HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022-35 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO.2022-35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ANNUAL ACTION
PLAN (2022-2023), 2022-2026 FIVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED
PLAN, 2022 ANALYSIS OF IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR
HOUSING, AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN AS AN
APPLICATION TO THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) FOR FUNDING
UNDER THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) PROGRAM, INCLUDING THE
PROPOSED USE OF FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023
INCLUDING ANY AMENDED OR REVISED AMOUNTS
PROVIDED BY HUD
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby
find, determine and declare that:
A. The City of Temecula has participated directly within the federal Department of
Housing and Urban Development (HUD) as an entitlement jurisdiction for Community
Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds since July 1, 2012;
B. The City of Temecula has prepared all documents, notices, and forms required by
HUD for participation in the CDBG Program by entitlement jurisdictions;
C. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 11-42 on June 14, 2011, initiating the
City to obtain entitlement community status from HUD, and authorized the Director of Community
Development to prepare and return for City Council approval all documents required for the
designation as an Entitlement City, including the Five -Year Consolidated Plan, the Annual Action
Plan, and the Citizen Participation Plan;
D. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-43 on June 28, 2016, approving the
updated Citizen Participation Plan that sets forth the City's policies and procedures for citizen
participation in the development of its Five -Year Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, Annual
Performance Reports, and any substantial amendments deemed necessary for direct administration
of federal CDBG funds;
E. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 16-57 on September 23, 2016, approving
the 2017-21 Assessment of Fair Housing;
F. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 17-24 on April 25, 2017, approving the
2017-21 Five -Year Consolidated Plan and 2017-18 Annual Action Plan;
G. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 18-28 on April 24, 2018, approving the
2018-19 Annual Action Plan;
H. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 19-25 on April 23, 2019, approving the
2019-20 Annual Action Plan;
I. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2020-25 on April 28, 2020, approving
the 2020-21 Annual Action Plan;
J. The City Council adopted Resolution No. 2021-21 on April 27, 2021, approving
the 2021-22 Annual Action Plan;
K. The City of Temecula has prepared an Annual Action Plan to implement the first
year of the Five -Year Consolidated Plan;
L. The Annual Action Plan includes HUD anticipated entitlement funding and the
proposed use of Federal CDBG funds for the upcoming Fiscal Year 2022-23 with
recommendations made by the City's Finance Subcommittee using the budget from the 2021-2022
program year as HUD has not yet determined and released 2022-23 funding allocations;
M. The Annual Action Plan is required by the US Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) and must be approved by that agency for the City to receive federal CDBG
funds each year.
N. The 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan was processed including, but not
limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by Federal, State, and local law;
O. The Five -Year Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plan are required by the US
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and must be approved by that agency for
the City to receive federal CDBG funds each year.
P. The City Council, at a regular meeting, considered the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan,
2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen
Participation Plan, and on April 26, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at
which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in
support or in opposition to this matter.
Q. At the conclusion of the City Council hearing and after due consideration of the
testimony, the City Council approved the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated
Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan subject to and
based upon the findings set forth hereunder.
Section 2. Further Findings. The City Council, in approving the Plan hereby finds,
determines and declares that:
A. Pursuant to Title 24, Housing and Urban Development, of the Code of Federal
Regulations, Subtitle A Office of the Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development,
Part 91 Consolidated Submissions For Community Planning And Development Programs (24 CFR
Part 91) each entitlement jurisdiction must adopt a Five-year Consolidated Plan that states its
overall plan to develop a viable urban community by providing for decent housing, a suitable living
environment, and expanding economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate -income
persons, and prepare an Annual Action Plan each year describing the activities the jurisdiction will
undertake during the next year to address those five-year priority needs and objectives;
B. The City Council must adopt a plan that serves the following functions:
1. A planning document for the jurisdiction, which builds on a participatory
process among citizens, organizations, businesses, and other stakeholders;
jurisdictions;
2. A submission for federal funds under HUD's formula grant programs for
A strategy to be followed in carrying out HUD programs; and
4. A management tool for assessing performance and tracking results.
Section 3. Environmental Findings. The proposed action on the 2022-23 Annual
Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and
Citizen Participation Plan is exempt from National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) pursuant to
the provisions of the National Environmental Policy Act and specifically 24 CFR 58.34(a)(1)
because the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of
Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan is a resource identification study and
the development of plans and strategies for the prioritization and funding of proposed programs
through CDBG and the proposed action involves the feasibility and planning studies to determine
prioritization and CDBG funding to begin the development of certain projects. The potential
projects discussed in the proposed actions that might involve physical activity will be reviewed
under NEPA or the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) as part of the development of
those projects. The proposed action is also exempt from CEQA per CEQA Guidelines Section
15262 and 15378(b)(4).
Section 4. Approvals.
A. The City Council hereby approves the 2022-23 Annual Action Plan, 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan, 2022 Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing, and Citizen Participation Plan,
set forth as Exhibit A attached hereto, and any and all other documents deemed necessary by HUD
to obtain the annual CDBG allocation of the federal CDBG funds and authorizes and directs the
City Manager, or his designee, to serve as the Certifying Officer for all environmental review
procedures associated with the various CDBG projects, and Certifying Officer for the purpose of
signing correspondence, agreements, and other required documents. The City Council also
approves authorizes the City Manager or his designee to make minor or substantial changes the
above documents as deemed necessary by HUD, or as identified as "amendments" within the
. City's approved Citizen Participation Plan.
B The City Council hereby approves an application for CDBG Entitlement funds in
the total amount of $557,586.06; which consists of the allocation of the CDBG current year
program administration of $111,196.40; and consists of the allocation of the CDBG current year
program activities of $446,389.66;
Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula
this 26`h day of April, 2022.
ATTEST:
Randi , City Clerk
[SEAL]
1
Matt Rahn, Mayor
1
1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss
CITY OF TEMECULA )
I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2022-35 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of
Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 26th day of April, 2022, by the following vote:
AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank,
Stewart
NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Randi Johl, City Clerk
5
Consolidated Plan
FY 2022 –2026
Annual Action Plan
FY 2022 –2023
This page is intentionally left blank.
TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL
Matt Rahn
Mayor
Zak Schwank
Mayor Pro Tem
Maryann Edwards
Councilmember
James “Stew ” Stewart
Councilmember
Jessica Alexander
Councilmember
This page is intentionally left blank.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Summary .................................................................................................................................................. 1
ES-05 Executive Summaryf ......................................................................................................................... 1
The Process ....................................................................................................................................................................6
pr-05 lead & responsible agencies – 91.200(B) ................................................................................6
PR-10 Consultation - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(b), 91.300(b), 91.215(l) and 91.315(l) ................ 7
PR-15 Citizen Participation - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(c) and 91.300(c) ..................................... 51
Needs Assessment ................................................................................................................................................. 56
NA-05 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 56
NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment ..................................................................................................... 58
NA-15 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Problems ............................................. 76
NA-20 Disproportionately Greater Need: Severe Housing Problems ........................... 87
NA-25 Disproportionately Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens ...................................94
NA-30 Disproportionately Greater Need: Discussion .............................................................. 96
NA-35 Public Housing ................................................................................................................................. 99
NA-40 Homeless Needs Assessment .............................................................................................. 104
NA-45 Non-Homeless Special Needs Assessment .................................................................. 110
NA-50 Non-Housing Community Development Needs ...................................................... 116
Housing Market Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 122
MA-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................ 122
MA-10 Number of Housing Units ....................................................................................................... 124
MA-15 Housing Market Analysis: Cost of Housing ................................................................... 129
MA-20 Housing Market Analysis: Condition of Housing – 91.210(a) .............................. 134
MA-25 Public and Assisted Housing ................................................................................................. 141
MA-30 Homeless Facilities and Services ....................................................................................... 143
MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services .............................................................................. 147
MA-40 Barriers to Affordable Housing ............................................................................................ 151
MA-45 Non-Housing Community Development Assets ..................................................... 152
MA-50 Needs and Market Analysis Discussion ......................................................................... 160
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN iii
MA-60 Broadband Needs of Housing occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income
Households ...................................................................................................................................................... 165
MA-65 Hazard Mitigation ........................................................................................................................ 168
Strategic Plan .......................................................................................................................................................... 170
SP-05 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 170
SP-10 Geographic Priorities ................................................................................................................... 173
SP-25 Priority Needs ................................................................................................................................... 174
SP-30 Influence of Market Conditions ............................................................................................ 179
SP-35 Anticipated Resources ............................................................................................................... 180
SP-40 Institutional Delivery Structure ............................................................................................ 183
SP-45 Goals Summary .............................................................................................................................. 187
SP-50 Public Housing Accessibility and Involvement .......................................................... 190
SP-55 Barriers to Affordable Housing .............................................................................................. 191
SP-60 Homelessness Strategy ............................................................................................................. 193
SP-65 Lead based paint Hazards ....................................................................................................... 196
SP-70 Anti-Poverty Strategy ................................................................................................................. 198
SP-80 Monitoring ........................................................................................................................................ 200
2022-2023 Action Plan ...................................................................................................................................... 202
AP-15 Expected Resources .................................................................................................................... 202
AP-20 Annual Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................... 204
AP-35 Projects ............................................................................................................................................... 207
AP-38 Project Summary ......................................................................................................................... 208
AP-50 Geographic Distribution ........................................................................................................... 213
AP-55 Affordable Housing ...................................................................................................................... 214
. AP-60 Public Housing ............................................................................................................................. 216
AP-65 Homeless and Other Special Needs Activities............................................................ 217
AP-75 Barriers to Affordable Housing ............................................................................................ 220
AP-85 Other Actions...................................................................................................................................222
AP-90 Program Specific Requirements ........................................................................................225
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 1
Executive Summary
ES-05 EXECUTIVE SUMMARYF
Introduction
Since its incorporation in 1989, the City of Temecula has grown from a small
community of about 27,000 people to a City of over 110,000 residents in 2020.
Temecula identifies as the “heart of southern California wine country.” Residents and
visitors appreciate Temecula’s open and agricultural spaces and arts, dining, and
entertainment. For most of the City’s history, Temecula has served as an affordable
enclave for residents of Los Angeles, Orange, and San Diego Counties. Unfortunately,
decades of housing underproduction on a state and regional level have resulted in
statewide, regional, and local housing market pressure. Housing costs have increased
at a faster pace than median income for the last 10 years. It is challenging to find
affordable housing in Temecula.
The City of Temecula has prepared the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan (Consolidated
Plan) as required to receive federal Community Development Block Grant (CDBG),
funds. The Consolidated Plan provides the United States Department of Housing and
Urban Development (HUD) with a comprehensive assessment of the City’s housing
and community development needs and outlines the City’s priorities, objectives, and
strategies for the investment of CDBG funds to address these needs over the next five
years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026.
The City receives CDBG funds from HUD on a formula basis each year, and in turn,
awards grants, and loans to nonprofit, for-profit or public organizations for programs
and projects in furtherance of this Plan. These programs provide for a wide range of
eligible activities to address the needs of Temecula residents.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
The Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 created the CDBG Program
with three primary objectives against which HUD evaluates the Consolidated Plan
and the City’s performance. Those primary objectives are decent housing, suitable
living environments, and expanded economic opportunities for low- and moderate-
income persons. The CDBG regulations require that each activity meet one of the
following national objectives:
• Benefit low- and moderate-income persons; or
• Aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight; or
• Meet other community development needs having a particular urgency
(usually the result of a natural disaster).
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 2
2022-2023 CDBG Public Service Activities
Assistance League of Temecula Valley, Operation School Bell $7,271
Boys & Girls Club of Southwest County, Before & After School Care $7,271
Community Mission of Hope, Housing Resource Case Mgmt $7,271
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County, Fair Housing Services $20,000
Hospice of the Valleys, Senior Assistance Program $7,271
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center Crisis Intervention & Supportive
Services for Trauma Survivors $7,271
SAFE Family Justice Center, Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families $7,271
Voices for Children, CASA Program $7,271
City of Temecula - Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program. $12,500
2022-2023 CDBG Capital Activities
Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program $50,000
ADA Transition Plan Implementation $332,992
2022-2023 Program Administration Activities
CDBG Program Administration $111,196
Summary of the objectives and outcomes identified in the Plan needs
assessment Overview
The priority needs and goals identified in the Plan needs assessment are based on
analysis of information including the results of the City’s surveys of residents and
stakeholders and the housing and community development data elements required
by HUD in the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite). Data
supplied by HUD includes the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year
Estimates and the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the
same time. Other sources of information used to identify needs and establish priorities
were obtained through consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the
development of affordable housing and the delivery of public services to children,
families, elderly persons, and persons with special needs throughout the community.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed
below are established as part of this Plan:
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Provide public services for low- and moderate-income, special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 3
• Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
• Promote development of affordable housing
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent
housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic
opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above
will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG,
funded activities aligned with the following measurable goals included in the
Strategic Plan section of this Plan
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Public facilities
and
infrastructure
improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Improve
neighborhoods, public
facilities, and
infrastructure
Public facility or
infrastructure
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 20,000
people assisted
2. Affordable
Housing
Development
Affordable
Housing
Promote
development of
affordable housing
Rental units
constructed 80
housing units
3. Housing
Preservation
Affordable
Housing
Preserve the existing
housing stock
Homeowner
housing rehabbed
30 households
4. Services for low-
and moderate-
income residents
Public Services Provide public services
for low- and
moderate-income,
special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit 2,000 people
assisted
5. Services for
residents with
special needs,
including seniors
and veterans
Public Services Provide public services
for low- and
moderate-income,
special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 375 people
assisted
6. Services for the
homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
Homeless Provide public services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 325 people
assisted
Table 1 - Strategic Plan Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 4
Evaluation of past performance
The investment of HUD resources during the 2017-2021 Program Years resulted in
measurable accomplishments that contributed to positive outcomes for Temecula
residents. Together with other federal, state and local investments, HUD resources
allowed the City of Temecula and its partners to:
• Promote the development of affordable housing
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Ensure equal access to housing opportunities
• Provide public services for low- and moderate-income residents
• Provide public services for residents with special needs
• Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
• Provide public services for seniors and veterans
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure
• Promote economic opportunity
Summary of citizen participation process and consultation process
The Consolidated Plan regulations at 24 CFR Part 91 provide the citizen participation
and consultation requirements for the development of the Consolidated Plan. Chief
among those requirements is the need to consult with the Continuum of Care (CoC)
to address homelessness, Public Housing Authorities (PHA), business leaders, civic
leaders and public or private agencies that address housing, health, social service,
victim services, employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and
families, homeless individuals and families, youth and/or other persons with special
needs. Information supplied by these community stakeholders, together with the
data supplied by HUD resulted in a well-informed planning document that reflects
the housing, community and economic development needs and priorities for the City
of Temecula over the next five years.
In accordance with the City’s Citizen Participation Plan, residents and stakeholders
were able to participate in the development of the Consolidated Plan through surveys,
community meetings and public hearings. Efforts were made to encourage
participation by low- and moderate-income persons, particularly those living in areas
where HUD funds are proposed to be used, and by residents of predominantly low -
and moderate-income neighborhoods. Efforts were made to encourage the
participation of minorities and non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with
disabilities. The consultation process included representatives of the CoC, PHA, and
other specified groups who completed surveys, provided local data, and assisted the
City to ensure practical coordination of strategies to maximize impact and to avoid
duplication of effort.
Summary of public comments
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 5
A total of four Community meetings to discuss the housing and community
development needs in Temecula. The first series of meetings were held in person on
October 27, 2021, at 8 am and 6 pm at the Temecula Community Center. This location
was selected to facilitate access to the entire community. The resident survey was
released at this time and closed on January 14, 2022. The second series of meetings
were held virtually via Zoom on December 17, 2021, at 9 am and 5 pm.
The City of Temecula has not received any written comments at this point in the
Consolidated Planning process.
Summary of comments or views not accepted and the reasons for not accepting
them
The City of Temecula has not received any written comments at this point in the
Consolidated Planning process.
Summary
The City of Temecula’s 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan is based on examination of a wide
range of reliable sources, including 2013-2017 American Community Survey (ACS) 5-
Year Estimates and the 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
(CHAS) data provided by HUD’s HUD’s eConPlanning Suite, independently sourced
2013-2017 CHAS data, more recent ACS data, data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics,
Bureau of Economic Analysis, the Centers of Disease Control and other federal
sources, as well as publicly available data from privately held sources such as Zumper,
a rent aggregator, Zillow, a real estate platform, and local data. Quantitative data
analysis together with consultation with citizens and stakeholders revealed four high
priority needs to be addressed through the investment of an anticipated $2,8 million
of CDBG funds over the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan. The investment of
CDBG funds in eligible activities shall be guided principally by five goals of the
Strategic Plan. Activities submitted for consideration in response to any solicitation or
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) process must conform with one of the nine
Strategic Plan strategies and the associated action-oriented, measurable goals to
receive consideration for CDBG funding.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 6
The Process
PR-05 LEAD & RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES – 91.200(B)
1. Describe agency/entity responsible for preparing the Consolidated
Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant program and
funding source
The following are the agencies/entities responsible for preparing the
Consolidated Plan and those responsible for administration of each grant
program and funding source.
Agency Role Name Department/Agency
CDBG Administrator TEMECULA Community Development
Department
Table 2– Responsible Agencies
Narrative
The Community Development Department is the lead department responsible for the
administration of the CDBG program. The City contracted with MDG Associates, Inc.
to prepare the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
In the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City implemented a comprehensive
citizen participation and consultation process and conducted a needs assessment
and market analysis to identify levels of relative need regarding affordable housing,
homelessness, special needs, and community development. This information was
gathered through consultation with public officials and local agencies, public
outreach and community meetings, review of demographic and economic data, and
housing market analysis.
In the implementation of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan and each of the five Annual
Action Plans, the Community Development Department shall be responsible for all
grant planning, management, and monitoring duties necessary to comply with HUD
regulations and City policy.
Consolidated Plan Public Contact Information
Brandon Rabidou
Senior Management Analyst
City of Temecula
(951) 506-5142
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 7
PR-10 CONSULTATION - 91.100, 91.110, 91.200(B),
91.300(B), 91.215(L) AND 91.315(L)
1. Introduction
In preparing the Consolidated Plan, the City of Temecula consulted with
representatives from multiple agencies, groups, and organizations involved in the
development of affordable housing, creation of job opportunities for low- and
moderate-income residents, and the provision of services to children, seniors, persons
with special needs, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, and homeless persons.
To facilitate this consultation, the City solicited feedback through the following
methods:
• Stakeholder surveys (web-based and paper-surveys)
• Individual stakeholder consultations
• Community meetings
• Public hearings
• Receipt of written comments
To gather the greatest depth of information, the City consulted with a wide variety of
agencies, groups and organizations concerning the housing, community, and
economic development needs of the community. The primary agencies, groups or
organizations consulted can be found on the following pages. The input received from
these consultation partners helped establish the objectives and goals described in the
Strategic Plan.
Provide a concise summary of the jurisdiction’s activities to enhance
coordination between public and assisted housing providers and private
and governmental health, mental health, and service agencies (91.215(I)).
The City recognizes the importance of coordination and alignment among various
service providers to maximize the effectiveness of the CDBG program. As a result,
during the development of this Consolidated Plan, the City consulted closely with
organizations that provide assisted housing, health services and other community-
focused programs. Outreach efforts included surveys and invitations to community
meetings and follow-up in-person interviews where appropriate.
The City further recognizes the importance of continued coordination and alignment
during the upcoming five-year planning period with these organizations and
agencies. The City will strengthen relationships and alignment among these
organizations in the implementation of the NOFA process for CDBG funds and
through technical assistance. The City monitors its affordable housing units every year
to ensure compliance with State and Federal requirements, supports the County’s
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 8
Section 8 program and participates in the County’s Mortgage Credit Certificate (MCC)
program.
Describe coordination with the Continuum of Care and efforts to address
the needs of homeless persons (particularly chronically homeless
individuals and families, families with children, veterans, and
unaccompanied youth) and persons at risk of homelessness
The Continuum of Care of Riverside County (CoC) guides the development of
homeless strategies and the implementation of programs to end homelessness
throughout the region. The CoC is comprised of a network of public, private, faith-
based, for-profit, and nonprofit service providers who utilize several federal, state and
local resources in providing services for homeless persons. The County and its cities,
including the City of Temecula, also provide resources for services that assist the
homeless and those at risk of becoming homeless. The nonprofit and faith-based
community plays a key role in the current CoC system. Hundreds of agencies
throughout the County provide programs ranging from feeding the homeless on the
street to creating permanent supportive housing opportunities. These services are
available to homeless families with children as well as single men and women. The
nonprofit and faith-based community also serves special needs populations, such as
victims of domestic violence, veterans, persons with disabilities and unaccompanied
youth.
Describe consultation with the Continuum(s) of Care that serves the
jurisdiction's area in determining how to allocate ESG funds, develop
performance standards and evaluate outcomes, and develop funding,
policies and procedures for the administration of HMIS
The City is not a direct recipient of ESG funding. However, it is a participating
jurisdiction in the COC and works closely with the homeless system to create funding
policies and procedures for ESG.
2. Describe Agencies, groups, organizations, and others who
participated in the process and describe the jurisdictions consultations
with housing, social service agencies and other entities
1 Agency/Group/Organization Fund Development
Agency/Group/Organization Type
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 9
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
2 Agency/Group/Organization Amcal Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
3 Agency/Group/Organization Assistance League of Temecula
Valley
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 10
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
4 Agency/Group/Organization Atria Senior Living
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
5 Agency/Group/Organization Autism Society Inland Empire
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Health
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
6 Agency/Group/Organization Boys and Girls Club of Southwest
County
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Children
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 11
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
7 Agency/Group/Organization Bridge Housing
Agency/Group/Organization Type Assisted Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
8 Agency/Group/Organization Building Industry Association
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 12
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
9 Agency/Group/Organization California Apartment Association
Inland Empire
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 13
10 Agency/Group/Organization California State University San
Marcos, Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
11 Agency/Group/Organization Canine Support Teams
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
12 Agency/Group/Organization Catholic Charities
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Social Services
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 14
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
13 Agency/Group/Organization Chemo Buddies 4 Life
Agency/Group/Organization Type Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
14 Agency/Group/Organization Circle of Care Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 15
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
15 Agency/Group/Organization City of Murrieta
Agency/Group/Organization Type Adjacent City
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
16 Agency/Group/Organization CityNet
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless provider
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 16
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
17 Agency/Group/Organization City of Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type City; Community Services
Commission; Planning Commission;
Public Safety Traffic Commission;
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 17
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
18 Agency/Group/Organization Coachella Valley Housing Coalition
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
19 Agency/Group/Organization Community Access Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 18
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
20 Agency/Group/Organization Community Mission of Hope
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless provider
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
21 Agency/Group/Organization Comprehensive Autism Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services- Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 19
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
22 Agency/Group/Organization County of Riverside Behavioral
Health Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type Mental Health Agency/Facility
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
23 Agency/Group/Organization County of Riverside Economic
Development Agency
Agency/Group/Organization Type Local Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 20
24 Agency/Group/Organization County of Riverside Health
Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type Health Services, Childhood Lead
Poisoning Prevention Program
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
25 Agency/Group/Organization Court Appointed Special Advocate of
Riverside County
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Unaccompanied Youth
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
26 Agency/Group/Organization Desert AIDS
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-HIV/AIDS
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 21
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
27 Agency/Group/Organization Economic Development of
Southwest California
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Employment
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
28 Agency/Group/Organization Fair Housing Counsel of Riverside
County, Inc.
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Fair Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 22
29 Agency/Group/Organization Foothill AIDS
Agency/Group/Organization Type AIDS
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
30 Agency/Group/Organization Go Bananas
Agency/Group/Organization Type Supporting families with special
needs
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
31 Agency/Group/Organization GRID Alternatives
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 23
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
32 Agency/Group/Organization Habitat for Humanity Inland Valley
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
33 Agency/Group/Organization Hitzke Consulting
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 24
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
34 Agency/Group/Organization Hospice of the Valleys
Agency/Group/Organization Type Healthcare
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
35 Agency/Group/Organization Housing Authority of the County of
Riverside
Agency/Group/Organization Type PHA
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 25
36 Agency/Group/Organization Iglesia Bautista del Valle de
Temecula
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
37 Agency/Group/Organization Inland Regional Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Disabilities
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
38 Agency/Group/Organization John Stewart Company
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable Housing
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 26
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
39 Agency/Group/Organization Ken Follis
Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Community
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
40 Agency/Group/Organization League of Women Voters
Agency/Group/Organization Type Non profit
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 27
41 Agency/Group/Organization Love of Christ Fellowship Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
42 Agency/Group/Organization Michelle's Place
Agency/Group/Organization Type Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
43 Agency/Group/Organization Mission Village Apartments
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 28
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
44 Agency/Group/Organization Mt San Jacinto College
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
45 Agency/Group/Organization Nu-Way International Christian
Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
46 Agency/Group/Organization Our Nicholas Foundation
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Persons with Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 29
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
47 Agency/Group/Organization Path of Life Ministries
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Homeless
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
48 Agency/Group/Organization Pechanga Casino
Agency/Group/Organization Type Employer
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 30
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
49 Agency/Group/Organization Project Touch
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless provider
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
50 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho California Water District
Agency/Group/Organization Type Water District/Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 31
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
51 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Community Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
52 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho Damacitas
Agency/Group/Organization Type Foster Youth
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
53 Agency/Group/Organization Rancho en Espanol
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Faith Based
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 32
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
54 Agency/Group/Organization Riverbank Village Apartments
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Rental Property
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
55 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Victims of Domestic
Violence
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 33
56 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside City and County CoC
Agency/Group/Organization Type Continuum of Care
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
TEMECULA 2022-2026
CONSOLIDATED PLAN 33
57 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Office on Aging
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Senior services
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
58 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Sheriff
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Public Safety
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
59 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside Transit Agency
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Transportation
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 34
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
60 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Veterans Services
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services - Homeless Veterans
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
61 Agency/Group/Organization Rose Again Foundation
Agency/Group/Organization Type Child Welfare Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 35
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
62 Agency/Group/Organization SAFE Alternatives for Everyone
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Victims of Domestic
Violence
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
63 Agency/Group/Organization Safety Research Associates, Inc
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Special needs and senior
housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
64 Agency/Group/Organization Senior Care Referral Specialists
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Seniors
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 36
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
65 Agency/Group/Organization Solari Enterprises
Agency/Group/Organization Type Affordable Property Management
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
66 Agency/Group/Organization Southern California Council of
Governments
Agency/Group/Organization Type State Government
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 37
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
67 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Riverside County
Association of Realtors
Agency/Group/Organization Type Housing
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 38
68 Agency/Group/Organization Southwest Workforce Development
Center
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Employment
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
69 Agency/Group/Organization St. Catherine's Catholic Church
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Faith Based
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
70 Agency/Group/Organization State Council on Developmental
Disabilities
Agency/Group/Organization Type Public Funded Institution
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 39
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
71 Agency/Group/Organization State of California Department of
Housing and Community
Development
Agency/Group/Organization Type State Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
72 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Murrieta Rescue Mission
Agency/Group/Organization Type Homeless provider
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 40
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
73 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Chamber of
Commerce
Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Community
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
74 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Historical Society
Agency/Group/Organization Type Planning Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 41
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
75 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Unified School
District
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services-Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
76 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Union School
District Adult Transition Program
Agency/Group/Organization Type Services Education
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 42
77 Agency/Group/Organization Temecula Valley Winegrowers
Association
Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Leader
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
78 Agency/Group/Organization The Center for Life Change
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Addictive Recovery
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
79 Agency/Group/Organization Civic Leader
Agency/Group/Organization Type Community Services Commission
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 43
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
80 Agency/Group/Organization U.S. Vets Initiative
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Veterans Services
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
81 Agency/Group/Organization VA Loma Linda Healthcare
Agency/Group/Organization Type Health Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Non-Homeless Special Needs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 44
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
82 Agency/Group/Organization Smart Moms
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Community Based
Organization
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
83 Agency/Group/Organization Voice of Children
Agency/Group/Organization Type Youth Services
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
84 Agency/Group/Organization Wells Fargo
Agency/Group/Organization Type Business Community
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 45
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
85 Agency/Group/Organization Western Riverside Council of
Governments
Agency/Group/Organization Type Other-Regional Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
86 Agency/Group/Organization Birth Choice
Agency/Group/Organization Type
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 46
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
87 Agency/Group/Organization CA Emerging Technology Fund
(CETF)
Agency/Group/Organization Type Organizations engaged in narrowing
the digital divide
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
88 Agency/Group/Organization Spectrum Internet Provider
Agency/Group/Organization Type Broadband ISP
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Economic Development
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 47
89 Agency/Group/Organization FEMA
Agency/Group/Organization Type Emergency Management Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
90 Agency/Group/Organization HUD Los Angeles Field Office
Agency/Group/Organization Type Federal Government
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Housing Need Assessment
Lead-based Paint Strategy
Public Housing Needs
Homelessness Strategy
Homeless Needs - Chronically
homeless
Homeless Needs - Families with
children
Homelessness Needs - Veterans
Homelessness Needs -
Unaccompanied youth
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Economic Development
Market Analysis
Anti-poverty Strategy
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 48
91 Agency/Group/Organization Riverside County Emergency
Management Department
Agency/Group/Organization Type Floodplain Management Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
92 Agency/Group/Organization BLM California Desert District
Agency/Group/Organization Type Public Land Agency
What section of the Plan was
addressed by Consultation?
Non-Homeless Special Needs
Market Analysis
How was the
Agency/Group/Organization
consulted and what are the
anticipated outcomes of the
consultation or areas for improved
coordination?
To obtain a comprehensive
assessment of the needs and
priorities within the community, the
Consolidated Plan process included
consultation with residents, service
providers and selected departments.
Engagement was conducted
through surveys, community
meetings and interviews.
Table 3– Agencies, groups, organizations who participated
Identify any Agency Types not consulted and provide rationale for not
consulting
The City maintains a list of agencies, organizations and other stakeholders that have
expressed an interest in City’s CDBG program and invited representatives from each
entity to participate at multiple points in the planning process. All agencies were
strongly encouraged to attend meetings and participate in surveys.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 49
Other local/regional/state/federal planning efforts considered when
preparing the Plan
Name of Plan Lead Organization How do the goals of your
Strategic Plan overlap with the
goals of each plan?
Continuum of Care Continuum of Care of
Riverside County
Strategic Plan goals are
consistent with Ten Year Strategy
to End Homelessness
Housing Elements City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are
consistent with Housing Element
policies and goals
Assessment of Fair
Housing
City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are consistent
with Assessment of Fair Housing
2005 General Plan
Update
City of Temecula Strategic Plan goals are consistent
with the General Plan policies and
goals
2030 Quality of Life
Management Plan
(QLMP)
P) City of Temecula
Strategic Plan goals are consistent
with the QLMP policies and goals
Table 4– Other local / regional / federal planning efforts
Describe cooperation and coordination with other public entities,
including the State and any adjacent units of general local government, in
the implementation of the Consolidated Plan (91.215(l))
In the development of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan, the City afforded the
following public entities with the opportunity to provide input on the Consolidated
Plan concerning the future implementation of project to address the Strategic Plan
goals identified in section SP-45 of the Consolidated Plan:
• Housing Authority of the County of Riverside
• Regional Homeless Alliance
• Riverside County Continuum of Care
• Riverside County Department of Social Services
• Riverside County Office on Aging
• Riverside County Economic Development Agency
• Riverside County Health Department
• Riverside County Veterans Services
• Riverside County Behavioral Health Department
• Riverside County Sheriff’s Department
• Riverside Transit Agency
• Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 50
• Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG)
• State of California Department of Housing and Community Development
• State of California Department of Employment Development Department
• State of California Council on Developmental Disabilities
• Southwest Workforce Development Center
• Inland Regional Center
• U.S. Veterans Administration
• Temecula Valley Unified School District
• Mt. St. Jacinto College
• City of Murrieta
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 51
PR-15 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION - 91.105, 91.115, 91.200(C)
AND 91.300(C)
1. Summary of citizen participation process/Efforts made to broaden
citizen participation
Summarize citizen participation process and how it impacted goal setting
In preparation for the Consolidated Plan the City followed the established processes
of the Citizen Participation Plan to ensure broad community engagement. At each
step the City worked to ensure low- and moderate-income residents, members of
minority groups, agencies involved in the provision of services to these populations,
and others who are directly impacted by the programs and activities supported by
the Consolidated Plan programs had the opportunity to be actively involved. The
Citizen Participation Plan, Consolidated Plan, Action Plan, Consolidated Annual
Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and the Assessment of Fair Housing are
posted on the City website at: https://temeculaca.gov/430/Citizen-Participation and a
hard copy will be available for review in the City Community Development
Department for 30 days from March 28 to April 26, 2022.
To assist in identification of priority needs citizens were engaged through community
meetings, surveys, public hearings, and individual meetings. Participants received
extensive information about the Consolidated Plan, citizen participation process, HUD
requirements for an entitlement City, the amount of funding the City anticipates
receiving and how those funds can be used by the City. Residents were given the
opportunity to provide City staff with their input on the prioritization of community
needs. Each of these efforts, including review of HUD Data and relevant policy
documents, assisted the City in its goal setting efforts.
Publicly noticed meetings were held at different stages in the development of the
Consolidated Plan. Early in the planning process two community meetings were held
on October 27, 2021, at 8 am and 6 pm in person at the Temecula Community Center
located at 28816 Pujol Street. Later in the planning process two additional meeting
were held virtually via Zoom at 9 am and 5 pm. No written comments were received.
On October 27, 2021, the City opened it resident survey to afford citizens the greatest
opportunity to provide input on housing and community development needs of the
City. The questionnaire polled respondents about the level of need in their
neighborhoods for various types of improvements which could potentially be
addressed using CDBG funds. The electronic survey link was published in a
newspaper of general circulation, on the City’s website and across its soc ial media
platforms. Hard copies of the survey were available at the Community Development
Department. The resident survey received 126 responses and the stakeholder survey
received eight responses. A stakeholder survey of organizations serving Temecula
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 52
residents as well as those addressing regional needs was open from January 24 to 28,
2022. This survey received eight responses.
On February 22, 2022, the City of Temecula Finance Subcommittee conducted a
public meeting to consider the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan strategies and goals and
the CDBG funding recommendations for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. The Finance
Subcommittee performs in an advisory capacity to City staff and to the City Council
concerning planning, implementing, and assessing CDBG programs and activities.
On March 27, 2022, the City published a notice in The Press-Enterprise newspaper
providing the public a 30-day notice to review and comment on the draft 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan and draft 2022-2023 Action Plan.
Citizen Participation Outreach
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
1 Newspaper
Ad
Non-
targeted/
broad
community
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify
other
language:
Spanish and
Tagalog
Published
November 15, 2021,
The Press-
Enterprise
announcing two
Community
Meetings to
receive input on
the preparation of
the City's 2022-
2026 Consolidated
Plan and the 2022-
2023 Action Plan.
No comments
were received.
No
comments
were
received.
N/A
2 Public
Meeting
Non-
targeted/
broad
community
Publicly noticed
Community
Meeting on
October 27, 2021, at
8:00 a.m. and 6:00
p.m. at the
Temecula
Community
Center, 28816 Pujol
Street, Temecula,
CA.
Residents in
attendance
received a
presentation on
the Consolidated
Plan and
discussed housing
and community
development
needs with City
Staff.
No
comments
were
received.
N/A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 53
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
4 Internet
Outreach
Non-
targeted/br
oad
community
The Resident
Survey was
available online
and in paper
format at the
Community
Development
Department from
November 15 to
February 3, 2022.
The City advised
residents and
stakeholders of the
availability of the
survey via
newspaper of
general circulation,
email, posting on
the City website,
Facebook, Twitter,
announcements at
City Council
meetings, and
during the
Community
Meetings.
The purpose of the
survey was to
allow all residents
the opportunity to
provide their
assessment of the
level of need in
Temecula for a
variety of housing,
community, and
economic
development
activities.
In total, 126
residents
completed the
survey. A summary
of all survey
responses is
provided in
Appendix B.
All survey
responses
were
accepted.
http
s://fo
rms.
offic
e.co
m/r/
8DE
MNr
H5h
L
5 Newspaper
Ad
Non-
targeted/
broad
community
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify
other
language:
Spanish and
Tagalog
Published
December 8, 2021,
in The Press-
Enterprise
announcing
Community
Meeting to receive
input on the
preparation of the
City's 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan
and the 2022-2023
Action Plan.
No public
comments were
received.
No public
comments
were
received.
N/A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 54
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
6 Public
Meeting
Non-
targeted/br
oad
community
Publicly noticed
virtual Community
Meeting was held
on December 17,
2021, at 9:00 a.m.
and 5:00 p.m. via
Zoom
No public
comments were
received.
No public
comments
were
received.
N/A
7 Newspaper
Ad
Non-
targeted/
broad
community
English
Speaking
Non-English
Speaking -
Specify
other
language:
Spanish and
Tagalog
Newspaper ad
published on
March 28, 2022, in
The Press-
Enterprise
announcing the
availability of the
draft 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan,
draft 2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, draft
Temecula
Assessment of Fair
Housing, and
Citizen
Participation Plan
for a 30-day public
review and
comment period
to include a public
hearing before the
Temecula City
Council on April 26,
2022.
No public
comments were
received.
No public
comments
were
received.
N/A
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 55
Mode of
Outreach
Target of
Outreach
Summary of
response/
attendance
Summary of
Comments
received
Summary
of
comments
not
accepted
and
reasons
URL
8 Public
Hearing
Non-
targeted/br
oad
community
Public hearing
before the
Temecula City
Council on April 26,
2022, to receive
comments on the
draft 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan,
draft 2022-2023
Annual Action
Plan, draft
Temecula
Assessment of Fair
Housing, and draft
Citizen
Participation Plan
prior to adoption
and submission to
HUD.
To be determined. To be
determined
N/A
Table 5– Citizen Participation Outreach
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 56
Needs Assessment
NA-05 OVERVIEW
Needs Assessment Overview
The Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment examines housing, homelessness,
non-homeless special needs, and non-housing community development
needs. The housing needs assessment section evaluates household income,
tenure (renter or owner), housing cost as a function of household income,
disproportionate need amongst racial and ethnic groups and public housing
needs. The homeless needs assessment examines the sheltered and
unsheltered homeless population in Riverside County to inform the City’s
strategy to address homelessness during the next five years. The non-
homeless special needs assessment section evaluates the needs of people who
are not homeless, but due to various reasons need services. This population
includes elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, and
physically disabled persons, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions,
persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of human trafficking, persons with
posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and victims of domestic violence. The
non-housing community development needs assessment section discusses
the need for public facilities, public infrastructure improvements and public
services to benefit low- and moderate-income residents.
Methodology
To assess community needs, the City examined data, held community
meetings, conducted a survey of residents and stakeholders, and consulted
with experts and local stakeholders. The Needs Assessment primarily relies on
the following sources of data:
• American Community Survey (ACS), (2013-2017, 5-year estimates)
• Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) (2013-2017, 5-year
estimates)
• 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count
The 2013-2017 ACS 5-year estimates and the 2013-2017, 5-year estimates were
the most recent available complete datasets supplied through the United
States Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Con Planning
Suite planning framework.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 57
Consolidated Plan Survey for Residents and Stakeholders
Temecula residents and stakeholders had the opportunity to respond to the
2022-2026 Consolidated Plan survey to rate the need and/or to identify highest
priority need for public facilities, infrastructure, and services, housing facilities
and services, business services. The survey also provided insight into internet
access, cost, type, and speed as well as disaster preparedness and experiences
of discrimination in housing. The tabulation of survey results from the 126
Temecula residents and seven community stakeholders who responded to the
survey are integrated throughout the Needs Assessment (NA) and Market
Assessment (MA) of Consolidated Plan and can be found in the following
sections:
• Housing facility and service results – NA-10 Housing Needs Assessment,
• Public facility, infrastructure, and service results – NA-50 Non-Housing
and Community Development Needs,
• Discrimination in housing results – MA-40 Barriers to Affordable
Housing,
• Business service results – MA-45,
• Internet access, cost, type, and speed – MA-60 Broadband Needs of
Housing Occupied by Low- and Moderate-Income Households, and
• Disaster preparedness results – MA-65 Hazard Mitigation.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 58
NA-10 HOUSING NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Summary of Housing Needs
According to ACS data in Table 6, the City’s population grew by 18 percent
during the period between 2009 and 2017, increasing in number from 93,474
to 110,720 people. During this time, the number of households increased by 16
percent from 29,081 to 33,645 and the median household income increased
from $79,640 to $87,115. According to the 2017 data, approximately 31 percent
of all households in Temecula earn less than 100 percent of Area Median
Income (AMI) and 23 percent of all households earn less than 80 percent of
AMI.
Table 7 presents the number of different household types in the City for
different levels of income. Small family households consist of two -to-four
family members, while large family households have five or more persons. The
income levels are divided by different AMI levels corresponding with HUD
income definitions as follows:
• 0-30 percent AMI: extremely low-income – six percent of all households;
• 30-50 percent AMI: low-income – seven percent of all households;
• 50-80 percent AMI: moderate-income – 10 percent of all households;
• 80-100 percent AMI: medium-income – eight percent of all households;
and
• Greater than 100 percent AMI: upper-income – 69 percent of all
households.
Figure 1
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 59
The most common household type in Temecula is small family, representing
about 54 percent of all households in the City. From 16 to 29 percent of specific
household types earn less than 80 percent AMI, with the highest rates of
occurrence among households with one or more children 6 years of age or
younger or 62 years of age or older.
Figure 2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Tables 8 and 9 delve into the tenure type and income range of households
earning less than 100 percent of AMI and experiencing housing problems.
These tables demonstrate that housing cost burden is the greatest housing
problem across renter and owner households. Renter households are most
impacted by severe housing problems. Over 56 percent of the 7,600
households earning 0-80 percent AMI experience a housing cost burden over
50 percent of income (Table 8). The majority, 66 percent, of the 4,950
households earning 0-80% AMI with one or more severe housing problem are
renters (Table 9). HUD defines four different housing problems as:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped
water, a range or stove, or a refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped
water, a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
3. Overcrowding / severe overcrowding: A household is overcrowded if
there are more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches,
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 60
foyers, halls, or half-rooms. A household is considered severely
overcrowded if there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Cost burden / severe cost burden: A household is considered cost
burdened if the household pays more than 30 percent of its total gross
income for housing costs. A household is considered severely cost
burdened if the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income
for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the
tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage, taxes,
insurance, and utilities.
Table 12 shows that a relatively low percentage (less than three percent) of
Temecula’s households earning less than 100 percent of AMI are overcrowded.
Demographics Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year: 2017 % Change
Population 93,474 110,720 18%
Households 29,081 33,645 16%
Median Income $79,640.00 $87,115.00 9%
Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment Demographics
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year)
Number of Households Table
0-30%
AMI
>30-50%
AMI
>50-80%
AMI
>80-100%
AMI
>100%
AMI
Total Households 1,880 2,210 3,510 2,765 23,280
Small Family Households
(2 – 4 people) 860 1,135 1,415 1,430 13,470
Large Family Households
(5 or more people) 115 150 525 385 3,645
Household contains at least
one person 62-74 years of age 370 335 710 470 4,560
Household contains at least
one-person age 75 or older 224 320 665 200 1,245
Households with one or more
children 6 years old or
younger
299 455 595 480 4,400
Table 7 - Total Households Table
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 61
Housing Needs Summary Tables
1. Housing Problems (Households with one of the listed needs)
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Substandard
Housing -
Lacking
complete
plumbing or
kitchen facilities
25 55 70 0 150 0 0 0 0 0
Severely
Overcrowded -
With >1.51 people
per room (and
complete
kitchen and
plumbing)
0 15 50 35 100 0 4 0 0 4
Overcrowded -
With 1.01-1.5
people per room
(and none of the
above problems)
50 115 175 20 360 50 0 15 65 130
Housing cost
burden greater
than 50% of
income (and
none of the
above problems)
975 1,000 730 150 2,855 395 455 770 215 1,835
Housing cost
burden greater
than 30% of
income (and
none of the
above problems)
65 175 375 750 1,365 65 95 430 760 1,350
Zero/negative
Income (and
none of the
above problems)
130 0 0 0 130 50 0 0 0 50
Table 8 – Housing Problems Table
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 62
2. Housing Problems 2 (Households with one or more Severe Housing
Problems: Lacks kitchen or complete plumbing, severe overcrowding, severe
cost burden)
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Having 1 or more
of four housing
problems
1,050 1,190 1,020 210 3,470 440 465 785 280 1,970
Having none of
four housing
problems
135 315 585 1,110 2,145 70 240 1,120 1,165 2,595
Household has
negative income,
but none of the
other housing
problems
130 0 0 0 130 50 0 0 0 50
Table 9 – Housing Problems 2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
3. Cost Burden > 30%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related 665 875 540 2,070 145 195 515 855
Large
Related 100 90 330 520 15 60 150 225
Elderly 295 150 185 630 200 275 465 940
Other 60 185 330 575 145 30 80 255
Total need by
income 1,110 1,300 1,385 3,795 505 560 1,210 2,275
Table 10 – Cost Burden > 30%
Data Source: 2013-2015 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 63
4. Cost Burden > 50%
Renter Owner
0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total 0-30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Small Related (2
to 4 people) 605 745 360 1,710 110 185 380 675
Large Related (5
or more people) 100 70 110 280 15 60 110 185
Elderly 285 140 155 580 170 190 205 565
Other 60 145 190 395 145 30 80 255
Total need by
income 1,050 1,100 815 2,965 440 465 775 1,680
Table 11 – Cost Burden > 50%
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
5. Crowding (More than one person per room)
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS
Single family
households 50 85 175 55 365 50 4 15 35 104
Multiple,
unrelated
family
households
0 0 55 0 55 0 0 0 30 30
Other, non-
family
households
0 45 0 0 45 0 0 0 0 0
Total need by
income 50 130 230 55 465 50 4 15 65 134
Table 12 – Crowding Information – 1/2
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 64
Renter Owner
0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total 0-
30%
AMI
>30-
50%
AMI
>50-
80%
AMI
>80-
100%
AMI
Total
Households
with children
6 years of age
or younger
present
229 360 365 225 1,179 70 95 230 255 650
Table 13 – Households with children
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 65
Figure 3: Extremely Low-Income Households with Severe Cost Burden
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 66
Figure 4: Low-Income Households with Severe Cost Burden
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 67
Figure 5: Moderate-Income Households with Severe Cost Burden
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 68
Figure 6: Resident Survey, Level of need for Housing Facilities
The largest number respondents believe there is a high and moderate need
for affordable rental housing, senior housing, and housing for persons with
disabilities. Stakeholders agree the greatest need for housing is for the disables
and veterans.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 69
Figure 7: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Housing Facility
When asked to select one type of housing facility as the highest priority for the
community the top three were affordable rental housing, single family
housing, and senior housing.
Describe the number and type of single person households in need of
housing assistance.
According to ACS 2017, five-year estimates (table B25009), there are 5,029 single
person households in the City, accounting for about 15 percent of the City’s
households. Approximately five percent of single householders are over 65 years of
age, according to the ACS 2017, five-year estimates (table S1101), indicating
approximately 95 percent of single person households are ages 18-64. Of the single
person households, nearly 55 percent are homeowners and 45 percent are renters.
Taken together single person and small family households account for nearly 70
percent of the City’s households.
According to Tables 10 and 11, 830 and 650 “other” households, respectively earn less
than 80 percent of AMI are housing cost burdened at a rate of 30% and 50% of income.
The “other” category includes single person households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 70
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance
who are disabled or victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual
assault, and stalking.
Nationwide, domestic violence, assault, and stalking are underreported according to
the U.S. Department of Justice. Criminal Victimization, 2019, reports only 58 percent
of all domestic violence events were reported to the police. The State of California
Department of Justice maintains statistics on domestic violence calls to local law
enforcement statewide by jurisdiction (openjustice.doj.ca.gov). In 2020, the Temecula
Police Department responded to a total of 213 calls related to domestic violence. Of
these calls for assistance:
• 193 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon
• 20 calls involved a weapon
o 0 domestic incidents involved a firearm
o 0 domestic incidents involved a knife or cutting instruments
o 3 domestic incidents involved other dangerous weapons
o 17 domestic incidents involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands)
o 0 cases involved strangulation
o 0 cases involved suffocation
It is difficult to estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance
based on the data provided by state’s Open Justice program. In households were
physical violence occurred, it is possible that at least one member, possibly more
include children, will need to relocate within the next five years to escape recurring
violence.
Furthermore, according to the Riverside County Continuum of Care’s 2020 Point in
Time Count, 212 people experiencing homelessness reported being victims of
domestic violence, and most those people (177) were unsheltered.
Victims of domestic violence suffer in many ways including economically which
impacts access to safe and affordable permanent housing. Nationally, statewide, and
in Temecula there is need for emergency shelter and affordable permanent housing.
What are the most common housing problems?
The most common housing problem in the City is cost burden, which affects 73
percent of households earning less than 80 percent of AMI, including 615 renter
households and 590 owner households who pay more than 30 percent of their
monthly gross income for housing costs. Within the group of cost burdened
households, 4,325 are severely cost burdened households paying more than 50
percent of their monthly gross income for housing costs, including 2,705 renter
households and 1,620 owner households. While severe housing cost burden is
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 71
experienced with similar frequency across renter and owner households, renter
households bear the brunt of severe housing cost burden as well as the other housing
problems.
Figure 8
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
The second most common housing problem in the City is housing overcrowding,
which affects 474 low- and moderate-income Temecula households. Renter
households make up 85 percent of the low- and moderate-income households who
have more than 1.01 people per room, excluding bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or
half-rooms.
Are any populations/household types more affected than others by these
problems?
Renters earning less than 80 percent of AMI are most impacted by all housing
problems. Only renter households live with substandard housing and severe
overcrowding (Table 8), and more than two times as many renter households as
owner households have less than or equal to zero income (Table 9).
On an absolute basis, small related, elderly, and other households earning 80 percent
of AMI are most impacted by 30 percent and 50 percent housing cost burdens as
summarized below:
• 30 percent cost burdened households
o Small related 2,925
o Elderly 1,570
o Other 830
• 50 percent cost burdened households
o Small related 2,385
o Elderly 1,145
o Other 650
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 72
Small and large related renter households earning 80 percent of AMI and
experiencing housing cost burdens of 30 percent and 50 percent of AMI, relative to
their groups, are impacted at concerning rates. According to Table 10, over 60 percent
of low- and moderate-income small and large renter households experience a
housing cost burden greater than 30 percent of AMI. According to Table 11, 50 percent
of low- and moderate-income small renter households are housing cost burdened
greater than 50 percent of AMI.
Low- and moderate-income, single family renter households are most impacted by
overcrowded housing conditions comprising 310 or 52 percent of the 410 total
households affected by this housing problem in the same income category (Table 12).
Describe the characteristics and needs of Low-income individuals and
families with children (especially extremely low-income) who are currently
housed but are at imminent risk of either residing in shelters or becoming
unsheltered 91.205(c)/91.305(c)). Also discuss the needs of formerly
homeless families and individuals who are receiving rapid re-housing
assistance and are nearing the termination of that assistance
According to 2014-2018 CHAS data, there are 1,395 households earning 0-80 percent
of AMI, in Temecula with children six years of age or younger. Of those households,
970 are renters and 425 are homeowners. Approximately 23 percent of the households
with children six years of age or younger earn less than or equal to 80 percent of AMI.
Of particular concern are the 750 extremely low-income households with children six
years of age or younger, of which 590 are renters at risk of becoming homeless.
According to kidsdata.org, from 2014-2018, 8.4 percent of Temecula children, ages 0-
17, lived in crowded households. However, for the purposes of this analysis, the City
considers overcrowding to be a secondary statistic to severe housing cost burden
within the 0-30 percent of AMI extremely low-income bracket.
Across cost burdened households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, renter households are
more impacted than owner households, and small related and elderly households are
more impacted than large related or other household types. Within these groups, the
risk of experiencing homelessness increases as AMI decreases. Among households
earning 0-50 percent of AMI small, related renter household are more than four times
as likely as small, related owner households to be 30 or 50 percent cost burdened
(Tables 10 & 11). The number of elderly households earning less than or equal to 50
percent of AMI who are cost burdened varies little based on housing tenure (Tables 10
& 11). Across households earning 0-50 percent AMI, 64 to 77 percent of small and large,
renter households, are cost burdened (Tables 10 and 11).
According to Table seven, 754 (18 percent) of the 4,090 households earning less than
50 percent of AMI have one or more children six years old or younger.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 73
Figure 9
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Figure 10
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
As described in the Market Analysis, rental housing costs have risen steadily over the
past five years – creating more pressure on extremely low-income households.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, the median rent for a one-bedroom
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 74
apartment rose from $1,476 in October 2017 to $2,109 in October 2021, an increase of
43 percent. This data is supported by research conducted for the City’s 2021-2029
Housing Element, which based on analysis of Zillow.com and Apartments.com found
rents for 1-bedroom units ranged from $1,345 to $2,850 in May 2021. Large increases,
but not as great as for one-bedroom apartments, have occurred for two- and three-
bedroom units. As rental prices continue to rise in Temecula, the pressure on
extremely low-income households will continue to increase.
Rapid rehousing programs may help these homeless individuals or families but, near
the termination of assistance, finding replacement housing is difficult for the same
reasons it was difficult before becoming homeless: cost and an eviction record.
Unless a housing unit is within a subsidized development, formerly homeless families
and individuals receiving rapid re-housing assistance nearing termination face
considerable uncertainty with respect to their monthly housing costs and ability to
remain housed at the end of the assistance contract.
If a jurisdiction provides estimates of the at -risk population(s), it should
also include a description of the operational definition of the at-risk group
and the methodology used to generate the estimates:
The assessment of at-risk populations described in the foregoing paragraphs is based
on ACS and CHAS data in the Consolidated Plan using HUD definitions for household
types and housing problems, supplemented by available local data for certain groups
specified by HUD, such as households with children and victims of domestic violence,
dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking.
Specify particular housing characteristics that have been linked with
instability and an increased risk of homelessness
According to Table 11, there are 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent
of AMI that are severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income
for housing costs. Of these households:
• 1,350 are small, related households with four or fewer members
• 170 are large, related households with five or more members
• 425 are elderly households with one or more members over the age of 62
• 205 are other households
These extremely low- and low-income households are considered the most at risk of
becoming homeless.
Discussion
Evaluation of ACS and CHAS data in Table 6 - Housing Needs Assessment
Demographics through Table 13 – Households with children above, the highest
priority housing need exists for the development of additional rental housing units
affordable to low- and moderate-income households. This is supported by residents’
sentiment as seen in figures 6 and 7, indicating the need for affordable rental housing
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 75
is the greatest and highest priority in the City. According to Table 10 – Cost Burden >
30% 6,070 of households earning 0-80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning
those households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing costs. According
to Table 11 – Cost Burden > 50%, 4,645 of cost burdened households are severely cost
burdened— meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing costs. Of
the 4,645 severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are renters. Of those severely cost
burdened renter households, 2,150 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and
are considered the most at risk of becoming homeless.
The Strategic Plan addresses this priority need through the implementation of an
affordable housing development goal. To the greatest extent feasible, assistance
should be directed toward the development of units affordable to severely cost
burdened renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI, and the subset of
1,050 extremely low-income renter households. Of these extremely low-income renter
households, 605 are small, related households and 100 are elderly households the
most at risk of homelessness.
The development of additional affordable rental housing will also address
overcrowding — the second most prevalent housing problem — by increasing the
supply of housing units that are appropriately sized to accommodate small families
and single person households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 76
NA-15 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
HOUSING PROBLEMS
Introduction
Sections NA-15, NA-20, and NA-25 of the Needs Assessment examine housing
problems experienced by racial or ethnic groups and identifies when a need is
experienced at a disproportionately greater frequency. A disproportionately greater
need exists when members of a racial or ethnic group in a certain income range
experience housing problems at a greater rate (10 percentage points or more) than
the rate of housing problems experienced by all households within that income level.
For example, when evaluating 0-30 percent of AMI households, if 50 percent of the
households experience a housing problem, but 60 percent or more of households
which identify as a particular racial or ethnic group of experience housing problems,
that racial or ethnic group has a disproportionately greater need.
The housing problems identified in Tables 14-17 below are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a
range or stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water,
a flush toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than
1.01 people per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays
more than 30 percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters,
housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing
costs include mortgage payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the 2013-2017 ACS (Table DP05), most Temecula residents identify White,
followed by Asian, Some other race, Two or more races, Black or African American,
American Indian and Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander,
and 72 percent of Temecula residents do not identify as Hispanic or Latino.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 77
Figure 11
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Figure 12
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 78
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,620 74 180
White 860 64 70
Black / African American 170 0 0
Asian 110 10 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 430 0 0
Table 14 - Disproportionally Greater Need 0 - 30% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,920 285 0
White 110 175 0
Black / African American 105 0 0
Asian 100 70 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 55 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 510 35 0
Table 15 - Disproportionally Greater Need 30 - 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 79
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2610 900 0
White 1410 605 0
Black / African American 70 0 0
Asian 260 90 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 20 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 790 185 0
Table 16 - Disproportionally Greater Need 50 - 80% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Housing Problems
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 2,000 765 0
White 1400 410 0
Black / African American 100 35 0
Asian 105 95 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 10 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 375 195 0
Table 17 - Disproportionally Greater Need 80 - 100% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
The maps in Figure 13 to Figure 16 shown below illustrate the racial or ethnic
composition of the City by Census Tract as reported in the 2013-2017 American
Community Survey Estimates for those race and ethnicities that represent greater
than one percent of the City’s population.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 80
Figure 13: White alone (not Hispanic)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 81
Figure 14: Black / African American
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 82
Figure 15: Asian
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 83
Figure 16: Hispanic
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 84
Discussion
The method of calculating disproportionate need, sets different groups of
different sizes on equal footing, making it possible for any outsized impact on
groups to be identified. The analysis shows one or more racial and ethnic group
is disproportionately impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all
income levels. Furthermore, it shows 100 percent of Black/ African American’s
earning 0-80 percent of AMI; 100% of Hispanic households earning 0 -30
percent of AMI, 100% of American Indian, Alaska Natives earning 30-50 and 80-
100 percent of AMI have one or more of four housing problems.
Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have
a disproportionately greater level of one or more housing problem relative to
the percentage of all households in the given income category:
Figure 17
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
0-30 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• Hispanic households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 85
Figure 18
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30-50 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
Figure 19
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50-80 percent of AMI: Black/ African American households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 86
Figure 20
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
80-100 percent AMI:
• American Indian, and
• Alaska Native households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 87
NA-20 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED: SEVERE
HOUSING PROBLEMS
Introduction
Similar to the previous section, Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI
Table 21 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI provide data to determine if
disproportionate housing needs exist for any racial or ethnic group that
experiences severe housing problems, which are defined as:
1. Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven
and refrigerator.
2. Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running
water or modern toilets.
3. Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if
there are more than 1.5 people per room.
4. Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if
the household pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing
costs. For renters, housing costs include rent paid by the tenant plus
utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment, taxes,
insurance, and utilities.
0%-30% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems*
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none
of the other
housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1490 205 180
White 835 90 70
Black / African American 150 25 0
Asian 100 20 85
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 365 65 0
Table 18 – Severe Housing Problems 0 - 30% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 88
30%-50% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems*
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,655 555 0
White 960 325 0
Black / African American 105 0 0
Asian 95 80 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 55 0 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 405 140 0
Table 19 – Severe Housing Problems 30 - 50% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50%-80% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems*
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of the
four housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but
none of the
other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 1,805 1,705 0
White 885 1,135 0
Black / African American 70 0 0
Asian 155 185 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 20 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 610 365 0
Table 20 – Severe Housing Problems 50 - 80% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 89
80%-100% of Area Median Income
Severe Housing Problems*
Has one or
more of four
housing
problems
Has none of
the four
housing
problems
Household has
no/negative
income, but none of
the other housing
problems
Jurisdiction as a whole 490 2,275 0
White 275 1,540 0
Black / African American 25 110 0
Asian 30 170 0
American Indian, Alaska Native 0 10 0
Pacific Islander 0 0 0
Hispanic 160 415 0
Table 21 – Severe Housing Problems 80 - 100% AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Discussion
The method of calculating disproportionate need, sets different groups of
different sizes on equal footing, making it possible for any outsized impact on
groups to be identified. The analysis shows Pacific Islanders are not impacted
by severe housing problems and one or more racial or ethnic group is
disproportionately impacted by one of four severe housing problems in all
income levels except for extremely low-income households. Furthermore, it
shows 100 percent of Black/ African American’s earning 30-80 percent AMI;
100% of American Indian, Alaska Natives earning 30-50 have one or more of
four severe housing problems.
Based on this analysis, the following racial or ethnic groups were found to have
a disproportionately greater level of housing problems relative to the
percentage of all households in the given income category experiencing one
or more severe housing problems:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 90
Figure 21
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Within extremely low-income (0-30 percent of AMI) households the high
frequency of need is experienced similarly across White, Black/ African
American, and Hispanic households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 91
Figure 22
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
30-50 of percent AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian/ Alaska Native households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 92
Figure 23
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
50-80 of percent AMI:
• Black/ African American,
• American Indian, Alaska Native, and
• Hispanic households.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 93
Figure 24
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Within in high-income (80-100 percent of AMI) households those which
identify as Hispanic are disproportionately impacted.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 94
NA-25 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
HOUSING COST BURDENS
Introduction
HUD defines cost burden as the extent to which gross housing costs, including
utility costs, exceeds 30 percent of a given household’s gross income. A
household is considered severely cost burdened if gross housing costs,
including utility costs, exceeds 50 percent of a household’s gross income.
Housing Cost Burden <=30% 30-50% >50%
No / negative
income (not
computed)
Jurisdiction as a whole 21,025 7,065 5,380 175
White 13,480 4,235 3,080 70
Black / African American 990 415 320 0
Asian 1,960 370 390 85
American Indian, Alaska Native 115 30 75 0
Pacific Islander 25 0 0 0
Hispanic 3,990 1,870 1,360 0
Table 22 – Greater Need: Housing Cost Burdens AMI
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Discussion
Based on this analysis, 21 percent of Temecula households experience a cost
burden greater than 30-50 percent of income and 16 percent of households
experience a cost burden greater than 50 percent of income. The following
racial or ethnic group was found to have a disproportionately greater cost
burden relative to the percentage of all households experiencing a cost burden
or severe cost burden:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 95
Figure 25
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
No group is disproportionately impacted by a housing cost burden of 30 to 50
percent of income.
Figure 26
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Approximately 34 percent of American Indian, Alaska Native households are
severely cost burdened at a rate of greater than 50 percent of income.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 96
NA-30 DISPROPORTIONATELY GREATER NEED:
DISCUSSION
Are there any income categories in which a racial or ethnic group has
disproportionately greater need than the needs of that income category as
a whole?
The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportiona tely
greater level of housing problems relative to the percentage of all households
in the given income category experiencing housing problems:
0-30 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• Hispanic households.
30-50 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
50-80 percent of AMI: Black/ African American households.
80-100 percent of AMI: American Indian, Alaska Native households.
0-100 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
The following racial or ethnic groups were found to have a disproportionately
greater level of severe housing problems relative to the percentage of all
households in the given income category experiencing severe housing
problems:
30-50 percent of AMI:
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian/ Alaska Native households.
50-80 of percent AMI
• American Indian, Alaska Native,
• Black/ African American, and
• Hispanic households.
80-100 percent of AMI: Hispanic households.
0-100 percent AMI
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 97
• Black/ African American, and
• American Indian, Alaska Native households.
The following racial or ethnic groups had a disproportionately greater level of
housing cost burden: 37 percent of Temecula households experience a cost
burden greater than 30 percent of income, with 21 percent of households
experiencing a cost burden between 30 and 50 percent of income, and 16
percent of households experiencing severe cost burden greater than 50
percent of income. American Indian, Alaska Native households are
disproportionately impacted by housing cost burdens greater than 30 percent
and greater than 50 percent of income.
If they have needs not identified above, what are those needs?
No other housing needs for these specific racial or ethnic groups were
identified through consultation with stakeholders or through citizen
participation.
Are any of those racial or ethnic groups located in specific areas or
neighborhoods in your community?
Mapping of the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups and calculation of
the Dissimilarity Index show various racial/ethnic groups are not located in
specific areas or neighborhoods in Temecula. Maps of racial/ethnic distribution
from 1990, 2000 and 2010, created by HUD’s Affirmatively Furthering Fair
Housing Data Mapping tool, show the City has experienced high levels of
residential integration for the past few decades. The Dissimilarity Index
supports what is represented in the maps with values below 20.0 through 2010.
Temecula has low levels of segregation between White and Black, White, and
Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
While segregation in Temecula has increased over time as the population has
become less White and more Hispanic, Temecula is still a well-integrated
community compared to the state and metropolitan area. In 1990 the Hispanic
population represented 14.5 percent of the population, by 2017 it had increased
to 27.6 percent, according to 2013-2017 ACS data. The Hispanic/White
Dissimilarity Index increased from 0.6 in 1990 to 19.2 in 2017. For comparison,
the Hispanic/White dissimilarity index in the Riverside metropolitan area was
just below 40.
The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which two groups are evenly
distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing
residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values
between 0 and 39 generally indicate high integration (low segregation), values
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 98
between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate segregation, and values
between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 99
NA-35 PUBLIC HOUSING
Introduction
Public housing and other assisted housing programs are part of the efforts by
Riverside County to address the affordable housing needs of extremely low -
and very low-income families in Temecula. The Housing Authority of the
County of Riverside (HACR) oversees HUD public housing programs for
participating jurisdictions, including Temecula.
HACR administers the Section 8 Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8),
which provides rental assistance in all incorporated and unincorporated cities
and areas of Riverside County. HACR provides affordable housing for low-
income families, seniors, and disabled persons.
The mission of HACR is “to transform and promote healthy, thriving
communities, re-ignite hope and restore human dignity through the creation
and preservation of high quality and innovative housing and community
development programs which enhance the quality of life and revitalize
neighborhoods to foster self-sufficiency.”
There are 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula, 129 of which are Housing
Choice Vouchers and 55 of which are Project Based Section 8. As of September
2021, 126 families including 83 of whom have disabilities and 55 of whom are
elderly resided in Temecula and received public housing assistance. Residents
may identify as both disabled and elderly. These families occupied one through
four-bedroom units.
Program Type
Public
Housing
by
Program
Type
Mod-
Rehab Certificate
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
# of
units
vouchers
in use
79 456 8,748 36 8,364 135 178 19
Table 23 - Public Housing by Program Type
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and Nursing
Home Transition
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 100
Program Type
Characteristics
of Public
Housing
Residents
Mod-
Rehab Certificate
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose
Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Average
Annual Income 12,664 13,261 13,870 10,805 10,850 13,465 14,983
Average length
of stay 6 4 6 2 6 0 5
Average
Household size 1 3 2 1 2 1 3
# Homeless at
admission 2 331 205 1 197 2 5
# of Elderly
Program
Participants
(>62)
67 38 3,249 9 3,211 15 10
# of Disabled
Families 12 70 2,587 26 2,422 82 33
# of Families
requesting
accessibility
features
79 456 NA NA NA NA NA
# of HIV/AIDS
program
participants
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
# of DV victims 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Table 24 – Characteristics of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 101
Program Type
Race Mod-
Rehab Certificate
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
White 66 318 5,469 26 5,195 79 144 15
Black/African
American 10 126 2,967 8 2,867 55 29 3
Asian 1 9 209 2 203 0 2 1
American
Indian/Alaska
Native
0 2 80 0 76 1 3 0
Pacific
Islander 2 1 23 0 23 0 0 0
Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and
Nursing Home Transition
Table 25 – Race of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
Program Type
Ethnicity Mod-
Rehab Certificate
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
Hispanic 29 250 2,318 7 2,220 13 74 1
Not
Hispanic 50 206 6,430 29 6,144 122 104 19
*includes Non-Elderly Disabled, Mainstream One-Year, Mainstream Five-year, and
Nursing Home Transition
Table 26 – Ethnicity of Public Housing Residents by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 102
Section 504 Needs Assessment: Describe the needs of public housing
tenants and applicants on the waiting list for accessible units.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 prohibits discrimination on the
basis of disability in any program or activity that is conducted by federal
agencies or that receives financial assistance from a federal agency. A housing
provider may not deny or refuse to sell or rent to a person with a disability and
may not impose application or qualification criteria, rental fees, or sales prices
and rental or sales terms or conditions that are different than those required
of or provided to persons who are not disabled. Further, housing providers may
not require persons with disabilities to live only on certain floors, or to all live in
one section of the housing. Housing providers may not refuse to make repairs
and may not limit or deny someone with a disability access to recreational and
other public and common use facilities, parking privileges, cleaning or
janitorial services or any services that are made available to other residents.
When possible, HACR fulfills reasonable accommodation requests. These
include disabled access, desire to live near family and senior appropriate
housing. In the past five years, HACR has awarded 2,587 vouchers, 70
certificates, and 12 mod-rehabs to disabled families to better serve disabled
residents.
As of September 2021, HACR’s waitlist consisted of 117,718 families, roughly six
times as many small households are there were in Temecula in 2017. Of those
families waiting for housing assistance from HACR 74 percent were extremely
low-income, just over half (56 percent) of families on the waitlist have children,
about 12 percent are elderly, and 23 percent have disabilities. In Temecula there
were 1,521 families on the waitlist, of which 272 have disabilities and 339 are
elderly. The waitlist has been open since July 2015.
HACR takes the following steps proactively to serve the needs of disabled
residents:
• Marketing HACR programs to all eligible persons, including persons with
disabilities and persons with limited English proficiency.
• Utilizing buildings and communications that facilitate service delivery to
persons with disabilities. Application intake, office appointments,
voucher/contract issuance, and informal hearings are all conducted in
accessible office spaces. The Agency also provides home visits for
appointments upon request as a reasonable accommodation. Sign
language and Braille services are also available if necessary to service
hearing and visually impaired persons.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 103
Most immediate needs of residents of Public Housing and Housing Choice
voucher holders
The most pressing need is the high demand for affordable housing throughout
Riverside County. This is documented by the long waitlist, which consists of
117,718 families, 74 percent of whom are extremely low-income, 66,337 of whom
have children, 13,860 of whom are elderly, and 27,572 of whole have disabilities.
How do these needs compare to the housing needs of the population at
large?
The needs experienced by HARC residents are like the needs of very low-
income and low-income households throughout the City of Temecula.
Discussion
In the upcoming five years, HACR’s goals and objectives are as follows:
• Goal: Expand the supply of assisted housing; Objective Increase housing
choices for families and individuals
• Goal: Improve the quality of assisted housing; Objective: Maintain safe,
decent, sanitary units and improve quality of life for residents living in
assisted housing.
• Goal: Increase assisted housing choices; Objective: Encourage resident
choice in rental selection
• Goal: Promote self-sufficiency within assisted housing programs;
Objective: Promote economic independence for families and individuals
• Goal: Ensure equal opportunity and affirmatively further fair housing;
Objective: Promote equal housing opportunities
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 104
NA-40 HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Introduction
There are four federally defined categories under which individuals and families are
considered homeless:
1) Literally Homeless – An individual or family:
a. Living unsheltered on the streets;
b. Living in a vehicle or other place not meant for habitation ;
c. Living in an emergency shelter or transitional housing program, including a
motel/hotel paid by a charitable organization or government program; or
d. Exiting an institution (resided 90 days or less and previously resided in one
of the two items listed above).
2) Imminent Risk of Homelessness – An individual or family imminently losing their
housing:
a. Housing will be lost within 14 days; and
b. Has no subsequent residence; and
c. Lacks the resources and support network.
3) Homeless Under other Federal Statutes – An unaccompanied youth under the age
of 25 or families with children and youth, who do not otherwise qualify as homeless
under this definition, but who do meet all of the following:
a. Are defined as homeless under Section 387 of the Runaway and Homeless
Youth Act (42 U.S.C. 5732a), Section 637 of the Head Start Act (42 U.S.C. 9832),
Section 41403 of the Violence Against Women Act of 1994 (42 U.S.C. 14043e-
2), Section 330(h) of the Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 254b(h)), Section
3 of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 (7 U.S.C. 2012), Section 17(b) of the
Child Nutrition Act of 1966 (42 U.S.C. 1786(b)), or Section 725 of the McKinney-
Vento Homeless Assistance Act (42 U.S.C. 11434a);
b. Have not had a lease, ownership interest, or occupancy agreement in
permanent housing at any time during the 60 days immediately preceding
the date of application for homeless assistance;
c. Have experienced persistent instability as measured by two or more moves
during the 60-day period immediately preceding the date of applying for
homeless assistance; and
d. Can be expected to continue in such status for an extended period of time
because of chronic disabilities, chronic physical health or mental health
conditions, substance addiction, histories of domestic violence or childhood
abuse (including neglect), the presence of a child or youth with a disability,
or two or more barriers to employment, which include the lack of a high
school degree or General Education Development (GED), illiteracy, low
English proficiency, a history of incarceration or detention for criminal
activity, and a history of unstable employment.
4) Fleeing or Attempting to flee Domestic Violence – An individual or family:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 105
a. Fleeing or attempting to flee domestic violence situation, dating violence,
sexual assault, stalking, or other dangerous or life-threatening conditions
that relate to violence against the individual or a family member; and
b. Has no subsequent residence; and
c. Lacks the resources and support network.
According to the 2020 Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) to Congress,
during the January Point-in Time Count, California had the highest rate of
homelessness and unsheltered homelessness as well as the greatest increase in
homelessness year over year in the county. Over one quarter of the nation’s homeless
population was in California, and more than half of all the nation’s homeless
individuals are concentrated in four states: California (28 percent), New York (16
percent), Texas (five percent), and Florida (five percent). The number of people
experiencing homeless on a given night in California increased from 38 per 10,000 in
2019, to 41 per 10,000 in 2020.
The Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) is administered as a division of the
County’s Homelessness Prevention and Workforce Solutions (HHPWS) Department.
The CoC is a network of public and private sector homeless services providers which
collaborates on regional approaches to strategy development and service delivery.
HHPWS is the Homeless Management Information System (HMIS) lead for the
Riverside County CoC.
Every year, the Riverside County CoC conducts a Point-in Time (PIT) Count, to create
a census of unsheltered and sheltered individuals experiencing homelessness.
Figure 27
Data Source: 2013-2020 Riverside County COC Dat
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 106
From 2014 to 2017 there was a brief reduction in the number of people experiencing
homelessness in Riverside County, and by 2020 nearly all progress since 2013 had been
lost. Since 2013, the rate of homelessness experienced by children under the age of 18
has dropped by 56 percent from 384 children to 170 children, while the rate of
homelessness experience by transitionally aged children, those 18 to 25, has increase
by 74 percent from 201 people to 349 people.
Most of the Point in Time data is collected at the County level and is presented as such
in the tables below.
Homeless Needs Assessment Riverside County CoC Data (2020 Point in Time Count)
Population
Estimate the # of
persons experiencing
homelessness on a
given night
Estimate the
#
experiencing
homelessnes
s each year
Estimate
the #
becoming
homeless
each year
Estimate
the #
exiting
homeless
each year
Estimate the #
of days
persons
experience
homelessness Sheltered Unsheltere
d
Persons in
households with
adult(s) and
child(ren)
218 23
N/A N/A N/A N/A
Persons in
households with
only children
11 13
Persons in
households with
only adults
500 2,119
Chronically
homeless
individuals
129 878
Chronically
homeless
families
3 1
Veterans 50 183
Unaccompanied
Child 11 13
Persons with
HIV/AIDS 8 46
Table 27 - Homeless Needs Assessment
Alternate Data Source Name:
Riverside County Homeless Count & Survey Report
Data Source: 2020 PIT Count
Indicate if the homeless population type: Has No Rural Homeless
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 107
If data is not available for the categories "number of persons becoming and
exiting homelessness each year," and "number of days that persons
experience homelessness," describe these categories for each homeless
population type (including chronically homeless individuals and families,
families with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied
youth).
Data for the “number of persons becoming and exiting homelessness each year” and
the “number of days that people experience homelessness” is not readily available. A
description of chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children,
veterans and their families and unaccompanied youth is below.
A Chronically Homeless Individual or Family is living in an emergency shelter or in an
unsheltered location with a disabling condition and has been continuously homeless
for a year or more or has had at least four episodes of homelessness in the past three
years. Of those homeless people in Riverside County reported as chronically homeless,
129 were sheltered and 878 were unsheltered, included here were four families, three
of which were sheltered and one which was not.
Families with children include at least one household member aged 18 or over and at
least one household member under the age of 18. According to the PIT Count in
Riverside County, there were 241 people in households with at least one adult and one
child. Of these people 218 were living in emergency or transitional shelters and 23 were
unsheltered and in urgent need of housing assistance.
Veterans are persons who have served on active duty in the Armed Forces of the
United States. This does not include inactive military reserves or the National Guard
unless the person was called to active duty. The PIT count revealed 50 veterans who
were sheltered and homeless and 183 veterans who were unsheltered and homeless.
Unaccompanied youth, individuals under the age of 18 years old, are presumed to be
emancipated if they are unsheltered without an adult. According to the PIT count,
there were 24 unaccompanied youth who were homeless, consisting of 11 sheltered
and 13 unsheltered people. Among unaccompanied transitionally aged youth, ages 18
to 24, who were homeless, 52 were sheltered and 277 unsheltered.
Further, the PIT count showed 54 homeless people with HIV/AIDS, including eight
individuals who were sheltered and 46 who were unsheltered.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 108
Nature and Extent of Homelessness: (Optional)
Race Sheltered Unsheltered (optional)
White 493 1,538
Black or African American 193 431
Asian 7 31
American Indian or Alaska Native 12 79
Pacific Islander 1 27
Ethnicity Sheltered Unsheltered (optional)
Hispanic 287 750
Not Hispanic 442 1,405
Table 28 – Nature and Extent of Homelessness
Alternate Data Source Name:
Riverside County Homeless Count Report, 2020
Estimate the number and type of families in need of housing assistance for
families with children and the families of veterans.
According to the PIT Count in Riverside County, there were 72 households with at least
one adult and one child, comprised of 64 households living in emergency or
transitional shelters and eight households unsheltered and in urgent need of housing
assistance. There was a total of five parenting youth, aged 18 to 24, and five children of
parenting youth, under the age of 18, and all were sheltered.
The PIT count revealed 50 sheltered veterans and 183 unsheltered veterans. It is
unclear how many unique families are represented in this number. In the universe of
homeless families, it is not clear how many are families of deceased or estranged
veterans.
Describe the Nature and Extent of Homelessness by Racial and Ethnic
Group.
According to the PIT Count, an estimated 70 percent of homeless individuals were
identified as White in terms of race and 64 percent of homeless individuals were
identified as non-Hispanic in terms of ethnicity. The next largest unsheltered racial
groups experiencing homelessness were Black/African American (22 percent) and
American Indian/ Alaska Native (3 percent).
According to the PIT Count 2,031 individuals were identified as White in terms of race,
24 percent of whom were sheltered; 1,847 homeless individuals were identified as
non-Hispanic in terms of ethnicity, 24 percent of whom were sheltered. The next
largest homeless racial groups include 624 people identified as Black/African
American (31 percent sheltered) and 91 people identified as American Indian or Alaska
Native (13 percent sheltered).
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 109
Describe the Nature and Extent of Unsheltered and Sheltered
Homelessness.
Of the 2,155 people who are homeless and unsheltered, approximately 41 percent
meet the definition of chronic homelessness, which is a person with a disabling
condition who has been living in a place not meant for human habitation
continuously for one year or on at least four occasions (totaling at least 12 months)
over the past three years. Additionally, an estimated 35 percent of those unsheltered
people face substance use issues, and nearly 29 percent have mental health issues.
Over eight percent have experienced domestic violence.
Of the 729 people who are sheltered, about 18 percent meet the definition of chronic
homelessness, approximately 11 percent face substance use issues, about 25 percent
have mental health issues, and an estimated five percent have experienced domestic
violence.
Discussion
In consideration of the PIT Count results from January 2020 indicating on any given
night in Riverside County, approximately 2,884 people are homeless, including 2,155
people who were homeless and unsheltered. The City considers homelessness
prevention and rapid re-housing as high priority needs for the 2022-2026
Consolidated Plan strategy.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 110
NA-45 NON-HOMELESS SPECIAL NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Introduction
Special needs populations consist of persons who are not homeless, but due to various
reasons need services and supportive housing. Persons with special needs include the
elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled, physically disabled,
persons with alcohol or other drug addictions, persons with HIV/AIDS and victims of
domestic violence. The City of Temecula will consider allocating CDBG public services
funding to programs that provide services to special needs populations; including but
not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly, developmentally disabled,
physically disabled, mentally disabled, persons with alcohol or other drug addictions,
persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, victims of human trafficking and
veterans with PTSD or other needs.
Describe the characteristics of special needs populations in your
community.
Elderly and Frail Elderly
The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) defines elderly as a
person who is 62 years of age or older. A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is
unable to perform at least three “activities of daily living” including eating, bathing,
grooming or home management activities. Generally, elderly people have lower
incomes than the population at large. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data of the 9,099
households containing at least one elderly person in Temecula, nearly 29 percent
(2,624 households) earn less than 80 percent of the AMI for Riverside County and may
require public services to continue to live independently.
Persons with Disabilities
HUD defines a disabled person as having a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities. The obstacle to independent living
for these adults is not only their disability, but also the lack of financial resources, often
related to limited employment. Additionally, persons with disabilities have high health
care costs, are dependent on supportive services, and may require accessibility
modifications to accommodate their disability. Based on the 2017, 1-year ACS estimate,
of the total Civilian Noninstitutionalized Population age 18 and to 64 (67,915) in
Temecula, an estimated 5,940 persons have a disability. Of these persons, over 55
percent are employed, and 42 percent are not in the labor force.
Alcohol and Other Drug Addictions
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ Substance Abuse and Mental
Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) conducts the National Survey on Drug Use
and Health (NSDUH) which measures use of illegal and prescription drugs, alcohol
and tobacco and misuse of prescription drugs; substance use disorder and substance
use treatment major depressive episodes and depression care; and, serious
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 111
psychological distress, mental illness, and mental health care among those aged 12
and above in the civilian noninstitutionalized population. In the NSDUH substate
analysis, Riverside County is evaluated together with Imperial County in what is
identified as Regions 13 and 19R. The percentages are based on annual averages from
2016, 2017 and 2018. The data shows an unmet need for treatment at a specialty facility
in the last year for illicit drug use of almost three percent, alcohol use of almost six
percent, and for substance use of nearly eight percent of the population. The survey
also shows while nearly 18 percent of the population reported any mental illness in the
past year only about 12 percent received mental health services during the same
period. There is an indicated need for improved access to mental health services and
specialty treatment facilities.
HIV/AIDS
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one’s immune system
by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control’s
(CDC) Atlas Plus program reported an estimated 10,400 persons living with HIV
disease at the end of 2019 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm, accessed
October 2021). Of those people, 9,414 were HIV diagnosed, which includes 268 new
diagnoses during that year. New HIV diagnoses (35 percent) were most concentrated
among those 25 to 34 years of age. For persons living with HIV/AIDS, access to
affordable housing, supportive services and quality health care is important to
maintaining their health and well-being.
Victims of Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of
violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is
cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2020, residents of Temecula
made a total of 213 calls to law enforcement related to do mestic
violence(openjustice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2021). Of these calls:
• 193 of these domestic incidents did not involve a weapon
• 20 calls involved a weapon
o 0 domestic incidents involved a firearm
o 0 domestic incidents involved a knife or cutting instruments
o 3 domestic incidents involved other dangerous weapons
o 17 domestic incidents involved personal weapons (i.e., feet or hands)
o 0 cases involved strangulation
o 0 cases involved suffocation
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 112
What are the housing and supportive service needs of these populations
and how are these needs determined?
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs
populations, the City conducted surveys, consulted with local service providers and
reviewed ACS data. Supportive services required for special needs populations include
case management, medical or psychological counseling and supervision, childcare,
transportation, and job training provided for the purpose of facilitating a person’s
stability and independence.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility
disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no-step thresholds,
installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The
needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility
disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities may require visual adaptations for
telephone ringers, doorbells, and smoke alarms. Residents who are blind may require
tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille markings on
appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print markings and
displays, contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition from one area
to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and windows.
For persons with special needs, the high cost of living in Riverside County makes it
difficult to maintain a stable residence. Often these segments of the population rely
on support services from various Riverside County nonprofit organizations to avoid
becoming homeless or institutionalized.
Discuss the size and characteristics of the population with HIV/AIDS and
their families within the Eligible Metropolitan Statistical Area.
According to the CDC, at the end of 2019, an 1,059,784 people in the United States had
HIV and 36,740 were newly diagnosed the same year (cdc.gov, accessed October
2021). In Riverside County 9,414 people had been diagnosed with HIV as of the end of
2019. CDC data show, the number of persons living with HIV in Riverside County has
increased from 3,693 in 2009 to the 2019 figure of 9,446, marked by a steep increase
of over 100 percent beginning in 2016, and continuing through the last data point. Of
those with knowledge of their status 85 percent were in receipt of medical care and
78 percent had reached viral suppression. Viral load is an indicator of health and
adherence to medication. A high viral load is indicative of illness. Viral load suppression
(less than 200 copies/ml) is suggestive of improved health.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 113
Figure 28
Data Source: 2008-2019, Centers for Disease Control, Atlas Plus Data
In 2019, there were a reported 268 new HIV diagnoses in Riverside County. People
aged 25 to 34 accounted for just over 35 percent, the greatest concentration, of new
cases. Of the newly diagnosed 88 percent were male, 12 percent were female; 51
percent were Hispanic, 28 percent were White, 14 percent were African American, and
three percent were Asian. The data was suppressed for those identifying as American
Indian/ Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian/ Other Pacific Islander, and Multiple Races
because the number were deemed low enough to threaten individual anonymity.
Furthermore, 80 percent of new diagnoses had been linked to care.
Discussion
In addition to the elderly, frail elderly, severe mentally ill, developmentally disabled,
physically disabled, persons with alcohol and other drug addictions, persons with
HIV/AIDS and victims of domestic violence described above, two other
subpopulations with special needs in Riverside County include victims of human
trafficking and individuals with PTSD.
Victims of Human Trafficking
Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent, or coercive
methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain.
The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude,
enslavement, debt bondage or commercial sex acts. Human trafficking is extremely
difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. Between 2015
and 2019, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from
California, of all 50 states (https://humantraffickinghotline.org/ accessed October
2021). Of national cases reported to the hotline the majority were sex trafficking, adult,
and women.
The United States, Department of State’s 2021 Trafficking in Persons Report published
in June 2021, reports victims of human trafficking found in every state in the country
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 114
and victims trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in
the United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico,
and Honduras. Trafficking in Persons reports individuals most vulnerable to human
trafficking “include: children in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems,
including foster care; runaway and homeless youth; unaccompanied children;
individuals seeking asylum; American Indians and Alaska Natives, particularly women
and girls; individuals with substance use issues; migrant laborers, including
undocumented workers and participants in visa programs for temporary workers;
foreign national domestic workers in diplomatic households; persons with limited
English proficiency; persons with disabilities; LGBTQI+ persons; and victims of intimate
partner violence or domestic violence.”
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains Post-traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD) can “develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is
beyond a typical stressor” and potential inducing events may include, but are not
limited to, “violent personal assaults, natural or human-caused disasters, accidents,
combat, and other forms of violence.” Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S.
Department of Veteran’s Affairs National Center for PTSD recognize s the disorder
impacts populations inside and outside of the military including families, children, and
non-combatants. The National Center reports an estimated six percent of the
population – eight percent of women and four percent of men – will have PTSD at
some point in their lives. Applying those rates to the 110,720 residents of the City of
Temecula, approximately 6,643 suffer from PTSD.
The 2020 Homeless PIT count reported 184 sheltered and 627 unsheltered individuals,
representing nearly 34 percent of all homeless people in Riverside County, were living
with severe mental illness. Within this group are some individuals who suffer from
PTSD. Applying the definition of PTSD from above to the 35 sheltered and 177
unsheltered homeless people in Riverside County who have experienced the trauma
of domestic violence it is reasonable to assume some also experience PTSD. Similarly,
of the 50 sheltered and 183 unsheltered veterans in the County it is reasonable to
assume some experienced trauma during military service and may suffer from PTSD.
Challenges these special needs populations and subpopulations face include low-
income and high housing cost. This segment of the population also struggles for a
decent quality of life that includes access to necessities, adequate food, clothing, and
medical care.
Novel coronavirus COVID-19
COVID-19 caused a global pandemic. It’s widespread impact on the United States
began in March 2020. In the ensuing years ways of life changed dramatically from the
impact of measures to prevent spread of disease and deaths cause by the disease.
Vaccines are proven to reduce hospitalization and death from COVID-19. In November
2022 vaccines became available to people ages five and over. The number of people
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 115
who are sick with or have died from COVID-19 increases daily. According to the most
relevant data source per geography COVID-19 cases and deaths and vaccination rates
as of January 27, 2022, are as follows:
Unites States California Riverside County Temecula
Cases 72,8744,041 7,629,666 445,110 12,483
Deaths 873,957 86,021 5,812 111
Percentage of
population age 5 and
over with at least one
vaccine for
79.8% 81.7% 67.0% 70.4%
Table 29
Data Source: California Department of Health, Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch,
United States data is sourced from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), California
State data is sources from California Public Health Department, Riverside County and
Temecula data are sourced from Riverside University Public Health System, Temecula
vaccination data is as of January 24, 2022.
COVID-19 has had a disproportionate impact on Black, Indigenous, and People of
Color (BIPOC), including people who identify as Latinx/Hispanic regardless of racial
identity. This is true nationwide including in Riverside County. The Riverside University
Public Health reports case rates by race/ethnicity as of January 27, 2022, as follows:
• American Indian or Alaska Native – 15%
• Asian – 9%
• Black or African American – 13%
• Hispanic/ Latinx – 15%
• Multiple Races – 6%
• Native Hawaiian/ Pacific Islander – 31%
• White – 10%
In the last five years, the City of Temecula provided CDBG public service funds for
activities including those providing supportive services for people with HIV/AIDS,
victims of domestic violence, seniors, and disabled adults.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 116
NA-50 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
NEEDS
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Facilities.
Temecula’s 2030 Quality of Life Master Plan describes the City as built upon a strong
base of civic participation. In 1989, when the City was incorporated, it was a small
bedroom community. It has evolved and experienced significant growth in
population and economic activity since then. As the City continues to grow, new areas,
facilities and open spaces are incorporated into the City’s General Plan. While new
facilities and amenities continue to be added, older facilities require rehabilitation to
address the changing needs of the community.
The City of Temecula Community Services Master Plan, completed in early 2020,
identified the city’s significant public spaces and needs, and provides a vision for
future investment. The City of Temecula has 41 parks covering over 320 acres, over
6,000 acres of preserved open space, 22 miles of trails, 97 miles of bike paths, and 14
community facilities including a library, senior center, four recreation centers, two
museums, and the Old Town Temecula Community theater. The City also has three
public pools, a universally accessible playground, a skate park, and a pump track.
Maintaining and expanding these amenities requires significant financial investment.
Responses to the Resident and Community Stakeholder Surveys give insight into the
needs and priorities of those who live and work in Temecula. Residents responded
there is the highest level of need for health care facilities and that health care facilities
are second in priority to homeless facilities. Stakeholders responded the highest level
of need is for senior and youth centers. The largest number of residents responded
there is a high or moderate level of need for youth centers.
CDBG public facility projects that meet CDBG eligibility requirements, align with a
Strategic Plan goal and address a CDBG National Objective will be considered for
funding in the five Annual Action Plans. The Strategic Plan includes a goal to improve
public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and moderate-income people or
those presumed under HUD regulations to be low- and moderate-income, such as
elderly people and adults with disabilities. Some of the types of facilities and
infrastructure that may require rehabilitation during the next five years include, but
are not limited to community centers, senior centers, parks, and recreational facilities.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public facilities were determined through Community
Meetings, responses from the Consolidated Plan Survey and consultation with City
officials. Over the next five years, the Strategic Plan continues to prioritize additional
or improved public facilities to enhance or maintain the high level of services and
amenities available to Temecula residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 117
Figure 29: Resident Survey, Need for Public Facilities
Figure 30: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Facility
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 118
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Improvements.
Infrastructure such as streets, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, storm drains, sewers, driveway
approaches, pedestrian crossing, and streetlights in CDBD target areas or to support
a project that benefits an identifiable segment of the population comprised of low-
and moderate-income residents or residents presumed under HUD regulations to be
low- and moderate-income must be developed and maintained. Infrastructure
improvements are included as part of the Strategic Plan goal concerning City of
Temecula Public Facilities Improvements should the need arise to modify existing
infrastructure or install new infrastructure.
Responses to the Resident Survey show public infrastructure for high-speed internet
is and street/ alley improvements are of greatest need and highest priority.
How were these needs determined?
The needs identified for public infrastructure improvements were determined in
consultation with the City residents, City of Temecula’s Public Works Department,
Community Services Department, and affordable housing developers.
Figure 31: Resident Survey, Need for Public Infrastructure Improvements
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 119
Figure 32: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Infrastructure Improvement
Describe the jurisdiction’s need for Public Services.
Those in need of public services are diverse and numerous. The homeless and non-
homeless special needs populations are described in the Consolidated Plan Needs
Assessment sections 40 and 45. Results from resident and community
stakeholder surveys show the largest number respondents see a high and
moderate need for mental health services followed by youth serv ices and
childcare services. Residents responding to the survey believe anti -crime
programs, mental health services, and homeless services to be highest priority
for the City.
Stakeholder surveys were solicited from employees of agencies and
organizations providing services to low- and moderate-income residents of
Temecula. These surveys show four types of services where 100 percent of the
need was high or moderate. In order from most highly needed to least those
services are as follows: services for disabled persons, supportive services for
seniors, mental health services, and domestic violence services. Additionally,
stakeholders identified substance abuse services and center/ services for
disabled persons as of the greatest high and moderate need.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 120
How were these needs determined?
Public service needs are based on the City’s desire to ensure that high quality services
are provided to maintain residents’ quality of life and to promote the well-being of all
Temecula residents — particularly low- and moderate-income residents including
youth, seniors, and people with special needs. Responses to the Resident Survey are
presented in Error! Reference source not found. and Error! Reference source not
found.. Responses to the Stakeholder Survey are not presented graphically, as it had
a total of eight responses. As a result of the citizen participation and consultation
process and in consideration of the local nonprofits and City departments offering
services, the City considers public services benefitting low- and moderate-income
residents a high priority in the Strategic Plan.
Figure 33: Resident Survey, Level of need for Public Services
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 121
Figure 34: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Public Service
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 122
Housing Market Analysis
MA-05 OVERVIEW
Housing Market Analysis Overview
This section of the Consolidated Plan evaluates housing market conditions in
Temecula including housing supply, demand, condition, and cost. Temecula’s
housing stock primarily consists of single-family detached residential dwellings (78
percent), with 21,165 or 93 percent of the owner-occupied housing stock consisting of
units with three or more bedrooms and most of the rental housing stock consisting
of units that have two bedrooms (6,250 units or 52 percent) or one bedroom (4,095
units or 34 percent).
From September 2017 to September 2021, median home value in Temecula increased
49 percent from $454,000 to $676,000, according to Zillow Home Value Index. Median
monthly rent for a one-bedroom unit increased by 43 percent from $1,833 to $2,185, as
reported by Zumper, a rental listing aggregator. As a result, Temecula households
have become increasingly cost-burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows that there is an
insufficient number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 80
percent of AMI.
In the Needs Assessment section of this document, tables 10 and 11 show, of the
households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, 6,070 are cost burdened households —
meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing.
Additionally, most cost burdened households, 4,645 households, are considered
severely cost burdened households — meaning they pay more than 50 percent of
their income for housing. Of the 4,645 severely cost burdened households earning 0-
80 percent of AMI, 2,965 are renters. Of those severely cost burdened renter
households, 1,100 households earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the
most at risk of becoming homeless.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 123
Figure 35
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
According to Table 36 – Housing Affordability in Section MA-15, there are 2,150 rental
and 389 owner housing units in the City of Temecula affordable to households earning
less than 80 percent of AMI. According to Table 7 - Total Households Table in Section
NA-10, there are 7,600 households in Temecula earning less than 80 percent of AMI,
resulting in an estimated need for 5,061 additional housing units that are affordable
to households earning less than 80 percent of AMI.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 124
MA-10 NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
Introduction
According to 2013-2017 ACS data, 84 percent of the City’s housing stock is comprised
of single- family housing (one-four units). Multifamily housing (five or more units)
accounts for only 16 percent of total housing units in the City. Mobile homes comprise
the smallest portion of the housing stock in the City (one percent).
Most ownership housing units in the City of Temecula is comprised of larger units
containing three or more bedrooms (52 percent). In comparison, only 14 percent of
the City’s rental housing is comprised of one- or no bedroom units. The tables below
indicate the number of residential properties in the City by property type, unit size and
tenure.
Property Type Number %
1-unit detached structure 27,965 78%
1-unit, attached structure 925 3%
2-4 units 960 3%
5-19 units 3,440 10%
20 or more units 2,145 6%
Mobile Home, boat, RV, van, etc. 338 1%
Total 35,773 100%
Table 30 – Residential Properties by Unit Number
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Owners Renters
Number % Number %
No bedroom 25 0% 200 2%
1 bedroom 55 0% 1,500 12%
2 bedrooms 1,350 6% 4,095 34%
3 or more bedrooms 20,165 93% 6,250 52%
Total 21,595 99% 12,045 100%
Table 31 – Unit Size by Tenure
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 125
Describe the number and targeting (income level/type of family served) of
units assisted with federal, state, and local programs.
As of fall 2021, the City monitors a total of 17 affordable housing projects in Temecula,
which were constructed or rehabilitated with federal subsidy contracts, received tax
credits or mortgage revenue bonds, and /or were financed by Redevelopment Agency
(RDA) funds or nonprofit developers. The 17 projects consist of a total of 764 units in
which 759 units are restricted to extremely/very low, low- and moderate-income
households (under State HCD guidelines).
Over the last five years, three entitled affordable housing projects have broken ground
and will add a total of 191 new affordable units to Temecula’s housing stock. Those
projects are as follows: (1) Vice Creek with a total of 60 units of which 18 are targeted
for households earning 30 percent of AMI, 12 for households with incomes at 50
percent AMI, 29 for households at 60 percent AMI, with a subset of 15 units targeted
for people with special needs; (2) Las Hacienda with a total of 77 units of which 24 are
targeted to households at 30 percent of AMI, eight for households earning 50 percent
of AMI, 44 for households earning 80 percent of AMI and one market rate unit; (3)
Rancho-Highlands with a total of 270 units, 55 of which are targeted to households
earning 80 percent of AMI and the remainder of which are market rate.
Like all cities in the State of California, Temecula is challenged by a lack of resources
to address its affordable housing needs due to the dissolution of all the State’s
redevelopment agencies. This had been the source of many affordable housing units
constructed in the City.
Provide an assessment of units expected to be lost from the affordable
housing inventory for any reason, such as expiration of Section 8 contracts.
HUD requires the City to analyze federal, state and locally assisted housing units that
may be lost from the City’s affordable housing stock. The expiration of affordability
restrictions on government assisted rental units is the typical reason that affo rdable
units convert to market rate and are “lost.” Much of the housing at-risk of conversion
from affordable housing to market rate housing is predominantly reserved for lower
income households.
Use restrictions, as defined by state law, means any federal, state, or local statute,
regulation, ordinance, or contract which as a condition of receipt of any housing
assistance, including a rental subsidy, mortgage subsidy, or mortgage insurance, to
an assisted housing development, establishes maximum limitations on tenant
income as a condition of eligibility for occupancy.
Conversion Risk
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 126
Table 32 provides an inventory of affordable housing developments, including funding
sources, number of units, target populations, and earliest date of conversion to
market-rate housing. Analysis shows, for the period ending May 2021, 754 affordable
housing units 256 are at high risk of converting to market rate housing. The units at
high risk of conversion are part of two projects, both of which were funded with
Redevelopment Agency loans. The restrictions on those properties are set to expire in
2026.
Project/Address Type Total Units Type of
Subsidy
Date of
Conversion
Risk
Cameron
Historical
Building
Family 24 RDA Loan 2062 Low
Cottages of Old
Town
17 RDA Loan 2047 Low
Creekside Apts. 48 LIHTC,
Sections
515,538,521
2040 Low
Front Street
Plaza
Family &
Senior
23 RDA Loan 2069 Low
FT-02-029 1 LIHTC 2027 High
Habitat I & II 9 Land/Cash
Contribution
2047 Low
Madera Vista
Apts.
Family &
Senior
110 LIHTC 2068 Low
Mission Village
Apts.
Family 75 LIHTC 2029 High
Oaktree Apts. Family 39 LIHTC,
Sections
515,538,521
2040 Low
Palomar
Building
Family 22 RDA Loan 2062 Low
Portola Terrace
Apts.
Family &
Senior
44 LIHTC 2067 Low
Rancho
California Apts.
Family 54 LIHTC 2067 Low
Rancho West
Apts.
Family 150 RDA Loan 2026 High
Rancho Creek
Apts.
Family 30 RDA Loan 2026 High
Riverbank
Apts./Pujol
Street Senior
Apts.
Family 65 LIHTC 2058 Low
Temecula
Reflections
(Temecula Lane)
Family 11 Builder
Financed/
Development
Rights
2065 Low
Warehouse at
Creekside Apts.
Family 32 RDA Loan 2065 Low
Table 32
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 127
Preservation and Replacement Options
To maintain the existing affordable housing stock, the City may either attempt to
preserve the existing assisted units or facilitate the development of new units. Each
negotiation to preserve affordable units is unique in the sense that each project’s
ownership interests, and economic needs will vary, and City resources may be
insufficient to preserve all 256 high risk units. Depending on the circumstances of
each project that includes at-risk units, different options may be used to preserve or
replace the units. The City is currently exploring formation of a potential Housing Trust
in cooperation with Western Riverside Council of Governments.
Does the availability of housing units meet the needs of the population?
The current availability of housing units in Temecula do not meet the needs of the
population. There is a significant need for additional rental housing units —
particularly zero, one, and two-bedroom units affordable to households earning less
than 80 percent of AMI. According to the data discussed in the Needs Assessment,
the most common housing problems in the City are cost burden and overcrowding.
There are 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI that are
severely cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs
(Table 11). Overcrowding, having more than 1.01 people per room, excluding
bathrooms, porches, foyers, halls, or half-rooms, affects over 479 low- and moderate-
income Temecula households, almost 86 percent of whom are renters (Table 12).
Describe the need for specific types of housing.
Of the 2,150 renter households who earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are severely
cost burdened paying more than 50 percent of their income for housing costs:
• 1,350 are small, related households with four or fewer members
• 170 are large, related households with five or more members
• 425 are elderly households with one or more members over age 62
• 205 are other/single person households
This breakdown by tenure, income, cost burden and household type indicate a need
for additional affordable zero-, one- and two-bedroom rental units in Temecula.
Discussion
For decades, California’s housing market has been among the most expensive in the
country, and those conditions persist in 2021. Renting can take up a considerable
amount of income, while purchasing a home may be out of reach for individuals. To
afford median rent for a two-bedroom unit in 2021, a household needs to earn $49 per
hour or work 140 hours per week at minimum wage of $14 per hour, which equates to
over three full time jobs. These calculations were made using the same method as the
National Low Income Housing Coalition in the Out if Reach series and using median
rents from Zumper a rental listing aggregator. Median rents are far greater than fair
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 128
market rents and more accurately reflect the experience low- and moderate-income
households are facing.
Figure 36
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021), California Employment Data
As noted in the 2021-2029 Housing Element, it is the City’s goal to encourage the
development of an adequate and diverse supply of housing that accommodates the
changing housing needs of all Temecula residents. Over the next eight years the City
will strive to meet the following housing goals and priorities:
• Provide a diversity of housing opportunities that satisfy the physical, social, and
economic needs of existing and future residents of Temecula.
• Provide housing for people of different economic segments with special needs.
• Reduce and/ or remove governmental and non-governmental constraints in
the maintenance, improvement, and development of housing, where
appropriate and legally possible.
• Conserve and improve existing housing stock with an emphasis on affordable
housing.
• Affirmatively further fair housing, providing equal housing opportunity for all
residents in Temecula.
• Encourage collaboration between housing developers and neighborhood
organizations on affordable housing projects and addressing neighborhood
concerns.
Through these efforts, the City will strive to maintain a healthy community that
encourages family stability and economic growth.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 129
MA-15 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: COST OF HOUSING
Introduction
One of the most important factors in evaluating a community’s housing market is the
cost of housing and whether the housing is affordable to households who live there
or would like to live there. If housing costs are relatively high in comparison to
household income, a correspondingly high prevalence of housing cost burden and
overcrowding will typically occur.
Table 34 – Cost of Housing indicates the median home value and contract rent (not
including utility or other associated costs). These values are self-reported by residents
through the U.S. Census American Community Survey. However, in looking at more
current housing sales and rental market data – the cost of housing has risen
tremendously over the past five years.
According to Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, median rents for one-bedroom, two-
bedroom, and three-bedroom units have increased steadily (43, 45 and 39 percent,
respectively) from October 2017 to 2021. There was a short-lived decline in rents for
one-bedroom units in 2019. The 2017 median rents reported by Zumper significantly
exceeded the median contract rent as reported by the ACS 2013-2017 estimates.
documented in the Cost of Housing table below.
Figure 37
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021), California Employment Data
Median home values have increased significantly since the last Consolidated Planning
process. In 2017, according to ACS data, median home values in Temecula were still
eight percent below what they had been in 2009, prior to the mortgage -backed
securities housing foreclosure crisis. By 2018, according to the same source, housing
prices rebounded to 2009 levels. From September 2017 to 2021 housing values for
Temecula increased 49 percent, from $483,000 to $676,000, according to the Zillow
Home Value Index.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 130
Figure 38
Data Source: 2017-2021 Zillow Home Value Data (accessed 12/22/21)
Based on the reported housing costs, Table 36 – Housing Affordability indicates the
number of units that are currently affordable to households at different levels of the
HUD AMI. It is important to note, simply because a unit is affordable to residents at an
income level, it does not necessarily mean a household at that income level is
occupying the unit.
Rental Housing
Cost by Bedroom Oct. 2017 Oct. 2021 Percent Change
1-bedroom $1,476 $2,109 43%
2-bedroom $1,680 $2,430 45%
3-bedroom $1,979 $2,748 39%
Table 33 – Rental Housing Cost Estimates
Data Source: Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/2021)
Cost of Housing Base Year: 2009 Most Recent Year:
2017 % Change
Median Home Value 427,900 394,600 -8%
Median Contract Rent 1,302 1,569 21%
Table 34 – Cost of Housing
Data Source: 2005-2009 ACS (Base Year), 2013-2017 ACS (Most Recent Year)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 131
Rent Paid Number %
Less than $500 610 5.0%
$500-999 1,148 10.0%
$1,000-1,499 3.930 33.0%
$1,500-1,999 3,880 32.0%
$2,000 or more 2,490 21.0%
Total 12,058 100.0%
Table 35 - Rent Paid
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Units affordable to Households at: Renter Owner
30% HAMFI 130 No Data
50% HAMFI 460 105
80% HAMFI 1,560 284
100% HAMFI No Data 687
Total 2,150 1,076
Table 36 – Housing Affordability
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Monthly Rent ($) Efficiency (no
bedroom)
1
Bedroom
2
Bedroom
3
Bedroom
4
Bedroom
Fair Market Rent 955 1,106 1,390 1,917 2,369
High HOME Rent 879 943 1,134 1,302 1,433
Low HOME Rent 691 740 888 1,027 1,146
Table 37 – Monthly Rent
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents
Is there sufficient housing for households at all income levels?
Housing cost burden and severe housing cost burden data from section NA -10
indicates there is an insufficient supply of affordable housing units in the City.
Insufficient supply of affordable housing is reality throughout the country, exemplified
by the need in Temecula, Riverside County, and California Quantifying the number of
additional affordable housing units needed to eliminate or significantly reduce cost
burden and severe cost burden is complicated because there is no guarantee a
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 132
household of a particular income level will occupy a unit affordable at their income
level – even if the unit is available in the open marketplace.
Table 36 – Housing Affordability provides 2013-2017 CHAS data concerning the supply
of housing units in the City that are affordable to households earning at or below 30,
50, 80 and 100 percent of AMI. According to 2013-2017 ACS data in Table 7, there are
1,880 households in Temecula earning 0-30 percent of AMI. Table 36 indicates there
are a total of 130 rental units affordable to households at this income level. Based on
this data, there is an apparent need for 1,750 additional housing units affordable to
households earning 0-30 percent of AMI. At the 0-50 percent of AMI level, there are
695 affordable units and 4,090 households in this income category – a shortfall of 3,395
units. At the 0-80 percent of AMI level, there are 2,539 affordable units and 7,600
households in this income category – a shortfall of 5,061 units.
How is affordability of housing likely to change considering changes to
home values and/or rents?
Rental housing costs have increased steadily over the past five years – creating more
pressure on extremely low-income households. According to data in Table 32 from
Zumper, a rental listing aggregator, average rents for one-bedroom apartments rose
from $1,476 per month in 2017 to $2,109 per month in 2021, a 43 percent increase. Two-
bedroom apartment rents increased from $1,680 to $2,430 on average, an increase of
45 percent. Three-bedroom rents increased from $1,979 to $2,748 an increase of 39
percent over the last five years. These rents for the City of Temecula are substantially
higher than the Fair Market Rents for Riverside County and represent a significant
burden for low- and moderate-income households struggling to remain housed.
Similarly, median home sales prices increased from $454,000 to $676,000 from
September 2017 to 2021 according to sales data supplied by Zillow as show in Figure
38. Based on this information and barring significant regional and national changes
in economic conditions, the price of housing in Temecula is forecast to continue
increasing during the period of the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan.
How do HOME rents / Fair Market Rent compare to Area Median Rent? How
might this impact your strategy to produce or preserve affordable
housing?
The median contract rent according to 2013-2017 ACS data was $1,569, which is slightly
more than the Fair Market Rent for a two-bedroom unit, $1,390 and even closer to
market rent for a one-bedroom as reported by Zumper. To produce or preserve
affordable rental housing units that carry a minimum HOME affordability period of 20
years, significant levels of subsidy are required. Taking only rents into consideration,
an owner of a two-bedroom unit would forego $58,560 of operating income over 20
years, in 2021 dollars, when renting the unit at Low HOME rent levels instead of at Fair
Market Rent. An owner of a one-bedroom unit would forego $79,200 of operating
income over 20 years, in 2021 dollars, when renting the unit at Low HOME rent levels
instead of market rates.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 133
Figure 39
Data Source: HUD FMR and HOME Rents, 2015-2017 ACS Data, Zumper Research (accessed 10/22/21)
Discussion
Economic expansion over the last decade and a lag in production of new housing
units in Southern California have created a housing economy that is over -burdened.
For the City of Temecula that means early master planning efforts and visions of a
community with diverse housing stock and household incomes are being pushed to
the brink. This is a microcosm of national and especially regional increases in housing
prices and insufficient supply of affordable housing.
Temecula is easily accessible to San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, and Los
Angeles counties. Due to its proximity to a variety of jobs centers, Temecula is a
desirable and relatively affordable place to reside. As a result, Temecula households
have become increasingly cost-burdened. Data from 2013-2017 shows an insufficient
number of housing units affordable to people with incomes less than 30, 50, and 80
percent of AMI. Considering the scarcity of land and monetary resources available to
create new affordable housing units, housing affordability is expected to remain a
significant challenge in the next five years. The City actively monitors this steadily
increasing pressure and the already limited supply of affordable housing.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 134
MA-20 HOUSING MARKET ANALYSIS: CONDITION OF
HOUSING – 91.210(A)
Introduction
Assessing the age and physical condition of housing in Temecula forms the basis of
strategies to maintain and improve housing quality for low- and moderate-income
residents. For this assessment, the ACS defines a “selected condition” as ow ner- or
renter-occupied housing units with at least one of the following conditions: 1) lacking
complete plumbing facilities; 2) lacking complete kitchen facilities; 3) more than one
occupant per room; and 4) selected monthly housing costs greater than 30 percent
of household income. Although most housing units in Temecula have none of the
defined conditions, Table 37 shows 52 percent of renter-occupied units in Temecula
have one or two selected conditions.
Definitions
Substandard housing is housing that does not meet the minimum standards
contained in the State Housing Code (i.e., does not provide shelter, endangers health,
safety, or well-being of occupants). A substandard condition is one that adversely
affects habitability of the housing unit. As defined by California Health and Safety
Code, a substandard condition exists to the extent that it endangers the health and
safety of its occupants or the public. Such conditions include:
• Inadequate sanitation
• Structural hazards
• Any nuisance that endangers the health and safety of the occupants or the
public
• All substandard plumbing, wiring, and/or mechanical equipment, unless it
conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of installation and has
been maintained in a good and safe condition
• Faulty weather protection
• The use of construction materials not allowed or approved by the health and
safety code
• Fire, health and safety hazards (as determined by the appropriate fire or health
official)
• Lack of, or inadequate fire-resistive construction or fire-extinguishing systems
as required by the health and safety code, unless the construction and/or
systems conformed to all applicable laws in effect at the time of construction
and/or installation and adequately maintained
• Inadequate structural resistance to horizontal forces
• Buildings or portions thereof occupied for living, sleeping, cooking, or dining
purposes that were not designed or intended to be used for such occupancies
• Inadequate maintenance that causes a building or any portion thereof to be
declared unsafe
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 135
Standard housing condition in the City of Temecula is defined as housing that meets
the minimum standards of the State Housing Code. For the purposes of the CDBG
program, a unit in substandard condition is considered suitable for rehabilitation
provided the unit is structurally sound, and the cost of rehabilitation is considered
economically warranted.
Condition of Units Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
With one selected Condition 6,620 31% 5,785 48%
With two selected Conditions 155 1% 505 4%
With three selected
Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
With four selected Conditions 0 0% 0 0%
No selected Conditions 14,825 69% 5,750 48%
Total 21,600 101% 12,040 100%
Table 38 - Condition of Units
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Year Unit Built Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
2000 or later 8,290 38% 4,900 41%
1980-1999 11,920 55% 6,050 50%
1950-1979 1,285 6% 990 8%
Before 1950 105 0% 105 1%
Total 21,600 99% 12,045 100%
Table 39 – Year Unit Built
Data Source: 2013-2017 CHAS
Risk of Lead-Based Paint Hazard Owner-Occupied Renter-Occupied
Number % Number %
Total Number of Units Built Before 1980 1,415 7% 1,035 5%
Housing Units build before 1980 with
children present 95 0% 155 1%
Table 40 – Risk of Lead-Based Paint
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Total Units) 2013-2017 CHAS (Units with Children present)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 136
2018 2019
Level Riverside County California Riverside County California
4.5-9.4 154 5,850 147 4,575
9.5+ 26 1,291 38 1,128
Total Tested 34,046 480,954 34,873 473,396
Estimate of the number
of children under the
age of 6
181,235 2,922,681 183,582 2,871,558
Table 41 - Number of State of California and Riverside County Children with Elevated
Blood Lead Levels (EBLLs) 2018-2019, Source: California Department of Public Health
Childhood Lead poisoning Prevention Branch, California Blood Lead Data 2019 and 2018
Notes for 2018-2019 BLL Data
Data are from the RASSCLE surveillance database archive of 3/2/2021. Each individual
is counted only once, using their highest blood lead level (BLL) during 2019. Measures
are in micrograms per deciliter (mcg/dL) of whole blood and include arterial, cord,
venous, capillary, and unknown samples. Not all elevated capillary samples are
confirmed by a follow-up venous sample. Results later determined to be false positive
and errors have been excluded. All results of blood lead analyses are reportable under
California law, and the State works to ensure complete reporting. Results that are not
submitted to the State, however, would not be included here. Those BLLs reported
from the analyzing laboratory as “< 5 mcg/dL” are included in the category “BLL < 4.5
mcg/dL.” Patient jurisdiction is determined by geocoding the address associated with
the child’s highest BLL using Esri’s StreetMap Premium North America locator. Data
are suppressed for local health jurisdictions that did not have enough blood lead tests
in 2019 to meet the California Health and Human Services Agency’s Data De-
Identification Guidelines for public release. The estimate of the number of children
under 6 was based on the California Department of Finance County Population
Projections by Age.
Vacant Units Suitable for
Rehabilitation
Not Suitable for
Rehabilitation Total
Vacant Units 0 0 0
Abandoned Vacant Units 0 0 0
REO Properties 0 0 0
Abandoned REO Properties 0 0 0
Table 42 - Vacant Units
Data Source: No data available.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 137
Vacant Units June 2021 June 2020 June 2019
Residential Vacant Addresses 0.3% 0.62% 0.53%
Business Vacant Addresses 15.7% 15% 13.7
All Addresses No Stat 1.18% 0.84% 0.91
Table 43
Data Source: Policy Map with Valassis Lists (accessed 12/7/21)
Need for Owner and Rental Rehabilitation
The age and condition of Temecula’s housing stock is an important indicator of
potential rehabilitation needs. Housing over 30 years of age can be presumed to need
some form of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and
plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in
terms of paint, weatherization, heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters
and finish plumbing fixtures. Housing values in Temecula have increased significantly
over a relatively short period of time. Longtime homeowners, especially the elderly
and disabled, are more likely to have fixed and limited incomes and may have
difficulty maintaining their homes.
According to 2013-2017 HUD CHAS data, over 90 percent of owner- and renter-
occupied housing in Temecula was built after 1979, making those properties 42 years
old at most, as of 2022. Nearly seven percent or 2,275 of 33,645 owner- and renter-
occupied units were built between 1950 and 1979, and less than one percent, totaling
210 units, were built before 1950. There are 9,099 households with at least one member
over the age of 62 and 2,624, or 29 percent, of those households earn at or below 80
percent of AMI, according to 2013-2017 CHAS data. There are approximately 5,940
people ages 18 to 64 with disabilities, according to 2017, ACS one-year estimates. There
are many households which could benefit from rental and housing rehab assistance
in Temecula.
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-
Income Families with LBP Hazards
Any housing built before 1978 may contain lead-based paint. If ingested, lead may
cause severe damage to young children including decreased growth, learning
disabilities, impaired hearing, hyperactivity, nerve, and brain damage. Lead attacks
the central nervous system, the neurological system, and can cause brain damage, IQ
reduction, learning disabilities, decreased attention span, hyperactivity, growth
inhibition, comas, seizures, and in some cases, death. Fetuses may also experience
significant adverse effects through prenatal exposure. Children are more susceptible
to the effects of lead because their growing bodies absorb more lead, and young
children often put their hands and other objects in their mouths. Most children do not
have any symptoms, even if a blood test shows that they have an elevated blood lead
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 138
level. If a child does have symptoms, the symptoms may be mistaken for the flu or
other illnesses.
Children under the age of five are considered most susceptible to lead poisoning. Most
of the housing stock in Temecula was built after 1979 and is presumed to not contain
lead paint. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data there were 75 renter-occupied units built at
for before 1979, with households earning less than or equal to 80 percent of AMI and
children six years of age. There were no owner-occupied units meeting the same
criteria.
Number of Children with Elevated Blood Levels of Lead
The State of California mandates lead screening for all children who participate in
publicly funded health programs. In California, screening typically occurs at ages one
and two years. A blood level of 10 µg/dL or higher was previously referred to as an
“elevated blood level (EBL).” However, as it is now recognized that there is no safe
level of lead, and adverse effects occur at levels below 10 µg/dL. Of Riverside County
children under the age of six who’s blood lead level has been tested about 2.5 percent
have level of 4.5 mcg/dL and less than one percent have blood lead levels greater than
9.5 mcg/dL.
Blood lead level testing rates are low in Riverside County and through California.
Data Source: Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Branch, CA Department of Health
Estimated Number of Housing Units Occupied by Low- or Moderate-
Income Families that Contain Lead-Based Paint Hazards
Older housing is more likely to have lead-based paint and the amount of lead pigment
in the paint tends to increase with the age of the housing. Most of Temecula’s housing
stock (72 percent) was built after 1979, when the use of lead-based paint was outlawed,
eliminating the residents of these homes from risk of lead-based paint hazards.
It is difficult to estimate with much accuracy the number of housing units occupied
by low- or moderate-income families that contain lead paint due the changing nature
of children and the transiency of renter households. The 2013-2017 CAHS data shows
75 low- and moderate income (0-80 percent of AMI) renter households with children
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 139
under the age of six lived in housing built after 1980. Given the age of this housing
stock there is a greater chance it contains lead paint.
Discussion
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units
occupied by low- and moderate-income households is a cost-effective way to invest
limited resources to retain existing housing units already affordable to low- and
moderate-income households in the community. As shown in figure 40 most
residents who participated in the city’s survey believe assistance to purchase a home
is the highest priority in their community, followed by energy efficient improvements,
and fair housing discrimination services. Alternatively, respondents to the stakeholder
survey all believe supportive services for the disables are the most highly needed in
Temecula.
Figure 40: Level of Need Housing Service
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 140
Figure 41: Highest priority Housing Service
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 141
MA-25 PUBLIC AND ASSISTED HOUSING
Introduction
As indicated in section NA-35, Temecula is within the service area of the Housing
Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR) for the purposes of Section 8 and Public
Housing. The data presented in the tables below is countywide and the narrative
responses address the needs for the entire County, with specific references to the City
of Temecula.
Program Type
Public
Housing
by
Program
Type
Mod-
Rehab Certificate
Vouchers
Total Project
-based
Tenant
-based
Special Purpose Voucher
Veterans
Affairs
Supportive
Housing
Family
Unification
Program
Disabled*
# of
units
vouchers
in use
79 456 8,748 36 8,364 135 178 19
Table 44 – Total Number of Units by Program Type
Data Source: PIC (PIH Information Center)
*Note – Data was not available on vouchers by project-based and tenant-based designation
Describe the supply of public housing developments.
HUD data provided by the Picture of Subsidized Households initiative shows at
the end of 2020, there were 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula, 129 of
which are Housing Choice Vouchers and 55 of which are Project Based Section
8. HACR monitors all units to ensure they are in adequate condition.
Describe the number and physical condition of public housing units in the
jurisdiction, including those that are participating in an approved Public
Housing Agency Plan
HACR’s Streamlined Annual PHA Plan reports the Housing Authority has received
high performer status for 17 consecutive years. This designation reflects the Housing
Authority’s most recent Public Housing Assessment System and Section Eight
Management Assessment Program results, and the number of type of units under its
management.
HUD required physical inspection scores show Rancho Family Housing, a 55-unit
development with project-based vouchers received an overall inspection score of 94c
in October 2018. The score is based on 100 points. The letters reflect health and safety
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 142
deficiencies: a, for no deficiencies, b, yes there is one or more deficiency, but none are
life-threatening, and c, for one or more life-threatening deficiency. HACR monitors all
units to ensure they are in adequate condition.
Public Housing Condition
Public Housing Development Average Inspection Score
Not Applicable Not Applicable
Table 45 - Public Housing Condition
Describe the restoration and revitalization needs of public housing units in
the jurisdiction.
There are no public housing units in Temecula. HACR uses Housing Quality Standards
for the inspection of all voucher units.
Describe the public housing agency's strategy for improving the living
environment of low- and moderate-income families residing in public
housing.
HACR works to increase assisted housing choices by expanding the supply and
improving the quality of assisted housing. The Housing Authority promotes self-
sufficiency within assisted housing programs by connecting households with various
workforce programs. HACR strives to ensure equal opportunity and affirmatively
further fair housing.
Discussion
As of September 2021, HACR assisted 8,428 households, 126 resided in Temecula in
both project-based and Housing Choice Voucher assisted units. In about 66 percent
of assisted households in Temecula the head of household identified as elderly and
44 percent as disabled. Households may identify as both elderly and disabled. HACR
monitors al units to ensure they are in adequate condition and meet the Section 8
Housing Quality Standards.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 143
MA-30 HOMELESS FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Introduction
Regionally, there are numerous facilities and services targeted to residents at-risk of
becoming homeless and experiencing homelessness, including a range of
emergency shelters, transitional shelters, and permanent supportive housing options.
HUD uses the following definitions for these three facility types:
• Emergency Shelter: Any facility, the primary purpose of which is to provide a
temporary shelter for the homeless in general or for specific populations of the
homeless and which does not require occupants to sign leases or occupancy
agreements.
• Transitional Housing: Transitional housing (TH) is designed to provide
homeless individuals and families with the interim stability and support to
successfully move to and maintain permanent housing. Transitional housing
may be used to cover the costs of up to 24 months of housing wi th
accompanying supportive services. Program participants must have a lease (or
sublease) or occupancy agreement in place when residing in transitional
housing.
• Permanent Supportive Housing: Permanent supportive housing (PSH) is
defined as community-based housing paired with supportive services to serve
households in which at least one member has a disability. Housing does not
have a designated length of stay in which formerly homeless individuals and
families live as independently as possible. Under PH, a program participant
must be the tenant on a lease (or sublease) for an initial term of at least one
year that is renewable and is terminable only for cause.
Facilities and
Housing Targeted to
Homeless
Households
Emergency Shelter
Beds
Transitional
Housing
Beds
Permanent Supportive
Housing Beds
Year-
Round
Beds
(Current &
New)
Voucher /
Seasonal
/
Overflow
Beds
Current &
New
Current
& New
Under
Development
Households with
Adult(s) and Child(ren) 310
55
42 414
-
Households with Only
Adults 505 50 1,330
Chronically Homeless
Households
N/A (data
not
available)
N/A (data not
available) 860
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 144
Facilities and
Housing Targeted to
Homeless
Households
Emergency Shelter
Beds
Transitional
Housing
Beds
Permanent Supportive
Housing Beds
Year-
Round
Beds
(Current &
New)
Voucher /
Seasonal
/
Overflow
Beds
Current &
New
Current
& New
Under
Development
Veterans 0 25 975
Unaccompanied
Youth 29 27 17
Table 46 - Facilities and Housing Targeted to Homeless Households
Data Source: 2020 Housing Inventory Chart
Describe mainstream services, such as health, mental health, and
employment services to the extent those services are used to complement
services targeted to homeless persons
In California, the primary programs for assisting families in poverty are CalWORKS,
CalFresh, and Medi-Cal. These programs provide clients with employment assistance,
discounted food, medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs
such as housing and transportation.
The California Work Opportunities for Kids (CalWORKs) program provides financial
assistance and Welfare-to-Work services to California families with little to no cash.
Through this program these families may be eligible to receive immediate short-term
help with housing, food, utilities, clothing, or medical care. Childcare is also available
through this program.
CalFresh, formerly the Food Stamp Program, is a nutritional assistance program that
provides Electronic Benefit Transfer Cards to people receiving public assistance to
purchase food and other essential items.
The Medi-Cal program provides health coverage for people with low-income and
limited ability to pay for health coverage, including seniors, disabled, young adults and
children, pregnant women, persons in a skilled nursing or intermediate care home,
and persons in the Breast and Cervical Cancer Treatment Program (BCCTP). People
receiving federally funded cash assistance programs, such as CalWORKs (a state
implementation of the federal Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
program), the State Supplementation Program (SSP) (a state supplement to the
federal Supplemental Security Income (SSI) program), foster care, adoption
assistance, certain refugee assistance programs, or In-Home Supportive Services
(IHSS) are also eligible.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 145
CDBG, HOME and ESG-Funded Activities
Congress designed the CDBG program to serve low-income people, some of which
may meet the federal poverty definition. The City of Temecula receives funding to run
CDBG programs. At least 70 percent of all CDBG funds must be used for activities that
are considered under program rules to benefit low- and moderate-income persons.
Additionally, every CDBG activity must meet one of three national objectives: benefit
low- and moderate-income persons (at least 51 percent of the beneficiaries must be
low- and moderate-income); address slums or blight; or meet a particularly urgent
community development need. CDBG programs assist the homeless and those at-
risk-of homelessness directly and indirectly.
List and describe services and facilities that meet the needs of homeless
persons, particularly chronically homeless individuals and families, families
with children, veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth. If the
services and facilities are listed on screen SP-40 Institutional Delivery
Structure or screen MA-35 Special Needs Facilities and Services, describe
how these facilities and services specifically address the needs of these
populations.
Organization Name City Description
Alternative to
Domestic Violence
County ADV Residential Shelter, Emergency Shelter,
60 beds; Residential Transitional Housing, 40
beds
Coachella Valley
Rescue Mission
County County Overnight and Gateway Shelter,
Emergency Shelters, 345 beds
Riverside University
Health System,
Department of
Behavioral Health
County Hotel/Motel Voucher Program, Emergency
Shelter, 46; Coachella Valley PH "The Path"(25
beds), HHOPE Permanent Housing (103 beds),
Men's Permanent Housing (22 beds), Riverside
PH "The Place" (25 beds)
Department of Public
Social Services
County State HDAP Emergency Team, Emergency
Shelter, 30 beds; State HDAP Rapid rehousing,
3 beds
Martha’s Village and
Kitchen, Inc.
Indio Renewing Hope, Emergency Shelter, 120 beds
Operation Safe House County,
Riverside &
Thousand
Palms
Safe House – Desert, Riverside and Main STAY
Emergency Shelters, 28 beds, Main Street
Transitional Living Program and OSH Harrison
House Transitional Living Program, 27 beds
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 146
Organization Name City Description
Path of Life Ministries
Inc
Riverside &
County
City of Riverside Year-Round Shelter & CVAG
W. Valley Navigation, Family and Cold
Weather, Emergency Shelters, 210 beds; Path
of Life Rapid Rehousing & East County (14
beds)
Shelter from the Storm Palm Desert Mary Stuart Rogers Center, Emergency
Shelter, 20 beds
Valley Restart Shelter
Inc.
Hemet Restart Center, Emergency Shelter, 35 beds
Help for Future
Leaders
Palm Desert Transitional Housing for Veterans, 13 beds
Lighthouse Social
Service Centers
Moreno Valley,
Riverside &
County
Transitional Living Services for Veterans, 12
beds; Lighthouse SSC Permanent Housing for
Disabled Women with Children (36 beds) &
Lighthouse Riverside PSH (29 beds); SSC Rapid
Rehousing & LSSC Renewal SSVF Program (66
beds)
City of Riverside Riverside Riverside PSH - Chronically Homeless &
Disabled (25 beds); Rapid Re-Housing (17 beds)
County Housing
Authority
County Enhanced Housing, Shelter plus care (13 beds),
Housing Authority (161 beds), and VASH - Vet
Assisted Supportive Housing project (96 beds)-
and tenant-based (161); Rapid re-housing
CalWORKS Housing Support (151 beds)
Jewish Family Services County PSH Consolidation 107 beds
Stepping Up on
Second Street, Inc.
County Stepping Up in Riverside 92 beds
US Vets County US Vets SSVF Rapid Re-Housing 33 beds
Project T.O.U.C.H Temecula Homeless prevention and shared housing
Table 47: Homeless Service Providers for the City of Temecula
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 147
MA-35 SPECIAL NEEDS FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Introduction
Special needs populations include persons who are not homeless, but due to various
reasons need services and supportive housing. The City of Temecula will consider
allocating CDBG public service funding to programs that provide services to special
needs populations, including but not limited to those serving the elderly, frail elderly,
developmentally disabled, physically disabled, mentally disabled, alcohol or substance
abusers, persons with HIV/AIDS, victims of domestic violence, victims of human
trafficking and veterans with PTSD or other needs.
Elderly is defined under the CDBG program as a person who is 62 years of age or older.
A frail elderly person is an elderly person who is unable to independently perform at
least three “activities of daily living” including eating, bathing, grooming or home
management activities. Based on 2013-2017 CHAS data of the 9,099 households
containing at least one elderly person in Temecula, nearly 29 percent (2,624
households) earn less than 80 percent of the AMI for Riverside County. According to
ACS data in 2017 there were approximately 4,665 people over the age of 65 living in
Temecula. Within this age category nearly 60 percent of people had ambulatory and
independent living difficulty and 25 percent had difficulty with self-care.
People with disabilities which include a physical or mental impairment that
substantially limits one or more major life activities generally rely on supportive
services to perform activities of daily living. The Civilian Noninstitutionalized
Population age 18 and to 64 in Temecula includes 67,915 individuals, an estimated
5,940 of whom have a disability (ACS, 2017 1-year estimates). Of those who have a
disability 38 percent have cognitive difficulty, 35 percent have ambulatory difficulty,
30 percent have a hearing difficulty, 27 percent have an independent living difficulty,
17 percent have a vision difficulty and nine percent have a self-care difficulty. Over 55
percent of disabled people in Temecula are employed, and 42 percent are not in the
labor force.
Drug abuse or substance abuse is defined as the use of chemical substances that lead
to an increased risk of problems and an inability to control the use of the substance.
Substance abuse can be indicative addiction disorder and may stem from physical
and mental health issues. The U.S. Department of He alth and Human Services’
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) conducts the
National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). Based on the survey SAMHSA
found, for the region including Riverside and Imperial counties:
• three percent of people needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty
facility for illicit drug use
• six percent of people needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility
for alcohol use in the last year, and
• 7.5 percent needed but did not receive treatment at a specialty facility for
substance use in the past year.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 148
Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) is a virus that weakens one’s immune system
by destroying important cells that fight diseases and infection. Acquired Immune
Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is the final stage of HIV. The Center for Disease Control’s
(CDC) Atlas Plus program reported an estimated 9,414 persons living with HIV disease
at the end of 2019 in Riverside County, 268 of those people had been newly diagnosed
during that year (https://www.cdc.gov/nchhstp/atlas/index.htm, accessed October
2021). New HIV diagnoses were most concentrated among those 25 to 34 years of age.
Domestic Violence includes, but is not limited to, felony or misdemeanor crimes of
violence committed by a current or former spouse of the victim or by a person who is
cohabitating with or has cohabited with the victim. In 2020, the Temecula Police
Department responded to a total of 213 calls related to domestic violence
(openjustice.doj.ca.gov, accessed September 2021). Of these domestic incidents, 20
involved a weapon and 193 did not.
Human trafficking is a crime that involves the forceful, fraudulent or coercive
methods of entrapping a person, real or perceived, to exploit them for financial gain.
The exploitative nature can come in the form of labor services, involuntary servitude,
enslavement, debt bondage or commercial sex acts. Human trafficking is extremely
difficult to track; there is no recent or reliable prevalence rate to report. Between 2015
and 2019, the National Human Trafficking Hotline received the most calls from
California, of all 50 states (https://humantraffickinghotline.org/ accessed October
2021). Of national cases reported to the hotline the majority were sex trafficking. The
United States’ Department of State Trafficking in Persons Report published in June
2021, reports victims of human trafficking found in every state in the country and
victims trafficked from every country in the world. Victims of human trafficking in the
United States are most frequently trafficked from within the United States, Mexico,
and Honduras.
The National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) explains Post-traumatic Stress
Disorder (PTSD) can “develop after exposure to a potentially traumatic event that is
beyond a typical stressor” and potential inducing events may include, but are not
limited to, “violent personal assaults, natural or human-caused disasters, accidents,
combat, and other forms of violence.” Symptoms of PTSD can be debilitating. The U.S.
Department of Veteran’s Affairs National Center for PTSD reports an estimated six
percent of the population – eight percent of women and four percent of men – will
have PTSD at some point in their lives.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 149
Including the elderly, frail elderly, persons with disabilities (mental,
physical, developmental), persons with alcohol or other drug addictions,
persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, public housing residents and any
other categories the jurisdiction may specify and describe their supportive
housing needs.
To determine the level of need and types of services needed by special needs
populations, the City conducted surveys, consulted with local service providers and
reviewed ACS and CHAS data. Supportive services required for special needs
populations include case management, medical or psychological counseling and
supervision, childcare, transportation, and job training provided for the purpose of
facilitating a person’s stability and independence.
In housing, accessibility modifications to accommodate persons with mobility
disabilities may include, but are not limited to, wider doorways, no step thresholds,
installation of ramps, grab bars, lowered countertops, and accessible hardware. The
needs of residents with sensory disabilities are different from those with mobility
disabilities. Individuals with hearing disabilities require visual adaptations for such
items as the telephone ringer, the doorbell and smoke alarms. Residents who are
blind may require tactile marking of changes in floor level and stair edges and braille
markings on appliances and controls. People with low vision may require large print
markings and displays, contrasting colors to distinguish changes in level or transition
from one area to another, proper lighting, and reduced glare from lighting and
windows.
Describe programs for ensuring that persons returning from mental and
physical health institutions receive appropriate supportive housing
Inadequate discharge planning and coordination contributes to homelessness in
situations where people are released from public institutions or public systems of care
without having an appropriate mainstream or supportive housing option in place.
A key step to preventing homelessness identified in the Riverside County Executive
Oversight Committee on Homelessness’ report Ending Homeless in Riverside County
(2018) is to develop a coordinated discharge planning system for persons transitioning
from care or case management of one department to another. The goal calls for the
CoC to explore methods to increase communication and coordination among
institutions.
In some cases, licensed community care facilities provide a supportive housing
environment to persons with special needs in a group setting. According to the
California Department of Social Services Community Care Licensing Division, there 19
licenses assisted living facilities in Temecula providing a total 513 beds, as of October
2021.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 150
For entitlement/consortia grantees: Specify the activities that the
jurisdiction plans to undertake during the next year to address the housing
and supportive services needs identified in accordance with 91.215(e) with
respect to persons who are not homeless but have other special needs.
Link to one-year goals.
During the 2022-2026 Consolidated Plan period, the Strategic Plan calls for the City to
use CDBG funds to support public services for people with special needs services
including, but not limited to those serving the elderly, children, veterans, and victims
of violence. In the 2022-2023 Action Plan, the City will provide CDBG funds to the
following activities addressing special needs populations:
Elderly and Disabled
• Hospice of the Valleys, Senior Assistance Program (41 people assisted) –
public services funds
Domestic Violence
• Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center, Crisis intervention and supportive services
for trauma survivors (13 people assisted) – public service funds
• SAFE Family Justice Centers, Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families (73 people
assisted)
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 151
MA-40 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Negative Effects of Public Policies on Affordable Housing and Residential
Investment
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that
constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can
include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements,
environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable
housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that
barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of
Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and
market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are
• housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable
housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and
• housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the
supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable
housing resulting in renter households – and to a disproportionate extent Black,
Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing
conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and
plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distances from employment
centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates
and high exposure to poverty.
As Temecula’s population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs
of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English
proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population
and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of
California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and
preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change
impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are
mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former
Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 152
MA-45 NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ASSETS
Introduction
Non-housing community development needs include economic development and
improvements to public facilities. Special economic development activities must
meet a National Object by addressing low- or moderate-income residents, slum/
blight, or urgent need and be an eligible activity per 24 CFR 570.203. Public facilities
assisted with CDBG must serve low- and moderate-income residents or those
residents presumed by HUD to be low- and moderate-income. Such facilities include
senior centers, community centers, facilities for victims of domestic violence, facilities
for treatment of persons with HIV/AIDS, and ADA improvements to public facilities
throughout the City. During the implementation of the 2022-2026 Strategic Plan, the
City will use CDBG funds to develop the local economy and address these needs and
provide a suitable living environment for low- and moderate-income people.
To expand economic opportunities for low- and moderate-income people and
provide a pathway out of poverty, the Strategic Plan and the 2022-2023 Annual Action
Plan includes public services programs. These programs include youth support by the
Assistance League of Temecula Valley providing clothing and supplies to low-income
students in TVUSD, the Boys and Girls Club of Southwest County providing before and
after school care to students, and Voice providing case management and advocacy
for foster children in Temecula. Further projects include housing counseling, case
management and subsistence payments for the homeless and those at risk of
homelessness, and services for the elderly and victims of violence.
There are several organizations that promote economic development in the Temecula
Valley. The City participates with four other cities in the region in the Economic
Development Coalition of Southwest California. The Corporation was founded in 1991
as a public-private partnership to promote a regional approach to economic
development through job retention and development by increasing job opportunities
for residents. Its mission is to expand the competitive position of the regional
businesses in a global economy. The Temecula Valley Entrepreneurs Exchange (TVE2)
is a business incubator and regional center that works with new businesses starting
up. The Chamber of Commerce, the Old Town Temecula Business Association and
the Temecula Valley Winegrowers Association represent the various segments of the
business community. The Uptown Temecula Specific Plan was designed to spur
development and business opportunities in the Jefferson Corridor area.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 153
Economic Development Market Analysis
Business Activity by Sector
Number
of
Workers
Number
of Jobs
Share of
Workers
Share of
Jobs
Jobs
less
Workers
Agriculture, Mining, Oil & Gas 821 374 3% 1% -2%
Arts, Entertainment, Accommodations 4,550 6,842 14% 17% 3%
Construction 3,096 3,249 10% 8% -2%
Education and Health Care Services 5,670 5,681 18% 14% -4%
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate 1,788 1,879 6% 5% -1%
Information 716 945 2% 2% 0%
Manufacturing 3,448 4,858 11% 12% 1%
Other Services 1,210 1,469 4% 4% 0%
Professional, Scientific, Management 2,947 3,041 9% 8% -1%
Public Administration 0 0 0% 0% 0%
Retail Trade 4,055 8,001 13% 20% 7%
Transportation and Warehousing 1,271 540 4% 1% -3%
Wholesale Trade 1,892 2,838 6% 7% 1%
Total 31,464 39,735 -- -- --
Table 48 - Business Activity
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS (Workers), 2017 Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics (Jobs)
Labor Force Statistics Number of People
Total Population in the Civilian Labor Force 54,340
Civilian Employed Population 16 years and over 50,245
Unemployment Rate 7.55
Unemployment Rate for Ages 16-24 19.01
Unemployment Rate for Ages 25-65 4.51
Table 49 - Labor Force
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Occupations by Sector Number of People
Management, business and financial 13,820
Farming, fisheries and forestry occupations 1,735
Service 5,735
Sales and office 12,075
Construction, extraction, maintenance and repair 3,445
Production, transportation and material moving 2,255
Table 50 – Occupations by Sector
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 154
Travel Time to Work People Percent
< 30 Minutes 24,190 53%
30-59 Minutes 10,675 23%
60 or More Minutes 11,140 24%
Total 46,005 100%
Table 51 - Travel Time
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment
In Labor Force Not in Labor
Force Civilian
Employed Unemployed
Less than high school graduate 2,270 205 1,375
High school graduate (includes
equivalency) 7,685 525 3,060
Some college or Associate's degree 16,630 1,195 5,175
Bachelor's degree or higher 15,400 670 2,725
Table 52 - Educational Attainment by Employment Status (Population 16 and Older)
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment by Age
Age
18–24
yrs
25–34
yrs
35–44
yrs
45–65
yrs
65+ yrs
Less than 9th grade 85 180 440 955 620
9th to 12th grade, no diploma 1,000 500 785 990 715
High school graduate, GED, or
alternative 3,960 3,195 2,905 5,390 2,745
Some college, no degree 3,950 4,370 4,385 8,530 3,165
Associate's degree 550 1,505 1,360 3,215 990
Bachelor's degree 785 3,200 3,680 5,480 1,815
Graduate or professional degree 100 1,080 1,605 3,980 1,375
Table 53 - Educational Attainment by Age
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
Educational Attainment Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months
Less than high school graduate $39,663
High school graduate (includes equivalency) $152,742
Some college or Associate's degree $181,620
Bachelor's degree $249,279
Graduate or professional degree $377,121
Table 54 – Median Earnings in the Past 12 Months by Educational Attainment
Data Source: 2013-2017 ACS
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 155
Based on the Business Activity table above, what are the major
employment sectors within your jurisdiction?
According to 2017 Longitudinal Employer Household Dynamics (LEHD) data, the top
five major private employment sectors in the City of Temecula include retail trade
(8,001 jobs), arts, entertainment, and accommodations (6,842 jobs), education and
health care services (5,681 jobs), manufacturing (4,858 jobs), and construction (3,249
jobs).
Describe the workforce and infrastructure needs of the business
community
The business community in Temecula relies largely on a skilled workforce. Residents
of Temecula identified employment training as the greatest need and highest priority
in the city. Employers across all sectors, and especially those for which Temecula is a
destination location or part of a larger logistics chain such as arts, entertainment and
accommodations and manufacturing, require a well-functioning transportation
system. At most, almost 29 percent of stakeholder believe small business loans/ grants
and assistance of highly needed in Temecula.
Figure 42: Resident Survey, Level of need for Business Services
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 156
Figure 43: Resident Survey, Highest Priority Business Services
Describe any major changes that may have an economic impact, such as
planned local or regional public or private sector investments or initiatives
that have affected or may affect job and business growth opportunities
during the planning period. Describe any needs for workforce
development, business support or infrastructure these changes may
create.
The coronavirus pandemic has had a major and sustained impact on all sectors of the
economy. It has both highlighted and increased the need for fast, reliable, and secure
internet has increased across all sectors of the economy.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief,
and Economic Security (CARES) Act. The Act authorized $.2.2 trillion to prevent,
prepare for, and respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. The City of Temecula received a
total of $1,193,916 in CARES Act funds. The City of Temecula was able to help over 30
small businesses with these funds through the Temecula Assist Program.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 157
How do the skills and education of the current workforce correspond to
employment opportunities in the jurisdiction?
Most employees in Temecula’s civilian labor force have some post-secondary
education, approximately 40 percent have some college or Associate’s degree.
Generally. The skills and education of the current workforce correspond to the
employment opportunities in the City. Of the sectors in the Business Activity table,
just over half had more jobs than workers. The greatest demand for workers in the
retail sector. More than half the working population in Temecula travel less than half
an hour to work while nearly a quarter travel an hour or more to work.
Describe any current workforce training initiatives, including those
supported by Workforce Investment Boards, community colleges and
other organizations. Describe how these efforts will support the
jurisdiction's Consolidated Plan.
Riverside County Workforce Development Centers (WDC) are the primary source of
workforce training available to residents of Temecula. The WDC is operated by
America’s Job Centers of California. The Riverside County Workforce Development
Board provides strategic direction and relationships for the WDC. The City of
Temecula works with the Riverside County WCD and employers to secure on-the-job
training when appropriate.
To foster growth of the high value tech sector the City together with the Economic
Development Coalition of Southwest California, Inland Empire Small Business
Development Center, Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce, Mt. San Jacinto
College (MSJC), and Cal State San Marcos at Temecula (CSSMU) came together in 2013,
to launch and operate the Temecula Valley Entrepreneur Exchange (TVE2).
MSJC opened a new state of the art campus in Temecula in the fall of 2021. This is a
milestone for the region, as it is the first permanent campus of higher education in
southwest Riverside County. This will improve access to skilled training and higher
education for students and employers in the area.
Does your jurisdiction participate in a Comprehensive Economic
Development Strategy (CEDS)?
The City of Temecula was included as part of the CEDS prepared by the Riverside
County Workforce Development Board (WDB) for 2019-2024. Every five years, the
Riverside County WDB develops the CEDS for the region to present the current
condition of the Riverside County economy and its impact on residents and
businesses. The analysis identifies strength, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to
the regional economy by considering indicators such as unemployment, income, and
education as well as infrastructure, business activity and economic competitiveness
relative to other markets.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 158
If so, what economic development initiatives are you undertaking that may
be coordinated with the Consolidated Plan? If not, describe other
local/regional plans or initiatives that impact economic growth.
The City of Temecula’s CDBG program will support local economic growth by meeting
extremely low-, low- and moderate-income and homeless residents where they are to
improve quality of life and better position for access and engagement in economic
opportunities. This will be achieved by supporting local nonprofit service providers,
including housing services, and support of the development and preservation of
affordable housing.
Discussion
The highly contagious nature of COVID-19 and the scale of illness and death has had
significant ripple effects on the economy. In the spring of 2020, unemployment rates
in the United States reached the highest levels since the United States Bureau of
Labor Statistics (BLS) began recording this data. According to the BLS,
unemployment rates peaked at 16 percent in Riverside County and at 17 percent in
Temecula in April 2020. While those rates have fallen to 7.6 percent and 5.8 percent,
respectively, as of August 2021, unemployment is still above pre-pandemic levels.
Health and safety guidelines and requirements continue to change as the coronavirus
evolves and the scientific community learns more about the virus. Employers and
workers are required to constantly learn and reevaluate changing situations.
Another indication of the negative economic impact of the pandemic is the year over
year decrease in California of personal consumption expenditures of over four percent
from 2019 to 2020, as calculated by the Department of Commerce’s Bureau of
Economic Analysis (BEA). The BEA calculated pre-pandemic growth in Riverside
County’s gross domestic product, as $85 million in 2017 to $96 million in 2019. However,
State level calculations, which are more current, show the negative economic impact
cause by the pandemic. According to the BEA, in 2020, California GPD fell for the first
time in ten years.
Sectors of the economy such as arts and entertainment, tourism, and retail have been
severely impacted by the pandemic. Prior to COVID-19 Temecula was experiencing a
relatively fast rate of growth in accommodation and food service as well as arts,
entertainment, and recreation. While employment in the retail sector had plateaued,
it accounted for a large percentage of jobs prior to the pandemic and a significant
number of jobs losses since the pandemic. Generally, jobs in these sectors have
relatively low barriers to entry and pay lower wages. Extremely low- and low-income
individuals and households in Temecula are facing even more tenuous situations than
they before the pandemic. The City of Temecula is working closely with partners to
release COVID relief funds as quickly as possible to assist eligible residents.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 159
Figure 44
Data Source: California Employment Development Department, Industry Employment in California Counties
Data
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 160
MA-50 NEEDS AND MARKET ANALYSIS DISCUSSION
Are there areas where households with multiple housing problems are
concentrated? (include a definition of “concentration”)
Concentrations of individual housing problems are defined as ten percent over the
rate at which one or more housing problems occurs throughout the C ity as a whole,
based on CHAS 2013-2017 data. The threshold rate is 28.3 percent. There are four
contiguous census tracts in the northwestern quadrant of the City where there is a
concentration of housing problems these can be seen in Figure.
Are there any areas in the jurisdiction where racial or ethnic minorities or
low-income families are concentrated? (include a definition of
“concentration”)
Concentration of racial and ethnicity minorities and low-income are defined as ten
percent over the rate at which those variables occur throughout the City as a whole.
The threshold rates for each are as follows:
• Racial and ethnic minorities: 57.6 percent, and
• Low-income 31.3 percent.
There are two complete census tracts and a third census tract, most of which falls
outside of Temecula where there is a concentration of racial and ethnic minorities.
These census tracts are not adjacent. One of the census tracts, near the center of the
City, is also identified as having a concentration of multiple housing problems and
low-income. There are a total of four census tracts where a concentration of
households have low-income. Those census tracts are contiguous and households in
three of those census tracts also have concentrations of multiple housing problems.
These concentrations are illustrated in Figure 46 and Figure 47.
What are the characteristics of the market in these areas/neighborhoods?
Generally, Temecula is comprised of predominantly White and upper-income
neighborhoods. In 51 percent of the census tracts over half the population is white and
in no census tracts are below 30 percent of the population white. There are no census
tracts where fewer than 60 percent of households earn greater than 80 percent of
AMI. The housing and economic indicators are generally consistent throughout the
city.
Are there any community assets in these areas/neighborhoods?
No communities were identified as having concentrations of housing problems, racial
or ethnic minorities or majorities, or low-income. Each neighborhood throughout the
City contains its own unique community assets including open space, trails,
recreational areas, schools, job centers, retail, and restaurants.
Are there other strategic opportunities in any of these areas?
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 161
No communities were identified as having concentrations of housing problems, racial
or ethnic minorities or majorities, or low-income. There are no readily apparent
strategic opportunities to be addressed with CDBG, funds specific to any of these
neighborhoods.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 162
Figure 45: Concentration of households with multiple housing problems
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 163
Figure 46: Concentration of racial and ethnic minorities
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 164
Figure 47: Concentration of households with low-income
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 165
MA-60 BROADBAND NEEDS OF HOUSING OCCUPIED BY
LOW- AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSEHOLDS
Describe the need for broadband wiring and connections for households,
including low- and moderate-income households and neighborhoods.
Broadbandnow.com is a widely used source of information about internet availability
throughout the county and reports Temecula residents have several options for
broadband internet service. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)
mapping service, Fixed Broadband Deployment, shows at least two providers offer
ADSL, Cable or Fiber connections to over 98 percent of residential households with
downstream/upstream speeds of 100/10 megabits per second (mbps). According to
broadbandnow.com, the average download speed in Temecula is 166.0 mbps, based
on speed tests conducted over the last 12 months.
The City of Temecula currently offers free WiFi in almost all City buildings. To stem
learning loss caused by the need for remote learning due to COVID-19 and
compounded by the digital divide, the City of Temecula and Temecula Valley Unified
School Department (TVUSD) partnered to develop WiFi gardens. These are places
where students can access high speed WiFi at no cost. Additionally, TVUSD provided
MiFi wireless hotspots to students upon request by a parent or guardian.
The City of Temecula’s Resident Survey included four questions to provide deeper
insight into broadband internet access in the community. Of the 126 respondents, 113
had broadband internet access, most of those people have cable or phone/ fiber optic,
don’t know the speed of their service, and pay between $76 to $100 per month for the
service.
Figure 48 Resident Survey, Broadband Internet Access
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 166
Figure 49: Resident Survey, Type of Broadband Internet Access
Figure 50: Resident Survey, Speed of Broadband Internet Access
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 167
Figure 51: Resident Survey, Cost of Broadband Internet Access
Describe the need for increased competition by having more than one
broadband Internet service provider serve the jurisdiction.
According to the FCC, 99.65 percent of Temecula households have access to at least
two wired internet providers at their address. Throughout the City, residents are
serviced by multiple internet service providers who offer high speed internet.
Providers include, Earthlink, Spectrum, Viasat Internet, HughesNet, Frontier
Communications and Southern California Telephone Company. Verizon, T-Mobile,
and AT&T have indicated plans to offer highspeed (5G) wireless internet access soon.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 168
MA-65 HAZARD MITIGATION
Describe the jurisdiction’s increased natural hazard risks associated with
climate change.
Climate change has increased the prevalence and severity of natural hazard risks
including drought, flash floods/storms, and extreme heat events in Temecula. Intense
dry seasons and wind conditions during the fall months have contributed to wildfires
in the hills in and around Temecula in recent years, which threaten lives and property,
damage local ecosystems, and negatively impact air quality.
Temecula has a history of environmental stewardship, placing sustainability, energy
and water conservation, and green building techniques among the City’s highest
priorities. In recent decades, City Council Resolutions demonstrate Temecula’s
commitment to open space, clean air, and modern building standards with the
annexation of the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve, green building, and clean air.
The City has adopted the latest California Green Codes and added new solar facilities.
Temecula is in the process of updating its General Plan, which will include an updated
Climate Action Plan. The City purchases clean, renewable, local energy produced at
the Santa Margarita Ecological Reserve Research 1 Solar project. This defrays costs to
the city and residents and displaces over 4.5 metric tons of cardon dioxide annually.
Since 2008, the City Council has had a standing committee on sustainability and the
City’s Green Building resolution requires all new construction of City facilities to be
designed and built to achieve U.S. Green Building Council’s (USGBC) LEES Certified
Standard.
Describe the vulnerability of housing occupied by low- and moderate-
income households to these risks.
Most of the respondents to the Resident Survey feel somewhat prepared for a disaster
(Figure 52). Low- and moderate-income residents and special needs populations are
especially vulnerable to the risks of climate-related hazards. The residences of low-
and moderate-income households are more often in worse condition and thus are
more susceptible to external weather conditions such as extreme heat. Likewise,
elderly residents are at a greater risk during extreme weather events such as extreme
heat events.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 169
Figure 52: Resident Survey, Disaster Preparedness
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 170
Strategic Plan
SP-05 OVERVIEW
Temecula was built upon a strong base of civic participation. In 1989, when the City
was incorporated, it was a small bedroom community. It has evolved and experienced
significant growth in population and economic activity since then.
The Strategic Plan is a guide for the City of Temecula to establish its housing,
community and economic development priorities, strategies, and goals for the
investment of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds from HUD over
the next five years, beginning July 1, 2022, and ending June 30, 2026. The priority needs
and goals established in this Strategic Plan are based on analysis of information
including the results of the City’s 2022 Consolidated Plan Needs Assessment Resident
Survey and housing and community development data elements required by HUD in
the online Consolidated Plan system (the eCon Planning Suite) from the 2013-2017
American Community Survey (ACS) 5-Year Estimates and the Comprehensive
Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) covering the same period. Additional sources
of information used to identify needs and establish priorities were obtained through
consultation with local nonprofit agencies involved in the development of affordable
housing and the delivery of public services to low- and moderate-income people,
persons with special needs and those at risk of homelessness.
In consideration of community input and available data, the five priority needs listed
below are established as part of this Strategic Plan.
• Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure.
• Promote the development of affordable housing
• Preserve the existing housing stock
• Provide public services for low and moderate income, special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents.
• Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness.
Consistent with HUD’s national goals for the CDBG program to provide decent
housing opportunities, maintain a suitable living environment and expand economic
opportunities for low- and moderate-income residents, the priority needs listed above
will be addressed over the next five years through the implementation of CDBG-
funded activities aligned with the following nine measurable Strategic Plan goals as
elaborated in Section SP-45:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 171
Goal Name Category Need(s) Addressed Goal Outcome
Indicator
1 Public facilities
and
infrastructure
improvements
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Improve
neighborhoods, public
facilities, and
infrastructure
Public facility or
infrastructure
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 20,000
people assisted
2. Affordable
Housing
Development
Affordable
Housing
Promote
development of
affordable housing
Rental units
constructed 80
housing units
3. Housing
Preservation
Affordable
Housing
Preserve the existing
housing stock
Homeowner
housing rehabbed
30 households
4. Services for low-
and moderate-
income residents
Public Services Provide public services
for low- and
moderate-income,
special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit 2,000 people
assisted
5. Services for
residents with
special needs,
including seniors
and veterans
Public Services Provide public services
for low- and
moderate-income,
special needs, seniors,
and veteran residents
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 375 people
assisted
6. Services for the
homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
Homeless Provide public services
for the homeless and
those at risk of
homelessness
Public service
activities other than
low-/moderate-
income housing
benefit: 325 people
assisted
Table 55 - Strategic Plan Summary
Historically, the City of Temecula has used CDBG funding to support activities that
meet one of the aforementioned goals or similar goals established in the prior
Consolidated Plan. Over the next five years, the City will continue to support public
services through CDBG public service grants and other local funds that meet the goals
of this Strategic Plan.
The City has established the following priority ranking system for housing and
community development activities to be funded over the next five years:
• High Priority: Activities meeting a high priority Strategic Plan Goal are
expected to be funded during the 2022-2026 period.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 172
• Low Priority: Activities meeting a low priority Strategic Plan Goal may be
considered for funding if sufficient funds are available after high priority
activities are funded, up to but not exceeding the five-year goal outcome
indicator set forth in this Strategic Plan.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 173
SP-10 GEOGRAPHIC PRIORITIES
Describe the basis for allocating investments geographically within the
jurisdiction (or within the EMSA for HOPWA)
According to data from the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
in HUD’s eCon Planning Suite for the Consolidated Plan, the City's household median
income is $87,115. Evaluation of maps generated through HUD's Community Planning
and Development mapping system (CPD Maps) reveals that each of the Census Tracts
in the City of Temecula has a median household income of at least $42,880, about 50
percent of AMI.
HUD allows CDBG grantees to implement certain activities such as initial construction
or expansion of community facilities and infrastructure that benefit certain
neighborhoods or villages (but not the entire City) provided that the entire service
area for the facility or infrastructure is primarily residential and where at least 51
percent of residents are low- and moderate-income.
As a more recently incorporated City, Temecula neighborhoods do not face the same
problems as older cities. There are, however, infrastructure and public facilities within
older subdivisions of Temecula and areas with high concentrations of multi-family
housing which would benefit from upgrades or expansion, especially in complying
with federal changes to accessibility requirements.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 174
SP-25 PRIORITY NEEDS
Priority Need Promote the development of affordable housing
Priority Level Low
Population Extremely Low-; Low-; Moderate
Geographic Areas Citywide
Associated Goals Affordable housing development
Description Create new housing affordable to extremely low-, low- and
moderate-income households. through development of
subsidized rental housing.
Basis for Relative Priority According to ACS and CHAS data, 6,070 households earning 0-
80 percent of AMI are cost burdened— meaning those
households pay more than 30 percent of income for housing
costs and 4,645 households are severely cost burdened—
meaning they pay more than 50 percent of income for housing
costs. Of the severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are
renters and most (2,150 households) earn less than 50 percent
of AMI and are considered the most at risk of becoming
homeless.
The development of rental housing units affordable for low- and
moderate-income households is rated as the highest priority
need because over 53 percent of the City's households that earn
less than 50 percent of AMI are renters who experience a severe
cost burden, making these households the most at risk of
homelessness. Additionally, responses to the 2022 Consolidated
Plan Survey indicate the significant need for additional
affordable housing units in Temecula.
Priority Need Preserve the existing housing stock
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
Geographic Areas Citywide
Associated Goals Housing preservation
Description As the City's housing stock ages, a growing percentage of
housing units may need rehabilitation to allow them to remain
safe and habitable. Low- and moderate-income homeowners,
as well as owners of multi-family properties, may not be
financially positioned to properly maintain their investments.
Homeowners and renters who have fixed incomes may struggle
to keep up their homes and be unable afford an increase to their
rent.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 175
Basis for Relative Priority The age and condition of Temecula’s housing stock is an
important indicator of potential rehabilitation needs. Over 90
percent of housing in Temecula has been constructed since
1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form
of major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation
work and plumbing systems. Housing over 20 years of age will
generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of paint, weatherization,
heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish
plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were
built categorized by owner and renter tenure:
Built 2000 or later 8,290 or 38 percent of the 21,600 owner-
occupied housing units
Built 1980-1999 11,920 or 55 percent of the 21,600-owner
occupied housing unit
Built 2000 or later 4,900 or 41 percent of the 12,045 renter-
occupied housing units
Built 1980-1999 6,050 or 50 percent of the 12,045 renter occupied
housing units
Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing
housing units occupied by low- and moderate-income
households is a cost-effective way to invest limited resources to
retain existing housing units that are already affordable to low-
and moderate-income households in the community. Housing
rehabilitation and energy efficiency improvements together
were high priority housing service reported by the Consolidated
Plan Resident Survey.
Priority Need Provide public services for low- and moderate-income, special
needs, and veteran residents.
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate;
Elderly; Veteran; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Persons with
Physical Disabilities; Persons with Developmental Disabilities;
Persons with Alcohol or Other Addictions; Persons with
HIV/AIDS and their Families; Victims of Domestic Violence
Geographic Areas Citywide
Associated Goals Services for low- and moderate-income residents
Services for residents with special needs, including seniors and
veterans
Description The City of Temecula holds this as a high prio rity and will
support CDBG public service activities which help support
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 176
residents with low- and moderate-income and special needs,
including seniors and veterans, as individuals and families, with
individual and group development. This priority will be
addressed with CDBG and other public funds along with
contributions from the private sector.
Basis for Relative Priority The City of Temecula Strategic Plan for calls for a range of
services for residents with low- and moderate-income and
special needs, including seniors and veterans, as a high priority
of the City. Analysis of available data and the Consolidated Plan
Resident Survey revealed a high need for a range of additional
services including, but not limited to, mental health services,
services for abused and neglected children, healthcare services,
services for survivors of domestic violence, services for persons
with disabilities, substance abuse services, services for survivors
of sexual assault, persons with HIV/AIDS, and other conditions.
The top five high priority public services, according to the 2022
Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, are as follows: anti-crime
program, mental health, homeless, transportation, and
childcare services. Consultation with organizations providing
services to seniors and veterans revealed a high need for a
range of additional services. These needs will be addressed with
CDBG and other public fund along with contributions from the
private sector.
There were 7,600 low- and moderate-income residents of
Temecula, including an estimated 4,185 residents with incomes
at 50 percent of the federal poverty level (ACS 2017, 5-year
estimates).
Approximately 18 percent of Riverside and Imperial County
residents had mental illness and only about 12 percent of
residents received mental health services, and over seven
percent of residents needed but did not receive treatment at a
specialty facility for substance abuse, in 2017 (SAMHSA).
In 2020, 213 calls reporting domestic violence were made by
residents of Temecula to law enforcement (State of California
Department of Justice, OpenJustice).
According to the 2013-2017 ACS data, 11,519 residents of
Temecula over the age of 18 have one or more disability.
As of 2019, 9,414 know they carry HIV and of those 268 were
newly diagnosed the same year (U.S. Centers for Disease
Control, Atlas Plus).
Priority Need Provide public services to the homeless and those at risk of
homelessness
Priority Level High
Population Extremely Low; Low; Moderate
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 177
Chronic Homelessness; Individuals; Families with Children;
Mentally Ill; Veterans; Persons with HIV/AIDS
Geographic Areas Citywide
Associated Goals Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Description The City of Temecula holds this a high priority and will support
CDBG public service activities which help prevent
homelessness and that support efforts for a structured path to
stable housing for individuals and families who become
homeless.
Basis for Relative Priority According to the results of the most recent data available from
the 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count (PIT Count), on any
given night in Riverside County, approximately 2,884 people are
homeless. To address incidences of homelessness in Temecula
and to prevent extremely low-income families from becoming
homeless, the City places a high priority on programs that
provide homelessness prevention, street outreach, and rapid re-
housing services.
Homeless services were identified by residents in the 2022
Consolidated Plan survey and in consultation with community
stakeholders as both in high need and a high priority. This
priority will be addressed with CDBG and other public funds
along with contributions from the private sector.
Priority Need Improve neighborhood public facilities and infrastructure
Priority Level High
Population Non-housing Community Development
Geographic Areas Local target area
Citywide
Associated Goals Public facilities and infrastructure improvements
Description Public facility and infrastructure improvements, including
removal of architectural barriers for public right of ways in
roadways, public facilities.
Basis for Relative Priority In consultation with the City of Temecula Public Works
Department and the Community Services Department, a high
level of need exists for activities such as public facilities
improvements (including ADA improvements throughout the
City) and infrastructure improvements.
Based on need and available resources and results of the 2022
Consolidated Plan Needs Resident Survey and input from
community workshops and consultations, the improvement of
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 178
neighborhood infrastructure and public facilities is rated as a
high priority need for CDBG funds.
Table 56 – Priority Needs Summary
Narrative (Optional)
The City will incorporate the above goals along with specific needs identified from the
2022 Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, community workshops and consultations in
considering funding applications for each of its five Action Plans covered by the 2022-
2026 Consolidated Plan.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 179
SP-30 INFLUENCE OF MARKET CONDITIONS
Affordable
Housing Type
Market Characteristics that will influence
the use of funds available for housing type
Tenant Based
Rental Assistance
(TBRA)
The City of Temecula does not receive HOME funds. Any
TBRA funds will be provided through the Housing Authority
of the County of Riverside (HACR).
TBRA for Non-
Homeless Special
Needs
The City of Temecula does not receive HOME funds. Any
TBRA funds will be provided through the Housing Authority
of the County of Riverside (HACR).
New Unit
Production
Based on land and development costs, it is more cost
effective to subsidize the development of affordable
multifamily rental units than to subsidize home purchase
loans or the construction of single-family residences. In
consideration of the lack of funding to completely address
the need for affordable housing, the creation of new
affordable housing during the Consolidated Plan will focus
on rental housing units where other sources of funds may be
leveraged to bring the per-unit development cost to the
CDBG program well below $100,000 per unit. The cost of
land, labor and materials affects the total development costs
and the number of units that the City can support in any
given year.
Rehabilitation The City will be working with Habitat for Humanity in
assisting low- and moderate-income homeowners with the
minor rehabilitation of their housing units and with owners
of multi-family properties seeking assistance for the
rehabilitation of affordable housing units.
Acquisition,
including
preservation
The City will be working with developers that may propose
the acquisition and preservation of existing housing units
with sources other than CDBG.
Table 57– Influence of Market Conditions
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 180
SP-35 ANTICIPATED RESOURCES
Introduction
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026,
the City of Temecula anticipates investing an estimated $2,779,910 of CDBG funds to
support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to
federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas for
each respective program.
Program Uses of Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan $
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation:
$
Program
Income:
$
Prior Year
Resources:
$
Total:
$
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
555,982 21,604 577,586 2,223,928
Based on
2021 FY
allocation
from HUD.
Table 58- Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private,
state and local funds), including a description of how matching
requirements will be satisfied.
Depending on the financing structure of a given activity, it may be advantageous for
the City to use CDBG funds to leverage appropriate state, local and private resources,
including but not limited to those listed below.
Federal Resources
• Continuum of Care (CoC) Program
• HUD Veterans Affairs supportive Housing (HUD-VASH)
• Supportive Housing for the Elderly (Section 202)
• Supportive Housing for Persons with Disabilities (Section 811)
• Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)
• Youthbuild
• Federal Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 181
State Resources
• State Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Program
• Building Equity and Growth in Neighborhoods Program (BEGIN)
• CalHome Program
• State Housing and Community Development Permanent Local Housing
Allocation
• Multifamily Housing Program (MHP)
• Housing Related Parks Grant
• CalHFA Single and Multi-Family Program
• Mental Health Service Act (MHSA) Funding
Local Resources
• Riverside County CoC
• Housing Authority of Riverside County (HARCO)
• Southern California Home Financing Authority (SCHFA)
• City of Temecula General Fund
• City of Temecula Capital Improvement Program
Private Resources
• Federal Home Loan Bank, Affordable Housing Program
• Community Reinvestment Act Programs
• United Way Funding
• Private Contributions
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the
jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan
would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. No publicly
owned land or property is available for this use.
Discussion
Assuming continued level funding of the CDBG program, the City expects to spend
approximately $577,586 of CDBG funds on housing, community development, public
facilities, infrastructure, and neighborhood services activities that promote a suitable
living environment between July 2022 and June 2026. It is anticipated approximately
$382,992 of this will be spent on public facilities, infrastruc ture, and housing rehab
projects and that $83,397 will be spent on neighborhood services. Anticipated projects
include:
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 182
• Before and after school programming,
• Homeless services,
• Housing rehab, and
• ADA modifications.
Assuming the continued funding level of the CDBG program, the City may allocate
CDBG funds for economic opportunity activities to support the development and
expansion of local small businesses during this next Consolidated Planning cycle
through its Office of Economic Development with its microe nterprise assistance
program.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 183
SP-40 INSTITUTIONAL DELIVERY STRUCTURE
Table 59 provides an overview of the institutional structure through which the City will
carry out its Consolidated Plan including the private, nonprofit, and public sectors.
Responsible
Entity
Responsible
Entity Type
Role Geographic Area
Served
City of Temecula
Community
Development
Department
Government Economic
Development
Homelessness
Non-homeless
special needs
Ownership
Planning
Rental
neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
public services
Jurisdiction
City of Temecula
Public Works
Department
Government neighborhood
improvements
public facilities
Jurisdiction
City of Temecula
Community
Services
Department
Government Non-homeless
special needs
neighborhood
improvements
Jurisdiction
City of Temecula
Office of Economic
Development
Government Economic
Development
Jurisdiction
Riverside County
Continuum of Care
Continuum of
care
Homelessness Other
Fair Housing
Council of
Riverside County,
Inc.,
Non-profit
organizations
Ownership
Public Housing
Rental
Region
Habitat for
Humanity Inland
Valley
Non-profit
organizations
Ownership/
Rehab
Region
Table 59- Institutional Delivery Structure
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 184
Assess of Strengths and Gaps in the Institutional Delivery System
The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high-functioning and collaborative—
particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector
comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full
range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of
HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development
activities that are implemented by the City. No institutional gaps were identified
during the consolidated planning process. The gaps continue to be more in the lack
of financial resources available to the City and its partners to meet identified needs.
Availability of services targeted to homeless persons and persons with HIV
and mainstream services
Homelessness Prevention
Services
Available in the
Community
Targeted to
Homeless
Targeted to
People with HIV
Homelessness Prevention Services
Counseling/Advocacy X
Legal Assistance X
Mortgage Assistance X
Rental Assistance X
Utilities Assistance X
Street Outreach Services
Law Enforcement X X
Mobile Clinics X X
Other Street Outreach
Services X X
Supportive Services
Alcohol & Drug Abuse X X
Child Care X
Education X
Employment and
Employment Training X
Healthcare X X
HIV/AIDS X
Life Skills X X
Mental Health
Counseling X
Transportation X X
Table 60- Homeless Prevention Services Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 185
Describe how the service delivery system including, but not limited to, the
services listed above meet the needs of homeless persons (particularly
chronically homeless individuals and families, families with children,
veterans and their families, and unaccompanied youth)
The City of Temecula’s public service programs will focus on the provision of services
to address the needs of homeless persons, particularly chronically homeless
individuals, families with children, veterans and their families and unaccompanied
youth through the CDBG public service grants awarded to local nonprofit service
providers. Street outreach, homelessness prevention, and supportive services for
special needs populations are high priority needs within this Strategic Plan and will
be funded as part of the Annual Action Plan each year.
An obstacle to delivering services to homeless populations can be the homeless
individual’s willingness to seek assistance and housing. To address this barrier
through direct outreach and engagement with linkages to available resources in the
City and the region, the City has contracted with the Riverside County Sheriff’s
Department. It will provide two deputies specially trained to address the needs of the
homeless. The Homeless Outreach Team officers work to develop trust between the
Sheriff’s Department and the homeless individuals and provide referrals to the
Riverside County Department of Social Services and local nonprofit service providers.
Describe the strengths and gaps of the service delivery system for special
needs population and persons experiencing homelessness, including, but
not limited to, the services listed above.
Temecula has a long track record of successful partnerships among public and private
sector entities. The delivery system for the HUD grant program is no exception.
Communication and cooperation is strong between the City of Temecula Community
Development Department and the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance
and the partner agencies and organizations that administer activities. City staff
continues to work closely with the other organizations to improve regulatory
compliance, monitoring, cooperation and partnerships among agencies and
technical capacity of organizations involved in project delivery.
The single most significant gap in the service delivery system remains the lack of
available funding to support local programs in Temecula for special needs populations
and persons experiencing homelessness. In Temecula, this funding is limited to 15
percent of the annual allocation of CDBG funds. The City is not a direct recipient of
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) funds; therefore, most of the HUD funding to
address homelessness is available through the Riverside County Department of Social
Services and the Continuum of Care. State funding has been reduced with several
years of fiscal challenges for the State of California and City funds for this purpose are
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 186
limited. Prior to the coronavirus pandemic HUD grants had declined over the last
twelve years. CARES Act funding has been enabled the City to respond where needs
were most acute. However, it has been difficult to accommodate increasing levels of
need in the community and increases in the cost of providing services to homeless
and special needs populations.
Provide a summary of the strategy for overcoming gaps in the institutional
structure and service delivery system for carrying out a strategy to address
priority needs.
To address the lack of resources necessary to support local programs in Temecula for
special needs populations and persons experiencing homelessness, the City
continues to work with its nonprofit service providers to explore alternate funding
sources and encourages the identification of alternate revenue streams. One source
is the HUD funding through the Continuum of Care.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 187
SP-45 GOALS SUMMARY
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Affordable
Housing
Development
2022-
2026
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Promote the
development
of affordable
housing
CDBG:
$0
Rental units
constructed
80 housing
units
Description: Support development of affordable housing by leveraging CDBG
to optimize other public and private sources of financing.
2. Housing
Preservation
2022-
2026
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Preserve
exiting
housing stock
CDBG:
$250,000
Homeowner
housing
rehabbed 30
households Description: Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock
occupied by low- and moderate-income households, renters, and owners.
3. Services for
low- and
moderate-
income
residents
2022-
2026
Public
Services
Citywide Provide public
services for
low- and
moderate-
income,
special needs,
seniors, and
veteran
residents
CDBG:
$172,710
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit 2,000
people
assisted Description: Provide lower-income persons with appropriate health, fitness,
recreational, educational and other services, including, but not limited to,
childcare, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the
well-being of low- and moderate-income families.
4. Services for
residents with
special needs,
including
seniors and
veterans.
2022-
2026
Public
Services
Citywide Provide public
services for
low- and
moderate-
income,
special needs,
seniors, and
veteran
residents
CDBG:
$145,420
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit: 375
people
assisted Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not
limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities,
domestic violence, substance abuse; HIV/AIDS; seniors, and veterans with
appropriate supportive services, including, but not limited to, those related to
health, fitness, recreational and educational services.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 188
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
5. Services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
2022-
2026
Homeless Citywide Provide public
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
CDBG:
$98,855
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit: 325
people
assisted
Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate
homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the
homeless and those at-risk of homelessness, including homelessness
prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing.
6. Public
facilities an
infrastructure
improvement
2022-
2026
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Improve
neighborhood
s, public
facilities, and
infrastructure
CDBG:
$1,664,96
0
Public facility
or
infrastructur
e activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit:
20,000
people
assisted
Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and
moderate-income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be
low- and moderate-income such as the elderly and disabled adults. The City
anticipated averaging approximately one accessibility activity a year.
7.
Administration
2022-
2026
N/A Citywide N/A CDBG:
$555,980
N/A
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG
programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD
requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the
Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully
allocated to goals
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 189
Table 61 – Goals Summary
Estimate the number of extremely low-income, low-income, and
moderate-income families to whom the jurisdiction will provide affordable
housing as defined by HOME 91.315(b)(2)
The City does not receive an allocation of HOME funds.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 190
SP-50 PUBLIC HOUSING ACCESSIBILITY AND
INVOLVEMENT
Need to Increase the Number of Accessible Units (if Required by a Section
504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement)
Not applicable. The Housing Authority of Riverside County (HACR) not have a Section
504 Voluntary Compliance Agreement.
Activities to Increase Resident Involvement
The Housing Authority maintains active resident councils at all public housing
developments and includes resident members on its Board of Directors. The Housing
Authority constantly seeks feedback from residents on improvements and planning
documents to ensure activities are meeting the needs of residents.
The Housing Authority maintains a home ownership program for current public
housing tenants. The program with its Family Self-Sufficiency Program to help
households save money for a down payment through an escrow account.
Is the public housing agency designated as troubled under 24 CFR part
902?
No.
Plan to remove the ‘troubled’ designation
Not applicable. HARC is designated as a high performing PHA.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 191
SP-55 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Barriers to Affordable Housing
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that
constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can
include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements,
environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable
housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that
barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of
Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and
market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are
• housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable
housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and
• housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the
supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable
housing resulting in renter households – and to a disproportionate extent Black,
Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing
conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and
plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distances from employment
centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates
and high exposure to poverty.
As Temecula’s population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs
of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English
proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population
and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of
California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and
preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change
impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are
mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former
Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 192
Strategy to Remove or Ameliorate the Barriers to Affordable Housing
To address these barriers the City will work to take the following steps.
• Investing CDBG into preservation of affordable housing and continuing to
leverage CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources,
• Marketing CDBG-funded programs in high poverty areas in a way that is
accessible to low-income residents,
• Promoting or targeting CDBG funded non-housing activities to high poverty
areas,
• Promoting fair housing education for tenants and homebuyers, and landlord
and realtors,
• Maintaining fair housing resource on the City website and maintaining housing
and a community development resources list
Additionally, in 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance,
which addresses the need for affordable housing in three ways. First it created the
conditions for the development of new affordable housing units in a range of sizes
including micro units and efficiencies that may be beneficial to developmentally
disabled adults. The AHO also removed barriers to affordable housing development
by allowing multi-family uses at higher densities by right without a conditional use
permit. The AHO established this zone on at least 100 acres throughout the City to
promote inclusive living patterns with respect to the location of affordable housing
outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty.
The City will continue to work with developers in accessing other funds to address the
affordable housing needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 193
SP-60 HOMELESSNESS STRATEGY
Introduction
Preventing and ending homelessness is a HUD priority addressed regionally through
coordination of strategies carried out locally by government agencies, community-
based organizations, and faith-based groups. Consistent with this approach, the City
of Temecula supports the efforts of Riverside County Continuum of Care (CoC) and its
member organizations. The City participates in the Southwest Riverside County
Homeless Alliance which it helped to create. Through its HOT program, the County
Sheriff’s Department works with homeless individuals and refers them to the
appropriate service providers.
Reaching out to homeless persons (especially unsheltered persons) and
assessing their individual needs
The City supports local nonprofit agencies that provide outreach, and housing
counseling to low- and moderate-income residents to prevent homelessness. The City
is optimistic that this investment in outreach, assessment and connection to
appropriate resources will significantly reduce the number of homeless. Through its
HOT program, the County Sheriff’s Department works with homeless individuals and
refers them to the appropriate service providers.
Street outreach activities implemented by local service providers are a means to
identify and bring forward individuals that are generally the least likely to seek out
services. Street outreach plays a critical role throughout the County by homeless
residents and connecting those residents with housing and support services. The CoC
adopted the national best-practice coordinated intake and assessment model to
connect individuals and families experiencing homelessness more effectively or at-
risk of homelessness to appropriate services and housing interventions. Through
dynamic prioritization, collaborative coordination, intentional resource utilization,
equitable resource distribution, and regional service planning area prioritization, the
Coordinated Entry System (CES) includes multiple service providers, a virtual “front
door” and a “no wrong door” approach. Dialing 2-1-1 is a good first step for any
individual or family that is at-risk of homelessness or that has become homeless. 2-1-1
representatives are skilled at connecting residents to the nearest service provider that
serves as an “access point” for the CES.
Addressing the emergency and transitional housing needs of homeless
persons
To end homelessness on a local level, the City through its involvement in Temecula
Homeless Coalition and its partnerships with local nonprofit and religious partners is
addressing the needs of the homeless. The City is participating with the CoC in
seeking additional permanent housing that is closely aligned with supportive services
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 194
that ensure that newly created housing stability can be maintained. However,
because the demand for affordable housing far outpaces the region’s supply, the CoC
continues to rely on its existing emergency and transitional housing system to
address the immediate needs of Riverside County’s homeless population. The City
continues to allow emergency shelters and transitional housing in areas that the
Zoning Code allows by right.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and
families, families with children, veterans and their families, and
unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and
independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for
homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and
preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from
becoming homeless again.
This Strategic Plan provides for the use of CDBG funds to support activities
implemented by local nonprofit organizations that provide services to help prevent
and eliminate homelessness, including but not limited to, families at risk of
homelessness, victims of domestic violence, special needs populations and
emancipated foster youth.
Help low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless,
especially extremely low-income individuals and families who are likely to
become homeless after being discharged from a publicly funded
institution or system of care, or who are receiving assistance from public
and private agencies that address housing, health, social services,
employment, education or youth needs.
An individual or family is considered at-risk of becoming homeless if it experiences
extreme difficulty maintaining housing and has no reasonable alternatives for
obtaining subsequent housing. Homelessness often results from a complex set of
circumstances that require people to choose between food, shelter, and other basic
needs. Examples of common circumstances that can cause homelessness include
eviction, loss of income, insufficient income, disability, increase in the cost of housing,
discharge from an institution, irreparable damage, or deterioration to housing, and
fleeing from family violence. The most effective and cost-efficient means to address
homelessness is to prevent episodes of homelessness from occurring in the first place.
This Strategic Plan provides for the use of CDBG funds to support activities
implemented by local nonprofit organizations that provide services to help prevent
homelessness. In Program Year 2022-2023 the City of Temecula’s Homeless
Prevention and Diversion Program as well as Community Mission of Hope will connect
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 195
homeless individuals and households with housing and other services and financial
and food assistance to address and prevent homelessness.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 196
SP-65 LEAD BASED PAINT HAZARDS
Actions to address LBP hazards and increase access to housing without
LBP hazards.
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes
prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing-based approaches. This
strategy requires the City to implement programs that protect children living in older
housing from lead hazards.
Overall, the City has a relatively new housing stock. Therefore, lead-based paint
hazards are not an extensive issue in Temecula. According to ACS data, Temecula’s
housing stock (about 93 percent) was built after 1979, when the use of lead-based
paint was outlawed, meaning that the residents of these homes should not be at risk
of lead-based paint hazards. Only those units constructed prior to January 1, 1978, are
presumed to have the potential to contain lead-based paint. In these units, the best
way to have reasonable assurance that lead-based paint hazards are not present is to
have the painted surfaces tested.
To reduce lead-based paint hazards, the City takes the following actions:
• Include lead testing and abatement procedures, as required, in all residential
rehabilitation activities falling under Strategic Plan Goal No. 2 for units built
prior to January 1, 1978.
• Educate residents on the health hazards of lead-based paint through
brochures and encourage screening children for elevated blood-lead levels.
• Disseminate brochures about lead hazards through organizations such as the
Fair Housing Council of Riverside County and the City’s residential
rehabilitation activities.
How are the actions listed above related to the extent of lead poisoning
and hazards?
Over time through testing and abatement, monitoring of public health data, and
through public education, the public will have greater awareness of the hazards of
lead-based paint to children. This will prompt homeowners, landlords, and parents of
young children to proactively address unsafe housing conditions in pre-1978 units
where children may potentially be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.
How are the actions listed above integrated into housing policies and
procedures?
The City of Temecula require the dissemination of brochures provided by the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency to all applicants as part of the transmittal of the
program application. Any unit receiving assistance through the program that was
built prior to January 1, 1978, is tested for lead-based paint. If lead-based paint is
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 197
present, appropriate abatement procedures are implemented as part of the
rehabilitation contract consistent with the requirements of 24 CFR Part 35.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 198
SP-70 ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
Jurisdiction Goals, Programs and Policies for reducing the number of
Poverty-Level Families.
Poverty continues to be a significant challenge in Temecula and throughout Riverside
County. According to the 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates,
there are 8,697 Temecula residents living below the poverty level. Of these residents,
37 percent identify as Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander, 33 percent identify
as American Indian and Alaska Native, 15 percent identify as some other race, 12
percent identify as Black or African American, seven percent identify as Asian, seven
percent identify as White, seven percent identify as two or more races, and 11 percent
identify as Hispanic or Latino (of any race).
To meaningfully address this challenge, each of the goals included in the 2022-2026
Strategic Plan is aligned to support activities promoting the availability of affordable
housing and provide essential services that directly benefit low- and moderate-
income residents. In the implementation of the Strategic Plan, the City will prioritize
funding for activities that most effectively address these goals over the next five years.
This strategy will emphasize using CDBG funds to help individuals and families rise
out of poverty to long-term self-sufficiency.
The implementation of CDBG activities meeting the goals established in this Strategic
Plan will help to reduce the number of poverty-level families by supporting
• expansion of housing affordable to low- and moderate-income households;
• preservation of decent housing affordable to low- and moderate-income
households;
• a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent and eliminate
homelessness;
• public services for low- and moderate-income residents including the elderly,
veterans, those with special needs and those at risk of homelessness offered by
nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG funds;
• improved accessibility of public infrastructure and facilities, and
• economic opportunity for low- and moderate-income residents who own
microenterprise businesses (five or fewer employees) or are starting a new
microenterprise business.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also
contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal
programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide a pathway
out of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational
opportunities. In California, the primary programs that assist families in poverty are
CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together, these programs
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 199
provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy for food,
medical care, childcare, and cash payments to meet basic needs such as housing,
nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons suffering
from substance abuse, domestic violence, and mental illness.
How are the Jurisdiction poverty reducing goals, programs, and policies
coordinated with this affordable housing plan?
Temecula’s desirable location in southwestern Riverside County makes it a high-cost
housing area. Housing costs declined and became more affordable following the
mortgage-backed securities housing foreclosure crisis. Home values have returned to
pre-recession levels and are currently out of reach for some. National funding
limitations on Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers and long application wait lists for
both conventional public housing and publicly assisted affordable housing limit the
number of families in poverty that can benefit from these housing opportunities or
programs.
The goals of this Strategic Plan are aligned to benefit low- and moderate-income
residents to reduce the number of poverty-level families. For example, the goal to
develop new affordable rental housing opportunities available to families earning less
than 30, 50 and 80 percent of AMI will provide additional affordable housing options
for families transitioning from activities funded under the Homelessness Prevention
Services goal. The Affordable Housing Preservation goal will include activities targeted
to families who own their residence but lack the resources to address emergency
repairs or maintain the property in compliance with City codes and standards.
Addressing substandard or emergency housing conditions allows low- and moderate-
income families to maintain housing stability, while also guaranteeing that all
economic segments of the community live in decent housing. The low - and
moderate-income residents, seniors and veterans and special needs services goals will
fund activities targeted to families in poverty and other low- and moderate-income
households with specific service needs. The small business creation and expansion
goal will provide technical assistance to low- and moderate-income owners of
microenterprise businesses (five or fewer employees) or those low- and moderate-
income people seeking to start their own local microenterprise. Providing this range
of targeted services allows low- and moderate-income residents in Temecula with
opportunities to rise from poverty and become more self-sufficient.
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 200
SP-80 MONITORING
Describe the standards and procedures that the jurisdiction will use to
monitor activities carried out in furtherance of the plan and will use to
ensure long-term compliance with requirements of the programs involved,
including minority business outreach and the comprehensive planning
requirements
To ensure CDBG funds are used efficiently and in compliance with applicable
regulations, the City provides technical assistance to all subrecipients at the
beginning of each program year and monitors subrecipients throughout the program
year.
Technical Assistance
To enhance compliance with federal program regulations, the City provides an annual
Notice of Funding Availability workshop to review the Strategic Plan goals, program
requirements and available resources with potential applicants. After the Action Plan
is approved, a mandatory subrecipient workshop is held to review program
regulations in detail, to provide useful forms and resources for documenting
compliance and to review the City’s compliance procedures and requirements.
Additionally, individualized technical assistance is provided on an as-needed basis
throughout a program year.
Activity Monitoring
All activities are monitored, beginning with a detailed review upon receipt of an
application to determine eligibility, conformance with a National Objective and
conformance with a Plan goal. This review also examines the proposed use of funds,
eligibility of the service area, eligibility of the intended beneficiaries and likelihood of
compliance with other federal requirements such as the National Environmental
Policy Act, the System for Award Management (SAM) debarment list, prevailing wage,
Minority and Women Business Enterprise, Section 3 and federal acquisition and
relocation regulations, as applicable.
Subrecipients are required to submit an audit and other documentation to establish
their capacity, and any findings noted in the audit are reviewed with the applicant.
Eligible applications are then considered for funding. Once funded, desk monitoring
includes ongoing review of required quarterly performance reports. For CDBG public
service activities, an on-site monitoring is conducted once every two years, or more
frequently as needed to ensure compliance. These reviews include both a fiscal and
programmatic review of the subrecipient’s activities. The reviews determine if the
subrecipient is complying with the program regulations and City contract. Areas
routinely reviewed include overall administration, financial systems, appropriateness
TEMECULA 2022-2026 CONSOLIDATED PLAN 201
of program expenditures, program delivery, client eligibility determination and
documentation, reporting systems, and achievement toward achieving contractual
goals. Following the monitoring visit, a written report is provided delineating the
results of the review and any findings of non-compliance and the required corrective
action. Subrecipients normally have 30 days to provide the City with corrective actions
taken to address any noted findings. Individualized technical assistance is provided,
as noted above as soon as compliance concerns are identified.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 202
2022-2023 Action Plan
AP-15 EXPECTED RESOURCES
During the five-year period of the Consolidated Plan from July 1, 2022, to June 30, 2026,
the City of Temecula anticipates investing an estimated $2.8 million of CDBG funds to
support the goals of this Strategic Plan. The annual allocation of CDBG is subject to
federal appropriations and changes in demographic data used in HUD’s formulas for
each respective program.
If Congress does not complete the appropriations process for HUD’s FY2022
appropriation prior to the thirty-day public review process for the Draft Action Plan
and final public hearing in April and City funding is either increased or decreased from
what is presented in the Draft Action Plan, no additional public review will be
required. Instead, City staff will inquire of each agency with City Council -approved
public services activities and determine if the agency will be able to implement their
program with the budget change. Once the City has determined the number of
agencies willing to proceed with their program, City staff will proportionately increase
or decrease all agencies’ grant awards.
Should additional CDBG funding become available during the program year through
cost savings, increase in allocation, or dropped activities, the City will use CDBG funds
to expand the scope of its multi-phased Old Town Sidewalk Improvement program or
fund a priority need identified in its ADA Transition Plan. If additional funding
becomes available for public services for the same reasons during the program year,
the funds will be distributed proportionately among the approved CDBG-funded
public services agencies. No additional public review will be required to take this
action, because this would be considered a minor amendment to the Annual Action
Plan.
For the 2022-2023 Program Year, the City will receive an estimated $596,645 of CDBG
funds and the Consortia will receive an estimated $555,982. When combined with
available prior year resources the 2022-2023 Action Plan allocates $577,586 of CDBG
funds to program activities that will be implemented from July 1, 2022, to June 30,
2023.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 203
Program
Uses
of
Funds
Expected Amount Available Year 1 Expected
Amount
Available
Remainder
of Con
Plan
Narrative
Description Annual
Allocation:
Program
Income:
Prior Year
Resources:
Total:
CDBG
Acquisition
Admin and
Planning
Economic
Development
Housing
Public
Improvements
Public Services
$555,982 $0 $21,604 $577,586 $2,223,928
Based on
2021 FY
allocation
from HUD.
Table 62 -Anticipated Resources
Explain how federal funds will leverage those additional resources (private,
state and local funds), including a description of how matching
requirements will be satisfied.
Available public resources to serve low- and moderate-income households will need
to be distributed across the spectrum of needs and heavily leveraged when possible.
This means providing funds for housing rehabilitation, and the creation or
development of new housing serving the target groups. The City will actively pursue
additional State and federal funding sources to leverage CDBG Funds.
If appropriate, describe publicly owned land or property located within the
jurisdiction that may be used to address the needs identified in the plan.
Land or property necessary to address the needs identified in the Consolidated Plan
would need to be acquired using HUD grant funds or other resources. No publicly
owned land or property is available for this use.
Discussion
The City of Temecula shares overall responsibility for meeting the priority needs
identified in the Strategic Plan with many agencies and organizations. The City is
responsible for using CDBG entitlement funds to address the needs of low- and
moderate-income residents. Other City departments and organizations provide
services to low- and moderate-income residents by utilizing funding from federal,
state, local and private resources.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 204
AP-20 ANNUAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Goals Summary Information
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
1. Affordable
Housing
Development
2022-
2023
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Promote the
development
of affordable
housing
CDBG:
$0
Rental units
constructed
16 housing
units
Description: Support development of affordable housing by leveraging CDBG
to optimize other public and private sources of financing.
2. Housing
Preservation
2022-
2023
Affordable
Housing
Citywide Preserve
exiting
housing stock
CDBG:
$50,000
Homeowner
housing
rehabbed 5
households Description: Preservation of the quality of existing affordable housing stock
occupied by low- and moderate-income households, renters, and owners.
3. Services for
low- and
moderate-
income
residents
2022-
2023
Public
Services
Citywide Provide public
services for
low- and
moderate-
income,
special needs,
seniors, and
veteran
residents
CDBG:
$41,813
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit 403
people
assisted Description: Provide lower-income persons with appropriate health, fitness,
recreational, educational and other services, including, but not limited to,
childcare, before and after school care and healthcare services to support the
well-being of low- and moderate-income families.
4. Services for
residents with
special needs,
including
seniors and
veterans.
2022-
2023
Public
Services
Citywide Provide public
services for
low- and
moderate-
income,
special needs,
seniors, and
veteran
residents
CDBG:
$21,813
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit: 127
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 205
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Provide supportive services for residents with special needs, including, but not
limited, to those services addressing the needs of residents with disabilities,
domestic violence, substance abuse; HIV/AIDS; seniors, and veterans with
appropriate supportive services, including, but not limited to, those related to
health, fitness, recreational and educational services.
people
assisted
5. Services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
2022-
2023
Homeless Citywide Provide public
services for
the homeless
and those at
risk of
homelessness
CDBG:
$19,777
Public
service
activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit: 180
people
assisted
Support a continuum of services in Riverside County to prevent and eliminate
homelessness including, but not limited to, supportive services for the
homeless and those at-risk of homelessness, including homelessness
prevention programs, emergency shelter programs and transitional housing.
6. Public
facilities an
infrastructure
improvement
2022-
2023
Non-Housing
Community
Development
Citywide Improve
neighborhood
s, public
facilities, and
infrastructure
CDBG:
$332,992
Public facility
or
infrastructur
e activities
other than
low-
/moderate-
income
housing
benefit: 7,287
people
assisted
Improve City of Temecula public facilities and infrastructure to benefit low- and
moderate-income residents or those presumed under HUD regulations to be
low- and moderate-income such as the elderly and disabled adults. The City
anticipated averaging approximately one accessibility activity a year.
7.
Administration
2022-
2023
N/A Citywide N/A CDBG:
$111,196
N/A
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 206
Goal Name Time
Period Category Geographic
Area
Needs
Addressed Funding Goal Outcome
Indicator
Description: Provide for the timely and compliant administration of the CDBG
programs in accordance with HUD policy and federal regulations. HUD
requires the City to represent Administration funds as a “goal” within the
Strategic Plan so that the sources of funds (refer to Section SP-35) are fully
allocated to goals
Table 63 – Goals Summary
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 207
AP-35 PROJECTS
Introduction
To address the high priority needs identified in the Strategic Plan, the City of Temecula
will invest CDBG in projects that preserve affordable housing; provide fair housing
services; provide services to low- and moderate-income residents; provide services to
seniors, veterans and residents with special needs; prevent homelessness; improve
public facilities and infrastructure; and facilitate the creation or expansion of small
businesses. Together, these projects will address the housing, community and
economic development needs of low- and moderate-income residents.
2022-2023 Projects
1. Operation School Bell
2. Before & After School Program
3. Housing Resource - Case Management
Program
4. Comprehensive Fair Housing Program
5. Senior Assistance Program
6 Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for
Trauma Survivors
7 Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families Program
8 CASA Program
9 Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program
10 Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program
11 ADA Transition Plan Implementation
12 CDBG Administration
Table 64 – Project Information
Describe the reasons for allocation priorities and any obstacles to
addressing underserved needs
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-administrative
CDBG allocation for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that benefit
low- and moderate-income people. The primary obstacles to meeting the
underserved needs of low- and moderate-income people include lack of funding from
federal, state and other local sources. The City does not expect any projects directly
furthering the goals for affordable housing development, and small business
expansion and creation during program year 2022-2023.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 208
AP-38 PROJECT SUMMARY
1 Project Name Operation School Bell
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Service for low- and moderate-income residents
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low and moderate income, special
needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
Funding $7,271
Description Clothing & supplies for low-income students in TVUSD
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
70 people assisted
Planned Activities Gift cards to purchase shoes and clothes
2 Project Name Before & After School Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Service for low- and moderate-income residents
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low and moderate income, special
needs, seniors, and veteran residents.
Funding $7,271
Description Round trip school transportation; activities before and after
school
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
8 people assisted
Planned Activities Scholarships
3 Project Name Housing Resource - Case Management Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Needs Addressed Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of
homelessness
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 209
Funding $7,271
Description Provide case management for homeless to find housing; food
pantry for those in need
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
150 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel
4 Project Name Comprehensive Fair Housing Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for low- and moderate-income residents
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low- and moderate-income,
special needs, seniors, and veterans
Funding $20,000
Description Fair housing education, training, technical assistance;
landlord/ tenant mediation
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
320 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel, rent, equipment, supplies
5 Project Name Senior Assistance Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Housing preservation
Needs Addressed Preserve the existing housing stock
Funding $7,271
Description Provide direct costs of hospice care for senior citizens and
severely disabled
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
41 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel, rent, equipment, supplies
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 210
6 Project Name Crisis Intervention & Supportive Services for Trauma
Survivors
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for residents with special needs, including seniors
and veterans
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low and moderate income, special
needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding $7,271
Description Provide support and services to survivors of sexual assault
and their families
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
13 people assisted
Planned Activities Salaries and supplies
7 Project Name Temecula SAFE & Healthy Families Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for residents with special needs, including seniors
and veterans
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low and moderate income, special
needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding $7,271
Description Victim awareness; case management; support for victims
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
73 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel
8 Project Name CASA Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for low- and moderate-income residents
Needs Addressed Provide public services for low and moderate income, special
needs, seniors, and veteran residents
Funding $7,271
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 211
Description Case management and advocacy for foster children in
Temecula
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
5 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel and supplies
9 Project Name Homeless Prevention & Diversion Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness
Needs Addressed Provide public services for the homeless and those at risk of
homelessness
Funding $12,500
Description Connecting homeless individuals with services and financial
assistance
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimated
number and type
of families that
will benefit
30 people assisted
Planned Activities Short term subsistence payments
10 Project Name Critical Home Repair & Maintenance Program
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Housing Preservation
Needs Addressed Preserve the existing housing stock
Funding $50,000
Description Provide Temecula residents with critical repairs to low and
moderate single owner-occupied homes
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
5 households assisted
Planned Activities Personnel time, construction rehabilitation costs
Project Name ADA Transition Plan Implementation
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 212
11 Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported Public facilities and infrastructure improvements
Needs Addressed Improve neighborhoods, public facilities, and infrastructure
Funding $332,992
Description Remove architectural barriers for public right of ways in
roadways, public facilities.
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
7,287 people assisted
Planned Activities Personnel and construction costs
12 Project Name CDBG Program Administration
Target Area Citywide
Goals Supported
Needs Addressed
Funding $111,196
Description
Target Date 6/30/2022
Estimate the
number and type
of families that
will benefit
N/A
Planned Activities Personnel
Table 65 – Project Summary Information
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 213
AP-50 GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION
Description of the geographic areas of the entitlement (including areas of
low-income and minority concentration) where assistance will be directed
The 2022-2026 Consortia Consolidated Plan does not identify specific targeted
geographic areas. All CDBG funds will be directed toward activities benefitting low-
and moderate-income City residents.
Target Area Percentage of Funds
Citywide 100%
Table 66 - Geographic Distribution
Rationale for the priorities for allocating investments geographically
Not applicable.
Discussion
Based on the Strategic Plan, the City of Temecula is allocating 100 percent of its non-
administrative CDBG allocation for program year 2022-2023 to projects and activities
that benefit low- and moderate-income people.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 214
AP-55 AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Introduction
The 2022-2026 Strategic Plan provides the framework for investing CDBG funds in the
City. Promote the development of affordable housing and preserve the existing
housing stocks have been identified as high priority needs. No new affordable housing
will be created in program year 2022-2023. Approximately XX units of low- and
moderate-income owner-occupied housing will be preserved by Habitat for
Humanity with CDBG funds.
Based on evaluation of ACS and CHAS data, there is a high need for additional rental
housing units affordable for households earning less than 80 percent of AMI. Of the
households earning 0-80 percent of AMI, 10,715 are cost burdened households —
meaning households paying more than 30 percent of their income for housing.
Furthermore, 4,645 of those households are considered severely cost burdened—
meaning they pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing. Within the
severely cost burdened households, 2,965 are renters and most of those households
(2,150) earn less than 50 percent of AMI and are considered the most at risk of
becoming homeless.
The age and condition of Temecula’s housing stock is an important indicator of
potential rehabilitation needs. Over 90 percent of housing in Temecula has been
constructed since 1980. Commonly, housing over 30 years of age needs some form of
major rehabilitation, such as roof replacement, foundation work and plumbing
systems. Housing over 20 years of age will generally exhibit deficiencies in terms of
paint, weatherization, heating / air-conditioning systems, hot water heaters and finish
plumbing fixtures.
According to CHAS data showing the year housing units were built categorized by
owner and renter tenure:
• Built 2000 or later 8,290 or 38 percent of the 21,600 owner-occupied housing
units
• Built 1980-1999 11,920 or 55 percent of the 21,600-owner occupied housing unit
• Built 2000 or later 4,900 or 41 percent of the 12,045 renter-occupied housing
units
• Built 1980-1999 6,050 or 50 percent of the 12,045 renter occupied housing units
• Preservation of the physical and functional integrity of existing housing units
occupied by low- and moderate-income households is a cost-effective way to
invest limited resources to retain existing housing units that are already
affordable to low- and moderate-income households in the community.
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported
Homeless 0
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 215
One Year Goals for the Number of Households to be Supported
Non-Homeless 0
Special-Needs 0
Total 0
Table 67 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Requirement
One Year Goals for the Number of Households Supported Through
Rental Assistance
The Production of New Units
Rehabilitation of Existing Units 5
Acquisition of Existing Units
Total 5
Table 68 - One Year Goals for Affordable Housing by Support Type
Discussion
The City funds residential rehabilitation with CDBG. This program does not provide
adequate to address the need in Temecula. State, other federal, and private resources
are necessary to have a greater impact.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 216
. AP-60 PUBLIC HOUSING
Introduction
There are 184 units of assisted housing in Temecula, 129 of wh ich are Housing
Choice Vouchers and 55 of which are Project Based Section 8. As of September
2021, 126 families including 83 of whom have disabilities and some of whom are
elderly.
There are no public housing developments in Temecula. All public housing programs
consist of housing choice and project-based vouchers administered by the Housing
Authority of the County of Riverside (HACR). All public housing programs consist of
housing choice and project-based vouchers administered by the Housing Authority
of the County of Riverside (HACR). HACR monitors all units to ensure they are in
adequate condition, meeting the Section 8 Housing Quality Standards (HQS).
Actions planned during the next year to address the needs to public
housing
There are no public housing developments or units planned for the City of Temecula
in the next year. HACR will continue to actively support and assist Temecula residents
with Housing Choice Vouchers.
Actions to encourage public housing residents to become more involved
in management and participate in homeownership.
HACR maintains active resident councils at all public housing developments and
includes resident members on its Board of Directors. HACR constantly seeks feedback
from residents on improvements and planning documents to ensure activities are
meeting the needs of residents.
HACR maintains a home ownership program for current public housing tenants
through its Homeownership Program. HACR also links its Homeownership Program
with its Family Self-Sufficiency Program to help households save money for a down
payment through an escrow account.
If the PHA is designated as troubled, describe the manner in which
financial assistance will be provided or other assistance.
Not applicable. HACR is designated as a High Performing PHA.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 217
AP-65 HOMELESS AND OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS
ACTIVITIES
Introduction
The City will invest CDBG funds during the 2022-2023 Program Year to address high
priority needs identified in the Consolidated Plan including provision of supportive
services for the homeless and those at risk of homelessness, low- and moderate
income, special needs, seniors residents, victims of violence, and persons with
disabilities.
Homelessness Services
The January 2020 Point-In-Time Homeless Count revealed on any given night in
Riverside County, approximately 2,884 people are homeless, up from 2,811 counted in
a prior effort undertaken in January 2019. On January 28, 2020, 729 people in shelters
and 2,155 people without shelter.
To address incidences of homelessness in the City and to prevent extremely low-
income Temecula families from becoming homeless, the City will place a high priority
on programs that work to prevent homelessness or rapidly connect homeless
individuals with housing and supportive services. To address this need, in Program
Year 2022-2023 the City will support a continuum of services utilizing leveraged funds
through the Riverside County CoC to prevent and eliminate homelessness including,
but not limited to homelessness prevention and housing counse ling programs,
outreach, food and subsistence payment programs. These programs will be run by
the City of Temecula and Community Mission of Hope.
Services for Residents with Special Needs
Analysis of available data and consultation with organizations providing services for
special needs populations revealed a high need for a range of additional services
including, but not limited to those concerned with developmentally disabled adults
and victims of violence. To address these needs, the City will allocate CDBG funds for
public service activities that will provide services for low-income seniors, victims of
violence and children. These projects will be carried out by the Assistance League of
Temecula Valley, the Boys & Girls Clubs of Southwest County, the Hospice of the Valley,
Riverside Area Rape Crisis Center, SAFE Family Justice Centers, and Voices for
Children.
Describe the jurisdictions one-year goals and actions for reducing and
ending homelessness including reaching out to homeless persons
(especially unsheltered persons) and assessing their individual needs.
The City’s one year goal to provide services to the homeless and those at risk of
homelessness is one step in ending homelessness. Activities under this goal include
outreach and assessment and will be provided through the City of Temecula’s
Homeless Prevention and Diversion program’s short term subsistence payments and
the Community Mission of Hope’s Housing Resource – Case management Program’s
housing counseling and food pantry.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 218
Addressing the emergency shelter and transitional housing needs of
homeless persons
The City of Temecula supports the efforts of the Riverside County Continuum of Care
(CoC) and its member organizations that address homelessness. As described earlier,
the City supports local nonprofit agencies who provide emergency rental assistance
and housing counseling to low- and moderate-income residents to prevent
homelessness. The City is not funding any of these activities with CDBG or other City
resources, so no goals have been established.
Helping homeless persons (especially chronically homeless individuals and
families, families with children, veterans and their families, and
unaccompanied youth) make the transition to permanent housing and
independent living, including shortening the period of time that
individuals and families experience homelessness, facilitating access for
homeless individuals and families to affordable housing units, and
preventing individuals and families who were recently homeless from
becoming homeless again.
To keep families who are at risk of homelessness due to domestic violence housed,
the City will provide CDBG funds to the SAFE Alternatives for Everyone Program to
provide victim awareness, case management, and support for victims.
Helping low-income individuals and families avoid becoming homeless,
especially extremely low-income individuals and families and those who
are: being discharged from publicly funded institutions and systems of
care (such as health care facilities, mental health facilities, foster care and
other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions); or,
receiving assistance from public or private agencies that address housing,
health, social services, employment, education, or youth needs
The City participates in the Riverside County CoC. The Riverside County CoC Ten-Year
Plan to End Homelessness included a goal to establish County wide protocols and
procedures to prevent people from being discharged from public and private
institutions of care into homelessness. The CoC is seeking to improve coordination
among publicly and privately funded institutions of care and local service agencies to
achieve this goal.
Discussion
With limited CDBG resources available, the City is investing in public service grants.
City of Temecula considers working to end and prevent homelessness a high priority
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 219
and will support CDBG funded activities that help prevent homelessness and that
provide a structured path to stable housing for individuals and families who become
homeless. The City is investing general funds through the Police Department budget
to provide HOT Program officers that will connect unsheltered homeless individuals
and families with emergency shelter, transitional housing, and permanent housing
opportunities, as well as other services to address special needs such as drug and
alcohol rehabilitation and mental health services. The City will continue to take a
leadership role in the Southwest Riverside County Homeless Alliance team meetings,
where homeless providers will collaborate in addressing the homeless needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 220
AP-75 BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
Introduction
A barrier to affordable housing is a public policy or nongovernmental condition that
constrains the development or rehabilitation of affordable housing. Barriers can
include land use controls, property taxes, state prevailing wage requirements,
environmental protection, cost of land and monetary resources. Barriers to affordable
housing are distinguished from impediments to fair housing choice in the sense that
barriers are lawful and impediments to fair housing choice are usually unlawful.
Based on information gathered during community meetings, the 2022 Assessment of
Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan Resident Survey, the 2021-2029 Housing Element and
market analysis, the primary barriers to affordable housing in Temecula are
• housing affordability,
• the lack of monetary resources necessary to develop and sustain affordable
housing,
• concentrations of racial and ethnic minorities,
• access to opportunities and exposure to adverse community factors, and
• housing issues.
These barriers are interconnected. Demand for affordable housing exceeds the
supply, insufficient resources are available to increase the supply of affordable
housing resulting in renter households – and to a disproportionate extent Black,
Native American, and Hispanic renter households - living in suboptimal housing
conditions. Those conditions are housing cost burden, incomplete kitchens and
plumbing, overcrowding, cost burden, inordinately great distances from employment
centers, low access to public and affordable transportation, low homeownership rates
and high exposure to poverty.
As Temecula’s population continues to change it should anticipate meeting the needs
of a small and increasing proportion of the population in Temecula has limited English
proficiency, an aging population and those posed by increasingly diverse population
and degree of segregation trends.
In the last five years, the elimination of local Redevelopment Agencies by the State of
California resulted in the loss of a crucial resource for the development and
preservation of affordable housing. This was the most significant public policy change
impacting affordable housing and residential investment. While there are
mechanisms whereby certain affordable housing assets tied to the former
Redevelopment Agencies may be utilized today, these resources are finite and scarce.
Actions it planned to remove or ameliorate the negative effects of public
policies that serve as barriers to affordable housing such as land use
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 221
controls, tax policies affecting land, zoning ordinances, building codes, fees
and charges, growth limitations, and policies affecting the return on
residential investment.
To address these barriers the City will work to take the following steps.
• Investing CDBG into preservation of affordable housing and continuing to
leverage CDBG funds to attract private and other available public resources,
• Marketing CDBG-funded programs in high poverty areas in a way that is
accessible to low-income residents,
• Promoting or targeting CDBG funded non-housing activities to high poverty
areas,
• Promoting fair housing education for tenants and homebuyers, and landlord
and realtors,
• Maintaining fair housing resource on the City website and maintaining housing
and a community development resources list
Additionally, in 2018, the City adopted an Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) ordinance,
which addresses the need for affordable housing in three ways. First it created the
conditions for the development of new affordable housing units in a range of sizes
including micro units and efficiencies that may be beneficial to developmentally
disabled adults. The AHO also removed barriers to affordable housing development
by allowing multi-family uses at higher densities by right without a conditional use
permit. The AHO established this zone on at least 100 acres throughout the City to
promote inclusive living patterns with respect to the location of affordable housing
outside of areas with relatively higher exposure to poverty.
The City will continue to work with developers in accessing other funds to address the
affordable housing needs.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 222
AP-85 OTHER ACTIONS
Introduction
The City’s planned investment of CDBG funds through the 2022-2023 Action Plan will
address obstacles to fostering development of and maintaining existing affordable
housing; evaluating and reducing lead-based paint hazards; reducing the number of
families living in at or below the poverty line; developing institutional structure; and
enhanced coordination among collaborative agencies and organizations.
Additionally, this section will identify obstacles to meeting underserved populations
needs and propose action to overcome those obstacles.
Actions planned to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs
The primary obstacles to meeting the underserved needs of low- and moderate-
income people include lack of funding from federal, state, and other local sources, and
the high cost of housing. To address this obstacle, at least in part, the City is investing
CDBG funds in local nonprofit organizations to address the public service needs of
those who are homeless, at risk of homelessness, seniors, and victims of violence.
To address underserved needs, the City is allocating 100 percent of its non-
administrative CDBG funds in Program Year 2022-2023 to projects and activities that
benefit low- and moderate-income people or people presumed under HUD
regulations to be low- and moderate-income.
Actions planned to foster and maintain affordable housing
In the implementation of the 2022-2023 Annual Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG
funds to preserve and maintain affordable housing through the Habitat for Humanity
Critical Home Maintenance and Repair Program, which will provide minor exterior
home repairs for approximately five owner-occupied single-family or manufactured
housing units.
Actions planned to reduce lead-based paint hazards
The Residential Lead Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992 (Title X) emphasizes
prevention of childhood lead poisoning through housing-based approaches. Because
nearly all of the City’s housing stock was built after 1978, it is rare for the City to
encounter lead-based paint hazards as part of its housing rehabilitation
program. Should a hazard exist, the City will require lead-based paint testing and risk
assessments for each property assisted that was built prior to January 1, 1978, and safe
work practices or abatement into the scope of work as required to reduce lead-based
paint hazards in accordance with 24 CFR Part 35.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 223
Actions planned to reduce the number of poverty-level families
The implementation of CDBG meeting the goals established in the 2012-2026
Consolidated Plan - Strategic Plan and this Annual Action Plan will help to reduce the
number of poverty-level families by:
• Supporting activities that preserve the supply of decent housing that is
affordable to low- and moderate-income households;
• Supporting a continuum of housing and public service programs to prevent
and eliminate homelessness;
• Supporting housing preservation programs that assure low income
households have a safe, decent and appropriate place to live; and
• Supporting public services for low- and moderate-income residents including
seniors, victims of violence and those with special needs and those at-risk of
homelessness offered by nonprofit organizations receiving CDBG public
services grants.
In addition to these local efforts, mainstream state and federal resources also
contribute to reducing the number of individuals and families in poverty. Federal
programs such as the Earned Income Tax Credit and Head Start provide pathways out
of poverty for families who are ready to pursue employment and educational
opportunities. Additionally in California, the primary programs that assist families in
poverty are CalWORKS, CalFresh (formerly food stamps) and Medi-Cal. Together,
these programs provide individuals and families with employment assistance, subsidy
for food, medical care, childcare and cash payments to meet basic needs such as
housing, nutrition and transportation. Other services are available to assist persons
suffering from substance abuse, domestic violence and mental illness.
Actions planned to develop institutional structure
The institutional delivery system in Temecula is high-functioning and collaborative—
particularly the relationship between local government and the nonprofit sector
comprised of a network of capable non-profit organizations that are delivering a full
range of services to residents. Strong City departments anchor the administration of
HUD grant programs and the housing, community and economic development
activities that are implemented by the City support and enhance this existing
institutional structure. Actions planned to enhance coordination between public and
private housing and social service agencies
Discussion
In the implementation of the 2022-2023 Action Plan, the City will invest CDBG
resources to address obstacles to meeting underserved needs, foster and maintain
affordable housing, reduce lead-based paint hazards, reduce the number of poverty-
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 224
level families, develop institutional structure and enhance coordination between
public and private housing and social service agencies.
TEMECULA 2022-2023 ANNUAL ACTION PLAN 225
AP-90 PROGRAM SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
Introduction
In the implementation of programs and activities under the 2022-2023 Action Plan,
the City of Temecula will follow all HUD regulations concerning the use of program
income, forms of investment, overall low- and moderate-income benefit for the CDBG
program
Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
Reference 24 CFR 91.220(l)(1)
Projects planned with all CDBG funds expected to be available during the year are
identified in the Projects Table. The following identifies program income that is
available for use that is included in projects to be carried out.
1. The total amount of program income that will have been received before the
start of the next program year and that has not yet been reprogrammed 0
2. The amount of proceeds from section 108 loan guarantees that will be used
during the year to address the priority needs and specific objectives identified
in the grantee's strategic plan. 0
3. The amount of surplus funds from urban renewal settlements 0
4. The amount of any grant funds returned to the line of credit for which the
planned use has not been included in a prior statement or plan 0
5. The amount of income from float-funded activities 0
Total Program Income: 0
Other CDBG Requirements
1. The amount of urgent need activities 0
2. The estimated percentage of CDBG funds that will be used for activities that
benefit persons of low- and moderate-income. Overall Benefit - A consecutive
period of one, two or three years may be used to determine that a minimum
overall benefit of 70% of CDBG funds is used to benefit persons of low - and
moderate-income. Specify the years covered that include this Annual Action
Plan. 100.00%
2022 Analysis of
Impediments to
Fair Housing
i
Table of Contents
Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 2
Fair Housing Issues ......................................................................................................................... 2
Overview ..................................................................................................................................... 2
Segregation ................................................................................................................................. 3
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse Community Factors .................................... 3
Housing Issues ............................................................................................................................ 4
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns ...................................................................................... 4
Fair Housing Goals ..................................................................................................................... 4
Demographic Summary .................................................................................................................. 6
Segregation/Integration ................................................................................................................. 11
Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 11
Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty (R/ECAP) ............................................. 20
Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 20
Disparities in Access to Opportunity ............................................................................................ 20
Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 20
Educational Opportunities ........................................................................................................ 21
Employment Opportunities ....................................................................................................... 25
Transportation Opportunities .................................................................................................... 36
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities ....................................................................................... 44
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities ........................................................... 48
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity ...................................................................... 51
Disproportionate Housing Needs .................................................................................................. 52
Analysis..................................................................................................................................... 52
2
Executive Summary
The City of Temecula is located in the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical
Area (MSA), which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. According to the
2020 Census, Temecula is home to approximately 110,000 people. Temecula is located in a cluster
of cities in Temecula Valley in southwest Riverside County. The other cities include Murrieta,
Menifee, Wildomar, Canyon Lake, and Lake Elsinore. All have experienced tremendous growth
in the past few decades, yet they remain separated from the metropolitan areas to the north and
south.
As a HUD Entitlement Jurisdiction, the City is required to prepare and adopt a Consolidated Plan
(Con Plan) and an Analysis of Impediments to Fair Housing (AI) to assist the City in identifying
fair housing issues, contributing factors, and goals in order to affirmatively further fair housing.
To identify fair housing issues, HUD requires jurisdictions to gather and analyze data. The data
utilized in the analysis are from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS),
HUD’s AFFH Data and Mapping Tool, and the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The data are generally
from the most recent available years, with the exception of the ACS data, which are from the 2013-
2017 estimates in order to align with the data utilized in the Con Plan.
HUD also requires jurisdictions to compare the data for their jurisdiction to regional data. For the
purposes of this analysis, HUD defines Temecula’s region as the Riverside-San Bernardino-
Ontario MSA. Because of Temecula’s location in the corner of the region, one must be cautious
to draw too many conclusions in comparing Temecula to the region.
Below is a summary of the fair housing issues, significant contributing factors, and fair housing
goals, as well as an overview of the process used to identify the fair housing goals.
Analyzed data topics include:
• Demographic
• Housing
• Segregation/ Integration
• Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of Poverty
• Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Fair Housing Issues
Overview
According to the data analysis, Temecula has a relatively high level of residential integration. The
analysis did identify that all residents of Temecula, regardless of protected class status, have
relatively low access to low cost and/or public transportation as well as relatively low access to
environmentally healthy neighborhoods (see Table 12). Additionally, Native American, Black, and
Hispanic residents of Temecula face additional fair housing issues, as described below.
3
Inland Fair Housing and Mediation Board is the primary organization providing fair housing
assistance and support within the region. The table below summarizes the types of assistance
provided in Temecula over the prior year.
Housing Assistances by Type
Type Cases in Temecula
Affordable Housing Information 7
Arbitrary 1
Deposit 1
Eviction Assistance 9
Habitability 5
Harassment/ Illegal Entry 2
Lease/Rental Terms 15
Mold 1
Notices 17
Race 1
Rental Assistance 11
Repairs 8
Section 8 Information 3
Other 6
Segregation
• Compared to the region, Temecula has relatively few Hispanic and Foreign-Born residents
(see Tables 1 and 2).
• Tagalog speakers appear to be concentrated in the southern and central parts of Temecula
(see Map 4).
Access to Opportunities and Exposure to Adverse
Community Factors
• In comparison to other race/ethnic groups, Native American residents, particularly those
living below the poverty line, are the least likely to live near employment centers, have the
highest unemployment rate of any race/ethnic group, have the least access to public transit,
and experience the highest transportation costs (see Table 12 and Labor Force Participation
and Unemployment table).
4
• The unemployment rate of Black and Hispanic residents is approximately double the
unemployment rate of White, Non-Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander residents (see
Labor Force Participation and Unemployment table).
• Asian/Pacific Islander, Black, and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line are
more likely to be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than residents living above the
poverty line (see Table 12).
• Census tract 432.16 has a Low Poverty Index value of 37 and a Labor Market Index value
of 37, indicating that residents in this area have high exposure to poverty and low levels of
labor market participation and human capital.
Housing Issues
• Over half of renters in Temecula are cost-burdened, meaning they use more than 30% of
their income to pay for housing-related costs (see Housing Trends table).
• Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are more likely than other households
to experience at least one of the following four housing problems: lacks complete kitchen
facilities, lacks complete plumbing facilities, overcrowding, cost burden (see the graph
titled, “Disproportionate needs across households earning 1-100% AMI”).
• Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are less likely to own their home than
White, Non-Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander households (see Homeownership and
Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity table).
Possible Future Fair Housing Concerns
• A small but increasing proportion of the population has limited English proficiency. The
main languages spoken other than English are Spanish and Tagalog (see Tables 1 and 2,
and Language Spoken at Home table).
• The population is aging. The proportion of the population that is over age 65 is increasing
(see Table 2).
• According to the Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Index, while segregation in Temecula
remains low, it has been increasing since 1990 (see Table 3).
Fair Housing Goals
Many of the fair housing issues summarized above are largely driven by private market forces over
which the Community Development programs have limited control. However, Temecula is firmly
committed to promoting access to fair housing and affirmatively furthering fair housing through
all of their programs and activities.
To promote fair housing, the following goals have been established for Temecula.
5
Goal Program Marketing
Description Temecula shall ensure that all HUD-funded programs are marketed
in high poverty areas within their jurisdiction in manners that will
be accessible to residents to ensure that low-income residents and
high poverty neighborhoods have best access to all program
activities. Marketing shall be conducted in accordance with the
City’s Language Access Plan.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall maintain documentation
showing that it marketed programs in areas of high poverty and
conducted such marketing in a way that clearly communicated the
program to the residents in those areas.
Goal Target Non-Housing Activities in Areas of High Poverty
Description Temecula shall use CDBG funds to carry out non-housing activities
(such as public works, public services, and economic development)
in areas of high poverty. This may include carrying out activities
citywide, but promoting services in those areas or electing to target
activities in these areas.
Evaluation To evaluate this goal, Temecula shall report in the CAPER how its
activities promoted anti-poverty goals and objectives.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Tenants and Homebuyers
Description Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for tenants,
homebuyers and potential homebuyers to ensure that residents are
fully informed of their rights as it relates to housing.
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training
participants.
Goal Promote Fair Housing Education for Landlords and Realtors
Description Temecula shall fund and promote fair housing training for
landlords and realtors to ensure that they understand the fair
housing requirements and rights of tenants and homebuyers.
Evaluation Maintain records of number of trainings conducted and training
participants.
Goal Maintain Fair Housing Resources on Website
Description In collaboration with the fair housing provider for Temecula,
maintain a page on the City’s website that provides access to fair
housing resources and documents. Further, collaborate with the fair
housing provider to promote trainings and other fair housing related
events.
Evaluation Review and update webpage resources annually with support from
fair housing provider and maintain documentation of promoting all
6
trainings and events carried out by the fair housing provider in the
jurisdiction.
Goal Maintain Housing and Community Development Resources
List
Description Establish and maintain a list of all housing and community
development resources that is updated annually. This list may
include services such as grant or loan programs for reasonable
modifications and access to programs such as Meals on Wheels.
Evaluation Review and update list on an annual basis.
Demographic Summary
Describe demographic patterns in the jurisdiction and region and describe
trends over time (since 1990).
Table 1 – Demographics, shows demographic information for the population of Temecula and the
region. The region is defined as the Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario Metropolitan Statistical
Area, which comprises Riverside County and San Bernardino County. Table 2 – Demographic
Trends shows similar data over time, going back to 1990. As shown in Table 1, Temecula is a
majority White, non-Hispanic city in a region that is majority-minority. Over half of Temecula’s
population is White, non-Hispanic, while in the region, only one-third of the population identifies
as White, non-Hispanic. Temecula has a smaller proportion of Hispanic/Latino residents compared
to the region: approximately one-quarter of Temecula is Hispanic while one-half of the region is
Hispanic. Additionally, Temecula has a slightly lower proportion of Afric an American residents
and a slightly higher proportion of Asian and Pacific Islander residents than the region. Over the
last 30 years, both Temecula and the region have become less White. This shift has been primarily
driven by the rapid growth of the Hispanic population, as shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, the main country of origin for the foreign-born population in both Temecula
and the region is Mexico. Five percent of Temecula’s population and 12% of the region’s
population was born in Mexico. In both Temecula and the region, the second-most common
country of origin for the foreign-born population is the Philippines—Temecula has a slightly
higher proportion of Philippines-born residents than does the region. In both Temecula and the
region, the proportion of the population that is foreign-born has been increasing over the past 30
years, as shown in Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, the most common language spoken among those who speak English “less
than very well” in both Temecula and the region is Spanish.1 Nearly 4% of Temecula’s population
1 The ACS does not provide 5-year estimates for all languages spoken by the population that speaks English “less
than very well” after the 2011-2015 dataset. Instead, for later years, data is provided for those who speak Spanish,
Other Indo-European languages, Asian and Pacific Islander languages, and Other languages. There are 1-year
estimates through 2019 that provide more specificity regarding languages spoken, but these estimates are not
7
and 13% of the region’s population has limited English proficiency and uses Spanish as their
primary language at home. Nearly 3.5% of the population of Temecula has limited English
proficiency and speaks Tagalog. In both Temecula and the region, the proportion of the population
that speak English “less than very well” has been increasing over the past 30 years, as shown in
Table 2.
As shown in Table 1, Temecula has slightly lower rates of individuals living with disabilities than
does the region. The most significant disability type in both Temecula and the region is
ambulatory: approximately 3.5% of Temecula’s population and 6% of the region’s population has
an ambulatory difficulty.
As shown in Table 1, the age breakdown of the populations of Temecula and the region are roughly
similar. Each have approximately 61% of their population between the ages of 18 -65, around 27-
28% of their population under the age of 18, and 10-12% of their population over the age of 65.
According to ACS data, the median age in Temecula is 34.9 years and the median age in the region
is 34 years. Over the past 30 years, the populations in both Temecula and the region have been
getting older. Table 2 shows the percentage of the population that is under 18 has been declining
while the percentage that is over 65 has been increasing.
As shown in Table 1, in Temecula, the percentage of all family households that have children
under the age of 18 living with them is approximately 52%. This is higher than in the region, where
approximately 47% of family households have a child under 18 living with them. In both Temecula
and the region, the percentage of families that have children has been decreasing over the past 30
years, as shown in Table 2.
available for Temecula. For this reason, Table 1 uses the AFFH data provided by HUD, which is from the 2011-
2015 ACS, with the exception of data for Spanish speakers, which is taken from the 2013 -2017 ACS table S1601.
8
Race/Ethnicity (2017)#%#%
White, Non-Hispanic 59,324 53.58%1,493,828 33.37%
Black, Non-Hispanic 5,221 4.72%309,795 6.92%
Hispanic 30,533 27.58%2,239,029 50.02%
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 10,264 9.27%298,740 6.67%
Native American, Non-Hispanic 442 0.40%16,519 0.37%
Two or More Races, Non-Hispanic 4,705 4.25%109,362 2.44%
Other, Non-Hispanic 233 0.21%8,949 0.20%
National Origin (2017)
#1 country of origin Mexico 5,414 4.89%Mexico 554,782 12.39%
#2 country of origin Philippines 3,280 2.96%Philippines 62,880 1.40%
#3 country of origin Korea 554 0.50%El S alvador 32,115 0.72%
#4 country of origin Vietnam 552 0.50%China excl. Taiwan 26,784 0.60%
#5 country of origin India 426 0.38%Guatemala 23,668 0.53%
#6 country of origin Canada 378 0.34%Vietnam 21,373 0.48%
#7 country of origin China excl. Taiwan 375 0.34%Korea 17,364 0.39%
#8 country of origin Colombia 339 0.31%India 17,278 0.39%
#9 country of origin Afghanistan 305 0.28%Canada 17,106 0.38%
#10 country of origin Japan 314 0.28%Taiwan 9,935 0.22%
Limited English Proficiency (LEP) Language (2015)
#1 LEP Language Spanish (2017)4,264 3.85%Spanish (2017)509,233 11.38%
#2 LEP Language Tagalog 3,385 3.36%Chinese 23,565 0.58%
#3 LEP Language Other Indo-European Language 1,685 1.67%Tagalog 17,869 0.44%
#4 LEP Language Other Asian & Pacific Language 920 0.91%Other Asian & Pacific Language 16,816 0.41%
#5 LEP Language Vietnamese 660 0.66%Other Indo-European Language 16,222 0.40%
#6 LEP Language Chinese 650 0.65%Vietnam ese 13,764 0.34%
#7 LEP Language West Germanic Language 555 0.55%Korean 11,881 0.29%
#8 LEP Language Korean 470 0.47%Other & Unspecified Language 9,738 0.24%
#9 LEP Language Other & Unspecified Language 360 0.36%Slavic Language 2,041 0.05%
#10 LEP Language French 355 0.35%West Germanic Language 1,723 0.04%
Disability Type (2017)
Hearing difficulty 2,727 2.46%134,692 3.01%
Vision difficulty 1,314 1.19%98,573 2.20%
Cognitive difficulty 3,236 2.92%185,324 4.14%
Am bulatory difficulty 3,942 3.56%264,490 5.91%
Self-care difficulty 1,639 1.48%110,137 2.46%
Independent living difficulty 3,197 2.89%187,680 4.19%
Sex (2017)
Male 54,040 48.81%2,226,881 49.75%
Female 56,682 51.19%2,249,341 50.25%
Age (2017)
Under 18 31,138 28.12%1,187,444 26.53%
18-64 68,154 61.55%2,746,625 61.36%
65+11,430 10.32%542,153 12.11%
Family Type (2017)
Families with children 14,043 51.85%468,086 46.99%
Note 3: Data Sources: U.S. Census B ureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; U.S. Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American
Community Survey 5-Year Estimates, accessed through the HUD AF FH Tool, Table 1, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 2020.
Note 4: R efer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation).
Table 1 - Demograph ics
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region, except family type, which is out of total families.
Note 2: 10 most populous places of birth and languages at the jurisdiction level may not be the same as the 10 most populous at the R egion level,
and are thus labeled separately.
9
Describe housing patterns in the jurisdiction and region, including tenure,
cost burden, and the location of renters and owners.
The Housing Trends table, below, shows data on housing tenure and cost burden for both Temecula
and the region. These data are from the 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey
5-Year Estimates. In both Temecula and the region as a whole, the number of housing units is
increasing, and the majority of housing is owner-occupied. Over the five-year period between 2012
and 2017, however, the share of renter occupied housing increased in both Temecula and the
region. In Temecula, this was due to faster growth in rental housing relative to the growth of
owner-occupied housing. In the region, the number of renter-occupied units increased while the
number of owner-occupied housing units decreased over this period.
Over half of all renters in Temecula and in the region are cost-burdened, meaning they use more
than 30% of their monthly income to pay for housing-related costs. The proportion of homeowners
who are cost-burdened is lower: approximately one-third of homeowners in Temecula and the
region pay more than 30% of their income for housing. Over the five-year period between 2012-
2017, the number of cost-burdened homeowners decreased significantly, perhaps reflecting the
recovery from the Great Recession. For renters over this same period, the absolute number of
renters who are cost-burdened rose even as the percentage of all renters who are cost-burdened
decreased slightly.
Race/Ethnicity #%#%#%#%#%#%#%#%
White, Non-Hispanic 19,366 80.23%46,288 69.28%57,816 57.75%59,324 53.58%1,615,830 62.41%1,540,776 47.33%1,546,666 36.61%1,493,828 33.37%
Black, Non-Hispanic 305 1.26%2,777 4.16%4,802 4.80%5,221 4.72%168,731 6.52%263,322 8.09%336,944 7.98%309,795 6.92%
Hispanic 3,505 14.52%12,161 18.20%24,232 24.21%30,533 27.58%685,672 26.48%1,228,683 37.75%1,996,402 47.25%2,239,029 50.02%
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 579 2.40%4,298 6.43%11,855 11.84%10,264 9.27%93,331 3.60%164,035 5.04%298,585 7.07%298,740 6.67%
Native American, Non-Hispanic 297 1.23%951 1.42%1,179 1.18%442 0.40%18,007 0.70%36,061 1.11%36,077 0.85%16,519 0.37%
National Origin
Foreign-born 2,361 9.82%7,817 11.70%14,577 14.56%17,152 15.49%360,666 13.93%612,354 18.81%904,558 21.41%956,427 21.37%
LEP
Limited English Proficiency 1,542 6.42%3,891 5.82%6,989 6.98%7,997 7.70%252,012 9.73%462,538 14.21%660,791 15.64%624,427 15.00%
Sex
Male 12,164 50.62%33,162 49.63%49,085 49.03%54,040 48.81%1,294,274 50.00%1,618,466 49.73%2,101,083 49.73%2,226,881 49.75%
Female 11,868 49.38%33,653 50.37%51,026 50.97%56,682 51.19%1,294,518 50.00%1,636,316 50.27%2,123,768 50.27%2,249,341 50.25%
Age
Under 18 7,528 31.33%23,439 35.08%30,381 30.35%31,138 28.12%771,845 29.81%1,044,686 32.10%1,214,696 28.75%1,187,444 26.53%
18-64 14,770 61.46%38,692 57.91%61,451 61.38%68,154 61.55%1,539,215 59.46%1,869,817 57.45%2,570,221 60.84%2,746,625 61.36%
65+1,733 7.21%4,684 7.01%8,278 8.27%11,430 10.32%277,732 10.73%340,280 10.45%439,934 10.41%542,153 12.11%
Family Type
Families with children 3,723 56.68%7,030 62.39%14,674 56.63%14,043 51.85%350,701 53.60%266,840 54.97%500,062 50.99%468,086 46.99%
Note 1: All % represent a share of the total population within the jurisdiction or region for that year, except family type, which is out of total families.
Note 2: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates; HUD AFFH Tool, Table 2, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 2020.
Note 3: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation).
Table 2 - Demographic Trends
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
1990 2000 2010 Current (2017)1990 2000 2010 Current (2017)
10
Map 16 – Housing Tenure includes two maps showing the distribution of renter households in
Temecula and the region. The darker shaded areas have a higher proportion of renter households.
The maps show a high concentration of renter households in the western portion of the jurisdiction.
In the region, there are concentrations of renters in the southwest, as well as in Census tracts in the
central and northern part of the region.
Tenure #%#%#%#%
Occupied Housing Units 30,880 33,644 1,276,316 1,335,366
Owner-Occupied 20,750 67.20%21,600 64.20%834,740 65.40%832,117 62.31%
R enter-Occupied 10,130 32.80%12,044 35.80%441,576 34.60%503,249 37.69%
Cost Burdened Households
All Units 15,841 51.30%13,061 38.82%616,461 48.30%561,328 42.04%
Owner-Occupied Units 10,188 49.10%6,798 31.47%363,112 43.50%279,789 33.62%
R enter-Occupied Units 5,622 55.50%6,263 52.00%253,023 57.30%281,539 55.94%
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2008-2012 and 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Table - Ho using Trends
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
2012 2017 2012 2017
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 16 - Housing Tenure
Description: Housing Tenure by Renters with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households who are
Renters
< 22.09 %
22.09 % - 36.92 %
36.92 % - 53.45 %
53.45 % - 73.4 %
73.4 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households who are
Renters: Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date created: 11/29/2021
11
Segregation/Integration
Analysis
Describe and compare segregation levels in the jurisdiction and region.
Identify the racial/ethnic groups that experience the highest levels of
segregation. Explain how these segregation levels have changed over time
(since 1990).
Table 3 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends shows how segregated or integrated various
racial/ethnic groups are in Temecula and the region using a Dissimilarity Index, which is calculated
using data from the 2010 Decennial Census. The Dissimilarity Index measures the degree to which
two groups are evenly distributed across a geographic area and is commonly used for assessing
residential segregation between two groups. Dissimilarity index values between 0 and 39 generally
indicate high integration (low segregation), values between 40 and 54 generally indicate moderate
segregation, and values between 55 and 100 generally indicate a high level of segregation.
As Table 3 shows, Temecula has low levels of segregation between White and Black, White and
Hispanic, and White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents. Hispanic and White residents are the
most integrated according to this metric, while Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents are the
least integrated. In comparison, the region as a whole has more moderate levels of segregation
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 16 - Housing Tenure
Description: Housing Tenure by Renters with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
TRACT
Percent Households who are
Renters
< 22.09 %
22.09 % - 36.92 %
36.92 % - 53.45 %
53.45 % - 73.4 %
73.4 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households who are
Renters: Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, EPA, NPS
0 15 30mi
Date created: 11/29/2021
12
between these racial/ethnic groups, with Black and White residents experiencing the highest
degree of segregation. Over the last few decades, as Temecula and the region have become less
White and more Hispanic (as shown in Table 2), they have also become more segregated overall.
This is evident in Table 3, which shows increasing Dissimilarity Index values for all groups in
both Temecula and the region.
Identify areas with relatively high segregation and integration by
race/ethnicity, national origin, or LEP group, and indicate the
predominant groups living in each area. Discuss how patterns of
segregation have changed over time (since 1990).
Map 1 – Race/Ethnicity shows the distribution of various racial/ethnic groups in Temecula and the
region—each dot represents 75 people, and the various racial/ethnic groups are represented by
different colored dots. Map 2 – Race/Ethnicity Trends shows the same distribution at three
different points in the past: 1990, 2000, and 2010. In these maps there are no apparent
concentrations or separation of colored dots in Temecula, indicating that residents of different
racial/ethnic groups in the City experience high levels of residential integration and have for the
past few decades.
In the region, by comparison, Map 1 shows some areas of racial/ethnic concentration that align
with the dissimilarity indices showing higher levels of segregation in the region than in Temecula.
While the maps are somewhat hard to read at this scale, there are areas on Map 1 where orange
dots (representing White, Non-Hispanic residents) are clustered with few people of other
racial/ethnic groups present. Map 2 shows the changing demographics over time, with an
increasing number of Hispanic residents, represented by blue dots on the map, concentrated in
certain parts of the region.
Racial/Ethnic D issimilarity Index 1990 2000 2010 Current 1990 2000 2010 Current
Non-White/White 1.27 10.17 15.87 18.06 32.92 38.90 38.95 41.29
B lack/White 3.98 15.06 19.88 22.77 43.74 45.48 43.96 47.66
Hispanic/White 0.59 11.63 16.07 19.17 35.57 42.40 42.36 43.96
Asian or Pacific Islander/White 3.07 9.97 19.80 24.88 33.17 37.31 38.31 43.07
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census, accessed through the HUD AF F H Tool, Table 3, Version AFFHT0006, Released July 10, 2020.
Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www .hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation).
Table 3 - Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity Trends
13
HUD Affirmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and M ap ping Tool
Name: Map 1 - Race/Ethnicity
Description: Current race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date created : 11/29/2021
14
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a an d M ap ping Tool
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trend s
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 1990
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hispanic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Dat e created : 11/29/2021
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and M ap ping Tool
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trend s
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2000
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hispanic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Dat e created : 11/29/2021
15
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and M ap ping Tool
Name: Map 2 - Race/Ethnicity Trend s
Description: Past race/ethnicity dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hispanic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Nat ive American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Dat e created : 11/29/2021
16
Map 3 – National Origin shows the distribution of foreign-born residents in Temecula and the
region. Each dot represents 75 people, and the different colored dots represent different countries
of birth, for the 5 most populous groups of foreign-born residents. The even distribution of dots
on the Temecula map indicates that foreign-born residents in the city experience high levels of
residential integration. In the region, by comparison, there are concentrations of residents born in
Mexico in certain areas, as indicated by the dense concentrations of orange dots.
17
According to the 2015-2019 American Community Survey 5-year Estimates (ACS), shown in the
table below (“Language Spoken at Home”), 23.8% of Temecula residents over the age of 5 speak
a language other than English at home, including 7.5% that speak English less than “very well”.
Of those who speak English less than “very well”, the largest groups are those that speak Spanish
(3.9% of the population) and Asian/Pacific Islander languages (2.8% of the population). According
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 3 - National Origin
Description: Current national origin (5 most populous) dot density map for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date created: 11/29/2021
18
to Map 4 - LEP (below), Tagalog is the primary Asian/Pacific Islander language spoken by those
with Limited English Proficiency.
Map 4 - LEP shows the distribution of residents in Temecula and the region with Limited English
Proficiency. Each dot represents 50 people. The different colored dots represent languages spoken
by individuals who speak English “less than very well,” for the 5 most common languages spoken
by residents with Limited English Proficiency. Tagalog speakers appear to be concentrated in the
southern and central parts of Temecula, as indicated by the green dots on the map, and therefore
may be experiencing residential segregation. In the region, by comparison, Spanish speakers seem
to be concentrated in certain areas.
Table - Language Spoken at Home
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction) Number Percent
Population 5 years of age and over 105,677 100.0
English only 80,578 76.2
Language other than English 25,099 23.8
Speak English less than "very well" 7,933 7.5
Spanish 15,300 14.5
Speak English less than "very well" 4,120 3.9
Other Indo-European languages 2,213 2.1
Speak English less than "very well" 656 0.6
Asian and Pacific Islander languages 6,899 6.5
Speak English less than "very well" 2,967 2.8
Other Languages 687 0.7
Speak English less than “very well” 190 0.2
Source: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey 2015-2019 5-Year Estimates
19
Consider and describe the location of owner and renter occupied housing
in determining whether such housing is located in segregated or
integrated areas.
HUD Affi rmat ively Furthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 4 - LEP
Description: LEP persons (5 most commonly used languages) for Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
Limited English Proficiency
[Jurisdiction] (Top 5 most
populous)
1 Dot = 50 People
Spanish
Ta galog
Other Ind o-European
Language
Other Asian & Pacific
Language
Vietnamese
TRACT
R/ECAPAFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date created: 11/29/2021
20
The analysis above shows that Temecula residents of various race/ethnicity, national origin, and
LEP groups experience high levels of residential integration across the jurisdiction and there are
no apparent patterns of segregation.
Discuss whether there are any demographic trends, policies, or practices
that could lead to higher segregation in the jurisdiction in the future.
As shown in Table 2 – Demographic Trends, Temecula has become more diverse over the past
few decades and there is reason to believe this trend will continue. Over the same period,
segregation levels (as measured by the Dissimilarity Index in Table 3 – Racial/Ethnic Dissimilarity
Trends) have remained low. The city continues to promote policies that encourage and support a
diverse population within the city and is committed to supporting the work of the Fair Housing
Council of Riverside County.
Racially and Ethnically Concentrated Areas of
Poverty (R/ECAP)
Analysis
Identify any R/ECAPs or groupings of R/ECAP tracts within the jurisdiction.
HUD defines racially or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty (R/ECAPs) as Census tracts that
meet both of the following criteria:
• a non-White population of 50 percent or more, and
• a poverty rate that exceeds 40% or a poverty rate that is three or more times the average
tract poverty rate for the metropolitan area, whichever threshold is lower.
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Which protected classes disproportionately reside in R/ECAPs compared
to the jurisdiction and region?
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Describe how R/ECAPs have changed over time (since 1990).
HUD data and mapping does not identify any R/ECAPs within Temecula.
Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Analysis
21
Educational Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to proficient schools based on
race/ethnicity, national origin, and family status.
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a School Proficiency Index, which
measures the proximity various racial/ethnic groups have, based on where they live, to
neighborhoods with high-performing schools. School proficiency is measured using school-level
data on the performance of 4th grade students on state exams. The index is based on a range of 0
to 100 with higher values indicating better proximity to high-performing schools.
In Temecula, the school proficiency index is similar for all racial/ethnic groups, indicating that all
groups have similar proximity to proficient schools. This is true for the total population and those
living below the poverty line, with the exception of Native Americans below the poverty line, who
have a significantly higher index value than other groups (76.30), indicating they are more likely
to live in neighborhoods with high performing schools than other groups.
In the region, there are wide disparities in the school proficiency index across racial/ethnic groups
and for the population below the poverty line. Black and Hispanic residents below the poverty line
have the lowest index values (25.68 and 26.74, respectively), meaning they are least likely to live
in neighborhoods with high-performing schools. White and Asian/Pacific Islander residents above
the poverty line have the highest index values (46.63 and 51.51, respectively) meaning they are
most likely to live in neighborhoods with high-performing schools.
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Low Poverty
Index
School
Proficiency
Index
Labor Market
Index
Transit
Index
Low
Transportation
Cost Index
Jobs
Proximity Index
Environmental
Health Index
Total Population
White, Non-Hispanic 77.09 68.11 51.86 43.35 34.97 47.19 42.26
Black, Non-Hispanic 73.35 68.27 49.24 43.18 37.57 50.70 42.02
Hispanic 71.54 66.04 49.09 46.06 38.56 54.21 41.00
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 74.66 69.97 49.79 42.76 36.53 46.91 42.94
Native American, Non-Hispanic 76.34 69.63 50.94 43.92 33.70 42.56 44.83
Population below federal poverty line
White, Non-Hispanic 71.44 66.63 49.45 47.49 39.32 53.81 41.48
Black, Non-Hispanic 66.61 65.92 48.93 44.32 44.20 54.80 40.01
Hispanic 68.62 67.03 50.04 49.97 41.96 53.88 40.50
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 57.08 64.40 43.25 55.32 46.87 66.14 39.17
Native American, Non-Hispanic 77.90 76.30 49.22 35.88 30.42 27.59 47.35
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
Total Population
White, Non-Hispanic 50.83 46.43 33.94 48.57 42.13 45.92 48.02
Black, Non-Hispanic 41.38 35.44 26.46 53.65 45.13 45.67 38.89
Hispanic 36.39 33.26 24.37 55.76 46.31 46.90 37.84
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 58.83 51.51 42.31 55.92 42.65 53.56 35.12
Native American, Non-Hispanic 39.48 35.90 24.58 47.70 43.26 43.36 49.90
Population below federal poverty line
White, Non-Hispanic 37.75 37.30 25.07 48.70 45.70 43.28 51.53
Black, Non-Hispanic 26.43 25.68 16.85 53.16 48.28 41.83 42.21
Hispanic 24.29 26.74 16.85 57.51 49.70 45.50 39.29
Asian or Pacific Islander, Non-Hispanic 41.94 35.76 29.56 58.72 49.53 57.38 34.87
Native American, Non-Hispanic 29.25 30.43 19.72 50.03 46.34 44.62 44.78
Note 1: Data Sources: Decennial Census; ACS; Great Schools; Common Core of Data; SABINS; LAI; LEHD; NATA - all accessed through the HUD AFFH Tool, Table 12, Version AFFHT0006, Released
Note 2: Refer to the Data Documentation for details (www.hudexchange.info/resource/4848/affh-data-documentation).
Table 12 - Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity
22
Describe the relationship between the residency patterns of racial/ethnic,
national origin, and family status groups and their proximity to proficient
schools.
Map 7 – Demographics and School Proficiency is a series of three maps showing the School
Proficiency Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type.
The maps are shaded according to school proximity index values. The darker shaded areas are
those with higher index values, indicating the presence of higher performing schools in those areas.
There are clear differences in school performance based on geography, with areas along the
eastern/southeastern edge of the city having higher performing schools than the central and
northern areas. The maps show that Temecula residents of different racial/ethnic groups and
different countries of origin, represented by different colored dots, have similar access to areas
with high performing schools: there are no concentrations of differently colored dots in the areas
with low performing schools (lighter shading) or high performing schools (darker shading).
Similarly, while there are families with children living in areas with lower school proficiency index
values, there are also families with children living in areas with high performing schools. The size
of the circles on the map indicates the percentage of households in the area that are families with
children. There are similarly sized circles in areas with low and high school proficiency index
values.
23
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 7 - Demographics and School Proficiency
Description: School Proficiency Ind ex for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hispanic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
School Proficiency Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
24
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 7 - Demograp hics and Sc hool Proficienc y
Description: School Proficiency Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
School Proficiency Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
25
Describe how school-related policies, such as school enrollment policies,
affect a student’s ability to attend a proficient school. Which protected
class groups are least successful in accessing proficient schools?
The City of Temecula does not have jurisdiction over the public schools, which are governed by
independent public-school districts, such as the Temecula Valley Unified School District. The
Temecula Valley Unified School District has a policy that allows parents to transfer their children
among schools, subject to availability. In these cases, parents are responsible for providing
transportation to the new school.
Employment Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to jobs and labor markets by protected
class groups.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 7 - Demographics and School Proficiency
Description: School Proficiency Ind ex for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status, and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
School Proficiency Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
School Proficiency Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
26
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Jobs Proximity Index, which
measures the physical distance between where Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities
live and the location of jobs. A higher index value indicates better access to employment
opportunities. In Temecula, there is some disparity in access to employment centers by
race/ethnicity: Hispanic residents are most likely to live near employment centers (with an index
value of 54.21) and Native Americans are least likely to live near employment centers (with an
index value of 42.56). Overall, Native American residents living below the poverty line are the
least likely to live near employment centers (with an index value of 27.59) while Asian/Pacific
Islander residents living below the poverty line are the most likely to live near employment centers
(with an index value of 66.14).
Except for Native American residents living below the poverty line and individuals of
Asian/Pacific Islander descent, residents in Temecula generally have better access to employment
centers than residents in the region as a whole. In the region, Black residents living below the
poverty line have the least access to employment centers (with an index value of 41.83) and
Asian/Pacific Islander residents living below the poverty line have the greatest access (with an
index value of 57.38).
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Labor Market Index, which
measures the unemployment rate, labor-force participation rate, and percent of the population ages
25 and above with at least a bachelor’s degree, by neighborhood. A higher index value indicates
that residents live in a neighborhood with higher labor force participation and human capital. In
Temecula, the table shows that most groups have similar access to neighborhoods with high labor
force participation and human capital. Apart from Asian/Pacific Islander residents, who have the
lowest index value (43.25), the different racial/ethnic groups, including those living below the
poverty line, all have values that range between 48.93 and 51.86.
Compared to the region, Temecula’s residents generally have better access to neighborhoods with
high labor force participation and human capital. Asian/Pacific Islander residents in the region
have an index value similar to the value for Asian/Pacific Islanders in Temecula (42.31 in the
region, compared to 43.25 in Temecula). In the region, all other racial/ethnic groups, including
populations living below the poverty line, have much lower index values than in Temecula.
Furthermore, the populations living below the poverty line in the region have lower index values
than the overall regional population. Black and Hispanic residents living below the poverty line
have the lowest index value (16.85), indicating they have the least access of any group to
neighborhoods with high labor force participation and human capital.
How does a person’s place of residence affect their ability to obtain a job?
Map 8 – Demographics and Job Proximity is a series of three maps showing the Jobs Proximity
Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these
maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are closer to areas
of employment. The maps clearly show the western half of the jurisdiction has better proximity to
jobs centers, meaning residents that live in those areas are closer to employment opportunities.
27
Because Temecula is well integrated, there is no difference in proximity to job opportunities by
race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hisp anic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Jobs Proximity Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
28
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family st atus and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philipp ines
Other South East ern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Jobs Proximity Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
29
Map 9 – Demographics and Labor Market is a series of three maps showing the Labor Market
Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these
maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they have higher labor
force participation and human capital. The maps show the central and northern parts of the
jurisdiction have higher levels of labor force participation and human capital, relative to other parts
of the jurisdiction. Because Temecula is well integrated, there is no difference in access to areas
with high labor market index values based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 8 - Demographics and Job Proximity
Description: Jobs Proximity Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Jobs Proximity Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Jobs Proximity Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
30
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hisp anic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Labor Market Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Labor Market Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
31
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South East ern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Labor Market Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Labor Market Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
32
Which racial/ethnic, national origin, or family status groups are least
successful in accessing employment?
The table below titled, Labor Force Participation and Unemployment, shows 2013-2017 American
Community Survey data on labor force participation rates and unemployment rates for the overall
population and by race/ethnicity, disability status, and sex, in both Temecula and the region. The
graph below title, COVID-19 Pandemic Impact on Unemployment Rate, shows the monthly
unemployment rate for Temecula and the region in 2020 and 2021, demonstrating the impact of
the COVID-19 pandemic on employment.
According to the table, in Temecula, Hispanic residents have the highest labor force participation
rate (70.8%) and Black residents have the lowest (64.4%). There are much wider disparities in the
unemployment rate. Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents have the lowest unemployment
rates (5.43% and 6.2%, respectively). Black and Hispanic residents have significantly higher
unemployment rates (10.8% and 11%, respectively). Native Americans have the highest
unemployment rate in Temecula: 22.1%. In the region, by comparison, unemployment rates are
generally higher than in Temecula, with the exception of rates for Hispanic and Native American
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 9 - Demographics and Labor Market
Description: Labor Engagement Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Labor Market Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Labor Market Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
33
residents, which are slightly lower. The pattern of disparities in the region is similar to the city,
with Asian/Pacific Islander and White residents having the lowest unemployment rates, followed
by Black and Hispanic residents, and Native Americans having the highest rates of unemployment.
In both Temecula and the region, residents with a disability are far more likely to be unemployed
than the population as a whole. In Temecula, the unemployment rate for residents with a disability
is 13.7% (compared to 7.6% for the overall population). In the region, it is even higher: the
unemployment rate for residents with a disability is 17.1% (compared to 9.9% for the overall
population).
Finally, in both Temecula and the region, women are more likely to be unemployed than men. In
Temecula, the unemployment rate for women is 7.4% compared to 6.2% for men. In the region,
the unemployment rate for women is 9.5% compared to 8.8% for men.
As shown in the graph below, during the economic shutdown necessitated by the COVID-19
pandemic, unemployment in both Temecula and the region increased dramatically. While the
unemployment rate in Temecula reached higher levels in March-May 2020 than the unemployment
rate in the region (peaking at approximately 17% in Temecula compared to 15% in the region),
since June 2020, employment in Temecula has recovered at a faster rate than in the region, leading
to lower unemployment levels in Temecula during the second half of 2020 and throughout 2021.
Labor Force
Participation Rate Unemployment Rate Labor Force
Participation Rate Unemployment Rate
Popul ati on 16 years and over 66.2 0%7.60 %60 .30%9.90%
Race/Ethnicity
White, Non-Hispanic 65.3 0%6.20 %55 .50%8.30%
B lack 64.4 0%1 0.80 %58 .50%14.10%
Hispanic 70.8 0%1 1.00 %64 .40%10.60%
Asian or Pacific Islander 64.6 7%5.43 %60 .70%7.40%
Native American 65.5 0%2 2.10 %56 .30%17.80%
Disability Status
With any disability 49.6 0%1 3.70 %38 .50%17.10%
Sex (population 20 to 64 years)
Male 87.6 0%6.20 %80 .20%8.80%
Female 69.5 0%7.40 %65 .80%9.50%
Table - Labor Fo rce Participation and Un emp loyment
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
34
It is very likely the COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated racial/ethnic and gender-based
unemployment disparities in both Temecula and the region. While data at a local level is not yet
available, national trends show wide disparities in job losses by race/ethnicity and sex. According
to the Congressional Research Service,2 across the U.S., women at every age group experienced
higher increases in unemployment during the pandemic than men. The same was true for Black
and Hispanic workers in comparison to White and Asian workers. The tables below show the
disparities in peak unemployment rates during the pandemic by age/sex, race, and ethnicity.
2 Falk, G., Romero, P., Nicchitta, I., & Nyhof, E. (2021, August 20). Unemployment Rates During the COVID-19
Pandemic. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service. Retrieved December 4, 2021 , from
https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/details?prodcode=R46554
35
36
Transportation Opportunities
37
Describe any disparities in access to transportation based on place of
residence, cost, or other transportation related factors.
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Transit Index, which measures
the likelihood that residents utilize public transportation. Higher index values indicate better access
to public transit in a neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different
races/ethnicities have comparable access to public transit. Index values range from a low of 42.76
for Asian/Pacific Islanders to a high of 46.06 for Hispanic residents. For the population below the
poverty line, access to public transit is generally better, with higher index values for all groups
except of Native Americans living below the poverty line, who have the lowest index value in the
jurisdiction: 35.88.
In the region, all racial/ethnic groups have better access to public transit compared to Temecula.
In the region, Native Americans have the least access, with an index value of 47.70, and
Asian/Pacific Islanders have the greatest access, with in index value of 55.92. Access to public
transit is generally even higher for the population living below the poverty line, with Asian/Pacific
Islanders living below the poverty having the highest index value (58.72).
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity also includes a Low Transportation Cost
Index, which measures the cost of transportation in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate
lower transportation costs. Transportation costs may be low in a neighborhood due to better access
to public transportation, or to the density of housing, services, and employment, or to other reasons.
As Table 12 shows, transportation costs are comparable for all racial/ethnic groups in Temecula.
Native Americans have the highest costs, with an index value of 33.70, and Hispanic residents
have the lowest costs, with an index value of 38.56. For residents living below the poverty line,
transportation costs are generally lower, with higher index values for all groups except Native
Americans, who have the lowest index value in the jurisdiction: 30.42.
In the region, index values are higher for all groups, indicating lower transportation costs overall
for residents in the region. There are no large disparities by race/ethnicity. The lowest index value
is 42.13 (for White, Non-Hispanic residents) and the highest index value is 46.31 (for Hispanic
residents). For the population below the poverty line, index values are higher for all racial/ethnic
groups. Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the highest index value (49.70) and
White, Non-Hispanic residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index value (45.70).
Map 10 – Demographics and Transit Trips is a series of three maps showing the Transit Index and
population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas
with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with better access to
public transit. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the central and northwestern part
of the jurisdiction have better access to public transit than other areas in Temecula. As described
previously, Temecula residents experience a relatively high level of residential integration across
races/ethnicities, national origins, and family types. Similarly, Map 10 shows that there is no
concentration of particular racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in
neighborhoods with greater or lesser access to public transit.
38
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native Americ an, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Transit Trips Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
39
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Transit Trips Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
40
Map 11 – Demographics and Low Transportation Cost is a series of three maps showing the Low
Transportation Cost Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family
type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means they
are areas with lower transportation costs. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the
central and northwestern part of the jurisdiction have lower transportation costs than residents in
other areas in Temecula. Additionally, these maps show that there is no concentration of particular
racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with higher or lower
transportation costs.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 10 - Demographics and Transit Trips
Description: Transit Trips Index for Jurisdiction and Region with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and
R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Transit Trips Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Transit Trips Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
41
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost
Description: Low Transportation Cost Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native Americ an, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Transport ation Cost Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Transport ation Cost Index:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
42
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost
Description: Low Transportation Cost with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other Sout h Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Transport ation Cost Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Transport ation Cost Index:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
43
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most
affected by the lack of a reliable, affordable transportation connection
between their place of residence and opportunities?
In general, there are no significant differences in access to public transit or transportation cost by
race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type, with the exception of Native Americans living below
the poverty line, who experience the least access to public transit and the highest transportation
costs of any group.
Describe how the jurisdiction’s and region’s policies, such as public
transportation routes or transportation systems designed for use personal
vehicles, affect the ability of protected class groups to access
transportation.
Public transportation is provided by the Riverside Transit Agency and is not under the authority
of the City. However, Temecula is served by several bus lines that provide service throughout the
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 11 - Demographics and Low Transportation Cost
Description: Low Transportation Cost Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Transport ation Cost Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Transport ation Cost Index:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
44
week and weekends. As it has done in the past, the City will continue to partner with developers
to privately fund transportation options as development occurs. The City recently partners with
RTA, the regional shopping mall, and the new community college campus to offer expanded
transportation options to these workplaces, economic, and education opportunities.
Low Poverty Exposure Opportunities
Describe any disparities in exposure to poverty by protected class groups.
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes a Low Poverty Index, which
measures the level of poverty in a neighborhood. Higher index values indicate less exposure to
poverty in a neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities
in general have similar levels of exposure to poverty. White, Non-Hispanic residents have the least
exposure to poverty, with an index value of 77.09. Hispanic residents have the most exposure to
poverty, with an index value of 71.54. However, there are significant disparities in exposure to
poverty by race/ethnicity for the population living below the poverty line. Asian/Pacific Islander
residents living below the poverty line have the lowest index values (57.08), followed by Black
and Hispanic residents (66.61 and 68.62, respectively), indicating these groups are more likely to
be exposed to poverty in their neighborhoods than residents living above the poverty line.
Compared to the region, Temecula residents are much less likely to be exposed to poverty. In the
region, Hispanic residents have the highest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 36.39.
Asia/Pacific Islander residents have the lowest exposure to poverty, with an index value of 58.83.
The population living below the poverty line in the region is even more likely to be exposed to
poverty in their neighborhoods, with index values significantly lower than the overall population.
Index values for the population below the poverty line range from 24.29 for Hispanic residents to
41.94 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents.
What role does a person’s place of residence play in their exposure to
poverty?
Map 12 – Demographics and Poverty is a series of three maps showing the Low Poverty Index and
population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and family type. On these maps, the areas
with darker shading have higher index values, which means they are areas with less exposure to
poverty. The maps show that residents in neighborhoods in the eastern half of Temecula have less
exposure to poverty than residents in other areas. As described previously, Temecula residents
experience a relatively high level of residential integration across races/ethnicities, national
origins, and family types. Similarly, Map 12 shows that there is no concentration of particular
racial/ethnic groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with more or less
exposure to poverty.
45
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map ping Tool
Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hispanic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native American, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Poverty Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Poverty Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
46
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other Sout h Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Poverty Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Poverty Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
47
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups are most
affected by these poverty indicators?
According to the above analysis, Asian/Pacific Islanders living below the poverty line have the
highest exposure to poverty in Temecula, followed by Black and Hispanic residents living below
the poverty line.
The table below, titled “Poverty by Race/Ethnicity and National Origin”, shows data from the
2013-2017 American Community Survey on poverty rates by race/ethnicity and national origin.
According to the table, Temecula has a relatively low poverty rate (6.81%) compared to the region
(16.82%), and this is true across race/ethnic and national origin groups (with the exception of
Native Americans). Within Temecula, however, there are disparities in who experiences poverty
by race/ethnicity and national origin. Native American residents have the highest poverty rate
(30.36%), followed by Black residents (12.34%), Asian/Pacific Islander residents (8.04%),
Hispanic residents (7.44%), and White, Non-Hispanic residents, who have the lowest poverty rate
(5.75%). Foreign-born residents of Temecula are also slightly more likely to live below the poverty
line, with a poverty rate of 7.7% compared to 6.64% for native-born residents.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 12 - Demographics and Poverty
Description: Low Poverty Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Low Poverty Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Low Poverty Index: Data not
Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
48
In the region, similar disparities occur, with Native American, Black, and Hispanic residents more
likely to live below the poverty line than White, Non-Hispanic residents. Asian/Pacific Islander
residents in the region, while having a higher poverty rate than their counterparts in Temecula,
have a relatively low poverty rate compared to other groups in the region. As in Temecula, foreign-
born residents are more likely to live below the poverty line than native-born residents.
Describe how the jurisdiction’s and region’s policies affect the ability of
protected class groups to access low poverty areas.
The City has adopted land use policies concentrating multi-family housing projects along major
arterials, shopping, employment centers, and recreational facilities. This allows lower income
persons easier access to opportunities; but at the same time, concentration of multi-family housing
may statistically increase residents’ exposure to poverty.
Environmentally Healthy Neighborhood Opportunities
Describe any disparities in access to environmentally healthy
neighborhoods by protected class groups.
Table 12 – Opportunity Indicators, by Race/Ethnicity includes an Environmental Health Index,
which captures the potential exposure to harmful toxins in a neighborhood. Higher index values
indicate less exposure to harmful toxins, and therefore better environmental quality, in a
neighborhood. As Table 12 shows, Temecula residents of different races/ethnicities in general
have similar levels of access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods. Index values in Table 12
range from 41.00 for Hispanic residents to 44.83 for Native American residents. Populations living
below the poverty line have similar levels of access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods.
Index values for those below the poverty line range from 39.17 for Asian/Pacific Islander residents
to 47.35 for Native American Residents.
Total
Population
Population Living Below
Poverty Rate (#)
Population Living Below
Poverty Rate (%)
Total
Population
Population Living Below
Poverty Rate (#)
Population Living Below
Poverty Rate (%)
Total Population 110,280 7,508 6.81%4,382,493 737,025 16.82%
Race/Ethnicity
White, Non-Hispanic 59,147 3,402 5.75%1,465,613 159,930 10.91%
Black 5,557 686 12.34%313,338 73,271 23.38%
Hispanic 30,421 2,264 7.44%2,198,958 452,129 20.56%
Asian or Pacific Islander 10,642 856 8.04%301,846 35,449 11.74%
Native American 685 208 30.36%35,878 8,519 23.74%
National Origin
Foreign B orn 17,110 1,318 7.70%943,917 174,128 18.45%
Native 93,170 6,190 6.64%3,438,576 562,897 16.37%
Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)
Table - Poverty by Race/Eth nicity and National Origin
Note 1: Data Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
49
In the region, there are more disparities in access to environmentally health neighborhood across
races/ethnicities. The lowest index value in the region is 35.12 for Asian/Pacific Islanders and the
highest is 49.90 for Native Americans. For regional residents living below the poverty line, there
are similar disparities: Asian/Pacific Islanders have the lowest index value (34.87) and White,
Non-Hispanic residents have the highest index value—of any group in the region (51.53)
Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental Health is a series of three maps showing the
Environmental Health Index and population distribution by race/ethnicity, national origin, and
family type. On these maps, the areas with darker shading have higher index values, which means
they are areas with less exposure to harmful toxins and therefore higher environmental quality.
The maps show that most Temecula neighborhoods have a similar, relatively low (compared to
the national average) level of environmental quality. Some neighborhoods along the eastern edge
of the city have slightly higher index values, meaning that residents in those neighborhoods have
access to a somewhat healthier environment than residents in other areas. As described previously,
Temecula is well integrated and Map 13 shows that there is no concentration of racial/ethnic
groups, national origin groups, or family types in neighborhoods with better or worse
environmental quality.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Ind ex with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native Americ an, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Environmental Health Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Environmental Health Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
50
HUD Affirmat ively Fu rt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Index with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other Sout h Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Environmental Health Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Environmental Health Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed : 11/29/2021
51
Which racial/ethnic, national origin or family status groups have the least
access to environmentally healthy neighborhoods?
The Environmental Health Index in Table 12 and Map 13 – Demographics and Environmental
Health show that there is no significant disparity in access to environmentally healthy
neighborhoods by race/ethnicity, national origin, or family status.
Patterns in Disparities in Access to Opportunity
Identify and discuss any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and
exposure to adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national
origin or familial status. Identify areas that experience an aggregate of
poor access to opportunity and high exposure to adverse factors. Include
how these patterns compare to patterns of segregation and R/ECAPs.
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 13 - Demographics and Environmental Health
Description: Environmental Health Ind ex with race/ethnicity, national origin, family status and R/ECAPs
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
% of Households that are
Families with Children
0% - 20%
20.1% - 40%
40.1% - 60%
60.1% - 80%
80.1% - 100%
TRACT
R/ECAP
Environmental Health Index
0 - 10
10.1 - 20
20.1 - 30
30.1 - 40
40.1 - 50
50.1 - 60
60.1 - 70
70.1 - 80
80.1 - 90
90.1 - 100
Environmental Health Index: Data
not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/29/2021
52
The analysis did not identify any overarching patterns of access to opportunity and/or exposure to
adverse community factors based on race/ethnicity, national origin, or family type. In general,
based on the data analyzed in the tables and maps, these protected class groups appear to have
similar levels of access to opportunity and exposure to adverse community factors.
Regarding areas that experience an aggregate of poor access to opportunity and high exposure to
adverse community factors, Census tract 432.16 has a Low Poverty Index value of 37 and a Labor
Market Index value of 37, indicating that residents in this area have high exposure to poverty and
low levels of labor market participation and human capital.
Disproportionate Housing Needs
Analysis
Which groups (by race/ethnicity and family status) experience higher rates
of housing cost burden, overcrowding, or substandard housing when
compared to other groups? Which groups also experience higher rates of
severe housing burdens when compared to other groups?
For the 2022 Consolidated Plan (ConPlan), the City of Temecula analyzed 2013-2017
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data to determine if particular race/ethnic
groups at various income levels disproportionately experience any of the following four housing
problems:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household lacks a sink with piped water, a range or
stove, or a refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household lacks hot and cold piped water, a flush
toilet and a bathtub or shower.
• Overcrowding: A household is considered overcrowded if there are more than 1.01 people
per room.
• Cost burden: A household is considered cost burdened if the household pays more than 30
percent of its total gross income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs include rent
paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage payment,
taxes, insurance, and utilities.
According to the analysis in the ConPlan, at least one racial/ethnic group is disproportionately
impacted by one or more of four housing problems in all income levels. Disproportionate impact
means that a particular group is more likely to experience housing problems when compared to
the population as a whole. As the table below shows, among Temecula households that earn up to
the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Native American, and Hispanic households are
more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four housing problems listed
above. Ninety-three percent (93%) of Black households, 89% of Native American households, and
84% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem. In comparison, 78% of
White households and 62% of Asian households experience at least one housing problem.
53
Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013-2017 5-
Year Estimates
The 2022 ConPlan also analyzes the disproportionate impact of severe housing problems by
race/ethnicity. Similar to housing problems, severe housing problems are defined as:
• Lacks complete kitchen facilities: Household does not have a stove/oven and refrigerator.
• Lacks complete plumbing facilities: Household does not have running water or modern
toilets.
• Severe overcrowding: A household is considered severely overcrowded if there are more
than 1.5 people per room.
• Severe cost burden: A household is considered severely cost burdened if the household
pays more than 50 percent of its total income for housing costs. For renters, housing costs
include rent paid by the tenant plus utilities. For owners, housing costs include mortgage
payment, taxes, insurance, and utilities.
As with the above analysis, the table below shows that, among Temecula households that earn up
to the area median income (0-100% of AMI), Black, Native American, and Hispanic households
are also more likely than other households to experience at least one of the four severe housing
problems listed above. Seventy-nine percent (79%) of Native American households, 72% of Black
households, and 61% of Hispanic households experience at least one housing problem. In
comparison, 48% of White households and 41% of Asian households experience at least one
housing problem.
54
Sources: 2013-2017 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy, American Community Survey 2013-2017 5-
Year Estimates
Which areas in the jurisdiction and region experience the greatest housing
burdens? Which of these areas align with segregated areas, integrated
areas, or R/ECAPs and what are the predominant race/ethnicity or national
origin groups in such areas?
Map 6 – Housing Problems is a series of maps showing concentrations of households experiencing
one or more housing burdens and population distribution by race/ethnicity and national origin, for
both Temecula and the region. On these maps, areas with darker shading have a higher percentage
of households experiencing at least one housing burden. Housing burdens in this context are: cost
burden, defined as paying more than 30% of income for monthly housing costs including utilities;
overcrowding; lacking a complete kitchen; and lacking plumbing. The maps show that
northwestern neighborhoods in Temecula have a high concentration of families experiencing one
or more of these housing burdens, compared to other neighborhoods. These maps also show there
is no apparent concentration of specific racial/ethnic or national origin groups in the areas with
high or low concentrations of housing burdens—as we have seen in other maps above, residents
of different races/ethnicities and national origins are fairly well integrated across Temecula.
In the region, there are high concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing
burdens to the east and to the north/northwest of Temecula. It appears that these areas with high
concentrations of families experiencing one or more of these housing burdens in the region (as
shown by darker shading) are also areas with concentrations of Hispanic residents, as well as
residents born in Mexico.
55
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and
race/ethnicity dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
Demographics 2010
1 Dot = 75
White, Non-Hisp anic
Black, Non-Hispanic
Native Americ an, Non-
Hispanic
Asian/Pacific Islander, Non-
Hispanic
Hispanic
Other, Non-Hispanic
Multi-racial, Non-Hispanic
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97 % - 61.9 %
61.9 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households with Burden:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/30/2021
HUD Affi rmat ively Fu rthering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experiencing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and
national origin dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdiction
Region
National Origin [Jurisdiction] (Top
5 most populous)
1 Dot = 75 People
Mexico
Philippines
Other South Eastern Asia
Other Central America
India
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97 % - 61.9 %
61.9 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households with Burden:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | County of Riverside, SanGIS, Bureau of …
0 1 2mi
Date creat ed: 11/30/2021
56
HUD Affirmat ively Furt hering Fair Housing Dat a and Map p ing Tool
Name: Map 6 - Housing Problems
Description: Households experienc ing one or more housing burdens in Jurisdiction and Region with R/ECAPs and
race/ethnicity dot density
Jurisdiction: Temecula (CDBG)
Region: Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA
HUD-Provided Data Version: AFFHT0006
Legend
Jurisdict ion
Region
TRACT
R/ECAP
Percent Households with Burden
< 33.19 %
33.19 % - 42.02 %
42.02 % - 50.97 %
50.97 % - 61.9 %
61.9 % - 100.0 %
Percent Households with Burden:
Data not Available
AFFHT0006 | Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, EPA, NPS
0 15 30mi
Date created: 11/30/2021
57
Describe the differences in rates of renter and owner occupied housing by
race/ethnicity in the jurisdiction and region.
The table below, titled “Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity”, shows the
percentages of households that are renters and homeowners by race/ethnicity, for Temecula and
the region. In Temecula, 64% of all households own their home, however there are significant
disparities by race/ethnicity. The homeownership rate for White, Non-Hispanic residents in
Temecula is highest, at 68%. Asian/Pacific Islander households have a comparable
homeownership rate of 65%. However, only 55% of Hispanic and Black households own their
home. For Native Americans, the homeownership rate is even lower, at 42%, however the
population numbers for Native Americans are quite small and therefore estimates are less accurate.
In the region, the overall homeownership rate (62%) is slightly lower compared to Temecula, but
similar disparities by race/ethnicity are present. Homeownership rates for White, Non-Hispanic
residents and Asian/Pacific Islander residents are even higher in the region (at 70%) than compared
to Temecula, while homeownership rates for Black residents are even lower (at 42%). The
homeownership rate for Native Americans is higher in the region than in Temecula (52% versus
42%), but still lower than most other groups. For Hispanic residents, homeownership rates in the
region and City are almost identical (56% and 55% respectively).
58
Total Households Total Households
Race/Ethnicity ##%#%##%#%
All Households 33,644 21,600 64%12,044 36%1,335,366 832,117 62%503,249 38%
White, Non-Hispanic 20,873 14,154 68%6,719 32%595,385 422,456 71%172,929 29%
Black 1,901 1,052 55%849 45%104,691 43,898 42%60,793 58%
Hispanic 7,222 3,944 55%3,278 45%522,460 291,047 56%231,413 44%
Asian or Pacific Islander 2,998 1,944 65%1054 35%87,005 60,820 70%26,185 30%
Native American 328 139 42%189 58%11,033 5,702 52%5,331 48%
Table - Homeownership and Rental Rates by Race/Ethnicity
Note 1: Data presented are numbers of households, not individuals.
Note 2: Data Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2013-2017 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates
Homeowners HomeownersRenters Renters
Temecula, CA (Jurisdiction)Riverside-San Bernardino-Ontario, CA (Region)
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 1 February 21, 2022
Draft Citizen Participation Plan
As required by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations found
at 24 CFR 91.105, this Citizen Participation Plan sets forth the City of Temecula policies and
procedures for providing citizens and other interested parties with opportunities to participate in
an advisory role in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG). The City receives CDBG funds annually from HUD, and this program is
administered through the Community Development Department.
As a recipient of CDBG funds, the City is required to produce the following documents:
1. Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments – a five-year planning document
that examines housing and demographic data to identify fair housing issues, determine
contributing factors and establish goals to take meaningful actions to address and
overcome any fair housing issues identified. The Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of
Impediments examines data to identify any patterns of integration and segregation, racially
or ethnically concentrated areas of poverty, disparities in access to opportunity and
disproportionate housing needs.
2. Consolidated Plan – a five-year plan that documents the City of Paramount’s housing and
community development needs, outlines strategies to address those needs and identifies
proposed program accomplishments. The Consolidated Plan includes the City’s policies
related to displacement of low- and moderate-income individuals, reducing poverty,
removal of lead-based paint hazards, preventing and mitigating homelessness and
affirmatively furthering fair housing choice.
3. Annual Action Plan – an annual plan that describes specific CDBG projects that will be
undertaken over the course of the fiscal year to meet the strategic plan goals of the
Consolidated Plan and to affirmatively further fair housing choice.
4. Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) – an annual report
that evaluates the City’s accomplishments and use of CDBG funds.
The primary objectives of the Citizen Participation Plan are to:
1. Encourage citizen participation by all Temecula residents in the development of the
Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan, Annual Action
Plans, and CAPERs, emphasizing the involvement of low- and moderate-income
residents, people living in locally-designated blight areas or primarily low- and moderate-
income neighborhoods, people living in neighborhoods where CDBG funds are proposed
to be used, people with disabilities, minorities, non-English speakers, and residents of
assisted housing.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 2 February 21, 2022
2. Encourage participation by all stakeholders in the development of the Assessment of Fair
Housing/Analysis of Impediments and Consolidated Plan, including but not limited to:
public and private agencies that provide assisted housing, health services, and social
services (including those focusing on services to children, elderly persons, persons with
disabilities, persons with HIV/AIDS and their families, homeless persons), community-
based and regionally-based organizations that represent protected class members,
organizations that enforce fair housing laws, the local homeless Continuum of Care, other
public and private agencies that address housing, health, social service, victim services,
employment, or education needs of low-income individuals and families; homeless
individuals and families, including homeless veterans; youth; and/or other persons with
special needs, publicly funded institutions and systems of care that may discharge
persons into homelessness (such as health-care facilities, mental health facilities, foster
care and other youth facilities, and corrections programs and institutions), state or local
health and child welfare agencies, Public Housing Agencies, resident councils, business
and civic leaders and adjacent Cities and regional government agencies, including local
planning and transportation agencies, particularly for strategies that go beyond a single
jurisdiction.
3. Give all citizens reasonable and timely access to meetings, information and records
relating to the City’s CDBG program.
4. Give all citizens the opportunity to identify and respond to proposed uses of funds.
5. Give all citizens the opportunity to review and comment on program performance.
This Citizen Participation Plan, together with other program documents may be provided in
alternative formats for persons with disabilities upon request.
For information on the CDBG program, citizen participation opportunities, the Assessment of Fair
Housing/Analysis of Impediments, the Consolidated Plan, Action Plans or CAPERs, please
contact the CDBG Consultant in the Community Development Department. Brandon Rabdiou,
Senior Management Analyst – Brandon.Rabdiouh@TemeculaCA.gov
Public Hearings/ Community Meetings
1. At least two public hearings/ meetings will be held each year to obtain citizen’s views about
housing and community development needs, proposed uses of funds, strategies and
actions for affirmatively furthering fair housing and review of program performance. These
meetings will take place at different stages of the year (e.g., in conjunction with the Action
Plan in the spring and the CAPER in the fall). At least one meeting will be held during the
development of, and prior to publishing the Assessment of Fair Housing or Consolidated
Plan for comment.
2. The City will ensure adequate public notice before each public hearing, with sufficient
information published about the subject of the hearing to facilitate informed comment.
Public hearings/ meetings will be announced in the newspaper at least two weeks prior to
the hearing.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 3 February 21, 2022
3. The City will hold all public hearings and public meetings at times and locations accessible
to potential and actual beneficiaries. Reasonable accommodations will be made for people
with disabilities upon advance request.
4. The City will provide interpretation services for non-English speaking residents at public
hearings upon advance request, provided such services are available.
Development of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and
Annual Action Plans
1. The City will make a concerted effort to notify citizens and stakeholders of the development
of the Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and
Annual Action Plans through mailings (including electronic mailings), online postings and
public notices in the newspaper.
2. The City will conduct workshops at various and convenient times to inform and educate
citizens and interested stakeholders on the development of the Assessment of Fair
Housing/Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans. The City
will solicit input from residents and stakeholders through these workshops, interviews
and/or surveys.
3. The City will make any HUD-provided data and any other supplemental information for the
Assessment of Fair Housing and Consolidated Plan available via the City website.
4. Upon request, the City will provide technical assistance to groups representing low- and
moderate-income persons to develop proposals for eligible activities in situations when
CDBG funds are made available to the public through a Notice of Funding Availability or
Request for Proposals process.
5. The City will publish its proposed Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments,
Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans for review and comment. The City will publish
public notices describing the purpose of the Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans
and listing the locations where full copies of the draft plans may be examined.
6. Before the City adopts the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments,
Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plans, the City will make available to citizens and
other interested parties information that includes the amount of funds the City expects to
receive, the range of activities that may be undertaken, the amount of funds that will benefit
low- and moderate-income residents, and any planned activities likely to result in
displacement.
7. The City will receive and consider written comments on the proposed Assessment of Fair
Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans for a
minimum period of 30 days and will hold public hearings/ meetings prior to adopting the
final Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans.
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 4 February 21, 2022
Amendments to the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan
and Annual Action Plans
1. The City will amend its approved Assessment of Fair Housing/Analysis of Impediments
when it is determined by HUD or the City that there is a material change that requires the
revision. A material change is a change in circumstances in the City that affects the
information on which the Assessment of Fair Housing is based to the extent that the
analysis, the fair housing contributing factors, or the priorities and goals of the Assessment
of Fair Housing no longer reflect actual circumstances.
2. The City will amend its approved Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan whenever it
makes one of the following decisions:
a. To carry out a project not previously described in the Annual Action Plan using
funds covered by the Consolidated Plan, including program income.
b. To substantially amend the purpose, scope, location, or beneficiaries of a project.
c. To substantially amend the allocation priorities or the method of distributing funds.
3. A substantial amendment is defined as the following:
a. An amendment of the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments that
is considered a material change;
b. An addition, modification, or elimination of a Consolidated Plan goal;
c. An addition of a new project not previously identified in the Annual Action Plan.
d. A change in a project after the adoption of the Annual Action Plan that meets one
of the following thresholds:
i. a net increase or decrease greater than 50% of the original allocation of
CDBG funds to the project if the original allocation was $50,000 or more;
ii. a net increase or decrease greater than 100% of the original allocation of
CDBG funds to the project if the original allocation was less than $50,000;
or
iii. a net increase or decrease greater than $400,000.
4. Substantial amendments to the approved Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of
Impediments, Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan must be authorized by the City
Council and will be made public by publishing notices in the newspaper. Minor changes
and/or corrections may be made to the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of
Impediments, Consolidated Plan and Annual Action Plans, so long as the changes do not
constitute a substantial amendment. Minor changes, including but not limited to
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 5 February 21, 2022
modifications of Consolidated Plan or Action Plan goal outcome indicators, are not
considered a substantial amendment and will not require public review or a public hearing.
5. The City will receive and consider written comments on substantial amendments to this
Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments,
Consolidated Plan or Annual Action Plan for a minimum period of 30 days and will hold a
public hearing to receive comments on substantial amendments prior to implementing
those amendments.
Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Reports (CAPERs)
1. The City will prepare a CAPER each year to notify citizens of the accomplishments of the
previous program year and the progress of the Consolidated Plan and Assessment of Fair
Housing.
2. Citizens will be afforded notice of the CAPER through online postings and public notices
in the newspaper.
3. The City will receive and consider comments on the CAPER for 15 days before the public
hearing to authorize submission of the report to HUD.
Access to Information and Records
1. Any citizen or stakeholder may submit written requests for information regarding the
Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, Consolidated Plan, Annual Action
Plan and CAPER, including the City’s use of funds under the CDBG program and the
benefit to low- and moderate-income residents during the preceding five years.
2. This Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing, Consolidated Plan, the
current Annual Action Plan, the current CAPER, and any substantial amendments to these
plans will be available for public review in the Community Development Department and
on the City website. A reasonable number of free copies of these documents are available
upon request.
3. The local Public Housing Agency will be provided access to the Assessment of Fair
Housing strategies and Consolidated Plan projects that may impact their activities.
4. Upon request, the City will make reasonable efforts to provide documents and records in
a format accessible to persons with disabilities.
Limited English Proficiency
In accordance with the City’s Limited English Proficiency Plan (LEP), the City will translate and
publish notices and other vital documents (e.g., marketing, brochures, program applications) as
determined by the Language Access Plan.
Comments, Complaints and Appeals
City of Temecula
Draft Citizen Participation Plan 6 February 21, 2022
The City will consider any comments of citizens received in writing or orally at public hearings in
preparing this Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of
Impediments, the Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial
amendments to the aforementioned documents. A summary of all comments will be attached to
the Citizen Participation Plan, the Assessment of Fair Housing/ Analysis of Impediments, the
Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and substantial amendments to these
documents. Complaints may be made via telephone by calling (951) 694-6400 or in writing to:
Community Development Department/CDBG, City of Temecula, 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA
92590. The complaining party should state the nature of the complaint, what prior efforts have
been made to resolve the problem and any other pertinent information which would help staff
determine a solution.
1. The City will respond to written complaints received by the Community Development
Department/CDBG, City of Temecula relating to the Assessment of Fair Housing,
Consolidated Plan, Annual Action Plans, CAPERs, and/or substantial amendments to
these documents. Written complaints must describe the objection, provide supporting
information and provide contact information of the complainant. Where practicable, the
City will respond to complaints within 15 working days of receiving the written complaint,
acknowledging the letter and identifying a plan of action, if necessary.
2. Appeals to complaint responses should be made to the following persons in order:
Director of Community Development
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
City Manager
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
City Council
41000 Main Street
Temecula, CA 92590
Director of Community Planning and Development
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
300 N. Los Angeles Street, Suite #4054
Los Angeles, CA 90012
Special Exceptions and Waivers
In accordance with the waivers authorized by the CARES Act, the City may elect to conduct
expedited public comment periods (5 days) for activities associated with the CDBG-CV program.