Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
08232022 CC Agenda
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the office of the City Clerk (951) 694-6444. Notification 48 hours prior to a meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to that meeting [28 CFR 35.102.35.104 ADA Title 11]. AGENDA TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 23, 2022 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 5:00 PM CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding the acquisition of certain property interests, including certain permanent maintenance and access easements, temporary construction easements with a term of twelve months, covenants for construction of certain permanent improvements, and a conservation easement on four properties described below in connection with the proposed extension of Nicolas Road from its current termination at Calle Girasol easterly to Butterfield Stage Road, Project Number LD20-1114 ("Project"). Negotiators for the City are Patrick Thomas and Ron Moreno. The negotiators for the respective real property interests are set forth below. (i) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 31249 Indian Summer Drive in the City of Temecula (APN 957-090-022). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 83,324 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months, covenant authorizing the construction of certain permanent improvements in portions of that 83,324 square foot area, and an approximate 51,003 square foot conservation easement. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Lam Ngo and Huyen Lam Tran. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. (ii) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 39622 Leifer Road in the City of Temecula (APN 957-090-023). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 31,168 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months, covenant authorizing the construction of certain permanent improvements in portions of that 31,168 square foot area. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Isaac G. Navejar and Isabel L. Navejar, as Co -Trustees of the Navejar Living Trust, U/A dated July 18, 2019. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. (iii) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 31270 Tommy Lane in the City of Temecula (APN 957-150-005). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 31,520 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months and an approximate 26,957 square foot permanent maintenance and access easement. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Jose Leonardo Garcia and Mayerling Alida Monteros-Garcia. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. Page 1 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 (iv) The acquisition of certain property interests from the real property located at 39280 Deputy Road in the City of Temecula (APN 957-090-019). Specifically, the City seeks to acquire an approximate 29,630 square foot temporary construction easement with a term of 12 months, covenant authorizing the construction of certain permanent improvements in portions of that 29,630 square foot area, an approximate 16,956 square foot permanent maintenance and access easement, and a public utility easement. The negotiating parties are the City of Temecula and the property owners Sohan Singh and Kuldip Kaur Singh. Under negotiations are price and terms of the acquisition of these property interests. CALL TO ORDER: Mayor Matt Rahn INVOCATION: Pastor Rick Malec of Temecula Methodist Church FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS - NONE BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Planning Commission and Race, Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT Riverside County Sheriffs Department PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Reports by the members of the City Council on matters not on the agenda will be made at this time. A total, not to exceed, ten minutes will be devoted to these reports. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the City Council request Page 2 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the City Council on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 1. Approve Action Minutes of August 9, 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of August 9, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes 2. Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Attachments: Agenda Report 3. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: Attachments That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Agenda Report Resolution List of Demands 4. Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2022 and May 31, 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2022 and May 31, 2022. Attachments: Agenda Report April Treasurer's Report May Treasurer's Report 5. Amend the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2023-27 for Various Projects Recommendation: That the City Council: Page 3 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 6. 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023-27 FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS 2. Approve an appropriation and corresponding fund transfer of $251,940 from Measure S for the projects noted below, including the cancellation of the Utility Undergrounding project; and 3. Approve an appropriation and corresponding reimbursement revenue of $53,500 from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Project 735 - Murrieta Creek Improvements; and 4. Approve an appropriation and corresponding reimbursement revenue of $282,000 from Municipal Water District for Project 130 - Parks Improvement Program; and 5. Approve an appropriation and corresponding fund transfer of $630,894 from CDBG-CV2 to establish a new project for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area. Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Amended CIP Budget Sheets CIP Budget Amendment Summary Adopt Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of the Annual Inspection Report Pursuant to SB 1205 Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE MARSHAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE SB 1205 STATE MANDATED ANNUAL INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13145, 13146 AND 17921 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE Attachments: Agenda Report RPcnlntinn Page 4 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 7. Approve Resolution Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and Prospective Issuance of Special Tax Bonds Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT - TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement 8. Approve Applications for Hijzhway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 Funding Through the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance for Various Citywide Traffic Safety Improvement Projects Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING THE APPLICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) CYCLE 11 FUNDS THROUGH THE CALTRANS, LOCAL ASSISTANCE FOR VARIOUS CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND ACCEPTING THE TERMS OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT Attachments: Agenda Report Racnlntinn 9. Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the I-15/17rench Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II, PW 16-01 Recommendation Attachments That the City Council approve an agreement for consultant services with T.Y. Lin International, in an amount not to exceed $350,000, to provide engineering and construction support during construction of the I-I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements - Phase II, PW16-01 Project. Agenda Report Agreement Project Description Page 5 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 10. 11. 12. 13. Approve Amendment to the Agreement with MDG Associates, Inc., for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Administration Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the first amendment to the agreement with MDG Associates, Inc., in the amount of $161,200, for a total agreement amount of $403,000, for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Administration Services. Attachments: Agenda Report Amendment Annrove Second Amendment to the Agreement with STC Traffic. Inc. for On -Call Traffic Engineering Services Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement with STC Traffic, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, for additional on -call traffic engineering services. Attachments: Agenda Report Second Amendment Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Solicitation of Construction Bids for Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project, PW21-04 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project, PW21-04; and 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. Attachments: Agenda Report Project Description Project Locations Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW11-10 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW11-10, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the Page 6 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 14. 15. amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Maintenance Bond Contractor's Affidavit & Final Release Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Accept the Improvements for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Contractors Affidavit Final Release Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05 Recommendation That the City Council: 1. Accept the Improvements for the Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. Attachments: Agenda Report Notice of Completion Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release Page 7 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 16. Receive and File Temporary Street Closures for 2022 Autumnfest Events Recommendation: That the City Council receive and file the temporary closure of certain streets for the following 2022 Autumnfest events: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FAIR ART & STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR/OPEN STREETS GREEK FESTIVAL HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL VETERAN'S DAY Attachments: Agenda Report Exhibit A Fxhihit R RECESS CITY COUNCIL MEETING TO SCHEDULED MEETINGS OF THE TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY, AND/OR THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 8 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING CALL TO ORDER: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CSD CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Community Services District request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 17. Approve Action Minutes of August 9, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of August 9, 2022. Attachments: Action Minutes CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS Page 9 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 CSD ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Community Services District will be held on Tuesday, September 13, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 10 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE TEMECULA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY - NO MEETING TEMECULA HOUSING AUTHORITY - NO MEETING TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY CALL TO ORDER: Chair Matt Rahn ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart TPFA PUBLIC COMMENT A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on matters not listed on the agenda. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. TPFA CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and all will be enacted by one roll call vote. There will be no discussion of these items unless members of the Temecula Public Financing Authority request specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. A total of 30 minutes is provided for members of the public to address the Board of Directors on items that appear on the Consent Calendar. Each speaker is limited to 3 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Speaker cards for in -person comments will be called in the order received by the City Clerk and then, if time remains, email comments will be read. Email comments on all matters must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 18. Approve Resolutions Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and Prospective Issuance of Special Tax Bonds Recommendation: That the Board of Directors adopt resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY Page 11 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO AND THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO RESOLUTION NO. TPFA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution - Receipt of Deposit and Issuance of Bonds Resolution - Intention to Annex Territory Proposed Annexation No. 1 Boundary Map Petition Including Waivers) Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement TPFA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT TPFA BOARD OF DIRECTOR REPORTS TPFA ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Temecula Public Financing Authority will be held on Tuesday, September 13, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Page 12 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before a public hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or in opposition to the approval of a project at the time of the hearing. If you challenge a project in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing. For public hearings each speaker is limited to 5 minutes. Public comments may be made in person at the meeting by submitting a speaker card to the City Clerk or by submitting an email to be read aloud into the record at the meeting. Email comments must be submitted to CouncilComments@temeculaca.gov. Email comments on all matters, including those not on the agenda, must be received prior to the time the item is called for public comments. At public hearings involving land use matters, the property owner and/or applicant has the burden of proof and, therefore, shall be allowed 15 minutes for an initial presentation, and an additional 10 minutes for rebuttal by its development team following other comments on the matter. An appellant, other than the property owner and/or applicant, and the spokesperson for an organized group of residents residing within the noticed area of the property, which is the subject of the public hearing, shall be allowed 15 minutes to present the appellant's position to the Council. The Mayor may allow more time if required to provide due process for the property owner, applicant or appellant. All other members of the public may speak during the public hearing for a maximum period of 5 minutes each. Deferral of one speaker's time to another is not permitted. In the event of a large number of speakers, the Mayor may reduce the maximum time limit for members of the public to speak. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. 19. Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibili . Act (TEFRA) Hearing, Adopt a Resolution Approving the Issuance of Not to Exceed $27,000,000 of California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Linfield Christian School Recommendation That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the issuance by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") of not to exceed $27,000,000 of the Authority's Revenue Obligations (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Linfield Christian School, a California nonprofit religious corporation (the "Borrower"); and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of educational facilities for the benefit of the Borrower. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED Page 13 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 $27,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING AND FURNISHING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED Attachments: Agenda Report Resolution Resolution No. 19-45 Notice of Public Hearing 20. Consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) Recommendation: That the City Council conduct a public hearing and approve the project including a General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) and adopt related resolutions and introduce ordinance: RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323) ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Page 14 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325) RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326) Page 15 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 Attachments: Agenda Report Aerial Map Resolution - Adopting Negative Declaration Exhibit A - Final Negative Declaration with Appendices Resolution - General Plan Amendment Exhibit A — Amended General Plan Land Use Map Ordinance — Planned Development Overlay Amendment Exhibit A — Planned Development Overlay Amendment Resolution — Development Plan Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval Resolution — Tentative Tract Map Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval PC Resolution No. 2022-19 - Negative Declaration PC Resolution No. 2022-20 - General Plan Amendment PC Resolution No. 2022-21 - Overlav Amendment PC Resolution No. 2022-22 - Development Plan PC Resolution No. 2022-23 - Tentative Tract Man Plan Reductions - Development Plan Plan Reductions - Tentative Tract Ma Fiscal Impact Analysis Public Correspondence Notice of Determination Notice of Public Hearing DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 21. Communi . Development Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report PlanningActivity Report 22. Fire Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Fire Department Report 23. Public Works Department Monthly Report Attachments: Agenda Report Project Status Report ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS Any Council Member, including the Mayor, may request an item be placed on a future agenda. Any such request will be discussed under this section. In making the request, a Council Member may briefly Page 16 City Council Agenda August 23, 2022 describe the topic of the proposed agenda item and any timing associated with the placement of the item on the agenda. This description shall not exceed 3 minutes unless extended by a majority vote of the City Council. No substantive discussion on the subject of the motion may occur. General discussion amongst the City Council on items listed under this section of the agenda shall be limited to 15 minutes. Items may only be placed on the agenda by Council Members pursuant to policy or by the City Manager based on administrative or operational needs of the City. Public comments on the placement of these agenda items shall be limited to a maximum of 30 minutes. Individual comments shall not exceed 3 minutes. All public participation is governed by the Council Policy regarding Public Participation at Meetings and Agenda Placements by Council Members adopted by Resolution No. 2021-54. CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on Tuesday, September 13, 2022, at 4:30 p.m., for a Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 p.m., at the Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. NOTICE TO THE PUBLIC The full agenda packet (including staff reports, public closed session information, and any supplemental material available after the original posting of the agenda), distributed to a majority of the City Council regarding any item on the agenda, will be available for public viewing in the main reception area of the Temecula Civic Center during normal business hours at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. The material will also be available on the City's website at TemeculaCa.gov. and available for review at the respective meeting. If you have questions regarding any item on the agenda, please contact the City Clerk's Department at (951) 694-6444. Page 17 Item No. 1 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL REGULAR MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 9, 2022 - 6:00 PM CLOSED SESSION - 4:30 PM CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — INITIATION OF LITIGATION. The City Council will meet in closed session with the City Attorney pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(d)(4) with respect to three matters of potential litigation. A point has been reached where, in the opinion of the City Attorney, based on existing facts and circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation involving the City and the City Council will decide whether to initiate litigation. CALL TO ORDER at 6:00 PM: Mayor Matt Rahn INVOCATION: Pastor Dan Cole of Hope Lutheran Church FLAG SALUTE: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart PRESENTATIONS - NONE BOARD / COMMISSION REPORTS Community Services Commission and Public/Traffic Safety Commission PUBLIC SAFETY REPORT California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection PUBLIC COMMENTS - NON -AGENDA ITEMS The following individual(s) addressed the City Council: • Maria Baldovinos • Bob Kowell • Craig Evans CITY COUNCIL REPORTS CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 1. Approve Action Minutes of July 26, 2022 and August 2, 2022 2. 3. 4 Wi r Recommendation: That the City Council approve the action minutes of July 26, 2022 and August 2, 2022. Waive Readiniz of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions Recommendation: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. Approve List of Demands Recommendation: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-59 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A Approve City Treasurer's Report as of December 30, 2021, January 31, 2022, February 28, 2022, and March 31, 2022 Recommendation: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of December 30, 2021, January 31, 2022, February 28, 2022, and March 31, 2022. Receive Report Regarding Status of Upcoming Vacancies on Commissions Recommendation: That the City Council receive the report regarding the status of upcoming vacancies on Commissions. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Edwards, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. Adopt Resolutions Supporting Proposition 26 and Opposing Proposition 27 (At the Request of Mayor Rahn and Council Member Edwards) Recommendation: That the City Council adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022-60 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA SUPPORTING PROPOSITION 26 RESOLUTION NO. 2022-61 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA OPPOSING PROPOSITION 27 2 7. 8. 9. Approved the Staff Recommendation (4-1): Motion by Schwank, Second by Edwards. The vote reflected unanimous approval with Alexander opposing. Approve License Agreement Between City of Temecula and Friends of the Temecula Libraries for Use of City Real Property Recommendation: That the City Council approve the license agreement between the City of Temecula and the Friends of the Temecula Libraries for use of City real property. Award Construction Contract to DBX, Inc. for the Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive. PW19-19 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Award a construction contract to DBX, Inc. in the amount of $448,045, for the Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19; and 2. Approve construction contract change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $44,804.50, which is equal to 10% of the Contract amount; and 3. Make a finding that the Traffic Signal Installation - Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 is exempt from Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) fees. Approve First Amendment to Agreement with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. for the Cherry Street Extension and Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing Project, PW19-15 Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Approve the first amendment to the agreement with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, for additional contingency in support of the professional design and environmental services of the Cherry Street Extension and Murrieta Creek Low -Flow Crossing Project, PW19-15; and 2. Increase the City Manager's authority to approve extra work authorizations by the same amount. 10. Approve Tract Map 38018 (Located on Sommers Bend between Sports Ranch k Sommers Bend to the West, Sommers Place, a Private Recreational Center, to the East and Long Valley Wash to the South Recommendation: 1. Approve Tract Map 38018 in conformance with the conditions of approval; and 2. Approve the subdivision monumentation agreement with the developer; and 3. Authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements on behalf of the City. 11. Approve Parcel Map 38189 (Located on the Southwest Corner of Wolf Store Road and Butterfield Stage Road) Recommendation: That the City Council approve Parcel Map 38189 in conformance with the conditions of approval. 12. Approve Second Amendment to Right of End Agreement with Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority on City -Owned Properties within Temecula Creek Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the right of entry agreement with the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority on city -owned properties within Temecula Creek. 13. Approve Second Amendment to the Minor Maintenance Agreement for Homeless Encampment Cleanup Services with Singhp, Inc. Recommendation: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the minor maintenance agreement for homeless encampment cleanup services with Singh Group, Inc., to extend the term to June 30, 2025, and increase payment in the amount of $300,000, for a total agreement amount of $500,000. RECESS: At 6:35 PM, the City Council recessed and convened as the Temecula Community Services District Meeting and the Temecula Public Financing Authority Meeting. At 6:40 PM the City Council resumed with the remainder of the City Council Agenda. RECONVENE TEMECULA CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING 16. Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act TEFRA Hearing and Adopt Resolution Approving the Issuance of Not to Exceed $36,000,000 of California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Rancho Community Reformed Church Recommendation: That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the issuance by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") of not to exceed $36,000,000 of the Authority's Revenue Obligations (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Rancho Community Reformed Church, a California nonprofit public benefit corporation (the "Borrower"); and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of educational facilities for the benefit of the Borrower. RESOLUTION NO. 2022-62 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $36,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY'S REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING AND FURNISHING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF RANCHO COMMUNITY REFORMED CHURCH AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Schwank, Second by Stewart. The vote reflected unanimous approval. ITEMS FOR FUTURE CITY COUNCIL AGENDAS CITY MANAGER REPORT CITY ATTORNEY REPORT The City Attorney stated there was no reportable actions from closed session. ADJOURNMENT At 6:45 PM, the City Council meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 23, 2022, at 4:30 PM for Closed Session, with regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] 5 Item No. 2 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Waive Reading of Standard Ordinances and Resolutions PREPARED BY: Randi Johl, Director of Legislative Affairs/City Clerk RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council waive the reading of the text of all standard ordinances and resolutions included in the agenda except as specifically required by the Government Code. BACKGROUND: The City of Temecula is a general law city formed under the laws of the State of California. With respect to adoption of ordinances and resolutions, the City adheres to the requirements set forth in the Government Code. Unless otherwise required, the full reading of the text of standard ordinances and resolutions is waived. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: None Item No. 3 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve the List of Demands PREPARED BY: Pam Espinoza, Accounting Technician II RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A BACKGROUND: All claims and demands are reported and summarized for review and approval by the City Council on a routine basis at each City Council meeting. The attached claims represent the paid claims and demands since the last City Council meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: All claims and demands were paid from appropriated funds or authorized resources of the City and have been recorded in accordance with the City's policies and procedures. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. List of Demands RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ALLOWING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEMANDS AS SET FORTH IN EXHIBIT A THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the following claims and demands as set forth in Exhibit A, on file in the office of the City Clerk, has been reviewed by the City Manager's Office and that the same are hereby allowed in the amount of $ 8,512,474.71. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 07/26/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: $ 594,843.15 07/28/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 1,091,122.09 08/02/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 832,205.49 08/04/2022 TOTAL CHECK RUN: 5,194,065.70 08/04/2022 TOTAL PAYROLL RUN: 800,238.28 TOTAL LIST OF DEMANDS FOR 8/23/2022 COUNCIL MEETING: $ 8,512,474.71 DISBURSEMENTS BY FUND: CHECKS: CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND $ 4,868,343.40 110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 1,090.55 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 23,130.61 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 68,070.12 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 15,645.07 170 MEASURE A FUND 100.00 190 COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 654,569.17 191 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL A 87.42 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 3,279.60 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 24,842.65 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 66,040.93 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJ FUND 946,975.17 300 INSURANCE FUND 178,978.30 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 6,632.94 320 INFORMATION SYSTEMS 335,994.51 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 31,886.98 340 FACILITIES 86,144.47 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND 4,138.02 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 295,000.00 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTONA&B DEBT SERVICE 1,680.06 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,680.06 475 CFD03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,292.97 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,680.06 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,683.89 478 CFD 16-01 RORIPAUGH PHASE II 1,682.04 479 CFD 19-01 CYPRESS RIDGE 1,147.50 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 5,926.74 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 1,611.75 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLAND 1,087.74 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 91.18 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 1,360.06 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 517.07 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 733.85 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 4,251.36 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 127.10 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 381.21 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 98.12 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 2,674.96 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP. 994.33 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 614.40 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATE 133.93 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 313.78 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 58.27 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 1,600.32 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 1,435.52 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 4,728.03 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 6,170.22 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 181.57 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 145.68 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 14,572.48 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 1,074.91 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 77.72 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 725.78 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 12,752.17 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 116.69 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE GASB 45 24,883.00 $ 7,712,236.43 CITY OF TEMECULA LIST OF DEMANDS 001 GENERAL FUND 110 RANCHO CALIF ROAD REIMB DIST 140 COMMUNITY DEV BLOCK GRANT 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL D REFUSE RECYCLING 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 300 INSURANCE FUND 305 WORKERS' COMPENSATION 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 330 SUPPORT SERVICES 340 FACILITIES 700 CERBT CALIFORNIA EE RETIREE-GASB45 TOTAL BY FUND: 369,622.35 1,177.85 642.88 4,162.24 287,351.47 1,574.48 197.13 4,216.74 3,375.85 3,375.99 40,157.93 5,258.69 8,448.40 70,676.28 800,238.28 $ 8,512,474.71 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/26/2022 4:10:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209600 7/26/2022 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 209601 7/26/2022 008765 SAN DIEGO AIR & SPACE MUSEUM Description Amount Paid Check Total SUMMER FOOD SVC PRGM: TCSD 1,001.29 SUPPLIES: FOOD SVC PRGM: TCSD 550.29 1,551.58 SUMMER DAY CAMP EXCURSION: CRC 240.00 240.00 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,791.58 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/26/2022 4:10:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA 2 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,791.58 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 502747 7/28/2022 022546 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, ANTENNA SPEAKER MICS: EOC ENTERPRISES 502748 7/28/2022 013015 ALWAYS RELIABLE BACKFLOW REPAIR: FRIENDSHIP BACKFLOW, AKA NANETTE PARK: PW SEMAN BACKFLOW TESTING: PARKS: PW 502749 7/28/2022 005037 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH RETENTION REL: SLURRY SEAL PRGM INC 502750 7/28/2022 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: AQUATICS JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: SPORT; JUL WATER SVCS: TEM SHERIFF JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: MPSC JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: PW JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TCC JUL DRINKING WATER SVCS: INFO TECF JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: TVM JUILY DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: LIBRA JUL DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: FOC 502751 7/28/2022 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC JUN MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS: PW 502752 7/28/2022 022518 BRIGHTON HILL ACADEMY SLC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS DBA, THE FIRST TEE OF THE I.E. 502753 7/28/2022 022670 BROWN, JAMAL DEON, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS JDB TRAINING 502754 7/28/2022 018059 CIVICPLUS LLC REC MGMT SOFTWARE RENEW: TCSD 502755 7/28/2022 004412 COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CTC TENNIS AKA KERRY LE 502756 7/28/2022 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: FACILITIES APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: COI 502757 7/28/2022 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING SVCS: PARKS: PW HVAC INC PLUMBING SVCS: PARKS: PW PLUMBING SVCS: BIRDSALL PARK: PW PLUMBING SVCS: FOC 502758 7/28/2022 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL TEMP RESTROOM SVCS: TES POOL SRVCS RENOVATION PORTABLE RESTROOM SVCS: TEM SHE Amount Paid Check Total 836.14 836.14 1,490.25 189.00 1,679.25 80,802.47 80,802.47 68.96 68.96 62.53 34.75 29.09 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 28.28 405.69 9,098.22 9,098.22 1,176.00 1,176.00 3,234.00 3,234.00 30,667.94 30,667.94 3,150.00 3,150.00 5,955.00 211.42 6,166.42 792.00 608.11 235.00 227.00 1,862.11 325.76 133.21 458.97 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 502759 7/28/2022 019720 DIVERSIFIED WATERSCAPES JUN WTR QUALITY MAINT: DUCK INC POND/HARVEST 502760 7/28/2022 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARKS: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS: P\ FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREETS: P1 FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: STREET MAI FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TRAFFIC: PVN FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: CIP: PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: LAND DEV: F 502761 7/28/2022 018098 ELITE CLAIMS MANAGEMENT JUN '22 3RD PARTY CLAIM ADMIN: WC INC 502762 7/28/2022 019530 EMPIRE ENGRAVING Recognition awards: Tern Sheriff 502763 7/28/2022 010804 FEHR AND PEERS TRANSP DISCOVERY/BENCHMARKING: PLAN 502764 7/28/2022 009475 GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY, TABLETS & PRINTERS FOR TRAFFIC: INC, DBA: GST TEM SHER 502765 7/28/2022 015534 GOVERNMENT JOBS.COM INC, USER LICENSE NEOGOV RENEWAL: DBA NEOGOV HR 502766 7/28/2022 020628 HASA INC POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI POOLS POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI PO POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI PO POOL SANITIZING CHEMICALS: VARI PO 502767 7/28/2022 006250 HAZ MAT TRANS INC HAZMAT DISPOSAL: STREET MAINT: PW 502768 7/28/2022 001135 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR GROUP INC, DBA: FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR 502769 7/28/2022 012285 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY MISC SUPPLIES: FOC 502770 7/28/2022 022664 MARIPOSATREE EMERGENCY SLOPE TREE TRIM: MANAGEMENT INC PARKS Amount Paid Check Total 7,213.00 7,213.00 2,197.36 2,063.23 1,415.75 1,359.60 645.57 281.33 184.70 90.38 8,237.92 1,250.00 1,250.00 152.25 152.25 1,798.13 1,798.13 2,018.37 2,018.37 55,989.62 55,989.62 1,064.01 1,042.74 921.48 692.04 3,720.27 2,265.24 2,265.24 932.00 280.00 100.00 1,312.00 563.40 563.40 4,128.00 4,128.00 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 502771 7/28/2022 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC 502772 7/28/2022 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY INC 502773 7/28/2022 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS 502774 7/28/2022 002925 NAPAAUTO PARTS 502775 7/28/2022 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC 502776 7/28/2022 009337 NV5INC (Continued) Description JUN CDBG PRGM ADMIN: PLANNING MAY CDBG PRGM ADMIN: PLANNING JUN LABOR COMPLIANCE SVCS: PW20-' MAY CDBG-CV EMERG RENT ASSIST PG MAY CDBG-CV EMER MORTG ASSIST LED PARKING LOT FIXTURES: TVE2 MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: FOC MISC ELECTRICAL SUUPPLIES: THEATR ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATER: PW TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS MISC AUTO PARTS: STREET MAINT: PW MISC AUTO PARTS: STREET MAINT: PW MISC AUTO PARTS: STREET MAINT: PW JUN LNDSCP MAINT:SPORTS PARKS: PW JUN LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/TRAILS: PW JUN LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/MEDIANS JUNE LANDSCAPE MAINT: FACILITIES JUN LNDSCP MAINT: INTERCHANGE: PV\ MAY PROJ MGT SVCS: MRC, PW17-21 502777 7/28/2022 021121 OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH CTR MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR OF CA, DBA CONCENTRA MEDICAL CTR 502778 7/28/2022 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE CITY VEHICLE MAINT SVCS: PD INC VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW VEHICLE REPAIRS: STREET MAINT: PW 502779 7/28/2022 022537 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CHILDRENS DISTRIBUTOR MUSEUM MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: CIVIC CTR MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: TCC MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: TVE2 502780 7/28/2022 020429 REMOTE SATELLITE SYSTEMS JUNE'22 SAT PH AIRTIME/AUG FEE: I NTL EOC 502781 7/28/2022 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES GERSHON MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES Amount Paid Check Total 5,671.50 5,021.00 300.00 275.00 100.00 10,652.85 492.64 342.89 113.64 4,725.00 91.31 30.43 28.18 74,954.54 56,004.00 20,230.00 10,150.00 6,977.00 28,136.25 87.00 524.17 363.05 151.51 672.27 449.55 380.53 114.91 295.00 26.00 3,792.52 2,557.61 609.00 377.00 11,367.50 11, 602.02 4,725.00 149.92 168,315.54 28,136.25 87.00 1,038.73 1,617.26 295.00 7,362.13 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 502782 7/28/2022 004274 SAFE AND SECURE LOCKSMITH SRVC 502783 7/28/2022 009213 SHERRY BERRY MUSIC 502784 7/28/2022 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW 502785 7/28/2022 013482 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES INC, DBA BAS SECURITY 502786 7/28/2022 022051 SINGH GROUP INC 502787 7/28/2022 000645 SMARTAND FINAL INC 502788 7/28/2022 001546 STRAIGHT LINE GLASS AND MIRROR, COMPANY INC 502789 7/28/2022 009452 EMPLOYEE #00427 502790 7/28/2022 021361 TELECOM LAW FIRM PC 502791 7/28/2022 000668 TIMMY D PRODUCTIONS INC 502792 7/28/2022 021603 TITAN RENTALS GROUP INC, TITAN TENT & EVENT RENTAL 502793 7/28/2022 011351 TRITECH SOFTWARE SYSTEMS 502794 7/28/2022 009101 VISION ONE INC, DBA ACCESSO 502795 7/28/2022 018147 WADDLETON, JEFFREY L 502796 7/28/2022 016864 EMPLOYEE #00492 (Continued) Description LOCKSMITH SVCS: CIVIC CENTER: PW LOCKSMITH SVCS: FACILITIES: PW JAZZ @ THE MERC 7/14 SIGN POSTING SVCS: FACILITIES: PW SECURITY: JULY 4TH SHOW:TCSD SECURITY - VARIOUS: TCSD SECURITY AT SPECIAL EVENTS:TCSD HOMELESS ENCAMPMNET CLEAN-UP HOMELESS ENCAMPMENT CLEAN-UP: F MISC SUPPLIES: SFSP: HUMAN SVCS: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: EVENTS: MPSC/ HUMAI REPLACE SECURITY GLASS: CIVIC CENTER REPLACE WINDOW GLASS: LIBRARY: P� REIMB:SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THEATER REIMB: SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THE REIMB: SUPPLIES FOR COMMUNITY THE Legal srvcs:Planning DJ/SOUND SETUP: SPEC EVENTS: TCSD High Hopes/SKIP Movie Night: TCSD:Hum� DJ/SOUND SETUP: 7/4 PARADE: TCSD ART OFF THE WALLS: TVM: TCSD RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD RENTALS: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCSD ASSET MGMT OF SFTWR: INFO TECH JUN SHOWARE TICKETING SVCS: THEATER MC SKATE PARK SVCS: CRC: TCSD UNIFORM REIMB: BLDG & SAFETY Amount Paid Check Total 143.82 29.25 483.00 2,430.21 8,086.35 1,837.00 286.00 6,035.00 3,626.00 283.75 283.65 25,797.24 3,106.25 290.36 84.12 67.41 351.00 40,077.00 1,600.00 1,000.00 700.00 4,087.69 2,714.77 378.00 23,972.94 1.744.00 525.00 150.00 173.07 483.00 2,430.21 10,209.35 9,661.00 567.40 28,903.49 441.89 351.00 43,377.00 7,180.46 23,972.94 1.744.00 525.00 150.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 593,051.57 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/26/2022 3:26:59PM CITY OF TEMECULA 50 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 593,051.57 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 13592 6/9/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 022995 NATIONAL CERT ASSOCIATION 010724 TOWN & COUNTRY RESORT HOTEL, DBA: ATLAS HOTELS 13679 6/30/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 022985 RITA'S OF MURRIETA 017201 STATEFOODSAFETY.COM 014804 WEBSTAURANT STORE, THE 006952 PAYPAL 021896 JP HANDMADE CORP, DBA MINUTEMAN PRESS 001264 COSTCO TEMECULA 491 014229 BOXFORLESS.COM 020964 SPS MANAGEMENT, DBA ROCK FITNESS 010364 REGAL ENTERTAINMENT GROUP 011114 VERBANIC, CARL, DBACARL'S HAWAIIAN SHAVE 020395 ETSY 000152 CALIF PARKS AND RECREATION SOC, C P R S 017201 STATEFOODSAFETY.COM 012085 ISTOCK INT'L INC. 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 017201 STATEFOODSAFETY.COM 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE LLC, DBA CORNER BAKERY CAFE 022954 STAYBRIDGE SUITES 000152 CALIF PARKS AND RECREATION SOC, C P R S 020249 LAUND3R.COM LLC Description Amount Paid Check Total MEMBERSHIP DUES: EOC 220.00 LODGING: CESA CONF: EOC 669.61 RFRSHMNTS: CREEK WALK RIBBON 550.00 CUTTING FOOD HANDLER VOUCHERS: CRC 513.00 STAFF SUPPLIES: KITCHEN: MPSC 482.52 VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 449.10 TRANSACTION BUSINESS CARDS: TCSD 56.19 SUPPLIES: SUMMER DAY CAMP: TCSD 939.86 CARDBOARD: BOAT REGATTA: TCSD 834.95 EXCURSION: SUMMER CAMP: TCSD 675.00 EXCURSION: SUMMER CAMP: TCSD 2,813.45 RFRSHMNTS: PUBLIC WORKS 1,575.00 RFRSHMNTS: MOROCCO EVENT: TVM 205.47 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: TCSD 180.00 FOOD SAFETY MGR CERTIFICATE: 130.00 TCSD SUBSCRIPTION: PROMO IMAGES: 120.00 TCSD HEALTH PERMITS: SPEC EVENT: TCSD 436.00 FOOD HANDLER VOUCHERS: TCSD 405.00 HEALTH PERMITS: SPEC EVENT: TCSD 319.00 RFRSHMNTS: CULTUREFEST EVENT: 305.12 TCSD LODGING: MUSEUM ASSESSORS: 267.02 TCSD MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: TCSD 165.00 LAUNDRY SVCS: TABLE CLOTHS: 163.80 TCSD 889.61 Page:1 apChkLst 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 2 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 022785 VERO'S MEXICAN & SEA FOOD RFRSHMNTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER 83.64 020249 LAUND3R.COM LLC LAUNDRY SVCS: TABLE CLOTHS: 56.25 TCSD 017443 OPERATING CO.LLC RFRSHMNTS: HOSPITALITY: THEATER 73.60 MED.CUISINE, DBA: DAPHNE'S CALIFORNIA 020249 LAUND3R.COM LLC LAUNDRY SVC: SAFETY VEST: TCSD 38.45 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: TCSD 18.00 COMPANY INC 020792 CANVA.COM MONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION: TCSD 12.99 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, HEALTH PERMITS: SPEC EVENT: TCSD 10.33 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 020886 NETFLIX.COM MONTHLY SVC CHARGE: TEEN ROOM: 9.99 CRC 010885 BIRCH AQUARIUM AT SCRIPPS EXCURSION TICKETS: SKIP: TCSD -148.65 INST, OF OCEANOGRAPHY/UC S.D. 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, HEALTH PERMITS: SPEC EVENT. TCSD 7.56 11,747.64 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH DEPT 13680 7/15/2022 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VAR JUN WATER 3015553 DEER 72,097.21 72,097.21 DISTRICT HOLLOW WAY 13684 7/25/2022 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VAR JUN WATER 3003793 28250 YNEZ 27,368.25 27,368.25 DISTRICT RD 13685 6/29/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' GASB REPORTING SVCS: FINANCE 2,250.00 2,250.00 RETIREMENT) 13687 4/26/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 384.58 384.58 RETIREMENT) 13796 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 006952 PAYPAL VERISIGN PAYFLOW PRO 25.00 25.00 TRANSACTION: FIN 13797 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 019953 CAESARS ENTERTAINMENT PARKING: ICSC CONF: CITY COUNCIL 36.00 36.00 CORP. DBA PARIS HOTEL Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 13798 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 022997 BELL TRANSPORTATION SHUTTLE SVCS: ICSC CONF: CITY CNCL 022998 SHAKE SHACK RFRSHMNTS: ICSC CONF: CITY CNCL 021390 ONTARIO AIRPORT RFRSHMNTS: ICSC CONF: CITY COUNCIL 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING PARKING: ICSC CONF: CITY CNCL LOT 13805 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 013338 APPLE STORE IPAD PRO REPLACEMENT: HR 13808 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 018925 MEMORABLE BITES LLC, DBA RFRSHMNTS: CULTUREFEST: FIRE FIREHOUSE SUBS DEPT 007102 RENAISSANCE HOTELS LODGING: CFED CONF: FIRE DEPT 023001 AMPED OFF ROAD HELMETS: MEDIC CARTS: FIRE DEPT 018925 MEMORABLE BITES LLC, DBA RFRSHMNTS: CULTUREFEST: FIRE FIREHOUSE SUBS DEPT 013338 APPLE STORE APPLICATION RENEWAL: CANVA: FIRE 013338 APPLE STORE ADD'L PHONE STORAGE: FIRE DEPT 007102 RENAISSANCE HOTELS LODGING: CFED CONF: FIRE DEPT 13809 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 020812 INSTACART.COM SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: HR 017300 ADOBE.COM SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: HR 015421 SURVEYMONKEYCOM SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: HR 015421 SURVEYMONKEY.COM SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL: HR 020953 LYFT TRANSPORTATION: TYLER CONF'22: HR 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING PARKING: TYLER CONF'22: HR LOT 006942 ONTARIO AIRPORT PARKING PARKING: TYLER CONF'22: HR LOT 022975 RIVAL COFFEE RFRSHMNTS: BIKE TO WORK DAY 020953 LYFT TRANSPORTATION: TYLER CONF'22: HR 022978 CIA MEDICAL EZ GLIDE COVER STORAGE: TEM SAFE 022973 UNIVERSAL MEDICAL INC WALL BRACKETS & CHAIR: EOC Amount Paid Check Total 30.75 18.25 13.99 54.00 116.99 1,328.16 1,328.16 1,124.59 907.16 259.98 301.51 119.99 0.99 0.04 2,714.26 99.00 179.88 372.00 372.00 64.94 75.60 75.60 135.94 8.00 1,308.23 1,243.51 3,934.70 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 13816 7/21/2022 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 13817 7/21/2022 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) 209466 7/1/2022 022964 ELLIS FIRM APLC, THE, AND CAROLCAPONE 209602 7/28/2022 004594 2 HOT UNIFORMS INC 209603 7/28/2022 007186 AB MAILING SOLUTIONS 209604 7/28/2022 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES INC (Continued) Description STATE TAX PAYMENT FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT RELEASE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT UNIFORMS: TCC: FIRE DEPT MAILING SVCS: SEASON BROCHURE THEATER MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC TOOLS & EQUIP: CRC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSD MISC TOOLS AND EQUIP: CRC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES/EQUIP: CRC: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MPSC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: TVM: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: PW: CIP MISC OFC SUPPLIES: THEATER: TCSD MEDIC CART SUPPLIES: EMS STATION EQUIP: FIRE DEPT 209605 7/28/2022 003520 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF Yearly Digital Music License: COMPOSERS, AUTHORS & PUBLISHERS 209606 7/28/2022 021689 ASCENT ENVIRONMENTAL INC SEIR: TEM VLY HOSPITAL: PA22-0105 JUN INITIAL STUDY: RENDEZ PH II: PLNC 209607 7/28/2022 022703 ATOM ENGINEERING RET RELEASE: FLOOD CONTROL CONSTRUCTION REPAIR 209608 7/28/2022 017788 BARTEL ASSOCIATES LLC CONSULTING SVCS: OPEB 6/30/21: FIN 209609 7/28/2022 022477 BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS REGIST: OUTLAW MOTOR GANGS TRAINING, INC CLASS: PD 209610 7/28/2022 004262 BIO TOX LABORATORIES PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF Amount Paid Check Total 50, 314.42 147,798.10 50,000.00 739.50 236.71 2,759.45 2,698.90 2,184.63 1,590.41 1,301.37 1,191.39 557.04 367.03 141.04 111.04 85.99 56.10 54.36 48.93 -32.61 -130.08 286.00 91,263.95 1,475.00 54,830.81 4,070.00 100.00 3,556.00 157.00 50,314.42 147, 798.10 50,000.00 739.50 236.71 12,984.99 286.00 92,738.95 54,830.81 4,070.00 100.00 3,713.00 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 209611 7/28/2022 001323 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, 5/23-6/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: DBA READYREFRESH HARVESTON PARK 209612 7/28/2022 021851 CALIF NEWSPAPERS JUN PUBLIC NTCADS: CITY CLERK PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 209613 7/28/2022 004971 CANON FINANCIAL SERVICES JUL COPIERS LEASE: LIBRARY INC 209614 7/28/2022 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND, MISC ENG SVS: MRC IMPROV REVIEW CONSULTING INC 17-21 209615 7/28/2022 022940 CITY DATA SERVICES LLC JUN MONTHLY MAINT-HOUSING: PL 209616 7/28/2022 021006 CLARIS INTERNATIONAL INC FILEMAKER LICENSING: IT 209617 7/28/2022 013379 COSSOU, CELINE TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 209618 7/28/2022 012600 DAVID EVANS AND JUN DSGN SVCS: DIAZ RD PROJ ASSOCIATES INC PW17-25 209619 7/28/2022 020360 DE NOVO PLANNING GROUP CONSULTING SVCS:HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE 209620 7/28/2022 008943 DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES MASSAGE APPEAL: LAVENDER (DGS) MASSAGE MASSAGE APPEAL: LAVENDER MASSAC MASSAGE APPEAL: LAVENDER MASSAC MASSAGE APPEAL: LAVENDER MASSAC 209621 7/28/2022 021113 DISCOVERY SCIENCE CTR OF DAY CAMP EXCURSION: CRC: TCSD OC, DBA DISCOVERY CUBE OF OC 209622 7/28/2022 022964 ELLIS FIRM APLC, THE, AND RELEASE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT CAROLCAPONE 209623 7/28/2022 019469 FALCON ENGINEERING CNSTRCTN MGMT SVCS: SANTA SERVICES GERTRUDIS CRK 209624 7/28/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: CITY CLERK 209625 7/28/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: CIP: PW Amount Paid Check Total 9.69 9.69 6,905.50 6,905.50 671.56 671.56 180.00 180.00 7,540.00 7,540.00 2,184.00 2,184.00 4,725.00 4,725.00 10,832.67 10,832.67 16,496.00 16,496.00 231.00 6.75 4.50 2.25 244.50 280.00 280.00 50,000.00 50,000.00 42,772.72 42,772.72 38.63 38.63 15.23 15.23 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209626 7/28/2022 022938 FIREHOUSE INNOVATIONS CORP 209627 7/28/2022 020725 GRANICUS LLC, DBA GRANICUS 209628 7/28/2022 009950 EMPLOYEE #00423 209629 7/28/2022 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC 209630 7/28/2022 020698 HICKS AND HARTWICK INC 209631 7/28/2022 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC 209632 7/28/2022 002531 K A T Y FM RADIO 209633 7/28/2022 016257 KELLY SPICERS INC, DBA KELLY SPICERS STORES 209634 7/28/2022 022993 EMPLOYEE #00626 209635 7/28/2022 001091 KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES INC 209636 7/28/2022 000488 KNOTTS BERRY FARM 209637 7/28/2022 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA TEMECULA TROPHY& DES 209638 7/28/2022 009923 L S AASSOCIATES INC 209639 7/28/2022 014432 LANAIR GROUP LLC 209640 7/28/2022 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY AND WHITMORE (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total TRAINING SUPPLIES: FIRE DEPT 8,720.00 8,720.00 AGENDA MGMT RENEWALL: INFO 61,360.33 61,360.33 TECH REIMB: REGISTRATION: ADOBE CONF 1,195.00 1,195.00 MAINT SUPPLIES: FACILTIES: PW 6,700.02 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC 3,850.65 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: CRC &AQUATIC 2,149.64 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW 1,492.85 MAINT SUPPLIES: STREETS MAINT: PW 754.31 MISC MAINT SUPPLIES: FOC 82.97 15,030.44 ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: 9,555.00 9,555.00 SOLANA WAY EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 40.00 40.00 PAYMENT SIMULCAST SVCS 4TH OF JULY: TCSD 3,000.00 3,000.00 MISC PAPER SUPPLIES: IT 2,645.33 2,645.33 REIMB: UNIFORMS: BLDG & SAFETY 150.00 150.00 CONSULTSVC: RENDEZVOUS APTS 1,856.25 1,856.25 PA20-1325 EXCURSION: SUMMER DAY CAMP: 7,356.00 7,356.00 TCSD ENGRAVING SVCS: NAME BADGES: 119.08 119.08 PLANNING CONSULTANT PREP: RANCHO SOLEO 1,395.00 1,395.00 MITEL ANNUAL PARTNER SUPPORT: 25,213.69 25,213.69 INFO TECH MAY HR LEGAL SVCS FOR 1,002.80 TE060-00001 MAY HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00011 285.00 1,287.80 Page.-6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 209641 7/28/2022 003782 MAIN STREET SIGNS, DBA STREET NAME SIGN: EMPLOYEE #00484 ATHACO INC CITY STREET SIGNAGE: STREET MAINT: PW 209642 7/28/2022 017861 MYTHOS TECHNOLOGY INC JUL-SEP MONITORING SVCS: TVE2 209643 7/28/2022 003964 OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESS SVS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CIP: PW DIV MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CIP: PW MISC OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW MISC OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW 209644 7/28/2022 022936 OSCARS BREWING COMPANY, RFRSHMNTS: SUMMER DAY CAMP: DBA OBC INC TCSD 209645 7/28/2022 002579 POTAMUS PRESS CERTIFICATE FOLDERS: CITY CLERK 209646 7/28/2022 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: CITY MGR COMPANY INC 209647 7/28/2022 022476 RICHERSON, ANTHONY, STATION EQUIPMENT: FIRE STA 12 BUDGET BLINDS OF TEMECULA 209648 7/28/2022 000353 RIVERSIDE CO AUDITOR, DEC'21 PRKG CITATION CONTROLLER ASSESSMENTS 209649 7/28/2022 014027 RIVERSIDE CO ECO DEV AGENCY, LIBRARY DIV 209650 7/28/2022 022715 RIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION 209651 7/28/2022 022715 RIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION NOV'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS AUG '21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS JUL'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS MAR'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS OCT'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS FEB'22 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS SEP'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS JAN '22 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS JUN '21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS APR'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS MAY'21 PRKG CITATION ASSESSMENTS STAFFING: LIBRARY JUN EMERG RADIO RENTALS: POLICE JUN EMERG RADIO RENTALS: CODE ENF MAY EMERG RADIO RENTALS: CODE ENF Amount Paid Check Total 91.82 59.26 450.00 267.58 259.61 141.65 13.25 616.61 1,554.04 611.45 2,799.28 4,674.00 4,526.00 4,328.00 4,221.00 3,918.00 3,807.50 3,631.00 3,359.00 3,095.50 2,967.50 2,744.50 2,355.50 34,580.00 2,000.15 143.64 143.64 151.08 450.00 682.09 616.61 1,554.04 611.45 2,799.28 43,627.50 34,580.00 2,000.15 287.28 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 209652 7/28/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 04/01-06/30 TOWING SRVCS: POLICE DEPT REGISTRATION ANNUAL AWARD: POLICI 209653 7/28/2022 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC TRAFFIC PAINT: STAMPEDE PARKING LOT 209654 7/28/2022 000278 SAN DIEGO UNION -TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION: FINANCE DEPT 209655 7/28/2022 020545 SOCIAL WORK ACTION GROUP HOMELESS/STREET OUTREACH SVCS:TCSD 209656 7/28/2022 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: ADMIN: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: ADMIN: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: CONTRACT CLASSES:' MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: ADMIN: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC: TCSD 209657 7/28/2022 006529 TEMECULA VALLEY GARDEN REFUND: SECURITY DEPOSIT CRC CLUB 5/10/22 209658 7/28/2022 003941 TEMECULA WINNELSON PLUMBING SUPPLIES: PARKS: PW COMPANY 209659 7/28/2022 020911 T-MOBILE USA, INC. GPS LOCATE SVCS: 5/1-6/9/22 PD 209660 7/28/2022 022046 TURBOSCAPE INC LANDSCAPE MULCH: PW: PARKS 209661 7/28/2022 011659 ULINE INC MISC SUPPLIES: SUPPORT SVCS 209662 7/28/2022 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULA AUTO JUN VEHCILE DETAILING SVCS: FIRE SPA LLC APRIL VEHICLE DETAILING: FIRE JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: PARKS: JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: STREET JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: PARKS: JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: CIP 209663 7/28/2022 021410 VIRTUAL PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT MGMT SYSTEM: PW: CIP LLC Amount Paid Check Total 2,189.00 300.00 2,489.00 7,177.73 7,177.73 137.03 137.03 29,563.30 29,563.30 1,043.31 938.45 910.69 496.82 434.99 62.88 53.85 33.70 24.99 10.93 4,010.61 200.00 200.00 391.15 391.15 25.00 25.00 40,300.00 40,300.00 2,163.29 2,163.29 200.00 115.00 30.00 20.00 20.00 15.00 400.00 12,000.00 12,000.00 Pages apChkLst Final Check List Page: 9 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 209664 7/28/2022 001890 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC BAY DOOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT: STA 2,252.34 2,252.34 73 209665 7/28/2022 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC JUN INSPECTION SVCS: LAND 12,903.00 CONSULTING LLC, ANSER DEV/NPDES ADVISORY MNGMT LLC CONST MGMT SVS: TRAFFIC SIGNALS P 6,047.00 JUN CONSTRCTN MGMT SVCS: FIBER O 4,391.00 23,341.00 209666 7/28/2022 007987 WALMART HOMELESS OUTREACH: TCSD 1,336.63 MISC SUPPLIES & EQUIP: CRC: TCSD 717.16 HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIES: THEATI 449.82 MISC TOOLS/EQUIPMENT: CRC 448.61 MISC SUPPLIES: SPORTS: TCSD 266.11 HOSPITALITY & MISC SUPPLIES: THEATI 244.67 MISC SUPPLIES: SKATE PARK: CRC 237.41 MISC SUPPLIES: CONTRACT CLASSES: 215.83 MISC SUPPLIES: SPECIAL EVENTS: TCS 76.92 3,993.16 209667 7/28/2022 001342 WAXIE SANITARY SUPPLY INC CLEANING SUPPLIES: PW: PARKS 398.57 398.57 209668 7/28/2022 020670 WEBB MUNICIPAL FINANCE SPECIAL TAX ADMINISTRATION FY 11,216.70 LLC 21 /22 SPECIAL TAXADMIN: TCSD SRVC LEVEL 9,885.65 21,102.35 209669 7/28/2022 013556 WESTERN AV REPLACE CABLE TV BROADCAST 20,893.19 20,893.19 EQUIP: PEG: 1 209670 7/28/2022 002841 WESTERN OILFIELDS SUPPLY TEMP IRRIG FOR 7/4 EVENT: TCSD 10,074.36 10,074.36 CO, DBA: RAIN FOR RENT 209671 7/28/2022 005118 EMPLOYEE #00327 REIMB: MISC SUPPLIES: AQUATICS 326.23 326.23 Grand total for UNION BANK: 1,091,122.09 Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 07/28/2022 2:59:13PM CITY OF TEMECULA 85 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 1,091,122.09 Page:10 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 1 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description 502797 8/4/2022 022546 AIRWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, AIRWAVE FREQUENCIES: EOC ENTERPRISES 502798 8/4/2022 004240 AMERICAN FORENSIC NURSES JUL STAND BY FEE: POLICE AFN AUG STAND BY FEE: POLICE DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIF DRUG/ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: TEM SHERIF 502799 8/4/2022 000936 AMERICAN RED CROSS, STAFF/LIFEGUARDS CERTS: HEALTH AND SAFETY SVCS AQUATICS 502800 8/4/2022 021670 ANLIND OF TEMECULA INC, MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM TEMECULA HARLEY-DAVIDSON SHERIFF MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM SHE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM SHE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM SHE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM SHE MOTORCYCLE REPAIR/MAINT: TEM SHE 502801 8/4/2022 013950 AQUA CHILL OF SAN DIEGO JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: CIVIC CTR JUN DRINKING WTR SYS MAINT: JRC 502802 8/4/2022 001445 ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: JUL-SEP'21 TEMECULA, VALLEY 502803 8/4/2022 018941 AZTEC LANDSCAPING INC JUL MAINT SVCS: PARKS/SCHOOLS: PW 502804 8/4/2022 022670 BROWN, JAMAL DEON, DBA TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS JDB TRAINING 502805 8/4/2022 004248 CALIF DEPT OF JUNE BLOOD & ALCOHOL ANALYSIS: JUSTICE-ACCTING PD 502806 8/4/2022 021133 CNS ENGINEERS INC 3/12-6/30 ENG SVCS: OVRLAND BR PW16-05 502807 8/4/2022 004412 COMPLETE TENNIS CAMP, TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS CTC TENNIS AKA KERRY LE 502808 8/4/2022 000442 COMPUTER ALERT SYSTEMS APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: FIRE ALARM MONITORING: SKATE PARK: PAR ALARM MONITORING: SPORTS RANCH: APR-JUN ALARM SYS MONITORING: POI 502809 8/4/2022 010650 CRAFTSMEN PLUMBING & PLUMBING SVC: FIRE STA95 HVAC INC PLUMBING SVC: TPL: PW Amount Paid Check Total 1,825.00 1,825.00 1,420.55 1,420.55 935.90 180.60 3,957.60 4,265.00 4,265.00 505.32 460.30 427.94 390.70 381.12 351.62 2,517.00 424.00 28.28 452.28 6,969.61 6,969.61 9,098.22 9,098.22 4,130.00 4,130.00 1,155.00 1,155.00 108, 065.06 108, 065.06 10,162.15 10,162.15 405.00 243.13 225.00 193.58 1,066.71 6,350.00 404.28 6,754.28 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 502810 8/4/2022 001393 DATA TICKET INC, DBA JUN CITATIONS PROCESSING: POLICE REVENUE EXPERTS 502811 8/4/2022 022483 DE LA SECURA INC, DBA DLS DSGN-BUILD SVCS: MRC: PW17-21 BUILDERS DSGN-BUILD SVCS: MRC: PW17-21 502812 8/4/2022 020648 DG INVESTMENT HOLDINGS 2 MAINT & REPAIR OF SECURITY INC, CONVERGINT SYSTEM: IT TECHNOLOGIES CITYWIDE SURVEILLANCE: INFO TECH 502813 8/4/2022 003945 DIAMOND ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPORARY FENCING: JRC SRVCS PORTABLE RESTROOM SVCS: RRSP: CII 502814 8/4/2022 004192 DOWNS ENERGY FUEL FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK RANGERS:PW FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: FIRE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: INFO TECH FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: TCSD FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: PARK RANGE FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: EOC FUEL FOR CITY VEHICLES: POLICE 502815 8/4/2022 012217 DUDEK APR CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: PW11-10 502816 8/4/2022 011202 EMH SPORTS USA INC TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS 502817 8/4/2022 009618 ENNIS FLINT INC MISC SUPPLIES: PW STREET MAINT 502818 8/4/2022 022726 FORENSIC NURSING OF SART EXAM: TEM SHERIFF SOCAL INC 502819 8/4/2022 000177 GLENNIES OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFC SUPPLIES: CRC: AQUATICS INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: SUPPORT SVCS 502820 8/4/2022 009475 GOLDEN STAR TECHNOLOGY, TABLETS & PRINTERS FOR TRAFFIC: INC, DBA: GST TEM SHER 502821 8/4/2022 003792 GRAINGER MISC SUPPLIES: CRC: FACILITIES 502822 8/4/2022 003342 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, CDBG REIMB: WEEKS INLAND VALLEY INC CDBG REIMB: LEGG CDBG REIMB: WILSON 502823 8/4/2022 001135 HEALTHPOINTE MEDICAL MEDICAL SCREENINGS: HR GROUP INC, DBA: FIRST CARE INDUSTRIA Amount Paid Check Total 937.85 937.85 94,652.46 94,492.57 189,145.03 12,715.20 9,861.43 22,576.63 95.00 118.13 213.13 488.11 186.26 178.90 136.10 105.12 91.87 76.23 1,262.59 8,934.48 8,934.48 1,928.50 1,928.50 4,846.97 4,846.97 1,200.00 1,200.00 585.08 40.54 625.62 9,068.06 9,068.06 668.47 668.47 13,300.87 10,051.20 5,449.44 28,801.51 2,500.00 2,500.00 Paget apChkLst Final Check List Page: 3 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 502824 8/4/2022 006914 INNOVATIVE DOCUMENT SOLUTIONS 502825 8/4/2022 019085 INTERPRETERS UNLIMITED INC 502826 8/4/2022 012285 JOHNSTONE SUPPLY 502827 8/4/2022 000482 LEIGHTON CONSULTING INC 502828 8/4/2022 003726 LIFE ASSIST INC (Continued) Description JUN COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAI R:CITYW I DE MAY COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR:CIT CANON COPIER FAX BOARDS: IT JUN COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR:CIT` MAY COPIER MAINT/USAGE/REPAIR:CIT PLOTTER & COPIER SUPPLIES: SUPPOF INTERPRETER SVCS: TEM SHERIFF MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER MISC SUPPLIES: THEATER GEOTECH/MTAL'S TESTING SVCS: PW18-11 GEOTECH & MATL TESTING: MINI PMP T GEOTECH & MATL TESTING: MINI PUMP :1i•I:1 lie] A04 OVA LTA I:18][e7_1�Y�lZ!a•IA1][41 502829 8/4/2022 022664 MARIPOSA TREE TREE SERVICES - MAY 2022 MANAGEMENT INC TREE SERVICES - MAY 2022 SLOPE TREE TRIMMING: HARVESTON: F TREE SERVICES - MAY 2022 TREE TRIMMING SLOPES: SADDLEWOO TREE TRIMMING: RON REAGAN SPORT: EMERG SLOPE TRIMMING: SADDLEWOC TREE SERVICES - MAY 2022 502830 8/4/2022 018675 MDG ASSOCIATES INC JUN ADA LABOR COMPLIANCE: PW18-16 MAY LABOR COMP SVCS: PW18-16 502831 8/4/2022 019823 MERCHANTS BLDG MAINT LLC JUN JANITORIAL SVCS: VARIOUS FACS JUN JANITORIAL SVCS: POLICE 502832 8/4/2022 004951 MIKE'S PRECISION WELDING REPAIR SVCS: PRESSURE WASHER: INC PW 502833 8/4/2022 004043 MISSION ELECTRIC SUPPLY ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: PARKING INC GARAGE: PW MISC ELECT SUPP: OLD TOWN PARKING MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: THEATER MISC SUPPLIES: OLD TOWN: FACILITIES 502834 8/4/2022 004586 MOORE FENCE COMPANY INC SHELTER FOR ELECTRIC BUS 502835 8/4/2022 004040 MORAMARCO ANTHONY J, BANNERS AND SIGNAGE: JCR: TCSD DBA BIGFOOT GRAPHICS TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS Amount Paid Check Total 6,732.27 5,847.09 1,657.35 767.50 533.25 110.81 19.50 244.20 244.20 4,116.10 719.80 683.20 180.09 31,419.00 16,728.00 14,136.00 10,768.00 4,594.00 2,262.00 1,516.00 675.00 100.00 50.00 24,611.13 879.18 1,150.00 13,033.30 588.77 113.64 22.11 24,746.53 2,000.00 1.871.63 15,648.27 19.50 488.40 5,519.10 180.09 82,098.00 150.00 25,490.31 1,150.00 13, 757.82 24,746.53 3,871.63 Page:3 apChkLst 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 4 Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 502836 8/4/2022 020946 MUSSON THEATRICAL INC SOUND/LIGHTING SUPPLIES: 1,082.35 1,082.35 THEATER 502837 8/4/2022 022599 NIEVES LANDSCAPE INC MAY LDSCP MAINT: PARKS/TRAILS: 56,004.00 PW 4TH OF JULY CLEANUP SVCS: PW 11,670.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: P-24 HARVESTON 2,053.92 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: 79 TEM PKWY 970.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: P-17 VIAL RANCH 935.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: P-17 VAIL RANCH 873.95 TREE INSTALLATION: VARIOUS PARKS 600.00 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: P-22 B PAUBA RIE 474.57 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: SP-02 PALOMA DE 278.50 IRRIGATION REPAIRS: P-16 LONG CANY, 99.97 73,959.91 502838 8/4/2022 009337 NV5 INC JUN PROJ MGT SVCS: MRC, PW17-21 29,650.00 29,650.00 502839 8/4/2022 021998 OLD TOWN TIRE AND SERVICE VEHICLE MAINT: TCSD 580.15 580.15 INC 502840 8/4/2022 012904 PROACTIVE FIRE DESIGN PLAN REVIEW SVC: PREVENTION: 11,210.90 11,210.90 AND, CONSULTING FIRE DEPT 502841 8/4/2022 005075 PRUDENTIAL OVERALL 6130 FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTAL: 95.70 SUPPLY CIVIC CTR FLOOR MATS/TOWEL RENTALS: FOC 9.70 105.40 502842 8/4/2022 022537 REFRIGERATION SUPPLIES, MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE 758.72 DISTRIBUTOR MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE 110.36 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE 81.35 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE 81.35 MISC HVAC SUPPLIES: FIRE 32.86 1,064.64 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 502843 8/4/2022 002412 RICHARDS WATSON AND JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 19,196.19 GERSHON JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 9,799.95 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 5,044.84 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 3,503.00 APR 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 3,347.42 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 2,334.16 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 2,284.45 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 2,233.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 2,187.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,885.00 MAY 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,479.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,442.72 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,417.50 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,402.50 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 1,248.50 APR 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 998.50 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 912.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 842.50 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 675.86 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 493.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 464.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 450.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 406.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 234.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 232.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 145.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 90.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 87.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 52.00 JUN 2022 LEGAL SERVICES 45.00 502844 8/4/2022 003072 RIVERSIDE AREA RAPE CRISIS CDBG REIMB: JAN - MAR'22 1,681.34 CTR CDBG REIMB: APR - JUN '22 1,269.58 502845 8/4/2022 005329 SAFE FAMILY JUSTICE CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: APR 2022 584.87 CENTERS 502846 8/4/2022 022659 SIDI, SEBASTIAN, DBASEBAZ VIDEO SVCS: ECON DEV 2,100.00 VIDEO PRODUCTIO 502847 8/4/2022 021620 SIEMENS MOBILITY INC, STREET LIGHT MAINT: STREETS: PW 2,183.16 YUNEX LLC 502848 8/4/2022 009746 SIGNS BY TOMORROW MISC SIGNAGE: CITY HALL: FACILITIES 2,869.69 MISC SIGNAGE: FACILITIES 820.00 64,932.09 2,950.92 584.87 2,100.00 2,183.16 3,689.69 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: eunion EFT UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 502849 8/4/2022 013482 SILVERMAN ENTERPRISES INC, DBA BAS SECURITY 502850 8/4/2022 003840 STRONG'S PAINTING 502851 8/4/2022 020399 VOICES FOR CHILDREN 502852 8/4/2022 021024 YANES BLANCAA, DBA DE GANGE CONSULTING Page: 6 (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total SECURITY SVCS: TCSD FACILITIES 2,899.00 PAINTING SVCS: THEATER: PW 450.00 CDBG REIMBURSEMENT. APR-JUN'22 4,131.01 JUN LDSCP PLN CK & INSPECTION: 24,385.00 PILING Grand total for EFT UNION BANK: 2,899.00 450.00 4,131.01 24,385.00 832,205.49 Page6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 08/02/2022 4:09:57PM CITY OF TEMECULA 56 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 832,205.49 Page:? apChkLst 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 1 Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 13553 6/22/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 127,869.70 127,869.70 RETIREMENT) 13689 6/27/2022 022945 AZ DEPT OF ECONOMIC 2ND QTR 2021 UI PAYMENT 190.40 190.40 SECURITY 13690 6/27/2022 022945 AZ DEPT OF ECONOMIC 3RD QTR 2021 UI PAYMENT 35.00 35.00 SECURITY 13691 6/27/2022 022945 AZ DEPT OF ECONOMIC 4TH QTR 2021 UI PAYMENT 35.00 35.00 SECURITY 13692 6/9/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.01 0.01 PREMIUM 13693 5/12/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.01 0.01 PREMIUM 13694 1/6/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.01 0.01 PREMIUM 13711 7/7/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 157,081.62 PREMIUM PERS HEALTH PAYMENT 0.00 157,081.62 13712 7/26/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT 128,187.82 128,187.82 RETIREMENT) 13786 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700390905802 28301 RANCHO 21.90 21.90 13787 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700454673905 41000 MAIN ST 117.53 117.53 13788 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700116582930 44205 MAIN ST 141.79 141.79 13789 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700037888042 32005 MURRIETA 204.22 204.22 HOT 13790 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700039456210 41000 MAIN ST 261.43 261.43 13791 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700213755712 28816 PUJOL ST 1,327.02 1,327.02 13792 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700052349631 42081 MAIN ST 3,060.60 3,060.60 Page:1 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 2 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 13793 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700173434428 42051 MAIN ST 13794 7/13/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700709687915 41000 MAIN ST 13795 7/14/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN 117-188-6393-6: 32131 S LOOP RD 13806 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 016868 LEAGUE OF AMERICAN MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PLANNING BICYCLISTS DEPT 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PLANNING ASSOCIATION DEPT 020535 LUNA GRILL RFRSHMNTS: PLAN COMMISSION MTG 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PLANNING ASSOCIATION DEPT 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PLANNING ASSOCIATION DEPT 022884 BOARD AND BREW RFRSHMNTS: PLAN COMMISSION MTG 000747 AMERICAN PLANNING MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: PLANNING ASSOCIATION DEPT 13807 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 006937 SOUTHWEST AIRLINES AIRFARE: ICMA CONF: CITY CLERK 018979 ICMA MEMBERSHIP DUES: CITY CLERK 017736 FEAST CALIFORNIA CAFE LLC, RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL BUDGET DBA CORNER BAKERY CAFE WORKSHOP 023008 PANDA EXPRESS RFRSHMNTS: CITY CNCL CLOSED SESSION 000254 PRESS ENTERPRISE ONLINE SUBSCRIPTION: CITY CLERK COMPANY INC 000912 CITY CLERKS ASSN OF CALIF MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL: CITY CLERK 018979 ICMA REGIST: CONFERENCE: CITY CLERK 13821 7/21/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' PERS RETIREMENT PAYMENT RETIREMENT) 13824 7/18/2022 013286 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC MAY ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT 13825 7/18/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 28816 PUJOL ST 13826 7/18/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST Amount Paid Check Total 9,519.59 9,519.59 10,209.87 10,209.87 139.24 139.24 45.00 99.00 164.15 727.00 470.00 130.50 398.00 2,033.65 462.81 200.00 309.67 233.05 14.00 200.00 850.00 2,269.53 137, 384.72 137, 384.72 300.00 300.00 600.91 600.91 885.23 885.23 Paget apChkLst 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 3 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 13830 7/20/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST 298.38 298.38 13831 7/14/2022 000246 PERS (EMPLOYEES' FY21/22 - 1959 SURVIVOR BENEFITT 10,899.30 10,899.30 RETIREMENT) 13832 7/22/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC JUL INTERNET SVCS: DMV LINE 100.98 100.98 13833 7/26/2022 004236 JP MORGAN TEM GARDENS ANNUAL PLEDGE 295,000.00 295,000.00 CHASE/WASHINGTON, FUND PMT MUTUAL BANK 13835 7/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES TRAINING PROPS: ACTIVE SHOOTER: 127.51 INC EOC 011659 ULINE INC HARD HATS: EOC 383.08 000186 HANKS HARDWARE INC FIELD EQUIPMENT: EOC 132.07 642.66 13836 7/28/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC JUL INTERNET SVCS: SKATE PARK & 191.01 191.01 SENIOR C 13837 7/28/2022 018858 FRONTIER CALIFORNIA INC JUL INTERNET SVCS: CITY HALL 295.98 295.98 13838 7/25/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 42569 600.91 600.91 MARGARITA RD 13839 7/25/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 30875 RANCHO 600.91 VISTA RD JULY INTERNET SVCS 30600 PAUBA RD 625.16 1,226.07 13840 7/27/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 41000 MAIN ST 49.93 49.93 13841 7/28/2022 010276 TIME WARNER CABLE JULY INTERNET SVCS 32380 DEER 600.91 600.91 HOLLOW WAY 13843 7/18/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700418750458 31777 DE 19.63 19.63 PORTOLA RD 13844 7/18/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700251991189 45602 REDHAWK 25.49 25.49 PKWY 13845 7/18/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700306036256 41000 MAIN ST 108.53 108.53 13846 7/18/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700572390172 41000 MAIN ST 157.81 157.81 Page:3 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 4 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 13847 7/18/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 600001509166 41000 MAIN ST 13848 7/19/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700619554097 30051 RANCHO VISTA 13849 7/19/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700503663349 28916 PUJOL ST 13850 7/19/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700503770150 28922 PUJOL ST 13851 7/19/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 600001004059 41000 MAIN ST 13852 7/19/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700025717269 30875 RANCHO VISTA 13853 7/20/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700618534991 4100 MAIN ST 13854 7/20/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700367835663 28582 HARVESTON DR 13855 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700030933344 26706 YNEZ RD 13856 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700145715868 41000 MAIN ST 13857 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700246548782 41000 MAIN ST 13858 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700246573943 41000 MAIN ST 13859 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700475634086 41000 MAIN ST 13860 7/25/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700408183926 41000 MAIN ST 13861 7/27/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700252118808 29721 RYECREST 13862 7/27/2022 000537 SO CALIF EDISON JUNE 700606072010 41000 MAIN ST 13863 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH DIST LOOP RD 13864 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 39656 DIEGO DR DIST Amount Paid Check Total 20,629.25 20,629.25 18.89 18.89 58.66 58.66 216.44 216.44 8,548.48 8,548.48 12,505.26 12,505.26 38.92 38.92 1,025.31 1,025.31 87.42 87.42 97.69 97.69 118.61 118.61 181.02 181.02 444.51 444.51 3,185.65 3,185.65 17.54 17.54 457.41 457.41 49.65 49.65 133.89 133.89 Page:4 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 5 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 13865 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 32101 SOMMERS DIST BEND 13866 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 31991 RORIPAUGH DIST VALLEY 13867 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH DIST LOOP ROD 13868 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 32131 SOUTH DIST LOOP RD 13869 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 31991 RORIPAUGH DIST VALLEY 13870 7/19/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 0 SOMMERS BEND DIST 13871 7/25/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT DIST SPRINGS RD 13872 7/25/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS MURRIETA HOT DIST SPRINGS RD 13873 7/25/2022 002390 EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER JUNE WATER SVCS 39569 SERAPHINA DIST RD 13874 7/26/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN 055-475-6169-5: 32380 DEER HOLLOW 13875 7/26/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN 015-575-0195-2: 32211 WOLF VALLEY RD 13876 7/26/2022 001212 SO CALIF GAS COMPANY JUN 091-085-1632-0: 41951 MORAGA RD 13877 7/29/2022 000262 RANCHO CALIF WATER VAR JUN WATER 3000385 RANCHO DISTRICT VISTA RD 13879 8/11/2022 006887 UNION BANK OF CALIFORNIA 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT OFC SUPPLIES: BADGES: EOC 023009 CENGAGE LEARNING INC TRAINING: GRANT WRITING: EOC 13886 8/4/2022 010349 CALIF DEPT OF CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT SUPPORT Amount Paid Check Total 167.11 167.11 172.55 172.55 192.92 192.92 220.05 220.05 2,826.45 2,826.45 9,900.53 9,900.53 93.36 93.36 573.21 573.21 725.47 725.47 14.79 14.79 203.31 203.31 390.41 390.41 30,826.67 30,826.67 50.51 299.00 349.51 612.99 612.99 Page:5 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 6 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 13887 8/4/2022 017429 COBRAADVANTAGE INC, DBA FSA REIMBURSEMENT PAYMENT THE ADVANTAGE GROUP 13888 8/4/2022 021301 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA- 401(A) RETIREMENT PLAN 106474 PAYMENT 13889 8/4/2022 000194 1 C M A RETIREMENT -PLAN ICMA-RC RETIREMENT TRUST 457 303355 PAYMENT 13890 8/4/2022 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) STATE TAX PAYMENT 13891 8/4/2022 000283 INSTATAX (IRS) FEDERAL TAX PAYMENT 13892 8/4/2022 001065 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT PAYMENT SOLUTION 13893 8/4/2022 019088 NATIONWIDE RETIREMENT NATIONWIDE LOAN REPAYMENT SOLUTION PAYMENT 13895 8/4/2022 000245 PERS - HEALTH INSUR PIERS HEALTH PAYMENT PREMIUM PIERS HEALTH PAYMENT 13899 7/28/2022 000444 INSTATAX (EDD) 2ND QTR 2022 UI & ETT PAYMENT 13906 7/28/2022 022945 AZ DEPT OF ECONOMIC 1 ST QTR 2022 UI SECURITY 13907 8/22/2022 013286 INTRADO LIFE & SAFETY INC JUNE ENTERPRISE 911 SVC: IT 209672 8/4/2022 007282 AMAZON CAPITAL SERVICES MISC SUPPLIES: EOC INC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: HR MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIP: EOC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: MALL: PD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: RISK MGMT MISC SMALL TOOLS & EQUIPMENT: EOC MISC OFC SUPPLIES: LAND DEV: PW 209673 8/4/2022 020691 ANN M HOWELL, DBAANN GRAPHIC DSGN & BANNER: ECO DEV HOWELL DESIGN Amount Paid Check Total 23,524.18 23,524.18 384.62 384.62 18,528.44 18,528.44 43,248.32 43,248.32 128,456.85 128,456.85 15,187.21 15,187.21 520.22 520.22 0.00 160, 037.24 160, 037.24 8,931.65 8,931.65 179.20 179.20 300.00 300.00 64.15 119.28 148.93 233.69 333.73 2,218.48 54.36 3,172.62 1,997.49 1,997.49 Page.-6 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 7 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor (Continued) Description 209674 8/4/2022 000101 APPLE ONE INC APR TEMP HELP: COM DEV MAY TEMP HELP: CIP: PW JUN TEMP HELP: COM DEV MAY TEMP HELP: PLANNING MAY TEMP HELP: FIRE DEPT JUN TEMP HELP: FINANCE JUN TEMP HELP: FIRE DEPT JUN TEMP HELP: CIP: PW 209675 8/4/2022 004623 AQUA SOURCE INC VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS VARIOUS SUPPLIES: AQUATICS: PW 209676 8/4/2022 007065 B&H PHOTO & ELECTRONICS MISCAV EQUIPMENT: PEG SUPPLIES: CORP IT 209677 8/4/2022 011954 BAKER AND TAYLOR INC BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: TCSD BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL:TCSD CREDIT: BOOK COLLECTIONS: RHRPTL: 209678 8/4/2022 015592 BAMM PROMOTIONAL STAFF UNIFORMS: CLASSES: TCSD PRODUCTS INC Embroidery: uniforms: Bldg & Safety 209679 8/4/2022 022477 BEHAVIORAL ANALYSIS STAFF TRAINING: POLICE DEPT TRAINING, INC 209680 8/4/2022 004262 BIO TOX LABORATORIES 209681 8/4/2022 001323 BLUETRITON BRANDS INC, DBA READYREFRESH 209682 8/4/2022 008013 EMPLOYEE #00169 209683 8/4/2022 003048 BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB, OF SOUTHWEST COUNTY 209684 8/4/2022 021851 CALIF NEWSPAPERS PARTNERSHIP, DBA SO CALIF NEWS GROUP 209685 8/4/2022 004604 CALPELRA 209686 8/4/2022 021054 CANTRELL,TINAJ PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF PHLEBOTOMY SVCS: TEM SHERIFF 06/11-07/10 WATER DELIVERY SVCS: FOC 05/23-06/22 WTR DLVRY SVC: PBSP REIMB: TYLER CONF: LAND DEV: PW CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: JAN-MAR'22 JUN PUBLIC NTC ADS: PW22-02 JUN PUBLIC NTC ADS: PLANNING JUN PUBLIC NTC ADS: PW21-06 JUN PUBLIC NTC ADS: PW21-10 REGIST: DISABILITY ACCOMODATIONS: HR TCSD INSTRUCTOR EARNINGS Amount Paid Check Total 7,011.12 1,392.64 8,685.63 9,357.87 3,669.76 1,277.64 4,587.20 4,939.94 3,322.66 3,407.14 2,237.42 90.54 -24.12 -20.69 -44.81 182.53 163.13 1,150.00 6,298.00 5,097.00 374.00 172.24 38.19 276.38 6,969.61 1,880.65 1,694.95 2,020.90 2,170.50 100.00 280.00 40,921.80 6,729.80 2,237.42 0.92 345.66 1,150.00 11,769.00 210.43 276.38 6,969.61 7,767.00 100.00 280.00 Page:? apChkLst Final Check List Page: 8 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description 209687 8/4/2022 018828 CASC ENGINEERING AND, JUN COMMERCIAL/IND'L CONSULTING INC INSPECTIONS: NPDES 209688 8/4/2022 004462 CDW LLC, DBA CDW PALO ALTO RACK: INFO TECH GOVERNMENT LLC 209689 8/4/2022 016446 CHRISTIAN STITCHERY INC, STAFF UNIFORMS: AQUATICS: TCSD DBA SO CAL IMPRESSIONS SPORTS AWARDS: SPORTS: TCSD 209690 8/4/2022 012627 CLEAR IMAGE ENTERPRISES WINDOW CLEANING: CIVIC CTR: PW INC, DBA:CLEAR IMAGE WINDOW CL PRESSURE WASH: PARKING GARAGE: I 209691 8/4/2022 022943 CLOUDCOMPLI INC STORMWATER MGMTAPP: PW 209692 8/4/2022 016530 COMMUNITY MISSION OF CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: APR-JUN '22 HOPE CDBG REIMBURSEMENT: JAN-MAR'22 209693 8/4/2022 023017 CONDREN, BETTY REFUND: CLASSES: FIT, FUN, & FAB 209694 8/4/2022 002945 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TVE2 DIST ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: TCC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES: CHILDRENS ML 209695 8/4/2022 014521 COSTAR REALTY JULY'22 WEB SUBSCRIPTION: ECO INFORMATION INC DEV 209696 8/4/2022 004329 COSTCO TEMECULA491 SUPPLIES: FOOD SVC PRGM: TCSD SUPPLIES: FOOD SVC PRGM: TCSD 209697 8/4/2022 012600 DAVID EVANS AND ENG SVCS: BIDDING & CONST: ASSOCIATES INC PW19-18 JUN ENG SVCS: BIDDING & CONST: PW1 209698 8/4/2022 010461 DEMCO INC MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD MISC SUPPLIES: RHRTPL: TCSD 209699 8/4/2022 022798 DS SERVICES OF AMERICA WATER DELIVERY: CMO INC, SPARKLETTS 209700 8/4/2022 022964 ELLIS FIRM APLC, THE, AND CAROLCAPONE 209701 8/4/2022 000164 ESGIL LLC RELEASE CLAIMS SETTLEMENT MAY PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV MAR PLAN CHECK SVCS: COMDEV JUN PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV DEPT APR PLAN CK SVCS: COMDEV Amount Paid 6,754.00 9,151.77 2,760.62 755.81 12,858.00 13,360.00 10,200.00 3,081.61 2,376.00 16.25 448.59 478.50 735.15 1,200.00 635.93 233.24 615.50 747.00 630.95 971.13 51.40 50,000.00 19,596.26 32,590.95 84,772.24 19,029.12 Check Total 6,754.00 9,151.77 3,516.43 26,218.00 10,200.00 5,457.61 16.25 1,662.24 1,200.00 869.17 1,362.50 1,602.08 51.40 50,000.00 155,988.57 Page:8 apChkLst 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 9 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 209702 8/4/2022 021859 EXP US SERVICES INC CONSULT SVCS: SANTA GERTRUDIS 13,064.94 13,064.94 CRK TRAIL 209703 8/4/2022 017432 EYEMED VISION CARE VISION PLAN PAYMENT 1,781.36 1,781.36 209704 8/4/2022 000165 FEDERAL EXPRESS INC EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: TCSD 11.65 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: THEATER: TCSD 382.37 EXPRESS MAILING SVCS: TCSD 30.52 EXPRESS MAIL SVCS: THEATER: TCSD 20.80 445.34 209705 8/4/2022 013937 FIRST AMERICAN TITLE TITLE REPORTS: OVERLAND 1,000.00 1,000.00 INSURANCE WIDENING: 20-11 209706 8/4/2022 000380 FIRST STUDENT CHARTER, TRANSP: SUMMER DAY CAMP: TCSD 617.31 DBA FIRST STUDENT INC TRANSP: SUMMER DAY CAMP: TCSD 617.31 TRANSP: SUMMER DAY CAMP: TCSD 942.01 2,176.63 209707 8/4/2022 002982 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD SUPPORT PAYMENT 50.00 50.00 209708 8/4/2022 009097 FULL COMPASS SYSTEMS SOUND/LIGHTING & MISC SUPPLIES: 5,838.34 5,838.34 THEATER 209709 8/4/2022 013749 HELIXSTORM INC IT INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT: IT 1,012.50 1,012.50 209710 8/4/2022 020698 HICKS AND HARTWICK INC ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: 2,070.00 SOLANA WAY ENG PLAN CK SVCS: LAND DEV: PRADO 7,695.00 9,765.00 209711 8/4/2022 003198 HOME DEPOT EQUIPMENT: CRC: TCSD 76.10 76.10 209712 8/4/2022 009135 IMPACT MARKETING & DESIGN BLUETOOTH SPEAKER FOR LIBRARY: 1,383.26 1,383.26 INC TCSD 209713 8/4/2022 022569 INLAND FLEET SOLUTIONS INC MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT: PW 241.74 PARKS MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT: PW PARKS 241.74 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT: PW PARKS 285.84 MAINTENANCE EQUIPMENT: PW PARKS 92.84 862.16 209714 8/4/2022 012883 JACOB'S HOUSE INC EMPLOYEE CHARITY DONATIONS 40.00 40.00 PAYMENT 209715 8/4/2022 001091 KEYSER MARSTON RENDEZVOUS APTS PA20-1325 FISCAL 1,405.00 1,405.00 ASSOCIATES INC IMPACT Page9 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 10 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209716 8/4/2022 017118 KRACH BREE B, DBA TEMECULA TROPHY & DES (Continued) Description NAME BADGES: PLANNING AWARD PLAQUES: SANTA PARADE: TCS PUBLIC/TRAFFIC SAFETY COMM: PW: Tf 209717 8/4/2022 004905 LIEBERT, CASSIDY AND JUN HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00001 WHITMORE JUN HR LEGAL SVCS FOR TE060-00011 209718 8/4/2022 004813 M AND J PAUL ENTERPRISES JUMPER/GAME RENTALS: SPEC INC, DBA JOLLY JUMPS EVENTS: TCSD 209719 8/4/2022 011956 EMPLOYEE #00438 REIMB: ESRI CONF: INFO TECH 209720 8/4/2022 003076 MET LIFE INSURANCE DENTAL PAYMENT COMPANY 209721 8/4/2022 010167 ODYSSEY POWER UPS REPAIR: CIVIC CENTER: IT CORPORATION UPS REPAIR: CIVIC CENTER: IT 209722 8/4/2022 022936 OSCARS BREWING COMPANY, RFRSHMNTS: DAY CAMP: TCSD DBA OBC INC 209723 8/4/2022 002297 OVERLAND PACIFIC & CUTLER APR ACQUISITION SVCS: FLD CNTRL LLC EASEMENT ACQUISITION SVCS: NICOLAS/CALLE GI JUN ACQUISITION SVCS: FLD CENTRL E 209724 8/4/2022 022871 PACIFIC COAST REIMB EXPENSES: GRANT MATCH CONSERVATION OBLIGATION 209725 8/4/2022 019859 PGI - PACIFIC GRAPHICS INC. PRINTING SERVICES: THEATER: TCSD 209726 8/4/2022 023024 PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PROFESSIONAL SVCS: HR 209727 8/4/2022 010338 POOLAND ELECTRICAL, VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW PRODUCTS INC SPLASH PAD CHEMICALS & PARTS CHEMICALS & PARTS: SPLASH PAD: PW VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW VARIOUS SUPPLIES: SPLASH PAD: PW 209728 8/4/2022 005820 PRE -PAID LEGAL SERVICES PREPAID LEGAL SERVICES PAYMENT INC, DBA LEGALSHIELD 209729 8/4/2022 003155 PRICE CHOPPER INC PUBLIC SWIM WRISTBANDS: AQUATICS Amount Paid Check Total 34.80 332.78 147.90 5,866.15 67.50 3,470.00 1,398.39 13,778.04 1,674.57 2,577.38 411.08 1,186.25 1,162.50 902.50 1.351.15 8,992.00 1,768.00 498.90 50.00 516.83 -30.00 1,190.60 632.71 200.00 244.20 506.94 515.48 5,933.65 3,470.00 1,398.39 13,778.04 4,251.95 411.08 3,251.25 1,351.15 8,992.00 1,768.00 3,059.04 244.20 506.94 Page:10 apChkLst 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM Final Check List CITY OF TEMECULA Page: 11 Bank: union UNION BANK (Continued) Check # Date Vendor Description Amount Paid Check Total 209730 8/4/2022 022837 QUADIENT FINANCE USA INC Postage for meter: Tern Sheriff 250.00 250.00 209731 8/4/2022 020127 QUINN COMPANY GENERATOR MAINT: LIBRARY: PW 377.50 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT: Cll 377.50 GENERATOR PREVENTATIVE MAINT: FO 377.50 GENERATOR MAINT: PW 377.50 GENERATOR MAINT: CRC: PW 377.50 1,887.50 209732 8/4/2022 008651 R M F CONTRACTING INC, DBA LED LIGHTS: RONALD REAGAN PK: 13,750.00 13,750.00 R&M ELECTRICAL CONTRA PW 209733 8/4/2022 000418 RIVERSIDE CO CLERK AND, REPORT SVC: CIP: PW 2,698.00 2,698.00 RECORDER 209734 8/4/2022 000411 RIVERSIDE CO FLOOD 5/22 ENCROACH PERMIT: MURR CRK 1,136.13 1,136.13 CONTROLAND, WATER CHANNEL CONSERVATION DIST 209735 8/4/2022 022715 RIVERSIDE CO PUBLIC JUN EMERG RADIO RENTALS: TCSD 143.64 SAFETY, ENTERPRISE COMMUNICATION MAY EMERG RADIO RENTALS: TCSD 143.64 287.28 209736 8/4/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 06/02-06/30: LAW ENFORCEMENT 2,710,664.96 2,710,664.96 DEPT 209737 8/4/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS 04/01-06/30 TOWING SRVCS: POLICE 2,189.00 2,189.00 DEPT 209738 8/4/2022 000406 RIVERSIDE CO SHERIFFS REGISTRATIONANNUALAWARD: 300.00 300.00 DEPT POLICE DEPT 209739 8/4/2022 001365 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF, APR-JUN '22 VECTOR CNTRL SVC: 9,550.32 9,550.32 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH CODE ENF DEPT 209740 8/4/2022 001097 ROADLINE PRODUCTS INC TRAFFIC SUPPLIES: STREETS: PW 2,571.66 2,571.66 209741 8/4/2022 022994 EMPLOYEE #00625 REIMB: UNIFORMS: BLDG & SAFETY 143.32 143.32 209742 8/4/2022 017699 SARNOWSKI SHAWNA M PHOTOGRAPHY SERVICES: TVM: TCS 170.00 PRESTON PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: ART OFF THE W/ 220.00 PHOTOGRAPHY SVCS: MEALS FROG: T( 175.00 565.00 209743 8/4/2022 022929 SCP DISTRIBUTORS LLC, DBA BACKBOARD SUPPLIES: TCSD 4,138.02 4,138.02 LINCOLN AQUATICS Page:11 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 12 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209744 8/4/2022 000519 SOUTH COUNTY PEST CONTROL INC (Continued) Description PEST CONTROL SVCS: NICOLAS RD PK PEST CONTROL SVCS: RRSP PEST CONTROL SVCS: PAUBA RIDGE PH PEST CONTROL SVCS: MRC: PW PEST CONTROL SVCS: SEVERAL PARKS PEST CONTROL SVCS: N GEN KEARNY I 209745 8/4/2022 000293 STADIUM PIZZA INC REFRESHMENTS: TCSD/WORKFORCE RFRSHMNTS: MEDICAL CAREERS: WOR 209746 8/4/2022 007762 STANDARD INSURANCE BASIC LIFE INSURANCE PAYMENT COMPANY 209747 8/4/2022 012723 STANDARD INSURANCE VOLUNTARY SUPP LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY PAYMENT 209748 8/4/2022 008337 STAPLES BUSINESS CREDIT MISC OFC SUPPLIES: TCSD MISC OFC SUPPLIES: ADMIN: TCSD 209749 8/4/2022 015648 STEIN AN DREW, DBA PARKINK MISC SUPPLIES: TCSD 209750 8/4/2022 022849 STRIA LLC DOCUSIGN TIME & MATERIALS: FINANCE DOCUSIGN TIME & MATERIALS: FINANCI 209751 8/4/2022 001547 TEAMSTERS LOCAL 911 UNION MEMBERSHIP DUES PAYMENT 209752 8/4/2022 000306 TEMECULA VALLEY PIPE & IRRIGATION & PLUMB SUPP: PARKS: SUPPLY PW 209753 8/4/2022 000919 TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED FY21/22 HOMEWORK CNTR: LIBRARY SCHOOL, DISTRICT 209754 8/4/2022 022939 TRANSPORTATION CHARTER TRANSPORTATION FOR SDC: CRD: SRVS TCSD 209755 8/4/2022 022046 TURBOSCAPE INC PLAYGROUND FIBER: CITY PARKS 209756 8/4/2022 010046 TV CONVENTION &VISITORS MAY'22 BUS. IMPRV DISTRICT BUREAU, DBA VISIT TEMECULA ASMNTS VALLEY 209757 8/4/2022 011659 ULINE INC MISC EVENT SUPPLIES: MRC: TCSD 209758 8/4/2022 020963 UPTOWN TEMECULAAUTO JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: TCSD SPA LLC JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: CODE E JUN VEHICLE DETAILING SVCS: B&S Amount Paid Check Total 94.00 282.00 94.00 70.00 493.00 188.00 100.79 129.51 10,557.33 1,215.38 1,453.74 28.58 1,495.86 2,012.50 393.75 4,544.96 4,061.70 2,880.10 4,421.28 41,877.00 187.782.31 1,470.94 15.00 20.00 55.00 1,221.00 230.30 10,557.33 1,215.38 1,482.32 1,495.86 2,406.25 4,544.96 4,061.70 2,880.10 4,421.28 41,877.00 187.782.31 1,470.94 90.00 Page:12 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 13 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA Bank: union UNION BANK Check # Date Vendor 209759 8/4/2022 014486 VERIZON WIRELESS 209760 8/4/2022 001890 VORTEX INDUSTRIES INC 209761 8/4/2022 020275 WALLACE & ASSOC CONSULTING LLC, ANSER ADVISORY MNGMT LLC 209762 8/4/2022 020193 WHITE CAP LP 209763 8/4/2022 022965 X CHAIR LLC (Continued) Description Amount Paid Check Total 6/11-7/10 TASK FORCE TABLETS 590.02 590.02 POLICE INSTALL ADA DOOR OPERATOR: TPL 5,747.42 5,747.42 APR CONSTRUCTION MGMT SVCS: 11,442.00 11,442.00 PW18-05 MISC SUPPLIES: STREET MAINT: PW 546.31 MISC SUPPLIES: IWTCM: PW 167.42 713.73 OFFICE FURNITURE: TCSD 3,267.40 3,267.40 Grand total for UNION BANK: 4,869,914.69 Page:13 apChkLst Final Check List Page: 14 08/04/2022 5:02:27PM CITY OF TEMECULA 176 checks in this report. Grand Total All Checks: 4,869,914.69 Page:14 Item No. 4 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2022 and May 31, 2022 PREPARED BY: Jordan Snider, Senior Accountant RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve and file the City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2022 and May 31, 2022. BACKGROUND: Government Code Sections 53646 and 41004 require reports to the City Council regarding the City's investment portfolio, receipts, and disbursements respectively. Adequate funds will be available to meet budgeted and actual expenditures of the City for the next six months. Current market values are derived from the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) reports, Union Bank of California trust and custody statements, and from US Bank trust statements. Attached is the City Treasurer's Report that provides this information. The City's investment portfolio is in compliance with the statement of investment policy and Government Code Sections 53601 and 53635 as of as of April 30, 2022 and May 31, 2022. FISCAL IMPACT: None ATTACHMENTS: 1. City Treasurer's Report as of April 30, 2022 2. City Treasurer's Report as of May 31, 2022 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary April 30, 2022 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 33,392,170.40 33,392,170.40 33,392,170.40 17.51 1 1 0.190 0.193 Retention Escrow Account 652,031.46 652,031.46 652,031.46 0.34 1 1 0.062 0.063 Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Trust Accounts 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 9.12 1 1 1.509 1.530 Local Agency Investment Funds 119,212,530.98 117,871,811.78 119,212,530.98 62.53 1 1 0.269 0.273 Federal Agency Callable Securities 17,000,000.00 15,841,500.00 16,997,500.00 8.92 1,590 1,264 0.723 0.733 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3,000,000.00 2,908,700.00 3,000,000.00 1.57 1,278 686 0.999 1.013 190,653,336.77 188,062,817.57 190,650,836.77 100.00% 163 124 0.420 0.425 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings 7,593,317.45 198,246,654.22 April 30 Month Ending 7,593,317.45 7,593,317.45 195,656,135.02 Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 66,567.89 2,285,234.90 Average Daily Balance 201,897,616.44 188,424,170.25 Effective Rate of Return 0.40% 1.46% 198,244,154.22 1 1 0.000 0.000 3 124 0.420 0.425 Reporting period 04/01/2022-04/3012022 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2022 Page 1 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 233358001-6 01-2 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 5,668.06 5,668.06 5,668.06 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358006-6 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 503,249.96 503,249.96 503,249.96 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358000-6 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 202,423.68 202,423.68 202,423.68 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213009-6 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213008-6 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 517.36 517.36 517.36 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213006-6 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 741,094.49 741,094.49 741,094.49 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741002-6 03-03 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 122,502.16 122,502.16 122,502.16 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741008-6 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 194,149.77 194,149.77 194,149.77 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741006-6 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 296.92 296.92 296.92 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741000-6 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 797,726.20 797,726.20 797,726.20 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164742002-6 03-06 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 26,018.66 26,018.66 26,018.66 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164742000-6 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 120,972.12 120,972.12 120,972.12 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462007-6 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462002--6 03-1 BOND FD First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 2,591.64 2,591.64 2,591.64 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462009-6 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462006-6 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,217.86 17,217.86 17,217.86 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462000-6 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 365,750.37 365,750.37 365,750.37 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94669921-6 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 94669911-6 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669917-6 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-6 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669000-6 03-1 SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213002-6 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 227.06 227.06 227.06 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213000-6 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 299,431.78 299,431.78 299,431.78 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 94686001-6 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 94686005-6 03-4PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.070 0.069 0.070 1 94686000-6 03-4RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.050 0.049 0.050 1 94686006-6 03-4RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 276213022-6 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 966.04 966.04 966.04 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213023-6 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 276213029-6 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213028-6 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,724,802.42 6,724,802.42 6,724,802.42 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213026-6 16-01RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3,153,631.98 3,153,631.98 3,153,631.98 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 276213020-6 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 988,213.72 988,213.72 988,213.72 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848001-6 2017A&B INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 11.62 11.62 11.62 0.170 0.168 0.170 1 218848008-6 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,961.37 17,961.37 17,961.37 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2022 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 218848013-2 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848000-6 2017B DS First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,514,079.76 1,514,079.76 1,514,079.76 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848002-6 2017B PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 990.94 990.94 990.94 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 218848009-6 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,879,718.81 6,879,718.81 6,879,718.81 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 233358009-6 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-6 RDA-021NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-6 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-6 RDA-06AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA071NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDA07PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDA07RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA10INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343001-6 RDA10PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA10RSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2022 Page 3 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate YTM 360 YTM Days to Maturity 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03-1bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 8,166,758.92 8,166,758.92 8,166,758.92 0.221 0.218 0.221 1 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 306,997.72 306,997.72 306,997.72 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 817,134.73 817,134.73 817,134.73 0.221 0.218 0.221 1 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,420,800.88 1,420,800.88 1,420,800.88 0.221 0.218 0.221 1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK 263.40 263.40 263.40 0.000 0.000 1 164742006-0 03-06 Cash USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 Subtotal and Average 31,971,791.22 33,392,170.40 33,392,170.40 33,392,170.40 0.190 0.193 1 Retention Escrow Account NOBEL COMPANY 3354 Banner Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.150 0.148 0.150 1 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 652,031.46 652,031.46 652,031.46 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 Subtotal and Average 652,252.73 652,031.46 652,031.46 652,031.46 0.062 0.063 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2021 233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2021 Subtotal and Average 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2022 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Trust Accounts 6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 1.530 1.509 1.530 1 Subtotal and Average 18,417,706.67 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 17,396,601.93 1.509 1.530 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 69,238,401.88 68,459,714.82 69,238,401.88 0.206 0.203 0.206 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,894.75 1,873.44 1,894.75 0.365 0.360 0.365 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 49,972,234.35 49,410,223.52 49,972,234.35 0.365 0.360 0.365 1 Subtotal and Average 122,994,681.99 119,212,530.98 117,871,811.78 119,212,530.98 0.269 0.273 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3133EMQGO 01259 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/10/2021 1,000,000.00 929,050.00 1,000,000.00 0.320 0.316 0.320 1,016 02/10/2025 3133EMK92 01265 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/23/2021 1,000,000.00 925,870.00 1,000,000.00 0.580 0.572 0.580 1,149 06/23/2025 3133EMN57 01266 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/28/2021 1,000,000.00 955,720.00 1,000,000.00 0.440 0.434 0.440 789 06/28/2024 3133EMP22 01267 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/30/2021 1,000,000.00 925,380.00 1,000,000.00 0.910 0.898 0.910 1,521 06/30/2026 3133ENAP5 01273 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/14/2021 1,000,000.00 929,140.00 1,000,000.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1,262 10/14/2025 313OAKQ41 01258 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 1,000,000.00 920,680.00 1,000,000.00 0.520 0.513 0.520 1,368 01/28/2026 3130ALEU4 01260 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2021 1,000,000.00 939,240.00 1,000,000.00 0.350 0.345 0.350 939 11/25/2024 3130ALWV2 01261 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/21/2021 1,000,000.00 938,620.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 1.011 1.025 1,451 04/21/2026 3130AM2V3 01262 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/29/2021 1,000,000.00 942,060.00 1,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 1,094 04/29/2025 3130AMNMO 01263 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/2021 1,000,000.00 933,800.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,487 05/27/2026 3130AMM90 01264 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/10/2021 1,000,000.00 937,040.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 1.973 2.000 1,501 06/10/2026 3130AN4N7 01268 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/14/2021 1,000,000.00 932,140.00 1,000,000.00 0.720 0.710 0.720 1,170 07/14/2025 3130ANAZ3 01269 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/28/2021 1,000,000.00 936,440.00 1,000,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 1,093 04/28/2025 3130AP3M5 01270 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/28/2021 1,000,000.00 934,520.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 0.550 1,062 03/28/2025 3134GXJL9 01257 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 1,000,000.00 921,450.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,339 12/30/2025 3130APBV6 01271 Union Bank 10/07/2021 1,000,000.00 925,120.00 999,000.00 1.000 1.007 1.021 1,620 10/07/2026 3130APAM7 01272 Union Bank 10/14/2021 1,000,000.00 915,230.00 998,500.00 0.900 0.918 0.931 1,627 10/14/2026 Subtotal and Average 16,997,500.00 17,000,000.00 15,841,500.00 16,997,500.00 0.723 0.733 1,264 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133ELMA9 01254 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/07/2020 1,000,000.00 988,590.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 463 08/07/2023 3133ELTU8 01256 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/18/2020 1,000,000.00 970,960.00 1,000,000.00 0.920 0.907 0.920 687 03/18/2024 3133ENCA6 01274 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/25/2021 1,000,000.00 949,150.00 1,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 908 10/25/2024 Subtotal and Average 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,908,700.00 3,000,000.00 0.999 1.013 686 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments April 30, 2022 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Total and Average 201,897,616.44 190,653,336.77 188,062,817.57 190,650,836.77 0.420 0.425 124 Page 5 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 NIL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash April 30, 2022 Page 6 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 WORKERS BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2021 9,969.53 9,969.53 9,969.53 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2021 3,911.00 3,911.00 3,911.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 7,549,993.78 7,549,993.78 7,549,993.78 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2021 29,443.14 29,443.14 29,443.14 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 201,897, 616.44 0 198,246,654.22 195,656,135.02 198,244,154.22 0.420 0.425 124 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 09:26 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 09:26 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through April 2022 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 62,751,360.49 $ 6,516,836.89 $ 9,880,450.98 $ 59,387,746.40 002 MEASURE S FUND 26,741,096.68 2,698,002.58 8,986.13 29,430,113.13 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 1,913,946.65 387,525.23 - 2,301,471.88 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 3,041,150.10 3,530.16 929.46 3,043,750.80 103 STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND 4,919,924.25 5,468.31 1,503.67 4,923,888.89 106 UPTOWN TEMECULA NEW STREETS IN LIEU FEES 887,720.45 1,076.54 271.31 888,525.68 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 4,992,095.63 75,437.27 1,547.00 5,065,985.90 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 715,139.00 838.75 1,839.42 714,138.33 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 832,494.93 1,009.57 254.43 833,250.07 150 AB 2766 FUND 231,158.68 257.21 10,067.59 221,348.30 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 241,019.78 8,469.93 - 249,489.71 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 26,967.09 32.70 8.24 26,991.55 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1,886,047.53 2,300.32 15,643.18 1,872,704.67 170 MEASURE A FUND 9,763,056.08 1,219,402.88 193,755.60 10,788,703.36 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 3,617,865.64 221,367.94 894,543.43 2,944,690.15 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 904,539.39 1,070.95 23,693.35 881,916.99 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 539,746.20 1,481.23 12,420.04 528,807.39 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 27,235.75 33.02 8.32 27,260.45 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 427,823.28 2,837.19 44,017.85 386,642.62 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 615,698.58 4,048.96 39,558.85 580,188.69 198 PUBLIC ART 121,540.60 2,041.34 37.73 123,544.21 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 6,892,624.41 1,377,345.51 3,544,125.63 4,725,844.29 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 211,274.61 33.76 5.24 211,303.13 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 8,303,750.84 6,603.89 43.68 8,310,311.05 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,724,353.04 449.38 - 6,724,802.42 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,260,217.33 1,472.50 39,342.60 1,222,347.23 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,756,439.78 3,678.94 17,529.78 1,742,588.94 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 2,634,273.03 3,027.50 805.11 2,636,495.42 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,127,278.68 2,666.48 310,658.63 1,819,286.53 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 2,043,266.06 2,323.92 16,613.71 2,028,976.27 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 36,216.67 1,501.49 18,911.33 18,806.83 335 CENTRAL SERVICES 346,216.11 399.82 24,080.03 322,535.90 340 FACILITIES 755,291.35 865.14 102,159.50 653,996.99 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND 294,290.33 5,183.88 77,727.21 221,747.00 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 3,454,283.90 5,896,370.88 2,451,893.41 6,898,761.37 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST 6,142,571.29 1,033.15 4,381,916.04 1,761,688.40 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 94,576.80 114.70 28.91 94,662.59 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 1,191,263.04 669.06 147.36 1,191,784.74 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,889,248.78 790.27 240.17 1,889,798.88 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 4,953.22 6.00 1.51 4,957.71 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,382,356.06 1,430.21 101.83 2,383,684.44 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 490,376.35 327.98 11.87 490,692.46 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,067,109.98 175.63 10.07 1,067,275.54 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 4,712,763.85 1,291.30 174.91 4,713,880.24 479 CFD 19-01 CYPRESS RIDGE (2,295.00) - - (2,295.00) 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 12,325.63 13.58 3,075.92 9,263.29 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 116,952.12 140.05 2,270.59 114,821.58 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 47,252.07 56.59 2,354.88 44,953.78 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 4,652.19 5.34 576.00 4,081.53 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 31,475.58 36.21 2,994.95 28,516.84 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 42,455.59 50.09 1,477.03 41,028.65 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 10,549.61 12.05 1,153.61 9,408.05 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 107,413.68 119.03 19,741.77 87,790.94 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 31,959.32 38.57 176.10 31,821.79 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 13,812.46 16.45 742.93 13,085.98 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3,998.72 4.64 327.55 3,675.81 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 106,302.45 126.20 6,437.36 99,991.29 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 28,473.24 33.51 2,242.46 26,264.29 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 12,484.98 14.31 1,335.02 11,164.27 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 12,581.67 14.81 734.72 11,861.76 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 70,590.68 84.56 1,229.49 69,445.75 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2,242.34 2.61 219.02 2,025.93 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 70,611.32 81.12 6,815.62 63,876.82 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 80,356.76 97.68 4,142.26 76,312.18 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 222,837.27 265.77 9,180.66 213,922.38 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 166,260.84 205.09 16,958.79 149,507.14 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 10,485.28 12.46 450.87 10,046.87 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 24,792.74 29.82 319.35 24,503.21 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 39,112.11 44.09 7,879.40 31,276.80 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 66,219.89 78.84 2,875.51 63,423.22 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1,863.85 2.06 355.78 1,510.13 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 9,112.73 10.47 968.84 8,154.36 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 628,575.13 751.80 19,315.06 610,011.87 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 6,827.12 7.94 158.16 6,676.90 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 35,984.50 43.64 11.00 36,017.14 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND $ 18,452,917.18 - 1,056,315.25 $ 17,396,601.93 Grand Total: $ 200,481,806.34 $ 18,463,229.74 $ 23,288,901.06 $ 195,656,135.02 Journal Entries completed after March's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts I Disbursements columns. Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Summary May 31, 2022 City of Temecula 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6430 Par Market Book % of Days to YTM YTM Investments Value Value Value Portfolio Term Maturity 360 Equiv. 365 Equiv. Managed Pool Accounts 33,105,023.59 33,105,023.59 33,105,023.59 17.16 1 1 0.505 0.512 Retention Escrow Account 652,763.94 652,763.94 652,763.94 0.34 1 1 0.062 0.063 Letter of Credit 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1 1 0.000 0.000 Trust Accounts 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 9.03 1 1 1.509 1.530 Local Agency Investment Funds 121,712,530.98 120,343,695.63 121,712,530.98 63.10 1 1 0.268 0.271 Federal Agency Callable Securities 17,000,000.00 15,945,770.00 16,997,500.00 8.81 1,590 1,233 0.723 0.733 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3,000,000.00 2,921,090.00 3,000,000.00 1.56 1,278 655 0.999 1.013 192,893,456.55 190,391,481.20 192,890,956.55 100.00% 161 120 0.471 0.478 Investments Cash Passbook/Checking (not included in yield calculations) Total Cash and Investments Total Earnings 24, 399,127.37 217,292,583.92 May 31 Month Ending 24,399,127.37 214,790,608.57 Fiscal Year To Date Current Year 71,964.08 2,357,198.96 Average Daily Balance 198,617,993.59 189,367,479.27 Effective Rate of Return 0.43% 1.36% 24, 399,127.37 217,290,083.92 1 1 0.000 0.000 Reporting period 05/01/2022-05/31/2022 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 NLI CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 PM (PRF_PM1) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2022 Page 1 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 233358001-6 01-2 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 5,668.85 5,668.85 5,668.85 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 233358006-6 01-2 REF RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 503,320.20 503,320.20 503,320.20 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 233358000-6 01-2 REF ST First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 202,451.93 202,451.93 202,451.93 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213009-6 03-02 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213008-6 03-02 IMPR First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 517.43 517.43 517.43 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213006-6 03-02 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 741,197.92 741,197.92 741,197.92 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 164741002-6 03-03 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 122,519.26 122,519.26 122,519.26 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 164741008-6 03-03IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 194,176.87 194,176.87 194,176.87 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 164741006-6 03-03RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 296.92 296.92 296.92 0.180 0.178 0.180 1 164741000-6 03-03SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 797,837.54 797,837.54 797,837.54 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 164742002-6 03-06 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 26,022.29 26,022.29 26,022.29 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 164742000-6 03-06SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 120,989.00 120,989.00 120,989.00 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 229462007-6 03-1 2012 RF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462002--6 03-1 BOND FD First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 2,592.00 2,592.00 2,592.00 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 229462009-6 03-1 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462006-6 03-1 RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,220.26 17,220.26 17,220.26 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 229462000-6 03-1 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 365,801.42 365,801.42 365,801.42 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 94669921-6 03-1ACQ11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 94669911-6 03-1ACQA11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669917-6 03-1 RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669916-6 03-1 RESB11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669000-6 03-1 SPTAX11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213002-6 03-2 REFU First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 227.09 227.09 227.09 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213000-6 03-2 SPEC First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 299,473.57 299,473.57 299,473.57 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 94686001-6 03-4ADMIN11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 94686005-6 03-4PREP11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.070 0.069 0.070 1 94686000-6 03-4RED11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.050 0.049 0.050 1 94686006-6 03-4RES11 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.060 0.059 0.060 1 276213022-6 16-01 BOND F First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 966.17 966.17 966.17 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213023-6 16-01 CAPINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.870 0.858 0.870 1 276213029-6 16-01 COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 276213028-6 16-01 IMP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,725,741.00 6,725,741.00 6,725,741.00 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213026-6 16-01RESERV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 3,154,072.11 3,154,072.11 3,154,072.11 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 276213020-6 16-01 SPECF First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 988,351.65 988,351.65 988,351.65 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 218848001-6 2017A&B INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 11.62 11.62 11.62 0.600 0.592 0.600 1 218848008-6 2017ABPRIORP First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 17,963.88 17,963.88 17,963.88 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Report Ver. 7.3.6.1 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2022 Page 2 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 218848013-2 2017B COI First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848000-6 2017B DS First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 1,514,094.82 1,514,094.82 1,514,094.82 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 218848002-6 2017B PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 991.08 991.08 991.08 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 218848009-6 2017B_PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 6,590,562.97 6,590,562.97 6,590,562.97 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 233358009-6 233358009-6 First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-6 RDA-021NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434161-6 RDA-02PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886000-6 RDA-06AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886001-6 RDA06APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886010-6 RDA06BINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886011-6 RDA06BPRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.680 0.671 0.680 1 107886016-6 RDA06BRES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886020-6 RDA071NT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 107886021-6 RDA07PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.930 0.917 0.930 1 107886028-6 RDA07PROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 107886026-6 RDA07RES First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.940 0.927 0.940 1 136343008-6 RDA10APROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343018-6 RDA10BPROJ First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343000-6 RDA10INT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343001-6 RDA10PRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 136343006-6 RDA10RSRV First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161000-6 RDA11AINT First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 146161001-6 RDA11APRIN First Amer Govt Oblig Fund Cl 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669902-3 03-1 BOND3 First American Treasury 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94434160-1 RDA 02 INT1 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 94434161-2 RDA 02 PRIN2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 136343018-2 RDA 10B CIP2 First American Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.010 0.010 0.010 1 146161008-3 RDA11APROJ Federated Institutional Tax Fr 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1 146161006-3 RDA11ARSRV Federated Institutional Tax Fr 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669921-5 03-01 ACQ11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669911-5 03-01 ACQA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-5 03-01 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94669906-5 03-01 RESA11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 0.001 0.001 1 94669916-5 03-01 RESB11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669000-5 03-01SPTAX11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 164742006-5 03-06 RES Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 Portfolio TEME NL! CP PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2022 Page 3 CUSIP Investment # Average Issuer Balance Purchase Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Stated Rate YTM 360 YTM Days to Maturity 365 Maturity Date Managed Pool Accounts 164742000-5 03-06 SPEC Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669902-5 03-1bond fd Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686001-5 03-4 ADMIN11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94686005-5 03-4 PREP11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 94686006-5 03-4 RES11 Federated Tax Free Obligations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.250 0.247 0.250 1 94669917-1 03-01-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 276213008-1 03-02 IMP CA Local Agency Investment Fun 8,166,758.92 8,166,758.92 8,166,758.92 0.221 0.218 0.221 1 164742006-1 03-06 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 306,997.77 306,997.77 306,997.77 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 229462007-1 03-1 2012 RE CA Local Agency Investment Fun 817,134.73 817,134.73 817,134.73 0.221 0.218 0.221 1 94669911-1 03-1 ACQ A2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 94669921-1 03-1 ACQ B2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 744727011-1 03-3 ACQ 2 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 164741006-1 0303-1 RES CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,420,800.92 1,420,800.92 1,420,800.92 0.620 0.612 0.620 1 107886028-1 RDA 07 PRO-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 107886026-1 RDA 07 RES-1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 136343018-1 RDA 10B CIP1 CA Local Agency Investment Fun 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.339 0.334 0.339 1 229462020-0 03-01 CASH USBANK 263.40 263.40 263.40 0.000 0.000 1 164742006-0 03-06 Cash USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 233358050-1 01-2 SPECESC U.S. Treasury 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.360 0.355 0.360 1 Subtotal and Average 33,142,362.14 33,105,023.59 33,105,023.59 33,105,023.59 0.505 0.512 1 Retention Escrow Account NOBEL COMPANY 3354 Banner Bank 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.150 0.148 0.150 1 218848050-0 2002 ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848060-0 2006AESCRO USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848070-0 2006BESCRO USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 218848080-0 2007ESCROW USBANK 07/01/2021 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 1 229462020-2 03-01 ESCROW U.S. Treasury 652,763.94 652,763.94 652,763.94 0.063 0.062 0.063 1 Subtotal and Average 652,055.09 652,763.94 652,763.94 652,763.94 0.062 0.063 1 Letter of Credit 218848006-1 2017B RESER ASSURED GUARANTY MUNICIPAL COR 07/01/2021 233358006-1 01-2 REFRESI ASSURANCE CO BOND INSURANCE 07/01/2021 Subtotal and Average 2.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.000 0.000 1 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.000 0.000 1 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2022 Page 4 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to Maturity CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Date Trust Accounts 6746058700 PARS Pension US Bank Trust 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 1.530 1.509 1.530 1 Subtotal and Average 17,397,457.87 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 17,423,136.04 1.509 1.530 1 Local Agency Investment Funds SYSCITY CITY CA Local Agency Investment Fun 71,738,401.88 70,931,598.67 71,738,401.88 0.206 0.203 0.206 1 SYSRDA RDA CA Local Agency Investment Fun 1,894.75 1,873.44 1,894.75 0.365 0.360 0.365 1 SYSTCSD TCSD CA Local Agency Investment Fun 49,972,234.35 49,410,223.52 49,972,234.35 0.365 0.360 0.365 1 Subtotal and Average 119,293,176.14 121,712,530.98 120,343,695.63 121,712,530.98 0.268 0.271 1 Federal Agency Callable Securities 3133EMQGO 01259 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/10/2021 1,000,000.00 934,890.00 1,000,000.00 0.320 0.316 0.320 985 02/10/2025 3133EMK92 01265 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/23/2021 1,000,000.00 932,100.00 1,000,000.00 0.580 0.572 0.580 1,118 06/23/2025 3133EMN57 01266 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/28/2021 1,000,000.00 960,910.00 1,000,000.00 0.440 0.434 0.440 758 06/28/2024 3133EMP22 01267 Federal Farm Credit Bank 06/30/2021 1,000,000.00 931,740.00 1,000,000.00 0.910 0.898 0.910 1,490 06/30/2026 3133ENAP5 01273 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/14/2021 1,000,000.00 935,390.00 1,000,000.00 0.800 0.789 0.800 1,231 10/14/2025 313OAKQ41 01258 Federal Home Loan Bank 01/28/2021 1,000,000.00 926,720.00 1,000,000.00 0.520 0.513 0.520 1,337 01/28/2026 3130ALEU4 01260 Federal Home Loan Bank 02/25/2021 1,000,000.00 945,160.00 1,000,000.00 0.350 0.345 0.350 908 11/25/2024 3130ALWV2 01261 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/21/2021 1,000,000.00 945,070.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 1.011 1.025 1,420 04/21/2026 3130AM2V3 01262 Federal Home Loan Bank 04/29/2021 1,000,000.00 948,200.00 1,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 1,063 04/29/2025 3130AMNMO 01263 Federal Home Loan Bank 05/27/2021 1,000,000.00 939,620.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,456 05/27/2026 3130AMM90 01264 Federal Home Loan Bank 06/10/2021 1,000,000.00 944,370.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 1.973 2.000 1,470 06/10/2026 3130AN4N7 01268 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/14/2021 1,000,000.00 938,330.00 1,000,000.00 0.720 0.710 0.720 1,139 07/14/2025 3130ANAZ3 01269 Federal Home Loan Bank 07/28/2021 1,000,000.00 942,660.00 1,000,000.00 0.600 0.592 0.600 1,062 04/28/2025 3130AP3M5 01270 Federal Home Loan Bank 09/28/2021 1,000,000.00 940,820.00 1,000,000.00 0.550 0.542 0.550 1,031 03/28/2025 3134GXJL9 01257 Federal Home Loan Mtg Corp 12/30/2020 1,000,000.00 927,700.00 1,000,000.00 0.500 0.493 0.500 1,308 12/30/2025 3130APBV6 01271 Union Bank 10/07/2021 1,000,000.00 931,360.00 999,000.00 1.000 1.007 1.021 1,589 10/07/2026 3130APAM7 01272 Union Bank 10/14/2021 1,000,000.00 920,730.00 998,500.00 0.900 0.918 0.931 1,596 10/14/2026 Subtotal and Average 16,997,500.00 17,000,000.00 15,945,770.00 16,997,500.00 0.723 0.733 1,233 Federal Agency Bullet Securities 3133ELMA9 01254 Federal Farm Credit Bank 02/07/2020 1,000,000.00 990,900.00 1,000,000.00 1.420 1.401 1.420 432 08/07/2023 3133ELTU8 01256 Federal Farm Credit Bank 03/18/2020 1,000,000.00 975,460.00 1,000,000.00 0.920 0.907 0.920 656 03/18/2024 3133ENCA6 01274 Federal Farm Credit Bank 10/25/2021 1,000,000.00 954,730.00 1,000,000.00 0.700 0.690 0.700 877 10/25/2024 Subtotal and Average 3,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 2,921,090.00 3,000,000.00 0.999 1.013 655 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Investments May 31, 2022 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Total and Average 198,617,993.59 192,893,456.55 190,391,481.20 192,890,956.55 0.471 0.478 120 Page 5 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 NIL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Portfolio Managment Treasury Report Portfolio Management Portfolio Details - Cash May 31, 2022 Page 6 Average Purchase Stated YTM YTM Days to CUSIP Investment # Issuer Balance Date Par Value Market Value Book Value Rate 360 365 Maturity Passbook/Checking Accounts 1453718479 WORKERS BANK OF AMERICA MERRILL LYNC 07/01/2021 22,160.43 22,160.43 22,160.43 0.000 0.000 1 SYSPetty Cash Petty Cash City of Temecula 07/01/2021 3,911.00 3,911.00 3,911.00 0.000 0.000 1 SYSGen Ck Acct Gen Ck Acct Union Bank of California 24,358,284.37 24,358,284.37 24,358,284.37 0.000 0.000 1 SYSParking Ck PARKING CITA Union Bank of California 07/01/2021 14,771.57 14,771.57 14,771.57 0.000 0.000 1 Average Balance 0.00 Total Cash and Investments 198,617,993.59 0 217,292,583.92 214,790,608.57 217,290,083.92 0.471 0.478 120 Portfolio TEME Data Updated: SET_MTH: 08/09/2022 10:17 NL! CP Run Date: 08/09/2022 - 10:17 PM (PRF_PM2) 7.3.0 Cash and Investments Report CITY OF TEMECULA Through MAY 2022 Fund # Fund Name Beginning Balance Receipts Disbursements Fund Total 001 GENERAL FUND $ 59,387,746.40 $ 10,925,007.31 $ 6,449,101.31 $ 63,863,652.40 002 MEASURE S FUND 29,430,113.13 3,662,762.44 5,690.80 33,087,184.77 100 STATE GAS TAX FUND 2,301,471.88 221,442.85 - 2,522,914.73 102 RMRA-ROAD MAINTENANCE REHABILITATION ACT 3,043,750.80 182,460.30 554.79 3,225,656.31 103 STREETS MAINTENANCE FUND 4,923,888.89 - 846.73 4,923,042.16 105 NPDES - 1,942.85 0.33 1,942.52 106 UPTOWN TEMECULA NEW STREETS IN LIEU FEES 888,525.68 - 152.79 888,372.89 120 DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FUND 5,065,985.90 81,100.08 885.12 5,146,200.86 125 PEG PUBLIC EDUCATION & GOVERNMENT 714,138.33 - 122.81 714,015.52 145 TEMECULA ENERGY EFFICIENCY ASSET TEAM 833,250.07 143.29 833,106.78 150 AB 2766 FUND 221,348.30 - 38.06 221,310.24 160 SUPPLEMENTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT SERVICES 249,489.71 8,333.33 - 257,823.04 161 TEMECULA MAJOR CRIMES REWARD FUND 26,991.55 - 4.64 26,986.91 165 AFFORDABLE HOUSING 1,872,704.67 16,386.59 1,856,318.08 170 MEASURE A FUND 10,788,703.36 80,581.73 10,708,121.63 190 TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT 2,944,690.15 2,237,856.14 1,658,751.20 3,523,795.09 192 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "B" STREET LIGHTS 881,916.99 291,161.14 23,671.27 1,149,406.86 194 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "D" REFUSE/RECYCLING 528,807.39 4,040,597.83 7,275.81 4,562,129.41 195 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "R" STREET/ROAD MAINT 27,260.45 - 4.69 27,255.76 196 TCSD SERVICE LEVEL "L" LAKE PARK MAINT. 386,642.62 115,187.87 21,378.12 480,452.37 197 TEMECULA LIBRARY FUND 580,188.69 3,410.45 37,912.66 545,686.48 198 PUBLIC ART 123,544.21 1,904.14 21.57 125,426.78 210 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FUND 4,725,844.29 1,108,672.42 2,120,651.39 3,713,865.32 275 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK IMPROVEMENT FUND 211,303.13 27.10 2.95 211,327.28 277 CFD-RORIPAUGH 8,310,311.05 0.07 24.60 8,310,286.52 278 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 6,724,802.42 938.58 - 6,725,741.00 300 INSURANCE FUND 1,222,347.23 - 38,028.72 1,184,318.51 305 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 1,742,588.94 20,000.00 36,889.04 1,725,699.90 310 VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FUND 2,636,495.42 - 453.38 2,636,042.04 320 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,819,286.53 0.27 446,313.01 1,372,973.79 325 TECHNOLOGY REPLACEMENT FUND 2,028,976.27 - 348.91 2,028,627.36 330 CENTRAL SERVICES 18,806.83 24,525.04 (5,718.21) 335 CENTRAL SERVICES 322,535.90 - 54.48 322,481.42 340 FACILITIES 653,996.99 3.32 114,108.80 539,891.51 350 FACILITY REPLACEMENT FUND 221,747.00 - 5,037.27 216,709.73 380 SARDA DEBT SERVICE FUND 6,898,761.37 977.91 293,856.04 6,605,883.24 381 REDEVELOPMEN PROPERTY TAX TRUST 1,761,688.40 3,644,625.00 668.70 5,405,644.70 460 CFD 88-12 DEBT SERVICE FUND 94,662.59 - 16.28 94,646.31 472 CFD 01-2 HARVESTON A&B DEBT SERVICE 1,191,784.74 452,336.21 1,839.86 1,642,281.09 473 CFD 03-1 CROWNE HILL DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,889,798.88 372,278.00 1,749.34 2,260,327.54 474 AD 03-4 JOHN WARNER ROAD DEBT SERVICE 4,957.71 - 0.85 4,956.86 475 CFD 03-3 WOLF CREEK DEBT SERVICE FUND 2,383,684.44 869,139.18 26,546.08 3,226,277.54 476 CFD 03-6 HARVESTON 2 DEBT SERVICE FUND 490,692.46 139,657.83 1,709.80 628,640.49 477 CFD 03-02 RORIPAUGH DEBT SERVICE FUND 1,067,275.54 345,421.60 1,746.53 1,410,950.61 478 CFD-RORIPAUGH II 4,713,880.24 1,213,707.19 1,987.85 5,925,599.58 479 CFD 19-01 CYPRESS RIDGE (2,295.00) - 1,147.50 (3,442.50) 501 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 1 SADDLEWOOD 9,263.29 17,393.02 3,040.23 23,616.08 502 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 2 WINCHESTER CREEK 114,821.58 19,747.92 2,001.56 132,567.94 503 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 3 RANCHO HIGHLANDS 44,953.78 21,053.97 2,469.89 63,537.86 504 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 4 THE VINEYARDS 4,081.53 3,061.30 485.68 6,657.15 505 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 5 SIGNET SERIES 28,516.84 17,330.31 15,276.80 30,570.35 506 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 6 WOODCREST COUNTRY 41,028.65 12,255.16 8,737.40 44,546.41 507 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 7 RIDGEVIEW 9,408.05 6,990.95 1,220.62 15,178.38 508 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 8 VILLAGE GROVE 87,790.94 60,703.54 10,848.60 137,645.88 509 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 9 RANCHO SOLANA 31,821.79 2,277.00 393.14 33,705.65 510 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 10 MARTINIQUE 13,085.98 4,524.00 897.02 16,712.96 511 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 11 MEADOWVIEW 3,675.81 1,137.50 1,018.83 3,794.48 512 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 12 VINTAGE HILLS 99,991.29 43,541.90 6,564.17 136,969.02 513 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 13 PRESLEY DEVELOP 26,264.29 15,571.00 2,815.46 39,019.83 514 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 14 MORRISON HOMES 11,164.27 6,715.05 1,123.13 16,756.19 515 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 15 BARCLAY ESTATES 11,861.76 4,812.50 3,868.30 12,805.96 516 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 16 TRADEWINDS 69,445.75 18,025.00 1,405.50 86,065.25 517 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 17 MONTE VISTA 2,025.93 943.00 172.75 2,796.18 518 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 18 TEMEKU HILLS 63,876.82 41,028.26 5,764.63 99,140.45 519 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 19 CHANTEMAR 76,312.18 23,737.50 3,940.78 96,108.90 520 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 20 CROWNE HILL 213,922.38 82,961.78 10,136.88 286,747.28 521 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 21 VAIL RANCH 149,507.14 104,288.85 15,258.71 238,537.28 522 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 22 SUTTON PLACE 10,046.87 2,030.00 321.57 11,755.30 523 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 23 PHEASENT RUN 24,503.21 3,890.00 384.96 28,008.25 524 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 24 HARVESTON 31,276.80 72,483.32 9,190.98 94,569.14 525 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 25 SERENA HILLS 63,423.22 20,199.02 3,612.12 80,010.12 526 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 26 GALLERYTRADITION 1,510.13 810.00 173.70 2,146.43 527 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 27 AVONDALE 8,154.36 4,165.00 824.18 11,495.18 528 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 28 WOLF CREEK 610,011.87 107,140.65 20,600.67 696,551.85 529 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 29 GALLERY PORTRAIT 6,676.90 2,124.67 168.96 8,632.61 530 SERVICE LEVEL"C"ZONE 30 FUTURE ZONES 36,017.14 - 6.19 36,010.95 701 PENSION RATE STABILIZATION FUND $ 17,396,601.93 53,518.22 26,984.11 $ 17,423,136.04 Grand Total: $ 195,656,135.02 $ 30,715,411.80 $ 11,580,938.25 $ 214,790,608.57 Journal Entries completed after April's Treasurer's Report was issued are reflected in the Receipts I Disbursements columns. Item No. 5 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Amend the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2023-27 for Various Projects PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023-27 FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS 2. Approve an appropriation and corresponding fund transfer of $251,940 from Measure S for the projects noted below, including the cancellation of the Utility Undergrounding project; and 3. Approve an appropriation and corresponding reimbursement revenue of $53,500 from Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for Project 735 — Murrieta Creek Improvements; and 4. Approve an appropriation and corresponding reimbursement revenue of $282,000 from Municipal Water District for Project 130 — Parks Improvement Program; and 5. Approve an appropriation and corresponding fund transfer of $630,894 from CDBG-CV2 to establish a new project for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area. BACKGROUND: On June 14, 2022, the City Council adopted the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-27. Since the adoption of the CIP Budget, staff received several requests for additional funds and/or additional scope of work related to several projects. In addition, new information from Southern California Edison (SCE) necessitates cancelling one of the approved projects. These changes have made it necessary to amend the CIP Budget. This amendment to the CIP Budget will cover the following changes: 1- City Facilities Rehabilitation — Appropriate an additional $250,000 to Fiscal Year 2022- 23 from Measure S. The additional amount will be used to construct the tenant improvements at the Old Town Police Substation to accommodate the Metro Team. 2- Murrieta Creek Improvements — Add $53,500 to the amount to be reimbursed in Fiscal Year 2022-23. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) will reimburse this amount to the City for the reconstruction of the storm drain on Pujol Street, just south of the Temecula Help Center. 3- Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension - Appropriate an additional $160,000 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Measures S. The project has been delayed significantly due to material supply chain issues. The additional appropriation is necessary to administer the project to completion. 4- Utility Undergrounding — Main Street and Vicinity — This project will be cancelled. Southern California Edison (SCE) has informed the City that it cannot use the City's balance in the California Public Utility's Commission (CPUC) Rule 20A program as the City was intending to do. Since this project was slated to be funded with Rule 20A funds and Measure S, cancelling the project will return $658,060 to Measure S Fund Balance. 5- Parks Improvement Program - Add $282,000 to the amount to be reimbursed in Fiscal Year 2022-23. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) will reimburse this amount to the City for turf replacement. 6- Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park - Appropriate an additional $500,000 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Measures S. The additional amount is necessary to complete the project. 7- Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area — This is a new project. Appropriate $630,894 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Community Development Block Grant Corona Virus (CDBG-CV2) funds. This amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and all its elements. FISCAL IMPACT: The net result of this amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-27 is an appropriation increase from Measure S in the amount of $251,940. Projects that are part of this amendment without an impact to Measure S and other City funds are funded with external sources; either reimbursements to the City or a direct grant. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Amended CIP Budget Sheets 3. CIP Budget Amendment Summary RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA TO AMEND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP) BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEARS 2023-27 FOR VARIOUS PROJECTS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council finds, determines, and declares that: A. On June 14, 2022, the City Council adopted the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-27. B. Since the adoption of the CIP Budget, staff received several requests for additional funds and/or additional scope of work related to several projects. C. New information from Southern California Edison (SCE) necessitates cancelling the Utility Undergrounding — Main Street and Vicinity project. D. These changes have made it necessary to amend the CIP Budget for City Facilities Rehabilitation, Murrieta Creek Improvements, Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension, Parks Improvement Program, and Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park projects. E. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) as amended by this Resolution is consistent with the City of Temecula General Plan and each element thereof. Section 2. Amendment of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) A. The Capital Improvement Program (CIP) for Fiscal Years 2023-27 is hereby amended as follows: 1) City Facilities Rehabilitation — Appropriate an additional $250,000 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Measures "S". The additional amount will be used to construct the tenant improvements at the Old Town Police Substation to accommodate the Metro Team. 2) Murrieta Creek Improvements — Add $53,500 to the amount to be reimbursed in Fiscal Year 2022-23. Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (RCFC&WCD) will reimburse this amount to the City for the reconstruction of the storm drain on Pujol Street, just south of the Temecula Help Center. 3) Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension - Appropriate an additional $160,000 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Measure "S". The project has been delayed significantly due to material supply chain issues. The additional appropriation is necessary to administer the project to completion. 4) Utility Undergrounding — Main Street and Vicinity — This project will be cancelled. Southern California Edison (SCE) has informed the City that it cannot use the City's balance in the California Public Utility's Commission (CPUC) Rule 20A program as the City was intending to do. Since this project was slated to be funded with Rule 20A funds and Measure "S", cancelling the project will return $658,060 to Measure "S" Fund Balance. 5) Parks Improvement Program - Add $282,000 to the amount to be reimbursed in Fiscal Year 2022-23. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) will reimburse this amount to the City for turf replacement. 6) Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park - Appropriate an additional $500,000 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Measures "S". The additional amount is necessary to complete the project. 7) Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area — This is a new project. Appropriate $630,894 to Fiscal Year 2022-23 from Community Development Block Grant Corona Virus (CDBG-CV2) funds. B. The net result of this amendment to the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Years 2023-27 is an appropriation increase from Measure "S" in the amount of $251,940. This amount accounts for the additional requested appropriation of $910,000 and the proposed credit of $658,060. C. Projects that are part of this amendment without an impact to Measure "S" and other City funds are funded with external sources, either reimbursements to the City or a direct grant. Section 3. The City Clerk shall certify the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk ANk The n' S,M!hP.-c:;:'iIn. rniF CITY FACILITIES REHABILITATION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation projects at City owned and operated facilities such as the Pat Birdsall Sports Park Concessionaire Building, Old Town Parking Garage, Old Town Theater, History Museum, Old Town Police Substation, CRC Amphitheater, Temecula Elementary School pool and locker room, and other various facilities. The rehabilitation projects could include, but are not limited to, parking lot rehabilitation and light replacements, heating ventilation and air conditioner (HVAC) upgrades, roof repairs, carpet and flooring replacement, cabinet re- facing/replacement, concrete repairs, replacement of fencing, repair of swimming pools, and tenant improvements at the Old Town Police Substation to accommodate the Metro Team. Benefit: This project minimizes emergency repair costs, prolongs the service life of facilities, and upgrades aging facility components. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitation projects are completed on an ongoing basis as funding becomes available. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.701 / Various Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Amended 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 158,660 50,000 208,660 Construction 2,484,210 404,769 750,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,388,980 Design & Environmental 46,026 50,000 96,026 Total Expenditures 2,688,897 504,769 750,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,693,666 Source of Funds: DIF-Corporate Facilities 250,000 250,000 Facilities Replacement Fund 743,666 450,000 750,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 5,693,666 General Fund 1,750,000 1,750,000 Total Funding 2,743,666 450,000 750,000 750,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 7,693,666 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Added $2&JOW to the FY2022123 appropriation to do the tenontimprovements at the Old Town Police Substa tion to accommodate the Metro Team 126 ANk Tf,F �•-.�r. r�' S:�u�I,Frn c:;::f::rni� MURRIETA CREEK IMPROVEMENTS Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project reflects the United States Army Corps of Engineers and Riverside County Flood Control improvements to the Murrieta Creek within the City limits. This project also includes the study, design, and construction of alternatives to reconfigure the existing Southside Parking Lot which has been impacted by the Riverside County Flood Control's acquisition of a portion of the parking lot. Lighting will be added to the trail on the east side of Murrieta Creek between First Street and Rancho California Road. Benefit: This project helps prevent flooding of Old Town Temecula. Core Value: A Safe and Prepared Community Project Status: The City has entered into a Cooperative Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control District to further the implementation of this project. Construction of Phase II, just south of Rancho California Road to south of First Street bridge is complete. Design for the Southside parking lot reconfiguration has begun and the City is working with the adjacent property owners to ensure that the new parking design will maximize the number of parking spaces. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.735 / PW15-07 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program Added $&tS 0 to the FY2022123 Reimbursements fund source for reconstruction of a storm drain to be reimbursed by RCFC Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2022-23 2021-22 Amended 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost Administration 58,609 78,518 137,128 Construction 7,198 752,251 53,500 812,949 Design & Environmental 192,754 32,904 225,657 Furnishings & Equipment 130,000 130,000 Total Expenditures i 258,561 993,673 53,500 1,305,734 Source of Funds: General Fund 135,858 135,858 Measure S 53,791 53,791 Reimbursements 857,585 5,000 53,500 916,085 TEAM 200,000 200,000 Total Funding i 1,047,234 205,000 53,500 1,305,734 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Construction of the Southside Parking Lot Reconfiguration will not occur until the Purchase and Sale Agreement with Riverside County Flood Control is executed and the proceeds are received. 2. Reimbursements include $887,836 from Riverside County Flood Control and $28,249 from Frontier Communications. The reimbursement from RCFC include $53,500 for the reconstruction of the storm drain on Pujol Street just south of the Temecula Help Center. IEW ANk The •- r. r:r S Ll h• 11, C.. 1 F I ii City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program SANTA GERTRUDIS CREEK PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE TRAIL EXTENSION Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the design, environmental, and construction of the extension and interconnect of the existing Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail. The extension and interconnect will provide access and under -crossings at Ynez Road, Interstate15 and Jefferson Avenue, and a continuous paved trail along the Santa Gertrudis Creek to interconnect with the Murrieta Creek Multi -Purpose Trail. Benefit: The project provides additional pedestrian and bicycle trails for the community. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: The design and environmental document is complete. Construction will start in April 2021 and is expected to be completed by June 2022. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.739 / PW08-04 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2022-23 2021-22 Adopted 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost Administration 470,547 135,940 606,487 Construction 1,096,124 3,880,919 160,000 5,137,043 Construction Engineering 123,200 643,900 767,100 Design & Environmental 714,810 62,302 777,112 MSHCP 33,927 11,926 45,853 Total Expenditures 2,438,608 4,734,987 160,000 - 7,333,595 Source of Funds: Assembly Bill 2766 58,683 58,683 BTA - Bicycle Transportation 223,311 223,311 Account DIF-Open Space & Trails 389,073 389,073 General Fund 78,920 78,920 Measure S 821,899 1,842,709 160,000 2,824,608 Senate Bill 1 722,595 3,036,405 3,759,000 Total Funding 2,294,481 4,879,114 160,000 - 7,333,595 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Added $160,000 to the i= Y2022123 appropriation deeded to close out the pr ofert 155 ANk Tf,F �•-.�r. r�' S:,u�I,Frn i.:: f::rni� City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program UTILITY UNDERGROUNDING - MAIN STREET AND VICINITY Infrastructure Project Pr ' ct Description: This project will design and underground the overhead utiliti at the southwest corner of Old Town Front Street, south side of Main Street an long the west side of the Pennypickle's Workshop Children Museum an Id Town Temecula Community Theater, adjacent to the Murrieta Creek Tsail. Benefit: This project co inues the City's efforts to underground overhead utilities in Old Town. An UNterground Utility District in parts of old Town was formed on October 10, 2006. Nadclition the Rule 20A program is being discontinued by the California Pulkc Utilities Commission (CPUC) and the City has a balance with Southern Cal Core Value: A Sustainable City is Edison (SCE) that it can use. Project Status: This is a new project. Design and pr aration of the construction documents will commence after City Cou it approval. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.NEW2 Level: II Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2022-23 2021-22 Adopted 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Total Project Cost Administration 174,000 174,000 Construction 696,000 696,000 Construction Engineering 48,720 48,720 Design & Environmental 125,280 125,280 Total Expenditures 1,044,000 - 1,044,000 Source of Funds: Measure S Reimbursements/Other 658,060 385,940 658,060 385,940 Total Funding 1,044,000 1,044,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. (1) City of Temecula CPUC'c Rule 20A program balance with Southern California Edison (SCE) as of January 1, 2021 is $385,940. Cancel Project and remove from the CiP Budget 167 ANk Tf,F �•-.�r. r�' S:�u�I,Frn c:;::f::rni� PARKS IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project facilitates rehabilitation and improvement projects at various City parks The rehabilitation and improvement projects could include, but are not limited to, parking lot repairs and resurfacing, landscape medians, raised and cracked concrete sidewalk replacement, fencing repair and replacement, landscaping and irrigation system efficiency upgrades, lighting system repairs and efficiency upgrades, on -site drainage improvements and other similar projects. Benefit: This project protects the City's vast investment in parks and open space facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: A priority list of rehabilitation projects has been developed. Rehabilitations are completed on an on -going basis. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.130 / Various Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Amended 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 21,400 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 146,400 Construction 2,106,806 301,794 607,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 325,000 4,315,600 Total Expenditures 1 2,128,2051 301,794 632,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,0001 4,462,000 Source of Funds: D I F-Quimby 250,000 250,000 General Fund 1,003,059 1,003,059 Measure S 764,000 356,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 2,870,000 Reimbursements (1) 56,941 282,000 338,941 Total Funding i 2,074,000 356,000 632,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 350,000 4,462,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs (1) Reimbursements for FV 2022123 is for the Turf Replacement Program from Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Added $2S2,000 to the i=Y2022123 appropriation fortut f repiarernent to be re rnbulsedby MWD 181 ANk Tf,F �•-.�r. r�' S:,u�I,Frn i.:: f::rni� RONALD REAGAN SPORTS PARK SKATE PARK Parks/Recreation Project Project Description: This project will remove and replace the existing skate park and install state-of-the-art street skate plaza elements. Benefit: This project will upgrade the existing aging facility and provide state- of-the-art recreation opportunity for the City's residents. In addition, this project satisfies the City's Core Values of a Healthy and Livable City, A Safe and Prepared Community, and Accountable and Responsive City Government. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This is a new project. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.222 I PW22-07 Level: I City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Adopted 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 25,000 25,000 Construction 895,000 500,000 1,395,000 Design & Environmental 80,000 80,000 Total Expenditures 1,000,000 500,000 - 1,500,000 Source of Funds: Measure S 1,000,000 500,000 1,500,000 Total Funding 1,000,000 500,000 - - 1,500,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs 4dded$500,000 to the FY2022123 appropriation needed to construrt the pi,olect 189 c7"ll The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL AREA Infrastructure Project Project Description: The project include the design and construction of a multi -use outdoor recreational area adjacent to Mary Phillips Senior Center. In addition, the Heating, Ventilation, and Airconditioning (HVAC) units will be replaced. The multi- use outdoor recreational area could include a shuffleboard court and other court - based activities Benefit: This project supports healthy and active lifestyles by promoting recreation programs and facilities. Core Value: Healthy and Livable City Project Status: This is a new project Department: Public Works Level: II 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Baseline 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 50,000 50,000 Construction 480,894 480,894 Construction Engineering 25,000 25,000 Design & Environmental 75,000 75,000 Total Ex n i r 630,894 4 CDBG - CV2 (1) I I 630,894 I 630,894 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs (1) Contingent on the City Council approval of the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Action Plan New Project Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget Amendment Summary for Various Projects Adopted Proposed Proposed Amended Proposed Project Name FY 2022-23 Amendment Amendment FY 2022-23 Source Budget City Funds External Fund Source Budget of Fund 1 City Facilities Rehabilitation $500,000 $250,000 $0 $750,000 Measure "S" H Murrieta Creek Improvements $0 $0 $53,500 $53,500 RCFC&WCD Reimbursement 3 Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension $0 $160,000 $0 $160,000 Measure "S" 4 Utility Undergrounding - Main Street and Vicinity $658,060 -$658,060 $0 $0 $658,060 Credit to "S" Measure 5 Parks Improvement Program $350,000 $0 $282,000 $632,000 MWD Reimbursement 6 Ronald Reagan Sports Park Skate Park $0 $500,000 $0 $500,000 Measure "S" 7 Mary Phillips Senior Center Outdoor Recreational Area $0 $0 $630,894 $630,894 CDBG-CV2 Total New Appropriation from Measure "S" $910,000 Credit to Measure "S"-$658,060 Net Impact to Measure "S" $251,940 External Fund Sources (Reimbursements and Grant) $966,394 Item No. 6 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution Acknowledging Receipt of the Annual Inspection Report Pursuant to SB 1205 PREPARED BY: Elsa Wigle, Assistant Fire Marshal Wendy Miller, Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE MARSHAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE SB 1205 STATE MANDATED ANNUAL INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13145, 13146 AND 17921 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE BACKGROUND: Senate Bill (SB) 1205 was approved on September 27, 2018, which requires annual inspection reporting to the City Council on Fire Department compliance of State Mandated inspections. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code 13145, 13146 and 17921, the City of Temecula Fire Department inspects all structures for compliance with building standards as well as other regulations set forth by the State Fire Marshal. These inspected structures include hotels, motels, lodging houses, apartment houses, as well as all public and private schools. In 2017, the City of Temecula formed its annual inspection program to comply with the California Health and Safety Code. Since the start of this program the city has seen benefits of the comprehensive inspection program and the increased levels of safety within these facilities. The department assures compliance of these facilities by scheduling inspections with property owners during the property's assigned inspection month. Currently, the Fire Department has completed all 1,036 buildings required by SB 1205 annual inspections for FY 2021-2022. The City of Temecula completed 100% of their state mandated annual inspections and have also followed up on 447 inspections that had correction notices from these state mandated inspections. A copy of the SB 1205 Annual Report is attached to Resolution No. 2022- as Exhibit A. FISCAL IMPACT: None. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A REPORT MADE BY THE FIRE MARSHAL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA FIRE DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE SB 1205 STATE MANDATED ANNUAL INSPECTION OF CERTAIN OCCUPANCIES PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 13145, 13146 AND 17921 OF THE CALIFORNIA HEALTH AND SAFETY CODE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. A. WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 13146.4 was added in 2018, and became effective on September 27, 2018; and B. WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 requires all fire departments, including the City of Temecula Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to perform annual inspections in every building used as a public or private schools, hotels, motels, lodging houses, and apartment houses for compliance with building standards, as provided and C. WHEREAS, California Health and Safety Code Section 13146.4 requires all fire departments, including the City of Temecula Fire Department, that provide fire protection services to report annually to its administering authority on its compliance with sections 13146.2 and 13146.3 and, D. WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Temecula intends this Resolution to fulfill the requirements of the California Health & Safety Code regarding acknowledgment of the City of Temecula Fire Department's compliance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 13146.4. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: The Council expressly acknowledges the receipt of the annual fire inspection report for Fiscal Year 2021-2022, attached hereto as Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT "A" State Mandated Inspections Senate Bill (SB) 1205 State Mandated Required Inspections for the City of Temecula Type of Inspection # of Initial Annual # of Follow Up Annual Inspections Corrections % Completed Inspections Hotels/Motels 22 8 100 Apartment/Multi Family Complexes 963 423 100 Public Schools 26 6 100 Private Schools 25 10 100 Total 1,036 447 100 Item No. 7 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Council FROM: Aaron Adams, City Manager DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Resolution Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and Prospective Issuance of Special Tax Bonds PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Director of Finance RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT — TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD") was formed and subsequently bonds were issued in 2017 to finance various public facilities required for the development of the property in the CFD. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of an annual special tax levied on property in the CFD. The Authority has received a Petition (Including Waivers) (the "Petition") from Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer") requesting that the Authority, among other matters, annex property identified in the Petition to Zone 1 of the CFD. Furthermore, the Developer would like the Authority to issue special tax bonds (the "Bonds"), payable from special taxes on a parity with the bonds issued in 2017, to provide funds to finance costs of improvements authorized to be financed by the CFD in excess of available 2017 bond proceeds. The Developer has submitted to City of Temecula (the "City") a check in the amount of $82,500 (the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay costs of the City and the Authority needed to annex property and issue the Bonds. Pursuant to a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the "Agreement"), to be entered into by the Developer, the City and the Authority, and to be administered by the City, funds advanced by the Developer for CFD costs, including the Deposit, will be reimbursed to the Developer upon the issuance of the Bonds. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution that approves the Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement and authorizes any related necessary actions. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All costs associated with the annexation and the issuance of the Bonds, including the fees of consultants employed by the Authority to assist with the annexation and the Bonds, will be paid for from the Deposit and/or out of the proceeds of the Bonds when and if they are issued. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT — TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer") has submitted to the Finance Director of the City of Temecula (the "City") a check in the amount of $82,500.00 (the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay costs of the City and the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") in connection with proceedings under Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Act") to annex property to and issue special tax bonds for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"). Section 2. There has also been submitted a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the "Agreement"), to be entered into by the Developer, the City and the Authority (for itself and on behalf of the CFD), and the City now desires to enter into the Agreement with the Authority and the Developer in order to assist with the annexation of property to the CFD and the possible issuance of Bonds by the Authority for the CFD. Section 3. The City Council hereby approves and authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreement in the form on file with the City Clerk, and to take all actions on his part necessary to implement the Agreement. The Director of Finance is hereby authorized and directed to accept the Deposit and to use the Deposit (and any subsequent Deposits, as defined in the Agreement) in the manner contemplated by the Agreement. Section 4. The Mayor, City Manager, Director of Finance, City Clerk and all other officers of the City are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary or desirable hereunder with respect to the implementation of the Agreement, including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents, which they, or any of them, may deem necessary or desirable and not inconsistent with the purposes of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Quint & Thimmig LLP 7/30/22 8/3/22 DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Annexation of Property to and Issuance of Special Tax Bonds for Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) THIS DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is by and among the City of Temecula, California (the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for itself and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"), and Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership ("Woodside"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Woodside is the successor to Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC under an Acquisition Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2017 and amended on March 9, 2022 (as amended, the "Acquisition Agreement') with the Authority on behalf of the CFD; and WHEREAS, Woodside would like the Authority to issue special tax bonds (the "Bonds") to provide funds to finance costs of improvements authorized to be financed by the CFD and described in the Acquisition Agreement; and WHEREAS, Woodside owns property adjacent to the boundaries of the CFD (the "Property") and also would like to have the Authority take the actions needed to annex the property to Zone 1 of the CFD (the "Annexation"); and WHEREAS, Woodside is willing to deposit funds with the Authority to ensure payment of the costs of the Authority and the City in conducting proceeding for the Annexation of the Property to the CFD and for the issuance of the Bonds, provided that such funds so advanced are reimbursed to Woodside to the extent provided herein; and WHEREAS, the Authority, the City and Woodside now desire to specify the terms of said deposit and reimbursement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. The Deposit: Additional Advances. Woodside hereby agrees to provide to the City, in the form of a check made payable to the "City of Temecula, California" $82,500.00 (the "Deposit'), to be used by the City to pay the costs in conducting proceedings for the annexation of the Property to the CFD and the issuance of the Bonds for the CFD (as more fully described in Section 2(a) below, the "Initial Costs"), said check to be delivered by Woodside to the Finance 20009.22:J 18462 Director of the City. The City, by its execution of this Agreement, acknowledges receipt by the City of the Deposit. The check representing the Deposit will be cashed by the City, and the Deposit may be commingled with other funds of the City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the City shall at all times maintain records as to the expenditure of the Deposit. Woodside hereby agrees to advance any additional amounts necessary to pay any Initial Costs incurred by the City or the Authority, in excess of the amount of the Deposit, promptly upon written demand therefore by the Finance Director of the City stating that the then unspent and uncommitted balance of the Deposit is less than $5,000 (the "Additional Deposits" and, collectively with the Deposit, the "Deposits"). In the event that Woodside shall fail to remit the full amount of any such demand for additional amounts to the Finance Director of the City within ten (10) days of such a written demand, the City Manager may, in his sole and absolute discretion, direct City and Authority staff and consultants to cease all work related to the annexation of the Property to the CFD and the issuance of the Bonds until the full amount of any additional amounts so demanded has been received by the City. Section 2. Use of Funds. The Deposits shall be administered as follows: (a) The Finance Director of the City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to pay the Initial Costs, including but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of any consultants to the City or the Authority employed in connection with the annexation of the Property to the CFD, the issuance of the Bonds and the proposed expenditure of the proceeds of the Bonds to finance improvements authorized to be financed by the District and otherwise subject to the Acquisition Agreement (such as legal counsel, including the City Attorney, Formation Counsel, Bond Counsel and Disclosure Counsel, and municipal advisor and special tax consultants); (ii) the costs of an appraisal and other reports necessary or deemed advisable by City staff or consultants in connection with the Bonds; (iii) costs of publication of notices, preparation and mailing of a ballot and other costs related to the election with respect to the Annexation; (iv) a reasonable charge for City staff time, as determined by the City Manager in his sole discretion, in processing the Annexation and analyzing the Bonds and the expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto; and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City or the Authority with respect to the Annexation or the issuance of the Bonds. (b) If the Bonds are issued under the Act by the Authority and the Property is annexed to the District, the Authority shall provide for reimbursement to Woodside, without interest, of amounts charged against the Deposits, said reimbursement to be made to Woodside solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act. On or within ten (10) business days after the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the Finance Director of the City shall return any then unexpended Deposits to Woodside, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above, but have not yet been so paid. (c) If the Bonds are not issued and the Property is not annexed to the District, the Finance Director of the City shall, within ten (10) business days after adoption of a resolution stating the intent of the Authority to terminate proceedings under the Act with respect to the Annexation and/or the issuance of the Bonds, return any then unexpended Deposits to Woodside, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above but have not yet been so paid. -2- Section 3. Reimbursement of Other Woodside Costs. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit reimbursement of other costs and expenses of Woodside incurred in connection with the Annexation and the issuance of the Bonds from the proceeds of the Bonds, including, but not limited to fees and expenses of its legal counsel and any special tax or other consultant expenses incurred by Woodside. Any such reimbursement shall be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act and otherwise provided for, at the reasonable discretion of the Authority, in the proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds. Section 4. Agreement Not Debt or Liability of City or Authority. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that this Agreement is not a debt or liability of the City or the Authority, as provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act. Neither the City nor the Authority shall in any event be liable hereunder other than to return the unexpended and uncommitted portions of the Deposits as provided in Section 2 above and provide an accounting under Section 7 below. Neither the City nor the Authority shall be obligated to advance any of their own funds with respect to the Annexation or the issuance of the Bonds or the expenditures of the proceeds thereof, or for any of the other purposes listed in Section 2(a) hereof. No member of the City Council or of the Board of Directors of the Authority, or any officer, employee or agent of the City or the Authority shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder. Section 5. No Obligation to Annex Property to the CFD or to Issue the Bonds. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to annex property to the CFD, to issue the Bonds, or to expend any of its own funds in connection with the annexation of property to the CFD, or the issuance or expenditure of the proceeds of the Bonds. The Developer acknowledges that the annexation of property to the CFD is subject to a public hearing and a vote of the owner of the Property. Section 6. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 7. Accounting. The City Finance Director shall provide Woodside with a written accounting of proceeds of the Deposits expended pursuant to this Agreement within ten (10) business days of receipt by the Finance Director of the City of a written request therefore submitted by an authorized officer of Woodside. No more than one accounting will be provided in any calendar month and the cost of providing the accounting shall be charged to the Deposits. Section 9. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. Section 10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. -3- IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature line below. Executed on: August _, 2022 Executed on: August _, 2022 Executed on: August _, 2022 20009.22:J 18462 LANDOWNER: Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership By: WDS GP, Inc. a California corporation, its general partner By: _ Name: Title: CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA M Aaron Adams, City Manager AUTHORITY: TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, for itself and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) L0 Aaron Adams, Executive Director -4- Item No. 8 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Applications for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 Funding Through the Caltrans Division of Local Assistance for Various Citywide Traffic Safety Improvement Projects PREPARED BY: Nick Minicilli, Senior Civil Engineer Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution entitled: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING THE APPLICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) CYCLE 11 FUNDS THROUGH THE CALTRANS, LOCAL ASSISTANCE FOR VARIOUS CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND ACCEPTING THE TERMS OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT BACKGROUND: The Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP), codified as Section 148 of Title 23, United States Code (23 U.S.C. §148) is one of the core federal -aid programs. The purpose of the HSIP program is to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non -State-owned public roads and roads on tribal land. California's share of HSIP funds is split between the State HSIP for state highways and the Local HSIP for local roads. Eligible project costs include preliminary engineering, right of way, construction, and construction engineering for work on any public road or publicly owned bicycle or pedestrian pathway or trail. On May 9, 2022, the Local HSIP Cycle 11 Call -for -Projects was announced by Caltrans, Local Assistance. Caltrans indicates that approximately $210 million has been targeted for Cycle 11 which can be used for a variety of traffic safety improvement projects. The City's recently completed and adopted Local Roadway Safety Plan (LRSP) has identified potential grant eligible projects. Based on the recommendations from the LRSP, the Department of Public Works intends to submit multiple applications for HSIP Cycle 11 grant funding for the five (5) following projects: 1. Upgrade Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads: This project is anticipated to upgrade 55 signalized intersections with new pedestrian countdown signal heads and traffic signal controllers. The total project cost is estimated to be $500,000 and the City would provide a 10% match of the total cost. 2. Lighting and Traffic Signal Hardware: This project is anticipated to upgrade 127 signalized intersections with new LED safety lighting. A small number of the traffic signal locations will also get upgrades related to signal head hardware, signal wiring, and controller cabinets. The total project cost is estimated to be $2,000,000 and the City would provide a 10% match of the total cost. 3. Signal Timing Improvements: This project will provide fiber communications and timing improvements to traffic signals on multiple corridors including Butterfield Stage Road and Ynez Road. The traffic signals along these corridors will receive equipment upgrades to facilitate the communication upgrades. The total project cost is estimated to be $1,000,000 and the City would provide a 50% match of the total cost. 4. Bike Safety Improvements: This project will provide a combination of bike loops and bike legends on several corridors throughout the City. The total project cost is estimated to be $250,000 and the City would provide a 10% match of the total cost. 5. Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements: This project will provide ADA compliant pedestrian ramp enhancements adjacent to several school sites within the city. The total project cost is estimated to be $250,000 and the City would provide a 10% match of the total cost. Staff is currently working on the project applications to meet the grant deadline date of September 12, 2022. Grant project selections is anticipated in early 2023. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no immediate fiscal impact related to this action The proposed total cost of all the projects is estimated at $4,000,000 with a City match of $800,000. Potential fiscal impact could occur if each grant is awarded for the proposed projects. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, APPROVING THE APPLICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (HSIP) CYCLE 11 FUNDS THROUGH THE CALTRANS, LOCAL ASSISTANCE FOR VARIOUS CITYWIDE TRAFFIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS AND ACCEPTING THE TERMS OF THE GRANT AGREEMENT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Caltrans, Local Assistance has announced the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 Call for Projects for funding of infrastructure improvements to achieve a significant reduction in traffic fatalities and serious injuries on all public roads, including non -State-owned public roads and road on tribal land. A. Caltrans indicates that approximately $210 million of HSIP program funding is available for Cycle 11 transportation safety improvements to local agencies in the State of California. B. The City of Temecula, Department of Public Works, intends to submit multiple applications to request HSIP Cycle 11 grant funds to develop five (5) traffic safety improvement projects which include: 1. Upgrade Pedestrian Countdown Signal Heads 2. Lighting and Traffic Signal Hardware 3. Signal Timing Improvements 4. Bike Safety Improvements 5. Pedestrian Crossing Enhancements C. The City of Temecula agrees to a commitment of local agency match funds and the time implementation of the project in compliance with HSIP guidelines. D. The City of Temecula, if awarded program funds, will adhere to federal requirements including the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA). Section 2. The City Council hereby approves the filing of five (5) project applications for Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Cycle 11 funds to Caltrans, Local Assistance. Section 3. The City Council hereby authorizes the Director of Public Works/City Engineer to conduct all negotiants, execute and submit all documents including, but not limited to, applications, agreements, amendments, and payments requests and so on, which may be necessary for the completion of the aforementioned process. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Item No. 9 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick A. Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Agreement for Consultant Services with T.Y. Lin International for the I- 15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II, PW 16-01 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Avlin R. Odviar, Principal Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve an agreement for consultant services with T.Y. Lin International (TYLin) in an amount not to exceed $350,000 to provide engineering and construction support during construction of the I-I5/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II, PW16-01 Project. BACKGROUND: The construction contract for the subject Project will be advertised for bids soon. For large, complex projects it is prudent to retain the designer through bidding, construction, and closeout phases to address requests for information, review submittals, analyze changes, provide details on design intent, review/prepare contract change orders, prepare as -built plans, and assist the project manager and resident engineer as needed. As the engineer of record, it is appropriate that TYLin serve in this capacity. In addition to preparing the construction plans and specifications, TYLin was the lead consultant in preparing the environmental revalidation and supporting studies. Thus, TYLin retains unparalleled knowledge of the Project's development and final design. The subject agreement secures the engineering and construction support services of TYLin on a time and materials basis from construction bidding through project closeout. The terms, scope, and fee of the attached agreement reflect professional negotiations conducted between the parties. FISCAL IMPACT: The I-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project is included in the City's Capital Improvement Program FY 2023-27. Project costs are supported by numerous sources of funds as show in the attached Project Description. There are sufficient funds within the project budget to cover the cost of this agreement, $350,000. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Agreement 2. Project Description AGREEMENT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 1-15/FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS — PHASE 11, PW16-01 THIS AGREEMENT is made and effective as of August 23, 2022, between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation hereinafter referred to as "City"), and T.Y. Lin International, a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant" ). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. TERM This Agreement shall commence on August 23, 2022, and shall remain and continue in effect until tasks described herein are completed, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 2. SERVICES Consultant shall perform the services and tasks described and set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. Consultant shall complete the tasks according to the schedule of performance which is also set forth in Exhibit A. 3. PERFORMANCE Consultant shall faithfully and competently exercise the ordinary skill and competence of members of their profession. Consultant shall employ all generally accepted standards and practices utilized by persons engaged in providing similar services as are required of Consultant hereunder in meeting its obligations under this Agreement. 4. PREVAILING WAGES Pursuant to the provisions of Section 1773 of the Labor Code of the State of California, the City Council has obtained the general prevailing rate of per diem wages and the general rate for holiday and overtime work in this locality for each craft, classification, or type of workman needed to execute this Contractor from the Director of the Department of Industrial Relations. Copies may be obtained from the California Department of Industrial Relations Internet website at http://www.dir.ca.gov. Contractor shall provide a copy of prevailing wage rates to any staff or sub -contractor hired, and shall pay the adopted prevailing wage rates as a minimum. Contractor shall comply with the provisions of Sections 1720, 1725.5, 1771.1(a), 1773.8, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1777.6, and 1813 of the Labor Code. Pursuant to the provisions of 1775 of the Labor Code, Contractor shall forfeit to the City, as a penalty, the sum of $200.00 for each calendar day, or portion thereof, for each laborer, worker, or mechanic employed, paid less than the stipulated prevailing rates for any work done under this Agreement, by him or by any subcontractor under him, in violation of the provisions of the Agreement. This project, work, or service will be subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) pursuant to Labor Code Section 1771.4. 08/09/2021 5. REGISTRATION WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS Registration with the Department of Industrial Relations (DIR) is mandatory as a condition for bidding, providing certain services, and working on a public works project as specified in Labor Code Section 1771.1(a). Contractor and any subcontractors must be registered with the Department of Industrial Relations to be qualified to bid, or provide a proposal and/or time and material quote or be listed in a bid, proposal or quote, subject to the requirements of Public Contract Code Section 4104; or engage in the performance of any contract that is subject to Labor Code Section 1720 et seq., unless currently registered and qualified to perform public work pursuant to Labor Code Section 1725.5. Contractor and subcontractors will be required to provide proof of registration with the DIR. For more information regarding registration with the Department of Industrial Relations, refer to http://www.dir.ca.gov/Public-Works/PublicWorks.html 6. PAYMENT a. The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and terms and the schedule of payment as set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. This amount shall not exceed Three Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($350,000.00) for the total term of this agreement unless additional payment is approved as provided in this Agreement. b. Consultant shall not be compensated for any services rendered in connection with its performance of this Agreement which are in addition to those set forth herein, unless such additional services are authorized in advance and in writing by the City Manager . Consultant shall be compensated for any additional services in the amounts and in the manner as agreed to by City Manager and Consultant at the time City's written authorization is given to Consultant for the performance of said services. C. Consultant will submit invoices monthly for actual services performed. Invoices shall be submitted between the first and fifteenth business day of each month, for services provided in the previous month. Payment shall be made within thirty (30) days of receipt of each invoice as to all non -disputed fees. If the City disputes any of Consultant fees, it shall give written notice to Consultant within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice of any disputed fees set forth on the invoice. For all reimbursements authorized by this Agreement Consultant shall provide receipts on all reimbursable expenses in excess of fifty dollars ($50) in such form as approved by the Director of Finance. 7. SUSPENSION OR TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT WITHOUT CAUSE a. The City may at any time, for any reason, with or without cause, suspend or terminate this Agreement, or any portion hereof, by serving upon the Consultant at least ten (10) days prior written notice. Upon receipt of said notice, the Consultant shall immediately cease all work under this Agreement, unless the notice provides otherwise. If the City suspends or terminates a portion of this Agreement such suspension or termination shall not make void or invalidate the remainder of this Agreement. b. In the event this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section, the City shall pay to Consultant the actual value of the work performed up to the time of termination, provided that the work performed is of value to the City. Upon termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the Consultant will submit an invoice to the City, pursuant to Section entitled "PAYMENT" herein. 08/09/2021 8. DEFAULT OF CONSULTANT a. The Consultant failure to comply with the provisions of this Agreement shall constitute a default. In the event that Consultant is in default for cause under the terms of this Agreement, City shall have no obligation or duty to continue compensating Consultant for any work performed after the date of default and can terminate this Agreement immediately by written notice to the Consultant. If such failure by the Consultant to make progress in the performance of work hereunder arises out of causes beyond the Consultant's control, and without fault or negligence of the Consultant, it shall not be considered a default. b. If the City Manager or his delegate determines that the Consultant is in default in the performance of any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement, it shall serve the Consultant with written notice of the default. The Consultant shall have ten (10) days after service upon it of said notice in which to cure the default by rendering a satisfactory performance. In the event that the Consultant fails to cure its default within such period of time, the City shall have the right, notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, to terminate this Agreement without further notice and without prejudice to any other remedy to which it may be entitled at law, in equity or under this Agreement. 9. OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS a. Consultant shall maintain complete and accurate records with respect to sales, costs, expenses, receipts and other such information required by City that relate to the performance of services under this Agreement. Consultant shall maintain adequate records of services provided in sufficient detail to permit an evaluation of services. All such records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be clearly identified and readily accessible. Consultant shall provide free access to the representatives of City or its designees at reasonable times to such books and records, shall give City the right to examine and audit said books and records, shall permit City to make transcripts there from as necessary, and shall allow inspection of all work, data, documents, proceedings and activities related to this Agreement. Such records, together with supporting documents, shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years after receipt of final payment. b. Upon completion of, or in the event of termination or suspension of this Agreement, all original documents, designs, drawings, maps, models, computer files containing data generated for the work, surveys, notes, and other documents prepared in the course of providing the services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement shall become the sole property of the City and may be used, reused or otherwise disposed of by the City without the permission of the Consultant. With respect to computer files containing data generated for the work, Consultant shall make available to the City, upon reasonable written request by the City, the necessary computer software and hardware for purposes of accessing, compiling, transferring and printing computer files. C. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Consultant shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A, without the written consent of the Consultant. 10. INDEMNIFICATION, HOLD HARMLESS, AND DUTY TO DEFEND a. Indemnity for Design Professional Services. In the connection with its design professional services, Consultant shall hold harmless and indemnify City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their elected officials, officers, employees, servants, designated volunteers, and those City agents 08/09/2021 serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively, "Indemnitees"), with respect to any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including reimbursement of attorneys' fees and costs of defense (collectively, "Claims" hereinafter), including but not limited to Claims relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate in whole or in part to the negligence, recklessness, or willful misconduct of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, sub -contractors, or agents in the performance of its professional services under this Agreement. b. Other Indemnities. In connection with any and all claims, demands, damages, liabilities, losses, costs or expenses, including attorneys' fees and costs of defense (collectively, "Damages" hereinafter) not covered by Paragraph 10.a. above, Consultant shall defend, hold harmless and indemnify the Indemnitees with respect to any and all Damages, including but not limited to, Damages relating to death or injury to any person and injury to any property, which arise out of, pertain to, or relate to acts or omissions of Consultant or any of its officers, employees, subcontractors, or agents in the performance of this Agreement, except for such loss or damage arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the City, as determined by final arbitration or court decision or by the agreement of the parties. Consultant shall defend Indemnitees in any action or actions filed in connection with any such Damages with counsel of City's choice, and shall pay all costs and expenses, including all attorneys' fees and experts' costs actually incurred in connection with such defense. Consultant duty to defend pursuant to this Section 10.b. shall apply independent of any prior, concurrent or subsequent misconduct, negligent acts, errors or omissions of Indemnitees. 11. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Consultant shall procure and maintain for the duration of the contract insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property, which may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work hereunder by the Consultant, its agents, representatives, or employees. a. Minimum Scope of Insurance. Coverage shall be at least as broad as: i. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability form No. CG 00 01 11 85 or 88. ii. Insurance Services Office Business Auto Coverage form CA 00 01 06 92 covering Automobile Liability, code 1 (any auto). If the Consultant owns no automobiles, a non -owned auto endorsement to the General Liability policy described above is acceptable. iii. Worker's Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance. If the Consultant has no employees while performing under this Agreement, worker's compensation insurance is not required, but Consultant shall execute a declaration that it has no employees. iv. Professional Liability Insurance shall be written on a policy form providing professional liability for the Consultant's profession. b. Minimum Limits of Insurance. Consultant shall maintain limits no less than: 1. General Liability: Two Million ($2,000,000) per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability Insurance or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to this project/location or the general aggregate limit shall be twice the required occurrence limit. 08/09/2021 2. Automobile Liability: One Million ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury and property damage. 3. Worker's Compensation as required by the State of California; Employer's Liability: One million dollars ($1,000,000) per accident for bodily injury or disease. 4. Professional Liability Coverage: One million ($1,000,000) per claim and in aggregate. C. Deductibles and Self -Insured Retentions. Any deductibles or self -insured retentions shall not exceed Twenty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($25,000). d. Other Insurance Provisions. The general liability and automobile liability policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: 1) The City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers are to be covered as insured's, as respects: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of the Consultant's products and completed operations of the Consultant; premises owned, occupied or used by the Consultant; or automobiles owned, leased, hired or borrowed by the Consultant. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection afforded to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 2) For any claims related to this project, the Consultant insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the City, the Temecula Community Services District, the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees and volunteers. Any insurance or self -insured maintained by the City of Temecula, Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, its officers, officials, employees or volunteers shall be excess of the Consultant's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 3) Any failure to comply with reporting or other provisions of the policies including breaches of warranties shall not affect coverage provided to the City of Temecula, the Temecula Community Services District, and/or the Successor Agency to the Temecula Redevelopment Agency, their officers, officials, employees or volunteers. 4) The Consultant's insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of the insurer's liability. 5) Each insurance policy required by this agreement shall be endorsed to state: should the policy be canceled before the expiration date the issuing insurer will endeavor to mail thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City. 6) If insurance coverage is canceled or, reduced in coverage or in limits the Consultant shall within two (2) business days of notice from insurer phone, fax, and/or notify the City via certified mail, return receipt requested of the changes to or cancellation of the policy. e. Acceptability of Insurers. Insurance is to be placed with insurers with a current A.M. Best rating of A -:VI I or better, unless otherwise acceptable to the City. Self insurance shall not be considered to comply with these insurance requirements. 08/09/2021 f. Verification of Coverage. Consultant shall furnish the City with original endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements are to be signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. The endorsements are to be on forms provided by the City. All endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. As an alternative to the City's forms, the Consultant's insurer may provide complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements affecting the coverage required by these specifications. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR a. Consultant is and shall at all times remain as to the City a wholly independent contractor. The personnel performing the services under this Agreement on behalf of Consultant shall at all times be under Consultant's exclusive direction and control. Neither City nor any of its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers shall have control over the conduct of Consultant or any of Consultant's officers, employees, or agents except as set forth in this Agreement. Consultant shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its officers, employees or agents are in any manner officers, employees or agents of the City. Consultant shall not incur or have the power to incur any debt, obligation or liability whatever against City, or bind City in any manner. b. No employee benefits shall be available to Consultant in connection with the performance of this Agreement. Except for the fees paid to Consultant as provided in the Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Consultant for performing services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Consultant for injury or sickness arising out of performing services hereunder. 13. LEGAL RESPONSIBILITIES The Consultant shall keep itself informed of all local, State and Federal ordinances, laws and regulations which in any manner affect those employed by it or in any way affect the performance of its service pursuant to this Agreement. The Consultant shall at all times observe and comply with all such ordinances, laws and regulations. The City, and its officers and employees, shall not be liable at law or in equity occasioned by failure of the Consultant to comply with this section. 14. RELEASE OF INFORMATION a. All information gained by Consultant in performance of this Agreement shall be considered confidential and shall not be released by Consultant without City's prior written authorization. Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors, shall not without written authorization from the City Manager or unless requested by the City Attorney, voluntarily provide declarations, letters of support, testimony at depositions, response to interrogatories or other information concerning the work performed under this Agreement or relating to any project or property located within the City. Response to a subpoena or court order shall not be considered "voluntary" provided Consultant gives City notice of such court order or subpoena. b. Consultant shall promptly notify City should Consultant, its officers, employees, agents or subcontractors be served with any summons, complaint, subpoena, notice of deposition, request for documents, interrogatories, request for admissions or other discovery request, court order or subpoena from any party regarding this Agreement and the work performed there under or with respect to any project or property located within the City. City 08/09/2021 retains the right, but has no obligation, to represent Consultant and/or be present at any deposition, hearing or similar proceeding. Consultant agrees to cooperate fully with City and to provide City with the opportunity to review any response to discovery requests provided by Consultant. However, City's right to review any such response does not imply or mean the right by City to control, direct, or rewrite said response. 15. NOTICES Any notices which either party may desire to give to the other party under this Agreement must be in writing and may be given either by (i) personal service, (ii) delivery by a reputable document delivery service, such as but not limited to, Federal Express, that provides a receipt showing date and time of delivery, or (iii) mailing in the United States Mail, certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the address of the party as set forth below or at any other address as that party may later designate by Notice. Notice shall be effective upon delivery to the addresses specified below or on the third business day following deposit with the document delivery service or United States Mail as provided above. Mailing Address: City of Temecula Attn: City Manager 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 To Consultant: T.Y. Lin International Attn: Rodrigo Gonzalez 3633 East Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 900 Ontario, CA 91764 909-912-6903 Rodrigo.Gonzalez@tylin.com 16. ASSIGNMENT The Consultant shall not assign the performance of this Agreement, nor any part thereof, nor any monies due hereunder, without prior written consent of the City. Upon termination of this Agreement, Consultant sole compensation shall be payment for actual services performed up to, and including, the date of termination or as may be otherwise agreed to in writing between the City Council and the Consultant. 17. LICENSES At all times during the term of this Agreement, Consultant shall have in full force and effect, all licenses required of it by law for the performance of the services described in this Agreement. 18. GOVERNING LAW The City and Consultant understand and agree that the laws of the State of California shall govern the rights, obligations, duties and liabilities of the parties to this Agreement and also govern the interpretation of this Agreement. Any litigation concerning this Agreement shall take place in the municipal, superior, or federal district court with geographic jurisdiction over the City of Temecula. In the event such litigation is filed by one party against the other to enforce its rights under this Agreement, the prevailing party, as determined by the Court's judgment, shall be entitled to reasonable attorney fees and litigation expenses for the relief granted. 08/09/2021 19. PROHIBITED INTEREST No officer, or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement, the proceeds thereof, the Consultant, or Consultant's sub -contractors for this project, during his/her tenure or for one year thereafter. The Consultant hereby warrants and represents to the City that no officer or employee of the City of Temecula that has participated in the development of this agreement or its approval has any interest, whether contractual, non - contractual, financial or otherwise, in this transaction, the proceeds thereof, or in the business of the Consultant or Consultant's sub -contractors on this project. Consultant further agrees to notify the City in the event any such interest is discovered whether or not such interest is prohibited by law or this Agreement. 20. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties relating to the obligations of the parties described in this Agreement. All prior or contemporaneous agreements, understandings, representations and statements, oral or written, are merged into this Agreement and shall be of no further force or effect. Each party is entering into this Agreement based solely upon the representations set forth herein and upon each party's own independent investigation of any and all facts such party deems material. 21. AUTHORITY TO EXECUTE THIS AGREEMENT The person or persons executing this Agreement on behalf of Consultant warrants and represents that he or she has the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Consultant and has the authority to bind Consultant to the performance of its obligations hereunder. The City Manager is authorized to enter into an amendment on behalf of the City to make the following non -substantive modifications to the agreement: (a) name changes; (b) extension of time; (c) non -monetary changes in scope of work; (d) agreement termination. 08/09/2021 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: MATT RAHN, MAYOR ATTEST: By RANDI JOHL, CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: James tsarr, Vice President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney Consultant T.Y. Lin International Attn: Rodrigo Gonzalez 3633 East Inland Empire Blvd., Suite 900 Ontario, CA 91764 909-912-6903 Rodrigo.Gonzalez@tylin.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: W:Z 8/10/2022 08/09/2021 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF WORK GENERAL The 1-15/French Valley Parkway Improvements — Phase II project (Caltrans EA 08-43272) (Project) consists of constructing a two 12-foot lane northbound (NB) Collector -Distributor (CD) system along I-15 from the Winchester Road interchange northerly on -ramps to just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction providing connectors to 1-15 and 1-215 within the cities of Temecula and Murrieta in Riverside County. The proposed improvements will include the following: • Pavement widening • New NB 1-15 CD Connector • Bridge widenings at Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge and Warm Springs Creek Bridge • Drainage improvements • Retaining walls • Utility relocations TYLin International (TYLin) is the engineer of record for the Project. The City of Temecula (City) is the Project sponsor/implementer. During construction, the City will administer all contracts including construction, construction management/Resident Engineer, and engineering support (also referred to as Design Services During Construction, DSDC). The scope of work provides a general outline of the anticipated tasks required to provide engineering support services for the project before, during, and after construction. These tasks, and others as needed, will be performed on a time and materials basis at the direction of the City or its delegate. This scope/fee assumes a construction duration of 450 working days. TYLin, at its discretion, may employ the professional services of its sub consultants that performed work on the project during the PA&ED and/or PS&E phases of work: • Aguirre and Associates (survey) • Earth Mechanics, Inc. EMI (geotechnical) • Overland, Pacific & Cutler OPC (right of way) • Parsons Corporation (bridge hydraulics) TASK 1 - ROADWAY/CIVIL TYLin will provide design services during construction for all roadway related items for a duration of 22 months (88 weeks) as follows: 1.1) Provide support services during the bid period, to include response to Contractor RFI's, and answering questions from City Staff or Resident Engineer 1.2) Attend one pre -construction meeting, as requested by the Resident Engineer 10 08/09/2021 1.3) Assist the Resident Engineer in interpretation of contract documents (assuming 2 hours per week for 88 weeks) 1.4) Respond to Contractor RFI's 1.5) Visit construction site as requested by Resident Engineer (6 visits assumed) 1.6) Prepare as -built drawings based on Resident Engineer's marked -up plans and Caltrans guidelines. 1.7) Review Contract Change Orders (CCOs) Deliverables: As -built drawings TASK 2 - STRUCTURES TYLin will provide design services during construction for all structures related items for a duration of 22 months (88 weeks), this support will be for the Santa Gertrudis Creek Bridge, the Warm Springs Creek Bridge, the new NB 1-15 CD Connector, special design retaining MSE walls 420, and 420R1 as follows: 2.1) Provide support services during the bid period, to include response to Contractor RFI's, and answering questions from City Staff or Resident Engineer 2.2) Assist the Resident Engineer in interpretation of contract documents (assuming 1 hour per week for 88 weeks) 2.3) Respond to Contractor RFI's 2.4) Provide 4-scale bridge deck drawings 2.5) Review Contractor submittals, including: o Prestressing shop drawings o MSE wall drawings o Joint seal assembly drawings 2.6) Visit construction site as requested by Resident Engineer (6 visits assumed) 2.7) Prepare as -built drawings based on Resident Engineer's marked -up plans and Caltrans guidelines. 2.8) Review Contract Change Orders (CCOs) Deliverables: As -built drawings Task 2 Assumption: Does not include review of contractor submittals other than prestressing shop drawings, MSE wall drawings, retaining wall drawings, and joint seal assembly for the structures listed above. 11 08/09/2021 EXHIBIT B PAYMENT RATES AND SCHEDULE GENERAL The tasks described in the Scope of Work (Exhibit A) will be performed on a time and materials basis at the direction of the City or its delegate. It is understood that the actual work effort is not known and will be a function of the extent of inquiries, changes, and clarifications that arise as a result of the construction of the project. Actual cost shall not exceed the Total Fee without prior authorization from the City. Total Fee.......................................................................................$350,000.00 12 08/09/2021 T.Y. Lin Billing Rates Classifications 2022 Director $312 Principal Discipline* Engineer $292 Lead Discipline* Engineer $271 Senior Discipline* Engineer II $240 Senior Discipline* Engineer 1 $208 Discipline* Engineer 11 $172 Discipline* Engineer 1 $146 Engineer II $141 Engineer 1 $115 Design Technician III $151 Design Technician II $136 Design Technician 1 $104 Engineering Intern $63 $0 Senior Visualization/Architect $208 Visualization/Architect II $188 Visualization/Architect 1 $125 $0 Environmental Services Manager $208 $0 Principal Construction Engineer/Principal Constructability Reviewer $281 Senior Construction Engineer II/Constructability Reviewer 11 $219 Senior Construction Engineer I/Constructability Reviewer 1 $167 Construction Engineer/Constructability Reviewer $146 Assistant Construction Engineer/Inspector, Assistant Constructability Reviewer $125 $0 Project Controls 11 $115 Project Controls 1 $63 Vehicle Mileage * Disciplines include civil, transportation, structural, drainage, aviation, rail, etc. Construction Engineers/Inspectors are provided with trucks equipped with rotating amber safety beacons and toolboxes containing the necessary hand tools required during construction inspections. Specialty equipment, if required, may be billed separately. Hourly charges include provision for normal office overhead costs, such as office rental, utilities, insurance, clerical services, equipment, normal supplies and materials, and in-house reproduction services. Other expenses such as consultants or purchased outside services will be billed at cost plus 10 percent. Unless otherwise provided for in the contract, all hourly rates are subject to 4% annual escalation on January 1st of each year. In AGUIRRE & ASSOCIATES SCHEDULE OF HOURLY BILLING RATES Effective January 1, 2022 LAND SURVEYING SERVICES - OFFICE Principal Land Surveyor Land Surveyor CAD Technician LAND SURVEYING SERVICES - FIELD 1-Person Survey Crew 1-Person Survey Crew (Prevailing Wage) 1-Person Survey Crew (GPS) GPS Crew Assistant 1-Person Survey Crew (GPS) (Prevailing Wage) GPS Crew Assistant (Prevailing Wage) Survey Crew Party Chief Survey Crew Chainman Survey Crew Party Chief (Prevailing Wage) Survey Crew Chainman (Prevailing Wage) DIRECT COSTS Prints and Copies Delivery Charges Photogrammetry PLS $185.00 LS 176.00 CAD 110.00 1 PSC 144.00 1 PSC-PW 216.00 1 PSC-GPS 144.00 GPS-A 90.00 1 PSC-GPS-PW 216.00 GPS-A-PW 216.00 PC 144.00 CH 90.00 PC-PW 216.00 CH-PW 216.00 Cost Cost Cost 8363 CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 5A • LA MESA, CA 91942 • PH: (619)464-6978 • FAX: (619)464-7203 SURVEYING • MAPPING • RIGHT-OF-WAY ENGINEERING Earth Mechanics, Inc. Geotechnical & Earthquake Engineering EARTH MECHANICS, INC. FEE SCHEDULE 2022 LABOR CATEGORY FULLY BURDENED HOURLY RATE Principal/Senior Consultant $ 286.00 Principal Engineer/Geologist $ 286.00 Senior Engineer/Geologist $ 214.00 Senior Project Geologist $ 184.00 Project Engineer/Geologist $ 167.00 Senior Staff Engineer/Geologist $ 152.00 Staff Engineer/Geologist $ 127.00 Senior Technician $ 146.00 Technician* $ 73.00 Clerical* $ 123.00 *Non-exempt: subject to overtime pay per California law. 17800 Newhope Street, Suite B, Fountain Valley, California 92708 0 Tel: (714) 751-3826 0 Fax: (714) 751-3928 OPC 2023 Schedule of Hourly Rates Management & Implementation Senior Director $250.00 Program Manager / Director $200.00 Senior Project Manager $165.00 Project Manager / Project Controls Manager $150.00 Senior Agent / Senior Analyst / Project Coordinator $135.00 Agent / Analyst $120.00 Relocation Specialist $105.00 Utility Coordination Senior Utility Manager $200.00 Utility Manager $165.00 Senior Utility Coordinator $150.00 Utility Coordinator $135.00 Right of Way Engineering Project Engineer (PE) $225.00 Survey Manager (PLS) $200.00 Senior ROW Engineering / Survey Analyst $150.00 GIS / CADD Analyst $120.00 Real Estate Appraisal Valuation Director / Managing Director $275.00 Valuation Manager Senior Valuation Analyst Valuation Analyst $250.00 $225.00 $150.00 Assistant Valuation Analyst $120.00 Property Management/Property Services Property Management Supervisor $165.00 Property Manager Property Services Supervisor Community Liaison $135.00 $135.00 $120.00 Project Support/Administrative Project Support Specialist $90.00 Enhancing Lives Through Infrastructure www.OPCservices.com 0PC CIPC Billing Terms and Conditions Unless superseded by client -generated Billing Terms in an Agreement executed by OPC, the following terms shall apply to this Scope of Services. OPC considers local travel/mileage, photocopying, first class postage, telephone, facsimile, and mobile communication charges a normal part of doing business and such costs are included in the stated hourly rates. Out-of-pocket expenses including pre -approved travel and lodging, outside exhibit preparation, requested overnight courier or registered and/or certified mail (return receipt requested) charges, and specialty reproduction (unless otherwise specified) are in addition to the contract amount and will be charged at cost plus ten percent (+10%) for administration, coordination, and handling. Subcontracted services, other than those listed above, will be invoiced at cost plus ten percent (+10%). In the event OPC is required to perform any act in relation to litigation arising out of any project with the Client (for example, expert consulting, responding to a complaint, or proceeding with discovery and trial), such services are not part of this contract, nor are they part of our normal fees. If required, these types of services will be invoiced at two (2) times the regular hourly rates. In the event this contract extends twelve (12) months beyond the initial date of execution, the hourly rates and any remaining amount in the contract shall be adjusted upwardly by five percent (5%) per annum, compounded annually, on the anniversary date of this contract. Written communication services in other languages would be an additional cost and would be billed separately based on quoted hourly rates by independent translation services. Verbal communication in Spanish, if necessary, will be included at no additional charge. OPC will submit monthly invoices for the professional and trade services rendered based on the hourly rate schedule provided above. The client shall promptly pay the uncontested amount due within no more than thirty (30) days after receipt of invoice. Enhancing Lives Through Infrastructure a PC www.OPCservices.com Parsons Transportation Group, Inc. Classifications and Rates Fiscal Year 2022/2023 Rate Range Classification (FY 22/23)* Project Manager $180 - $200 Principal Environmental Planner $145 - $175 Senior Environmental Planner $90 - $100 GIS Specialist $90 - $100 Editor $135 - $145 Project Support $100 - $110 Senior Traffic Engineer $175 - $185 Traffic Engineer $120 - $130 Senior Noise Control Specialist $240 - $250 Noise Control Specialist $105 - $145 Project Scientist $150 - $175 Senior Landscape Architect $195 - $205 Landscape Architect $100 - $110 *These rates will increase an additional 5% for FY23/24 (starting on July 1, 2023) and will increase an additional 3% per Fiscal Year after June 30, 3024. Alk c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project Project Description: This project includes the design and construction of the two lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road Interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the 1-15/1-215 junction with connectors to 1-15 and 1-215. Benefit: This project will address and improve traffic circulation in the City's northern area by providing the northbound collector/distributer road system. Core Value: Transportation Mobility and Connectivity Project Status: The environmental re-evaluation and design are estimated to be completed in Fiscal Year2021-22. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.265.999.726 / PW16-01 Level: I Project Cost: Prior Years Actuals 2021-22 Adjusted 2022-23 Proposed Budget 2023-24 Projected 2024-25 2025-26 Projected Projected 2026-27 Projected Total Project Cost Administration 2,791,745 339,054 300,000 300,000 170,000 3,900,799 Construction 88,950,000 88,950,000 Construction Engineering 1,279 10,899,721 10,901,000 Design & Environmental 18,752,330 716,973 19,469,303 Land Acquisition 9,393,251 6,120,000 15,513,251 Utilities 1,993 1,993 Total Expenditures 1 30,940,599 107,025,748 300,000 300,000 170,000 138,736,346 Source of Funds: CFD 01-02 (Harveston) 1,005,840 1,005,840 DIF-Street Improvements 75,360 75,360 General Fund 4,236,174 4,236,174 INFRA Grant 50,000,000 50,000,000 Measure A 1,627,914 1,627,914 Measure S 454,000 4,807,585 300,000 300,000 170,000 6,031,585 Reimbursements 6,008,000 6,008,000 SAFETEA-LU 1,602,360 1,602,360 STIP-Surface Transportation 47,600,000 47,600,000 Improvement Program TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) 472,841 999,668 1,472,509 TUMF (RCTC) 2,343,000 2,343,000 TUMF (WRCOG) 11,450,112 5,283,492 16,733,604 Total Funding 27,673,241 110,293,105 300,000 300,000 170,000 138,736,346 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: 85 Alk c7" The Heart of Southern California Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program 1-15 / FRENCH VALLEY PARKWAY IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II Circulation Project 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Proposed 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. General Fund Includes Required Contribution match for TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) funds. 2. State Transportation Improvement Program 2014 RCTC Call for projects as approved by the Commission on November 13, 2013 ($10,000,000). 3. TUMF (RCTC)- Regional funding is pursuant to RCTC Agreement No.06-72-048-00 for a total of $7,517,000 ($5,517,000-ROW; $2,000,000-PS&E). $200,000 City Match, Phase I expended $3,174,000-ROW; $2,000,000 PS&E; $200,000 City Match. Phase II expended $2,343,000 ROW. 4. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 06-SW-TEM-1079 for a total of $11,575,000 reduced to $11,451,875 ($975,752-PA&ED; $8,801,875-PS&E; $1,674,248-ROW) for Phase I and Phase 11. 5. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $4,078,000 reduced to $4,043,000 ($108,724 PA&ED;3,934,296 PS&E) for Phase I and Phase 11. 6. TUMF (WRCOG) - TUMF Zone Funding is pursuant to WRCOG Agreement No. 05-SW-TEM-1064 for $1,925,000-ROW. No expenditures for Phase I. 7. TUMF (CETAP/RCTC) - Funding is pursuant to the RCTC Agreement No.17-73-007-00 in the amount of $1,472,509 ($673,562 ROW; $798,947 DESIGN; $106,603 City Match). 86 Item No. 10 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Amendment to the Agreement with MDG Associates, Inc., for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Administration Services PREPARED BY: Brandon Rabidou, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the first amendment to the agreement with MDG Associates, Inc., in the amount of $161,200, for a total agreement amount of $403,000, for Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Administration Services. BACKGROUND: MDG Associates, Inc. provides comprehensive Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) services for the City of Temecula. A portion of the services are funded through the CDBG program, where permissible. The original agreement, signed on July 1, 2019, allows for two one year extensions. The City is electing to extend the agreement, and increase the total agreement amount to accommodate two additional years of services. FISCAL IMPACT: There are no fiscal impacts to the City. The services provided by this agreement are funded through the CDBG program. ATTACHMENTS: First Amendment FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND MDG ASSOCIATES, INC. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK (CDBG) ADMINISTRATION SERVICES THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of July 1, 2022 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and MDG Associates, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2019, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) ADMINISTRATION SERVICES," in the amount of $241,800.00. b. The parties now desire to extend the term of the agreement to July 1, 2024, increase the payment in the amount of $161,200.00, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 1 of the Agreement entitled "TERM" is hereby amended to read as follows: "This Agreement shall remain and continue in effect until tasks herein are completed, but in no event later than July 1, 2024, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 3. Section 4 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The First Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Sixty -One Thousand Two Hundred Dollars and Zero Cents ($ 161,200.00), for a total Agreement amount of Four Hundred Three Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($403,000.00). 4. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. O8/09/2021 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney MDG ASSOCIATES, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: By: ��Al�'1► Guadalupe Munoz, Chief Financial Officer CONSULTANT MDG Associates Inc. Attn: Rudy Munoz 10722 Arrow Route Suite 822 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 rmunoz@mdg-ldm.com City Purchasing Mgr. I itials and ��� 2 08/09/2021 Item No. 11 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works / City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Second Amendment to the Agreement with STC Traffic, Inc. for On -Call Traffic Engineering Services PREPARED BY: Julie Tarrant, Principal Management Analyst RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve the second amendment to the agreement with STC Traffic, Inc., in the amount of $100,000, for additional on -call traffic engineering services. BACKGROUND: On July 1, 2020, the City Manager approved the Agreement for consultant services with STC Traffic, Inc. to provide on -call traffic engineering services in the amount of $100,000. On July 1, 2022, the City Manager approved the First Amendment, to extend the term of the Agreement to June 30, 2023. This Second Amendment adds $100,000, for a total agreement amount of $200,000, and allows for continued professional services to include plan review, plan check and inspection, and general traffic engineering services for the remainder of the fiscal year. FISCAL IMPACT: Adequate funds are available in the Department of Public Works, Annual Operating Budget Fiscal Year 2022-23, and Capital Improvement Program Fiscal Years 2023-2027. ATTACHMENTS: Second Amendment SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF TEMECULA AND STC TRAFFIC, INC. ON- CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES (AGREEMENT NO. 2020-209) THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made and entered into as of August 23, 2022 by and between the City of Temecula, a municipal corporation (hereinafter referred to as "City"), and STC Traffic, Inc., a Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Consultant"). In consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Amendment is made with the respect to the following facts and purposes: a. On July 1, 2020, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Agreement entitled "Agreement for Consultant Services in the amount of $100,000.00. b. On July 1, 2022, the City and Consultant entered into that certain Amendment entitled "Amendment for Consultant Services" to extend the term of the agreement to June 30, 2023. C. The parties now desire to increase the payment in the amount of $100,000.00, and to amend the Agreement as set forth in this Amendment. 2. Section 6 of the Agreement entitled "PAYMENT" at paragraph "a" is hereby amended to read as follows: The City agrees to pay Consultant monthly, in accordance with the payment rates and schedules and terms set forth in Exhibit B, Payment Rates and Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, based upon actual time spent on the above tasks. Any terms in Exhibit B, other than the payment rates and schedule of payment, are null and void. The Second Amendment amount shall not exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($100,000.00), for additional On -Call Traffic Engineering Services for a total Agreement amount of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($200,000.00). 3. Except for the changes specifically set forth herein, all other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 08/09/2021 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed the day and year first above written. CITY OF TEMECULA By: Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: By: Randi Johl, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: By: STC TRAFFIC, INC. (Two Signatures of corporate officers required unless corporate documents authorize only one person to sign the agreement on behalf of the corporation.) By: Jason Stack, President By: Stephen Mangan lei 1 , Vice President Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney CONSULTANT STC Traffic, Inc. Jason Stack, President 5865 Avenida Encinas, Suite 142-B Carlsbad, CA 92008 (760) 685-4212 "ason.stack stctraffic.com City Purchasing Mgr. Initials and Date: 8/10/2022 2 08/09/2021 Item No. 12 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Plans and Specifications, and Authorize the Solicitation of Construction Bids for Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project, PW21-04 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Stacy Fox, Park Superintendent RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Approve the Plans and Specifications and authorize the Department of Public Works to solicit construction bids for Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project, PW21-04; and 2. Make a finding that this project is exempt from CEQA per Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. BACKGROUND: As part of the Capital Improvement Program (CIP) Budget for Fiscal Year 2023-27, the City Council approved the Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project. The subject project includes the administration, design, and construction to retrofit existing potable water irrigation system to recycled water at Kent Hintergardt Memorial Park and Service Level C zone 13 Presley / Bridlevale slopes. The project is done in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) who will be reimbursing the City for the construction costs. As required by RCWD, the City signed a Notice of Intent to do the work under this program. Plans and Specifications are complete, and the project is ready to be advertised for construction bids. The contract documents are available for review in the Director of Public Works' office. The Engineer's Construction Estimate is $105,864 and the construction duration is estimated to be 60 working days. This project is exempt from the CEQA requirements pursuant to Article 19, Categorical Exemption, Section 15301, Existing Facilities, of the CEQA Guidelines. The project is a minor alternation of an existing facility involving the addition of a decorative fence, all involving negligible expansion of existing uses. FISCAL IMPACT: The Recycled Water Accelerated Retrofit Program Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget for Fiscal Years 2023-27. It is funded primarily with reimbursements from Rancho California Water District (RCWD), $170,000 with a contribution from Measure S ($55,000). Adequate funds are available in the project accounts to construct the project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Project Description 2. Project Locations f Alk The Heart of Sauthern Cali{arnia Wine Country City of Temecula Fiscal Years 2023-27 Capital Improvement Program RCWD RECYCLED WATER ACCELERATED RETROFIT PROGRAM Infrastructure Project Project Description: This project includes the administration, design and construction of two (2) sites within the City for the conversion of water facilities from potable to recycled water. This effort is in cooperation with Rancho California Water District (RCWD) to administer the implementation of improvements. Benefit: This project will reduce use of potable water, increase overall water savings and enhance energy efficiencies and potentially reduce greenhouse gas emissions. ,: Core Value: A Sustainable City Project Status: Project is estimated to be complete by Fiscal Year2022-23. Department: Public Works - Account No. 210.290.999.206 Level: I 2022-23 Prior Years 2021-22 Adopted 2023-24 2024-25 2025-26 2026-27 Total Project Project Cost: Actuals Adjusted Budget Projected Projected Projected Projected Cost Administration 11,000 11,000 Construction 150,000 40,000 190,000 Design & Environmental 24,000 24,000 Total Expenditures 185,000 40,000 225,000 Source of Funds: Measure S Reimbursements 15,000 40,000 170,000 55,000 170,000 Total Funding - 185,000 40,000 - - 225,000 Future Operating & Maintenance Costs: Total Operating Costs Notes : 1. Reimbursement revenue is anticipated from the Rancho California Water District (RCWD). 153 711E CITY OF Z'EEC1 � s I. A. Ilk F V �. OGN051 Z ^{ 1:2,257 �' 2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping si is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may _1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise re itude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGA Legend . Creeks Cities Streets <Null> PAVED -- PROPOSED UNPAVED Notes 711ECITYOF Z'EEC1 i-� f 1: 2,257 3.2 0 188.08 376.2 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may nc S_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere accurate, current, or otherwise relia atitude Geographics Group Ltd. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATI Legend Creeks Cities Streets <Null> PAVED -- PROPOSED UNPAVED Notes Item No. 13 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW 11-10 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Nino Abad, Senior Civil Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the construction of the Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project, PW 11-10, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond, and accept a one-year Maintenance Bond in the amount of 10% of the final contract amount; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion, if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On October 26, 2021, the City Council awarded a construction contract to Atom Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $998,398 and authorized the City Manager to approve construction change orders not to exceed the contingency amount of $99,839.80, to complete the Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project. The project, located at Friendship Park (formerly Pala Community Park), consisted of a 427-foot- long sheet pile wall constructed underground along the northern boundary of the park, between the soccer fields and Temecula Creek. The wall was embedded approximately 30 feet below the park ground level. The wall is intended to protect and support the park grounds in the event of erosion or significant sediment movement within Temecula Creek during heavy storms. A sidewalk was also constructed generally along the top of the wall to mark its location and provide access around the soccer field. Atom Engineering, Inc. has completed the work in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. All work will be warranted for a period of one year from March 24, 2022, the date the City obtained "beneficial use" of the project improvements. The retention for this project was released pursuant to the provisions of Public Contract Code 7107. The base amount of the construction contract was $998,398, one contract change order was issued in the amount of $98,218.26. This resulted in a total construction cost of $1,096,616.26. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the project and filing and recording the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Maintenance Bond 3. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to Atom Engineering, Inc., 40410 Vista Road, Hemet, CA 92544 to perform the following work of improvement: Flood Control Reconstruction and Repair Project No. PW11-10 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on August 23, 2022. That upon said contract The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, 1001 41" Avenue, Suite 1300, Seattle, WA 98154, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Friendship Park (Formerly Pala Community Park) 6. The location of said property is: 44900 Temecula Lane, Temecula, CA 92592 Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk BOND NO. 024256599 PREMIUM INCLUDED IN PERFORMANCE BOND CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS BOND NO. 024256599 MAINTENANCE BOND for FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR PROJECT NO. PW11-10 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENT THAT ATOM ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC., 40410 VISTA ROAD, HEMET, CA 92544 NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR a CORPORATION (fill in whether a Corporation, Partnership, or Individual) (hereinafter called "Principal"), and THE OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY ATTN: SURETY CLAIMS DEPARTMENT, 1001 4TH AVENUE, SUITE 1300, SEATTLE, WA 98154 NAME AND ADDRESS OF SURETY (hereinafter called "Surety"), are held and firmly bound unto CITY OF TEMECULA (hereinafter called "Owner") In the penal sum of ONE HUNDRED NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED SIXTY ONE DOLLARS AND SIXTY THREE CENTS {$1 �9,sfi1.63 l in lawful money of the United States, said sum being not less than ten percent of the Contract value payable by the said City of Temecula under the terms of the Contract, for the payment of which, we bind ourselves, successors, and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Principal entered into a certain Contract with the Owner, dated the 26TH day of OCTOBER , 20 21 , a copy of which is hereto attached and made a part hereof for the construction of FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR, PROJECT NO. PW11-10. WHEREAS, said Contract provides that the Principal will furnish a bond conditioned to guarantee for the period of one year after approval of the final estimate on said job, by the Owner, against all defects in workmanship and materials which may become apparent during said period; and WHEREAS, the said Contract has been completed, and was the final estimate approved on this the � day of s— 20a&, NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, that if within one year from the date of approval of the final estimate on said job pursuant to the Contract, the work done under the terms of said Contract shall disclose poor workmanship in the execution of said work, and the carrying out of the terms of said Contract, or it shall appear that defective materials were furnished thereunder, then this obligation shall remain in full force and virtue, otherwise this instrument shall be void, As a part of the obligation secured hereby and in addition to the face amount specified, costs and reasonable expenses and fees shall be included, including reasonable attorney's fees incurred MAINTENANCE BOND MB_ by the City of Temecula in successfully enforcing this obligation; all to be taxed as costs and included in any judgment rendered. The Surety hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work to be performed thereunder, or to the specifications accompanying the same, shall in any way affect its obligations on this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, or addition to the terms of the Contract, or to the work, or to the Specifications. Signed and sealed this 15TH day of JUNE 20 22 , (Seal) THE OHIO CASUALTY SURETY: INSURANCE COMPANY By: 6 - do�4— MARK D. IATAROLA (Name) ATTORNEY -IN -FACT (Title) APPROVED AS TO FORM: Peter M. Thorson, City Attorney PRINCIPAL: ATOM ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION, INC. (Name) Pines_ of N (Title) By: (Name) (Title) NOTE: Signatures of two corporate officers required for corporations. A Notarial Acknowledgement or Jurat must be attached for each of the Surety and Principal Signatures. MAINTENANCE BOND M6-2 ALL- PURPOSE CERTIFICATE OF ACKNOWLEDGMENT A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of Riverside On a before me, _Darci Lynn Vaez, Notary Public ere insert name and title or t e o icer) personally appeared Tamara Boyer and Larry Boyer who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the persons jwhose name s) isr subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sheAJED executed the same in his/he el uthorized capacityfleD and that by his/her el signature(@ on the instrument the persor s , or the entity upon behalf of which the person(sBacted, executed the instrument. certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct.. *my OARCI LYNN VAEZ Notary Public - California WITNESS my hand and official seal. RiversldeCounty Commission # 2335172 Comm, Expires 0[t 9, 2U24 Notary Public Signature (Notary Public Seal) ADDITIONAL OPTIONAL INFORMATION DESCRIPTION OF THE ATTACHED DOCUMENT Mck % r% + e^ &%xcc_-1-4%DA (Title or description of attached document) (Title or description of attached document continued) Number of Pages Document Date44� CAPACITY CLAIMED BY THE SIGNER ❑ Individual (s) 171 Corporate Officer President and Secreta (Title) ❑ Partner(s) ❑ Attorney -in -Fact ❑ Trustee(s) ❑ Other 2015 Version www.NotaryClasses.com 800-873-9865 INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THIS FORM This form complies with current California statutes regarding notary wording and, if needed, should be completed and attached to the document. Acknotwedgents from other states may be completed far documents being sent to that state so long as the wording does not require the California notary to violate California notary law. • State and County information must be the State and County where the document signer(s) personally appeared before the notary public for acknowledgment. • Date of notarization must be the date that the signer(s) personally appeared which must also be the same date the acknowledgment is completed. • The notary public must print his or her name as it appears within his or her commission followed by a comma and then your title (notary public). • Print the name(s) of document signer(s) who personally appear at the time of notarization. • Indicate the correct singular or plural forms by crossing off incorrect forms (i.e. he/she/grey- is /are ) or circling the correct forms. Failure to correctly indicate this information may lead to rejection of document recording. • The notary seal impression must be clear and photographically reproducible_ Impression must not cover text or lines. If seal impression smudges, re -seal if a sufficient area permits, otherwise complete a different acknowledgment form, • Signature of the notary public must match the signature on file with the office of the county clerk. Additional information is not required but could help to ensure this acknowledgment is not misused or attached to a different document. Indicate title or type of attached document, number of pages and date. Indicate the capacity claimed by the signer. If the claimed capacity is a corporate officer, indicate the title (i.e. CEO, CFO, Secretary). • Securely attach this document to the signed document with a staple. CALIFORNIA ALL-PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CIVIL CODE § 1189 A notary public or other officer completing this certificate verifies only the identity of the individual who signed the document to which this certificate is attached, and not the truthfulness, accuracy, or validity of that document. State of California County of SAN DIEGO On 6/15/2022 Date personally appeared before me, TRACY LYNN RODRIGUEZ, NOTARY PUBLIC Here Insert Name and Title of the Officer MARK D. IATAROLA Name(s) of Signer(s) t who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose names} is/&Fe subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/eheAh" executed the same in his/''r� fkm r" authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(a) acted, executed the instrument. F TRACY LYNN RODRIGUEZ ~ COMM.#2318838 SANDIEGOCOUNIY a3o- `M NOTARY PUBLIC-CALIFORNIAZ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JANUARY 1 1, 2024 Place Notary Seal and/or Stamp Above I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature Si ature ❑f No Public OPTIONAL Completing this information can deter alteration of the document or fraudulent reattachment of this form to an unintended document. Description of Attached Document Title or Type of Document: Document Date: Signer(s) Other Than Named Above: Capacity(ies) Claimed by Signer(s) Signer's Name: MARK D. IATAROLA ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual M Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: Number of Pages: _ Signer's Name: ❑ Corporate Officer — Title(s): ❑ Partner — ❑ Limited ❑ General ❑ Individual ❑ Attorney in Fact ❑ Trustee ❑ Guardian of Conservator ❑ Other: Signer is Representing: • s�kkff{i�€3#�P�k�F�1�41s�.�4Fi�t}[�"s7e8G�Ri7t9R��Y�h'6?�S-0V�s�4litGi4�iS��R33���W-�3'4?�i - 9 02017 National Notary Association This Power of Attorney limits the acts of those named herein, and they have no authority to bind the Company except in the manner and to the extent herein stated. ` Liberty 1 Liberty Mutual Insurance Company Mutual. The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company Certificate No: 8205111-024100 West American Insurance Company SURETY POWER OF ATTORNEY KNOWN ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New Hampshire, that Liberty Mutual Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Massachusetts, and West American Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Indiana (herein collectively called the "Companies"), pursuant to and by authority herein set forth, does hereby name, constitute and appoint, Helen Maloney; John G Maloney; Mark D. Iatarola; Sandra Figueroa: Tracv Holmes: Tracy Lynn Rodriguez all of the city of Escondido state of CA each individually if there be more than one named, its true and lawful attorney -in -fact to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver, for and on its behalf as surety and as its act and deed, any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations, in pursuance of these presents and shall be as binding upon the Companies as if they have been duly signed by the president and attested by the secretary of the Companies in their own proper persons IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney has been subscribed by an authorized officer or official of the Companies and the corporate seals of the Companies have been affixed thereto this __29th day of March . 2021 rn Q� M `m State of PENNSYLVANIA 1 Qy County of MONTGOMERY Liberty Mutual Insurance Company JP a Po Ub 3P_TnPaNs&. P� P3UR�y The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company ,R4, ti q �o 'L+T y �o °eaT� r+ West American Insurance Company �3 a sn %e Foci U a a tir � 191919 h 1991 � ��■ t ❑ d O d� TNcHLtg dO Sp NA IAAg`^,aa� tits rN0PA16F aa3' r �i7 i y� ''H1 to '',yr • ti� By: David M. Carey, Assistant Secretary On this 29th day of March , 2021 before me personally appeared David M. Carey, who acknowledged himself to be the Assistant Secretary of Liberty Mutual Company, The Ohio Casualty Company, and West American Insurance Company, and that he, as such, being authorized so to do, execute the foregoing instrument for the therein contained by signing on behalf of the corporations by himself as a duly authorized officer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto subscribed my name and affixed my notarial seal at King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, on the day and year first above written. 4;rl r5 %yFT rF< Commonwealth or Pennsylvania - Notary Seal v} qCN Teresa Pastella, Notary Public �N Montgomery County My commission expires March 28, 2025 By Commission number 1126044 4 ILI) {.' &Somber, Penn6yhvnm Assot�st orrmrar� y.,.1Ya Notary Public This Power of Attorney is made and executed pursuant to and by authority of the following By-laws and Authorizations of The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and West American Insurance Company which resolutions are now in full force and effect reading as follows: ARTICLE IV — OFFICERS: Section 12. Power of Attorney. Any officer or other official of the Corporation authorized for that purpose in writing by the Chairman or the President, and subject to such limitation as the Chairman or the President may prescribe, shall appoint such attorneys -in -fact, as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Corporation to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Such attorneys -in -fact, subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, shall have full power to bind the Corporation by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach thereto the seal of the Corporation. When so executed, such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the President and attested to by the Secretary. Any power or authority granted to any representative or attorney -in -fact under the provisions of this article may be revoked at any time by the Board, the Chairman, the President or by the officer or officers granting such power or authority. ARTICLE XIII — Execution of Contracts: Section 5. Surety Bonds and Undertakings Any officer of the Company authorized for that purpose in writing by the chairman or the president, and subject to such limitations as the chairman or the president may prescribe, shall appoint such attorneys -in -fact, as may be necessary to act in behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Such attorneys -in -fact subject to the limitations set forth in their respective powers of attorney, shall have full power to bind the Company by their signature and execution of any such instruments and to attach thereto the seal of the Company. When so executed such instruments shall be as binding as if signed by the president and attested by the secretary. Certificate of Designation — The President of the Company, acting pursuant to the Bylaws of the Company, authorizes David M. Carey, Assistant Secretary to appoint such attorneys -in - fact as may be necessary to act on behalf of the Company to make, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver as surety any and all undertakings, bonds, recognizances and other surety obligations. Authorization — By unanimous consent of the Company's Board of Directors, the Company consents that facsimile or mechanically reproduced signature of any assistant secretary of the Company, wherever appearing upon a certified copy of any power of attorney issued by the Company in connection with surety bonds, shall be valid and binding upon the Company with the same force and effect as though manually affixed I, Renee C. Llewellyn, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary, The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, and West American Insurance Company do hereby certify that the original power of attorney of which the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of the Power of Attorney executed by said Companies, is in full force and effect and has not been revoked. IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seals of said Companies this 15TH day of JUNE , 2022 INSIJ.9— PV�I IINV vasu qR A, CpRVO+tq� .tn yJ `QR4O/�T 'y `P OpPall, CI s0 �l1 ¢ S''� Fd fn 1912 0 1919 w n 1991 0 �,�T acµug .sa y� heMY4�,? L� Y �robreKP b� By. 0/7* TMN 3y� i h�a Renee C. Llewellyn, Assistant 5s'rxelary LMS-12e73 LMIC OCIC WAIC Multi Co 02/21 O 04 CV N Cl) 00 CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR PROJECT NO. PW11-10 This is to certify that nm (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL RECONSTRUCTION AND REPAIR, PROJECT NO. PW11-10, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: ADDRESS OR WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONT TOR: Dated: 1 /;R-o� By: Signatur Lot.nr Print Nan4b and T' I RELEASE R-1 Item No. 14 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08 PREPARED BY: Amer Attar, Engineering Manager Jenny McConville, Senior Office Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the Improvements for the Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On October 25, 2021, the Director of Public Works approved a minor construction contract with AG Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $60,000 to construct the improvements necessary for the installation of the Emergency Generator at Mary Phillips Senior Center, Project No. PW21-08. Per section 22032 of the Public Contract Code (PCC) and Section 3.32.010 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, public works projects of $60,000 or less may be performed by City employees, force account, negotiated contract, or by purchase order. Per City of Temecula Resolution and Delegation of Signature Authority from the City Manager dated June 19, 2019, the Director of Public Works may execute contracts of this type. The completed Project facilitated the installation of a Caterpillar Diesel Standby Generator at the Mary Phillips Senior Center located at 41845 Sixth Street in Temecula. The work included asphalt removal, trenching, construction of a concrete pad, installation of conduits, cables, an Automatic Transfer Switch (ATS), and modifications to the electrical panel to accommodate the ATS. The contract also included providing a crane to unload, set the generator, and anchor it in place. The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved contract and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The final contract amount was $56,300. The reduction from the original contract amount was due to having City forces do some of the working and not utilizing the built-in contingency. The quality of workmanship shall be guaranteed for one-year from date of acceptance per the Agreement for Minor Construction Services contract. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the Project and filing the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to AG Engineering, Inc., 8647 Helms Avenue, Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730, to perform the following work of improvement: Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on August 23, 2022. That upon said contract American Contractors Indemnity Company, 801 S Figueroa St, Unit 700, Los Angeles, CA 90017, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Mary Phillips Senior Center Emergency Generator, PW21-08 6. The location of said property is: 41845 Sixth Street in the City of Temecula Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER EMERGENCY GENERATOR PROJECT NO. PW21-08 This is to certify that Q - G t= N 611- t j , L- lea N c . (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as MARY PHILLIPS SENIOR CENTER EMERGENCY GENERATOR, PROJECT NO. PW21-08, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Mary Phillips Senior Center - 41845 Sixth Street, Temecula, CA92590 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description '. Dollar Amount to Dispute N — Pursuant to Public Contract Code gection 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demdrnds, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR: Dated: ^1 Z 1, By: Signature L L P n-ft Nam and firde Item No. 15 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Accept Improvements and File the Notice of Completion for the Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05 PREPARED BY: Ryan Castillo, Supervising Public Works Inspector Jenny McConville, Senior Office Specialist RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Accept the Improvements for the Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21- 05, as complete; and 2. Direct the City Clerk to file and record the Notice of Completion, release the Performance Bond; and 3. Release the Labor and Materials Bond seven months after filing the Notice of Completion if no liens have been filed. BACKGROUND: On April 12, 2022, the Director of Public Works approved a minor construction contract to American Ramp Company, Inc. in the amount of $60,000 to construct the Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05 (Project). Per section 22032 of the Public Contract Code (PCC) and Section 3.32.010 of the City of Temecula Municipal Code, public works projects of $60,000 or less may be performed by City employees, force account, negotiated contract, or by purchase order. Per City of Temecula Resolution and Delegation of Signature Authority from the City Manager dated June 19, 2019, the Director of Public Works may execute contracts of this type. The completed Project is approximately 6,897 square feet with an asphalt riding surface of approximately 2,704 square feet and an on -course length of approximately 261 linear feet. The contractor has completed the work in accordance with the approved contract and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works/City Engineer. The quality of workmanship shall be guaranteed for one-year from date of acceptance per the Agreement for Minor Construction Services contract. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact associated with accepting the Project and filing the Notice of Completion. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Notice of Completion 2. Contractor's Affidavit and Final Release RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 EXEMPT FROM RECORDER'S FEES Pursuant to Government Code Sections 6103 and 27383 NOTICE OF COMPLETION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: The City of Temecula is the owner of the property hereinafter described. 2. The full address of the City of Temecula is 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590. 3. The Nature of Interest is a Contract which was awarded by the City of Temecula to American Ramp Company, Inc., 601 McKinley Avenue, Joplin, MO 64801, to perform the following work of improvement: Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05 4. Said work was completed by said company according to plans and specifications and to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works of the City of Temecula and that said work was accepted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on August 23, 2022. That upon said contract Western Surety Company, 101 South Reid Street, Ste. 300, Sioux Falls, SD 57103, was surety for the bond given by the said company as required by law. 5. The property on which said work of improvement was completed is in the City of Temecula, County of Riverside, State of California, and is described as follows: Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PW21-05 6. The location of said property is: 45850 Wolf Creek Dr. N in the City of Temecula Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, California, do hereby certify under penalty of perjury, that the foregoing NOTICE OF COMPLETION is true and correct, and that said NOTICE OF COMPLETION was duly and regularly ordered to be recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of Riverside by said City Council. Dated at Temecula, California, this 23rd day of August, 2022. City of Temecula Randi Johl, City Clerk CITY OF TEMECULA, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT AND FINAL RELEASE for INFILL MINI PUMP TRACK AT WOLF CREEK PARK PROJECT NO. PW21-05 This is to certify that American Ramp Company , (hereinafter the "Contractor") declares to the City of Temecula, under oath, that he/she/it has paid in full for all materials, supplies, labor, services, tools, equipment, and all other bills contracted for by the Contractor or by any of the Contractor's agents, employees or subcontractors used or in contribution to the execution of its Contract with the City of Temecula, with regard to the building, erection, construction, or repair of that certain work of improvement known as Infill Mini Pump Track at Wolf Creek Park, PROJECT NO. PW21-05, situated in the City of Temecula, State of California, more particularly described as follows: Wolf Creek Park 45850 Wolf Creek Dr. North Temecula, CA 92592 ADDRESS OR DESCRIBE LOCATION OF WORK The Contractor declares that it knows of no unpaid debts or claims arising out of said Contract which would constitute grounds for any third party to claim a Stop Notice against of any unpaid sums owing to the Contractor. Further, in connection with the final payment of the Contract, the Contractor hereby disputes the following amounts: Description Dollar Amount to Dispute Pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 7100, the Contractor does hereby fully release and acquit the City of Temecula and all agents and employees of the City, and each of them, from any and all claims, debts, demands, or cause of action which exist or might exist in favor of the Contractor by reason of payment by the City of Temecula of any contract amount which the Contractor has not disputed above. CONTRACTOR: Dated: 6/1 /2022 By: ;di Qu�� Sign ure Josh Quade Project Manager Print Name and Title Item No. 16 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Receive and File Temporary Street Closures for 2022 Autumnfest Events PREPARED BY: Anissa Sharp, Management Assistant Nick Minicilli, Senior Traffic Engineer RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the temporary closure of certain streets for the following 2022 Autumnfest Events: EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FAIR ART & STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR/OPEN STREETS GREEK FESTIVAL HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL VETERAN'S DAY BACKGROUND: Six special events are scheduled between September 2022 and November 2022 which necessitates the physical closure of all or portions of certain streets within the Old Town area and other streets throughout Temecula. These closures are necessary for event operation as well as to protect participants and viewers. The six events and associated street closures are as follows: 1) EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS FAIR — September 10' The Emergency Preparedness Fair event will be held Saturday, September 1 Oth in the Town Square. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 12:00 p.m. on Friday, September 91h from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, September loth at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 12:00 p.m. on Friday, September 91h to Third Street to Fourth Street 7:00 p.m. on Saturday, September loth Street closures for the Emergency Preparedness Fair event are shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 2) ART & STREET PAINTING FESTIVAL — September 161h and 17' The Art & Street Painting Festival event will be held Friday and Saturday, September 161h and 17th in the Town Square. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, September 15th from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 8:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 17th at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Thursday, September 15th Mercedes Street to Third Street to Fourth Street 8:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 17th Street closures for the Art & Street Painting Festival event are shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 3) HEALTH & COMMUNITY RESOURCE FAIR/OPEN STREETS — September 24th The Health & Community Resource Fair/Open Streets will be held Saturday, September 241h in Old Town Temecula. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, September 23rd from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 241h at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, September 23rd Third Street to Fourth Street to 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 24th Main Street 6:00 a.m. on Saturday, September 241h From Old Town Front Street to driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 241h at Be Good Restaurant Fourth Street 6:00 a.m. on Saturday, September 241h to Old Town Front Street to Mercedes Street 10:00 p.m. on Saturday, September 24th Street closures for the Health & Community Resource Fair/Open Streets are shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto. 4) GREEK FESTIVAL — October 8t' and 911 The Greek Festival event will be held Saturday and Sunday, October 81h and 9th in Old Town Temecula. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 7th from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 8:00 a.m. on Monday, October loth at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 7th Third Street to Fourth Street to 8:00 a.m. on Monday, October loth Street closures for the Greek Festival event are shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 5) HALLOWEEN CARNIVAL — October 2811 The Halloween Carnival event will be held Friday, October 28th in Old Town Temecula. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 281h from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 11:00 p.m. on Friday, October 281h at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 8:00 a.m. on Friday, October 28th Third Street to Fourth Street to 11:00 p.m. on Friday, October 28th Street closures for the Halloween Carnival event are shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. 6) VETERAN'S DAY — November I It' The Veteran's Day event will be held Friday, November I Ith in Old Town Temecula. The street closures scheduled are shown below: Main Street 10:00 a.m. on Friday, November 1 lth from the easterly driveway edge of to 28636 Old Town Front Street 10:00 p.m. on Friday, November 1 lth at Be Good Restaurant to Mercedes Street Mercedes Street 10:00 a.m. on Friday, November 1 lcn to Third Street to Fourth Street 10:00 p.m. on Friday, November 1 lth Street closures for the Veteran's Day event are shown on Exhibit "A" attached hereto. Street closures are allowed by the California Vehicle Code upon approval by the local governing body for certain conditions. Under Vehicle Code Section 21101, "Regulation of Highways," local authorities, for those highways under their jurisdiction, may adopt rules and regulations by ordinance or resolution for, among other instances, "temporary closing a portion of any street for celebrations, parades, local special events, and other purposes, when, in the opinion of local authorities having jurisdiction, the closing is necessary for the safety and protection of persons who are to use that portion of the street during the temporary closing." Chapter 12.12 of the Temecula Municipal Code, Parades and Special Events, provides standards and procedures for special events on public streets, highways, sidewalks, or public right of way and authorizes the City Council or City Manager to temporarily close streets, or portions of streets, for these events. FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of police services, as well as services provided by the City Public Works Maintenance Division (for providing, placing, and retrieving of necessary warning and advisory devices), are appropriately budgeted within the City's operating budget. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Exhibit A — Autumnfest Road Closures 2022 2. Exhibit B — Health & Community Resource Fair/Open Streets Road Closures Exhibit A Autumnfest Road Closures 2022 -- _ Autumnfest 2022 Events y Emergency Preparedness Fair _ September 10th, 2022 h Y • Art & Street Painting Festival • � - - +� •- � � �, .,� _ - - � September 16th & 17th, 2022 Greek Festival 4, October 8th & 9th, 2022 *. r r Halloween Carnival Mercedes St },- - �` October 28th, 2022 Veteran's Day November 11th, 2022 - F Cr. a- rr :;, -M s, + low !F rIr 3 S•t �- f Fourth St J Third St - w 7 ti-[' f Second St c Main St {s •• a � , . ir. ir+r � rti tr rx'.r•� ,�� .: , �.-.. � .�� �y.---�f• "'e.�--' �-` • �,� r +r rr r •r i r r *r5 Sr � �� � - � yy e-+.t � �T. '• � � r.- i'r r- r, rc��. � - - r. • _" i'j or- 2863.6_Old Town Front St r: a y ' i t r Old Town Front St .,� -� fo Road Closure �` . J f� + Exhibit B Health & Community Resource Fair/Open Streets Road Closures Health & Community Resource Fair/ Open Streets Road Closures Road Closure 8:00 AM September 23 - 10:00 PM September 24 r {{ �i Road Closure 6:00 AM September 24 - 10:00 PM September 24 Mercedes St va r - ' .� �: i, w, s, +�%y�[ry lF r , . W rr'�rr rr.��• *I: 0 ', Fourth St •,� *'a y• Third St _ .cs�rss t E Second St ► Ili: Main tqff F[[ �•-�� , .ter 7 � it rr rr'.r.� •�� .: _ ,. �.... � .�� � �',__, , �:-. • � � r r4 rr r .r i r r 28636 Old Town Front StAff : ti Item No. 17 ACTION MINUTES TEMECULA COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT MEETING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 41000 MAIN STREET TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA AUGUST 9, 2022 CALL TO ORDER at 6:35 PM: President James Stewart ROLL CALL: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart CSD PUBLIC COMMENTS -None CSD CONSENT CALENDAR Unless otherwise indicated below, the following pertains to all items on the Consent Calendar. Approved the Staff Recommendation (5-0): Motion by Rahn, Second by Schwank. The vote reflected unanimous approval. 14. Approve Action Minutes of July 26, 2022 Recommendation: That the Board of Directors approve the action minutes of July 26, 2022. CSD DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY SERVICES REPORT CSD GENERAL MANAGER REPORT CSD BOARD OF DIRECTORS REPORTS CSD ADJOURNMENT At 6:38 PM, the Community Services District meeting was formally adjourned to Tuesday, August 23, 2022 at 4:30 PM for a Closed Session, with a regular session commencing at 6:00 PM, City Council Chambers, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California. James Stewart, President ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Item No. 18 TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AGENDA REPORT TO: Executive Director/Board of Directors FROM: Aaron Adams, Executive Director DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Approve Resolutions Related to the Annexation of Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and Prospective Issuance of Special Tax Bonds PREPARED BY: Jennifer Hennessy, Treasurer RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Directors adopt the following resolutions entitled: RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO AND THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN BACKGROUND: In 2016, the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD") was formed and subsequently bonds were issued in 2017 to finance various public facilities required for the development of the property in the CFD. The bonds are payable from the proceeds of an annual special tax levied on property in the CFD. The Authority has received a Petition (Including Waivers) (the "Petition") from Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer") requesting that the Authority, among other matters, annex property identified in the Petition to Zone 1 of the CFD. The territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD is as shown on the Proposed Annexation No. 1 Boundary Map, attached to this Agenda Report. Furthermore, the Developer would like the Authority to issue special tax bonds (the "Bonds"), payable from special taxes on a parity with the bonds issued in 2017, to provide funds to finance costs of improvements authorized to be financed by the CFD in excess of available 2017 bond proceeds. The Developer has submitted to City of Temecula (the "City") a check in the amount of $82,500 (the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay costs of the City and the Authority needed to annex property and issue the Bonds. Pursuant to a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the "Agreement"), to be entered into by the Developer, the City and the Authority, funds advanced by the Developer for CFD costs, including the Deposit, will be reimbursed to the Developer upon the issuance of the Bonds. SPECIFIC ACTIONS: It is recommended that the Authority adopt the attached resolutions. The resolutions acknowledge receipt of the Deposit, express the Authority's intent to annex territory to the CFD and to authorize the levy of special taxes on the annexed property, and authorizes the employment of consultants necessary to assist the Authority to annex property to the CFD and issue the Bonds. The consultants are as follows: the firm of Webb Municipal Finance, LLC will serve as Special Tax Consultant to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Fieldman Rolapp & Associates, Inc. will serve as municipal advisor to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Quint & Thimmig LLP will serve as Annexation Counsel, Bond Counsel and Disclosure Counsel to the Authority for the CFD, and the firm of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated will serve as the underwriter for the Bonds. The Finance Director is also authorized to engage an appraiser in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. These resolutions also call for a public hearing on September 27, 2022, on the annexation of territory to the CFD and consider the levy of said special tax on the property therein. The passage of the resolutions does not obligate the Board of Directors of the Authority to annex property to the District or to issue the Bonds. FISCAL IMPACT: None. All costs associated with the annexation and the issuance of the Bonds, including the fees of the consultants, will be paid for from the Deposit and/or out of the proceeds of the Bonds when and if they are issued. The calculated special tax levy required for the 2022-23 Fiscal Year is listed in the preceding table. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolutions (2) 2. Proposed Annexation No. I Boundary Map 3. Petition (Including Waivers) 4. Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY ACKNOWLEDGING RECEIPT OF A DEPOSIT RELATIVE TO THE ANNEXATION OF PROPERTY TO AND THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS FOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Developer") has submitted to the Finance Director of the City of Temecula (the "City") a check in the amount of $82,500.00 (the "Deposit"), to be used by the City to pay costs of the City and the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") in connection with proceedings under Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Act") to annex property to and issue special tax bonds for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"). Section 2. There has also been submitted a Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement (the "Agreement"), to be entered into by the Developer, the City and the Authority (for itself and on behalf of the CFD), and the Board of Directors of the Authority now desires to direct the Finance Director of the City to accept the money to be advanced by the Developer, to authorize the execution and delivery by the Authority of the Agreement, to employ certain consultants necessary for the annexation of property to the CFD and the sale of bonds of the Authority for the CFD (the "Bonds"), and to authorize and direct Authority staff to take actions necessary to present to the Board of Directors of the Authority for approval the documents necessary to annex property to the CFD and issue the Bonds of the Authority for the CFD. Section 3. The Finance Director of the City is hereby requested to accept the Deposit and any future advances by the Developer pursuant to the Agreement (collectively, the "Deposits"), and to use the Deposits in the manner contemplated by the Agreement. The Executive Director of the Authority is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Agreement for and on behalf of the Authority and to take all actions necessary, in his discretion, to implement the Agreement. Section 4. City staff, acting for and on behalf of the Authority, are hereby requested to take all actions necessary or advisable to present to the Board of Directors of the Authority for its review and approval all proceedings necessary to annex property to the CFD and issue the Bonds of the Authority for the CFD. The passage of this Resolution shall in no way obligate the Board of Directors of the Authority to annex property to the CFD or to issue the Bonds. Section 5. The firm of Webb Municipal Finance, LLC is hereby designated as Special Tax Consultant to the Authority for the CFD, the firm of Fieldman Rolapp & Associates, Inc. is hereby designated as municipal advisor to the Authority for the CFD, and the firm of Quint & Thimmig LLP is hereby designated as Annexation Counsel, Bond Counsel and Disclosure Counsel to the Authority for the CFD. The Executive Director is hereby authorized and directed to execute agreements with said firms for their services in connection with the annexation of property to the CFD and the issuance of the Bonds for the CFD, in the respective forms filed with the Finance Director of the City. In any event, the fees and expenses of such consultants shall be payable solely from Deposits and/or the proceeds of the Bonds when and if they are issued by the Authority for the CFD. Section 6. The firm of Stifel, Nicolaus & Company Incorporated is hereby designated as the underwriter for the Bonds. Section 7. The Finance Director is hereby authorized to engage an appraiser in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, with the fees of the appraiser to be paid from Deposits or the proceeds of the Bonds when and if they are issued by the Authority. Section 8. The Executive Director, Treasurer, Secretary, legal counsel to the Authority, and all other officers and agents of the Authority are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions necessary or advisable to give effect to the transactions contemplated by this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 23rd day of August, 2022. ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] Matt Rahn, Chair N STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary RESOLUTION NO. TPFA 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY OF INTENTION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2) AND TO AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES THEREIN THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") has formed the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD") pursuant to the provisions of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, constituting Section 53311 et seq. of the California Government Code (the "Act") and Resolution No. TPFA 16-04 adopted by the Board of Directors of the Authority on April 26, 2016 (the "Resolution of Formation"), for the purpose of financing certain public improvements, as further provided in the Resolution of Formation; and Section 2. The Authority has received a Petition (Including Waivers) from Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership (the "Petition") requesting that the Authority, among other matters, annex property identified in the Petition to Zone 1 of the CFD. Section 3. Under the Act, the Board of Directors of the Authority, as the legislative body for the CFD, is empowered with the authority to annex territory to the CFD, and now desires to undertake proceedings to annex territory to Zone 1 of the CFD. Section 4. The Board of Directors of the Authority hereby finds and determines that public convenience and necessity require that territory be annexed to Zone 1 of the CFD. Section 5. The name of the CFD is Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2). Section 6. The territory included in the CFD is as shown on the boundary map of the CFD recorded on March 30, 2016 at 2:34 p.m. in Book 79 of Maps of Assessment and Community Facilities Districts at Page 53 (instrument no. 2016-123495) in the Office of the County Recorder for the County of Riverside, to which map reference is hereby made. The territory now proposed to be annexed to the CFD is as shown on the Proposed Annexation No. 1 Boundary Map, on file with the Secretary of the Authority, the boundaries of which territory are hereby preliminarily approved and to which map reference is hereby made for further particulars. The Secretary of the Authority is hereby directed cause to be recorded said Proposed Annexation Map No. 1 Boundary Map in the office of the County Recorder of the County of Riverside within fifteen days of the date of adoption of this Resolution. Section 7. The types of public facilities to be financed by CFD and pursuant to the Act consist of those facilities (the "Facilities") described in Exhibit A to the Notice of Special Tax Lien recorded in the Riverside County Recorder's Office on May 4, 2016, as Document No. 2016- 0180604 (the "Notice of Special Tax Lien"). It is presently intended that the Facilities will relate to the existing territory in the CFD and the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD. Section 8. Except to the extent that funds are otherwise available to the CFD to pay for the Facilities and/or the principal and interest as it becomes due on bonds of the CFD issued for the CFD to finance the Facilities, a special tax sufficient to pay the costs thereof, secured by recordation of a continuing lien against all non-exempt real property in the CFD (including the property being annexed thereto), will be levied annually within the CFD and collected in the same manner as ordinary ad valorem property taxes, or in such other manner as this Board shall determine, including direct billing of the affected property owners. The proposed rate and method of apportionment of the special tax among the parcels of real property within Zone 1 of the CFD, as now in existence and following the annexation proposed herein, in sufficient detail to allow each landowner within the territory proposed to be annexed to the CFD to estimate the maximum amount such owner will have to pay, are described in Exhibit B to the Notice of Special Tax Lien. Section 9. Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 6:00 o'clock p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of the Authority, the City Council Chambers at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, are hereby designated as the time and place when and where the Board of Directors of the Authority, as legislative body for the CFD, will conduct a public hearing on the annexation of territory to the CFD and consider and finally determine whether the public interest, convenience and necessity require the annexation of territory to Zone 1 of the CFD and the levy of said special tax on the property therein. Section 10. The Secretary of the Authority is hereby directed to cause notice of the public hearing to be given by publication one time in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the CFD. The publication of said notice shall be completed at least seven days before the date set for the public hearing. The notice shall be substantially in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Chair ATTEST: Randi Johl, Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. TPFA 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: BOARD MEMBERS: NOES: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: BOARD MEMBERS: ABSENT: BOARD MEMBERS: Randi Johl, Secretary EXHIBIT A NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Annexation No. 1 Notice is hereby given by the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") with respect to its Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), that on August 23, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Authority, as the legislative body for the District, adopted a resolution entitled "A Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority of Intention to Annex Territory to the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) and to Authorize the Levy of Special Taxes Therein" (the "Resolution of Intention"). Reference is hereby made to the Resolution of Intention on file with the Secretary of the Authority for further particulars. The following is a summary of the provisions of the Resolution of Intention. Pursuant to the Resolution of Intention, the Board of Directors of the Authority determined that the public convenience and necessity require that certain territory, as more particularly described in the Resolution of Intention, be annexed to Zone 1 of the existing District, all as provided in the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (Sections 53311 et seq., California Government Code) (the "Act"). The Resolution of Intention provides that the special taxes heretofore caused to be levied in Zone 1 of the District shall be levied in the territory proposed to be annexed to the District, subject to public hearing and landowner election proceedings as specified in the Act. Notice is further given that Tuesday, September 27, 2022, at the hour of 6:00 o'clock p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, in the regular meeting place of the Board of Directors of the Authority, City Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, are the time and place when and where the Board of Directors of the Authority, as the legislative body for the District, will conduct a public hearing on the annexation of the territory described in the Resolution of Intention to Zone 1 of the District and finally consider and determine whether the public convenience and necessity require the annexation of said territory to Zone 1 of the District and the levy of special taxes on the property therein. Notice is further given that at the hearing the testimony of all interested persons for and against the annexation of said territory to Zone 1 of the District or the levying of special taxes on the property within the territory proposed to be annexed will be heard. /s/ Randi Johl Secretary, Temecula Public Financing Authority A-1 PROPOSED ANNEXATION NO. 1 BOUNDARY MAP FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY THIS DAY OF _ , 2022. SECRETARY TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE WITHIN MAP SHOWING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ANNEXATION NO. 1 TO ZONE 1 OF TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, WAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY AT A REGULAR MEETING THEREOF, HELD ON THE _ DAY OF 20 , BY ITS RESOLUTION NO. SECRETARY TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY RECORDED THIS DAY OF 20__ AT THE HOUR OF O'CLOCK M IN BOOK PAGE OF MAPS OF ASSESSMENT AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICTS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA FEE: NO.: PETER ALDANA, ASSESSOR, COUNTY CLERK, RECORDER DEPUTY THIS BOUNDARY MAP CORRECTLY SHOWS THE ANNEXATION NO. 1 BOUNDARIES OF THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES Webb DISTRICT. FOR DETAILS CONCERNING THE LINES AND MUNICIPAL FINANCE DIMENSIONS OF LOTS OR PARCELS REFER TO THE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S MAPS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2022-2023. TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 16-01 (RORIPAUGH RANCH PHASE 2), ZONE 1 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA -i 40 ox) Rp NOT TO SCALE SHEET 1 OF 1 SHEET VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE 79 ANNEXATION NO. 1 SITE M0RR/ETA HOT SPRINGS Rp 5 RD c N\OO\1P �<<F 15 �O,L N ° 0 O���P� PP�gPRO RANCHO GP LEGEND ANNEXATION NO. 1 BOUNDARY LINE PARCEL LINE XXX-XXX-XXX ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER M: �GIS-Assessment�TemeculaICFD2016-01_Zonel_Annex1.mxd Quint & Thimmig LLP 7/30/22 8/3/22 PETITION (Including Waivers) REGARDING ANNEXATION BOND PROCEEDINGS UNDER THE MELLO-ROOS COMMUNITY FACILITIES ACT OF 1982 Board of Directors of the Temecula Public Financing Authority 41000 Main Street Temecula, California 92589-9033 Re: Annexation of Property to and the issuance of bonds for the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) Members of the Board of Directors: The undersigned duly authorized representative of the owner of the real property identified below (the "Property") hereby requests that you institute proceedings to annex the Property to and issue bonds for a community facilities district pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (the "Act"), and hereby respectfully petitions as follows: 1. We request that the Property, described by Riverside County Assessor's parcel numbers below, be annexed to Zone 1 of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "District"), and that you take all steps necessary to complete the proceedings for the annexation of the Property to the District. We hereby confirm that owner identified below is the current fee title owner of the Property and that the person or persons executing this Petition are authorized to do so on behalf of said owner. 2. It being our intention to proceed as quickly as possible with the annexation of the Property to the District, we hereby waive all otherwise applicable times for, notices of and ballot arguments and impartial analysis with respect to the election required under the Act in order to complete the annexation proceedings. 3. In furtherance of said waiver, we agree that any such election may be conducted by mailed or hand delivered ballot to be returned as quickly as possible to the Secretary of the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") and that the results of said election be canvassed and reported to you as soon as possible. 4. We further request that the Authority conduct proceedings for the issuance of special tax bonds for the District, and that the Authority engage the necessary consultants for the annexation and bond proceedings. 5. We have submitted $82,500.00 (the "Deposit") to be used by the Authority to pay the costs incurred by the City of Temecula (the "City") and the Authority in connection with the annexation and bond issuance proceedings. The Deposit shall be administered in accordance with that certain agreement among the City, the Authority and us entitled Deposit/Reimbursement Agreement. 20009.22:J18464 Respectfully submitted as of this Riverside County Assessor's Parcel Nos. of Property to be Annexed to the District: 964-640-015 964-640-016 day of August, 2022, by: Fee Title Owner of the Property to be Annexed to the District: Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership By: WDS GP, Inc. a California corporation, its general partner By: Name: Title: -2- Quint & Thimmig LLP 7/30/22 8/3/22 DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Annexation of Property to and Issuance of Special Tax Bonds for Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) THIS DEPOSIT/REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement") is by and among the City of Temecula, California (the "City"), the Temecula Public Financing Authority (the "Authority") for itself and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District No. 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) (the "CFD"), and Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership ("Woodside"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, Woodside is the successor to Roripaugh Valley Restoration, LLC under an Acquisition Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2017 and amended on March 9, 2022 (as amended, the "Acquisition Agreement') with the Authority on behalf of the CFD; and WHEREAS, Woodside would like the Authority to issue special tax bonds (the "Bonds") to provide funds to finance costs of improvements authorized to be financed by the CFD and described in the Acquisition Agreement; and WHEREAS, Woodside owns property adjacent to the boundaries of the CFD (the "Property") and also would like to have the Authority take the actions needed to annex the property to Zone 1 of the CFD (the "Annexation"); and WHEREAS, Woodside is willing to deposit funds with the Authority to ensure payment of the costs of the Authority and the City in conducting proceeding for the Annexation of the Property to the CFD and for the issuance of the Bonds, provided that such funds so advanced are reimbursed to Woodside to the extent provided herein; and WHEREAS, the Authority, the City and Woodside now desire to specify the terms of said deposit and reimbursement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual covenants set forth herein, and for other consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. The Deposit: Additional Advances. Woodside hereby agrees to provide to the City, in the form of a check made payable to the "City of Temecula, California" $82,500.00 (the "Deposit'), to be used by the City to pay the costs in conducting proceedings for the annexation of the Property to the CFD and the issuance of the Bonds for the CFD (as more fully described in Section 2(a) below, the "Initial Costs"), said check to be delivered by Woodside to the Finance 20009.22:J 18462 Director of the City. The City, by its execution of this Agreement, acknowledges receipt by the City of the Deposit. The check representing the Deposit will be cashed by the City, and the Deposit may be commingled with other funds of the City for purposes of investment and safekeeping, but the City shall at all times maintain records as to the expenditure of the Deposit. Woodside hereby agrees to advance any additional amounts necessary to pay any Initial Costs incurred by the City or the Authority, in excess of the amount of the Deposit, promptly upon written demand therefore by the Finance Director of the City stating that the then unspent and uncommitted balance of the Deposit is less than $5,000 (the "Additional Deposits" and, collectively with the Deposit, the "Deposits"). In the event that Woodside shall fail to remit the full amount of any such demand for additional amounts to the Finance Director of the City within ten (10) days of such a written demand, the City Manager may, in his sole and absolute discretion, direct City and Authority staff and consultants to cease all work related to the annexation of the Property to the CFD and the issuance of the Bonds until the full amount of any additional amounts so demanded has been received by the City. Section 2. Use of Funds. The Deposits shall be administered as follows: (a) The Finance Director of the City may draw upon the Deposits from time to time to pay the Initial Costs, including but not limited to: (i) the fees and expenses of any consultants to the City or the Authority employed in connection with the annexation of the Property to the CFD, the issuance of the Bonds and the proposed expenditure of the proceeds of the Bonds to finance improvements authorized to be financed by the District and otherwise subject to the Acquisition Agreement (such as legal counsel, including the City Attorney, Formation Counsel, Bond Counsel and Disclosure Counsel, and municipal advisor and special tax consultants); (ii) the costs of an appraisal and other reports necessary or deemed advisable by City staff or consultants in connection with the Bonds; (iii) costs of publication of notices, preparation and mailing of a ballot and other costs related to the election with respect to the Annexation; (iv) a reasonable charge for City staff time, as determined by the City Manager in his sole discretion, in processing the Annexation and analyzing the Bonds and the expenditure of the proceeds thereof, including a reasonable allocation of City overhead expense related thereto; and (v) any and all other actual costs and expenses incurred by the City or the Authority with respect to the Annexation or the issuance of the Bonds. (b) If the Bonds are issued under the Act by the Authority and the Property is annexed to the District, the Authority shall provide for reimbursement to Woodside, without interest, of amounts charged against the Deposits, said reimbursement to be made to Woodside solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act. On or within ten (10) business days after the date of issuance and delivery of the Bonds, the Finance Director of the City shall return any then unexpended Deposits to Woodside, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above, but have not yet been so paid. (c) If the Bonds are not issued and the Property is not annexed to the District, the Finance Director of the City shall, within ten (10) business days after adoption of a resolution stating the intent of the Authority to terminate proceedings under the Act with respect to the Annexation and/or the issuance of the Bonds, return any then unexpended Deposits to Woodside, without interest, less an amount equal to any costs incurred by the City or the Authority or that the City or the Authority is otherwise committed to pay, which costs would be subject to payment under Section 2(a) above but have not yet been so paid. -2- Section 3. Reimbursement of Other Woodside Costs. Nothing contained herein shall prohibit reimbursement of other costs and expenses of Woodside incurred in connection with the Annexation and the issuance of the Bonds from the proceeds of the Bonds, including, but not limited to fees and expenses of its legal counsel and any special tax or other consultant expenses incurred by Woodside. Any such reimbursement shall be made solely from the proceeds of the Bonds and only to the extent otherwise permitted under the Act and otherwise provided for, at the reasonable discretion of the Authority, in the proceedings for the issuance of the Bonds. Section 4. Agreement Not Debt or Liability of City or Authority. It is hereby acknowledged and agreed that this Agreement is not a debt or liability of the City or the Authority, as provided in Section 53314.9(b) of the Act. Neither the City nor the Authority shall in any event be liable hereunder other than to return the unexpended and uncommitted portions of the Deposits as provided in Section 2 above and provide an accounting under Section 7 below. Neither the City nor the Authority shall be obligated to advance any of their own funds with respect to the Annexation or the issuance of the Bonds or the expenditures of the proceeds thereof, or for any of the other purposes listed in Section 2(a) hereof. No member of the City Council or of the Board of Directors of the Authority, or any officer, employee or agent of the City or the Authority shall to any extent be personally liable hereunder. Section 5. No Obligation to Annex Property to the CFD or to Issue the Bonds. The provisions of this Agreement shall in no way obligate the Authority to annex property to the CFD, to issue the Bonds, or to expend any of its own funds in connection with the annexation of property to the CFD, or the issuance or expenditure of the proceeds of the Bonds. The Developer acknowledges that the annexation of property to the CFD is subject to a public hearing and a vote of the owner of the Property. Section 6. Severability. If any part of this Agreement is held to be illegal or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of this Agreement shall be given effect to the fullest extent reasonably possible. Section 7. Accounting. The City Finance Director shall provide Woodside with a written accounting of proceeds of the Deposits expended pursuant to this Agreement within ten (10) business days of receipt by the Finance Director of the City of a written request therefore submitted by an authorized officer of Woodside. No more than one accounting will be provided in any calendar month and the cost of providing the accounting shall be charged to the Deposits. Section 9. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their successors and assigns. Section 10. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original. -3- IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year written alongside their signature line below. Executed on: August _, 2022 Executed on: August _, 2022 Executed on: August _, 2022 20009.22:J 18462 LANDOWNER: Woodside 05S, LP, a California limited partnership By: WDS GP, Inc. a California corporation, its general partner By: _ Name: Title: CITY: CITY OF TEMECULA, CALIFORNIA M Aaron Adams, City Manager AUTHORITY: TEMECULA PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, for itself and on behalf of the Temecula Public Financing Authority Community Facilities District 16-01 (Roripaugh Ranch Phase 2) L0 Aaron Adams, Executive Director -4- Item No. 19 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Haide Urias, Senior Management Analyst DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Conduct Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act (TEFRA) Hearing, Adopt a Resolution Approving the Issuance of Not to Exceed $27,000,000 of California Enterprise Development Authority Revenue Obligations for the Benefit of Linfield Christian School PREPARED BY: Haide Urias, Senior Management Analyst RECOMMENDATIONS: That the City Council: 1. Conduct a public hearing as required by Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to receive comments relating to the issuance by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") of not to exceed $27,000,000 of the Authority's Revenue Obligations (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Linfield Christian School, a California nonprofit religious corporation (the `Borrower"); and 2. Adopt a resolution approving the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of educational facilities for the benefit of the Borrower. RESOLUTION NO. 2022 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $27,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING AND FURNISHING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED BACKGROUND: The Authority. The Authority is a joint exercise of powers authority (JPA) established by the California Association for Local Economic Development (CALED) whose purpose is to issue tax- exempt and taxable conduit revenue bonds to fund commercial and industrial development projects within member jurisdictions. Federal and state laws provide the ability for cities and counties to join together under cooperative agreements to form joint powers authorities to issue tax-exempt and taxable bonds to fund projects that provide a public benefit and serve the needs of residents within the jurisdictions of the participating members. Cities and counties in California utilize joint powers authorities primarily for economies of scale, to access specialized transaction knowledge and resources, and to avoid using valuable local staff time on these types of transactions. The Authority was created by the cities of Selma, Lancaster and Eureka. There more than 200 cities and counties who are associate members of the Authority. The Authority's activities are dedicated to providing economic development assistance to member jurisdictions as an extension of the economic development assistance provided by CALED to its members. As an Associate Member of the Authority, the City is eligible to participate in the Authority's programs. The Borrower. The Borrower traces its roots to 1936 when Dr. Mabel Culter, then Dean of Women at the Bible Institute of Los Angeles, saw a need for an elementary and secondary school that would integrate the best components of secular education with the historical and spiritual truths of the Christian faith. In 1968, the Borrower purchased a 105 acre campus in Temecula in order to build the facilities needed to provide the kind of education to which Culter Academy was dedicated. At that time, the school became known as The Linfield School. The Borrower expanded with the opening of Linfield Middle School in 1984 and Linfield Elementary in 1985, and continued to grow through the 1990's, providing an enriching college preparatory curriculum, while adding a wide variety of athletic programs, constructing new facilities, and developing new traditions. The Borrower's name was officially changed to Linfield Christian School in 2001 in order to reflect its mission, and with the construction of a state of the art two-story high school building in 2006, the three campuses were set in their current locations. Today the Borrower is home to a thriving community of dedicated teachers, passionate parents, and over 1100 remarkable students in Transitional -Kindergarten through 12th grade. The Project. The Borrower and the Authority have requested that the City conduct a Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 ("TEFRA") hearing and approve a resolution in accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 147(f) authorizing the issuance of tax-exempt bonds by the Authority in an amount not to exceed $27,000,000.00. A TEFRA hearing is required by the Internal Revenue Code before tax-exempt debt can be issued for the benefit of a private nonprofit corporation. The hearing gives the public an opportunity to comment on the use of tax-exempt funds by the Borrower. The proceeds of the Obligations will be used to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the acquisition, construction, installation, renovation, rehabilitation and equipping of the Borrower's educational facilities located at 31950 Pauba Road, Temecula, California 92592 (the "Property"), including, but not limited to, a middle school building, a high school building, a maintenance building, elementary school classrooms, road improvements, a gymnasium, a track, and other capital improvements to the Property. The proceeds of the Obligations will also be used to pay certain costs of issuance in connection with the issuance of the Obligations. The issuance of the Obligations as tax-exempt will reduce financing costs and debt service costs for the Borrower. In order to satisfy the requirements for the Obligations to be issued as tax- exempt, an applicable elected representative which is also a member of the Authority is required to conduct the TEFRA hearing and approve the issuance of the tax-exempt bonds in accordance with Sectionl47(f) of the Code. The City Council of the City of Temecula constitutes an applicable elected representative under Section 147(f) of the Code. A public notice of today's public hearing was published on behalf of the City at least seven days prior to the hearing in The Press -Enterprise newspaper by the law firm of Kutak Rock LLP. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact to the City. The adoption of the resolution approving the financing and refinancing of the Facilities and the issuance of the Obligations complies with the requirements of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. The City does not bear any responsibility for the tax-exempt status of the interest on the Obligations, the debt service on the Obligations or any other matter related to the Obligations. The approval of the Obligations to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the Facilities is not subject to compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (California Public Resources Code, Section 21100, et seq.). ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. City Council Resolution 19-45, California Association for Local Economic Development Membership 3. Notice of Public Hearing RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING THE ISSUANCE BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF NOT TO EXCEED $27,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY REVENUE OBLIGATIONS FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING AND FURNISHING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AND OTHER MATTERS RELATING THERETO HEREIN SPECIFIED WHEREAS, Linfield Christian School, a nonprofit religious corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "Borrower"), has submitted and the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") has accepted, an application requesting the Authority to issue, from time to time, pursuant to a plan of finance, of one or more series of its tax-exempt bonds, notes, or other evidence of indebtedness, in an amount not to exceed $27,000,000 (the "Obligations") for the benefit of the Borrower pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State (commencing with Section 6500) (the "Act"); and WHEREAS, the proceeds of the Obligations will be used to (a) finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the acquisition, construction, installation, renovation, rehabilitation and equipping of the Borrower's educational facilities located at 31950 Pauba Road, Temecula, California 92592 (the "Property"), including, but not limited to, a middle school building, a high school building, a maintenance building, elementary school classrooms, road improvements, a gymnasium, a track, and other capital improvements to the Property (collectively, the "Facilities"); and (b) pay certain costs of issuance in connection with such financing and refinancing; and WHEREAS, the issuance of the Obligations must be approved by the governmental unit on behalf of which the Obligations are issued and a governmental unit having jurisdiction over the territorial limits in which the Facilities are located pursuant to the public approval requirement of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Facilities are located within the territorial limits of City of Temecula (the "City") and the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") is the elected legislative body of the City; and WHEREAS, the Authority and the Borrower have requested that the City Council approve the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority and the financing or refinancing of the cost of the development, construction, installation, equipping and furnishing of the Facilities with the proceeds of the Obligations pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Facilities will provide significant benefits to the City's residents through providing a quality and future -oriented education for students in the area and the Facilities will also create and retain employment opportunities for City's residents; and WHEREAS, the Authority's issuance of the Obligations will result in a more economical and efficient issuance process because of the Authority's expertise in the issuance of conduit revenue obligations; and WHEREAS, it is intended that this Resolution shall comply with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code; provided, however, that this Resolution is neither intended to nor shall it constitute an approval by the City Council of the Facilities for any other purpose; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, the City Council of the City, following notice duly given, held a public hearing regarding the issuance of the Obligations and now desires to approve the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA, AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The City Council hereby finds and determines that all of the recitals are true and correct. Section 2. The City Council finds that the Facilities will provide the significant benefits set forth in the recitals above. The City Council hereby approves the issuance of the Obligations by the Authority, which Obligations may be tax-exempt and/or taxable as approved by the Authority in its resolution, in an amount not to exceed $27,000,000 to finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the Facilities and paying the costs of issuance of the Obligations. This resolution shall constitute approval of the issuance of the Obligations within the meaning of Section 147(f) of the Code and shall constitute the approval of the issuance of the Obligations within the meaning of the Act; provided, however, that this Resolution shall not constitute an approval by the City Council of the Facilities for any other purpose. The City shall not bear any responsibility for the tax-exempt status of the Obligations, the repayment of the Obligations or any other matter related to the Obligations. Section 3. All actions heretofore taken by the officers, employees and agents of the City with respect to the approval of the Obligations are hereby approved, confirmed and ratified, and the officers and employees of the City and their authorized deputies and agents are hereby authorized and directed, jointly and severally, to do any and all things and to execute and deliver any and all certificates and documents which they or special counsel may deem necessary or advisable in order to consummate the Obligations and otherwise to effectuate the purposes of this Resolution. Section 4. This Resolution shall take effect from and after its adoption. 2 PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula duly and regularly held in Temecula, California, on August 23, 2022, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice. I further certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing copy with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office; that said copy is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and that said resolution has not been amended, modified, rescinded or revoked in any manner since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate and affixed the seal of the City of Temecula hereto this 23rd day of August, 2022. Randi Johl, City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. 19-45 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP BY THE CITY OF TEMECULA IN THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND THE EXECUTION OF AN ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT RELATING TO ASSOCIATE MEMBERSHIP OF THE CITY IN THE AUTHORITY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, the City of Temecula, California (the "City") is a municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of California; and WHEREAS, the City, upon authorization of the City Council (the "City Coucil"), may pursuant to Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Government Code of the State of California, commencing with Section 6500 (the "JPA Law") enter into a joint exercise of powers agreement with one or more other public agencies pursuant to which such contracting parties may jointly exercise any power common to them; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Selma, Lancaster and Eureka have entered into a Joint Powers Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006 (the "Agreement"), establishing the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Authority") and prescribing its purposes and powers; and WHEREAS, in furtherance of the City's economic development efforts, the City desires to become an associate member of the Authority; and WHEREAS, under the JPA Law and the Agreement, the Authority is a public entity separate and apart from the parties to the Agreement and the debts, liabilities and obligations of the Authority will not be the debts, liabilities or obligations of the City or the other members of the Authority; and WHEREAS, the form of associate membership agreement (the "Associate Membership Agreement") between the City and the Authority has been filed with the City, and the members of the City Council, with the aid of the City's staff, have reviewed the Associate Membership Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Temecula, hereby finds, determines and declares as follows: Section 1. Associate Membership in the Authority. The City Council hereby approves associate membership by the City in the Authority. Section 2. Approval of Associate Membership Agreement. The City Council hereby approves the form of, and authorizes the Mayor, the City Manager or any designee of such officers, to execute the Associate Membership Agreement and authorizes the City Clerk to 1 1 attest to such signature, in substantially the form on file with the City Clerk, together with any changes therein deemed advisable by the official signing the Associate Membership Agreement. Section 3. Official Action. The Mayor, the City Manger, the City Clerk and other officers and officials of the City, are hereby authorized and directed to take all actions and do all things necessary with respect to associate membership in the Authority including but not limited to the execution and delivery of any and all agreements, certificates, instruments and other documents which are necessary to effectuate the purposes of this resolution. Section 4. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. Section 5. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption by the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 9�" day of July, 2019. ATTEST: Randi Jo , ity Clerk [SEAL] Michael S. Naggar, Mayor 1 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) 1, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 19-45 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 9 h day of July, 2019, by the following vote: AYES: 4 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Rahn, Schwank, Stewart, Naggar NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Edwards ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Randi Johl, City Clerk 3 CERTIFICATE OF THE CITY CLERK I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of a resolution duly adopted at the meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula duly and regularly held in Temecula, California, on July 9, 2019, of which meeting all of the members of said City Council had due notice. I further certify that I have carefully compared the foregoing copy with the original minutes of said meeting on file and of record in my office; that said copy is a full, true and correct copy of the original resolution adopted at said meeting and entered in said minutes; and that said resolution has not been amended, modified, rescinded or revoked in any manner since the date of its adoption, and the same is now in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have executed this certificate and affixed the seal of the City of Temecula hereto this 9d` day of July, 2019. 42 � Randi Jo ,- ity Clerk n NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING WITH RESPECT TO THE ISSUANCE OF TAX- EXEMPT REVENUE OBLIGATIONS BY THE CALIFORNIA ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY FOR THE PURPOSE OF FINANCING, REFINANCING AND/OR REIMBURSING THE COST OF ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, INSTALLATION, EQUIPPING AND FURNISHING EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES FOR THE BENEFIT OF LINFIELD CHRISTIAN SCHOOL AND/OR A RELATED ENTITY NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that at 6:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, on August 23, 2022 at the City Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590, the City Council of the City of Temecula (the "City Council") will conduct a public hearing (the "Public Hearing") at which the City Council will hear and consider information concerning the issuance, from time to time, pursuant to a plan of finance, of one or more series of tax-exempt revenue obligations by the California Enterprise Development Authority (the "Issuer") in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $27,000,000 (the "Obligations") for the benefit of Linfield Christian School, a nonprofit religious corporation, duly organized and existing under the laws of the State of California (the "State"), and/or a related entity (the "Borrower"). The Issuer will loan the proceeds of the Obligations to the Borrower pursuant to one or more loan agreements (collectively, the "Loan Agreements"). The proceeds of the Obligations loaned to the Borrower will be applied to (a) finance, refinance and/or reimburse the cost of the acquisition, construction, installation, renovation, rehabilitation and equipping of the Borrower's educational facilities located at 31950 Pauba Road, Temecula, California 92592 (the "Property"), including, but not limited to, a middle school building, a high school building, a maintenance building, elementary school classrooms, road improvements, a gymnasium, a track, and other capital improvements to the Property (collectively, the "Facilities"); and (b) pay certain costs of issuance in connection with such financing and refinancing. The Borrower is an organization described in Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"), and will own and operate the Facilities in connection with its mission of providing an independent, college preparatory education. The Obligations will be paid entirely from repayments by the Borrower under the Loan Agreements. Neither the faith and credit nor the taxing power of the City of Temecula (the "City"), the State, or any other political corporation, subdivision or agency of the State is pledged to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on, the Obligations, nor shall the City, the State or any other political corporation, subdivision or agency of the State be liable or obligated to pay the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on, the Obligations. The Public Hearing is intended to comply with the public approval requirements of Section 147(f) of the Code. Those wishing to comment on the proposed nature and location of the Facilities and the financing or refinancing of the Facilities with the proceeds of the Obligations may either appear in person at the time and place indicated above. Written comments can be presented at the August 23, 2022 public hearing or may be submitted to the City Clerk, to be received no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 23, 2022. (Written comments are to be submitted to the City Clerk, City Council Chambers located at 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590.) Item No. 20 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manger DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Consider a Negative Declaration, General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) PREPARED BY: Scott Cooper, Senior Planner RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a Public Hearing and approve the project including a General Plan Amendment, Planned Development Overlay Amendment, Development Plan, and Tentative Tract Map (Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, and PA20-1326) and adopt related resolution and introduce ordinance: RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944- 370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323) ORDINANCE NO. 2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324) RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1325) RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326) SUMMARY OF ORDINANCE: An Ordinance for a Planned Development Overlay Amendment to the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) generally located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. BACKGROUND: In 2002, the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) was approved and adopted by the City of Temecula City Council. On February 1, 2017, the applicant withdrew a previous Development Plan application on the project site that proposed an approximately 65,100 square foot commercial center consisting of nine (9) buildings. On January 3, 2018, Planning Application No. PA 16-1427, a Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 160 unit apartment community was approved by the City of Temecula Planning Commission. That project was Phase I of the Rendezvous project and is fully constructed and occupied. On May 24, 2018, the owner of the project site presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of former Councilmembers Jeff Comerchero and Mike Naggar. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit. On September 22, 2020, staff presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of Mayor Matt Rahn and former Councilmember Mike Naggar. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development submitted Planning Application No. PA20- 1323, a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; PA20-1325, a Development Plan for a 134 unit market rate apartment community built on 7.61 acres; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. On May 26, 2022, staff presented the proposed project to the City Council Infill Land Use and Project Review Ad Hoc Subcommittee which consisted of Councilmembers Maryann Edwards and James Stewart. There were no issues or concerns with the project raised by the Subcommittee and there was a discussion on the required Extraordinary Community Benefit and the Fiscal Impact Analysis. General Plan Amendment Planning Application PA20-1323 is a proposed General Plan Amendment (GPA) is proposed to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use Professional Office designation on the "Lower Site" of the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay to a Medium Density Residential (M) Land Use. The GPA is needed to allow residential development on the "Lower Site" as the current Professional Office Land use does not allow for residential development. Planned Development Overlay Amendment Planning Application PA20-1324 is a proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment to the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay. The proposed amendment includes language specific for multifamily housing as it relates to the design guidelines and development standards, revisions to the planning area boundaries and naming convention, and removing the allowance of all other land uses other than multifamily residential. Development Plan Planning Application PA20-1325 is a proposed Development Plan for the construction of a 134 unit apartment community. The project is located on the "Lower Site" of the Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5), generally located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive on an undeveloped lot. The project consists of six (6) three-story residential buildings, one (1) two-story building that contains an enclosed garage on the first floor and residential units on the second floor, and seventeen garage buildings. There are 56 one -bedroom units that range in size from 651 square feet to 779 square feet, 42 two -bedroom units that range in size from 1,163 square feet to 1,257 square feet, and 36 three -bedroom units that range in size from 1,341 square feet to 1,431 square feet. There are two points of vehicular access to the project. There is a main access point on Rancho California Road as well as via an existing private drive directly to the west of the project. The project is required to provide 280 parking spaces for the project per Table 17.24.040 of the City of Temecula Development Code. The project proposes 280 parking spaces including 22 guest parking spaces. Community amenities associated with Phase II include a pool/spa area, playground, bbq area that includes a fireplace and covered picnic area, turf area, bike racks, exercise room, pet area with a pet drinking fountain, and a mail/package room. Tentative Tract Map Planning Application PA20-1326 is a proposed Tentative Tract Map will allow for the consolidation of eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The consolidation will allow for the entire project, Phases I & II, on one parcel under the same ownership. The Tentative Tract Map meets all the development standards of the City of Temecula Municipal Code and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. Community Meeting On October 20, 2020, a community meeting was organized by the applicant and held virtually via zoom with both a weblink and call -in option provided to the surrounding residents and neighbors within a 600-feet radius of the project. Staff attended this meeting along with five (5) residents. There were no questions, comments, or concerns raised by the residents that attended. Planning Commission Recommendation Staff presented the project to the Planning Commission on July 20, 2022. The Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the project subject to the Condition of approval and adopt the Negative Declaration. There was one public comment provided by email to staff regarding the project and one public speaker who expressed opposition to the project. The speaker who spoke in opposition requested that local skilled and trained workforce should be used and if local workforce was used it would lessen the greenhouse gas and mitigate the transportation environmental impacts associated with the project. The speaker also requested that the City prepare an Environmental Impact Report in order to further evaluate Land Use Analysis, Greenhouse Gas Impacts, Air Quality Impacts, Noise Impacts, Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts, Biological Impacts, and Transportation and Traffic Impacts. Growth Master Plan/Community Benefit On March 21, 2000, the City Council adopted the Growth Management Plan (GMP) which is intended to serve as the City Council's policy for the study and implementation of growth management measures in the City of Temecula. The GMP applies when projects involve specific land use decisions including General Plan Amendments and Specific Plan Amendments. Consistent with the Growth Management Plan, the proposed project is required to provide Community -wide public benefits that provide substantial added value to the entire community and citizens of Temecula commensurate with the scope of the project to fulfill the requirements of the City's GMP. The Community -wide public benefit, as recommended by the City Council Ad Hoc Infill Land Use and Project Review Subcommittee consisting of Councilmembers Maryann Edwards and James Stewart for the project is a $500,000.00 payment to the City of Temecula which will in turn be used by the City of Temecula for city-wide projects that benefit the residents of the City. The payment shall be made prior to the issuance of the first residential multi -family or commercial building permit for the project. FISCAL IMPACT: The City's fiscal policies requires that a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) be completed for any development that proposes an increase in residential density from what is currently allowed in the General Plan. The project proposed a change in land use from Professional Office to Medium Density Residential allow for residential development. The FIA is to evaluate the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the project by estimating the fiscal impact on the General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed project over a 20-year time period. If the FIA determines that the increased cost to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the project area will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the project ("City Services Deficit"), the project shall be conditioned to require the payment of funds to the City for negative impact on the General Fund, that is, the project shall be conditioned to pay the City the loss to General Fund revenues created by the proj ect as determined by the FIA. The applicant prepared a FIA in compliance with this requirement. The FIA found that the project would result in a City Services Deficit. The project is being conditioned to require that the owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum as described in the June 9, 2022 Final Fiscal Impact Analysis per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount as described in the June 9, 2022 Final Fiscal Impact Analysis of the previous year's payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. "Occupied Residential Property" means an assessor's parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request -that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City's budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. The project condition provides that the Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. ENVIRONMENTAL: A Negative Declaration concerning the Project was prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The City Council must adopt a Negative Declaration for the Project. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Aerial Map 2. Resolution - Adopting Negative Declaration 3. Final Negative Declaration with Appendices can be downloaded at: htlps://temeculaca.lzov/362/Environmental- Review-CEQA 4. Resolution - General Plan Amendment 5. Exhibit A — Amended General Plan Land Use Map 6. Ordinance — Planned Development Overlay Amendment 7. Exhibit A — Planned Development Overlay Amendment 8. Resolution — Development Plan 9. Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 10. Resolution — Tentative Tract Map 11. Exhibit A — Conditions of Approval 12. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-19 - Recommending Adoption of Negative Declaration 13. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-20 - Recommending Approval of a General Plan Amendment 14. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-21 - Recommending Approval of a Planned Development Overlay Amendment 15. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-22 Recommending Approval of a Development Plan 16. Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-23 Recommending Approval of a Tentative Tract Map 17. Plan Reductions - Development Plan 18. Plan Reductions - Tentative Tract Map 19. Fiscal Impact Analysis 20. Public Correspondence 21. Notice of Determination 22. Notice of Public Hearing 944-370-001 CITY OF TEMECULA PA20-1325 1 inch = 450 feet 1:5,400 ill 0 200 400 800 Feet I I I I I i i i I C/;,Oz � (The Heart of Southern California Date Created: 6/8/2022 Wine Country The map PA20-1325.mxd is maintained by City of Temecula GIS. Data and information represented on this map are subject to update and modification. The City of Temecula assumes no warranty or legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. This map is not for reprint or resale. Visit the City of Temecula GIS online at https://temeculaca.gov/gis RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). C. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. D. The City contracted with Ascent Environmental Inc. for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Ascent Environmental Inc. and City staff concluded the project could not have a significant impact on the environment. Based upon this determination, Ascent Environmental Inc. prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Negative Declaration ("Draft ND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. E. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft ND, along with the Draft ND and its Appendices, to the public and other interested parties for a 30-day comment period from May 27, 2021 through June 27, 2021. The City published a Notice of Intent to Adopt for the Draft ND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents were made available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 and on the City of Temecula website. F. During the comment period, the City received two (2) written comments on the Draft ND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final ND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)". I. On August 23, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final ND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that: A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. B. That the Initial Study/ND has been prepared and circulated in compliance with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the procedures set forth in the ordinances of the City. C. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft ND, the Final ND, and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. D. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final ND, the written and oral comments on the Draft ND, the Draft ND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony. E. The City Council reviewed the Final ND and all comments received regarding the Final ND prior to and at the August 23, 2022 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final ND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial N evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final ND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Final ND attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Final Negative Declaration can be downloaded at: https://temeculaca.gov/362/Environmental-Review-CEQA RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. After hearing all written and oral testimony on the proposed Project and duly considering the comments received, and following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-20, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)." F. On August 23, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. G. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)." H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. Consistent with Government Code section 65358, the City Council in approving the Project hereby finds, determines and declares that: General Plan Amendment A. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest. The current General Plan designation for the project site is a Professional Office (PO) land use as specified in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it allows for high -quality residential development in an area surrounded by residential development that would help to fulfill the City's regional housing needs, including the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. This General Plan amendment allows for residential use where it otherwise would not be permitted Section 3. Amendment to General Plan Text. The City Council approves and amends the Land Use Element of the General Plan to revise the General Plan Land Use designation for the parcels within the Rendezvous Phase II project from Professional Office to a Medium Density Residential land use and amends Figure LU-3 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit A, "Proposed General Plan" attached hereto and incorporated herein as though set forth in full. N Section 4. City Manager Authorization. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to take all steps necessary to implement this General Plan Amendment. Section 5. Consistency with General Plan. The Land Use Element of the General Plan, as amended by this Resolution, is consistent with the other elements of the General Plan and is consistent with Government Code Section 65300.5. Insofar as other portions of the General Plan need to be revised to effectuate this General Plan Amendment, the City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to make all necessary revisions to effectuate this General Plan Amendment. Section 6. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Resolution is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Resolution shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Resolution. Section 7. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon its adoption. Section 8. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk N SCALE IN FEET 0 200 400 800 1200 SCALE: 1 " = 400' GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT PREPARED BY: 160 S. Old Springs Road Suite 210 13FtV.Engineering, Inc. Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 Civil Engineering/Land Surveying/Land Planning 714-685-6860 90PA959 iT`:�',t1����!�C�i�s:_I11/�^,� �► .��11 �.�5;',��� � �11�►!� - � - _1W .0 9, a r lir- a F� &I wit . = ftwr #A V AL..L DATA TABLE ASSESSORS PARCEL NO. (APN 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 OF PARCEL MAP 31023, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 216, PAGES 80 & 81, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA ZONING DESIGNATION SUB —AREAS "A" & "B" OF PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) EXISTING LAND USE VACANT PROPOSED LAND USE (M) MILTI—FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (7-12) DU/ACRE EXISTING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION (PO) PROFESSIONAL OFFICE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION (M) MEDIUM RESIDENTIAL (7-12 DU/ACRE) TOTAL GROSS AREA PHASE II = 7.61 ACRES (PARCEL 1-7 OF PARCEL MAP 31023) LAND USES WITHIN 2.500 FEET WEST = MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M), EXISTING APARTMENT COMMUNITY SOUTH = LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LM), EXISTING SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENCES EAST = LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (LM), EXISTING SINGLE—FAMILY RESIDENCES NORTH = (ACROSS RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.) HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (H), EXISTING APARTMENT COMMUNITY OWNER/APPLICANT RENDEZVOUS MULTI —FAMILY LP 7210 JORDAN AVE., #B7 CANOGA PARK, CA 91303 CONTACT: BART BUCHALTER (818) 266-7871 BART@MJWGROUP.COM PREPARED BY DRC ENGINEERING, INC. 160 S. OLD SPRINGS RD., SUITE 210 ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92808 CONTACT: RENE VARGA (714) 685-6860 X337 RVARGA@DRC—ENG.COM RENDEZVOUS PHASE 11 Figure LU-3 Land Use Policy Map CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN sP► Specific Plan Implementation RESIDENTIAL HR Hillside (0-0.1 Du/Ac Max) RR Rural (0-0.2 Du/Ac Max) vL Very Low (0.2-0.4 Du/Ac Max) L Low (0.5-2 Du/Ac Max) LM Low Medium (3-6 Du/Ac Max) Medium (7-12 Du/Ac Max) 0 High (13-20 Du/Ac Max) COMMERCIAL / OFFICE ►vc Neighborhood Commercial _ Community Commercial HT Highway Tourist Commercial sc Service Commercial Po Professional Office INDUSTRIAL ►P Industrial Park 0 PUBLIC USES & OPEN SPACE I 0 N 00 P► Public Institutional Facilitiescli vA Vineyards/Agricultural 0 0 as Open Space w w Tribal Trust Lands ® Recreation Commercial Overlay w 0 J d • — Temecula City Boundary 00 ---- Sphere of Influence Boundary 0 N Planning Area 5�r, ROAp 0 79 hE i5 m SITE �R � �wr d o CALIFORNIA 4gpsa PALON VICINITY MAP NOT TO SCALE I to Iz 0 0 w Q J Q� 3 N 0 0 N Q a c� _0 X N co rM co 00 / x iCn E 73 Q a 0 U N E a) 0 00 M 00 00 0 N w Q z w _J L� DATE ISSUED: 10 28 20 ORDINANCE NO.2022- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay was approved by the City Council on October 22, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-05. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as approved shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "PDO". B. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. F. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-19 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." H. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-21 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." I. On August 23, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. J. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022-_"A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." Resolution No. 2022- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. K. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Provisions for Fiscal Impact Payments A. The City and owner estimate that the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the area resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the Project will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the Project ("City Services Deficit"). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated as of June, 2022 ("FIA"), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City the sum of sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year's payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. "Occupied Residential Property" means an assessor's parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City's budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Section 3. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Planned Development Overlay/Zone Change hereby makes the following findings: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City. The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element, as amended. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal I Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community's labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Section 4. Zoning Code Amendment. The City Council hereby amends Chapter 17.22 (PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY ZONING DISTRICT (PDO-5)) of Title 17 (Zoning) of the Temecula Municipal Code by amending Article VI, entitled "Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay District 5" to read as provided in Exhibit A, attached to this Ordinance and incorporated herein as thought set forth in full. Section 6. Consistency with General Plan. On , the City Council adopted Resolution No. , which amended the Land Use Element Map of the Temecula General Plan to change the land use designation of the Project area from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density (M) residential. Therefore, the foregoing amendments outlined in this Ordinance are consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan for the City of Temecula. Section 7. Severability. If any portion, provision, section, paragraph, sentence, or word of this Ordinance is rendered or declared to be invalid by any final court action in a court of competent jurisdiction, or by reason of any preemptive legislation, the remaining portions, provisions, sections, paragraphs, sentences, and words of this Ordinance shall remain in full force and effect and shall be interpreted by the court so as to give effect to such remaining portions of the Ordinance. Section 8. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. Section 9. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Ordinance and cause it to be published in the manner required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 2022- was duly introduced and placed upon its first reading at a meeting of the City Council of the City of Temecula on the 23rd day of August, 2022, and that thereafter, said Ordinance was duly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the day of , , by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District Chapter 17.22, Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 Table of Contents 17.22.140 Title 17.22.142 Purpose and Intent 17.22.143 Project Vision 17.22.144 Relationship With Development Code and Citywide Design Guidelines 1. Development Standards 2. Design Guidelines 3. Approval Authority 17.22.146 Use Regulations 17.22.148 Schedule of Permitted Uses 17.22.150 Design Standards and Setback Standards 17.22.152 Vehicular Circulation System Standards 17.22.154 Architectural and Landscape Design Standards 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board Text of new section 17.22.156: 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board E RENDEZVOUS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY DISTRICT 17.22.140 TITLE Sections 17.22.140 through 17.22.156 shall be known as "PDO-5" (Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District). 17.22.142 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO-5) is intended to provide regulations for the safe and efficient operation, and creative design of a unique residential area within the City. PDO-5 encompasses 22.97 acres and is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 200 feet west of the intersection of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Way. PDO-5 consists of Medium Density Residential (7-12.9 dwelling units/acre). The PDO area is surrounded by existing multi -family developments to the north and to the west and existing single-family developments to the south and to the east. This special overlay zoning district regulation is intended to be compatible and complimentary to the existing residential development and M (Medium Density Residential, 7-12.9 dwelling units/acre) proposed as part of the PDO. Performance standards, in addition to those referenced from the City's Development Code and City- wide Design Guidelines, have been provided to ensure internal project compatibility as well as compatibility with the adjacent single-family residential development and to protect these adjoining uses from excessive noise, odor, smoke, toxic materials, and other potentially objectionable impacts. It is the intent of the City to use these special regulations to supplement the regulations of land uses and development already existing within the adopted Development Code. 17.22.143 PROJECT VISION The Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District (PDO) is intended to provide a comprehensive planning approach to the development of 22.97 acres. The project will include many design features including pedestrian scale of development, unique signage, gathering places, and transit provisions. This is accomplished through its design, development standards and guidelines that will be implemented at the Development Plan stage. A total of two hundred ninety-four (294) apartment units may be developed in the PDO. As depicted on Exhibit A-1, one hundred sixty (160) apartment units may be developed on the upper portion of the PDO ("Upper Site"), which is on the south side, and one hundred thirty-four (134) apartment units may be developed on the lower portion of the PDO ("Lower Site"), which is the North side of the PDO. Large, landscaped buffer areas have been provided within the PDO and the existing single-family development to the east and south. Several obstacles to pedestrian access exist within the PDO, as well as to the existing single-family residential to the east and south, the existing multi -family residential to the north (across Rancho California Road) and the multi -family residential development to the west. A comprehensive sidewalk plan, which has been coordinated 3 with the landscape plan, is included as Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). This plan will foster pedestrian access within the site. When coupled with the existing/proposed pedestrian network, obstacles to pedestrian movement will be greatly reduced. At the time of the Building Department review, the internal access will be reviewed to ensure it complies with the current California Building Code. 17.22.144 RELATIONSHIP WITH THE DEVELOPMENT CODE AND CITYWIDE DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Only multi -family residential land use shall be allowed in the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. 1. Development Standards. a. The development standards in the Development Code (Chapter 17.06) that would apply to any development within a Medium Density Residential zoning district that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete for the PDO except as approved along with this application. This includes site open space and private open space requirements, as well as overall project density. b. Off -Street Parking and Loading Requirements per Chapter 17.24 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. c. Water Efficient Landscape Design Requirements per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code will apply to the PDO. 2. Design Guidelines. The City -Wide Design Guidelines that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. a. Chapter 5 (Multi -Family Residential Design Guidelines) for the PDO. 3. Approval Authority. The Conceptual Site Plan is depicted in Exhibits A-1 through A-3. Approximate building location, as well as approximate location of parking, drive lanes, and access, are shown on these Exhibits. The Conceptual Landscape Plan is depicted in Exhibit C and the Project Statistics are shown in Exhibits G-1 through G-3. Conformance with these Exhibits, as well as the provisions contained below will allow the Approval Authority for projects approved under PDO-5 as follows: a. The approval requirements contained in the City of Temecula Development Code that are in effect at the time an application is deemed complete within the PDO. 4. Any other relevant rule, regulation or standard that is in effect at the time an application is deemed complete. 17.22.146 USE REGULATIONS M Only multi -family residential land uses shall be allowed in the PDO. 17.22.150 DESIGN AND SETBACK STANDARDS The following standards are designed to increase the compatibility within and adjacent to the PDO. A. Building Setbacks. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the eastern property line, which abuts existing single-family residential development. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. 2. All structures shall be setback a minimum of fifteen feet along the western property line. 3. All structures shall be setback a minimum of forty-five feet along the southerly property line, which also abuts existing single-family residential development. 4. The northern setback from the property line at Rancho California Road shall be twenty-five feet except for the setback at Building 11, which shall be fifteen feet. B. Pedestrian Linkages. Pedestrian linkages shall be provided in accordance with Exhibit B (Sidewalk Plan). C. A pedestrian pathway system shall be provided within the PDO as shown on the Sidewalk Plan. D. Building Height. The height of structures shall not exceed three (3) stories or forty (40) feet in height. E. Trash Enclosures. No trash enclosures shall be permitted along Rancho California Road. All enclosures shall be architecturally compatible with the main building and screened with landscaping. Exact location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage. F. Transit Provisions. Provisions for a transit stop shall be provided. Final location shall be determined at the Development Plan stage, through consultation with the developer, Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) and the City Traffic Engineer. 17.22.152 VEHICULAR CIRCULATION SYSTEM STANDARDS Vehicular Circulation System Standards have been developed to assure that adequate vehicular access ingress and egress exist for the project, that internal project circulation and vehicle stacking are sufficient and that necessary emergency vehicle access requirements are met. A Conceptual Site Plan (Exhibit A) has been prepared with input from the Planning, Public Works and Fire Departments. Locations for buildings, access points from Rancho California Road and the western road, drive lanes, parking lots and parking lot landscaping have been provided on the conceptual plan in an effort to depict the overall development of the site. Minor changes or modifications to the conceptual plan may occur provided they are reviewed and approved by the City of Temecula at the development plan stage. Access Points: One access point to the project has been provided to the site from Rancho California Road and one from the westerly drive that is contiguous to the west property line. 1. Access to the PDO shall be provided from the access point on Rancho California Road. 2. A secondary access has been provided along the existing drive that runs along the PDO's westerly boundary. 17.22.154 ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES Unless expressly stated below, Residential Architectural Guidelines for the PDO are contained within Chapter 5 of the City -Wide Design Guidelines. A. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Form, Height And Massing The Guidelines contained below correspond to the Conceptual Building Elevations (Elevations), contained in Exhibit D. Final design of the individual buildings will utilize the design concepts depicted on the Elevations and may vary from the Elevations depicted in ExhibitD. • Buildings shall not exceed forty feet (40') in height. • Offsets in planes shall be used to reduce the mass of building walls, accent entry areas, and create architectural interest. • Building forms shall be of simple geometry with sculptural or traditional forms acceptable. • Pediment entries, colorful window and door trim shall be used for accent purposes. • Building entries shall be defined and articulated through the use of items such as columns and stone veneers. • Recessed windows and entryways shall be used, especially at the ground level as they add interest tothe product. • Windows or window -type elements are encouraged on second story elements. • Windows on the second floor shall line up with windows on the first floor, making the column/structure apparent. • All sides of the buildings shall receive adequate detail treatment; however, reduced articulation shall be permitted for those sides of the buildings that are not clearly visible from public view. 2. Colors & Materials The colors and materials for the PDO shall be consistent with the color and material boards (Exhibit F). The purpose of the color and material board is to provide continuity between the components of the Rendezvous PDO. A. Colors The predominant building color includes a mixture of earth tones (grays, whites, yellows, tans and browns), similar to colors already used throughout the City of Temecula, other Southern California cities, Warm or light colors are the mostappropriate for trim. Brighter colors shall be limited to signs, doors, window trim and other detailing related to pedestrian areas. B. Materials • Cement Plaster, or similar materials will be used predominantly throughout as will manufactured natural color stone, wood trellis and traditionally inspired concrete red "S" the roofing. • Textured concrete tiles may be used on building elevations. • High quality, dark colored roofing, such as concrete S the are recommended. • Beams, posts and wooden or stone columns shall be simple with camps and toes. Care should be taken so that the width of the column is in proportion to the scale of the building. 3. Roof Forms • Roofs shall be high enough to hide rooftop equipment. • Varied roof heights shall be incorporated to reduce building massing. • The use of cornices is strongly encouraged. B. LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES 1. Project -Wide Landscaping The landscape theme is intended to support the architectural guidelines by creating screens and buffers where needed and views where opportunities exist. Guidelines: Plant material selection for street trees shall be determined by the City -Wide Design Guidelines and the Temecula Municipal Code, which shall complement the existing street trees on Rancho California Road. Introduced plant materials will be installed so that they reflect the surrounding plant species. Irrigation systems shall include low flow drip systems, consistent with the Section 17.32 of the City's Development Code (Water -Efficient Landscape Design). 2. Project Edges Project edges will be the most visible components of the project. The intent is to provide a comprehensive landscape approach to the project, while paying attention to the particular needs of each edge condition. Plans and Sections are provided to guide future Development Plans in these areas. The Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections are included as Exhibit C. a. Rancho California Road Edae Landscaping along Rancho California Road shall be complimentary to existing landscaping along Rancho California Road, as well as serve to identify the project. Streetscape plantings will be coordinated with interior streetscape and parking treatments as well as with adjacent parcel landscaping. An enhanced project entry will provide a gateway into the project. Reference Exhibits C-1 (Plan) and C-1a (Section): Rancho California Road / Lower Site. . b. Residential (External) /Residential Edge This edge shall serve to buffer the proposed development from the existing single-family residential to the east. A minimum fifteen (15) foot landscape buffer shall be required from the eastern property line to any structure. Evergreen trees with broad canopies may be utilized to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibits C-3 and C-3a: Lower Site Interface at East. The height of the buildings along the eastern set back shall not exceed sixteen feet. c. Residential (Internal)/Residential (External) Edge Slopes created on the eastern and southern slopes shall be extensively landscaped to meet current City Development Code standards. Since these are down slopes of various lengths, trees and shrubs are provided near the top of the slope to allow for maximum privacy for the existing single-family residents. Reference Exhibit C-4 (Section): Upper Site Interface at East and Exhibit C-5 (Section): Upper Site Interface atSouth. 3. Major Entries Special landscaping will occur at the Rancho California Entry that will identify the points of entry and set the tone for the PDO. Plantings will be coordinated with the Rancho California Road edge. Clear views for traffic safety and project signage must be maintained. Enhanced vehicular and pedestrian access will identify major entries, as follows. 17.22.156 Incorporation of Exhibits. All development within the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay District shall conform and comply with the requirements set forth in the following Exhibits, which exhibits are on file in the Official Records of the City Clerk and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full and which are also reduced in size to be included in the Zoning Code Text: Exhibit 17.22.156 A-1 through A-3. Conceptual Site Plans Exhibit 17.22.156 B. Sidewalk Plan Exhibit 17.22.156 C. Landscape Plan and Section Legend, Plans and Sections Exhibit 17.22.156 D. Entry Monument Signs Exhibit 17.22.156 E-1 through E-8. Conceptual Building Elevations Exhibit 17.22.156 F. Color and Material Board S 7-22-IMMEM i, -i L on.. �o41s( EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.156 C LANDSCAPE PLAN AND SECTION LEGEND, PLANS AND SECTIONS Exhibit C-1: Landscape Plan View Rancho California Road / Lower Site Exhibit C-1 a Section 1-1 Rancho California Rd. / Lower Site Exhibits C-2 Plan View Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3 Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-3a Section 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibits C-4 6-6 Upper Site Interface at East Exhibits C-5 Section 7-7 Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-6 Plan View Upper Site Interface at South Exhibits C-7 Elevation Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-8 Plan View Major Entry Monument Exhibit C-9 Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 1) Exhibit C-9a Plan View Enhanced Paving (Alternate 2) 10 -l-C 2J� � � L11 �• } T 17 rI ;� � • f I r � r PLAN VIEW Lower Site Interface at East Nis Exhibit C-2 Section A HOUSE dim Section C Section D SECTION 3-3 Lower Site Interface at East Exhibit C-3a BROAD CANOPY DECIDUOUS TREE TYPICAL BROAD CANOPY EVERGREEN TREE TYPICAL SLOPE OROUNOCOVER & SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL LARGE WKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL .7 I11. M-FAMLY 2:1 SLOPE; DIARIES VARIES FF.SDENTIAL VARIES NATURAL OPEN SPACE VARIES SECTION - � U p per S i to Interface East NTS 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPICAL RF_AR YARD VARIES SWCLE FAMILY FDETiAL I Fes! I I:III.-11 {EXISTING WOOD FENCE TYPICAL Exhibit C-4 R STEEL FENCE TrPIM VINES ATTACHED BROW�Fi4�111{{S.ViI7 ''WW77 DITCH REAR YARD 2:1 SLOPE VARIES VAeR I E SEC310 - Upper Site Interface at So& NTS LAKE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYPICAL -�-� MALL EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE TYPICAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. SQL FLOWERING ACCENT SHRUB MASSING 7Y?lCAL TIDAL DED1DUCLIS ACCENT TREE 'TYPICAL - 14 tp `- muuF Y FE0De0VL -111 1 i 1 r 11111 11 i =i 41=111— I 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYPICAL a 9 1--1 PQ h} ICh n M T'7 sEcTlox 17.22.155 C LARGE BACKGROUND SHRUB MASS NC TYPICAL BRW CANCPY RCREEN TREE TYP)CAL MEDIUM FOREGROUND SHRUB MASSING TYP. PYRAMIDAL EV'E R£EN TREE TYPI kL - 8' TUBULAR STEEL FENCE TYPICAL. SMALL EVERGREEN SCREEN TREE TYPIM PYRAMIDAL DECIDUOUS AC ENT TREE TYPICAL 5' CONCRETE SIDEWALK TYPICAL upv �T SINGLE' FAMILY RESIDE TIC. PLAN VIE Upper Site Interface t South NTIS 23 H Chiseled limestone face with concrete cap and base Raised metal letters Date Palms Decorative pots Evergreen trees f Flowering shrubs I Flowering groundcover E, EZVOU, S,r IF . 1.. ELEVATION Major Entry Monument nts RANCHO CALIFORNIARO. - _ " r PROJECT SIGNAGE ACCENT PLANTING 1 INTERLOCKING PAVERS I i CONCRETE BANDS f�; ALTERNATING EVERGREEN TREES AND PALMS FLOWERING SHRUBS v d v f a ��J I • VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN ENTRY GATES I PLAN VIEW Major Entry Monument nts Exhibit C-a Guidelines: Accent trees with fall or flowering color should be used as identify plantings. Low -scale walls, shrubs, and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used to highlight key areas, such as the base of project entry monuments. Trees should be massed to create an effect similar to native plantings in undisturbed areas. 11 Secondary Entry The secondary entry is located at the westerly edge of the project along an un-named road between this project and the multi -family development to the west. Design elements may include accent plantings, low scale walls, and monumentation. Guidelines: • Shrubs and groundcovers with annual or perennial color should be used at the base of project entry monumentation. • Accent trees, such as palm trees or crape myrtle varieties should be used to identify entries. 12 Project -Wide Hardscape Concept Hardscape elements shall be used in coordination with the architecture and landscaping to provide a link between the street edge and the development. Attention to hardscape details creates a strong sense of community by relating different areas of the developments to an overriding theme. In addition, property hardscaping can improve pedestrian safety, movement and visual enjoyment of public areas. a. Pavina Materials The use of enriched paving treatment has been recommended for the major entry into the site and intersections to highlight key areas of the streetscape. Guidelines: Paving materials that incorporate natural rock or stone are highly recommended. Major intersection and project entry crosswalks shall be highlighted by enriched paving treatments such as stamped, colored concrete, interlocking pavers or cobblestones to visually denote crosswalks. Near buildings, paving materials should be consistent with major intersection treatments, using interlocking pavers, cobblestone, natural stone, ortextured concrete. 13 EXHIBIT SECTION .17.22.156 C SMOOTH CONCRETE BANOS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL Enhanced Alternate FREE STANDING PILASTER W/ DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE & BUILT-IN LAMP TYPICAL at Intersection EXHIBIT SECTION 17.22.1S6 C INTERLOCKING PAVERS TYPICAL c� SMOOTH CONCRETE BANDS TYPICAL EXPOSED AGGREGATE CONCRETE ACCENT TYPICAL COBBLE STAMPED COLORED CONCRETE TYPICAL--- I & tSUIL PLAN VIEW (2 Enhanced Paving at Intersection Alternate 2 NTS 15 b. Street Furniture Hardscape elements such as benches, bollards, paving and light standards shall reflect the theme of the overall PDO, complimenting the architecture and landscape. Materials used in construction of street furniture should complement architectural materials used on adjacent buildings. Safety and durability need special consideration. Guidelines: • Natural stone, rock, textured concrete, wood, or metal are all acceptable building materials for street furniture. • Street furniture should be located within gathering and/or shaded seating areas within the property. • All benches should be of simple design of wrought -iron metal, or concrete with supports and scroll detailing and finished natural wood slats for the sitting area. • Trash receptacles and other minor details must relate to the architectural style of buildings. 16 ®1S SIITLIH 17.22.156 C BENCH c. Walls and Fences When necessary for security or to mitigate grading, walls or retaining walls and fences shall reinforce the project's identity and image. The material, style, and height of walls and fences shall in order to ensure visual consistency, provide an element of continuity throughout the property. Guidelines: • Construction materials and colors shall be consistent with the project architecture with dark -toned hues and earthtone colors preferred. The use of a hedge/bollard treatment is acceptable and encouraged. • For walls built to screen ancillary structures adjacent to buildings, such as trash enclosures, construction materials should complement the architecture. • The horizontal mass of continuous walls should be softened by landscape planting and vines. • Tubular steel or an equivalent may be used for fencing. 4. Lighting Concept In the design of lighting, careful consideration must be given the overall architectural theme as well as to the safety of the site users. An emphasis should be made to emphasize human scale in public areas adjacent to buildings and along walks. Guidelines: • Warm white lighting is encouraged, bright colored or blinking lights shall not be allowed. • Light standards will blend architecturally with buildings, pedestrian areas, and other hardscape elements. • Design and placement of site lighting must minimize glare affecting adjacent properties, buildings and roadways. • Natural stone and concrete may be used for light standard bases. • All lighting shall be consistent with the Mt. Palomar Lighting Ordinance. • "Old town Style" lighting fixtures, either attached to building or pedestal mounted along pedestrian walkways and gathering areas shall be utilized. 17 EXHIBIT SECTION 17. 22.156 C LIGHTING STANDARD 5. Monument Signs a. General Requirements • All portions of Entry Monuments including the base and cap, shall be constructed with materials and colors as shown on Exhibit F. All monument signs shall include the name of the project and the lettering shall be no higher than 19" and no smaller than three inches (3") in height. Low growing shrubs, groundcover and/or annual color shall surround the base of the sign. 19 0 0 o o Sohn Watson ® ® ® ® ® ® Architects, Inc. Way Sa726 nta Santa arr bara Sa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 �• FMA _. :. . BuildingT #12 (Type G ) End Elevation Color Scheme 2 3/16" - 1'-0" 14 w° CQi W U O\ � N O � � 30063 —_ 30063 Qa U m 41 -- r ®® �� d � Q Q PA20-1325 ®® I �� inii� �� F�M11L N n Building #12 (Type G) Side Elevation Copyright Color Scheme 2 o DATE 3/16" =1'-0" sx a Rendezvous Phase II Color Schemes and Materials Color Scheme #1 Scheme #2 Scheme #3 Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Scheme#7 Scheme #8 Integral Plaster Color Similar To: Description 1 Omega #20 Body Color I Body Color 2 Body Clr Body Clr DE6155 Soft Ivory Light Cream 2 Omega #2-1/2 A 948 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DE6312 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grey/Green 3 Omega #413 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 DET654 Creme Fraiche Light/Medium Cream 4 Omega #A 560 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DET605 Drifting Doumstream Dark "Dull" Green 5 Omega #414 Body Color 1 Body Clr DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray 6 Omega #1/2 A 865 Body Color 1 DET665 Grain Mill Medium Cream/Oranme 7 Omega #418 Body Clr DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brawn COLOR 8 Omega #18 Trim Trim Trim Trim Entry Trm Trim Trim Trim DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whitish SCHEME 9 Boral Tesoro Blend Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile B-317- R Roof Bundle Taupe - Same Color G 10 DE158 Nor[hem Territory All Doors All Doors All Doors DEA 158 Northern Territory —pprx Dark Br— -Semi-Gloss BUILDING I I French Limestone "Ryland Buff' Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile I Wall Tile I Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 SCHEME 2 12 Chiseled Limestone "Cavenpe" Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 13 Sand Canvon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile A6.2 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Bind" Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt N=,CohwSchemc#lnotmedonPhasI Exhibit E— I 0l 0j Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) End Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32" = P-0" mono RI '.' IIIIIIIIII� IIIIIIIIII� '' :: :: Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) Long Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32"= V_0"__________ ::No umom 0000 0000 0000 iiiiiil IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Iliiiiiiiiiiiliiiliii IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... Buildings #14 and #17 (Type 3A) Short Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 -41 Exhibit E-3 Sohn Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chetham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 PA20-1325 10. SCHEME BUILDING 3A A6-4 Sohn Watson a2 la ,roe=.�.��, Architects, Inc. 726 Chethant Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 0 �i OO ® �i � � — (805)-969-7280 MM r'1 ®ME JT] ®®0063 Tj _06 w L ME w Building #11 (Type H) rx End Elevation ° Color Scheme 4 a o 3/32" = P-0" q U. W U D\ y � � 7 �i . P1 ix; o c 3 d a F OO OO OO o PA20-1325 30063 30063 4 Copyright DATE -_-_ �rmmm��mmm�� Buildings #11 (Type H) Long Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 COLOR 3/32" = 1'-0" SCHEME BUILDING H SCHEME A6-5 Exhibit E-4 Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage Ph Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Color Schcvic XB Color9cFcmc XB .iiwm, a„wWimr Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Gera a Color Scheme Assi ents Typical Garage Trash Enclosure With �n -,.a Bldg #16/Garage 38 Fnd Fl—firm North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Scheme #5 East Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 West and South Elevation 1/8" = 11-0 Color Scheme #5 ILw.nc. Pool Bathrooms North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 r7-- T �Pool Bathrooms South Elevation Eathrouin Shower Glcvation Elevation Along Enhy Walk a Garage #35 with Mail Room North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" P Garage #35 with Mail Room South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" Garage #35 with Mail Room West Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" Garage #35 with Mail room East Elevation Exhibit E-5 Sohn Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME SMALLER A6.6 Color Scheme #1 "Left and Right" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 Color Scheme #1 "Front and Back" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 2 Story Apartment Building Color Scheme Assignments Color Scheme #2 "Front and Back" Building Type 2A 1/811 = 11-0t1 "Left and Right" Building Type 2A 1 /811 = 11-011 Building 2 Scheme 1 with Base Tile Building 3 Scheme 2 with Base Tile Building 4 Sche1 with Base Tile Alt Building 8 Schememe 2 with Base Tilc Alt Project Color Schemes and Materials Leasing Pool Baths 2 Story Bldg 2 Story Bldg 3 Story Bldg 3 Story Bldg Exercise Garage Garage Garage Color Scheme #1 Scheme 42 Scheme #3 Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Sche=#7 Scheme #8 Comment Description 1 Omega #20 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Body Ch Body Clr Formally DE6155 Soft Ivory Light Cream 2 Omega #2-1/2 A 948 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Formally DE6312 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grey/Green 3 Omega #413 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 Formally DET654 Creme Fraische Light/Medium Cream 4 Omega #A 560 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 Formally DET605 Drifting Downstream Dark "Dull" Green 5 Omega 9414 Body Color 1 Body Clr Formally DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray 6 Omega #1/2 A 865 Body Color 1 Formally DET665 Grain Mill Medium Cream/Orange 7 Omega #418 Body Ch Formally DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brown 8 Omega #18 Trim Trim Trim Trim Entry Trm Trim Trim Trim Formally DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whitish 9 Bond Tesoro Blend Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Formally B-317- R Roof Bandle Taupe - Apprx Same Color 10 DE158 Northern Territory All Doors All Doors All Doors Formally DEA 158 Northern Territory Dark Brown - Semi -Gloss 11 French Limestone "Ryland Buff' Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 Wall Tile 1 12 Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 13 Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Bind" Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Base Tile Alt Exhibit E-6 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME 2STORY A6.1 John Watson Color Scheme#3 Color Schcnia ?4 Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 ® ® ® ff ® in �e ® ��JE "Left" "Left" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" w Color sd- c #3 Color Scheme 14 a� O101 O O O O 101 O O O masc^w,i O ' ® Q ® IQmill n. U N 4 U "Top" "Top" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A `� H 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" PA18-1380 Color Scheme #3 Color Scheme #4 O O O O O O O O O O Copyright .,. DATE Q Q Q Q Q LOA "Bottom" 'Bottom" Building Type 3A Building Type 3A 3/32" = F-0" 3/32" = F-0" COLOR SCHEME Apartment Building 3 STORY 3 Story P g BUILDLINGS Color Scheme Assignments Building 1 Scb—e 4 with Base Tile Building 5 Scheme 4 with Base Tile Alt A6-2 Building 6 Scheme 3 with Base Tile Alt Building Scheme3with B—Tile Exhibit E-7 Typical Garage MTrash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage Wlth Trash Enclosure Game Color Scheme Assimunents Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Wln _ ���■ ����� MEND �� .I: ���■ ����� moms �� ■�■ ���■ ����� moms _ �� ... �e!;st■ ����� momzs: 2: as: 2.. mom � ";' �2 11,1q, ICI � -- IIII .I ,I =Mn mom i II IIII MnM- -------------------------- II II. nm NONE 111mm�n 11 11 nmm�n n nm �ersl� nm North Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Schcmc A� East Flcration 1'-o West and South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 Color Scheme #5 Ellwu re . Pool Bathrooms North Elevation 1/8" = P-0 Tool Bathrooms South Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0 -'1 Bathroom Shower Elevation Elevation Along Enhv Walk 1/8 1 0 1/8" 1'-0 Exhibit E-8 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 SCHEME 3STORY A6.3 Color 1: Omega #20 (Similar to DE 6155 Soft Ivory) Color 2: Omega #2-1/2 A948 (Similar to DE 6312 Dusty Dream) Color 6: Omega #1/2 A 865 (Similar to DET665 Grain Mill) Color 7: Omega #418 (Similar to DE6200 Handwoven) Color 3: Omega #413 Color 8: Omega #18 (Similar to DET654 (Similar to DEW325 Creme Fraische) Vanilla Shake) Color 4: Omega #A 560 (Similar to DET605 Drifting Downstream) Color 5: Omega #414 (Similar to DE6380 Clouded Vision) i ` i rAh4,. i 64, � :4 arm h4, � :4 r,64, C4 rA L4 , r,64, 6 r'Ah. i. .� ra 64 rj h4. ,rok4 rA k4 ra: , 4 ra4, rA i. r,64, r�4 i. rA: 0A VA VA VA VA V4 VA VA V4 Color 10: DEA 15 8 Northern Territory) "McNichols Grecian 17840032 Used at Gas Meter Doors 1 Roof Tile: Tesoro Blend Barcelona 900 Boral Roofing White Vinyl Window Colosseum Travertine "Roman" Chiseled Limestone "Cayenne" Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" French Limestone " French White " Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Blend" Exhibit F John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 0 ct � � o o � ct Cct ct ct �D PA20-1325 Johj A CRMaCA\-� Copyright 0 I DATE November 6, 2020 February 1, 2021 MATERIALS A6.1 RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. E. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-19 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944- 370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)." G. At the conclusion of the Planning Commission hearing and after due consideration of the entire record before the Planning Commission hearing, and after due consideration of the testimony regarding the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022- 22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED `A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325). "' H. On August 23, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. I. Following the public hearing, the Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)." Resolution No. 2022- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. J. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Legislative Findings. The City Council in approving the Project, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code Section, 17.05.010, hereby finds, determines and declares that: N A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment the project site will allow for a multifamily residential community. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended toprotect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment, and Development Code. The project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Conditions of Approval. The City Council of the City of Temecula approves Planning Application No. PA20-1325, a Development Plan application for a 134 unit apartment community, subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth in Exhibit A, attached hereto, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. , "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." Section 5. Certification. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA20-1325 Project Description: A Development Plan to allow for the construction of a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres located within the existing PDO-5 on the south side of Rancho California Road, 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-001 944-370-005 944-370-006 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-012 944-370-013 MSHCP Category: Residential (Greater Than 14.1 du/ac) DIF Category: Residential -Attached TUMF Category: Residential -Multi -Family Quimby Category: Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units) New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) Approval Date: August 23, 2022 Expiration Date: August 23, 2025 PLANNING DIVISION Within 48 Hours of the Approval Page 1 of 19 Applicant Filing Notice of Determination. APPLICANTACTION REQUIRED: The applicant/developer is responsible for filing the Notice of Determination for the Mitigated or Negative Declaration required under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and California Code of Regulations Section 15075 within 48 hours of the project approval. If within said 48-hour period the applicant/ developer has not filed the Notice of Determination as required above, the approval for the project granted shall be void due to failure of this condition Failure to submit the Notice of Determination will also result in an extended period of time for legal challenges. FEES: Fees for the Notice of Determination are Two Thousand Five Hundred and Ninety -Eight Dollars ($2,598.00) which includes the Two Thousand Five Hundred and Forty- Eight Dollars ($2,548.00) fee, required by Fish and Wildlife Code Section 711.4(d)(3) plus the Fifty Dollars ($50.00) County administrative fee. The County of Riverside charges additional fees for credit card transactions. FILING: The City shall provide the applicant with a Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval via email. If the applicant/developer has not received the Notice of Determination within 24 hours of approval, they shall contact the case Planner immediately. All CEQA documents must be filed online with the Riverside County Assessor — County Clerk- Recorder. A direct link to the CEQA filings page is available at TemeculaCA.gov/CEQA. COPY OF FILINGS: The applicant shall provide the City with a digital copy of the required filings within 48 hours. General Requirements 2. Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. Page 2of19 Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved Development Plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. 4. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved Development Plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. Consistency with Planned Development Overlay. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) 6. Conformance with Approved Plans. The development of the premises shall substantially conform to the approved site plan and elevations contained on file with the Planning Division. 7. Signage Permits. A separate building permit shall be required for all signage. 8. Landscape Maintenance. Landscaping installed for the project shall be continuously maintained to the reasonable satisfaction of the Director of Community Development. If it is determined that the landscaping is not being maintained, the Director of Community Development shall have the authority to require the property owner to bring the landscaping into conformance with the approved landscape plan. The continued maintenance of all landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer or any successors in interest. 9. Graffiti. All graffiti shall be removed within 24 hours on telecommunication towers, equipment, walls, or other structures. 10. Burrowing Owl Study Submittal. A Burrowing Owl Study shall be submitted prior to plan check approval for the grading permit. If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 11. Water Quality and Drainage. Other than stormwater, it is illegal to allow liquids, gels, powders, sediment, fertilizers, landscape debris, and waste from entering the storm drain system or from leaving the property. To ensure compliance with this Condition of Approval: a. Spills and leaks shall be cleaned up immediately. b. Do not wash, maintain, or repair vehicles onsite. c. Do not hose down parking areas, sidewalks, alleys, or gutters. d. Ensure that all materials and products stored outside are protected from rain. e. Ensure all trash bins are covered at all times. Page 3of19 12. Materials and Colors. The Conditions of Approval specified in this resolution, to the extent specific items, materials, equipment, techniques, finishes or similar matters are specified, shall be deemed satisfied by City staffs prior approval of the use or utilization of an item, material, equipment, finish or technique that City staff determines to be the substantial equivalent of that required by the Conditions of Approval. Staff may elect to reject the request to substitute, in which case the real party in interest may appeal, after payment of the regular cost of an appeal, the decision to the Planning Commission for its decision. Material Color Stucco Dusty Dream (DE6312) Stucco Handwoven (DE6200) Garage Door Northern Territory (DEA158) Stucco Soft Ivory (DE6155) Stucco Vanilla Shake (DEW325) Stucco Clouded Vision (DE6380) Stucco Creme Fraiche (DET654) Stucco Drifting Downstream (DET605) Stucco Grain Mill (DET665) French Limestone French White Storefront Dark Bronze Clay Roof S Tile Barcelona Colosseum Travertine Roman Chiseled Limestone Cayenne San Canyon Flagstone Cream Chiseled Limestone Sunriver Blend 13. Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. Page 4of19 14. Trash Enclosures. The trash enclosures shall be large enough to accommodate a recycling bin, as well as regular solid waste containers. Trash enclosures shall have working locking mechanisms on all access gates, including pedestrian access gates, that shall remain locked and accessible only to authorized users (residents, commercial tenants, etc.) during times when pick up service is not scheduled. Trash enclosures shall have anti -dumping design features incorporated into the design of the trash enclosure, which prevent the transfer of materials over or around the trash enclosure. Anti -dumping features must be designed in complimentary design manner to the existing or proposed building, and shall not include chain link fence, razor wire, or barbed wire." The area between the top of the wall and the top of the enclosure shall not remain open and available for dumping or other activities. 15. Trash Enclosures. Trash enclosures shall be provided to house all trash receptacles utilized on the site. These shall be clearly labeled on the site plan. 16. Covered Trash Enclosures. All trash enclosures on site shall include a solid cover and the construction plans shall include all details of the trash enclosures, including the solid cover. 17. Construction and Demolition Debris. The developer shall contact the City's franchised solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris and shall provide the Planning Division verification of arrangements made with the City's franchise solid waste hauler for disposal of construction and demolition debris. Only the City's franchisee may haul demolition and construction debris. 18. Public Art Ordinance. The applicant shall comply with the requirements of the City's Public Art Ordinance as defined in Chapter 5.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 19. Property Maintenance. All parkways, including within the right-of-way, entryway median, landscaping, walls, fencing, recreational facilities, and on -site lighting shall be maintained by the property owner or maintenance association. Page 5of19 20. Fiscal Impact Analysis Compliance. The Project is required to address impacts to the City's budget as a result of the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the Project area substantially exceeding the municipal revenue generated from the Project ("City Services Deficit"). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated June 9, 2022 ("FIA"), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City a minimum sum as described in the June 9, 2022 Final FIA per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount as described in the June 9, 2022 Final FIA, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. "Occupied Residential Property" means an assessor's parcel within the project for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City's budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this recurring financial obligation to the City through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this Condition remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit 21. Placement of Transformer. Provide the Planning Division with a copy of the underground water plans and electrical plans for verification of proper placement of transformer(s) and double detector check valves prior to final agreement with the utility companies. 22. Placement of Double Detector Check Valves. Double detector check valves shall be installed at locations that minimize their visibility from the public right-of-way, subject to review and approval by the Director of Community Development. 23. Discovery of Cultural Resources. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "If cultural resources are discovered during the project construction (inadvertent discoveries), all work in the area of the find shall cease, and the qualified archaeologist and the Pechanga monitor shall investigate the find, and make recommendations as to treatment." Page 6of19 24. Burrowing Owl Grading Note. The following shall be included in the Notes Section of the Grading Plan: "No grubbing/clearing of the site shall occur prior to scheduling the pre -grading meeting with Public Works. All project sites containing suitable habitat for burrowing owls, whether owls were found or not, require a 30-day preconstruction survey that shall be conducted within 30 days prior to ground disturbance to avoid direct take of burrowing owls. If the results of the survey indicate that no burrowing owls are present on -site, then the project may move forward with grading, upon Planning Division approval. If burrowing owls are found to be present or nesting on -site during the preconstruction survey, then the following recommendations must be adhered to: Exclusion and relocation activities may not occur during the breeding season, which is defined as March 1 through August 31, with the following exception: From March 1 through March 15 and from August 1 through August 31 exclusion and relocation activities may take place if it is proven to the City and appropriate regulatory agencies (if any) that egg laying or chick rearing is not taking place. This determination must be made by a qualified biologist." If construction is delayed or suspended for more than 30 days after the survey, the area shall be resurveyed. 25. Human Remains. If human remains are encountered, California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to California Public Resources Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. If the Riverside County Coroner determines the remains to be Native American, the Native American Heritage Commission must be contacted within 24 hours. The Native American Heritage Commission must then immediately identify the "most likely descendant(s)" of receiving notification of the discovery. The most likely descendant(s) shall then make recommendations within 48 hours, and engage in consultations concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code 5097.98 and the Treatment Agreement described in these conditions. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit 26. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The Western Riverside County of Governments administers and collects the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). The City of Temecula adopted an ordinance on March 31, 2003 for a Riverside County area wide Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF). This project is subject to payment of these fees at the time of building permit issuance (paid to WRCOG). The fees are subject to the provisions of Chapter 15.08 of the Temecula Municipal Code and the fee schedule in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Additional information on payment, fees, and points of contact can be found at http://www.wrcog.cog.ca.us/174/TUMF 27. Development Impact Fee (DIF). The developer shall comply with the provisions of Title 15, Chapter 15.06 of the Temecula Municipal Code and all its resolutions by paying the appropriate City fee. 28. Photometric Plan. The applicant shall submit a photometric plan, including the parking lot, to the Planning Division, which meets the requirements of the Development Code and the Riverside County Palomar Lighting Ordinance 655. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. The parking lot light standards shall be placed in such a way as to not adversely affect the growth potential of the parking lot trees. Page 7of19 29. Construction Landscaping and Irriqation Plans. Construction Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Division. These plans shall be submitted as a separate submittal, not as part of the building plans or other plan set. These plans shall conform to the approved conceptual landscape plan, or as amended by these conditions. The location, number, height and spread, water usage or KC value, genus, species, and container size of the plants shall be shown. The plans shall be consistent with the Water Efficient Ordinance and Water Storage Contingency Plan per the Rancho California Water District. The plans shall be accompanied by the appropriate filing fee (per the City of Temecula Fee Schedule at time of submittal) and one copy of the approved Grading Plan. 30. Landscaping Site Inspections. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note stating, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. 31. Agronomic Soils Report. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include a note on the plans stating, "The contractor shall provide two copies of an agronomic soils report at the first irrigation inspection." 32. Water Usage Calculations. The Landscaping and Irrigation Plans shall include water usage calculations per Chapter 17.32 of the Development Code (Water Efficient Ordinance), the total cost estimate of plantings and irrigation (in accordance with approved plan). Applicant shall use evapotranspiration (ETo) factor of 0.70 for calculating the maximum allowable water budget. 33. Landscape Maintenance Program. A landscape maintenance program shall be submitted to the Planning Division for approval. The landscape maintenance program shall detail the proper maintenance of all proposed plant materials to assure proper growth and landscape development for the long-term esthetics of the property. The approved maintenance program shall be provided to the landscape maintenance contractor who shall be responsible to carry out the detailed program. 34. Specifications of Landscape Maintenance Program. Specifications of the landscape maintenance program shall indicate, "Three landscape site inspections are required. The first inspection will be conducted at installation of irrigation while trenches are open. This will verify that irrigation equipment and layout is per plan specifications and details. Any adjustments or discrepancies in actual conditions will be addressed at this time and will require an approval to continue. Where applicable, a mainline pressure check will also be conducted. This will verify that the irrigation mainline is capable of being pressurized to 150 psi for a minimum period of two hours without loss of pressure. The second inspection will verify that all irrigation systems are operating properly, and to verify that all plantings have been installed consistent with the approved construction landscape plans. The third inspection will verify property landscape maintenance for release of the one-year landscape maintenance bond." The applicant/owner shall contact the Planning Division to schedule inspections. Page 8of19 35. Irrigation. The landscaping plans shall include automatic irrigation for all landscaped areas and complete screening of all ground mounted equipment from view of the public from streets and adjacent property for private common areas; front yards and slopes within individual lots; shrub planting to completely screen perimeter walls adjacent to a public right-of-way equal to 66 feet or larger; and, all landscaping excluding City maintained areas and front yard landscaping which shall include, but may not be limited to, private slopes and common areas. 36. Hardscaping. The landscape plans shall include all hardscaping for pedestrian trails within private common areas. 37. Wall and Fence Plans. Wall and fence plans shall be consistent with the Conceptual Landscape Plans showing the height, location and the following materials for all walls and fences: • Tubular steel fencing around the pool area and northern, eastern, and western boundaries. - Geogrid retaining wall in front of Building 11 38. Precise Grading Plans. Precise Grading Plans shall be consistent with the approved rough grading plans including all structural setback measurements. 39. Building Construction Plans for Outdoor Areas. Building Construction Plans shall include detailed outdoor areas (including but not limited to trellises, decorative furniture, fountains, hardscape, etc.) to match the style of the building subject to the approval of the Director of Community Development. 40. WQMP Landscape Compliance. The construction landscape plans shall be consistent with Appendix A, Table 31 of the Low Impact Development (LID) Manual for Southern California for plant materials and treatment facilities, and shall reference the approved precise grading plan for WQMP features. 41. Utility Screening. All utilities shall be screened from public view. Landscape construction drawings shall show and label all utilities and provide appropriate screening. Provide a three-foot clear zone around fire check detectors as required by the Fire Department before starting the screen. Group utilities together in order to reduce intrusion. Screening of utilities is not to look like an after -thought. Plan planting beds and design around utilities. Locate all light poles on plans and ensure that there are no conflicts with trees. 42. Smoking in Residential Units. Per Municipal Code Chapter 17.30, "Smoking in Multi -Unit Residences," the developer shall submit a site plan to the City for review and approval, designating a minimum of 25 percent of the units within the project as non-smoking units. 43. Community Wide Public Benefit. The applicant shall provide a cash payment in the amount of $500,000.00 to the City of Temecula prior to issuance of the first residential multi family or commercial building permit. This payment will fulfill the requirements of the Growth Management Plan for the proposed project. 44. Fiscal Impact Analysis Covenant. The owner of record shall record a covenant, in a form satisfactory to the city attorney, which shall place future buyers of the residential dwelling units on notice of their obligation to pay the City the sum as provided in the Fiscal Impact Analysis on file with the City of Temecula. The covenant shall be recorded in the official records of the County of Riverside prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit, and a copy of the covenant shall be filed with the office of the city clerk. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit Page 9of19 45. Letter of Substantial Conformance. The applicant shall submit a letter of substantial conformance, subject to field verification by the Director of Community Development or his/her designee. Said letter of substantial conformance shall be prepared by the project designer and shall indicate that all plant materials and irrigation system components have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape and irrigation plans. Such letter of substantial conformance shall be submitted prior to scheduling for the final inspection. 46. Screening of Loadinq Areas. The applicant shall be required to screen all loading areas and roof mounted mechanical equipment from view of public right-of-ways. If upon final inspection it is determined that any mechanical equipment, roof equipment or backs of building parapet walls are visible from any portion of the public right-of-way adjacent to the project site, the developer shall provide screening by constructing a sloping tile covered mansard roof element or other screening reviewed and approved by the Director of Community Development. 47. Landscape Installation Consistent with Construction Plans. All required landscape planting and irrigation shall have been installed consistent with the approved construction plans and shall be in a condition acceptable to the Director of Community Development. The plants shall be healthy and free of weeds, disease, or pests. The irrigation system shall be properly constructed and in good working order. 48. Performance Securities. Performance securities, in amounts to be determined by the Director of Community Development, to guarantee the maintenance of the plantings in accordance with the approved construction landscape and irrigation plan, shall be filed with the Planning Division for a period of one year from final Certificate of Occupancy. After that year, if the landscaping and irrigation system have been maintained in a condition satisfactory to the Director of Community Development, the bond shall be released upon request by the applicant. 49. Installation of Site Improvements. All site improvements, including but not limited to, parking areas and striping shall be installed. 50. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 51. Quimby Requirements. The developer shall satisfy the City's parkland dedication (Quimby) requirement through the payment of in -lieu fees equivalent to 1.63 acres of parkland, based upon the City's then current land evaluation. Said requirement includes a 8.7% credit for private recreational opportunities provided. Outside Agencies 52. Flood Protection. Flood protection shall be provided in accordance with the Riverside County Flood Control Districts transmittal dated December 16, 2020, a copy of which is attached. The fee is made payable to the Riverside County Flood Control Water District by either a cashier's check or money order, prior to the issuance of a grading permit (unless deferred to a later date by the District), based upon the prevailing area drainage plan fee. 53. Compliance with Dept. of Environmental Health. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health's transmittal dated January 22, 2021, a copy of which is attached. Page 10 of 19 54. Compliance with EMWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Eastern Municipal Water District's transmittal dated December 21, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 55. Compliance with RCWD. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Rancho California Water District's transmittal dated December 22, 2020, a copy of which is attached. 56. Compliance with Geotechnical. The applicant shall comply with the recommendations set forth in the Leighton Consulting, Inc. transmittal dated February 4, 2021, a copy of which is attached. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 57. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 58. Entitlement Approval. The developer shall comply with the approved site plan, the conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and other relevant documents approved during entitlement. Any significant omission to the representation of site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 59. Precise Grading Permit. A precise grading permit for on site improvements (outside of public right-of-way) shall be obtained from Public Works. 60. Haul Route Permit. A haul route permit may be required when soils are moved on public roadways to or from a grading site. The developer/contractor is to verify if the permit is required. If so, he shall comply with all conditions and requirements per the City's Engineering and Construction Manual and as directed by Public Works. 61. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 62. Storm Drain Improvement Plans. The developer shall submit storm drain improvement plans if the street storm flows exceeds top of curb for the 10-year storm event and/or is not contained within the street right-of-way for the 100-year storm event. A manhole shall be constructed at right-of-way where a private and public storm drain systems connect. The plans shall be approved by Public Works. 63. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 64. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 65. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS with any underlying maps related to the subject property. 66. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM Page 11 of 19 67. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 68. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification Number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD) Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml 69. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 70. Drainage. All applicable drainage shall be depicted on the grading plan and properly accommodated with onsite drainage improvements and water quality facilities, which shall be privately maintained. Alterations to existing drainage patterns or concentration and/or diverting flows is not allowed unless the developer constructs adequate drainage improvements and obtains the necessary permissions from the downstream property owners. All drainage leaving the site shall be conveyed into a public storm drain system, if possible. The creation of new cross lot drainage is not permitted. 71. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 72. RCFC&WCD Encroachment Permit. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. Page 12 of 19 73. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 74. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 75. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non -compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 76. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 77. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 78. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 79. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 80. Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map Number 38043 shall be approved and recorded. 81. Certifications. Certifications are required from the registered civil engineer -of -record certifying the building pad elevation(s) per the approved plans and from the soil's engineer -of -record certifying compaction of the building pad(s). Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 82. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 83. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 84. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. Page 13 of 19 85. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIVISION General Requirements 86. Final Building and Safety Conditions. Final Building and Safety conditions will be addressed when building construction plans are submitted to Building and Safety for review. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), and related codes which are enforced at the time of building plan submittal. 87. Compliance with Code. All design components shall comply with applicable provisions of the most current edition of the California Building, Plumbing and Mechanical Codes; California Electrical Code; California Administrative Code, Title 24 Energy Code, California Title 24 Disabled Access Regulations, and Temecula Municipal Code as identified in Title 15 of the Temecula Municipal Code. 88. ADA Access. Applicant shall provide details of all applicable disabled access provisions and building setbacks on plans to include: a. Disabled access from the public way to the main entrance of the building. b. Van accessible parking located as close as possible to the main entrance of the building. c. Accessible path of travel from parking to the furthest point of improvement. d. Path of accessibility from parking to furthest point of improvement. e. Accessible path of travel from public right-of-way to all public areas on site, such as trash enclosures, clubhouses, and picnic areas. 89. County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance. Applicant shall submit, at time of plan review, a complete exterior site lighting plan showing compliance with County of Riverside Mount Palomar Ordinance Number 655 for the regulation of light pollution. All streetlights and other outdoor lighting shall be shown on electrical plans submitted to the Building and Safety Division. Any outside lighting shall be hooded and aimed not to shine directly upon adjoining property or public rights -of -way. All exterior LED light fixtures shall be 3,000 kelvin or below. all 91 ", 93. Street Addressing. Applicant must obtain street addressing for all proposed buildings by requesting street addressing and submitting a site plan for commercial or multi -family residential projects or a recorded final map for single-family residential projects. Clearance from TVUSD. A receipt or clearance letter from the Temecula Valley Unified School District shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Department to ensure the payment or exemption from School Mitigation Fees. Obtain Approvals Prior to Construction. Applicant must obtain all building plans and permit approvals prior to commencement of any construction work. Obtaining Separate Approvals and Permits. Trash enclosures, patio covers, light standards, and any block walls will require separate approvals and permits. Solid covers are required over new and existing trash enclosures. Sewer and Water Plan Approvals. On -site sewer and water plans will require separate approvals and permits. Page 14 of 19 95. Hours of Construction. Signage shall be prominently posted at the entrance to the project, indicating the hours of construction, as allowed by the City of Temecula Municipal Code Section 9.20.060, for any site within one -quarter mile of an occupied residence. The permitted hours of construction are Monday through Saturday from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. No work is permitted on Sundays and nationally recognized Government Holidays. 96. House Electrical Meter. Provide a house electrical meter to provide power for the operation of exterior lighting, irrigation pedestals and fire alarm systems for each building on the site. Developments with single user buildings shall clearly show on the plans how the operation of exterior lighting and fire alarm systems when a house meter is not specifically proposed. 97. Protection of drains and penetration. Protection of joints and penetrations in fire resistance -rated assemblies shall not be concealed from view until inspected for all designed fire protection. Required fire seals/fire barriers in fire assemblies at fire resistant penetrations shall be installed by individuals with classification or certification covering the installation of these systems. Provide certification for the installation of each area and certification of compliance for Building Official's approval. 98. Garage Dimensions. Parking spaces within enclosed garages shall have an interior dimension of at least ten feet wide and twenty feet long. All measurements shall be made from the interior walls and any obstructions (including stem walls) shall not satisfy this requirement. The interior wall dimensions shall be on the plans for each garage. The following notes are required on the plans: -Two car garages shall note, "20' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" -Single car garages shall note, "10' x 20' clear with no obstructions (including stem walls)" FIRE PREVENTION General Requirements 99. Fire Hydrants. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set minimum fire hydrant distances per CFC Appendix C. Standard fire hydrants (6" x 4" x (2) 2'/2" outlets) shall be located on fire access roads and adjacent public streets. For all multi -family projects hydrants shall be spaced at 350 feet apart, and shall be located no more than 210 feet from any point on the street or Fire Department access road(s) frontage to a hydrant. The required fire flow shall be available from any adjacent hydrant(s) in the system. The fire line may be required to be a looped system. The upgrade of existing fire hydrants may be required (CFC Appendix C and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 100. Fire Dept. Plan Review. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Prevention Bureau. These conditions will be based on occupancy, use, the California Building Code (CBC), California Fire Code (CFC), and related codes which are in force at the time of building plan submittal. 101. Fire Flow. The Fire Prevention Bureau is required to set a minimum fire flow for the remodel or construction of all commercial and residential buildings per CFC Appendix B. The developer shall provide for this project, a water system capable of delivering 2,500 GPM at 20-PSI residual operating pressure for a 4-hour duration for multi -family projects. The fire flow as given above has taken into account all information as provided. (CFC Appendix B and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Grading Permit(s) 102. Access Road Widths. Fire Department vehicle access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section15.16.020). Page 15 of 19 103. All Weather Access Roads. Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus and shall be with a surface to provide all-weather driving capabilities. Access roads shall be 60,000 lbs. GVW with a minimum of AC thickness of .25 feet. In accordance with Section 3310.1, prior to building construction, all locations where structures are to be built shall have fire apparatus access roads. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 104. Gradient of Access Roads. The gradient for fire apparatus access roads shall not exceed 15 percent (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). 105. Turning Radius. Dead end roadways and streets in excess of 150 feet which have not been completed shall have a turnaround capable of accommodating fire apparatus (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 106. Required Submittals (Fire Underground Water). The developer shall furnish three copies of the water system plans to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval prior to installation for all private water systems pertaining to the fire service loop. Plans shall be signed by a registered civil engineer, contain a Fire Prevention Bureau approval signature block, and conform to hydrant type, location, spacing and minimum fire flow standards. Hydraulic calculations will be required with the underground submittal to ensure fire flow requirements are being met for the on -site hydrants. The plans must be submitted and approved prior to building permit being issued (CFC Chapter 33 and Chapter 5). 107. Required Submittals (Fire Sprinkler Systems). Fire sprinkler plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of sprinkler plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. A set of plans and hydraulic calculations are required for each building structure. A permit will be required for each structure, not model type. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. 108. Required Submittals (Fire Alarm Systems). Fire alarm plans shall be submitted to the Fire Prevention Bureau for approval. Three sets of alarm plans must be submitted by the installing contractor to the Fire Prevention Bureau. A set of plans and permits are required for each structure, not model type. The fire alarm system is required to have a dedicated circuit from the house panel. These plans must be submitted prior to the issuance of building permit. Prior to Issuance of Certificate of Occupancy 109. Address Directory (Multi -Family). A directory display monument sign shall be required for apartment, condominium, townhouse or mobile home parks. Each complex shall have an illuminated diagrammatic layout of the complex which indicates the name of the complex, all streets, building identification, unit numbers, and fire hydrant locations within the complex. Location of the sign and design specifications shall be submitted to and be approved by the Fire Prevention Bureau prior to installation. 110. Gates and Access. All manual and electronic gates on required Fire Department access roads or gates obstructing Fire Department building access shall be provided with the Knox Rapid entry system for emergency access by firefighting personnel (CFC Chapter 5). 111. Hydrant Verification. Hydrant locations shall be identified by the installation of reflective markers (blue dots) (Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). Page 16 of 19 112. Knox Box. A "Knox -Box" shall be provided. The Knox -Box shall be installed a minimum of six feet in height and be located to the right side of the fire riser sprinkler room (CFC Chapter 5). 113. Addressing. New buildings shall have approved address numbers, building numbers or approved building identification placed in a position that is plainly legible and visible from the street or road fronting the property. These numbers shall contrast with their background. Multi -family residential and industrial buildings shall have a minimum of 12-inch numbers with suite numbers being a minimum of six inches in size. (CFC Chapter 5 and Temecula Municipal Code Section 15.16.020). POLICE DEPARTMENT General Requirements 114. Landscape Height. The applicant shall ensure all landscaping surrounding all buildings are kept at a height of no more than three feet or below the ground floor window sills. Plants, hedges and shrubbery shall be defensible plants to deter would-be intruders from breaking into the buildings utilizing lower level windows. 115. Tree Pruning. The applicant shall ensure all trees surrounding all building rooftops be kept at a distance to deter roof accessibility by "would-be burglars." Since trees also act as a natural ladder, the branches must be pruned to have a six-foot clearance from the buildings. 116. Berm Height. Berms shall not exceed three feet in height. 117. Knox Box. Knox boxes with Police access are required at each gate leading into the property. Where access to or within a structure or an area is restricted because of secured opening or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving purposes, the Temecula Police Department is authorized to require a key box to be installed in an approved location. The key box shall be of an approved type and shall contain keys to gain necessary access. 118. Parkinq Lot Lighting. All parking lot lighting shall be energy saving and minimized after hours of darkness and in compliance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 119. Exterior Door Lightinq. All exterior doors shall have a vandal resistant light fixture installed above the door. The doors shall be illuminated with a minimum one -foot candle illumination at ground level, evenly dispersed. 120. Exterior Building Lighting. All lighting affixed to the exterior of buildings shall be wall mounted light fixtures to provide sufficient lighting during hours of darkness. 121. Outdoor Lighting During Non -Business Hours. The applicant shall comply with the Governor's order to address the power crisis. This order became effective March 18, 2001 calling for a substantial reduction from businesses to cut usage during non -business hours. The order, in part, states, "All California retail establishments, including, but not limited to, shopping centers, auto malls and dealerships, shall substantially reduce maximum outdoor lighting capability during non -business hours except as necessary for the health and safety of the public, employees or property." Failure to comply with this order following a warning by law enforcement officials shall be punishable as a misdemeanor with a fine not to exceed $1,000 in accordance with Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations. 122. Commercial or Institutional Grade Hardware. All doors, windows, locking mechanisms, hinges, and other miscellaneous hardware shall be commercial or institution grade. Page 17 of 19 123. Graffiti Removal. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings must be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being discovered. Report all such crimes to the Temecula Police 24-hour dispatch Center at (951) 696-HELP. 124. Alarm System. Upon completion of construction, the buildings shall have a monitored alarm system installed and monitored 24 hours a day by a designated private alarm company to notify the Temecula Police Department of any intrusion. All multi -tenant offices/suites/businesses located within a specific building shall have their own alarm system. This condition is not applicable if the business is opened 24/7. 125. Roof Hatches. All roof hatches shall be painted "International Orange." 126. Rooftop Addressinq. The construction plans shall indicate the application of painted rooftop addressing plotted on a nine -inch grid pattern with 45-inch tall numerals spaced nine inches apart. The numerals shall be painted with a standard nine -inch paint roller using fluorescent yellow paint applied over a contrasting background. The address shall be oriented to the street and placed as closely as possible to the edge of the building closest to the street. 127. ADA Parking. All disabled parking stalls on the premises shall be marked in accordance with Section 22511.8 of the California Vehicle Code. Page 18 of 19 128. Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design. Crime prevention through environmental design as developed by the National Crime Prevention Institute (NCPI) supports the concept that "the proper design and effective use of the built environment can lead to a reduction in the fear and incidence of crime and an improvement in the quality of life." The nine primary strategies that support this concept are included as conditions below: a. Provide clear border definition of controlled space. Examples of border definition may include fences, shrubbery or signs in exterior areas. Within a building, the arrangement of furniture and color definition can serve as a means of identifying controlled space. b. Provide clearly marked transitional zones. Persons need to be able to identify when they are moving from public to semi-public to private space. c. Gathering or congregating areas to be located or designated in locations where there is good surveillance and access control. d. Place safe activities in unsafe locations. Safe activities attract normal users to a location and subsequently render the location less attractive to abnormal users due to observation and possible intervention. e. Place unsafe activities in safe locations. Placing unsafe activities in areas of natural surveillance or controlled access will help overcome risk and make the users of the areas feel safer. f. Redesign the use of space to provide natural barriers. Separate activities that may conflict with each other (outdoor basketball court and children's play area, for example) by distance, natural terrain or other functions to avoid such conflict. g. Improve scheduling of space. The timing in the use of space can reduce the risk for normal users and cause abnormal users to be of greater risk of surveillance and intervention. h. Redesign space to increase the perception of natural surveillance. Abnormal users need to be aware of the risk of detection and possible intervention. Windows and clear lines -of -sight serve to provide such a perception of surveillance. i. Overcome distance and isolation. This strategy may be accomplished through improved communications (portable two-way radios, for example) and design efficiencies, such as the location of restrooms in a public building. 129. Business Security Survey. Businesses desiring a business security survey of their location can contact the Crime Prevention and Plans Unit of the Temecula Police Department at (951) 695-2773. 130. Questions Regarding Conditions. Any questions regarding these conditions should be directed to the Temecula Police Department Crime Prevention and Plans Unit at (951) 695-2773. Page 19 of 19 235635 JASON E. UHLEY General Manager -Chief Engineer City of Temecula W�yQt4puNTY FLpdprp�� a Y V RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Community Development Department 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 Attention: Scott Cooper December 16, 2020 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 951.788.9965 FAX www.rcflood.org Re: PA 20-1325 and Tract 38043 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan Check city land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received November 23, 2020. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail, and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: © This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ❑ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ❑ This project proposes channels, storm drains 36 inches or larger in diameter, or other facilities that could be considered regional in nature and/or a logical extension of the adopted Murrieta Creek Master Drainage Plan. The District would consider accepting ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. 235635 City of Temecula - 2 - December 16, 2020 Re: PA 20-1325 and Tract 38043 ® This project is located within the limits of the District's Murrieta Creek (❑Murrieta Valley ❑x Temecula Valley ❑ Santa Gertrudis Valley ❑Warm Springs Valley) Area Drainage Plan for which drainage fees have been adopted. If the project is proposing to create additional impervious surface area, applicable fees should be paid by cashier's check or money order only to the Flood Control District or City prior to issuance of grading or building permits. Fees to be paid should be at the rate in effect at the time of issuance of the actual permit. ® An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, Temecula Valley — Rancho California Road Storm Drain. For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit Section at 951.955.1266. ❑ The District's previous comments are still valid. GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this project, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, DEBORAH DE CHAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: John Hildebrand SLJ:blm:mc County of Riverside DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH P.O. BOX 7909 • RIVERSIDE, CA 92513-7909 KEITH JONES, DIRECTOR ftwwg People and th, E-rmo w January 22, 2021 City of Temecula Planning Department Attn: Scott Cooper 41000 Main Street Temecula CA 92590 SUBJECT: CITY OF TEMECULA — PA20-1325 TEMECULA VILLAGE PHASE II DP: APN:944-370-001 Dear Mr. Cooper: The project listed in the subject heading is proposing a development plan to allow for the construction of 134 unit apartment community located within the existing PDO-5 on the south side of Rancho California Road, 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive, in the city of Temecula. In accordance with the agreement between the County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health (DEH) and the City of Temecula, DEH offers the following comments for the project(s) listed in the subject heading of this letter: POTABLE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER This project is is proposing to receive potable water from Rancho California Water District (RCWD) and sanitary sewer service from Eastern Municipal Water District(EMWD). It is the responsibility of the developer to ensure that all requirements to obtain potable water and sanitary sewer service are met with EMWD, as well as, all other applicable agencies. As the agency providing sewer service, EMWD shall also have the responsibility to implement any grease interceptor requirements, including sizing capacity and other structural specifications if necessary. All existing septic systems and/or wells shall be properly removed or abandoned under permit with DEH. Office Locations • Blythe • Corona • Hemet • Indio • Murrieta • Palm Springs • Riverside Phone (888)722-4234 www.rivcoeh.org ENVIRONMENTAL CLEANUP PROGRAM Based on the information provided in the environmental assessment document previously submitted for the first phase of this project and did include this APN, and with the provision that the information was accurate and representative of site conditions, RCDEH-ECP (Riverside County Department of Environmental Health — Environmental Cleanup Program) concludes no further environmental assessment is required for this project. If previously unidentified contamination or the presence of a naturally occurring hazardous material is discovered at the site, assessment, investigation, and/or cleanup may be required. Contact Riverside County Environmental Health - Environmental Cleanup Programs at (951) 955-8980, for further information. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS MANAGEMENT BRANCH (HMMB) Prior to conducting a building permit final, the facility shall require a business emergency plan for the storage of any hazardous materials, greater than 55 gallons, 200 cubic feet or 500 pounds, or any acutely hazardous materials or extremely hazardous substances. If further review of the site indicates additional environmental health issues, HMMB reserves the right to regulate the business in accordance with applicable County Ordinances. Please contact HMMB at (951) 358- 5055 to obtain information regarding any additional requirements. DISTRICT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES — PUBLIC/SEMI-PUBLIC FOOD/POOL FACILITY Prior to issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall be required to contact DEH District Environmental Services to determine the appropriate pood plan check and/or permitting requirements. For further information, please call (951) 461-0284. County of Riverside, Department of Environmental Health District Environmental Services - Murrieta Office 38740 Sky Canyon Drive, Suite "A" Murrieta CA 92563 Please contact your local DES office located in Murrieta at (951)461-0284. Should you have any further questions or require further assistance, please contact me by email at kakim&rivco.org or by phone at (951) 955-8980. Sincerely, Kristine Kim, Supervising REHS Department of Environmental Health 12/21/2020 DRC ENGINEERING, INC. 160 S. Old Springs Rd. # 210 Anaheim, CA 92808 '4W` EASTERN WATER MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT Subject: SAN 53 — WS 20200001179 Will Serve — APNS: 944-370-001, 005 thru 008, 010, 012 and 013 (PM 31023) Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) is willing to provide sewer services to the subject project. The provisions of service are contingent upon the developer completing the necessary arrangements in accordance with EMWD rules and regulations. EMWD expects the developer to coordinate with the approving agency for the proper notification. Further arrangements for service from EMWD may also include plan check, facility construction, inspection, jurisdictional annexation, and payment of financial participation charges. The developer is advised to contact EMWD's Development Services Department early in the entitlement process to determine the necessary arrangements for service, and to receive direction on the preparation of facility Design Conditions, which is required prior to final engineering. EMWD's ability to serve is subject to limiting conditions, such as regulatory requirements, legal issues, or conditions beyond EMWD's control. Expiration — one year from date of issue Thank you for your cooperation in serving our mutual customers. If you have any questions, please call me at (951) 928-3777, extension 4467. Sincerely, 6, a' ' Brian A. Raines, MPA, PE Associate Civil Engineer 11 Development Services Department Eastern Municipal Water District BAR/bd Board of directors David J. Slawson. President Ronald W. Sullivan, Vice Presider; Stephen J Corona Philip E. Pau4e Ran8y A Record 2270 Trumble Road - P.O. Box 8300 - Perris, CA 92572-8300 T 951.928.3777 0 F 951.928.6177 www.emwd.org o § | . ! $ § § £ c 0 k $ tm ) \ \ 6 ! J \ ! kCD ■ I c \## k a J t 2 — k ƒ 2 K ) 2■] ) to ■ a 8 A 2 2$) j $/ k k : ; i i i k to k\\$\\\ � 0 i | i �■ ® � 70 � � � ■ � � c4Ak-).§ 22 kkk2) [ §■o 77//k a T5 232 2 , PL % §Eg �§§g£ CD ���■I �■. / �� ®�2 EtU1] )am 28(( f �k@ 2§ ® c$e \r, ns.2 k2§ƒ � $ § w g § k LU § co G § � � o � December 22, 2020 Case Planner Rancho County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health water Post Office Box 7909 Riverside, CA 92513-7909 SUBJECT: WATER AVAILABILITY Board of Directors PARCEL NOS. 1 THROUGH 8 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 31023 APNS 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, Bill Wilson President 944-370-008, 944-370-010, AND 944-370-012 Carol Lee Gonzales -Brady [RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY, LP] Senior Vice President Dear Case Planner: Brian Brady Angel Garcia Please be advised that the above -referenced project/property is located within John E. Hoagland the Service boundaries of Rancho California Water District (Rancho Water/District). The subject project/property fronts an existing 12-inch diameter William E. Plummer water pipeline (1380 Pressure Zone) within Rancho California Road. Please refer John V. Rossi to the enclosed exhibit map. Officers Water service to the subject project/property exists under Account No. 3095910, Eva PlantGeneral Manager P.E. Assistant G Location No. 2046417 and Account No. 3095911, Location No. 2046418 (Fire Engineering and Operations Service exists under Account No. 3095793, Location No. 2046412 and Account No. Richard R. Aragon, CPFO 3095794, Location No. 2046413 and Landscape Service exists under Account No. Assistant General Manager 3095897, Location No. 2046416 and Account No. 3099303, Location No. CFO/Treasurer 2046511). Additions or modifications to water service arrangements are subject Jason A. Martin Director of Administration to the Rules and Regulations (governing) Water System Facilities and Service, as well as the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the Eileen Dienzo Director of Human Resources property owner. Kell! E. Garcia District Secretary Water service to individual lots will require the extension of water facilities within Distr James B. Gilpin dedicated public and/or private right-of-ways. Individual water meters will be Best Best & Krieger LLP required for each lot and/or project unit, including separate water General Counsel services/meters for domestic service, fire service, and landscape irrigation service, as applicable. Beginning in 2018, newly constructed multi -unit residential structures are required to measure the quantity of water supplied to each individual residential dwelling unit. Where private on -site water facilities (for water service, fire service, irrigation, or other purpose) will cross or will be shared amongst multiple lots/project units (only by special variance of the Rules and Regulations), and/or where such 'common' facilities will be owned and maintained by a Property Owners' Association, Rancho Water requires execution and recordation of a Reciprocal Easement and Maintenance Agreement or equivalent document of covenants, codes, and restrictions. 20\KC:hab064\F450\FEG a ncho California Water 42135 Winchester Road - Post Office Box 9017 - Temecula, California 92589-9017 - (951) 296-6900 - FAX (951) 296-6860 - www.ranchowater.com Case Planner/County of Riverside December 22, 2020 Page Two Water availability is contingent upon the property owner(s) destroying all on -site wells and signing an Agency Agreement that assigns water management rights, if any, to Rancho Water. In addition, water availability is subject to water supply shortage contingency measures in effect (pursuant to Rancho Water's Water Shortage Contingency Plan or other applicable ordinances and policy), and/or the adoption of a required Water Supply Assessment for the development, as determined by the Lead Agency. There is no recycled water currently available within the limits established by Resolution 2007- 10-5. Should recycled water become available in the future, the project/property may be required to retrofit its facilities to make use of this availability in accordance with Resolution 2007-10-5. Recycled water service, therefore, would be available upon construction of any required on -site and/or off -site recycled water facilities and the completion of financial arrangements between Rancho Water and the property owner. Requirements for the use of recycled water are available from Rancho Water. As soon as feasible, and prior to the preparation of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) documents, the project proponent should contact Rancho Water for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project -specific demands and/or fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. If new facilities are required for service, fire protection, or other purposes, the project proponent should contact Rancho Water for an assessment of project -specific fees and requirements. Sewer service to the subject project/property, if available, would be provided by Eastern Municipal Water District. If no sewer service is currently available to the subject project/property, all proposed waste discharge systems must comply with the State Water Resources Control Board, health department, and/or other requirements as they relate to the protection of groundwater quality, pursuant to Rancho Water's Groundwater Protection Policy. If you should have any questions or need additional information, please contact an Engineering Technician at the District office at (951) 296-6900. Sincerely, RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT Krisma Crowell Engineering Technician Enclosure: Exhibit Map cc: Jeff Kirshberg, Water Resources Manager Corry Smith, Engineering Services Supervisor 20\KC:hab064\F450\FEG Rancho California Water District 42135 Winchester Road • Post Office Box 9017 • Temecula, California 92589-9017 • (951) 296-6900 • FAX (951) 296-6860 • www ranchowater com A ar.. I M, if �r� 1 1 .. _..a'FO. i�'�iC� NZ I, 4 Leighton Consulting, Inc. A LEIGHTON GROUP COMPANY February 4, 2021 Project No. 11760.020 City of Temecula, Planning Department 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Attention: Mr. Scott Cooper, Associate Planner Subject: Geotechnical Peer Review #3 Proposed Temecula Village Apartments — Phase 2 (PA20-1325) Rancho California Road, Temecula, California Reference: EEI, Response to Geotechnical Peer Review, Proposed Temecula Village Apartments — Phase 2 (PA20-1325), Rancho California Road, Temecula, California, Project No 11760.020, dated January 21, 2021, EEI Project PWD-72988.4b, In accordance with your request, we reviewed the above referenced report by EER in response to our Peer Review Comments #2 dated January 21, 2021. It is our opinion that EEI has substantially addressed our comments. Although not explicitly stated in the above response, we expect EEI to further verify the potential for expansive soils on this site and make the structural engineer aware of such condition so any slab -on -grade foundations are designed accordingly and comply with requirements of 2019 Building Code. Otherwise, no further action is required from our peer review viewpoint with the regard to the submitted report. We appreciate this opportunity to be of service to City and please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any question. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON CONSULTING, INC. Alp c `c��ONAL �Nc� 0 �iT F, �� r �� \SON i S,q�i 2� o . + $�W1421 VT CERTIFIED 2641 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST Robert F. Riha, CEG 1921 Simon I. Saiid, PE, GE 2641 Senior Principal Geologist Principal Engineer �FoF CAL�FO� Distribution: (1) Addressee (PDF copy via email) 41715 Enterprise Circle N., Suite 103 ■ Temecula, CA 92590-5661 951.296.0530 ■ Fax 951.296.0534 RESOLUTION NO.2022- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to, a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff's direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-19 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)." F. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearings and due consideration of the proposed Project, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-23 "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPRXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944- 370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1326)". G. On August 23, 2022 the City Council of the City of Temecula considered the Project and the Final ND for the Project, at a duly noticed public hearing at which time all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to this matter. The Council considered all the testimony and any comments received regarding the Project and the Final ND prior to and at the public hearing. H. Following the public hearing, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2022- "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)". Resolution No. 2022- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. I. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. The City Council in approving the Tentative Parcel Map hereby makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 38043 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Municipal Code, and the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the Development Code, General Plan, and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The proposed Tentative Tract Map combines eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel for residential development. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) (SCH# 2021050549) was prepared. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and fire codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on developed and vacant property and does not propose any grading or construction. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision design and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City s parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project prior to the recordation of a Final Tentative Map. Section 3. Conditions of Approval. Thi approves Planning Application No. PA20-1326, existing contiguous parcels into a single parce approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. (A: 013), subject to the Conditions of Approval incorporated herein by this reference. City Council of the City of Temecula hereby Tentative Tract Map 38043 to combine eight (8) on the south side of Rancho California Road, 'Ns: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, set forth on Exhibit A, attached hereto, and Section 4. Effective Date. This Resolution shall take effect upon the effective date of Ordinance No. "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)." Section 5. Notice of Adoption. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 23rd day of August, 2022. Matt Rahn, Mayor ATTEST: Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022- was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 23rd day of August, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSTAIN: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Randi Johl, City Clerk EXHIBIT A CITY OF TEMECULA DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Planning Application No.: PA20-1326 Project Description: ATentative Tract Map to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel under TTM 38043 Assessor's Parcel No.: 944-370-001 944-370-005 944-370-006 944-370-007 944-370-008 944-370-010 944-370-012 944-370-013 MSHCP Category: Residential (Greater Than 14.1 du/ac) DIF Category: Residential -Attached TUMF Category: Residential -Multi -Family Quimby Category: Multi -Family Attached (5 or More Units) New Street In -lieu of Fee: N/A (Project not located in Uptown Temecula Specific Plan area) Approval Date: August 23, 2022 Expiration Date: August 23, 2025 PLANNING DIVISION General Requirements Page 1 of 6 Indemnification of the City. Indemnity, Duty to Defend and Obligation to Pay Judgments and Defense Costs, Including Attorneys' Fees, Incurred by the City. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its elected officials, officers, employees, volunteers, agents, and those City agents serving as independent contractors in the role of City officials (collectively "Indemnitees") from and against any claims, damages, actions, causes of actions, lawsuits, suits, proceedings, losses, judgments, costs, and expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys' fees or court costs) in any manner arising out of or incident to the Planning Commission's actions, this approval and the City Council's actions, related entitlements, or the City's environmental review thereof. The Applicant shall pay and satisfy any judgment, award or decree that may be rendered against City or the other Indemnitees in any such suit, action, or other legal proceeding. The City shall promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and the City shall reasonably cooperate in the defense. If the City fails to promptly notify the Applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding, or if the City fails to reasonably cooperate in the defense, the Applicant shall not thereafter be responsible to defend, indemnify, or hold harmless the City or the Indemnitees. The City shall have the right to select counsel of its choice. The Applicant shall reimburse the City, and the other Indemnitees, for any and all legal expenses and costs incurred by each of them in connection therewith or in enforcing the indemnity herein provided. Nothing in this condition shall be construed to require the Applicant to indemnify Indemnitees for any claim arising from the sole negligence or willful misconduct of the Indemnitees. In the event such a legal action is filed challenging the City's determinations herein or the issuance of the approval, the City shall estimate its expenses for the litigation. The Applicant shall deposit said amount with the City or, at the discretion of the City, enter into an agreement with the City to pay such expenses as they become due. 2. Expiration. This approval shall be used within three years of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and void. Use means the beginning of substantial construction contemplated by this approval within the three year period, which is thereafter diligently pursued to completion, or the beginning of substantial utilization contemplated by this approval, or use of a property in conformance with a Conditional Use Permit. A modification made to an approved Tentative Map does not affect the original approval date of a development plan. Time Extension. The Director of Community Development may, upon an application being filed prior to expiration, and for good cause, grant a time extension of up to five (5) extensions of time, one year at a time. A modification made to an approved development plan does not affect the original approval date of a development plan 4. Consistency with Planned Development Overlay. This project and all subsequent projects within this site shall be consistent with Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) Modifications or Revisions. The developer shall obtain City approval for any modifications or revisions to the approval of this project. Prior to Release of Power, Building Occupancy or Any Use Allowed by This Permit 6. TCSD Service Levels. It shall be the developer's responsibility to provide written disclosure of the existence of the Temecula Community Service District (TCSD) and its service level rates and charges to all prospective purchasers. Page 2 of 6 7. Compliance with Conditions of Approval. All of the foregoing conditions shall be complied with prior to occupancy or any use allowed by this approval. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 8. Final Map. A copy of the Final Map shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division. 9. Environmental Constraint Sheet. A copy of the Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS) shall be submitted to, and approved by, the Planning Division with the following notes: a. This property is located within 30 miles of Mount Palomar Observatory. All proposed outdoor lighting systems shall comply with the California Institute of Technology, Palomar Observatory recommendations, Ordinance No. 655. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT General Requirements 10. Subdivision Map. The developer shall submit a complete Tract Map submittal for review and approval. Any omission to the representation of the site conditions may require the plans to be resubmitted for further review and revision. 11. Grading Permit. A grading permit for rough and/or precise grading shall be obtained from Public Works prior to commencement of any construction within private property. Grading shall be in accordance with the approved grading plan, grading permit conditions and City codes/standards. 12. Encroachment Permits. Prior to commencement of any applicable construction, encroachment permit(s) are required and shall be obtained from Public Works for public offsite improvements. 13. Private Drainage Facilities. All onsite drainage and water quality facilities shall be privately maintained. 14. Parkway Landscaping. All parkway landscaping areas shall be privately maintained. Prior to Recordation of the Final Map 15. Conditions of Approval. The developer shall comply with all Conditions of Approval, the Engineering and Construction Manual and all City codes/standards at no cost to any governmental agency. 16. Plans, Agreements & Securities. The developer shall have executed subdivision monumentation agreement and posted securities. 17. Right -of -Way Dedications. All easements and/or right-of-way dedications shall be offered for dedication to the public or other appropriate agency and shall continue in force until the City accepts or abandons such offers. All dedications shall be free from all encumbrances as approved by Public Works. 18. Environmental Constraint Sheet (ECS). The developer shall prepare and record an ECS with the Tract Map to delineate identified environmental concerns. The developer shall comply with all constraints per the recorded ECS along with any underlying maps related to the property. Page 3 of 6 19. Required Clearances. As deemed necessary by Public Works, the developer shall receive written clearance from the following agencies: a. Rancho California Water District; b. Southern California Edison Company or other affected agencies 20. Right of Access. Relinquish and waive right of access to and from Rancho California Road on the Tract Map with the exception of one opening as delineated on the approved Tentative Tract Map. 21. Easements. Note the following: a. An easement shall be dedicated for public utilities and emergency vehicle access for all private streets and drives. b. Easements (when required for roadway slopes, landscape, drainage facilities, utilities, etc.) shall be shown on the Tract Map if they are located within the land division boundary. All offers of dedication and conveyances shall be submitted for review and recorded, as directed by Public Works. Onsite drainage facilities located outside of road right-of-way shall be contained within drainage easements and shown on the Tract Map. A note shall be added to the Tract Map stating: "Drainage easements shall be kept free of buildings and obstructions." 22. Property Taxes. Any delinquent property taxes shall be paid. Prior to Issuance of a Grading Permit 23. Grading/Erosion & Sediment Control Plan. The developer shall submit a grading/erosion & sediment control plan(s) to be reviewed and approved by Public Works. All plans shall be coordinated for consistency with adjacent projects and existing improvements contiguous to the site. The approved plan shall include all final WQMP water quality facilities and all construction -phase pollution -prevention controls to adequately address non -permitted runoff. Refer to the City's Engineering & Construction Manual at: www.TemeculaCA.gov/ECM 24. Erosion & Sediment Control Securities. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 18, Section 18.24.140 of the Temecula Municipal Code by posting security and entering into an agreement to guarantee the erosion & sediment control improvements. 25. NPDES General Permit Compliance. The developer shall obtain project coverage under the State National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Construction Activities and shall provide the following: a. A copy of the Waste Discharge Identification number (WDID) issued by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB); b. The project's Risk Level (RL) determination number; and c. The name, contact information and certification number of the Qualified SWPPP Developer (QSD). Pursuant to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) requirements and City's storm water ordinance, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be generated and submitted to the Board. Throughout the project duration, the SWPPP shall be routinely updated and readily available (onsite) to the State and City. Review www.cabmphandbooks.com for SWPPP guidelines. Refer to the following link: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water issues/programs/stormwater/construction.shtml Page 4 of 6 26. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and O&M Agreement.. The developer shall submit a final WQMP (prepared by a registered professional engineer) with the initial grading plan submittal, based on the conceptual WQMP from the entitlement process. It must receive acceptance by Public Works. A copy of the final project -specific WQMP must be kept onsite at all times. In addition, a completed WQMP Operation and Maintenance (O&M) Agreement shall be submitted for review and approval. Upon approval from City staff, the applicant shall record the O&M agreement at the County Recorder's Office in Temecula. Refer to the WQMP template and agreement link: www.TemeculaCA.gov/WQMP. As part of the WQMP approval, the Engineer of Record shall report and certify BMP construction per City of Temecula NPDES requirements. Should the project require Alternative Compliance, the developer is responsible for execution of an approved Alternative Compliance Agreement. 27. Area Drainage Plan (ADP) Fee to RCFC&WCD. The developer shall demonstrate to the City that the flood mitigation charge (ADP fee) has been paid to RCFC&WCD. If the full ADP fee has already been credited to this property, no new charge will be required. 28. Drainage Study. A drainage study shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer and submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan check in accordance with City, Riverside County and engineering standards. The study shall identify storm water runoff quantities (to mitigate the 10 and 100-year storm event for 24 hour storm duration peak flow) from the development of this site and upstream of the site. It shall identify all existing or proposed offsite or onsite, public or private, drainage facilities intended to discharge this runoff. Runoff shall be conveyed to an adequate outfall capable of receiving the storm water runoff without damage to public or private property. The study shall include a capacity analysis verifying the adequacy of all facilities. Any upgrading or upsizing of drainage facilities necessary to convey the storm water runoff shall be provided as part of development of this project. 29. RCFC&WCD Encroachment Permit. A copy of the grading and improvement plans, along with supporting hydrologic and hydraulic calculations, shall be submitted to the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for approval. 30. Soils Report. A soils report, prepared by a registered soil or civil engineer, shall be submitted to Public Works with the initial grading plan submittal. The report shall address the site's soil conditions and provide recommendations for the construction of engineered structures and preliminary pavement sections. 31. Geological Report. The developer shall comply with the recommendations and/or proposed Conditions of Approval as identified during entitlement. 32. Letter of Permission/Easement. The developer shall obtain documents (letters of permission or easements) for any offsite work performed on adjoining properties. The document's format is as directed by, and shall be submitted to, Public Works for acceptance. The document information shall be noted on the approved grading plan. 33. Habitat Conservation Fee. The developer shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 8.24 of the Temecula Municipal Code (Habitat Conservation) by paying the appropriate fee set forth in the ordinance or by providing documented evidence that the fees have already been paid. 34. American Disability Act. The developer shall ensure that all frontage areas to the proposed development within the public right of way are ADA compliant. Any sidewalk within the public right of way found to be non -compliant shall be the responsibility of the property owner to be removed and replaced with ADA compliant sidewalk per the Streets and Highway Code Section 5610. Page 5 of 6 Prior to Issuance of Encroachment Permit(s) 35. Public Utility Agency Work. The developer shall submit all relevant documentation due to encroaching within City right-of-way; and is responsible for any associated costs and for making arrangements with each applicable public utility agency. 36. Traffic Control Plans. A construction area traffic control plan (TCP) will be required for lane closures and detours or other disruptions to traffic circulation; and shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. The TCP shall be designed by a registered civil or traffic engineer in conformance with the latest edition of the Caltrans Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and City standards. 37. Improvement Plans. All improvement plans (including but not limited to street, storm drain, traffic) shall be reviewed and approved by Public Works. 38. Street Trenching. All street trenches shall conform to City Standard No. 407; refer to the City's Paving Notes. Prior to Issuance of Building Permit(s) 39. Final Map. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, Tract Map Number 38043 shall be approved and recorded. 40. Precise Grading Plan. The building pad(s) shall be certified by a registered civil engineer for location and elevation; and the soils engineer shall issue a final soils report addressing compaction and site conditions. Prior to Issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy 41. Completion of Improvements. The developer shall complete all work per the approved plans and Conditions of Approval to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. This includes all on site work (including water quality facilities), public improvements and the executed WQMP Operation and Maintenance agreement. 42. Utility Agency Clearances. The developer shall receive written clearance from applicable utility agencies (i.e., Rancho California and Eastern Municipal Water Districts, etc.) for the completion of their respective facilities and provide to Public Works. 43. Replacement of Damaged Improvements/Monuments. Any appurtenance damaged or broken during development shall be repaired or removed and replaced to the satisfaction of Public Works. Any survey monuments damaged or destroyed shall be reset per City Standards by a qualified professional pursuant to the California Business and Professional Code Section 8771. 44. Certifications. All necessary certifications and clearances from engineers, utility companies and public agencies shall be submitted as required by Public Works. Page 6 of 6 PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-19 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed, including but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). D. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project. E. The City contracted with Ascent Environmental Inc. for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Ascent Environmental Inc. and City staff concluded the project could not have a significant impact on the environment. Based upon this determination, Ascent Environmental Inc. prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Negative Declaration ("Draft ND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. F. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft ND, along with the Draft ND and its Appendices, to the public and other interested parties for a 30-day comment period from May 27, 2021 through June 27, 2021. The City published a Notice of Intent to Adopt for the Draft ND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents were made available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 and on the City of Temecula website. G. During the comment period, the City received two (2) written comments on the Draft ND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. H. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final ND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter. Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final ND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that: A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. B. That the Initial Study/ND has been prepared and circulated in compliance with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the procedures set forth in the ordinances of the City. C. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft ND, the Final ND, and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. D. The Planning Commission has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final ND, the written and oral comments on the Draft ND, the Draft ND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony. E. The Planning Commission has reviewed the Final ND and all comments received regarding the Final ND prior to and at the July 20, 2022 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final ND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final ND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Final ND attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. ary Watts, Chairperson ATT T: Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-19 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio Luke Watson Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-20 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 0079 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff's direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)". Resolution No. 2022- _ is hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of the General Plan Amendment Application No. PA20-1323, consistent with Government Code section 65358, hereby finds, determines and declares that: A. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest. The current General Plan designation for the project site is a Professional Office (PO) land use as specified in the City of Temecula General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is in the public interest because it allows for high -quality residential development in an area surrounded by residential development that would help to fulfill the City's regional housing needs, including the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) requirement. This General Plan amendment allows for residential use where it otherwise would not be permitted Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a Resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED `A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION TO REVISE THE GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE PARCELS OF THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT FROM PROFESSIONAL OFFICE TO A MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1323)"' in the substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. 4 Gary Watts, Chairman a �47 e tson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-20 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Telesio �r Luke Watson Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-21 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ENTITLED "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1324)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay was approved by the City Council on October 22, 2002 by the adoption of Resolution No. 02-05. The Temecula Village Planned Development Overlay as approved shall be referred to in this Resolution as the "PDO". B. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. C. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. D. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. E. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff s direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. F. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission, G. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022- "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPT THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-134)." Resolution No. 2022- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. H. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Provisions for Fiscal Impact Payments A. The City and owner estimate that the increased costs to the City of providing public safety and other municipal services to the area resulting from the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the Project will substantially exceed the municipal revenue from the Project ("City Services Deficit"). The City has received a Fiscal Impact Analysis, dated as of June, 2022 ("FIA"), documenting the City Services Deficit. The owners of the property within the Project, and their successors in interest, shall pay the City the sum of sum of Forty Four Dollars ($44.00) per Occupied Residential Property each year as mitigation for the City Services Deficit, with an increase in such payment each fiscal year in an amount of seventeen point forty four percent (17.44%) of the previous year's payment, as such increase may be adjusted as part of the yearly assessment or special tax levy as provided in a funding mechanism that may be approved by the City. "Occupied Residential Property" means an assessor's parcel in the Planned Development Overlay area for which building permits for residential construction have been issued, and a certificate of occupancy or final inspection has been issued, or as may be further defined in the City approved funding mechanism. Owner and its successors to the property within the Project may fulfill this obligation through a community facilities district established by the City pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities District Act of 1982, Government Code Section 53311, et seq., or other appropriated financing mechanism approved by the City; provided, however, the obligation of each owner and their successors to pay the City Services Deficit payment under this obligation remains an obligation of the owner and its successors regardless of the financing mechanism used to pay it and regardless of whether there is a financing mechanism to pay it. Five years after the date of the first certificate of occupancy or final inspection is issued for a home in the Project and every five years after that, the owners of the properties may request that the City re-evaluate the yearly payments for the City Services Deficit and prepare an updated FIA to analyze the continuing impacts of the Project to the City's budget. The cost of the updated FIA shall be paid for by the owners of the properties within the Project. Section 3. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval the Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Application No. PA20-1324, hereby finds, determines and declares that: Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Planning Application No. PA20-1324 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed Ordinance is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance conforms to the City of Temecula General Plan Land Use Element. Furthermore, the proposed Zone Change/Planned Development Overlay Amendment Ordinance directly responds to Goal I Policy LU-1.1 and LU-1.2 of the General Plan Land Use Element. The proposed project is also consistent with the above General Plan Land Use Element goal and policy in that it is contributing to the development of housing that is suitable for the community's labor force in the form of an apartment community and has been designed to minimize impacts on surrounding land uses and infrastructure through required and proposed design guidelines and development standards, building orientation and location, circulation and access, and other features and requirements of the proposed Planned Development Overlay Amendment. Additionally, mitigation measures were not required as part of the Negative Declaration as the potential for impacts to surrounding uses and infrastructure were determined not to be significant. Section 4. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt an Ordinance entitled "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY AMENDMENT TO THE TEMECULA VILLAGE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FT WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE. (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1324)" in substantially the same form attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 5. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 201h day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman A Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-21 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: None ABSTAIN: I PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Telesio Luke Watson Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-22 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. Collectively, the Project consists of a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the Project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. C. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. D. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff's direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. E. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. F. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 22-22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)." G. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Development Plan application PA20-1325, pursuant to Temecula Municipal Code section 17.05.010 hereby finds, determines and declares that Development Plan application No. PA20- 1325 is consistent with the General Plan for the City of Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City: A. The proposed use is in conformance with the General Plan for Temecula and with all applicable requirements of State law and other Ordinances of the City; The proposed project consists of the construction of a multifamily residential community. With the approval of the General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment the project site will allow for a multifamily residential community. Therefore, the project is consistent with the General Plan for Temecula and the Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment. The project, as conditioned, is also consistent with other applicable requirements of State law and local Ordinances, including the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the Citywide Design Guidelines, and Fire and Building codes. B. The overall development of the land is designed for the protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; The overall design of the project, including the site, building, parking, circulation and other associated site improvements, is consistent with, and intended to protect the health and safety of those working and living in an around the site as the Project is consistent with the General Plan, City Wide Design Guidelines, Proposed Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay Amendment, and Development Code. The Project has been reviewed for, and as conditioned, has been found to be consistent with all applicable policies, guidelines, standards and regulations intended to ensure that the development will be constructed and function in a manner consistent with the public health, safety, and welfare. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE" (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)" in substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. /Ky'Watts, Chairman ATTES Lu e atson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-22 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 20th day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Hagel, Ruiz, Turley-Trejo, Watts None None Teles' �k Luke Watson Secretary PC RESOLUTION NO.2022-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1326)" Section 1. Procedural Findings. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to a public notice, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act. C. A Negative Declaration (ND) was prepared for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines ("CEQA"). The Draft ND was prepared under staff's direction by Environmental Science Associates (ESA). Thereafter, City staff filed a Notice of Completion with the State Clearinghouse, and circulated a Notice of Intent with the Draft ND and Appendices to the public and other interested parties, for a 30-day public review and comment period for the Draft ND commenced on May 27, 2021 and concluded on June 27, 2021. Signs were placed on the property and a notice was placed in the local paper. The City of Temecula received two (2) written comments and responded to each comment in the Final ND, which includes all timely received written comments and responses thereto. Comments were received by the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and Temecula Valley Unified School District. The Final ND was provided to commenting agencies in compliance with State Law. The "Final ND" consists of the Draft ND and all of its appendices and the comments and responses to comments on the Draft ND. The Final ND was made available to the public and to all commenting agencies in accordance with the law. D. On July 20, 2022 the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula held a duly noticed public hearing on the proposed Negative Declaration and proposed Project at which time all persons interested in these actions had the opportunity and did address the Planning Commission. E. Following consideration of the entire record of information received at the public hearing, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)." Resolution No. 2022- and the findings therein are hereby incorporated by this reference as set forth in full. F. All legal preconditions to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. Section 2. Further Findings. The Planning Commission, in recommending approval of Tentative Tract Map application PA22-1326, makes the following findings as required by Temecula Municipal Code Section 16.09.140: A. The proposed subdivision and the design and improvements of the subdivision are consistent with the Development Code, General Plan, any applicable Specific Plan and the City of Temecula Municipal Code. Tentative Tract Map No. 38043 has been designed in a manner that is consistent with and meets all development and design standards of the General Plan, the Subdivision Ordinance, the Municipal Code, and the Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. B. The Tentative Map does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965, or the land is subject to a Land Conservation Act contract but the resulting parcels following division of the land will not be too small to sustain their agricultural use. The subject parcel does not propose to divide land which is subject to a contract entered into pursuant to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. The subject property has not been designated for conservation or agricultural land and is not subject to the California Land Conservation Act of 1965. C. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of development proposed by the Tentative Map. The proposed Tentative Map is in accordance with what is allowed by the Development Code, General Plan, and Rendezvous Planned Development Overlay. The proposed Tentative Tract Map combines eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel for residential development. As such, the site is suitable for this development proposed. D. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements, with Conditions of Approval are not likely to cause significant environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The project has been reviewed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based on an Initial Study, it has been determined the project could not have a significant impact on the environment; therefore, a Draft Negative Declaration (ND) (SCH# 2021050549) was prepared. E. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems because the proposed development is consistent with all applicable building, development and fire codes, which include provisions to safeguard public health, and will be further reviewed and inspected by City staff for compliance with all applicable building, development and f re codes prior to issuance of any grading, building, or occupancy permits. F. The design of the subdivision provides for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities in the subdivision to the extent feasible. The project consists of a Tentative Tract Map on developed and vacant property and does not propose any grading or construction. Any future development on the project site will be in accordance with the requirements of the California Building Code in effect at that time as it relates to heating and cooling. G. The design of the subdivision and the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, or the design of the alternate easements which are substantially equivalent to those previously acquired by the public will be provided. The subdivision design and the improvements being proposed including the residential lots will not conflict with existing or future easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The project is being conditioned to grant all required easements and dedications. H. The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act). The subdivision is consistent with the City's parkland dedication requirements (Quimby Act) because payment of Quimby fees has been included as a condition of approval of the project prior to the recordation of a Final Tentative Map. Section 3. Recommendation. The Planning Commission of the City of Temecula recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution entitled "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 TO COMBINE EIGHT (8) EXISTING CONTIGUOUS PARCELS INTO A SINGLE PARCEL ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 008, 010, 012, 013) (PA20- 1326)" in substantially the same form attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "A", and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 4. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the City of Temecula Planning Commission this 20th day of July, 2022. Gary Watts, Chairman a Luke Watson Secretary [SEAL] STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE )ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Luke Watson, Secretary of the Temecula Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the forgoing PC Resolution No. 2022-23 was duly and regularly adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Temecula at a regular meeting thereof held on the 201h day of July, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 4 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Hagel, Ruiz, Turley-Trejo, Watts NOES: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSENT: 0 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS None ABSTAIN: 1 PLANNING COMMISSIONERS Telesio 2 /' tk Luke Watson Secretary OWNER/APPLICANT LANDSCIPE ARCNITCCi - V ♦Ssta.3rt�vG leM1°�ainiiNA � lwsl)wa° uss°cart mu ARCHITECT M ERGItlEE6 n a 'a SOIL ENGINEER �D� Mf ssTR uasxa. n" cR m.u« « nIM I - 1 TOPOGRAPHY J ' xo n[verlws vRow[ rl lr }f 61dg 1I PARCEL 0 as I -p II I` T - _""R""RK , PROJECT DESCRIPTIDN fTs II u \° •, z r fYld A iw°sxPs°wnxoncwim[is us� �� I i� uncov nIF U. vJ V ryxw;o[ol. YK OfY ao ugh i� 2 I I I - e C3 II p PARCEL Bldg 12 neon w:avc°uli`v cawxD.an xxefx I I I «rox:rzm, fxnR.amsl za z°°a I I I II I I SiR[ET ADDRESSES I ^•� �-•^ E%ISTING+ZONING DESIGNATIDN \ r / '� rf« °�[wnv°ual wiw3r lP o-sl E%ISTING DESIGNAMN jp)x[Pxa[sswWtliN 1>-i] a%%arc) GENERAL ) FNIeTIN � AND IS �r� "' •^ r xuxl/tame / ' IM� r PRDPOSED IAND DSE � � r �II ry) HDIn axm IUL 0-ID Site Plan Information Cross Rcicrcncc Al- In°I�� z.arM1.nl nN rer,c.,.• r Ma<5r:c;\�m nlr ka<am %,.rn,\rnn, PII.I >. aml.y.JaWiaax all Jin<nwmxl.w. nM all -I �cr+l.11. of all r•nxrV aM r�A'<+nl.-.a+nm. Al: r.rJr6r Mlwua ufLl <r,w ,N nJ lrwxxrJ a,;w ul<t .I�J•yr WJJrv¢.rrbnu L I I.Snxn+[JJlllxrxwa of.Jl larvlrv<c¢.M I,Jrrrxxr .r Jl..).uMkrll nl. I. +rJ yl•�Vl Jnx..xn or Jrn.+IJe. IraJ i nxnl Lxa�nn of•r\I�Ilntwa rl Wr.n.J wru. feel IwM1•'n Al..ANI n..J J�rm+wn ol¢Il ri.rM1.riclow<.Illanlw and ll.:il-J r<y Jl ulrllx<r r^Iprl.l<.i.,n°+nl rv•A+•�ll tk�rrA Nau. A ).11 col rxymx nrla-.rnl orl nwlerry. P.n umrir:e TrrUllrvlr.ex dxvl \I -I a 1 r>nV•IHIn f.+Wlrri u.r .r lns.ra f..e.rn.r� ICI ..a .111.IIPUIe¢.r let nl malJ I nJur n4nax °I�I.�fry «Ixl¢.11,Y •cl;xk ur.Wx I.f Un+rU Jlnnxiwr of xil xx:L eM frn'ea 1Tl.l l.� .x Nlw r. yl•. rvlAl•I¢ x+ry I na xUNw.W Inl of Urr n• mxr a(,M r\x.1,.N11:1 ¢ Ncunrn¢NnJ u.ca Mln<II PIn<I• Pvl lrflxW^r..Jl \1�1•I �x.dNIF\MII.\IIAI+cxxurMcrwl<.0 vnrJll of xuf • CITY OF TEMECULA PROPOSED SITE PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD h mxssrN% DATA TABLE aN .,o °e R �w°m69++.3]oa°rrnan.»om¢L 9an.3foolr.9w.er°a». v, x`,�..'xW i. lic+�e .f r Lva . ,.nnwrorvmmanJ, •xlrlx i«�'a��nr uNIM1IPm3s n.] J Fkyr.uP•r.xlurrxr t�;a w'iMaW wr.•:lreu]m nu, fu i>�ut�) <• r4a.3rn 11a9>9 <I L Ine lTlu•PI xtl)<wT 121 sl»I1W lamealeslrssl�xa •wx nelrnunnrao.) rylr lN.•Pr.ry.a) J��a u�wti�:.ra ac.r u<.aunw�rN. u 1. n•ITN•PrvPwal ar - ] a�xm TPP< s¢rwlwu.wr M1}.rrmxnr<. »eta Tyr.3R 11 x<nx<Pronl TSx IA SA Yu 1 AIti ��<r IPM+u<J rx SI-I Ir.alun nl xll e•wr^R uJ prurc....INrtcr l.rglwlnxlr.�r u> N 3A 3A Did g 13 II - T wM1 i Ell 15 CAI ^ Bldg waPARCFI z� 14 al.\xnit 1 3 r ------ a w y rP �ND� ��—_ I � SHEET ixal�xR°rfoic�[PxRlm sn=z SYMBOL LEGCND: V --------- -..°..,Ix IIt3 �3 ,�i —__—ProP[RI�Jx[nPlnxs vavxxc s,ul cwxl ( � � I I ABBREVIATIONS of [ Hxai s,xu • xlnR[f marl I ( Ex I 'F o-«[mxl mx� n Plx wax a J� rtt13 PMx (I I , MIR: nTl><'tlEi% [awl WMaa nR as H w¢..n waa ire vn"aM N a m , [ H rxnR lalrz"nu u3 zr �POxI (fill ]ff-two III[[ Mx GM BUlmlGi�a « Wa IMI i l°�i�c sMA� x robs l[Hs)I,s Innnl �W rtN� Dul nri. yl m»a]r Dv Mai„ erun•!wr«+f oNwxPN4 [Hf [aDx[N+. ° u[tIRG (w)> n s [qsM psR Ha-wl (wlax-f«r EASEMENTS AND DEDICATION NOTES O ° nRx°xa vm xsvwlxl x0. •«», a[mm¢ xvsa H. O x �xKr Hrla[a vu¢�°r�IWAxvut¢s�4axs 0/a-H © [0r�x1%' visa¢ Aw .�snuvi�i r n+ac � Ptl13, v �:xH`x°a� uro 0 R[Rctps, vm vuml xV i,ma Pua[[s\ni-4 vs'e tu/Rel ,� RANCHOCALIFORNIAROAO RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAO ` II � R O 0 © ��Lxwv lRia � I EXISTING• SITE IHOR LEGEND ro no. L— NO. nw L——.11—�xsir wRxG NO" pc. LOO-C xuMRLr MN sNmREST cwxu L-- Prwro n,� Laowc w[sYAr uwc xaRm Rnr Moro n+: Lowwo �s nr�rxu w-srz xuR Mo,o n>: Lowwc usrRLr rRN swmw:sr cwxu NOW pv: L=. 1-1 uwc scum NOW p LOORwo sNMRLv FRN s0umus, CONER I• vxo,0 pLowac swNM'n w-vrt x[AR q�FRN ,o P. Laowrw m R/R NOW nA LOOxwO [ASYRLr FRN IOR—ST OONER .R Pxmo no. LYonw rxa -a,E xEAR p II TO As: Lowwc —1.11— sNmREsr cwxu NOW pi: Lm«yxc � m�r uwc swm NOW s LOwwc swmmr ALoxc rxwm RAW .xoro n•: Lowwc swMA. uN xamREs, aMu MRro m LR�wR RAN w-R E K R .xoro IRs: Lower � sr�Rlr uwo mum NOW pa LOOK.x-a-xwx we mum I ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER IAPN): ro ns: Laanw scums. rRw xwmResr cwxu wrwo ,:,: LRww x r FRN mRMLERr �w M0,0 RI. L�uxr.a wOM we mUm NOW p —,.0 —., uwc — uxn-a-sasx PA20-1325 Z 0 u - K 0 0 u �V RENDEZVOUS APARTMENT COMMUNITY PHASE II Vicinity M< - No Scale • Ts T Co,kR B+B Wb 0 or A �*EE�PBaorl cm�,o. S> "61j c �,,VV°j gpQSj y Pv/b 5 �oPs 0 8 R�c' Now Lary V.1" Ul W'4� CdIWIA°?� (Wb'i1a U' �Y`e s' knvelWa A 1g T% TI`\y N' bClw 111666fff ` Y G cPr µC.yf�bty 4 .• �e M �q° 4 o � �. S Ad acent Land Uses u : wi mi m n W p3L.nmre e w n w• .w<„ nhdaWl. .r uw < wv .wiry L0.<aJ<wdlup.vu.wu .wwr.nm.x S.c.Lr Ne11LP unemnl.omm�wly <w.wr,W1<.r.mlr::xJ.r.rr nvl:auwlyrnwercc. c.wn trnWwd.f4l.wmmm mw.mry AYh'a 9a4-JNa all lawtr ytleJ mwun pucelu P�2uf W s,wUn Aaawane,x.l �rh�o lone.,1. , pp ovu1,I'1. 1. MpJU)Np Boutl4u^P4µ<0.e..S]UwII11ItI. Yin woRnu. S1.1oc-.w Jr1M1.<]CuiryUlo}r, T.wcuU, xm<Jlk,elaPm<m P.<LY lPW4) nl wn Uwkna U.wry P<u.kmiil (M) 1 il. krervropmed Iwnd U..: fwrry MliJ<nw1 GY.)9Trf }}9]A, 991 V91 a! 33 Y}M w11 BWiwq M11 (Su Sk,J ALL3 fw U.uilU TuW PwWW .vn-311,91Y,f lur gmenen wIJWa Ne.-of Lu1 • 331,IDI f Ue. TM1<eeJnr�wC. .•IUI GII,ILI kwR ,<wavrll L l.wm<1J, sik R.il) 'Upwi Pwlwn-IW L`vu( .wn.uw,un) 'Lox.i Pwuon•IN 11mu (W, Popoun opo,<J -]91 Umu NI L mIN113 A.r.. I] tll M'<II W U.I. Pn ncr. r Ty, vefUmu 0.[WIr<J wet weJ .rzJ Kru ori- Rmi- u IN - I UnCuru.J u54 u'9 h<Jrnan Bntruxo 3672R ITU el 2 IJIT-t fi Pukry Re9wed 211 a<d UMrc:wJW T4W PwkW SPu,.RmxkJ 21U2 Cm <r<d uvo,.red uxlcw.l weber vlAwn,Al.sub. -4 Lbwrry<I<PutW Sp1[w AovW.J-fi Y • 44•A Cl -f. lon Tyw (Thr, Ropaa.R «<s9Paklvy<cu «< awrL<dwn norm I:wnbm sww u.Wm CIl 3 Al- "p. se U Ty, 5h Enn<ueNmn P yp 11 T„ Ica Scope of Work T' n-1. ownpuvn mCwnAl uxlPwk,Uw.11,. w1111, Wnw � mRwlJvyUvoo�Pw,JWn�m•Jraam�u MVro<yal<I`loryryeuµ. .<retr razW.oyuµn( .wN x[hJ 7TUM1ENIJ, <. nd one Nxuv •P em�JWW.r).L„[vpon mmW -I Wwelt So.lmp <m<m n «nvy e.u'<p[ wwJ Jlaw awnwolc<I wl emJW.w unvpuvin ,. rnJ cwuvwuw of x Iv. o x,l •rn< lilkvµ. ur4 n rnl.eu,x uuW r< nLrc<. wJx Jrmny. I.m wlwLre wpw.mem. rceJry.J w.nvmwW. WpMPn4ou<m<nu TM1<Sn, lmpwremnl. Im Jul prvlrU v. wbe r<umplWwJ wake wprv<p<rmnr aw arz �k..nMJ m V eaur J<url un Jw o,n Erew wwd Lwd.<.p<,v.mk.me ur.xW. n e, Bul whena-v W Uw wrb<r.1 ACI:Eab'IRLE-)s Jui wet bo Pron✓<dO llh.nwrbu of wrl.w th, --I Bvw level yr ell <uJ<miil bwly ,.IWI be <ovWerNle eJur t' Bwl dW.x CRC110T,13r.w roI<n UwlUN of U.lovinumb<r of rowW Pow wu bul 9 n wnpbl'tr�oh. v'.bn prorr.m.or CRC ]Ile g,.nrrlux ✓<r room. u,) rzu. J�y.wM.luul of N ImwJ Boor unn,` Ip• of M wvu nurW rgry 5 ...0 wMM1 nwl b< rum Boa r.ywr um. To ww. eRul azvu nvwnJ,k Umu Ln (I)Uw TIP<�n11. BwWW ell v (I)Umr T)p<IC BwkWvl3 [I)um3 T)w TA BwWire ell-17 (,-Tl'p.IA flwWirellJ (11 Uml T,p<JA PwWire v11 Ilmlvll Sound Level p 3 u ov,xk Uw CT'EI. 45 JB mnmu AL I k'unv. AJJrex, Prov uW Rwil for A�r�l u l rep tyro yr Lud,vaw Ar:hJe.r All PLn-1, GnphvSN<1vr1A Bu SuIe.W SoM •view IT.rNp STRJ Eu,wy Rowm Lrrc rn bold vdlab<I YIIJmeviwu (meu. ud and 9TE�1 1 wm W Jwevien of<II <u,ure W prepouJ.uemenu A: (nMNewJr.r<r<n<) o uJ bllwarnl dunJxppLwbk <vivv, nl3 A3 L-I U.Wvw wd Lld N<muumwn a<rb.ck. Lam xll prop.nY lwa r Wdun<vron of xll<nrnuy ud prow.N atrulwe.. azuulr.Lre bwIJW ,dbuk< LoxuonxW Jun<vipn ofxll luukvpW UW pWnLin Al waBrwr.IJuJ.J) LwnwnuWX'm.ildun.vronofdw<xuln,ImJW mrc.uW pukW .Ia1L Al.w AI-.•\. 11 feu,Ury ww prupuwJ untie rwi LmW L.I.wJJunevwnaf allwdrercl.rwm(ml.rwr.W 1. CL.2- .me vw�nv.,4v l,uawq anJ W`Pu•J) 1-fledlrwlxyluawu �Ibw.r P• bvxw vl WmrNon wR nl 3.UJ1 N'A PMavvluu ryn<m. wl lurv<J tin bwIJW, \I.ilbw lwavon, xhd Enclumre, <burU 51. 1-SLl p-S p All propo,<J publw rmprmemenl. Allp rtnp<mJhueM el ell.Led,pvkW nnJ wJ.mw wIy cL:T, cua r. ner.waW wPrnPeazJnn hraw,wnWnsw xr cca, nla kn awar rrem w bwklW wJ Pon Imkwrw cm. ilr<<app�a mmPwe qurc um) ST^I (K'we via L-S sTt. I Label mrerw aW ear.ry ruvNraNw Jw.wovunlry Yrll wofmill p.k n W -1 N. irc, xrW n SUfnkoWl Na<pu.n<Im of Ih .'m.y wW w<onJlaznr'-k ol.<I (dproporW) STt.i wN1k+.bIlBl<J An (ABAI.u.urbk rouu,b '~umer\Tay. Ire.IM1vkrclown YvYW SpkY. F'I..Iry Vehmk L'nu1W ,_, (wopnWwfukx<) -1 Lm-.mnof allemnW uWpopm<J Soe<ILi31v.pWwa•: Ynr robe reb Vpw Allyu AB I, ST'.I 1,Pl. v,d Tal Sheetlndex All u;w'. cell1=11 p 3v Ylm B.IJW G Ilow I•W, RwIdW UFWw YLv BwINre tl JEl,vu RwIW p II IWw Wu .1 R 2. B.ldW II Flow Ylw dW 112cw Rw1dW 11 Ekrwrnrc Bldg I IL Plm. S.n, aW Ekvvuu Pw dal J 1'bw Plw NwIdW 1 ilow PWu PwILre 1 Ekvvwv - Plv, Seo, II tlln yµ.. P[ ho 3 aW Nkvalrov nn ercww ni.'Lr�.��m B1IJW ,1leWr Elerwu,'rJ B.LWy ).1 Colm tT<vwev BwWre)A-0111 wu Bw JW II-F:lervru, B1%..-1 Nm. Uvµ<. Cobr AT Sry LWrW .S-1 PMrom.vu Plw 14 EI] hn. I.yMW tmw<I � er Pln BuaFAVMiell.�.xpe A,uur YIN IP 1� Ls w.°dn i<,wd1<m<Pkm VAI.GNAUIh'C LLLU om< rod UrW. Pbn hen nJrl CG-iwCG-) Cun<quJ UreJW Plan(<m u+k) cowl 11-1H Uliliry Plm(x e,1 uh) CU�3 b N�] Ibrc.Prwl111iLry Pkn (wn u6) CI VI1. SITE PLM' STEM ROPo,W sne Plan STF.3 Ennire Rwen sik Mnlm Building Types and Heights .4- Rhk T3➢r nwmber swm. alyl ll.ylM PwIJW II PwIJW It PwIJW 13 PwIJW I4 ] RwIJW IS ] en4JW I4 ; Bur'JW IT J - Bw WItl En<ww Pm I dM1Uwµ< 1 oil WaM1Uwµ< II 91G Building Addresses BwWW II - VuJ on R.vxhu Cddww R- ...' B.kkm 13 un.anywJPn xwxmuilJmw NnaJ RwWW II Un-N.4rcJm Nuub ulJww RoW BmWW IS Un-.a.ayrcJm Ruxb Cildww 0.xW -1, 14 Un.4.yrcJ tit Ruwb Cildmw 0.oW B,Wre IT Un":::Jm Nano C,-ROW .."m II Un-N j. NxbCildmw ROW Solar Panels TM1<Ropn will inhale Solu Yavl, meimuJan Ju Nookof the ApuLn<nl XwIJW. EVCS Conduits Runk I'.onMl!wall fwv<-11--I1.11<Chu Swxw(EVCS) v Jwwnon Ne Sne Plan Al all Huµ« prmIJ<a<wWwl w eoWwl. fm hnw<F.\'CS ur<J to uxo ..--T-%X1'C3li,p m Applicable Building Codes Tlu, wnr.+Jnn.werM wpm m. RwkWy J'uJe 3419 CJUww R-4 Cak Nnhw..l ):pJe 3UIY C.IJww lhchw,mlCW< PlwnbW 3UIYhldwvx PlwnbW Coh «Lrww tlrcr Cole I'll«IUwmu 1've CnJe Ulv sWvlud, , p Ir erT<mrw. Nwn<w eJ. xn dull c9wm Bde IL.kalmtrn Blmk Will Ual on3ruluwl5<un I'.nury (Ylar'Bruwn kLulbua.. J/Putµ. Rwrm �h'm \'mbl<Irvm N< kexdy In II<J mPluazi PkyyxwW Cywpm<m wwdxvlrwn<r wka,d'wr 3.•.�wnrinrwab pkrrW Grrmw P. ' .S.6, 7. 1. 10. 12,W 13 el P-1 ALP 31413, r of Nn rnJc'sewoIlil Pw o11-1. wry `YIaJ'IUL01�914)]p0oc, 91431- "4-"17, YII-J'N1U81. Y94)%Lk•, 9a4a]a413, 944)]W1) Ra.d AdJm,w.: lLCfi3, )Mri. )Ipl). HP)9, 3UI I1. )Un , an n.lL159. HITS ud )UI4] NwuM CJBww Need T<mnu4 CA Ynn ZPn1ry: Lm<J Ilnelupm<nr U,nkY IVUU) ) ercnl P1.n u.Nkn.Bwr: hkJtwm Ur ry0.euJ<nliil lK,1 Ed,BreIaW N.: 'Up�i Iaruunol Puvel - IAJrJwJY IIvwW m 'I.ax<�Yuu not Puc<I-\'aanVGuhJ . d U.:\IWU-Fwrly Nud<mN Nepeud «n<ua W L`mu (Wepropmlillnl wlPrpp.w Ya Umr. 2"_1-Y}11n•1}1I I-H< Umu P<e Au< a 71111, Nmli.rrmiry L 4 brmn,n.n-3 P YIH LwJur Buun Xwh+lur N. ) hn )1` vlut«u.Irc T LT.uwm Bay Oubua c;A 911Ue (Ifi1)J�49R1U L chuecl '�<Ux117k<•W •v,-11 Sw IFiw`Ju<Cwl.n<vl . wl (95n }94rww In.. .N3RYY Smvr AJ t'W ircu evm 1'3 W<u,. 'th.Stl IIT ,. 1o) rJIIT (Y No- 1 1717 r W111 il k'wrlvm Ar< YkweuA N. Y5011 real sy.um. 3 .a Ptl YBunb W synem. Gw Kuu u P< (4V3)}19L>II Y.invxd ti.11 % W, 1wwY. P5 I 54 W'<n A c A-.1 Swe P Sams 54- CA 931R5 ILS)569A'314 LYrJ Eryin 1W UfiYl5dd$ Y4UJIU -.cA-1 pI.) SVJv Baru W N., R- I Cuut Swr< I I I '-CA Y1UIU _31.3]a7 _la C-1- «uJlren.PW3 fi%ly'klhw Way (m Bwba. cn 9nn ImJ949.1a1 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 A0.1 Phase I AND Phase 2 Project Unit Distribution & Sizes and Parkin Demand """"• '" '" . W •' " "" '",...... John W a t s o n Are itcc ts, Inc. "'• 726 Chclharn Way `" Santa Barbara '^• CA 93108 (805)-969-7280 _o> A F' Q g Unit Distribution & Sizes and Parking Demand o o c U cd v d v d it:m d PA20-1325 F II 4 Copyright na•n I.J. .... :� PROJECT STATISTICS A0.2 Area Statistics I:.n1Mr CI a<aJ<nw,A a nn Plu,c l.wl! . rl,n9� ..wa. r y. w r„n• w". • r n rwc z r.u�...,,..r � .,�, «.r nJ,r r I'rgnr Tall, EJ9.461 199bE4 Upper and Lower Site Pro'ect Statistics MT'v sN.l'NW 1.9N.1NLCY, 9a0.1]OJ106, 9J0.1'ro001, YN-)NfAtl, 9JU10010, 940.1]Oal; 9N.1'ro-0I1. W M m.rg<Juv"m• pvcU a qn of au,+PDluaum 4n, P h F;a.].1. Iµ IE.NI?ufPu.el.\Lpl14El,ALp Buok]IG,Yy<+t0Y 11 urYu Crry of m�w> town „ranw�u<, Yum �I aummr, oolYLrwJ u•rnopm<n a<a,y Irm-sl u<N ya..��Lmnl(np ca.uyr,� ro a 1."a un: pq wn9f pvul sAWuf�rly llo w:ur Corv4nuan) ronof Yuael hu - x•nWr J<a Koq..a-MWIJ.mrlylleuw v.n•is�..� s To�I V•on Mn I.000J9l,f Ei 9l Nin mm na nrn 99+.491+r nEA„< ••aaE.9t),f ISnAn.r .-vl,lnlrr ^lA Yry p�co�m� sn,r u tTm nowoa ��wssul.r Ln co..•.tn. HwIJw,, Upin sn<HnconnrweurJ niElvsa?Yn-?I5s iEl]rr La.<r Yile Rnr+Napaal, I.I IOI,IJIn)I,lol -)Iv. ul,f Y,Jf!59I,W1-!9% Urrcu, nN Pvlw vW nn. <vn+ >w tmnll ii+wW") aaurec: L sintRn�ltopo�p 11,G90,r tl G9N111,101 -ESY. Emur sru rusug vW Ifnve" w uWGan 9olur Cor<.u, ru lln Cunruu un) UDq(65l sll- IIi EI!.11a al)) /40!,911 • a]!i sr'x Rnn nop,rup Lw(lll lUt-101,191.Y9,165)/nl.Ml •J).i mu(99J<901-nLJsI. EUE.IJI)'99J 901 •56n Um� y0. .af llnn, wreJ orrJ<J RoviJ<J HohJcJ n<J UriC��<J <r<J UrJ:nneJ I H<Awm 5a 5Y Et sa It •noon 9x .: .E n aE � 'o It 9 T9il IN , ;� tt ], <9i'ne (Carnal U"Ca n<J uJ •1nJ11 o v w pnn on (wvn.J Ury rr<n) 4 w Dan, upR sl���cemuuuoq s mazsn-Jw. low•]�'9)9�i']ml llaqul/ Enlu<slrl. „aW.P•�p�..H ngnY[L anQcCLnrf"vuununL ,Warun Tfq s uJLr4Uvm n' < �T>ye Apwnex, a.l SA U Tsp<SHH 1-IIO 11'L'• tn°��aD9m H rq . Tn I It.t Ima V, ig. of Sidewalk Plan n Architects, Inc. 726 Chelbam Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 'o �J It, < j 0 i PA20-1325 Copyright 0 SIDEWALK PLAN Exhibit B 1 r Lower Site Plan John Watson Architects, Inc. j 726 Chelham Way i Santa Barbara CA 93108 (805)-969-7280 l I � 1 g�g O T A ao�A �D _.c3E PA20-1325 LOWER SITE PLAN A-1.2 a -Ell 4i ------- --- Al' J r John Wasson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara ........... _ 26 ih N 126 15 COV 10 / / .. y^'•"• _ y -� �y _- Un 11 (905)-969-7280 r� mw ASPH -_' ;�_:^•=��� _� --�- - � - I x' UrtCOV $ � 1,111 '- 1,16 t, '�. ii % i CS 2 Cov 1 . uls 9 w , en s ws UnCov 1 .rY Q _ S• E 11)1 •'iH Hy W 91 93 9] _1 .S +rye _ r r I51:: 11 -c Ills i � 1�It)1 IL 1 SN " lulu_ i. ,� 0" Il:zi •' )n � ___ ~� ' S� Ip6 ISN. I 1 �� / .. uneov � � i\ 7 a - Plll � "'���'• dl : �- B I © � : � n° \\ . loc. 2' w 9 1 u Ix _ .,.$ r _ ra• Ins 1)z, c ie)w i ni ins Y ° �.;. \\ �-� "lanw y �` �. --= 3l, wn" wxa ela lsx'• - o - wl � '':� 15,1•'': = Ilnl)I•�ii.V'ijl _ _ �" L U - n° In 11 _ �� 1 � 1 1i2=1 1)1P l '. }•I la Zt �_ Illli I .I _ 4-^&_ l a" � � Illll,'.'. �lv tV UnCov 9 � co _ r 11911W 19J � m d 0 O O o a�i O r J '181iln O F y O gti12jr Y'11,8119t1 1 0 p 0 o �1 ?'1� `.\ n ball„� g o o O O O PA2 25 John Wal son Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara Bed Rm al n 11 `•1EA _ `� L—--- C A 9 3 1 0 8 O Bed R. al O -- -- i (805)-969-7 ° 280 - e uW Kitchen ; gy 2 ® ® ® ° F OIO i _ Hg 00 O 1 C } { f. Low . MEw O Y " Low cl�ul ' ;wox CJ .. Clo al " I _-- — —�_ � �.,. Ian _ �I t — 0 O y �r 'J -� 5 Ent e Kiichcn itc en 5 ;,I Bcd Rm al Ball 0 OHO Ntil 0 gal- V � J LUJ Cs� c__ —J � E ____ -1_ _ _ _— a •a .'. . �' «:h- .. • ;. -1y. 1-m. � i,r�. i a15'�..ixYr u.+y- G ,d 1.14 w o '� :r Unit IA Unit I Unit 1C Area = 651 Area = 726 Area = 779 w w G O 'vV�" N a a w�. Qw"a°OF. °®° ..i---AA A PA20-1325 u O O R �` �/ Bea Rm az � [led R,n n I i Kitchcn •� ® • Y , ' O 2B 4b'Rg Low s ox a' 5 auvox v , ' AHF— O O ----- s ®. �+ Copyright % ,o s _O _______ ]f B�2 e I' 2A. �� ° s Fl.,F F/1-�, J �CLo qL__ LO a MNHR ioBNI ...%r. O, ti Ned Rm a2 - Bat „ a�°ew3 ((O�� O - - Op r !. _ Entry . : 1' �.y 4Y O t �.. »a,. ,��. ., ,. UNIT PLANS Unit 2A Unit 2B Arca = 1163 Area = 1202 91 A-2.1 5' 20' RNDV2 WaIIT cs .� II r��oa"`. W a.aaa o.a nvi ry N�tl• N-Nam�ai.tll NO COLOR ' J w H Q W.��E.��..,..„' =,q ye55 o 0 � •O Q Ex � �y aE x.uinB WJI � �JI<•�r•„ve �� � CG L nk�mLoa. pox-n.�m, ;o s I'I a�u.ra.�o �a, N no cup 93 E Ilzaw.o��ltl•ert„ ° �a n � P ni ni unli In ^ wIc•oe uao -ao r�--�` Etyy � F8 w�cma .ary le•oc use Env x w.n�IF•xuro N .•r�n. r. rmnr�am« rn � to wni,.�m iwo sn<,r r.«I, A U noel i nSu?1 I n Hl!v 1 OI Y' John Watson A rchitcc ls, Inc. O 726 Chelhatn Way Santa Barbara � C A 9 3 1 0 8 w -- _r_ I� - 'I (805)-969-7280 KitchcnEntry BNI CIo NI Low _ k O Bcd R. N2 O O O e ,r s� ohx O MBa y R r I o I Bcd R..:u , 10 o o Unit 2C RNDV2WallTes Unit 3A Area= 1257 Area= 1341 w I/4„=1-0„ Im„ = 1, AoO -31 F. .01ornFQ WOOOmonEntry CIoNI: PA20-13213a� �i5 O , BN) 9 12 Hall 3B rCopyright LI MBR BcdmN3 �8 UNIT PLAN S Unit 3B Area= 1431 1/4" = I-0" 5 0- o s��ohSl�.FrI . .Ivis"elR,n,'u mr)� nF ne,'w^�ui�ll.yorae )'nA„�u`ao,' eb�mNcRnloru hWc .... ........................... ................................ .............. ........ Piz John Watson I (D F—rm Architects, Inc. 726 Chelharn Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 Q EA (805 969-7280 Typc2B I*ypc 2H Type 2C 0 ❑In. '3 Type IC Unit El 2 .22 LO L I it# 12 Uni UL I L❑1 227 0 Unit# 121�� Type 1C 0 0 127 O Type 2B Type 2C A A mEl Typc2B (D .............. - . .............. .................... . ................................ U T is Building G Middle Floor Plan rn ...... ............ ............... ....... ... nwrrv.c op .................. ..... . .. . ... ................................ A n 3E 0 F-r-M PA20-1325 ED Type 2B e 8 Ty e2B Type 2C nits O nil 1213 upe IC ni 2 unit Copyright 'THZE111 ZEE o-c nit ME] l�� U) 12 lype I C L;-I [3 121 EP 0 2 Typc2C 0 Type2B CD C) C3 Type 2B (0 (DEM D.. BUILDING G .......... licitin .......... ... ........ ......... ................................. FLOOR PLA Building G Lower Floor Plan A3-G] it . . . Top ove E-1 John Watson Archilccts, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa to (805)-969-7280 L 6 4 I dge-7- LP-� 72, A El 2-1/212 2-112": 2 4 F-a- E — F.- Uottom 0 U Building G v a 0 Roof Plan Top 0 0, al 5 El 0 PA20-1325 o� o o � o� 2 Unit 2B Unh2(' Unit 0 j i'm — G [j ni(N c [0 23I In 233 Unit IC nit Urii 12 Eno Copyright J 29, 2022 rit# 1237 Unit# 12 Unit IC Uni 123 El 0 23r� 0 unit 2C G Unit 2B e e Unit 2B o BUILDING G FLOOR PLAN A3-G2 Building G Upper Floor Plan If John Watson Arch11-ts, Inc. 726 Chelha. Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 ON w ) W N J/ � a Building G E E End Elevation E a 3 3/ 16" = I'-0" U T U E o 47 QUU �0Y,4 � N N c 3 E PA20-1325 d ® ;0� ® ® 7 ® ... Copyright rn�s .r:e, ion 7� 30063 30063 07M r T77M 4L 1 &M FNI 7FMM-1 E W-- -- --- -- -®- -- -- -- - -- -0- -- --- -- -- BUILDING G Building G l ELEVATIONS Side Elevation 3/16" = I'-0" A3 -G4 �— � I -I_ 0— �— 0 II_I- 0 _I■ Illllli�ll ��� ��� I, Illlfl��l .... .... .... .... .... .... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ Patio Area 524 + 499 = 1023 Building H Middle Floor Plan 1/8.. = 1'-0., G2 Building H Lower Floor Plan John Watson Archi tccis, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 w a � a G A C U w •TU E r� Q d U c o .=' 'd :D N a Q P4 .07 F PA20-1325 Copyright BUILDING H A3-H1 If John Watson Architccts, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 of in 101 ® 101 101 101 101 ® 0 30063 w y A o .°a E E v Building H North Elevation rn 3/16" = 1'1" Q U U C ..................... PA20-1325 ._... .... ...... ..._......._.�.._._._.:�t.-.i.... 101 11 0 30063 ® 30063 -- Copyright BUILDING H Building H ELEVATIONS West Elevation 3/16" = 1'-0" A3-H4.1 11 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 I] ® ® ® ® ® ®11 fi T ®...w ® 0 ® ® �... ^••• 30063 I I w x ftfl E°a o_ Building H " 4. N South Elevation a o 3/16" = 1'_0" ¢ U V ti�� o r � > T o a � p 6 - - - ...._. PA20-1325 30063 m 30063 F -- ^ Copyright n�wn+e.:o:• 1 BUILDING H Building H ELEVATIONS East Elevation 3116" = P.O.. A3-H4.2 a�nv: au,r John Walaon y Arc hitccts, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Eavc Santa Barbara Eare Eavc Eavc Eavc C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969_7280 Io �4:12 130m alttl !� Rid c i Z. Eave Eavc Eave Building I Building I Building I Section A Section B West Elevation (East Flipped) 3/16" - I'-0" 3/16" = 1'-0" 3/16" = 1'.0" Building I Roof Plan 1/8" - P-0" jok, 101® ® ro 2;4 I � � Typc IU Typn IU �. .� c o ,d a v a unua FF- Unit# o aE 1622 1621 C, .4 F Building I North Elevation PA20-1325 a" 3/16" - P-0" Building I Upper Floor Plan 1/8" = 1'-0" (D ®101 101® Copyright 5ti ❑ Alt sE,9toGamgeGarage Garage Garage Garage Garage Garage Sto T4 I Building I BUILDING I South Elevation 3/16" = 1'-0" Building I A341 Lower Floor Plan John Wasson ❑ _ � Oil Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara ` ee'ype3A A (805969I9280 XX v ypIit Type 'T T [A e[M2 Uni1A XX23 O 0 Uni1# XX26 IJnit# 28 U n, Unit# 0 0 O XX�21 ® -:- Unn# XX24 0 Ur'" XX27 .22 ® lye IA Type I El � Type 2A e2 99 w, 99 13 2 a .... .... ........................... .......................................... .................................................. 0 n w U ?v Building J y s° Middle Floor Plan N I/8„ EOA!d N 7 " ............T°........... " �c3E - 0 ¢ PA20-1325 C )ypc ❑ E `s 3A Typc IA T pc IA ,e Typc3A I w, I 7 I u Copyright 00 In o �e O Type T pe IA Ar Type IA Typ❑� L. J�' Ele� e e reu, ��Kr, e e 93 mw ............ .... ... .._....... ottom ........... -- BUILDING J Building J Lower Floor Plan A341 �l m dl 112 12 �I llII Ir iiii .I. lip � IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII, IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII NONE 00 No 0 No �I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII. (IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 30063 `l End Elevation Building J qw,, tM Building J "Short Side" Elevation 3/16" = 1'-0" Building J "Long Side" Elevation 3/16" = 1'-0" M. IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII soon Ms. John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 0 G N ° E � � w o TU E o a Q UU 7YU x 0 PA20-1325 (0 — Copyright BUILDING J ELEVATIONS A344 - ---- TJ I John Watson ArcMtccIs, Inc. 726 Chetham Way — Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 S.`c 4124`12 Slone4,12�, W d � a E Ea o caw t .T 0 h Q, a. 30107 v o A 'd m o a� nn .p — _ - — — — — — — — — - w�ovz ....�....� �, Q ':"aN�cnu,Nv�n�baeJf °mnPA20-1325 lv]Sglid^nf n.00k,.l s, 11 A'tt Aiu Roof I.—Slo0u6 �+� Copyright -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- ---------------.4� A3-K1 Paul Bathrooms East Elevation e Su S- A0.9 for 0.9go6d MLu--,vv,n Boa MuLvuin aL—iu on, Pool Bathrooms RaoCPlans 1/4" = 1'.0" Pool Bathrooms Foundation Plans 'o John Wa(son hita as, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barh. C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 w 2' d G A 7 �a ° 0 U U E 0 N O G O of ¢ a" 2 F. PA20-1325 Copyright POOL BATHROOMS A3-L 1 Garage 2 5 Ca, Gangs 33,41,42 7 Cur Garasrc G,,,gc 39,4 8 CLGLugc 22 Car "Doubts Garagc 6 Spacc Carport R-2 WAIT— 8 Car "Doubts Rc TYPT LAEnclosure III117�71171 G—gc 3 4 Ca` G�ragc G.- 4 4 Car C—gc \ ltNmsh Enclosurc Garagc 43 6 Car Garage 5 C., G!,.gc I IC Sp.5c and NNI R... 9 low" 1 7�4. John Watson A 'c hi t - is, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805) -969-7280 O u O.t� cd 0 I Copyright I Plans A3—M1 i A. 1 3' John Watson e'yr " s -rvu rw�r Arc Meccas, Inc. 726 Chelham Way -- Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 Ttpical 2 Car Dccp —ge Secdon I Car Dccp Cangc (a) I IC T I Car Dccn Gangc Section 4 Car Garage Rear Elcvauon Tvpmal 1 Car Deep 4 Car Garage Fmnr Elcvauon e re. + 1 fp (805)-969-7280 Side F.lo�auon risr�" 3' 1 Car Dccp Garage Widr'I'nsh Enclosure r.... 7_vpiol 1 Car Dccn Cangc \Y/nh'I'nsh 1 Car Dccp Gangc W1hh NC ParkingPront Elevaunn Attached Rear Illaauon flndosure Auached Fn,nt P.levation w m JM F-1 F11 �aW - 1 Lj L� L� U Y � N 8 Car C rage 2 Car Dccp Garage 22 Car Garage Front and Rear Elcvauon Sidc RIc-dr, Fmm and Rear wt4 a m v a m d v Q w 0 F PA20-1325 I � AIInnnnF , -.w� ........ v t Gangc W/ Tash Enclosure Accessible Stall Garage W/Tnsh Enclosure, Accessible Stall, Garege W/'Trash Enclosure, Accessible Slall, Garage W/Trash Enclosure, Accessible Slall, Copyright Mailroom, and Pool Equip North Elcvauon Mailroom and Pool Equip South Elevation Mailroom, Pool Equip Wa1 Elcvauon Mailroom, and Pool Equip East Elevation .r aF. man 6 Car C,rpnn 6 Car Carport 6 Car (.arpnrt Free Standing'I'rash Enclosure Elevation Re,r rle Orion Sidc EIc Ydon Eron, t+.le�rrinn '" -"" Garage Plan A3-M2 If John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chetham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7290 EY_tea — GarageNotes INTERIOR FDIIS11M All G.,W,In end C'.iling, Shill a. Dry W.11W, T,pcd, T. —d, And `r,-. r< Fag'W Ig"Typc%Dryn,ll Ccihn[, Shdl 11,.. (2)Let.n oYSIR' a TYM % D,.nMrell DRAFTSTOPS 2 Gate Detail P-idV •11St.p,wn,In..m.,p,ra—llmoW on n,n pl.. S..—d 3-M 3^=11.011 A—CACCHSES' Pmvid, All., A-- w,haun on IL„ plan. NOR: N1111,l. ec..<,w m —h ere s'. er. n. b.. of DnR Swp,. All A— Aa.�u, ShWI tl.al� I low R•uJ -,M1,p •r.. pn, of a I hour rwf rol,ng e.nmLll. Roof v— Pwtvavn.a•kWnc.ln1s%j orvnn•m par im b- sq.lq.ofwuf M1 •, fj —f of mnf �L,ud nn euumpoon ,ha, ca,M1 vcn, mt pu,m fnn n(unbleI11., a .hf(1n fium Jn, mpown:ovuk v,. . ,di,rcon uly,uyw un.mlr .. "S,".1 „h" :M1n JnuinRu W tad "S,prn,u SPwa' Ir% •n-w w:lw,nir J,w.r10,-daWur Lr O "nnn]—,di nr Lr".\pu,m.m llni, Pcnmc,rr \C'Wh'c.n,Wing,n Juw,drnWc of Ju�n,uf,heaJm,R nwu br v,nW.,ed up•r.uy ., � ,y IL O � D.nolnel SVfl.Nn n,ee Roof\'cnl on SloPin'Pmf O.-i .�'.' U > U Color Specification �o EMB N N 7 � ¢UU c o " N U ^ N N c 3 E ¢ x-11H PA20-1325 l� Copyright TR 215.2022 e d • \ \\\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\/\\ Id 1 i TRASH ENCLOSURE la //\\// \//\\//\ • GATE/ SCHEDULE U \ ( 1 \ Trash Enclosure Gate Elevation \/\ Ld A3-M4 Color 1: Omega #20 (Similar to DE 6155 Soft Ivory) Color 2: Omega #2-1/2 A948 (Similar to DE 6312 Dusty Dream) Color 3: Omega #413 (Similar to DET654 Creme Fraische) Color 4: Omega #A 560 (Similar to DET605 Drifting Downstream) Color 6: Omega #1/2 A 865 (Similar to DET665 Grain Mill) Color 7: Omega #418 (Similar to DE6200 Handwoven) Roof Tile: Tesoro Blend Barcelona 900 Boral Roofing t j White Vinyl Window Color 8: Omega #18 _ (Similar to DEW325 Vanilla Shake) I Colosseum Travertine "Roman" Chiseled Limestone Cayenne Color 10: DEA158 -- -- ``- ---�'` Northern Territory) :`I U Q kj41-- �_N40 Color 5: Omega #414� _��_ / McNichols Grecian (Similar to DE6380 ^4►�41►�4►17840032 Clouded Vision) �0.074 Used at Gas Meter Doors Sand Canyon y Flagstone "Cream" ' J French Limestone "French White" Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Blend" Exhibit F John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 w a a r" a o°e U c, U � o N V) ? 3 ^ E N 00 0 dxar.,t-� n LJ MA A6.1 Building #12 (Type G) End Elevation 3116" = F-0" Building 912 (Type G) Side Elevation Color Scheme 2 3/ 16" = I'41" Rendezvous Phase 11 Color Schemes and Materials Color Scheme #I Scheme N2 Scheme #3 Scheme #4 Scheme #5 Scheme #6 Scheme#7 Scheme #8 Integral Plaster Color Similar To: Description I Omcge #20 Body Color I Body Color 2 Body Clr Body C'Ir DE6155 Soft Ivory Light Cream 2 Omega 112-1/2 A 948 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DE6312 Dusty Dream Medium Tone Grcy/Green 3 Omega #413 Body Color 1 Body Color 2 DET654 Creme Fraiche Light/Medium Cream 4 Omega #A 560 Body Color 2 Body Color 3 DET605 Drilling Downstream Dark "Dull" Green 5 Omega #414 Body Color I Body Or DE6380 Clouded Vision Light Gray 6 Omega # 1/2 A 865 Body Color I DET665 Grain Mill Medium Crcam/Orange 7 Omega P418 Body Clr DE6200 Handwoven Medium Brown 8 Omcga#I8 'trim Trim Trim Trim EntryTrm Trim Trim Trim DEW325 Vanilla Shake Whilish 9 Boral Tcsoro Blend Root'Tilc Roof Tile Roof Tile Roof Tile Root'Tlle RoofTIIC Roof Tile Roof Tile B-317-R Roof Bundle Taupe -Appm Same Color 0 1DE 158 NorthernTerritory All Doors All Doors All Doors DEA 158 Northern Territory Dark Brown - Semi -Gloss 11 French Limestone "Ryland Buff' hall Tile I Wall Tile 1 hall TIIe I Wall Tile I Wall Tile 1 12 Chiseled Limestonc "Cayenne" Wall Tile 2 Wall Tile 2 Wali Tile 2 Wall "file 2 13 Sand Canyon Flagstone "Cream" Wall Tile 3 Wall Tile 3 Wall Tne 3 Wall Tile 3 14 French Limestone "French White" Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile Base Tile 15 Chiseled Limestone "Sunriver Bind" Bast Tilc Alt Base Tile All Base Tile Alt Bme Tile Alt Note: Color Scheme #1 not used on Phase 11. Exhibit E-1 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 0 COLOR SCHEME BUILDING G A6.2 -1 . W. llllilillilllll!!lIII 'llllllllllllllllullll IIIIIII!lIIIIIIIII!!II IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII an H. no 0 F7m.. ■■i6 .ki.i■ ■■■■ Long Side Elevation Color r---•...--t.:..�-•-�;,r"•jgirir -sue.., _ _.._. _ ..; _ ._y. 00I1I Illiui_ 'uullliulluli IIIIIII�IIIIIII� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII 1111111111� Illlllllllllllf 111 . ::::6 _ :on I�I�I�I ::: ON IIIIIIII111111 ,I�� 1 ii 1F1111IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1 ni:: u::r lj 101 101 hI 101 Iv a ®❑ t11 lff� 3006: Buildings #14 and it17 (Type J) End Elevation rm., Cr6rmr d Buildings #14 and #17 (Type J) Long Side Elevation Color Scheme 4 3/32" = 1'-0" rP-MR MON, n :Im : :: �i :::: o M-11 nol IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illlllllllllllllllllllllf; IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII FP1181-1111111 _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _r IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ':.IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII4, �b- John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 w 0 C N a �a U > V E o is E a v PA20.1325 COLOR g SCHEME BUILDING 1 SCHEME 4 A6-4 Exhibit E-3 .wow, Building #11 (Type H) End Elevation 3/32" = 1'-0" now mm Him pm] FRFMI .... .... E.... ■. ■. Buildings Color Scheme 4 Long Side Elevation Exhibit E-4 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 w m E � w o oa U U a E o U 4O U cir, 7 7 m ❑ o -: a C N N U �'e3E PA20-1325 f (m� COLOR SCHEME BUILDING H A6-5 Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure calms h17 — Typical Garage With Trash Enclosure Typical Garage W ith Trash Enclosure Gara a Color Scheme Assignments Typleel Garage With Trash Enclosure In Bldg #16/Garage 38 Driveway Side Elevation 1/8" =1.-0.. Bldg #16/Garage 38 Hill Side Elevation 1/8'. = I'-0" Bldg #16/Garage 38 End Elevation 1/8" - P-0" L ---------- 1i F—cisc Room East Elevation T/8" = Ir-2Pr Color Scheme 05 Exercise Room South Elevation Fc se Room North and Wcst Elevation Color Scheme /15 e Pool Eathr118" 11-0 C•Icvation _7 Pool Bathrooms East Elcvelion Bathroom Shower Elevation Elevation AlongAlong Eni.Walk 1/8" - 1'-0 1/8" - 1'-0 Garage #35 with Mail Room North Elevation 1/8" = I'-0" ---------------------------------------------- •iii — � - Garage #35 with Mail Room It �°it`°°"'• South Elevation Garage #35 with Mail Room Garage #35 with Mail room West Elevation East Elevation va" = r-o" us" = r-o" Exhibit E-5 John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 �(s COLOR SCHEME SMALLER A6.6 - I�i � + 40R t`+JL wl-Is��ifi. Two Story Colonnade These Three Images Each Use a One Story Arcade/Loggia to Bring Variety, Texture, and Shadow to the Lower Floor of a Two Story Building. While The Two Story Building Proposed for This Project Patterned Alier the Barchessa Loredan,'Ihese Images Are Provided to Illustrate How Different Column Types, Spacing. and Even Diflerent Opening"Type" (Square and Arched) Can Be Used And Still Retain the Beauty, Grace, and Elegance of The Original Prototype. Entablature Entablature's Exist at the Intersection of Wall And Roof In Some Classical Buildings. The Degree of Detail of the Entablature Varies From Architectural Period To Architectural Period, But Is Always Used To Provide A Sophisticated Wall To Roof Transition. On the Proposed Building, The Entablature Adds Elegance and I Ielps The Transition From The Slightly Higher End Pieces To The Lower Center Span. Barchessa Loredan Attributed to Andrea Palladio Facade Composed of a 2 Story Arched Loggia With Pilasters Restingon Raised Bases. Facade Completed Using Unadorned Window Treatments Throughout 'll,c6dldn,gcm v.d,. c.rdvv.nl,k.�ao e,.Jurr,nd Fcmd 1"Pt . fI)c W., .,,pp,ermuu,I4 ,v„Idd..Vd, .n1.cdkcm.cgo.,r,J ll............. k. ngk,,u Al- .......... I ,IhLc Lr,..gq. nnd�nlvm d,y;ofdlk..,r.,. Building Type 3A Patterned After the More Ornate Barchessa Loredan (See Left), This Facade is Composed of a 2 Story Loggia (Used 1 Iere for Private Open Space) With the Supporting Columns Resting on Tiled Bases. The Building's Facade is Completed With Unadorned Windows. While Barchessa Loredan Uses a Simple Single Span Hip Roof, a More Articulated Hip is Provided Here to Lower the Overall Height of the Building and to Create Greater Visual Interest for the Residents and Neighbors Alike. t v r Building Type G Building Type G is a Variation of Type 3A Using the Same Vocabulary, Materials and Forms. �I�o ol�ol�o 7, 0_ ■■li�l -- i:litth!11:1 I'ilallliJlIII III!!I'lllill IF'RR,MIII John Watson Arehl l cc l,, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara C A 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 Building Type I Building Type H Budding Type I is a Minuet of the other Buildings on the Site. Building Type G is a Variation of Type 3A Using the Same Vocabulary, Materials and Forms. 'r� • �� i zr �j Copyright CORNICE I� FRIEZE m Q Chiselled Limestone ARCHITRAVE W The Photograph to the Right Shows Chiselled Limestone Tile Surrounding an Arched Openings, A Decorative Molding Separating the Chiselled Limestone From the Cement Plaster (Stucco) Arch. 'Ilia Chiselled Limestone Does Not Extend to the Ground, It Rests on a Decorative Molding Which Defines the Boundary for the Un-Chiselled Limestone Base Below. r STYLE SHEET A-7 - I Top of Upper Retaining Wall. Foundation of both walls will be planted with medium to high shrubs and ground covers. • Cascading vines will be planted at the top of both walls. Geogrid -Anchor Retaining Wall Color to match phase 1 Rendezvous "Tuscany" RETAINING WALL ELEVATION FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP APN IPS Development Plan # PA3 20-1325 944-370-601 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 0 a' 16' 32' CITY OF TEMECULA .«Olm. z9e VICINITY MAP /ryylRlsB E PROJECT LOC:ANON THOM RRO% 100A � PAGP 955 Sh1-110H x-6 N TS. DIRECTORY OWNER / APPLICANT! TEMECULA VILLAGE DEVELOPMENT, LP AARK C� 91JUJ uien ARCHITECT: JOHN WATSON C RCHIFECS. WC. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: DAVID NEAULI ASSOCIATES. INC. Ivsll b]OLIF f11VD xvD CIVIL ENGINEER: DRC ENGINEERING. INC. CONIACT REND VM1A GENERAL CONTRACTOR PACIFIC WE51 DEVELOPMENT. INC. 321174 T—CYIA PARAW AY, lIRE A 1EMECUTA.CA11- 'CONUCT.IDANO0s90N ------- -- - -w 1 CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND .QTANN AL xA NAIAMAM eIOODca �ACCENT PALMS C e9A0toxU ARwNG IREFS cONM I t OR IIIIIIIA I.. NOSCAPE TRFEs !� c11IRA rAeWIORA - fOUNOAPANSHRU83 I9II ON IT ICA ON Alln - ACCENT SHRUBS/PERENNIAIS SCAT TRIM I CA nWAUILAT MTU I0w I —A comtxxw24 cOtPIxYOccA 1LApnx Roc mw wAlxwnY3 vnxMwc AVlAs.eUSOwcS All NxCls, vNtMsxMIIL OISIcuI.l0 rvtvfxl OvI ISPIAY DNIO ORNAMENTAS GRASSES ,I AN IRIIIIIIAu el MwAIUMUOI41IalAMu wfANRAvu/aRNoswc9owwc iwts NUN e[NNISIA xs xl All uxOfcAII Ap ASUILNCINT 3I UWNIIIIIIIIIIAxxevx,'C'I[puRIMIx1i GROUNOCOVERS St AUIRxII9iNUII et s[Rlluto MlTl Arr9oreult riAul NAN9uI x1MB I'EA "1111C T. 4 All111AUTT ARIBAs O IIAVE MOBwI S-111INTIMH0InlxiWe 11.1MANxsnl 1-1. INYO x19. Cu051 N nC lEULHT Nl9us nx0 ce00N0 COw9NUII eI INCDIID9ABI III IAMUSCAANDPIANS. TAUAUM OLO ox'NscAllou svl AcarueN lOR storlN. SITE CALCULATIONS 1e.appwlw-u.xwr.pas MA 1-1 NAI53111 Et SHRUBS ILAIION IIIANIID DIx311Y 10 A[le[v[ Im IJ9[Ex1 Cpwenc[ w axl TIAN, 91 ORR sunk MS NIau0 It UND IN ARIAS Ixclw Ill PI—Ax All iMAU IINAMIxIM r1AMINL PROPOSED PLANTING AREA 115,1826F IT 6 ACRES) VUES III I xNCSwRI xoIN 191Ixtw NUx MS AOMCixl Nll.IxBINc RASIWRIOSWALE AREA USE 519UCIlnt3 Ax01xAIIKsxAlllwls, TOTAL LANDSCAPE AREA 115.1825FI?.ACRES) 14 1 MN I"SIDIx Dx,M lx w I1'1xtxYpII_ ULA3 IY-wplolS. N.IS aRIA�'DSLA N SHEET I OF 5 DDWNRADRxMAIgNBAllpwmwlxx„DIAIIDN,IR9MLLJ IA" LANDSCAPE MASTER PLAN METER.GAS METER. OR EWER IAT SERALSMINIMUM M OFIIUAWAY FROM POWER PC —MINIMUM OF BAWAY FROM FIRENYDRANib AND FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER AND STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE 11 APN 70- Development 94 - 70-Pla0 ft 944 37 _o15 so 944-370.001 944-370-006 944-370-008 944-370-012 scDl9: r=M). N o a1 H 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370.010 944-370-013 RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP CITY OF TEMECULA ASS.wlg T PETWASI STATION BIKE RAC DRINKING FOUNTAIN, PET DRINKING FOUNT/ POOL / RECREATION AREA ENLARGEMENT 1"=10' LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP 101 LOT. SHADE SAIL. RUBBERIZED SURFACE APN A" S Development Plan p PA3 20.1325 944-370-001 944-370-006 944-370-006 944-370.012 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 SHEET 3 OF 5 ENLARGEMENT rn-rmmm� o to m m' Scde: I"=1n' a faq NORTH CITY OF TEMECULA «NA°Kl A PA DTkArKIT AP/ BUIL CONCEPTUAL PLANT LEGEND -TYPICAL PLANTING 10TAIIIA1 IAI &2W29_q_1LAy.L BtUn g&Q'A A111"I I— GUJ All 121 "A "O 1PEES .. 1"1111AII" 121 1:21" 11 A, I IAI=1.11111 I A I" �11 I-01 A ■ 1,Lu 1 A "DZE'2. A::...— O VE011CALACUNN O —A.- =`Z ...... A I.- 11A A I :A I 'y" AIT A I I A�= -A 10—OU11 SHROS I PEREN.— f R OB A A=- -rob � A... c: A V..A .1 CA 11A "1..TA1V.=-R1 1.2 I =EI LOW AID 1E01U1 11fl— -0—OVERS A:,�0.1'. I D. R011R01E I 1A111N & 0 G I.CW IA1 10.24' 1 .. I Al T .1.1 - 11—DO.A1.1 0.11 = —1--l—AL oWA.1 TAII —E SHEET 4 OF 5 TYPICAL PLANTING LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: rlrmmm� APN WS Development Plan # PA3 20-1325 ' lo, 20 �o RENDEZVOUS - PHASE 11 944-370 001 944-370-006 944- 70-008 944-370-012 sc,l,: V•- 10 1 0 R T H < 0 .o 5 944-37D' 0 944-370.007 944-370-010 944.370-013 al RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP CITY OF TEMECULA -g-, EXISTING PER PHASE I RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD EXISTING r-PER PHASE I I 1 1 t RET. WALL - PER CIVIL EXISTING PHASE T LANDSCAPE CONCEPT PLAN FOR: RENDEZVOUS - PHASE II RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP RET. WALL EXISTING PER CIVIL PER PHASEI Kf'e J WALL AND FENCE LEGEND TUBE STEEL VIEW FENCE] lHIGH TUBE STEEL - COLOR 'BLACK- PILASTER5-8'-6 J/B" HIGH CMU SQUARE PILASTER CUSTOM PILASTER CAP WITH CULTURE STONE VENEER TUBE STEEL VIEW FENCE: 6' HIGH TUBE STEEL -COLOR BLACK- J L— TUBESTEELGATE:6' HIGHTUBESTEELMIN.30' OPENING tOLOR'BLACK ® PROJECT ENTRY MONUMENT/FRONTAGE WALLS/PILASTERS- CMU BLOCK WITH STUCCO FINISHES TO COMPLIMENT BUILDINGS / COLORED CONCRETE CAPS / TUBE STEEL GATE: 6' - ]' HIGH 1 D ECORA THE TU BE 5 TEEL �11 / PROJECT BOUFIOARY IO TUBE STEEL VIEW FENCE OR SLUMP BLOCK PERETER WALL METER ExI51IFIG PER PHASE I O FR AM WIDE TUBULAR STEEL GATE W/ 2" SO _ ...... FRAME AND I/4"PICKETS, COLOR TO BE BLACK OI TUBULAR STEEL POST' A^ 8'-0"O.C. MAX. O2 TUBULAR STEEL PICKETS TUBE STEEL FENCE AT POOL AREA SHEET 5 OF 5 WALL AND FENCE PLAN APN WS Development Plan p PA3 20-1325 0 " 60 Im 944-370-001 944-370-006 944-370.008 944-370.012 Sc de: I'=m' NORTH 944-370-005 944-370-007 944-370-010 944-370-013 CITY OF TEMECULA «wAI,T 951 613430 ➢WNE APPIJCANTP GNDBCAPE ARCHITECT L;°t�.>.PI.,•ral `wlvow'�ussvwrtsmr R NIt -T A. (M... [I. cDauuce R aNAn.w N� ::`X Srx'�a wam MIX,— ,[[ en n,n TOPOGR PHA MasYn Oa'cgl,xu[I"Ibt � [Ilp ]ne �sw A.u�,'�iI91rIXY n �ROJE�TRe GBunIPss l,rt5 il➢OD LONE mETorlo]I os[eur Ireo-s) Po) v[[w n�uNnu�lt-n w/Xa[I , vxw[ss N a v�isnuc uuD usE PROPOSED GNO USE TO v[wx nsaxllN nan a/,rr% CITY OF TEMECULA CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 38043 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD - i - — - - — - — - — - ---- L-11 >i -t------ - ------f-- -- -z5`i.' i 1 `----~ eS+Yv'w hn,.l#1 -�—„L .�e`xe1 BLDG 11 i � � �3 1111 111 I.• - II 1 il' BLDG 12 I'.I'LId / 1• LI__�I r/ 1 -_ - ---------- e I � NOT A PART / II tll1 .f. _ t, _ Sitc PlnnPInformation cross RcrBrcncc— Aal ... rxrrn•nn,l Y�n,�nN . An Yon sF.+a. fxxYbk $[xk P1A IW &nkaN 9nrN Mnx. I �^nr al�rlrr«�n Lrw.mrnal nnn�e.�na,w.,nn..YeJ Er�lwns• h I:I lac> xx:. nN Jws>avxr xl all..xerY ww YrW�+wl nrnxa. sll.-I ]b la�,xl br l�n.cwOJxrxr..nv HyIIxNA.. IAluxa�euN NMI i4�n.rumx.nu+W la 4nn Nl n•Y.'xf anv A I.I In rxNraanxxn xf�Nl [5 NreJlnNx,wJsw.'wes. .rld^C ]udMaow LI 4xuan r4Jn r Inf.11rl>nJuhurd aw YnL'ansr l„.P I.Iw.-JI AI. ..J,rMx>IJ,nannanarJn,n>hM.I. Ja],xarx.aJ r r..,a�.dam rvonwaanx:e wxl:a,lr AL - .oral rJJn«r.wnnrwlrn.b xal.>r,nlaxnxx wa LI' Ni ....xa:e.nlMrxxJl UU-:�ll-1 ally Ilu il� rx+u x'ax.r +nl.l rc> Sul W,n T,. d•I v NA V ro a h•n nl 11 I,arv•�+ur>)urrx rtv lw-+aJ as hxle�ne. W'At 1n. xa�raN4x Tr>Jil:ulx.w.,-,.1 el.l..l ] war• �m n r.�pmxx�.r,n un., f,.[.e.ro Mexn>x I _lua n,�n„arrxx een nn,x«.lurcu.u.... x,unn wrxf x>) fiver Inr n,�wlne CN-I,I U-) 4Vnixm xl �wr `xl>A*„rd ParlWx-w�x Vxa.• 5U•'.111.I IAWM Jxlmrr rne:1 rnaY. tx Brc Im. L.abn. fux Inxuarw • rxae wen• alxvn.N.law.r l a'nan.auna>I x11.liMW xtllnlwl aann.xarUNwlunaey rWa. �I�uhnuw[rnn 5 I .>I.Ir. f�v ail:iuxl �y.Ybak R\�+, 1a f. IxxlbW !oven .11l•I 1 . Nl aa' a�[inu n`�AYO Ab.l, 511: I . xM ru.aaXNN u« ul NYx,I rvhel> ry afro lvuMlaflvyn Al >ll-I ntr IAlxnb llndl�ie•lAlw[cuiNclwl.: i> Limns \;•hxNlL.ryu.>1•w�nllnyn«rl �. fxunl bLa I�..rx.nxren r.nr�.w Yx,ixwox+mp,r,lLa.:xr wh DATA TABLE :xnw. c . erw.6ns. aw Y . v n .exJ Dn a Iy/vro-.l ra me[�ry..Yn..� uNINI N: Eayrr.n...� Irw u•w u'BWAryAruW-tle v)YV-`fw'YnWMxr nmm srA f `I551 oX�ly�imulm) �JyYe -+sx �urY.0 romw- Iw Una Ynwwewme] `wN na(w»rvpv:Nl y Urva .vxA V�A.ua .v..LV 1p-n unLn n.IThrPipn.11 a. wr �n h r Ibsl r,Rs>a .xx.,.x Re.w II m.sA .r I xn�,ls)I' eI, 5P5'[ Iw� eM [ � �•�, — — -- BLDG 17 _ �-- _ t_______` L L. BLDG 13' BLDG 151 iI '--- -- i 1 BLDG 14 t. I # = SHEET NUMBER NOT A PART it ,- BABIB Or BGRINCS u °RMua,Yi ea�tl'cif°x�"Imno"`[Y I qd"4 n[¢Y6 �I a�i[s esa a✓A V �v r BI XreP SH[E�T[IINDE% �1 IP a-r SYMBOL LEGEND• ABBREVIATIONS �� "ws. a yjsm w rzX asm[I urtR (nN ream Inl=— us WaiwR [mrur Ravxord lilrr ],1-uro �s ienin]Y trn In�rt]„�eCeime1�f°5 rA.[ n N+ROL'[�liw. le,x- GSEYENTS A O �.enA e �° N m[xi Uloalli im raama,u%"uesi ,P'xo arsi[ia xaxn \sNa[s vA.ut xu vw>, rums I -a vxe ne/ee-el © `R.�iuo,Lm"x'suH�' v °mi uo .0 usa`i vO1,ea°`i wv`Ya`"rA`Ri m�w10nw' uo n ne/eP-el ss [ e ma vuau I -a O 0(rtCSaK�PfA'G Mm vl � ma YM`u`¢tSU-4 vM ni/YT l� bWL SEE CONCEPTUAL EARTHWORK OIIANTITIES oslj[[sar�s UTILITY PLANS FOR rm s.sn] cv " PROPOSED UTILITIES T. PA20-1325 A B - - - —r---- -- - - - - j—;-7--.---- RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD .,.o, IxN, rr n rs Ix-av I (�1� rsrr Ay e' " _ n,v,.•Mw.sv�� N wxI � '« �1 'I s 1 FF=1109.3 .bs q PAD=1108.8 ' e M IF a 1•. wee"�. e Ic i§ _. f x yWw1 .`li S99 I III 433 �� — — vl R,. �, rs -z' 1 O Irs gl aal, .. I _ „ < 1 '� 1 las '•. ; �� - srs . _ E_�I/�, w,e k�'.'� -� � y.i.1l ___________ sp�. 'I�/ •„y, —; I rtq�o nc7 mar C.I I TRS IICc iiw' �g / '..— l' _ 'o_re �F141 • I �DW.o 'fA��.. q� I�� I.. -_r-__ __ 'l,, `�l FF=1110.3 t I 1 E`• I,:y.fy .! PAD=1109.8 q I rrtM �,_In ] ti 110& T I I iI _ II - nr. - r vm 6I 1 Iex A �� I saJDawn 1 1\.PDT A PART ur `r n vA Aa U No1..tr'.r- i es ,. e , 1A —An .rs rsa, . 4 _ ge�aT SECaIMA A r I a va s v- : M .crane a SECT ONIn ue I e. - r. e• - -- -aa , rNr I I '�vneusw sEerww ea PROPOSED ' •� , BUILDING 1 Lra GAADNO CONSTRUCTION NOTES: o-�.n T. Nar IE Y�Ia..wNN o-o>r�l enrre nn wo.e®I �..,D.rt...wa Da rA ACEY NTS ANp D DICITNIN NOT c O M "rw awd1ew'm09o"�"'wa vnur rlmrsllu n`'�0sa'"`s,a `ter M uul a Nws'ss'.wo nuaxcr ` n.;eN-n el'� ara. R,`aN�, rt,—n xprz I' Ira .0 rvlw[ a.1 . N Gage TU - PA20-1325 Q u C «�annorro coNsrmicrarr mores: a e 0 -- -- — ----- -- _ om].�r wB.]n,.�NBx]aaa.wm N12 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD pmx.".<B¢rw¢aB,mmo¢I - t,INYJIEwDaBBorwo¢ z 0 ; a� I . � mBn ,r ��r"-• .. � .X'4bt - .______ T US1]' ^' - Bn ---------- - o-msa<,.WwvWu�¢mtftGnuwMff¢wNu¢„w]FY% �= O I— pr ,- unnll lN[ y Fa� S IF � � By q - �I • 'I � `�h` � �' `n . o xn I 1 •rs ". na I •I' e a � - \' �� � I I � x Q :� ` � � �,-_ 04 rl I�41 FF-1;110.5 11 rix a �S PAD=1110.0 ;' g it II .BixBx '`�•_ rsal !� ,�� I - ��" — — — —� ��— — I / m - Is g1>s li°B, Is B xfB] I I m' —L]�Y ��I ss'-j [x BI......._.. d � �1•t rs� ml i � ' �� \ I tunr��a n�.•� CX I gl%_�_ I i � sE��rou o-0 01 �nI1 �I oa, 1. , , I B I ,I¢ I] ,�.,2r • . FF=1110.0 H nmB ID �� FF=1112.0 D! I PAD=1109.5 J �I `ilL� ¢^" w``) �r P PAD=1111.5 D I , IT Ic FF=1111.0 II =I a PAD=1110.5 B u -1 -` �� � - �����'`°r�•i I IE ` j Ir rig •� � —"�` I x ml ! L - `� a u�,,l� a um j W ........... wr ----........\ % O aSls �mm 8yYI8rt _ FF I J i on] B][ m r x.B BB�N ». n'or A PART T ♦sEYENTS AND OEDIO;TION NOTES 4y r _ _ wmrx,u nroa; ey uc¢ x1Iq o ;1- r-; wB n6/BB-BI IhC ww¢]; © 9 M a-/.tI u]4 PA20-1325 tl 0 nIPN E —ELLS ELL PLAN VIEW EXTERIOR LIGHT POLLUTION MUST COMPLY WITH ®FLIfSH RILL aox, rYP CGC SECTION 5.106.8 ALL LIGHT FIXTURES ARE DARK SKY COMPLIANT John Wasson Architects, Inc. 726 ChelhChclham Way Santa Barbara C A mA 93108 �N'l M°. (805)-969-7280 e+ags 4— «,°.»•.mxw. a,«<.,�wH.o A BOLLARD BASE DETAIL SCALE : NONE _ — �—�--JJ—�—❑—aJ , 1 l2; — —-—��°--- 12 DEL�ORATNE 7'� { '>' Y _ I,•I DECDRnrIVE _ O. eCO 16 BOLLARD LI6NT U 1 t Pni Copyright ��— 2l LIEI�i ttPlr LAL ( l tl „V l], �• 1", --A IJ TYPILAL NGE � / '' 13 S ��� � -� �• PE SITE LIGHTING PLAN SITE LIGHTING NORTH PLAN J= E1.1 .T � . ......... PARKING LOT Pd.E LIGNT DSAP SERIES LED DSAP SERIES -LED a. ....... . 0 TIT; In 10 oz 9-s A—P I 4- SS b -THE1- 'ITFTLE F L-1 . "I" IIIIE5- DSAP SERIES - LED =P- :c tz. ta - - �_._ = . - �.. — - - p r ------- - ---- 7. John Watson Architects, Inc. 726 Chelham Way Santa Barbara CA 9 3 1 0 8 (805)-969-7280 C,,.,Y LED ® PARKING LAHOPY LIGHT LED PARK HARBOR' me jl;llli,.�'TT Ti! �V- ROO- EMMUMMEMW e-- WE WALL--c R' —r— —T. FULL —OFF &q- WILL— • —1— HEIGHT, — —OFF u u P CA e BOLLARD LIGHT, ttPILAL Fo SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE CUT SHEETS LE3F"_ �e E1.3 GENERAL NO TES: 1. PARCEL OWNERS WILL RESERVE A RECIPROCAL EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, PARKING AND EMERGENCY ACCESS OVER THE COMMON AREAS WITHIN THIS TENTATIVE TRACT MAP. 2. EXISTING LAND USE: VACANT 3. PROPOSED LAND USE: MULTI -FAMILY 4. EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) 5 5. EXISTING ZONING: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO) 5 6. SURROUNDING ZONING: H, M & LM 7. METHOD OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: GRAVITY SEWER 8. THE ENTIRE TENTATIVE MAP AREA IS UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP 9. ALL EXISTING POWERPOLES AND ELECTRICAL VAULTS TO REMAIN 10. LAND IS NOT SUBJECT TO NATURAL FAULT LINES 11. LAND HAS A LOW PROBABILITY OF LIQUEFACTION, SEISMICALLY INDUCED SETTLEMENT AND LATERAL SPREADING 12. THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS TENTATIVE MAP LIES ENTIRELY WITHIN FLOOD ZONE "X", BEING DESCRIBED AS "MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD" PER FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP (FIRM) - COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 06065C2720G, DATED AUGUST 28, 20058 13. ALL PROPOSED INTERNAL STREET WIDTHS ARE 24" MINIMUM 14. ALL INTERNAL CURVE RADII ARE A MINIMUM OF 21' 15. PROJECT IS ONE PHASE PROPERTY /NFORMA T/ON.• OWNER/APPLICANT) SOILS ENGINEER: RENDEZVOUS MULTI -FAMILY LP ED ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS 7210 JORDAN AVE., #67 3146 TIGER RUN COURT, SUITE 118 CANOGA PARK, CA 91303 CARLSBAD, CA 92010 CONTACT: BART BUCHALTER CONTACT: MOHAMMED JOOLAZADEH, GE #2199 (818) 266-7871 (760) 431-3747 BART@MJWGROUP.COM REPORTS DATE: NOVEMBER 18, 2019 REPORT NO.: PWD-72988.4B ENGINEER: DRC ENGINEERING, INC 160 S OLD SPRINGS ROAD, SUITE 210 ANAHEIM HILLS, CA 92808 CONTACT: RENE VARGA (714) 685-6860 X337 (714) 685-6801 RVARGA@DRC-ENG.COM ARCHITECT: JOHN WATSON ARCHITECTS, INC. 726 CHELHAM WAY SANTA BARBARA, CA 93108 CONTACT: JOHN WATSON (805) 69-7280 MONTECITOARCHITECT@GMAIL.COM MAP PREPARA T/ON DA TE NOVEMBER 06, 2020 SCHOOL D/STR/CT TEMECULA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT 31350 RANCHO VISTA RD TEMECULA, CA 92592-6202 (951) 676-2661 DA TA TABLE /NFORMA TION ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBERS: 944-370-006, 944-370-005, 944-370-013, 944-370-001, 944-370-007, 944-370-012, 944-370-010, 944-370-008 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCEL 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 OF PARCEL MAP 31023, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 216, PAGES 80 & 81, IN THE CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXISTING & PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATION: PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OVERLAY (PDO-5) NUMBER OF LOTS: 1 NUMBER OF OPEN SPACE LOTS: 0 LOT SIZE: 22.82 ACRES GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: EXISTING: PO (A&B), MULTI -FAMILY (C) PROPOSED: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (M) EXISTING LAND USE/PROPOSED LAND USE: VACANT/MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL TOTAL GROSS AREA: 1,000,374 SF 22.97 ACRES TOTAL NET AREA: 994,091 SF 22.82 ACRES APPROXIMATE EARTHWORK QUANTITIES: 27,322 CY (CUT), 3,562 CY (FILL), 23,716 CY (NET EXPORT) NAME OF UTILITY PURVEYORS AND TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL: - SEWER EASTERN MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT 2270 TRUMBLE RD PERRIS, CA 92570 951-928-3777 - WATER RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER 41235 WINCHESTER RD TEMECULA, CA 92590 951-296-6900 - GAS SO CAL GAS COMPANY 1981 W LUGONIA REDLANDS, CA 92374 213-244-1200 - TELEPHONE FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS 9 S 4TH ST REDLANDS, CA 92373 855-295-7926 - ELECTRIC SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON 24487 PRIELIPP DR WILDOMAR, CA 92595 951-249-8301 - CABLE SPECTRUM 7337 CENTRAL AVE RIVERSIDE, CA 92504 833-267-6097 OWNER'S STA TEMENT WE HEREBY STATE WE ARE THE OWNERS OF THE LAND INCLUDED WITHIN THE SUBDIVISION SHOWN HEREON; THAT WE ARE THE ONLY PERSONS WHOSE CONSENT IS NECESSARY TO PASS A A CLEAR TITLE TO SAID LAND: THAT WE CONSENT TO THE MAKING AND RECORDING OF THIS SUBDIVISION MAP AS SHOWN WITHIN THE DISTINCTIVE BORDER LINE. BASIS OF BEARING THE BASIS OF BEARING FOR THIS MAP IS THE CENTERLINE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD (FORMERLY LONG VALLEY ROAD) BEING NORTH 81'16'06" EAST PER TRACT 12189-1, RECORDED IN MAP BOOK 134, PAGES 91 THROUGH 93, INCLUSIVE RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA EA SEMEN NO TES: OA AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY AND CALIFORNIA WATER AND TELEPHONE COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 40992, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1966 - TO REMAIN O EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES, PARCEL MAP 31023, PARCELS 1-8, PMB 216/80-81 - TO BE VACATED O EASEMENT RETAINED FOR PRIVATE USE FOR THE SOLE BENEFIT OF LOT OWNERS, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNEES FOR THE RECIPROCAL DRAINAGE AND RECIPROCAL INGRESS AND EGRESS, PER PARCEL MAP 31023, PARCELS 1-8, PMB 216/80-1 - TO BE VACATED Op EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL LOOP DETECTORS, PER PARCEL MAP 31023, PARCELS 1-8, PMB 216/80-81 - TO REMAIN OE EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR WATER AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0286945, RECORDED APRIL 12, 2005 - TO BE VACATED O EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT FOR PIPELINES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0235421, RECORDED JUNE 5, 2019 - TO REMAIN O EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0091906, RECORDED FEBRUARY 07, 2007 - TO REMAIN OH EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2007-0767317, RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 2007 - TO BE VACATED O EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER INSTRUMENT NO. 2019-0380030, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 25, 2019 - TO REMAIN O EASEMENT DEDICATED TO THE CITY OF TEMECULA FOR PRIVATE DRIVEWAY AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, PER PARCEL MAP 31023, PARCELS 1-8, PMB 216/80-81 - TO REMAIN ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF INGRESS AND EGRESS TO OR FROM RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, PER PARCEL MAP 31023 OF BOOK 216, PAGES 80 & 81 - TO REMAIN CITY OF TEMECULA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT VIA P NO 3843 BEND A SUBDIVISION OF PARCELS 1, 59 69 7 AND 8 OF PARCEL MAP 31023 AS PER MAP N BOOK 261, PAGES 80 AND 81 OF PARCEL MAPS, TOGETHER WITH PARCEL "A, B 8c C" OF LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT N0. PA06-0264, RECORDED MARCH 28, 2007 AS INSTRUMENT N0. 2007-0208998 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, BOTH RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY. RANCHO CA L IFORN/A ROAD N81'16'06"E 0 0 LO G LO LO LO LO LO - - - - - N81 °16'06"E 106.91'� `D L22 L24 N81 °16'06"E 239.30' - - I /%/T/ C1 L15��C2 L16 N81 °16'06"E 154.55' ��� L1 L23 /??/7 I J� I /T7ii'77TT/T/T/7177Ti l>> L19 L20 %%? I J I IJ L18 I 15.0' y 15.0' E F 10.0' I E D 0 a; ICD40.5111 I (311 F I(6 I ICI II cc.)IZ A P G r 40.5' CD o' I I �� P B cl.� Noy C14 CO Of 0 t00 oIZIIkZ I o z I C6 iJ JI , B G I I ®I C7-- L28 L25 N81'16 37 E 174.92 N81 °637E 12.8 , J N81°17'19"E 117.43' C8- - - - - - - L L3 6 4 b L26 4&116'-3u.u----------- o6 C3 C14 N8116'_7'1�22.04'� L29 17 L8 � o N o C� rn J L7 _ Iy I �% P 1II �I! �� I; 00 �J 00 - I' z C)}4 , _ - --�-- - L11 , L L12 , i N81°16'06"E 146.15'L27 N81 07 38 E 164.16 14 I I �L4 '�N OF) / Q/ H I I \`�\�I HCD 14 NJ oo r // //� / / _� I I I ��, ,\ I L2 N81 °07'38"E 335.63' / 1 i H --- 7%- -�--- I H '1 4" '" � I I / �� z Lp / / A 10.0' I // 160, 60, _-__-_-____ - --- _ ------ __7 - - -------- / V J 15.22 AC I I N L i / / I ___----------------------------------� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L-- - - - - - - - - - - - - -N 79!+3 +2&0.30- 23 I 22 I 26 / I 39 37 36 27 I I 100 / 43 III 41 I 4u I I I \ I ®® I .I -- 0 O z I I I EXISTING ZONI \ °" \ ' Q LEVANDE PL - 50 °' T 60' 0' 60' 120' 180' GRAPHIC SCALE: 1 "=60' 66.0' 33.0' 33.0' 1\ SHEET INDEX: LOTS & EASEMENTS 1 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT & SECTIONS 2 Line Table Line # Length Direction L1 55.06' N81°16'05.64"E L2 45.54' N81'07'38.40"E L3 52.08' N47'03'42.62"W L4 11.65' N8'42'40.69"W L5 29.78' N38'21'12.35"W L6 75.55' N19'10'16.80"W L7 13.88' N81'17'19.31"E L8 23.59' N81 *17'19.31 "E L9 33.99' N1'54'39.00"E L10 27.38' N8'55'40.00"W L11 61.30' N72'51'00.40"E L12 50.99' N77'50'22.00"E L13 56.42' N85'20'54.00"E L14 39.98' N81'15'16.00"E L15 31.05' N89'17'01.91 "W L16 39.71' N81'16'05.64"E L17 32.80' N53'42'50.00"W L18 40.50' N81'18'14.38"E L19 10.45' N8'20'20.27"W L20 40.50' N81 °18'14.36"E L21 32.25' N36'17'10.00"E L22 26.13' N76°13'54.36"W L23 62.51' N81'16'05.64"E L24 26.13' N58'46'05.64"E L25 14.00' N8'43'33.65"W L26 56.40' N81'16'37.01 "E L27 39.64' N81'16'05.64"E L28 5.11' N81'16'37.01 "E L29 4.58' N8'42'40.69"W L30 27.20' N1'23'54.71"W L31 18.11' N1'23'54.71"W L32 26.77' N71'24'37.26"E L33 33.73' N71'54'18.00"E Curve Table Curve # Length Radius Delta C1 27.83' 168.75' 9.45' C2 31.78' 192.75' 9.45' C3 42.92' 150.00' 16.40' C4 9.90' 100.00' 5.67' C5 12.76' 100.00' 7.31' C6 12.11' 100.00' 6.94' C7 35.94' 100.00' 20.59' C8 25.83' 150.00' 9.87' EX. BOUNDARY -- PROP. BOUNDARY -- EX. LOT LINE - - EASEMENT - RETAINING WAL FIRE HYDRANT AC ACRES BLDG BUILDING DU DWELLING UNITS ESMT EASEMENT EX. EXISTING EV# FUTURE ELECTRIC VEHICLE STALL & NUMBER COUNT FF FINISH FLOOR FH FIRE HYDRANT LM LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL PA PROPERTY LINE PR. PROPOSED R/W RIGHT -A -WAY SCE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON SD STORM DRAIN TR TRACT 1. SEE CONCEPTUAL UTILITY PLANS FOR THE PROJECT'S PROPOSED STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS 2. SEE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLANS FOR THE PROJECT'S PROPOSED GRADING DESIGNS . • r I 4il I IAy/GIz/.". C mWW/j I/. 1 A'//' �. I Ill I /. u^ pp� • ,i% lip � a e N d\�`�1PUMA lip ��11� -31 /%/ 601rLSI INN _'mill C�r WO IWI-M SEA � :::_II��E� *�MW ii1� .. �� � \� `Ilr r• I�I�� � 'n� II �II��=� k ,� I�� SD �1►1�i:: uN A -A OJI'//l UI V E THAGT MAP 3t304 EXHIBIT "A" OJAW ff: 001 ADVISORS IN: REAL ESTATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BERKELEY A.JERRY KEYSER TIMOTHYC. KELLY DEBBIE M. KERN DAVID DOEZEMA KEVIN FEENEY Los ANGELES KATHLEEN H. HEAD JAM Ls A. RAPE GREGORY D. SOOT Ioo KEVIN F. ENGSTROM JULIE L. ROMEY Tim BRETZ SAN DIEGO PAUL C. MARRA > IL-2fl. KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES. ADVISORS IN PUBLIC/PRIVATE REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT MEMORANDUM To: Scott Cooper, Associate Planner II City of Temecula From: KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. Date: June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous —Final Fiscal Impact Analysis INTRODUCTION A. Objective In accordance with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc.'s (KMA's) agreement for consulting services with the City of Temecula (City), KMA has undertaken a Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for the Rendezvous project (Project) proposed by Rendezvous Multi -Family LP (Applicant). The Project is planned to include 134 rental apartment units. The Project will be located at the southwest quadrant of Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive (Project Site). The Project Site is located in a Planned Development Overlay with an underlying land use of Professional Office (PO). The Applicant is proposing a General Plan Amendment to develop Medium Density Residential (M). This FIA prepared by KMA evaluated the recurring General Fund revenues and expenditures generated by the proposed Project over a 20-year period. The 20-year period begins at the completion and occupancy of the Project's first residential units, which is assumed to be Fiscal Year (FY) 2024. B. Methodology In completing this assignment, KMA undertook the following principal work tasks: • Reviewed background materials and planning/zoning documents relevant to the Project and the Site. 555 W. BEECH STREET, SUITE 460 , SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 r PHONE: 619 718 9500 , FAX: 619 718 9508 22059kal W W W. KEYS E RMARSTO N. COM 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis June 9, 2022 Page 2 • Reviewed the City's FY 2021 General Fund Operating Budget to understand the City's fiscal condition and revenue/expenditure parameters. • Interviewed key City staff regarding cost -of -service structure and approach to provide services to the Project. • Collected and reviewed demographic and economic trends for the Temecula area. • Collected and reviewed residential market data to substantiate inputs provided by the Applicant. • Responded to follow-up comments and additional market data provided by the Applicant. • Estimated recurring annual revenues and municipal service expenditures as a result of the Project. C. Report Organization Following this introduction: • Section II presents a summary of the KMA key findings. • Section III provides a projection of the fiscal impact of the Project on the City's General Fund over the 20-year period. • Finally, Section IV presents limiting conditions pertaining to this report. II. KEY FINDINGS A. Project — 20-Year Fiscal Impact • The Project is estimated to yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City's General Fund, each year, over the projected 20-year period. • The major revenue categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include indirect (off -site) sales tax, Measure S revenues, property tax, property tax in -lieu of vehicle license fee (VLF), and franchise fees. • The major expenditure categories generated by the Project during this 20-year period include Police, Fire, Public Works, Community Development, and Community Development. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 3 • The Project's fiscal impact is estimated at negative $6,000, or negative $44 per unit, in stabilized Year 1 (FY 2024 dollars) and is projected to reach negative $124,000, or negative $928 per unit, in Year 20 (FY 2043 dollars), as shown in Table II-1 below. ImpactTable 11-1: Fiscal FY 2024 FY 2043 General Fund Revenues $164,000 $260,000 General Fund Expenditures 170 000 384 000 Annual Net Fiscal Impact to City ($6,000) ($124,000) Deficit per Unit per Year ($44) ($928) Revenue to Expense Ratio 0.96 0.68 III. 20-YEAR FISCAL IMPACT OF PROJECT A. Overview of Methodology This section presents the KMA methodology used to estimate the fiscal impact on the City's General Fund resulting from the development of the proposed Project. The detailed KMA 20-year fiscal impact model is provided in Appendices A and B of this report and summarized below. Demographic and Economic Overview Table III-1 presents the findings of the KMA review of demographic and economic factors for the City. The data consist of population, number of housing units, and total jobs. More detail is presented in Appendix A, Table A-1. Table 111-1: Demographic Overview, City of Temecula 2020 Estimate Population 111,970 Housing Units 36,550 Jobs 54,313 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 4 Overview of City General Fund Budget Table III-2 below provides an overview of the City's FY 2021 Revised General Fund budget. A more detailed analysis can be found in Appendix A, Table A-2. As shown, the City was operating at a net surplus of $218,000 in FY 2021. General Fund Revenues $79,536,000 General Fund Expenditures ($79,318,000) Net Surplus/(Deficit) $218,000 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.00 Appendix A, Tables A-3 and A-4 also show the department revenues and expenditures used to calculate the per capita impacts to the General Fund from the development of the proposed Project. The revenues shown are strictly departmental revenues and exclude such revenues as property and sales tax, which are estimated based on projected increases in assessed value and taxable sales as a result of development of the Project, respectively. The expenditures used in this analysis reflect a deduction for citizen/user payments in the form of Charges for Services to yield net (unreimbursed) expenditures. B. Key Assumptions — Project As shown in Table III-3 below, the Project will include 134 rental apartment units. A more detailed description of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-2. Site Area Apartments — Rental Density 7.60 Net Acres 134 Units 18 Units/Net Acre Table III-4 presents the assumed absorption schedule for the Project. It is anticipated that for each product type, the first occupancy and stabilized occupancy will occur by FY 2024. A more detailed analysis of the projected annual absorption of the Project can be found in Appendix B, Table B-3. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis June 9, 2022 Page 5 FY 2024 FY 2025 Total Apartments — Rental 134 0 134 (1) Assumes construction begins 7/1/22 with an opening date of 1/1/24. C. Key Assumptions to Fiscal Impact Projection General Approach Assumptions used in the FIA are based on an assessment of future circumstances regarding population, employment, property valuation, and taxable sales. Table III-5 below provides a summary of the key assumptions used in this analysis. Population 2.00 Persons per Unit Resident Equivalents 0.33 Employees per Resident Residential Value $350,000 Per Unit (FY 2021) (1) (1) KMA estimate. Based on review of recent multi -family residential building sales in Temecula and North San Diego County. The FIA also estimates other General Fund revenues and expenditures based on a modified per capita measure known as "resident equivalents." The approach combines residents and employees to form a single service population. As summarized below, the resident equivalent approach weighs an employee as 0.33 residents, such that three employees are viewed as having the same impact as one resident. Table 111-6: Total Resident Equivalents Total Total Total Total Resident Population Employment Population Equivalents (1) + Jobs City of Temecula 111,970 54,313 166,283 129,893 Rendezvous Project 255 0 255 255 (1) Assumes a resident equivalent factor of 0.33 (three employees have approximately the same impact as one resident). 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis General Fund Revenues June 9, 2022 Page 6 This section discusses the recurring General Fund revenue assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the proposed Project. Annual recurring revenues generated by the Project, such as Property Tax and Sales and Use Tax, were estimated based on assumed real estate market factors such as market values/rents for the residential units. One-time revenues, such as Development Impact Fees and building permits used to offset one-time City costs, were not evaluated in this FIA. To reflect pre-COVID-19 pandemic operating levels, Franchise Fees; Licenses and Permits; Fines and Forfeitures; and other revenues were estimated by using a three (3)-year historical average of actual revenue received from FY 2018 to FY 2020. The historical average figure was then divided by the applicable service population to estimate a per capita or "per resident equivalent" factor. This factor was then applied to the number of new residents anticipated for the Project. As shown in Table III-7 below, KMA applied the following escalation factors to estimate the annual General Fund revenues to the City over a 20-year period. The annual escalation factors were based on KMA's review of recent historical valuation trends in the City, as well as discussions with the City's Finance Department. Table 111-7: Annual Revenue Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Assessed Value (1) Pre -Build -out 5.0% Post -Build -out 2.0% Sales Tax 3.0% Measure S (2) 3.0% Special Tax (Measure C) (3) 0.0% Franchise Fees 1.5% Other General Fund Revenues 2.5% (1) Reflects assumed market escalation. (2) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (3) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. General Fund Expenditures This section discusses the recurring annual General Fund expenditure assumptions utilized to estimate the impact of the Project at build -out. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis June 9, 2022 Page 7 Annual recurring expenditures, including Fire, Public Works, and City Council, were estimated by applying a per capita or "per resident equivalent" cost estimate to the number of new residents anticipated from build -out of the Project, with the exception of Police. To estimate Police expenditures, KMA applied the Project's pro rata share of one (1) new police officer, at an approximate annual cost of $352,000, per 1,000 population added to the City. The City's Asset Management Fund, a direct interfund transfer from the Measure S Fund into four (4) separate Asset Management Funds (Street Replacement Fund, Vehicles/Equipment Fleet Replacement Fund, Facilities Replacement Fund, and Technology Replacement Fund), was also included in addition to the General Fund expenditure analysis. Annual escalation factors for each major expenditure category were estimated by KMA based on five- year financial projections for the General Fund presented in the City's Budget. As shown in Table III-8, General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase at escalation rates ranging between 2.0% and 5.0% per year. KMA also applied a marginal cost adjustment to each expenditure category to reflect that General Fund expenditures do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between projected population growth and demand for municipal services, such as overhead and administrative functions within City government. As shown in Table III-8, the marginal cost adjustments assumed by KMA ranged between 0% (no adjustment to per capita assumptions) to 100% (expenditures not impacted by the Project). 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis June 9, 2022 Page 8 Table 111-8: Annual Expenditure Escalation Factors Escalation Factor Marginal Cost Impact Adjustment (1) Police 5.00% 5.0% Public Works — Land Development, Public Works, etc. 2.50% 10.0% Fire 5.00% 5.0% Public Works — Parks & Maintenance 2.50% 10.0% Community Development 2.75% 20.0% Finance 2.75% 30.0% City Clerk 3.00% 30.0% Retiree Medical Contribution 3.00% 90.0% City Attorney 2.00% 40.0% City Council 2.75% 40.0% Community Support 2.00% 80.0% PERS Replacement Benefit 3.00% 100.0% Property Tax Administration 2.00% 30.0% Asset Management Fund 2.50% 0.0% General Government 2.50% 40.0% (1) Reflects adjustment to expenditure categories that do not typically have a 1:1 relationship between population growth and demand for municipal services. For example, an increase in population will demand 95% of Police municipal services expenditures per net new resident equivalent. D. Annual Fiscal Impact to General Fund General Fund Revenues Table III-9 summarizes the KMA estimate of recurring General Fund revenues during the Project's build - out year (FY 2024). As shown, Sales Tax and Measure S revenues, in the form of off -site resident spending captured within the City, represent the largest components of General Fund revenues as a result of the Project. The Project's 255 new residents are expected to generate $80,200 of net new revenues (in the form of Sales Tax/Measure S revenues) to the City in FY 2024. This represents about 48.8% of total revenues generated by the Project. Property Tax and Property Tax In -Lieu of Vehicle License Fee (VLF) revenues are the next largest source of General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project's 134 residential units. In FY 2024, the Project is projected to generate approximately $27,000 in Property Tax and $30,600 in Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF revenues. In combination, these sources represent 35.1% of the total General Fund revenues to be generated by the Project. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 9 The other sources, including Franchise Fees, Property Transfer Tax, Measure C, Franchise Fees, and all other revenue sources, are anticipated to account for the remaining 16.1% of General Fund revenues generated by the Project. 2024Table 111-9: General Fund Revenues in FY Total % of Total Property Tax $27,000 16.4% Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF $30,600 18.6% Property Transfer Tax $3,000 1.8% Sales Tax — Resident Spending $41,600 25.3% Measure S — Resident Spending (1) $38,600 23.5% Measure C (2) $7,500 4.6% Franchise Fees $7,700 4.7% Business Licenses $600 0.4% Fines and Forfeitures $1,500 0.9% Vehicle License Fees $200 0.1% Operating Transfers In — Gas Tax/SLESF $5,400 3.3% Miscellaneous Revenue 500 0.3% Total Revenues (Rounded) $164,000 100.0% (1) Measure S is an additional 1.0% sales tax utilized to fund general City services. (2) Measure C authorized the Temecula Community Services District (TCSD) to assess and collect the Parks and Lighting Special Tax. All property owners pay this tax. General Fund Expenditures As shown in Table III-10, the total annual General Fund expenditures to provide services to the Project are estimated at $170,000 in FY 2024. Major expenditure categories were estimated based on projections from current service levels. As shown, the Project's pro rats cost for Police represents the largest of the Project -generated expenditures at $98,800, or 58.2% of total expenditures. Fire services represent the second largest expenditure at $20,800, or 12.2% of the total Project - generated expenditures. The remaining departmental expenditures, including, but not limited to, Public Works, Asset Management Fund, and General Government, account for a combined $50,300, or 29.6% of total expenditures. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Table 111-10: General Fund Expenditures in FY 2024 of Total Total Police $98,800 58.2% City Council $800 0.5% Community Support $100 0.1% General Government $6,200 3.6% City Clerk $2,000 1.2% City Attorney $1,200 0.7% Finance $4,500 2.6% Community Development $6,700 3.9% Public Works — Land Development, etc. $13,400 7.9% Public Works — Park Maintenance $8,800 5.2% Fire (1) $20,800 12.2% Property Tax Administration $100 0.1% Retiree Medical Contribution $200 0.1% PERS Replacement Benefit $0 0.0% Asset Management Fund $6,300 3.7% Total Expenditures (Rounded) $170,000 100.0% (1) Expenditures are net of the County Structure Fire Protection Tax. Annual Fiscal Impact June 9, 2022 Page 10 Comparison of the annual revenues and annual expenditures generated by the Project indicates that it will yield a negative net fiscal impact to the City's General Fund each year over the 20-year period. As shown in Table III-11, the Project's net fiscal impact is estimated at negative $6,000, or negative $44 per unit, at build -out in Year 1 (FY 2024). The Project's net fiscal impact reaches negative $124,000, or negative $928 per unit, by Year 20 (FY 2043). A more detailed analysis is presented in Appendix B. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Subject: Rendezvous - Final Fiscal Impact Analysis June 9, 2022 Page 11 111-11: Annual General General ImpactTable Fund Revenues to General Fund Recurring Per Unit Per Fiscal Fund Expenditures Expenditures Surplus/(Deficit) Year (2) Year Revenues (1) Ratio 2024 $164,000 $170,000 ($6,000) ($44) 0.96 2025 $168,000 $177,000 ($9,000) ($69) 0.95 2026 $172,000 $185,000 ($13,000) ($96) 0.93 2027 $176,000 $193,000 ($17,000) ($124) 0.91 2028 $180,000 $201,000 ($21,000) ($154) 0.90 2029 $185,000 $210,000 ($25,000) ($187) 0.88 2030 $189,000 $219,000 ($30,000) ($221) 0.86 2031 $194,000 $229,000 ($35,000) ($258) 0.85 2032 $199,000 $238,000 ($39,000) ($297) 0.84 2033 $204,000 $249,000 ($45,000) ($338) 0.82 2034 $208,000 $260,000 ($52,000) ($383) 0.80 2035 $214,000 $271,000 ($57,000) ($430) 0.79 2036 $219,000 $283,000 ($64,000) ($480) 0.77 2037 $224,000 $296,000 ($72,000) ($533) 0.76 2038 $230,000 $309,000 ($79,000) ($590) 0.74 2039 $235,000 $322,000 ($87,000) ($649) 0.73 2040 $241,000 $337,000 ($96,000) ($712) 0.72 2041 $247,000 $352,000 ($105,000) ($780) 0.70 2042 $253,000 $367,000 ($114,000) ($852) 0.69 2043 $260,000 $384,000 ($124,000) ($928) 0.68 (1) Includes Project -generated Measure S revenues. (2) Represents annual General Fund impact per unit based on anticipated annual absorption for the Project. Full build -out of the Project occurs in FY 2024. IV. LIMITING CONDITONS 1. The KMA analysis is based, in part, on data provided by secondary sources, such as state and local governments, planning agencies, real estate brokers, and other third parties. While KMA believes that these sources are reliable, we cannot guarantee their accuracy. 2. A projection of economic impacts is inherently based on judgment. While KMA considers these projections reasonable for planning purposes, it is the nature of forecasting that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes may be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, may require review or revision of this report. 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 12 3. The projections of future economic impact do not consider the potential adverse impacts of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and national recession that is likely to follow. 4. The accompanying projections and analyses are based on estimates and assumptions which were developed using currently available economic data, Project -specific data, and other relevant information. It is the nature of forecasting, however, that some assumptions may not materialize, and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Such changes are likely to be material to the projections and conclusions herein and, if they occur, require review or revision of this document. 5. Any estimates of revenue or cost projections are based on the best Project -specific and fiscal data available at this time as well as experience with comparable projects. They are not intended to be projections of actual future performance of any specific project. 6. Revenue estimates are based on the assumption that sufficient market support exists for the proposed uses and that the Project will achieve industry standard productivity levels. 7. KMA assumes that all applicable laws and governmental regulations in place as of the date of this document will remain unchanged throughout the projection period of our analysis. In the event that this does not hold true, i.e., if any tax rates change, the analysis would need to be revised. 8. Value estimates assume that any necessary entitlements or zoning changes for development can be obtained in a reasonable time frame. 9. Value estimates assume that property titles are good and marketable; no title search has been made, nor has KMA attempted to determine property ownership. The value estimates are given without regard to any questions of boundaries, encumbrances, liens, or encroachments. 10. Property tax projections reflect KMA's understanding of the assessment and tax apportionment procedures employed by the County. The County procedures are subject to change as a reflection of policy revisions or legislative mandate. While we believe our estimates to be reasonable, taxable values resulting from actual appraisals may vary from the amounts assumed in the projections. 11. No assurances are provided by KMA as to the certainty of the projected tax revenues shown in this document. Actual revenues may be higher or lower than what has been projected and are subject to valuation changes resulting from new developments or transfers of ownership not specifically 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 To: Scott Cooper, City of Temecula June 9, 2022 Subject: Rendezvous — Final Fiscal Impact Analysis Page 13 identified herein, actual resolution of outstanding appeals, future filing of appeals, or the non- payment of taxes due. 12. KMA is not advising or recommending any action be taken by the City with respect to any prospective, new, or existing municipal financial products or issuance of municipal securities (including with respect to the structure, timing, terms, and other similar matters concerning such financial products or issues). 13. KMA is not acting as a municipal advisor to the City and does not assume any fiduciary duty hereunder, including, without limitation, a fiduciary duty to the City pursuant to Section 15B of the Exchange Act with respect to the services provided hereunder and any information and material contained in KMA's work product. 14. The City shall discuss any such information and material contained in KMA's work product with any and all internal and/or external advisors and experts, including its own municipal advisors, that it deems appropriate before acting on the information and material. attachments 22059 ka I 19454.051.001 APPENDIX A FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS RENDEZVOUS Demographic Profile and City of Temecula General Fund Budget DEMOGRAPHICS TABLE A-1 DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE - CITY OF TEMECULA, 2020 ESTIMATES (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 2020 Estimates I. Population Population 111,970 Average Household Size 3.24 Jobs (2) 54,313 II. Housing Units Single -Family 30,001 82.1% Multi -Family 6,387 17.5% Mobile Homes 162 0.4% Total 36,550 100.0% III. Occupied Units 34,511 IV. Percent Vacant 5.6% (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin -Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 14 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TABLE A-2 SUMMARY OF CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL FUND BUDGET - FY 2021 OPERATING BUDGET RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Revised Budget I. Revenues Property Tax $9,226,610 Sales and Use Tax $36,177,000 (Less) Sales Tax Sharing Agreement ($1,245,053) Franchise Fees $3,562,656 Transient Occupancy Tax $2,620,575 Special Tax (Measure C) $1,880,264 Licenses, Permits, and Service Charges $4,539,248 Fines and Forfeitures $419,774 Use of Money and Property $30,389 Intergovernmental Revenues $8,857,073 Reimbursements $3,033,843 Miscellaneous $187,702 Subtotal - Revenues $69,290,081 Add: Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF/CARES Act $4,301,409 Add: Operating Transfers In - Measure S $5,944,780 Total Revenues $79,536,270 II. Expenditures City Council $592,662 Community Support $125,000 City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Emergency Management $421,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 Finance $2,600,964 Human Resources $1,160,678 Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 CIP Admin $2,389,172 Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 Police $35,990,469 Fire $10,406, 302 Animal Control $450,177 Non -Departmental $1,193,629 Total Expenditures $79,317,557 III. Total Surplus/(Deficit) $218,713 Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1.00 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 15 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TABLE A-3 SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I. Revenues- Included in Analysis A. Taxes and Franchises Property Tax Sales Tax (t) Franchise Fees Special Tax (Measure C) Subtotal -Taxes and Franchises B. Business Licenses C. Fines and Forfeitures D. Intergovernmental Revenues Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Vehicle License Fees Subtotal - Intergovernmental Revenues E. Operating Transfers In -Gas Tax General Fund Revenues FY 2021 Revised Budget Comments $9,226,610 projected based on increase in gross assessed value $34,931,947 projected based on taxable sales generated by incremental development $3,562,656 projected based on population $1,880,264 based on residential units and commercial acreage developed $49,601,477 $255,000 projected based on population and employment $419,774 projected based on population and employment $8,801,658 projected based on increase in gross assessed value 55 415 projected based on population $8,857,073 $2,639,716 projected based on population F. Miscellaneous $34,617 projected based on population and employment - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Revenues - Included in Analysis $61,807,657 s----------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- II. Revenues - Excluded from Analysis A. Transient Occupancy Tax B. Reimbursements Capital Improvement Program PechangalGA Other Reimbursements Subtotal - Reimbursements C. Development Impact Fees D. Use of Money and Property Lease/Rental Income Investment Interest Other Subtotal - Use of Money and Property $2,620,575 hotel use not planned as part of Project $2,435,827 independent of projected incremental development $356,567 independent of projected incremental development 333 449 independent of projected incremental development $3,125,843 $18,000 independent of projected incremental development $148,089 independent of projected incremental development ($117,700) independent of projected incremental development 4 941 $35,330 E. Operating Transfers In Measure S Fund $5,944,780 independent of incremental development COPS $279,185 independent of incremental development Fire Station 73 Repayment $0 independent of incremental development CARES Act (State) $1,382,508 independent of incremental development Subtotal - Operating Transfers In $7,606,473 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Total Revenues _Excluded from Analysis ------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $13,406,221 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------- III. Charges for Services A. Deducted from Community Development Building $1,671,009 Development Fees $159,780 Planning $542,722 Total Deducted from Community Development $2,373,511 B. Deducted from Public Works Land Development $1,006,805 Public Works $4,750 Parks Maintenance $1,000 Total Deducted from Public Works $1,012,555 C. Deducted from Police $149,557 D. Deducted from Fire $786,769 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total Charges for Services $4,322,392 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IV. Total General Fund Revenues $79,536,270 (1) Includes Sales Tax Sharing Agreement. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 16 GENERAL FUND BUDGET TABLE A-4 SUMMARY OF GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA General Fund Net After Expenditures Deduction of FY 2021 Charges for Services Revised Budget (Table A-3) I. Expenditures Included in Analysis City Council $592,662 $0 $592,662 Community Support $125,000 $0 $125,000 General Government City Manager $1,631,333 Economic Development $1,672,989 Human Resources $1,160,678 Emergency Management $421,310 Subtotal General Government $4,886,310 $0 $4,886,310 City Clerk $1,311,452 $0 $1,311,452 City Attorney $961,146 $0 $961,146 Finance Finance $2,600,964 Animal Control $450,177 Subtotal Finance $3,051,141 $0 $3,051,141 Community Development Planning $3,027,220 Building & Safety $3,299,788 Subtotal Community Development $6,327,008 ($2,373,511) $3,953,497 Public Works Land Development $1,806,405 Public Works $6,268,854 Subtotal Public Works $8,075,259 ($1,011,555) $7,063,704 Public Works Parks Maintenance $4,008,007 ($1,000) $4,007,007 Fire $10,406,302 ($786,769) $9,619,533 Non -Departmental Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 Property Tax Administration $94,195 Subtotal Non -Departmental $1,193,629 $0 $1,193,629 Add: Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 $0 $3,000,000 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures - Included in Analysis ---------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $43,937,916 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $39,765,081 II. Expenditures -Excluded from Analysis Police (1) $35,990,469 ($149,557) $35,840,912 CIP Administration $2,389,172 $0 $2,389,172 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Expenditures - Excluded from Analysis - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $38,379,641 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - $38,230,084 III. Total General Fund Expenditures $82,317,557 $77,995,165 (1) Per City; police expenditures included in analysis reflect project pro rata share of one new police officer per 1,000 population. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 17 APPENDIX B FISCAL IMPACT ANALYSIS RENDEZVOUS 20-Year Projection TABLE B-1 SUMMARY OF ANNUAL GENERAL FUND IMPACT GENERATED BY PROJECT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Fiscal Year General Fund Revenues General Fund Expenditures Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) Per Unit Absorbed to Date Revenues to Expenditures Ratio 1 2024 $164,000 $170,000 ($6,000) ($44) 0.96 2 2025 $168,000 $177,000 ($9,000) ($69) 0.95 3 2026 $172,000 $185,000 ($13,000) ($96) 0.93 4 2027 $176,000 $193,000 ($17,000) ($124) 0.91 5 2028 $180,000 $201,000 ($21,000) ($154) 0.90 6 2029 $185,000 $210,000 ($25,000) ($187) 0.88 7 2030 $189,000 $219,000 ($30,000) ($221) 0.86 8 2031 $194,000 $229,000 ($35,000) ($258) 0.85 9 2032 $199,000 $238,000 ($39,000) ($297) 0.84 10 2033 $204,000 $249,000 ($45,000) ($338) 0.82 11 2034 $208,000 $260,000 ($52,000) ($383) 0.80 12 2035 $214,000 $271,000 ($57,000) ($430) 0.79 13 2036 $219,000 $283,000 ($64,000) ($480) 0.77 14 2037 $224,000 $296,000 ($72,000) ($533) 0.76 15 2038 $230,000 $309,000 ($79,000) ($590) 0.74 16 2039 $235,000 $322,000 ($87,000) ($649) 0.73 17 2040 $241,000 $337,000 ($96,000) ($712) 0.72 18 2041 $247,000 $352,000 ($105,000) ($780) 0.70 19 2042 $253,000 $367,000 ($114,000) ($852) 0.69 20 2043 $260,000 $384,000 ($124,000) ($928) 0.68 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula-Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 18 TABLE B-2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I. Site Area II. Density III. Unit Mix Apartments IV. Parking Type Spaces Parking Ratio 7.60 Net Acres 18 Units/Net Acre 134 Units Garages/Carports 288 Spaces 2.15 Spaces/Unit Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 19 TABLE B-3 ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL ABSORPTION (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total at 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Build -out FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental 134 Units 134 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Cumulative ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 II. Total Cumulative Units 134 Units 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 134 (1) Assumes construction begins 7/1/22 with an opening date of 1/1/24. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 20 TABLE B-4 ESTIMATE OF TOTAL POPULATION RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Dwelling Vacancy Total Resident I. Residential Units Factor (1) Persons/Unit (2) Population Apartments 134 Units 5.0% 2.00 255 Total Population 255 (1) KMA assumption reflecting average vacancy rate, based on typical lender underwriting criteria for residential uses. (2) KMA assumption based on industry standard household size by unit type. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 21 TABLE B-5 POPULATION ESTIMATES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total at Vacancy Persons 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 Build -out Factor Per Unit FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments -Rental 134 Units 5.0% 2.00 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II. Total Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 22 TABLE B-5 POPULATION ESTIMATES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total at Vacancy Persons 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Build -out Factor Per Unit FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments -Rental 134 Units 5.0% 2.00 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II. Total Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 23 TABLE B-6 ESTIMATE OF ASSESSED VALUE (i) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I. Residential Apartments - Rental FY 2021 Dwelling Assessed Value Units Per Unit 134 Units $350,000 (1) Based on a review of sales of multi -family buildings apartment buildings in the City. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 24 TABLE B-7 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental $54,293,000 $55,378,000 $56,486,000 $57,616,000 $58,768,000 $59,943,000 $61,142,000 $62,365,000 $63,612,000 $64,885,000 II. Total Assessed Value $54,293,000 $55,378,000 $56,486,000 $57,616,000 $58,768,000 $59,943,000 $61,142,000 $62,365,000 $63,612,000 $64,885,000 (1) Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build -out and 2.0% per year after Project build -out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 25 TABLE B-7 ANNUAL ASSESSED VALUE (1) RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments - Rental $66,182,000 $67,506,000 $68,856,000 $70,233,000 $71,638,000 $73,071,000 $74,532,000 $76,023,000 $77,543,000 $79,094,000 II. Total Assessed Value $66,182,000 $67,506,000 $68,856,000 $70,233,000 $71,638,000 $73,071,000 $74,532,000 $76,023,000 $77,543,000 $79,094,000 (1) Assumes an escalation rate of 5.0% per year prior to Project build -out and 2.0% per year after Project build -out. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 26 TABLE B-8 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES -PROPERTY TAXES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I---------------------------------------------- Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97%; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 II. Total Property Tax Revenues $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 27 TABLE B-8 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES -PROPERTY TAXES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I---------------------------------------------- Property Tax Levy 1.0% City Portion 4.97% 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments - Rental $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 II. Total Property Tax Revenues $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 28 TABLE B-9 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN -LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA ---------------------------------------------• ;Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth ----------------------------------------------= 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments -Rental $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 II. Total Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Revenues $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 29 TABLE B-9 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TAXES IN -LIEU OF VEHICLE LICENSE FEE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA ---------------------------------------------• ;Vehicle License Fee $0.564 Per $1,000 in AV Growth ----------------------------------------------= 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments - Rental $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 II. Total Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Revenues $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 30 TABLE B-10 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I ------------------------------------------------------ • Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth) $0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% I Turnover Rate (Residential) 10% 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 II. Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 31 TABLE B-10 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - PROPERTY TRANSFER TAX RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I ------------------------------------------------------ • Transfer Tax (per $500 AV Growth) $0.550 City Share of Transfer Tax 50% I Turnover Rate (Residential)------------------- 10%1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments- Rental $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 II. Total Property Transfer Tax Revenues $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 32 TABLE B-11 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPENDING BY RESIDENTS RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 2021 Apartments - Rental I. Estimate of Household Income Average Rent $2,646 (1) Total Annual Costs $31,752 of Income Spent on Housing 30% Annual Income Required $106,000 II. Number of Households Total Number of Residential Units 134 Occupancy Rate 95% Total Number of Full -Time Equivalent Households 127 III. Aggregate Household Income $13,494,000 (1) Per Developer. Assumes $2.68 per SF. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename is \Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 33 TABLE B-12 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA i---------------------------------------------------1 I Taxable Spending by Residents (1) 33.5% 1 1 Temecula Spending Capture 80% 1 City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% i i IAnnualEscalation--------------------------- 3_0%J 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments -Rental $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 ll. Total Sales Tax Revenues $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 (1) KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 34 TABLE B-12 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SALES TAX, RESIDENT SPENDING RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA i---------------------------------------------------1 I Taxable Spending by Residents (1) 33.5% 1 1 Temecula Spending Capture 80% 1 City Portion of Sales Tax 1.0% i i IAnnualEscalation--------------------------- 3_0%J 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments -Rental $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 II. Total Sales Tax Revenues $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 (1) KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern Califcfornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 35 TABLE B-13 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 Taxable Spending by Residents (t) 33.5% 1 ;Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% Supporting Operations 90.0% 1 Annual Escalation `--------------------------------------------------� 3.0% 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 II. Total Measure 5 Revenues $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 (1) KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern California counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 36 TABLE B-13 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - MEASURE S RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA 1 Taxable Spending by Residents (t) 33.5% 1 ;Temecula Spending Capture 80% Measure S - Effective Revenues 1.0% Supporting Operations 90.0% 1 Annual Escalation `--------------------------------------------------� 3.0% 1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments - Rental $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 II. Total Measure 5 Revenues $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 (1) KMA assumption, based on review of spending ratios in Southern Califfornia counties. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 37 TABLE B-14 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total Total Total Total Population/ Resident Demographic Profile: Population Employment Jobs Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 111,970 (1) 54,313 (2) 166,283 129,893 Rendezvous 255 0 255 255 Amount Per City Resident or New Residents/ FY 2021 Service Resident Resident Operating Budget (4) Population Equivalent Equivalents I. Franchise Fees $3,229,600 P $28.84 255 II. Business Licenses $265,700 RE $2.05 255 III. Fines and Forfeitures $724,600 RE $5.58 255 IV. Vehicle License Fees $67,600 P $0.60 255 V. Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF $2,215,900 P $19.79 255 VI. Miscellaneous Revenue $249,100 RE $1.92 255 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin -Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002- 2018). (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that approximately three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Based on 3-year historical average (FY 2018 - FY 2020 Actual Revenue received). Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula—Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 40 TABLE B-15 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total Residential Population Total Resident Equivalents III. Other Annual General Fund Revenues (i) Franchise Fees (2) Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population $28.84 $2.05 $5.58 $0.60 $19.79 $1.92 P RE RE P P RE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 $7,691 $7,806 $7,924 $8,042 $8,163 $8,285 $8,410 $8,536 $8,664 $8,794 $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $702 $1,532 $1,570 $1,609 $1,650 $1,691 $1,733 $1,777 $1,821 $1,866 $1,913 $166 $170 $174 $179 $183 $188 $192 $197 $202 $207 $5,435 $5,570 $5,710 $5,852 $5,999 $6,149 $6,302 $6,460 $6,621 $6,787 527 540 553 567 581 596 611 626 642 658 IV. Total Other Revenues I $15,900 $16,200 $16,600 $16,900 $17,200 $17,600 $17,900 $18,300 $18,700 $19,1001 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. (2) Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula-Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 38 TABLE B-15 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - OTHER REVENUES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total Residential Population Total Resident Equivalents III. Other Annual General Fund Revenues (i) Franchise Fees(2) Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Resident Service Equivalent Population $28.84 $2.05 $5.58 $0.60 $19.79 $1.92 P RE RE P P RE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 $8,926 $9,060 $9,196 $9,333 $719 $737 $755 $774 $1,961 $2,010 $2,060 $2,112 $212 $218 $223 $229 $6,957 $7,131 $7,309 $7,492 674 691 708 726 $9,473 $9,616 $9,760 $794 $814 $834 $2,164 $2,219 $2,274 $234 $240 $246 $7,679 $7,871 $8,068 744 763 782 $9,906 $10,055 $10,206 $855 $876 $898 $2,331 $2,389 $2,449 $252 $259 $265 $8,269 $8,476 $8,688 801 821 842 I IV. Total Other Revenues 1 $19,400 $19,800 $20,300 $20,700 $21,100 $21,500 $22,000 $22,400 $22,900 $23,3001 (1) Assumes escalation factor of 2.5%. (2) Assumes escalation factor of 1.5%. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula-Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 39 TABLE B-16 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES -SPECIAL TAX (MEASURE C) REVENUE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I --------------------------------------------------------- !Special Tax (Measure Q Multi -Family EDU Factor 0.75 1 Special Tax Per EDU (1) $74.44 /Parcel 1 5---------------------------------------------------------� 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 I. Apartments - Rental $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 II. Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 (1) Source: City of Temecula. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 41 TABLE B-16 ANNUAL RECURRING REVENUES - SPECIALTAX (MEASURE C)REVENUE RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA I --------------------------------------------------------- !Special Tax (Measure Q Multi -Family EDU Factor 0.75 1 Special Tax Per EDU (1) $74.44 /Parcel 1 5---------------------------------------------------------� 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Apartments - Rental $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 II. Total Special Tax (Measure C) Revenue $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 (1) Source: City of Temecula. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 42 TABLE B-17 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Total Total Total Total Population/ Resident Demographic Profile: Population Employment lobs Equivalents (3) City of Temecula 111,970 (t) 54,313 (2) 166,283 129,893 Rendezvous 255 0 255 255 Amount Per Net New City Resident or New Residents/ "Marginal Cost' Residents/ FY 2021 Escalation Service Population Resident Resident Impact Resident Operating Budget (4) Factor (s) Population Tvpe Equivalent Equivalent Adjustment Equivalent I. Police --- 5.00% --- --- $352.36 (6) 255 5% 242 II. City Council $592,662 2.75% RE 129,893 $4.56 255 40% 153 III. Community Support $125,000 2.00% RE 129,893 $0.96 255 80% 51 IV. General Government $4,886,310 2.50% RE 129,893 $37.62 255 40% 153 V. City Clerk $1,311,452 3.00% RE 129,893 $10.10 255 30% 179 VI. City Attorney $961,146 2.00% RE 129,893 $7.40 255 40% 153 VII. Finance $3,051,141 2.75% RE 129,893 $23.49 255 30% 179 Vill. Community Development $3,953,497 2.75% RE 129,893 $30.44 255 20% 204 IX. Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. $7,063,704 2.50% RE 129,893 $54.38 255 10% 230 X. Public Works - Parks Maintenance $4,007,007 2.50% P 111,970 $35.79 255 10% 230 XI. Fire $9,619,533 5.00% RE 129,893 $74.06 255 5% 242 XII. Property Tax Administration $94,195 2.00% RE 129,893 $0.73 255 30% 179 XIII. Retiree Medical Contribution $1,000,000 3.00% RE 129,893 $7.70 255 90% 26 XIV. PERS Replacement Benefit $99,434 3.00% RE 129,893 $0.77 255 100% 0 XV. Asset Management Fund $3,000,000 2.50% RE 129,893 $23.10 255 0% 255 XVI. Total Annual Expenditures $39,765,081 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population (1) Source: California Department of Finance, January 1, 2020. (2) U.S. Census Bureau, OnTheMap Application and LEHD Origin -Destination Employment Statistics (Beginning of Quarter Employment, 2nd Quarter of 2002-2018). (3) KMA assumption. Assumes that three employees have the same impact as one resident. (4) Source: See Table A-4. (5) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (6) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population per the FY 2021 Mid -Year Budget. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 43 TABLE B-18 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service Equivalent Factor (1) Adjustment Pop. Total Residential Population Total Resident Equivalents Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 )2) 5.00% City Council $4.56 2.75% Community Support $0.96 2.00% General Government $37.62 2.50% City Clerk $10.10 3.00% City Attorney $7.40 2.00% Finance $23.49 2.75% Community Development $30.44 2.75% Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. $54.38 2.50% Public Works- Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50% Fire $74.06 5.00% Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00% Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00% PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00% Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50% (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. 5% 40% 80% 40% 30% 40% 30% 20% 10% 10% 5% 30% 90% 100% 0% RE RE RE RE RE RE RE RE P RE RE RE RE RE 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 $98,815 $103,756 $108,943 $114,390 $120,110 $126,116 $132,421 $139,042 $145,994 $153,294 $757 $778 $800 $821 $844 $867 $891 $916 $941 $967 $52 $53 $54 $55 $56 $58 $59 $60 $61 $62 $6,198 $6,353 $6,512 $6,675 $6,842 $7,013 $7,188 $7,368 $7,552 $7,741 $1,969 $2,028 $2,089 $2,152 $2,216 $2,283 $2,351 $2,422 $2,495 $2,570 $1,201 $1,225 $1,250 $1,275 $1,300 $1,326 $1,353 $1,380 $1,408 $1,436 $4,548 $4,673 $4,802 $4,934 $5,070 $5,209 $5,352 $5,500 $5,651 $5,806 $6,736 $6,921 $7,111 $7,307 $7,508 $7,714 $7,926 $8,144 $8,368 $8,598 $13,440 $13,776 $14,120 $14,473 $14,835 $15,206 $15,586 $15,976 $16,375 $16,785 $8,844 $9,066 $9,292 $9,525 $9,763 $10,007 $10,257 $10,513 $10,776 $11,046 $20,768 $21,807 $22,897 $24,042 $25,244 $26,506 $27,831 $29,223 $30,684 $32,218 $137 $140 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $161 $164 $215 $221 $228 $234 $241 $249 $256 $264 $272 $280 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 6 342 $6,501 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,921 Legend: RE - Resident Equivalent P - Population Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 44 TABLE B-18 ESTIMATE OF ANNUAL RECURRING EXPENDITURES RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA FY 2021 Amount Per Resident or Annual "Marginal Cost" Resident Escalation Impact Service 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Equivalent Factor (1) Adjustment Pop. FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 I. Total Residential Population 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 II. Total Resident Equivalents 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 255 III. Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $352.36 (2) 5.00% 5% --- $160,959 $169,007 $177,457 $186,330 $195,647 $205,429 $215,700 $226,485 $237,810 $249,700 City Council $4.56 2.75% 40% RE $993 $1,021 $1,049 $1,078 $1,107 $1,138 $1,169 $1,201 $1,234 $1,268 Community Support $0.96 2.00% 80% RE $63 $65 $66 $67 $69 $70 $71 $73 $74 $76 General Government $37.62 2.50% 40% RE $7,934 $8,132 $8,336 $8,544 $8,758 $8,977 $9,201 $9,431 $9,667 $9,909 City Clerk $10.10 3.00% 30% RE $2,647 $2,726 $2,808 $2,892 $2,979 $3,068 $3,160 $3,255 $3,353 $3,453 City Attorney $7.40 2.00% 40% RE $1,465 $1,494 $1,524 $1,554 $1,585 $1,617 $1,649 $1,682 $1,716 $1,750 Finance $23.49 2.75% 30% RE $5,966 $6,130 $6,299 $6,472 $6,650 $6,833 $7,021 $7,214 $7,412 $7,616 Community Development $30.44 2.75% 20% RE $8,835 $9,078 $9,327 $9,584 $9,847 $10,118 $10,396 $10,682 $10,976 $11,278 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. $54.38 2.50% 10% RE $17,204 $17,634 $18,075 $18,527 $18,990 $19,465 $19,952 $20,451 $20,962 $21,486 Public Works- Parks Maintenance $35.79 2.50% 10% P $11,322 $11,605 $11,895 $12,192 $12,497 $12,809 $13,130 $13,458 $13,794 $14,139 Fire $74.06 5.00% 5% RE $33,829 $35,521 $37,297 $39,162 $41,120 $43,176 $45,334 $47,601 $49,981 $52,480 Property Tax Administration $0.73 2.00% 30% RE $167 $171 $174 $178 $181 $185 $189 $192 $196 $200 Retiree Medical Contribution $7.70 3.00% 90% RE $288 $297 $306 $315 $324 $334 $344 $355 $365 $376 PERS Replacement Benefit $0.77 3.00% 100% RE $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $23.10 2.50% 0% RE $8,119 $8,322 $8,743 $8,961 $9,186 $9,415 $9,651 $9,892 $10,139 IV. Total Annual Expenditures $259,791 $271,203 $283,143 $295,638 $308,715 $322,405 $336,731 $351,731 $367,432 $383,870 (1) Source: Finance Department, City of Temecula. (2) Based on the cost for staffing one Police Officer ($352,363) per 1,000 population. Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: i:/Temecula_Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 45 TABLE B-19 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FY 2024 FY 2025 FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 FY 2030 FY 2031 FY 2032 FY 2033 $26,984 $27,523 $28,074 $28,635 $29,208 $29,792 $30,388 $30,995 $31,615 $32,248 $30,601 $31,213 $31,837 $32,474 $33,124 $33,786 $34,462 $35,151 $35,854 $36,571 $2,986 $3,046 $3,107 $3,169 $3,232 $3,297 $3,363 $3,430 $3,499 $3,569 $41,600 $42,800 $44,100 $45,500 $46,800 $48,200 $49,700 $51,200 $52,700 $54,300 $38,600 $39,700 $40,900 $42,100 $43,400 $44,700 $46,000 $47,400 $48,800 $50,300 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,691 $7,806 $7,924 $8,042 $8,163 $8,285 $8,410 $8,536 $8,664 $8,794 $562 $576 $590 $605 $620 $636 $651 $668 $684 $702 $1,532 $1,570 $1,609 $1,650 $1,691 $1,733 $1,777 $1,821 $1,866 $1,913 $166 $170 $174 $179 $183 $188 $192 $197 $202 $207 $5,435 $5,570 $5,710 $5,852 $5,999 $6,149 $6,302 $6,460 $6,621 $6,787 527 540 553 567 581 596 611 626 642 658 $164,165 $167,995 $172,059 $176,254 $180,482 $184,843 $189,337 $193,965 $198,628 $203,530 II. Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $98,815 $103,756 $108,943 $114,390 $120,110 $126,116 $132,421 $139,042 $145,994 $153,294 City Council $757 $778 $800 $821 $844 $867 $891 $916 $941 $967 Community Support $52 $53 $54 $55 $56 $58 $59 $60 $61 $62 General Government $6,198 $6,353 $6,512 $6,675 $6,842 $7,013 $7,188 $7,368 $7,552 $7,741 City Clerk $1,969 $2,028 $2,089 $2,152 $2,216 $2,283 $2,351 $2,422 $2,495 $2,570 City Attorney $1,201 $1,225 $1,250 $1,275 $1,300 $1,326 $1,353 $1,380 $1,408 $1,436 Finance $4,548 $4,673 $4,802 $4,934 $5,070 $5,209 $5,352 $5,500 $5,651 $5,806 Community Development $6,736 $6,921 $7,111 $7,307 $7,508 $7,714 $7,926 $8,144 $8,368 $8,598 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. $13,440 $13,776 $14,120 $14,473 $14,835 $15,206 $15,586 $15,976 $16,375 $16,785 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $8,844 $9,066 $9,292 $9,525 $9,763 $10,007 $10,257 $10,513 $10,776 $11,046 Fire $20,768 $21,807 $22,897 $24,042 $25,244 $26,506 $27,831 $29,223 $30,684 $32,218 Property Tax Administration $137 $140 $143 $146 $149 $152 $155 $158 $161 $164 Retiree Medical Contribution $215 $221 $228 $234 $241 $249 $256 $264 $272 $280 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $6,342 $6,501 $6,663 $6,830 $7,001 $7,176 $7,355 $7,539 $7,727 $7,921 Total Expenditures $170,022 $177,298 $184,904 $192,859 $201,179 $209,882 $218,981 $228,505 $238,465 $248,888 III. Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) ($5,857) ($9,303) ($12,845) ($16,605) ($20p697) ($25,039) ($29,644) ($34,540) ($39,837) ($45,358) Per Unit Per Year ($44) ($69) ($96) ($124) ($154) ($187) ($221) ($258) ($297) ($338) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 0.97 0.95 0.93 0.91 0.90 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.83 0.82 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula-Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 46 TABLE B-19 ANNUAL GENERAL FUND FISCAL IMPACT RENDEZVOUS CITY OF TEMECULA Annual General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax In -Lieu of VLF Property Transfer Tax Sales Tax - Resident Spending Measure S Measure C Franchise Fees Business Licenses Fines and Forfeitures Vehicle License Fees Operating Transfers In - Gas Tax/SLESF Miscellaneous Revenue Total Revenues 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 FY 2034 FY 2035 FY 2036 FY 2037 FY 2038 FY 2039 FY 2040 FY 2041 FY 2042 FY 2043 $32,892 $33,550 $34,221 $34,906 $35,604 $36,316 $37,042 $37,783 $38,539 $39,310 $37,302 $38,049 $38,810 $39,586 $40,378 $41,185 $42,009 $42,849 $43,706 $44,580 $3,640 $3,713 $3,787 $3,863 $3,940 $4,019 $4,099 $4,181 $4,265 $4,350 $55,900 $57,600 $59,300 $61,100 $62,900 $64,800 $66,800 $68,800 $70,800 $72,900 $51,800 $53,400 $55,000 $56,600 $58,300 $60,100 $61,900 $63,700 $65,600 $67,600 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $7,481 $8,926 $9,060 $9,196 $9,333 $9,473 $9,616 $9,760 $9,906 $10,055 $10,206 $719 $737 $755 $774 $794 $814 $834 $855 $876 $898 $1,961 $2,010 $2,060 $2,112 $2,164 $2,219 $2,274 $2,331 $2,389 $2,449 $212 $218 $223 $229 $234 $240 $246 $252 $259 $265 $6,957 $7,131 $7,309 $7,492 $7,679 $7,871 $8,068 $8,269 $8,476 $8,688 674 691 708 726 744 763 782 801 821 842 $208,464 $213,640 $218,850 $224,202 $229,691 $235,424 $241,295 $247,208 $253,267 $259,569 II. Annual General Fund Expenditures Police $160,959 $169,007 $177,457 $186,330 $195,647 $205,429 $215,700 $226,485 $237,810 $249,700 City Council $993 $1,021 $1,049 $1,078 $1,107 $1,138 $1,169 $1,201 $1,234 $1,268 Community Support $63 $65 $66 $67 $69 $70 $71 $73 $74 $76 General Government $7,934 $8,132 $8,336 $8,544 $8,758 $8,977 $9,201 $9,431 $9,667 $9,909 City Clerk $2,647 $2,726 $2,808 $2,892 $2,979 $3,068 $3,160 $3,255 $3,353 $3,453 City Attorney $1,465 $1,494 $1,524 $1,554 $1,585 $1,617 $1,649 $1,682 $1,716 $1,750 Finance $5,966 $6,130 $6,299 $6,472 $6,650 $6,833 $7,021 $7,214 $7,412 $7,616 Community Development $8,835 $9,078 $9,327 $9,584 $9,847 $10,118 $10,396 $10,682 $10,976 $11,278 Public Works - Land Development, Public Works, etc. $17,204 $17,634 $18,075 $18,527 $18,990 $19,465 $19,952 $20,451 $20,962 $21,486 Public Works - Parks Maintenance $11,322 $11,605 $11,895 $12,192 $12,497 $12,809 $13,130 $13,458 $13,794 $14,139 Fire $33,829 $35,521 $37,297 $39,162 $41,120 $43,176 $45,334 $47,601 $49,981 $52,480 Property Tax Administration $167 $171 $174 $178 $181 $185 $189 $192 $196 $200 Retiree Medical Contribution $288 $297 $306 $315 $324 $334 $344 $355 $365 $376 PERS Replacement Benefit $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Asset Management Fund $8,119 $8,322 $8,530 $8,743 $8,961 $9,186 $9,415 $9,651 $9,892 $10,139 Total Expenditures $259,791 $271,203 $283,143 $295,638 $308,715 $322,405 $336,731 $351,731 $367,432 $383,870 III. Annual Recurring Surplus/(Deficit) ($51,327) ($57,563) ($64,293) ($71,436) ($79,024) ($86,981) ($95,436) ($104,523) ($114,165) ($124,301) Per Unit Per Year ($383) ($430) ($480) ($533) ($590) ($649) ($712) ($780) ($852) ($928) Revenues to Expenditure Ratio 0.80 0.79 0.77 0.76 0.74 0.73 0.72 0.70 0.69 0.68 Prepared by: Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. Filename: is/Temecula-Rendezvous FIA_06-09-22;6/9/2022;mdt Page 47 P: (626) 314-3821 F: (626) 389-5414 E: info@mitchtsailaw.com VIA E-MAIL July 19, 2022 0 Mitchell M. Tsai Scott Cooper Associate Planner City of Temecula 4100 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 Em: scott.cooper&temeculaca.gov I' 139 South Hudson Avenue Supplemental Information Received 07/20/2022 Public Hearing Item #4 (PA20-1325) CIRCULATION COPIES: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS: Chairperson Watts Vice Chairperson Turley-Trejo Commissioner Hagel Commissioner Ruiz Commissioner Telesio City Staff: Luke Watson (Deputy City Manager) Stuart Fisk (Planning Manager) Matt Peters (Senior Planner) Patrick Thomas (Director of PW) Ron Moreno IPnnopalEripeee]eMSurre�) Mariosla Marroquin (Asst. City Atty.) Denise Jacobo (Senior Admin Asst.) Press Binder Copy Public Binder Copy other(s) Scott Cooper, Senor Planner) ❑ginal to: Application Project File_ Agenda Item No. 4 City of Temecula Rendezvous Phase 11 Apartments Pro' ect Dear Scott Cooper, Attorney At Law Pasadena, Cali On behalf of the Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters ("Southwest Carpenter" or "SWRCC"), my Office is submitting these comments regarding Agenda Item No. 4. The City of Temecula Rendezvous Phase 11 Apartments Project (the "Project") for the City of Temecula's (the "City's") July 20, 2022, Planning Commission meeting. The Southwest Carpenters is a labor union representing 50,000 union carpenters in six states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered land use planning and addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. Individual members of the Southwest Carpenters live, work and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts. SWRCC expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearings and proceedings related to this Project. Cal. Gov. Code § 65009(b); Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21177(a); Bakersfield Citi.Zens for Local Control P. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal. App. 4th 1184, 1199-1203; see Galante Vineyards v. Monterey rater Dist. (1997) 60 Cal. App. 4th 1109, 1121. SWRCC incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the EIR submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. Citi.Zens for Clean Energy v City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 2of19 City of Voodland (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the Project's environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties). Moreover, SWRCC requests that the City provide notice for any and all notices referring or related to the Project issued under the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), Cal Public Resources Code ("PRC") § 21000 et seq, and the California Planning and Zoning Law ("Planning and Zoning Law"), Cal. Gov't Code 55 65000-65010. California Public Resources Code Sections 21092.2, and 21167(� and Government Code Section 65092 require agencies to mail such notices to any person who has filed a written request for them with the clerk of the agency's governing body. The City should require the use of a local skilled and trained workforce to benefit the community's economic development and environment. The City should require the use of workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor Management apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California, or have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state approved apprenticeship training program or who are registered apprentices in an apprenticeship training program approved by the State of California. Community benefits such as local hire and skilled and trained workforce requirements can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project Site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions and providing localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note: [A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 3of19 March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling. Skilled and trained workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the UC Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded: zas .. labor should be considered an investment rather than a cost — and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.' Local skilled and trained workforce requirements and policies have significant environmental benefits since they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount of and length of job commutes and their associated greenhouse gas emissions. Recently, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u] se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program or a skilled and trained workforce with a local hire component" can result in air pollutant reductions.2 Cities are increasingly adopting local skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements into general plans and municipal codes. For example, the City of Hayward 2040 General Plan requires the City to "promote local hiring ... to help achieve a more positive jobs -housing balance, and reduce regional commuting, gas consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions."3 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at https: / /laborcenter.berkeley. edu/wp-content/uploads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. 2 South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve Supporting Budget Actions, available athttp://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ Agendas/Governing-Board/2021 /2021-May7-027.12dPsfvrsn=10. 3 City of Hayward (2014) Hayward 2040 General Plan Policy Document at p. 3-99, available athtips://www.haywardca.gov/sites/default/files/documents/General Plan FINAL.pdf. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 4of19 In fact, the City of Hayward has gone as far as to adopt a Skilled Labor Force policy into its Downtown Specific Plan and municipal code, requiring developments in its Downtown area to requiring that the City "[c]ontribute to the stabilization of regional construction markets by spurring applicants of housing and nonresidential developments to require contractors to utilize apprentices from state -approved, joint labor-management training programs,..."' In addition, the City of Hayward requires all projects 30,000 square feet or larger to "utilize apprentices from state -approved, joint labor-management training programs."' Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008: People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.' In addition, local hire mandates as well as skill training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled. As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions since the skill requirements of available local jobs must be matched to those held by local residents.' Some municipalities have tied local hire and skilled and trained workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. As Cervero and Duncan note: In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing." The 4 City of Hayward (2019) Hayward Downtown Specific Plan at p. 5-24, available at https: / /www.hayward-ca.gov/ sites /default/files /Hayward%20Downtown% 20S12ecific%20PIan.12df. 5 City of Hayward Municipal Code, Chapter 10, § 28.5.3.020(C). 6 California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available athttps://cproundtable.org/static/media/uploads/publications/cprJobs- housing_pdf. ' Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available athttp://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Up1oads/UTCT- 825.12df City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 5of19 city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits. The City should consider utilizing skilled and trained workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and mitigate greenhouse gas, air quality and transportation impacts. II. THE PROJECT WOULD BE APPROVED IN VIOLATION OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT A. Background Concerning the California Environmental Quality Act CEQA has two basic purposes. First, CEQA is designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CCR" or "CEQA Guidelines") § 15002(a) (1). "Its purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made. Thus, the EIR `protects not only the environment but also informed self-government.' [Citation.]" Citizens of Goleta Valley P. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. The EIR has been described as "an environmental `alarm bell' whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return." Berkeley Keep Jets Over the Bay P. Bd. of Port Comm rs. (2001) 91 Cal. App.4th 1344, 1354 ("Berkeley Jets'); County of Inyo v. Yorty (1973) 32 Cal.App.3d 795, 810. Second, CEQA directs public agencies to avoid or reduce environmental damage when possible by requiring alternatives or mitigation measures. CEQA Guidelines § 15002(a)(2) and (3). See also, Berkeley Jets, 91 Cal.App.4th 1344, 1354; Citi_Zens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal.3d 553; Laurel Heights IfnprovementAssn V. Re gents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 400. The EIR serves to provide public agencies and the public in general with information about the effect that a proposed project is likely to have on the environment and to "identify ways that City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 6of19 environmental damage can be avoided or significantly reduced." CEQA Guidelines 5 15002(a)(2). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has "eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible" and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are "acceptable due to overriding concerns" specified in CEQA section 21081. CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b)(2)(A—B). B. The City Should Prepare an EIR for the Project A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA. This presumption is reflected in what is known as the "fair argument" standard, under which an agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. Quail Botanical Gardens Found., Inc. v City of Encinitas (1994) 29 Cal.App.4th 1597, 1602; Friends of "B" St. v City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988, 1002. The fair argument test stems from the statutory mandate that an EIR be prepared for any project that "may have a significant effect on the environment." PRC § 21151; No Oil, Inc. v City of Los An (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75; Jensen v City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Cal.App.5th 877, 884. Under this test, if a proposed project is not exempt and may cause a significant effect on the environment, the lead agency must prepare an EIR. PRC §§ 21100(a), 21151; CEQA Guidelines § 15064(a)(1), (�(1). An EIR may be dispensed with only if the lead agency finds no substantial evidence in the initial study or elsewhere in the record that the project may have a significant effect on the environment. Parker Shattuck Neighbors v Berkeley City Council (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 768, 785. In such a situation, the agency must adopt a negative declaration. PRC 21080(c)(1); CEQA Guidelines §§ 15063(b)(2), 15064(I (3). "Significant effect upon the environment" is defined as "a substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in the environment." PRC § 21068; CEQA Guidelines § 15382. A project "may" have a significant effect on the environment if there is a "reasonable probability" that it will result in a significant impact. No Oil, Inc. v City of Los Angeles, 13 Cal.3d at 83 n.16; Sundstrom v County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 309. If any aspect of the project may result in a significant impact on the environment, an EIR must be prepared even if the overall effect of the project is beneficial. CEQA Guidelines §15063(b)(1). See County Sanitation Dist. No. 2 v County of Kern (2005) 127 Cal.App.4th 1544, 1580. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 7of19 This standard sets a "low threshold" for preparation of an EIR. Consolidated Inig. Dist. v City of Selma (2012) 204 Cal.AppAth 187, 207; Nelson v County of Kern (2010) 190 Cal.App.4th 252; Pocket Protectors v City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 903, 928; Bowman v City of Berkeley (2004) 122 Cal.AppAth 572, 580; Citizen Action to Serve All Students v Tbornley (1990) 222 Cal.App.3d 748, 754; Sundstrom v County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 310. If substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that the project may have a significant environmental effect, the lead agency must prepare an EIR even if other substantial evidence before it indicates the project will have no significant effect. See Jensen v City of Santa Rosa (2018) 23 Ca1.App.5th 877, 886; Clews Land & Livestock v City of San Diego (2017) 19 Cal.App.5th 161, 183; Stanislaus Audubon Socy, Inc. v County of Stanislaus (1995) 33 Cal.App.4th 144, 150; Brentwood Assn for No Drilling Inc. v City of Los An (1982) 134 Cal.App.3d 491; Friends of "B" St. v City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988. See also CEQA Guidelines § 15064(f)(1). As explained in full below, there is a fair argument that the Project will have a significant effect on the environment. As a result, the "low threshold" for preparation of an EIR has been met and the City must prepare an EIR. C. CEQA Requires Revision and Recirculation of a Mitigated Negative Declaration When Substantial Changes or New Information Comes to Light Once a negative declaration has been circulated, it may need to be recirculated for another round of review and comment if it is "substantially revised" after the public notice of the first circulation period has been given. CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5(a). A substantial revision includes two situations CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5(b)): A new, avoidable significant effect is identified, and to reduce that effect to a level of insignificance, mitigation measures or project revisions must be added. The lead agency finds that the mitigation measures or project revisions originally included in the negative declaration will not reduce potentially significant impacts to a level of insignificance, and new mitigation measures or project revisions are required. New information will require recirculation when it amounts to a substantial revision of the negative declaration, which is defined to mean the identification of new significant environmental impacts or the addition of new mitigation that is required City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 8of19 to avoid a significant environmental impact. CEQA Guidelines §15073.5(b). If the new information reveals a new significant impact that cannot be mitigated or avoided, then the lead agency must prepare an EIR before approving the project. CEQA Guidelines § 15073.5(d). Revisions to a project to mitigate potentially significant environmental effects must be included in the negative declaration that is circulated for public review. PRC § 21080(c)(2); CEQA Guidelines §5 15070(b), 15071(e). Based on the arguments set forth below, in the alternative, Commenter requests that the City recirculate the IS/MND upon making any revisions. This is especially important considering the lack of ambient noise impact analysis. C. The IS/MND Fails to Supbort Its Findings with Substantial Evidence When new information is brought to light showing that an impact previously discussed in the IS/MND but found to be insignificant with or without mitigation in the IS/MND's analysis has the potential for a significant environmental impact supported by substantial evidence, the IS/MND must consider and resolve the conflict in the evidence. See Visalia Retail, L.P. v. City of Visalia (2018) 20 Cal.App.5th 1, 13, 17; see also Protect the HistoricAmador Vatenvays P. Amador WlaterAgency (2004) 116 Cal. App. 4th 1099, 1109. While a lead agency has discretion to formulate standards for determining significance and the need for mitigation measures —the choice of any standards or thresholds of significance must be "based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data and an exercise of reasoned judgment based on substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines § 15064(b); Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. P. San Diego Assn of Gov'ts (2017) 3 Cal.App.5th 497, 515; Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Inv. & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 206. And when there is evidence that an impact could be significant, an EIR cannot adopt a contrary finding without providing an adequate explanation along with supporting evidence. East Sacramento Partnersbp for a Livable City v. City of Sacramento (2016) 5 Cal. App. 5th 281, 302. In addition, a determination that regulatory compliance will be sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project -specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance. In Californians forAlternatives to Toxics P. Department of Food &Agric. (2005) 136 Cal.App.4th 1, the court set aside an EIR for a statewide crop disease control plan because it did not include an evaluation of the City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 9of19 risks to the environment and human health from the proposed program but simply presumed that no adverse impacts would occur from use of pesticides in accordance with the registration and labeling program of the California Department of Pesticide Regulation. See also Ebbetts Pass Forest hatch v Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal.App.4th 936, 956 (fact that Department of Pesticide Regulation had assessed environmental effects of certain herbicides in general did not excuse failure to assess effects of their use for specific timber harvesting project). 1. The IS/MND Fails to Support its Land Use Analysis with Substantial Evidence. The IS/MND claims that the Project would have a less than significant impact concerning conflicts with any land use plan, policy, or regulation. (IS/MND 56). However, the conclusion of less than significant is reached by prematurely concluding that the Project is consistent with the General Plan when it adoption is being sought in the very meeting that is seeking its adoption. This is putting the cart before the horse. The IS/MND's shortcut land use analysis is not adequate. See, e.g., Friends of Lagoon Valley P. City of Vacaville (2007) 154 Cal.App.4th 807, 815 (upholding overall consistency finding even though project deviated from some plan provisions because plan allowed for balancing of competing policies). A clear and direct conflict with a mandatory provision of a general or specific plan usually amounts to an inconsistency that will preclude project approval. See Families Unafraid v. County of El Dorado (1998) 62 Cal.App.4th 1332, 1341 (project must satisfy mandatory general plan policy that is fundamental and unambiguous and does not allow discretion in interpretation and application). The IS/MND should be revised to include a more specific analysis of consistency to support its land use conclusion. 2. The ISIMND Fails to Support its Findings on Greenhouse Gas Impacts with Substantial Evidence. CEQA Guidelines § 15064.4 allow a lead agency to determine the significance of a project's GHG impact via a qualitative analysis (e.g., extent to which a project complies with regulations or requirements of state/regional/local GHG plans), and/or a quantitative analysis (e.g., using model or methodology to estimate project emissions and compare it to a numeric threshold). So too, CEQA Guidelines allow lead agencies to select what model or methodology to estimate GHG emissions so City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 10 of 19 long as the selection is supported with substantial evidence, and the lead agency "should explain the limitations of the particular model or methodology selected for use." CEQA Guidelines § 15064.4(c). Here, the IS/MND included both qualitative and quantitative analyses. However, the IS/MND does not rely on any quantitative analysis to determine compliance with any numerical thresholds and instead relies solely on consistency with the City's General Plan in making a determination that the Project's GHG impacts are less than significant without mitigation. IS/MND, pp. 43-47. CEQA Guidelines sections 15064.4(b)(3) and 15183.5(b) allow a lead agency to consider a project's consistency with regulations or requirements adopted to implement a statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions. CEQA Guidelines §§ 15064.4(b)(3) and 15183.5(b)(1) make clear qualified GHG reduction plans or CAP should include the following features: (1) Inventory: Quantify GHG emissions, both existing and projected over a specified time period, resulting from activities (e.g., projects) within a defined geographic area (e.g., lead agency jurisdiction); (2) Establish GHG Reduction Goal: Establish a level, based on substantial evidence, below which the contribution to GHG emissions from activities covered by the plan would not be cumulatively considerable; (3) Analyze Project Types: Identify and analyze the GHG emissions resulting from specific actions or categories of actions anticipated within the geographic area; (4) Craft Performance Based Mitigation Measures: Specify measures or a group of measures, including performance standards, that substantial evidence demonstrates, if implemented on a project -by -project basis, would collectively achieve the specified emissions level; (5) Monitoring: Establish a mechanism to monitor the CAP progress toward achieving said level and to require amendment if the plan is not achieving specified levels; City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 11 of 19 Collectively, the above -listed features tie qualitative measures to quantitative results, which in turn become binding via proper monitoring and enforcement by the jurisdiction —all resulting in real GHG reductions for the jurisdiction as a whole, and the substantial evidence that the incremental contribution of an individual project is not cumulatively considerable. Second, it is not enough for an environmental document to conclude there is no significant GHG emissions impacts based upon a determination of consistency with a GHG Reduction Plan, without also making a determination based upon substantial evidence of the project's actual cumulative contributions to GHG emissions. In other words, a determination of consistency is only a starting point.' Compliance or non- compliance is merely one factor to be considered. The lead agency must explain how reliance on any particular plan or regulation addresses a potential impact. Here, however, the IS/MND fails to demonstrate that the GHG Reduction Plan includes the above -listed requirements to be considered a qualified CAP or GHG Reduction Plan for the City. As such, the IS/MND leaves an analytical gap showing that compliance with said plans can be used for a project -level significance determination for the Project. Second, the IS/MND fails to explain how compliance with the GHG Reduction Plan leads to a less than significant impact. i. The GHG Reduction Plan is Not a Qualified CAP or GHG Reduction Plan. First, there is no evidence that the General Plan meets any of the five goals listed above as a qualified CAP or GHG Reduction Plan under CEQA Guidelines §§ 15064.4(b)(3) and 15183.5(b)(1). In fact, even though the Los Angeles General Plan is available on the City's website for review, the IS/MND does not make those plans readily available for review. It is also unclear where or how, and what sections the IS/MND is consistent with the General Plan or the CAP revised in 2020. The IS/MND or EIR should explain how the GHG Reduction Plan qualifies for consistency analysis under CEQA Guidelines 55 15064.4(b)(3) and 15183.5(b)(1) and 8 Cal. Nat. Res. Agency, Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines, OAL Notice File No. Z-2018-0116-12 (Nov. 2018), at p. 95; see also Lighthouse Field Beach Rescue P. City of Santa Cru.Z (2005) 131 Cal. App. 4th 1170, 1207 ("[A]n inconsistency between a project and other land use controls does not in itself mandate a finding of significance. [Citations.]") City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 12 of 19 provide a copy that plan for public review, instead of making only one reference to California Air Pollution Control (pp. 77-78). ii. The ISIMND Fails to Demonstrate Compliance mill Lead to a Less than Significant Impact. Second, the IS/MND fails to explain or analyze how compliance with the General Plan, even if it qualified for a consistency evaluation, will lead to a less than significant impact. The lead agency should explain how implementing the particular requirements in the plan, regulation or program ensure that the project's incremental contribution to the cumulative effect is not cumulatively considerable" (emphasis added).' Here, the IS/MND merely indicates its consistency with the 2050 RTP/SCS IS/MND, p. 45-46. This is the extent of the analysis. This fails to demonstrate how 9 Natural Resources Agency (Nov. 2018) Final Statement of Reasons For Regulatory Action: Amendments To The State CEQA Guidelines ("2018 Final Statement of Reason"), p. 19 (adding reference to section 15183.5 to section 15064.4(b)(3) because it was "needed to clarify that lead agencies may rely on plans prepared pursuant to section 15183.5 in evaluating a project's greenhouse gas emissions[,] ... [which] is consistent with the Agency's Final Statement of Reasons for the addition of section 15064.4, which states that `proposed section 15064.4 is intended to be read in conjunction with ... proposed section 15183.5. Those sections each indicate that local and regional plans may be developed to reduce GHG emissions."'), htips://files.resources.ca.gov/cega/docs/2018 CEQA Final Statement of"/o20Reasons 111218.12df; see also Natural Resources Agency (Dec. 2009) Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action ("2009 Final Statement of Reason"), p. 27 ("Those sections each indicate that local and regional plans may be developed to reduce GHG emissions. If such plans reduce community -wide emissions to a level that is less than significant, a later project that complies with the requirements in such a plan may be found to have a less than significant impact."), http://resources.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/ Final Statement of Reasons.pdf; 2009 Final Statement of Reason, pp. 14-17 (To qualify, the plan "must ... include binding requirements to address a cumulative problem[;] ... such plans contain Oec�c requirements with respect to resources that are within the agency `s Jurisdiction to avoid or substantially lessen the agency's contributions to GHG emissions ... consistency with plans that are purely yoirational (i.e., those that include only unen orceable goals without mandatory reduction measures), and provide no assurance that emissions within the area governed by the plan will actually address the cumulative problem[;] ... by re uirin that lead agencies draw a link between the project and the specific provisions of a binding plan or regulation, section 15064(h)(3) would ensure that cumulative effects of the project are actually addressed by the plan or regulation in question.") 35 SCAG (Dec. 2015) 2016 RTP/SCS Program EIR ("PEIR"), p. 3.8-12 — 3.8-13 ("SB 375 provides that the SCS developed as part of the RTP does not regulate the use of land or dictate local land use policies, and urther Ones provides that a city's or county's land use policies and regulations, including its general plan, are not required to be consistent with the SCS. Rather, SB 375 is intended to provide a regional policy foundation that local government may build upon, i the so choose." Emphasis added), https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/ 2016dpeir 3 8 greenhousegases.pdPl624321146. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 13 of 19 compliance will in fact lead to a less than significant impact. It is not enough to state some goals or policies and then state the Project will comply with those goals or policies. For example, there are no specific references to tangible measures of consistency with the city and state goals. The IS/MND does not conduct this analysis and relies wholly on compliance statements with an unverified or non -compliant GHG Reduction Plan. iii. The ISIMND Fails to Evaluate Cumulative Project GHG Impacts. An IS/MND must discuss cumulative impacts when they are significant and the project's incremental contribution is "cumulatively considerable." CEQA Guidelines §15130(a). A project's incremental contribution is cumulatively considerable if the incremental effects of the project are significant "when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." CEQA Guidelines § 15065(a)(3). Here, there is no evidence that the IS/MND's Air Quality, Energy, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Health Risk Assessment Impact Analysis evaluated the Project's cumulative project GHG emissions. See IS/MND, Appendix A. Throughout the IS/MND's GHG analysis (pp. 43-47), it states that the total projected GHG emissions for the Project are in compliance with the South Coast Air Management District's ("SCAQMD's") adopted 2016 AQMP, yet there is no analysis of a potential cumulative impact anywhere in the Appendix. The IS/MND needs to conduct a cumulative GHG impacts analysis, and if there is a potentially significant impact, impose adequate and all feasible measures. 3. The ISIMND Fails to Anal.Ze Cumulative Project AirQuality Impacts. The IS/MND (pp. 28-32) indicates no potentially significant impacts for air quality that is mitigated to less than significant levels with Mitigation Measures 1 and 2 identified as such in Appendix A (low-VOC applications and Tier 4 Final construction equipment) —yet, as with the IS/MND GHG analysis, there is no evidence in Appendix A that any cumulative impacts analysis was conducted that included other projects. Thus, there is no substantial evidence upon which to base the IS/MND's conclusion of no significant cumulative impacts with the aforementioned mitigation measures. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 14 of 19 The IS/MND needs to conduct a cumulative air quality impacts analysis, and if there is a potentially significant impact, impose adequate and all feasible measures. 4. The ISIMND Fails to Adequately Disclose, Analy.Ze the Proyect's Significant Noise Impacts The IS/MND discloses that the Project will not have less than significant or no noise impacts and proposes no mitigation measures based on those conclusions (IS/MND 58-62). The IS/MND fails to adequately analyze all of the Project's significant noise impacts. For example, the Project's analysis excludes the impacts of the nearby sensitive receptors, including but not limited to all the nearby single-family residences in all directions, the Temecula Ridge Apartment Homes, Sage Canyon Apartments Homes, Portofino Apartments, Rancho Apartments, Vail Elementary School, Temecula Elementary School, Orchard Church, Go STEAM 4 Girls, and Zen Balancing business. The IS/MND acknowledges that construction activity is allowable between 7:00 am and 6:30 pm, times when the schools and businesses will certainly be in session and susceptible to disturbance from excessive noise levels that will almost certainly impact the schools, learning, business operations of the nearby businesses, and work productivity of those many residents who work from home in the hundreds of homes surrounding the Project site. Yet none of these details are attended to in the IS/MND. An agency may not avoid its responsibility to prepare proper environmental analysis by failing to gather relevant data. Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311. 5. The ISI MND Fails to Adequately Analy.Ze Ha.Zards and Ha.Zardous Materials Impacts The IS/MND's analysis of Hazards and Hazardous Materials Impacts is deficient. It concludes either that impacts would be less than significant, or that there would be no impact (IS/MND p. 48). This is inappropriate given the hazardous or potentially hazardous materials that need to be transported adjacent to sensitive receptors, such as all the nearby single-family residences in all directions, the Temecula Ridge Apartment Homes, Sage Canyon Apartments Homes, Portofino Apartments, Rancho Apartments, Vail Elementary School, Temecula Elementary School, Orchard Church, Go STEAM 4 Girls, and Zen Balancing business, and potentially others. The IS/MND improperly concludes that hazardous materials likely to be utilized, such as City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 15 of 19 inorganic and organic chemicals, solvents, mercury, lead, asbestos, paints and paint supplies, oil, gasoline, cleansers, pesticides, cleaning solvents, concrete, hydraulic fluids, various "cleaning materials", vehicle fuels, and assumes that the 20 to 24 month timeframe would constitute "short-term" use of these hazards and hazardous materials, or that they would be localized to the project site without explaining how they would not radiate to the nearby sensitive receptors (IS/MND 49). There is no further analysis tailored to the specific needs of the Project, and so there is no analysis conducted on the specific hazards or hazardous materials as to any of the sections that require further detail when such mitigation is implemented and supported by substantial evidence in accordance with CEQA Guideline § 15091. And, an agency may not avoid its responsibility to prepare proper environmental analysis by failing to gather relevant data. Sundstrom P. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311. 6. The ISI MND Fails to Adequately Analy.Ze the Projects Significant Biological Impacts The IS/MND discloses that the Project will have no biological impacts and proposes no mitigation measures for those conclusions (IS/MND 33-34). The IS/MND recognizes the potential for special -status plant or animal species or sensitive natural communities within the Project site (IS/MND 33) but only cites to prior rough grading and circular logic that it would not contain any suitable habitats for special -status species. The analysis cites to no survey at all, let alone a recent one, that could indicate whether the Project site is occupied by special status plant or animal species. The IS/MND is obligated to provide information germane to determining whether there are recent occupations of special status flora and fauna via a survey or equivalent evidence. Nor does the IS/MND explain why the Project Site is not located within a Criteria Cell pursuant to the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan in determining that the Project Site is outside that jurisdiction. Because of this, the IS/MND should be replaced with a more substantive EIR that adequately analyzes and mitigates these significant impacts to the local fauna. An agency may not avoid its responsibility to prepare proper environmental analysis by failing to gather relevant data. Sundstrom v. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 16 of 19 7. The ISI MND Fails to Adequately Analy.Ze the Project's Significant Transportation and Traffic Impacts The IS/MND inadequately analyzes potential transportation and traffic impacts relating to the Project (IS/MND pp. 67-69). It recognizes the existing street network and availability to public transit and adjacent highways, and specifically the Rancho California Road, Ynez Road, and Moraga Road. Despite this, the IS/MND provides insufficient analysis of transportation and traffic impacts caused by the Project. For instance, the Project is adjacent to a major thoroughfare in Temecula, which acts as a major east/west transportation artery through the city. Despite this, the IS/MND nonetheless finds that there would be less -than -significant impacts to all transportation and traffic metrics. The road is surrounded and utilized by the hundreds of nearby single-family homes and several nearby apartment complexes. The IS/MND already indicated the use of heavy construction equipment and machinery, as well as the transportation of hazardous materials. Construction is allowable between the hours of 7 AM and 6:30 PM Monday through Friday, which would likely involve simultaneous traffic congestion from construction and school pickup/drop off. Furthermore, with an increased propensity for work -from -home schedules, business, residential, and construction travel could each be impacted by the other and the Project's Development, making rush-hour times less -predictable. There is also no attendance of the impact to the nearby businesses, Church, especially considering how important Rancho California Road is to the City of Temecula generally. Despite these considerations, the IS/MND acknowledges few, if any of them. An agency may not avoid its responsibility to prepare proper environmental analysis by failing to gather relevant data. Sundstrom P. County of Mendocino (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 296, 311. The IS/MND is obligated to attend to these considerations but does not do so. SWRCC requests the City reconsider and incorporate deeper analysis as it pertains to transportation and traffic. III. THE PROJECT VIOLATES THE STATE PLANNING AND ZONING LAW AS WELL AS THE CITY'S GENERAL PLAN A. Background Regarding the State Planning and Zoning Law An EIR must identify, fully analyze and mitigate any inconsistencies between a proposed project and the general, specific, regional, and other plans that apply to the project. CEQA Guidelines § 15125(d); Pfe fer P. City of Sunnyvale City Council (2011) City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 17 of 19 200 Cal.AppAth 1552, 1566; Friends of the Eel River v. Sonoma County 1laterAgency (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 859, 881. There does not need to be a direct conflict to trigger this requirement; even if a project is "incompatible" with the "goals and policies" of a land use plan, the EIR must assess the divergence between the project and the plan, and mitigate any adverse effects of the inconsistencies. Napa Citizens for Honest Government P. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 342, 378-79; see also Pocket Protectors P. City of Sacramento (2004) 124 Cal.App.4th 903 (holding under CEQA that a significant impact exists where project conflicts with local land use policies); Friends of `B"Street P. City of Hayward (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988, 998 (held county development and infrastructure improvements must be consistent with adopted general plans) (citing Gov. Code 65302). B. The Proposed Land Use Amendments and Entitlements Conflict with SB 375 and SCAG's 2020 Regional Transportation Plan and Sustainable Communities Strat= In 2008, Senate Bill 375 amended CEQA and empowered metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs) to enact regional plans to reduce GHG emissions from passenger vehicles. MPOs are required to prepare regional transportation plans (RTP) and sustainable community strategies (SCS) in an effort to meet CARB's GHG reduction goals under SB 375. (Gov. Code § 65080(b)(2)(B).) SB 375 specifically targets GHG emissions from passenger vehicles by linking land use decisions to transportation planning. (Id.) If the regional SCS/RTP plan does not achieve CARB's GHG reduction targets, then the MPO is required to create an alternative planning strategy (APS) that shows how the targets can be achieved through other mechanism such as alternative development patterns, infrastructure decisions, or other alternative transportation measures or policies that can still achieve CARB's reduction targets. (Gov. Code 5 65080(b)(2)(I).) For this Project, the applicable plan is SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS plan adopted on September 3, 2020. The IS/MND fails to analyze the Project's consistency with SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS plan, outright. But it also fails to adequately analyze consistency with the 2016 plan. For example, SCAG's 2016 RTP/SCS requires or suggests the following that the Project fails to consider or adopt in the IS/MND: City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 18 of 19 • Land Use Policies: pursuing affordable housing or providing more transportation options for short trips;10 • Transportation Network Strategies: providing transit fare discounts; providing transit integration strategies such as integration of active transportation and transit by improving pedestrian access and bicyclist access;" • Transportation Demand Management Strategies: encourage use and implementation of TDM strategies such as rideshare incentives, parking management, parking subsidies for carpoolers, incentives for telecommuting, integrated mobility hubs, or additional investments in active transportation infrastructure;12 and • Clean Vehicle Technology Strategies: use of neighborhood electric vehicles (NEVs), and anticipating shared mobility platforms, car - to -car communication or automated vehicle technologies.13 The IS/MND fails to demonstrate consistency with the most recent SCAG 2020-2045 RTP / SCS and should be revised to meet its goals and policies. IV. CONCLUSION SWRCC requests that the City revise and recirculate the Project's Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, or submit an environmental impact report, to address the aforementioned concerns. If the City has any questions or concerns, feel free to contact my Office. Sincerely, Jason Cohen 10 SCAG (Apr. 2016) 2016 RTP/SCS, pp. 75-114. 11 Id 12 id.. 13 id.. City of Temecula — Rendezvous Phase II Project July 19, 2022 Page 19 of 19 Attorneys for Southwest Regional Council of Carpenters Attachments: March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); and Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C). ON of Temecula Community Development 41000 Main Street • Temecula, CA 92590 Phone (951) 694-6400 • Fax (951) 694-6477 • TemeculaCA.gov August 24, 2022 Ms. Rosemarie M. Anderson Supervising Legal Certification Clerk County of Riverside Post Office Box 751 Riverside, CA 92501-0751 SUBJECT: Filing a Notice of Determination for a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. Dear Ms. Anderson: Enclosed is the Notice of Determination for the above referenced project. In addition, pursuant to Assembly Bill 3158 (Chapter 1706) please find a check in the amount of $2,480.25 for the County Administrative fee to enable the City to file the Notice of Determination for the Negative Declaration. The City of Temecula is paying the $50.00 filing fee under protest. It is the opinion of the City that the administrative fee has been increased in a manner inconsistent with the provisions of State Law. Under Public Resources Code Section 21152 and 14 California Code Regulations 1507, the County is entitled to receive a $25.00 filing fee. Please return a stamped copy of the Notice of Determination within five working days after the 30 day posting in the enclosed self-addressed stamped envelope. Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Scott Cooper at (951) 506- 5137. Sincerely, Luke Watson Deputy City Manager Enclosures: Notice of Determination Form Electronic Payment - Filing Fee Receipt City of Temecula Community Development Planning Division Notice of Determination TO: County Clerk and Recorders Office FROM: Planning Division County of Riverside City of Temecula P.O. Box 751 41000 Main Street Riverside, CA 92501-0751 Temecula, CA 92590 SUBJECT: Filing of a Notice of Determination in compliance with the provisions of Section 21152 of the Public Resources Code State Clearinghouse No.: 2021050549 Project Title: Rendezvous Phase II Apartments Project Project Location: Southwest of Rancho California Road, between Cosmic Drive and Via Las Colinas, County of Riverside Project Description: The project proposes General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5; a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.60 acres; and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 ft west of Cosmic Drive. Project Applicant: Lead Agency: Contact Person: Pacific West Development, 32823 Temecula Parkway A, Temecula, CA 92592 City of Temecula Scott Cooper Telephone Number: (951) 506-5137 This is to advise you that the Planning Commission for the City of Temecula has approved the above described project on August 23, 2022 and has made the following determinations regarding this project: 1. The project will not have a significant effect on the environment. 2. That a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. 3. Mitigation measures were not made a condition of the approval of the project. 4. A Mitigation Monitoring or Reporting Program was not adopted for this project. 5. A Statement of Overriding Consideration was not adopted for this project. 6. Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA. This is to certify that the Negative Declaration with comments, responses, and record of project approval is available to the General Public at the City of Temecula, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California, 92590. Signature: Luke Watson, Deputy City Manager Date received for filing at the County Clerk and Recorders Office: Date: Notice of Public Hearing THE CITY OF TEMECULA 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 A PUBLIC HEARING has been scheduled before the CITY COUNCIL to consider the matter(s) described below. Case No.: PA20-1323, PA20-1324, PA20-1325, PA20-1326 Applicant: Pacific West Development Location: South side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive Proposal: General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M) (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370- 006, 944-370-007, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village) (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-008, 944-370- 010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013); a Development Plan for a 134 unit apartment community built on 7.61 acres (APNs: 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013); and a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel (APNs: 944- 370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-008, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, 944-370-013). Environmental Action: In accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the proposed project will not have a significant impact upon the environment based upon a completed Environmental Initial Study. As a result, a Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with CEQA. PLACE OF HEARING: 41000 Main St., Temecula, CA 92590, City of Temecula, Council Chambers DATE OF HEARING: August 23, 2022 TIME OF HEARING: 6:00 PM �I D K1A RD O CA1 tF OR q r RA�C1i t ti1M% L , �pLINAS L R<{ Project: Site 0 400 800 1,600 Feet Any person may submit written comments to the City Council before the hearing or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the approval of the project at the time of hearing. Any petition for judicial review of a decision of the City Council shall be filed within the time required by, and controlled by, Sections 1094.5 and 1094.6 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In any such action or proceeding seeking judicial review of, which attacks or seeks to set aside, or void any decision of the City Council, shall be limited to those issues raised at the hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at, or prior to, the public hearing described in this notice. The proposed project application may be viewed at the public information counter, Temecula Civic Center, Planning Department, 41000 Main Street, Monday through Friday from 8:00 a.m. until 5:00 p.m. Questions concerning the project(s) may be addressed to Scott Cooper, City of Temecula Planning Department, (951) 506-5137. Item No. 21 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Luke Watson, Director of Community Development DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Community Development Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council receive and file the Community Development Department monthly report. The following are the highlights for Community Development for the month of July 2022. CURRENT PLANNING ACTIVITIES Planning processed twenty-nine (29) new applications (not including Home Occupations) and conducted four (4) Public Hearings in July 2022. A detailed account of planning activities is attached to this report. Planning Statistics July 2022 Long Range Projects 8 Home Occupation 35 Maps 1 Modifications Pre -Application 4 Sign Program Temporary Use Permit 2 Wireless Antenna Facility 3 Zoning or Planning Letter 1 Total 64 Temecula Village Phase II (PAs 20-0323, 20-0324, 20-0325, 20-0326): The City is processing a Development Plan for a 134 unit multi -family community built on 7.61 acres; a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38043) to combine eight (8) existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel; a General Plan Amendment to amend the underlying General Plan Land Use designation of the project site from Professional Office (PO) to Medium Density Residential (M); a Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, (Temecula Village). The City has worked with a consultant to prepare a fiscal impact analysis and with an environmental consultant to prepare and environmental document. The project is located on the south side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. The project is scheduled for City Council on August 23, 2022. (COOPER) Paseo Del Sol Tentative Tract Map No. 36483 (PA14-0087): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (No. 36483) for 168 single-family homes and 11 open space lots located at the northwest corner of Temecula Parkway and Butterfield Stage Road. (COOPER) Sanborn/Jefferson Gas Station (PAs 21-0075, 21-0076): The City is processing a Development Plan and Conditional Use Permit for an approximately 10,000 square foot gas station consisting of 12 fueling pumps, convenience store, quick service restaurant, and multi -tenant retail building located at 41480 Sanborn Avenue. Staff is working with the applicant on the Conditions of Approval for the project. (COOPER) Winchester Hills Development Agreement Amendment (PA21-0128): The City is processing a Second Amendment to the Development Agreement by and between the City of Temecula and Lennar Homes, Inc., a California Corporation and Winchester Hills I LLC, a California Limited Liability Company to rescind the First Amendment to the Development Agreement and reinstate the original term of the Development Agreement for the Winchester Property located within portions of Planning Area 12 of the Harveston Specific Plan. (COOPER) Firenze (PA21-1023): The City is processing a Development Plan application for an approximately 498,557 square foot hotel and apartment project. The approximately 148,545 square foot, five story, 224 room hotel includes a conference center, restaurant, wine market multi -tenant space, and outdoor courtyard dining space. The approximately 350,012 square foot, seven story, 121-unit apartment building include a roof top area that contains a pool/spa, cabanas, fire pit, media wall, kitchen, fitness area, and lawn/game area. The parking for the project is located on the interior of the apartment building that is wrapped with the residential units. The project is located approximately 665 feet north of Rancho California Road on the east side of Jefferson Avenue. (COOPER) MS Mountain View Phase V (PAs 22-0593, 22-0594, 22-0595): The City is processing three (3) Development Plan applications for industrial buildings of 21,793 square feet, 11,369 square feet, and 22,769 square feet located along Avenida Alvarado. (COOPER) Jefferson/Buecking Apartments (PA21-1454): The City is processing a Development Plan application for a 260-unit apartment community located on the north and south side of Buecking Drive at the Jefferson Avenue intersection. Staff is working with the applicant on the Conditions of Approval for the project. (COOPER) Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan Update (PA21-1525): The City is processing a Modification to the previously approved Temecula Valley Hospital Master Plan. The updated Master Plan, at buildout will include the existing 237,305 square foot hospital building and 5,180 square foot storage building along with an approximately 130,000 square foot, four story Behavioral Health Building in Phase 2, an approximately 10,000 square foot expansion to the emergency department, a 125,000 square foot, five story second hospital tower, a 80,000 square foot medical office buildings, and a 14,000 square foot utility plant in Phase 3, and an approximately 125,000 square foot, five story third hospital tower, a 80,000 square three story foot medical office building, and a four story parking structure with the existing helipad relocated to the roof of the structure in Phase 4. The project is located at 31700 Temecula Parkway. A public scoping meeting for the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) was held on March 23, 2022, at the Ronald H. Roberts Library. The Draft SEIR was provided to staff for review. (COOPER) Temecula Resort and Spa (PAs 22-0035, 22-0037): The City is processing a Development Plan and Tentative Parcel Map for an approximately 474,137 square foot, seven (7) story, 90-foot high full service hotel that includes a parking garage, conference facilities/ballrooms, gallery/event space, full service spa, restaurants, bars/lounges, retail outlets, workout facility, outdoor pool area, and a wedding garden located on the east side of Front Street between 1st Street and 2nd Street. The project was presented to the City Council Old Town Steering Committee on July 26th, 2022. (COOPER) Temecula Hyundai (PA22-0293): The City is processing a Modification to a Development Plan for the addition of approximately 3,824 square feet to the vehicle showroom and service area, a new approximately 674 square foot vehicle delivery canopy area, elevation revisions to adhere to new corporate colors, and a new vehicle display pad at the entry driveway located at 27430 Ynez Road. (COOPER) Sommers Bend SHAWOOD Home Product Review (PAs 22-0494, 0495, 0496): The City is Processing Home Product Reviews for Planning Area's 19, 20B, and 21 of Sommers Bend. There are a total of 57 homes ranging in size from 3,203 square feet to 4,974 square feet with three (3) different architectural styles. Home Product Review for these planning areas was previously approved on June 2, 2021. The applicant is proposing new architectural styles with new construction techniques for these larger homes. (COOPER) Arrive @ Rancho Highlands (PA22-0650): The City is processing a Modification to previously approved Development Plan (PA19-1448) for the reduction of 23 market rate units, relocation of Buildings 3, 4, and 5, and provide new architecture for Building 4. The previously approved 55 affordable units remain as part of this modification. The modification to the site is required due to the discovery of a fault line during grading activities in the location of previously approved buildings. The project is located adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond approximately 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road. (COOPER) Seraphina Tentative Tract Map No. 38267 (PA22-0830): The City is processing a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38267) for the creation of 39 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 12.77 acres located on the southwest corner of Joseph Road and Rita Way (APN: 957-080-027). (COOPER) LONG RANGE PLANNING General Plan Update The Long Range Planning Division has developed a four -phase, multi -year process to update the General Plan. Phase I is complete and included updates to Housing and Public Safety Elements. Phase I also included an update to the City's Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines to analyze Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) for the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Phase II is in process and includes an update to the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP), reconciling the City's GIS Maps on a parcel by parcel basis, a baseline EIR analysis of the City's Circulation Element, and developing a Complete Streets Policy document. Phase III will include a Fiscal Land Use Study to analyze the City's remaining development capacity and market absorption potential for residential, commercial, and industrial development. The final phase is to work with a General Plan Advisory Committee to update to the General Plan and EIR over an 18-month timeframe. (PETERS) Quality of Life Master Plan Update: On April 27, 2021, the City Council established a Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC) to update the Quality of Life Master Plan (QLMP). The QLMP identifies the City's six core values, including: 1) Healthy and Livable City; 2) Economic Prosperity; 3) Safe and Prepared Community; 4) Sustainable City; 5) Transportation Mobility and Connectivity; and 6) Accountable and Responsive City Government. Projects and programs proposed in the City's Annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvements Program must be consistent with the City's Core Values. Performance measures (indicators) are measured annually to track progress and the completion of goals and objectives. The last BRC meeting is scheduled for July 21, 2022. The Preliminary Draft document will be presented to all Boards and Commissions in August and September. The Final Draft QLMP is tentatively scheduled for the September 27, 2022, City Council meeting. (PETERS) Permit Ready ADU Program (LR19-1464): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare, adopt, and implement a Permit Ready Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) program. The ADU program will encourage the construction of ADUs, offering property owners a selection of pre -approved ADU building plans that can be obtained at the Community Development Department, free of charge. On September 16, 2020, the RFP closed on PlanetBids. The City received three detailed proposals from qualified consultants. After detailed review of all the proposals, staff selected checkerboardSTUDIOS Consultant Firm. On March 18, 2021, staff kicked off the project with the Consultant and staff from Planning, Building & Safety, Public Works, and Fire. This will be a joined effort between the internal departments and the consultant. Staff is working with the consultant on the first task (Phase 1: Schematic Design), staff has provided feedback of the Schematic Design taking into consideration the School District and Development Impact Fee (DIF) fees, and appropriate unit type and size. On, October 19, 2021, staff presented at the draft site plan and architecture designs to the Southern Riverside County Association of Realtors (SRCAR). On November 30, 2021, staff held an Open House to solicit feedback from the professional community (i.e., Engineers, Contractors, Architects, etc.), the meeting will be open to the public. Staff is currently reviewing the construction drawings. (RABIDOU) Uptown Temecula Specific Plan Amendment (LR19-1458): An amendment to the Uptown Specific Plan to implement the following changes: modify graphics to reflect consistency with text regarding allowable frontage types, amend street cross sections (graphics), amend plant pallet and Silva cell requirements for street trees, implement a street naming convention, amend streetlight spacing and other typographical errors. A meeting to discuss the street cross sections is scheduled for 8/11/2022. (COLLINS) Transportation Discovery and Existing Conditions Analysis (LR20-1071): The City received an SB 2 Grant from the State Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) to prepare an internal document for staff to identify potential transportation focused areas as part of Phase 2 of our General Plan Update process and timeline. The City has hired Fehr & Peers (F&P) to document existing transportation conditions in the City, provide benchmarking information on how transportation facilities, transportation use and policies compares to other peer agencies (through benchmarking) and will evaluate how much of the current Circulation Element has been implemented. Staff worked with F&P to identify methodology, thresholds, and mitigation to address VMT for the California Environmental Quality Act evaluation, which the City Council adopted in May 2020. On July 19, 2021, Staff has a scheduled internal meeting with Fehr & Peers, they present to staff the Data Collection Status. Currently, the consultant is developing the three scenario runs to be reviewed by staff prior to conducting a full model run. (PETERS) Mobile Food Trucks (LR20-1472): On February 23, 2021, staff presented to the Economic Development Subcommittee members (ME/JS) on Mobile Food Trucks (MFT). This was a noticed meeting with one public comment in favor of MFT, read by Stuart Fisk. The intent of the meeting was to get the subcommittee's feedback on the potential for MFT to operate in the City. Staff presented the definition of MFTs, existing regulations, standards of operation to consider, and Pros & Cons list. The subcommittee advised staff to create a framework and come back to the committee for discussion. Staff is working on developing the framework. Staff took the draft to Community Development Brainstorming Meeting on May 4, 2022, for review. Revisions necessary. (COLLINS) Shopping Cart Ordinance (LR21-0909): An ordinance to modify Title 9 Public Peace, Morals and Welfare of the Temecula Municipal Code to regulate shopping carts. Shopping carts continue to be left throughout the City, costing taxpayers and businesses money to retrieve, repair or replace these carts. The ordinance proposes mandatory physical measures for all retailers with shopping carts, exemptions provided for, exemptions are invalid for retailers whose carts are found more than 3 times in a 12-month period. Staff presented the draft ordinance to the City Council Public Safety Subcommittee on January 18, 2022 (Rahn, Edwards), direction to staff was to conduct more outreach to businesses, chamber of commerce as well as to present the ordinance to the Planning Commission Commercial Center Subcommittee. Staff hand delivered 82 letters to all businesses within the City, presented the draft ordinance to the Temecula Valley Chamber of Commerce on January 11, 2022, and presented to Planning Commission Commercial Center Subcommittee on February 16, 2022 (Turley-Trejo, Watts). Commissioners were supportive of the ordinance, recommended the framing be as a responsibility and not assign blame. Staff was requested to present again to the Subcommittee's to show outreach efforts and report feedback. The Shopping Cart Ordinance (Pt read) was passed on July 12th, 2022, staff will follow up with another in person visit with code enforcement in early September to further explain the requirements and timeframes for implementing theft prevention measures. (COLLINS) Temecula Creek Wildfire Risk Reduction Community Plan (LR21-1331): Temecula applied for and was awarded a $300,000 grant to develop Temecula's first Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP). The grant has a $78,000 match (staff time), the remainder is to onboard a consultant to draft the plan. RFP has closed and review of submissions is in progress. (COLLINS) Municipal Code Update (LR22-0182): An update to the Temecula Municipal Code Title 5 and 17. Updates to Title 5 are limited to clarification for exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 5.22 Massage Establishments specific to chair massage and specifies limits to existing exemptions. Updates to Title 17 include changes to the separate conveyance of Accessory Dwelling Units IAW AB 345. Additionally, ADU's would require all equipment (including window AC units) to be screened from the R-O-W and update the definition of guest house and secondary dwelling unit. Update PDO-4 & PDO-10 to require restaurants that provide live entertainment comply with Chapter 9.10 Live entertainment License. (COLLINS) WRCOG REAP Agreement (LR22-0664): An agreement between WRCOG and the City to provide consultation services to provide analysis of required municipal code updates as they relate to the new slate of housing laws, such as SB-9, ADU Laws, etc. The cost is included as a benefit to member agencies of WRCOG. (COLLINS) HOUSING Las Haciendas Affordable Housing Project: The City is processing a Development Plan for a 77-unit affordable multi -family housing community consisting of two residential buildings, a community building and tuck -under parking located at 28715 Las Haciendas. The City Council approved a Loan Agreement with Community Housing Works (CHW) for the use of affordable housing tax allocation bond proceeds on May 26, 2020. The developer held a virtual community workshop on July 28, 2020. The item was approved by the Planning Commission on October 7, 2020. An amendment to the Loan Agreement was approved at the April 27, 2021, City Council meeting. A tax allocation application was forwarded to the state in March 2021. The applicant has submitted Building Permits and Grading Permits. CHW was awarded tax credits in June 2021. The project is under construction. (RABIDOU, WATSON) Vine Creek Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA): City Council approved the DDA with Temecula Pacific Associates on June 25, 2019, for the development of 60 affordable units on City -owned property on Pujol Street. The developer is looking to secure financing from the State of California prior to construction. The City and developer will collaborate with the County of Riverside and the State Department of Housing and Community Development for additional funding opportunities through the Permanent Local Housing Allocation grant. The project has received state tax credits as of June 2022. The applicant is moving forward with the project based on this additional funding. (WATSON) Housing Element Update (LR18-1620): The City is working with De Novo Planning Group to update the 2021-29 Housing Element. De Novo will also assist with the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) process, community engagement, and California Environmental Quality Act. The current Housing Element was certified by the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) in 2013 and serves as the foundation for the update. The Housing Element is a required part of the City's General Plan and is a blueprint for meeting the housing needs of residents, at all economic levels, and addressing segments of the population with special needs. The City Council General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Council Member Edwards and Mayor Rahn, and the Planning Commission General Plan Ad Hoc Subcommittee, consisting of Commissioners Watts and Turley-Trejo, will serve as advisory bodies. Running concurrently with the Housing Element Update is the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). The RHNA planning cycle is an eight -year cycle and covers October 2021 through October 2029. The Final RHNA allocation was issued in September 2020. Staff is working with the consultant to update data and write draft chapters. A Housing Workshop was held on August 17, 2021, with approximately 12 attendees. The item was recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission at the September 15, 2021, Planning Commission meeting. The Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission (ALUC) and California Board of Forestry and Fire Protection have signed -off on the Housing Element. The item was approved by the City Council on October 12, 2021. The City Council adopted the revised Housing Element on February 8, 2022. Staff has submitted an informal set of changes to HCD. (RABIDOU) BUILDING & SAFETY Building and Safety statistics for July 2022 are highlighted in the following table. Building& Safety Stati cs J* = Permits 481 Derv- Single Family Units i 11 Nmy. Commercial Buildingy 5 Photovoltaic Tenant Improvements 12 Non Construction C of O Dumber of Active Plan Checks 131 Number of New Plan Checks ' 87 Dumber ofFinaled Permits 268 Inspections 2.651 Iuspettians Per Ira-,- 126.24 Inspections Per Person Per Day 25.25 Stops Per Month 782 Visitors to Counter 845 New Construction Projects Currently in Plan Check ❑ Truax Hotel (161,586 SF) ❑ Parking Structure on 3rd Street (48,907 SF) ❑ Generations at Linfield - memory care/assisted living (59 apartments and 32 condos) ❑ Hotel (38,202 SF) on Jefferson and Winchester ❑ Hotel Curio (72,486 SF with 31,808 SF basement Parking) 41h Street ❑ Solana Way Senior Assisted Living and Memory Care (72,882 SF) ❑ Temecula Hyundai Service Building (5,753 SF) ❑ New Industrial Building (32,792 SF) ❑ New Margarita Recreation Center (8,161 SF) ❑ Nine (9) Industrial Buildings — Mountain View (219,609 SF total) ❑ Longhorn Steakhouse (5,710 SF) (old Marie Callendar's location) Non -Construction Certificate of Occupancy ❑ The Urban Island Restaurant (2,600 SF) ❑ Live Well Family Counseling (2,234 SF) Tenant Improvement ❑ Dave's Hot Chicken (1,924 SF) ❑ Boba Time (819 SF) CODE ENFORCEMENT During the month July, Code Enforcement responded to 118 web inquiries. In addition, the division opened 112 code cases, conducted 161 regular inspections, conducted 21 weed abatement inspections, and forwarded 43 referrals. Code Enforcement Statistics _abandoned or Inoperable vehicle 6 Vacant Home } Prop_ Maintenance lInfestationl Business or Home Occupation w. o license. CLIP 4 Trash and Debris Dumping Overgrown Vezetation . %�-eeds . Fire Hazard 16 Green Pool/ erector Control . Stagnari eater Graffiti 13 Nuisance,'Animal Control x . RV Stored. Boat. Parking 4 tnmtion w o Permit;-Buildimg Code 9 )ach Public ROW. Trash Cans 16 ig Signs 9 c Safety & Health 0 Number of Cases 112 Foreclosure Tracking: Code Enforcement works with the local real estate community to monitor foreclosures, defaults and real estate owned properties. Foreclosure Statistics July 2022 Residential - Default 36 Residential - Foreclosure 13 Residential- REO 13 Total - Residential 64 Commercial - Default 1 Commercial - Foreclosure 0 Commercial - RED 1 Total - Commercial 2 ATTACHMENT: Current Planning Activity Report PLANNING ACTIVITY REPORT Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0736 41980 Winchester Rd 909-310-072 Jaime Cardenas 07/01/2022 Steve Hong Exeter 41980 PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Winchester Rd. Case Title / Description: 41980 Winchester Industrial Paint MOD: a Modification Application to repaint a vacant industrial building located at 41980 Winchester Road. PA22-0737 32435 Temecula Pky 960-020-060 Jaime Cardenas 07/01/2022 Tiffany Del Gatto DMSD PROP PL Sign Program Corrections Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Wolf Store Retail Park #76 Amendment: a Sign Program Amendment application to modify the Wolf Store Retail Park Sign Program to accommodate new signs for Better Buzz located at 32435 Temecula Parkway PA22-0744 41918 4Th St 922-034-019 Scott Cooper 07/05/2022 07/27/2022 Matt Liesemeyer TV Old Town LP PL Temporary Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Use Permit Case Title / Description: 4th St. Hotel TUP: ATemporary Use Permit for a construction yard for building material storage for a period of six months located approximately 50 feet southwest of Mercedes Street on the south side of 4th Street PA22-0763 32085 Temecula Pky 960-010-043 Jaime Cardenas 07/11/2022 07/12/2022 Mike Heffernan REDHAWK PL Sign Program Approved Temecula, CA 92592 TOWNE CENTERII Case Title / Description: Red Hawk Town Center (#77) Sign Program Amendment: a Sign Program Amendment application to add an additional sign area at the existing Kohl's for a future Sephora located at 32085 Temecula Parkway PA22-0768 32549 Guevara Dr 959-322-008 Parker De Klotz 07/12/2022 07/14/2022 Francis Asuncion 5F&M LLC PL Zoning or Completed Temecula, CA 92592 Planning Letter Case Title / Description: 32549 Guevara Dr. ZL: A Zoning Verification Letter for the property located at 32549 Guevara Drive PA22-0774 41520 Margarita Rd 954-020-005 Parker De Klotz 07/13/2022 Crown Castle Crown Castle Justin Davis PL Wireless Corrections Temecula, CA 92592 Antenna Facility Case Title / Description: Rancho Water Crown Castle Modification WTF: a Wireless Telecommunication Facility application to relocate (6) antenna to (3) dual antenna mount, Install (3) anntenas, and relocate (3) RRUs to the existing monopine tower at the Rancho Water facility located at 41520 Margarita. Page 1 of 4 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0793 45640 Jeronimo St 918-323-008 Jaime Cardenas 07/15/2022 Andrew Nunez PL Modifications Corrections Temecula, CA 92592 Case Title / Description: Gorman Addition MOD: a Modification Application for the a 180 square foot room addition to the existing single-family home located at 45640 Jeronimo Street. PA22-0798 32240 Temecula Pky 959-410-012 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2022 07/19/2022 Deanna Lynn Lahaina Partners PL Wireless Approved Temecula, CA 92592 Antenna Facility Case Title / Description: 32240 Temecula Pkwy Tower MOD: A Wireless Telecommunication Facility to remove and install new antennas and equipment including new antennas, RRUs, new dormer vents, and other miscellaneous equipment for 5G technology to the existing wireless tower located at 32240 Temecula Parkway. PA22-0799 29640 Solana Way 921-330-056 Scott Cooper 07/18/2022 Mike Adams Temecula, CA 92591 Case Title / Description: Solana Assisted Living Construction Trailer TUP: A Temporary Use Permit to allow for a temporary construction trailer on site throughout the construction of the Solana Assisted Living project Temecula RCFE PL Temporary Plan Review Group, LLC Use Permit PA22-0801 42613 Avenida Alvarado 909-290-079 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2022 07/25/2022 Mario Calvillo PL Modifications Approved Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: MS Mountainview Bldg 4 Sidewalk MOD: a Modification Applications (Planning Review Only) to allow for the rerouting of a walkway from the building to the public right-of-way. The project site is located at 42613 Avenida Alvarado. PA22-0802 29775 Santiago Rd 922-130-019 Jaime Cardenas 07/18/2022 07/19/2022 Jessica Grevin RANCHO PL Wireless Approved Temecula, CA 92592 BAPTIST Antenna Facility CHURCH Case Title / Description: 29775 Santiago AT&T WTF: a Modification Application for AT&T to remove and replace 6 antennas, add 3 new AIR antennas and new miscellaneous equipment to the existing monopine located at 29775 Santiago Road. PA22-0803 33205 Temecula Pky 960-030-018 Scott Cooper 07/18/2022 John Dvorak Garfield Beach PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92592 CVS LLC Case Title / Description: Market Place @ Vail Ranch Landscape MOD: A 17,400 square foot drought tolerant landscape Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) for Market Place @ Vail Ranch PA22-0804 28715 Las Haciendas St 921-050-029 Brandon Rabidou 07/19/2022 07/19/2022 Rosalind Ross Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: Las Haciendas MOD: A Minor Modification (Planning Review Only) to alter the parapet heights of the previously approved Development Plan (PA20-0345) located at 28715 LAS HACIENDAS ST Las Haciendas PL Modifications Approved Housing Associates, L.P. Page 2 of 4 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PA22-0808 28115 Del Rio Rd 921-060-022 Parker De Klotz 07/20/2022 Lindsey Sands Gertrude LLC PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92590 Case Title / Description: TLC Landscaping MOD: A Modification Application to turn a vacant lot located at 28115 Del Rio Rd. into an outdoor building materials storage facility PA22-0817 31300 Rancho Community 959-070-018 07/21/2022 Moises Villegas RANCHO PL Modifications Plan Review Way COMMUNITY Temecula, CA 92592 REFORMED CHURCH Case Title / Description: Rancho Community Church Workshop MOD: A Modification to the campus building square footage changing the 1,950 square foot storage building to a workshop located at 31300 Rancho Community Way PA22-0828 40575 Winchester Rd 910-290-010 Jaime Cardenas 07/25/2022 Jacob Webster Velo Corinthians PL Modifications Plan Review Temecula, CA 92591 LTD Partnership Case Title / Description: Krispy Kreme MOD: a modification application for facade alterations to the existing restaurant and drive through for a future Krispy Kreme located at 40575 Winchester Road. PA22-0830 957-080-027 Scott Cooper 07/26/2022 NANCY LEAMAN Rick Schroeder PL Maps Plan Review Temecula, CA Case Title / Description: Seraph ina TTM 38267: A Tentative Tract Map (TTM 38267) for the creation of 39 single family lots and 2 open space lots on 12.77 acres located on the southwest corner of Joseph Road and Rita Way (APN: 957-080-027) PREAPP22-0 26155 Ynez Rd 910-271-002 Scott Cooper 07/14/2022 Craig Miers Craig Miers + PL Out 785 Temecula, CA 92591 George Scott Pre -Application Architects, lip Case Title / Description: Open Roads RV Storage Pre-App: A Pre -Application for a RV and Boat Storage facility consisting of a managers office and 512 spaces located on Ynez Road at the terminus of County Center Drive PREAPP22-0 945-120-004 Eric Jones 07/22/2022 Mike Mahmoudi PL Plan Review 822 Temecula, CA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Tentative Tract Map Pre -Application: A Pre -Application to review the creation of 6 from one. The project is generally located on the southwest corner of Santiago Road and John Warner Road (APN 954-120-004). Page 3 of 4 Assigned Planner Approval PA Number Project Address APN Apply Date Date Applicant Company Owner Plan Type Status PREAPP22-0 39540 Winchester Rd 920-100-040 Jaime Cardenas 07/25/2022 Melissa Beeler LIPT PL Plan Review 826 Temecula, CA 92591 WINCHESTER Pre -Application ROAD INC Case Title / Description: Archibald's Drive Thru Preapp MOD: a Pre -Application to review the minor alterations to the existing building and drive through located at 39540 Winchester Road. PREAPP22-0 921-281-014 Jaime Cardenas 07/29/2022 Mike Bareh PL Plan Review 847 Temecula, CA Pre -Application Case Title / Description: Small Steps Industrial Building: a Pre -Application for the review of a proposed 8,000 SF industrial building on the vacant property with APN 921-281-014. Page 4 of 4 Item No. 22 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: John Crater, Division Chief DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Fire Department Monthly Report PREPARED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Report Wendy Miller, Management Analyst That the City Council receive and file the Fire Department Monthly City of TFire Department Temecula Fire Department Service Calls Incident Type July 2022 Commercial Fire 0 • » N r False Alarms 68 • # 5k+loon- - Haz Mat 3 i • • r' 4. • is.li N N -� �'k ecx U., • • • r • I Medical 649 ` des b: = Multi -Faro 0 r, 1" •,�`"tea ,&y 19$9 . NFw Other Fire 8 s ' •t4 low41 • • " : • r� '*; �� 1 p,. a Other Mlsc 5'���,� yF, . • • ' • • �' :! L-L,41 'ia:om' < <°i+ , a=�w��z! ! .�.,� a:,s�aklon6s, b Public Assist 42 e` r:: , � ..yr o � ,.�� _ •r�� .� s • ; • Pa u6 A A L L r Y i Are mAg c ry5 • - Residential Fire 1N=' '.�J f� t r , _ ; • '•. aL,•px rr��^ • Rescue 5 .« ,,,�� , ,+.. �, • .. AV -01 Ringing Alarm 5 ���� o rc �' 1�511• .i• • «ot ••• C'•n ,.,� • l y` , h.,n'A• • ,1j H.;.I+ -• Se. Pµa - Standby 6 S' '°�,r ` Yy. • • � * s • � Traffic Collision 52 �Q ! PECHANGACASI�'JW�RY ' .!� - 1 n hi 1 F' Wilda d/Ve c e Fire 8 Total 852 City of Temecula Fire Department Temecula Fire Department Plan Review and Inspections July 2022 �116 0481959/y i1 Plan Review and Inspections Plan Review Construction Inspections Annual Inspections Counter/Public Inquiries Year to Date 3382 2600 4010 227 0-1 Item No. 23 CITY OF TEMECULA AGENDA REPORT TO: City Manager/City Council FROM: Patrick Thomas, Director of Public Works/City Engineer DATE: August 23, 2022 SUBJECT: Public Works Department Monthly Report RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the Public Works Department Monthly Report for Capital Improvement Projects, Maintenance Projects, and Land Development Projects. This report may also be viewed on the City's website at: hlt2://temeculaca.gov/270/Cqpital-improvement-Projects-CIP City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS CIRCULATION PROJECTS Cherry Street Extension & Murrieta Creek Crossing, PW19-15 Description: Preliminary design of the Extension of Cherry Street from Adams Avenue to Diaz Road, including a new crossing of Murrieta Creek. Cost: $37,248,262 Status: The City received 30% plans for a low flow crossing. Environmental agencies have stated that a low -flow crossing is a non -starter. Design consultant is preparing a bridge planning study. Diaz Road Expansion, PW17-25 Description Improve Diaz Road to meet the roadway classification of Major Arterial (4 Lanes Divided), between Cherry Street and Rancho California Road. The 2.2-mile stretch will be widened, extended, and/or improved to create a contiguous Major Arterial segment. The project will be developed and constructed in two phases. Phase 1 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Winchester Road to Rancho California Road. Phase 2 will include improvements on Diaz Road from Cherry Street to Winchester Road. Cost: $14,255,991 Status: Phase 1 design, Phase 1 & 2 environmental studies, and Phase 1 permitting November 2019 — January 2023. The Initial Study has been approved, Mitigated Negative Declaration adopted, and Notice of Determination filed in May 2022. Design is 90% complete. Regulatory permit applications have been submitted for USACoE 404 Nationwide Permit and CDFW Streambed Alteration 1602. Current activities include consultant review of 90% plan check comments, design coordination with utility purveyors (SCE, RCWD, and EMWD) and City project PW16-05 Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, Riverside County Flood Control review of 90% design plans and Encroachment Permit application, and preparation of regulatory permit applications for SWRCB 401 Water Quality Certification and USACoE Section 408. French Valley Parkway/Interstate 15 Improvements- Phase II, PW16-01 Description: Design and construction of the two-lane northbound collector/distributer road system beginning north of the Winchester Road interchange on -ramps and ending just north of the Interstate 15/Interstate 215 junction with connection to Interstate 15 and Interstate 215. Cost: $138,736,346 Status: Design and environmental revalidation is complete. Right of way acquisition process is nearly complete. Requests for funding authorization/obligation are being processed. A Request for Proposals (RFP 270) is advertising August 3 through September 1, 2022. Pending authorization/obligation of funds, the Construction Contract will be advertised in August/September. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) 1-15 Congestion Relief, PW19-02 Description Design and construction of a single auxiliary lane, northbound Interstate 15 connecting the Temecula Parkway on -ramp to the Rancho California Road off -ramp. Cost: $8,971,710 Status: Design and environmental studies November 2019 — September 2022. Current activities include City revision of 95% Roadway and Structures PSE, Storm Water Data Report, Drainage Report, and Permit Engineering Evaluation Report. Caltrans has tentatively approved the CEQA Categorical Exemption, however a revalidation has been deemed necessary. The Notice of Determination will be filed upon project approval under the Permit Engineering Evaluation Report. Murrieta Creek Bridge at Overland Drive, PW16-05 Description: Design and construction of a new bridge crossing over Murrieta Creek between Rancho California Road and Winchester Road. Cost: $26,073,374 Status: The City applied and was approved to receive Federal Highway Bridge Program (HBP) funds. City Council approved the design agreement with CNS Engineers Inc. at the March 12, 2019, meeting. Preliminary Environmental Study (PES) approved by Caltrans on August 15, 2019. Plans are 30% complete. RCA JPR Conformance is approved. NEPA approval is anticipated in Summer of 2022, Caltrans review time has been longer than anticipated. Biological monitoring in Temecula Creek for potential mitigation site is complete as of July 2021. Project has received MSHCP conformance. Staff continues to work with Caltrans to advance HBP Grant Funds to earlier fiscal years. Caltrans HBP Program management had proposed reducing the curb -to -curb width of the bridge that is considered "participating" for grant funding purposes. Staff has been able to address this issue with Caltrans and the majority of the bridge width will remain as a participating cost. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 CIRCULATION PROJECTS (Continued) Overland Drive Widening, PW 20-11 Description This project includes widening Overland Drive from Jefferson Avenue to Commerce Center Drive, to two lanes in each direction, and the completion of missing segments of sidewalk, streetlights, and installation of the traffic signal at Commerce Center Drive and the modification of the traffic signal at Jefferson Avenue. Cost: $2,894,420 Status: The Design Consultant submitted 60% submittal package in mid -July. Traffic Signal Installation — Citywide, Rancho California Road and Tee Drive, PW19-19 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Rancho California Road at Tee Drive. Cost: $448,045.00 Status: Construction contract was awarded by City Council on August 9, 2022. Traffic Signal and Park & Ride Access Improvements, PW18-11 Description: This project includes the installation of a traffic signal on Temecula Parkway at Wabash Lane. The project also includes relocating the access to the Park and Ride facility on Temecula Parkway at La Paz Road from Vallejo Avenue to Wabash Lane. Cost: $1,347,674 Status: The traffic signal and the new access road to the Park and Ride are fully operational. Access to Park and Ride from Vallejo Ave. has been closed and a permanent block wall will be constructed in the next few weeks. Construction completion is anticipated in August of 2022. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS Bike and Trail Program — Great Oak Trail Lighting Description: Project includes the installation of solar lights along the Great Oak Trail adjacent to the northeast side of Pechanga Parkway from Deer Hollow Way to Loma Linda Road. Cost: $400,000 Status: Project is currently in design. Citywide Drainage Master Plan Description: Project will prepare a report that shows all drainage courses within the City. Also includes a master hydrology study showing the anticipated storm flows at build -out. Cost: $600,000 Status: Kickoff meeting was on June 30, 2022. Project is anticipated to last for one year. Community Recreation Center (CRC) Renovations, PW19-07 Description: The project facilitates the rehabilitation, improvement, and reconfiguration of the Community Recreation Center. This project includes expansion and reconfiguration of teen center; conversion of office space to accommodate a dedicated police substation; renovation of key components of the building including safety features, flooring, roof, and restroom facility access; ADA compliance; renovation and expansion of existing office space and rec rooms including AV upgrades; expanded storage space and upgraded kitchen equipment. Cost: $10,708,232 Status: Phase 1 design is progressing. City Council Authorization to bid was received on 7/12/2022. 4 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Interstate 15 / State Route 79 South Interchange Enhanced Landscaping, PW17-19 Description: Landscape beautification of the Interstate 15 corridor between French Valley Parkway and Temecula Parkway, including each interchange, in association with Visit Temecula Valley and the Pechanga Tribe. This project includes the design and construction of enhanced landscaping, hardscape, and irrigation between the freeway and ramps on the west side of the Interstate 15 / State Route 79S (Temecula Parkway) interchange. Cost: $3,58,483 Status: Design and environmental studies August 2019 — October 2022. Environmental revalidation completed October 2020. Current activities include 90% design plans, design of new power and irrigation water service, and Design Engineering Evaluation Report. Margarita Recreation Center, PW17-21 Description: Demolition and Reconstruction of New Margarita Recreation Center Building and Pool Cost: $12,601,508 Status: RFP responses were received on August 27, 2020. The project was re -advertised on November 25, 2020, to account for increased project budget and proposals were received on December 23, 2020. The Design - Build Contract was awarded at the March 9, 2021, City Council Meeting to De La Secura Builders, Inc., for a Guaranteed Maximum Price of $8,680,459.00. Design phase is well underway. The second building plan review was completed on January 25, 2022, and the Design Builder is working to address comments. The existing MRC building was vacated by City Staff and all salvageable equipment removed on January 28, 2022. The Fire Department used the existing building for training the week of February 7, 2022. The demolition of the existing MRC building started on February 14, 2022. Major demolition activities commenced mid -March. City Groundbreaking occurred on March 31, 2022. Building footings have been poured. Foundation is expected to be complete mid -August with framing to start immediately afterward. It is anticipated building construction will be complete in spring 2023 with a grand opening in Summer 2023. Mary Phillips Senior Center Enhancement and Renovation, PW20-13 Description: The project includes the enhancement and renovation of the Mary Phillips Senior Center. Work includes new exterior siding, painting, replacement of perimeter soffits, fascia boards, eaves, and select doors & windows. Cost: $1,262,025 Status: Construction bids were opened on August 4, 2022. Staff is conducting the bid analysis. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Santa Gertrudis Creek Pedestrian/Bicycle Trail Extension and Interconnect, PW08-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the extension of the existing trail from Ynez Road to the Murrieta Creek Trail. The extension includes access and under -crossing at Ynez Road, Interstate 15 and Jefferson Avenue and a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek to connect to Murrieta Creek trail. Cost: $7,173,595 Status: The California Transportation Commission (CTC) has approved $3,759,000 State S131 Alternative Transportation Program (ATP) Augmentation funds for this project. The Notice to Proceed for construction was issued to the contractor with a work start date of April 19, 2021. Groundbreaking event occurred on May 4, 2021. Jefferson undercrossing section is complete. Ynez undercrossing section is complete. Asphalt for entire trail is complete. Tieback wall section under 1-15 section is complete. Contractor is currently working on wall and concrete trail sections under 1-15. Completion is anticipated in September 2022. The current concrete shortage has significantly extended the completion date as most of the remaining work requires concrete. October 1, 2022 is anticipated grand opening date. Santa Gertrudis Creek Phase II — Margarita Under -Crossing, PW19-04 Description: Design, environmental document, and construction of the undercrossing in Santa Gertrudis Creek at Margarita Road to connect to the pedestrian/bicycle trail. The under -crossing at Margarita Road will provide a continuous paved trail along Santa Gertrudis Creek at this location. Cost: $2,716,764 Status: The project is in design. 100% Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (PSE) expected in December 2022. Sidewalks — Citywide (Ynez Road, Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road), PW17-28 Description: New sidewalks on the west side of Ynez Road from Rancho Highland to Tierra Vista Road. Cost: $198,920 Status: ADA Access Ramps have to be revised. The project is scheduled to be advertised for construction bids in September 2022. N. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS (Continued) Sidewalks — DLR Drive, PW19-18 Description: New sidewalks on the north and west side of DLR Drive. Cost: $464,866 Status: Currently in construction. Construction completion is scheduled in August. Sidewalks — Citywide (Pauba Road, Elinda Road to Showalter Road), PW 19-20 Description: New sidewalks and street widening on the South side of Pauba Road from Elinda Road to Showalter Road. Cost: $467,403 Status: Project is currently in design. Fire Station 84 Renovation, PW19-14 Description: This project includes the design, construction, and renovation to Fire Station 84. The renovations include, adding a Wellness Room, expanding the Storage Room, and upgrading the Training Room. Also, the upgrades include, electrical, windows, flooring, paint, tile, HVAC, cabinets, plumbing fixtures, garage bay doors and any necessary improvements needed to conform to ADA accessibility access. Cost: $1,641,028 Status: Advertisement for construction bids was cancelled. Contract documents are under revision and project will be re -advertised. Pavement Management Program — Meadowview/Paloma Del Sol, PW21-06 Description: Pavement rehabilitation project on various internal streets in the Meadowview Community as well as Amarita Way, Montelegro Way, and Santiago Road in Paloma Del Sol. Pavement rehabilitation includes an asphalt leveling course, asphalt rubber aggregate membrane (ARAM), and slurry seal. Replacement of existing pedestrian ramps and restriping is also included in the project. Cost: $4,732,266.70 Status: Construction contract was awarded at the July 26, 2022 City Council Meeting. Construction to start August 15, 2022 and is anticipated to be completed in December of 2022. City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 PARKS AND RECREATION PROJECTS Flood Control Channel Reconstruction and Repair, PW11-10 Description: This project repairs and reinforces the earth and berms between Pala Park and Temecula Creek and fortifies the banks to prevent further erosion into the park site. Cost: $1,280,284 Status: Construction was completed on March 20, 2022. Final project acceptance is anticipated in August 2022. Park Restroom Renovations, Expansion and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), PW17-06 Description: Renovation of various park site restroom facilities, including Ronald Reagan Sports Park North/South Ball Field (new roof, cabinets, fixtures, and other building improvements), Vail Ranch Park and Long Canyon Creek Park. Cost: $1,127,800 Status: Project is currently in design. Playground Equipment Enhancement and Safety Surfacing Description: Re -design, enhancement of playground equipment, and safety surfacing to comply with current state and federal regulations and enhance the quality of the parks. Cost: $800,000 Status: An RFP is being prepared for the design, purchase & installation for three playground project sites — Redhawk Community Park, Long Canyon Creek Park & Temecula Creek Park. Ronald Reagan Sports Park Restroom Expansion and Renovation, PW18-03 Description: Design and construction of a new restroom building, including additional stalls and urinals, a large snack bar and a dedicated storage case. Cost: $1,120,000 Status: The construction contract was awarded at the April 12, 2022, City Council meeting. Construction began on May 16, 2022. Construction completion is anticipated in August 2022. 8 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS American Tire Depot Description: A 7,303 square foot building to be used for tire retail and repair, as well as minor auto repair services, located at the southwest corner of Ynez Road and DLR Drive. Status: Parking lot has been paved. Wet utility tie-in construction has commenced. Arrive @ Rancho Highlands Description: A 270-unit multi -family community built on 12.32 acres that includes 55 affordable units. The project is located adjacent to the Temecula Duck Pond approximately 775 feet southeast of Rancho California Road on the north side of Ynez Road. Status: Grading and onsite storm drain permits were issued in October 2021. Grading and onsite storm drain construction has commenced. Overflow parking lot has been paved. Better Buzz Description: Demolition of 445 square feet of an existing commercial building (former Corner Bakery), the addition of a drive-thru, the addition of tower with trellis, and changes to the elevations of the existing building located at 32435 Temecula Parkway Status: Precise grading permit has been issued. Grading and construction has commenced and is ongoing. Chick-fil-a Description: Existing fast-food restaurant to reconfigure the existing drive-thru, relocate an existing trash enclosure and add square footage and landscaping. Status: Precise grading permit was issued January 13, 2022. Grading and construction has commenced and is ongoing. E City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Heirloom Farms Description: A Development Plan for a 321-unit single family residential community built on 27.86 acres consisting of detached homes and attached townhomes located on the southwest corner of Date Street and Ynez Road. Includes the installation of a new Traffic Signal at the intersection of Ynez Rod and Waverly Lane/Temecula Center Drive Status: Rough grading permit has been issued in July 2021, the offsite and private onsite street and storm drain improvements permits were issued in October 2021 and the traffic signal permit was issued in September 2021. Grading, street, and storm drain improvements and the traffic signal installation has commenced. Precise Grading plans are currently being reviewed. Las Haciendas Apartments Description: A Development Plan to construct a 77-unit affordable housing project located at 28715 Las Haciendas Street in Uptown Temecula Status: Precise grading permit was issued in December 2021. Grading has commenced in January 2022 and is ongoing. Longhorn Steakhouse Description: 5,708 square foot restaurant with outdoor patio located at 29363 Rancho California Road Status: Precise grading permit is approved. Construction expected to begin soon. Mountain View Description: Thirteen industrial buildings on Avenida Alvarado Status: Eight precise grading permits have been issued and construction has commenced. Improvements on Avenida Alvarado, along with street light installations is in process. Onsite storm drain installation has commenced. 10 City of Temecula DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT STATUS REPORT August 23, 2022 LAND DEVELOPMENT OVERSIGHT PROJECTS (Continued) Solana Assisted Living Description: A 90,000 square foot, two-story, Senior Assisted Living Facility located on the southeast corner of the Margarita Road and Solana Way. Status: A rough grading permit was issued in January 2022. Grading began on February 7, 2022. Street improvements and precise grading plans have been submitted for review. Sommers Bend Description: Land Development has provided oversight of the following submittals for plan check and inspections: final maps, Community Sports Park, and recreation lots, precise grading; street and storm drain improvements; traffic signals; street lighting; and signing & striping. Status: The mass grading permit was issued in September 2018. Sommers Bend has been paved with streetlights installed. The community sports park, Ranch at Sommers Bend, construction is complete and has been accepted at the February 8, 2022, Council Meeting with its Ribbon Cutting ceremony scheduled for February 12, 2022. The Sommers Bend recreation center construction is complete. Bond release for Long Valley Wash in process. Installation of streets, storm drains and streetlights on east end of project is in process. Grading has been completed in the Density Core, currently installing sewer. Installation of Santa Gertrudis Creek Channel improvements northwest end of project is in process. 11 REQUESTS TO SPEAK Public Comment: Non -Agenda Item: V] Agenda Item No. For El REQUEST TO SPEAK CITY OF TEMECULA Agenda Item Against El Date: 0/2-3 / 20 2.Z Request to Speak forms for Public Comments or items listed on the Consent Calendar may be submitted to the City Clerk rp for to the City Council commencing the Public Comment period. For all Public Hearing or Council Business items on the Agenda, a Request to Speak form may be submitted to the City Clerk prior to the City Council addressing that item. Once the speaker is called to speak, please come forward to the podium and state your name for the record. Name: SC4&n �Pe� Phone Number: Address: %FVL1E-CW A, Email address: Please note that all information presented at a City Council meeting becomes public record. All information provided is optional. NLAV.21W/ TEMECULA LITTLE LEAGUE # ; iF August 23, 2022 Dear City of Temecula, Temecula Little League President: Eric Scheafer 27475 Ynez Rd. #634 Temecula, CA 92591 Email: president@temeculalittleleague.org My intent for discussion is in regards to the definition of "residents" as it is used in the process when approved local leagues are allocated field space. Currently under Policy 0401, last revised January 2013, field allocations are based on an 80/20 percent resident versus non-resident equation. Available hours per week are also defined under this policy, along with the penalties for not having 80% or greater residents registered in your program. "Out of City" players go against those available hours, and if you fall below the 80/20 rule, there are repercussions that could ultimately lead to losing your Charter with the City. In my opinion, essentially the players and league can be punished for allowing "out of city" residents play in the League. Local field space becomes even less of an opportunity for long standing Leagues and its families under this policy. Temecula Little League (TLL) has been chartered with LL Int'I since 1980. Little League International has set boundaries that determine who is eligible to be in a Local League. It is mostly based on families that live in certain school districts or zip codes, with the intent that players who become school and neighborhood friends can play baseball together. Community strength is International's number one goal, and Temecula Little League has become a significant partner in pursuing that objective. Last Spring, TLL had more than 1,000 players registered. Of those registered more than 90% lived in one of the three Temecula postal codes. Their address included Temecula, even though their home was in Morgan Hill, Glen Oaks, or De Luz. This Fall Season, we luckily made it through the 80%, but there are still "Out of City" residents that will be used against our field space. Please refer to attachments: • Maps of Boundaries 1. City Limits 2. Postal Codes Considered Temecula 3. Little League International's recognized Temecula Little League boundaries • Possible Solutions • Policy 0401 Within the attachments, you will find what is recognized by Little League International (LL Int'I) as our boundaries for players. Additionally, a statement of why they use this process that qualifies LL participants to given areas. Next is the United State Postal Services designated zip code map showing what is recognized as Temecula and how it correlates to LL boundaries. Possible solutions, and lastly the policy which is in question. I believe it is safe to say that the residents in these zip codes contribute to Temecula's community and economy. They all shop in our local small businesses, grocery stores, and big box stores. They have children or they themselves attended TVUSD schools, enjoy our amazing City events, enjoy the many recreational parks or sports fields, spend time in Old Town, and much more. Also within these zip codes are significant attractions that our City relies on and considers their own. Temecula Valley Wine Country, Pechanga Casino and Resort, and the Pala Casino which all draw a large portion of our tourist attraction and employs many of our residents and "non-residents". TLL follows the guidelines and complies with the City's 80/20 rule as best as possible year in and year out. My request is not to completely remove the $10 "non-resident" fee, but consider redefining what a Resident vs. Non -Resident is when allotting field space. It would only seem fair to these individuals as they truly are a part of our community. As many of you know, the Ronald Reagan statue plaque at RRSP, references a speech given, by our then President, at the 1983 Olympic Committee. In his statement, he commends our community by stating: "...the folks in a rather small town, Temecula. They got together and built themselves a sports park ... And now the young people of that community have baseball diamonds for Little League and other sports events, just due to what's traditional Americanism." The "folks in a rather small town" refers to three zip codes currently recognized. I am greatly appreciative of the support received by the Community Services Team, Maintenance Crew, Community Services Group, and the City Council. Collectively, youth sports are represented very well, and my request would further support that Temecula does cares about its young athlete and their role in our community. Thank you, Eric Scheafer Village""'' 4! �� ` Skydi�{e� Elsinore ,, Spencers .r Cornerstone j M ' ehic4 Doggy Community Church' Crossing Trat i�9 Academy Sports Park, 1*41 Valley -wide Costco wholesale wildomar joinland Valley Dutch Village Medical Center ; _ ?,os ` ii French ValleyLos Sage �) Mulhga am,fygFun Is Sports [] Center• t,�urrieta Pa La Cresta r4.. �,,Sam Club Murneta ` I r �x QTenie i,la Be v ,,-e 1 e Glenoak Hills s:: Costco wh le' le� `. Valle De Los Caballos Aguanga Dog Boardin - Pawsnclaws, In z � COld 7owr.T@mecula 'ommunity Theater i, i r Gad ,41 IpRose Haven 9Mam Eq!=an.,e Heritage'Garden e lakGre nh;4 .�, Kkotto ap wetreat - ti C Pechanga esortrG cedas 1' Agu ,� *� De Luza� � x b Ecologicat . 'n fri3 � err." a4 Rainbow k� �1 * P Tower FBi Fallbrook Live Oak ' Coun Park IN't1/ m. u w , United States 1 Home Find ZIPS m a Radius Pnrttabte Maps SMWVC31culaWr Z)P Code Dat>oasa Zip Codes... : © a ® 0 1 Search by ZIP, address, city, or county. Temecula, CA 1 8 ZIP Code — cW49 NdpaA llim [IN• 1 j 1 County RkmAir: Cary 1 Tlmeicno: Parptr (A ?f5ami Area code: 951(kCQxkM p) Coordmates: ;Ow- 1t/M 1 1 1 1 Cty/Tftn(-5 m1e radius) 1 ZIP Codes Designated for Temecula, CA 1 Zip at City Population Type Pnm&y City Acceptable Cities unacceptable Crttes 1 OrM 61% 6IAM1Afd Trwim�3 .AAnC11 '" trlMII M91 39% Standard TMiecu a Rancno Califtnia 1 92690 2% Standard Temecula Rancho Comma w N" Temecula Little League https://www.littleleague. org/university/articles/understanding-boundaries-little-league/ E- (�' M Gttteleague.org; u 1 r=.tar.ain c _ i * W` . *IV Little League �� 0 University •� More q search Little League university Boundaries play an important role within the Little League- program by helping to maintain parity and ensuring that Little League remains a community based program. All participants at every level in a local league must either reside or attend school within the boundary of the league. Prior to each season, each league should review its boundary map to ensure that everyone in the league understands the area to be serviced and identify any changes that may need to be requested. Possible Solutions 1. Keep the rule in place as it stands today. • 80% of the players in an athletic league must be Temecula residents. Player applications+rosters are required for verification of residency. The City may require additional residency documentation as necessary. • Each season, a $10.00 non-resident fee will be assessed fear each player that is not a Temecula resident. 2. Consider LISPS Postal Zip Codes as Residents Option 1: Reduce the fee for newly assumed "Residents" and include them in the 80% Option 2: Remove the fee for newly assumed "Residents" and include them in the 80% Option 3: Keep the fee in place ($10.00), but consider the postal codes a part of the 80% City of Temecula 19891, Community Services Department NMM Subject: City Requirements for Recognition of Youth Athletic Leagues Date: February 18, 1998 (Revised January 2013) Division: Recreation Policy Number: 0401 Approved By: Herman D. Parker, Director of Community Services POLICY: Because of increasingly high demand for athletic facility use, before a youth athletic league is recognized and allotted field or athletic facility use, they must adequately demonstrate that they are serving the sporting needs of City of Temecula residents. The following criteria must be met to ensure that all athletic leagues serve Temecula youth sports. BACKGROUND: Temecula is a rapidly growing, family -oriented community that currently has several youth sport leagues offered on its existing fields and facilities. These leagues in general, serve the needs of Temecula residents and provide services that enhance the quality of life in Temecula. The rapid growth of youth sports leagues continue to create a high demand for athletic fields and facilities. Sport leagues contribute to the continued demand and need for space and facilities. As a result, the following policy has been adopted by the Community Services Department to determine when and how to recognize a newly formed sports league and allocate field space based upon residency numbers, as well as maintaining the requirements necessary to remain a recognized league within the City. CRITERIA: • Newly formed leagues will be reviewed only if field space is available. • A newly formed league must have a minimum of 200 Temecula resident players to constitute a league. • 80% of the members on an Executive Board of Directors (President, Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer) for a newly formed sports league in Temecula must be Temecula residents. • Executive Board of Directors that governs youth sports leagues in Temecula must be based or headquartered within the City of Temecula. • Each sports league must have established bylaws for its league. • A league must have a minimum of four (4) resident teams in the same age division. • 80% of the players in an athletic league must be Temecula residents. Player applications/rosters are required for verification of residency. The City may require additional residency documentation as necessary. • The youth athletic league must be a registered non-profit organization and hold a non-profit agency identification number. • The youth athletic league must have $1,000,000 of General Liability Insurance that names the City of Temecula/ Temecula Community Service District as additional insured. • Each season, a $10.00 non-resident fee will be assessed fear each player that is not a Temecula resident. • All criteria listed above must be met in order to be recognized as a youth league. If requirements are not met, applicant must wait until the next traditional season to re -apply, should field space be available. • Should an established league fall below the 80% Temecula resident requirement, the following penalties will apply: Traditional Season 1 15% Penalty Traditional Season 2 30% Penalty Notice of Suspension for following season League will be given option to rent field space if available Traditional Season 3 Field space unavailable through field distribution process League will be given option to rent field space if available Traditional Season 4 May re -apply. Should 80% residency requirement not be met a 45% penalty will apply and league will not be considered for future field allocation. League will be given option to rent field space if available. Example of 15% Penalty: Note: The City reserves the right to retain the field space hours from penalties as deemed appropriate. fSAUPI Fl RFCInFNCV PFRCFNTAr FS - Al 1 I FA(:IIFR LEAGUE TOTAL PLAYERS RESIDENTS LEAGUE % OF RESIDENTS % OF TOTAL NO. RESIDENTS League A 737 569 77% 30% League B 490 430 881/6 23% League C 383 257 67 % 14 % League D 302 283 941/6 15% League E 1 443 358 81% 19% 100% TOTALS 1 2,355 1 1,897 1 Hn1JR AI I.nCATIANS PFR WFFK LEAGUE 15% OF HOURS 85% OF HOURS TOTAL HOURS/WEEK 87 493 580 League A 148 148 League B 35 112 147 League C 67 67 League D 23 74 97 League E 29 93 122 TOTALS 87 493 580