Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06012022 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 1, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Adam Ruiz ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of May 18, 2022Recommendation: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda June 1, 2022 Action MinutesAttachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision . Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Planning Application No. PA20-1371, a Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road, Scott Cooper Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-1371, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 349 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY BUILT ON 15.1 ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF DATE STREET, APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET SOUTH OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-042, 916-400-042), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Recommendation: Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval Fiscal Impact Analysis Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda June 1, 2022 COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, June 15, 2022, at 6:00 PM, Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 3 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA MAY 18, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Vice Chair Lanae Turley-Trejo ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio (absent), Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Hagel. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of May 4, 2022 2. Director's Hearing Summary Report Recommendation: Receive and File Director's Hearing Summary Report Receive and file only, no action. BUSINESS 3. General Plan Consistency Review of the Proposed Draft Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program Budget Sheets (Long Range Planning Project Number LR22-0503), Mark Collins Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE PROPOSED DRAFT FISCAL YEARS 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET SHEETS AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION 2 UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4), 15061(B)(3), AND 15262 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-0503) Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 6:46 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, June 1, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Gary Watts, Chairperson Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: June 1, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-1371, a Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolutions approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: No further environmental review required Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: ReyLenn Properties General Plan Designation: Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) Zoning Designation: Harveston Specific Plan (SP-13) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) North: Vacant Land / Specific Plan Implementation (SPI), Service Commercial (SC) South: Interstate 15, Vacant Land / Service Commercial (SC) East: Date Street Right of Way, Vacant Land / Service Commercial (SC), Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) West: Interstate 15 / N/A 2 Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Parking Provided/Required: 645 Parking Spaces 645 Parking Spaces BACKGROUND SUMMARY On December 1, 2020, the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan was approved by the City Council. As part of that Specific Plan Amendment a Residential Overlay area was established which allows for the development of up to 1,000 residential units on an 87.54-acre portion of Planning Area 12. On December 2, 2020, ReyLenn Properties submitted Planning Application No. PA20-1371, a Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street, approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Rd. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project is located in the Residential Overlay Area of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan on 15.1 acres. The project proposes a 349-unit apartment community. The proposed architecture, landscaping, and walls and fences were reviewed for conformance with the development standards and design guidelines of the Specific Plan. The project consists of eight three-story residential buildings, and a single story clubhouse building. There are 21 studio units that range that are 573 square feet, 122 one-bedroom units that range in size from 672 square feet to 710 square feet, 170 two-bedroom units that range in size from 1,016 square feet to 1,101 square feet, 27 three-bedroom units that range in size from 1,301 square feet to 1,332 square feet, and 9 town homes that are 1,755 square feet. The vehicular access to the project is from two separate locations along Temecula Center Drive which both allow for full ingress and egress movements. Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the project is required to provide 645 parking spaces within the community of which 385 are required to be covered. The project proposes 645 parking spaces including 385 covered spaces. Community Amenities Per the Harveston Specific Plan, the residents of residential projects developed within the Residential Overlay Area will not have access to the existing private recreational center within Harveston. Each residential development within the overlay shall provide private recreation areas. The project contains a wealth of community amenity spaces that include:  An approximately 11,245 square foot clubhouse building that includes a fitness/gym facility, arcade, pickleball court, community area, mail/parcel rooms, and a dog wash.  Pool/spa area at the clubhouse that includes a outdoor kitchen area, fireplace, seating/dining areas, cabanas. 3  Tot lot  Separate BBQ and sitting areas  Bike racks  Dog park Architecture The buildings are of a Spanish colonial architectural style which is an allowed style per the Harveston Specific Plan. The architectural elements of the proposed buildings include decorative vents and iron work, towers, light colored stucco with brown trim, and arches. Landscaping While there is not a minimum landscape coverage percentage within the Residential Overlay the project does propose a myriad of landscaping within the landscape development zones along Date Street and Temecula Center Drive, in the recreational areas, and along the frontages of the garages to soften the massing of the buildings. Plant types used throughout the project include crape myrtle, coast live oak, Idaho locust, purple leaf plum, and red yucca. Growth Master Plan/Community Benefit On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Action Plan (GMP) which is intended to serve as the City Council’s policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures in the City of Temecula. The GMP applies when projects involve specific land use decisions including General Plan Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments. Consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the previously approved Specific Plan Amendment (PA18-0660) contains requirements for all future residential projects within the Residential Overlay to provide Community-wide public benefits that provide substantial added value to the entire community and citizens of Temecula commensurate with the scope of the project to fulfill the requirements of the City’s GMP. The Community-wide public benefit for the project is a $750,000.00 payment to the City of Temecula which will in turn be used by the City of Temecula for city-wide projects that benefit the residents of the City. The payment shall be made prior to the issuance of the first residential multi-family or commercial building permit for the project. Fiscal Impact Analysis The City’s fiscal policies requires that a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) be completed for any development that proposes an increase in residential density from what is currently allowed in the General Plan. The previously approved General Plan Amendment (PA18-0659) changed the land use of the Residential Overlay from Service Commercial (SC) to Specific Plan Implementation (SPI) to allow for future residential development. However, it was unknown, at the time, the size of the residential projects that would be proposed so it was not possible to prepare an FIA without individual projects to analyze. The Harveston Specific Plan, as amended, requires that any residential projects within the Residential Overlay prepare a FIA. The Harveston Specific Plan provides that the FIA is to evaluate the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the project by estimating the fiscal impact on the General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed project over a 20-year time period. If the FIA 4 determines that the increased cost to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the project area will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the project (“City Services Deficit”), the project shall be conditioned to require the payment of funds to t he City for negative impact on the General Fund, that is, the project shall be conditioned to pay the City the loss to General Fund revenues created by the project as determined by the FIA. The applicant prepared a FIA in compliance with this requirement. The FIA found that the project would result in a City Services Deficit. The project is being conditioned to require that the owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of One Hundred Ten Dollars ($110.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of twelve point eight percent (12.8%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Specific Plan area for building permits for residential construction have been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re- evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. The project condition provides that the Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on May 19, 2022 and mailed to the property owners within 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003, by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020, in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 5 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 349-unit apartment community is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. FINDINGS Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a multifamily residential community at the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 6 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A - Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Fiscal Impact Analysis 6. Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA 7. Notice of Determination 8. Notice of Public Hearing PLYMOUTHW AYDALTON RDBRANDONLN CHARLESBURGDRANSELMO WAY OAKHURSTW AYCANTON CTF A IR M O N T P L ABERDEEN LN CLARION CT EQUITY DR YNEZ R D W AVERLYLNANNAPOLIS DRMA D I S ONAVEL O CK HAV E N CT CORRIGANPLDATESTMED FORDRD TEMECULACENTERDRProject Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-1371 0 400 800200 Feet\Date Created: 12/3/2020 1:5,0001 inch = 417 feet 916-400-042 The map PA20-1371.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis !"#$15 PROJECT DIRECTORY DEVELOPER/APPLICANT: .,,~,,.,cft,m.< .. ,snDRO&A\"F- s.A. \S.\ IIE.\l11, c_. ~1'>"'~ nm:<EC .. .,,,.,.J,N') m1,n;F,l<l(f,\l.P,~.-:..~ ARCHITECT .\Tr.' J\.\!CS:~Ct'(l~c'>TH :::,~f.\k.l.\•.WA\1'~"1."f. <'Al<l.:11',ln,t:AY:0.> run~'!' ,1,,.,·,1-so;• E.\IAIL J.\l ... "('.(W}."'fLL(!-.RJ..AllC1!1Jl;<;"l.S~T.1 CIVIL ENGINEER: ,\ll,1t,\l:l.ll,V,.Elll~"11:R:<.,11u-..U. \TT:-' MIUl/t:l,<lU'-"!AL~$ ,.,.,oro1.:~,.,-cu,-rr.RuR•l0« 111U!>'f:o•Jl)!-<l•)!i) ~MOS'/..\! H@'-11,,U:Otl'-TI. ,·o,'1 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: ~iJ~}!gB1?-t;:::~-~rnE1>o WV).1: ~ll(;,,~><J?IE-'1.T "" ~t<l\li~s,s.,,~un:sc"'t ELECTRICAL ENGINEER: S\L\S,JIIRIES AT'l'S tH~'\o ~11«:unuo l.)A\"l""IIICllrlFl.D~.tAI.ASOl,kIES.C'O\I SHEET INDEX &!EETNO. CIVIL: Cfl.'ll TllLESHEET Cot<CEPTUAI.GR>OINOl'\.AN 1,/JJ. PATH Of TIO,VR WETUlltlllES/FIIIE/.CCUS HOOOCONTROL A.CCESS LANDSCAPE: ,., 81.111.0ING~ElEVATIONS BUII.OINGlElEVA110,lS l!Ult.lllNoeiJ£lEV,t,110NS BUllllNGOElEVAIIOl'S 6UIUJING~fl(VAT10f1S 8Ulu.lOJ[lEV,._TIONS BlllOING5EtEVAIIONS 6Ull0aiOSEtlVA110HS 8UllOINOiElEVATIONi BUILDrfa 7£LEV.-.TIOIIS 8UILOS'l07El.£V ATIOH5 BlAl.o.tG5ElEVATIOtlS 800.0JialElE\IATIOIIS Q.UIIHOUSE£lEV,1,.llo,<S CLUIIHOV$EUEV,1,.T1QNS SWOIHG!SECIIOf<I IIULCWIO)M:.:TION Butl.OINGJUCTIOH 800.0ING!SECTION BUILl»/OS&E.:TlON B\.IILOIH0,r.ECTIOtl BllllOINtl7S£CTIC!H B~OING5SEC"IOI( CI.U8l10ll&ESECTI0H Gf>Nl~COI.OHIAlCOUP\.IAAC[ElCHBIT COHCEf'fUAlVIEWS CCIHCEf'IU,1,.L\'IEWS <N£Ul\LJ,l<DS:IJ'f.PUN lNLAAGllfUfr6 O<lJJ'IOlNUfrl n'l'l::Al.l'l .... Tl'OOl>Ll,ll -~- ELECTRICAL: REQUIRED PARKING CALCUlATIONS S/lBR 2BR 38R TOTAL FIATS 143 170 27 340 UNITS TO\VNHOMES 9 9UN!TS TOTAi. 143 170 J6 349 UNITS PARKING RATIO I.SO l.00 z.s STAlLS/UNrt REQUIREMENT 214.S 340 90 64SSTAU5 PROVIDED PARKING STANDARD PARKING· OPEN 207 STAUS STANDARD PARKING - CARPORTS 17JSTAllS HC PARKING· OPEN 11 (2VAN) HCP ARKING· CARPORT 2 STAllS EV PARKING- OPEN 39STAllS EV PARKING- CARPORT 2STAU5 HC PARKING - EV ACCESS!Blf (1 VAN, 1 STANDARD, 1 AMBUlA TORVJ 3STALL5 TUCKUNOER GARAGES 190 STALLS TOWN HOME GARAGES 18STALLS TOTAL G4S STALLS £Vf'ARlQII0 Hl"~Ol'OPOIPAR;QN30N6HE HEVSTA.LlS1H7101AlOPENIT.-tlSONSll[I U EVSlA.LUllNCI.UOf lCAAPQIIIT AA0 JHCEV6TA.LLS(1 VA/~. 1 STNIDAIIONiO I N.l!IUV,.lOII.Y~ A.LLOAAAOES Sl-<Al.l H,l,.\'E AMN!lo!VMONE lhlllC><>,ETAI,. rl.E)l::CONOIJU 11\lllf"Ol,<l,IEl'EII 1!.0 l( TO THEOAA-'0€ flllEWAl..l A.'IO ~::::t[OIIIA...UAI..BO<"-TfOII.TV•TW:>1CJIHCHE&AIIO'JEfl~EDflo.;)RfQIIF1,l1UR[El.£Cfl!IC~lEc>WIGIN:i OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS PftlVATE0PEN6PACE A MINIMUM OF !!oOSOUAREFEEl' AN0MNIMUMDIMENSI0NOF SFEET FOR £ACHGll0VN[).LEVEL UN1151W.LBEPROV10ED ASPftfV,1,.TEOPENSPACE. COMMO!iOPENSPACE AMIN'WMOl'200SOVAAEfEETPEIIUNITSIW.LBEP!!OV\DEDASCOMMOIIOPENSPACE C0MMO!iOPENSPACEIIEO\/IIIE0)OUNIT$ll.,'OOSf.•!i9.&00S.F Pl:UV,1,.TEOP£N!;PACEPl!0\i\DE0 1.E..:;IIGIIOIIN0FLOOIIUIIIT ftA9,1,.PAII0l'ollHAAEAOFIMll.1SCS.F.fRE Al-1 STREET LEVEi. SITE l>LAJIAN04.18UL0RIGl>LNl9f l. £/,CH UPPEI! FLOOR Ul~I K,1,.,5 ,1,.8AJ..C0NY. IOIAL PII0\10EOOP£N Sl>.O.CE ,1,.lUPPEII HOOi! IW.COl~ES >l,11~&1, JI![ ._. Ullll l'V-NS! COl.!.',IQI/Of>EH5PA::El'll0Vl0£07J,07SS.F.{IIE·A1.JlilfEl>LN<> PROJECT SCHtDU LE - Solana Winrhe~ter Hills UNITMIX VNil !YI'[ AREA rorAREA QI> PERIYPl .. SI "' 12,033 21 21 6.0"- Al 672 29,568 A2 710 55,380 78 122 35.(m 81 I.OJ6 85.344 .. " H~-18 1.055 1S.ll0 " 83 1,101 68,262 62 JIO ... ,,, Cl 1,301 11,109 C2 1.332 23.916 18 27 '·"' 1}1-J l,755 15,795 9 26% TOIAL 327,387 "' "'1 JOO,, PROJ[CTTOTAL5 349UNlTS 327.387 5.F. AVEAAG(UNIT AREA 938Sf GEl'!V,CKG FIIOMOA•E&TIIEEl';\Jlll!ANAR'Efll.\L••!,,l")1Y T'WO-STORVI0\\11110•JEsm01,1\ll,TlfAMII.V.:,- TllREE-SlOR>'T0\',1-IHOME6NIO ... ULnfMl!lY:~· SCOPE OF WORK: BUILDING CODE DATA (2019 CBC) ElECTRICAl\/ElllctEOil'.IIGi'IG.AJ.lu>.RAGEtt!«LLHA\1£AUl:~J,tU1,1QHE\1JIUCH"IEl"LflOCOl'IOUU!IUNfROMNEl'[lltoll.TOTHE t::~.~'!~~·it"o TER,.111,1,.tEDII/ A •~ET"' &o.:< .lT fOII.IY•lWO\'lj It.CHES "80'/E. FMSIIED HOOft FOR FUIURE ElECTRICVE>CClE HOTE PIIOVIDEEI.ECTRICAlCOIID'JJ1f0RfUTUIIESIIE£VCHAAG•IO\~ITll[LECIAICAI.C.\P,l,.C!fVfORS11EPAAOQll30lll'i.OAAAOE5PACE ~;ui!ttc~1~~i:::1~~~~;;ue:z~:t::~~LE0,:,~~,:~~~~~:~~EE~~~;::'..,.,Ofl 'l!Ecwv.::E~PACES VICINITY MAP NTS MAP l'!AR\'ESTOHPi:ClflCPLAI.I Pv,mi,10AAE.lll EAfiTOf\-1~.Wl:STOl'Yl'IElllOAO. NORTllOf'Sll-79SOIJTllOfT[M£l-i.'V. CEIITUDIU\'E PROJECT DATA PROJECT DATA rARCEL l (APN NO .. 916-400,042'8) jMRC.ll9,Af.Stl0WII 011 llffMAf'lllllfL{S 1•1'11MCHt1.APNO.l6ll6"~1UOAUGUSI 20,lOlSIII 1800K 239 OF PAA CH ,APS, AT PAG[S 33 TliROUGli 1 J9,lNClUSIVE,"IV(RSl0£COUIITYIIEC.011DS . PARCU 2:IAPNN0.916•4()()-05.8-3) PJ\IICll C AS SHOWN ON !OT t1I/[ A0JUSIM£NI NUMBER PAIS·U34, A5 fVlDfNCED BY DOCUMfNT jRtCOROEO OEClMB£R IS. 2015 A~ 11/STRUMENT NUM8Ell l015·0S421l5 Of OHICIAI. RECORDS. l Sl't(lflC PL.:.Nlr..'PlEMfN'TAllOll(Sflj lllSI V!~TONSP(ClflC rt.AN {SP-Ill R[!,!O[NTIAI. OVERLAY· fLAt;tllNG AREA 12 fPA-12! TOIAlGROSSAAtk TOJAlNtl/JIU.: 657,7S6SQFT.(15.IACR[S) 4S7,8ISSQ.H.[10.SACRCSJ TOTAlflUILOINGAIIEA LOT(OV(flAG(: lANDKAPlNGAREA: 18l,ll9SQ.Fl.(27.5%J 199,941SQ.R.IJ04%) 276,696SQ.R. 0.1% 1~6SPACESPROVIOEO [lff.1%1 ACC£S518l£ PAR~tNG ·CARPORTS·: HSSPACHPR0\'10£0 27.l"I 25PAC(SPROVIOED (INC.lUOINGCARPORIS, /IDT lt.c\UD114G L\' n Sl'ACESrROVIOtO [U SPN::£SREQUIR£0] PX) ACCESSl&tf. TUCmNOUIGAAAG{S. 190SPAC[SPROVIOED(l9.5~1 TOWN HO Mi GAAAGES. 18 SPACH PROVIDED (1 81') lOTAl PAJl~ING· 6115 SPAC ES Pfl0V10£0 645 Sl'AC{S R(QUlR£0 ILOOJIAJ\lARAIIO 0.75 HIIOU/ACR! OCCUMIICY ClASSIOCATIOII· 112 HlGH DEN511Y RtSIO(h'flAL 1 3·10 OU/AC ti.AA.) TYPlOrCONSTRUCTION· VA flH( Wlllllr,l(RS ANO /Ok A.tl\R M: SPRIN~l{R SYSTEM NFPA 13R NUt."BlROtSIOl!llS )STOIUES MAX. PROPOSlO 8U!LOING HllGtil (!,O" !,wt ALLOWED ,IJ',0" IIUkDlll:i I 11',!1!'2 &.f.! 10<.171 &F. RESIDEllTIAI.. • AIIO 10 SIi S.f. TUC~•UIIDEII G,1,.11"-lES! BtAl.OHHH~,·ns.f.\0',621S.F.IIESIDf.WIAt'A.IID6,S005.f,"\JCK-UNDEIIGAA,1,.:;ESJ BUllDI..Ol l!;.•.Ss.f.(Jl,aHS.f.REtlOEIHl,l,.l'MD•.1,1tS.f.fUCK,UHOEIIOAIIA:J£S1 BUllOING• l6.~l~S.F,\J1,19JS.F.RESl0£HTIAL' AAD!,6195.f. 1\JCK-UIIDElltlAR,1,.GESI B\!ROlNG S 62.1o6 S.F.! !,ti ~ 5.f. RESWEHTW.' A.11D6 112 6,f, TIJ('~•UIIDER Gil/I AGES) BUllDING<i ~~.G'SS.f,1Sl,es15.f.RESIOENIW.0 N<01.1!•9.F,1UC~.YNDEIIGAR.o.GU• .... l!IA<.DNQ7,JS.W S.F. 1 ll,517.$ f ,RE&I0UTIM.',~ND I.JI~& f. WC~·UUDUllARX.l£5; ------tl--_- __ H-_- .... ~.e.L'!~•-•<;1_a_~.~1_•_~~·,!_S~.'.:~~!:~~~~~~~:~1:l~·.1~~!'.•:~~~!'!'~.~~e.s! .. 'IIESIOENTIAl,.IIICLI/OESUV"81.EAAEA,IW.CO!G[g.o>ATl:)S~0BUlllllll(;COIIE 'U'Al llV"8LEAIIEA.FOll "llEPl!UJEC" Ui.»7 $.f, (~E' UNI' ljl(~J.8LEI SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 03/2J/1DU - A0-1 TEMECULA CALI FORNIA PARKING STALL LEGEND ~-=•-- .......... __ .;._ -......... '-..~ -?" n•-,.WOM<>CN __ __- ,, \ \ \\ \: \ \ \ \ ... \ \ > I \ )\ \ I \\\\ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A1-1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA f>CIX S.....,,C..C.,_."°""t, •=.,....,••THOl-...n ------ sntf<:U O'--'"'·----"\ '- ... ....._,....._ ~--~---, PHASE PLA N LEGEND I ' ~PH t..SE1t.. Cl PH ASE1B IIIPHASE4 .. PHASES IIIPHASE6 §. --~D HATC><INOICATESOPENSPACE §.aoCJS.f.Of'£NSPACEREOUIRED ~Sf.COMMONDPENSPACEl'ROVm£ll -➔1, ---~ ~~~~-~~=~~=====~~= .... ·· ' J~~--1 , ~ \' \ :·ffis_::'· 'oiro~~~SE~~~NCE A~~~~:~r~~~~~~F5LA~ -=-~---- ~~t'~_ - - - 7-'i~ =----------------------------<C) ' • '1<!f-(IIM>(fl~OOJ .-·-....,, . . '·, __ ~·~t::~:· , r « I SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEM ECU LA CALIFO RNIA A1-2 ~ ~ .. PHASES ~PH.<..SE9 II ■ ■ '"'"""'"" LEGE ND : --- SITE BOUNDARY, TYP. f- I 9' BUILDING SETBACK AT TEMECULA CENTER DRIVE ---1 AND LIMIT OF '1fl WIDE lDZ ZONE - - I 10' BUR.ONG SETBACK FROM LANDSCAPE BUFFER LINE ---1 LIMITS OF 13' l.Dl. MEASURED FROM RO.W. ----i 50' 1.ANDSCN'E BUFFER ---1 ~ FIRE. DEPARTMENT HOSE PULL ~----:.:__--:.-:::-1 24'-0' MIN. WIDE FIRE LN-IE ~ I KNOX BOX, TYP. t.WOIIT,TYP. I' \\ \\ I I \' \\ I I \\ \ I Ii •~, 'FIRE ACCESS PLA N \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\\\ \\ \\\\ \\\I \\\\ ii\\ I \ \\\\ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA II ■ ■ A1-3 ~ ::::::::::::::: ~ 0 ""' 8UllDINGlUNITMIX AREA TOTAREA QTY £73 1,719 67l 10,752 16 ,., ,., 710 1}.760 18 1.016 30.480 30 l.055 6,330 6 34 38.2% I.IOI (.1 C> 1,301 1,332 11,0lO 10 7,992 tlH a es • JS~ TOlAL 1,755 81.063 ~ 0 89UNITS Sl,0635.F. GARII.Gl PM\K!NG PROVIOCD I.- \>J GROUND FLOOR PATIO-150 S.F./DU TYP. ----+I,@ n,..,-,,,.,,,,.,..,,,-,,,.,,.,,,,,...,, Al4t<.O~•UU.:.ruc,c,;".° ::>,•-·"~~I.CR~~;,::-"< .: L::::·:--~·=~:::~~~"--T .. ,,;,; BUILDING 1 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN ~v,.., ... o=· ========-------CD KEY PLAN PA~t~!31lSlim llTT .>JAI II ■ ■ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA Cl/17/1021 - A2-1.1 C A L IF O R N IA c,,.,,,,':',,.r,.,,, ;:; ::i:':'fo:::; BU ILDING 1 S v,,•,,-o· - ECOND AND T HIRD FLOOR p LAN CD KEY PLAN SOLANA WI NCH TEMECULA ESTER HILLS CALIFORNIA A2-1.2 . em, ~ , .'~:.: : R OO F LE G EN D : R OO F T R.E S : BARCELONAGARHET BLENO rROMSORAL RAFTER TAILS Q 24" 0. C. TYP. □□□□□ ROOFWAL~NGPADS II ROOFMECHANICALUNrr. TYP. ~ TYP.ROOFSLOPE r '' I m . ' . 0 0 0 0 0 (•) (<) 0 0 0 ., i ·-···r I © I 1.-..li,lll~.l..l.l.l.~:.l.lllo!'P'"' I I L ?f_::~=~~ _OJ 0 : ' I ~ "~ ROOF PITCH 3112" 112", TYPICAL All SLOPED ROOFS I ~B~U~IL~D~IN~G~1'.....:·:..:.R~O:::O:::_F_:,P~L:::A:..:N CD KEY PLAN ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS PA20-IJ1I SUBMIITAJ..t'J 02/17/"lflll - A2-1.3 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA C•••••.,N•''"''' ::..,1:m::1-:::: KEY PLAN lVI'( AREA TOT ARCA QTY PCR Ti'P[ '- 573 1,719 l 3 6.S% S,376 8 1.016 9,141 9 l.OSS 9.4!15 9 1.101 6.606 1,301 7,806 l,lll 3.996 3 1,755 3,Sl0 2 '4,3'6 47,652 46 46 100% Bl/lLDING1Rt51D.TOTAL: 46UNIT5 47,6S2 S.f. GAR.AG{ PARKING PROVIDfO; -0 I>/;._.;·., GROUND FLOOR PATIO- 150 S.F.IDU TYP. lP:PI,•':', aw,~•"l·'t•:U'E"J''lll' <1t'ntt<ru> "'"""'"''".._...,,,,.n,....,.,,._,. ,u,ni>..-,1<v,,.,.,....,...,,. .. tr.11,,~•£<mLvnu,u"'-'"'"-""' =~-...,~..-&~~~~•~~;:~,':;~~•'\ ,\'::i~"'•••"-'"- no·,..., Mtn•"""' .u.,un.r,.-nu.nnc·ru:..i.,,.,r:.,~-.,mu.,.,.- •\!Q,n'l\ffDl'•'"'"'""'-•'""<Ntlllorl'D'1,Mucnrn-.ru,. - " ·x-,.~ ,.__,.,..,..,..,,,...,,..,., OPE116PACECO\JRTYa'JIO RE_L~DSCM'£011,._\',\UGS , . .,, ~,~,'_:DING 2 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0) ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA Cl/17/WU - A2-2.1 ::::,:w,t, """'"""" 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 T KEY PLAN 0 0 BUILDING 2 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -,,,-,.-,1·--0-----------------<0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS rA~•~IJ"I Sl'D~DTT .\.L~~ fT.1/11/»:U - A2-2_2 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA '"'"""'"" 0 0 0 0 I / " r: :ii :1 ,ll 11 :Jj ~:::+ :i .·•··•EE3·=-- =,a~-, : I ' I -~=- J __ ...J ©------------ 0 0 / ------ -- -- - 0 / MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING ... ,,- --- --- - 0 0 KEY PLAN ROOF LEGEND: ROOFTILES: BAAatoNA GAANCT &LEND FROM901W.. RAFTERTAILS@24"0.C. TYP. 00000 ROOFWAU<IHGPADS ■ ROOF MECHANICAL UNIT, TYP. ~ TYP.ROOFSLOPE .,,·(l~ ROOF CRICKET 1 ~ .. ~ ROOFPITCH3112"112".TYPICALALLSLOPEOROOFS I =,~...;;;.~,---'l;_D_I N_;G;_2~- R;...;_O.;;_O.;;_F;__PL_A_c;_N..;___CD r.UO-U71 IUBMnTALf5 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS Cl2/ll/JCl21 - A2 -2.3 ■■■ TEMECULA CALIFORNIA KEY PLAN !ha , 't£1'11''U W "D""l'71.., Q L\TIS.,..n '1»<U.ot U ..,.~< ... 11-.,.,:U JW .J.MIJ llDC ., ... '!U>L YJ><ll'CI ·. •'-'' .,......,,,, ......... (11.,>!l .U.ll,•n. .. _.. ...... ~....n ............... ,,._,,..:w ... ma:->.TOntlalU<llnnc•"'·-'-"""'-'""'" N ....... ..__,,..,..,..TO"<,(•:, ,.....,.,.....,.'L,.,.'NII.D "-'-n•n.-nuus,.nx ,'tM<l..0 <11.u w -"""" ,,.....,,,. •at•••••.n...., :;:,;.,..n..,.,_....,. ""'r•~'!""1\U.UJ"A~'""""'D"-""-"'""""'V"•''UTlWOZJl1,.o •·• A·l 1.719 3 3 12.!N 612 l3-1-I })0 4,260 1,016 (i.006 I.OS'> U01 6.606 6 480'/i 1,lO I 1,332 0.0'>& 1,755 asro 1 2 8.~ 23 ,53S 25 2S l~ 2S UNITS 23 ,535 5.F. I:·.·.·:--:· -1 GROUND FLOOR PATIO-150 S.F./DU TYP. BUILDING 3 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN -3,-3,--.-,..-0----------------------------------------------CD PA~l~l Pl SLTB~UTT.\.Lk~ II II II SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-3.1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA '""'""'"" KEY PLAN BUILDING 3 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -31-32--,1·.-0-------------------------------------0 l',\~M 1•1 St"B~HTr .\l.•~ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-3.2 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ,.,,.,.,.,,,,,, MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING . --~-------,., KEY PLAN '· I 0 ROOF LEGEND: ROOfTlLES: 8ARCll.ONAGARNETBl.£HD '""'"""' RAFTER TALS@24"0.C. TYP. 00000 ROOF W AI.KI NG PADS • ROOF MECHANICAL Utfl, TYP. TYP . ROOF SLOPE ,r ~3112" ROOF PITCH 3112"112", TVPlCAL ALL SLOPED ROOFS ROOF CRICKET BUILDING 3 - ROOF PLAN -----------------------0'1 J/J2",r-o- ~ P.U0.137\SUIIMITT ALIS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 02/17/lt:Jn. - A2-3.3 II ■■ · TEMECULA CALIFORNIA c.~t.':.,.~!;,~:;;,. ::::,:'"i"':.:::: KEY PLAN <l>'n"ffll'~mrm:,110C1u·1< ... ......,,,.,,,..,.,,...,:n,,.a.na:..- ... 11D1r.~Bn<:at·~•·nw«•...,..,.,,-.,,..__ .. ,,u.,..u.11A,-., _"l>Q,1 ,..-.;.,,..,_.,. ,.<nr.<,"""'~"-.Y .,...,,,, .,,,u,n~·,u •"1•n~-•,mr·. """~'"'"'<" ·••-"'L fN\IRJt l l(C n :n ,.,, IJIK U (JI W 'L"O OT ; <l l lU.<UMW.IU .CTV"•U m.JC <n c..-;111 ,U.W\I\-N"<" >J.l»"-"'l < .. ((...,,11'1 .<0<> oL I _ ,,TU Cff<!l.~Nl' ru .<.~ ....,.._...,.,,,«lluai:tn,o '"''""""'""'"""- 51) l.719 J l I~ 4,(6(] 8 32.r$ L016 6,0X, 1.0'"..6 1,101 s.sos 6 12 48.Cf.& !,JOI c.a l,JJ2 l)'SS J.SIO IUM 6UILDlN6 4 RfSID, TOTAL 2:>1.m11s 21,SJ> u 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 t=•;:e =t=======!'.=• ======+====•r••===t=====•• ====j=====::'.'.=+==t:::=======••••=======t====••-<"===1:+====•••=• ===1====•=•·••===:::i•, :LJ I :LI G.I.RJ.GfPA.RKINGPIIOl/10(0 EN RYI .·,_;,_-,:-,·, .. _. ·-,_;, .-, '. I '.':_'.,'.;/ .. I GROUND FLOOR PATIO- 150 S.F./DU TYP. 0 0 0 0 @ BUILDING 4 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN -,,-,,--.1·--0------------------------------------------;(D r,\~~llil iil'B~IITT .-\1.0~ ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 02/ll/lOJll -- A2-4.1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA <,:,·:: •• :::.:,::: .• ::::::::::::::: KEY PLAN BUILDING 4 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -,13-,--,r--0-------------------------------------<0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-4.2 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ::•,,·::t::'1:i:::: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING ' -------,, I I I I I I I I KEY PLAN 1 \ '. I r t ,-,,=· --=;r. r., {.\ {.\ {.\ {.\ {.\ {.\ If 111 0 \!!J'. ~ ~ \!!) \!f ~ ~ :: : \;=;:;•-=;~=======::;;;::=======:+==,=::;;·-~-===:+=====:;;:;=====:+=====:;;:;;:".-"":-·===:+========;;========t==::;;~===M::;:;;;;;;;;~;.;;;;::=t====;;=====t"' II I -,I so ' ,rJ I / 'I , t 1 __ I L _ I. 1. :: ,~ :__::iJ~- - I --- -11'::,': ----------_,,;·r-:.-- -----~- -- ----i --- -- -1! r-- I ~ I ; • \ ,,1 ' \ ~ i! I ~b..=... ·, ~ ' ,: .r:::;;:J, , +----,-, -~;-- #- .iw' ~: ll +: \,t( ~ ~ ; ~ - ~ ilti · . ,/' --- --ll- _._ -:=-=~-~ -11 : \ ,.) 1· ...... I '. l; . = jl -- ~ - .- ..... -------- ii -----It-- ~Y- -- ' --l!--- -+-- --i----- -'1- ~ ;,----- ~---- \ - l! ....... ,_ . I I < !j i: J] I / I "'\ ---·ia,r:1:)-f 31✓,,,,.,,.,-1 •• , ••11 ~, ~-,>-,.;.,-,: •• ,-:;:__:_=, ./ 1 ••1 • •• i"-~<-r ='-.-ici. , , 1 ~-i_" '7'~ -Jt- 1E]11- ·-n ~" -ff tu 11-11;3•·:: ,..,__ -11 - . -•• ,1-_ ,.,-"'.:: 11. -tt- 11- ,- -11 ·lit 1EJE1l~. , -I~; i,:: ll ~- • • -, '- I ,_ "" - aT:7'"./ - •• -:._::::::- :_::.;,-:- - - - -1.-.i r .-.r _,.:1/" -...,:: - :"" .. ' ,. - - •· -..... " 1 1 1r··-- ----1 . .r r - --- - --- - r---------- - --, -- -- --- --------------- f-- ---- ::- iw.11 : ½.- ~ aw. ~: t :1 -- l--:/:1 , 1;'\--;- -1:,..____.,.__f_.r- - -- :/:: f IL__ _j · ~ .. lj 1il ~ -: "i l r i~ , i ' ii n't:::'+:,c::-c:---,--1===="!'=== ........... ----+ ++-----+- l=-=- -= L__ -~ ! 1:_i, - ! ] i il__ __ -- l I ~ ---::-'-1 U..:-.:---:-----:;i r.:--=--=--7"--,:."!..l ll -:,.- t---- __ JJ I~--'-=.:--.:-,,-, i-:;::==~.,4==-::;.::i1c-L-- ..... :: . .-:.~--=---t:c :.:::::-.::-.:::.::1, • • ~- -------,>------+------+-> I I I ! 0 0 0 0 0 BUILDING 4 - ROOF PLAN ~.,,,. ROOFPrTCH31J2'J12',TYPICALALLSlOPEOROOFS I -,,--,,---.-- ... 0--·--------------------------------------------~CD ROOF LEGEND; ROOF Tl.ES: 8AIICELONA GARNEl lllLNO FROM801VJ.. RAFTER TAILS O 24" 0. C. TYP. □□□□□· ROOFWAUONOPADS • ROOf MECHANICAL UNIT, TYP. TYP. ROOF SLOPE ROOF CRICKET SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-4.3 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA c.:,•,'::-;:,:::,. ::·•:"i':.:::: KEY PLAN 0 AREA TOT AR EA QTY PER T'l'Pf % S7l 1,719 l 7.1% A-) 710 4,260 6 1.016 9,141 9 1,0>~ 9,495 1101 ll,010 c.1 I C-2 j 1,30 1 1,3!1 3,996 "'' 1.75s 3.sio 1 4),13-l 41 ,.,. ... .., ..... ""4" ..... "'""''"' ,.....,,..,.,L-m,,:\'ffllCU.nc'"..-""'"' .,..,,_...,;r,11.mu...,_·•.:un-,,,,.,i, u.,,,u.u.,.,n.._,..._,.n.........,_,.,.,., ,..,_'Nl .,a<-.CIIJIS<"ll "'1 •!"""""''u1,1>•r.C1 ,u:,i ...... ...,.. •• ,.,,~i,10,..,,,.,,,.,,,,u.u.-.><n ..,.n·.r,.1.,,,:, ,,o:,.,JN>HP -1>JU>JOl'-"""''"'ui.;-,u;,·nn,;u.r ,.,,.,.. ,,.,.,..,..,,-n.._.,u,u;;L-.mr_.:,v :'"u.""'-"'''(,1n:un·,.,a,,,,n,,..,,.._,.,. J\'..,t,u.,.111.n-.MDtv<-~ Am<-r.-m,"""·''-•""...,.~"",c.'n'"' 4lUNln ◄3,Ud S.F. N STALLS I'.·;::·:;: -I GROUND FLOOR PATIO-150 S.F.IDU TYP. ~-0 BUILDING 5 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN -,,-32--.-,---o·---------------------------------------------0 l',\!1>-I FI sum 11n .,1,i;_, ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 02/11/'20ll -- TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A2-5.1 :, W,¢ KEY PLAN ~~~~m!L~---0 ~~~7111:~r=~~~~t:,;;rr'17l~~ ---0 BUILDING 5 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -,,-,,--,1-·-o-- ---------------------------------------10 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A2-5.2 :=..¥ ::::!!::;:::::: MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING KEY PLAN ROOF LEGEND: ROOf'TILE8: 8AA CM NAGAR HEf 8lI.N O FROM 80 1W. RAFTER TAJ LS G 2'" 0. C. TYP. □□□□□· ROOFWALKINGPADS '0 EE3 .. ---- . . I I --- . 0 • ROOF MECHANICAL UNIT, lYP. TVP. ROOF SLOPE / + ROOF CRICKET ··- --- -- -- ! ll ~~i L_ -- ,_} n C < C • ) r--=-~--=-~~ 0 li 11 ._ _ - ~li 1----,--tt--1 I - -i: :r -------- J f ' ' 0 0 I 0 BUILDING 5 _ ROOF PLAN ~m ROOFPITCH31/T/12",TYPICAI.ALLSLOPEDROOFS I -,,-,,- .. - ... -0-------------------------------------------------,(D SO LA N A W IN C H ESTER HILLS PA2G-ll 11Sl18Ml?T AUi 02 /17/2Clll - A2-5.3 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA :::,::"i':.:::: 0-- - ' -0 -0 KEY PLAN l)',j ll TYl'l 8Ufl.O!NG6UN1TMIX ~A·Ll t~"~'' ;;"-+--AH~CA~T=OT~AH!?iEAt:'.QfTVj 1'(11 IY ,-:: .... .. : ,:::~ :, " % 8-2 :::::: ~=: 12.192 12 l9 S&OO. 2°"'28 1.101 '·"" 20 40.0):, c-r c-z Tll-l l B~ • 2 B 1.30J 181!.•18 1,332 U~•UB 1,755 TOTAL o.~ 1,755 I 4),C~H ! 50 I so I L RUILOmG611fSIO. TOTAL: GARAGt PARKING PROVIDED: 43,0U S.f. l 30 SIALLS 1 I'._':':'·:·· 1 GROUND FLOOR PATIO-150 S.F./DU TYP. '~~-1:.DING 6 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN 0 SOLANA WINCHESTER TEMECULA HILLS CALIFORNIA fA~llil Sl'D~ITTT .\.L•! • • ■ OJ/11/Xll l A R t.: ~ ou,u·.,.~< A2-6.1 0 ! 0· '0 I 0,) 0 Ri!'i~'9l-: ,,_ ...,,,_ _ ___:+-t-0 -0 BUILDING 6 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -,,-,,.-,,.-.o--------------------------------------0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-6.2 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA '"'"""'"" ROOF LEGEND : ROO F TI L ES : &A flCt lONA.G.A.A.H ET &Lf HO fROM IOAAL RA.FTERTAILS@24"0.C. TYP. □□□□□ ROOFWA!J(]NGPADS ■ ROOF MECHANCCAI.. UNIT, TYP. TYP. ROOF SlOPE ROOFCRICl<ET 0 0 0 I 0 -0 • ! -0 0 ·, __ ~. 0 -,;,,,r---=--=-=-=--=- =--=-,anll ----'•'+--+-0 ",:=--=--=- =--=--=--b,-=-=--=--=--d, --i,i -- - i i ! l i ~ ;--- -If --7 ! ' 1----1- ~-- ' __ : - -- -0 -- -- - - -r - - -- - - - - -1 i I I 11 I i I b i .0 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING BUILDING 6 - ROOF PLAN ~.~ ROOfPITCH31/T/12",TYPICALALLSlOPEOROOFS I -,1-,,- ... -,---0-------------...aa=============="------------------CD PA»ll71SU8MITTAUS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-6.3 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ~ , ., . :::,,1::::m-:::: KEY PLAN AREA TOTARU. QTY PERTVP£ % 1.719 3 11"' 710 6.390 1,016 !.OSS 1,101 esce l,301 1,312 7,991 6 TOTAL bl,909 26 26UrilfS N ,909 Sf. I'. <.:.::· ... 1 GROUND FLOOR PATIO - 150 S.F.IDU TYP. tn1r,.u_, ... ...,..,.,<L ,a,r .. a,.,,,,,.,,,., nrnn.1otw;....,..,,,....,.._, c-.o,<S"oonn,....IMw._, ou,m u:.it.,. ,,....,,. "n<'lh:• >l>IW>-Tl."-<l."'Ol>"'-<1.1 MWE, ..,.'N\,. '"'"'"""""'""'' ... '""'"ull><rll#b-"<l·•-~·--·"'". ~L''l>lUwo<,m•1">T""n· .... -, .. ,. _,_,..,........,,..-,.._n-nn,a,:Pr•'Dl>.11.,-.,,,.,.a .. ,..,..- "'-"""'.,.,."-ni>-..,,:,,L"""~..,.........,_"o,11«n.,.-,,.,. ... .,,""", ~..,,.,. __ _....,,1._.,._,,,,..,_.n,,n'loba,..,,,.- •..un -.r ,-...,,•,c,1111u..,.. ... 1N< BUILDING 7 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN -,,-,,-.,- ... -0·--------------------------------------------~0 ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS r»f11j'JD'12 --- A2-7.1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ::::::::;:::::: KEY PLAN 0- 0 0 I 0 0 BUILDING 7 - SECOND AND THIRD FLOOR PLAN -31,-,-.-.r--o------------------------------------10) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS l'AW•ll'l:'iUl~llTT .11,•~ 00./11/2022 - A2-7.2 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ,.:.-::.::.:,::: .. ::'.:::::::::::: R OOF LE GENO : R OOF T L E S : IWIW ONAGA.RNETBlINO fROMBOW RAFTER TAILS024' 0. C. TYP. □□□□□ ROOF WALKING PADS • ROOF MECHANICAL UNIT, TYP. TYP. ROOF SLOPE ROOF CRICKET 0- ------·--,---- KEY PLAN 0 ,r-- ------- I---<>--<~ - l •. L_ i ' MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING I ~ .... R00fPITCH3112"/12",TYl'K:ALALLSLOPEOROOf S I BUILDING 7 - ROOF PLAN -,,-,,--.-1·-0-----------------------------------------------CD SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A2-7.3 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA c .. ••• ..... ""''• r::,,m::~i.:::: n 1~t ~CJ wn ~ BLDG. 8 ITT] Lb KEY PLAN 1:•>:.·: .. J GROUND FLOOR PATIO - 150 S.F./DU TYP. BUILDING 8 - FIR ""'" 0 • ST FLOOR PLAN SO L A N A W IN C H TEMECULA E S T E R H IL L S CALIFORNIA rA.~!311 SL1l ~IJTT AL•5 • • ■ 02/17/2022 A R i,: rr-- .,c • .,,c,,,~~ A2-8.1 ,,. BLDG.8 [Rl KEY PLAN BUILDING 8 - SECO 31 32 ·,,.o· ND AND THIRD FLO OR PLAN 0 SOLANA WIN CHEST TEMECULA ER HILLS CALIFORNIA A2-8.2 Ill D Im A R J.; "<■,nu,.,~• ROOF LEOfN0: ROOF TILES : 8AllalONA GAANET Bl.ENO FROMIOAAJ. RAFTERTAJL9Q24'0.C. TYP. ROOF WALKING PADS • ROOF MECHN,IICAL UNIT, TYP. TYP. ROOF SLOPE ROOFCRlCl<ET 0--- li ii t !::::;:==cc-::c-:-::-----c::=:=== ---- ----,:''I Ill '11: 1,·:,i- --------- it - --,---~ -I ~ ::---- --------------: ~1 I ,\ I ii I I I ..ia ...Ji1--~~'--:::----:•~'r--;-·;----1il~ • I a , 7 ' I iJ I! i 'l 11 r !• l Ii : '._ --------------- t. __j KEY PLAN 0- 0 i! !i' ,, \ ~---- i1 , -0 -....I --- -- - - 7 0 I -------~-- -·------. l ~ 83, / - /~ / / / . 0 ..,,_,~1w ROOFPfTCH31.IT/12", TYPICALAI.LSLOPEOROO ~ ~t 0 , ____, ,_ I ,.1 f1111CAL.~IW>~tl0 CW YYf'I MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SCREENING BUILDING 8 - ROOF PLAN -,,-,, .... -~'-._.-.-------------------------------------------0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS PA.20-ll71SUBMJTJAL#S 02/11/'1021 - A2-8.3 II ■ ■ TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ,,,,' T O T A L B U IL D IN G A R E A 1 1 ,2 4 5 sJ. POOL DECK AND COMMUNITY OUTDOOR SPACE RE: LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS ,/ CLUBHOUSE FLOOR PLAN _______________________ (1'\ 118"•1'-0 " ~ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA «J./11/2!Xl.2 - A2-9.1 <,:,·:,· •• ::: •. ~::: .. ::;:::::::::::: PlA T £H£IGl<T DIA - e r-1" IIESTIIOOMS E> IO"ol"~~~/ 0 11"•1"811 0:ZliWA,YS E> 11'•1" w.lLIIOOM e 13'•l" ~:~?ii~a G) u-r e, .. -.,· ,--- : rr===========;r"""!,-'--s:-,---i--------:1 I I ', I I ' I , I : !• I I I "! I .... I --~-··-~· .... • • • ~' .,,. ROOF PITCH 3 112" 112". TYPICAL ALL SLOPED ROOFS '· r----------------------- 1 ' I ' :.:: ...... , ... , ENLARGED MECHANICAL WELL ROOF TRELLIS ROOF TILES: BARCELONA GARNET BLEND FROM BORAL _..,;, .. , .... CLUBHOUSE ROOF PLAN -----------------------'1' 1/8"•1'-0" ~ /~--: -~- ;\i ,,1\'' l'A~<>-1171 $lJD ~DTT .\lAI II II Ii SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEM E CU L A CA LI FO RN IA A2-9.2 ::: m::::::::: MAINTENANCE ELEVATION C EJTERIOJICEl,IENT PlASTER-S/JOOHi FINISH SW?\M l'MITEFLOUR MAINTENANCE ELEVATION B ! :=i c:- I I t • : w-r MAINTENANCE BUILDING ROOF PLAN PROPOSED COLOJVMA n~RIAL SCI n:ME I· j rco11cA.ETEROOF V ~b~~ROOF ✓i <ii· ! 4 BIN TRASH ENCLOSURE ROOF PLAN MAINTENANCE ELEVATION A ~~-::-..-=~0 -- 7 ----····-·· - ~-- r I\ /l 1 I \ t I I \ 1 I I \ / I 0 I \ / I \ I I \ / I L----~-----_J 0. 0·--- MAINTENANCE BUILDING FLOOR PLAN <,!WOOOf"5GIABEY0N0 CIIOSSl,OEM&EIISTO PREVEIITDICl0SUIIE ACCEJ;SN<DlA."-910V"P1113 -1-f"'"'====="""" OTER!ORCE"1EIITPl.O.ST(I! 1STUCC01fPIISH TA.~5>1 EH~lOSUREWALLIYPICAl ll~Nl~:::i~~';~ti:S~1t -'-L:···•···--····•·• ~801.TANCHOR HOI.ESTOSErnRE (I.O.!f,f'l'P, ,cu arc\'AA D WAST£B,1 ~,. CotlCRETEROOl'flLE 8.\ACE:LON.A.G,t.llNETBLENO fR0!.IBORAI. EXl ER IOA CEN ENI PV.&TER-SIIOOH< n,..91 S'11710: ~TEFLOUFt ~~~NTENANCE BUILDING® ~--~-~-::... __ -\/\._ 4 BIN TRASH ENCLOSURE PLAN - ALT. ACCESS 4 BIN TRASH E""11,N.=aa,Cno1-o- L=O=S=U=R=E=====e)- ·- SOU0IHJOFC0\IEIIIN:l- C0H:RETEIIOOl' IILE ,-,swooo,"5CIABEYOND CIIOSSMO.t!lfllSlO PREVENTENClOSURE ACCE6SANOTRAS><OUMPIN3 CONCR!:TEW,•.UOP.TYP O'"TEJIIORCENEITTP\.A6TEA. _L..J__;;;•-a·-•••· EN~t':~~E ~:i.11r::~ R~~~:T~Clii~s~J, J.IIOlTl<NCIIOII HDI.HTUSECURE (.,<,JE,TVP. ----,....;;1,.-0- EXTERIOACWOIT 1'1.,0.SJERfl!~SH ,cuBICYAAD lf-l--'-:::_-Fr'!l'r-T7TVP.wt°'1}a~~~-1-xs·-r SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA <n/>'1Nn - A2-10 CARPORT CROSS SECTION L_ --/f---------- CARPORT ELEVATION CAAPOIUCOll!~IIS\!Pl'~l IOBELOC ... TEDO\JTSIDEOF HIEl'Xll"CLEAAP.t,qK11mst,-u,n1>1L.>L"1.LCAA~T ____ -, --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- ---------------------------------- 9' X 18" CLEAR PARKING STALL TYP. ALL CARPORTS CARPORT FLOOR PLAN ,,,,T='=Y'=P.,,,IC.,,,A,,.,L,,,,C..,A""'R""'P"='O..,R"'T"'===-='=1,.,,,o""p'=A""R""K"'IN,.,G""""'S='=Tf=!A,.,,LL..,,S"="'M"=A"=X"'===========lfo1' 114•,,1·-0· v SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A2-11 '""'"'""" 1 5 0 S .F . E N L A R G E D B A L C O N Y 2 N D F L O O R U N I T S d BLOG 2, 3, <I ANO 7 PRIVAT[ oPlN SPACl ON UPPUlflOOfl 8-UCON1lS llSO U.OFGROUNDHOORPATIOATflRSTJ'lOONUNrTSNOTINClUOIOINllllilA8U) u,m Ml(ONYAR[A TOlo\lMLCONVARfh ,. 5-l 180 10 "" .. , ~-1 4£1 2.496 ~2 !16 3~.4J.i r-;,;--r.;:-':,-t---:.,,'.:1·---·7ioo -52 ~- --· S.00 re :=:,1.,=µ::~::=====~~,::=====::.::,.~ ... i::r.::;.:c-,_7_...,ll::_~t!L 0 - 11.8 30 1 il-ll£o}t,IYTOTAlS AV(~G( 11/1.U:O~ ARt.., PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AT UPPER FLOOR BALCONIES D UV!NG ' ~ SLEEPING DINING LIVING ~ ~ BEDROOM 1r-,oit LIVING DINING D S -1 573 S .F. Q A-1 672 S.F. Q A-2 710 S.F. Q T Y P IC A L UN IT P LA N S -v-,·-,,- .. 0--------------------------------------------,(D AREA IOtA~LA QTY rE:tl'f'PE ,,_ sn 4.nu 1 l,016 21!.4-18 i.css : f..MD l,10! '"" 1.ns 7.3.00I 1'l l'A~l).ll'I Sl!B~f!H .-\LOS ■■Ill SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A3-1 PRIV ... Tt OPEN SPAU OH UPPlR ncoe !IAlCONllS 1150 s.r. Of GROUND HOOII PATIO-' l flRST HOOII. UNIT$ NOl lNClUDlD IN nits TA81[ TYPE 6ALCON'fll.R{A lOlAl~lCOt1Y-'R£4 QT't " "" 110 ID w, " " PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AT UPPER FLOOR BALCONIES BEDROOM LIVING DINING ,, 1,,· ![] l_ _ BEDROOM .. ~ BEDROOM MASTER LIVING BEDROOM ] ' _I_ CLOSE' ,-\. • t----~--+--tl , .... ,,, ..... B-1 1,016 s.f.o B-2 1,055 s.f. O B-3 1,101 s.f. O TYPICAL UNIT PLANS -v-,--,,-._-o•------------------------------------------0 ,.DAPf,.lltUNITMIIC CHAPTtR1lA ,., ... S7J 4.011 7 1,016 28.4'8 ?8 i.oss SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ('Qfl1/ro'El - ■■■ A3-2 '"""''""" 1150 5.F. OF GROUND fl.OOII PATIO AT flRSTflOOft U/IIJTS NOT INClUOlO IN TtHS TA81.E BAICONV AIU.\ lOTAl 9ALCONV AR[A orv " ,., ,., l,100 6-1 ,00 " BEDROOM BEDROOM C fl======> "' 12.830 BAtCO~YTOTAlS ,WtllAGC/IA.LCONY,\RCA PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AT UPPER FLOOR BALCONIES BEDROOM BEDROOM LIVING "' CLOSET : : " it LL -, C-1 1,301 s.f.o C-2 1,332 S.F. Q TYPICAL UNIT PLANS -,,-,.-.,- .. 0--------------------------------------------<0 •.Oil 7 7 l,Olf. 28..'"8 28 1.101 ,.., . 1.)()1 ,.,, 7.9-J2 l.7~5 J.75~ TOT4l 7J,,«A R SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A3-3 ::, j/if, ••• '"""'"·"" tore }!\-U!I 18 - PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AT UPPER FLOOR BALCONIES Pl'tlVATt OPEN ~PAC£ ON UPPUI FlOOR8AlCONIU 15,05.l,OFGROUNDHOORPATIOATllRST FI.OOA UNITTNOTJNCLUDll!.!~IS~ UNIT r'YPI 9AICONtAR(A TOIM8AlCONVM[f. arr PlRTVi>l ~ SI 18! UJO HI "" ' A 2 11~,,et 3,100 r.J 20'-10" 20'-2" ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' / / / / / / / / / / / 2o·x20· MIN. CLEAR DIMENSIONS GARAGE -r -I BEDROOM I. ~ ~ ' " .. ;;-";t•◄___:_ .. 20'-10" 10'-9" ~:·,,,\., __ oo KITCHEN 0,U Q DINING 16'-4" LIVING '-,-----J>f- ='''= 11'-7' BEDROOM L ::: : ~LOSEl Li~- TH-1 1ST LEVEL 313 S.F. 0 TH-1 2ND LEVEL 721 S.F. 0 TH-1 3RD LEVEL 721 S.F. 0 TYPICAL UNIT PLANS TH-1 TOTAL: 1,755 S.F. C) ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA 02/17/1.0'll. - A3-4 '"""'"'"" ~--- OE:OR,'iTfl!'EIRONNEOAI.UOU ~---1"1ERSECTIIIGG-t.i>I.EROOf ~--- RAfTBIIAll WO.C.T ... P. EJITERIORCE'-'<.NTPL\STE!l'M"O< 1~~&,,JlOfl .. SH.TVP. WDING\'ll'fV1."''''[»\\'5\0,1TII MULUOffi IJ£f.o.LBlo.LCOl-l't' R .. 11.IIGTYP. BUILDING 1 EAST ELEVATION -"-,,-.,-,·-.o---------------------------------------------------------1@ l,l,IDIN$Yl""LWINOOW!.IO.,T>t MVIUONS ~---CONCl!lcTE0 !'rS><AP£ROOfTllE PROPOSED COLOR/MATERJAL SCHEME WH!l~fl.OllR --- BUILDING 1 NORTH ELEVATION ,-,-,,- .• -,..-0-· -----------------------------------------~® ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ou,112an --- A4 -1.1 ~ ;:'.::::::::::;: """'--"'<!! ~--- RNT£111...,l,1•·0.C.TYP. EXTEIIIOftCE!,#EIHP\.ASTEll'MTH t ... :?:IW.DFWllSl<TYP. EflEIIIORCE~TPlASTERWITli 16-:ol6,_'<Dfllll!.H.IYP. IJEf.ll.8.\J.C0UVflTERIORCBA£1HPU5TEll'NITM IIAA.11/G.TW >6-Xl&ANDfPl1SH.IYP. JIWI I I I BUILDING 1 WEST ELEVATION -3/-,-,.-.,- .. 0-------------------------------------------------------"'® SIIDINGW~l\\',\NO:JWSV.'!TH MlllllOliS COIICIIETE"S-Sli,\,l>EIIODfnLE ---~ PROPOSED COLOR/M ATERIAL SCHEME ¥11111ffUllll _,_ BUILDING 1 SOUTH ELEVATION -J/-,-,.-_,- .. 0---------------------------------------------------i@) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA m/11/1.an - A4-1.2 ••• "'"'"'''"" MIDINGW0\."1NOO"'S"./TH M\AUON!. EXTEIIIOIICEl.<ENTl'LA.SIElll\1TH •5-l'OSN<OflNISt<.TYP. 0:TEAl:JIICOEllTPV<:.lEJl.l\11H 15-:!0SNIOrn,S>l,TYP. ~---COIKR£TE 'S"-FIOOflllE llECOIU<TTVEIRONliEIW.UO,'/ ~----IIEIISEC.TINGG.t.OlEROOf' BUILDING 2 NORTH EAST ELEVATION -----------------------------@)s 3/32">1'-0" EXlE'IIOIIC.E!oll:m~TElll',\lH 1 .. :.'05""10flNISH.TYf'. SUQNGWffi.\1.1,;00WSWII~ I.A\AUONS £)(1£!IIOIICEl.lEIHPl.l,&TEJl\\flH 11;-:,os....mr111s11.nP. ~--- CaN:~fl£"S"5;iAl'ERODFlll,.E PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME ~e.-- {IIN'Tl!IITNUII•- ~= ~- ""'""" --~ ~---DECORATTl"EIRONIJ.EDH.LION BUILDING 2 NORTH WEST ELEVATION -,,-,-,.-.,.-.0-----------------------------------------------------<0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA !Z2/II/Ml1 - A4-2.1 ••• :::,.::i::'l!::::: W OI N !;\,t1 'fl.\\\N DO W$W IT1' M U W O N > EX'TU!:IORCEl,IEll'Tl'\"5'1[111\'~Tl< 11i,,:!OS.0.~0O11&>1,T'IP, EXTERIORCE>,IEHTPU.SIER\\1TH lli,,:CSANDfl••SH JYP, l.!El"1.aAI.CCHV ll"Jtll<<IT'>'P. BUILDING 2 SOUTH WEST ELEVATION -----------------------@o J/32",1',0" o,m, .. ~.l"O.C.TYP.--- 'IUDNG\llm.\',lNDOWS\',1IH MVUJOtlS o,El .... 11.\1.COU\' ll"JUN(I.JYI'. ElCIERIORCEI.IEHTl'l"5IER™lH 1i,,:Nlso.l10fll.l:>l.'TYP. EX'fEIIIOIICUIENTPLA$TEll .... lH li,,:OS"1<0fllllSM,TVP. COO'.:'IETE'G'~ROOFTilE--- ■ PROPOSED COLOR/MATERJAL SCHEME W£1,\I.Uilol[Nlli l""l,HG/AOO-,i. BUILDING 2 SOUTH EAST ELEVATION -3/-,,-.,,-,,0-.--------------------------------------@) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS r,u,:ncm - A4-2,2 TEMECULA CALI FORNIA EXT [ll l:,R C [l.l[IH P\J,t,T E Jl \\11 H li-~S,O.N D F INI S>f .lYP . PRO POSED COLOR/M ATERIAL SCHEM E WDOoB.D.IE .. "TII (RAl'T!;RTAll.6/FMDI ME"l""-UDIENlll ~F= fMUIO/N)OlfllON). >UD;NGVINn \\IN!IOWSl'/ITH MUlU:lt-lS BUILDING 3 NORTH EAST ELEVATION -3/-,,-.,1-•.0---------------------------------------------® EXfEJ11()11(:£1,1£HlPLAST£RY.11H 1(;-JCSAIIOFIIISII.IVP. 0:1£1UDRCE~!ftPlA'iTERl'.ITl1 16-?QSAll!IFll~S><. nl>. NET~8AlCONY 11"41N31VP. SUDIHG\1H'1.WINDO\\'!,\YITl1 MULUONS BUILDING 3 NORTH WEST ELEVATION -3/-,,-.,-,..o---------------------------------------------0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A4-3.1 TEM ECU LA CA LIFO RN IA OTEJIIOIICE"'i:IITP\"61ER\\f™ 1fi,.JO&AIWF1"11MIT'fP. PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME MET/.le>.tcorl'1' !Wll!<G fi"P. 1/(11.Tl(AI\VHl/Oi~W,m .... oecws ~u°'UJ~~- WINOO\\'S\Yml BUILDING 3 SOUTH WEST ELEVATION @ ---------------------------0 3132•,1·-o· OIOUOllt:ENEIITPI./.STERv.lTH lfi,.?'l6A."<0fl!HSH..TYP. SLIOING\\NltWNOO,,,"SWlll< MUlU~> =1tETE•5•5>1.oJ>EIIOOFlllE Vl'IITICAHYHI.ING\UM.v.lNUCl\\'!o 0.TE.111.:lllc.E>.IENTPI.A.SIElll',\TH ur:-JS'-'IOFI/ISH.TVP. BUILDING 3 SOUTH EAST ELEVATION -,-1,-,.-,,- .. 0--------------------------------------------------------® SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA Q2/l11"2(JJ2 - A4-3.2 ••• PROPOSED COLOR/M ATERIAL SCHEM E E>:lEfll.>ll CE.IENTPLASfa\\.JIH !&.10....:iDr~UK, l~P. \'iM<!FbKSW710,I 81'1'11lll WHIJl':,LOUII ~E-NVilUI,_ s -···--·J WIIINGVINVl,\',1NO:JWS\l,'TTH MUlUONS BUILDING 4 NORTH EAST ELEVATION -J/-,-,.-.,--.0-------------------------------------------------------® SlJl.'l?tOW(I\WINOO'MJ\',\lH MUIUOm l:XTl;Rl.'.>llca,EIITPV,SfEIIV.11H 1&.:G&-1.N"DfltJl&tl.TYP. E.(l'E'IIORCE~TPl,..-.Slffi\".tltl 1S-l'OSA.",Of1!HSH.T'rP COUCRETE"S"&l1.oJ>EIIOOflllf BUILDING 4 NORTH WEST ELEVATION -----------------------fA\ J/32"•1'·0" \J 'ffi,._..1Jit SllB\UTT .\J.•~ ••• A It K SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TE M E CU L A CALI FO RNIA 02/11/,IW? ...-- A4-4.1 '"'""'"'"' C O H CII ET E "t.•SH APE II OOF TII.E --~ RAFtt11,..._,~•·o.r.nP. IJE'T"l&AlCONY IINLN<.1."'P. PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME EXTEl!IORCE...Unn.A&IERWITll 1~l')S#l0flllSH,nP. SUD!liG\iffl'l\\lNOOl~l~\,111< MULU-'.>NS BUILDING 4 SOUTH WEST ELEVATION --------------------------------ifiJI 3132",1'-0" '\!:!._) N!Efl&ECINOGJJII..Ell.>Qf --~ D:fERIOIICCt.lEHlPLUIEIIY,IIM 16-.0t."ll0flll$H nP. SUOt~Vl""11.WINOOWSV.llH COHCIIETE"S't.fWl:IIOOFTltE MUtllOII!, "ETAl8""CONY 11>,UUO.TYP. E.'(TflllOltCEIJENlPlASll:IIY,ITt1 ri..l'OSNIOflt.SttTYP. BUILDING 4 SOUTH EAST ELEVATION -3/-,,-.,,- .. o-- ----------------------------------------@) ~: ':': SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A4-4.2 ~ ;:;:::::::::::: ~ CONCRETE"S"S>IIIPl:R:x>FT-.f---~ RAHEJITNL.2•·0.c.n-P.---- 0,TERIORCE ... EUTPI.ASTEll\\4TM 1J-10SAHOFINIS>l,r,P. INTER6ECn.~Cl(lA8U\ROOf CONCJIElfT$HI.PEl100FTl.f ---~ J"R£Cl!SAT\1'1l'L\WIOOW.fYP SUOINUV\t;V\\\\NOOW!i\\1TM EXTEJIIORCE1JfNTPLOStfR\\ITH 15-:GSNlOflllSH.TYl'. BUILDING 5 EAST ELEVATION -,,-,-,.-,,- .. 0--------------------------------------------------------® EXTERIDIICEMENTPI..ASTE:Rl'.111< 15-;>G!.NIOfUISHTYP. ~--- COUCRElE"S-r.tt.APEROOfTl\E £•1[1!1<)11 Cfli!Elll Pt.ASTEJll\1Tl1 \5-10s,\',/Dfl'll5>t.f't'P PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME -a- (RU"lDITAIUltf"- ='= _,XIUlfNillO:O 9W711)2 -- --- BUILDING 5 NORTH ELEVATION -J/-,-,.-.,-.,0---------------------------------------------------® 0) ••• ,\ II. ~ SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA 02/11/10'2 ---- A4-5.1 EX T E!l lOR C E I.IEtl T P<.A &T E R \\ITH 16>:10 s.v<O f llll r.i<.TYP . SU OI N S Vltl"f l "-1"DO -.•:S \>.\TH •=• E)(TERIOACENENTPI..ASTERY.Ht< 16-lO&il,l!Of!t.lSHftP. BUILDING 5 WEST ELEVATION -----------------------------ro' 3132·,1·.o· '\.!:!_) EYIEJIK>IICIEl.lENTPl.ASlER\1,111< it,.X,S,.,,OfJ/ISt<.TVP. ,---- COHCl;£TE"f;"S>l.<P£R.:x,f'aE EX'IEJll,:>IICEl.oEl/lPl,A6lERl'.11H 16-JJSANOfl!<ISH.TYP. r L PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME WOOOtl.OH:>ria ~TNU11•...u. ~= BUILDING 5 SOUTH ELEVATION -,,-,-,--.,-·-0---------------------------------------------------@) ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A4-5.2 El<T OI IOP C EI A£N I Pl ,t,,S l £R V.lf H , .. :o &~O f 1!•~.f't l'. ~--- COI IC R [T£"&'5'<Al'E R OOf ll l£ !.m.'I N ,!;VI N"I.V.lN DO\y,;V.,TH M Vl UO HS £)1 1 E R IO II C EN E N T PlA S T E R \",IT H , .. 1(1 5,',,N O fP II SH I Y P . ~--- c o 1..:R ET E "s;SMAPE 11 oo f n L E BUILDING 6 EAST ELEVATION -----------------------®s J/32",1'-0" t.11:1"1.SALCONY RMl,.0.TYP. 0.TERIORCOIENTPLMIER\"1TH , .. :ws-.,mH.,SH..fl'P. CONtllElE"5"SHAPER~~I/E-W----~ £(1EJIIORC[I.IEtHPl.,\ST[IIV.11H , .. JoVl'IOffNISH,TYP. PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME BUILDING 6 NORTH ELEVATION -3/-,-,.-.,-- .• -.----------------------------------------------------0 rA1(~1lH SllD~IlTT .\L•.• ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA Q2/U/:z011 - A4-6.1 !.UOU«.\11.-v1.v.1t1oa.11sv.m, MUlllONS EXTVUURl"EMENlPlASTER'MTJ< , .. !Qt;J,tlOf~ISH.T'>l'. i;ON;.i!Elf."!..t>l.\PEIIOOFTllE---- 2"1UCfSSAl\11N'l'IW,NDOW.lY". DIEll:1011 CEIIEtH PiASIEfl ~.ITH li,,:0SNlOfltll~.TVP. BUILDING 6 WEST ELEVATION -31-32---.,.-_,-.-------------------------------------------------------1@) CONCIIE'TE"S'6W.PEIIOOf'U.E---- EXTEIIIORCEKN1PU,51'£l'l\\1lH 1&-:'?6>J<Ofll<ISH,TVJ>. 11"11£.lilT~L~•·o.c.nP.---~ METAl.8Al.COHY 11.,UIIG.T"IP. COll.:11:ETE"S'S>!.lPEAOOFTLE ---- J"lltUSSil\1ml\'AIJO:IW.lY" EXT'EIIIURCEMENIPU,5TEA"'4Tk li,,::lt;J,tlOfUtlSH,T\l'. Sl!OWIGY\H'II.V.1NOOWS',\111,i Ml.ILL.IONS -- - -t----------- PROPOSED COLOR/M ATERIAL SCHEME \'tllflCAllHIIJJiG\llfYllo\111DOWS OECOll"ll,,'f.l'ION ?019-IElf BUILDING 6 SOUTH ELEVATION -31-3-,--,,-.,0-----------------------------------------------------s@) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ■■D f11/11/'1JJ'l2 -- A4-6.2 ~::•.:::::::::::: ~ OdET"I.IALCONV RM.ING, f~P. EXTERIOIIC~MF.:IITl'\.ASTER\',lTlf 16-1"S"1lOfMStl TYJ'. D.lEJIIOA.CE"'EIITPI.ASlER'Ml>I hi•lDSANOFINl!Pl,Tl-P. BUILDING 7 EAST ELEVATION -,,-,-,.-.,.-_,-.-----------------------------------------------------® iiET"l.a.'-1.COlff IUA.lllio.TYP. llllERSECTNOG.UI.EROQJ ElCTEJll.:lllCE!,l(IITPI.ASl£RI\ITH !6-:06"1l0F~-.TYP. PROPOSED COLOR/MATERJAL SCHEME \Yhl<i fio..SW110'2 -"~ wttrl fflOUII 8ttf.RWINWUWl.9 411.CHEOtTUCCOCOlU!INPOR;:H SUOll'IG~111l\\',\N00'A~\\1TN "-' BUILDING 7 NORTH ELEVATION -3/-,-,.-.,-._,-.-------------------------------------------------10 l',\~~1371 SL'B~OTI.\LloS ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A4 -7.1 ~"R ECH ',A T W ./V l V.~N OO W , m. META.L&A.LCOffY R.•J!..111;;,TYP, ElCTBIIORCEMEIITPI.ASTER\\llH 16";:{ls.\NOf~l~.TYI>. C0tlCRETE"6•SHAJIEIIOOFlllE ~ITE!lSECIIJIGGABI.EROOF n"TERIOOICE...rITTl'lASIEA"'ll'H 1&-1JSM0011$H.1YP. BUILDING 7 WEST ELEVATION -3/-,-,.-,,- ..• -.-----------------------------------------------------® UIE'IIOOICEr.EtlTl'l..s!ER .... ITH 111 .. :"JSOJ.IO ~fllSH, TYP, IIETA.L8MCOIIY A"lllN~.TYP, INTERSEC-1\'IQGMII.EAOQF PR O PO SED CO LO R/M AT ER IA L SC HEM E WW.flruSW1102 ~"~ Wtfl ffl(l)Jt --- .,,,,, -WI.Lw.11 ~!~~Nn IV,NOO' ... 'Sl\1'1-l ""'CHEOSTVCCOCOWMI< PQIIICH OECOIIATIV'EIROll"'EOAlllON---~ BUILDING 7 SOUTH ELEVATION -,1-,-,.-.,.- .• -.------------------------------------------------<@) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS T EMECULA CALIFORNIA ••• A4-7.2 ~ ::·.:::::::::::: ~ EXT E R IOR C E M EII T PI.AS TEll \\11H 1~:!0 &Al •D Fl "-'I SH ,TV I'_ ~--- C O N Cll El E "S'Stl ,t.P£R ~;R~~:SS A T \I\NYL l'.ltl OO W .TW . ~H EII SE C Tll 4G U ""81.E R 0 [l f SU [)l t,/.;\1 ...... LIW <OO W S V.1T ll M U LLI ON S E X lEf!IO R t,'i lA EI H PI.A 5 lE R 111T ll >&-Y.I S ..,JD F IN IS H .TV I'. ~---CONCIIETE"S'SI-I.APl:IIOOFl"-E "'ETIJ.B>I.COIIY 11/JllNG TYi'. DECORATI\IEIIIOHr.<E0>.1.llON---~ BUILDING 8 EAST ELEVATION -3/-,-,--,1---0------------------------------------------------------~® COHCRETE"S'SH.lt\PERDOf"TlLE---- - E'(fEf!IORCE!AEtilPL,,STERl'.1TH 1&-l'O $.0.NO Flt~SH. TYP ltlTEl'ISEClMIOG.l&EROOF CONCR!'TE"S"SHAPEROOFn.E ---~ 2"1<fCIS5,ATV,W'l\\',1NOOIV.TYP. EX.IERIORCE"'EU!Pl-'&IER\•,\rn 1S-?~SA110f1NISH, TVP. ~\IDING\lllffll'.1NOOWS1'.1W PR O PO SE D C O L O R/M A T E R IA L SC H E M E ~"~ Wl"l/lfFUlUR 90\t'.lfWINWIIU,<,l,IS ''"" --WI.I.- BUILDING 8 NORTH ELEVATION -31-,-,.-.,--.0---------------------------------------------------<® SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEM ECULA CALIFORNIA ■ • Ii 02/17/2011 - A4-8.1 ~ J:; ::::: ::: ;::: ~ !>l lllltl G ~ltfV LWI N OO W :!i 'M TI< -,,, E)(fEJtl:>RCEl,IEIITPLASTER .... nH 15-l'OSAN0F,mlH,lYI>. Mf.TAl.11.t.1.COHY R"IUUGTl-P. COHCfOETE•C-SIVPfROOFTllE---~ 2' AECl-SS~T\1Nl1."\NOOW. 01>. EXTERIOIICEMEU1PI..Ml[R\\11H 15"~&.l.~DflNISH.TW. BUILDING 8 WEST ELEVATION -31-,-,.-.,- .. 0-------------------------------------------------------® O1£,lllQRl;O.IENTPL'-!.IER\\ITH >5-Xls.<J•Drlt•SH.TYP. CQNCRETE"$""~Aoo:::l.-f.-,-,_--~ EXTERIORCE.'°"!ITPI.Atil(JI\IITH IS-215.<l<0flNISH.TYP. PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME BUILDING 8 SOUTH ELEVATION ,-,-,,-.,-,.--o--------------------------------------------------1@) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA A4-8.2 ••• ~"'"',,,,.'"""' ::;::::::::;::: COHCRETE •s-SIWEROOFlli.E ---~ EXTERIORCENENTPLAST'Elll'~IH 16-206'.IIOFINISH.TVP. R>J'TERT.'Jc.2•·u.c.TYP.---~ CLUBHOUSE EAST ELEVATION -J/-,-,.-,,- .. 0--------------------------------------------------------,® PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME Wtoiofk:U'SW1\02 l!IW7102 -~ --- &:JrTERIORC&:NENTP!)\5T£RV.1TH 16-20&.lNCFlfllSH,TYI'. CLUBHOUSE NORTH ELEVATION -,,-,-,.-,,.-.0------------------------------------------------------~0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 02/!l/2fn2 -- A4-9.1 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA C ON CR ET E T SH 'J'E R OO F TIL E ---~ R -'I I EII I Ml.:t •O .C.TVP .---~ E XTEII IOII C E I.IE N 1 Pl."5 1 Ell 'M TM 11-la~OrlNISH,T'l'P. CLUBHOUSE WEST ELEVATION -------------------------1@0 3132·,,·.o~ PROPOSED COLOR/MATERIAL SCHEME E)(IEJIIOIIC£>.1£N1Pv\SIER\'.41ll 16-706.al.NOflUlliH.l'l"P. COIICRETE'S""SHJ.PERl>Oft._E ---~ DTEll~CEI.IENTPl.<SIERV.tH< 16-l'OS ... lOfl!Ultf'l"P. RIJ'!Elltilll..1'"0.C.TYP.---~ R-'FT£Rr,o,ll .. 21°0.C,TVP. ---~ CLUBHOUSE SOUTH ELEVATION -3/-,-,.-.,.-.,----------------------------------------------------------<@) ••• SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA 02/'1/W11 - A4-9.2 '"'"""'"" i KEY PLAN BUILDING 1 SECTION -,,-,,--,,.- .. -------------------------------------12) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ■■■ A5-1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA '"'"""'"" KEY PLAN 0 f 0 I i 0 I 0 I I I 0 BUILDING 2 SECTION -31-,,--,1'--0_-------------------------------------0) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A5-2 TEM ECULA CALI FORNIA KEY PLAN 0 b __ .. .._,..,. BUILDING 3 SECTION -,1,-,--,1•.-0-------------------------------------~CD SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 02/17/?0U - AS-3 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ;:'. m::::i:::: KEY PLAN 0 BUILDING 4 SECTION -3/-,,-.,,.-.o-· ---------------------------------------0) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS f11 /11n<n:1 - A5-4 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA ::: 001:iin:l :::: KEY PLAN f BUILDING 5 SECTION ------------------------------------------;1 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA 1i,/n/= - A5-5 ~ ::::::::::::::: --...4lW /'? ~~!1) BLDG. 6 KEY PLAN T BUILDING 6 SECTION -------------------------------------------1 I -.._.• :)lJ:_l•·,1•.Q" SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS A5-6 ■■■ TEMECULA CALIFORNIA KEY PLAN 0 BUILDING 7 SECTION --------------------------;!11 313 r .1 ·-o · \.:._) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS fT,/./11/Nll - A5-7 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA BLDG. 8 KEY PLAN 0 ! r I 0 I BUILDING 8 SECTION -,,-,,.-d.--0-. -------------------------------------- .... 0 SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS Oll/l7/20U - A5-8 TEM ECU LA CA LIFO RNIA KEY PLAN CLUBHOUSE SECTION -,/3-,.-., .. -o·----------------------------------------,(D rA~•J-1311 SUllMITT .\l.~S SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ~1/nll - A5-9 II ■ ■ TEMECULA CALI FORNIA ::; .. ::i::;:;:::; SPANISH COLONIAL PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS LOWl>ITC>UUROOFl\1TH TU.llAC0TT,.u.O1nr11om COVut!UG IIAH·RDIJNOAAO!t:0 OOOAWAi"S.\VlNOOWSOR ~" S. E•l'05CO,UNFU'11SHfOOR OAA'--S".llN!OWOOOCN et•Ms l.lOWl'ITCHU>ROOFWITil lIRAACOTT ... CLAYlmROOf COVERING l.M,l,.YINCtUOEGABlESOR SQUAR!'TOWER:5 S,EXPOS[O,UNFU<ISH(OOR OARK-STAlNWWOOD[H 7.H.1.lF-ROUNOARCHfD OOORWATS,WINOOWSOR AAO.OfS i.THICK.'ffiKCOClAD £XTERIORWAJ.1.S 9.WHJTEORV(RVLIGHT NHITRIJ.COlOIIS JO.SflJCCOOROHOAATIVE TIUV[ITTS ll.8Al.CONl[S(09ENOR ROOHOWHllWOOOOR IRON 13.IJSEOFSM.lllWIHOOWS OR5UNlKiHTMITIGATING CA~Pl£SORWOOD£N SHUTTERS 1STOlffMAS~t.'GWITII STRN<GOHESTORV El!M [t(J SIMPU:HIPORGAStEROOf 'MlllDtlflN1'(~(CTING GABtEROOF BAARHOR"·S"Sf\AP[ CONCPITTTIL[S I-Hi[TOUSHTSAHOl-1'-'ISH ORUGHTLACELACEflNIS11 !il'\J (C Q 'ltRll(AUY'1UNG9T0!1 PANtt,1,HOOWSAT FRONTH£VA170'1AAOIN IIIGHVISllllftrlJl("5 ~Ht.lfP .. NWV.1NOOWS ATSIOfSAliORUJ\S STUCCOO\'(RFOAN 'MNOOWIVIOOOORTftlM ,V,.:HEDSTI.ICCOCOlW,Ul PORCHES G.o.AA(;.(OOOftPATT[R>I!; COMPl.lMWTJJIYTOST'IU V.'>lll[TomeOO"iWITll SIUu>!IMUllflRIM lOWPIICl<!l>RlOf\\\fH TERIIA{OTTA CLA\"Tll[ R(X)f l U.\lf.swm,urnrTONO AOOfOVtP.tU.NG B USfOFS,,.<IU.lV.1110011!';. CA/iOP.[SORWOOot:N SHI/TTt:RSf0~1'.JtfC0"'1ROl J.i.STUCCOOROfc:JRATI\lf.lllf 3 1,/AYINClUNGAlll[SOR SOUAA[TOWER.I CONCEPTUAL VIEW ----------------------<0 ll USlOfSMIU.l"lf<OO\\-"S. CANOl'o£SORWOOD£N SHIITTt:RSfOIISUNCOmllOL 0" $" It> 2~" J)" -w-w MAVl~lUOEG.•GtESOR l,QUARETOWERS 1. uvuwm,umr10..o ROOfO"ll'f.lt>V.NG ll USt:OFSMAll\"1NOOW!i. OJiOPICSOltWOOOOi SHI/TTt:RSFORSIJNCOIITR.:H. II BALCOtllfS{OPENORIIOO<[O V.lTHWOOOORl!ION I. WWPIKHWROOFWTTH URRACOTTACLAYTILEl!OOF COVERING TYPICAL BUILDING ELEVATION ---------------------0 3 MAV•NClUD[G&8l£$0A SOUAA[l0\\-1:RS JO S1UCCOOAOECORATIV!:lll[ HNI> l THIC~.SILIHOC\AOF.CTERIOR WIU.lS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA CALIFORNIA 03/2)/2022 - A6-1 "''"""'"" BUILDING 1 - VIEW B BUILDING 2 - VIEW C CONCEPTUAL VIEWS ;;-,,, -~::.:.:..:'._-------(i) rA1t>-13?1 SlJD~IITT.'\ . .l.~5 II ■ Ii A R ,:: SO LANA W INCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA A6-2 CALIFORNIA © KEY PLAN ® BUILDINGS 3 & 2 - VIEW E BUILDING 4 & 3 - VIEW F .... . ... ' BUILDING 5 & 4 - VIEW G BUILDING 6 - VIEW H CONCEPTUAL VIEWS --------------------~(i) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS J'A~t~l 3;1 SUB~l!TT .\L~.• 03/'i.l/'}012 - A6-3 ••• TEMECULA CALIFORNIA I l NOTES: I! 1'(1!,..,ANtNI AUIOMA IIC ll!l!ICAIIO!l SYSlEMS SHALL BE IHSIAUto ON A\l lAN0SCAPE0 Al!{AS REOVI RIUG IRRIGAIK)f/. tOW WAl{I! US( SYSlf,l,.\S SHALL BE IMPUMW IEO . IRl!IGAIION SYSTEM SttAll Bf OESICHEO 10 PREVHl l OVER SPl!AY 01 110 WMKWAYS. PAl!~INC Al1fAS. BUii.DiNGS ANO HHC ES 2) All I RECS SI/All 6f MltuMUM DOU BU-SIAUO. WfAHR ANO/OR StOW-Gl!OW ttlG ll![fS SHAU BE SffH·SIAUD. JI SLOP( BAll~S fl\l( un OR GR EA!fl! H VEIIIICAl ll[K,;ltl WIIH SLOPES Gl!EAl(R IIIAN 01! EOUAl 10 3:1 10 BE tANDSCAPfD Al A MIUIMW WIIH AH APf'ROPl!LAI( GROO UO COVEi!. OUE l~AllON OR LARGE R SIZE teee PER 600 SOU Al!E If[! Of SLOPE AREA. ANO ONE 1.GA UON 01! lARGU SHRUB IOI! (ACII 100 SOUAl!E FEEi Of SLOP1: Al!fA SLOPE flAmS IN EXCESS Of EIGHT fffl IN VEl!IICAL HEIGHT WITH SLOPES Gl!EAIEI! OR (OVAL 10 :?:I SHAU ALSO BE reo vorowuu ONES-GALLON ORLAl!GtR IIIH PEI! l.000 50UA l!f IEE ! Of st.OPE AREA IN AOOnlO tl IOIHE ABO VE R{OUIREMEIUS. .tJ All LANDSC APE AREAS SHALL RECEIVE .T DEP!lt SHRED DED SA RK MULCH 5) All Ullll!IESSHALL BE SC RHllEDW lltt APPIIO PRI/IIE PIii.Hi MAIERI/\L 6) All PAR~WAYS. LAtlDSCAPlllG. ffHCINGAtlDON-SOE LIGH11UGSIIALL BE MA INIAINW 6Y IHE PROPERIYOWNER. 7) All IRRIGAIED AREAS 10 ltAVE MOISIURE SENSORS !HSIALIED lOUl SURE rlANI MAlEl!I/\L SUR VIVAL. SJ A COM6111AIION Of IREES. sumes. ANDGIIO UNDCOVEI! Sllf\L L BE IHC0Rf'ORA1E0 IHlOlANOSCAPING PLANS. MIIJIMUM SIHS All[ AS fOllO WS: · lRHS: 2~-INCII BOX [l5GAUON Sill ACCff'IABlf fOI! SLOf'f SJ · St!RUBS: 5-GAUOH. AHO · Slll!UBS: I-GALLON !Pl/lNlfD OENSHY 10 ACHIEVE 100 PEIICEHI COVERAGE IN ONE YEAR). 9) 01111' SYStfMS Sl!OlAD BE USfD IN /Ill AREAS EXCEf'I IUl!f ll!RIGAIION AND SMA LL Ol!HN.\fNl/ll PLAHIING. 10) NAIIVE AHOOROI.JG tn IOlll!AHI Pl ANIS Will BE !NCORPORAlED WHEREVER POSSIBLE. I I) me APPLICAHI INSURES THAI MATURE PLANIIHGSWU NOi INIERHRE WIIH un mes. AOIACEHt Sllf. EXISIIHG Sll!UC IURES AND ll!AHIC SIGttl LINES 121 IIIIS f'lAH IS lN COIIIOl!MANCE WIIH I Hf CIIY Of IEMfCUI.A DfVflOPM(t•ll CODE AND DESIGN GUIDHI NES AND SllAll BE USED IN CONJUNCIIOIJ WlfH THE CIIY Of IEMEClAA"S CHY-WIDE DE SIGN GUIDELI NES IOI! LANDSCAPING. 131 IREf.S AHO SHl!l.16S SIIAll BE PLA CED A MINi'ilUM Of 5· AWAY fl!O M WATER MEIER. GAS MUEii. Cl! SEWER lA IUfALS: A MtllM UM Of 10" AWAYfl10M POWEi! POUS: ANDA Mlr!IM UMOF 8" AWAY fROM fll!f HYOIIANIS ANO flllf OfPARIMENI SJ>IIINKltl! ANO STANDP IPE CONNECIION S l~J All SHl!LIB Al!fAS ANO SlOl'f ll!RIGAIION SHAU 8f OIIIP-lYP( ll!l!IGAIION AS MEASUl!ED IN GALLONS PfR HOUI!. 151 All PLANlfl!S AOJACW I 10 f'AIIKING SIALLS SHALL R[C{IVf A 12"COHCIIE!f SIEP OUI. !IN AOOlllO tl 10 Ill[ s-wce CUl!8J 161 t100Vfl!t1EA O IIIRICAIIOH ISALLOW fDWl1HIH1◄"01 A NON·PERM{ABl( SURI ACE. POTENTIAL FUTURE STREET TREES BY OTHERS, NOT A PART OF PROJECT. TREES SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. NOTE: 36' WIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT· PER REQM TS, NO TRW ALLOWED IN EASEMENT· ONLY SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS ALLOWED IN EASEMENT CONTACT: DEVRAJ OZA RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT EMAIL: DOZA@RIVCO.ORG I OFFICE: 951-955-1266 s· HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE ON RETAINING WALL CROSSWALK WI STRIPING FUTURE / CALTRANSROW ~ PROPERTY LINE/ CAL TRA NS RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: NOTE: 36' WIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL EASEMENT· PER REQM TS, NO TREES ALLOWED IN EASEMENT· ONLY SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS ALLOWED IN EASEMENT SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CONTACT: DEVRAJ OZA RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL & WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT EMAIL: OOZA@RIVCO.ORG I OFFICE: 951-955-1266 Scale: 1"=50' CUEN!, RfYI..ENN PROP ERTIES CONTACT: DEREt:: EMPEY/OONIENIC RAMUNDO 444 S CEDROS AVB-I UE SOI.ANA BEAC H, CA 9a>75 760-420-IDXl/760-579-865-4 AR CHITECT : ARK ARCHITECTS, INC. CONTACT: FARAMARZ JABBARl / JAMES MCCONNELL/ VESNA MRAKOVIC 2240 FARADAY AVENUE CARLSBAD, CA 92008 858-792-5997 F JABBARl@,ARKARCHITECTS.NET JMCCONNELL@ARKARCHITECTS.NEl VMRAKOVlC@ARKARCHITECTS.ET CIVIL EN GI NEER: MICHAEL BAKER INTERNATIONAL CONTACT: MIGUEL GONZALEZ 408 10 COUNTY CENTER DR STE 200 TEMECULA, CA 92591 951-541·3283 MG0NZALEZ@M8AKERINTL.C0M lAN DSC APE ARCHITECT : DAVIONEAU LT ASSOC IATES CONTACT: BRYAN LOVE 41877 ENTERPRISE CIRCLE NO!mi # 1-40 TEM EC ULA CA. 925 90 951-29 6-3430 ASS ESSO RS PARCEL NUMB ERS (APN) 916-400 -042, 916..QHJ58 LEG AL DESC RJl'T\ON OF PROPERTY : PARCa 1 (AP N NO . 916-400-04 2·8) PARCa 9, AS SHOWN ON TH E MA P ENTTTlf D"PARCEL MAI N0 .36336 FILEDAUGUST 20 ,20 15 IN fl00 K23 9 OF PARCEl MA PS , AT PAGES 33 THROUGH 39, INCLU SIVE, RIV ERS IDE COU NTY REC ORDS . PAR CR 2 (APN. NO 916-400-058 -3} PAR Ca C AS SHOWN ON LOT LINE AD JUSTMENT NO . PAIS· 1434 , AS EVI DE NC ED BY DOC UM ENT REC ORDED DEC EMB ER 15, 20 15 AS INSTR UM ENT N0.20 15-054 2235 Of omctA L REC ORDS. ZONING: SP/ (SPECIFIC PLA N IM PLEMENT ATION EXISTI NG LAN D US E: VACCANT PROPO SED LA ND US E: MULTI -FAMI LY RES IDENTI AL INTE NDED OC CUPANC Y USE· R2 TOT AL GROSS AREA: 15.lACRES VICINITY MAP NOTE: NO EXISTING TREES ON SITE. SHEET l OF 7 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN NORTH CITY OF TEMECULA APN# 916-400-042, 058 "PA20-137 l" 951 1296) 3430 03.29 .22 LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS OUTDOOR KITCHEN FIRE PLACE CABANAS (SIMILAR) TOT LOT (SIMILAR) ENTRY MONUMENT PAVERS AT ENTRY & ENHANCED CROSSWALKS <. ~ ~ "' :::, "' .c .;; N "! "' "! <") 0 ~ < SHEET 2 OF 7 ° ENLARGEMENTS NORTH CITY OF TEMECULA ~~!,;:'.~ APN# 916-400-042, 058 "PA20-1371" 03·29·22 ~ ~ ,. .. ~ ~ ,.. ~ ,.. ~ ,8 · !ft· (t. .) ,, ' •· i, OUTDOOR AREA WITH SEATING 2. TYPICAL COURTYARD 1"=10' SHADE TREE CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND 8QTMHCAt NAME STREET TREES PALM TREES PttO El!!X OACIYLIHRA "MEO JOO L" fOCAL/EMTRYTREE ARSUIUS"MAl!INK MAGNOLIA GiANDlfLORA OUEl!CUS ACRlrOllA BUILDING FOUNDATION TREE/ LANDSCAPE TREE - - - CIHIIAMOMUMCAMP!tQl!A GW ERA PARVlflOIIA PYRUSC. "CHAWICIUI!" f'OOOC ARPUS GIIACUIOI! QU(RCUS ACIWOLIA ROBUIIA AMBIGUA 'lOAHOlrlSIS" SMAlLAllfYTREE [R080111YA DHtfXA LIG USll!UM LUC IO UM JO!ArHIOL{PIS "MAl(SIIC MAUIY- ACCfNT JRff lAG[IISIRO(MIA l "MUS~OCEE" PYl!USC.'"CftAt'IIICIHII" Pl!UNUSC(RASll(RA SHRUB / SUCCULENTS AGAPANlltUSMIIICANUS AGAVE Bl!ACIEOSA AGAVE VILM0111N1At1A ALO( AIIB011£SC[NS ALOE Hl!OX ANIGOlANTttOS fLAVIOUS CALllSlfMON -unu rouu- CISIUSPURPUR(tJS CUPRESSUS SEMPERVIRCNS 0IElf S61CO\OP. ElAEGNUS PUNGtNS (UO NYMUS Sf'P GREVIU{ANOHLU HEIUOMELESARBUIIIOllA HfMl;ROC Al(~flYfll!I'.) UESP(RAlOE PARVlf LOP.A HELICIOIRICIION SfMPfRVRENS KNIPHOtlAVV ARlA IAURLIS NOflll.lS LIGUSIRUM1EXANUM MUHlENBERGIA CAPIUARIS MUftLEN BERGIA RIGfNS OL(A"llllL EOLllE" PH10SPO RUM '"VARltGAIA"" PODOC ARPUS MACROP!IYUUS PRUNUSCAROLIUIANA RHAP UIOLEPIS 'MAJfS!IC BEAUTY" ROSASP(t l[S ROSMAIIINUS .. IUSCAN BLUE" SAi VIA lEUC ANlflA SAIVIAGREGGll XYlOSMA CONGESlUM OISTICTU S BUCCINATORIA MACFAOYEN A UNGUIS-CATI PARIHENOC JSSUS IRlCUSPIOATA GROUNOC QVER 8ACCllAII~ P. ·rIGEOU POINT" BfR6HllSREPENS JUtUf'ERUSHOllllOIHAllS.6tutC1t1P" IIOSMA RltlUS 0. ·r11os1RAIUS" ROSA no wee CARPEi VAllll:IIES " 810-SWAlE / BASINS CAREX PANSA CQMMQNNAMf MA!?INA All8UIUS SOU!HtRN MAGl!OllA COASI LNE OAK CAMPHOIIIIIH AUSIRALIAN wruow CtlANIICIE[RPEAR COAS I llVEOAt: 0AHOLOC US1 BRONHLOO UAI GLOS.SYPRN{I CHAtlliCLHRPEAR PURPlfLfAf PLUM LIIY•Qf.11Jf.Ull[ SQUID AGAVE OCJOPUSAGAV[ 10/ICHAL O[ KANGAROO PAW JAPANESE BOXWOO D DWARF B011L E BRUSH !IALIANCYPRfS.S tOP.lNIGtlllllY SHVER8ERIIY M!t!...SlU ~ WUCOLS 1Q!:!.li ,o·em AVG.10'0.C. MED IUM z~- IIOX AS suo wu \OW row ISGAUOU AS~HOWII LOW ISGAltON ASSUOW II LOW M(OIUM SGALL0r4 SGMIOIJ SGALLOH SGALIOH SGAllON 5GAll0N SGAUON SGALLOII SGALION SGALlOrJ SGA\lOrJ s ceuo« 3. GATED AND FENCED DOG PARK 1"=20' LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS EUON YMUS S GAILOH GR{Vlll(A S oxuo« IOYOH S GAltOti DAYll.Y SGAUOrJ l!EO YUC CA ICAllON BLUE OAT GRASS I GAtlO/J RfO HOI POHR I GAILON BA YlAURU SGAllOII lfXAS RANGER S GALlOfl SGAILOU l'IIJ~MUULY I GAILON OHR GRASS I GAtlON VARlfGAJEO MOC ~ ORAUGE S GALLON YEWPINf SGALlON CAl!O llNA CHERRY lAURH .5 GAllON INDIAHAWrHOR// $GAIL0N SHRUB ROSE SCALLON UPRIGHI ROSEMARY S CAI LON MEXIC/\NSAGE SCALLON AUTUMN SAGE 5 GALLON SHINY LEAF ~YLOSMA S GAHON eeo TRUMPET VINE CAfSClAWVINE BO STONfVY DWARF COYOl f BRUSH CRHPINGBARBER IIY 5.A GHEAf RCX::~ROSf BLVE CIIIPJUtllPER PIIO SIRAIE ROSEMARY GROUNDCOVER ROSE SCALLON SGALLON SGAllON CALIFORNIA MEADO W SEDC E lltlERS MfO kJM tow W W 1·0.c. 3·0.c. YO.C. YO.C. J"O.C 3"0.C. ro.c . co.c. co.c . :ro.c. ro.c . ro.c . e-o.c. s·o.c. 70.C. 70.C. 70.C. 70.l'.. s·o.c. eo.c. 2·0.c. 2·0.c. 4·0.c. co.c 4"0.C. J"O.C. J"O.C. 4·0.C. rcc. s·o.c. 10·0.c. 10·0.c. 10·0.c. rz-o,c. MHl lUM tow WW tow ,ow ,ow MED IUM ,ow row ,ow M~DIUM W W M(OIUM ,ow MlOIU,I.I ,ow M(DIUM ,ow W W WW MEDIUM WW MED IUM ,ow MED IUM MfO IUM MED IUM ,ow MEDIUM MEDIUM MEDIUM ,ow tow ,ow tow ,ow MEDIUM N N 0: "! M 0 ~ < SHEET 3 OF 7 ° ENLARGEMENTS NORTH --------------------------------------------- CITY OF TEMECULA APN# 916-400-042, 058 "PA20-1371" 951~!!430 03.29.22 !" - I TYPICAL PLANT LEGEND BOTANICAl NAME l,'olN SIZE SPACING VIUCOLS lONE 4 BUILDING 8 0 0 0 0 ecca (E'!IRYTDFF OUERCUSAGRIFOI.IA CUPAt!IOPSISANACAROOIOES IM GNOllA GRAtllJlflORA PHOWIX DACT"1.IFERA "MEOJOOL" BIIIDINGEOIINDATIONJREF /I ANDSC4PFJRFF G8JERAPARWLORA PYRUSC."CHANTICLEER" PODOCARPUS GR ... cures CINNAMOIAUIACAMPHORA SM611 AIIEXIREE ER10BOIRYADEFLEXA UGUSTRUtillUCOUti\ RHAPHOL EPIS"MA JESTICBEAUTY LAGERSIROE I.IIA I. "MUSKOGEE" PYRUSC."CHAtfllClEER" PRUNUS CERASIFERA I ARGE FOllNQ AIIPN / SCR EEN SHfUIBS GRE\1LLEANOElLH HETEROMELESARBUTIFOUA lEUCOPHYLLUM F. 'GREEN CLOUD' PITTOSPORUM "VARIEGAIA" RHAPH!OlEPIS'MA.l'STICBEAIJJY X'll.OSMA CONGESIUM I~ UGUSIRUMIEXA NUM PHORIJIUIATENAX'DARl:DHIGHr RHAPHIOLEPISUI.\BEllAlA"/.,.lfNOR"" l!OS MA RII-US "IUSCANBLUE" RUELUABRITTONIA SMALL SHRUBS I ORNAMENT Al. GRASSES AGAPMITHUSAFRICANU5 ANIGOIANTHOSRAVIDUS HEt.lcROCALLISHYBRID HESPERALOEPARVIRORA HEUCTOTR'ICHONSEtnERVf!ENS MUHlENBERGIACAPILLAli'IS MUHLENBERGIARIGENS PHINISETUMSETACEUM Q'j COLU/v\NAR/ACCENT SHRUBS ,_, LAURUSN08l.lS GROUNOCOVEli' CISJUSSALVIFOUUS .UNf'ER\J5HOf!IIONTALIS'8LUECHIP' ROSMARINUSO.'PROSTRAIU$' ROSA 'HOWER CARPET VARIETIES' 10' Scale: 1"=10' AUSTRAUA!I\VILLOVI CHAmlCLHli'PEAR CAMPHORJREE COAST LIVEOAK GLOSSY PRIVET IIIDIAHAVITHORN GRE\llLEA TOYON UPRIGHT R05EMAR Y 1-'EXICANRUELLIA PINKMUHLY DEER GRASS PURPLE FOUNTAIN GRASS SAYlAUREL YEWPUlE CAROLINA CHERRY LAUREL DWARF COYOTE BRUSH CREEl'INGBARBERRY SAGELEAFROCKROSE PROSTRATE ROSEMARY GRO\JNOCOVER ROSE 20' SGALLON SGALLON SGALLON SGALLOII 3·0.c J'O.C 2'0,C 3'0.C J"O.C 2·0.c !GALLON 2"0.C SGALLON 2'0.C. !AEDIUM 1-AEDIUM LOW WW WW MEDIUM MEDIUM IAEDIUM IIH!lUM !IH!IUM WW lOVI WW WW MEDIUM MEDIUM DECORATIVE ROCK. DECOMPOSED Gli'AtJITE AIIO SOULDER~ SHEET 4 OF 7 TYPICAL PLANTING 40' NORTH ____________________________________________ CITY OF TEMECULA A P N # 9 16 -4 0 0 -0 4 2 , 0 5 8 "P A 2 0 -13 7 1" 951 296 3<130 03.29.22 P R O J E C T E D LNI D S C AP E IR RI G AT IO N W A T E R U S E D S o la n a Wi n e he a t e r H ill s HYtl ROZO NE NUM BER EV O TitA NSPIRA ll O N RATE ll!YH).e.)•)· AREA OF HYD RO ZONE 1:son, PLANT COE FF ICIENT 0\C)(EX1tll~6) YEA RLY PLA NT W ATER DEMA ND jSUPI XST£PljR£SUl I lt411,YR) TO TAL AREA W ATER DEMA NO co~Xflfl,.IO;IIUH1RESUlTIIWFTI IRRI GAll O N EFFICtENCY 1~0'•XST£P)/ HYDRO ZON E W ATER DEMA ND cwn1tr.DJrnDJ•111ESU1.T111wn1 2S S ·2SR" 3'TR"' WALL AND FENCE LEGEND 109,358 CU.FT/YR . ALLO W ABLE PROJECTOE MA ND SHADE LEGEND 333.i 29 CU.FT /YR . TOTAL ALL AREA S W ATER 0. 709.358 MW A • MA XIM UM W ATER ALL O'N ANCE 333,92' EW U • ESTI MATE D W ATER USE 41.0J•A, %o!ES11 MATE O W ATER U SE PROPOSED TREE AT 3/4 MAnJRE GROWTH '1SS•D RIP SYSTE M StLOW ) '2SS "D RIP SYSTE M S (MOO ERA TE ) •• 2SR 11 SHRUB RO TO RS (LOW ) "'3TR •1\I RFR O TO RS •4T S11 T\J RFSPRAYHEA DS = CONCRETE BLOC K SOUND WALL - T HEIGHT PER SOU ND AITTNUATIO N REPORT - WALL TO BE'TAN" ONE-SIDED SPUT-FACE BLOC K 5' HIGH TUBE STEE L POO l COU RTY ARDS, DOG PARK & BO UNDARY FENCE/ GATES - COLOR: ''BLACK'' 5' HIGH TUBE STEEL FENCE ON RETAINING WAU - COLOR: '111ACK'' SEE SHEET 6 FOR WALL AND FENCE DETAILS --- ---- ---- ---------------- LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ---:. IRRIG A11 0 N SYSTE M O ISTit lBU11 0 H EFFlC. 1111131.EI) PRO PO SED IRRIG ATI ON OP ERA TI ON Ef FIC. 30.530 SHADED AREA OF PARKING STAUS (BY CARPORTS ) SHADED AREA OF PARKING STAUS (BY TREES) TOTAL PARKING AREA: TOTAL SHADED AREA: PERCENT SHADED: 73, 401 SQ. FT. 32,223 SQ. FT. 43% NOTE: 36' WIDE RIVERSI DE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR OL EASEMENT • PER REQM TS, NO TREES ALLOWED IN EAS EMENT - ONLY SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS ~ ALLOWED IN EASEMENT ~ ~t ~\ Scale: 1 "=40' ~ <( i= ~ a:, ::, V? .c ui N "! O- N SHEET 5 OF 7 8 w < SHADE PLAN / o WALL & FENCE PLAN NOTE: 36' WIDE RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTR OL EAS EMENT· PER REQMTS, NO TREES AUOWED IN EAS EMENT. ONLY SHRUBS AND GROUNDCOVERS ALLOWED IN EASEMENT NORTH -------------------------------------------- CITY OF TEMECULA A PN # 916-400-042, 058 "PA 20 -1371" 03.29.22 8RACKEJ ATTACHMENJQfTAlt NOTES: I. PAJtJT VI/ONE COAT EPOlCYPRIMER & OIJE COAT EXTERIOR ENAMEL. COLOR TO BE OOERM-~EO. 2. A.LL MATERIAL TO BE PRE-GALVANIZED. (i) 7"SO TUBULAR SIEEL POST \<If CAP@: 8"·0 O.C.MAX. G) 3/<ROUNOPICKEIS'i .. 1;- OC. o 1·3/8" ROUND TUBULAR SIEEL RAILS !Of' &BOTTOM Q FINISH GRADE o ti" X 2•· DOMED CONCRETE FOOTING G CAULK JOJNI VI/ CLEAR SILICON 0 F€NCE RAILSllf>S OVER POST ASSEMBLY G) OUlStDE DIAMETER SUGHTL Y LESS IHAt! INSOE DIAMETER OF TOP OR BOIIOM ... 0 7" X 1'FENCE POST !OR BLOCK PORTION OFVIAlL/PILASTfR @ COMPACTED SUBGRADE•PER SOILS REPOlffS RECOMMENDATIONS SEEOETAll \ 2. All MATERIAL TO 8E PRE-GALVANIZED. 0 2 SQ. TUBULAR STEEL POST W/ CAP lq. 8"-0" O.C. MAX. 0 3/4" SQUARE PICKETS•$ ,_1.f o.c. 0 l.J/l!J"SQUARETUBULARSTEEl RAllS TOP g. 80TTOM 0 flNISH GRADE 0 ex a- OOMEOCONCRETE FOOTING 0 CAULK JOINT W/CLEAR SILICON 0 FENCE RAIL SLIPS OVER POST ASSEMBLY () OUTSIDE DIAMETER SUGHTL Y LESS THAN INSIDE DIAMETER OF TOP OR BOTTOM RAIL. 0 2 X 7' FENCE POST !OR BLOCK PORTION OF WALL/PILASTER. SOLID CAP ® COMPACTED SUBGRADE-PER SOII.SREPORT"S RECOMMENDATIONS (D CONCRETE MOW CURB 5'-0" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE SCALE: l/2 = 1'-0 42" HIGH TUBULAR STEEL FENCE SCALE: 1{2"=: 1'-0" (D SPLIT FACE BLOCK COLUMN (WHERE OCCURS) @ PRECISION BLOCK PILASTER CAP @ 6X8Xl6SPLIT FACE BLOCK (ONE SIDED) 0 PRECtSION BLOCK WALL CAP @ FINISH GRADE SHEET 6 OF 7 W ALL & FENC E DETAILS LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ____________________________________________ CITY OF TEMECULA APN # 91 6-400-042, 058 "PA20-1371" 951 296 3430 03.29.22 ~ ~ ~ a:, ::, V) .c ui N N 0: N (") 0 u.i SHEET 7 OF 7 < 0 ENHANCED CROSSWALK EXHIBIT LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ~ REYLENN PROPERTIES LLC NORTH ---------------------------------------------------------- CITY OF TEMECULA 9,,,,,.,,430 APN# 916-400-042, 058 "PA20- l 371" 03·2•·22 S IT E P H O T O M ET R IC P LA N S T R E E T L E V E L ----------------------0 REYLENN DEVELOPMENT SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS ~ Im ~E'i -- A R K 0&/16/20!~ E1-1 TEMECULA CALIFORNIA '"'"',.,:..,···· luD::!\·':';/"'' " .. (""'".'"' \ \ y• . ·_. \ \ O' 6' 16" H" -w---- SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE "'" SYMBOL "'"' flXTIJ Rf ""' WATTS VOLTS Mffi/CATALOC OESCRlPTIOH DES m>E MOUNTING DESC LED 15' POLE 54'1,' LED 5' 208 LITH ONIA OR EO U-'l 15' HIGH NARROW SANO AMBER LEO @ .a LIGHT N8' DSXt LE0-P4- POl[ MOUNT ED LIGHT FIXTU RE, eve .l,166 AMBLW-TJM-208- INTEGRAL MOTION SENSOR DIMl,ONG, 1.0.1 LUMENS SPA-PJR-Of-HS- HOUSE SHIELD, 4" SQUARE STEEL ODBXD I~.:.•- A"1n _;;._·...:...n;•1 nR~g LED 42" HIGH 20W U:0 20 200 UTHONIA OR EQUAL 8" OIIW.ETE:R. 42" HIGH NARROW @ l8! BOLLARD NBA KBA8 L£D-16C- BAND AMBER LEO BOLL.ARO LIGHT BUG LIGHT 1,996 450-AMBLW-SYM- FIXTURE, SYMETRIC D!STRIBl!TION, 1.0.1 LUMENS 208-0f-0DBXD DARK BRONZE FINIS!I ANO ELECTRONIC ORM:R LED CANoe, 26W LEO 26 200 LITHONIA OR EOUAI. PHOSPHOR CONVE:RT£D AMBER Lto @ )::( "" DSXSC LEO-lOC- CARPORT CANOPY LIGHT FIXTURE, 2,899 700-AMBPC-T5R- lYPE 5 RECTANGULAR OPTICS ANO LUMENS 208-SRM-0F-DDBXD OAAK BRONZE FINISH LED RECESSED ISW L[O " '2D SPECTRUM OR EOU"1. J" DIAMETER RECESSED LEO @ ,ooow SRJDMO XTIJL 0010 ADJUSTABLE DOWN LIGHT nXTURE @ 1.285 120 RD1JF JOK MO W1Tli 0-10V D\1,0,UNG, 15 DEGREE LUYENS 11:'N GL WL ADJUSTABLE, AND CLEAR GI.ASS LENS. LED RECESS£0 15W LED " ,20 SPECTRUM OR EOUAL J" DIAMETER RECESSED U:O § 3000K SRJOMO l(T1JL 0010 ADJUSTABLE DOWN LIGHT FIXTU RE ® 1,285 120 EM RDlJF JOK wrrn 0-10V CIMtJ.ING, IS DEGREE LUM[NS MD t.lW GL WL ADJUSTABLE, AND CLEAR GI.ASS LEN AND 90 MIN BATTERY PACK 8>.CKUP. LED INCROUND I2W LED 12 12 WAC LICl-ffiNG OR J" INGROUND UPLIGHT, TILTABLE ANO @ ◊ JOODK EQUAL ADJUSTABLE BEAM ANGLE, INl'EGRAL 50S 50JI-JOBBR Olt.lMER, SOUO DICAST BRASS LUMENS LED TREE RING (6)7W LEO " m FOCUS UG!illNG LEO UP-DOWN PALM ma: UCH'T. 75W @ ❖ UP-DOWN 3000K FA-TR-246H-277-BRT 27NACTO 12VDC TAAN SFORUER. TREE UGHT NARROW AND (6) RX0-05LID- STRAP, HEIGHT RIO LAMP ORltNTAllON n.ooo P2<M-O-BITT PER LANDSCAPE DESIGNER LED PENDANT 59W LEO S9 ,20 LITHONIA OR EOU"1. 22" PENDANT LICHT FIXTURE WITH @ @ 3000K EHL22 ST 49LEO CLASS CLEAR flAT LENS, SMOOTH 4,955 350W.. JK GCF RS BASE AND BLACK FINISH. LUMENS MVOLT OBIJ<O LEO PENDANT 59W LEO 59 12D LITHONIA OR EQUAL 16" PENDANT UGKT FIXTURE WITH @ -i:t- 3000K EHL16 ST 49LED GI.ASS Cl.EAR FLAT lENS, SIJOOTH 4,955 35DMA 3K GCF RS BASE ANO Bl.ACK FINISH • LUMENS MVOLT OBU<O LED POST 47W LED 47 120 LUt.!INIS OR EQUAL 15' HIGH NARROW BA.NO AMBER ® mi: NBA MA2 0 L1U<2A -TYP 5 POST LEO LIGHT FlXT URE wm t 2,125 208 BKT MS 0-lOV DIMMING. INTE GRAL MOTION LU .l~EN S SENSOR . AN O El ECTR ONIC DRIVE R. LED WALL AT 25W LED 25 12D LIT HONIA. OR EQUAL 10' HIGH LEO WAL L MOU NT ED LIGHT © 1-{Ql 10·-o· 2,700 1< WS T LEO P2 271< VF nxru RE, WH rf[ HOUSING, FO RW AR D ABOVE 3,163 MV OLT OWHXO THROW, WITH ELE CTRO NIC ORrvE R GRADE LU!.l[NS INCAN D. WAU.. AT (J)60 W (3)60 '2D HINKL£Y OR EO U"1. OECORA TM WALL MOUNT LAN TERN @ ' 10·-o· 236902 UGI-fl FIXTU RE , DIE-CAS TE D ABOVE AL UMINUM HOUSING, OECORA TTVE GROUND SCROLLED AR M, DAR K BRON ZE FlNISH. UGHHNG FIXTU RE NOTES: ,. PR OVI DE SP EC1Fl£D LIGHTING t.!AN UFACTl.J RER fC R EA CH LIGHT FIXT URE. ~y SUBS TITU TION S SHAU. MEET OR EX CEED Tl-I E SPEC!flC A.llONS OF THE LISTE D MAN UFACTU RERS CA.TAI.DC NUMBER . 2. COORDINA TE Ail nxru RE COLORS, REFl ECT ORS , FlHlSHES, IJOUtm NG LOCA TIONS AN D HEIGHT S WIT H AR CHITE CT. PO O L/C LUB HO U S E PHO TO M ETR IC PLA N I::: 1.::-.1.7:I:: I·:: I STR EET LEV EL 0) R E Y L E N N D E V E L O P M E N T SOLANA W INCHEST ER HIL LS T E M E C U L A C A L I F O R N I A ~ ~ m a - 06/15/2011 E2-1 , .. ,,:::·:.~, ..... :::::i:i::::;:; REYLENN SOLA NA WINCHESTER HILLS NOT TO SCALE OAYLIGIT Ll t-E CAL TRANS LAl'OSCAPE aTTER Lit£ RET AINING WALL S<U<JWALL - EXISTING UTILITIES {AS LAEELED) PROP OSOl STQRl,I OR AIN PROPOSED SANITARY SEll'ER -8-/,•~ PROPOSED DOl£STIC WATER [ = J PROf'OSEO ST°"" OET£NTION £11'.ISTING CONT C.W ---,,_'($1-~ PROPOS£0 CONTC.W - _ / DAVLIGff/GftAOING Ul,HTS FRG>. RET. ll'Al.L WITH 5'H!Qi TL81.l..AR STEEL f"ENCE Q<l HP City PROJ:CT y SECTION A-A t-OT TO SCALE of "'IT PATIO CONCEPTUAL GRADING FOR PA20-1371 Temecula, County of State of California TRACT "'t1:';':."' R/W ,I "' I :JI: """"' SECTIONB-8 NOT TO SCALE TRACT 001,,,..T lc~RANSLNDSCAPC I •I• IUT£R BASIN SECTIONC-C NOT TO SCALE Riverside, R/W R/W EXISTING Jt.F'ROYDENTS PER L020-5057 PRCP. JLFOOVD,CNTS PR<P •I• 78' :,'. I . ~- !·" TE MECULA CENTE R DRIVE SECTIONE-E J',OT TO SCALE EXISTING lt,t>ROV(MENTS PER L020-5057 TC , .. ~ ' J?c$ .. EX. SJOEOALJ</7·1/· ···1 •=-- EK. U.t.OSCAPE STRIP EX. Q.RB AI\O QJTTER 78' 56' PRCf'. Tll'ROV£MENTS TE MECULA CENTE R DRIVE SECTION F-F NOT TO SCALE PROf' R/W ,,· APN 916-41J0-061 PRCJ". SlOCWALK PER STD. 401 INTERIM tDI lRRIGATID t.U..D-1 COVCR TO EE PRJVATEl..Y MAJNTA!t£0 PRCP. Cl.RI .VO GUTTER STD. 200 OR 947 PRCPOSEO GRADE SWALE ff f!N!St-£D fLCIM Gf GARA(£ FU>OR 000 ADA PATH OF TRAVEL /:J.. FIRE HYffiANT ~l FIRELAI\E PROf'OSEO CAL TRANS R/W LIMITS Of WORK PER THIS PRO...ECT EX. R/W »::IT A PART Of" THIS FR<U.:CT, lr.PRO V!liENTS TO BE CO.STRUCTED PER SEPARATE CITY CIP PRQ..[CT 134' •t• 67' 67' 55' 55' 12' DATA TAB LE APN: 916-400--0-42 t -058 PRO.£CT NAME: SQANA WINO-ESTER LEGAL DE SO U P TJ <lt PARC(L 1 (APN t,Kl . 916-400-042-6) PARCEL 9, AS SOOWN ON ne MAP ENTITLED "PARCI:l MAP l'«l. 36336" FILEO AOOJST 20, 2015, IN BOa< 239 Cf" PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGf.:S 33 Tf-flOJGH 39, INCLUSIVE, RIVERSIDE COUHY RECORDS . PA.RCEL 2.: (APN NJ. 916-400-058-3) PARCEL C AS SHO'IIH ON LOT lit-£ AOJJST\EN T so . PA\5-1434, AS EVIOCNCEO BY OOCU,£NT RECORDED OCCO&:R 15, 2015 AS INSTRUENT NO. 201~-0542235 if OFFICIAL REcmDS. Af'PROXII.IATE EARTli'llmk. OOA.NTITIES RAW CUT: 28,900 CY RAW Fill; 16,300 CY f\ET; 12,600 CY• •8ALANC£0 ON SITE DATE MO scx..fiCt OF TCf'OGRAPHY: fLOWN ON ...lH: 2013, BY 1/ol..At{) AERIAL Sl.RVEYS ,. , .. "'IT PATIO 24' , .. 7' 2' X-GUT T DATE STR EET (FUTU RE IMPROVE MENT S) SECTION D-D MJT TO SCALE 406!0COUHTYCEi-n'EROR. SUITI:200 TEMECut.A,CA.92591 PHONE:(951)676-8042 INT EA NAT ION AL MBAXERINTLCOM rur. L».OSCAPE STRJP TO BE PRJVATEl. Y MAINTA!t-£0 FUT. SIOCIALK rur. LmlSCAPE STRIP TO BE PRIVATELY lolAINTAll'£0 FUT. LAI-OSCAPE STRIP TO EE PRJVAltlY MAINTAlt>ED FUT. SJOCWALK FUT. LAt()SCAPE STRIP TO IE PRIVATELY MAINTAI/IED SHEET INDEX TITLE 51--EET At-0 SECTIONS Ca-lCEPTUAL GRA DING PLAN ADA PATH Cf" TRAVEL WET UTILITIES 00 FIRE S£RV JC£ Michael Baker N.A.P. -Sci--- FF <T 000 APN 91 6-400 -061 1i':fm EKTEff'R~ 5 10€0..U. A 'AP ."' ~· 0 ~ 8 100 150 SCAl.£: l",.50' DAYLIGHT Llr-E CAL TRANS LAl'-OSC APE RETAJNING WALL SOOO WALL EXISTING UT ILITIES (AS PROPOSED STORM DRA IN ~) = SANITARY SEWER - Da,CSTIC WATER PROPOSED STORM DET£NT ION EXISTING CCM ~ OAYL IGHT/GRAO ING ~It.ti TS PROPOSED GRADE SWAJ.£ -- FINISl-£D FLOOR GARAOC FLOOR ADA PATH CF TRAVO. FIRE HYCA ANT FIRE LAI'£ 50 - Michael Baker INTERN """"" . A f I Q N A L PHONE: (951f:1= t.lBAXERINTL COM 2 :~~;~ :U NTY CENTER 0 SHEET NO. 2 0' _4_SHEETS r N.A.P. APN 916-400 ..,. """' -061 orTUl"II ISE 5 TDIE O.U ~· ~5 O t-i ' ;:;- 50 100 150 SCAl.E: 1"•50' -------- - - -- - /\ -=-=-~- --..J ~ --==-=- --- - .J 000000 ADA PATH CJ'" TRAVEL Michael Baker N T E R N AT I D N A L ::~:;~f:,:'.:: . MBAKERJNTLCOM 2 EIDAfllmft o, ~ CONCEPTUAL GRADIN _. REYI..EN PA2D-1371 GI PLAN NSOI.ANAWI AD A PATH OF Nai ESTER HILI.S TRAVEL SHEET NO. 3 OF 4_SHEETS DATA TABLE N.A.P. APN: 916-400-042 t -058 PRO£CT NAIE: SQ.ANA. WINCt£STER LEGAL DESCRIPTICN: PARCEL 1 (APN NO. 916-400-042-8) PARCEL 9, AS SHOWN ON 1l-E MAP ENTITLED "PARCEL MAP NO. 36l36" FILED Al.QJST 20, 2015, IN BOO< 239 Of PARCEL I.W'S , AT PAGES 33 Tl-ROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, RIVERSIDE COLM'Y RECCAOS. PARCEL 2: (APN I\O. 916-4oo---058-3) PARCEL C AS SI-OIIN ON LOT Lr/'£ ADJJSTIENT NO. PAlS-1434, AS EVIDENCED BY CXlCIACNT RECOOOED occoern 15, 2015 AS INSTRIM:'.NT 1-l). 2015-0542235 or CITICIAL REWtt!S. APPROXUlATE EARTI-MCRK OJANTJTIES RAW OJT: 2!!, 900 CY RAW FILL: 16,JOO CY t-ET: 12,600 CY• ~ ON SIT£ DATE A.ti) SOLRCE or TOPOORAPHY : FLOWN ON JU£ 2013, BY IN...00 AER IAL SLRVE YS EXISTING UTILITIES {AS LABELED) -5f)- PROPOSED STORM DRAIN -s~- PROPOS[I) SANITARY SOl£R -rlRE- PROPOSED OOE STIC WATER PROPOS[l)DCJ,ESTJCWAlER [ = J PROPOSED STORM OCTENTIO'< EXISTING ca-rr!X.R ~ PROPOSEDCOOT<J..R PROPOSED GRACE SWAL.E FINISI-ED FLOOR GfC GARAOC FLOOR 000 ADA PATH or TRAVEL A f!R[ HYDRANT{4-1/2" i,: 2-1/2" ,c 2-1/2") ® FIRE DEP ARTliCNT CW£CTION (FCIC) ~ PEOCSTAL lt«>ICATOR VALVE (PIV) ~ FIRELAt£ 0 165' FH RADIUS REAO< Michael Baker ~0810 COUNTY CENTER OR., SUITE200 TEMEClA.A,CA.92591 PHONE:(95\)676,6(),12 INTERNATIONAL M8AKE RIITTL CO~ CONC EPTUAL GRADING PLA N PA20-1371 REYLEN N SOLANA WINaiESlER HILLS WET UTILITIES At{) FIRE SERVICE PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA20-1371, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 349 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY BUILT ON 15.1 ACRES LOCATED AT THE TERMINUS OF DATE STREET, APPROXIMATELY 900 FEET SOUTH OF YNEZ ROAD (APNS: 916-400-042, 916-400-042), AND MAKING A FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS NOT SUBJECT TO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER SECTIONS 15182 AND 15162 OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On December 2, 2020, Reylenn Properties filed Planning Application: No. PA20- 1371, a Development Plan in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Project and environmental review on June 1, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA20-1371, subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that in accordance with Temecula Municipal Code S ection 17.05.010.F (Development Plan): A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. The General Plan and Harveston Specific Plan allow for a multifamily residential community at the project site. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Harveston Specific Plan. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Harveston Specific Plan and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, it has been determined that no further environmental review of the proposed project is required (Section 15182, Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan and Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations); 1. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and no further environmental review is required. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. (Section 15162, Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations). Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 349 unit apartment community is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-1371, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 349-unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street, approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road., subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 1st day of June, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that t he forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 1st day of June, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20 -1371 A Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date St. approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Rd. Assessor's Parcel No.: 916-400-042 916-400-058 Residential (Greater Than 14.1 du/ac) MSHCP Category: Residential-Attached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Multi-Family Multi-Family Attached (5 or More Units) June 1, 2022 June 1, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 23 Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Determination include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 23 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved tentative map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved Development Plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13). 5. Block Wall Coating. All perimeter constructed block walls in the public view shall be finished with an anti-graffiti coating and shall provide documentation confirming the installation of the coating. 6. Consistency with Development Agreements. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be subject to Development Agreement No. 2002 026470 recorded on January 16, 2002 and Amendments. 7. Compliance with EIR. The Harveston Specific Plan was formally adopted in 2001 and first amended in 2003 and again in 2020 to allow for residential development on the project site. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified as part of this effort (EIR SCH No. 2019070974). The project and all subsequent projects within the site have been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR and shall comply with all mitigation measures identified in the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program. 8. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 9. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 10. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 11. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 48 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 12. Page 3 of 23 Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 13. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco White Flour (SW7102) Wood Elements Kaffee (SW6104) Metal Elements Urban Bronze (SW7048) Roof Tile Barcelona Garnet 14. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 15. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 16. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 17. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 18. Phased Construction. If construction is phased, a construction staging area plan or phasing plan for construction equipment and trash shall be approved by the Director of Community Development. 19. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 20. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 21. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 22. Page 4 of 23 Fireplaces. Per the Mitigation Monitoring & Reporting Program no residential units shall be constructed with fireplaces or hearths. 23. Fiscal Impact Analysis Compliance. The Project is required to address impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated September, 2021 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of One Hundred Ten Dollars ($110.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of twelve point eight percent (12.8%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel within the project for building permits for residential construction have been issued as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. 24. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 25. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 26. Page 5 of 23 Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 27. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 28. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 29. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 30. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 31. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 32. Page 6 of 23 Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 33. MSHCP Pre-Construction Survey. Within three days of the start of any ground disturbing activity during the nesting season (February 1 to August 31 for songbirds; January 15 to August 31 for raptors), a qualified biologist shall conduct a survey to determine if there are active nests within the onsite trees and vegetation. If an active nest is not found, no biological monitor is required. If active nests are detected, a minimum buffer (e.g., 300 feet for songbirds or 500 feet for raptors) around the nest shall be delineated and flagged, and no construction activity shall occur within the buffer area until a qualified biologist determines the nesting species have fledged and is no longer active or the nest has failed. The buffer may be modified (i.e., increased or decreased) and/or other recommendations proposed (e.g., a temporary soundwall) as determined appropriate by the qualified biologist to minimize impacts. The qualified biologist shall monitor the removal of onsite trees and vegetation. Nest buffer distance will be based on species, specific location of the nest, the intensity of construction activities, existing disturbances unrelated to the project and other factors. 34. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 14 day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 14 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 35. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 36. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. The pre construction clearance survey shall be conducted within 14 days of ground disturbance to document the continued absence of burrowing owl from the project site as well as the buffer areas. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the clearance survey, the project site as well as the buffer areas shall be resurveyed. 37. Sensitivity Training. Prior to any ground disturbing activities associated with the Project, the qualified archaeologist shall conduct cultural resources sensitivity training for all construction personnel. Construction personnel shall be informed of the types of archaeological resources that may be encountered, and of the proper procedures to be enacted in the event of an inadvertent discovery of archaeological resources or human remains. The Applicant shall ensure that construction personnel are made available for and attend the training and retain documentation demonstrating attendance. 38. Page 7 of 23 Native Sediments. If grading activities are proposed within intact native sediments on the Project Site which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater, the qualified archaeologist shall monitor ground disturbing activities. If cultural resources are discovered, the qualified archaeologist shall have the authority to stop and redirect grading in the immediate area of a find in order to evaluate the find and determine the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified archaeologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the archaeologist, in consultation with the Applicant and the City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. 39. Previously Graded Sediments. If grading activities occur within previously graded sediments and inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered, the construction contractor shall suspend grading within 100 feet of the find until the qualified archaeologist evaluates the find and determines the appropriate next steps in consultation with the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 40. Paleontological Sensitivity Training. Prior to start of earth moving activities that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site, the qualified paleontologist shall conduct pre construction worker paleontological resources sensitivity training. This training shall include information on what types of paleontological resources could be encountered during excavations, what to do in case an unanticipated discovery is made by a worker, and laws protecting paleontological resources. All construction personnel shall be informed of the possibility of encountering fossils and instructed to immediately inform the construction foreman or supervisor if any bones or other potential fossils are unexpectedly unearthed in an area where a paleontological monitor is not present. 41. Qualified Paleontologist. Prior to the start of earth moving activities, each project applicant shall retain a qualified paleontologist defined as one meeting SVP standards (Society for Vertebrate Paleontology, 2010) to attend any pre grade construction meetings to determine when and where excavations extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site Working with each project applicant and the construction crew, the qualified paleontologist shall determine a paleontological monitoring schedule. The qualified paleontologist, or a paleontological monitor working under the direct supervision of the qualified paleontologist, shall monitor all ground disturbing activity that are proposed to extend into intact native sediments which are anticipated to be 10 feet in depth or greater on the Project Site. The location, duration, and timing of monitoring shall be determined by the qualified paleontologist designated for the Project in consultation with each project applicant and City and shall be based on a review of geologic maps and grading plans. During the course of monitoring, if the qualified paleontologist can demonstrate based on observations of subsurface conditions that the level of monitoring should be reduced, increased, or discontinued, the paleontologist, in consultation with each project applicant and City of Temecula may adjust the level of monitoring, as warranted. Monitoring activities shall be documented in a Paleontological Resources Monitoring Report to be prepared by the qualified paleontologist at the completion of construction and shall be provided to the City of Temecula and filed with the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County within six (6) months of grading completion for each individual project on the Project Site. 42. Page 8 of 23 Discovery of Paleontological Resources. In the event of unanticipated discovery of paleontological resources when a paleontological monitor is not present, each construction contractor shall cease ground disturbing activities within 50 feet of the find until it can be assessed by the qualified paleontologist. The qualified paleontologist shall assess the find, implement recovery and reporting measures, if necessary, and determine if paleontological monitoring is warranted once work resumes. 43. Inadvertent Discoveries and Subsurface Cultural Resources. If inadvertent discoveries of subsurface cultural resources are discovered either within the intact native sediments or previously graded sediments, grading activities shall be suspended within 100 feet of the find and the Project Applicant, the qualified archaeologist, and the Pechanga Tribe shall assess the significance of such resources and shall meet and confer regarding the mitigation for such resources. • Pursuant to PRC Section 21083.2(b), avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources. • If preservation in place is not feasible, the Project Applicant and Pechanga Tribe shall discuss reburial of the resources on the Project property, in perpetuity. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. • If the Project Applicant and the Pechanga Tribe cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for such resources, these issues will be presented to the Planning Director for decision. The Planning Director will make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources and will take into account the religious beliefs, customs, and practices of the Pechanga Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the Planning Director will be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City of Temecula City Council. • Any newly discovered cultural resources shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation pursuant to state law prior to restarting grading within 100 feet of the discovered resources. The cultural resources evaluation of the newly discovered cultural resources shall be detailed in a Cultural Resources Treatment Plan (“Plan”). Furthermore, after ground disturbing activities are completed, the archeologist shall prepare a monitoring report (consistent with the County of Riverside Phase IV monitoring report requirements) and submit the monitoring report to the City of Temecula and the Pechanga Tribe. 44. Page 9 of 23 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation. The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 45. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 46. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 47. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 48. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 4.24 acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. 49. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 50. Page 10 of 23 Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 51. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 52. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 53. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 54. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 55. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 56. Page 11 of 23 Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 57. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. 58. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: • Decorative block for the perimeter of the project adjacent to a public right of way equal to 66 feet or larger as shown on the wall and fence plan. • Tubular steel fencing around the pool area, courtyards, dog park and northern and southern boundaries. 59. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 60. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 61. Landscaping Requirement for Phased Development. If any phase or area of the project site is not scheduled for development within six months of the completion of grading, the landscaping plans shall indicate it will be temporarily landscaped (which may include a requirement for regular irrigation) for dust and soil erosion control. 62. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 63. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 64. Community Wide Public Benefit. The applicant shall provide a cash payment in the amount of $750,000.00 to the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the first residential multi-family or commercial building permit. This payment will fulfill the requirements of the Growth Management Plan for the proposed project. 65. Fiscal Impact Analysis Covenant. The owner of record shall record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, which shall place future buyers of the residential dwelling units on notice of their obligation to pay the City the sum as provided in the Fiscal Impact Analysis on file with the City of Temecula. The covenant shall be recorded in the official records of the County of Riverside prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, and a copy of the covenant shall be filed with the office of the city clerk. 66. Page 12 of 23 Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 67. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 68. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 69. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 70. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 71. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated January 6, 2021, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 72. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated January 4, 2021 a copy of which is attached. 73. Geotechnical Compliance. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Geocon West transmittal dated March 8, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 74. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 75. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 76. Page 13 of 23 Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 77. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 78. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required; and shall be obtained: a. from Public Works for public offsite improvements; b. from the California Department of Transportation if encroaching within their right-of-way; and c. from Riverside County Flood Control & Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) if encroaching within their right-of-way. 79. Street Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit public street improvement plans for review and approval by Public Works. The plans shall be in compliance with Caltrans and City codes/standards; and shall include, but not limited to, plans and profiles showing existing topography, existing/proposed utilities, proposed centerline, top of curb and flowline grades. 80. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 81. Signing & Striping Plan. A signing & striping plan, designed by a registered civil engineer per the latest edition of Caltrans MUTCD standards, shall be included with the street improvement plans for approval. 82. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 83. Vehicular/Traffic Movement Restrictions. The developer shall comply with the following vehicular movements restrictions: a. The future access onto Date Street from Temecula Center Drive shall be restricted to a right-in/right-out/left-in movement. 84. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 85. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 86. Underlying Conditions. If, in applying these conditions, there is any conflict between the requirements of (i) the project’s Development Agreement, as amended to date, (ii) the Specific Plan, as amended to date, (iii) Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, and/or (iv) Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336, the prevailing requirement shall be determined as follows: a. First priority goes to the provisions of the Development Agreement b. Second priority goes to the provisions of the Specific Plan, then c. Third priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Tract Map No. 29639, then d. Fourth priority goes to the provisions of Tentative Parcel Map No. 36336 87. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Page 14 of 23 Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 88. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as RCFC&WCD and other affected agencies. 89. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 90. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 91. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 92. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 93. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 94. RCFC&WCD Approval. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 95. Page 15 of 23 Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 96. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 97. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 98. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 99. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 100. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 101. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 102. Certificate of Parcel Merger. The developer shall submit a Certificate of Parcel Merger for review and approval. 103. Traffic Signal Plans. The developer shall submit traffic signal plans for review and approval for the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive to include all necessary appurtenances for signal interconnect and fiber optic communications with the signals at the intersections of Ynez Road at Date Street and Ynez Road at Equity Drive. The plans shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and conform to the latest edition of the Caltrans Standard Plans and Specifications. 104. Page 16 of 23 Election Proceeding. The developer shall file a notice of intention with the Public Works Department to initiate election proceedings for acceptance of residential street lights into the respective Public Works maintenance programs. All costs associated with this process shall be borne by the developer. 105. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. The developer shall submit a Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for future Interstate 15 Northbound off ramp for review and approval, as shown on the approved Development Plan. 106. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 107. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 108. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 109. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 110. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Traffic Signal Installation. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the traffic signal at the intersection of Ynez Road and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive shall be operational. 111. Certificate of Parcel Merger. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall provide a recorded copy of the Certificate of Parcel Merger. 112. Irrevocable Offer of Dedication. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer shall provide a recorded copy of the Irrevocable Offer of Dedication for future Interstate 15 Northbound off ramp. 113. Construction of Street Improvements. All street improvement plans shall be approved by Public Works. The developer shall start construction of all public and/or private street improvements, as outlined below, in accordance to the City’s General Plan/Circulation Element and corresponding City standards. All street improvement designs shall provide adequate right-of-way and pavement transitions per Caltrans’ standards to join existing street improvements. a. Temecula Center Drive (Collector (2 lanes undivided) Standard No. 103A – 78’ R/W) to include dedication of half-width street right-of-way plus twelve feet, installation of half-width street improvements plus twelve feet, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). b. Temecula Center Drive along Assessor Parcel Number 916-400-061 (Collector (2 lanes undivided) Standard No. 103A – 78’ R/W) to include installation of half-width street improvements, paving, curb and gutter, sidewalk, streetlights, drainage facilities, signing and striping and utilities (including but not limited to water and sewer). 114. Page 17 of 23 Street Lights. a. Street Light Plan – Street lighting shall be designed in accordance with the latest City Standards and Specifications for LS-3 street light rates, and as determined by the City Engineer. b. Onsite and Offsite Street Lights Ownership and Maintenance – All proposed public and private street lights shall be designed in accordance with City approved standards and specifications, or as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The City shall have ownership and maintenance of all proposed public street lights and associated appurtenances, and shall be provided with adequate service points for power. The design shall be incorporated in the project’s street improvement plans or in a separate street light plan as determined and approved by the City Engineer. c. Streetlight Design as LS-3 Rate Lights – All new streetlights, other than traffic signal safety lights, shall be designed as LS-3 rate lights in accordance with approved City standards and specifications, and as determined by the City Engineer. d. Street Light Service Point Addressing – The developer shall coordinate with the PW Department and with Southern California Edison the assignment of addresses to required street light service points. Service points serving public streetlights shall be owned by the City and shall be located within public’s right of way or within duly dedicated public easements. 115. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 116. Street Light Energize Fee. Prior to the installation of street lights, the developer shall file an application and pay the appropriate fees for the dedication of arterial and residential street lights into the appropriate Public Works maintenance program. 117. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 118. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 119. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 120. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 121. Written Disclosure. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of Public Works and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 122. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Page 18 of 23 Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 123. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 124. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 125. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 126. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 127. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 128. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 129. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 130. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 131. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 132. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 133. Page 19 of 23 Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 134. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Te mecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 135. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 136. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration. Fire flow given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 137. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 138. Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 139. Turning Radius (Culdesac). Maximum cul-de-sac- length shall not exceed 1320 feet. Minimum turning radius on any cul-de-sac shall be 45 feet for Multi-Family dwelling tracts (CFC Chapter 5 along with Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 140. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 65,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 141. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 142. Page 20 of 23 Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 143. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. The fire service line is separate from the domestic water line. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 144. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. A set of plans and hydraulic calculations are required for each individual building, and a permit will be issued for each individual building. Plans will be submitted electronically, paper plans are no longer accepted. Plans will be submitted but not approved by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 145. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. A set of plans are required to be submitted for each individual building and a permit will be issued for each individual building. Plans will be submitted electronically ad paper plans are no longer accepted. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted but not approved prior to the issuance of building permit. 146. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Address Directory (Multi-Family). A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 147. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 148. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 149. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Single family residences and multi-family residential units shall have 4-inch letters and/or numbers, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 150. Site Plan. The applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5). 151. Page 21 of 23 File Format Requirements. A simple plot plan and a simple floor plan, each as an electronic file of the .DWG format, must be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Contact Fire Prevention for approval of alternative file formats which may be acceptable 152. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 153. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 154. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 155. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 156. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 157. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 158. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 159. Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 160. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial grade. 161. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 48 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 162. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 163. Page 22 of 23 Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a “call-out only” feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 164. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 165. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be award of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 166. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 167. Page 23 of 23 ,,. JASON E. UHLEY General Manager-Chief Engineer 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rctlood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRRE,CE\VED January 6, 2021 JAN \ 1 202\ CITY OF TEM ECULA .. COM M UNITY DEVELOPMENT City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 235955 Attention: Scott Cooper Re: PA 20-1371, APN 916-400-042 and 916-400-058 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees ( development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received December 14, 2020. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ~ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. □ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. □ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. .. City of Temecula Re: PA 20-1371, APN 916-400-042 and 916-400-058 - 2 - January 6, 2021 235955 This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (□Murrieta Valley D Temecula Valley IZl Santa Gertrudis Valley □Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, Santa Gertrudis Valley Harveston/Date Street Stage 2 Storm Drain. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. D The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORM ATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLO MR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, ~de~ DEBORAH DECHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy SLJ:blm January 4, 2020 Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Subject: Solana Winchester DP: A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 350- unit apartment community located within the Residential Overlay of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. Location: The terminus of Date St. approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Rd. APN: 916-400-042 & 916-400-058 Dear Scott Cooper: The subject project will require sewer services from EMWD. The details of said service connection points will be further detailed in a separate document, known as EMWD’s Design Conditions (DC), formerly known as Plan of Service (POS), to be developed by the project proponent and approved by EMWD. The DC evaluation will identify the potential requirement to construct new facilities, such as on-site and offsite sewer pipelines, facilities relocation related to conflicts with proposed improvements, (such as relocating existing facilities, street realignments, street vacations, proposed medians and additional soil import), as well as associated easements and/or Right-of-Way Permits to adequately serve the project demands. The subject project is an active project with EMWD’s Development Services Department, with a water and sewer Work Order Number 16004 and Project Record Number WS2019-805. The subject project was part of an approved master DC project which has been closed. A sewer capacity evaluation confirming the proposed demands versus the projected demands would need to be submitted for review prior to approval for connection to the existing public sewer system. We would recommend the subject project request a due diligence meeting at no cost to the developer, to further detail the requirements for the aforementioned phased DC. Scott Cooper January 4, 2021 Page 2 If you have questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at (951) 928-3777, extension 4468 or by email at El-hagem@emwd.org. Sincerely, Maroun El-Hage, MPA, MS, PE Principal Civil Engineer Development Services Department Eastern Municipal Water District MEH:lm Attachment(s)/Enclosure(s): Copy of Public Notice, Map of Service Inquires c: 9,028 1,128 © EMWD APN: 916-400-058 Solana Winchester DP A part of Harveston Specific Plan Water mains fall under Rancho California Water District's jurisdiction. By Notes SCALE 1: 938 7,505 Feet EMWD Staff GIS data shown is for informational purposes only, is subject to change without notice and may not be suitable for legal, engineering, construction, or surveying purposes. Information should be reviewed against reliable sources to ascertain its usability. Eastern Municipal Water District assumes no liability for any incorrect results, any lost profits and direct, special, indirect or consequential damages to any party, arising out of or in connection with the use or the inability to use the data hereon or the services. Legend 12/31/2020 Solana Winchester DP - APN 916-400-058: a part of Harveston Specific Plan Map Produced 0 : Wtr Main As Built CIP Wtr Main Abandoned Swr Interagency Tie Swr Main As Built, Collection As Built, Distribution As Built, Effluent Force As Built, Influent Force As Built, Transmission CIP, Collection CIP, Effluent Force CIP, Influent Force CIP, Transmission Swr Main Abandoned Swr Main Murrieta Rcl Interagency Tie Rcl Main AS Built CIP Rcl Main Abandoned Streets Wtr Pump Station Wtr Pump Station Polygon Wtr Tank Wtr Well Wtr Treatment Plant Wtr Treatment Plant Polygon MWD Connections MWD Canals Swr Lift Station Swr Lift Station Polygon Swr Treatment Plant Rcl Tank Rcl Pump Station Rcl Pump Station Polygon Recycled Ponds Tertiary Water Out of Compliance Water EMWD District Boundary EMWD Main Office EMWD Sites Highway Service Inquiry Project No. 07878-52-01 August 1, 2007 Project No. T2652-22-15 March 8, 2021 Leighton and Associates, Inc. 41715 Enterprise Circle North, Suite 103 Temecula, California 92590-5661 Attention: Mr. Simon Saiid, GE Subject: CONCLUDING COMMENTS GEOTECHNICAL THIRD-PARTY REVIEW (PA20-1371) PROPOSED SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA References: 1) Addendum Report #2 – Response to Peer Review Comments Solana Winchester Hills, Portion of PM 36336, Lots 9 and C, City of Temecula, California, Project 12539.001 by Leighton & Associates, Inc., dated March 3, 2021. 2) Addendum Report #1 – Response to Peer Review Comments Solana Winchester Hills, Portion of PM 36336, Lots 9 and C, City of Temecula, California, Project 12539.001 by Leighton & Associates, Inc., dated February 5, 2021. 3) Geotechnical Third-Party Review (PA20-1371) Proposed Solana Winchester Hills, Temecula, California, Project T2652-22-15, prepared by Geocon West, Inc., dated December 23, 2020. 4) Geotechnical Update Report, Solana Winchester Hills, Temecula, California, prepared by Leighton & Associates, Inc., Project 12539.001, dated January 21, 2020. Dear Mr. Saiid: In accordance with the request of Mr. Scott Cooper with the City of Temecula, Geocon West, Inc. (Geocon) has completed a third-party review of the Addendum Report #2 (Reference 1) dated March 3, 2021 prepared by Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leighton). The purpose of the review is to present our opinion regarding the suitability of the study, conclusions, and recommendations provided within the referenced document. REVIEW The Leighton & Associates, Inc. (Leighton) Addendum Report #2 provided additional responses to peer review comments by Geocon presented in Reference 1 based on our review of the geotechnical updated for the project prepared by Leighton (Reference 4). Leighton’s response included direct responses to Geocon Project No. T2652-22-15 - 2 - March 8, 2021 each of Geocon’s comments and a revised report for the project. We have accepted Leighton’s Addendum #1 response as adequately addressing the remaining Comments 2, 7, 8, and 9. CONCLUSIONS Based on our review of the referenced document, the referenced geotechnical reports adequately address the project design as presented. Should you have any questions regarding this letter, or if we may be of further service, please contact the undersigned at your convenience. Very truly yours, GEOCON WEST, INC. Lisa A. Battiato CEG 2316 Jelisa Thomas Adams GE 3092 LAB:JTA:JV:hd Distribution: (pdf) City of Temecula Planning Department, Attn: Scott Cooper 555 W. Beech Street, Suite 460  San Diego, California 92101  PHONE: 619 718 9500  FAX: 619 718 9508 21075kal WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 19454.050.001 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BERKELEY A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY DEBBIE M. KERN DAVID DOEZEMA KEVIN FEENEY LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RABE GREGORY D. SOO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY TIM BRETZ SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA MEMORANDUM To: Scott Cooper, Associate Planner II City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Objective In accordance with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.’s (KMA’s) agreement for consulting services with the City of Temecula (City), KMA has undertaken a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for the Solana Winchester Hills project (Project) proposed by Reylenn Properties (Developer). The Project will be located north of State Route 79 (SR-79), east of Interstate 15 (I-15), south of Temecula Center Drive, and west of Ynez Road, within Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan (Specific Plan). The Project is planned to include 350 residential units consisting of townhomes and flats. This FIA prepared by KMA evaluated the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the proposed Project over a 20-year period. The 20-year period begins at the completion and occupancy of the Project’s first residential units, which is assumed to be Fiscal Year (FY) 2023, and ends in FY 2042. B. Methodology In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: • Reviewed background materials and planning/zoning documents relevant to the Project and the Site. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 2 21075kal 19454.050.001 • Reviewed the City’s FY 2021 General Fund Operating Budget to understand the City’s fiscal condition and revenue/expenditure parameters. • Interviewed key City staff regarding cost-of-service structure and approach to provide services to the Project. • Collected and reviewed demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. • Collected and reviewed residential market data to substantiate inputs provided by the Developer. • Estimated recurring annual revenues and municipal service expenditures as a result of the Project. C. Report Organization Following this introduction: • Section II presents a summary of the KMA key findings. • Section III provides a projection of the fiscal impact of the Project on the City’s General Fund over the 20-year period. • Finally, Section IV presents limiting conditions pertaining to this report. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Project – 20-Year Fiscal Impact • The Project is estimated to yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund, each year, over the projected 20-year period. • The major revenue categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include indirect (off-site) sales tax, Measure S revenues, property tax, property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fee (VLF), and franchise fees. • The major expenditure categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include Police, Fire, Public Works, Community Development, and General Government. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 3 21075kal 19454.050.001 • The Project’s fiscal impact is estimated at negative $38,000, or negative $110 per unit, in stabilized Year 2 (FY 2024 dollars) and is projected to reach negative $338,000, or negative $964 per unit, in Year 20 (FY 2042 dollars), as shown in Table II-1 below. Table II-1: Fiscal Impact of Project FY 2024 FY 2042 General Fund Revenues $412,000 $635,000 General Fund Expenditures ($450,000) ($973,000) Annual Net Fiscal Impact to City Deficit per Unit per Year Revenue to Expense Ratio ($38,000) ($110) 0.92 ($338,000) ($964) 0.65 III. 20-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT A. Overview of Methodology This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed Project. The detailed KMA 20-year fiscal impact model is provided in Appendices A and B of this report and summarized below. Demographic and Economic Overview Table III-1 presents the findings of the KMA review of demographic and economic factors for the City. The data consist of population, number of housing units, and total jobs. More detail is presented in Appendix A, Table A-1. Table III-1: Demographic and Economic Overview, City of Temecula 2020 Estimate Population 111,970 Housing Units 36,550 Jobs 54,313 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 4 21075kal 19454.050.001 Overview of City General Fund Budget Table III-2 below provides an overview of the City’s FY 2021 Revised General Fund budget. A more detailed analysis can be found in Appendix A, Table A-2. As shown, the City was operating at a net surplus of $218,000 in FY 2021. Appendix A, Tables A-3 and A-4 also show the department revenues and expenditures used to calculate the per capita impacts to the General Fund from the development of the proposed Project. The revenues shown are strictly departmental revenues and exclude such revenues as property and sales tax, which are estimated based on projected increases in assessed value and taxable sales as a result of development of the Project, respectively. The expenditures used in this analysis reflect a deduction for citizen/user payments in the form of Charges for Services to yield net (unreimbursed) expenditures. B. Key Assumptions – Project As shown in Table III-3 below, the Project will include 340 apartments and 10 townhomes. A more detailed description of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-2. Table III-3: Project Description Apartments (Flats) – Rental 340 Units Townhomes – Rental 10 Units Total Units 350 Units Table III-4 below presents the assumed absorption schedule for the Project. The Developer anticipates that for each product type, the first occupancy will occur during FY 2023 until stabilized occupancy is achieved by FY 2024. A more detailed analysis of the projected annual absorption of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-3. Table III-2: City of Temecula, Mid-Year FY 2021 Revised General Fund Budget General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Net Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio $79,536,000 ($79,318,000) $218,000 1.00 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 5 21075kal 19454.050.001 C. Key Assumptions to Fiscal Impact Projection General Approach Assumptions used in the FIA are based on an assessment of future circumstances regarding population, employment, property valuation, and taxable sales. Table III-5 below provides a summary of the key assumptions used in this analysis. Table III-5: Key Assumptions Population Resident Equivalents Residential Value 2.0-3.0 0.33 $330,000 - $350,000 persons per unit employees per resident per unit (FY 2021) (1) (1) KMA estimate. Based on review of recent multi-family residential building sales in Temecula and North San Diego County. The FIA also estimates other General Fund revenues and expenditures based on a modified per capita measure known as “resident equivalents.” The approach combines residents and employees to form a single service population. As summarized below, the resident equivalent approach weighs an employee as 0.33 residents, such that three employees are viewed as having the same impact as one resident. Table III-6: Total Resident Equivalents Total Population Total Employment Total Population + Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (1) City of Temecula 111,970 54,313 166,283 129,893 Solana Winchester Hills Project 675 0 675 675 (1) Assumes a resident equivalent factor of 0.33 (three employees have approximately the same impact as one resident). Table III-4: Anticipated Schedule of Development (1) FY 2023 FY 2024 Total Apartments (Flats) – Rental 223 117 340 Townhomes – Rental 7 3 10 Total Units 230 120 350 (1) Source: Developer, January 26, 2021. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 6 21075kal 19454.050.001 General Fund Revenues This section discusses the recurring General Fund revenue assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the proposed Project. Annual recurring revenues generated by the Project, such as Property Tax and Sales and Use Tax, were estimated based on assumed real estate market factors such as market values/rents for the residential units. One-time revenues, such as Development Impact Fees and building permits used to offset one-time City costs, were not evaluated in this FIA. To reflect pre-COVID-19 pandemic operating levels, Franchise Fees; Licenses and Permits; Fines and Forfeitures; and other revenues were estimated by using a three (3)-year historical average of actual revenue received from FY 2018 to FY 2020. The historical average figure was then divided by the applicable service population to estimate a per capita or “per resident equivalent” factor. This factor was then applied to the number of new residents anticipated for the Project. As shown in Table III-7 below, KMA applied the following escalation factors to estimate the annual General Fund revenues to the City over a 20-year period. The annual escalation factors were based on KMA’s review of recent historical valuation trends in the City, as well as discussions with the City’s Finance Department. Table III-7: Annual Revenue Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Assessed Value (1) Pre-Build-out Post-Build-out Sales Tax Measure S (2) Special Tax (Measure C) (3) Franchise Fees Other General Fund Revenues 5.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 1.5% 2.5% (1) Reflects assumed market escalation. (2) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (3) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. General Fund Expenditures This section discusses the recurring annual General Fund expenditure assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the Project at build-out. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 7 21075kal 19454.050.001 Annual recurring expenditures, including Fire, Public Works, and City Council, were estimated by applying a per capita or “per resident equivalent” cost estimate to the number of new residents anticipated from build-out of the Project, with the exception of Police. To estimate Police expenditures, KMA applied the Project’s pro rata share of one (1) new police officer, at an approximate annual cost of approximately $352,000, per 1,000 population added to the City. The City’s Asset Management Fund, a direct interfund transfer from the Measure S Fund into four (4) separate Asset Management Funds (Street Replacement Fund, Vehicles/Equipment Fleet Replacement Fund, Facilities Replacement Fund, and Technology Replacement Fund), was also included in addition to the General Fund expenditure analysis. Annual escalation factors for each major expenditure category were estimated by KMA based on five- year financial projections for the General Fund presented in the City’s Budget. As shown in Table III-8, General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase at escalation rates ranging between 2.0% and 5.0% per year. KMA also applied a marginal cost adjustment to each expenditure category to reflect that General Fund expenditures do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services, such as overhead and administrative functions within City government. As shown in Table III-8, the marginal cost adjustments assumed by KMA ranged between 0% (no adjustment to per capita assumptions) to 100% (expenditures not impacted by the Project). To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 8 21075kal 19454.050.001 Table III-8: Annual Expenditure Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Marginal Cost Impact Adjustment (1) Police Public Works – Land Development, Public Works, etc. Fire Public Works – Parks & Maintenance Community Development Finance City Clerk Retiree Medical Contribution City Attorney City Council Community Support PERS Replacement Benefit Property Tax Administration Asset Management Fund General Government 5.00% 2.50% 5.00% 2.50% 2.75% 2.75% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.75% 2.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.50% 2.50% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 90.0% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 100.0% 30.0% 0.0% 40.0% (1) Reflects adjustment to expenditure categories that do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between population growth and demand for municipal services. For example, an increase in population will demand 95% of Police municipal services expenditures per net new resident equivalent. D. Annual Fiscal Impact to General Fund General Fund Revenues Table III-9 summarizes the KMA estimate of recurring General Fund revenues during the Project’s build- out year (FY 2024). As shown, Sales Tax and Measure S revenues, in the form of off-site resident spending captured within the City, represent the largest components of General Fund revenues as a result of the Project. The Project’s 675 new residents are expected to generate $203,100 of net new revenues (in the form of Sales Tax/Measure S revenues) to the City in FY 2024. This represents about 49.4% of total revenues generated by the Project. Property Tax and Property Tax In-Lieu of Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues are the next largest source of General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project’s 350 residential units. In FY 2024, the Project is projected to generate approximately $65,300 in Property Tax and $74,100 in Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF revenues. In combination, these sources represent 33.9% of the total General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 9 21075kal 19454.050.001 The other sources, including Franchise Fees, Property Transfer Tax, Measure C, Franchise Fees, and all other revenue sources, are anticipated to account for the remaining 16.7% of General Fund revenues generated by the Project. General Fund Expenditures As shown in Table III-10, the total annual General Fund expenditures to provide services to the Project are estimated at $450,100 in FY 2024. Major expenditure categories were estimated based on projections from current service levels. As shown, the Project’s pro rata cost for Police represents the largest of the Project-generated expenditures at $261,600, or 58.1% of total expenditures. Fire services represent the second largest expenditure at $55,000, or 12.2% of the total Project- generated expenditures. The remaining departmental expenditures, including, but not limited to, Public Works, Asset Management Fund, and General Government, account for a combined $133,500, or 29.7% of total expenditures. Table III-9: General Fund Revenues in FY 2024 Total % of Total Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax – Resident Spending Measure S – Resident Spending (1) Measure C (2) Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In – Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues (Rounded) $65,300 $74,100 $7,200 $106,900 $96,200 $19,700 $20,400 $1,500 $4,100 $400 $14,400 $1,400 $411,600 15.9% 18.0% 1.7% 26.0% 23.4% 4.8% 5.0% 0.4% 1.0% 0.1% 3.5% 0.3% 100.0% (1) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (2) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 10 21075kal 19454.050.001 Table III-10: General Fund Expenditures in FY 2024 Total % of Total Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works – Land Development, etc. Public Works – Park Maintenance Fire (1) Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures (Rounded) $261,600 $2,000 $100 $16,400 $5,200 $3,200 $12,000 $17,800 $35,600 $23,400 $55,000 $400 $600 $0 $16,800 $450,100 58.1% 0.4% 0.0% 3.6% 1.2% 0.7% 2.7% 4.0% 7.9% 5.2% 12.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 3.7% 100.0% (1) Expenditures are net of the County Structure Fire Protection Tax. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 11 21075kal 19454.050.001 Annual Fiscal Impact Comparison of the annual revenues and annual expenditures generated by the Project indicates that it will yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund each year after project stabilization over the 20-year period. As shown in Table III-11, the Project’s net fiscal impact is estimated at negative $38,000, or negative $110 per unit, at build-out in Year 2 (FY 2024). The Project’s net fiscal impact reaches negative $338,000, or negative $964 per unit, by Year 20 (FY 2042). A more detailed analysis is presented in Appendix B. Table III-11: Annual General Fund Impact Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues (1) General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year (2) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 2023 $305,000 $284,000 $21,000 $60 1.07 2024 $412,000 $450,000 ($38,000) ($110) 0.92 2025 $421,000 $469,000 ($48,000) ($137) 0.90 2026 $431,000 $489,000 ($58,000) ($166) 0.88 2027 $442,000 $511,000 ($69,000) ($196) 0.86 2028 $453,000 $533,000 ($80,000) ($228) 0.85 2029 $464,000 $556,000 ($92,000) ($263) 0.83 2030 $475,000 $580,000 ($105,000) ($300) 0.82 2031 $486,000 $605,000 ($119,000) ($339) 0.80 2032 $498,000 $631,000 ($133,000) ($380) 0.79 2033 $510,000 $659,000 ($149,000) ($424) 0.77 2034 $523,000 $688,000 ($165,000) ($471) 0.76 2035 $536,000 $718,000 ($182,000) ($520) 0.75 2036 $549,000 $749,000 ($200,000) ($574) 0.73 2037 $562,000 $783,000 ($221,000) ($630) 0.72 2038 $576,000 $817,000 ($241,000) ($689) 0.71 2039 $590,000 $853,000 ($263,000) ($752) 0.69 2040 $605,000 $891,000 ($286,000) ($818) 0.68 2041 $620,000 $931,000 ($311,000) ($889) 0.67 2042 $635,000 $973,000 ($338,000) ($964) 0.65 (1) Includes Project-generated Measure S revenues. (2) Represents annual General Fund impact per unit based on anticipated annual absorption for the Project. Full build-out of the Project does not occur until FY 2024. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 12 21075kal 19454.050.001 IV. LIMITING CONDITONS 1. The KMA analysis is based, in part, on data provided by secondary sources, such as state and local governments, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. While KMA believes that these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. 2. A projection of economic impacts is inherently based on judgment. While KMA considers these projections reasonable for planning purposes, it is the nature of forecasting that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes may be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, may require review or revision of this report. 3. The projections of future economic impact do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and national recession that is likely to follow. 4. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, Project-specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 5. Any estimates of revenue or cost projections are based on the best Project-specific and fiscal data available at this time as well as experience with comparable projects. They are not intended to be projections of actual future performance of any specific project. 6. Revenue estimates are based on the assumption that sufficient market support exists for the proposed uses and that the Project will achieve industry standard productivity levels. 7. KMA assumes that all applicable laws and governmental regulations in place as of the date of this document will remain unchanged throughout the projection period of our analysis. In the event that this does not hold true, i.e., if any tax rates change, the analysis would need to be revised. 8. Value estimates assume that any necessary entitlements or zoning changes for development can be obtained in a reasonable time frame. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula September 20, 2021 Subject: Solana Winchester Hills – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 13 21075kal 19454.050.001 9. Value estimates assume that property titles are good and marketable; no title search has been made, nor has KMA attempted to determine property ownership. The value estimates are given without regard to any questions of boundaries, encumbrances, liens, or encroachments. 10. Property tax projections reflect KMA's understanding of the assessment and tax apportionment procedures employed by the County. The County procedures are subject to change as a reflection of policy revisions or legislative mandate. While we believe our estimates to be reasonable, taxable values resulting from actual appraisals may vary from the amounts assumed in the projections. 11. No assurances are provided by KMA as to the certainty of the projected tax revenues shown in this document. Actual revenues may be higher or lower than what has been projected and are subject to valuation changes resulting from new developments or transfers of ownership not specifically identified herein, actual resolution of outstanding appeals, future filing of appeals, or the non- payment of taxes due. 12. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective, new, or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). 13. KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor to the City and does not assume any fiduciary duty hereunder, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty to the City pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act with respect to the services provided hereunder and any information and material contained in KMA’s work product. 14. The City shall discuss any such information and material contained in KMA’s work product with any and all internal and/or external advisors and experts, including its own municipal advisors, that it deems appropriate before acting on the information and material. attachments APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS Demographic Profile and City of Temecula General Fund Budget DEMOGRAPHICS DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - CITY OF TEMECULA, 2020 ESTIMATES (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Population Population 111,970 Average Household Size 3.24 Jobs (2)54,313 II.Housing Units Single-Family 30,001 82.1% Multi-Family 6,387 17.5% Mobile Homes 162 0.4% Total 36,550 100.0% III.Occupied Units 34,511 IV.Percent Vacant 5.6% (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) TABLE A-1 2020 Estimates U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL FUND BUDGET - FY 2021 OPERATING BUDGET SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Revised Budget I.Revenues Property Tax $9,226,610 Sales and Use Tax $36,177,000 (Less) Sales Tax Sharing Agreement ($1,245,053) Franchise Fees $3,562,656 Transient Occupancy Tax $2,620,575 Special Tax (Measure C)$1,880,264 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges $4,539,248 Fines and Forfeitures $419,774 Use of Money and Property $30,389 Intergovernmental Revenues $8,857,073 Reimbursements $3,033,843 Miscellaneous $187,702 Subtotal - Revenues $69,290,081 Add: Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF/CARES Act $4,301,409 Add: Operating Transfers In - Measure S $5,944,780 Total Revenues $79,536,270 II.Expenditures City Council $592,662 Community Support $125,000 City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Emergency Management $421,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 Finance $2,600,964 Human Resources $1,160,678 Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 CIP Admin $2,389,172 Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 Police $35,990,469 Fire $10,406,302 Animal Control $450,177 Non-Departmental $1,193,629 Total Expenditures $79,317,557 III.Total Surplus/(Deficit)$218,713 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.00 TABLE A-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Revenues FY 2021 Revised Budget I.Revenues - Included in Analysis A.Taxes and Franchises Property Tax $9,226,610 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Sales Tax (1)$34,931,947 projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development Franchise Fees $3,562,656 projected based on population Special Tax (Measure C)$1,880,264 based on residential units and commercial acreage developed Subtotal - Taxes and Franchises $49,601,477 B.Business Licenses $255,000 projected based on population and employment C.Fines and Forfeitures $419,774 projected based on population and employment D.Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $8,801,658 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Vehicle License Fees $55,415 projected based on population Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenues $8,857,073 E.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $2,639,716 projected based on population F.Miscellaneous $34,617 projected based on population and employment Total Revenues - Included in Analysis $61,807,657 II.Revenues - Excluded from Analysis A.Transient Occupancy Tax $2,620,575 hotel use not planned as part of Project B.Reimbursements Capital Improvement Program $2,435,827 independent of projected incremental development Pechanga IGA $356,567 independent of projected incremental development Other Reimbursements $333,449 independent of projected incremental development Subtotal - Reimbursements $3,125,843 C.Development Impact Fees $18,000 independent of projected incremental development D.Use of Money and Property Lease/Rental Income $148,089 independent of projected incremental development Investment Interest ($117,700)independent of projected incremental development Other $4,941 Subtotal - Use of Money and Property $35,330 E.Operating Transfers In Measure S Fund $5,944,780 independent of incremental development COPS $279,185 independent of incremental development Fire Station 73 Repayment $0 independent of incremental development CARES Act (State)$1,382,508 independent of incremental development Subtotal - Operating Transfers In $7,606,473 Total Revenues - Excluded from Analysis $13,406,221 III.Charges for Services A.Deducted from Community Development Building $1,671,009 Development Fees $159,780 Planning $542,722 Total Deducted from Community Development $2,373,511 B.Deducted from Public Works Land Development $1,006,805 Public Works $4,750 Parks Maintenance $1,000 Total Deducted from Public Works $1,012,555 C.Deducted from Police $149,557 D.Deducted from Fire $786,769 Total Charges for Services $4,322,392 IV.Total General Fund Revenues $79,536,270 (1)Includes Sales Tax Sharing Agreement. TABLE A-3 Comments Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 16 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Net After Expenditures Deduction of FY 2021 Charges for Services Revised Budget (Table A-3) I.Expenditures Included in Analysis City Council $592,662 $0 $592,662 Community Support $125,000 $0 $125,000 General Government City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Human Resources $1,160,678 Emergency Management $421,310 Subtotal General Government $4,886,310 $0 $4,886,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 $0 $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 $0 $961,146 Finance Finance $2,600,964 Animal Control $450,177 Subtotal Finance $3,051,141 $0 $3,051,141 Community Development Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Subtotal Community Development $6,327,008 ($2,373,511) $3,953,497 Public Works Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 Subtotal Public Works $8,075,259 ($1,011,555) $7,063,704 Public Works Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 ($1,000) $4,007,007 Fire $10,406,302 ($786,769) $9,619,533 Non-Departmental Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 Property Tax Administration $94,195 Subtotal Non-Departmental $1,193,629 $0 $1,193,629 Add: Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 Total Expenditures - Included in Analysis $43,937,916 $39,765,081 II.Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis Police (1)$35,990,469 ($149,557) $35,840,912 CIP Administration $2,389,172 $0 $2,389,172 Total Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis $38,379,641 $38,230,084 III.Total General Fund Expenditures $82,317,557 $77,995,165 (1) Per City; police expenditures included in analysis reflect project pro rata share of one new police officer per 1,000 population. TABLE A-4 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 17 APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS 20-Year Projection SUMMARY OF ANNUAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT GENERATED BY PROJECT SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2023 $305,000 $284,000 $21,000 $60 1.07 2 2024 $412,000 $450,000 ($38,000)($110)0.92 3 2025 $421,000 $469,000 ($48,000)($137)0.90 4 2026 $431,000 $489,000 ($58,000)($166)0.88 5 2027 $442,000 $511,000 ($69,000)($196)0.86 6 2028 $453,000 $533,000 ($80,000)($228)0.85 7 2029 $464,000 $556,000 ($92,000)($263)0.83 8 2030 $475,000 $580,000 ($105,000)($300)0.82 9 2031 $486,000 $605,000 ($119,000)($339)0.80 10 2032 $498,000 $631,000 ($133,000)($380)0.79 11 2033 $510,000 $659,000 ($149,000)($424)0.77 12 2034 $523,000 $688,000 ($165,000)($471)0.76 13 2035 $536,000 $718,000 ($182,000)($520)0.75 14 2036 $549,000 $749,000 ($200,000)($574)0.73 15 2037 $562,000 $783,000 ($221,000)($630)0.72 16 2038 $576,000 $817,000 ($241,000)($689)0.71 17 2039 $590,000 $853,000 ($263,000)($752)0.69 18 2040 $605,000 $891,000 ($286,000)($818)0.68 19 2041 $620,000 $931,000 ($311,000)($889)0.67 20 2042 $635,000 $973,000 ($338,000)($964)0.65 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio TABLE B-1 Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed to Date Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 18 PROJECT DESCRIPTION SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Site Area 15.10 Acres II.Density 23 Units/Acre III.Unit Mix A.Apartments (Flats) - Rental One Bedroom 144 Units Two Bedroom 169 Units Three Bedroom 27 Units Subtotal - Apartments 340 Units B.Townhomes - Rental Three Bedroom 10 Units Subtotal - Townhomes 10 Units C.Total Units 350 Units IV.Parking Type Tuck-under/Townhome Garages Spaces 647 Spaces Parking Ratio 1.85 Spaces/Unit TABLE B-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 19 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ABSORPTION (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental 340 Units 223 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 223 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 340 II.Townhomes - Rental 10 Units 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 7 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 III.Total Cumulative Units 350 Units 230 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 (1)Per Developer, January 26, 2021. Does not assume vacancy. TABLE B-3 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 20 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL POPULATION SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Total Resident I.Residential Factor (1)Persons/Unit (2)Population A.Apartments 340 Units 5.0%2.00 646 B.Townhomes 10 Units 5.0%3.00 29 C.Total/Average 350 Units 5.0%1.93 675 D.Total Population 675 (1)KMA assumption reflecting average vacancy rate, based on typical lender underwriting criteria for residential uses. (2)KMA assumption based on industry standard household size by unit type. TABLE B-4 Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 21 POPULATION ESTIMATES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Factor Per Unit FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental 340 Units 5.0%2.00 424 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 II.Townhomes - Rental 10 Units 5.0%3.00 20 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 III.Total Population 444 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 22 POPULATION ESTIMATES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons Factor Per Unit I.Apartments - Rental 340 Units 5.0%2.00 II.Townhomes - Rental 10 Units 5.0%3.00 III.Total Population TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 646 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 29 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 23 ESTIMATE OF ASSESSED VALUE (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Assessed Value I.Residential Per Unit A.Apartments - Rental 340 Units $330,000 B.Townhomes - Rental 10 Units $350,000 C.Total/Average 350 Units $331,000 (1)Based on a review of sales of multi-family buildings and townhomes in the City. TABLE B-6 Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 24 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $81,133,000 $127,452,000 $130,001,000 $132,601,000 $135,253,000 $137,958,000 $140,717,000 $143,531,000 $146,402,000 $149,330,000 II.Townhomes - Rental $2,701,000 $3,971,000 $4,050,000 $4,131,000 $4,214,000 $4,298,000 $4,384,000 $4,472,000 $4,561,000 $4,652,000 III.Total Assessed Value $83,834,000 $131,423,000 $134,051,000 $136,732,000 $139,467,000 $142,256,000 $145,101,000 $148,003,000 $150,963,000 $153,982,000 (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build- out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 25 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Assessed Value (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build- out. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $152,316,000 $155,363,000 $158,470,000 $161,639,000 $164,872,000 $168,170,000 $171,533,000 $174,964,000 $178,463,000 $182,032,000 $4,745,000 $4,840,000 $4,937,000 $5,036,000 $5,136,000 $5,239,000 $5,344,000 $5,451,000 $5,560,000 $5,671,000 $157,061,000 $160,203,000 $163,407,000 $166,675,000 $170,008,000 $173,409,000 $176,877,000 $180,415,000 $184,023,000 $187,703,000 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 26 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $40,323 $63,344 $64,610 $65,903 $67,221 $68,565 $69,936 $71,335 $72,762 $74,217 II.Townhomes - Rental $1,342 $1,974 $2,013 $2,053 $2,094 $2,136 $2,179 $2,223 $2,267 $2,312 III.Total Property Tax Revenues $41,665 $65,318 $66,623 $67,956 $69,315 $70,701 $72,115 $73,558 $75,029 $76,529 TABLE B-8 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 27 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97% I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Property Tax Revenues TABLE B-8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $75,701 $77,215 $78,760 $80,335 $81,941 $83,580 $85,252 $86,957 $88,696 $90,470 $2,358 $2,405 $2,454 $2,503 $2,553 $2,604 $2,656 $2,709 $2,763 $2,818 $78,059 $79,620 $81,214 $82,838 $84,494 $86,184 $87,908 $89,666 $91,459 $93,288 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 28 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $45,729 $71,836 $73,273 $74,738 $76,233 $77,758 $79,313 $80,899 $82,517 $84,167 II.Townhomes - Rental $1,522 $2,238 $2,283 $2,328 $2,375 $2,422 $2,471 $2,521 $2,571 $2,622 III.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues $47,251 $74,074 $75,556 $77,066 $78,608 $80,180 $81,784 $83,420 $85,088 $86,789 TABLE B-9 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 29 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues TABLE B-9 OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $85,850 $87,568 $89,319 $91,105 $92,927 $94,786 $96,682 $98,615 $100,588 $102,599 $2,674 $2,728 $2,783 $2,838 $2,895 $2,953 $3,012 $3,072 $3,134 $3,196 $88,524 $90,296 $92,102 $93,943 $95,822 $97,739 $99,694 $101,687 $103,722 $105,795 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 30 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $44,623 $7,010 $7,150 $7,293 $7,439 $7,588 $7,739 $7,894 $8,052 $8,213 II.Townhomes - Rental $1,486 $218 $223 $227 $232 $236 $241 $246 $251 $256 III.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $46,109 $7,228 $7,373 $7,520 $7,671 $7,824 $7,980 $8,140 $8,303 $8,469 (1)Assumes property turnover occurs after build-out. TABLE B-10 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 31 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX (1) SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10% I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues (1)Assumes property turnover occurs after build-out. TABLE B-10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $8,377 $8,545 $8,716 $8,890 $9,068 $9,249 $9,434 $9,623 $9,815 $10,012 $261 $266 $272 $277 $283 $288 $294 $300 $306 $312 $8,638 $8,811 $8,988 $9,167 $9,351 $9,537 $9,728 $9,923 $10,121 $10,324 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 32 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPENDING BY RESIDENTS SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA 2020 2020 Apartments -Townhomes - Rental Rental I.Estimate of Household Income Average Rent $2,500 (1)$3,565 (2) Total Annual Costs $30,000 $42,780 % of Income Spent on Housing 30%30% Annual Income Required $100,000 $143,000 II.Number of Households Total Number of Residential Units 340 10 Occupancy Rate 95%95% Total Number of Full-Time Equivalent Households 323 10 III.Aggregate Household Income $33,659,000 (1)KMA estimate. (2)Per Developer, January 26, 2021. TABLE B-11 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename i: \Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 33 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $65,300 $102,600 $105,600 $108,800 $112,100 $115,400 $118,900 $122,500 $126,100 $129,900 II.Townhomes - Rental $2,900 $4,300 $4,400 $4,600 $4,700 $4,900 $5,000 $5,200 $5,300 $5,500 III.Total Sales Tax Revenues $68,200 $106,900 $110,000 $113,400 $116,800 $120,300 $123,900 $127,700 $131,400 $135,400 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 34 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Sales Tax Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 G 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $133,800 $137,800 $142,000 $146,200 $150,600 $155,100 $159,800 $164,600 $169,500 $174,600 $5,600 $5,800 $6,000 $6,100 $6,300 $6,500 $6,700 $6,900 $7,100 $7,300 $139,400 $143,600 $148,000 $152,300 $156,900 $161,600 $166,500 $171,500 $176,600 $181,900 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 35 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $58,800 $92,300 $95,100 $97,900 $100,900 $103,900 $107,000 $110,200 $113,500 $116,900 II.Townhomes - Rental $2,600 $3,900 $4,000 $4,100 $4,200 $4,400 $4,500 $4,600 $4,800 $4,900 III.Total Measure S Revenues $61,400 $96,200 $99,100 $102,000 $105,100 $108,300 $111,500 $114,800 $118,300 $121,800 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 36 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Measure S Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $120,400 $124,000 $127,800 $131,600 $135,500 $139,600 $143,800 $148,100 $152,600 $157,100 $5,100 $5,200 $5,400 $5,500 $5,700 $5,900 $6,000 $6,200 $6,400 $6,600 $125,500 $129,200 $133,200 $137,100 $141,200 $145,500 $149,800 $154,300 $159,000 $163,700 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 37 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 111,970 (1)54,313 (2)166,283 129,893 Solana Winchester Hills 675 0 675 675 Amount Per City Resident or New Residents/ FY 2021 Service Resident Resident Operating Budget (4)Population Equivalent Equivalents I.Franchise Fees $3,229,600 P $28.84 675 II.Business Licenses $265,700 RE $2.05 675 III.Fines and Forfeitures $724,600 RE $5.58 675 IV.Vehicle License Fees $67,600 P $0.60 675 V.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $2,215,900 P $19.79 675 VI.Miscellaneous Revenue $249,100 RE $1.92 675 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) (3)KMA assumption. Assumes that approximately three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4)Based on 3-year historical average (FY 2018 - FY 2020 Actual Revenue received). TABLE B-14 U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002- 2018). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 38 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Population FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Total Residential Population 444 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 II.Total Resident Equivalents 444 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$28.84 P $13,194 $20,359 $20,664 $20,974 $21,289 $21,608 $21,932 $22,261 $22,595 $22,934 Business Licenses $2.05 RE $954 $1,487 $1,524 $1,562 $1,601 $1,641 $1,682 $1,724 $1,767 $1,812 Fines and Forfeitures $5.58 RE $2,602 $4,055 $4,156 $4,260 $4,367 $4,476 $4,588 $4,703 $4,820 $4,941 Vehicle License Fees $0.60 P $282 $439 $450 $461 $473 $484 $497 $509 $522 $535 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $19.79 P $9,232 $14,385 $14,745 $15,114 $15,492 $15,879 $16,276 $16,683 $17,100 $17,527 Miscellaneous Revenue $1.92 RE $895 $1,394 $1,429 $1,465 $1,501 $1,539 $1,577 $1,617 $1,657 $1,698 IV.Total Other Revenues $27,200 $42,100 $43,000 $43,800 $44,700 $45,600 $46,600 $47,500 $48,500 $49,400 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 39 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$28.84 P Business Licenses $2.05 RE Fines and Forfeitures $5.58 RE Vehicle License Fees $0.60 P Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $19.79 P Miscellaneous Revenue $1.92 RE IV.Total Other Revenues (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 $23,278 $23,627 $23,981 $24,341 $24,706 $25,077 $25,453 $25,835 $26,222 $26,616 $1,857 $1,903 $1,951 $2,000 $2,050 $2,101 $2,153 $2,207 $2,262 $2,319 $5,064 $5,191 $5,320 $5,453 $5,590 $5,730 $5,873 $6,020 $6,170 $6,324 $548 $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $17,965 $18,415 $18,875 $19,347 $19,831 $20,326 $20,834 $21,355 $21,889 $22,436 $1,741 $1,784 $1,829 $1,875 $1,922 $1,970 $2,019 $2,069 $2,121 $2,174 $50,500 $51,500 $52,500 $53,600 $54,700 $55,800 $57,000 $58,100 $59,300 $60,600 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 40 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Multi-Family EDU Factor 0.75 Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Apartments - Rental $12,450 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 II.Townhomes - Rental $521 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 III.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $13,000 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 41 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Multi-Family EDU Factor 0.75 Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel I.Apartments - Rental II.Townhomes - Rental III.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 E C) REVENUE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $18,982 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $744 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 42 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population /Jobs City of Temecula 111,970 (1)54,313 (2)166,283 129,893 Solana Winchester Hills 675 0 675 675 Amount Per Net New City Resident or New Residents/"Marginal Cost"Residents/ FY 2021 Escalation Service Population Resident Resident Impact Resident Operating Budget (4)Factor (5)Population Type Equivalent Equivalent Adjustment Equivalent I.Police ---5.00%------$352.36 (6)675 5%641 II.City Council $592,662 2.75%RE 129,893 $4.56 675 40%405 III.Community Support $125,000 2.00%RE 129,893 $0.96 675 80%135 IV.General Government $4,886,310 2.50%RE 129,893 $37.62 675 40%405 V.City Clerk $1,311,452 3.00%RE 129,893 $10.10 675 30%473 VI.City Attorney $961,146 2.00%RE 129,893 $7.40 675 40%405 VII.Finance $3,051,141 2.75%RE 129,893 $23.49 675 30%473 VIII.Community Development $3,953,497 2.75%RE 129,893 $30.44 675 20%540 IX.Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$7,063,704 2.50%RE 129,893 $54.38 675 10%608 X.Public Works - Parks Maintenance $4,007,007 2.50%P 111,970 $35.79 675 10%608 XI.Fire $9,619,533 5.00%RE 129,893 $74.06 675 5%641 XII.Property Tax Administration $94,195 2.00%RE 129,893 $0.73 675 30%473 XIII.Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 3.00%RE 129,893 $7.70 675 90%68 XIV.PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 3.00%RE 129,893 $0.77 675 100%0 XV.Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 2.50%RE 129,893 $23.10 675 0%675 XVI.Total Annual Expenditures $39,765,081 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-4. (5) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (6) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population per the FY 2021 Mid-Year Budget. TABLE B-17 Total Resident Equivalents (3) Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 43 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Pop.FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Total Residential Population 444 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 II.Total Resident Equivalents 444 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%---$163,861 $261,569 $274,647 $288,379 $302,798 $317,938 $333,835 $350,527 $368,053 $386,456 City Council $4.56 2.75%40%RE $1,283 $2,005 $2,060 $2,116 $2,175 $2,234 $2,296 $2,359 $2,424 $2,490 Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE $89 $138 $141 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $162 General Government $37.62 2.50%40%RE $10,529 $16,407 $16,817 $17,237 $17,668 $18,110 $18,563 $19,027 $19,502 $19,990 City Clerk $10.10 3.00%30%RE $3,329 $5,213 $5,369 $5,530 $5,696 $5,867 $6,043 $6,224 $6,411 $6,604 City Attorney $7.40 2.00%40%RE $2,051 $3,180 $3,244 $3,309 $3,375 $3,442 $3,511 $3,581 $3,653 $3,726 Finance $23.49 2.75%30%RE $7,708 $12,040 $12,371 $12,711 $13,061 $13,420 $13,789 $14,168 $14,558 $14,958 Community Development $30.44 2.75%20%RE $11,414 $17,829 $18,320 $18,823 $19,341 $19,873 $20,419 $20,981 $21,558 $22,151 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$54.38 2.50%10%RE $22,831 $35,577 $36,466 $37,378 $38,312 $39,270 $40,252 $41,258 $42,289 $43,347 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50%10%P $15,024 $23,412 $23,997 $24,597 $25,212 $25,842 $26,488 $27,151 $27,829 $28,525 Fire $74.06 5.00%5%RE $34,439 $54,975 $57,723 $60,610 $63,640 $66,822 $70,163 $73,671 $77,355 $81,223 Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00%30%RE $234 $364 $371 $378 $386 $394 $401 $409 $418 $426 Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00%90%RE $363 $568 $585 $602 $620 $639 $658 $678 $698 $719 PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00%100%RE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50%0%RE $10,774 $16,788 $17,208 $17,638 $18,079 $18,531 $18,995 $19,469 $19,956 $20,455 IV.Total Annual Expenditures $283,929 $450,065 $469,319 $489,451 $510,509 $532,531 $555,565 $579,658 $604,862 $631,232 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 44 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Pop. I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%--- City Council $4.56 2.75%40%RE Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE General Government $37.62 2.50%40%RE City Clerk $10.10 3.00%30%RE City Attorney $7.40 2.00%40%RE Finance $23.49 2.75%30%RE Community Development $30.44 2.75%20%RE Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$54.38 2.50%10%RE Public Works - Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50%10%P Fire $74.06 5.00%5%RE Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00%30%RE Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00%90%RE PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00%100%RE Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50%0%RE IV.Total Annual Expenditures (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 675 $405,779 $426,068 $447,371 $469,740 $493,227 $517,888 $543,782 $570,971 $599,520 $629,496 $2,559 $2,629 $2,702 $2,776 $2,852 $2,931 $3,011 $3,094 $3,179 $3,267 $165 $168 $171 $175 $178 $182 $186 $189 $193 $197 $20,490 $21,002 $21,527 $22,065 $22,617 $23,182 $23,762 $24,356 $24,965 $25,589 $6,802 $7,006 $7,216 $7,432 $7,655 $7,885 $8,122 $8,365 $8,616 $8,875 $3,801 $3,877 $3,954 $4,033 $4,114 $4,196 $4,280 $4,366 $4,453 $4,542 $15,369 $15,792 $16,226 $16,673 $17,131 $17,602 $18,086 $18,584 $19,095 $19,620 $22,760 $23,386 $24,029 $24,690 $25,369 $26,066 $26,783 $27,520 $28,276 $29,054 $44,430 $45,541 $46,679 $47,846 $49,043 $50,269 $51,525 $52,814 $54,134 $55,487 $29,238 $29,969 $30,718 $31,486 $32,274 $33,080 $33,907 $34,755 $35,624 $36,515 $85,284 $89,548 $94,025 $98,727 $103,663 $108,846 $114,288 $120,003 $126,003 $132,303 $435 $443 $452 $461 $470 $480 $489 $499 $509 $519 $741 $763 $786 $810 $834 $859 $885 $911 $939 $967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,966 $21,491 $22,028 $22,579 $23,143 $23,722 $24,315 $24,923 $25,546 $26,184 $658,819 $687,683 $717,884 $749,493 $782,570 $817,188 $853,421 $891,350 $931,052 $972,615 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 45 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2023 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax $41,665 $65,318 $66,623 $67,956 $69,315 $70,701 $72,115 $73,558 $75,029 $76,529 Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $47,251 $74,074 $75,556 $77,066 $78,608 $80,180 $81,784 $83,420 $85,088 $86,789 Property Transfer Tax $46,109 $7,228 $7,373 $7,520 $7,671 $7,824 $7,980 $8,140 $8,303 $8,469 Sales Tax - Resident Spending $68,200 $106,900 $110,000 $113,400 $116,800 $120,300 $123,900 $127,700 $131,400 $135,400 Measure S $61,400 $96,200 $99,100 $102,000 $105,100 $108,300 $111,500 $114,800 $118,300 $121,800 Measure C $13,000 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 Franchise Fees $13,194 $20,359 $20,664 $20,974 $21,289 $21,608 $21,932 $22,261 $22,595 $22,934 Business Licenses $954 $1,487 $1,524 $1,562 $1,601 $1,641 $1,682 $1,724 $1,767 $1,812 Fines and Forfeitures $2,602 $4,055 $4,156 $4,260 $4,367 $4,476 $4,588 $4,703 $4,820 $4,941 Vehicle License Fees $282 $439 $450 $461 $473 $484 $497 $509 $522 $535 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $9,232 $14,385 $14,745 $15,114 $15,492 $15,879 $16,276 $16,683 $17,100 $17,527 Miscellaneous Revenue $895 $1,394 $1,429 $1,465 $1,501 $1,539 $1,577 $1,617 $1,657 $1,698 Total Revenues $304,784 $411,539 $421,320 $431,478 $441,917 $452,632 $463,531 $474,815 $486,281 $498,134 II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $163,861 $261,569 $274,647 $288,379 $302,798 $317,938 $333,835 $350,527 $368,053 $386,456 City Council $1,283 $2,005 $2,060 $2,116 $2,175 $2,234 $2,296 $2,359 $2,424 $2,490 Community Support $89 $138 $141 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $162 General Government $10,529 $16,407 $16,817 $17,237 $17,668 $18,110 $18,563 $19,027 $19,502 $19,990 City Clerk $3,329 $5,213 $5,369 $5,530 $5,696 $5,867 $6,043 $6,224 $6,411 $6,604 City Attorney $2,051 $3,180 $3,244 $3,309 $3,375 $3,442 $3,511 $3,581 $3,653 $3,726 Finance $7,708 $12,040 $12,371 $12,711 $13,061 $13,420 $13,789 $14,168 $14,558 $14,958 Community Development $11,414 $17,829 $18,320 $18,823 $19,341 $19,873 $20,419 $20,981 $21,558 $22,151 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$22,831 $35,577 $36,466 $37,378 $38,312 $39,270 $40,252 $41,258 $42,289 $43,347 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $15,024 $23,412 $23,997 $24,597 $25,212 $25,842 $26,488 $27,151 $27,829 $28,525 Fire $34,439 $54,975 $57,723 $60,610 $63,640 $66,822 $70,163 $73,671 $77,355 $81,223 Property Tax Administration $234 $364 $371 $378 $386 $394 $401 $409 $418 $426 Retiree Medical Contribution $363 $568 $585 $602 $620 $639 $658 $678 $698 $719 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $10,774 $16,788 $17,208 $17,638 $18,079 $18,531 $18,995 $19,469 $19,956 $20,455 Total Expenditures $283,929 $450,065 $469,319 $489,451 $510,509 $532,531 $555,565 $579,658 $604,862 $631,232 III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit)$20,855 ($38,526)($47,999)($57,973)($68,592)($79,899)($92,034)($104,843)($118,581)($133,098) Per Unit Per Year $60 ($110)($137)($166)($196)($228)($263)($300)($339)($380) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 1.07 0.91 0.90 0.88 0.87 0.85 0.83 0.82 0.80 0.79 TABLE B-19 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 46 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT SOLANA WINCHESTER HILLS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. Public Works - Parks Maintenance Fire Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year Revenues to Expenditure Ratio TABLE B-19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2033 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 $78,059 $79,620 $81,214 $82,838 $84,494 $86,184 $87,908 $89,666 $91,459 $93,288 $88,524 $90,296 $92,102 $93,943 $95,822 $97,739 $99,694 $101,687 $103,722 $105,795 $8,638 $8,811 $8,988 $9,167 $9,351 $9,537 $9,728 $9,923 $10,121 $10,324 $139,400 $143,600 $148,000 $152,300 $156,900 $161,600 $166,500 $171,500 $176,600 $181,900 $125,500 $129,200 $133,200 $137,100 $141,200 $145,500 $149,800 $154,300 $159,000 $163,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $19,700 $23,278 $23,627 $23,981 $24,341 $24,706 $25,077 $25,453 $25,835 $26,222 $26,616 $1,857 $1,903 $1,951 $2,000 $2,050 $2,101 $2,153 $2,207 $2,262 $2,319 $5,064 $5,191 $5,320 $5,453 $5,590 $5,730 $5,873 $6,020 $6,170 $6,324 $548 $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $17,965 $18,415 $18,875 $19,347 $19,831 $20,326 $20,834 $21,355 $21,889 $22,436 $1,741 $1,784 $1,829 $1,875 $1,922 $1,970 $2,019 $2,069 $2,121 $2,174 $510,274 $522,709 $535,736 $548,654 $562,171 $576,084 $590,298 $604,913 $619,934 $635,260 $405,779 $426,068 $447,371 $469,740 $493,227 $517,888 $543,782 $570,971 $599,520 $629,496 $2,559 $2,629 $2,702 $2,776 $2,852 $2,931 $3,011 $3,094 $3,179 $3,267 $165 $168 $171 $175 $178 $182 $186 $189 $193 $197 $20,490 $21,002 $21,527 $22,065 $22,617 $23,182 $23,762 $24,356 $24,965 $25,589 $6,802 $7,006 $7,216 $7,432 $7,655 $7,885 $8,122 $8,365 $8,616 $8,875 $3,801 $3,877 $3,954 $4,033 $4,114 $4,196 $4,280 $4,366 $4,453 $4,542 $15,369 $15,792 $16,226 $16,673 $17,131 $17,602 $18,086 $18,584 $19,095 $19,620 $22,760 $23,386 $24,029 $24,690 $25,369 $26,066 $26,783 $27,520 $28,276 $29,054 $44,430 $45,541 $46,679 $47,846 $49,043 $50,269 $51,525 $52,814 $54,134 $55,487 $29,238 $29,969 $30,718 $31,486 $32,274 $33,080 $33,907 $34,755 $35,624 $36,515 $85,284 $89,548 $94,025 $98,727 $103,663 $108,846 $114,288 $120,003 $126,003 $132,303 $435 $443 $452 $461 $470 $480 $489 $499 $509 $519 $741 $763 $786 $810 $834 $859 $885 $911 $939 $967 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,966 $21,491 $22,028 $22,579 $23,143 $23,722 $24,315 $24,923 $25,546 $26,184 $658,819 $687,683 $717,884 $749,493 $782,570 $817,188 $853,421 $891,350 $931,052 $972,615 ($148,545)($164,974)($182,148)($200,839)($220,399)($241,104)($263,123)($286,437)($311,118)($337,355) ($424)($471)($520)($574)($630)($689)($752)($818)($889)($964) 0.77 0.76 0.75 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68 0.67 0.65 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Solana Winchester Hills FIA_v2;9/20/2021;mdt Page 47 Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA June 2, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for application No. PA20-1371, a Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street, approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road. Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a receipt in the amount of $50.00 County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting to the email listed below. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at email: scott.cooper@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Attachments: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment – Filing Fee Receipt VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com [ City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2019070974 Project Title: Solana Winchester (PA20-1371) Project Location: Terminus of Date Sttreet, approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road (APNs: 916-400-042, 916-400-042) Project Description: Development Plan for a 349-unit apartment community Lead Agency: City of Temecula, County of Riverside Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above-described project on June 1, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That the project is consistent with the SEIR and is a project under a Specific Plan that was analyzed by the SEIR and no further environmental review is required under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15162. 3. Additional mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project, but the project will be required to adhere to the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project, but the project will have to comply with the Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program that was adopted with the SEIR. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project, but was adopted for the SEIR. 6. Findings were not made for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, but were made in connection with the SEIR. This is to certify that the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) that was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 for the Harveston Specific Plan, together with comments and responses is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME CERTIFICATE OF FEE EXEMPTION De Minimus Impact Finding Project Proponent: ReyLenn Properties Project Title: Solana Winchester (PA20-1371) Location: Terminus of Date St. approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Rd. (APNs: 916-400-042, 916-400-042) Project Description: Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community Findings of Exemption (attach as necessary): 1. The Project consists of a Development Plan for a 349-unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres 2. On August 14, 2001, the City Council certified the Program Environmental Impact Report for the Harveston Specific Plan (SCH #99041033). Amendment No. 1 to the Harveston Specific Plan (SP 13) was approved on August 26, 2003 by the adoption of Resolution No. 03-110. A Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was prepared and certified on December 1, 2020 in connection with the second amendment to the Harveston Specific Plan that allowed for the creation of the residential overlay zone. The proposed project has been determined to be consistent with the previously adopted Harveston SEIR. Staff has determined that the project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 as the proposed residential development is in conformity with the Harveston Specific Plan, as amended. Staff has reviewed the SEIR and has determined that the proposed project does not require the preparation of a subsequent Environmental Impact Report as none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines (14 Cal. Code Regs. 15162) exist. Specifically, there are no substantial changes proposed by the proposed project that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the proposed project are undertaken that will require major revisions of the previous SEIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and there is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous SEIR was adopted, showing that: (a) the proposed project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the SEIR; (b) there are significant effects previously examined that will be substantially more severe than shown in the SEIR; (c) there are mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the proposed project, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the City declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The application for a development plan for a 349 unit apartment community is consistent with the project that was analyzed by the SEIR. The proposed project is required to meet all requirements and mitigation contained in SEIR. Certification: I hereby certify that the public agency has made the above finding and that the project will not individually or cumulatively have an adverse effect on wildlife resources, as defined in Section 711.2 of the Fish and Game Code. Luke Watson Date Deputy City Manager Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA20-1371 APPLICANT: ReyLenn Properties PROPOSAL: Development Plan for a 349 unit apartment community built on 15.1 acres located at the terminus of Date Street, approximately 900 feet south of Ynez Road (APNs: 916- 400-042, 916-400-042) ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project does not require further environmental review pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182 (Projects Pursuant to a Specific Plan) and Section 15162 (Subsequent EIRs and Negative Declarations) as none of the conditions requiring further environmental review under the aforementioned Sections exist. The Planning Commission will be asked to consider adopting a Notice of Determination for the proposed project. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: June 1, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.