March or April CTC meeting (there is no February meeting). Although there has been some indication that the State may be able to release transportation related funds sometime near the end of the R:\agdrpt\05\0111\Relinquishment.CaltransAgrmnt fiscal year, it is unknown if this funding would facilitate the relinquishment of SR 79. In any event, staff is recommending that the City Council adopt the following resolution in an effort to support the State in mitigating their financial constraints at this time, and avoid further delays in the relinquishment of SR 79 to the City of Temecula. FISCAL IMPACT: The CTC may deiay the relinquishment of SR 79 until adequate State funding is made available, or approve the City's request to defer the $750,000 payrnent to a later date. The fiscal impact to the City is unknown until the CTC takes action on this matter. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 05-_ R:\agdrptI05\0111\RelinquishmentCaltransAgrmnt 2 RESOLUTION NO, 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA REQUESTING CONSIDERATION FROM THE CALIFORNIA TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (CTC) TO PROCEED WITH THE PHYSICAL RELINQUISHMENT OF STATE ROUTE 79 (SR 79) AND DEFERRMENT OF THE NEGOTIATED PAYMENT IDENTIFIED IN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT NO, 8-1258 TO A LATER DATE, AS DETERMINED BY THE AVAILlBIL TY OF STATE FUNDING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Temecula and Caltrans' District 8 have determined that the residents and motorists of Temecula would be much better served if these segments of SR 79 functioned as local thoroughfares rather than State controlled highways. WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, the City Council unanimously approved Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258 between the City of Temecula and the State of California to accept the relinquishment of those portions of State Route 79 (SR 79) located within the City's boundaries. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula and Caltrans' District 8 anticipated formal approval of the Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258 by the California Transportation Commission (CTC) in January 2005 with the actual transfer of the facilities to occur by March/April 2005. WHEREAS, Caltrans' State Headquarters has indicated that Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258 may be pulled from the CTC's agenda in January due to the State's budget constraints affecting its ability to fulfill the provisions of the Agreement that require the State to pay the City a negotiated amount of $750,000 as part of the terms of the relinquishment. WHEREAS, the City of Temecula recognizes that the State's budget crisis has severely impacted its ability to fund transportation related projects. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula, as follows: Section 1, The City Council desires to support the State in mitigating their concerns regarding the financial obligations identified in Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258, and approves the deferment of said payment to the City of Temecula to a later date, as determined by the availability of State funding. Section 2, The City Council hereby appeals to the CTC to proceed with the approval of Cooperative Agreement No. 8-1258 and the physical relinquishment of those portions of SR 79 to the City of Temecula at their January 2005 Commission Meeting. Section 3, The City Council hereby finds that the proposed transfer of ownership is statutorily exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines because there is no possibility that the City's acceptance of operation and maintenance responsibilities and control of signal timing will have a significant effect on the environment. ; PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of'the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. R:lagdrptI05\0111IRelinquishmentCaltransAgrmnt 3 Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January 2005, by the following vote: AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 AYES: 0 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 0 COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\agdrpt\05\0111\Relinquishmenl.CaltransAgrmnt 4 ITEM 13 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY -uJ1l DIRECTOR OF FINANCE CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council ~1~William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer January 11, 2005 DATE: SUBJECT: TEMECULA LODGING, LLC Median Reimbursement Agreement PREPARED BY: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the TEMECULA LODGING, LLC Median Reimbursement Agreement between the City of Temecula and TEMECULA LODGING, LLC, in the amount of $163,255.94, and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement. BACKGROUND: On February 5, 2003, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approved Planning Application No. PA 02-0643 allowing DEVELOPER to develop a 55,809 square foot hotel on 2.41 acres located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 275 feet north of Rancho California Road. The Project name is HAMPTON INN & SUITES. Condition No. 65 of the Conditions of Approval of PA 02-0643 provides that prior to Occupancy of the hotel the DEVELOPER is required to install a 14 foot raised landscaped median from the southerly boundary to approximately 100 feet north of the private driveway accessing the project site on Jefferson Avenue. In addition, the City required the DEVELOPER to extend the raised landscaped median from the southerly property boundary approximately 275 feet to the intersection of Rancho California Road for public safety reasons. DEVELOPER had completed the median construction and has paid the required DIF Fee for the project at the time building permits were issued. The fees paid for this project was $86,483.01. DEVELOPER applied for OIF Reimbursement for half the cost of the 14 foot raised landscaped median fronting their property, which was $35,659.34, and 100% of the cost beyond the project frontage, which was $127,596.60, because it met the definition of Regional Irnprovements. This is typically the way the City has reimbursed Developers for construction of offsite medians. City staff has verified the invoices and has confirmed that the amount eligible for DIF Reimbursement was $163,255.94. The CITY now desires to refund the overpayment of DIF Fees in the amount of $86,483.01 as well as reimburse DEVELOPER for cost beyond the project frontage in the additional amount of $76,772.93 for a total of $163,255.94. FISCAL IMPACT: There would be a refund of the DIF fees collected for this project in the amount of $86,483.01. In addition, $76,772.93 would be paid from the CIP Budget for Raised Medians Citywide for a total reimbursement of $163,255.94. ATTACHMENTS: TEMECULA LODGING, LLC Median Reimbursement Agreement Hampton Inn Median Cost Summary R:lagdrptlagendaform/ajp REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT For MEDIAN CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND TEMECULA LODGING, LLC THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of January 11,2005, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "CITY" and TEMECULA LODGING, LLC, hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER". In consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: SECTION I. Recitals. This A9reement is made with respect to the following facts and purposes, which each of the parties hereto agree are true and correct: a, On February 5, 2003, the Plannin9 Commission of the City of Temecula approved Planning Application No. PA 02-0643 allowing DEVELOPER to develop a 55,809 square foot hotel on 2.41 acres located on the east side of Jefferson Avenue, approximately 275 feet north of Rancho California Road. The Project name is HAMPTON INN & SUITES. b, Condition No. 65 of the Conditions of Approval of PA 02-0643 provides that prior to Occupancy of the hotel the DEVELOPER is required to install a 14 foot raised landscaped median from the southerly boundary to approximately 100 feet north of the private driveway accessin9 the project site on Jefferson Avenue, In addition, the City required the DEVELOPER to extend the raised landscaped median from the southerly property boundary approximately 275 feet to the intersection of Rancho California Road and to furnish and install a southbound Video Detection Camera at Rancho California Road and Jefferson Avenue. c. DEVELOPER applied for DIF Reimbursement for half the cost of the 14 foot raised landscaped median and 100% of the cost beyond the project frontage because it met the definition of Regional Improvements; d. DEVELOPER had completed the median construction and has paid the required DIF Fee for the project at the time building permits were issued. The fees paid for this project was $86,483.01; e, CITY has verified the invoices and has confirmed that the amount eligible for Median Reimbursement and related work was $163,255,94. f. CITY now desires to reimburse DEVELOPER for construction of the raised landscaped median in Jefferson Avenue and related work in the amount of $163,255.94; g, The parties now desire to set forth the terms of the CITY's reimbursement. SECTION II. Construction of Improvements, DEVELOPER shall have constructed and installed all of the improvements described above in accordance with plans and specifications approved by the Director of Public Works (the "Director") and subject to the terms of this Agreement. R:\AGENDA REPORTS\2005\0111 05\TEMECULA LODGING REIMBERSEMENTagmt.doc SECTION III, CITY Obligations, In order to implement the construction of the Improvements pursuant to this Agreement, CITY shall: a, Review and approve design of the Improvements b. Obtain possession all of necessary rights of way necessary for the construction of the Improvements. c. Pay to the DEVELOPER the sum specified in Section I. f. SECTION IV. DEVELOPER Obligations. In order to coordinate the construction of the Improvements, DEVELOPER shall have: a. Provided CITY with its completed plans and specifications for the construction of the described Improvements; b, Constructed and install the Improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the Director of Public Works; c. Obtained the bids of not less than three qualified bidders, as approved by the Director of Public Works, and awarded the construction contract to the lowest responsible bidder; d, Required the contractor to pay prevailing wages for the work in accordance with Labor Code Section 1770 et seq. and applicable regulations of the State Labor Commissioner; e. Supervise and manage the construction of the Improvements; SECTION V. Inspection. DEVELOPER shall pay the required inspection fees and CITY will provide inspection for improvements as conditioned for their development. SECTION VI. Notices, Any payments or notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (I) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: CITY: City of Temecula P;O. Box 9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92590 Attn: Ronald J. Parks, Deputy Director of Public Works (951) 694-6411 DEVELOPER: TEMECULA LODGING, LLC 415 North 4th Street Aberdeen, SD 57402 Attn: Mike Webber (605) 229-0030 R:\kENOA REPORTS\2005\011105\TEMECULA LODGING RE1MBERSEMENTagmt.doc Either party may change its address for notices by notifying the other party. All notices 9iven at the most recent address specified, shall be deemed to have been properly given. SECTION VII: Applicable Law. The CITY and DEVELOPER understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this A9reement. SECTION VIII: Litigation. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event litigation is filed by one or more of the parties to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such litigation shall be entitled to an award of reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses as determined by the Court, SECTION IX: Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties relating to apportionment and reimbursement of the costs of the Improvements. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, relating to the reimbursement for the costs of the Improvements are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. SECTION X, Independent Investigation. Each party is entering into this A9reement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material, SECTION XI: Indemnification. Each party shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the other party, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the indemnified party, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of other party's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms, of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the indemnified party's own negligence or wrongful conduct. SECTION XII. Authority to Execute Agreement. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of DEVELOPER and CITY each warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this A9reement on behalf of the DEVELOPER or CITY, as applicable, and has the authority to bind DEVELOPER or CITY, as applicable, to the performance of its obli9ations hereunder. SECTION XIII. Counterparts, This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which when so executed and delivered shall be deemed to be an original and all of which counterparts taken together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. SECTION XIV. Modification, No modification, wavier or discharge of this Agreement shall be valid unless the same is in writing and si9ned by the party against which enforcement of such modification, waver or discharge is or may be sought. SECTION XV, Further Assurances. Each party shall take all actions reasonably necessary to implement the terms of this A9reement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year, first above written. R:\dGENDA REPORTS\2005\011105\TEMECULA LODGING REIMBERSEMENTagmt.doc CITY OF TEMECULA Jeff Comerchero, Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney DEVELOPER TEMECULA LODGING, LLC 41 5 North 4th Street Aberdeen, SDD 57402 Attn: Mike Webber By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: R:\&-GENDA REPORTS\2005\Ol 1 1 05\TEMECULA LODGING REIMBERSEMENTagmt.doc JEFFERSON AVENUE - MAJOR HIGHWAY 110 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY 14 FOOT WIDE RAISED LANDSCAPE MEDIAN PROPERTY FRONTAGE: ADDITIONAL LENGTH: CREDIT LENGTH (FT): TRAFFIC VIDEO 224 50% CREDIT 375 100% CREDIT 599 $35,659.34 $119,471.60 $8,125,00 TOTAL REIMBURSEMENT $163,255,94 COST PER LF $318.43 BASED ON DOCUMENTS PROVIDED BY DEVELOPER $190,790.28 ** SOURCE: Parcel Map No. 28809 Street Improvement Plans - City approved 11/5/98 Hampton Inn 1 12/28/2004 Hampton Inn DATE OF INVOICE INVOICE INVOICE REFERENCE AMOUNT CITY OF TEMECULA 07/08104 CSD03-054 $500.00 $500,00 D & D CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION, INC 04/01/04 1404 $5,372.48 06/02/04 1412 $4,550,00 06/02/04 1414 $1,641.26 06/02/04 1415 $5,000,00 02/25/04 CO $11,798,00 $28,361.74 DOUBLE D PIPELINE, INC 03/09/04 4 $2,300.00 $2,300.00 GLENN F, BARTON 04/29/04 0089-04 $12,557.00 04/29/04 009~4 $52,309.00 05/12/04 0098-04 $20,541.14 $85,407.14 JOHN MANNINGER ELECTRIC 05114/04 CO 14, $5,966.00 $5,966.00 MACADEE ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION 04/08/04 2511 $8,125.00 $8,125.00 PRO BUILT 03/12/04 653 $1,500.00 04/15/04 661 $2,500.00 05/12/04 665 $2,883.00 06/15/04 672 $899.40 $7.782.40 PRO ENTERPRISES 04/22/04 1126 $4,9~0,00 $4,980.00 SOUTHLAND PAVING, INC 04/22/04 4826-3 $4,558.00 OS/21/04 14965 $3,651.00 OS/21/04 14524 $1,431.00 $9,640,00 SUNSET LANDSCAPING 04130/04 13716 $5,157.00 05/31/04 13785 $31,679.00 07112/04 1049 $1,392,00 $38,228,00 TOTAL COST FOR MEDIAN: $190,790,28 1 of 1 PW\BOSTRE\OIF\CREDITS\Hampton Inn revised 2/5/01 ITEM 14 APPROVAj., ,L';) CITY ATTORNEY 'Wp&iJI FINANCE DIRECTO CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community service~ DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Renovation of the Swimming Pool at Temecula Elementary School PREPARED BY: ~~ Phyllis L. Ruse, Deputy Director of Community Services RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve renovations to the Temecula Elementary School (TES) Swimming Pool in the amount of $142,500 as a FY 2004/05 Capital Project. 2. Approve the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $67,500 from the Dog Park to the TES Pool Project. 3. Approve the transfer of appropriations in the amount of $75,000 from the Skate Park Drainage Project to the TES Pool Project. 4. Authorize the release of a formal public bid for the Temecula Elementary School Swimming Pool Improvement Project. BACKGROUND: In December 1996, the Temecula Valley Unified School District (District) and the Temecula Community Services District (TSCD) entered into a Joint Use Agreement (Agreement) for the use of the ball fields and swimming pool atTemecula Elementary School (TES) as public park facilities during non-school hours. In January 2003, the Agreement was amended to transfer complete scheduling and maintenance responsibilities for the pool, deck, pool house, pump room, and appurtenant facilities to the TCSD, as the District no longer had any need for the pool at TES. With the amendment, the TCSD accepted all responsibility for all utility, repair, maintenance and renovation costs for the pool and appurtenant facilities. The TCSD continues to offer a full complement of learn-to-swim classes and other aquatic programs at the TES venue. Without the TES pool, the TCSD would be unable to meet the current number of swim lessons offered to the community. The TES pool is approximately 25 years old and in serious need of renovation. Staff has been making moderate repairs and renovations to the facility each year through the department's operating R:\RUSEPIAGENDASITES pool (enovations-cc-1-11-0S.doc budget in an attempt to keep the facility operational. During last summer's aquatic programming, it becarne apparent that the pool equipment will require renovation prior to the next Capital Improvement Program cycle. The facility is now in a state that requires significant renovations in order to continue to serve as a viable recreational swimming pool for the community. The renovations needed are a new filtration system and circulation pumps, automated chlorination system, automated PH system, automated monitoring system, deck repairs, and replacement fencing. Establishing and funding a capital improvement projectforthe necessary renovations to the TES pool will allow staff to make the necessary improvements to the facility so that it will remain a reliable venue for community use. The TCSD offers approximately 1,400 learn-to-swim lessons and other aquatic programs at TES pool each year. Without the needed repairs, it is not certain that the facility will accommodate that usage in the next year. The requested renovations are necessary in order for the TCSD to be able to continue providing aquatic and athletic programs and activities to the community at this site. These renovations will provide a temporary solution for the pool. More extensive renovations will be necessary in the future for continued use of the site. Staff anticipates budgeting for those ultimate renovations through the Capital Improvement Program process. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated cost for the necessary renovations is $142,500. Funds are available from cost savings or project start delays in other CIP projects budgeted and funded in the current fiscal year. Transfer of funds from these projects will provide the necessary budget to complete the TES pool renovations. R:IRUSEPIAGENDASITES pool renovations-co-1.11-0S,doc ITEM 15 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM:' William G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO, 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RATIFYING EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES FOR THE RESTORATION OF PORTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY THEATER AND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM SITES CAUSED BY STORM WATER AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES FOR THE IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE DURING THE RAINY SEASON 2. Approve a contract with Road Builders, Inc. in the amount of $125,000 to provide the necessary emergency repairs and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract. 3. Appropriate $125,000 from the City's General Fund Designated Fund Balance for Flood Control. BACKGROUND: Due to the recent and extraordinary storm activity, Murrieta Creek has experienced significant erosion along the portion of the embankment adjacent to the Community Theater and Children's Museum sites. As a result, staff has determined that it is necessary to provide immediate emergency repairs to the embankment to provide protection from further erosion and property damage, which is why this emergency expenditure was authorized. Staff has consulted with Road Builders, Inc., currently working on the Pechanga Parkway Drainage Channel, to evaluate the situation. They have presented an estimate of $125,000 to provide immediate emergency labor, equipment and materials to install one-ton rock slope protection along the damaged embankment. R:\agdrpt\2005\011105,Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek 1 In addition, due to the eminent danger of further erosion and potential damage to the Theater site and Children's Museum parking lot, staff has directed the contractor for the Theater project to take necessary precautions to redirect the low flow of Murrieta Creek away from the problem area by removing silt deposited within the channel. The emergency work performed by the theater contractor is estimated to cost $10,000. There are adequate funds in the Community Theater project contingency to cover the emergency work at this time, however it will be necessary to replenish the project's contingency fund in the future. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the emergency contract with Road Builders, Inc. in the amount of $125,000 to install immediate emergency repairs to the embankment. FISCAL IMPACT: An appropriation in the amount of $125,000 from the City's General Fund Designated Fund Balance for Flood Control is necessary to fund the contract with Road Builders, Inc. ATTACHMENTS: 1. 2. Resolution No. 05-_ Contract with Road Builders, Inc. R:\agdrpt\2005\011105.Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek 2 RESOLUTION NO, 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RATIFYING EMERGENCY EXPENDITURES FOR THE RESTORATION OF PORTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY THEATER AND CHILDREN'S MUSEUM SITES CAUSED BY STORM WATER AND AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES FOR THE IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE SITE TO PREVENT FURTHER DAMAGE DURING THE RAINY SEASON THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1, declares that: The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby finds, determines and a. Due to the extraordinary storm activity during the period of December 27, 2004 through December 31,2004, Murrieta Creek has experienced significant erosion along the portion of the embankment adjacent to the Community Theater and Children's Museum sites (collectively the "Site"). Additionally, weather reports indicated that extraordinary storms were predicted for the period of January 6, 2005 through January 10, 2005, and were likely to create maximum flows and significant erosion in the Murrieta Creek banks adjoining the Site unless the required repairs are made. Without immediate repair of this embankment, the anticipated additional storms will cause significant damage to the Site and could significantly damage the Theater and Museum buildings and structures located on the Site. Therefore, it is necessary to provide immediate emergency repairs to the embankment to provide protection from further erosion and property damage. b. The estimate of the cost of the emergency work to provide labor, equipment and materials to immediately install one-ton rock slope protection along the damaged embankment at the Site is $125,000.00. c. In addition, due to the eminent danger of further erosion and potential damage to the Site and the buildings thereon, the Director of Public Works directed the contractor for the Theater project to take necessary precautions to redirect the low flow of Murrieta Creek away from the problem area by removing silt deposited within the channel. The emergency work performed by the theater contractor is estimated to cost $10,000. d Based on the findings set forth above, the City Council of the Temecula hereby finds and determines that embankment repair and fortification work described above must be immediately undertaken in order to avoid further damage to the Site and the buildings thereon, and is necessary for the protection of the public health, safety and general welfare. Based on the findings set forth above, the work proposed constitutes emergency work in accordance with Public Contract Code Section 22050. This emergency and the anticipated remaining effects of the rainy season will not permit the delay resulting from a competitive solicitation for bids and that this action is necessary in order to respond to the emergency. e. The City of T emecula further finds and determines that, based upon the findings set forth above, full compliance with the otherwise applicable requirements of the Public Contracts Code would be unavailing, would not produce an advantage for the City, and would thus be undesirable, impractical, and impossible. The City's authority to proceed with the embankment work in this manner was well established in Graydon v. Pasadena Redevelopment Agency et a/. (1980) 104 Cal. App. 20d 631 and the cases cited therein. R:\agdrpt\2005\011105.Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek 3 Section 2. Based on the findings set forth above, the actions approved by this Resolution are exempt from the application of the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") by virtue of the categorical and statutory exemptions set forth in the following sections of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs.): Section 15301 (repair of existing facilities); Section 15302 (replacement of existing structures); Section 15304 (minor alterations to land); and Section 15269 (emergency projects). Section 3. The City Council of the City of T emecula, pursuant to the findings and authorities cited above, hereby approves that certain Agreement between the City and Road Builders, Inc., for the emergency embankment work along Murrieta Creek at the Community Theater and Children's Museum Sites and authorizes the City Manager to execute the Agreement in substantially the form submitted to the City. The City Council hereby ratifies the actions taken by the City Manger and Director of Public Works in the emergency work taken to repair the embankments adjoining the Site and to protect the Site from further storm damage. Section 4, The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th day of January, 2005. ' Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W, Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) SS CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 05-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January, 2005 by the following vote: R:\agdrpt\2005\011105.Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek 4 AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\agdrpt\2005\01110S.Emergency Expenditure - Murrieta Creek 5 CITY OF TEMECULA EMERGENCY CONTRACT AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY RIP-RAP INSTALLATION MURRIETA CREEK RESTORATION THIS EMERGENCY CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, made and entered into as of January 11, 2005 by and between the City of Temecula, and Road Builders, Inc. ("Contractor"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth, herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. SCOPE OF WORK. Contractor shall construct and install all of the work described in the Scope of Work, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. ("Work") and shall provide and furnish all the labor, materials, necessary tools, expendable equipment, and all utility and transportation services required for the Work. All of said Work to be performed and materials to be furnished for the Work shall be in strict accordance with the specifications set forth in the Scope of Work. The Work shall be completed within the time set forth in the Scope of Work. Contractor shall not commence the Work until such time as directed in writing by the City of Temecula. 2. COST OF WORK. For the Work described in Section I. of this Agreement Contractor shall receive no more than the sum of One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($125,000.00) payable in accordance with the Schedule of Payments, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit A. This amount, One Hundred Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents, shall not exceed the attached scope of work unless additional payment is approved as provided by this Agreement. Contractor shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager. Contractor shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed by the City Manager and Contractor at the time City's written authorization is given to Contractor for the performance of said services. 3. PAYMENT. Contractor will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non-disputed fees. If the City disputes any of contractor's fees it shall give written notice to Contractor within 30 days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. 4. PERFORMANCE. Contractor shall at all times faithfully, competently and to the best of his or her ability, experience, and talent, perform all tasks described herein. Contractor shall employ, at a minimum, generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Contractor hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. Contractor shall cause a full time experienced Superintendent to be present on the site during all construction and to oversee and supervise the Work. 5. CITY APPROVAL. All labor, materials, tools, equipment, and services shall be furnished and work performed and completed subject to the approval of the City or its authorized representatives, and the quality of the workmanship shall be guaranteed for one year from date of acceptance. R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract 6. WAIVER OF CLAIMS. On or before making final request for payment under Paragraph 2., above, Contractor shall submit to the City, in writing, all claims for compensation under or arising out of this contract; the acceptance by Contractor of the final payment shall constitute a waiver of all claims against the City under or arising out of this Contract except those previously made in writing and request for payment. Contractor shall be required to execute an affidavit, release and indemnify agreement with each claim for payment. 7 . PREVAILING WAGES. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. These rates are on file with the City Clerk. Copies may be obtained at cost at the City Clerk's office of Temecula. Contractor shall post a copy of such wage rates at the job site and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the District, as a penalty, the sum of $25.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this contract, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Contract. 8. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE. a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Contractor at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Contractor shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Contractor the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Contractor will submit an invoice to the City pursuant to Section 3. 9. DEFAULT OF CONTRACTOR. a. The Contractor's failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Contractor is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, the City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Contractor for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Contractor. If such failure by the Contractor to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Contractor's control, and without fault or negligence of the Contractor, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Contractor is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Contractor with written notice of the default. The Contractor shall have (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Contractor fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 2 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract 10. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor agrees to defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers from and against any and all claims, demands, losses, defense costs or expenses, or liability of any kind or nature which the City, its officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur or which may be imposed upon them for injury to or death of persons, or damage to property arising out of Contractor's negligent or wrongful acts or omissions in performing or failing to perform under the terms of this Agreement, excepting only liability arising out of the sole negligence of the City. 11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. Contractor shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Contractor, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: (I) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001). (2) Insurance Services Office form number CA 0001 (Ed. 1/87) covering Automobile Liability, code I (any auto). (3) Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Contractor shall maintain limits no less than: (1) General Liability: $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. (2) Automobile Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage. (3) Employer's Liability: $1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury or disease. c. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City Manager. At the option of the City Manager, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) The City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insureds as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Cont~actor; products and completed 3 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract operations of the Contractor; premises owned, occupied or used by the Contractor; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Contractor. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insured maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (4) The Contractor's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, voided, canceled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. e. Accentabilitv of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. f. Verification of Coverage. Contractor shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the District before 'work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Contractor's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. g. Contractor, by executing this Agreement, hereby certifies: "I am aware of the provision of Section 3700 of the Labor Code which requires every employer to be insured against liability for Workman's Compensation or undertake self- insurance in accordance with the provisions of that Code, and I will comply with such provisions before commencing the performance of the work of this Contract. " 12. TIME OF THE ESSENCE. Time is of the essence in this Contract. 13. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR. Contractor is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Contractor shall at all times be under Contractor's exclusive direction and control. Neither the City nor any of its officers, employees or agents shall have control over the conduct of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, employees or agents, except as set forth in this Agreement. Contractor shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Contractor shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, 4 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind the City in any manner. No employee benefits shall be available to Contractor in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Contractor as provided in the Agreement, the City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contractor for performing services hereunder for the City. The City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contractor for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 14. LEGAL RESPONSIBILiTiES. The Contractor shall keep itself informed of State and Federal laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Contractor shall at all times observe and comply with all such laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Contractor to comply with this section. 15. CONTRACTOR'S INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION. No plea of ignorance of conditions that exist or that may hereafter exist or of conditions of difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the work under this Contract, as a result of failure to make the necessary independent examinations and investigations, and no plea of reliance on initial investigations or reports prepared by the City for purposes of letting this Contract out to proposal will be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Contractor to fulfill in every detail all requirements of this Contract. Nor will such reasons be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 16. CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT. After the completion of the Work coniemplated by this Contract, Contractor shall file with the City Manager his affidavit stating that all workmen and persons , employed, all firms supplying materials, and all subcontractors on the Work have been paid in full, and that there are no claims outstanding against the project for either labor or materials, except certain items, if any, to be set forth in an affidavit covering disputed claims or items in connection with a Stop Notice which has been filed under the provisions of the laws of the State of California. 17. BOOKS AND RECORDS. Contractor's books, records, and plans or such part thereof as may be engaged in the performance of this Contract, shall at all reasonable times be subject to inspection and audit by any authorized representative of the City. 18. UTILITY LOCATION. The City acknowledges its responsibilities with respect to locating utility facilities pursuant to California Government Code Section 4215. 19. REGIONAL NOTIFICATION CENTERS. Contractor agrees to contact the appropriate regional notification center in accordance with Government Code Section 4215. 20. INSPECTION. The Work shall be subject to inspection and testing by the City and its authorized representatives during manufacture and construction and all other times and places, including without limitation, the plans of Contractor and any of its suppliers. Contractor shall provide all re,asonable facilities and assistance for the safety and convenience of inspectors. AlI inspections and tests shall be performed in such manner as to not unduly delay the Work. The Work shall be subject to final inspection and acceptance notwithstanding any payments or other prior inspections. Such final inspection shall be made within a reasonable time after completion of the Work. 21. DISCRIMINATION. Contractor represents that it has not, and agrees that it will not, discriminate in its employment practices on the basis of race, creed, religion, national origin, color, sex, age, or handicap. 5 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract 22. WRITTEN NOTICE. Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice: To City: City of Temecula POBox 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: City Manager To Contractor: Road Builders, Inc. 38040 Borel Road Murrieta, California 92563 (951) 696-6962 23. ASSIGNMENT. The Contractor shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City of Temecula. 24. LICENSES.' At all times during the term of this Agreement, Contractor shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 25. GOVERNING LAW. The City and Contractor understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event of litigation between the parties concerning this Contract, the prevailing party as determined by the Court, shall be entitled to actual and reasonable attorney fees and litigation costs incurred in the litigation. 26. PROHIBITED INTEREST. No member, officer, or employee of the City of Temecula or of a local public body shall have any interest, direct or indirect, in the contract of the proceeds thereof during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. Furthermore, the contractor/consultant covenants and agrees to their knowledge that no board member, officer or employee of the City of Temecula has any interest, whether contractual, non-contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, or in the business of the contracting party other than the City of Temecula, and that if any such interest comes to the knowledge of either party at any time, a full and , complete disclosure of all such information will be made, in writing, to the other party or parties, even if such interest would not be considered a conflict of interest under Article 4 )commencing with Section 1090) or Article 4. 6 (commencing with Section 1220) of Division 4 of Title I of the Government Code of the State of California. 27. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement., All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based 6 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-Z005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 28. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT. The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Contractor warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Contractor and has the authority to bind Contractor to the performance of its obligations hereunder. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA Shawn D. Nelson, City Manager Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONTRACTOR ROAD BUILDERS, INC. 38040 Borel Road Murrieta, CA 92563 (951) 696-6962 Joseph Augustine, President 7 R:\maintain\workorders\master comract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK EMERGENCY RIP-RAP INSTALLATION MURRIETA CREEK RESTORATION 8 R:\maintain\workorders\master contract\2004-2005\Master Contract\Road Builders Emergency Contract UL/U~IUp ncv LV:~~ rAA ~~~O~'ZJ'O , KUAV ~UlLU~K~ IN~ IdJUUZ 38010 Borel Rd. Murrieta, Cf 92563 P#UJne: (951) 696-6962 Fax: (951) 696-6963 rlJadhu/ftkrslnc<iill'C,;um.. net January 5, 2005 City ofTemecula Dept. ofPubli~ Worlc$ 43200 Business Park Drive Post Office :Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92590 VIA FACSIMILE TRANSMITI'AL Attn: Steven Beswick Project Engineer Re: Murrieta Creek Dear Steve, I am submitting for your approval, pricing for the emergency placement of rip-rap in the Murrieta Creek Channel attached. Due to time constraints and riP-I1lP delivery we need to access from the west side of the creek. This may result in some rock being wasted to establish a crossing. This proposal does not include re-routing of the flow of water to be done by others, Tfyou decide to have RBI perform this- work, please notifY us immediately so we may mobilize equipment. and begin immediate delivery of the rock. Sincerely, ~ Wayne A. White Project Manager ~1/05/05 WED 10:55 FAX 9518942345 , ROAD BUILDERS INC ~OO~, /------ ';) \;) 8 88 8 0 g8 ~ \:::i CO! ..... gg g ~ ~~ ~ \-0 "1C!. "1 ~ <'1('01 "" 00 ~oO -< 0 0 0 0 -< ...... - - - - J,A.... ~ -j \; :..:- ~ ~ 88 00 88 88 ~ ~ o on --Z g~ g.,: Om 01.0 g'" Or<> on "1.... ...... \l <i e <'l e ...; e '" e +\ ~ PI PI PI PI ,,,,- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ 0 ~ g g g 0 "3 G f-o (; . -~ ......0 -0 ......0 \j\ 3 e;- o 0 0 - C!. o. C!. J;A .... '" <"l .... ~ ~ {t) s ,- \r <S '^ I :...:;:/ ~ ~ c.. \J I \S ~ z z I z z -<t ~ ~ ~~g ~:3g :3g :3g ~ -< I I A '" ~~ , -", . ~ I I ~ ~ 0 I 0 >< ;.... 0 on PI l:Q '" ...... I'><: I'><: '" '" ~ I'><: ~ g 0 ~ ~ !< ,~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ t;1 ...... ... III + ~ ~I ('01 ('01 ~1i~1 !z; ~ ~~~ ~~~I ~Z~ 0' SR~ ~s~~ s~~ ~s~~ g~~1 Ag ~ gg~ o 0' ~ ~Ill_ g~~1 g!SPlE-': SPlE-' SPlE-' :::o~~i o~~1 ~o~~ -('01 -('\ ......'" -<('01 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT DECEMBER 14, 2004 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Community Services District was called to order at 7:09 P.M., at the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 DIRECTORS: Comerchero, Naggar, Roberts, Stone, and Washington ABSENT: o DIRECTORS: None Also present were General Manager Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No comments. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004. 2 Second Amendment to the Excel Landscape. Inc. - Maintenance Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Excel Landscape, Inc. to provide a 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of $35,772.00 and to allow for the addition of new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in the amount of $169,224.00; 2.2 Authorize the annual expenditure of $1,397,340.00 for landscape maintenance services for medians, facilities, sports parks, north slopes, south slopes, and new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas, and authorize the City Manager to approve a 10% contingency for extra work items in the amount of $139,734.00. R:\Minutes,csd\121404 3 First Amendment to the Midori Gardens. Inc. - Maintenance Services Contract RECOMMENDATION: 3,1 Approve the First Amendment to the contract with Midori Gardens, Inc. to provide a 3% Consumer Price Index (CPI) price increase in the amount of $10,800.00 and to allow for the addition of new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas in the amount of $40,800.00; 3.2 Authorize the annual expenditure of $411,600.00 for landscape maintenance services for neighborhood parks and new and supplemental landscape maintenance service areas, and approve 10% contingency for extra work items in the amount of $41,160.00. MOTION: Director Naggar moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3. The motion was seconded by Director Comerchero and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional comments. DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT No additional comment. GENERAL MANAGER'S REPORT General Manager Nelson commended the Community Services Department staff on its outstanding efforts with regard to the Holiday Parade as well as the Public Works Department, Police Department, and the Code Enforcement Division. President Washington echoed those comments including the Fire Department who transported Santa. , BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No additional comments. R:lMinutes,csd\ 121404 2 ADJOURNMENT At 7:11 P.M., the Temecula Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 11, 2005, at 7:00 P.M., City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/District Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes,csd\121404 3 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DECEMBER 14, 2004 A regular meeting of the City of Temecula Redevelopment Agency was called to order at 7:11 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, and Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AGENCY MEMBERS Naggar, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Comerchero ABSENT: 0 AGENCY MEMBERS: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of December 7, 2004. 2 Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year ended June 30. 2004 RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Receive and file the Temecula Redevelopment Agency Component Unit Financial Statements for Fiscal Year ended June 30, 2004. 3 Award the Construction Contract for Proiect No. PW02-20 - Old Town Southern Gatewav Landscapina RECOMMENDATION: 3.1 Reject the bid proposal submitted by Pete & Sons Construction, Inc. for Project No. PW02-20 - Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping; 3.2 Award a construction contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of $351,930.50 and authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract; 3,3 Award a maintenance contract for Project No. PW02-20 Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping to International Pavement Solutions in the amount of $3,600.00 and authorize the Agency Chairman to execute the contract; R:lMinutes,rda\121404 3.4 Authorize the Executive Director to approve change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $35,553.05 which is equal to 10% of the combined contract amount; 3,5 Transfer $40,000.00 from the Escallier House Relocation to the Old Town Southern Gateway Landscaping project construction account no. 280-190-833- 5804. MOTION: Agency Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item Nos. 1 - 3. The motion was seconded by Agency Member Washington and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. DEPARTMENTAL REPORT No additional comment. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No additional comment. AGENCY MEMBERS' REPORTS No additional comment. ADJOURNMENT At 7:12 P.M., the Temecula Redevelopment Agency meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, January 11, 2005, in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, California. Ron Roberts, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL] R:\Minutes, rdal 121404 2 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ITEM 1 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECEMBER 7, 2004 ,An adjourned regular meeting of the City of Temecula Public Financing Authority was called to order at 8:12 P.M., in the City Council Chambers, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula. ROLL CALL PRESENT: 5 AUTHORITY MEMBERS: Comerchero, Roberts, Stone, Washington, and Naggar ABSENT: o AUTHORITY MEMBER: None Also present were Executive Director Nelson, City Attorney Thorson, and City Clerk Jones. PUBLIC COMMENTS No input. CONSENT CALENDAR 1 Minutes RECOMMENDATION: 1.1 Approve the minutes of November 23, 2004 MOTION: Authority Member Stone moved to approve Consent Calendar Item NO.1. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Roberts and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. PUBLIC HEARING 2 Public Hearinas reaardina formation of Communitv Facilities District No. 03-02 (RoriDauah Ranch) RECOMMENDATION: 2.1 Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 04-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MAKING FINDINGS OF COMPLEXITY OF PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) Finance Director Roberts reviewed the staff report (as per agenda material), commenting on the recommended continuance of this public hearing to January 11, 2005. R:IMinutes,tpfal120704 MOTION: Authority Member Comerchero moved to approve the staff recommendation. The motion was seconded by Authority Member Stone and electronic vote reflected unanimous approval. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT No comment. BOARD OF DIRECTORS' REPORTS No comments. ADJOURNMENT At 8:15 P.M., the Temecula Public Financing Authority meeting was formally adjourned. Michael S. Naggar, Chairman ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Agency Secretary [SEAL) R:\Minutes,tpfa\ 120704 2 ITEM 2 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIR.OF FINANCE~ CITY MANAGER ~ CITY OF TEMECULA and TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT and TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council/Board of Directors of the TCSD/Board of Directors of the Public Financing Authority FROM: City Manager/Executive Director DATE: January 11 , 2005 SUBJECT: Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) RECOMMENDATION: 1. That the City Council hold a public hearing regarding the proposed bond financing by the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) of various public improvements and adopt the resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02 RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT, AND APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR LONG VALLEY WASH RECREATIONAL TRAILS - RORIPAUGH RANCH 2. That the Temecula Community Services District adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - RORIPAUGH RANCH 3. That the Public Financing Authority hold the continued public hearings regarding the formation of the proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD"), the levy of special taxes in the CFD, and the issuance of bonds by the Public Financing Authority for the CFD, and adopt the resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) -2- 4. That the Public Financing Authority hold an election regarding the CFD, and adopt the resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION, AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02 5. That the Public Financing Authority have the first reading of the ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 05- AN ORDINANCE OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) BACKGROUND: Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company (the "Landowner") has requested that the Authority form a community facilities district to (i) assist in the fuhding of various public improvements necessitated by the constrUction of the 'Roripaugh Ranch '" subdivision or otherwise satisfying obligations arising from the development, and'(ii) eliminate an, existing County special assessment lien on property in the proposed community facilities' , , , "district. . ';.'.;; ,On August 24, 2004 the Authority adopted two resolutions of intention related to ,the formation of a community facilities district ("CFD"). The two resolutions of intention specified the facilities eligible to be financed by the CFD, set forth a' rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the CFD, and expressed the intention of the Authority to incur bonded indebtedness , for the CFD. After the adoption of the resolutions of intention it was determined that the facilities eligible to be funded by the CFD should have included improvements to SR-79. The Landowner has agreed that the Authority may apply ten percent to any net CFD bond proceeds in excess of $42,000,000 to improvements designated by the Authority, and the City expressed its intent to use any of such funds applied to offset the cost of improvements to SR-79. On September 28, 2004, the Authority adopted a resolution (the "Amending Resolution") amending the two resolutions of intention for the CFD to add improvements to SR-79 to the list of facilities eligible to be funded by the CFD. The Amending Resolution also rescheduled the public hearings regarding the CFD to occur on November 9, 2004. On November 9, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Authority opened the public hearings and continued them to November 23, 2004. On November 23, 2004, the Board of Directors opened the continued public hearings and again continued the public hearings to December 7, 2004. On December 7, 2004, the Authority adopted a resolution making a finding that the CFD was complex, and continued the public hearings to January 11, 2005. The City has published a notice of public hearing for January 11, 2005, with respect to yet another, different public hearing that the City Council must hold under applicable State law for the Authority to be able to issue bonds for the CFD. The hearing is to allow the public to -3- provide testimony on the public purposes of the Authority's planned issuance of bonds for the CFD to finance public improvements. In addition to the public hearing that must be held by the City Council prior to the issuance of bonds for the CFD, State law also requires that the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Eastern Municipal Water District (the "EMWD"), the County of Riverside (the "County") and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the "RCFCD") enter into joint community facilities agreements with the Authority recognizing that some of the improvements to be financed by the CFD will be owned by the City, the TCSD, EMWD, the County or RCFCD. Five joint community facilities agreements have been drafted, and Staff recommends that the agreements to which the City or the TCSD are parties be approved by the City Council and the TCSD, respectively, and immediately be executed by the City, the TCSD and the Authority so that the formation of the CFD can proceed. In addition to meeting State statutory requirements, the agreement to be executed by the City provides that the City will assist the Authority in connection with the use of bond proceeds to acquire public improvements. The joint community facilities agreement to which the RCFCD, the City, the Authority, and the Landowner are parties requires the construction of certain flood control improvements, and pursuant to a license agreement between the City and the RCFCD (the "License Agreement"), the City may utilize certain flood control channel right of way for recreational uses and the City agrees to assume maintenance responsibilities and liability for such uses. In recognition of the , benefit of the right of way to the adjacent homes, the City has caused to be prepared a Maintenance" Agreement for Long Valley Wash Recreational Trails (the "Maintenance "'Agreement") obligating the Landowner and the homeowners' assOciation with respect to certain maintenance arid insurance requirements related to such land, and Staff recommends that the' "City Council approve and authorize the execution by the City of ihe Maintenance Agreement. As stated above, the public hearings by the Authority called pursuant to the resolutions of intention have been continued to January 11,2005. The Board of Directors of the Authority will hold the Authority public hearings concurrently. At the hearings, the testimony of all interested persons or taxpayers for or against the establishment of the CFD, the extent of the CFD, the lien tobe eliminated and the facilities to be financed by the CFD and the issuance of bonds for the CFD must be heard. Any person interested is authorized to file a protest in writing. As the land proposed to be included in the CFD is all owned by Ashby USA, LLC and certain other entities that have submitted petitions to the Authority requesting the formation of the CFD, and there are no known registered voters residing in the proposed CFD, only Ashby USA, LLC and such other landowner entities have legal standing to formally protest the formation or any particular aspect of the CFD. A report has been filed by the Director of Public Works of the City with the Authority Secretary, as required by the resolutions of intention, indicating the proposed boundaries of the CFD, the facilities to be funded by the CFD, the lien to be eliminated by the CFD, and the estimated costs thereof, Also, it should be noted that changes have been made to the rate and method of app6rtionment of special taxes for the CFD as a result of a zoning change affecting planning area 10 of the Roripaugh Ranch development. The report and the changes will be discussed by Staff prior to the public hearings. Following the closing of the public hearings, the property owners in the CFD have requested in their petitions to the Authority that the Authority take the actions necessary to officially form the CFD, to authorize the levy of special taxes in the CFD and to authorize the incurrence of bonded indebtedness by the CFD. Staff recommends that the Authority adopt resolutions of -4- formation and of necessity to incur bonded indebtedness, and the resolution calling a special election of the landowners in the CFD. Ballots for the election have already been delivered to the property owners in the CFD, and are expected to have been returned to the City Clerk, acting as Secretary of the Authority, prior to January 11th. By law, each property owner is given one vote for each acre of land or portion thereof that it owns within the boundaries of the CFD. As stated above, the only eligible voters are the owners of the land within the boundaries of the CFD, as such boundaries are indicated on the boundary map for the CFD on file with the Authority Secretary. The City Clerk, as Secretary to the Authority, will be requested to canvass the election immediately after adoption of the resolution calling the election. If two thirds or more of the votes cast are in favor of the CFD, the Authority is then requested to adopt a resolution declaring the results of the election, and providing for the recording of a notice of special tax lien with the County Recorder. The notice provides all future property owners in the Roripaugh Ranch development with knowledge of the existence of the Authority's special taxing powers. The Authority is then requested to have the first reading of an ordinance levying special taxes. The ordinance permits special taxes to be levied only on property located in the CFD. It is expected that special taxes will be levied to pay debt service on bonds proposed to be issued for the CFD, and to pay for the costs of administering the CFD. Staff expects that a resolution authorizing the issuance of the bonds and approving the related legal documents will be 'presented to the,Authority in late January or February of 2005. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: That the City Council hold the public hearing on the issuance of bonds by the Authority for the CFD, and adopt the resolutions approving the bond issue, the joint community facilities agreements to which the City is a party and the Maintenance Agreement. That theTCSD adopt the resolution approving the jointcommunity facilities agreement to which the TCSD is a party. That the City, the TCSD and the Authority execute the applicable joint community facilities agreements. That the Authority hold the public hearings on the CFD and adopt resolutions of formation of the CFD, of necessity to incur indebtedness of the CFD and calling a special election on the CFD. That the special election be held and canvassed. That the Authority adopt a resolution canvassing the election, and have the first reading of an ordinance levying the special taxes in the CFD. FISCAL IMPACT: The CFD will be authorized to levy special taxes to repay its indebtedness, and to pay the annual costs of administration of the CFD, The City will in no way be liable for the repayment of any bonds issued by the Authority for the CFD or any other costs of administrating the CFD. The CFD will only be authorized to levy the special taxes on land included within the boundaries of the CFD. Obligations of the City to RCFCD under the License Agreement will be assumed by the Landowner and/or the Roripaugh Ranch Homeowners' Association under the provisions of the Maintenance Agreement. Attachments: Resolutions (7) Ordinance Community Facilities District Report Joint Community Facilities Agreements (5) Maintenance Agreement for Long Valley Wash Recreational Trails Notice of Special Tax Lien .5- COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT " TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT REPORT CONTENTS Introduction A. Description of Facilities and Prior Lien B. Proposed Boundaries of the Community Facilities District C. Cost Estimate Exhibit A - Description of the Proposed Facilities and Prior Lien Exhibit B - Cost Estimate TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) INTRODUCTION. The Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors") of the Ternecula Public Financing Authority (the" Authority") did, pursuant to the provisions of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Law"), on August 24, 2004, adopt Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 entitled, "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein - Roripaugh Ranch 03-02" (the "Resolution of Intention"). In the Resolution of Intention, the Board of Directors expressly ordered the preparation of a written Community Facilities District Report (the "Report"), for the proposed Temecula Public Financim: Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "District!i). TIle Resolution of Intention ordering the Report did direct that the Report generally contain the following: 1. A brief description of the facilities eligible to be funded by the District, and of the fixed special assessment lien to be eliminated by the District; and 2. An estimate of the fair and reasonable cost of providing the facilities, and of eliminating the fixed special assessment lien, including the incidental expenses in connection therewith, including the costs of the proposed bond financing, any Authority or City of Temecula administrative costs and all other related costs. For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention for the District, as previously adopted by the Board of Directors. NOW, THEREFORE, I, the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula, do hereby submit the following data: A. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES AND PRIOR LIEN. A general description of the facilities that the Authority has determined to be eligible to be funded by the District, and of the fixed special assessment lien to be eliminated by the District, are as shown in Exhibit "A" attachea hereto and hereby made a part hereof. B. PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT. The proposed boundaries of the District are those properties and parcels in which special taxes may be levied to pay for the costs and expenses of the facilities and of the elimination of the fixed special assessment lien. The proposed boundaries of the District are described in the map of the D;str;ct recorded on August 31, 2004, in Book 58 on Page 51 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Rivers;de (instrument no. 2004-0691181), a copy of which map;s on file with the Secretary. -1- C. COST ESTIMATE. The cost estimate for the financing of the facilities and the defeasance of the bonds is set forth in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Dated: January 5, 2005 ,,J _JAIL By: Bill Hughes, Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula -2- EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTIIORITY COMMUNITY FACILmES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ELIGIBLE TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT AND PRIOR LIEN TO BE ELIMINATED BY THE DISTRICT FACILITIES The District may finance all or part of the costs of the following: 1. Murrieta Hot Springs Road Murrieta Hot Springs Road (MHSR) from the Westerly Boundary Line of Tract 29661 (existing end of pavement) to Butterfield Stage Road: Improvements include grading for full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, traffic signal(s) landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete MHSR. 2. Butterfield Stage Road Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from the Northerly tract boundary to Rancho California Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewall<, street lights, traffic signal(s), signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, bridges over Santa Gertrudis Creek, and Long Valley Channel, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road. 3. Nicolas Road 3a Nicolas Road BSR to the Easterly Metropolitan Water District (MWD) R1W: Improvements include grading right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, underground sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. 3b Nicolas Road from the Easterly MWD RIW to Liefer Road including construction of Calle Garisol realignment to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading partial right-of-way (40' travel way) with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, utility relocations, traffic detour, split rail fence, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, sewer, storm drain, bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek (including channel lining and transition structure to bridge), access road, exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. 3c Nicolas Road Sewer Pipeline from Liefer Road to Joseph Road: Improvements include installing a 15" main line sewer including street re-pavement, traffic detour and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road Sewer pipeline. A-I 3d Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road intersection signalization: Improvements include signalization of intersection, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the signalization. 3e Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection widening and signal modification: Improvements include modifications to existing traffic signal, storm drain, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, bus turn-out, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the intersection and signal modifications. 4. Calle Chapos Calle Chapos from BSR to Walcott Lane: Improvements include grading half right-of-way width plus twelve feet with 2:1 slopes, paving, AC dike, storm drain and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Calle Chapos. 5. Long Valley Channel Long Valley Channel from the Westerly R/W of BSR to the Easterly Project Boundary: Improvements include grading of channel, flow-by detention basin, construction of drop structures, trapezoidal channel lining, transition structures to Butterfield Stage Road Bridge, rip-rap, grading and paving of access roads, fencing, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Long Valley Channel. 6. Santa Gertrudis Creek Santa Gertrudis Creek from the Habitat Area to the exit channel at MWD R/W: Improvements include a flow-by detention basin, headwalls, trapezoidal channel lining and transition structures; grading, fencing and paving for access roads; desilting and detention basins, rip-rap protection, rip-rap dissipaters, berms, grading of exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Santa Gertrudis Creek. 7, Environmental Mitigation Mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements: Creation of 8.2 acres of habitat within open space to include grading, access road, electrical service, irrigation, plant and seed installation and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete resource agency conditioned environmental mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements. 8. Sports Park Sports Park at the SE corner of the intersection of North Loop Road and Butterfield Stage Road: Construct 20ic-acre Sports Park including grading, parking, building, lighting landscaping, irrigation, playing fields, basketball courts, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Sports Park. A-2 9. Fire Station Site Grading Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station site grading Improvements include site grading and other appurtenant improvements necessary to provide a rough graded fire station site. 10. North Loop Road North Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (Public Section only): Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, North Loop Road Bridge and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the North Loop Road East of BSR. 11. South Loop Road South Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (Public Section only): Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the South Loop Road East of BSR. 12. Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street) Roripaugh Valley Road Grading and Street Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Roripaugh Valley Road between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road. 13. Fiesta Ranch Road ( B Street) Fiesta Ranch Road Grading and Street Improvements from Roripaugh Valley Road to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Fiesta Ranch Road between Roripaugh Valley Road and Nicolas Road. 14. Fire Station and Fire Apparatus Fire Station Construction and Fire Truck Purchase: Improvements include the acquisition of land for and construction of a fire station to be located at the Southeast comer of Butterfield Stage Road and the South Loop Road, and to consist of a building of approximately 9,100 square feet. Also, the equipping of the fire station, including furniture and fixtures, and the acquisition of a fire truck and other fire fighting apparatus. A-3 15, Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park at the SW comer of the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street): Construct S.l-acre Neighborhood Park including grading, parking, restroom building, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, open grass area, basketball court, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (S) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Neighborhood Park. 16. SR-79 Improvements Improvements include right-of-way acquisition, grading to accommodate road widening, pavin~, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal(s), signing and stnping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete improvements to SR-79 within the City of Temecula City limits. PRIOR LIEN The District may fund amounts necessary to eliminate all or a portion of the lien imposed by the County of Riverside Assessment District No. 161 on the real property within the District. OTHER The District may also finance any of the following: 1. Bond related expenses, including underwriter's discount, reserve fund, capitalized interest, bond and disclosure counsel and all other incidental expenses. 2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and any bonded indebtedness of the District. 3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the District advanced by the Authority, the City or any related entity, or any landowner or developer within the District, as well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority or any related entity, or any landowner or developer within the District, for facilities, fees or other purposes or costs of the District A-4 ." EXHIBIT B TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILmES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) FACILmES AND LIEN ELIMINATION COST ESTIMATE 1. ACQUISmON & CONSTRUCTION OF FACILmES 2. INCIDENTALS (a) Bond Reserve Fund (b) Bond Discount/Underwriter Compensation (c) Capitalized Interest (d) Other Costs of Issuance (e) First Year Administration Costs 3. COST TO PREPAY FIXED ASSESSMENT LIEN 4. CONTINGENCIES TOTAL BOND AMOUNT NEEDED B-1 $ 45,108,591 3,647,182 1,046,600 1,952,627 515,000 60,000 1,000,000 1.670.000 $ 55,000,000 RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING FINDINGS WITH RESPECT TO AND APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02 WHEREAS, the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Temecula have heretofore entered into a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement establishing the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for the purpose, among others, of issuing its bonds to finance public capital improvements; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Authority intends to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD"), and to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") to finance various public improvements within or near the City of Temecula (the "Improvements") and the elimination of a fixed special assessment lien on property in the CFD (the "Prior Lien"); and WHEREAS, the City Council has on this date held a duly noticed public hearing on the financing of the Improvements and the elimination of the Prior Lien with the proceeds of the Bonds, as required by Section 6586.5(a) of the California Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council now desires to make a finding of significant public benefit, pursuant to Section 6586.5(a)(2) of the California Government Code, and to approve of the financing of the Improvements and the elimination of the Prior Lien with the proceeds of the Bonds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Findinqs and Determinations. The City Council hereby finds that significant public benefits will arise from the financing of the Improvements and the elimination of the Prior Lien with the proceeds of the Bonds, in accordance with Section 6586 of the California Government Code. Section 2. Approval of Financinq. The City Council hereby approves the financing of the Improvements and the elimination of the Prior Lien with the proceeds of the Bonds, and the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority for the CFD. Section 3. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect from and after the date of its passage and adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, bX the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting of the City Council held on the 11' day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 05- _ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11'h day of January, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk -2- RESOLUTION NO. 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACQUISITION AGREEMENT, AND APPROVING MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR LONG VALLEY WASH RECREATIONAL TRAILS - RORIPAUGH RANCH WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority intends to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") in order to finance costs of public improvements (the "Improvements") to be constructed within or near the City of Temecula (the "City") and the elimination of a prior fixed assessment lien, as described in the proceedings to form the CFD; and WHEREAS, in order to enable the CFD to finance the Improvements, Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the City and the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement prior to the formation of the CFD with respect to the portion of the Improvements to be owned or operated by the City for the CFD; and WHEREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement - City, by and between the City and the Authority relating to the Improvements to be owned or operated by the City (the "Joint Community Facilities Agreement - City") has been filed with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement by and among the City, the Authority, Ashby USA, LLC ("Ashby") and the County of Riverside (the "County") relating to certain street improvements eligible to be funded by the CFD (the "County JCFA"), a form of joint community facilities agreement by and among the City, the Authority, the County, Ashby and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District relating to certain flood control facilities eligible to be funded by the CFD (the "Flood Control JCFA," and, together with the County JCFA, and the Joint Community Facilities Agreement - City, being referred to herein collectively as the "Joint Community Facilities Agreements") have been filed with the City Clerk; and WHEREAS, there has been prepared a Maintenance Agreement for Long Valley Wash Recreational Trails among the Homeowner's Association for Roripaugh Ranch, Ashby and the City (the "Maintenance Agreement") relating to obligation to maintain certain land referenced in the Flood Control JCFA; and WHEREAS, the City Council, with the assistance of City staff, has reviewed the Joint Community Facilities Agreements and the Maintenance Agreement, and the City Council now desires to approve the Joint Community Facilities Agreements and the Maintenance Agreement and direct their execution and delivery; and WHEREAS, the Authority expects to enter into an Acquisition Agreement (the "Acquisition Agreemenf') with Ashby, whereby Ashby will construct some of the Improvements to be acquired with the proceeds of the Bonds; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement will involve actions by the Director of Public Works of the City and certain other City officials, and the City Council now desires to authorize City officials to assist in the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement the current form of which has been reviewed by and is on file with the Director of Public Works. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Temecula as follows: Section 1. Approval of Joint Community Facilities Aqreements. The City Council hereby approves the Joint Community Facilities Agreements in the respective forms on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute and deliver, and the City Clerk to attest, the Joint Community Facilities Agreements in such forms together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Mayor of the Joint Community Facilities Agreements. The City Council hereby declares that the Joint Community Facilities Agreements will be beneficial to the residents residing within the boundaries of the City. Section 2. Approval of Maintenance Aqreement. The City Council hereby approves the Maintenance Agreement in the form on file with the City Clerk, and hereby authorizes and directs the Mayor to execute and deliver, and the City Clerk to attest, the Maintenance Agreement in such form together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the City Manager upon consultation with the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the Mayor of the Maintenance Agreement. Section 3. Approval of Assistance Under Acquisition Aqreement. The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works and all other appropriate officials of the City to assist the Authority in the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement, and to perform those functions described in the Acquisition Agreement as to be performed by officials of the City. Section 4. Official Actions. The Mayor, City Manager, Director of Finance, the Director of Public Works and City Clerk, and all other officers of the City, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder to implement the Joint Community Facilities Agreements and the Acquisition Agreement, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, docurnents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution, the Joint Cornmunity Facilities Agreements and the Acquisition Agreement. -2- Section 5. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall take effect upon its ad6ption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 05-_ was duly adopted at a regular rneeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following roll call vote: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: ABSENT: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk -3- JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT CITY JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT - CITY TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (the" Agreement"), dated for convenience as of January 1, 2005, is by and between the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and the City of Temecula (the "Participating Agency"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Authority is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the" Act"), and the Authority intends to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") in order to finance various public improvements to be acquired and constructed in the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds may include the improvements described in Attachment A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Attachment is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Participating Agency will own and operate the Improvements if they comply with the standards and have been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS, all or a portion of the Improvements are to be constructed by Ashby USA, LLC, an owner of land in the CFD or an affiliate or designee thereof (the "Developer"), and the Authority expects to enter into an Acquisition Agreement with the Developer (the" Acquisition Agreement") whereby the Authority will use proceeds of the Bonds to acquire improvements from the Developer and to reimburse the Developer for all or a portion of the costs of other improvements; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement will involve actions by officials of the Participating Agency, and the Participating Agency is willing to provide the services of its officials as necessary to implement the provisions of the Acquisition Agreement; and WHEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which Improvements are to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316.2 of the Act and to memorialize their understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds, the Improvements and the Acquisition Agreement, all as more particularly set forth below. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows; Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. The Authority intends to reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an amount necessary to finance a portion of the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and construction of the Improvements. Said amount, together with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in an account within the Improvement Fund established for the CFD (the "Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the applicable improvement area of the CFD, and such amount shall in no way be pledged as security for the Bonds. Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Any costs of the Improvements listed as items 1 through and including 9 in Attachment A hereto in excess of the proceeds of the Bonds available to pay such costs will be paid by or on behalf of a landowner in the CFD. Section 2. Construction of Improvements. The Improvements have been or will be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency. The Participating Agency shall not have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in connection with the Improvements; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities in respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements once the Participating Agency accepts title to and control over the Improvements. To the extent that the Participating Agency incurs expenses incident to reviewing and approving design plans and specifications, conducting construction field inspections and otherwise in connection with the design, construction and acceptance of the Improvements, such expenses may be reimbursed to the Participating Agency upon presentation of invoices as to the nature and amount of such costs and expenses, from available amounts in the Improvement Fund, or if there are no such available funds, then from one of the owners of the land in the CFD (as may be required in any applicable subdivision improvement agreements pertaining thereto) or from any other legally available funds. Section 3. Inspection and Acceptance: Use of Bond Funds. The Participating Agency shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion of construction of the Improvements to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and responsibility for operation of the Improvements conditioned upon the passage to the Participating Agency of fee title clear of all encumbrances and easements not otherwise acceptable to the Participating Agency in its sole discretion. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the -2- satisfaction of the Participating Agency. The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any of the Improvements. Section 4. Assistance with Acquisition Agreement. The Participating Agency hereby agrees to assist the Authority in connection with the implementation of the Acquisition Agreement by making its Director of Public Works and other officials available for the purposes, on the terms and as otherwise provided for in the Acquisition Agreement with respect to any actions to be performed by Participating Agency officials under the Acquisition Agreement. Section 5. Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund and described in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable hereunder. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the Improvements shall be to inspect and accept the Improvements as described above. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to acceptance by the Participating Agency. If, for any reason whatsoever, there are insufficient funds to complete the Improvements or any portion thereof, the Participating Agency shall have no obligation under this Agreement to fund any such shortfall. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the Acquisition Agreement shall be to make available officials of the Participating Agency specifically referenced in, and for the tasks specifically to be undertaken by such officials under the terms of, the Acquisition Agreement. If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the commencement of an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations. Section 6. Termination. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the first series of the Bonds are not issued by December 31, 2005. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements by the Participating Agency. Section 7. Partial Invalidity. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein. Section 9. Execution in Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. -3- * * * * * * * * * * IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature below. CITY OF TEMECULA (the "Participating Agency") Date of Execution; January 11, 2005 By; Mayor A ttes t: By: City Clerk TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (the "Authority") Date of Execution; January 11, 2005 By: Executive Director -4- ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED BY TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) WHICH ARE TO BE OWNED, OPERATED OR PROVIDED, AS APPLICABLE, BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA 1. Murrieta Hot Springs Road Murrieta Hot Springs Road (MHSR) from the Westerly Boundary Line of Tract 29661 (existing end of pavement) to Butterfield Stage Road: Improvements include grading for full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, signing and striping, traffic signal(s) landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete MHSR. 2. Butterfield Stage Road Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from the Northerly tract boundary to Southerly tract boundary: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, traffic signal(s), signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, bridges over Santa Gertrudis Creek, and Long Valley Channel, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road. Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from the Southerly tract boundary to Rancho California Road: Improvements include grading westerly _ right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, traffic signal(s), signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road. 3. Nicolas Road Nicolas Road BSR to the Easterly Metropolitan Water District (MWD) R/W: Improvements include grading right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. A-I Nicolas Road from the Easterly MWD R/W to Liefer Road including construction of Calle Garisol realignment to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading partial right-of-way (40' travel way) with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, sewer, storm drain, bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road intersection signalization: Improvements include signalization of intersection, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the signalization. Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection widening and signal modification: Improvements include modifications to existing traffic signal, storm drain, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, bus turn-out, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the intersection and signal modifications outside of the Caltrans right of way. 4. Calle Chapos Calle Chap os from BSR to Walcott Lane: Improvements include grading half right-of-way width plus twelve feet with 2:1 slopes, paving, AC dike, storm drain and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Calle Chapos. 5. Environmental Mitigation Mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements: Creation of 8.2 acres of habitat within open space to include grading, access road, electrical service, irrigation, plant and seed installation and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete resource agency conditioned environmental mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements. 6. North Loop Road North Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (public section only): Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, North Loop Road Bridge and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the North Loop Road East of BSR. A-2 7. South Loop Road South Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (public section only): Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the South Loop Road East of BSR. 8. Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street) Roripaugh Valley Road Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road: from Murrieta Hot Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Roripaugh Valley Road between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road. 9. Fiesta Ranch Road ( B Street) Fiesta Ranch Road from Roripaugh Valley Road to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Fiesta Ranch Road between Roripaugh Valley Road and Nicolas Road. 10. Fire Station and Fire Apparatus Improvements include the acquisition of land for and construction of a fire station to be located at S/E corner of Butterfield Stage Road and the South Loop Road, which will consist of a building of approximately 9,100 square feet. Also, the equipping of the fire station, including furniture and fixtures, and the acquisition of a fire truck and other fire fighting apparatus. A-3 JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT COUNTY: STREET IMPROVEMENTS "" ( / JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (Street Improvements) by and among COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE and CITY OF TEMECULA and TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY and ASHBY USA, LLC a California limited liability company Dated as of November 1,2004 Relating to: Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1. Definitions............................................................................................ ...................... 5 ARTICLE II CONDITIONS PRECEDENT Section 2.1. Formation Proceedings .............................................................................................. 9 ARTICLE III ACQUISITION OF THE COUNTY FACILITIES Section 3.1. Acquisiton of County Facilties ................................................................................ 10 Section 3.2. Determination ofthe Purchase Price........................................................................ 10 Section 3.3. Dedication of Property and Easements to County................................................... 11 Section 3.4. Modifications to Acquisition Costs ......................................................................... 12 Section 3.5. Application of Realized Savings.............................................................................. 12 ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTY FACILITIES Section 4.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans .......................................................................... 13 Section 4.2. Duty of Developer to Construct............................................................................... 13 Section 4.3. Bid and Construction Requirements ........................................................................ 13 Section 4.4. Licenses and Regulatory Permits .............................................................................15 Section 4.5. NPDES Compliance... ....................................... .... ................................................... 15 Section 4.6.Cal/OSHA, Confined Space Entry............................................................................ 17 Section 4.7. Notice of Intent to Conunence Construction ...........................................................17 Section 4.8. Bonding Requirements......... ........................ ......... ...... .......................... ................... 18 Section 4.9. Additional Conditions to be Satisfied during Construction..................................... 18 Section 4.10. Inspection, Completion of Construction ................................................................ 18 Section 4.11. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties ................................................................... 19 Section 4.12. Maintenance Deposits by the Developer for Energizing Street Lights and Maintenance of Retention Wall..................................................................... 19 Section 4.13. Insurance Requirements ......................................................................................... 20 Section 4.14. Ownership ofthe Facilities .................................................................................... 22 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS; INDEMNIFICATION Section 5.1. Representations, Warranties and Covenants ofthe Developer. ............................... 23 Section 5.2. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Authority................................. 24 Section 5.3. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the County.................................... 25 Section 5.4. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the City.......................................... 25 Section 5.6. The Developer Indemnification ............................................................................... 27 ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS Section 6.1. The Developer as Independent Contractors ............................................................. 28 Section 6.2. Other Agreements .................................................................................................... 28 Section 6.3. Binding on Successors and Assigns......................................................................... 28 Section 6.4. Amendments ......................... .......................... ....... ...... ............................................ 28 Section 6.5 . Waivers ........... ..... ................................................ .............................. ...................... 29 Section 6.6. No Third Party Beneficiaries ................................................................................... 29 . Section 6.7. Notices ....................... ................................... ........................................................... 29 Section 6.8. Jurisdiction and Venue.............................................................................................30 Section 6.9. Attorney's Fees ................... ...................... ............ ..... ... ............................................ 30 Section 6.10. Governing Law ......................................................................................................30 Section 6.11. Usage of Words.......................................................................:.... .......................... 30 Section 6.12. Counterparts .... ....... ....................................... .................... ............................ ......... 30 Section 6.13. Interpretation... ........................ ............... .............. ............. ....... ............ .................. 30 Section 6.14. Designation of Party Representative...................................................................... 31 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP OF CFD NO. 03-02....................................... A-I EXHIBIT B COUNTY IMPROVEMENTS - DIAGRAM, DESCRIPTION AND ACQUISITION COSTS................................................................................B-l EXHIBIT C FORM OF SUMMARY OF BIDS RECEIVED ...................................................C-l EXHIBIT D FORM OF PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS ................................. D-l EXHIBIT E FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST ......................................................................E-l CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (this "Joint Community Facilities Agreement") is made and entered into as of November 1, 2004, by and among the County of Riverside, a public subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter, the "County"), the City of Temecula, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter, the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 5, Division 5 of Title 1 of the California Government Code (hereinafter, the "Authority"), and Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company (hereinafter, the "Developer"). RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to a petition presented to the Authority executed by the Developer who owns more than ten percent (10%) of approximately 805 vacant acres comprising Tract Map Nos. 29353-1, 29353-2 and 29353-3 (collectively, the "Property") that are located within the boundaries of the City and are commonly referred to as "Roripaugh Ranch," the Board of Directors of the Authority (the "Legislative Body") has initiated proceedings to form a community facilities district that is to be identified as Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 ("Roripaugh Ranch") (the "Community Facilities District") by the adoption of its Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 on August 24, 2004, as amended by Resolution No. TPFA 04-10 (the "Resolution of Intention"), under the authority of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the" Act") (commencing with Section 53311 of the California. Government Code (the "Code")). WHEREAS, the Developer is the master developer of the Property, as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, that will allow for the construction of approximately 2,000 residential units, approximately 15 acres of related commercial development, school and park sites, and construction of a fire station all within the boundaries or the vicinity of the Community Facilities District. WHEREAS, the Developer has requested and proposed that the Community Facilities District be formed for the purpose of providing the means of financing the construction and/or acquisition of certain streets, related drainage improvements, and park facilities to be owned and maintained by the City, certain street and related drainage improvements to owned and maintained by the County (the "County Facilities") certain flood control and storm water drainage facilities to be owned and maintained by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and certain water and sewer improvements to be owned and maintained by Eastern Municipal Water District (the "EMWD Improvements"). The County Facilities are to be owned, operated and maintained by the County upon their acceptance by the County. The County Facilities are CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 2 diagramed in concept, described and their estimated acquisition costs are stated in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, Section 53313.5 of the Code provides that a community facilities district may only finance the purchase of facilities whose construction has been completed, as determined by the legislative body of the community facilities district, before the resolution of formation to establish the community facilities district is adopted pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Code, except that a community facilities district may finance the purchase of facilities completed after the adoption of a resolution of formation if the facility is constructed as if it had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, a local public agency. WHEREAS, alternatively, Section 53314.9 of the Code provides that at any time either before or after the formation of a community facilities district, the legislative body may accept advances of funds or work in-kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or entities, and may provide, by resolution, for the use of those funds or that work in-kind for any authorized purpose, under all of the following conditions: (a) the proposal to repay the funds or the value or cost of the work in-kind, whichever is less, is included in both the resolution of intention to establish the community facilities district adopted pursuant to Section 53321 of the Code and in the resolution to establish the community facilities district pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Code, (b) any proposed special tax is approved by the qualified electors of the community facilities district pursuant to the Act, and (c) any work in-kind accepted pursuant to Section 53314.9 of the Code shall have been performed or constructed as if the work had been performed or constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority, of a local public agency. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Board of Directors has adopted the Resolution of Intention stating that it is the intention of the Authority to cause the proposed Community Facilities District to be established, and if established, to reimburse the Developer all, or a portion, of the funds or value or cost of the work in-kind, whichever is less, without interest, provided all of the conditions of Section 53314.9 of the Code are satisfied and that such reimbursement shall only be from the proceeds of special tax bonds, if any are sold and issued by the proposed Community Facilities District. WHEREAS, the Act provides that the proposed Community Facilities District may finance the County Facilities only pursuant to a joint community facilities agreement adopted pursuant to Sections 53316.2, 53316.4 and 53316.6 of the Code. WHEREAS, the County, the City, the Authority and the Developer desire to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, as required by the aforementioned sections of the Code and prior to the adoption by the Board of Directors of the resolution establishing the Community Facilities District. The provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement are intended to apply only to the County Facilities, unless expressly stated otherwise. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 3 WHEREAS, consistent with Section 53316.2 of the Code, the Authority, the City, the Flood Control District, and the County find that the approval of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement will be beneficial to the residents of the their respective jurisdictions and to the owners of property within the Community Facilities District. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual premises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 4 ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Article I sjlall have the meaning herein specified when used in this Joint Conununity Facilities Agreement: "Acceptable Title" means title to land, or an easement therein, delivered free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments, leases, easements and encumbrances, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, except those non-monetary items which are reasonably determined by the City not to interfere with the intended use of such land or easement and therefore are not required to be cleared from title. "Acceptance Date" means, with respect to any County Facility, the date that the County Facility is accepted by the County into its maintained system and the Purchase Price therefor has been determined pursuant to the terms the this Joint Conununity Facilities Agreement. "Acquisition Agreement" means the "Acquisition Agreement" to be entered into by and between the Authority and the Developer, as originally executed or as the same may be amended from time to time in accordance with its terms "Acquisition Account" means the account by that or a similar name established within the "Improvement Fund" created by the Indenture. "Acquisition Cost" means, with respect to a County Facility, the amount specified as the Acquisition Cost for such County Facility in Exhibit B attached hereto, as the same may be modified by one or more supplements thereto entered into in accordance with Section 3.4 hereof or augmented as a result of cost savings pursuant to Section 3.5 hereof. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Conununity Facilities Act of 1982, constituting Section 53311 et seq. of the Code, as amended. "Actual Cost" means, with respect to a County Facility, an amount equal to the sum of (a) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of constructing such County Facility, including labor, material and equipment costs, (b) the Developer's actual reasonable cost of designing and preparing the Plans for such County Facility, including engineering services provided in connection with designing and preparing such Plans, (c) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of environmental evaluations required specifically for such County Facility, (d) the amount of any fees actually paid by the Developer to governmental agencies in order to obtain permits, licenses or other necessary governmental approvals and reviews for such County Facility, (e) the Developer's actual reasonable cost for professional services directly related to the construction of such County Facility, including engineering, legal, inspection, construction staking, materials testing and similar professional services, (t) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost for construction management bid administration services which shall CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 5 not exceed 5% of construction costs, (g) the Developer's actual reasonable cost of payment, performance or maintenance bonds and insurance (including any title insurance required hereby) for such County Facility, (h) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of any real property or interest therein acquired after the date on which the Community Facilities District is established pursuant to the Act for a party other than the Developer, which real property or interest therein is either necessary for the construction of such County Facility (e.g., temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc.) or is required to be conveyed with such County Facility in order to convey Acceptable Title thereto to the County, all as specified in a Payment Request that is to be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer; provided, however, that (x) no item of cost relating to a County Facility shall be included in more than one category of cost specified in clauses (a) through (h) of this definition, and (y) each item of cost shall include only amounts actually paid by the Developer to third parties and shall not include overhead or other internal expenses of the Developer, except that, if Developer employees perform construction management, bid administration or contract administration services with respect to a County Facility, the actual reasonable cost of the salaries and benefits paid by the Developer to such employees for performing such services may be included as an item of cost relating to such County Facility for the category of cost specified in clause (f) of this definition and subject to the 5% limitation specified in clause (f). "Administrator" means the Treasurer of the Authority, or her/his designee. "Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 5, Division 5 of Title I ofthe Code. "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Authority. "Board of Supervisors" means the Board of Supervisors of the County. "Bonds" means the bonds that the Community Facilities District may attempt to sell and issue in one or more series if the Proceedings are approved, a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to acquire the County Facilities. "Business Day" means a day which is not a Saturday or Sunday or a day of the year on which the County is not required or authorized to be open. "CEQA" means the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), constituting Section 21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code, as amended. "City" means the City of Temecula, an incorporated municipality. "City Engineer" means the Director of Public Works of the City, or his/her designee. "Code" means the California Government Code. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 6 "Community Facilities District" means the Temecu1a Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), a community facilities district to be organized and existing under the Code. "Construction Site" means the site on which the County Facilities are to be constructed, including off site staging areas and material storage areas. "County" means the County of Riverside, a political subdivision ofthe State, and its successors. "County Engineer" means the Director of Transportation of the County (or any successor to the responsibilities thereof if such office is no longer in existence), or his/her designee. "County Facility" or "County Facilities" means the street and related drainage improvements as shown and described in Exhibit B attached hereto and are to be owned, operated and maintained by the County. "Developer" means Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company, and its successors and assigns, acting as the master developer of infrastructure within the Community Facilities District, including but not limited to the County Facilities. "Developer's Representative" means the person or persons designated as such by the Developer in a certificate signed by the Developer and delivered to the City, the Community Facilities District, and the County, which certificate shall contain an original or specimen signature of each person so designated. "General Prevailing Wage Rates" means those rates as determined by the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations of the State. "Hazardous Material" means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, the State or the United States Government, including, without limitation, any material or substance which is (a) designated as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. S 1251 et seq. (33 U.S.C. S 1321), (b) defined as a "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. S 6901 et seq. (42 U.S.C. S 6903), (c) defined as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. S 9601 et seq., (d) petroleum, or (e) asbestos. "Indenture" means the indenture, trust agreement, resolution, fiscal agent agreement or similar instrument, regardless of title, pursuant to which bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness of the Community Facilities District have been issued and are outstanding, as originally executed or as the same may from time to time be supplemented or amended pursuant to the provisions thereof. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 7 "Joint Community Facilities Agreement" means this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, dated as of November I, 2004, by and among the County, the City, the Authority and the Developer, as originally executed or as the same may be amended from time to time in accordance with its terms. "Legislative Body" means the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, acting ex officio as the legislative body of the Community Facilities District. "Payment Request" means the document to be provided by the Developer to substantiate the Purchase Price of one or more the County Facilities, which shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit E attached hereto. "Plans" mean the plans and specifications for the County Facilities prepared or to be prepared at the direction of the Developer pursuant to Section 4.1 hereof. "Proceedings" means those proceedings to be undertaken by the Board of Directors to consider the formation of the Community Facilities District and the approval by the Board of Directors and the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District and of the authorization to levy special taxes therein pursuant to the Rate and Method and by the Legislative Body to se\1 and issue the Bonds. "Property" means the real property located within the Community Facilities District. "Purchase Price" means, subject to the provisions of Section 3.2 hereof, the lesser of the Actual Cost or the Acquisition Cost of a County Facility, allowing for the application of the provisions of Section 3.4 which provides for the modification of the Acquisition Cost and the provisions of Section 3.5 which specifies the circumstances in which additional monies may be made available to pay the Purchase Price. "Rate and Method" means the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes authorized to be levied within the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Proceedings. "State" means the State of California. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 8 ARTICLE II CONDITIONS PRECENDENT Section 2.1. Formation Proceedinl!s. The Developer has submitted to the Authority a petition requesting that the Proceedings be initiated by the Authority with regard to the formation of the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing . the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities, including the County Facilities, to authorize the levy of special taxes within the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Rate and Method and for the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance of one or more series of Bonds. Should the formation of the Community Facilities District be approved, the Legislative Body will use its best efforts to cause to be sold and issued, pursuant to the terms of the Act and Indenture, the Bonds in one or more series and a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds are intended to provide funds that will allow the Community Facilities District to finance a portion of the costs of acquiring the County Facilities. Should the Board of Directors not be able to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District and/or the Legislative Body not be able to sell and issue the first series of the Bonds within two years of the date hereof, the Authority, the City, the County, and the Developer will not be bound by the terms of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and it shall be considered null and void by the parties to it. The Developer acknowledges that the decision of the Board of Directors to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District and of the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance of the Bonds is an exercise of the legislative discretion of the Board of Directors and Legislative Body, respectively, and that the Authority may not enter into a contract or obligate either the Board of Directors or the Legislative Body to exercise its legislative discretion in a particular marmer. This Joint Commwlity Facilities Agreement does not, therefore, in any way create a contractual, legal or equitable obligation of or commitment by the Board of Directors to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District or the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance ofthe Bonds. Should the Developer elect to abandon the Proceedings, the Developer shall provide written notification of such election to the Authority, the City, and the County prior to the adoption by the Legislative Body of the Resolution authorizing the sale and issuance of the Bonds. The Board of Directors and the Legislative Body shaH have the jurisdiction to and shall be solely responsible for undertaking the Proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Act, the Indenture and the applicable provisions of the Acquisition Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 9 ARTICLE III ACQUISITION OF COUNTY FACILITIES Section 3.1. Acquisition of County Facilities. The Developer hereby agrees to transfer to the County each of the County Facilities and the Community Facilities District hereby agrees to pay the Purchase Price thereof, subject to the terms and conditions hereof and the Acquisition Agreement. Acceptable Title to any parcels on which any County Facility is constructed and for which title is not presently held by the County as well as the County Facility financed pursuant hereto shall be transferred to the County as of the Acceptance Date; provided, however, that notwithstanding such transfer, as provided in Section 4.11 hereof, the Developer shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of any County Facility until the Acceptance Date of said County Facility. The Purchase Price of the County Facilities is to be paid solely from the amounts in the Acquisition Account, and the Community Facilities District shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price of the County Facilities except from the amounts in the Acquisition Account. Neither the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County nor the City make any warranty, either expressed or implied, that the amount in the Acquisition Account available for the payment of the Purchase Price of the County Facilities will be sufficient for such purpose. The date on which the Purchase Price is to be paid by the Community Facilities District and whether all or any portion of the Purchase Price will be paid to the Developer are controlled by the terms of the Acquisition Agreement. Section 3.2. Determination of the Purchase Price. The determination of the . Purchase Price shall be made consistent with the provisions of this Section 3.2. In order for the County Engineer to be able to determine the Purchase Price for a completed County Facility, the Developer shall deliver to the County Engineer: (a) A Payment Request for said County Facility, together with all attachments and exhibits to be included therewith, including a "Final Billing Calculation," as incorporated in Exhibit E with the County inspector having signed off as to all quantities stated in said form; (b) A copy of the documents conveying or which previously conveyed to the County Acceptable Title to the real property on, in or over which such County Facility is located, as described in Section 3.3 thereof. (c) A copy of the Notice of Completion for said County Facility that will be filed in accordance with Section 3093 of the California Civil Code, if applicable. Final lien releases addressed to the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County, and the City must be received by the County Engineer prior to the CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 10 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no payment of the Purchase Price for any County Facility shall be made unless the County has by written notice to the Community Facilities District and the City stated that the County is willing to accept ownership of the County Facility as constructed and to include it as part of its maintained system as of the Acceptance Date. Once the County Engineer has been provided with a complete Payment Request Form for the Purchase Price and all other documents as required by herlhim to determine the Purchase Price, the County Engineer will sign the Payment Request Form, identifying the purchase Price and (i) forward said document to the Administrator for payment consistent with the terms of the Acquisition Agreement and (ii) provide written notice to the Community Facilities District and the City as provided above. Section 3.3. Dedication of ProDertv and Easements to County. Acceptable Title to all property not presently held by the County on, in or over which the County Facility will be located shall be deeded over to County by way of grant deed, quitclaim, or dedication of such property, or easement thereon, if such easement is approved by County as being a sufficient interest therein to permit County to properly own, operate and maintain such County Facility located therein, thereon or thereover, and to permit the Developer to perform its obligations as set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The Developer shall furnish to the County a title report for such property not previously dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the County for review and approval at least thirty (30) Business Days prior to the notice required by Section 4.7 hereof. The County shall approve the title report unless it reveals a matter that, in the sole judgment of the County, could materially affect the County's use and enjoyment of any part of the property or easement covered by the title report. In the event the County does not approve such title report, the County shall notifY the Administrator in writing and the County shall not be obligated to accept title to said County Facility, and the Community Facilities District shall not be obligated to pay any portion of the Purchase Price for said County Facility until the Developer has cured such objections to title to the satisfaction of the County Consistent with the proceeding paragraph, the Developer shall obtain and provide, or cause to be obtained or provided, to the County duly executed irrevocable offer(s) of CFD No. 03.02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 11 dedication to the public for road and drainage purposes, including ingress and egress, for rights of way deemed necessary by the County for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the County Facilities. The irrevocable offer(s) of dedication shall be in a form approved by the County and shall be executed by all legal and equitable owners described in the offer. Section 3.4. Modifications to the Stated ACQuisition Cost. The Administrator, the County and the Developer may make modifications in the composition and description of the County Facilities, or in the amount of the Acquisition Cost for the County Facilities, whenever the Administrator, the City Engineer, the County Engineer and the Developer deem such modifications to be appropriate; provided, however, that such County Facility, as so modified, must be fully functioning and capable of being used for its intended purpose and must be consistent with the description of the County Facilities in the Proceedings. Any such modification shall be approved and implemented by the Administrator, with the approval of the City Engineer, on behalf of the Community Facilities District, the County Engineer, on behalf of the County, and the Developer by executing a supplement to Exhibit B containing a description of the modified County Facility and, if applicable, the adjusted Acquisition Cost. Upon the execution of any such supplement to Exhibit B, the description of the County Facility and, if applicable, the adjusted Acquisition Cost in Exhibit B shall be deemed to have been modified in accordance therewith. Any modification made pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement for purposes of Section 6.4 hereof. No County Facility may be deleted or added from Exhibit B pursuant to this Section 3.4. The deletion or addition of a County Facility from Exhibit B constitutes an amendment to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and may only be made pursuant to Section 6.4 hereof. Section 3.5. Application of Realized Savines. If the Purchase Price determined by the County Engineer for a completed County Facility is less than the stated Acquisition Cost on Exhibit B for said County Facility, then the difference is to be identified as "realized savings" that are available and can be applied to increase the Purchase Price of another County Facility or another improvement whose acquisition or construction is authorized to be funded with the proceeds of the Bonds. A request for an adjustment to the Acquisition Cost as to a specific County Facility pursuant to this Section 3.5 is to be initiated by the Developer or the City Engineer and an appropriate supplement to Exhibit B is to be prepared by the initiating party. Any proposed adjustment to a County Facility's acquisition cost is subject to approval by the City Engineer, on behalf of the Community Facilities District, the County Engineer on behalf ofthe County, and the Developer. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 12 ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF THE COUNTY FACILITIES Section 4.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans. To the extent that the Developer has not already done so, it shall cause Plans to be prepared for the County Facilities. The Developer shall obtain the written approval of the Plans from the County Engineer. The Developer shall provide a copy of all such Plans to the County Engineer and the City Engineer. Once the Plans have been approved, no changes are to be made thereto without prior written consent of the County and the City. Section 4.2. Duty of Developer to Construct. The Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed the County Facilities in accordance with the Plans approved by the County Engineer. The Developer shall perform all of its obligations hereunder and shall conduct all operations with respect to the construction of the County Facilities in a good, workmanlike and commercially reasonable manner, with the standard of diligence and care normally employed by duly qualified persons utilizing commercially reasonable efforts in the performance of comparable work and in accordance with generally accepted practices appropriate to the activities undertaken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall be construed (i) to require the Developer to perform any work requiring a contractor's license, nor shall the Developer be deemed to be performing construction services pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or (ii) require the Developer to cause the Plans to be prepared for the County Facilities at a specific time or in a manner other than as required by the approved conditions for the development of the Property. Section 4.3. Bid and Construction Requirements. (a) In order to ensure that a County Facility is constructed as if it had been . constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, a public agency, so that they may be acquired pursuant to Section 53313.5 of the Code, the Developer shall comply with all of the applicable requirements set forth in the Public Contract Code regarding the notice of bidding and award of a contract for a public works project by a county. (b) Prior to awarding the bid for any County Facilities, the Developer shall submit a bid packet and a signed set of Plans for the County Facility(ies) being bid for review to the County Engineer. A copy of the bid packet is to be provided to the City Engineer. The contract for construction of any County Facility is to be awarded to the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid after notice inviting sealed bids. Bids are to be publicly solicited consistent with applicable provisions of the Public Contract Code dealing with the bidding of public works projects constructed by the County. Public notice is to be given consistent with the Public Contract Code as to the date, time and place where bids will be opened. The County Engineer is to be provided with copies of all bids received and a bid summary in a form similar to Exhibit C hereto CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 13 to assure that the Developer adheres to the applicable legal requirements for public works projects. (c) The Developer shall require, and the Plans, bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such individuals or entities are engaged to perform work on a County Facility, to pay not less than General Prevailing Wage Rates to all workers employed in the execution of the contract, as required by the Labor Code, to post a copy of the General Prevailing Wage Rates at the job-site in a conspicuous place available to all employees and applicants for employment, and to otherwise comply with applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, the Code and the California Public Contract Code relating to General Prevailing Wage Rates as required by the specifications approved by the County Engineer. The County has provided the Developer with copies of tables setting forth the General Prevailing Wage Rates, and the Developer hereby acknowledges receipt thereof. (d) The Developer shall require each. principal contractor to provide proof of insurance coverage to the County satisfYing the requirements of Section 4.12 hereof throughout the term of the construction of the County Facilities. Rather than requiring its principal contractors to provide such insurance, the Developer may elect to provide the same for the benefit of its principal contractors. (e) Each principal contractor engaged to perform work on the County Facilities shall be required to furnish (i) labor and material payment bonds, and (ii) contract performance bonds, each in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price naming the Developer, the Community Facilities District, the County, the Authority, and the City as obligees and issued by a California admitted surety having a current A.M. Best. A:Vm (A:8) rating or an admitted surety insurer which complies with the provisions of Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All such bonds shall be in a form as shown in Exhibit D. The bonds tendered pursuant to this sub-section are to be accepted and held by the City Engineer. Rather than requiring its contractors to provide such bonds, the Developer may elect to provide the same for the benefit of its principal contractors. (f) The Developer shall comply, and shall cause each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such individual or entity is engaged to perform work on the County Facilities, to comply, with such other requirements relating to the construction of the County Facilities as the County may impose by written notification delivered to the Developer, to the extent legally required as a result of changes in applicable federal, State or County laws, rules or procedures. (g) The Developer shall require, and the Plans and bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such individuals or entities are engaged to perform work on the County Facilities, to submit certified weekly payroll records or other proof of payment of General Prevailing Wage Rates to the Developer and to furnish CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 14 certified payroll records or such other proof of payment of General Prevailing Wage Rates to the County Engineer and City Engineer promptly upon request. (h) AI1 change orders shal1 be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer for the purpose of ensuring that they comply with County standards and for the work represented by the change order to be eligible for consideration in determining the Purchase Price. If necessary, the provisions of Section 3.4 and 3.5 hereof may be utilized to accommodate the construction costs associated with an approved change order. (i) The Developer shal1 provide proof to the City Engineer and the County Engineer, at such intervals and in such form as the City Engineer or the County Engineer may require, that the foregoing requirements have been satisfied as to all of the County Facilities. G) The Developer has deposited with the County $50,000 to cover the anticipated costs, deemed necessary and reasonable, associated with the review and approval of the Plans, the review and approval of right of way and conveyance documents and with the processing and administration of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The Developer, within thirty (30) days after receipt of an additional billing for such costs, will forward the billed amount to the County. (k) At the time the Developer submits a "Notice of Intent" to commence construction as set forth in Section 4.7 below, the Developer shal1 deposit with County the estimated cost of providing construction inspection for the County Facilities, in an amount as determined and approved by County in accordance with Ordinance Nos. 671 and 749, including any amendments thereto, of the County, based upon the bonded value of County Facilities to be inspected, operated and maintained by County. Section 4.4. Licenses, and Rel!ulatorv Permits. The Developer shall secure all necessary licenses, agreements, permits, rights of entry and temporary construction easements (collectively "Licenses") that may be needed for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the County Facilities. The Developer is to secure all permits approvals or agreements, if any, required by the various Federal and State resource and/or regulatory agencies (collectively, the "Regulatory Permits") for the construction, operation and maintenance of the County Facilities. The Regulatory Permits include, but are not limited to, those permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"), California State Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. All Licenses and Regulatory Permits secured by the Developer shall be reviewed by the County Engineer prior to execution or acceptance by the Developer to determine whether the conditions they specify are satisfactory to the County to al10w it to operate and maintain the County Facilities. Section 4.5. NPDES Compliance. The Developer shal1 prepare and implement, or cause to be prepared and implemented, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirement of the State's National Pol1utant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 15 Associated with Construction Activity (SWRCB Order No. 99-08 DWQ) and any amendments thereto (the "General Permit"). The General Permit regulates both stormwater and non-stormwater discharges associated with construction activities required by this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The SWPPP shall identify site specific "Best Management Practices" ("BMP's") to be implemented during and after construction to control pollution of Stormwater runoff and receiving waters. The identified BMP's shall include, but not be limited to, "good housekeeping" practices for the Construction Site such as establishing stabilized construction access points, providing adequate sanitary/septic waste management, designating vehicle and equipment cleaning/maintenance areas, employing proper material handling and storage practices, maintaining adequate soil stabilization and erosion control practices to control the discharge of pollutants from the Construction Site and any activities thereon. The SWPPP shall also stipulate to an ongoing program for monitoring and maintenance of all BMP's. The Developer shall be solely responsible throughout the duration of constructing the County Facilities for placing, installing, constructing, inspecting and maintaining all BMP's identified in the SWPPP and amendments thereto and for removing and disposing of temporary BMP's. The Developer shall become fully informed of and comply with the applicable provisions of the General Permit, Federal, State and local regulations that govern the Developer's activities and operation pertaining to both stormwater and non-stormwater discharges from the Construction Site of the County Facilities and any area of disturbance outside said Construction Site relating to the County Facilities. The Developer shall, at all times, keep copies of the General Permit, approved SWPPP and all amendments at the. Construction Site. The SWPPP shall be made available upon request of a representative of the SWRCB, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Developer shall, at reasonable times, allow authorized agents of the above sited agencies, upon the presentation of credentials to: (i) enter upon the Construction Site; (ii) have access to and copy any records required to be kept as specified in the General Permit, (iii) inspect the Construction Site and determine whether related soil stabilization and sediment control BMP's have been implemented and maintained, and (iv) sample or monitor stormwater or non-stormwater runoff for purposes of ensuring compliance with the General Permit. The Developer shall be solely and exclusively responsible for any arrangements made between it and other property owners or entities that result in disturbance of land at the Construction Site. The Developer shall be responsible for all costs and for any liability imposed by law as a result of the its failure to comply with the requirements. set forth in this Section, including but not limited to, compliance with the applicable provisions. of the General Permit and Federal, State and local regulations. For the purpose of this Section, costs and liabilities include, but are not limited to, fines, penalties and damages whether assessed against the County, the City, the Authority, the Community Facilities District or the CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 16 Developer, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. Section 4.6. CaI/OSHA. Confined Space Entrv. At all times during the construction of the County Facilities, the Developer shall require all contractors to comply with all CaVOSHA safety regulations including regulations concerning confined space and maintenance of a safe working environment for the County, the City, the Authority and their respective employees on the site. This will include the preparation of a confined space procedure specific for all storm drain facilities. The procedure shall comply with requirements contained in Sections 5157 and 5158 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations. The confined space procedure is to be reviewed and approved by the County Engineer before proceeding with construction of the County Facilities. Section 4.7. Notice of Intent to Commence Construction. Not less than twenty (20) Business Days prior to the date on which it intends to commence construction on a County Facility, the Developer is to provide written "Notice of Intent" to the County Engineer. Construction on the County Facility may not proceed until the County Engineer issues a "Notice to Proceed" to the Developer, with a copy to the City Engineer. The "Notice of Intent" is to include the following documents: (a) Copies of all Licenses and Regulatory Permits secured pursuant to Sections 4.4 and 4.5, above, including a copy of the Notice of Intent ("NOI") and waste discharge identification number ("WDID No.") received from the SWRCB pursuant to Section 4.5, above. (b) Copies of the bonds required by Section 4.3( e), above. (c) Construction Inspection Deposit requinbd by Section 4.3(k), above. (d) Duly executed irrevocable offer(s) of dedication to the public for road and drainage purposes, including ingress and egress, for the rights of way deemed necessary by the County for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the County Facilities. (e) Preliminary reports of title dated not more than thirty (30) days prior to date of submission for all property described in the irrevocable offer(s) of dedication. (f) A complete list of all contractors and subcontractors to be performing work on the County Facilities, including the corresponding license number and license classification of each. On said list, the Developer shall also identify its designated superintendent for construction of the County Facilities. (g) A construction schedule which shall show the order and dates in which the Developer and the Developer's contractor proposes to carry on the various parts of CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 17 work, including estimated start and completion dates. As the construction progresses the Developer shall update said construction schedule upon request. (h) The final mylar plan and profile sheets for the County Facilities and assign their ownership to the County prior to the start of construction of each County Facility. (i) Certificates of insurance and endorsements as required by Section 4.13., below. (j) The confined space procedure as required by Section 4.6, above. Section 4.8. Bondin!! ReQuirements. The Developer shall post such subdivision bonds as are required by the City in connection with the recording of all subdivision maps for the Property. The Developer's obligations pursuant to this Section will be considered satisfied, in part, through the contract performance bonds to be provided by the Developer's contractors pursuant to Section 4.3(e) hereof. Section 4.9. Additional Conditions to be Satisfied durin!! Construction. (a) Construction of the County Facilities shall be on a five (5) day, forty (40) hour workweek with no work on Saturday, Sundays or days designated by the County as legal holidays, unless otherwise approved by the County. If the Developer feels it is necessary to work more than normal forty (40) hour workweek or on holidays, the Developer shall make a written request for permission from the County to work the additional hours (with a copy to the City Engineer). The request shall be submitted to the County at least 72 hours prior to the request date for additional work hours and state the reasons for the overtime and the specific time frames required. The decision granting permission for overtime work shall be made by the County at its sole discretion and shall be final. If permission is granted, the Developer will be charged the cost incurred at the overtime rates for additional inspection time required in connection with the overtime work in accordance with Ordinances Nos. 671 and 749 of the County, including any amendments thereto. Section 4.10. Inspection: Completion of Construction. The County Engineer shall have primary responsibility for providing inspection of the work of construction of the County Facilities to ensure that the work of construction is accomplished in . accordance with the Plans approved by the County, unless the Developer has made the election allowed by Section 4.7(c) above. County staff shall have access to the Construction Site at all reasonable times for the purpose of accomplishing such inspection. The Developer is to provide the County with written notice that it considers construction of a County Facility to have been completed consistent with the Plans and, upon receipt of said notice, County's staff will provide written confirmation that construction of the County Facility is complete consistent with the approved Plans and the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, which would include a CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 18 verification by the County's inspector as to the quantities used. Upon receipt of both written notices, the County Engineer will in a timely manner notifY the City Engineer, the Developer and the Administrator that the County Facility has been satisfactorily completed and that the Developer is to proceed with the recording of a Notice of Completion with respect to such construction pursuant to Section 3093 of the California Civil Code. The Developer is to provide a duplicate copy of the recorded Notice of Completion to the City Engineer, the Administrator and the County. Within a reasonable time following receipt of the duplicate copy of the recorded Notice of Completion and the Developer's compliance with other provisions of Section 3.2 hereof, the County will issue the written notice required by said Section 3.2 that it will accept the County Facility into its maintained system. Section 4.11. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties. The Developer shall maintain the County Facilities in good and safe condition until the Acceptance Date of the County Facilities. Prior to the Acceptance Date, the Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the County Facilities in proper operating condition, and shall perfonn such maintenance on the County Facilities as the County Engineerreasonably detennines to be necessary. As of the Acceptance Date, the perfonnance bond provided by the Developer for the County Facilities pursuant to Section 4.3(e) hereof shall be reduced to an amount equal to 10% of the original amount thereof and shall serve as a warranty bond . to guarantee that the County Facilities will be free from defects due to faulty workmanship or materials for a period of 12 months from the Acceptance Date, or the Developer may elect to provide a new warranty bond or cash in such an amount As of the Acceptance Date, the Developer shall assign to County all of the Developer's rights in any warranties, guarantees, maintenance obligations or other evidence of contingent obligations ofthird persons with respect to the County Facilities. Section 4.12. Maintenance DeDosits bv the DeveloDer for Enerl!izinl! Street Lil!hts and Maintenance of Retention Wall. (a) Street Lights. Plans that have been submitted to the County indicate that there are 20 street lights that are to be constructed within the right-of- way for the County Facilities. The County in its routine maintenance of street and drainage facilities does not have funds to energize street lights. Consequently, as a condition of acceptance of the initial segment of a County Facility in which a street light has been installed within the County's right-of-way, the Developer is to deposit with the County the sum of $240,638.25 to be placed in a trust account to be held in the County Treasury. This amount has been detennined by the County to energize the 20 street lights for a period of 30 years.. If at any point after the deposit of said monies, the County Facilities in which the 20 street lights are located are annexed into the City, City Service Area, or other public agency that will assume responsibility for energizing the street lights, the County will provide the Developer with a full accounting of all monies expended and return the unused balance to the Developer, including any interest earned.. All interest earned by the trust account will be retained in the trust account and applied to energizing said street lights. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 19 (b) Retention Wall. The Plans for Segment 8 that have been submitted to the County indicate that there is a retention wall to be constructed in the County's right-of-way that will measure approximately 360 feet in length and varies in height from approximately 2 feet to 25 feet. The County in its routine maintenance of street and drainage facilities does not have funds to maintain such a wall. Consequently, as a condition of acceptance of Segment 8 and said retention wall, the Developer is to deposit with the County the sum of $314,298.85 to be placed in a trust account to be held in the County Treasury. This amount has been determined by the County to remove any graffiti and repair the wall for a period of 30 years. If at any point after the deposit of said monies, the Segment 8 is annexed into the City, a city service area providing such services, or other public agency that will assume responsibility for the removal of graffiti and the repair of said retention wall, the County will provide the Developer with a full accounting of all monies expended and return the unused balance to the Developer, including any interest earned. All interest earned by the trust account will be retained in the trust account and applied to maintaining the retention wall. Section 4.13. Insurance Requirements. Without limiting or diminishing the Developer's obligation to indemnify or hold the County, the City, the Community Facilities District and the Authority hannless pursuant to Section 5.5 hereof, the Developer shall procure and maintain or cause to be maintained, at its sole cost and expense the following insurance coverages, or alternate coverages acceptable to the County's Risk Manager, during the term of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement: (a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability insurance overage, including but not limited to, premises liability, contractual liability, products and completed operations, explosion, collapse, use of cranes, and other heavy equipment and underground hazards, personal and advertising injury covering claims which may arise from or out of the Developer's performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy shall name by endorsement the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." Policy's limit of liability shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. (b) Vehicle Liability: The Developer shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in an arnount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Policyshall name by endorsement the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 20 (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance: The Developer shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws of the State of California. Policy shall include Employers' Liability (Coverage B) including Occupation Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident. Policy shall be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority; and if applicable, to provide a Borrowed Servant! Alternate Employer Endorsement. General Insurance Provisious - all lines: (i) Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State of California and have an A.M. Best rating of not less than an A:Vm (A:8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County's Risk Manager. (ii) The Developer's insurance carriere s) must declare its insurance deductibles or self-insured retentions. If such deductibles or self-insured retentions exceed $500,000 per occurrence such deductibles and/or retentions shall have the prior written consent of the County's Risk Manager before the commencement of operations under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Upon notification of deductibles or self-insured retentions which are deemed unacceptable to the County, at the election of the County's Risk Manager, the Developer's carriers shall either: (i) reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects this Agreement with the County, or (ii) procure a bond which guarantees payment of losses and related investigations, claims administration, defense costs and expenses. (iii) The Developer shall cause its insurance carrier(s) to furnish the County and the City with (i) a properly executed original certificate(s) of insurance and certified original copies of endorsements effecting coverage as required herein; or (ii) evidence of coverage acceptable to the County's Risk Manager that may include original certified copies of policies including all endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. (iv) Further, said certificate(s) and endorsements to policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier( s) that it shall provide no less than sixty (60) days written notice be given to the County, the Community Facilities District, the City and the Authority prior to any material modification or cancellation of such insurance. In the event of a material modification or cancellation of coverage, this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the County, the Community Facilities District, the City and the Authority receives, prior to such effective date of said material modification or cancellation, another properly executed original certificate of insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverages and the insurance required herein is in full force and effect. Individual( s) authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the certificate of insurance. . CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 21 (v) The Developer shall not commence construction of the County Facilities until the County and the City have been furnished either original certificate(s) of insurance and certified original copies of endorsement, policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments as required in this Section, or other evidence of coverage acceptable to County's Risk Manager. (vi) It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto and the Developer's insurance company(s) that the certificate(s) of insurance and policies shall so covenant and shall be construed as primary insurance, and the County's insurance and/or deductibles and/or self-insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory. (vii) The Developer may pass down to its principal contractors the insurance obligations contained herein and will require it principal contractors to name on their insurance policies by endorsement the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." Copies of such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to the County and the City. Section 4.14. Ownership of Facilities. Notwithstanding the fact that some or all of the County Facilities may be constructed in dedicated street rights of way or on property which is owned by or has been or will be dedicated to the County, a County Facility shall be and remain the property of the Developer until Acceptable Title to parcels not owned by the County with respect to such County Facility is conveyed to the County as provided herein. Ownership of said parcels by the Developer or other third parties shall likewise not be affected by any agreement that the Developer may have entered into or may enter into with the City pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision . Map Act, Section 66410 et seq. of the Code, and the provisions of this Section shall control. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 22 ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS; INDEMNIFICATION Section 5.1. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Developer. The Developer makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the. benefit of the County, the City and the Authority, as of the date hereof: (a) Organization. The Developer represents and warrants that it is a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the . State, is in good standing under the laws of the State, and has the power and authority to own its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now being conducted and as now contemplated. (b) Authority.. The Developer represents and warrants that it has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Developer. (c) Binding Obligation. The Developer represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Developer and is enforceable against the Developer in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (d) Completion of County Facilities. The Developer covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to do all things that may be lawfully required of it in order to cause the County Facilities to be completed in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (e) Compliance with Laws. The Developer covenants that, while the County Facilities are owned by the Developer or required pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be maintained by the Developer, it will not commit, suffer or permit any of its agents, employees or contractors to commit any act to be done in, upon or to the County Facilities in violation in any material respect of any law, ordinance, rule, regulation or order of any governmental authority or any covenant, condition or restriction now or hereafter affecting the County Facilities. (f) Pavrnent Reauests. The Developer represents and warrants that (i) it will not request payment from the Community Facilities District under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement for the acquisition of any improvements that are not part of a County Facility, and (ii) it will diligently follow all procedures set forth in this Joint Cornmunity Facilities Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 23 (g) Financial Records. Until the final Acceptance Date of all County Facilities, the Developer covenants to maintain proper books of record and account for the County Facilities and all costs related thereto. The Developer covenants that such accounting books wiII be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and will be available for inspection by the Community Facilities District, the County, the City and the Authority, and their respective agents, at any reasonable time during regular business hours on two (2) Business Days' prior written notice, subject to mutually acceptable arrangements regarding the confidentiality of proprietary data. (h) Hazardous Materials. The Developer represents and warrants that neither the Developer, nor any subcontractor, agent or employee thereof will use, generate, manufacture, procure, store, release, discharge or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under or about the Construction Site or the County Facilities or transport any Hazardous Material to or from the Construction Site or the County Facilities in violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation, rule, decision or policy statement regulating Hazardous Material. (i) Permits. The Developer covenants that it will pursue in a commercially reasonable manner all govemmental or other permits or licenses required to proceed with the construction of the County Facilities and that it will pay all fees relating thereto. The Developer represents and warrants that to the best of the Developer's knowledge, as of the date hereof, there is no material legal impediment to the Developer's proceeding with and completing the construction of the County Facilities or to the development of the Construction Site as contemplated by the Developer, except for govemment or other permits to be obtained. (j) Environmental Matters. The Developer represents and warrants that to its present actual knowledge all govemmental agencies have complied with CEQA as required for the construction of the County Facilities and their conveyance to the County. Section 5.2. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Authoritv. The Authority makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the County, the City and the Developer: (a) Authoritv. The Authority represents and warrants that the Authority has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all actions necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Authority. (b) Binding Obligation. The Authority represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Authority and is enforceable against the Authority in accordance with its terms, CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 24 subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) . Payment Requests. The Authority represents and warrants that Authority will follow all procedures applicable to it set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) Financial Records. Until the final Acceptance Date, the Authority covenants to maintain, or cause to be maintained, books of record and account for the Special Taxes and the Bonds in accordance with the requirements of the Code. The Authority covenants that such accounting books will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental entities, and will be available for inspection by the Developer and its agents at any reasonable time during regular business hours on two Business Days prior written notice. Section 5.3. Representations. Warranties and Covenants of the County. The County makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the Authority, the City and the Developer: (a) Authority. The County represents and warrants that the County has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of County. (b) Binding Obligation. The County represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the County and is enforceable against the County in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Comoletion of County Facilities. The County covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take expeditiously all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits, processing and approving Plans and inspecting the County Facilities. in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) Payment Requests. County will follow all procedures Community Facilities Agreement. The County represents and warrants that applicable to it set forth in this Joint Section 5.4. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of City. The City makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the Authority, the County and the Developer: (a) Authority. City represents and warrants that City has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA County Facilities - Execution Copy 25 taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement ha~ been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of City. (b) Binding Obligation. City represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of City and is enforceable against City in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Completion of Countv Facilities. The City covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take expeditiously all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits and processing and approving Plans in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) CEOA Compliance. On November 26, 2002, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 02-111 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED PLANNlNG APPLICATIONS ACTIONS AND ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN CONNECTIOIN THEREWITH FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD. (PLANNING APPLICATION 94- 0076)." The Notice of Determination for the Roripaugh Ranch Final EIR approved by Resolution No. 02-111 was posted in the Riverside County Clerk's Office on November 27, 2002 as required by law. All of the public improvements which are to be funded by Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), including, without limitation, the public improvements identified in this Agreement, were described, evaluated, and studied as part of the Roripaugh Ranch EIR and Council Resolution No. 02-111. Additionally, on August 24, 2004, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopted Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02," which was subsequently amended by Resolution No. TPFA 04-10 adopted on September 28,2004. Section 14 of Resolution No. TPFA 04-08, as amended, the Board found that: "no significant changes have occurred with respect to the project or the environment which require further study or which render invalid the conclusions and findings of the Roripaugh Ranch EIR. No facts exist upon which any findings pursuant to Sections 15162, 15163, 15165 of the State CEQA CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 26 Guidelines could be based to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or addendum to an EIR." Section 5.5. The Developer Indemnification. The Developer agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and hold the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County, the City, and their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, Board of Directors, City Council, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, representatives and agents (the "Indemnified Parties"), and each of them, hannless from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses, suits, actions, decrees, judgments, awards, reasonable attorney's fees, and court costs which the Indemnified Parties, or any combination thereof, may suffer or which may be sought against or recovered or obtained from the Indemnified Parties, or any combination thereof, as a result of or by reason of or arising out of or in consequence of (a) the approval of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, (b) the acquisition, construction, or installation' of the County Facilities, (c) for the design, construction, or failure of the County Facilities, (d) the untruth or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Developer in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or in any certifications delivered by the Developer hereunder, or (e) any act or omission of the Developer or any of. its contractors, subcontractors, or their respective officers, employees or agents, in connection with the County Facilities. If the Developer fails to do so, the Indemnified Parties, or each of them, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend the same and charge all of the direct or incidental costs of such defense, including reasonable attorneys' fees or court costs, to and recover the same from the Developer. No indemnification is required to be paid by the Developer for any claims, losses, expenses, suits actions, decrees, judgments, awards, reasonable attorney fees, and court costs (a) arising directly from the willful misconduct or sole and active negligence of the Indemnified Parties or (b) arising from the use or operation of a County Facility after the Acceptance Date of the County Facility, unless such claim, loss or expense results from the defective or improper design, construction or installation of such County Facility by the Developer of its agents. The provisions of this Section shall survive the termination of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execulion Copy 27 ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS Section 6.1. The Developer as Independent Contractor. In perfonning under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, it is understood that the Developer is acting . as an independent contractor, and not as an agent of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County or the City. Neither the Authority, the County nor the City . shan have any responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or supplier of the Developer. The Community Facilities District shall not have any responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or supplier of the Developer unless such entity or individual is specificany listed as a payee on the Payment Request submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement in which case the Community Facilities District shall be responsible for making such payment only if such Payment Request is approved pursuant to the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and only from funds available in the hnprovement Fund. Section 6.2. Other Al!reements. Nothing contained herein. shan be construed as affecting the County, the City or the Developer's respective duty to perfonn their respective obligations under other agreements, land use regulations or subdivision requirements relating to the development of the Property, which obligations are and shall remain independent of the Developer's rights and obligations lll1d the County and the City's rights and obligations under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement; provided, however, that the Developer shan use its reasonable and diligent efforts to perfonn each and every covenant to be perfonned by it under any lien or encumbrance, instrument, declaration, covenant, condition, restriction, license, order, or other agreement, the nonperfonnance of which could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the acquisition, construction and installation of the County Facilities. Section 6.3. Bindinl! on Successors and Assil!ns. Neither this Joint Community Facilities Agreement nor the duties and obligations of the Developer hereunder may be assigned to any person or legal entity other than an affiliate of the Developer without the written consent of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County and the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Neither this Joint Community Facilities Agreement nor the duties and obligations of Authority, the County, the City or the Community Facilities District hereunder may be assigned to any person or legal entity, without the written consent of the Developer, which consent shan not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The agreements and covenants included herein shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of any partners, pennitted assigns, and successors-in-interest of the parties hereto. Section 6.4. Amendments. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement can only be amended by an instrument in writing executed and delivered by the Authority, the County, the City and the Developer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Exhibit B may be supplemented consistent with Section 3.4 and 3.5 above. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 28 Section 6.5. Waivers. No waiver of, or consent with respect to, any provision of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement by a party hereto shaH in any event be effective unless the same shaH be in writing and signed by such party, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which it was given. Section 6.6. No Third Party Beneficiaries. Other than the Community Facilities District when formed, no person or entity shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement (either expressed or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County, the City and the Developer (and its respective successors and assigns), any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 6.7. Notices. Any written notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication to be given hereunder shaH be given to the party entitled thereto at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party may provide to the other party in writing from time to time, namely: County: Director of Transportation County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor Riverside, California 92501 Telephone: (951) 955-6740 Fax: (951) 955-3198 City: Director of Public Works City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Telephone: (951) 694-6411 Fax: (951) 694-6475 Authority: Temecula Public Financing Authority Treasurer 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Telephone: (951) 694-6430 Fax: (951) 694-6479 Developer: Richard K. Ashby Ashby USA, LLC 407 East Harrison Street Corona, California 92879 Telephone: (951) 898-1692 Fax: (951) 898-1693 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 29 . Each such notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the party to whom it is addressed (a) if personally served or delivered, upon delivery, (b) if given by electronic communication, whether by telex, telegram or telecopier, upon the sender's receipt of a document confirming satisfactory transmission, (c) if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, deposited with the United States mail postage prepaid, 72 hours after such notice is deposited with the United States mail, (d) if given by overnight courier, with courier charges prepaid, 24 hours after delivery to said overnight courier, or (e) if given by any other means, upon delivery at the address specified in this Section. Section 6.8. Jurisdiction and Venue. Each of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County, the City and the Developer (a) agrees that any suit action or other legal proceeding arising out of or relating to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall be brought in state or local court in the County of Riverside or in the Courts of the United States of America in the district in which said County is located, (b) consents to the jurisdiction of each such court in any suit, action or proceeding, and (c) waives any objection that it may have to the laying of venue or any suit, action or proceeding in any of such courts and any claim that any such suit, action or proceeding has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Each of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the County, the City and the Developer agrees that a final and non- appealable judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Section 6.9. Attornevs' Fees. If any action is instituted to interpret or enforce any of the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, the party prevailing . in such action shall be entitled to recover from the other parties thereto reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such suit (including both prejudgment and post judgment fees and costs) as determined by the court as part of the judgment. Section 6.10. Goveroinl! Law. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State applicable to contracts made and performed in the State. Section 6.11. Usal!e of Words. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shall include the feminine. Section 6.12. Counterparts. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. Section 6.13. Interpretation. The parties to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and their counsel have reviewed and revised this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities in an agreement are to be resolved against the drafting parties shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 30 Section 6.14. Desil!nation of Party's Representative. Each party is to prepare a certificate designating the person or persons that are to serve as the liaison between the County, the City, and the Community Facilities District regarding design, engineering and construction of the County Facilities. The certificates are to contain an original and specimen signature of each designated person. The certificates are to be provided to the County, the City, and the Community Facilities District at the time the first series of the Bonds are issued. [Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank] CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 31 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Joint Community Facilities Agreement as of the day and year first hereinabove written. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By Marion Ashley Chairman, Board of Supervisors By: George A. Johnson Director of Transportation ATTEST: Nancy Romero, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William C. Katzenstein, County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: City Clerk By: Mayor By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By: Peter Thorson CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy 32 ATTEST: Secretary By CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY By: Chairperson, Board of Directors ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Ashby Development Company, Inc., a California corporation, its Managing Member By: Justin K. Ashby, President By: USA Investment Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, its Member By: USA Commercial Mortgage Company, a Nevada corporation, its non-Member Manager By: Joseph D. Milanowski, President 33 EXHIBIT A Proposed Boundary Map of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy A-I ~9 ~8 o. ::r:o ~E-<Z O::JE-< f26~$~~ ~~~~~~ Cl~Cl~O~ ~<f2::r:U~ O~......~>ilU a:l~t:~8~ ClS:ldll<~o ~~~~~>il~ O::J~O < e;1l<:><c5, E-< ~<~ CZl Il<S~ U;:;s >il;:;s ~O E-<U - ~ o - r-. ~ 00 ] o a:l ., .,900 ... .S i.1 .,~ t; 0 4>;':::: 00.0 .,~... .,9..~ "'"3" ~ g"Ol s il Or-. .,... .,90~ .S ~ 0 ~ '0..... ~Cl)M ..... ... 0 ~''''.,9 ....... Cl '" ~"S< ;; o N o .1:: ~ 0 ,9.,9 o '" .g < Cloo ....S o 0 "0 8 a.s o~ a:l 0 .,.- .,9:E ... '" oi:l. M] ., ., .... S o ., ~r-. on ~ on on '" ~ 000 C I I I Q ~ ~ ~ .Cl ('f") N 00 E! ~ ob ob U1=\O~"""~-N ~ 9'::;::!;"'o-l:l.88.., "l!' Q I OIl I ..... I I OIl =f,J~=~=OO"'O= ::'l:;",]",g;;o;;olilg ~~~~obr:=ohoh ~ ~S~OO~C""l~~ \0 w.l V""" 0 lr.I 0 0 0 Gol I I I w.l 0 0 0 .;: ~ ~ 00 " , r-- 00 00 on on on a, a, a, t.!!! .S... "E e :' 0 0 c.S e ~ g:.= . as en et::: m 1::E..8 <>.. U 4-.1:.::1 ~.~ ~ O'Q 6 " CJ as 0 ~ .....9 ~u.s 0.00.,00 ~ 0 .a .,9 .g "0 I ;:l ~'r.! Ie., ., 00 8 (.) > ~ ~8 lEi ii2 .:!l !3 ~"O 0... .,90.",.,0 "O..c: 0l.,9 0 o u ~ s:: "E .,9 is.s '" 8"tij ~ U 8 2 -~"'.E" ...."<1" 0" -'" --- 8 0 ~.~ ~ eN a:l < Cl.S !3... .....'!l bO:.e 0 >. 0 .- .S :;:: 0.0 ~ E ~~ 6"20.,9"<1"- ..c: ~... 0 ;..- 000 ~.~ ~ u. g,:g -il?:l .. .. ..c: 0 p.i:l. ., - e ::I~ O'C Ol .. ., <=I 80gj"3e .- ..-.,9:> 0 .... .,90....::1...,.. .- u ..c: < of S "3 ~ gp ';:;" 00 ~'s"sooi::r-.~ '+J p... 0 ~ as ..... ~ 'I:: 0 ~ 0 ~ "'!ij 0 8 -.; ~ "tij 0 .,9 "0 E5,.s u B 0 ~ <i:;> <=I N ~... O'C"O .- ~ 0 u 0 Cl) 0 I 1:: 0 I ;::: u'!::;s . 8.o8.o3Cl", 0 ;.,"2 '~CIl~< Z .c {/} 0 ... Q) CI ~ 0 z ~ ~"E ~.,9 sa (!) ~ t) 5.... CCI '0 c:l "S ..c: .... 'E ., Z; ~ '" 0_ - ~ e 01-'004 = "t:S 5il .-.. u.~ Cl) '_~ Q).S '0 f1) ~.,9Clr-.~.,9~..c:~ o 'C ~ 0 ,9.,9 o '" ~< is 00 ... .s o 0 ] 8 o.s a:l~ o 11);':::: .,9.0 ~~ ~~ .s g ., ., t; e ~~ i g l:Q Q .... U Q ~ 5 o z ., ., ~ ..c: ... <=I 0 CI) 0 0 as -'" .-., ., 0-'" o <=I .8' 0 ..... =' 0 {/} u 0 {/j c:l "'g u.g.g S ., - ~ ;.,.,9 ~ ., 1l's~~ .... '" '" 1l g.0l"g....: '" e .... Ol " .... tS ~ 2 v_flJl1)ua ~ 5"O.d c.. tool {/)....~ ~"'~.,"g cE~~.sCl:f ~<ii2's] -1Z u is I 00 00 < .. " to 00 !;l l- S ~ ~ ~ ~ ::! ~ f u ., "0 .~ ;. ii2 ... o .... ~ o ~ f u EXHIBIT B COUNTY FACILITIES Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Facility No.1: Butterfield Stage Road Sta. 145+58.43 to Sta. 193+06 Street Facilities: Approximately 4,748' linear feet of easterly half width street improvements, including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks, median curb, grading, acquisition of slope, storm drain, and ingress/egress easements, but excluding street lights, and median and parkway landscaping. Underground Facilities: Line "A": From centerline of Butterfield Stage to inlet strUcture easterly ofR.O.W., consists of 47.5'010 of36" RCP, 30'010 of 18" RCP, catch basins, monolithic catch basins, local depressions, headwall, inlet strUctures, and concrete aprons. Underground Facilities: Line "B": From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet strUcture, consists of 52.7'010 of 24" RCP, joining existing 24" RCP, manhole, cutoff wall, headwall, inlet strUcture, and concrete aprons. Underground Facilities: Line "C": From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet strUcture, consists of 35.14'010 of 30" RCP, joining existing 30" RCP, inlet strUcture, and concrete aprons. Underground FaclIities: Line "D2": From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet strUcture, consists of 62.7'010 of 24" RCP, catch basin, monolithic catch basin, local depression, cutoff wall, headwall, inlet strUcture, and concrete apron. Underground Facilities: Line "D": Consists of 79.57'010 of 60" RCP from centerline to inlet strUcture easterly of R.O.W., with headwall, inlet strUcture, and concrete aprons. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy B-1 ACQuisition Cost $ 3,098,523 $ 59,438 $ 22,043 $18,914 $ 20,518 $ 52,663 Underground Facilities: Line "E" (Sta. 10+87.65 to 11+50.21) consists of 62.56'01: of 60" RCP from centerline of Butterfield Stage to inlet structure easterly of R.O.W., with headwall, inlet structure, and concrete aprons. Underground Facilities: Line "FI": From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet structure, consists of 71.45'010 of 18" RCP, junction structure, catch basin, local depression, inlet structure, and concrete apron. Line "F2": From centerline of Butterfield Stage easterly inlet structure, consists of 91.52'010 of 24" RCP, junction structure, catch basin, local depression, inlet structure, and concrete apron. Line "F3": From centerline of Butterfield Stage easterly inlet structure, consists of 39.65'010 of 18" RCP, junction structure, catch basin, local depression, inlet structure, headwall, and concrete apron. Facility No.2: Butterfield Stage Road Sta. 193+06.89 to Sta. 226+40.43 Street Facilities: Approximately 2,827 linear feet of easterly half width street improvements, including paving, curb and gutter, sidewalks, median curb, grading, retaining walls, acquisition of slope, storm drain, and ingress/egress easements, but excluding sidewalks, street lights, and median and parkway landscaping. Underground Facilities: Line "G" Consists of 162.08'01: of60" RCP from centerline of Butterfield Stage to inlet structure easterly of R.O.W., with headwall, inlet structure, and concrete aprons. Underground Facilities: Line "R"; From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet structure, consists of 135'01: of 24" RCP, headwall, inlet structure, and concrete apron. Underground Facilities: Line "I"; From centerline of Butterfield Stage to easterly inlet structure, consists of llToIo of 36" RCP, headwall, wingwall, inlet structure, and concrete apron. Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho California Road CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy B-2 Acquisition Cost $ 32,136 $ 55,270 Total: $ 3,327,369 $ 2,564,510 $ 58,166 $ 30,194 $ 24,068 Street Facilities: Intersection improvements, including paving, curb and gutter, grading, sidewalks, signalization, drainage devices, retaining wall, signing and striping, and erosion control but excluding median and parkway landscaping. Murrieta Hot Springs Road & Pourroy Road Street Facilities: Intersection signalization. GRAND TOTAL: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy B-3 $ 491,549 ACQuisitiou Cost $ 350,000 Total: $ 3,518,487 $6,845,856 'l I \ \Butterfield Stage Road \ Sta, 193+06 __ J.. ___ _ .__.' __~ ...-..- d~___: .__' ___ -----..,--- u-------~-.J;:~~/==<\ ~~_;i ! \ I' - \. " '1_ \ J -_\,: '~_~=_\]' .',g!! " J , ' ' ,'I, );'1)' J ' \'" I, I \j__-'----LJ~-"- .~.;: ,<..d~~~::;if~~: :J -\ ~'~--,/'r 'I'..' 'I' /,;Y/' i /SfieiJI ",'f 'I , : !'.Light-.< \1, '1/ 1 \ ',1,1 , . .---,------, " 'i /1 .\ II' I\,\ 1\ Ilcrr~) \ , '. .,) "n I, --~'~~-~r-)-~{\ ~ , /, , ,,\,j I \ \ ,-"" _.---r--i.l----~ \\ I \ l ,_-- 1\ _L_L/'{ \\\ L_,,,,__,'~'/r-_ -',1;\ I "I "~ L " i./ '\ , ,'>-,' I ' I'--..J~-----\ '~' "\ i":::_>~) 1--- "~XI' "/1' " i'.__<-----,' --=:~-"j "\ ' i ---!'--r-- 1-1 \\., I. I LLJ 1--, 0, ,- III ': i '-=1-" \1 ,-, \1\'\ I I I HALF WIDTH STREET IMPROVEMENT- /,-- .- -~ ~.' / ../" - EXHIBIT ''B~1.~/ RIVERSIDE COUNTYDEPARTMENT OF TRANSf!ORfA TION FACILITIES. RORIPAUGH RANCH TRACT 29353 Facility No. 1: Butterfield Stage Road Sta. 145+58.43 to 193+06 'D LlNE!'E'; -,; '" ,"C'- ;.~~~;;::'):\ SDLINI:'D2" \ Street Light , ! SD LINE ''0'' '\ Butterfield Stage Road Sta. 145+58.43 .. Retaining Wall SD LINE ';4" -</,:';~)~:_~--. ;~<<'" '/;"',-"/'/ G"\\\ //~~:-><:--., 0 " '.,,'" c~ ~~fi ~!~..,. " ' Ii I . . 111',1 , ' I: ; 'I' " " // / Butterfiet Stage Road Sta. 2'26+40.43 I I --'--'~---'-- 1------,--+-/0" i ! i ':: \ J I '\~~ HA,LF WID STREET , I Street :::;,: ~L,:~MR~QVff, 'E~'-- .... ..... _.1 , ! Light / i '; ". Vista Del MonteReja(J'_ccccc:;.: I i '--- I,' Ir i ';,1;:: Ii ..... --- -;-:1 i t\ \ "[ ;,:, . \ . I ' : 'I iY\... SD LINE, "G" I :.1 i ,; "'''/ i , :,,1/,"1 I:,'.... I I "'I'IT--h, ..... I I \ l( .,.11 .,7 Street I 'I - I!; , ------1--. ..e2.:' :1 :.Y L~~~L_ -.- I . / ~" -, \ \ , ~\__Jni::, ~;t \ I I / ---j: ; i "~' ,; \ I ,/ ,::: ,-~-f-----~-------~---~ --------i----'Ci',~=.r\\ , i :i:'/ \1 I /j-' 'e"" , ,i /~l--.. -I " ' 1, \ \ 1./ I//..'.-i:: H\;:-----Street---l : /..1,/ r' 3';: " . ~ h, I ' 1/ I~'I' """ . Ii ':'\ Lin"t ! /- ,/.-";' ,','~'::: L4\ ,::?II, \ ---.----J-/::-~~ \,' . _ il I t~l_ ,I \ . I /\......~.]' :'::1.'1: " n1);'1 I\Butterfield Stage Road , I \ '\ \ '\ :',::!: I( j Sta.19!+q6,ll9._. L<,,'~;;~:.;;~;, ~_:--- .. ..-d_ -" ,- .~;~:;;;~T--I'~ V> r-----....-....---- -- - - I EXHIBIT "B-2" \ RIVERSIDE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF I ' TIl4NSPORTA TION FACILITiES ROR)('AUGH RANCH TRACT 29353 Facilitr No.2: Butterfield Stage koad Sfa. 193+06.89 to 226+40.43 \ '" ..,-..1 \" '. ,', \ --" - ---- --, ..- ..-... -.--..----- '""-.------.-.--- ~".-_.--.---- u E:: el ~ li<1 ~ ~ li<1 U ~ rIl S ~ f;I;, o ; rIl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'C' I- ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ., z ... :) ... 0 I iii ~ ~ :::!. - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,., 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ! ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ~ 0 l!! III . iii - ~ c: 0 (J (J w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !;c ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci :; i= . III W C) 0 z . w Z f- a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 0 0 .:.: w 0 I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 () () (J ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci I/) ii: W W il:w ., ., ll. 0 0 WI- l- ll: Il: l1.c( Z l1. l1. 0:= ;:) ...1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WI- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >1/) i= ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci WW C :;: :) a l!! I Z :) I . . :; .. . W I ~ l- . ~ l- . . z . 0 u . I - - . . w 0 0 . u . :; "tl C w . Gl Gl ~ III a. c:i - '" M ..,. LO <0 .... co '" 0 ~ N M ..,. LO <0 .... co '" 0 , 'E 0 z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N Gl III :; . > "tl . "tl W II c( iii ~ ;::; b ..... , J~ o .d'~ 0Il'l'l ~ G ~~ o><l e.;, M.~ ,?~ ",'" 0" .. o~ ~i tl8 u ... ~ ~ f;l;l ~ ~ f;l;l U ~ 00 ~ .... I%l r.. o ~ ~ 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 "l:" I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 G> Z ... :;) . ... iii 0 I ::E ! c( - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ... G> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - u CO c l!! Ui iii - ~ c 0 (J (J 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !;( 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ::E t; 111 Cl 0 Z 111 Z - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .:.: I- 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U (J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W W Ul ii: . .., .., ir::w D- O 0 WI- I- 0:: 0:: D..C( Z D.. D.. O:i! :;) ..1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WI- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >Ul 1= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WW Z C c( . :;) a Ul I- Z :;) . . . . . . ::E . W I !:: . l- . ~ l- . Z . 0 . (J . I - . - . . 111 C 0 . (J . ::E 'tl s:: 111 . CIl CIl !:: en c. 0 - N '" .,. l() co ,... co C) 0 - N '" .,. l() co ,... co C) 0 . '2 0 - - - - - - - - - - N Z . ~ en ::E . ::i! 'tl 111 II iii !:: N ti -< ~ , ~>> 18 lil!j 'El,:E ; a ~~ o~ p:i. ~"' N.~ CC;.::: M'~ og ci""' Zi:' os ,,",0 UU U 1-< ... = ~ r-l ~ ~ r-l U ~ rn ~ ... = roo. o ~ rn 0 0 0 0 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'C' I- c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i CD Z .., :l . .., iii 0 ~ ~ d. ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ tJ c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i 0 tl Q . l! iii iii - i- c: 0 . 0 u w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 < 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i ::lO j::: . 1 VI w Cl d z w Z - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i I/) ii: W W il::w ., ., D.. 0 0 ~!cc l- II:: II:: Z lL lL O:E :l ...II- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 WI/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 >w j::: c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i W z C c( :l a VI I. l- . Z :l i. ::lO . w . !: ~ 1 . l- . Z . .0 . 0 . . . - - . . w Q 0 . . 0 . ::lO i:i w c !: . CI> CI> fA D- o ~ '" '" ..,. '" CD .... '" OJ 0 ~ '" '" ..,. '" CD .... '" 0) 0 . E 0 z - - - - - - - - - - '" CI> fA . > "tJ ::lO . ~ W II in !: '" u ..: ~ , :=~ u 0 !;lU ~15 .= .~ ..,., ~B .@"~ o~ ~, ~~ M.~ 9:.:= "'.~ og 6""' Z~ ~S ,,",0 UU EXHIBIT D PAYMENT BOND (Public Work - Civil Code Section 3247 et seq.) The makers of this Bond are as Principal and Original Contractor and , a corporation, authorized to issue Surety Bonds in California, as Surety, and this Bond is issued in conjunction with that certain public works contract dated as of 2004, between Principal, as owner, for dollars ($ ) the total amount payable. THE AMOUNT OF THIS BOND IS 100% OF SAID SUM. Said contract is for public work of those certain as defined and described in said agreement entitled: "Joint Community Facilities Agreement by and among County of Riverside, City of Temecula, Temecula Public Financing Authority, and Ashby USA, LLC" dated as of November I, 2004 The beneficiaries of this Bond are as is stated in 3248 of the Civil Code and the requirements and conditions of this Bond are as is set forth in Sections 3248, 3249, 3250 and 3252 of said Code. Without notice, Surety consents to extension of time for perfonnance, change in requirements, amount of compensation, or prepayment under said Contract. Signed and Sealed this Day of 200_ (Firm Name - Principal) (Business Address) Affix Seal if Corporation By: (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) (Title) (Corporation Name - Surety) (Business Address) . AffIX Corporate Seal By: (Signature - Attached Notary's Acknowledgment) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT (Title-Attach Power of Attorney) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy D-I PERFORMANCE BOND The makers of this Bond, as Principal, and as Surety, are held and fmnly bound unto hereinafter called the Owner, in the sum of Dollars ($ ) for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, fmnly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas the Principal entered into a certain contract, hereto attached, with the Owner, dated as of , 2004 for those certain . as defmed and described in said agreement entitled: "Joint Community Facilities Agreement by and among County of Riverside, City of Temecula, Temecula Public Financing Authority, and Ashby USA, LLC" dated as of November 1, 2004. Now therefore, if the Principal shall well and truly perform and fulfill all the undertakings covenants, terms, conditions and agreements of said Contract during the original term of said Contract and any extension thereof that may be granted by the Owner, with or without notice to the Surety, and during the file of any guarantee required under the Contract, and shall also well and truly perform and fulfill all the undertakings, covenants, terms, conditions, and agreements of any and all duly authorized modifications of said Contract that may thereafter be made, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue. Without notice, Surety consents to extension of time for performance, change in requirements, change in compensation or prepayment under said Contract. Signed and Sealed this Day of ,200_ (Firm Name - Principal) (Business Address) By; (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) AffIX Seal if Corporation (Title) (Corporation Name - Surety) (Business Address) AffIX Corporate Seal By: (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) A TIORNEY -IN-FACT (Title-Attach Power of Attorney) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy D-2 EXHIBIT E FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Ashby USA, LLC hereby requests payment of the Purchase Price for the County Facility described in Attachment A attached hereto. Capitalized undefined terms shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, dated as of November I, 2004 (the "Joint Community Facilities Agreement"), by and among County of Riverside (the "County "), City of Temecula (the "City"), Temecula Public Financing Authority and Ashby USA; LLC (the "Developer"). In connection with this Payment Request, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants to the County as follows: I. The undersigned is a Party Representative, qualified to execute this request for payment on behalf of the Developer and is knowledgeable as to the matters set forth herein. 2. The Developer has submitted or submits herewith to the County Engineer as-built drawings or similar Plans and specifications for the County Facility for which payment is requested, and such drawings or plans and specifications, as applicable, are true, correct and complete. 3. The County Facility has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and in accordance with all applicable County standards and the requirements of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and the as-built drawings or similar Plans and . specifications referenced in paragraph 2 above. 4. There has not been filed with or served upon the Developer notice of any lien, right to lien or attachment upon, or claim affecting the right to receive the payment requested herein which has not been released or will not be released simultaneously with the payment of such obligation, other than material men's or mechanics' liens accruing by operation of law. Copies of lien releases for all work for which payment is requested hereunder are attached hereto. 5. The representations and warranties of the Developer set. forth in Section 5.1 of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same force and effect as ifmade on and as of the date hereof. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy E-l I hereby declare under penalty of PeDury that the above representations and warranties are true and correct. Date: Developer By: party Representative CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A County Facilities - Execntion Copy E-2 00 E-< 00 o u ~ <~ E-<E-< z~ ~. =tl ur-1 <~ E-<O' ~r:;a E-< Z ~ ~ .... .<: co ~ o .l: ~ ~ .. c E ~ o o S " 0. E o U S !!l :; 0. o ! o ~ C .c .!! E Q. ::::l'i: % U 1:) :1 ~Q -~ o U u. .. U u. ::U o .. U c l!! ! i'5 "0];- 'ESe:: a>S~S EUO <- '" IJlD <Xl ];-~~ =ca::::l C - 0 ~~u a..'" UlD ~"O 511 .... 0- ~~ '" ];-"0 '" 11 c ._ ~ g a.5 -~];- :!t!.. an :g,'E; oSa 11 1: .... ~ C => l!! O~ '" ~.. c :: =>:1; c E.!! ~:s. '" ~ "ou mlt o 6 "0% mE ,g: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci - '" '" .... '" '" .... <Xl '" 0 :: '" '" .... '" '" .... <Xl '" 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" o o ci o o ci o o ci ii '" ~ , .. ~ " ~ cr " 0:: ;: g ~ 0 {!. E <( < '"- u ..... , ::='" ~8 s -a.c g B ""u 'i:: >< o~ ~, ~.. N.~ ~~ '" .~ o u .. 6'"- Z~ OS '"- 0 uu APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY ENGINEER The County Engineer confirms that the County Facility described in Attachment A-I has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor. The Actual Cost of each County Facility as described in Attachment A-I has been reviewed, verified and approved by the County Engineer. The Purchase Price for said County Facility is established at $ . Payment of the Purchase Price for the County Facility is hereby approved. Date: COUNTY ENGINEER By: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) . JCF A County Facilities - Execution Copy E-4 00 ... 00 o u ~ "';';;;J <... ...u z< ~~ ::=00 uli<l <;;;J ...0' ~~ ... Z Ii<l ~ /l.i - - r. '" ~ o ~ r. - '" .. c E ~ "0 o .. "Ii a. E o " s t ~ o o L: c .8 0 E :s. i "5 13 : I! Q '::~ C ';j ... .. 0... 1; _.. ;: :s 0 ~O Il c ~ e ~ 5 '" ...a:b c_c ~ .. ~ 0:; 0 E.!!O o(lJi' zoa:zo :=t;s OJ ;"500 ~.!! a(J~ -" 5 Il .... 0- cl~ <0 zo" '" Il c_ .. 0 ~ > 0.5 'iiub c::cu;:; In :~~:; 08a Il " ... ~ C ::l _I!! o ~ '" -.. "2m ::l:; c E.2 ,Sa. C'\l - i: ,," iii: Q ci "z DiE 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . - '" '" ... on <0 .... <Xl '" 0 - '" '" ;!: on <0 .... "' '" 0 - - - - - - '" o o o o o o o o o on ii , 2 >'-l .. " " a " '" - c 19 " 0 {3. E <( ~ u ..... , 3~ ~8 ~ " ~.~ ; g p.." ''; " o>'-l ~, ~.. q~ f"') 'u 0.. o~ Zc c:i !3 ~ 0 uu JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT COUNTY: FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS / JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (Flood Control Improvements) by and among RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CITY OF TEMECULA, TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY and ASHBY USA, LLC a California limited liability company Dated as of Novemberl, 2004 Relating to: Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1. Definitions......................................... ... ...................................................................... 5 ARTICLE II CONDITIONS PRECEDENT Section 2.1. Proceedings ........................................ .................................... .............................. ...... 9 ARTICLE III ACQUISITION OF THE FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES Section 3.1. Acquisiton of the Flood Control Facilties................................................................ 10 Section 3.2. Determination of the Purchase Price........................................................................ 10 Section 3.3. Dedication of Property and Easements to the Flood Control District...................... 12 Section 3.4. Modifications to Acquisition Costs ......................................................................... 12 Section 3.5. Application of Realized Savings.............................................................................. 13 ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES Section 4.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans .......................................................................... 14 Section 4.2. Duty of Developer to Construct ............................................................................... 14 Section 4.3. Bid and Construction Requirements ........................................................................ 14 Section 4.4. Licenses and Regulatory Permits ............................................................................. 16 Section 4.5. NPDES Compliance................................................................................................. 17 Section 4.6. CaVOSHA, Confined Space Entry........................................................................... 18 Section 4.7. Notice of Intent to Commence Construction ........................................................... 18 Section 4.8. Bonding Requirements..... ................................................ ..... ... ................................ 20 Section 4.9. Additional Conditions to be Satisfied during Construction..................................... 20 Section 4.10. Inspection, Completion of Construction................................................................ 20 Section 4.11. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties ................................................................... 21 Section 4.12. Insurance Requirements......................................................................................... 21 Section 4.13. Ownership of the Facilities .................................................................................... 23 ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS; INDEMNIFICATION Section 5.1. Representations, Warranties and Covenants ofthe Developer. ............................... 25 Section 5.2. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Authority................................. 26 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy Section 5.3. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the Flood Control District ............. 27 Section 5.4. Representations, Warranties and Covenants of the City.......................................... 28 Section 5.4. Representations, Warranties and Covenants ofthe County..................................... 29 Section 5.6. Indemnification........................................................................................................ 29 ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS Section 6.1. Developer as Independent Contractor ...................................................................... 31 Section 6.2. Other Agreements .................................................................................................... 31 Section 6.3. Binding on Successors and Assigns......................................................................... 31 Section 6.4. Amendments .................................... .......... ............. ................................................. 32 Section 6.5 . Waivers .......................................................................... ...... .................................... 32 Section 6.6. No Third Party Beneficiaries ................................................................................... 32 Section 6.7. Notices ............................................. .......... ............................... ......................... ... ... 32 Section 6.8. Jurisdiction and Venue.............................................................................................33 Section 6.9. Attorney's Fees .......................................................... ................................... ............ 33 Section 6.10. Governing Law ......................................................................................................34 Section 6.11. Usage of Words........................................................................... ...........................34 Section 6.12. Counterparts........................................................................................................... 34 Section 6.13. Interpretation .................................... ................................ ................. ..................... 34 Section 6.14. Designation of Party Representative......................................................................34 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED BOUNDARY MAP OF CFD NO. 03-02....................................... A-I EXHIBIT B FLOOD CONTROL IMPROVEMENTS - DIAGRAM, DESCRIPTION AND ACQUISITION COSTS................ ........................... .....................................B-l EXHIBIT C PARCELS AND EASEMENTS TO BE CONVEYED TO THE FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT ................................................................................C-l EXHIBIT D FORMS OF PAYMENT AND PERFORMANCE BONDS ................................E-I EXHIBIT E FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST ...................................................................... F-I EXHIBIT F FORM OF LICENSE AGREEMENT .................................................................. G-I CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (this "Joint Community Facilities Agreement") is made and entered into as of November 1, 2004, by and among Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to Chapter 48 of the Appendix to the California Water Code (hereinafter, the "Flood Control District"), County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the State of California (hereinafter the "County"), the City of Temecula, an incorporated municipality (hereinafter, the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 5, Division 5 of Title I of the California Govemment Code (the "Authority"), and Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company (hereinafter, the "Developer"). RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to a petition presented to the Authority executed by the Developer who owns more than ten percent (10%) of approximately 805 vacant acres comprising Tract Map Nos. 29353-1, 29353-2 and 29353-3 (collectively, the "Property") that are located within the boundaries of the City and are commonly referred to as "Roripaugh Ranch," the Board of Directors of the Authority (the "Legislative Body") has initiated proceedings to form a community facilities district that is to be identified as Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 ("Roripaugh Ranch") (the "Community Facilities District") by the adoption of its Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 on August 24,2004, as amended by Resolution No. TPFA 04-10 (the "Resolution of Intention"), under the authority of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Mello-Roos Act") (commencing with Section 53311 of the California Government Code (the "Code")). WHEREAS, the Developer is the master developer of the Property, as shown on Exhibit A, attached hereto, that will allow for the construction of approximately 2,000 residential units, approximately 15 acres of related commercial development, school and park sites, and construction of a fire station all within the boundaries or in the vicinity of the Community Facilities District. WHEREAS, the Developer has requested and proposed that the Community Facilities District be formed for the purpose of providing the means of financing the construction and/or acquisition of certain streets, related drainage improvements, and park facilities to be owned and maintained by the City, certain street and related drainage improvements to be owned and maintained by the County of Riverside (the "County"), certain flood control and storm water drainage facilities to be owned and maintained by the Flood Control District (the "Flood Control Facilities") and certain water and sewer improvements to be owned and maintained by Eastern Municipal Water District. The Flood Control Facilities are to be owned, operated and maintained by the Flood Control CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 2 District upon their acceptance by the Flood Control District. The Flood Control Facilities are diagramed in concept, described and their estimated acquisition costs are stated in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, Section 53313.5 of the Code provides that a community facilities district may only finance the purchase of facilities whose construction has been completed, as determined by the legislative body of the community facilities district, before the resolution of formation to establish the community facilities district is adopted pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Code, except that a community facilities district may finance the purchase of facilities completed after the adoption of a resolution of formation if the facility is constructed as if it had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, a local public agency. WHEREAS, alternatively, Section 53314.9 of the Code provides that at any time either before or after the formation of a community facilities district, the legislative body may accept advances of funds or work in-kind from any source, including, but not limited to, private persons or entities, and may provide, by resolution, for the use of those funds or that work in-kind for any authorized purpose, under all of the following conditions: (a) the proposal to repay the funds or the value or cost of the work in-kind, whichever is less, is included in both the resolution of intention to establish the community facilities district adopted pursuant to Section 53321 of the Code and in the resolution to establish the community facilities district pursuant to Section 53325.1 of the Code, (b) any proposed special tax is approved by the qualified electors of the community facilities district pursuant to the Act, and (c) any work in-kind accepted pursuant to Section 53314.9 of the Code shall have been performed or constructed as if the work had been performed or constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority, of a local public agency. WHEREAS, pursuant to the Act, the Board of Directors has adopted the Resolution of Intention stating that it is the intention of the Authority to cause the proposed Community Facilities District to be established, and if established, to reimburse the Developer all, or a portion, of the funds or value or cost of the work in-kind, whichever is less, without interest, provided all of the conditions of Section 53314.9 of the Code are satisfied and that such reimbursement shall only be from the proceeds of special tax bonds, if any are sold and issued by the proposed Community Facilities District. WHEREAS, the Act provides that the proposed Community Facilities District may finance the Flood Control Facilities only pursuant to a joint community facilities agreement adopted pursuant to Sections 53316.2, 53316.4 and 53316.6 of the Code. WHEREAS, the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Authority and the Developer desire to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, as required by the aforementioned sections of the Code and prior to the adoption by the Board of Directors of the resolution establishing the Community Facilities District. The provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement are intended to apply only to the Flood Control Facilities, unless expressly stated otherwise. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 3 WHEREAS, consistent with Section 53316.2 of the Code, the Authority, the City, the Flood Control District, and the County find that the approval of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement will be beneficial to the residents of the their respective jurisdictions and to the owners of property within the Community Facilities District. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual premises and covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 4 ARTICLE I DEFINITIONS Section 1.1 Definitions. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Article I shall have the meaning herein specified when used in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement: "Acceptable Title" means title to land, or an easement therein, delivered free and clear of all liens, taxes, assessments, leases, easements and encumbrances, whether any such item is recorded or unrecorded, except those non-monetary items which are reasonably determined by the Flood Control District and/or the City not to interfere with the intended use of such land or easement and therefore are not required to be cleared from title. "Acceptance Date" means, with respect to any Flood Control Facility, the date that the Flood Control Facility is accepted by the Flood Control District into its maintained system and the Purchase Price therefor has been determined pursuant to the terms this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. "Acquisition Agreement" means the "Acquisition Agreement" to be entered into by and between the Authority and the Developer, as originally executed or as the same may be amended from time to time in accordance with its terms "Acquisition Account" means the account by that or a similar name established within the "Improvement Fund" created by the Indenture. "Acquisition Cost" means, with respect to a Flood Control Facility, the amount specified as the Acquisition Cost for such Flood Control Facility in Exhibit B attached hereto, as the same may be modified by one or more supplements thereto entered into in accordance with Section 3.4 hereof or augmented as a result of cost savings pursuant to Section 3.5 hereof. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, constituting Section 53311 et seq. ofthe Code, as amended. "Actual Cost" means, with respect to a Flood Control Facility, an amount equal to the sum of (a) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of constructing such Flood Control Facility, including labor, material and equipment costs, (b) the Developer's actual reasonable cost of designing and preparing the Plans for such Flood Control Facility, including engineering services provided in connection with designing and preparing such Plans, (c) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of environmental evaluations required . specifically for such Flood Control Facility, (d) the amount of any fees actually paid by the Developer to governmental agencies in order to obtain permits, licenses or other necessary goverrunental approvals and reviews for such Flood Control Facility, (e) the Developer's actual reasonable cost for professional services directly related to the construction of such Flood Control Facility, including engineering, legal, inspection, construction staking, CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 5 materials testing and similar professional services, (f) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost for construction management bid administration services which shall not exceed 5% of construction costs, (g) the Developer's actual reasonable cost of payment, performance or maintenance bonds and insurance (including any title insurance required hereby) for such Flood Control Facility, (h) the Developer's actual, reasonable cost of any real property or interest therein acquired after the date on which the Community Facilities District is established pursuant to the Act for a party other than the Developer, which real property or interest therein is either necessary for the construction of such Flood Control Facility (e.g., temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc.) or is required to be conveyed with such Flood Control Facility in order to convey Acceptable Title thereto to the Flood Control District, all as specified in a Payment Request that is to be reviewed and approved by the Flood Engineer; provided, however, that (x) no item of cost relating to a Flood Control Facility shall be included in more than one category of cost specified in clauses (a) through (h) of this definition, and (y) each item of cost shall include only amounts actually paid by the Developer to third parties and shall not include overhead or other internal expenses of the Developer, except that, if Developer employees perform construction management, bid administration or contract administration services with respect to a Flood Control Facility, the actual reasonable cost of the salaries and benefits paid by the Developer to such employees for performing such services may be included as an item of cost relating to such . Flood Control Facility for the category of cost specified in clause (f) of this definition and subject to the 5% limitation specified in clause (f). "Administrator" means the Treasurer of the Authority, or herlhis designee. "Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority, a Joint Powers Authority established pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 5, Division 5 of Title I of the Code. "Board of Directors" means the Board of Directors of the Authority. "Board of Supervisors" means, respectively, the Board of Supervisors of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and the Board of Supervisors of the County of Riverside. "Bonds" means the bonds that the Community Facilities District may attempt to sell and issue in one or more series if the Proceedings are approved, a portion of the proceeds of which will be used to acquire the Flood Control Facilities. "Business Day" means a day which is not a Saturday or Sunday or a day of the year on which the Flood Control District is not required or authorized to be open. "CEQA" means the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), constituting Section 21000 et seq. of the California Public Resources Code, as amended. "City" means the City of Temecula, an incorporated municipality. "City Engineer" means the Director of Public Works of the City, or hislher designee. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 6 "Code" means the California Government Code. "Community Facilities District" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), a community facilities district to be organized and existing under the Code. "Construction Site" means the site on which the Flood Control Facilities are to be constructed, including off site staging areas and material storage areas. "County" means the County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the State, and its successors. "County Engineer" means the Director of Transportation of the County (or any successor to the responsibilities thereof if such office is no longer in existence), or hislher designee. "Developer" means Ashby USA, LLC, a California limited liability company, and its successors and assigns, acting as the master developer of infrastructure within the Community Facilities District, including but not limited to the Flood Control Facilities. "Developer's Representative" means the person or persons designated as such by the Developer in a certificate signed by the Developer and delivered to the City, the Community Facilities District, and the Flood Control District, which certificate shall contain an original or specimen signature of each person so designated. "Flood Control District" means the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to Chapter 48 of the Appendix to the California Water Code. "Flood Control Facility" or "Flood Control Facilities" means one or more of those public improvements that are identified and described in Exhibit B attached hereto and are to be owned, operated and maintained by the Flood Control District. "Flood Engineer" means the General Manager-Chief Engineer of the Flood Control District (or any successor to the responsibilities thereof if such office is no longer in existence), or his/her designee. "General Prevailing Wage Rates" means those rates as determined by the Director ofthe Department of Industrial Relations ofthe State. "Hazardous Material" means any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste which is or becomes regulated by any local governmental authority, the State or the United States Government, including, without limitation, any material or substance which is (a) designated as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 311 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. 9 1251 et seq. (33 U.S.c. 9 1321), (b) defined as a "hazardous waste" pursuant to Section 1004 of the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. 96901 et seq. (42 U.S.C. 96903), (c) defined as a "hazardous substance" pursuant to Section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 7 Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 99601 et seq., (d) petroleum, or ( e) asbestos. "Indenture" means the indenture, trust agreement, resolution, fiscal agent agreement or similar instrument, regardless of title, pursuant to which bonds, notes or other evidences of indebtedness of the Community Facilities District have been issued and are outstanding, as originally executed or as the same may from time to time be supplemented or amended pursuant to the provisions thereof. "Joint Community Facilities Agreement" means this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, dated as of November I, 2004, by and among the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Authority and the Developer, as originally executed or as the same may be amended from time to time in accordance with its terms. "Legislative Body" means the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, acting ex officio as the legislative body of the Community Facilities District. "Payment Request" means the document to be provided by the Developer to substantiate the Purchase Price of one or more the Flood Control Facilities, which shall be substantially in the form of Exhibit E attached hereto. "Plans" mean the plans and specifications for the Flood Control Facilities prepared or to be prepared at the direction: of the Developer pursuant to Section 4.1 hereof. "Proceedings" means those proceedings to be undertaken by the Board of Directors to consider the formation of the Community Facilities District and the approval by the Board of Directors and the qualified electors of the Community Facilities District of the authorization to levy special taxes therein pursuant to the Rate and Method and by the Legislative Body to sell and issue the Bonds. "Property" means the real property located within the Community Facilities District. "Purchase Price" means, subject to the provisions of Section 3.2 hereof, the lesser of the Actual Cost or the Acquisition Cost of a Flood Control Facility, allowing for the application of the provisions of Section 3.4 which provides for the modification of the Acquisition Cost and the provisions of Section 3.5 which specifies the circumstances in which additional monies may be made available to pay the Purchase Price. "Rate and Method" means the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes authorized to be levied within the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Proceedings. "State" means the State ofCalifomia. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities ~ Execution Copy 8 ARTICLE II CONDITIONS PRECENDENT Section 2.1. Proceedinl!s. The Developer has submitted to the Authority a petition requesting that the Proceedings be initiated by the Authority with regard to the formation of the Community Facilities District for the purpose of financing the acquisition or construction of certain public facilities, including the Flood Control Facilities, to authorize the levy of special taxes within the Community Facilities District pursuant to the Rate and Method and for the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance of one or more series of Bonds. Should the formation of the Community Facilities District be approved, the Legislative Body will use its best efforts to cause to be sold and issued, pursuant to the terms of the Act and Indenture, the Bonds in one or more series and a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds are intended to provide funds that will allow the Community Facilities District to finance a portion of the costs of acquiring the Flood Control Facilities. Should the Board of Directors not be able to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District and/or the Legislative Body not be able to sell and issue the first series of the Bonds within two years of date hereof, the Authority, the City, the Flood Control District, the County and the Developer will not be bound by the terms of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and it shall be considered null and void by the parties to it. The Developer acknowledges that the decision of the Board of Directors to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District and of the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance of the Bonds is an exercise of the legislative discretion of the Board of Directors and Legislative Body, respectively, and that the Authority may not enter into a contract or obligate either the Board of Directors or the Legislative Body to exercise its legislative discretion in a particular manner. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement does not, therefore, in any way create a contractual, legal or equitable obligation of or commitment by the Board of Directors to approve the formation of the Community Facilities District or the Legislative Body to authorize the sale and issuance of the Bonds. Should the Developer elect to abandon the Proceedings, the Developer shall provide written notification of such election to the Authority, the City, the Flood Control District and the County prior to the adoption by the Legislative Body of the Resolution authorizing the sale and issuance of the Bonds. The Board of Directors and the Legislative Body shall have the jurisdiction to and shall be solely responsible for undertaking the Proceedings consistent with the provisions of the Act, the Indenture and the applicable provisions of the Acquisition Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 9 ARTICLE III ACQUISITION OF FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES Section 3.1. Acquisition of Flood Control Facilities. The Developer hereby agrees to transfer to the Flood Control District each of the Flood Control Facilities and the Community Facilities District hereby agrees to pay the Purchase Price thereof, subject to the terms and conditions hereof and the Acquisition Agreement. Acceptable Title to any parcels on which any Flood Control Facility is constructed and for which title is not presently held by the Flood Control District as we\1 as the Flood Control Facility financed pursuant hereto shall be transferred to the Flood Control District as of the Acceptance Date; provided, however, that notwithstanding such transfer, as provided in Section 4.11 hereof, the Developer shall be solely responsible for the maintenance of any Flood Control Facility until the Acceptance Date of said Flood Control Facility. The Purchase Price of the Flood Control Facilities is to be paid solely from the . amounts in the Acquisition Account, and the Community Facilities District shall not be obligated to pay the Purchase Price of the Flood Control Facilities except from the amounts in the Acquisition Account. Neither the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County nor the City make any warranty, either expressed or implied, that the amount in the Acquisition Account available for the payment of the Purchase Price of the Flood Control Facilities will be sufficient for such purpose. The date on which the Purchase Price is to be paid by the Community Facilities District and whether all or any portion of the Purchase Price will be paid to the Developer are contro\1ed by the terms of the Acquisition Agreement Section 3.2. Determination of the Purchase Price. The determination of the Purchase Price shall be made consistent with the provisions of this Section 3.2. In order for the Flood Engineer to be able to determine the Purchase Price for a completed Flood Control Facility, the Developer sha\1 deliver to the Flood Engineer: (a) A Payment Request for said Flood Control Facility, together with all attachments and exhibits to be included therewith; (b) A copy of the documents conveying or which previously conveyed to the Flood Control District Acceptable Title to the real property on, in or over which such Flood Control Facility is located, as described in Section 3.3 thereof; (c) A copy of the Notice of Completion for said Flood Control Facility that will be filed in accordance with Section 3093 of the California Civil Code, if applicable. Final lien releases addressed to the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, and the City must be received by the CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 10 Flood Engineer prior to the Flood Engineer executing the authorization for the Community Facilities District to pay the Purchase Price. (d) The Developer's civil engineer of record or construction civil engineer of record duly registered in the State shall provide to the Flood Control District redlined "as-built" plans and profile sheets for the Flood Control Facility. After the Flood Control District's approval of the redlined "as-built" drawings, the Developer's engineer shall schedule with the Flood Control District a time to transfer the redlines onto the Flood Control District's original mylars at the Flood Control District's office, after which, said engineer shall review, stamp and sign the original mylars "As-Built." (e) The City and the Flood Control District will enter into a license agreement (the "License Agreement") that is substantially in the form of Exhibit F. The License Agreement will provide that the City has access to Facility No. 1 as described in Exhibit B for purposes of use of the maintenance roads and a structure to be constructed within the Flood Control District's right-of way for a multi-purpose trail. It will also require the City to indemnifY the Flood Control District for use of portions of the Flood Control District's right-of-way as a multi- purpose trail. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, no payment of the Purchase Price for any Flood Control Facility shall be made unless the Flood Control District has by written notice to the Community Facilities District and the City stated that the Flood Control District is willing to accept ownership of the Flood Control Facility as constructed and to include it as part of its maintained system as of the Acceptance Date. Said notice will not be provided to the Community Facilities District and the City until the Developer has provided or caused to be provided to the Flood Control District: (a) Documents by which the Developer conveys to the Flood Control District an easement for storm drain facilities, in a form approved by the Flood Control District, for rights of way as shown in concept in red on Exhibit C, and policies of title insurance, in an amount not less than fifty percent (50%) of the estimated fee value, as determined by the Flood Control District, for each parcel so conveyed have been provided to the Flood Control District. (b) Documents by which the Developer conveys to the Flood Control District an easement, including ingress and egress, in a form approved by the Flood Control District, for the rights of way shown in concept blue on Exhibit C, and policies of title insurance, in an amount not less than fifty percent (50%) of the estimated fee value, as determined by the Flood Control District, for each parcel so conveyed have been provided to the Flood Control District. (c) Documents by which the Developer conveys to the Flood Control District fee title, in a form approved by the Flood Control District, for the rights of way shown in concept green on Exhibit C, and policies of title insurance, in an amount not less than one hundred percent (100%) of the estimated fee value, as CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 11 detennined by the Flood Control District, for each parcel so conveyed have been provided to the Flood Control District. Once the Flood Engineer has been provided with a complete Payment Request Fonn for the Purchase Price and all other documents as required by him to detennine the Purchase Price, the Flood Engineer will sign the Payment Request Fonn, identifying the Purchase Price and (i) forward said document to the Administrator for payment consistent with the tenns of the Acquisition Agreement and (ii) provide written notice to the Community Facilities District and the City as provided above. Section 3.3. Dedication of Property and Easements to Flood Control District. Acceptable Title to all property not presently held by the Flood Control District on, in or over which the Flood Control Facility will be located shall be deeded over to Flood Control District by way of grant deed, quitclaim, or dedication of such property, or easement thereon, if such easement is approved by Flood Control District as being a sufficient interest therein to pennit Flood Control District to properly own, operate and maintain such Flood Control Facility located therein, thereon or thereover, and to pennit the Developer to perfonn its obligations as set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The Developer shall furnish to the Flood Control District a title report for such property not previously dedicated or otherwise conveyed to the Flood Control District for review and approval at least thirty (30) Business Days prior to the notice required by Section 4.7 hereof. The Flood Control District shall approve the title report unless it reveals a matter that, in the sole judgment of the Flood Control District, could materially affect the Flood Control District's use and enjoyment of any part of the property or easement covered by the title report. In the event the Flood Control District does not approve such title report, the Flood Control District shall notify the Administrator in writing and the Flood Control District shall not be obligated to accept title to said Flood Control Facility, and the Community Facilities District shall not be obligated to pay any portion of the Purchase Price for said Flood Control Facility until the Developer has cured such objections to title to the satisfaction of the Flood Control District Consistent with the proceeding paragraph, the Developer shall obtain and provide, or cause to be obtained or provided, to the Flood Control District duly executed irrevocable offer(s) of dedication to the public for flood control purposes, including ingress and egress, for rights of way deemed necessary by the Flood Control District for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Facilities as shown in concept on Exhibit C which is attached hereto and by this referenced incorporated herein. The irrevocable offer(s) of dedication shall be in a fonn approved by the Flood Control District and shall be executed by all legal and equitable owners described in the offer. Section 3.4. Modifications to the Stated Acquisition Cost. The Administrator, the Flood Control District and the Developer may make modifications in the composition and description of the Flood Control Facilities, or in the amount of the Acquisition Cost for the Flood Control Facilities, whenever the Administrator, the City CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 12 Engineer, the Flood Engineer and the Developer deem such modifications to be appropriate; provided, however, that such Flood Control Facility, as so modified, must be fully functioning and capable of being used for its intended purpose and must be consistent with the description of the Flood Control Facilities in the Proceedings. Any such modification shall be approved and implemented by the Administrator, with the approval of the City Engineer, on behalf of the Community Facilities District, the Flood Engineer, on behalf of the Flood Control District, and the Developer by executing a supplement to Exhibit B containing a description of the modified Flood Control Facility and, if applicable, the adjusted Acquisition Cost. Upon the execution of any such supplement to Exhibit B, the description of the Flood Control Facility and, if applicable, the adjusted Acquisition Cost in Exhibit B shall be deemed to have been modified in accordance therewith. Any modification made pursuant to this Section shall not be deemed to be an amendment of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement for purposes of Section 6.4 hereof. No Flood Control Facility may be deleted or added from Exhibit B pursuant to this Section 3.4. The deletion or addition of a Flood Control Facility from Exhibit B constitutes an amendment to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and may only be made pursuant to Section 6.4 hereof. Section 3.5. Aoolication of Realized Savines. If the Purchase Price determined by the Flood Engineer for a completed Flood Control Facility is less than the stated Acquisition Cost of said Flood Control Facility on Exhibit B for said Flood Control Facility, then the difference is to be identified as "realized savings" that are available and can be applied to increase the Purchase Price of another Flood Control Facility or another improvement whose acquisition or construction is authorized to be funded with the proceeds of the Bonds. A request for an adjustment to the Acquisition Cost pursuant to this Section 3.5 is to be initiated by the Developer or the City Engineer and an appropriate supplement to Exhibit B is to be prepared by initiating party. Any proposed adjustment to a Flood Control Facilities Acquisition cost is subject to the approval by the City Engineer, on behalf of the Community Facilities District, the Flood Engineer on behalf of the Flood Control District, and the Developer. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 13 ARTICLE IV CONSTRUCTION OF THE FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES Section 4.1. Preparation and Approval of Plans. To the extent that the Developer has not already done so, it shall cause Plans to be prepared for the Flood Control Facilities. The Developer shall obtain the written approval of the Plans from the Flood Engineer, the City Engineer and the CoUnty Engineer, as appropriate. The Developer shall provide a copy of all such Plans to the Flood Engineer, the City Engineer, and the County Engineer, as appropriate. Once the Plans have been approved, no changes are to be made thereto without prior written consent of the Flood Control District, the. City and the County Engineer, as appropriate. Section 4.2. Duty of Developer to Construct. The Developer shall construct or cause to be constructed the Flood Control Facilities in accordance with the Plans approved by the Flood Engineer, the City Engineer, and the County Engineer. The Developer shall perform all of its obligations hereunder and shall conduct all operations with respect to the construction of the Flood Control Facilities in a good, workmanlike and commercially reasonable manner, with the standard of diligence and care normally employed by duly qualified persons utilizing commercially reasonable efforts in the performance of comparable work and in accordance with generally accepted practices appropriate to the activities undertaken. Notwithstanding the foregoing, nothing set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall be construed (i) to require the Developer to perform any work requiring a contractor's license, nor shall the Developer be deemed to be performing construction services pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or (ii) require the Developer to cause the Plans to be prepared for the Flood Control Facilities at a specific time or in a manner other than as required by the approved conditions for the development of the Property. Section 4.3. Bid and Construction Requirements. (a) In order to ensure that a Flood Control Facility is constructed as if it had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, a public agency, so that they may be acquired pursuant to Section 53313.5 of the Code, the Developer shall comply with all of the requirements set forth in the Public Contract Code regarding the notice of bidding and award of contract for a public works project by a public agency such as the Flood Control District. (b) Prior to awarding the bid for any Flood Control Facilities, the Developer shall submit a bid packet for review to the Flood Engineer. A copy of the bid packet is to be provided to the City Engineer. The contract for construction of any Flood Control Facility is to be awarded to the responsible bidder submitting the lowest responsive bid after notice inviting sealed bids. Bids are to be publicly solicited consistent with the applicable provisions of Public Contract Code dealing with the bidding of public works projects constructed by the Flood Control District. Public notice is to be given consistent CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 14 with the Public Contract Code as to the date, time and place where bids will be opened. The Flood Control District is to be provided with copies of all bids received to assure that the Developer adheres to the applicable legal requirements for public works projects. (c) The Developer shall require, and the Plans, bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such individuals or entities are engaged to perform work on a Flood Control Facility, to pay not less than General Prevailing Wage Rates to all workers employed in the execution of the contract, as required by the Labor Code, to post a copy of the General Prevailing Wage Rates at the job-site in a conspicuous place available to all employees and applicants for employment, and to otherwise comply with applicable provisions of the California Labor Code, the Code and the California Public Contracts Code relating to General Prevailing Wage Rates as required by the specifications approved by the Flood Engineer. The Flood Control District has provided the Developer with copies of tables setting forth the General Prevailing Wage Rates, and the Developer hereby acknowledges receipt thereof. (d) The Developer shall require each principal contractor to provide proof of insurance coverage to the Flood Control District satisfying the requirements of \ Section 4.12 hereof throughout the term of the construction of the Flood Control Facilities. Rather than requiring its principal contractors to provide such insurance, the Developer may elect to provide the same for the benefit of its principal contractors. (e) Each principal contractor engaged to perform work on the Flood Control Facilities shall be required to furnish (i) labor and material payment bonds, and (ii) contract performance bonds, each in an amount equal to 100% of the contract price naming the Developer, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the Authority, and the City as obligees and issued by a California admitted surety having a current A.M. Best A:Vrn (A:8) rating or an admitted surety insurer which complies with the provisions of Section 995.660 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. All such bonds shall be in a form as shown in Exhibit D. The bonds tendered pursuant to this sub- section are to be accepted and held by the City Engineer. Rather than requiring its contractors to provide such bonds, the Developer may elect to provide the same for the benefit of its principal contractors. (f) The Developer shall comply, and shall cause each contractor, subcontractor, vendor, equipment operator and owner operator, in each such case to the extent such individual or entity is engaged to perform work on the Flood Control Facilities, to comply, with such other requirements relating to the construction of the Flood Control Facilities as the Flood Control District may impose by written notification delivered to the Developer, to the extent legally required as a result of changes in applicable federal, State or County laws, rules or procedures. (g) The Developer shall require, and the Plans and bid and contract documents shall require, all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, equipment operators and owner operators, in each such case to the extent such individuals or entities are engaged to perform work on the Flood Control Facilities, to submit certified weekly payroll records CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 15 or other proof of payment of General Prevailing Wage Rates to the Developer and to furnish certified payroll records or such other proof of payment of General Prevailing Wage Rates to the Flood Engineer and City Engineer promptly upon request. (h) All change orders shall be reviewed and, if appropriate, approved by the Flood Engineer for the purpose of ensuring that they comply with Flood Control District standards and for the work represented by the change order to be eligible for consideration in determining the Purchase Price. If necessary, the provisions of Section 3.3 and 3.5 hereof may be utilized to accommodate the construction costs associated with the change order. (i) The Developer shall provide proof to the City Engineer and the Flood Engineer, at such intervals and in such form as the City Engineer or the Flood Engineer may require, that the foregoing requirements have been satisfied as to all of the Flood Control Facilities. . G) The Developer has deposited with the Flood Control District monies to cover the anticipated costs, deemed necessary and reasonable, associated with the review and approval of the Plans, the review and approval of right of way and conveyance documents and with the processing and administration of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The Developer, within thirty (30) days after receipt of an additional billing for such costs, will forward the billed amount to the Flood Control District. (k) At the time the Developer submits a "Notice of Intent" to commence construction as set forth in Section 4.7 below, the Developer shall deposit with Flood Control District (Attention: Business Office - Accounts Receivable) the estimated cost of providing construction inspection for the Flood Control Facilities, in an amount as determined and approved by Flood Control District in accordance with Ordinance Nos. 671 and 749, including any amendments thereto, of the County, based upon the bonded value of Flood Control Facilities to be inspected; operated and maintained by Flood Control District. (I) At the time the Developer submits a "Notice of Intent" to commence construction as set forth in Section 4.7 below, the Developer shall make a one time cash deposit with the Flood Control District of $782,640 with respect to the Flood Control Facilities that represents the Flood Control District's estimated cost to operate and maintain each Flood Control Facility for a period often (10) years commencing upon the Acceptance Date. The deposit will be placed in the Flood Control District's Zone 7 Maintenance Subaccount. This one time deposit for operation and maintenance shall not be included in the determination of the Actual Cost or the Purchase Price of the Flood Control Facilities for which the deposit is made. Section 4.4. Licenses. and Rel!ulatorv Permits. The Developer shall secure all necessary licenses, agreements, permits, rights of entry and temporary construction easements (collectively "Licenses") that may be needed for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Facilities. The Developer is to secure all permits approvals or agreements, if any, required by the various Federal and State CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 16 resource and/or regulatory agencies (collectively, the "Regulatory Permits") for the construction, operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Facilities. The Regulatory Permits include, but are not limited to, those permits issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the State Water Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"), California State Department of Fish and Game and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. All Licenses and Regulatory Permits secured by the Developer shall be reviewed by the Flood Engineer prior to execution or acceptance by the Developer to determine whether the conditions they specify are satisfactory to the Flood Control District to allow it to operate and maintain the Flood Control Facilities. Section 4.5. NPDES Compliance. The Developer shall prepare and implement, or cause to be prepared and implemented, a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) in accordance with the requirement of the State's National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity (SWRCB Order No. 99-08 DWQ) and any amendments thereto (the "General Permit"). The General Permit regulates both stormwater and non-stormwater discharges associated with construction activities required by this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The SWPPP shall identify site specific "Best Management Practices" ("BMP's") to be implemented during and after construction to control pollution of Stormwater runoff and receiving waters. The identified BMP's shall include, but not be limited to, "good housekeeping" practices for the Construction Site such as establishing stabilized construction access points, providing adequate sanitary/septic waste management, designating vehicle and equipment cleaning/maintenance areas, employing proper material handling and storage practices, maintaining adequate soil stabilization and erosion control practices to control the discharge of pollutants from the Construction Site and any activities thereon. The SWPPP shall also stipulate to an ongoing program for monitoring and maintenance of all BMP's. The Developer shall be solely responsible throughout the duration of constructing the Flood Control Facilities for placing, installing, constructing, inspecting and maintaining all BMP's identified in the SWPPP and amendments thereto and for removing and disposing of temporary BMP's. The Developer shall become fully informed of and comply with the applicable provisions of the General Permit, Federal, State and local regulations that govern the Developer's activities and operation pertaining to both stormwater and non-stormwater discharges from the Construction Site of the Flood Control Facilities and any area of disturbance outside said Construction Site relating to the Flood Control Facilities. The Developer shall, at all times, keep copies of the General Permit, approved SWPPP and all amendments at the Construction Site. The SWPPP shall be made available upon request of a representative of the SWRCB, San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board, or the United States Environmental Protection Agency. The Developer shall, at reasonable times, allow authorized agents of the above sited agencies, upon the presentation of credentials to: (i) enter upon the Construction Site; (ii) have access to and copy any records required to be kept as specified in the General Permit, (iii) inspect the CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 17 Construction Site and determine whether related soil stabilization and sediment control BMP's have been implemented and maintained, and (iv) sample or monitor stormwater or non-stormwater runoff for purposes of ensuring compliance with the General Permit. The Developer shall be solely and exclusively responsible for any arrangements made between it and other property owners or entities that result in disturbance of land at the Construction Site. The Developer shall be responsible for all costs and for any liability imposed by law as a result of the its failure to comply with the requirements set forth in this Section, including but not limited to, compliance with the applicable provisions of the General Permit and Federal, State and local regulations. For the purpose of this Section, costs and liabilities include, but are not limited to, fines, penalties and damages whether assessed against the Flood Control District, the City, the Authority, the Community Facilities District or the Developer, including those levied under the Federal Clean Water Act and the State's Porter-Cologne Water Quality Act. Section 4.6. CaVOSHA. Confined Space Entrv. At all times during the construction of the Flood Control Facilities, the Developer shall require all contractors to comply with all Cal/OSHA safety regulations including regulations concerning confined space and maintenance of a safe working environment for the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Authority and their respective employees on the site. This will include the preparation of a confined space procedure specific for all storm drain facilities. The procedure shall comply with requirements contained in Sections 5157 and 5158 of Title 8 of the California Code of Regulations and the Flood Control District's "Confined Space Procedure, SOM-18." The confined space procedure is to be review and approved by the Flood Engineer before proceeding with construction of the Flood Control Facilities. Section 4.7. Notice of Intent to Commence Construction. Not less than twenty (20) Business Days prior to the date on which it intends to commence construction on a Flood Control Facility, the Developer is to provide written "Notice of Intent" to the Flood Engineer. Construction on the Flood Control Facility may not proceed until the Flood Engineer issues a "Notice to Proceed" to the Developer, with a copy to the City Engineer. The "Notice of Intent" is to include the following documents: (a) Copies of all Licenses and Regulatory Permits secured pursuant to Sections 4.4 and 4.5, above, including a copy of the Notice of Intent ("NO I") and waste discharge identification number ("WDID No.") received from the SWRCB pursuant to Section 4.5, above. (b) Copies of the bonds required by Section 4.3(e), above. (c) Construction Inspection Deposit required by Section 4.3(k), above. The Flood Control District's construction inspection staff is limited and, therefore, the issuance of a Notice to Proceed is subject to staff availability. In the event the Developer wishes to expedite issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the Developer CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 18 may elect to furnish an independent qualified construction inspector. The Developer shall furnish appropriate documentation of the individual's credentials and experience to the Flood Engineer for review and approval. The Flood Engineer shall review the individual's qualifications and experience and, upon approval, said individual shall be "deputized" and authorized to act on the Flood Control District's behalf on all construction inspection and quality control matters. If the Developer's initial construction inspection deposit furnished pursuant to Section 4.3(k) exceeds the amount of $5,000, the Flood Control District shall refund to the Developer up to eighty percent (80%) of the Developers initial inspection deposit within forty (45) days of Flood Engineer's approval of the "deputized" inspector; however, a minimum balance of $5,000 shall be retained in the account. (d) Duly executed irrevocable offer(s) of dedication to the public for flood control purposes, including ingress and egress, for the rights of way deemed necessary by the Flood Control District for the construction, inspection, operation and maintenance of the Flood Control Facilities as provided for in Section 3.3 hereof. (e) Preliminary reports of title dated not more than thirty (30) days prior to date of submission for all property described in the irrevocable offer(s) of dedication. (f) A complete list of all contractors and subcontractors to be performing work on the Flood Control Facilities, including the corresponding license number and license classification of each. On said list, the Developer shall also identify its designated superintendent for construction of the Flood Control Facilities. (g) A construction schedule which shall show the order and dates in which the Developer and the Developer's contractor proposes to carry on the various parts of work, including estimated start and completion dates. As the construction progresses the Developer shall update said construction schedule upon request. (h) The final mylar plan and profile sheets for the Flood Control Facilities and assign their ownership to the Flood Control District prior to the start of construction of each Flood Control Facility. (i) Certificates of insurance and endorsements as required by Section 4.12., below. (j) The confined space procedure as required by Section 4.6, above. (k) Zone 7 Maintenance deposit required by Section 4.3(1), above. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 19 Section 4.8. Bondin!! Requirements. The Developer shall post such subdivision bonds as are required by the City in connection with the recording of all subdivision maps for the Property. The Developer's obligations pursuant to this Section will be considered satisfied, in part, through the contract performance bonds to be provided by the Developer's contractors pursuant to Section 4.3( e) hereof. Section 4.9. Additional Conditions to be Satisfied durin!! Construction. (a) The Developer shall make a good faith effort to complete construction of the Flood Control Facilities within eighteen (18) consecutive months after the date of issuance of the Bonds It is expressly understood that since time is of the essence in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, failure of the Developer to perform the work within the agreed upon time shall constitute authority for the Flood Control District to cause the remaining work to be performed and the cost thereof to be paid from the Acquisition Account, and should the amounts held in the Acquisition Account prove insufficient to complete the Flood Control Facilities, the Flood Control District may require the Developer's surety to pay to the Flood Control District the penal sum of any and all bonds. . (b) Construction of the Flood Control Facilities shall be on a five (5) day, forty (40) hour workweek with no work on Saturday, Sundays or days designated by the Flood Control District as legal holidays, unless otherwise approved by the Flood Control District. If the Developer feels it is necessary to work more than normal forty (40) hour workweek or on holidays, the Developer shall make a written request for permission from the Flood Control District to work the additional hours (with a copy to the City Engineer). The request shall be submitted to the Flood Control District at least 72 hours prior to the request date for additional work hours and state the reasons for the overtime and the specific time frames required. The decision granting permission for overtime work shall be made by the Flood Control District at its sole discretion and shall be final. If permission is granted, the Developer will be charged the cost incurred at the overtime rates for additional inspection time required in connection with the overtime work in accordance with Ordinances Nos. 671 and 749 ofthe County, including any amendments thereto. Section 4.10. Inspection: Completion of Construction. The Flood Engineer shall have primary responsibility for providing inspection of the work of construction of the Flood Control Facilities to ensure that the work of construction is accomplished in accordance with the Plans approved by the Flood Control District. Flood Control District staff shall have access to the Construction Site at all reasonable times for the purpose of accomplishing such inspection. The Developer is to provide the Flood Control District with written notice that it considers construction of a Flood Control Facility to have been completed consistent with the Plans and, upon receipt of said notice, Flood Control District's staff will provide written confirmation that construction of the Flood Control Facility is complete consistent with the approved Plans and the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Upon receipt of both written notices, the Flood Engineer will in a timely CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 20 manner notifY the City Engineer, the Developer and the Administrator that the Flood Control Facility has been satisfactorily completed and that the Developer is to proceed with the recording of a Notice of Completion with respect to such construction pursuant to Section 3093 of the California Civil Code. The Developer is to provide a duplicate copy of the recorded Notice of Completion to the City Engineer, the Administrator and the Flood Control District. Within a reasonable time following receipt of the duplicate copy of the recorded Notice of Completion and the Developer's compliance with other provisions of Section 3.2 hereof, the Flood Control District will issue the written notice required by said Section 3.2 that it will accept the Flood Control Facility into its maintained system. Section 4.11. Maintenance of Facilities; Warranties. The Developer shall maintain the Flood Control Facilities in good and safe condition until the Acceptance Date of the Flood Control Facilities. Prior to the Acceptance Date, the Developer shall be responsible for maintaining the Flood Control Facilities in proper operating condition, and shall perform such maintenance on the Flood Control Facilities as the Flood Engineer reasonably determines to be necessary. As of the Acceptance Date, the performance bond provided by the Developer for the Flood Control Facilities pursuant to Section 4.3(e) hereof shall be reduced to an amount equal to 10% of the original amount thereof and shall serve as a warranty bond to guarantee that the Flood Control Facilities will be free from defects due to faulty workmanship or materials for a period of 12 months from the Acceptance Date, or the Developer may elect to provide a new warranty bond or cash in such an amount. As of the Acceptance Date, the Developer shall assign to Flood Control District all of the Developer's rights in any warranties, guarantees, maintenance obligations or other evidence of contingent obligations of third persons with respect to the Flood Control Facilities. Section 4.12. Insurance Requirements. Without limiting or diminishing the Developer's obligation to indemnify or hold the Flood Control District, the County, the City, Community Facilities District and the Authority harmless pursuant to Section 5.6 hereof, the Developer shall procure and maintain or cause to be procured and maintained, at its sole cost and expense the following insurance coverages, or alternate coverages acceptable to the County's Risk Manager, during the term of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement: (a) Commercial General Liability: Commercial General Liability insurance overage, including but not limited to, premises liability, contractual liability, products and completed operations, explosion, collapse, use of cranes, and other heavy equipment and underground hazards, personal and advertising injury covering claims which may arise from or out of the Developer's performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy shall name by endorsement the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." Policy's limit ofliability shall not be less than $2,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Joint CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 21 Community Facilities Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. (b) Vehicle Liability: The Developer shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in an amount not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Policy shall name by endorsement the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." (c) Worker's Compensation Insurance: The Developer shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws of the State of California. Policy shall include Employers' Liability (Coverage B) including Occupation Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident. Policy shall be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of the Flood Control District, the County, the City, the Community Facilities District, the . Authority; and if applicable, to provide a Borrowed Servant/Alternate Employer Endorsement. General Insurance Provisions - all lines: (i) Any insurance carrier providing insurance coverage hereunder shall be admitted to the State ofCalifomia and have an A.M. Best rating of not less than an A:VIII (A:8) unless such requirements are waived, in writing, by the County's Risk Manager. (ii) The Developer's insurance carrier(s) must declare its insurance deductibles or self-insured retentions. If such deductibles or self-insured retentions exceed $500,000 per occurrence such deductibles and/or retentions shall have the prior written consent of the County's Risk Manager before the commencement of operations under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Upon notification of deductibles or self-insured retentions which are deemed unacceptable to the Flood Control District, at the election of the County's Risk Manager, the Developer's carriers shall either: (i) reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as respects this Agreement with the Flood Control District, or (ii) procure a bond which guarantees payment oflosses and related investigations, claims administration, defense costs and expenses. (iii) The Developer shall cause its insurance carrier(s) to furnish the Flood Control District and the City with (i) a properly executed original certificate(s) of insurance and certified original copies of endorsements effecting coverage as required herein; or (ii) evidence of coverage acceptable to the County's Risk Manager that may include original certified copies of policies including all endorsements and all attachments thereto, showing such insurance is in full force and effect. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 22 (iv) Further, said certificate(s) and endorsements to policies of insurance shall contain the covenant of the insurance carrier( s) that it shall provide no less than sixty (60) days written notice be given to the Flood Control District, the Community Facilities District, the City and the Authority prior to any material modification or cancellation of such insurance. In the event of a material modification or cancellation of coverage, this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall terminate forthwith, unless the Flood Control District, the Community Facilities District, the City and the Authority receives, prior to such effective date of said material modification or cancellation, another properly executed original certificate of insurance and original copies of endorsements or certified original policies, including all endorsements and attachments thereto evidencing coverages and the insurance required herein is in full force and effect. Individual(s) authorized by the insurance carrier to do so on its behalf shall sign the original endorsements for each policy and the certificate of insurance. (v) The Developer shall not commence construction of the Flood Control Facilities until the Flood Control District, the County and the City have been furnished either original certificate(s) of insurance and certified original copies of endorsement, policies of insurance including all endorsements and any and all other attachments as required in this Section, or other evidence of coverage acceptable to County's Risk Manager. (vi) It is understood and agreed by the parties hereto and the Developer's insurance company(s) that the certificate(s) of insurance and policies shall so covenant and shall be construed as primary insurance, and the Flood Control District's insurance and/or deductibles and/or self-insured retentions or self-insured programs shall not be construed as contributory. (vii) The Developer may pass down to its principal contractors the insurance obligations contained herein and will require it principal contractors to name on their insurance policies by endorsement the Flood Control District, the County, the City, Community Facilities District, the Authority, their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, City Council, Board of Directors, Legislative Body, elected officials, employees, agents or representatives as "Additional Insureds." Copies of such certificates and endorsements shall be provided to the Flood Control District and the City. Section 4.13. Ownership of Facilities. (a) Notwithstanding the fact that some or all of the Flood Control Facilities may be constructed in dedicated street rights of way or on property which is owned by or has been or will be dedicated to the Flood Control District, the County or the City, a Flood Control Facility shall be and remain the property of the Developer until Acceptable Title to parcels not owned by the Flood Control District, the County or the City with respect to such Flood Control Facility is conveyed to the Flood Control District or the City, as appropriate, as provided herein. Ownership of said parcels by the Developer or other third parties shall likewise not be affected by any agreement that the Developer may have entered into or may enter into with the City pursuant to the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66410 et seq. ofthe Code, and the provisions of this Section shall control. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 23 (b) The City is to own, maintain and operate those catch basins, connector pipes and laterals, within those street rights-of-way within the City in which the Flood Control Facilities are located. The City, by execution of this Agreement, grants to the Developer the right to construct the Flood Control Facilities and to the Flood Control District the right to inspect, operate and maintain the Flood Control Facilities located within those City rights-of-way in which the Flood Control Facilities are located. (c) The County is to own, maintain and operate those catch basins, connector pipes and laterals, within those street rights-of-way within the County in which the Flood Control Facilities are located. The County, by execution of this Agreement, grants to the Developer the right to construct the Flood Control Facilities and to the Flood Control District the right to inspect, operate and maintain the Flood Control Facilities located within those County rights-of-way in which the Flood Control Facilities are located. (d) The City is to maintain the structural integrity of the bridge structure within its rights-or-way for North Loop Road and its right-of-way for Butterfield Stage Road at the Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel and the portion of the bridge structure between the two rights-of-way and grants to the Flood Control District the right to remove silt and debris from this portion of the Santa Gertrudis Channel. (e) The City is to maintain the structural integrity of the bridge structure within its right-of-way for Butterfield Stage Road at the Long Valley Wash Channel and grants to the Flood Control District the right to remove silt and debris from this portion of the Long Valley Wash Channel. (f) The Developer, or its successor(s) in interest, is to maintain the structural integrity of the bridge structure located on Long Valley Wash Channel at North Loop Road and grants to the Flood Control District the right to remove silt and debris from this portion of the Long Valley Wash Channel. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 24 ARTICLE V REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND COVENANTS; INDEMNIFICATION Section 5.1. Revresentations. Warranties and Covenants of the Develover. The Developer makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the. benefit of the Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Authority, as of the date hereof: (a) Organization. The Developer represents and warrants that it is a limited liability company duly organized and validly existing under the laws ofthe State, is in good standing under the laws of the State, and has the power and authority to own its properties and assets and to carry on its business as now being conducted and as now contemplated. (b) Authoritv. The Developer represents and warrants that it has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Developer. (c) Binding Obligation. The Developer represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Developer and is enforceable against the Developer in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (d) Completion of Flood Control Facilities. The Developer covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to do all things that may be lawfully required of it in order to cause the Flood Control Facilities to be completed in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (e) Proposed Improvements Not Shown on Plans. The Developer covenants that it shall submit plans and specification to the Flood Control District, and obtain the Flood Control District's approval thereof, prior to construction any proposed improvements within the Flood Control District's future rights-of-way, as set forth herein, which are not shown on the Plans. (f) Compliance with Laws. The Developer covenants that, while the Flood Control Facilities are owned by the Developer or required pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be maintained by the Developer, it will not commit, suffer or permit any of its agents, employees or contractors to commit any act to be done in, upon or to the Flood Control Facilities in violation in any material respect of any law, ordinance, rule, regulation or order of any CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 25 governmental authority or any covenant, condition or restriction now or hereafter affecting the Flood Control Facilities. (g) Payment Requests. The Developer represents and warrants that (i) it will not request payment from the Community Facilities District under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement for the acquisition of any improvements that are not part of a Flood Control Facility, and (ii) it will diligently follow all procedures set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (h) Financial Records. Until the final Acceptance Date of all Flood Control Facilities, the Developer covenants to maintain proper books of record and account for the Flood Control Facilities and all costs related thereto. The Developer covenants that such accounting books will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and will be available for inspection by the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the City and the Authority, and their respective agents, at any reasonable time during regular business hours on two (2) Business Days' prior written notice, subject to mutually acceptable arrangements regarding the confidentiality of proprietary data. (i) Hazardous Materials. The Developer represents and warrants that neither the Developer, nor any subcontractor, agent or employee thereof will use, generate, manufacture, procure, store, release, discharge or dispose of any Hazardous Material on, under or about the Construction Site or the Flood Control Facilities or transport any Hazardous Material to or from the Construction Site or the Flood Control Facilities in violation of any federal, state or local law, ordinance, regulation, rule, decision or policy statement regulating Hazardous Material. G) Permits. The Developer covenants that it will pursue in a commercially reasonable manner all governmental or other permits or licenses required to proceed with the construction of the Flood Control Facilities and that it will pay all fees relating thereto. The Developer represents and warrants that to the best of the Developer's knowledge, as of the date hereof, there is no material legal impediment to the Developer's proceeding with and completing the construction of the Flood Control Facilities or to the development of the Construction Site as contemplated by the Developer, except for government or other permits to be obtained. (k) Environmental Matters. The Developer represents and warrants that to its present actual knowledge all governmental agencies have complied with, CEQA as required for the construction of the Flood Control Facilities and their conveyance to the Flood Control District. Section 5.2. Representations. Warranties and Covenants of the Authoritv. The Authority makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit ofthe Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Developer: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 26 (a) Authoritv. The Authority represents and warrants that the Authority has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all actions necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Authority. (b) Binding Obligation. The Authority represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Authority and is enforceable against the Authority in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Payment Requests. The Authority represents and warrants that Authority will follow all procedures applicable to it set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) Financial Records. Until the final Acceptance Date, the Authority covenants to maintain, or cause to be maintained, books of record and account for the Special Taxes and the Bonds in accordance with the requirements of the Code. The Authority covenants that such accounting books will be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to governmental entities, and will be available for inspection by the Developer and its agents at any reasonable time during regular business hours on two Business Days prior written notice. Section 5.3. Renresentations, Warranties and Covenants of the Flood Control District. The Flood Control District makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the Authority, the City, the County and the Developer: (a) Authority. The Flood Control District represents and warrants that the Flood Control District has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of the Flood Control District. (b) Binding Obligation. The Flood Control District represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Flood Control District and is enforceable against the Flood Control District in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Comnletion of Flood Control Facilities. The Flood Control District covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 27 expeditiously all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits, processing and approving Plans and inspecting the Flood Control Facilities in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) Payment ReQuests. The Flood Control District represents and warrants that the Flood Control District will follow all procedures applicable to it set forth in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 5.4. Representations. Warranties and Covenants of City. The City makes the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the Authority, the Flood Control District, the County and the Developer: (a) Authority. City represents and warrants that City has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of City. (b) Binding Obligation. City represents and warrants that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of City and is enforceable against City in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Completion of Flood Control Facilities. The City covenants that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take expeditiously all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits and processing and approving Plans in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. (d) Pedestrian Bridge/Long Valley Wash Channel. The City coyenants that it will cause all plans that are submitted to it regarding the pedestrian bridge that is to cross the Long Valley Wash Channel to also be provided to the Flood Engineer for review and approval. (e) CEOA Compliance. On November 26,2002, the City Council of the City adopted Resolution No. 02-111 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT PREPARED FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN AND RELATED PLANNING APPLICATIONS ACTIONS AND ADOPTING THE ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT, AND THE STATE CEQA GUIDELINES, A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND A STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN, LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF BUTTERFIELD STAGE ROAD AND NICOLAS ROAD. (PLANNING APPLICATION 94- CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 28 0076)." The Notice of DetermiD.ation for the Roripaugh Ranch Final EIR' approved by Resolution No. 02-111 was posted in the Riverside County Clerk's Office on November 27,2002 as required by law. All of the public improvements which are to be funded by Temecula Public Fmancing AuthoritY Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), including, without limitation, the . public improvements identified in this Agreement, were described, evaluated, and . studied as part of the Roripaugh Ranch EIR and Council Resolution No.. 02-111. Additionally, on August 24,2004, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority adopted Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA. PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02," which was subsequently amended by Resolution No. TPFA 04-10 adopted on September 28,2004. In Section 14 of Resolution No. TPFA 04-08, as amended, the Board found that: "no significant changes have occurred with respect to the project or the environment which require further study or which render invalid the conclusions and findings of the Ronpaugh Ranch EIR. No facts exist upon which any findings pursuant to Sections 15162, 15163, 15165 of the State CEQA Guidelines could be based to require the preparation of a subsequent EIR, Supplemental EIR or addendum to an EIR." Section 5.5. Representations. Warranties and Covenants of County: The County makes. the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the Authority, the City, the Flood Control District and the Developer: . (a) Authority. CoUnty represents and warrants that County has the power and authority to enter into this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and has taken all action necessary to cause this Joint Community Facilities Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Joint Community Facilities Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of County. (b) Binding Obligation. County represents and warrantS that this Joint Community Facilities Agreement is a valid. and binding obligation of County and is enforceable against County in accordance with its terms, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors' rights in general and by general equity principles. (c) Completion of Flood Control Facilities. The County covenants. that it will use its reasonable and diligent efforts to take expeditiously all actions that may be lawfully required of it in issuing permits and processing and approving Plans in accordance with this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 5.6; The Developer Indemnification. The Developer agrees to protect, indemnify, defend and .hold the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County, the City, and their respective directors, officers, Board of Supervisors, Board of Directors, the Legislative Body, City Council, elected officials, CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 29 employees, representatives and agents (the "Indemnified Parties"), and each of them, harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, expenses, suits, actions, decrees, judgments, awards, reasonable attorney's fees, and court costs which the Indemnified Parties, or any combination thereof, may suffer or which may be sought against or recovered or obtained from the Indemnified Parties, or any combination thereof, as a result of or by reason of or arising out of or in consequence of (a) the approval of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, (b) the acquisition, construction, or installation of the Flood Control Facilities, (c) for the design, construction, or failure of the Flood Control Facilities or an assertion, pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of the California Constitution, the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution, or any other law or ordinance which seek to impose any other liability or damage whatsoever, from the diversion of the waters from their natural drainage patterns, or from the discharge of drainage from the Flood Control Facilities, (d) the untruth or inaccuracy of any representation or warranty made by the Developer in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement or in any certifications delivered by the Developer hereunder, or (e) any act or omission of the Developer or any of its contractors, subcontractors, or their respective officers, employees or agents, in connection with the Flood Control Facilities. If the Developer fails to do so, the Indemnified Parties, or each of them, shall have the right, but not the obligation, to defend the same and charge all of the direct or incidental costs of such defense, including reasonable attorneys' fees or court costs, to and recover the same from the Developer. No indemnification is required to be paid by the Developer for any claims, losses, expenses, suits, actions, decrees, judgments, awards, reasonable attorney Fees, and court costs (a) arising directly from the willful misconduct or sole and active negligence of the Indemnified Parties or (b) arising from the use or operation of a Flood Control Facility after the Acceptance Date of the Flood Control Facility, unless such claim, loss or expense results from the defective or improper design, acquisition, construction or installation of such Flood Control Facility by the Developer or its agents. The provisions of this Section shall survive the termination of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 30 ARTICLE VI MISCELLANEOUS Section 6.1. DeveloDer as IndeDendent Contractor. In performing under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, it is mutually understood that the Developer is acting as an independent contractor, and not as an agent of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County or the City. Neither the Authority, the Flood Control District, the County nor the City shall have any responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or supplier of the Developer. The Community Facilities District shall not have any responsibility for payment to any contractor, subcontractor or supplier of the Developer unless such entity or individual is specifically listed as a payee on the Payment Request submitted by the Developer pursuant to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement in which case the Community Facilities District shall be responsible for making such payment only if such Payment Request is approved pursuant to the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and only from funds available in the hnprovement Fund.. Section 6.2. Other Al!reements. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as affecting the Flood Control District, the County, the City or the Developer's respective duty to perform their respective obligations under other agreements, land use regulations or subdivision requirements relating to the development of the Property, which obligations are and shall remain independent of the Developer's rights and obligations, and the Flood Control District, the County and the City's rights and obligations, under this Joint Community Facilities Agreement; provided, however, that the Developer shall use its reasonable and diligent efforts to perform each and every covenant to be performed by it under any lien or encumbrance, instrument, declaration, covenant, condition, restriction, license, order, or other agreement, the nonperformance of which could reasonably be expected to materially and adversely affect the acquisition, construction and installation ofthe Flood Control Facilities. Section 6.3. Bindinl! on Successors and Assil!ns. Neither this Joint Community Facilities Agreement nor the duties and obligations of the Developer hereunder may be assigned to any person or legal entity other than an affiliate of the Developer without the written consent of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County and the City, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Neither this Joint Community Facilities Agreement nor the duties and obligations of Authority, the Flood Control District, the County the City or the Community Facilities District hereunder may be assigned to any person or legal entity, without the written consent of the Developer, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. The agreements and covenants included herein shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of any partners, permitted assigns, and successors- in-interest ofthe parties hereto. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 31 Section 6.4. Amendments. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement can only be amended by an instrument in writing executed and delivered by the Authority, the Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Developer. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Exhibit B may be supplemented consistent with Section 3.4 and 3.6 above. Section 6.5. Waivers. No waiver of, or consent with respect to, any provision of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement by a party hereto shall in any event be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by such party, and then such waiver or consent shall be effective only in the specific instance and for the specific purpose for which it was given. Section 6.6. No Third PartY Beneficiaries. Other than the Community Facilities District when formed, no person or entity shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Joint Community Facilities Agreement (either expressed or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Developer (and its respective successors and assigns), any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 6.7. Notices. Any written notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication to be given hereunder shall be given to the party entitled thereto at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party may provide to the other party in writing from time to time, namely: Flood Control District: Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Attn: Mark H. Wills 1995 Market Street Riverside, California 92501 Telephone: (951) 955-1200 Fax: (951) 955-788-9965 County: Director of Transportation County of Riverside 4080 Lemon Street, 8th Floor Riverside, California 92501 Telephone: (951) 955-6740 Fax: (951) 955-3198 City: Director of Public Works City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Telephone: (951) 694-6411 Fax: (951) 694-6475 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 32 Authority: Temecula Public Financing Authority Treasurer 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Telephone: (951) 694-6430 Fax: (951) 694-6479 Developer: Richard K. Ashby Ashby USA, LLC 407 East Harrison Street Corona, California 92879 Telephone: (951) 898-1692 Fax: (951) 898-1693 Each such notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the party to whom it is addressed (a) if personally served or delivered, upon delivery, (b) if given by electronic communication, whether by telex, telegram or telecopier, upon the sender's receipt of a document confirming satisfactory transmission, (c) if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, deposited with the United States mail postage prepaid, 72 hours after such notice is deposited with the United States mail, (d) if given by overnight courier, with courier charges prepaid, 24 hours after delivery to said overnight courier, or (e) if given by any other means, upon delivery at the address specified in this Section. Section 6.8. Jurisdiction and Venue. Each of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Developer (a) . agrees that any suit action or other legal proceeding arising out of or relating to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement shall be brought in state or local court in the County of Riverside or in the Courts of the United States of America in the district in which said County is located, (b) consents to the jurisdiction of each such court in any suit, action or proceeding, and (c) waives any objection that it may have to the laying of venue or any suit. action or proceeding in any of such courts and any claim that any such suit, action or proceeding has been brought in an inconvenient forum. Each of the Authority, the Community Facilities District, the Flood Control District, the County, the City and the Developer agrees that a final and non-appealable judgment in any such action or proceeding shall be conclusive and may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by law. Section 6.9. Attornevs' Fees. If any action is instituted to interpret or enforce any of the provisions of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, the party prevailing in such action shall be entitled to recover frorn the other parties thereto reasonable attorney's fees and costs of such suit (including both prejudgment and post judgment fees and costs) as determined by the court as part of the judgment. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 33 Section 6.10. Governinl! Law. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shaH be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State applicable to contracts made and performed in the State. Section 6.11 Usal!e of Words. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shaH include the feminine. Section 6.12. Counterparts. This Joint Community Facilities Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shaH be deemed an original. Section 6.13 Interpretation. The parties to this Joint Community Facilities Agreement and their counsel have reviewed and revised this Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities in an agreement are to be resolved against the drafting parties shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 6.14. Desil!nation of Party's Representative. Each partyis to prepare a certificate designating the person or persons that are to serve as the liaison between the Flood Control District, the County, the City, and the Community Facilities District regarding design, engineering and construction of the Flood Control Facilities. The certificates are to contain an original and specimen signature of each designated person. The certificates are to be provided to the Flood Control District, the County, the City, and the Community Facilities District at the time the series of the Bonds are issued. [Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank] CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 34 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Joint Community Facilities Agreement as ofthe day and year first hereinabove written. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By By: WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer Chairman, Board of Supervisors of the Flood Control and Water Conservation District ATTEST: NANCY ROMERO, Clerk to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors By: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN, County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By By: GEORGE A. JOHNSON Director of Transportation MARION ASHLEY Chairman, Board of Supervisors ATTEST: NANCY ROMERO, Clerk to the Board of Supervisors By: Deputy Clerk CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 35 . CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: City Clerk By: Mayor By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By: Peter Thorson TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ATTEST: Secretary By: Chairperson, Board of Directors By [Signatures continued on next page] CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy 36 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Ashby Development Company, Inc., a California Corporation, its Managing Member By: Justin K. Ashby, President By: USA Investment Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, its Member By: USA Commercial Mortgage Company a Nevada corporation, its non-Member Manager By: Joseph D. Milanowski, President 37 EXHIBIT A Proposed Boundary Map of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy A-I >ON E-<c:r ;18 o. ~~@ O~E-< ~~~@'~~ ~e~~~~ ~~QP::O~ B~~6~~ ~~~~8~ ClS:ld~~o ~....:lU~~~ ~g5~~ < tsP-<><,--, E-< p::<b rn "~; ~o E-<U - ~ o - f-< ttl :I: 00 ] o IXl " oSt>ll .... .8 o ~ M.8 ~~ gJl 00"", ,,&:;.... oStU~ ....;;tU ~ g"Ol s 5 Of-< ".... '" oS 0._ ...,e:oS ... 0 ~ ~ u....... " " .... ;.::: .... 0 p;.. .... oS '""' Ci ;:l ~~< ..,f o o N ~ ",'':: .... 0 goS o ;:l .g < Cit>ll .... .8 o 0 ].~ Op;.. IXl 0 ".- oS:O ~~ ~.:'.l .5 5 " " .... 8 o " c::lf-< o ~ ~ a.~ .8.... "0 e :' 0 IS cS !3 IS.. g:.=: .tU~~a I~~~~ ~ o'~ g ~ .... 0 p;.. U +> 09 ~Q)tIl ~ 01 '" '1 ~ f I~ ~8S~ ~ .23 !:l ~ "0 0 .... oSo -!a"o as~ ....OS€ 'E oS 5.8::s 8 t;j ~ rs8 ~''''''''''E'' ,-.. g g ~.~ oS 11) eN IXl < Ci .8 ~ on _ on ~ ~ ;:; I: 000 ~ "Of' \0 - .Q ('t"') N 00 a r!.'00 00 It)=\O~-~-N ~ 'i'~q~9~~~ ~ ~8o=o=oo"O= ....~o"'~--co Nat('l')J:lN OOOOi:dJ:! ).IQ...;r!.f:job obob ~ ~~~oo~('t"')~~ \0 W2 v - 0 W2 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ..( ~ ~ oc: " , .... 00 00 on on on ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t.t-4" 2l 00''::= 0 ~ 0 .- 8 .- ~ "'" ".., .~ =s = "0 a .c: otU ;:l"ooS'<1' ..= p;...... 0 :>.- 0 {/J ~ 0 u e:Q ~o ~'a ;:2 ~ 8:~ '.g N. t:i ~ 0-,: C';S ~ Q) ~~~~~]~ .~ u -a<." 5 ~ o~~bOef-le oS '" p...8 <8.... tU .... ,,'':: g:.=: 0 .... tU'C 0 OJ 'OJ e: t;j 0 oS ~ e:..8 u 0 ~ .., .Q = N p;.. .... 1) '':: ~ .", ;:l 0 0 0 ll> 0 I J;;4 0 1:'::= u'~.;3 . 3""'8""'1'lCi;:l 0 ..,as o~oo~< "z ~1BZtU";"Ot>lloS!5 Ii g.....;;:s! !;l.~ ='il ..=.....Eoge:~~o- .....p.. 8"..... "00 .-l1)OO >u _00 ~oSo~i:iZoS~]~ ~ '':: e: 0 OoS 1) - "< .= e.!! ~ ~ !;l.8 Op;.. IXl 0 ".- oS:O ~~ M] " " ~ 5 oof-< ..= .... = 0 C1) 0 0 cd -'"' '.;::l" "'~p.."" g s'S 0 " 0 '" :g ~ u .g .g 8.,g"" ~ ..,..... ~ 8 -e 0 "'i3 " '" = ..= fir ~]....: .23 Ei <8 '" 3 o ~ Q,) u a go:o;Eip.. ~~;: ~ ~ ~ ~.,g !a ~<i:iZ~.s f i%\ ~ U JZ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. e III '.i! .. ~ Ci .. "' I .. f u ~ 'iJ " :> i:iZ .... o i o ~ i o u EXHIBIT B FLOOD CONTROL FACILITIES Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Acquisition Cost Facility No.1: Long Valley Wash: (Sta. 38+00.00 to 98+41.53)1 A variable width (150':l: to 340':l:) by 6,065':l: long earthen and Armorflex lined trapezoidal channel extending from 500':l: west of Butterfield Stage Road to East Tract Boundary, with transition structures, two road crossings, flow-by basin, , rip rap dissipaters, headwalls, wing walls, miscellaneous cutoff walls, security fencing and gates, and a 16' wide paved maintenance road paralleling both sides of the channel. $ 7,762,515 Facility No.2: Santa Gertrudis Channel: (From Habitat Area to Westerly Boundary ofM.W.D. Easement)1 A variable width (300':l: to 540':l:) by 8,170':l: long earthen and Armorflex lined trapezoidal channel extending from westerly boundary ofM.W.D. easement to habitat area, with transition structures, two road crossings, flow-by basin, rip rap dissipater, headwalls, wing walls, miscellaneous cutoff walls, security fencing and gates, and a 16' wide paved maintenance road paralleling both sides of the channel. $ 3,161,086 Facility No.3: Line "F" (Sta. 30+29.42 to 31+63.86) Consists of 134.44':l: of 60" RCP from centerline of Butterfield Stage to inlet structure easterly ofR.O.W., joining existing 60" CIPP, with headwall, wingwall, inlet structure, trash rack, and concrete aprons. $ 49,195 IThe work required to complete bolh channels will include, but is not limited to, all necessary clearing and grubbing, temporary bypass channel construction and removal, dewatering, temporary shoring, grading, excavation, backfill, construction of any necessary appurtenances including junction structnres, cutoff walls, access roads, right-of-way fencing, flow by basins and any necessary work or utility relocation costs required to facilitate the completion of the channels. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy B-1 Facility No.4: Line "J" (Sta. 10+00.00 to 20+39.56) Consists ofI,039.32'~ of 72" RCP from westerly of R.O.W. of Butterfield Stage to inlet structure easterly ofR:O.W., with manholes, junction structures, headwall, inlet structure, and concrete aprons. Facility No.5: Line "M" (Sta. 9+91.25 to 19+23.50) Consists of 428.87'j: of 54" RCP and 490.00"j: of 42" RCP from outlet structure westerly ofR.O.W. of Butterfield Stage to transition structure at station 19+23.50, with manholes, junction structures, headwall, and outlet structure TOTAL Acquisition Cost $ 397,111 $ 400,787 $11,770,694 CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy B-2 T~ I - -- rj \ I . . " l: -~-.:..:-.:"~:::.=---:~.,- -. --,-. " ~ ~ --';-;;--r> I- n --1 --.'..-- I - \ ~k I ,/ I I ;i~' ..- I "'....; ':.1; f:;~ ~-!l f:;!: :----- "'-, ::';; .., .I - _'1- ~..,.... _ --""""'-:-;Q-.. ',--- ":i"" 1::;':1 I I'f~-':: ~! ,nF I I , ! I::: I_LL/' I ,'--, "" II! - ",! 11 I: ',I! ! /~::-'-~I II I: 10 ~j " ! _/---'/i~'<:-.j , ~ri ry\ I ,'/ I ,-~,,, 1-" , __ J::I II ' ~ 1'1 ' , ,I', I.j; 'I 'I ' ~ " :!. ' 'I J' ,;0 I I' i~1 '\ i,'~ 1',/--1 "n ,: ,: "i ii' i:, /__/\' \\ [ " '::: '-t-i:l 'I I: -------/F----,-,: ,-.I: :1: I,,; ::,' If \ , -- \ I ~I I "1" , ,,', >,'1', I' 1/ ;:"1' i'\\ .\ I ----- ___/' - ,,;1:: ~ ' ,> ! " ' 'I r \ :;';1' 'I' I! I ';" f \ \, \ \ .~\__ ,l~,;i,~ :/ I \_J---)/-- - - I~ ,r I/"~>::O:~~l -/' -'La-Serena Way ->;:;~p-:;>rf.~r,.l;~l r, ' ./', I '/-,-;-.)::'i\ll!l \;,'\:; , 11- / , " /1111" , ! __L, )_1'\" 1,(, 1/ ;--- I Ilr.', I, 'II II \ " - I ' '~" ,I, ,,, I " \ \ ;; \; I;, \" -_/- /--- I '-'(/) i-' "I :: \~-1/,'~ ,\ \.-L, /,,;:1'\ '1'\:: \\ II /':/t-'\ ~ II \1 J \/\ 'i--11 ~,\ II 1).-1 I '..- '\\\':1" I--"-r'---TJ-- \\\ \\ \', 1, 'I~ " \ /-'-- ,'I\! "I'. "~I' I I ~L. ',\\ \1 \'. -~ \:1 \ _",,_k ", I ",II ,I! '("I i !,_,,"/c---,_ ',III! II,! '1 1'-,-.0 ! I "I'\'\'! i I I., i - ,/ \\~ \\ II ~ I \', I f,_,jJ,_/ I ';1)\\ \'3,) \; I 1 (I ,1,\, \, ! -....., ,_____ I~ ,\\ I, \ .i I\:::>~L b ~ \'~\ " '_-==-:~~'-'-)'L--' " \\..\ \:~~ I~-- I = ~:\\'::\ , -- - I t l \,\\\\ \\\', r 1-1 '" ,\1,'" .",. \/ '" \, ,\,,\ \:~\''---:'~/'\ I ",-,1\ '\\,\ \\ \ \ I ;',' \~ \~\ \ ',.. '; I .,~.' :;~\\\:~;~\\ i'l : ' ii I , , 1/ l ~'I \ EXHIBIT "B-2" , RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WA TER , \ CONSERVA TION IMPROVEMENTS ---l RORIPAUGH RANCH TRACT 29353 \ I I , \ , \ SD ,INE "F" i ! \ Butterfield Stage Road Sta. 193+06 ------ "I ::\\,-::,\) ;t\Xi :'~f<_'-,-*, ,,->4:\\ :_~~\)-:--~~,;, '\':\~:~;\:>" ''\ \ ' <~~\~\ :< ~~->\, "~ ,,:~'~;, -, '''>"",'" '" \;r>-:',~\, ~ / / / ;t ill , ~ ~~' ~ ~ -'1-. ~~ '- ~~ ..,.""",~ _c. - - - '" __ _ ----tt, . \ ;";I;;~~,,: ';"~:::lc'~;c-~'~i~l:rl~~~i.~~ ' ~\\\ ~ L--------~l 'p ;\ m I '" il~! '1\ j J \J~~~__L, ,-'," L.'!,if ?"o ',','",,:;-, _. :---~-~-:rl-=.;~ -~.~-.~-.r - -r'!':':'!I' iji i;' I '. ~; a ';'1' ro'!: I "'cJ "-'<j <~~~>~-~, ---- . ij~.. ~-.~ -:-_-':::-'-.~ .- ~Q S if ~ ---"--.. ~- ~ ,,-- ~ I. -'--.- ji i ./ .~------, l/ ! :, I: i " i:.i " , (!;-!- ~, I. 1\ \ ~:-T-- I, 1 I // I , I ,1,T":;i!: I~t~)~-- ~ EXHIBIT "C-2" I "'-:-~c~IJ! : HI' il:i RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WA TER II, /[< )'-'-,J. ~.:l-_-,---- CONSERVATION PARCELS AND EASEMENTS /~\--I ',::1:: : I ',~\ I' \ RORIPAUGHRANCH TRACT29353 1_--/ ,.__--., I" ';\ ,f ': . ff ,;, \ 1 I, __\, ,I I. '-r-:I. \ -----L ,-- \- \ . 11'1' I" \", I ! -~\\\~'ri,!::i ,II :;\ 'i); SO tNE '~" I, , \ \ , \.-_'" .,: ~"_ ~.J I '--'-/ -11,1~_____- >c,~~~:If?)0fT/~~Y~~\li ~(/-:i.i~erenaWajt -- .. ,::Y~' I/-/=~~_;= ;Hil \1\ I Ii, \ II Butterfield Stage Road , 1,/," ,\ \'. ',.I'li.lt' 'g'! Sta. 193+06 _~' '<--,~~_d."~'\ I', --- : "--"'1 \1 ,I --- /' .'. \ i \1 \1 \'\ --- i i \ ill.1 II, I \ \ ,', :1 I. \. -- _~--/'I~' '\111 1\ -1'- - I / \ / I " \ 1\\~; \ " i \' /J ,t.' j'\\'1 II' I 1==, -~- h~ d! I, \ ,>_.l('!~\ \.-\-), '/I\J(~~__II::~~~ \:, \\ \\\ I ,,/,./ III 'I"~ '".Jil, , ,\\ \ ,'I . ;' ------....- '\\~ \ t "\, - ~r----'\-- I -- \1\ \, ~ 1 -. , / '.\Illi'\ I \' \--i,'ii~ '\~,l.~ \~.', j ;\ '-r:~, !-,~ \\ \ I . '_::..,.,,'O!, i I '\11\ \( , -L_Jj::Oc...1 '\\ '\ Ii, lirr i tl'::---I ~\~(~\: ~T~T--I, __ ,I 1i\\,':i\\"--- I I ,'"-- --=0;8 ~"\\ \: ';~_ I 'H~\ " '. '1 "!"~\~\, ,.;.,.-/-,\ ;.\':'f/,_ \\ ~'~.\ ~~K -, " <:-;:~~\~'\:, \-:\'~" " \ I I J ---~---- fill STORMORAIN EASEMENT . INGRESS/EGRESS EXHIBIT D PAYMENT BOND (Public Work - Civil Code Section 3247 et seq.) The makers of this Bond are as Principal and Original Contractor and , a corporation, authorized to issue Surety Bonds in California, as Surety, and this Bond is issued in conjunction with that certain public works contract dated as of July I, 2003, between Principal, as owner, for dollars ($ ) the total amount payable. THE AMOUNT OF THIS BOND IS 100% OF SAID SUM. Said contract is for public work of those certain as defmed and described in said agreement entitled: "Joint Conununity Facilities Agreement by and among Riverside County Flood Control And Water Conservation District, County of Riverside, City of Temecula, Temecula Public Financing Authority, and Ashby USA, LLC" dated as of November 1,2004 The beneficiaries of this Bond are as is stated in 3248 of the Civil Code and the requirements and conditions of this Bond are as is set forth in Sections 3248, 3249, 3250 and 3252 of said Code. Without notice, Surety consents to extension of time for performance, ,change in requirements, amount of compensation, or prepayment under said Contract. Signed and Sealed this Day of 200_ (Finn Name - Principal) (Business Address) Affix Seal if Corporation By: (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) (Title) (Corporation Name - Surety) (Business Address) Affix Corporate Seal By: (Signature - Attached Notary's Acknowledgment) ATTORNEY-IN-FACT (Title-Attach Power of Attorney) CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy D-l PERFORMANCE BOND The makers of this Bond, as Principal, and as Surety, are held and finnly bound unto hereinafter called the Owner, in the sum of Dollars ($ ) for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally, fmnly by these presents. The condition of this obligation is such, that whereas the Principal entered into a certain contract, hereto attached, with the Owner, dated as of , 200_ for those certain as defmed and described in said agreement entitled: "Joint Conununity Facilities Agreement by and among Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, County of Riverside, City of Temecula, Temecula Public Financing Authority, and Ashby USA, LLC" dated as of November I, 2004. Now therefore, if the Principal shall well and truly perform and fulfill all the undertakings covenants, tenns, conditions and agreements of said Contract during the original term of said Contract and any extension thereof that may be granted by the Owner, with or without notice to the Surety, and during the file of any guarantee required under the Contract, and shall also well and truly perform and fulfill all the undertakings, covenants, tenns, conditions, and agreements of any and all duly authorized modifications of said Contract that may thereafter be made, then this obligation to be void, otherwise to remain in full force and virtue, Without notice, Surety consents to extension of time for performance, change in requirements, change in compensation or prepayment under said Contract. Signed and Sealed this Day of ,200_ (Firm Name - Principal) Affix Seal if Corporation (Business Address) By: (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) (Title) (Corporation Name - Surety) (Business Address) . Affix Corporate Seal By: (Signature - Attach Notary's Acknowledgment) ATIORNEY-IN-FACT (Title-Attach Power of Attorney) CFD No, 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy D-2 EXHIBIT E FORM OF PAYMENT REQUEST Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Ashby USA, LLC hereby requests payment of the Purchase Price for the Flood Control Facility described in Attaclunent A attached hereto. Capitalized undefined terms shall have the meanings ascribed thereto in the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, dated as of November 1, 2004 (the "Joint Community Facilities Agreement"), by and among Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the "Flood Control District"), County of Riverside (the County"), City of Temecula (the "City"), Ternecula Public Financing Authority and Ashby USA, LLC (the "Developer"). In connection with this Payment Request, the undersigned hereby represents and warrants to the Flood Control District as follows: 1. The undersigned is a Party Representative, qualified to execute this request for payment on behalf of the Developer and is knowledgeable as to the matters set forth herein. 2. The Developer has submitted or submits herewith to the Flood Engineer and the City Engineer as-built drawings or similar Plans and specifications for the Flood Control Facility for which payment is requested, and such drawings or plans and specifications, as applicable, are true, correct and complete. 3. The Flood Control Facility has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor, and in accordance with all applicable Flood Control District standards and the requirements of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and the as-built drawings or similar Plans and specifications referenced in paragraph 2 above. 4. There has not been filed with or served upon the Developer notice of any lien, right to lien or attaclunent upon, or claim affecting the right to receive the payment requested herein which has not been released or will not be released simultaneously with the payment of such obligation, other than material men's or mechanics' liens accruing by operation of law. Copies of lien releases for all work for which payment is requested hereunder are attached hereto. 5. The representations and warranties of the Developer set forth in Section 5.1 of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement are true and correct on and as of the date hereof with the same force and effect as if made on and as of the date hereof. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy E-l I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the above representations and warranties are true and correct. Date: Developer ' By: Party Representative CFD No, 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy E-2 VJ ... VJ o U ~ <~ ...'" ZU f;I;l< ::;' =~ Uf;I;l <~ ...0' ~'~ ... Z f;I;l ~ ~ ... ., '" ~ o :5 - .. c E ~ o u ~ 'ii E o u o - .!! ~ " 0. o ~ " o i.: i:: .8 .2 E a. ::J'r;: Z u 13 :c ~ c -~ o U ... .. 0'" ;;- ~ ~S " u c o " - ~ o '" ~S'S'ti (7) a~.2E eOLL.!! oii:ii~C u '" ~s"8o co c-3.2:S co u LL ll'I ::J - >-i3 Ot3m 'C'" ~ " ~ O.!:! ~ ~ <0 ~'" " Il c_ .. 0 ~ > G.E Citib c::1lI:W lO :i~ i 08& Il 't: .... ~ c ~ " - ~ o ~ '" -.. c :: ~::E c E.!! ~B- N "Cl (; iDle o o ",z iii E 1l , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - N '" .... "' <0 ... 0) '" 0 :: N '" .... "' <0 ... 0) '" 0 - - - - - - - - N o o o o o o o o o .;; " ;; " ~ C' '" " 0: , C ~ ]j ~ 0 0 E .... ..: ~U >> go ;U ~" fj .g ~ ~ ~&1 " ' .. ~ <>''' '!::'C ~~ ~.. N"" Cfe "'l:l o " 08 z'" o 0 "" 0 u~ APPROVAL BY THE FLOOD ENGINEER The Flood Engineer confirms that the Flood Control Facility described in Attachment A-I has been constructed in accordance with the Plans therefor. The Actual Cost of each Flood Control Facility as described in Attachment A-I has been reviewed, verified and approved by the Flood Engineer. The Purchase Price for said Flood Control Facility is established at $ . Payment of the Purchase Price for the Flood Control Facility is hereby approved. Date: FLOOD CONTROL ENGINEER By: CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy E-4 00 f-< '" o U ....:;J ,;;l <Eo< Eo<U z< Iiol' ::tEo< =00 Uliol <;;l .0' !=:~ <Eo< Z Iiol ::t ~ l:l. ~ ~ .c '" ~ e = CD .. c E ~ '0 U .. li 0. E o u S tl 'c ";j 2i '0 :> c o U " o o ii: i.: C 1: 0 E :g, ~ 'C Z u tl ~ l!! C !::~ C U LL .. ULL ..... ~ ~ ~ ~8 o 5 c e ~ 2i " cS'g1j 0) S~,gb Eou..!! <i:" ~c U " ~S"tl c'!!8i: OJ (Q i3 u: ti dii~Q U 1:" ~ 5 .... 0- ~! ~" '" 5 co ;"0 ~ > as iitsb cca~ 10 ~-E:; 086 5 'c ... ~ 'E ::l .. - ~ o ~ M -.. i: :: ::l~ c E.!! ..a N =: i: " u iii: C o "z iii E .. ., . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - '" M ... '" '" .... <0 0> 0 :: '" ~ :! '" ~ .... <0 0> 0 ~ - - ~ ~ ~ N o o o o o o o o o on , ~ -c !!l '" " ~ C' " ex: C ]j ~ 0 {!. ~ 0( '" u ..... , ~~ ~g. -"u gj', " ~ Co" 'i=::~ ~~ ~" ",,,, 9"0 8~ 08 Zoo 00 '" 0 u~ EXHIBIT F LICENSE AGREEMENT The RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL CONSERVATION DISTRICT, hereinafter called "DISTRICT", TEMECULA, hereinafter called "CITY", hereby agree as follows: AND WATER and the CITY OF RECITALS A. Pursuant to the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, hereinafter called the "AGREEMENT", dated as of November 1, 2004 by and among DISTRICT, CITY, Temecula Public Finance Authority and Ashby USA, LLC, hereinafter called "DEVELOPER", DEVELOPER is to construct approximately 6,065 lineal feet of the Long Valley Wash Channel that is to be a variable width, earthen and Armorflex lined trapezoidal channel extending from Station No. 38+00.00 to Station No. 98+41.53 and includes a 16 feet wide paved maintenance roads paralleling both sides of the channel and a pedestrian bridge ("CHANNEL") that is within the boundaries of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "Community Facilities District"). B. CHANNEL has been designed to collect and convey storm and flood waters emanating from the Long Valley Wash watershed. Pursuant to said AGREEMENT, DISTRICT is to accept CHANNEL right of way for ownership upon its completion of construction and transfer of the necessary fee interest to DISTRICT. Said right of way, hereinafter called the "CHANNEL RIGHT-OF - WAY", which consists of three (3) parcels and is shown in concept in red on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, and does not include any road or pedestrian crossing to be owned by either CITY or DEVELOPER. ' C. CHANNEL is an essential and critical component of the proposed flood protection and drainage infrastructure for the Long Valley Wash drainage area. Upon acceptance by DISTRICT, CHANNEL will become an integral element of DISTRICT'S maintained system of flood protection works. D. The flood hazard associated with Long Valley Wash is sporadic in nature; thus, portions of the CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY may be utilized for certain public recreation uses including pedestrian, equestrian and bicycling. CFD No, 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-l E. As set forth herein, DISTRICT is willing to allow the public to utilize the CHANNEL RIGHT -OF- WAY for purposes of accommodating appropriate recreational uses, provided (i) said uses do not compromise CHANNEL's primary flood protection purpose, (ii) said uses do not unduly interfere with DISTRICT'S ability to operate and maintain CHANNEL and (iii) DISTRICT is held harmless and indemnified against any claims that may result from the public's use of CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY for recreational purposes. F. As set forth herein, CITY is willing to extend an easement to DISTRICT, for the removal of silt and debris at road crossings, and the CITY is willing to indemnifY and hold DISTRICT harmless against any claims resulting from the public's use of the RCFC PARCEL or CITY's responsibilities in connection therewith or the condition thereof. G. It is in the public interest to proceed with this License Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto mutually agree as follows: ARTICLE I DISTRICT shall: I. Grant to CITY a license to utilize CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY for public recreation purposes which are not incompatible with CHANNEL's primary flood protection purpose and function and which do not otherwise interfere with or impair the DISTRICT'S ability to operate and maintain CHANNEL or any of its appurtenant works. Said license shall remain in effect indefinitely so long as CITY's use of the CHANNEL RIGHT -OF- WAY is so limited. 2. Give written notice to CITY of any use of CHANNEL RIGHT -OF- WAY that is not in conformity with this License Agreement or which may adversely affect the flood protection function of CHANNEL, and grant to CITY thirty (30) days from and after such notice to correct any such nonconforming use. 3. With regard to the use of CHM'NEL RIGHT-OF-WAY as set forth herein, DISTRICT reserves the right to require remediation, and, if remediation is unsuccessful, to terminate this License Agreement if, in the opinion of the General Manager-Chief Engineer, the public's use of the CHANNEL RIGHT-OR-WAY results in, or contributes to, a public hazard, a public nuisance, a degradation of water quality, or any other matter of substantive concern to the DISTRICT. CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-2 ARTICLE II CITY shall: 1. Within CHANNEL RIGHT-OR-WAY, assume sole responsibility for ensuring the public's safety and enjoyment thereof, including but not limited to assuming all liability associated with the recreational use of CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY, including claims of third persons for injury or death or damage to property. Said obligation shall not include any inverse condemnation liability of DISTRICT by reason of the location of CHANNEL RIGHT-OF - WAY or CHANNEL unless such liability is the result of CITY's operations or use of the property by the public pursuant to CITY's actual or tacit consent. 2. Within the CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY, or otherwise associated with this License Agreement, indemnify and hold DISTRICT, its Board of Supervisors, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of CITY, its officers, agents, employees, subcontractors, independent contractors, guests and invitees for property damage, bodily injury or death (CITY employees included) or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, related to or in any manner connected with or arising from the public's use and responsibilities in connection therewith of the CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY or the condition thereof, and CITY shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, DISTRICT, its Board of Supervisors, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors, in any legal action based upon such alleged acts or OmtSSlons. ARTICLE IV It is further mutually agreed: I. Each party, as to any claim or liability arising out of any act or omission with reference to any work to be performed by or authority delegated to such party as a result of this License Agreement, shall save, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the other party, their respective officers and employees from all liability from death or injury to person, or damage to property, or claim therefore. 2. DISTRICT reserves the right to terminate any use granted pursuant to this license, if for any reason whatsoever, DISTRICT determines that said use of the CHANNEL RIGHT-OF-WAY is not compatible with CHANNEL's primary flood protection function and purpose or said use unduly interferes with DISTRICT's ability to operate and maintain CHANNEL. 3. Any waiver by DISTRICT or by CITY of any breach of anyone or more of the terms of this License Agreement shall not be construed to be a waiver of any CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-3 subsequent or other breach of the same or of any other term hereof. Failure on the part of DISTRICT or CITY require exact, full and complete compliance with any terms of this License Agreement shall not be construed as in any marmer changing the terms hereof, or estopping DISTRICT of CITY from enforcement hereof. 4. If any provision in this License Agreement is held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, void, or unenforceable, the remaining provisions will nevertheless continue in full force without being impaired or invalidated in any way. 5. This License Agreement is to be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 6. Any written notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication to be given hereunder shall be given to the party entitled thereto at its address set forth below, or at such other address as such party may provide to the other party in writing from time to time, namely: RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 1995 Market Street Riverside, CA 92501 Telephone: (909) 955-1200 Fax: (909) 788-9965 CITY OF TEMECULA P. O. BOX 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 Telephone: (909) 694-6411 Fax: (909) 694-6475 Each such notice, statement, demand, consent, approval, authorization, offer, designation, request or other communication hereunder shall be deemed delivered to the party to whom it is addressed (a) if personally served or delivered, upon delivery, (b) if given by electronic communication, whether by telex, telegram or telecopier, upon the sender's receipt of a document confirming satisfactory transmission, (c) if given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, deposited with the United States mail postage prepaid, 72 hours after such notice is deposited with the United States mail, (d) if given by overnight courier, with courier charges prepaid, 24 hours after delivery to said overnight courier, or (e) if given by any other means, upon delivery at the address specified in this Section. 7. Any action at law or in equity brought by any of the parties hereto for the purpose of enforcing a right or rights provided for by the License Agreement, shall be tried in a court of competent jurisdiction in the County of Riverside, State of California, and the parties hereto waive all provisions of law providing for a change of venue in such proceedings to any other county. 8. This License Agreement is the result of negotiations between the parties hereto, and the advice and assistance of their respective counsel. The fact that this License Agreement was prepared as a matter of convenience by DISTRICT shall have no import or significance. Any uncertainty or ambiguity in this License Agreement shall not be construed against DISTRICT because DISTRICT prepared this License Agreement in its final form. CFD No, 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCFA Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-4 9. This License Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive state of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, it connection therewith. This License Agreement may be change or modified only upon the written consent of the parties hereto. [Balance of Page Intentionally Left Blank] CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on (to be filled in by Clerk ofthe Board) RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RECOMMEND FOR APPROVAL: By: By: WARREN D. WILLIAMS General Manager-Chief Engineer JAMES A. VENABLE Chairman, Board of Supervisors ofthe Flood Control and Water conservation District ATTEST: Nancy Romero, Clerk of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District By: Deputy APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM C. KATZENSTEIN, County Counsel By: Deputy County Counsel CITY OF TEMECULA ATTEST: City Clerk By: Michael S. Naggar, Mayor By: Susan W. Jones, CMC APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney By: Peter Thorson CFD No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) - JCF A Flood Control Facilities - Execution Copy F-6 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT LONG VALLEY WASH RECREATIONAL TRAILS MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR LONG V ALLEY WASH RECREATIONAL TRAILS This Maintenance Agreement for Long Valley Wash Recreational Trail is made and entered into as of January 11, 2004 by and between [Roripaugh Ranch Homeowners Association, a California non-profit corporation} ("Association"), Ashby USA, a California limited liability Company ("Developer") and the City of Temecula, hereinafter called "City." In consideration of the mutual promises set for the herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The parties agree that this Agreement is made for the purposes and with respect to the facts set forth below, which are true and correct: a. Pursuant that certain Joint Community Facilities Agreement dated as of January I 1,2005 ("JCFA") by and among Riverside County Flood Control And Water Conservation District ("District"), City, Temecula Public Finance Authority ("Authority") and Developer, Developer is to construct approximately 6,065 lineal feet of the Long Valley Wash Channel that is to be a variable width, earthen and Armorflex lined trapezoidal Channel extending from Station No. 38+00.00 to Station No. 98+41.53 and includes a 16 feet wide paved maintenance roads paralleling both sides of the Channel and a pedestrian bridge ("Channel") that is within the boundaries of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "Community Facilities District"). b. Channel has been designed to collect and convey storm and flood waters emanating from the Long Valley Wash watershed. Pursuant to said JCFA, District is to accept the Channel right of way for ownership upon its completion of construction and transfer of the necessary fee interest to District. Said right of way, the trails to be constructed thereon, and all improvements currently on the property or which may be constructed on the property by the City is specifically described on Exhibit "A," attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Channel Right of Way"). c. Channel is an essential and critical component of the proposed flood protection and drainage infrastructure for the Long Valley Wash drainage area. Upon acceptance by District, Channel will become an integral element of District's maintained system of flood protection works. d. The flood hazard associated with Long Valley Wash is sporadic in nature; thus, portions of the Channel Right of Way may be utilized for certain public recreation uses including pedestrian, equestrian and bicycling. e, Accordingly, the City and the District entered into that certain License Agreement, Dated as of January 11, 2005 ("RCFCD License Agreement"). Pursuant to the RCFCD License Agreement, District is willing to allow the public to utilize the Channel Right of Way for purposes of accommodating appropriate recreational uses, provided (i) said uses do not compromise Channel's primary flood protection purpose, (ii) said uses do not unduly interfere with District's ability to operate and maintain Channel and (iii) District is held harmless and indemnified against any claims 799677.2 December 27, 2004 that may result from the public's use of Channel Right of Way for recreational purposes, f. Pursuant to the RCFCD License Agreement, the City will assume maintenance responsibilities and liability for the recreational use of the Channel Right of Way. g. Developer will construct multi-purpose trails along either side of the Channel for bicycling, walking, jogging and equestrian uses. h. The Channel Right of Way will be adjacent to the homes that are part of the Association and the Association's common property. Further, the trails to be constructed on the Channel Right of Way will be integrated into the access plan for the Association's common area. Accordingly, Association will derive significant benefits from the maintenance of the public recreational uses of the Channel Right of Way. i. City accepted the responsibility for liability for the public use of the Channel Right of Way and the maintenance of the Channel Right of Way in reliance on the Developer and Association's agreement to contribute to the insurance and maintenance costs for the Channel Right of Way. j. Developer's responsibility for the compliance with Condition 90 of City Resolution No. 02-113, and similar conditions set forth in the Conditions of Approval for the approval of the Specific Plan, Development Plan and the subdivision maps, is fulfilled in part by the City entering into this Agreement. k. Association is a California non-profit corporation which has been formed for the purpose of establishing a homeowners association for _lots within Tract _ adjacent to the Channel Right of Way. 2. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence as of the effective date of the RCFCDD License Agreement and shall continue in perpetuity, unless sooner terminated as provided in this Agreement. 3. Public Access to Channel Right of Way. Association shall permit access to the Channel Right of Way by the public at all times and shall not act or fail to act in such a manner as to preclude access to the Channel Right of Way by members of the public. 4, Maintenance Obligations. Association shall maintain the Channel Right of Way in good and safe condition in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances and regulations, the RCFCD License Agreement, the maintenance requirements set forth Exhibit B to this Agreement, and the City's standard polices for the maintenance of similar spaces, as such policies now exist or as may hereafter be established or amended. Exhibit B is attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. 799677 ,2 December 27, 2004 2 5. Indemnification. Within the Channel Right of Way, or otherwise associated with this Agreement, Association shall indemnify and hold City, Authority, Temecula Community Services District ("TCSD"), County of Riverside ("County"), District and their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors free and harmless from any liability whatsoever, based or asserted upon any act or omission of City, Authority, TCSD, County, and District, or their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors for property damage, bodily injury or death (City, Authority,TCSD, County or District employees included) or any other element of damage of any kind or nature, related to or in any manner connected with or arising from the public's use and responsibilities in connection therewith of the Channel Right of Way or the condition thereof, and Association shall defend, at its expense, including attorneys' fees, City, Authority, TCSD, County, District and their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors, in any legal action based upon such alleged acts or omissions. Association shall defend said persons with legal counsel selected by the City. 6. Insurance. Without limiting or diminishing the Association's obligation to indemnify or hold the City, Authority, TCSD, County, District and their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees and independent contractors harmless from pursuant to this Agreement, Association shall procure and maintain for the duration of this Agreement, at its sole cost and expense, insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property which may arise from or in connection with from the use, occupancy, disuse or condition of the Channel Right of Way in accordance with the insurance requirements set forth below. a. Commercial General Liability Insurance. Commercial General Liability insurance overage, including but not limited to, premises liability. contractual liability, products and completed operations, explosion, collapse, use of cranes, and other heavy equipment and underground hazards, personal and advertising injury covering claims which may arise from or out of the Developer's performance of its obligations hereunder. Policy's limit of liability shall not be less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. Coverage shall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence form CG 0001), including a provision providing for a comprehensive broad form of contractual liability, including leases b. Vehicle Liability Insurance. The Association shall maintain liability insurance for all owned, non-owned or hired vehicles in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence combined single limit. If such insurance contains a general aggregate limit, it shall apply separately to this Agreement or be no less than two (2) times the occurrence limit. c. Worker's Compensation Insurance. The Developer shall maintain Workers' Compensation Insurance (Coverage A) as prescribed by the laws ofthe State of California, Policy shall include Employers' Liability (Coverage B) including Occupation Disease with limits not less than $1,000,000 per person per accident. Policy shall be endorsed to waive subrogation in favor of the Flood Control District, the County, the 799677,2 December 27, 2004 3 City, the Community Facilities District, the Authority; and if applicable, to provide a Borrowed Servant! Alternate Employer Endorsement. Policy Coverage. d. Increases in Policy Limits. The amount of insurance coverage described in this Agreement shall be increased every three (3) years on the anniversary of the effective date of this Agreement in such an amount as the City may reasonably determine based upon inflation, increased liability awards, recommendations of professional insurance advisors and other factors customarily used to determine appropriate levels of coverage of the insurance required by this Agreement. City shall provide written notice to the Association at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the proposed increase in insurance coverage requirements. e. Acceptable Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A:VIII, unless otherwise acceptable to the City and waived in writing by the City. f. Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self- insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option of the City, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured , retentions as respects the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Tenant shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. ' g. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability policy shall contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: (1) Policy shall name by endorsement the City, Authority, TCSD, County, and District, or their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors as "Additional Insureds." The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City, the District or its officers, officials, employees or volunteers. (2) For any claims related to this project, the Association's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, Authority, TCSD, County, and District, or their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors. Any insurance or self- insured maintained by the City, Authority, TCSD, County, and District, or their respective elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors shall be excess of the Association's insurance and shall not contribute with it. (3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City, Authority, TCSD, County, and District, or their respecti ve elected officials, officers, agents, employees, and independent contractors. 799677 ,2 December 27, 2004 4 (4) The Association's insurance shall apply separately' to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability, (5) Each insurance policy required by this clause shall be endorsed to state that coverage shall not be suspended, amended, voided, cancelled by either party, reduced in coverage or in limits except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice by certified mail, return receipt requested, has been given to the City. g. Verification of Coverage. Association shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause and true, correct and complete copies of all policies required by this Agreement. The endorsements shall be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements shall be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements and policies shall approved in writing by the City before the policy goes into effect. h. City May Provide Coverage, In the event the Association fails to procure the necessary insurance coverage, City may procure such coverage and Association shall pay all costs incurred by the City in obtaining such coverage and all costs related to administering such insurance, including but not limited to, staff and attorney expenses, self-insured retentions, premium costs, and increased premium costs. 2. Deposit, Concurrently with the approval of this Agreement. the Association and Developer shall pay to the City the sum of dollars ($ .00) [equal to two years of insurance premiums] as a security deposit for the costs of the insurance policies required by this Agreement. Said deposit shall be returned to the Association and Developer without interest at such time as one thousand seven hundred (1,700) parcels of property have been annexed to the Association. If the deposit is ever used by the City, Developer and Association shall deposit further sums as needed to replenish the deposit. 3. Default. a. Event of Default. Association shall be in default under this Agreement in the event that it fails to perform any obligation under this Agreement and fails to cure said breach within twenty (20) days notice from City ("Event of Default"). b. Remedies for Default. If an Event of Default occurs, then, in addition to any other remedies available to Agency at law and equity: (i) Association shall be liable to Agency for any damages caused by such Event of Default, and Agency may thereafter commence an action for damages against Association with respect thereto; (ii) City may draw upon the deposit described ni Section 3 of this Agreement; and (iii) City may collect the Assessment directly from the members of the Association as described in this Agreement. c. Delay Not Waiver. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, any failure or delay by Agency in asserting any of Agency's rights or remedies as to any Event of Default shall not operate as a waiver of any subsequent Event of Default 799677,2 December 27, 2004 5 or of any such rights or remedies or otherwise deprive Agency of its right to institute and maintain any actions or proceedings that Agency may deem necessary to protect, assert or enforce any such rights or remedies. d. City Right to Association Assessments. In addition to all other remedies available to the City pursuant to this Agreement, in the event the Association in default of one or more of its obligations under this Agreement, City shall have the right to collect the assessments imposed upon the owners of property within the Association for the purpose of paying for the insurance policy or any settlement or judgment. (I) Association and Developer shall establish covenants, conditions, and restrictions upon the property within the tract that will require Association to levy, impose and increase regular and special assessments in an amount sufficient to fund the costs of the insurance policy upon a default by Association in connection with the a default in its obligations under this Agreement (collectively, the "Assessments") (2) Association hereby assigns, conveys and transfers the Assessments to City, which transfer shall be effective upon Association's default pursuant to this Agreement. Such assignment, conveyance and transfer shall entitle City to collect, directly from the owners of the individual parcels within the Association, the proceeds of the Assessments in the event of a default by Association under this Agreement. (3) Association warrants and represents with respect to the Assessments that (i) there has been no prior assignment of Association's interest in the Assessments to any person or entity other than ~ssignee, and (ii) Association's interest in the Assessments is not subject to any claims, setoffs, encumbrances, or deductions. City shall not be liable for any defaults by Association in the performance of Association's duties or obligations with respect to the Channel Right of Way, if any. (4) Association and Developer acknowledges and agrees that that covenants, conditions and restrictions for the properties which are to be a part of the Association ("CCRs") shall contain the requirements set forth in this Agreement and shall be subject to the terms of this Agreement. Developer further acknowledges and agrees that pursuant to Condition 13c. of City Resolution No. 02-113, the City shall not be obligated to record the final maps for the any portion of the Channel Right of Way unti I such time as the CCRs are approved by the City and contain these designated provisions. In the event that for whatever reason, the CCRs are recorded without these provisions, the Develop shall pay to the City the deposit and the yearly insurance costs as described in this Agreement. In addition, Developer acknowledges and agrees that City may withhold building permits for the properties which are a part of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Area until such time as the CCRs are brought into complainance with this Agreement. 9. Representations and Warranties of Association and Developer. The Association and Developer make the following representations, warranties and covenants for the benefit of the City: 799677 ,2 December 27, 2004 6 a, Organization. The Association and Developer each represent and warrant that Association is a , duly organized and validly existing under the laws of the State of California, is in good standing under the laws of the state, and has the power and authority to carryon its business. b. Authority. Association and Developer each warrant and represent that Association and Developer each has the power and authority to enter into this Agreement, and that Association and Developer has each taken all action necessary to cause this Agreement to be executed and delivered, and this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered on behalf of Association and Developer. c. Binding Obligation, Association and Developer each warrant and represent that this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of the Association and Developer and is enforceable against the Association and Developer in accordance with its terms hereof, subject to bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, or other similar laws affecting the enforcement of creditors rights in general and by general equity principles, 10. Integration Clause. This Agreement is intended by the parties hereto as a final expression of their understanding with respect to the subject matter hereof and as a complete and exclusive state of the terms and conditions thereof and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous agreements and understandings, oral or written, it connection therewith. This Agreement may be change or modified only upon the written consent of the parties hereto. 11. Attornev Fees. In the event of any controversy, claim, or dispute relating to this instrument or the breach thereof, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the losing party reasonable attorneys' fees and costs. 12. Interpretation. This Agreement shall be construed according to its fair meaning and as if prepared by both parties hereto. Any rule of law (including without limitation California Civil Code Section 1654) or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this Agreement against the party that has drafted it is not applicable and is hereby waived. 13. No Third Partv Beneficiarv. No person or entity shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Agreement (either express or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than the City and the Association (and their respective successors and assigns), any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement. 14. California Law. This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California, 1/1/ 1/1/ 799677,2 December 27, 2004 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Covenant as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Jeff Comerchero Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 799677.2 December 27, 2004 8 ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Ashby Development Co., Inc., its Managing Partner By: Justin K. Ashby President By: USA Investment Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, its member By: USA Commercial Mortgage Company, a Nevada corporation, its non-Member Manager. By: Joseph D. Milanowski President 799677.2 December 27, 2004 9 [Roripaugh Ranch Homeowners Association, a California non-profit corporation I By: Name: Title: By: Name: Title: 799677.2 December 27, 2004 10 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF CHANNEL RIGHT OF WAY 799677 ,2 December 27, 2004 II EXHIBIT B CITY MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS 799677 ,2 December 27, 2004 12 RESOLUTION NO. TCSD 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT APPROVING JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE FINANCING OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS - RORIPAUGH RANCH WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority intends to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") in order to finance costs of public improvements (the "Improvements") to be constructed within or near the City of Temecula (the "City") and the elimination of a prior fixed assessment lien, as described in the proceedings to form the CFD; and WHEREAS, in order to enable the CFD to finance the Improvements, Section 53316.2 of the California Government Code requires that the Temecula Community Services District (the "TCSD") and the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement prior to the formation of the CFD with respect to the portion of the Improvements to be owned or operated by the TCSD for the CFD; and WHEREAS, a form of joint community facilities agreement - TCSD, by and between the TCSD and the Authority relating to the Improvements to be owned or operated by the TCSD (the "Joint Community Facilities Agreement") has been filed with the Secretary; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors, with the assistance of City staff, has reviewed the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, and the Board of Directors now desires to approve the Joint Community Facilities Agreernent and direct its execution and delivery. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Tem~cula Community Services District as follows: Section 1. Approval of Joint Community Facilities Aqreement. The Board of Directors hereby approves the Joint Community Facilities Agreement in the form on file with the Secretary, and hereby authorizes and directs the President or the Executive Director, each acting alone, to execute and deliver the Joint Community Facilities Agreement in such form together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the Executive Director upon consultation with the City Attorney, the approval of such changes to be conclusively evidenced by the execution and delivery by the TCSD of the Joint Community Facilities Agreement. The Board of Directors hereby declares that the Joint Community Facilities Agreement will be beneficial to the residents residing within the boundaries of the TCSD. Section 2. Official Actions, The President, the Executive Director and the Secretary, and all other officers of the TCSD, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder to implement the Joint Community Facilities Agreement, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, documents and other instruments which they, or any of them, deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution and the Joint Community Facilities Agreement. Section 3. Effectiveness. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District at a meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Chuck Washington, President ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Community Services District, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TCSD 05-_ was duly adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Community Services District on the 11'" day of January, 2005, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC Secretary -2- JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT TCSD '- JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT - TCSD TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) This Joint Community Facilities Agreement (the "Agreement"), dated for convenience as of January 1, 2005, is by and between the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and the Temecula Community Services District (the "Participating Agency"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the Authority is undertaking proceedings to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "CFD") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Act"), and the Authority intends to issue bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds") in order to finance various public improvements to be acquired and constructed in the City of Temecula; and WHEREAS, the improvements to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds may include the improvements described in Attachment A hereto (the "Improvements"), which Attachment is, by this reference, incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the parties hereto expect that the Participating Agency will own and operate the Improvements if they comply with the standards and have been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS, Section 53316.2 of the Act requires that the Authority enter into a joint community facilities agreement with the Participating Agency, prior to the adoption by the Authority of the Resolution of Formation of the CFD, in respect of the Improvements which Improvements are to be financed with the proceeds of the Bonds, and, upon completion, are to be owned and operated by the Participating Agency; and WHEREAS the Authority and the Participating Agency now desire to enter into this Agreement to satisfy the requirements of Section 53316,2 of the Act and to memorialize their understanding with respect to the proceeds of the Bonds and the Improvements, all as more particularly set forth below. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and mutual covenants set forth below, the parties hereto do hereby agree as follows: Section 1. Reservation of Bond Funds. The Authority intends to reserve a portion of the proceeds of the Bonds in an amount necessary to finance a portion of the costs incurred in connection with the acquisition and construction of the Improvements. Said amount, together with any investment earnings thereon, shall be held in an account within the Improvement Fund established for the CFD (the "Improvement Fund") for the sole and exclusive benefit of the CFD, and such amount shall in no way be pledged as security for the Bonds. Other than the funds described in the preceding paragraph, the Authority shall have no obligation to pay for any of the costs of the Improvements, including but not limited to any costs of planning, acquisition, construction, installation or inspection of the Improvements. Section 2. Construction of Improvements, The Improvements have been or will be constructed pursuant to plans and specifications approved by the Participating Agency. The Participating Agency shall not have any liability whatsoever in respect of any work performed in connection with the Improvements; provided that this sentence shall in no way limit any rights the Participating Agency may have against any persons or entities in respect of the acquisition or construction of the Improvements once the Participating Agency accepts title to and control over the Improvements. To the extent that the Participating Agency incurs expenses incident to reviewing and approving design plans and specifications, conducting construction field inspections and otherwise in connection with the design, construction and acceptance of the Improvements, such expenses may be reimbursed to the Participating Agency upon presentation of invoices as to the nature and amount of such costs and expenses, from available amounts in the Improvement Fund, or if there are no such available funds, then from one of the owners of the land in the CFD (as may be required in any applicable subdivision improvement agreements pertaining thereto) or from any other legally available funds. Section 3, Inspection and Acceptance; Use of Bond Funds. The Participating Agency shall cause inspections to be made during the construction of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures for construction projects of a similar nature. Upon completion of construction of the Improvements to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, the Participating Agency shall accept dedication of the Improvements in accordance with its customary procedures, and shall accept ownership, and responsibility for operation of the Improvements conditioned upon the passage to the Participating Agency of fee title clear of all encumbrances and easements not otherwise acceptable to the Participating Agency in its sole discretion, The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility with respect to the ownership or operation of the Improvements unless and until construction has been completed to the satisfaction of the Participating Agency, The Authority shall have no obligation to at any time own or operate any of the Improvements. Section 4, Limited Obligations. All obligations of the Authority under and pursuant to this Agreement shall be limited to the amounts on deposit in the Improvement Fund and described in Section 1 above. No Boardmember, officer or employee of the Authority shall in any event be personally liable hereunder. The sole obligation of the Participating Agency hereunder with respect to the Improvements shall be to inspect and accept the Improvements as described above. The Participating Agency shall have no responsibility or obligation with respect to the Improvements for any action occurring prior to acceptance by the Participating Agency. If, for any reason whatsoever, there are insufficient funds to complete the Improvements or any portion thereof, the Participating Agency shall have no obligation under this Agreement to fund any such shortfall. -2- If the Participating Agency shall fail to perform any of its obligations hereunder, the sole remedy of the Authority shall be the commencement of an action in the Superior Court for specific performance by the Participating Agency of such obligations. Section 5. Termination, Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, this Agreement shall cease to be effective and shall terminate if the first series of the Bonds are not issued by December 31, 2005. If not earlier terminated pursuant to the preceding sentence, this Agreement shall terminate upon acceptance of the ownership and operation of the Improvements by the Participating Agency. Section 6, No Obligation to Form CFD: Agreement of Benefit to Residents. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to form the CFD. Notwithstanding the foregoing, by their respective execution of this Agreement, the Authority and the Participating Agency each declare that this Agreement is beneficial to the residents within the jurisdiction of their respective entities in assuring the provision of financing for a portion of the costs of the Improvements in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. Section 7. Partial Invalidity. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. This Agreement is for the sole benefit of the Authority and the Participating Agency and their successors and assigns, and no other person or entity shall be deemed to be a beneficiary hereof or have an interest herein. """'! Section 9. Execution in Counterparts, This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, ~.."" each of which shalLbe deemed an original. -.' -3- * * * * * * * * * * IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature below, TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT (the "Participating Agency") Date of Execution: January 11, 2005 By: President TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY (the" Authority") Date of Execution: January 11, 2005 By: Executive Director 20009.Gl'J7222 -4- ATTACHMENT A DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES PROPOSED TO BE FUNDED BY TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO, 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) WHICH ARE TO BE OWNED, OPERA TED OR PROVIDED, AS APPLICABLE, BY THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT Sports Park Sports Park at the SE comer of the intersection of North Loop Road and Butterfield Stage Road: Construct 20:t-acre Sports Park including grading, parking, building, lighting landscaping, irrigation, playing fields, basketball courts, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Sports Park. Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park at the SW corner of the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street): Construct 5,l-acre Neighborhood Park including grading, parking, restroom building, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, open grass area, basketball court, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Neighborhood Park. A-I RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF FORMATION OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH), AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN THE DISTRICT, PRELIMINARILY ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE DISTRICT AND SUBMITTING LEVY OF THE SPECIAL TAX AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein - Roripaugh Ranch 03-02" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "District") pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, California Government Code Section 53311 et seq. (the "Law"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention, incorporating by reference a map of the proposed boundaries of the District and describing the public improvements eligible to be financed by the District (the "Facilities"), and the fixed special assessment lien to be eliminated by the District (the "Prior Lien"), the cost of financing the costs of the Facilities and of eliminating the Prior Lien, and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the cost of financing the costs of the Facilities and of eliminating the Prior Lien, and to pay the principal and interest on bonds proposed to be issued with respect to the District, is on file with the Secretary and the provisions thereof are incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing on the District to be held on September 28, 2004; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2004, this Board of Directors adopted a Resolution amending the Resolution of Intention (the "Amending Resolution") to add additional facilities eligible to be funded by the District and to change the date of the public hearing from September 28, 2004 to November 9, 2004; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing to November 23, 2004, on November 23, 2004 this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and again continued the public hearing to December7,2004;and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and adopted a resolution making findings of complexity of the District, and then continued the public hearing to January 11, 2005; and WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held the public hearing as required by the Law and the Resolution of Intention relative to the proposed formation of the District; and WHEREAS, at the hearing all interested persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the Facilities eligible to be funded by the District, the Prior Lien eligible to be eliminated by the District, and the levy of the special tax were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, at the hearing evidence was presented to this Board of Directors on the matters before it, including a report by the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula (the "Report") as to the Facilities eligible to be funded by the District, the Prior Lien eligible to be eliminated by the District, and the costs thereof, a copy of which is on file with the Secretary, and this Board of Directors at the conclusion of the hearing was fully advised regarding the District; and . WHEREAS, written protests with respect to the formation of the District and/or the furnishing of specified types of Facilities or other specific purposes of the District as described in the Report have not been filed with the Secretary by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or property owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax; and WHEREAS, at the hearing a technical change was made to the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District to add a new land classification due to a zoning change to a small portion of the land in the District, and the revised rate and method of apportionment is attached to this Resolution as ExhibitA hereto; and WHEREAS, the special tax proposed to be levied in the District to pay for a portion of the costs of the Facilities and of the elimination of the Prior Lien, as set forth in Exhibit B to the Resolution of Intention, has not been eliminated by protest by fifty percent (50%) or more of the registered voters residing within the territory of the District or the owners of one-half (1/2) or more of the area of land within the District and not exempt from the special tax. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The proposed special tax to be levied within the District has not been precluded by majority protest pursuant to Section 53324 of the Law. On April 10, 2001, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution approving Local Goals and Policies for Community Facilities Districts, and this Board of Directors hereby finds and determines that the District is in conformity with said goals and policies. Section 3. All prior proceedings taken by this Board of Directors in connection with the establishment of the District and the levy of the special tax have been duly considered and are hereby found and determined to be valid and in conformity with the Law. Section 4. The community facilities district designated "Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)" is hereby established pursuant to the Law. Section 5. The boundaries of the District, as described in the Resolution of Intention and set forth in the boundary map of the District recorded on August 31, 2004 in the Riverside County Recorder's Office at Book 58 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts -2- at Page 51 (instrument no. 2004-0691181), are hereby approved, are incorporated herein by this reference and shall be the boundaries of the District. Section 6. The type of facilities eligible to be funded by the District pursuant to the Law, and the fixed special assessment lien eligible to be eliminated by the District pursuant to the Law, are as described in Exhibit A to the Amending Resolution which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. This Board of Directors hereby finds that the Facilities are necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development occurring in the District. The execution and delivery by the Executive Director or the Chairperson, as applicable, of (a) a Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the Authority and the City of Temecula (the "City"), (b) a Joint Community Facilities Agreement between the Authority and the Temecula Community Services District, (c) a Joint Community Facilities District - EMWD among the Authority, the Eastern Municipal Water District and Ashby USA, LLC ("Ashby"), (d) a Joint Community Facilities Agreement among the Authority, the City, Ashby and the County of Riverside (the "County"), and (e) a Joint Community Facilities Agreement among the Authority, Ashby, the City, the County and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, in the respective forms on file with the Secretary, are hereby ratified. This Board of Directors hereby declares that said Joint Community Facilities Agreernents will be beneficial to residents in the area of the District. Section 7. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the District to pay for the Facilities and the elimination of the Prior Lien and/or to pay the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the District issued to finance the Facilities and the elimination of the Prior Lien, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the District, will be levied within the District and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes or in such other manner as this Board of Directors shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within the District, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the proposed District to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit A to this Resolution which Exhibit is by this reference incorporated herein. This Board of Directors hereby finds that the basis for the levy and apportionment of the special tax, as set forth in the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes, is reasonable. Section 8. The Treasurer of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6430, is the officer of the Authority that will be responsible for preparing annually and whenever otherwise necessary a current roll of special tax levy obligations by assessor's parcel number and which will be responsible for estimating future special tax levies pursuant to Section 53340.2 of the Law. Section 9. Upon recordation of a notice of special tax lien pursuant to Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code, a continuing lien to secure each levy of the special tax shall attach to all nonexempt real property in the District and this lien shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid and permanently satisfied and the lien canceled in accordance with law or until collection of the tax by the Authority ceases. Section 10. In accordance with Section 53325.7 of the California Government Code, the appropriations limit, as defined by subdivision (h) of Section 8 of Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, of the District is hereby preliminarily established at $55,000,000 and said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the voters of the District as provided below. The -3- proposition establishing the appropriations limit shall become effective if approved by the qualified electors voting thereon and shall be adjusted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Section 53325.7 of the Law. Section 11. Pursuant to the provisions of the Law, the proposition of the levy of the special tax and the proposition of the establishment of the appropriations limit specified above shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election, the time, place and conditions of which election shall be as specified by a separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Section 12. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 11th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 05-_ was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -4- EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY A Special Tax shall be levied and collected on all Taxable Property located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) ("CFD No. 03-02"). The amount of Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on a Parcel in CFD No. 03-02, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, shall be determined by the CFD Administrator through the application of the procedures described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 03-02, unless exempted by law or the provisions herein, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS In addition to the capitalized terms set forth in the preceding paragraph, capitalized terms used in this Section A shall have the following meanings: "Acre" means 43,560 square feet of land. The Acres for a Parcel means the land area of the Parcel as shown on or determined from the applicable Assessor's Parcel Map. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Acres attributable to each Parcel of Residential Property that is (i) located in a Final Map and (ii) an individual single-family home lot or Condominium shall be computed by the CFD Administrator by dividing the sum of the land area for all such Parcels of Residential Property in the Final Map by the number of such Parcels. The Acres for any leasehold or possessory interest shall be the Acres for the Parcel which corresponds to such leasehold or possessory interest. "Acreage Special Tax" means the special tax set forth in Section C.2 below. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 03-02, including but not limited to the following: (i) the costs of computing the Special Taxes and of preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the CFD Administrator or designee thereof, or both); (ii) the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the Authority, County, City, or otherwise); (iii) the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the fiscal agent or trustee for any Bonds; (iv) the costs of commencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure action arising from delinquent Special Taxes; (v) the costs of the fiscal agent or trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under any Indenture; (vi) the costs of the Authority, City, or designee of complying with arbitrage rebate and disclosure requirements of applicable federal and State of California securities laws, the Act, and the California Government Code, including property owner or Bond owner inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; (vii) the costs associated with the release of funds from any escrow account; (viii) the costs of the Authority, City, or designee related to any appeal of a Special Tax; and (ix) an allocable share of the A-1 salaries of the City staff and City overhead expense directly relating to the foregoing. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts advanced by the City or the Authority for any administrative purposes of CFD No. 03-02. "Assessor" means the County Assessor of the County of Riverside. "Assessor's Parcel Map' means an official map of the Assessor designating parcels of land or Condominium units by number. "Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority. "Board of Directors" means Board of Directors of the Authority, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 03-02. 'Bonds' means any bonds or other indebtedness (as defined in the Act), whether in one or more series, the repayment of which is secured by the levy of Special Taxes on Parcels within CFD No. 03-02. "CFD Administrator' means the Finance Director of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of Special Taxes. "City" means the City of Temecula, California. 'Condominium" means a residential dwelling unit meeting the statutory definition of a condominium contained in the California Civil Code, Section 1351, and for which a condominium plan has been recorded pursuant to California Civil Code, Section 1352. "County" means the County of Riverside, California. "Developed Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property, for which a Final Map was recorded as of the January 1 and a building permit for new construction was issued as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property. "Dwelling Unit Special Tax" means the special tax set forth in Section C.1 below. "Exempt Property" means any Parcel located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 which is exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Final Map" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a (i) final map or parcel map approved by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), (ii) lot line adjustment approved by the City, or (iii) condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting on each July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indenture" means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, trust agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and/or supplemented from time to time, and any instrument replacing or supplementing the same. A-2 "Land Use" means the land use set forth in the Land Use Plan. "Land Use Plan" means the approved land use plan for the Specific Plan. "Lot" means (i) any lot within a Final Map that is located at least partially within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 or (ii) any land within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 that is conveyed, dedicated, or otherwise acquired by or irrevocably offered to the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other governmental agency. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum special tax, determined in accordance with Section C, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property which are not classified as Residential Property, Property Owner's Association Property, or Public Property . "Parcel" means a parcel (i) which is located at least partially within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and (ii) to which an Assessor's parcel number is assigned as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map. "Planning Area" means those planning areas designated by number on the Land Use Plan. "Property Owner's Association Property" means (i) any Parcel for which the owner of record, as determined from the County Assessor's secured tax roll for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, is a property owner's association, including any master or sub-association, (ii) any Lot located in a Final Map that was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and which, as determined from such Final Map, is or will be open space, a private park or recreation facility, or a private street owned by a property owner's association, (iii) any Lot within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and any Parcel for which the Land Use is private mini park or private recreation center, or (iv) any Lot or Parcel which, as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, has been conveyed, irrevocably dedicated, or irrevocably offered to a property owner's association, including any master or sub- association, provided such conveyance, dedication, or offer is submitted to the CFD Administrator prior to the May 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied. "Proportionately" means that with respect to a given classification of property the ratio of the Special Tax to the Dwelling Unit Special Tax or Acreage Special Tax, as applicable, is the same for all Parcels assigned to such classification. For example, levying the Special Tax Proportionately on Parcels of Developed Residential Property means that for all such Parcels the ratio of the Special Tax to the Dwelling Unit Special Tax is the same. "Public Property" means (i) any Parcel for which the owner of record, as determined from the County Assessor's secured tax roll for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, is the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, A-3 or any local government or other governmental agency, (ii) any property within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and which, as determined from such Final Map, is or will be a public street, (iii) any Lot within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and any Parcel for which the Land Use is neighborhood park, sports park, educational, public institutional, habitat, flood control, or landscape slope, unless such Lot or Parcel has an underlying residential land use and the applicable public entity has provided notice to the City that it will not acquire or otherwise take ownership of the Parcel, or (iv) any Lot or Parcel which, as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, has been conveyed, irrevocably dedicated to, or irrevocably offered to the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other governmental agency, provided such conveyance, dedication, or offer is submitted to the CFD Administrator prior to the May 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area as determined from the applicable building permit(s) issued for such structure as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. Such determination shall be final following the final inspection or certification of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s). "Residential Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property, designated with a residential Land Use. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel. "Special Tax Requirement" means (a) that amount with respect to CFD No. 03-02 required in any Fiscal Year to pay (i) for annual debt service on all outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year; (ii) periodic costs on the Bonds, including, but not limited to, the costs of remarketing, credit enhancement, and liquidity facility fees (including such fees for instruments that serve as the basis of a reserve fund in lieu of cash related to any such Bonds) and rebate payments; (iii) the Administrative Expenses; (iv) any reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year or otherwise reasonably expected; (v) any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds established for the Bonds, and less (b) available funds as directed under the Indenture. "Specific Plan" means the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (City of Temecula Resolution 02-112, Ordinance 02-13), as amended. "Taxable Property" means all Parcels which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Taxable Property Owner's Association Property" means all Parcels of Property Owner's Association Property which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. A-4 "Taxable Public Property" means all Parcels of Public Property which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property which are not classified as Developed Property, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property . B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORY Each Fiscal Year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, all Parcels shall be classified as either Taxable Property or Exempt Property. Taxable Property shall be further classified as Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, Taxable Property Owner's Association Property, or Taxable Public Property. Residential Property and Non-Residential Property shall be further classified as Developed Property and Undeveloped Property (hereinafter referred to as "Developed Residential Property," "Developed Non-Residential Property," "Undeveloped Residential Property," or "Undeveloped Non-Residential Property"). For purposes of determining the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax, Developed Residential Property shall be assigned to classifications one through fifteen in Table 1 below based on Residential Floor Area. If a Parcel consists of two or more lots located in a Final Map that was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, each such lot shall be treated as a Parcel and classified independently of the other; however, the aggregate Special Tax for the lots will be levied on the Parcel. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Developed Residential Property shall be the greater of the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax or Acreage Special Tax. If there are two or more residential dwelling units located on a Parcel, the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax for such Parcel shall be the sum of the Dwelling Unit Special Tax for each such residential dwelling unit. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Undeveloped Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, Taxable Property Owner's Association Property, and Taxable Public Property shall be the applicable Acreage Special Tax. A-S 1. Dwelling Unit Special Tax The Dwelling Unit Special Tax rates are shown in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 DWELLING UNIT SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL UNIT FLOOR SPECIAL SPECIAL TAX CLASSIFICATION AREA TAX 1 Residential >5,000 $4,230' 2 Residential >4,400 and <=5,000 $3,995' 3 Residential >4,200 and <=4,400 $3,520' 4 Residential >4,000 and <=4,200 $3,356' 5 Residential >3,800 and <=4,000 $3,192' 6 Residential >3,600 and <=3,800 $3,028' 7 Residential >3,400 and <=3,600 $2,865' 8 Residential >3,200 and <=3,400 $2,701' 9 Residential >3,000 and <=3,200 $2,537' 10 Residential >2,800 and <=3,000 $2,374' 11 Residential >2,600 and <=2,800 $2,210' 12 Residential >2,400 and <=2,600 $2,046' 13 Residential >2,200 and <=2,400 $1,883' 14 Residential >2,000 and <=2,200 $1,719' 15 Residential <=2,000 $1,586' 'Per residential dwelling unit 2. Acreage Special Tax The Acreage Special Tax rates are shown in Table 2 below. TABLE 2 ACREAGE SPECIAL TAX RATES PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION/LAND USE ACREAGE SPECIAL TAX Developed and Undeveloped Residential Property Low Density (L) or Low-Estate Density (L-E) $5,620 Per Acre Low Medium Density (LM) $17,665 Per Acre Medium Density Standard (M1) $17,665 Per Acre Medium Density Clustered (M2) $17,665 Per Acre Developed and Undeveloped Non-Residential Property (NC) $8,247 Per Acre Taxable Property Owner's Association Property $17,665 Per Acre Taxable Public Property $17,665 Per Acre Notwithstanding the above, if the Land Use Plan is amended or the zoning of the Planning Areas is otherwise amended resulting in a Land Use which is not shown in Table 2 above, then the Acreage Special Tax rate applicable to each Parcel to which the new Land Use applies shall be $17,665. In addition, if at any time subsequent to the issuance of Bonds the Land Use Plan A-6 ; is amended or the zoning or configuration of the Planning Areas is otherwise amended, the CFD Administrator shall determine if the Acreage Special Taxes that may thereafter be levied are less than the sum of estimated Administrative Expenses and one hundred ten percent (110%) of the maximum annual debt service for outstanding Bonds. If the amended Land Use Plan, zoning, and/or Planning Area configuration has resulted in such a reduction, then the Acreage Special Tax for each Parcel to which such amendments apply shall be computed using the Acreage Special Tax rate(s) previously applicable to such Parcel. If the previous Land Use for any portion of a Parcel to which the amended Land Use Plan, zoning, and/or Planning Area configuration applies was not low density (L), low-estate density (L-E), low medium density (LM), medium density standard (M1), medium density clustered (M2), or neighborhood commercial (NC) then the applicable Acreage Special Tax rate shall be $17,665. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the CFD Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property, up to 100% of the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax in the case of Developed Residential Property and up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax in the case of Developed Non-Residential Property; Second: If additional Special Taxes are needed after the first step, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property, up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax; Third: If additional Special Taxes are needed after the second step, the Special Tax for Parcels of Developed Property for which the Maximum Special Tax is derived from the applicable Acreage Special Tax shall be increased equally, measured on a percentage basis, from the amounts levied under the preceding Step 1 up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax (i.e., the percentage increase shall be equal for all applicable Parcels, until the Maximum Special Tax is reached); and Fourth: If additional Special Taxes are needed after the third step, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Taxable Property Owner's Association Property and Taxable Public Property up to the applicable Maximum Special Tax. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Taxes levied against any Parcel used as a private residence be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel or Parcels within CFD No. 03-02 by more than ten percent (10%) per Fiscal Year. In addition, under no circumstances will the Acreage Special Tax be levied against Parcels of Developed Residential Property if the Special Taxes which may be levied pursuant to the first and second steps above are equal to or greater than sum of estimated Administrative Expenses and one hundred ten percent (110%) of the then maximum annual debt service for outstanding Bonds. E. EXEMPTIONS The Board of Directors shall not levy a Special Tax on up to 511.11 Acres of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property. If the total number of Acres of A-7 Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property exceeds 511.11, the chronological order in which such property is classified will determine which Parcels are classified as Exempt Property and which are classified as Taxable Property. If a Lot or Parcel is no longer classified as Property Owner's Association Property or Public Property, its status as Exempt Property will be revoked. The following property shall be classified as Property Owner's Association Property or Public Property, as applicable, at the time CFD No. 03-02 is established and shall count toward the limitation of 511 .11 Acres of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property set forth in the preceding paragraph: . Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property: Lots A and B (portion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road), Lot 2 (private mini park), Lot 5 (private recreation center), and Lot 8 (open space) of Tract 29353-1; Lots Hand 5 (open space), Lots A through G and M through 0 (streets), Lots I, J, and K (flood control), Lot L (equestrian trail), Lots 2 and 9 (parks), Lots 10 and 11 (school sites), and Lot 12 (fire station) of Tract 29353-2; and the property described in and conveyed to the City pursuant to a grant deed dated May 21, 2003 and recorded with the County as Document Number 2003-371374. Subject to Section 53317.5 of the Act, if a Lot or Parcel classified as Developed Residential Property is acquired by a public entity by any means, including by negotiated transaction, gift, devise, or foreclosure, such Lot or Parcel will notwithstanding anything else herein be subject to the Special Tax in accordance with the terms for Developed Residential Property. In addition, if a Parcel of Public Property is leased to a non- governmental entity, then the leasehold or possessory interest, in accordance with Section 53340.1 of the Act, shall be subject to the applicable Acreage Special Tax. F. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that the Special Tax may be billed directly and/or may be collected at a different time or in a different manner if necessary or convenient to meet the financial obligations of CFD No. 03-02, or as otherwise determined by the CFD Administrator. The foreclosure remedies provided for in the Indenture shall apply upon the nonpayment of the Special Tax. G. REVIEW AND APPEALS Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax levied on his/her property with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall grant a credit to eliminate or reduce future Special Taxes on the appellant's property. No refunds of previously paid Special Taxes shall be made. A-S H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX 1. Full Prepayment- Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, and Taxable Property Owner's Association Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Parcel of Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property may be prepaid and permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made only if at the time of the prepayment there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Parcel and all other Parcels which are under the same ownership and located within CFD No. 03-02. An owner of a Parcel intending to prepay the Maximum Special Tax shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay, and within 10 business days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the non-refundable deposit determined to cover the cost to be incurred by the CFD No. 03-02 in calculating the prepayment amount. Within 10 business days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount. Prepayment must be made not less than 60 days prior to any redemption date, unless otherwise authorized by the CFD Administrator, for any Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment proceeds. The 'Full Prepayment Amount" means an amount equal to the sum of (1) Bond Redemption Amount, (2) Redemption Premium, (3) Defeasance Amount, and (4) Fees, less the Reserve Fund Credit, where the terms "Bond Redemption Amount,' 'Redemption Premium," "Defeasance Amount,' 'Fees,' and 'Reserve Fund Credit" have the following meanings: "Bond Redemption Amount" means the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed and equals the greater of (a) the quotient derived by dividing (i) the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax, in the case of Residential Property, or Acreage Special Tax, in the case of Non-Residential Property or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property by (ii) the sum of the aggregate Dwelling Unit Special Taxes (for Residential Property) and Acreage Special Taxes (for Non-Residential Property) for CFD No. 03-02 (and excluding from (ii) any Special Taxes which have been prepaid) or (b) the quotient derived by dividing (iii) the applicable Acreage Special Tax by (iv) the sum of the aggregate Acreage Special Taxes (for Residential Property and Non-Residential Property) for CFD No. 03-02 (and excluding from (iv) any Special Taxes which have been prepaid) in each case multiplied by the principal amount of outstanding Bonds rounded up to the nearest $5,000. The aggregate special taxes under (a) and (b) above means the aggregate special taxes upon completion of the development of CFD No. 03-02. Prior to the completion of the development of CFD No. 03-02, the aggregate special taxes under (a) and (b) above shall be as projected by the CFD Administrator. "Redemption Premium" means the Bond Redemption Amount multiplied by the applicable redemption premium, if any, for the Bonds to be redeemed. A-9 "Defeasance Amount" means the amount needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amount until the earliest redemption date for the outstanding Bonds. Credit shall be given for any portion of the Special Tax heretofore paid by the Parcel for which the Full Prepayment Amount is being calculated and which will be, but has not yet been, utilized to pay interest and principal on the Bonds. "Fees" equal the fees and expenses of CFD No. 03-02 related to the Full Prepayment Amount, including, but not limited to, the costs of computing the Full Prepayment Amount, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence that the Maximum Special Tax has been prepaid. "Reserve Fund Credit" shall equal the lesser of (i) the reduction in the applicable "Reserve Requirement," as such term is defined in the Indenture, if any, following the redemption of Bonds from proceeds of the Prepayment Amount or (ii) the amount derived by subtracting the new Reserve Requirement in effect after the redemption of Bonds from proceeds of the Full Prepayment Amount from the balance in the "Reserve Fund," as such term is defined in the Indenture, on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. The CFD Administrator shall remove any portion of the Special Tax which has been enrolled but not paid. With respect to any Parcel that has prepaid the Maximum Special Tax, the Board of Directors shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Parcel, and the obligation of such Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. 2. Partial Prepayment - Developed Property, Non-Residential Property, and Taxable Property Owner's Association Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Parcel of Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property may be prepaid in part as described herein, provided that (i) the Bond Redemption Amount must be an integral multiple of $5,000 and (ii) at the time of the prepayment there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Parcel and all other Parcels which are under the same ownership and located within CFD No. 03-02. The "Partial Prepayment Amount" shall be computed using the methodology in Section H,1 and substituting the portion of the Maximum Special Tax to be prepaid by the Parcel for its Dwelling Unit Special Tax and Acreage Special Tax when determining the Bond Redemption Amount. The owner intending to prepay a portion of the Maximum Special Tax shall notify the CFD Administrator in writing of (i) such owner's intent to partially prepay the Maximum Special Tax, (Ii) the percentage by which the Maximum Special Tax shall be prepaid, and (iii) the company or agency that will be acting as the escrow agent, if applicable, and within 10 business days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the non- refundable deposit determined to cover the cost to be incurred by CFD No. 03-02 in calculating the amount of the partial prepayment. Within 10 business days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such A-10 owner of the Partial Prepayment Amount. Prepayment must be made not less than 60 days prior to any redemption date, unless authorized by the CFD Administrator, for any Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment proceeds. With respect to any Parcel that has prepaid a portion of the Maximum Special Tax, the CFD Administrator shall indicate in the records of CFD No. 03-02 that there has been a partial prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax, the amount of the Maximum Special Tax which has been prepaid, and the amount of the Maximum Special Tax which continue to be levied on such Parcel. The Bond Redemption Amount, Redemption Premium, Defeasance Amount, and Reserve Fund Credit shall be used to pay interest on and redeem Bonds in accordance with the Indenture. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no prepayment shall be allowed unless the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied in CFD No. 03-02 after the proposed prepayment is at least the sum of (i) the estimated Administrative Expenses and (ii) one hundred ten percent (110%) of the annual debt service on the Bonds, taking into account the amount of Bonds to remain outstanding after such prepayment. I. TERM The Maximum Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed 50 Fiscal Years, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006. A-11 JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT EMWD JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT by and among the TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY and ASHBY USA, LLC _. and EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT relating to: Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT THIS JOINT COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is entered into effective as of the 1" day of January, 2005, by and among TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, a joint exercise of powers authority (the "Authority"), ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company ("Property Owner"), and EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT, a public agency organized and existing pursuant to Division 20 of the California Water Code ("EMWD"), and relates to the proposed formation by Authority of a community facilities district to be known as "Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)" (the "CFD") for the purpose of financing certain facilities to be owned and operated by EMWD from proceeds of bonds issued by the proposed CFD, RECITALS: A. The property described and depicted in Exhibit" A" hereto (the "Property") which is located in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, is proposed to constitute the land within the boundaries of the CFD. B. Property Owner intends to develop the Property for residential purposes and has obtained or intends to obtain the necessary development approvals to construct approximately 1,761 detached single family residential units on the Property, as such development may be modified from time to time (the "Project"). C. Property Owner petitioned the Authority to form the CFD for the purpose of financing, among other things, the acquisition and! or construction of various public facilities to be owned and operated by EMWD as described in Exhibit "B" hereto, which facilities will benefit the Project in whole or in part, and will be constructed by or on behalf of Property Owner and ultimately owned and operated by EMWD (the" Acquisition Facilities"). Upon the construction of the Acquisition Facilities by or on behalf of Property Owner and the inspection and acceptance thereof by EMWD as described herein, the Acquisition Facilities shall become part of the EMWD system, D. Property Owner has yet to determine whether it will finance any or all of the Acquisition Facilities with Bond Proceeds (defined below) available for such purpose, The parties hereto acknowledge that the purpose of this Agreement is to satisfy the requirements of the Act (defined below). E, EMWD and Property Owner agree that any Acquisition Facilities to be constructed by Property Owner shall be eligible for acquisition by EMWD and the costs thereof shall be eligible for reimbursement from Bond Proceeds pursuant to this Agreement. F. [intentionally omitted] G. In addition to the Acquisition Facilities, certain facilities to be owned and operated by City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District (collectively, the "City -2- Facilities") are expected to be funded from proceeds of bonds issued by proposed the CFD prior to the funding of Acquisition Facilities. H, Authority will have sole discretion and responsibility for the formation and administration of the CPD. 1. The Board of Directors of the Authority (the "Board of Directors") has, by adoption of Resolution No. TPFA 04-08 on August 24, 2004, declared its intention to form and establish the CFD pursuant to the provisions of the Act (defined below). J. Authority is authorized by Section 53313.5 of the Act to assist in the financing of the acquisition and/ or construction of the Acquisition Facilities. This Agreement constirutes a joint community facilities agreement, within the mearung of Section 53316.2 of the Act, by and among EMWD, Property Owner, and Authority, pursuant to which the CFD, when and if formed, will be authorized to finance the acquisition and/ or construction of all or a portion of the Acquisition Facilities, As authorized by Section 53316,6 of the Act, responsibility for constructing, providing for and operating the Acquisition Facilities is delegated to EMWD. K. The parties hereto find and determine that the residents residing within the boundaries of EMWD, City of Temecula and the CFD will be benefited by the construction and/ or acquisition of the City Facilities and Acquisition Facilities and that this Agreement is beneficial to the interests of such residents. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the murual promises and covenants set forth herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Recitals. Each of the above recitals is incorporated herein and is true and correct. 2. Definitions. Unless the context clearly otherwise requires, the terms defined in this Section shall, for all purposes of this Agreement, have the mearungs herein specified. (a) "Acquisition Facility or Facilities" means those sewer and water facilities listed on Exhibit "B" hereto, which are eligible to be constructed by the Property Owner, acquired by EMWD and paid for with Bond Proceeds. (b) "Acquisition Price" means the amount to be paid out of Bond Proceeds for an Acquisition Facility. (c) "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Chapter 2.5 (commencing with Section 53311) of Part 1 of Division 2 of Title 5 of the California Government Code. (d) "Acrual Costs" with respect to an Acquisition Facility includes: (i) the acrual hard construction costs including labor, materials and equipment costs, (ii) the costs incurred in design, engineering and preparation of plans and specifications, (iii) the fees paid to consultants and government agencies in connection with and for obtaining -3- permits, licenses or other required governmental approvals, (iv) construction management fee of 5% of the costs described in clause (i) above, (v) professional costs such as engineering, legal, accounting. inspection, construction staking, materials testing and similar professional services, (vi) costs of payment, performance of maintenance bonds, and insurance costs (including the costs of any title insurance), and (vii) the value of any real property or interests therein that (1) are required for the construction of the Acquisition Facility such as temporary construction easements, haul roads, etc. and (2) are required to be conveyed with such Acquisition Facility in an amount equal to the fair market value of such real property or interests therein. (e) [intentionally omitted] (f) "Bond Proceeds" or "Proceeds of the Bonds" shall mean those net funds generated by the sale of the Bonds and investment earnings thereon. (g) "Bond Resolution" means the Fiscal Agent Agreement providing for the issuance of the Bonds. (h) "Bonds" shall mean those bonds issued by, or on behalf of the CFD in one or ',more series, as authorized by the qualified electors within the CFD. (i) "City Facilities" means those public improvements to be owned, operated or maintained by the City of Temecula and the Temecula Community Services District identified in proceedings to form the CFD that are eligible to be financed with Bond Proceeds. (j) "EMWD Engineer" means the engineering firm or in-house personnel used by EMWD to determine the value of an Acquisition Facility to be acql!ireS...'Yi~ Bond Proceeds. (k) "EMWD Fees" means water supply development fees, water backup fees, sewer backup fees, sewer treatment capacity charges and all components thereof imposed by EMWD upon the Project. (I) [intentionally omitted] (m) "EMWD Representative" means the EMWD Engineer or his designee, (n) "Field Engineer" shall have the meaning ascribed to the term in Section 7(a)(i) of this Agreement. (0) [intentionally omitted] (p) "Party" or "Parties" shall mean anyone or all of the parties to this Agreement. -4- (q) "Plans and Specifications" shall mean the plans and specifications for the design and construction of an Acquisition Facility as approved by EMWD, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld. (r) "Rate and Method" means the Rate and Method of Apportionment of the Special Tax authorizing the levy and collection of special taxes pursuant to proceedings undertaken for the formation of the CFD pursuant to the Act, (s) "Special Taxes" means the special taxes authorized to be levied and collected pursuant to the Rate and Method, (t) "State" means the State of California. (u) "Substantially Complete" or "Substantial Completion" with respect to an Acquisition Facility means that such Acquisition Facility is substantially complete in accordance with its Plans and Specifications and is available for use by the public for its intended purpose, notwithstanding any final "punch list" items still required to be completed, unless such items are required for the safe operation of such Acquisition Facility, and shall be based upon approval of EMWD's inspectors, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. 3. Proposed Formation of the CFD. Authority will undertake to analyze the appropriateness of forming the CFD to finance the Acquisition Facilities and other facilities. Authority has retained, at the expense of the Property Owner, the necessary consultants to analyze the proposed formation of the CFD. 4. Sale of Bonds and Use of Proceeds. In the event that the CFD is formed, the Board of Directors acting as the legislative body of the CFD may, in its sole discretion, finance the Acquisition Facilities by issuing the Bonds. Nothing herein shall supersede the obligation of an owner of the Property to pay EMWD Fees to EMWD when due as a condition of receiving water and sewer service to the Property. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide a mechanism by which the CFD may issue the Bonds to provide a source of funds to fund the Acquisition Price of Acquisition Facilities. The Bonds shall be issued only if, in its sole discretion, the Board of Directors determines that all requirements of State and Federal law and all Authority policies have been satisfied or have been waived by Authority. In no event shall EMWD or any owner of the Property, including Property Owner, have a right to compel the issuance of the Bonds or the disbursement of Bond Proceeds to fund Acquisition Facilities. 5. [intentionally omitted] 6, Ownership of Acquisition Facilities. The Acquisition Facilities shall be and remain the property of EMWD. -5- 7. Acquisition Facilities. The Parties acknowledge that EMWD may require the Property Owner, pursuant to the EMWD Rules and Regulations, to design, construct and dedicate to EMWD the Acquisition Facilities as a condition to providing water and sewer service to the Property. The following provisions of this Section 7 shall apply solely with respect to those Acquisition Facilities to be constructed by Property Owner and acquired by EMWD with Bond Proceeds: (a) Construction and Acquisition of Acquisition Facilities. (i) The Property Owner will complete the Plans and Specifications for such Acquisition Facilities. The Plans and Specifications shall include EMWD's standard specifications and shall be subject to EMWD approval, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. EMWD agrees to process any Plans and Specifications for approval with reasonable diligence and in a timely manner. The Property Owner may proceed with the construction of any such Acquisition Facilities in accordance with the provisions of Section 7(b) hereof. A qualified engineering firm (the "Field Engineer") shall be employed by Property Owner to provide all field engineering surveys determined to be necessary by the EMWD inspection personnel. Field Engineer shall promptly furnish to EMWD a complete set of grade sheets listing all locations, offsets, etc., in accordance with good engineering practices, and attendant data and reports resulting from the Field Engineer's engineering surveys and/or proposed facility design changes. EMWD shall have the right, but not the obligation, to review, evaluate and analyze whether such results comply with applicable specifications. (ii) A full-time soils testing firm, approved by EMWD, shall be employed by Property Owner to conduct soil compaction testing and certification. Property Owner shall promptly furnish results of all such compaction testing to EMWD for its review, evaluation and decision as to compliance with applicable sp~c!fications, In the event the compaction is not in accordance or compliance with applicable specifications, Property Owner shall be fully liable and responsible therefore. A final report shall be required fully certifying trench compaction efforts prior to acceptance of each of the Acquisition Facilities. (iii) The cost of all surveying, compaction testing and report costs assoCiated with such Acquisition Facilities furnished and constructed by any contractors or sub- contractors (collectively, "Contractors") shall be included among the costs which are eligible to be paid from the Bond Proceeds. (iv) EMWD shall not be responsible for conducting any environmental, archaeological, biological, or cultural studies or any mitigation requirements related to the Acquisition Facilities to be constructed by Property Owner that may be requested by appropriate Federal, State, and/or local agencies. Any such work shall be paid for and such work shall be conducted by, or on behalf of Property Owner and the costs of such work shall be eligible to be paid from the Bond Proceeds, (b) Public Works Requirements. In order to ensure that the Acquisition Facilities to be constructed by the Property Owner and acquired with Bond Proceeds will be constructed as if they had been constructed under the direction and supervision, or under the authority of, the -6- EMWD, so that they may be acquired by the EMWD pursuant to Government Code Section 53313.5, the Property Owner shall comply with all of the following requirements: (i) The Property Owner shall obtain a minimum of three (3) bids from firms reasonably determined to be qualified to construct the Acquisition Facilities in conformance with the Plans and Specifications. (ii) Property Owner shall make arrangements with EMWD to schedule the bid opening, which is to be held at EMWD headquarters, conducted by Property Owner and witnessed by EMWD staff. (iii) The contract or contracts for the construction of such Acquisition Facilities shall be awarded to the responsible bidder(s) submitting the lowest responsive bid(s) for the construction of such Acquisition Facilities. (iv) The Property Owner shall require, and the specifications and bid and contract documents shall require all such Contractors to pay prevailing wages and to otherwise comply with applicable provisions of the State Labor Code, Government Code and Public Contract Code relating to public works projects to the extent applicable to a non-governmental entity constructing infrastructure to be acquired by a public entity. (v) Said Contractors shall be required to furnish labor and material payment bonds and contract performance bonds in an amount equal to 100 percent of the contract price naming the Property Owner and the EMWD as obligees and issued by insurance or surety companies approved by the EMWD. All such bonds shall be in a form approved by the EMWD Representative. Rather than requiring its Contractors to provide such bonds, the Property Owner may elect to provide the same for the benefit of its Contractors. (vi) All such Contractors shall be required to provide proof of insurance coverage throughout the term of the construction of such Acquisition Facilities which they will construct in conformance with the approved Plans and Specifications, (vii) The Property Owner and all such Contractors shall comply with such other requirements relating to the construction of such Acquisition Facilities which the EMWD may impose by written notification delivered to the Property Owner and each such Contractor at any time either prior to the receipt of bids by the Property Owner for the construction of such Acquisition Facilities or, to the extent required as a result of changes in applicable laws, during the progress of construction thereof. In accordance with this Section 7(b), the Property Owner shall be deemed the awarding body and shall be solely responsible for compliance and enforcement of the provisions of the State Labor Code, Government Code, and Public Contract Code to the extent expressly applicable to a non-governmental entity constructing infrastructure to be acquired by a public entity. (viii) The Property Owner shall provide proof to the EMWD, at such intervals and in such form as the EMWD Representative may require, that the foregoing -7- requirements have been satisfied as to all of the Acquisition Facilities constructed by Property Owner, acquired by EMWD and paid for with Bond Proceeds. (c) Inspection; Completion of Constmction. (i) EMWD shall have primary responsibility for providing inspection of the constmction of the Acquisition Facilities constmcted by the Property Owner to ensure that the construction is accomplished in accordance with the Plans and Specifications. EMWD's personnel shall have access to the site of the work at all reasonable times for the purpose of accomplishing such inspection. Upon Substantial Completion of the construction of such Acquisition Facilities by Property Owner, the Property Owner shall notify the EMWD in writing that the constmction of such Acquisition Facilities has been Substantially Completed. (ii) Upon receiving such written notification from the Property Owner, and upon receipt of written notification from its inspectors that construction of any of the Acquisition Facilities by Property Owner has been Substantially Completed, EMWD shall within 15 days notify the Property Owner in writing that the construction of such Acquisition Facilities has been satisfactorily completed. Upon receiving such notification, the Property Owner shall forthwith file with the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a Notice of Completion pursuant to the provisions of Section 3093 of the Civil Code. The Property Owner shall furnish to the EMWD a duplicate copy of each such Notice of Completion showing thereon the date of filing with the County Recorder. Any actual costs reasonably incurred by the EMWD in inspecting and approving the constmction of any Acquisition Facilities by Property Owner not previously paid by the Property Owner shall be eligible to be reimbursed from Bond Proceeds, or shall be directly paid by Property Owner if not reimbursed with Bond Proceeds. (d) Liens. Upon the expiration of the time for the recording of claim of liens as prescribed by Sections 3115 and 3116 of the Civil Code, the Property Owner shall provide to the EMWD such evidence or proof as the EMWD shall require that all persons, firms and corporations supplying work, labor, materials, supplies and equipment on behalf of Property Owner for the construction of any Acquisition Facilities have been paid, and that no claims of liens have been recorded by or on behalf of any such person, firm or corporation. Rather than await the expiration of the said time for the recording of claims of liens, the Property Owner may elect to provide to the EMWD a title insurance policy or other security acceptable to the EMWD guaranteeing that no such claims of liens will be recorded or become a lien upon the Property with priority over the lien of the special taxes to be levied thereon in the proceedings for the formation of the CFD. (e) Acquisition, Acquisition Price; Source of Funds. (i) Provided the Property Owner has complied with the requirements of this Agreement, EMWD agrees to acquire the Acquisition Facilities from the Property Owner. Notwithstanding the above, nothing herein shall be constmed as requiring Property Owner to construct and deliver any Acquisition Facility. The price to be paid by the CFD for the acquisition of such Acquisition Facilities by EMWD (the" Acquisition -8- Price") shall be the lesser of (i) the value of the Acquisition Facilities, or (ii) the total of the Actual Costs of the Acquisition Facilities, or (Iii) the amount otherwise permitted under the Acquisition Agreement between the Authority and the Property Owner. The Property Owner shall transfer ownership of the Acquisition Facilities to the EMWD by grant deed, bill of sale or such other documentation as the EMWD may require. Upon the transfer of ownership of the Acquisition Facilities or any portion thereof from the Property Owner to EMWD, EMWD shall be responsible for the maintenance of the Acquisition Facilities or the portion transferred. (ii) For purposes of determining the Acquisition Price to be paid by the CFD for the acquisition of the Acquisition Facilities by EMWD, the value of such improvements shall be the amount determined by the EMWD Engineer to be the value of the Acquisition Facilities based on the Actual Costs submitted by the Property Owner, as hereinbefore specified; provided, however, that if the EMWD Engineer determines that such Actual Costs, or any of them, are excessive and that the value of the Acquisition Facilities is less than the total amount of such Actual Costs, the Acquisition Price to be paid by the CFD for the acquisition of the Acquisition Facilities shall be the lesser of the value thereof as determined by the EMWD Engineer, or the amount otherwise permitted under the Acquisition Agreement between the Authority and the Property Owner. (iii) Upon completion of the constroction of any Acquisition Facilities by Property Owner, the Property Owner shall deliver to EMWD copies of the contract(s) , with the Contractor(s) who have constrocted the Acquisition Facilities or other relevant documentation with regard to the payments made to such Contractor(s) and each of them for the constroction of such Acquisition Facilities, and shall also provide to EMWD copies of all invoices and purchase orders with respect to all supplies and materials purchased for the constroction of such Acquisition Facilities. EMWD shall require the EMWD Engineer to complete its det~rmination ~Wh.lLva!ue of the Acquisition Faciliges., as promptly as is reasonably possible. (iv) To the extent funds are available therefor in accordance with the Acquisition Agreement between the Authority and the Property Owner, and to the extent otherwise permitted under such Acquisition Agreement, the Acquisition Price of any Acquisition Facilities may be determined and paid out of Bond Proceeds available for such purpose prior to transfer of ownership of the Acquisition Facilities to EMWD upon a determination of Substantial Completion of such Acquisition Facility. Property Owner shall submit a payment request form to the Authority which must also contain therewith approval of EMWD, which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, (v) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, the sole source of funds for the acquisition by EMWD of the Acquisition Facilities or any portion thereof shall be the Bond Proceeds made available by the CFD pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement between the Authority and the Property Owner. If for any reason beyond EMWD's control, the proceedings for the formation of the CFD are not completed or the Bonds are not sold, EMWD shall not be required to acquire any Acquisition Facilities from the Property Owner. In such event, the Property Owner shall complete the design and constroction and offer to the EMWD ownership of such portions of Acquisition Facilities as are required to be constructed by the Property Owner as a condition to -9- recordation of subdivision maps for the Property or any other agreement between Property Owner and EMWD, but need not construct any portion of the Acquisition Facilities which it is not so required to construct. (vi) Any EMWD monetary reimbursements for construction of Acquisition Facilities funded by the CFD will be paid to the CFD to pay down CFD bond debt or otherwise be used by the CFD as permitted under the Act and the Bond Resolution. All other reimbursements due Property Owner for the construction of facilities other than those financed by the CFD shall be addressed in a separate agreement between Property Owner and EMWD. (f) Easements. The Property Owner shall, at the time EMWD acquires the Acquisition Facilities as provided in Section 7(e) hereof, grant to EMWD, by appropriate instruments prescribed by EMWD, all easements on private property which may be reasonably necessary for the proper operation and maintenance of such Acquisition Facilities, or any part thereof. (g) Maintenance. Prior to the transfer of ownership of an Acquisition Facility by the Property Owner to EMWD, as provided in Section 7(e) hereof, the Property Owner shall be responsible for the maintenance thereof and shall maintain and transfer such Acquisition Facility to EMWD in as good condition as the Acquisition Facility was in at the time the Property Owner notified the EMWD that construction of same had been completed in accordance with the Plans and Specifications. (h) Responsibility for Acquisition Facilities. The Parties acknowledge and agree that all responsibility and obligation for the design, construction and dedication of such Acquisition Facilities to EMWD, in accordance with all applicable statutes and the EMWD Rules and Regulations, shall be and remain the responsibility of the Property Owner, The Parties also acknowledge and agree that the construction and acquisition of the Acquisition Facilities to be constructed by Property Owner is a matter between Property Owner and EMWD only, and that the Authority and the CFD shall have no responsibility or liability for on-site inspection or monitoring or for certifying that the provisions of this Section 7 be satisfied, 8. Indemnification. (a) Indemnification by Authority. Authority shall assume the defense of, indemnify and save harmless, EMWD, its officers, employees and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from, any act or omission of Authority with respect to this Agreement and the issuance of the Bonds; provided, however, that Authority shall not be required to indemnify any person or entity as to damages resulting from negligence or willful misconduct of such person or entity or their officers, agents or employees. (b) Indemnification by Property Owner. Property Owner shall assume the defense of, indemnify and save harmless Authority, CFD and EMWD, their respective officers, employees and agents. and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from, any act or omission of Property Owner with respect to this -10- Agreement. and the design, engineering and construction of the Acquisition Facilities constructed by Property Owner; provided, however, that Property Owner shall not be required to indemnify any person or entity as to damages resulting from negligence or willful misconduct of such person or entity or their officers, agents or employees. (c) Inderrmification by EMWD. EMWD shall assume the defense of, inderrmify and save harmless, Authority, CFD and Property Owner, their respective officers, employees and agents, and each and every one of them, from and against all actions, damages, claims, losses or expenses of every type and description to which they may be subjected or put, by reason of, or resulting from, any act or omission of EMWD with respect to this Agreement, and the design, engineering and construction of the Acquisition Facilities constructed by EMWD; provided, however, that EMWD shall not be required to indemnify any person or entity as to damages resulting from negligence or willful misconduct of such person or entity or their officers, agents or employees. 9. Allocation of Special Taxes. The Board of Directors, as the legislative body of the CFD, shall annually levy or cause to be levied the Special Tax as provided for in the formation proceedings of the CFD. The entire amount of any Special Tax levied by the CFD shall be allocated to the CFD. 10. Amendment and Assignment. This Agreement may be amended at any time but only in writing signed by each party hereto. This Agreement may be assigned, in whole or in part, by the Property Owner to the purchaser of any parcel of land within the Property provided, however, such assignment shall not be effective unless and until EMWD and Authority have been notified, in writing, of such assignment. 11. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the matters prov~.ed for herein and supersedes all prior agreements and negotiations between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. 12. Notices. Any notice, payment or instrument required or permitted by this Agreement to be given or delivered to either party shall be deemed to have been received when personally delivered or seventy-two hours following deposit of the same in any United States Post Office in California, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: Authority I CFD: Temecula Public Financing Authority 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: Director of Public Works with a copy to: Temecula Public Financing Authority 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, California 92590 Attention: Treasurer EMWD: Eastern Municipal Water District P.O. Box 8300 2270 Trumble Road -11- Perris. California 92572-8300 Attn: General Manager Property Owner: Ashby USA, LLC 470 E, Harrison Street Corona, CA 92879-1314 Each party may change its address for delivery of notice by delivering written notice of such change of address to the other party hereto. 13, Exhibits. All exhibits attached hereto are incorporated into this Agreement by reference, 14, Attorneys' Fees. In the event of the bringing of any action or suit by any Party against any other Party arising out of this Agreement, the Party in whose favor final judgment shall be entered shall be entitled to recover from the losing Party all costs and expenses of suit, including reasonable attorneys' fees. 15, Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. 16. Governing Law. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California applicable to contracts made and performed in such State, 17. Waiver. Failure by a party...torinsist upon the strict performance of a!!y. of the provisions of this Agreement by the other party hereto, or the failure by a party to exercise its rights upon the default of another party, shall not constitute a waiver of such party's right to insist and demand strict compliance by such other party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 18. No Third Party Beneficiaries. No person or entity other than the CFD, when and if formed, shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary hereof, and nothing in this Agreement (either express or implied) is intended to confer upon any person or entity, other than EMWD, Authority, CFD, and Property Owner (and their respective successors and assigns, exclusive of individual homebuyers), any rights, remedies, obligations or liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement. 19. SinlPllar and Plural; Gender. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural, and terms in the masculine gender shall include the feminine. 20. Counterparts, This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which shall constitute but one instrument. -12- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written above, TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Executive Director EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT By: Anthony J. Pack, General Manager ATTEST: By: Secretary of the Board of Directors ASHBY USA, LLC By: Ashby Development Company, Inc., a California corporation, Managing Member By: Justin K. Ashby, Vice President By: USA Investment Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Member By: Joseph D. Milanowski, President -13- EXHIBIT A DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Numbers: 957-340-001, 957-340- 003, 957-340-007, 957-340-008, 957-130-001, 957-130-002, 957-260-001 and 957-260-002 A-I [~2?~~ ~ & ri ~ q ::I ~ .... ~. Cl.. (,I; Vl Q "Os:~~?; ~ ~ '::"'l ",- ('j ~ Cl 0 3 U'l =-s.;;{; g- o..:::I(,I;@ 3'~ ~~ r. '" - :1:3.g"g ~. ~ (j & ::I VI 0 (:l Vl (') C ..... o ::!.::; 0 ......., "S!. -< ::::. g o' 0 n """", :T (') o c " -< '" " " o a. " ~ o "'" '" ;:" " ~ ~ 0: " (') o c " -< ." " " Z ? ~ r m :;e C1 ~ m 0 Z . " < 0 > < 5 ;I ~ n ." 5 " > '" > 0 ~ " c. ;; . .~ -< " <'> Zi -l'" ('j ~ 3 @ g g ;.~ -00 C "'" 0'& ;::-:('J " tD :!!g " ~ ~ 0.. " 0 :.;-......., <r. 0 >::;" c g - - :TO ~ ;;! q' 5' 1::7 ~ ttl ~ W .....:n' ~ 0 0- ::r:;~o.s:::..;:tl ;; (;' ~ I'" ~ g o inS - 0 c _. (1) So a. g ;: g (11 \'11 '< ::r ~ ::r 0- o(?:::~ oS- "'" 0 0. 'i::I c:: .... ;:0 (1 ~ .., I;,f) ....::tl 0 ~ ~I ri g a rn I ~ 0 3 -, "'" C 0.. Cl....... i:I ;l P ::r~. 0 '<: rn/1l,-<: (fa aQ~ g"""" (1) c:: (') 0 :0::- ~~ S:""""I (') o':S: ~ ;:tl Vl ~ . ;;g ~? o 0 0 ~ .., a.. .......,_. S!. 0 ::l ~ ~ BOUNDARY MAP ;:o::r::1&;;:cl-i\j&t:3 ~ !!.:::I 0 ~. ~ Vi' ('j - o Cl.. Co) 0:; r.. ::l ""''''0 - - 0:::1 ""l ('j :1...... ::r c:: ::l n 0 I;,f) n nOn ::::. S' ~ ~ C ..... "0 .... g g-<r.: Cl..~O S)~~ g. Z )>0 lZl""O. r.,-<: I c.....,.....coo..n :" 1:!.t:l~2:wcrn ... _. (';) _. I 0 ;:::I. o @ 0 (') 0 c -. Cl..:!. n ......., '"T'j N:::-< ~ --< 0" n 5'- fr..... to:'" Q) Q);:;O...,::r o ..... cr. :=:::l Q (ii' e ......., Cll 0 '::"'l n _. <:r. ..... .., HJ 0 5'"'0 0 ::r ~ ~ 2.(JCl ~ ......., (1) !::.. 3 P >~ (J~. :;g<~;Ng~ 3Sf;;o~a::l n Q) Q) ;:I. (') E 3 ~ !l "'C''t:i -< :r... Q) N:i' c "0 y '-" ::;:"0 Of];Za()s.,'<~ ~ ;. fi' ri g ~ 0 ~ 0 0.. ::l (")::::: cr .., v-< -'-. '<8 '< ;:;':::1 ~.~......., 2.. a'~ . ~ '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ? g ~ ~ g b ~ ~ 0\ ;5:~;:;~oo~:::~ ;l o/'cr~1'"-l~~-< "'1ll0000~N=rI.,HIllN g5.;;cg~g~~g lr.l ,'tr.l' 0.: ' _~ ::r gg::r2::r~2b ~ W_~_~O\=Ul 0/' cr ~ a 00 N \".> "" '" .. . o 0 0 ., b b b ':,..,.. N ~ ~ - ~ A-2 -l'" n n - " ~ ~ ~ " n S 5-~ ..,0 - "'" &So =:n " ell "'0 5. Pl = a.. n 0 5' '-+j (10 0 > ~r :=-s:. :TO o ~ ;:!. Ul -< >s..-::: ~O- o :::;,!'! :J. g [ ~S - ~ " ::TCJ: :;; 0 & I ~~ ~ " ~ " a." .~ E. ~ ~ '" - O-o:T ""'c" :T'" ::n ('; ('; '":"l~ :' S e1~ n 0 =' ....., 60 ... " tD o '" a. '" o o ,. '" :r: '" '" -l o ." (")--l om s;::S;:: s;::~ ~e-o _t""::v fJJ --l;J> --l::V~><-o~ 2:i <0 "'r:151 0 tT1~~;:::t""gj or.;;~Fnv 'TJ6C-'TjtlJ ~tT18gz@ t""(").......fJJ;J>z ::;:jo~vzv o~zwg;J> ::Vz --l (") --l L. ~ _><::r::~am ;J> ~ (") ;J> CIl --leo z--l"'r:1 95 8~ '--l 13>< EXHIBIT B ACQUISITION FACILITIES DESCRIPTIONS Acquisition Facilities, The Acquisition Facilities eligible to be financed by the CFD under the Act are as follows: The type of Acquisition Facilities eligible to be financed by the CFD under the Act are as follows: "Acquisition Facilities" means those facilities constructed by or on behalf of the Property Owner which are needed by EMWD in order to provide services to the Property. The Acquisition Facilities listed below are anticipated to be financed by the CFD, Detailed scope and limits of specific projects will be determined as appropriate, consistent with the standards of EMWD, 1. Sanitary sewer system improvements within: . Butterfield Stage Road, from Nicolas Road to Calle Chapos/South Loop Road; Nicolas Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to Joseph Road; North Loop Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to the Gate House East of Butterfield Stage Road (public section only); South Loop Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to the Gate House East of Butterfield Stage Road (public section only); Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street), from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road; and Fiesta Ranch Road (B Street), from Roripaugh Valley Road to Nicolas Road. . . . . . 2, Water system improvements within: . Murrieta Hot Springs Road, from the West boundary of Tract 29661 to Butterfield Stage Road; Butterfield Stage Road, from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Calle Chapos/South Loop Road; Nicolas Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to Fiesta Ranch Road (B Street); North Loop Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to the Gate House East of Butterfield Stage Road (public section only); South Loop Road, from Butterfield Stage Road to the Gate House East of Fiesta Ranch Road (public section only); . . . . . Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street), from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road; and . Fiesta Ranch Road (B Street), from Roripaugh Valley Road to Nicolas Road. :.:t""'" ;...""- NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code, the undersigned Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the" Authority"), County of Riverside, State of California, hereby gives notice that a lien to secure payment of a special tax which the Board of Directors of the Authority authorized, is hereby imposed. The special tax secured by this lien is authorized to be levied for the purpose of paying principal and interest on bonds, the proceeds of which are being used to finance the costs of certain public improvements and of the elimination of a fixed special assessment lien, all as described on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. The special tax is authorized to be levied within the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) which has now been officially formed and the lien of the special tax is a continuing lien which shall secure each annual levy of the special tax and which shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is permanently satisfied and cancelled in accordance with law or until the special tax ceases to be levied and a notice of cessation of special tax is recorded in accordance with Section 53330.5 of the Government Code. The rate, method of apportionment, and manner of collection of the authorized special tax is as set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Conditions under which the obligation to pay the special tax may be prepaid in part or in whole and permanently satisfied in part or in whole are as provided in Exhibit B hereto. Notice is further given that upon the recording of this notice in the office of the County Recorder, the obligation to pay the special tax levy shall become a lien upon all nonexempt real property within the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03- 02 (Roripaugh Ranch) in accordance with Section 3115.5 of the California Streets and Highways Code. The name(s) of the owner(s) of the real property included within the area of this community facilities district and the assessor's tax parcel(s) numbers of all parcels or any portion thereof which are included within the area of this community facilities district, in each case which are not exempt from the special tax and as they appear on the latest secured assessment roll as of the date of recording of this or as otherwise known to the Authority, are as set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof. Reference is made to the boundary map of the community facilities district recorded on August 31, 2004 at Book 58 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 51 (instrument no. 2004-0691181), in the office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, State of California, which map is now the final boundary map of the community facilities district. -2- For further information concerning the current and estimated future tax liability of owners or purchasers of real property subject to this special tax lien, interested persons should contact the Treasurer of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, Temecula Public Financing Authority, 43200 Business Park Drive, Temecula, CA 92590, telephone number (909) 694-6430. Dated: .2005 By: Susan W, Jones, Secretary Temecula Public Financing Authority -3- EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES ELIGIBLE TO BE FUNDED BY THE DISTRICT AND PRIOR LIEN TO BE ELIMINATED BY THE DISTRICT FACILITIES The District may finance all or part of the costs of the following: 1. Murrieta Hot Springs Road Murrieta Hot Springs Road (MHSR) from the Westerly Boundary Line of Tract 29661 (existing end of pavement) to Butterfield Stage Road: Improvements include grading for full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, traffic signal(s) landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete MHSR. 2. Butterfield Stage Road Butterfield Stage Road (BSR) from the Northerly tract boundary to Rancho California Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal(s), signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, concrete slope protection, bridges over Santa Gertrudis Creek, and Long Valley Channel, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Butterfield Stage Road, 3. Nicolas Road 3a Nicolas Road BSR to the Easterly Metropolitan Water District (MWD) RJW: Improvements include grading right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, split rail fence, street lights, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, undergrOlmd sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. 3b Nicolas Road from the Easterly MWD RJW to Liefer Road including construction of Calle Garisol realignment to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading partial right-of-way (40' travel way) with 2:1 slopes, paving, asphalt berms, curb and gutter, sidewalk, asphalt path, utility relocations, traffic detour, split rail fence, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, sewer, A-I storm drain, bridge over Santa Gertrudis Creek (including channel lining and transition structure to bridge), access road, exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road. 3c Nicolas Road Sewer Pipeline from Liefer Road to Joseph Road: Improvements include installing a 15" main line sewer including street re-pavement, traffic detour and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Nicolas Road Sewer pipeline. 3d Nicolas Road and North General Kearny Road intersection signalization: Improvements include signalization of intersection, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the signalization. 3e Nicolas Road and Winchester Road intersection widening and signal modification: Improvements include modifications to existing traffic signal, storm drain, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, bus turn-out, striping, traffic control and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the intersection and signal modifications. 4. Calle Chapos Calle Chapos from BSR to Walcott Lane: Improvements include grading half right-of-way width plus twelve feet with 2:1 slopes, paving, AC dike, storm drain and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Calle Chapos. 5. Long Valley Channel Long Valley Channel from the Westerly RIW of BSR to the Easterly Project Boundary: Improvements include grading of channel, flow-by detention basin, construction of drop structures, trapezoidal channel lining, transition structures to Butterfield Stage Road Bridge, rip-rap, grading and paving of access roads, fencing, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Long Valley Channel. 6. Santa Gertrudis Creek Santa Gertrudis Creek from the Habitat Area to the exit channel at MWD R1W: Improvements include a flow-by detention basin, headwalls, trapezoidal channel lining and transition structures; grading, fencing and paving for access roads; desilting and detention basins, rip-rap protection, rip-rap dissipaters, benns, grading of exit structure and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Santa Gertrudis Creek. A-2 7. Environmental Mitigation Mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements: Creation of 8.2 acres of habitat within open space to include grading, access road, electrical service, irrigation, plant and seed installation and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete resource agency conditioned environmental mitigation for the Long Valley Channel and Santa Gertrudis Creek improvements. 8. Sports Park Sports Park at the SE corner of the intersection of North Loop Road and Butterfield Stage Road: Construct 20o!:-acre Sports Park including grading, parking, building, lighting landscaping, irrigation, playing fields, basketball courts, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Sports Park. 9. Fire Station Site Grading Roripaugh Ranch Fire Station site grading Improvements include site grading and other appurtenant improvements necessary to provide a rough graded fire station site. 10. North Loop Road North Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (Public Section only): Improvements include grading full right-oi-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, North Loop Road Bridge and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the North Loop Road East oi BSR. 11. South Loop Road South Loop Road from BSR to Gate House East of BSR (Public Section only): Improvements include grading full right-ai-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the public segment of the South Loop Road East of BSR. A-3 12. Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street) Roripaugh Valley Road Grading and Street Improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Roripaugh Valley Road between Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road. 13. Fiesta Ranch Road ( B Street) Fiesta Ranch Road Grading and Street Improvements from Roripaugh Valley Road to Nicolas Road: Improvements include grading full right-of-way with 2:1 slopes, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation, storm drain, sewer and water pipelines, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete Fiesta Ranch Road between Roripaugh Valley Road and Nicolas Road. 14. Fire Station and Fire Apparatus Fire Station Construction and Fire Truck Purchase: Improvements include the acquisition of land for and construction of a fire station to be located at the Southeast comer of Butterfield Stage Road and the South Loop Road, and to consist of a building of approximately 9,100 square feet. Also, the equipping of the fire station, including furniture and fixtures, and the acquisition of a fire truck and other fire fighting apparatus. 15. Neighborhood Park Neighborhood Park at the SW corner of the intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Roripaugh Valley Road (A Street): Construct 5.1-acre Neighborhood Park including grading, parking, restroom building, lighting, landscaping, irrigation, open grass area, basketball court, children's play area, equipment with a useful life of five (5) years or more and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete the Neighborhood Park. 16. SR-79 Improvements Improvements include right-of-way acquisition, grading to accommodate road widening, paving, curb and gutter, median curb, sidewalk, street lights, traffic signal(s), signing and striping, landscaping, irrigation. storm drain, and other appurtenant improvements necessary to complete improvements to SR-79 within the City of Temecula City limits. A-4 PRIOR LIEN The District may fund amounts necessary to eliminate all or a portion of the lien imposed by the County of Riverside Assessment District No. 161 on the real property within the District. OTHER The District may also finance any of the following: 1. Bond related expenses, including underwriter's discount, reserve fund, capitalized interest. bond and disclosure counsel and all other incidental expenses. 2. Administrative fees of the Authority, the City of Temecula and the bond trustee or fiscal agent related to the District and any bonded indebtedness of the District. 3. Reimbursement of costs related to the formation of the District advanced by the Authority, the City or any related entity, or any landowner or developer within the District, as well as reimbursement of any costs advanced by the Authority or any related entity, or any landowner or developer within the District, for facilities, fees or other purposes or costs of the Dis trict A-5 EXHIBIT B TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) RATE AND METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF SPECIAL TAX TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY A Special Tax shall be levied and collected on all Taxable Property located within the boundaries of CFD No, 03-02 Temecula Public Financing Authority Conununity Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) ("CFD No. 03-02"), The amount of Special Tax to be levied in each Fiscal Year on a Parcel in CFD No. 03-02, conunencing with Fiscal Year 2005- 2006, shall be determined by the CFD Administrator through the application of the procedures described below. All of the real property in CFD No. 03-02, unless exempted by law or the provisions herein, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIONS In addition to the capitalized terms set forth in the preceding paragraph, capitalized terms used in this Section A shall have the following meanings: "Acre" means 43,560 square feet of land. The Acres for a Parcel means the land area of the Parcel as shown on or determined from the applicable Assessor's Parcel Map. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Acres attributable to each Parcel of Residential Property that is (i) located in 'a Final Map and (ii) an individual single-family home lot or Condominium shall be computed by the CFD Administrator by dividing the sum of the land area for all such Parcels of Residential Property in the Final Map by the number of such Parcels. The Acres for any leasehold or possessory interest shall be the Acres for the Parcel which corresponds to such leasehold or possessory interest. "Acreage Special Tax" means the special tax set forth in Section C.2 below. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Conununity Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the actual or reasonably estimated costs directly related to the administration of CFD No. 03-02, including but not limited to the following: (i) the costs of computing the Special Taxes and of preparing the annual Special Tax collection schedules (whether by the CFD Administrator or designee thereof, or both); (ii) the costs of collecting the Special Taxes (whether by the Authority, County, City, or otherwise); (iii) the costs of remitting the Special Taxes to the fiscal agent or trustee for any Bonds; (iv) the costs of conunencing and pursuing to completion any foreclosure action arising from delinquent Special Taxes; (v) the costs of the fiscal agent or trustee (including its legal counsel) in the discharge of the duties required of it under any Indenture; (vi) the costs of the Authority, City, or designee of complying with B-1 arbitrage rebate and disclosure requirements of applicable federal and State of California securities laws, the Act, and the California Government Code, including property owner or Bond owner inquiries regarding the Special Taxes; (vii) the costs associated with the release of funds from any escrow account; (viii) the costs of the Authority, City, or designee related to any appeal of a Special Tax; and (ix) an allocable share of the salaries of the City staff and City overhead expense directly relating to the foregoing. Administrative Expenses shall also include amounts advanced by the City or the Authority for any administrative purposes of CFD No. 03-02. "Assessor" means the County Assessor of the County of Riverside. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor designating parcels of land or Condominium units by number. "Authority" means the Temecula Public Financing Authority. "Board of Directors" means Board of Directors of the Authority, acting as the legislative body of CFD No. 03-02. "Bonds" means any bonds or other indebtedness (as defined in the Act), whether in one or more series, the repayment of which is secured by the levy of Special Taxes on Parcels within CFD No, 03-02. "CFD Administrator" means the Finance Director of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the Special Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of Special Taxes. "City" means the City of Temecula, California. "Condominium" means a residential dwelling unit meeting the statutory definition of a condominium contained in the California Civil Code, Section 1351, and for which a condominium plan has been recorded pursuant to California Civil Code, Section 1352. "County" means the County of Riverside, California. "Developed Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property, for which a Final Map was recorded as of the January 1 and a building permit for new construction was issued as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property. "Dwelling Unit Special Tax" means the special tax set forth in Section C.l below. "Exempt Property" means any Parcel located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 which is exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Final Map" means a subdivision of property by recordation of a (i) final map or parcel map approved by the City pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California B-2 Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), (ii) lot line adjustment approved by the City, or (iii) condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting on each July 1 and ending on the following June 30. "Indenture" means the indenture, fiscal agent agreement, trust agreement, resolution or other instrument pursuant to which Bonds are issued, as modified, amended and! or supplemented from time to time, and any instrument replacing or supplementing the same. "Land Use" means the land use set forth in the Land Use Plan. "Land Use Plan" means the approved land use plan for the Specific Plan. "Lot" means (i) any lot within a Final Map that is located at least partially within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 or (ii) any land within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 that is conveyed, dedicated, or otherwise acquired by or irrevocably offered to the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other governmental agency. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum special tax, determined in accordance with Section C, that can be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Parcel. "Non-Residential Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property which are not classified as Residential Property, Property Owner's Association Property, or Public Property . "Parcel" means a parcel (i) which is located at least partially within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and (ii) to which an Assessor's parcel number is assigned as shown on an Assessor's Parcel Map. "Planning Area" means those planning areas designated by number on the Land Use Plan. "Property Owner's Association Property" means (i) any Parcel for which the owner of record, as determined from the County Assessor's secured tax roll for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, is a property owner's association, including any master or sub-association, (ii) any Lot located in a Final Map that was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and which, as determined from such Final Map, is or will be open space, a private park or recreation facility, or a private street owned by a property owner's association, (iii) any Lot within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No, 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and any Parcel for which the Land Use is private mini park or private recreation center, or (iv) any Lot or Parcel which, as of the April 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, has been conveyed, irrevocably dedicated, or irrevocably offered to a property owner's association, including any master or sub- B-3 association, provided such conveyance, dedication, or offer is submitted to the CFD Administrator prior to the May 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied. "Proportionately" means that with respect to a given classification of property the ratio of the Special Tax to the Dwelling Unit Special Tax or Acreage Special Tax, as applicable, is the same for all Parcels assigned to such classification. For example, levying the Special Tax Proportionately on Parcels of Developed Residential Property means that for all such Parcels the ratio of the Special Tax to the Dwelling Unit Special Tax is the same. "Public Property" means (i) any Parcel for which the owner of record, as determined from the County Assessor's secured tax roll for the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied, is the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other governmental agency, (ii) any property within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and which, as determined from such Final Map, is or will be a public street, (iii) any Lot within a Final Map that is located within the boundaries of CFD No. 03-02 and was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied and any Parcel for which the Land Use is neighborhood park, sports park, educational, public institutional, habitat, flood control, or landscape slope, unless such Lot or Parcel has an underlying residential land use and the applicable public entity has provided notice to the City that it will not acquire or otherwise take ownership of the Parcel, or (iv) any Lot or Parcel which, as of the Aprill preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, has been conveyed, irrevocably dedicated to, or irrevocably offered to the federal government, the State of California, the County, the City, or any local government or other governmental agency, provided such conveyance, dedication, or offer is submitted to the CFD Administrator prior to the May 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied. "Residential Floor Area" means all of the square footage within the perimeter of a residential structure, not including any carport, walkway, garage, overhang, patio, enclosed patio, or similar area as determined from the applicable building permit(s) issued for such structure as of the Aprill preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. Such determination shall be final following the final inspection or certification of occupancy for the dwelling unit(s), "Residential Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property, designated with a residential Land Use. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax levied in each Fiscal Year on each Parcel. "Special Tax Requirement" means (a) that amount with respect to CFD No. 03-02 required in any Fiscal Year to pay (i) for annual debt service on all outstanding Bonds due in the calendar year which commences in such Fiscal Year; (ii) periodic costs on the Bonds, including, but not limited to, the costs of remarketing, credit enhancement, and B-4 liquidity facility fees (including such fees for instruments that serve as the basis of a reserve fund in lieu of cash related to any such Bonds) and rebate payments; (iii) the Administrative Expenses; (iv) any reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year or otherwise reasonably expected; (v) any amounts required to establish or replenish any reserve funds established for the Bonds, and less (b) available funds as directed under the Indenture. "Specific Plan" means the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (City of Temecula Resolution 02-112, Ordinance 02-13), as amended. "Taxable Property" means all Parcels which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Taxable Property Owner's Association Property" means all Parcels of Property Owner's Association Property which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Taxable Public Property" means all Parcels of Public Property which are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or Section E below. "Undeveloped Property" means all Parcels of Taxable Property which are not classified as Developed Property, exclusive of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property. B. ASSIGNMENT TO LAND USE CATEGORY Each Fiscal Year, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006, all Parcels shall be classified as either Taxable Property or Exempt Property. Taxable Property shall be further classified as Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, Taxable Property Owner's Association Property, or Taxable Public Property, Residential Property and Non- Residential Property shall be further classified as Developed Property and Undeveloped Property (hereinafter referred to as "Developed Residential Property," "Developed Non-Residential Property," "Undeveloped Residential Property," or "Undeveloped Non-Residential Property"). For purposes of determining the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax, Developed Residential Property shall be assigned to classifications one through fifteen in Table 1 below based on Residential Floor Area. If a Parcel consists of two or more Lots located in a Final Map that was recorded as of the January 1 preceding the Fiscal Year for which the Special Tax is being levied, each such Lot shall be treated as a Parcel and classified independently of the other; however, the aggregate Special Tax for the Lots will be levied on the Parcel. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Developed Residential Property shall be the greater of the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax or Acreage Special Tax. If there B-5 are two or more residential dwelling units located on a Parcel, the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax for such Parcel shall be the sum of the Dwelling Unit Special Tax for each such residential dwelling unit. The Maximum Special Tax for each Parcel of Undeveloped Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, Taxable Property Owner's Association Property, and Taxable Public Property shall be the applicable Acreage Special Tax. 1. Dwelling Unit Special Tax The Dwelling Unit Special Tax rates are shown in Table 1 below. TABLE 1 DWELLING UNIT SPECIAL TAX RATES FOR DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DWELLING RESIDENTIAL UNIT SPECIAL TAX FLOOR SPECIAL CLASSIFICATION AREA TAX 1 Residential >5,000 $4.230' 2 Residential >4,400 and <=5.000 $3,995' 3 Residential >4,200 and <=4,400 $3,520' 4 Residential >4,000 and <=4,200 $3,356' 5 Residential >3,800 and <=4,000 $3,192' 6 Residential >3,600 and <=3.800 $3,028' 7 Residential >3,400 and <=3,600 $2,865' 8 Residential >3,200 and <=3,400 $2,701 ' 9 Residential >3,000 and <=3,200 $2,537' 10 Residential >2,800 and <=3,000 $2,374' 11 Residential >2,600 and <=2,800 $2,210' 12 Residential >2,400 and <=2.600 $2,046' 13 Residential >2,200 and <=2,400 $1,883' 14 Residential >2,000 and <=2,200 $1,719' 15 Residential <=2,000 $1,586' 'Per residential dwelling unit B-6 2, Acreage Special Tax The Acreage Special Tax rates are shown in Table 2 below. TABLE 2 ACREAGE SPECIAL TAX RATES PROPERTY CLASSIFICA nON/LAND USE ACREAGE SPECIAL TAX Developed and Undeveloped Residential Property Low Density (L) or Low-Estate Density (L-E) $5,620 Per Acre Low Medium Density (LM) $17,665 Per Acre Medium Density Standard (Ml) $17,665 Per Acre Medium Density Clustered (M2) $17.665 Per Acre Developed and Undeveloped Non-Residential Property (NC) $8,247 Per Acre Taxable Property Owner's Association Property $17.665 Per Acre Taxable Public Property $17,665 Per Acre Notwithstanding the above, if the Land Use Plan is amended or the zoning of the Planning Areas is otherwise amended resulting in a Land Use which is not shown in Table 2 above, then the Acreage Special Tax rate applicable to each Parcel to which the new Land Use applies shall be $17,665, In addition, if at any time subsequent to the issuance of Bonds the Land Use Plan is amended or the zoning or configuration of the Planning Areas is otherwise amended, the CFD Administrator shall determine if the Acreage Special Taxes that may thereafter be levied are less than the sum of estimated Administrative Expenses and one hundred ten percent (110%) of the maximum annual debt service for outstanding Bonds. If the amended Land Use Plan, zoning, and/ or Planning Area configuration has resulted in such a reduction, then the Acreage Special Tax for each Parcel to which such amendments apply shall be computed using the Acreage Special Tax rate(s) previously applicable to such Parcel. If the previous Land Use for any portion of a Parcel to which the amended Land Use Plan, zoning, and/or Planning Area configuration applies was not low density (L), low-estate density (L-E), low medium density (LM), medium density standard (Ml), medium density clustered (M2), or neighborhood commercial (NC) then the applicable Acreage Special Tax rate shall be $17,665. D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006 and for each following Fiscal Year, the CFD Administrator shall levy the Special Tax on all Taxable Property to fund the Special Tax Requirement as follows: First: The Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Developed Property, up to 100% of 'the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax in the case of Developed Residential Property and up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax in the case of Developed Non:Residential Property; Second: If additional Special Taxes are needed after the first step, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Undeveloped Property, up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax; B-7 Third: If additional Special Taxes an; needed after the second step, the Special Tax for Parcels of Developed Property for which the Maximum Special Tax is derived from the applicable Acreage Special Tax shall be increased equally, measured on a percentage basis, from the amounts levied under the preceding Step 1 up to 100% of the applicable Acreage Special Tax (i.e., the percentage increase shall be equal for all applicable Parcels. until the Maximum Special Tax is reached); and Fourth: If additional Special Taxes are needed after the third step, the Special Tax shall be levied Proportionately on each Parcel of Taxable Property Owner's Association Property and Taxable Public Property up to the applicable Maximum Special Tax. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Taxes levied against any Parcel used as a private residence be increased as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Parcel or Parcels within CFD No. 03- 02 by more than ten percent (10%) per Fiscal Year. In addition, under no circumstances will the Acreage Special Tax be levied against Parcels of Developed Residential Property if the Special Taxes which may be levied pursuant to the first and second steps above are equal to or greater than sum of estimated Administrative Expenses and one hundred ten percent (110%) of the then maximum annual debt service for outstanding Bonds. E. EXEMPTIONS . The Board of Directors shall not levy a Special Tax on up to 511.11 Acres of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property. If the total number of Acres of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property exceeds 511.11, the chronological order in which such property is classified will determine which Parcels are classified as Exempt Property and which are classified as Taxable Property. If a Lot or Parcel is no longer classified as Property Owner's Association Property or Public Property, its status as Exempt Property will be revoked. The following property shall be classified as Property Owner's Association Property or Public Property, as applicable, at the time CFD No. 03-02 is established and shall count toward the limitation of 511.11 Acres of Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property set forth in the preceding paragraph: . Property Owner's Association Property and Public Property: Lots A and B (portion of Murrieta Hot Springs Road), Lot 2 (private mini park), Lot 5 (private recreation center), and Lot 8 (open space) of Tract 29353-1; Lots Hand 5 (open space), Lots A through G and M through 0 (streets), Lots I, J, and K (flood control), Lot L (equestrian trail), Lots 2 and 9 (parks), Lots 10 and 11 (school sites), and Lot 12 (fire station) of Tract 29353-2; and the property described in and conveyed to the City pursuant to a grant deed dated May 21, 2003 and recorded with the County as Document Number 2003-371374. Subject to Section 53317.5 of the Act, if a Lot or Parcel classified as Developed Residential Property is acquired by a public entity by any means, including by negotiated transaction, gift, devise, or foreclosure, such Lot or Parcel will notwithstanding anything else herein be subject to the Special Tax in accordance with B-8 the terms for Developed Residential Property. In addition, if a Parcel of Public Property is leased to a non-governmental entity, then the leasehold or possessory interest, in accordance with Section 53340.1 of the Act, shall be subject to the applicable Acreage Special Tax. F. MANNER OF COLLECTION The Special Tax shall be collected in the same manner and at the same time as ordinary ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, the same procedure, sale and lien priority in the case of delinquency; provided, however, that the Special Tax may be billed directly and/ or may be collected at a different time or in a different manner if necessary or convenient to meet the financial obligations of CFD No. 03-02, or as otherwise determined by the CFD Administrator, The foreclosure remedies provided for in the Indenture shall apply upon the nonpayment of the Special Tax. G. REVIEW AND APPEALS Any taxpayer may file a written appeal of the Special Tax levied on his/her property with the CFD Administrator, provided that the appellant is current in his/her payments of Special Taxes. During the pendency of an appeal, all Special Taxes previously levied must be paid on or before the payment date established when the levy was made. The appeal must specify the reasons why the appellant claims the Special Tax is in error. The CFD Administrator shall review the appeal, meet with the appellant if the CFD Administrator deems necessary, and advise the appellant of its determination. If the CFD Administrator agrees with the appellant, the CFD Administrator shall grant a credit to eliminate or reduce future Special Taxes on the appellant's property. No refunds of previously paid Special Taxes shall be made. H. PREPAYMENT OF SPECIAL TAX 1. Full Prepayment- Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, and Taxable Property Owner's Association Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Parcel of Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property may be prepaid and permanently satisfied as described herein, provided that a prepayment may be made only if at the time of the prepayment there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Parcel and all other Parcels which are under the same ownership and located within CFD No. 03-02. An owner of a Parcel intending to prepay the Maximum Special Tax shall provide the CFD Administrator with written notice of intent to prepay, and within 10 business days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the non-refundable deposit determined to cover the cost to be incurred by the CFD No. 03-02 in calculating the prepayment amount. Within 10 business days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the prepayment amount. Prepayment must be made not less than 60 days prior to any redemption date, unless otherwise authorized by B-9 the CFD Administrator, for any Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment proceeds, The "Full Prepayment Amonnt" means an amonnt equal to the sum of (1) Bond Redemption Amonnt, (2) Redemption Premium, (3) Defeasance Amonnt, and (4) Fees, less the Reserve Fnnd Credit, where the terms "Bond Redemption Amount," "Redemption Premium," "Defeasance Amount," IIFees," and "Reserve Fnnd Credit" have the following meanings: "Bond Redemption Amonnt" means the principal amonnt of Bonds to be redeemed and equals the greater of (a) the quotient derived by dividing (i) the applicable Dwelling Unit Special Tax, in the case of Residential Property, or Acreage Special Tax, in the case of Non-Residential Property or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property by (ii) the sum of the aggregate Dwelling Unit Special Taxes (for Residential Property) and Acreage Special Taxes (for Non-Residential Property) for CFD No, 03-02 (and excluding from (ii) any Special Taxes which have been prepaid) or (b) the quotient derived by dividing (iii) the applicable Acreage Special Tax by (iv) the sum of the aggregate Acreage Special Taxes (for Residential Property and Non-Residential Property) for CFD No. 03-02 (and excluding from (iv) any Special Taxes which have been prepaid) in each case multiplied by the principal amonnt of outstanding Bonds ronnded up to the nearest $5,000. The aggregate special taxes nnder (a) and (b) above means the aggregate special taxes upon completion of the development of CFD No. 03-02. Prior to the completion of the development of CFD No, 03-02, the aggregate special taxes nnder (a) and (b) above shall be as projected by the CFD Administrator. "Redemption Premium" means the Bond Redemption Amonnt multiplied by the applicable redemption premium, if any, for the Bonds to be redeemed. "Defeasance Amonnt" means the amonnt needed to pay interest on the Bond Redemption Amonnt nntil the earliest redemption date for the outstanding Bonds. Credit shall be given for any portion of the Special Tax heretofore paid by the Parcel for which the Full Prepayment Amonnt is being calculated and which will be, but has not yet been, utilized to pay interest and principal on the Bonds. "Fees" equal the fees and expenses of CFD No, 03-02 related to the Full Prepayment Amonnt, including, but not limited to, the costs of computing the Full Prepayment Amonnt, the costs of redeeming Bonds, and the costs of recording any notices to evidence that the Maximum Special Tax has been prepaid. "Reserve Fnnd Credit" shall equal the lesser of (i) the reduction in the applicable "Reserve Requirement," as such term is defined in the Indenture, if any, following the redemption of Bonds from proceeds of B-lO the Prepayment Amount or (ii) the amount derived by subtracting the new Reserve Requirement in effect after the redemption of Bonds from proceeds of the Full Prepayment Amount from the balance in the "Reserve Fund," as such term is defined in the Indenhtre, on the prepayment date, but in no event shall such amount be less than zero. The CFD Administrator shall remove any portion of the Special Tax which has been enrolled but not paid. With respect to any Parcel that has prepaid the Maximum Special Tax, the Board of Directors shall cause a suitable notice to be recorded in compliance with the Act, to indicate the prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax and the release of the Special Tax lien on such Parcel, and the obligation of such Parcel to pay the Special Tax shall cease. 2. Partial Prepayment - Developed Property, Non-Residential Property, and Taxable Property Owner's Association Property The Maximum Special Tax for any Parcel of Developed Residential Property, Non-Residential Property, or Taxable Property Owner's Association Property may be prepaid in part as described herein, provided that (i) the Bond Redemption Amount must be an integral multiple of $5,000 and (ii) at the time of the prepayment there are no delinquent Special Taxes with respect to such Parcel and all other Parcels which are under the same ownership and located within CFD No. 03-02, The "Partial Prepayment Amount" shall be computed using the methodology in Section H.l and substihtting the portion of the Maximum Special Tax to be prepaid by the Parcel for its Dwelling Unit Special Tax and Acreage Special Tax when determining the Bond Redemption Amount. The owner intending to prepay a portion of the Maximum Special Tax shall notify the CFD Administrator in writing of (i) such owner's intent to partially prepay the Maximum Special Tax, (ii) the percentage by which the Maximum Special Tax shall be prepaid, and (iii) the company or agency that will be acting as the escrow agent, if applicable, and within 10 business days of receipt of such written notice, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the non- refundable deposit determined to cover the cost to be incurred by CFD No. 03-02 in calculating the amount of the partial prepayment. Within 10 business days of receipt of such non-refundable deposit, the CFD Administrator shall notify such owner of the Partial Prepayment Amount. Prepayment must be made not less than 60 days prior to any redemption date, unless authorized by the CFD Administrator, for any Bonds to be redeemed with the prepayment proceeds. With respect to any Parcel that has prepaid a portion of the Maximum Special Tax, the CFD Administrator shall indicate in the records of CFD No. 03-02 that there has been a partial prepayment of the Maximum Special Tax, the amount of the Maximum Special Tax which has been prepaid, and the amount of the Maximum Special Tax which continue to be levied on such Parcel.n The Bond Redemption Amount, Redemption Premium, Defeasance Amount, and Reserve Fund Credit shall be used to pay interest on and redeem Bonds in B-ll accordance with the Indenture. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no prepayment shall be allowed unless the amount of Maximum Special Taxes that may be levied in CFD No. 03-02 after the proposed prepayment is at least the sum of (i) the estimated Administrative Expenses and (ii) one hundred ten percent (110%) of the annual debt service on the Bonds, taking into account the amount of Bonds to remain outstanding after such prepayment. 1. TERM The Maximum Special Tax shall be levied for a period not to exceed 50 Fiscal Years, commencing with Fiscal Year 2005-2006. B-12 EXHIBIT C TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS AND OWNERS OF LAND WITHIN THE DISTRICT County Assessor's Parcel Numbers Owner of Record of Parcels C-l RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DETERMINING THE NECESSITY TO INCUR BONDED INDEBTEDNESS WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) AND SUBMITTING PROPOSITION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein - Roripaugh Ranch 03-02" (the "Resolution of Intention") stating its intention to form the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "District"), pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, California Government Code Section 53311 et seq. (the "Law"), to fund a portion of the costs of certain public improvements (the "Facilities") and the cost to eliminate a fixed special assessment lien (the "Prior Lien"), secured by a special tax lien on parcels in the District, as described therein; and WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Incur Bonded Indebtedness of the Proposed Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)" (the "Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness") stating its intention to incur bonded indebtedness within the boundaries of the District for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities and the elimination of the Prior Lien; and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness called for public hearings on the District to be held on September 28, 2004; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2004, this Board of Directors adopted a Resolution amending the Resolution of Intention and the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness (the "Amending Resolution") to add additional facilities eligible to be funded by the District and to change the date of the public hearings from September 28, 2004 to November 9, 2004; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing to November 23, 2004, on November 23, 2004 this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and again continued the public hearing to December7,2004;and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and adopted a resolution making findings of complexity of the District, and then continued the public hearing to January 11, 2005; and WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held the public hearing as required by the Law and the Resolution of Intention relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District, the provision by the District of funds to pay a portion of the costs of the Facilities and the elimination of the Prior Lien, and the rate and method of apportionment of the special tax to be levied within the District to pay the principal and interest on the proposed indebtedness and the administrative costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula relative to the District; and WHEREAS, at the hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District, the provision of funds to pay a portion of the costs of the Facilities and of the elimination of the Prior Lien, and the levy of the special tax on property within the District, were heard and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the hearing, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Formation Of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), Authorizing The Levy Of A Special Tax Within The District, Preliminarily Establishing An Appropriations Limit For The District And Submitting Levy Of The Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit To The Qualified Electors Of The District" (the "Resolution of Formation"); and WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors held the continued public hearing as required by the Law relative to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness; and WHEREAS, no written protests with respect to the matters material to the questions set forth in the Resolution of Intention to Incur Indebtedness have been filed with the Secretary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct. Section 2. This Board of Directors deems it necessary to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $55,000,000 within the boundaries of the District. Section 3. The indebtedness is incurred for the purpose of financing the costs of the Facilities and the costs of eliminating the Prior Lien, as provided in the Resolution of Formation including, but not limited to, the costs of issuing and selling bonds to finance costs of the Facilities, the costs of eliminating the Prior Lien and the initial costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula in administering the District. Section 4. The whole of the District shall pay for the bonded indebtedness through the levy of the special tax. The special tax is to be apportioned in accordance with the Rate and Method set forth in Exhibit B to the Resolution of Intention. Section 5. The maximum amount of bonded indebtedness to be incurred is $55,000,000 and the maximum term of the bonds to be issued shall in no event exceed forty (40) years. Section 6. The bonds shall bear interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by applicable law at the time of sale of the bonds, payable weekly, semiannually or in such other manner as this Board of Directors or its designee shall determine, the actual rate or rates and times of payment of such interest to be determined by this Board of Directors or its designee at the time or times of sale of the bonds. -2- Section 7. The proposition of incurring the bonded indebtedness herein authorized shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District and shall be consolidated with elections on the proposition of levying special taxes within the District and the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District pursuant to Section 53353.5(a) of the Law. The time, place and conditions of said election shall be as specified by separate resolution of this Board of Directors. Section 8. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss . Q.LlY OF TEMEf~UJ:,6I,,,,,.. ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 05-_ was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 11 th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: NOES: ABSENT: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -3- RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALLING SPECIAL ELECTION WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the Districf' (the "Resolution of Formation"), ordering the formation of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "Districf'), authorizing the levy of a special tax on property within the District and preliminarily establishing an appropriations limit for the District; WHEREAS, on this date, this Board of Directors also adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District" (the "Resolution to Incur Indebtedness"), determining the necessity to incur bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $55,000,000 upon the security 01 the special tax to be levied within the District; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions 01 said resolutions, the propositions of the levy of said special tax, the establishment of the appropriations limit and the incurring of the bonded indebtedness is to be submitted to the qualified electors 01 the District as required by the Mello- Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, California Government Code Section 53311 et seq. (the "Law"). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. Pursuant to Sections 53325.7, 53326 and 53351 of the Law, the issues of the levy of said special tax, the incurring of bonded indebtedness and the establishment of said appropriations limit shall be submitted to the qualified electors of the District at an election called therefor as provided below. Section 2. As authorized by Section 53353.5 of the Law, the three propositions described in paragraph 1 above shall be combined into a single ballot measure, the form of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A and by this reference incorporated herein. The form of ballot is hereby approved. . Section 3. This Board of Directors hereby finds that fewer than 12 persons have been registered to vote within the territory of the District for each of the ninety (90) days preceding the close of the public hearings heretofore conducted and concluded by this Board of Directors for the purposes of these proceedings. Accordingly, and pursuant to Section 53326(b) of the Law, this Board of Directors finds that for purposes of these proceedings the qualified electors are the landowners within the District and that the vote shall be by said landowners or their authorized representatives, each having one vote for each acre or portion thereof such landowner owns in the District as of the close of the public hearings. Section 4. This Board of Directors hereby calls a special election to consider the measure described in Section 2 above, which election shall be held immediately following adoption of this Resolution in the meeting place of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority. The Secretary is hereby designated as the official to conduct said election. It is hereby acknowledged that the Secretary has on file the Resolution of Formation, a map of the proposed boundaries of the District, and a sufficient description to allow the Secretary to determine the boundaries of the District. The voted ballots shall be returned to the Secretary no later than immediately following the adoption of this Resolution; and when all of the qualified voters have voted, the election shall be closed. Section 5. Pursuant to Section 53327 of the Law, the election shall be conducted by mail or hand delivered ballot pursuant to the California Elections Code. This Board of Directors hereby finds that paragraphs (a), (b), (c) (1) and (c)(3) of Section 4000 of the California Elections Code are applicable to this special election. Section 6. This Board of Directors acknowledges that the Secretary has caused to be delivered to the qualified electors of the District ballots in the form set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Each ballot indicated the number of votes to be voted by the respective landowner. Each ballot was accompanied by all supplies and written instructions necessary for the use and return of the ballot. An envelope to be used to return the respective ballot was enclosed with the ballot, had the return postage prepaid, and contained the following: (a) the name and address of the applicable landowner, (b) a declaration, under penalty of perjury, stating that the voter is the owner of record or authorized representative of the landowner entitled to vote and is the person whose name appears on the envelope, (c) the printed name, signature and address of the voter, (d) the date of signing and place of execution of the declaration pursuant to clause (b) above, and (e) a notice that the envelope contains an official ballot and is to be opened only by the Secretary. Analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measures were waived by the landowners in their petitions to form the District as well as in their voted ballots, as permitted by Section 53327(b) of the Law. Section 7. The Secretary shall accept the ballots of the qualified electors upon and prior to the adoption of this Resolution, whether the ballots be personally delivered or received by mail. The Secretary shall have available ballots which may be marked in the Board of Directors meeting room on the election day by the qualified electors. Section 8. This Board of Directors hereby further finds that the provision of the Law requiring a minimum of 90 days following the adoption of the Resolution of Formation to elapse before said special election is for the protection of the qualified electors of the District. The petitions previously submitted by the landowners in the District each contain an acknowledgment of a waiver of any time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and of a waiver of any requirement for analysis and arguments in connection with the election. Accordingly, this Board of Directors finds and determines that the qualified electors have been fully apprised of and have agreed to the shortened time for the election and waiver of analysis -2- and arguments, and have thereby been fully protected in these proceedings. This Board of Directors also finds and determines that the Secretary has concurred in the shortened time for the election. Section 9. Pursuant to the Local Agency Special Tax and Bond Accountability Act, Sections 50075.1 et. seq. and Sections 53410 et. seq. of the California Government Code, (a) the ballot measure referred to in Sections 2 and 4 above contains a statement indicating the specific purposes of the special tax, the proceeds of the special tax will be applied only to the purposes specified in the ballot measure, there shall be created by the Treasurer an account into which proceeds of the special tax levies will be deposited, and the Treasurer is hereby directed to provide an annual report to this Board of Directors as required by Section 50075.3 of the California Government Code; and (b) the ballot measure contains a statement indicating the specific purposes of the bonds, the proceeds of the bonds will be applied only to the purposes specified in the ballot measure, there shall be created by the Treasurer an account into which the proceeds of the bonds will be deposited, and the Treasurer is hereby directed to provide an annual report to this Board of Directors as required by Section 53411 of the California Government Code. Section 10. The Secretary is hereby directed to cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation circulating within the District a copy of this Resolution and a copy of the Resolution to Incur" Indebtedness, as soon as practicable after the date of adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a rneeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 05-_ was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -4- EXHIBIT A TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) OFFICIAL BALLOT Special Tax and Bond Election (January 11, 2005) This ballot is for a special, landowner election. You must return this ballot in the enclosed postage paid envelope to the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority no later than immediately after adoption of the resolution of the Board of Directors calling said election, either by mail or in person. To vote, mark a cross (X) on the voting line after the word "YES" or after the word "NO". All marks otherwise made are forbidden. All distinguishing marks are forbidden and make the ballot void. If you wrongly mark, tear, or deface this ballot, return it to the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority and obtain another. BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $55,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District Yes: No. 03-0?JBoripaugh Ranch) (the "District"), the proceeds of which will be used only to finance the costs of certain public improvements and of eliminating a fixed special assessment lien as specified in the Resolution No: of Formation of the District and the costs of issuing the bonds, initially adrninistering the bonds and the District as well as the establishment of appropriate bond reserves; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to be applied only to the payment of the principal and interest upon such bonds to be issued and to replenish the reserves for the bonds, and to pay the costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula in administering the District, and shall the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $55,000,0007 By execution in the space provided below, you also indicate your waiver of the time limit pertaining to the conduct of the election and any requirement for analysis and arguments with respect to the ballot measure, as such waivers are described and permitted by Section 53326(a) and 53327(b) of the California Government Code. Number of Votes: Property Owner: A-1 RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 05- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DECLARING RESULTS OF SPECIAL ELECTION, AND DIRECTING RECORDING OF NOTICE OF SPECIAL TAX LIEN - RORIPAUGH RANCH 03-02 WHEREAS, in proceedings heretofore conducted by this Board of Directors pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), this Board of Directors on this date adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Calling Special Election Within Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)", calling for a special election of the qualified electors within the Temecula Public Financing Authority Cornmunity Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "Districf'); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of said resolution, which are by this reference incorporated herein, the special election was held on this date, and the Secretary has on file a Canvass and Statement of Results of Election, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, this Board of Directors has reviewed the canvass and hereby approves it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority as follows: Section 1. The issues presented at the special election were the incurring of a bonded indebtedness in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $55,000,000, the levy of a special tax within the District to be levied in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes heretofore approved by this Board of Directors by its resolution adopted this date entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), Authorizing Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the Districf', and the approval of an appropriations limit of not to exceed $55,000,000 pursuant to said resolution. Section 2. Pursuant to the canvass of the special election on file with the Secretary, the issues presented at the special election were approved by the qualified electors of the District by more than two-thirds of the votes cast at the special election. Section 3. Pursuant to the voter approval, the District is hereby declared to be fully formed with the authority to incur bonded indebtedness and to levy special taxes as heretofore provided in these proceedings and in the Law. Section 4. It is hereby found that all prior proceedings and actions taken by this Board of Directors with respect to the District were valid and in conformity with the Law. Section 5. The Secretary is hereby directed to execute and cause to be recorded in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside a notice of special tax lien in the form required by the Law, said recording to occur no later than fifteen days following adoption by the Board of Directors of this Resolution. Section 6. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 05-_ was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -2- EXHIBIT A CANVASS AND STATEMENT OF RESULT OF ELECTION TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) I hereby certify that on January 11, 2005, I canvassed the returns of the special election held on January 11, 2005, in the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) and the total number of ballots cast in said District and the total number of votes cast for and against the measure are as follows and the totals as shown for and against the measure are full, true and correct: Qualified Landowner' Votes Votes Cast YES NO Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03- 02 (Roripaugh Ranch) Special Tax and Bond Election January 11 , 2005. BALLOT MEASURE: Shall the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") incur an indebtedness and issue bonds in one or more series in the maximum aggregate principal amount of $55,000,000, with interest at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum interest rate permitted by law at the time of sale of such bonds on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) (the "District"), the proceeds of which will be used only to finance the costs of certain public improvements and of eliminating a fixed special assessment lien as specified in the Resolution of Formation of the District and the costs of issuing the bonds, initially administering the bonds and the District as well as the establishment of appropriate bond reserves; shall a special tax payable solely from lands within the District be levied annually upon lands within the District to be applied only to the payment of the principal and interest upon such bonds to be issued and to replenish the reserves for the bonds, and to pay the costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula in administering the District, and shall the annual appropriations limit of the District be established in the amount of $55,000,000? IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I HAVE HEREUNTO SET MY HAND this 11th day of January, 2005. By: Susan W. Jones, Secretary Temecula Public Financing Authority A-1 ORDINANCE NO. TPFA 05-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY LEVYING SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 03-02 (RORIPAUGH RANCH) WHEREAS, on August 24, 2004, this Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Declaring Its Intention to Establish a Community Facilities District and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein - Roripaugh Ranch" (the "Resolution of Intention"), stating its intention to establish the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Law"), to finance costs of certain public improvements (the "Facilities"), and to finance the costs to eliminate a fixed special assessment lien (the "Prior Lien"); and WHEREAS, the Resolution of Intention called for a public hearing on the District to be held on September 28, 2004; and WHEREAS, on September 28, 2004, this Board of Directors adopted a Resolution amending the Resolution of Intention (the "Amending Resolution") to add additional facilities eligible to be funded by the District and to change the date of the public hearing from September 28, 2004 to November 9, 2004; and WHEREAS, on November 9, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the public hearing and continued the public hearing to November 23, 2004, on November 23, 2004 this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and again continued the public hearing to December7,2004;and WHEREAS, on December 7, 2004, this Board of Directors opened the continued public hearing and adopted a resolution making findings of complexity of the District, and then continued the public hearing to January 11, 2005; and WHEREAS, notice was published as required by the Law of the public hearing called pursuant to the Resolution of Intention relative to the intention of this Board of Directors to form the District and to provide for the costs of the Facilities, and the costs to eliminate the Prior Lien; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2005 this Board of Directors held the continued public hearing as required by Law relative to the determination to proceed with the formation of the District and the Rate and Method; and WHEREAS, at the public hearing all persons desiring to be heard on all matters pertaining to the formation of the District and the levy of special taxes in the District were heard, substantial evidence was presented and considered by this Board of Directors and a full and fair hearing was held; and WHEREAS, subsequent to said hearing, this Board of Directors adopted resolutions entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Formation of Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch), Authorizing the Levy of a Special Tax Within the District, Preliminarily Establishing an Appropriations Limit for the District and Submitting Levy of the Special Tax and the Establishment of the Appropriations Limit to the Qualified Electors of the Districf' (the "Resolution of Formation"), "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Determining the Necessity to Incur Bonded Indebtedness Within Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch) and Submitting Proposition to the Qualified Electors of the District" (the "Resolution of Necessity") and "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Calling Special Election Within Community Facilities District No. 03-02 (Roripaugh Ranch)", which resolutions established the District, authorized the levy of a special tax with the District, and called an election within the District on the proposition of incurring indebtedness, levying a special tax and establishing an appropriations limit within the District, respectively; and WHEREAS, on January 11, 2005 an election was held within the District in which the then two eligible landowner electors approved said propositions. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority ordains as follows: Section 1. By the passage of this Ordinance this Board of Directors hereby authorizes and levies special taxes within the District, pursuant to the Law, at the rate and in accordance with the rate and method of apportionment of special taxes for the District approved by the Resolution of Formation (the "Rate and Method") which Resolution is by this reference incorporated herein. The special taxes are hereby levied commencing in the current fiscal year and in each fiscal year thereafter until payment in full of any bonds issued by the Authority for the District (the "Bonds") as contemplated by the Resolution of Formation and the Resolution of Necessity, and payment in full all costs of administering the District. Section 2. The Authority Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed each fiscal year to determine the specific special tax rate and amount to be levied for each parcel of real property within the District, in the manner and as provided in the Resolution of Formation. Section 3. Properties or entities of the State, federal or local governments shall be exempt from any levy of the special taxes, to the extent set forth in the Rate and Method attached as Exhibit B to the Resolution of Intention. In no event shall the special taxes be levied on any parcel within the District in excess of the maximum tax specified in the Rate and Method. Section 4. All of the collections of the special tax shall be used as provided for in the Law and in the Resolution of Formation including the payment of principal and interest on the Bonds, the replenishment of the reseNes for the Bonds, the payment of the costs of the Authority and the City of Temecula in administering the District, and the costs of collecting and administering the special tax. Section 5. The special taxes shall be collected from time to time as necessary to meet the financial obligations of the District on the secured real property tax roll in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem taxes are collected. The special taxes shall have the same lien priority, and be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in cases of delinquency as provided for ad valorem taxes. In addition, the provisions of Section 53356.1 of the California Government Code shall apply to delinquent special tax payments. The Treasurer is hereby authorized and directed to provide all necessary information to the auditor/tax collector -2- of the County of Riverside and to otherwise take all actions necessary in order to effect proper billing and collection of the special tax, so that the special tax shall be levied and collected in sufficient amounts and at the times necessary to satisfy the financial obligations of the District in each fiscal year until the Bonds are paid in full and provision has been made for payment of all of the administrative costs of the District. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasurer may collect one or more installments of the special taxes on anyone or more parcels in the District by means of direct billing by the Authority of the property owners within the District, if any of the Bonds bear interest at a variable interest rate, or otherwise if, in the judgment of the Treasurer, such means of collection will reduce the administrative burden on the Authority in administering the District or is otherwise appropriate in the circumstances. In such event, the special taxes shall become delinquent if not paid when due as set forth in any such respective billing to the applicable property owners. Section 6. If for any reason any portion of this Ordinance is found to be invalid, or if the special tax is found inapplicable to any particular parcel within the District, by a Court of competent jurisdiction, the balance of this Ordinance, and the application of the special tax to the remaining parcels within the District shall not be affected. INTRODUCED, and the first reading occurred on January 11, 2005; and PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting held on the day , 2005. Jeff Cornerchero, Chairperson ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -3- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan Jones, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, HEREBY DO CERTIFY that the foregoing Ordinance No. TPFA 05-_ was duly adopted at a special meeting of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority on the day of , 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: BOARDMEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARDMEMBERS: BOARDMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk/Authority Secretary -4- ITEM 16 APPROVAL I.l CITY ATTORNEy'i{)(?{it:'::--. DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER --4AJ- CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: '- J City Manager/City Council ;yJ'\I'william G. Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Amendments to TUMF Ordinance PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Managernent Analyst RECOMMENDATION: Ordinance entitled: That the City Council introduce and read by title only an ORDINANCE NO. 05-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, SECTION 4(A); SECTION 6(B), AND SECTION 11 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ALLOWING FOR FUTURE FEE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION (TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM) BACKGROUND: On January 28, 2003, the City Council enacted Ordinance No. 03-01, establishing the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF), which is levied and collected from new residential and non-residential development. The purpose of the TUMF is to finance the construction of regional road improvements and transportation programs. Once collected, TUMF is transmitted to the TUMF Program Administrator (the Western Riverside Council of Governments, or WRCOG) for allocation and expenditure. The TUMF for residential construction became effective on March 31, 2003. The TUMF for non- residential development are being phased in over a three-year period beginning July 1, 2004. The TUMF Ordinance also provides that the fee schedule be periodically reviewed and amounts adjusted (up or down) to reflect changes in the actual and estimated costs of constructing the regional transportation systern improvements and the irnplementation of regional transportation projects. The purpose of these adjustments serves to maintain pace with inflation, and maintains the "buying power" of the dollar during the span of the TUMF Program. The national construction cost index (CCI) is used being as the foundation for adjusting TUMF Program costs. In April 2004, the WRCOG Executive Committee approved a 1.5% correction to the TUMF network but did not seek to increase the fees at that time, opting to include the correction concurrently with the future annual index adjustment. In Septernber 2004, the western cities Public Works Directors recommended a 7.38% CCI based on 13 months (utilizing the nationai source data discussed above) and the 1.5% network correction for a total fee adjustment of approximately 8.88%. R\agdrpt\05\0111\TUMFordinance.1 stAmendment In cooperation with the TUMF Administrator, staff has determined that due to increased costs the schedule of fees should be adjusted to ensure the availability of sufficient funds for future transportation projects. Based on staff's evaluation, the adjusted fees for all new construction are proposed to take effect beginning April 1, 2005. For future efficiency, this ordinance also provides for fee adjustments to occur via resolution rather than by ordinance amendments. The respective TUMF allocable to new residential and non-residential development in the City of Ternecula would increase from the current fee structure by the following amounts: TUMF Adjusted Fee Schedule (All Fee Categories at 100%) Fee Category Units Current Fee Per Unit" effective March 31, 2003 DU $6,650 $4,607 $1.45 $7.81 $4.84 $7,248 $5,021 $1.58 $8.51 $5.28 Multi-Famil Residential DU Industrial SF GFA Retail Commercial SF GFA Service Commercial SF GFA "All fees identified at 1 00% SF GFA = Square Foot Gross Floor Area For non-residential uses, the TUMF will continue to be phased in over the three year period beginning April 1, 2005, at one-third the fee; increasing July 1, 2005 to two-thirds the fee; and reaching 100% of the applicable fee on July 1, 2006, as follows: TUMF Non-Residential Phase-In Adjusted Fee Schedule Adjusted Fee Adjusted Fee Adjusted Fee TUMF Land Use Units Per Unit Per Unit Per Unit Type 4/1/05 - 6/30/05 7/1/05 - 6/30/06 (100% of TUMF) . 7/1/06 Industrial SF GFA $0.52 $1.05 $1.58 Retail SF GFA $2.83 $5.67 $8.51 Service SF GFA $1.75 $3.52 $5.28 Staff has reviewed the proposed amendments to the TUMF Ordinance for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The proposed amendments regarding TUMF program irnprovements represent components of the adopted General Plan that have already received the appropriate review when the project was approved. Based upon this review, staff is recommending that the Council make a finding that the ordinance is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15162(a) and 15061(b)(3). Section 15162 states that when an EIR has been certified for a project, no additional environmental review is required. The Final EIR for the City General Plan was certified on November 9, 1993. R\agdrpt\05\0111\TUMFordinance.1stAmendment Furthermore, specific projects covered by this program will receive environrnental review prior to their commencernent. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance No. 05-_ R:\agdrptI05\0111\TUMFordinance.1slAmendment ORDINANCE NO. 05-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING CHAPTER 15.08, SECTION 4(A); SECTION 6(B), AND SECTION 11 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, AND ALLOWING FOR FUTURE FEE ADJUSTMENTS TO BE ESTABLISHED BY RESOLUTION (TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE PROGRAM) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Chapter 15.08, Section 4(A) of the Municipal Code of the City of Temecula is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. Establishment of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (A) Adoption. There is hereby adopted the following schedule of fees: $ 7,248 per Single-Family Residential Unit $ 5,021 per Multi-Family Residential Unit $ 1.58 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of an Industrial Project $ 8.51 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Retail Commercial Project $ 5.28 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Service Commercial Project Section 2: Chapter 15.08, Section 6(B) of the Municipal Code of the City of Temecula is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. Procedures for the Levy, Collection and Disposition of Fees (B) Payment of the fees. i. The fees shall be paid at the time a building permit is issued for the Development Project. ii. For non-residential projects the fees shall be phased-in as follows: From April 1, 2005 to June 30, 2005, the fee schedule shall be: $0.52 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of an Industrial Project $2.83 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Retail Commercial Project $1.75 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Service Commercial Project From July 1, 2005 to June 30, 2006, the fee schedule shall be: $1.05 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of an Industrial Project $5.67 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Retail Commercial Project $3.52 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Service Commercial Project On July 1, 2006 and thereafter, the fee schedule shall be: $1.58 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of an Industrial Project $8.51 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Retail Commercial Project $5.28 per Square Foot of Gross Floor Area of a Service Commercial Project iii. The fees required to be paid shall be the fee arnounts in effect at the time of payment. R\agdrpt\05\0111\TUMFordinance.1 s!Amendment iv. If all or part of any development project is sold prior to payment of the fee, the property shall continue to be subject to the requirement for payment of the fee, accordingly, the fees shall run with the land. v. Fees shall not be waived. vi. After April 1, 2005, fee adjustments shall be established by resolution as . adopted by the City Council. Section 3: Chapter 15.08, Section 11 of the Municipal Code of the City of Temecula is hereby amended to read as follows: 11. Effective Date The provisions of this Ordinance shall take effect on April 1 , 2005. Section 4. The potential improvements to be funded through the TUMF program represent components of the adopted General Plan that has already received the appropriate review when the General Plan was approved. Based upon this fact, the City Council hereby finds that the adoption of this ordinance is exempt from further review pursuant to CEQA Guideline Sections 15162(a) and 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines. Section 15162 states that when an EIR has been certified for a project, no additional environrnental review is required unless there is substantial evidence that the project has changed. The Final EIR for the City General Plan was certified on November 9, 1993. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula the 11 th day of January, 2005. Jeff Cornerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk R\agdrpt\05\0111\TUMFordinance.1 stAmendment (SEAL) STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CITY OF TEMECULA " I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do herby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 05-_ was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11th day of January, 2005, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\agdrpt\05\0111\TUMFordinance.1slAmendment ITEM 17 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY <-itJj7~- DIRECTOR OF FIN9CY-~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Debbie Ubnoske, Director of PlanninPt DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Planning Application for a Specific Plan Amendment to the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) (PA04-0486) PREPARED BY: Dale West, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: Introduce and read by title only, an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 05._ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-3) ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46, TO ALLOW "NO MINIMUM" BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY LINES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 46 AS LONG AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS USED SOLELY FOR RECREATION, OPEN SPACE OR PARKING PURPOSES. (PLANNING APPLICATION 04-0486) BACKGROUND: The Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) was originally adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in 1986. Since this time, it has been amended 5 times. In 1988, the first amendment to the Specific Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors. Following the incorporation of the City of Temecula, the second, third, fourth and fifth amendments to the Specific Plan were approved by the City of Temecula City Council in 1996, 1997,1998, and 2000, respectively. A sixth amendment to the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) is being proposed by the M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC in anticipation of the future sale of the Temeku Hills Golf Course property which includes the Temeku Hills Clubhouse and ancillary recreation facilities (swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot). The M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC and the Temeku Hills Homeowners Association (HOA) have worked out an agreement that involves subdividing Lot 25 (the Temeku Hills Clubhouse and Recreation Facilities) into two parcels. The first parcel (clubhouse and parking facilities) will be jointly owned by the new owner of the golf course and the HOA. The second parcel (swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot) will be deeded to the HOA. However, the proposed property line locations for subdividing Lot 25 would not meet the current setback requirements established in the Specific Plan. In order to allow for R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Staff Report.doc the transfer of ownership to the HOA, the setback requirements need to be revised to allow a "no minimum" building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46 as long as the adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes. Once this amendment is approved, the applicant has indicated that they intend to submit an application for a parcel map to finalize the transfer of ownership. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Specific Plan Amendment on December 15, 2004, and voted 3-0-2 to adopt the Resolution recommending that the City Council adopt the proposed Ordinance amending the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) to allow a "no minimum" building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: This amendment to the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) represents a rninor change to the zoning standards within Planning Area 46. Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment to the Specific Plan and has determined that the project has no potential to result in any negative impacts to the environrnent. The Planning Commission concurred and is recommending that the City Council make a finding that there is no potential to have an impact and that no environmental review is required pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. FISCAL IMPACT: Amendment. No fiscal irnpact is anticipated as a result of this Specific Plan ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Resolution No. 05-_ 2. Proposed Ordinance No. 05-_ 3. Final Planning Commission Resolution No. 2004-070 4. Planning Commission Staff Report 12/15/04 5. Conceptual Lot Line Configuration R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Staff Report.doc ATTACHMENT NO.1 PROPOSED CC RESOLUTION 05-_ R:\S P AI20Q4\04-0486 MarQarita Village\CC Staff Report.doc RESOLUTION NO. 05"_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0486 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6) TO AMEND THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN'S (SP-3) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3); and B. M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA04-0486, Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; and C. The application for the Project was processed as required by law, including the California Environmental Quality Act; and D. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on December 15, 2004 to consider the applications for the Project and environmental determination, at which tirne the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did, testify either in support or opposition to this matter; and E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.2004-070, recommending approval of the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) Amendment No.6; and F. The City Council has held a duly noticed public hearing on January 11, 2005 to consider the proposed Specific Plan Amendment; and G. On January 11, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters; and H. January 11, 2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) Amendment No. 6 when it adopted Resolution No. 05- R:\S P A\2004\04~0486 Margarita Village\CC Reso.doc Section 2. Findinqs. The City Council, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA04-0486 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.16.020.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). The proposed project is an existing golf course with a clubhouse and recreation amenities surrounded by detached single family residential property. The proposed project and surrounding area is currently built out with no future plans for expansion. The M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC and the Temeku Hills Homeowners Association (HOA) have worked out an agreement that involves subdividing Lot 25 (the Terneku Hills Clubhouse and Recreation Facilities) into two parcels. The first parcel (clubhouse and parking facilities) will be jointly owned by the new owner of the golf course and the HOA. The second parcel (swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot) will be deeded to the HOA. In order to allow for the transfer of ownership to the HOA, the building setbacks need to be revised to allow a "no minimum" building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46, as long as the adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes. The proposed project is a minor revision to the Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance allowing the clubhouse and recreation facility property to be transferred to the Homeowner's Association. There is no possibility that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore it is not subject to CEQA. Section 4. The City of Temecula City Council hereby approves Planning Application No. PA04-0486, Amendment NO.6 to the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A and subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula City Council this _ day of _ 2005. R:\S P A\20Q4\Q4-0486 Margarita Village\CC ResQ.doc 2 Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 2005 by the following vote of the Council: AYES: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS Susan Jones, CMC, City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04~0486 Margarita Village\CC Reso.doc 3 EXHIBIT A MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-3) AMENDMENT NO.6 R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Villagc\CC Reso.doc 4 Amendment No.6 of Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 City of Temecula October 2004 Margarita Village Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Specific Plan Amendment Rationale...... ......... ............ .............. .... ...... ............ .....Section 1 Summary of Changes............ ....... ....... ....... ............ .............. .... ...... ...... ........ ..Section 2 Specific Plan Zone Ordinance... ...... ...... ......... ......... ..:..... ....... ...... .... ........ ........ . Section 3 Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No.6 Specific Plan Amendment Rationale \J _~'~';Oi~m~ ~garita Village Specific Plan Amendment Rationale SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT RATIONALE The applicant is requesting an Amendment to the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan (SP No. 199) to allow for no minimum building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46 if the adjacent use is recreation, open space or parking. This amendment would entail a minor revision to the Specific Plan zoning ordinance. The rationale for this amendment is to allow adjacent recreation facilities including a pool, tot lot and tennis courts to be divided into a separate lot for dedication to the Temeku Hills Homeowners Association, as depicted in Figure 1, Clubhouse, Common Areas and Recreation Areas. The creation of an additional lot for the clubhouse and parking lot is also necessary as it will be jointly owned by the future owner of the adjacent golf course and the Temeku Hills Homeowners Association. The remaining portion of the existing lot will be owned by the future golf course owner. These actions will be accomplished through the subsequent creation of a parcel map. Due to the proximity of the recreational facilities to the golf course clubhouse, setback requirements for Planning Area 46 must necessarily be amended to require no minimum setback from adjoining property lines. The proposed amendment will accomplish this intent more effectively than the Specific Plan as currently written. As a result of this amendment, the Specific Plan zoning ordinance for Planning Area 46 will be revised to require no minimum building setback from adjoining property lines if the adjacent use is recreation, open space or parking. Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No.6 Q) Summary of Changes \.i -..~.'\')Ii:II,;.':;;;"i)j.~ Margarita Village I. Summary of Changes I. SUMMARY OF CHANGES A. SPECIFIC PLAN The MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan (SP No. 199) was adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors on August 26, 1986 through Resolution No. 86-355. Specific Plan Amendment No.1 was approved by the Board of Supervisors on September 6, 1988 via Resolution No. 88-471. In 1989, the City of Temecula incorporated and assumed jurisdiction over MARGARITA VILLAGE. Since 1989, four additional amendments to the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan were recorded for a total of five previous amendments to SP No. 199. Amendment No. 6 to the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan will arnend the Specific Plan zoning text to allow for no minimum setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46. This revision will allow the adjacent recreation facilities including a pool, tot lot and tennis courts to be divided into a separate lot for dedication to the Temeku Hills Homeowner's Association. It will also allow for the creation on an additional lot for the clubhouse and parking lot, which will be jointly owned by the future golf course owner and the Temeku Hills Homeowner's Association. The following describes the minor revision to the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan that has occurred as a result of these amendments. 1. SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Amendment No. 6 of the MARGARITA VILLAGE Specific Plan (SP No. 199) updates text within the Specific Plan zoning ordinance to allow for no minimum setback requirement from adjacent property lines if the adjacent property is used for recreation, open space or for parking purposes. Specific Plan No. 199: Amendment No.6 Page I-I Specific P~an Zone Ordinance u ,. ....~~l!dl:'f.':lO (2) The development standards for Planning Area 43 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those standards identified for the M Residential District in Section 17.06.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code, except for the following: A. Minimum net lot area shall not be less than four thousand five hundred (4,500) square feet. B. No lot shall have more than sixty percent (60%) of its net area covered with buildings or structures. C. The minimum average width of a lot shall be thirty-eight feet (38') with a minimum lot depth of sixty-five feet (65f). Minimum lot width at the required front property line shall be thirty-eight feet (38'). D. The front yard setback including garages shall be not less than ten feet (10'). E. The sum of the interior side yard setbacks shall be not less than ten feet (10'). This permits a zero lot line arrangement with a zero setback on one side yard and ten feet on the opposite side yard. Comer side yards shall not be less than ten feet (10'). F. The rear yard shall be not less than ten feet (lOf). G. There shall be no maximum % of lot coverage requirement. (3) Except as provided above, all other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Chapter 17.06 of the City of Temecula Development Code. qq. Planning Area 44. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 44 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those uses permitted in the PR District of Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecula Development Code. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 44 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those standards identified for the PR District in Section 17.14.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. (3) Except as provided above, an other zoning requirements shan be the same as those requirements identified in Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecula Development Code. IT. Planning Area 45. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 45 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those uses permitted in the PR District of Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecula Development Code. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 45 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those standards identified for the PR District in Section 17.14.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. (3) Except as provided above, an other zoning requirements shall be the same as those requirements identified in Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecula Development Code. ss. Planning Area 46. (1) The uses permitted in Planning Area 46 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those uses permitted in the PR District of Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecula Development Code. (2) The development standards for Planning Area 46 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those standards identified for the PR District in Section 17.14.040 of the City ofTemecula Development Code except that there shall be no minimum building setback requirement from adioining property lines if the adiacent property is used solei v for recreation, open space or for parking purposes. (3) Except as provided above, an other zoning requirements shan be the same as those requirements identified in Chapter 17.14 of the City of Temecu1a Development Code. -16- EXHIBIT B DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Reso.doc 5 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0486 Project Description: A Specific Plan Amendment to revise the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) Zoning Ordinance to allow a "no minimum" building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46 as long as the adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes. Approval Date: December 15, 2004 Expiration Date: None PLANNING DEPARTMENT Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition. General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. The applicant shall sign both copies of the final conditions of approval that will be provided by the Planning Department staff, and return one signed set to the Planning Department for their files. R:\S P A\2004\Q4-0486 Margarita Village\CC Reso.doc 6 4. All existing and future buildings shall meet fire resistive construction standards as set forth by Table 5-A of the California Building Code. BUILDING DEPARTMENT 5. Development plans must show any fire resistive wall construction based upon proximity to property lines or other buildings on the same property as per California Building Code Table 5-A. New property lines created may impact existing buildings exterior wall construction and openings. By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Reso.doc' 7 ATTACHMENT NO.2 PROPOSED CC ORDINANCE 05-_ R:\S P AI2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC StaH Report.doc ORDINANCE NO. 05-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN (SP-3) ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46, TO ALLOW "NO MINIMUM" BUILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENT FROM ADJOINING PROPERTY LINES WITHIN PLANNING AREA 46 AS LONG AS THE ADJACENT PROPERTY IS USED SOLELY FOR RECREATION, OPEN SPACE OR PARKING PURPOSES. (PLANNING APPLICATION 04-0486) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3); and B. M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC filed Planning Application No. PA04-0486 for a Specific Plan Amendment to amend the building setback requirernents in Planning Area 46. C. The application for the Project was processed and is exempt from CEQA review; and D. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on December 15, 2004 to consider the application for the Project and CEQA deterrnination, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; and E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004-070 recommending approval of a Specific Plan Arnendrnent; and F. On January 11, 2005 the City Council of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the Project at which time all persons interested in the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters; and G. On January 11,2005, the City Council of the City of Temecula approved the Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) Amendment No.6. Section 2. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby amends the text for Planning Area 46 of Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP-3) Zoning Ordinance for development standards to read as follows: "(2) The development standards for Planning Area 46 of Specific Plan No. 199 shall be the same as those standards identified for the PR District in Section 17.14.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code except that there shall be no minimum building setback requirement from adjoining property lines if the adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes." R:\S P A\2004\04~0486 Margarita Village\CC Ordinance SPA Draft.doc 1 Section 3. Severabilitv. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that the provisions of this Ordinance are severable and if for any reason a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold any sentence, paragraph, or section of this Ordinance to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining parts of this Ordinance. Section 4. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same to be posted as required by law. Section 5. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause copies of this Ordinance to be posted in three designated posting places. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its passage; and within fifteen (15) days after its passage, together with the names of the City Council members voting thereon, it shall be published in a newspaper published and circulated in said City. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Ordinance SPA Draft.doc 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 05-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the 11 th day of January, 2005 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of , 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\CC Ordinance SPA Draft-doc 3 ATTACHMENT NO.3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-070 R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Mar~arita Village\CC Staff Report.doc PC RESOLUTION NO. 2004-070 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0486 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO.6) TO AMEND THE TEXT WITHIN THE MARGARITA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN'S (SP NO. 199) DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE FOR PLANNING AREA 46. WHEREAS, M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC, filed Planning Application No. PA04- 0486, Specific Plan Amendment in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered Planning Application No. PA04-0486 on December 15, 2004, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended the City Council approve the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the public hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Resolution No. 2004-070, recommending that the City Council approve PA04-0486; WHEREAS, all legal preconditions to the adoption of this resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and the Margarita Village Specific Plan Section 2. FindinQs. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Planning Application No. PA04-0486 hereby makes the following findings as required by Section 17.16.020.E of the City of Temecula Municipal Code: A. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. B. The proposed Specific Plan Amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. C. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. D. The proposed Specific Plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed developrnent in the surrounding neighborhood. R\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita VilIage\Final PC Reso & COA'S-DP.doc t Section 3. Environmental Compliance. This project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15061 (b) (3). The proposed project is an existing golf course with a clubhouse and recreation amenities surrounded by detached single family residential property. The proposed project and surrounding area is currently built out with no future plans for expansion. The proposed project is a minor revision to the Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance solely to transfer ownership of the clubhouse and recreation facility property to the Homeowner's Association. There is no possibility that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore it is not subject to CEQA. Section 4. The City of Temecula Planning Commission, hereby recommends that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA04-0486, Amendment No. 6 to the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 substantially in the form attached to this resolution as Exhibit A and subject to the Conditions of Approval contained in Exhibit B. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 15th day of December 2004. Section 6. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. John Telesio, Chairman ATTEST: Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that PC Resolution No. 2004-070 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 15th day of December 2004, by the following vote of the Commission: AYES: NOES: 3 o PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chiniaeff, Olhasso, Telesio ABSENT: 2 Guerriero, Mathewson ABSTAIN: 0 Debbie Ubnoske, Secretary R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\Final PC Reso & COA'S-DP.doc 2 ATTACHMENT NO.4 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT 12/15/04 R:\S P A\2004\04-0486 Mar~arita Village\CC Stall Report.doc / STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION OR\G\NAL Date of Meeting: December 15, 2004 Prepared by: Dale West Title: Associate Planner File Number PA04-0486 Application Type: Minor Revision (Specific Plan) Project Description: Specific Plan Amendment to reduce the building setback requirement from adjoining properties in Planning Area 46. o Approve with Conditions Recommendation: (Check One) o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: r8l Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial CEQA: (Check One) o Categorically Exempt (Class) (Class) 15162 o Notice of Determination o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan OEIR r8l OTHER: Exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) R:IS P AI2004\04-0486 Margarita VillagelSTAFF REPORT-PC.doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant: M-A Temeku Hills Development, LLC Completion Date: N/A Mandatory Action Deadline Date: N/A General Plan Designation: Open Space (OS) Zoning Designation: Margarita Village Specific Plan (Public Recreation (PR)) Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Temeku Hills Golf Course, Clubhouse and Recreation Facilities North: South: East: West: Residential Residential Residential Residential Lot Area: N/A Total Floor Area/Ratio N/A Landscape Area/Coverage N/A Parking Required/Provided N/A BACKGROUND SUMMARY [8J 1. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with staff's recommendation. ANALYSIS The Margarita Village Specific Plan (SP No. 199) was originally adopted by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors in 1986. Since this time it has been amended 5 times. In 1988 the first amendment to the Specific Plan was approved by the Board of Supervisors. Following the incorporation of the City of Temecula, the second, third, fourth and fifth amendments to the Specific Plan were approved by the City of Temecula City Council in 1996, 1997, 1998, and 2000 respectively. A sixth amendment to the Margarita Village Specific Plan No. 199 is being proposed by the M- A Temeku Hills Development, LLC in anticipation of the future sale of the Temeku Hills Golf Course property which includes the Temeku Hills Clubhouse and ancillary recreation facilities (swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot). The M-A Terneku Hills Development, LLC and the Temeku Hills Homeowners Association (HOA) have worked out an agreement that involves subdividing Lot 25 (the Temeku Hills Clubhouse and Recreation Facilities) into two parcels. R\S P A\2004\04-0486 Margarita Village\STAFF REPORT-PC.doc 2 first parcel (Clubhouse and parking facilities) will be jointly owned by the new owner of the golf course and the HOA. The second parcel (swimming pool, tennis courts and tot lot) will be deeded to the HOA. However, the proposed property line locations for subdividing Lot 25 would not meet the current setback requirements established in the Development Code for the PR zone. In order to allow for the transfer of ownership to the HOA, the setback requirements need to be revised to allow a "no minimum" building setback requirement from adjoining property lines within Planning Area 46 as long as the adjacent property is used solely for recreation, open space or parking purposes. Once this agreement is approved, the applicant has indicated that they intend to submit an application for a parcel map to finalize the transfer of ownership. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION 1:8]1. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed Project is exempt from CEQA review pursuant to Section 15061 (b) (3). The proposed project is an existing golf course with a clubhouse and recreation amenities surrounded by detached single family residential property. The proposed project and surrounding area is currently built out with no future plans for expansion. The proposed project is a minor revision to the Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance solely to transfer ownership of the clubhouse and recreation facility property to the Homeowner's Association. There is no possibility that the proposed project will have a significant effect on the environment and therefore it is not subject to CEQA. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Planning Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve Planning Application No. PA04-0486 based upon the findings and attached Conditions of Approval. FINDINGS Specific Plan Zoning District (Code Section 17.16.020 E) 1. The proposed Specific Plan is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed amendment would not change the use of the site and is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code. The proposed revision to the property line setback is allowable under an approved Specific Plan zoning ordinance. 2. The proposed specific plan would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. The proposed amendment does not change the existing conditions of the site. Buildings affected by the proposed setback changes will be subject to provisions of Table 5-A of the California Building Code and therefore will not result in any detriment to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the city. 3. The subject property is physically suitable for the requested land use designations and the anticipated land use developments. R:\S P AI2004I04.0486 Margarita VillagelSTAFF REPORT-PCdoc 3 The proposed amendment does not change the land use designations and the site is currently built to its ultimate development plans. 4. The proposed specific plan shall ensure development of desirable character which will be compatible with existing and proposed development in fhe surrounding neighborhood. There is no additional proposed development with the proposed amendment and therefore is compatible with the existing surrounding neighborhood. ATTACHMENTS 1. PC Resolution No. 2004-_ - Blue Page 5 Exhibit A - Specific Plan No. 199 Amendment No.6 Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval 2. CC Resolution No. 04-_ - Blue Page 6 3. CC Ordinance No. 04- _ - Blue Page 7 R:IS P A\2004104.0486 Margarita VillagelSTAFF REPORT-PC.doc 4 ATTACHMENT NO.5 CONCEPTUAL LOT LINE CONFIGURATION A:\S P A\2004\Q4-Q486 Margarita village\CC Staff Report.doc (/)(f) QJI ~ <(<( OJ) ~ co WW ~ u: cut:: <(<( - - zz .~ 00 > ~- !;j: ~ ~W ..- 00::: .~ Uu l-o WW ~ w (/)0::: OJ) l< =>w =>0::: l-o !;z 00 ~ "-:; [iJ~ IO ~ Ull< COD OW =>f- 0.0. -1=> 00 l<l< Uo 0.0. ~ w/ l< l=w =>z "-:; [iJ~ Ull< ow 0.0. 00 l<l< 0.0. ~ J ~~ =>> ~-~ 01 us:;; lJ;:< E Z:iS B zI~ t ~~~ ~ D..~~ I ~~~ i ...~ -.* .~ ITEM 18 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: APPROVAL 'A'~~ CITY ATTORNEY -t-V~ DIRECTOR OF FINANCj: Gic--- CITY MANAGER f(JJ I CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT City Manager/CirWfrcil Debbie Ubnosk~irector of Planning January 11, 2005 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment, PA04-0370 General Plan Amendment; PA04-0371 Specific Plan Amendment; PA04-0369 Tentative Tract Map (32004); PA04-0590 Amendment to Development Agreement PREPARED BY: Dan Long, Associate Planner RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recomrnends that the City Council adopt the following Ordinance and Resolutions. 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 7B IN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), AND CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW-ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E), LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0370). 2. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF PLANNING AREA 78 FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW-ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E), MODIFY THE FUEL MODIFICATION R:\S P AI2004\04-0371. Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC Staff Report.1.doc 1 ZONE BOUNDARY, ADD ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCEESSORY STRUCTURES, AMEND THE DESCRIPTION SUMMARIES OF PLANNING AREAS 1 A, 7B, 10, 12, AND 27, REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND MAKE OTHER MINOR TEXT CHANGES TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0371). 3. Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 05- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE A LOW- ESTATE ZONE, AND ADD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, GARAGES AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO YARD AREAS (PA04-0371). 4. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04-0369 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32004) TO CREATE 6 ADDITIONAL LOTS AND MODIFY THE CONFIGURATION OF A TOTAL OF 18 LOTS IN PLANING AREA 1A TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENSION OF A CUL-DE-SAC, LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0369). 5. Adopt an ordinance entitled: ORDINANCE NO. 05- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0590) BACKGROUND: On May 26, 2004, the Applicant's representative for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan approached City Staff and requested consideration of several changes to the Specific Plan. The initial changes requested were to move the fuel modification area due to concerns expressed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that the fuel modification zone was originally R:\S P A\2004\04-0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC Staff Report-l.doc 2 located in habitat area, and to add six lots to the panhandle area as a result of a detention basin no longer being needed on site. Staff was supportive of both of these changes. As discussions progressed on the Specific Plan Amendment, a number of other items were requested to be included. On May 26, 2004, the Applicant, Ashby USA, LLC filed the following applications: . General Plan Amendment (PA04-0370): Change the General Plan land-use designation in Planning Area 7B from Open Space (OS), which was designated for a detention basin that is no longer needed, to Low Medium Residential (LM); merge Planning Area 7B into Planning Area 1 A; and change the land-use designation of Planning Area 10 from Low Density Residential (L) to Low Estate Residential (L-E). . Specific Plan Amendment (PA04-0371): Change the land-use designation of Planning Area 7B from Open Space (OS) to Low Medium Residential and merge Planning Area 7B into Planning Area 1 A; change the land-use designation of Planning Area 10 from Low Density Residential (L) to Low Estate Residential (L-E); modify fuel modification zone boundaries, revise the Design Guidelines to include additional inspirational photos and include additional text for implementation purposes, add development standards for accessory structures, amend the description summaries of Planning Areas 1A, 7B, 10, 12, and 27, and other minor text changes and clean-up items. . Tentative Parcel Map (PA04-0369): Subdivide two acres, creating an additional six lots within Planning Area 1 A and modify a total of 18 lots to accommodate the extension of a cul-de-sac (Skyline Drive). The additional two acres is a result of the General Plan Amendment to eliminate the detention basin. On November 30,2004, the applicant filed the following application: . Amendment to Developrnent Agreement (PA04-0590): The proposed DA Amendment will allow a total of 515 residential building permits to be issued in Planning Areas 1A, 2, 3, 4A and 4B, however in order to issue the 2581h building permit, the City Manager shall make a determination that the permanent fire station is substantially under construction, transportation improvements required to be installed prior to the 258th building permit as mentioned in Attachment 5A are complete, permanent access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, including the bridges on said roads will be completed upon the opening of the permanent fire station and all other requirements of the Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval have been fulfilled. There are no changes proposed that will affect the timing of the issuance of the first building permit. This project was presented to the Planning Commission on December 15, 2004. The Planning Commission voted 3-0 recommending that the City Council approve the project. Commissioners Guerriero and Mathewson were absent. DISCUSSION: PLANNING COMMISSION ANALYSIS The Planning Commission reviewed the staff report of record and recommended that the City Council approve the project based on the following analysis: R:\S P A\2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch-l\CC Staff Report-l.doc 3 General Plan Amendment The proposed land use change from Open Space (OS) to Low Medium Residential (LM) is a result of storm drain improvements off-site that no longer require an on-site detention basin. The 2.0 acres of Open Space area, currently designed as a detention basin is longer necessary because an adjacent development immediately to the west is currently underway, which will allow a City maintained storm drain to connect to the Roripaugh Ranch project site. The storm drain will be owned and maintained by the City and does not require a third party agreement to connect the storm drain to the Roripaugh Ranch project. City staff has studied the flow capacity and has determined that the storm drain connection can accommodate the flow of the Roripaugh Ranch project. These 2.0 acres are not needed for additional parks or public uses since the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan exceeds the open space and parkland dedication requirements. The City of Temecula Public Works Department and Community Services Department has reviewed and recommended approval of the request. The proposed land use change from Low Density Residential (L) to Low Estate Residential (L- E) in Planning Area 10 is a result of required changes to the fuel modification zone. The change will permit minirnum lot sizes of 10,000 square feet to create a new fuel modification zone outside the boundaries of the habitat area. Specific Plan Amendment The proposed Specific Plan Amendment is a request to make changes that will bring the Specific Plan into conformance with the related General Plan Amendment. In addition, state and federal agencies have submitted documentation to the City indicating that the Fuel Modification Zone is not permitted in the habitat open space area. Structures are not perrnitted within the Fuei Modification Zone boundary. Since the Fuel Modification Zone is not permitted in the habitat open space area, the Fuel Modification Zone boundary is required to be located in an area previously planned for residential dwellings. This change has the potential to reduce the total number of residential dwelling units possible on the perimeter of residential Planning Areas 14, 15, 16 and 17. Until these areas are mapped, it is unknown how much this change will impact unit counts in these Planning Areas. The potential reduction of units will also affect the Community Facility District. The Applicant requested a change to the summary description of Planning Area 10, which will allow for 10,000 square foot lots as opposed to 20,000 square foot lots. Since there are no existing or proposed residential areas abutting Planning Area 10, this request was not an issue. The applicant also requested a change to the summary description of Planning Area 12, which will allow standard products as opposed to clustered products. There are other remaining planning areas (22 and 31) throughout the Specific Plan that maintain the variety of housing types envisioned in the current Specific Plan. If approved, the proposed changes will not result in an increase of residential dwelling units above 2,015. The Applicant has agreed to work with staff to arnend the Design Guidelines. The proposed Design Guidelines include additional text as directed by the Planning Commission and includes the following: . Cleaner descriptions of each architectural style with required integral elements of the structure. R:\S P AI2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC Staff Report.1.doc 4 . Additional inspirational photos that reflect realistic design opportunities. . Additional text directing users to critical sections of the Design Guidelines that provide direction on the importance of entries, doors, windows, garage doors, roof type and pitch, etc. . Language requiring specific core elements and additional style elements. . Adding language that allows the Director of Planning to authorize additional architectural styles in the planning areas that will provide for variety, allow for greater flexibility and identifiable neighborhoods. The additional changes to the Specific Plan were general clean-up iterns or changes that have resulted from the first attempts to implement the Specific Plan. Some of these changes include modifying the fencing plan (colors, materials, location of pilasters, etc.), revising the description and design of Planning Area 27; this increases the acreage of the sports park from 19.7 acres to 21.1 acres. Other changes include revising the cross section details for the Fuel Modification Zone Boundary, revising the nature trails to reflect the eliminated detention basin, adding development standards for the Low-Estate Residential Zone, and adding development standards for accessory structures such as detached garages, porches, balconies, etc. Tentative Tract Map The proposed Tentative Tract Map is a request to subdivide two acres into six additional lots and modify a total of eighteen lots to accommodate the extension of Skyline Drive. A current Tentative Tract Map (29661) has been approved for the project site. Tract Map 29661 was not designed to accommodate residential parcels in the detention basin. As a result of the detention basin becoming a residential use, the proposed Tentative Tract Map will require the reconfiguration of 18 lots to provide access to the new lots. The proposed Tentative Parcel Map is in conformance with the related General Plan and Specific Plan Amendments and the Subdivision Ordinance. Development Aoreement Amendment The Development Agreement Amendment will allow for the panhandle area (pA1A, 2, 3, 4A and 4B) to be built out (515 permits) provided the permanent fire station is substantially under construction, transportation improvements are complete as identified in Attachment 5A, and permanent access on Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, including bridges on said roads are complete. City stalf, including the Fire Chief, has determined that the panhandle area can be built out, without impacting the health, life and safety of the residences, provided these improvements are complete. Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, staff and the applicant discussed the DA Amendment at length and arrived at a final agreement. However, during the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant raised issues of concern regarding the timing of improvements that were not' previously analyzed or agreed to by staff. Due to the fact that staff had not analyzed or reviewed the requested changes, the Planning Commission ultimately decided to vote in favor of the DA Amendment in its current draft form. Environmental Review The proposed project will not increase the maximum number of units (2,015) analyzed in the Final EIR for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC Staff Report-1.doc 5 project description within the EIR and the project will not significantly change the impacts as identified in the EIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from further environmental review, per CEQA Guidelines, Section 15162. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Commission recornmended approval of the project. The Planning Commission discussion revolved around off-site improvements, which is the basis for the General Plan Amendment, content of the Design Guidelines, consistency of the Tentative Tract Map with the development standards, and the timing of improvements as required in the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. The Planning Commission voted 3-0 to approve the project (Commissioners Guerriero and Mathewson were absent). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 05-_ General Plan Amendment Exhibit A - Proposed General Plan Designation 2. Resolution No. 05-_ Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A - Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval 3. Ordinance No. 05-_ Specific Plan Amendment Exhibit A - Zoning Standards 4. Resolution No. 05-_ Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A - Conditions of Approval 5. Ordinance No. 05-_ First Amendment to Developrnent Agreement Exhibit A - First Amendment to Development Agreement 6. Planning Commission Staff Report (December 15, 2004) 7. Excerpt from Draft Planning Commission Minutes (December 15, 2004 R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC Staff Report.1.doc 6 ATTACHMENT NO.1 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 05-_ GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1ICC Staff Report-l.doc 7 CC RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 7B IN THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), AND CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW-ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E), LOCATED NEAR THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0370). WHEREAS, On December 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted an approved Planning Application PA94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99- 0299 (Development Agreement), PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661), and PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353); WHEREAS, On May, 26, 2004, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Appiication No. PA04- 0370 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on December 15, 2004, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which tirne the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on , 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved the Application, and approved a Notice of Determination, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC GPA Draft Resolution.doc 1 Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings: Section 17.16.020.E 1-4 A. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan because the project site is 2.0 acres and includes a tentative tract map for future development that is consistent with the surrounding developed areas. In addition, the project site is within a specific plan in which an EIR has been prepared, adopted, and certified and the proposed amendment is consistent with the review of the EIR. B. The. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because the project site is surrounded by urban development within City boundaries. The proposed use will remain residential and is consistent with the surrounding residential uses. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is consistent with the original adopted and certified EIR (PA94-0076) for the project site. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states than when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Therefore the City Council, pursuant to Section 15162 of CEQA Guidelines finds that no additional environmental review is necessary. Section 4. General Plan Amendment. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Application to amend the General Plan Land Use Map from Open Space (OS) to Low Medium (LM) Density, Residential for Planning Area 7B of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan on property located near the future intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Pourroy Road. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC GPA Draft Resolution.doc 2 [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 05-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04'0371. Roripaugh Ranch.l\CC GPA Draft Resolution.doc 3 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\ee GPA Draft Resolution.doc 4 8 ~ f"".> ~ .::;. '-' P.l ::: :r.:: ...... - ~r ::0 " ~ ... ~ ~ ...., " OZ~~55 41 f; ri:!!!0l!2~~.a ~ Z~CC~O a 0 cn~()5:mm B. ~~~~~~ ~ ~8=l~;c;~ lit ~o3~~Rl Ii :lJOQ Z(.I) J;! ~~$~~~ g ~5:r-~~~ ! 8m mm- Co o~ 3~~ Ii ()~ f!?:m ~ 3 ~ f!?: r " '-.,r ~ I ig r ~ OZ"tl3:;" 9 000-;: If ~ " Jg ~ ~ . rg-l 0 ~ w 0 w ,o>? l~ ~ 0 w ~ r I ~ g I I " i Q c; r '" ~ m ~ I w L r '---~ ~----- Existing General Plan Lan<!.Y~~_p'~~!~~~!!~~~ I 8 .....' "'" ,..... ;::;, ~. Yo ::IJ C 'J~ ..::<... -''y,,\ ~' ::t: " ~ ~ ~ - f~" o ~ Qz"O;!:rr ~ fii "OmcmQQ 0 Ii> mGiI;U!2~:<:-::"O 52 ~:t5C'l:~ ~ " "O~_i:mz ~ >;niiioQ(IJ G> e8=l~~~ ~ 2!o~::!~~ ~ ;;:E:OO;n~Ul Jl: _~l'm"ili ! ;1J;;::r-~;~ g 8m mm- Q. oP ti!Q~ c of!. ~~ 1Il ~ 3 '" ~ o r ~ ,m I ig r '" ~~,,,,~r ~ J!~ ~ rg-l p ! I 0 I '" ~ ! 0 ~ 1\0,.0 I I, i r '" g ! '" r I '" 0 ~ I , " Q ! I c ;JJ m ~ IA ! L -=~ ------ , Proposed General Plan Lan<!.Y_~~_P~~!2~!!~E~~ I ATTACHMENT NO.2 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 05-_ SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC Staff Report-1.doc 9 CC RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS OF PLANNING AREA 7B FROM OPEN SPACE (OS) TO LOW MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (LM), CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF PLANNING AREA 10 FROM LOW RESIDENTIAL (L) TO LOW-ESTATE RESIDENTIAL (L-E), MODIFY THE FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE BOUNDARY, ADD ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCEESSORY STRUCTURES, AMEND THE DESCRIPTION SUMMARIES OF PLANNING AREAS 1A, 7B, 10, 12, AND 27, REVISE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, AND MAKE OTHER MINOR TEXT CHANGES TO THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0371). WHEREAS, On December 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of Teniecula adopted an approved Planning Application PA94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA99-0298 (General Plan Arnendment), PA94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99- 0299 (Development Agreement), PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661), and PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353); WHEREAS, On May 26, 2004, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Application Nos. PA04- 0371 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on December 15, 2004, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Cornmission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on , 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved the Application, approved a Notice of Determination after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.l\CC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 1 Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findinas. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16.020.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: A. The Specific Plan amendment is consistent with the General Plan. The zone change, design guidelines and development standards are consistent with the related General Plan Amendment for the City of Temecula. The site is physically suitable for the residential uses that will eventually occur in this area. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is consistent with the original adopted and certified EIR (PA94-0076) for the project site. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states than when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Therefore the City Council, pursuant to Section 15162 of CEQA Guidelines finds that no additional environmental review is necessary. Section 4. Specific Plan. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Specific Plan Amendment known as the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment subject to the Conditions of Approval included in Exhibit B and as shown on Exhibit A (the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.1), on property locate near the future intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, subject to that attached Conditions of Approval. Section 5. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves the Applications for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit B, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] R:\S P A\2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Dratt Resolution.doc 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 05-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2005, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 3 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN ADDENDUM R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 4 EXHIBIT B DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 5 EXHIBIT B CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0371 Project Description: An Amendment to the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan DIF: Per Development Agreement TUMF: MSHCP: Per Development Agreement Per Development Agreement Approval Date: December 15, 2004 Expiration Date: December 15, 2007 PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 211 08(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resuiting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 6 3. Approval of this Specific Plan is contingent upon and shall not becorne effective nor shall it vest until a General Plan Amendment (GPA) and Zone Change are approved by the City Council, and a Notice of Determination or any other environrnental review under the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) are approved by the City Council. 4. The approval granted by this Resolution shall become effective upon the Effective Date of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, as the term Effective Date is defined in the First Amendment of the Development Agreement adopted concurrently with this Resolution. In addition to the foregoing, in the event an amended Development Agreement is entered into that supercedes or alters these conditions of approval and the applicant causes a default or terminates by conduct the amended Development Agreement, then the City shall immediately consider the revocation of the approval granted by this Resolution. 5. The applicant shall provide within 30 days of approval by the City Council additional and/or replace the residential inspiration photos in the Design Guidelines to reflect a high quality, realistic development, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch.lICC SPA Draft Resolution.doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO.3 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 05-_ SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT R:IS P A\2004104-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-lICC Staff Report.t.doc 12 CC ORDINANCE NO. 05-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0371 (SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT) TO AMEND THE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO INCLUDE A LOW- ESTATE ZONE, AND ADD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, GARAGES AND ENCROACHMENTS INTO YARD AREAS (PA04-0371). WHEREAS, On December 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted an approved Planning Application PA94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99- 0299 (Development Agreement), PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661), and PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353); WHEREAS, On May 26, 2004, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Application No. PA04- 0371 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not Iirnited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on December 15, 2004, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council considered the Application on , 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved the Application, approved a Notice of Determination after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Ordinance.doc 1 Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16.020.E of the Temecula Municipal Code: Section 17.16.020.E 1-4 A. The Specific Plan amendment is consistent with the general plan. The zone change, design guidelines, development standards and various clean-up items are consistent with the related General Plan Amendment for the City of Temecula. The site is physically suitable for the residential uses that will eventually occur in this area. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is consistent with the original adopted and certified EIR (PA94-0076) for the project site. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states than when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Therefore the City Council, pursuant to Section 15162 of CEQA Guidelines finds that no additional environmental review is necessary. Section 4. Specific Plan. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves the Specific Plan Amendment known as the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No. 1 as shown on Exhibit A (the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment No.1, Zoning Standards), on property locate near the future intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, subject to that attached Conditions of Approval. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this_ day of_2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-l\CC SPA Draft Ordinance.doc 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ss CITY OF TEMECULA I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2005, by the following vote: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04.0371. Roripaugh Ranch-l\CC SPA Draft Ordinance.doc 3 EXHIBIT A PROPOSED ZONING STANDARDS R:\S P A\2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC SPA Draft Ordinance.doc 4 I' , I: I' I, [: r! [: [ : I : ! : [ : ! : [ : I r I:. , 11 II I [ [ [ 11 u u u SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE OVERVIEW Section V of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the Amended Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. Standards have been added the Low Density Estates (L-E) for Planning Area 10 and allowing single-family detached units in Planning Areas 12, 14 and 15. Table 5.1 (Schedule of Permitted Uses- Residential Districts) has been expanded to include the L-E designation. Table 5.2-1 (Accessory Structures Setbacks) and Table 5.2-2 (Maximum Encroachments into Required Yard Areas) have been added. 5.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT The zoning for the Specific Plan area is Specific Plan Overlay. This section of the Specific Plan establishes zoning districts and land use reguhitions and standards that will control land use and development in the land uses identified for the Specific Plan area. These regulations amend and supersede the regulations ofthe Temecula Development Code. Where standards and regulations are not specified in this Specific Plan, the requirements of the Temecula Development Code shall provide the regulatory authority. This section also identifies the procedures to be used to review site plans for development projects proposed within the Specific Plan area. Special standards for residential development are also included here. The Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines in Section 4.0 are intended to be used in conjunction with the zoning and development standards stated here. The following standards will serve as the primary mechanism for implementation of the land usesfor the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan: These regulations provide an appropriate amount of flexibility to anticipate future needs and to achieve compatibility between land uses. Principal land uses for the Specific Plan shall be as follows: . 1. Residential Land Uses: . Low Density (L) Single-Family Detached: (PA~, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B) . Low Density Estates (L-E) Single-Family Detached (PA10) . Low Medium (LM) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 1A-4B, 16 -18) . Medium (M1) DenSity Single-Family Detached: (PA 23 and 24) . Medium (M2) Density Single-Family Detached aREl '!'!lashed slustered: (PA 12, 14; and 15;- 22 and 31) . . . Medium (M2) Density Attached clustered: (PA 22 and 31) 2. Commercial: . Neighborhood Commercial: (PA 11) 3. Parks and Open Space: . Private Recreation Centers (PA 5, 30) . Private Mini-Park (PA 1 B) . Parks (PA 6, 27) . Open Space . Habitat (051): (PA 8, 9A, 9B, and 13) . Flood Control (OS2): (PA +8, 7C, 25, 26, and portions of 14 and 27) . Landscape Slope (053): (PA 7A and portion of 6) 4. Elementary and Middle School: (PA: 28 and 29) 5. Fire Station: (PA 32) Roripau!:Ih Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 37 December. 2004 I; [ ; SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I; [ : [ [ Ii I: I: ! : 5.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS This section of the development regulations states the general rules that must be observed by all development projects in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare. These regulations apply to all planning areas within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, unless otherwise specified. 1. Roripaugh Ranch Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area is subject to the policy provisions of the Site Planning (Section 4.0) and Architectural Design Guidelines (Section 4.0) adopted by ordinance of the T emecula City Council. The Design Guidelines in conjunction with the development standards contained in this Specific Plan and those of the Temecula Development Code shall regulate development within the Specific Plan area. The Design Guidelines will be administered through the City of Temecula Planning Department. All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall be subject to the Development Standards in this section of the Specific Plan. 2. Code Compliance All construction and development within the RoripaughRanch Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan, the Uniform Building Code and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire codes, water ordinance, grading and excavation codes and subdivision codes, in effect in the City of Temecula at the time grading/building permits are obtained. 3. Setback Requirements I: .' I: [ I U II The setback requirements are as specified within the standards identified in the plan for each zoning district. If not otherwise specified, all setbacks shall be determined as the perpendicular distance from the existing or planned street right-of-way line or property line, to the foundation point of the closest structure. 4. Exceptions If specific development standards have not been established or if an issue, condition or situation arises or occurs that is not clearly understandable in the Specific Plan, then those regulations and standards of the City of Temecula Development Code that are applicable for the most similar use, condition or situation shall apply as determined by the Community Development Director. 5. Enforcement Enforcement of the provisions herein shall be in the manner specified in.the Temecula Municipal Code for zoning enforcement. I [ 6. Unspecified Uses Ii Whenever a use has not specifically been listed as being a permitted use in a particular zone classification within the Specific Plan, it shall be the duty ofthe Planning Director to determine if said use is: (1) consistent with the intent of the zone; and (2) compatible with other listed permitted uses. Any person aggrieved by the decision may appeal to the Planning Commission. u I r ! l J [I 38 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 I . ! , , SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE f' i, I; f) I: 5.3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides a mix of diverse housing products, including five different housing types that fall within three of the City's General Plan residential designations: [ ; [ ; [ : I; L Specific Plan Desianation Temecula General Plan Residential Desianation L (20,000 sq. ft.) Single-Family (1-2 du/ac) Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 dulac) . L-E (10,000 sq. ft.) Single-Family (1-2 duJac) LM (5,000 and 6,000) Single-Family (2-5 du/ac) (Min. 5,000 sf lot size) Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 dulac) Low Medium Density Residential Single-Family (3-6 dulac) 1 I. M1 and M2 (4,000 and NA) Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) M1: Min. (standard) 4,000 sf lot size M2: Min. (clustered) 3,999 sf lot size fer E1etasheEl M2: Min. (attached) 3,000 sf lot size Medium Density Residential Single-Family (7-12 dulac) I' I. L [; L I r Ii I [ II IT It II I r I: l; ! 7 I; U u Roripauj:lh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 39 December, 2004 I' I. SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE r : r 1 I: 5.3.1 DESCRIPTION OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. W,19, 20, 21, 33A AND 338 [ r .. [ : I: [ : I: The Low Density Residential (L) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single- family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical lot sizes in the L zoning district will be a minimum of 20,000 square feet with 1 acre minimum lots along the exterior perimeter of Planning Areas 19, 20,21, and 33A. Private equestrian use will only be allowed on lots one acre or larger adjacent to the multi-use trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, 21. Planning Area 338 shall not be developed as a part of Roripaugh Ranch. This planning area shall eventually be combined with the adjacent residential areas to the north. LOW DENSITY ESTATES RESIDENTIAL (L-E) - PLANNING AREA NO. 10 The Low Density Estates Residential (L-E) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical lot sizes in the L-E zoning district will be a minimum of 10,000 square feet. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (LM) - PLANNING AREAS NOS.1A, 2, 3, 4A, 48,16,17 and 18 ! . I. The Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots of 5,000 square feet to 6,000 square feet. Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, 4A, 48, and 16 shall have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq. ft. Planning Areas 17 and 16 shall have a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq. ft. I: L [ ; MEDIUM DENSITY - STANDARD (M1) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 23 AND 24 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family homes on lots 4,000 minimum square feet. MEDIUM DENSITY - DETACHED OR CLUSTERED (M2) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 12, 14, 15,22 AND 31 ! f Ii The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of detached or clustered single-family development on minimum lot sizes of 3,000 sq. ft. Planning Areas 12, 14 and 15 will be allowed to have the option of clustered or detached units. Planning Areas 22 and 31 shall contain clustered units. [ i u u I r . . Lt I [ J I U [ i J 40 Roripau!1h Ranch Specific Plan. Amendment No.1 December, 2004 SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.2 USE REGULATIONS II [ [ I! The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more ofthe residential zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "p., the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C., the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. [ : [; I [ II r I Table 5.1 , Schedule of Permitted Uses - Residential Districts Description of Use L L-E LM M1 M2 . Single-family detached P P P P p. Single-family attached - - - - p Single-family zero lot fine '. p p - - - Single-family attached greater than two units - - - - - Multiple family - - - - - Manufactured homes P P P P P Mobilehome park - - - - - Faciiities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent P P P P P or neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent - - - - - or neglected children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or P P P P P fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or - - - - - more) Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P P P P P Residential care facilities for the elderly (seven or more) - - - - - Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly - - - - - Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities - - - - - Secondary dwelling units as defined by City Development Code P P P - - Granny Flat P P P - - Family day care homes-small (four or fewer) P P P P p, Family day care homes-large' C C C - - Day care centers C C C - - Bed and breakfast establishments - - - - - Emergency shellers - - - - - 41 !i [ : !: ! . II u I.! , u u Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I I l: Description of Use L L-E LM M1 M2 Transitional housing - - - - - Nonresidential Agricu~urallopen space uses - - - - - Religious institutions' C C C C C . Utility facilities C C C C C Educational institutions - - - - - Public libraries - - .- - - Public museums and art gaileries (not for profit) - - - - - Kennels and catteries - - - - - Non commercial keeping of horses P. P - - - Temporary real estate tract offices P P P P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards - - - - - Parking for commercial uses - - - - - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - - - - - Convalescent facilities - - - - - Go~ Courses - - - - - Home occupations p P P P P Construction Trailers' P P P P P ! ! I. ! . ., r' I. l: [ : I.. f! it 1. A CUP processed for large family day care homes is subject to Hea~h and Safety Code Section 1597.46(a)(3). In accordan~ therewith,.nqtice of the application being filed shall be malted to surrounding property Owners within one hundred feet only and the notice shall indicate that unless a request for a hearing is made by such surrounding property owner or other "affected person". the CUP will Issue within twenty days of the notice. If a hearing Is requested, the planning department shall schedule such hearing within thirty days of the request and the hearing shall be held within thirty days of being scheduled. Allowed only within a single-family residence. . The Planning Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an Administrcltive Development Plan if it Is determined that the construction trailer will not have an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses. The keeping of horses shall ontybe permitted in Planning Areas 19, 20 and 21 on lots abutting the multi-use trail. No more than two (2) horses and one (1) offspring up to six (6) months of age may be kept on each one acre lot. All horses shall be kept in a stalVcoral (12' x 12' for each horse) located a minimum distance of fifty (SO) feet from neighboring dwellings, ten (10) feet from the main dwelling on the lot and ten (10) feet from the side or rear property line. ReligioUs Ins!nullons shall not be permitted in Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A and 48. Planning Areas 12, 14 and 15 will be allowed to have the option of clustered or detached units. Planning Areas 22. and 31 shall contain clustered units. [ I 1) ! 2. 3. 4. [1 5. 6. [! u 1 f f i U u 42 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I: I. ' SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE rOT I : 5.3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r' I I' [ : [ ~ r: [ [ r: I' l. t: f: l; [ 1 U [ [ n [I I t [ In the Low (L), Low Estates (L-E) Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M) Zones are as follows: Table 5.2 Development Standards - Residential Districts Residential Development L L-E LM LM M1 M2 Standards 20,000 10,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Minimum Lot Size in Feetl Planning Area 40,-19, 20, 10 1A, 2, 3, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12, 14, 15, 21,33A 4A, 48 22 and 31 and 338 and 16 Minimum gross lot area (square 20,000 10,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 3,000 feet) 1 acre. 0' Lots in PA 19, 20 and 21 that abut eastern and southern property boundary shall be a minimum of 1 acre. Thirty(30)foot fuel modification zone shall not be included in lot area. Lots along the western perimeter of PA 33A & 338 shall be a minimum of 1 acre. Dwelling units per net acre 1.2 dulac 1.7 dulac 5.2 dulac 4.0 dulac 6.1 dulac 10.1 dulac Mini~~ lot frontage at front 30 ft 25ft. 25ft. 25 ft 25ft NA ora De line Minimum lot frontage for a flag lot 25ft: 20ft. 20ft 20ft 20ft NA at front property line Minimum width at reqUired front 50 ft 40ft. 40ft 40ft 40ft NA vard setback area Minimum lot width 60ft' SOft. 40ft 40ft 40ft 40 ft , The lot width for both 20,000 sq. ft. lots and 1 acre lots shall be substantially the same. Minimum lot depth .90 ft 80ft. 80ft 80 ft 80ft. NA >'., Minimum front yard setback 25ft. 20ft. 10ft 10 ft 10 ft 10ft - Front entry 18ft. 18ft. 18ft. 18 ft 18ft. 18 ft - Side entry garages 10 ft 10 ft. 10 ft 10 ft 10 ft 10 It . Lots abutting Murrieta Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd. and the MWD easement may be reduced by three (3) feet. Millim~m corner side yard 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft 15 ft. 15ft. 15ft. 'se ac Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 43 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 ! , j ;, r' I , , Ii r i [' [ : Ii r' l, , ' 1 i .. I, I' I; I [ , i I.. , , [1 r [ II u. [1 l I I , l SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE . Residential Development L L-E LM LM Ml M2 Standards 20,000 10,000 .5,000 6,000 (Standard) (Clustered) (Minimum Lot Size In Feel) 4,000 . Planning Area 40; 19, 20, 10 1,2,3,4A, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12,14, is, 21,33A 48 and 16 22 and 31 and 338 . "Minimum interior side yard 10ft. 10 ft 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 3ft. setback Minimum rear yard setback 20ft. 20ft 20ft. 20ft. 15ft. . 15ft. front - Setbacks for lots abutting - - 25ft. - - loaded Planning Area 7 A along the garage soutl1ernproperty line shall have a 25' minimum rear yard setback. - Lots abutting Multi-use trail in - - - PA 19, 20 and21. 5ft. rear - Setbacks for lots abutting 50ft Murrieta Hot Springs between . 50ft. loaded Pounoy Rd. and the MWD garage easement may be reduced by staff by three (3) feet Minimum Rear Yard Setbacks- - Deep Recessed Sft Sft Sft 5ft Sft Sft - Rear Access - - 3ft 3ft 3ft 3ft Maximum height 2 stories, 2 stories, 2 stories, 2~ 2 ~ stories, 2 Y, stories, 35 feet 3S feet 35 feet stories, 35 35 feet 35 feet . feet Maximum percentage of lot 50% 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% coyerage Minimum Garage Size (interior 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' space) ... .. Fireplaces may project not more than two (2) feet into the side yard setback provided the width of the fireplace does not exceed eight (8) feet in width. Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 44 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 SECTION V f' I . 5.3.4 SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r r 1 I; The following development standards shall apply to all residential developments in all of the residential districts within the Specific Plan. In the event of a discrepancy or ambiguity of these standards, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to determine the appropriate standard on a case-by-<:ase basis. Table 5.2-1 Accessory Structures Setbacks II Rear II Side Minimum Distance to Rear Minimum Distance to Side Property Line Property Line 1 Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side yard setbacks in Table 17,06.040 setbacks In Table 17.06.040 of the Temecula Development of the Temecula Development. Code Code Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 setbacks in Table. 17.06.040 of the Temecula Development of the Temecula Development Code Code 5 ft. min. but n'o less than 151 ft.from centerline of alley 3ft. I Storage/utility Enclosure Iswlmming pool" Swimming J""'I Equipment Ispa IAntennas Gazebo/garden structure Isolar collector I IDecks II Patio covers 'I measured at vertical supports IRoof deck II Must meet district standards 1. On a corner lo~ accessory structures are not permitted unless otherwise noted above. 2. Accessory structures with walls must be separated from other accessory and primary structures by at least six feet 3. Second units and granny flats that are attached to the main structure shall comply with the setback and yard requirements contained in Table 5.2. 4. Not permitted In the M1 and M2 zones. r: I; [ : I; [ [ [ , I' I. Front Minimum Distance to Front Property Line Not permitted in the actual !.ront yard . Accessory Structure Detached second unie.4 Detached granny flat" Not permitted In the actual front yard Garage 20 ft. 0 in. (Entrance faces street) 10 ft. 0 in. (If Entrance from side not facing front yard) Not permitted L Not permitted Not permitted f' L Not permitted Not permitted Not permitted I r I I j Not permitted in front yard Not permitted 15ft. II ! ) n r I L 5ft. min. I 3ft. 5ft. 3ft. 5ft. 3ft. 3ft. 5ft. 5ft. 3ft. 5ft. 5 ft. (10 ft. if a corner lot) 3ft. 0 in. 3ft. 0 in. 5ft.mln. I /I 5ft.min. 5ft. min. 5ft. min. t Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. Roripau!1h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No~1 45 December, 2004 f I [i fI u [ [ r r [i [ : !: ! : L 1: rr [. ! I II u n u u I r 1.1 u SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.5 YARD ENCROACHMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following development standards shall apply to all residential developments in all of the residential districts within the Specific Plan. In the event of a discrepancy or ambiguity of these standards, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to determine the appropriate standard on a case-by-<:ase basis. Table 5.2-2 Maximum Encroachments into Required Yard Areas I \1 Maximum Encroachments into \ Yard Area Item Front II Rear II Side' I Architectural features (such as wall projections, I 2ft 1\ 2ft 1\ 2ft I eaves, overhangs, extensions, decorative materials and artwork). Awning or canopy (with no vertical supports) 4ft 0 in. 4ftOln. 3ftOin. Awning or canopy (with vertical supports measured 6ftOin. 6ftOin. 3 ft 0 In. at vertical supports). IBalconies or stairways 3ft6in. II 3ft6in. II 3ft. 6 in. I IBay windows 2ft6in. II 2ft6in.. II 2ft6in. I [Chimneys and air conditioning units 2ftOin. II 2ft6in. II 2ft6in. J [porch 6ftOin. II 3ft.O in. II 3ftOin. 1 [Stairway landings II 6ftOin. II 6ftOin. II 3ft 6 in. I 1. Ona corner lo~ projections permitted in a front yard setback also apply to a street side yard. 2. The deck and its railing shall not exceed the building height limit for the applicable zoning district Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 46 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 r I I f' I: ! ' SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PLANNING AREA 11) r-r It 5.4.1 DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL [ ! Neighborhood Commercial (Planning Area No. 11), will indude a variety of different types of land uses. Uses within this planning area include smaller-scale business activities which generally provide retafl andlor convenience services for residents within Roripaugh Ranch. The following are site planning guidelines relating to Planning Area NO.11. 5.4.2 USE REGULATIONS f r Ii [ i The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in the neighborhood commercial zoning disbicl. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated With a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C", the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit . [ , Ii Table 5-3 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Neighborhood Commercial Center (PA-11) Description of Use NC A Adutt business subject to Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code . - Aerobicsldancelgymnasticsljazzercise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq. It P Aerobicsldancelgymnasticsljazzerciselmartial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq. It P Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities - Alcohol and drug treatment (ou1patient) - Alcoholic beverage sales C Ambulance services . - Animal hospitaVshetter - . Antique restoration - Antique sales (Less than 5,000 sq. It) P Apparel and accessory shops P . Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pinball and video games) - Art supply stores P Auction houses - Auditoriums and conference facilities C Automobile dealers (new and used) - Automobile sales (brokerage)- showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display - Automobile repair services - Automobile rental - [ : Ii \ : [ 1 I; II [[ rI [! I. II 1 ' I' j' tJ u 47 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 [! SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE !: - Automobile painting and body shop Automobile service stations with alcoholic sales . Automotive service stations (not selling beer and/or wine) with or without an automated P car wash Automobile parts-sales C Automobile oil changeAube services with no major repair C B Bakery goods distribution . Bakery retail p . Bakery Wholesale - Banks and financial institutions P . . Barber and beauty shops P . Bed and breakfast - Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) P Billiard partor/poolhall - Binding of books and similar publications - Blood bank P Blueprint and duplicating and copy services P Bookstores P Building materials sales (with the exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent of - total sales area) Building materials sales (with the exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent of - total sales area) Butcher shop P C Cabinet shop . - Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq. ft.- no outdoor storage - Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) P Candy/confectionery sales P Car wash, full service/self service - Carpet and rug cleaning - Catering services P Clothing sales P rr I' \. [1 l[ Ii [ ~ Ii I' ; i , . I I L 1I ! 1 [1 r r U ! I 48 RortpauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 f' ! : n [ 1 ]i [ : [ : r: L I' \ l: r: I! I: l f [/ I! n u Ii u , . 1 [ U u SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Coins, purchase and sales p Communications and microwave installations 1 . Communications equipment sales 1 C . C Community care facilities Computer sales and services p Congregate care housing for the elderly 2 C Construction equipment sales, services or rental - Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental - Convenience market - Costume rentals . p Crematoriums . . CuUery p 0 . Data processing equipment and systems - Day care centers p Delicatessen p DiscounVdepartment store p Distribution facility - Drug store/pharmacy p Dry cleaners p Dry cleaning plant . E . Emergency she~er - -:- Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) p Equipment sales and rentais (outdoor storage) - F Feed and grain sales - . Financial, insurance, real estate offices p Fire and police stations p Floor covering sales p Florist shop P Food processing - 49 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 [ \ SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE !: . Fortunetelling, spiriluafism, or similar activity p F reightterminals - Fuel storage and distribution - Funeral parlors, mortuary - . . Furn~ure sales (Less than 10,000 sq. Il) p Furniture transfer and storage - G Garden supplies and equipment sales and service - Gas distribution, meter and control station - General merchandise/retail stores less than 10,000 sq. Il p Glass and mirrors, retail sales p Government offices p Grocery store, retail p Grocery store, wholesale - Guns and firearm sales . - H Hardware stores p Health and exercise club p Health food store p Hea~h care facility p Heliport - Hobby supply shop p Home and business maintenance service - Hospitals - Hotels/motels - I Ice cream parlor p Impound yard - Interior decorating service P J Junk or salvage yard I - \l n 11 u [! !: l: 11 u [! !I !I u l r i i U u so Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 f; , , r! SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE [1 K Kennel - l laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers - laundromat p laundry service (commercial) - Libraries, museums, and galleries (private) C Liquid petroleum, sales and distribution - Liquor stores C Lithographic service . - locksmith . P M Machine shop - Machinery storage yard - Mail order business P Manufacturing of products similar to, but not lim~ed to the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods, within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, c1othing,labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do nor involve frequent truck traffic. Compounding of materials, processing, assembling, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky - ~ems. Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or sem~refined products requiring further processing and manufacturing, and outside storage. Uses under 20,000 sq. ft. with no outside storage Massage 3 P Medical equipment sales/rental P Membership clubs, organizations, lodges . C Min~storage or mini-warehouse facilities - Mobilehome sales and services - Motion picture studio - Motorcycle sales and service - Movie theaters C '--r \ [ [ i [ ~ [ ; L [ t. I' [' .' l; 1 ; Il 11 II [ ! i , , 1 I 51 Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December I 2004 [ I~ SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE [I . . Musical and recording studio - N Nightclubsltaverns/barsldance clublleen club - Nurseries (retail) - Nursing homes/convalescent homes C 0 Office equipment supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq. ft. - Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq. ft., but not lim~ed to, business law, P medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, arcMectural, engineering, real estate, insurance p . Paint and wallpaper stores P Parcel delivery services - Parking lots and parking structures C Pawnshop . - Personal service shops P - Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop P Photographic studio P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) " - Postal distribution - Postal services P Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc.,) - Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved - R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices - Radioltelevision transmitter . - r'l' \ ; 1: [ I [ : [ : r' le: [ : , l ! 1 u [ 1 u !J 1 f II r' I! u I! U 52 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 [: " I] SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE r: Recreational vehicle parks - Recreational vehicle sales - Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed building - Recycilng collection facilities p -c- - Recycling processing facilities . . Religious institution, without a daycare or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a daycare . C Restaurant, drive-in/fast food C Restaurants and other eating establishments p Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment .c Rooming and boarding houses - S Scale, public - Schools, business and professional C Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C . Scientific research and development offices and laboratories - Solid waste disposal facility - Sports and recreational facilities C Swap meet; entirely inside a permanent building - Swap meet, outdoor - Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales p T Tailor shop p Taxi or limousine service - Tire sales - Tobacco shOp p Tool and die casting - Transfer, moving and storage - Transportation terminals and stations C Truck sales/rentals/service - TYNCR repair p S3 n 11 [( [1 [ : r ! ' , u [! [1 [ 1 !I \~ Ii J r I l. [ Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 [ : rr I, SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE [[ U Upholstety shop - V Vending machine sales and services . - W . Warehousing/distribution - Watch repair . p Wedding chapels - Welding shop - Welding supply and service (enclosed) - y Reserved - Z Reserved - [! [I ! : [ ! !: I' L !: 1. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 17.40 of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H of the City of Temecula Development Code. 3. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 5.22 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. [ I P lJ [( [; [! [j ! . . . ,/1 Cj u 54 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 !! SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE ro') I Ii 5.4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS n Ii [! [i u [[ \ - I L I' [! fl 11 [ 1 If Ii lJ Ll l The fOllowing standards of development shall apply in the Neighborhood Commercial: Table 54 Development Standards - Neighborhood Commercial (Commercial Uses - PA 11) Minimum gross area for site 2 acres for common lot centers, 30,000 squafe feet for single lots Target floor area ratio .3 Maximum floor area ratio with intensity bonus as per Section 17.08.050 .50 Front yard adjacent to street - Butterfield Stage. RoadlMurrieta Hot Springs Road 20 feet structure & parking - "A- and -B" Street 20 feet, structure & parking Yard adjacent to residentially zoned property 25 feet, structure & parking Accessol}' structure side/rear yard setback . 10 feet Minimum building separation: - One stOI}': 10 feet - Two stories: 15 feet w Three stories or more: 20 feet Maximum building height 50 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 30% Minimum required landscaped open space 20% Fence, wall or hedge screening outdoor storage maximum height 6 feet Minimum building setiback separation: - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stories or more: . 20 feet 55 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 fi I; 11 I; \: [l IUl [ 1 Ii L r' I I [; L Ii r 1 I 1 I I l I L I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE (Planning Areas Nos.1B, 5, 6, 7A,+B; 7C,8, 9A, 9B, 13,27, 25, 26 and 30) 5.5.1 DESCRIPTION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Parks (P) and Open Space (OS) zoning district is intended to promote a wide range of public and private recreational uses in the community. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public parks and recreation areas, sports parks, or other outdoor athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreational uses. 5.5.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the park and open space zoning district as indicated in the columns corresponding to each zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P', the use shall be a permitted use. Where indicated with a "-", the Use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C', the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. ~ Table 5-5 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Parks and Recreational Uses Schedule of Uses P P OS, OS. OS, (Private) (Public) Planning Area 1B,5 6 and 27 8,9A, +B; 7C, Portions and 30 9B,and 25 and of 6 and 13, 26 7A Agricu~ural Uses - - - - - Athletic Field . P P - - - Bicycle paths . P P - P P Campground - - - - - Caretakers quarters - - - - - Cemeteries, mausoleums and related uses - - - - - . Game courts, badminton, tennis, racquetiball P P - - - Goff driving range not part of a goff course - - - - - Golf course and clubhouse P P - - - Government and pUblic utility facilities C C P P - Gymnasium P P - - - Microwave antennaltower' - - - - - 'Nature centers/exhibits - - - - - Nurseries - - - - - Group Picnic Facilities P P - - - Roripau.Qh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 56 December, 2004 r I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE [OJ !l If !; [ [ Private parks and recreation facilities P P - P P Parking areas P P - - - Public parks and recreational facilities P P - P P Recreational vehicle park - - - - - Riding stable, public or private - - - - - Shooting galleries, ranges, archeI}' courses - - - - - Single-family dwellings - - - - - Tree Farms - - - - - Ii 1 : [' I 1. See Zoning Appendix of Development Code 17.40 for antenna information_ r I [ . j Ii L P Ii r I Ii Ii ! , I r l. j I r 1 I' \ " t ~ I: L1 I! -. 57 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 ! I [' I: SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS [[ [ 1 In the Parks and Open Space districts development standards are as follows: r ! [: Table ~ Development Standards - Parks and Open Space Standards Development Standards P OS Planning Area 1B, 5, 6, 27 and 7 A, 7B;- 7C, 8, 31 9A, 9B, 13, 25 alld26 Minimum lot size 10,000 sq. ft. - Maximum lot coverage 25% - Maximum height 35 feet' - Floor area ratio _1 - Setback for parking areas and structure!> 25 feet - Minimum open spacellandscaping 75% . 100% r ! l1 [ [ !: [; l: 1. Excludes light poles and communication facillties. [ 1 f f II II !1 11 f r Ii L I' l i r! ; i tk u 58 RoriP8Ugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 [ r; r-I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE . 5.6 PUBUCnNSmUTlONAL DISTRICTS (PLANNING AREAS 28 AND 29) 5.6.1 DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT AND PUBUC INSmUTlONAL DISTRICT [-I The purpose of this district is to facilitate the construction of an Elementary School site and Middle School site. Planning Afea 28 will be developed as a Middle School site and Planning Area 29 will be developed as an Elementary School site. 5.6.2 USE REGULATIONS [ [ Planning Areas 28 and 29 shall only be designated to be used as a Middle School site and an Elementary School site, fespectively. I [ I: L I' ! . [ - ..' 11 If I! [ ! ! [ I! II I' 1 i d lJ 59 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 [- ri .' Ii f1 SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.7 PUBUC INSmUTlONAL (PLANNING AREA 32) 5.7.1 DESCRIPTION OF PUBUC INSTITUTIONAL (FIRE STATION) The purpose of this district is to facilitate construction of public and quasi-public uses in appropriate areas of the city. Planning Area 32 will be developed as a fife station on a 1.S-acre site. 5.7.2 USE REGULATIONS [ ! Planning Area 32 shall only be designated as a Fire Station. Ii [f Ii ! : I., I: r r II !l I [ u II . f II I r . I li u Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 60 December, 2004 I-! p Ii SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE . 5.8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS Refer to Chapter 17.24 of the City Development Code for parking fequirements. !I [ [ !i n I; !: I; L II [1 u n r r . l; f r , . U l' .I 61 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December I 2004 ATTACHMENT NO.4 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO 05-_ TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-lICC Staff Report-1.doc 14 CC RESOLUTION NO. 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA04- 0369 (TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32004) TO CREATE 6 ADDITIONAL LOTS AND MODIFY THE CONFIGURATION OF A TOTAL OF 18 LOTS IN PLANING AREA 1A TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXTENSION OF A CUL-DE-SAC, LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF MURRIETA HOT SPRINGS ROAD AND POURROY ROAD (PA04-0369). WHEREAS, On December 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted an approved Planning Application PA94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99- 0299 (Development Agreement), PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661), and PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353); WHEREAS, Ashby USA, LLC filed Planning Application Nos. PA04-0369 (the "Application"), in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan, Development Code, CEQA Guidelines and California State CEQA Guidelines; WHEREAS, the Application was processed including, but not limited to public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Application on December 15, 2004, at duly noticed public hearings as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Commission hearings and after due consideration of the testimony, the Commission recommended approval of the Application subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder; WHEREAS, the City Council cons ide fed the Application on , 2005, at a duly noticed public hearing as pfescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to, and did testify either in support or opposition to this matter; WHEREAS, at the conclusion of the Council hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Council approved the Application, and approved a Notice of Determination, made all required findings and determinations relative thereto after finding that the project proposed in the Application conformed to the City of Temecula General Plan as amended; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and are hereby incorporated by reference. Section 2. Findings. That the City Council, in approving the Application, hereby makes the following findings as required in Chapter 17.16 of the Temecula Municipal Code: R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Dratt Resolution.doc 1 A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 32004 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, Municipal Code and the related General Plan Amendment because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the policies and standards in the General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, Municipal Code and related General Plan Amendment. B. The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map. The project consists of an 18-lot Tentative Tract Map on property designated for residential uses, which is consistent with the related General Plan Amendment, as well as, the development standards of the Specific Plan. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project site does not currently include a creek, wetlands, or habitat subject to environmental review. The project site has been disturbed and is not considered to contain critical habitat. The project consists of a Tract Map on property designated for residential uses, which is consistent with the related General Plan Amendment, as well as the development standards of the Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed subject to CEQA and has been determined to be exempt subject to CEQA Section 15162. An EIR has been prepared, adopted and certified for the project site and the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the project description of the certified EIR. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Division and the Building Safety Division. As a result, the project will be conditioned to address their concerns. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan, Development Code and Specific Plan to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded. The project is consistent with these documents. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of any structures the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC TPM Dratt Resolution.doc 2 Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Tract Map. The Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. H. (Quimby). The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements The proposed project is within an approved specific plan area. The specific plan was designed and analyzed for a maximum of 2,015 residential units and parkland has been dedicated using this number. The proposed project will not exceed the maximum number of units in the specific plan area and is therefore consistent with Quimby. Section 3. Environmental Compliance. The proposed project is consistent with the original adopted and certified EIR (PA94-0076) for the project site. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 states than when an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) has been certified for a project, no subsequent EIR shall be prepared for that project unless there are substantial changes not discussed or examined in the EIR. Therefore the City Council, pursuant to Section 15162 of CEQA Guidelines finds that no additional environmental review is necessary. Section 4. Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves PA04-0369, Tentative Tract Map 32004 to create an additional 6 lots and modify a total of 18 lots in Planning Area 1 A, on property located near the future intersection of Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Pourroy Road. Section 5. Conditions. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves the Applications for all of the foregoing reasons and subject to the project specific conditions set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference together with any and all other necessary conditions that may be deemed necessary. Section 6. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _-2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk [SEAL] R:IS P A\2004104-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-llCC TPM Dratt Resolution.doc 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that Resolution No. 2005-_ was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of 2005, by the following vote: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCILMEMBERS: AYES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: Susan W. Jones, CMC/AAE City Clerk R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 4 EXHIBIT A DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32004 R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 5 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA04-0369 Project Description: A Tentative Tract Map (TIM 32004) to subdivide 2.0 acres into 6 new parcels and modify a total of 18 lots in Planning Area 1A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. DIF: Per Development Agreement TUMF: Per Development Agreement MSHCP: Per Development Agreement Approval Date: ,2005 ,2008 Expiration Date: PLANNING DIVISION Within Forty-Eight (48) Hours of the Approval of this Project 1. The applicanVdeveloper shall deliver to the Planning Department a cashier's check or money order made payable to the County Clerk in the amount of Sixty-four Dollars ($64.00) for the County administrative fee, to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination as provided under Public Resources Code Section 21108(b) and California Code of Regulations Section 15062. If within said forty-eight (48) hour period the applicanVdeveloper has not delivered to the Planning Department the check as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void by reason of failure of condition (Fish and Game Code Section 711.4(c)). General Requirements 2. The applicant and owner of the real property subject to this condition shall hereby agree to indemnify, protect, hold harmless, and defend the City with Legal Counsel of the City's own selection from any and all claims, actions, awards, judgments, or proceedings against the City to attack, set aside, annul, or seek monetary damages resulting, directly or indirectly, from any action in furtherance of and the approval of the City, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, advisory agency, appeal board or legislative body including actions approved by the voters of the City, concerning the Planning Application. The City shall be deemed for purposes of this condition, to include any agency or instrumentality thereof, or any of its elected or appointed officials, officers, employees, consultants, contractors, legal counsel, and agents. City shall promptly notify both the applicant and landowner of any claim, action, or proceeding to which this condition is applicable and shall further cooperate fully in the defense of the action. The R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 6 City reserves the right to take any and all action the City deems to be in the best interest of the City and its citizens in regards to such defense. 3. The tentative subdivision shall comply with the State of California Subdivision Map Act and to all the requifements of Ordinance No. 460, unless modified by the conditions listed below. A time extension may be approved in accordance with the State Map Act and City Ordinance, upon written request, if made 60 days prior to the expiration date. 4. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, and the approved Mitigation Monitoring Program thereof. 5. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to the Roripaugh Ranch Development Agreement (PA99-0299) and any subsequent Amendments to the Development Agreement (PA04-0590). 6. The Nature Walk shall include enhanced landscaping adjacent to lot 19 to screen the Nature Walk from the Nicolas Valley, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. 7. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Planning Director. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Planning Director shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. . 8. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Roripaugh Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94-0075) as approved on November 26, 2002. 9. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29353(PA01-0230) as approved on November 26,2002. 10. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 (PA01-0253) as approved on November 26, 2002. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 11. A copy of the Rough Grading plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Department. 12. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in that ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 13. Prior to the City approval of the grading plans or any other plans requiring MWD clearance that may impact their property and easement; the developer is responsible to provide the City with MWD's clearance for the said plans. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 14. The fOllowing shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning Department: R:\S P AI2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 7 a. A copy of the Final Map. b. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) with the following notes: i. This property is located within thirty (30) miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute oj Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. ii. The Roripaugh Ranch Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Community Development Department - Planning Division. iii. An EIR was prepared for the Roripaugh Ranch Specijic Plan and is on jile at the City of Temecula Planning Department. iv. Lot 19 shall be designated as permanent open space. c. An Owners Association shall be established and the applicant shall submit a copy oj the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&R's) that address the following: i. CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director. The CC&R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings and all landscaped and open areas including parkways. ii. No lot or unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been fOfmed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iii. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually agreeable features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recofded CC&R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&R's shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 8 The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the city prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. iv. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. v. The CC&Rs shall include 19 as a common area to be maintained by the Homeowners Association. 15. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the precise location of paseos shall be determined consistent with the Specific Plan requirements. 16. Prior to the City approval of the improvement plans, the final map, or any other plans requiring MWD clearance that may impact their property and easement, the developer is responsible to provide the City with MWD's clearance for the said plans. 17. Prior to approval of the Final Map, the landscape plans for the parkways, medians, and slope and fuel modification areas directly adjacent to roadways shall be submitted and approved. Prior to Issuance of a Building Permit 18. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a product review and/or a product placement application for all development within Tract Map 32004. 19. As required, three (3) copies of construction landscape plans that include irrigation, hardscaping, the location, number, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be submitted and be accompanied by the fOllowing items: a. Appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal). b. One (1) copy of the approved grading plan. c. Water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance). d. Complete screening of all ground-mounted equipment from the view of the public from streets and adjacent property. 20. Prior to issuance of any residential building permits all walls and fence plans other than the privacy fences for individual residential lots shall be submitted and approved. 21. Prior to issuance of any residential building permits typical front yard landscaping and construction landscape plans for Model Home Complexes for each phase of development shall be submitted and approved. 22. The applicant shall file and receive approval of a Development Plan for all the residential products. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc . 9 23. All components of the project shall be completed as identified in the Specific Plan or the Conditions of Approval. 24. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Planning, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings within private common areas for a period of one year, in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Community Development Department - Planning Division for one year from the completion of the landscaping. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Planning, the bond shall be released. 25. Privacy Wall and Fence Plans for individuai lots in each phase of development consistent with the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. 26. Precise Grading Plans consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements shall be submitted and approved. 27. Roof-mounted mechanical equipment shall not be permitted within the subdivision; however solar equipment or any other energy saving devices shall be permitted with Planning Director approval. 28. Lots 4 through 14 of Tract Map 32004 shall have a minimum rear yard setback of 25'. Prior to Issuance of Occupancy Permits 29. If deemed necessary by the Director of Planning, the applicant shall provide additional landscaping to effectively screen various components of the project. 30. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall be installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Planning. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properiy constructed and in good working order. 31. Front yard and slope landscaping within individual lots shall be completed for inspection prior to issuance of each occupancy permit (excluding model home complex structures). 32. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this permit. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT The Department of Public Works recommends the following Conditions of Approval for this project. Unless stated otherwise, all conditions shall be completed by the Developer at no cost to any Govemment Agency. General Requirements 33. It is understood that the Developer correctly shows on the tentative map all existing and proposed easements, traveled ways, improvement constraints and drainage courses, and their omission may require the project to be resubmitted for further review and revision. R:\S P A\2004\04-037l, Roripaugh Ranch-l\CC TPM Draft Resoiution.doc 10 34. A Grading Permit for either rough or precise grading shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction outside of the City-maintained road right-of-way. 35. An Encroachment Permit shall be obtained from the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within an existing or proposed City right-of-way. 36. All improvement and grading plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site and shall be submitted on standard 24" x 36" City of Temecula mylars. 37. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Roripaugh Specific Plan No. 11 (PA94-0075) as approved on November 26, 2002. 38. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29353(PA01-0230) as approved on November 26,2002. 39. The Applicant shall comply with all underlying Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 29661 (PA01-0253) as approved on November 26, 2002. Prior to Approval of the Final Tract Map, unless other timing is indicated, the Developer shall complete the following or have plans submitted and approved, subdivision improvement agreements executed and securities posted: 40. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. City of Temecula Fire Prevention Bureau d. Planning Department e. Department of Public Works f. Community Services District 41. The Developer shall design and guarantee construction of the following public improvements to City of Temecula General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Department of Public Works: a. Improve private street, Skyline Drive, (Specific Plan Private Street Standards - 47' R1E with 4.5-foot wide public utility easements on both sides of street beyond road easement or a approved by the Director of Public Works) to include installation of full-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, street lights, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. All street improvement design shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans standards for transition to existing street sections. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-lICC TPM Dratt Resolution.doc 11 42. Unless otherwise approved the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of the street improvement plans: a. Street centerline grades shall be 0.5% minimum over P .C.C. and 1.00% minimum over A.C. paving. b. Driveways shall conform to the applicable City Standard No. 207, 207A, and/or 208. c. Street lights shall be installed along the public streets shall be designed in accordance with City Standard No. 800. d. Concrete sidewalks shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard Nos. 400. e. Design of street improvements shall extend a minimum of 300 feet beyond the project boundaries to ensure adequate continuity of design with adjoining properties. f. Minimum centerline radii shall be in accordance with City Standard No. 113. g. All reverse curves shall include a 100-foot minimum tangent section. h. All street and driveway centerline intersections shall be at 90 degrees. i. All knuckles shall be constructed in accordance with City Standard No. 602. j. All cul-de-sac shall be constructed in accordance in City Standard No. 600. k. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18 feet in depth from back of sidewalk. I. Landscaping shall be limited in the corner cut-off area of all intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minirnum sight distance and visibility. rn. All utility systerns including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided underground. Easements shall be provided as required where adequate right-of-way does not exist for installation of the facilities. All utilities shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. n. All utilities, except electrical lines rated 33kv or gfeater, shall be installed underground. 43. A construction area Traffic Control Plan shall be designed by a registered Civil Engineer and reviewed by the Department of Public Works for any street closure and detour or other disruption to traffic circulation as required by the Department of Public Works. 44. Corner property line cut off for vehicular sight distance and installation of pedestrian facilities shall be provided at all street intersections in accordance with Riverside County Standard No. 805. 45. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encurnbrances as approved by the Department of Public Works. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 12 46. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision which is part of an existing Assessment District must comply with the requirements of said section. Prior to City Council appfoval of the Parcel Map\Final Map, the Developer shall make an application for reapportionment of any assessments with appropriate regulatory agency. 47. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 48. An Environmental Constraints Sheet (ECS) shall be prepared in conjunction with the Final Map to delineate identified environmental concerns and shall be recorded with the map. 49. The Developer shall comply with all constraints which may be shown upon an Environmental Constraint Sheet recorded with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 50. The Developer shall make a good faith effort to acquire the required off-site property interests, and if he Of she should fail to do so, the Developer shall, prior to submittal of the Final Map for recordation, enter into an agreement to complete the improvements pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462 and Section 66462.5. Such agreement shall provide for payment by the Developer of all costs incurred by the City to acquire the off-site property interests required in connection with the subdivision. Security of a portion of these costs shall be in the form of a cash deposit in the amount given in an appraisal report obtained by the Developer, at the Developer's cost. The appraiser shall have been approved by the City prior to commencement of the appraisal. 51. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer, and cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. 52. The Developer shall notify the City's cable TV Franchises of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV Standards at time of street improvements. 53. Private drainage easements for cross-lot drainage shall be required and shall be delineated and noted on the final map. 54. An easement for a joint use driveway shall be provided prior to approval of the Final Map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first. 55. Easements, when required for roadway slopes, landscape easements, drainage facilities, utilities, etc., shall be shown on the final map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded as directed by the Department of Public Works. On-site drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the final map. A note shall be added to the final map stating "drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." R:\S P AI2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 13 Prior to Issuance of Grading Permits 56. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Planning Department b. Department of Public Works c. Community Services District 57. A Rough Grading Plan shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer in accordance with City of Temecula standards and approved by the Department of Public Works prior to commencement of any grading. The plan shall incorporate adequate erosion control measures to protect the site and adjoining properties from damage due to erosion. 58. A Soils Report shall be prepared by a registered Civil or Soils Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The report shall address all soils conditions of the site, and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structufes and preliminary pavement sections. 59. A Geotechnical Report shall be prepared by a registered engineer or engineering geologist and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initiai grading plan check. The report shall address special study zones and identify any geotechnical hazards for the site including location of faults and potential for liquefaction. The report shall include recommendations to mitigate the impact of ground shaking and liquefaction. 60. A Drainage Study shall be prepared by a registered Civil Engineer and submitted to the Department of Public Works with the initial grading plan check. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities expected from the development of this site and upstream of the site. 11 shall identify all existing or proposed off-site or on-site, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. The basis for analysis and design shall be a storm with a recurrence interval of one hundred years. 61. NPDES - The project proponent shall implement construction-phase and post- construction pollution prevention measures consistent with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and City of Temecula (City) NPDES programs. Construction- phase measures shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) consistent with the City's Grading, Erosion & Sediment Control Ordinance, the City's standard notes for Erosion and Sediment Control, and the SWRCB General Permit for Construction Activities. Post-construction measures shall be required of all Priority Development Projects as listed in the City's NPDES permit. Priority Development Pfojects will include a combination of structural and non-structural onsite source and treatment contfol BMPs to prevent contaminants from commingling with stormwater and treat all unfiltered runoff year-round prior to entering a storm drain. Construction-phase and post-construction BMPs shall be designed and included into plans for submittal to, and subject to the approval of, the City Engineer prior to issuance of a Grading Permit. The project R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 14 proponent shall also provide proof of a mechanism to ensure ongoing long-term maintenance of all structural post-construction BMPs. 62. The Developer shall post security and enter into an agreement guaranteeing the grading and erosion control improvements in conformance with applicable City Standards and subject to approval by the Department of Public Works. 63. A flood mitigation charge shall be paid. The Area Drainage Plan fee is payable to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District by either cashier's check or money order, prior to issuance of permits, based on the prevailing area drainage pian fee. If the full Area Drainage Plan fee or mitigation charge has already been credited to this property, no new charge needs to be paid. 64. The Developer shall obtain letters of approval or easements for any off-site work performed on adjoining properties. The letters or easements shail be in a format as directed by the Department of Public Works. 65. All lot drainage shall be directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. Prior to Issuance of Building Permits 66. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, Final Map 32004 shall be approved and recorded. 67. The Deveioper shall vacate and dedicate the abutters rights of access along Skyline Drive pursuant to the new location of the driveway. 68. A Precise Grading Plan shall be submitted to the Department of Public Works for review and approval. The building pad shall be certified by a registered Civil Engineer for iocation and elevation, and the Soils Engineer shall issue a Final Soils Report addressing compaction and site conditions. 69. Grading of the subject property shall be in accordance with the California Building Code, the approved grading plan, the conditions of the grading permit, City Grading Standards and accepted grading construction practices. The final grading plan shall be in substantiai conformance with the approved fough grading plan. 70. The Developer shall pay to the City the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resoiutions implementing Chapter 15.06. 71. The Developer shall pay to the City the Western Riverside County Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program as required by, and in accordance with, Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all Resolutions implementing Chapter 15.08. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy 72. As deemed necessary by the Department of Public Works, the Developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: R:\S P A\2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 15 a. Rancho California Water District b. Eastern Municipal Water District c. Department of Public Works 73. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by the Department of Public Works. 74. All improvements shall be constructed and completed per the approved plans and City standards to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. 75. The existing improvements shall be reviewed. Any appurtenance damaged or broken due to the construction operations of this project shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. FIRE DEPARTMENT The fOllowing are the Fire Department Conditions of Approval for this project. All questions regarding the meaning of these conditions shall be referred to the Fire Prevention Bureau. 76. Any previous existing conditions for this project or any underlying map will remain in full fOfce and effect unless superceded by more stringent requirements here. 77. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 78. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for residential land division per CFC Appendix III.A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 1500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 2-hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 79. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III.B, Table A-III-B-1. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 500 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 80. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for commercial land division per CFC Appendix III-A, Table A-III-A-1. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 4000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure with a 4 hour duration. The required fire flow may be adjusted during the approval process to reflect changes in design, construction type, or automatic fire A:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 16 protection measures as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. The Fire Flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC 903.2, Appendix III-A) 81. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix III-B, Table A-III-B-1. Super fire hydrants (6" x 4" x 2-2 1/2" outlets) shall be located on Fire Department access roads and adjacent public streets. Hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, at each intersection and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required. (CFC 903.2, 903.4.2, and Appendix III-B) 82. All traffic calming devices that could impede or slow emergency vehicle access are prohibited, except those expressly approved by the fire prevention bureau individually on a case by case basis when they maintain the required travel widths and radii. 83. Cul-de-sacs and/or intersections with planters must maintain 24 foot clear unobstructed travel width around the planters, not including parking. Hardscape areas are permissible provided that they meet the 80,000 lb. ioad requirements and are at road level. 84. Private entry driveways with divider medians must be a minimum of 16 feet wide on each side unless the median is held back 30 feet from face of curb of perpendicular road. 85. If construction is phased, each phase shall provide approved access and fire protection prior to any building construction. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2) This will include all internal roads, connecting roads between phases, and construction gates. All required access must be in and available prior to and during ALL construction. Phasing is approved on a separate map, and is ultimately subject to final approval in the field. 86. Prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved temporary Fire Department vehicle access roads for use until permanent roads are installed. Temporary Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface for 80,000 Ibs. GVW. (CFC 8704.2 and 902.2.2.2) 87. Prior to building final, all locations where structures are to be built shall have approved Fire Department vehicle access roads to within 150 feet to any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of the building(s). Fire Department access roads shall be an all weather surface designed for 80,000 Ibs. GVW with a minimum AC thickness of .25 feet. (CFC sec 902) 88. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than twenty-four (24) feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not iess than thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches. (CFC 902.2.2.1) 89. Prior to building construction, dead end road ways and streets in excess of one hundred and fifty (150) feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus. (CFC 902.2.2.4) R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 17 90. Prior to building construction, this development and any street within serving more than 35 homes or any commercial developments shall have two (2) points of access, via all- weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau. (CFC 902.2.1) 91. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer shall furnish one copy of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation. Plans shall be: signed by a registered civil engineer; contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block; and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. After the plans are signed by the local water company, the originals shall be presented to the Fire Prevention Bureau for signatures. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building materials being placed on an individual lot. (CFC 8704.3, 901.2.2.2 and National Fire Protection Association 24 1-4.1) 92. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy or building final, "Blue Reflective Markers" shall be installed to identify fire hydrant locations. (CFC 901.4.3) 93. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel. (CFC 902.4) Special Conditions 94. Prior to map recordation the applicant shall submit to the Fire Prevention Bureau a georectified (pursuant to Riverside County standards) digital version of the map including parcel and street centerline information. The electronic file will be provided in a ESRI Arclnfo/ArcView compatible format and projected in a State Plane NAD 83 (California Zone VI ) coordinate system. The Bureau must accept the data as to completeness, accuracy and format prior to satisfaction of this condition. COMMUNTIY SERVICES DEPARTMENT General Requirements 95. All landscape areas, open space, trails, signage, fences, walls and private gated areas shall be maintained by the HOA, private maintenance association or property owner. 96. Lot 19 shall be owned and maintained by the Homeowner's Association (HOA). 97. The developer is entitled to receive a credit against the park and recfeation component of the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) pursuant to the Development Agreement. 98. All residential street lighting will be maintained by the Home Owner's Association (HOA). 99. The developer shall contact the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of the construction debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul construction debris: Prior to Approval of the Final Map: 100. A public access and trail easement on Lot 19 shall be dedicated and reserved to themselves. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-lICC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 18 Prior to Issuance of Building Permits: 101. The developer shall provide TCSD verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction debris. 102. The private mini-park (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 6) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 100'h overall residential building permit in all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. 103. The park portion of the private recreation center (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 523) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 250\h overall residential building permit in all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. 104. The building and the pool portion of the private recreation center (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 523) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 350'h overall residential building permit in all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. 105. The 5.1 acre neighborhood park (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 518) shall be improved, including the completion of the 90-day maintenance period, and the conveyance accepted by the City Council prior to the issuance of the 400'h overall residential building permit for all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. 106. The pas eo (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 519) and the trail connecting Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 519 and Lot 518 (Neighborhood Park) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 400'h overall residential building permit in all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. 107. The "Nature Walk" and adjacent landscape areas (Tract Map No. 29661 Lot 520) shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director prior to the issuance of the 400'h overall residential building permit in all Tracts of 29661 and 32004. Prior to Issuance of Certificates of Occupancy: 108. Prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy within each phase map, the developer shall submit the most current list of Assessor's Parcel Numbers assigned to the final project. 109. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide wfitten disclosure of the existence of TCSD and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. OUTSIDE AGENCIES 110. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 10, 2004 from the Rancho California Water District. 111. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 10, 2004 from the Department of Environmental Health. 112. The applicant shall comply with the attached letter dated June 22, 2004 from the United Stated Department of the Army Corps of Engineers. R:\S P A\2004\04.0371, Roripaugh Ranch.1\CC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 19 By placing my signature below, I confirm that I have read, understand and accept all the above Conditions of Approval. I further understand that the property shall be maintained in conformance with these conditions of approval and that any changes I may wish to make to the project shall be subject to Community Development Department approval. Applicant's Signature Date Applicant's Printed Name R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-llCC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 20 EXHIBIT B TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 32004 (UNDER SEPARATE COVER) R:IS P AI2004104-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-llCC TPM Draft Resolution.doc 21 ~5~ ~~~~.~.~.~~..,,-~ i " n ',mm [ill'::'.':: 'I i ' '.,.,.1 iPli!I!~ ~~l: I. illl!!I'! , I[ , Ii i I ! II II ~ II . I'! .!I . ~ \ mmmlllnlll1l1 Ill!!!!llll!!!! i.!! ~ . ~ . ~~ o . ~ t -; ~~> \ '~ .' III > ,I I;~~. l!i~)!~ Il~ ~:-l~ h~$J Ihl1i~ hU~H ah~)>.l !In \J\ {\ ~ U~ tij-t ~ IP(\~. ~~n~H tH (\ III ~ ~H~~I W:~> ~IJ -t.\ "a .' ll!i I li!p II ~ I m~ D1! II ,.,li)lIII 'i ~i CO!!... ~ ~ ll;:t l\1IIl ~. ". "'1 "I ;"11111I1 ." [ill1ll8 i ~ !',:a= l ~l 8~~tA ~ ..... ~ J t il) I~ .=: ." :m ~~ ATTACHMENT NO.5 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO 05-_ FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC Staff Report-1.doc 16 CC ORDINANCE NO. OS-_ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA, LLC FOR THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN (PA04-0590) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. declare that: A. On December 17, 2002, the City Council of the City of Temecula adopted an approved Planning Application PA94-0076 (Environmental Impact Report), PA99-0298 (General Plan Amendment), PA94-0073 (Annexation), PA94-0075 (Specific Plan, Development Code Amendment, and Specific Plan Zoning Standards), PA94-0075 (Change of Zone), PA99-0299 (Development Agreement), PA01-0253 (Tentative Tract Map 29661), and PA01-0230 (Tentative Tract Map 29353). The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and B. On May 26, 2004, Ashby USA, LLC filed application No. PA04-0369 (Tentative Tract Map 32004), PA04-0370 (General Plan Amendment), PA04-0371 (Specific Plan Amendment) and on November 30, 2004, Ashby USA, LLC filed application No.PA04-0590 (First Amendment to the Development Agreement), (the "Application") in accordance with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code for land use approvals for a 804.7 acre planned community located in the Northeast portion of the City near the future intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and Nicolas Road, ("Project"). C. Government Code Section 65864 authorizes the City to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to, among other matters: ensure high quality development in accordance with comprehensive plans; provide certainty in the approval of development pfojects so as to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in the cost of housing and othef development to the consumef; provide assurance to the applicants for development projects that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations and subject to conditions of approval, in order to strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the pfivate and public economic costs of development; and provide for economic assistance to Owner for the entitlements authorizing development related improvements. D. On December 15, 2004 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission on these matters. E. Following consideration of the entire record of infofmation received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Development Agreement and the Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2004- _ recommending to the City Council that the First Amendment to the Development Agreement be approved, subject to certain recommended conditions. R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-1\CC DA Amend Draft Ordinance.doc , F. On , 2005 the City Council of the City of Temecula held duly noticed public hearings on the proposed First Amendment to the Development Agreement(s) and the other land use applications for the Project at which time all persons interested in the proposed Development Agreement and the Project had the opportunity and did address the City Council on these matters. Section 2. declafes that: The City Council of the City of Temecula further finds, determines and A. In consideration of the substantial public improvements and benefits to be provided by Ownef and the Project, in furthef consideration of the implementation of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan and in order to strengthen the public financing and planning process and reduce the economic costs of development, by the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, the City intends to give Owner assurance that Owner can proceed with the development of the Project for the Term of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and in accordance with the City's General Plan, ordinances, policies, rules and regulations existing as set forth in the First Amendment to the Development Agreement. In reliance on the City's covenants in the First Amendment to the Development Agreement concerning the development of the Property, Owner has and will in the future incur substantial costs in site preparation and the construction and installation of major infrastructure and facilities in order to make the Project feasible. B. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement and the Existing Project Appfovals, as defined in the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, implement the goals and policies of the City's General Plan, and the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Pian, provide balanced and diversified land uses, and impose appropriate standards and requirements with respect to land development and usage in order to maintain the overall quality of life and the environment within the City. C. The City has engaged in extensive studies and review of the potential impacts of the Project as well as the various potential benefits to the City by the development of the Project and concluded that the Project is in the best interests of and is not detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the City. D. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement is consistent with the City's General Plan, and each Element thereof, and the City's Growth Management Action Plan, and constitutes a present valid exercise of the City's police power. E. The First Amendment to the Development Agreement is being entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Government Code Section 65867. F. All legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Ordinance have occurred. Section 3. The City Council of the City of Temecula hefeby approves an agreement entitled "The First Amendment to the Development Agreement by and Between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC." and authorizes the Mayor to execute said agreement attached hefeto as Attachment A. Section 4. If any sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance is for any reason held to be unconstitutional or otherwise invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-llCC DA Amend Draft Ordinance.doc 2 remaining provisions of this ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this ordinance and each sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that anyone or more sentences, clauses or phrases be declared unconstitutional or othefwise invalid. Section 5. The City Clerk of the City of Temecula shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Ordinance and shall cause the same or a summary thereof to be published and posted in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _ day of _, 2005. Jeff Comerchero, Mayor ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W. Jones, CMC, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 05-_ was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of , 2005 and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted and passed at a regular meeting of the City Council on the _ day of , 2005, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk R:IS P A\2004104-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-llCC DA Amend Draft Ordinance.doc 3 EXHIBIT A DRAFT FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-l\CC DA Amend Draft Ordinance.doc 4 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I: I I Planning Commission Recommendation for Approval Date: 10.30.02 City Council Approval Date: 11.26.02 Final Revisions Completed: 3.25.03 RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN Amendment No.1 City of Temecula 43200 Business Park Drive Temecula, CA 92589-9033 tel. 951.694.6400 fax 951.694.1999 Prepared for: Ashby USA, LLC 470 E. Harrison Street Corona, CA 92879 tel. 951.898.1692 fax 951.898.1693 Prepared by: Matthew Fagan Consulting Services 42011 Avenida Vista Ladera Temecula, CA 92591 tel. 951.699.2338 fax 951.694.4474 matthewfaaan@adelphia.net ~ ~~~~~~ ~ In Association with: By Hirsch & Associates Inc. 2221 E. Winston Rd., Sutte A Anaheim, CA 92806 Phone: 714.776.4340 The Albert Group 3635 Hayden Ave. Culver City, CA 90232 Phone: 310.837.8863 December, 2004 . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION I INTRODUCTION TO AMENDMENT NO. 1 1.1 INTRODUCTION TO AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE 1.1.1 Introduction The Temecula City Council approved the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan (SP-14) on November 26,2002. The Specific Plan Document consisted of two (2) volumes and contained then following components: . Section 1 - Genefal Plan Consistency . Section 2 - Specific Plan Components . Section 3 - Planning Areas and Development Standards . Section 4 - Design Guidelines . Section 5 - Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance . Section 6 - Timing and Responsibility of Improvements . Section 7 - City of Temecula Conditions, Summary and Errata Sheet The approved Roripaugh Ranch community is comprised of 2,015 single-family dwelling units on approximately 804.7 acres with a gross density of 2.5 units/acre and a net residential density of 4.9 units/acre. Additional uses include 15.4 acres of neighborhood commercial, 32.0 acres for two school sites (elementary and middle school), 24.8 acres for two public park sites, 9.1 acres for two private recreation centers and a private mini-park, a 1.5 acre fire station site, 39.1 acres for flood control purposes, 202.7 acres of open space and 21.2 acres of landscape slope. Minor modifications to the Land Use, Design Guidelines and Development Standards for the approved Specific Plan have necessitated Amendment No. 1 to the Specific Plan. This Amendment has been established through the use ofthis Addendum. Once approved, this Addendum will be incorporated into the Specific Plan document. Reviewers of the Specific Plan document will review the Addendum and its associated modifications for revised standards and guidelines prior to consulting the associated sections of the prior, approved Specific Plan document. Details of the modifications are contained within the ensuing Sections of this Addendum. 1.2 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE AND SPECIFIC PLAN 1.2.1 Overview As stated in Section I of this Addendum, minor modifications to the Land Use, Design Guidelines and Development Standards forthe approved Specific Plan have necessitated Amendment NO.1 to the Specific Plan. This Amendment has been established through the use of this Addendum. The following criteria will apply to the Specific Plan and the Specific Plan Amendment: . Reviewers of the Specific Plan document will review the Addendum and its associated modifications to the Standards and Guidelines prior to consulting the associated sections of the prior, approved Specific Plan document. . Whenever there are discrepancies between the information contained in the Specific Plan Amendment and the Specific Plan, the information contained within the Specific Plan Amendment shall prevail. . The Director of Planning shall provide a written Specific Plan Consistency Determination, in the event that ambiguity still exists between the Specific Plan and the Specific Plan Amendment. RoripaUQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION I INTRODUCTION TO AMENDMENT NO.1 DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY Section I 1.1 This Section is an Introduction to the Specific Plan and the Specific Plan Amendment. It includes the approval date, the Specific Plan components, a project description of the approved and a brief introduction to the Specific Plan Amendment. 1.2 This Section contains specific criteria that will apply to the Specific Plan and the Specific Plan Amendment. 1.3 Descriptive Summary. Section II Section II of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the following modifications: . Table 2-1 (Residential Land Uses by Land Use Designations; . Table 2-2 (Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA); . Section 2.10 (Walls and Fences Master Plan) based on changes to Planning Areas lA, 7B, 10, 12 and 27; and . A footnote has been added to Table 2-2, which indicates the specific Planning Areas where single- story elevations will be required. Single-story elevations will be required in Planning Areas in which the minimum lot sizes are 5,000 square feet and larger. These Planning Areas are: 10,16,17,18, 19, 20, 21, 33A & 33B. All other Planning Areas will not contain minimum lot sizes that are conducive for single-story elevations. Section III Section III of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the modifications to acreage, overall units, density, and minimum lot size, consistent with Table 2-2 (Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA), for the following Planning Areas: . Planning Area lA; . Planning Area 78; . Planning Area 10; . Planning Area 12; and . Planning Area 27. Section IV Section IV of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the following modifications: . To the language and Figures for the Fuel Modification of Open Space, as it relates to Planning Areas 10,13,14,15,16,17 and 19 and Figures 4-34A, 4-348-1, 4-348-2, 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2; and . Modifications to the Architectural Design Guidelines text and Figures for the architectural styles that will be encouraged in the Specific Plan. Section V Section V of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the following: . Amended Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance; . Standards have been added the Low Density Estates (L-E) for Planning Area 10; . Allowing single-family detached units in Planning Areas 12,14 and 15; . Table 5.1 (Schedule of Permitted Uses - Residential Districts) has been expanded to include the L-E designation; 2 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION I INTRODUCTION TO AMENDMENT NO. 1 . Table 5.2-1 (Accessory Structures Setbacks) has been added; and . Table 5.2-2 (Maximum Encroachments into Required Yard Areas) has been added. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 3 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION II SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS OVERVIEW Section II of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains modifications to Table 2-1 (Residential Land Uses by Land Use Designations, Table 2-2 (Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA), and Section 2.10 (Walls and Fences Master Plan) based on changes to Planning Areas lA, 7B, 10, 12 and 27. In addition, a footnote has been added to Table 2-2, which indicates the specific Planning Areas where single-story elevations will be required. Single-story elevations will be required in Planning Areas in which the minimum lot sizes are 5,000 square feet and larger. These Planning Areas are: 10,16,17,18,19,20,21, 33A & 33B. All other Planning Areas will not contain minimum lot sizes that are conducive for single-story elevations. 2.1.2 Project Land Uses Residential Uses (See Figure 2-1) The project proposes a maximum of 2,015 residential dwelling units on a variety of lot sizes, ranging from 3,000 square feet to one acre in size. The following table is a breakdown of the residential component of the project: Table 2-1 Residential Land Uses by Land Use Designations Land Use Planning Acres Dwelling Density Percentage Designation Areas Units Low W,19,20, .w+,e ~ 5A Residential (L) 21, 33A and 99.5 Wi 0.9 338 97 4.8 ~ow De1ti~ states ) 10 8.1 14 1.7 0.7 low Medium lA, 2, 3, 4A, ~ 4.8 46,6 Res. (LM) 48,16,17 196.8 g;j9 and 18 945 46.8 Medium 23 and 24 21.5 122 5.7 6.1 Residential (M1) (&toRdarElj .Medium 12,14,15, 88.9 I>.{; #.,Q Residential 22 and 31 ll4l> (M2) 837 9.4 41.6 (Standard and Clustered) Project Total 41U 2,015 4.9 100 414.8 *A maximum of20% cluster housing (169 ~Ait6) can be zero lot line as illustrated in Figures 4-78 and 4-81. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 4 December, 2004 I SECTION II SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS I I Table 2-2 Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PAl I PA Land Use (Density) Acres Densny Min. Lot Size (51) Unns lA' Residential - Low Medium .w,g ~ 5,000 Qll 21.0 4.9 104 lB' Mini-Park (private) 0.3 N/A N/A N/A 2' Residential - Low Medium 18.4 5.4 5,000 99 3' Residential - Low Medium 18.6 5.3 5,000 99 4At Residential - Low Medium 41.8 5.1 5,000 213 B' 5 Recreation Center 5.2 N/A N/A N/A (private) 6 Neighborhood Park 5.1 N/A N/A N/A Landscape Slope 1.7 N/A N/A N/A 7A Open Space/Landscape 19.5 N/A N/A N/A Slope 711, Open Space/Flood ~ N/A N/A N/A C Control 1.8 8 Open Space/Habitat 12.5 N/A N/A N/A 9A, Open Space/Habitat 10.6 N/A N/A N/A B 10' Residential- Low 8.1 4.4 :!G;QOO 44 Density Estates 1.7 10,000 14 11 Neighborhood 15.4 N/A N/A N/A Commercial 12 Residential - Medium 2 16.4 U 3,000 446 (CI".te"~l 8.3 136 13 Open Space/Habitat 179.6 N/A N/A N/A 14 Residential - Medium 2 13.5 11.4 3,000 154 (Ciu.tere~l Open Space/Flood 3.6 Control 15 Residential - Medium 2 14.1 11.3 3,000 159 (Clu.tero~) 16' Residential- Low Medium 28.4 5.1 5,000 145 17' Residential - low Medium 40.2 4.3 6,000 172 18' Residential - Low Medium 28.4 4.0 6,000 113 19' Residential - Low 31.2 1.0 20,000 30 20' Residential- Low 30.3 1.0 20,000 30 21' Residential- Low 23.9 .9 20,000 22 22 Residential - Medium 2 20.3 8.1 3,000 164 (Clustered) 23 Residential - Medium 10.9 6.1 4,000 67 24 Residential - Medium 10.6 5.2 4,000 55 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Planning Areas where single~story products are required. Single-story elevations will be required in Planning Areas in which the minimum lot sizes are 5,000 square feet and larger. I 5 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I . SECTION II SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS I I Table 2-2 (Continued) Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA) I Land Use (Density) Acres Density Min. Lot Size (sl] Units 25 Open Space/Flood 8.2 N/A N/A N/A Control 26 Open Space/Flood 22.1 N/A N/A N/A Control 27 Sports Park .w;.r N/A N/A N/A 21.1 N/A N/A N/A QpeR SpaselFIG9d +.4 GMlfeI 28, Middle School 20.0 N/A N/A N/A 29 Elementary School 12.0 30 Recreation Center 4.0 N/A N/A N/A I. (private) 31 Residential - Medium 2 24.6 9.1 3,000 224 (Clustered) 32 Public Institutional (Fire 2.0 N/A N/A N/A Station) 33 Residential- Low (PA 11.8 1.1 20,000 15 A' 33A) & Residential- Low (PA 2.3 B' 33B) Public/Private Roads 45.2 N/A N/A N/A TOTAL 804.7 2.5 2,015 I I I I I I I Planning Areas where single~story products are required. Single-story elevations will be required in Planning Areas in which the minimum lot sizes are 5,000 square feet and larger. I I I I I I I Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 6 I December, 2004 i ." Gi c :>l m 'l" ~ rn ~'010mmWlioomoOD ~ Q "'lI"'lI~"':J:"llm"'ll"'ll(l)z:z:r::::r:::r-""6 i ~ :;tiC 6>cc;:o;a~",rn....mog z ;;~oo~l!l~;;;;;~Qi5PP:t :;: 1:1 0 -10(/)0>0 ~.... :r%cc~OC c: 0 ~ m~gn-l_~mm(/)~~mmm~~(/) " ~ ~ "'lI0 zo;a;l:"'lI;:o;ozz20')UJ m ~ ~m:~ ~~~~~8g~~i~~ ~~6~ 3~~~ oO~m~m~ ~ (II ~ 0 -1~ ~O(/) ~>~ ~ (/) 280 0;.... --10 g i: ~~z 7'~~ ~~~ i D "iI ~ m",;:a:::l ~ i~ ~ird~ ~ ~ ~~ ~.e.~ .. .., z ~ 1 ~ _ r I ( ggg"'ll~;o~(/)ZZ~:r:::""~rg ......_-~O"'ll"'ll"'llO -i:m m [IJ > ~ CI~~~S...~... ~~ca:~i...:g ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~bb~~~-~~~~~~(/) 0 ~ m z N . i ~ :e:::::~ ~ ~ N C " ~ z ~ ~Hj~::t ~ 8 ~: :::::l c - ....: -.,' '-' ~ ~ ~ ...:... ~ ~) :::::l " :: - " ...:.. - a -.Ii I I I I I I I I I ~~---------- I .' 01 =~==--- ~....~ t:~ --:::::: I ~~ li~ z , ~ . .' 'Z i~g.i[iii~i _~.g:l "":I N::> u:!.. N5".5"95"P5"~ r~ =i ~i ~r; CD 0: !:$- $~ [ it..."'_ =!1........ 'i" i;tii'~3:{~:~ li;Iii[~[ ..tl~~3;i 31'" ~~ <o9:i:o=o :~ ~:..: ~ ~ .= ~...~~.! ~ g:g2.ilb~ CD 3 =.2. ;a.. .. ;: "~~l>i5 i lit~iii~ 3 13',...!l:"" 2. ~ 5" CI m", a~ Ii 3" s:~~l!l3= 3 !it cql: Gl 0" C <> 8" 23. g:<:-;." : ~!"o!"i.; .e, c it lil<>. a iiI "0 3. ~ 3. ~ 6"" 6" '" s=~ - ~ <>> II ~ g a a 1 l: 'i 0 ~ ~ ~ if 3 .;? cr-o g g CI l: a'i ~ ~~ .;? r " ~ I I I I I I I I I J Proposed Land Use Plan _'__.....T.-_""',., _ I -n 15 c: '" m '" '" ~ . ~ ! I \ I I \ I I \ I I \ I . ~ I ~gw ~- I i~Ujf' 0 [l] [i] llJ [!] GJ []] [J] I i1!lit~ 'i 'l'I~I'i 'I 'I'{ I J ~ 111111~ % 1111 ! f [n Ii I I I x xi 1 !ii~ J! [I ~! I f I", ![ .9.9"" ~ ~ :3 !I]~~E1[l][!]t1~gill] nUll f i I J Ii IIi $i~HII i I IlIlil lfiils:1i i! k' ! ! ~ I ill~ g I" _ . ElUTTERFlELD - ~ . ~'Il~ ~...I\) 1;"ClD N '" " ~g ~ "" 2~~ .0 I I l i j l f l j 8 ~ ~ o ... '"' -" '"' " ::: ::To '"'- ~~ ~T ~~ ~ ... ... I"' ..:... ... 5 .Ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I !!l~ .;.". O"'....(Q .~ r~~-~~= I Conceptual Circulation Master Plan __..............T__.-""...T '''' I o n ~ ~ ~ .. . j~~ , m ill .. ~~rN ~~ ~~i> I ,:. ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ EJ0[I][l][I]ID ~ fPf ~n~ ~; ~ f fl f~ In~ Ii f t<if ~~ if! ~i I iii I i5" :r ~ ~ ~ "" o m [l]ITJIT]rnll Ii f I !il~ u t' fj' i .. '!l!t.!i!' !i!' II i~ = ~ ~f f i I ~ i .~"" e em~ ~-~ .. ~ 12W""O .~ l .,~ J~~~i ..-" (1: -,1 l j- .. - . CN""~ , ~ .~ ~=~.."""",L=="""6o;,~-- OOOQllO #' ...... Q~ " Gi c " m '" U, n 1 i I I ~gw ~- ........ \\ i~5o; \ NO ~:::i~ .~ iikl ~~J:C;; ." ~r-~ .. -j !i~ if i 1.01:1\) - ~~-~ , ,I I " l~f J.l -.'" - !~1 ~ ~ N"'- ...!f': Q~J:: , <~- - ~ ?r-' B~:!!d I r~ "" s ~~" I I J - 8 ~: - ,... ~ - - - ::.: ~r= ~~ ~. .~f~\~{: t=-.,. .-- ,.- - - ~ '- - I _I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I u -' .-~_..- I I Pedestrian/Bicycle Circulation Plan _!II'>Clr1OO31.S5't.....&<TIARGERD'WGtll31367_f<I$.<l2'PRPXIJOO2.SC"'"" I (j ',-: ' >> I . . >> :- 5 o u .., 15 c: ;U m '" a, o ;; " 'i .. i~ ~~~> " ~~i:1\) " ~ ~ ~~~~",~~ Q",'.9% ~ ~g~ I ~ ~- I : ::::--J "'.......""- .OID ~!!!> 8;; 0"''''"'''' :ii~J::> ---- 1 r- - fi----- ~ --V =_~::~- "= ~ \. ~~ z -----:;.__ .:'~ 1 ~lil)> I ~";;::1 I '0 -r' -0 _ _~o 0, ." a 1 ~ 10 [1 3 o . ,,- ." ... m mm Ww mrn 1000 I 'i! r ~ ~ ." ~. I! ." a I II [1 3 o . ". ." '6' m ~ 1l ~ ~ ~ r c . ,,- ." ii' <!~ ~ !>~ 1l !Il~ s: t~ ~ <g::J: (I) ..~ ![ U~ - '" ~ ~~ 2: f= ~ r . .f> . i g 1J. ;;- ~ ~ ~ if ~ !i' ". oil m ,#'.0 If :tl Ii" !l. !!2 ~ c . ,,- f m . ll. ~ 2' ;r 3 " " ~ g J 8 ~: I I I I _I -- ~ -'. - - -. j: -'-. ?: - I I I I I Q~ l~$f :;:~......... ~~mo :gc;; ~- \ 1 1 \ 1 1 ..,...~;\ ( ! ,\1 \ - - ("'/ ,t-- ~ oa !l; '. , \\\ ::........ ~~O...... 1l0....0 / /' \ \ *1;1 ...... ~~~O) ~~"- ;!11l:-.J ..t: -=--~~ ---..,.~~- ~. !:l .. ~~... /. I ,"0 I i~ l ~A ~_.lii I .- ~~~fd - , ;.., ~ i# I ~ l ~ ' ~ i!. ~ ~ I!. ~ oil Ii' m a il' . . ~ . . m ~ N o t I , ! I I I I I I I I I Conceptual Drainage Master Plan __..........T_.""".."'..'~_4... I C) o u ~ 1 I II /, II i1:_ I ltl . 2~.......... g~!:~ .0 " ~:'i:N '0 0111011 i 'l ,;!' ~ i r~ ~ tf. t.iP" [ . ~ ~ ~5 ~ !! ~i !bp;: i! ;;s. f H !~ a 'Ii ~ ~ " U][D[I]w[I][I][l] l" rif ,~ ,~ J!1 'i' jig; iP~j-ia~ '"i' " . !!: EO; . Ii" - - U"- iI l!!:;E ilI~ Am ilQ;! :!; ~(~f ~i"" ~~ ~cn S';eir ~fll ~~ L ~f ~ ~ *~ - ~~ cal -i.... 8'" :E ~ );0. ~ ~ ~ l I - . $ '" .l!. 8 ~: _I - .... - ::::-: J~ -'- ~ "- "...... - - ~ ....:... - 1 I I I I I I I -n Gi c :>J m 'l' ~ ~ I I \ I I i~~o ~~~ ~ flO,o.O 'I :::0...... ~~c;u g~'"'.... ...0-" EO STAG '00---- 00" " , ~ . .5a......... ~~!:-..j ~m"""~~::iiiiii: J - ~ " " 0......0 .~ L I I "1 ., ~~.... =. ~~:!!~ I I I I I I I I I I I Conceptual Open Space & Recreational Master Plan PIonod:SI2llo'2OO38:<>>10Ml9y:Lil.ARGEAOWG:N:\31361.~POlI-G2'I'RPX000;2.11D<<li I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION II SPECIFIC PLAN COMPONENTS 2.10 WALLS AND FENCES MASTER PLAN 2.10.2 Walls and Fencing The material, style and height of walls and fences shall provide an element of visual continuity throughout Roripaugh Ranch. All construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project architecture. The following wall and fence applications shall be provided throughout the project area: 1. Proiect or Privacy Walls (See Figure 2-15) Project walls will be constructed within the project as shown on Figure 2-14 for visual and noise attenuation where appropriate. Project walls will be constructed of slump stone. PilasteFS I'AII be iAGluded iA theme 'Nail GOAstruGlieA at I3rel3eFty liAss, GhaAges iA 'JemGal er heFizoAtal directieA aAd at measured iAtervals al3l3fel3Fiale te the leAgth ef the wall fUA. Project wall pilasters will be spaced at approximately one hundred feet (100') to one hundred fifty feet (150') on center. Project walls will not exceed 6 feet in height. All Project Walls will be constructed by the developer. 2. Privacv Fence (See Figure 2-15) Privacy fences as shown in Figure 2-15 will be located in residential interior and side yards. This feAGiAg shall iAGlude a l3ilasier '.Vith a l3estfGal3. All Privacy Fences will be constructed by the merchant builders. 3. Privacv Fencina at Front of Homes (See Figure 2-15) Privacy fencing at front of homes will be located as illustrated in Figure 2-15. This fencing will include a wood post and gate, stUGGe fiAish masonry (slumpstone block) pilaster w/precast concrete cap and a 6' high masonry (slumpstone) wall with 6WGGa precast concrete cap. All fencing will be a color that is neutral or consistent with the adjacent residence. This fence will be constructed by the merchant builder. 4. View Fence (See Figure 2-16) One type of view fence will be utilized where view opportunities exist. The purpose of this fence is to allow for maximum view opportunities. This fence will be a maximum of six feet in height and will be either dark broAze er Gepl3er Dunn Edwards SP56 'Weathered Brown' tubular fencing material. The fence will also include a pilaster with a precast concrete cap. All View Fences will be constructed according to the timing specified in Section 6.0. 7 RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 , ~ o \.. i ~ o ." 15 c ;u m ~ ... I I \ I I \ ! I \ I I --=..-..-- Conceptual Walls and Fen~_~_~, M~.~~er Plan '0_ ~~(,J [U[U[I]ITJornrnrnITJI ff f~ fit r fJ H ri: U f{ ! !I !.{ d !i !~ !~ !~ !~ 51 5~ 0\1 5~ ".. "~5 0\ 0\ ~ ! [~ . -~ I -- a ~ ."... ~ to .:E ~fs; ;;j ~ - I - ; h [!]~~S ff. 1'1 f~ 1'1 f ~" fl f" :!:i ~e !:~ :!:i ..,,, -~ tj tj .... t3 :t:B - l' i I ~ :!: - ... ~ ~ .~ ~~r- '. ~~:2fd 8 ~: _I ..... ...... '"' '-' ::J -' '-' ~ ;:: i1q ~'0 ~If ~ ;l.: ... ... '"' ;..;.. ... .f'O......... Ufif r~'H sgls~ -Sl J! - li"1f8~ ~ I' Ii: ~ !l:[oil lm.!l . S woS! c;'a.miil' liul6. i~9ce ~ ijI' 0 !E. ..nii !-itlf3 uti ~ ~ .!l IS ~ ~~ ~ ~,. SJ!l I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~: I :_'\~>- \~l >,;- Ii \'~.. ~ 'I ~ ~. ~ , \-.~ ; ~ ~2 ~ 11--1\ I~B! +-J.J 0 0 1(r U' ~ 10. L.'-::';--11 ~--1~ ~. ""4r ~",-, ~~~~ :,~~ ~~~~ r ~ ~ )>0 r r ~ =l J: "tl ~ m :II (fl ~ ~ o i ~ g I i z . ~ J) I' 11 ik '_ i.; ~ ---"'~"1 ii, \1 Ii i. I.:. ..-...1.\' _._ . ~ . --'::--i J' I , ..; I ~~8 ., I ~ ~ ~ '1'.' ':..'1__..[: -.1 i I -". II~ ~_.-::. ::":j ~ ~ .-- 8 g -- r- ~ '" -.' lQi i <....... U -- i "tl :II <: Q ." ~ () m ~ I ~ . I i ~ Ullli ~ub ;~Jli I~ iH h el Wll11 ~I! ~i U ~~. ~~ n ~ ~~ ! Jd g a . ~ ~t - ~~ II a . i ~ I: ~ ~ . .-< .. ~." _ I m i ~ ';;::1 ~G o 5 2. "tl A '-.J m.. I ~. ~~ ::Ie 1 '-'- ~_ rn l~"" :". =l ((r;; , - "'.~_'.C( {,,il Q \-(l. '; ..... ....... '" - ~ " - "" I I I I I I I I I ~ I I ~ . g . g hll a!' ~ n~ U' IIi Iii I . t "tl :II <: Q ." m z () Z Gl ~ ." :II o Z -l o ." J: o ;:: rn ~ ~ 1111 aul .. ~ s Hi Iii 1.: "tl :II 2 m () -l ~ i a ~ I ~ Ill! ! Hal ~ r~s !l I) ~ ~ . ~ ~ . "tl :II 2 Pl -l ~ - Gl :II m m z ~ (fl 5 "tl m -l ~ rn :3 ~ i a ~ I ~ I < ~ a ~ !l ~ z " .. I I I I I I I I Project Walls and Privacy Fences ___.u......_lWt.._. .... I I I . . . ~ ~: I . - ...... ~ '-' - ....: -' '-' _. - :f~ ...:... ~'" ~f :::: ~ - - ,.... ....:.. - I I I I I I I ." is c: ;>J m ~ '" ! . ! . i I ! , , i i o o JJ z m JJ 5 -i o o z o =1 (5 z Iii .i~ ~r I~; ~J~ "'i .~ ~~~ ;~~ ~i~ ~J a~. .Jo .o~ I-~F ~. ~m Z ~ . 1 ~ 1 1m ~~" n! .I~~ ~.~ , pl~ .. .' ,. ~/ ~un; ~&~Ia . :5 m ::E .." m Z o Z Gl z " '" i ~ ~ ~ . . o < iii ::E .." m Z o Z Gl lip U .~~ 1 ~ a ~ ~h~ wd !~ l~ f ~ ~ ~ z ~ . I I I I I I I I View Fences --'_._~--_._-------_.- I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OVERVIEW I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Section III of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the modifications to acreage, overall units, density, and minimum lot size, consistent with Table 2-2 (Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA) , for the following Planning Areas: lA, 78, 10, 12 and 27. 3.1 PLANNING AREAS 1A and 18 3.1.1 Descriptive Summary Planning Areas lA and 18, as depicted on Figure 3-1, provides for development of ~21.0 acres with Low Medium Density Residential use (Planning Area 1 A) and for the development of a .3 acre Mini-Park (Planning Area 18). Planning Area lA is planned for98104 single family dwelling units ata density of ~ 4.9 du/ac. Minimum lot size shall be 5,000 square feet. 3.1.2 Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. 3.1.3 Planning Standards Circulation Standards 1. Planning Area lA shall only have one access point onto Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Access to Planning Area 1 A will be provided from Murrieta Hot Springs Road along the north perimeter of the planning area. This access shall be right-in and right-out only. Potential access points as depicted, are conceptual. Access into Planning Area 1A from Murrieta Hot Springs Road as well as access between Planning Afeas 1 A and 2 shall be determined when tentative tract maps are prepared. Proposed road access land located within County property between the Murrieta Hot Springs Road right-of-way and the project's north property line will need to be acquired or an access easement secured. Access points shall be designed and located to provide adequate and safe access through adjacent planning areas from a traffic and fire safety standpoint. 2. Secondary access shall be provided to Murrieta Hot Springs Road prior to the issuance of the 341h building permit in this planning area. The location and design of the secondary access shall be subjectto approval by the City. 3. A round-about shall be provided in the southeastern portion ofthe Planning Area as illustrated in Figure 3-1. The purpose of the round-about is to slow traffic along the roadway. 4. Vehicular access acceptable to the Fire Department shall be provided from this planning area to the Nature Walk as illustrated in Figure 3-1. This access shall be only used for maintenance purposes. Landscape and Recreation Standards 5. A Card Key Gated Secondary Entry, as illustrated in Figure 4-21, shall be provided at the northeast corner of the planning area adjacent to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. This access shall be right-in and right-out only. 6. An Auto and Pedestrian Gated Entry, as illustrated in Figure 4-20C, shall be provided behind the Card Key Gated Secondary Entry. 7. The 0.3 acre Mini-Park designated as Planning Area 18 shall be provided adjacentto Planning Area lA as illustrated in Figures 3-1 and 4-9. The Mini-Park shall include the following uses: RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 8 December, 2004 I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS following uses: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . Shade arbor . One play structure for ages 2-5 years . Picnic table on slab . Benches . Low decorative steel fencing with pilasters and gate . Landscape and irrigation improvements . Project Wall (Figure 2-16) along the eastern and northern boundary . Low Wall with Pilaster (Figure 2-16) along the eastern and southern boundary 8. The Nature Walk will be located adjacent to Planning Area lA as illustrated in Figures 4-12, 4-15 and 4-15A. 9. Five paseos will be provided within Planning Area lA as illustrated in Figures 4-1 and 4-38. These paseos shall provide direct access to the Nature Walk. These paseos are conceptual in nature and the exact location and design will be determined prior to approval of the final map. 10. Front yard landscaping as depicted in Figures 4-85 through 4-89, shall be installed by the merchant builder and maintained by the property owner. Walls and Fences Standards 8. A Project Wall, as illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-15), shall be located along the northern perimeter of the planning area. 12. A View Fence, also illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-16) shall be located along the western and southern perimeter of Planning Area 1 adjacent to the Nature Walk. Miscellaneous Standards 13. Residential lots within Planning Area lA that are located within 175 feet of the southern property line shall have a minimum rear yafd setback of twenty-five (25) feet. If the residence is visible from homes along the north side of Nicolas Road, enhanced landscaping shall be installed to help screen views from Nicolas Valley (See Figure 4-15). The developer shall prepare a plan that identifies lots within 175 feet of the southern perimeter and lots that may have views visible from the north side of Nicolas Road. The plan shall be submitted to the City for review prior to approval of the tentative tract map. The City reserves the right to request additional landscaping for screening purposes fOf the enhanced landscape areas after the installation of the landscaping and construction of the homes. 14. Prior to approval of the precise grading plan, a noise mitigation analysis shall be performed for residences within 200 feet of the edge of right-of-way of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Butterfield Stage Road, "North Loop Road", "South Loop Road" or any other noise sensitive uses on the project site potentially exposed to exterior noise levels. The analysis must demonstrate that planned noise protection will meet City standards to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. 15. Please refer to Section 2.1 through Section 2.10 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide. Roripau!1h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 9 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 2.1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2.2 Circulation Master Plan 2.3 Drainage Master Plan 2.4 Water Master Plan 2.5 Sewer Master Plan 2.6 Grading Master Plan 2.7 Phasing Plan-Public and Private Facilities 2.8 Open Space Recreation and Trails Master Plan 2.9 Landscape Master Plan 2.10 Walls and Fences Master Plan 16. Please see Section 4.0 (Design Guidelines) for criteria related to the development of Planning Areas 1A and 1 B. Timina and Responsibility of Improvements 17. Please see Section 6.0 (Timing and Responsibility of Improvements) for phasing of improvements within Planning Areas lA and 1 B. Roripauqh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 10 December, 2004 . ~ ~ ~ y ~ "'z -.0 mI 00 'n," 5p:! ~~ ~ A s; z o ~ m 2! ~ m ill f'. l.- I ~'.-~ \ ~I I , , . . I . ;:1 U ~I :tl o ..... il ~!I --- .".".11_11." s::E~ -a(!;OJ (O~ (000 o:c,.'1'V C)>S:: 00(") ..-"." 10 ~ ~. I' ~. I~ I!~ " )> o~ II~ g:g i)>w .(") I~ I! Ii ,i Ii I! Ii Ii Ii ~ ~ > >~ H >> g; .~ ;<2 3.5 .~ s~ r< ii '. 'e:= .. " ~-:c ~~ ,B'!!, '> ~~ ,~ ii b= ;i ~i" 's 3 i e ~ i . E ~ ~ . 8 ~: '= ~ '"' - '"' -" '"' ~ ,... 50 '"'- ~~ ~y ..... AJ ~ - '-' ~ - '-' -.I. I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I ~ llJ ~~rnrn[j]B[I]rnrnrnrn I ';'iJ &':'=9. J I ..., ~ ... ...... b~ ~...... is ~i~ r;~~1l ~ c ~ ~~i ~ 'I f I 'f JPj'P!'i'iHfU Iii; 't' ~" ~ f i 1= f f~ i i!!: ii i" it ~; 1< 1 I ~~ i 1>1 ~i ~i ~,,~ ~! ~~ - l~ il....- l"~~l l l ~ I ~ if it j liB l li ~ ~ a . -- ~ Planning Area One A (1A) and One B (1B) ---.......--- - . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.7 PLANNING AREAS 7A, +8, 7e, 8 AND PORTIONS OF 6 3.7.1 Descriptive Summary As depicted in Figufe 3-7A, Planning Areas 7A, +8, 7C, 8 and portions of 6 will remain as flood control, landscape slope and open space. This includes 3,81.8 acres for detention basins (Planning Areas 78 aRs7C), 21.2 acres for landscape slope (Planning Area 7A and portions of 6) and 12.5 acres for open space (Planning Area 8). These areas contain topo and drainage features that will be incorporated into the Roripaugh Ranch planned community. These areas will be maintained by the HOA with the exception of Planning Area 8. Planning Area 8 will be maintained by the appropriate habitat maintenance organization. Planning Area 7B is being incorporated into Planning Area 1A, as drainage is being conveyed to an off-site facility, which has been detennined to be adequately sized for the runoff created by this portion of the project. 3.7.2 Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. 3.7.3 Planning Standards Circulation Standards 1. Vehicular access into Planning Areas 7A, +8, 7C, 8 and portions of 6 shall be restricted to only maintenance vehicles. 2. Access into the fuel modification areas located in Planning Area 8 shall be approved by the Fire Department prior to approval of the final map. 3. Adequate pedestrian circulation shall be provided between the Nature Walk and the surrounding area. Paseo connections shall be provided as illustrated in Figure 3-7A. The portion of the paseo that crosses the MWD easement as shown in Figures 3-7 and 4-4, shall be subject to MWD approval prior to the approval of the final map. Landscaoe and Recreation Standards 4. The Nature Walk will be located in Planning Area 7A adjacentto Planning Areas lA through 48 as illustrated in Figures 3-7A, 4-12, 4-15 and 4-15A. 5. A Variable Width Fuel Modification Zone, as illustrated in Figures 4-15, 4-15A and 4-34B-1 and 4-34B-2 will be provided within Planning Area 7A. Walls and Fences Standards 6. A View Fence will be provided between Planning Area 7A and Planning Areas lA through Planning Area 4B as illustrated in Figures 2-14, 2-16 and 3-7A. . 7. TRe two One detention basins (Planning Areas 78 aRd 7C) will be enclosed with chain link fencing as depicted in Figure 3-7A. 8. A View Fence, as illustrated in Figures 2-14,2-16, 3-7A and 4-4 will be located atthe top of slope in Planning Area 6 separating the landscape slope from the park. 9. A Split-Rail Fence as illustrated in Figures 2-14, 2-17 and 4-15A will be provided along the south side ofthe Nature Walk. Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 11 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 10. A Property Line Fellce as illustrated ill Figures 2-14 and 2-17, will be provided along the eastern, southern and western perimeter of the planning area. 11. A Property Line Fence along the south side of Planning Area 7A shall be a three-rail horse fence with wire mesh approximately 5'-6' to 6' high. Miscellaneous 11. Please refer to Section 2.1 through Section 2.10 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide. 2.1 Comprehensive land Use Plan 2.2 Circulation Master Plan 2.3 Drainage Master Plan 2.4 Water Master Plan 2.5 Sewer Master Plan 2.6 Grading Master Plan 2.7 Phasing Plan-Public and Private Facilities 2.8 Open Space Recreation and Trails Master Plan 2.9 Landscape Master Plan 2.10 Walls and Fences Master Plan 12. Please see Section 4.0 (Design Guidelines) for criteria related to the development of Planning Area 5. Timino and Responsibility of Improvements 14. Please see Section 6.0 (Timing and Responsibility of Improvements) for phasing of improvements within Planning Areas 7A, 78, 7C, 8 and portions of 6. RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 12 December, 2004 i z J z & ~ ~ ~ ~ i . ~ ~ . g "" ~ . c' i o i i ~ & . ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ to, lfi 1$ i H i E lEI f d[i I' 1'<; ff d ~r ~i :::::: o ... ...: -" '-' ~ ~ ::To ~. ~r :::::: " t:: ... ,.... ....:.. ... . . . . _I I I I I I I I I I I I I 9 ~ ~~ ;:co I I I ." C5 c ;u m 't' ill I ,,1 f!lrnl [I] fjlfTlm []][@]~~rIlmmmmm mm r;;l lU l!JEJ WWW ~~~lIJWWWWWWW~ 1'f n 1'~ 1'1 1'~i 1'~ Ii 1';1'iL 1'~ 1'~ 1'i: 1'1 1'g 1'0' 1'l1'f ~i ti J f fr;Uf~fl~fi'l=i;;i~i~bifii:r;:~H hi 1:::.,. ~ ~I ~r; I;~ ~ II!:& -Ii ):1: j!;fl! !.il' Aii' i ~i' ~B ~~ L ):Q ):~ ~iE ~ ~ I l-.ll ..,.3", I! ti tll! ~I!: ~Q. .iHll 1 lit;e a: ;li'!f !r=- 5. . j\\~. J5""(1i( illi if" ~ !it ~ ~ ~ d' III !t.!iCi..!!I:~1i '" 11~.3......;:l,S$..:::IGI! - ". ." iii l: ~ !l ~ Z5. l!l ~ ! I j, ~ e Q f O'l I I I Planning Areas 9A, 98 and 13 Open Spaces __dUI.....T.-_....... "'... I I I I I I I I I I , I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.10 PLANNING AREA 10 3.10.1 Descriptive Summary Planning Area 10, as depicted on Figure 3-8, provides for 8.1 acres of development with Low Density Estates Residential use. This area is planned for 44 14 single family dwelling units at a density of 4.4 1.7 du/ac. Minimum lot size shall be 2O;Gllll1 0,000 square feet. 3.10.2 Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. 3.10.3 Planning Standards Circulation Standards 1. Access to the planning area will be provided from Murrieta Hot Springs Road. This access point shall be located directly across from 'A" Street. The exact location of access easements for this planning area shall be subject to review and approval by the City at the tentative tract map stage. Landscaoe and Recreation Standards 2. A Card Key Gated Secondary Entry, as illustrated in Figures 4-1 and 4-22E, shall be provided off of Murrieta Hot Springs Road that will allow access for both pedestrians and vehicles. 3. A Parkway Street Tree Treatment, as illustrated in the Landscape Master Plan (Figures2-13 and 4-26A), shall be provided along the north side of Murrieta Hot Springs Road. 4. A Fuel Modification Zone, as illustrated in Figures 4-34A, 4-348-1,4-348-2, aM 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2, shall be located within this area and adjacent to the eastern, northern and western perimeters of Planning Area 10. 5. Front yard landscaping as illustrated in Figures 4-85 through 4-89, shall be installed by the merchant builder/property owner and maintained by the homeowner. 6. An Auto and Pedestrian Gated Entry, as illustrated in Figure 4-20C, shall be provided behind the Card Key Gated Secondary Entry. Walls and Fences Standards 7. A View Fence, as illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-16), shall be located along the southern perimeter of the planning area adjacent to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. 8. A Residential/Habitat View Fence, as illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-17), shall be provided along the western, northern, and eastern perimeters of the planning area adjacent to Planning Afeas 9A and 98. This fence shall be of the same uniformity and design as it is installed by merchant builders consistent with Figure 2-17. Prior to the installation of the Residential/Habitat View Fence as noted in Figure 2-17, a temporary fence shall be installed by the developer to separate the habitat area from this planning area. The design of this temporary fence shall be approved by the City of Temecula and the appropriate resource agency prior to recordation of the final map. The temporary fence shall remain in place until such time the Residential/Habitat View Fence is installed by merchant builders. ROripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 13 December, 2004 I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Miscellaneous Standards 9. The two existing residences shall be removed from the site prior to development in this planning area. I I I 10. Prior to approval of precise grading plan, a noise mitigation analysis shall be performed for residences within 200 feet of the edge of right-of-way of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Butterfield Stage Road, "North Loop Road", "South Loop Road" or any other noise sensitive uses on the project site potentially exposed to exterior noise levels. The analysis must demonstrate that planned noise protection will meet City standards to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. 11. No transfer of dwelling units shall be allowed into Planning Area 10. 12. Please refer to Section 2.1 through Section 2.10 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide. I I I I I 2.1 2.2 2.3 2.4 2.5 2.6 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Circulation Master Plan Drainage Master Plan Water Master Plan Sewer Master Plan Grading Master Plan 2.7 Phasing Plan-Public and Private Facilities Open Space Recreation and Trails Master Plan Landscape Master Plan Walls and Fences Master Plan 2.8 2.9 2.10 13. Please see Section 4.0 (Design Guidelines) for criteria related to the development of Planning Area 10. TiminCl and Responsibility of Improvements 14. Please see Section 6.0 (Timing and Responsibility of Improvements) for phasing of improvements within Planning Area 10. I I I I I I I Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 14 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.12 PLANNING AREA 12 3.12.1 Descriptive Summary Planning Area 12, as depicted on Figure 3-10, provides for development of 16.4 acres with Medium Residential use. This area is planned for 44a approximately 136 clustered or detached fesidential single family dwelling units at a density of U 8.3 du/ac. A maximum of 20% (29 dweIliR!jIlAite) can be designed as zero lot line, as illustrated in Figures 4-78 and 4-81. Duplex units are not permitted within this planning area. Minimum lot size shall be 3,000 square feet. The transfer of dwelling units from other Planning Areas may occur into Planning Area 12 provided the following conditions are met: 1. The product mix shall not be changed as discussed in the above paragraph. 2. The total number of units within the project shall not exceed 2,015 dwelling units. 3. The total number of units proposed within this planning area shall not exceed 174 units which is based on the smaller of the following: 3.1 A 20% increase in the number of the approved units within this planning area (174 units), or 3.2 By applying the General Plan Medium Density of 12 dwelling units per acre to the net acres of this planning area (180 units). 3.12.2 Land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. 3.12.3 Planning Standards Circulation Standards 1. Access to the planning area will be provided from "A" Street and "B" Street as illustrated in Figure 3-10. The access off of "A" Street will be exit only. The exact location and number of access points for this planning area shall be reviewed and approved by the City at the tentative tract map stage. Access points shall be designed and located to provide adequate and safe access through adjacent planning areas from a traffic and fire safety standpoint. 2. Secondary access shall be provided into Planning Area 12 prior to the issuance of the 34th building permit in either planning area. The location and design of the secondary access shall be subject to approval by the City. Landscaoe and Recreation Standards 3. Two Card Key Gated Secondary Entries, as illustrated in Figure 4-1 and 4-22D, will be provided off of "A" Street and "B" Street into the planning area. 4. Two Auto and Pedestrian Gated Entries, as illustrated in Figure 4-20C, shall be provided behind the Card Key Gated Secondary Entry at "A" Street and "B" Street. 5. Landscape treatments, as illustrated in the Landscape Master Plan (Figures 2-13, 4-23F, 4- 30A, 4-30B and 4-31), shall be provided along Butterfield Stage Road, "A" Street and "B" Street. 6. A Primary Project Monumentation will be provided at the intersection of Nicolas Road and Butterfield Stage Road as illustrated in Figures 4-1 and 4-17. 7. One paseo, as illustrated in Figures 3-10 and 4-38, will be provided at the southern RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 15 December I 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS perimeter of the planning area connecting to Nicolas Road. 8. Front yard landscaping as illustrated in Figures 4-85 through 4-89 shall be installed by the merchant builder and maintained by the HOA. Walls and Fences Standards 9. A Project Wall, as illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-15), shall be located along the entire perimeter of the planning area. Miscellaneous Standards 10. Prior to approval ofthe precise grading plan, a noise mitigation analysis shall be performed for residences within 200 feet of the edge of right-of-way of Murrieta Hot Springs Road, Butterfield Stage Road, "North Loop Road", "South Loop Road" or any other noise sensitive uses on the project site potentially exposed to exterior noise levels. The analysis must demonstrate that planned noise protection will meet City standards to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Department. 11. Please refer to Section 2.1 through Section 2.10 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide. 2.1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2.2 Circulation Master Plan 2.3 Drainage Master Plan 2.4 Water Master Plan 2.5 Sewer Master Plan 2.6 Grading Master Plan 2.7 Phasing Plan-Public and Private Facilities 2.8 Open Space Recreation and Trails Master Plan 2.9 Landscape Master Plan 2.10 Walls and Fences Master Plan 12. Please see Section 4.0 (Design Guidelines) for criteria related'to the development of Planning Area 12. Timina and Responsibility of Improvements 13. Please see Section 6.0 (Timing and Responsibility of Improvements) for phasing of improvements within Planning Area 12. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 16 December, 2004 o > r ~ . > , -~ "'~ OWI.,f:::.. c)> s: (lJ ujC'l -- * <n_ W DCc,U) ~f; )> ~'" <n'"~ """)>~ OOO'1S::~ c:;o)>l\,) .p.. ",,,,C'l ~ I 18 I~: I. ....... "'" '"' I~. ... ,... - ::ro """- . .';;..\> .;t{t\"\. i .~~_~t, -~ >- ""'" I~ ... ... ~ .... I I I I ~;;J"~~;"~ Iii c>:"'~CD:;l:...... 0 ~~~~~*'~ ! ZG')' :J;2i!3:: 0 !:!l~;!l C'>15~:Z ~~ ~~ ~ ~Ol ;=: ~~: S 6!e. " :::I ~ Ii OJ rnrn s[I]rnrnrnrnrn }&' i~ ~~i~~g f;;ll'~ i~ f~ l~ :na ::n"C ;;!l;:::j:::!l-jO':lJ= -n3 ~- ::!l::E i'W ~ ~:;:o:;; <g"CD '2 'l!!a::J'2;JJ ~-g ~a 'g"'TI ~ cg=-r a~ jj1~ ii1i:ii1gSLiiI::I iiJiil ii1:$',; ii1~ :E ii1::r: tQ ~!; ~"'~8""tJa ~s ~-< ~~ ~s ~!!!. ~~ :.,.m ....a; ~CD""'~"" ....:z::.....""'.... .....-....fir l!:I[ &"'J) ~g lJi~ 1 &g [d;l i l ~;:; '"'00",,:::1 -.l JS ~"" ""m ",:::J '" "" ~Ql I!i! CD ':"o! =11..::;':" .:....... ~2.!. .-'.. -:";1 <1.8 ..:;;!c C>. 'l"1m...:::I .:::l.".:::l S .$ ..::!f6 tia. ~ $~Q ~ Of!> - as CD ---<: 1I CD m -~ J ~ ~ m il >!!!';lJZ ~ <g ~ ~ ~~~~ o. g. Q' ~"Ei y;g.~ ~~~. <ii""" i5'~-g ;!!!.'8 ~:m'::: 0,. ~~g . :li~ ;::!' . , ". .- o ~ ~ ~ "T1 15 c ;>:l m 't: o o (12) Planning Area "i [1]0 -ro "'" l,: ... -"-2"';l"il:'~ ,., '"..." ~- ~o '" ~~ "'~ L'" "'2'" - ~... '~;50 "=m~.., g;"-""f;P.m ';;; lil iIIlil _~ i.!l! h:." ii!" g;~ .~ .~ iII"'- j1[ ilig. ~= .;;; 'il. ~." !g !.1l. .m;m ij'o ilia c;:.., ''''-!l! ~il' ~g>.il:;--"3"-3- i~ li ~ !~~ U li!1;~)!; ~ t~ ..~ g 1'..1- ~13= ",,"'..... "'" ...1lI "''"n <:: ~ mal f"Il- C = :::II ,. &0 -G> - r ~ , ~ ~ '" _ ~ ~ ,. ~ 0 c e -;\' l'} ~;,g tl'} ~. 0 ~ "'~!'l3' ~~ il " 11 ::;- :i!!~." ;: il' tll '" ~ - o.aI III => III ~ = " ;,~ 5' " ~ t g o ~ e ~ ~ g ~ m ,. ia.,g InlfllOJmm[l]G:1[(i]Imi1~ ~lIJ WW f':j~EJ~ I I I . I . . I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.24 PLANNING AREA 27 3.24.1 Descriptive Summary Planning Area 27, as depicted on Figure 3-22, provides for development of ~ 21.1 acres as a Community Sports Park aRs 1.4 aeres fer flees eeRtrel pUFpeses. A conceptual site plan of the Community Sports Park is depicted in Figure 4-3 of Section 4.0, Design Guidelines. 3.24.2 land Use and Development Standards Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance. 3.24.3 Planning Standards Circulation Standards 1. One access to the planning area will be provided from "North Loop Road" along the northern perimeter of the planning area. The exact location and number of access points for this planning area shall be subject to review and approval by the City at the tentative tract map stage. Access points shall be designed and located to provide adequate and safe access through adjacent planning areas from a traffic and fire safety standpoint. 2. Since there will be a median island located in "South Loop Road", the access into this planning area is not required to be located directly across from the access into Planning Area 14. Landscape and Recreation Standards 3. A North and South Loop Road Treatment, as illustrated in the Landscape Master Plan (Figures 2-13 and 4-28), shall be provided along "North Loop Road". '4. A Primary Project Monumentation, as illustrated in Figures 4-2 and 4-17, shall be provided at the intersection of Butterfield Stage Road and "North Loop Road". 5. A River Walk will be provided along the southern perimeter of this planning within the Long Valley Wash as illustrated in Figures 3-21, 4-13 and 4-14. 6. A Bridge Monumentation, as illustrated in Figures 4-2, 4-20A and 4-20B, shall be provided on "North Loop Road" over the Santa Gertrudis Creek. 7. A Parkway Street Tree Treatment, as illustrated in the Landscape Master Plan (Figure 2-13 and 4-23C), shall be provided along Butterfield Stage Road. 8. The sports park will be developed, including permanent utilities and the completion of the 90-day maintenance period to the satisfaction of the Community Services Director, and the grant deed accepted by the City Council prior to the issuance of the 700th building permit. This park will be maintained by the TCSD. 9. This is a ~ 21.1 acre active. community park serving primarily the entire area of Roripaugh Ranch. This park site shall be fully improved and conveyed to the City of Temecula. The Community Sports Park, as illustrated in Figures 3-22 and 4-3, shall include, but not limited the recreation amenities listed in 4.2.1 - Community Sports Park. 10. A Paseo Entry Gate (Card Keyed), will be provided at the southeastern corner of the park off the River Walk as illustrated in Figures 4-3 and 4-37. Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 17 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION III PLANNING AREAS AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Walls and Fences Standards 11. A View Fence, as illustrated in the Walls and Fences Master Plan (Figures 2-14 and 2-16), shall be located along the southern and eastern perimeters of the planning area. A gate shall also be provided along the southeastern perimeter of the planning area as illustrated in Figure 4-3. 12. A View Fence, as illustrated in Figures 2-14, 2-16, 4-3 and 4-20A will be provided, along the perimeter of the flood control channel within this planning area. Miscellaneous Standards 13. Please refer to Section 2.1 through Section 2.10 for the following Development Plans and Standards that apply site-wide. 2.1 Comprehensive Land Use Plan 2.2 Circulation Master Plan 2.3 Drainage Master Plan 2.4 Water Master Plan 2.5 Sewer Master Plan 2.6 Grading Master Plan 2.7 Phasing Plan-Public and Private Facilities 2.8 Open Space Recreation and Trails Master Plan 2.9 Landscape Master Plan 2.10 Walls and Fences Master Plan 14. All plans and facilities shall be reviewed and approved by the' Director of Community Services prior to approval of the final map. Facilities shall be oriented toward active uses containing lighted ball fields and soccer fields. 15. Please see Section 4.2.1 (Park Design Guidelines) for criteria related to the development of Planning Area 27. 16. ^pll'eximately 1 A aGree aejaeeRt te "Nelth Leep Reae" aRe B~tlerfiele Stalle Reael'lill be devetee fer Fleee CeRIFel p~rpesee (see Fill~re 4 3). This area will be maiRtaiRee by the He!" er ether respeRsible party aGGeptable te the City. Timina of Improvements 17. Please see Exhibit A (Timing of Improvements) for phasing of improvements within Planning Area 27. Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 18 December, 2004 ! , ~ 5 ~ o u 8 ~- ; l I I " 15 c '" m ... !. ...... ~~""I'" ,,',: ill ::::: 6 CID ooe @ee e e @ @ @ ~ m~ 8 ~ m ~ ~ ~ m~nfi~ ~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ Ul~i~~.~~:a~it7~~>;!l~~~f~ ~ ~ ~;"c!l::@2~u.c:~c:lY ~~iii >o~..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ HI ~O'> ~Il'> ~ m 5ii ..... rn~~~~~~~s~~~~~:~~~w~ f; ~ t;:= g.,3 "'-1;0. U'l c: t::!:C7 0' ~.?iI: ~3: b ;a ~ Ro~ ~ ~ m ~::P! ~ 2t::!!?g ;:g !;: m e.;.j no :9 ,... NO 3: am CIl~ .. z z...a ><<>...",Z > ;o......m Z Q' ~ 0 ~ ~ ... >g ~ ;..~ ~> g ~ W 7- !2 ~ ~ ~ eg <n;:f ~ ~ lY Ui 2 iJ C~ ~~ m ~ II- iJ "< ....;0.. N ;0. ~ ii :<' ""g ti~ 6 ;0. z og: !'l iii Dllnll a ~ is ~ C! :x: 17 2 >- ~ ... 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ==I &\ ~ ~ (;) z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g gt !:f gl lY ~ ffi ~ ~ ri' ~ C' ~ ~ g 3: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::: .... ~ z ~ ~ a ~ :e ~ " n a ~ 1;7 ~ ~ ~ ti g:fe~l!i:~~1ifi::hr- .i~~~~~~~~~ ... >"'..............3:0'0' ::..8-l",~z~gt2!~ ril>; ml<\ll~"~,,, [lliJ 2m~53:~!j ~a >m"'o",<~ mr- g;!J~8rag:rn Z~83:c;7i!''''' li\~a~"3ii!2 3\0:: !;;! ;:f !>> '" .- > . r=-, ..... !!l ~ m ill ~ ~ ~ ~ . . "-l :... _I >- """ S ...J ...... '"' ^' - - ~ -.. '-' :;g~:;;' '- """ " ,... ..... >- ,..... ...:... ..... I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Landscape Master Plan ("Plateau") --,.,."""...".............""".........."""................_,.....,- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES OVERVIEW Section IV of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the modifications to the language and Figures for the Fuel Modification of Open Space, as it relates to Planning Areas 10, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 19 and Figures 4-34A, 4-34B-l, 4-348-2, 4-34C-l and 4-34C-2. This Section also contains modifications to the Architectural Design Guidelines text and Figures for the architectural styles that will be encouraged in the Specific Plan. 4.7 FUEL MODIFICATION OF OPEN SPACE (See Figures 4-34A, 4-348-1, 4-348-2, 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2) . The County of Riverside Fire Code requires fuel modification zones be maintained along residential edges adjacent to natural open space areas. Fuel modification zones represent a physical separation between development and open space. The purpose of this zone is to reduce the hazard of wildfires and to provide a natural and visual transition between developed areas and open space. The County of Riverside Fuel Modification Plan Guidelines is utilized as the City of Temecula has yet to formally adopt its own guidelines. The project site is surrounded by existing and proposed development that will eventually reduce the possibility of a regional wildfire. However; due to open space areas retained by the Land Use Plan, the possibility of fires will always exist. As a preventative measure to protect against fires within Roripaugh Ranch project, certain parcels containing open space will be required to set up a Fuel Modification Zone as shown in Figures 4-34A, 4-348-1, 4-348-2, 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2. Figures 4-348-1, 4-348-2, 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2 have been modified to meet the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service requirement that the Fuel Modification Zone not be developed within the permanent open space areas, rather, it shall be located within the adjacent residential Planning Areas. The primary criteria for achieving a fire safe buffer in this zone mandates that fuel load be lessened and the moisture content of the vegetative biomass be increased. 4.7.1 Guidelines A landscape maintenance program will be established, depicting a Fuel Modification Zone from the rear of a residential unit to undisturbed open space. The developer shall be responsible for establishing the Fuel Modification Zones, preparing a plan to implement the fuel modification and performing the required improvements. The Fuel Modification Plan shall be prepared in accordance with the County of Riverside Fire Code and reviewed for approval by the Community Development Director and City of Temecula Fire Department. Maintenance of all fuel modification areas shall be the responsibility of a master homeowners association. Three fuel modification zones are proposed as follows: Zone No. 1 Fuel Modification Zone No. 1 is located along the south and east project boundaries of the "Valley" (See Figure 4-34C-1, 4-34C-2), and will be established as follows: The fuel modification zone width is thirty feet (30') wide and located north of the south project boundary and west of the east boundary. A meandering fifteen-foot (15') wide public multi-use trail will run within the fuel modification zone (See Figure 4-34A). The remaining fifteen feet (15') will consist of slopes that will be graded during construction and re-vegetated with hydroseeded native non-inrigated low fuel plant material providing a natural appearance. Zone NO.2 Fuel Modification Zone NO.2 is located witIiiR adjacent to Planning Area 13 along the north boundary of Planning Areas 14, 15, 16, 17, and 19 of the "Valley" (See 19 Rorio8uah Ranch 50ecific Plan. Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES I I Figure 4-34C-1 and 4-34C-2), east of the easterly right of way line of Butterfield Stage Road from North Loop Road to the north project boundary line, the south boundary of Planning Area 8, the south and east boundaries of Planning Area 9A and the south, east and west boundaries of Planning Area 9B. I The fuel modification zone will be a minimum of ORe A~Rsres fifty feet ~(50') wide exteRsiRll ints tAe spen spaGe areas fr-em and primarily contained within the right of way of local streets and Butterfield Stage Road and the planning area boundary lines. The F.ire Marshall has the authority to require additional fuel modification area, on a case-by-case basis, in order to meet the appropriate fuel modification requirements. All areas disturbed by project construction will be re-vegetated with hydroseeded non-irrigated low fuel plant material. All native areas not disturbed by project construction will be thinned out to lessen the fuel load and increase the moisture content of the vegetative biomass. Refer to thinning guidelines below. I I Zone No.3 Fuel Modification Zone NO.3 is located in the "Plateau" along the west and south boundaries of Planning Area 1, the south boundary of Planning Areas 2, 3, and 4A, the south and east boundaries of Planning Area 4B, and the outer edge of the ten foot (10') wide nature trail within Planning Area 7 A ans 713. I I The fuel modification zone will vary in width from a minimum of twenty feet (20') to a maximum of seventy feet (70'). All areas disturbed by project construction will be landscaped and automatically irrigated. Planter material will consist of native fire retardant shrubs and ground covers and will be thinned out to lessen the fuel load and increase the moisture content of the vegetative biomass. Refer to the thinning guidelines below. I I I Thinning Guidelines: . Selectively remove highly flammable plant species. . Selectively thin out large, dense groupings of plant materials. · Remove plant material in a manner that will promote a natural appearance to fuel modification areas. · Alterations to existing plant materials to be in compliance with Sub-Regional Habitat ConselVation Plan (SHCP). I I I I I I I Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 20 December, 2004 ." Gi c :0 m .... ~ '1' - \f;. "-------.I l t' " , .J ,. f ,; ("Plateau") ~ !OI5! ~ mg eeCID @ ~ ~U i ~I ~;~ ~I ~i i i I~ hll~ r -i-~I-I ~ ., !jJ~l':~HV ~~UI~~~ ~g~~ $~~ ill ~" ~i::l ~ ~ ~I;m " ~i jO~ Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan .~ .: , ~I 8 ~: - ~ o .g. '" i:: ~ ~ f 8- . ~ . " ." Gi c: ;u III ... * '" ,(, '" ~ '" ~ o go -u " :;:: .., c ,., r 8f5[ ZOO ,.,- - .., o ~ 5 Z -u r o -u '" Z VI ~ a '" -u " ... '" '" c B~ "'", :x: 0 00 -i:!i::::: Vlno ...~ . a!o ~z VlN ",0 ~~ o " '" Z VI ~ ,., "N ao a - ~~ (J)'" ,., '" o " o rn m o -t 6 z )> ;. rn m o -t 6 z tlI , tlI -u " ~ ~ o go ~ ~ .... 't~ ~", r~ t1J ./:~ "'" I,' /\ r: / y "'-'J') ~ ~ \ .../ ~ i '" . i '" ~ "'.., cc =1'" ,.,r- ill'" -0 "'0 5:91- '!1~ ~ 1;0 ,.,Z "N 00 ~~ ~ , r rn m o -t 6 z o , o rn m o -t 6 z c 6 8 ~: - ~ S; '5' '"' r:: ~ dfIA) ~ ~ t"') ::r- -" ~ o -u '" z VI ~ '" Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan ("Plateau") ." Gi c ;;0 m .... I~ ~ II~I~ Ci)@@ ~ " ~~ ~~ ill ~'!8If i h~ i i~ ~ e~ D.. lGlil<:1lC!!lIIP::"~~ ni!!UiH rhnn1i ~~a~ll~ ~ " ~~ 8 ~: "" ~" >:1 - Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan ("Valley") _.~._ .___ _~. _'~.' _._ ___ m__'_~.'_ ___ .__ ~ g '6' ~ c ~ ~~ ~) ~ ~ ~ .::;,.. . ~ ~ " ." 15 c ;II m ... ~ Cl N '" ...... :E 1 // {" ~1 '" ...... :E ~~ oj", .." '" :!l" ..,0 ,0 o~~ !!l'>!"" ~g ..,z ~N ~~ j; '" "'0 "'''' M '" ! i ~ ~ z ~ '" . ~ i ~;q '< !, I I j; .... r T- ! I .~ I' I } I] at rn m o -l 6 z m , m rn m o -l 6 z -n , -n ~ '" -'" ~ ~ 'i! '" ." 1\ '" N o z " > f .... ~ '" ~ */;, ~ ~ i I ~ ( ~ 1 t rn m o -l 6 z Cl Q rn m o -l 6 z :J: , :J: 8 ~: ~ ~ >5' ~ i:: ~ ~) ~ ~ g.. 1\ / I l \ A f (\ .., ~ o~ s~ \~ 1 ~ '<. f)" m ("Valley") Fuel Modification Zone Master Plan I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10 ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.1 Introduction These design guidelines will be utilized to direct the future physical development of Roripaugh Ranch, an 804.7-acre, mixed-use development currently located in the City of Temecula and the County of Riverside. In order to create a unique community structure, these community guidelines provide a framework for site planning, the architectural theme and landscaping relating to the project. The purpose of these guidelines is to assure a high quality community character and land use compatibility. 4.10.2 Purpose It is the intent of these guidelines to provide direction on a project-wide level as well as a planning area and site-specific level. For example, the guidelines establish criteria at the project level to assure a unified environment, while the planning area and site-specific level individual projects will be required to comply with relevant design standards applicable to each use. Although each project should relate to the overall community design theme, these guidelines are not intended to limit innovative design. The use of these guidelines will serve to direct the overall design of Roripaugh Ranch and assure a high quality community character, appearance and land use compatibility. The City of Temecula city staff, Planning Commission, City Council, and other City decision-making bodies will be providing direction when reviewing development projects within Roripaugh Ranch. These guidelines will also serve as design criteria for use by planners, architects, landscape architects, engineers, builders and future property owners. They will provide a viable framework and clear direction during the development process, without limiting innovative design. The result will be a community with a strong sense of identity, character and cohesiveness. 4.10.3 Residential Architectural Standards 4.10.3.1 Design Groups The intent of these guidelines is to encourage architectural style diversity between the adjacent residential planning areas. Each builder is required to contact the City Planning Department to discuss and review any established facade styles in adjacent Planning Areas so as to assist in the selection of subsequent styles. . Each Planning Area shall be composed of one of the following Exterior Facade Design Groups (Groups A through E) consisting of different Architectural Styles. Within each Residential Planning Area Design Group selected, a minimum of two architectural styles and a maximum of four styles shall be used. Each style as noted in this section shall have a minimum of four-color variations for each Residential Planning Area. No more than four of the same architectural styles may be placed next to one another. Architectural styles within individual Planning Areas shall be compatible and complimentary to each other. Sharp contrasts of architectural styles will not be permitted. . Architectural styles, other than those listed below may be pennitted provided that it can be demonstrated that the quality and intent of the proposed style is consistent with the style and that it can be found to be consistent with the other architectural styles. Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 21 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES Desion Group A (All Planning Areas) I. Classical Revival (See Figure 4-49) II. Spanish Revival (See Figure 4-60) III. Prairie (See Figure 4-59) IV. California Ranch (See Figure 4-48) Desion GrouD B (All Planning Areas) I. Colonial (See Figure 4-50) II. French Cottage (See Figure 4-54) III. East Coast Traditional (See Figure 4-53) IV. Monterey (See Figure 4-58) Desion GrouD C (Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B only) I. Mediterranean (See Figure 4-56) II. American Farmhouse (See Figure 4-47) III. Contemporary Southwest (See Figure 4-51) Desion Group D (Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 33B only) I. Italianate (See Figure 4-55) II. Mission (See Figure 4-57) III. Craftsman (See Figure 4-52) Desion GrouP E (Acceptable for all Planning Areas) One style from each of the above groups. All merchant builders shall submit plans which identity unique aspects of each style to the City for approval that include text, exhibits and any other materials deemed necessary by the City indicating how the proposed residences will conform with the architectural styles shown in the exhibits 4.47-61 listed in Design Groups A through E, and all other design requirements of this chapter. 4.10.3.2 Submittal and Review Requirements The following materials shall be submitted for review and confonnance to the Architectural Guidelines and Specific Plan for the Roripaugh Ranch. The Planning Director may choose to require additional materials for review. . Color elevations of all four sides at scale of y." = 1'. Show materials and colors. Provide dimensions of height and width of major elements. Indicate features that would bring elevation design into compliance with the Architectural Design Guidelines and the specific requirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). . Sections through each elevation at y." = 1 '. Indicate pitch of roof, extent of overhangs, recess of doors and windows and position of trim, trellis and other major architectural features in relation to the primary face of the residence. . Site Plan at 1/8' = 1'. Show, in color and with dimensions the areas and type of paving, area and type of landscaping, fencing, site walls, and other site appurtenances. Indicate how the paving and landscaping is consistent with the Architectural Guidelines and specific requirements of the Design Groups (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Provide by 22 Roricauch Ranch Snecific Plan Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES separate sheet, a matrix indicating the percentage of lot coverage, percentage of impervious paved area and percentage of landscaping. . Provide a color and materials board of a minimal 18" x 18" size. Indicate all colors and materials as shown on the color elevations. Provide one board with one reduced color elevation to indicate conformance with the color variety required by the Architectural Design Guidelines and specific requirements of the Design Group (Figures 4-47 through 4-60). Provide two color sets of the above at the scales indicated including a duplicate set of the color and materials board. In addition, provide six (6) sets of the above in reduced, 11" x 17" black and white format. 4.10.3.3 Architecture Forward and Garage Standards The following standards shall apply to all residential Planning Areas, except as specified: . "Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into 100% of the homes in Planning Areas10, 19, 20, 21, and 33A. "Architectural Forward" concept shall be incorporated into at least 50% of the homes in each of Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A, 48, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 22, 23, 24, and 31. This concept includes advancing the architecture of the living space forward on the lot while concurrently, the garage is held in place or further recessed. Residential dwelling units shall be designed to allow the living portion of the dwelling unit to be "positioned" forward on the lot so that the architecture of the garage will not dominate the street scene. . A variety of garage placement solutions shall be incorporated into the overall design of the homes. Minimum driveway length from the property line to the garage door shall be eighteen feet (18') for front-entry garages in all Planning Areas and ten feet (10') from the property line to the garage edge for side entry garages in the Land LM Districts. Garage solutions that should be incorporated into the overall design are as follows: Shallow Recessed Garaaes (See Figure 4-62) Setting the garage back a minimum of eight feet (8') in relationship to the front of the house. Mid to DeeD Recessed Garaaes (See Figure 4-63) Setting the garage back to the middle or rear of the lot. Third Car Side Loaded (See Figure 4-64) Setting for garage with side-loaded entry, This plan can only occur on larger lots. Side Entrv Garaaes (See Figure 4-65) The use of side entry garages on lots at least 52 feet wide in order to break the continuous view of garage doors along the street scene. Third Car Tandem (See Figure 4-66) Setting for third car tandem garage. Sinale Width Drivewavs (See Figure 4-67) This setting provides a maximum driveway width of twelve (12) feet for adjacent two-car garage. Porte Cochere (See Figure 4-68) Rorioauoh Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment NO.1 23 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES Setting provides for the incorporation of a porte cochere. Rorioauah Ranch Scecific Plan. Amendment No.1 24 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.3.4Streetscene: Design Variation Requirements and Front Yard Landscaping . The front setbacks of both the garage and living space of adjacent buildings shall vary to provide visual interest along street scene. See Figures 4-69A through 4-690. Please refer to Section 5.0, Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance, Table 5-2 for site specific development standards. . Provide visual interest along the street scene, a variety of front entry and side entry garages with varying setbacks shall be utilized. The maximum driveway width at the right-of-way shall be twenty-four (24) feet. Adequate driveway width shall be used onsite to allow for cars to back out of a third-car garage. In no case shall there be an alignment of three garage openings either paired or single doors. . Where possible and appropriate, variable lot sizes may be used to increase selection and variety in house and lot size configurations. . Neighborhoods shall be laid out in a manner which provide connections into the trail and paseo system as illustrated in Figures 4-12,4-13,4-37 and 4-38. . The requirement for one-story products shall be aetermiAed by tl1e market sr as aetermiAea l3y staff as leAll as seme siAllle stery llr-eauGts are requirea iA the siAllle family aelashea _ provided in accordance with Table 2-2 (Proposed Land Uses by Planning Areas (PA). . Architectural styles within individual Planning Areas shall be compatible and complimentary to each other. Sharp contrasts of architectural styles will not be permitted. . Front Yard Landscape and Hardscape: o Within Planning Areas 12,14,15,22 and 31, all lots shall have builder install, HOA maintained front yard landscaping. o Within Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A, 48, 16, 17, 18, 23, and 24 all lots shall have builder install, homeowner maintained front yard landscaping. o Within Planning Areas 10, 19, 20, 21, and 33A all lots shall have builder Ihomeowner installed, homeowner maintained front yard landscaping. o The following shall apply to all Planning Areas: . Front yard landscape shall be a minimum of 50% to 75% lawn with the remaining area devoted to shrubs and ground cover. . No colored rock, gravel or cobblestone shall be used for ground cover. Salt and pepper type granite boulders two to three feet in diameter and thickness may be used as long as they are placed within the landscape in a natural arrangement and accent the overall landscape theme. No more than two to three boulders will be allowed per lot. . Shrub sizes shall be 50% l-gallon and 50% 5-gallon. Quantity shall be one 5-gallon per every 50 square feet and one l-gallon per every 25 square feel of shrub bed area. Shrubs shall be planted to create a unified design theme Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 25 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES and at the base of houses to soften the mass of the structure. . Ground cover shall be rooted, spaced at a minimum of 8 inches on center and a maximum of 18" on center subject to the approval of the City's Landscaped Architect as required by species spacing requirements within the shrub bed area. Ground cover shall be continuous under all shrubs and trees. All shrub beds shall be covered with a two-inch layer of one to three inch appearance grade walk-on bark mulch after installation of ground cover. . A minimum of one tree shall be installed within the front yard landscaping except PAs 10, 19, 20, 21, 33A, and 33B require two trees. These trees shall vary in species from the street tree and shall also vary every third lot in a row. No fewer than four and no more than eight different species of trees shall be used. Minimum size of the trees shall be 24" box. . Street trees shall be planted by the builder along all private streets within all planning areas and shall be installed with the front yard six feet behind the Public Utility Easement. See Figures 4-32 and 4-33. There shall be one street tree per lot for all lots with sixty foot or less front yard widths. All lots with greater front yard widths shall have additional trees installed at a maximum spacing of sixty feet. AI stre.et trees shall be installed at a uniform on center spacing. Comer lots shall have street trees on both street frontages. Street trees may vary in species within a planning area but only one tree species will be allowed per street. Planning areas that are separated by a private street shall have the same street tree on each side of the street. Minimum size of street tree shall be 24" box. Trees shall be installed with root barriers. The Homeowners Association shall maintain all street trees. . All front yard landscape shall be automatically irrigated to provide 100% coverage. Inrigation controllers shall be installed for each lot within the garage portion of the home and shall be connected to the homes electrical system. Shrub beds systems shall be separately valved from lawn systems. . All hardscape (walks and driveways) within the front yard shall be colored concrete with varying textures and score lines, paving stones of various colors with colored concrete borders, flag stone of various sizes and colors with concrete borders or a combination of various textures, shapes, material and colors. Hardscape design shall be uniform within each lot. Please refer to Figures 4-85,4-86,4-87,4-88, and 4-89. . Plans are required to be submitted by the Builder or Homeowner to Ashby USA, LLC for all landscaping and hardscape with the front yards for all planning areas. Plans must be prepared and stamped by a licensed landscape architect registered in the State of California. Ashby USA, LLC shall review plans and if found acceptable they shall be approved. After approval by Ashby USA, LLC all landscape and hardscape plans must be submitted to the City of Temecula for review and approval. All landscape and hardscape must be installed by Builder or Homeowner and approved by Ashby USA, LLC and the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the final for each house. . Side Yard Landscaping for Corner Lot Conditions ROriDBuoh Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment NO.1 26 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES o Corner lot side yards shall have at least two street trees. o At corner lot side yards, shrubs and ground cover shall be provided in accordance with the same standards as front yards. o The responsible parties identified above shall also landscape the parkway adjacent to the comer lots. The landscaping shall include trees, shrubs, and ground cover. 27 Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 December I 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.3.5 Building Elevations A key technique for creating a sense of variety within a project is to val)' the heights and forms of the detached homes as seen from the street as illustrated in Figure 4-70 by utilizing the following: . Within Low and Low Medium density Planning Areas, utilize both one- and two-stol)' buildings. . To improve the visual relationship between adjacent buildings, it is desirable to introduce intermediate transition between them. Use a one-stol)' architectural element within the two- stOI)' building to lessen its apparent height. . Create val)'ing rooflines by maximizing offsets of roof planes. . Units located at street comers (see Figure 4-70), should be either single-stol)' or have a significant one-stol)' mass located towards the exterior side yard Treatment of Mass . Avoid a canyon-like effect between buildings and allow greater light penetration into what otherwise might be dark side-yards. At interior side yards, it is required to create the appearance of increased building separation by stepping the second stOI)' mass away from the property line or any other substantial articulation. . Provide trims around windows, to break up the wall plane. . Avoid long uninterrupted exterior walls. . Val)' the depth of plans to create variations in the building falfade. . Two stOI)' homes shall be modified to be compatible with placement on corner lots. The modification shall create two front elevations. . Surface detail, ornament and architectural elements such as cornices, color contrast, gables' applied moldings, arcades, colonnades, stairways and light fixtures that provide visual interest, shadow, and contrast shall be used to enrich architectural character. Details shall be integrated with the overall design concept. . Val)' the height and roof levels of the building or residence so that it appears to be divided into smaller massing elements. Architectural projections shall be used to achieve this goal. . Articulate building forms and elevations with val)'ing rooflines, roof overhangs and intermediate roof elements to create strong pattems of shade and shadow. Intertockina Mass . Just as stepping the second stOI)' mass improves the side yard, it can be used to improve the front yard scene. As an example, the second stOI)' should be set back in relationship to the garage face or living space below it. . . The designer should envision the building form as a series of interlocking masses rather than a rectangular or "L" shaped box. Therefore achieving a more aesthetic design solution. RoriDauah Ranch $Decific Plan Amendment NO.1 28 December, 2004 I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES Comer Lots I I I . Corner lots shall appear as a second front elevation. Features such as wrap-around porches, outdoor courtyards and front door entries facing the exterior side yard are strongly encouraged for those architectural styles that would support these elements. . One-story mass located towards the exterior side yard shall be incorporated into the design. Articulation of Side and Rear Elevations There is a tendency to have "build out" planes maximized on side and rear yards without articulated treatment of those planes. This results in a two-story stucco effect with no vertical or horizontal relief. Utilize the following techniques or other acceptable techniques to avoid this effect: . Create a single-story plane at the rear by recessing the second story. I I I I . Utilize other similar architectural treatments and designs such as balconies or pop out staircases to encourage relief on potential large architectural planes. . Side and rear elevations shall have articulation with modulated facades, window treatment, second story projections and balconies. . Articulation shall be provided on all sides of the homes ("Four-sided Architecture"). Front Elevations . Architectural projections shall be utilized to emphasize entrances, balconies, and porches. Fronts of houses shall utilize several architectural features. Ground floor windows shall have significant trim or relief, second floor overhangs or built in planters. Second story windows shall have similar treatment to emphasize them. I I I . All residences shall incorporate entry courtyards, covered entries or covered porches at the entry into the design. (See Figure 4-71 and 4-72). . Details shall be concentrated around entrances. Materials used for the front entry shall be distinctive. . Building elements that reflect the architectural style should be incorporated into building entries, windows, front porches, and living areas directly adjacent to the street. I I . Ornamental features including wrought iron and exterior light features shall be combined with other features to create interest in the front of the house with architecturally compatible elements. 4.10.3.6 Architectural Elements I I A successful project design achieves a proper visual balance and sense of cohesiveness. The differences between the plans and elevation must be readily discernable and create variety, yet at the same time elements, styles and materials should not contrast to such an extent as to result in visual chaos. Architectural elements will play a significant role in the establishment of the 29 RoriDauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 December I 2004 I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES I I I architectural style. Architectural elements shall be incorporated into the design of the home and shall not appear as "add-ons" or "tack-ons" to the structure. In addition, specific building elements, to include, but not be limited to the fOllowing shall contribute to the representation of the architectural style: doors, entries, garage doors, chimneys, chimney caps windows, window sills and others. These elements include architectural detailing, colors and materials, and other site structures. The required Architectural and design elements techniques are as follows: Unit Entries (See Figures 4-71 and 4-72) I I I The entry serves several important architectural and psychological functions: it identifies and frames the front doorway; it acts as an interface between the public and private spaces; and it acts as an introduction to the structure while creating an initial impression. . The entry shall be designed and located so as to readily emphasize its prime functions. Accent materials are encouraged to be used to further emphasize the entries. I I I I . If the front door location is not obvious or visible because of building configuration, the entry shall direct and draw the observer in the desired path. The design of the entry area in merchant-built housing shall be strong enough to mitigate the impact of the garage on the facade. . Entry doors and doorways shall be proportional to the architectural style of the structure. . Covered entries, courtyards and porches shall be provided as entry elements. Doors '!!F ~ ; Emphasis shall be placed on the design and type of entry door used. It functions as the major introduction to the interior of the house and concern should be given on the image it creates. . Either single or double doors are appropriate. I I I I I I I . The door shall be covered by an overhead element or recessed a minimum of 3 ft into the wall plane. . The entire door assembly shall be treated as a single design element including surrounding frame, molding and glass sidelights. . Recessed doors may be used to convey the appearance of thick exterior doors. . Wood may be used for the entry door. Wood grain texture and raised or recessed panels contribute to the appeal of the door. Greater use is being made of metal entry doors but in order to be acceptable, they shall possess the same residential "feel" provided by the wood grain and panels. . Doorways shall be typically rectangular or round-headed and fully recessed. Spiral columns, arches, pilaster, stonework, decorative tiles, or other sculptural details shall be integrated into the doorway design to enhance the visual importance of the entry door. . The use of glass in the door and overall assembly is encouraged. It expresses a sense of welcome and human scale. It can be incorporated into the door panels or expressed as single sidelights, double sidelights, transom glass or fan windows. Roricauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment NO.1 30 December I 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES . Flexibility is allowed conceming the color of the door. It may match or contrast the accent trim, but should be differentiated from the wall color. Windows . Typically, the location of windows is determined by the practical consideration of room layout, possible fumiture placement, view opportunities and concem for privacy. Greater design emphasis should be directed to ensure that window placement and organization will positively contribute to the exterior architectural character. Windows greatly enhance the elevation through their vertical or horizontal grouping and coordination with other design elements. This relationship to one another and the wall/roof plane creates a composition and sense of order. . All windows in a specific plan elevation shall be integrated into the architecture of the building. . This should not be interpreted that they are all the same shape, size or type but rather that a hierarchy of windows exists that visually relates and complements one window to another. . Windows shall be recessed to convey the appearance of thick exterior walls. Non-recessed windows shall be surrounded with articulated architectural elements such as wood trim, stucco surrounds, shutters or recessed openings, shutters, pot shelves, ledges, sills plantons, and rails that compliment the architecture. . Merchant-built housing occasionally fails to adequately address proper window design and placement on rear and side elevations. This is usually due to prioritization, maintenance and cost factors. Since side elevations and second story rear windows are frequently visible, greater design effort and budget prioritization need to be given. Garaoe Doors (See Figure 4-73) . Utilizing garage types that compliment the architecture, door designs, and plotting techniques will do much to lessen the repetitious garage doors marching down both sides of a residential street. Variations include: o Employment of second-story feature windows above the garage. o Strong architectural entry elements. o Designs with a mix of 2 and 3 car garages, incorporating three single doors in some three car garage plans not facing the street. o Allowance for a 1 O-foot setback between adjacent garages. o The use of tandem garages may also be incorporated into the building design. o Garage plans with a double door and a single door plan shall not be placed next to each other. . If applicable, where lot width permits plans should include swing-in or side entry garages with reduced front yard setbacks of ten (10) feet. . The design of the garage door shall relate to the ovenill architectural design of the residence. Colors shall be from the same paint palette. Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment NO.1 31 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES . Omamentation of garage doors shall be provided to add visual interest from the street scene. . The use of the sectional, wood or metal, rolling garage door is required since it maximizes the availability of useable driveway length. . Several different panel designs shall be utilized for any project proposed by each merchant builder. Metal doors shall only be used when they include either texture or raised panels of a "residential" nature. The use of window elements is encouraged. . The design of the door face shall result in a treatment which breaks up the expanse of the door plane while being complimentary to the architectural elevation of the residence. Architectural detail consisting of comices, applied molding or trim or applied headers shall be used. There shall be an 8" recess. (See Exhibit 4-73). Rorioauah Ranch SDecific Plan. Amendment NO.1 32 December, 2004 I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES, 4.10.3.7 Residential Roof Fonn I I I I I I I Allowable Roof Pitch (See Figure 4-74) . Allewable reef Jlitshes ef 3:12 te 1:12 shall be ~sell. Allewable reef Jlilshes ever balseRies aReler Jlershes may be 2:12. Roof pitches shall be consistent with the proposed architectural style. . A single roof pitch should be used on opposite sides of a ridge. Shallow pitches tend to lessen the apparent building mass. Roof TVDes The use of different roof types will add variety and interest to the street scene. Changing the roof form on a given plan is the best method of creating altemative elevations. However, the roof characteristics should be consistent with the historical style that is chosen. . Hip, gable and shake-like material shall be used separately or together on the same roof. Avoid a canyon effect in side yards when both buildings have front-to-rear gables, by providing dormer or hip elements. . Repetitious gable ends along rear elevations shall be avoided. Roof forms with pitch changes at a porch or projection are preferable. . Roof forms having dual pitches such as Gambrel or Mansard shall not be used. I I I I I I I . Maximize variations in rooflines by offsetting roof planes and combining single-story elements with two-story elements. Long uninterrupted rooflines should be avoided. Mechanical equipment is not permitted on roofs. DesiQn of Rakes and Eaves . The designer may choose from a variety of rake and eave types based on climatic and stylistic considerations. . . Moderate or extended overhangs are acceptable if proper1y designed. Tight fascia with appropriate style are acceptable. . Single or double fascia boards, exposed rafters, or fascias with planscias when adequately scaled, are acceptable. . Care shall be taken to ensure that material sizes avoid a weak or flimsy appearance. OverhanQ Proiections and Covered Porches . Substantial overhangs are required as a response to solar and climatic conditions. . The inclusion of covered porches and entries are required as par1 of the product mix. They expand sheltered living space, create entry statements and provide elevation/relief. I I I . Rear covered porches may differ from the roof in both pitch and material, but front porches should retain at least one of these two characteristics. Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No.1 33 December I 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES Steppina the Roof Form . Steps in the roof respond to the interior room arrangement and provide visual relief and interest. . A vertical step within the ridgeline should be at least 12" - 18" in order to create visual impact and allow for adequate weatherproofing. Solar Panels (See Figure 4-75) . Solar panels shall be parallel to the roof slope and integrated into the roof design. . The frames shall either match the roof or fascia color. . Support equipment shall be enclosed and screened from view. Rorioauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment NO.1 34 December, 2004 I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.3.8 Accessory Items I I I I I Patio Covers. Trellises Patio covers, trellises, pergolas or similar exterior structures when used shall reflect the character, color and materials of the building to which they are related. . Supports and framing members shall confonm the guideline criteria for columns and posts. . The pitch of the patio roof shall be less than the adjacent building. . Materials of accessory structures are limited to, and compatible with, the dwelling's exterior siding, trim and roof material. Mailbox Structures (See Figure 4-76) Individual and group mailbox structures shall reflect the architecture and the community. This can be either the streetscape theme of the project or individual architectural detailing of the adjacent dwelling. I I I I I I I I I When common mailbox service is provided, their location shall be near either the project entry or recreation facility. Their location shall minimize visual impact while ensuring easy accessibility. Air Conditionina Units (See Figure 4-77) All mechanical equipment should be screened from public view. Further consideration should be given as to air conditioning unit pad placement within the rear yand to minimize impact on yand use and layout. Awninas Canvas awning of solid accent color may be permitted with moderation. Metal awnings are penmitted as long as they match the architecture. The decision to provide awnings shall include consideration of their maintenance and deterioration for projects without maintenance associations. The continuous maintenance of the awning shall be required through the HOA CC & R's to ensure their intended appearance. I I I RoriDauah Ranch Soecific Plan Amendment No 1 35 December, 2004 I I SECTION IV DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.10.3.9 Materials and Colors I I I I I I I I I I I I I I The appropriate selection of materials and colors will produce homes that possess their own individual identity, while remaining compatible with the surrounding residences and contributing to the overall quality of the community. . Exterior Plaster (stucco) is an acceptable exterior building material, with smooth or other light finish texture. Heavy texture is not permitted. . Use of wood, pre-cast concrete, stone/stone veneer, and tile is acceptable, when in conformance with the overall building design. . Exterior surfaces shall have only a limited number of colors, one or two base colors and two or three trim accent colors. . Exterior building materials shall be natural materials which reflect the rural character of the surrounding hillside environment. . Color is intended as a primary theme element of the community consistent with the building materials and compatible with the indigenous elements of the environment. Accents are encouraged which are lighter or darker to highlight the character of the structure. Bright and non-earth tone colors are not permitted except as accents. Roof Material It is neither necessary nor desirable that the community should have a single type or color of roof. Use of a single color or roof type creates a sense of monotony that contributes to a monolithic appearance when viewed from a distance. Clay tile, concrete tile and comparable appearing materials are acceptable roofing materials. Fiberglass and aluminum roofing is prohibited. . Roof colors shall relate to the wall and fascia color. Roofs shall be of a generally neutral tone while avoiding high contrast or blatant colors such as bright red, deep orange, or ceramic blue. Tile roofs shall consist of a blend with one color being more neutral. Medium to strong color contrasts within the blend shall be avoided. Vents shall be of the same color as the surrounding roof surface. I I I 36 Rorioauah Ranch 50ecific Plan Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I Figure 4-47 AMERICAN FARMHOUSE I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I I I I I I I I I Simple 2-stol)' massing 8:12 to 9:12 roof pitch Front to back main gable roof 12' overhangs Architectural quality asphalt shingles or smooth flat concrete tiles Light to medium sand finish stucco Vertical multi-paned windows White vinyl wrap aluminum windows 2 x 4 wood-appearance window and door trim Porches with simple wood columns Covered porches with wood railings Garage door patterns cornplimental)' to style One body color and two accent colors ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS Side elevation gable fonn Main gable roof with one large intersecting gable roof Horizontal siding accents Built up header trims at front windows Shaped wood columns with knee braces Porte-Cochere Three accent colors Notes: 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I , I I I I I I I I I I~- .~ "ll I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-47a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS ~''''''''p' \'~,~ -" :t~~i~ :;;-' 1-:. \ ~.~~:' ~--~i. _~~~ . ;.:.; .d. ~ ~: - _.~.:"../": ....;~-~;.;". '. :,~ '~--;'< .~;~.. . -~:",~~f\~- . ~. ". ..' _ .~...~~ "",'l'>~"._-~..r.~..p/;7,"'''- ~.-:" .. __,~-' ~>.. ~ ~;""' ._'~e~it'l';-,~:~:~<<-~":o' .." - ~.t ~~\J:-~t. " ~.. ",IL ", . ..o......,,ditKi[i<JjI- - .,..l!.. ~_, .,rN~ ",,'M;,-. - . a, ~~~."~ ." ~ ~~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-48 CALIFORNIA RANCH ) ,,~ '; , . ~,' -. m___ -'L -=.::. .:-:..::_......::: ~ ::::f;//['.'"'/,,~ . --.................. - ~,.. ;2f;,,,- ==:: .__ _-::- - ~ \~~ , ~ (fJ!b.:::.:: .____ __ ___,~ . T_,,---- _..--::~ ... -:-. '-:' --=-_':.:::.:... ..,.' '~-W",/~ I( /. /1\, I \.. ~,~, " ;tf-'h-' , ~ t'if)V-4 ..f'-l ,d,;; .-l-: REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . Plan fomn massing with a vertical and an horizontal break . 6:12 to 12:12 roof pttch . 12' to 18' overhangs . Concrete roof tile with shingle look . Front to back gable or hip roof with intersecting hip or gable roofs . Blended stucco and siding . Multi paned windows . Whtte vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Domner shapes facing street ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Full wood porches and or wood balconies . Stone at base of house . Enhanced window and door trim . Garage door patterns complimentary to style (may include windows) . Whtte detailing trims . Porte-Cochere Notes: 1. The arch~ectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I , I .- (--' 1 1 1 1 I I I I'''''.'' , I, '~ I I I I 1 I 1 I.'. . ~, I Figure 4-48a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS L I I Figure 4-49 CLASSIC REVIVAL I I I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I . One to two story construction . Hipped roof or elongated hip with narrow ridge . Roof often has small square hipped dormers . Steep p~ch roof often with Bellcast shape . Rectangular massing with boxy quality . Centered or off-set open half porch . Use of wide classical columns on porch . Average cornice height of 12 feet . Wide bracketed and decorative eaves . Large, imposing entry with wide, heavy doors . Windows are usually individually spaced at regular intervals . Wood clapboard siding or stucco I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS I I I . Ornamental capitals on columns . Victorian-like embellishments in gable . Gabled attic dormer . Doors with sidelights . Porte-Cochere Notes: I 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion ofthe architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. I I 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. . I I I {' I I I I I I I I~\ ___ I I I I I I I I , 1- . I Figure 4-49a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS :;;:t~~'~~ "'. ,;~ '." ~\. ~:m../'$ ~0i.'." ~' .:~;i1i.~~~' I I I I I I I Figure 4-50 COLONIAL REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I . Plan fonn massing and simple roof design . 2-story vertical stacking floors . 4:12 to 6:12 roof pitch . 0" to 12" overhands . Front to back gable roof . Architectural quality wood-appearance or asphalt shingles or smooth flat concrete tiles . Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Vertical multi-paned windows . 2x4 wood window and door trim . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Entry cover porches with simply trimmed wood columns . Garage door patterns complimentary to style . Roundattic Vents and gable ends . One body color and two accent colors . Chimneys located central or at the end of the structure I I I I I I I I I I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Entry door cover . Vertical batten doors . Front to back gable roof with one or two intersecting gable roofs . Blended horizontal siding and stucco . Bay windows . Double layered window and door trim surrounds . Full porches . Shutters and layered header trim at front elevation . Brick accents at first floor . Three accent colors . Porte-Cochere Notes: 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Styie Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I ( II I I I I I I I'~ I I I I I I I ( I- I Figure 4-50a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I I I I Figure 4-51 CONTEMPORARY SOUTHWEST II' . ":f . .. F.. ;... " " ;1,.' '..,\ . ... ~ , . 1 ;" ;I ff r. I I r: I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I . Simple one to three story structures . Flat roof shape, varying heights . Parapet roofs of varying heights . Rounded edges or corners . Deep set windows and doors . Doors and windows flush with wall surface . Divide pane windows . Trellis beam details . Vertical multi-paned windows at front elevations I I I I I I I ADDITIONAL STYLE EL~MENTS . Detail defining entries . Arched covered entries . Stucco columns or posts . Wood columns or posts . Wood trim around doors and windows . Delicate wood molding or accents . Ceramic tile or wrought iron accents . Porte-Cochere Notes:. 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. I I 2. Required and Additional Styie Elements shall appear as an integra' part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I (~ I I I I I I I If, .~ I I I I I I I 1\ I Figure 4-51a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I I Figure 4-52 CRAFTSMAN I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I I I I . Simple 2 story boxed massing . 3 Yz:12 to 4 Yz:12 roof pitch . 18" to 24" overhangs at front elevation . Architectural quality asphalt shingles or shingle texture flat concrete tiles . Basic gable roof side to side . Light to medium sand finish or California Monterey finish . Vertical shaped mullioned windows . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Porches with square columns or posts . Shaped wood appearance header trim at windows and doors . Simple knee braces or outlookers . One body color with two accent colors ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Varied plan shapes Varied porch roof-shed or gabled Stone veneer base accent at column Feature ribbon windows.2 paired or more Full porches with square columns or posts on stone piers Classically styled columns Battered columns Blended stone and brick chimney Decorative beams Porte-cochere . Two body colors . . I I I I . . . . . . . . Notes: I I I 1. The architectural drawing Is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational: it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an arcMecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion oflhe architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional. style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. 1 I I' I I 1 1 I 1 I 1..1.7 I 1 I 1 I I I I I~ I Figure 4-52a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I Figure 4-53 I EAST COAST TRADITIONAL I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I I . Plan form massing with a vertical and an horizontal break . 6:12 to 12:12 roof pitch . 18" to 24" overhangs . Concrete roof tile with shingle look . Front to back gable or hip roof with intersecting hip or gable roofs . Blended stucco and siding, with primary use of siding . Stucco used as an accent material . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Decorative accent windows I I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS I . Full wood porches and or wood balconies . Simplified versions of Colonial cornice trim at gable ends . 2x6 wood windows and door trim . Garage door patterns complimentary to style . Bay windows . Porte-cochere . White detailing trims I I Notes: I 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational: it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying iot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 far a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. I 2. Required and Additional style Elements shall appear as an integral part oflhe home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I I I I I I I I I I I(~ I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-53a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-54 FRENCH COTTAGE C21 "':-4' --.--." '!'~ . REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . Rectangular plan form massing with one offset entry . Main roof hip only . 8:12 to 12:12 roof pitch . Architectural quality wood appearance or elements . Light to medium sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Vertical shaped mullions and simple wood 2x trim at front elevation and at high visibility areas . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Stucco over foam window and door trim . Entry accents with real or faux stone . Entry porches with columns . Garage door patterns to compliment style . One body color with one color accent on front door ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Rectangular plan form massing with porte-cochere . Main roof hip with small dormers or steep 2nd story roof breaking over 1 st story . Asphalt shingles or smooth flat concrete tiles . Bay windows . Full or partial porches with wood-appearance columns . Stone veneer chimney . Wrought iron balconies and pot-shelves . Two accent colors . Porte-cochere Notes: 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational: it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Eievations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part oflhe home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I I I I I I I I I IT~ I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-54a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS -' '.", ;,. ;..,<<...;. ,. ~~i ~'~,(,~ 'prl:,~ !;; I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-55 IT ALlANA TE REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . 2 story massing with one vertical and one horizontal break . Main hip roof with minor intersecting hip roofs . 3 Yz:12 to 4 Yz:12 roof pitch . 24" overhangs, stucco soffits . "SO shaped concrete tiles . Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Vertically hung 9 and 12 paned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas . Often ganged in pairs . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Arched top accent windows ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Tapered round or square simple stucco columns . Shutters . Entry porch . Belt course trim . Mid value saturated colors . Porte-cochere Notes: 1. The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features. The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized uniess the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style. Please see Section 4.10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4.10.3 through 4.10.3.9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors. 2. Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I I I I I I I IT I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-55a J INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS ~'..-'.' -o:p,;'., "" .:, '_' '-'-.::,~~,,"i-' ,}f:jt: --.-- . ,"-1;.. t ::~t-,~;~~~;( ~f~F', i\_ .~ ;'~~"/- e,",,_"'" ,."\.,,'~ .' f,i$'< " ~f~_~:_.~{,~.-. "".,.:"-:';~Y~-, .~ __~.,. -,f..~~ ...!---.-,--" .-...., ~.~.. , ....~~==-,.'J.J' Ed.1 . . . .,>," ' t,.;' - ,~,/'" " ~" ~ .' . -. ;'9' ';"'.~~iT:-._- l. ~w. ~'l~~i;-;'" ", !!r~~~~ l( ... -~ , ..-.J I I Figure 4-56 I I I MEDITERRANEAN I I I I I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . 2 story massing with one vertical and one horizontal break . Main hip roof with minor intersecting hip roofs . 3 Yz:12 to 4 Yz:12 roof pitch . 24" overhangs, stucco soffits . "SO shaped concrete tiles . Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Vertically hung 9 and 12 paned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas . Often ganged in pairs . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Arched top accent windows . Decorative tile accents ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Tapered round or square simple stucco columns . Arched entry porch . Furred out windows . Ceramic or wrought iron accents . Belt course trim . Mid value saturated colors . Porte-Cochere I I Notes: I 1, The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features, The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design, Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style, Please see Section 4,10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4,10,3 through 4,10,3,9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors, I 2, Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ I Figure 4-56a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS '''T~ -~., I Figure 4-57 I MISSION I I I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I . 2 story massing with strong one story element usually containing an arched component . 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch . 12" to 18" overhang . Simple hip or gable roof with one intersecting gable roof . Barrel or "SO shape concrete tiles . Wrought iron accents . Exposed rafter tails . Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Vertically hung 9 and 12 paned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas . Often ganged in pairs . Decorative tile accents I I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS I . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Stucco over foam window and door trim . Arched stucco column porches . Garage door patterns complimentary to style . White tone body with accent trim . Porte-Cochere I Notes: I 1, The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features, The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design, Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all 01 the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style, Please see Section 4,10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4,10,3 through 4,10,3,9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, eievations, roof forms, and materials and colors, I I 2, Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integrai part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I , I I ('- I I I : I I 1 I I I: I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-57a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I I Figure 4-58 I I MONTEREY I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS I . Simple box plan form . Main hip or front to back gable roof front to back at 4:12 to 7:12 and shed roof break over balcony at 3 Yz to 4 Yz:12 roof pitch . 12" to 24" overhangs . Barrel or "SO time roofs . Fine sand stucco finish . Vertical siding accents at gable ends and 2nd floor balcony . Simplified colonial style window and door trim . Decorative tile accents I I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS I I . Full wood porches and or wood balconies with stucco decorative accents . Simplified cornice trim at gable ends . 2x6 wood windows and door trim . Garage door patterns complimentary to style Light colored detailing trims . Porte-Cochere I Notes: I 1, The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and arcMectural features, The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design, Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, ali of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid styie, Please see Section 4,10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4,10,3 through 4,10,3,9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors, I I 2, Required and Additional Style Eiements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'~ "'- I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-58a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS ,~"-.. '~". . ',-~--,. -.;..-.,;;,.:....... Ii 1'0' ("J I' r, _, i;. --: ~ . '~. C I I 'I 1 -. . 1 ~ : I -, t' f;', ,~I'..' ,~b- ~':,~~_" ;o~~~-'-~:.. ~8~~~~ ~-~.:.:' ~',-_ .~"-~ f~,.!..-.~~~~'!..>~~...-..::~ ..., _ A. --.~,~ ~~,J .~--~~. - ~~_....JL 1 jIW'!! ""nl, l . ~:-" , ....-<1' - " ~~-. ..... i t...~ ~>::.-) IW r/~ 8E I Figure 4-59 I PRAIRIE STYLE I I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . 2 story massing with horizontal design elements with one story elements Hip roof design with boxed stucco soffits 3 Yz:12 to 4 Yz:12 roof pitch 24" overhangs, stucco soffits Smooth flat concrete tiles Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco Vertical windows at first floor and accent horizontal windows at 2nd floor along belt course White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . . I . . . I . . I ADDITIONAL STYLE ELEMENTS I . Broad flat chimney with brick cap detail . Covered entry with stucco or wood columns, Columns may have stone on base . Wide range of light earth tones and contrasting trim . Porte-Cochere I Notes: I 1, The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features, The drawing is meant to be inspirational; it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design. Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not lead to creating an architecturally valid style, Please see Section 4,10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4,10,3 through 4,10,3,9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors, I 2, Required and Additional style Elements shall appear as an integral part oflhe home, rather than a tack- on feature. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I~ ~ I I I I I I I I I Figure 4-59a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTOS I I Figure 4-60 I I I SPANISH REVIVAL I I I I I I I I I I I REQUIRED STYLE CORE ELEMENTS . 2 story massing with strong one story element usually containing an arched component . 4:12 to 5:12 roof pitch . 12: to 18" overhang . Simple hip or gable roof with one intersecting gable roof . Barrel or "SO shape concrete tiles . Fine to light sand finish or light lace finish stucco . Arched windows . Vertically hung 9 and 12 paned windows at front elevation and in high visibility areas . Often ganged in pairs . Decorative wrought iron trim details . Exposed beam headers ADDITONAL STYLE ELEMENTS . Furred out windows . White vinyl wrap aluminum windows . Stucco over foam window and door trim . Arched stucco column porches . White tone body with light accent trim . Ceramic tile accents . Porte,Cochere Notes: I I I 1, The architectural drawing is intended to demonstrate a style and architectural features, The drawing is meant to be inspirational: it is not meant to be replicated or construed as a rigid formula for design, Elevations may be modified, when necessary, to accommodate for varying lot sizes, widths, and depths; however, all of the Required Style Elements shall be utilized unless the Director determines they are inappropriate or do not iead to creating an architecturally valid style, Please see Section 4,10 Architectural Design Guidelines, specifically Sections 4,10,3 through 4,10,3,9 for a detailed discussion of the architectural standards, design groups, elevations, roof forms, and materials and colors, 2, Required and Additional Style Elements shall appear as an integral part of the home, rather than a tack- on feature, I I ( I I I I I I I I~ I I I I I I I I'~ I Figure 4-60a INSPIRATIONAL PHOTO I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE OVERVIEW Section V of the Specific Plan Amendment Addendum contains the Amended Specific Plan Zoning Ordinance, Standards have been added the Low Density Estates (L-E) for Planning Area 10 and allowing single-family detached units in Planning Areas 12, 14 and 15. Table 5,1 (Schedule of Permitted Uses- Residential Districts) has been expanded to include the L-E designation. Table 5,2-1 (Accessory Structures Setbacks) and Table 5.2-2 (Maximum Encroachments into Required Yard Areas) have been added, 5.1 PURPOSE AND INTENT The zoning for the Specific Plan area is Specific Plan Overlay, This section of the Specific Plan establishes zoning districts and land use regulations and standards that will control land use and development in the land uses identified for the Specific Plan area, These regulations amend and supersede the regulations of the Temecula Development Code, Where standards and regulations are not specified in this Specific Plan, the requirements of the Temecula Development Code shall provide the regulatory authority. This section also identifies the procedures to be used to review site plans for development projects proposed within the Specific Plan area, Special standards for residential development are also included here. The Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines in Section 4,0 are intended to be used in conjunction with the zoning and development standards stated here. The following standards will serve as the primary mechanism for implementation of the land uses for the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. These regulations provide an appropriate amount of flexibility to ~nticipate future needs and to achieve compatibility between land uses. Principal land uses for the Specific Plan shall be as follows: 1, Residential Land Uses: . Low Density (L) Single-Family Detached: (PA.w, 19, 20, 21, 33A and 338) . Low Density Estates (L-E) Single-Family Detached (PA10) . Low Medium (LM) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA lA-4B, 16 -18) . Medium (Ml) Density Single-Family Detached: (PA 23 and 24) . Medium (M2) Density Single-Family Detached aml Jl.ttasheE! slystemE!: (PA 12, 14,and 15, 22 aRE! al) , . Medium (M2) Density Attached clustered: (PA 22 and 31) 2, Commercial: . Neighborhood Commercial: (PA 11) 3, Parks and Open Space: . Private Recreation Centers (PA 5, 30) . Private Mini-Park (PA 1 B) . Parks (PA 6, 27) . Open Space . Habitat (051): (PA 8, 9A, 9B, and 13) . Flood Control (052): (PA +8, 7C, 25, 26, and portions of 14 and 27) . Landscape Slope (053): (PA 7A and portion of 6) 4, Elementary and Middle School: (PA: 28 and 29) 5, ,Fire Station: (PA 32) 37 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V . SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.2 GENERAL PROVISIONS This section of the development regulations states the general rules that must be observed by all development projects in order to protect the public health, safely and welfare, These regulations apply to all planning areas within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, unless otherwise specified, 1, Roripaugh Ranch Site Planning and Architectural Design Guidelines All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area is subject to the policy provisions of the Site Planning (Section 4,0) and Architectural Design Guidelines (Section 4,0) adopted by ordinance ofthe Temecula City Council. The Design Guidelines in conjunction with the development standards contained in this Specific Plan and those of the Temecula Development Code shall regulate development within the Specific Plan area, The Design Guidelines will be administered through the City of Temecula Planning Department. All development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall be subject to the Development Standards in this section of the Specific Plan, 2, Code Compliance All construction and development within the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan area shall comply with applicable provisions of the Specific Plan, the Uniform Building Code and the various related mechanical, electrical, plumbing and fire codes, water ordinance, grading and excavation codes and subdivision codes, in effect in the City of Temecula at the time grading/building permits are obtained, 3, Setback Requirements The setback requirements are as specified within the standards identified in the plan for each zoning district. If not otherwise specified, all setbacks shall be determined as the perpendicular distance from the existing or planned street right-of-way line or property line, to the foundation point of the closest structure, 4, Exceptions If specific development standards have not been established or if an issue, condition or situation arises or occurs that is not clearly understandable in the Specific Plan, then those regulations and standards of the City of Temecula Development Code that are applicable for the most similar use, condition or situation shall apply as determined by the Community Development Director. 5, Enforcement Enforcement of the provisions herein shall be in the manner specified in the Temecula Municipal Code for zoning enforcement. 6, Unspecified Uses Whenever a use has not specifically been listed as being a permitted use in a particular zone classification within the Specific Plan, it shall be the duty of the Planning Director to determine if said use is: (1) consistent with the intent of the zone; and (2) compatible with other listed permitted uses, Any person aggrieved by the decision may appeal to the Planning Commission. 38 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan provides a mix of diverse housing products, including five different housing types that fall within three of the City's General Plan residential designations: Specific Plan Desianation Temecula General Plan Residential Desianation L (20,000 sq. ft,) Single-Family (1-2 du/ac) Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 du/ac) , L-E (10,000 sq. ft.) Single-Family (1-2 du/ac) Low Density Residential Single-Family (.5-2 du/ac) LM (5,000 and 6,000) Single-Family (2-5 du/ac) (Min, 5,000 sf lot size) Low Medium Density Residential Single-Family (3-6 du/ac) Ml and M2 (4,000 and NA) Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) Ml: Min. (standard) 4,000 sf lot size M2: Min, (clustered) 3,999 sf let size fer aetasRed M2: Min, (attached) 3,000 sf lot size Medium Density Residential Single-Family (7-12 du/ac) 39 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.1 DESCRIPTION OF RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (L) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. W. 19, 20, 21, 33A AND 338 The Low Density Residential (L) zoning district is intended to'provide for the development of single- family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical lot sizes in the L zoning district will be a minimum of 20,000 square feet with 1 acre minimum lots along the exterior perimeter of Planning Areas 19, 20, 21, and 33A, Private equestrian use will only be allowed on lots one acre or larger adjacent to the multi-use trail in Planning Areas 19, 20, 21, Planning Area 33B shall not be developed as a part of Roripaugh Ranch. This planning area shall eventually be combined with the adjacent residential areas to the north, LOW DENSITY ESTATES RESIDENTIAL (L-E) - PLANNING AREA NO. 10 The Low Density Estates Residential (L-E) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family detached homes on large lots with a unique character of development. Typical lot sizes in the L-E zoning district will be a minimum of 10,000 square feet. LOW MEDIUM DENSITY (LM) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 1A, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, 16, 17 and 18 The Low Medium (LM) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of single-family' homes on lots of 5,000 square feet to 6,000 square feet. Planning Areas 1, 2, 3, 4A, 4B, and 16 shall have a minimum lot size of 5,000 sq, ft, Planning Areas 17 and 18 shall have a minimum lot size of 6,000 sq, ft, MEDIUM DENSITY - STANDARD (M1) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 23 AND 24 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide forthe development of single-family homes on lots 4,000 minimum square feet. MEDIUM DENSITY - DETACHED OR CLUSTERED (M2) - PLANNING AREAS NOS. 12, 14, 15, 22 AND 31 The Medium (M) zoning district is intended to provide for the development of detached or clustered single-family development on minimum lot sizes of 3,000 sq, ft, Planning Areas 12,14and 15 will be allowed to have the option of clustered or detached units. Planning Areas 22 and 31 shall contain clustered units. 40 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I 5.3.2 USE REGULATIONS I I The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the residential zoning districts as indicated in the columns corresponding to each residential zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "Po, the use shall be a permitted use, Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone, Where indicated with a letter "CO, the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. I Table 5.1 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Residential Districts Description of Use L L-E LM M1 M2 Single-family detached p P P P p. Single-family attached - - - - p Single-family zero lot line - - - p p Single-family attached greater than two units - - - - - Multiple family - - - - - Manufactured homes p P P P P Mobilehome park - - - - - Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent P P P P P or neglected children (six or fewer) Facilities for the mentally disordered, handicapped, or dependent - - - - - or neglected children (seven to twelve) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (six or P P P P P fewer) Alcoholism or drug abuse recovery or treatment facility (seven or - - - - - more) Residential care facilities for the elderly (six or fewer) P P P P P Residential care facilities for the elderty (seven or more) - - - - - Congregate care residential facilities for the elderly - - - - - Boarding, rooming and lodging facilities - - - - - Secondary dwelling units as defined by City Development Code P P P - - Granny Flat p P P - - Family day care homes-small (four or fewer) P P P P P Family day care homes-large' C C C - - Day care centers C C C - - Bed and breakfast establishments - - - - - Emergency she~ers - - - - - 41 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE , , Description of Use L L-E LM M1 M2 Transitional housing - - - - - Nonresidential Agricu~uraVopen space uses - - - - - Religious institutions' C C C C C Utility facilities C C C C C Educational institutions - - - , - Public libraries - - - - - Public museums and art galleries (not for profrt) - - - - - Kennels and catteries - - - - - Non commercial keeping of horses p, p - - - Temporary real estate tract offices P p P P P Recreational Vehicle Storage Yards - - - - - Parking for commercial uses - - - - - Nonprofit clubs and lodge halls - - - - - Convalescent facilities - - - - - Go~ Cou rses - - - - - Home occupations P p P P P Construction Trailers' p P P P P 1, A CUP processed for large family day care homes is subject to Health and Safety CocIe Section 1597.46(a)(3). In accordance therewith, notice of the application being filed shall be mailed to surrounding property owners within one hundred feet only and the notice shall indicate that unless a request for a hearing is made by such surrounding property owner or other "affected person". the CUP will issue within twenty days of the notice. If a hearing is requested, the planning department shall schedule such hearing within thirty days of the request and the hearing shall be held within thirty days of being scheduled. Allowed only within a single-family residence. The Planning Director shall have the discretion to waive submittal of an Administrative Development Plan if it is determined that the construction trailer will not have an adverse impact on adjacent residences or businesses. The keeping of horses shall only be permitted in Planning Areas 19, 20 and 21 on lots abutting the multi-use trail. No more than two (2) horses and one (1) offspring up to six (6) months of age may be kept on each one acre lot. All harses shall be kept in a stall/coral (12' x 12' for each horse) located a minimum distance of fifty (SO) feet tram neighboring dwellings, ten (10) feet trom the main dwelling on the lot and ten (10) teet from the side ar rear property line. Religious institutions shall not be permitted in Planning Areas 1A, 2, 3, 4A and 4B. Planning Areas 121 14 and 15 will be allowed to have the option of clustered or detached units. Planning Areas 22 and 31 shall contain clustered units. 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. 42 Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In the Low (L), Low Estates (L-E) Low Medium (LM) and Medium (M) Zones are as follows: Table 5.2 Development Standards - Residential Districts , Residential Development L L-E LM LM M1 M2 Standards 20,000 10,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 (Minimum Lot Size in Feet) Planning Area W, 19, 20, 10 1A,2,3, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12,14,15, 21, 33A 4A,48 22 and 31 and 338 and 16 Minimum gross lot area (square 20,000 10,000 5,000 6,000 4,000 3,000 feet) 1 acre. -* Lots in PA 19, 20 and 21 that abut eastern and southern property boundary shall be a minimum of 1 acre, Thirty (30) foot fuel modification zone shall not be included in lot area, Lots along the western perimeter of PA 33A & 338 shall be a minimum of 1 acre, Dwelling units per net acre 1,2 du/ac 1.7 du/ac 5,2 du/ac 4,0 du/ac 6,1 du/ac 10,1 du/ac , Minimum lot frontage at front 30ft, 25ft 25ft, 25ft, 25ft, NA properlv line Minimum lot frontage for a flag lot 25ft, 20ft 20ft, 20ft, 20ft, NA at front property line Minimum width at required front 50ft, 40ft 40ft, 40ft. 40ft, NA vard setback area Minimum lot width 60ft.* SOft 40ft, 40ft, 40ft, 40ft, * The lot width for both 20,000 sq, ft. lots and 1 acre lots shall be substantially the same, Minimum lot depth 90ft, 80ft 80ft, 80ft, 80ft, NA Minimum front yard setback 25ft, 20 ft 10ft 10ft, 10ft, 10ft, - Front entry 18 ft, 18 ft 18ft, 18ft, 18ft, 18ft, - Side entry garages 10ft, 10ft 10ft, 10ft, 10ft, 10ft, - Lots abutting Murrieta Hot Springs between pourroy Rd, and the MWD easement may be reduced by three (3) feet Milllm~m corner side yard 15ft, 15 ft 15ft, 15ft. 15ft, 15ft, 'se ae Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage; based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 43 RoripaUQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Residential Development L L-E LM LM Ml M2 Standards 20,000 10,000 ' 5,000 6,000 (Standard) (Clu6tered) (Minimum Lot Size in Feet) 4,000 Planning Area .w, 19, 20, 10 1,2,3,4A, 17 and 18 23 and 24 12,14,15, 21,33A 48 and 16 22 and 31 and 338 *Minimum interior side yard 10ft, 10 ft. 5ft, 5ft, 5ft, 3ft, setback Minimum rear yard setback 20ft, 20 ft. 20ft, 20ft, 15ft, 15ft, front - Setbacks for lots abutting - - 25ft, - - loaded Planning Area 7 A along the garage southern property line shall have a 25' minimum rear yard setback, - Lots abutting Multi-use trail in - - - PA 19, 20 and 21, 5 ft, rear - Setbacks for lots abutting 50ft, SOft. loaded Murrieta Hot Springs between Pourroy Rd, and the MWD garage easement may be reduced by staff by three (3) feet Minimum Rear Yard Setbacks - - Deep Recessed 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. 5ft. - Rear Access - - 3ft. 3ft. 3ft. 3ft. Maximum height 2 stories, 2 stories, 2 stories, 2% 2 Ih stories, 2 Ih stories, 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet stories, 35 35 feet 35 feet feet Maximum percentage of lot 50% 50% 60% 60% 60% 60% coverage Minimum Garage Size (interior 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' 20' x 20' space) . Fireplaces may project not more than two (2) feet into the side yard setback provided the width of the fireplace does not exceed eight (8) feet in width. Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 44 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan. Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.4 ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following development standards shall apply to all residential developments in all ofllle residential districts within the Specific Plan. In the event of a discrepancy or ambiguity of these standards, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to determine the appropriate standard on a case-by-case basis. Table 5.2-1 Accessory Structures Setbacks I Front II Rear II Side I Accessory Minimum Distance to Front Minimum Distance to Rear Minimum Distance to Side Structu re Property Line Property Line Property Line' Detached second Not permitted in the actual Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side yard unie.41 front yard setbacks in Table 17 .06.040 setbacks in Table 17.06,040 of the Temecula Development of the Temecula Development Code Code Detached granny Not permitted in the actual Refer to the rear yard Refer to the side yard flat" front yard setbacks in Table 17.06.040 setbacks in Table 17.06.040 of the Temecula Development oflhe Temecula Development Code Code Garage 20 ft. 0 in. (Entrance faces 5 ft. min. but no less than 15 5ft.min. I street) ft.from 10 ft. 0 in. (If Entrance from centerline of alley side not facing front yard) Storage/utility Not permitted 3ft. 3ft. I Enclosure Iswimming pool' Not permitted 5ft. 5ft. I Swimming pool Not permitted 3ft. 3ft. I Equipment ISpa Not permitted 3ft. 3ft. I IAntennas Not permitted 5ft. 5ft. I Gazebo/garden Not permitted 5ft. 5 ft. (10 ft. if a corner lot) , I structure ISolar collector II Not permitted in front yard 3ft.0 in. 3ft. 0 in, I I Decks II Not permitted 5ft. min. 5ft. min. I Patio covers I 15 ft. II 5ft. min. 5ft.min, I measured at vertical supports IRoof deck II Must meet district standards I 1. On a corner lot, accessory structures are not permitted unless otherwise noted above. 2. Accessory structures with walls must be separated from other accessory and primary structures by at least six feet 3. Second units and granny flats that are attached to the main structure shall comply with the setback and yard requirements contained in Table 5.2. 4. Not permitted in the M1 and M2 zones. Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 45 RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No:1 December I 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.3.5 YARD ENCROACHMENT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following development standards shall apply to all residential developments in all of the residential districts within the specific Plan. In the event of a discrepancy or ambiguity of these standards, the Director of Planning shall have the authority to determine the appropriate standard on a case-by-case basis. Table 5.2-2 Maximum Encroachments into Required Yard Areas \ \1 Maximum Encroachments into \ Yard Area Item Front II Rear II Side' I Architectural features (such as wall projections, \ 2ft. II 2ft. II 2ft. \ eaves, overhangs, extensions, decorative materials and artwork). Awning or canopy (with no vertical supports) 4 ft. 0 in. 4 ft. 0 in. 3ft. 0 in. Awning or canopy (with vertical supports measured 6 ft. 0 in. 6 ft. 0 in, 3ft. 0 in. at vertical supports). IBalconies or stairways II 3 ft. 6 in. II 3 ft. 6 in. II 3 ft. 6 in. I IBay windows II 2 ft. 6 in. II 2 ft. 6 in. ' II 2ft. 6 in, I IChimneys and air conditioning units II 2ft. 0 in. II 2 ft. 6 in, II 2ft. 6 in. I !Porch II 6ft. 0 in. II 3 ft. 0 in. II 3ft. 0 in. I IStairway landings II 6ft. 0 in. II 6 ft. 0 in. II 3ft. 6 in, I 1. On a corner lot, projections permitted in a front yard setback also apply to a street side yard. 2. The deck and its railing shall not exceed the buildin9 height limit for the applicable zoning district Note: Setbacks for structures located adjacent to the Fuel Modification Zones shall be determined at the Tentative Map stage, based on the criteria provided by the City Fire and Planning Departments. 46 Roripaugh Ranch specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL (PLANNING AREA 11) I I 5.4.1 DESCRIPTION OF NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL Neighborhood Commercial (Planning Area No, 11), will include a variety of different types of land uses, Uses within this planning area include smaller-scale business activities which generally provide retail and/or convenience services for residents within Roripaugh Ranch, The following are site planning guidelines relating to Planning Area No,ll, 5.4.2 USE REGULATIONS I I The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in the neighborhood commercial zoning district. Where indicated with a ietter "p., the use shall be a permitted use, Where indicated with a . -", the use is prohibited within the zone, Where indicated with a letter "C", the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit, I Table 5-3 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Neighborhood Commercial Center (PA-11) Description of Use NC A Adu~ business subject to Chapter 5,08 of the Temecula Municipal Code - AerobicsldanceJgymnastics~azzercise/martial arts studios (less than 5,000 sq, It, P Aerobicsldance/gymnasticsljazzercise/martial arts studios (greater than 5,000 sq, It, P Alcoholism or drug treatment facilities , - Alcohol and drug treatment (outpatient) - Alcoholic beverage sales C Ambulance services - Animal hospitaVshelter - Antique restoration - Antique sales (Less than 5,000 sq, It,) P Apparel and accessory shops P , Appliance sales and repairs (household and small appliances) P Arcades (pin bail and video games) - Art su pply stores P Auction houses - Auditoriums and conference facilities C Automobile dealers (new and used) - Automobile sales (brokerage)- showroom only (new and used)-no outdoor display - Automobile repair services - Automobile rental - I I I I I I I I I I I I 47 RoripauQ'h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December r 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE - Automobile painting and body shop Automobile service stations with alcoholic sales - Automotive seNice stations (not selling beer and/or wine) with or without an automated P car wash Automobile parts-sales C Automobile oil changeAube services with no major repair C B Bakery goods distribution - Bakery retail p Bakery Wholesale , Banks and financial institutions p Barber and beauty shops p Bed and breakfast - Bicycle (sales, rentals, services) p Billiard parior/poolhall - Binding of books and similar publications - Blood bank p Blueprint and duplicating and copy services p Bookstores p Building materials sales (with the exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent of - total sales area) Buiiding materials sales (with the exterior storage/sales areas greater than 50 percent of - total sales area) Butcher shop p C Cabinet shop - Cabinet shops under 20,000 sq, It,- no outdoor storage - Camera shop (sales/minor repairs) p Candy/confectionery sales p Car wash, full service/seW service - Carpet and rug cleaning - Catering services p Clothing sales p 48 Roripau!1h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December I 2004 I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I Coins, purchase and sales p Communications and microwave installations 1 - Communications equipment sales 1 C Community care facilities C Computer sales and services p Congregate care housing for the elderly 2 C Construction equipment sales, services or rental - Contractor's equipment, sales, service or rental - Convenience market - Costume rentals p Crematoriums - Cutiery p 0 Data processing equipment and systems - Day care centers p Delicatessen p DiscounVdepartment store p Distribution facility - Drug store/pharmacy p Dry cleaners p Dry cleaning plant - E , Emergency she~er - Equipment sales and rentals (no outdoor storage) p Equipment sales and rentais (outdoor storage) - F , Feed and grain sales - Financial, insurance, real estate offices p Fire and pOlice stations p Floor covering sales p Florist shop p Food processing - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 49 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Fortunetelling, spiritualism, or similar activity p Freight terminals - Fuel storage and distribution - Funeral parlors, mortuary - Furniture sales (Less than 10,000 sq, It,) p Furniture transfer and storage - G Garden supplies and eqUipment sales and service - Gas distribution, meter and control station - General merchandise/retail stores less than 10,000 sq, It, p Glass and mirrors, retail sales p Government offices p Grocery store, retail p Grocery store, wholesale - Guns and firearm sales - H Hardware stores p Health and exercise club p Heatth food store p Health care facility p Heliport - Hobby supply shop p Home and business maintenance service - Hospitals - Hotels/motels - I Ice cream parlor p Impound yard - Interior decorating service p J Junk or salvage yard . 50 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I K Kennel - L Laboratories, film, medical, research or testing centers - Laundromat p Laundry service (commercial) - Libraries, museums, and galleries (private) C Liquid petroleum, sales and distribution - Liquor stores C Lithographic service - , -c- Locksmith p M Machine shop - Machinery storage yard - Mail order business p Manufacturing of products similar to, but not limited to the following: Custom-made product, processing, assembling, packaging, and fabrication of goods, within enclosed building (no outside storage), such as jewelry, furniture, art objects, clothing, labor intensive manufacturing, assembling, and repair processes which do nor involve frequent truck traffic, ,Compounding of materials, processing, assembiing, packaging, treatment or fabrication of materials and products which require frequent truck activity or the transfer of heavy or bulky - items, Wholesaling, storage, and warehousing within enclosed building, freight handling, shipping, truck services and terminals, storage and wholesaling from the premises of unrefined, raw or semi-refined products requiring further processing and manufacturing, and outside storage, Uses under 20,000 sq, It, with no outside storage Massage 3 p Medical equipment sales/rental p Membership clubs, organizations, lodges C Mini-storage or mini-warehouse facilities - Mobilehome sales and services - Motion picture studio - Motorcycle sales and service - Movie theaters C I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 51 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December I 2004 I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE I Musical and recording studio - N Nightclubsltavernslbars/dance clublteen club - Nurseries (retail) - Nursing homes/convalescent homes C 0 Office equipment supplies, sales/services P Offices, administrative or corporate headquarters with greater than 50,000 sq, It, - Offices, professional services with less than 50,000 sq, It" but not limited to, business law, P medical, dental, veterinarian, chiropractic, architectural, engineering, real estate, insurance p Paint and wallpaper stores P Parcel delivery services - Parking lots and parking structures C Pawnshop - Personal service shops P - Pest control services Pet grooming/pet shop , P Photographic studio P Plumbing supply yard (enclosed or unenclosed) - Postal distribution - Postal services p Printing and publishing (newspapers, periodicals, books, etc,,) - Private utility facilities (Regulated by the Public Utilities Commission) P Q Reserved - R Radio and broadcasting studios, offices - Radioltelevision transmitter , - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Roripau!1h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 52 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Recreational vehicle parks - Recreational vehicle sales - Recreational vehicle, trailer, and boat storage within an enclosed buildin9 - Recycling collection facilities p Recyclin9 processing facilities - Religious institution, without a daycare or private school C Religious institution, with a private school C Religious institution, with a daycare C Restaurant, drive-inlfast food C Restaurants and other eating establishments p Restaurants with lounge or live entertainment C Rooming and boarding houses - S Scale, public - Schools, business and professional C Schools, private (kindergarten through Grade 12) C Scientific research and development offices and laboratories . Solid waste disposal facility - Sports and recreational facilities C Swap meet, entirely inside a permanent building - Swap meet, outdoor - Swimming pool supplies/equipment sales p T Tailor shop p Taxi or limousine service . Tire sales - Tobacco shop p Tool and die casting - Transfer, moving and storage , " Transportation terminals and stations C Truck sales/rentals/service , , TVNCR repair p Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 53 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE U Upholstery shop - V Vending machine sales and services - W Warehousing/distribution - Watch repair p Wedding chapeis - Weiding shop - Welding supply and service (enclosed) - y Reserved - Z Reserved - 1. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 17.40 of the City of Temecula Development Code. 2. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 17.06.050.H of the City of Temecula Development Code. 3. Subject to the provisions contained in Section 5.22 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code. 54 Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.4.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The following standards of development shaU apply in the Neighborhood Commercial: Table 5-4 Development Standards - Neighborhood Commercial (Commercial Uses - PA 11) Minimum gross area for site 2 acres for common lot centers, 30,000 square feet for single lots Target floor area ratio, ,3 Maximum floor area ratio with intensity bonus as per Section 17,08,050 ,50 Front yard adjacent to street: - Butterfield Stage RoadlMurrieta Hot Springs Road 20 feet; structure & parking - "A" and "B" Street 20 feet, structure & parking Yard adjacent to residentially zoned property 25 feet, structure & parking Accessory structure side/rear yard setback 10 feet Minimum building separation: - One story: 10 feet - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stories or more: 20 feet Maximum building height 50 feet Maximum percent of lot coverage 30% Minimum required landscaped open space 20% Fence, wall or hedge screening outdoor storage maximum height 6 feet Minimum buiiding setback separation: - Two stories: 15 feet - Three stories or more: 20 feet RoripauQh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 55 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5 PARKS AND OPEN SPACE (Planning Areas Nos.1B, 5, 6, 7A,18, 7e, 8, 9A, 9B, 13, 27, 25, 26 and 30) 5.5.1 DESCRIPTION OF PARKS AND OPEN SPACE Parks (P) and Open Space (OS) zoning district is intended to promote a wide range of public and private recreational uses in the community. These uses include community facilities, golf courses, health clubs, public parks and recreation areas, sports parks, or other outdoor athletic facilities and similar outdoor commercial recreational uses, 5.5.2 USE REGULATIONS The list of land uses in the following table shall be permitted in one or more of the park and open space zoning district as indicated in the columns corresponding to each zoning district. Where indicated with a letter "P", the use shall be a permitted use, Where indicated with a "-", the use is prohibited within the zone. Where indicated with a letter "C", the use shall be conditionally permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Table 5-5 Schedule of Permitted Uses - Parks and Recreational Uses Schedule of Uses P P OS, OS2 053 (Private) (Public) Planning Area lB,5 6 and 27 8,9A, +B, 7C, Portions and 30 9B, and 25 and of 6 and 13, 26 7A Agricultural Uses - - - - - Athletic Field P P - - - Bicycle paths P P - P P Campground - - - - - Caretakers quarters - - - - - Cemeteries, mausoleums and related uses - - - - - Game courts, badminton, tennis, racquetball P P - - - Golf driving range not part of a go~ course - - - , - Go~ course and clubhouse P P - - - Government and public utility facilities C C P P - Gymnasium ' , P P - - - Microwave antennaltower1 - - - - - Nature centers/exhibits - - - - - Nurseries - - - - - Group Picnic Facilities P P - - - 56 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE Private parks and recreation facilities P p - P P Parking areas p p - - - Public parks and recreational facilities P P - P P Recreational vehicle park - - - - - Riding stable, public or private - - - - . Shooting galleries, ranges, archery courses - - - - - Singie-family dwellings - - , - - Tree Farms - - . - - 1, See Zoning Appendix of Development Code 17.40 for antenna information, Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 57 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.5.3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS In the Parks and Open Space districts development standards are as follows: Table 5-6 Development Standards. Parks and Open Space Standards Development Standards p OS Planning Area 18,5,6,27 and 7 A, 7B, 7C, 8, 31 9A, 98, 13, 25 and 26 , Minimum lot size 10,000 sq, It, - Maximum lot coverage 25% - Maximum height 35feet' - Floor area ratio ,1 - , Setback for parking areas and structure~ 25 feet - Minimum open spaceAandscaping 75% 100% 1. Excludes light poles and communication facilities. 58 Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.6 PUBLIC/INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICTS (PLANNING AREAS 28 AND 29) 5.6,1 DESCRIPTION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT AND PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL DISTRICT The purpose of this district is to facilitate the construction of an Elementary School site and Middle School site, Planning Area 28 will be developed as a Middle School site and Planning Area 29 will be developed as an Elementary School site, 5.6.2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Areas 28 and 29 shall only be designated to be used as a Middle School site and an Elementary School site, respectively, 59 Roripau~h Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.7 PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL (PLANNING AREA 32) 5.7.1 DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC INSTITUTIONAL (FIRE STATION) The purpose of this district is to facilitate construction of public and quasi-public uses in appropriate areas of the city, Planning Area 32 will be developed as a fire station on a l,5-acre site. 5.7.2 USE REGULATIONS Planning Area 32 shall only be designated as a Fire Station, 60 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment NO.1 December, 2004 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I SECTION V SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING ORDINANCE 5.8 PARKING REQUIREMENTS Refer to Chapter 17.24 of the City Development Code for parking requirements, 61 Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan, Amendment No.1 December, 2004 EXHIBIT B, ATTACHMENT 5A R:\S P A\2004\04'0371, Roripaugh Ranch,1\CC DA Amend Draft Ordinance,doc 5 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: City ofTemecula 43200 Business Park Drive P.O. Box 9033 Temecula, California 92589-9033 Attn: City Clerk Exempt from recording rees pursuant to Govt, Code Section 27383 (Space above for recorder's use) FIRST AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND ASHBY USA. LLC (RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN) This First Amendment to Development Agreement is made and entered into as of January 11, 2005, by and between the CITY OF TEMECULA, a California municipal corporation ("City"), ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company, DAVIDSON = RORlP AUGH RANCH 122, LC, SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, RORIAPAUGH RANCH 100, LP: GRIFFIN COMMUNITIES, RORlPAUGH RANCH 1, LP MEEKER COMMUNITIES, KB HOME COASTAL, AND CONTINENTAL RESIDENTIAL, INC. (collectively "OWNER") pursuant to the authority of Section 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code and Article XI, Section 2 of the California Constitution. Pursuant to said authority and in consideration ofthe mutual covenants set forth in this First Amendment, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Recitals. This First Amendment is made with respect to the following purposes and facts which the parties agree to be true and correct: a, The Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA, LLC (also known as the "Preannexation and Development Agreement") was approved by the Ordinance of the City Council on December 17, 2002 and recorded on 799862,2 12/9/04 I January 9, 2003 as Document No, 2003-018567 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside ("Development Agreement"). b, The real property which is subject to the Development Agreement and this First Amendment is generally known as the Roripaugh Ranch Project and is specifically described in Exhibit A to this First Amendment and incorporated herein as though set forth in full ("Property"), c, On October 21,2004, the City and the Developer entered into that certain "First Operating Memorandum to the Recorded Development Agreement between the City of Temecula and Ashby USA (Roripaugh Ranch Project)" pursuant to Section 3.55 of the Development Agreement ("First Operating Agreement"). The First Operating Agreement was recorded as Document No. 2004- in the Official Records of the County of Riverside on October _,2004. The First Operating Memorandum provides for additional funding for the construction of the permanent fire station described in Section, Accordingly, an amendment to the Development Agreement is required in order to increase the number of homes that can be built during construction of the permanent fire station, d. On September 23, 2003, the CITY and Ashby USA LLC entered into that certain "Agreement to Defer Completion of Conditions of Approval Until After Recordation of Final Map for Tract No. 29353-2 (Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan)" ("Deferral Agreement"). The Deferral Agreement was recorded as Document No. 2003- 744646 in the Official Records of the County of Riverside on September 24,2003. Said Deferral Agreement provides for the deferral of certain obligations with respect to the development of the Property. e. Portions of the Property have been sold to merchant builders who have taken their properties subject to the rights and obligations of the Development Agreement. The merchant builders are: Davidson = Roripaugh Ranch 122, LC; Shea Homes Limited Partnership; Roripaugh Ranch 100, LP: Griffin Communities; Roripaugh Ranch 1, LP Meeker Communities; KB Home Coastal; and Continental Residential, Inc. ("Merchant Builders"), The Merchant Builders have by separate agreement, to which the CITY is not a party, designated Ashby USA LLC as the OWNERS agent to complete the public improvements required by the Development Agreement and the Conditions of Approval of the Land Use Entitlements for the Project. f. Section 4,1.6 of the Development Agreement provides that only 107 building permits for residential units may be issued for Planning Areas 1 A, 2, and 3 until the permanent fire station which will serve the Project ("Fire Station") is constructed but that the Fire Chief of the City ofTemecula may, in his sole discretion, issue up to 258 total residential units on Plamring Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A and 4B so long as the permanent fire station, is substantially under construction. The Fire Chief has determined that the Fire Department can adequately serve up to 515 units within the Project during the construction of the permanent Fire Station provided that the transportation improvements required for issuance ofthe 258th building permit, as described in Attachment 5A to the Development Agreement are completed. 799862,2 12/9/04 2 g. The parties also desire to adjust the schedule for the issuance of building permits based upon the completion of certain transportation improvements. The adjustments reflect the further study and refinement of the impacts on the transportation infrastructure of the development and more accurately mitigate the traffic impacts based on the pace of development. h. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on December 15,2004 and by Resolution No, 04-_ recommended to the City Council that this First Amendment be approved, i, On January II, 2005, the City Council of the City ofTemecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and the proposed First Aniendment. Ordinance No, 05-_ introduced on January II, 2005 and adopted on January 25, 2005 approved this First Amendment. 2, Section 4.1,6, Fire Service Improvements, ofthe Development Agreement is hereby amended to read as follows: "4.1.6 Fire Service Improvements. The following shall satisfY OWNER's obligations regarding this component. "a. Convevance of Land. On or before the thirtieth (30th) calendar day after the Annexation Date of this Agreement, OWNER accomplish the following: "1. Fee simple title shall be conveyed to CITY, free and clear of all liens and matters of record; "2, OWNER shall provide CITY a CLTA insurance policy insuring CITY's title to the Station Site in an amount equal to the fair market value of the Station Site, "3. The parcel shall have not less than one and one-half (1,5) acre of flat land usable for development as a CITY fire station. In no event shall the site be in excess of three (3) gross acres, "4, CITY acknowledges that as ofthe date ofthe First Amendment to the Development Agreement, the OWNER has conveyed the fire station property to the CITY as required by subsections a.1 to a.3. "b. Grading. Prior to the issuance of the first (1st ) building permit, OWNER shall rough grade the parcel. Grading ofthe fire station site will require the approval of grading and improvement plans and the issuance of permits for property located in the County of Riverside. The CITY agrees to use its best efforts to obtain a Joint Powers Agreement with the County of Riverside to accomplish these and other Project Improvements, if necessary. 799862,2 12/9/04 3 "c. Construction. Pursuant to Section 4,1.3.1 OWNER shall tender the sum of Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000,00) and CITY shall accept the money from OWNER for the purpose of CITY's design and construction of a Fire Station and acquisition oftitle to a fire truck of CITY's sole selection. CITY acknowledges that as ofthe date of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, OWNER has transferred the $2 million to the CITY pursuant to this subsection, "d. Issuance of515 Building Permits. "1. As of the date of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement: (1) OWNER has paid to the City the sum of $2 million pursuant to Section 4,1.5 c. of this Agreement; (2) OWNER has paid the additional sum of $1,1 million to the City for the construction of the permanent fire station pursuant to Section 1 of the First Operating Memorandum; (3) CITY has approved plans and specifications for the permanent fire station; (4) City has let a contract for construction of the permanent fire station; and (5) the permanent fire station is under construction. "2. Up to one hundred seven (107) building permits in Planning Areas 1 A, 2 and 3 may be issued upon a finding by the City Manager that all other requirements of the Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval of the Land Use Entitlements of the Project for the issuance of 107 building permits have been fulfilled, "3, Up to a maximum of two hundred fifty seven (257) residential building permits total for the Project to be issued within Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A, and 4B upon a finding by the City Manager that: (I) the permanent fire station is substantially under construction; and (2) all other requirements of the Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval of the Land Use Entitlements ofthe Project for the issuance of the building permits have been fulfilled, "4. Up to a maximum of five hundred fifteen (515) residential building permits for Planning Areas lA, 2, 3, 4A and 4B shall be issued upon a finding by the City Manager that: (I) the permanent fire station is substantially under construction; (2) the transportation improvrnents required to be installed prior to issuance of the 258th building permit as described in Attachment 5A are completed; (3) permanent access on Murietta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, including the bridges on said roads, will be completed upon the opening of the permanent fire station; and (4) all other requirements of the Development Agreement and Conditions of Approval of the Land Use Entitlements of the Project for the issuance ofthe building permits have been fulfilled. 799862,2 12/9/04 4 "e. Fire Station Construction Street Improvements. OWNER shall, subject to final review and Acceptance by CITY, construct the street improvements adjacent to the Fire Station in conformance with the conditions set forth in Attachment 5A to this Agreement and subject to the CITY's approved street improvement plans for the public street(s) which are immediately adjacent to the Fire Station. OWNER shall commence and complete the street improvements, including but not limited to, asphalt concrete travel lanes, concrete curb and gutter, sidewalk per Specific Plan and right-of-way landscaping as required by CITY. The improvements described in this Section shall be completed not less than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the date the CITY will place the Fire Station in full 'operation, Owner hereby grants a license to the City over or through its property adjacent to the Fire Station for the purposes of allowing'access to the Fire Station for construction and operation of the Fire Station which license shall terminate upon the acceptance of the streets adjacent to the Fire Station into the City-maintained street system. City and Owner may fulfill the access requirement by entering into a separate license agreement with specific details of the rights and obligations of the parties, "f. Release. Upon the funding of the public finance district or other fInancing mechanism and CITY's ability to utilize such monies for construction of a permanent fire station as described in Section 4.1.6, and the Acceptance of title to the site, then OWNER's further obligations to pay the Fire component of the DIP will be credited by CITY, and CITY shall not impose restrictions on building permit issuance based upon nonpayment of the Fire component ofthe DIP. "g. Limitation on Participation. The OWNER agrees to not participate in the design or construction of the Fire Station, even if it is funded by a public fmancing district. However, to ensure architectural compatibility with future development, CITY agrees to allow OWNER's architect to coordinate with the architect hired by CITY for the sole purpose of providing input into the architectural themes of the exterior to the fire station." 3, Attachment 5 is hereby deleted from the Agreement and in its place "Attachment 5A" is substituted in full. "Attachment 5A" is attached hereto as Exhibit B and by this reference incorporated herein as though set forth in full. To the extent the terms of Attachment 5A conflicts with Condition 76 of City Council Resolution No, 01- 113 (approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 29353) or Condition 58 of City Council Resolution No. 02-114 (approval of Tentative Tract Map No, 29661), the provisions of Attachment 5A shall apply and supercede any conflicting provision of said conditions. To the extent a requirement of said Conditions 76 or 58 is not also covered in Attachment 5A, then said requirement shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding theoadoption of this First Amendment to the Development Agreement. The requirements of this Attachment 5A pertain only to required transportation improvements, OWNER 799862,2 12/9/04 5 acknowledges and agrees that other requirements of the Development Agreement, the Specific Plan, and the conditions of approval of the land use approvals require certain other improvements, including park and recreation improvements and fire service improvements, and compliance with the applicable building codes, to be completed prior to issuance of certain building permits, OWNER agrees that nothing contained in Attachment 5A is intended to nor shall be construed to waive any other applicable federal, state or local requirements for the issuance of building permits. 4. Except as specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 5. This First Amendment contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof, all prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, concerning the subject matter hereof, except for the First Operating Memorandwn and the Deferral Agreement, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. 799862,2 12/9/04 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Covenant as of the day and year first above written, CITY OF TEMECULA, a municipal corporation Mayor Attest: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk Approved As to Form: Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 799862,2 12/9/04 7 799862,2 12/9/04 ASHBY USA, LLC, a California limited liability company By: Ashby Development Co., Inc., its Managing Partner By: Justin K. Ashby President By: USA Investment Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, its member By: USA Commercial Mortgage Company, a Nevada corporation, its non-Member Manager. By: Joseph D. Milanowski President 8 DAVIDSON = RORIP AUGH RANCH 122, LC Name: Title: Name: Title; SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Name: Title: Name: Title: RORIAPAUGH RANCH 100, LP: GRIFFIN COMMUNITIES Name: Title: 799862.2 12/9/04 9 Name: Title: RORIPAUGH RANCH 1, LP MEEKER COMMUNITIES Name: Title: Name: Title: KB HOME COASTAL Name: Title: Name: Title: CONTINENTAL RESIDENTIAL, INC. 799862,2 12/9/04 10 Name: Title: Name: Title: 799862,2 12/9/04 11 799862,2 12/9/04 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY 12 RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT 1 ~etes and Bounds description of the North one-half of the North one-half of Section 20 of TIS, R2W, S.B.M. Bepnnlng at the Northeast comer o{said Section 20, thence along the easterly line of said Section 20 South 00 34' 31" W 1319.80 feetto Ibe North Sixteenth comer thereof; Thence along the s.outhedy line of Ibe North one-balf of the North onc-balf of sald ' Section 20 North 88"36'41" West, a distance of 5229.85 feet to the North Sixteenth CO(JICl thereof; Thence along the weSt line ofsald Section 20 North 00"26' 13" West, a distance of 1319.23 feet to the Northwest comer thereof; Thence along the Northerly line of said Section 20 South 88037'05" Bast, a distance of 5233.02 feet to the Point of Beginnl.,g, containing an area ,of 158.45 acres, more or less; nw description is for ehhibit purposes only. The troe legal descrlption is: The North one-haIf of the North o~haJf of Section 20, TowDsbip 7 South, Range 2 West, San Bemardino Base and Meridian, County of RiversIde, S~e of Clilifomia, according to the Official Plat thereof. " RORIPAUGH RANCH PROJECT a M~tes and Bounds description of Section 21 of TIS, R2W. S.B;M. Beginning at the Northeast corner of said Section 21, thence along the easterly line of said Section 21 South 0059' IS" West 2664.97 feet to the East quarter section corner; thence continuing along saideaster1y line South 00 2i' 34" West 2636,07 feet to the So1ltheast comer of said SCction 21; thence along the Southerly 1ino of said sCction North 89" 39' 13" West 5282.88 feet to the Southwest comer of said section; thence .along the westerly line of said section North 00 33' 47" East 3809.86 feet to the North sixtcenth comer of said section; thence continuiDg along said westerly line North 0"34' 31" Bast 1319.80 feet to the Northwest section comer; tben<:e along the northerly line of said section North 880 29' 31" Bast 5296.39 feet to the ~olnt of!3cginning, containing an area of 632.2 acres. more or less. ' , 'Ibis description is for exlu'bit purposes only. nie bue legal description is: section 21, ToWDSbip 7 South, ~ 2 West, San Bernardino Baso and Meridian, County of Riverside, State of California, according to the Official Plat 1hei-eof. ' I> RORlPAUGR RANCH PROmCf '3 Metes and Bounds description of a portion of Section 20 of17S, RZW, S.B.M. Commencing at the North .ixlccntb comer of SectiOll 20, Township 7 South, Raage 2 West, San Bernardino Bue IIId Meridilll, being the Northeast comer of that c:ertaln . , puccI designated as "Not a Patt" as shOWD by Parcel Map on filo in Book t. of Pan:cl Maps, Paces 44 tIuoup 46, Ibcn:or, Recotds 0' the County of Riverside, California: thence atOllg the oastedy Uncohaid SeetlOll20 SolI1b 00 33'47" W, a dlstllllce of 974. 13 feet to lhe T1ue Point of Beginning; TbCllCC North 89-25'58" West, a distance of 929.81 feet more 'or los8 to tho Easterly line ollhe lll\d conv~ to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern CalIfornia by deed It<:OfIIW AprIl 24, 1968 as InSttVmclrt No. 3m4. Official Records of Bald County; Thence along said Easterly line North 12032'09" Bast. a distance of 762.6!J feet; Thenc:c on a line parallel with the Sou1b line of said parocl dc8lgnated as "Not a Pmt" South 89"25'58" East. a distance of 771.65 feet to the True Point ofBeglnning. conllllning In area of 14.57 ICI'CI, more or less. This description Is for exhibit PUIpOSe$ only. ." EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT SA R:\S P A\2004\04'0371, Roripaugh Ranch,1\CC DA Amend Draft Ordinance,doc 5 EXHIBIT B ATTACHMENT SA (REVISED JANUARY 11, 2005) Transportation Improvements 799862,2 12/9/04 13 Attachment SA (Revised January 11,2005) ON-SITE AND OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS The following shall be used to construct the transportation improvements included in this Attachment: (a) All proposed road improvements shall include associated flood control, storm drain, water, and sewer lines; (b) All references to bridges shall mean hydro-arch bridges or other bridge designs as approved by the City Engineer; (c) Full-width improvements shall consist of the complete street and landscape improvements within the right-of-way; (d) Half-width improvements shall consist of the construction of the street improvements from curb to the raised landscaped median, the full-width raised landscaped median, where applicable, and a 14' travel lane adjacent to the median on the unimproved half; (e) On center improvements shall mean a, A 38' paved width improvement consisting of two 14' travel lanes and a 10' turn lane, or b, A 40' paved width improvement consisting of two 14' travel lanes and a 12' turn lane, PHASE I (Planning Areas 1-48, 6, and 32 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan) Onsite Prior to issuance of the 258th building permit or as otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, the following improvements shall be completed: 1, Butterfield Stage Road ,Construct half-width improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the south project boundary at Planning Area 32, including construction of two full-width bridges within and over Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash, 2, Butterfield Stage Road ,Dedicate full-width right-of-way from the northern project boundary to Murrieta Hot Springs Road. 802012,2 December 9, 2004 1 Attachment SA (Revised January 11, 2005) 3, Murrieta Hot Springs Road ,Construct full-width improvements from east of Pourroy Road at the northern project boundary to the MWD pipeline property, 4. Murrieta Hot Springs Road ,Construct half-width improvements from the MWD pipeline property to Butterfield Stage Road, 5, Nicolas Road ,Offer a dedication for a 110' right-of-way from Butterfield Stage Road to the west project boundary, 6, Nicolas Road _Construct northerly half-width plus 10 feet from Butterfield Stage Road to the western project boundary. 7, South Loop Road ,Construct southerly half-width in front of fire station (Planning Area 32), 8, "A" Street, Construct full-width from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to Butterfield Stage Road, 9, "B" Street ,Construct full-width improvements from Nicolas Road to "A" Stree!. 10. North Loop Road, Construct a full-width bridge over and within Santa Gertrudis Creek and connect the bridge to Butterfield Stage Road with full width improvements, 11, Construct the following traffic signals and related intersection improvements: a. Traffic signal at the intersection of Pourroy Road and Murrieta Hot Springs Road. b, Traffic signals may be required, as warranted, at the two other project entrances from Murrieta Hot Springs Road located to the east and west of the Pourroy Road main project entrance. Offsite Prior to the issuance of the 1 sf building permit, the following transportation improvements shall be completed: 1, The Developer shall contribute an undetermined percentage of the total construction costs for traffic signals for the lane improvements at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Alta Murrieta in the City of Murrieta including improvements to be specified, The developer shall provide the City of Temecula with a letter from 802012,2 December 9, 2004 2 Attachment SA (Revised January 11,2005) the City of Murrieta stating that a fair share contribution to identified improvements at this intersection has been made. 2, The Developer shall contribute 5,8% of the total construction costs for the traffic signal and additional improvements identified as: southbound left turn lane, southbound right turn lane, eastbound through lane, eastbound right turn lane, westbound through lane, and westbound free right turn lane at 1-215 Freeway (Southbound Ramps) at Murrieta Hot Springs Road. Prior to the issuance of the 258th building permit or as otherwise specified in the Development Agreement, the following transportation improvements shall be completed: 3, Nicolas Road ,Construct 40' width on center improvements from the western project boundary to 450' east of the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection, PHASE 2 (Planning Areas 10, 11, 12, 14- 24, 27 -31, 33A, and 338 of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan) Prior to the issuance of the 258th building permit in Phase 1 any building permit in Phase 2, the following Onsite and Off site transportation improvements must be completed: Onsite 1, Butterfield Stage Road Construct remaining half-width improvements from Murrieta Hot Springs Road to the south project boundary at Planning Area 32, including construction of two full-width bridges within and over Santa Gertrudis Creek and Long Valley Wash, not completed in the Phase 1 work, 2, Murrieta Hot Springs Road ,Construct remaining half-width improvements from the MWD pipeline property to Butterfield Stage Road, 3. North Loop Road Construct full-width improvements from the bridge structure at North Loop Road/Santa Gertrudis Creek crossing to the Long Valley Wash Bridge structure at South Loop Road, 4, South Loop Road ,Construct the full width bridge structure crossing Long Valley Wash and construct full width street improvements from this bridge to Butterfield Stage Road, 802012,2 December 9, 2004 3 Attachment SA (Revised January 11,2005) 5, Nicolas Road ,Construct remaining improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to western project boundary. 6. The developer shall construct the following traffic signals and related intersection improvements: a, Murrieta Hot Springs Road at Butterfield Stage Road. b. Nicolas Road at Butterfield Stage Road. c. Calle Chapos at Butterfield Stage Road. Offsite 1 Butterfield Stage Road Construct full width improvements from the southern project boundary at Planning Area 32 to Rancho California Road excluding any existing improvements. 2, Nicolas Road ' Construct 40' width improvements from 450 feet east of the existing Nicolas Road/Calle Girasol intersection to Liefer Road including the full width bridge structure over Santa Gertrudis Creek. 3, Calle Girasol and the Nicolas Road / Calle Girasol intersection _Realign existing Calle Girasol to its ultimate intersection with Nicolas Road including right-of-way acquisition, 4, Calle Chapos ,Construct 38' width on center improvements from Butterfield Stage Road to the existing paved terminus at Walcott Lane. 5. Winchester Road at Nicolas Road traffic signal to be constructed with the following ultimate lane configurations: a. Northbound Winchester: 2 Left Turn Lanes, 4 Through Lanes, I Free Right Turn Lane, b. Southbound Winchester: 2 Left Turn Lanes, 4 Through Lanes, I Right Turn Lane, c. Eastbound Nicolas Road; I Left Turn Lane, I Through Lane, I Right Turn Lane, d. Westbound Nicolas Road: 3 Left Turn Lanes, 1 Through Lane, 1 Right Turn Lane. 802012,2 December 9, 2004 4 Attachment SA (Revised January 11,2005) These improvements are in addition to the existing improvements and lane configurations and shall supplement not replace existing turning movements, 6, Butterfield Stage Road at Rancho California Road traffic signal with the ultimate lane configurations of: a, Northbound BSR: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes b, Southbound BSR: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes c, Eastbound RCA: 2 Left Turn Lanes, 2 Through Lanes d, Westbound RCA: 1 Left Turn Lane, 2 Through Lanes These improvements are in addition to the existing improvements and lane configurations and shall supplement not replace existing turning movements. (City has agreed to use an expected $2,7 million grant to assist in the construction of this segment.) 7, The Developer shall contribute 11.1 % of the total construction costs for traffic signals and northbound through lane, southbound through lane, and westbound through lane improvements at Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Winchester Road, 8, The Developer shall contribute 12.4% of the total construction costs for traffic signal and northbound shared left-through lane, eastbound through lane, and westbound through lane for Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Margarita Road. OTHER CONDITIONS TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS The requirements of this Attachment 5A pertain only to required transportation improvements. Other requirements of the Development Agreement, the Specific Plan, and the conditions of approval of the land use approvals require certain other improvements, including park and recreation improvements and fire service improvements, and compliance with the applicable building codes, to be completed prior to issuance of certain building permits, Nothing contained in this Attachment 5A is intended to nor shall be construed to waive any other requirements for the issuance of building permits, 802012,2 December 9, 2004 5 ATTACHMENT NO, 6 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT (DECEMBER 15, 2004) R:\S P A\2004\04'0371, Roripaugh Ranch,1\CC Staff Report'1 ,doe 18 ORIGINAL STAFF REPORT - PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION Date of Meeting: December 15, 2004 Prepared by; Dan Long Title: Associate Planner File Number PA04-0369 PA04-0370 PA04-0371 PA04-0590 Application Type; Tentative Tract Map (32004) General Plan Amendment Specific Plan Amendment Amendment to Development Agreement Project Description: A General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use Designation from Open Space (OS) to Residential, Low-Medium (LM); a Specific Plan Amendment to change the zoning designation from Open Space (OS) to Low-Medium (LM) Residential, make modifications to the Fuel Modification Zone boundary, revise the Design Guidelines, change the zoning of PAlO from 20,000 square foot lots to 10,000 square foot lots and general clean-up items throughout the Specific Plan; a Tentative Tract Map (32004) to create an additional 6 lots in PA1A; and Amendment No, 1 to the Development Agreement, which modifies the timing of improvements and construction of a new fire station. Recommendation: 0 Approve with Conditions o Deny o Continue for Redesign o Continue to: !:8J Recommend Approval with Conditions o Recommend Denial CEQA: o Categorically Exempt (Class) !:8J Notice of Determination (Section) 15162 o Negative Declaration o Mitigated Negative Declaration with Monitoring Plan DEIR R:\S P A\2004\04-037L Roripaugh Ranch-]\STAFF REPORT-doc PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Applicant Ashby USA, LLC Completion Date: May 26, 2004 Zoning Designation: Specific Plan Site/Surrounding Land Use: Site: Vacant North: South: East West Single-Farnily Residences/Open Space Single-Family Residences Single-Farnily Residences/Open Space Single-Family ResidencesNacant BACKGROUND SUMMARY [8J 1, Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Arnendment, a Tentative Tract Map and Amendment No.1 to the Development Agreement. General Plan Amendment The proposed General Plan Amendment is a request to change the Land Use Designation for Planning Area 7B (2.0 acres) from Open Space (OS) to Low-Medium Density, Residential. The current Specific Plan includes two detention basins within the panhandle (PA 7B and PA 7C), designated as Open Space. The adjacent landowner to the west has designed a storm drain system capable of directing the flow from the Roripaugh Ranch project site. As a result, the two- acre detention basin in Planning Area 7B is no longer necessary. The General Plan Amendment, if approved, would allow 6 additional lots in Pianning Area 1 A. Specific Plan Amendment The proposed Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Amendment is a request to change the zoning of Planning Area 7B from Open Space to Low Medium Density Residential; change the zoning of Planning Area 10 from Low Density, Residential to Low Estate Density, Residential; modify the location an'd description of the Fuel Modification Zone, provide additional options to various planning areas for the product type permitted, revise the Design Guidelines to simplify the review process and address various clean-up items such as fencing and the nature trail. The applicant is requesting to change Planning Area 7B from Open Space (OS) to Low Medium Density, Residential (LM), If approved PA7B would be deleted altogether and would become part of PA1A. As noted above, PA 7B is a 2.0 acre detention basin and the proposed change would not reduce the amount of parkland or useable Open Space. The 2.0 acres of area will allow for R:\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch-l\STAFF REPORT.doc 2 an additional 6 units within PA 1 A bringing to total number of units within the panhandle to 515, The applicant is also requesting a change of zoning of Planning Area 10 from Low Density, Residential (L) to Low-Estate Density, Residential (L-E). The current zoning designation, Low Density, requires a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet; a total of 11 units were anticipated, The proposed request to change the zoning to L-E would allow 10,000 square foot lots and a total of 14 lots are currently anticipated. PA 10 is surrounded by land designated as Open Space (OS) and Murrieta Hot Springs Road, There are not any existing residences abutting the Planning Area, The proposed Specific Plan Amendment also includes a request to modify the location and description of the Fuel Modification Zone adjacent Planning Areas 10, 14-17, and 19. The Fuel Modification Zone was initially located within City-owned Open Space habitat area. However subsequent to the adoption of the Specific Plan, state and federal resource agencies determined that the Fuel Modification Zone could not be located within the Open Space habitat area, The Fuel Modification Zone is proposed entirely within the residential planning areas (PA's 10,14-17, and 19) as shown on exhibits 4-346-1 and 2 and 3-34C-l and 2 (attachment 4). The initial implementation of the development standards and design guidelines within the Specific Plan has presented some difficulties. Staff has brought a total of five (5) product reviews before the Planning Commission and three of the five applications required continuances for modifications. Staff, therefore, has worked with the applicant to incorporate changes to the development standards and design guidelines in order to simplify the implementation process. The modifications are based upon the previous direction provided by the Planning Commission, This includes additional inspirational photos, a cleaner description of the required elements that are integral parts of the structure and traditional elements shall be provided as opposed to eclectic styles. Staff has worked with the applicant to incorporate these changes into the Design Guidelines. The applicant has provided additional inspirational photos, additional language for required elements and notes regarding integral elements. In addition, the applicant has provided a note on each architectural style page directing the reader to section 4.10.3 through 4,10.3.9, These sections require further detail to features such as doors, windows, entries, garage doors and roof types. In addition to the above amendments to the Specific Plan, the applicant has requested language that provides flexibility in the type of potential product types permitted in Planning Areas 12,14, and 15. These planning areas will maintain the zoning designation of M2, however the arnendment will allow standard and/or clustered products as opposed to only clustered products as the current Specific Plan requires. With all of the above amendments in place, the maximum number of lots will actually be reduced from 2,015 to approximately 1,761, even with the modified zoning and product types permitted. The EIR allows for a total of 2,015 units, Other various amendments to the Specific Plan include clean-up items such as clarifications to the fencing plan, amending the nature trail to coincide with the above changes, modifying the design of the sports park (PA27) to add an additional 1.4 acres of area, and revising the various exhibits and planning area descriptions to reflect the above changes. Tentative Tract Map The applicant is requesting a Tentative Tract Map to subdivide the 2.0 acres of land currently designated as Open Space (OS) in PA76. The OS area was initially designated as a detention basin; however it is no longer necessary due to recent off-site storm drain improvements, The Tentative Tract Map includes a total of 18 lots; while there will only be a net increase of six lots in R:\S P A\2004\04-037], Roripaugh Ranch-] \ST AFF REPORTdoc 3 Planning Area 1 A, the proposed changes affects adjacent lots, The proposed map would extend the existing cul-de-sac north into the areas of the deleted detention basin. Staff has reviewed the proposed map and has determined that the rnap is conformance with the Specific Plan and City's Subdivision Ordinance, including lot area, width and depth, First Amendment to Development Aoreement The proposed request to amend the Development Agreement includes language that allows a total of 250 building permits to be issued in Planning Areas 1 A, 2, 3, 4A and 4B provided the permanent Fire Station and secondary access are substantially under construction, A total of 515 building permits may be issued if, in addition to the Fire Station and secondary access, permanent access from Murrieta Hot Springs Road and Butterfield Stage Road, including bridges and roads are complete upon the opening of the permanent Fire Station. The current Development Agreement requires the fire station and secondary access to be complete or under substantial construction before issuance of the 108th building permit. The Fire Chief has reviewed this request and has determined that the Fire Department can adequately serve up to 250 units within the project during construction of the permanent Fire Station and secondary access, As a result of the First Amendment to the Development Agreement, Attachment 5 of the Development Agreement will be deleted as a binding document and will be replaced with Attachment 5A, ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION [8J 1, The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously approved (Negative Declaration) (EIR) and is exempt from further Environmental Review (CEOA Section 15162 subsequent EIR's and Negative Declarations). CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION Staff has reviewed the proposed General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map (32004) and the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and has determined that the proposed project, as conditioned, is consistent with the goals and policies in the related General Plan Amendment and the project is consistent with the adopted and certified EIR, Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City Council approve the project with the conditions of approval. FINDINGS General Plan Amendment 1, The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan. The proposed amendment is consistent with the direction, goals and policies of the adopted General Plan because the project site is 2.0 acres and includes a tentative tract map for future development that is consistent with the surrounding developed areas, In addition, the project site is within a Specific Plan in which an EIR has been prepared, adopted, and certified and the proposed amendment is consistent with the review of the R:\S P A\2004\04-037I, Roripaugh Ranch-l\STAFF REPORT.doc 4 EIR, 2. The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area, The proposed amendment will not have an impact on the character of the surrounding area because the project site is surrounded by urban development within City boundaries. The proposed use will remain residential and is consistent with the surrounding residential uses, Specific Plan Amendment 1. The Specific Plan amendrnent is consistent with the General Plan. The zone change, design guidelines, development standards and various clean-up items are consistent with the related General Plan Amendment for the City of Temecula, The site is physically suitable for the residential uses that will eventually occur in this area, Tentative Tract MaD (Code Section 16,09.1400) 1. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No, 32004 is consistent with the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Development Code, Municipal Code and the related General Plan Amendment because the project has been designed in a manner that it is consistent with the policies and standards in the General Plan, Subdivision Ordinance, Development Code, Municipal Code and related General Plan Amendment. 2, The tentative map does not propose to divide land, which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The proposed land division is not land designated for conservation or agricultural use and has never been entered into any Williamson Act Contracts. 3. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the tentative map, The project consists of an 18-lot Tentative Tract Map on property designated for residential uses, which is consistent with the related General Plan Amendment, as well as, the development standards of the Specific Plan. 4, The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with conditions of approval, are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project site does not currently include a creek, wetlands, or habitat subject to environmental review, The project site has been disturbed and is not considered to contain critical habitat. The project consists of a Tract Map on property designated for residential uses, which is consistent with the related General Plan Amendment, as well R:\S P A\2004\04-037J, Roripaugh Ranch-I\STAFF REPORT.doc 5 as the development standards of the Specific Plan. The project has been reviewed ,subject to CEQA and has been determined to be exempt subject to CEQA Section 15162. An EIR has been prepared, adopted and certified for the project site and the Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the project description of the certified EIR. 5, The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The project has been reviewed and commented on by the Fire Safety Division and the Building Safety Division. As a result, the project will be conditioned to address their concerns. Further, provisions are made in the General Plan, Development Code and Specific Plan to ensure that the public health, safety and welfare are safeguarded, The project is consistent with these documents, 6, The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible, The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. Prior to the construction of any structures the applicant will be required to submit building plans to the Building Department that comply with the Uniform Building Code, which contains requirements for energy conservation. 7. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, All required rights-of-way and easements have been provided on the Tentative Tract Map. The Public Works Department and Community Services District have reviewed the proposed division of land and adequate conditions and/or modifications have been made to the Tentative Tract Map. 8. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby). The proposed project is within an approved Specific Plan area. The Specific Plan was designed and analyzed for a maximum of 2, 0 15 residential units and parkland has been dedicated using this number. The proposed project will not exceed (he maximum number of units in the Specific Plan area and is therefore consistent with Quimby. ATTACHMENTS 1, Specific Plan Addendum - Blue Page 8 2. PC Resolution No. 2004-_ (General Plan Amendment, Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan Addendum, First Amendment to the Development Agreement and Tentative Tract Map) (32004) - Blue Page 9 3, CC Draft Resolution No. 05 -_ (General Plan Amendment) - Blue Page 10 Exhibit A - Proposed General Plan Designation R:\S P A\2004\04-037I, Roripaugh Ranch-l\STAFF REPORTdoc 6 4, CC Draft Resolution No. 05 -_(Specific Plan Addendum) - Blue Page 11 Exhibit A - Proposed Specific Plan Addendum Exhibit B - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. CC Draft Ordinance No. 05-_ (Specific Plan Zoning Standards) - Blue Page 12 Exhibit A - Proposed Zoning Standards 6. CC Draft Ordinance No. 05- _ (First Arnendment to Development Agreement) - Blue Page 13 Exhibit A - Draft First Amendment to Development Agreement Exhibit B - Attachment 5A 7, CC Draft Resolution No. 05-_ (Tentative Tract Map 32004) - Blue Page 14 Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Exhibit B - Tentative Tract Map 32004 R:\S P A\2004\04-037I, Roripaugh Ranch-I\ST AFF REPORT-doc 7 ATTACHMENT NO.7 EXCERPT FROM DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES (DECEMBER 15, 2004) R\S P A\2004\04-0371, Roripaugh Ranch,1\CC Staff Report'1,doc 19 ITEM 19 APPROVAL 'AL) CITY ATTORNEY ~.Pc.@: DIRECTOR OF FINA E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council ~usan W, Jones, City Clerk January 11, 2004 DATE: SUBJECT: Council Vacancy created by the election of Jeff Stone to Riverside County Board of Supervisors RECOMMENDATION: Provide direction to staff regarding filling of Council vacancy, SUMMARY: Council Member Jeff Stone was elected to the Riverside County Board of Supervisors at the March 2, 2004 election, Council Member Stone formally submitted his letter of resignation, effective January 3, 2005, the day he took office as a member of the Board of Supervisors, Within 30 days of the effective date of Council Member Stone's resignation, the Council may either (1) appoint a replacement to serve out the remainder of his term or (2) call a special election to be held on June 7, 2005 to elect a replacement to serve out the remainder of his term, BACKGROUND: Government Code Section 36512(b) provides that the City Council has 30 days from the "commencement of the vacancy" to appoint a replacement for Council Member Stone to serve out his term or to call a special election to elect a replacement to serve out his term, Commencement of the vacancy would be the effective date of his resignation and not the date of the resignation letter, Each option has its benefits, The first option, that of appointment, provides for a replacement within 30 days, and saves the City the cost of an election, which is estimated between $40,000 _ $60,000, depending on whether administrative costs are charged, If the Council chooses to appoint, the Council could accept applications and appoint in the same manner as a Commission appointment, or select an alternate process, However, an appointment must be made by February 2, 2005, to meet the 30-day requirement of the Elections Code regarding appointments, The second option is to hold a "special election," Under Government Code Section 36512(b) the "special election" must be held on a regularly established election date" not less than 114 days from the call of the special election, Elections Code Section 1000 sets the "established election dates" for a special election, The earliest date a special election to fill Council Member Stone's seat on the Council would be June 7, 2005, Unlike special elections for an initiative or regular council elections which may be held 88 days following the call for the election, an election to fill a council vacancy must be held not less than 114 days notice following the call of the special election, Council action to call a special election on June 7, 2005 to fill Council Member Stone's seat would need to be completed on or before February 12, 2005, ITEM 20 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY 'iiJ DIRECTOR OF FIN E CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: FROM: City Manager/City Council ~usan W, Jones, City Clerk/Director of Support Services January 11, 2005 DATE: SUBJECT: Selection of City Council Committee Assignments PREPARED BY: Cheryl Domenoe, Administrative Assistant U RECOMMENDATION: 1. Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as liaison to each of the City Commissions and Committees: Commission Liaison (One Member) Community Services Commission Old Town Local Review Board Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Planning Commission PublicfTraffic Safety Commission 2, Appoint two members of the City Council to serve on each of the following Advisory Committees: Advisorv Committees (Two Members) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee Economic DevelopmenVOld Town Steering Committee Finance Committee Joint City CouncilfTVUSD Committee Library Task Force Old Town Temecula Community Theater Ad Hoc CommitteefTheater Advisory Committee Public Works/Facilities Committee Agenda Reports/Committee Assignments 2005 3, Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following external committees: Representative AssiQnments (External Organizations) Animal Friends Liaison/JPA Representative French Valley Airport Committee League of Calif, Congress - 2005 Voting Delegates Murrieta Creek Advisory Board National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2005 Voting Delegate Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (advisory only) Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors Trails Master Plan Development Committee WRCOG/RCA Representative 4, Appoint member(s) of the City Council to serve on each of the following Council Subcommittees: Council Subcommittees /' Cable Franchise Renewal Committee Campus Project Ad Hoc Council Subcommittee Children's Museum Ad Hoc Subcommittee Electrical Needs Ad Hoc Subcommittee Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Open Space Subcommittee Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee SAF-T NET Subcommittee Technology Ad Hoc Subcommittee Telecommunications Subcommittee Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee Temecula/Murrieta Subcommittee Veteran's War Memorial Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Committee Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) 5, Review the current members of the General Plan Community Advisory Committee and appointment new members as appropriate: General Plan Communitv Advisorv Committee 1 Planning Commissioner - David Matthewson 1 Public Traffic Safety Commissioner - Darrell Connerton 1 Community Services Commissioner - Jim Meyler 5 City Residents - Mark Broderick, Tony Harris, Paul Jacobs, Greg Morrison, John Telesio 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce - Janese Reyes 1 Representative of the EDC - Gary Youmans 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization - Bob Wheeler The 5 City residents represent one appointment from each Councilmember, Darrell Connerton is no longer on the Traffic Commission so another representative for that commission will need to be appointed, Agenda Reports/Committee Assignments 2005 2 BACKGROUND: The City Council has established the policy of appointing one of its members to serve as liaison to each of the City commissions and committees. This policy also included appointing councilmembers to serve as the Council's representatives to external organizations and on a number of Council ad-hoc sub-committees. These members will serve through calendar year 2005, Attached for your convenience is a list of the Committee Assignments for 2004. ATTACHMENTS: 2004 Committee Assignments List Agenda Reports/Commitlee Assignments 2005 3 TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL 2004 Committee Assiqnments Commission Liaison (One Member) Community Services Commission Old Town Local Review Board Old Town Redevelopment Advisory Committee Planning Commission PublicfTraffic Safety Commission Advisorv Committees (Two Members) Community Service Funding Ad Hoc Committee Economic Development/Old Town Steering Committee * Finance Committee * Joint City CouncilfTVUSD Committee * Library Task Force Old Town Temecula Community Theater Ad Hoc CommitteefTheater Advisory Committee Public Works/Facilities Committee * * These meetings must be noticed at least 72 hours in advance. Representative Assiqnments (External Organizations) Animal Friends Liaison/JPA Representative French Valley Airport Committee League of Calif Congress - 2004 Voting Delegates Murrieta Creek Advisory Board National League of Cities Annual Congress - 2004 Voting Delegate Pechanga Tribal Council Liaison Riverside County Habitat Conservation Agency (advisory only) Riverside County Transportation Commission Riverside Transit Agency Representative Temecula Sister City Corporation Board of Directors Trails Master Plan Development Committee WRCOG/RCA Representative Council Subcommittees Cable Franchise Renewal Committee Campus Project Ad Hoc Council Subcommittee Children's Museum Ad Hoc Subcommittee Electrical Needs Ad Hoc Subcommittee Old Town Civic Center Ad Hoc Subcommittee Open Space Subcommittee Ronald Reagan Sports Park Ad Hoc Subcommittee SAF-T NET Subcommittee (also Connerton) Technology Ad Hoc Subcommittee Telecommunications Subcommittee Temecula Hospital Ad Hoc Subcommittee TemeculalMurrieta Subcommittee Veteran's War Memorial Villages of Old Town Ad Hoc Committee Wall of Honor Ad Hoc Subcommittee Zone Committee (relating to TUMF Program for WRCOG) Usts\City Council Committee Assignments for 2004 Washington Roberts Comerchero Naggar Stone Naggar, Stone Roberts, Comerchero Naggar, Stone Roberts, Washington Stone, Roberts Comerchero, Washington Roberts, Stone Naggar Washington Naggar, (Alternate Comerchero) Stone Naggar, (Alternate Comerchero) Roberts (Alternate Stone) Steve Brown Roberts, (Alternate Comerchero) Comerchero, (A~emate Washington) Stone Naggar, Washington Washington, (Alternate Stone) Cornerchero Naggar, Washington Comerchero Naggar, Comerchero Cornerchero, Roberts Naggar, Stone Naggar, Roberts Stone Washington Roberts, Stone Naggar, Comerchero Naggar, Washington Stone, Comerchero Roberts, Naggar Stone, Comerchero Roberts (alternate Naggar) Weed Abatement Appeals Board Two Persons - Chairpersons of Public/Traffic Safety Commission & Community Services Commission General Plan Community Advisorv Committee 1 Planning Commissioner - David Matthewson 1 Public Traffic Safety Commissioner - Darrell Connerton 1 Community Services Commissioner - Jim Meyler 5 City Residents - Mark Broderick, Tony Harris, Paul Jacobs, Greg Morrison, John Telesio 1 Representative of the EDC - Gary Youmans 1 Representative of a local environmental or community organization - Bob Wheeler 1 Representative of the Chamber of Commerce - Janese M. Reyes Community Little Book 27430 Enterprise Circle West #101, Temecula 92590 695-1928 ITEM 21 APPROVAL CITY ATTORNEY DIRECTOR OF FINAN~ CITY MANAGER CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Shawn Nelson, City Manager DATE: January 11, 2005 SUBJECT: Disaster Relief Donation to the American Red Cross (Tsunami Victims)- Requested by Mayor Comerchero & Council member Naggar PREPARED BY: Aaron Adams, Sr, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1) Provide direction to staff regarding an appropriation and donation of $25,000 to the American Red Cross to assist with the disaster relief efforts underway in South Asia 2) Adopt the attached resolution of support for continued relief efforts RESOLUTION 05-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONTINUED TSUNAMI DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT IN SOUTH ASIA BACKGROUND: Mayor Comerchero and Council member Naggar have requested that the City Council consider donating $25,000 to the American Red Cross for disaster relief to assist in the tragic events that took place on December 26'h from the earthquake and tsunamis in Indonesia, The death toll from the December 26'h tragedy which affected residents and tourists from Thailand to East Africa, has topped 155,000. More than 94,000 of the dead were in Indonesia and recent reports show as many as 3,000 Americans may also have lost their lives, The U,S, Federal government has so far pledged $350 million for relief efforts as has Australia ($764.5 M) and Germany ($660 M). The International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (Federation), along with national societies like the American Red Cross, are partnering with numerous international humanitarian and non-government organizations to coordinate relief efforts, American Red Cross personnel will assist in conducting disaster and needs assessments, in addition to providing direct relief assistance to those affected by the disaster. R:\ADAMSA\COUNCIL\Tsunarn Relief Staff report.doc The American Red Cross has reported the following information on the relief effort that is underway: . Nine American Red Cross workers currently in or en-route to affected areas (Sri Lanka, Maldives, Indonesia and India) with expertise to support relief effort in three primary areas: water sanitation services, family linking and reunification, and relief supply distribution . On December 31st, the American Red Cross announced an initial $30 million in aid was on its way to the affected areas, Of this, $25 million will help pay for relief food supplies and the other $5 million will be used for nonfood relief items, such as hygiene kits . From December 26,2004, through January 2,2005 (as of 01/02105 @ 4:00 PM), more than $79,2 million has been raised. Of that $79.2 million in pledged donations, approximately $25,2 million has been received in cash, Approximately half of the donations have come through the www,redcross,org online donation site . American Red Cross leadership will continue to work with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent, ils sister societies and other international partners in the coming days and weeks on this expansive international relief effort In addition, the attached resolution of support will be forwarded to the National League of Cities in an effort to gain additional support for the relief effort from member cities. FISCAL IMPACT: Should the City Council chose to approve this donation, an appropriation of $25,000 will be necessary, ATTACHMENT: Resolution 05-_ R:\ADAMSA\COUNCIL\Tsunami Relief Staff report.doc RESOLUTION No, 05_ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONTINUED TSUNAMI DISASTER RELIEF EFFORT IN SOUTH ASIA. WHEREAS, on December 26, 2004, a 9,0 magnitude undersea earthquake caused a massive Tsunami affecting 12 countries around the Indian Ocean; and WHEREAS, the current death toll in the affected region has reached 150,000 and is expected to reach well over 200,000 in the coming weeks and months; and WHEREAS, the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (Federation), along with national societies like the American Red Cross, are partnering with numerous international humanitarian and non-government organizations to coordinate relief efforts; and WHEREAS, as a result of the generosity of the American Public, the American Red Cross has announced an initial $30 million in aid to include food and non-food relief items; and WHEREAS, the American Red Cross will continue to work with the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies in an expansive international relief effort ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Temecula hereby supports the American Red Cross in the expansive international disaster relief efforts in South Asia and will encourage members of the National League of Cities to adopt a similar Resolution of Support, PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting held on the 11th d~y of January 2005, Jeff Comerchero, Mayor R:\ASHLEYS\Resolutions\Resolution- Continued ReliefEtTort in Indonesia.doc ATTEST: Susan W. Jones, CMC City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Susan W, Jones, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify that Resolution No, 05- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 11th day of January 2005, by the following vote: AYES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: NOES: o COUNCILMEMBERS: ABSENT: o COUNCILMEMBERS: Susan W, Jones, CMC ' City Clerk R:\ASHLEYS\Resolutions\Resolution. Continued Relief Effort in Indonesia.doc ITEM 22 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: William G, Hughes, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: January 11,2005 SUBJECT: Draft Heritage Tree Policy PREPARED BY: Beryl Yasinosky, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council review the attached draft of the Heritage Tree Preservation and Protection Policy and appoint a subcommittee to finalize the policy. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula lies within a unique area of Riverside County, the beauty and welfare of which is greatly enhanced by the presence of several species of native and non-native trees of significant size and quality that contribute in a positive way to our community's environment and heritage, However, sustaining our "Heritage Trees" in such a rapidly developing area presents a challenge that requires careful planning and attentive maintenance, Land development is a complex process and is even more challenging when trees are involved. Construction activity is one of the greatest causes of decline and death to Heritage Trees in the City, In order to meet these challenges, the following draft Heritage Tree Preservation and Protection Policy has been prepared in an effort to provide guidelines for land clearing and/or development projects for which compliance with this Policy is a condition of approval. The purpose of this Policy is to ensure that tree protection is initiated prior to construction, when construction impacts can be minimized or avoided altogether, By assuring preservation and protection through regulations and standards of care, our Heritage Trees will continue to add to the unique character of the City of T emecula and its urban forest. Staff is in the process of completing an inventory of our Heritage Tree(s) using the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) and follow-up field visits to confirm the species, health and desirability of such trees in accordance with the provisions of this policy, As a part of the Policy, the Heritage Tree Inventory Listing will provide useful information to property owners, private contractors and City employees whenever any development activity is planned or performed near designated Heritage Trees. It is proposed that the inventory will be updated on a regular basis to establish a baseline of where the Heritage Tree population has been, where it is today, and where it is going in the future, The Policy also includes a section entitled "Submittal Requirements for Tree Protection and Preservation Plans," It is recognized that there are a number of policy issues to be addressed before this draft can be finalized, Staff recommends that Council appoint a subcommittee to work with staff to continue development of the Heritage Tree Policy, R:\agdrpt\05\0111\HeritageTreePolicy FISCAL IMPACT: ATTACHMENTS: None. (Draft) Heritage Tree Preservation and Protection Policy R:\agdrpt\05\0111\HeritageTreePolicy 2 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 CITY OF TEMECULA HERITAGE TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION POLICY "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 CITY OF TEMECULA HERITAGE TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ""..""..,..,..""""'..,....,.."""""""..,..""",,,..,..,..,..,..',.."",.."" """""""""..",,3 I, GENERAL INFORMATION A. Criteria for Determination of Heritage Trees..,..,......................................,..........,.4 B, Preservation of Heritage Trees ,....,..,..,....,..,..,..,.,..,.."..,.."..,.."..,..,.."..,..,..,....,....4 C, Removal or Relocation of Heritage Trees.............................................................4 II, LAND DEVELOPMENT AND HERITAGE TREES A. Pre-Consfruction - Tree Protection and Preservation Plan....................,..,..........5 1, Sife Plan,..,.."""",..,....,.."""..,..,....,....,..""..,..,..,..,.."",.."..,.."..,..,..,....,..,..,.... 5 2, Arborist Certification""..,..,....,..",..,..,..,....,..,..,..,..,.."..,.."..,.."..,..,..,..,..",..,..,.. 5 3, Tree Protection Zone ,..,..'....,..,....,..,..,....,..,..,..,..,..,..',..,.."..,..,'..,..,..,..,......,..,,5 4, Protective Fencing ,'....,..,..,....,..,....,..,..,..,....,..,..,..,..,'.."..,..,.."..,..'..,..,..,....,.... 6 5, Tree Pruning or Removal"..,....,..,..,....,..,..,..,...."..,..,..".."..,.."..,..,..,....,..,....,..6 6, Pre-Construction Meeting and Inspections...................................................... 6 B, Activities during Construcfion & Demolition near Trees..........,..,...... ........,.... ...., 7 1, Grading, Soil Compaction and Roof Protection ..,..,......,................,..,..,....,..,.., 7 2, Trenching, Excavation and Equipment Use....,...........................................,.... 7 3, Root Cutting""",..""""",..,.."""..",..,..,..""",..,..,..,.."",..""""",..""..,..""""" 8 III. HERITAGE TREE MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION A. Soil Compacfion Mitigafion ..,....,......,.............,..,........,......,.., ....,.......... ........,....,9 1, Mulch"""""""""""."""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""", 9 2, Root Buffer,..,..""""",..",..,..,..,....,.."""..,..,..,..,..,.."..,.., ,...."...."..,..,....,..",..",9 B, Irrigation"..,..""..,..,..",..",..,....,..,..,..,....,....,..,..,..,..,..,.."..,.."..,..,..,.."..,....,....,..,.., 9 C, Dusf Control",..,..,..,....,....,..,....,..,..,....,..,....,..,..,..,..,..,..".."..,..,.."...."..,..,....,..,.... 9 IV, DAMAGE TO HERITAGE TREES................................................................,10 V, DEFI NITIONS ,.."""""",..'"",.. "..,..",..,..'..",..,..,..,....,..,..,..,.."",.."..,.."..,..,..,..,..""".., 11 ATTACHEMENTS: 1, Submittal Requirements for Tree Protection and Preservation Plan 2, Heritage Tree Inventory Listing 2 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 HERITAGE TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION POLICY Introduction The City of Temecula lies within a unique area of Riverside County, the beauty and welfare of which is greatly enhanced by the presence of several species of native and non-native trees of significant size and quality that contribute in a positive way to our community's environment and heritage, Sustaining our "Heritage Trees" in such a rapidly developing area presents a challenge that requires careful planning and attentive maintenance, In order to meet these challenges, the following Heritage Tree Policy has been prepared to provide guidelines for land clearing and/or development projects for which compliance with this Policy is a condition of approval. By assuring preservation and protection through regulation and standards of care, our Heritage Trees will continue to add to the unique character of the City of Temecula and its Urban Forest. Staff has cornpleted an inventory of our Heritage Tree(s) using the City's Global Positioning System (GPS) and follow-up field visits to confirm the species, health and desirability of such trees in accordance with the provisions of this policy, The Heritage Tree Inventory Listing is attached to this policy and provides useful information to property owners, private contractors and City employees whenever any development activity is planned or performed near designated Heritage Trees, The inventory will be updated on a regular basis to establish a baseline of where the Heritage Tree population has been, where it is today, and where it is going in the future. While it is expected that most development projects that follow this Policy will reduce project impacts on Heritage Trees to a level of insignificance, this policy does not exempt a project from being reviewed pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and being evaluated for significant project impacts to Heritage Trees, 3 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. CRITERIA FOR DETERMINATION OF HERITAGE TREES Factors considered in determining if a tree qualifies as a "Heritage Tree" are the age, size, rarity and appearance of the tree, Notwithstanding the preceding, each of the following is determined to be a Heritage Tree: . Native Oak Trees, more specifically identified as Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak) and Quercus engelmannii (Engelman Oak), having a circumference of inches or greater, measured at a height of 4 feet above ground level. . Any tree having a circumference 25 inches or greater, measured at a height of 4 feet above ground level, with the exception of trees within the Eucalyptus species, . A tree or trees of any size planted as a replacement for a Heritage Tree. B. PRESERVATION OF HERITAGE TREES Any person who owns, controls, or has custody of any real property with designated Heritage Trees located thereon shall maintain those trees in a state of good health, This includes parcels designated as permanent open space or for recreational purposes. It shall be a violation of this Policy to destroy, remove or relocate designated Heritage Trees without the approval of the Planning Director and/or any regulatory approvals necessary for the development of real property located within the City of Temecula, C. REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF HERITAGE TREES The proposed removal or relocation of a designated Heritage Tree must be approved by the Planning Director in accordance with the provisions of this Policy before any action is taken, The only exceptions to this provision are as follows: . The Heritage Tree poses an immediate threat to life or public safety. . The Heritage Tree is located on an occupied, single family residence or duplex, and the owner has consented to the removal. . The Heritage Tree is located within an existing or future public right-of-way or easement area, real property, or maintenance area that has or will be dedicated to the City, the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) or any federal, state, county or other government agency, and is in conflict with the maintenance, construction or improvement of said public right-of-way, easement, real property or maintenance area, . Removal of a Heritage Tree that is specifically approved as part of a City- approved Development Plan, conditional use permit, site development review or subdivision map, Tree removal requested as part of any development approval subject to City review shall be reviewed and approved with conditions, or denied, as part of the entitiement process, 4 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 II. LAND DEVELOPMENT AND HERITAGE TREES Land Development is a complex process and is even more challenging when trees are involved, and construction activity is one of the greatest causes of decline and death to Heritage Trees within the City, Tree protection should not begin subsequent to construction, If preservation measures are delayed or ignored until construction begins, the trees may be destined to fail. The goal of this Policy is to keep injury of trees to a minimum and allow building/construction projects to proceed at the same time, All Heritage Trees cannot and should not be preserved, Trees that have become structurally unstable, in poor health, or unable to survive effect of construction become a liability to the project and should be removed. This Policy acknowledges that conflicts between Heritage Trees and development may sometimes result in the removal of trees, and recognizes the detrimental effect to the project and community when these trees die after construction is completed, Successful tree preservation occurs when construction impacts to trees are minimized or avoided altogether. The challenge is to determine when impacts will be too severe for the tree to survive, not only in the short term but also in the long term, Although, there are not quantitative methods to calculate these impacts, the following guidelines will enhance the protection of Heritage Trees from preventable damage during land development activities: A. PRE-CONSTRUCTION - TREE PROTECTION AND PRESERVATION PLAN If any activity of the project is within the dripline of a designated Heritage Tree, the Planning Director will require a site specific Tree Protection and Preservation plan that includes conditions of approval necessary to affect the purpose of this Policy, Such conditions may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1, Site Plan, The site plan shall include accurately plotted trunk locations and the dripline areas of all Heritage Trees within the proposed development area, including the Tree Protection Zone (see Section A(3), "Tree Protection Zone," below) as mapped by a surveyor or engineer. Include construction staging areas and delivery routes. (The preparer must be a Certified Arborist, Landscape Architect or other qualified professional approved by the Planning Director). 2, Arborist Certification, A certified arborist may be required to determine and provide a written report of the health and structural confirmation of the surveyed Heritage Trees and to evaluate how they will respond to development. The evaluation must describe the character of the trees and their suitability for preservation at a level of detail appropriate for the project and phase of planning, 3, Tree Protection Zone, Tree roots are generally located in the top 12-24 inches of soil and can extend to a distance exceeding the height of the tree and/or width. The roots located 1-5 feet from the trunk are often relatively inactive, and if cut, will cause a column of decay that can reach the top of a tree over time, The feeder roots of the tree can sustain damage during construction from lack of water, soil compaction or physical damage from cutting, 5 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 In and effort to minimize damage to the root system, each tree to be retained shall have a designated Tree Protection Zone identifying the area sufficiently large enough to protect the tree and its roots from disturbance, The Tree Protection Zone shall be shown on all site plans. Improvements such as paving, utility and irrigation trenching shall occur outside of the Tree Protection Zone, The Protective Fencing shall serve as the Tree Protection Zone, 4, Protective Fencinq, The type of protective fencing shall be specified and indicated on the pian with a bold dashed line, The plan shall indicate that no construction staging or disposal of construction materials or byproducts, including but not limited to paint, plaster, or chemical solutions is allowed in the Tree Protection Zone, All trees to be preserved shall be protected with five to six (5 to 6) foot high chain link fences, Fences are to be mounted on two-inch (2") galvanized iron posts, driven into the ground to a depth of at least two-feet (2') and at no rnore than ten- foot (10') centers, A two-foot (2') wide gate shall be installed for tree maintenance, Tree fencing shall be erected before demolition, grading, or construction begins and remain until final inspection of the project. A warning sign shali be prominently displayed on each protective fence, The sign shall be a minimum of 8,5 inches x 11 inches and clearly state the following: TREE PROTECTION ZONE This Fence Shall Not be Removed 5. Tree Pruninq or Removal: Prior to construction, Heritage Tees may need to be pruned away from structures or proposed construction activity, Construction or contractor personnel shall not attempt prunina. Heritage trees must be pruned by, or under the direction of, a certified arborist. Removal of trees adjacent to Heritage trees that are to remain requires a great amount of care and expertise, Only a certified arborist shall engage in tree removal. Construction or contractor personnel shall not attempt tree removal. 6, Pre-Construction Meetinq and Inspections, The Planning Director, or their representative, may require an on-site pre-construction meeting with the contractor and/or applicant to discuss tree protection with the site supervisor, grading equipment contractors and demolition crew to assure that everyone fully understands the procedures and tree protective measures concerning the project site, staging areas, haul routes, watering, contacts, etc, In addition, the Planning Director may require inspection by City staff to verify placement of protective fencing and approval of materials prior to commencement of construction, In addition, periodic inspections will be conducted to verify adherence to the tree protection measures during the on- going construction process. 6 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 B, ACTIVITIES DURING CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION NEAR TREES Soil disturbance or other damaging activities within the Tree Protection Zone is prohibited unless approved by a certified arborist to the satisfaction of the Planning Director, 1, Gradinq, Soil Compaction and Root Protection, Grading activities and soil compaction are the two factors most responsible for the decline of Heritage Trees on construction sites, The greatest increase in soil density occurs during the first few equipment passes over the soil. To dispense traffic weight, mulch and temporary root buffers can be used (please see Section III(A), "Soil Compaction Mitigation," The following guidelines can help to lessen compaction: . Do not park vehicles or equipment, storage of building materials, refuse, or excavated soils, or dump poisonous materials on or around trees and roots, (Poisonous materials include, but are not limited to, paint, petroleum, concrete, stucco mix, dirty water or any material that may be harmful to the tree,) . Do not compact soil to higher density than required in improved areas for asphalt or concrete pavements, and not to exceed 85% density in unimproved landscape areas, . Grade changes within the Tree Protection Zone are not permitted. At no time during or after construction should soil be in contact with the trunk of the tree above the basal flair, ' . Grade changes outside of the Tree Protection Zone shall not significantly alter drainage, 2, Trenchina, Excavation and Equipment Use. Trenching, excavation or boring within the Tree Protection Zone shall be limited to activities approved by a certified arborist. Alternatives should be explored for trenching outside the root zone, Avoid exposing roots during hot weather. Backfill trenches as soon as possible with soil and soak with water the same day, Small roots can die in 10 to 15 minutes and large roots may not survive an hour of exposure, If the trench must be left open all roots must be kept moist by wrapping tem in peat moss and burlap, If trenching is unavoidable, the following distances shall be maintained: .;>'TRLJNKPIAMETER'::"~: " fn~asured:4:5feetabovenatUh:l1 raae Up to 6 inches 6-9 inches 10-14 inches 15-19 inches over 19 inches '.DJ S:r~Nc:;~ ~FRQM.BO')'H .' : 'SIDESGF:rRUNK, Past Dripline 5 feet 10 feet 12 feet 15 feet . Excavation, Any approved excavation, demolition or extraction of material shall be performed with equipment that is placed outside the Tree Protection Zone, Hand digging, hydraulic, or pneumatic excavation are permitted methods for excavation within the Tree Protection Zone, 7 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 . Equipment. Use of backhoes, Ditch-Witches, steal tread tractors or other heavy vehicles within the Tree Protection Zone is prohibited unless approved by a certified arborist. If allowed, a protective root buffer is required. Do not use tree trunks as a back stop, winch support, anchorage, as a temporary power pole, signpost or other similar function. . Tunnelinq and Directional Drillinq. Approved trenching, pipe or cable installation within the Tree Protection Zone shall be either cut by hand, air- spade, or by mechanically boring a tunnel under the roots with a horizontal directional drill using hydraulic or pneumatic air excavation technology. In all cases, install the utility pipe immediately, backfill with soak and soak with water within the same day. Where acceptable, tunneling under the root system can greatly reduce both damage to the tree and the cost to repair landscape and other features destroyed in the trenching process. The following recommendations for tunneling depths are provided as follows: TRUNK DIAMETER measured 4.5 feet above. natural Less than 12 inches 12 inches or more . MINIMUM TUNNEL DEPTH:. ,.<~+/~;. 24 inches 36 inches 3. Root Cuttinq. Cutting of tree roots by utility trenching, digging foundations, placement of curbs and trenches, or other excavations requires prior approval of the Planning Director. No roots greater than 2 inches in diameter shall be cut without direction from a certified arborist. In the instance where root cutting is unavoidable, cuts should be clean and made at right angles to the roots. When practical, cut roots back to a branching lateral root. 8 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 III. HERITAGE TREE MAINTENANCE DURING CONSTRUCTION Providing adequate maintenance can mitigate stressful changes that occur to a Heritage Tree's environment during construction. To remain healthy, the tree needs to maintain stored carbohydrates and preserve the effectiveness of its growth regulators. It is recommended that development projects provide: A. SOIL COMPACTION MITIGATION To prevent negligent encroachment into the Tree Protection Zone, trees to be preserved during construction must have the specified type of protection fences in place at all times. Removal of fences, even temporarily, to allow deliveries or equipment access is not allowed unless approved by a certified arborist and a root buffer is installed. The root buffer components; mulch, gravel and plywood must be maintained continually to assure its effectiveness against soil compaction. 1. Mulch: During construction, wood chips may be spread within the Tree Protection Zone to a four to six (4 to 6) inch depth, leaving the trunk clear of mulch. This will aid in inadvertent soil compaction and moisture loss. Mulch shall be 2-inch (2") unpainted, untreated shredded wood or approved material. 2. Root Buffer: When areas under the tree canopy cannot be fenced, a temporary buffer is required and shall cover the root zoned and remain in place at the specified thickness until the final grading stage. The protective buffer shall consist of shredded wood chips spread over the roots at a minimum of 6-inchers (6") in depth (keeping the trunk clear of chips), and layered by o/.-inch quarry gravel to stabilize the o/.-inch plywood sheets laid on top. Steel plates can also be used. B. IRRIGATION Providing supplemental irrigation for trees under water stress may be the single most important treatment. Irrigation should be designed to wet the soil within the Tree Protection Zone to the depth of the root zone and to replace that water once it is depleted. Light, frequent irrigation should be avoided. Create a 6 inch berm around trees at the edge of the Tree Protection Zone and fill with no more than 6 inches of mulch. Fill the basin with water. Irrigation should wet the top 2 to 3 feet of soil to replicate similar volumes and normal rainfall patterns. C. EROSION CONTROL If a tree is adjacent to or in the immediate proximity to a grade slope of 8% or more, approved erosion control or silt barrier shall be installed outside of the Tree Protection Zone to prevent siltation or erosion within the zone. D. DUST CONTROL During extended periods of drought, wind or grading, trunks, limbs and foliage should be sprayed with water to remove accumulated construction dust. 9 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 V. DAMAGE TO HERITAGE TREES Any damage or injury to a Heritage Tree shall be reported as soon as possible to Planning Director. If a Heritage Tree is removed or irreversibly damaged as determined by the Planning Director, the contractor andlor developer may be required to install a replacement tree matching in size, quality and variety. If an acceptable replacement tree is not available, the contractor may be required to pay damages to the City for the value of the damage tree in accordance with the latest edition of "Guide for Plant Appraisal" by the International Society of Arboriculture. 10 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 VI. DEFINITIONS "Applicant" means any person corporation, partnership association of any type, public agency or other legal entity who submits an application for land development pursuant to this Policy. "Basal Flair" means the tree trunk where it emerges from the root system and flairs out to create the base of the tree. "Certified Arborist" means, for purposes of this Policy, an arborist who is registered in good standing with the International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) and is in possession of a City of Temecula business license. "City" means the City of Temecula. "Cutting" means the detaching or separating from a Heritage Tree any live limb or branch over one inch (1 ") in diameter, any pruning which changes the shape or natural character of the tree or any branch removal that removes more of the tree canopy than recommended under International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Standards. "Damage" means any action that causes permanent injury, death or disfigurement to a Heritage Tree. This may include, but is not limited to cutting, poisoning, over watering, withholding water, unauthorized relocating or transplanting of a Heritage tree; including trenching, excavating, or paving within Tree Protection Zone.. "Disfigurement" means the unsightly and injurious trimming of a Heritage Tree. This shall include tree-trimming practices not in conformance with ISA standards. It shall include pruning practices such as stubbing, heading, heading back, stubbing off, pollarding, tipping, topping off, de-horning, lopping or rounding of any Heritage Trees. "Designated Heritage Tree" means those trees possessing the qualifying attributes of a Heritage Tree and identified on the Heritage Tree Inventory Listing attached to this Policy. "Development" means the improvement of any real property which requires the approval of zoning, subdivision, conditional use permits, or site development review permits. "Director" means the Planning Director, or his or her designee. "Drip line" means a limiting line, for tree protection purposes, of the outermost area of the tree canopy (leafy area), and within which no construction or disturbance shall occur. "Heritage Tree" means a species of native and non-native trees of significant size and quality that contribute in a positive way to our community's environment and heritage. "Owner" means the legal owner of real property within the City of Temecula and any lessee of the owner. "Person" means any individual, firm, association, corporation, organization, or partnership or any city, county, district, the State or any department or agency thereof. (14 Cal. Code of Regulations, Sec.3501) 11 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 "Planning Director" means the Director of Planning of the City of Temecula, or his or her duly delegated representative. "Pruning" means the removal of water sprouts, crossed limbs, or other unhealthy branching structure as designated by the ISA. Such removal shall not change the natural form of the tree, shall not consist of stubbing or heading back branches, and shall in no case consist of removing more of the total tree canopy than recommended under ISA. "Relocation" means the transplanting of a tree from its original location to another suitable location. "Removal" means the physical removal of a tree, or causing the death or untimely decline or a tree through actions including but not limited to damage, destruction, unnecessary disfigurement, withholding water, poisoning, or other deliberate or willful action or inaction. "Right-of-Way" or "Public Right-of-Way" means, for purposes of this Ordinance, the dedicated street right-of-way, or recorded easements for routine maintenance andlor utility purposes, located within the City of T emecula. "Root Protection Zone" means the area within a circle with a radius equal to the greatest distance from the trunk to any overhanging foliage in the tree canopy. "Routine Maintenance" means the actions needed for the continued health of the tree including but not limited to, the removal of deadwood or storm damaged branches, light pruning to improve scaffolding, and removal of branches less than one inch (1 ") in diameter. "Site" means the real property on which activities subject to this Policy may occur. "Tree" means, for purposes of this Policy, a Heritage Tree. "Tree Canopy" means the area of a tree that consists primarily of branches and leaves. "Tree Protection Zone" means an area identified by the City in which no soil disturbance is permitted and activities are restricted around Heritage Tree(s) - Usually the area of a temporary fenced tree enclosure. "Urban Forest" means the natural resource composed of all tree on public and private property within the City limits and sphere of influence. 12 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 Submittal Requirements for Tree Protection and Preservation Plans The items listed below are basic requirements to be included in the Tree Protection and Preservation Plan. As each project is unique, the applicant should consult with City staff to determine exact submittal requirements. Standard Plan Requirements: 1. Clearly differentiate between existing and proposed site improvements on all plans. 2. Include preparer's name, title, license number, address, and telephone number (pre parer must be a Certified Arborist, Landscape Architect or other qualified professional approved by the Planning Director). 3. Include project title, project address, and property owner's name. 4. Provide date of last revision, north arrow, and drawn to scale (no smaller than 1" = 40'-0") 5. Label all property lines; include existing and proposed easements. 6. Label and provide width of existing and proposed roadways, access driveways, improvements within the public right-of-ways. 7. Identify staging areas, storage location for construction materials and equipment, and vehicular and equipment ingress and egress. Trees: 1. Identify all existing trees and show exact locations to scale, as follows: A. All trees, regarding of size. B. All designated Heritage Trees (as identified in the Heritage Tree Inventory Listing). C. The diameter of each tree. D. Show each trunk for multi-trunk trees 2. The tree's species and common name must be directly on the plan or keyed to a legend. Indicate whether the tree is a single or multi-trunk, and to be removed or preserved. If symbols are used for trees, a different symbol must be used for each species. 3. For all Heritage Trees to be preserved on site, clearly identify the fencing protecting the Tree Protection Zone with a bold dashed line. Identify support poles and the access gate. The protective fencing must be located outside of the Tree Protection Zone; in-ground chain link and a minimum of 5 feet in height.. The Tree Protection Zone is the area sufficiently large enough to protect the tree and its roots from disturbance, as determined by a certified arborist. 13 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 4. Indicate that no construction staging or disposal of construction materials or byproducts, including but not limited to paint, plaster, or chemical solutions is allowed in the Tree Protection Zone. 5. Where mulch is required, show the mulch area and indicate mulch materials and depth. 6. Include notes or measures to maintain andlor improve the health of the protected Heritage Trees, such as schedule of watering during construction, deadwood removal, pest management or other practices. Utilities: 1. Show location of proposed utility lines (above and below grade) and width, depth, and method of tunneling or digging any proposed trenches. 2. Show point of connection for utilities and controllers. GradinglDrainage: 1. Show width and location of all existing or proposed drainage easements and watercourses; indicate drainage structures. 2. Show existing and proposed contour lines. Structures: 1. Outline and label all existing or proposed structures (including walls, fences, etc.), drawn to scale, and shown in their exact location. 2. Indicate location, width, and depth of all trenches for footings including excavations for any subsurface improvement. Irrigation: 1. Indicate location, width, depth and method of tunneling or digging of proposed trenches for irrigation lines (mainlines and lateral lines) effecting protected Heritage Trees. Photographs: 1. Provide photograph of protected Heritage Trees that shows the form and orientation on the property, as well as the conditions on the site. Heritage Trees on adjacent properties must also be identified on the plan. 2. Photographs must be labeled with the property address (or Assessor's Parcel Number (APN), date, and keyed to a site plan showing the viewpoint in which the photograph was taken. 14 "DRAFT" Heritage Tree Policy 102204 HERITAGE TREE INVENTORY LISTING rw~fid~'r 25r;~tfu8fiBR "'__"'~"~M,"~~_;'-;';;~','~"",_~_,_"",_'~~'~~__" 15