Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04202022 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA APRIL 20, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairperson Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Ruiz ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of March 16, 2022Recommendation: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda April 20, 2022 Action MinutesAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision . Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Planning Application No. PA21-0838, a Development Plan for a 237-unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres; and PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road, Scott Cooper Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0838, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 237-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY BUILT ON 27.5 ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF EQUITY DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0839, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 38121) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR THE CREATION OF ONE (1) RESIDENTIAL LOT, TWO (2) OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND ONE (1) Recommendation: Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda April 20, 2022 2.95 ACRE LOT FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY DEDICATION LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF EQUITY DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions - Development Plan Plan Reductions - Tentative Tract Map PC Resolution - Development Plan Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution - Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Fiscal Impact Analysis Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, May 4, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MARCH 16, 2022 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chair Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Bob Hagel ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio (absent), Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT – None CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Hagel. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of March 2, 2022 BUSINESS 2 Long Range Planning Project No. LR22-0216, General Plan Consistency Review for an Amendment to the Fiscal Years 2022-26 Capital Improvement Program, Mark Collins Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-06 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2022-2026 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (“CIP”) TO ADD FIVE PROJECTS TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-0216) 2 Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. PUBLIC HEARING 3. Planning Application No. PA21-1442, Home Product Review for Planning Area 31A of the Roripaugh Ranch Specific Plan to allow for three (3) unique detached single-family plans with four (4) architectural styles consisting of 81 lots, Jaime Cardenas Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-07 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-1442, HOME PRODUCT REVIEW FOR PLANNING AREA 31A OF THE RORIPAUGH RANCH SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW FOR THREE (3) UNIQUE DETACHED SINGLE-FAMILY PLANS WITH FOUR (4) ARCHITECTURAL STYLES CONSISTING OF 81 LOTS AND MAKING FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND ADDENDA AND DETERMINING THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO SECTION 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Hagel, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 4. Planning Application No. PA21-1470, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 38,714 square foot industrial building located on the north side of Avenida Alvarado, approximately 525 feet east of Via Industria (APNs: 909-290-051, 909-290-052), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Continuance off-calendar to a date to be determined. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 5. Planning Application No. PA21-1471, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 19,727 square foot industrial building located on the north side of Avenida Alvarado, approximately 275 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-050), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Continuance off-calendar to a date to be determined. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 3 6. Planning Application No. PA21-1472, a Development Plan for the construction of an approximately 9,867 square foot industrial building located on the south side of Avenida Alvarado, approximately 600 feet east of Via Industria (APN: 909-290-011), Scott Cooper Recommendation: Continuance off-calendar to a date to be determined. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 6:38 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, April 6, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Gary Watts, Chairperson Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: April 20, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA21-0838, a Development Plan for a 237-unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres; and PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: AHV Communities General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Harveston Specific Plan (SP-13) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) South: Commercial Center / Service Commercial (SC) East: Ynez Road, Industrial Buildings / Industrial Park (IP) West: Vacant Land, Date Street Right of Way / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI), Service Commercial (SC) 2 Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Parking Provided/Required: 675 Parking Spaces 474 Parking Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY On December 1, 2020, the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan was approved by the City Council. As part of that Specific Plan Amendment a Residential Overlay area was established which allows for the development of up to 1,000 residential units on an 87.54-acre portion of Planning Area 12. On June 16, 2021, AHV Communities submitted Planning Application No. PA21-0838, a Development Plan for a 237-unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres; and PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project is located in the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan on 27.5 acres. The project proposes 237 single family homes ranging in size from 1,410 square feet to 1,857 square feet. The proposed architecture, plotting, landscaping, and walls and fences were reviewed for conformance with the development standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan. The vehicular access to the project is from two separate locations. The main entry which leads directly into the private recreation center is a right in, left in, and right out on Ynez Road and the secondary entry is located at the end of the future extension of Equity Drive which will be constructed as part of this project. Both entrances have vehicular and pedestrian gates for access. Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the project is required to provide 474 enclosed parking spaces and does not require any uncovered/guest parking. The project proposes 474 enclosed parking spaces within the single-family home garages as well as an additional 201 uncovered/guest parking spaces spread throughout the project. Community Amenities Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the residents of residential projects developed within the Residential Overlay Area will not have access to the existing private recreational center within Harveston. Each residential development within the overlay shall provide private recreation areas. The project contains a wealth of community amenity spaces that include: • An approximately 2,759 square foot private recreation center building that includes a fitness center, restrooms, kitchen, covered patios, breezeway, bike racks and a dog wash. 3 • Pool area at the private recreation center that includes a BBQ area, fireplace, and seating/dining areas. • Central recreation areas that include game tables with benches, bocce ball, cornhole, and open turf play areas with decomposed granite paths, picnic shelter with tables and grills. • Tot lot In addition to the community amenities the project also offers three (3) different “loops” that can be used for walking and exercise along the sidewalks. There is an outer loop on the outside of the private loop road that is 0.77 miles, an inner loop on the inside of the private loop rood that is 0.42 miles, and a paseo loop around the amenity areas that is 0.38 miles. Architecture The project proposes three (3) architectural styles throughout the project. The architectural styles include Spanish, Craftsman, and Cottage, which are consistent with the Resid ential Architectural Guidelines specified in the Harveston Specific Plan Design Guidelines. Staff believes that, with the attached Conditions of Approval, the project meets the intent of the Harveston Specific Plan. The proposed elevations achieve a quality appearance, are compatible with the surrounding existing and proposed residential neighborhoods and provide variety along the streetscape and within the internal residential area. The applicant has provided specific details that are unique to each propo sed architectural style and elevation. Each of the three proposed styles is distinct through the use of materials and with articulation provided on elevations of the homes. The architectural elements and materials that work to achieve this character are defined below for each specific style: • Spanish: “S” shape concrete roof tiles, decorative Spanish tile, front to back main gable roof, 4:12 roof pitch, and clay pipes • Craftsman: stone columns, porch, vertical upper mullioned windows with divided light, horizontal lap siding, and board and batten gable ends • Cottage: 6:12 roof pitch, shutters, brick accents, hipped roof, 12” roof overhangs, and flat concrete roof tiles Elevations located in an area that are visible to the public shall be enhanced. Instead of having specific enhanced elevations for the buildings located along Date Street, Ynez Road, and the internal loop road staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that the standard elevations are enhanced in order to provide a quality street scene along those corridors. Additional enhanced elevations are proposed on the homes in specific locations where those elevations are visible to the public from recreation areas, public streets, and interior private streets. Landscaping While there is not a minimum landscape coverage percentage within the Residential Overlay the project does propose an abundance of landscaping within the landscape development zones along Date Street and Ynez Road, in the recreational areas, along the parkways of the interior loop road and within the alleys to soften the massing of the buildings. Plant types used throughout the project include crape myrtle, bradford pear, southern magnolia, purple leaf plum, kangaroo paw, and boston ivy. 4 Tentative Tract Map The Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes proposes the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95-acre lot for street and highway dedication on 27.5 acres. The TTM does not propose individual residential lots but instead one (1) residential condominium lot for all of the single-family residences. Growth Master Plan/Community Amenities On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Action Plan (GMP) which is intended to serve as the City Council’s policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures in the City of Temecula. The GMP applies when projects involve specific land use decisions including General Plan Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments. Consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the previously approved Specific Plan Amendment (PA18-0660) contains requirements for all future residential projects within the Residential Overlay to provide Community-wide public benefits that provide substantial added value to the entire community and citizens of Temecula commensurate with the scope of the project to fulfill the requirements of the City’s GMP. The Community-wide public benefit, as determined by the City Council Ad Hoc Infill Land Use and Project Review Subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Maryann Edwards and James Stewart, for the project is a $665,000.00 payment to the City of Temecula which will in turn be used by the City of Temecula for city-wide projects that benefit the residents of the City. The payment shall be made prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit for the project. Fiscal Impact Analysis The City’s fiscal policies requires that a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) be completed for any development that proposes an increase in residential density from what is currently allowed in the General Plan. The previously approved General Plan Amendment (PA18-0659) changed the land use of the Residential Overlay from Service Commercial (SC) to Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to allow for future residential development. However, it was unknown, at the time, the size of the residential projects that would be proposed so it was not possible to prepare an FIA without individual projects to analyze. The Harveston Specific Plan, as amended, requires that any residential projects within the Residential Overlay prepare a FIA. The Harveston Specific Plan provides that the FIA is to evaluate the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the project by estimating the fiscal impact on the General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed project over a 20-year time period. If the FIA determines that the increased cost to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the project area will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the project (“City Services Deficit”), the project shall be conditioned to require the payment of funds to the City for negative impact on the General Fund, that is, the project shall be conditioned to pay the City the loss to General Fund revenues created by the project as determined by the FIA. Here, the applicant prepared a FIA in compliance with this requirement. The FIA found that the project would result in a City Services Deficit. The project is being conditioned to require that the owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of Eighty Four Dollars ($84.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen percent (17.0%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism 5 that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Specific Plan area for building permits for residential construction have been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. The project condition provides that the Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on April 7, 2022, and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003, by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020, in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found 6 not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The applications for a development plan for a 237-unit single family residential community and tentative tract map for one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication are consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a single family residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a single family residential community at the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Tentative Tract Map, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the Residential Overlay of the Harveston Specific Plan is 1,000. The proposed project proposes the creation of (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95-acre lot for street and highway dedication. As such, the total number of residential units proposed as part of this project and previously approved within the Residential Overlay are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements 7 of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Harveston Specific Plan. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been subject to any Williamson Act contracts. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Residential Overlay within the Harveston Specific Plan which allows for 1,000 residential units. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 1,000 residential units. The Tentative Map for Condominium Purposes will allow for the development of single family homes that results in under 1,000 total residential units as part of this project and previously approved within Planning Area 12. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020, in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone (EIR No. SCH# 2019070974). The SEIR identified seven (7) areas where no impacts were discovered. These areas are: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, and Wildfire. The analysis identified seven (7) areas where impacts were not considered to be significant. These areas include: Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems. The SEIR recommended feasible mitigation measures for environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact in the following areas: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted in connection with the SEIR. Consequently, the Tentative Map, which implements the second amendment to the 8 Harveston Specific Plan, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, based on the analysis in the SEIR. In addition, while the SEIR identified Air Quality as creating significant and unavoidable impacts, in accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted stating that the significant adverse project effects are acceptable because the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the City Council adopted Findings of Facts in Support of Findings that identify that, with respect to Air Quality, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR. The Findings of Fact in Support of Findings are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Because the Tentative Map implements the Harveston Specific Plan as amended, these same considerations and findings apply here. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or coolin g opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lot, open spaces lots and street and highway dedication lot will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project. 9 ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions – Development Plan 3. Plan Reductions – Tentative Tract Map 4. PC Resolution – Development Plan 5. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 6. PC Resolution – Tentative Tract Map 7. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 8. Fiscal Impact Analysis 9. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA 10. Notice of Determination 11. Notice of Public Hearing HARVEST O N D R YNEZRDWINCHESTER RDEQUITY DR MA D I S O N A V E JEFFERSON AVE DATE STCOUNTYCENTERDRProject Site CITY O F TEMEC ULA PA21-0838 \Date Created: 3/21/2022 1:6,2001 inch = 517 feet 916-400 -066 The map PA21-0838.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis !"#$15 Te m e c u la , C A Development Plan Submittal AHV COMMUNITIES PA2l-0838 02/14/22 Kevin L. Crook I ~ Architect o: Inc ;; PLANNING • ARCHITECTURE P R A D O A-1 Project Summary A-32 Plan 2X - Roof Plans L-1 Overall Landscape Plan A-2 Conceptual Site Plan A-33 Plan 3A - Floor Plan L-2 Overall Landscape Plan A-3 Enhanced Elevation Locations A-34 Plan 3A - Spanish Elevations L-3 Recreation Enlargements A-4 Phasing Plan A-35 Plan 3A - Spanish Enhanced Elevation L-4 Project Entry Enlargements & Pedestrian Connectivity Plan A-5 Existing Site Photos A-36 Plan 3B - Cottage Elevations L-5 Wall and Fence Plan A-37 Plan 3B - Cottage Enhanced Elevation L-6 Wall and Fence Plan A-6 Typical Home Cluster A-38 Plan 3C - Craftsman Elevations A-7 View from Street B A-39 Plan 3C - Craftsman Enhanced Elevation C-1 Title Sheet and Sections A-8 View from Ynez Road A-40 Plan 3 - Roof Plans C-2 Product Placement Plan C-3 Product Placement Plan A-9 Plan l A - Floor Plan A-41 Plan 4A - Floor Plan C-4 Conceptual Grading Plan A-10 Plan l A - Spanish Elevations A-42 Plan 4A - Spanish Elevations C-5 Conceptual Grading Plan A-11 Plan l A - Spanish Enhanced Elevation A-43 Plan 4A - Spanish Enhanced Elevation C-6 Preliminary Utility Plan A-12 Plan l B - Cottage Elevations A-44 Plan 4B - Cottage Elevations C-7 Preliminary Utility Plan A-13 Plan l B - Cottage Enhanced Elevation A-45 Plan 4B - Cottage Enhanced Elevation A-14 Plan l C - Craftsman Elevations A-46 Plan 4C - Craftsman Elevations TTM Tentative Tract Map A-15 Plan l C - Craftsman Enhanced Elevation A-47 Plan 4C - Craftsman Enhanced Elevation A-16 Plan l - Roof Plans A-48 Plan 4 - Roof Plans E-0.l Sheet Index & General Notes E-0.2 Abbreviations & Symbols List A-17 Plan 2A - Floor Plan A-49 Style Guide E-1. l Site Lighting Plan - Area A A-18 Plan 2A - Spanish Elevations A-50 Written Color Schemes E-1.2 Site Lighting Plan - Area B A-19 Plan 2A - Spanish Enhanced Elevation A-51 Carriage Lights and Exterior Doors E-1.3 Site Lighting Plan - Area C A-20 Plan 2B - Cottage Elevations A-52 Garage Doors E-1.4 Site Photometric - Area A A-21 Plan 2B - Cottage Enhanced Elevation E-1.5 Site Photometric - Area B A-22 Plan 2C - Craftsman Elevations A-53 Leasing Office/Recreational Center - Foor Plan E-1.6 Site Photometric - Area C A-23 Plan 2C - Craftsman Enhanced Elevation A-54 Leasing Office/Recreational Center - Bevations E-1.7 Lighting Specification A-24 Plan 2 - Roof Plans A-55 Leasing Office/Recreational Center - Bevations A-56 Leasing Office/Recreational Center - Roof Plan A-25 Plan 2XA - Floor Plan A-57 Written Color Scheme A-26 Plan 2XA - Spanish Elevations A-27 Plan 2XA - Spanish Enhanced Elevation A-28 Plan 2XB - Cottage Elevations A-29 Plan 2XB - Cottage Enhanced Elevation A-30 Plan 2XC - Craftsman Elevations A-31 Plan 2XC - Craftsman Enhanced Elevation TA B LE O F C O N TEN TS AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ~ COMMUN1T1Es Temecula. CA Inc ~ P ro p e rty In fo rm a ti o n D e s ig n Te a m P ro le c t S u m m a ry • APN: 916-400-0 51, 916-400-052, 916-400-0 53, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067, • Street Address: None • Existing Land Use: Vacant • Proposed Land Use: Residential • General Plan Designation: SPI • Zoning Designation: Harveston Specif- ic Plan • Existing Specific Plan Designation: Service Commercial with Residential Overlay • Property Owner: CRP/AHV Prado Owner, LLC a Delaware limited liability company Contact: Spencer Rinker 150 Paularino Ave, Suite D250 Costa Mesa, CA 92625 Ph: (949) 892-9110 • Applicant: CRP/AHV Prado Owner, LLC a Delaware limited liability company Contact: Spencer Rinker 150 Paularino Ave, Suite D250 Costa Mesa, CA 92625 Ph: (949) 892-9110 • Architect: Kevin L. Crook Architect Contact: Jeff Addison 1360 Reynolds Avenue Suite l l O Irvine, CA 92614 Ph: (949) 660-1587 • Civil Engineer: SB&O, Inc, Contact: Daniel J. O'Rourke, P.E. 41689 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 126 Temecula, CA 92590 Ph: (951) 695-8900 • Landscape Architect: Contact: David Neault David Neault Associates. Inc. 41877 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 140 Temecula. CA 92590 (951) 296-3430 • Photometric: Gouvis Group Contact: torrv Cavanaugh, PE 15 Studebaker Irvine, CA 92618 Ph: (949) 590-9006 • Total Gross Site Area: 27 .5 • Total Net Site Area: 23.0 Acres • Gross Density: 8.6 Homes/ Acre • Net Density: l 0.3 Homes/ Acre • Number of Homes: 237 • Building Coverage: 264.053 S.F. • Gross Building Area: 476.480 S.F. • Occupancy: R-3 • Type of Construction: V-B • Sprinkler System: NFPA 13D Bulldlng Type and Plan Mix SFD Cluster • Plan l (1,878 s.f.): 56 Homes • Plan 2 (1,948 s.f.): 112 Homes • Plan 3 (2,068 s.f.): 46 Homes • Plan 4 (2,299 s.f.): 23 Homes Open Space Summary Common Open Space Required per SP: 250 per unit x 237 = 59,250 S.F. Common Open Space Provided: 92,025 (388 S.F. per Unit) 2.1 Acres Private Open Space Required per SP: • 250 S.F. per Specific Plan Private Open Space Provided: • Plan l: 367 S.F. (Min.) • Plan 2: 368 S.F. (Min.) • Plan 3: 400 S.F. (Min.) • Plan 4: 420 S.F. (Min.) Vicinity Map ) . ½ Q Project location h11p1,:/lopc11,utt1map.ori,:/l'Opyri~1 ht1pS:/lopellstrtt1mapmg Copyright Opc11S1re,:,tM:t.p and ~un1ribwirs, undo:r :m open bcense P R O JE C T SU M M A R Y AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ COMMuN1T1Es Temecula. CA A-1 Inc P ro p e rty In fo rm a tio n : ~;,, PLAN4 1857S.F. PLA N 2 PLAN3 1647S.F. PLAN2 1520S.F. PLAN 1 ~ 1410 S.F. l/3Z': 1' Typical Cluster with Setbacks I I I ( -< z ~ ~ t Intended Occupa ncy : R3 Totor Building Sguore Footage Target: LIV ABLE S.F. + Percent Q2r2g_~_ on Site 1,878 23% 1.948 48% 2.068 19% 2,298 10% p~ l 1,410 2 1.520 1,647 H~~z Num ber on Site TotolS.F. 5' 101.412 114 222,072 46 95,128 23 52.877 237 .471,489 1,609 AVG. 2.048 AVG. 100% APN: 916-400--051. 916-400--052. 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916--400-066. 916-400-067 Ex isting Zoning: Horveston SP. Residential Overlay Proposed Zoning: Horveston SP, Residential Overlay Land Use Type: Residential. Medium 2 Num ber of storie s: 2 Project Summary: \ Net Area: 23.0 ACRES Easements: 2.9 ACRES W.Q Basin: 1.6 ACRES Total Area: 27.5 ACRES Total Units: 237 Grass Density: 237 UNITS/ 27.5 ACRES= 8.6 DU/AC Net Density: 237 UNITS/ 23.0 ACRES= 10.3 DU/AC R/W 60' R/W ! ~ SIDEW ALK· 12 · a· SIDEW ALK 1/16'"= 1 Proposed Street Section 24' Clear unobstructed roadway width for fire access •open Space: Common: Required: 250 S.F. per unit x 237 = 59,250 S.F. Provided: 92,025 S.F. Private: Required: 250 S.F. per unit Provided: Plan 1: 367 S.F. (Min.) Plan 2: 368 S.F. (Min.) Plan 3: 400 S.F. (Min.) Plan 4: 420 S.F. (Min.) ffi 0 50 100 20 0 .. ..._,..x"· / • ~EXSrDRM DRAIN ✓ EASEMENT 1.S1 1c plon ii l01 c o nc cp 1.,or l)<,ff>Ol.e ,ont,. 2. s,tc:,ot,r,m.,i 1:>e rcvicwcd oV l)lo ........ t>ulOlllg.0<KJ rn:oc oar1 me n11 lo,c ooc c omplo,,c c . J. io<c ln lo<mo "'"'pc ,por cclmo o. ~- Cirlcr,gt,,ccrrcvc,ilyollic1ooc;t1cr"ldg,,oaonglnT01morior,. s.s .. lldl:'>gf-ocl~l<"'°VCl'l<lt9CCluCIClr.clnolQC<igr,clcvdcn,T)'ic. ¢. c se e i=c crcc is •~oi<=ct 10 cnon 11<:. 1, 1-,kli:ng 1ct~k1 ore =cwr cd lrom O<OQC rty I~, Tc bu ola h g 10.,noaclonlr'lcs. \ \ ~.· WATER QUALITY BASIN AND OF?AINACE DISCHARGE LOCATION WATER QUALITY BASIN ANO ORA/NACE 0/SCHARG[ LOCATION "Parking: Required: 2 Car Garage Guest 474 Stalls OStalls Total Provided: 2 Car Garage Head-in Spaces Parallel Spaces 474 Stalls 474 35 166 Total 675 Spaces (2.8:l Overall) C O N C E P T U A L S ITE PLA N * Requirements derived trcm scccrrc pion Porting ~1oB c;iimen~on~: • Heod-in ~tol: 9' it 18" -Porollelsfol!:8'it22' AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMUN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-2 Inc ;; * Note: ls'efe, to lonoscope Pion fOf wollcwov ,..,o / ) ~!, Le g end - Enhanced Elevations PLAN4 1857S.F. PLAN2 PLANJ 1647 S.F. PLAN2 1520S.F. PLAN 1 ~ 1410S.F. 1/32"• l' Typical Cluster with Setbacks I I I ( -< z m N ~ > C ,, I \ ® 0 50 100 20 0 \ \ \ WATER OUAU TY BASIN AND DRAINAGE DISCHARGE LOCA noN ,.,._,. ><". / .:~[X $TORM DRAIN EASEMENT l.Si:cl)lor'l lllorc011C cp1vol~c1ort,. 2. Sire olon """' ee rcvicwccl ov ~/lino.~- r..: oc i:,ort mc "r. fo,c oae c omi:,lanc c . 3.&o<c ln l01 m c11io n ,:,e,p o";cl ma o . ◄. CMcr,gir,e mtovcn!vollCIC>ccle!onagrodlng inlormolion S.lkAloii'IQ Foolp,i,,t1moycr'lar1QCO•"'tolhclinalocslgnclcvotion>1ytc. 6. Open1pacc0<coi11uc,jcctI0c~ongc 1. ~=::~~:1 ore mco,~rcd r,o,,, p,opc,r!v llr'lel ,o t.>ulkllng \ \ ·~.· WATER QUALITY BASIN AND DRAINAGE DISCHARGE LOCAnON ENHANCED ELEVATION LOCATIONS AHV PRADO Kevinl.Crook P A2 l -0838 02/ 1 4/22 Architect C O M M U N 1T 1E s Temecula. CA A-3 Inc ~!, ,,J: ~'-\·,,.\ '\ ~ /,.· ' -< z m N ::0 0 Ei " \ © \'~ ': . ,,;"/ ((: . .>/ ~·!! :11 ·.~;. ,,n1 ', .. ,.·.-.:7 0 SO 100 20 0 1. Si:cQO\lslofco.-.:.coh,alJ)UrPOICICIO'W. '2.S ile i:,lo n f"l,JS :~,,;:vicwc a ~l'.lb mh;.l:lutit',g.o roa ~oc oor tme nrs 1o ,cooe co,npic:in,;c l. ;!ol cO'l!o,,no rionDCr por cclrno o ,. CM c"l)O'le ortovc,..,.,.ol sclooe tsol'ld g,Oding inlormo licr,,. 5. a..101rioFooll)firlT!mcrvcr,,a"9COuC!OIP\Cflncldc:signclcvo,1cm11.,.;e ~- Op,:n1l)O<;.c orcols1y*,;tloct,ongc 1. ~~~-:~~:_i OIC: "'CO~ICO t,om o,opertv lhCl ·o ~r,g P H A S IN G P LA N AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~i~~~ c o v Mu N1T1 Es Temecula, CA A-4 Inc N O R T H W E S T C O R N E R LO O K IN G EA S T N O R T H W E ST C O R N E R SO U T H W E S T C O R N E R SO U T H W E ST C O R N E R 2 EQ U ITY D R IV E LO O K IN G W E ST EQ U IT Y D R IV E LO O K IN G SO U TH A E R IA L S IT E P H O TO Y N E Z R O A D LO O K IN G N O R TH EX IS T IN G S IT E P H O T O S AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ C O M M U N IT IE S Temecula.CA A-5 Inc PLA N 4 "A " 4 BEDROOM, 3 BA TH 1,858 SQ. FT. PLAN 2 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,520 SQ. FT. PLAN 3 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,647 SQ. FT. PLAN 2 "XA" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,520 SQ. FT. i:;> ,-. --0 ~ __ _J L .. PLAN 2 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,520 SQ. FT. PLAN 3 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,647SQ.FT. PLAN 2 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,520 SQ. FT. PLAN 1 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH 1,410SQ.FT. TYPICAL 8 HOME CLUSTER SCALE: 3/3'Z'=1'-IJ ' AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA;c~it~~~ E COMM u N, T1 ES Temecula. CA A-6 Inc :;; P L A N 2 X C • C R A F T S M A N P L A N I A • S P A N IS H P L A N 2 X B - C O TT A G E P L A N IC · C R A F T S M A N VIEW FROM STREET B - (UNITS 222-237) PLAN IA· SPANISH PLAN 2B • COTTAGE PLAN IC· CRAFTSMAN PLAN 2XB • COTTAGE VIEW FROM STREET B - (UNITS 172-169) NOTES -REFER TO SITE PLAN/ PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN FOR STREET SCENE LOCATION -REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR WALL, TREE, AND SHRUB LOCATIONS AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ co MM u NIT IE s Temecula, CA A-? Inc ; P L A N 2 B - C O TT A G E P L A N 4 A - S P A N IS H P L A N 2 C - C R A F T S M A N P L A N 4 A - S P A N I S H P L A N 2B - COTTAGE VIEW FROM YNEZ ROAD - (UNITS 53-69) NOTES -REFER TO SITE PLAN/ PRODUCT PLACEMENT PLAN FOR STREET SCENE LOCATION -REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR WALL. TREE. AND SHRUB LOCATIONS AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ E COMMuNIT ES Temecula.CA A-8 Inc ;; ,,.,., rr------,;:- -=o3:i,------,• □~□ C::=J ------------------ □. r7 LG3 Gl ELJ n:7 Ll=J ED ' ' ~, ,Gl UJ ~ 40'-0" --··--··--··7 ··--··--··--··--·· 10'-0" Ii - I I , I :?: ~,~ I I I r,~---:~~ L~\J [~ [~ [~ o.J~FcPrn ~ " t;,I 5'-0" M ' ' ' ' ,/ ~ ''' ' ' 22'-10" 7'-'Z' "' ~ 10'-0" PLAN 1 AREA TABULATION []J I I[[] COND1HONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA SECOND FLOOR AREA lOTAL DWELLING UNCONDITIONED SPACE 525 SQ. FT, 885 SQ. n 1.410 so. n SECOND FLOOR PLAN CLUSTE R FIRST FLOOR PLAN CARACE PORCH 468 SO. n. 61 SO. FT. PLAN "All 3 BEDRO OM, 2.5 BATH 0 2 4 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ co MM u N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-9 Inc @2020 Kevin L. Crook. Architect, Inc. Refer to londscope drawings fOf wall, tree, and !.hrub locations LEFT ,1110G.IICJ. --------------~ MATERIALS LEGEND (WIOE OCC URS J FRONT DOOR: FIBEil:CLASS GARAGE DOOR: MElAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: S!MULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FRONT j ~ i-:1F ~! I - i!_ CJ □ D □ . □ □ CJ ½U· . "~''"' I • -- .. El□ RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME I PLAN 1 "A" SPANISH - ELEVATIONS REAR N01(:l<(f!'.R10Sll["IAN ~WJ.:Sf'./>LANSMAY OCCURQN::JI(. I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ COMMUNITIES Temecula. CA A-lO Inc MA TE RIA LS LEG EN D ('M£11E 0CC Ul!S J FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE"$'' TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOO D CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STlJCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW SOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTE RS: SIMULATED WOO D POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICIC CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM RIG H T COLOR SCHEME 1 PLAN 1 "A" SP A N IS H - EN H A N C E D ELE V A T IO N i!W~l~y~- I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA;c~it~~~ c o M M u N 1T 1E s Temecula. CA A-11 Inc © 2020 Kevin L. Crook Architect. Inc. RelH to landscape drawings for wall. tree, ond mtub locations LEFT MATERIALS LEGEND l~OCCUIIS) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GAAAGEDOOR: METALSECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEV KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GA.BL£ END: WROUGHT IRON WA.LL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINn W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER FRONT ~ [] [J D □ □ □ . CJ [J RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 4 PLAN l "B" COTTAGE - ELEVATIONS REAR ~~(T~~yrv.N· OCC IJR ON 511 ( I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ co>.1MuN1T,ES Temecula.CA A-l2 Inc :;;; MA TERIA LS LEG EN D (W>1El!EOC:CIH!S] FRONT DOOR: RBERGLASS GARAGE OOOlt METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROO F EXT ENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON W ALL : STU CC O WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTT ERS: SIM ULA TED W O O D POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER RIGHT COLOR SCHEME 4 PLA N 1 "B " COTTAGE - ENHANCED ELEVATION g~~~,!yf'W<. OCCUR ON.Sn(: 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E CCMMuN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-13 Inc :;;; ©2020 Kevin L. Crool:: Architect, Inc. Rel0f to k:mdscope drowlngs for won, tree. ond shrub occuons LEFT ,PAOO._l_tGT. j_l)l,o.,. ~H +lj O • 1- 2~ .;. MATERIALS LEGEND lwtl(ld OC CUfGJ FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ ICNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: BOARD ANO BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST ANO BEAM FRONT [J D [JJ □· [] □· [J ~ . RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 1 "C" CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATIONS REAR iv'!i~(~t-· 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMUt<1T1Es Temecula. CA A-14 Inc :;;; MA T E R IA LS LEGEND IW IEld OC cui.-:.J FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF; COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTE RS: SIM ULA TE D W OO D POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST AND BEAM RIG H T COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 1 "C" C R A F T S M A N - E N H A N C E D E L E V A T IO N ~IE:11Ef"ER10:.ll(l'lAN - f(('VfflSl:f>t.,,,J,GMAY OCCUll'ON:JTE. 12 AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ c O M M u N I r, Es Temecula. CA A- l 5 Inc ;; r-------------- ' ' ' j ~~ ~~ -------- L'.:::,. 5:12 ' 5:12 : "'7'! ' I --------~ ::~l : "C7 ' ' ' ' ' ' I- -- I _____ _J ' ' ' ' ' ! ' ______ j 4;12 r -- ! l ~N ! \J~ : ' i ! ' -➔ L'.:::,. 5:12 ~~ 5:12 "C7 --------~ l"----i : l . ,, l- _: J ' ! I 4:12 "A " - S P A N IS H "B " - C O TTA G E "C " - C R A FTSM A N RO OF PLA NS PLAN 0 2 4 8 12 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMUNITIES Temecula.CA A-l6 Inc :; __ 40'~0_" - .. -- .. -- .. 7 . . -- . . -- . . r,-------,;:tii •""• ii~,-------,7 □ Ii B&O,~+ □ □ 1~ I I , I '?. '0 6'-6" I ~ I ½> ::; C~] □ ~~-cB~~I c................. DI ... -~ ~ ' ' E;97 EU ~ U=1 ED . , u n GREAT RM. O"' 0 c~~~J d7E) ~ W'"CHENrl~ ~I I~ .... , [::=~-: [_.::-: ~1 IEn ~ qJ "' ,:. ~ 9 !': 9 °' ~~ 20'-11" 7'-T' 6'-6" PLAN 2 A REA TA BU LA TIO N COND!HONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA SECOND FLOOR AREA TO TAL DW(L LING UNCONDITIONED SPACE 617 SO, FT. 903 SO. FT. 1,520 SO, FT. CARAC ( 42B so. n. SEC O N D FLO O R PLA N C L U STE R PLAN 2 "A" 3 BE D R O O M , 2.5 BA TH FIRST FLO O R PLAN 0 2 4 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ~ coMMuN1T1Es Temecula. CA A-l? Inc :; © 2020 Kevin L. Crook Afchilect, Inc. Refer to landscape drawings for wen, tree, enc shrvb locotlons FRONT MATERIALS LEGEND (WlER:fOC.CU~! FRONT DOOR: ABERGlASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE '"S" Tllf ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: :b:6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL; STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CA? TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FO AM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM RIGHT o:-7' :;:f' 2 ~ i I ~ I ~.t ,-----. a■ CJ ED ' . . CJ []· . ; □ EI] CJ [J . . ■ EJD REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 2 PLAN 2 "A" SPANISH - ELEVATIONS LEFT NCl l(;lltf (ltl05fl(PLAN · ~i1$1:PI..ANSMA1 OC CUR ON Zl!C I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ C O M M U N 1T 1E s Temecula.CA A-l8 Inc MA TE RIA LS LEG EN D /W H :'-'f ~) FRONT DOOR: ABERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S~ TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTT ERS: SIM ULA TED W O O D POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM REAR COLOR SCHEME 2 PLAN 2 "A " SPANISH - ENHANCED ELEVATION N01E:il□'£ll:IO:.ll(f>LAN. R(VfF:'..CF't.ANSMAY OC CVII ON '.-11( 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ~ co MM u N, T, Es Temecula. CA A-19 Inc ; ©20 20 t::e v ln L. C roo k Af C h llec l. Inc . I Refer ,o landscape drawings !or wall. tree, and shrub locations FRONT REAR MATERIALS LEGEND (W,t:111.0CCURS) FRONT DOOR: RBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONA.!. ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGlES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD SARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END; WROUGHT IRON WAU: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GROS WINDOW BOX: SJMUlATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER RIGHT [J ED CJD [] [] CJ 1.7 ~· CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 5 PLAN 2 "B" COTTAGE - ELEV.A.TIONS LEFT NOU::I/H[l110Sf![ J'\.AN · IIE'll:t/SEl'\.NG1'V-T <X:CURON fJlf. 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ COMMUN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-20 Inc MA T E R IA LS LE G E N D IWl½lrCOCCUkS! FRONT DOOR: FISERGLASS G ARA G E DO O R: Mf TAl SECTIO NAL ROOF: COMPOSmoN SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x 6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON WAU.: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTT ERS : SIM ULA TED W OO D POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER REA R COLOR SCHEME 5 PLAN 2 "B" C O TT A G E - EN H A N C E D ELE V A TIO N ~Jf~~~rily~- tX:C \!~ ON ~f. 12 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E COMMuN1T,ES Temecula,CA A-21 Inc :;; © 2020 Kevin L. crcce Architect, Inc. I Reier to londscope drowings for woll. tree. ond shrub sccctcru FRONT MATERIALS LEGEND IW11(1(!.0CC:Ul6l FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD SARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: BOARD ANO BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST AND BEAM RIGHT , I :--;-- ~ 0- ;.,.1 ~ i r7 r7 LLJ L.;_J ---I CJ [] DD r-7~ ~ 7i_J REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2 "C" CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATIONS LEFT NO l(:ROt:~ IOW (PLAN - ~~~(M.A.l 12 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~/t~~~ E c OM MU NtT· Es Temecula. CA A-22 Inc :; r· '.7i~ ~§ MATERIALS LEGEND (\"'1£kl OC C.VIO I FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GA.RACE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2)(6 WOOD GASLE ENO: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX· SIMULATED WOOD SH UTTE RS: SIM ULA TE D W OO D POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST AND BEAM REAR COLOR SCHEME 8 P L A N 2 "C " CRAFTSMAN - ENHANCED ELEVATION ~1£.:kEHCR!OS/lEl't.AN · RfVf~.,ff'lAfGMAY OCCl.lllON:.11(. I 2 AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E co MM u NI r Ifs Temecula. CA A-23 Inc ; n n ;;u )> ,, ---t (/) s:: )> z ] L'.:::s. 4:12 )> ~s V, ""O )> 4:12 z "7 (/) I CP ;;u 0 0 n ,, 0 ""O ,- ---t )> ---t z )> (/) G) m ~ ;; --------------7 L'.:::s. 4:12 4:12 "7 ' l ----------------7 4:12 40'-0" ··-··-··-··7 ··-··-··-··- rr-----,?i-"" ""-iiil=ir------,1 1:J ,:::~:::1 h.-:d b."'="j ,~ I I , I '?- - c~ '-----------------======~ ~ . . ~,~I[~ I I rul ....... :, ' ' ITJ , . [] ' , I I I I I I I ~P=l . . l 20::;;:·----------------~ 7'-7". ! . 6'-6" ~. ~ [~ [~ u g.~J-1 0 ~~~;1---~ - m ref',,~ "" KIT C HEN I i I l'-6" 1~1 /1 //,/ I c~~ "' § ~ i:;, "- ~11ET7 LEJ ElJ PLAN 2X A R EA TA B U LA TIO N ~11En ~ ~ CONDITIONED SPACE FIRST FLOOR AREA S(CONO FLOOR AREA s11 so. n. 90J SO. FT. 1,520 SO. FT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE SEC O N D FLO O R PLA N C LU STE R PLAN 2X "A" 3 BE D R O O M , 2.5 BA TH FIRST FLO O R PLAN CARAC( PORCH 428 SO. FT. 49 SO. Fl. 0 2 4 12 AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E co MM UN 1T1 ES Temecula, CA A-25 Inc ;;; ©2020 Kevin L CrookAlchllect, Inc. Refer lo londscape drawings tor waU, tree, ond shrub rccctons ♦ LEFT [~-- ~ +<] MATERIALS LEGEND [WtfiE OC C~) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE T TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: Slt..tULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL WI GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM; STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM FRONT I ' 0- 0- ;:I ,---. "7 L__J r:7 L_J OJI ILJ t3 8,:·. CJ~ . . .. ~~- ■ El□ RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 2 PLAN 2X "A" SPANISH - ELEVATIONS REAR NOl(:1100! !OS~Cl'tAN· &"f~~c:>-Y I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ E co"" c", r, Es Temecula. CA A-26 Inc ;;;; MA TE R IA LS LE G E N D f,'ltER:E OC CURS ) FRONT DOOR: FIBERCLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE T TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOO D CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRIC):: CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RJGIO FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM RIG H T COLOR SCHEME 2 PLA N 2X "A " SP A N IS H - EN H A N C E D ELE V A TIO N ~~~~;1!vf'W<• OCCIJRON:al(. I 2 AHV PRADO KevinLCrook "' PA 21 -0838 02/ 1 4122 Architect ~ co MM u N JT, Es Temecula, CA A-27 Inc ;;;: © 2020 Kevin L. Crook Architect, Inc I Reier to londscc::pe drawings l0< wall, tree, and stvub locations LEFT .~~1: __ ~-- ~~ 'Ii ~Q MATERIALS LEGEND IWl'lt~OCCU!tS) FRONT DOOR: ABERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOf EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2-.6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: WROUGHT IRON WAll: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER FROt~T [] □· . CJ □ □ []· D QD ~□ RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 5 PLAN 2X "B" COTTAGE - ELEVATIONS REAR NO i(: ~IJC~ 10 snr rt.AN • ~~&~c'.~,.y I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ cOMMuN1T1ES Temecula.CA A-28 Inc 61.0C.HCT. ~iJ -'I,!; ~! ,!:2L.__ ~t~.:.P. MATERIALS LEGEND /WHl:lll:OC C~l FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHlNGlES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ J:NEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2)(6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW SOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF W OO D TRl/\-1: STUCCO OVER RIGID FO AM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER RIG H T COLOR SCHEME 5 PLA N 2 X "B " C O TT A G E - EN H A N C E D ELE V A TIO N ~,~(~rAN· 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ C O M M u N 1T 1E S Temecula.CA A-29 Inc ©20 20 Ke vin l. Crook Archl!ecl, lnc. Refer tc jcncsccc e drowlngs for wall. tree, and shrub locations LEFT .~~-HG I. MATERIALS LEGEND lWt'clllOC C.1.JIGI FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORSELJ ICNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD SARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BO X: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST ANO SEAM FRONT ij ~ ~,1!:!.,_ ~J..!Q.f, ,;. .:,-, [] □ ' [] □· D □· □ CD· ' rJO RIGHT CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2X "C" CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATIONS REAR ~IE;IIITl:RlOS~(PI.AN - flf:VHtSf f'l.ANS MA Y OCCUIION:.rl( I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ COMMJ>J1T,ES Temecula.CA A-30 Inc MA TE R IA LS LEG E N D jW IIOi:L OC C.7.JJG ) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2'16 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP S!OlNG WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TR1M: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST ANO SEAM RIG H T COLOR SCHEME 8 PLAN 2X "C" C R A F T S M A N - E N H A N C E D E L E V A T IO N ~i~P1~MAN· 12 AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ coMMUN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-31 Inc )> V> -u )> z V> I OJ Al 0 0 n "Tl 0 -0 ,--- _, )> _, z )> V> G) m n n Al )> "T1 _, V> ~ )> z -------------------------- 7 : I i ! ~ 4:12 I I I I I I I I L_ 4:12 -s;::7 I I I I I I I I L _ : /1,: L'i~- 4:12 4:12 -s;::7 I I I i 11; l_ \J ~ 4:12 ! ! ,- -----------:,~--------- -~ 4:12 -s;::7 ih ".t\J L'i~- -~~J 4:12 ato,q.~~.-..2 D' ·E:8 □ c=::J lSJ 40'-0" . . -- . . -- . . -- . . -- . . -- . . -- . . [3~~3 □ SECOND FLOOR PLAN i~ I I , I '?- ~ '0 s·--0 ·· 3()'-(1" [~~] ~ ~~g~ ~ ~ ~ [§n,.f] t ~ ' ' En LU n:7 U=1 ~ . ' ~11En LE EJ ~1 IEn ~ ~ CLUSTE R PLAN 3 "A" 3 BEDROOM, 2.5 BATH "' ~ "' ~ . -l- .. -, .. _ .. , .. -ll>?Dl: 10'-6" -l 9 ;, FIRST FLOOR PLAN PLAN 3 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE rl RST F"LO O R AR EA SEC O N D FLO O R AREA 706 S O . Fl . 941 SD . Fl . TOlAL OW ELLl l'J G 1,647 SO. TT. UNCONDITIONED SPACE CARAGE PO RC H 42 1 SO . n. 37 SO. Fl . 0 2 4 l 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E c: o MM u N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-33 Inc :;;; © 2020 Ke Yin L. Crook Architect, Inc. Reier lo londscope drowings !Of woll, tree, end shrub locolions FRONT MATERIALS LEGEND {Wli(l,:,EOCC~) FRONT DOOR: FISERCLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOf: CONCRETE "S" TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x4 WOOD SARGE: 2:x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULA TED CLAY TILE WAU: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W / GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RJGlO FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM RIGHT I ~l,o., ~~o'.. ~i i l g,L ~ I --1 .t!:l'!q .!,l !'!f ;;_ I Jµ.___ -- --~ CJ . D D . CJ □II□ CDI ICD ~E~J.!..~ El□ REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 3 PLAN 3 "A" SPANISH - ELEVATIONS LEFT ~JrJr~~r"!AN· OC CIJR ON :.IT C. ,. AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ C O M M U N 1T 1E s Temecula. CA A-34 Inc ;; MA Tl:R IA LS LE G E N D [WtlCl1EO::C~) FRONT DOOR: FIBERCLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTE RS : SIM ULA TED W OO D POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER R!GID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER R!G!O FOAM I ~I~ +I; 0 I- ,A'····'·· - , '~ "' REAR COLOR SCHEME 3 PLAN 3 "A" SPANISH - ENHANCED ELEVATION ~~~~yfV,N, 12 A HV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMUNITIES Temecula, CA A-35 Inc ;.: © 2020 Kevin L. Crook Architect, fnc. Rel.;r lo landsccpe drawings for wall, tree, and shrub locations FROt~T °l'~!!?Q.,_HG,~L _ MATERIALS LEGEND jWl"<Ellt:OC:ClllrS) FRONT DOO R: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: MET AL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x.6 WOOD BARGE: 2il6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTT ERS: SIM ULA TED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER RIGHT J ~ !L... - DJ [J D □ . □ □ . . 0 QJ ftNC tllN~ ~ ~□ REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 6 PLA N 3 "B" COTTAGE - ELEVATIONS LEFT NOl~·i(t1-H11(}:il!FI\AN· ~l:\11:k:;El'l,AN:;M-\Y OCCURON!,11~ 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ~ C O M M U N IT IE S Temecula.CA A-36 Inc;;;; '!-81.(K;.HCI. MATERIALS LEGEND (Wl<t'IIEOCCUl!S} FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOS!TION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEV KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: :b:6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER J f-L-- RE A R COLOR SCHEME 6 PLA N 3 "B" C O TT A G E - E N H A N C E D E L E V A T IO N NOit: ~~1110 SUf !'LAN ~~~~~y I 2 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ c o M M u N 1T 1 E S Temecula, C A A-37 Inc ~)2020 Kevin L Crool:: A·chllGCI. Inc. Rel.H' to landscope drowlngs for well, lree. ond shrub locations FRONT i;;': o:i; ~2 ~r~.P. 0- MATERIALS LEGEND (W IIEKI.OC C.VIG ! fRONT DOOR: F18ERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBELi !(NEE BRACE FASCIA: 2:lt6 WOOD SARGE: b6 WOOD GABLE ENO: BOARD ANO BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX· S1MULAlED WOOD SHUTTERS· SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST ANO BEAM RIGHT CJ □ CJ D -----l LJ □ QJ q] REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 9 PLAN 3 "C" CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATIONS LEFT NOl(:l!Cfl:R IO:lll(PV,N · RC\ICR5.l:l'lAl,i!.1Ml OC CU~ON :sHl " AHV PRADO KevinL.Crook P A2 l -0838 02/ 14122 Architect c. -. ,, '"',, N,, e s Temecula. CA A-38 Inc MA T E R IA L S L E G E N D (WIEl!I.OC CUIG I FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENS!ONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD SARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ lAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOO D POT SHELF SIMULATED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST AND BEAM REA R COLOR SCHEME 9 PLAN 3 "C" C R A F T SM A N - EN H A N C E D ELEV A TIO N NQl(;l!£11:1110Sll(PI.AN · ~C\tt ll'.Cf'l..ANS """'T 0CCUi:ONSlll 12 AHV PRA DO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMuN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-39 Inc ; )> (/l 7J )> z (/l I OJ 7J ;aJ r- 0 )> 0 () ,, z 7J 0 ,--- -I ► -I w z )> (/l G) m () () ,0 )> ,, -I (/l ~ )> z ... _ ------------------------------ -----1 ! I I ! I L:::,. 4:12 I I I I I I v ! ___________ j T---'----------------------- ! ! L:::,. 4:12 I I I I i I ! ! --l. 1------------------------ 4:12 "'v"' • I I I I I I __________ _, 42'-0" □ ~a :1: □ 5'--0" 6"-(J' □ ~ □ [Em ' ' ~ U=J 87 EU !tIJ ' ' i~ I I , I '?, ;... I?:J ~, 187 U3 LlJ ~, !En ~ ~ "'I~ [~ i ~;~ I• : L.~ I I 9 .., 0 5'--0" I I ~1 i ~1 I I I ~ I ti E Jr:J N:J' □ rn1 □ 20'-5" PLAN 4 AREA TABULATION CONDITIONED SPACE flRST FLOOR AREA S[CONO fLOOR AREA TOTAL OWELLLNC UNCONDITIONED SPACE 111 so. n. ,.oso so. n. ,.a5-1 so. n. SECOND FLOOR PLAN CLUSTE R PLAN 4 "A" 4 BEDROOM, 3 BATH FIRST FLOOR PLAN GARAGE PORCH ••:1 SO. n. 11 so. n. 0 2 4 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~t ~ co MM u N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-41 Inc ;; ~) 2020 Ke v in L. C roo k. A rc h itec t, In c . Re fer to la n d sc a pe dr a wi n g s !or w a ll, tre e , a n d sh ru b loc o lion s I I FRONT MATERIALS LEGEND fWt-lERfOCCUl!S) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE "S" TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORSEV KNEE BRACE FASCIA: :b.6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: Slt.-tULATED CLAY TILE WAli: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW SOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM RIGHT ~ --1 0- ::-( r7 LJ.d □ . [J , D 638 ~□ REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME I PLAN 4 "A" SPANISH - ELEVATIONS LEFT NOit: l(lf~k 10 ~IE l'lAN ~~~EMM I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ COMMuN1T1Es Temecula. CA A-42 Inc MA TE R IA LS LE G E N D r/lltlERfOCCI.IR$) FRONT DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: CONCRETE"S''TILE ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2xo WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOO D GABLE END: SIMULATED CLAY TILE WAU: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULA TED WOO D POT SHELF STUCCO WITH BRICK CAP TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME l PLAN 4 "A" SPANISH - ENHANCED ELEVATION NOl~:ll'tH~l(>:;l!ff'I./\N· 1/£\IUr.:i:l'l.,O.NS M'IY OC OJ ~ON $11f l 2 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ E co MM a N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-43 Inc ;; © 2020 Kevin L. Crook Afchllect, Inc. Rlefer to landscape drawings lor wall, tree. ond shrub loco!lons FRONT 111.0C.HCT. MATERIALS LEGEND IWrlEllEOCCUe!:) FRONT DOOR: ABERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTION_.L ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBB./ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE END: WROUGHT IRON WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW SOX: SIMULATED WOCO SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOCO POT SHELf WOOD TRU.-1: STUCCO OVER R-CID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER RIGHT 0 ·' J!°' ~2 5,L r97 L:J CJ □□ CJI ICJJ [] □ t~Nfi. [6]0 REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 4 PLAN 4 "B" COTTAGE - ELEVATIONS LEFT NOl~·1<"H~W lO!il!El'!.AN · llt:Vl:k'-A:"1.N',15 ,.,_,.Y OC:C\J~ON 511l I 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~i~~~ COMMJN1T1Es Temecula.CA A-44 Inc MA TE R IA LS LEG EN D ,w"fl!f OC CUR$) FRONT DOOR: A8ERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAL SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITlON SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEV KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2x6 WOOD GABLE ENO: WROUGHT 1RON WALL: STUCCO WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT: STONE VENEER REA R COLOR SCHEME 4 PLAN 4 "B" C O TT A G E - EN H A N C E D ELE V A TIO N NO it· ~Hf.lllOSlffl'I.AN ll~Vl:iGl:PI.ANSMAY OC CU M ON ~11:. 12 AHV PRA D O PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ~ co MM u N, r, Es Temecula, CA A-45 Inc ;; ~ - © 2020 Kevin L Crook. Archttecl, Inc. Refer to kmdsccpe drawings !OJ woH, tree. and sh/vb tcccncos FRONT ~; ~i I g ~raY. ,L.QL MATERIALS LEGEND !Wltill.OCC Ufe.J FRONT DOOR: F!8ERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAl SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGlES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORaEL/ ir:NEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2116 WOOD GABLE END: BOARD AND BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW BOX: SIMULATED WOOD SHUTT ERS : SIMULA TfD WOO D POT SHELF SIMULA TED WOO D TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGO FOAM WAINSCOT: SlONE VENEER PORCH: WOOD POST AND 6EAM RIGHT [J □ □ D D □ 0 ~ REAR CLUSTER COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 4 "C" CRAFTSMAN - ELEVATIONS LEFT r,,Q IE.k£1HI IOSl1fl'I.AN · >fVIJIZI.PIANSIMY OCCIJkONSUC. 12 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ co MM u N 1T1 ES Temecula, CA A-46 Inc -~:i;;: .• I + Q MATERIALS LEGEND jWllllnOCCUi<'>] FRONl DOOR: FIBERGLASS GARAGE DOOR: METAl SECTIONAL ROOF: COMPOSITION SHINGLES ROOF EXTENSIONS: WOOD CORBEL/ KNEE BRACE FASCIA: 2x6 WOOD BARGE: 2il6 WOOD GABLE ENO: BOARD ANO BATTEN WALL: STUCCO/ LAP SIDING WINDOWS: VINYL W/ GRIDS WINDOW eox- SIMUlATED WOOD SHUTTERS: SIMULATED WOOD POT SHELF SIMULA JED WOOD TRIM: STUCCO OVER RIGID FOAM WAINSCOT; STONE VENEER PORCH WOOD POST AND BEAM REAR COLOR SCHEME 7 PLAN 4 "C" CRA FTSMAN - ENHANCED EL EVATIO N NOtf:l(ttUIO!,!lll'I.AN in:Vllr.",!'l'\.ANS~Y OC CU ~ON $!![ 12 AHV PRADO PA 2 1-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ COMMuN1T,es Temecula.CA A-47 Inc r- ---- : 11N. ! \J~ I I [ :-1 ------------1 I : I : Nt\ i :v C i 4:12 r i ~N .. I - I ~ I I ! I : -< -------------------, I I I I I I I I I I I : ~~ hlB " " " " :• "A" - SPA NISH "B" - CO TT A G E "C " - CRA FTSM A N ROOF PLANS PLA N 4 0 2 4 12 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ co MM u N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-48 Inc 7' 1 108 2 3 8 1 7 -4 SPANISH 'A' 1. 4:12 & 5:12 ROO F 2. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROO F 3.1'-0"EA VES 4. 0'-8" RAKES 5. CONCRET E "S" TILE 6. STUCCO 7. VINYL WINDOWS B. RECESSED GABLE DETAIL 9. STUCCO TRIM 10. DEC ORATIVE POTSHELF l 1. CLA Y PIPES 12. WOO D SHUTTERS 13. SECTIONAL METAL ROLL-UP DOO R COTTAGE 'B' 1. 6:12ROOF 2. HIPPED ROO F 3. l '-0" EAVES 4. COMPOSITION SHINGLE 5. STUCCO 6. WOO D SHUTT ERS 7. VINYL WINDOWS 8. BRICK ACCENT 9. STUCCO TRIM 10. SECTIONAL METAL ROLL-UP DOO R CRAFTSMAN 'C' 1. 4:12 & 5:12 ROO F 2. FRONT TO BACK MAIN GABLE ROO F 3. l'-6" EAVES 4. l '-0" RAKES 5. COMPOS ITION SHINGLE 6. CEM ENTITIOUS LA P SIDING 7. BOARD AND BA TIE N GABLE END 8. VINYL WINDOWS 9. STONE ACCENT 10. WOO D TRIM 11. KNEE BRACE 12. SECTIONAL METAL ROLL-UP DOO R IA-SPANISH ~~9 2A-SPANISH 6 108 21 3 129 2XA- SPANISH 3A-SPANISH 4A-SPANISH 7 5, 9 5 1B-COTTAGE 45101 762 2B-COTTAGE 16 7 2 4 9 2XB - COTTAGE 3B-COTTAGE 2 ' a s J 1 7 10 5 <I 2 6 9 8 ' 5 10 9 1112 7 JC-CRAFTSMAN 2C - CRAFTSMAN 2XC - CRAFTSMAN 3C - CRAFTSMAN 4B-COTTAGE STYLE GUIDE 4C - CRAFTSMAN AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ ? c o MM u NI r Es Temecula, CA A-49 Inc ;;: PRADO TEMECULA, CA "A" ELEVATIONS SPANISH SCHEME 1 SCHEME2 SCHEME 3 INTEGRAL COLORED 1572 1613 1531 STUCCO STU C C O PAI N T M A TC H ... RGB :!S512 551255 Sl¥60/"8R£Al1ST8EIC.£ SW7l;97 PALE n~uuw FASCIA/ TRIM/ SW7040 SW 6104 SW9115 GARA G E DOO R SMOKEHOUSE KAFFEE COW BOY BOO TS FRONT DOOR/ SW 00 32 SW7 580 SW2 816 SHUTT ERS NE ED LEPO IN T NA VY CARNELIAN RKW D DARK GREEN SW 6061 SW6061 SW 6061 GABLE END DETAIL TANBARK TANBARK TANBARK RO O F: LOW PRO FILE 1VlCS64 64 1VICS3182 1VICS04 31 "S" VILLA CA MISSION BLEND GARNET BLEND APPLE BARK DECO RA TIVE Tl LE: FD-193B F0-106A F0-148 MALIBU "B " ELEVATIONS COTTAGE SCHEME4 SCHEMES SCHEMES INTEGRAL COLORED 1544 STUCCO 1533 1539 ST U C C O PAI N T M A TC H " .. Sn'aU.Jl feMf-'[;"RATE TAI.IP!:" S~i1POPULARGRAY .'iW164tJFIR$T sr.1,R FASCIA/ TRIM SW7 100 SW 6070 SW7069 A RC A D E Vi/H IT E HE RO N PLU M E IRON ORE GARA G E DOO R SW 6075 SW7040 SW7069 G A R R ET G RA Y SMOKEHOUSE IRON ORE FRONT DOOR/ SW0032 SW2846 SW7593 SHUTT ERS NEEDLEPOINT NAVY BRONZE GREEN RUSTIC RED COMPOSITION I LANDMARK LANDMARK LANDMARK SHINGLES BURNT SIENA HEATHER BLEND MOIRE BLACK BRICK: TUNDRA TUNDRA TUNDRA CHALK DUST LATIGO IRONSIDE GRO UT: MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE MAC MISTY COVE "C " ELEVATIONS CRAFTSMAN SCHEME 7 SCHEMES SCHEME 9 INTEG RAL COLO RED 1588 1620 STUCCO 1627 STUCCO PAINT MATCH··· SW7639 ETHERAL MOOO SW6107 NOMADIC DESERT $W7l'JS !UNY fAUPF FASCIA I TRIM I SW7564 SW7 003 SW7 634 POLA R BEA R TOQUE W HIT E PEDIMENT BOARD & BATTEN I I SW7 737 SW7039 SW2836 SID ING AT GABLES MEA DOW TRA IL VIRTUAL TAUPE QUARTERSAW N OAK GARAGE DR/ SW2843 SW7 04 0 LA P SIDING I SW2 837 CO RNER BOARDS ROYCROFT BRA SS SMOKEHOUSE AURORA BROW N FRONT DO OR SW 0044 SW 9140 SW 6258 HUBBARD SQUASH BLUSTERY SKY TRICORN BLA CK COMPOSITION LA NDMARK i LANDMARK LANDMARK SHINGLES WEATHERED WOOD HEATHER BUENO BURNT SIENA STO NE:COUNT RY LEDG E SKYLINE W OLF CREEK RED ROCK ORYSTACK INSTALL ALL FLASHING. GUTTERS. DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. ··• For ph otoshop renderi ngs only. do NOT use in the field PROJECT #19132 CREATED 2/17 /2021 Client Revis ions 3/17/2021 Client Revis ions 3/23/2021 Client Revis ions 419/2021 Planning Dept. 10/14/2 021 Revisions Chent Revisions _ 10/21@6. City Revisions 1/20/2022 Client Revisions 1/26/2022 STUCCO: OMEGA PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ROOF: BORAL STONE: ELDORAD O/ CULTURED STONE GROUT: ORCO or EQUAL DECORATIVE ROCKMILL TILE: COMPOSITI ON I CERTAINTEED SHINGLES AHV COMMUNITIES Kevin L. Cro ok I Architect Inc WRITTEN COLOR SCHEMES AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ co MM u NI r, Es Temecula. CA A-50 Inc ; "A " SPA N ISH "B" CO TT AG E "C" CRAFTSMAN [D f] GENERATION LIGHTING Brentwood Small One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern (BLACK)* ITEM: 89822-12 MASONITE Belleville 2 Panel Plank Cheyenne * GENERATION LIGHTING Shepherd Medium Lantern (BLACK)* ITEM: OL10601DWZ GENERATION LIGHTING Hunnington One Light Outdoor Wall Lantern (BLACK)* ITEM: 89029-12 '~i n MASONITE Belleville 6 Panel * MASONITE Belleville 2 Panel Square * C ARRIAG E LIG HTS AND EXTERIO R DO O RS * OR SIMILAR MANUFACTURER AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ E C O M M u N 1T 1E s Temecula.CA A-5] Inc ;; "A " SPA N ISH "B" COTTAGE "C" CRAFTSMAN mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm [!]])] mm [[I]]]] mm mm [[I]]]] mm mm □□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□ □□□□□□□□ II I ii 1111 11 11 II I ii 1111 11 11 II 1111 Ii II Ii 1111 Ii II CLOPAY Gallery Steel _ Short Panel * CLOPAY Classic Steel Value_ Traditional Short* CLOPAY Classic Steel Value_ Traditional Long * GARAGE DOORS * O R SIM ILAR MANUFACTU RER AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviAic~it~~~ E co MM u N, T, Es Temecula, CA A-52 Inc ;;; 1 2 6 '-6 " 1 6 '-1 1 " 1 2'-0'' 30 '-0'' 20'·7' 2]'-ff ~ ~ i l ' ' i : ' : ~:::::::::::::::::::::::: ~ ~ ~--1- J ~ ""' - : : '-----1 ~ '"CHEN ~ : ir"n 0, ""'"'" . R'91il , ,! v~ ~ , O o mNm CEN"" IO'I,- FL~f.S.~N" m· IO'I,- £;;;:~~ ~ □ ~~ l .•... 0 ~ ~ -- : ~, LJ LJ ~ CAA,SPAC'1 ! t,,ce lJ_s-=-, ~ filOJ'/!'.!'!'!.'I[O~ i iJ ~ ,_ CONFREN CER M./ ii _ I 09.-~~.~~ A CL~::G~:•:J!M ---~,-ii:.a..11,,;~~..,;-.J b::::!l , _ __ : 1,1 ITT ··-- 1 -~ O ~ I I ~ ---~~~-_;--- ~ :=.~ ' ' PORCH I k I' 11 .. , ~ " c__J ~ ~ a ~,9/RC~ ~)Iii a COVE RED PATIO 1 H i ---- COVE REDPATI02 ____ ,>-o"""'«t>Ooo ! ~ ~I~ ~ l6"-11" 12'-0'' 35'-6" 19'-3" ~ ~ ~ 26'-10" 126'-6" OCCUPANCY I iOOM CiOUP PLUMBING FIXTURES REQUIRED AREA RAT10 OCCUP,\NJS WAm CLOSETS LAVAIORE UiN.t.lS LEASING OFFICE IOIAL ~ IOIAL MALE FEMALE MAt.E FEMALE MALE fEMAI..E MALE AREA TABULATION ~~Ina mo::~IN./ '10~1- 11 0~• • 1 1 '0'.~· 1 •~~- I ''·=· 11 11'J~ · I 110~- l1~ I 'Q~ I 'Q~- ,::::.~,~I ~ ~ l'IXll.r.t,W./ ~- -- 11'1?·1•1·:-11~l11:1J11· l/0~2• 1 \/cl!.• 'l~- TOTALREQUl:EO SW IMMING POOL · PLUMBING FIXTURE REQU IREM ENTS ,c.a.c ,...., 5~~~ElroTAL ~- WATS.RCLOSETS ~Lsf ~:'.~~ JSHOWERS AREA 150· FT. l=t~~':_.;% MALE ,EMLE IIIALET 1/80 i E±~ 1~ - ~ f ·~ Et[~:"~_1 ~ 1_, 1 ? 1 j l I i PLUMBING FIXTURES PROVIDED l WATU CLOSffi I lAVATORES l URWJ.S MEN'SRESliOOM FLO O R PLA N 1•0"'""""00M I I OFFICE/ RECREATIONAL CENTER 'CROSS AREA IUNCONOITIONEO SPACE IUNCONDIIIONEO SPACE i-····· -· . J75 so. n. !IIRt'.EZr ..,.T J75 so. n. ' , .._ .... _TIC_IUIICUor1..-,on..-~• .. .u.11c, __ '0-...u.1 ,.,,, .. ,,__. ....... -~ ...... DITt.a ..... .,"" _ sfi~5~1lt~~~~,;"""~~~ CLUBHOUSE AREA TABULATION 'C l!O SS A l!EA TOTAL DW[UINC 2,759 SO, n, IO!Al DWELllNC. ~ UNCONOITION!'O SPACE UNCONDITIONEO SPACE CARISPolC[/IIWIITNO.CE l'OOl 510IU,l'OOl teuf', ~~~i~~ Clilll S,,,,,CC/-1AH(NC( POCI.S/00.PODI.ECIJIP, lli 5i ~i ifini:~~ 1211 so. n t~ 5: R: LEASING -·~·---- ....... ,_,.._ ...... _,_ ......... -.u.~- 1,::;;;-~ :i:~.::.~~~-:.:.:.:.~::.:.:=::'-" I-·-----·~- .. --••M•.-- .. ···~ -•-=-"", ...... ,...,..,.nc...,,.,..,,._.""_,,._ __ or"" """'"'n.OOII .-. n,..,..,,_ _ _,_ .. 1-~ ... ,..0l'l-••m- 0 2 4 1 2 AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ co M M u N , T , E s Temecula. CA A-53 Inc • ©2021 Kevin LCrookArchltect. Inc . FRONT Refer to landsc ape drawings for wall, nee, and stirvb loc ations REAR COLOR SCHEME 8 ELEVATIONS LEASING OFFICE/ RECREATIONAL CENTER 0 2 4 I 2 AHV PRADO PA2l-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMM J "''r, Es Temecula. CA A-54 Inc ;;; -~ ------ RIGHT LEFT EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME ELEVATIONS LEASING OFFICE/ RECREATIONAL CENTER 0 2 4 l 2 AHV PRADO Kevinl.Crook "' P A2 l -0838 02/l 4/22 Architect ~ c o :-..1 M u N 1T 1E s Temecula, CA A-55 Inc ;; ..:::::,. 4:12 4:12 :a:, ;;a 0 mO n::;; ;:;o;j;: mZ )> -i 0 z )> r n m z -i m ;;a r------- ' ' ' ' ' I 1, l_ _ 4:12 'v" ------- - -----------~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ! t ' ' ' ' ! ' t ' ! ___________________ t 4:12 'v" ..:::::,. 4:12 4:12 'v" 4:12 'v" P RA D O R E C R E A T IO N B U IL D IN G TEMECULA , CA #19132 3/17/2021 10/14/2021 EXTERIOR COLOR SCHEME INTEGRA L COLORED STUCCO 1572 STUCCO PAINT MATCH ... SW1151 HI REFLECTIVE WT SW7040 FASCIA/ TRIM SMOKEHOUSE SW7102 GARA GE DOOR FRAME - WHITE FLOUR SW0032 DOORS I SHUTT ERS I I NEEDLEPOINT NAVY SW7 017 ELEVATION DETAILS - DORIAN GRAY SW6061 GABLE END DETAILS TAN BARK SW6990 WROUGHT IRON CAVIAR 1VICS6464 ROOF: LOW PROFILE "S" VILLA CA MISSION BLEND VINYL WINDO WS ALMOND KEYSTONES D617 TILE AT SHOWERS ARCTIC WHITE DECORATIVE TILE FD-193B PROJECT CREA TED Planning Rev STUCCO: OMEGA PAINT: SHERWIN WILLIAMS ROOF: BORA L TILE AT DAL TILE SHOWERS: DECORATIVE ROCKMILL TILE: A H V COMMUNITIES Kevin L. Crook I A rch ite ct Inc All FLASHING, GUTTERS, DOWNSPOUTS ETC. TO BE PAINTED TO MATCH ADJACENT SURFACE. All PAINT BREAKS TO BE CUT AT INSIDE CORNERS. •• FOR PHOTOSHOP & RENDERING PURPOSES ONLY, DO NOT USE IN THE FIELD TODAS LAS TAPAJUNTAS, CAfiALERAS, CAiiALONES, ETC.SE RAN PINT ADOS PARA IGUALAR A LA SUPERFICIE DE JUN TO TODAS LAS RESTAURAS DE PINTURA SE CORTARAN EN LAS ESQUINAS INTERIORES -soio PARA FINES DE PHOTOSHOP y REPRESENTAClONES, NO USAR EN EL CAMPO WRITTEN COLOR SCHEME AHV PRADO PA21-0838 02/14/22 KeviA~c~it~~~ ~ COMMUNIT•ES Temecula.CA A-57 Inc :; -- -- FUTURE SENIOR COMMUNITY L - - . I 'I I i.J ·- G- - ----- 1 ~ ... . ii, ti ~-- ;i:, __ ... r ~ i..= -w- OliJ ➔- .. - -.:., .,,,. ' '" ., ... --,,. · -• • I ,- 7 ' I -Cl--- . - # -,, ' - I . - . f l .... ' •• -:-f'l-ba, J C; I .... ~ ~ ' r ·,-.-- 1 ......, .... 1 t.• tf--.. ·' 1 .~-;g{,i;'-:,ff+.+·~.' · . .-· ,., Ci I' . I ···. - -•,c:r;;H • • • -.. 6 ~-- ;;,·,, . ' ' I ' A I . I ' ' .. .,. J ., . lir'J - .., - \ --... ., " ---t ... - . ' " \ i :,_,: ;1 11'!'.II ~1 " " '. . I I . . - ' ··,1~ ~ . ' . .. I I . ""' I -~- . - - . . ....... ! "*. ·, ' . ' . ~ ~- ·-. ' ' • . ' .. ~-, _..,_Q ll . . ~. =' - . - .. -~ o I ' 'I ·•·i d,,._, l~' ~ ~-- - . .. .. I_ . - -- . .,.,__ - . .· . --. ~-- - -- - --~ -o-_ ·c.l -frc I .. • .i • . J,·('11/''tH+{ ~. ,. C ~- \ __ ·. k· ·cc. _ -: __ - -~ -<_: < - /:"::=t. ~,;, :·_-' w o I~ =. 91q .-;. - -~ - 1 ,· 4 n ' '-- •• • QO I -•~ l • .. . "' •. ' • • ,_ I • • ' I 1, ' 1. I 1 . .. ~ ., - • C,--u;.·) ti I ' I ,; L' ' ~ <> .I • ' Ii I I , " ,, •.I I 1• ; · ' I • "i ~ L~" ~- ~. ,:. ....,, ...0 ..,...,;:t -,, .. ,I I I ' ..,..,.J "'f'&_' ' 1N11 .:itti+f . C ~ ~ • ... 1 ... -- 1: .. ---•l-f· I :1 ~~-;') .~ l ". d~l ~ ·, I , I I • · I I, ! ,, · • \~ , ' ~.-pi,-z~, '=--J F-r--,- j I ' T •• ... I .I . • ; I // I 1. ! ' . ,, ~ . " I I ' ~ , __ . ~ -~-4,I t» c, . ...,_ .. ~ ; '-" t, _.,._l:,i --I;,- .. _, • •. · I ~--fit~•-• ' .. ',.' i~:1.·. f±i-1-r ·~· c ., c• , r:iH+R.. . r i- , __ .... , . -r.. _ .. ··. ·. ,'.j,__ . ._ __ .,';• .. ~- r.,. . "- . ... --i '• ,.,l -; , ' j • ~ '0 • , )i. J; ··_ ,I II · . , 1, ---~- .. , ,+ l . . . . • "- ' . . " ., 11'? 'f ': !i;1 "•'"'[ .· I II I , • .,,., -s:: . "· ., -._-........ ·-.·. - .. •·r_· '.·rJ. '1 ' i(;,~ J..; ~I .. - ~. .. ,.,. - .. •. ' ·. ,, ' I " .. - · -t>... I, · . ·, .,_.., - _ ,!, '( •~~ •·,, ··B •. · . . . • ·_·, · · ..- · ,_ ; i1_ .. •~- •.. \.'',~9 ~ ~ ·1~"Jt-~~~1·m,, i: ··"-1111 .. ~ .. ~.:_:.ti , . , ,,. ~- -..1. . ·- ··•· . ' ~ r .. '~ • . . . .. . • . ''-•~ • ·« :,.... ·'.c• , - . ---.. ' . :.,l- . .t ~ . " ~ y ,, - . . . . ,,, ' . . . . ' . . ' : -1....,, '-,,,/' . '·","?:"i''- ~ ,.' ..... : . ✓ ''> . L-_ '.' • , '' .J_.·· ... .J -~, I 1, : .5.._ ' ti, ~ .. ~ -. U :,__, \ • /2' ~_._ ~- f ~ • \ t. ~-'I =f .~ c •? - 1 ), l . ,, 0 . ' fl... .. . 'LO t· , - ~ ' 1 .. , • ~ .._ • • j; " • '\ :· . " ,· • \ ., I ·• - . , .. ' ., ,. • . -. , -~ ,., . I . • . - ' I . . • / ·.. '-· .... ·"" / ' .... :\ \' . - - 'A._-_,;.(' __ \ ... ·-~" '\. ~ •- .. -.-:\ __ \. Jit. _,, _/ CRP/AHV PRADO OWNER. LLC CONIACI: Sf>t:Net:.Q IINl:1:'11 150PAULAi!lNOAVENUE SUITED250 COS TA MESA.. CA ,2626 1'"9)8 92-9110 ri"wcril~oom A l'f'UCANT : I\HV COMMU l'l!ES CONTACT: KcV\N~fA 150 PAUI.AR INO AVEN UE nne casc COSTA MES A. CA '2626 ::;~,~~~fe~ ''°""" !:EVIN L. CROO( ARCHITECT. INC. CONTACT: KEVIN CROQI( \340 Reyno ldsA .... s1.11tollO IRVIN E,CA92 6U 1'•9)660-15&7 kcrook ~01e n.com ,,.,....,.... SB&OINC. CONTACT: DANI EL O'ROU R~E. ~111!/1 !:N IE.~ras.E CRC U:NOi'i\-1 ,.126 li:Mr.C'U.A.CA.9'2)90 951~ oor,,:,ii mQ"rt::;.cgm I.AN DSCA P'E AICIITECI , DA I/O Nl::A U..TASSOCL0.11:S CON l..,Cl:BII YAN\.OVI: 411S77ENIERf'RISF CRO fNORll l#l.() IEMECUlACA.9?S90 ,.,_,,...,, -- NOTES : ll Pl'l>M.'<tt<1A.tlCMA10Cf&CAl()NS'rS1lMSl,<A\loit""'4i"llt00t<Aut-"="f'(0,..;,;_AS11to.tlilf'GHlCAIIOt< 10H WAll~U$t $17,llMS SHAU !It IMPUMINHO fll!IIG,A.10,.SVSltMS""II Ill Dl$CM'Ol0?"111l'fl Ow'fll$1''1,0,YQ><l0 WAl<WA~ PA...,"-CA'I\AS.lt,,'>l!)~ASOF['-C($ "11 l~(HMU fir M:rs:MUMOOIJllll STMIO W[,..ti!A=$l0W C<!OW""-C Tf<llH""1l lli.Sltll•SrA<!O. $IOI'!" ~"'4hvt FHT ()l!CR!;ArtllN vo,:rcAJ. ,<(,c,;1 W<IHStOPU Cll!Al[i! lkA><OW ICIUAI 103 I 10tll lA..u;CA••rn Al AMIN""'.IMW~•<ANA~TfC,lj()lj..OCO'Vf.A.00,( l~CAUCINCl'llAIG(i!SJ/l l"l!"[~/aJ S0:.:-fH10fS,OP( AAfAA:•OCNcl•c.AllO<Olll, .. >IGHS,l'lllll•Cl'llACMtCDSQJ-JlllOISlOl'fAll!A S,.OP(IIANU"'-DCUSOl!,C,..01 lltr NVU!l"CAL -,f ,C.,,, w~ .. S,QP[SC'll!,l!WOIIIQUAJ. 10;>) S><4lLAUOIII PIIOWl'OWll"o,,,t x;AllONOltt.AAGii!IIIH Pli!l.aDSOUAIIIIUIOISIOPf_A ... ADDhONIOJ"ll«Nl 111·0.:lil!.w .. ,s AH I.Al'<CGCAl'I A'ltASS><AJ.ll!!:ON(3·a:01 .. -00!"0!IA!0<Ml/lC>< Al.tU!UU S!<All!ltl.C 0[>.fOWlT,.~ltl'I.AM ...... !l~AJ. All ?AO!>:WAVS. lA.'U.CAPI.-.C..!!~0-'IC ANO O"<.Sl'l lO<IING §HA \\ !If MA<'<TAL'<!0!Y1,,t "IOl't.WT•OW'-t~ All lW>IGAl!OA>liAS 10 , ... Ve MO:!lU'I!: !.f'<ID'IS l..:ilAllfOtO [>l!Ul!I -,A~1 MAl!~AL SUIIV-VAl ACOMJl,/,.._10.'<0f UIHS.$,.:t,!1$.A,OCilO,J,OCOVl;WS,.,.ll!J! NCQlll'OAAlfOINOlA,U.CAP...c;l'I......_.. • IQ!lS "'-1."0<ao,c(l~c.AllOO<W'E ACa"1AIIU 10"'S,OP1$l ,So<IMSS~c.AIIOl<,....::I • S,,111/Si l,C,.•aO0<(P\AN1lOO(-U!OAC-o(Y(l00"l/lCl"'COVfl!AC( ... Ol',l"lA'fl ~ ~~!~::=l~:l~:~~~~n~,~~~~,t~s:"'~~NIAl~!A~i= Ill 1'1l Al'i'(C,.,_t ,-SUfll.$ l"AI MAIUfll. l'lANIINC,$ W-ll NOi INll'lf(fll. Wit>< UIUIIES, AOJAC!,_I S,11.(X::Stll>G S!OUC!~""UANOl'CAffC$1C>i!llt,($ t,i l~::Sl'r.N<ll""CONf()IIMM;QWl~1><l 01YOf IU,•fCIAAClY(lQP >,llNll;OC{ ASOCU,C.-<CUllfl .... SA'<O S><AJ.t Ill \1Sl0NCO..:UOCIO-'lw, .. , .... o:•o l"(>,l{CUIA$0l•wa. OlS.cNCUOl1"'6t01!1A!,OICAP • ..c >JI lfll.($ AO,,O-,Sl,AA.i1 !f "'-AClOAMi.-.SMO ~ AWAYIIIOMWAl(Qo,ofl(II. GASMfllll. Ol!Sl\Oll~l.ATIAALl. .._.....,...., .. OI IOAWAYF'OMPOW(IIPO.!.S.A.'-OA ..... MJMOfe AWAY!W()Mfll! ,n•OIIA.'<l~MOl'II (llPA;ifMfM-fllA/10 $1ANO"Of'!.CO<"-IC!~ l•I AU SH<loeAr,[IISANl)SlOl'!.lfllll(".Al()><S, ... Ll ltf!)[,iP.IYP! IRfl>CATl()NASMlASU'IIO!NCALiO,,.S~[~..o.Jij I~ AH P\, .. .',11lf<SAOJ ACl~T 10PARll0.CS!Ar.LS$>...,_l lifCfM A ITCO,,C<O:lfStfPOJl. JC'< Atl)I IC)N :o lo<!' 6•w1(1 OJ.it!) D A TA TA B L E ASS ESS ORS PARCEL NUMBER:9 l'-40().0 51-6, 916--1 00-052-1. 916~~3,e ANO 916-400--0 66. Sll!E.€J AOORE.SS:N/A I.EGA!. OE.SCRlnlON: PARCEL I z PARCElS 15 THROUGH 17. INCLUSIVE. AS SHOWN ON THE MA P E.NI ITlEO"PARCE.L MA P NO. J"3 l6 ". flLE.OAUGUST 20 . 20 \S. IN BOOll 239 OF PAR CEL MAP S. Al PAGES JJ THRO UGH 39. INCLUSM. RIVUSIOE COU NT Y REC OROS . PARCEL I• PARCE.L C AS SHOW N ON LOI LIN E A.CJUSTMENI NO. PA 17.ol'M. AS EVE ENCED BY DOCUME NT RECORDED AUG UST 10. 2017 AS NS TRUME NI NO. 2017-0l2as& OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXIS TING I.AN D USE: VACANT PRO POSED \.AND USE: RESIDENTIAL f)(ISJING !O NING OE.SIGNATION: SPE.CIFIC PLAN ISP) PRO POSED ZONING DESIGNATION: SPECIRC PLA N ISP) EX ISTING GE NERAL PLA N DESIGNATION : PLAN IMP lE.ME N!AIION ISPI) TOTAL GROS S AR EA : 27.Sl l AC. SEE SHEET 2 FOR PLANT LEGEND ~ N.T.S. M A TC H LI N E - SE E SH E ET 2 SHEET l OF 6 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN LA N D S C A P E C O N C E P T PLA N FO R : PRADO L-1 PA21-0838 AHV Communities ~~- TE M E C U L A , C A LI F O R N IA -0 z Rll:P LL < 0 _J 6: !!!l!!l1!1l!!!!!!!!l!l!!!l!!!!I N 0.. g6 ii 11nn !!Hi! i!Hii!§HIH mmm m1 !! I- LJ.J ($ I <( ,- IJ.J 0.. ~ z u u IJ.J < ~ ~ I 0 O! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g~~~~~g~g ~~~g ~~ V) u z 2 H V) 0 ~ ~ z al Hail HUH 66~6666665666666b86666565666666 ~~gg g ~!!~ "'9 < u ~g3333gg~3g53~~3~333333353333gg 5~5533353 ~ ~ _J :5' . ' ~ ~ it ii( ~ )t id:~~~ _J _J :::, 8 < u I J i °' w ! I. 5 , I : ii,; . ~· LJ.J ~ ~ i ; ' ' ! L H ! > ~ i' i ~ '; n ' . ~ ' ~ ! ~ I ' ' ' w € I i·- J11g ~1~! 0 I- !tip h .i' n ~ g ~Id§ pi ,~!- ~'ii ~ •p,;- Ii 'i ! ~ Uh~i ~~a~ a d~H mi oh ' ·i~ ; i ij • ~ 5!•· ~· ! L ', b in_i ~ 5 hL ~~§!~ rn,s ,. ! !1i!h~il i, H • ~ § ' I· . ~ ii • J 0 ~ l, } ii ! i ~ u ~ i. ~ ~! ii,!i!~i~ '. 1· I - i q ~ d d , ~ ~ is idd i , !jg q ! ' i 1!l~U !o 15 i g u I § ,~ ~ ' i Hg ~~II, '' I ~ ; ~ _J co p ildJ iiJ '' •1 Z!iiJr~f 6 • !, l 5 I ~ a' il I ' 9 n nj r!P• Hid m I •a••gB·!-' i ~ . ~ ~ " 1h i~ l ,~ • ' § !~H_.~a i~ ;; i u - d t i ~ ~I s . ~ ~ < ■ ~ • . 0.. ■ ■ ■ II II I I - , . .../.- - -·"" ·r,/. -- ... -Jr. . -.- , •. ·CWS'T(~ll<>f31-. _-4 ·..... I "'",&I.' :'1;.'::' . ------------- " ---·, ... ·.• .. ·· . ·. ' . ,,. ~•- • _,. ,· ,,o~fCTlOG C", · . · '• I ..._. 7..•. I. ... ,/ . ''"" .. '""'". ··. . - ~" .. • • ·. ~ ~ -"'"."""' - -w -~-~ -~·, ;~.,t_, .~- .. •.•. ,~-.·.·.·· -.. !{~!~.-~ ·w· .... ·. ·f i'._~ .•• ~L ~.-.-.--- c .. ""'~ ... :JCt!:J.·;.·. ··. c_-.:J:Jr- ·.. , ...... _J ..... ~ .. I.'· . 1· ·_· . ~ ':. -- . ~,,,. . . L__., -- .• -, ,,, : -- - · · ~ r I · I ~~ e :- - :· ··_..,..·_·_. - . -. -___,,,. ~· --- .. "' ... ~;".· .- .. - ... __ - r:~-~~:-J .. c .~·.t.1-,· ... ..;,J. .-_- .~:J~':. .1• __ . ., c~ , ,.r 111"'11 -· • .. . --- -:, .,,. ..... ,; -~ - - :. ; ... -:_,, ,. ,..5 -,~ I :, ~ .:,- _,,.. , ~ ' / ·$ ' 4 _) -., ' ~.~ ~., . ! ' . . .--- . ~- - ~· 'E," -- - ,, It ~- C-' . .) .. ~~ '.""'"'"'0 '· \. •. -. I~- •.. · · · r 1- •· r.~.-.· . -:· .. ·.·•'' ~. \ ' •:--···~¥-,-~~- . ~ _}~,--, 1··-. .,_ ' . ~ .,, . . ,, L.· ·L.. . . . J< . . -·. . . . ·. . ~.' ,'.'. .· ~- .... ·•. .t .. '•. ~. t _,_ .. o'.~",;,~ . =.,e• ' -· .... •• •.;: - ' . "' . ,..... ., < . . • """'"' • .... ,, .. ~- ~ • ,,.: . ··--~-- • ' i . . . . .. .. . ' . . .. . . "'""""' ·"" -11 I.; • ., , ' / l \ .. . . ' . . . " . "' ", / ' 4 -,, ~ .__ ' - '- \ . : t',: . . ·' -• \ ' ~ ... ':t. 1tf/l: . -- . . .. __......,~~H..---~ ,, . .· ', " v -~~- r , - . - . , rr ~ - , 'f "F' , .. . ·~ - ~'.- ◄ ··• . . . . -·•~ {,, - (··•:..-\,, \..}"~~·)···- . --. " ,-r-r- ~-. l: ,.· .. 1r ,._j . ~ Jr,,,,:~ 1 , • .~ - .------ ,-------- - -•<B> ·~ ' ' "'· ~- )' _~..,,,✓ -..-, ~:.· -- I . : ~~: . Ii,; \ !to., ,., · · '• . 4P' ·~ I •. I '~ ""''"'' .. "'I /·-., ' . i~ · ,. •~ '. · ~ - ~- · ,.. '"-,,uo, " "" •• •, ·. ., Jf, ./ , •-' .;,•-ace. · .· . .. : "'-"""•'~• _ ( ', - .. ,z . ~'!' .. t ·, '· ·. .;,1_ ... _.,...,,,,;._·_.,. ! L O ~-.«J:J _ ft\ ,, I ,.·'(, .•··· If. ;,;,·~ i" J' . .,.,, - . . $' - ,.._ -~,'-~. . • -~:_;_·. ~~ .. 1· 'W .... . J. - . - . -W1 I 'x . ,, i,,t, %'------~. 1', ... _ .·. • . . . ~ ,._, ,.- .,;: ' .·,_ ., ti . /I•:·•. . . . . . . 1 , ' '"''''"-'• '. . ... , , -- - ~ ...... ) . . .. . . ' .• . .,,. ~~:,--:. . '- 1C ,: . .. . ·: ... _· .. , .. J(' . ,:, . _-~II':.~-,, -· , r ., .•· c I c I -e- c· --e - c, ;_, · - ··-·. 't._ .. ~~----~,. -~~~ --.: . _t,,,, -D l.J~L _. .. :!'! ' ' ~~" .. 'T, ~ ' . ' ' . :., .... ~ -~-~---. :':;" J ·- ~, • < / J, , 'j ,'J,;'), -;,:,;i;5 II,- cc V'~oce,,-,e, I ~~ • · ~ .. ccscnooc 1t,,."- .- .... ~r .... -.~ ·~,.,.,.,·_·: .. ~~::f._· .. ;r·. _ ,,,. -=~~ d _Jt-. ~, , :. " ;:;::~~ _/ ~ . I - . . ~"·-~ . . ) .. _ .. ){ ·--~"'""'°•' WS"" ~ ... ~.. "!" -. C ·- ,l' . ,· ·-:-•. "• ,_ ~: ," • I il I ~- ,. ~:.: . .....,., ~--£..:--·.s~,,4--·.! .. '."'I ,_ I .· - . ... -- ,._.,: .. ~ ,,.. t,.., ..... ,._. . . \. \.\_. C ·c .. •'011 '·,, .:~""; J . ccveeec ·•• .. :",. "°'"" ,,.r . r. -- 1. . .r.J. . r . I "' .... . •,:a. I '_,:, ,_,,, . •'< • '""' : ii:"""' ,, ~ . :1~4': ,- .._. ,., -- r _,.. .- "J •;...·_ - - . •• ·•. """"'- CM•,C ~ ,. i.---r-t I 1', • : f~' . , ... _~\ .. ".,.,.... " ~r -~- -~- .. , .... , I ,w .. ~-" •. , '"•· ·_~· r'. ·- I ~,,.,;· . - .. • iC~.- - JJII . 1·; ..,,_ .. ._~-· .. ,,:::;'~;;""~ ·f ~':~· l' i . . .,, . ·-.---• .. . ,,..· .. j ~- iiiiiiiili -.- ~- ~_..,_.. • '· . ,..,,. ·,•· ..,. . -,.,.. " ,. . . .. ~' -.\?-W · .. ~·" '·.·· ,, \1 Lb'°''""""""'"'' ,;[l;.:1lt;,'.\.~t .·hr;;•,:,f~ .· I·.··.. I LJ L L ' I t _ f: - , .. ,· 15i,,-,,t:'-",;\_Zi3:,·-. sC:, g,A''" · . . ~ . cJ; . i .,., ~ - I - I .,;_ § jJ -J (!"'" n ,. . ;J ;.~· ' . - - ~ ---- -.:, T ~-- I I '-" ;, \ '- I . I ". -- - - _. , '-' ,- .... , ~ ' , 1,,,f ;' •· • '-.._, ,,.,,...,,.,w<," " / "-'AJ ffi''fOE S1'11 V,N • £. - '.;;;- : =:- ~- . -=-- ~ ''"'"'" '.>s.' /• ·.!, RECREATION AREA LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: r-HJ ~ L-3 NORTH AHV Communities PA21 0838 P RA D O SHEET 3 OF 6 RECREATION ENLARGEMENTS TEMECULA. CALIFORNIA I AS SOC i,o,JH Jnc , I I I 11l I :1i ,I It :Ji":" ·I' ~ ', LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: PRADO AHV Communities ovrr•tOOI' INHl:«tOOP P"'5EOLOOI' IOIJ\l &.mfEO 1.:,1,..ts •,!IJfHI '2.228fW ,17Mllb ..41MIU:S SECONDARY ENTRY 1.ff3fffT ·'""" @ NORTH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY PLAN - 1"=60' n-r7@ L-4 NORTH Scale: 1"•20' PA2l-0838 SHEET 4 OF 6 PROJECT ENTRY ENLARGEMENTS & PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY PLAN TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA I °""'idt'IE,\J.l l ASSOCIA TESrlC . •• , >~6- 01.21.22 WALL AND FENCE LEGEND ~ OES CRPIION 1'-6" 111CH TUIE Sft£t Hl'ICE AND CATES - Bl.ACK l'ERIMET£ll WALL- Mll'I IMUM6' OR Pfll SOUND ATTENUAIIOl'I SINCLf.SIOl::D SPlff·FACE ILOCK (SPtll-FACE 01'1 PUIUC Vf.W SIOEJ COLOR"TAN' 6' l-1~H BLOCK WALL ·SING LE-SIDED SPL~·fACE 8LOCK (S"Lll·FACE ON PUB UC VEW SIDE)· COLOR "TAl'l" ENTRY MO NU'-"l:NTS - PER 1-!Al!VESIOJ'I GUIDELINES· ~!l'l~~R TO EXISTING 1-!ARVESTON l'IW lER ENTRY * 1'•6"1-!IGl-!VINYLCATE ~ ® ENTRY MONUMENTS SIMILAR TO HARVESTON ~1#1. .. ,0-kQQ.-'t>•- ~-'°' ............ (!1-....a,ltk,oa,.,::,o,;...,.. (I) n.--- 0~,:gr~""lf ..... ., __ I ~i "'1 i "', J.~ ® 5'-6" TUBULAR STEEL FENCE N.T.S. ! w i --- --- i ~ I :I PROJECTBOO NOAA Y I D < ~ w ;!: SHEET 5 OF 6 WALL AND FENCE PLAN LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: PRADO L-5 PA21-0838 NOTE: PILASTERS SHALL SE A MINIMUM 24" SQUARE 8LOCK PILASTER AND PROVIDED AT AMINIMUMSPACINGOFEVERY 50 FEET ALONC ALL SlREET FRONTAGES AHV Communities ~ @ • Scale:1"=40° NOllTH ~~ TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MATCH LINE - SEE SHEET 4 W A LL A N D FEN C E LEGEND SYMIIOL OESCRtPTION DETAIL PERIME1 El! WA.LL• '-'NI MUM ,. OR PER SOIJl,,O ATTENUAllON ~~~~ SPUT-FACE 8LOCI: f$1'UT-fACE ON PUii.iC VIEW SID€} 6' HlG H &LOC ( WALL· SINQ.E-S OEO SPUt -FACE 81.0 CI: iSPUT ..fACE ON PUBLIC VIEW SOE)· COI.OR 1AN" ENTRY MONUMENTS· PER HARYESTON GUIDELINES - TOBESIMlARlO EXISTINGHARVESTONPllASlER ENTRY """""'"'' 5'-6"HGHVNYL FENCE * 5'-t," f-lGH VNYL CATE ~ MAILSOXCLUS'IER (!) s,\l!FJtCfN.00:COI.IJMN /Wr0'£0CCVRS: {!) ~M.OCXW"11C,._P @ 'il!:Ck»ON6l0C~"'Wll:lt':.~P @ "'®:l6!if".JlF4CEllOCK(ONESICCDI @1~-.ISNGII.-.Ot © (~A\~~Ac~~i~f;isKs:~~ATCH ~1R~ESTON STANDARDS) ADJACENT COMMERCIAL SITE £ ---~------ © 5'-6" VINYL FENCE N.T.S. \ " < ~ w ~ \ ~ .., /D/0 (D DOMIDC>.P @ :rxr!OP&I0110Ml!.AU G)S'U"VNl'\.l'Oll ©o"fOoGUf.&c.-ooVf @t1•asi-•~ , I Ii I ~r ® S'-6" VINYL GATE Q) ~'r;::..,>,.',:rt"" IOU..0 @ T>6"~fft'\"""""> @ r•••tiG,~,;;:~ 0 •-fflC(IQl'"-"OIOTTOM ®=~1(0,0,,,.! G)v..10< (!) ,~rt\,G @-- N.T.S. ~=---·- ::.::- .. :-·-·- ----- ·- NOTE: PILASTERS SHAU BE A MINIMUM 2< SQUARE IHOCK PlASTER AND PROVIDED AT A MINIMU M SPACING OF EVERY 50 FEET ALONG All STREET FRONTAGES LA NDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: PRADO ¾ 'P.r,,. "1~ <s ' '',,,,',,,,>/ / Ill t£J ..,,_,,. ,-;-,r· ,•...,..;:;-<1--- i ~~- I i 1 I 1 ! rL 'I .-,·:- ·---1-'- i w TL.;-,-;-J_.l I 1,: I!! · UJ_~ ® MAILBOX CLUSTER AHV Communities N.T.S. L-6 PA21-0838 SHEET 6 OF 6 WALL AND FENCE PLAN ~~I ~'~ TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA d ljlljl 11111! • 11 11 I I I 111 i SONIG/ln8 I 'vWJSnGNf ON11'51XJ -,, __ --_:--,,.,._,,, __ ,,, "·--....,_:.·------- 111 MA TCH.IE SEE BI-EET C-2 7 ~ I ' ~ "'Z~ ', ,~~ ' '\ \ - .. \_ \ \ SUBDIVISION ~UND~ I ;\ ( \ \\ \ \ \\ \ \ ll I I I fi f\ \ I ~ I ·\ I e IU-' -, - .. "!' 1.,~1 /~.g ii?:~ Vil: ~.11, ~; ;~ ;/, .. '# * f -~; ·SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY I I I , I t I I ~ \ ~r,':> -::,1'-91 \ \; ,(('\~" ,~90"' l~'""==---=-1 -l~r, t.".1,f:>\ •' t:1QUSE PLAN ND EL.EV. l!\TJOt,/ I..EGEIID 0 6 fll.M.J• 0 D 0 ~11CW ~(SPNaN)- D.£V1UICIN 8 (C0 1TAG£) • D.£\tt 11CW C:(CllliF'Blll,N}- 1,) ,, ~ g "' _, ~ I:: 0) ::, "' ~ ~ 0) " '" J. \ I MACO CEM:l.0f"IENJ" "-AH lll1C s'IW80t.j Pl.NI I ncv,rncw j OtMHnTY Is TOTAL • • • I 51.efDTAI. • • • .I,, s.81DTAI. - - I - I U JD TM. ■ ii ii I I St.en>TAI. I .. I , .. • • • - - - PA2HJ838 ~ ~o~ .._,.. TEHT~~-- C -3 4116EIBE~-C:<'CIDN,,,__n,Sut-..a ,26 O,JO ~1125 00 0,1,re PRODUCT Pl.ACBENT PLAN ,.. JIICL as•~"- - -11 ().:!J.Sn af..t{ QN /1 5 /X J SQNfa1tn8 I ---J - ---- EXISTING INDU"T ' .J RIAL BUILDJNGS / / EXISTJNG INDUSTRIAL! BUILDINGS ~ll ~XXOOUX)( . ' ' n; II =W .. :! fll m1 i ~m !Ii~ !! ,i •~! ""i ,., m p u~i~ !Hi UU~ii~ ,. ... usnn -•- .¥ !I I, iii l!li''"l Ii M !j- li' :1u~ i' ijii p,.,!i !~! - ~•z! ,. itU jifs ~ii ~! M gli . .,., ••f ~i§i! • ·•· !UUh • -~ ii . .. ·f;,1 ·, i! U! • ii , .. oi !H!i ~· i !-K~ I.• !Ii ; 28' m i;u ! a ti~~ "' •· .. ,, •¥• f';;I ~ ~••J' ·~-i g~~iw i ~~ ., !1 iW ;1 j,; !,• ~J iiiU!a •~· I "i1 i~l~ ~~:: -, • iii ,~ ! ~~~~ i§ri Ip, ~ ~~11 ,R i~ ,, i!!;•is ·~ H Eal ,.n;i:I iU 1, :f~ ! i! ! o0 ll p¥1aid ·' !• •!!i ''I! ~! eaw;~ ,,;. ,,-11,1 J i; H mi I !' !i ,~!' ~!i Ii i,i j !ii ,z i !1;~ -~·~ i~i~~,. i i~iiH< ,~1 •i ~~! !! i! !I! H ~;~f ~ n 6!~:::ililf ijt, •I •§-1 !, '•" ., p~; ,:,~• mi .m1•1 ' ,sa ! ,. ·- !,\ !.!! m ~., ' l"" ~~ U~! ,:j~;~ ~ 1, !:I;:; ~E•j•!I I'! !if! ., ; S! i 0~2 n:,: ' !i '!' !!- ,;i :, 'i~•I uu :ms!, i ,, !> !Hlll, §I, • !• ~~:~ ii• •• !i! ii !U; 1•-i ~~ !,~, l !! ~~ Ii! ii§! ,1, ~ ,, !j! I Inn ,l!!,1, ! I ~, ~~~ii~~ •U , .. ;! ~i 'ii ~u I ., l;i ,~11 ,1,1;~: ~~ \!'!" ~ ii' I ~, h; !, ~mi e a ;ii;:: eligUi 1: !· n;; !H ' ·~ !~h .g!, 111•!1! ! g;; ill: ;!I ' o! gg IE< ::II'::-;: ~~ "!' l i~~ ii lirs~ • ii r~ I ,,gpii i! !, f !•'i ,!r11!i 1•1 l I!' l!II u~ • n ;i~ &!! ~~~a §i"I ' i i ,. ii a! l d'J •' ~·- !'" 11 I 2i~ ! i ;.~ ~i!~ !!!i•1' • ;~ ~ !j'i•ae! :i• "''I i'• !!" ,w. ieli I I! o,~ u ;U !i;i ,ii ; !· " •!' •: !!'a o!!E~ 'i'·'·! .! Ii ' i •1,,, ,i ,1, i ;~ ~~: ii !!~ ! ••i .. •'!= !ij', ·i-· i 1.,,: i • ~S@~ij~~ 11, !i !~ 11: ~!ti i!~ itH i!~il1i ~!'I ' iiwi ,a ,. ! H 002 ~' g<" ~'- ii ,M !i,l! !; ! ,, ~i ~ 1•! all <!! a i~~~ •ni, I 3f ··•=.; h .1 !!ii !~! ~! i jl ;~ .. ~ n1 ~ii l ,-. ; ;· ij i~! ,, ,~in ,. ,i! 1! ! •" t~= I ii O• :~u €~~j • • g,!h • 11! • [~I "! ~li ~1 ~ lo ,,. i!" i''·~ , ' , :jsi~! ,o, ! ~ i~~ ,1 "2 i•! • -~ ; I ' ' ~ u ij •u•1 ~liJl,l "' " 1•g1 mr "l' §' !!Ii~~ " " ·~·, p "! !I p .. , nH H ~l ~~ ~ ~ I •H H I~ ~~ *· .. ~ ,- n m, !! , .. !;;~- "'"' !M I ;ijiR! ,l !" ,i ~i i~ ~!il;;: ;~ i' ii 8~ I •; ! :~iii ' ;: ac,! imi 1:i~ •! ..... liji~ §' ,. lo i"i 2:1 ~, ~i ~~ ! !a i~ i '~ ,, Hii •'•i~; ,, i! iii! 1, §; ,t, iii i ' !B~ai jc :• .,·1 n~1ii ii •i j~ i" !! n *! I oi ! :!111 ,I i o1 ,. ~i~~~ •·h i ~i jl,~ !· ~~ ii i,, ~g~ H ~~ i n <2 ~1-1 ~, s~')I: ,, i, H i i u !I 'i·· •i~m ;i;ii3;!:1 ~i i~~ij • ii .,, hg H ,. ! !! !o" ;i !' •!p. .. ! ,, ~m B,i! !~1: g 1,w~ ~~ ij•1 i! i~ 11' ~; ! I ~~-i~ o! "e !; ~n .. 1!s• '" n i cl ,,i i~ •• ,- 11 i ii • ~i •;!1 ,. .. o, .. I !~ i;~Q! I • 1; i~!; ~~51 i liil!i '" ., ·, ~'16 z~ji; !i!C iJ 1, hiil ~ 111• i ~ !i~ ... ,i 'e ii !ii ~'o i, 1i !~ i i~ h ~~"' 1!"2l 1ii! ,,.,!! ., ;ij; qo • h §ii ., ! . i!f;I~ !! .. ,,! •llj I I J ,I I ,., H 3! 3! ! !;:,, .. Ula~ ji i> ! !. ' !i m Hh •ia! ~!:! :1 i i~ ii! 2"' •• ,! i ,, ~§ih:i i •• !~F i !•! , . ~~ .1, "· f;!i Q, i j;i • ,.;.! i• !• ~" a .. ~i 1<ocl:I! t~ 2a Ii '"1!:l F• i~ l h ~ ~u im .,.£ I -n1,, s!1- s~ i~ I ,gm I ~~ ,, g;!~ "'·i· ,i ! ~! ., ,,, .. 1B ' ,. ~h! • l8 !i! i~ ! i~ H~·i Ii i ~i i2t ii!! iS6n I i~IM !i j ,. ·• ·• i .. J!r~ ~.i a• i • I ,1 ! .• l, ' ~· i §:i IW e ;ij?t~i U11 11 Ro 11 ni ;rn ;; ., I I ., ! i Hi I ! "'i ;;~ ! i I, ~;11 1, ~-, )!j, • mm •I i• I• i[i i ' ! § .. iii .d gm ~~ I 1• d, Ii I ~Id I i. ! ,§ I ! !~ ,! ! ~~2!:l ;;18:! ~i~r~~ 31,! ii I ~, .. t!, I 3¥ ' a•i: !~ Rn -~ii! j! Iii i • •ji ! l!1•~i .,, < e ~, ' il;i ~· ~ • If~ B"~ ! •; !" ~ ", ~~ i •"! ,, \I" ' ! . ! ' oA • en I m m --< z 0 m X Qo G> m z m ~ r- z 0 --< m en Hji ~§U !i~ !li " 1m111ill ,- !,! .!•• 1-i ii! 11 U~! ~i~ ~! '"~~2 !:Ii~ m l,!,!1,1 ' l1i' ~~; 1~1 ;;:i ,i,,! :, · !;i ~•o ~,~ H W!i~!! ;Ii! I!~! 1j, .. !~ .~! h 1,:•1:~• iii Ed~! ~!I ·1 ~!!1,i,f ig:i! .. ~! 1. ~~H iU ,~:'iij! , .. ~!'! i;;: p~IHe~ m l!U ~= ta ., &•j •i=-~~~u i~ i, ,¥. i~ i!~!!~,i •'2 ,. m ;i, !!i~ i~ ii ., .... !, ::;il~ i: i111m: ,,, 1W ~~ ;i~ s! l!!MU lit a""o iS ~i' ~!;~ .. ¥• < ···1· •i• f) ~;! i~ l!•!~ii! i2! so s~ ~·hp·' ,1; i!, ~ !I ~~:;: i~ ~~i !ii! .H ii~ "l ii•, m u~ ~i "P !- !,i!j~•! ;§ t,• i; ~~ .i g •• ", i !~U i!H ~I§! .,, l!l ' ! 11~ ! gp;; .. r !azi 'i;;11: ,., hi ! 1:!2 !!ii m: ~ig 3;1o ~u2 ·••! i:: 1 ~~~, i'.11~;!: ~,~~ ~~= .. :l:l; !'°' g~!~ -~i :,; • !~~. n!I i:y ! Wi ~In -:;:2s ~!i !j, ~ ~,~~ !ai" u~ '·i ' m; HH i~~i ~S, i ~~§! ., ~n h~ .,. UI i,i ~Olj'.;;~ l~i! ~~~! ,1•1 i~~~ •"1 iJS .. ,,.~ Hi 1!1 i nf ,1!! m1 {';•s •la• ii, ~i. ! !:,! ·~~- ~m !i .. O':I! ' ~,:,~ m ' i'~ ~~~, K~il !! i .g~ ~§~2 u ~El ·•· i!h ~Z!1~ l; I ta1 ;ii~ ~•!j ~, •· ... 8j ~ ! ~ ' ~:!~ i I ~ .. LIGHTING SYMBOL LIST OUTLETS SYMBOL LIST SINGLE LINE DIAGRAM ◊ ♦ <) • ◊ ◊ .-0-, UQfT(SURfl\CtlllOUHT} WITH IC MNJTE$ IIATTtRY,N:J. lOlt!REctSSIIOUNl} =:==n~RY,..Cl c:a::::::J ~ ,·xn.OtT WITHmlllMJTU ... TTl'RY,...c:.c ,Y. E.IIEJIQENCVUOHCIUOEY{) • e EXl'TSKlN(CELING.IIOJIHl'.1') EXIT$1GN(WAl.llD.INTED) ♦ "' "' "' S,. <lfC10Ul'I.Uuc,.,fC0UNT[R • CONl'RCUVl""80,/laCCUN'TUl El- CUl'I.UWIUH(TYP....:,.,[,;tl/OITT.lt) - ~Ol.lER.,.._,S6(TYP.A80VECOUNT'ERI ,on «· ,no"-"'""'" , . ..,.,,.o, "··-·"""'""""f!Oot ,.,.,_._,,. .. ~~LOl .. n lN I•<""""_.,_,_ ~ ~ w © LJ 0 0 4 ,---···-·- SITE LIGHTING SYMBOL LIST • ◊ 6 ,u ,u,..,., .. , ~ , -~ ,.-, ""'- '-""'""""· - .. ~ ... ., ...... u...,,.,,,..o, .. ,,...,....,.,, ,. .... ,., SWITCH SYMBOL LIST $All SINCl.EOOlf.••OONTROl.lONU,LO s­ ~- 0 CIAYI.Otl$(N$CMl(CEJING) (3 0::0.,,,NOCVS(N~CCR.NC) "" ---= MECHANICAL SYMBOL LIST lfi FUSEDO!se0NNECTSWTCl1 D -.FUSl;QDISC~NECTSWITCH $y THf:IIMAl.lTAATED11'1tOTOIISWITO! $.11 -IM)TOIIIIATEDSWITOt U® =~-~·~·~ ®-,~···" ~ ~ ,-,,··~·•~•~ffi ,~-~··" A[!JI® OiNAU$TfANCV') ~ ~ SJ1101l!WCTO£TE1;T011(:SOO! "''" •u•Lr.•• Hm" · ·v·1Ur,: · ""'~"'"'"""'"' "''"'"••••t,,n> "" f o.,J,, y~ ::.:..-:.... ' @,e> _t_ 121' ];! ID €) MISC SYMBOL LIST 9 $MIXEOCTtCTOIIIWtDWll(O""Ml'T(Jl'fllo\CIW, 00 (D 0 ;; SMOOIEDETECTOIIMl;lc.ueo,,JIOQ<QaJOt:1:011110 1Wt-E0""8ATI'E~Y&AeJ;;UP i{i) .IUHeTIONIIOlfMLl.llflQffi'T£D) """ """'"~'~'"''c,;.,-.u.,..,_..,,.,.,., ...... ,,, •• ,, ,..,,-..,101~,c Lft- -~1'-...1,:;a,·10N1"1otoic,o,., """ ~1.;:; d':! .. '~.!.:."::,:,-1•_,, .. ,,,,,."" ,.ou,., - CONSTRUCTION - GENERAL - 1- .. -- -· ,_, ,...,. __ ., co ,,_ .. ,_ .... , ...... ,_ •• , I :::::::- .. I 111 SYMBOLS LIST I PA21-0838 ABBREVIATIONS 11 G GOUVIS JS,.1...Jro,,.1.er lr.1t1< ~ ... ,~.,1~ 1,.-.,,., 1cl ';1497•~1"11 ~.;;:~;f:11i:IO PROJ ECT PRADO SITE LIGHTING DE VELOP ER ~COM MUNITIES WR OEVCO . lLC 150PAULAR INO ,SUITE02SO CO STAMESA.CA S2626 ARC ... HTECT· ~ TEMECUlA CA REVI SIONS ■ ABB REVI ATIONS & SY MBO L UST PROJECT NUMBER 65763 £NO INEER ~ SHE ET NU MBER E-0.2 ~I -- ~ o -~ , L ,,, _/(, /,'1 r - I i ,. , I{ ·Ir , I . /-- 0 II i f'/!!Jrr/:. ·1 11·.,,/_'_!~ 'i .c I ~.,Jr i' f'' , /_ I f ;- I / I ! ~ ·7 ,'. I /o . -~ /::,.., - • } I , ·' 'J f /r / //c_-,, - - ~ /;}, •: I l ~lib /J! bC!l / /~ i'J /fr :-p:: I / /' -=o..- / /' ' 11 C!l / • -1.'2 , _, - -. 'I I r:r---o, C-,:, I I .; ' - .. I ·- /___L. //I ~/I/ t p/ ? i rfi I I ii jJ - , ! I - -,J --- ·ji- ol! •:111; l,t I --_-.Jqp/_J!J I I' j 'i'o (i:J'oi d '/1 -- I - j_ - I!// i~/J-- I 7 I ,, ,_ ' /I~· 1!1 /: /1l /1 z 11l 1(-~j_ ·/ 4 t,L~I l[ ! -1 / ·rJt I 1ilJ0,, ; '0,/ /~jl(-::J° IJ '/ - I #0 1. - 0 I J r; •··1-:.:r,,,~- ~1/ );~,,.~= !1 -0,, 4 ," 4 I ;1/V 7/Ft~~-,,_JI /II r;rl 1' I I ( 0f ,!J !!11 f11/r j t- -:_- _- I J/1 l. //1-_Jj if. JJ{ I j /' - /)(j ,,,~ /•0 1,: ,I _-/- -:}1 _ y It \Oo--- ·-°: - ~~cj'~L!/1 9 f'~r /. I; 1/f //, f_~ _/ ;// 0o ! -) __ t 1'.1 I J / , __ i l_ /)!/\ - 7f ·--- I 1 !/ ! ' , I O • I I --)/4 II / I - <so I I - l O - fJ I I// - - _- - - -- - :::- 0 11-J/; . ---- ~ i 1'1 j -1, - - - :.::_ :1-'l.?-- / ' 1,. ~ fb. // I • -- ' 1 f~"'--- - 1 1 1 , 1 - , - -1- r . i I ' -t 1(11_],77~-// d/111 ' ~ /if:_J,- d ; - ;,G /r- _-1 L_,11---.1,,1,/0 I ~( t'1 ,f '-f ,.;/ ilh. 'P l1 - 1 -J/~,~ / ··- ", J•; \ / /1 ! ~ I; --o/ --- --CC-1·1' ;;--~"; , I I - ::~~ / 1 I' ,, ..._ ---.... t I/, 1 , I - :r:. t ::c::. _ I , /1-L !i1 /Ii 1 _ -, /,;'! 1.? r 1 f:f I , ~~~/ 11 / / ' ( 1_,N'j,e· - , If --; I, I ;,I I I ;fl' 0 ' j' fr -J , '-, -._ ;Ji- _I 1!/ / 0 / '/ I - - 1 __ ! 1 ,, • 1 1 -r - I '7, 1 ·11 • - ' d I r 0 /J l i-,.?-"'~-~ -- ·- !~ 0:/;·11 r---,r - ; - -- 'IC 1, !0 1 ,11:.1 .I I ·/;7 // ?*'', 1 / ~I(\ r/1 -, / ·-.r c_T !_; I I /.----_ ,; 1 1 /.i/i __ 0/:~::"""J ?~1 1/ Jr/ 11/ 1 1, 1 ,- __!/ __ 111/ - - - 1 11,10-- , I I , , ., , , I i t I o:> I j I l f, , I , I J 1/1 11 -. J1 ,_ 11,1 - 11 , 11, 10 , .....:..:1, __ r 1 / 1 , .... I/ I " ... J ( /JI ~~ I I 1,_~~--1/l, J;j·--'·_-1-J_!:--1>111/ ,,1i"--J,-c----- i'1 o~ r-- - 1 -&111 1 , --- r-:-,,.; , /1 !1r -. J /j, ;11 7 ' '=.J__ I I = ; 1 - 9,LJ s.--;/1.._ 1 / ;// 1. I I/ r ' • __ , 'J _ • .I ~-JJd!J!fji';;';J 1 ,11 /- r io, -11-11 I /, >r;) 1 1 I I"-- I/ n --~/ if,I 1(( j ---.. r ]j J II ii ,4 ~ ,,','::__ 1►-_ /! fi:: · Ur1 . 7 -,\ .g , c, - '[' -- , r - -_ --1, __:__h# ·1 '!o :-c / ~ I'< I •/ \\ .- , /c ] / I I / - 'o I ~~r ,<~, ·-A .1 11 \' _J1 ;Jfr J1r'-,1ff i/;s·~0r0~/r _-_'.£-\\._ '<,/, ) [\~ \,\ ,. 'L · f"i; j/f/ Ji 'qof I - "' '' / ,'- / J \ ll:, \\\ J O ' I L -JI J I I ~ , '', -<.,,, ,y . ,· \ \\ "--.--~- I ---L - " AA,~\'\, '<,.,• ,, ~(\ ,\ ,, .'' [/ ,,-½._,,yJ I I ' ---1 " / ·,~Id;)> ,, / '\~ \ \\\' Yi: ' I --1 < v~~~·;;~ \;::'( .. \ \~\ '3\\ ' /h 1 ·//,/ I1 £ "X <: ~ \~\.~ \\; .. \ ''\\ \'\ L J;, __ ·1 ,Jr ·\ . '- '-., I < \ \\ ,/ ., \ , \ \ \\ - - ~ / I/ I 0 ', / ! - \ '\ • ,\ \ • , \\ \ \\\ ,, --~~J ,J ..j.,,_, : , ' I . , ,\, \- -·---·--- ) !!:',~,~~-------_:•\----~~-':"--f\:·'~{'\:-::· ~)----- ·~~\ ' : " .,. \, /, ~'\ \ / ' ~ \ \_ .:; ; ,\\\ \ \~ l . ., ·Io/ KEY PLA N =· \,, \I .,-' \ d.• \ / ORATTeR \\<;,'A~ .. <:; <, \ \r.; ,\\ '31, / .- . /~\<\/~! ~ C°?R ':' '"""~""" \ \,),, z · :i,'( / \ l. ,. .. • , \ · ,;; E-1.1 I \ \ \ "" ,, /~\\a \ i\ ~~ . " / \ \ \ ~ PA2l -0838 SITELIGHTING PLAN - AREA A 1 -- \ ~.,..-·.\._ \ \ \\\ .,., \ -~\ \ \ °' . \ .,..,, . . GENERAL NOTES (!) ~.;~.~~H-•-•K•-•H=.--•K -ONIOffSWITCHANOONEOF'ME'C..ICESIUOW •l'HOT0C(UANOM01-$EN$Qft ·l'H010C[UAN0AUT°"""TICTN[SWITI:>< -,.sl ~LTN EQ.OC ~ MANl,IAI.QNfOFFSWITCHC.S~HOTOYEllAO(TH[ ... UTOWl,TIC CONT"°'-HIOICTO,SUSTED"80'1E CD ~!x:°t1~=-'o!:-r"w9:'~1:01.m av,...0tocm,.,.01MI! (D =~~:.+:.:r:.:~~!.~";-.0:S-ESST><.\N24FECl,NIO LIGHTING LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE ""'"==":i:'.i!,\-- oeSCR1Pr10N I MANUFACTl,JqEA I MODEL NUMBER I LAMPS I ~:W"sl NOTES 01 ~ , ON,~. -..-w.TYJ>CV WOE -.=w lLED 1 UJWl:~~EIIUI\L 010.f>[oN ,~. AP1.21,-10W.rrPEVW.DE--=wJLfD I , .. •wl:;~~D[QU.\l 0 l°tjO' ON,~. APl.2MOW.TYPEVW.DE--=wl•EO I 24&1W1:~~4;0to.w. 01 ◊ l•N 1-" 1Eol1:iwl~r-O"eo NORTH G GOUVIS Ir.""' ,ot ~~Q 7~:!.h,l~ ,a.,w ,,.15?~5'1 ~~~~TI,~~~~•5~)0 PROJECT· PRADO SITE LIGHTING ~ AHV COMMUNITIES WROEVCO.LLC 150PAUlAAJNO.SUITED2'50 COSTA MESA, CA n626 ~ LOCATION TEMECUI.A CA REVISONS ■ SITE LIGHTING PLAN ARSAA PROJECT NUMBER 0 :u:::r;;~;F::::::::-LLB£ ) / -PHO TOC tu AH OM,IT<:10,,.n::T .. E SIMT C>I ..-.s!ROHOMa.lTIM feL OCC ..........i. ONIOfF SWITCNES 5"".t.LNOT ov,RMlE fHf,.UTOMA.TC e0NTROLfUNCT10N5US'HC"'90\IE CD ci ::X:°'{':.!1s~~ci!i~~'i,.,8;~T:o..sEceYP11 0roe m ""or"'"" CD ::=..~=.~.!:t':i:~!i~~O:lmnw<)<FEET,>.1<0 I 31 ~ ,/ ~- / Jt1~7fll~~)~]fv~f ¥/~-- - J~~r.JJ .. _-1fl 1J '~- 2_ J'_ ;j tr __ ,·v~1(~)l ~)_( i :}J_ fl cfi Je:J,} f [ l"Jfic}f] /( \ _/ ~- .. -. l!l(/!J. ;'. l ;:01r, !7ur-~if•1·r" fee.-,~_ 1_ /!;~ .-,--!/' pLf [r/-£;-lrif1, ~-.J J_l r / /, - ~/. ~L 1 I., f!r--1' I 1/111 ~if :--1 = / _j -----. ~ • - ,, L---.J -U1_ k w_ / ,, . ., , 1 --~1-- ·- ,----C, . d ', , ~ 1 I j --Ob==:::: .. __ - ~ _ o1>-Jr--o- ._J _!t 1 ! -~<cc, --~ec_c2c._cc;:,, \ •- I Ve_'"'' / ----i""-_ -"<,'· ·/;----. I ~-l '"'"'--- --= - - - " " ,, I 1, ---, r-·---- . --- 1- ~-- =~--- \ ·, -,_ r. _ ., --, ,-----, I -r - - - - ---""~eo- ,) cl - - ' . -, ' / r jf j 1 _1- -~/ I ]lj r,,"-17[··. -71-J-7_ ;_:~,;-,) '<' : 1J l j, rJ I . ,-, , , i - ,J [t, / / I/ I , 1h11 ~rr~. ,,t ''-''' ,.,, , .. -- . ---J ' ' =~r 1 4-f'_ W:_7 /1;/J_,.-];;-~ 7 / __ r !_ )_[[ ·m~J/1 !_llJfJQ~{;r; I (! ' /L - -, / u 7 I I, ' f-• I / i f fi di '[~ _;;;~~~~"-11/f fir_1JfJrrtr:J r h -- / I~'~"~~- kr_ 1J~!GJ1 ~-'~F?i __ L ---1/b __ Jf\~;j I ft]~ ~-~N- ~ll ,;Ill 1!7[_, I;! J I. ' i -c.______~:;f;FL;.01_]?/in, r __ ·_-----. ~=i· . ~-L !tu; rJ;. '-)Jc!; 1 ! I --J I C J ! L _ _J tJ Lt; 1--"'o/; / fn- . ~ ---1·, . ! I , ------ . - --- L , 11· 11_ =-_ =-rc~n"~:)T:l ,__ ,11.2~'5:!!.~~ I ' ' f j Iii r,, ---1-r-, I ·1 _,,.,,..,,,,,.,,.~ r,1-a.J /1 q J __ --:-c._YT(t.:::nr I I • . / j I 1-; "'$(!,i---- / I I \ I ,/ I • - ""1'/"'=· ~-----+·-·-·-::;::--':::::::. 77'T' - '-- LIGHTING LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE \ MAR K LEGEND VOL T MOUN T DE SC RIPTION I MANUF AC TURER I MODE L NUMBE R I LAM P;r ::wJ NO TES I 0 ~ •• ~• ~-•~• l=u }-~=-=l"' J •=J;:::,,.= 0 O.,f) 120 ,OO L[ "0U:LJOiT 0 D-?"0120P'OU' ,OLtLOtT ISOLEAA I r.\ I A I __ I.... I --~--- 1 .. -- 01~ / I ~ I V 1-1-•• 1-•--•-,cc""' !•••~•"~'~ I•-••,.•~- I •o I•~ IE?~~" I I ""'·"""'"'=.l:."r.~\~- ~ 19uw1:,~~:,:0EOW.L --1~CCOUAI.. G GOUVIS _....,._....,.., . In""' tA "~~I~ lrrn1< 1ol ~19 7S~lt,I ~ 10, '4~.7~~ ~;,1 P~hn:ipo n~ 1d71,1,.3:;)U'l0 PROJECl PRADO SITE LIGHTING OEvELOPER N-N COM MUNITIES WA DEVCO. LLC 15'0PAUI.ARINO,SUITE02SO COSTA MESA, CA 926'2ii ARCHITECT ~ TEMEC I.A.A CA NORTH REVISJON S Ii SHEET NAME SITELIGI-ITING PLAN "'"'" KEY PLAN PROJECT NUMBER ~ 0 ,~- "' ~ ENGIN€EA OAAFTEA· PA21-0838 SITE LIG HTING PLAN - AREA B ~ ~ -- St;tEETNUMBEA· 11 E-1.2 0 © 0 0 I ◊ ~ ~ o-0 ~ ~ i i i i ~ ! ' ' ' g ' ' ' ~ ~ ' ' ' r § ' i Gi i & ~ I ~ -j ! z ~ G) r C s: I t t ~ i ~ ' ' ' ' i • ;u ~ m ! ~ CJ') . (") I I I I I • m 0 0 • I ~ C • ~ r ! l ' l • m • ~ l • I • . ~ ' ' i i i • • a 0 d! ~ x' i ! i ' pl! I ! ! , . ' 'U i' " i' -~ ,1 j! •! i! 6 !! J i• • ! a• ~~ ~ i i i ~ en =i 7' m m r -< G) "'Cl I s;: :::j z z o "'Cl s;: L z ~ "' ► z ;o 0 m ;o ► -; I 0 r;n 1~,, 1~ in Ii ~~ ~~ wi w~ I I I I --- -- ; -t--JJ~-IT---- ~1 I .. flf.l]} 'fiJ/;3 ) -. !i I tj~ _Jl(-;-J t1r--=,1.. I P _ f~~ --:o:--~ __ /;/ .. ",-..,. 1 /1,_. m.::.:.:__h- -- L_ 1 1 .J7 r~ 1 ~--> 1J., .. ~: - ~1+/fr --m1 g__ ) w1E I >i_---f.11 . i,r"'r~Jr:;,,_ ~, '-::.~f - - - ;C.f/' I I ---- - L 1.___t--f t!A P/1 \ "::: :. ::Jrl~- : : ,. :. ':' : :: :: -~ ~ A - r-·-;rr-- ·1 Ir I r---111 lJ1 -__ -1 ~/ :·:::<IJ l;/--;;::·::·'i' : , • . . . - e- l .J --, I ,-- · "·- ·• • ·" : f/J ,..;J;/,'t IJ i' · ,:.. a,, " • -·-- i- - - --i::-- / -L i i i j!; ,H.)/4;· r- r-::--~··G~f,1· . - 7~ f g C. "·• Ll~ - ) f; ';; 1/J £/ I 1- ii= I ~:_ ,, . I . _--- - . • f;:_-•"""- . -:::.- I_•~~;;·· -· /2 1 ....,,rr:~ .I//: , .. ,1/j~L ';•· Jr1·r I□ s ·•-1a• _! r ·-~ - ~- ·~- - \ .. , · --1JJJ7~~-- 1;&.J:;·,:y0:t~ -· ;1°,1i - r·· ·;;:..--=- - . · - -- . : . .. - ---- 1,/ 1/J- ,;·,--··--"" ~· . - . __ _,-- ' - .. .. 0 ·- -- - r:; " ,.-::,····I' r-=f" . ~Cc ••-- "' ..__, ..____.., .... I t·' ,, .. ~,~,~ .f:.i j ~ J ., _.,_ .• , .. .. [ 1r--- ----1 -- j],,.,.:,.:,ili~--; 'n ! -= _,_,_ . /~- 1~ 1 ---- - ~)' .: - ": : .- : : -, -- ) - ] ,--1 -•-AA.:. ,-,~ .. O:~"=~ , ANDGLARE(BUG) RATINGS i I I /; I -----71/; ' :: '" ', :¥"•""' - . _- n ::c...-=;;:::-- .. ~;-- ~. ;1-- I !d 1· 51; i .. .. :: : ..... : . "c""""-- ' Cl ;,. ..;::::;"'•- ·::-- ":" -- ·"- t:" 1- T- ' / ·1" ~ - J." :,.'. ·'. :- . : . ,. : :-- ,;,,,;,,f.-_. --=-==-· : : : : i,,,:-+11;:)f ::: :;-:":: t-::7] I ::·, -~= ,.. ... "~ ~ ·- -•-- • • • : ..-, i: ::, "'"f. ::·:-; '°'. I -.::: ¾ ~-- " .-,v·>B;,,,, : . .. . . . ::· ,~. :····-"'-"""""' - . ' • ,-,;: I ' •• " ,.. "' " I It _ ,_-,,,.,,___ / 1 ,. :"": : : : ,: f1,~E • ·;c·ii.~- o:::: it,:: _ ... ,. ·ca;:.-_-"-,::::., : , :;:,: , ; •" ~ ,c. :::-,·~.:.:.: .._ .._ Jj !!-"'·"' -/41) uJ' - ..... ••0c·····' -· .. ., ---··· ·---· • • ~ "e· · ,,,·· ···, / - ., ~,r·:""':;1Y /Blf~--~r"" _, ::--·----~-- .. : ::,:··' ;::·:: .... ,,.;,, / -f -._ C !It/'"''" •11 < -- •• •'SC>; =-::•- •••- l"e••+}-''''" :,•w.: :-J.>,·i·u: ; ;-1r1.if <r-- -!J',; '"'i.l ~ 11 w , 1 7 /; 1 1::17; -· iii-E-~~~..;;:-.w-=."F"- §i Lfl1.:· .. :~i m · lb .ttii. /!{l-11_1~· 0 c:/4- ,YJ/UIJ: 1i ,~ r:) 1 ~··- 1 - f ~~~- _ 1½11; · -~;;.,:.:-:=--=;;- i..rf! r:!i·H._1t ... 1 ;---:.:--) / 1 I-~ ~ j /2: ": "/// - -1, l!t:1 ':::5=/.,/;- j i '-"""" ,~I--'/ ::~.------ B' k'I" :; "" e't'" //"--Y / f/ C1-,,._· { • :• ./J/ / / . ] { > ' -="- ~=i+-l•-,. ::: :o-lu• -L;·}; i ; [r.:/lr--~ .... 0~' c'fl 9 1 ,-~--.J- F ~- -l L.. )c1111 ~:-,·.=--- r.-.:F==-==- 13: 1 i p·aii" ::: I" (~~---,;:-ltn·--J, ,/2" ;l\ ·i::::;.»~,r--J1r1r,··-]tr2---p1 ~' ;;;;:;~.:.: ~1i¥'ii .iH}-=cif i zl,,>.\.__.._;;;.~ r, Q}....__ 4ft: :/::W:;,-r""-~ --o.---::!:i_ - ~I. I 1'' ~'rl f :i:;~: :::· ~:~ ::: . /._ "'" "'"' ··- if .,,.,,'!,7 ~--- - ' r I -~ .-,. ... "'1"'+"' / ~ ~f~:: .. , .. o½ ' , I/': .... ; • f"',C ' ( ~= -l .. , .. ::: ::~ ·-·i·· :-:: / r -/l :~' . :)i;:.::~-::= [J ~1 r; .. ,.✓i•l //! !___jffe I 1~/~"'::?- J -· >==J rt:i::::p ,:: l :Tl ct,,, ·,·'';/J•J~; ,, '" i,,_. ::;N - . .1 . . Ir , I . .... ... "' 'r J<;.J};,. "'1J')·{}::r~=) 1 [ -:::T'.Uf! _-J - _J/f--J/1 .. ,:_,-- ~ x:/-, /- - · ~; ,.:,1'"". ::: :·- \ \\ 1- y- ,- _ ---f-- - 71_ " "·::·:>/)•.:;x:.::::":,::;," !w--:----,-J~- _-1 ;I~--- " v/ '?j:_,:f:;;.;;y{<-"l\f ':~ , /' /,Lr-;! ;:, ·V"'" ' "<'"" ··'" ... . ' , .,,,_- , <> ~~~~ ~I 'tr 17J-- ~ t-Ji-c,-- -J 11 - - -----":/:. ':cc:::; --::>_: / \ 'i,. '. ~, L . , - 01· -~ ·a -< \T_\iv"V '< ·,•·· . ' "' -== ,_____ jj' \ ....... / .... \·K .... ....- \\'""< ,\\\"";;r-'~~~~-:.)~ \\ --== \ ~-- ;( '\ ~ 1,./ ))':: . .-' '-\\-·-·-·-·-::., __ \; ( ~ /;,<~ .... &-\"~ ~\' . ,, : '?0' .l__ \ v' ,;fJK< \\· \ ' :: . ;\\ i \ \ \.«""k\\ A~v "< ~ :::.::~<;;\~ 1 \ ~. i --"-- .......... " ) \,. "'_..·' , ..... ,,. ' ~ ' - \'.\\ - . ' \ :;::\', /\\/\~ ........ \1 . \. ',:-- \) i ~~~TNUMBER PA21-083B ~;:............, ~~~'. 1 SE~1~4 I L j ,1 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DISCLAIMER 11£SULT$0E>OEAAT£011YT>,USTOOI.AAl!PRCMOEOfOIIINl_l_P'U~ONL'l',WITT1CUTNIT~ASTOACC\IAACY. COWI.PITtNtsS,REUMIUTYOROTt<Ell'MSE..THECAl.elAAT[011£SULTSMAVIIEOfP(N0ENTCl'IUSUl-10fO1)o.TAORO-.fl\NOVI0(0flltM PUIIUel.'fAV"-VJll.£SOUltC:£SNf000NOTTIU<£ .. TONXOUNTN.l.fllCTOlt$AHOtlllO,NSTANC:E.$1'11010MEflUCVAWESHAV£1EEN <;AlCUl>.TEOUSiNO MEn!OOli ll[COYlolENOEO IIYTII£ LW_T .. OE1'G .. UIIIHO SOCleTYOFNOIOln.-RICA!IEStU.JNIO.OR ST""DMD !Nl)U$TIIY PltACTlee. PHOT-rTU: tAI.CUVITIONSP£RfOJIME0V$1N0ntl.STOOI.A.111£ a,.$£00N PHOTOM£noc: C,,.TA PIIOYICED 1¥1'>1£ ........,,.-.:wAVt,AHOn<EAt;,;U,V.C:Y0,1'>1£,;,.,,.e,a ... T£0~T-ET,ur;P£!\10111AA!C£1SDEPEl<OfNTOl"T>1£11CCU!V.CYOf'TH£0ATA ==~:~::r~l.:o:::~:L~"~:e~~e.i~~~e~~~g~~:~cu~~:~~~/::r~~~~CDU~~~-)CAN G GOUVIS hlO< \:\ .,,(,!~ ~~hn'i[H'lU~ 1<'17w~i:;:'>il'l0 PRADO SITE LIGHTING beVELOf'ER A.HV COMMUNITIES WR oevco. LLC 150PAULARINO,SUITE02!>0 COSTA MESA, CA 926:26 ~ LOCATIQN· ~MECUI.A NORTH REVISIONS Ii ~ S1TEPt10TOMETRIC AREAA I ~I ~ . >, / I ! - ( )' • ',':J', :}1 '_ r ·}1! :~' ·: . . ~lf ,-; . j,;:;,~lf !IJJI:i?lrr 1/~ !i'iL Jr \ ( ':: ,1,,, ii;::: .. :<,. · t ,-»0,::,,,:_1 .•.-,,, , ,':'?:! 1,t .' Fi ·;: .. ,i/:ts.,:::::/~-.1,-f<;lf-:.c 0•!::·~.{r7· /[ .. ·;\::·,~;r .. ~.,,~:-..;.1 _,;:-:: :.::!J /: ·.: ·,/1.: -- 4 "'-1 J, It::'::; r-, ,,: .-:;.- r·1] , ; ·-: -: .- ... :1.~ 1,,,,:N~/J r,-- 'j! 1--/r- \::'.,......_;_ / ::1:r /:;:x.,: .. ":'·,. tHrJJ~-~-j r I z tn·11f-FF::·· :J~-LJ:- 1 1:1\t · · ;,;-~:: ~ J; :~-->;·<- 1£if--- .. ,f·:'.~ff.~c::"1 LJ-rk· fl.__ 1t- -:>< ;/ :·: ·w" ;r_ ~"o. - ~J ti I 1rt: ,., ... -t : - l. ~ I ('· / L-=- / ,/''. " : : i' ·z: ;;· '"",, / / 17--....o; I· //i·: ., ' I , 1 1. • 'rl ~- - ,, ....... ~ "i) .. r / I , ·f-:)-1 .j., ,,, I ' .. ;·,.,'ftr.. / / , •:.! 1 .... ,1 r;~ . : 1' ,r-~ --,t--p.,_ , : , - ; ... ~, J, /': .-:._,.•;·; · th~ 1 ' l.1• I fit., .. :~,- --- -- , r : -_ __ '.::. :0:--c_ - · .:, .: .. ::: :J "- : .. ·.\ •- - . '1. - '-L:.,. / 'j ' :::[ r· .. .::. /{1·.- :: . .-:n - • ' '•. -=:c -. " ~ i;-L-[J 1:,., .. ' . I I Jr- "·h· , I I , .. , ·•. "!':r: '"~••-.,. '"-"s,,, 0 .,,,· __ , ,., , ') -'f· ,,~,, J !•1 N' .,, /T :, · '· . f,: • · . ., ..... , " .• ,. "'·. ' •. ' 1 . 7[ / 1 ,, • ' • :,· f' '}, ~;l:~:' }tL;(\c,.\ h:J7 '}',}'.l;!t\~,\ / I r I . 1 1~ 11 r-l1;, 0!/u1 fJ~ ~ --n~~:,tri·; 2-r-:~;~1· ~~:i :-i:~:l;i!,~\ /\ W/ LJ ///~, I l" 1 // ~ . ~JI ! , .l .JL 1 -~- 1 I 1 1 I 1 -~1-; ff,/ 1 • ·? ~ · i,, I '--~1,'1~:1 ---=:::!...,.r ;j 1, f I l~;fU!hJi' I /1tlt1!l271n11r 1 111/ ?!// .. /'· ;1, '1: ! 1 , I if!,::;, .... I .:»: ~- J .;,:,,-,.y_11 f .. JC... /1. IL J11 r· - 1 !_ 1 Jlj I J /f--::;;r; 71,11 I tf-~-,11!1- <:;-11 t-- I -·--;r __ ; 1\ ' · ,.- · · :c-t,~- · · i 11 ' fft'1t· 1t1 ½' -1! /Ill I ;---j ;- J_//1 ,(-, :!'; 1 : 1./1-/-L:°i}t --Ji1n7--i -~JJ-:~1 1~: ,if- :~1 11 1, ~11ucr; ~I, I' ! / / / 1·,1-~- // L~., I . 1,, ... ·i,... I I . • . , , , ii 7 ... , + •/ • r--~ ..... ;;-, .. ·-1--r//(~7f- 1 r ../ 1 !Jft .,1>11! i /tf f i!J,,, ;'1! ,;1r.rJU-,t~-- j(::.::'J!f i-1-J i;r, ~--71 I 1, 1 , , , 1 I / -...,.. · ., , .. , 1 . / / / f / /,I., · /., - ' /I 1 / // ;.. ? : j ,<-',:: 1,1::e:."'·~" . ' Ill I "'P , . .. . -../ I I I 'i1 1/J ,:/1;, i !;t}ffJJ!,Hrfr1i1rr1i1-~ 1 :_·,:~:: VtfJ 01£1 ~7 ti 1 --'-...i.._· . 1 ' 't I -Ji IL '/ //1 1/ l /, ... ,,,. ··Y --..c.....:: ~'r----r ~ f I I , I I ' , - .. l . L . ..J .. ·••{:.:.:/,-- . •. . . N' ' - I I J '1 - " -- 1 -111·.:.:::--:;1; /J'CT7' '7·1r~ I ~:=!:~~ • _, • ' , • I • "· ,, I H'ftt II~,/ El ~it.·;T~--~i-====;; : ": I : j rEl /., .. ~ ;·· ~,/1 r I c.=.J .TT,. ''1i1·,1-r=r Ir, I / • , ,! .. • • -•-· "/, • U • '"""" ·: . ' '----'~---~.+--·-·,yr.,_ SHOOOMm<CeCANms --·-:=-'''=="- _, /; _JJ, .1· ·-------·-·rr ' ---=-=-,.="'==--=-= < I -·-· ·-·-·- -•-::-="-...,,"1 '--.:,=•-==-=--- __ _ccc __ ~.-·-· , ===-'=>=E,;;:.;::-;;:;:.,,=:;,=- .. CIU~~~~OTHE~...:i~::-J~~~e "".fO-..CECAlCUV,T §:;:::.~~RM;~UQRWM:ETO 0 ?0) " I }· A2 I D 1-1·-- " I I • I I, t .• r ·-~ .. , .... f - ,.,..,,._,...N;V_ ,;w ·..,..,,.._,..,CV cw - :....,,._"'_ I:;~}~ -~--~ .-::::: ]-- -~- 1· .;~.,-. ·-· , ]~=-•=•- ,m " I · 1~=-·~- ,m " I / F···:=~:J .. l 1 " ~~ - - !'.'."""- 1- ..., -·- .. ,~- .• -! + 1 _ .. ~- 1~.,, I., .. I-·· + ,.., +,., 1, .. .,;;..,•7 + "'- •• u,t,.,· j "' §~ d-fit ll~lii/t ~=-:-rf ~:: ::: :::l::: ·i+ :t :::::: ! ::: ~= +~:-1:~ ;:: ii"'-"·•· + . *"" "" u, u, ,- .. -· . + .... , ;7= .. , f"' ~~~l: ~ mttm Ht ,_.,. + 1., .. --1,. ·,u,lu, f'1i, .....;., .. 1-·1 + 1,.,. ·'" ,~ .. - .,, • =:::-j: ! ::.:: ·;: ::: ::: . ,,. . ,=:: . - ! ~:: ::} ::: i~~·: i-::: ' ~~ + Li"" •~ '°':..r'"-'- 1 u, l ~g- ! m- l~ !l~ !1! ,rn I F .... ·1 ......... 1 .. , I ... 1 :::::::: ! ::: :: ::: . ::: tr ::: I ~=~ ! ::: ~=- :!:! ::: . ::: 1 -~ , • I,,. .. ''.'ft:" . "'-1 §~--rtt·li ~~i~ ~~, G GOUVIS --· .. --- 11'1•>< C~ ·•~~I~ (n·u>< ,d \14<)1 <~.lc,l:i lu.,•1.19,i5~H~I !'~!onSJll11if'-" l<'i7V1.}.:;.:\\11Q PROJECl PRADO SITE LIGHTING ~ Al-N COM MUNITIES WRDEVCO .LLC 150PAl.JLARlNO.St.lllE02SO COSTA MESA. CA~ ARCH TECT LOCATION ~MECULA REVlSIONS ■ ~flr='TOMETRIC KEY PLAN PROJECT NlJMBER ~ ENGINEER DRAFTER· PA2l-0838 sI:.E"En'11UMBER E-1.5 I 1//' //, ....--- ~\/\\\_.,/'\ ~•,·, .. : .. '·'·: .. :--··•'.'\·,,_ ;•· 7·.H '--JI L .. 'I/ ' -___,_~ .. ,. '·--. r1···'·'····· .. , ... u. ~- tu 'JI I I \ //. ) ,-,\\ ..>\.,,,-l''.'0,:<::i:'.~\' ---.J/1. ;I; J,; ! p1<:::>1J '~7-·, c· al / , "-- .9-' \./ ,,..\, .. ·,..,.... ~\'···:: .. : .. ·,:<~~"·· -.J/L __ J;· I rEJ ,, .... JJ··'·'·:: .. '·/1 -I ·I~r· •··,"-._.. / '\ -· \_/_,..,. .. , ... -· .... / · ··\ ...,"..-2<:.::~:.::~\ :\ ----~ ' ,' ' f:.:~:~. ~:~:::;:.~:: ~:· "' - I/ / - . ,,-- . . "----- ./.,, \\\/\--.~•·•·-~.;;.; ... ,,\\ -- _l r 1 ---~"'• .. :;;;.Kt-1,~.,J.rrr""'i; ·-,--,..,:. __ ~,CHu,e y'' i< ~/'& \":~ .. ::::;::\\\ i , J /:c .. :":::::::::=p·l 't -J7L... lf! .. -1Jf-.1( r 1 / ,,.✓~, ~~~-~Ill!\ . ~·\ i r ~-- -JM111111t~~iltli/:;r~; \\~~:~\,~-:- ··f\\~;~::~~:.~}\-i:~\: )~/~ \~ . r--~-~-~A:;~\}l.!}}f /:~~~t:Jt;i;?t:It~::1}j \-\~·, 1 V·\\·'·:· .... ~\~ -~ \ ,,s"-'.'(\ \ --:- -v-- c_--D..c-j .11 .... , ... ,.,./, [r 1i·~ ·- .- . [, --_ ·-- ,::::~ --,1 11 {tI)'\r \; /f~'7 --~ ~)'\ 11::J · - }:t:t:J/t r- 1 ~ , ~2 ·1 \-~~~~~\ _I s <:::::::::::r -(~·-"<\j~---.) ,- ': .. -L Ji ~_lu .;l:::::::·::::1-;. b '. l'[; J/1,ii; ) \ 1 -~ U,.- ··.·: ...... :• .. )w~\ \,\0,..,/!) ->I' m· !J /,(; ..... ,,.... J1Lr /[ j / , -· - .. --=---.;---1tt:'.::t~r \_ .. ~.,~---~\ / r·;-- ta- ,1/t:!'.:::;)J:~~--=-- I -=-= -"i'"Fll .11l, .... , .... \ \- \\ '\,,..,.... '·.. ~Jr- 1:-i:-:::. r;·······'···,1, r=, ~-- ~-=- ·1 __ J,~--y - L 1 -- .1 ,~f::::::::: -1 \~/~\\ <\\ 1-::.:¢::1 7: T --- . , :::::::::rfi - - ---> ,_ . _ 1-r~[j\t-.i~ l\1:,e:"\11 ~~> \ :J Lj /Jli)1:\mtrl t!}[[)u, 1 f '_=-} .. \ . L --- ---1 I;; Ht~ff1 \G 0--·~;,?,sC ) \ c__~~~::~k~-i~~}~It}F [ ~J/ .. ~:: ~ ✓--L..~ I I ·-1/1. -·J11 ·-1f·-·1 \'~·············-J -/ \ '-o\ ~. ., .. ::>• , ,.,,. [, }· 1:1i11 . ,:. 1 · ' ·- , .7 __ :i \· :::::::: :r .. ~"e:'":\,\\.,,, \\\ /;;:;?::::: ::: <::::::::::::: :.s-::t%-\ ~ - r 1--;1~- 1 II I [ [. I / j L J~,,_-c-..,., ,.\ .. ,»\ \ \ U\ ,..,-, \1 .. YY c ., , ,,.-.<:-c.-•s• K ~ 1 J - '-· 4 _ . , =~~ _ "A\~;::ffi~\ Y,,,,..::~1im::~::::::::m1~(~:\\\ c-:v , -L. :_"-y~~~~ ·1·;, I 17 hl:fJ 1-r· ~ ~ tc··-~~1 \.-;;<y'•>:".--.,: ., , ·,;-:;,-V''>\ \<(, ',.\ -L - . ,-_, .. + , .. J:T:::r··:=t·" c1_ , -' n I . -~:i:t]::'s'::~;:~~W~ ~::~ :; ' / •C/ _}<:ri: :.t:!::ti~' 1 ,;:,,•/,.,.,,-,.,, . .,,.,_½ \,· ~~-1/, ~~;::;-::::-,./\ \ \ .. -<; ,- ..-'(,....-( , I .. r-- ... =t. + b,.tL Ji. I,_ [J -11r-r /Y/"""" " .. ,:..--- > ~ / \ \ ,, ., \ - , ---- I ,' ,,,,..,T+ 1 ........ ct t, .. , • /v',,, _ _,;;;,; .. ::'. .. _.,:_,... .. >, • ,~::,. \ \/) ,\,,-\)' \ ,.,.-' ,".'..-.- ,--.._ .• ,-••i+-:Jn•- .. •• .. ._ ;.,.. , .,-,:;,,/~ ... --- ... ,,, , :;;;,.;,,--_;,.-;:,,,,- A>- \ .,,- ~---~ ~ ._.,, .,.,...,,,.~ ,,. \ _ .... + r,, .. ~" ,..,. i•• .f'·" ~- _i I .... •:..,>·;..,. _. :.,:: ,-. ;.~ .,.., \ /\ ~--·/\'\' , , f ,..-;.,,.,-· - \ ..-· / ~•• ·+ ,,..- .. •·•• --"' m_ / I er= :c:J,..:c;::c: .. :·:::-,; .. :_, .. : ;.:.:.:·;,ti::>::--~'\/ - \~~_) \ .. \;,- ....... \,✓ "\\ ,,;:..-:-_,✓;'\-~\ c\v-<- / " -- --- ~.-:: ·t .• ! 1::: :: ::·:+ ... ::.ti, :.·: 'C...- , .. ., , ,, .. "'\\ .,......... , , \ ,..,--/ '\ ,),.. \\ ~··-· + l"· ,. _..:I"' _.,. I ~-~-=~--::;·· ·: : ,,.:, .. :;:;\, .. i\..·/\ ,,' \'t;;,.....-__,, ..-< / ) \..;;,:-- ! 1'1:C-,:: :::J-;;.: {',: l , ~ .. ,... .., ,.., ,;,,., ,~ , 'v \ , ;::<<\ ' - - - ,.. (·..,.;;:;;"'"'--(' ,.... •. _j .. I"" ... -- ... J .,,,-,.. ~ I -r 1·1 C· .--:--w· .. _;,_>"',;=;:> .... 0;· ). , ~\~- ---.:---\ \~/\' \\ ,...\---~\ ,\:-\ .... Y_ ;/'/ c::-_= i. t,::: ::~.::: .. 11::: .• '::r:_~ L t"""?' ,, , ,~, \ ::::..-- _ .. ,, ,,:..,--,.,,-\ "./ -.r ~a-r• ..... , . ., ,., .. - -- I S"· ,. ,Y,.0-\ / \ \ --\- \ // \ .,Y,,,,P' -- _+-ITT'-'-" _ "'· '' :W ' \ ,., ,. ~ / _./4 _,../ {_ \ _.:',. ~al + :Utt •" 111< •·"-' U1 ' ~ ' V / /'\: ~i; / / ~ \ \ ~- ,,,_ + m >• c•• "·' m --1_ .,,\ \,,-/ \ ~ /'\ >-;:....-... _,,, ---.-,:~... =-=---}:::;:::: iii -}t~- ri --=, ..>-0~~ ,\~v <1/<~ , .... ~ ~ .. 1;1 ....... ,..,_ ... · ' / /: \ ' ', / ' > \.,// -~ + ,,, ••• .,. '" U\ /-\ \',: \ ·" / ' , --- \ . , 1/ ,....--- + 1 ......... ,.. ... '" /' \ \': ,..,,. \,/ / ./ _,. / .,· \,.../ .,, - .. - + llh Oft ,a,. 1.0·1 JOI ,l--/v\, .. ?\>' \0;;; \ .. \~)- \ ).✓J1/// , ,.... .. ~ + "' I ~ \ , I ~t'\~ ., '\ \ /\ /di ~- - - - ~ ,.._,,, .. \ / .,,. ............ "" - - - - - - -- -- r -":✓--::::, \ < " .. _ ,,- - 1 - 1- -- 1-- _ ~-- -- - -::::7- r::::~- I-~ .. ,~. ,, '( ,·c ... •-::;::,;-,-\ \ ,.. .. ,7 , j I • --•=- - • r" I \ - .. '\--::>-''\ V ,<, 1/ 0 A I~- \ \ \ - , \ ~ ,.- - r• -·-- - . -·--- ·•rn .. I .•. / /\.,...... .... .. #;-7 I O A1 I -- 111 / /, \ ,\ /4 /"' r .0'1 - •, I-•-•=- -- -,-G •=-' •rn " · Mo I I / /~ \.-,, -::<{_ ~• IQ i-- / .. I \,.Y,..Y D 6 =-"~-=ro~~~ j ,, ' _,•CA' S,QELCNSCSOPOncm:"" .!_.L__ ', )___ ~--"' .. /, - - - - \ · 1' / J- : I .,..,,..,...-f:;::::-,;:f· PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DISCLAIMER .,,-:;,,.,,-_.,.,,. ,C~1/ Rf5ULTSGENERATWIJ'l'lH1$100,.MfPROVID(OfQll .. f-T-~ONI.YWITHCIUTANY~ASTOAO.UIIACI' ~ ! / -~..,.....- COMl'I..ETENU$ ltfl""81UlYOIIO™EIIWSE.nEe,.1.CU1.ATEDIIESULTS""'YIEOl!l'OIOOIT0NUSEltPflOYIOEOCJ,O,T"OIIDIITAJtllOVID(OFll0N KY ~~iJ~~~~~•11~:i!ilE1:!~~=~iN";1~~o~~~~':J=i!~~~!~o - /,. .. OI.IS"l"""PAAC'Tic:E -T0Nt'TfllCCA1.CUl.ATIOH$PfR,OIIMEOIISll<OT-..ISTOOLAAfllASEDOl<IPHOT0NE'TlllCO...T"PIIO\IIOfOIIVfHE _,. WHJFACT\Jfl.U ""'" T'HfACCUAACYOf TI-<f CAI.CUI.A TED PHOTOME'Tll,C: P'tllfO-.el! IS DEl'ENOENT ON THE A1;QJUC,Of 11<( 0,,TA , / ...,. . .-.- F>ROV10f0,END-\.1$EltENV11\0NMENTANOAPJ>UeAT!ON(!NCW01NO,IIUTNOTlMITf0TO,VOl.TAOEV"RIATIOl'IMl0DIRT'iCCUMULATIOl'IIC'iN ~-~-· ==~R"'10TOOIIITRIC PERfORl,l.O.NCETO DIFFER FROMT)IE 1'£RfO~E C'ilCULATEOUSING THE 0,0,Tf,1'110\IIIJEO BVT)IE G GOUVIS lr.'1<1< u,·,:u~ '"""" lol "'l Q 7~~lt,I~ 1~~ •J.l~.7~~ ~J,1 ~:.1111 S!'"''l!l' 1d;.,.u1;,1,)() ~li I~ PRADO SITE LIGHTING DEVELOPER· AHV COMMUNITIES WR O€VCO .LLC 150 PALLAR INO ,SUI TE~ COSTA MESA. CA. 92626 LOCATION b;.MECUL.A NORTH REVISIONS ■ ~:w:~TOM ETRIC PROJECT NUMBER KEY PLAN 65763 SITE PHOTOMETR~~REA c 11 i E~-ra cc,.....,INEER DRAFTER -"'""'r"i:jj PA21-0838 Versal~ .c,- __ , __ ""'""_"'_ ~.~-•"lit'"' --· d.\ .. ,._ ... __ --· ·---0- 7 l~ a GOUVIS eJHll~!!,'!~l- A·,'·1 llt·1~ f l __ r~ ,,t,,I m ~ °'ti! ~-----~- ,,. __ --~= ~~ :;,!!1£ a~::~.! ~1 ... 1»,>,•..- ,:iw,to,i,o.- 1)Wl.l(o !MH,-,_ --- ,,,,.~ .... IIIWO,,J:'1- ~;i:=::: itm ,'!:i: = ~:ft~~~--=== r-'::=. __ : :::;::tm:::=== = PTW8-G Wall Mount Fixture {Solera ::;:~·:::::;;;~=.~·-:::;-oe- _ ....... IA~1:1 r~r-11 ~ ,s i ~[ I l C -•0 ",J lt::___lj Lg, Q ~ I! !":." ! I 1:::::-::::" ~ I I ~I L ·- ·_ .J r. r-'~ -- ,_j)_ .• ,,_ Ll ....... Solera _ ::;::-:---::::~:::;;::::·-:..'"::::...- ....... ~ ...... _., _ -~--~---~ E:::= c'::::J E:::::, E= E'J El E:J E,E::,.E::J = ,. :::- I . = ~ .... =:-.:- - .. :::::.-::- ------·----~----··- ........ 1,.,..., C:A'r.61R ln•111t L<:1 ~9.?S1.!1>\1 P3huSpr1,iw; iclJWJ2).S091.1 ~ PRADO SITE LIGHTING DEVElOPER AKI/ COMMUNITIES WR OEV CO . LLC 150 l'AULARINO. SUITE 0250 COSTAMESA,CA92626 ~ LOCATION· l:';_MECULA REVI SIONS ■ LIGHTING SPECIFICATION ~ 65763 llf-------- ENG INEER ORAneR SHEET~MBER- PA21-0838 LIGHTING SPECIFICATION E-1.7 TENTATIVE "TRACT MAP NO. 38121 arr OF TEMECULA, CA FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES ~~r.~ ~'::J~'~---110 ~.MD01scw.a.c4,01.1:0M . ~ ... ; ''",..,_,.,, (-)fJl-1101 '~===~ ff5,'l..,_,.XI ,.,,,,.._,_ ,_,, __ Tl)8(1'11Y.llll.YIIAillrNHCJJ9YHllllflMNOl'"$,lSSOCU- !tl Nl£0FOl:l'IIIQ.IOUS__.IYIH£u.-Gmc:o. f'fffM:CT.UDUHll1Hsrtm:w1i,oOTIH£ HOrrOTIDIClMArotl 0'"-'1'1!:Wfl/HUI 01'1'-M. 1t1 ll:C-N'fl1[UC'l'll1£ fRO"Q61;tl f!fB ffT' 0 :.=:.i---COUS"CIJCl,,IOfrrotl~IO«US/IWVAI!: © ~~txn1tar11rJ11CA natro1HCarTor11Waiurot1s111Ur- ·0 =:=-:v:~.::~=~=iro:i::::::w.A R(OQIIDClllY0r,os). 0 ~~C:.o/~~l,~rtlt!f-M. .. ru,m1111:rNGlfNfOf I,,.,._. .. , r'- I. ,. ~ : ~- , .. I ;)Ll.lit:::-,,..:.::::m.:::::~;::-:::il.~ ~ fEXIS7WQ PL&,& BTREET) ""-"-""'-' TYPfCAL. fflYA1E" ST1EET (tnlW'SJ,•OIIIOt.m'M\ol) """-""' I. l'!!PNY,HSIIIJIIPP!'"'l''!!Yi .. •I< -- -· ,':"'·tc----------'L--------=:a..!..- ~et:~ PlfO.CCTHO.ZO--l!U,,ROIWOl--10 r e 7)HCAL 'Pfl'VAIF 8TfEET fENTRY C#la,E8J YlCNTYMAP ot.lOfl.N" l'ffOf'.lOTIN" IJf. t' 1111,a a.•· •mr u.ir-•-- -- l'IIOl'OD SllllNI-HET l"IICl"lml)fl'tllli/-aLAl#<NT -- --~ l'WOll'OD.-..UQUNCllT -~~ _.,,a ,c:ru ~fWHllllWIT ()--- --v · . :r.• • i T NO, RCV/5/0NS OATC PA2HJ/l38 - TTM PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0838, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 237-UNIT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY BUILT ON 27.5 ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF EQUITY DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 16, 2021, AHV Communities filed two Planning Applications: No. PA21- 0838, a Development Plan and No. PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121). These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on April 20, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA21-0838, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 17.05.010.F (Development Plan): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a single family residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a single family residential community at the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and no further environmental review is required. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 237-unit single family residential community is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA21-0838, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 237-unit single family residential community located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of April, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of April, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA21-0838 A Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres located at the terminus of Equity Dr. on the west side of Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-400-051 916-400-052 916-400-053 916-400-063 916-400-066 916-400-067 N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) MSHCP Category: Residential (Detached) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) Single Family Residential (Detached Garage) April 20, 2022 April 20, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2002 026470 recorded on January 16, 2002 and Amendments. 7. Compliance with EIR. The Harveston Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2001 and first amended in 2003 and again in 2020 to allow for residential development on the project site. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified as part of this effort (EIR SCH No. 2019070974). The project and all subsequent projects within the site have been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 11. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 12. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. The pre construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the clearance survey, the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be resurveyed. 13. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 14. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. See the attached color/material schemes. 15. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 16. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 20. Fireplaces. Per the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program no residential units shall be constructed with fireplaces or hearths. 21. Fiscal Impact Analysis Compliance. The Project is required to address impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated May, 2022 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of Eight Four Dollars ($84.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen percent (17.0%) of the previous year ’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Tentative Tract Map No. 38121 for building permits for residential construction have been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. 22. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 23. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 24. Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 25. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 26. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 27. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 28. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and thei r designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 29. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 30. Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 31. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 14 day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 14 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 32. Sensitivity Training. Prior to any ground disturbing activities associated with the Project, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct cultural resources sensitivity training for all construction personnel. Construction personnel shall be informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered, and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The Applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain documentation demonstrating attendance. 33. Burrowing Owl Protocol Surveys. Prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, each project applicant shall conduct protocol BUOW surveys in accordance with the protocols established by CDFW in the CDEFW 2012 Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation to confirm the presence/absence of BUOW within the Project Site and the buffer area identified within the CDFW protocol. If the burrowing owl is present, protective measures, including active or passive relocation, shall be developed in consultation with CDFW to ensure compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and other applicable CDFW Code requirements and include, but are not limited to the following: • Occupied BUOW shall not be disturbed during nesting season unless a qualified biologist verifies through non invasive methods that either 1) the birds have not begun egg laying or incubation or 2) that juveniles from the occupied burrows are foraging independently and are capable of an independent survival flight. • A burrowing owl relocation plan shall be prepared that recommends methods needed to relocate the burrowing owls from the project site and provide measures that will be implemented for the maintenance, monitoring, and reporting of the relocated burrowing owls to increase chances of survivorship and better ensure compliance with CDFW guidelines. This plan shall be implemented during the non breeding season, and prior to seasonal rains to promote the best outcome for conservation of the burrowing owl. In addition to the above, each project applicant can choose to conduct additional BUOW surveys in advance of the prescribed pre construction survey(s) protocol established by CDFW in order to assess the presence/absence of BUOW on the project site. Surveys conducted earlier than the prescribed pre construction surveys per CDFW guidelines, would allow each project applicant to start early consultation with CDFW regarding BUOW relocation (assuming BUOW are present within the project site) well in advance of project construction activities. However, early surveys and consultation with CDFW does not eliminate the need to conduct a pre construction clearance survey in accordance with CDFW guidelines. The pre construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the clearance survey, the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be resurveyed. All protective measures, including relocation, shall be reviewed and approved by the CDFW prior to the initiating any ground disturbing activities. 34. Native Sediments. If grading activities are proposed within intact native sediments on the Project Site which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater, the qualified archaeologist shall monitor ground disturbing activities. If cultural resources are discovered, the qualified archaeologist shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified archaeologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the archaeologist, in consultation with the Applicant and the City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. 35. Previously Graded Sediments. If grading activities occur within previously graded sediments and inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered, the construction contractor shall suspend grading within 100 feet of the find until the qualified archaeologist evaluates the find and determines the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 36. Qualified Paleontologist. Prior to the start of earth moving activities, each project applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist defined as one meeting SVP standards (Society for Vertebrate Paleontology, 2010) to attend any pre grade construction meetings to determine when and where excavations extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site Working with each project applicant and the construction crew, the qualified paleontologist shall determine a paleontological monitoring schedule. The qualified paleontologist, or a paleontological monitor working under the direct supervision of the qualified paleontologist, shall monitor all ground disturbing activity that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site. The location, duration, and timing of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist designated for the Project in consultation with each project applicant and City and shall be based on a review of geologic maps and grading plans. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified paleontologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the paleontologist, in consultation with each project applicant and City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. Monitoring activities shall be documented in a Paleontological Resources Monitoring Report to be prepared by the qualified paleontologist at the completion of construction and shall be provided to the City of Temecula and filed with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County within six (6) months of grading completion for each individual project on the Project Site. 37. Paleontological Sensitivity Training. Prior to start of earth moving activities that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site, the qualified paleontologist shall conduct pre construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training. This training shall include information on what types of paleontological resources could be encountered during excavations, what to do in case an unanticipated discovery is made by a worker, and laws protecting paleontological resources. All construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils and instructed to immediately inform the construction foreman or supervisor if any bones or other potential fossils are unexpectedly unearthed in an area where a paleontological monitor is not present. 38. Discovery of Paleontological Resources. In the event of unanticipated discovery of paleontological resources when a paleontological monitor is not present, each construction contractor shall cease ground disturbing activities within 50 feet of the find until it can be assessed by the qualified paleontologist. The qualified paleontologist shall assess the find, implement recovery and reporting measures, if necessary, and determine if paleontological monitoring is warranted once work resumes. 39. MSHCP Pre Construction Survey. Within three days of the start of any ground disturbing activity during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to determine if there are active nests within the onsite trees and vegetation. If an active nest is not found, no biological monitor is required. If active nests are detected, a minimum buffer (e.g., 300 feet for songbirds or 500 feet for raptors) around the nest shall be delineated and flagged, and no construction activity shall occur within the buffer area until a qualified biologist determines the nesting species have fledged and is no longer active or the nest has failed. The buffer may be modified (i.e., increased or decreased) and/or other recommendations proposed (e.g., a temporary soundwall) as determined appropriate by the qualified biologist to minimize impacts. The qualified biologist shall monitor the removal of onsite trees and vegetation. Nest buffer distance will be based on species, specific location of the nest, the intensity of construction activities, existing disturbances unrelated to the project and other factors. 40. Inadvertent Discoveries and Subsurface Cultural Resources. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered either within the intact native sediments or previously graded sediments, grading activities shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find and the Project Applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. • Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. • If preservation in place is not feasible, the Project Applicant and Pechanga Tribe shall discuss reburial of the resources on the Project property, in perpetuity. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. • If the Project Applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director will make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and will take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director will be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City of Temecula City Council. • Any newly discovered cultural resources shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation pursuant to state law prior to restarting grading within 100 feet of the discovered resources. The cultural resources evaluation of the newly discovered cultural resources shall be detailed in a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan (“Plan”). Furthermore, after ground disturbing activities are completed, the archeologist shall prepare a monitoring report (consistent with the County of Riverside Phase IV monitoring report requirements) and submit the monitoring report to the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 41. Archaeologist Retained. Prior to issuance of a grading permit and prior to the start of any ground disturbing activity, the applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archeologist meeting the Secretary of the Interior ’s Professional Qualification Standards for archeology (U.S. Department of Interior 2012) and as approved by the City of Temecula, to provide archaeological expertise in carrying out all mitigation measures related to archeological resources. 42. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 43. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment o f these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF. 44. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 45. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Four (4) copies of Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 46. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue . Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 47. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 48. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 49. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 50. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 51. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 52. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. 53. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: • Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger and side and rear yards where designated on the Wall and Fence Plan. • Tubular steel fencing around the pool area. • Vinyl fencing shall be used for all side and rear yard fencing when not restricted/conditioned outlined above and shown on the Wall and Fence Plan. • Tubular steel surrounding the water quality basins and the western and northern project boundary where shown on the Wall and Fence Plan. 54. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 55. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 56. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped (which may include a requirement for regular irrigation) for dust and soil erosion control. 57. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 58. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 59. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 60. Community Wide Public Benefit. The applicant shall provide a cash payment in the amount of $665,000.00 to the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the first residential building permit. This payment will fulfill the requirements of the Growth Management Plan for the proposed project. 61. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 62. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 63. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 64. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 65. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 66. Front Yard and Slope Landscaping. Front yard and slope landscaping for each residence shall be completed for inspection. 67. Private Common Area Landscaping. Private common area landscaping shall be completed. 68. HOA Landscaping. HOA landscaping shall be completed for inspection for those lots adjacent to HOA landscaped area. 69. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 3.70 acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 9.48% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 70. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated July 15, 2021, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date b y the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 71. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated April 15, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 72. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District’s transmittal dated June 9, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 73. Geotechnical Compliance. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geocon West transmittal dated November 22, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 74. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 75. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 76. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 77. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 78. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right-of-way; and c. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 79. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public/private street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 80. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 81. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. 82. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 83. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following vehicular movements restrictions: a. The future access onto Ynez Road shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out/left-in movement. 84. Landscaped Median Modification. The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards b. shall set a pre-construction meeting with the appropriate parties including Public Works and Building & Safety, prior to start of work. The developer shall comply with the Public Works’ review and inspection process c. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped median until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility 85. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 86. Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the Project's Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, and/or (iv) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of the Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, then d. Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 87. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 88. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. 89. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 90. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 91. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 92. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 93. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 94. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 95. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 96. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 97. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 98. Ingress/Egress Easement. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over adjacent properties. The easement information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 99. Driveways. All units shall be provided with zero clearance garage doors and garage door openers if the driveway is less than 18’ in depth from back of sidewalk. 100. Gate Entrances. If gates are being proposed at project entrances, the configuration, stacking distance and turn-around ability shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works and the Fire Department. 101. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 102. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 103. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 104. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 105. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 106. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 107. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 108. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map No. 38121 shall be approved and recorded. 109. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans (and the construction plans for landscaped medians) shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Equity Drive (Private Street – 60’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. b. Streets A, B, C and D (Private Street - 60' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. c. Streets C and D at the Entry Circles (Private Street - 86' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. d. Alleys A through EE (Private - 24' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. f. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). g. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 110. Traffic Signal Modification. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall obtain approval of the traffic signal modification design plans for the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The traffic signal modification plans shall include designs for fiber optic communications on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Equity Drive, traffic signal fiber communication equipment, CCTV, and other necessary traffic signal modifications needed for the entry driveway connection at Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the City of Temecula’s Traffic Signal Standards and Guidelines. 111. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 112. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 113. Traffic Signal Modification. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the traffic signal modification at the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive shall be operational. 114. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 115. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 116. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 117. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 118. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mecha nical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 119. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 120. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 121. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 122. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 123. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 124. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 125. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 126. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 127. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 128. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 129. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 130. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 131. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. Since this is a combo system and the domestic lines are being fed from the fire line, you will be required to subtract out the average daily use of the homes an add that in to the fire flow calculations when calculating the system. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 132. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. This includes no obstructions from parking or waste bins can encroach this 24-feet of clear width. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 133. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 134. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 135. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Te mecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 136. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 137. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Residential fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau for each single family dwelling home, not model type. each home will have its own permit for the fire sprinklers and will require its own set of approved plans. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 138. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. Hydraulic calculations will need to include the average daily use of the homes since this is a combo system. Fire flow letter from water district will need to be within 6 months old. (domestic lines coming off of the fire line). The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 139. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Only the rec center would require an alarm system. 140. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 141. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 142. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have 4-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 143. Site Plan. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5) 144. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable 145. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 146. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 147. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 148. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 149. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 150. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 151. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 152. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 153. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 154. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 155. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that, “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 156. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 157. J A S O N E . U H L E Y G e n e r a l M a n a g e r -C h ie f E n g in e e r 19 9 5 M A R K E T S T R E E T R IV E R S JD E , C A 92 5 0 I 9 5 1.9 5 5 .1 2 0 0 9 5 1.7 8 8 .9 9 6 5 F A X www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 239131 July 15, 2021 City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 Attention: Scott Cooper Re: PA 21-0838 and TTM 38121 APN 916-400-066 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees ( development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received June 21, 2021. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: 0 This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. □ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. □ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (□Murrieta Valley D Temecula Valley IZI Santa Gertrudis Valley □Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for C ity o f T e m e c u la R e : P A 2 1 -0 8 3 8 a n d T T M 3 8 1 2 1 A P N 9 1 6 -4 0 0 -0 6 6 - 2 - July 15, 2021 239131 which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. □ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely,_________ For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. □ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLO MR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy SLJ:blm April 15, 2021 AHV Communities 150 Paularino Avenue, Suite D250 Costa M esa, CA 92626 Subject: SAN 53 - Will Serve - WS 20210000399 - APN: 916-400-051, 052, 053, 063, 066, 067 Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) is willing to provide sewer services to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to provide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610 . EM W D expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Furt her arrangem ents fo r service fr om EM W D m ay also incl ude plan check, fa cility construct ion, inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and paym ent of financial partici pation charges. The developer is advised to contact EM W D's D evelopm ent Services Departm ent early in the entitlem ent process to determ ine the necessary arrangem ents fo r service, and to receive direction on the preparation of fa ci lity D esign Conditions, w hic h is required prior to final engineering. EM W D's abili ty to serve is subject to lim iting conditions, such as regulatory requirem ents, legal issues, or conditions beyond EM W D's contro l. Expiration - one year from date of issue Thank you fo r your cooperation in serving our m utual custom ers. If you have any questions, please call m e at (951) 928-377 7, extension 4467. Sincerely, ~o,/4~ Brian A. Raines, M PA , PE A ssociate Civil Engineer II D evelopm ent Services D epart m ent Eastern M unicipal W ater D istrict BAR :bd Board of D irectors Ph,lip E. Paule. V,ce Pres,d,111 Jeff A rm strong Stephen J. C orona R andy A. R ecord D avid J. Slaw ,o n 2270 Trumble Road • P.O. Box 830 0 • Perris, CA 92572 -830 0 T 951.92S .3n 7 • F 951.928.61n www.emwd.org EMWD HydroMapper N w♦, s R1vers1de \,_ P...., a Ckr lt'OF~- ,al.j , Perns He111~1 ·- ... ,' -~- "4 \ 1-½illl0s1Dn <;ommumty PaJi.. Legend \M r Main As Built C!P \M r Main Abandoned O Swr lnteragency Tie Swr Main As Built. Collect!on As Bui lt, Dlstrtbu ~on As Built, Efflue nt Force As Built, Infl uen t Force As Bu ilt, Tran smi ssion CIP, Collecti on CIP, Effluen t For ce CIP, Influe nt Force CIP, Tra nsm ission Swr Main Abandoned Swr Main Murrieta Streets \M r Pump Station \M r Pump Station Polygon • \M rTank • IM rWell \M r Treatment Plant \M r Treatm ent Plant Polygc • MWO Connections Notes SCALE 1: 7,505 1,876 Feet 0 Map Produced 04/15/2021 By EMWD Staff ©EM\11/D GIS data shown is for informational purpo ses only, is subject to change without notice and may not be suitable for legal, engineering, constructio n, or surveying purposes. Information should be review ed against reliable sou rces to ascertain its usability. Eastern Municipal Water District assumes no liability for any incorrect results, any lost profits and direct, spec ial, indirect or consequential damages to any party, arising out of or in connection with the use or the inability to use the data hereon or the services. P O B ox 8300, P erris C A 92572 -8300 (951) 928-377 7 RECEIPT OF PAYMENT Contact: Date Paid: Project Info: Received By: Fees Paid: AHV COMMUNITIES - MARK ROSENE 150 PAULARINO A VENUE SUITE D250, COSTA MESA, CA 92626 04/15/2021 PRADO -APN 916-400-051, 052, 053, 063, 066, 067 dumasb !DeseripCiion 1Reference Amount Amount :N,umbers • Owin2. l' Paid WILL SERVE LETTER REQUEST (RESIDENTIAL) WS20210000399 $77.00 $77.00 Amount Tendered: Change/Overage: $77.00 $0.00 Payment Details: Receipt Number: Payment Method CHECK Amount Tendered Check Number $77.00 3211 2021005092 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * :c *.,.. *- * ~ : UJ * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * C) 0 N CD - C) C) C) I C) I 0 ~ C) •• 8~ C"'l ::::, I Cl ~:::E: ~<C \.0 LJ..J NLJ..J OLL c:, ~ C"'l ~ f- Ll (._) <C O* CJ* ·* N* CO* * iB-* * * * * * * ra *+-> * <ti !a *+-> ~ C * Q) *E * >- * <CJ *a.. * * _.J * <C* f- * Cl* f- * ➔f- f- * O..* ....... * LJ..J * Ll * LJ..J* a::: * c:, c:, Ll _.J N _J(X) -- en LJ..J a::: :::> f- = LJ..J >- C.!:I = ,..... en ::::J Cl ::c = <C CJ 1-i a::: LJ..J N ::E:::X:.C"l ~<eu 0 L- Cl #W ::C # +-' >- f- 4- E l'O LJ..J W I c.. a.. :::E: a::: @ Rancho later June 9, 2021 Board of Directors Carol Lee Gonzales-Brady President John V. Rossi Senior Vice President Brian J. Brady Angel Garcia John E. Hoagland William E. Plummer Bill Wilson Officers Robert S. Grantham General Manager Eva Plajzer, P.E. Assistant General Manager Engineering and Operations Richard R. Aragon, CPFO Assistant General Manager CFO/Treasurer Jason A. Martin Director of Administration Eileen Dienzo Director of Human Resources Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary James B. GIipin Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Case Planner City of Temecula Planning Department 410 00 Main Street Post Office Box 9033 Temecula, CA 92589-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY PARCEL NOS.13 THROUGH 17 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36336 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 38121 APN NOS. 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-067, AND 916-400-068 [AHV COMMUNITIES] Dear Case Planner: Please be advised that the above-referenced project/property is located within the service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (Rancho Water/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 20-inch diameter water pipeline (13 05 Pressure Zone) and an existing 20-inch diameter recycled water pipeline (1381 Pressure Zone) within Ynez Road. Please refer to the enclosed exhibit map. Water service to the subject project/property does not exist. Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property owner. Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water services/meters for domestic service, fire service, and landscape irrigation service, as applicable. Beginning in 2018, newly constructed multi-unit residential structures are required to measure the quantity of water supplied to each individual residential dwelling unit. Where private on-site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such 'common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association, Rancho Water requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants, codes, and restrictions. 21 \KC:rm052\F450\FEG Ra n cho Calif o rn ia W ater D istrict 42 13 5 W in chester Road • Post Offi ce Box 9017 • Tem ecula, Californ ia 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296 6860 • w w w .ranchow ater.com Case Planner/City of Tem ecula June 9, 2021 Page Two Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on-site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to Rancho Water. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to Rancho Water's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. In accordance w ith Resolution 2007-10-5 and subject to a Notice of Determination by Rancho Water, the project/property may be required to use recycled water for all landscape irrigation, which should be noted as a condition for any subsequent development plans. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from Rancho W ater. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA ) docum ents, the pro ject proponent should contact Rancho W ater fo r a determ ination of existing w ater system capability, based upon pro ject-specific dem ands and/or fire flow requirem ents, as well as a determ ination of pro posed w ater fa ci lities co nfiguration. If new fa cili ties are required fo r servic e, fire pro tection, or other purposes, the pro ject proponent should contact Rancho W ater fo r an assessm ent of project-specific fees and requirem ents. Sew er service to the subject pro ject/propert y, if available, w ould be pro vided by Eastern M unicipal W ater D istrict. If no sew er service is currently available to the subject pro ject/property, all proposed w aste discharge system s m ust com ply w ith the State W ater Resources Control Board, health departm ent, and/or other requirem ents as they relate to the pro tection of groundw ater quality, pursuant to Rancho W ater's G roundw ater Protection Policy. If you should have any questions or need additional info rm ation, please contact an Engineering Technici an at the D istrict office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT L/!.&uiWJ_f Krism a Cro w ell Senior Engineering Technici an Enclosure: Exhibit Map cc: Jeff Kirshberg, Water Resources Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor 21 \KC:rm052\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www.ranchowater com GEOCON W E S T, I N C. GEOTECHNI 0 Project No. T2652-22-17 November 22, 2021 Leighton and Associates, Inc. 41715 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 103 Temecula, California 92590-5661 Attention: Mr. Simon Saiid, GE Subject: FINAL GEOTECHNICAL THIRD-PARTY REVIEW (PA21-0838) PROPOSED MUL TI-FAMILY HOUSING PARCELS 13-17 OF PM 36336 TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA References: 1) Addendum Report #2 - Response to 2nd Peer Review Comments Prado - Portion of Parcel Map 36336 - Parcels 13-17, Winchester Hills, City of Temecula, California, prepared by Leighton & Associates, Inc., Project No. 12674.001, dated November 15, 2021. 2) 2nd Geotechnical Third-Party Review (PA21-0838) Proposed Multi-Family Housing, Parcels 13-17 of PM 36336, Temecula, California, prepared by Geocon Wes, Inc., Project T2652-22-17, dated November 11, 2021. 3) Addendum Report #1 - Response to Peer Review Comments, Prado - Portion of Parcel Map 36336 - Parcels 13-17, Winchester Hills, City of Temecula, California, prepared by Leighton & Associates, Inc., Project 12674.001, dated September 30, 2021. 4) Geotechnical Third-Party Review (PA21-0838), Proposed Multi-family Housing, Parcels 117 of PM 36336, Temecula, California, Project T2652-22-17 dated September 16, 2021. 5) Geologic/Geotechnical Exploration Report, Portion of Parcel Map 36336 - Parcels 13-17, Winchester Hills, Temecula, California, prepared by Leighton & Associates, Inc., Project 12674.00 I, dated April 30, 2020. Dear Mr. Saiid: In accordance with the request of Mr. Scott Cooper with the City of Temecula, Geocon West, Inc. (Geocon) has completed a third-party review of the Geologic/Geotechnical Exploration Report (Reference 5) and the subsequent Addendum Reports #I (Reference 3) and #2 (Reference 1) which provide responses to Geocon' speer review comments (References 2 and 4). The purpose of this review is to receive and consider responses to our initial geotechnical comments and request additional information to clarify outstanding geotechnical questions. Geocon's review is based on the County of Riverside Technical Guidelines for the Review of Geotechnical and Geologic Reports 2000 Edition, California Geological Survey Special Publication 117A, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating 41571 Corning Place, Suite 101 ■ Murrieta, California 92562-7065 ■ Telephone 951.304.2300 ■ Fax 951.304.2392 Seismic Hazards in California dated 2008, California Geological Survey Guidelines for Evaluating the Hazard of Surface Fault Rupture, Note 49 dated 2002, ASCE 7-16, 2019 California Building Code, and City of Temecula Improvement Standard Drawings. CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the referenced documents, the geotechnical aspects the reports adequately address the project design as presented. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, LAB:JTA:JV:hd Distribution: (1 pdf) City of Temecula Planning Department, Attn: Scott Cooper Geocon Project No. T2652-22- I 7 - 2 - November 22, 2021 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0839, A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP (TTM 38121) FOR CONDOMINIUM PURPOSES FOR THE CREATION OF ONE (1) RESIDENTIAL LOT, TWO (2) OPEN SPACE LOTS, AND ONE (1) 2.95 ACRE LOT FOR STREET AND HIGHWAY DEDICATION LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF EQUITY DRIVE ON THE WEST SIDE OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400- 053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On June 16, 2021, AHV Communities filed two Planning Applications: No. PA21- 0838, a Development Plan and No. PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121). These applications (collectively “Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on April 20, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA21-0839, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. The maximum number of residential units allowed within the Residential Overlay of the Harveston Specific Plan is 1,000. The proposed project proposes the creation of (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. As such, the total number of residential units proposed as part of this project and previously approved within the Residential Overlay are below what is allowed per the Specific Plan. Furthermore, the proposed Tentative Map is consistent with the design requirements of the Harveston Specific Plan. Therefore, the proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, the City of Temecula Municipal Code, and the Harveston Specific Plan. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land, which is the subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The proposed property has not been used as agricultural land and has never been subject to any Williamson Act contracts. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the previously approved Residential Overlay within the Harveston Specific Plan which allows for 1,000 residential units. Specifically, Planning Area 12 allows for a maximum of 1,000 residential units. The Tentative Map for Condominium Purposes will allow for the development of single family homes that results in under 1,000 total residential units as part of this project and previously approved within Planning Area 12. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval, are either: 1. Not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, or 2. An environmental impact report has been prepared and a finding has been made, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3), finding that specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the environmental impact report. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone (EIR No. SCH# 2019070974). The SEIR identified seven (7) areas where no impacts were discovered. These areas are: Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Mineral Resources, and Wildfire. The analysis identified seven (7) areas where impacts were not considered to be significant. These areas include: Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Climate Change, Land Use and Planning, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, and Utilities and Service Systems. The SEIR recommended feasible mitigation measures for environmental impacts that can be mitigated to a less than significant impact in the following areas: Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Noise, Transportation, and Tribal Cultural Resources. A Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program was adopted in connection with the SEIR. Consequently, the Tentative Map, which implements the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan, is not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, based on the analysis in the SEIR. In addition, while the SEIR identified Air Quality as creating significant and unavoidable impacts, in accordance with Section 15093 of the State CEQA Guidelines, a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted stating that the significant adverse project effects are acceptable because the expected project benefits outweigh unavoidable adverse environmental impacts. In addition, the City Council adopted Findings of Facts in Support of Findings that identify that, with respect to Air Quality, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the Final SEIR. The Findings of Fact in Support of Findings are incorporated herein as if set forth in full. Because the Tentative Map implements the Harveston Specific Plan as amended, these same considerations and findings apply here. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities. The project has been designed to ensure that all setbacks have been met and that light and air access is available to the extent possible. In addition, the construction will be required to conform to all state energy efficiency codes as well. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision was designed, and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Tentative Map: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a tentative tract map for one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of April, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of April, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA21-0839 A Tentative Tract Map (No. 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication located at the terminus of Equity Dr. on the west side of Ynez Road Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-400-051 916-400-052 916-400-053 916-400-063 916-400-066 916-400-067 N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) MSHCP Category: Residential (Detached) DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: N/A (Exempt per Development Agreement Section 4.2.1) Single-Family with Attached Garage April 20, 2022 April 20, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 1. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the ori ginal approval date of a development plan. 2. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13). 4. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2002 026470 recorded on January 16, 2002 and Amendments. 5. Compliance with EIR. The Harveston Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2001 and amended in 2020 to allow for residential development on the project site. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified as part of this effort (EIR SCH No. 2019070974). The project and all subsequent projects within the site have been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. 6. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 7. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer ’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 8. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 9. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 10. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. b. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. SCH# 2019070974 was prepared for this project and is on file at the City of Temecula Planning Division. 11. Submittal of CC&Rs. A copy of the Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) shall be submitted and approved by the Director of Community Development. The CC&Rs shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, exterior of all buildings, and all landscaped and open areas, including parkways. Applicants shall provide a deposit in the amount of $3,750 for the review of new CC&Rs. Amended CC&Rs will require a deposit of $2,000. The applicant shall be responsible for all costs incurred during the review of the CC&Rs and additional fees may be required during the course of the review. 12. Form and Content of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be in the form and content approved by the Director of Community Development, City Engineer, and the City Attorney, and shall include such provisions as are required by this approval and as said officials deem necessary to protect the interests of the City and its residents. 13. Preparation of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be prepared at the developer ’s sole cost and expense. 14. Review of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs and Articles of Incorporation of the Property Owners Association are subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development, Public Works Director, and the City Attorney. 15. CC&Rs and Management/Maintenance of Common Areas. The CC&Rs shall provide for the effective establishment, operation, management, use, repair, and maintenance of all common areas, drainage facilities, and pollution prevention devices outlined in the project’s Water Quality Management Plan. 16. CC&Rs and Public Nuisance. The CC&Rs shall provide that the property shall be developed, operated, and maintained so as not to create a public nuisance. 17. Termination of CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall provide that the association may not be terminated without prior City approval. 18. CC&Rs and Maintenance of Property. The CC&Rs shall provide that if the property is not maintained in the condition required by the CC&Rs, then the City, after making due demand and giving reasonable notice, may enter the property and perform, at the owner ’s sole expense, any maintenance required thereon by the CC&Rs or the Temecula Municipal Code. The property shall be subject to a lien in favor of the City to secure any such expense not promptly reimbursed. 19. Interest in Association. Every owner of a suite or lot governed by CC&Rs shall own as an appurtenance to such suite or lot, either: (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an association owning the common areas and facilities. 20. Maintenance of Open Areas. All open areas and landscaping governed by CC&R shall be permanently maintained by the association or other means acceptable to the City. Such proof of this maintenance shall be submitted to the Planning Divisions and Public Works Department prior to the issuance of building permits. 21. Reciprocal Easements. Reciprocal access easements and maintenance agreements ensuring access to all parcels and joint maintenance of all roads, drives, parking areas, drainage facilities, and water quality features, shall be provided by the CC&Rs or by deeds and shall be recorded concurrent with the map or prior to the issuance of building permit where no map is involved. 22. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs, following the Declarant’s signature, to read as follows: CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA The Conditions of Approval for Tentative Tract Map No. 38121 require the City of Temecula to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. The City’s review of these CC&Rs has been limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessments, enforcement of assessments, resolutions of disputes or procedural matters. Subject to the limitations set forth herein, the City consents to the CC&Rs. _____________________ Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Approved as to Form: _____________________ Peter M. Thorson City Attorney 23. Consent of City of Temecula. An Article must be added to every set of CC&Rs to read as follows: Article ___ CONSENT OF CITY OF TEMECULA ____1. The Conditions of Approval of Tentative Tract Map Number 38121 requires the City to review and approve the CC&Rs for the Parcel. ____2. Declarant acknowledges that the City has reviewed these CC&Rs and that its review is limited to a determination of whether the proposed CC&Rs properly implement the requirements of the Conditions of Approval for the Parcel. The City’s consent to these CC&Rs does not contain or imply any approval of the appropriateness or legality of the other provisions of the CC&Rs, including, without limitation, the use restrictions, private easements and encroachments, private maintenance requirements, architecture and landscape controls, assessment procedures, assessment enforcement, resolution of disputes or procedural matters. ____3. In the event of a conflict between the Conditions of Approval of the land use entitlements issued by the City for the Parcel or Federal, State, or local laws, ordinances, and regulations and these CC&Rs, the provisions of the Conditions of Approval and Fede ral, State or local laws, ordinances, and regulations shall prevail, notwithstanding the language of the CC&Rs. ____4. These CC&Rs shall not be terminated, amended or otherwise modified without the express written consent of the Director Community Development of the City of Temecula. 24. Operation of Association. No lot or suite in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owners group or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC&Rs, which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or suites and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC&Rs shall permit enforcement by the City for provisions required as Conditions of Approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the City prior to maki ng any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. 25. Recordation of CC&Rs. CC&Rs shall be finalized and recorded at the time of Final Map Recordation. 26. Copies of CC&Rs. Three copies of the final recorded CC&Rs shall be provided to the Planning Division. 27. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 28. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 29. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right-of-way; and c. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 30. PW-005: Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit improvement plans (to include public/private street plans, storm drain plans, traffic signal plans, signage and striping plans, etc.) as required for review and approval by Public Works. The designs shall be in compliance with Caltrans, Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and City codes/standards. 31. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 32. Landscaped Plans (for Ynez Road median modification). The developer: a. shall contact the Park/Landscape Maintenance Supervisor for a pre-design meeting to discuss design parameters. The design shall be in conformance with the Temecula Community Services District’s Landscape Standards. b. his successor or assignee, shall be responsible for the maintenance of the landscaped median until such time Public Works accepts that responsibility. 33. Access restriction. The future access onto Ynez Road shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out/left-in movement. 34. Underlying Approvals. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the Project's Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, and/or (iv) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c Third priority goes to the provisions of the Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, then d. Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 35. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 36. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have approved improvement plans, executed subdivision improvement agreements and posted securities. 37. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 38. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 39. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; b. Rancho California Water District; c. Eastern Municipal Water District; d. or other affected agencies 40. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Ynez Road on the Final Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 41. Easements. Note the following: a. An easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Private easements for cross-lot drainage shall be delineated and noted on the Tract Map. c. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 42. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval prior to issuance of any permit. 43. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. The developer shall provide an Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for future Interstate 15 Northbound off ramp, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 44. Public Street Improvements and Securities. The developer shall design and guarantee construction (i.e., posting of security and entering into agreements) of the following public improvements (including parkways and medians) to the City’s General Plan standards unless otherwise noted. Plans shall be approved by Public Works. a. Improve Ynez Road (Major Arterial (4 lanes divided) Standard No. 101 – 110’ R/W) to include installation of sidewalk, drainage facilities, signing and striping, utilities (inclu ding but not limited to water and sewer), and raised landscaped median modification. 45. Traffic Signal Modification. The developer shall design and guarantee installation of traffic signal modifications for the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The traffic signal modifications shall include designs for fiber optic communications on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Equity Drive, traffic signal fiber communication equipment, CCTV, and other necessary traffic signal modifications needed for the entry driveway connection at Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the City of Temecula’s Traffic Signal Standards and Guidelines. 46. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 47. Private Streets. Private roads shall be designed to meet City public road standards. Unless otherwise approved, the following minimum criteria shall be observed in the design of private streets: a. Improve Equity Drive (Private Street – 60’ R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. b. Improve Streets A, B, C and D (Private Street - 60' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. c. Improve Streets C and D at the Entry Circles (Private Street - 86' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements, including utilities, as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. d. Improve Alleys A through EE (Private - 24' R/E) to include installation of full-width street improvements as shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map. e. Cul-de-sac geometries shall meet current City standards. f. Minimum safe horizontal centerline radii shall be required (all centerline radii should be identified on the site plan). g. All intersections shall be perpendicular to 90 degrees. 48. Undergrounding Utility Systems. All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable TV shall be provided underground (with the required easements); and shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City codes and utility provider ’s standards. Telephone, cable TV and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residence. The developer shall notify the City’s cable TV franchisees of the Intent to Develop. Conduit shall be installed to cable TV standards at time of street improvements. 49. Assessments. Pursuant to Section 66493 of the Subdivision Map Act, any subdivision, which is part of an existing Assessment District, must comply with the requirements of said section. The developer shall submit an application for reapportionment of any assessments with the appropriate regulatory agency. 50. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 51. Parcel Geometry. The applicant shall submit an editable projected digital version of the parcel geometry in a drawing exchange format (pursuant to Riverside County standards). Prior to final approval, the City’s GIS Division shall conduct quality control on the data to verify accuracy and compatibility. 52. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District; b. or other affected agencies. 53. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and al l construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 54. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 55. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 56. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 57. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 58. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 59. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site ’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 60. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 61. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 62. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 63. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Tract Map Number 38121 shall be approved and recorded. 64. Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private streetlights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public streetlights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 65. Precise Grading Plan. A precise grading plan shall be submitted to Public Works for review and approval. The plan shall be in substantial conformance with the approved rough grading plan; and shall show all lot drainage directed to the driveway by side yard drainage swales independent of any other lot. The building pad shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 66. Landscaped Median Modification. The landscaped median modification shall be completed to the satisfaction of Public Works prior to issuance of the building permit(s). 67. Traffic Signal Modification. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall obtain approval of the traffic signal modification design plans for the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The traffic signal modification plans shall include designs for fiber optic communications on Ynez Road from Winchester Road to Equity Drive, traffic signal fiber communication equipment, CCTV, and other necessary traffic signal modifications needed for the entry driveway connection at Ynez Road and Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the City of Temecula’s Traffic Signal Standards and Guidelines. 68. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Traffic Signal Modification. Prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, the traffic signal modification at the intersection of Ynez Road and Equity Drive shall be operational. 69. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 70. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 71. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 72. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 73. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,400 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings. The average daily use for the dwelling units will need to be included in the fire flow since this is a combo system and the domestic water lines are coming off of the fire line. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 74. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 75. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 76. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 77. Water Maintenance Agreement. An agreement for the maintenance and repair of any and all existing underground Fire Department water systems, including all fire sprinkler supplies, and all fire hydrants and supplies, will be in place as a condition of this division to maintain available water in perpetuity 78. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 79. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed clear width of not less than 24 feet for residential tract developments, with an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches. Parking and waste disposal bins cannot obstruct the 24-feet of clear unobstructed width for fire access. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 80. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 81. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Knox Box. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5) 82. File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electroni c file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable 83. 555 W. Beech Street, Suite 460  San Diego, California 92101  PHONE: 619 718 9500  FAX: 619 718 9508 22008kal www.keysermarston.com 19454.052.001 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BERKELEY A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY DEBBIE M. KERN DAVID DOEZEMA KEVIN FEENEY LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RABE GREGORY D. SOO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY TIM BRETZ SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA MEMORANDUM To: Scott Cooper, Associate Planner II City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Objective In accordance with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.’s (KMA’s) agreement for consulting services with the City of Temecula (City), KMA has undertaken a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for the Prado project (Project) proposed by AHV Communities (Developer). The Project will be located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and Equity Drive (Site) within the Harveston Specific Plan Residential Overlay. The Project is planned to include 237 detached single-family residential rental units. This FIA prepared by KMA evaluates the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the proposed Project over a 20-year period. The 20-year period begins at the completion and occupancy of the Project’s first residential units, which is assumed to be Fiscal Year (FY) 2024, and ends in FY 2043. B. Methodology In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: • Reviewed background materials and planning/zoning documents relevant to the Project and the Site. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 2 22008kal 19454.052.001 • Reviewed the City’s FY 2022 General Fund Operating Budget to understand the City’s fiscal condition and revenue/expenditure parameters. • Interviewed key City staff regarding cost-of-service structure and approach to provide services to the Project. • Collected and reviewed demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. • Collected and reviewed residential market data to substantiate inputs provided by the Developer. • Estimated recurring annual revenues and municipal service expenditures as a result of the Project. C. Report Organization Following this introduction: • Section II presents a summary of the KMA key findings. • Section III provides a projection of the fiscal impact of the Project on the City’s General Fund over the 20-year period. • Finally, Section IV presents limiting conditions pertaining to this report. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Project – 20-Year Fiscal Impact • The Project is estimated to yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund each year after stabilization. • The major revenue categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include property tax, property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fee (VLF), indirect (off-site) sales tax, Measure S revenues, and franchise fees. • The major expenditure categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include Police, Fire, Public Works, Asset Management, and General Government. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 3 22008kal 19454.052.001 • The Project’s fiscal impact is estimated at negative $20,000, or negative $84 per unit, in stabilized Year 2 (FY 2025 dollars) and is projected to reach negative $338,000, or negative $1,426 per unit, in Year 20 (FY 2043 dollars), as shown in Table II-1 below. Table II-1: Fiscal Impact of Project FY 2025 FY 2043 General Fund Revenues $471,000 $718,000 General Fund Expenditures ($491,000) ($1,056,000) Annual Net Fiscal Impact to City Deficit per Unit per Year Revenue to Expense Ratio ($20,000) ($84) 0.96 ($338,000) ($1,426) 0.68 III. 20-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT A. Overview of Methodology This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed Project. The detailed KMA 20-year fiscal impact model is provided in Appendices A and B of this report and summarized below. Demographic and Economic Overview Table III-1 presents the findings of the KMA review of demographic and economic factors for the City. The data consist of population, number of housing units, and total jobs. More detail is presented in Appendix A, Table A-1. Table III-1: Demographic and Economic Overview, City of Temecula (1) 2021 Estimate Population 112,771 Housing Units 36,651 Jobs (2) 54,313 (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021. (2) Source: US Census Bureau OnTheMap – Total All Jobs, Employment by Place of Work. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 4 22008kal 19454.052.001 Overview of City General Fund Budget Table III-2 below provides an overview of the City’s FY 2022 Revised General Fund budget. A more detailed analysis can be found in Appendix A, Table A-2. As shown, the City was operating at a net surplus of $5.7 million in FY 2022. Appendix A, Tables A-3 and A-4 also show the department revenues and expenditures used to calculate the per capita impacts to the General Fund from the development of the proposed Project. The revenues shown are strictly departmental revenues and exclude such revenues as property and sales tax, which are estimated based on projected increases in assessed value and taxable sales as a result of development of the Project, respectively. The expenditures used in this analysis reflect a deduction for citizen/user payments in the form of Charges for Services to yield net (unreimbursed) expenditures. B. Key Assumptions – Project As shown in Table III-3 below, the Project will include 237 detached single-family residential units with an average unit size of 1,551 square feet (SF). A more detailed description of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-2. Table III-3: Project Description Unit Size Units Plan 1 Plan 2 Plan 3 Plan 4 1,410 SF 1,520 SF 1,647 SF 1,858 SF 56 112 46 23 Units Units Units Units Total/Average 1,551 SF 237 Units Table III-4 below presents the assumed absorption schedule for the Project. The Developer anticipates that first occupancy will occur during FY 2024 until stabilized occupancy is achieved by FY 2025. A more detailed analysis of the projected annual absorption of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B- 3. Table III-2: City of Temecula, Mid-Year FY 2022 Revised General Fund Budget General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Net Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio $87,358,000 ($81,682,000) $5,676,000 1.07 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 5 22008kal 19454.052.001 C. Key Assumptions to Fiscal Impact Projection General Approach Assumptions used in the FIA are based on an assessment of future circumstances regarding population, employment, property valuation, and taxable sales. Table III-5 below provides a summary of the key assumptions for the Project used in this analysis. Table III-5: Project Key Assumptions Population Resident Equivalents Residential Value 3.28 (1) 0.33 $698,000 (2) persons per unit employees per resident per unit (FY 2022) (1) Based on review of U.S. Census data for average household size of renter-occupied single-family homes in selected Census Tracts in Temecula. (2) Based on survey of recent sales of single-family homes 2,000 SF or less built after 2016 in Temecula. The FIA also estimates other General Fund revenues and expenditures based on a modified per capita measure known as “resident equivalents.” The approach combines residents and employees to form a single service population. As shown above and summarized below, the resident equivalent approach weighs an employee as 0.33 residents, such that three employees are viewed as having the same impact as one resident. Table III-6: Total Resident Equivalents Total Population Total Employment Total Population + Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (1) City of Temecula 112,771 54,313 167,084 130,694 Project 738 0 738 738 (1) Assumes a resident equivalent factor of 0.33 (three employees have approximately the same impact as one resident). Table III-4: Anticipated Schedule of Development (1) FY 2024 FY 2025 Total Single-Family – Rental 126 111 237 Total Units 126 237 237 (1) Source: Developer, November 3, 2021. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 6 22008kal 19454.052.001 General Fund Revenues This section discusses the recurring General Fund revenue assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the proposed Project. Annual recurring revenues generated by the Project, such as Property Tax and Sales and Use Tax, were estimated based on assumed real estate market factors such as market values/rents for the residential units. One-time revenues, such as Development Impact Fees and building permits used to offset one-time City costs, were not evaluated in this FIA. As shown in Table III-7 below, KMA applied the following escalation factors to estimate the annual General Fund revenues to the City over a 20-year period. The annual escalation factors were based on KMA’s review of recent historical valuation trends in the City, as well as discussions with the City’s Finance Department. Table III-7: Annual Revenue Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Assessed Value (1) Pre-Build-out Post-Build-out Sales Tax Measure S (2) Special Tax (Measure C) (3) Franchise Fees Other General Fund Revenues 5.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 1.5% 2.5% (1) Reflects assumed market escalation. (2) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (3) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. General Fund Expenditures This section discusses the recurring annual General Fund expenditure assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the Project at build-out. Annual recurring expenditures, including Fire, Public Works, and City Council, were estimated by applying a per capita or “per resident equivalent” cost estimate to the number of new residents anticipated from build-out of the Project, with the exception of Police. To estimate Police expenditures, KMA applied the Project’s pro rata share of one (1) new police officer, at an approximate annual cost of approximately $352,000, per 1,000 population added to the City. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 7 22008kal 19454.052.001 The City’s Asset Management Fund, a direct interfund transfer from the Measure S Fund into four (4) separate Asset Management Funds (Street Replacement Fund, Vehicles/Equipment Fleet Replacement Fund, Facilities Replacement Fund, and Technology Replacement Fund), was also included in addition to the General Fund expenditure analysis. Annual escalation factors for each major expenditure category were estimated by KMA based on five- year financial projections for the General Fund presented in the City’s Budget. As shown in Table III-8, General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase at escalation rates ranging between 2.0% and 5.0% per year. KMA also applied a marginal cost adjustment to each expenditure category to reflect that General Fund expenditures do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services, such as overhead and administrative functions within City government. As shown in Table III-8, the marginal cost adjustments assumed by KMA ranged between 0% (no adjustment to per capita assumptions) to 100% (expenditures not impacted by the Project). Table III-8: Annual Expenditure Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Marginal Cost Impact Adjustment (1) Police Public Works – Land Development, Public Works, etc. Fire Public Works – Parks & Maintenance Community Development Finance City Clerk Retiree Medical Contribution City Attorney City Council Community Support PERS Replacement Benefit Property Tax Administration Asset Management Fund General Government 5.00% 2.50% 5.00% 2.50% 2.75% 2.75% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.75% 2.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.50% 2.50% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 90.0% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 100.0% 30.0% 0.0% 40.0% (1) Reflects adjustment to expenditure categories that do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between population growth and demand for municipal services. For example, an increase in population will demand 95% of Police municipal services expenditures per net new resident equivalent. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 8 22008kal 19454.052.001 D. Annual Fiscal Impact to General Fund General Fund Revenues Table III-9 summarizes the KMA estimate of recurring General Fund revenues during the Project’s build- out year (FY 2025). As shown, Property Tax and Property Tax In-Lieu of Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues are the largest source of General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project’s 237 residential units. In FY 2025, the Project is projected to generate approximately $93,700 in Property Tax and $106,300 in Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF revenues. In combination, these sources represent 42.5% of the total General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project. Sales Tax and Measure S revenues, in the form of off-site resident spending captured within the City, represent the next largest components of General Fund revenues as a result of the Project. The Project’s 738 new residents are expected to generate $192,500 of net new revenues in the form of Sales Tax/Measure S revenues to the City in FY 2025. This represents about 40.9% of total revenues generated by the Project. The other sources, including Franchise Fees, Property Transfer Tax, Measure C, Franchise Fees, and all other revenue sources, are anticipated to account for the remaining 16.7% of General Fund revenues generated by the Project. Table III-9: General Fund Revenues in FY 2025 Total % of Total Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax – Resident Spending Measure S – Resident Spending (1) Measure C (2) Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In – Gas Tax Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues (Rounded) $93,700 $106,300 $10,400 $101,300 $91,200 $17,600 $24,900 $1,600 $2,300 $500 $21,200 $100 $471,100 19.9% 22.6% 2.2% 21.5% 19.4% 3.7% 5.3% 0.3% 0.5% 0.1% 4.5% 0.0% 100.0% (1) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (2) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 9 22008kal 19454.052.001 General Fund Expenditures As shown in Table III-10, the total annual General Fund expenditures to provide services to the Project are estimated at $491,100 in FY 2025. Major expenditure categories were estimated based on projections from current service levels. As shown, the Project’s pro rata cost for Police represents the largest of the Project-generated expenditures at $286,000, or 58.2% of total expenditures. Fire services represent the second largest expenditure at $53,800, or 11.0% of the total Project- generated expenditures. The remaining departmental expenditures, including, but not limited to, Public Works, Asset Management Fund, and General Government, account for a combined $151,300, or 30.8% of total expenditures. Table III-10: General Fund Expenditures in FY 2025 Total % of Total Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works – Land Development, etc. Public Works – Park Maintenance Fire (1) Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures (Rounded) $286,000 $2,000 $200 $18,400 $5,900 $2,700 $12,000 $16,800 $43,300 $27,700 $53,800 $400 $600 $0 $21,300 $491,100 58.2% 0.4% 0.0% 3.7% 1.2% 0.5% 2.4% 3.4% 8.8% 5.6% 11.0% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 4.3% 100.0% (1) Expenditures are net of the County Structure Fire Protection Tax. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 10 22008kal 19454.052.001 Annual Fiscal Impact Comparison of the annual revenues and annual expenditures generated by the Project indicates that it will yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund each year after project stabilization over the 20-year period. As shown in Table III-11, the Project’s net fiscal impact is estimated at negative $20,000, or negative $84 per unit, at build-out in Year 2 (FY 2025). The Project’s net fiscal impact reaches negative $338,000, or negative $1,426 per unit, by Year 20 (FY 2043). A more detailed analysis is presented in Appendix B. Table III-11: Annual General Fund Impact Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues (1) General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed Per Year (2) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 2024 $291,000 $251,000 $40,000 $317 1.16 2025 $471,000 $491,000 ($20,000) ($84) 0.96 2026 $482,000 $512,000 ($30,000) ($127) 0.94 2027 $493,000 $534,000 ($41,000) ($173) 0.92 2028 $505,000 $556,000 ($51,000) ($215) 0.91 2029 $517,000 $580,000 ($63,000) ($266) 0.89 2030 $529,000 $605,000 ($76,000) ($321) 0.87 2031 $541,000 $631,000 ($90,000) ($380) 0.86 2032 $554,000 $659,000 ($105,000) ($443) 0.84 2033 $567,000 $687,000 ($120,000) ($506) 0.83 2034 $581,000 $717,000 ($136,000) ($574) 0.81 2035 $595,000 $748,000 ($153,000) ($646) 0.80 2036 $609,000 $781,000 ($172,000) ($726) 0.78 2037 $623,000 $815,000 ($192,000) ($810) 0.76 2038 $638,000 $851,000 ($213,000) ($899) 0.75 2039 $653,000 $888,000 ($235,000) ($992) 0.74 2040 $669,000 $927,000 ($258,000) ($1,089) 0.72 2041 $685,000 $968,000 ($283,000) ($1,194) 0.71 2042 $702,000 $1,011,000 ($309,000) ($1,304) 0.69 2043 $718,000 $1,056,000 ($338,000) ($1,426) 0.68 (1) Includes Project-generated Measure S revenues. (2) Represents annual General Fund impact per unit based on anticipated annual absorption for the Project. Full build-out of the Project does not occur until FY 2025. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 11 22008kal 19454.052.001 IV. LIMITING CONDITONS 1. The KMA analysis is based, in part, on data provided by secondary sources, such as state and local governments, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. While KMA believes that these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. 2. A projection of economic impacts is inherently based on judgment. While KMA considers these projections reasonable for planning purposes, it is the nature of forecasting that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes may be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, may require review or revision of this report. 3. The projections of future economic impact do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. 4. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, Project-specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 5. Any estimates of revenue or cost projections are based on the best Project-specific and fiscal data available at this time as well as experience with comparable projects. They are not intended to be projections of actual future performance of any specific project. 6. Revenue estimates are based on the assumption that sufficient market support exists for the proposed uses and that the Project will achieve industry standard productivity levels. 7. KMA assumes that all applicable laws and governmental regulations in place as of the date of this document will remain unchanged throughout the projection period of our analysis. In the event that this does not hold true, i.e., if any tax rates change, the analysis would need to be revised. 8. Value estimates assume that any necessary entitlements or zoning changes for development can be obtained in a reasonable time frame. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula March 16, 2022 Subject: Prado – Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 12 22008kal 19454.052.001 9. Value estimates assume that property titles are good and marketable; no title search has been made, nor has KMA attempted to determine property ownership. The value estimates are given without regard to any questions of boundaries, encumbrances, liens, or encroachments. 10. Property tax projections reflect KMA's understanding of the assessment and tax apportionment procedures employed by the County. The County procedures are subject to change as a reflection of policy revisions or legislative mandate. While we believe our estimates to be reasonable, taxable values resulting from actual appraisals may vary from the amounts assumed in the projections. 11. No assurances are provided by KMA as to the certainty of the projected tax revenues shown in this document. Actual revenues may be higher or lower than what has been projected and are subject to valuation changes resulting from new developments or transfers of ownership not specifically identified herein, actual resolution of outstanding appeals, future filing of appeals, or the non- payment of taxes due. 12. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective, new, or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). 13. KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor to the City and does not assume any fiduciary duty hereunder, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty to the City pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act with respect to the services provided hereunder and any information and material contained in KMA’s work product. 14. The City shall discuss any such information and material contained in KMA’s work product with any and all internal and/or external advisors and experts, including its own municipal advisors, that it deems appropriate before acting on the information and material. attachments APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PRADO Demographic Profile and City of Temecula General Fund Budget DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - CITY OF TEMECULA, 2021 ESTIMATES (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Population Population 112,771 Average Household Size 3.24 Jobs (2)54,313 II.Housing Units Single-Family 30,100 82.1% Multi-Family 6,389 17.4% Mobile Homes 162 0.4% Total 36,651 100.0% III.Occupied Units 34,719 IV.Percent Vacant 5.3% (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021. (2)Source: U.S. Census Bureau OnTheMap - Total All Jobs, Employment By Place of Work. TABLE A-1 2021 Estimates Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 13 SUMMARY OF CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL FUND BUDGET - FY 2022 ADOPTED OPERATING BUDGET PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Adopted Budget I.Revenues Property Tax $9,619,754 Sales and Use Tax $39,890,358 (Less) Sales Tax Sharing Agreement ($1,330,198) Franchise Fees $3,638,356 Transient Occupancy Tax $3,246,636 Special Tax (Measure C)$1,872,624 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges $4,795,860 Fines and Forfeitures $381,132 Use of Money and Property $413,092 Intergovernmental Revenues $9,166,648 Reimbursements $2,883,265 Miscellaneous $9,360 Subtotal - Revenues $74,586,887 Add: Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF/CARES Act $3,504,741 Add: Operating Transfers In - Measure S $9,266,670 Total - Operating Transfers In $12,771,411 Total Revenues $87,358,298 II.Expenditures City Council $543,152 Community Support $125,000 City Manager $1,682,593 Economic Development $1,738,548 Emergency Management $344,603 City Clerk $1,373,770 City Attorney $750,000 Finance $2,788,778 Human Resources $1,274,334 Planning $2,809,981 Building & Safety $3,451,649 Land Development $1,939,220 Public Works $6,351,426 CIP Admin $2,545,276 Parks Maintenance $4,374,782 Police $38,283,397 Fire $9,413,520 Animal Control $500,958 Non-Departmental $1,391,280 Total Expenditures $81,682,267 III.Total Surplus/(Deficit)$5,676,031 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.07 TABLE A-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 14 SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Revenues FY 2022 Adopted Budget I.Revenues - Included in Analysis A.Taxes and Franchises Property Tax $9,619,754 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Sales and Use Tax $39,890,358 projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development Sales Tax Sharing Agreement ($1,330,198)projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development Franchise Fees $3,638,356 projected based on population Special Tax (Measure C)$1,872,624 based on residential units and commercial acreage developed Subtotal - Taxes and Franchises $53,690,894 B.Business Licenses $260,100 projected based on population and employment C.Fines and Forfeitures $381,132 projected based on population and employment D.Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $9,091,916 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Vehicle License Fees $74,732 projected based on population Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenues $9,166,648 E.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $3,007,060 projected based on population F.Miscellaneous $9,360 projected based on population and employment Total Revenues - Included in Analysis $66,515,194 II.Revenues - Excluded from Analysis A.Transient Occupancy Tax $3,246,636 hotel use not planned as part of Project B.Reimbursements Capital Improvement Program $2,290,748 independent of projected incremental development Pechanga IGA $352,363 independent of projected incremental development Other Reimbursements $240,154 independent of projected incremental development Subtotal - Reimbursements $2,883,265 C.Development Impact Fees $18,000 independent of projected incremental development D.Use of Money and Property Lease/Rental Income $213,625 independent of projected incremental development Investment Interest $122,500 independent of projected incremental development Other $76,967 independent of projected incremental development Subtotal - Use of Money and Property $413,092 E.Operating Transfers In Measure S Fund $9,266,670 independent of incremental development COPS $279,850 independent of incremental development Fire Station 73 Repayment $190,327 independent of incremental development CARES Act (State)$0 independent of incremental development Fund 161 Major Crimes $27,504 independent of incremental development Subtotal - Operating Transfers In $9,764,351 Total Revenues - Excluded from Analysis $16,325,344 III.Charges for Services A.Deducted from Community Development Building $2,344,552 Development Fees $285,495 Planning $714,106 Total Deducted from Community Development $3,344,153 B.Deducted from Public Works Land Development $371,090 Public Works $4,845 Parks Maintenance $1,020 Total Deducted from Public Works $376,955 C.Deducted from Police $46,000 D.Deducted from Fire $750,652 Total Charges for Services $4,517,760 IV.Total General Fund Revenues $87,358,298 TABLE A-3 Comments Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 15 SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Net After Expenditures Deduction of FY 2022 Charges for Services Adopted Budget (Table A-3) I.Expenditures Included in Analysis City Council $543,152 $0 $543,152 Community Support $125,000 $0 $125,000 General Government City Manager $1,682,593 Economic Development $1,738,548 Human Resources $1,274,334 Emergency Management $344,603 Subtotal General Government $5,040,078 $0 $5,040,078 City Clerk $1,373,770 $0 $1,373,770 City Attorney $750,000 $0 $750,000 Finance $2,788,778 $0 $2,788,778 Community Development Planning $2,809,981 Building & Safety $3,451,649 Animal Control $500,958 Subtotal Community Development $6,762,588 ($3,344,153) $3,418,435 Public Works Land Development $1,939,220 Public Works $6,351,426 Subtotal Public Works $8,290,646 ($375,935) $7,914,711 Public Works Parks Maintenance $4,374,782 ($1,020) $4,373,762 Fire $9,413,520 ($750,652) $8,662,868 Non-Departmental Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $101,423 Property Tax Administration $89,857 Staffing Community Reserve $200,000 Subtotal Non-Departmental $1,391,280 $0 $1,391,280 Add: Asset Management Fund $3,500,000 $0 $3,500,000 Total Expenditures - Included in Analysis $44,353,594 $39,881,834 II.Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis Police (1)$38,283,397 ($46,000) $38,237,397 CIP Administration $2,545,276 $0 $2,545,276 Total Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis $40,828,673 $40,782,673 III.Total General Fund Expenditures $85,182,267 $80,664,507 (1) Per City; police expenditures included in analysis reflect project pro rata share of one new police officer per 1,000 population. TABLE A-4 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 16 APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS PRADO 20-Year Projection SUMMARY OF ANNUAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT GENERATED BY PROJECT PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2024 $291,000 $251,000 $40,000 $317 1.16 2 2025 $471,000 $491,000 ($20,000)($84)0.96 3 2026 $482,000 $512,000 ($30,000)($127)0.94 4 2027 $493,000 $534,000 ($41,000)($173)0.92 5 2028 $505,000 $556,000 ($51,000)($215)0.91 6 2029 $517,000 $580,000 ($63,000)($266)0.89 7 2030 $529,000 $605,000 ($76,000)($321)0.87 8 2031 $541,000 $631,000 ($90,000)($380)0.86 9 2032 $554,000 $659,000 ($105,000)($443)0.84 10 2033 $567,000 $687,000 ($120,000)($506)0.83 11 2034 $581,000 $717,000 ($136,000)($574)0.81 12 2035 $595,000 $748,000 ($153,000)($646)0.80 13 2036 $609,000 $781,000 ($172,000)($726)0.78 14 2037 $623,000 $815,000 ($192,000)($810)0.76 15 2038 $638,000 $851,000 ($213,000)($899)0.75 16 2039 $653,000 $888,000 ($235,000)($992)0.74 17 2040 $669,000 $927,000 ($258,000)($1,089)0.72 18 2041 $685,000 $968,000 ($283,000)($1,194)0.71 19 2042 $702,000 $1,011,000 ($309,000)($1,304)0.69 20 2043 $718,000 $1,056,000 ($338,000)($1,426)0.68 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio TABLE B-1 Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed Per Year Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 17 TABLE B-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Net Site Area (1)23.0 Acres II.Density 10.3 Units/Net Acre III.Construction Type Type V-B IV.Number of Stories 2 Stories V.Unit Mix A.Plan 1 1,410 SF 56 Units B.Plan 2 1,520 SF 112 Units C.Plan 3 1,647 SF 46 Units D.Plan 4 1,858 SF 23 Units E.Total/Average 1,551 SF 237 Units VI.Parking A.2-Car Garage 474 Spaces B.Head-in 35 Spaces C.Parallel 166 Spaces D.Total 675 Spaces Parking Ratio 2.85 Spaces/Unit (1)Excludes Easements and W.Q. Basin. (2)Per Developer. Assumed to exclude garage square feet. Unit Size (2)Units Source: AHV Communities Conceptual Site Plan, August 30, 2021. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ABSORPTION (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental 237 Units 126 111 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 126 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 II.Total Cumulative Units 237 Units 126 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 237 (1)Per Developer, November 3, 2021. TABLE B-3 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 19 TABLE B-4 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL POPULATION PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Total Resident I.Residential Factor (1)Persons/Unit (2)Population Single-Family Detached - Rental 237 Units 5.0%3.28 738 II.Total Population 738 (1)KMA assumption reflecting average vacancy rate, based on typical lender underwriting criteria for residential uses. (2)Based on review of U.S. Census data for average household size of renter-occupied single-family homes in selected Census Tracts in Temecula. Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 20 POPULATION ESTIMATES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Factor Per Unit FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental 237 Units 5.0%3.28 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 II.Total Population 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 21 POPULATION ESTIMATES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons Factor Per Unit I.Single-Family Detached - Rental 237 Units 5.0%3.28 II.Total Population TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 22 ESTIMATE OF ASSESSED VALUE (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Assessed Value I.Residential Per Unit (1) Single-Family Detached - Rental 237 Units $698,000 Per SF $450 (1)Based on survey of recent sales of single-family homes 2,000 SF or less built after 2016 in Temecula. TABLE B-6 Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 23 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $96,963,000 $188,592,000 $192,364,000 $196,212,000 $200,136,000 $204,138,000 $208,221,000 $212,386,000 $216,633,000 $220,966,000 II.Total Assessed Value $96,963,000 $188,592,000 $192,364,000 $196,212,000 $200,136,000 $204,138,000 $208,221,000 $212,386,000 $216,633,000 $220,966,000 (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 24 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Assessed Value (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $225,385,000 $229,893,000 $234,491,000 $239,181,000 $243,964,000 $248,844,000 $253,821,000 $258,897,000 $264,075,000 $269,356,000 $225,385,000 $229,893,000 $234,491,000 $239,181,000 $243,964,000 $248,844,000 $253,821,000 $258,897,000 $264,075,000 $269,356,000 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 25 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $48,191 $93,730 $95,605 $97,517 $99,468 $101,457 $103,486 $105,556 $107,667 $109,820 II.Total Property Tax Revenues $48,191 $93,730 $95,605 $97,517 $99,468 $101,457 $103,486 $105,556 $107,667 $109,820 TABLE B-8 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 26 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97% I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Property Tax Revenues TABLE B-8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $112,016 $114,257 $116,542 $118,873 $121,250 $123,675 $126,149 $128,672 $131,245 $133,870 $112,016 $114,257 $116,542 $118,873 $121,250 $123,675 $126,149 $128,672 $131,245 $133,870 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 27 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $54,652 $106,297 $108,423 $110,592 $112,803 $115,059 $117,360 $119,708 $122,101 $124,544 II.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues $54,652 $106,297 $108,423 $110,592 $112,803 $115,059 $117,360 $119,708 $122,101 $124,544 TABLE B-9 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 28 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues TABLE B-9 OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $127,034 $129,575 $132,167 $134,810 $137,506 $140,257 $143,062 $145,923 $148,841 $151,818 $127,034 $129,575 $132,167 $134,810 $137,506 $140,257 $143,062 $145,923 $148,841 $151,818 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 29 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $53,330 $10,373 $10,580 $10,792 $11,008 $11,228 $11,452 $11,681 $11,915 $12,153 II.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $53,330 $10,373 $10,580 $10,792 $11,008 $11,228 $11,452 $11,681 $11,915 $12,153 (1)Assumes property turnover occurs after full build-out of the Project. TABLE B-10 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 30 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (1) PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10% I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues (1)Assumes property turnover occurs after full build-out of the Project. TABLE B-10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $12,396 $12,644 $12,897 $13,155 $13,418 $13,686 $13,960 $14,239 $14,524 $14,815 $12,396 $12,644 $12,897 $13,155 $13,418 $13,686 $13,960 $14,239 $14,524 $14,815 t. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 31 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPENDING BY RESIDENTS PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA 2022 Single-Family Detached - Rental I.Estimate of Household Income Average Rent $3,650 (1) Per SF $2.35 Total Annual Costs $43,800 % of Income Spent on Housing 30% Annual Income Required $146,000 II.Number of Households Total Number of Residential Units 237 Occupancy Rate 95% Total Number of Full-Time Equivalent Households 225 III.Aggregate Household Income $32,872,000 (1)KMA estimate. Based on review of single-family rents in Temecula, Winchester, and Murrieta built after 2010. TABLE B-11 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename i: \Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 32 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $52,300 $101,300 $104,400 $107,500 $110,700 $114,100 $117,500 $121,000 $124,600 $128,400 II.Total Sales Tax Revenues $52,300 $101,300 $104,400 $107,500 $110,700 $114,100 $117,500 $121,000 $124,600 $128,400 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 33 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Sales Tax Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $132,200 $136,200 $140,300 $144,500 $148,800 $153,300 $157,900 $162,600 $167,500 $172,500 $132,200 $136,200 $140,300 $144,500 $148,800 $153,300 $157,900 $162,600 $167,500 $172,500 ornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 34 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Family Detached - Rental $47,100 $91,200 $93,900 $96,800 $99,700 $102,600 $105,700 $108,900 $112,200 $115,500 II.Total Measure S Revenues $47,100 $91,200 $93,900 $96,800 $99,700 $102,600 $105,700 $108,900 $112,200 $115,500 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 35 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Single-Family Detached - Rental II.Total Measure S Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $119,000 $122,600 $126,200 $130,000 $133,900 $137,900 $142,100 $146,300 $150,700 $155,300 $119,000 $122,600 $126,200 $130,000 $133,900 $137,900 $142,100 $146,300 $150,700 $155,300 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 36 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 112,771 (1)54,313 (2)167,084 130,694 Prado 738 0 738 738 Amount Per City Resident or New Residents/ FY 2022 Service Resident Resident Adopted Budget (4)Population Equivalent Equivalents I.Franchise Fees $3,638,356 P $32.26 738 II.Business Licenses $260,100 RE $1.99 738 III.Fines and Forfeitures $381,132 RE $2.92 738 IV.Vehicle License Fees $74,732 P $0.66 738 V.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $3,007,060 P $26.67 738 VI.Miscellaneous Revenue $9,360 RE $0.07 738 VII.Total Other Revenues Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021. (2)Source: U.S. Census Bureau OnTheMap - Total All Jobs, Employment By Place of Work. (3)KMA assumption. Assumes that approximately three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4)See Table A-3. TABLE B-14 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 37 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Population FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Total Residential Population 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 II.Total Resident Equivalents 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$32.26 P $13,063 $24,898 $25,271 $25,650 $26,035 $26,426 $26,822 $27,224 $27,633 $28,047 Business Licenses $1.99 RE $822 $1,582 $1,621 $1,662 $1,703 $1,746 $1,789 $1,834 $1,880 $1,927 Fines and Forfeitures $2.92 RE $1,204 $2,318 $2,376 $2,435 $2,496 $2,558 $2,622 $2,688 $2,755 $2,824 Vehicle License Fees $0.66 P $274 $527 $540 $553 $567 $581 $596 $611 $626 $642 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $26.67 P $11,010 $21,192 $21,722 $22,265 $22,822 $23,392 $23,977 $24,576 $25,191 $25,820 Miscellaneous Revenue $0.07 RE $30 $57 $58 $60 $61 $63 $64 $66 $68 $69 IV.Total Other Revenues $26,400 $50,600 $51,600 $52,600 $53,700 $54,800 $55,900 $57,000 $58,200 $59,300 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 38 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$32.26 P Business Licenses $1.99 RE Fines and Forfeitures $2.92 RE Vehicle License Fees $0.66 P Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $26.67 P Miscellaneous Revenue $0.07 RE IV.Total Other Revenues (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 $28,468 $28,895 $29,328 $29,768 $30,215 $30,668 $31,128 $31,595 $32,069 $32,550 $1,975 $2,025 $2,075 $2,127 $2,180 $2,235 $2,291 $2,348 $2,407 $2,467 $2,894 $2,967 $3,041 $3,117 $3,195 $3,275 $3,357 $3,441 $3,527 $3,615 $658 $674 $691 $708 $726 $744 $763 $782 $801 $821 $26,466 $27,128 $27,806 $28,501 $29,213 $29,944 $30,692 $31,460 $32,246 $33,052 $71 $73 $75 $77 $78 $80 $82 $84 $87 $89 $60,500 $61,800 $63,000 $64,300 $65,600 $66,900 $68,300 $69,700 $71,100 $72,600 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 39 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Annual Escalation 0% Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Single-Famlily Detached - Rental $9,400 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 II.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $9,400 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 40 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Annual Escalation 0% Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel I.Single-Famlily Detached - Rental II.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 E C) REVENUE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 41 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs City of Temecula 112,771 (1)54,313 (2)167,084 130,694 Prado 738 0 738 738 Amount Per Net New City Resident or New Residents/"Marginal Cost"Residents/ FY 2022 Escalation Service Population Resident Resident Impact Resident Adopted Budget (4)Factor (5)Population Type Equivalent Equivalent Adjustment (7)Equivalent I.Police ---5.00%------$352.36 (6)738 5%701 II.City Council $543,152 2.75%RE 130,694 $4.16 738 40%443 III.Community Support $125,000 2.00%RE 130,694 $0.96 738 80%148 IV.General Government $5,040,078 2.50%RE 130,694 $38.56 738 40%443 V.City Clerk $1,373,770 3.00%RE 130,694 $10.51 738 30%517 VI.City Attorney $750,000 2.00%RE 130,694 $5.74 738 40%443 VII.Finance $2,788,778 2.75%RE 130,694 $21.34 738 30%517 VIII.Community Development $3,418,435 2.75%RE 130,694 $26.16 738 20%590 IX.Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$7,914,711 2.50%RE 130,694 $60.56 738 10%664 X.Public Works - Parks Maintenance $4,373,762 2.50%P 112,771 $38.78 738 10%664 XI.Fire $8,662,868 5.00%RE 130,694 $66.28 738 5%701 XII.Property Tax Administration $89,857 2.00%RE 130,694 $0.69 738 30%517 XIII.Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 3.00%RE 130,694 $7.65 738 90%74 XIV.PERS Replacement Benefit $101,423 3.00%RE 130,694 $0.78 738 100%0 XV.Asset Management Fund $3,500,000 2.50%RE 130,694 $26.78 738 0%738 XVI.Total Annual Expenditures $39,681,834 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2021. (2) Source: U.S. Census Bureau OnTheMap - Total All Jobs, Employment By Place of Work. (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-4. (5) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (6) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population per the FY 2021 Mid-Year Budget. (7) Reflects adjustment to expenditures that may not have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services. TABLE B-16 Total Resident Equivalents (3) Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment (3)Pop.FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Total Residential Population 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 II.Total Resident Equivalents 393 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%---$145,039 $285,982 $300,281 $315,295 $331,060 $347,612 $364,993 $383,243 $402,405 $422,525 City Council $4.16 2.75%40%RE $1,035 $1,996 $2,051 $2,108 $2,166 $2,225 $2,286 $2,349 $2,414 $2,480 Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE $78 $150 $153 $156 $159 $162 $165 $169 $172 $176 General Government $38.56 2.50%40%RE $9,554 $18,389 $18,849 $19,320 $19,803 $20,298 $20,806 $21,326 $21,859 $22,405 City Clerk $10.51 3.00%30%RE $3,068 $5,934 $6,112 $6,295 $6,484 $6,678 $6,879 $7,085 $7,298 $7,517 City Attorney $5.74 2.00%40%RE $1,408 $2,697 $2,751 $2,806 $2,862 $2,919 $2,977 $3,037 $3,098 $3,159 Finance $21.34 2.75%30%RE $6,197 $11,958 $12,287 $12,625 $12,972 $13,329 $13,695 $14,072 $14,459 $14,856 Community Development $26.16 2.75%20%RE $8,682 $16,752 $17,213 $17,686 $18,172 $18,672 $19,185 $19,713 $20,255 $20,812 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$60.56 2.50%10%RE $22,504 $43,316 $44,399 $45,509 $46,647 $47,813 $49,008 $50,233 $51,489 $52,776 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $38.78 2.50%10%P $14,413 $27,741 $28,435 $29,146 $29,874 $30,621 $31,387 $32,172 $32,976 $33,800 Fire $66.28 5.00%5%RE $27,283 $53,796 $56,486 $59,310 $62,276 $65,390 $68,659 $72,092 $75,697 $79,482 Property Tax Administration $0.69 2.00%30%RE $197 $377 $384 $392 $400 $408 $416 $424 $433 $442 Retiree Medical Contribution $7.65 3.00%90%RE $319 $617 $636 $655 $674 $694 $715 $737 $759 $782 PERS Replacement Benefit $0.78 3.00%100%RE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $26.78 2.50%0%RE $11,057 $21,283 $21,815 $22,361 $22,920 $23,493 $24,080 $24,682 $25,299 $25,932 IV.Total Annual Expenditures $250,834 $490,988 $511,852 $533,664 $556,469 $580,314 $605,251 $631,334 $658,613 $687,144 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. (3) Reflects adjustment to expenditures that may not have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services. TABLE B-18 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 43 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2022 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment (3)Pop. I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%--- City Council $4.16 2.75%40%RE Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE General Government $38.56 2.50%40%RE City Clerk $10.51 3.00%30%RE City Attorney $5.74 2.00%40%RE Finance $21.34 2.75%30%RE Community Development $26.16 2.75%20%RE Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$60.56 2.50%10%RE Public Works - Parks Maintenance $38.78 2.50%10%P Fire $66.28 5.00%5%RE Property Tax Administration $0.69 2.00%30%RE Retiree Medical Contribution $7.65 3.00%90%RE PERS Replacement Benefit $0.78 3.00%100%RE Asset Management Fund $26.78 2.50%0%RE IV.Total Annual Expenditures (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. (3) Reflects adjustment to expenditures that may not have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services. TABLE B-18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 738 $443,651 $465,834 $489,126 $513,582 $539,261 $566,224 $594,535 $624,262 $655,475 $688,249 $2,548 $2,618 $2,690 $2,764 $2,840 $2,919 $2,999 $3,081 $3,166 $3,253 $179 $183 $186 $190 $194 $198 $202 $206 $210 $214 $22,965 $23,540 $24,128 $24,731 $25,350 $25,983 $26,633 $27,299 $27,981 $28,681 $7,742 $7,974 $8,214 $8,460 $8,714 $8,975 $9,244 $9,522 $9,807 $10,102 $3,223 $3,287 $3,353 $3,420 $3,488 $3,558 $3,629 $3,702 $3,776 $3,851 $15,265 $15,685 $16,116 $16,559 $17,015 $17,482 $17,963 $18,457 $18,965 $19,486 $21,384 $21,973 $22,577 $23,198 $23,836 $24,491 $25,165 $25,857 $26,568 $27,298 $54,096 $55,448 $56,834 $58,255 $59,712 $61,204 $62,735 $64,303 $65,911 $67,558 $34,645 $35,511 $36,399 $37,309 $38,242 $39,198 $40,178 $41,182 $42,212 $43,267 $83,456 $87,629 $92,010 $96,611 $101,441 $106,513 $111,839 $117,431 $123,302 $129,467 $450 $459 $469 $478 $488 $497 $507 $517 $528 $538 $805 $829 $854 $880 $906 $933 $961 $990 $1,020 $1,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,580 $27,244 $27,926 $28,624 $29,339 $30,073 $30,825 $31,595 $32,385 $33,195 $716,989 $748,214 $780,882 $815,061 $850,826 $888,248 $927,415 $968,404 $1,011,306 $1,056,209 unicipal services. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 44 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax $48,191 $93,730 $95,605 $97,517 $99,468 $101,457 $103,486 $105,556 $107,667 $109,820 Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $54,652 $106,297 $108,423 $110,592 $112,803 $115,059 $117,360 $119,708 $122,101 $124,544 Property Transfer Tax $53,330 $10,373 $10,580 $10,792 $11,008 $11,228 $11,452 $11,681 $11,915 $12,153 Sales Tax - Resident Spending $52,300 $101,300 $104,400 $107,500 $110,700 $114,100 $117,500 $121,000 $124,600 $128,400 Measure S $47,100 $91,200 $93,900 $96,800 $99,700 $102,600 $105,700 $108,900 $112,200 $115,500 Measure C $9,400 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 Franchise Fees $13,063 $24,898 $25,271 $25,650 $26,035 $26,426 $26,822 $27,224 $27,633 $28,047 Business Licenses $822 $1,582 $1,621 $1,662 $1,703 $1,746 $1,789 $1,834 $1,880 $1,927 Fines and Forfeitures $1,204 $2,318 $2,376 $2,435 $2,496 $2,558 $2,622 $2,688 $2,755 $2,824 Vehicle License Fees $274 $527 $540 $553 $567 $581 $596 $611 $626 $642 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $11,010 $21,192 $21,722 $22,265 $22,822 $23,392 $23,977 $24,576 $25,191 $25,820 Miscellaneous Revenue $30 $57 $58 $60 $61 $63 $64 $66 $68 $69 Total Revenues $291,000 $471,000 $482,000 $493,000 $505,000 $517,000 $529,000 $541,000 $554,000 $567,000 II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $145,039 $285,982 $300,281 $315,295 $331,060 $347,612 $364,993 $383,243 $402,405 $422,525 City Council $1,035 $1,996 $2,051 $2,108 $2,166 $2,225 $2,286 $2,349 $2,414 $2,480 Community Support $78 $150 $153 $156 $159 $162 $165 $169 $172 $176 General Government $9,554 $18,389 $18,849 $19,320 $19,803 $20,298 $20,806 $21,326 $21,859 $22,405 City Clerk $3,068 $5,934 $6,112 $6,295 $6,484 $6,678 $6,879 $7,085 $7,298 $7,517 City Attorney $1,408 $2,697 $2,751 $2,806 $2,862 $2,919 $2,977 $3,037 $3,098 $3,159 Finance $6,197 $11,958 $12,287 $12,625 $12,972 $13,329 $13,695 $14,072 $14,459 $14,856 Community Development $8,682 $16,752 $17,213 $17,686 $18,172 $18,672 $19,185 $19,713 $20,255 $20,812 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$22,504 $43,316 $44,399 $45,509 $46,647 $47,813 $49,008 $50,233 $51,489 $52,776 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $14,413 $27,741 $28,435 $29,146 $29,874 $30,621 $31,387 $32,172 $32,976 $33,800 Fire $27,283 $53,796 $56,486 $59,310 $62,276 $65,390 $68,659 $72,092 $75,697 $79,482 Property Tax Administration $197 $377 $384 $392 $400 $408 $416 $424 $433 $442 Retiree Medical Contribution $319 $617 $636 $655 $674 $694 $715 $737 $759 $782 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $11,057 $21,283 $21,815 $22,361 $22,920 $23,493 $24,080 $24,682 $25,299 $25,932 Total Expenditures $251,000 $491,000 $512,000 $534,000 $556,000 $580,000 $605,000 $631,000 $659,000 $687,000 III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit)$40,000 ($20,000)($30,000)($41,000)($51,000)($63,000)($76,000)($90,000)($105,000)($120,000) Per Unit Absorbed Per Year $317 ($84)($127)($173)($215)($266)($321)($380)($443)($506) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 1.16 0.96 0.94 0.92 0.91 0.89 0.87 0.86 0.84 0.83 TABLE B-19 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 45 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT PRADO - FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. Public Works - Parks Maintenance Fire Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed Per Year Revenues to Expenditure Ratio TABLE B-19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $112,016 $114,257 $116,542 $118,873 $121,250 $123,675 $126,149 $128,672 $131,245 $133,870 $127,034 $129,575 $132,167 $134,810 $137,506 $140,257 $143,062 $145,923 $148,841 $151,818 $12,396 $12,644 $12,897 $13,155 $13,418 $13,686 $13,960 $14,239 $14,524 $14,815 $132,200 $136,200 $140,300 $144,500 $148,800 $153,300 $157,900 $162,600 $167,500 $172,500 $119,000 $122,600 $126,200 $130,000 $133,900 $137,900 $142,100 $146,300 $150,700 $155,300 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $17,600 $28,468 $28,895 $29,328 $29,768 $30,215 $30,668 $31,128 $31,595 $32,069 $32,550 $1,975 $2,025 $2,075 $2,127 $2,180 $2,235 $2,291 $2,348 $2,407 $2,467 $2,894 $2,967 $3,041 $3,117 $3,195 $3,275 $3,357 $3,441 $3,527 $3,615 $658 $674 $691 $708 $726 $744 $763 $782 $801 $821 $26,466 $27,128 $27,806 $28,501 $29,213 $29,944 $30,692 $31,460 $32,246 $33,052 $71 $73 $75 $77 $78 $80 $82 $84 $87 $89 $581,000 $595,000 $609,000 $623,000 $638,000 $653,000 $669,000 $685,000 $702,000 $718,000 $443,651 $465,834 $489,126 $513,582 $539,261 $566,224 $594,535 $624,262 $655,475 $688,249 $2,548 $2,618 $2,690 $2,764 $2,840 $2,919 $2,999 $3,081 $3,166 $3,253 $179 $183 $186 $190 $194 $198 $202 $206 $210 $214 $22,965 $23,540 $24,128 $24,731 $25,350 $25,983 $26,633 $27,299 $27,981 $28,681 $7,742 $7,974 $8,214 $8,460 $8,714 $8,975 $9,244 $9,522 $9,807 $10,102 $3,223 $3,287 $3,353 $3,420 $3,488 $3,558 $3,629 $3,702 $3,776 $3,851 $15,265 $15,685 $16,116 $16,559 $17,015 $17,482 $17,963 $18,457 $18,965 $19,486 $21,384 $21,973 $22,577 $23,198 $23,836 $24,491 $25,165 $25,857 $26,568 $27,298 $54,096 $55,448 $56,834 $58,255 $59,712 $61,204 $62,735 $64,303 $65,911 $67,558 $34,645 $35,511 $36,399 $37,309 $38,242 $39,198 $40,178 $41,182 $42,212 $43,267 $83,456 $87,629 $92,010 $96,611 $101,441 $106,513 $111,839 $117,431 $123,302 $129,467 $450 $459 $469 $478 $488 $497 $507 $517 $528 $538 $805 $829 $854 $880 $906 $933 $961 $990 $1,020 $1,050 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,580 $27,244 $27,926 $28,624 $29,339 $30,073 $30,825 $31,595 $32,385 $33,195 $717,000 $748,000 $781,000 $815,000 $851,000 $888,000 $927,000 $968,000 $1,011,000 $1,056,000 ($136,000)($153,000)($172,000)($192,000)($213,000)($235,000)($258,000)($283,000)($309,000)($338,000) ($574)($646)($726)($810)($899)($992)($1,089)($1,194)($1,304)($1,426) 0.81 0.80 0.78 0.76 0.75 0.74 0.72 0.71 0.69 0.68 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Prado FIA_03-16-22;3/16/2022;mdt Page 46 Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA April 21, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA21-0838, a Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres; and PA21-0839, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. The project is located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a receipt in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting to the email listed below. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at email: scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment – Filing Fee Receipt VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com [ T y p e a q u o t e f r o m t h e d o c u m e n t o r t h e s u m m a r y o f a n i n t City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2019070974 Project Title: Prado (PA21-0838, PA21-0839) Project Location: Terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road (APNs: 916-400- 051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067). Project Description: Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication. Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above-described project on April 20, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the SEIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the SEIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR . 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the SEIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the SEIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the SEIR. This is to certify that the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) that was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 for the Harveston Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: AHV Communities Project Title: Prado (PA21-0838, PA21-0839) Location: Terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road (APNs: 916-400- 051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400- 067) Project Description: Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication 2. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 237 unit single family residential community and tentative tract map for one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA21-0838, PA21-0839 APPLICANT: AHV Communities PROPOSAL: Development Plan for a 237 unit single family residential community built on 27.5 acres and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38121) for Condominium Purposes for the creation of one (1) residential lot, two (2) open space lots, and one (1) 2.95 acre lot for street and highway dedication located at the terminus of Equity Drive on the west side of Ynez Road (APNs: 916-400-051, 916-400-052, 916-400-053, 916-400-063, 916-400-066, 916-400-067) ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) and Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Sections exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: April 20, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.