The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2022-72 CC ResolutionRESOLUTION NO.2022-72 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA ADOPTING THE FINAL NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE RENDEZVOUS PHASE II PROJECT CONSISTING OF A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Procedural Findings. The City Council of the City of Temecula does hereby find, determine and declare that: A. On November 12, 2020, Pacific West Development filed Planning Application Nos. PA20-1323, a General Plan Amendment; PA20-1324, a Planned Development Overlay Amendment; PA20-1325, a Development Plan; and PA20-1326, a Tentative Tract Map. These applications (collectively "the Project") were filed in a manner in accord with the City of Temecula General Plan and Development Code. B. The Project was processed including, but not limited to all public notices, in the time and manner prescribed by State and local law, including the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code 21000, et seq. and the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines, 14. Cal. Code Regs 15000 et seq. (collectively referred to as "CEQA"). C. Pursuant to CEQA, the City is the lead agency for the Project because it is the public agency with the authority and principal responsibility for approving the Project. D. The City contracted with Ascent Environmental Inc. for the independent preparation of an Initial Study to analyze the potential environmental effects of the Project. Based on the information contained in the Initial Study, Ascent Environmental Inc. and City staff concluded the project could not have a significant impact on the environment. Based upon this determination, Ascent Environmental Inc. prepared, and City staff concurred in, a Draft Negative Declaration ("Draft ND") in accordance with CEQA Section 21080(c) and Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. E. The City circulated a Notice of Intent to Adopt the Draft ND, along with the Draft ND and its Appendices, to the public and other interested parties for a 30-day comment period from May 27, 2021 through June 27, 2021. The City published a Notice of Intent to Adopt for the Draft ND in the Press Enterprise, a newspaper of general circulation within the City. Copies of the documents were made available for public review and inspection at the offices of the Department of Community Development, located at City Hall, 41000 Main Street, Temecula, California 92590 and on the City of Temecula website. F. During the comment period, the City received two (2) written comments on the Draft ND from various agencies, individuals, and organizations and a response to all the comments made therein was prepared, submitted to the Planning Commission, and incorporated into the administrative record of the proceedings. G. On July 20, 2022, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed public hearing to consider the Final ND and the Project, at which time the Planning Commission heard and considered information presented by City staff on the Project and its environmental review. In addition, all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify regarding this matter. H. Following consideration of the entire record before it at the public hearing and due consideration of the Project the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 2022-22, "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A RESOLUTION ENTITLED "A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF TEMECULA APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR A 134 UNIT APARTMENT COMMUNITY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 150 FEET WEST OF COSMIC DRIVE (APN'S: 944-370-001, 005, 006, 007, 010, 012, 013) (PA20-1325)". I. On September 13, 2022, the City Council considered the Project and the Negative Declaration at a duly noticed public hearing which time the City staff presented its report, and all interested persons had an opportunity to and did testify either in support or in opposition to the Project and the Negative Declaration. Section 2. Findings. After due consideration of the Final ND and the Project and in the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission hereby finds and resolves that: A. All of the above recitals are true and correct, and are hereby incorporated into this section as though set forth in full. B. That the Initial Study/ND has been prepared and circulated in compliance with the provisions of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the procedures set forth in the ordinances of the City. C. Agencies and interested members of the public have been afforded ample notice and opportunity to comment on the Draft ND, the Final ND, and on the Project. The Project has been environmentally reviewed pursuant to the provisions of CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines. D. The City Council has independently considered the administrative record before it, which is hereby incorporated by reference and which includes the Final ND, the written and oral comments on the Draft ND, the Draft ND and its Appendices, staff reports and presentations, and all oral and written testimony. E. The City Council reviewed the Final ND and all comments received regarding the Final ND prior to and at the September 13, 2022 public hearing, and based on the whole record before it finds that: (1) the Final ND was prepared in compliance with CEQA; (2) there is no substantial evidence that the Project could have a significant effect on the environment; and (3) the Final ND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission. F. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council adopt the Final ND attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. Section 3. Based on the findings set forth in the Resolution, the City Council hereby adopts the Negative Declaration attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by this reference. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Temecula this 13"' day of September, 2022. ATTES Randi Johl, City Clerk [SEAL] �J Matt Rahn, Mayor 1 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss CITY OF TEMECULA ) I, Randi Johl, City Clerk of the City of Temecula, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 2022-72 was duly and regularly adopted by the City Council of the City of Temecula at a meeting thereof held on the 131h day of September, 2022, by the following vote: AYES: 5 COUNCIL MEMBERS: Alexander, Edwards, Rahn, Schwank, Stewart NOES: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAIN: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: 0 COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Randi Johl, City Clerk 4 Final Initial Study/Negative Declaration State Clearinghouse No. 2021050549 Rendezvous Phase II Apartments Project Prepared by: City of Temecula Community Development Department 41000 Main Street Temecula, CA 92590 (951)694-6400 Community Development Department July 2022 Overview This Final Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) has been prepared for the Rendezvous Phase II Apartments project. An Initial Study Checklist and environmental analysis has been prepared to determine the appropriate type of California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) document. As documented in the attached Initial Study checklist, the proposed project would not result in potentially significant impacts and no mitigation measures are required. As such, a Negative Declaration is the appropriate CEQA document for the proposed project. During the public review period for the Draft IS/ND from May 27, 2021 to June 27, 2021, a total of two (2) comment letters were received. Responses to the comments received have been prepared and are included in Appendix F along with the comment letters. City of Temecula Initial Study / Environmental Checklist Project Title Rendezvous Phase II Apartments Project (Project) Lead Agency Name and Address City of Temecula (City) 41000 Main Street, Temecula CA 92590 Contact Person and Phone Number Scott Cooper, Associate Planner (951) 506-5137 Project Location The Project is located in the central northeastern portion of the City of Temecula, which is within the County of Riverside approximately 85 miles southeast of Los Angeles, 60 miles northeast of San Diego, and 25 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean (Figure 1). The Project is within a residential area, approximately 1.0 mile east of Interstate 15 (1-15) and 2.0 miles south of State Route 79 (SR 79) (Figure 2). Locally, the Project is south of Rancho California Road, west of Cosmic Drive, and east of Via Las Colinas (Project Site) (Figure 3). The Project Site is identified as Assessor's Parcel Numbers (APN) 944-370-001, 944-370-005, 944-370-006, 944-370-007, 944-370-008, 944-370-010, 944-370-012, and 944-370-013. Project Sponsor's Name and Address Pacific West Development 32823 Temecula Parkway A, Temecula, CA 92592 General Plan Designation Professional Office (PO) and Medium Residential (M) (7-12 dwelling units/acre) (Figure 4) Zoning Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) (Figure 5) Description of Project The proposed Rendezvous Phase 11 Apartments Project (Project) includes development of 134 attached apartment units within six three-story buildings on approximately 9.5 acres. The Project includes 56 one - bedroom units, 42 two -bedroom units, and 36 three -bedroom units. In addition, the Project includes a central pool, landscaped open space and recreational areas, exercise room, bicycle parking, and 280 vehicle parking spaces. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessible pathways would be provided throughout the Project Site. The Project is Phase II of the two-phase development of Temecula Village, a multi -family apartment community on a combined 22.82-acre site. Phase 1, which includes 160 proposed apartment units, was approved on January 3, 2018 and is currently under construction. A total of 294 units would be constructed under Phase I and Phase 11, for a combined density of 12.88 dwelling units per acre. The total building area for Phase I and 11 would be 228,939 square feet, for a floor area ratio of 0.69. The site plan is depicted in Figure 6. Project elevations are shown in Figure 7. The heights for the proposed structures are as follows: 39 feet, 11 inches for the six three-story apartment buildings; 18 feet, 10 inches for the garages; 11 feet for the carports; and 18 feet, 8 inches for the exercise room. Approximately 2.6 acres of the 9.5-acre Phase II Project Site would be landscaped with a combination of trees, shrubs, and ground cover. Project landscaping would comply with the Cit 's Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance outlined in Municipal Code (TMC). Native and incorporated wherever possible. Chapter 17.32 of the Temecula drought tolerant plants would be The proposed site plan, building design, and landscaping would be consistent with the City of Temecula City-wide Design Guidelines (City of Temecula, 2005a) and City Residential Development Standards (Section 17.06.040 of the TMC). The Project would be designed in compliance with the California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen). Project sustainability features would include the following: ► Energy efficient building materials, appliances, lighting and mechanical systems, and water efficient plumbing systems ► Solar panels on the roofs of the apartment buildings ► Electric conduit for future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS) ► Bicycle parking ► Real-time energy monitors to track energy use ► New sidewalks and paving with high solar reflectivity materials ► City -issued water meters that track real time water use with data logging equipment if necessary ► Low water irrigation systems and landscaping Operations. The Project is anticipated to be open for occupancy in 2024. The Project is anticipated to house approximately 427 residents (based on the City's average household size of 3.18 persons per household). The Project is not anticipated to employ any full-time equivalent staff. Existing Site Conditions. The Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded (see Figure 8a and 8b). There are currently temporary construction trailers on -site for the Phase I development. In addition, there are three temporary sediment desilting basins on -site to treat site runoff, which will be removed once construction activities are complete. There are no permanent structures on the Project Site. Ruderal vegetation is present within the Project Site; there are no existing trees or shrubs that would require removal. Project Objectives. The Project objectives include the following: ► Provide high -quality apartment units that would help fulfill the City's existing and future housing demand. ► Promote the development of residential land uses that convey a high -quality architectural/visual image and character. ► Provide housing in proximity to existing transit and commercial centers to reduce regional vehicle miles traveled (VMT). Required Discretionary Actions. The Project would require the following discretionary entitlements from the City: ► Development Plan approval to allow for the construction of a 134- unit apartment community within the existing PDO-5 on the south N side of Rancho California Road, approximately 150 feet west of Cosmic Drive. ► Tentative Tract Map (TTM) approval to combine eight existing contiguous parcels into a single parcel under TTM 38043. ► General Plan Amendment to Medium Density Residential (M), which allows 7 to 12.9 dwelling units per acre, in existing areas designated as Professional Office (PO). ► Planned Development Overlay Amendment for PDO-5, Temecula Village, to allow for the development of a residential community within Phase 11. As part of the amendment, the PDO-5 would be changed to Rendezvous. Because the Project would generate new vehicle trips, the applicant would also be required to pay a Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) to the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG). Access and Parking. Regional access to the Project Site is provided via I- 15 from the Rancho California Road interchange. Local access to the Project Site is currently provided via Rancho California Road and an existing access road that was constructed for the Phase I development. Pedestrian and vehicle access to the future development within the Project Site would be provided on this access road off Rancho California Road, with a separate driveway for emergency access only. A total of 280 parking spaces would be included throughout the Project Site, including uncovered parking stalls, carports, and assigned garage spaces. A total of 6 accessible spaces and 6 motorcycle parking spaces would be provided. Bicycle parking would also be provided. Utilities/Infrastructure Improvements. Implementation of the Project would require the extension of utilities and other infrastructure improvements to serve the development of 134 apartment units. Services include water, wastewater, storm drainage, electricity, natural gas, telecommunications, and solid waste disposal. Electricity is provided by Southern California Edison (SCE) and natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company (SoCalGas). Solid waste disposal is provided by CR&R Environmental Services and a variety of companies provide telecommunications services. Water Supply. The Rancho California Water District (RCWD) is the water provider for the Project Site and the City. The Project would include connections to the existing 12-inch water servicing line within Rancho California Road. The water system design is consistent with the requirements of RCWD and the City's Public Works Department. The Project applicant would be required to pay a water service charge to RCWD to maintain and upgrade its system. Wastewater. Wastewater facilities for the Project Site and the City are provided by the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD). Wastewater produced by Project would be treated by the Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, located at 42565 Avenida Alvarado, Temecula. 3 Stormwater. According to the Project's Hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a), the majority of the Project Site currently drains to the north side of the property and ultimately discharges to the existing 30-inch public storm drain along Rancho California Road. The Project Site currently experiences off -site run on from the east and south property lines. The Project is a Priority Development Project and has been designed consistent with the requirements of the City of Temecula Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual (City of Temecula, 2018a). The BMP Design Manual was developed in compliance with the following requirements: ► City of Temecula Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance (TMC Chapter 8.28 et seq.) ► Regional municipal separate storm sewer system (MS4) Permit (California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015- 0100) requirements for stormwater management ► City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual (City of Temecula, 2020a) ► City of Temecula Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (TMC Chapter 18.18 et seq.) In accordance with the Project's Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project includes source control BMPs to prevent illicit discharges into the MS4. These BMPs include reducing exposure of refuse areas, implementing sweeping and washing requirements for paved areas, stenciling or installing signage at storm drain inlets and catch basins, and screening trash enclosures. The Project also includes site design BMPs, such as maintaining existing drainage pathways and hydrologic features; minimizing impervious surface areas; and landscaping with a native and drought tolerant species to minimize the use of irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides. BMPs that would be implemented during construction include hydroseeding and maintaining the existing on -site sediment desilting basins. Runoff from the Project Site would be conveyed through underground storm drain pipes and treated through a MaxWell drywell system (i.e., an infiltration/detention pipe system). The drywell system would remove sediment and debris from the site runoff, and the runoff would then be discharged into the soil about 20 feet below ground. Rows of 50-inch high -density polyethylene (HDPE) underground storm drain pipes would provide the treatment volume for the 85th Percentile 24-hour storm, while the drywells would be sized for a 36-hour drawdown time, per the City of Temecula Water Quality Management Plan guidelines. The drywell system would include a weir with an orifice at the outlet to discharge any additional volume from the site at a flowrate at or below the pre - developed condition. After being treated, the overflow runoff would discharge to the existing 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) under Rancho California Road. 4 Site Preparation and Construction. It is anticipated that construction would occur over a single phase for a duration of approximately 20 to 24 months. Site preparation would require preliminary grading cut of approximately 27,322 cubic yards, fill of 3,562 cubic yards, and export of 23,760 cubic yards. Because the Project Site was previously rough graded for Phase I, excavation is anticipated to be limited to a maximum depth of 3 feet below the ground surface (bgs). No acquisition of right-of-way (ROW) or easements would be required as part of the Project; all required ROW was previously dedicated as part of Phase I. Construction staging would occur on -site. Construction equipment that would be utilized during site preparation and grading activities may include tractors, backhoes, haul trucks, graders, pavers, and water trucks. Best management practices to reduce air pollutant emissions would be implemented during construction activities, which include limiting idling to 5 minutes or less and maintaining construction equipment per manufacturer's specifications. Furthermore, construction activities would comply with CalGreen requirements, which include mandatory construction and demolition recycling. After completion of site grading, construction of the building pad would occur, followed by project construction. Following building construction, utilities, storm drains, catch basins, sidewalks, curbs, gutters, striping, landscaping, fences, walls, and lighting would be installed. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting The land uses surrounding the Project Site include the following: ► North — The Project Site is bordered immediately to the north by Rancho California Road. The area across Rancho California Road is developed with the Portofino Apartments, which include 344 apartment units with a clubhouse and lounge; fitness center; conference room and business center; two pools with spas; basketball, tennis, and volleyball courts; picnic areas with barbeques; and covered parking and garages. ► West — The Project Site is bordered immediately to the west by an existing access road that provides access to the adjacent Temecula Ridge Apartment Homes. The apartment complex consists of 220 apartment units with a lounge, conference room, playground, pool and spa/hot tub, business and fitness centers, garage, and dog park. ► South — The Project Site is bordered immediately to the south by a construction site for the future Phase I development that consists of 160 residential units. ► East — The Project Site is bordered immediately to the east by a single-family residential neighborhood. 5 Public Agencies Whose Approval is The Project is anticipated to require the following review and approvals: Required Agency Action City of Temecula • Approval of Development Plan • Adoption of Negative Declaration • Approval of TTM • General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment • Ministerial approvals including Water Quality Management Plan, grading permit, and building permit. WRCOG Administration of TUMF Eastern Municipal Water District Review and approval of sewer plans Rancho California Water District Review and approval of water plans Have California Native American tribes In accordance with Assembly Bill (AB) 52 and Public Resources Code traditionally and culturally affiliated Section 21080.3.1, the City sent formal notification letters of the Project, with the project area requested dated November 13, 2020, to the Native American tribes recommended consultation pursuant to Public by the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC). These tribes Resources Code section 21080.3.1? If include the Pechanga Band of Luiseno Indians (Pechanga Tribe), Agua so, is there a plan for consultation that Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseno Indians (Rincon includes, for example, the Tribe), Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and Torres Martinez Desert determination of significance of Cahuilla Indians. The City received responses from the Rincon and impacts to tribal cultural resources, Pechanga Tribes on November 30, 2020 and December 15, 2020, procedures regarding confidentiality, respectively, with both tribes requesting consultation. Consultation with etc.? these tribes concluded on May 20, 2021. Refer to Section 18, Tribal Cultural Resources, of this Final Initial Study/Negative Declaration (IS/ND) for additional information. Figures Figure 1 — Regional Location Figure 2 — Project Vicinity Figure 3 — Project Site Figure 4 — Existing General Plan Land Use Designations Figure 5 — Existing Zoning Figure 6 — Site Plan Figure 7 — Project Elevations Figure 8 — Existing Project Site Photos Appendices Appendix A: Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Modeling Data Appendix B: Noise Modeling Appendix C: Phase 1 ESA Appendix D: Water and Sewer Letters Appendix E: Focused Traffic Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Appendix F: Response to Comments on the Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration 7 Sources: Adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Figure 1 Regional Location Wk 0 rPark�E{k - '!► -ay ,rye,_ xti Project Boundary 5 � Parks a}. .• , 0 1,000 2,000 d * � ! Feet R 2019 Riverside county Imagery 20210014.01 GIS CO2 Sources: Data downloaded from Riverside County in 2021; adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Figure 2 Project Vicinity 9 + rnia Rtl ,� ho Califfl "" 0 33 OIL n u Q Project Boundary 0 100 200 A� Feet l -r 2019 Riverside County Imagery 20210014.01 GI 003 Sources: Data downloaded from Riverside County in 2021; adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Figure 3 Project Site 10 F— 1 W-0.0110 ,qia Rd 1 14 Q Project Boundary General Plan Land Use Residential 0 Low Medium (3-6 Du/Ac Max) I Medium (7-12 Du/Ac Max) High (13-20 Du/Ac Max) Commercial/Office 0 Professional Office 0 100 200 Feet 2019 Riverside County Imagery 20210014.01 GIs 004 Sources: Data downloaded from the City of Temecula in 2019; adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Figure 4 Existing General Plan Land Use 0 Sources: Data downloaded from the City of Temecula in 2021; adapted by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Figure 5 Existing Zoning 13 Source: Provided by David Neault Associates in 2021 Figure 6a Site Plan 15 Source: Figure produced by David Neault Associates 2021 Figure 6b Site Pan 17 Source: Provided by John Watson Architects, Inc. in 2021 Figure 7a Project Elevations 19 Source: Provided by John Watson Architects, Inc. in 2021 Figure 7b Project Elevations 21 Source: Photograph taken by Ascent Environmental in 2021. View of the Project Site frontage along Rancho California Road (looking west) Source: Photograph taken by Ascent Environmental in 2021. View of the access roadway constructed for Phase I of the Temecula Village Apartments, which bisects the Project Site (looking south) Figure 8a Existing Project Site Photos 22 Source: Photograph taken by Ascent Environmental in 2021. View of the Project Site, which is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded (looking northwest from the access roadway) Source: Photograph taken by Ascent Environmental in 2021. View of the Project Site, which is currently a construction staging area for Phase I of the Temecula Village Apartments (looking east from the access roadway) Figure 8b Existing Project Site Photos Enviro nm ental Fact ors Potentially A ffect ed The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Mineral Resources Aqriculture and Forestry Resources Noise Air Quality Population/Housing Bioloqical Resources Public Services Cultural Resources Recreation Enerov Transportation Geoloqy/Soils Tribal Cultural Resources Greenhouse Gas Emissions Utilities/Service Systems Hazards and Hazardous Materials Wildfire Hvdroloov/Water Quality Mandatory Findings of Significance Land Use/Planninq Determination (To be completed by the lead agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: X I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier INITIAL STUDY or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier INITIAL STUDY or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ~- 1' . \ . '2.Z.. Signature Sae\~ ~oo~cc- Date Printed Name City of Temecula For 23 24 1. AESTHETICS. Except as provided in Public Resources Code Section 21099, would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c In non-urbanized areas, substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of public views of the site and its surroundings? (Public views are those that are experienced from publicly accessible vantage point.) If the project is in an urbanized area, would the project conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality? X d Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area? X Comments: 1.a. Less Than Significant Impact. A scenic vista is a viewpoint that provides expansive views of a highly valued landscape or resource, such as waterways, hills, valleys, or mountains. According to the City General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element (City of Temecula, 2005b), the City of Temecula has several scenic resources that include the western escarpment and southern ridgelines, the Santa Margarita River, slopes in the Sphere of Influence, and other important landforms and historic landscape features. The City General Plan Community Design Element (City of Temecula, 2005c) identifies goals and policies to protect public views of significant natural features, such as the local agriculture; rolling hills to the south, east, and west of the Temecula Valley; and the Murrieta and Temecula Creeks. All public and private development projects are subject to review by the City to ensure consistency with the City General Plan Community Design Element to maintain public views of scenic resources. The Project Site is entirely graded and slopes moderately toward the north-northwest. Views from the Project Site include existing multi-family residences to the north and west, single-family residences to the east, and the construction site for the Phase I residential development to the south. In addition, the Project Site offers limited views of the Santa Ana Mountains to the west; however, these views are predominately obstructed by the intervening residential development immediately west of the Project Site. The Project includes construction of three-story buildings (39 feet, 11 inches tall) that would conform with City height requirements and be compatible with the heights of surrounding residential developments. The Project design would also be consistent with the City General Plan Community Design Element (City of Temecula, 2005c) and City-Wide Design Guidelines (City of Temecula, 2005a). Furthermore, views of the Santa Ana Mountains from the Project Area would not be substantially obstructed by Project development due to the lower elevation of the Project Site compared to the adjacent residential development to the west. Therefore, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. Impacts would be less than significant. 1.b. Less Than Significant Impact. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the nearest Officially Designated State Scenic Highway is a 47.7-mile segment of State Route 74 (SR 74) that is located over 25 miles east of the Project Site (Caltrans, 2019). This segment of SR 74 extends from the western boundary of the San Bernardino National Forest to Route 111 in Palm Desert. The Project Site is approximately 1.0 mile east of I-15, which is listed as an eligible state scenic highway from Route 76 near the San Luis Rey River to Route 91 near the City of Corona; however, I-15 is not considered an officially designated state scenic highway. 25 The Project Site, nearby roadways, and surrounding land are not within an eligible or officially designated state scenic highway. Furthermore, the Project would not be visible from an eligible or officially designated state scenic highway. Therefore, the Project would not affect views to or from a state scenic highway. Based on the above discussion, the Project would not substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway. Impacts would be less than significant. 1.c. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is within a developed and urbanized area in the City of Temecula. The Project Site is entirely graded and vacant, except for temporary construction trailers and sediment desilting basins. The Project includes the construction of residential apartments and would require a Planned Development Overlay Amendment, which would allow the development of multi-family residential land uses in Phase II. The proposed structures would be designed to conform with City height requirements, be consistent with the City General Plan Community Design Element (City of Temecula, 2005c) and City-Wide Design Guidelines (City of Temecula, 2005a), and be compatible with the aesthetics of surrounding residential developments (see Figure 7). Therefore, the Project would not conflict with applicable zoning and other regulations governing scenic quality. Impacts would be less than significant. 1.d. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is within a developed and urbanized area in the City of Temecula. The Project Site is currently vacant with no existing light sources; however, the Project Site receives spillover light from adjacent residential developments, as well as vehicles and streetlamps on adjacent roadways. The Project would introduce new sources of exterior and interior lighting. However, proposed lighting would be subject to light pollution regulations in TMC Section 17.22.176, the County of Riverside’s Mount Palomar Light Pollution Ordinance (Ordinance No. 635), and Policy 2.5 of the City General Plan Community Design Element (City of Temecula, 2005c). Lighting would be downward shielded and dark sky compliant to minimize lighting and glare. Daytime glare is attributed to the reflection of artificial and natural lighting off of highly reflective surfaces, such as windows. Mid- to high-rise buildings with large surface areas of reflective or mirrorlike materials are a common source of daytime glare, especially around sunrise and sunset. The Project is a three-story structure that would be built with textured, non-reflective surfaces, non-reflective (mirrored) glass, and downward shielded lighting to minimize glare and prevent spillover effects onto adjacent structures. Solar panels would be angled upward and would have low reflectivity. Therefore, the Project would not create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect daytime or nighttime views in the area. Impacts would be less than significant. References: Caltrans. (2019, August). List of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways. Retrieved from California State Scenic Highways: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community- livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. City of Temecula. (2005a, August 9). City of Temecula City-Wide Design Guidelines. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/297/Temecula-City-Wide-Design-Guidelines-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005b). Open Space/Conservation Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005c). Community Design Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/279/Community-Design-PDF?bidId=. 26 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X Comments: 2.a. and b. No Impact. According to the California Department of Conservation (CDOC) Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the Project Site is within an area mapped as Urban and Built-up Land (CDOC, 2016). The nearest land designated as Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance is approximately 2.1 miles southwest of the Project Site. The Project Site consists of vacant land within a developed, urban area in the City of Temecula. The Project Site is bordered by Rancho California Road to the north and surrounded by residential land uses in all directions. There are no agricultural uses or related operations in proximity to the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. As shown in Figure 5, the Project Site is currently zoned Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5); there are no lands within or adjacent to the Project Site that are zoned for agricultural use. In addition, the Project Site and surrounding lands are not enrolled under a Williamson Act contract (CDOC, 2017). Therefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract. Therefore, there would be no impact. 2.c and d. No Impact. The Project Site consists of vacant land within a developed, urban area in the City of Temecula. Ruderal vegetation is present within the Project Site; there are no existing trees or shrubs that would require removal. As shown in Figure 5, the Project Site is currently zoned Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5); there are no lands 27 within or adjacent to the Project Site that are zoned for forest land or timberland production. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Furthermore, the Project would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. As such, there would be no impact. 2.e. No Impact. As discussed under Response 2.a through 2.d above, no agricultural or forest uses are located within or near the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would not involve changes in the existing environment that could result in conversion of farmland to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use. Therefore, there would be no impact. References: CDOC. (2016). California Important Farmland Finder. Retrieved from California Department of Conservation: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. CDOC. (2017). State of California Williamson Act Land. Retrieved from https://planning.lacity.org/eir/HollywoodCenter/Deir/ELDP/(E)%20Initial%20Study/Initial%20Study/Attachment %20B%20References/California%20Department%20of%20Conservation%20Williamson%20Map%202016.pdf. 28 3. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard? X c Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X d Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial number of people? X ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING The Project Site is in the western portion of Riverside County within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), an approximately 6,745 square mile area bounded by the Pacific Ocean to the west; the San Gabriel, San Bernardino, and San Jacinto mountains to the north and east; and San Diego County to the south. The SCAB includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino counties, in addition to the Coachella Valley areas in Riverside County. The regional climate within the SCAB in considered semi-arid and is characterized by warm summers, mild winters, infrequent seasonal rainfall, moderate daytime onshore breezes, and moderate humidity. The air quality within the SCAB is primarily influenced by meteorology and a wide range of emissions sources, such as dense population centers, heavy vehicular traffic, and industry. Air pollutant emissions within the SCAB are generated primarily by stationary and mobile sources. Stationary sources can be divided into two major subcategories: point and area sources. Point sources occur at a specific location and are often identified by an exhaust vent or stack. Examples include boilers or combustion equipment that produce electricity or generate heat. Area sources are widely distributed and include such sources as residential and commercial water heaters, painting operations, lawn mowers, agricultural fields, landfills, and some consumer products. Mobile sources refer to emissions from motor vehicles, including tailpipe and evaporative emissions, and are classified as either on-road or off-road. On-road sources may be legally operated on roadways and highways. Off-road sources include aircrafts, ships, trains, and self-propelled construction equipment. Air pollutants can also be generated by the natural environment, such as when high winds suspend fine dust particles. The portion of Riverside County where the Project is located is currently in nonattainment for the national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) for ozone and fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and the California ambient air quality standards (CAAQS) for ozone, respirable particulate matter (PM10), and PM2.5 (CARB, 2019). THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) serves as the air district that regulates emissions of air pollutants within the SCAB. Guidance provided by SCAQMD indicates that a project would result in a potentially significant air quality impact if a project would (SCAQMD, 2019):  generate construction emissions in exceedance of 100 pounds per day (lbs./day) of oxides of nitrogen (NOX), 75 lbs./day of reactive organic gases (ROG), 150 lbs./day of PM10 and oxides of sulfur (SOX), 55 lbs./day of PM2.5, 550 lbs./day of carbon monoxide (CO), and 3 lbs./day of lead; 29  generate operational emissions in exceedance of 55 lbs./day of NOX and ROG, and PM2.5, 150 lbs./day of PM10 and SOX, 550 lbs./day of CO, and 3 lbs./day of lead;  generate long-term operational mobile-source CO emissions that would result in, or contribute to, an exceedance of the CAAQS (exceedance of 20 parts per million [ppm] over a 1-hour period or exceedance of 9 ppm over an 8-hour period) or NAAQS (exceedance of 35 ppm over a 1-hour period or exceedance of 9 ppm over an 8-hour period) for CO;  expose sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminant (TAC) concentrations that result in an incremental increase in cancer risk greater than 10 in one million and/or a noncarcinogenic hazard index of 1.0 or greater; and/or  create objectionable odors. Projects that exceed these thresholds of significance would produce emissions that would conflict with the SCAB’s overall maintenance or attainment of the NAAQS and CAAQS for criteria air pollutants. The NAAQS and CAAQS represent concentrations of criteria air pollutants protective of human health and are substantiated by extensive scientific evidence. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the California Air Resources Board (CARB) recognize that ambient air quality below these concentrations would not cause adverse health impacts to exposed receptors. In connecting an air district’s (i.e., SCAQMD) thresholds of significance to its anticipated date of attainment, projects that demonstrate levels of construction and/or operational emissions below the applicable thresholds would not result in cumulatively considerable emissions that would cause an adverse health impact related to exposure to criteria air pollutants in elevated concentrations. Similarly, projects that demonstrate emissions levels in exceedance of an applicable threshold could contribute to the continued nonattainment designation of a region or potentially degrade a region from attainment to nonattainment. Resulting acute or chronic respiratory and cardiovascular illness could occur, with symptoms including coughing, difficulty breathing, chest pain, eye and throat irritation, and, in extreme cases, death caused by exacerbation of existing respiratory and cardiovascular disease, cancer, impaired immune and lung function. Projects that generate odors would be subject to SCAQMD’s Rule 202, “Nuisance,” which stipulates that persons shall not discharge quantities of odors or other materials that could cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to a considerable number of persons or to the public. 3.a. Less than Significant Impact. The 2016 Air Quality Management Plan (2016 AQMP) serves as SCAQMD’s state implementation plan (SIP) submittal to CARB to track the path towards the SCAB reaching attainment under the NAAQS and CAAQS (SCAQMD, 2017). The project-level thresholds of significance identified below in the discussion under Response 3.b. were developed by SCAQMD in consideration of the AQMP and efforts to achieve attainment of ambient air quality standards. Therefore, projects that emit criteria air pollutants and precursors in levels below these thresholds would be consistent with the 2016 AQMP. Emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors were modeled using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Version 2016.3.2 computer program (CAPCOA, 2016). Detailed information regarding modeling assumptions and outputs can be found in Appendix A. Project construction would generate exhaust emissions from construction equipment and vehicle trips, fugitive dust from ground disturbing activities, and off-gas emissions from architectural coatings and paving. Operation of the Project would increase the amount of operational air emissions from vehicles accessing the Project Site (mobile sources), natural gas consumption (energy sources), and use of consumer products and operation of landscaping equipment (area sources). However, as discussed below, construction and operation of the Project would not result in daily emissions in exceedance of the SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance for emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5. As discussed above, the SCAB is in nonattainment for several of the NAAQS (ozone and PM2.5) and CAAQS (ozone, PM10, and PM2.5). Because emissions of ROG, NOX, PM2.5, and PM10 would not exceed these thresholds, construction- and operation-related emissions of criteria air pollutants and precursors would not conflict with an applicable AQMP. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 30 3.b. Less than Significant Impact. As discussed above, construction of the Project would generate criteria pollutants and precursor emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment, worker commute trips, and fugitive dust emissions. Construction would commence in 2022 and occur over a 24-month period ending in 2024. Air quality calculations are included in Appendix A. Table 3-1 summarizes the projected construction emissions that would be generated by the Project. Table 3-1 Maximum Daily Emissions of Criteria Pollutants and Precursors Associated with Construction of the Project Year ROG (lb./day) NOX (lb./day) PM10 (lb./day) PM2.5 (lb./day) 2022 2.0 39 8 4 2023 21 14 3 1 2024 21 1 <1 <1 SCAQMD Significance Criteria 75 100 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases, NOX = oxides of nitrogen, PM10 = respirable particulate matter, PM2.5 = fine particulate matter, lb./day = pounds per day, SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District Source: Modeling conducted by Ascent Environmental in April 2021 using CalEEMod v. 2016.3.2 As shown in Table 3-1, construction-generated emissions of ROG, NOX, PM10, and PM2.5 would not exceed SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance. The Project would generate emissions associated with typical activities associated with residential land uses including mobile source emissions from residents’ use of vehicles, persons visiting residents of the Project Site, and worker commute trips. The Project is not anticipated to employ any full-time equivalent staff. Natural gas would also be directly consumed on-site from natural gas–powered stove tops and fireplaces as well as indirectly consumed to produce energy to power the Project. The infrequent application of paint, use of consumer products and landscaping equipment, and application of fertilizers on landscaped areas would also result in operational emissions of air pollutants. Table 3-2 summarizes the projected operations-related emissions associated with the Project. Table 3-2 Maximum Daily Operational Emissions of Criteria Pollutants and Precursors for the Project Source ROG (lb./day) NOX (lb./day) PM10 (lb./day) PM2.5 (lb./day) Mobile 41 3 111 11 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 Area 1 8 6 2 Total 42 11 17 13 SCAQMD Significance Criteria 55 55 150 55 Exceeds Thresholds? No No No No Notes: ROG = reactive organic gases; NOX = oxides of nitrogen; PM10 = respirable particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter lb./day = pounds per day; SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District Source: Modeling conducted by Ascent Environmental in April 2021 using CalEEMod v. 2016.3.2 As shown in Table 3-2, operational emissions of criteria pollutants and precursors would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD’s CEQA thresholds of significance. Thus, construction- and operation-related emissions of ROG, NOX, PM2.5, and PM10 would be less than significant. 3.c. Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project would not introduce any new long-term operational sources of TACs. Therefore, construction-related TACs will comprise the analysis of substantial pollutant concentrations. 31 In relation to air quality, sensitive receptors include infants and children, the elderly, people with illnesses, or others who are especially sensitive to the adverse health effects of air pollutants (discussed previously). Hospitals, schools, convalescent facilities, and residential housing are examples of land uses with populations who are sensitive to air quality impacts. Existing sensitive receptors include residences to the north, south, east, and west of the Project Site. In addition, Vail Elementary School and Temecula Elementary School are sensitive receptors located approximately 0.2 mile southwest and 0.3 mile northwest of the Project Site, respectively. Construction-related activities would result in temporary, intermittent emissions of diesel particulate matter (PM) from the exhaust of heavy-duty off-road diesel equipment used for construction of the Project. On-road, diesel-powered haul trucks traveling to and from the Project Site during construction to deliver materials and equipment would not operate at a single location for extended periods and therefore would not expose a sensitive receptor to excessive diesel PM emissions. This analysis focuses primarily on heavy duty construction equipment used on-site that may affect nearby off-site land uses. Particulate exhaust emissions from diesel-fueled engines (i.e., diesel PM) were identified as a TAC by CARB in 1998. The potential cancer risk from inhaling diesel PM outweighs the potential for all other diesel PM-related health impacts (i.e., noncancer chronic risk, short-term acute risk) and health impacts from other TACs (CARB, 2015). Chronic and acute exposure to noncarcinogens is expressed as a hazard index, which is the ratio of expected exposure levels to an acceptable reference exposure level. As shown in Table 3-1 above, maximum daily exhaust emissions of PM10, which is considered a surrogate for diesel PM, would be up to 7.55 lbs./day during construction. The dose to which receptors are exposed is the primary factor used to determine health risk (i.e., potential exposure to TAC levels that exceed applicable standards). Dose is a function of the concentration of a substance in the environment and the duration of exposure to the substance. It is positively correlated with time, meaning that a longer exposure period would result in a higher exposure level for any exposed receptor. Thus, the risks estimated for an exposed individual are higher if the exposure occurs over a longer period. According to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA), HRAs, which determine the exposure of sensitive receptors to TACs, should be based on a 70- or 30-year exposure period; however, such assessments should be limited to the period/duration of activities associated with the project (OEHHA, 2015). For this reason, it is important to consider that the use of heavy-duty off-road diesel equipment would be limited to a 24-month construction period. In addition, studies show that diesel PM is highly dispersive and that concentrations of diesel PM decline with distance from the source (e.g., 500 feet from a freeway, the concentration of diesel PM decreases by 70 percent) (CARB, 2005). Considering the highly dispersive properties of diesel PM, the relatively low mass of diesel PM emissions that would be generated during project construction, and the relatively short period during which diesel PM-emitting construction activity would take place in the same location near the same receptors, it is anticipated construction-related TACs would not expose sensitive receptors to an incremental increase in cancer risk that exceeds 10 in one million or a hazard index of 1.0 or greater. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 3.d. Less Than Significant Impact. Odors are typically associated with industrial activities involving the use of chemicals, solvents, petroleum products, and other strong-smelling elements used in manufacturing processes. Odors are also associated with such uses as sewage treatment facilities and landfills. Implementation of the Project would result in the future development of 134 apartment units. This use would not introduce any major odor- producing uses that would have the potential to affect a substantial number of people. It is expected refuse generated from future development of the Project would be temporarily stored in covered containers and would be removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City’s solid waste regulations. Activities and materials associated with construction would be typical of construction projects of similar type and size. Any odors that may be generated during construction of future development of the Project would be localized and would not be sufficient to affect a substantial number of people or result in a nuisance as defined by SCAQMD Rule 402. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 32 References: CAPCOA. (2016). CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Retrieved from California Air Pollution Control Officers Association: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. CARB. (2005, April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. CARB. (2015, March 17). User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. CARB. (2019). Maps of State and Federal Area Designations. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations. OEHHA. (2015, February). Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Retrieved from Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. SCAQMD. (2017, March). Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management- plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=15. SCAQMD. (2019, April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality- significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2.%20Accessed%20November%2012,%202019. 33 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c Have a substantial adverse effect on state or federally protected wetlands (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X Comments: 4.a. No Impact. Although there is potential for special-status plant or animal species to occur within the Project Site based on geographical range, the Project Site has been previously rough graded and does not contain any suitable habitat for special-status species. Therefore, the Project would not have a substantial adverse effect on a candidate, sensitive, or special-status species and there would be no impact. 4.b and c. No Impact. Riparian habitats are those habitats located along banks or rivers or streams. Sensitive natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW), or local regulatory agencies; that are known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species; or are known to be significant wildlife corridors. Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands include swamps, marshes, bogs, mudflats, and vernal pools. The Project Site has been previously rough graded and is currently vacant. The Project Site does not contain any sensitive natural communities. In addition, no surface waters or state or federally protected wetlands, as shown on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Mapper (2021), were identified within the project site. Therefore, there would be no impact. 4.d. No Impact. The Project Site is not within a wildlife corridor and does not serve as a native wildlife nursery site. In addition, the study area does not contain any vegetation that could provide suitable habitat for nesting birds 34 protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. Therefore, the project is not anticipated to affect wildlife movement through the area and there would be no impact. 4.e. No Impact. The City’s Heritage Tree Ordinance (TMC Chapter 8.48) protects heritage trees, which include Oak, California Bay Laurel, California Black Walnut, California Holly, and California Sycamore trees, as well as other trees of special significance to the community. The Project Site has been previously rough graded and does not contain any trees or other locally protected biological resources. Therefore, there would be no impact. 4.f. No Impact. The Project Site is within the boundaries of the Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority (RCA) Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) (RCA, 2018). However, the Project Site is not located within a Criteria Cell identified by the MSHCP or within MSHCP conserved lands. In addition, the Project Site is not located within a survey area for amphibians, owls, criteria area species, mammals, narrow endemic plants, or invertebrates. As a result, the RCA is not required to review the Project. Furthermore, the Project Site has been previously rough graded and does not contain any biological resources. Therefore, there would be no impact. References: RCA. (2018, November 5). RCA MSHCP Information Map. Retrieved from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority: https://wrcrca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a73e69d2a64d41c29ebd3acd67467abd. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (2021, May 1). Wetlands Mapper. Retrieved from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/Mapper.html. 35 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource pursuant to §15064.5? X b Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? X c Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X Comments: 5.a. No Impact. A historical resource is defined in Section 15064.5(a)(3) of the CEQA Guidelines as any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript determined to be historically significant or significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California. Historical resources are further defined as being associated with significant events, important persons, or distinctive characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; representing the work of an important creative individual; possessing high artistic values; or yielding information important in prehistory or history. Resources listed in or determined eligible for the California Register of Historical Resources, included in a local register, or identified as significant in a historic resource survey are also considered historical resources under CEQA. The Project Site is currently vacant and is surrounded by recent residential developments. The Project Site has been previously rough graded and contains temporary construction trailers; there are no permanent structures on-site. According to Figure OS-2 of the City General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element (City of Temecula, 2005b), the Project Site is not located near a historical structure or historic site. Therefore, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource; there would be no impact. 5.b. No Impact. Section 15064.5(a)(3)(D) of the State CEQA Guidelines generally defines archaeological resources as any resource that “has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history.” Archaeological resources are features, such as tools, utensils, carvings, fabric, building foundations, etc., that document evidence of past human endeavors and that may be historically or culturally important to a significant earlier community. The Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded. Based on the subsurface investigation completed for the Geotechnical Evaluation (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), engineered artificial fill was encountered at the surface and extended to relatively shallow depths (approximately 5 feet bgs). Because excavation would be limited to approximately 3 feet bgs and entirely within artificial fill, impacts on archaeological resources are not anticipated during Project construction. Project operation would not involve ground-disturbing activities that would adversely affect an archaeological resource. Therefore, there would be no impact. 5.c. Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed under Response 5.b., the Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded. Project construction would require excavation that would be limited to 3 feet bgs and entirely within artificial fill. Therefore, it is not anticipated that Project construction would disturb previously unknown human remains. In the unlikely event that human remains are unearthed during ground-disturbing activities, State Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 states that no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made the necessary findings as to origin. Further, pursuant to Public Resource Code Section 5097.98(b) remains shall be left in place and free from disturbance until a final decision as to the treatment and disposition has been made. The project applicant shall comply with provisions of Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. The Riverside County Coroner shall be notified immediately upon discovery of human remains. If the remains 36 are determined to be human remains, the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) shall be notified as per the Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, subdivision (c), and Public Resources Code 5097.98. In accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 the NAHC would determine and notify the Most Likely Descendant. The most likely descendant shall then make recommendations and engage in consultation concerning the treatment of the remains as provided in Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. Compliance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and California Public Resources Code Section 5097 would provide an opportunity to avoid or minimize the disturbance of human remains, and to appropriately treat any remains that are discovered. Project operation would not involve ground-disturbing activities that would have the potential to disturb human remains. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. References: City of Temecula. 1993. Temecula General Plan. Updated 2005, Open Space Conservation Element, Figure OS-2, Historic Structures and Sites, page OS-16. 37 6. ENERGY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in potentially significant environmental impact due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources, during project construction or operation? X b Conflict with or obstruct a state or local plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency? X 6.a. Less than Significant Impact. Energy resources, such as electrical power, would be consumed to construct and operate the Project. The demand would be largely supplied from existing electrical services in the vicinity of the Project Site. Levels of construction- and operation-related energy consumption by the project are measured in megawatt-hours (MWh) of electricity, million Btu (MMBtu) of natural gas, and gallons of gasoline and diesel fuel. Energy Calculations are included in Appendix A. Energy consumption estimates were calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2 computer program (CAPCOA, 2016). Construction fuel consumption was calculated for CalEEMod default heavy-duty construction equipment based on anticipated daily usage (hours per day), days used, and worker commute trip VMT. For a conservative approach, the modeling assumes non-phased material import/export (i.e., the trucks would import/export material only one way). Yearly operational MWh of electricity and MMBtu of natural gas consumption were derived from CalEEMod defaults for the modeled land use. Operational diesel and gasoline consumption was calculated using CARB’s 2017 EMissions FACtor (EMFAC) model and annual project-generated VMT. Since the Project is not anticipating employing any full-time equivalent staff, the commercial VMT is assumed to be zero. Where project-specific information was not known, CalEEMod default values based on the Project’s location were used. Table 6-1 summarizes the levels of energy consumption for each phase of construction and Table 6-2 summarizes the levels of energy consumption for the first year of operation during the buildout year of 2024. Table 6-3 summarizes the gasoline and diesel consumption estimated for the project in 2024. See Appendix A for more calculations and assumptions. Table 6-1 Construction Energy Consumption Year Diesel (Gallons) Gasoline (Gallons) 2022 218,131 15,734 2023 19,376 18,540 Total 237,507 34,275 Notes: Gasoline gallons include on-road gallons from worker trips. Diesel gallons include off-road equipment and on-road gallons from worker and vendor trips. Source: Calculations by Ascent Environmental in 2021. See Appendix A for more calculations and assumptions. Table 6-2 Operational Energy Consumption Land Use/Energy Type Energy Consumption Units Congregate Care Electricity 654 MWh/year Natural Gas 1695 MMBtu/year Notes: MWh/year = megawatt-hours per year; MMBtu/year = million British thermal units per year. Source: Calculations by Ascent Environmental in 2021. See Appendix A for more calculations and assumptions. 38 Table 6-3 Gasoline and Diesel Consumption in 2024 Vehicle Category Gasoline (gal/year) Diesel (gal/year) Passenger Vehicles 280 42,800 Trucks 37,898 39,036 Buses 411 625 Other Vehicles 64 296 Total (All Vehicle Types) 38,653 82,757 Notes: gal/year = gallons per year. Source: Calculations by Ascent Environmental in 2021. See Appendix A for more calculations and assumptions. A project that could introduce substantial energy demand such that additional energy-related infrastructure and facilities (e.g., power plant) would need to be built and would result in physical environmental effects would be considered a significant energy impact. The energy needs for the Project Site are served by SoCalGas (gas) and SCE (electricity). During construction, the Project would require energy for haul trips, equipment use, and worker commute trips. Equipment and vehicles would primarily be powered by diesel fuel and would likely require minimal electricity. The fuel consumption from construction vehicles and equipment would be temporary and would represent a negligible increase in regional energy consumption. Best management practices to reduce air pollutant emissions would be implemented during construction activities, which would contribute to reductions in energy consumption. Idling would be limited to 5 minutes or less and construction equipment would be maintained per manufacturer’s specifications. Furthermore, construction activities would comply with CalGreen requirements, which include mandatory construction and demolition recycling. Once operational, energy would be required to power on-site buildings. The Project design would be required to comply with the City’s Sustainability Plan (City of Temecula, 2010) and California’s Building Standards Code, including CalGreen requirements (Title 24, Part 11). Project sustainability features would include the following:  Energy efficient building materials, appliances, lighting and mechanical systems, and water efficient plumbing systems  Solar panels on the roofs of the apartment buildings  Electric conduit for future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS)  Bicycle parking  Real-time energy monitors to track energy use  New sidewalks and paving with high solar reflectivity materials  City-issued water meters that track real time water use with data logging equipment if necessary  Low water irrigation systems and landscaping The increased energy demand from Project implementation would not be substantial such that new energy-related infrastructure and facilities would need to be constructed. The existing power supply and associated infrastructure of SoCalGas and SCE would be capable of satisfying new energy demand generated by the Project. For this reason, energy consumption under the Project would not be “wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary.” Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 6.b. Less than Significant Impact. See Response 6.a. As discussed above, Project construction and design would be required to comply with the City’s Sustainability Plan (City of Temecula, 2010) and California’s Building Standards Code, including CalGreen requirements (Title 24, Part 11). Therefore, the Project would not conflict with a state or regional plan related to the increased use of renewable energy or improved energy efficiency. Impacts would be less than significant. 39 References: CAPCOA. (2016). CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Retrieved from California Air Pollution Control Officers Association: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. City of Temecula. (2010, June 22). Sustainability Plan. Retrieved from City of Temecula: http://laserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink/2/doc/241368/Electronic.aspx. 40 7. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Directly or indirectly cause potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: X i. Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii. Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii. Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv. Landslides? X b Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? X f Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X Comments: 7.a.i. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is within the seismically active region of Southern California. Ground shaking occurs from numerous faults within the region. Faults originate over long periods of time when the earth’s crust is fractured because of uneven rock movements along a line. A fault trace is the line on the earth’s surfacing which defines a fault. Due to the location of the Project, fault rupture and consequent ground shaking activities are expected to occur over the lifetime of the Project. According to Figure PS-1 of the City General Plan Public Safety Element (City of Temecula, 2005d), the City of Temecula contains one active fault, the Elsinore fault, approximately 0.6 mile west of the Project Site. Faults nearby the City include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport-Inglewood, Sierra Madre-Santa Susana- Cucamonga, Rose Canyon, Coronado Banks, San Diego Trough, and San Clemente Island faults. The California Geological Survey (CGS) identifies and defines active earthquake fault zones to assist with planning, zoning, and creation of building codes to reduce seismic risks. According to the CGS, the Project Site does not contain any known faults and is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (CGS, 2019). Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to the rupture of a known earthquake fault. 7.a.ii. Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed under Response 7.a.i., the City contains one active fault, the Elsinore fault, which traverses the City and has historically experienced earthquakes of moderate magnitude. Other nearby faults to the City include the San Andreas, San Jacinto, San Gabriel, Newport-Inglewood, Sierra Madre-Santa Susana- Cucamonga, Rose Canyon, Coronado Banks, San Diego Trough, and San Clemente Island faults. Thus, the Project Site 41 would be subject to shaking during earthquake events. Due to the Project’s location and proximity to several fault lines, it is likely that ground shaking events would occur during the lifetime of the Project. Construction and building design of the Project is subject to the City’s Building Code, which incorporates the 2019 California Building Code (CBC) standards. The City’s Building Code and the 2019 CBC requires implementation of seismic design standards to reduce seismically induced risks. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to strong seismic ground shaking. 7.a.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction is a phenomenon that occurs when a high-intensity seismic event causes loose, saturated, granular soils to act as a fluid. Factors that influence liquefaction potential include depth of groundwater, composition of soils, and intensity and duration of ground shaking. According to CGS, portions of the Project Site are within a liquefaction zone (CGS, 2019). Based on the Geotechnical Evaluation for the Project (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), there is low probability of liquefaction, seismically induced settlement, and lateral spreading at the Project Site because of the lack of shallow groundwater and the presence of formational materials at shallow depths underlying the recently placed engineered fill at the Project Site. Furthermore, adherence to the City’s Building Code and 2019 CBC would reduce the likelihood of impacts from seismic-related ground failure, which include liquefaction. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to liquefaction. 7.a.iv. No Impact. According to CGS, the Project Site is not within a landslide zone (CGS, 2019). The Project Site is relatively flat, with gentle perimeter fill slopes and a drainage ditch that transect the northwestern corner of the property. Based on the Geotechnical Evaluation (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), there is negligible potential for landslides or slope instabilities to occur at the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would have no impact related to landslides. 7.b. Less Than Significant Impact. Soil erosion refers to the process by which soil or earth material is loosened or dissolved and removed from its original location. Erosion can occur by varying processes and may occur in the Project Site where bare soil is exposed to wind or moving water (both rainfall and surface runoff). The processes of erosion are generally a function of material type, terrain steepness, rainfall or irrigation levels, surface drainage conditions, and general land uses. The Project Site is within the jurisdiction of the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (SDRWQCB) and the Project would be subject to all existing regulations associated with the protection of water quality, including erosion and sediment control. All projects that result in a disturbance area of more than 1 acre (43,560 square feet) are required to obtain coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009- DWQ). The Construction General Permit requires the development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which includes BMPs for erosion and sediment control. The existing Project site consists of approximately 9.5 acres of pervious surface area. Project-related construction activities that include ground surface disruption such as excavation, grading, and trenching would increase the potential for erosion to occur. As discussed in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project would result in a disturbed area of 414,028 square feet (approximately 9.5 acres); therefore, the Project must comply with the requirements of the Construction General Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. The Project would require preparation of a SWPPP with BMPs to control erosion. In addition, the Project would include construction BMPs necessary to comply with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (TMC Chapter 18.18 et seq.) and the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual (TMC Chapter 18) (City of Temecula, 2020a). Furthermore, the Project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), which requires daily watering of unpaved areas to stabilize soil and prevent wind erosion events. Once operational, the Project Site would consist of approximately 4.76 acres of impervious area (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots) and 4.74 acres of pervious area. The Project design would be consistent with the Riverside County Low Impact Development (LID) Manual (Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District, 2011) and the City’s BMP Design Manual (City of Temecula, 2018a). As described in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 42 2021b), the Project design would include BMPs to reduce erosion from operational runoff, such as an infiltration/detention pipe system to collect runoff from paved areas and landscaping to stabilize soils in unpaved areas. With adherence to applicable rules and regulations and implementation of BMPs and LID practices, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to erosion and topsoil. 7.c. Less Than Significant Impact. Subsidence is the sudden collapse of the ground’s surface that occurs because of a subsurface gap or void. Subsidence is typically caused by withdrawal of groundwater or oil resources or wells beneath a surface. According to the California Geologic Energy Management Division (CalGEM), there are no groundwater or oil wells within the Project Site (CalGEM, 2019); therefore, subsidence is not expected to occur. In addition, as previously discussed under Responses 7.a.iii and 7.a.iv above, there is low potential for liquefaction or landslides to occur on the Project Site. Project design would be consistent with the 2019 CBC requirements, which would reduce impacts from on- or off-site landslides, lateral spreading, subsidence, or collapse. Therefore, development of the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to stability hazards. 7.d. Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils are typically associated with fine-grained clayey soils that have the potential to shrink and swell with repeated cycles of wetting and drying. Based on the Geotechnical Evaluation (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), the near surface on-site soils are anticipated to have a low to moderate expansion potential and hazards related to expansive soil are not anticipated. Although not anticipated, expansive soils, if encountered within the Project Site, would be removed and/or replaced as part of standard construction practices pursuant to the City and 2019 CBC building requirements. Therefore, development of the Project would result in less than significant impacts associated with expansive soils and substantial risks to life or property would not occur. 7.e. No Impact. Septic tanks or other similar alternative wastewater disposal systems are not proposed under the Project. Therefore, no impact would occur. 7.f. No Impact. The Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded. Based on the subsurface investigation completed for the Geotechnical Evaluation (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), engineered artificial fill was encountered at the surface and extended to relatively shallow depths (approximately 5 feet bgs) overlying Pleistocene-age Pauba Formation sandstone. Because excavation activities would be limited to approximately 3 feet bgs and entirely within artificial fill, impacts on paleontological resources are not anticipated during Project construction. Project operation would not involve ground-disturbing activities that would directly or indirectly destroy a unique geologic feature. Therefore, there would be no impact. References: CalGEM. (2019). Well Finder. Retrieved from CalGEM GIS: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx. CGS. (2019, April 4). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Retrieved from California Geological Survey: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. City of Temecula. (2005d). Public Safety Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/288/Public-Safety-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2018, July). Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5698/Temecula--BMP-Design-Manual. City of Temecula. (2020, December). City of Temecula Engineering & Construction Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3083/Engineering-and-Construction-Manual. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021b). City of Temecula Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Temecula Village - Parcel 8 (Phase 2). Anaheim Hills. EEI Engineering Solutions. (2019). Geotechnical Evaluation. Carlsbad. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District. (2011). Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Riverside. 43 8. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b Conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The Project Site is within the western portion of Riverside County, which is in the SCAB. SCAQMD serves as the air district that regulates emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) within the SCAB. In 2008, SCAQMD released draft guidance that recommended construction GHG emissions be amortized over a project’s 30-year lifetime to include these emissions as part of a project’s annualized lifetime total emissions (SCAQMD, 2008). This guidance enhances the role of mitigation measures, if required, to address construction GHG emissions as part of the operational GHG reduction strategies. In accordance with this draft methodology, the estimated construction GHG emissions have been amortized over a 30-year period and are included in the annualized operational GHG emissions, discussed later in this section. GHG emissions shown in Table 8-1 are based on construction equipment operating continuously throughout the workday. In reality, construction equipment tends to operate periodically or cyclically throughout the workday. Therefore, the GHG emissions shown reflect a conservative estimate. A listing of the construction equipment by phase, construction schedule, emission factors, and calculation parameters used in this analysis is included within the emissions calculation worksheets that are provided in Appendix A. Also, in 2008, SCAQMD’s Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for an interim GHG significance threshold of 10,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year for stationary sources. The Project is comprised of a residential land use and would not be subject to such a threshold. SCAQMD is in the process of developing a new CEQA guidance document to replace the existing CEQA Air Quality Handbook adopted in 1993. In 2009, SCAQMD proposed a mass emissions GHG threshold that could be applied to project-level CEQA evaluation. Based on a review of 711 projects within SCAQMD’s jurisdiction, SCAQMD found that stationary sources comprised 90 percent of total GHG emissions. In the wake of this finding, SCAQMD recommended the use of a 3,000 MTCO2e/year mass emissions threshold to evaluate global climate change impacts during project-level environmental review for combined land use types. Guidance provided by SCAQMD indicates that a project would result in a potentially significant climate change impact if a residential project would generate construction- and operational-related GHG emissions in exceedance of 3,000 MTCO2e per year (SCAQMD, 2009). 8.a. Less than Significant Impact. Construction and operation of the Project would increase GHG emissions which have the potential to cumulatively result in a significant impact on the environment. Construction-related activities that would generate GHG emissions include operation of heavy-duty equipment and work commute vehicle trips to and from the Project Site. Operation of the Project would result in GHG emissions from vehicle trips accessing the Project site (mobile sector), electricity and natural gas combustion (energy sector), operation of landscaping equipment (area sector), treatment of water and wastewater (water sector), and decomposition of solid wastes at landfills (solid waste sector). Emissions from these sectors and from construction-related activities were modeled using CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2 (Appendix A). The results of the GHG emissions calculations are presented in Table 8-1. 44 Table 8-1 Annual Construction and Operational Emissions of Greenhouse Gases for the Project (2024) Source MTCO2e/year Mobile 1,160 Energy 132 Area 48 Water and Wastewater 27 Solid Waste 36 Construction1 33 Total 1,436 SCAQMD Significance Criteria 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No Notes: Values are rounded off, MTCO2e/year = metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year, SCAQMD = South Coast Air Quality Management District 1 Total construction emissions during the Project’s 24-month construction period was amortized over a 30-year period consistent with guidance provided by SCAQMD. Source: Modeling conducted by Ascent Environmental in April 2021 using CalEEMod v. 2016.3.2 As shown above in Table 8-1, the project would generate 33 MTCO2e/year from construction and 1,403 MTCO2e/year from operations. This level of emissions would be less than SCAQMD’s recommended mass emissions threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e/year for residential land use projects. As discussed under Response 6.a., the Project would be designed in compliance with CalGreen requirements. Project sustainability features that would contribute to reductions in GHG emissions would include the following:  Energy efficient building materials, appliances, lighting and mechanical systems, and water efficient plumbing systems  Solar panels on the roofs of the apartment buildings  Electric conduit for future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS)  Bicycle parking  Real-time energy monitors to track energy use  New sidewalks and paving with high solar reflectivity materials  City-issued water meters that track real time water use with data logging equipment if necessary  Low water irrigation systems and landscaping In addition, best management practices to reduce GHG emissions would be implemented during construction activities, which include limiting idling to 5 minutes or less and maintaining construction equipment per manufacturer’s specifications. Furthermore, construction activities would comply with CalGreen requirements, which include mandatory construction and demolition recycling. The GHG reductions achieved through several of these measures are not represented in the estimate provided in Table 8-1. Therefore, the estimated 1,436 MTCO2e/year in 2024 is a conservative value. Based on the above discussion, construction and operation of the Project would not result in a significant climate change impact. This impact would be less than significant. 8.b. Less than Significant Impact. California has adopted multiple statewide GHG reduction mandates, regulations, policies, and plans to reduce the state’s contribution of GHG emissions to minimize the adverse impacts of global, 45 anthropogenic climate change. Because no one project is solely responsible for global climate change, GHG impacts are inherently cumulative impacts. The GHG emissions associated with construction and operation of the Project would be 1,436 MTCO2e/year, as shown in Table 8-1. The Project would result in a significant impact if it would generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may conflict with applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions, as discussed in CARB’s 2017 California Climate Change Scoping Plan (2017 Scoping Plan), Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG’s) Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), and the City of Temecula’s Sustainability Plan. The Project’s consistency with these plans is discussed in the following sections. 2017 Scoping Plan The 2017 Scoping Plan identifies how the State can reach its 2030 climate target to reduce GHG emissions by 40 percent from 1990 levels, and substantially advance toward its 2050 climate goal to reduce GHG emissions by 80 percent below 1990 levels. Several GHG reduction actions are identified in the 2017 Scoping Plan, which include direct regulations, market-based compliance mechanisms such as the state’s Cap-and-Trade Program, incentives, voluntary actions, and local initiatives. The 2017 Scoping Plan indicates that statewide GHG emission reductions will need to be achieved through local planning efforts that “promote vibrant communities and landscapes through better planning efforts to curb vehicle-miles-traveled and increase walking, biking and transit” (CARB, 2017). The Project Site is within a residential area in the City of Temecula and is considered infill development. Route 24 of the Riverside Transit Agency (RTA) currently operates on Rancho California Road and would likely serve the Project Site. Route 24 provides transit service to several major attractions within the City of Temecula, including the Pechanga Resort, Temecula Valley Hospital, the Old Town Temecula district, the Palomar Village shopping center, and Promenade Mall. The Project’s urban location and proximity of public transit may contribute to reduced VMT when compared to a project of similar size and land use in a more remote location. In addition, the Project includes bicycle parking, which would incentivize bicycling and contribute to reductions in VMT. Furthermore, as discussed above, the Project design would incorporate sustainability features consistent with CalGreen requirements. Based on the above discussion, the Project would be consistent with the state’s strategies to reduce GHG emissions that are presented in the 2017 Scoping Plan. In addition to the Project’s consistency with applicable GHG reduction strategies, the Project would not conflict with the future anticipated statewide GHG reductions goals. CARB has outlined several potential strategies for achieving the 2030 reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels. These potential strategies include renewable resources for half of the state’s electricity by 2030, increasing the fuel economy of vehicles and the number of zero-emission or hybrid vehicles, reducing the rate of growth in VMT, supporting high-speed rail and other alternative transportation options, and use of high-efficiency appliances, water heaters, and HVAC systems. The Project would not conflict with statewide and utility-provider efforts towards increasing the portion of electricity provided from renewable resources. The Project would be served by SCE for electricity, and SCE has committed to achieving 50 percent renewables by 2025. The Project’s GHG emissions would decline in future years as a greater percentage of SCE-provided electricity would come from renewable sources. While CARB is in the process of developing a framework for the 2030 reduction target in the 2017 Scoping Plan, the Project would support and not impede implementation of these potential reduction strategies to be identified by CARB. Connect SoCal – 2020 -2045 RTP/SCS Connect SoCal, SCAG’s 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, is a long-range visioning plan that builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. The plan encompasses the counties of Imperial, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino, and Ventura. The purpose of Connect SoCal is to achieve the regional per capita GHG reduction targets for the passenger-vehicle and light-duty truck sector established by CARB pursuant to SB 375. Connect SoCal identifies land use strategies to support GHG reductions, which include (1) emphasizing land use patterns that facilitate multimodal access to work, educational, and other destinations; (2) planning for growth near transit investments and supporting implementation of first/last mile strategies; and (3) prioritizing infill and redevelopment of underutilized land to accommodate new growth and increasing amenities and connectivity in existing neighborhoods (SCAG, 2020). 46 As shown in Table 8-1, transportation-related GHG emissions contribute to the largest sector of emissions from the Project. This finding is consistent with the findings in many regional plans, such as Connect SoCal, which recognizes that the transportation sector is the largest contributor to the state’s GHG emissions. Consistent with Connect SoCal’s alignment of transportation, land use, and housing strategies, the Project would accommodate projected growth and associated transportation demand by implementing smart land use strategies. The Project is considered an infill development within an existing residential area and in proximity to commercial shopping centers. There are two bus stops for RTA’s Route 24 within 500 feet of the Project Site. Route 24 provides transit service to several major attractions within the City of Temecula, including the Pechanga Resort, Temecula Valley Hospital, the Old Town Temecula district, the Palomar Village shopping center, and Promenade Mall. The Project’s proximity to bus stops and commercial centers would encourage the use of multi-modal transportation. Furthermore, the Project design incorporates features to encourage reductions in transportation-related GHG emissions, including sidewalk improvements, bicycle parking, and connections to future EVCS. Therefore, the Project is consistent with Connect SoCal’s land use strategies to support GHG reductions. City of Temecula Sustainability Plan The City of Temecula Sustainability Plan was adopted in June 2010 to identify and address current and future climate change goals (City of Temecula, 2010). The Sustainability Plan includes several goals for reducing GHG emissions through energy and water efficiency, waste reduction, and embracing cleaner technology. The Sustainability Plan incorporates the following goals which would be applicable to the Project:  Reduce energy consumption throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs that support this goal.  Support the use of clean energy throughout the community through use of the latest technology, practices, and programs.  Reduce total waste generated and reduce the use and release of household hazardous waste.  Distribute trip types among all modes of transportation (vehicle, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, etc.). As discussed above, the Project would include sustainability features consistent with CalGreen requirements (e.g., solar panels, EVCS connections, water efficient landscaping). In addition, construction activities would be subject to BMPs for reducing GHG emissions, including idling time limits and maintaining construction equipment. As discussed in Section 19, Utilities and Service Systems, the Project would comply with mandatory construction and demolition recycling requirements to reduce solid waste generated from construction activities. In addition, as discussed in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, the project would reduce the use and release of household hazardous waste in accordance with state and federal regulations regarding hazardous materials. Furthermore, as discussed above, the Project Site is in proximity to existing public transit and would encourage multi-modal transportation. Therefore, the Project is consistent with the GHG reduction goals outlined in the City’s Sustainability Plan. Based on the discussion above, the Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. References: CARB. (2017, November). California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. City of Temecula. (2010, June 22). Sustainability Plan. Retrieved from City of Temecula: http://laserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink/2/doc/241368/Electronic.aspx. SCAG. (2020, September 3). Connect SoCal: The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments. Retrieved from Southern California Association of Governments: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal-plan_0.pdf?1606001176. 47 SCAQMD. (2008, October). Draft Guidance Document - Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf. SCAQMD. (2009, November 19). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg- meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. 48 9. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X d Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard or excessive noise for people residing or working in the project area? X f Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X g Expose people or structures, either directly or indirectly, to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires? X Comments: 9.a. Less Than Significant Impact. A hazardous material is defined as any material that due to its quantity, concentration, physical or chemical characteristics, poses a significant present or potential hazard to human health or to the environment if released. Project-related construction and operation activities would involve the temporary use, transport, and construction of hazardous materials in the form of inorganic and organic chemicals, solvents, mercury, lead, asbestos, paints, oil, gasoline, cleansers, or pesticides. However, the construction-related transport, use storage, and disposal of hazardous materials would be temporary, occurring over 20 to 24 months. All materials would be used, stored, and disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and manufacturers’ instructions. Furthermore, any emissions from the use of such materials would be temporary in nature and localized to the Project Site. Once constructed, the ongoing operational characteristics would not involve the type of activities that often give rise to concerns regarding hazardous materials. A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) has been prepared for the Project by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. on September 6, 2017 and included as Appendix C of this Final IS/ND. The Phase I ESA determined that no recognized environmental conditions (REC), controlled recognized environmental conditions (CREC), or historical recognized environmental conditions (HREC) were present on the Project Site (Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2017). Therefore, neither Project construction nor operation would create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials and impacts would be less than significant. 49 9.b. Less Than Significant Impact. Project-related construction and operation activities would involve the temporary use, transport, and construction of hazardous materials in the form of inorganic and organic chemicals, solvents, mercury, lead, asbestos, paints, oil, gasoline, cleansers, or pesticides. Construction of the Project would temporarily increase the use of typical construction materials at the Project Site, including concrete, hydraulic fluids, paints, cleaning materials, and vehicle fuels. The use of these materials during construction would be short-term in nature, occurring over 20 to 24 months, and would be required to comply with federal, state, County, and City regulations relating to control of hazardous materials. Compliance with these regulations would reduce the likelihood of accidents and risks associated with release of hazardous materials. Potentially hazardous materials would be contained, stored, and used in accordance with manufacturers’ instructions and handled in compliance with applicable standards and regulations. One constructed, the ongoing operational characteristics would not involve the type of activities that often give rise to concerns regarding hazardous materials. As discussed in Response 9.a. above, the Phase I ESA assessment determined that no RECs, CRECs, or HRECs were present on the Project Site (Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2017). Therefore, neither construction nor operation of the Project is anticipated to create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment and impacts would be less than significant. 9.c. Less Than Significant Impact. Vail Elementary School, located approximately 0.2 mile southwest of the Project Site, is the only school within one-quarter mile of the Project Site. Project construction would involve the temporary use of hazardous substances in the form of paint, adhesives, surface coatings and other finishing materials, and cleaning agents, fuels, and oils. The Project would adhere to existing regulations and compliance with the safety procedures mandated by applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations, which would minimize the risks resulting from handling of hazardous materials within one-quarter mile of a school. In addition, any emissions from the use of such materials would be temporary and localized to the Project Site. Project-related operational activities would require the use and storage of small quantities of potentially hazardous materials such as cleaning solvents, painting supplies, and pesticides and fertilizers for landscaping. These materials would be used in small quantities and in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions for use, storage, and disposal of such products. As with construction, any emissions from the use of such materials regarding the operation of the Project would be minimal and localized to the Project Site. Use of these materials on-site would not pose a risk to schools in the Project vicinity because there would be minimal emissions and any emissions would be localized to the Project Site. Therefore, development of the Project would result in less than significant impacts regarding hazardous materials at any existing or proposed schools within one-quarter mile of the Project Site. 9.d. No Impact. Government Code Section 65962.5, amended in 1992, requires the California Environmental Protection Agency (CalEPA) to develop and update annually the Cortese List, which is a list of hazardous waste sites and other contaminated sites. According to the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) EnviroStor database, no hazardous materials sites included on the Cortese List are located within the Project Site or within a 1,000-foot radius of the Project Site (DTSC, 2021). Therefore, the Project would have no impact related to hazardous materials sites. 9.e. No Impact. According to Figure LU-2 of the City General Plan Land Use Element (City of Temecula, 2005e), the Project Site is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The closest airport is the French Valley Airport, located at 37600 Sky Canyon Drive in the City of Murrieta, approximately 4.0 miles northeast of the Project Site. Therefore, there would be no impact. 9.f. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is in an urban area with an established roadway network. The surrounding roadways provide adequate circulation and access for emergency response. Project-related construction activities have the potential to result in short-term, temporary impacts to surrounding roadways from partial lane closures or the presence of construction vehicles, which may cause temporary traffic slowdown. Any impacts associated with construction activities would be temporary in nature and would be generally confined to the Project Site. The Project would not affect access on any major roadways that may serve as emergency evacuation routes for 50 the region, such as I-15 or SR 79. All construction activities would be subject to emergency access standards and requirements of the Temecula Fire Department to ensure traffic safety. Emergency access to the Project site would be provided from Rancho California Road and the final site plan would be subject to approval by the Temecula Fire Department. Adequate emergency access would be maintained with implementation of the Project. The Project would not permanently modify any roads, result in permanent road closures, or otherwise affect emergency response times. Therefore, the Project would not impair or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Project impacts would be less than significant. 9.g. No Impact. The Project Site is in a developed urban area; it has been previously rough graded and does not contain large vegetation. The Project Site is not classified as a very high hazard severity zone (VHFHSZ) (Cal Fire, 2009) and is not located near or within a California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (Cal Fire) designated state responsibility area (SRA) (Cal Fire, 2007). The closest very VHFHSZ is located approximately 1.4 miles southwest of the Project Site and the closest SRA is located approximately 2.3 miles east of the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would have no impact related to wildland fires. References: Cal Fire. (2007, November 7). Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area - Western Riverside County. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs_map60.pdf. Cal Fire. (2009, December 21). Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area (LRA) as Recommended by Cal Fire - Temecula. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5924/temecula.pdf. City of Temecula. 1993. Temecula General Plan. Updated 2005, Land Use Element, Figure LU-2, French Valley Airport Land Use Compatibility Zones, page LU-7. DTSC. (2021). EnviroStor. Retrieved from California Department of Toxic Substances Control: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. 51 10. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements or otherwise substantially degrade surface or groundwater quality? X b Substantially decrease groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that the project may impede sustainable groundwater management of the basin? X c Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river or through the addition of imperious surfaces, in a manner which would: X i) result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site; X ii) substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite; X iii) create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff; or X iv) impede or redirect flood flows? X d In flood hazard, tsunami, or seiche zones, risk release of pollutants due to project inundation? X e Conflict with or obstruct implementation of a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan? X Comments: 10.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is currently vacant and consists of approximately 9.5 acres of pervious surface area. Project implementation would introduce approximately 4.76 acres of impervious surfaces (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots) and 4.74 acres of pervious surfaces (i.e., landscaped areas). The Project is a Priority Development Project and has been designed consistent with the City’s BMP Design Manual, which includes onsite post-construction stormwater requirements (City of Temecula, 2018a). The BMP Design Manual was developed in compliance with the following requirements:  City of Temecula Stormwater and Urban Runoff Management and Discharge Controls Ordinance (TMC Chapter 8.28 et seq.)  Regional MS4 Permit (SDRWQCB Order No. R9-2013-0001 as amended by R9-2015-0001 and R9-2015-0100) requirements for stormwater management  City of Temecula Engineering and Construction Manual (City of Temecula, 2020a)  City of Temecula Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (TMC Chapter 18.18 et seq.) In accordance with the Project’s WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project includes source control BMPs to prevent illicit discharges into the MS4. These BMPs include reducing exposure of refuse areas, implementing sweeping and washing requirements for paved areas, stenciling or installing signage at storm drain inlets and catch basins, and screening trash enclosures. The Project also includes site design BMPs, such as maintaining existing drainage pathways and hydrologic features; minimizing impervious surface areas; and landscaping with a native and 52 drought tolerant species to minimize the use of irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides. BMPs that would be implemented during construction include hydroseeding and maintaining the existing on-site sediment desilting basins. Once operational, runoff from the Project Site would be conveyed through underground storm drain pipes and treated through a MaxWell drywell system (i.e., an infiltration/detention pipe system). The drywell system would remove sediment and debris from the site runoff, and the runoff would then be discharged into the soil about 20 feet below ground. Rows of 50-inch high-density polyethylene (HDPE) underground storm drain pipes would provide the treatment volume for the 85th Percentile 24-hour storm, while the drywells would be sized for a 36-hour drawdown time, per the City of Temecula Water Quality Management Plan guidelines. The drywell system would include a weir with an orifice at the outlet to discharge any additional volume from the site at a flowrate at or below the pre- developed condition. After being treated, the overflow runoff would discharge to the existing 30-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) under Rancho California Road. By complying with the WQMP requirements for a Priority Development Project, impacts related to violation of water quality standards and waste discharge requirements would be less than significant. 10.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is within the boundaries of the Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin (Basin), which spans approximately 87,800 acres in the counties of Riverside and San Diego (California Department of Water Resources, 2004). Average annual precipitation in the Basin ranges from 7 to 15 inches. Natural recharge of the Basin is from direct precipitation and percolation in the Warm Springs, Tucalota, Santa Gertrudis, Murrieta, and Pechanga Creeks and the Temecula River. The Basin is not critically overdrafted (i.e., the average annual amount of groundwater extraction exceeds the long-term average annual supply of water to the basin) (California Department of Water Resources, 2020). According to the Phase I ESA, the depth to groundwater in the vicinity of the Project Site is inferred to be approximately 80 feet bgs (Partner Engineering and Science, Inc., 2017). The Project Site was previously rough graded, and excavation is anticipated to be limited to a maximum depth of 3 feet bgs during Project construction. Therefore, it is not anticipated that groundwater would be encountered during ground-disturbing activities and dewatering would not be required. In a letter dated December 22, 2020, RCWD indicated that there is existing water service to the Project Site (see Appendix D). RCWD currently obtains water from the following primary water sources: (1) local groundwater from the Murrieta-Temecula Groundwater Basin; (2) imported State Water Project (SWP) and Colorado River water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWDSC) through the Eastern Municipal Water District (EMWD) and the Western Municipal Water District (WMWD); and (3) recycled water from both the District and EMWD facilities. The Water Facilities Master Plan (RCWD, 2015) predicts an additional annual groundwater capacity that will be generated through increasing artificial recharge of the groundwater basin by 22,443 acres feet per year (AFY). An additional annual supply of 5,319 AFY of recycled water is also anticipated by buildout. The full build-out annual capacity of the RCWD is anticipated to be 115,002 AFY and is greater than the projected build-out annual production requirement of 110,714 AFY. Project implementation would result in development of 134 apartment units on a currently vacant site. The Project would slightly increase the demand for water from RCWD, when compared with existing conditions. However, the Project is considered part of RCWD’s full build-out area. Therefore, the Project would be adequately served by the projected water supply for the RCWD and would not substantially decrease groundwater supplies. As discussed in Response 10.a., the Project would result in a net increase of 4.76 acres impervious surfaces within the Project Site (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots). The Project would be designed to promote stormwater infiltration and groundwater recharge. Runoff from the Project Site would be conveyed through underground storm drain pipes and treated through an infiltration/detention pipe system before infiltrating into the soil. Excess runoff would be discharged to the existing storm drain pipe system under Rancho California Road. Therefore, Project operation would not substantially interfere with groundwater recharge. Impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.i. Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response 7.b., the Project Site is within the jurisdiction of the SDRWQCB and the Project would be subject to all existing regulations associated with the protection of water quality. All projects that result in a disturbance area of more than 1 acre (43,560 square feet) are required to obtain coverage 53 under the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). The Construction General Permit requires the development of a Storm Water SWPPP, which includes BMPs for erosion and sediment control. The existing Project Site consists of approximately 9.5 acres of pervious surface area. Project-related construction activities that include ground surface disruption such as excavation, grading, and trenching would increase the potential for erosion to occur. As discussed in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project would result in a disturbed area of 414,028 square feet (approximately 9.5 acres); therefore, the Project must comply with the requirements of the Construction General Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. The Project would require preparation of a SWPPP with BMPs to control erosion. In addition, the Project would include construction BMPs necessary to comply with the City’s Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance (TMC Chapter 18.18 et seq.) and the City’s Engineering and Construction Manual (TMC Chapter 18) (City of Temecula, 2020a). Furthermore, the Project would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 (Fugitive Dust), which requires daily watering of unpaved areas to stabilize soil and prevent wind erosion events. Once operational, the Project Site would consist of approximately 4.76 acres of impervious area (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots) and 4.74 acres of pervious area. The Project design would be consistent with the Riverside County LID Manual (Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District, 2011) and the City’s BMP Design Manual (City of Temecula, 2018a). As described in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project design would include BMPs to reduce erosion from operational runoff, such as an infiltration/detention pipe system to collect runoff from paved areas and landscaping to stabilize soils in unpaved areas. With adherence to applicable rules and regulations and implementation of BMPs and LID practices, the Project would result in a less than significant impact related to erosion and siltation. 10.c.ii. Less Than Significant Impact. The majority of the Project Site currently drains to the north side of the property and ultimately discharges to the existing 30-inch public storm drain along Rancho California Road (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a). The Project Site currently experiences off-site run on from the east and south property lines. Once operational, the Project would result in a net increase of 4.76 acres impervious surfaces within the Project Site (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots). As demonstrated in the Project’s Hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a), stormwater discharge from the Project Site in the developed condition would be at or below the pre- developed condition for the modeled 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. Therefore, the existing 30-inch storm drain along Rancho California Road would have adequate capacity for anticipated stormwater runoff and the Project is not anticipated to worsen the existing flood condition at Rancho California Road. Furthermore, the Project would be designed in accordance with the City’s BMP Design Manual (City of Temecula, 2018a), as demonstrated in the Project’s WQMP. Runoff from the Project Site would be conveyed through underground storm drain pipes and treated through an infiltration/detention pipe system before infiltrating into the soil. Excess runoff would be discharged to the existing storm drain pipe system under Rancho California Road. Therefore, the Project would not substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or offsite. Impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.iii. Less Than Significant Impact. As discussed in Response 10.c.iii., stormwater discharge from the Project Site in the developed condition would be at or below the pre-developed condition for the modeled 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. As demonstrated in the Project’s Hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a), the existing 30-inch storm drain along Rancho California Road would have adequate capacity for anticipated stormwater runoff. Therefore, the Project would not create or contribute runoff water that would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems. A WQMP was prepared for the Project, as required by the City Stormwater Ordinance (TMC Title 8.28) and Jurisdictional Runoff Management Plan (City of Temecula, 2018c). As outlined in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), the Project includes site design BMPs, such as maintaining existing drainage pathways and hydrologic features; minimizing impervious surface areas; and landscaping with a native and drought tolerant species to minimize the use of irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides. These BMPs would reduce sources of polluted runoff during Project operation. 54 As discussed in Response 10.c.i., a SWPPP would be developed for the Project, which would include construction BMPs to comply with NPDES requirements and reduce impacts from stormwater runoff. As outlined in the WQMP (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021b), BMPs would include hydroseeding and maintaining the existing on-site sediment desilting basins. Therefore, the Project would not provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Impacts would be less than significant. 10.c.iv. No Impact. According to Figure PS-2 of the City’s General Plan Public Safety Element (City of Temecula, 2005d), the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone. The 100-Year Flood Zones mapped in Figure PS- 2 correspond with the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Special Flood Hazard Areas. Therefore, development of the Project would not result in impacts related to impeding or redirecting flood flows. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. 10.d. No Impact. A seiche is an oscillation of a body of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin, such as a reservoir, harbor, lake, or storage tank. A tsunami is a great sea wave, commonly referred to as a tidal wave, produced by a significant undersea disturbance such as tectonic displacement of the sea floor associated with large, shallow earthquakes. Mudflows result from the downslope movement of soil and/or rock under the influence of gravity. According to Figure PS-2 of the City’s General Plan Public Safety Element (City of Temecula, 2005d), the Project Site is not located within a 100 Year Flood Zone or a dam inundation area and is not in proximity to a large-bodied lake. Therefore, the Project Site would not be subject to flood or seiche hazards. In addition, the Project Site is approximately 25 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean and would not be subject to tsunami hazards. Furthermore, the gently sloping topography of the project area is not conducive to sustaining mudflows. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. 10.e. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project Site is under the jurisdiction of the SDRWQCB. The Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin (Basin Plan) designates beneficial uses for water bodies in the San Diego Region and establishes water quality objectives and implementation plans to protect those beneficial uses (SDRWQCB, 1994). As discussed in Response 10.a. and 10.c., the Project would be required to comply with all applicable requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit issued by the SDRWQCB. In addition, the Project would be required to implement a SWPPP during construction that includes BMPs to reduce pollutants in stormwater runoff from the Project Site. Furthermore, the Project design would include LID BMPs to reduce erosion and treat stormwater runoff during operation. Therefore, the Project would not violate water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. Impacts would be less than significant. References: California Department of Water Resources. (2004, February 27). Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin. Retrieved from California's Groundwater Bulletin 118: https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Bulletin-118/Files/2003-Basin-Descriptions/9_005_TemeculaValley.pdf. California Department of Water Resources. (2020, January). California's Critically Overdrafted Groundwater Basins. Retrieved from California Department of Water Resources: https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web-Pages/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Basin-Prioritization/Files/CODBasins_websitemapPAO_a_20y.pdf. City of Temecula. (2005d). Public Safety Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/288/Public-Safety-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2018, July). Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5698/Temecula--BMP-Design-Manual. City of Temecula. (2018, January 4). Temecula Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program, Santa Margarita Region. Retrieved from https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/903/City-of-Temecula-Jurisdictional-Runoff-Management-Plan-2018JRMPPDF?bidId=. 55 City of Temecula. (2020, December). City of Temecula Engineering & Construction Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3083/Engineering-and-Construction-Manual. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021a). Hydrology Study for Rendezvous Phase II Apartments. Anaheim, CA. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021b). City of Temecula Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Temecula Village - Parcel 8 (Phase 2). Anaheim Hills. RCWD. (2015, December). Water Facilities Master Plan. Retrieved from Rancho California Water District: https://www.ranchowater.com/DocumentCenter/View/1802/2015-Water-Facilities-Master-Plan. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District. (2011). Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Riverside. SDRWQCB. (1994, September 8). Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin. Retrieved from California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/docs/R9_Basin_Plan.pdf. 56 11. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Physically divide an established community? X b Cause a significant environmental impact due to a conflict with any land use plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X Comments: 11.a. No Impact. The Project Site consists of vacant land within a developed, urban area in the City of Temecula. All Project improvements would be contained within the existing privately-owned parcel. The Project would be consistent with surrounding residential land uses and would not include physical features that would restrict access to the communities surrounding the project area. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. 11.b. Less Than Significant Impact. The existing General Plan designation for the Project Site is predominantly Professional Office (PO), with a small portion of the Project Site designated as Medium Residential (M) (7-12.9 dwelling units/acre) (Figure 4). The existing zoning for the Project Site is Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5) (Figure 5). The Project would require a General Plan amendment to Medium Density Residential (M) in existing areas designated as Professional Office (PO). In addition, the Project would require a Planning Development Overlay Amendment, which allows for multi-family residential uses in Phase II. The Project would include amenities (e.g., central pool, landscaped open space and recreational areas, and exercise room) for residents and traffic circulation improvements along Rancho California Road to support the increase in population density compared with the existing land use. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan (City of Temecula, 2018) and is not anticipated to conflict with land use plans, policies, or regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 57 12. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? X b Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? X Comments: 12.a-b. No Impact. The Project Site is within an urban area that is almost entirely developed. According to the City’s General Plan Open/Space Conservation Element, the Project Site is within mineral zone classification Mineral Resource Zone 3a (MRZ-3a) (City of Temecula, 2005b). As designated by the State Geologist, the MRZ-3 areas contain sedimentary deposits that have the potential to supply sand and gravel for concrete and crushed stone for aggregate. However, the Project Site is not currently used for mineral resource extraction and is not known to contain mineral deposits of significant economic value or any locally important mineral resources. Therefore, implementation of the Project would result in no impact regarding mineral resources. References: City of Temecula. (2005b). Open Space/Conservation Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId=. 58 13. NOISE. Would the project result in: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X 13.a. Less than Significant Impact. Noise is defined as unwanted sound; however, not all unwanted sound rises to the level of a potentially significant noise impact. To differentiate unwanted sound from potentially significant noise impacts, the City has established noise regulations that account for noise-sensitive land uses. The following discussion includes a brief description of the fundamental principles of noise and commonly used noise descriptors, a summary of applicable noise standards, and an evaluation of project-generated construction and operational noise. NOISE PRINCIPLES AND DESCRIPTORS Audible sound is a physical disturbance in a medium, such as air, that is capable of being detected by the human ear. Sound waves in air are caused by variations in pressure above and below the static value of atmospheric pressure. Sound is measured in units of decibels on a logarithmic scale. The “pitch” (high or low) of the sound is a description of frequency, which is measured in hertz. Most common environmental sounds are composed of a composite of frequencies. The time-varying characteristic of environmental noise over specified periods of time is described using statistical noise descriptors in terms of a single numerical value, expressed as A-weighted decibels (dbA). The noise descriptors used in this analysis are summarized below:  Leq: The Leq, or equivalent sound level, is used to describe the noise level over a specified period of time, typically 1-hour, expressed as Leq. The Leq may also be referred to as the “average” sound level.  Lmax: The maximum, instantaneous noise level.  CNEL: Community Noise Equivalent Level is the average noise level over a 24-hour day that includes an addition of 5 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the evening hours of 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and an addition of 10 dBA to the measured hourly noise levels between the nighttime hours of 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to account for noise sensitivity during the evening and nighttime hours, respectively. CITY OF TEMECULA MUNICIPAL CODE TMC Title 8 Chapter 9.20, “Noise,” declares that the making, creating, or continuance of excessive noises are detrimental to the public health, comfort, convenience, safety, welfare, and prosperity of the residents of the City. TMC Section 9.20.040 establishes noise standards for each land use classification, which are summarized in Table 13- 1. One-hour average sound levels are not to exceed the applicable limit. The noise subject to these limits is defined as that part of the total noise at the specified location that is due solely to the action of said person. 59 Per TMC Section 9.20.060.D, construction activity is prohibited between 6:30 p.m. and 7:00 a.m., Monday through Friday, when the construction site is within one-quarter mile of an occupied residence. Construction activities on Saturday are limited between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 6:30 p.m. No construction activity shall be undertaken on Sunday and national recognized holidays unless exempted by TMC Section 9.20.070. Table 13-1 City of Temecula Land Use/Noise Standards Property Receiving Noise Maximum Noise Level (CNEL, dBA) Type of Land Use Land Use Designation Interior Exterior1 Residential Hillside, Rural, Very Low Density, Low Density, Low-Medium Density 45 65 Medium Density 45 65/702 High Density 45 702 Commercial and Office Neighborhood, Community, Highway Tourist, Service N/A 70 Professional Office 50 70 Light Industrial Industrial Park 55 75 Public/Institutional School 50 65 All Others 50 70 Open Space Vineyards/Agricultural N/A 70 Open Space N/A 70/653 Notes: CNEL = community noise equivalent level, dB = decibel, CNEL = community-noise equivalent level 1 Regarding aircraft-related noise, the maximum acceptable exposure for new residential development is 60 dBA CNEL. 2 Maximum exterior noise levels up to 70 dBA CNEL are allowed for Multiple-Family Housing. 3 Where quiet is a basis required for the land use. Source: City of Temecula 2005 CONSTRUCTION Project-generated construction noise levels were assessed qualitatively based on the anticipated construction work and equipment mix and would result in a minor increase in daily trips (ADT). The potential for construction activities to expose receptors to excessive levels of noise was assessed based on the types of construction activity that would occur and the proximity of construction activity to existing nearby receptors which are located within 40 feet from the project site. It is anticipated that construction would occur over a single phase for a duration of approximately 24-months. Construction hours are proposed to be from 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Friday. No demolition or pile-driving would occur. Noise from construction activities would be generated by the operation of vehicles and equipment involved during various stages of construction: site preparation, grading, building construction, architectural coating, and paving. The noise levels generated by construction equipment would vary depending on factors such as the type and number of equipment, the specific model (horsepower rating), the construction activities being performed, and the maintenance condition of the equipment. The grading phase is typically the loudest phase of construction because the equipment used during grading/site preparation generate the loudest noise levels. The modeling assumed that up to three pieces of equipment (i.e., dozer, grader, and backhoe) could operate simultaneously, generating noise levels of Lmax 88.6 dBA at 50 feet and will last for an approximate period of 4 months. The closest noise-sensitive receptors to the Project Site are approximately 40 feet from the construction site. Therefore, Project construction would be required to comply with TMC Section 9.20.060.D, which stipulates that 60 construction activity must be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Monday through Saturday. It is foreseeable that construction activities would temporarily introduce new levels of noise; however, the extent of construction equipment required to construct the proposed project would be minor due to the size of the Project. Moreover, the Project would be constructed over a relatively short period (20 to 24 months) and would generate low construction-related ADT. Because additional ADT associated with construction would be minor, would be temporary, would be limited in scale due to project size, and would occur during the daytime hours when people are less sensitive to noise, construction noise impacts would be less than significant. OPERATION Operations-related noise impacts due to project-generated increases in traffic were evaluated qualitatively based on the increased ADT identified in Section 17, Transportation. The existing noise environment in the Project vicinity is dominated by traffic noise from nearby roadways, as well as nearby commercial activities. Long-term operations of the Project would have a minimal effect on the noise environment within the proximity of the project area. Noise generated by the Project would result primarily from the increased traffic on local roads. Most of the long-term noise that would result due to the implementation of the Project would primarily be traffic- generated. The Project would contribute to an increase in local traffic volumes, resulting in higher traffic noise levels along local roadways. Using algorithms from the Federal Highway Administration’s Traffic Noise Model Technical Manual and the traffic volumes for the Project provided in the Focused Traffic Analysis for the Project (Urban Crossroads, 2020a) (refer to Appendix E), traffic noise levels were estimated for roadway segments connected to the project site under Existing and Existing Plus Project conditions. The segments analyzed and the associated results of the modeling are shown in Table 13-2. Table 13-2 City of Temecula Land Use/Noise Standards Roadway Segment/Segment Description CNEL at 50 feet from Roadway Centerline Change (dB) Existing Existing Plus Project Rancho California Rd. from Margarita Rd. to Portofino Apartments 71.3 71.3 0.0 Rancho California Rd. from Portofino Apartments to Moraga Rd. 71.6 71.6 0.1 Rancho California Rd. from Moraga Rd. to Ynez Rd. 69.0 69.1 0.1 Rancho California Rd. from Ynez Rd. to Jefferson Ave/Old Town Front St. 71.1 71.1 0.0 Portofino Apartments Road 51.0 51.0 0.0 Moraga Rd. from Rancho California Rd. to Margarita Road 64.2 64.2 0.0 Moraga Rd. from Rancho California Rd. to Rancho California Rd. 51.8 51.8 0.0 Ynez Rd. from Rancho California Rd. to Overland Dr 70.2 70.5 0.3 Ynez Rd. from Rancho California Rd. to Santiago Rd 70.3 70.0 -0.3 Notes: CNEL = Community Noise Equivalent Level All modeling assumes average pavement, level roadways (less than 1.5% grade), constant traffic flow, and does not account for shielding of any type or finite roadway adjustments. All noise levels are reported as A-weighted noise levels. For additional details, refer to Appendix B for detailed traffic data, and traffic-noise modeling input data and output results. Source: Data modeled by Ascent Environmental in 2021 Although Project operation would increase ADT volumes in the vicinity of the Project Site by 792 ADT, Table 13-2 shows that the modeled road segments would have no increase or negligible increases (i.e., 0.1 dB) in noise levels under the Existing Plus Project scenario. According to the Caltrans Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol, a 3 dBA difference is generally the point at which the human ear will perceive a difference in noise level (Caltrans, 2020a). As such, new traffic noise would not be substantial such that it would be detectable by the human ear. As a result, project-related traffic noise impacts would be less than significant. 61 13.b. Less than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not result in any major operational sources of vibration (e.g., rail lines, transit stations), and therefore, this discussion focusses on short-term construction-generated vibration. Prior to the analysis, a brief discussion of vibration principles is included. FOUNDATIONS OF VIBRATION Vibration can be interpreted as energy transmitted in waves through the ground or man-made structures, which generally dissipate with distance from the vibration source. Because energy is lost during the transfer of energy from one particle to another, vibration becomes less perceptible with increasing distance from the source. Vibration sources include the use of heavy-duty equipment during construction, such as pile drivers, bulldozers, dump trucks, backhoes, rollers, and blasting activities. Operational sources include major transit (e.g., rail, transit stations) development. Maintenance operations and traffic traveling on roadways can also be a source of such vibration. If its amplitudes are high enough, ground vibration has the potential to damage structures, cause cosmetic damage or disrupt the operation of vibration-sensitive equipment such as electron microscopes and advanced technology production and research equipment. Ground vibration and ground-borne noise can also be a source of annoyance to individuals who live or work close to vibration-generating activities. In describing vibration in the ground and in structures, the motion of a particle (i.e., a point in or on the ground or structure) is used. The concepts of particle displacement, velocity, and acceleration are used to describe how the ground or structure responds to excitation. Although displacement is generally easier to understand than velocity or acceleration, it is rarely used to describe ground and structure borne vibration because most transducers used to measure vibration directly measure velocity or acceleration, not displacement. Accordingly, vibratory motion is commonly described by identifying the peak particle velocity (PPV). Construction-related vibrations are generally considered continuous vibration sources, except for pile driving, blasting, and other types of demolition, which are considered transient (single-event) sources. Construction equipment that would be utilized during site preparation and grading activities may include tractors, backhoes, haul trucks, graders, pavers, and water trucks. Based on the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, vibration levels for this type of equipment range from 0.003 in/sec PPV at 25 feet for tractors to 0.076 in/sec PPV at 25 feet for loaded trucks (FTA, 2018; Caltrans, 2020b: Table 18). Project construction would not require activities with potential to generate high levels of vibration, including demolition of structures or pile-driving. When considering potential impacts from construction-related vibration, both structural damage and human disturbance within occupied nearby structures are considered. In accordance with Caltrans guidance, a vibration level of 0.20 inches per second (in/sec) PPV is the threshold at which there is a risk of "architectural" damage to normal dwelling houses (i.e., houses with plastered walls and ceilings) (Caltrans, 2020b: Table 12). A residential structure could experience architectural and possible minor structural damage if exposed to continuous vibration levels that exceed 0.40 in/sec PPV. In addition, amplitudes of 0.10 in/sec PPV are the threshold at which continuous vibrations begin to annoy people and amplitudes of 0.20 in/sec are the threshold at which vibrations are annoying to people in buildings. Because vibration levels would dissipate with distance from the source and the nearest residential structure is approximately 40 feet east of the project site, continuous vibration from construction equipment is not anticipated to exceed 0.1 in/sec PPV at existing nearby residential structures. Therefore, project construction is not anticipated to result in architectural or structural damage to nearby residential structures and is not anticipated to result in annoyance to humans occupying nearby residences. Furthermore, construction activities would take place during the daytime hours when people are generally not sleeping and would therefore not be disrupted. Thus, impacts associated with construction-related ground vibration and vibration noise would be less than significant. 13.c. No Impact. According to Figure LU-2 of the City General Plan Land Use Element (City of Temecula, 2005e), the Project Site is not within an airport land use plan or within two miles of a public airport. The closest airport is the French Valley Airport, located at 37600 Sky Canyon Drive in the City of Murrieta, approximately 4.0 miles northeast of the Project Site. Therefore, there would be no impact. 62 References: Caltrans. (2020a, April). Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol for New Highway Construction, Reconstruction, and Retrofit Barrier Projects. Retrieved from California Department of Transportation: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot- media/programs/environmental-analysis/documents/env/traffic-noise-protocol-april-2020-a11y.pdf. Caltrans. (2020b, April). Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Retrieved from California Department of Transportation: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental- analysis/documents/env/tcvgm-apr2020-a11y.pdf. City of Temecula. (2005e). Land Use Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/284/Land-Use-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005f). Noise Element. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/286/Noise-PDF?bidId=. Federal Highway Administration. 2004. Traffic Noise Model Version 2.5. Available: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/noise/traffic_noise_model/tnm_v25/. Accessed August 17, 2017. FTA. (2018, September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Retrieved from Federal Transit Administration: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit- noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf. 63 14. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Induce substantial unplanned population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X b Displace substantial numbers of existing people or housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X Comments: 14.a. Less than Significant Impact. As of July 1, 2019, the total population in the City of Temecula was approximately 114,761 people (U.S. Census Bureau, 2019). Implementation of the Project would result in development of 134 apartment units that would house approximately 427 residents. The Project would increase the total population in the City by approximately 0.37 percent. The Project Site is in an area planned for development. The Project would require a General Plan Amendment and Planned Development Overlay Amendment for the proposed residential land use within Phase II. The Project would include amenities (e.g., central pool, landscaped open space and recreational areas, and exercise room) for residents and traffic circulation improvements along Rancho California Road to support the increase in population density compared with the existing land use. Therefore, the Project would be consistent with the City’s Growth Management Plan (City of Temecula, 2018b) and is not anticipated to directly induce substantial unplanned population growth. In addition, the Project would be considered infill development in an urban area served by existing roads and infrastructure. The Project would not require an expansion of capacity of existing roads or infrastructure and would not introduce new roads or infrastructure to an undeveloped area. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to induce indirect population growth. Therefore, the Project’s impacts would be less than significant. 14.b. No Impact. The Project Site is currently vacant and undeveloped with no housing units. Project implementation would not result in the displacement of people or housing. Therefore, the Project would have no impact. References: City of Temecula. (2018b, May 23). Growth Management Plan. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5384/Growth-Management-Handout. U.S. Census Bureau. (2019, July 1). Temecula city, California. Retrieved from QuickFacts: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/temeculacitycalifornia. 64 15. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered government facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the following public services: a Fire protection? X b Police protection? X c Schools? X d Parks? X e Other public facilities? X Comments: 15.a. Less than Significant Impact. Fire protection and emergency medical services are provided to the City and the Project Site by the Temecula Fire Department (FD), which contracts with the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD). Construction and operation of the Project would introduce temporary construction workers and approximately 427 residents on the Project Site. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth, nor would it result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula FD services and facilities which would require new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Additionally, the Project would be required to pay the Fire Development Impact Fee at the time of the completion of the first building permit. Therefore, impacts on fire protection would be less than significant. 15.b. Less than Significant Impact. Police services for the City and the Project Site are provided by the City of Temecula Police Department (PD), which contracts with the Riverside County Sheriff Department (RCSD). Construction and operation of the Project would introduce temporary construction workers and approximately 427 residents on the Project Site. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth and result in substantial adverse effects on Temecula PD services and facilities which could result in the need for new or physically altered facilities to maintain service. Therefore, impacts on police protection would be less than significant. 15.c. Less than Significant Impact. The Project Site is under the jurisdiction of the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD). Pursuant to California Education Code Section 17620, all new residential construction within the TVUSD is subject to the collection of Level 1 Developer Fees. Implementation of the Project would result in the development of 134 apartment units for approximately 427 residents. As indicated in a comment letter from TVUSD dated June 25, 2021, the proposed apartment units are expected to generate approximately 75 K-12 students for the TVUSD, not including any students in the transitional kindergarten year (refer to Appendix F). As a condition of Project approval, the applicant would be required to pay developer fees to accommodate increases in demand for schools from proposed development. For new single and multi-family residential units, the developer fee is $4.08 for each square foot of accessible space. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth beyond what was projected in the City’s General Plan. In addition, pursuant to Government Code section 65995, payment of fees would result in the avoidance of impacts to schools. Therefore, impacts on schools would be less than significant. 15.d. Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project would result in the development of 134 apartment units for approximately 427 residents. According to the City’s General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element, the basic park acreage standard for the City of Temecula is 5.0 acres of usable City-owned parkland per 1,000 residents (City of Temecula, 2005b). Based on this standard, the Project would be required to provide 2.14 acres of parks or pay an in-lieu fee. As discussed in Public Services Response 15.d., the Project would include on-site amenities, including 2.6 acres of landscaped 65 open space and recreational areas, a central pool, and an exercise room to serve the residents. These recreational facilities would adequately meet the City’s park acreage requirements. Therefore, impacts on parks would be less than significant. 15.e. Less than Significant Impact. The nearest public facility is the Ronald H. Roberts Temecula Public Library, located approximately 1.0 mile southeast of the Project Site at 30600 Pauba Road. Construction and operation of the Project would introduce temporary construction workers and approximately 427 residents on the Project Site. The Project is not expected to induce substantial population growth beyond what was projected in the City’s General Plan. Therefore, impacts on public facilities would be less than significant. References: City of Temecula. (2005b). Open Space/Conservation Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId=. 66 16. RECREATION. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X Comments: 16.a. Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project would result in the development of 134 apartment units for approximately 427 residents. According to the City’s General Plan Open Space/Conservation Element, the basic park acreage standard for the City of Temecula is 5.0 acres of usable City-owned parkland per 1,000 residents (City of Temecula, 2005b). Based on this standard, the Project would be required to provide 2.14 acres of parks or pay an in-lieu fee. As discussed in Public Services Response 15.d., the Project would include on-site amenities, including 2.6 acres of landscaped open space and recreational areas, a central pool, and an exercise room to serve the residents. These recreational facilities would adequately meet the City’s park acreage requirements. Therefore, the Project is not anticipated to substantially increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities; impacts would be less than significant. 16.b. Less than Significant Impact. Implementation of the Project would result in the development of 134 apartment units for approximately 427 residents. As discussed under Response 16.a. the Project would contain recreational facilities to serve residents on-site. Therefore, Project operation would not lead to the need for new or expanded recreational facilities. Therefore, the Project’s impacts would be less than significant. References: City of Temecula. (2005b). Open Space/Conservation Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId=. 67 17. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system, including transit, roadway, bicycle and pedestrian facilities? X b Would the project conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b)? X c Substantially increase hazards due to a geometric design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X d Result in inadequate emergency access? X Comments: 17.a. Less Than Significant Impact. Roadways A Focused Traffic Analysis (Urban Crossroads, 2020a) was prepared to evaluate potential circulation system deficiencies that may result from the development of the Project and is included as Appendix E of this Final IS/ND. The Focused Traffic Analysis evaluated traffic impacts at three major intersections in proximity to the Project Site, including Ynez Road/Rancho California Road, Moraga Road/Rancho California Road, and proposed Driveway 1/Rancho California Road. As discussed in the TIA, the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) adopted the 2011 Congestion Management Program (CMP) for the County of Riverside in December 2011. None of the study area intersections in the Focused Traffic Analysis are identified as CMP facilities in the RCTC CMP. Therefore, the Project would not conflict with the RCTC CMP. Based on the Focused Traffic Analysis, the Project is anticipated to generate 792 daily trips on a typical weekday with approximately 52 AM peak hour trips and 64 PM peak hour trips. The Focused Traffic Analysis assumed a total of 142 apartment units and an estimated 452 residents, which is greater than the 134 apartment units and 427 residents proposed at the time of this Final IS/ND. Therefore, the number of daily trips generated from the Project has been conservatively estimated. No traffic impacts were identified at the Ynez Road/Rancho California Road and Moraga Road/Rancho California Road intersections; therefore, no improvements are proposed at these intersections. As part of the Phase I development, a traffic signal and a northbound left turn lane and shared through-right turn lane were constructed at the full access driveway off Rancho California Road to accommodate access to the Project Site. Because the Project would generate new vehicle trips, the applicant would also be required to pay a TUMF to the WRCOG. Payment of the TUMF would ensure that funding is in place for construction of facilities needed to maintain the requisite level of service and critical to mobility in the region. Construction activities have the potential to result in short-term, temporary impacts to surrounding roadways for a period of 20 to 24 months. The Project may require partial lane closures or result in temporary traffic slowdown from the presence of construction vehicles. Project construction would generate a negligible number of trips on the surrounding roadways from haul trips and worker commutes. Existing vehicle access along Rancho California Road would be maintained for the duration of construction activities. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities There are currently Class 2 bike lanes along Moraga Road and the Project’s frontage on Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. There are planned Class 2 bike lanes along Ynez Road and Rancho California Road, from Ynez Road 68 to east of Moraga Road. There are also planned multi-use trails along Moraga Road and Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. There are existing sidewalks lining Rancho California Road in proximity to the Project Site; however, there is no existing sidewalk along the Project’s frontage on Rancho California Road. The Project would include implementation of sidewalk and curb and gutter improvements to accommodate the proposed full access and emergency access driveways along Rancho California Road. Existing bicycle and pedestrian access along Rancho California Road would be maintained for the duration of construction activities. Transit Service The RTA currently provides transit services within the City of Temecula. RTA Route 24 operates on Rancho California Road and would likely serve the Project Site. Route 24 provides transit service to several major attractions within the City of Temecula. RTA Route 202 also runs along Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Project construction and operation are not anticipated to require relocation of any existing transit stops or rerouting of any existing transit routes. Based on the above discussion, the Project would not conflict with a program plan, ordinance or policy addressing the circulation system; impacts would be less than significant. 17.b. Less Than Significant Impact. CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3 describes specific considerations for evaluating a project’s transportation impacts. Generally, vehicle miles traveled (VMT) is identified as the most appropriate measure of transportation impacts. VMT refers to the amount and distance of automobile travel attributable to a project. The Office of Planning and Research (OPR) published an updated Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (OPR Technical Advisory) in December 2018, which provides guidance on evaluating transportation impacts based on VMT. The City released Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines in September 2020 (City of Temecula, 2020b) and adopted project level screening thresholds consistent with those recommended in the OPR Technical Advisory. Consistent with City Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Guidelines, projects should evaluate available screening criteria based on their location and project type to determine if a presumption of a less than significant transportation impact can be made. As discussed in the Project’s VMT Screening Analysis (Urban Crossroads, 2020b), which is included as Appendix E of this Final IS/ND, the following project screening thresholds were reviewed based on their applicability to the Project:  Small Residential and Employment Projects Screening  Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/High Quality Transit Corridor Screening  Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area Screening A land use project need only meet one of the above screening criteria to result in a less than significant impact. The OPR Technical Advisory notes that “residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT.” The City TIA Guidelines also note that the use of map-based screening for VMT efficient areas is applicable for uses such as the Project’s residential development. As discussed in the VMT Screening Analysis, the City TIA Guidelines includes a map that identifies VMT efficient areas. The map utilizes the sub-regional Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) to measure current VMT performance and compares them to the applicable impact threshold. The Project is located within an area that is 15 percent below the WRCOG Regional Average. Therefore, the Project meets the VMT Efficient Area screening threshold and would be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. The Project was not found to meet the Small Residential and Employment Projects or Major Transit Stop High Quality Transit Corridor screening; however, meeting the VMT Efficient Area screening is sufficient for a less than significant impact determination; no additional VMT analysis is required. Based on the above discussion, the Project would not conflict or be inconsistent with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b). Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 69 17.c. Less Than Significant Impact. Once operational, pedestrian and vehicle access to the Project Site would be provided via a driveway off Rancho California Road, with a separate driveway for emergency access only. Sight distance at the proposed access driveways would be reviewed with respect to standard Caltrans and City sight distance standards. As part of the Phase I development, a traffic signal and a northbound left turn lane and shared through-right turn lane were constructed at the full access driveway off Rancho California Road to accommodate access to the Project Site. The Project would not be designed to have any features, such as sharp curves or dangerous intersections, that would pose a safety hazard. No farms, industrial activities, or other land uses incompatible with the proposed residential development are in the project vicinity. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 17.d. Less Than Significant Impact. Once operational, pedestrian and vehicle access to the Project Site would be provided via a driveway off Rancho California Road, with a separate driveway for emergency access only. The final site plan would be subject to approval by the City Public Works Department and Temecula Fire Department to ensure that adequate emergency access is provided. All construction activities would be subject to emergency access standards and requirements of the Temecula Fire Department to ensure traffic safety. Therefore, the Project is not expected to result in inadequate emergency access. Impacts would be less than significant. References: City of Temecula. (2005e). Land Use Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/284/Land-Use-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005f). Noise Element. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/286/Noise-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2020b, September). Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/210/Traffic-Impact-Analysis-Guidelines-PDF?bidId=. Urban Crossroads. (2020a). Temecula Village Apartments (Phase II) Focused Traffic Impact Analysis. Temecula. Urban Crossroads. (2020b). Temecula Village Apartment Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Assessment. San Bernardino. 70 18. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource, defined in Public Resources Code section 21074 as either a site, feature, place, cultural landscape that is geographically defined in terms of the size and scope of the landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value to a California Native American tribe, and that is: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources, or in a local register of historical resources as defined in Public Resources Code section 5020.1(k), or X b A resource determined by the lead agency, in its discretion and supported by substantial evidence, to be significant pursuant to criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1. In applying the criteria set forth in subdivision (c) of Public Resources Code Section 5024.1, the lead agency shall consider the significance of the resource to a California Native American tribe. X Comments: 18.a-b. No Impact. As discussed in Section 5, Cultural Resources, the Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded. Based on the subsurface investigation completed for the Geotechnical Evaluation (EEI Engineering Solutions, 2019), engineered artificial fill was encountered at the surface and extended to relatively shallow depths (approximately 5 feet bgs). Because excavation would be limited to approximately 3 feet bgs and entirely within artificial fill, impacts on tribal cultural resources are not anticipated during Project construction. Project operation would not involve ground-disturbing activities that would adversely affect a tribal cultural resource. In accordance with AB 52 and Public Resources Code Section 21080.3.1, the City sent formal notification letters of the Project, dated November 13, 2020, to the Native American tribes recommended by the NAHC. These tribes include the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Indians (Pechanga Tribe), Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians, Rincon Band of Luiseño Indians (Rincon Tribe), Soboba Band of Luiseno Indians, and Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians. The City received responses from the Rincon and Pechanga Tribes on November 30, 2020 and December 15, 2020, respectively, with both tribes requesting consultation. Consultation with these tribes concluded on May 20, 2021. The Rincon and Pechanga Tribes did not identify tribal cultural resources within the Project Site or request mitigation measures during the consultation process. Based on the above discussion, the Project would not cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource; therefore, there would be no impact 71 19. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment or storm water drainage, electric power, natural gas, or telecommunications facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects? X b Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project and responsibly foreseeable future development during normal, dry and multiple dry years? X c Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X d Generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals? X e Comply with federal, state, and local management and reduction statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X Comments: 19.a. Less Than Significant Impact. The Project would result in development of 134 apartment units on a vacant site that would house approximately 427 residents. The Project is anticipated to increase demand for utilities beyond existing conditions, as discussed below. Water RCWD would provide water services (i.e., potable water) to the Project Site. Recycled water is not currently available to the Project Site. The RCWD Water Facilities Master Plan includes water capacity and demand projections for anticipated build-out within RCWD boundaries. According to the Water Facilities Master Plan, the projected build-out annual capacity of 115,002 AFY is greater than the projected build-out annual production requirement of 110,714 AFY (RCWD, 2015). The Project is within RCWD’s full build-out area; therefore, the Project would be adequately served by the projected water supply for the RCWD. In a letter dated December 22, 2020, RCWD indicated that there is existing water service to the Project Site (see Appendix D). The Project would provide connections to the existing 12-inch water servicing line within Rancho California Road and would comply with all RCWD rules and regulations governing water system facilities and service. The Project proponent would be required to contact RCWD for a determination of existing water system capability, based upon project-specific demands and fire flow requirements, as well as a determination of proposed water facilities configuration. The Project’s water system would be designed consistent with the requirements of RCWD and the City’s Public Works Department. In addition, the Project applicant would be required to pay a water service charge to RCWD to maintain and upgrade its system. RCWD has sufficient capacity to accommodate the water needs of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not require the construction of new or expanded water facilities. Wastewater Wastewater facilities for the Project Site and the City are provided by EMWD. According to the EMWD Sewer Master Plan, EMWD is permitted to discharge 3.6 million gallons per day to its non-reclaimable waste line (EMWD, 2019). Wastewater produced by Project would be treated by the Temecula Valley Regional Water Reclamation Facility, located at 42565 Avenida Alvarado, Temecula. 72 The Project would provide connections to the existing wastewater mainlines. The Project applicant would be required to pay sewer connection fees to EMWD when acquiring new sewer services. In a letter dated December 21, 2020, EMWD has indicated that it is willing to provide sewer services to the Project, contingent upon the Project’s compliance with EMWD’s rules and regulations (see Appendix D). EWMD has sufficient capacity to accommodate the wastewater treatment needs of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not require the construction of new or expanded wastewater facilities. Stormwater According to the Project’s Hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a), the majority of the Project Site currently drains to the north side of the property and ultimately discharges to the existing 30-inch public storm drain along Rancho California Road. The Project Site currently experiences off-site run on from the east and south property lines. As discussed in Section 10, Hydrology and Water Quality, the Project would result in a net increase of 4.76 acres impervious surfaces within the Project Site (i.e., buildings, roadways, and parking lots). The Project would be designed in accordance with the City’s BMP Design Manual, as demonstrated in the Project’s WQMP. the Project includes source control BMPs to prevent illicit discharges into the MS4. These BMPs include reducing exposure of refuse areas, implementing sweeping and washing requirements for paved areas, stenciling or installing signage at storm drain inlets and catch basins, and screening trash enclosures. The Project also includes site design BMPs, such as maintaining existing drainage pathways and hydrologic features; minimizing impervious surface areas; and landscaping with a native and drought tolerant species to minimize the use of irrigation, fertilizers, and pesticides. Runoff from the Project Site would be conveyed through underground storm drain pipes and treated through an infiltration/detention pipe system before infiltrating into the soil. Excess runoff would be discharged to the existing storm drain pipe system under Rancho California Road. As demonstrated in the Project’s Hydrology Study (DRC Engineering, Inc., 2021a), stormwater discharge from the Project Site in the developed condition would be at or below the pre-developed condition for the modeled 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year storm events. Therefore, the existing 30-inch storm drain along Rancho California Road would have adequate capacity and the Project would not require the construction of new or expanded stormwater facilities. Electricity and Natural Gas SCE would provide electricity services and SoCalGas would provide natural gas services to the Project Site. As discussed in Section 6, Energy, Project operation would result in the consumption of 654.1 MWh/year of electricity and 1694.8 MMBTU/year of natural gas. As discussed under Response 6.a., the Project would be designed in compliance with CalGreen requirements. Project sustainability features would include the following:  Energy efficient building materials, appliances, lighting and mechanical systems, and water efficient plumbing systems  Solar panels on the roofs of the apartment buildings  Electric conduit for future electric vehicle charging stations (EVCS)  Bicycle parking  Real-time energy monitors to track energy use  New sidewalks and paving with high solar reflectivity materials  City-issued water meters that track real time water use with data logging equipment if necessary  Low water irrigation systems and landscaping SCE and SoCalGas would have adequate capacity to serve the energy needs of the Project. Therefore, the Project would not require the construction of new electric power or natural gas facilities. 73 Telecommunications A variety of companies would provide telecommunications services to the Project Site, including Spectrum and Frontier Communications. Telecommunications providers would have adequate capacity to serve Project demand. Therefore, the Project would not require the construction of new telecommunications facilities. Although the Project is anticipated to increase demand for utilities beyond existing conditions, the Project would not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded facilities. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 19.b. Less Than Significant Impact. See Response 19.a. As discussed above, RCWD has sufficient supplies to serve the Project. The water supply projections in the RCWD Water Facilities Master Plan account for normal, dry, and multiple dry years (RCWD, 2015). Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 19.c. Less Than Significant Impact. See Response 19.a. As discussed above, EMWD has sufficient capacity to accommodate the wastewater treatment needs of the Project. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 19.d. and e. Less Than Significant Impact. The Riverside County Department of Waste Resources operates six landfills that serve the residents of Riverside County. The nearest solid waste landfills are Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill, approximately 27 miles northeast of the Project Site at 16411 Lamb Canyon Road in Beaumont, California, and Badlands Sanitary Landfill, approximately 31 miles northeast of the Project Site at 31125 Ironwood Avenue in Moreno Valley, California. As of January 2015, the Lamb Canyon Sanitary Landfill had a remaining capacity of 19,242,950 cubic yards and the Badlands Sanitary Landfill had a remaining capacity of 15,748,799 cubic yards (CalRecycle, 2021). The City of Temecula has a contract with CR&R Inc. for trash and recycling services. CR&R Inc. has five material recovery, transfer, and disposal facilities in California. The nearest facility is the Perris Transfer Station and Materials Recovery Facility, located in Perris, California, which has a maximum permitted capacity of 3,287 tons per day (CalRecycle, 2021). The Project Site is currently vacant and has been previously rough graded. Project construction would not require the demolition of structures and is not anticipated to generate substantial amounts of solid waste or hazardous materials. Construction activities would generate small amounts of debris and other construction waste. In addition, Project construction would require the export of approximately 23,716 cubic yards of soil and artificial fill material. The solid waste generated from Project construction would be temporary and relatively minor. Construction activities would comply with CalGreen, which includes mandatory construction and demolition recycling. In addition, as discussed in Section 9, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, any hazardous wastes generated from construction activities would be disposed of in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and manufacturers’ instructions. Applicable regulations include the Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), which includes requirements for hazardous solid waste management; the Department of Toxic Substances Control Environmental Health Standards for the Management of Hazardous Waste (CCR Title 22, Division 4.5), which include standards for generators and transporters of hazardous waste; and the provisions of the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, which oversees hazardous waste generation in Riverside County. Project operation would generate a relatively small amount of solid waste typically associated with residential land uses. CalRecycle’s solid waste generation rates for a multi-family residence range from approximately 4 to 8.6 pounds per dwelling unit per day (CalRecycle, 2019). Based on these rates, the Project’s 134 dwelling units are anticipated to generate between 536 to 1,152 pounds per day of solid waste. Given the permitted capacity of nearby disposal facilities and the relatively small amount of solid waste that would be generated by Project construction and operation, the Project is not expected to generate solid waste in excess of State or local standards, or in excess of the capacity of local infrastructure, or otherwise impair the attainment of solid waste reduction goals. In addition, the disposal of solid waste would comply with all federal, state, and local statutes and regulations. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 74 References: CalRecycle. (2019). Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Retrieved from California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. CalRecycle. (2021, February 10). Solid Waste Information System (SWIS). Retrieved from https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021a). Hydrology Study for Rendezvous Phase II Apartments. Anaheim. EMWD. (2019). Sewer System Management Plan. Retrieved from Eastern Municipal Water District: https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2016ssmpfullreport.pdf. RCWD. (2015, December). Water Facilities Master Plan. Retrieved from Rancho California Water District: https://www.ranchowater.com/DocumentCenter/View/1802/2015-Water-Facilities-Master-Plan. 75 20. WILDFIRE. If located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high fire hazard severity zones, would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Substantially impair an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X b Due to slope, prevailing winds, and other factors, exacerbate wildfire risks, and thereby expose project occupants to, pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire? X c Require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure (such as roads, fuel breaks, emergency water sources, power lines or other utilities) that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment? X d Expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post-fire slope instability, or drainage changes? X Comments: 19.a-d. No Impact. As discussed in Response 9.g., the Project Site is in a developed urban area; it has been previously rough graded and does not contain large vegetation. The Project Site is not classified as a VHFHSZ (Cal Fire, 2009) and is not located near or within a Cal Fire designated SRA (Cal Fire, 2007). The closest very VHFHSZ is located approximately 1.4 miles southwest of the Project Site and the closest SRA is located approximately 2.3 miles east of the Project Site. Therefore, the Project would have no impact related to wildfire. References: Cal Fire. (2007, November 7). Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area - Western Riverside County. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs_map60.pdf. Cal Fire. (2009, December 21). Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area (LRA) as Recommended by Cal Fire - Temecula. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5924/temecula.pdf. 76 21. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. Would the project: Issues and Supporting Information Sources Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact a Does the project have the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? X c Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X Comments: 21.a. No Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained in this Final IS/ND, the Project is not anticipated to substantially degrade the quality of the environment. As discussed in Section 4, Biological Resources, the Project Site does not have suitable habitat for special-status plant or animal species. Therefore, the project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self- sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or substantially reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. In addition, as discussed in Section 5, Cultural Resources, no historical or archaeological resources were identified on the Project Site. Therefore, the project would not eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory. As such, no impact would occur. 21.b-c. Less Than Significant Impact. Based on evaluations and discussions contained Sections 1 through 20 of this Final IS/ND, Project development is not anticipated to have incremental effects that would be cumulatively considerable effects in context of the effects of past, current, and probable future projects, nor is it expected to cause substantial adverse effects on human beings directly or indirectly. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. 77 SOURCES Cal Fire. (2007, November 7). Fire Hazard Severity Zones in State Responsibility Area - Western Riverside County. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/6752/fhszs_map60.pdf. Cal Fire. (2009, December 21). Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in Local Responsibility Area (LRA) as Recommended by Cal Fire - Temecula. Retrieved from California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: https://osfm.fire.ca.gov/media/5924/temecula.pdf. CalGEM. (2019). Well Finder. Retrieved from CalGEM GIS: https://www.conservation.ca.gov/calgem/Pages/WellFinder.aspx. California Department of Water Resources. (2004, February 27). Temecula Valley Groundwater Basin. Retrieved from California's Groundwater Bulletin 118: https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web- Pages/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Bulletin-118/Files/2003-Basin- Descriptions/9_005_TemeculaValley.pdf. California Department of Water Resources. (2020, January). California's Critically Overdrafted Groundwater Basins. Retrieved from California Department of Water Resources: https://water.ca.gov/-/media/DWR-Website/Web- Pages/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Basin- Prioritization/Files/CODBasins_websitemapPAO_a_20y.pdf. CalRecycle. (2019). Estimated Solid Waste Generation Rates. Retrieved from California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery: https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/WasteCharacterization/General/Rates. CalRecycle. (2021, February 10). Solid Waste Information System (SWIS). Retrieved from https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/SWFacilities/. Caltrans. (2019, August). List of eligible and officially designated State Scenic Highways. Retrieved from California State Scenic Highways: https://dot.ca.gov/programs/design/lap-landscape-architecture-and-community- livability/lap-liv-i-scenic-highways. Caltrans. (2020a, April). Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol for New Highway Construction, Reconstruction, and Retrofit Barrier Projects. Retrieved from California Department of Transportation: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental-analysis/documents/env/traffic-noise-protocol-april-2020-a11y.pdf. Caltrans. (2020b, April). Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual. Retrieved from California Department of Transportation: https://dot.ca.gov/-/media/dot-media/programs/environmental-analysis/documents/env/tcvgm-apr2020-a11y.pdf. CAPCOA. (2016). CalEEMod Version 2016.3.2. Retrieved from California Air Pollution Control Officers Association: http://www.capcoa.org/caleemod/. CARB. (2005, April). Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww3.arb.ca.gov/ch/handbook.pdf. CARB. (2015, March 17). User Manual for the Hotspots Analysis and Reporting Program Air Dispersion Modeling and Risk Assessment Tool Version 2. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//toxics/harp/docs2/harp2admrtuserguide.pdf. CARB. (2017, November). California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/sites/default/files/classic//cc/scopingplan/scoping_plan_2017.pdf. CARB. (2019). Maps of State and Federal Area Designations. Retrieved from California Air Resources Board: https://ww2.arb.ca.gov/resources/documents/maps-state-and-federal-area-designations. CDOC. (2016). California Important Farmland Finder. Retrieved from California Department of Conservation: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/DLRP/CIFF/. 78 CDOC. (2017). State of California Williamson Act Land. Retrieved from https://planning.lacity.org/eir/HollywoodCenter/Deir/ELDP/(E)%20Initial%20Study/Initial%20Study/Attachme nt%20B%20References/California%20Department%20of%20Conservation%20Williamson%20Map%202016.p df. CGS. (2019, April 4). Earthquake Zones of Required Investigation. Retrieved from California Geological Survey: https://maps.conservation.ca.gov/cgs/EQZApp/app/. City of Temecula. (2005a, August 9). City of Temecula City-Wide Design Guidelines. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/297/Temecula-City-Wide-Design-Guidelines-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005b). Open Space/Conservation Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/287/Open-Space-Conservation-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005c). Community Design Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/279/Community-Design-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005d). Public Safety Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/288/Public-Safety-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005e). Land Use Element. Retrieved from Temecula General Plan: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/284/Land-Use-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2005f). Noise Element. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/286/Noise-PDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2010, June 22). Sustainability Plan. Retrieved from City of Temecula: http://laserfiche.cityoftemecula.org/weblink/2/doc/241368/Electronic.aspx. City of Temecula. (2018a, July). Best Management Practice (BMP) Design Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5698/Temecula--BMP-Design-Manual. City of Temecula. (2018b, May 23). Growth Management Plan. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/5384/Growth-Management-Handout. City of Temecula. (2018c, January 4). Temecula Jurisdictional Runoff Management Program, Santa Margarita Region. Retrieved from https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/903/City-of-Temecula-Jurisdictional-Runoff- Management-Plan-2018JRMPPDF?bidId=. City of Temecula. (2020a, December). City of Temecula Engineering & Construction Manual. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/3083/Engineering-and-Construction-Manual. City of Temecula. (2020b, September). Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Retrieved from City of Temecula: https://temeculaca.gov/DocumentCenter/View/210/Traffic-Impact-Analysis-Guidelines-PDF?bidId=. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021a). Hydrology Study for Rendezvous Phase II Apartments. Anaheim. DRC Engineering, Inc. (2021b). City of Temecula Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for Temecula Village - Parcel 8 (Phase 2). Anaheim Hills. DTSC. (2021). EnviroStor. Retrieved from California Department of Toxic Substances Control: https://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. EEI Engineering Solutions. (2019). Geotechnical Evaluation. Carlsbad. EMWD. (2019). Sewer System Management Plan. Retrieved from Eastern Municipal Water District: https://www.emwd.org/sites/main/files/file-attachments/2016ssmpfullreport.pdf. FTA. (2018, September). Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. Retrieved from Federal Transit Administration: https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/research-innovation/118131/transit- noise-and-vibration-impact-assessment-manual-fta-report-no-0123_0.pdf. 79 OEHHA. (2015, February). Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines. Retrieved from Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment: https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/2015guidancemanual.pdf. Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (2017). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report. Canoga Park.. RCA. (2018, November 5). RCA MSHCP Information Map. Retrieved from Western Riverside County Regional Conservation Authority: https://wrcrca.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a73e69d2a64d41c29ebd3acd67467abd. RCWD. (2015, December). Water Facilities Master Plan. Retrieved from Rancho California Water District: https://www.ranchowater.com/DocumentCenter/View/1802/2015-Water-Facilities-Master-Plan. Riverside County Flood Control Water Conservation District. (2011, September). Design Handbook for Low Impact Development Best Management Practices. Retrieved from http://content.rcflood.org/downloads/NPDES/Documents/LIDManual/LID_BMP_Design_Handbook.pdf. SCAG. (2020, September 3). Connect SoCal: The 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of the Southern California Association of Governments. Retrieved from Southern California Association of Governments: https://scag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal- plan_0.pdf?1606001176. SCAQMD. (2008, October). Draft Guidance Document - Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default- source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/ghgattachmente.pdf. SCAQMD. (2009, November 19). Greenhouse Gas CEQA Significance Threshold Stakeholder Working Group #14. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008-2009/ghg-meeting-14/ghg-meeting-14-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. Accessed November 18, 2019. SCAQMD. (2017, March). Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/clean-air-plans/air-quality-management- plans/2016-air-quality-management-plan/final-2016-aqmp/final2016aqmp.pdf?sfvrsn=15. SCAQMD. (2019, April). South Coast AQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Retrieved from South Coast Air Quality Management District: http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance-thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2.%20Accessed%20November%2012,%202019. SDRWQCB. (1994, September 8). Water Quality Control Plan for the San Diego Basin. Retrieved from California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/sandiego/water_issues/programs/basin_plan/docs/R9_Basin_Plan.pdf. U.S. Census Bureau. (2019, July 1). Temecula city, California. Retrieved from QuickFacts: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/temeculacitycalifornia. Urban Crossroads. (2020a). Temecula Village Apartments (Phase II) Focused Traffic Impact Analysis. Temecula, CA. Urban Crossroads. (2020b). Temecula Village Apartment Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Assessment. San Bernardino, CA. 80 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix A – Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Modeling Data 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 280.00 Space 2.52 112,000.00 0 City Park 2.64 Acre 2.64 115,182.00 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 1.04 1000sqft 0.02 1,040.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 10.00 Dwelling Unit 0.63 10,000.00 29 Apartments Mid Rise 132.00 Dwelling Unit 3.47 132,000.00 378 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.4 28 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2024Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 136.33 0.1CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.001N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula Riverside-South Coast County, Annual CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 1 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Utility GHG emissions factor interpolated between 453.2 lbCO2/Mwh reported for 2019 and 0 lbCo2/MWh assumed for 2045, under SB100. Land Use - City Park includes Landscaping area (115,182 SF). The proposed number of apartment units were 134 but for a conservative approach and keeping consistency with the traffic study, 142 (mid and low size) units were assumed for the modeling. Construction Phase - Approx. construction scedule provied by the client. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Approx assumption of number graders required for preliminary grading cut of 27,322 CY. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Approx assumption of number graders required for preliminary grading cut of 27,322 CY. Trips and VMT - Grading - Site preparation would require preliminary grading cut of approximately 27,322 cubic yards, fill of 3,562 cubic yards, and export of 23,716 cubic yards. Vehicle Trips - The Project is not anticipated to employ any full-time equivalent staff. The trip rate is taken from the traffic study. Area Coating - Energy Use - Adjusted energy values for Title 24 2019 Energy Efficiency standards. Fleet Mix - Architectural Coating - Woodstoves - Water And Wastewater - Solid Waste - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 2 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 87.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 326.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 772.17 517.05 tblEnergyUse T24E 877.14 587.33 tblEnergyUse T24NG 8,764.08 5,868.43 tblEnergyUse T24NG 9,544.50 6,391.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 23,716.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 114,998.40 115,182.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.1 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 702.44 136.33 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.001 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 5.44 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 7.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 5.44 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 7.32 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 7.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 3 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 4 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 0.2495 2.5006 2.0350 6.2000e- 003 0.5153 0.0906 0.6059 0.2074 0.0834 0.2907 0.0000 566.1245 566.1245 0.0906 0.0000 568.3900 2023 0.5972 1.4277 1.7608 4.7600e- 003 0.2310 0.0560 0.2870 0.0620 0.0517 0.1137 0.0000 431.3688 431.3688 0.0633 0.0000 432.9506 2024 0.0519 3.2600e- 003 7.0300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.6000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.4328 1.4328 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4341 Maximum 0.5972 2.5006 2.0350 6.2000e- 003 0.5153 0.0906 0.6059 0.2074 0.0834 0.2907 0.0000 566.1245 566.1245 0.0906 0.0000 568.3900 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2022 0.2495 2.5006 2.0350 6.2000e- 003 0.5153 0.0906 0.6059 0.2074 0.0834 0.2907 0.0000 566.1243 566.1243 0.0906 0.0000 568.3898 2023 0.5972 1.4277 1.7608 4.7600e- 003 0.2310 0.0560 0.2870 0.0620 0.0517 0.1137 0.0000 431.3686 431.3686 0.0633 0.0000 432.9504 2024 0.0519 3.2600e- 003 7.0300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.6000e- 004 1.2600e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.4328 1.4328 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.4341 Maximum 0.5972 2.5006 2.0350 6.2000e- 003 0.5153 0.0906 0.6059 0.2074 0.0834 0.2907 0.0000 566.1243 566.1243 0.0906 0.0000 568.3898 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 5 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 1-1-2022 3-31-2022 0.8970 0.8970 2 4-1-2022 6-30-2022 0.6548 0.6548 3 7-1-2022 9-30-2022 0.6054 0.6054 4 10-1-2022 12-31-2022 0.6042 0.6042 5 1-1-2023 3-31-2023 0.5158 0.5158 6 4-1-2023 6-30-2023 0.5228 0.5228 7 7-1-2023 9-30-2023 0.4495 0.4495 8 10-1-2023 12-31-2023 0.5503 0.5503 9 1-1-2024 3-31-2024 0.0394 0.0394 Highest 0.8970 0.8970 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 6 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 Energy 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 130.8936 130.8936 0.0314 1.9500e- 003 132.2613 Mobile 0.1958 1.4351 2.5106 0.0125 1.0320 7.1700e- 003 1.0392 0.2764 6.6800e- 003 0.2831 0.0000 1,159.152 5 1,159.152 5 0.0489 0.0000 1,160.375 5 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.5098 0.0000 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9547 13.6932 16.6479 0.3135 7.2700e- 003 26.6513 Total 1.2818 1.5669 4.9139 0.0154 1.0320 0.1572 1.1892 0.2764 0.1567 0.4332 32.5476 1,335.123 1 1,367.670 7 1.2986 0.0102 1,403.189 7 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 7 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 Energy 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 130.8936 130.8936 0.0314 1.9500e- 003 132.2613 Mobile 0.1958 1.4351 2.5106 0.0125 1.0320 7.1700e- 003 1.0392 0.2764 6.6800e- 003 0.2831 0.0000 1,159.152 5 1,159.152 5 0.0489 0.0000 1,160.375 5 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 14.5098 0.0000 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2.9547 13.6932 16.6479 0.3135 7.2700e- 003 26.6513 Total 1.2818 1.5669 4.9139 0.0154 1.0320 0.1572 1.1892 0.2764 0.1567 0.4332 32.5476 1,335.123 1 1,367.670 7 1.2986 0.0102 1,403.189 7 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 8 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2022 2/1/2022 5 22 2 Grading Grading 2/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 87 3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/3/2022 9/3/2023 5 326 4 Paving Paving 9/4/2023 11/4/2023 5 45 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/5/2023 1/5/2024 5 45 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Residential Indoor: 287,550; Residential Outdoor: 95,850; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 6,720 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 43.5 Acres of Paving: 2.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 9 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.3300e- 003 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0118 0.1316 0.1174 2.1000e- 004 5.8000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 5.3400e- 003 5.3400e- 003 0.0000 18.4236 18.4236 5.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.5726 Total 0.0118 0.1316 0.1174 2.1000e- 004 7.3300e- 003 5.8000e- 003 0.0131 8.6000e- 004 5.3400e- 003 6.2000e- 003 0.0000 18.4236 18.4236 5.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.5726 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 2,965.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 198.00 53.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 10 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9300e- 003 0.2995 0.0440 1.0900e- 003 0.0256 8.2000e- 004 0.0264 7.0200e- 003 7.8000e- 004 7.8000e- 003 0.0000 105.1471 105.1471 6.2300e- 003 0.0000 105.3029 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.2247 1.2247 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2253 Total 7.5000e- 003 0.2999 0.0482 1.1000e- 003 0.0271 8.3000e- 004 0.0280 7.4400e- 003 7.9000e- 004 8.2300e- 003 0.0000 106.3718 106.3718 6.2600e- 003 0.0000 106.5283 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.3300e- 003 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0118 0.1316 0.1174 2.1000e- 004 5.8000e- 003 5.8000e- 003 5.3400e- 003 5.3400e- 003 0.0000 18.4236 18.4236 5.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.5726 Total 0.0118 0.1316 0.1174 2.1000e- 004 7.3300e- 003 5.8000e- 003 0.0131 8.6000e- 004 5.3400e- 003 6.2000e- 003 0.0000 18.4236 18.4236 5.9600e- 003 0.0000 18.5726 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 11 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 6.9300e- 003 0.2995 0.0440 1.0900e- 003 0.0256 8.2000e- 004 0.0264 7.0200e- 003 7.8000e- 004 7.8000e- 003 0.0000 105.1471 105.1471 6.2300e- 003 0.0000 105.3029 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 5.7000e- 004 3.7000e- 004 4.1500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5800e- 003 4.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.2247 1.2247 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2253 Total 7.5000e- 003 0.2999 0.0482 1.1000e- 003 0.0271 8.3000e- 004 0.0280 7.4400e- 003 7.9000e- 004 8.2300e- 003 0.0000 106.3718 106.3718 6.2600e- 003 0.0000 106.5283 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.1465 0.0000 0.1465 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0760 0.8299 0.5228 1.0700e- 003 0.0372 0.0372 0.0342 0.0342 0.0000 93.6064 93.6064 0.0303 0.0000 94.3632 Total 0.0760 0.8299 0.5228 1.0700e- 003 0.2850 0.0372 0.3222 0.1465 0.0342 0.1807 0.0000 93.6064 93.6064 0.0303 0.0000 94.3632 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 12 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0164 5.0000e- 005 6.2200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.2500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 4.8430 4.8430 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.8456 Total 2.2700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0164 5.0000e- 005 6.2200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.2500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 4.8430 4.8430 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.8456 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.2850 0.0000 0.2850 0.1465 0.0000 0.1465 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0760 0.8299 0.5228 1.0700e- 003 0.0372 0.0372 0.0342 0.0342 0.0000 93.6063 93.6063 0.0303 0.0000 94.3631 Total 0.0760 0.8299 0.5228 1.0700e- 003 0.2850 0.0372 0.3222 0.1465 0.0342 0.1807 0.0000 93.6063 93.6063 0.0303 0.0000 94.3631 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 13 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0164 5.0000e- 005 6.2200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.2500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 4.8430 4.8430 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.8456 Total 2.2700e- 003 1.4700e- 003 0.0164 5.0000e- 005 6.2200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 6.2500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.6800e- 003 0.0000 4.8430 4.8430 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.8456 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0830 0.8475 0.8299 1.3400e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 118.0687 118.0687 0.0382 0.0000 119.0234 Total 0.0830 0.8475 0.8299 1.3400e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 118.0687 118.0687 0.0382 0.0000 119.0234 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 14 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.9100e- 003 0.3515 0.0669 1.0100e- 003 0.0253 6.0000e- 004 0.0259 7.2900e- 003 5.7000e- 004 7.8600e- 003 0.0000 96.7861 96.7861 7.0600e- 003 0.0000 96.9625 Worker 0.0601 0.0389 0.4335 1.4200e- 003 0.1643 9.6000e- 004 0.1653 0.0436 8.8000e- 004 0.0445 0.0000 128.0249 128.0249 2.7800e- 003 0.0000 128.0945 Total 0.0690 0.3904 0.5004 2.4300e- 003 0.1896 1.5600e- 003 0.1911 0.0509 1.4500e- 003 0.0524 0.0000 224.8110 224.8110 9.8400e- 003 0.0000 225.0569 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0830 0.8475 0.8299 1.3400e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 118.0686 118.0686 0.0382 0.0000 119.0232 Total 0.0830 0.8475 0.8299 1.3400e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 118.0686 118.0686 0.0382 0.0000 119.0232 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 15 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 8.9100e- 003 0.3515 0.0669 1.0100e- 003 0.0253 6.0000e- 004 0.0259 7.2900e- 003 5.7000e- 004 7.8600e- 003 0.0000 96.7861 96.7861 7.0600e- 003 0.0000 96.9625 Worker 0.0601 0.0389 0.4335 1.4200e- 003 0.1643 9.6000e- 004 0.1653 0.0436 8.8000e- 004 0.0445 0.0000 128.0249 128.0249 2.7800e- 003 0.0000 128.0945 Total 0.0690 0.3904 0.5004 2.4300e- 003 0.1896 1.5600e- 003 0.1911 0.0509 1.4500e- 003 0.0524 0.0000 224.8110 224.8110 9.8400e- 003 0.0000 225.0569 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0886 0.8968 0.9535 1.5600e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 136.9042 136.9042 0.0443 0.0000 138.0111 Total 0.0886 0.8968 0.9535 1.5600e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 136.9042 136.9042 0.0443 0.0000 138.0111 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 16 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9000e- 003 0.3047 0.0675 1.1400e- 003 0.0293 3.1000e- 004 0.0296 8.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 8.7500e- 003 0.0000 109.2141 109.2141 6.2600e- 003 0.0000 109.3705 Worker 0.0654 0.0406 0.4631 1.5800e- 003 0.1904 1.0800e- 003 0.1915 0.0506 1.0000e- 003 0.0516 0.0000 142.7420 142.7420 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 142.8144 Total 0.0733 0.3453 0.5306 2.7200e- 003 0.2197 1.3900e- 003 0.2211 0.0590 1.3000e- 003 0.0603 0.0000 251.9560 251.9560 9.1600e- 003 0.0000 252.1849 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0886 0.8968 0.9535 1.5600e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 136.9040 136.9040 0.0443 0.0000 138.0110 Total 0.0886 0.8968 0.9535 1.5600e- 003 0.0452 0.0452 0.0416 0.0416 0.0000 136.9040 136.9040 0.0443 0.0000 138.0110 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 17 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 7.9000e- 003 0.3047 0.0675 1.1400e- 003 0.0293 3.1000e- 004 0.0296 8.4500e- 003 3.0000e- 004 8.7500e- 003 0.0000 109.2141 109.2141 6.2600e- 003 0.0000 109.3705 Worker 0.0654 0.0406 0.4631 1.5800e- 003 0.1904 1.0800e- 003 0.1915 0.0506 1.0000e- 003 0.0516 0.0000 142.7420 142.7420 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 142.8144 Total 0.0733 0.3453 0.5306 2.7200e- 003 0.2197 1.3900e- 003 0.2211 0.0590 1.3000e- 003 0.0603 0.0000 251.9560 251.9560 9.1600e- 003 0.0000 252.1849 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.5 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0156 0.1572 0.2131 3.3000e- 004 7.9700e- 003 7.9700e- 003 7.3300e- 003 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 28.9570 28.9570 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 29.1911 Paving 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0189 0.1572 0.2131 3.3000e- 004 7.9700e- 003 7.9700e- 003 7.3300e- 003 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 28.9570 28.9570 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 29.1911 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 18 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.5000e- 004 5.3000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8538 1.8538 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8547 Total 8.5000e- 004 5.3000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8538 1.8538 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8547 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0156 0.1572 0.2131 3.3000e- 004 7.9700e- 003 7.9700e- 003 7.3300e- 003 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 28.9570 28.9570 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 29.1911 Paving 3.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0189 0.1572 0.2131 3.3000e- 004 7.9700e- 003 7.9700e- 003 7.3300e- 003 7.3300e- 003 0.0000 28.9570 28.9570 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 29.1911 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 19 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.5000e- 004 5.3000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8538 1.8538 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8547 Total 8.5000e- 004 5.3000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.4900e- 003 6.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8538 1.8538 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.8547 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.4088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8300e- 003 0.0261 0.0362 6.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1142 Total 0.4126 0.0261 0.0362 6.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1142 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 20 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0200e- 003 1.8700e- 003 0.0214 7.0000e- 005 8.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.8400e- 003 2.3300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 6.5913 6.5913 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.5946 Total 3.0200e- 003 1.8700e- 003 0.0214 7.0000e- 005 8.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.8400e- 003 2.3300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 6.5913 6.5913 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.5946 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.4088 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 3.8300e- 003 0.0261 0.0362 6.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1141 Total 0.4126 0.0261 0.0362 6.0000e- 005 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 1.4200e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 3.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1141 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 21 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.0200e- 003 1.8700e- 003 0.0214 7.0000e- 005 8.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.8400e- 003 2.3300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 6.5913 6.5913 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.5946 Total 3.0200e- 003 1.8700e- 003 0.0214 7.0000e- 005 8.7900e- 003 5.0000e- 005 8.8400e- 003 2.3300e- 003 5.0000e- 005 2.3800e- 003 0.0000 6.5913 6.5913 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 6.5946 Mitigated Construction Off-Site 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.5000e- 004 3.0500e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6392 Total 0.0515 3.0500e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6392 Unmitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 22 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.7945 0.7945 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7949 Total 3.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.7945 0.7945 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7949 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.0511 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 4.5000e- 004 3.0500e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6392 Total 0.0515 3.0500e- 003 4.5300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6392 Mitigated Construction On-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 23 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 3.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.7945 0.7945 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7949 Total 3.6000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.5000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1100e- 003 2.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.7945 0.7945 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7949 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 24 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.1958 1.4351 2.5106 0.0125 1.0320 7.1700e- 003 1.0392 0.2764 6.6800e- 003 0.2831 0.0000 1,159.152 5 1,159.152 5 0.0489 0.0000 1,160.375 5 Unmitigated 0.1958 1.4351 2.5106 0.0125 1.0320 7.1700e- 003 1.0392 0.2764 6.6800e- 003 0.2831 0.0000 1,159.152 5 1,159.152 5 0.0489 0.0000 1,160.375 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 718.08 718.08 718.08 2,453,788 2,453,788 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 0.00 0.00 Apartments Low Rise 73.20 73.20 73.20 250,136 250,136 Total 791.28 791.28 791.28 2,703,924 2,703,924 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 66 28 6 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 39 9 Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 25 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.4525 40.4525 0.0297 3.0000e- 004 41.2827 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 40.4525 40.4525 0.0297 3.0000e- 004 41.2827 NaturalGas Mitigated 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 90.4411 90.4411 1.7300e- 003 1.6600e- 003 90.9786 NaturalGas Unmitigated 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 90.4411 90.4411 1.7300e- 003 1.6600e- 003 90.9786 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 City Park 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Parking Lot 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Apartments Low Rise 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 26 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 124210 6.7000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6283 6.6283 1.3000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.6677 Apartments Mid Rise 1.57059e +006 8.4700e- 003 0.0724 0.0308 4.6000e- 004 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 0.0000 83.8128 83.8128 1.6100e- 003 1.5400e- 003 84.3109 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 90.4411 90.4411 1.7400e- 003 1.6600e- 003 90.9786 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 27 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 124210 6.7000e- 004 5.7200e- 003 2.4400e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 4.6000e- 004 0.0000 6.6283 6.6283 1.3000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.6677 Apartments Mid Rise 1.57059e +006 8.4700e- 003 0.0724 0.0308 4.6000e- 004 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 5.8500e- 003 0.0000 83.8128 83.8128 1.6100e- 003 1.5400e- 003 84.3109 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.1400e- 003 0.0781 0.0332 5.0000e- 004 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 6.3100e- 003 0.0000 90.4411 90.4411 1.7400e- 003 1.6600e- 003 90.9786 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 28 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 45704.5 2.8263 2.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8843 Apartments Mid Rise 569262 35.2022 0.0258 2.6000e- 004 35.9246 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 39200 2.4241 1.7800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4738 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 40.4525 0.0297 3.0000e- 004 41.2827 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 29 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 45704.5 2.8263 2.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.8843 Apartments Mid Rise 569262 35.2022 0.0258 2.6000e- 004 35.9246 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 39200 2.4241 1.7800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.4738 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 40.4525 0.0297 3.0000e- 004 41.2827 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 30 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 Unmitigated 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0460 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.4651 0.0368 0.9027 2.3000e- 003 0.1356 0.1356 0.1356 0.1356 15.0831 28.9846 44.0677 0.0450 1.0200e- 003 45.4973 Landscaping 0.0444 0.0169 1.4674 8.0000e- 005 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.3991 2.3991 2.3100e- 003 0.0000 2.4570 Total 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 31 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.0460 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5214 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 0.4651 0.0368 0.9027 2.3000e- 003 0.1356 0.1356 0.1356 0.1356 15.0831 28.9846 44.0677 0.0450 1.0200e- 003 45.4973 Landscaping 0.0444 0.0169 1.4674 8.0000e- 005 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 8.1300e- 003 0.0000 2.3991 2.3991 2.3100e- 003 0.0000 2.4570 Total 1.0769 0.0537 2.3701 2.3800e- 003 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 0.1437 15.0831 31.3837 46.4668 0.0473 1.0200e- 003 47.9542 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 32 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 16.6479 0.3135 7.2700e- 003 26.6513 Unmitigated 16.6479 0.3135 7.2700e- 003 26.6513 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 0.65154 / 0.410754 1.0135 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 1.7102 Apartments Mid Rise 8.60033 / 5.42195 13.3784 0.2881 6.7000e- 003 22.5750 City Park 0 / 3.14551 2.1610 1.5900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.2054 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.0615089 / 0.037699 0.0949 2.0600e- 003 5.0000e- 005 0.1607 Total 16.6479 0.3135 7.2800e- 003 26.6513 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 33 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 0.65154 / 0.410754 1.0135 0.0218 5.1000e- 004 1.7102 Apartments Mid Rise 8.60033 / 5.42195 13.3784 0.2881 6.7000e- 003 22.5750 City Park 0 / 3.14551 2.1610 1.5900e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.2054 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.0615089 / 0.037699 0.0949 2.0600e- 003 5.0000e- 005 0.1607 Total 16.6479 0.3135 7.2800e- 003 26.6513 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 34 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Unmitigated 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 4.6 0.9338 0.0552 0.0000 2.3134 Apartments Mid Rise 60.72 12.3256 0.7284 0.0000 30.5362 City Park 0.23 0.0467 2.7600e- 003 0.0000 0.1157 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 5.93 1.2037 0.0711 0.0000 2.9822 Total 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 35 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low Rise 4.6 0.9338 0.0552 0.0000 2.3134 Apartments Mid Rise 60.72 12.3256 0.7284 0.0000 30.5362 City Park 0.23 0.0467 2.7600e- 003 0.0000 0.1157 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 5.93 1.2037 0.0711 0.0000 2.9822 Total 14.5098 0.8575 0.0000 35.9474 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 36 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 11.0 Vegetation User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:30 PMPage 37 of 37 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Annual 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Parking Lot 280.00 Space 2.52 112,000.00 0 City Park 2.64 Acre 2.64 115,182.00 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 1.04 1000sqft 0.02 1,040.00 0 Apartments Low Rise 10.00 Dwelling Unit 0.63 10,000.00 29 Apartments Mid Rise 132.00 Dwelling Unit 3.47 132,000.00 378 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 10 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.4 28 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2024Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 136.33 0.1CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.001N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula Riverside-South Coast County, Summer CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 1 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Utility GHG emissions factor interpolated between 453.2 lbCO2/Mwh reported for 2019 and 0 lbCo2/MWh assumed for 2045, under SB100. Land Use - City Park includes Landscaping area (115,182 SF). The proposed number of apartment units were 134 but for a conservative approach and keeping consistency with the traffic study, 142 (mid and low size) units were assumed for the modeling. Construction Phase - Approx. construction scedule provied by the client. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Approx assumption of number graders required for preliminary grading cut of 27,322 CY. Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Approx assumption of number graders required for preliminary grading cut of 27,322 CY. Trips and VMT - Grading - Site preparation would require preliminary grading cut of approximately 27,322 cubic yards, fill of 3,562 cubic yards, and export of 23,716 cubic yards. Vehicle Trips - The Project is not anticipated to employ any full-time equivalent staff. The trip rate is taken from the traffic study. Area Coating - Energy Use - Adjusted energy values for Title 24 2019 Energy Efficiency standards. Fleet Mix - Architectural Coating - Woodstoves - Water And Wastewater - Solid Waste - CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 2 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 87.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 326.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 45.00 tblEnergyUse T24E 772.17 517.05 tblEnergyUse T24E 877.14 587.33 tblEnergyUse T24NG 8,764.08 5,868.43 tblEnergyUse T24NG 9,544.50 6,391.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 23,716.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 114,998.40 115,182.00 tblProjectCharacteristics CH4IntensityFactor 0.029 0.1 tblProjectCharacteristics CO2IntensityFactor 702.44 136.33 tblProjectCharacteristics N2OIntensityFactor 0.006 0.001 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CC_TTP 48.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CNW_TTP 19.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips CW_TTP 33.00 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 6.39 5.44 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 7.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.86 5.44 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 7.32 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.65 5.44 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 7.32 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 3 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 4 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 2.0929 38.6828 18.5576 0.1207 6.6977 0.8558 7.5534 3.4060 0.7873 4.1933 0.0000 12,629.73 32 12,629.73 32 1.2005 0.0000 12,659.74 52 2023 20.7952 14.1623 17.8454 0.0507 2.5525 0.5322 3.0848 0.6846 0.4898 1.1744 0.0000 5,076.396 4 5,076.396 4 0.6736 0.0000 5,093.237 0 2024 20.7748 1.2983 2.9905 6.7900e- 003 0.4471 0.0634 0.5105 0.1186 0.0632 0.1818 0.0000 662.1006 662.1006 0.0233 0.0000 662.6835 Maximum 20.7952 38.6828 18.5576 0.1207 6.6977 0.8558 7.5534 3.4060 0.7873 4.1933 0.0000 12,629.73 32 12,629.73 32 1.2005 0.0000 12,659.74 52 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2022 2.0929 38.6828 18.5576 0.1207 6.6977 0.8558 7.5534 3.4060 0.7873 4.1933 0.0000 12,629.73 32 12,629.73 32 1.2005 0.0000 12,659.74 52 2023 20.7952 14.1623 17.8454 0.0507 2.5525 0.5322 3.0848 0.6846 0.4898 1.1744 0.0000 5,076.396 4 5,076.396 4 0.6736 0.0000 5,093.237 0 2024 20.7748 1.2983 2.9905 6.7900e- 003 0.4471 0.0634 0.5105 0.1186 0.0632 0.1818 0.0000 662.1006 662.1006 0.0233 0.0000 662.6835 Maximum 20.7952 38.6828 18.5576 0.1207 6.6977 0.8558 7.5534 3.4060 0.7873 4.1933 0.0000 12,629.73 32 12,629.73 32 1.2005 0.0000 12,659.74 52 Mitigated Construction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 5 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 6 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 Energy 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 Mobile 1.2737 7.7862 15.5491 0.0726 5.7646 0.0394 5.8040 1.5420 0.0367 1.5787 7,424.276 7 7,424.276 7 0.2965 7,431.690 3 Total 41.9969 11.2956 99.6848 0.2602 5.7646 10.9861 16.7507 1.5420 10.9834 12.5254 1,330.102 4 10,547.70 32 11,877.80 56 4.2940 0.1003 12,015.04 39 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 Energy 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 Mobile 1.2737 7.7862 15.5491 0.0726 5.7646 0.0394 5.8040 1.5420 0.0367 1.5787 7,424.276 7 7,424.276 7 0.2965 7,431.690 3 Total 41.9969 11.2956 99.6848 0.2602 5.7646 10.9861 16.7507 1.5420 10.9834 12.5254 1,330.102 4 10,547.70 32 11,877.80 56 4.2940 0.1003 12,015.04 39 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 7 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/1/2022 2/1/2022 5 22 2 Grading Grading 2/2/2022 6/2/2022 5 87 3 Building Construction Building Construction 6/3/2022 9/3/2023 5 326 4 Paving Paving 9/4/2023 11/4/2023 5 45 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 11/5/2023 1/5/2024 5 45 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Residential Indoor: 287,550; Residential Outdoor: 95,850; Non-Residential Indoor: 0; Non-Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area: 6,720 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 11 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 43.5 Acres of Paving: 2.52 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 8 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Site Preparation 5 13.00 0.00 2,965.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 5 13.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 7 198.00 53.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 40.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 9 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.6668 0.0000 0.6668 0.0779 0.0000 0.0779 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0738 11.9602 10.6735 0.0191 0.5277 0.5277 0.4855 0.4855 1,846.234 7 1,846.234 7 0.5971 1,861.162 5 Total 1.0738 11.9602 10.6735 0.0191 0.6668 0.5277 1.1944 0.0779 0.4855 0.5634 1,846.234 7 1,846.234 7 0.5971 1,861.162 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6162 26.6911 3.7379 0.1003 2.3573 0.0739 2.4312 0.6462 0.0707 0.7169 10,650.13 85 10,650.13 85 0.6004 10,665.14 86 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Total 0.6738 26.7227 4.1812 0.1016 2.5026 0.0747 2.5773 0.6847 0.0715 0.7562 10,783.49 85 10,783.49 85 0.6034 10,798.58 27 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 10 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Site Preparation - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 0.6668 0.0000 0.6668 0.0779 0.0000 0.0779 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.0738 11.9602 10.6735 0.0191 0.5277 0.5277 0.4855 0.4855 0.0000 1,846.234 7 1,846.234 7 0.5971 1,861.162 5 Total 1.0738 11.9602 10.6735 0.0191 0.6668 0.5277 1.1944 0.0779 0.4855 0.5634 0.0000 1,846.234 7 1,846.234 7 0.5971 1,861.162 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.6162 26.6911 3.7379 0.1003 2.3573 0.0739 2.4312 0.6462 0.0707 0.7169 10,650.13 85 10,650.13 85 0.6004 10,665.14 86 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Total 0.6738 26.7227 4.1812 0.1016 2.5026 0.0747 2.5773 0.6847 0.0715 0.7562 10,783.49 85 10,783.49 85 0.6034 10,798.58 27 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 11 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7462 19.0782 12.0176 0.0245 0.8549 0.8549 0.7865 0.7865 2,372.031 1 2,372.031 1 0.7672 2,391.210 2 Total 1.7462 19.0782 12.0176 0.0245 6.5523 0.8549 7.4073 3.3675 0.7865 4.1540 2,372.031 1 2,372.031 1 0.7672 2,391.210 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Total 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 12 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Grading - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.5523 0.0000 6.5523 3.3675 0.0000 3.3675 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.7462 19.0782 12.0176 0.0245 0.8549 0.8549 0.7865 0.7865 0.0000 2,372.031 1 2,372.031 1 0.7672 2,391.210 2 Total 1.7462 19.0782 12.0176 0.0245 6.5523 0.8549 7.4073 3.3675 0.7865 4.1540 0.0000 2,372.031 1 2,372.031 1 0.7672 2,391.210 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Total 0.0577 0.0316 0.4433 1.3400e- 003 0.1453 8.3000e- 004 0.1461 0.0385 7.7000e- 004 0.0393 133.3600 133.3600 2.9600e- 003 133.4341 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 13 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0995 11.2245 10.9916 0.0178 0.5982 0.5982 0.5504 0.5504 1,723.821 3 1,723.821 3 0.5575 1,737.759 3 Total 1.0995 11.2245 10.9916 0.0178 0.5982 0.5982 0.5504 0.5504 1,723.821 3 1,723.821 3 0.5575 1,737.759 3 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1154 4.6273 0.8139 0.0136 0.3394 7.8400e- 003 0.3472 0.0977 7.5000e- 003 0.1052 1,435.903 5 1,435.903 5 0.0981 1,438.356 5 Worker 0.8780 0.4813 6.7520 0.0204 2.2132 0.0127 2.2259 0.5869 0.0117 0.5986 2,031.175 2 2,031.175 2 0.0452 2,032.304 0 Total 0.9934 5.1086 7.5659 0.0340 2.5525 0.0205 2.5731 0.6847 0.0192 0.7038 3,467.078 6 3,467.078 6 0.1433 3,470.660 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 14 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2022 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0995 11.2245 10.9916 0.0178 0.5982 0.5982 0.5504 0.5504 0.0000 1,723.821 3 1,723.821 3 0.5575 1,737.759 3 Total 1.0995 11.2245 10.9916 0.0178 0.5982 0.5982 0.5504 0.5504 0.0000 1,723.821 3 1,723.821 3 0.5575 1,737.759 3 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1154 4.6273 0.8139 0.0136 0.3394 7.8400e- 003 0.3472 0.0977 7.5000e- 003 0.1052 1,435.903 5 1,435.903 5 0.0981 1,438.356 5 Worker 0.8780 0.4813 6.7520 0.0204 2.2132 0.0127 2.2259 0.5869 0.0117 0.5986 2,031.175 2 2,031.175 2 0.0452 2,032.304 0 Total 0.9934 5.1086 7.5659 0.0340 2.5525 0.0205 2.5731 0.6847 0.0192 0.7038 3,467.078 6 3,467.078 6 0.1433 3,470.660 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 15 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0124 10.2488 10.8967 0.0178 0.5163 0.5163 0.4750 0.4750 1,724.697 6 1,724.697 6 0.5578 1,738.642 7 Total 1.0124 10.2488 10.8967 0.0178 0.5163 0.5163 0.4750 0.4750 1,724.697 6 1,724.697 6 0.5578 1,738.642 7 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0885 3.4796 0.7174 0.0132 0.3394 3.5000e- 003 0.3429 0.0977 3.3500e- 003 0.1011 1,397.713 6 1,397.713 6 0.0753 1,399.595 9 Worker 0.8233 0.4340 6.2313 0.0196 2.2132 0.0124 2.2256 0.5869 0.0114 0.5984 1,953.985 2 1,953.985 2 0.0405 1,954.998 4 Total 0.9118 3.9136 6.9487 0.0328 2.5525 0.0159 2.5684 0.6846 0.0148 0.6994 3,351.698 8 3,351.698 8 0.1158 3,354.594 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 16 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Building Construction - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.0124 10.2488 10.8967 0.0178 0.5163 0.5163 0.4750 0.4750 0.0000 1,724.697 6 1,724.697 6 0.5578 1,738.642 7 Total 1.0124 10.2488 10.8967 0.0178 0.5163 0.5163 0.4750 0.4750 0.0000 1,724.697 6 1,724.697 6 0.5578 1,738.642 7 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0885 3.4796 0.7174 0.0132 0.3394 3.5000e- 003 0.3429 0.0977 3.3500e- 003 0.1011 1,397.713 6 1,397.713 6 0.0753 1,399.595 9 Worker 0.8233 0.4340 6.2313 0.0196 2.2132 0.0124 2.2256 0.5869 0.0114 0.5984 1,953.985 2 1,953.985 2 0.0405 1,954.998 4 Total 0.9118 3.9136 6.9487 0.0328 2.5525 0.0159 2.5684 0.6846 0.0148 0.6994 3,351.698 8 3,351.698 8 0.1158 3,354.594 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 17 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6913 6.9858 9.4708 0.0147 0.3543 0.3543 0.3260 0.3260 1,418.650 0 1,418.650 0 0.4588 1,430.120 5 Paving 0.1467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8380 6.9858 9.4708 0.0147 0.3543 0.3543 0.3260 0.3260 1,418.650 0 1,418.650 0 0.4588 1,430.120 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0219 0.3147 9.9000e- 004 0.1118 6.3000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296 5.8000e- 004 0.0302 98.6861 98.6861 2.0500e- 003 98.7373 Total 0.0416 0.0219 0.3147 9.9000e- 004 0.1118 6.3000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296 5.8000e- 004 0.0302 98.6861 98.6861 2.0500e- 003 98.7373 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 18 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Paving - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 0.6913 6.9858 9.4708 0.0147 0.3543 0.3543 0.3260 0.3260 0.0000 1,418.650 0 1,418.650 0 0.4588 1,430.120 5 Paving 0.1467 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.8380 6.9858 9.4708 0.0147 0.3543 0.3543 0.3260 0.3260 0.0000 1,418.650 0 1,418.650 0 0.4588 1,430.120 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0416 0.0219 0.3147 9.9000e- 004 0.1118 6.3000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296 5.8000e- 004 0.0302 98.6861 98.6861 2.0500e- 003 98.7373 Total 0.0416 0.0219 0.3147 9.9000e- 004 0.1118 6.3000e- 004 0.1124 0.0296 5.8000e- 004 0.0302 98.6861 98.6861 2.0500e- 003 98.7373 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 19 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 20.4373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 20.6289 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1663 0.0877 1.2589 3.9600e- 003 0.4471 2.5000e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.3100e- 003 0.1209 394.7445 394.7445 8.1900e- 003 394.9492 Total 0.1663 0.0877 1.2589 3.9600e- 003 0.4471 2.5000e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.3100e- 003 0.1209 394.7445 394.7445 8.1900e- 003 394.9492 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 20 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 20.4373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1917 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Total 20.6289 1.3030 1.8111 2.9700e- 003 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0168 281.8690 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1663 0.0877 1.2589 3.9600e- 003 0.4471 2.5000e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.3100e- 003 0.1209 394.7445 394.7445 8.1900e- 003 394.9492 Total 0.1663 0.0877 1.2589 3.9600e- 003 0.4471 2.5000e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.3100e- 003 0.1209 394.7445 394.7445 8.1900e- 003 394.9492 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 21 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 20.4373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 20.6180 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1567 0.0795 1.1804 3.8200e- 003 0.4471 2.4800e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.2800e- 003 0.1209 380.6526 380.6526 7.4700e- 003 380.8392 Total 0.1567 0.0795 1.1804 3.8200e- 003 0.4471 2.4800e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.2800e- 003 0.1209 380.6526 380.6526 7.4700e- 003 380.8392 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 22 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2024 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 20.4373 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.1808 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Total 20.6180 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 003 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1567 0.0795 1.1804 3.8200e- 003 0.4471 2.4800e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.2800e- 003 0.1209 380.6526 380.6526 7.4700e- 003 380.8392 Total 0.1567 0.0795 1.1804 3.8200e- 003 0.4471 2.4800e- 003 0.4496 0.1186 2.2800e- 003 0.1209 380.6526 380.6526 7.4700e- 003 380.8392 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 23 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 1.2737 7.7862 15.5491 0.0726 5.7646 0.0394 5.8040 1.5420 0.0367 1.5787 7,424.276 7 7,424.276 7 0.2965 7,431.690 3 Unmitigated 1.2737 7.7862 15.5491 0.0726 5.7646 0.0394 5.8040 1.5420 0.0367 1.5787 7,424.276 7 7,424.276 7 0.2965 7,431.690 3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 718.08 718.08 718.08 2,453,788 2,453,788 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.00 0.00 0.00 Apartments Low Rise 73.20 73.20 73.20 250,136 250,136 Total 791.28 791.28 791.28 2,703,924 2,703,924 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 24 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 66 28 6 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 52 39 9 Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Mid Rise 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 City Park 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Parking Lot 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Recreational Swimming Pool 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Apartments Low Rise 0.551648 0.035769 0.187848 0.110184 0.013450 0.004660 0.017552 0.070120 0.001413 0.001134 0.004476 0.000905 0.000840 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 25 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 340.301 3.6700e- 003 0.0314 0.0134 2.0000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 40.0355 40.0355 7.7000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 40.2734 Apartments Mid Rise 4302.99 0.0464 0.3966 0.1687 2.5300e- 003 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 506.2346 506.2346 9.7000e- 003 9.2800e- 003 509.2429 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 26 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low Rise 0.340301 3.6700e- 003 0.0314 0.0134 2.0000e- 004 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 40.0355 40.0355 7.7000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 40.2734 Apartments Mid Rise 4.30299 0.0464 0.3966 0.1687 2.5300e- 003 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 506.2346 506.2346 9.7000e- 003 9.2800e- 003 509.2429 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0501 0.4279 0.1821 2.7300e- 003 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 0.0346 546.2700 546.2700 0.0105 0.0100 549.5162 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 27 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 Unmitigated 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2520 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.8572 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 37.2091 2.9463 72.2144 0.1842 10.8471 10.8471 10.8471 10.8471 1,330.102 4 2,556.000 0 3,886.102 4 3.9666 0.0903 4,012.170 8 Landscaping 0.3548 0.1352 11.7392 6.2000e- 004 0.0650 0.0650 0.0650 0.0650 21.1565 21.1565 0.0204 21.6666 Total 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 28 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.2520 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 2.8572 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hearth 37.2091 2.9463 72.2144 0.1842 10.8471 10.8471 10.8471 10.8471 1,330.102 4 2,556.000 0 3,886.102 4 3.9666 0.0903 4,012.170 8 Landscaping 0.3548 0.1352 11.7392 6.2000e- 004 0.0650 0.0650 0.0650 0.0650 21.1565 21.1565 0.0204 21.6666 Total 40.6731 3.0815 83.9535 0.1849 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 10.9122 1,330.102 4 2,577.156 5 3,907.258 9 3.9870 0.0903 4,033.837 4 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 29 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer 11.0 Vegetation Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Date: 4/10/2021 5:35 PMPage 30 of 30 Rendezvous II Apartment - City of Temecula - Riverside-South Coast County, Summer Energy Calculations Construction Fuel Consumption- Year 1 Phase Name Off-road Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horsepower Load Factor Number of days Diesel Fuel Usage Site Preparation Graders 1 8 187 0.41 22 675 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 8 97 0.37 87 4,996 Grading Graders 1 8.00 187 0.41 87 2,668 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 247 0.40 87 3,438 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 87 3,747 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 231 0.29 151 3,540 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 151 3,225 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 151 5,690 TOTAL 22,309 Phase Name Daily Worker Trip Daily Vendor Trip Daily Hauling Trip Days per Year Total Worker Trips Total Vendor Trips Total Haul Trips Worker Trip Length (miles) Vendor Trip Length (miles) Haul Trip Length (miles) Total Worker Trip Length (miles) Total Vendor Trip Length (miles) Total Haul Trip Length (miles) Total gallons of gasoline Total gallons of diesel Site Preparation 13 0 2965 22 286 0 65230 14.70 6.90 20.00 4204.2 0 1,304,600.00 144 187,869 Grading 13 0 0 87 1,131 0 0 14.70 6.90 20.00 16,625.70 0.00 - 568 0 Building Construction 198 53 0 151 29,898 8,003 0 14.70 6.90 20.00 439,500.60 55,220.70 - 15,022 7,952 TOTAL 15,734 195,821 Construction Fuel Consumption– Year 2 Phase Name Off-road Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horsepower Load Factor Number of days Diesel Fuel Usage Building Construction Cranes 1 7 231 0.29 175 4,103 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8 89 0.2 175 3,738 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 175 6,595 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 130 0.42 45 1,966 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 45 1,094 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 45 505 TOTAL 10,160 Phase Name Daily Worker Trip Daily Vendor Trip Daily Haul Trip Days per Year Total Worker Trips Total Vendor Trips Total Haul Trips Worker Trip Length (miles) Vendor Trip Length (miles) Haul Trip Length (miles) Total Worker Trip Length (miles) Total Vendor Trip Length (miles) Total Haul Trip Length (miles) Total gallons of gasoline Total gallons of diesel Building Construction 198 53 0 175 34650 9275 0 14.70 6.90 20.00 509355 63997.5 - 17,410 9,216 Paving 10 0 0 45 450 0 0 14.70 6.90 20.00 6,615.00 0.00 - 226 0 Architectural Coating 40 0 0 45 1,800 0 0 14.70 6.90 20.00 26,460.00 0.00 - 904 0 TOTAL 18,540 9,216 Operational – Fuel Consumption Region CalYr VehClass Class MdlYr Speed Fuel Population VMT (mi/day) Trips Fuel Consumption (1000 gal/day) Fuel (gal/day) mi/gal CO2_RUNEX (tons/day) CO2 (lb/day) % of vehicle class EMFAC % vehicle class CalEEMod % vehicle class project VMT by project vehicle class (mi/yr) Gallons of fuel Riverside 2024 HHDT Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 7.000684257 756.3011319 140.0696906 0.165465187 165.4651872 4.570756813 1.560367538 3,121 0.000185942 0.07012 1.30383E-05 35.25452291 7.713060299 Riverside 2024 HHDT Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 29026.25912 4066638.194 333898.307 535.2890944 535289.0944 7.597087698 5507.095649 11,014,191 0.999814058 0.07012 0.070106962 189563.8964 24952.17956 Riverside 2024 LDA Passenger Aggregated Aggregated GAS 815755.3745 31222116.31 3860415.014 927.9383804 927938.3804 33.64675604 8571.303741 17,142,607 0.965209438 0.551648 0.532455856 1439720.168 42789.27117 Riverside 2024 LDA Passenger Aggregated Aggregated DSL 8300.734257 332357.2791 39696.73423 6.066112307 6066.112307 54.7891734 68.06447533 136,129 0.010274588 0.551648 0.005667956 15325.72209 279.721725 Riverside 2024 LDA Passenger Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 19245.4468 793030.5651 96328.06529 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0.024515974 0.551648 0.013524188 36568.37632 0 Riverside 2024 LDT1 Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 87215.44924 3197074.125 399779.9406 112.2233264 112223.3264 28.48849902 1036.057405 2,072,115 0.987765457 0.035769 0.035331383 95533.37343 3353.401433 Riverside 2024 LDT1 Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 33.92503849 761.5875986 112.0901339 0.028569249 28.56924923 26.65759931 0.32055967 641 0.000235299 0.035769 8.41643E-06 22.75738053 0.853692047 Riverside 2024 LDT1 Truck Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 906.9178441 38837.63235 4592.967234 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0.011999244 0.035769 0.000429201 1160.526747 0 Riverside 2024 LDT2 Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 265900.5251 10060983.26 1246214.147 369.3919014 369391.9014 27.23661027 3409.809305 6,819,619 0.992499078 0.187848 0.186438967 504116.797 18508.79357 Riverside 2024 LDT2 Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1794.69834 76036.99479 8823.664653 1.846802337 1846.802337 41.1722431 20.72194278 41,444 0.007500922 0.187848 0.001409033 3809.918504 92.53609269 Riverside 2024 LDT2 Truck Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 3848.536051 116064.7137 19397.24095 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0.149439415 0.187848 0.028071895 75904.27128 0 Riverside 2024 LHDT1 Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 20174.06045 660602.631 300563.4414 59.81330436 59813.30436 11.04440957 557.8477963 1,115,696 0.850560585 0.01345 0.01144004 30932.99836 2800.783344 Riverside 2024 LHDT1 Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 20444.10443 682997.5037 257161.115 31.60653644 31606.53644 21.60937517 351.6286629 703,257 0.866675351 0.01345 0.011656783 31519.05659 1458.582506 Riverside 2024 LHDT2 Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 3267.984852 105068.6423 48688.105 10.92422176 10924.22176 9.617952164 101.8637226 203,727 0.133324649 0.00466 0.000621293 1679.928687 174.6659433 Riverside 2024 LHDT2 Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 8007.116395 265411.2094 100719.4513 13.42536713 13425.36713 19.76938186 148.7420375 297,484 1 0.00466 0.00466 12600.28584 637.3636731 Riverside 2024 MCY Passenger Aggregated Aggregated GAS 37350.19664 267333.6027 74700.39328 7.000835044 7000.835044 38.1859594 61.40274972 122,805 0.034600518 0.004476 0.000154872 418.7618916 10.96638393 Riverside 2024 MDV Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 209617.0645 7458955.54 961124.8878 344.2801449 344280.1449 21.66536657 3173.940143 6,347,880 0.965399482 0.110184 0.106371577 287620.6588 13275.59624 Riverside 2024 MDV Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 4969.473742 200072.3888 24045.87751 6.590856944 6590.856944 30.35605089 73.95234331 147,905 0.728395317 0.110184 0.08025751 217010.2065 7148.828655 Riverside 2024 MDV Truck Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 2422.391654 74603.1673 12293.49831 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0.271604683 0.110184 0.02992649 80918.95555 0 Riverside 2024 MH Other Aggregated Aggregated GAS 5553.120458 44262.23336 555.5341706 8.365957307 8365.957307 5.290755348 79.24261871 158,485 0.689172428 0.00084 0.000578905 1565.31469 295.8584525 Riverside 2024 MH Other Aggregated Aggregated DSL 2582.75971 19962.96131 258.275971 1.807088122 1807.088122 11.04703255 20.27633164 40,553 0.310827572 0.00084 0.000261095 705.9814703 63.90688784 Riverside 2024 MHDT Truck Aggregated Aggregated GAS 2170.71277 115834.6966 43431.6211 21.49531652 21495.31652 5.38883419 200.5942273 401,188 0.103936293 0.017552 0.00182429 4932.740991 915.3632896 Riverside 2024 MHDT Truck Aggregated Aggregated DSL 15777.14199 998643.1604 151888.6916 84.72000841 84720.00841 11.78757154 937.3142773 1,874,629 0.896063707 0.017552 0.01572771 42526.53306 3607.743367 Riverside 2024 OBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated GAS 587.5609789 25776.9601 11755.92007 4.848344529 4848.344529 5.31665189 45.35881895 90,718 0.484546533 0.001413 0.000684664 1851.2801 348.2041215 Riverside 2024 OBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated DSL 369.7331619 27421.15061 3490.609076 2.880454202 2880.454202 9.519731502 31.40322982 62,806 0.515453467 0.001413 0.000728336 1969.364512 206.8718547 Riverside 2024 SBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated GAS 521.446174 20532.4158 2085.784696 2.258395914 2258.395914 9.091592699 19.78394094 39,568 0.351101712 0.000905 0.000317747 859.1638739 94.50091995 Riverside 2024 SBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated DSL 1198.021076 37947.54904 13824.99712 4.881150915 4881.150915 7.774303581 49.94828171 99,897 0.648898288 0.000905 0.000587253 1587.887346 204.2481786 Riverside 2024 UBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated GAS 166.3958246 23427.66786 665.5832982 3.649202734 3649.202734 6.41994144 34.53513853 69,070 0.38171218 0.001134 0.000432862 1170.424903 182.3108378 Riverside 2024 UBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated DSL 0.141961099 11.67769301 0.567844395 0.001254697 1.254696744 9.30718364 0.014078255 28 0.000498209 0.001134 5.64969E-07 1.527633268 0.164134858 Riverside 2024 UBUS Bus Aggregated Aggregated ELEC 4.058469431 248.5082415 16.23387772 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0.955117893 0.001134 0.001083104 2928.630063 0 Gasoline Sum 82,757 Diesel Sum 38,653 Electricity Consumption Land use kWh/yr Apartments Low Rise 45704.5 Apartments Mid Rise 569262 City Park 0 Parking Lot 39200 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 MWh/yr 654.1665 Natural Gas Consumption Land use kBTU/yr Apartments Low Rise 124210 Apartments Mid Rise 1570590.00 City Park 0 Parking Lot 0 Recreational Swimming Pool 0 MMTU/yr 1694.8 Appendix B – Noise Modeling Construction Source Noise Prediction Model Location Distance to Nearest Receptor in feet Equipment Usage Factor1 Threshold 125 Grader 1 Location 1 40 Dozer 1 Backhoe 1 Ground Type hard Source Height 8 Receiver Height 5 Ground Factor2 0.00 Predicted Noise Level 3 Grader 85.0 Dozer 85.0 Backhoe 80.0 Sources: 1 Obtained from the FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model, January 2006. Table 1. 2 Based on Table 4-26 from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018 (pg 86). 3 Based on the following from the Federal Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, 2018 (pg 176 and 177). Leq(equip) = E.L.+10*log (U.F.) - 20*log (D/50) - 10*G*log (D/50) Where: E.L. = Emission Level; U.F.= Usage Factor; G = Constant that accounts for topography and ground effects (FTA 2018: pg 86); and D = Distance from source to receiver. 88.6 Reference Noise Levels (Lmax) at 50 feet1 85 80 90.6 Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA) 75.0 Combined Predicted Noise Level (Leq dBA at 50 feet) Leq dBA at 50 feet3 85 Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator Existing ConditionsProject: Rendezvous Phase II Apartments ProjectNoise Level Descriptor:CNELSite Conditions:HardTraffic Input:ADTTraffic K-Factor:CNEL, Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night(dBA)5,6,770 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA#######1 Rancho California Rd. Margarita Rd.tofino Apartme31,60050 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.3 133 419 1325 41912 Rancho California Rd. Portofino Apartments Moraga Rd.33,40050 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.6 140 443 1401 44303 Rancho California Rd. Moroga Rd. Ynex Rd.35,45040 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 69.0 78 245 776 24554 Rancho California Rd. Ynex Rd.Ave/Old Town57,10040 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.1 125 395 1250 39545 Portofino Apartments1,80025 88 112 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 51.0 1 4 12 396 Moroga Rd. Rancho California Rd.Margarita Roa12,00040 85 115 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 64.2 26 82 260 8237 Moroga Rd. Rancho California Rd.ncho California2,10025 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 51.8 1 5 15 468 Ynex Rd. Rancho California Rd. Overland Dr32,60045 75 125 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 70.2 101 321 1014 32069 Ynex Rd. Rancho California Rd. Santiago Rd34,90045 85 115 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 70.3 106 336 1063 33611011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041InputSpeed Traffic Distribution CharacteristicsOutputDistance to Contour, (feet)3Distance to Directional Centerline, (feet)4Segment Description and LocationADT Traffic Noise Spreadsheet Calculator Existing Plus Project ConditionsProject: Rendezvous Phase II Apartments ProjectNoise Level Descriptor:CNELSite Conditions:HardTraffic Input:ADTTraffic K-Factor:CNEL, Number Name From To (mph) Near Far % Auto % Medium % Heavy % Day % Eve % Night(dBA)5,6,770 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA#######1 Rancho California Rd. Margarita Rd.tofino Apartme31,70050 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.3 133 420 1330 42042 Rancho California Rd. Portofino Apartments Moraga Rd.34,10050 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.6 143 452 1430 45233 Rancho California Rd. Moroga Rd. Ynex Rd.36,05040 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 69.1 79 250 789 24964 Rancho California Rd. Ynex Rd.Ave/Old Town57,50040 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 71.1 126 398 1259 39815 Portofino Apartments1,80025 88 112 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 51.0 1 4 12 396 Moroga Rd. Rancho California Rd.Margarita Roa12,10040 85 115 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 64.2 26 83 263 8307 Moroga Rd. Rancho California Rd.ncho California2,10025 80 120 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0% 7.5% 7.5% 51.8 1 5 15 468 Ynex Rd. Rancho California Rd. Overland Dr35,00045 75 125 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 70.5 109 344 1088 34429 Ynex Rd. Rancho California Rd. Santiago Rd32,60045 85 115 97.5% 1.5% 1.0% 85.0%7.5% 7.5% 70.0 99 314 993 31391011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041Input OutputADTSpeedDistance to Directional Centerline, (feet)4Traffic Distribution CharacteristicsSegment Description and LocationDistance to Contour, (feet)3 Appendix C – Phase 1 ESA PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, California 92592 Report Date: September 6, 2017 Partner Project No. 17-195274.1 Prepared for: Temecula Village Development, L.P. 7210 Jordan Avenue, Suite B7 Canoga Park, California 91303 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA 90501 ◊ Phone 800-419-4923 ◊ Fax 866-928-7418 September 6, 2017 Mr. Bart Buchalter Temecula Village Development, L.P. 7210 Jordan Avenue, Suite B7 Canoga Park, California 91303 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, California 92592 Partner Project No. 17-195274.1 Dear Mr. Buchalter: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (Phase I ESA) report of the abovementioned address (the “subject property”). This assessment was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in the ASTM Practice E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. This assessment included a site reconnaissance as well as research and interviews with representatives of the public, property ownership, site manager, and regulatory agencies. An assessment was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at (310) 615-4500 or ctaylor@partneresi.com. Sincerely, Cody Taylor Relationship Manager Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) and set forth by Temecula Village Development, L.P. for the property located at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (the “subject property”). The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Temecula Village Development, L.P. with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property. Property Description The subject property is located on the southern side of Rancho California Road and approximately 100 feet to the west of Comic Drive within a predominantly residential area of Riverside County. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property: Subject Property Data Address: None Historical Address: 30101 Rancho California Road (presumed based on a review of city directories) Property Use: Vacant Land Land Acreage (Ac): 22.83 Ac Number of Buildings: None Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN): 944370001, 944370005, 944370006, 944370007, 944370008, 944370010, 944370012, 944370013 Current Tenants: None Site Assessment Performed By: Kevin Bolland of Partner Site Assessment Conducted On: August 24, 2017 The subject property is currently vacant graded land improved with two cinderblock retaining walls on the southern-central portion of the property. No operations are currently performed onsite. According to available historical sources, the subject property was formerly undeveloped as early as 1901 until at least 1967; developed with horse stables from at least 1968 until at least 1989; and has remained undeveloped since at least 1996. Tenants on the subject property appear to have included Bob Rice Training Stables (1975); Mariana Farm (1980); and Walker Wilson (1990-1992). The immediately surrounding properties consist of the Portofino Apartments and a municipal supply well to the north across Rancho California Road; single-family residences to the south and east; and the Temecula Ridge Apartments to the west. According to information obtained from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) GeoTracker database for a nearby site (29750 Rancho California Road, Case No. T0606564546), groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 80 feet below ground surface (bgs) and flow toward the north-northwest. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page ii Findings A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of RECs during the course of this assessment. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of CRECs during the course of this assessment. A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of HRECs during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of environmental issues during the course of this assessment. Conclusions, Opinions, and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of the property located at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs or environmental issues in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends no further investigation of the subject property at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Limitations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 User Reliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Limiting Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description ......................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Current Property Use ...................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties .......................................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 6 2.4.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................. 6 2.4.3 Geology/Soils .......................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information ...................................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION ............................................................................................................ 8 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................................................ 8 3.2 Fire Insurance Maps ........................................................................................................................................................ 9 3.3 City Directories .................................................................................................................................................................. 9 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps ................................................................................................................................... 10 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW .................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Regulatory Agencies .................................................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 Health Department ............................................................................................................................................ 12 4.1.2 Fire Department .................................................................................................................................................. 12 4.1.3 Air Pollution Control Agency .......................................................................................................................... 12 4.1.4 Regional Water Quality Agency .................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control ................................................................................................. 13 4.1.6 Building Department ......................................................................................................................................... 13 4.1.7 Planning Department ........................................................................................................................................ 14 4.1.8 Oil & Gas Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 14 4.1.9 Assessor’s Office .................................................................................................................................................. 14 4.2 MAPPED DATABASE RECORDS SEARCH ...................................................................................... 15 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary ..................................................................................................................... 15 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings ................................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings .............................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings .................................................................................................................................. 16 4.2.5 Orphan Listings .................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS .................................................................. 17 5.1 Interviews ......................................................................................................................................................................... 18 5.1.1 Interview with Owner ........................................................................................................................................ 18 5.1.2 Interview with Report User .............................................................................................................................. 18 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager .................................................................................................................. 18 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page iv 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators, and Occupants ................................................................... 18 5.1.5 Interview with Others ........................................................................................................................................ 18 5.2 User Provided Information ........................................................................................................................................ 18 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs ......................................................................................... 18 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge ..................................................................................................................................... 18 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User ....................................................................................................................... 19 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ....................................................................................... 19 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .......................................................... 19 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation ....................................................................... 19 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ................................................................................................................. 20 6.1 General Site Characteristics ....................................................................................................................................... 20 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards............................................................................................................................ 21 6.3 Non-ASTM Services ...................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ..................................................................................................... 22 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) ..................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3.3 Radon ...................................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water ..................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3.5 Mold ......................................................................................................................................................................... 22 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance ........................................................................................................................ 23 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................... 24 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ............................................................... 25 9.0 REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................................... 26 Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Topographic Map Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Historical/Regulatory Documentation Appendix C Regulatory Database Report Appendix D Qualifications Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this ESA is to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-13) affecting the subject property that: 1) constitute or result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicable environmental law; 2) impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or require a material change in the use thereof; 3) require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4) may affect the value of the subject property; and 5) may require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1) evaluate its legal and financial liabilities for transactions related to foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing; 2) evaluate the subject property’s overall development potential, the associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property; and/or 3) determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing of the subject property. This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) liability (hereinafter, the “landowner liability protections,” or “LLPs”). ASTM Standard E1527-13 constitutes “all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice” as defined at 42 U.S.C. §9601(35)(B). 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527- 13. This assessment included: 1) a property and adjacent site reconnaissance; 2) interviews with key personnel; 3) a review of historical sources; 4) a review of regulatory agency records; and 5) a review of a regulatory database report provided by a third-party vendor. Partner contacted local agencies, such as environmental health departments, fire departments and building departments in order to determine any current and/or former hazardous substances usage, storage and/or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property. Additionally, Partner researched information on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) at these agencies. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 2 As defined by ASTM E1527-13, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: 1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the subject property; or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property. If requested by Client, this report may also include the identification, discussion of, and/or limited sampling of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), mold, and/or radon. 1.3 Limitations Partner warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the all appropriate inquiry provisions of the LLPs. Further, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property. Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA as defined by ASTM include the following: ACMs, LBP, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in Section 6.3. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 3 1.4 User Reliance Temecula Village Development, L.P. engaged Partner to perform this assessment in accordance with an agreement governing the nature, scope and purpose of the work as well as other matters critical to the engagement. All reports, both verbal and written, are for the sole use and benefit of Temecula Village Development, L.P. Either verbally or in writing, third parties may come into possession of this report or all or part of the information generated as a result of this work. In the absence of a written agreement with Partner granting such rights, no third parties shall have rights of recourse or recovery whatsoever under any course of action against Partner, its officers, employees, vendors, successors or assigns. Any such unauthorized user shall be responsible to protect, indemnify and hold Partner, Client and their respective officers, employees, vendors, successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses, liabilities, expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) and costs attributable to such Use. Unauthorized use of this report shall constitute acceptance of and commitment to these responsibilities, which shall be irrevocable and shall apply regardless of the cause of action or legal theory pled or asserted. Additional legal penalties may apply. This report has been completed under specific Terms and Conditions relating to scope, relying parties, limitations of liability, indemnification, dispute resolution, and other factors relevant to any reliance on this report. Any parties relying on this report do so having accepted the Terms and Conditions for which this report was completed. A copy of Partner’s standard Terms and Conditions can be found at http://www.partneresi.com/terms-and-conditions.php. 1.5 Limiting Conditions The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E1527-13. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below: • Partner was unable to determine the property use at 5-year intervals, which constitutes a data gap. Except for property tax files and recorded land title records, which were not considered to be sufficiently useful, Partner reviewed all standard historical sources and conducted appropriate interviews. • Partner submitted Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests to the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (RCDEH) for information pertaining to hazardous substances, underground storage tanks, releases, inspection records, etc. for the subject property. As of this writing, this agency has not responded to Partner’s request. Based on information obtained from other regulatory and historical sources, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment. • Interviews with past owners, operators, and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. Based on information obtained from other historical sources (as discussed in Section 3.0), this data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 4 • Partner requested information relative to deed restrictions and environmental liens, a title search, and completion of a pre-survey questionnaire from the Report User. This information was not provided at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 5 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description The subject property at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in Temecula, California is located on the southern side of Rancho California Road and approximately 100 feet to the west of Comic Drive. According to information obtained from the Riverside County Assessor, each of the eight (8) parcel numbers abbreviated legal descriptions are as follows: 944-370-001: .93 ACRES NET IN PAR 1 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-005: .75 ACRES NET IN PAR 5 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-006: .84 ACRES NET IN PAR 6 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-007: .99 ACRES NET IN PAR 7 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-008: 15.22 ACRES NET IN PAR 8 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-010: 1.74 ACRES M/L IN POR PAR 2 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-012: .60 ACRES M/L IN POR PAR 3 PM 216/080 PM 31023 944-370-013: 1.75 ACRES NET IN LOT 2, PM 216/080 PM 31023 According to records available through Chicago Title Advantage, ownership is currently vested in Mr. Bart Buchalter and the Temecula Village Development, L.P. since 2004. Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map, and Appendix A: Site Photographs for the location and site characteristics of the subject property. 2.2 Current Property Use The subject property is currently vacant graded land improved with two cinderblock retaining walls on the southern-central portion of the property. No operations are currently performed onsite. The subject property is designated for Planned Development by the City of Temecula. The subject property was not identified in the regulatory database report, discussed in Section 4.2. 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties The subject property is located within a predominantly residential area of Riverside County. During the vicinity reconnaissance, Partner observed the following land use on properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: Immediately Surrounding Properties North: Rancho California Road, beyond which are Portofino Apartments (30000 Rancho California Road) and Rancho California Water District Well #138 (30192 Rancho California Road) South: Single-family residences (30024-30110 Levande Place and 42471-2403 Carino Place) East: Single-family residences (42015-42089 Cosmic Drive, and 42751-42815 Twilight Court) West: Temecula Ridge Apartments (42450 Moraga Road) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 6 The adjacent property to the north was identified as a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Large Quantity Generator (LQG) site in the regulatory database report, as further discussed in Section 4.2. 2.4 Physical Setting Sources 2.4.1 Topography The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Murrieta, California Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic map was reviewed for this ESA. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, the subject property is located at approximately 1,120 to 1,200 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The contour lines in the area of the subject property indicate the area is sloping moderately toward the north- northwest. No improvements are depicted on the subject property on the 2012 topographic map. A copy of the topographic map is included as Figure 3 of this report. 2.4.2 Hydrology According to information obtained from the SWRCB GeoTracker database for a nearby site (29750 Rancho California Road, Case No. T0606564546), groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be approximately 80 feet bgs and flow toward the north-northwest. The nearest surface water in the vicinity of the subject property is The Temecula Duck Pond located approximately 1,400 feet to the southwest of the subject property. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands, or natural catch basins were observed at the subject property during this assessment. According to available information, a public water system operated by the Rancho California Water District (RCWD) serves the subject property vicinity. According to a representative of RCWD, shallow groundwater in the area is used moderately for irrigation and limited for municipal, industrial, and domestic uses. RCWD's water comes from a variety of natural sources which include precipitation, untreated import water recharge basins, and regional groundwater (aquifers). RCWD also purchases treated water from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. This agency imports water from Northern California and the Colorado River. A municipal water well operated by the RCWD is located adjacent to the north of the subject property (hydrologically down-gradient) across Rancho California Road. 2.4.3 Geology/Soils The subject property is situated within the Peninsular Ranges physiographic province of the State of California. This province is characterized by a series of ranges that are separated by longitudinal valleys, trending northwest to southeast, subparallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault. The trend of topography is similar to the Coast Ranges, but the geology is more like the Sierra Nevada, with granitic rock intruding the older metamorphic rocks. The Peninsular Ranges extend into Lower California and are bound on the east by the Colorado Desert. The Los Angeles Basin and the island group (Santa Catalina, Santa Barbara, and the distinctly terraced San Clemente and San Nicolas islands), together with the surrounding continental shelf (cut by deep submarine fault troughs) are included in this province. More specifically, the subject property is located approximately ¾-mile east of the Temecula Valley. The property is located in a hilly area on the southern edge of Long Canyon. The subject property rests upon Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 7 the sandstone member of the Pleistocene Pauba Formation. The sandstone member is a light-brown, moderately well indurated sandstone and siltstone facies. The Pauba Formation non-conformably overlies Cretaceous granodioritic rocks of the Paloma Valley Complex (California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1991, Geologic Map of the Santa Ana). 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information Partner performed a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. According to Community Panel Number 06065C2720G, dated August 28, 2008, the subject property appears to be located in Zone X, an area located outside of the 100-year and 500-year flood plains. A copy of the reviewed flood map is not included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 8 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below: Historical Use Information Period/Date Source Description/Use 1901-1967 Aerial Photographs, Topographic Maps Undeveloped 1968-1989 Aerial Photographs, City Directories, Topographic Maps Horse Stables 1996-Present Aerial Photographs, Topographic Maps, Interviews, Onsite Observations Vacant Graded Land Tenants on the subject property appear to have included Bob Rice Training Stables (1975); Mariana Farm (1980); and Walker Wilson (1990-1992). No potential environmental concerns were identified in association with the current or former use of the subject property. 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review Partner obtained available aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) on August 23, 2017. The following features were noted to be visible on the subject property and adjacent properties during the aerial photograph review: Date: 1938, 1949, 1953, 1961, 1967 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Appears to be undeveloped North: Appears to be undeveloped across a road South: Appears to be undeveloped East: Appears to be undeveloped West: Appears to be undeveloped Date: 1978 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Appears to be partially developed with horse stables within the northeastern portion, with the remainder undeveloped North: No significant changes visible South: Appears to be under construction with the current residential subdivision East: No significant changes visible apart from a horse track which appears to be related to the development on the subject property West: No significant changes visible Date: 1985, 1989 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: Appears to be vacant graded land across a road South: Appears to be developed with the current single-family residences East: Appears to be developed with the current single-family residences West: No significant changes visible Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 9 Date: 1996 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: The horse stable improvements previously noted on the subject property appear to have been removed, and an unimproved road appears to traverse the central portion of the property from east to west. North: No significant changes visible apart from the installation of a small structure to the northeast, resembling the current municipal well South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: No significant changes visible Date: 2005 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: Appears to be vacant graded land North: Appears to be developed with the current apartment complex South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: Appears to be under construction with the current apartment complex Date: 2006, 2009, 2010, 2012 Scale: 1”=500’ Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible East: No significant changes visible West: Appears to be developed with the current apartment complex Copies of reviewed aerial photographs are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.2 Fire Insurance Maps Partner contracted with EDR to provide Sanborn fire insurance maps for the subject property and surrounding area on August 22, 2017. Sanborn map coverage was not available. A copy of the EDR, Certified Sanborn Map Report is included in Appendix B of this report. 3.3 City Directories Partner reviewed historical city directories obtained from EDR on August 31, 2017 for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property and adjacent properties. City Directory Search for Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive (Subject Property) Year(s) Occupant Listed 1975 Bob Rice Training Stable (30101 Rancho California Road) 1980 KAS Training Stable (30101 Rancho California Road) 1985 Mariana Farm (30101 Rancho California Road) 1990 Walker D, Wilson Walker (30101 Rancho California Road) 1992 Wilson Walker (30101 Rancho California Road) 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, 2014 No Listings Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 10 Based on the city directory review, no environmentally sensitive listings were identified for the subject property. City Directory Search for Adjacent Properties Year(s) Occupant Listed 1975 No Listings 1980 No Listings 1985 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), No Listings (Rancho California Road) 1990 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), No Listings (Rancho California Road) 1992 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), No Listings (Rancho California Road) 1995 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), No Listings (Rancho California Road) 2000 Single-family Residential Listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), Portofino Apartments (30000 Rancho California Road) 2005 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), Portofino Apartments (29980-30090 Rancho California Road) 2010 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), Portofino Apartments (29980-30090 Rancho California Road), Not Included in City Directory Research (Moraga Road) 2014 Single-family residential listings (Cosmic Drive), Not Included in City Directory Research (Levande Place, Carino Place), Portofino Apartments (29980-30090 Rancho California Road), Not Included in City Directory Research (Moraga Road) * XXXX= A phone number is present but is not registered to a tenant or is disconnected. Based on the city directory review, no environmentally sensitive listings were identified for the adjacent property addresses. Copies of reviewed city directories are included in Appendix B of this report. 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps Partner reviewed historical topographic maps obtained from EDR on August 22, 2017. The following features were noted to be depicted on the subject property and adjacent properties during the topographic map review: Date: 1901, 1942, 1943, 1947, 1950, 1953 Subject Property: Depicted as undeveloped land North: Depicted as undeveloped land across a road South: Depicted as undeveloped land East: Depicted as undeveloped land West: Depicted as undeveloped land Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 11 Date: 1973 Subject Property: Depicted as developed with five structures North: Depicted as undeveloped land across Long Valley Road South: Depicted as undeveloped land East: Depicted as undeveloped land West: Depicted as undeveloped land Date: 1979 Subject Property: No significant changes depicted North: No significant changes depicted South: Appears to be developed with multiple roads East: No significant changes depicted West: No significant changes depicted Copies of reviewed topographic maps are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 12 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Regulatory Agencies 4.1.1 Health Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Riverside County Department of Environmental Health (RCDEH) Point of Contact: Public Information Officer Agency Address: 4065 County Circle Drive, RM 104, Riverside, CA 92513-7489 Agency Phone Number: (951) 358-5055 Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Faxed Request Summary of Communication: As of the date of this writing, Partner has not received a response from the RCDEH for inclusion in this report. Based on information obtained from other sources, this data gap is not expected to alter the conclusions of this report. 4.1.2 Fire Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Temecula Department of Fire Prevention (SDFD) Point of Contact: City Clerk Records Request Agency Address: 1010 2nd Avenue, Suite 400, Temecula, CA 92101 Agency Phone Number: (619) 533-4300 Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Faxed Request Summary of Communication: According to the City Clerk of Temecula, The Department of Fire Prevention has no records related to the subject property. 4.1.3 Air Pollution Control Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Point of Contact: Facility Information Detail Database (FINDS) Agency Address: http://www3.aqmd.gov/webappl/fim/prog/search.aspx Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Database Summary of Communication: No Permits to Operate (PTO), Notices of Violation (NOV), or Notices to Comply (NTC); or the presence of AULs, dry cleaning machines, or USTs were on file for the subject property with the AQMD FINDS. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 13 4.1.4 Regional Water Quality Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) – Santa Ana Region Point of Contact: GeoTracker Database Agency Address: http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/ Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Database Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage, or releases; or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the RWQCB. 4.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Point of Contact: Hazardous Waste Tracking System (HWTS) and EnviroStor Databases Agency Address: http://hwts.dtsc.ca.gov/report_search.cfm?id=5 http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/ Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Databases Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage, or releases; or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the DTSC. 4.1.6 Building Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Temecula Building & Safety Department (B&SD), Riverside County Property Information Management System (PIMS), Riverside County Department of Transportation and Land Management Point of Contact: City Clerk Records Request, Online Databases Agency Address: 41000 Main Street, Temecula, CA 92590 Agency Phone Number: (951) 240-4202 Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Faxed Freedom of Information Request, Online Records Review Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is represented by a total of eight separate parcels. The City of Temecula provided one building permit and two letters of correspondence indicating a business by the name of Imocal authorized the demolition of three (3) barns, corrals, and fencing between February and March of 1992. No other building permits pertaining to development or construction on the property were available for review with the County of Riverside or the City of Temecula. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 14 4.1.7 Planning Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Temecula Planning Department (SDPD) Point of Contact: Online Zoning Map Agency Address: https://temeculaca.gov/340/Zoning Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Zoning Map Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is zoned PDO- 5 for Planned Development Overlay by the City of Temecula. 4.1.8 Oil & Gas Exploration Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) Point of Contact: Well Finder Database Agency Address: http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/doms/doms-app.html Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Review Summary of Communication: Partner reviewed oil, gas, and geothermal field maps maintained by DOGGR to identify any existing or former oil wells on the subject property and/or the surrounding area. No wells were identified on or near the subject property. 4.1.9 Assessor’s Office Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Riverside County Assessor’s Office Point of Contact: Online Property Search Database Agency Address: 40935 County Center Dr., Temecula, CA Agency Phone Number: (951) 600-6200 Date of Contact: August 21, 2017 Method of Communication: Online Review Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is identified by APNs 944370001, 944370005, 944370006, 944370007, 944370008, 944370010, 944370012, and 944370013, which measure a total of 22.83 acres. Copies of pertinent documents obtained from the aforementioned regulatory agencies, if available, are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 15 4.2 Mapped Database Records Search Information from standard federal, state, county, and city environmental record sources was provided by EDR. Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The information contained in this report was compiled from publicly available sources and the locations of the sites are plotted utilizing a geographic information system, which geocodes the site addresses. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Using the ASTM definition of migration, Partner considers the migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form onto the subject property during the evaluation of each site listed on the radius report, which includes solid, liquid, and vapor. 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary Radius Report Data Database Search Radius (mile) Subject Property Adjacent Properties Sites of Concern Federal NPL or Delisted NPL Site 1.00 No No No Federal CERCLIS Site 0.50 No No No Federal CERCLIS-NFRAP Site 0.50 No No No Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facility 1.00 No No No Federal RCRA TSDF Facility 0.50 No No No Federal RCRA Generators Site 0.25 No Yes N/A Federal IC/EC Registries 0.50 No No No Federal ERNS Site Subject Property No N/A N/A State/Tribal Equivalent NPL 1.00 No No No State/Tribal Equivalent CERCLIS 1.00 No No No State/Tribal Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Site 0.50 No No No State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Site 0.50 No No No State/Tribal Registered Storage Tank Sites 0.25 No No N/A State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites (VCP) 0.50 No No No State/Tribal Spills 0.50 No No No Federal Brownfield Sites 0.50 No No No State Brownfield Sites 0.50 No No No Miscellaneous Databases Varies No No No EDR MGP 1.00 No No No EDR Hist Auto 0.125 No No N/A EDR Hist Cleaner 0.125 No No N/A 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings The subject property is not identified in the regulatory database report. 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings The adjacent property to the northeast, across Rancho California Road, is identified as a RCRA-LQG site, as discussed below: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 16 • The property, identified as Rancho California Water District Well No. 138 at 30192 Rancho California Road is permitted through the EPA as a large quantity generator of corrosive waste. No RCRA violations are reported in the database. Mr. Michael M. Calvert is identified as the responsible contact pertaining to this listing. This site is not listed on databases indicative of a release of hazardous substances, and no releases pertaining to contamination identified in the well were identified. Based on the regulatory oversight, the absence of documented violations or releases, and inferred direction of groundwater flow, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Based on the findings, vapor migration from the adjacent properties is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings No sites of concern are identified in the regulatory database report. Based on various mitigating factors including relative distance from the subject property, inferred direction of groundwater flow, media affected, and/or regulatory status, the remaining listed sites within the specified search radius of the subject property which appeared on local, State, or Federally published lists of sites that have had releases of hazardous substances, are not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Based on the findings, vapor migration from the surrounding properties is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.5 Orphan Listings No orphan listings are identified in the regulatory database report. A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix C of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 17 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the User must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31. The User should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiries is not complete. The User is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following: • Review Title and Judicial Records for Environmental Liens and AULs • Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User • Actual Knowledge of the User • Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price • Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable information • Degree of Obviousness • Reason for Preparation of this Phase I ESA Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. Partner requested our Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, Partner requested the following site information from Temecula Village Development, L.P. (User of this report). User Responsibilities Item Provided By User Not Provided By User Discussed Below Does Not Apply Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs X Specialized Knowledge X Actual Knowledge X Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues X Identification of Key Site Manager Section 5.1.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA Section 1.1 Prior Environmental Reports X Other X Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 18 5.1 Interviews 5.1.1 Interview with Owner Mr. Bart Buchalter, subject property owner, was not aware of any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; or any notices from a governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. According to Mr. Buchalter, the subject property was undeveloped prior to his ownership. Mr. Buchalter was not aware of any structures, utilities, underground features, monitoring wells, or any hazardous substances on the subject property. In addition, Mr. Buchalter indicated that the only activities on the subject property since the acquisition of the property have included the installation of a city owned electrical easement and grading pertaining to the planned construction of the Temecula Village Improvement project. No other pertinent information regarding the subject property was provided by Mr. Buchalter. 5.1.2 Interview with Report User Please refer to Sections 5.1.1 and 5.2 for information requested from the Report User. 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager Mr. Buchalter was identified as the key site manager. 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators, and Occupants Interviews with past owners, operators, and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. 5.1.5 Interview with Others As the subject property is not an abandoned property as defined in ASTM 1527-13, interview with others were not performed. 5.2 User Provided Information 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs Partner was not provided with title records or environmental lien and AUL information for review as part of this assessment. 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 19 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User No actual knowledge of any environmental lien or AULs encumbering the subject property or in connection with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No knowledge of valuation reductions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Refer to Section 5.1.1 for a discussion of commonly known or reasonably ascertainable information within the local community about the subject property. 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation No previous reports or other pertinent documentation was provided to Partner for review during the course of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 20 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The weather at the time of the site reconnaissance was sunny and clear. Refer to Section 1.5 for limitations encountered during the site reconnaissance and Sections 2.1 and 2.2 for subject property operations. The table below provides the site assessment details: Site Assessment Data Site Assessment Performed By: Kevin Bolland Site Assessment Conducted On: August 24, 2017 Partner was unaccompanied during the site reconnaissance. Partner interviewed the subject property owner, Mr. Bart Buchalter, and was provided with a completed environmental questionnaire regarding the history of the subject property as discussed in Section 5.1.1. 6.1 General Site Characteristics 6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste is not currently generated at the subject property. No evidence of illegal dumping of solid waste was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.1.2 Sewage Discharge and Disposal No sanitary sewer discharges are currently associated with the subject property. No wastewater treatment facilities or septic systems were observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.3 Surface Water Drainage Storm water on the subject property is directed to erosion channels and directed to the public right-of- way on Rancho California Road. No drains or engineered storm water management systems are present on the subject property at this time. The subject property does not appear to be a designated wetland area, based on information obtained from the United States Fish and Wildlife Service; however, a comprehensive wetlands survey would be required in order to formally determine actual wetlands on the subject property. No surface impoundments, wetlands, natural catch basins, settling ponds, or lagoons are located on the subject property. No drywells were identified on the subject property. 6.1.4 Source of Heating and Cooling No heating or cooling equipment was observed on the subject property. 6.1.5 Wells and Cisterns No aboveground evidence of wells or cisterns was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.1.6 Wastewater Domestic wastewater is not currently generated at the subject property. No industrial process is currently performed at the subject property. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 21 6.1.7 Septic Systems No septic systems were observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.8 Additional Site Observations No additional general site characteristics were observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards 6.2.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site No hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) No evidence of current or former ASTs or USTs was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.3 Evidence of Releases No spills, stains, or other indications that a surficial release has occurred at the subject property were observed. 6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) No potential PCB-containing equipment (transformers, oil-filled switches, hoists, lifts, dock levelers, hydraulic elevators, etc.) was observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.5 Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors No strong, pungent, or noxious odors were evident during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.6 Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.7 Drains, Sumps, and Clarifiers No drains, sumps, or clarifiers were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.8 Pits, Ponds, and Lagoons No pits, ponds, or lagoons were observed on the subject property. 6.2.9 Stressed Vegetation No stressed vegetation was observed on the subject property. 6.2.10 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards No additional environmental hazards, including landfill activities or radiological hazards, were observed. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 22 6.3 Non-ASTM Services 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Due to the undeveloped nature of the subject property, ACMs were not considered within the scope of this assessment. 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Due to the undeveloped nature of the subject property, LBP was not considered within the scope of this assessment. 6.3.3 Radon Radon is a colorless, odorless, naturally occurring, radioactive, inert, gaseous element formed by radioactive decay of radium (Ra) atoms. The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones, according to the table below: EPA Radon Zones EPA Zones Average Predicted Radon Levels Potential Zone 1 Exceed 4.0 pCi/L Highest Zone 2 Between 2.0 and 4.0 pCi/L Moderate Zone 3 Less than 2.0 pCi/L Low It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the US EPA recommends site-specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Radon sampling was not conducted as part of this assessment. Review of the US EPA Map of Radon Zones places the subject property in Zone 2. Based upon the radon zone classification, radon is not considered to be a significant environmental concern. 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water According to available information, a public water system operated by the Temecula Department of Public Works and Engineering serves the subject property vicinity. According to the Consumer Confidence Report (CCR) published by the City of Temecula in 2015, water supplied to the properties in the vicinity of subject property is in compliance with applicable State and Federal regulations pertaining to drinking water standards, including lead and copper. Water sampling was not conducted to verify water quality. 6.3.5 Mold Molds are microscopic organisms found virtually everywhere, indoors and outdoors. Mold will grow and multiply under the right conditions, needing only sufficient moisture (e.g.in the form of very high humidity, condensation, or water from a leaking pipe, etc.) and organic material (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, paper, or natural fiber carpet padding). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 23 Due to the undeveloped nature of the subject property, mold was not considered with the scope of this assessment. 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance The adjacent property reconnaissance consisted of observing the adjacent properties from the subject property premises. No items of environmental concern were identified on the adjacent properties during the site assessment, including hazardous substances, petroleum products, ASTs, USTs, evidence of releases, PCBs, strong or noxious odors, pools of liquids, sumps or clarifiers, pits or lagoons, stressed vegetation, or any other potential environmental hazards. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 24 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Findings A REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of RECs during the course of this assessment. A CREC refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of CRECs during the course of this assessment. A HREC refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of HRECs during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: • Partner did not identify evidence of environmental issues during the course of this assessment. Conclusions, Opinions, and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of the property located at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California (the “subject property”). Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs or environmental issues in connection with the subject property. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends no further investigation of the subject property at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 25 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property located at Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, Riverside County, California in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report. By signing below, Partner declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR §312. Partner has the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. Partner has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Prepared By: Kevin Bolland Environmental Scientist Reviewed By: Joel Redding Environmental Professional Senior Author Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 17-195274.1 September 6, 2017 Page 26 9.0 REFERENCES Reference Documents American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13. California State Department of Conservation – Division of Oil, Gas & Geothermal Resources Well Finder (DOGGR), accessed via the Internet, August and August 2017 California State Department of Toxic Substances Control – EnviroStor, accessed via the Internet, August and August 2017 California State Department of Toxic Substances Control – Hazardous Waste Tracking System, accessed via the Internet, August and August 2017 California State Water Resources Control Board – GeoTracker, accessed via the Internet, August and August 2017 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Certified Sanborn Map Report, August and August 2017 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Report, August and August 2017 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), The EDR City Directory Abstract, August and August 2017 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), The EDR Historical Topographic Map Report, August and August 2017 Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR), Radius Map Report, August and August 2017 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via the internet, August 2017 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via the internet, August 2017 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, accessed via the internet, August 2017 United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Map of Radon Zones (Document EPA-402-R-93-071), accessed via the internet, August 2017 United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet, August 2017 United States Geological Survey Topographic Map, 7.5 minute series, accessed via the internet, August 2017 FIGURES 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2 SITE PLAN 3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 1: SITE LOCATION MAP Project No. 17-195274.1 Drawing Not To Scale KEY: Subject Property FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN Project No. 17-195274.1 KEY: Subject Property GROUNDWATER FLOW LEVANDE PLACE Temecula Ridge Apartments 42450 Moraga Road Portofino Apartments 30000 Rancho California Road Rancho California Water District Well #138 30192 Rancho California Road FIGURE 3: TOPOGRAPHIC MAP Project No. 17-195274.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Murietta, California Quadrangle Created: 2012 KEY: Subject Property APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS 1. Overview of the western side of the subject property as seen from the southern side. 3. Overview of the northern portion of the subject property as seen from the eastern side. 5. View of the southwestern corner of the subject property. 2. Overview of the eastern side of the subject property as seen from the southern side. 4. View of the northwestern portion of the subject property as seen from the northern side. 6. View of the southeastern portion of the subject property as seen from the southern side. Appendix A: Site Photo- Project No. 17-195274.1 7. View of engineered stormwater drainage on the southern side of the subject property. 9. View of sandbags containing rocks on the cen-tral portion of the subject property. 11. View of an engineered erosion prevention best management practice installment on the northern-central portion of the lots. 8. View of a cinderblock retaining wall on the southern side of the subject property. 10. Additional view of the debris on the central portion of the subject property. 12. Additional view of the stormwater manage-ment installment on the central portion of the property. Appendix A: Site Photo- Project No. 17-195274.1 13. View of a large erosion channel on the south-eastern side of the subject property. 15. View of the fence-line on the eastern side of the subject property. 17. View of the fence-line on the western side of the subject property. 14. View of a goat (likely related to the adjacent resi-dence) on the eastern side of the subject property. 16. View of the fence-line on the northern side of the subject property. 18. View of the fence-line on the southern portion of the subject property. Appendix A: Site Photo- Project No. 17-195274.1 19. View of an adjacent single-family neighbor-hood to the south of the subject property. 21. View of the adjacent single-family neighbor-hood to the east of the subject property. 23. View of the entrance to the adjacent town-home community to the west of the subject prop-erty. 20. Additional view of an adjacent single-family neighborhood south of the subject property 22. View of the entrance to the adjacent multi-family apartment complex to the north. 24. View of typical townhomes located to the west of the subject property. Appendix A: Site Photo- Project No. 17-195274.1 APPENDIX B: HISTORICAL/REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 August 23, 2017 5028780.9 Contact:EDR Inquiry # Search Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Year Details SourceScale EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Site Name: Client Name: 1938 1"=500'Flight Date: June 14, 1938 USDA 1949 1"=500'Flight Date: May 23, 1949 USDA 1953 1"=500'Flight Date: August 28, 1953 USDA 1961 1"=500'Flight Date: June 17, 1961 USDA 1967 1"=500'Flight Date: July 15, 1967 USDA 1978 1"=500'Flight Date: September 20, 1978 USDA 1985 1"=500'Flight Date: July 28, 1985 USDA 1989 1"=500'Flight Date: August 15, 1989 USDA 1996 1"=500'Flight Date: January 01, 1996 USGS 2002 1"=500'Acquisition Date: May 22, 2002 USGS/DOQQ 2005 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2006 1"=500'Flight Year: 2006 USDA/NAIP 2009 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2010 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2012 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 08/23/17 Vacant Land Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92592 Torrance, CA 90501-0000 5028780.9 Colleen Tubridy This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5028780 9 2 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1938 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 2 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1949 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 3 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1953 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 4 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1961 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 5 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1967 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 6 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1978 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 7 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1985 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 8 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1989 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 9 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 1996 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 10 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2002 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 11 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2005 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 12 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2006 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 13 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2009 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 14 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2010 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 15 17-195274.1 page- APPENDIX B: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS Project No. Key: Subject Property Aerial Photograph Year: 2012 0 Feet 500 1000 2000 5028780 9 16 17-195274.1 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 August 22, 2017 5028780.3 Certified Sanborn® Map Report Certified Sanborn Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results Contact:EDR Inquiry # Site Name: Client Name: Certification # PO # Project 08/22/17 Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Vacant Land Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. 2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92592 5028780.3 Torrance, CA 90501-0000 Colleen Tubridy The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. 1512-4C08-835B NA UNMAPPED PROPERTY 17-195274.1 This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Certification #: 1512-4C08-835B Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5028780 3 2 Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 Inquiry Number: 5028780.5 August 31, 2017 The EDR-City Directory Image Report 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Report is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Report includes a search of available city directory data at 5 year intervals. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. A check mark indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Year Target Street Cross Street Source 2014 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2010 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2005 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 2000 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1995 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1992 þ ¨EDR Digital Archive 1990 þ ¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 þ ¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 þ ¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1975 þ ¨Haines Criss-Cross Directory RECORD SOURCES EDR is licensed to reproduce certain City Directory works by the copyright holders of those works. The purchaser of this EDR City Directory Report may include it in report(s) delivered to a customer. Reproduction of City Directories without permission of the publisher or licensed vendor may be a violation of copyright. 5028780-5 Page 1 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY STREET Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 Year CD Image Source COSMIC DR 2014 pg A1 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A7 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A13 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A19 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A21 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg A23 EDR Digital Archive 1990 pg A25 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg A27 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source 1975 -Haines Criss-Cross Directory Street not listed in Source RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD 2014 pg A2 EDR Digital Archive 2010 pg A8 EDR Digital Archive 2005 pg A14 EDR Digital Archive 2000 pg A20 EDR Digital Archive 1995 pg A22 EDR Digital Archive 1992 pg A24 EDR Digital Archive 1990 pg A26 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1985 pg A28 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1980 pg A29 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 1975 pg A30 Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780-5 Page 2 FINDINGS CROSS STREETS No Cross Streets Identified 5028780-5 Page 3 City Directory Images - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A1 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 42015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42029 TESSENDORF, DELORES 42045 SAENZ, FRANK F 42050 PATINO, RICHARD A 42059 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42071 MATUS, PAUL 42080 ALCANTAR, PATRICIA 42089 ARROYO, GILBERT A 42106 VAN, RICHARD A 42120 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42134 HENRY, MICHELLE A 42148 PEREZ, BRYAN S 42162 AVILA, FRUCTOSO F 42176 CANDYS TREE SERVICE MCCANN, KEITH L 42188 LITTRELL, WAYNE L 42200 NEWBY, RYAN C 42201 POTEET, MICHAEL A 42214 NIELSEN, JASON A 42259 HORIZON WINDOW CLEANING 42295 J C TUCKMAR INC 42327 D J MECHANICAL - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A2 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 29980 ANDERSON, RANDY L EVANS, KERRI J HERNANDEZ, EDWARD D JANICKEY, VERONICA JANSON & ASSO GLOBAL CNSLTG LEGARE, KATIE MCHENRY, SEAN P POPLIN, RICHARD L ROMAN, MARY C ROSUCK, ROBYN L SCHILTZ, MARIA SEIDENBERG, MARK R SMITH, BRADLEY R STEINER, MICHELLE P TYSON, KELLY VINGRES, LENORD WEISMANN, ARTHUR WILDING, DANIELLE M 29990 ABUNDIS, GUADALUPE ASEF, WALI CARLSON ERIC DIAZ, ANTHONY EMMONS, NICK A ESOY, VITO P FLORES, SERGIO KELLER, JON M KIM, JOOSUN MARKS, KRISTINA OCANA, VICTORIA O SAUCEDO, MIRELLA SIMMONS, JOSH SMITH, LUKE SMITH, ROBERT THURMOND, JASON UMALI, CLEMENTE M WALI, ASEF 30000 PORTOFINO APARTMENTS SITTER, RENAE 30010 BARAZONE, LESLI BARNES, DAVID BROWN, GERALEEN GE, JUN LANGFELDER, CHRISTOPHER F LEES, NICHOLE A MENDEZ, ANNA PETERSON, P SHARP LOGISTICS INC 30020 CURRY, JESICA A FELIX, LETY GODINEZ, IGNACIO (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A3 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 30020 KHACHADOORIAN, PATRICIA LANCASTER, LINDA S LOWE, HARRISON W MACIAS, CLARA MACREADY, SEAN M MARSHALL, LORETTA E PHARIS, MALLORY PHOMMYSOUK, SAMIENE QUINN, PATRICK D ROMAINE, ANDREW SMITH, PATRICIA VALENZUELA, BEATRIZ ZAVALA, NORALISA 30030 BAXTER, BRANDON BERNHARDT, ROBERT E CREW RATES DESHAZO, DEMETRIUS GOAD, ARTHUR D GRAAFF, VICTORIA HAZEN, EDDIE ROBERTSON, CHRIS TABOR, TIMOTHY J WILSON, RONALD YAMANE, REID 30040 DALUPAN, JOHN DAMATO, TARA L GUANZON, ALEN MARSICANO, MICHAEL NATHAN, KATRINA NGUYEN, THAI SANCHEZ, ROBERTO K SEQUEIRA, LINDA TELLO, NORMA 30050 BARO, NORA R HOWARD, FERWANNI JONES, JOYCE LUTZ, JOSHUA MANZANO, FELIX MARINA HILLS APPRAISAL MARTINEZ, JOSE L MCKNIGHT MOTOR LOGISTICS PUNO, RESTITUTO C 30060 ARCHULETA, EVA S BACON, BARRY E BARRETT, JONATHAN BREUER, AARON DUNCAN, KEMAR HARTMANN, ALANA HILL, STEPHANIE M HILLS, STEPHANIE (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A4 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 30060 LARA, CARLOS MARK, WILLIAM MONTES, FRANCISCO A PATEL, MEHULKUMAR S PERKINS, AMANDA PFAU, ROBERTA WALKER, C ZARDILLA, JEANNE 30070 ALFARO, RICARDO BASSETT, NILSA BECKER, AUSTIN DROKE, DAVID GLOW ON GO MOBILE TANNING GORDON, GEORGE G HANRAHAN, BRIAN HERBIN, BRIAN K OBREGON, JESUS PAGE, D PITT, NATALIE RIGHT BROTHERS WINDOW CLEANING ROBLES, ELIZABETH ROSS, DONALD SAFAVERDI, KATHY TORRES, M WEILER, JESSICA 30080 ANDERSON, RICHARD APONTE, JUAN DORIN, TIFFANY ELIDIO, HIGINIO GARCIA, FAITH HIGINIO, CHRISTINA N JOHNSON, SHANE R RUVALCABA, HUGO ZAZULA, SHANE 30090 ANUJ INVESTMENTS INC COOKS, MICHAEL L SMITH, COLIN J YETT, JENNIFER L 30520 AEROSCORE INC ALLIED GLOBAL RESOURCES LLC ANYTIME FITNESS TEMECULA CLOOT, MARVIN DOANE PHIL ELWOOD MICHELE R EWING, JAMES L FEATHER DOOR & GATE COMPANY GOT CURBS GRANIC, ERIKA GUSTAFSON, JAMES HUDMAN, ANGELIQUE N (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A5 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 30520 INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS JOHNSON ROBIN ATTORNEY LIBAULT ROBERT LIBAULT, ROBERT R M & M HEATING AIR COND/REFRIG MARVEL, DEBORAH A MATURE MINDS COLLECTIVE MEDINA, AARON MENDOZA, JOSE MGI PROPERTIES LLC MURPHY, SHANNON NAMI-TEMECULA VALLEY NEWAVE SOLUTIONS LLC NOELL LOUIS ALEX ONE TO ONE INC OSTAPECK GRANT PARKER, MICHAELA PETERSON BRAD POSTAL ANNEX PREFERRED HOME CARE PULIDO, ARMANDO RCS PUBLISHING INC RHODES, DYSON RICKETYROO INC RITEWAY BUILDING SERVICES LLC ROSADO, JULIO A SEASIDE MARKETING LLC SEMPER CONSULTING LLC SERGIO MARQUEZ DISCOVERY SA STAR LIMOS SOUTHERN LLC STEVENS, PATSY T REPS INC TEAHEN GROUP TEMECULA VALLEY PONY COLT LEAG TEMEKU GRILL INC TITANIUM EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS TREAT, MARK VEASEY, KENNETH VENTURE WORKS INC WOOD SOURCE WRIGHT, BRIAN A YOUNG, NATALIE 30530 ALBERTSONS LLC EXPRESSCARE TEMECULA NEW ALBERTSONS INC SAVE ON PHARMACY 30534 BURGER KING 30550 NAILS NOW PAMS DONUTS NO 8 ROBERT WYSONG HAIR DESIGN (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A6 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2014 30570 CYCOPATH INC MY GYM TEMECULA PETCO ANIMAL SUPS STORES INC 30580 MCDONALDS 30590 CB DOLLAR ZONE LLC COACHMANS INN SPT BISTRO LLC FERGUSON MIKE GLENCOE PIZZA SERVICES LLC PAINE, TERREL E STEWS BARBER SHOP - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A7 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 42015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42029 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42045 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42050 PATINO, RICHARD A 42059 CALABRESE, GIOVANNI 42071 MATUS, PETER P 42080 LOPEZ, ARTEMIO 42089 ARROYO, GILBERT A 42106 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42120 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42134 LOOMANS, TIM J 42148 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42162 MIYAHIRA, CRAIG T 42176 CANDYS TREE SERVICE MCCANN, KEITH L 42188 LITTRELL, WAYNE L 42200 NEWBY, JON 42201 PREWITT, MICHAEL A 42214 AZEVEDO, JOHNNY F ELOHI WELLNESS 42259 HORIZON WINDOW CLEANING 42295 J C TUCKMAR INC JCVOLK INVESTMENTS INC 42327 D J MECHANICAL - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A8 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 29980 BOURNE, RAQUEL DALUPAN, EDWIN EARHART, JAMES FRIEDMAN, COLIN HAUCK, MICHAIAH HOLDREN, GRACE JOHNSON, RICHARD NOOR, SEDIG SIMPSON, ANDREW THOMPSON, LORI A VESPER, N VINGRES, LENORD ZETT, JANELLE M 29990 ALAJIAN, ARMEN A ALARCON, MIREYA AZIMI, MAHSHID BARKSDALE, RECHELLE BRIZENBINE, E DANBURY, MICHAEL L DAVIS, EATHON GILPIN, THOMAS B GURULE, JASON L KELLER, JON M MALANAY, JESUS P MCCRAY, DANNY MCLEOD, BRYON C NUNEZ, RODEN H PENID, MARIA E SAGASTUME, PERLA SMITH, CLYDE J STOVER, SHAWN 30000 BARBER, JAMIE CRESCENT HEIGHTS PORTOFINO APARTMENTS SHOUP, HAYLEY 30010 ACEVEDO, IRMA DENNIS, CELON D DIOL, AARON KLAS, LEROY MENDOZA, ANTONIO L SHARP LOGISTICS INC TRAN, BA 30020 AWASTI, SUNIL ERICKSON, OLGA F KIM, KEVIN LACROIX, DONALD LANCASTER, LINDA S LINDSAY, JACKIE MACIEL, SERGIO MACKINNON, MALCOLM Y (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A9 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 30020 MALABRIGO, GLENN MARSHALL, LORETTA E MOHAMMED, MUSTAFA PATEL, RAVINDRA REYNA, LAURA ROMAINE, AMBER SAMUELS, VICKI THOMAS, LYN TRUJILLO, JUSTA VIGO, NORMA P ZAMORA, LEONCIO M 30030 ALVAREZ, JENNIFER L BASYE, JENNIFER BAXTER, BRANDON CREW RATES DALESSANDRO, FRANK DECKER, KEVIN L DESHAZO, DEMETRIUS GARCIA, BETSY GUESS, JESTEEN E HULTMAN, NICHOLAS MOTTO, JESSICA OLALIA, JAMES ROBERTSON, CHRIS TOPACIO, EDGARDO P 30040 ACEDO, MARIBETH ANGELES, ANGELA DAMATO, TARA L GROUNDWATER, JAMES T LEJANO, ROMULO J LUGO, JAIME B NGUYEN, THAI NOWAK, TRACY M RAMIREZ, PHILLIP F RITZ, MANUEL SANCHEZ, ROBERT K SEQUEIRA, LINDA STANDARD FLOOR CLEANING VANDERSCHANS, CHRISTINA WAVEREP 30050 CLAYTON, JAMES W DAY, JONATHAN E GOTTSCHALK, KARL JONES, JOYCE MCGOWAN, ANTHONY MCKNIGHT MOTOR LOGISTICS OLI, I C PUIG, SAMANTHA RAMIREZ, MANUEL D SCHULZE, DAVID (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A10 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 30050 SMITH, ROSE 30060 COCA, MERILI T CONNOLLY, J DEATON, JESSICA DEVILLIERS, GEORGE GONZALES, JOSH GROSS, THEODORE HEBERT, BRIAN KERR, TODD M MENDOZA, THEREZA NGUYEN, TIEN T ORTIZ, JOSE L PETKOV, NIKOLA ROGERS, KENNETH E RUSSO, BRIAN J SMITH, VINCENT A THOMASON, CHARLES B WASHINGTON, ANTHONY 30070 BALTIERRA, CINDY M CORONA, GLORIA DESIDERIO, MARITA DOWD, CASSANDRA HERBIN, BRIAN K JUSTUS, MICHELLE A LARY, TYLER MORGAN, DENNIS MORTIMER, MASON G PINA, JOSE G PRICE, CHRIS L ROBBINS, JOHN RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER RONDOU, MICHAEL J SAFAVERDI, KATHY SAMPSON, KATHLEEN S WALTON, M WELLS, MEGAN E WINTERBOTTOM, SHANDA F 30080 CHERRY, ROBERT L CRUISING TEAM DIVEN, CHRIS ESCALANTE, ARMANDO K MEISTER, CODY MILLER, NATHAN PEJAR, A VICARI, HEIDI 30090 ANUJ INVESTMENTS INC BYER, JOSH CLAPP, JACOB M CUSTODIO, GERTRUDES HILDEN, BRIAN M (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A11 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 30090 JEWELL, BRANDON KOCHANEK, EDWARD J LOFFA, ELIZABETH MAGGS, MICHAEL A NORDSTROM, LESLIE TALAVERA, LONNIE A 30520 A V P HOLDINGS INC ATOM ELECTRICAL SERVICE AUDIOVISION SPECIALISTS LLC BAKER, MICHAEL A BEYER HEATHCARE BROWN, MARIANNE CABINET OUTFITTERS INC CARPINELLIS TV PROMOTIONS COAST VALLEY CLAIM SERVICE COLESCO BUILDERS INC COLONIAL PAINTING CONTRACTORS DCM GROUP INC ELWOOD MICHELE R EWING, JAMES L FEATHER DOOR & GATE COMPANY GOT CURBS GUSTAFSON, JAMES HIGH FLYER MARKETING INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL SYSTEMS INTELLIPRODUCTS LLC JOHNSON ROBIN ATTORNEY JUSTIN P AMES KATIES VILLAGE CLEANERS LAVELL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION LIBAULT ROBERT LIBAULT, ROBERT R LONE STAR RACING LLC MARQUEZ, SERGIO MATCO PET CENTER MATURE MINDS COLLECTIVE MIA CRISTINA INC MICHAEL STAN MUNK KIMBERLY NEWAVE SOLUTIONS LLC NOELL LOUIS ALEX ONE TO ONE INC OSTAPECK GRANT PACIFIC ACHIEVEMENT INC PELAEZ, MARC PEONY POSTAL ANNEX PRECISE INTERIORS PROBE UNLIMITED INC PROFESSIONAL DISPLAYS AND DIRE (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A12 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2010 30520 PROP MASTER PRODUCTIONS INC PULKOWNIK, APRIL QUEENS CASTLE ENTERPRISES LLC RAMIREZ, MARIANA RCS PUBLISHING INC RHODES, DYSON RICKETYROO INC SEMPER CONSULTING LLC SERGIO MARQUEZ DISCOVERY SA SINGINGCOYOTE LLC STAR LIMOUSINE SOUTHERN LLC STONEBRIDGE REALTY INC STRATEGIC CONSULTINGBIZ INC T REPS INC TEAHEN GROUP TEMECULA VALLEY PONY COLT LEAG TITANIUM EDUCATIONAL SOLUTIONS VENTURE WORKS INC WALSH, BONITA K WILSON EDUPRISES LLC WOOD SOURCE WRIGHT, JAY R 30530 NEW ALBERTSONS INC SAVE ON PHARMACY 30534 BURGER KING 30550 LOOKING GOOD BUTY SUP BUTY CTR NAILS BY LOLA PAMS DONUTS NO 8 ROBERT WYSONG HAIR DESIGN 30570 TERESA L PRINCE CONNER 30580 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 30590 BURROUGHS, JOEL FERGUSON MIKE GLENCOE PIZZA SERVICES LLC PRESTOS GOURMET EXPRESS STEWS BARBER SHOP TRE-FLEUR INC - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A13 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 42015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42045 SAENZ, FRANK F 42050 GRADISCHEK, DENNIS S 42059 CALABRESE, GIOVANNI 42071 COUGHLIN, KELLY M 42080 MORALES, ARTEMIO L 42089 ARROYO, GILBERT A 42106 PATTERSON, JAY A 42134 MARTINEZ, JOSEPH E 42148 SERNA, JOHN O 42162 ECHEVERRIA, MIGUEL A 42176 A TOUCH OF CLASS CATERING CANDYS TREE SERVICE MCCANN, KEITH 42188 LITTRELL, WAYNE L 42201 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42327 D J MECHANICAL 42370 ISMAEL COLOMO JR - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A14 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 29950 DANCING BAREFOOT PHOTOGRAPHY EURO DOG TRAINING 29960 WINDCREST DESIGNS 29980 CLEMENTS, BLAINE CRAIN, ALANA L DENNISON, JESSIKA DU, FAULT R DUFFY, DARRIN M ESTELLE, KEVIN E LEVIN, JAY MAGALLANES, CRYSTAL MANCINI, LUCA N NOOR, SEDIG PARKER, LOLA F PRATT, DOUGLAS G SMITH, BRADLEY R XAN SYSTEMS ZETT, JANELLE 29990 ASE ENTERPRISES BAIRD, JAMIE BEUKELMAN, RANDAL BRIZENBINE, E CARTER, JESSICA E DALLMAN, MARK DOOLEY, LIANA K GAREEB, NABEEL K HESCH, FREDERICK HURD, ROBERT KELLER, JON M LACKOVIC, GORAN LENNARD, CANDICE L MAPLE, STEVEN E MARTINEZ, ANGEL MYERS, DAVID NUNEZ, RODEN POWERS, BRUCE SMITH, ERICA R 30000 CRESCENT HEIGHTS PORTOFINO APARTMENTS VALLEZ, LINDA 30010 ARELLANO, ERUBEY BOURASSA, PATRICK CERNUSCA, CRISTINA M DIAMOND VALLEY GROUP INC DIOL, AARON GRIBAUDO, DEREK HILL, DIANA LAZUR, JOSEPH PHAN, CHRIS PUGH, DERON L (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A15 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 30010 SALANGSAKUL, CHITTI SHARP LOGISTICS INC 30020 BASOCO, RUDY R BROOKS, DONALD R BURTON, R CHRISTENSEN, CYNTHIA L DAVIS, ANGELA M DAY, LINDA DEMOULIN, MARGARET V DULANEY, JEROD FELDT, MIKE A HERRERA, TRACEY KIM, KEVIN LEE, BARBARA N MACIAS, MARIA MCCONNELL, MICHAEL E MCINTOSH, RAYMOND T SHIN, TAI VIGO, NORMA P 30030 BADUQUI, NILSA BENNETT, NICHOLAS D COLEMAN, KENDALL L CROOKER, ROBERT H CULBERSON, PERRY A ESCOBEDO, BRENDA GUZICK, WILLIAM N INGHAM, HALEY LOCHE, GIOVANNI PEDROZA, J SCHRIMPF, LAURIE SCHURZ, JANET STRAND, SHAUN 30040 AIR WARE BAXTER, PENNY BROWN, JOSEPH A KIEBACH, JESS LABARRE, SHAUN RAMIREZ, NICOLE ROBINSON, ROBERT K STANDARD FLOOR CLEANING VALENZUELA, PEDRO N WAVEREP 30050 ANDERSON, ANDREW M BLOWERS, JENNIFER CLAYTON, JAMES W DAY, NATHAN DIPAOLO, S GRAHAM, ROBERT GURULE, JASON L HEMENWAY, WALTER J (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A16 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 30050 HILL, EDWARD J LYONS, SEAN M MAK ENTERPRISES MCKNIGHT MOTOR LOGISTICS MCKNIGHT, MORGAN MOSCATO, DANIEL OLI, I C 30060 ALLEN, HEATHER BARR, BRIAN D BERNABE, KAREN C CHAVEZ, ERIC CONNARY, FRED DEATON, JESSICA DIXON, FLORENCE L EASTERBROOK, CARY GRAHAM, DON HERNANDEZ, APRIL KERR, TODD M MAHMUD, ATALLAH NGUYEN, THUI T OZANICH, JENNIFER E RICHTER, KATIE L ROGERS, KENNETH E ROSE, STEVEN C ROUTH, JIM RUSSO, BRIAN SPASOFF, MATT J THOMASON, CHARLES B WASHINGTON, ANTHONY 30070 BALTIERIA, RAY L BALTIERRA, RAY V BANALES, JAMIE BRADHAM, DOUGLAS DUNCAN, ERIK W FRITZSCHE, CHARLES A FRITZSEHE, H GOTTLIEB, DAVID IBARRA, ROBERTO P LOMIBAO, RODNEY MCCLELLAND, CHARLES E MORGAN, DENNIS PRINCIPE, ZACK SANSONE, ANTHONY M SHELTON, JUDY A TENNIS, HEIDI M ZAMORA, JAMES R 30080 CHERRY, ROBERT L CLEMENTS, STEPHEN H CUNANAN, IRENEO DANILOFF, MICHAEL (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A17 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 30080 DUFFY, JOHN FOWLER, WILLIAM MARTINEZ, GARRETT MEISPER, CODY MILLER, AMY D PAULINO, JOHN J RODRIGUEZ, JAVIER ROTH, MICHAEL SWAIN, APRIL THOMAS, RE L 30090 AGAN, CINDY BELISLE, PETER W BYER, JOSH CLARK, SHERRY L COOKSON, JEFF J CUSTODIO, GERTRUDES FLORES, SERGIO A HASTINGS-CLAPP, CONSTANCE KING, ALISON M MADDEN, ROSEMARY T MARTIN, DAVID SINE, SHANNON SUMNER, MICHAEL D 30520 ADAMS, DAVID E ALLIS ENGINEERING AUDIOVISION SPECIALISTS LLC BANNING CROSSROADS INVESTMENT BEHROOZNIA, MOZAFAR A BOBBITT, STEVE M CHAMPION INTERNATIONALE COAST VALLEY CLAIM SERVICE DATA MICOM ELWOOD MICHELE FRANK, KATHY A GORTON, JOHN K GUSTINE, RANDAL G I CAN DIG IT KATIES VILLAGE CLEANERS KENT, CHRISTOPHER S LAVELL DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION LIBO ENTERPRISES LLC MATCO PET CENTER MFI INTL SALES CO MIA CRISTINA INC MICHAEL STAN MIDTGAARD, BENT S NICHOLS, ANDREW V NOELL LOUIS ALEX PACIFIC ACHIEVEMENT INC PELAEZ, MICHAEL G (Cont'd) - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A18 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2005 30520 PENTEL, BRIAN N PEONY PETERSON, BRAD PJ DENTAL PRODUCTS POSTAL ANNEX PROFESSIONAL DISPLAYS AND DIRE QUALTECH CONCRETE INC RAMIREZ, MARIANA RAPPAPORT, NAN ROSADO, JULIO A RUBIO, TOMAS R SALTEL, TANYA SALZBRUNN, JOHN H SAYLORS, DEREK STELLAR SKY PRODUCTIONS LLC STORY, TINA SUPER PEAK PERFORMANCE SOFTWAR SWAIN, JANET L T REPS INC TEAHEN GROUP TEMECULA SMOKE SHOP US LOSS MITIGATION ADVANTAGE WINKLESTEIN ALAN OD Y3K GRAFIX INC 30530 ALBERTSONS INC SAV ON PHARMACY STARBUCKS CORPORATION 30550 DESIGNERS CUT 2 HAIR BY WENDY BUZBEE LOOKING GOOD BUTY SUP BUTY CTR LOOKING GOOD SLON CHRIS SANDEE NAILS BY LOLA PAMS DONUTS NO 8 TENA, PENTEL H 30570 JAMES, CUNNIAN NATIONAL ONE MORTGAGE 30580 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST 30590 BURROUGHS, JOEL FERGUSON MIKE GLENCOE PIZZA SERVICES LLC LL BOOKSTORE OF TEMECULA PAPA, JOHNS PETERS, JESSICA PRESTOS GOURMET EXPRESS STEWS BARBER SHOP SWEET BEAN TARBELL F M CO INC TIF INVESTMENTS INC - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A19 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 42015 MUSTARD, ROBERT 42029 HOLM, FRITZ 42045 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42050 STILLMAN, DARYL M 42059 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, WINE COUNTRY CATERING 42071 MATUS, PETER P 42080 STOTELMYRE, T 42089 ARROYO, GILBERT A 42106 ROSEN, DARWIN 42120 LEICHTY, JEFFREY L 42134 SAATZER, DANIEL R 42148 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42162 MIYANIRA, EMIKO A 42176 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42188 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42200 OCCUPANT UNKNOWN, 42201 HANNA, GARY D 42214 HANNAM, JOHN D 42327 D J MECHANICAL 42342 SATHER JOSEPH INSTALLATION 42418 HERRERA COMUNICATIONS - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A20 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 2000 30000 PORTOFINO APARTMENTS 30520 ACCELERATED LEARNING SYSTEMS ASBELL ENTERPRISES COAST VALLEY CLAIM SERVICE KATIES VILLAGE CLEANERS MATCO PET CENTER MICHAELS REAL ESTATE CO PACK N MAIL PEONY PROFESSIONAL DISPLAYS AND DIRE WINKLESTEIN ALAN OD 30530 LUCKY STORES INC (DE) SAV-ON PHARMACY 30550 DESIGNERS CUT 2 LANI NAILS LOOKING GOOD BUTY SUP BUTY CTR LOOKING GOOD SLON CHRIS SANDEE NAILS BY LOLA NAILS BY STACEY PAMS DONUTS NO 8 PENTEL TENA HAIR STYLIST STONE-RUBIN LAURENE 30570 SILVER LINING CDS GIFTS CANDY 30580 CALIFORNIA BANK & TRUST INC 30590 FERGUSON MIKE R & M ENTERPRISES STEWS BARBER SHOP SWEET BEAN TARBELL F M CO INC - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A21 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 42015 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42029 HOLM, FRITZ 42045 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42050 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42071 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42080 BANKEL, LEO 42089 SHANNON, JAMES 42106 ROSEN, DARWIN 42120 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42134 WALL, BOB 42148 SHIPMAN, TIMOTHY E 42162 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42176 MASTON, DONALD 42188 RICH ENTERPRISES RICH, RANDY 42200 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42201 VASQUES, EVA 42214 OCCUPANT UNKNOWNN 42327 D J MECHANICAL 42342 SATHER JOSEPH INSTALLATION 42418 HERRERA DOLORES ART CTR - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A22 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1995 30520 PACK N MAIL PEONY PROFESSIONAL DISPLAYS AND DIRE TEMECULA VALLEY OPTOMETRY TOY KENNETH DC WINKLESTEIN ALAN 30530 LUCKY STORES INC 30550 BOWERS DEBBIE ESTHETIQUES LANI NAILS PAMS DONUTS NO 8 30570 BRENDAS CARLTON CARDS & GIFTS DECORATING CONNECTION INC 30590 COACHS PIZZA PLUS FASHION ART SWEET BEAN TRE-FLEUR INC - COSMIC DR EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A23 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 42015 WAGSTER, MIKE 42029 HOLM, FRITZ 42045 LANIER, V M 42050 STILLMAN, DARYL 42080 BANKEL, LEO 42106 ROSEN, DARWIN 42134 WALL, BOB 42188 RICH ENTERPRISES 42298 MARK W BARTH 42342 SATHER JOSEPH INSTALLATION 42418 HERRERA DOLORES ART CTR - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD EDR Digital Archive 5028780.5 Page: A24 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1992 30101 WILSON, WALKER 30520 FAMILY SPORTS AND SKI INC FLC DEVELOPMENT INC HELMS GEORGE L INC HILL COUNTRY NURSERIES INC PAK MAIL PROFESSIONAL DISPLAYS AND DIRE TEMECULA VALLEY OPTOMETRY TOY KENNETH DC WINKLESTEIN ALAN 30530 LUCKY STORES INC 30570 BRENDAS CARLTON CARDS & GIFTS 30590 TRE-FLEUR INC - COSMIC DR Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A25 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A26 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1990 - COSMIC DR Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A27 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A28 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1985 - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A29 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1980 - RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD Haines Criss-Cross Directory 5028780.5 Page: A30 SourceTarget Street Cross Street 1975 EDR Historical Topo Map Report Inquiry Number: 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com with QuadMatch™ Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 August 22, 2017 5028780.4 EDR Historical Topo Map Report EDR Inquiry # Search Results: P.O.# Project: Maps Provided: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. page- Coordinates: Latitude: Longitude: UTM Zone: UTM X Meters: UTM Y Meters: Elevation: Contact: Site Name: Client Name: 1901 1942 1943 1947 1948, 1949 1950, 1953 1968, 1973 1975, 1978, 1979 2012 08/22/17 Vacant Land Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200 Temecula, CA 92592 Torrance, CA 90501-0000 5028780.4 Colleen Tubridy EDR Topographic Map Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. EDR’s Historical Topo Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topo Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the late 1800s. NA 33.506376 33° 30' 23" North 17-195274.1 -117.134835 -117° 8' 5" West Zone 11 North 487476.71 3707434.26 1180.79' above sea level This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 5028780 4 2 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1901 Source Sheets 1901 Elsinore 30-minute, 125000 1901 San Luis Rey 30-minute, 125000 1942 Source Sheets 1942 Murrieta 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1939 1943 Source Sheets 1943 Murrieta 15-minute, 62500 Aerial Photo Revised 1939 1947 Source Sheets 1947 TEMECULA 15-minute, 50000 1947 MURRIETA 15-minute, 50000 5028780 4 3 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1948, 1949 Source Sheets 1948 Temecula 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1949 Pechanga 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1950, 1953 Source Sheets 1950 Temecula 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1950 Pechanga 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1947 1953 Murrieta 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1951 1953 Bachelor Mtn. 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1951 1968, 1973 Source Sheets 1968 Pechanga 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1967 1968 Temecula 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1967 1973 Murrieta 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1973 1973 Bachelor Mtn. 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1973 1973 Bachelor Mtn 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1973 5028780 4 4 page Topo Sheet Key This EDR Topo Map Report is based upon the following USGS topographic map sheets. - 1975, 1978, 1979 Source Sheets 1975 Temecula 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1975 1978 Bachelor Mtn 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1973 1979 Murrieta 7.5-minute, 24000 Aerial Photo Revised 1976 2012 Source Sheets 2012 Bachelor Mountain 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Pechanga 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Temecula 7.5-minute, 24000 2012 Murrieta 7.5-minute, 24000 5028780 4 5 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1901 1901 TP, Elsinore, 1901, 30-minute S, San Luis Rey, 1901, 30-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 6 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1942 1942 TP, Murrieta, 1942, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 7 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1943 1943 TP, Murrieta, 1943, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 8 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1947 1947 TP, MURRIETA, 1947, 15-minute S, TEMECULA, 1947, 15-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 9 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1948, 1949 1948, 1949 SE, Pechanga, 1949, 7.5-minute SW, Temecula, 1948, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 10 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1950, 1953 1950, 1953 TP, Murrieta, 1953, 7.5-minute NE, Bachelor Mtn., 1953, 7.5-minute SE, Pechanga, 1950, 7.5-minute SW, Temecula, 1950, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 11 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1968, 1973 1968, 1973 TP, Murrieta, 1973, 7.5-minute NE, Bachelor Mtn., 1973, 7.5-minute SE, Pechanga, 1968, 7.5-minute SW, Temecula, 1968, 7.5-minute NE, Bachelor Mtn, 1973, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 12 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 1975, 1978, 1979 1975, 1978, 1979 TP, Murrieta, 1979, 7.5-minute NE, Bachelor Mtn, 1978, 7.5-minute SW, Temecula, 1975, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 13 Topographic Map page- APPENDIX B: Topographic Maps Project No. Date of Topographic Map:Key: Subject Property 2012 2012 TP, Murrieta, 2012, 7.5-minute NE, Bachelor Mountain, 2012, 7.5-minute SE, Pechanga, 2012, 7.5-minute SW, Temecula, 2012, 7.5-minute 0 Miles 0.25 0.5 1 1.5 5028780 4 14 APPENDIX C: REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT FORM-LBC-ASH ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floor Shelton, CT 06484 Toll Free: 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.com Vacant Land Rancho California Road and Cosmic Drive Temecula, CA 92592 Inquiry Number: 5028780.2s August 22, 2017 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 53 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5 Physical Setting Source Map A-18 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-20 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC5028780.2s Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2017 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 COORDINATES 33.5063760 - 33˚ 30’ 22.95’’Latitude (North): 117.1348350 - 117˚ 8’ 5.40’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 487476.4UTM X (Meters): 3707241.5UTM Y (Meters): 1186 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 5641304 MURRIETA, CATarget Property Map: 2012Version Date: 5640928 BACHELOR MOUNTAIN, CANortheast Map: 2012Version Date: 5636481 PECHANGA, CASoutheast Map: 2012Version Date: 5640254 TEMECULA, CASouthwest Map: 2012Version Date: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20140530, 20140603Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 5028780.2s Page 2 13 TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH 31555 RANCHO VISTA R ENVIROSTOR, SCH Higher 5255, 0.995, East 12 ARCO SERVICE STATION 27641 YNEZ RANCHO RO LUST, ENF, HIST CORTESE, Notify 65 Lower 3893, 0.737, WSW 11 MARGARITA MIDDLE SCH 30600 MARGARITA ROAD ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 3650, 0.691, NNE 10 THESSALONIKA FAMILY 30380 COLINA VERDE S ENVIROSTOR Lower 3234, 0.613, South 9 REPLANET LLC 30530 RANCHO CALIFOR SWRCY Lower 2014, 0.381, ENE 8 SHELL SERVICE STATIO 29750 RANCHO CALIFOR RCRA-SQG, LUST, FINDS Lower 1949, 0.369, West B7 TEMECULA CAR WASH 29766 RANCHO CALIFOR LUST, UST Lower 1343, 0.254, WNW B6 TEMECULA CAR WASH 29766 RANCHO CALIF R LUST, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST Lower 1343, 0.254, WNW 5 VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHO 29915 MIRA LOMA DRIV ENVIROSTOR, SCH Lower 1107, 0.210, South 4 CHANELLE AND BRANDOS 29590 MIRA LOMA DR RCRA NonGen / NLR Lower 479, 0.091, WSW 3 STEAM SUPERIOR 30071 LEVANDE PL EDR Hist Cleaner Lower 248, 0.047, SSW A2 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WA 30192 RANCHO CALIFOR RCRA-LQG Lower 132, 0.025, North A1 WELL 138 30192 RANCHO CALIFOR RCRA-LQG Lower 132, 0.025, North MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE TEMECULA, CA 92592 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR. DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing SEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS Land Use Control Information System US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 4 Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land SLIC Statewide SLIC Cases State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing UST Active UST Facilities AST Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands ODI Open Dump Inventory DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations IHS OPEN DUMPS Open Dumps on Indian Land Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register HIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database CDL Clandestine Drug Labs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites US CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST SWEEPS UST Listing HIST UST Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database CA FID UST Facility Inventory Database Local Land Records LIENS Environmental Liens Listing LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System CHMIRS California Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites DOD Department of Defense Sites SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ROD Records Of Decision RMP Risk Management Plans RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System PRP Potentially Responsible Parties PADS PCB Activity Database System ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database RADINFO Radiation Information Database HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing DOT OPS Incident and Accident Data CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations FUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 US MINES Mines Master Index File ABANDONED MINES Abandoned Mines FINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry System UXO Unexploded Ordnance Sites ECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information DOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities EMI Emissions Inventory Data ENF Enforcement Action Listing Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing HAZNET Facility and Manifest Data ICE ICE HIST CORTESE Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database MINES Mines Site Location Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing NPDES NPDES Permits Listing PEST LIC Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing PROC Certified Processors Database UIC UIC Listing WASTEWATER PITS Oil Wastewater Pits Listing WDS Waste Discharge System WIP Well Investigation Program Case List EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants EDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there are 2 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WELL 138 30192 RANCHO CALIFOR N 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) A1 8 RANCHO CALIFORNIA WA 30192 RANCHO CALIFOR N 0 - 1/8 (0.025 mi.) A2 9 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2017 has revealed that there are 4 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH 31555 RANCHO VISTA R E 1/2 - 1 (0.995 mi.) 13 49 Facility Id: 33820013 Status: No Action Required PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHO 29915 MIRA LOMA DRIV S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.210 mi.) 5 12 Facility Id: 33820007 Status: No Action Required THESSALONIKA FAMILY 30380 COLINA VERDE S S 1/2 - 1 (0.613 mi.) 10 22 Facility Id: 37830008 Status: No Action Required MARGARITA MIDDLE SCH 30600 MARGARITA ROAD NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.691 mi.) 11 23 Facility Id: 33820006 Status: No Action Required EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ TEMECULA CAR WASH 29766 RANCHO CALIF R WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.) B6 14 Database: RIVERSIDE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Facility Id: 200117875 Facility Status: 0 TEMECULA CAR WASH 29766 RANCHO CALIFOR WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.254 mi.) B7 16 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Global Id: T0606540629 SHELL SERVICE STATIO 29750 RANCHO CALIFOR W 1/4 - 1/2 (0.369 mi.) 8 18 Database: RIVERSIDE CO. LUST, Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Database: LUST, Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Id: 200118093 Global Id: T0606564546 Facility Status: 9 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites SWRCY: A listing of recycling facilities in California. A review of the SWRCY list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/13/2017 has revealed that there is 1 SWRCY site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ REPLANET LLC 30530 RANCHO CALIFOR ENE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.381 mi.) 9 22 Cert Id: RC156996.001 Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites SCH: This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category. depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the. environment they pose. A review of the SCH list, as provided by EDR, and dated 07/31/2017 has revealed that there is 1 SCH EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHO 29915 MIRA LOMA DRIV S 1/8 - 1/4 (0.210 mi.) 5 12 Facility Id: 33820007 Status: No Action Required Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/12/2016 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CHANELLE AND BRANDOS 29590 MIRA LOMA DR WSW 0 - 1/8 (0.091 mi.) 4 11 Notify 65: Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. A review of the Notify 65 list, as provided by EDR, and dated 12/16/2016 has revealed that there is 1 Notify 65 site within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO SERVICE STATION 27641 YNEZ RANCHO RO WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.737 mi.) 12 26 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR Hist Cleaner list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there is 1 EDR Hist Cleaner site within approximately 0.125 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STEAM SUPERIOR 30071 LEVANDE PL SSW 0 - 1/8 (0.047 mi.) 3 10 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC5028780.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 There were no unmapped sites in this report. EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 115 kV 120 1160 116012001120 1 200 1 2 0 0 1 2001160124 0 1 2 4 0 112 0 1 2 0 0 120 0 120 0 1 2 00 12 4 0 1120 1120 116012 401160 1 2 0 0 11201 2 0 0 1 2 00108 0 1 1 20 1 1 6 011601160 116 011 601 16011 6011 601 1 6011 20 12401 2 4 0 12 001 2 0 0 120012001 200 1160 1160 1 1 6 0 1160 1160 1040 1 0 401 08 010801080108 0 108 0 10801 0 8 0 1080 120011601 1 2 0 1 1 201120 112 0 1 120112011 2 0 1120 11201 1 2 0 11 2 0 1120 11 20 120 0 111 6 0 12801 2 1 20 0 1200120 012801240 1240 12 4 0 1 2 1 2 4 0 1 2 00 11 6 0 1160 1 1 6 01160 120 0 1200 1 20 0 1 21200 12001240 1 241240 12401 1601 1 601200120 0 1 2 401 1240 1 0 8 0 112012401 160112012401160 116012401200 120011 6 0 1160 1 1 60 11601200 1200 1201 1 60 1161120112011201120112010801080 1 080104010801040 1 16 0 1 20 0 12 4 0 12 40116012401 2 8 12801 1 601160 1 2 0 0 12 0 0 1 20012001 240 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.112011601160 1200 1 1 2 0 12401 200 12 0 0 1200 12001200 116 0 1160 1160 1080 1160 1120 1120 1120 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 2 NR NR NR 0 2 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 4 NR 3 0 1 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 3 NR NR 3 0 0 0.500LUST TC5028780.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SLIC State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500IHS OPEN DUMPS Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250SCH 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SWEEPS UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HIST UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CA FID UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS TC5028780.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250ABANDONED MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEMI 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAZNET TC5028780.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MINES 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPEST LIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 1 NR 1 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WASTEWATER PITS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 1 NR NR NR NR 1 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 14 0 4 4 2 4 0- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC5028780.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/01/1988Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: DistrictLegal status: (951) 296-6967Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: TEMECULA, CA 92589 P.O. BOX 9017Owner/operator address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICTOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/01/2010Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: DistrictLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICTOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: CALVERTM@RANCHOWATER.COMContact email: (951) 296-6967Contact telephone: USContact country: TEMECULA, CA 92589 P.O. BOX 9017Contact address: MICHAEL M CALVERTContact: TEMECULA, CA 92589 P.O. BOX 9017Mailing address: CAC002637966EPA ID: TEMECULA, CA 92591 30192 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROADFacility address: WELL 138Facility name: 01/19/2010Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 132 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.025 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1103 ft. < 1/8 TEMECULA, CA 92591 North 30192 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CAC002637966 A1 RCRA-LQGWELL 138 1014386507 TC5028780.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: 791. Waste name: 791. Waste code: 122. Waste name: 122. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): WELL 138 (Continued)1014386507 hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: CALVERTM@RANCHOWATER.COMContact email: (951) 296-6967Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: MICHAEL M CALVERTContact: TEMECULA, CA 92589 P.O. BOX 9017Mailing address: CAC002574195EPA ID: TEMECULA, CA 92595 30192 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROADFacility address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL#138Facility name: 05/13/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 132 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.025 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1103 ft. < 1/8 TEMECULA, CA 92595 North 30192 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CAC002574195 A2 RCRA-LQGRANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL#138 1012175443 TC5028780.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/01/1988Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: DistrictLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATEROwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 02/01/1988Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: DistrictLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: TEMECULA, CA 92589 P.O. BOX 9017Owner/operator address: RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATEROwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time RANCHO CALIFORNIA WATER DISTRICT WELL#138 (Continued) 1012175443 Carpet And Upholstery Cleaning1997 STEAM SUPERIOR Carpet And Upholstery Cleaning1996 STEAM SUPERIOR Carpet And Upholstery Cleaning1995 STEAM SUPERIOR Carpet And Upholstery Cleaning1994 STEAM SUPERIOR Type:Year: Name: EDR Hist Cleaner 248 ft. 0.047 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1182 ft. < 1/8 TEMECULA, CA 92592 SSW 30071 LEVANDE PL N/A 3 EDR Hist CleanerSTEAM SUPERIOR 1018476078 TC5028780.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: YesTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/17/2007Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: CHANELLE AND BRANDOS TRANSPORT LLCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/17/2007Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: TEMECULA, CA 92592 29590 MIRA LOMA DR STE 205Owner/operator address: CHANELLE AND BRANDOS TRANSPORT LLCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: BC.JAIME@YAHOO.COMContact email: 732-558-3730Contact telephone: USContact country: TEMECULA, CA 92592 29590 MIRA LOMA DR STE 205Contact address: JAIME A ESCOLEROContact: CAR000182162EPA ID: TEMECULA, CA 92592 STE 205 29590 MIRA LOMA DRFacility address: CHANELLE AND BRANDOS TRANSPORT LLCFacility name: 03/12/2007Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 479 ft. 0.091 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1114 ft. < 1/8 TEMECULA, CA 92592 WSW 29590 MIRA LOMA DR CAR000182162 4 RCRA NonGen / NLRCHANELLE AND BRANDOS TRANSPORT LLC 1010314112 TC5028780.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: CHANELLE AND BRANDOS TRANSPORT LLC (Continued) 1010314112 PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820007Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404239Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 944060008Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-VAIL ELEM. ADDITIONAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA USDAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: SCHOOL - ELEMENTARYPast Use: 944060008APN: -117.1363Longitude: 33.50258Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 75Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Charles RidenourSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 9.94Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404239Site Code: 07/24/2001Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33820007Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 1107 ft. 0.210 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1118 ft. 1/8-1/4 TEMECULA, CA 92592 South SCH29915 MIRA LOMA DRIVE N/A 5 ENVIROSTORVAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S118756750 TC5028780.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820007Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404239Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 944060008Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOLAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-VAIL ELEM. ADDITIONAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA USDAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: SCHOOL - ELEMENTARYPast Use: 944060008APN: -117.1363Longitude: 33.50258Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 07/24/2001Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 28Senate: 75Assembly: 404239Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Charles RidenourSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 9.94Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33820007Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S118756750 TC5028780.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: VAIL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S118756750 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-28-91Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 33-000-049422-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1743Owner Tank Id: 04-25-90Created Date: 11-23-92Action Date: 11-23-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 49422Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: Not reportedFstatus Decode: Soil only is impactedCasetype Decode: 0Facility Status: Soil onlyCase Type: Referred to Water BoardSite Closed: WintersEmployee: 200117875Facility ID: RIVERSIDERegion: RIVERSIDE CO. LUST: 1343 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B 0.254 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1111 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTTEMECULA, CA 92390 WNW SWEEPS UST29766 RANCHO CALIF RD N/A B6 LUSTTEMECULA CAR WASH U002095705 TC5028780.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: TEMECULA 92390Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOX 3634Mailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146948118Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 33006837Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-28-91Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 33-000-049422-000003SWRCB Tank Id: 1743Owner Tank Id: 04-25-90Created Date: 11-23-92Action Date: 11-23-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 49422Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 08-28-91Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 33-000-049422-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 1743Owner Tank Id: 04-25-90Created Date: 11-23-92Action Date: 11-23-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 1Number: 49422Comp Number: ActiveStatus: TEMECULA CAR WASH (Continued) U002095705 TC5028780.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Other Report - #UST Sample Analytical ReportAction: 02/06/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 09/28/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/21/2001Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0606540629Global Id: 09/28/2001Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0606540629Global Id: 02/07/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0606540629Global Id: Status History: 9519558980Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3880 LEMON ST SUITE 200Address: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: Riverside County LOP Closed CasesContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0606540629Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 200117875LOC Case Number: 9UT4141RB Case Number: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: SAN DIEGO RWQCB (REGION 9)Lead Agency: 02/07/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.142112Longitude: 33.506924Latitude: T0606540629Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1343 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B 0.254 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1111 ft. 1/4-1/2 TEMECULA, CA 92591 WNW UST29766 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD N/A B7 LUSTTEMECULA CAR WASH U002168211 TC5028780.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 09/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 02/29/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Staff Letter - #R9-2002-0276Action: 09/13/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 11/21/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Staff Letter - #R9-2002-0276Action: 08/15/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 02/27/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 09/18/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 10/21/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/07/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/24/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Leak BeganAction: 01/01/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: TEMECULA CAR WASH (Continued) U002168211 TC5028780.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.139676Longitude: 33.509035Latitude: RIVERSIDE COUNTYPermitting Agency: 740Facility ID: UST: ExcavationAction: 06/07/2002Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/28/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 12/02/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 02/02/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606540629Global Id: * Referral to Regional Board or Another State AgencyAction: 01/20/2004Date: TEMECULA CAR WASH (Continued) U002168211 hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: GOBERNAL@SHELLOPUS.COMContact email: (818) 759-7910Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: FRANCISCO O BERNALContact: HOUSTON, TX 770672508 12700 NORTHBOROUGH DR MFT240G SHELL OIL PRODUCTS USMailing address: CAR000087023EPA ID: TEMECULA, CA 92503 SAP #121783 29750 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROADFacility address: SHELL SERVICE STATIONFacility name: 02/26/2004Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 1949 ft. 0.369 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1118 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDSTEMECULA, CA 92503 West LUST29750 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD CAR000087023 8 RCRA-SQGSHELL SERVICE STATION 1004676576 TC5028780.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SHELL SERVICE STATIONSite name: 02/26/2004Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/01/1998Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77252 PO BOX 2648Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC DBA SHELL OIL PROwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 08/01/1998Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: SHELL OIL PRODUCTS USOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (713) 241-5036Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: HOUSTON, TX 77252 P O BOX 2099Owner/operator address: EQUILON ENTERPRISESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1004676576 TC5028780.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0606564546Global Id: 01/13/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0606564546Global Id: Status History: 9519558980Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3880 LEMON ST SUITE 200Address: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: Riverside County LOP Closed CasesContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0606564546Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 200118093LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: RIVCase Worker: RIVERSIDE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 01/13/2006Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.142944Longitude: 33.506959Latitude: T0606564546Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: No violations foundViolation Status: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Not Defined. Waste name: D000. Waste code: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: TEXACO SERVICE STATIONSite name: 11/22/2000Date form received by agency: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1004676576 TC5028780.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation additional FINDS: detail in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access STATE MASTER Environmental Interest/Information System 110055689991Registry ID: FINDS: Closed/Action completedFstatus Decode: An Aquifer used for Drinking Water supply has been contaminated.Casetype Decode: closed/action completedFacility Status: Drinking Water Aquifer affectedCase Type: YesSite Closed: Shurlow-LOPEmployee: 200118093Facility ID: RIVERSIDERegion: RIVERSIDE CO. LUST: Not reportedAction: 11/19/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606564546Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 11/19/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606564546Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 10/29/2004Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606564546Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 11/19/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T0606564546Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/19/2001Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0606564546Global Id: 11/19/2001Status Date: SHELL SERVICE STATION (Continued) 1004676576 TC5028780.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation rePlanet LLCOrganization Name: 151891Organization ID: CLOSEDSunday Hours Of Operation: 10:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pmSaturday Hours Of Operation: 10:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pmFriday Hours Of Operation: 10:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pmThursday Hours Of Operation: 10:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pmWednesday Hours Of Operation: 10:00 am - 4:30 pm; Closed 1:00 pm - 1:30 pmTuesday Hours Of Operation: CLOSEDMonday Hours Of Operation: N/AAgency: YBimetal: YPlastic: YGlass: YAluminium: 05/01/2012Operation Begin Date: NRural: NGrand Father: (951) 520-1700Phone Number: Not reportedEmail: http://www.replanet.comWebsite: 91764Mailing Zip Code: CAMailing State: OntarioMailing City: 800 N Haven Ave Suite 120Mailing Address: RC156996.001Cert Id: 156996Reg Id: SWRCY: 2014 ft. 0.381 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1126 ft. 1/4-1/2 TEMECULA, CA 92591 ENE 30530 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD N/A 9 SWRCYREPLANET LLC S107137943 CalMortgageFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 75Assembly: Cleanup SacramentoDivision Branch: William BeckmanSupervisor: Sandra KarinenProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 0Acres: CalmortgageSite Type Detailed: CalmortgageSite Type: 400490Site Code: 10/05/1994Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 37830008Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3234 ft. 0.613 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1130 ft. 1/2-1 TEMECULA, CA 92592 South 30380 COLINA VERDE ST N/A 10 ENVIROSTORTHESSALONIKA FAMILY SERVICES - UNIT 4 S118756891 TC5028780.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: the property. no acton was needed for this property; there is no contamination on is proposed. A Phase I Report was prepared by DTSC and concluded that a youth group home/residential treatment facility. No change in use contains a single-family home that is currently being used by TFS as Assessment for Thessalonika Family Services (TFS). This property Pursuant to the MOU, DTSC has prepared a Phase I EnvironmentalComments: 10/05/1994Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 37830008Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 400490Alias Name: NMAPotential Description: No Contaminants foundConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: NONEPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.1330Longitude: 33.49673Latitude: THESSALONIKA FAMILY SERVICES - UNIT 4 (Continued) S118756891 Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 75Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Charles RidenourSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 4.9Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404237Site Code: 07/24/2001Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33820006Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3650 ft. 0.691 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 1185 ft. 1/2-1 TEMECULA, CA 92591 NNE SCH30600 MARGARITA ROAD N/A 11 ENVIROSTORMARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL S118756749 TC5028780.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 4.9Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33820006Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820006Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404237Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 921250035Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USDAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use: 921250035APN: -117.1268Longitude: 33.51677Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756749 TC5028780.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/24/2001Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820006Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404237Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 921250035Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USDAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOLAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: SCHOOL - MIDDLEPast Use: 921250035APN: -117.1268Longitude: 33.51677Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 07/24/2001Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 28Senate: 75Assembly: 404237Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Charles RidenourSupervisor: Kamili SiglowideProject Manager: MARGARITA MIDDLE SCHOOL (Continued) S118756749 TC5028780.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 02/20/2001Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 08/19/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 05/07/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0606501111Global Id: Status History: 6195213374Phone Number: sean.mcclain@waterboards.ca.govEmail: SAN DIEGOCity: 2375 NORTHSIDE DRIVE, SUITE 100Address: SAN DIEGO RWQCB (REGION 9)Organization Name: SEAN MCCLAINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0606501111Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Quarterly Report for WDR General Permit under the Site Documents tab. model and a corrective action plan. For more information see the soil and groundwater remediation and preparation of a site conceptual site since 1999 have include completion of assessment, initiation of the site since approximately 1987. Environmental activities at the hydrocarbon impact in soul and groundwater have been in progress at assessment and remediation activities related to petroleum of treated groundwater from a VOC cleanup site. Environmental This site is enrolled under general WDR R9-2008-0138 for reinjectionSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 9UT1031RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: SMCase Worker: SAN DIEGO RWQCB (REGION 9)Lead Agency: 05/07/2012Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.149386703968Longitude: 33.5032672887946Latitude: T0606501111Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 3893 ft. 0.737 mi.Notify 65 Relative: Lower Actual: 1026 ft. 1/2-1 HIST CORTESETEMECULA, CA 90082 WSW ENF27641 YNEZ RANCHO ROAD N/A 12 LUSTARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 09/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 05/21/2010Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 12/05/2001Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 10/15/2001Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 05/08/2001Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 03/27/2001Status Date: Open - Verification MonitoringStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 03/15/2002Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 08/19/1988Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 04/21/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 04/18/2005Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 11/02/2004Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 11/17/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 08/21/2003Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0606501111Global Id: 04/18/2002Status Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 01/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 07/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 08/19/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Notification - Fee Title Owners NoticeAction: 04/05/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Notification - Public Notice of Case ClosureAction: 04/05/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 03/28/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 11/21/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NPDES / WDR ReportsAction: 04/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: NPDES / WDR ReportsAction: 07/30/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 03/28/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 08/03/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 11/16/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Leak BeganAction: 08/19/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/16/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 02/17/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 08/19/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff Letter - #R9-2002-318Action: 09/24/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 10/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/07/2012Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/29/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Notice of Public Hearing / Board ActionAction: 11/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 01/21/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 10/31/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Interim Remedial Action PlanAction: 03/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 09/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/31/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/31/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/31/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/08/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/23/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/31/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 10/30/2003Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 02/17/2010Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 01/31/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 10/23/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Verbal EnforcementAction: 02/25/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 03/14/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/02/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/31/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 08/17/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/31/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: UnknownAction: 02/24/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 11/02/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2010Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 08/19/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 02/11/2009Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 10/07/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 12/02/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 04/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: File review - #RCDEH upload site file 5/1/2015Action: 01/31/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 09/10/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 09/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2008Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation * Verbal CommunicationAction: 08/26/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 06/28/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Historical EnforcementAction: 07/25/1990Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 02/26/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Waste Discharge RequirementsAction: 11/17/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: NPDES / WDR ReportsAction: 10/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other WorkplanAction: 01/20/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 01/22/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 03/06/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 03/29/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 04/20/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation WorkplanAction: 03/15/2002Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: NPDES / WDR ReportsAction: 07/30/2007Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 06/02/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/31/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Well Installation ReportAction: 03/26/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 09/15/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 03/26/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Other Report / DocumentAction: 04/19/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 10/22/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: File reviewAction: 02/07/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Clean-up and Abatement OrderAction: 02/14/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 06/29/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Clean-up and Abatement OrderAction: 10/22/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 09/02/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: MeetingAction: 10/07/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 07/17/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 06/20/2006Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/31/2002Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2000Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2002Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff LetterAction: 05/27/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Site Visit / Inspection / SamplingAction: 02/28/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 12/04/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: * Verbal CommunicationAction: 01/31/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Staff Letter - #R9-2005-0178Action: 06/10/2005Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 01/17/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 07/31/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2009Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: CorrespondenceAction: 03/27/2012Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Referral to Regional Board - #Riverside County Case FileAction: 01/31/2001Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Remedial Progress ReportAction: 04/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil and Water Investigation ReportAction: 06/30/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Corrective Action Plan / Remedial Action PlanAction: 11/17/2003Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2004Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 04/30/2005Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 01/30/2006Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Monitoring Report - QuarterlyAction: 10/30/2005Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFstatus Decode: An Aquifer used for Drinking Water supply has been contaminated.Casetype Decode: 0Facility Status: Drinking Water Aquifer affectedCase Type: Referred to Water BoardSite Closed: WintersEmployee: 88778Facility ID: RIVERSIDERegion: RIVERSIDE CO. LUST: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 10/01/2009Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/20/2009Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Free Product RemovalAction: 01/16/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 07/01/2009Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 03/17/1992Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 06/20/2002Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Soil Vapor Extraction (SVE)Action: 04/20/2007Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ExcavationAction: 10/16/1993Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: Pump & Treat (P&T) GroundwaterAction: 01/01/2001Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0606501111Global Id: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: Not reportedTermination Date: 06/12/2001Expiration/Review Date: 06/13/1996Effective Date: 04/28/1992Status Date: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: N301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: OTHNpdes Type: MinorMajor-Minor: CAG919002Npdes# CA#: 96-041Order #: 9Region: NPDES PermitsReg Measure Type: 146762Reg Measure Id: Not reportedWDID: 1# Of Programs: NPDESWWProgram Category2: NPDESWWProgram Category1: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: Not reportedFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedThreat To Water Quality: Not reportedDesign Flow: Enf ActionSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Gasoline Service StationsSIC Desc 1: 5541SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: Not reported# Of Agencies: Not reportedAgency Type: All other facilitiesFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: Not reportedAgency Name: 206209Facility Id: 9Region: ENF: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0.4Design Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Gasoline Service StationsSIC Desc 1: 5541SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: All other facilitiesFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: ARCO Petroleum Products Company La Palma (BP)Agency Name: 206209Facility Id: 9Region: 24000Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 24000Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 24000Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 24000Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: 2003-06-16Latest Milestone Completion Date: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: payment of $24,000 ACL for mandatory minimum penalties. Order adopted accepting ARCO’s waiver of hearing andDescription: Enforcement - 9 000000941Title: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 03/13/2002Effective Date: Admin Civil LiabilityEnforcement Action Type: R9-2002-0031Order / Resolution Number: 9Region: 239787Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: GIndividual/General: NStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedDescription: Enforcement - 9 000000941Title: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: Not reportedEffective Date: Staff Enforcement LetterEnforcement Action Type: UNKNOWNOrder / Resolution Number: 9Region: 237208Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: YStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: 02/20/2004Termination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 04/25/2001Effective Date: 04/25/2001Status Date: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: CAG919002Npdes# CA#: 01-096Order #: 9Region: EnrolleeReg Measure Type: 214049Reg Measure Id: 9 000000941WDID: 1# Of Programs: NPDESWWProgram Category2: NPDESWWProgram Category1: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: MiscellaneousFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: AComplexity: 3Threat To Water Quality: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 04/25/2001Effective Date: 04/25/2001Status Date: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: CAG919002Npdes# CA#: 01-096Order #: 9Region: EnrolleeReg Measure Type: 214049Reg Measure Id: 9 000000941WDID: 1# Of Programs: NPDESWWProgram Category2: NPDESWWProgram Category1: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: MiscellaneousFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: AComplexity: 3Threat To Water Quality: 0.4Design Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Gasoline Service StationsSIC Desc 1: 5541SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: All other facilitiesFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: ARCO Petroleum Products Company La Palma (BP)Agency Name: 206209Facility Id: 9Region: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Gasoline Service StationsSIC Desc 1: 5541SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: All other facilitiesFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: ARCO Petroleum Products Company La Palma (BP)Agency Name: 206209Facility Id: 9Region: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedDescription: Enforcement - 9 000000941Title: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: Not reportedEffective Date: Staff Enforcement LetterEnforcement Action Type: UNKNOWNOrder / Resolution Number: 9Region: 237207Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: YStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: 02/20/2004Termination Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: penalties, but issued as an administrative civil liability. amount of $27,000. Officially for mandatory minimum Complaint issued for violations of Order 96-41 in theDescription: Enforcement - 9 000000941Title: WithdrawnStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 12/19/2001Effective Date: Admin Civil LiabilityEnforcement Action Type: R9-2001-335Order / Resolution Number: 9Region: 238655Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: YStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: 02/20/2004Termination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 04/25/2001Effective Date: 04/25/2001Status Date: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: CAG919002Npdes# CA#: 01-096Order #: 9Region: EnrolleeReg Measure Type: 214049Reg Measure Id: 9 000000941WDID: 1# Of Programs: NPDESWWProgram Category2: NPDESWWProgram Category1: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: MiscellaneousFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: AComplexity: 3Threat To Water Quality: 0.4Design Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: CAG919002Npdes# CA#: 01-096Order #: 9Region: EnrolleeReg Measure Type: 214049Reg Measure Id: 9 000000941WDID: 1# Of Programs: NPDESWWProgram Category2: NPDESWWProgram Category1: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: MiscellaneousFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: AComplexity: 3Threat To Water Quality: 0.4Design Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Gasoline Service StationsSIC Desc 1: 5541SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: All other facilitiesFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: ARCO Petroleum Products Company La Palma (BP)Agency Name: 206209Facility Id: 9Region: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedIncident Description: Not reportedIssue Date: Not reportedDischarge Date: Not reportedFacility Type: Not reportedBoard File Number: Not reportedStaff Initials: Not reportedDate Reported: NOTIFY 65: 9UT1031Reg Id: LTNKAReg By: 33Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 0Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0Project $ Completed: 0Liability $ Paid: 0Project $ Amount: 0Liability $ Amount: 0Initial Assessed Amount: 0Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: NPDNONMUNIPRCSProgram: several constituents. See also Viol.# 85181, Enf. # 31429. Didn’t sample forDescription: Enforcement - 9 000000941Title: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: 12/10/2001Termination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 12/10/2001Effective Date: Staff Enforcement LetterEnforcement Action Type: UNKNOWNOrder / Resolution Number: 9Region: 238449Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: YStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: 02/20/2004Termination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: 04/25/2001Effective Date: 04/25/2001Status Date: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: ARCO SERVICE STATION #3012 (Continued) S100231600 TC5028780.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820016Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820013Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404544Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404350Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404340Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021580154Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 955020001Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-TEMECULA VLY HS EXPAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-TEMECULA VLY HI ADDTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-PRPSD TME VLY HS ADDAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITIONAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: 955020001APN: -117.1161Longitude: 33.50140Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 28Senate: 75Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Angela GarciaProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: .5Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404544Site Code: 06/04/2002Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: 33820013Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 5255 ft. 0.995 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 1222 ft. 1/2-1 TEMECULA, CA 92592 East SCH31555 RANCHO VISTA ROAD N/A 13 ENVIROSTORTEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION S118756754 TC5028780.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Angela GarciaProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: .5Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 33820013Facility ID: SCH: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/17/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/31/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/28/2004Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2004Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/04/2002Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/25/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION (Continued) S118756754 TC5028780.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/04/2002Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 06/25/2002Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820016Alias Name: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 33820013Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404544Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404350Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404340Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110021580154Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 955020001Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-TEMECULA VLY HS EXPAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-TEMECULA VLY HI ADDTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY USD-PRPSD TME VLY HS ADDAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITIONAlias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIED, No Contaminants foundPotential COC: * EDUCATIONAL SERVICESPast Use: 955020001APN: -117.1161Longitude: 33.50140Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 06/04/2002Status Date: No Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 28Senate: 75Assembly: 404544Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION (Continued) S118756754 TC5028780.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/17/2004Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 05/31/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/28/2004Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/09/2004Completed Date: TEMECULA VALLEY HIGH SCHOOL ADDITION (Continued) S118756754 TC5028780.2s Page 52 ORPHAN SUMMARYCityEDR IDSite NameSite AddressZipDatabase(s)Count: 0 records.NO SITES FOUNDTC5028780.2s Page 53 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5028780.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 04/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 11/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management System SEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites, and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list was formerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and the sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive TC5028780.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest under the Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP, renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site while it is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removed and archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list the site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, the location is not judged to be potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/11/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists TC5028780.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST: Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report (GEOTRACKER) Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. TC5028780.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. TC5028780.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 10/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 10/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 10/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 09/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 10/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases (GEOTRACKER) Cleanup Program Sites (CPS; also known as Site Cleanups [SC] and formerly known as Spills, Leaks, Investigations, and Cleanups [SLIC] sites) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5028780.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually State and tribal registered storage tank lists FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 07/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/19/2016 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 01/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/07/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 10/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC5028780.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 10/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/17/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 10/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/05/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 07/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/18/2016 Number of Days to Update: 142 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal Brownfields sites BROWNFIELDS: Considered Brownfieds Sites Listing A listing of sites the SWRCB considers to be Brownfields since these are sites have come to them through the MOA Process. Date of Government Version: 01/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-323-7905 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5028780.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned IHS OPEN DUMPS: Open Dumps on Indian Land A listing of all open dumps located on Indian Land in the United States. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/06/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 176 Source: Department of Health & Human Serivces, Indian Health Service Telephone: 301-443-1452 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine Laboratory Register. TC5028780.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 02/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 08/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 03/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Land Disposal sites (Landfills) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 06/12/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing (GEOTRACKER) Military sites (consisting of: Military UST sites; Military Privatized sites; and Military Cleanup sites [formerly known as DoD non UST]) included in GeoTracker. GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 12/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. Date of Government Version: 01/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 02/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: N/A SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. TC5028780.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 01/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 02/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. TC5028780.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 133 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5028780.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 127 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 11/18/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/23/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/08/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/21/2016 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 07/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. TC5028780.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/30/2015 Number of Days to Update: 218 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Biennially INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/14/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 546 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 07/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program DOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. Date of Government Version: 12/23/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-3559 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. TC5028780.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 12/05/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 100 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 08/11/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 02/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database Listing This map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as iron ore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, such as gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States. TC5028780.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/05/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/29/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/18/2008 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database Listing Active Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Team of the USGS. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/08/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/13/2011 Number of Days to Update: 97 Source: USGS Telephone: 703-648-7709 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ABANDONED MINES: Abandoned Mines An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by OSMRE to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). The inventory contains information on the location, type, and extent of AML impacts, as well as, information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The inventory is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Date of Government Version: 03/14/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Interior Telephone: 202-208-2609 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 04/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Listing A complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/03/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/02/2016 Number of Days to Update: 91 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-0527 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History Information ECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2280 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING UXO: Unexploded Ordnance Sites A listing of unexploded ordnance site locations Date of Government Version: 10/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/05/2016 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Defense Telephone: 571-373-0407 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing This listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA Fuels Programs. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 79 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-385-6164 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 12/28/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/28/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 147 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 06/23/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/16/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/12/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2016 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICE: ICE Contains data pertaining to the Permitted Facilities with Inspections / Enforcements sites tracked in Envirostor. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Toxic Subsances Control Telephone: 877-786-9427 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC5028780.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/11/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/26/2017 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 07/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly MINES: Mines Site Location Listing A listing of mine site locations from the Office of Mine Reclamation. Date of Government Version: 09/12/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/14/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-322-1080 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 86 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 11/14/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/15/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 08/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PEST LIC: Pesticide Regulation Licenses Listing A listing of licenses and certificates issued by the Department of Pesticide Regulation. The DPR issues licenses and/or certificates to: Persons and businesses that apply or sell pesticides; Pest control dealers and brokers; Persons who advise on agricultural pesticide applications. Date of Government Version: 12/06/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 87 Source: Department of Pesticide Regulation Telephone: 916-445-4038 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 12/16/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 01/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/14/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies WASTEWATER PITS: Oil Wastewater Pits Listing Water officials discovered that oil producers have been dumping chemical-laden wastewater into hundreds of unlined pits that are operating without proper permits. Inspections completed by the Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board revealed the existence of previously unidentified waste sites. The water board?s review found that more than one-third of the region?s active disposal pits are operating without permission. Date of Government Version: 04/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 67 Source: RWQCB, Central Valley Region Telephone: 559-445-5577 Last EDR Contact: 07/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC5028780.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. TC5028780.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 04/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 04/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/24/2047 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 06/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. TC5028780.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 04/25/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/24/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/12/2017 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/30/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 05/02/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC5028780.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 07/31/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 06/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually GLENN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/03/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 111 Source: Glenn County Air Pollution Control District Telephone: 830-934-6500 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 57 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: TC5028780.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 02/07/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 81 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 03/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 71 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LASSEN COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 01/13/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 101 Source: Lassen County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-251-8528 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: TC5028780.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 115 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. Date of Government Version: 04/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/26/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/13/2016 Number of Days to Update: 68 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 01/17/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/18/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 07/13/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5028780.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 01/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 06/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/04/2017 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-473-6647 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/17/2017 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: TC5028780.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 06/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/09/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/08/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/03/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/18/2017 Number of Days to Update: 99 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 11/04/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 73 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 02/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 08/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 09/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2016 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually PLUMAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Plumas County CUPA Program facilities. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Plumas County Environmental Health Telephone: 530-283-6355 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/18/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 01/19/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 98 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. TC5028780.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/06/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/04/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 127 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 11/08/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/05/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BENITO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 11/30/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/09/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: San Benito County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. Date of Government Version: 12/09/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/13/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/15/2017 Number of Days to Update: 69 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2016 Number of Days to Update: 58 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 02/28/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/02/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 03/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/16/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/02/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: TC5028780.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2017 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 02/22/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/23/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 08/07/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/11/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5028780.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 80 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/22/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 90 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 06/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 51 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/21/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 1 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/15/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list TC5028780.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/23/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 43 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 01/04/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/02/2017 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/09/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly STANISLAUS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/10/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/16/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 85 Source: Stanislaus County Department of Ennvironmental Protection Telephone: 209-525-6751 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 12/02/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/18/2017 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TEHAMA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facilities Date of Government Version: 05/01/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/08/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 93 Source: Tehama County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 530-527-8020 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TRINITY COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/24/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/25/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/09/2017 Number of Days to Update: 106 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 760-352-0381 Last EDR Contact: 07/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TULARE COUNTY: TC5028780.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List Cupa program facilities Date of Government Version: 01/05/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/10/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/25/2017 Number of Days to Update: 104 Source: Tulare County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 559-624-7400 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/20/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 04/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 105 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 12/27/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/27/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2017 Number of Days to Update: 103 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 08/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 09/26/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2017 Number of Days to Update: 89 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 07/24/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/08/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC5028780.2s Page GR-44 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/15/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/14/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/06/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/03/2017 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/29/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/16/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/31/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/23/2017 Number of Days to Update: 112 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 07/27/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 08/18/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/27/2017 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/11/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/27/2017 Number of Days to Update: 107 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 07/10/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/23/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC5028780.2s Page GR-45 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 01/30/2017 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/01/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2017 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 08/03/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/13/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2016 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/22/2016 Number of Days to Update: 123 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 07/17/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/30/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 08/21/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/04/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2016 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/13/2017 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/14/2017 Number of Days to Update: 92 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2017 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/25/2017 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. TC5028780.2s Page GR-46 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5028780.2s Page GR-47 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC5028780.2s Page A-1 geologic strata. of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of the Groundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration. EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 2012Version Date: 5640254 TEMECULA, CASouthwest Map: 2012Version Date: 5636481 PECHANGA, CASoutheast Map: 2012Version Date: 5640928 BACHELOR MOUNTAIN, CANortheast Map: 2012Version Date: 5641304 MURRIETA, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 1186 ft. above sea levelElevation: 3707241.5UTM Y (Meters): 487476.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.134835 - 117˚ 8’ 5.41’’Longitude (West): 33.506376 - 33˚ 30’ 22.95’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES TEMECULA, CA 92592 RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD AND COSMIC DRIVE VACANT LAND TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC5028780.2s Page A-2 should be field verified. on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity Source: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Elevation (ft)Elevation (ft)TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 1186 ft. North South West East10881157117811421105110011091134117111861104110211641152115411711179115712061014102010381076110111261155116712051186118811631219119911701187119211731213General WNWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers). sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic data using site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on other Groundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-3 Not Reported GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table. authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determined flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatory EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. Not found Status: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed under a Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should of groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist the Hydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapMURRIETA NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property FEMA FIRM Flood data06073C0175G FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C3305G FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C3285G FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C2740G Additional Panels in search area:FEMA Source Type FEMA FIRM Flood data06065C2720G Flood Plain Panel at Target Property FEMA Source Type FEMA FLOOD ZONE and bodies of water). Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted. the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, should Surface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-4 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring. Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils. characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumes to rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soil using site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary Groundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 5 9 10 5 8 9 11 6 2 11 2 7 4 1 3 4 3 12 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC5028780.2s Page A-6 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloam59 inches42 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam42 inches25 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: GREENFIELDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data. for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-7 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.3 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam16 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: RAMONASoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sandy loam loamy sand to stratified72 inches59 inches 4 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-8 Max: Min: Min: Max: Not reportedNot reportedvariable59 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Soil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: variableSoil Surface Texture: GULLIED LANDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy74 inches68 inches 4 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.3 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy clay loam68 inches16 inches 3 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-9 Min: 6.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam coarse sandy46 inches35 inches 4 Max: Min: Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reportedcemented35 inches24 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam24 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: ARLINGTONSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 4 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-10 Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: coarse sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HANFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 6 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam coarse sandy loamy sand to stratified59 inches40 inches 3 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam40 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam coarse sandy 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: coarse sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HANFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 5 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-11 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Partially hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HANFORDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 7 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam coarse sandy loamy sand to stratified59 inches40 inches 3 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam40 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam coarse sandy 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-12 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels. Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: GORGONIOSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 8 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam coarse sandy loamy sand to stratified59 inches40 inches 3 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam40 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-13 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: GREENFIELDSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 9 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular fine sand gravelly loamy sand to gravelly loamy stratified59 inches14 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand14 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-14 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: All hydric Excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: gravelly coarse sandSoil Surface Texture: RIVERWASHSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 10 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloam59 inches42 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam42 inches25 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularsandy loam25 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-15 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: textures. moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarse Class B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: loamSoil Surface Texture: RAMONASoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 11 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 gravel. Well-graded Clean Gravels, SOILIS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular gravelly sand sand to gravelly coarse extremely stratified59 inches 5 inches 2 Max: Min: Min: 42 Max: 141 Gravel. Poorly Graded Clean gravels, SOILS, Gravels, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular sand gravelly coarse 5 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-16 > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: LowCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Well drainedSoil Drainage Class: movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures. Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: ARLINGTONSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 12 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clay loam gravelly sandy74 inches68 inches 4 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.3 Min: 1.4 Max: 4 Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy clay loam68 inches16 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.3 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayfine sandy loam16 inches 7 inches 2 Min: 5.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Clayey sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Clayloam 7 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-17 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells. professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming an EDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 6.6 Max: 7.3 Min: 42 Max: 141 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED Sand. Gravel and Fragments, 200), Stone passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam coarse sandy46 inches35 inches 4 Max: Min: Min: 0.42 Max: 1.4 Not reportedNot reportedcemented35 inches24 inches 3 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 4 Max: 14 50%), silt. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED 50%), Lean Clay. limit less than Clays (liquid SOILS, Silts and FINE-GRAINED Soils. 200), Silty passing No. than 35 pct. Materials (more Silt-Claysandy loam24 inches11 inches 2 Min: 6.1 Max: 7.8 Min: 14 Max: 42 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularfine sandy loam11 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC5028780.2s Page A-18 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADW60000015396 D16 1/2 - 1 Mile ESE8603 D14 1/2 - 1 Mile NW7892 13 1/2 - 1 Mile ESECADW60000021365 D12 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWCADW60000028975 C9 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCADW60000035779 B8 1/2 - 1 Mile West8638 2 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000134179 17 1/2 - 1 Mile ESEUSGS40000134173 D15 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUSGS40000134241 11 1/2 - 1 Mile WestUSGS40000134216 10 1/2 - 1 Mile WestUSGS40000134214 C7 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUSGS40000134207 A6 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUSGS40000134206 A5 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUSGS40000134240 B4 1/2 - 1 Mile WSWUSGS40000134204 A3 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWUSGS40000134236 1 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 200 10801120 1 240 1 2 00 1 2001 160 116012001 1 6 0 1 1 6 0 1120 1 200 1 2 0 0 1 2 00 116 0 12 40 1 2 4 0 11 201 2 0 0 1 2 0 0 1200 1 200 1 2 40 1120 1160124 01160 1 2 00 1 2 0 0 1 2 001080 1 1 20 1 1 6 01160 116 0 1160 11 601 1601160 11 601 160 112 0 12401 2 4 0 12 001 2 001200120 012 0011601160 1 1 6 0 1160 1160 1 0401040 10401 0 8 0 1080 10 8 0 1 08 01 0 8 0 10 8 0 10801 0 8 0 1080116 0 1 1 2 0 11 20 1 1 1 201120 1 120 1 1201 1201 1 2 0 112011201 1 2 0 11 2 0 1120 1 1201 280 1 2 4 0 1280120 0 13 201 1 6 0 128 012001200 1200128012 40 12 40 12 4 0 1 2801 2 4 0 1 1601 200 1 1 6 0 11601160 1 1601 2 00 12 1 2001 20012 0 01200 1240 1 240 1 24 0 12 4 01 1601 1 601 2 0 012001200 12001 2 4012 4 0 1 2 41 2 40 12401 240 1240 1 2 4 0 1 2 12 801 2 1 2 8 1 0 8 011201 16 011201160 12 40 12 0 0 12001 16 0 1160 1 1 60 11 60 1200 1200 1 1 201160 11 6 0 10 4 0 1040 1 12011 20 1120 11201 1 2011 200108010801 0801040 1040 104160015601520 1 4 8 0 144 0 1 360 1320 1280 1241200 1 16 011201120 108 0 1 080040 10001 16 0 1200 12 401240 1240 121 2 8 0 12801 1 601160 1 2 0 0 12 0 0 12001 24 0 1 2 4 0 1 2 4 01 240 1 240 1240 12 4 01240 1 240 12012 00012 1 160 CA TC5028780.2s Page A-20 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 170. MG/LFindings:12-JAN-11Sample Collected: RANCHO CALIFORNIAArea Served: 20396Connections:68900Pop Served: Temecula, CA 92589 P.O. Box 9017 Organization That Operates System: Rancho California Water DistrictSystem Name: 3310038System Number: WELL 137 (235)Source Name: 100 Feet (one Second)Precision:333024.0 1170839.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:14District Number: RiversideCounty:3310038040FRDS Number: WATUser ID:08S/03W-01B01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 2 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 8638CA WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1069.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1436424Longitude: 33.5083609Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W01Q001SMonloc name: USGS-333030117083401Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 1 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134236FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-21 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220. MG/LFindings:02-NOV-12Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:09-AUG-12Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220. MG/LFindings:03-MAY-12Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:09-FEB-12Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:02-NOV-11Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:02-NOV-11Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 3.2 UG/LFindings:29-AUG-11Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 16. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: ARSENICChemical: 4.6 UG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.3 MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 8.4 MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 48. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.7 MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 65. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: MAGNESIUMChemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 13. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 37. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 100. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 86. MG/LFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.5Findings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 380. USFindings:17-AUG-11Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-22 TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: ARSENICChemical: 5.6 UG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: FLUORIDE (F) (NATURAL-SOURCE)Chemical: 0.4 MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: SULFATEChemical: 8.9 MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: CHLORIDEChemical: 51. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: POTASSIUMChemical: 1.2 MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: SODIUMChemical: 68. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: CALCIUMChemical: 9.4 MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: HARDNESS (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 27. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: BICARBONATE ALKALINITYChemical: 110. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: ALKALINITY (TOTAL) AS CACO3Chemical: 88. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: PH, LABORATORYChemical: 8.5Findings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: SPECIFIC CONDUCTANCEChemical: 370. USFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 180. MG/LFindings:20-MAY-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:05-FEB-14Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 250. MG/LFindings:07-NOV-13Sample Collected: GROSS ALPHA MDA95Chemical: 1.64 PCI/LFindings:10-SEP-13Sample Collected: GROSS ALPHA COUNTING ERRORChemical: 1.49 PCI/LFindings:10-SEP-13Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 220. MG/LFindings:10-SEP-13Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 200. MG/LFindings:02-MAY-13Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 230. MG/LFindings:10-FEB-13Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 14. MG/LFindings:02-NOV-12Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-23 Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 20Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1070.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1447535Longitude: 33.5039166Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W12B001SMonloc name: USGS-333014117083801Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: A3 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134204FED USGS TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 230. MG/LFindings:02-AUG-16Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 210. MG/LFindings:11-MAY-16Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240. MG/LFindings:10-FEB-16Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 13. MG/LFindings:17-NOV-15Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 240. MG/LFindings:17-NOV-15Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 190. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-15Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 230. MG/LFindings:14-MAY-15Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 110. MG/LFindings:04-FEB-15Sample Collected: CHROMIUM, HEXAVALENTChemical: 2.8 UG/LFindings:12-AUG-14Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:07-AUG-14Sample Collected: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-24 Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 20Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1060.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1455869Longitude: 33.5041944Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W12C001SMonloc name: USGS-333015117084101Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: A5 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134206FED USGS 1968-03-01 41.00 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 822Welldepth:19520101Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1066.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1450313Longitude: 33.5089164Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W01P002SMonloc name: USGS-333032117083901Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: B4 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134240FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-25 Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1461425Longitude: 33.5050277Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W12Z001SMonloc name: USGS-333018117084301Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: C7 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134214FED USGS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:19110101Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 20Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1060.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1455869Longitude: 33.5041944Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W12C002SMonloc name: USGS-333015117084102Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: A6 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134207FED USGS 1967-10-01 44.00 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 53Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-26 CADW60000028975Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Temecula ValleyBasin desc: ’9-5’Basin code: RiversideCounty name: 33County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 08S03W12C001SState well numbe: 335042N1171465W001Site code: -117.1465Longitude: 33.5042Latitude: 28975Objectid: C9 WSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000028975CA WELLS CADW60000035779Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Temecula ValleyBasin desc: ’9-5’Basin code: RiversideCounty name: 33County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’RCWD 466’Local well name: 08S03W01P002SState well numbe: 335089N1171459W001Site code: -117.1459Longitude: 33.5089Latitude: 35779Objectid: B8 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000035779CA WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 20Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1060.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-27 Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1092.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1489204Longitude: 33.5089164Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W01P003SMonloc name: USGS-333032117085301Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 11 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134241FED USGS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 30Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Level or other surveying methodVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: .1Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1058.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1478092Longitude: 33.5055832Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S003W01P001SMonloc name: USGS-333020117084901Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 10 West 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134216FED USGS Map ID Direction Distance Elevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-28 D14 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 8603CA WELLS NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 7.9 MG/LFindings:10-JAN-06Sample Collected: RANCHO CALIFORNIAArea Served: 20396Connections:68900Pop Served: Temecula, CA 92589 P.O. Box 9017 Organization That Operates System: Rancho California Water DistrictSystem Name: 3310038System Number: WELL 128Source Name: 100 Feet (one Second)Precision:333059.0 1170841.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:14District Number: RiversideCounty:3310038032FRDS Number: WATUser ID:07S/03W-36K01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: 13 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 7892CA WELLS CADW60000021365Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Temecula ValleyBasin desc: ’9-5’Basin code: RiversideCounty name: 33County id: UnknownWell use descrip: 6Well use id: ’’Local well name: 08S02W07A001SState well numbe: 334998N1171209W001Site code: -117.1209Longitude: 33.4998Latitude: 21365Objectid: D12 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000021365CA WELLS Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 Not ReportedWellholedepth units: Not ReportedWellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:19270101Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-29 ftWellholedepth units: 604Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 573Welldepth:19260101Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 20Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1143.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1200304Longitude: 33.4997504Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S002W07A001SMonloc name: USGS-332959117070901Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: D15 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134173FED USGS TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 420. MG/LFindings:08-JUN-12Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 430. MG/LFindings:08-MAR-12Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 400. MG/LFindings:08-DEC-11Sample Collected: TOTAL DISSOLVED SOLIDSChemical: 390. MG/LFindings:08-SEP-11Sample Collected: NITRATE (AS NO3)Chemical: 15. MG/LFindings:10-AUG-11Sample Collected: RANCHO CALIFORNIAArea Served: 20396Connections:68900Pop Served: Temecula, CA 92589 P.O. Box 9017 Organization That Operates System: Rancho California Water DistrictSystem Name: 3310038System Number: WELL 216Source Name: 100 Feet (one Second)Precision:332959.0 1170711.0Source Lat/Long: Active RawWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNTStation Type:14District Number: RiversideCounty:3310038064FRDS Number: WATUser ID:08S/02W-07A02 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-30 Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0 ftWellholedepth units: 1010Wellholedepth:Not ReportedWelldepth units: Not ReportedWelldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 10Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 1160.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.1194748Longitude: 33.5003059Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070302Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 008S002W07A002SMonloc name: USGS-333001117070701Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 17 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000134179FED USGS CADW60000015396Site id: Southern Region OfficeDwr region: 80238Dwr region id: Temecula ValleyBasin desc: ’9-5’Basin code: RiversideCounty name: 33County id: ObservationWell use descrip: 1Well use id: ’RCWD 410’Local well name: Not ReportedState well numbe: 334996N1171201W001Site code: -117.120071Longitude: 33.499605Latitude: 15396Objectid: D16 ESE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW60000015396CA WELLS 1967-10-01 107.00 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC5028780.2s Page A-31 0%0%100%1.700 pCi/LBasement 0%0%100%0.450 pCi/LLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.117 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 12 Federal Area Radon Information for RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for RIVERSIDE County: 2 01492592 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic Map Source: U.S. Geological Survey HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data was obtained from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). It depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. It includes the National Flood Hazard Layer (NFHL) which incorporates Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) data and Q3 data from FEMA in areas not covered by NFHL. Source: FEMA Telephone: 877-336-2627 Date of Government Version: 2003, 2015 NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. State Wetlands Data: Wetland Inventory Source: Department of Fish & Game Telephone: 916-445-0411 HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC5028780.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC5028780.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC5028780.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED APPENDIX D: QUALIFICATIONS 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Kevin Bolland Survey Technician Education B.S., Natural Resources Management, Global Environmental Sustainability, Colorado State University Training OSHA 10-Hour Hazardous Materials Shipping and Receiving WMI- Wilderness First Responder and Safety Training DOT- Drivers Training for Class IV vehicles up to 26,000lbs Highlights Knowledge of air, water and property compliance requirements on both state and federal levels 3 years total field experience in various environmental fields Familiarity with Auto CAD, Arc GIS, GPS, and data collection methods Previous experience with QA on compliance testing reports Desire to work in the environmental industry either in Land Use Planning, or Phase I Assessment. Experience Summary Mr. Bolland is currently fulfilling his role within Partner Engineering and Science as a Survey Technician while learning many of the skills needed in order to be a well-rounded environmental scientist or land use planner. His responsibilities include supporting and assisting party chiefs with project quality and accuracy, communication with clients and others on job sites, and the ability to operate surveying equipment. It is Mr. Bolland's duty to maintain the trucks and the equipment that is used in the field. His role will develop over time to include documentation, legal reporting, and increased client relations. Familiarity with requirements for successful completion of ALTA surveys, design surveys, and construction staking is required for his position. Mr. Bolland’s other relevant project experience in Air Quality Compliance and his volunteer experience have primarily involved field work. However, QA on air quality compliance reports, and work with Auto CAD have also been regularly involved with his work. Aside from Air Quality Compliance testing, permitting and surveying, many of his volunteer efforts have been oriented towards environmental awareness, outreach, and education. Work experience with the Department of Fish and Wildlife, the Newport Back Bay Science Center, and his assistance with environmentally focused outreach projects in Thailand have all been focused on sustainable environmental efforts. While working towards his degree, Mr. Bolland worked with graduate students on environmental restoration projects, environmental education and public outreach surrounding the water use in the central plains, and dendrochronology studies of the central Rocky Mountains. All of his work experience has led him towards a well-rounded awareness of environmental issues and an interest in land use planning. Project Experience Chevron Oil Refinery Air Quality Compliance Testing. As part of a two man team on an AQMD mandated air quality compliance testing cycle, Mr. Bolland was responsible for all data collection related to the emissions of large scale process units covering the entire refinery and much of the calibration equipment found in the CEMS shelters. Activities included maintaining analyzers, assembling other testing equipment, and collecting air samples directly from the point source on stack platforms. Proper safe use of equipment and DOT regulated vehicles, Hazardous chemicals, and heavy equipment was required on a daily basis. Kevin Bolland 2 | P a g e Included with the technical analysis of data collected from the process units was the required knowledge of Microsoft programs and their applications for the purpose of making accurate calculations. Modesto Irrigation District Natural Gas Fired Power Plant Compliance Testing. As part of a two man team on a USEPA mandated particulate compliance and catalyst condition assessment, Mr. Bolland was responsible for all data collection, equipment monitoring, sample system maintenance, and field testing. His ability to operate man-lifts, emissions sample systems, and CEMS probes on a schedule provided the MID power plant with valuable data regarding the operational efficiency of their turbines and resulted in data that proved their compliance with EPA specifications and using correct testing methods. Thermoelectrico de Mexicalli Compliance Testing. As part of a two man team, Mr. Bolland traveled to Mexicalli, Mexico to perform compliance testing on multiple natural gas fired turbines. His duties included driving DOT compliant vehicles to and from the job site over the border, cataloging and maintaining all of the required testing equipment and tools for the job, and performing all of the data collection up on stack platforms and inside CEMS shelters. His role was crucial for the position as he provided valuable support for the project leader and the engineers before, during and after the testing. Chevron Oil Refienry Report Auditing and QA. Mr. Bolland provided assistance with the submission process of reports to the AQMD by performing Quality Assurance on documents and data collected from field testing efforts. It was Mr. Bolland's responsibility to maintain awareness of proper testing procedures for Rule 219 CO testing, as well as cross-species air quality compliance tests and ensure that all of the necessary documentation was accurate and included in reports. His knowledge of AQMD and EPA regulations as well as field testing methods and Microsoft products was essential in order to provide fully accurate finished products. Aliso Viejo Apartment Construction Staking. In support of the party chief, Mr. Bolland provides assistance with the translation of engineering plans to accurately layout the location of future construction efforts. Working with the party chief, the site superintendent, heavy equipment operators, and other construction workers requires good communication skills and knowledge of conventional surveying methods, GPS, and other equipment operation. His support of the party chief ensures the accurate completion of construction efforts on schedule. Contact kbolland@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Joel Redding Project Manager Education B.A. Geography, California State University Fresno Training OSHA 24-Hour Health and Safety Training Highlights 11 years of experience in environmental consulting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) Environmental Transaction Screens Experience Summary Mr. Redding serves as a Project Manager for Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner), overseeing and managing all aspects of multi-scope projects including Phase I ESAs in accordance with EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), Property Condition Assessments (PCAs), Zoning Reports, and Seismic Assessments. Mr. Redding has over eleven years of project experience in the environmental consulting industry. Mr. Redding is familiar with all aspects of Due Diligence Property Assessments and the needs and requirements of a varied number of reporting standards, including ASTM E1527-13, EPA’s All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI), The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA), and customized client formats and scopes. Mr. Redding has performed and supervised over 1,000 ESAs and customized environmental assessments of a variety of properties including multi-family residential, hospitality, commercial office buildings, shopping centers, multi-tenant commercial complexes, industrial warehouses, manufacturing facilities, dry cleaning plants, gasoline service stations, automotive repair and body shops, medical facilities, food processing facilities, and agricultural properties. Project Experience Junior College Campus and Historical Military and Medical Hospital, Modesto, CA. Mr. Redding prepared a Phase I ESA on a junior college campus in Modesto, the site of a historical World War II era military hospital and subsequent State-run hospital. Multiple recognized environmental conditions (RECs) were identified related to current and historical uses including vehicle and facilities maintenance, underground and aboveground fueling facilities, domestic wastewater treatment systems and septic systems, and asbestos and lead-based paint issues. 2,500-Acre Agricultural Property, Maricopa, CA. Mr. Redding prepared a Phase I ESA on a large agricultural property within an active oil and gas production area. Multiple RECs were identified related to oil and gas well development, oil and gas production, subsurface oil and gas pipelines, aboveground fuel storage, and agricultural chemical use, storage, and application. Printed Circuit Board Manufacturing Facility, Redwood City, CA. Mr. Redding prepared a Phase I ESA on a printed circuit board manufacturing facility. Multiple RECs were identified related to electroplating, etching, silk screening, chemical storage, and hazardous waste generation, storage, and treatment operations. Joel Redding 2 | P a g e 10-Site Residential Portfolio, Central CA. Managed a multi-million dollar acquisition project consisting of Phase ESAs of ten, large-acreage, rural agricultural properties throughout Central California for a residential developer. Duties included managing, performing, and reviewing Phase I ESAs. 25-Site Grocery Chain Portfolio, OR and CA. Managed a multi-million dollar rehabilitation financing project consisting of Phase I ESAs of 25 grocery store properties throughout the State of Oregon and Northern California. Duties included managing, performing, and reviewing Phase I ESAs. 16-Site Multi-Family Residential Portfolio, FL. Managed a multi-million dollar acquisition project consisting of 16, multi-story apartment buildings in Florida. Duties included managing and reviewing Phase I ESAs. Contact jredding@partneresi.com 800-419-4923 www.PARTNEResi.com Cody Taylor, Principal National Client Manager Education B.A., Environmental Analysis and Criminal Justice, University of California Irvine Hazardous Materials Management Certificate Courses, University of California Irvine Registrations OSHA 40-Hour Hazwoper OSHA 8-Hour Hazwoper Refreshers ASTM Technical and Professional Training Highlights 20 years of experience in national environmental due diligence consulting Phase I Environmental Site Assessments Phase II Subsurface Soil/Soil Gas Investigations Property Condition Assessments Experience Summary Mr. Taylor is Principal and National Client Manager with significant environmental and due diligence engineering experience in all states with specialized geographical experience in the Pacific West/Northwest. His responsibilities include full-phase environmental consulting, national client management, multi-scope contract negotiation/execution, portfolio project management, and technical report quality control. Mr. Taylor’s regional and national expertise compliments the wide variety of Partner projects and client types including national and local lending institutions, asset management/investment groups, developers, and commercial real estate professionals. Mr. Taylor has 20 years of experience in national environmental due diligence consulting including Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Phase II Subsurface Soil/Soil Gas Investigations, Property Condition Assessments, Seismic Evaluations, Asbestos, Lead-Paint, and Radon Surveys, ALTA Surveys, Geotechnical Investigations, MEP Special Inspections, Energy Evaluations, and Construction Monitoring. Mr. Taylor has assessed/managed over 15,000 commercial real estate transactions throughout his professional career including several multi-million dollar asset portfolios consisting of a 29-site commercial office property acquisition, two 1,200-site cellular tower transactions, a 25-site regional grocery-store chain evaluation, a 10-site residential development acquisition, and a 16-site multi-family apartment building acquisition. These transactions have included some or all of Partner’s core engineering due diligence services described above. Mr. Taylor routinely manages national asset/developer clients to evaluate the environmental and structural risks associated with commercial/industrial properties prior to acquisition. These risks may be associated with past hazardous materials use (i.e., gasoline stations, dry cleaners) which require historical research combined with subsurface evaluations to assess for contamination that could devaluate the property or create a human health concern to occupants or construction workers; evaluate for asbestos, lead-based paint, and radon to determine the need for abatement or venting systems; evaluate the structural integrity of the building and assess for seismic retrofit; evaluate the roof, mechanical, electrical, plumbing systems (i.e., elevators, HVAC systems, sewer); evaluate for American Disabilities Act (ADA) deficiencies (i.e., ramps, railings, access); survey the property boundaries (i.e., ALTA Surveys); evaluate the Cody Taylor, Principal 2 | P a g e subsurface conditions for construction suitability (i.e., Geotechnical Investigations); and conduct energy studies of the site building to meet with current requirements and systems efficiencies. Project Experience Philadelphia Commercial Office Portfolio. A $186 million dollar acquisition project consisting of 29, multi- story commercial office buildings and included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Property Condition Assessments with special inspections of HVAC systems, elevators, and roofing systems. Multiple inspectors were coordinated and dispatched to each site within a two-week report completion timeline. Special inspection findings and related repair costs were cross-calculated with generalist inspection reporting and incorporated into the Property Condition Assessment spreadsheets for client/lender review. The acquisition was successful and exemplified Mr. Taylor’s project management and negotiation skills, coordination of several in-house engineering professionals and subcontracted elevator consultants as well as Partner’s responsiveness and expertise of client/lender’s expedited timeline. National Cellular Tower Portfolios. Two multi-million dollar acquisition projects consisting of over 2,400 cellular towers located throughout the United States which included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments. Multiple national inspectors were dispatched to each mountain-top tower within each state. The inspections incorporated the use of guides and four-wheel drive vehicles (primarily Jeeps) to visually inspect each tower. The acquisition project was successful and exemplified Mr. Taylor’s project management skills, coordination of dozens of national inspectors, quality control reviews, and responsiveness to client’s timeline. Oregon Grocery Chain Portfolio. A multi-million dollar rehabilitation financing project consisting of 25 grocery store properties throughout the State of Oregon and included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and ALTA Surveys. Multiple inspectors were dispatched to each site within a two-week turnaround. The financing project was successful and the project exemplified Mr. Taylor’s negotiation/client management skills, coordination of inspections, quality control and completion of timely reports as well as the responsiveness and professional acumen of Partner’s Engineering Team. Central California Residential Portfolio. A multi-million dollar acquisition project consisting of 10, large- acreage, rural agricultural properties throughout Central California for a residential developer which included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Phase II Subsurface Investigations of former underground storage tanks, burn pits, and residual agricultural herbicides/pesticides from past orchard cultivation. The Phase II investigations included ground penetrating radar (GPR), subsurface soil sampling utilizing a hollow-stem auger drill rig, and surface soil sampling in accordance with the Cal EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control protocol. Results of the investigations revealed no evidence of underground storage tanks or former tanks pits, and no detectable concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons or agricultural chemicals. The acquisition was successful and the project exemplified Mr. Taylor’s negotiation/client management skills, coordination of inspections, quality control and completion of timely reports as well as the responsiveness and professional acumen of Partner’s Engineering Team. Florida Apartment Portfolio. A multi-million dollar acquisition project consisting of 16, multi-story apartment buildings in Florida which included Phase I Environmental Site Assessments and Property Condition Assessments. Multiple inspectors were dispatched to each site to complete the reports within a two-week timeline. The acquisition was successful and the project exemplified Mr. Taylor’s Cody Taylor, Principal 3 | P a g e negotiation/client management skills, coordination of inspections, quality control and completion of timely reports as well as the responsiveness and professional acumen of Partner’s Engineering Team. Affiliations ASTM Member No. 000216930 Environmental Bankers Association Risk Management Association, Director National Association of Development Companies Northwest Environmental Business Council Commercial Brokers Association Speaking “Regulations in Lending”, Risk Management Association, Fresno, CA. Risk Tolerance and Environmental Regulation for Commercial Bankers “Water in the Central Valley”, Fresno, CA. Contaminated Sites and Environmental Remediation of Commercial Properties Contact CTaylor@partneresi.com Appendix D – Water and Sewer Letters Appendix E – Focused Traffic Analysis and Vehicle Miles Traveled Screening Analysis Rendezvous – Phase II (Formerly known as Temecula Village Apartments – Phase II) FOCUSED TRAFFIC ANALYSIS CITY OF TEMECULA PREPARED BY: Aric Evatt, PTP aevatt@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x204 Charlene So, PE cso@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x222 Robert Vu rvu@urbanxroads.com (949) 660-1994 x238 OCTOBER 10, 2019 (REVISED NOVEMBER 9, 2020) 12799-03 TA Report REV Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................. I APPENDICES ........................................................................................................................................ III LIST OF EXHIBITS .................................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................................................. VII THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK ............................................................................................ VIII LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS ............................................................................................................. IX 1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Summary of Findings ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Project Overview ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Analysis Scenarios ......................................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Study Area ..................................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 Analysis Findings ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.6 Recommendations ........................................................................................................................ 8 2 METHODOLOGIES .................................................................................................................... 11 2.1 Level of Service ........................................................................................................................... 11 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis .................................................................................................... 11 2.3 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis Methodology ............................................................................. 13 2.4 Minimum Acceptable Levels of Service (LOS) and Intersection Deficiency Criteria ................... 14 2.5 Thresholds of Significance........................................................................................................... 14 3 AREA CONDITIONS ................................................................................................................... 15 3.1 Existing Circulation Network ....................................................................................................... 15 3.2 City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element ................................................................... 15 3.3 Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities ................................................................................................. 19 3.4 Transit Service ............................................................................................................................. 19 3.5 Existing (2019) Traffic Counts ..................................................................................................... 19 3.6 Intersection Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 23 3.7 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis .................................................................................................. 23 4 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC .................................................................................................... 27 4.1 Project Trip Generation ............................................................................................................... 27 4.2 Project Trip Distribution .............................................................................................................. 30 4.3 Modal Split .................................................................................................................................. 30 4.4 Project Trip Assignment .............................................................................................................. 30 4.5 Background Traffic ...................................................................................................................... 30 4.6 Cumulative Development Traffic ................................................................................................ 34 5 E+P TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................................................ 39 5.1 Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................. 39 5.2 Existing plus Project Traffic Volume Forecasts ........................................................................... 39 5.3 Intersection Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 39 5.4 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis .................................................................................................. 39 5.5 Deficiencies and Recommended Improvements ........................................................................ 43 6 EA AND EAP (2024) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 45 6.1 Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................. 45 6.2 EA (2024) Traffic Volume Forecasts ............................................................................................ 45 6.3 EAP (2024) Traffic Volume Forecasts .......................................................................................... 45 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV ii 6.4 Intersection Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 45 6.5 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis .................................................................................................. 51 6.6 Deficiencies and Recommended Improvements ........................................................................ 51 7 EAPC (2024) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS ........................................................................................... 53 7.1 Roadway Improvements ............................................................................................................. 53 7.2 EAPC (2024) Traffic Volume Forecasts ........................................................................................ 53 7.3 Intersection Operations Analysis ................................................................................................ 53 7.4 Traffic Signal Warrants Analysis .................................................................................................. 57 7.5 Deficiencies and Recommended Improvements ........................................................................ 57 8 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS ....................................................................... 59 8.1 City of Temecula Development Impact Fee Program ................................................................. 59 8.2 Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) Program .......................................................... 59 8.3 Fair Share Contribution ............................................................................................................... 60 9 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................. 61 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV iii APPENDICES APPENDIX 1.1: APPROVED TRAFFIC STUDY SCOPING AGREEMENT APPENDIX 1.2: FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS APPROVAL APPENDIX 1.3: SITE ADJACENT QUEUING WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 3.1: EXISTING TRAFFIC COUNTS – AUGUST 2019 APPENDIX 3.2: EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 3.3: EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 5.1: E+P CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 5.2: E+P CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.1: EA (2024) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.2: EAP (2024) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.3: EA (2024) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 6.4: EAP (2024) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.1: EAPC (2024) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.2: EAPC (2024) CONDITIONS TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS WORKSHEETS Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV iv This Page Intentionally Left Blank Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV v LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 1-1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN .................................................................................................. 2 EXHIBIT 1-2: LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................ 5 EXHIBIT 1-3: SUMMARY OF DEFICIENT INTERSECTIONS BY ANALYSIS SCENARIO .................................. 7 EXHIBIT 1-4: SITE ADJACENT ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONS ................................. 9 EXHIBIT 3-1: EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS ....................... 16 EXHIBIT 3-2: CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT .......................................... 17 EXHIBIT 3-3: CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS ................................... 18 EXHIBIT 3-4: CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN TRAILS AND BIKEWAYS ........................................... 20 EXHIBIT 3-5: EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES ................................................................................... 21 EXHIBIT 3-6: EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES ............................................................................................ 22 EXHIBIT 3-7: EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES ............................................................................... 24 EXHIBIT 3-8: EXISTING (2019) SUMMARY OF LOS ............................................................................... 25 EXHIBIT 4-1: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION .......................................................................................... 32 EXHIBIT 4-2: PROJECT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................. 33 EXHIBIT 4-3: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LOCATION MAP ............................................................... 35 EXHIBIT 4-4: CUMULATIVE ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES .......................................................................... 36 EXHIBIT 5-1: E+P TRAFFIC VOLUMES ................................................................................................... 40 EXHIBIT 5-2: E+P SUMMARY OF LOS ................................................................................................... 41 EXHIBIT 6-1: EA (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES ......................................................................................... 46 EXHIBIT 6-2: EAP (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES ....................................................................................... 47 EXHIBIT 6-3: EA (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS .......................................................................................... 48 EXHIBIT 6-4: EAP (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS ........................................................................................ 49 EXHIBIT 7-1: EAPC (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES ..................................................................................... 54 EXHIBIT 7-2: EAPC (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS ...................................................................................... 55 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV vi This Page Intentionally Left Blank Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV vii LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ................................................................................. 4 TABLE 2-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS THRESHOLDS ................................................................... 12 TABLE 2-2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS THRESHOLDS .............................................................. 13 TABLE 2-3: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ............................................................ 13 TABLE 3-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS ............................................ 26 TABLE 4-1: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY: PROPOSED PROJECT ......................................................... 28 TABLE 4-2: TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY: CURRENTLY ADOPTED LAND USE ...................................... 29 TABLE 4-3: TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON ..................................................................................... 31 TABLE 4-4: CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT LAND USE SUMMARY ......................................................... 37 TABLE 5-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR E+P CONDITIONS ................................................................ 42 TABLE 6-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EA AND EAP (2024) CONDITIONS ........................................ 50 TABLE 7-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS FOR EAPC (2024) CONDITIONS................................................... 56 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV viii This Page Intentionally Left Blank Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV ix LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS (1) Reference ADT Average Daily Traffic CA MUTCD California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices Caltrans California Department of Transportation CMP Congestion Management Program DIF Development Impact Fee E+P Existing Plus Project EA Existing Plus Ambient Growth EAP Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project EAPC Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative HCM Highway Capacity Manual ITE Institute of Transportation Engineers LOS Level of Service PDO Planned Development Overlay PHF Peak Hour Factor Project Rendezvous – Phase II RCTC Riverside County Transportation Commission RTA Riverside Transport Authority TA Traffic Analysis TUMF Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee v/c Volume to Capacity WRCOG Western Riverside Council of Governments Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV x This Page Intentionally Left Blank Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 1 1 INTRODUCTION This report presents the results of the traffic analysis (TA) for the proposed Rendezvous – Phase II (“Project”), which is located south of Rancho California Road and west of Cosmic Drive in the City of Temecula, as shown on Exhibit 1-1. The purpose of this TA is to evaluate the potential circulation system deficiencies that may result from the development of the proposed Project, and to recommend improvements to achieve acceptable circulation system operational conditions. As directed by City of Temecula staff, this traffic study has been prepared in accordance with the City of Temecula Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, and consultation with City staff during the scoping process. (1) (2) The approved Project Traffic Study Scoping agreement is provided in Appendix 1.1 of this TA. 1.1 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS The Project is proposing to construct the following improvements as design features in conjunction with development of the site. Recommendation 1.1 – Driveway 1 & Rancho California Road (#3) – The following improvements are necessary to accommodate site access: • Project to install a traffic signal and construct a northbound left turn lane and shared through- right turn lane. The northbound approach will have a wide median to divide the two directions of travel. Recommendation 2.1 – Rancho California Road – Rancho California Road is an east-west oriented roadway located at the northern Project boundary. Rancho California Road appears to be constructed to its ultimate half-section along the Project’s frontage on the south side as a Principal Arterial (110-foot right-of-way) in compliance with applicable City of Temecula standards. However, the Project should construct sidewalk improvements and additional curb and gutter improvements to accommodate the proposed access points. Additional details are provided in Section 1.6 Recommendations of this report. 1 727'TO TEMEC U L A VILLAGE (P H A S E I )N12799 - siteplan.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisEXHIBIT 1-1: PRELIMINARY SITE PLANDWY. 1 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.2 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 3 1.2 PROJECT OVERVIEW Exhibit 1-1 illustrates the preliminary site plan. The traffic analysis assumes the Project is to include the development of 142 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units. However, the current site plan for the Project reflects 134 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units (a reduction of 8 dwelling units). The higher dwelling unit count has been evaluated for the purposes of this traffic analysis in an effort to conduct a conservative analysis and provides flexibility in the event any minor changes occur as part of the final design. It is anticipated that the Project would be developed in a single phase with an anticipated Opening Year of 2024. For the purpose of this analysis, the following driveway will provide access to the Project site: • Driveway 1 via Rancho California Road – Full Access It should be noted that the City of Temecula Fire Department approved the single access point on Rancho California Road to the proposed Project. The approval is provided in Appendix 1.2. Regional access to the Project site is available from the I-15 Freeway and Rancho California Road interchange. Trips generated by the Project’s proposed land uses have been estimated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) for Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise, 2 floors) (ITE Land Use Code 220) and Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise, 3 floors) (ITE Land Use Code 221). (3) The Project generates a total of 792 trip-ends per day on a typical weekday with approximately 52 AM peak hour trips and 64 PM peak hour trips. The assumptions and methods used to estimate the Project’s trip generation characteristics are discussed in greater detail in Section 4.1 Project Trip Generation of this report. 1.3 ANALYSIS SCENARIOS For the purposes of this traffic study, potential deficiencies to traffic and circulation have been assessed for each of the following conditions: • Existing (2019) Conditions • Existing Plus Project (E+P) Conditions • Existing Plus Ambient Growth (EA) (2024) • Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project (EAP) (2024) • Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project Plus Cumulative Projects (EAPC) (2024) 1.3.1 EXISTING (2019) CONDITIONS Information for Existing (2019) conditions is disclosed to represent the baseline traffic conditions as they existed at the time this report was prepared. 1.3.2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS The Existing Plus Project (E+P) analysis determines circulation system deficiencies that would occur on the existing roadway system in the scenario of the Project being placed upon Existing 3 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 4 conditions. The E+P analysis is intended to identify the project-specific traffic deficiencies associated solely with the development of the proposed Project based on a comparison of the E+P traffic conditions to Existing (2019) conditions. 1.3.3 EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH AND EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT (2024) CONDITIONS The EA and EAP (2024) conditions analyses determines the traffic deficiencies based on a comparison of the EAP (2024) traffic conditions to EA (2024) traffic conditions. To account for background traffic growth, an ambient growth factor of 10.41% to Existing traffic volumes is included for EA and EAP (2024) traffic conditions (2% per year, compounded annually over 5 years). The EAP analysis is intended to identify “Opening Year” deficiencies associated with the development of the proposed Project based on the expected background growth within the study area. 1.3.4 EXISTING PLUS AMBIENT GROWTH PLUS PROJECT PLUS CUMULATIVE (2024) CONDITIONS The EAPC (2024) traffic conditions analysis determines the potential near-term cumulative circulation system deficiencies. To account for background traffic growth, traffic associated with other known cumulative development projects in conjunction with an ambient growth factor of 10.41% from Existing conditions are included for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions. 1.4 STUDY AREA To ensure that this TA satisfies the City of Temecula’s traffic study requirements, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared a traffic study scoping package for review by City staff prior to the preparation of this report. The Agreement provides an outline of the Project study area, trip generation, trip distribution, and analysis methodology and is included in Appendix 1.1. The following 3 study area intersections shown on Exhibit 1-2 and listed in Table 1-1 were selected for this TA based on consultation with City of Temecula staff and have generally been selected based on the “50 peak hour trip” criterion. The “50 peak hour trip” criterion is consistent with the methodology employed by the City of Temecula and County of Riverside, and generally represents a minimum number of trips at which a typical intersection would have the potential to be substantively deficient with a given development proposal. Although each intersection may have unique operating characteristics, this traffic engineering rule of thumb is a widely utilized tool for estimating a potential effected area (i.e., study area). TABLE 1-1: INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Intersection Location Jurisdiction CMP? 1 Ynez Rd. & Rancho California Rd.* Temecula No 2 Moraga Rd. & Rancho California Rd. Temecula No 3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd. Temecula No * Project contributes fewer than 50 peak hour trips to this intersection. Added at the request of City staff. 4 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - locmap.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisEXHIBIT 1-2: LOCATION MAP= EXISTING INTERSECTION ANALYSIS LOCATIONLEGEND:013DWY. 1 25 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 6 The intent of a Congestion Management Program (CMP) is to more directly link land use, transportation, and air quality, thereby prompting reasonable growth management programs that will effectively utilize new transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related deficiencies, and improve air quality. The County of Riverside CMP became effective with the passage of Proposition 111 in 1990 and updated most recently updated in 2011. The Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) adopted the 2011 CMP for the County of Riverside in December 2011. (4) None of the study area intersections are identified as CMP facilities in the Riverside County CMP. 1.5 ANALYSIS FINDINGS This section provides a summary of analysis results for E+P, EA (2024), EAP (2024), and EAPC (2024) traffic conditions. A summary of level of service (LOS) results for all analysis scenarios is presented on Exhibit 1-3. 1.5.1 E+P CONDITIONS The intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours, consistent with Existing (2019) traffic conditions. However, the Project is anticipated to increase the delay by less than 2.0 seconds and contributes less than 50 peak hour trips to this intersection. Consistent with the City of Temecula traffic analysis guidelines, the deficiency is considered less than significant. As such, no improvements have been recommended. The Project will install a traffic signal at Driveway 1 on Rancho California Road as part of the Project, as such, the Existing deficiency at this location is eliminated. 1.5.2 EA (2024) CONDITIONS The intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours under EA (2024) traffic conditions. 1.5.3 EAP (2024) CONDITIONS The intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours with the addition of Project traffic. However, the Project is anticipated to increase the delay by less than 2.0 seconds and the Project contributes less than 50 peak hour trips to this intersection. Consistent with the City of Temecula traffic analysis guidelines, the deficiency is considered less than significant. As such, no improvements have been recommended. 1.5.4 EAPC (2024) CONDITIONS The intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to continue to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours. However, the Project contributes less than 50 peak hour trips to this intersection. As such, the deficiency is considered less than significant, and no improvements have been recommended. 6 7 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 8 1.6 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations are based on the improvements needed to accommodate site access. Exhibit 1-4 shows the site adjacent recommendations. Recommendation 1.1 – Driveway 1 & Rancho California Road (#3) – The following improvements are necessary to accommodate site access: • Project to install a traffic signal and construct a northbound left turn lane and shared through- right turn lane. The northbound approach will have a wide median to divide the two directions of travel. Recommendation 2.1 – Rancho California Road – Rancho California Road is an east-west oriented roadway located at the northern Project boundary. Rancho California Road appears to be constructed to its ultimate half-section along the Project’s frontage on the south side as a Principal Arterial (110-foot right-of-way) in compliance with applicable City of Temecula standards. However, the Project should construct sidewalk improvements and additional curb and gutter improvements to accommodate the proposed Project driveways. Wherever necessary, roadways adjacent to the Project, site access points and site-adjacent intersections will be constructed to be consistent with the identified roadway classifications and respective cross-sections in the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element. On-site traffic signing and striping should be implemented in conjunction with detailed construction plans for the Project site. 8 TO TEMEC U L A VILLAGE (P H A S E I )N12799 - recs.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.EXHIBIT 1-4: SITE ADJACENT ROADWAY AND SITE ACCESS RECOMMENDATIONSON-SITE TRAFFIC SIGNING AND STRIPING SHOULD BEIMPLEMENTED IN CONJUNCTION WITH DETAILEDCONSTRUCTION PLANS FOR THE PROJECT SITE.RANCHO CALIFORNIA ROAD IS AN EAST-WEST ORIENTED ROADWAYLOCATED ON THE PROJECT'S NORTHERN BOUNDARY. RANCHOCALIFORNIA ROAD APPEARS TO BE CONSTRUCTED TO ITS ULTIMATEHALF-SECTION ALONG THE PROJECT'S FRONTAGE ON THE SOUTH SIDEAS A PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (110-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY) IN COMPLIANCEWITH THE APPLICABLE CITY OF TEMECULA STANDARDS. HOWEVER, THEPROJECT SHOULD CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS ANDADDITIONAL CURB AND GUTTER IMPROVEMENTS TO ACCOMMODATETHE PROPOSED PROJECT DRIVEWAYS.= TRAFFIC SIGNALLEGEND:= DEFACTO RIGHT TURNDEF= MINIMUM TURN POCKET LENGTH150'= EXISTING LANE= LANE IMPROVEMENT= PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL (110-FOOT R.O.W.)SIGHT DISTANCE AT EACH PROJECT ACCESS POINTSHOULD BE REVIEWED WITH RESPECT TO STANDARDCALTRANS AND CITY OF TEMECULA SIGHT DISTANCESTANDARDS AT THE TIME OF PREPARATION OFFINAL GRADING, LANDSCAPE AND STREETIMPROVEMENT PLANS.180'DEF95'9 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 10 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 10 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 11 2 METHODOLOGIES This section of the report presents the methodologies used to perform the traffic analyses summarized in this report. The methodologies described are generally consistent with City of Temecula traffic study guidelines. 2.1 LEVEL OF SERVICE Traffic operations of roadway facilities are described using the term "Level of Service" (LOS). LOS is a qualitative description of traffic flow based on several factors such as speed, travel time, delay, and freedom to maneuver. Six levels are typically defined ranging from LOS A, representing completely free-flow conditions, to LOS F, representing breakdown in flow resulting in stop-and-go conditions. LOS E represents operations at or near capacity, an unstable level where vehicles are operating with the minimum spacing for maintaining uniform flow. 2.2 INTERSECTION CAPACITY ANALYSIS The definitions of LOS for interrupted traffic flow (flow restrained by the existence of traffic signals and other traffic control devices) differ slightly depending on the type of traffic control. The LOS is typically dependent on the quality of traffic flow at the intersections along a roadway. The Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition, methodology expresses the LOS at an intersection in terms of delay time for the various intersection approaches. (5) The HCM uses different procedures depending on the type of intersection control. 2.2.1 SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The City of Temecula requires signalized intersection operations analysis based on the methodology described in the HCM. (5) Intersection LOS operations are based on an intersection’s average control delay. Control delay includes initial deceleration delay, queue move-up time, stopped delay, and final acceleration delay. For signalized intersections LOS is directly related to the average control delay per vehicle and is correlated to a LOS designation as described in Table 2-1. 11 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 12 TABLE 2-1: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS THRESHOLDS Description Average Control Delay (Seconds), V/C ≤ 1.0 Level of Service, V/C ≤ 1.0 Level of Service, V/C > 1.0 Operations with very low delay occurring with favorable progression and/or short cycle length. 0 to 10.00 A F Operations with low delay occurring with good progression and/or short cycle lengths. 10.01 to 20.00 B F Operations with average delays resulting from fair progression and/or longer cycle lengths. Individual cycle failures begin to appear. 20.01 to 35.00 C F Operations with longer delays due to a combination of unfavorable progression, long cycle lengths, or high V/C ratios. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. 35.01 to 55.00 D F Operations with high delay values indicating poor progression, long cycle lengths, and high V/C ratios. Individual cycle failures are frequent occurrences. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. 55.01 to 80.00 E F Operation with delays unacceptable to most drivers occurring due to over saturation, poor progression, or very long cycle lengths. 80.01 and up F F Source: HCM (6th Edition) Consistent with City of Temecula traffic analysis guidelines, a saturation flow rate of 1800 has been utilized for all study area intersections. The traffic modeling and signal timing optimization software package Synchro (Version 10) has been utilized to analyze signalized intersections. The peak hour traffic volumes have been adjusted using a peak hour factor (PHF) to reflect peak 15- minute volumes. Common practice for LOS analysis is to use a peak 15-minute rate of flow. However, flow rates are typically expressed in vehicles per hour. The PHF is the relationship between the peak 15-minute flow rate and the full hourly volume (e.g. PHF = [Hourly Volume] / [4 x Peak 15-minute Flow Rate]). The use of a 15-minute PHF produces a more detailed analysis as compared to analyzing vehicles per hour. Existing PHFs have been used for all near-term analysis scenarios. Per the HCM, PHF values over 0.95 often are indicative of high traffic volumes with capacity constraints on peak hour flows while lower PHF values are indicative of greater variability of flow during the peak hour. (5) 2.2.2 UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS The City of Temecula requires the operations of unsignalized intersections be evaluated using the methodology described in the HCM. (5) The LOS rating is based on the weighted average control delay expressed in seconds per vehicle (see Table 2-2). 12 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 13 TABLE 2-2: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS THRESHOLDS Description Average Control Delay Per Vehicle (Seconds) Level of Service, V/C ≤ 1.0 Level of Service, V/C > 1.0 Little or no delays. 0 to 10.00 A F Short traffic delays. 10.01 to 15.00 B F Average traffic delays. 15.01 to 25.00 C F Long traffic delays. 25.01 to 35.00 D F Very long traffic delays. 35.01 to 50.00 E F Extreme traffic delays with intersection capacity exceeded. > 50.00 F F Source: HCM (6th Edition) At two-way or side-street stop-controlled intersections, LOS is calculated for each controlled movement and for the left turn movement from the major street, as well as for the intersection as a whole. For approaches composed of a single lane, the delay is computed as the average of all movements in that lane. For all-way stop controlled intersections, LOS is computed for the intersection as a whole. 2.3 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS METHODOLOGY The term "signal warrants" refers to the list of established criteria used by Caltrans and other public agencies to quantitatively justify or ascertain the potential need for installation of a traffic signal at an otherwise unsignalized intersection. This TA update uses the signal warrant criteria presented in the latest edition of the Caltrans’ California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CA MUTCD), for all study area intersections. (6) The signal warrant criteria for Existing study area intersections are based upon several factors, including volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic, frequency of accidents, and location of school areas. The CA MUTCD indicates that the installation of a traffic signal should be considered if one or more of the signal warrants are met. (6) Specifically, this TA update utilizes the Peak Hour Volume-based Warrant 3 as the appropriate representative traffic signal warrant analysis for existing traffic conditions. Warrant 3 is appropriate to use for this TA update because it provides specialized warrant criteria for intersections with rural characteristics (e.g. located in communities with populations of less than 10,000 persons or with adjacent major streets operating above 40 miles per hour). For the purposes of this study, the speed limit was the basis for determining whether Urban or Rural warrants were used for a given intersection. As shown in Table 2-3, traffic signal warrant analyses were performed for the following unsignalized study area intersection during the peak weekday conditions wherein the Project is anticipated to contribute the highest trips: TABLE 2-3: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANALYSIS LOCATIONS ID Intersection Location Jurisdiction 3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd. Temecula 13 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 14 The Existing conditions traffic signal warrant analysis is presented in the subsequent section, Section 3 Area Conditions of this report. The traffic signal warrant analyses for future conditions are presented in Section 5 E+P Traffic Conditions, Section 6 EA and EAP (2024) Traffic Conditions, and Section 7 EAPC (2024) Traffic Conditions of this report. It is important to note that a signal warrant defines the minimum condition under which the installation of a traffic signal might be warranted. Meeting this threshold condition does not require that a traffic control signal be installed at a particular location, but rather, that other traffic factors and conditions be evaluated in order to determine whether the signal is truly justified. It should also be noted that signal warrants do not necessarily correlate with LOS. An intersection may satisfy a signal warrant condition and operate at or above acceptable LOS or operate below acceptable LOS and not meet a signal warrant. 2.4 MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS) AND INTERSECTION DEFICIENCY CRITERIA In accordance with the City's General Plan Circulation Element and TA Guidelines, LOS "D" or better shall be maintained at all study area intersections. 2.5 THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The City of Temecula identifies significant deficiencies and required contributions towards deficiencies based on the following: • All study area intersections or study area roadway links that do not achieve the required LOS, shall be reanalyzed using the proposed mitigation measures to determine if the required LOS can be achieved. • If added project traffic causes an increase in delay of 2.0 seconds or more at intersections operating at LOS "E" or "F", it shall be considered a significant deficiency and mitigation measures will be required to reduce the delay to pre-project or acceptable conditions. 14 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 15 3 AREA CONDITIONS This section provides a summary of the existing circulation network, the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Network, and a review of existing peak hour intersection operations and traffic signal warrant analyses. 3.1 EXISTING CIRCULATION NETWORK Pursuant to the agreement with City of Temecula staff (Appendix 1.1), the study area includes a total of 3 existing intersections as shown previously on Exhibit 1-2. Exhibit 3-1 illustrates the study area intersections located near the proposed Project and identifies the number of through traffic lanes for existing roadways and intersection traffic controls. 3.2 CITY OF TEMECULA GENERAL PLAN CIRCULATION ELEMENT As noted previously, the Project site is located within the City of Temecula. The roadway classifications and planned (ultimate) roadway cross-sections of the major roadways within the study area, as identified on the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element, are described subsequently. Exhibit 3-2 shows the City of Temecula General Plan Circulation Element, and Exhibit 3-3 illustrates the City of Temecula General Plan roadway cross-sections. Study area roadways that are classified as an Urban Arterial are identified as having four lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Temecula is classified as an Urban Arterial: • Rancho California Road (between Ynez Road and Old Town Front Street) Study area roadways that are classified as Principal Arterials are identified as having three lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadways within the City of Temecula are classified as a Principal Arterial: • Rancho California Road (between Ynez Road and Margarita Road) • Ynez Road (between Rancho Vista Road and Winchester Road) Study area roadways that are classified as Secondary Arterials are identified as having two lanes of travel in each direction. The following study area roadway within the City of Temecula is classified as a Secondary Arterial: • Moraga Road 15 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - icon.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis13DWY. 1 2EXHIBIT 3-1: EXISTING NUMBER OF THROUGH LANES AND INTERSECTION CONTROLS= TRAFFIC SIGNAL= NUMBER OF LANES= STOP SIGN= DIVIDED= UNDIVIDEDDU4LEGEND:= RIGHT TURN OVERLAPRTO= SPEED LIMIT (MPH)12374D4D2D 4D 4D6D2U 6D8D6D4D123;123;123:123:123:123:1237 1237 123<123<SRTORTO1 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.S23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.RTORTODEFDEF= DEFACTO RIGHT TURNDEF16 17 18 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 19 3.3 BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES The City of Temecula General Plan Trails and Bikeways are shown on Exhibit 3-4. There are currently Class 2 bike lanes along Moraga Road and the Project’s frontage on Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. There are planned Class 2 bike lanes along Ynez Road and Rancho California Road, from Ynez Road to east of Moraga Road. There are also planned multi-use trails along Moraga Road and Rancho California Road, east of Moraga Road. Existing pedestrian facilities within the study area are shown on Exhibit 3-5. Field observations conducted in August 2019 indicate nominal pedestrian and bicycle activity within the study area. 3.4 TRANSIT SERVICE The Riverside Transit Authority (RTA) currently serves the City of Temecula. Transit service is reviewed and updated by RTA periodically to address ridership, budget, and community demand needs. Based on a review of the existing transit routes within the vicinity of the proposed Project, RTA Route 24 currently operates on Rancho California Road and would likely serve the Project site. RTA Route 202 also runs along Rancho California Road and Ynez Road. Existing transit routes in the vicinity of the study area are illustrated on Exhibit 3-6. Changes in land use can affect these periodic adjustments which may lead to either enhanced or reduced service where appropriate. As such, it is recommended that the applicant work in conjunction with RTA to potentially provide additional bus service to the site. 3.5 EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC COUNTS The intersection LOS analysis is based on the traffic volumes observed during the peak hour conditions using traffic count data collected in August 2019. The following peak hours were selected for analysis: • Weekday AM Peak Hour (peak hour between 7:00 AM and 9:00 AM) • Weekday PM Peak Hour (peak hour between 4:00 PM and 6:00 PM) The weekday AM and weekday PM peak hour count data are representative of typical weekday peak hour traffic conditions in the study area. There were no observations made in the field that would indicate atypical traffic conditions on the count dates, such as construction activity or detour routes and near-by schools were in session and operating on normal schedules. The raw manual peak hour turning movement traffic count data sheets are included in Appendix 3.1. 19 20 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - peds.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 2EXHIBIT 3-5: EXISTING PEDESTRIAN FACILITIES12BBBBBBB3LEGEND:B= SIDEWALK= BUS STOP= NO CROSSWALK0= CROSSWALK ON THREE APPROACHES021 MORAGA R D .SITEN12799 - transit.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisRANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.YNEZ R D. DWY. 1 EXHIBIT 3-6: EXISTING TRANSIT ROUTES= RTA ROUTE 202= RTA ROUTE 24LEGEND:B= BUS STOPBBBBBBB22 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 23 Existing weekday Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes are shown on Exhibit 3-7. Where actual 24-hour tube count data was not available, Existing ADT volumes were based upon factored intersection peak hour counts collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. using the following formula for each intersection leg: Weekday PM Peak Hour (Approach Volume + Exit Volume) x 12.45 = Leg Volume A comparison of the PM peak hour and daily traffic volumes of various roadway segments within the study area indicated that the peak-to-daily relationship is approximately 8.03 percent. As such, the above equation utilizing a factor of 12.45 estimates the ADT volumes on the study area roadway segments assuming a peak-to-daily relationship of approximately 8.03 percent (i.e., 1/0.0803 = 12.45) and was assumed to sufficiently estimate ADT volumes for planning-level analyses. Existing weekday AM and weekday PM peak hour intersection volumes are also shown on Exhibit 3-7. 3.6 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS Existing peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2.2 Intersection Capacity Analysis of this report. The intersection operations analysis results are summarized in Table 3-1, which indicates that the following existing study area intersections are currently operating at unacceptable LOS during the peak hours under Existing (2019) traffic conditions: •Ynez Road & Rancho California Road (#1) – LOS E AM and PM peak hours •Driveway 1 & Rancho California Road (#3) – LOS E AM and PM peak hours Consistent with Table 3-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for Existing (2019) traffic conditions is shown on Exhibit 3-8. The intersection operations analysis worksheets are included in Appendix 3.2 of this TA. 3.7 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS Traffic signal warrants for Existing (2019) traffic conditions are based on existing peak hour intersection turning volumes. There are no unsignalized study area intersections that currently warrant a traffic signal for Existing (2019) traffic conditions. Existing (2019) conditions traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 3.3. 23 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis13DWY. 1 231.633.71.8 12.0 33.135.22.1 35.757.134.932.61 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.26(20)24(27)27(45)152(194)28(22)357(258)146(309)575(1302)14(16)39(39)1197(922)131(153)652(489)422(626)81(134)63(173)253(585)398(559)434(733)706(1302)395(624)107(156)1264(880)148(219)17(5)37(33)46(86)699(1479)1313(1018)14(23)= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)= ACTUAL (COUNT-BASED) VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= ESTIMATED VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)10.0EXHIBIT 3-7: EXISTING (2019) TRAFFIC VOLUMES24 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - los.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 EXHIBIT 3-8: EXISTING (2019) SUMMARY OF LOSLEGEND:= LOS E= AM PEAK HOUR = PM PEAK HOUR= LOS A-D= LOS F25 Table 3‐1 Delay2 Traffic Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound (secs.) # Intersection Control 3 L T R L T R L T R L T R AM PM AM PM 1 Ynez Rd. & Rancho California Rd. TS 221222>231>13155.7 71.1 E E 2 Moraga Rd. & Rancho California Rd. TS 110211>13012133.1 34.6 C C 3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd. CSS 00001d12012d46.8 39.7 E E *BOLD = LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements (i.e., unacceptable LOS). 1 When a right turn is designated, the lane can either be striped or unstriped. To function as a right turn lane there must be sufficient width for right turning vehicles to travel outside the through lanes. 2 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections with a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worst individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 3 TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Cross‐Street Stop Level of Service Intersection Analysis for Existing (2019) Conditions L = Left; T = Through; R = Right; > = Right‐Turn Overlap Phasing; d = Defacto Right Turn Lane Intersection Approach Lanes1 26 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 27 4 PROJECTED FUTURE TRAFFIC This section presents the traffic volumes estimated to be generated by the Project’s trip assignment onto the study area roadway network. The traffic analysis assumes the Project is to include the development of 142 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units. However, the current site plan for the Project reflects 134 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units (a reduction of 8 dwelling units). The higher dwelling unit count has been evaluated for the purposes of this traffic analysis in an effort to conduct a conservative analysis and provides flexibility in the event any minor changes occur as part of the final design. It is anticipated that the Project would be developed in a single phase with an anticipated Opening Year of 2024. For the purpose of this analysis, the following driveways will provide access to the Project site: • Driveway 1 via Rancho California Road – Full Access Regional access to the Project site is available from the I-15 Freeway and Rancho California Road interchange. 4.1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION Trip generation represents the amount of traffic which is both attracted to and produced by a development. Determining traffic generation for a specific project is therefore based upon forecasting the amount of traffic that is expected to be both attracted to and produced by the specific land uses being proposed for a given development. 4.1.1 PROPOSED PROJECT Trip generation rates used to estimate Project traffic are shown in Table 4-1. A summary of the Project’s trip generation is also shown in Table 4-1. The trip generation rates used for this analysis are based upon information collected by the ITE as provided in their Trip Generation Manual (10th Edition, 2017) for Multifamily Housing (Low-Rise, 2 floors) (ITE Land Use Code 220) and Multifamily Housing (Mid-Rise, 3 floors) (ITE Land Use Code 221). (3) As shown in Table 4-1, the proposed Project is anticipated to generate a net total of 792 trip-ends per day with 52 AM peak hour trips and 64 PM peak hour trips. 4.1.2 CURRENTLY ADOPTED LAND USE The Project site is located on 7.61 acres within Sub Areas A and B in the Planned Development Overlay (PDO-5). The currently adopted land use within Sub Areas A and B of PDO-5 includes 17,100 square feet of shopping center use, 6,000 square feet of high turnover (sit-down) restaurant use, 36,000 square feet of general office use, 9,800 square foot day care center, and a 12-vehicle fueling position gas station. The trip generation for the currently adopted uses is shown in Table 4-2, based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, trip generation rates. The currently adopted land uses would generate 2,266 trips per day, with 219 trips generated during the AM peak hour and 282 trips generated during the PM peak hour. 27 Table 4‐1 ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Units2 Code In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Low‐Rise) (1‐2 Floors) DU 220 0.11 0.35 0.46 0.35 0.21 0.56 7.32 Multifamily Housing (Mid‐Rise) (3‐10 Floors) DU 221 0.09 0.27 0.36 0.27 0.17 0.44 5.44 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Temecula Village Apartments Quantity Units 2 In Out Total In Out Total Multifamily Housing (Mid‐Rise) DU 132 12 35 47 35 23 58 718 Multifamily Housing (Low‐Rise) DU 10 14542674 TOTAL DU 142 13 39 52 39 25 64 792 1 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition (2017). 2 DU = Dwelling Units Trip Generation Summary: Proposed Project Daily Trip Generation Rates1 Daily Project Trip Generation Summary 28 Table 4‐2 ITE LU AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Units1 Code In Out Total In Out Total Day Care Center TSF 565 5.83 5.17 11.00 5.23 5.89 11.12 47.62 General Office TSF 710 1.00 0.16 1.16 0.18 0.97 1.15 9.74 Shopping Center TSF 820 0.58 0.36 0.94 1.83 1.98 3.81 37.75 High Turnover (Sit‐Down) Restaurant TSF 932 5.47 4.47 9.94 6.06 3.71 9.77 112.18 Gas Station with Convenience Market VFP 945 6.36 6.11 12.47 7.13 6.86 13.99 205.36 Land Use Quantity Units 1 In Out Total In Out Total Daily Shopping Center 17.100 TSF 10 6 16 31 34 65 646 0000‐1‐1‐10 ‐2 ‐7 ‐9 ‐1 ‐3 ‐4 ‐40 8 ‐1 7 30 30 60 596 0 0 0 ‐10 ‐10 ‐20 ‐204 8‐17 20 20 40 392 Gasoline/Service Station w/Convenience Mkt.12 VFP 76 73 149 86 82 168 2,464 0 0 0 ‐1 ‐1 ‐2 ‐30 ‐17 ‐19 ‐36 ‐10 ‐7 ‐17 ‐250 59 54 113 75 74 149 2,184 ‐33 ‐33 ‐66 ‐41 ‐41 ‐82 ‐1,224 26 21 47 34 33 67 960 High Turnover (Sit‐Down) Restaurant 6.000TSF332760362258674 0000‐1‐1‐12 ‐26 ‐19 ‐45 ‐10 ‐11 ‐21 ‐246 7 8 15 26 10 36 416 0 0 0 ‐4 ‐4 ‐8 ‐286 7 815226 28 130 General Office 36.000 TSF 36 6 42 7 35 42 352 0 0 0 ‐2 ‐1 ‐3 ‐26 000‐10‐1‐10 36 6 42 4 34 38 316 Day Care Center 9.800 TSF 57 51 108 51 58 109 468 134 85 219 131 151 282 2,266 1 TSF = thousand square feet; VFP = Vehicle Fueling Position 2 Trip Generation Source: Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE), Trip Generation Manual, Tenth Edition (2017). 3 Internal capture calculated from NCHRP 684 Internal Trip Capture Estimation Tool. 4 Source: ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition, 2017. Internal Capture (Restaurant to Retail)3: Internal Capture (Office to Retail)3: Total Net Trips Internal Capture (Office to Restaurant)3: General Office Total: Net External Trips: Pass‐by Reduction (PM: 43%, Daily: 43%)4: Restaurant Total: Shopping Center Total: Internal Capture (Retail to Office)3: Net External Trips: Pass‐by Reduction (AM: 62%; PM/Daily: 56%)4: Gasoline/Service Station w/Conven. Mkt. Total: Internal Capture (Restaurant to Office)3: Internal Capture (Retail to Restaurant)3: Trip Generation Summary: Currently Adopted Land Use AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Internal Capture (Retail to Office)3: Net External Trips: Pass‐by Reduction (PM/Daily: 34%)4: Daily Trip Generation Rates2 Trip Generation Summary Internal Capture (Retail to Restaurant)3: 29 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 30 4.1.3 TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON As shown in Table 4-3, the development of the proposed Project is anticipated to generate 1,474 fewer trip-ends per day with 167 fewer AM and 217 fewer PM peak hour trips as compared to the currently approved Project. As the proposed Project is anticipated to result in a net reduction to the AM, PM, and daily trips in comparison to that evaluated for the currently approved Project, the deficiencies are anticipated to be the same or less than those previously identified. Therefore, no additional traffic-related deficiencies are anticipated as a result of the development of the proposed Project. 4.2 PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION The Project trip distribution and assignment process represents the directional orientation of traffic to and from the Project site. The trip distribution pattern is heavily influenced by the geographical location of the site, the location of surrounding uses, and the proximity to the regional freeway system. The Project trip distribution pattern is graphically depicted on Exhibit 4- 1. The Project trip distribution pattern was reviewed by the City of Temecula as part of the traffic study scoping process (see Appendix 1.1). 4.3 MODAL SPLIT The potential for Project trips to be reduced by the use of public transit, walking or bicycling have not been included as part of the Project’s estimated trip generation. Essentially, the Project’s traffic projections are "conservative" in that these alternative travel modes would reduce the forecasted traffic volumes. 4.4 PROJECT TRIP ASSIGNMENT The assignment of traffic from the Project area to the adjoining roadway system is based upon the Project trip generation, trip distribution, and the arterial highway and local street system improvements that would be in place by the time of initial occupancy of the Project. Based on the identified Project traffic generation and trip distribution patterns, Project only ADT and peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4-2. 4.5 BACKGROUND TRAFFIC Future year traffic forecasts have been based upon background (ambient) growth of 10.41% for 2024 traffic conditions (2% per year, compounded annually over 5 years). This ambient growth rate is added to existing traffic volumes to account for area-wide growth not reflected by cumulative development projects. Ambient growth has been added to daily and peak hour traffic volumes on surrounding roadways, in addition to traffic generated by the development of future projects that have been approved but not yet built and/or for which development applications have been filed and are under consideration by governing agencies. EA (2024), EAP (2024), and EAPC (2024) traffic volumes are provided in Section 6 and Section 7 of this report, respectively. 30 Table 4‐3 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Project InOutTotalInOutTotal Currently Adopted Land Use 134 85 219 131 151 282 2,266 Proposed Project 13 39 52 39 25 64 792 Variance ‐121 ‐46 ‐167 ‐92 ‐126 ‐218 ‐1,474 Trip Generation Comparison Daily 31 DWY. 1 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - trip.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisEXHIBIT 4-1: PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTIONLEGEND:10= PERCENT TO/FROM PROJECT 5515 10015 8515510 32 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 0.70.1 0.70.60.60.40.1NOM1 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.320.10(0)0(0)0(0)1(4)0(0)0(0)0(0)10(29)0(0)0(0)29(19)4(3)0(0)0(0)1(2)2(6)0(0)0(0)0(0)7(21)0(0)2(1)21(14)6(4)= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:= NOMINAL, LESS THAN 5010.0NOM VEHICLES PER DAY= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 4-2: PROJECT ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES33(21)0(0)6(4)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)11(33)2(6)0(0)0(0)0.8 33 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 34 4.6 CUMULATIVE DEVELOPMENT TRAFFIC Other reasonably foreseeable development projects which are either approved or being processed concurrently in the study area also be included as part of a cumulative analysis scenario. A cumulative project list was developed for the purposes of this analysis through consultation with planning and engineering staff from the City of Temecula. Exhibit 4-3 illustrates the cumulative development location map. A summary of cumulative development projects and their proposed land uses are shown in Table 4-4. If applicable, the traffic generated by individual cumulative projects was manually added to the EAP (2024) forecasts to ensure that traffic generated by the listed cumulative development projects in Table 4-4 are reflected as part of the background traffic to estimate EAPC (2024) traffic forecasts. Cumulative ADT and peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are shown on Exhibit 4- 4. 34 35 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 2.00.1 1.0 2.12.92.1 2.83.10.41.71 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.321.30(0)0(0)0(0)2(6)0(0)33(10)50(5)55(51)0(0)0(0)103(38)6(3)47(28)13(8)22(15)3(8)4(13)0(0)0(0)79(32)14(47)9(23)112(19)9(5)= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 4-4: CUMULATIVE ONLY TRAFFIC VOLUMES48(28)0(0)6(3)0(0)0(0)0(0)0(0)45(10)9(31)3(8)60(13)0(0)36 Table 4‐4 1 Temecula Village Apartments (Phase 1)Multifamily Housing 160 DU 2 Rancho Highlands Multifamily Housing 240 DU Commercial Retail 237.000 TSF Restaurant 237.000 TSF Office 1,210.000 TSF Hotel 315 RM Multifamily Housing 3,726 DU 1 SFDR = Single Family Detached Residential 2 TSF = Thousand Square Feet; DU = Dwelling Unit; RM = Rooms Cumulative Development Land Use Summary # Project/Location Land Use1 Quantity Units 2 3 Uptown Temecula Specific Plan City of Temecula 37 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 38 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 38 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 39 5 E+P TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section discusses the traffic forecasts for Existing plus Project (E+P) conditions and the resulting intersection operations and traffic signal warrant analyses. 5.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for E+P conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following: • Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for E+P conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements at the Project’s frontage and driveways). 5.2 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing traffic volumes plus Project traffic. The ADT volumes and weekday AM and PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes which can be expected for E+P traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 5-1. 5.3 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS E+P peak hour traffic operations have been evaluated for the study area intersections based on the analysis methodologies presented in Section 2 Methodologies of this TA. The intersection analysis results are summarized in Table 5-1, which indicates that there are no additional study area intersections anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS with the addition of Project traffic, in addition to the locations identified previously for Existing (2019) traffic conditions. The Project is proposed to install the traffic signal at the intersection of Driveway 1 on Rancho California Road. As such, the traffic signal is assumed to be in place for E+P traffic conditions, which resolves the Existing (2019) deficiency at this location. Consistent with Table 5-1, a summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for E+P conditions is shown on Exhibit 5-2. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for E+P traffic conditions are included in Appendix 5.1 of this TA. 5.4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS With the addition of Project traffic, there are no unsignalized study area intersections that are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal for E+P traffic conditions. E+P conditions traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 5.2. 39 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 34.41.8 12.1 33.735.82.1 36.357.635.032.61 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.3231.726(20)24(27)27(45)153(198)28(22)357(258)146(309)585(1331)14(16)39(39)1226(941)135(156)652(489)422(626)82(136)65(179)253(585)398(559)434(733)713(1323)395(624)109(157)1285(894)154(223)= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 5-1: E+P TRAFFIC VOLUMES33(21)0(0)6(4)17(5)0(0)37(33)46(86)699(1479)11(33)10(17)1313(1018)14(23)0.9 40 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - los.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 LEGEND:= LOS E= AM PEAK HOUR = PM PEAK HOUR= LOS A-D= LOS FEXHIBIT 5-2: E+P SUMMARY OF LOS41 Table 5‐1HCM Delay1HCM Delay1Traffic (secs.)(secs.)# IntersectionControl2AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM1 Ynez Rd. & Rancho California Rd. TS55.7 71.1 E E 55.8 71.6 E E0.1 0.5 No2 Moraga Rd. & Rancho California Rd. TS 33.1 34.6 C C 33.9 34.7 C C ‐‐ ‐‐ No3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd. CSS/TS546.8 39.7 E E9.7 10.4 A B ‐‐ ‐‐ No*BOLD = LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements (i.e., unacceptable LOS).1Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections witha traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worstindividual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown.2CSS = Cross‐Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Improvement3The change in delay is calculated between pre‐project and With Project scenarios already operating at an unacceptable LOS in the pre‐project condition.45The Project will construct a traffic signal as part of the site access improvements.Intersection Analysis for E+P ConditionsLevel ofServiceChange in Delay (sec.)3Significant Impact?4Impact is significant if the pre‐project condition is at or better than LOS D and the project‐generated traffic causes deterioration below acceptable levels, a deficiency is deemed to occur. However, if the pre‐project condition is already below LOS D, and the Project either contributes 50 or more peak hour trips and increases the delay by 2.0 seconds or more from the pre‐project condition (City of Temecula threshold), then the Project will be responsible for mitigating its impact to a LOS equal to or better than preproject conditions.Existing (2019)E+PLevel ofService 42 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 43 5.5 DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As shown in Table 5-1, the intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours with the addition of Project traffic. However, the Project will increase the delay by less than 2.0 seconds in comparison to Existing traffic conditions and will contribute less than 50 peak hour trips. Consistent with the City of Temecula TA Guidelines, the deficiency is considered less than significant. As such, no improvements have been recommended. 43 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 44 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 44 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 45 6 EA AND EAP (2024) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section discusses the methods used to develop EA and EAP (2024) traffic forecasts, and the resulting intersection operations and traffic signal warrant analyses. 6.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for EA and EAP (2024) conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following: • Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAP (2024) conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements along the Project’s frontage and driveways). 6.2 EA (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing traffic volumes plus an ambient growth factor of 10.41%. The weekday ADT and weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes which can be expected for EA (2024) traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 6-1. 6.3 EAP (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing traffic volumes plus an ambient growth factor of 10.41% plus Project traffic. The weekday ADT and weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes which can be expected for EAP (2024) traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 6-2. 6.4 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS LOS calculations were conducted for the study intersections to evaluate their operations under EA (2024) traffic conditions with the roadway and intersection geometrics consistent with Section 6.1 Roadway Improvements. As shown in Table 6-1, the following intersections are anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours under EA (2024) traffic conditions: • Ynez Road & Rancho California Road (#1) – LOS E AM peak hour; LOS F PM peak hour • Driveway 1 & Rancho California Road (#3) – LOS F AM peak hour; LOS E PM peak hour With the addition of Project traffic, there are no additional study area intersections anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS under EAP (2024) traffic conditions, in addition to the locations identified previously for EA (2024) traffic conditions. The Project is proposed to install the traffic signal at the intersection of Driveway 1 on Rancho California Road. As such, the traffic signal is assumed to be in place for EAP (2024) traffic conditions, which resolves the EA (2024) deficiency at this location. A summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for EA (2024) and EAP (2024) traffic conditions is shown on Exhibits 6-3 and 6-4, respectively. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for EA (2024) and EAP (2024) traffic conditions are included in Appendices 6.1 and 6.2, respectively. 45 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 37.22.0 13.2 36.538.92.3 39.463.138.535.91 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 6-1: EA (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES3234.929(22)26(30)30(50)168(214)31(24)394(285)161(341)635(1438)15(18)43(43)1322(1018)145(169)720(540)466(691)89(148)70(191)279(646)439(617)479(809)779(1438)436(689)118(172)1396(972)163(242)19(6)41(36)51(95)772(1633)1450(1124)15(25)46 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 37.92.0 13.3 37.239.52.3 40.063.538.636.01 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 6-2: EAP (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES33(21)0(0)6(4)19(6)0(0)41(36)51(95)772(1633)11(33)11(18)1450(1124)15(25)0.9 3235.029(22)26(30)30(50)169(218)31(24)394(285)161(341)645(1467)15(18)43(43)1351(1037)149(172)720(540)466(691)90(150)72(197)279(646)439(617)479(809)786(1459)436(689)120(173)1417(986)169(246)47 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.SITEN12799 - los.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 LEGEND:= LOS E= AM PEAK HOUR = PM PEAK HOUR= LOS A-D= LOS FEXHIBIT 6-3: EA (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS48 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - los.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 LEGEND:= LOS E= AM PEAK HOUR = PM PEAK HOUR= LOS A-D= LOS FEXHIBIT 6-4: EAP (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS49 Table 6‐1HCM Delay1HCM Delay1Traffic (secs.)(secs.)# IntersectionControl2AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM AM PM1 Ynez Rd. & Rancho California Rd.TS70.7 87.1 E F 71.0 87.7 E F0.3 0.6 No2 Moraga Rd. & Rancho California Rd.TS 45.1 42.3 D D 47.9 42.4 D D‐‐ ‐‐No3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd. CSS/TS561.8 49.0 F E10.4 11.5 B B‐‐ ‐‐No*BOLD = LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements (i.e., unacceptable LOS).1Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are shown for intersections witha traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and level of service for the worstindividual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown.2CSS = Cross‐Street Stop; TS = Traffic Signal; CSS = Improvement3The change in delay is calculated between pre‐project and With Project scenarios already operating at an unacceptable LOS in the pre‐project condition.45The Project will construct a traffic signal as part of the site access improvements.Intersection Analysis for EA and EAP (2024) ConditionsImpact is significant if the pre‐project condition is at or better than LOS D and the project‐generated traffic causes deterioration below acceptable levels, a deficiency is deemed to occur. However, if the pre‐project condition is already below LOS D, and the Project either contributes 50 or more peak hour trips and increases the delay by 2.0 seconds or more from the pre‐project condition (City of Temecula threshold), then the Project will be responsible for mitigating its impact to a LOS equal to or better than pre‐project conditions.EA (2024)EAP (2024)Level ofLevel ofServiceServiceChange in Delay (sec.)3Significant Impact?4 50 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 51 6.5 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS There are no unsignalized study area intersections that are anticipated to warrant a traffic signal for EA and EAP (2024) traffic conditions. EAP (2024) conditions traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets are provided in Appendices 6.3 and 6.4, respectively. 6.6 DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As shown in Table 6-1, the intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours with the addition of Project traffic. However, the Project will increase the delay by less than 2.0 seconds in comparison to EA (2024) traffic conditions and will contribute less than 50 peak hour trips. Consistent with the City of Temecula TA Guidelines, the deficiency is considered less than significant. As such, no improvements have been recommended. 51 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 52 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 52 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 53 7 EAPC (2024) TRAFFIC CONDITIONS This section discusses the methods used to develop EAPC (2024) traffic forecasts, and the resulting intersection operations and traffic signal warrant analyses. 7.1 ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS The lane configurations and traffic controls assumed to be in place for EAPC (2024) conditions are consistent with those shown previously on Exhibit 3-1, with the exception of the following: • Project driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by the Project to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAPC (2024) conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements along the Project’s frontage and driveways). • Driveways and those facilities assumed to be constructed by cumulative developments to provide site access are also assumed to be in place for EAPC (2024) conditions only (e.g., intersection and roadway improvements along the cumulative development’s frontages and driveways). 7.2 EAPC (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUME FORECASTS This scenario includes Existing traffic volumes plus an ambient growth factor of 10.41% plus traffic from pending and approved but not yet constructed known development projects in the area, plus Project traffic. The weekday ADT and weekday AM and PM peak hour volumes which can be expected for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions are shown on Exhibit 7-1. 7.3 INTERSECTION OPERATIONS ANALYSIS LOS calculations were conducted for the study intersections to evaluate their operations under EAPC (2024) traffic conditions with the roadway and intersection geometrics consistent with Section 7.1 Roadway Improvements. As shown in Table 7-1, the following intersection is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours under EAPC (2024) traffic conditions: • Ynez Road & Rancho California Road (#1) – LOS F AM and PM peak hours The Project is proposed to install the traffic signal at the intersection of Driveway 1 on Rancho California Road. As such, the traffic signal is assumed to be in place for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions. A summary of the peak hour intersection LOS for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions is shown on Exhibit 7-2. The intersection operations analysis worksheets for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions is included in Appendix 7.1. 53 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - vols.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis1DWY. 1 39.92.0 14.3 39.342.32.3 42.866.639.137.71 Ynez Rd. &Rancho California Rd.23 Moraga Rd. &Rancho California Rd. Dwy. 1 &Rancho California Rd.= VEHICLES PER DAY (1000'S)LEGEND:10.0= AM(PM) PEAK HOUR INTERSECTION VOLUMES10(10)EXHIBIT 7-1: EAPC (2024) TRAFFIC VOLUMES81(49)0(0)12(7)19(6)0(0)41(36)51(95)817(1643)20(64)14(26)1510(1137)15(25)1.9 3236.329(22)26(30)30(50)171(224)31(24)427(295)211(346)700(1518)15(18)43(43)1454(1075)155(175)767(568)479(699)112(165)75(205)283(659)439(617)479(809)865(1491)450(736)129(196)1529(1005)178(251)54 RANCHO CALIFORNIA RD.MORAGA R D . YNEZ R D.N12799 - los.dwgURBANRendezvous - Phase II Focused Traffic AnalysisDWY. 1 LEGEND:= LOS E= AM PEAK HOUR = PM PEAK HOUR= LOS A-D= LOS FEXHIBIT 7-2: EAPC (2024) SUMMARY OF LOS55 Table 7‐1 HCM Delay1 Traffic (secs.) # Intersection Control 2 AM PM AM PM 1 Ynez Rd. & Rancho California Rd.TS 81.5 92.4 F F 2 Moraga Rd. & Rancho California Rd.TS 54.6 52.3 D D 3 Driveway 1 & Rancho California Rd.TS3 12.2 12.9 B B *BOLD = LOS does not meet the applicable jurisdictional requirements (i.e., unacceptable LOS). 1 Per the Highway Capacity Manual (6th Edition), overall average intersection delay and level of service are a traffic signal or all way stop control. For intersections with cross street stop control, the delay and leve individual movement (or movements sharing a single lane) are shown. 2 TS = Traffic Signal; TS = Improvement 3 The Project will construct a traffic signal as part of the site access improvements. Intersection Analysis for EAPC (2024) Conditions EAPC (2024) Level of Service 56 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 57 7.4 TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANTS ANALYSIS The following unsignalized study area intersection is anticipated to warrant a traffic signal for EAPC (2024) traffic conditions: • Driveway 1 & Rancho California Road (#3) EAPC (2024) conditions traffic signal warrant analysis worksheets are provided in Appendix 7.2. 7.5 DEFICIENCIES AND RECOMMENDED IMPROVEMENTS As shown in Table 7-1, the intersection of Ynez Road and Rancho California Road is anticipated to operate at an unacceptable LOS during the peak hours. However, the Project will contribute less than 50 peak hour trips. As such, the deficiency is considered less than significant, and no improvements have been recommended. 57 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 58 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 58 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 59 8 LOCAL AND REGIONAL FUNDING MECHANISMS Transportation improvements within the City of Temecula are funded through a combination of improvements constructed by the Project, development impact fee programs or fair share contributions. Identification and timing of needed improvements is generally determined through local jurisdictions based upon a variety of factors. 8.1 CITY OF TEMECULA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE PROGRAM The City’s current Development Impact Fee (DIF) program is based on the Development Impact Fees report prepared in 2019. The most current fee schedule is available for the 2019-2024 fiscal year. Fees from new residential, commercial and industrial development are collected to fund local facilities. Under the City’s DIF program, the City may grant to developers a credit against specific components of fees when those developers construct certain facilities and landscaped medians identified in the list of improvements funded by the DIF program. After the City’s DIF fees are collected, they are placed in a separate restricted use account pursuant to the requirements of Government Code sections 66000 et seq. The timing to use the DIF fees is established through periodic capital improvement programs which are overseen by the City’s Engineering Department. Periodic traffic counts, review of traffic accidents, and a review of traffic trends throughout the City are also periodically performed by City staff and consultants. The City uses this data to determine the timing of the improvements listed in its facilities list. The City also uses this data to ensure that the improvements listed on the facilities list are constructed before the LOS falls below the LOS performance standards adopted by the City. In this way, the improvements are constructed before the LOS falls below the City’s LOS performance thresholds. The City’s DIF program establishes a timeline to fund, design, and build the improvements. 8.2 TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE (TUMF) PROGRAM The TUMF program is administered by the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) based upon a regional Nexus Study most recently updated in 2016 to address major changes in right of way acquisition and improvement cost factors. (7) This regional program was put into place to ensure that development pays its fair share and that funding is in place for construction of facilities needed to maintain the requisite level of service and critical to mobility in the region. TUMF is a truly regional mitigation fee program and is imposed and implemented in every jurisdiction in Western Riverside County. TUMF guidelines empower a local zone committee to prioritize and arbitrate certain projects. The Project is located in the Southwest Zone. The zone has developed a 5-year capital improvement program to prioritize public construction of certain roads. TUMF is focused on improvements necessitated by regional growth. 59 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 60 8.3 FAIR SHARE CONTRIBUTION Project improvement may include a combination of fee payments to established programs, construction of specific improvements, payment of a fair share contribution toward future improvements or a combination of these approaches. Improvements constructed by development may be eligible for a fee credit or reimbursement through the program where appropriate (to be determined at the City’s discretion). When off-site improvements are identified with a minor share of responsibility assigned to proposed development, the approving jurisdiction may elect to collect a fair share contribution or require the development to construct improvements. These fees are collected with the proceeds solely used as part of a funding mechanism aimed at ensuring that regional highways and arterial expansions keep pace with the projected population increases. 60 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 61 9 REFERENCES 1. City of Temecula Public Works. Traffic Impact Analysis Guidelines. Temecula : s.n., May 2011. 2. California Department of Transportation. Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. December 2002. 3. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. 10th Edition. 2017. 4. Riverside County Transportation Commission. 2011 Riverside County Congestion Management Program. County of Riverside : RCTC, December 14, 2011. 5. Transportation Research Board. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). 6th Edition. s.l. : National Academy of Sciences, 2016. 6. Caltrans. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). [book auth.] California Department of Transportation. California Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (CAMUTCD). 2014. 7. Western Riverside Council of Governments. TUMF Nexus Study, 2016 Program Update. July 2017. 61 Rendezvous – Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis 12799-03 TA Report REV 62 This Page Intentionally Left Blank 62 12799-10 VMT Screening November 6, 2020 Mr. Tom Dodson Tom Dodson & Associates P.O. Box 2307 San Bernardino, CA 92406 SUBJECT: RENDEZVOUS – PHASE II VEHICLE MILES TRAVELLED (VMT) SCREENING ANALYSIS Dear Mr. Tom Dodson: The following Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Screening Analysis has been prepared for the proposed Rendezvous – Phase II development (Project), which is located south of Rancho California Road and west of Cosmic Drive in City of Temecula. PROJECT OVERVIEW At the time the Rendezvous-Phase II Focused Traffic Analysis (Urban Crossroads, November 2020) (formerly known as Temecula Village Apartments – Phase II) was prepared, the Project included the development of 142 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units. However, the current site plan for the Project reflects 134 multifamily (mid-rise) residential dwelling units (a reduction of 8 dwelling units). The higher dwelling unit count was evaluated for the purposes of the traffic analysis in an effort to conduct a conservative analysis and provides flexibility in the event any minor changes occur as part of the final design. Trips generated by the Project’s proposed land uses have been estimated based on trip generation rates collected by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, 2017. (1) The proposed Project is anticipated to generate a total of 792 vehicle trip-ends per day (in actual vehicles). (See Attachment A) BACKGROUND Changes to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines were adopted in December 2018, which requires all lead agencies to adopt VMT as a replacement for automobile delay-based level of service (LOS) as the new measure for identifying transportation impacts for land use projects. This statewide mandate went into effect July 1, 2020. To aid in this transition, the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) released a Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA (December of 2018) (Technical Advisory). (2) The City of Temecula has adopted project level screening thresholds consistent with those recommended in the Technical Advisory (City Guidelines). (3) Mr. Tom Dodson Tom Dodson & Associates November 6, 2020 Page 2 of 4 12799-10 VMT Screening PROJECT SCREENING Consistent with City Guidelines, projects should evaluate available screening criteria based on their location and project type to determine if a presumption of a less than significant transportation impact can be made. The following project screening thresholds were selected for review base on their applicability to the proposed Project: • Small Residential and Employment Projects Screening • Projects Located Near a Major Transit Stop/ High Quality Transit Corridor Screening • Projects Located in a VMT Efficient Area Screening A land use project need only meet one of the above screening criteria to result in a less than significant impact. SMALL RESIDENTIAL AND EMPLOYMENT PROJECTS SCREENING The City Guidelines identify that projects that generate fewer than 110 daily vehicle trips are presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. The Project is estimated to generate vehicle trips in excess of the 110 daily trip threshold. The Small Residential and Employment Projects screening threshold is not met. MAJOR TRANSIT STOP/ HIGH QUALITY TRANSIT CORRIDOR SCREENING Consistent with guidance identified in the Technical Advisory, projects located within a Transit Priority Area (TPA) (i.e., within ½ mile of an existing “major transit stop”1 or an existing stop along a “high-quality transit corridor”2) may be presumed to have a less than significant impact absent substantial evidence to the contrary. However, the presumption may not be appropriate if a project: • Has a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of less than 0.75; • Includes more parking for use by residents, customers, or employees of the project than required by the jurisdiction (if the jurisdiction requires the project to supply parking); • Replaces affordable residential units with a smaller number of moderate- or high-income residential units. The Project is not located within ½ mile of an existing major transit stop, or along a high-quality transit corridor. The Major Transit Stop High Quality Transit Corridor screening threshold is not met. 1 Pub. Resources Code, § 21064.3 (“‘Major transit stop’ means a site containing an existing rail transit station, a ferry terminal served by either a bus or rail transit service, or the intersection of two or more major bus routes with a frequency of service interval of 15 minutes or less during the morning and afternoon peak commute periods.”). 2 Pub. Resources Code, § 21155 (“For purposes of this section, a high-quality transit corridor means a corridor with fixed route bus service with service intervals no longer than 15 minutes during peak commute hours.”). Mr. Tom Dodson Tom Dodson & Associates November 6, 2020 Page 3 of 4 12799-10 VMT Screening VMT EFFICIENT AREA SCREENING The Technical Advisory notes that “residential and office projects that locate in areas with low VMT, and that incorporate similar features (i.e., density, mix of uses, transit accessibility), will tend to exhibit similarly low VMT.”3 City Guidelines also note that the use of map-based screening for VMT efficient areas is applicable for uses such as the Project’s residential development. Urban Crossroads has obtained a map from the City Guidelines that identifies VMT efficient areas. The map utilizes the sub-regional Riverside Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM) to measure current VMT performance and compares them to the applicable impact threshold. As shown in Attachment B, the Project is located within an area that is 15% below the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG) Regional Average. The VMT Efficient Area screening threshold is met. CONCLUSION Based on our review of applicable VMT screening thresholds, the Project is meets the VMT Efficient Area screening. Therefore, the Project would be presumed to result in a less than significant VMT impact. The Project was not found to meet the Small Residential and Employment Projects or Major Transit Stop High Quality Transit Corridor screening, however meeting the VMT Efficient Area screening is sufficient to determine a less than significant impact; no additional VMT analysis is required. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at aevatt@urbanxroads.com. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Aric Evatt, PTP Robert Vu, PE President Transportation Engineer 3 Technical Advisory; Page 12 Mr. Tom Dodson Tom Dodson & Associates November 6, 2020 Page 4 of 4 12799-10 VMT Screening REFERENCES 1. Institute of Transportation Engineers. Trip Generation Manual. 10th Edition. 2017. 2. Office of Planning and Research. Technical Advisory on Evaluating Transportation Impacts in CEQA. State of California : s.n., December 2018. 12799-10 VMT Screening ATTACHMENT A: PROJECT TRIP GENERATION 12799-10 VMT Screening 12799-10 VMT Screening ATTACHMENT B: VMT SCREENING MAP 12799-10 VMT Screening Appendix F – Response to Comments on the Draft Initial Study/Negative Declaration This Final Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for the Rendezvous Phase II Apartments project. A total of two (2) comment letters were received during the public review period from May 27, 2021 to June 27, 2021. The comment letters and responses are included in Appendix F. Comments were received from the following agencies:  Letter 1 - Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, June 23, 2021  Letter 2 - Temecula Valley Unified School District, June 25, 2021 Letter 1 - Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District, June 23, 2021 Response to Letter 1 The letter describes the roles and responsibilities of the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) and outlines standard requirements related to flood control. The letter indicates that the project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities and does not propose facilities of regional interest. In addition, the letter states that the project site is within the Temecula Valley Area Drainage Plan, for which drainage fees have been adopted. The applicant would be required to pay any applicable District fees as a standard condition of approval prior to the issuance of grading and building permits. The letter states that the project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. As discussed under Response 7.b, the Project would result in a disturbance area of greater than one acre. The applicant would be required to obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009- DWQ) from the San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) prior to ground disturbing activities. The letter describes the requirements for projects within a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, which include providing floodplain studies; obtaining a Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to grading, recordation, or final approval of the project; and obtaining a Letter of Map Revision prior to occupancy. As discussed under Response 10.c.iv, the Project Site is not located within a 100-Year Flood Zone, as shown in Figure PS- 2 of the City’s General Plan Public Safety Element (City of Temecula, 2005d). Response 10.c.iv was updated to state that the 100-Year Flood Zones mapped in Figure PS-2 correspond with FEMA’s Special Flood Hazard Areas. Therefore, no further studies or approvals would be required to meet FEMA requirements. The letter states that the applicant would be required to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act (CWA) Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local RWQCB prior to issuance of the USACE 404 permit. As discussed under Response 4.b and 4.c, the Project Site has been previously rough graded and there are no natural watercourses within the project site. Response 4.b and 4.c was updated to state that no surface waters or state or federally protected wetlands, as shown on the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Wetlands Mapper (2021), were identified within the project site. In addition, as described above, the project site is not within a mapped floodplain. Therefore, the applicant would not be required to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement, a Section 404 Permit, or a Section 401 Water Quality Certification. No further revisions have been made to the Initial Study/Negative Declaration in response to this letter. Impacts related to floodplains would remain less than significant. Letter 2 - Temecula Valley Unified School District, June 25, 2021 Response to Letter 2 The letter states that the proposed apartment units are expected to generate approximately 75 K-12 students for the Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD), not including any students in the transitional kindergarten year. As described under Response 15.c, the applicant would be required to pay developer fees as a condition of Project approval. For new single and multi-family residential units, the developer fee is $4.08 for each square foot of accessible space. Pursuant to Government Code section 65995, payment of fees would result in the avoidance of impacts to schools. Response 15.c was updated to include the number of students that would be generated by the Project and the specific developer fee required for new residential units. No further revisions have been made to the Initial Study/Negative Declaration in response to this letter. Impacts related to schools would remain less than significant.