Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout07202022 PC AgendaIn compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35 .102.35.104 ADA Title II]. AGENDA TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JULY 20, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Commissioner Bob Hagel ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio, Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Commission request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Commission on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read . Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1.Minutes Approve the Action Minutes of June 15, 2022Recommendation: Page 1 Planning Commission Agenda July 20, 2022 Action MinutesAttachments: BUSINESS Members of the public may address the Commission on Business items that appear on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca .gov. Speaker cards for in-person comments will be called in the order received by the Commission Secretary and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 2.Long Range Project No. LR22-0738, General Plan Consistency Review for an Amendment to the Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program, Mark Collins Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) TO ADD ONE PROJECT TO THE CIP AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-0738) Recommendation: Agenda Report Planning Commission Resolution CIP Budget Amendment Sheet Attachments: PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the Commission before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of the project(s) at the time of the hearing. If you challenge any of the project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the Commission Secretary at, or prior to, the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the Commission Secretary or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to PlanningCommission@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. Any person dissatisfied with a decision of the Commission may file an appeal of the Commission's decision . Said appeal must be filed within 15 calendar days after service of written notice of the decision. The appeal must be filed on the appropriate Community Development Department form and be accompanied Page 2 Planning Commission Agenda July 20, 2022 by the appropriate filing fee. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No . 2021-54. 3.Planning Application Number PA21-0987, a Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road, Eric Jones Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0987, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 6,240 SQUARE FOOT EXPRESS CARWASH LOCATED AT 26478 YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 910-320-048) Recommendation: Agenda Report Vicinity Map Plan Reductions PC Resolution Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval Notice of Public Hearing Notice of Exemption Attachments: 4.Planning Application No. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; PA20-1325, a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive, Scott Cooper Adopt resolutions entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)” Recommendation: Page 3 Planning Commission Agenda July 20, 2022 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)” PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)” PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)” PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326)” Page 4 Planning Commission Agenda July 20, 2022 Agenda Report Aerial Map Plan Reductions (Development Plan) Plan Reductions (Tentative Tract Map) PC Resolution – Negative Declaration Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution PC Resolution – General Plan Amendment Exhibit A - Draft City Council Resolution Exhibit A - Amended General Plan Land Use Map PC Resolution – Planned Development Overlay Amendment Exhibit A – Draft City Council Ordinance Exhibit A – Planned Development Overlay Amendment PC Resolution – Development Plan Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution Exhibit B – Draft Conditions of Approval PC Resolution – Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution Exhibit B – Draft Conditions of Approval Final Negative Declaration Fiscal Impact Analysis Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing Attachments: COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on Wednesday, August 3, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 5 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA JUNE 15, 2022 - 6:00 PM CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Chairman Gary Watts FLAG SALUTE: Vice Chair Lanae Turley-Trejo ROLL CALL: Hagel, Ruiz, Telesio (absent), Turley-Trejo, Watts PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Ruiz, Second by Turley-Trejo. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 1. Minutes Recommendation: Approve the Action Minutes of June 1, 2022 PUBLIC HEARING 2. Long Range Planning Project Numbers LR21-0909, an amendment to Title 9 of the Temecula Municipal Code, adding Chapter 9.80 Shopping Carts, Mark Collins Recommendation: Adopt a resolution entitled: PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022-16 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE, ADDING CHAPTER 9.80 SHOPPING CARTS AND FINDING THIS ORDINANCE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) PURSUANT TO CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15061 (B)(3) (LONG RANGE PROJECT NO. LR21-0909)" Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-0, Telesio absent): Motion by Turley-Trejo, Second by Ruiz. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Telesio absent. 2 COMMISSIONER REPORTS COMMISSION SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR REPORT PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR REPORT ADJOURNMENT At 6:47 PM, the Planning Commission meeting was formally adjourned to Wednesday, July 20, 2022, at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Gary Watts, Chairperson Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and Members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2022 PREPARED BY: Mark Collins, Assistant Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: General Plan Consistency Review for an Amendment to the Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (LR22-0738) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed Amendment to the current Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program and make a determination that the proposed Amendment is in conformance with the adopted City of Temecula General Plan. CEQA: Exempt: Not a “Project” as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15061(b)(3) and 15378(b)(4) BACKGROUND SUMMARY: Government Code Section 65103 of State Planning and Zoning Law requires that the Planning Commission review and provide comments to the City Council regarding the conformity of the proposed amendment to the current Fiscal Year 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) with the adopted General Plan. On June 14, 2022, the City Council approved the CIP Budget for FY 2023-2027. The CIP included a number of projects to be completed during the five-year Capital Improvement Program. In addition to the approved CIP, staff is recommending the addition of one (1) project. This project consists of one (1) new Capital Improvement Project under Infrastructure Project – Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area. Prior to Council appropriating funding to the project, the Planning Commission must first make findings that the project is consistent with the General Plan. ANALYSIS Infrastructure Projects The Fiscal Years 2023-27 CIP Amendment contains one (1) project in this category. 2 1. The Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreation Area Project includes the design and construction of a multi-use outdoor recreational area adjacent to the Mary Phillips Senior Center. In addition, the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units will be replaced. The multi-use outdoor recreation area could include a shuffleboard court and other court-based activities. Staff has reviewed the General Plan and has determined that this project is consistent with the goals and policies of the Open Space/Conservation Element and the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element. Open Space/Conservation Element: Goal 1 A high quality parks and recreation system that meets the diverse recreation needs of residents. Policy 1.1 Ensure sufficient parkland and recreational facilities. Policy 1.4 Encourage public safety and compatibility with adjacent land uses in park design and development, including location of buildings, activity areas, lighting, and parking. Policy 1.7 Consider the establishment of special use parks for seniors, pets, etc. Growth Management/Public Facilities Element: Goal 2 Orderly and efficient patterns of growth that enhance quality of life for Temecula residents. Policy 2.2 Ensure that phasing of public facilities and services occurs in such a way that new development is adequately supported as it develops. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS No public hearing notice is required for the Planning Commission’s review and conformity finding of the proposed Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with Title 14 California Code of Regulations. The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Furthermore, the Amendment for FY 2023-27 CIP project is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the commonsense exemption, which provides that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for 3 causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in questions may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Planning Commission’s review and determination that the Amendment to the FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. CIP Budget Amendment Sheet PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA MAKING A FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH THE GENERAL PLAN FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE FISCAL YEARS 2023-2027 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) TO ADD ONE PROJECT TO THE CIP AND MAKE A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER SECTIONS 15378(B)(4) AND 15061(B)(3) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (“CEQA”) (LONG RANGE PLANNING PROJECT NO. LR22-0738) THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The City of Temecula originally adopted a comprehensive General Plan in 2005, which has been amended to include specific policies and objectives for infrastructure, construction and maintenance of public facilities; and B. Pursuant to California Government Code Sections 65402 and 65403, the Planning Commission is required to review the Capital Improvement Program to determine that it is consistent with the City’s adopted General Plan; and C. Staff is proposing to add the following project to the Capital Improvement Program: (1) Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area (collectively “Project”); and D. Staff has reviewed the General Plan’s Land Use, Open Space/Conservation, Growth Management/Public Facilities, Public Safety, Economic Development, and Housing Elements, and has determined that the Project is consistent with the General Plan, and further the goals and policies of the Open Space/Conservation Element and the Growth Management/Public Facilities Element of the adopted General Plan; and E. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a public meeting to consider the proposed Project for Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and F. The Project within the CIP amendment is categorized as Infrastructure; and G. The category listed in the attached Fiscal Years 2023-2027 Capital Improvement Program Amendment and the staff report analysis consistency hereto demonstrates that this capital project is consistent with goals, policies, and program of the Temecula General Plan. The findings of consistency set forth in the staff report are incorporated herein by this reference. Section 2. Consistency Finding. The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Projects are consistent with the General Plan. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the adoption of this resolution: A. The Amendment to FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is exempt from California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review, in accordance with Title 14 California Code of Regulations. The Amendment to FY 2021-25 Capital Improvement Program is not a “project” within the meaning of Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore exempt from the requirements of CEQA. Section 15378(b)(4) of the CEQA Guidelines states that a project does not include the creation of government funding mechanisms or other government fiscal activities which do not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. Furthermore, the Amendment for FY 2023-27 CIP project is exempt under Section 15061(b)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines, the commonsense exemption, which provides that CEQA applies only to projects which have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in questions may have a significant effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA. The Planning Commission’s review and determination that the Amendment to the FY 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program is consistent with the City of Temecula’s General Plan, does not result in the construction nor cause the construction of any specific CIP project, and will have no effect on the environment, and therefore, no environmental impact assessment is necessary. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-XX was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary Construction Engineering 25,000 25,000 Total Operating Costs Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 650,000Total Funding -650,000 - CDBG - CV 650,000 650,000 Source of Funds: Total Expenditures -650,000 -650,000 Design & Environmental 75,000 75,000 50,000 Construction 500,000 500,000 City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA Infrastructure Project Project Description: The project include the design and construction of a multi-use outdoor recreational area adjacent to Mary Phillips Senior Center. In addition, the Heating, Ventilation, and Air Conditioning (HVAC) units will be replaced. The multi- use outdoor recreational area could include a shuffleboard court and other court- based activities. Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs and facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City. Project Status: This is a new project. Department: Public Works. Level: II Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2021-22 Adjusted 2022-23 Baseline Budget 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 Projected 2025-26 Projected 2026-27 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 50,000 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE OF MEETING: July, 20, 2022 PREPARED BY: Eric Jones, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application Number PA21-0987, a Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a Resolution approving the project subject to Conditions of Approval CEQA: Categorically Exempt Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Hannibal Petrossi General Plan Designation: Community Commercial (CC) Zoning Designation: Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan (SP-7) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Existing Vacant Restaurant / Community Commercial (CC) North: Existing Parking Lot, Existing Commercial Structures / Community Commercial (CC) South: Existing Commercial / Community Commercial (CC) East: Ring Road, Existing Commercial / Community Commercial (CC) West: Existing Parking Lot, Existing Commercial / Community Commercial (CC) 2 Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area: 1.22 Acres N/A No Minimum Lot Area Per the Specific Plan Total Floor Area/Ratio: 0.12 N/A No Minimum Lot Area Per the Specific Plan Landscape Area/Coverage: 0.15 0.15 Minimum Parking Provided/Required: 30 Spaces Proposed 15 Spaces Required AFFORDABLE/WORKFORCE HOUSING Located in Housing Element Vacant Sites Inventory? Yes No Located in Affordable Housing Overlay Zone (AHOZ)? Yes No BACKGROUND SUMMARY On July 26, 2021, Hannibal Petrossi submitted Planning Application PA21-0987, a Development Plan for an express self-service carwash located within the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The project will be located on the same site as a currently vacant restaurant structure. This structure will be demolished to allow for construction of the carwash. The existing site will also be modified to allow for the necessary queuing lanes and vacuum parking stalls. The Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan is divided into two Planning Areas. The project site for the carwash is located in Planning Area 2. The Schedule of Permitted Uses (Table IIA) of the Specific Plan states that car washes are a permitted use in Planning Areas 1 and 2 and therefore do not require a Conditional Use Permit. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS Site Plan The project site is surrounded by existing commercial uses. Queuing lanes for the carwash will be located adjacent to the ring road and access to these lanes will be taken from the north side of the project site. The queuing lanes will accommodate up to 21 vehicles. Customers will utilize kiosks at the end of the queuing lanes to select and pay for their wash. A drive aisle will lead customers to the west side of the lot to the carwash tunnel. An exit point is located along this drive aisle before reaching the tunnel. Vehicles can either exit the site or enter the vacuum area after completing their wash. 3 The car wash is based on a self-service model with no individual wash bays. Staff calculated parking requirements based on the 2.5 spaces per wash bay requirement in the Development Code and applied it to the number of cars that can be washed in the tunnel at any one time. The car wash can accept up to six cars at once. Therefore, the number of required parking spaces is fifteen. The applicant has provided thirty spaces. Twenty-eight of these parking spaces will be covered vacuum stations featuring solar arrays. Architecture The project will feature architecture in the Spanish Colonial Revival style. Elements indicative of this style include, but are not limited to: • Arched design elements with trim • Tile roofing • Wall sconces • Smooth wall finish • Wrought iron Each of these elements can be found on the proposed structure. A tower element will also be incorporated on the structure as well as varying roof lines. These features will provide visual interest to the structure. Landscaping The project will feature a variety of plant materials to soften the visual impacts of the structure and covered parking stalls. A variety of shrubs and trees will be incorporated into the project. Plants for the project include, but are not limited to: • Trees: o Holly Oak o Western Redbud o Chinese Pistache • Shrubs o California Coffeeberry o Solar Flare Yellow Bells o Sunset Rockrose • Ground Covers o Silver Carpet Dymondia o Trailing Myoporum o Blue Chalksticks LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS Notice of the public hearing was published in The Press-Enterprise on July 7, 2022, and mailed to the property owners within the required 600-foot radius. 4 ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects) The project is within City limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable zoning regulations Including the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Carwashes are a permitted use within the entire Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan area therefore impacts related to air quality have been addressed in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan EIR (SCN: 89020013). The project site has accommodated various commercial restaurants and is surrounded by active commercial development. All utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Noise impacts will be mitigated by utilizing blower mufflers. With regard to water quality, the project has completed the Water Quality Management Plan process with the City’s Public Works department to ensure all current standards are met. Negative effects related to traffic are also not anticipated since the project provides queuing for up to 21 cars. FINDINGS Development Plan (Section 17.05.010.E) 1. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The use is permitted in the Temecula Reginal Center Specific Plan. The use has also been evaluated to ensure compliance with other requirements of the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The use was found to be in compliance with all of these laws and requirements. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to maintain compliance with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes. These codes contain provisions that are designed to ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. Adverse impacts are not anticipated. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Plan Reductions 3. PC Resolution 4. Exhibit A – Draft Conditions of Approval 5. Notice of Public Hearing 6. Draft Notice of Exemption or Notice of Determination for County Clerk WINCHESTER RDYN EZ R D PROMENADE MALL SOUTHPR O M E N A D E M ALL W EST RING RDPROMENADEMALLNO R T H Project Site CITY O F TEMEC ULA PA21-0987 \Date Created: 7/29/2021 1:2,4001 inch = 200 feet 910-320 -048 The map PA21-0987.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to updateand modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on thismap. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING PLANNING APPLICATION NO. PA21-0987, A DEVELOPMENT PLAN TO CONSTRUCT AN APPROXIMATELY 6,240 SQUARE FOOT EXPRESS CARWASH LOCATED AT 26478 YNEZ ROAD, AND MAKING A FINDING OF EXEMPTION UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (CEQA) (APN 910-320-048) Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On July 26, 2022, Hannibal Petrossi filed Planning Application No. PA21-0987, a Development Plan Application in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Application was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. The Planning Commission, at a regular meeting, considered the Application and environmental review on July 20, 2022, at a duly noticed public hearing as prescribed by law, at which time the City staff and interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. D. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the testimony, the Planning Commission approved Planning Application No. PA21-0987 subject to and based upon the findings set forth hereunder. E. All legal preconditions to the adoption of the Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in approving the Application hereby finds, determines and declares that: Development Plan, Development Code Section 17.05.010.E A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The use is permitted in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. The use has also been evaluated to ensure compliance with other requirements of the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The use was found to be in compliance with all of these laws and requirements. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The project has been reviewed and conditioned to maintain compliance with the Development, Fire, and Building Codes. These codes contain provisions that are designed to ensure for the public health, safety, and general welfare. Adverse impacts are not anticipated. Section 3. Environmental Findings. The Planning Commission hereby makes the following environmental findings and determinations in connection with the approval of the Development Plan Application: A. In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the proposed project has been deemed to be categorically exempt from further environmental review (15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects); The project is within City limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable zoning regulations Including the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Carwashes are a permitted use within the entire Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan area therefore impacts related to air quality have been addressed in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan EIR (SCN: 89020013). The project site has accommodated various commercial restaurants and is surrounded by active commercial development. All utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Noise impacts will be mitigated by utilizing blower mufflers. With regard to water quality, the project has completed the Water Quality Management Plan process with the City’s Public Works department to ensure all current standards are met. Negative effects related to traffic are also not anticipated since the project provides queuing for up to 21 cars. Section 4. Conditions. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA21-0987, a Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary CITY OF TEMECULA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ACCEPTANCE Planning Application Number: PA21-0987 By signing below, I/we have agreed to the following Conditions of Approval, including (but not limited to) any referenced documents, local state, or federal regulations, statement of operations, hours of operation, floor plans, site plans, and Conditions that may require the payment or reimbursement of fees, as described. I/we have read the attached Conditions of Approval and understand them. I/we also understand that violations or non-compliance with these Conditions of Approval, may delay a project, and/or result in the revocation of a permit in accordance with the Temecula Municipal Code. I/we are also responsible for disclosing these Conditions of Approval to any successive owners/operators. I/we agree and commit to the City of Temecula that I/we will implement and abide by the Conditions of Approval, including any indemnification requirements imposed by those conditions. Property Owner Printed Name _________________________ Applicant Printed Name _________________________ Property Owner Signature & Date ___________________________ Applicant Signature & Date ___________________________ Parcel Number(s): 910-320-048 EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA21 -0987 Temecula Express Car Wash Development Plan: A Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road. Assessor's Parcel No.: 910-320-048 Commercial MSHCP Category: Service Commercial DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Per WRCOG Requirements N/A (Non-Residential Project) July 20, 2022 July 20, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Not Located within the Uptown Temecula Specific Plan) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 19 Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination as required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15062 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition. Failure to submit the Notice of Exemption will result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Exemption include the Fifty Dollar County ($50.00) administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements ADA Parking. All ADA parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 3. Page 2 of 19 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 5. Consistency with Specific Plans. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Specific Plan No. 7. (Temecula Reginal Center). 6. Compliance with EIR. The project and all subsequent projects within this site shall comply with all mitigation measures identified within EIR No. 89020013. 7. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Paint Inspection. The applicant shall paint a three-foot-by-three-foot section of the building for Planning Division inspection, prior to commencing painting of the building. 12. Photographic Prints. The applicant shall submit to the Planning Division for permanent filing two 8" X 10" glossy photographic color prints of the approved color and materials board and the colored architectural elevations. All labels on the color and materials board and elevations shall be readable on the photographic prints. 13. Page 3 of 19 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Roof: Clay roof tile: MCA CB364 Vintage Carmel Blend Main Walls Smooth Finish: Dunn Edwards No. DE6113 Alpaca Wool Trim Walls Smooth Finish: Dunn Edwards No. DE6115 Practical Tan Stone: Brookside Coronado Stone Wrought Iron: Black 14. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 15. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. 16. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 17. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 18. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 19. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 20. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 21. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 22. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 23. Page 4 of 19 Archaeological/Cultural Resources Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If at any time during excavation/construction of the site, archaeological/cultural resources, or any artifacts or other objects which reasonably appears to be evidence of cultural or archaeological resource are discovered, the property owner shall immediately advise the City of such and the City shall cause all further excavation or other disturbance of the affected area to immediately cease. The Director of Community Development at his/her sole discretion may require the property owner to deposit a sum of money it deems reasonably necessary to allow the City to consult and/or authorize an independent, fully qualified specialist to inspect the site at no cost to the City, in order to assess the significance of the find. Upon determining that the discovery is not an archaeological/ cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner of such determination and shall authorize the resumption of work. Upon determining that the discovery is an archaeological/cultural resource, the Planning Director shall notify the property owner that no further excavation or development may take place until a mitigation plan or other corrective measures have been approved by the Planning Director.” 24. Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement. The developer is required to enter into a Cultural Resources Treatment Agreement with the Pechanga Tribe. The agreement shall be in place prior to issuance of a grading permit. To accomplish this, the applicant should contact the Pechanga Tribe no less than 30 days and no more than 60 days prior to issuance of a grading permit. This Agreement will address the treatment and disposition of cultural resources, the designation, responsibilities, and participation of professional Pechanga Tribal monitors during grading, excavation and ground disturbing activities; project grading and development scheduling; terms of compensation for the monitors; and treatment and final disposition of any cultural resources, sacred sites, and human remains discovered onsite. The Pechanga monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the project archaeologist in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. 25. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 26. Archaeological Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A qualified archaeological monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any archaeological resources discovered on the property.” 27. Tribal Monitoring Notes. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “A Pechanga Tribal monitor will be present and will have the authority to stop and redirect grading activities, in consultation with the project archaeologist and their designated monitors, to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property." 28. Relinquishment of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “The landowner agrees to relinquish ownership of all cultural resources, including all archaeological artifacts that are found on the project area, to the Pechanga Tribe for proper treatment and disposition.” 29. Page 5 of 19 Preservation of Sacred Sites. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “All sacred sites are to be avoided and preserved.” 30. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 31. Rough Grading Plans. A copy of the Rough Grading Plans shall be submitted and approved by the Planning Division. 32. Cultural Resources Disposition. In the event that Native American cultural resources are discovered during the course of grading (inadvertent discoveries), the following procedures shall be carried out for final disposition of the discoveries: a) One or more of the following treatments, in order of preference, shall be employed with the tribes. Evidence of such shall be provided to the City of Temecula Community Development Department: i. Preservation-In-Place of the cultural resources, if feasible. Preservation in place means avoiding the resources, leaving them in the place where they were found with no development affecting the integrity of the resources. ii. Reburial of the resources on the Project property. The measures for reburial shall include, at least, the following: Measures and provisions to protect the future reburial area from any future impacts in perpetuity. Reburial shall not occur until all legally required cataloging and basic recordation have been completed, with an exception that sacred items, burial goods and Native American human remains are excluded. Any reburial process shall be culturally appropriate. Listing of contents and location of the reburial shall be included in the confidential Phase IV report. The Phase IV Report shall be filed with the City under a confidential cover and not subject to Public Records Request. 33. Page 6 of 19 Inadvertent Archeological Find. If during ground disturbance activities, unique cultural resources are discovered that were not assessed by the archaeological report(s) and/or environmental assessment conducted prior to project approval, the following procedures shall be followed. Unique cultural resources are defined, for this condition only, as being multiple artifacts in close association with each other, but may include fewer artifacts if the area of the find is determined to be of significance due to its sacred or cultural importance as determined in consultation with the Native American Tribe(s). i. All ground disturbance activities within 100 feet of the discovered cultural resources shall be halted until a meeting is convened between the developer, the archaeologist, the tribal representative(s) and the Community Development Director to discuss the significance of the find. ii. At the meeting, the significance of the discoveries shall be discussed and after consultation with the tribal representative(s) and the archaeologist, a decision shall be made, with the concurrence of the Community Development Director, as to the appropriate mitigation (documentation, recovery, avoidance, etc.) for the cultural resources. iii. Grading of further ground disturbance shall not resume within the area of the discovery until an agreement has been reached by all parties as to the appropriate mitigation. Work shall be allowed to continue outside of the buffer area and will be monitored by additional Tribal monitors if needed. iv. Treatment and avoidance of the newly discovered resources shall be consistent with the Cultural Resources Management Plan and Monitoring Agreements entered into with the appropriate tribes. This may include avoidance of the cultural resources through project design, in-place preservation of cultural resources located in native soils and/or re-burial on the Project property so they are not subject to further disturbance in perpetuity as identified in Non-Disclosure of Reburial Condition. v. If the find is determined to be significant and avoidance of the site has not been achieved, a Phase III data recovery plan shall be prepared by the project archeologist, in consultation with the Tribe, and shall be submitted to the City for their review and approval prior to implementation of the said plan. vi. Pursuant to Calif. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.2(b) avoidance is the preferred method of preservation for archaeological resources and cultural resources. If the landowner and the Tribe(s) cannot agree on the significance or the mitigation for the archaeological or cultural resources, these issues will be presented to the City Community Development Director for decision. The City Community Development Director shall make the determination based on the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act with respect to archaeological resources, recommendations of the project archeologist and shall take into account the cultural and religious principles and practices of the Tribe. Notwithstanding any other rights available under the law, the decision of the City Community Development Director shall be appealable to the City Planning Commission and/or City Council.” 34. Page 7 of 19 Archaeologist Retained. Prior to beginning project construction, the Project Applicant shall retain a Riverside County qualified/City of Temecula approved archaeological monitor to monitor all ground-disturbing activities in an effort to identify any unknown archaeological resources. Any newly discovered cultural resource deposits shall be subject to a cultural resources evaluation (See PL-4). The archaeological monitor's authority to stop and redirect grading will be exercised in consultation with the Pechanga Tribe in order to evaluate the significance of any potential resources discovered on the property. Pechanga and archaeological monitors shall be allowed to monitor all grading, excavation and groundbreaking activities, and shall also have the limited authority to stop and redirect grading activities should an inadvertent cultural resource be identified. The archaeologist shall provide a final monitoring report at the end of all earthmoving activities to the City of Temecula, the Pechanga Tribe and the Eastern Information Center at UC, Riverside. 35. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 36. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Parking Area Landscaping. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall provide a minimum five-foot wide planter to be installed at the perimeter of all parking areas. Curbs, walkways, etc. are not to infringe on this area. 37. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 38. Downspouts. All downspouts shall be internalized. 39. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 40. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 41. Page 8 of 19 Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 42. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 43. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 44. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 45. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 46. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 47. Page 9 of 19 Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 48. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for equestrian trails and pedestrian trails within private common areas. 49. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 50. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to decorative furniture, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 51. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 52. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 53. Landscape Pre-construction Meeting. Prior to issuance of any Building Permits, a pre-construction landscape meeting shall be held between the project manager, assigned Planner, and the City’s landscape consultant. 54. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of all residences and public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 55. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 56. Page 10 of 19 Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 57. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 58. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy, or any use allowed by this approval. 59. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated August 19, 2021, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 60. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated February 9, 2022, a copy of which is attached. 61. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated November 10, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 62. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District’s transmittal dated November 10, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 63. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 64. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 65. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 66. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 67. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 68. Page 11 of 19 Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 69. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearances/permits from applicable agencies such as Southern California Edison for the relocation of the existing vault. 70. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 71. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 72. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 73. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 74. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 75. Page 12 of 19 Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 76. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 77. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 78. Ingress/Egress Easement. The developer shall obtain an easement for ingress and egress over adjacent properties. The easement information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 79. Sight Distance. The developer shall limit landscaping in the corner cut-off area of all street intersections and adjacent to driveways to provide for minimum sight distance and visibility. 80. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 81. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 82. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 83. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 84. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 85. Page 13 of 19 Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 86. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 87. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 88. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 89. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 90. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 91. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 92. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 93. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 94. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 95. Demolition. Demolition permits require separate approvals and permits. 96. Page 14 of 19 Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 97. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 98. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 99. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all Commercial and multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant for all and for single family dwellings and tract homes hydrants shall be 500 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 250 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 100. Fire Hydrant Clearance. As required by the California Fire Code, when any portion of the facility or building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction is more than 400 feet from a hydrant on a fire apparatus road, as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the facility or building, on-site fire hydrants and mains shall be provided where required by the fire code official. (CFC Chapter 5). 101. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 102. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 2-hour duration for single family dwellings and 4,000 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi-family and commercial projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 103. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 104. Page 15 of 19 Two Point Access. This development shall maintain two points of access, via all-weather surface roads, as approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 5). 105. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 106. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code 15.16.020). 107. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 108. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish an electronic set of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 109. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Sprinkler plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Paper plans are no longer accepted. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. The fire sprinkler riser will be located in the dedicated fire sprinkler riser room with direct exterior access. 110. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Fire alarm plans must be submitted electronically by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. Paper plans are no longer accepted. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. The FACP will be located in the fire sprinkler riser room. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 111. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 112. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 113. Page 16 of 19 Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Commercial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. All suites shall have a minimum of 6-inch high letters and/or numbers on both the front and rear doors. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 114. Knox Box. A “Knox -Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 115. Additional Submittals (Hazardous Materials). The applicant shall submit for review and approval by the City Fire Department a Hazardous Material Inventory Statement and Fire Department Technical Report. A full hazardous materials inventory report and color coded floor plan is required for any building storing or using hazardous materials (CFC Chapters 1 and 50 through 67 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 116. Additional Submittals (Fire Above/Below Ground Tanks). The developer/applicant shall be responsible for obtaining underground and/or aboveground tank permits for the storage of combustible liquids, flammable liquids or any other hazardous materials from both the County Health Department and Fire Prevention Bureau (CFC Chapter 57 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020) 117. Site Plan. Prior to final inspection of any building, the applicant shall prepare and submit to the Fire Department for approval, a site plan designating fire lanes with appropriate lane painting and/or signs (CFC Chapter 5) 118. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 119. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 120. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 121. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 122. Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 123. Graffiti. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings or other structures must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP 124. Page 17 of 19 Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 125. Roof Hatches. Any roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 126. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 127. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 128. Public Telephones. Any public telephones located on the exterior of the buildings shall be placed in a well-lit, highly visible area, and installed with a “call-out only” feature to deter loitering. This feature is not required for public telephones installed within the interior of the buildings. 129. Employee Training. Employee training regarding retail/credit card theft, citizens’ arrest procedures, personal safety, business security, shoplifting or any other related crime prevention training procedures is also available through the Crime Prevention Unit. 130. Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. The applicant shall comply with Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.14.010, Consumption of Alcoholic Beverages in Public Prohibited. 131. Page 18 of 19 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 132. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 133. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 134. Page 19 of 19 November 10 , 2021 Attn: Hannibal Petrossi 13 00 Bristol St. N. Ste. 270 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: SAN 53 - Will Serve - WS 20210001312 - APN: 910-320-048 Eastern Municipal W ater District (EMWD) is willing to provide sewer services to the subject project. The pro visions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to pro vide proper notification when a water demand assessment is required pursuant to Senate Bill 221 and/or 610. EMW D expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for service from EMW D may also include plan check, facility construction, inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMW D's Development Services Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service, and to receive direction on the preparation of facility Design Conditions, which is required prior to final engineering. EMW D's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMW D's control. Expiration-one year from date of issue Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (951) 928-3777 , extension 4309. Sincerely, Edmund Chew Assistant Engineer Development Services Department Eastern Municipal W ater District EC:lm Board ol o.,.,c,on Ph,: p E Paul, V,,:, P,.,.J~111 J~ff /lin1>trnn9 Siepl.e" J Cu,c•n• Randy A R,,cv,d David J :, a .. sor. 2270 T rum ble Roa d • P.O . Box 8300 • Perris, C A 92572-8300 T 951.928.3777 • F 951.928.6177 ww w .em w d.org JASON E. UHLEY 1995 MARKET STREET General Manager-Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT 239781 August 19, 2021 City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Eric Jones Re: PA 21-0987, APN 910-320-048 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received August 16, 2021. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ☒ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, ________. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ☐ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. City of Temecula - 2 - August 19, 2021 Re: PA 21-0987, APN 910-320-048 239781 ☒ This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (☐Murrieta Valley ☒ Temecula Valley ☐ Santa Gertrudis Valley ☐Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issua nce of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ☐ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, ____________________. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ☐ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy SLJ:ju County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 ● RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 JEFF JOHNSON, DIRECTOR Office Locations ● Blythe ● Corona ● Hemet ● Indio ● Murrieta ● Palm Springs ● Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org February 9, 2022 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Eric Jones 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA – PA21-0987 TEMECULA EXPRESS CAR WASH DEVELOPMENT PLAN (APN:910-320-048) Dear Mr. Jones: The project listed in the subject heading is proposing a development plan for the construction of an approximately 6,240SF express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road, in the City of Temecula. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s) listed in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER This project is proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. City of Temecula PA21-0987 ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB) Prior to conducting a building permit final, the facility shall require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 358-5055 to obtain additional information regarding any additional requirements. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES – PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD/POOL FACILITY Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate food plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite “A” Murrieta CA 92563 Please contact your local DES office located in Murrieta at (951)461-0284. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim@rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Supervising REHS Department of Environmental Health I ' 1 @ R ancho later N o vem b er 10 , 20 21 Board of Directors Carol Lee Gonzales-Brady President John V. Rossi Senior Vice President Brian J. Brady Angel Garcia John E. Hoagland William E. Plummer BIii Wilson Officers Robert S. Grantham General Manager Eva Plajzer, P.E. Assistant General Manager Engineering and Operations Richard R. Aragon, CPFO Assistant General Manager CFO/Treasurer Jason A. Martin Director of Administration EIieen Dlenzo Director of Human Resources Kelli E. Garcia District Secretary James B. Gilpin Best Best & Krieger LLP General Counsel Case Plann e r City of Temecula 41000 M ain Street Po st O ff ice Bo x 9033 T em e cula, CA 9258 9-9033 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY 26478 YNEZ ROAD PORTION OF PARCEL NO.17 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 28530-1 APN 910-320-048 [SHAHRAM DEHGHANI] D e ar C ase Plann er: Ple ase be advised that the above-referenced pro ject/pro perty is located w ithin the serv ice bo un daries of Rancho Califo rn ia W ater District (Rancho W ater/D istrict ). The subject pro ject /propert y fr onts an existing 12-inch diam eter w ater pipe lin e (13 80 Pressure Zone) w ithin Prom enade M all Loop. Please refer to the encl o sed exhibit m ap. W ater service to the subject project/pro pert y exists (under Account No. 3103780, Lo catio n No. 20 171 8 1). A dditio ns or m o difications to w ater service arrangem ents are subject to the Rules and Regulations (govern ing) W ater System ~acilities and Se rvice, as w ell as the com p letio n of financial arrangem ents betw een Rancho W ater an d th e propert y ow ner. W ater se rv ice to ind ividual lo ts w ill require the ext ension of w ater fa cilities w ithin dedic ated pub lic an d/o r private right-o f-w ays. Individual w ater m eters w ill be req uired fo r each lot and/or project unit, incl uding separate w ater se rv ices/m eters fo r do m estic serv ice, fire service, and landscape irrigation serv ice, as ap plicab le. Beginn ing in 20 18, new ly constructed m ulti-unit residential structures are required to m easure the quantity of w ater supplied to each ind ivid ual resid ential dw elli ng unit. W he re private o n-site w ater fa cilities (fo r w ater service, fire serv ice, irrigation, or other purpo se) w ill cross or w ill be shared am ongst m ultiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or w here such 'co m m o n' fa cili ties w ill be ow ned and m aintained by a Property Ow ners' Asso ci atio n, Ran cho W ater requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent docu m ent of covenants, co d es, and restrict io ns. 21 \KC:rm096\F450\FEG Rane o a I ornla ater !strict 42135 W inchester Road• Post Offi ce Box 9017 • Tem ecula, Cahforma 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www.ranchowater.com • 4' ... Case Planner/City of Temecula November 10, 2021 Page Two W ater availability is contingent upon the pro perty ow ner(s) destro ying all on-site wells and signing an Agency Agreem ent that assigns water m anagem ent rights, if any, to Rancho W ater. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to Rancho Water's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. There is no recycl ed w ater currently available w ithin the lim its established by Resolution 2007- 10-5. Should recycl ed w ater becom e available in the future, the project/property may be required to retrofit its fa cilities to m ake use of this availability in accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5. Recycl ed w ater service, therefo re, would be available upon construction of any required on-site and/or off-site recycled water fa cilities and the com pletion of financial arrangem ents betw een Rancho W ater and the pro perty ow ner. Requirem ents fo r the use of recycl ed w ater are available from Rancho W ater. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of Califo rn ia Enviro nm ental Q uality Act (CEQA ) docum ents, the pro ject pro ponent should contact Rancho W ater fo r a determ ination of existing w ater system capabili ty, based upon project -specific dem ands and/or fire flow requirem ents, as w ell as a determ ination of proposed w ater fa cili ties configuration. If new fa cilities are required fo r service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact Rancho W ater fo r an assessm ent of project-specific fe es and requirem ents. Sew er service to the subject pro ject /property, if available, would be pro vided by Eastern M unicipal W ater District. If no sew er serv ice is currently available to the subject project/pro perty , all proposed w aste discharge system s m ust com ply w ith the State W ater Resources Control Board, health departm ent, and/or other requirem ents as they relate to the pro tect ion of gro undw ater quality, pursuant to Rancho W ater's G ro undwater Protect ion Policy. If you should have any questions or need additional info rm ation, please contact an Engineering Technician at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, R A N CH O C A LI FO R N IA W A T ER D IST RICT Krism a Cro w ell Senior Engineering Technician Enclosure: Exhibit Map cc: Jeff Klrshberg, Water Resources Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor 21 \KC :rm 0 9 6 \F4 50 \FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road• Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589 9017 • (951) 296·6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www ranchowatercom Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO: PA21-0987 APPLICANT: Hannibal Petrossi PROPOSAL: A Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project is exempt from further environmental review and a Notice of Exemption will be adopted in compliance with CEQA Section 15332, Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects CASE PLANNER: Eric Jones, (951) 506-5115 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: July 20, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400. City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • TemeculaCA.gov VIA-ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL CEQAProcessing@asrclkrec.com July 21, 2022 Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside P.O. Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Exemption for Planning Application Number PA21-0987, a Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. The project is located at 26478 Ynez Road Dear Sir/Madam: Enclosed is the Notice of Exemption for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) the Applicant will pay for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Exemption required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507. The payment of the $50.00 filing fee is under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Also, please email a stamped copy of the Notice of Exemption within five working days after the 30-day posting to the email listed below. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Eric Jones at email: eric.jones@TemeculaCA.gov. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Notice of Exemption Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Exemption TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 Project Title: Temecula Express Car Wash (PA21-0987) Description of Project: A Development Plan to construct an approximately 6,240 square foot express carwash. Project Location: 26478 Ynez Road Applicant/Proponent: Hannibal Petrossi The Planning Commission approved the above-described project on July 20, 2022, and found that the project is exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Exempt Status: (check one) Ministerial (Section 21080(b)(1); Section 15268); Declared Emergency (Section 21080(b)(3); Section 15269(a)); Emergency Project (Section 21080(b)(4); Section 15269(b)(c)); Statutory Exemptions (Section Number: ) Categorical Exemption: (Section 15332, Class 32, in- Fill Development Projects) Other: Section 15162 Categorical Exemption Statement of Reasons Supporting the Finding that the Project is Exempt: The project is within City limits on a site smaller than 5 acres and has been found to be consistent with the General Plan and all applicable zoning regulations Including the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan. Carwashes are a permitted use within the entire Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan area therefore impacts related to air quality have been addressed in the Temecula Regional Center Specific Plan EIR (SCN: 89020013). The project site has accommodated various commercial restaurants and is surrounded by active commercial development. All utilities are available for the use. The site has no value as habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species. Noise impacts will be mitigated by utilizing blower mufflers. With regard to water quality, the project has completed the Water Quality Management Plan process with the City’s Public Works department to ensure all current standards are met. Negative effects related to traffic are also not anticipated since the project provides queuing for up to 21 cars. Contact Person/Title: Eric Jones, Associate Planner Telephone Number (951) 506-5115 Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: 1 STAFF REPORT – PLANNING CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING COMMISSION DATE OF MEETING: July 20, 2022 TO: Planning Commission Chairperson and members of the Planning Commission FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Case Planner PROJECT SUMMARY: Planning Application No. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; PA20-1325, a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the proposed Planning Commission Resolutions recommending the City Council (1) adopt a Negative Declaration, (2) adopt a General Plan Amendment, (3) adopt a Planned Development Overlay Amendment, (4) approve a Development Plan subject to conditions of approval, and (5) approve a Tentative Tract Map subject to conditions of approval. CEQA: Negative Declaration PROJECT DATA SUMMARY Name of Applicant: Pacific West Development General Plan Designation: Professional Office (PO) Zoning Designation: Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) Existing Conditions/ Land Use: Site: Vacant, Multi Family Residential Community (Rendezvous Phase I) / Professional Office (PO) 2 North: Rancho California Road, Multi Family Residential Community / High Density Residential (H) South: Single Family Residential / Low Medium Density Residential (LM) East: Single Family Residential / Low Medium Density Residential (LM) West: Multi Family Residential Community / Medium Density Residential (M) Existing/Proposed Min/Max Allowable or Required Lot Area (Phases I & II): Density (Phases I & II): Landscape Area/Coverage (Phases I & 11): 22.97 Acres 12.88 DU/AC 56% 0.17 Acres 7.0-12.9 DU/AC 25.0% Minimum Parking Provided/Required (Development Plan): 280 Parking Spaces Proposed 280 Parking Spaces Required BACKGROUND SUMMARY In 2002 the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) was approved and adopted by the City of Temecula City Council. On February 1, 2017, the applicant withdrew a previous Development Plan application on the project site that proposed an approximately 65,100 square foot commercial center consisting of nine (9) buildings. On January 3, 2018, Planning Application No. PA16-1427, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 160 unit apartment community was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission. That project was Phase I of the Rendezvous project and is fully constructed and occupied. On May 24, 2018, the owner of the project site presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of former Councilmembers Jeff Comerchero and Mike Naggar. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit. On September 22, 2020, staff presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of Mayor Matt Rahn and former Councilmember Mike Naggar. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development submitted Planning Application No. PA20- 1323, a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation 3 of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); PA20- 1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; PA20-1325, a Development Plan for a 134 unit market rate apartment community built on 7.61 acres; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. On May 26, 2022, staff presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of Councilmembers Maryann Edwards and James Stewart. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit and the Fiscal Impact Analysis. Staff has worked with the applicant to ensure that all concerns have been addressed, and the applicant concurs with the recommended Conditions of Approval. ANALYSIS The project is located on the “Lower Site” of the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5), generally located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive on an undeveloped lot. The project is for the construction of a 134 unit apartment community. The project consists of six (6) three-story residential buildings, one (1) two-story building that contains an enclosed garage on the first floor and residential units on the second floor, and seventeen garage buildings. There are 56 one-bedroom units that range in size from 651 square feet to 779 square feet, 42 two-bedroom units that range in size from 1,163 square feet to 1,257 square feet, and 36 three- bedroom units that range in size from 1,341 square feet to 1,431 square feet. There are two points of vehicular access to the project. There is a main access point on Rancho California Road as well as via an existing private drive directly to the west of the project. The project is required to provide 280 parking spaces for the project per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The project proposes 280 parking spaces including 22 guest parking spaces. Community amenities associated with Phase II include a pool/spa area, playground, bbq area that includes a fireplace and covered picnic area, turf area, bike racks, exercise room, pet area with a pet drinking fountain, and a mail/package room. Architecture The residential buildings are patterned after the Barchessa Loredan, located in Selva de Montello, Italy which is of Palladian architecture and will match what was constructed in Phase I of the project. The architecture elements of the proposed buildings include a two-story loggia with supporting columns, hip roof, and unadorned windows. Materials include stucco, chiseled limestone, smooth limestone, and clay roof s-tiles. 4 Landscaping The project (Phases I & II) provides 56% landscaping on the project site, which exceeds the minimum 25% landscape/open space requirement of the Medium Density Residential zone. Plant types include Coast Live Oak, Sky Rocket Juniper, Fan Palm, Agave, Red Yucca, Oregon Grape, Star Jasmine, and Rockrose. Tentative Tract Map The proposed Tentative Tract Map will allow for the consolidation of eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The consolidation will allow for the entire project, Phases I & II, on one parcel under the same ownership. The Tentative Tract Map meets all the development standards of the City of Temecula Municipal Code and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. General Plan Amendment A General Plan Amendment (GPA) is proposed to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use Professional Office designation on the “Lower Site” of the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay to a Medium Density Residential (M) Land Use. The GPA is needed to allow residential development on the “Lower Site” as the current Professional Office Land use does not allow for residential development. Planned Development Overlay Amendment The project is proposing an amendment to the existing Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay. The proposed amendment includes language specific for multifamily housing as it relates to the design guidelines and development standards, revisions to the planning area boundaries and naming convention, and removing the allowance of all other land uses other than multifamily residential. The amendment includes: - Changing the name of the Planned Development Overlay from Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay to Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay - Reducing the number of planning areas from three (3) to two (2) and renaming them from “Sub Area A, B, or C” to “Upper Site” (Phase I) and “Lower Site” (Phase II) - Increasing the number of allowed residential units from 160 to 294 to account for the already constructed Phase I (160 units) and the proposed Phase II (134 units) - Removing development standards and design guidelines that pertained to commercial or office development. - Limiting the height of structures along the eastern setback adjacent to the single family residential development to 16’-0” - Removing an access point to the project site from Rancho California Road - Removing the signage program as it does not pertain to a multifamily development 5 Growth Master Plan/Community Benefit On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Plan (GMP) which is intended to serve as the City Council’s policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures in the City of Temecula. The GMP applies when projects involve specific land use decisions including General Plan Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments. Consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the proposed project is required to provide Community-wide public benefits that provide substantial added value to the entire community and citizens of Temecula commensurate with the scope of the project to fulfill the requirements of the City’s GMP. The Community-wide public benefit, as recommended by the City Council Ad Hoc Infill Land Use and Project Review Subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Maryann Edwards and James Stewart for the project is a $500,000.00 payment to the City of Temecula which will in turn be used by the City of Temecula for city-wide projects that benefit the residents of the City. The payment shall be made prior to the issuance of the first residential multi-family or commercial building permit for the project. Fiscal Impact Analysis The City’s fiscal policies requires that a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) be completed for any development that proposes an increase in residential density from what is currently allowed in the General Plan. The project proposed a change in land use from Professional Office to Medium Family Residential allow for residential development. The FIA is to evaluate the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the project by estimating the fiscal impact on the General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed project over a 20-year time period. If the FIA determines that the increased cost to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the project area will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the project (“City Services Deficit”), the project shall be conditioned to require the payment of funds to the City for negative impact on the General Fund, that is, the project shall be conditioned to pay the City the loss to General Fund revenues created by the project as determined by the FIA. The applicant prepared a FIA in compliance with this requirement. The FIA found that the project would result in a City Services Deficit. The project is being conditioned to require that the owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. 6 The project condition provides that the Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Community Meeting On October 20, 2020, a community meeting was organized by the applicant and held virtually via zoom with both a weblink and call-in option provided to the surrounding residents and neighbors within a 600-feet radius of the project. Staff attended this meeting along with five (5) residents. There were no questions, comments, or concerns raised by the residents that attended. LEGAL NOTICING REQUIREMENTS The notice of the public hearing was published in the Press Enterprise on July 7, 2022, and mailed to the property owners within a 600-foot radius. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION Staff has reviewed the project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared under staff’s direction by Ascent Environmental, Inc. and was distributed to responsible agencies, interested groups, and organizations. The 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021, and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The Final ND has been provided to the Commission. FINDINGS General Plan Amendment Consistent with the Government Code section 65358, the Planning Commission must make a finding that the General Plan Amendment is in the public interest. The current General Plan designation for the project site is a Professional Office (PO) land use as specified in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it allows for high-quality residential development in an area surrounded by residential development that would help to fulfill the City’s regional housing needs, including the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. This General Plan amendment allows for residential use where it otherwise would not be permitted 7 Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal 1 Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community’s labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Development Plan (Code Section 17.05.010.F) The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment the project site will allow for a multifamily residential community. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare. The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. 8 Tentative Maps, Development Code Section 16.09.140 The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 38043 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Municipal Code, and the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the Development Code, General Plan, and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The proposed Tentative Tract Map combines eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel for residential development. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) (SCH# 2021050549) was prepared. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. 9 The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on developed and vacant property and does not propose any grading or construction. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision design and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project prior to the recordation of a Final Tentative Map. ATTACHMENTS 1. Aerial Map 2. Plan Reductions (Development Plan) 3. Plan Reductions (Tentative Tract Map) 4. PC Resolution – Negative Declaration 5. Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution 6. PC Resolution – General Plan Amendment 7. Exhibit A - Draft City Council Resolution 8. Exhibit A - Amended General Plan Land Use Map 9. PC Resolution – Planned Development Overlay Amendment 10. Exhibit A – Draft City Council Ordinance 11. Exhibit A – Planned Development Overlay Amendment 12. PC Resolution – Development Plan 13. Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution 14. Exhibit B – Draft Conditions of Approval 15. PC Resolution – Tentative Tract Map 16. Exhibit A – Draft City Council Resolution 17. Exhibit B – Draft Conditions of Approval 18. Final Negative Declaration (ND) with Appendices can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/CEQA 19. Fiscal Impact Analysis 20. Notice of Determination 21. Notice of Public Hearing MIR A L OMAD R AGENAST R A N C H O C A L I F O R N I A R D S A N T A CECILIADRCOSMIC DRESCOLACATADRHUMBER DRL O N G VA LLE Y DR MORAGARDROANOAKE STM A R G A R IT A R D Project Site CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-1325 0 400 800200 Feet\ Date Created: 6/8/2022 1:5,4001 inch = 450 feet 944-370-001 The map PA20-1325.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis O W N E R /A P P IIC A N I i£HOC1\'CIU$M,U-fAWlYIP 1J10.DI04IIA-.f:,f81 ::~.t~r~k ~,~~.ca, .EHlilljlli Ol!C[IIQM:[~illG,.it. lt0$. IUSPltl.lCSR0.,SUl1( 110 ~~=~":J.}l'ia ,~~~~re~ IJ.QQD.-ZQllE ll!CWIO~O!llKSWIM'.Yllt:S [Nl-.tLY .. -noooltfl£Y {UNSIIAO(O~ICIICOCSO!leCOAS "Mf o\S O(JU'IU;!O 10 BC 0.,Jg()( IH( 0.t!I AIH.IAI. CWJ,C£ flOOO' POI ~~:~~~~ ::a rr {f\l!W) - 0$06$01JOC:.OAIEDAUWS118,100I. STRffI APPRfSSES lOOOJ . xio,~ .lOllJ, .l01», Jl'»01, .l011t, J0rn.•J010•Al!CMO CAl.ll'<:fiW.RO. rxlSTING ZOHIHG OtSIGHATtoH CITY OF TEMECULA PROPOSED SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 SUl-o\.UAS'A.s.•c·orlUIHl:D OEYRDNENI IMIII.AY(POO-$) EXISUHG GEHERN- PU.N DESIGHAUoH (Ptl) PROl (SSICW<W.OfTU {A•B) (11)11(0,Ulll!(S,'O(NIIAl.(HJDU/ACl!E)(C) EICISTIHG UHP USE VACANJ/CIIJJ)(O PROPOSCP I AND USE (11)11[0UIIRC$10CNIIAL(HJ)DU/AC•E Site Plan lnforn1ation Cross Rct·Cr£_nc.£_ lo========D=A=T=A=T=A=B=L=E========si 1",u~~. Ad.•e .. , l'h<ne ~nd l-ln:111 f,~. ~::~::· Ing•••..-, F'wj ...-n JO "'"'' l.'"-'l<l"'7"f',:Arch•n1 All l'IJH 1-~..:<h C,nrh,c S<-4k With 1i11 Mak arwl lforfl ,\tn,\\ AO I v",~"> Maj> ~11.-1 h•~::J:rur,:ny l.i>< ,nl'Oldaoklbt,,,~ olld,n1,;n"'""'"~•-•~ml l<""""'-'""J1.l1rnc1,lc1hofoll,·,i"i'V'rnl~•~••""-~"""" n,nhll c,,~••lrdn,·n.<l l\~r-, ... -J fol 1;,..,. o,d d,DKr;.IU;'L•, .r~,r1..,o1~~. ,\I.! r.,1,•1o •e:,r,J b N l1he 11:in,11""n,n b.l.h l1<•11 •111~•1"") lmc> ,\I! l.<..:it..,.,J;J1fi,.,n1>....,-,(;>!tt1i,_,11g111Jj•h'1"-"of-.i>1'\l<.l:I.-S. 14; k<l>O¥ h,ul~•~~ ><•~~ l.,-..,""'•~1.l,Ju,,c11>1<..,of.dllonJ,e.'l•r.J!Jnd1..J<>111.11, .. .i l,rn )·•,.ha.k•I! ,\I! l,oc>1 in<1Jr.J 1)ri<>ltl,,.._n.,on,>fdrin •1•!<,.l,"111•n,1<<1n "°'I f''A"'l'•••II• N'A lucoii,,1111•f n ..,1ing11tt d ~•<'f".;,-J ,.,,.;,., fad ,,.,,l, ,\J.!,l\.hll l,xo, .. 1n Jr.'1 J u»<,_.,fill rn,,h on d o...,«•lhUrn "'>"I ~~~-VERTICAL ~[1A1NINC WALL •• .,.,.,.,. .. .,.,..,1,0APAlHOf IHA~t0[1AII.$ PERUCIITECTSPLAH5 0 P.tJIUIGSIAl.lCOUtll @-occORAIMCOietf'l[Pl~LAIIOSCA.PlAROtl(CISPLAM ~,i.. ... , ,1,,...,,,.; .. ,. 1,,-.t11<>111>l1-11,1,l.:"•l•"·'"'J""ll"-.p.-,.~II { l'·~-C.l .J lk n1i1y :.II 11111,IJ t."••~~-- W1>1,ru,o,,.,1<l t1 .. ,,,~.11>1, .... 1·~?,l.,t,,,~.-- l'h,""'t.."t, 11v ,,c 1no 1J,.., .... ..i .•n n o,f) lt>l'"'<>h,,K' •)<!,.,,._ oo l lo,.-~""'I"" ~u,l,h:,~, Al l,,\).Jf l>li>lb.J,k><.i..,,,, 1 ....... ~ 1 .... ~(1111 !~~1 ,.,1, 1, .. 1, .. """' .i:,. ....... .l ll r,n )f,..,«l1~N "''"tf"t ""'".,'" \I .1,,1 I 1 .. ,.,,~., l)'llo.'""'I k'lvl" ,,1 ~II""-' r, f.'11\1ntt1~I r-,,~,tnw 1,~,,. t If.~ ( IJ• I I •..-~Ii•"' Ol ~•""IBJ•f l"l\"'"">l (,r,- hJ~fJnr< t,'Hllln~lfu( ('f <~•,•• ••~l~Ul,,1o"•i lhl\!1!h<l>,1i1'1,n, ll'•!.lll,.1 l.o>.:tl0'11"1•'""1n,,1p,o,,....,,Jl',).1hd1<'11M·\'.th,• I\J •~.(u .; llio.llt k·ol<'l<rk1cll<-,.l 1"h,.,.,1;.,1;rt:lt><h>.:•liN<• N,,\ l'..ic i.><J!oun,: • Th ~v ""~ 'f'l""'t,I t1 f-f,,.,.• IO •~•"l":>~11,111) S"ll!•I 1N01o •~• h hd !H!co~,r~uJe11,,,.K '"""'·~ r•J11<,l11,._n,~J11 <!d ,,o) ..,..i o.b1,cJhl.-. ftu,,,i.:cll~•"''I' ,d11cka..~ 1.,~,•1loo ,rJ Jinit11<iun ot ~u "q:1, MIi fro.~ L"•.1iu<1"t..Jl"1lllo.1<,1r-.,.t,,.,.,. .. }~l"'k"l¥a"•1>. trn-.OJ ~I .,J,...,.nai1•a1.,,1yl,,..,,,.,uu11$0l"'''rlhc11o.11m,,1,,.of1l1C ,\Wf.-.,lpruf>,,'1) t\lU.Sll!•I ~,>11J1,t.,.dt<1,1mJ,W'IJU<Of"'1J1<011>1A·oh i,..,__,,~.,fh•fl'"i'~lh(l~"i~""-JJ .l 11t i<•11 "1:b l>,~1luN:.,\,11A ll,\J<ll <C•"bl oouu 1<,io · rul>li<nglu,,f\\o)·• I rJ.h l..ncl.,,u,~1 Pa,i,i"l:Spa,.~ ~.k,~n~ ,·,,i,.,i., (11.,,111, •f<b-.:;.1p,"f"IK<l ,~ r..,-, 1,-.~1""'11 foll o , .. 1"tlaioJrrurcANS1n:c1l.18'""<"'<1 ... .,,,.,..} ,,.i..,cki<ot t,I Sll.-1 ~-cf ~1,l~~r"'""i"° 1\HSl1«1, l).)l~s, .. r:;.,,p,-,,""r,J ,\h,1,s n ,..1 1J;,o 4 1;,1,i., 1.:,,\ ~n .. 1 APN,: 944,)70.001, 944.)7~01, 9«•110.«6. 944.)70-007, 9H,J70-0DII, ~H.]10-010. 9H,J70--01?, lltnl Ail~~:~,',~ll • IO b< no<r&<dmloonc V"'"cl i11 p&1 I o(!hn 11>Vb..,.bon llnkno .. nollhi1hmol ua.io .. ..-;ption: l',o,.ch 1.),6. 1,1, IU. U,,11.I llofl'.,,cl M"P JIU?l, U,pRook ll6..l'"f1<111U" ll1u1l1rCnyolTu_o,J,_ Co,.,1\·ollliY<11>dc.S1.iool('ahlo<N" 1..alftf : PJ.u,cdO,•.-,!opmoNO.at,y(PllCH) GoN n lPlo•lh •f&""U."' M«bwnDau1lyR,,11J,nl,,,\(MJ t:llfllft&/Propon•Lo Nl l!o.: F.ki ,1"""•\·._ • .,.. ,.,.::;~:.•d~M..inr,1n0Jy11,.,.i.nn.i r .. t.110, ... ,A>,. l,IM>.Jt;,r 219JAI.Jn Tot.al),.dAI,,. 'lll t,M l,f u t~M ,,, T•l•IH..WlftcArn:(~cc~1, ... ,1.().?futlle1.,!<) TollllAo,l,~A,<11•llf,Vl9ol i...1c .,·,n 11 : R11!cltngoA1<a•lOl,lll1f Lui Ale~• lll.lLI If Thn,lo10tolCovet<i1<"101,lll/lll,1C~•Jl¥o u w vf«d P-u lo uean..tp nv,,.:;r,·, L.,,..,,S,te(Th11l'l"l'"'.ol) f].(Ml,f 11,~Wl lll ,IUI •2S% 1. .... 1a,1:'!"!..,,1 0p .,,su.-.·0C""'•• (lJl.101•101.ISll•lf>.IU)IJll,IOI •41% ,,~, ... -u..11,, 'Uppa•Pon1on• l<,t,U,.11(,K"""'~1a<11on) 'L""~ I'"'~""• IH U111l1 (lhi< p,upu ul) T<>1al l'rupu«J •2i4U,~t• n 4 UN!o/ll 12A « .. • 12 u n .. ~UU1f1UN\1P., ""'· ... R«p.D1<d ll«11>1al UnCoY«<d (fo«I ~... ~ ·- " " "" " . 0 7 " .. " w ,, T"'.JP•ti11j1llrqaulJ ?~O c .... cud.Unt.'u,·ercd~d00<,1 '•onbeoof/\<t<rnble! .11:<ol'to•iJ,d ltod'1<kdinTo!.lhAb"'·• •G 'L11nb•r•n1<>101cydcl',11ti S •ur,·.,.,,kd•~ Tot..ll'J1ting!p""••P1ovidcd11iO u,,·cr<J,UnwnnJ,,-,Jll11rot o,.-,1-,•Cb1111ko tloWC••1rwliHT,-po(Thi 1Pu,p1>1.,) Sn\ll.1Ulr 0.:<Li..,,,fi.,..r,.,., C,;n11M._b.,,1Trpc Sprinl.Jcro/Al•m ls'1sruba-Sl.,,i•• 11..:~ Apannicnl1 k-1 TypcS.-\ Y•• l 1'7-11' o""t!" T)']><'B ~•o c.,.,,,, T);,cSO 11•~• H~m,,.M0<>n1 ly)'cSA 18'41• J AUIIKU,IIIU!INWCIIAOlJS Ollf~S(lHSMEJl'll:lf.lllMNiOORil'I: i.15U ltl.iH'WII •DTH 10 II[ 24'. l. lll(PA0.(Cll!IU.UiCtU0£S.O,.,IJI P.ui[lSIIOUh'IEO{JjlHCROOfSOf Tl( AP AII N EN I 8Ul a.N C5. t. :.J~=~r:i~=>iG smicws(l'IC.SlM-{JjlHE ~~l~~~ .sJ!EllJJilW! PIOPOSlDSIIEl'tAII SI[-! EMTJ;~ PR0.lCT SU( PHOlOS STr-1 SYMBOi lfGEHD· (A$1[A!lll!MOl'AlMIUOtST1t,CI u10m111B1.c110. PUIRIS,CAliJ)IO (U1)918-l1TI RANCHO CAtl'DRMA 1A!(~ 4Ul51'JO!(Sl[RH0 IIll[ClU,CA92~ {Ul)JM-6900 SOCAl.1,.1,SCOl&P~, INll.lUGOIIA tllOWIO$.CA91J14 (11l)lH-1100 IICHfUCOllll!IMCA!DiS tS.41HSl. MOLANO S.CAUlU (IIM )J»-lm SQIIHERNCAU'DRIU.[OISON JH8'PUlfif'OR llllOOt,IA .. CAU~U {l)l)JU-8.lOl ~,- 1"' a:NIRIJ. Al'L llllU90l,CAl1~ (JJJ )m -Mlt l EASEMENTS ANO DEDICATION NOTES 0 ~::r~A~:A= :ll=1~p~~o: = =~\,:0 ~NIAL ~S. l'CJI JiSIIMl(NI NO. IOUl, 1!£COROE0 APJ!I. It, © =t ~~it~ :r:~~ ~~C::J~ ~J~ (ll~IICY 'oOtCUS. PAlllll W/11' 3101). P.ut ns 1-e.. PIii J16/&0 •91 ® ~rt~t~:~~~~r~ ::: n: :-J=~c::ti~ ~ l!EOP.1/0CAL lNtl!fSS o\.'iO ElilUS. PU PAACCl 111.P J10l3. ~Alla'.\S 1-9., Pll.8 216/IO-a, ® ~"::f~ 0(,:-';~~:, ~li:,r p~~~-fr ~~:,:.1t LOOP PA20-1325 z 0 .= u :::, ~ U") z 0 u "' 2 0 z 10/11/ll CHCotfD:tN ORAWN:IMI • Pllo..£CTHO.: .... SHCCIMNlflfit, ST E-1 EX IS TI N G S IJ E PHOTO LEGEND sc.1iu:,1·-,oo· PHOTOl17: lOOKINO(ASrlll.Yrlla.lON-SlllNE,U NOlllllt(STCOl!N CJI PHOTO tn;l OOII U.-O EA Srlll.Y "1.0H G SOIJ TH ur.ot-Of-WORI( PHOIOf7:LIIOIONOIIESrlll.YntOYON-51TCl;[MI MOR THR/W PHOTO f12: LOOICIN C M:SJ'RlY Al.ON<: lfO!I TH R/W l'HOl0f2: LOOICIN!;SOU T\f'III.YfROM SOU TH EA ST COR N[R l'f!0101J:lOO,CINOW£SJ'RlYfR01,1SOUMASTCORN[R PHOTOl9:lOOK INOM:STRLYfR0t,ION-sm:NEAR NO!IT>IR/W RICMI or WAY/PROl'ERTY LINE ,,. e-0 PKOIOYl(W/OIR(CTION PHOT0f1$:LOOklHC SOU JH'RI.YfROW NORDfW[5lCO!tN lR PHDTOf11: LOOIOH0NOIITM'11lYrllDlfSOUTH'WUJCOiUfUI PHOTO f.», Ul(llCINOSOU ni'III.YAI.OHOSOIJ lH UIIIT-01"-IKIR ( PA20-1325 r ~ J z 0 B :::, ~ V) z 0 u "" 2 0 z 10/11/U CIICCUO;IJ'I ~AW.MAI STE-2 Q( 2 5Hl(1S RENDEZVOUS APARTMENT COMMUNITY PHASE II A diacent Lan d U ses 11·<11 M,Jmn,u,,..,1>·krnd:n11al(M ),c•n~,,r•p»1rn<1U<onu,"""'Y Sou.I, Low M"\Jur11U,n.11y l«al.mluJ (LMJ, ,,o,lu"' W"!llc·f•r,uly ,..,.i,,,.,., ~ .. 1 Low M«bU1nO,na,t,, l<1id<nll.J(L1!),,»on11&"l\ll<•fo11uly1<1i.lo-n<<1 ),,'o,th(ac,001ku,,:i.,c;,wr kd) I\J~hCu111lyl.u"lcnnol,(E)oparnT1<t<co!llll..,.ly D A T A TA B L E AP ~,: 1144-HIH'UL, 1144-~J'U.U,S, 11~4-~W-OJ6, ll44-)7ll-00 7. 114'1-l71!«1l, 1144-HW!I!,!. 1144-Hll-O ll, 944 -)71!,t 'l l - lu b< m <r M•J ,n l,J onc pu«I .. p.irt oftlu 1 apph<a l!un St rt o!A dd rt 11n : Unkno w n Mltlw t1m , l..cg:o.JD~..,;pli<>n : P=<I• 1, S, 6, 7. I, 10, 11, 11nJ l)ofPar«J MapllOB. Mlp Book 116. 1'3&C110.l:II 1n1hcC1lyofTcru«Wl. C<Juntyofll1vm idc,S1atcofCahfo1nu z ... 1,., PlonncJl>.otopmcntO.·nt.ytPIXl•S) G,no,.J Pkn Dni&nallon: Mtdium !JcM11y llu1J,:nt1M 0,..i) Eidotln&l'Pnpoudl.andltM: Ex,1q ~ V o,ant Pan:~~:,7" m ~lultif>tn ,ly Rnido:n~l Tul..\l G ruu .-1..o l,tlW ,)97r f U l/7,\,;rn ToL.I ! ?,,'ct ,\tu 99-1 .119 1 • f H 12 A<ln Total Bul ldl,. An a: (Sn Sh«I A(J..l fo1 Oct.1111) T<1Ul1Bwkh"1A1<a•l21,9J91f Lot C o,,.,,,g,: fhu!Wlll!,Alu•ll/1,141,r Lul,\J ca •ll l,ID l1f Thm fo ,c Lui C ,.,·••>&• • IO l,l◄ll]Jl,W I • ll¼ L1,.,:uver «IPar lr.1111j and D1i>'<W >VI 1 . .,,.crS 11<(T h.i 1Pr opa nl) l1.I N 0 1 f 11,691Yl )L,IOl •lm l.andl ,-ap"lll anJ OpcnSP!"•Cov••M• l))l,ll•·W l,19 1-16.J 6S)/lcl U UI •4)¼ Pn pou dDt n,lty: "Upp<r•P...t w n•l6U l'Nb(,n ,.,n11lut l""') •tow c1'P <>1 11on •l)◄llru11Wi,1propoial) ToWPr"P(l «d •194U ru ll 19 4 l'ru Wl l 12 A m ,• 11 II D w <lltf\11 U ru l1 Per A ct< f'11 rk1n : U M Type 1t ofU ni 11 Rc<r,i iml lt<qu,r cJ lt<quiJ cd P,cvidcd Pr ov iJ,d O.,n1<d lJnC uvm:d Cuvcr,J UnCuv<1eJ S .ocn S••«~ S o1<:u o,Jr...,.., '"'' " " ., " TIII.\I P .v k"'I R<p cd llU ·eo,c,ed.UnCo•oc«dond Oun 1 •..,.,b,:,o fA«u ,,blcS .,,.,.,p,o.,.J,:J [nd i.do:d in T Dl.ol.l •A bo vc •6 'um b<r ofMolotcy clc Park"" S!)lo,O l'fovlil,J • 6 ., n " II 11 T11W P .ir kina Sp..:n Pr .,..idc d 210 I (Courcd, U111:o.-.«d. .....i ou .. 1 O «upa n<y C la u ln caUon,' C oiu 1ru o lon Typ, (T ht1 Propaul) Struc l\1/e O«Clamfi<>llon Con1lruc l1011Type Sprlrlk lcu/Alorm 1"'um b<r Sl<\11e1 llc'l!llt ,\pAAm enls R-2 Typc!iA l l9-11' O at 'i « l' fypc:lll 11·.1u• C.:ar pa n , U Type:i ll 11'.(l" TypdA Yn Scone of W ork Sheet Index Leu ! Description 'Ph.1 1<1'ollhc RenJc z-.0111Ap "ltm<nLColli mu,rulyu-.:li.do:olhc cor1>lf\ll;!IO<IOf1i,; th,u .,lory Aparlm <nl Bw JW<\jl 1, • 011<➔lory Ap,1nnun1 R"11wni!: ,;wc1 • ,.,,.i. 1losy 11"•11•· • •11'1111< 1\cl)' fu:<rme/Pool B•Woom R111IWljl , • m•illoom •tYch<d to• 1"'1 1• 1\ory Jl•f"tt <,<W\Lc<non 111 >l<li:s.11 ot <'("""•"'ilh •t1•ch<JTr"'hE,.,.lu11n 1and unow 1lh aMC ,t.,,ry •p.nm ,nt bwlilint;i un ,). fo ·c <;IIJl llfU, a ,wi,umU'\il puol :t11d 'Jl•. d,,.·,.•,y1, udc,~alkL .ind I.Lrllk c"Jping S,tc lmp1u,·omM11 ncC<l>'"'Y Lo 111ppun and allow 11,,. ph>JCCI ll\!:l...r.1m ihn&,in,11ol l.111,,nuh 111h!lu ,M.J cu,u 1M ·li<>11 ufn1i1«1J,111<u11S ,..,.u,,f,n<.u.11 1c hah,.,,.,., 111i&•lkln sy,n,~,,. IO'.llcr ..,,J IC\Hf lino, .,,.,Ji draul.ljl< pl,111 ..... 1...i.u,, ..,,,,.,..,m ,nl1 nc «lcJ loac,-um o>d,oi c W Q MP ,,~uucm cnl! The Sile ln1pro.,mcn\1 fur 1h11 pruJ<<l 11c 1<> h, ,..,....,ph&hc d unde r 1<par>t c pctm 111 .,,J >« ..,,mbcJ in 11n1<r ol.:u,I un lhc C ,.·1J£n&iAi:m ,111 ,and L ~•p••\J •lll tc,h.,<ll r•w ing , A ccessiblitv N otes CBC 1102 ,\ l stlln !M t whe n <un 1td<1 11\1 the nun 1b<1 uf AIT ESSlBLli IP.I,'] fS ~1>lmus1b,pru•1il<J.lh.l tlhcno111bcrufuru11un 1hc11row,Jflullrlc•elufoll rnulcnli>lbw\d,"111hallbccon11dt,cJlog,lhcr.Forilwl<11n&11nlhoo 1clcula11, Cllt;ll0 2A l rcqw,e1 lh.L<10 lm lh;i/\JO¼oflhc 1oulnum b<1ofgro lllld n00< ...,II, b~\,nno ,·•1< lcuth.n J Ul\llmlitl ,otn pl)•thc thc •p•.,fwpto•i11oruofCAC 11112 A l l (<g cntr...,.c1.puwdcrr"""'. ,t,) Th<t< .,. 7bw.1Jing,;w,lh~t.>U 1 ..t441N1111J lloorWU1 1 lll'/o ,>f4'1 11111 ts rUlll'Jl up 1uS uni u w h,c hm u,1bc c1111 11ni<lcd 1umc,1 lhcsc 1<qwr cn1<nll T" 1111 w c •""1 1 x,., .. Acu n ib lc Uru to Nnbcendi1trib111<dam ""tl lll.l.&:)bcJroomt1\lll}'Jl<I (J)U ,u tl)pcM -J Bw lJ.nij #II U1111•11 (l)U ru tT )"p< IC Bw lJ.ni!MU Urultl6 (l)U ni 1T 1pc 2,\ Bw lJ ,ng ltll Uru t#l7 (l )U ni tT )'p< I,\ flw kl ,ng MIJ lJni l#LJ {l1Uni1TypelA llwl<l,"11 #l) Sound Level Tlu.l p10Je<1 11ou111Jcthc CNEl.65J.£l eolllu1& II Site Plan Info rm ation Cro ss Refe rence Dcoc ,iption Nam •.,\dJr •11 ,Phc ne .,.J 1im ~1lfo , ,\jlpli<.ui1 Al chi tc,1 E"l!inc" V.oputyOw ncr Londs ,·,pc Ar ,h,t«I All Plat\ Shc:<1, u,,phi> Scale W,lh Bu S,·•I• anJ N"orlh A.now A f,L \'1<1NtrM.ap STE-1 1'.><1olu'W ProputyL,rw:,nboldand labc l1IIJom ons1M1 (mc1<1and ..... STE-1 1.o,;•I""" an.I .i.m ,ns,ono 0(1ll ex11 llfll anJ p1opo 1<d ,.,,m,nu (&"1lhllc.:ord1cfmn..'C) STE•l P1opa9cJJo1hne1,.,,,.,.Wffl cns1oru,,r•ppli<•bk A L l !J<l1n,;•tc lllld !.r bd thc m inun 11111 1clb-..k,from ~Jl prop,:lly hnn A L l Lo,;•honllrld dun cnuonof~llcx"111'11 ,n,J propa,ed,!ruc.luu,. ino.h,J.1T11 bw ld1T11 l<lb•d:, l.oc a\1on.,.J JuTI •111 ionof~lll.uiJo ,ap111j1 .uill p«J<1 lm 11 w•llu••r•(oh.w.:d) Al 2 Lo,,a1wn.,.J 1ypi,:alJun ,,..,onor<lr .. •~11 l,,,kM d111j1 ro 11<1""'1 p.,king ,Lall, NIA J.o,c•l111 n uf riu,11rt1 ""'1 prupu•d ON!le f11<l l.ir1lr.J A ll,,\~-JI 1..,,,·•,::n ..,::...,wm c111 ,un.,rallll'•Vl •nr:l,,.u,01 (1n 1cr iu r•nd L•I L""·ahonurm,,.,um ciu1p {U'"lll'W ,.,,J PJ..,po1<d) ct '-2.C l'•l lok m 1fy ail lw l~yl.-;;111_,.,,, W~lc1mctc,(1) El«lm•lbo.>x u C.blcb.,xc1 Pl'alnl:bu x« N"/A !IV,\Ctl'IUllu..">!!eJon r""f) :-IA Pl'wtu>'ult.o1<ry11,m1rw1l.,.-•trJ1rn~u,IJll\jl , A l l,A ).Jl ).l,,lbu>;l.,,, .. tiun1 NIA Tr>lh l<><>li<>n• (Src Tuuh Enclusw u ab..Ye) AHpro p,m Jpub hcin1 prO'{cn,c n11 Sl.-l-SLl J.u,:a1"'n. trpc Mil h,1ght .. r'i,ll 1trecl, porbng ""~ p,,<lr:ll>w, hghls t.:t'-1, CU -l 1..,,,-,,1..,n 11f c1<1 1LL11g "' p1up11 1<J ru , hyJr w , wlllun ~ uf J>SOJ<ClanJ40 fcc1away(romlhc hwlillna CL'•l,CI J-l Lo..-.!oo nofe1<1 1hngo1p1opo 1<J~11lnJi , .. 1<,r\·a1v• CL'-1, ClJ .J Doub le Jc1<.lor ,11<,t nJn1 for for< line lo,;:alioo, N IA Gale locauon1 • Thc K "·or e :yprovcd ,n Ptwe I (Un<Dlllll\lo:IIDn) ST-I C,.<'ll c If?/ b b<] IN<IIOI and utcnor hlfN "I 1:ad,111 dun cn,1011< OI cntty and J11nar1lc1fo1cmui1<ney vcludca.."c11 L-S Lo.-•loon and duri ciu ,...,c,fal lw aU1anJ (cnr:u STF.,1 Lo..'i1hono(1llruu.:t,.u,dr1v,11oy1,p>.1k~>.1e:1.1.trcuond :W JOLnUljj prop el!~ hnu .. -uh.in 50 f«I oflh< pcnmclu orlhc suhjw pzop,ny AO l,ST-1 ZOllllljj an.l tx1ot11111 1ar11.J 111 eof1Ji1«nlp11 e<I , NIA Ptw 111jj ofhcp10J<C!(1fpropo1cJ) STF..l Am ,110111 w,lh 11, .. b1h11n A" (.\DA) a,c,;c!liblc 1outc, 10 En~..,.,., l'ub lic1ia htuf\\'1y1 ·rr.u hH ndoo\.f <I l'»kir,i Sp:1>.u F.lccln.V,luc lcelw 1'"11 •Pa....:1(p<op<>1edorfulare) 1..,,,.,.tw nof1Ucx 1ll"'ll ond pr opos <dS1re<L l,ehl:1(1ndo.1:.C an y tobcrcb:>leJ STl l-1 N om eofuhL1ty p=•~• AU Shc cll D11<S 1\cP lan }'i cp11 eJ AO l,S Tli -1 Dat.o T ab le AUi TN,Contl'"<I• ,\02 Pr "Jet !Sl..i l1>1lli Al I Ovcr~II s,1e p1.,. Al 2 luwc1S1tcl'l.ui All Upp,:rS11<P/.111 Urutl'!""' lJru1Plllll Al.O J ewldinf; o flws 1•un., Al.02 Bu1ldinil llFL<.>us l'Luu Al.{\4 llwl<llna llf.l,v.11;.,,,. Al •ll l llwl<llna llf.....,,l'IJ,u llwl<llna llflol.lf l'Luu ,\J.]l~I 8wlJinc llF.lcnti.,,.. AJ .1142 8w1Jint;llf.lcuuon, AJ .11 8ldt;IFIIPlnl,S,-1,atW likv>11Dn.1 Al.Jl Hw ld,r,g Jfloor Planl Al-Jl Hwl<Wl&JFloor PW'II Al-14 Hwl<Wl&Jliknuons ,\}.Kl H..cr,;,ickoocu Al-ll Poo lD alhr oon,Plr'll,See,&Hl c\' Al-Ml Oar-.rcPIM1 AJ.).1 2 O>.r-.rcSe.:uo111and lilc••llo111 AJ.),,i4 Tra,hlinr:lo:fw<O>t<Dc1•1I A 6 l Color lilcvauon, Mite rial Jl.oarJ A6l Bw l.lir;oi O C olo1Elcv ot1= A6J Bw~].\Colorlil<>'OII,.,.. Dw~),\t.:olorEJcv•II= A6) ew1.i.....11eolorF.ltV>IIDfll A66 Bldg l,).t..lltm .0111,1uColot A7 Stykt.:om ,,_1,onSh«I Ell S1tc l"1>1 "'1 Plan Pho 1orn ,;1t,c PliU1 S,1cl.1¥>i 1""flXl "'<I 1,1\:'\l>SC AP E 1.1 J.lll\W cop•M.l •lcrl'J.n 1.1 81Jd<1Wh11,J.""'11 ,·•p</,,b,tcrPIJ11 l.l linW&crncnl1 1,4 T)·p1,,.!Pl,nllfl8 L5 Will,llhlf,ncePL,n CO:SCa>T UAI.C.RA.0 1:>'C: CG-l T,llc Sbc ct CG-l Con<cplll>l Ondu,g P~ ("'<111idc) CG-2r..CO-J Cu n.cp1 wl O r ........ Pl.an (cMt mlc) CU-I TnlcShccL CU-ltoClJ .J.t.:on.:<ptualU11htyPl:111("·u111dc) cu.21ocu.J t.:on.:rp1 ... 11J11htyPJan(co111idc) CIVlLSIT►:PLAN STR.L P,opo,.JS1LcP!an STl'.-2Hxi,11"11PrDJC<1S11<rho tos Buildinz Tvoes and Heiuhts Aoolicable Buildin« Codes Du,l.!ir;oi ll Rw lJ,ng ll Ru,1Jmg ll 8u,JJ,ng l4 Bw!J.ng JS Bu1t<Wl&l6 Buil.ul1jl l7 ewlwt\jl JM &<,~,,.Jl.itl 11., 1r.1· Sll\&l<Widlh (l.>r.igc l>wJ W ,<lh O ar_,.< 15.oilr.l' 11'-'.llr.1' Building Addresses Bwkhn& 11 Un°.·\n,1rw:J"" R.,n,:hu C•hf.,,ru., Ru.lll BwlJ,ng 11 Un-A.s a,1f1C Jonlun.:hoC1hforr113 ltoaJ Bw!du,g 11 Un,Au,p Jonlun..•hoCaJ1fo1ru:,Rn..J ewlJing 14 Un-An'inc~onlun.:hoCaJ,fo,,...Rnad Bw khng J) Un·AH""'donlLu,,,hoC•hfor....,Road Bw ~ 16 Un-Am 11nc J,,.,R..u,,,hu C ..J,f.x nu Ru.od Bw ld.i rc 17 Un~.\J,,gnc dor,ltan.:hoCal,fomuRo>d Rwlding 11 Un-.AJ 111f1CdMltan.:hoCal1forr113 Rn>J Bwlchni!Co.lt M,;ch,w e•lc.oJc li!«ll>::•ll"odc Plum bin;I ::::'D C.:AL O RE EN Muni.,pdt.:ode 2019Caltfor1U1 Bwkl!na l"odc 20 lYC•!tfor""'M «lwu ••JCo,,k l<i lYC•hforn,alilntm •lt;o,,l c ll,IYCohf<>rn,aPlum bUlj!Co dt lUIYC~hf<>1111Jli11<rg Codt 2Gl9D hf.,,ru,fo cC..Jc 201\ISw,,,l,u ds CllyofT •m"''1l •M UN cip,,IC.:odc Solar Panels Thc Pr oJ<c!w 1ll1nr:lud cSol11 l'mc l1rn ou,,1<J1111 Lhc Moo f1orlhc Ap .,lm cnlfl111 l.lu\j 1 EV CS Conduits h ""o.k I" ...,,,Ju,1 for•ll fll1,.c ""'""'acJ likclr1c \'ch.I de ciw.mc SW IIIIII (F.VCS J :1.11lxm 11onlh, s,1, Plan Alo.ll1ar111co. prO'{iJc acor,J w!ur condlll !1 fo, Mwr li\'CS lor~Jloa..'Corn mo.b l< Lo:W R o!an,:11111 li\'C.:S licr,n prn,nl Site M aterial Soecifications Thi ,pr oJCCllN ll<OIIWn D,h,JLi cbll..od:•11 0101.tw .n, MctalFe111:ing Ro:ulJWIII W•!I• l'l!hll o., .... nu .. 11 l,,Lulbu~« l'A\"cmcnl Pt.ygr uund f.<jwpmcnl Wind>w fo,mn SccSh<c1SJ.0J IY•ynrDa\l,;nCuluru.ilSrnu>·••!uryC:ulu,'llruwn IY•~::~::;Lul/PacV(lc R..,,m •!l:U! \'u1ble frum the A1ph.r h-Dct o1•li,·cl'anngllll<a dy ln1L1 ll<d111 Ph.r scl N11N",wPl•1111<lllrkl l!~"1pmcnl ).~~;:i~:~:r, Srnu W h'1c wilh Jntcrn..J 011.ll IU Pua:JDe .cri pdon : Parcel11,S,6,7.8,IO.ll,anJllofPor.clM,pl10B, Mop llook 116, P•1e180& ~I 1nlhcC11yofTem,...,1., U>un 1yofR1v,11,d<. Sl•I• o!C.:ahfoiru~ AP No: 94 4-J70 ~1,944.)}0.00 ~.~44-l7o.G06 ,94U 70 .00 7, 94 4-)7U .{0,1, 944.Hl•-ll m. 94◄.~70.0 12, ~44.)7U-f,m ProjulAddn lKO: l((6J, l007S, J0017. )(IN-I, )0111, lOIH. 111147. K,U'i. lC,11 Sand lOICt71tan.:ho CaJ,fornu Rm,d, Tcl!!w ,J._t.:A !nS?I Zoning: PWVl ,JlJC\·clup~,,:n10,crt.iytl'!XJ)5 G,n.,all'lanl>ulan•Uon: l,,lciliu,n Dcruity Rc11,kntid (M) lcd•ll .. 1.-nd lJH: 'Upp,:1° l'uft1,rn,>f P.u«l w Mulltf>m~yllu11<1f11 II\ Corulr1"11on 'I.D"·e1"l'urhOnofPar.cl•\·a:an\/G11di:J PNlpoH dl.an dUH: ).[uJt,.fom,lyltrndcnt,>l l"ropoH dl>tn1by: ·Uppcr·PD111on•l60U111ll(,ncon,lr""honJ 'Lowu•P0<110n•LJ◄l'Nlo(tiu,p1op<,1•lJ To talProp<,•J •!94lJn,l, lY4 Un1hlll ll ,\uu • 11 U ll1•·•ll"'I! Urulo P« ,\uc o .. ..,n, RcnJc-l'·...,,Mulll•f,ur11ly,ll' lllllforJ,,n,\,·,nw:,•ll7 ~l~i~~ CA 91}!,} Conla.:I Uorlonlluc:h>ltcr Pro iect Consultan ts Aldi,lc.l John\\'3\,onluch.ltcels,Jn.: 72 6Ch,:lh.,.m \\'ay Sanlall11boro.CA 9110 8 (10j)969-7110 L"""11 .aptAl,h1lW D••1dNcauh,\Jo1or; .. 1u 4JM77 1i1'1 1,rp,1>ct.:11~lcN<>1thSw1c•l4(1 Tcmc.-ul a,CaJ,for1U1 9lS 'lO (9SIJl96 •l4lO Stn>:ll>'oll','lillnt<I l-cv 111 \'ondc l\'ortSH L•7Coh!ban ll Ook l.l,t!A Y,111 (l~S)S6 H 46 l M«h.rfll c•LIP!wnb1111l'.ngimcr 1'.'PM«lwuc al 1717Wc,1!1:u11hcmA,·e SwtoJJ(t Ph.'<rux.AZ 15021 Mc,h.r ni;;,lSy,tcm, Scm,nJi>P<1«PH Plum b"'I Sy,tcm, G111 Kuut1J t6!,l)l4~-'i)ll f.t.,11 .. >1Er11&111<<1 1"M M•IU11<y.Pli JS6WcotAl..,,.1rAv<nuc,S11:1<A Sa11 1.1R;11bira,CA9ll0j tlllS)S69-921G Cml&,.,nccr ltcrw:\'1111Pli ORC.:llnr;inc crlllj! J6'J SOlJSpr.,_,RJ•ll0 An.o hcim,CA\12JUW (71~)6rS-'iW6U s.,~, ling,nce1 EHll!"11111,rins Jl46 T,gcr Run CuurtSwtr\18 C.u lsb•J.C,\~lU ll' 760 -411-3747 lin<111)'t.:o!,-ul il10<'II D:1•1dh,gcr.Phl> 6:ZO l."hc th.l,r,W •~ Sat1 t.oOor1Mr ,1.CA 911(1 (lt6)969-lU1 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chclham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-7280 COVERSHEE AO.I Phase I AND Phase 2 Proiect Area Statistics Unner and Lower Site Proiect Statistics Unit Distribution & Sizes and Parking Demand fahibi1GI Rc aJc,H .>11 1A .,•ru ~ca n P ~,c 1 •,.J l ''""' ....... ~ ...... ~N" ...,>,1,W•>" '-"••II c ... ,..., ;;,,,_,., """"'" c.n.• ·~· ""' .... "''"' ........ ,. ~~- ...... ,If ~.- ......... o .., ... , ,i """''"' ''"~ ,,..,, ........ 11JJ "" '°~"· , .... ,...,., ..... 1 ..... ,- l)S,UI -..,, ...... ,w.. ...... .,. AP So:<;44.)71>.00 \,9'4.)71l.OC S,944-J71).0(l6.94<4-l70-00 7,94"4-l71J.«l ll,944-l10-0 10,S44-l70-0 12. 90 .)7(1.(J \).t.)b<m ,1gcJ1r11tt on<p>r •<l;u p;,n oflhat "1'Phu1m n S1:tHIAddN,MI! Unkn.,">1"1IN1tlf\1c l,,:,gol D u ai ptii,n : P,rcc!< l,S,6, 7,1, 10, 12.,nJ ll <>fP..,,cl ),,(,pJHl 2l ,MJpB oo k216,P •i"IO J.:l l 111 1hc C uy <>f T,mc•u!a,C.,wity<>fRffc11icL:,S1,1c<>fCahfomi• Zonlna: PWVl<JlJ,v<lopm c1110v <rby(PIXMJ G 1nc n,ll'll n D n l&n1\lon : McJ.L\Jl\1D,:n,1tyRn"lcnl1Jl(M1 £1i1llna/f'n,poN dl.a ndUH : 'Upp.-r'Po,t..,,,ofJ>.or «I MW!of•11nlyllo,.1nt1 (inCon,tn.a<twn) ·Lo,.·,,·Pumonofl'.u«l !i.<1 1111111-\" ... •n\/..:iuo.ltJ,,l'Jopo,.d•Mi.,J\tf,nnlyllo .. "" l"a ru ]Sl.r c: Toti lO ,ou Ar ca 1,000.)97,f 2l 97A.1:1<1 Tala l /1,'<I A rn 9•:U .(19 1 • f n ,2 A m i llpp<r ll:<!Al t1 •6 62,llU •f IS 22 A cro La11·u 1''<IAl n •ll l,IOl1f 760 .\m Tat•I Bul ldi"I Aro a: (Sn Shut AO.? fo , O c!.,l!J U ppcrS ,lc{lnC aMIN<llan) 266,jn ,r Lo,.·crS>l<:lT!utl'roput..t) H l,9l91f ful tucS 1!c ~9S.~1l 1f t,,,t C o,,.rq 1; !l.!!!.!!!!!!&! U pp<r S 1lc(lnC on11 rw !rn n) 1n .212 1r ll7 ,lll/66 1,91l•11~'. Lo11·uS,1<:(Thn l'lopoul1 101.1 411 r 101.1 ~1/H l.]0l•]I'/, En1'f<S11<: lH ,4!>11 ( ll~.4S'.Vl9 ~.09 1·U ,i Uni:unrcJ P.&1h1J1 ..,.J DnHW:')"1 U ppc 1S 1!canil E nt,y l)1i>·•"·•y\l nC on ,1N<llo n) 116,61] 1 f J J6,61l l66 2.9ll • 11\~ La"·•• S11< (Tha l~apa1.1l1 111,690 ,f 11,690/lll,I0I ·25'1, EnhrcS,1.cl':u klflil onJ llm<11·•y• J'.11.~n ,r l~U 7HIJll 4,U9 l•ll"I, L1UIWtap111MWOpcnSp ... cC o•c1"'c U pp,,1S 11c 1lnC on rt,u;;:llon) (661 .9U -lll.l l?-Jl6.61J )166 l.91J •62,; LowcrS,tc(Th11l'lop,,1.1l/ Entu~li,:~101- 101,111 1 • U ,16S) I 33 1.1 01 • ◄]~\ Pa rlun ~99 ~.90 1-ll l,451-202,141 )199 4.90 1 •56% \Jn,1T yp, •ofl/11111 ke~ui r«l !t<qu ir<d k,~uir •d 1'10.i .J.:d Pro vi<lc J l~o,idc d Cov<r<d UnCov<rcd Gunl co .. rcd u..a.i vcr<d ci.---nr-.., "'II cq\Ul c ""1ilf 01.o ll'AI "'II pat<,l'f OVI ""~ ~•U (CaY<r <J.IJ nCa vm JinJ ,l1,1U IJ (Ca v<r cJ.U 11<ove1cJ,arul !J 11,U1 ) llln lii 1arA ;.:,:.,,bJe p3ou !'J a,ul<J 11<h . .J,Jin obl ,Allo ve)· , um ,rof!-W or,~-~ .,~'"II p>«sJ>r .,..id..d • n oor Ar .. Ro tlo U pp<rS 11<-(l nC on 11N;llDn) ?66 .1n l66 U 11•4CH, L0.,·crS,1c{Thll l'10po1.1J1 22 1,9)91))1,)01•69¾ 495.~121\19 4,ll<i l•W /, O«upancy Clu oln u Uon/C ora lru tUon T)p {Thi 11'1upo .. !) Stru<Uu< Oc cC L,u ,f,-.~tiun Con oU1.l(;\1unT 1pc Sp,itJdc t"1ALi,-m ll:llffl b1rS1onn l!<111h1 Ap>rtm ,nt1 k•l T)'p,:S A Vu l lll'-11· D ana " U T)'p,:Sfl Sa C.U po,:i. T)'p,:SR 11'-ti · E,a;rciscRoo,n T)'Jl<SA hJ\lbltG.l R-,...,•,ya,tn -1PM M i Un/I b N Pl tl!'RY!!9o -:r;..:ae l>,;nwd CJ\all f!l"'l , :· ~ -~ .. .: u -·-~•· ... ·-· > "' ., ., ·- ""~ ,,.,. ··~ ,..., ,,,.. ,.,. ""' , ,~,,. ,,, .. John Watson A rchitects, Inc. 726 Chclham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-72 80 Unit Distribution & Sizes and Parking Demand r--Ao..i, .. .:: .. ~.:~~~;;i;- ..... -J 1.... _ .. _ -•--! I i 1---"-'"=~·~- ----- !"'"""·"""· ·-')6-J•~ L--~;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;:::;;;;;::;;;;:~~---=11 >-f- --+--+ -_ -_ -_ -_-_ - _ _,~ PROJECT STATISTICS A0.2 C l J I I 11 I 1"=40' \ t \&) A-1.1 j J l u LJ EB Lower Site Plan 1"-30' A-1.2 a l Q J D EB Overall Site Plan IN=.JO' Al.l \· EB Lower Site Plan 1"~30' LOWER SITE PLAN Al.2 I' _j Unit IA Area= 651 1/4"= 1'-0" Unit ID Area= 726 1/4"= 1'·0" 1/4"= 1'-0" II J-1/2">.2-1/2"20G1ugcMt1>! S!udt @l~"OC l!JI.O !l.'O COLOR• Non-R11,"ll1 RNDV2 Wall Types A rca = 1163 t-'!f I,, ,, ---r --"-'.Y,· 1/4" = 1'-0" JO' Unit2B A rca = 1202 1/4" = l'-0" II ~ot1i11/ltl!hLh4V.'1\I F.n1h &1 1l on_<>m n fD m p C eiHns On\yA1Un11lA II 1•4 1',(1!1 . A ll f loo 11 en (&16"0CUN O ~ II 2•6 Ru r\\'i,1!A tl1undri c,. ~lWTJbing \\'i\!l, Olhct MiK "'O W •llsr'!l 16"0 C U :>;0 ! ~ 1 2 •10 W all @ l6"0 C Ul\0 ~ 2.11W1ll(3 16"0CU1'.0 5' 20' John Watson A rch itec ts , Inc . 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (8 0 5)-9 6 9 -72 8 0 @ , ' ' . Copyright I D,"tinJoi1llhy ' UNIT PLANS A-2.1 I @ I BcdRm#l [J ® 0 ® Dining 2 C ~ ~Low ~RNVD1 New Unit2C Ar~57 1/4" = l'-0" RN DV2 Wall Types II Pani1111oi,-hlh4Wall End,111lolk\mofDmpCoil;ng OnlyA1tJni1lA I Ouc1inJoi111lay ' II ,_~4\\'all. AIIFloon v, 6i;l6"0C lr..;O ~ ;J: John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 9 J I 0 8 (805)-969-7280 1 ~ - I/ 1'e--- t ~11 f I '1 .. 'a§ "' ~ 0 " 1 'O I ,.E "' I c 0 «: @) ~ ·a -~ " e E E c.. i£ 17-0)1· ,,..,½· 0 ~;.:::: u >. ell "'u U nit3 A E] _g ~ A re a = 134 1 ~ ' u V, 1/4" = 1'-0" ~~~ _,.._,¼• ~~®c'.J -as-~ cd ;:, is [/} '3 ; ] i ~ < ~ .3 ~ PA 20-1325 Kitchen ~ @ tt-¥ . ITO t Copyright ,~, 2~ 20ll I Living I MBR ¾ © 1~ f:$ UN IT PLANS U nit3 B A rca = 14 31 1/4" ~ 1'-0" 10' A-2.1 5' 0' John W atson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969- 72 80 Building G Middle Floor Plan 118"= l'-0" EB Building G Lower Floor Plan 118" = 1'-0" BUILDINGG FLOOR PLAN A3-Gl BuildingG Roof Plan 1/8"- l'-0" .,,.I,◄•~•~<""-'•~.!,,, ,~.,,...,.,., r<< 11(-'-!I'•~•--' "'' ,,.....,.,.,1-..r,_, ""_,,.,.. ~ ..... ..,,, ..... ,,_ .. , ... ..,., ,..., .. ,;..,....i .. ,, .... ,~ .. l'r .. < f_....,.,,_,..... r,.,,.,,,,.~.,..,. ...... ,p..,....,...,,, .... ..i.. ......... -.. .... ~ • l>.-••~"-""'""'" .. ,v, .... ,..,.. • ...,. John Watson Architects, Inc. 72 6 Chelham W ay Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 BUILDINGG FLOOR PLAN Building G Upper Floor Plan 1/8"= l'-0" A3-G2 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93108 (805)-969-7280 BuildingG End Elevation 3/16"-1'-0" mi,,,.,,., ..... ..., o., .... ,,,-.i.'"'"''""- ·'°"""'""'"'wt:=-.:';;':. BuildingG Side Elevation 3/16" - 1'-0" BUILDI NG G ELEVATIONS A3-G4 P atio A rea 52 4 + 499 1023 Building H M iddle Floor Plan 1/8" - l'-0" ,_ ,...-4/S·------------- Building H Low er Floor Plan 1/8"- l'-0" John W atson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 ® - . Copyright BUILDIN G H A3-Hl John W atson Architects, Inc. 72 6 Chelham W ay Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Building H North Elevation 3/16""" l'-0" ______ , Building H West Elevation 3/16"- 1'-0" BUILDINGH ELEVATIONS A3-H4.1 John W atson Architects, Inc. 72 6 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 -;:;::: .. Building H South Elevation 311 6" - 1'--0" rn ' / / Building H East Elevation 3116": l'-0" BUILDIN GH ELEVATIONS A3-H4.2 R!>,:l>VlRwfV,ni, ·-:::--s~~~~~~:z;:~:?z~~ :.·=:"!...~!~::--..:,· .. ·· ..... ,..,,.-.o1 • -~_11q1,t,,,~..,.r,,. .. ,k-o...,._.f Building I Roof Plan 1/8'' = 1'·0" Building I Upper Floor Plan 1/8" = l'.j)" :-·: : : '' ':--; 1 @ Garage Garage Garage Garage Building I Section A 3/16" = 1'·0" 1 i;:::::====::;::JJ John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Building I Section B 3/16" = l'.j)" Building I North Elevation 3/16" • l'-0" Building I West Elevation (East Flipped) 3/16"= l'-0" Building I South Elevation 3/16" = l'-0" Building I Lower Floor Plan 1/8"= l'.j)" @ , . Copyright DAT!i Ju111ry21,1012 BUILDING! A3-Il Building J M iddle Floor Plan 118"- 1'-0" Building J Lower Fl oor Plan 1/8"= 1'-0" John Watson A rchitects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 9 J I O 8 (805)-969-7280 PA20-1325 @ - . Copyright DATE J..,ua JM.20J! BU!LD!NGJ A3-Jl a 3/16"= 1'-0" Building J "Short Side" Elevation 3/16"= 1'-0" Building J "Long Side" Elevation 3/16" = 1'-0" John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 @ . ' . Copyright ,., ..... ,,.,~.ion BUILDI NGJ ELEVATIO NS A3-J4 ---➔--- 4Slopc 4:12 L I I I +------- 1 I .. 1 i] John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 ➔• 30107 ----- * R,,.,f,·cn11ar~c•·cu1 ,1c,l 1tlSq .l't.ur,·•n•wrco pcrljj)><)1'1.of.,,.,f .,,._ Qu:m utrnlmo f,·•n" b.u,Jon·,11u<np1i,,n lh.,,a.:1,,.,11 l,u l"l'"'""'"'"iuubk,·tnlOI<>. lioc1u.J,·cn1>1c,i,MTocn1 ,· m1hn•nu11,~,-,n, vro,ic' ,.· ,h,<orrt<lf ~n· n'-'ld d1m 1bulio n.,,!w wnon1lu,J,,,..,o~, A 0«1olc1 a I Sq .Fl Ntt Aro RoofVrn t on Slo~iJ,g Roo f A3-K1 0 r--------- : - ~ - - - - - _-_....,_ ~-~uol B ~-r-------~-~ I ;----_-_-_-_-_-_-_.,,, athroomsEastEI . c_, I ~.---.c:::=::::!i.L _ 114 .. = l'-O" cvat1un ,_; _) I ;-------"'. !---r-==-- I PoolBath~·omsWc'.sth1 ~-r L __ 114., = l '-O" cvalmn ~-r----_- "' Pool Bathrooms Shower A;C: 114" • 1'-0" ~_r------------_-_-_-_-_-_.,, ~ ,, ~---;~.:c:•::•"·'" :\ LruJ,.l&_d ~ □ Pool Ba!hrooms Roof Pl 1/4"=1'-0" ans 0000 □ 0000 □ SceSh«tA04forRe . P~!B · qu,ndMiruiom John Watson Architects Inc 726 Chelha~ wa; Santa Barba CA 9 3 I /: (805)-969-7280 ,I oolBi1hWomc n nimum and MuimWII Di,ncn1lon1 Garage 29 5 Car ~~~=~~- W / I IC 6 Space Carpori ~111:i:.:~~ ,, ,. --jb., R·;,.=t:4•;" R•,.,. ~r ,, 4 Car Garage Foundation O}d,..,;.,...,,....,:., Garage32 4 C~~. ~.!~age e>1--r~1i··1·1:J 1 1 : ···················-· G:arage 33,411 42 7 C~~- ~.~~abrc GaraK,c 30 7 Car Garage With HC Parking f "··-="··--"•--•---=~:,<-="··-="'·-="•·-- .... 4 ·.. r •• :::..:,.~ ... , I ··.... .. .. ..-·· i ..... ..-· .. . . ··· u -- Gar2ge 36 1 37 l ~i!f.,~ 9 c~,~. ~-~~ge , n•· 1 , ' ·.. ....... : ; 1::;: <,: H 1·, .. ~1.·; _.o-s/ I ···· _ -------•········ __ .. . . Gangc31,34 8 Car "Double Deep" Garage 1=-= .. ··=--=•··=-===•··====·~,,-·======•«·= .. = ="·"-::::jj 1······ . 1······ . 1 ....... .................... S..,,iaSl,b ... f .......... ,.. !· : :r..~::c:; ::·" ......... ·~ ...... I 11 ' / ~ ···:.... j !l ······ ..... u J.,,/,u,.,,,.hl.o,t<tl\..l•••lm.,.,.,p,,!!lo>•"'••f...,, , ~-•1-·,.,,.b•-..f•• .. •...,,""'""·'""'"" , •• '-·. ,.·.,."''· _., .. """"'""''~ .... ''¼ • ;:.,::. .. ,,._ ••• ~::·._<k .p,op,.""'""'' t"··.... . ....... ""7 Garage 44 4 Car Garage \~'ith Trash Enclosure •··•·· ..•.... .. / ····· .. 111 ..----t------t---t-----------!P _ rn 1 C; Lt=: ==b:::Jt'dt~~~~~ . ·--•Yi· Gar2gc43 ~ Garagc35 S Car Garage !-IC Spai.:c, ·1,:::i!~;~nclosure and ~Jail Room d==r====7 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Gara e Plans Garage 28 22 Car "Double Deep" Garage A3-M1 @1\pical 2 Car Deep Garage Section . - 1,,-., ... ,. @ I Car Dc:c~ Garage@ ( IC @Trp I Car Deep Garage Section . . ,, ... ,.,,- ( . -~---) a. Jn□□nl 4 Car Garage Rear Elevation ~i";:i:;1-'> Tvpical 1 Car Deep Side Elevation ~ 4 Car Garage Front Elevation o.;~~~ttp ~ .... ---- r :, 1 Car Deep Garage With Tr:ish Enclosure Attached Rear Rlevadon Typical 1 Car Deep Garage \\'ith Trash Enclosure Attached front Elc\•ation 1 Car Deep Garage \'(1it~ 1 ~:~.ParkingFront Elcntion John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 fin□oo□□D□QO l 8CarG2ragc Front and Rear Elevation 2 Car Deep Garage Side Elevation ~ boo□□ 22C:arGaragc Front and Rear Elcv,uion J Jml . ' . 0 - c.21 ° Garage WI Trash Enclosure, Accessible Stall, Mailroom, and Po~!-~?!ip North Elevation Garage W/ Trash Enclosure, Accessible Stall, Mailroom, and P~!-~~~ip South Elcvalion ,/'""'·~· D Ir .... ~. II .. u ... ,, ... , ,.,., .. , .. 6 Car Carport Rear Elevation ~ 6 Car Carport Side Elevation ~ 6 Car Carport Front Elcv:ition Garage W/ Trash EnClosure, Accessible Stall, Garage W/ Trash Enclosure, Accessible Stall, t-------< Mailroom, Pool 1~~.~.t Wcsl Elevation Mailroom, and Po~~.~-iuip East Elevation Free Standing Trash Enclosure Elevation Garage Plan and Elevations A3-M2 M :.:- -.. ,.._ - - - - - - - - - - - - -- ----------- \_1.,.,,0..,u,.,, Gate Detail 3 .. = l'-0 .. Garaze Notes r.,/TF.RIOkFINISIIES: AU Garage Walls and Ceiling, Shall Be flry Willed, Taptd, Te•iured, And foggW With Sil\~ TYJle X Drywall. Cei1ing1 Shall 111\·c (lJ h)·ers of SIR~ TypcXDryw,11 DRAFT STOPS: Pro1·ide Dr11\Stop1"·i1hthc•1tic1p,eea.,c1Utdouton1hilJ'llan. SccDctnil 7/A4,R ATTIC ACCESSES: Provide AUic Aceu1cs 1111hown on this plan. Nol(": Multiple "'con in each gara,eatcll(cdedbct1u1cot'DnflS1op1. ,\II ,\ui, Ac~ .. ,,....,, Sh.JI tk I lluuf R•ml. Ulc)'.Ot<·• p•nvfa L 111,ur roof ,c,lmg11JCmbl1·, Roof Vents Roul1·cnu •1c okul•trtl 01 I Sq.Fl. of vcm ~rt"• per ISO Sq.l't. ol wof are•. (J111n111rnfmnf,·cni,bucdona,1ump11on1h•1c•(h,·cn1 h"'l"'luucfoo1ofu,.blc,•cn1•«1. lfact\lalv,nta,c•i•diffc"nt f1un1tl1i1.111unip11un, pro,·:.d.:1·cm,in thccuucc,prupuniun,nd ,hmib.,tionuihownonthi1<.lr~"fog. E,d, "S..pn.ic Spac••" (,· I( ., •• ., in the •tile llut •t~ n,·•t<:d d,h,·r br "nr,,.ft S1np1" or Iii· ",\plnmtnl Unit Pcnmcicr W~h• cucmhng ,n 1l1t wultr<i<.lt of ll,.. n,uf ,hulll.U11t,, must bt 1·,nul,tnl upar,u~· at thcr,1c1hu""n•bow. A Dcno1csa 1 S11,Ft.NctA~11RoofVen1onSlopin11Roof _ I 1······, ..... .,_, ... ~,.t~ II Color Soecification := r"""'"""'~ John W atson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 9 3 IO 8 (805)-969-72 80 Copyright J I I I. I 1' ·' ~ I ' I ,I / I 1· ' TRASH ' ENCLOSURE lo l / GATE/ 1° I ' . ' SCHEDULE LJ . / ,, ...... ' A3-M4 C o lo r 1 : O m e g a #2 0 (S im ila r to D E 6 1 5 5 S o ft Iv o ry ) C o lo r 2 : O m e g a #2 -1/2 A 9 4 8 (S im ila r to D E 6 3 1 2 D u s ty D r e a m ) C o lo r 3 : O m e g a #4 1 3 (S im ila r to D E T 6 5 4 C r e m e F ra is c h e ) C o lo r 4 : O m e g a #A 5 6 0 (S im ila r to D E T 6 0 5 D r iftin g D o w n s tr e a m ) C o lo r 5 : O m e g a #4 1 4 (S im ila r to D E 6 3 8 0 C lo u d e d V is io n ) C olor 6: O m ega #1/2 A 865 (Sim ilar to D E T 665 G ra in M ill ) R oof T ile: T esoro B lend B arcelona 900 B ora ! R oofi ng John Watson Architects, Inc. 72 6 Chelham W ay Santa Barbara CA 93108 (805)-969-7280 C olor 7: O m ega #4 18 (S im ilar to D E 6200 H andw oven) Color 8: Omega #18 (Similar to DEW325 Vanilla Shake) Color 10: DEA158 Northern Territory) "McNichols Grecian 17840032 Used at Gas Meter Doors ' Colosseum Travertine "Roman" White Vinyl Window Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" I Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" French Limestone "French White" ~ Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Blend" Exhibit F @ - . Copyright ll \'fl ( So,·anbtr6 2020 f~lmia 1.1\121 M A T ERIA LS A6.l Building #12 (Type G ) End Elevation Color Schem e 2 3/16" ~ 1'-0" John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Building #12 (Type G) Side Elevation Color Scheme 2 3/16"~ l'-0" Rendezvous Phase II Color Schemes and Materials Color I Omega #20 2 Omega 112-1/2 A 948 3 Omega #413 4 Omega #A 560 5 Omcga/1414 6 OmegaMl/2A865 7 Omega#418 8 Omcga#l8 9 Bora\ Tesoro Blend IO DEISS Northern Territory 11 French Limestone "Ryland Bufr' Wall Tile I 12 Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" Wall Tile 2 13 Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunrivcr Bind" Base Tile Alt Scheme#! Dody Color I Body Color 2 Trim RoofTilc Scheme #2 Body Color I Body Color 2 Trim RoofTilc Wall Tile I Wa11Tilc2 WallTilcJ Base Tile Base Tile Alt Scheme#] Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Schcmc/#7 Scheme #8 Integral Plaster Color Similar To: Description Body Color 2 Body Cir Body Cir DE6155 Son lvory Light Cream Body Color 3 DE63 l 2 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grey/Green Body Color2 DET654 Creme Fraiche Light/Medium Cream Body Color 3 DET605 Drifting Downstream Dark "Dull" Green Body Color I Body Cir DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray Body Color 1 DET665 Grain Mill Medium Cream/Orange Body Cir DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brown Trim Trim EntryTrm Trim Trim Trim DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whitish Rool'Tile Rool'Tile Roof Tile RoofTile Roof Tile Roof Tile ll-317- R Roof Bundle Taupe - Apprx Same Color All Doors All Doors All Doors DEA 158 Northern Territory Dark Brown - Semi-Gloss Wa\1 Tile I Wall Tile I Wall Tile I WallTilc2 Wa11Tilc2 Wal\Tilc3 WallTilcJ Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Note: Color Scheme #I not used on Phase II. COLOR SCHEME BUILDINGG SCHEME2 A6.2 Exhibit E-1 B u ild in g s #13 an d #15 (T y p e J) E n d E lev atio n C o lo r S ch em e 3 B u ild in g s #13 an d #15 (T y p e J) L o n g S id e E lev atio n C o lo r S ch em e 3 3132"= 1'-0" ~·~·· Buildings #13 and #15 (Type J) Short Side Elevation Color Scheme 3 3/32"= l'-0" Exhibit E-2 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 @. . . . ~ Copyright COLOR SCHEME BUILDINGJ SCHEME3 A6-3 Buildings #14 and 1117 (Type J) End Elevation Color Schem e 4 3/32"= 1'-0" a a John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93108 (805)-969-7280 Buildings #14 and #17 (Type J) Long Side Elevation Color Schem e 4 3/32" = 1'-0" /'""""' COLOR SCHEM E BUILDI NGJ SCHEM E4 Buildings #14 and #17 (Type J) Short Side Elevation Color Schem e 4 3/32"= l'-0" A6-4 Exhibit E-3 J o h ~ W a t s o n A r c h i t e c ts , In c . 72 6 C h e lh a m W ~anta Barba:: A 9 3 I 0 8 (805)-969-72 80 Building #l l (T E ype H) nd Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32"= 1'-0" ______ , Buildings #I I (T Long Side Elev~ii~:) Color Scheme 4 3/32"= 1'-0" C Typical Garage ~~t.~_Trash Enclosure f Typical Garage ~~t 1 ~_Trash Enclosure C Typical Garage ~~t.~_Trash Enclosure Garaec Color Scheme Assia nmcnts """"'" \J~lfD[/1...,...mJ 11...i,.,ionr.5,,•1,o')J Bldg #16/Garage 38 Driveway Side Elevation 1/8" = l'-0" Bldg #16/Garage 38 End Elevation 1/8"• l'-O" 7 i J O-p<1' ~.,11.,..- .... , 1"°"la,IODES.~h.,,J Bldg #16/Garage 38 Hill Side Elevation l/8"= 1'-0" Typical Gara ge With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Exercise Room South Elevation 178"- i'-0' Ot rmtlt Exercise Room Exercise Room East Elevation North and West Elevation 178'= l'-0' 118"-1'-0" Color Scheme 115 BathroOITl Shower EiCvation Elcvalliin Along Enif)' Walk 1/8" - 1'-0 1/8" • 1'-0 ,,. ... , loofT,I, John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Copyright Garage #35 with Mail Room South Elevation 1/8"= l'-0" Garage #35 with Mail Room West Elevation l/8"= l'-0" ~ ..LL.m.il. Garage #35 with Mail room East Elevation 1/8" = l'-0" Exhibit E-5 COLOR SCHEME SMALLER BUILDINGS A6.l Barchessa Loredan Attributed co Andrea Palladio Facade: Composed of a 2 Story Arched Loggia \Vith Pilasters Resting on Raised Bases. Facade Complctc:d Using Unadorned Window Treatments "Ihroughcuc "ll,cl,uildiugcrn1simnfninc,rd1<..;wi1lik91ioncmlu1c,ndfrm10.-d l,~·pili,i,:r,nfllnricordn "'·'"PP"lf 111 rnuhlm ,l\·mold,-d. wl1id, c..\tu1du1u1hc:cnmc!:'°""'lnoor,11unn1i:wnh,,ini:k,p.,n Ahmc: 1hcpu1d111>c11licfi,nlluo,.w,.,.l.1Jr,c~l1".""lu,h.uc,tdl1""5,:1n,,\ a/I 1l1c 11.-ating •~~1,-nn fnr the rnritq: of ,ill,;wnrm~ • (~•!11c,i1c.,rliom\~1,k,pc,l1,: Building Type 3A Patterned After the More Ornate Barchcssa Lorcdan (See Left), This Facade is Composed of a 2 Story Loggia (Used I Jere for Private Open Space) W'irh the Supporting Columns Resting on Tiled Bases. lhe Building's Facade is Completed With Unadorned Windows. While Barchessa loredan Uses a Simple Single Span Hip Roof, a More Articulated Hip is Provided Here to Lower the Overall Height of the Building and to Create Greater Visual Interest for the Residents and Neighbors Alik e. John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 93 10 8 (805)-969-72 80 Two Story Colonnade Th ese Three Im ages Each Use a One Story Arcade/Loggia to Bring Variety, Texture, and Shadow to the Lower Floor of a Two Story Building. While T11e Two Story Building Proposed for This Project Patterned Alier the Barchessa Lorcdan, 'these Images Arc: Provided to Illustrate How Different Column Types, Spacing. and F..vcu DiflCrent Opening "Type" (Square and Arched) Can Be Used And Still Retain the Beauty, Grace, and Elegance of The Original Prototype. Enrablarure Entablature's Exist at the Intersection of Wall And Roof In Some Classical Buildings. Th e Degree of Derail of the Encablature Varies From Architectural Period To Architectural Period, But Is Always Used To Provide A Sophiscicated Wall To RoofTransition. On "lhe Proposed Building, 'lhe Entablature Adds Elegance and I kips Th e Transition From Th e Slightly Higher End Pieces To The Lower Center Span. ...._.., ,..., ! CORNICE FRIEZE !ARCHITRAVE r-'------r--"" Building Type I Building Type I is a Minuet of rhe other Buildings on the Site. Chiselled Limestone The Photograph to the Right Shows Chiselled Limestone Tile Surrounding an Arched Openings, A Decorative Molding Separating the Chiselled Limestone From the Cement Plaster {Stucco} Arch. 'Jhc Chiselled Limestone Docs Not Extend to the Ground, It Rests on a Decorative Molding Which Defines the Boundary for the Un-Chiselled Limestone Base Below. STYLR SHEET A-7 ~---+--- Top of Upper Retaining Wall. Top of Lower Retaining Wall. P'------+-T.W.1109.0 ___ .__T.W. 1104.6 ______ F.G. 1099.0 Planting: Foundation of both walls will be planted with medium to high shrubs and ground covers. Wall surfaces will be planted with vines Cascading vines will be planted at the top of both walls. Phase I • Pilaster and fence treatment Geogrid - Anchor Retaining Wall Color to match phase 1 Rendezvous "Tuscany" RETAINING WALL ELEVATION FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI-FAMILY LP APN #'S Development Plan# PA3 20-1325 944-370-001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 .. , .. 32· CITY OF TEMECULA IOCUOII fOl!NIGlffllY DAT(lY UDYUCCA LA\AllDUtAr.l•MeY.!DI' G<Q\KT PUR'1.tlH'k'10hl lmMAIM,lS "!USC AN &lUE" LHIGlll 10SlMlil1 VICINITY MAP EY ..•• THOM IIROS.1006- PAGF 95'1 SF.ClK)N F-6 N.l.S. LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: DIRECTORY: OWNER J APPLICANT: TEMECULA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, l.P. 1210JOIOANA\lf,U7 CAN00APAt~CA9130l &l&-266-7&11 CONIACl:IAIIIIICHAllU ARCHITECT: JOHN WATSON ARCHnECTS. INC. 126CHHltAMWAY ~~r~1,~::iAIA. CA UlOI CONTACT: JOHNWAISON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DAVID NEAULT ASSOCIATES. INC. ,1111 ENTUPIIIE CIIClf NOHH 5Uflf UO TEMECULA. CAllfOt"" 92190 ~~~,!~~~;;~AN LOIIE CIVIL ENGINEER: DRC ENGINEERING, INC. l6050UIHOLD5PRINGIROADIUnE210. ANAHEIM Hllll. CA '280& 171,J68S-U60X337 CONTACT, UN~ 1/AiGA GENERAL CONTRACTOR: PACIFIC WEST DEVELOPMENT. INC. J2&23 TEMECIILA PARKWAY, 11/nE A. IEMECULA,CA925U ('51)20-5230 CONTACT: DAN OOUON RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI-FAMILY LP ,, s::a;l~i~i~1;rn~?J.~2};~~::;~:fN~~~:~~H~~t.1: ~~g~~~fl~ p~~~~~~l(~~:~p~::~:,~N lOW 71 All mlll!IAU ll MINIMIIMUOUlll--SlAl.£11, WfAl"ANIJ/OIUOW-GWWING !Ull!HAll Hmll-llAl.fU. JJ : 1~lt~~N~~~~:lii~pi~~1~1~1:.?:~fg~~ri}!:E::r~:1~~:yg:l~1:ll~1i;~~~~fl·~~1rrgri~.~1 FUT t,/ YIIIICAI mi;;m W!lll no,u GILA!! I 01 (QIJAl IO 2.1 5HAll A\50 IE ffOVOro WIIH ONI )-GA(LONOI lAIGII Ill! Pit l.OOOHlUAtl 1111 01 SlOfl AIIA INAOOUJON TO !l!E AIO\IEUQl!WIM(Nl5 'l AtltAND!CAPIAUAli!IIAllltCIMJ"Dlflll51UIIDDIDtAIKMUICII ~ Alt UllllU !IIAll ll lUIINID Wllll ArrJOPIIAll PIAN! MAlltlAI 41 Alt PAllWAYS. tAtll)!CAPNG. lfNCING ANII OH-!llf llCIUHC 511A\l If MAINTANIU tr !Ill rtOtltll OWNII. I) All IHM.AHD AIIAli It) IIAVf 1,10fillJIIIS£J<ISOl!M1Alll0 10INSIJllf PIAl-11 tMIIUA.l !IJIIIIIYAI. at :11~~.::~~1.~~lg~1u. !HIIJU. ANO GIOUNO COVll !IIAII IE INCOIPOIAIIO INIO \ANO!CAPNC PIAN!. MINIMUM • !~1~~:,~<;:.\~o.:~;AllONIUI ACClf!Alll lOIIIOmt. · !HIUU,I-GA.ll0NlflAN11001NS\lll0ACt•vEIOQfltC!N!COVIIAG(t,/ONll1Alj. YI Dir SYll!MI 5HOlAO It 11\1 DIN All AUA5 IKClPl llJIIJ IIIIGAlJON AND !Will OINAMfNIAl '!ANlJ.C 10, NA1Nl ANO OlO\JCIH IOUIANl flANl$Wlll II INCOktO-AllO WHlUVEkf0!5iltl. Ill lilt APPllCAN!MUfU! UIAI tMHRI P!ANIINGSWlt NOi Nllllltl WIIIIUIMl!U. AOIACINl!!ll. lKIIING 51-UCll/1111 AND 1-.0.IIIC !IG!U llNI!. I?) !\:1~ 1tt!1~t0cN6~~~~~gNw!!i~: 1/111cci,~v°6i'~~~tlA\11 1l~:1\~~(tcil~~~;::1~~r;~o~~~\~:~1i;:!'G, ll) NOOYtllUADf!IICAIIONL'iAllOWIOWIIIIINJ!"OIAIIOtHllMtAME!l/llfACl SITE CALCULATIONS SITE AREA PROPO SED PLA NTING AREA TURF AREA (RECREA TIONAL) EXISTING PLANT ING AREA 8ASINIBIOSWALE AREA TOTAL LAN DSCAPE AR EA l16,553SF{7.3ACRES) 115,182Sf(2.6ACRES) 2,J71SF "' OSF 115,182SF[2.6ACRES) CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND ■ - ACCENT s::~::;,~::~::ll'i AtlCOIANIHOlt\AYllUS - - (AGIISJIIOIIN.NDICA W.CNOltAGIA~flOIA Ol(AEl,'JIOfAfA"flllllllflS" r1UM1Sc.·nu.~11c1ouo ~ CtlAMlWOn.BIJMll'i PIKllND(DACl'lltltA IYAGlllSWW.N/OHIANUM WAIIIINGION\O.IIW!IA CIIO!ISlAl.!llAotlMSJII' PIAl.o.NIJ,A. ~lOODC.000' QlllrCI.IIVllGINIANA !~AC~,C~fOU PO,>~l!~i Clt!AlfAlASUllNl(~fi cu•IAPAIN11lOIA GtlDIIIIAl.111.o.OlMA!IU' "'"-'l!l0A1i!CA rtATANUSACIHOIV. ~ Ct'RISSll'iS£WIIWll'611ilCIA l!A\V.NCY'ltlS Jt,.ifflUSVIIIC~MNA'IOWCUl IOIOCnlJL.t-lfll CAllfi!IMON,n"lllJCIIN" flAIACNll'irt.t!GlNI IIJONYMUSAIJllO.W.ICl>l/ltA CllllllllANOIIII lflllOWll!AtlLflWOllA llUCOftlYLIIIMl."UllNCIOl.O' OUA!.111111 Olli" OWAII oue MYIIUI COMMl#II> 'COWAC!A COWACI MYIUU tll.Ot,!fillUIICCV. tllOIIMU.lllNAX'DAUDlllllff" fltcll.«M llNAX'ltON/( IAU" IHAl'lallff'tl"IMJllllCtlAIJIT M!IAIIAW1U01N )GAIION UIAPIWJLlPl!,UM&EltATA"~Or NOIIIIV.WlHUtN ~GAttON IOSMlilNll'iOIIICJU.lfi IOSlMAIIT MOOCANIAGI 51LIN111Aflfl'IOIMli 011:NAMENTA\ GRASSES CHONOJOP!IAlllMIIC!OIIIM llllCIOIIIICIIUNlfW(IVlfN'i Jt.tlCL.l'ifAIE/6'lltllUE' Ml,.l,KfN&IIIGIACAl'llAIII TREES AND SHRU8S SHAll BE PLACEOA MINII.-IUM OF 5' AWAY FROM WATER METER, OAS METER. OR SEWER LATERALS, A MINIMUM Of 10' AWAY FROM POWER POlES, ANDA MlNH,\UM OF B' AWAY FROM FIRE HYDRANTS AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER ANO STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS, ,.'4.\!llA l!,._Ul!-5,I,!~ t!NNL'iUUM'fATONCAI-IWN" IACCIIAllllf."flGIONrowr CIAMOUMGHO"ON'IA!fi Ol'i11Clll'ilUCCNAIOIIIA MACIAOTINAUNC.IAK:All fAllll(NOCfilUSHICUSrll.O.TA APN #'S Development Plan# PAJ 20·1325 944.310-001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 flOWIUICfltJM !lOWIINGPlAi MlDOlU"-NIANIAN~AlM 4'•6'1.lll 10-lr&l,H, Ol/UNfAlM CAlWOINIAIANrAtM AUSIIAllANY,,UOW UOtllltOCUSI tOIIOOtHIANt 1111 aolllll.if CIIIIAIJ'A kG""ra.,._t IO..OONPIANIIIII OWARISIIAW!IHYlm OltGONGtAPl 0WAIII0!llll~\11!1 IIVIUIUY IAIC(C"-P(lll>ll lllAOAICI.-JI CAlWORNIAGIAYll/511 IIARYAWNMUlllY OHIGIAll f!Al~l~C~AU HDIUl-"IIANGIAll OWAIIC0101llWl.6H CAIM£1Clttrll CAlSClAWVINI IOIJONIYY t&Llfil ~ PLANT FACTOR ~GAllON 5GAIION 5GAIION 51:;AIION 5CA110N ICAUON 5GAllON ,c;AtlON IGA.llON !GAl\ON '" "" 1·0.c. 4'0C. e c c. "' SGA\ION 5GAll0N SGAIION 5GAlt0N 5GA\ION SCA\tt)N 40C. "' 10.C. '10.C. IGAIION«JCO.C. 1CAll0tlj1'0.C IAGll!AllOCdOSl CAJANIASP. GA/ ........ 10.acUAJAPOI..-CA'IV.IIIA~' IOIMAIN.fi 0. PIOSltAIU5 1 CiAllON e ze o.c. IOIA'ILO'MICAlnT 1GAIIONIIJCO.C mw ,ow ,O W ,ow ,ow ~,~ ,ow ,ow mw ~,~ mw row SHEET l OF 5 LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN [J-r1 ~ I CITY OF TEMECULA ~:~ ~ ~ .... z ii' .. P ET W A S T E S TA TI O N B IK E R A C K D R IN K IN G F O U N T A IN / f'ET D R IN K IN G F O U N TA IN G R IL L C O U NT E R / S IN K TO T LO T, SH A D E SA IL, RU B B E R IZE D SU R FA C E POOL / RECREATION AREA ENLARGEMENT 1"=10' SHEET 3 OF 5 ENLARGEMENT LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZV OUS MULTI-FAMILY LP !J-r-7~1 ------------------------------------------------------ CITY OF TEMECULA ~:r.~. APN #'S Development Plan# PA3 20·1325 944-370.001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 A P A R T M E N T B U IL D IN G ,,..,,..\--------- ,,,,. \ ,,:' \ / \ APARTMEN1 aum,o \ ----------------------. APARTMENT BUILDING ------- ---:: / CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND - TYPICAL PLANTING 0 VERTICAL ACCENIS CUHUJll5 UWUVIUNS JJNIIUWY.5lYIOCW FOUNOATION }H~UU ® ® l4GE.SIIOU,l!AN>ICA, MAGNOLIA GU.HDRORA OU0AEUIOrAEA"fRUl'lLUS· rRUNUSC.'fl.il/NOUIC\OVO COAl!I.J\IEOAl CJ,llfOINIArEPPEI UGA\lON N/A CAIOLWA lAUUl CIIEUY U GAtLON NIA OWAUlll,\WIEUYIUE IEl!IEfll"GOlOlNAt\lNOANCE" OUGONGU.PE IUlQ.6JAPO'4C-' C4ltll1EMON"IJTT\EJOIU< llflUOMRE.I AUUTlfOllA LUICOPHYllUMf,'GRffHCLOUO" OLEA E. "UT!LE OLOC Mvtrus COMMUNIS 'CCMPACIA' COMPACT MV"lE PlllOMII flUllCOl-'I J[IUIAL[M !AGE PHOIMIJM !ENAll"DAU DELIGHT IHAPHIO!.Etli'MAJE.ITICIEAUIY IHAIKl()l[tfi UMIEllAIA "MHQII" INOIA IU,WTttORH IOIMAll,ll!SOfAC~>.11 f0RfiOR0UHD SH.U!S / PERENt..lAL\ / OR,t,.$$§ ,-.c;,.,,..,_NTH US AF RIC ANU I ANICOIANIHO!flAYIOl/5 CllllAPUIPUUlJS IUMEROCALlllHYIHI t+UPERALOEPARVflOU. LOW ANO MEDIUM llflClfT GtOUNQCOVERS I.\CCHAJtl r .. ,IGEON ,01Nr OW.\lf COYOTE U\.ISH CEA~TIHISGHOIILIONIAll TURF GRASS· RECREA.noN AREAS ONL'f ~ MARAIHONIOiEQU.\l 4"·•"11.H. 10"•1tl.lH. 24•1ox H"IQX 24•1ox u·1ox 24•1ox 24·1ox 24•1ox 24·1ox 50.\lLON 5GAllON lOHICEllA JMOHICA "HAlU.\N.\" HAll"I HONEYSUCl(E •DIMAll.-,1(.$ 0. ·,11m111A11l$" ,.oUUIE IIOIEM.\.V 101.\ 'ROWOI CAllrEr GlOUHOCOVU ROSE !IN[Cl()MANDIIAIIICAI 111.\C!llC»rlUNM JA5'-"NOIOU LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI-FAMILY LP APN #'S Development Plan# PA3 20-1325 944-370-001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 AIIHOWN .UIHOWN Al5HOWN MEDRIM .UIHOWN LOW .\IIIKIWN lOW .\IIHOWN MEDIUM •·o.c 4"0.C 4"0.C 4"0.C. 4"0.C 4"0.C 4"0.C ec.c. ,·o.c. •·o.c. •·o.c. •·o.c. PLAN! ~ lGAl\ON.ll"OC. 10.\LlON.21"0.C. ,ow MEORIM MEDRIM lo'.EDIUM WW MEDIUM WW MEOIUM WW WW MEDIUM ,ow WW ,ow WW MEDIUM M!OIUM ,ow WW WW WW ,ow MEORIM MEORIM MElllUM ,ow SHEET 4 OF 5 TYPICAL PLANTING ~~- SCole,1'·•10· NORTH~ CITY OF TEMECULA W:~; ~ f- z ci: ll. --- WALL AND FENCE LEGEND TUIIESTEEL VIEW FENCE: J' HIGH TUBE STEEl • COLOR 'IILAC'- PILASIEl!S: 8'·"4 3/8" HIGH CMU SQUARE PILASTER CUSTOM PILASTER CAP WITH CULTURE STONE VENEER TUIIESTEEL VIEW FENCE: 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL. COLOR IILAC("' ____fl__ TUBE STEEL GATE: 6' HIGH TUIIE STEEL MIN. 30' OPENING --COLOR "BLACK" JV\ PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT/ FRONTAGE WALLS/ PILASTERS• CMU IILOCIC WITH STUCCO FINISHES TO COMPLIMENT BUILDINGS / COLORED CONCRETE CAPS I TUBE STEEL GATE: 6' • 7' HIGH DECORAIIVE TUBE STEEL (!) TUBE STEEL VIEW FENCE OR SLUMP BLOCK PERIMETER WALL @ 3"~6" WIDETUBULARSTEHGATEW/2"SQ FRAME AND 1/4" PICKETS, COLOR TO BE BLACK ~ ~ I ~ PO OL G ATE (!) TUBULAR STEEL POST,@ 8'--0'' O.C. MAX. @ TUBULAR STEEL PICKETS EXISTING PHASE 1 ® FINISH GRADE I I ii ii ii Gr ii CD--'" .. QV TU BE STEEL FENC E AT POO L AREA SHEET 5 OF 5 W ALL AND FENCE PLAN LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI-FAMILY LP APN #'S Development Plan # PA3 20-1325 944-370-001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 CJ--r1 ~. I CITY OF TEMECULA £.~~,\l~J ~ 1- z ii' 0. O W N E R 4 P P l !C A N T liOIDCl'oWSiU..ll-f~'fLP n10,0110AHAl(.,t81 :ir:.,~"l(JI ~1~.mw :::, Cl!: =-n:crs. N:. ::~:cr~.~~10! =1t~~T(CI DI .U..COW CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADI NG PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD -- - -- - -+-- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - .c«: - -t- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -- - -\- - -- - - ~ nnr sen CC-1 CONIVIIIAI.QWIINGl'I.MCC-2T0CG-l SYMBOL LEGEND· ---~YCll"IICALll£1AINIHGWAU. ••----•--•NM PATH (l( lRA"1:l 0CTA!l.5 P(IIAIICltTltlSPI.ANS ----PIIOPOll'fui S11 •• 1 1\1.: 1\1.l l't•:,n~b,,,n ll\'AC"1no 1l...,a1,,Jo,,,c.,1) 11,o ro,,.11.11 c,)1J••t1•""1lo..--..led oo /, .. ,ld'"f.' ti I 1. ,\).JI /T,lo,it..J , ~-io,1< 1",A llll,hfo<•"'"'•ISf(lt.,J, l·1i,:l,••M'>•ho.1>~l J\flprnr<"<J1<uN"''U'fl<ll•C,•,.,_,., M•l-~t J 1..-..·.ol•"'•l)l""""'1N'>af\1<,rl\ll<!,.,._,t,:l<\"'r,:1n-Jr-,'>lo:""°" l,t,'>t, I If,! t 11•.I l"·•.•r.X1 of n ,,,nor.•'lf'<l\""!(\<.,lf1J\O h!d.-~..,.,,.,11,n,"-•fof ["<'J"-"•1t>d-lllf,1.1>llJ►-frut,11iw 1>1i!(llnl n 1.2. ( ll-.1 l•~11i.,n 01 ~•lM •RJ •• f\01\,.,...:.l PO.! l,-J k-~,,.. \'uh,• t·IJ•:!.( II,\ O,-..b lr dt 1,ctrrrh~:l.-;,h<'•ii•fil'L•l""'k"~11M , N>/\ fr.ttc 1.-..:mtm ri<, fho.r .,.,n: •J~llm C\l ~, l'IU"I' I 11'•~·;,n..t.-.k"""l ~-rn .1 1N,>1i: U i l.l\h,:I in1u ,r,r :ul<l cllc,i•• 1uri 1,oy •~J,u •hn>,;n,.,oM r.1 ~urr111ut dm e ~L1!r., f,ij ~11i.:111~n,:y •~hid,: :t..,--..--., t,-..,t1k(IJrdJunt n.i<>n ofa U"albanol rcti.:f>o I "·,11,111ufnll .,no.tu"•· <b1>,.,.1}>. !'l•~111~ ""·u. ,,n--. ,1111 :rJJl~""'tl 1"•~~1) l,r,,;. "'lll"n 50 , .. ~ .. r11i,: .... ~t•, .. "'1<'1 of!IM" ,jltJ,.-.:1 prup,:nr All.1.srn -1 i'oaiP,1•<Kl c,i.11u-i....i u..;1,fllilJ&••tf'l i.t b l~>Ullti, ufh< l•N)<II h(1~uf>'.»N I ,l.u"'1i,~n"i:hll,,.b,lotH,-,\(1(,I.IM)"'nu,ble1lkll<"olo l.1w1:u.,o rubho11i;1 ,10IW •J• ltd,l1b,c!p,,,r~, rjrk<n.si--~• l:krtn< \\,fud,:ll1""1il•J 'l"'"""llfl•l'i"N "' fwun:1 1 • ., ••• ..,,..r11nc,,.,,.,..,...r~~n. ... 11.tatu,4;,,;1,.-,,c1"~ lah<n,WiM (,1 Sll,.I 1'"'1"-'of"UIKyp_,..,... :~::~.~f;.1 ~:~~!;""1"•1"',4 ,., SH•t Ni,\ s'n-r notl)p< ... ~. ...... " . " " R•'1-"•..J R<q<i1al UnC"vaod 0.1<11 ~- b ..,.. " ' d ~ ' " T..t.!P.al:i,lf Rc~U<n:J. 210 C,.\,,·cJcd,Unl'"'""<d,.,JG11<il " " " A r.1.iP.,kii -.sp«u P>lll'i dc d2~ eu,·,11.t.u,-.,,.-.rwJ,,.aJll11a1 0.uAroalla tlo 12¥,V)9/l)I.JUI •6~\i o .. ., • ..,,. Clooolfln tloW c..,, ....... Tno• (Th , P,opoo ,IJ sn ... h.. o« C..,.w ,~c,t,... Cun<M-.bllll Type SpnllllaJAJ,010 },'un,l>c, Si.ari c, l\o,ghl Al'"'tn...,.I< k-1 TypdA Y« J )i'"-11 . (l"'"II"' U T)ll01B Ne Co,po,10 U T)'p<jB 11:o E•""'"Room T)ir•'A I EARTHWORK QUANTITIES I I CU T:21.322 C'f I ™"3.!.6 2C'f I I TOTAL[AllntMlll.<: 2J.1&0CYCUT I BASIS or B[ARIHGS fflCB-\Sl!tl"llAAWie fORIIISIIAP ISMCINIUlNtl'llNICIIO CAIXD!lljl,\IIVIJ)(lcalllll\YLOl,IC V-'<.l('fllOAO)IDICIOIIHl111i"1lli' OO TPVI TRM:111111-1,ltlCORIX O ~WAPII00l(l.14.P,,cut1 'JIIIIOJ C!ll3.INClUSIYCR€C~tl" ~COUNIY.CALfORIIA - ....,_,,....,. =~:.:~ ~::'1uu 511WillfllNOCI UUOIIJM -,li"IU1 Cfl:lal:Nt11Ulfl.lfflll50ll1u' WlfllAOCl:OlO~T.\~ll.llflS ~ljlm'SO!';II. -· [A5l[Jl!,IWIJIIICf'AllA1UD;STlbCT 2210 Hl\llllllC 110. PC111!1S,CA tH10 {r..!JiJl-lm UIIC>tOCAll"OINAIM(ll 4U.>$ '&NOOIUI IIO IDll o.tA CA IJ:1IO (r.,l)M-11100 50 CAl CAS COIIP .vi r 1Nlr.lllll0MA MOINIOS,CAtUJ4 (2ll)241•1:100 fl!OHl'iCRCWWIMICl.11Cf/5 IS.41ltSI. MOIMOS.CAl2J/3 (ffl )JU-1121 $0JIHUINCALfORIM(01S011 2~JPll(lf'f'l)ll. IIUQI .U.CAt~) (Hl)Ut•IJO\ SPU lll\lll 1lJJ COITIIAl Al'£. 1111'£11510C.CAl2!o04 (1")717-Mlt J USEM[NIS A.HD Q[QICAJIOH NOTES © ~=~A::"= :;E=~:.o:: = :::'~r= ~N1Al~S.l'Vt~SlllUIIO(IN0.tOlll.MCOl!DlD~11. @ =t~~~lllnt:lHCa~w~s:i:.o~Jo/J' (M[rte(NCY1'£1tQ.!S,PAllctlWAPl10ll,PAACCI.S1-S.~821'/IO-II © f,:t::s:n:k~'!.,PAI~~ :: : :-~~~~ NI) RtCftOCAL -SS A.'ll l!illlSS. f1U PAlat IIAP l1D1.I, P.UCftS l•I, Nl111/S)·l1 GRADtlG CONS TRUCTION NO TE S: @-IXNI IILC 11' nl'l A-ltl.lil lllJllll'IJ Dl'YO"nt O.U R.llll (D-IXNl1UT f"Tlll'l i..laAl l'IJ Clh'fllOC O.U l1l!OIA @-1XN1 1U llfeod:ISlll'll.i l @-C05atlYICOOIO'MPtlCl01:0tCM.IIIQll @--1XN1111.1t1YICOOU'Yl'l'.IClDIOtl:lllffllll ©-1XN1 11.t1 •W.:MJ.l'IJ AIDl lt W.I\M,P lPlll\M @-«NS1Ul w:W1:0(.,_J')a>m"'I .OIIIIDl'IJClh'flllllU.l.l!8.N @-«NIIIUl4'KJlp,;clll(ll,IIIUIIJTffllllllo.ul1'. IOI @-C06ae 1111.it DQ CS.-IU AIDI J(tJAN.!\M @)-COl5 11U ll.lil -l/lUCA llDOI.UOlOll l0iil.101flDWil llll DlfllWI S•!«IC @-IXNl 1t.Cl -.O UllOll SOl'lfll llltW. "- G·J @-COl5 tt.lC I -.,i DQCS.- man: pi.) @-COISlUT OIUl.l ff toa:11'1'.t wm'..l.'I MDlll tliU IS£[ CONCEPTUAL ,I UTILITY PLANS FOR PROPOSED UTILITIES PA20-1325 f g J z 0 >= u :::, ~ V, z 0 u "' 2 0 z CIICOC[l>.IUY DIIA-0.111 ORA.u;cnU,MJlo ,o, CG-1 Df" l 511[[1$ B -.- ' .J ,_r-- ··.. - ·Ji I \ .· / - ~~----~~......,.._ ,....,_ .. -:- . .,; .-.; •MCI-O~Oll'MRO ,.YI ~-o' r (1'~t.u1 r:-l r- .. ~: I I j cu ·uc -~-- -, ---- --~ ' I ,, -~T:~RO 71~ 1r_ GR t,DNG CONS TRUCTION NO TE S· 0-l;IIISatl ,. l"IP£ MMI aGJTDl'UOIJIJ J(JII Q,U n,. I'll! (D-C06-.Clrlll'(t-lQ.lll,0QIYftUD.lAS10.l')W. (D-axs ac 11Y toa1 l W M ©-Q;IIS JUl f ll.M ti/1 1.1 ,U ctOl otlUI.~ @-t1111at1 f ll, M l U' 1.1 /0 ctOltlt«'.l lUl:ll @-IXIISJU:11111-MiltlllCHllCUlll.N,N,IID!l,Ul'IM (D-CM&(lllllll U (I-J)tr:MX lla)l t.lJU IO llnlJ illC.U S.1'0 @-ED61LCl(ICll'Cl:iltllWJl'U01T(JftllUIJQ..:ii @-C06a.t1JWHll0.0Ul lUMOflOU,l'IM @-o;111 w.(1 ~-•/aM.1 DIDIU tll.OI IOIOlllmtwllllll fllU IIO~ @-mis..c 1.-...oD01Bffl1Jlllll,l,l llllOl·I @-ED61L(1JU91 Dll OU'.toal ll'lil @-IXIISIUl((((ltAJIIID0£1,Ul.llOIClrl'{Mt>IIIC1'1\M' ,... I "~-""~~.,- ··-- - ,, I . -1 fir:,~~:} --t---- -~!_'<!,IJ __ {:!CJI. I 9.0Q\I ! -- --1.U-- • 11).J i ~ SC.,.U::\"•Xf U.S£M£HTS AHD QEPIC,UIOH HOIE5 © :1~~~c~S:,,~~~~~~=,~~" Plll tiS IRW (ffT II0.4ott 1,Jl COIICCO .uft.lt ,IKI @ ~~~:~~D.:ir~~~s'~~~ORf~~~=S. PAAC£lllN' JID1l, PAACllS 1-8, Pll8 711/e0--II © ~~l:°1.s~u~tC:~~~S()l.(~T~l~t~~ IICRl$S ,JG CCltt:$$, l'U PNICU IW' JIOlJ,. P.IJIC£lS 1-1,, Pll8 111/81)-81 ® CASC)j(NT ll(IIIC,l.1(0 Ill flt: Cln Of lUl(Q.U fOII Tt..Vnc 5ICt!AI. LOOP D(l(ClOIIS,. PU1 PM<lt W., JlOU, PMIO:\$ 1-1, PIii 111/91)-11 I J z 0 B :::, I,': V) z 0 u °' 2 0 z PA20-1325 - c -- - -- - ' I I I i,·_ GR AIJtjG CONS TRUC TION NO TES: G)-aMac!l'l'lftHOAIIOITll•PUOflDI' t«WmMi @-to5 M ll'hl'£D-l llJll ,U DIYll lll Q.U lll).JOII, (D-IXIIS llll 1r com , ID CIJI 0-CXIIS acr J' /lt.~W Nl'IJI CIDIOt«,l,l uan ©-((16a(1J'/lt.Oi(l1J'Ml'IJIClDIOtlCl,l;.lll'Cl1 ©-CXIIS&Cl•toMCM.IIUWftU.lll.l\Nl.tUMll'IJPUII (J)--aa.sa.t1 lalf'D ~J')COO:II .:N CIJ!lU IUOl'fll uo.um 1111 ©-IDr>&tl, MCI~ liUWltl ,u 01' er nuu.1. s• 4ill {!)-IM 1Ul ai.911JQ.~ l'IJl lit0fl:UU 1'\M @-wistMJ/,)1,-t/ a!IU UDQIS o:ut IOMIOtltDUl,i, 'llllll l'I ~SQ.ltlC @-msaci ffi.lV.DDQIS !ffl/T Illtw Ul. l,l,!·I @-IXl6 U lltl.tt 11Cl 01U1 ~1lPlll @-CCIIS ait Tl<tw.1'111 1Xl(1£11 11l ~MOI ICISJ\IJI fASEMEHIS AHP DEPIClTIOH NOTES © :,~ .. ~~:.,~1:::.c~~r"NIOC:~,~~T P'U tlS l!I\M CN1 N0.40992 ,RC CCllllXO N'll!l.1t,1"6 @ =:::::CA~w~,~~s1r:~~0Rr~~~=s. P/.X(LV.~l1D2l,PAl!CO,..S1-1,Plll811&/fl0•8l © ~~~=~t:rt:\!:~~SCU~l~L~I~ t!CIICSS IJ«> ECJ![SS, PC~ P.'Jl([l ll.l,O llOll, PAACllS 1-ll, P\18 llf/ll0-81 ® CASlW(NIO(l:NCAIEOIOIMECflVIJ(Tl\l(CI.U.fORIIW/lCg{;NALLOOP D[l(CIOflS, ptR PARCH WI' J102l, PAAtt tS 1-8, 1'118 111/eo-61 '"' I PA20-1325 J z 0 B :J °" t;; z 0 u °" 2 0 z • !iii • I HI U\; Ii" 1/J~/11 tHCCJ!(O:IU'f Ol!A-0.IO DIIAWiG l'lU: MJlo 101 l'l'IO.(CINO.: ... SHUTHWIICR, CG-3 Of 3 SIIUIS seALC:M- = . -· =• PLAN=--"' EXTERIOR LIGHT p CGC SECTION 5. ~~L~IION MUST COMPLY WITH ALL LIGHT FIXTURES ARE DARKS KY COMPLIANT LIGHTING NOTES <i> VIA PHO TOC.ELL ~ FLIF.>H PULL aox, TT'P. John Watson Architects I 72 6 Chclha~ ,;, c' Santa Barba~~ CA 9 3 I 0 8 (805 )-969-72 80 = •-~~.3-1:;~f,~~~~=: l A .,f.... .....f. BOLLARD BASE=~ SCALE: NONE DETA_IL_____ @ ~ohn W atson 7 rchitccts, Inc 26 Chclham W . Santa Barb ay CA ara 9 3 I 0 8 (805)-969-72 80 PLAN S O LI D S l/,lE A R E A ll G IIU N G ' ERIES-LED@ """ 0 LA i: :~~ :,,,~j PARK HARBOR- Blllh!\Olt httrlorUlntun ,F-") ;., _Jl~1 ,---'-' / ..... J ·-· .. - _,._ PHlt1100,1JjP(/WB fllltl~O\.\f !Pil'WfJ P,!(1.l~OlAl~PUWB :1_ DSAP SERIES - LED --···- --~-· ~~-~ ~:~~';;;~:~ -- - - ,-:i.~-~.%::..-===::'~ ~--\ e,..\ "'-1 -- '': ·,,. :.· ~:-:-:--:::-::-··--~---;- i\ :.1¢· J l, . M}~- Ii ; ; ~~~;;~ !: . : ' ::.!":.C- :::. :::· ;:· :t::,or-,=- ::· :~ ::: ~--.=r :.,"; :::: :r:: =·~:~·::: ::.:: .:::;,M,ltt' ::~ - ;= :: ~-- .. .. :J :: ~ ~ :: .. e :: ~-----"'~ ~---:::::·.--- Ll6HT ~ PARKIJ.16 GANOPT' : :;:::;.. .... - ~ ... D-Serht1 I 1£()&.,bd ft ... ---~: .,.. J.I "" -.;:;_~_:;.•.·;:::.:-·- · .... ,_, -~ ---· ., .. ~-· TY P IG A L ~ BOLLARD Ll5HT, \!D (·- ,-- ,- ~ .,,_ ..... ~~ ~=-;:_ !/;::.;:.::.- . . ~ y SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE CUT SHEETS El.3 TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG CITY OF TEMECULA PLANNING DEPARTMENT "AS-BUILT" THE RECEIPT OF AS-BUILT PLANS AND CITY'S ACCEPTANCE THEREOF DOES NOT ABSOLVE THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROJECT DESIGN. ENGINEER OF WORK DATE RCE EXP. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as “CEQA”). D. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project. E. The City contracted with Ascent Environmental Inc. for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Ascent Environmental Inc. and City staff concluded the project could not have a significant impact on the environment. Based upon this determination, Ascent Environmental Inc. prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Negative Declaration (“Draft ND”) in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft ND, along with the Draft ND and its Appendices, to the public and other interested parties for a 30-day comment period from May 27, 2021 through June 27, 2021. The City published a Notice of Intent to Adopt for the Draft ND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents were made available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 and on the City of Temecula website. G. During the comment period, the City received two (2) written comments on the Draft ND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. H. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final ND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter. Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final ND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that: A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. B. That the Initial Study/ND has been prepared and circulated in compliance with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the procedures set forth in the ordinances of the City. C. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft ND, the Final ND, and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. D. The Planning Commission has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final ND, the written and oral comments on the Draft ND, the Draft ND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony. E. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Final ND and all comments received regarding the Final ND prior to and at the July 20, 2022 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final ND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final ND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Final ND attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairperson ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Luke Watson Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as “CEQA”). C. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. D. The City contracted with Ascent Environmental Inc. for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Ascent Environmental Inc. and City staff concluded the project could not have a significant impact on the environment. Based upon this determination, Ascent Environmental Inc. prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Negative Declaration (“Draft ND”) in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. E. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft ND, along with the Draft ND and its Appendices, to the public and other interested parties for a 30-day comment period from May 27, 2021 through June 27, 2021. The City published a Notice of Intent to Adopt for the Draft ND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents were made available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 and on the City of Temecula website. F. During the comment period, the City received two (2) written comments on the Draft ND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final ND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. ____, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)”. I. On ______________, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final ND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that: A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. B. That the Initial Study/ND has been prepared and circulated in compliance with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the procedures set forth in the ordinances of the City. C. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft ND, the Final ND, and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. D. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final ND, the written and oral comments on the Draft ND, the Draft ND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony. E. The Planning City Council reviewed the Final ND and all comments received regarding the Final ND prior to and at the ______, 2022 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final ND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final ND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Final ND attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this ___ day of _______, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the ___day of ______ , 2022 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022- ___, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)”. Resolution No. 2022- __ is hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment Application No. PA20-1323, consistent with Government Code section 65358, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest. The current General Plan designation for the project site is a Professional Office (PO) land use as specified in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it allows for high-quality residential development in an area surrounded by residential development that would help to fulfill the City’s regional housing needs, including the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. This General Plan amendment allows for residential use where it otherwise would not be permitted Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED ‘A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)’” in the substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed Project and duly considering the comments received, and following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-___, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323).” F. On _________, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. G. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-___ “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013).” H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. Consistent with Government Code section 65358, the City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: General Plan Amendment A. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest. The current General Plan designation for the project site is a Professional Office (PO) land use as specified in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it allows for high-quality residential development in an area surrounded by residential development that would help to fulfill the City’s regional housing needs, including the City’s Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. This General Plan amendment allows for residential use where it otherwise would not be permitted Section 3. Amendment to General Plan Text. The City Council approves and amends the Land Use Element of the General Plan to revise the General Plan Land Use designation for the parcels within the Rendezvous Phase II project from Professional Office to a Medium Density Residential land use and amends Figure LU-3 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A, “Proposed General Plan” attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Section 4. City Manager Authorization. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to implement this General Plan Amendment. Section 5. Consistency with General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan, as amended by this Resolution, is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan and is consistent with Government Code Section 65300.5. Insofar as other portions of the General Plan need to be revised to effectuate this General Plan Amendment, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make all necessary revisions to effectuate this General Plan Amendment. Section 6. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. Section 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this __ day of ________, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the ___ day of __________, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk PC RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay was approved by the City Council on October 22, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-05. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as approved shall be referred to in this Resolution as the “PDO”. B. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. F. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022- ___”A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-134).” Resolution No. 2022-___ and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Provisions for Fiscal Impact Payments A. The City and owner estimate that the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the area resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the Project will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated as of June, 2022 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City the sum of sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval the Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Application No. PA20-1324, hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Planning Application No. PA20-1324 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal 1 Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community’s labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)” in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Luke Watson Secretary ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay was approved by the City Council on October 22, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-05. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as approved shall be referred to in this Resolution as the “PDO”. B. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. F. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-_____ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324).” H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-_____ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324).” I. On ______________, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-_ __”A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324).” Resolution No. 2022-___ and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Provisions for Fiscal Impact Payments A. The City and owner estimate that the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the area resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the Project will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated as of June, 2022 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City the sum of sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello-Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Planned Development Overlay/Zone Change hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element, as amended. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal 1 Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community’s labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Section 4. Zoning Code Amendment. The City Council hereby amends Chapter 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (PDO-5)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code by amending Article VI, entitled “Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District 5” to read as provided in Exhibit A, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as thought set forth in full. Section 6. Consistency with General Plan. On _________, the City Council adopted Resolution No. ______, which amended the Land Use Element Map of the Temecula General Plan to change the land use designation of the Project area from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density (M) residential. Therefore, the foregoing amendments outlined in this Ordinance are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. Section 7. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 9. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this _____ day of _____, 2022 Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the day of , 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the _____ day of _______, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk 2 Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District Chapter 17.22, Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 Table of Contents 17.22.140 Title 17.22.142 Purpose and Intent 17.22.143 Project Vision 17.22.144 Relationship With Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines 1. Development Standards 2. Design Guidelines 3. Approval Authority 17.22.146 Use Regulations 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses 17.22.150 Design Standards and Setback Standards 17.22.152 Vehicular Circulation System Standards 17.22.154 Architectural and Landscape Design Standards 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board Text of new section 17.22.156: 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board 3 RENDEZVOUS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.140 TITLE Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 shall be known as "PDO-5" (Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.142 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) is intended to provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique residential area within the City. PDO-5 encompasses 22.97 acres and is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Way. PDO-5 consists of Medium Density Residential (7-12.9 dwelling units/acre). The PDO area is surrounded by existing multi-family developments to the north and to the west and existing single-family developments to the south and to the east. This special overlay zoning district regulation is intended to be compatible and complimentary to the existing residential development and M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12.9 dwelling units/acre) proposed as part of the PDO. Performance standards, in addition to those referenced from the City's Development Code and City- wide Design Guidelines, have been provided to ensure internal project compatibility as well as compatibility with the adjacent single-family residential development and to protect these adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Development Code. 17.22.143 PROJECT VISION The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) is intended to provide a comprehensive planning approach to the development of 22.97 acres. The project will include many design features including pedestrian scale of development, unique signage, gathering places, and transit provisions. This is accomplished through its design, development standards and guidelines that will be implemented at the Development Plan stage. A total of two hundred ninety-four (294) apartment units may be developed in the PDO. As depicted on Exhibit A-1, one hundred sixty (160) apartment units may be developed on the upper portion of the PDO (“Upper Site”), which is on the south side, and one hundred thirty-four (134) apartment units may be developed on the lower portion of the PDO (“Lower Site”), which is the North side of the PDO. Large, landscaped buffer areas have been provided within the PDO and the existing single-family development to the east and south. Several obstacles to pedestrian access exist within the PDO, as well as to the existing single-family residential to the east and south, the existing multi-family residential to the north (across Rancho California Road) and the multi-family residential development to the west. A comprehensive sidewalk plan, which has been coordinated 4 with the landscape plan, is included as Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). This plan will foster pedestrian access within the site. When coupled with the existing/proposed pedestrian network, obstacles to pedestrian movement will be greatly reduced. At the time of the Building Department review, the internal access will be reviewed to ensure it complies with the current California Building Code. 17.22.144 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Only multi-family residential land use shall be allowed in the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. 1. Development Standards. a. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.06) that would apply to any development within a Medium Density Residential zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for the PDO except as approved along with this application. This includes site open space and private open space requirements, as well as overall project density. b. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. c. Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. 2. Design Guidelines. The City-Wide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. a. Chapter 5 (Multi-Family Residential Design Guidelines) for the PDO. 3. Approval Authority. The Conceptual Site Plan is depicted in Exhibits A-1 through A-3. Approximate building location, as well as approximate location of parking, drive lanes, and access, are shown on these Exhibits. The Conceptual Landscape Plan is depicted in Exhibit C and the Project Statistics are shown in Exhibits G-1 through G-3. Conformance with these Exhibits, as well as the provisions contained below will allow the Approval Authority for projects approved under PDO-5 as follows: a. The approval requirements contained in the City of Temecula Development Code that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete within the PDO. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 17.22.146 USE REGULATIONS 5 Only multi-family residential land uses shall be allowed in the PDO. 17.22.150 DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The following standards are designed to increase the compatibility within and adjacent to the PDO. A. Building Setbacks. 1. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the eastern property line, which abuts existing single-family residential development. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. 2. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the western property line. 3. All structures shall be setback a minimum of forty-five feet along the southerly property line, which also abuts existing single-family residential development. 4. The northern setback from the property line at Rancho California Road shall be twenty-five feet except for the setback at Building 11, which shall be fifteen feet. B. Pedestrian Linkages. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). C. A pedestrian pathway system shall be provided within the PDO as shown on the Sidewalk Plan. D. Building Height. The height of structures shall not exceed three (3) stories or forty (40) feet in height. E. Trash Enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with landscaping. Exact location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage. F. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided. Final location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer. 17.22.152 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM STANDARDS Vehicular Circulation System Standards have been developed to assure that adequate vehicular access ingress and egress exist for the project, that internal project circulation and vehicle stacking are sufficient and that necessary emergency vehicle access requirements are met. A Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit A) has been prepared with input from the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments. Locations for buildings, access points from Rancho California Road and the western road, drive lanes, parking lots and parking lot landscaping have been provided on the conceptual plan in an effort to depict the overall development of the site. Minor changes or modifications to the conceptual plan 6 may occur provided they are reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula at the development plan stage. Access Points: One access point to the project has been provided to the site from Rancho California Road and one from the westerly drive that is contiguous to the west property line. 1. Access to the PDO shall be provided from the access point on Rancho California Road. 2. A secondary access has been provided along the existing drive that runs along the PDO’s westerly boundary. 17.22.154 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES Unless expressly stated below, Residential Architectural Guidelines for the PDO are contained within Chapter 5 of the City-Wide Design Guidelines. A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Form, Height And Massing The Guidelines contained below correspond to the Conceptual Building Elevations (Elevations), contained in Exhibit D. Final design of the individual buildings will utilize the design concepts depicted on the Elevations and may vary from the Elevations depicted in Exhibit D. • Buildings shall not exceed forty feet (40') in height. • Offsets in planes shall be used to reduce the mass of building walls, accent entry areas, and create architectural interest. • Building forms shall be of simple geometry with sculptural or traditional forms acceptable. • Pediment entries, colorful window and door trim shall be used for accent purposes. • Building entries shall be defined and articulated through the use of items such as columns and stone veneers. • Recessed windows and entryways shall be used, especially at the ground level as they add interest to the product. • Windows or window-type elements are encouraged on second story elements. • Windows on the second floor shall line up with windows on the first floor, making the column/structure apparent. • All sides of the buildings shall receive adequate detail treatment; however, reduced articulation shall be permitted for those sides of the buildings that are not clearly visible from public view. 2. Colors & Materials The colors and materials for the PDO shall be consistent with the color and material 7 boards (Exhibit F). The purpose of the color and material board is to provide continuity between the components of the Rendezvous PDO. A. Colors • The predominant building color includes a mixture of earth tones (grays, whites, yellows, tans and browns), similar to colors already used throughout the City of Temecula, other Southern California cities, Warm or light colors are the most appropriate for trim. • Brighter colors shall be limited to signs, doors, window trim and other detailing related to pedestrian areas. B. Materials • Cement Plaster, or similar materials will be used predominantly throughout as will manufactured natural color stone, wood trellis and traditionally inspired concrete red “S” tile roofing. • Textured concrete tiles may be used on building elevations. • High quality, dark colored roofing, such as concrete S tile are recommended. • Beams, posts and wooden or stone columns shall be simple with camps and toes. Care should be taken so that the width of the column is in proportion to the scale of the building. 3. Roof Forms • Roofs shall be high enough to hide rooftop equipment. • Varied roof heights shall be incorporated to reduce building massing. • The use of cornices is strongly encouraged. B. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Project-Wide Landscaping The landscape theme is intended to support the architectural guidelines by creating screens and buffers where needed and views where opportunities exist. Guidelines: • Plant material selection for street trees shall be determined by the City-Wide Design Guidelines and the Temecula Municipal Code, which shall complement the existing street trees on Rancho California Road. • Introduced plant materials will be installed so that they reflect the surrounding plant species. • Irrigation systems shall include low flow drip systems, consistent with the Section 17.32 of the City's Development Code (Water-Efficient Landscape Design). 2. Project Edges Project edges will be the most visible components of the project. The intent is to provide a comprehensive landscape approach to the project, while paying attention to the particular needs of each edge condition. Plans and Sections are provided to guide future Development Plans in these areas. The Landscape Plan and Section 8 Legend, Plans and Sections are included as Exhibit C. a. Rancho California Road Edge Landscaping along Rancho California Road shall be complimentary to existing landscaping along Rancho California Road, as well as serve to identify the project. Streetscape plantings will be coordinated with interior streetscape and parking treatments as well as with adjacent parcel landscaping. An enhanced project entry will provide a gateway into the project. Reference Exhibits C-1 (Plan) and C-1a (Section): Rancho California Road / Lower Site. . b. Residential (External) /Residential Edge This edge shall serve to buffer the proposed development from the existing single-family residential to the east. A minimum fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer shall be required from the eastern property line to any structure. Evergreen trees with broad canopies may be utilized to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibits C-3 and C-3a: Lower Site Interface at East. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. c. Residential (Internal)/Residential (External) Edge Slopes created on the eastern and southern slopes shall be extensively landscaped to meet current City Development Code standards. Since these are down slopes of various lengths, trees and shrubs are provided near the top of the slope to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibit C-4 (Section): Upper Site Interface at East and Exhibit C-5 (Section): Upper Site Interface at South. 3. Major Entries Special landscaping will occur at the Rancho California Entry that will identify the points of entry and set the tone for the PDO. Plantings will be coordinated with the Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify major entries, as follows. 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Entry Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board 10 EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SECTION LEGEND, PLANS AND SECTIONS Exhibit C-1: Landscape Plan View Rancho California Road / Lower Site Exhibit C-1a Section 1-1 Rancho California Rd. / Lower Site Exhibits C-2 Plan View Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3 Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3a Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-4 6-6 Upper Site Interface at East Exhibits C-5 Section 7-7 Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-6 Plan View Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-7 Elevation Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-8 Plan View Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-9 Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 1) Exhibit C-9a Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 2) Exhibit C-4 11 Guidelines: • Accent trees with fall or flowering color should be used as identify plantings. • Low-scale walls, shrubs, and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used to highlight key areas, such as the base of project entry monuments. • Trees should be massed to create an effect similar to native plantings in undisturbed areas. 12 Secondary Entry The secondary entry is located at the westerly edge of the project along an un-named road between this project and the multi-family development to the west. Design elements may include accent plantings, low scale walls, and monumentation. Guidelines: • Shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used at the base of project entry monumentation. • Accent trees, such as palm trees or crape myrtle varieties should be used to identify entries. 13 Project-Wide Hardscape Concept Hardscape elements shall be used in coordination with the architecture and landscaping to provide a link between the street edge and the development. Attention to hardscape details creates a strong sense of community by relating different areas of the developments to an overriding theme. In addition, property hardscaping can improve pedestrian safety, movement and visual enjoyment of public areas. a. Paving Materials The use of enriched paving treatment has been recommended for the major entry into the site and intersections to highlight key areas of the streetscape. Guidelines: • Paving materials that incorporate natural rock or stone are highly recommended. • Major intersection and project entry crosswalks shall be highlighted by enriched paving treatments such as stamped, colored concrete, interlocking pavers or cobblestones to visually denote crosswalks. • Near buildings, paving materials should be consistent with major intersection treatments, using interlocking pavers, cobblestone, natural stone, or textured concrete. 14 EXHIBIT SECTION .17.22.156 C SMOOTH CONCRETE BANOS TYPICAL ------------------- EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL ---- , INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL □' □ (_ □ PLAN VIEW FREE STANDING PILASTER w/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE · & BUILT-IN LAMP TYPICAL Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 1 NTS 15 EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.1S6 C INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL ----------------- EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL---- COBBLE STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE TYPICAL--- n I I I j I I I FREE STANDING PILASTER W/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE & BUILT"'."IN LAMP TYPICAL PLAN VIEW Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 2 NTS _ □ 16 b. Street Furniture Hardscape elements such as benches, bollards, paving and light standards shall reflect the theme of the overall PDO, complimenting the architecture and landscape. Materials used in construction of street furniture should complement architectural materials used on adjacent buildings. Safety and durability need special consideration. Guidelines: • Natural stone, rock, textured concrete, wood, or metal are all acceptable building materials for street furniture. • Street furniture should be located within gathering and/or shaded seating areas within the property. • All benches should be of simple design of wrought-iron metal, or concrete with supports and scroll detailing and finished natural wood slats for the sitting area. • Trash receptacles and other minor details must relate to the architectural style of buildings. 17 c. Walls and Fences When necessary for security or to mitigate grading, walls or retaining walls and fences shall reinforce the project's identity and image. The material, style, and height of walls and fences shall in order to ensure visual consistency, provide an element of continuity throughout the property. Guidelines: • Construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project architecture with dark-toned hues and earthtone colors preferred. The use of a hedge/bollard treatment is acceptable and encouraged. • For walls built to screen ancillary structures adjacent to buildings, such as trash enclosures, construction materials should complement the architecture. • The horizontal mass of continuous walls should be softened by landscape planting and vines. • Tubular steel or an equivalent may be used for fencing. 4. Lighting Concept In the design of lighting, careful consideration must be given the overall architectural theme as well as to the safety of the site users. An emphasis should be made to emphasize human scale in public areas adjacent to buildings and along walks. Guidelines: • Warm white lighting is encouraged, bright colored or blinking lights shall not be allowed. • Light standards will blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, and other hardscape elements. • Design and placement of site lighting must minimize glare affecting adjacent properties, buildings and roadways. • Natural stone and concrete may be used for light standard bases. • All lighting shall be consistent with the Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. • "Old town Style" lighting fixtures, either attached to building or pedestal mounted along pedestrian walkways and gathering areas shall be utilized. 18 EXHIBIT SECTION 17. 22.156 C LIGHTING STANDARD 19 5. Monument Signs a. General Requirements • All portions of Entry Monuments including the base and cap, shall be constructed with materials and colors as shown on Exhibit F. All monument signs shall include the name of the project and the lettering shall be no higher than 19” and no smaller than three inches (3") in height. Low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or annual color shall surround the base of the sign. PC RESOLUTION NO. 22- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. E. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. ___ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325).” G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Development Plan application PA20-1325, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code section 17.05.010 hereby finds, determines and declares that Development Plan application No. PA20-1325 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment the project site will allow for a multifamily residential community. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the Project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment, and Development Code. The Project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE” (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)” in substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 22- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Luke Watson Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. E. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-___ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013).” G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-__, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED ‘A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325).’” H. On _________, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-___ “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013).” Resolution No. 2022-___ and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section, 17.05.010, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment the project site will allow for a multifamily residential community. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-1325, a Development Plan application for a 134 unit apartment community, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. ____, “AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324).” Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this ______ day of _______. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the _____ day of ________, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20 -1325 A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres located within the existing PDO-5 on the south side of Rancho California Road, 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-001 944-370-005 944-370-006 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-012 944-370-013 Residential (Greater Than 14.1 du/ac) MSHCP Category: Residential-Attached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Multi-Family Multi-Family Attached (5 or More Units) _____, 2022 _____, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 19 Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANT ACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition Failure to submit the Notice of Determination will also result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Determination are Two Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety-Eight Dollars ($2,598.00) which includes the Two Thousand Five Hundred and Forty- Eight Dollars ($2,548.00) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor – County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. 1. General Requirements Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Page 2 of 19 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved Development Plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 3. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved Development Plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Consistency with Planned Development Overlay. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) 5. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 6. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 7. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 8. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 9. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 10. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. 11. Page 3 of 19 Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staff's prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco Dusty Dream (DE6312) Stucco Handwoven (DE6200) Garage Door Northern Territory (DEA158) Stucco Soft Ivory (DE6155) Stucco Vanilla Shake (DEW325) Stucco Clouded Vision (DE6380) Stucco Creme Fraiche (DET654) Stucco Drifting Downstream (DET605) Stucco Grain Mill (DET665) French Limestone French White Storefront Dark Bronze Clay Roof S Tile Barcelona Colosseum Travertine Roman Chiseled Limestone Cayenne San Canyon Flagstone Cream Chiseled Limestone Sunriver Blend 12. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 13. Page 4 of 19 Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. Trash enclosures shall have working locking mechanisms on all access gates, including pedestrian access gates, that shall remain locked and accessible only to authorized users (residents, commercial tenants, etc.) during times when pick up service is not scheduled. Trash enclosures shall have anti-dumping design features incorporated into the design of the trash enclosure, which prevent the transfer of materials over or around the trash enclosure. Anti-dumping features must be designed in complimentary design manner to the existing or proposed building, and shall not include chain link fence, razor wire, or barbed wire.” The area between the top of the wall and the top of the enclosure shall not remain open and available for dumping or other activities. 14. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 15. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 16. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City’s franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City’s franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City’s franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 17. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City’s Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 18. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on-site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. 19. Page 5 of 19 Fiscal Impact Analysis Compliance. The Project is required to address impacts to the City’s budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project (“City Services Deficit”). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated June 9, 2022 (“FIA”), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum as described in the June 9, 2022 Final FIA per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount as described in the June 9, 2022 Final FIA of the previous year’s payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. “Occupied Residential Property” means an assessor’s parcel within the project for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City’s budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. 20. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 21. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, sub ject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 22. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment.” 23. Page 6 of 19 Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: “No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre-grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on-site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on-site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist.” If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 24. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the “most likely descendant(s)” of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. 25. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 26. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 27. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. 28. Page 7 of 19 Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 29. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 30. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, “The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection.” 31. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 32. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 33. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, “Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond.” The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 34. Page 8 of 19 Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 35. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. 36. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: • Tubular steel fencing around the pool area and northern, eastern, and western boundaries. - Geogrid retaining wall in front of Building 11 37. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 38. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 39. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 40. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after-thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 41. Smoking in Residential Units. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, “Smoking in Multi-Unit Residences,” the developer shall submit a site plan to the City for review and approval, designating a minimum of 25 percent of the units within the project as non-smoking units. 42. Community Wide Public Benefit. The applicant shall provide a cash payment in the amount of $500,000.00 to the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the first residential multi family or commercial building permit. This payment will fulfill the requirements of the Growth Management Plan for the proposed project. 43. Fiscal Impact Analysis Covenant. The owner of record shall record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, which shall place future buyers of the residential dwelling units on notice of their obligation to pay the City the sum as provided in the Fiscal Impact Analysis on file with the City of Temecula. The covenant shall be recorded in the official records of the County of Riverside prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, and a copy of the covenant shall be filed with the office of the city clerk. 44. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Page 9 of 19 Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 45. Screening of Loading Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 46. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 47. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 48. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 49. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 50. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City’s parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in-lieu fees equivalent to 1.63 acres of parkland, based upon the City’s then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 8.7% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. 51. Outside Agencies Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated December 16, 2020, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier’s check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 52. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health’s transmittal dated January 22, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 53. Page 10 of 19 Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District’s transmittal dated December 21, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 54. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District’s transmittal dated December 22, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 55. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated February 4, 2021, a copy of which is attached. 56. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 57. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 58. Precise Grading Permit. A p recise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 59. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 60. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 61. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 62. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 63. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 64. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 65. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 66. Page 11 of 19 Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 67. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 68. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 69. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 70. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 71. RCFC&WCD Encroachment Permit. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 72. Page 12 of 19 Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 73. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 74. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 75. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 76. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 77. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 78. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 79. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map Number 38043 shall be approved and recorded. 80. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer-of-record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil’s engineer-of-record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). 81. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 82. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 83. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 84. Page 13 of 19 Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 85. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 86. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 87. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 88. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights-of-way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. 89. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi-family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. 90. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. 91. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. 92. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. 93. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On-site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. 94. Page 14 of 19 Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 95. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 96. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance-rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 97. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" 98. FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6” x 4” x (2) 2 ½” outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all multi-family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 99. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 100. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi-family projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 101. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section15.16.020). 102. Page 15 of 19 All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 103. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 104. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 105. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on-site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 106. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. A set of plans and hydraulic calculations are required for each building structure. A permit will be required for each structure, not model type. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 107. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. A set of plans and permits are required for each structure, not model type. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 108. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy Address Directory (Multi-Family). A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 109. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 110. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 111. Page 16 of 19 Knox Box. A “Knox-Box” shall be provided. The Knox-Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 112. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi-family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 113. POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 114. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by “would-be burglars.” Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 11 5. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 116. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 117. Parking Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 118. Exterior Door Lighting. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one-foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 119. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 120. Outdoor Lighting During Non-Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor’s order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non-business hours. The order, in part, states, “All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non-business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property.” Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 121. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. 122. Page 17 of 19 Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 123. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi-tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 124. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted “International Orange.” 125. Rooftop Addressing. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine-inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine-inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 126. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. 127. Page 18 of 19 Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that “the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life.” The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children’s play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines-of-sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 128. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 129. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. 130. Page 19 of 19 235635 JASON E. UHLEY General Manager-Chief Engineer 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT December 16, 2020 City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 Attention: Scott Cooper Re: PA 20-1325 and Tract 38043 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above-referenced project transmittal, received November 23, 2020. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ☒ This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ☐ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, ________. The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ☐ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. 235635 City of Temecula - 2 - December 16, 2020 Re: PA 20-1325 and Tract 38043 ☒ This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (☐Murrieta Valley ☒Temecula Valley ☐ Santa Gertrudis Valley ☐Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ☒ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, Temecula Valley – Rancho California Road Storm Drain. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ☐ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: John Hildebrand SLJ:blm:mc County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 ● RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 KEITH JONES, DIRECTOR Office Locations ● Blythe ● Corona ● Hemet ● Indio ● Murrieta ● Palm Springs ● Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org January 22, 2021 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA – PA20-1325 TEMECULA VILLAGE PHASE II DP: APN: 944-370-001 Dear Mr. Cooper: The project listed in the subject heading is proposing a development plan to allow for the construction of 134 unit apartment community located within the existing PDO-5 on the south side of Rancho California Road, 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive, in the city of Temecula. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s) listed in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER This project is is proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as, all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM Based on the information provided in the environmental assessment document previously submitted for the first phase of this project and did include this APN, and with the provision that the information was accurate and representative of site conditions, RCDEH-ECP (Riverside County Department of Environmental Health – Environmental Cleanup Program) concludes no further environmental assessment is required for this project. If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB) Prior to conducting a building permit final, the facility shall require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 358- 5055 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES – PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD/POOL FACILITY Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate pood plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite “A” Murrieta CA 92563 Please contact your local DES office located in Murrieta at (951)461-0284. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim@rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Supervising REHS Department of Environmental Health February 4, 2021 Project No. 11760.020 City of Temecula, Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review #3 Proposed Temecula Village Apartments – Phase 2 (PA20-1325) Rancho California Road, Temecula, California Reference: EEI, Response to Geotechnical Peer Review, Proposed Temecula Village Apartments – Phase 2 (PA20-1325), Rancho California Road, Temecula, California, Project No 11760.020, dated January 21, 2021, EEI Project PWD-72988.4b, In accordance with your request, we reviewed the above referenced report by EER in response to our Peer Review Comments #2 dated January 21, 2021. It is our opinion that EEI has substantially addressed our comments. Although not explicitly stated in the above response, we expect EEI to further verify the potential for expansive soils on this site and make the structural engineer aware of such condition so any slab-on-grade foundations are designed accordingly and comply with requirements of 2019 Building Code. Otherwise, no further action is required from our peer review viewpoint with the regard to the submitted report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to City and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any question. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Robert F. Riha, CEG 1921 Senior Principal Geologist Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE 2641 Principal Engineer Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF copy via email) PC RESOLUTION NO. 22- A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1326)” Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-___, “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325).” Resolution No. 2022-___ and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map application PA22-1326, makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 38043 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Municipal Code, and the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the Development Code, General Plan, and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The proposed Tentative Tract Map combines eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel for residential development. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) (SCH# 2021050549) was prepared. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on developed and vacant property and does not propose any grading or construction. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision design and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project prior to the recordation of a Final Tentative Map. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1326)” in substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit “A”, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman ATTEST: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Luke Watson Secretary RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1326) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively “the Project”) were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines (“CEQA”). The Draft ND was prepared under staff’s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The “Final ND” consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-_____ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013).” F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-______ “A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPRXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326)”. G. On _________, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. H. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-___ “A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN’S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)”. Resolution No. 2022-___ and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. The City Council in approving the Tentative Parcel Map hereby makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 38043 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Municipal Code, and the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the Development Code, General Plan, and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The proposed Tentative Tract Map combines eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel for residential development. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) (SCH# 2021050549) was prepared. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on developed and vacant property and does not propose any grading or construction. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision design and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City’s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project prior to the recordation of a Final Tentative Map. Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula hereby approves Planning Application No. PA20-1326, Tentative Tract Map 38043 to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. (APNs: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013), subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. ____“AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324).” Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this ______ day of ______. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the _______day of _______, 2022 by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: Project Description: PA20 -1326 A Tentative Tract Map to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel under TTM 38043 Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-001 944-370-005 944-370-006 944-370-007 944-370-008 944-370-010 944-370-012 944-370-013 Residential (Greater Than 14.1 du/ac) MSHCP Category: Residential-Attached DIF Category: TUMF Category: Quimby Category: Approval Date: Expiration Date: Residential-Multi-Family Multi-Family Attached (5 or More Units) _____, 2022 _____, 2025 New Street In-lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements Page 1 of 6 Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys’ Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively “Indemnitees”) from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys’ fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission’s actions, this approval and the City Council’s actions, related entitlements, or the City’s environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City’s determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 1. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved Tentative Map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 2. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan 3. Consistency with Planned Development Overlay. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) 4. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. 5. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer’s responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. 6. Page 2 of 6 Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. 7. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 8. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. 9. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 10. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 11. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 12. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 13. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. 14. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 15. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have executed subdivision monumentation agreement and posted securities. 16. Right-of-Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 17. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. 18. Page 3 of 6 Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District; b. Southern California Edison Company or other affected agencies 19. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 20. Easements. Note the following: a. An easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: “Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions.” 21. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. 22. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction-phase pollution-prevention controls to adequately address non-permitted runoff. Refer to the City’s Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 23. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 24. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project’s Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City’s storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 25. Page 4 of 6 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement.. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project-specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 26. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 27. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 28. RCFC&WCD Encroachment Permit. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 29. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site’s soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 30. Geological Report. The developer shall comply with the recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 31. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document’s format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 32. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 33. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non-compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. 34. Page 5 of 6 Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 35. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 36. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 37. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City’s Paving Notes. 38. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map Number 38043 shall be approved and recorded. 39. Precise Grading Plan. The building pad(s) shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. 40. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 41. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 42. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 43. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. 44. Page 6 of 6 Final Negative Declaration can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA 555 W. Beech Street, Suite 460  San Diego, California 92101  PHONE: 619 718 9500  FAX: 619 718 9508 22059kal WWW.KEYSERMARSTON.COM 19454.051.001 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BERKELEY A. JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHY C. KELLY DEBBIE M. KERN DAVID DOEZEMA KEVIN FEENEY LOS ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAMES A. RABE GREGORY D. SOO-HOO KEVIN E. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY TIM BRETZ SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA MEMORANDUM To: Scott Cooper, Associate Planner II City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis I. INTRODUCTION A. Objective In accordance with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.’s (KMA’s) agreement for consulting services with the City of Temecula (City), KMA has undertaken a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for the Rendezvous project (Project) proposed by Rendezvous Multi-Family LP (Applicant). The Project is planned to include 134 rental apartment units. The Project will be located at the southwest quadrant of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive (Project Site). The Project Site is located in a Planned Development Overlay with an underlying land use of Professional Office (PO). The Applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment to develop Medium Density Residential (M). This FIA prepared by KMA evaluated the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the proposed Project over a 20-year period. The 20-year period begins at the completion and occupancy of the Project’s first residential units, which is assumed to be Fiscal Year (FY) 2024. B. Methodology In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: • Reviewed background materials and planning/zoning documents relevant to the Project and the Site. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 2 22059kal 19454.051.001 • Reviewed the City’s FY 2021 General Fund Operating Budget to understand the City’s fiscal condition and revenue/expenditure parameters. • Interviewed key City staff regarding cost-of-service structure and approach to provide services to the Project. • Collected and reviewed demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. • Collected and reviewed residential market data to substantiate inputs provided by the Applicant. • Responded to follow-up comments and additional market data provided by the Applicant. • Estimated recurring annual revenues and municipal service expenditures as a result of the Project. C. Report Organization Following this introduction: • Section II presents a summary of the KMA key findings. • Section III provides a projection of the fiscal impact of the Project on the City’s General Fund over the 20-year period. • Finally, Section IV presents limiting conditions pertaining to this report. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Project – 20-Year Fiscal Impact • The Project is estimated to yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund, each year, over the projected 20-year period. • The major revenue categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include indirect (off-site) sales tax, Measure S revenues, property tax, property tax in-lieu of vehicle license fee (VLF), and franchise fees. • The major expenditure categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include Police, Fire, Public Works, Community Development, and Community Development. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 3 22059kal 19454.051.001 • The Project’s fiscal impact is estimated at negative $6,000, or negative $44 per unit, in stabilized Year 1 (FY 2024 dollars) and is projected to reach negative $124,000, or negative $928 per unit, in Year 20 (FY 2043 dollars), as shown in Table II-1 below. Table II-1: Fiscal Impact of Project FY 2024 FY 2043 General Fund Revenues $164,000 $260,000 General Fund Expenditures ($170,000) ($384,000) Annual Net Fiscal Impact to City Deficit per Unit per Year Revenue to Expense Ratio ($6,000) ($44) 0.96 ($124,000) ($928) 0.68 III. 20-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT A. Overview of Methodology This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the fiscal impact on the City’s General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed Project. The detailed KMA 20-year fiscal impact model is provided in Appendices A and B of this report and summarized below. Demographic and Economic Overview Table III-1 presents the findings of the KMA review of demographic and economic factors for the City. The data consist of population, number of housing units, and total jobs. More detail is presented in Appendix A, Table A-1. Table III-1: Demographic and Economic Overview, City of Temecula 2020 Estimate Population 111,970 Housing Units 36,550 Jobs 54,313 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 4 22059kal 19454.051.001 Overview of City General Fund Budget Table III-2 below provides an overview of the City’s FY 2021 Revised General Fund budget. A more detailed analysis can be found in Appendix A, Table A-2. As shown, the City was operating at a net surplus of $218,000 in FY 2021. Appendix A, Tables A-3 and A-4 also show the department revenues and expenditures used to calculate the per capita impacts to the General Fund from the development of the proposed Project. The revenues shown are strictly departmental revenues and exclude such revenues as property and sales tax, which are estimated based on projected increases in assessed value and taxable sales as a result of development of the Project, respectively. The expenditures used in this analysis reflect a deduction for citizen/user payments in the form of Charges for Services to yield net (unreimbursed) expenditures. B. Key Assumptions – Project As shown in Table III-3 below, the Project will include 134 rental apartment units. A more detailed description of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-2. Table III-3: Project Description Site Area 7.60 Net Acres Apartments – Rental 134 Units Density 18 Units/Net Acre Table III-4 presents the assumed absorption schedule for the Project. It is anticipated that for each product type, the first occupancy and stabilized occupancy will occur by FY 2024. A more detailed analysis of the projected annual absorption of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-3. Table III-2: City of Temecula, Mid-Year FY 2021 Revised General Fund Budget General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Net Surplus/(Deficit) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio $79,536,000 ($79,318,000) $218,000 1.00 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 5 22059kal 19454.051.001 C. Key Assumptions to Fiscal Impact Projection General Approach Assumptions used in the FIA are based on an assessment of future circumstances regarding population, employment, property valuation, and taxable sales. Table III-5 below provides a summary of the key assumptions used in this analysis. Table III-5: Key Assumptions Population Resident Equivalents Residential Value 2.00 0.33 $350,000 Persons per Unit Employees per Resident Per Unit (FY 2021) (1) (1) KMA estimate. Based on review of recent multi-family residential building sales in Temecula and North San Diego County. The FIA also estimates other General Fund revenues and expenditures based on a modified per capita measure known as “resident equivalents.” The approach combines residents and employees to form a single service population. As summarized below, the resident equivalent approach weighs an employee as 0.33 residents, such that three employees are viewed as having the same impact as one resident. Table III-6: Total Resident Equivalents Total Population Total Employment Total Population + Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (1) City of Temecula 111,970 54,313 166,283 129,893 Rendezvous Project 255 0 255 255 (1) Assumes a resident equivalent factor of 0.33 (three employees have approximately the same impact as one resident). Table III-4: Anticipated Schedule of Development (1) FY 2024 FY 2025 Total Apartments – Rental 134 0 134 (1) Assumes construction begins 7/1/22 with an opening date of 1/1/24. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 6 22059kal 19454.051.001 General Fund Revenues This section discusses the recurring General Fund revenue assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the proposed Project. Annual recurring revenues generated by the Project, such as Property Tax and Sales and Use Tax, were estimated based on assumed real estate market factors such as market values/rents for the residential units. One-time revenues, such as Development Impact Fees and building permits used to offset one-time City costs, were not evaluated in this FIA. To reflect pre-COVID-19 pandemic operating levels, Franchise Fees; Licenses and Permits; Fines and Forfeitures; and other revenues were estimated by using a three (3)-year historical average of actual revenue received from FY 2018 to FY 2020. The historical average figure was then divided by the applicable service population to estimate a per capita or “per resident equivalent” factor. This factor was then applied to the number of new residents anticipated for the Project. As shown in Table III-7 below, KMA applied the following escalation factors to estimate the annual General Fund revenues to the City over a 20-year period. The annual escalation factors were based on KMA’s review of recent historical valuation trends in the City, as well as discussions with the City’s Finance Department. Table III-7: Annual Revenue Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Assessed Value (1) Pre-Build-out Post-Build-out Sales Tax Measure S (2) Special Tax (Measure C) (3) Franchise Fees Other General Fund Revenues 5.0% 2.0% 3.0% 3.0% 0.0% 1.5% 2.5% (1) Reflects assumed market escalation. (2) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (3) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. General Fund Expenditures This section discusses the recurring annual General Fund expenditure assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the Project at build-out. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 7 22059kal 19454.051.001 Annual recurring expenditures, including Fire, Public Works, and City Council, were estimated by applying a per capita or “per resident equivalent” cost estimate to the number of new residents anticipated from build-out of the Project, with the exception of Police. To estimate Police expenditures, KMA applied the Project’s pro rata share of one (1) new police officer, at an approximate annual cost of $352,000, per 1,000 population added to the City. The City’s Asset Management Fund, a direct interfund transfer from the Measure S Fund into four (4) separate Asset Management Funds (Street Replacement Fund, Vehicles/Equipment Fleet Replacement Fund, Facilities Replacement Fund, and Technology Replacement Fund), was also included in addition to the General Fund expenditure analysis. Annual escalation factors for each major expenditure category were estimated by KMA based on five- year financial projections for the General Fund presented in the City’s Budget. As shown in Table III-8, General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase at escalation rates ranging between 2.0% and 5.0% per year. KMA also applied a marginal cost adjustment to each expenditure category to reflect that General Fund expenditures do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services, such as overhead and administrative functions within City government. As shown in Table III-8, the marginal cost adjustments assumed by KMA ranged between 0% (no adjustment to per capita assumptions) to 100% (expenditures not impacted by the Project). To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 8 22059kal 19454.051.001 Table III-8: Annual Expenditure Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Marginal Cost Impact Adjustment (1) Police Public Works – Land Development, Public Works, etc. Fire Public Works – Parks & Maintenance Community Development Finance City Clerk Retiree Medical Contribution City Attorney City Council Community Support PERS Replacement Benefit Property Tax Administration Asset Management Fund General Government 5.00% 2.50% 5.00% 2.50% 2.75% 2.75% 3.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.75% 2.00% 3.00% 2.00% 2.50% 2.50% 5.0% 10.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 30.0% 90.0% 40.0% 40.0% 80.0% 100.0% 30.0% 0.0% 40.0% (1) Reflects adjustment to expenditure categories that do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between population growth and demand for municipal services. For example, an increase in population will demand 95% of Police municipal services expenditures per net new resident equivalent. D. Annual Fiscal Impact to General Fund General Fund Revenues Table III-9 summarizes the KMA estimate of recurring General Fund revenues during the Project’s build- out year (FY 2024). As shown, Sales Tax and Measure S revenues, in the form of off-site resident spending captured within the City, represent the largest components of General Fund revenues as a result of the Project. The Project’s 255 new residents are expected to generate $80,200 of net new revenues (in the form of Sales Tax/Measure S revenues) to the City in FY 2024. This represents about 48.8% of total revenues generated by the Project. Property Tax and Property Tax In-Lieu of Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues are the next largest source of General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project’s 134 residential units. In FY 2024, the Project is projected to generate approximately $27,000 in Property Tax and $30,600 in Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF revenues. In combination, these sources represent 35.1% of the total General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 9 22059kal 19454.051.001 The other sources, including Franchise Fees, Property Transfer Tax, Measure C, Franchise Fees, and all other revenue sources, are anticipated to account for the remaining 16.1% of General Fund revenues generated by the Project. General Fund Expenditures As shown in Table III-10, the total annual General Fund expenditures to provide services to the Project are estimated at $170,000 in FY 2024. Major expenditure categories were estimated based on projections from current service levels. As shown, the Project’s pro rata cost for Police represents the largest of the Project-generated expenditures at $98,800, or 58.2% of total expenditures. Fire services represent the second largest expenditure at $20,800, or 12.2% of the total Project- generated expenditures. The remaining departmental expenditures, including, but not limited to, Public Works, Asset Management Fund, and General Government, account for a combined $50,300, or 29.6% of total expenditures. Table III-9: General Fund Revenues in FY 2024 Total % of Total Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax – Resident Spending Measure S – Resident Spending (1) Measure C (2) Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In – Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues (Rounded) $27,000 $30,600 $3,000 $41,600 $38,600 $7,500 $7,700 $600 $1,500 $200 $5,400 $500 $164,000 16.4% 18.6% 1.8% 25.3% 23.5% 4.6% 4.7% 0.4% 0.9% 0.1% 3.3% 0.3% 100.0% (1) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (2) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 10 22059kal 19454.051.001 Table III-10: General Fund Expenditures in FY 2024 Total % of Total Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works – Land Development, etc. Public Works – Park Maintenance Fire (1) Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures (Rounded) $98,800 $800 $100 $6,200 $2,000 $1,200 $4,500 $6,700 $13,400 $8,800 $20,800 $100 $200 $0 $6,300 $170,000 58.2% 0.5% 0.1% 3.6% 1.2% 0.7% 2.6% 3.9% 7.9% 5.2% 12.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 3.7% 100.0% (1) Expenditures are net of the County Structure Fire Protection Tax. Annual Fiscal Impact Comparison of the annual revenues and annual expenditures generated by the Project indicates that it will yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City’s General Fund each year over the 20-year period. As shown in Table III-11, the Project’s net fiscal impact is estimated at negative $6,000, or negative $44 per unit, at build-out in Year 1 (FY 2024). The Project’s net fiscal impact reaches negative $124,000, or negative $928 per unit, by Year 20 (FY 2043). A more detailed analysis is presented in Appendix B. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 11 22059kal 19454.051.001 Table III-11: Annual General Fund Impact Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues (1) General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year (2) Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 2024 $164,000 $170,000 ($6,000) ($44) 0.96 2025 $168,000 $177,000 ($9,000) ($69) 0.95 2026 $172,000 $185,000 ($13,000) ($96) 0.93 2027 $176,000 $193,000 ($17,000) ($124) 0.91 2028 $180,000 $201,000 ($21,000) ($154) 0.90 2029 $185,000 $210,000 ($25,000) ($187) 0.88 2030 $189,000 $219,000 ($30,000) ($221) 0.86 2031 $194,000 $229,000 ($35,000) ($258) 0.85 2032 $199,000 $238,000 ($39,000) ($297) 0.84 2033 $204,000 $249,000 ($45,000) ($338) 0.82 2034 $208,000 $260,000 ($52,000) ($383) 0.80 2035 $214,000 $271,000 ($57,000) ($430) 0.79 2036 $219,000 $283,000 ($64,000) ($480) 0.77 2037 $224,000 $296,000 ($72,000) ($533) 0.76 2038 $230,000 $309,000 ($79,000) ($590) 0.74 2039 $235,000 $322,000 ($87,000) ($649) 0.73 2040 $241,000 $337,000 ($96,000) ($712) 0.72 2041 $247,000 $352,000 ($105,000) ($780) 0.70 2042 $253,000 $367,000 ($114,000) ($852) 0.69 2043 $260,000 $384,000 ($124,000) ($928) 0.68 (1) Includes Project-generated Measure S revenues. (2) Represents annual General Fund impact per unit based on anticipated annual absorption for the Project. Full build-out of the Project occurs in FY 2024. IV. LIMITING CONDITONS 1. The KMA analysis is based, in part, on data provided by secondary sources, such as state and local governments, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. While KMA believes that these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. 2. A projection of economic impacts is inherently based on judgment. While KMA considers these projections reasonable for planning purposes, it is the nature of forecasting that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes may be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, may require review or revision of this report. To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 12 22059kal 19454.051.001 3. The projections of future economic impact do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and national recession that is likely to follow. 4. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, Project-specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 5. Any estimates of revenue or cost projections are based on the best Project-specific and fiscal data available at this time as well as experience with comparable projects. They are not intended to be projections of actual future performance of any specific project. 6. Revenue estimates are based on the assumption that sufficient market support exists for the proposed uses and that the Project will achieve industry standard productivity levels. 7. KMA assumes that all applicable laws and governmental regulations in place as of the date of this document will remain unchanged throughout the projection period of our analysis. In the event that this does not hold true, i.e., if any tax rates change, the analysis would need to be revised. 8. Value estimates assume that any necessary entitlements or zoning changes for development can be obtained in a reasonable time frame. 9. Value estimates assume that property titles are good and marketable; no title search has been made, nor has KMA attempted to determine property ownership. The value estimates are given without regard to any questions of boundaries, encumbrances, liens, or encroachments. 10. Property tax projections reflect KMA's understanding of the assessment and tax apportionment procedures employed by the County. The County procedures are subject to change as a reflection of policy revisions or legislative mandate. While we believe our estimates to be reasonable, taxable values resulting from actual appraisals may vary from the amounts assumed in the projections. 11. No assurances are provided by KMA as to the certainty of the projected tax revenues shown in this document. Actual revenues may be higher or lower than what has been projected and are subject to valuation changes resulting from new developments or transfers of ownership not specifically To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous – Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 13 22059kal 19454.051.001 identified herein, actual resolution of outstanding appeals, future filing of appeals, or the non- payment of taxes due. 12. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective, new, or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). 13. KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor to the City and does not assume any fiduciary duty hereunder, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty to the City pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act with respect to the services provided hereunder and any information and material contained in KMA’s work product. 14. The City shall discuss any such information and material contained in KMA’s work product with any and all internal and/or external advisors and experts, including its own municipal advisors, that it deems appropriate before acting on the information and material. attachments APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS RENDEZVOUS Demographic Profile and City of Temecula General Fund Budget DEMOGRAPHICS DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - CITY OF TEMECULA, 2020 ESTIMATES (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Population Population 111,970 Average Household Size 3.24 Jobs (2)54,313 II.Housing Units Single-Family 30,001 82.1% Multi-Family 6,387 17.5% Mobile Homes 162 0.4% Total 36,550 100.0% III.Occupied Units 34,511 IV.Percent Vacant 5.6% (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) TABLE A-1 2020 Estimates U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL FUND BUDGET - FY 2021 OPERATING BUDGET RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Revised Budget I.Revenues Property Tax $9,226,610 Sales and Use Tax $36,177,000 (Less) Sales Tax Sharing Agreement ($1,245,053) Franchise Fees $3,562,656 Transient Occupancy Tax $2,620,575 Special Tax (Measure C)$1,880,264 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges $4,539,248 Fines and Forfeitures $419,774 Use of Money and Property $30,389 Intergovernmental Revenues $8,857,073 Reimbursements $3,033,843 Miscellaneous $187,702 Subtotal - Revenues $69,290,081 Add: Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF/CARES Act $4,301,409 Add: Operating Transfers In - Measure S $5,944,780 Total Revenues $79,536,270 II.Expenditures City Council $592,662 Community Support $125,000 City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Emergency Management $421,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 Finance $2,600,964 Human Resources $1,160,678 Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 CIP Admin $2,389,172 Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 Police $35,990,469 Fire $10,406,302 Animal Control $450,177 Non-Departmental $1,193,629 Total Expenditures $79,317,557 III.Total Surplus/(Deficit)$218,713 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.00 TABLE A-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Revenues FY 2021 Revised Budget I.Revenues - Included in Analysis A.Taxes and Franchises Property Tax $9,226,610 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Sales Tax (1)$34,931,947 projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development Franchise Fees $3,562,656 projected based on population Special Tax (Measure C)$1,880,264 based on residential units and commercial acreage developed Subtotal - Taxes and Franchises $49,601,477 B.Business Licenses $255,000 projected based on population and employment C.Fines and Forfeitures $419,774 projected based on population and employment D.Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $8,801,658 projected based on increase in gross assessed value Vehicle License Fees $55,415 projected based on population Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenues $8,857,073 E.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax $2,639,716 projected based on population F.Miscellaneous $34,617 projected based on population and employment Total Revenues - Included in Analysis $61,807,657 II.Revenues - Excluded from Analysis A.Transient Occupancy Tax $2,620,575 hotel use not planned as part of Project B.Reimbursements Capital Improvement Program $2,435,827 independent of projected incremental development Pechanga IGA $356,567 independent of projected incremental development Other Reimbursements $333,449 independent of projected incremental development Subtotal - Reimbursements $3,125,843 C.Development Impact Fees $18,000 independent of projected incremental development D.Use of Money and Property Lease/Rental Income $148,089 independent of projected incremental development Investment Interest ($117,700)independent of projected incremental development Other $4,941 Subtotal - Use of Money and Property $35,330 E.Operating Transfers In Measure S Fund $5,944,780 independent of incremental development COPS $279,185 independent of incremental development Fire Station 73 Repayment $0 independent of incremental development CARES Act (State)$1,382,508 independent of incremental development Subtotal - Operating Transfers In $7,606,473 Total Revenues - Excluded from Analysis $13,406,221 III.Charges for Services A.Deducted from Community Development Building $1,671,009 Development Fees $159,780 Planning $542,722 Total Deducted from Community Development $2,373,511 B.Deducted from Public Works Land Development $1,006,805 Public Works $4,750 Parks Maintenance $1,000 Total Deducted from Public Works $1,012,555 C.Deducted from Police $149,557 D.Deducted from Fire $786,769 Total Charges for Services $4,322,392 IV.Total General Fund Revenues $79,536,270 (1)Includes Sales Tax Sharing Agreement. TABLE A-3 Comments Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 16 GENERAL FUND BUDGET SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Net After Expenditures Deduction of FY 2021 Charges for Services Revised Budget (Table A-3) I.Expenditures Included in Analysis City Council $592,662 $0 $592,662 Community Support $125,000 $0 $125,000 General Government City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Human Resources $1,160,678 Emergency Management $421,310 Subtotal General Government $4,886,310 $0 $4,886,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 $0 $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 $0 $961,146 Finance Finance $2,600,964 Animal Control $450,177 Subtotal Finance $3,051,141 $0 $3,051,141 Community Development Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Subtotal Community Development $6,327,008 ($2,373,511) $3,953,497 Public Works Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 Subtotal Public Works $8,075,259 ($1,011,555) $7,063,704 Public Works Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 ($1,000) $4,007,007 Fire $10,406,302 ($786,769) $9,619,533 Non-Departmental Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 Property Tax Administration $94,195 Subtotal Non-Departmental $1,193,629 $0 $1,193,629 Add: Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 Total Expenditures - Included in Analysis $43,937,916 $39,765,081 II.Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis Police (1)$35,990,469 ($149,557) $35,840,912 CIP Administration $2,389,172 $0 $2,389,172 Total Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis $38,379,641 $38,230,084 III.Total General Fund Expenditures $82,317,557 $77,995,165 (1) Per City; police expenditures included in analysis reflect project pro rata share of one new police officer per 1,000 population. TABLE A-4 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 17 APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS RENDEZVOUS 20-Year Projection SUMMARY OF ANNUAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT GENERATED BY PROJECT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2024 $164,000 $170,000 ($6,000)($44)0.96 2 2025 $168,000 $177,000 ($9,000)($69)0.95 3 2026 $172,000 $185,000 ($13,000)($96)0.93 4 2027 $176,000 $193,000 ($17,000)($124)0.91 5 2028 $180,000 $201,000 ($21,000)($154)0.90 6 2029 $185,000 $210,000 ($25,000)($187)0.88 7 2030 $189,000 $219,000 ($30,000)($221)0.86 8 2031 $194,000 $229,000 ($35,000)($258)0.85 9 2032 $199,000 $238,000 ($39,000)($297)0.84 10 2033 $204,000 $249,000 ($45,000)($338)0.82 11 2034 $208,000 $260,000 ($52,000)($383)0.80 12 2035 $214,000 $271,000 ($57,000)($430)0.79 13 2036 $219,000 $283,000 ($64,000)($480)0.77 14 2037 $224,000 $296,000 ($72,000)($533)0.76 15 2038 $230,000 $309,000 ($79,000)($590)0.74 16 2039 $235,000 $322,000 ($87,000)($649)0.73 17 2040 $241,000 $337,000 ($96,000)($712)0.72 18 2041 $247,000 $352,000 ($105,000)($780)0.70 19 2042 $253,000 $367,000 ($114,000)($852)0.69 20 2043 $260,000 $384,000 ($124,000)($928)0.68 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio TABLE B-1 Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed to Date Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 18 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Site Area 7.60 Net Acres II.Density 18 Units/Net Acre III.Unit Mix Apartments 134 Units IV.Parking Type Garages/Carports Spaces 288 Spaces Parking Ratio 2.15 Spaces/Unit TABLE B-2 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 19 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ABSORPTION (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental 134 Units 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 II.Total Cumulative Units 134 Units 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 (1)Assumes construction begins 7/1/22 with an opening date of 1/1/24. TABLE B-3 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 20 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL POPULATION RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Total Resident I.Residential Factor (1)Persons/Unit (2)Population Apartments 134 Units 5.0%2.00 255 Total Population 255 (1)KMA assumption reflecting average vacancy rate, based on typical lender underwriting criteria for residential uses. (2)KMA assumption based on industry standard household size by unit type. TABLE B-4 Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 21 POPULATION ESTIMATES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Factor Per Unit FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental 134 Units 5.0%2.00 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II.Total Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 22 POPULATION ESTIMATES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Vacancy Persons Factor Per Unit I.Apartments - Rental 134 Units 5.0%2.00 II.Total Population TABLE B-5 Total at Build-out 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 23 ESTIMATE OF ASSESSED VALUE (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Assessed Value I.Residential Per Unit Apartments - Rental 134 Units $350,000 (1)Based on a review of sales of multi-family buildings apartment buildings in the City. TABLE B-6 Dwelling Units Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 24 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $54,293,000 $55,378,000 $56,486,000 $57,616,000 $58,768,000 $59,943,000 $61,142,000 $62,365,000 $63,612,000 $64,885,000 II.Total Assessed Value $54,293,000 $55,378,000 $56,486,000 $57,616,000 $58,768,000 $59,943,000 $61,142,000 $62,365,000 $63,612,000 $64,885,000 (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 25 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Assessed Value (1) TABLE B-7 Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build-out and 2.0% per year after Project build-out. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $66,182,000 $67,506,000 $68,856,000 $70,233,000 $71,638,000 $73,071,000 $74,532,000 $76,023,000 $77,543,000 $79,094,000 $66,182,000 $67,506,000 $68,856,000 $70,233,000 $71,638,000 $73,071,000 $74,532,000 $76,023,000 $77,543,000 $79,094,000 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 26 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 II.Total Property Tax Revenues $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 TABLE B-8 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 27 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97% I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Property Tax Revenues TABLE B-8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 28 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 II.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 TABLE B-9 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 29 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN-LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Revenues TABLE B-9 OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 30 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10%1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 II.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 TABLE B-10 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 31 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth)$0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% Turnover Rate (Residential)10% I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues TABLE B-10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 32 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPENDING BY RESIDENTS RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 2021 Apartments - Rental I.Estimate of Household Income Average Rent $2,646 (1) Total Annual Costs $31,752 % of Income Spent on Housing 30% Annual Income Required $106,000 II.Number of Households Total Number of Residential Units 134 Occupancy Rate 95% Total Number of Full-Time Equivalent Households 127 III.Aggregate Household Income $13,494,000 (1)Per Developer. Assumes $2.68 per SF. TABLE B-11 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename i: \Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 33 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 II.Total Sales Tax Revenues $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 34 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Sales Tax Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-12 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 35 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 II.Total Measure S Revenues $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 36 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Taxable Spending by Residents (1)33.5% Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% % Supporting Operations 90.0% Annual Escalation 3.0% I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Measure S Revenues (1)KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. TABLE B-13 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 fornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 37 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs Total Resident Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 111,970 (1)54,313 (2)166,283 129,893 Rendezvous 255 0 255 255 Amount Per City Resident or New Residents/ FY 2021 Service Resident Resident Operating Budget (4)Population Equivalent Equivalents I.Franchise Fees $3,229,600 P $28.84 255 II.Business Licenses $265,700 RE $2.05 255 III.Fines and Forfeitures $724,600 RE $5.58 255 IV.Vehicle License Fees $67,600 P $0.60 255 V.Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $2,215,900 P $19.79 255 VI.Miscellaneous Revenue $249,100 RE $1.92 255 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1)Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) (3)KMA assumption. Assumes that approximately three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4)Based on 3-year historical average (FY 2018 - FY 2020 Actual Revenue received). TABLE B-14 U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002- 2018). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 40 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Population FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Total Residential Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II.Total Resident Equivalents 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$28.84 P $7,691 $7,806 $7,924 $8,042 $8,163 $8,285 $8,410 $8,536 $8,664 $8,794 Business Licenses $2.05 RE $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $702 Fines and Forfeitures $5.58 RE $1,532 $1,570 $1,609 $1,650 $1,691 $1,733 $1,777 $1,821 $1,866 $1,913 Vehicle License Fees $0.60 P $166 $170 $174 $179 $183 $188 $192 $197 $202 $207 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $19.79 P $5,435 $5,570 $5,710 $5,852 $5,999 $6,149 $6,302 $6,460 $6,621 $6,787 Miscellaneous Revenue $1.92 RE $527 $540 $553 $567 $581 $596 $611 $626 $642 $658 IV.Total Other Revenues $15,900 $16,200 $16,600 $16,900 $17,200 $17,600 $17,900 $18,300 $18,700 $19,100 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 38 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Other Annual General Fund Revenues (1) Franchise Fees (2)$28.84 P Business Licenses $2.05 RE Fines and Forfeitures $5.58 RE Vehicle License Fees $0.60 P Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $19.79 P Miscellaneous Revenue $1.92 RE IV.Total Other Revenues (1) (2) TABLE B-15 Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 $8,926 $9,060 $9,196 $9,333 $9,473 $9,616 $9,760 $9,906 $10,055 $10,206 $719 $737 $755 $774 $794 $814 $834 $855 $876 $898 $1,961 $2,010 $2,060 $2,112 $2,164 $2,219 $2,274 $2,331 $2,389 $2,449 $212 $218 $223 $229 $234 $240 $246 $252 $259 $265 $6,957 $7,131 $7,309 $7,492 $7,679 $7,871 $8,068 $8,269 $8,476 $8,688 $674 $691 $708 $726 $744 $763 $782 $801 $821 $842 $19,400 $19,800 $20,300 $20,700 $21,100 $21,500 $22,000 $22,400 $22,900 $23,300 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 39 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Multi-Family EDU Factor 0.75 Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Apartments - Rental $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 II.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 41 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Special Tax (Measure C) Multi-Family EDU Factor 0.75 Special Tax Per EDU (1)$74.44 /Parcel I.Apartments - Rental II.Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue (1)Source: City of Temecula. TABLE B-16 C) REVENUE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 42 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Demographic Profile: Total Population Total Employment Total Population/ Jobs City of Temecula 111,970 (1)54,313 (2)166,283 129,893 Rendezvous 255 0 255 255 Amount Per Net New City Resident or New Residents/"Marginal Cost"Residents/ FY 2021 Escalation Service Population Resident Resident Impact Resident Operating Budget (4)Factor (5)Population Type Equivalent Equivalent Adjustment Equivalent I.Police ---5.00%------$352.36 (6)255 5%242 II.City Council $592,662 2.75%RE 129,893 $4.56 255 40%153 III.Community Support $125,000 2.00%RE 129,893 $0.96 255 80%51 IV.General Government $4,886,310 2.50%RE 129,893 $37.62 255 40%153 V.City Clerk $1,311,452 3.00%RE 129,893 $10.10 255 30%179 VI.City Attorney $961,146 2.00%RE 129,893 $7.40 255 40%153 VII.Finance $3,051,141 2.75%RE 129,893 $23.49 255 30%179 VIII.Community Development $3,953,497 2.75%RE 129,893 $30.44 255 20%204 IX.Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$7,063,704 2.50%RE 129,893 $54.38 255 10%230 X.Public Works - Parks Maintenance $4,007,007 2.50%P 111,970 $35.79 255 10%230 XI.Fire $9,619,533 5.00%RE 129,893 $74.06 255 5%242 XII.Property Tax Administration $94,195 2.00%RE 129,893 $0.73 255 30%179 XIII.Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 3.00%RE 129,893 $7.70 255 90%26 XIV.PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 3.00%RE 129,893 $0.77 255 100%0 XV.Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 2.50%RE 129,893 $23.10 255 0%255 XVI.Total Annual Expenditures $39,765,081 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-4. (5) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (6) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population per the FY 2021 Mid-Year Budget. TABLE B-17 Total Resident Equivalents (3) Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 43 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Pop.FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Total Residential Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II.Total Resident Equivalents 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%---$98,815 $103,756 $108,943 $114,390 $120,110 $126,116 $132,421 $139,042 $145,994 $153,294 City Council $4.56 2.75%40%RE $757 $778 $800 $821 $844 $867 $891 $916 $941 $967 Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE $52 $53 $54 $55 $56 $58 $59 $60 $61 $62 General Government $37.62 2.50%40%RE $6,198 $6,353 $6,512 $6,675 $6,842 $7,013 $7,188 $7,368 $7,552 $7,741 City Clerk $10.10 3.00%30%RE $1,969 $2,028 $2,089 $2,152 $2,216 $2,283 $2,351 $2,422 $2,495 $2,570 City Attorney $7.40 2.00%40%RE $1,201 $1,225 $1,250 $1,275 $1,300 $1,326 $1,353 $1,380 $1,408 $1,436 Finance $23.49 2.75%30%RE $4,548 $4,673 $4,802 $4,934 $5,070 $5,209 $5,352 $5,500 $5,651 $5,806 Community Development $30.44 2.75%20%RE $6,736 $6,921 $7,111 $7,307 $7,508 $7,714 $7,926 $8,144 $8,368 $8,598 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$54.38 2.50%10%RE $13,440 $13,776 $14,120 $14,473 $14,835 $15,206 $15,586 $15,976 $16,375 $16,785 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50%10%P $8,844 $9,066 $9,292 $9,525 $9,763 $10,007 $10,257 $10,513 $10,776 $11,046 Fire $74.06 5.00%5%RE $20,768 $21,807 $22,897 $24,042 $25,244 $26,506 $27,831 $29,223 $30,684 $32,218 Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00%30%RE $137 $140 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $161 $164 Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00%90%RE $215 $221 $228 $234 $241 $249 $256 $264 $272 $280 PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00%100%RE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50%0%RE $6,342 $6,501 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,921 IV.Total Annual Expenditures $170,022 $177,298 $184,904 $192,859 $201,179 $209,882 $218,981 $228,505 $238,465 $248,888 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 44 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service Equivalent Factor (1)Adjustment Pop. I.Total Residential Population II.Total Resident Equivalents III.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2)5.00%5%--- City Council $4.56 2.75%40%RE Community Support $0.96 2.00%80%RE General Government $37.62 2.50%40%RE City Clerk $10.10 3.00%30%RE City Attorney $7.40 2.00%40%RE Finance $23.49 2.75%30%RE Community Development $30.44 2.75%20%RE Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$54.38 2.50%10%RE Public Works - Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50%10%P Fire $74.06 5.00%5%RE Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00%30%RE Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00%90%RE PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00%100%RE Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50%0%RE IV.Total Annual Expenditures (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. TABLE B-18 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 $160,959 $169,007 $177,457 $186,330 $195,647 $205,429 $215,700 $226,485 $237,810 $249,700 $993 $1,021 $1,049 $1,078 $1,107 $1,138 $1,169 $1,201 $1,234 $1,268 $63 $65 $66 $67 $69 $70 $71 $73 $74 $76 $7,934 $8,132 $8,336 $8,544 $8,758 $8,977 $9,201 $9,431 $9,667 $9,909 $2,647 $2,726 $2,808 $2,892 $2,979 $3,068 $3,160 $3,255 $3,353 $3,453 $1,465 $1,494 $1,524 $1,554 $1,585 $1,617 $1,649 $1,682 $1,716 $1,750 $5,966 $6,130 $6,299 $6,472 $6,650 $6,833 $7,021 $7,214 $7,412 $7,616 $8,835 $9,078 $9,327 $9,584 $9,847 $10,118 $10,396 $10,682 $10,976 $11,278 $17,204 $17,634 $18,075 $18,527 $18,990 $19,465 $19,952 $20,451 $20,962 $21,486 $11,322 $11,605 $11,895 $12,192 $12,497 $12,809 $13,130 $13,458 $13,794 $14,139 $33,829 $35,521 $37,297 $39,162 $41,120 $43,176 $45,334 $47,601 $49,981 $52,480 $167 $171 $174 $178 $181 $185 $189 $192 $196 $200 $288 $297 $306 $315 $324 $334 $344 $355 $365 $376 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,119 $8,322 $8,530 $8,743 $8,961 $9,186 $9,415 $9,651 $9,892 $10,139 $259,791 $271,203 $283,143 $295,638 $308,715 $322,405 $336,731 $351,731 $367,432 $383,870 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 45 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 Property Transfer Tax $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 Sales Tax - Resident Spending $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 Measure S $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 Measure C $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 Franchise Fees $7,691 $7,806 $7,924 $8,042 $8,163 $8,285 $8,410 $8,536 $8,664 $8,794 Business Licenses $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $702 Fines and Forfeitures $1,532 $1,570 $1,609 $1,650 $1,691 $1,733 $1,777 $1,821 $1,866 $1,913 Vehicle License Fees $166 $170 $174 $179 $183 $188 $192 $197 $202 $207 Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $5,435 $5,570 $5,710 $5,852 $5,999 $6,149 $6,302 $6,460 $6,621 $6,787 Miscellaneous Revenue $527 $540 $553 $567 $581 $596 $611 $626 $642 $658 Total Revenues $164,165 $167,995 $172,059 $176,254 $180,482 $184,843 $189,337 $193,965 $198,628 $203,530 II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $98,815 $103,756 $108,943 $114,390 $120,110 $126,116 $132,421 $139,042 $145,994 $153,294 City Council $757 $778 $800 $821 $844 $867 $891 $916 $941 $967 Community Support $52 $53 $54 $55 $56 $58 $59 $60 $61 $62 General Government $6,198 $6,353 $6,512 $6,675 $6,842 $7,013 $7,188 $7,368 $7,552 $7,741 City Clerk $1,969 $2,028 $2,089 $2,152 $2,216 $2,283 $2,351 $2,422 $2,495 $2,570 City Attorney $1,201 $1,225 $1,250 $1,275 $1,300 $1,326 $1,353 $1,380 $1,408 $1,436 Finance $4,548 $4,673 $4,802 $4,934 $5,070 $5,209 $5,352 $5,500 $5,651 $5,806 Community Development $6,736 $6,921 $7,111 $7,307 $7,508 $7,714 $7,926 $8,144 $8,368 $8,598 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc.$13,440 $13,776 $14,120 $14,473 $14,835 $15,206 $15,586 $15,976 $16,375 $16,785 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $8,844 $9,066 $9,292 $9,525 $9,763 $10,007 $10,257 $10,513 $10,776 $11,046 Fire $20,768 $21,807 $22,897 $24,042 $25,244 $26,506 $27,831 $29,223 $30,684 $32,218 Property Tax Administration $137 $140 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $161 $164 Retiree Medical Contribution $215 $221 $228 $234 $241 $249 $256 $264 $272 $280 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $6,342 $6,501 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,921 Total Expenditures $170,022 $177,298 $184,904 $192,859 $201,179 $209,882 $218,981 $228,505 $238,465 $248,888 III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit)($5,857)($9,303)($12,845)($16,605)($20,697)($25,039)($29,644)($34,540)($39,837)($45,358) Per Unit Per Year ($44)($69)($96)($124)($154)($187)($221)($258)($297)($338) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 0.97 0.95 0.93 0.91 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.83 0.82 TABLE B-19 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 46 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I.Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In-Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues II.Annual General Fund Expenditures Police City Council Community Support General Government City Clerk City Attorney Finance Community Development Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. Public Works - Parks Maintenance Fire Property Tax Administration Retiree Medical Contribution PERS Replacement Benefit Asset Management Fund Total Expenditures III.Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Per Year Revenues to Expenditure Ratio TABLE B-19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $8,926 $9,060 $9,196 $9,333 $9,473 $9,616 $9,760 $9,906 $10,055 $10,206 $719 $737 $755 $774 $794 $814 $834 $855 $876 $898 $1,961 $2,010 $2,060 $2,112 $2,164 $2,219 $2,274 $2,331 $2,389 $2,449 $212 $218 $223 $229 $234 $240 $246 $252 $259 $265 $6,957 $7,131 $7,309 $7,492 $7,679 $7,871 $8,068 $8,269 $8,476 $8,688 $674 $691 $708 $726 $744 $763 $782 $801 $821 $842 $208,464 $213,640 $218,850 $224,202 $229,691 $235,424 $241,295 $247,208 $253,267 $259,569 $160,959 $169,007 $177,457 $186,330 $195,647 $205,429 $215,700 $226,485 $237,810 $249,700 $993 $1,021 $1,049 $1,078 $1,107 $1,138 $1,169 $1,201 $1,234 $1,268 $63 $65 $66 $67 $69 $70 $71 $73 $74 $76 $7,934 $8,132 $8,336 $8,544 $8,758 $8,977 $9,201 $9,431 $9,667 $9,909 $2,647 $2,726 $2,808 $2,892 $2,979 $3,068 $3,160 $3,255 $3,353 $3,453 $1,465 $1,494 $1,524 $1,554 $1,585 $1,617 $1,649 $1,682 $1,716 $1,750 $5,966 $6,130 $6,299 $6,472 $6,650 $6,833 $7,021 $7,214 $7,412 $7,616 $8,835 $9,078 $9,327 $9,584 $9,847 $10,118 $10,396 $10,682 $10,976 $11,278 $17,204 $17,634 $18,075 $18,527 $18,990 $19,465 $19,952 $20,451 $20,962 $21,486 $11,322 $11,605 $11,895 $12,192 $12,497 $12,809 $13,130 $13,458 $13,794 $14,139 $33,829 $35,521 $37,297 $39,162 $41,120 $43,176 $45,334 $47,601 $49,981 $52,480 $167 $171 $174 $178 $181 $185 $189 $192 $196 $200 $288 $297 $306 $315 $324 $334 $344 $355 $365 $376 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,119 $8,322 $8,530 $8,743 $8,961 $9,186 $9,415 $9,651 $9,892 $10,139 $259,791 $271,203 $283,143 $295,638 $308,715 $322,405 $336,731 $351,731 $367,432 $383,870 ($51,327)($57,563)($64,293)($71,436)($79,024)($86,981)($95,436)($104,523)($114,165)($124,301) ($383)($430)($480)($533)($590)($649)($712)($780)($852)($928) 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 47 _________, 2022 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $2,480.25 for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Negative Declaration. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt [ City of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2021050549 Project Title: Rendezvous Phase II Apartments Project Project Location: Southwest of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and Via Las Colinas, County of Riverside Project Description: The project proposes General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. Project Applicant: Pacific West Development, 32823 Temecula Parkway A, Temecula, CA 92592 Lead Agency: City of Temecula Contact Person: Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on ________, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Date: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Notice of Public Hearing A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the City of Temecula PLANNING COMMISSION to consider the matter described below: CASE NO.: PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, PA20-1326 APPLICANT: Pacific West Development PROPOSAL: General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M) (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village) (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-008, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370- 013); a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.61 acres (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-010, 944- 370-012, 944-370-013); and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370- 005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-008, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370- 013). The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. ENVIRONMENTAL: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study. As a result, a Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. CASE PLANNER: Scott Cooper, (951) 506-5137 PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: July 20, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM The complete agenda packet (including any supplemental materials) will be available for viewing in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula) after 4:00 p.m. the Friday before the Planning Commission Meeting. At that time, the packet may also be accessed on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov and will be available for public review at the respective meeting. Any writing distributed to a majority of the Commission regarding any item on the Agenda, after the posting of the Agenda, will be available for public review in the Main Reception area at the Temecula Civic Center (41000 Main Street, Temecula), 8:00 a.m. – 5:00 p.m. In addition, such material will be made available on the City’s website – TemeculaCA.gov – and will be available for public review at the meeting. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the Planning Commission shall be filed within time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the Planning Commission shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. Questions? Please call the Community Development Department at (951) 694-6400.